6 

FORM Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

Note 1. General

Overview

On May 6, 2016, Vringo, Inc. changed its name to FORM Holdings Corp. (“FORM” or the “Company”) and concurrently announced its repositioning asis a holding company of small andto middle market growth companies. The Company’s focus is on acquiringCompany has three operating segments: wellness, technology and building companies that would benefit from:intellectual property.

The Company’s management team is committed to execute on its strategy. The Company is industry agnostic, but limits the scopewellness operating segment consists of its pipeline by looking only at companies with a clear path to grow in excess of $100,000 in revenue.

The Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share,XpresSpa, which was previously listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the trading symbol “VRNG,” has been listed under the trading symbol “FH” since May 9, 2016.

The Company currently has three operating segments:

Group Mobile is a growing premier supplierleading airport retailer of innovativespa services. XpresSpa is a well-recognized airport spa brand with 53 locations in 40 terminals and full-service mobile technology solutions,22 airports in the United States, Netherlands, and United Arab Emirates. XpresSpa offers travelers premium spa services, including rugged computers, tablets, mobile devices, accessories, a full suite of professional servicesmassage, nail and other related products geared toward emergency first responders, municipalities and corporations. In addition, Group Mobile specializes in high-quality customer service and support for those products.

FLI Charge owns a patented conductive wireless charging technology and focuses on the development and commercialization of its technology through the direct-to-consumer sale of enablements,hair as well as partnershipsspa and licensing agreements in various industries. FLI Charge is currently working with partners that are interested in implementing FLI Charge technology for smart furniture, Original Equipment Manufacturers, or “OEM,” and after-market automobiles and vaporizers. FLI Charge’s business model is based on licensing its technology in exchange for recurring licensing revenue as well as manufacturing and commercializing its own conductive charging pads and associated cases for phones, tablets and laptops.

The intellectual property operating segment is focused on the innovation, development and monetization of intellectual property. The Company’s portfolio consists of over 600 patents and patent applications covering telecom infrastructure, internet search, ad-insertion and mobile technologies.

Prior to December 31, 2013, the Company operated a global platform for the distribution of mobile social applications and services. On February 18, 2014, the Company sold its mobile social application business to InfoMedia Services Limited (“InfoMedia”), receiving an 8.25% ownership interest in InfoMedia as consideration and a seat on the board of directors of InfoMedia. As part of the transaction, the Company has the opportunity to license certain intellectual property assets and work with InfoMedia to identify and protect new intellectual property.

Each of the Company’s operating segments are described below.

Group Mobile

Group Mobile is a growing and innovative full, end-to-end solution provider for project lifecycle services including system integration, hardware service support, pre- and post-deployment and customer support helpdesk. Group Mobile provides total hardware solutions, including rugged laptops, tablets and handheld computers. Group Mobile also markets rugged mobile printers, vehicle computer docking and mounting gear, power accessories, wireless communication products, antennas, carrying cases, and other peripherals, accessories and add-ons needed to maximize productivity in a mobile- or field-computing environment.

Group Mobile operates a full-service e-commerce website with live chat, up-to-date product information and computer system configuration capabilities. Group Mobile’s goal is to ensure that its customers purchase the best products and services for their specific requirements.

Group Mobile purchases rugged mobile computing equipment and complementary products from its primary distribution and manufacturing partners and sells them to enterprises, resellers, and retail customers. Group Mobile’s primary customers range from corporations to local governments, emergency first responders and healthcare organizations. Group Mobile believes that its business is characterized by gross profits as a percentage of revenue slightly higher than is commonly found in resellers of computing devices. The market for rugged mobile computing products is trending towards an increase in the volume of unit sales combined with declining unit prices as the business transitions from primarily being comprised of laptops to one primarily comprised of rugged tablets. As this transition has occurred, Group Mobile is seeing shortened product life cycles and industry specific devices for segments such as healthcare. Group Mobile sets sale prices based on the market supply and demand characteristics for each particular product. Group Mobile is highly dependent on the end-market demand for rugged mobile computing products, which is influenced by many factors, including the introduction of new IT products by OEM, replacement cycles for existing rugged mobile computing products, overall economic growth, local and state budgets, and general business activity.

Product costs represent Group Mobile’s single largest expense and product inventory is one of the largest working capital investments for Group Mobile. Group Mobile’s primary suppliers include Synnex Corporation, Ingram Micro Inc., and Xplore Technologies Corporation, which, combined, represent approximately 80% of Group Mobile’s inventory purchases. Group Mobile has reseller agreements with most of its OEM and distribution partners. These agreements usually provide for nonexclusive resale and distribution rights. The agreements are generally short-term, subject to periodic renewal, and often contain provisions permitting termination by either Group Mobile or the supplier without cause upon relatively short notice. Furthermore, product procurement from the OEM suppliers is a highly complex process and, as such, efficient and effective purchasing operations are critical to Group Mobile’s success.

FLI Charge

FLI Charge is a wireless power company dedicated to simplifying the way people power and charge the multitude of mobile electronic devices they use on a daily basis. By eliminating the need to search and compete for outlets and charging cables, FLI Charge is improving the powering and charging experience for all currently existing battery and DC powered devices.

FLI Charge designs, develops, licenses, manufactures and markets wireless conductive power and charging solutions. FLI Charge is currently working with partners in several verticals to bring products to market. These verticals include education, office, hospitality, automotive and consumer electronics among others. To date, FLI Charge has not yet generated any substantial revenue from its product sales.travel products. The Company believes that FLI Charge’s patented technology is the only wireless power solution that is fully interoperable between different mobile devices ranging from smartphones to power tools, and many more. FLI Charge’s wireless power solution can simultaneously power multiple devices on the same pad no matter their power requirements or positions on the pad.

FLI Charge’s product line consists of power pads or surfaces as well as devices that are connected to or embedded with FLI Charge enabling technology. FLI Charge pads and surfaces are connected to a power source or battery. The surface of the pad has conductive contact strips that provide power and are constantly monitored by control circuitry that immediately halts power transfer if an unapproved load or short-circuit condition is detected. FLI Charge-enabled devices are embedded with the FLI Charge contact enablement that consists of four contact points, known as the “constellation.” The constellation is designed to make an immediate and continuous electrical connection with the contact strips regardless of the device’s orientation on the pad. The enablement monitors the power coming from the pad and ensures that the correct amount of power goes to the device. Once an approved FLI Charge device is placed on a pad, power is transferred immediately to charge or power the device.

FLI Charge launched its consumer product line on Indiegogo, a crowdfunding platform, on June 15, 2016; the campaign is ongoing as of June 30, 2016. The Company accounts for funds raised from crowdfunding campaigns and pre-sales, which was $177 as of June 30, 2016, as deferred revenue. FLI Charge expects to deliver products to the participantsacquired XpresSpa in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Intellectual PropertyThe Company’s technology operating segment consists of Group Mobile and FLI Charge as well as an 11% equity interest in InfoMedia Services Limited (“InfoMedia”). Group Mobile offers rugged hardware and software solutions, including laptops, tablets, and mobile printers, as well as installation and deployment services. FLI Charge offers wireless conductive charging and power solutions for electronic devices. The Company acquired Group Mobile and FLI Charge in the fourth quarter of 2015 and Excalibur Integrated Systems Inc. (“Excalibur”), which was merged with Group Mobile, in the first quarter of 2017. The Company’s equity interest in InfoMedia increased from 8.25% to 11% in the first quarter of 2017 due to a realignment of ownership interests.

The Company’s intellectual property operating segment is focused onengaged in the innovation, development and monetization of intellectual property. The Company’s portfolio consists of over 600 patents related to content and patent applications covering telecom infrastructure, internet search, ad-insertionad delivery, remote monitoring and mobile technologies.

The Company is currently focused on monetizing its technology portfolio through a variety of value enhancing initiatives including, but not limited to, licensing, litigation and strategic partnerships. 

Recent Developments

Name Change

On May 6, 2016, the Company changed its name from Vringo, Inc. to FORM Holdings Corp. (“FORM” or the “Company”) and concurrently announced its repositioning as a holding company of small and middle market growth companies. The Company’s focus is on acquiring and building companies that would benefit from:

The Company’s management team is committed to execute on its strategy. The Company is industry agnostic, but limits the scope of its pipeline by looking only at companies with a clear path to grow in excess of $100,000 in revenue.

The Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, which was previously listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the trading symbol “VRNG,” has been listed under the trading symbol “FH” since May 9, 2016.

Impairment of Patents

The Company’s name change and repositioning as a holding company was deemed a triggering event, which required the Company’s patent assets to be tested for impairment. In performing this impairment test, the Company determined that the patent portfolios, which together represent an asset group, were subject to impairment testing. In the first step of the impairment test, the Company utilized its projections of future undiscounted cash flows based on its existing plans for the patents. As a result, it was determined that the Company’s projections of future undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying value of the asset group. Accordingly, the Company performed the second step of the impairment test to measure the potential impairment by calculating the asset group’s fair value as of May 6, 2016. As a result, following amortization for the month of April, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $11,937, which resulted in a new carrying value of $1,526 on May 6, 2016. Following the impairment, the Company reevaluated the remaining useful life and concluded that there were no changes in the estimated useful life.

Shareholder Rights Plan

On March 18, 2016, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan in the form of a Section 382 Rights Agreement designed to preserve the Company’s tax assets. As a part of the plan, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred-share-purchase right for each share of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of March 29, 2016. Effective on March 18, 2016, if any group or person acquires 4.99% or more of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, or if a group or person that already owns 4.99% or more of the Company’s common stock acquires additional shares representing 0.5% or more of the Company’s common stock, then, subject to certain exceptions, there would be a triggering event under the plan. The rights would then separate from the Company’s common stock and would be adjusted to become exercisable to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock having a market value equal to twice the purchase price of $9.50, resulting in significant dilution in the ownership interest of the acquiring person or group. The Company’s Board of Directors has the discretion to exempt any acquisition of the Company’s common stock from the provisions of the plan and has the ability to terminate the plan prior to a triggering event. In connection with this plan, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of Series C Junior Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 18, 2016.

Senior Secured Notes

On March 9, 2016, the Company and the holders (the “Investors”) of the Company’s $12,500 Senior Secured Convertible Notes (the “Notes”), which were originally issued by the Company in a registered direct offering on May 4, 2015, entered into an exchange note agreement (the “Exchange Note Agreement”). Pursuant to the Exchange Note Agreement, the Company issued to the Investors an aggregate of 703,644 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, in exchange for the reduction of $1,267 of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Notes and $49 of accrued interest. As a result, the outstanding aggregate principal amount under the Notes was reduced from $3,016 to $1,749 as of March 9, 2016.

In addition, on March 9, 2016, the Company, with the consent of each of the Investors, agreed to amend the Notes. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Notes (the “Amended Notes”) and the Indenture dated May 4, 2015, as supplemented by a First Supplemental Indenture dated May 4, 2015 and further supplemented by a Second Supplemental Indenture (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”) dated March 9, 2016: (i) the Amended Notes are no longer convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock and will be payable by the Company on the Maturity Date (as defined below) in cash only, (ii) the Maturity Date of the Amended Notes will extend to June 30, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”), (iii) the Company will discontinue the payment of principal prior to the Maturity Date (subject to certain exceptions), (iv) the interest rate increased from 8% to 10% per annum and will accrue on the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Amended Notes, payable monthly, and (v) the Company will pay to the Investors on the Maturity Date 102% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Amended Notes. The Company also agreed to maintain a cash balance (including cash equivalents) of not less than $2,900.

In addition, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of the warrants to purchase an aggregate of 537,500 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the initial agreement (the “May 2015 Warrants”) from $10.00 to $3.00 per share and the parties also agreed to remove from the May 2015 Warrants certain anti-dilution features. Other terms of the May 2015 Warrants remained the same. Furthermore, in connection with the Amended Notes, the Company paid a restructuring fee of $50 to the Investors.

On July 1, 2016, the Company prepaid in full its Amended Notes that were due on June 30, 2017. As required by the terms of the Amended Notes, notice of prepayment was delivered to the Investors on June 30, 2016. The Company repaid the Amended Notes in full, including repayment of the principal and accrued interest as well as an additional 15% for early repayment. The Company used an aggregate of $2,011 of cash on hand for repayment of the Amended Notes. As a result of the repayment in full of the Amended Notes, all liens on the Company’s assets, including intellectual property, were released by the Investors.

Reverse Stock Split

Unless otherwise noted, the information contained in these condensed consolidated financial statements gives effect to a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our common stock effected on November 27, 2015 on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

Note 2. Accounting and Reporting Policies

(a) Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected by the Company as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01.Company. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for the six-monththree-month period ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or for any other interim period. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

(b) Use of estimates

The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results may differ from such estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the Company’s valuation of intangible assets, the useful lives of the Company’s intangible assets, the valuation of the Company’s derivative warrants, the valuation of stock-based compensation, deferred tax assets and liabilities, income tax uncertainties, and other contingencies.

(c) Accounting guidanceRevenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue for the wellness operating segment from the sale of XpresSpa products and services at the point of sale, net of discounts and applicable sales taxes. Revenues from the XpresSpa wholesale and e-commerce businesses are recorded at the time goods are shipped. The Company excludes all sales taxes assessed to its customers. Sales taxes assessed on revenues are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets until remitted to the state agencies.

The Company records revenue from product sales in the technology operating segment when title and risk of loss are passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s shipping terms typically specify F.O.B. destination, at which time title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. At the time of sale of hardware products, the Company records an estimate for sales returns and allowances based on historical experience. Hardware products sold by the Company are warranted by the vendor.

The Company has drop-shipment arrangements with many of its hardware vendors and suppliers to deliver products directly to customers. Revenue for drop-shipment arrangements is recorded on a gross basis upon delivery to the customer with contract terms that typically specify F.O.B. destination. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis, as the Company is the principal in the transaction, as the primary obligor in the arrangement, assumes the inventory risk if the product is returned by the customer, sets the price of the product to the customer, assumes credit risk for the amounts invoiced, and works closely with the customers to determine their hardware specifications.

Freight billed to customers is recognized as net product revenue and the related freight costs as a cost of sales.

On certain occasions, the Company’s technology operating segment will enter into a bill and hold arrangement with a customer. When this occurs, the Company makes a determination as to when it will be the proper time to recognize revenue. In doing so, the Company takes the following into consideration:

For multiple-element arrangements in the Company’s technology operating segment that include hardware products, services and maintenance, the Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, the Company uses a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). VSOE generally exists only when the Company sells the deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by the Company for that deliverable. ESPs reflect the Company’s best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on the VSOE of each element, and if VSOE does not exist revenue is recognized when elements lacking VSOE are delivered.

Revenue from patent licensing is recognized if collectability is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and delivery of the service has been rendered. Currently, revenue arrangements related to intellectual property provide for the payment of contractually determined fees and other consideration for the grant of certain intellectual property rights related to the Company’s patents. These rights typically include some combination of the following: (i) the grant of a non-exclusive, retroactive and future license to manufacture and/or sell products covered by patents, (ii) the release of the licensee from certain claims, and (iii) the dismissal of any pending litigation. The intellectual property rights granted typically extend until the expiration of the related patents. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, the Company has no further obligation with respect to the grant of the non-exclusive retroactive and future licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other deliverables, including no express or implied obligation on the Company’s part to maintain or upgrade the related technology, or provide future support or services. Generally, the agreements provide for the grant of the licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other significant deliverables upon execution of the agreement, or upon receipt of the upfront payment. As such, the earnings process is complete and revenue is recognized upon the execution of the agreement, upon receipt of the upfront fee, and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

(d) Cost of sales

Cost of sales for the Company’s wellness operating segment consists of store-level costs. Store-level costs include all costs that are directly attributable to the store operations and include:

Cost of sales for the Company’s technology operating segment includes costs to acquire or manufacture goods for inventory.

Cost of sales for the Company’s intellectual property segment mainly includes expenses incurred in connection with the Company’s patent licensing and enforcement activities, patent-related legal expenses paid to external patent counsel (including contingent legal fees), licensing and enforcement related research, consulting and other expenses paid to third parties, as well as related internal payroll expenses.

(e) Recently adopted in 2016accounting pronouncements

ASU No. 2015-03, Imputation2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costsa Business

During

In January 2017, the six-month period ended June 30, 2016,FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01 (“ASU 2017-01”) “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 provides guidance to evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single asset or a group of similar assets, the assets acquired (or disposed of) are not considered a business. The Company adopted guidanceASU 2017-01 as of January 1, 2017 on a retrospective basis that requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a deduction from the carrying amount of such debt. As a result of this adoption, the Company reclassified $73 of debt issuance costs as of December 31, 2015 from other current assets to senior secured notes.prospective basis.

(f) Recent issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”) “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” ASU 2017-04 eliminates step two of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Going Concern

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016,goodwill impairment test and specifies that goodwill impairment should be measured by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Additionally, the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets should be disclosed. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted. The Company adoptedcurrently anticipates that the standard that provides guidance around management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The adoption of this guidance didASU 2017-04 will not have a material effectimpact on the Company’s condensedits consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2014-16, DerivativesNo. 2017-09, Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting

In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-09 (“ASU 2017-09”) “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment aware require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardless of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under the amendments in this update. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods, and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issuedinterim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently in the Formprocess of a Share is More Akin to Debt or to Equity

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the Company adopted the standard that clarifies how current U.S. GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and riskspotential impact of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensedits consolidated financial statements.

(d)(g) Reclassification

On November 27, 2015, the Company implemented the Reverse Stock Split, which became effective at the opening of trading on the NASDAQ on that date. As of November 27, 2015, every 10 shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one share of its common stock, except to the extent that the Reverse Stock Split resulted in any of the Company’s stockholders owning a fractional share, which was rounded up to the next highest whole share. In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, there was no change in the nominal par value per share of $0.01 and the Company’s authorized shares.

Certain balances have been reclassified to conform to presentation requirements, including consistent presentation of cost of sales and general and administrative expenses to retroactively present the effect of the Reverse Stock Split. All references to the number of shares of common stock, price per share and weighted average shares of common stock have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split on a retroactive basisalign presentation for all periods presented, unless otherwise noted.operating segments.

As a result of the adoption by the Company ofASU No. 2015-03on a retrospective basis, during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, the Company reclassified $73 of debt issuance costs as of December 31, 2015 from other current assets to senior secured notes.

(e) Intangible assets

Intangible assets include purchased patents, which are recorded based on the cost to acquire them, as well as trade names, customer relationships and technology, which were acquired as part of the acquisition of International Development Group Limited (“IDG”) in the fourth quarter of 2015 and are recorded based on the estimated fair value in purchase price allocation. The intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which are periodically evaluated for reasonableness.

The Company’s intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of the Company’s intangible assets, the Company must make estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether an impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any such charge. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant information. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. If these estimates or material related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges related to its intangible assets.

(f) Deferred revenue

Deferred revenue includes (i) payments received from customers in advance of providing the product and (ii) amounts deferred if other conditions of revenue recognition have not been met. The Company accounts for funds raised from crowdfunding campaigns and pre-sales as deferred revenue.

Note 3. Net Loss per Share of Common Stock

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock plus dilutive potential common stock considered outstanding during the period. However, as the Company generated net loss in all periods presented, some potentially dilutive securities, including certain warrants and stock options, were not reflected in diluted net loss per share because the impact of such instruments was anti-dilutive.

The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted net losslosses per share of common stock:

Note 4. Business Combination

On October 15, 2015,February 2, 2017, the Company acquired IDG. Pursuant toExcalibur, which is an end-to-end solutions provider of mobile hardware devices, wireless network security, data networking, telephony and mobile application development and software solutions. Following the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired 100% of the capital stock of IDG.acquisition, Excalibur was merged with Group Mobile and 70% of FLI Charge were also acquired throughwithin the purchase of IDG. Group Mobile is a company with full-service customer support in rugged computers, mobile devices and accessories. FLI Charge owns patented conductive wireless chargingCompany’s technology and is focused on innovation, sales, manufacturing and licensing its technology in various industries, such as automotive, furniture and others.operating segment.

AsIn consideration for the acquisition, the Company issued an equivalent of 1,666,667 common stock (after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split), which were issued as follows: (i) 1,604,167 shares of the Company’s newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”), convertible into 1,604,167888,573 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, (ii) 57,500 sharespar value $0.01 per share, to the former stockholders of Excalibur (the “Excalibur Sellers”). In addition, the Company’s unregistered common stock issued to one of the sellers, who is a former chief executive officer and director of IDG, in consideration of his forgiveness of debt and (iii) 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for transaction related services. A total of 240,625 Series B Preferred shares were placed in escrow to secure certain of the sellers’ indemnity obligations under the Purchase Agreement for a period of up to 12 months. On November 27, 2015, all Series B Preferred outstanding shares were converted into unregistered common stock of the Company, resultingExcalibur Sellers will, in the issuancethree years following the closing of 1,604,167 sharesthis transaction, also receive $500 for each $2,000 of common stock. On April 20, 2016, 85,121 sharesgross profit generated by a specified list of common stock were released from escrow.

Purchase consideration value was determined based on the market value ofExcalibur accounts annually, until such cumulative gross profit reaches $6,000, and an additional $500 when such cumulative profit reaches $10,000, such amounts are payable in either cash or the Company’s common stock, at the dateelection of the transactions, discounted for the fact that the shares are restricted as to their marketability for a period of six months from the issuance date.Company.

The transaction has been accounted for asfair value of the total purchase price is $2,125 and includes a business combination. fair value of contingent consideration of $316 and fair value of unregistered shares of common stock issued of $1,809.

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values atas of the closingacquisition date. The purchase price consideration was as follows:

The purchase price for the acquisition was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based on their fair values as of the closingacquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible assets and intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The table below presents preliminary allocation of the purchase price allocation was as follows:price:

The allocation of the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation andperformed using the Company's estimates and assumptions, which are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition dates)date). The principal area of potential purchase price adjustments relate to the shares placed in escrow.

In connection with the acquisition, the Company also entered into a Consulting Agreement with IDG’s former chief executive officer and director for a term of six months and payment of $9 per month. The Company also issued to a finder a warrant to purchase up to an aggregate of 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $5.00 per share, expiring on April 15, 2021. The fair value of the warrant was $114 and was recorded as an expense in general and administrative expenses.

On December 28, 2015, the Company acquired the remaining 30% interest in FLI Charge from third parties. In conjunction with the transaction, the Company issued 110,000 shares of its unregistered common stock for total consideration of $262. The fair value of the consideration for financial reporting purposes was determined based on the market value of the shares at the date of the transaction, discounted due to the restricted nature of the shares and the effect this has on their marketability. The issuance of these shares have no impact on the allocation of the purchase consideration pursuant toFASB ASC 810 and was recorded as an equity transaction.

Note 5. Intangible Assets

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s intangible assets, which consist of the following:

The Company recorded customer relationships, trade name and technology as part of the acquisition of Group Mobile and FLI Charge completed on October 15, 2015. Additionally, during 2016, the Company has capitalized costs for software related to the build-out of Group Mobile’s new website. Amortization has not been recorded for the software as it has not yet been placed into service. The patent assets consist of several major patent portfolios, which were acquired from third parties, as well as a number of internally-developed patents. The costs related to internally-developed patents are expensed as incurred.

The Company’s intangible assets are amortized over their expected useful lives. During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded amortization expense of $413 and $813, respectively. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded amortization expense of $1,264 and $1,617, respectively.

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2016, the Company determined that there were impairment indicators related to certain of its patents. A significant factor considered when making this determination occurred on May 6, 2016, when “Vringo, Inc.” changed its name to “FORM Holdings Corp.” and concurrently announced its repositioning as a holding company of small and middle market growth companies. The Company concluded that this factor was deemed a “triggering” event, which required the related patent assets to be tested for impairment. In performing this impairment test, the Company determined that the patent portfolios, which together represent an asset group, were subject to impairment testing. In the first step of the impairment test, the Company utilized its projections of future undiscounted cash flows based on the Company’s existing plans for the patents. As a result, it was determined that the Company’s projections of future undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying value of the asset group. Accordingly, the Company performed the second step of the impairment test to measure the impairment by calculating the asset group’s fair value as of May 6, 2016.

As a result, following amortization for the month of April, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $11,937, or 88.7% of the carrying value of the patents prior to impairment. This resulted in a new carrying value of $1,526 on May 6, 2016. The impairment charge is included in amortization and impairment of intangible assets in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Following the impairment, the Company reevaluated the remaining useful life and concluded that there were no changes in the estimated useful life. There were no impairment indicators related to any of the Company’s other amortizable intangible assets during the period ended June 30, 2016.

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s goodwill, which relates to the purchase of IDG completed on October 15, 2015. There were no indicators of impairment of goodwill as of June 30, 2016.

Note 6.5. Segment Information

The

Prior to January 1, 2017, the Company currently has threehad four operating segments,segments: XpresSpa, which was acquired on December 23, 2016, Group Mobile, FLI Charge and intellectual property that accumulate revenueproperty. Following the acquisitions of XpresSpa in December 2016 and expenses. Additionally,Excalibur in February 2017, the Company allocatesre-evaluated the operating segments and roles within the executive team to better align financial and human capital resources. The Company’s operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is regularly evaluated by the enterprise’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company concluded that it conducts its business through three operating segments, which are also its reportable segments: wellness, technology and intellectual property.

Segment operating results reflect losses before corporate and unallocated shared expenses, interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interests. Corporate and unallocated shared expenses principally consist of costs for corporate functions, rent for office space, stock-based compensation, executive management and certain expenses to itsunallocated administrative support functions.

General and administrative costs are allocated among the operating segments and non-operating corporate segment. The non-operating corporate segment represents generaldoes not have any revenue, but does incur expenses such as compensation expenses, rent and administrative expenses as well as netinfrastructure costs. The non-operating income (expense) that are not specific to any of FORM’s operating segments, but represent expenses incurred on behalf of the parent company, a holding company.

The corporate segment’s assets are mainly comprised of cash and cash equivalents.cash.

Note 7. Senior Secured Notes

The Company currently operates in two geographical segments: United States and all other countries. The following table represents the geographical revenue, segment operating loss, and total asset information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. There were no concentrations of geographical revenue, segment operating loss or total assets related to any single foreign country that were material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

On May 4, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain Investors in a registered direct offering of $12,500 of Notes and May 2015 Warrants to purchase 537,500 shares of the Company’s common stock (after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split). On the Closing Date, the Company issued the Notes, which were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $10.00 per share, had 8% interest and matured in 21 months from the date of issuance, unless earlier converted. In addition, the Company issued the May 2015 Warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which were exercisable at $10.00 per share for a period of five years, beginning on November 4, 2015. In connection with the issuance of the Notes and the May 2015 Warrants, the Company received net cash proceeds of $12,425. The Company also incurred third party costs directly associated with the issuance of Notes of $218, which were capitalized as debt issuance costs and reported as a reduction in senior secured notes, and are amortized over the term of the Note. The Company’s obligations under the outstanding Notes are secured by a first priority perfected security interest in substantially all of the Company’s U.S. assets. In addition, stock of certain subsidiaries of the Company were pledged. The outstanding Notes contain customary events of default, as well as covenants which include restrictions on the assumption of new debt by the Company. As of June 30, 2016, all covenants were met and there were no events of default.

As of December 31, 2015, total outstanding principal was $4,206. Between January 1, 2016 and March 9, 2016, the Company made two principal payments in the aggregate amount of $1,190. The Company elected to make these principal payments in shares of the Company’s common stock, which are issued at a 15% discount to the market price data. As such, the Company issued 1,032,332 shares in lieu of principal payments and recorded $210 as extinguishment of debt expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

On March 9, 2016, the Company and the Investors entered into the Exchange Note Agreement. Pursuant to the Exchange Note Agreement, the Company issued to the Investors an aggregate of 703,644 shares of its common stock in exchange for the reduction of $1,267 of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Notes and $49 of accrued interest. As a result, the outstanding aggregate principal amount under the Notes was reduced from $3,016 to $1,749 as of March 9, 2016.

In addition, on March 9, 2016, the Company, with the consent of each of the Investors, agreed to amend the Notes. Pursuant to the Amended Notes and the Indenture dated May 4, 2015, as supplemented by a First Supplemental Indenture dated May 4, 2015 and further supplemented by the Second Supplemental Indenture dated March 9, 2016: (i) the Amended Notes are no longer convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock and will be payable by the Company on the Maturity Date in cash only, (ii) the Maturity Date of the Amended Notes will extend to June 30, 2017, (iii) the Company will discontinue the payment of principal prior to the Maturity Date (subject to certain exceptions), (iv) the interest rate increased from 8% to 10% per annum and will accrue on the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Amended Notes, payable monthly, and (v) the Company will pay to the Investors on the Maturity Date 102% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Amended Notes. The Company also agreed to maintain a cash balance (including cash equivalents) of not less than $2,900.

In addition, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of the May 2015 Warrants from $10.00 to $3.00 per share and the parties also agreed to remove from the May 2015 Warrants certain anti-dilution features. Other terms of the May 2015 Warrants remained the same. Furthermore, in connection with the Amended Notes, the Company paid a restructuring fee of $50 to the Investors.

The Company has concluded that the Exchange Note Agreement does not constitute a troubled debt restructuring as it has not experienced financial difficulty. Furthermore, since the Investors remained the same before and after the Exchange Note Agreement, the Company has made a quantitative test, in order to determine whether the Amended Notes are substantially different from the original Notes.

Based on the accounting analysis performed and considering various scenarios for the cash flow test, the Company concluded that the Amended Notes were not substantially different from the original Notes and, as such, accounted for the Exchange Note Agreement as a modification:

The table below summarizes changes in the book value of the Notes from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016:

On July 1, 2016, the Company prepaid in full its Amended Notes that were due on June 30, 2017. As required by the terms of the Amended Notes, notice of prepayment was delivered to the Investors on June 30, 2016. The Company repaid the Amended Notes in full, including repayment of the principal and accrued interest as well as an additional 15% for early repayment. The Company used an aggregate of $2,011 of cash on hand for repayment of the Amended Notes. As a result of the repayment in full of the Amended Notes, all liens on the Company’s assets, including its intellectual property, were released by the Investors.

Note 8.6. Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015:2016:

The Company measures its derivative liabilities at fair value. The May 2015 Warrants were classified within Level 3 because they were valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton model, which utilizes significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. They are recorded asThese derivative warrant liabilities as they are freestanding instruments and there are several features within the warrants that may require the Company to cash settle or partially cash settle. In particular, the Company may have to cash settle, partially cash settle, or make cash payments to the Investors including cash settlement upon exercise when insufficient shares are authorized to be issued, and that the Company is obligated to issue registered shares when the warrants are exercised. The derivative warrant liabilities arewere initially measured at fair value and are marked to market at each balance sheet date.

In addition to the above, the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016, consisted of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable deposits and Notes.Debt. The carrying amounts of all the aforementioned financial instruments approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the six-monththree month period ended June 30, 2016:March 31, 2017:

Valuation processes for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurement of the derivative warrant liabilities falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value measurements are evaluated by management to ensure that changes are consistent with expectations of management based upon the sensitivity and nature of the inputs.

June 30,March 31, 2017:

December 31, 2016:

December 31, 2015:

Sensitivity of Level 3 measurements to changes in significant unobservable inputs

The inputs to estimate the fair value of the Company’s derivative warrant liabilities and conversion feature were the current market price of the Company’s common stock, the exercise price of the warrants and conversion feature,derivative warrant liabilities, their remaining expected term, the volatility of the Company’s common stock price and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term. Significant changes in any of those inputs in isolation can result in a significant change in the fair value measurement.

Generally, an increase in the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock, an increase in the volatility of the Company’s shares of common stock, and an increase in the remaining term of the warrants and conversion featurederivative warrant liabilities would each result in a directionally similar change in the estimated fair value of the Company’s warrants.derivative warrant liabilities. Such changes would increase the associated liability while decreases in these assumptions would decrease the associated liability. An increase in the risk-free interest rate or a decrease in the differential between the warrants’ and conversion feature’sderivative warrant liabilities’ exercise pricesprice and the market price of the Company’s shares of common stock would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value measurement and thus a decrease in the associated liability. The Company has not, and does not plan to, declare dividends on its common stock, and as such, there is no change in the estimated fair value of the warrants and conversion featurederivative warrant liabilities due to the dividend assumption.