UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
———————
FORM 10-Q
þ☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017March 31, 2018
¨☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-36362
———————
BioLife Solutions, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
———————
DELAWARE | 94-3076866 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
3303 MONTE VILLA PARKWAY, SUITE 310, BOTHELL, WASHINGTON, 98021
(Address of registrant’s principal executive offices, Zip Code)
(425) 402-1400
(Telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ☑ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (S232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post said files). Yes þ☑ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”filer”, “accelerated filer,”filer”, “smaller reporting company,”company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨☐ Accelerated filer ¨☐ Non-accelerated filer ¨☐ Smaller reporting company þ
☑
Emerging Growth Company ¨☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨☐ No þ☑
As of August 9, 2017, 13,228,046May 8, 2018, 15,104,743 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2017MARCH 31, 2018
3 | ||
Item 1. | 3 | |
| 3 | |
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 12 |
Item 3. | 16 | |
Item 4. | 16 | |
PART II. | 16 | |
Item 6. | 16 | |
17 | ||
18 |
2 |
BioLife Solutions, Inc.
(Unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,314,633 | $ | 1,405,826 | $ | 7,032,513 | $ | 6,663,318 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,913 and $0 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 1,173,036 | 1,193,646 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,575 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 | 1,043,815 | 1,021,315 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories | 1,769,070 | 1,757,784 | 1,836,666 | 1,846,746 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 422,408 | 270,814 | 330,904 | 399,502 | ||||||||||||
Total current assets | 5,679,147 | 4,628,070 | 10,243,898 | 9,930,881 | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment | ||||||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,284,491 | 1,284,491 | 1,284,491 | 1,284,491 | ||||||||||||
Furniture and computer equipment | 681,096 | 650,912 | 692,270 | 682,466 | ||||||||||||
Manufacturing and other equipment | 1,061,791 | 922,220 | 1,194,659 | 1,148,006 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal | 3,027,378 | 2,857,623 | 3,171,420 | 3,114,963 | ||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation | (1,846,496 | ) | (1,670,245 | ) | (2,084,769 | ) | (2,008,927 | ) | ||||||||
Net property and equipment | 1,180,882 | 1,187,378 | 1,086,651 | 1,106,036 | ||||||||||||
Investment in SAVSU | 1,585,527 | 2,075,000 | 926,364 | 1,070,120 | ||||||||||||
Long term deposits | 36,166 | 36,166 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term deposits | 36,166 | 36,166 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 8,481,722 | $ | 7,926,614 | $ | 12,293,079 | $ | 12,143,203 | ||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 531,919 | $ | 710,719 | $ | 586,334 | $ | 690,702 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 63,619 | 116,399 | 202,779 | 200,548 | ||||||||||||
Accrued compensation | 286,063 | 175,829 | 392,248 | 491,432 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest, related party | 33,274 | –– | ||||||||||||||
Deferred rent | 130,216 | 130,216 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred rent, current portion | 130,216 | 130,216 | ||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 1,045,091 | 1,133,163 | 1,311,577 | 1,512,898 | ||||||||||||
Promissory note payable to related party, net of discount of $155,996 at December 31, 2016 | –– | 2,844,004 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest, related party | –– | 97,857 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred rent, long-term | 559,532 | 685,450 | 457,518 | 492,207 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 56,141 | –– | 52,520 | 45,512 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 1,660,764 | 4,760,474 | 1,821,615 | 2,050,617 | ||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) | ||||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8) | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, Series A, 4,250 shares designated, and 4,250 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 4 | –– | ||||||||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized, 13,210,015 and 12,863,824 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | 13,210 | 12,864 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, Series A, 4,250 shares designated, and 4,250 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized, 14,145,413 and 14,021,422 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively | 14,145 | 14,021 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 79,676,523 | 74,355,645 | 84,517,966 | 84,036,444 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (72,868,779 | ) | (71,202,369 | ) | (74,060,651 | ) | (73,957,883 | ) | ||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 6,820,958 | 3,166,140 | 10,471,464 | 10,092,586 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 8,481,722 | $ | 7,926,614 | $ | 12,293,079 | $ | 12,143,203 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3 |
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Month Period Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Product sales | $ | 2,557,765 | $ | 1,989,988 | $ | 4,923,966 | $ | 3,842,005 | ||||||||||||||||
Product revenue | $ | 3,814,882 | $ | 2,366,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of product sales | 956,839 | 872,835 | 1,885,241 | 1,643,840 | 1,363,829 | 928,402 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 1,600,926 | 1,117,153 | 3,038,725 | 2,198,165 | 2,451,053 | 1,437,799 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 318,607 | 599,031 | 605,358 | 1,103,270 | 346,454 | 286,751 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 546,455 | 849,193 | 1,058,399 | 1,583,106 | 611,502 | 511,944 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 1,077,067 | 1,262,818 | 2,180,210 | 2,598,110 | 1,353,377 | 1,103,143 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,942,129 | 2,711,042 | 3,843,967 | 5,284,486 | 2,311,333 | 1,901,838 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating loss | (341,203 | ) | (1,593,889 | ) | (805,242 | ) | (3,086,321 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 139,720 | (464,039 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses), net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 76 | 445 | 124 | 2,364 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, related party | (104,582 | ) | (8,333 | ) | (187,915 | ) | (8,333 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income | 8,418 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense | (900 | ) | (83,333 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | (62,398 | ) | (31,199 | ) | (155,996 | ) | (31,199 | ) |
| — | (93,598 | ) | ||||||||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | –– | (86,736 | ) | –– | (86,736 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from equity-method investment in SAVSU | (260,105 | ) | –– | (489,473 | ) | –– | (143,756 | ) | (229,368 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses), net | (427,009 | ) | (125,823 | ) | (833,260 | ) | (123,904 | ) | (136,238 | ) | (406,251 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss | (768,212 | ) | (1,719,712 | ) | (1,638,502 | ) | (3,210,225 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | –– | 363,629 | –– | 627,314 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BioLife Solutions, Inc. | $ | (768,212 | ) | $ | (1,356,083 | ) | $ | (1,638,502 | ) | $ | (2,582,911 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 3,482 | (870,290 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Preferred stock dividends | (106,250 | ) |
| — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (102,768 | ) | $ | (870,290 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to BioLife Solutions, Inc. | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.21 | ) | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares used to calculate net loss per common share | 13,100,820 | 12,568,041 | 13,033,106 | 12,512,949 | 14,098,610 | 12,964,639 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4 |
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossCash Flows
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (768,212 | ) | $ | (1,719,712 | ) | $ | (1,638,502 | ) | $ | (3,210,225 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments | –– | –– | –– | 451 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income | –– | –– | –– | 451 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | (768,212 | ) | (1,719,712 | ) | (1,638,502 | ) | (3,209,774 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to non- Controlling interest | –– | 363,629 | –– | 627,314 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to BioLife Solutions, Inc. | $ | (768,212 | ) | $ | (1,356,083 | ) | $ | (1,638,502 | ) | $ | (2,582,460 | ) |
Three Month Period Ended | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,482 | $ | (870,290 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | ||||||||
Depreciation | 77,823 | 89,549 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 373,425 | 329,895 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred rent related to lease incentives | (31,749 | ) | (31,750 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt discount | — | 93,598 | ||||||
Loss from equity-method investment in SAVSU | 143,756 | 229,368 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities | ||||||||
(Increase) Decrease in | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, trade | (22,500 | ) | 132,873 | |||||
Inventories | 10,080 | (54,388 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 11,598 | (138,029 | ) | |||||
Increase (Decrease) in | ||||||||
Accounts payable | (68,743 | ) | (11,970 | ) | ||||
Accrued compensation and other current liabilities | (102,643 | ) | 41,447 | |||||
Accrued interest, related party | — | 83,333 | ||||||
Deferred rent | (2,940 | ) | (62,984 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 391,589 | (169,348 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (40,834 | ) | (37,152 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (40,834 | ) | (37,152 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from note payable | — | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Payments on equipment loan | (1,635 | ) | ||||||
Payments on capital lease obligation | (3,271 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants | 129,596 | 120,000 | ||||||
Payments of preferred stock dividends | (106,250 | ) | — | |||||
Deferred costs related to security issuance | — | (29,400 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 18,440 | 1,090,600 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 369,195 | 884,100 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period | 6,663,318 | 1,405,826 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period | $ | 7,032,513 | $ | 2,289,926 | ||||
Non-cash financing activity | ||||||||
Stock issued for services provided in prior period included in liabilities at year-end | $ | 35,625 | $ | 35,624 | ||||
Purchase of equipment with debt | $ | 17,604 | — | |||||
Series A preferred stock dividends accrued not yet paid | $ | 106,250 | — | |||||
Deferred costs related to security issuance not yet paid as of quarter end | — | $ | 7,856 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5 |
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC.
BioLife Solutions, Inc.Notes to Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Six Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,638,502 | ) | $ | (3,210,225 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities | ||||||||
Depreciation | 176,251 | 183,893 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 643,768 | 402,763 | ||||||
Stock issued for services | 35,625 | –– | ||||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs | –– | 86,736 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred rent related to lease incentives | (63,499 | ) | (63,499 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt discount | 155,996 | 31,199 | ||||||
Accretion and amortization on available for sale investments | –– | 1,792 | ||||||
Loss from equity-method investment in SAVSU | 489,473 | –– | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities | ||||||||
(Increase) Decrease in | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, trade | 20,610 | (354,726 | ) | |||||
Inventories | (11,286 | ) | (76,094 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (135,905 | ) | (50,151 | ) | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in | ||||||||
Accounts payable | (124,239 | ) | 207,369 | |||||
Accrued compensation and other current liabilities | 56,442 | 37,527 | ||||||
Accrued interest, related party | 185,417 | 8,333 | ||||||
Deferred rent | (62,419 | ) | 19,929 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (272,268 | ) | (2,775,154 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Sales of available-for-sale investments | –– | 1,650,000 | ||||||
Costs associated with internal use software development | –– | (695,044 | ) | |||||
Purchase of property and equipment | (78,185 | ) | (99,353 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (78,185 | ) | 855,603 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from related party debt | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Payments on equipment loan | (8,176 | ) | –– | |||||
Payments on capital lease obligations | (4,360 | ) | –– | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants | 314,024 | 151,498 | ||||||
Deferred costs related to potential stock issuance | (42,228 | ) | (86,736 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,259,260 | 1,064,762 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 908,807 | (854,789 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period | 1,405,826 | 2,173,258 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period | $ | 2,314,633 | $ | 1,318,469 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities | ||||||||
Costs incurred for capitalized internal use software not paid as of quarter end (amounts are included in liabilities) | $ | –– | $ | 42,760 | ||||
Stock issued for services provided in prior period included in liabilities at year-end | 35,624 | –– | ||||||
Preferred stock issued on conversion of related party note payable and accrued interest | 4,250,000 | –– | ||||||
Preferred stock issuance costs not yet paid | 8,038 | –– | ||||||
Capital lease obligations incurred for purchases of equipment | 52,327 | –– | ||||||
Purchase of equipment with debt | 39,243 | –– | ||||||
Debt discount related to warrants | $ | –– | $ | 374,390 |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
BioLife Solutions, Inc.1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Business
Business
BioLife Solutions, Inc. (“BioLife,” “us,” “we,” “our,” or the “Company”) is a developer, manufacturer and marketer of proprietary clinical grade cell and tissue hypothermic storage and cryopreservation freeze media. Our proprietary HypoThermosol® and CryoStor® platform of solutions are highly valued in the biobanking, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine markets. Our biopreservation media products are serum-free and protein-free, fully defined, and are formulated to reduce preservation-induced cell damage and death. Our enabling technology provides commercial companies and clinical researchers significant improvement in shelf life and post-preservation viability and function of cells, tissues, and organs. Additionally, for our direct, distributor, and contract customers, we perform custom formulation, fill, and finish services.
Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Pursuant to these rules and regulations, we have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures we normally include in our annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In management’s opinion, we have made all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Our interim period operating results do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. These consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 2017 on file with the SEC.
There have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Principles2017, except the adoption of ConsolidationAccounting Standards Update (ASU) No.2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).
The consolidatedSignificant Accounting Policies Update
Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No.2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) using the modified retrospective approach applied to those contracts in effect as of January 1, 2018. Under this transition method, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under the new standard, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historical accounting under Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Adoption of the new standard did not have an impact on the amounts reported in our financial statements and there were no other significant changes impacting the timing or measurement of our revenue or our business processes and controls.
To determine revenue recognition for contractual arrangements that we determine are within the scope of Topic 606, we perform the following five steps: (i) identify each contract with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to our performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy the relevant performance obligation. We only apply the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that we will collect the consideration we are entitled to in exchange for the threegoods or services we transfer to the customer. Our revenues are primarily generated from the sale of our biopreservation media products. We generally recognize product revenue, including shipping and six months ended June 30, 2016 includehandling charges billed to customers, when we transfer control of our products to our customers as our contracts have a single performance obligation (transfer of control generally occurs upon shipment of our product). We are not required to disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations as our contracts have a duration of one year or less.
We invoice and receive payment from our customers after we recognize revenue, resulting in receivables from our customers that are presented as accounts receivable on our balance sheet. Accounts receivable consist of short-term amounts due from our customers (generally 30 to 90 days) and are stated at the amount we expect to collect. We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on our assessment of the Companycollectability of specific customer accounts. Changes in accounts receivable are primarily due to the timing and its majority-owned subsidiary. All intercompany balancesmagnitude of orders of our products, the timing of when control of our products is transferred to our customers and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The subsidiary was deconsolidated asthe timing of December 31, 2016 and thus the financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 only include accounts of the Company.cash collections.
Equity Method Investments
We account for our 45% ownership in SAVSUour biologistex CCM, LLC joint venture (“SAVSU”) using the equity method of accounting. This method states that if the investment provides us the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee, we account for the investment under the equity method. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if the Company’s ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee ranges between 20% and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investee’s board of directors, are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is recorded at its initial carrying value in the consolidated balance sheet and is periodically adjusted for capital contributions, dividends received and our share of the investee’s earnings or losses together with other-than-temporary impairments which are recorded as a component of other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. Our ownership was effectively reduced from 35% to 26.7% during the three months ended March 31, 2018 due to additional cash contributions made by the majority owner, SAVSU Technologies LLC. For the three and six months ended June 30, March 31, 2018 and 2017, SAVSU’s net loss totaled $578,012$538,413 and $1,087,718$509,706, of which our 45% ownership resulted in a $260,105$143,756 and $489,473$229,368 loss, respectively which was recorded as “Loss from equity-method investment in SAVSU.”
Concentrations of credit risk and business risk
In the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, no customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue. In each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, March 31, 2018, we derived approximately 12%30% of our product revenue from one customer. two customers. In the three months ended March 31, 2017, we derived approximately 21% of our product revenue from two customers. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.March 31, 2018 or 2017. At June 30, 2017, threeMarch 31, 2018, two customers accounted for approximately 41%34% of total gross accounts receivable. At December 31, 2016, three2017, two customers accounted for approximately 45%41% of total gross accounts receivable.
Revenue from customers located in foreign countries represented 14%13% and 18%22% of total revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, March 31, 2018 and 17% and 20% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively. All revenue from foreign customers are denominated in United States dollars.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15,2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (ASU 2016-15)2016-15). The updated guidance clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-15 is required for fiscal reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018, with early adoption being permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have ano material impact on our financial statements.
In MarchFebruary 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU-2016-09). The updated guidance simplifies and changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification of certain items in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU-2016-09 at the beginning of the first quarter of 2017. Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 an accounting policy change was made to account for forfeitures as they occur and not estimated. No other material changes resulted from adopting ASU 2016-09. We used the modified retrospective method for this adoption.
The table below shows the accumulated deficit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2017:
Accumulative deficit | ||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2016 | $ | (71,202,369 | ) | |
Cumulative-effect adjustment resulting from adoption of ASU 2016-09 | (27,908 | ) | ||
Net loss | (1,638,502 | ) | ||
BALANCE, June 30, 2017 | $ | (72,868,779 | ) |
In February 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,2016-02, Leases: Topic 842 (ASU 2016-02)2016-02) that replaces existing lease guidance. The new standard is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Under the new guidance, leases will continue to be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged under ASU 2016-02.2016-02. Adoption of ASU 2016-022016-02 is required for fiscal reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years with early adoption being permitted. The new standard is required to be applied with a modified retrospective approach to each prior reporting period presented with various optional practical expedients. TheWhile the Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the pendingexpects adoption of ASU 2016-022016-02 to lead to a material increase in the assets and liabilities recorded on its Balance Sheet, the Company is still evaluating the overall impact on its financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01,2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities: Topic 825 (ASU 2016-01)2016-01). The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial instruments, which includes amendments to address aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. Adoption of ASU 2016-01 is required for fiscal reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect adoption of ASU 2016-01 to have aWe adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018, with no material impact on itsour financial statements.
In November 2015, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes: Topic 740 (ASU 2015-17). Current GAAP requires the deferred taxes for each jurisdiction to be presented as a net current asset or liability and net noncurrent asset or liability. This requires a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis based on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which the underlying temporary differences relate, or, in the case of loss or credit carryforwards, based on the period in which the attribute is expected to be realized. Any valuation allowance is then required to be allocated on a pro rata basis, by jurisdiction, between current and noncurrent deferred tax assets. The new guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. As a result, each jurisdiction will now only have one net noncurrent deferred tax asset or liability. The guidance does not change the existing requirement that only permits offsetting within a jurisdiction. The Company adopted ASU-2015-17 at the beginning of the first quarter of 2017 which had no significant impact on the financial statements as the net deferred tax assets are fully reserved.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory: Topic 330 (ASU 2015-11). Topic 330 currently requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. ASU 2015-11 requires that inventory measured using either the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost method be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The Company adopted ASU-2015-11 at the beginning of the first quarter of 2017 which had no significant impact on the financial statements.
On May 28, 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Topic 606, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. The updated standard becomes effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Based on our analysis thus far, we believe the impact of adopting the new guidance will be immaterial to our annual and interim financial statements. The Company will also be required to make additional disclosures under the new guidance. We continue to assess the impact on all areas of our revenue recognition, disclosure requirements, and changes that may be necessary to our internal controls over financial reporting. We will adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2018.
With the exception of the new standards discussed above, there have been no new accounting pronouncements not yet effective that have significance, or potential significance, to our financial statements.Financial Statements.
2.Fair Value Measurement
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” (“ASC Topic 820”), the Company measures its cash and cash equivalents and short termshort-term investments at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC Topic 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tierthree-tier value fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 – Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
As of June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016, 2017, the Company does not have liabilities that are measured at fair value.
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016,2017, based on the three-tierthree-tier fair value hierarchy:
As of June 30, 2017 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||||
Bank deposits | $ | 2,261,474 | $ | — | $ | 2,261,474 | ||||||
Money market funds | 53,159 | — | 53,159 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2,314,633 | — | 2,314,633 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 2,314,633 | $ | — | $ | 2,314,633 |
As of December 31, 2016 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||||
Bank deposits | $ | 1,352,541 | $ | — | $ | 1,352,541 | ||||||
Money market funds | 53,285 | — | 53,285 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,405,826 | — | 1,405,826 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 1,405,826 | $ | — | $ | 1,405,826 |
As of March 31, 2018 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||||
Bank deposits | $ | 6,979,336 | $ | — | $ | 6,979,336 | ||||||
Money market funds | 53,177 | — | 53,177 | |||||||||
Total Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,032,513 | $ | — | $ | 7,032,513 |
As of December 31, 2017 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | |||||||||
Bank deposits | $ | 6,610,183 | $ | — | $ | 6,610,183 | ||||||
Money market funds | 53,135 | — | 53,135 | |||||||||
Total Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 6,663,318 | $ | — | $ | 6,663,318 |
The fair values of bank deposits and money market funds classified as Level 1 were derived from quoted market prices as active markets for these instruments exist. The Company has no level 2 or level 3 financial assets. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. 2017.
3. Inventory
Inventory consists of the following at June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 298,337 | $ | 531,053 | $ | 573,331 | $ | 582,816 | ||||||||
Work in progress | 337,635 | 370,740 | 517,027 | 453,890 | ||||||||||||
Finished goods | 1,133,098 | 855,991 | 746,308 | 810,040 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,769,070 | $ | 1,757,784 | $ | 1,836,666 | $ | 1,846,746 |
4.Deferred Rent
Deferred rent consists of the following at June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||
Landlord-funded leasehold improvements | $ | 1,124,790 | $ | 1,124,790 | $ | 1,124,790 | $ | 1,124,790 | ||||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (566,026 | ) | (502,527 | ) | (661,274 | ) | (629,525 | ) | ||||||||
Total | 558,764 | 622,263 | 463,516 | 495,265 | ||||||||||||
Straight line rent adjustment | 130,984 | 193,403 | 124,218 | 127,158 | ||||||||||||
Total deferred rent | $ | 689,748 | $ | 815,666 | $ | 587,734 | $ | 622,423 |
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, March 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $31,750$31,749 and $63,499, respectively, in deferred rent amortization of these landlord funded leasehold improvements. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded $31,749 and $63,499,$31,750, respectively, in deferred rent amortization of these landlord funded leasehold improvements.
Straight line rent adjustment represents the difference between cash rent payments and the recognition of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the lease.
5.Share-based Compensation
Service Vesting-Based Stock Options
The following is a summary of service vesting based related stock option activity for the sixthree month period ended June 30, 2017, March 31, 2018, and the status of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2017:March 31, 2018:
Six Month Period Ended | Three Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
Wtd. Avg. | Wtd. Avg. | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Options | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 2,513,861 | $ | 1.78 | 2,390,012 | $ | 1.85 | ||||||||||
Granted | 110,000 | $ | 1.79 | — | $ | N/A | ||||||||||
Exercised | (131,427 | ) | $ | 1.17 | (62,438 | ) | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
Forfeited | (47,783 | ) | $ | 3.59 | (730 | ) | $ | 2.62 | ||||||||
Expired | (91,068 | ) | $ | 1.45 | — | $ | N/A | |||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2017 | 2,353,583 | $ | 1.79 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2018 | 2,326,844 | $ | 1.87 | |||||||||||||
Stock options exercisable at June 30, 2017 | 1,402,185 | $ | 1.71 | |||||||||||||
Stock options exercisable at March 31, 2018 | 1,637,951 | $ | 1.76 |
Performance-based Stock Options
The Company’s Board of Directors has implemented a Management Performance Bonus Plan for 2017. Based on achieving varying levels of specified revenue for the year ending December 31, 2017, up to 1,000,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock may be vested. The options have an exercise price of $1.64, and if revenue levels are met, vest 50% on the release of the Company’s audited financial statements for 2017, and 50% one year thereafter. If the minimum performance targets are not achieved, no options will vest. The Company currently deems it probable that the 1,000,000 options will vest and is recognizingWe recognized stock compensation for theseexpense of $152,703 and $170,323 related to service vesting-based options overduring the requisite service period.
three month periods ending March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, March 31, 2018, there was $2,280,077$7,640,555 of aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding service vesting-based stock options, including $1,063,392$5,551,232 of aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable service vesting-based stock options. Intrinsic value is the total pretax intrinsic value for all “in-the-money” options (i.e., the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the quarter and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2017. March 31, 2018. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock. During the three quarters ended March 31, 2018 and six months ended June 30, 2017 intrinsic value of service vesting-based awards exercised was $21,104$270,241 and $91,817,$70,714, respectively. Weighted average grant date fair value for service based-vesting options granted during the sixthree months ended June 30,March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 was $1.13none and $1.13 per share, and $1.24 and $1.25respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual life of service vesting-based options at March 31, 2018, is 6.1 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost of service vesting-based stock options at March 31, 2018 of $1,019,680 is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years.
Performance-based Stock Options
The Company’s Board of Directors implemented a Management Performance Bonus Plan for 2017. Based on achieving varying levels of specified revenue for the threeyear ending December 31, 2017, up to 1,000,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock may be vested. The options have an exercise price of $1.64, and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Thereif revenue levels for 2017 were met, would vest 50% on the release of the Company’s audited financial statements for 2017, and 50%one year thereafter. If the minimum performance targets are not achieved, no options granted in would vest. On February 27, 2018, the three months ended June 30, 2017.Company’s Board of Directors determined that, subject to the completion of the 2017 audit, the specified revenue target had been achieved. Accordingly, 999,997 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock vested as follows: 50% of the options vested on March 8, 2018 and the remaining 50% will vest on March 8, 2019.
We recognized stock compensation expense of $125,507 and $125,508 related to performance-based options during the three month periods ending March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of March 31, 2018, there was $3,489,990 of aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding performance-based stock options, including $1,745,003 of aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable performance-based stock options. Intrinsic value is the total pretax intrinsic value for all “in-the-money” options (i.e., the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the quarter and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on March 31, 2018. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock. During the quarters ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 there were no performance-based awards exercised. The weighted average remaining contractual life of performance-based options at March 31, 2018, is 3.7 years. Total unrecognized compensation cost of performance-based stock options at March 31, 2018 of $383,493 is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.75 years.
The fair value of share-based payments made with stock options to employees and non-employee directors wasis estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model using the following weighted average assumptions.assumptions (N/A for 2018 as no options were granted in that period).
Three Month Period Ended | Six Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
Risk free interest rate | N/A | 1.45 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.52 | % | |||||||||
Dividend yield | N/A | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Expected term (in years) | N/A | 7.00 | 5.18 | 7.00 | ||||||||||||
Volatility | N/A | 75 | % | 75 | % | 75 | % |
Three Month Period Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Risk free interest rate | N/A | 2.07 | % | |||||
Dividend yield | N/A | 0.0 | % | |||||
Expected term (in years) | N/A | 5.18 | ||||||
Volatility | N/A | 75 | % |
We recognized stock compensation expense
Restricted Stock
The following is a summary of restricted stock activity for the sixthree month period ended June 30, 2017, March 31, 2018, and the status of unvested restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2017:March 31, 2018:
Six Month Period Ended | Three Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||
Number of Restricted Shares | Grant-Date Fair Value | Number of | Grant-Date | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 98,439 | $ | 1.90 | |||||||||||||
Unvested outstanding at beginning of year | 237,926 | $ | 1.79 | |||||||||||||
Granted | 207,350 | $ | 1.76 | 161,768 | $ | 6.00 | ||||||||||
Vested | (32,813 | ) | $ | 1.90 | (55,613 | ) | $ | 1.78 | ||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2017 | 272,976 | $ | 1.79 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited | (6,100 | ) | $ | 1.76 | ||||||||||||
Unvested outstanding at March 31, 2018 | 337,981 | $ | 3.80 |
The aggregate fair value of the awards granted during the three and six months ended June 30, March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $0$970,608 and $364,936, respectively, and during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was $0 and $380,000,$364,936, respectively, which represents the market value of ourBioLife common stock on the date that the restricted stock awards were granted. The aggregate fair value of the restricted stock awards that vested was $307,058 and $41,097for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, and 2016 was $20,123 and $21,704, respectively and for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $61,157 and $116,704, respectively.
We recognized stock compensation expense of $40,432$95,215 and $23,633$34,064 related to restricted stock awards for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively and $74,496 and $122,351 related to restricted stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, March 31, 2018, there was $447,965$1,208,936 in unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock awards. We expect to recognize those costs over 3.13.4 years.
We recorded total stock compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and 2016,2017, as follows:
Three Month Period Ended | Six Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
Research and development costs | $ | 58,815 | $ | 47,366 | $ | 118,080 | $ | 84,835 | ||||||||
Sales and marketing costs | 58,051 | 54,748 | 117,670 | 118,247 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative costs | 154,983 | 142,367 | 323,181 | 219,878 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product sales | 42,024 | 11,754 | 84,837 | (20,197 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 313,873 | $ | 256,235 | $ | 643,768 | $ | 402,763 |
Management adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017 and no longer applies an estimated forfeiture rate. As a result, we had a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings and additional paid in capital of $27,908 resulting from adoption. The estimated forfeiture rate derived from historical employee termination data applied for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately 8.1%.
Three Month Period Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Research and development costs | $ | 65,595 | $ | 59,265 | ||||
Sales and marketing costs | 68,513 | 59,619 | ||||||
General and administrative costs | 190,949 | 168,198 | ||||||
Cost of product sales | 48,368 | 42,813 | ||||||
Total | $ | 373,425 | $ | 329,895 |
6. Warrants
At June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2016, 2017, we had 7,460,2836,676,849 and 7,603,1416,688,849 warrants outstanding, respectively and exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $4.53 and $4.46, respectively. The outstanding warrants have expiration dates between March 2021 and May 2021.$4.50 at the end of each period. During the three month period ended June 30, 2017, 142,858March 31, 2018, 12,000 warrants were exercised with a weighted average exercise price of $1.12.$4.75, yielding $57,000 in proceeds to the Company in which the stock was issued April 3, 2018. Subsequent to quarter end through May 8, 2018, an additional 920,116 warrants were exercised with a weighted average exercise price of $4.75, yielding $4.4 million in proceeds to the Company.
7. Net Loss per Common Share
Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents are excluded for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and 2016,2017, since the effect is anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net losses.losses attributable to common stockholders. Common stock equivalents include stock options, warrants and warrants.unvested restricted stock.
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding, and the potentially dilutive securities excluded from loss per share computations because they are anti-dilutive, are as follows as of June 30, 2017 March 31, 2018 and 2016,2017, respectively:
Three Month Period Ended | Six Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Three Month Period Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted weighted average common stock shares outstanding | 13,100,820 | 12,568,041 | 13,033,106 | 12,512,949 | 14,098,610 | 12,964,639 | ||||||||||||||||||
Potentially dilutive securities excluded from loss per share computations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock options | 3,353,583 | 2,731,613 | 3,353,583 | 2,731,613 | 3,326,841 | 3,387,581 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock purchase warrants | 7,460,283 | 7,745,997 | 7,460,283 | 7,745,997 | 6,676,849 | 7,603,141 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock unvested | 272,976 | 137,502 | 272,976 | 137,502 | 337,981 | 282,350 |
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
We lease approximately 30,000 square feet in our Bothell, Washington headquarters. The term of our lease continues until July 31, 2021 with two options to extend the term of the lease, each of which is for an additional period of five years, with the first extension term commencing, if at all, on August 1, 2021, and the second extension term commencing, if at all, immediately following the expiration of the first extension term. In accordance with the amended lease agreement, our monthly base rent is approximately $57,000$58,000 at June 30, 2017, March 31, 2018, with scheduled annual increases each August and again in October for the most recent amendment. We are also required to pay an amount equal to the Company’s proportionate share of certain taxes and operating expenses.
Employment agreements
We have employment agreements with theour Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Vice President of Operations, Vice President of Marketing, and Vice President of Sales. None of these employment agreements is for a definitive period, but rather each will continue indefinitely until terminated in accordance with its terms. The agreements provide for a base annual salary, payable in monthly (or shorter) installments. In addition, the agreement with the Chief Executive Officer provides for incentive bonuses at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Under certain conditions and for certain of these officers, we may be required to pay additional amounts upon terminating the officer or upon the officer resigning for good reason.
Litigation
From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business, none of which are currently material to the Company’s business.
On June 30, 2017, we modified our existing credit facility withWAVI Holding AG, ("WAVI"), a principal stockholder of the Company. Pursuant to the modification, WAVI agreed to exchange its existing credit facility, including $4.25 million of principal and accrued interest outstanding as of June 1, 2017, for 4,250 shares of the Company's Series A9. Preferred Stock which has
As of March 31, 2018, we accrued a fixed, aggregate stated value of $4.25 million. The preferred shares being issued to WAVI are not convertible into any other form of equity and can only be redeemed at the stated value of $4.25 million at times and in amounts solely determined by the Company. The preferred shares also carry an annual cash dividend of 10% of the outstanding stated value, calculated and payable in arrears on a quarterly basis. The preferred shares have a liquidation preference over the common shareholders. No additional consideration was provided to WAVI for entering into this agreement. The exchange resulted in no gain or loss on the transaction. In both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 we did not pay or accrue any dividends$106,250 on the preferred stock.stock which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the balance sheet at March 31, 2018. The dividend was paid subsequent to quarter end on April 2, 2018.
10.Revenue
We currently operate as one operating segment focusing on biopreservation media.
The following table disaggregates revenue by market segment and distributors:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Net product sales: | ||||||||
Regenerative medicine | $ | 2,103,552 | $ | 1,051,170 | ||||
Drug discovery | 376,975 | 277,914 | ||||||
BioBanking | 295,112 | 277,429 | ||||||
Distributors | 1,039,243 | 759,688 | ||||||
Total revenues | 3,814,882 | 2,366,201 |
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. We caution readers that any forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statement. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about future financial and operating results, plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, costs and expenses, interest rates, outcome of contingencies, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, business strategies, cost savings, objectives of management and other statements that are not historical facts. You can find many of these statements by looking for words like “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “could,” “plan,” “intend,” or similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Examples of these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
● | anticipated product developments, regulatory filings and related requirements; |
● | timing and amount of future contractual payments, product revenue |
● | market acceptance of our products and the estimated potential size of these markets; and |
● | projections regarding liquidity, capital requirements and the terms of any financing agreements. |
These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from current expectations and projections. These risks and uncertainties include those factors described in greater detail in the risk factors disclosed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017 filed with the SEC. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or, in the case of documents referred to or incorporated by reference, the date of those documents.
All subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable U.S. securities law. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.
Overview
Management’s discussion and analysis provides additional insight into the Company and is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017 filed with the SEC.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1987 under the name Trans Time Medical Products, Inc. In 2002, the Company, then known as Cryomedical Sciences, Inc., and engaged in manufacturing and marketing cryosurgical products, completed a merger with our wholly-owned subsidiary, BioLife Solutions, Inc., which was engaged as a developer and marketer of biopreservation media products for cells and tissues. Following the merger, we changed our name to BioLife Solutions, Inc.
Our proprietary, clinical grade HypoThermosol® FRS and CryoStor® biopreservation media products are marketed to the regenerative medicine, biobanking and drug discovery markets, including hospital-based stem cell transplant centers, pharmaceutical companies, cord blood and adult stem cell banks, hair transplant centers, and suppliers of cells to the drug discovery, toxicology testing and diagnostic markets. All of our biopreservation media products are serum-free and protein-free, fully defined, and are manufactured under current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) using United States Pharmacopia (USP)/Multicompendial or the highest available grade components.
Our patented biopreservation media products are formulated to reduce preservation-induced, delayed-onset cell damage and death. Our platform enabling technology provides our customers significant shelf life extension of biologic source material and final cell products, and also greatly improved post-preservation cell, tissue, and organ viability and function.
The discoveries made by our scientists and consultants relate to how cells, tissues, and organs respond to the stress of hypothermic storage, cryopreservation, and the thawing process. These discoveries enabled the formulation of innovative biopreservation media products that protect biologic material from preservation-related cellular injury, much of which is not apparent immediately after return to normothermic body temperature. Our product formulations have demonstrated notable reduction in apoptotic (programmed) and necrotic (pathologic) cell death mechanisms and are enabling the clinical and commercial development of dozens of innovative regenerative medicine products.
Additionally, as of March 31, 2018, we ownowned a 45%26.7% interest in our joint venture, biologistex CCM, LLC dba SAVSU Technologies (“SAVSU”), a Delaware limited liability company. Our ownership was effectively reduced from 35% to 26.7% during the three months ended March 31, 2018 due to additional cash contributions made by SAVSU Technologies LLC (“STLLC”). SAVSU is in the business of acquiring, developing, maintaining, owning, operating, marketing and selling an integrated platform of a cloud-based information service and precision thermal shipping products. The evo™ line is a line of “smart shippers” designed for the shipment of materials, which must be maintained frozen, at 2-8˚C and/or controlled room temperature temperatures and where near real time monitoring of temperature, location, and payload status information is necessary. A sophisticated electronics package embedded in the evo provides streaming data to the biologistexSAVSU web-based application; where real time shipment status, history, and reports can be generated. Designed for small volume shipments; it fills a critical need in chain-of-custody scenarios for temperature sensitive shipments of cells, tissues, and other cell based products. On December 31, 2016, we restructured our biologistex CCM, LLC joint venture (“biologistex” prior to December 31, 2016 or “SAVSU” December 31, 2016 and thereafter) with Savsu Technologies, LLC (“STLLC”), whereby we contributed certain assets, including our outstanding loan owed by biologistex, and STLLC contributed certain assets, including all cold chain management intellectual property, into SAVSU. Prior to the restructuring, we owned a 52% ownership interest in biologistex. As a result for consideration given by both parties, we own a 45% interest in SAVSU, which is subsequently reduced to 40% on December 31, 2017 and then to 25% on December 31, 2018.
Highlights for the SecondFirst Quarter of 20172018
● | Biopreservation media products revenue was |
● | Gross margin in the |
● | For the three |
● | For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net income was $3,000. This compared to a | |
● | Gained | |
● | Announced that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued a notice of allowance of a patent application to our joint venture, SAVSU, titled "Biologic Stability, Delivery Logistics and Administration of Time and/or Temperature Sensitive Biologic Based Materials". |
● | Announced our joint venture SAVSU will supply SAVSU smart precision shipping containers throughout the World Courier network. SAVSU designs and manufactures innovative high-performance cloud-connected passive storage and transport containers optimized for the cell and gene therapy supply chain. |
● | Executed an OEM agreement to supply CryoStor cell freeze media and HypoThermosol cell storage and shipping media under private label to MilliporeSigma, the life science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. |
● | Cell freeze media highlighted in Mayo Clinic/MD Anderson Journal article on Preservation of Patient-Derived Xenografts for Cancer Research. In multiple comparisons of preservation efficacy of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors, CryoStor was superior to a traditional DMSO-containing home-brew freeze media cocktail. |
● | Our joint venture SAVSU was awarded a second patent for next generation cold chain technologies designed for cell and gene therapies. |
Results of Operations
Our revenue, results of operations and cash balances are likely to fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter. These fluctuations are due to a number of factors, specifically the progress of our customers’ clinical trials, where the pace of enrollment affects customer orders for our products. The majority of our net sales come from a relatively small number of customers and a limited number of market sectors. Each of these sectors is subject to macroeconomic conditions as well as trends and conditions that are sector specific. Any weakness in the market sectors in which our customers are concentrated could affect our business and results of operations.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2017March 31, 2018 and 20162017
Percentage comparisons have been omitted within the following table where they are not considered meaningful.
Revenue and Gross Margin
Three Month Period Ended | Three Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | % Change | 2018 | 2017 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 2,557,765 | $ | 1,989,988 | 29 | % | $ | 3,814,882 | $ | 2,366,201 | 61 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 956,839 | 872,835 | 10 | % | 1,363,829 | 928,402 | 47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,600,926 | $ | 1,117,153 | 43 | % | $ | 2,451,053 | $ | 1,437,799 | 70 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross margin % | 63 | % | 56 | % | 64 | % | 61 | % |
Six Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | % Change | ||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 4,923,966 | $ | 3,842,005 | 28 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales | 1,885,241 | 1,643,840 | 15 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 3,038,725 | $ | 2,198,165 | 38 | % | ||||||
Gross margin % | 62 | % | 57 | % |
Biopreservation Media Product Sales. Our core products are sold through both direct and indirect channels to customers in the regenerative medicine, biobanking and drug discovery markets. Sales of our core proprietary products in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017March 31, 2018 increased 29% and 28%, respectively,61% compared to the same periodsperiod in 2016,2017, due primarily to an increase in volume and selling price per liter sold due to increased orders from the regenerative medicine segment. Revenue growth for the secondfirst quarter was driven by a 31%100% year over year increase from customers in the regenerative medicine segment.segment due to increased demand from late stage cell therapy customers as well as a 37% increase in sales to our distributors. We expect to see continued growth in adoption and use of our proprietary biopreservation media products.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists of raw materials, labor and overhead expenses. Cost of sales in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017March 31, 2018 increased compared to the same periodsperiod in 20162017 due to increased sales of our proprietarybiopreservation media products and write-off of raw materials partially offset by lower overhead costs per liter sold in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.March 31, 2018.
Gross Margin. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 63% and 62%64% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018 compared to 56% and 57%61% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. The increase in margin is due to higher average selling price per liter sold.
Revenue Concentration.In the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we did not derive 10% or morederived approximately 30% of our product revenue from any one customer.two customers. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, we derived approximately 12% and 12%, respectively,21% of our product revenue from one customer.two customers. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.March 31, 2018 or 2017.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses for the three and six month periods ended June 30,March 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 were:
Three Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | % Change | ||||||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Research and development | $ | 318,607 | $ | 599,031 | (47 | )% | ||||||
Sales and marketing | 546,455 | 849,193 | (36 | )% | ||||||||
General and administrative | 1,077,067 | 1,262,818 | (15 | )% | ||||||||
Operating Expenses | $ | 1,942,129 | $ | 2,711,042 | (28 | )% | ||||||
% of revenue | 76 | % | 136 | % |
Six Month Period Ended | Three Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | % Change | 2018 | 2017 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | $ | 605,358 | $ | 1,103,270 | (45 | )% | $ | 346,454 | $ | 286,751 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1,058,399 | 1,583,106 | (33 | )% | 611,502 | 511,944 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 2,180,210 | 2,598,110 | (16 | )% | 1,353,377 | 1,103,143 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | $ | 3,843,967 | $ | 5,284,486 | (27 | )% | $ | 2,311,333 | $ | 1,901,838 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||
% of revenue | 78 | % | 138 | % | 61 | % | 80 | % |
Research and Development.Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, consulting and other outside services, laboratory supplies, and other costs. We expense all research and development costs as incurred, with the exception of the costs associated with the development of customized internal-use software systems that were capitalized in 2016.incurred. Research and development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreasedMarch 31, 2018 increased compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, due primarily to the restructuring of our biologistex joint venture ($301,094 and $498,204, respectively) which was partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation related to new grants of performance based stock options and restricted stock.increased payroll expenses.
Sales and Marketing.Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, consulting, trade shows and advertising. Sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreasedMarch 31, 2018 increased compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, due primarily to the restructuring of our biologistex joint venture ($377,239 and $691,021, respectively) which waspayroll expenses partially offset by an increase inlower tradeshow and travel expenses and stock-based compensation related to new grants of performance based stock options and restricted stock.expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related expenses, non-cash stock-based compensation for administrative personnel and members of the board of directors, professional fees, such as accounting and legal, and corporate insurance. General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreasedMarch 31, 2018 increased compared to the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2017, due primarily to severance fees paid out to terminated executivesan increase in the first quarter of 2016, a decrease inpayroll expenses, taxes, investor relations consulting, stock compensation expense and conferences, deconsolidationinformation technology expenses.
Other Income (Expenses)(Expense)
Interest Expense.expense.The interest expense in the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2018 is due to equipment financing. Interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2017 is due to the note payable related to the credit facility financing arrangement entered into in May 2016.
Amortization of debt discount.The amortization of short-term debt discount in the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 is due to the amortization of the allocated value of the detachable warrants associated with the credit facility financing on arrangement entered into in May 2017 which was fully amortized May 31, 2017.2016.
Loss on equity method investment. The non-cash loss associated with our proportionate share of the net loss incurred byin our investment in SAVSU for the period based on our 26.7% ownership as of March 31, 2018 and our 45% ownership in our investment in SAVSU. Asas of DecemberMarch 31, 2016 we have no obligation to provide any future funding to SAVSU.
Write off of deferred financing costs.The write off of deferred financing costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 is due to the write off of deferred capital costs related to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on January 8, 2016.2017.
Interest income. The reductionincrease in interest income in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017March 31, 2018 compared to the same periodsperiod in 20162017 is due to the lower average short-term investments balanceincreased cash balances in 20172018 compared to 2016.2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we had $2.3$7.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $1.4$6.7 million at December 31, 2016.2017. During the three month period ended March 31, 2018, 12,000 warrants were exercised with a weighted average exercise price of $4.75, yielding $57,000 in proceeds to the Company in which the stock was issued April 3, 2018. Subsequent to quarter end through May 8, 2018, an additional 920,116 warrants were exercised with a weighted average exercise price of $4.75, yielding $4.4 million in proceeds to the Company. Based on our current expectations with respect to our revenue and operating expenses, we expect that our current level of cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. If our revenues do not grow as expected and/or we are not able to manage our expenses sufficiently, including making dividend payments pursuant to the terms of the preferred stock issued to WAVI, we may need to obtain additional equity or debt financing. We may also seek equity or debt financing opportunistically if we believe that market conditions are conducive to obtaining such financing. We currently have an S-3 registration statement filed with the SEC which may be utilized to obtain additional financing.
We continue to monitor and evaluate opportunities to strengthen our balance sheet and competitive position over the long term. These actions may include acquisitions or other strategic transactions that we believe would generate significant advantages and substantially strengthen our business. The consideration we pay in such transactions may include, among other things, shares of our common stock, other equity or debt securities of our Company or cash. We may elect to seek debt or equity financing in anticipation of, or in connection with, such transactions or to fund or invest in any operations acquired thereby.
Net Cash Provided by/Used In Operating Activities
During the sixthree months ended June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, net cash provided by operating activities was $0.4 million compared to net cash used in operating activities was $0.3 million compared to $2.8of $0.2 million for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016. Cash usedMarch 31, 2017. The increase in cash from operating activities decreased primarily due towas the restructuringresult of the biologistex joint ventureincreased sales and increased revenue compared to 2016 which reduced the net loss in the current period compared to 2016.gross margins.
Net Cash Used In/Provided byIn Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities totaled $0.1 million$41,000 during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018 compared to net cash provided by$37,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Both period investing activities of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in cash used by investing activities was the result of cash provided in 2016 from the sales of short term investments, net of purchases of internal use software and equipment during the six months. The cash used in the six months ended June 30, 2017 waswere the result of purchases of property and equipment.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 million andtotaled $18,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $1.1 million induring the sixthree months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily the result of proceeds received from our credit facility, warrant exercises and employee stock option exercises.March 31, 2017. Net cash provided by financing activities in the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2018 was the result of proceeds received from employee stock option exercises and a warrant exercise partially offset by a preferred stock dividend payment. Net cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2017 was the result of proceeds received from our credit facility and employee stock option exercises net of cash payments related to the filing of the Registration Statement on Form S-3.exercises.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate estimates, including, but not limited to those related to accounts receivable allowances, determination of fair value of share-based compensation, contingencies, income taxes, useful lives and impairment of intangible assets and internal use software, and expense accruals. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other factors that we believesbelieve are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed significantly from those policies and estimates disclosed under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2017, filed with the SEC.
Contractual Obligations
We previously disclosed certain contractual obligations and contingencies and commitments relevant to us within the financial statements and Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2017.9, 2018. There have been no significant changes to these obligations in the sixthree months ended June 30, 2017.March 31, 2018. For more information regarding our current contingencies and commitments, see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included above.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not applicable.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as required by the rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2017March 31, 2018 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Control. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected.
None
See accompanying Index to Exhibits included after the signature page of this report for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC. | |
Dated: | /s/ Roderick de Greef |
Roderick de Greef | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial and accounting officer) |
BioLife Solutions, Inc.BIOLIFE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Exhibit No. | |||
| Description | ||
31.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | ||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | ||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | ||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | ||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | ||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
18