accounted for under the equity method. Accordingly, our share of the earnings or losses of our unconsolidated joint ventures, The Berkley and 250 North 10^th, are included in our consolidated statements of operations and ~~other public information.~~

~~Principles of Consolidation -~~ The condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our subsidiaries which are wholly-owned or controlled by us. Entities which we do not control through our voting interest and entities which are variable interest entities, but where we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method. Accordingly, our share of the earnings (losses) of these unconsolidated joint ventures is included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.comprehensive (loss) income (see Note 12 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures for further information). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

We are required to consolidate a variable interest entity (the “VIE”) in which we are considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the ~~entity's~~entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, 250 North 10^th was determined to be a VIE. Due to our lack of control and no equity at risk, we ~~had no VIEs.~~

determined that we are not the primary beneficiary and we account for this investment under the equity method.

We assess the accounting treatment for joint venture ~~investments. This assessment~~investments, which includes a review of the joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine which party has what rights and whether those rights are protective or participating. For potential VIEs, we review such agreements in order to determine which party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the ~~entity's~~entity’s economic performance. In situations where we and our partner approve, among other things, the annual budget, receive a detailed monthly reporting package, meet on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture, review and approve the joint venture's tax return before filing, and approve all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property,equally share authority, we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power of the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the joint venture. Our joint venture agreements may contain certain protective rights such as requiring partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan.

~~Investment~~Investments in Unconsolidated Joint ~~Venture~~Ventures -We account for our ~~investment~~investments in ~~our~~ unconsolidated joint ~~venture~~ventures, namely, The Berkley and 250 North 10^th, under the equity method of accounting (see Note 12 - ~~Investment~~Investments in ~~Our~~ Unconsolidated Joint ~~Venture)~~Ventures for further information). We also assess our ~~investment~~investments in our unconsolidated joint ~~venture~~ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of ~~the~~an investment is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate ~~our~~each equity investment for impairment based on ~~the~~each joint ventures' projected cash flows. We do not believe that the value of our equity ~~investment~~investments was impaired at either September 30, ~~2017~~2021 or December 31, ~~2016.~~2020.

c. Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

d. Reportable Segments - We operate in 1 reportable segment, commercial real estate.

e. Concentrations of Credit Risk - Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. We hold substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in banks. Such cash balances at times exceed federally insured limits.

f. Real Estate - Real estate assets are stated at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. All costs related to the improvement or replacement of real estate properties are capitalized. Additions, renovations and improvements that enhance and/or extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs and improvements that do not materially prolong the useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as described in the table below:

~~Use of Estimates~~ - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Reportable Segments~~ ~~- We operate in one reportable segment, commercial real estate.~~

~~Concentrations of Credit Risk~~ - Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. We hold substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in banks. Such cash balances at times exceed federally-insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.

~~Real Estate~~ - Real estate assets are stated at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. All costs related to the improvement or replacement of real estate properties are capitalized. Additions, renovations and improvements that enhance and/or extend the useful life of a property are also capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance, repairs and improvements that do not materially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives described in the table below:

~~Category~~		~~Terms~~
Category		Terms
Buildings and improvements		10 - 39 years
Tenant improvements		Shorter of remaining term of the lease or useful life
Furniture and fixtures		5 - 8 years

Real Estate Under Development - We capitalize certain costs related to the development and redevelopment of real estate including initial project acquisition costs, pre-construction costs and construction costs for each specific property. Additionally, we capitalize operating costs, interest, real estate taxes, insurance and compensation and related costs of personnel directly involved with the specific project related to real estate under development. Capitalization of these costs begin when the activities and related expenditures commence, and ~~cease~~

Table of Contents

ceases when the property is held available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from the completion of major construction activity at which time the project is placed in service and depreciation commences. Revenue earned under short-term license agreements at properties under development is offset against these capitalized costs.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets - We periodically review long-lived assets for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. We consider relevant cash flow, management’s strategic plans and significant decreases, if any, in the market value of the asset and other available information in assessing whether the carrying value of the assets can be recovered. When such events occur, we compare the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted expected future cash flows, excluding interest charges, from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If this comparison indicates an impairment, the carrying amount would then be compared to the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset. An impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its estimated fair value. No77 Greenwich is a residential condominium development project currently in the development stage and forecasting the expected future cash flows requires management to make significant assumptions and estimates in relation to the remaining costs to complete the project, potential delays or disruptions in construction due to COVID-19 restrictions, and potential sales proceeds to be received upon sale of residential condominium units in light of market disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We also identified the existence of an impairment evaluation triggering event in relation to our 237 11^th Street property as a result of property damage caused by certain construction defects in place prior to acquisition. Significant judgments and estimates are required by management in determining the asset’s estimated future cash flows, including future revenue and operating expense growth rates, holding period, estimated terminal value, estimated costs to sell, and other market-based assumptions. We considered all the aforementioned indicators of impairment for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. NaN provision for impairment was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 or ~~September 30, 2016.~~2020, respectively.

~~Trademarks and Customer Lists~~ ~~- Trademarks and customer lists are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. Amortization is determined using the straight-line method over useful lives of 10 years.~~

Fair Value Measurements - We determine fair value in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ~~820-10-05~~820, “Fair Value Measurement,” for financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity.

Assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, which are defined by ASC 820-10-35, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to the fair valuation of these assets and liabilities. Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment and we evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 - Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.

j. Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents include securities with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Table of Contents

k. Restricted Cash - Restricted cash represents amounts required to be restricted under our loan agreements, letters of credit (see Note 5 - Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit for further information), deposits on condominium sales at 77 Greenwich and tenant related security deposits.

~~Cash and Cash Equivalents~~ ~~- Cash and cash equivalents include securities with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.~~

~~Restricted Cash -~~ Restricted cash represents amounts required to be restricted under our loan agreements and secured line of credit (see Note 5 - Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit), tenant related security deposits and deposits on property acquisitions.

Revenue Recognition - Leases with tenants are accounted for as operating leases. Minimum rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective ~~leases,~~lease, beginning when the tenant takes possession of the space. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases are included in deferred rents receivable. In addition, retail leases typically provide for the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses. ~~These~~As lessor, when reporting revenue, we have elected to combine the lease and non-lease components of our operating lease agreements and account for the components as a single lease component in accordance with ASC Topic 842. Lease revenues and reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses are presented in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income as “rental revenues.” Also, these reimbursements of expenses are recognized aswithin revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. We ~~make estimates of~~assess the collectability of our accounts receivable related to tenant revenues. ~~An allowance for doubtful accounts has been~~With the adoption of ASC Topic 842, we applied the guidance under ASC 842 in assessing our lease payments: if collection of rents under specific operating leases is not probable, then we recognize the lesser of that lease’s rental income on a straight-line basis or cash received, plus variable rents as earned. Once this assessment is completed, we apply a general reserve, as provided ~~against certain tenant accounts receivable that are estimated~~under ASC 450-20, if applicable. Also, we have eleted the ‘package or practical expedients’ approach which allows us not to ~~be uncollectible. Once~~reassess our previous conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. Revenue on sale of residential condominiums reflects the ~~amount~~gross sales price and is ~~ultimately deemed to be uncollectible, it is written off.~~recognized upon the closing of a sale with the buyer.

Revenues and related profits from sales of residential condominium units are recognized at the time of the closing of a sale, when title to and possession of the units are transferred to the buyer. The Company’s performance obligation, to deliver the agreed-upon condominium, is generally satisfied in less than one year from the original contract date. Cash proceeds from unit closings held in escrow for the Company’s benefit are included in restricted cash in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Customer cash deposits on residential condominiums that are in contract are recorded as restricted cash and the related liability is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.Our cost of revenue consists of allocated expenses related to the initial acquisition, demolition, construction and development of the condominium complex, including associated building costs, development fees, salaries, benefits, bonuses and share-based compensation expense, including other directly associated overhead costs, as well as qualifying interest costs and financing costs.

Stock-Based Compensation – We have granted stock-based compensation, which is described below in Note 11 – Stock-Based Compensation. We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC ~~718-30-30,~~718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee ~~services.~~services and ASU No. 2018-07, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which provides additional guidance related to share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods or services from nonemployees. Under the provisions of ASC 718-10-35, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award on that date, and is expensed at the grant date (for the portion that vests immediately) or ratably over the ~~respective~~related vesting periods.

Income Taxes - We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method as required by the provisions of ASC ~~740-10-30,~~740, “Income ~~Taxes”.~~Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We provide a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which we do not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

ASC 740-10-65 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC 740-10-65, we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740-10-65 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and ~~requires~~

Table of Contents

increased other disclosures. As of ~~both~~ September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2020, we had determined that no0 liabilities are required in connection with unrecognized tax positions. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, our tax returns for the ~~prior three~~ years ended December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2020 are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service.

Our state returns are open to examination for the years December 31, 2016 or 2017 through December 31, 2020, depending on the jurisdiction.

We are subject to certain federal, state and local income and franchise taxes.

~~Earnings (loss) Per Share~~ - We present both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower per share amount. Shares issuable under restricted stock units that have vested but not yet settled were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the awards would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.

~~Deferred Finance Costs~~ – Deferred finance costs represent commitment fees, legal, title and other third party costs associated with obtaining commitments for mortgage financing which result in a closing of such financing. These costs are being offset against loans payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for mortgage financings and are included in other assets for our secured line of credit. These costs are amortized over the terms of the related financing arrangements. Unamortized deferred finance costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions which do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.

~~Deferred Lease Costs~~ ~~– Deferred lease costs consist of fees and direct costs incurred to initiate and renew operating leases and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term.~~

o. Earnings (loss) Per Share - We present both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower per share amount. Shares issuable comprising 290,074 restricted stock units that have vested but not yet settled and 7,179,000 warrants exercisable at $4.50 per share were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share because the awards would have been antidilutive for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and the three months ended September 30, 2020.

~~Underwriting Commissions and Costs~~ ~~– Underwriting commissions and costs incurred in connection with our stock offerings are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital.~~

~~Reclassifications -~~ ~~Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.~~

p. Deferred Finance Costs – Capitalized and deferred finance costs represent commitment fees, legal, title and other third party costs associated with obtaining commitments for mortgage financings which result in a closing of such financing. These costs are being offset against loans payable and secured line of credit in the consolidated balance sheets for mortgage financings and had a balance of $2.1 million and $2.6 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Costs for our corporate credit facility are being offset against corporate credit facility, net in the consolidated balance sheets and had a balance of $3.2 million and $3.9 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Deferred finance costs are amortized over the terms of the related financing arrangements. Unamortized deferred finance costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions which do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.

q. Deferred Lease Costs – Deferred lease costs consist of fees and direct costs incurred to initiate and renew retail operating leases and are amortized to depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the related non-cancelable lease term. Lease costs incurred under our residential leases are expensed as incurred.

~~Recent~~ r. Underwriting Commissions and Costs – Underwriting commissions and costs incurred in connection with our stock offerings are reflected as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital in stockholders’ equity.

Any references to square footage, property count or occupancy percentages, and any amounts derived from these values in these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, are outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm’s review.

Accounting ~~Pronouncements~~Standards Updates

Recently Adopted Accounting and Reporting Guidance

In ~~February 2017,~~December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~(“FASB”~~(the “FASB”) issued ~~Accounting~~Account Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~No. 2017-05, Other Income-Gains and Losses from~~2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Simplifying the ~~De-recognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20) to add~~Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this ASU provide guidance for ~~partial sales of nonfinancial assets, including partial sales of real estate. Historically, U.S. GAAP contained several different~~interim period and intra period tax accounting; provide tax accounting ~~models~~guidance for foreign subsidiaries; require that an entity recognize a franchise (or similar) tax that is partially based on income as an income-based tax and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based tax; as well as other changes to ~~evaluate whether the transfer of certain assets qualified for sale treatment.~~tax accounting. This ASU ~~2017-05 reduces the number of potential accounting models that might apply and clarifies which model does apply in various circumstances. ASU 2017-05~~ is effective for ~~annual reporting periods~~fiscal years beginning after December ~~16, 2017, including interim~~15, 2020. The Company usually does not have significant income taxes. Accordingly, the implementation of this guidance did not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01 Investments—Equity securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)—Clarifying the Interactions Between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815. The amendments in this ASU affect all entities that apply the guidance in Topics 321, 323, and 815 and (i) elect to apply the measurement alternative or (ii) enter into a forward contract or purchase an option to purchase securities that, upon settlement of the forward contract or exercise of the purchased option, would be accounted

Table of Contents

for under the equity method of accounting. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Currently, we do not apply the measurement alternative and we do not have any such forward contracts or purchase options. As a result, the implementation of this guidance did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) which modifies ASC 848, which was intended to provide relief related to “contracts and transactions that reference LIBOR or a reference rate that is expected to be discontinued as a result of reference rate reform.” ASU 2021-01 expands the scope of ASC 848 to include all affected derivatives and give reporting ~~period within~~entities the ability to apply certain aspects of the contract modification and hedge accounting expedients to derivative contracts affected by the discounting transition. ASU 2021-01 also adds implementation guidance to clarify which optional expedients in ASC 848 may be applied to derivative instruments that ~~reporting period. The adoption~~do not reference LIBOR or a reference rate that is expected to be discontinued, but that are being modified as a result of the discounting transition. Currently, we do not anticipate the need to modify any existing debt agreements as a result of reference rate reform in the current year. If any modification is executed as a result of reference rate reform, we will elect the optional practical expedient under ASU ~~2017-05~~2020-04 and 2021-01, which allows entities to account for the modification as if the modification was not substantial. As a result, the implementation of this guidance is not expected to have ~~a material impact~~an effect on our ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~statements.~~position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The guidance clarifies the definition of a business and provides guidance to assist with determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. The main provision is that an acquiree is not a business if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of assets. Upon the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, we evaluate each acquisition of real estate or in-substance real estate to determine if the integrated set of assets and activities acquired meet the definition of a business and need to be accounted as a business combination. If either of the following criteria is met, the integrated set of assets and activities acquired would not qualify as a business:

~~Substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in either a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; or~~

The integrated set of assets and activities is lacking, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs (i.e. revenue generated before and after the transaction).

~~An acquired process is considered substantive if:~~

The process includes an organized workforce (or includes an acquired contract that provides access to an organized workforce) that is skilled, knowledgeable, and experienced in performing the process;

~~The process cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay; or~~

~~The process is considered unique or scarce.~~

Generally, we expect that acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related intangible assets) or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 outlines a new model for accounting by lessees, whereby their rights and obligations under substantially all leases, existing and new, would be capitalized and recorded on the balance sheet. For lessors, however, the accounting remains largely unchanged from the current model, with the distinction between operating and financing leases retained, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard discussed above. As lessee, we are party to various office leases with future payment obligations aggregating $3.2 million at September 30, 2017 (see Note 8 - Commitments) for which we expect to record right of use assets upon adoption of ASU 2016-02. The new guidance also requires that internal leasing costs be expensed as incurred, as opposed to capitalized and deferred. We do not capitalize internal leasing costs. ASU 2016-02 will also require extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures and is effective beginning after December 15, 2018, but early adoption is permitted.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 does not apply to our lease revenues, but will apply to reimbursed tenant costs. Additionally, this guidance modifies disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year, until years beginning in 2018, with early adoption permitted but not before 2017. Entities may adopt ASU 2014-09 using either a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients or a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of adoption. Management believes the majority of our revenue falls outside of the scope of this guidance and does not anticipate any significant changes to the timing of our revenue recognition. We intend to implement the standard retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized in retained earnings at the date of application.

Note 3 – Real Estate, Net

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2020, real estate, net, includes the following (in thousands):

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(unaudited) (audited)

Real estate under development 52,249 $ 53,712
Buildings and building improvements 5,817 5,794
Tenant improvements 571 569
Land 2,452 2,452
61,089 62,527
Less: accumulated depreciation 2,327 2,143
$ 58,762 $ 60,384


	September 30,		December 31,
	2021		2020
	(unaudited)		(audited)

Real estate under development	$	242,274	$	213,178
Building and building improvements		41,358		41,358
Tenant improvements		189		189
Furniture and fixtures		759		731
Land and land improvements		27,939		27,939
		312,519		283,395
Less: accumulated depreciation		5,407		4,191
	$	307,112	$	279,204

Real estate under development as of September 30, ~~2017 consists of the~~2021 and December 31, 2020 includes 77 Greenwich and the Paramus, New Jersey ~~properties while real estate under development as of December 31, 2016 consists of the 77 Greenwich, Paramus, New Jersey and Westbury, New York properties. Buildings~~property. Building and building improvements, tenant improvements, furniture and fixtures, and land ~~at both dates consist~~and land improvements includes the 237 11^th property as of ~~the West Palm Beach, Florida property.~~

~~On August 4, 2017, we closed on the sale of our property located in Westbury, New York for a gross sale price of $16.0 million. The sale resulted in a gain of $3.9 million~~September 30, 2021 and ~~generated approximately $15.2 million in net proceeds to us.~~

December 31, 2020.

Depreciation expense amounted to approximately ~~$61,000~~$406,000 and ~~$57,000~~$403,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and ~~September 30, 2016,~~2020, respectively, and ~~$184,000~~$1.2 million and ~~$145,000~~$1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and ~~September 30, 2016, respectively. The increase in depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to the West Palm Beach, Florida property.~~2020, respectively

~~Write-off of costs relating to demolished asset was approximately $3.4 million. This is related to the~~ 77 Greenwich ~~property’s acceleration of depreciation of~~and the ~~building and building improvements and demolition costs at 77 Greenwich due to the completion of demolition of the 57,000 square foot six-story commercial building.~~New York City School Construction Authority

~~On September 8, 2017, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours~~We entered into an agreement ~~pursuant~~with the New York City School Construction Authority (the “SCA”), whereby we agreed to construct a school to be sold to the SCA as part of our condominium development at 77 Greenwich. Pursuant to the agreement, the SCA agreed to pay us $41.5 million for the purchase of their condominium unit and reimburse us for the costs associated with constructing the school, including a construction supervision fee of approximately $5.0 million. Payments for construction are being made by the SCA to the general contractor in installments as construction on their condominium unit progresses. Payments to us for the land and construction supervision fee commenced in January 2018 and continued through October 2019 for the land and will continue through the end of 2021 for the construction supervision fee, with an aggregate of $46.1 million having been paid to us as of September 30, 2021 from the SCA, with approximately $469,000 remaining to be paid. We have also received an aggregate of $50.1 million in reimbursable construction costs from the SCA through September 30, 2021. The payments and reimbursements from the SCA received prior to April 2020 were recorded as deferred real estate deposits on the consolidated balance sheets until sales criteria were satisfied in April

Table of Contents

2020. In April 2020, the SCA closed on the purchase of the school condominium unit with us, at which ~~it acquired~~point title transferred to the SCA, and the SCA is now proceeding to complete the buildout of the interior space, which is planned to become an ~~option~~approximately 476 seat public elementary school. The school is currently anticipated to ~~purchase~~open in September 2022. Upon conveyance, we recognized a ~~newly~~gain on the sale of approximately $20.0 million and an additional gain of $4.2 million related to the recognition of our deferred construction supervision fee. We have also guaranteed certain obligations with respect to the construction of the school.

Unrelated to the SCA, closings on residential condominium units started in September 2021 and residents have started to move in.

237 11^th

In May 2018, we closed on the acquisition of 237 11^th, a recently built 105-unit, ~~12 story~~12-story multi-family apartment building located at 237 ~~11th~~ 11^thStreet, Brooklyn, New York for a purchase price of ~~$81.0~~$81.2 million, excluding transaction costs of approximately $0.7 million. ~~Under~~Due to certain construction defects at 237 11^th that resulted in water penetration into the ~~agreement,~~building and damage to certain apartment units and other property, which defects we believe were concealed and which would have required significant invasive work of a type not usually required or permitted, especially on a newly-built asset, to be detected, we submitted proofs of loss to our insurance carrier for property damage and business interruption (lost revenue) in March 2019. The insurance carrier subsequently disclaimed coverage for the losses and we filed a complaint against the carrier and its administrator, alleging that they breached the insurance policy by denying coverage and requesting a declaration that they are ~~entitled~~obligated to ~~exercise~~cover the ~~option during~~claimed damage. We also filed legal claims against the ~~period commencing on February 1, 2018~~seller, its parent company, and ~~expiring on February 28, 2018. We paid an initial deposit of $8.1 million, which is included in restricted cash~~the general contractor to recover damages arising from the defective construction. In addition, the general contractor impleaded into that litigation several subcontractors who performed work on the ~~condensed consolidated balance sheet, upon entering into~~property. Management expects to recover some portion of the ~~agreement,~~cost incurred to repair the property through the litigations and/or settlement negotiations with the seller, its parent company, the general contractor, the subcontractors, and the insurance carrier, although the amount of damages that may be recoverable in litigation and/or potential settlement negotiations are uncertain at this time, as is the receipt of any such payments, which ~~is nonrefundable if we do not exercise~~has been impacted by the ~~option. The purchase price will be funded through acquisition financing and cash on hand. The acquisition of this property, which is subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close~~COVID-19 pandemic, including the resulting backlog in the ~~first quarter~~court system and slowdown in judicial proceedings. A mediation process commenced at the end of ~~2018.~~February 2021 with the seller, its parent company, the general contractor, and the third-party defendants impleaded by the general contractor to potentially settle the case involving those parties. We incurred significant cash outflows for costs associated with these repairs and remediation, which commenced in September 2019. As of October 31, 2021, the property was approximately 92.4% leased.

As of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, intangible assets, net consisted of the real estate tax abatement at its original valuation of $11.1 million offset by its related accumulated amortization of approximately $2.5 million and $1.9 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Amortization expense amounted to $185,000 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $555,000 for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively

Note 4 – Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2020, prepaid expenses and other assets, net, include the following (in thousands):

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(unaudited) (audited)

Trademarks and customer lists $ 2,090 $ 2,090
Prepaid expenses 1,124 867
Lease commissions 461 433
Other 1,189 417
4,864 3,807
Less: accumulated amortization 2,094 1,658
$ 2,770 $ 2,149


	September 30,		December 31,
	2021		2020
	(unaudited)		(audited)

Prepaid expenses	$	873	$	454
Deferred finance costs		2,184		1,795
Other		1,837		954
		4,894		3,203
Less: accumulated amortization		1,339		500
	$	3,555	$	2,703

Table of Contents

Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit

Corporate Credit Facility

~~Mortgages~~

~~77 Greenwich Loan~~

~~On February 9, 2015, our wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 77 Greenwich and related assets (“TPH Greenwich Borrower”),~~In December 2019, we entered into a ~~loan~~multiple draw credit agreement ~~with Sterling National Bank as lender and administrative agent (the “Agent”), and Israel Discount Bank of New York, as lender (the “Lender”), pursuant to which we borrowed $40.0~~aggregating $70.0 million (the ~~“77 Greenwich Loan”~~“Corporate Credit Facility”)~~. The 77 Greenwich Loan can be increased up to $50.0~~, which provided for an increase by $25.0 million subject to satisfaction of certain ~~conditions.~~conditions and the consent of the lender (the “CCF Lender”). Draws under the Corporate Credit Facility were originally permitted to be made during the 32-month period following the closing date of the Corporate Credit Facility (the “Closing Date”). The ~~77 Greenwich Loan, which was scheduled~~Corporate Credit Facility matures on December 19, 2024, subject to ~~mature~~extensions until December 19, 2025 and June 19, 2026, respectively, under certain circumstances. The Corporate Credit Facility provided for the proceeds of the Corporate Credit Facility to be used for investments in certain multi-family apartment buildings in the greater New York City area and certain non-residential real estate investments approved by the CCF Lender in its reasonable discretion, as well as in connection with certain property recapitalizations and in specified amounts for general corporate purposes and working capital. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events for details on ~~August 8, 2017, was extended to mature on February 8, 2018. We are evaluating our options which include, among others, refinancing~~ the ~~77 Greenwich Loan as part of a construction loan.~~

Corporate Credit Facility amendment.

The ~~77 Greenwich Loan~~Corporate Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $35.75 million at both September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, excluding deferred finance fees of $3.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Accrued interest, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, totaled approximately $3.0 million and $1.5 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

The Corporate Credit Facility bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the ~~greater~~sum of (i) ~~the~~5.25% and (ii) a scheduled interest rate ~~published from time to time by the Wall Street Journal as the U.S. Prime Rate plus 1.25%~~of 4% (the ~~“Contract~~“Cash Pay Interest Rate”) ~~or (ii) 4.50% and requires interest only payments through maturity.~~which increases by 0.125% every six-month period from the Closing Date, subject to increase during the extension periods. The effective interest rate at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was 9.63%. A $2.45 million commitment fee was payable 50% on the ~~77 Greenwich Loan was 5.00%~~initial draw and 50% as amounts under the Corporate Credit Facility are drawn, with any remaining balance due on the last date of ~~December 31, 2016~~the draw period, and ~~5.50% as~~a 1.0% exit fee is payable in respect of Corporate Credit Facility repayments. As of September 30, ~~2017.~~2021, we had paid $1.85 million of the commitment fee. The ~~Contract Rate will~~Corporate Credit Facility may be increased by 1.5% per annum during any period in which TPH Greenwich Borrower does not maintain funds in its deposit accounts with the Agent and the Lender sufficient to make payments then due under the 77 Greenwich Loan documents. TPH Greenwich Borrower can prepay the 77 Greenwich Loanprepaid at any time ~~in whole~~subject to a prepayment premium on the portion of the Corporate Credit Facility being repaid. The Corporate Credit Facility is subject to certain mandatory prepayment provisions, including that, subject to the terms of the mortgage loan documents applicable to the Company’s 77 Greenwich property, 90% or ~~in part, without premium~~100% of the net cash proceeds of residential condominium sales, depending on the circumstances, and 70% of the net cash proceeds of retail condominium sales at the Company’s 77 Greenwich property shall be used to repay the Corporate Credit Facility. Upon final repayment of the Corporate Credit Facility, a multiple on invested capital, or ~~penalty.~~

MOIC, amount equal to 30% of the Corporate Credit Facility amount plus drawn incremental amounts less the sum of all interest payments, commitment fee and exit fee payments and prepayment premiums, if any, shall be due, if such amounts are less than the MOIC amount. The collateral for the ~~77 Greenwich Loan is TPH Greenwich Borrower’s fee interest in 77 Greenwich and the related air rights, which is the subject~~Corporate Credit Facility consists of ~~a mortgage in favor~~(i) 100% of the ~~Agent. TPH Greenwich Borrower also entered into an environmental compliance~~equity interests in our direct subsidiaries, to the extent such a pledge is permitted by the organizational documents of such subsidiary and ~~indemnification undertaking.~~

any financing agreements to which such subsidiary is a party, (ii) our cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash and cash applied toward certain liquidity requirements under existing financing arrangements, and (iii) other non-real estate assets of ours, including intellectual property.

The ~~77 Greenwich Loan agreement requires TPH Greenwich Borrower to~~Corporate Credit Facility provides that we and our subsidiaries must comply with various affirmative and negative covenants including restrictions on debt, liens, business activities, equity repurchases, distributions and dividends, disposition of assets and transactions with ~~affiliates. TPH Greenwich Borrower has established blocked accounts~~affiliates, as well as financial covenants regarding corporate loan to value, net worth and liquidity. Under the Corporate Credit Facility, we are permitted to repurchase up to $2.0 million of our common stock pursuant to board approved programs with Corporate Credit Facility proceeds, $1.5 million with other sources of cash and otherwise subject to the ~~initial lenders, and pledged the funds maintained in such accounts, in the amount of 9%~~consent of the ~~outstanding loans.~~required lenders. The ~~77 Greenwich Loan agreement~~Corporate Credit Facility also provides for certain events of ~~default.~~ default, including cross-defaults to our other loans, and for a guaranty of the Corporate Credit Facility obligations by our loan party subsidiaries.

Pursuant to the terms of the Corporate Credit Facility, so long as the Corporate Credit Facility is outstanding and the CCF Lender is owed or holds greater than 50% of the sum of (x) the aggregate principal amount of the balance outstanding and (y) the aggregate unused commitments, the CCF Lender will have the right to appoint 1 member to our and each of our subsidiary’s board of directors or equivalent governing body (the “Designee”). At the election of the CCF Lender, a board observer may be selected in lieu of a board member. The Designee may also sit on up to 3 committees of the board of directors or equivalent governing body of ours and each subsidiary of the Designee’s choosing from time to time. The Designee will be entitled to receive customary reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with his or her service

Table of Contents

as a member of the board and/or any committee thereof but will not, except in the case of an independent director, receive compensation for such service.

In connection with the December 2020 transaction noted below, the Company entered into an amendment to the Corporate Credit Facility, pursuant to which, among other things, (i) we were permitted to enter into the Mezzanine Loan Agreement (as defined below), the amendment to the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility (as defined below) and related documents, (ii) the commitment made by the CCF Lender under the Corporate Credit Facility was reduced by $7.5 million, and (iii) the MOIC amount was amended to combine the Corporate Credit Facility and the Mezzanine Loan. In addition, the exercise price of the warrants issued in connection with the Corporate Credit Facility was amended from $6.50 per share to $4.50 per share (the “Warrant Agreement Amendment”) (see Note 10 – Stockholders Equity – Warrants for further discussion regarding the warrants). See Note 13 – Subsequent Events for details on the Corporate Credit Facility amendment.

As of September 30, ~~2017, TPH Greenwich Borrower was~~2021, we were in compliance with all ~~77 Greenwich~~covenants of the Corporate Credit Facility, except for a cross-default due to the Senior Loan ~~covenants.~~

WeDefaults and Mezzanine Loan Defaults described below (the “CCF Defaults”). Effective June 30, 2021 and October 1, 2021, the Company entered into a Nonrecourse Carve-Out Guaranty pursuant to which we agreed to guarantee certain items, including losses arising from fraud, intentional harm to 77 Greenwich, or misapplication of loan, insurance or condemnation proceeds, a voluntary bankruptcy filing by TPH Greenwich Borrower, andforbearance agreements (together the ~~payment by TPH Greenwich Borrower of maintenance costs, insurance premiums and real estate taxes.~~

~~West Palm Beach, Florida Loan~~

On May 11, 2016, our subsidiary that owns our West Palm Beach, Florida property commonly known as The Shoppes at Forest Hill (the “TPH Forest Hill Borrower”), entered into a loan agreement with Citizens Bank, National Association, as lender (the “WPB Lender”“CCF Forbearance Agreement”), pursuant to which the ~~WPB~~CCF Lender ~~will provide a loan~~agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies with respect to the ~~TPH Forest Hill Borrower~~CCF Defaults, subject to certain conditions. On October 22, 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, the Company entered into an amendment to the Corporate Credit Facility. As a result of the refinancing transaction, the CCF Defaults no longer exist. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events for further information.

Loans Payable

237 11^thLoans

In May 2018, in connection with the acquisition of 237 11^th, we entered into two-year interest-only financings with an aggregate principal amount of ~~up to $12.6~~$67.8 million, ~~subject to the terms~~comprised of a $52.4 million mortgage loan and ~~conditions as set forth in the~~a $15.4 million mezzanine loan ~~agreement (the “WPB Loan”). TPH Forest Hill Borrower borrowed $9.1 million under the WPB Loan~~bearing interest at ~~closing. The WPB Loan requires interest-only payments and bears interest at~~a blended average rate of 3.72% over the 30-day LIBOR, ~~plus 230~~each with a one-year extension option upon satisfaction of certain conditions. The mezzanine loan was repaid in full in February 2020. In June 2020, the maturity of the mortgage loan was extended to June 2021 and was amended to include a delayed draw facility of $4.25 million. In conjunction with the amendment, a LIBOR floor of 50 basis ~~points.~~points was put in place, the spread was increased by 25 basis points to 2.25% and the exit fee was increased by 50 basis points to 1.0%. In June 2021, we repaid the mortgage loan’s balance of $56.4 million in full and paid an exit fee of $567,000.

In June 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the mortgage loan, we entered into a $50.0 million senior loan (the “237 11^th Senior Loan”) and a $10 million mezzanine loan (the “237 11^th Mezz Loan” and together with the 237 11^th Senior Loan, the “237 11^th Loans”), provided by Natixis, bearing interest at a blended rate of 3.05% per annum. The ~~effective interest rate was 2.75%~~237 11^th Loans have an initial term of two years and have 3 one-year extension options. The first extension option is not subject to satisfaction of any financial tests. $1.5 million of the 237 11^th Senior Loan proceeds have been held back by Natixis to cover debt service and operating expense shortfalls, as well as leasing related costs. There is an outstanding balance of ~~December 31, 2016~~$48.7 million from the 237 11^th Senior Loan and ~~3.54% as of~~$10.0 million from the 237 11^th Mezz Loan at September 30, 2017. The WPB Loan matures on May 11, 2019, subject to extension until May 11, 2021 under certain circumstances. The TPH Forest Hill Borrower can prepay the WPB Loan at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.

2021.

The ~~collateral for the WPB Loan is the TPH Forest Hill Borrower’s fee interest in our West Palm Beach, Florida property. The WPB Loan requires the TPH Forest Hill Borrower~~237 11^th Loans require us to comply with various customary affirmative and negative covenants and ~~provides~~provide for certain events of default, the occurrence of which would permit the ~~WPB Lender~~lender to declare the ~~WPB Loan~~237 11^th Loans due and payable, among other remedies. As of September 30, ~~2017, the TPH Forest Hill Borrower was~~2021, we were in compliance with all ~~WPB Loan covenants.~~covenants of the 237 11^th Loans.

~~On May 11, 2016~~In June 2021, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement as required under the ~~WPB Loan.~~New 237 11^th Loans. The interest rate cap agreement ~~provides~~provided the right to receive cash if the reference interest rate ~~rises~~rose above a contractual rate. We paid a premium of ~~$14,000~~approximately $32,500 for the ~~3.0%~~2.5% interest rate cap ~~for~~on the 30-day LIBOR rate on ~~the~~a notional amount of ~~$9.1~~$60.0 million. The ~~fair value of the~~ interest rate cap ~~as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is recorded~~matures in ~~prepaid expenses and other assets, net in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.~~July 2023. We did not designate this interest rate cap as a hedge and are recognizing the change in estimated fair value in interest expense. ~~During~~

77 Greenwich Construction Facility

In December 2017, we closed on a $189.5 million construction facility for 77 Greenwich (the “77 Greenwich Construction Facility”). We drew down proceeds as costs related to the ~~nine months ended~~construction of the new mixed-use building were incurred. There was an outstanding balance of approximately $159.4 million and $139.0 million on the 77 Greenwich Construction

Table of Contents

Facility at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The 77 Greenwich Construction Facility had a four-year term ending January 2022. The collateral for the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility was the borrower’s fee interest in 77 Greenwich, which was the subject of a mortgage in favor of the 77 Greenwich Lender, as well as related collateral and a pledge of equity in the borrower. The 77 Greenwich Construction Facility bore interest on amounts drawn at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) LIBOR plus 8.25% and (ii) 9.25%. The effective interest rate at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was 9.25%, respectively. The 77 Greenwich Construction Facility provided for certain loan proceeds to be advanced as an interest holdback and to the extent that the cash flow from 77 Greenwich was insufficient to pay the interest payments then due and payable, funds in the interest holdback would be applied by the lender as a disbursement to the borrower to make the monthly interest payments on the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, subject to certain conditions. The 77 Greenwich Construction Facility was prepayable in part in certain circumstances such as in the event of the sale of residential and retail condominium units. In December 2017, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement as required under the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility. The interest rate cap agreement provided the right to receive cash if the reference interest rate rose above a contractual rate. We paid a premium of approximately $393,000 for the 2.5% interest rate cap on the 30-day LIBOR rate on a notional amount of $189.5 million. The interest rate cap matured in December 2020. We did not designate this interest rate cap as a hedge and recognized the change in estimated fair value ~~of the interest rate cap of approximately $3,000~~ in interest expense. In December 2020, we entered into an amendment to the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, pursuant to which, among other things, the sales pace covenants were amended and extended to provide for a reduction in the gross value of condominium sales at 77 Greenwich and to afford more favorable cure rights than previously existed if a required sales threshold was not satisfied. Additionally, the outside date by which we were required to have substantially completed construction of all improvements to 77 Greenwich was extended to November 30, 2021 and the liquidity requirements would be reduced based on construction progress.

In early April 2020, New York State required all non-essential construction projects be shut down due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the construction of 77 Greenwich was temporarily suspended. Construction recommenced mid-April, initially on a modified basis, as certain work was deemed "essential" construction. Since June 2020, a full crew has been on site and operating in accordance with applicable guidelines in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Future delays in construction may result in a delay in our ability to complete the construction project on its original timeline and our ability to sell condominium units. We are currently receiving our temporary certificates of occupancy (“TCOs”) in stages which we anticipate will continue through 2022, with TCOs having been received in March 2021 and June 2021, respectively, which covers floors 11-26 and 28, the lobby, mechanical rooms and portions of the cellar. Floors 27, 29-34 and 36-39 have passed inspection and a TCO for these floors is currently pending with the Department of Buildings.

Upon the granting of our first TCO in March 2021 and 16 units under contract, our offering plan was declared effective. We submitted our request to create separate tax lots to the department of finance and the tax lots were created. We closed on the sale of one residential condominium unit during the third quarter of 2021 and expect additional closings on the residential condominium units for which we have TCOs to continue throughout the fourth quarter of 2021 and beyond. In connection with the December 2020 amendment, we paid down $8.0 million of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and funded certain reserves to the lender, a portion of which was funded by a release of certain cash collateral and the balance of which was funded by the Mezzanine loan (see below).

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, we were in compliance with all covenants, except for (i) an $8.0 million liquidity requirement, (ii) the ~~carrying value~~required deposits to an interest reserve, (iii) the achievement of ~~the interest rate cap was approximately $6,000.~~

~~Secured Line~~certain construction hurdles, (iv) certain sales pace covenant tests and (v) delivery of ~~Credit~~

~~On February 22, 2017, we entered into two secured lines of credit for~~ an ~~aggregate of $12.0 million,~~amendment to our Transit Improvement Agreement with ~~Sterling National Bank as~~ the ~~lender, which were secured by our properties located in Paramus, New Jersey, and Westbury,~~ New York ~~respectively, and had an original maturity date of February 22, 2018. On August 4, 2017,~~City Transit Authority in connection with the ~~sale~~construction of certain improvements to a subway entrance adjacent to 77 Greenwich (collectively, the “Senior Loan Defaults”). Effective June 30, 2021 and October 1, 2021, the Company entered into forbearance agreements (together, the “77 Greenwich Forbearance Agreement”), pursuant to which the 77 Greenwich Lender agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies with respect to the Senior Loan Defaults, subject to certain conditions.

As a result of the ~~Westbury, New York property,~~refinancing transaction in October 2021, the ~~$2.9~~ 77 Greenwich Construction Facility was repaid in full and the Senior Loan Defaults were deemed to have been waived. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events for further information.

Mezzanine Loan

In December 2020, we entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with an affiliate of the CCF Lender (the “Mezzanine Loan Agreement”, and the loan thereunder, the “Mezzanine Loan”).The Mezzanine Loan was originally for the amount of $7.5

Table of Contents

million and has a term of three years with 2 one-year extension options, exercisable under certain circumstances. The collateral for the Mezzanine Loan was the borrower’s equity interest in its direct, wholly-owned subsidiary, which owns 100% of the equity interests in the borrower under the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility. The blended interest rate for the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and the Mezzanine Loan, assuming the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and the Mezzanine Loan are fully drawn, was 9.44% on an annual basis. Interest on the Mezzanine Loan is not payable on a monthly basis but instead is automatically added to the unpaid principal amount on a monthly basis (and therefore accrues interest) and is payable in full on the maturity date of the Mezzanine Loan. Upon final repayment of the Mezzanine Loan, a MOIC shall be due on substantially the same terms as provided for in the Corporate Credit Facility. The Mezzanine Loan may not be prepaid prior to prepayment in full of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, but if the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility is being prepaid in full, the Mezzanine Loan may be prepaid simultaneously therewith. Subject to the prior sentence the Mezzanine Loan may be prepaid in whole or in part, without penalty or premium (other than payment of the MOIC amount, if applicable, as provided above), upon prior written notice to lender under the Mezzanine Loan. In connection with the Mezzanine Loan, the Company entered into a completion guaranty, carry guaranty, equity funding guaranty, recourse guaranty and environmental indemnification undertaking substantially consistent with the Company’s existing guarantees made to the 77 Greenwich Lender in connection with the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility.

As of September 30, 2021, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Mezzanine Loan, except for the occurrence of a liquidity default under the Mezzanine Loan comparable to the liquidity default under the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, other defaults substantially comparable to the Senior Loan Defaults, and a cross-default due to the Senior Loan Defaults (collectively, the “Mezzanine Loan Defaults”). Effective June 30, 2021 and October 1, 2021, the Company entered into forbearance agreements (together, the “Mezzanine Loan Forbearance Agreement”), pursuant to which the lender had agreed to forbear from exercising its rights and remedies with respect to the Mezzanine Loan Defaults, subject to certain conditions. On October 22, 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, the Company entered into an amendment to the Mezzanine Loan which, among other things, increased the amount of the loan thereunder by approximately $22.77 million, of which $0.77 million reflects interest previously accrued under the original Mezzanine Loan. As a result of the refinancing transaction in October 2021, the Mezzanine Loan Defaults were deemed to have been waived. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events for further information.

Secured Line of Credit

Our $12.75 million secured line of credit ~~that was secured by this property, and which was undrawn, matured on that date. The $9.1 million line of credit, which~~ is secured by the Paramus, New Jersey ~~property, was undrawn as of September 30, 2017 and November 8, 2017. This line of credit was increased~~property. In March 2021, we entered into an amendment to ~~$11.0 million in September 2017, and we extended~~extend the maturity date to ~~February 22, 2019.~~March 2022. The secured line of credit, ~~bears~~which prior to the amendment, bore interest ~~for drawn amounts only,~~ at ~~100~~a rate of 200 basis points over ~~Prime, as defined, with a floor~~the 30-day LIBOR, now bears interest at the prime rate, currently 3.25%. The secured line of ~~3.75%, and~~credit is pre-payable at any time without penalty. This secured line of credit had an outstanding balance of $11.95 million and $7.75 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, and an effective interest rate of 3.25% and 2.14% as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

250 North 10^th Note

We own a 10% interest in a joint venture with TF Cornerstone (the “250 North 10^th JV”) formed to acquire and operate 250 North 10^th, a recently built 234-unit apartment building in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York. On January 15, 2020, the 250 North 10^th JV closed on the acquisition of the property through a wholly-owned special purpose entity. Our share of the equity totaling approximately $5.9 million was funded through a loan (the “Partner Loan”) from our joint venture partner. The Partner Loan had a balance of $5.9 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, bears interest at 7.0% and is prepayable any time within its four year term. Our partner has the option of having the Partner Loan repaid in our common stock if the price of our common stock exceeds $6.50 per share at the time of conversion. See Note 12 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.

Principal Maturities

Combined aggregate principal maturities of our loans, secured line of credit and note payable as of September 30, 2021, excluding extension options, were as follows (dollars in thousands):


Year of Maturity	Principal at September 30, 2021		Principal at December 31, 2020
2021	$	—	$	61,153
2022		171,325		139,025
2023		64,579		5,863

Table of Contents

2024		43,250		43,250
2025		—		—
		279,154		249,291
Less: deferred finance costs, net		(5,241)		(6,493)
Total loans, secured line of credit, and note payable, net	$	273,913	$	242,798

Interest

Consolidated interest ~~(income)~~ expense, net includes the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Three Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016


													Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
													September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
													2021		2020		2021		2020
Interest expense	$	644		$	553		$	1,832		$	1,549		$	5,473	$	4,418	$	15,743	$	12,554
Interest capitalized		(562	)		(486	)		(1,602	)		(1,438	)		(4,783)		(3,820)		(13,570)		(11,702)
Interest income		(102	)		(55	)		(141	)		(194	)		—		(53)		(1)		(57)
Interest (income) expense, net	$	(20	)	$	12		$	89		$	(83	)
Interest expense, net													$	690	$	545	$	2,172	$	795

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of our financial instruments are determined based upon applicable accounting guidance. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted ~~process~~prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted ~~process~~prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted ~~process~~prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, ~~prepaid expenses and other assets,~~ accounts payable and accrued expenses, and other liabilities approximated their carrying value because of ~~the~~their short-term ~~nature of these instruments.~~nature. The fair value of ~~each~~the consolidated loans payable, Corporate Credit Facility, the secured line of credit and the ~~loans~~note payable approximated their carrying ~~value~~values as ~~all our loans~~they are variable-rate instruments. The warrant liability is recorded at fair value.

Note 7 – Pension ~~and Profit Sharing Plans~~Plan

~~Pension Plans~~ ~~– Our predecessor,~~ Syms sponsored a defined benefit pension plan for certain eligible employees not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The pension plan was frozen effective December 31, 2006. ~~As of~~At September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2020, we had a recorded ~~liability~~an overfunded pension balance of ~~$2.9 million~~approximately $744,000 and ~~$3.4 million,~~$343,000, respectively, which is included in ~~pension liabilities~~prepaid expenses and other assets, net on the accompanying ~~condensed~~ consolidated balance sheets. If we decided to terminate the plan under a standard termination, we would be required to make additional contributions to the plan so that the assets of the plan are sufficient to satisfy all benefit liabilities.

We currently ~~intend~~plan to continue to maintain the Syms pension plan and make all contributions required under applicable minimum funding ~~rules, although~~rules; however, we may terminate ~~the Syms pension plan.~~it at any time. In the event ~~that~~ we terminate the ~~Syms pension~~ plan, we intend that any such termination ~~shall~~would be a standard termination.

~~Prior~~ Although we have accrued the liability associated with a standard termination, we have not taken any steps to commence such a termination and currently have no intention of terminating the ~~bankruptcy, certain employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements and participated in multiemployer~~ pension plans. Syms ceased to have an obligation to contribute to these plans in 2012, thereby triggering a complete withdrawal from the plans within the meaning of section 4203 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Consequently, we are subject to the payment of a withdrawal liability to the remaining pension fund. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had a recorded liability of $1.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, which is reflected in pension liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. We are required to make quarterly distributions in the amount of $0.2 million until this liability is completely paid to the multiemployer plan.

In accordance with minimum funding requirements and court ordered allowed claims distributions, we paid approximately ~~$4.1~~$5.7 million to the Syms sponsored plan ~~and approximately $5.0 million to the multiemployer plans~~ from September 17, 2012 through September 30, ~~2017. Approximately $0.5 million was~~2021. Historically, we have funded this plan in the third quarter of the calendar year. We funded $400,000 to the Syms sponsored plan during the ~~three and~~ nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 to~~2021 and the ~~Syms sponsored plan and $0.2 million and $0.6 million was funded during the three months and nine months, respectively,~~year ended ~~September 30, 2017 to the multiemployer plan.~~December 31, 2020, respectively.

Table of Contents

Note 8 – Commitments

Leases~~Leases~~ – ~~As of September 30, 2017, our prior corporate office located at 717 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York had a remaining lease obligation of one month for $31,000 payable through October 31, 2017.~~ The ~~rent expense paid for this operating~~ lease for ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $75,000 and $225,000, respectively. Our new~~our corporate office located at 340 Madison Avenue, New York, New York ~~has a~~expires on March 31, 2025. Rent expense paid for this operating lease was approximately $112,000 and $110,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively and $331,000 and $329,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The lease for our sales center for 77 Greenwich located at 17 State Street, New York, New York expired on May 31, 2021. Rent expense paid for this operating lease was approximately $108,000 for the five months ended May 31, 2021. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the rent expense paid for this operating lease was approximately $92,000 and $275,000 respectively. The remaining lease obligation, ~~of $3.2~~excluding any extension options, for our corporate office is approximately $1.6 million ~~payable~~ through ~~March 31,~~ 2025.

Legal Proceedings - We – In the normal course of business, we are a party to routine ~~litigation incidental to our business. Some~~legal proceedings. Based on advice of ~~the actions to which~~counsel and available information, including current status or stage of proceeding, and taking into account accruals where they have been established, management currently believes that any liabilities ultimately resulting from litigation we are currently involved in will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a ~~party are covered by insurance and are being defended~~material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or ~~reimbursed by our insurance carriers.~~liquidity.

Note 9 – Income Taxes

AtAs of September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, we had federal NOLs of approximately ~~$230.3~~$244.3 million. ~~These~~ NOLs generated prior to tax-year 2018 will expire in years through fiscal ~~2034. At~~2037 while NOLs generated in 2018 and forward carry-over indefinitely. The gain resulting from the conveyance of the school condominium to the SCA was fully offset by our available NOL carryforward. Since 2009 through September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, we have utilized approximately $23.8 million of our federal NOLs. As of September 30, 2021, we also had state NOLs of approximately ~~$104.4~~$143.5 million. These state NOLs ~~expire between 2029 and 2034.~~have various expiration dates through 2039, if applicable. We also had ~~the~~ New York State and New York City prior NOL conversion (“PNOLC”) subtraction pools of approximately ~~$31.1~~$24.3 million and ~~$25.5~~$19.3 million, respectively. The conversion to the PNOLC under the New York State and New York City corporate tax reforms does not have any material tax impact.

Based on management’s assessment, we believe it is more likely than not that the entire deferred tax assets will not be realized by future taxable income or tax planning strategy. In recognition of this risk, we have provided a valuation allowance of ~~$96.8 million and $95.3~~$65.8 million as of September 30, ~~2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.~~2021. If our assumptions change and we determine we will be able to realize these NOLs, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets would be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense and an increase in stockholders equity.

On March 27, 2020, the "Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act" was signed into law. The CARES Act, suspended the limitations under the TCJA on the use of NOLs for tax years beginning before January 1, 2021, and allowed losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2021 to be carried back up to five years. The CARES Act also accelerated the ability of corporations to recover AMT credits, permitting a full refund for tax years 2018 and 2019. Additionally, the CARES Act included provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferral of employer side social security payments, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations, increased limitations on qualified charitable contributions, and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. It also appropriated funds for the SBA Paycheck Protection Program loans that are forgivable in certain situations to promote continued employment, as well as Economic Injury Disaster Loans to provide liquidity to small businesses harmed by COVID-19. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020.

Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity

Capital Stock

Our authorized capital stock consists of 120,000,000 shares ~~$0.01 par value per share,~~ consisting of 79,999,997 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, ~~two~~2 (2) shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (which have been redeemed in accordance with their terms and may not be reissued), ~~one~~1 (1) share of special stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 40,000,000 shares

Table of Contents

of a new class of ~~blank check~~blank-check preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2020, there were ~~36,806,915~~39,016,012 shares and ~~30,679,566~~38,345,540 shares of common stock issued, respectively, and ~~31,451,796~~32,618,137 shares and ~~25,663,820~~32,172,107 shares of common stock outstanding, ~~respectively.~~respectively, with the difference being held in treasury stock.

Warrants

~~On February 14, 2017,~~In December 2019, we entered into a Warrant Agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”) with the lender under our Corporate Credit Facility (see Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit – Corporate Credit Facility) (the “Warrant Holder”) pursuant to which we issued ten-year warrants (the “Warrants”) to the Warrant Holder to purchase up to 7,179,000 shares of our common stock. The Warrants are exercisable immediately and had an ~~aggregate~~exercise price of ~~3,585,000~~$6.50 per share (the “Exercise Price”), payable in cash or pursuant to a cashless exercise. The Warrant Agreement provides that we will not issue shares of common stock ~~in a private placement at a purchase price~~upon exercise of ~~$7.50 per share, and received gross proceeds~~the Warrants if either (1) the Warrant Holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially hold 5% or more of ~~$26.9 million. On April 5, 2017, we issued an aggregate of 1,884,564~~the shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise, or (2) such exercise would result in ~~a rights offering at a purchase~~the issuance of more than 19.9% of the shares of issued and outstanding common stock as of the date of the Warrant Agreement, prior to giving effect to the issuance of the Warrants, and such issuance would require shareholder approval under the NYSE American LLC listing requirements. On December 22, 2020, the Company entered into the Warrant Agreement Amendment, whereby the exercise price of ~~$7.50~~the warrants issued in connection with the Corporate Credit Facility was amended to be $4.50 per ~~share and~~share.

The Warrant Agreement provides for certain adjustments to the Exercise Price and/or the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions. Upon a change of control of the Company, the Warrants will be automatically converted into the right to receive the difference between the consideration the Warrant Holder would have received ~~gross proceeds~~if it exercised the Warrants immediately prior to the change of ~~$14.1 million (the “Rights Offering”). We anticipate using the proceeds from the private placement~~control and the aggregate Exercise Price, payable at the election of the Warrant Holder in the consideration payable in the change of control or, if such consideration is other than cash, in cash. The Warrants were valued at approximately $1.4 million and $830,000 at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The $192,000 change in fair value of the Warrants was recorded as an unrealized loss on warrants in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive (loss) income during the nine months ended September 30, 2021.

In connection with the issuance of the Warrants, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with the Warrant Holder, pursuant to which we agreed to register for resale the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Registration Rights ~~Offering~~Agreement”), and a letter agreement with the Warrant Holder (the “Letter Agreement”) pursuant to which we agreed to provide (i) certain information rights, (ii) the right to appoint 1 member of the board of directors of the Company, or in lieu thereof a board observer, and (iii) certain preemptive rights for a period of five years following the ~~development~~exercise of ~~77 Greenwich, potential new real estate acquisitions~~any of the Warrants so long as the Warrant Holder continues to hold shares of common stock. With respect to the board appointment right, the Letter Agreement includes a similar right as the Corporate Credit Facility described in Note 5 – Loans Payable and ~~investment opportunities and for working capital.~~Secured Line of Credit, so long as the Warrant Holder together with its affiliates beneficially holds at least 5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company, assuming the exercise of all outstanding Warrants; provided that the Warrant Holder does not have such appointment right at any time a Designee or observer may be appointed pursuant to the terms of the Corporate Credit Facility.

At-The-Market Equity Offering Program

In ~~December 2016,~~August 2021, we entered into an ~~"at-the-market"~~“at-the-market” equity offering program (the “ATM Program”), to sell up to an aggregate of ~~$12.0~~$10.0 million in shares of our common stock.

During the ~~year~~three and nine months ended ~~December 31, 2016,~~September 30, 2021, we ~~issued 120,299~~sold 149,757 shares of our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of ~~$1.2 million~~$306,000 (excluding approximately ~~$218,000~~$141,000 in professional and brokerage fees) at a weighted average price of $9.76 per share. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we issued no shares and 2,492 shares, respectively, of our common stock and received gross proceeds of $0 and $23,000, respectively, at a weighted average price of $9.32$2.04 per share. As of September 30, ~~2017, $10.8~~2021, approximately $9.7 million of our common stock remained available for issuance under the ATM Program.

Stock Repurchase Program

In December 2019, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we can buy up to $5.0 million of shares of our common stock, which is now subject to the terms of our Corporate Credit Facility. Repurchases under the stock repurchase program may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions at times and on such terms and in such amounts as management deems appropriate, subject to market conditions, regulatory

Table of Contents

requirements and other factors. The program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of common stock, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice.

We did 0t purchase any shares of our common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we purchased 200,803 shares of our common stock at an average price of $1.67 per share, for a total of 250,197 shares of our common stock purchased at an average price of $1.93 per share since the inception of the stock repurchase program. As of September 30, 2021, approximately $4.5 million of shares remained available for purchase under the stock repurchase program, subject to the terms of our Corporate Credit Facility.

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue ~~two~~2 shares of preferred stock ~~(one~~(1 share each of Series A and Series B preferred ~~stock)~~stock, each of which was automatically redeemed in 2016 and may not be reissued), ~~one~~1 share of special stock and 40,000,000 shares of blank-check preferred stock. ~~The share of Series A preferred stock was issued to a trustee acting for the benefit of our creditors. The share of Series B preferred stock was issued to the former Majority Shareholder.~~ The share of special stock was issued and sold to Third Avenue Trust, on behalf of Third Avenue Real Estate Value Fund (“("Third ~~Avenue”~~Avenue"), and enables Third Avenue or its affiliated designee to elect one member of the Board of Directors.

On or about March 8, 2016, a General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction occurred. Under the Plan, a General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction occurs when all of the allowed creditor claims of Syms Corp. and Filene’s Basement, LLC, have been paid in full their distributions provided for under the Plan and any disputed creditor claims have either been disallowed or reserved for by Trinity. On March 14, 2016, we made the final Majority Shareholder payment (as defined in the Plan) to the Majority Shareholder in the amount of approximately $6.9 million. Following the General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction and payment to the former Majority Shareholder, we satisfied our payment and reserve obligations under the Plan. Upon the occurrence of the General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction, the share of Series A preferred stock was automatically redeemed in accordance with its terms and may not be reissued. In addition, upon the payment to the former Majority Shareholder, the share of Series B preferred stock was automatically redeemed in accordance with its terms and may not be reissued.

Note 11 – Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Incentive Plan

We adopted the Trinity Place Holdings Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “SIP”), effective September 9, 2015. Prior to the adoption of the SIP, we granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to our executive officers and employees pursuant to individual agreements. The SIP, which has a ~~ten year~~ten-year term, authorizes (i) stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code, or NQSOs, (ii) stock appreciation rights, (iii) shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock, and (iv) RSUs. The exercise price of stock options will be determined by the compensation committee, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of grant. To date, 0 stock options have been granted under the SIP. The SIP ~~authorizes~~initially authorized the issuance of up to 800,000 shares of ~~our~~ common stock. In June 2019, our stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the SIP, including an increase to the number of shares of common stock available for awards under the SIP by 1,000,000 shares and in June 2021, our stockholders approved an increase to the number of shares of common stock available for awards under the SIP by 1,500,000 shares. Our SIP activity as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was as follows:

Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 Year Ended December
31, 2016
Number of
Shares Weighted
Average Fair
Value at
Grant Date Number of
Shares Weighted
Average
Fair Value at
Grant Date

Balance available, beginning of period 614,500 770,000
Granted to employees (8,600 ) $ 9.13 (105,500 ) $ 5.29
Granted to non-employee directors (18,938 ) $ 6.88 (50,000 ) $ 9.85
Deferred under non-employee director's deferral program (5,643 ) $ 6.88 -
Balance available, end of period 581,319 614,500

We recognized stock-based compensation expense of approximately $42,000 and $127,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, related to non-employee director stock grants.


	Nine Months Ended			Year Ended
	September 30, 2021			December 31, 2020
		Weighted			Weighted
		Average Fair			Average Fair
	Number of	Value at		Number of	Value at
	Shares	Grant Date		Shares	Grant Date
Balance available, beginning of period	548,370		0	1,017,535		0
Additional shares approved by stockholders	1,500,000		0	0		0
Granted to employees	(310,000)	$	1.25	(295,500)	$	3.01
Granted to non-employee directors	(47,374)	$	1.71	(59,660)	$	1.65
Deferred under non-employee director's deferral program	(83,456)	$	1.71	(114,005)	$	1.76
Balance available, end of period	1,607,540		0	548,370		0

Restricted Stock Units

We ~~have typically granted~~grant RSUs to certain ~~employees and~~ executive officers ~~each year~~and employees as part of compensation. These grants generally have vesting dates ranging from immediate vest at grant date to ~~five~~three years, with a distribution of shares at various dates ranging from the time of vesting up to ~~four~~seven years after vesting.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, we granted ~~8,600~~310,000 RSUs to certain employees. These RSUs vest and settle ~~over~~at various times inover a two or three year period, subject to each employee’s continued employment. Approximately ~~$14,000~~$64,000 and ~~$49,000~~$192,000 in ~~RSU~~compensation expense related to these shares was amortized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, of which approximately $3,000 and $15,000 was capitalized in real estate under development for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.

~~Stock-based compensation expense recognized~~ during the three and nine months

Table of Contents

ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021, respectively, of which approximately $20,000 and $61,000 was capitalized into real estate under development.

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income during the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 totaled ~~$277,000~~$106,000 and ~~$831,000,~~$177,000, respectively, which is net of ~~$311,000~~$45,000 and ~~$1.3 million, respectively,~~$91,000 capitalized as part of real estate under ~~development.~~

~~Our RSU activity for~~development, respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and 2020 totaled $317,000 and $531,000, respectively, which is net of $136,000 and $272,000 capitalized as part of real estate under development, respectively.

Our RSU activity was as follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date


						Nine Months Ended			Year Ended
						September 30, 2021			December 31, 2020
							Weighted			Weighted
							Average Fair			Average Fair
						Number of	Value at Grant		Number of	Value at Grant
						Shares	Date		Shares	Date
Non-vested at beginning of period		1,621,235		$	6.38	469,000	$	3.43	453,334	$	5.00
Granted RSUs		8,600		$	9.13	310,000	$	1.25	295,500	$	3.01
Vested		(669,917	)	$	6.45	(207,917)	$	3.59	(279,834)	$	5.46
Non-vested at end of period		959,918		$	6.35	571,083	$	2.19	469,000	$	3.43

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, there was approximately ~~$1.9 million~~$359,000 of total unrecognized compensation ~~cost~~expense related to unvested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized through December ~~2020.~~

2023.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, we issued ~~636,355~~310,000 shares of common stock to employees and executive officers to settle vested RSUs from previous RSU grants. In connection with those transactions, we repurchased ~~339,375~~224,442 shares to provide for the employees’ withholding tax ~~liability.~~liabilities.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2021, we issued 47,374 shares of immediately vested common stock to board members as part of their annual compensation.

Director ~~Deferred Compensation~~Deferral Program

~~We adopted our~~Our Non-Employee Director’s Deferral Program (the “Deferral Program”) ~~on November 2, 2016. Under the Deferral Program,~~, as amended in December 2018, allows our non-employee directors ~~may~~to elect to receive the cash portion of their annual compensation in shares of the Company’s common stock, as well as to defer receipt of the portion of their annual ~~equity compensation. The non-employee directors’ annual equity~~board compensation ~~and any~~that is paid in equity. Any deferred amounts are paid under the ~~SIP.~~SIP (as is non-employee directors’ annual equity compensation that is not deferred). Compensation deferred under the Deferral Program is reflected by the grant of stock units ~~under the SIP~~ equal to the number of shares that would have been received absent a deferral election. The stock units, which are fully vested at grant, generally will be settled under the SIP for an equal number of shares of common stock within 10 days after the participant ceases to be a director. In the event that ~~the Company distributes~~we distribute dividends, each participant shall receive a number of additional stock units (including fractional stock units) equal to the quotient of (i) the aggregate amount of the dividend that the participant would have received had all outstanding stock units been shares of common stock divided by (ii) the closing price of a share of common stock on the date the dividend was issued.

~~During the nine months ended~~As of September 30, ~~2017, 5,643~~2021, a total of 260,615 stock units ~~were~~have been deferred under the Deferral Program.

Note 12 – ~~Investment~~Investments in ~~Our~~ Unconsolidated Joint ~~Venture~~Ventures

~~Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we~~We own a 50% interest in a joint venture (the “Berkley JV”) formed to acquire and operate ~~223 North 8th Street, Brooklyn, New York,~~The Berkley, a ~~newly constructed~~recently built 95-unit multi-family ~~property, known as The Berkley, encompassing approximately 99,000 gross square feet. On~~property. In December 5, 2016, the ~~joint venture~~Berkley JV closed on the acquisition of The Berkley ~~through a wholly-owned special purpose entity~~ for a purchase price of $68.885 million, of which $42.5 million was financed through a 10-year loan (the ~~“Loan”~~“Berkley Loan”) secured by The Berkley, and the balance was paid in cash, ~~(half~~half of which was funded by ~~us).~~us. The non-recourse Berkley Loan ~~bears~~bore interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 216 basis points, iswas interest only for five years, iswas pre-payable after two years with a 1% prepayment premium and ~~has~~had covenants and defaults customary for a Freddie Mac financing. ~~Trinity~~On February 28, 2020, in connection with a refinancing, the Berkley JV repaid the Berkley Loan in full and replaced it with a new 7-year,

Table of Contents

$33.0 million loan (the “New Berkley Loan”) which bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.717% and is interest only during the initial five years. It is pre-payable at any time and can be increased by up to $6.0 million under certain circumstances. We and our joint venture partner are joint and several recourse carve-out guarantors under the New Berkley Loan. In October 2021, we entered into a loan agreement with our joint venture partner (see Note 13 – Subsequent Events).

We own a 10% interest in the 250 North 10^th JV formed to acquire and operate 250 North 10^th, a recently built 234-unit apartment building in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York. On January 15, 2020, the 250 North 10^th JV closed on the acquisition of the property for a purchase price of $137.75 million, of which $82.75 million was financed through a 15-year mortgage loan (the “250 North 10^th Note”) secured by 250 North 10^th and the balance was paid in cash. Our share of the equity totaling approximately $5.9 million was funded through the Partner Loan ~~pursuant~~from our joint venture partner. The Partner Loan bears interest at 7.0% which is payable to ~~Freddie Mac’s standard form~~the extent of ~~guaranty.~~available cash flow and is prepayable any time within its four year term. Our partner has the option of having the Partner Loan repaid in our common stock if the price of our common stock exceeds $6.50 per share at the time of conversion. The ~~effective~~non-recourse 250 North 10^th Note bears interest ~~rate was 3.40%~~ at 3.39% for the duration of the loan term and has covenants, defaults and a non-recourse carve out guaranty executed by us. We earned an acquisition fee at closing and are entitled to ongoing asset management fees and a promote upon the achievement of certain performance hurdles. See Note 5 - Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit – 250 North 10^th Note.

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2021, we have 1 unconsolidated VIE, namely 250 North 10^th. We do not consolidate this entity because we are not the primary beneficiary and ~~2.93% at December 31, 2016.~~the nature of our involvement in the activities of this entity does not give us power over decisions that significantly affect this entity’s economic performance. We account for our investment in this entity under the equity method (see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Basis of Presentation – Principles of Consolidation). As of September 30, 2021, the net carrying amount of our investment in this entity was $5.1 million and our maximum exposure to loss in this entity is limited to the carrying amount of our investment.

~~This joint venture is a voting interest entity.~~ As we do not control ~~this~~these joint ~~venture,~~ventures, we account for itthem under the equity method of accounting. During the nine months ended September 30, 2021, we recognized our share of the fair value liability associated with an interest rate swap

Table of Contents

entered into on February 28, 2020 of approximately $272,000. The combined balance sheets for ~~the~~our unconsolidated joint ~~venture~~ventures at September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and December 31, ~~2016~~2020 are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)

							September 30,		December 31,
							2021		2020
								(unaudited)		(audited)
ASSETS


Real estate, net	$	53,350		$	54,310		$	164,942	$	167,749
Cash and cash equivalents		236			77			1,291		1,344
Restricted cash		327			52			852		766
Tenant and other receivables, net		25			101			314		254
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net		86			169			226		204
Intangible assets, net		13,155			14,362			22,109		24,006
Total assets	$	67,179		$	69,071		$	189,734	$	194,323


LIABILITIES

Mortgage payable, net	$	40,911		$	40,799

Mortgages payable, net							$	113,253	$	114,218
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		547			403			1,859		1,705
Total liabilities		41,458			41,202			115,112		115,923

MEMBERS' EQUITY

Members' equity		27,945			28,485

MEMBERS’ EQUITY

Members’ equity								88,662		92,070
Accumulated deficit		(2,224	)		(616	)		(14,040)		(11,943)
Total members' equity		25,721			27,869

Total liabilities and members' equity	$	67,179		$	69,071

Our investment in unconsolidated joint venture	$	12,860		$	13,939
Accumulated other comprehensive loss								—		(1,727)
Total members’ equity								74,622		78,400

Total liabilities and members’ equity							$	189,734	$	194,323

Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures							$	18,056	$	19,379

Table of Contents

The statements of operations for ~~the~~our unconsolidated joint ~~venture~~ventures for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and 2020 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)

							For the Three Months Ended		For the Three Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended		For the Nine Months Ended
							September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
							2021		2020		2021		2020
							(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues
Rental revenues	$	827		$	2,504		$	3,291	$	3,303	$	9,455	$	9,708
Other income		2			4


Total revenues		829			2,508			3,291		3,303		9,455		9,708


Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses		256			665			1,004		925		3,000		2,430
Real estate taxes		12			35			25		25		75		60
General and administrative		3			8			3		3		8		8
Interest expense, net		375			1,076
Transaction related costs		-			11
Amortization		446			1,338			583		1,475		1,897		4,201
Depreciation		328			983			985		985		2,957		2,848


Total operating expenses		1,420			4,116			2,600		3,413		7,937		9,547


Operating income (loss)								691		(110)		1,518		161

Interest expense, net								(959)		(946)		(2,855)		(2,840)
Interest expense -amortization of deferred finance costs								(71)		(69)		(216)		(1,809)
Interest income (expense) -change in fair market value of interest rate swap								193		—		(544)		—

Net loss	$	(591	)	$	(1,608	)	$	(146)	$	(1,125)	$	(2,097)	$	(4,488)

Our equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint venture	$	(296	)	$	(804	)

Our equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint ventures							$	—	$	(176)	$	(636)	$	(1,302)

Note 13 – Subsequent Events

Partner Loan

On October 7, 2021, we entered into a loan agreement with our partner in The Berkley JV, pursuant to which our partner agreed to lend us up to $10.5 million principal amount, $500,000 of which is available only to be applied to interest payments, secured by our interest in the joint venture entity, maturing in one year, with 2 12-month extension options subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The loan bears interest at a rate of 10% per year, with a portion deferred until maturity. $10.0 million was funded at closing of the loan.

Refinancing Transaction

On October 22, 2021, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours (the “Mortgage Borrower”) entered into a loan agreement with Macquarie PF Inc. (a part of Macquarie Capital, the advisory, capital markets and principal investment arm of Macquarie Group), as lender and administrative agent (the “77 Mortgage Lender”), pursuant to which 77 Mortgage Lender agreed to extend credit to Mortgage Borrower in the amount of up to $166.7 million (the “77 Mortgage Loan”), subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions (the “77 Mortgage Loan Agreement”). Our existing 77 Greenwich Construction Facility was repaid in full at closing and the $33.6 million balance of the proceeds will be used to, among other things, complete construction of 77 Greenwich and fund carry costs while the residential condominiums are being sold. We borrowed $133.1 million on the date of closing of the 77 Mortgage Loan.

Table of Contents

The 77 Mortgage Loan has a two-year term with an option to extend for an additional year under certain circumstances and is secured by the Mortgage Borrower’s fee interest in 77 Greenwich. The 77 Mortgage Loan will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) 7.00% in excess of LIBOR and (ii) 7.25%; provided that, if, on April 22, 2023, the outstanding principal balance of the 77 Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued and unpaid PIK Interest and unpaid Additional Unused Fee (as those terms are defined below) is equal to or greater than $91.0 million, the rate per annum will be equal to the greater of (i) 9.00% in excess of LIBOR and (ii) 9.25%. If cash flow from 77 Greenwich (including proceeds from the sales of residential units) is insufficient to pay interest payments when due, any accrued but unpaid interest will remain unpaid and interest will continue to accrue on such unpaid amounts (“PIK Interest”) until the cumulative PIK Interest and Additional Unused Fee accrues to $4.5 million (the “Threshold Amount”), after which all such amounts in excess of the Threshold Amount shall be paid in cash on a monthly basis until such amounts are less than the Threshold Amount. As advances of the 77 Mortgage Loan are made to Mortgage Borrower and the outstanding principle balance of the 77 Mortgage Loan increases, net proceeds from the sales of condominium units will be paid to 77 Mortgage Lender to reduce the outstanding balance of the 77 Mortgage Loan. A 1% per annum fee (the “Additional Unused Fee”) on a $3.0 million portion (the “Additional Amount”) of the 77 Mortgage Loan, is payable on a monthly basis on the undrawn portion of such Additional Amount. To the extent the 77 Mortgage Loan is not fully funded by October 22, 2022 (April 22, 2023 in the case of amounts with respect to construction work related to the new handicapped accessible subway entrance on Trinity Place), 77 Mortgage Lender may in its discretion force fund the remaining balance other than the Additional Amount into a reserve account held by 77 Mortgage Lender and disbursed in accordance with the terms of the 77 Mortgage Loan Agreement. The 77 Mortgage Loan is prepayable without penalty, subject to 77 Mortgage Lender receiving a minimum total return of $15.26 million, or if an advance has been made of the Additional Amount, the sum of $15.26 million, plus 10% of the Additional Amount that has been disbursed, in each case, inclusive of interest and fees, and must be prepaid in part in certain circumstances such as in the event of the sale of residential and retail condominium units. Mortgage Borrower is required to achieve completion of the construction work and the improvements for the Project on or before July 1, 2022, subject to certain exceptions. The 77 Mortgage Loan Agreement also includes additional customary affirmative and negative covenants for loans of this type, with the first sales pace covenant in April 2023.

In connection with the 77 Mortgage Loan Agreement, we entered into guarantees with the 77 Mortgage Lender pursuant to which we guaranteed the completion and payment of costs and expenses related to the construction (the “Guaranty of Payment and Completion”); the payment of accrued and unpaid interest and other fees, costs, expenses and payments due and payable with respect to the 77 Mortgage Loan or 77 Greenwich (the “Interest and Carry Guaranty”); and the payment when due of all amounts due to 77 Mortgage Lender, as a result of “bad-boy” provisions (the “Recourse Guaranty” and together with the Guaranty of Payment and Completion and the Interest and Carry Guaranty, collectively, the “Mortgage Guarantees”). Mortgage Borrower and the Company also entered into an environmental compliance and indemnification undertaking for the benefit of 77 Mortgage Lender (the “Mortgage Environmental Indemnity”). Additionally, Mortgage Borrower is required to provide a letter of credit (the “Letter of Credit”) in an amount not less than $4.0 million. The Letter of Credit will be reduced to $3.0 million following, among other things, (x) final completion of the Project, subject to certain exceptions, and (y) paydown of the 77 Mortgage Loan to a basis of $625 per square feet of the unsold residential units.

In addition, on October 22, 2021, the Mezzanine Loan Agreement was amended and restated to, among other things, (i) increase the amount of the loan thereunder by approximately $22.77 million, of which $0.77 million reflects interest previously accrued under the original Mezzanine Loan, (ii) reflected the pledge of the equity interests in the Mortgage Borrower to the Mezzanine Lender as additional collateral for the Mezzanine Loan and (iii) conform certain of the covenants to those included in the 77 Mortgage Loan Agreement, as applicable. Additionally, the existing completion guaranty, carry guaranty, recourse guaranty and environmental indemnification executed in connection with the original Mezzanine Loan Agreement were amended to conform to the Mortgage Guarantees and Mortgage Environmental Indemnity made in connection with the 77 Mortgage Loan (and the existing equity funding guaranty was terminated).

In connection with the foregoing, we entered into amendments, dated as of October 22, 2021 and November 10, 2021, to our Corporate Credit Facility pursuant to which, among other things, the parties agreed that no additional funds will be drawn under the Corporate Credit Facility, the minimum liquidity requirement was made consistent with the 77 Mortgage Loan Agreement until May 1, 2023 and the MOIC provisions were revised to provide that (i) the MOIC amount due upon final repayment of the Corporate Credit Facility loan was amended to be consistent with the Mezzanine Loan such that if no event of default exists and is continuing under the Corporate Credit Facility at any time prior to June 22, 2023, the amount due will be combined with the Mezzanine Loan, to the extent not previously paid, if any, and (ii) the amount of the Corporate Credit Facility used to calculate the MOIC was reduced to $35.75 million.

Table of Contents

Private Placement Transaction and Rights Offering

On October 22, 2021, we entered into a private placement agreement with certain existing shareholders (“Investors”), pursuant to which we issued to the Investors an aggregate of 2,539,473 shares of common stock at a price of $1.90 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $4.825 million, which closed on the same day. The private placement agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, conditions and indemnities for agreements of this type. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with the Investors pursuant to which it agreed to file a shelf registration statement registering offers and sales of the private placement shares. The sale of the private placement shares in accordance with the private placement agreement was made in reliance on the exemption from registration of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Our Board of Directors also approved a rights offering of 2,650,000 shares of common stock to existing shareholders of ours on the record date of November 3, 2021, at a price of $1.90 per share. The rights offering commenced on November 5, 2021.

Other than as set forth above, there were no other subsequent events requiring adjustment to, or disclosure in, the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

~~Executive~~ Overview

Trinity Place Holdings Inc. ~~(referred~~, which we refer to in this ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~report as “Trinity,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), is a real estate holding, investment, development and asset management company. Our ~~business is primarily to acquire, invest in, own, manage, develop or redevelop and sell real estate assets and/or real estate related securities. Our~~ largest asset is currently a property located at 77 Greenwich Street in Lower Manhattan (“77 Greenwich”) ~~in Lower Manhattan.~~. 77 Greenwich ~~is a vacant building that was demolished and~~ is under development as a mixed-use project consisting of a 90-unit residential condominium tower, ~~that also includes plans for~~ retail space and a New York City elementary school. We also own a ~~retail strip center~~recently built 105-unit, 12-story multi-family property located at 237 11^th Street in ~~West Palm Beach, Florida, a property formerly occupied by a retail tenant~~Brooklyn, New York (“237 11^th”), acquired in ~~Paramus, New Jersey,~~May 2018, and, through a joint ~~venture,~~ventures, a 50% interest in a ~~newly constructed~~recently built 95-unit multi-family property known as The Berkley, located at 223 North 8^th Street, Brooklyn (“The Berkley”) and a 10% interest in a recently built 234-unit multi-family property located one block from The Berkley at 250 North 10^th Street (“250 North 10^th”) acquired in January 2020, also in Brooklyn, New ~~York (see~~York. In addition we own a property occupied by retail tenants in Paramus, New Jersey. See Properties below for a more detailed description of our ~~properties). On August 4, 2017,~~properties. In addition to our real estate portfolio, we sold our property located in Westbury, New York for a gross sale price of $16.0 million. The sale resulted in a gain of $3.9 million and generated approximately $15.2 million in net proceeds to us. We continue to evaluate new investment opportunities.

Wealso control a variety of intellectual property assets focused on the consumer sector, ~~including~~a legacy of our on-line marketplace at FilenesBasement.com, our rights to the Stanley Blacker® brand, as well as the intellectual property associated with the Running of the Brides® event and An Educated Consumer is Our Best Customer® slogan.predecessor, Syms Corp. (“Syms”). We also had approximately ~~$230.3~~$244.3 million of federal net operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards (“NOLs”) at September 30, ~~2017.~~2021, which can be used to reduce our future taxable income and capital gains.

~~The predecessor~~We continue to ~~Trinity is Syms Corp. (“Syms”). Syms and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11~~evaluate new investment opportunities, with a focus on newly constructed multi-family properties in New York City as well as properties in close proximity to public transportation in the ~~United States Bankruptcy Court for the District~~greater New York metropolitan area. We consider investment opportunities involving other types of ~~Delaware (the “Court”) in 2011. In August 2012, the Court entered an order confirming the Syms Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”). In September 2012, the Plan became effective~~properties and Syms and its subsidiaries consummated their reorganization under Chapter 11 through a series of transactions contemplated by the Plan and emerged from bankruptcy. As part of those transactions, reorganized Syms merged with and into Trinity, with Trinityreal estate related assets, as the surviving corporation and successor issuer pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the Exchange Act. On or about March 8, 2016, a General Unsecured Claim Satisfaction occurred under the Plan. On March 14, 2016, we made the final Majority Shareholder payment (as defined in the Plan) to the former Majority Shareholder in the amount of approximately $6.9 million. Together these satisfied our remaining payment and reserve obligations under the Plan.

~~From the effective date of the Plan in 2012 through the date the General Unsecured Claims Satisfaction occurred, our business plan was historically focused on the monetization~~well as repurchases of our ~~commercial real estate properties, including the development of 77 Greenwich,~~common stock, taking into account our cash position, liquidity requirements, and the payment of approved claims in accordance with the terms of the Plan. During the period from the effective date of the Plan through March 8, 2016, we sold 14 properties and paid approximately $116.8 million for approved claims. These payments reflect cumulative improvements of approximately $11.5 million in respect of all claim payments madeour ability to ~~date as compared with amounts initially estimated. As of September 30, 2017, the amount of remaining multiemployer pension plan claims was $1.9 million (see Note 7 – Pension and Profit Sharing Plans~~raise capital to ~~the condensed consolidated financial statements).~~finance our growth. In addition, we ~~had~~may selectively consider potential acquisition, development and fee-based opportunities, as well as disposition, sale or consolidation opportunities.

Impact of COVID-19

Although we weathered the storm better than many of our competitors, the impact of the recent outbreak and restrictions of COVID-19 on our results and operations has been and will continue to be significant. The extent of the impact going forward will largely depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the severity and duration of the outbreak, in New York City in particular, the success of actions taken to contain or treat COVID-19, actions taken by governmental entities, companies and individuals in response to the pandemic and reactions to such actions, the impact on local and broader economic activity and capital markets from the COVID-19 pandemic and new information that emerges with respect to the foregoing and other ~~pension liabilities~~aspects of ~~$2.9 million~~COVID-19. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will impact the Company’s business, operations and financial results in the future will depend on numerous evolving factors that the Company is not able to predict at this time, including, but not limited to, the impact on sales of residential condominium units at our most significant asset, 77 Greenwich, which has been material, and the impact on the timing for construction of 77 Greenwich; the impact on the timing of the 237 11^th litigation due to backlog in the New York City court system and the slowdown in judicial proceedings, and the receipt of any payments we may receive in connection with the litigation; our ability to obtain maturity extensions, forbearances and/or covenant modifications on acceptable terms; increased operating costs related to cleaning and disinfecting our properties; the effect of the pandemic on the Company’s tenants and their ability to make rental payments; and the effect of the eviction moratorium (in effect from March 2020 through August 31, 2021 and extended through January 15, 2022, subject to further extension) imposed by New York State, the impact of decisions of the NYC Rent Guidelines Board on our ability to raise rents, our ability to raise capital in the form of equity, debt, asset sales or otherwise on acceptable terms or at all and our ability to enter into strategic or other transactions. These developments and events have and will continue to adversely impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price, which has been and is anticipated to continue to be material, although in recent months we have seen indications of a recovery in the New York City real estate market and improvements in the financing markets, including our ability to successfully refinance our 237 11^th mortgage loan in June 2021 and our 77 Greenwich Construction Facility (as defined below) in October 2021. See Note 1 – Business to our consolidated financial statements and Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.

Vacancy rates for multi-family properties across all boroughs of New York City have increased since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the largest increases in Manhattan. The work from home phenomenon resulted in significant number of people moving out of urban areas to suburban areas. This has driven a drop in rental rates and an increase in concessions resulting in lower net effective rents, primarily on new leases. In recent months, with the implementation of

Table of Contents

COVID-19 vaccination programs and companies encouraging employees to return to the office, more potential tenants are moving back into New York City, which already resulted in an increase in face rents and a reduction in concessions. New York State imposed a moratorium on tenant evictions in March 2020 which has been extended several times, and will now be in place until January 15, 2022, unless extended further. Rent collections at our properties have been strong and in line with pre-pandemic collection rates. Notwithstanding these broader market trends, although multi-family property sales transaction volumes decreased in 2020, signs of distress, including discounted sales prices and debt workouts, in the New York City investment market have been almost non-existent over the past year.

Properties

Below is certain information regarding our real estate properties as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2021:


		Building Size
		(estimated		Leased at
		rentable	Number of	September 30,
Property Location	Type of Property	square feet)	Units	2021
Owned Locations

77 Greenwich, New York, New York (1)	Property under development	—	—	N/A

Paramus, New Jersey (2)	Property under development	77,000	—	100.0	%

237 11^th Street, Brooklyn, New York (3)	Multi-family	80,000	105	92.4	%

Total		157,000	105

Joint Ventures

223 North 8^th Street, Brooklyn, New York - 50% (4)	Multi-family	65,000	95	100.0	%

250 North 10^th Street, Brooklyn, New York - 10% (5)	Multi-family	158,000	234	98.7	%

Total		223,000	329

Grand Total		380,000	434

On February 14, 2017, we issued an aggregate of 3,585,000 shares of common stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $7.50 per share, and received gross proceeds of $26.9 million. On April 5, 2017, we issued an aggregate of 1,884,564 shares of common stock in a rights offering at a purchase price of $7.50 per share and received gross proceeds of $14.1 million (the “Rights Offering”). We anticipate using the proceeds from the private placement and the Rights Offering for the development of 77 Greenwich, potential new real estate acquisitions and investment opportunities and for working capital.

On September 8, 2017, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours entered into an agreement pursuant to which it acquired an option to purchase a newly built 105-unit, 12 story apartment building located at 237 11th Street, Brooklyn, New York for a purchase price of $81.0 million. Under the agreement, we are entitled to exercise the option during the period commencing on February 1, 2018 and expiring on February 28, 2018. We paid an initial deposit of $8.1 million upon entering into the agreement, which is nonrefundable if we do not exercise the option. The purchase price will be funded through acquisition financing and cash on hand. The acquisition of this property, which is subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018.

~~Properties~~

~~The table below provides information on the properties we owned at September 30, 2017:~~

Property Location Type of Property Building Size
(estimated
rentable
square feet) Number
of Units Leased at
September
30, 2017 Occupancy
at
September
30, 2017 Occupancy
at
September
30, 2016

Owned Locations

New York, New York (77 Greenwich) (1) Property under development 57,000 - N/A N/A N/A

Paramus, New Jersey (2) Property under development 77,000 - - 100.0 % 5.2 %

West Palm Beach, Florida (3) Retail 112,000 - 68.9 % 68.9 % 67.8 %

Total Owned Square Feet 246,000

Joint Venture

223 North 8th Street, Brooklyn, New York - 50% (4) Multi-family 65,000 95 94.7 % 94.7 % -

Grand Total Square Feet 311,000

(1)

77 Greenwich.The 77 Greenwich property consisted of a vacant six-story commercial building of approximately 57,000 square feet, yielding approximately 173,000 square feet of zoning floor area as-of-right. We also have ownership of approximately 60,000 square feet of development rights from adjacent tax lots, one of which is owned in fee by us and has a 4-story landmark building. We are currently innearing completion of the development stage for the development of an over 300,000 gross square foot mixed-use building that corresponds to the approximate total of 233,000 zoning square ~~feet as described above.~~feet. The plans call for ~~approximately~~the development of 90 luxury residential ~~condominiums and 7,600~~condominium apartments, 7,500 square feet of retail space, ~~on Greenwich Street, as well as~~almost all of which is street level, a 476-seat elementary school serving New York City District ~~2. The school project has obtained city council~~2, including the adaptive reuse of the landmarked Robert and ~~mayoral approval. Environmental remediation~~Anne Dickey House, and ~~demolition was completed in~~construction of a new handicapped accessible subway entrance on Trinity Place. In early April 2020, New York State required all non-essential construction projects be shut down due to the ~~third quarter~~impact of ~~2017, and excavation and foundation work has begun. The~~the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the construction of 77 Greenwich ~~Loan,~~was temporarily suspended. Construction recommenced mid-April, initially on a modified basis, as certain work was deemed “essential” construction. Since June 2020, a full crew has been on site and operating in accordance with applicable guidelines in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. As of September 30, 2021, tile and stone was installed up to the 35^th floor, wood flooring, kitchen cabinets and appliances were installed through the 34^th floor. We have also completed the build-out and furnishing of the model units and moved the sales gallery to the building. The attorney general’s office approved our condominium offering plan in April 2019. Marketing of residential units for sale commenced during the spring 2019 and the Company has commenced entering into sales agreements and closings of sales with purchasers of the residential condominium units. Residents have started to move into their respective units. Although sales activity has recently begun to increase from 2020 levels, through December 31, 2020 sales activity was adversely impacted by the pandemic and the local New York City economy. In December 2017, we closed on a $189.5 million construction facility, which was ~~scheduled to mature on August 8, 2017,~~paid down by $8.0 million in December 2020. This construction facility had an aggregate balance of $159.4 million as of September 30, 2021 and was ~~extended to mature on February 8, 2018. We are evaluating our options with respect to the 77 Greenwich Loan, which include, among others, refinancing the 77 Greenwich Loan~~repaid in full as part of ~~a construction loan.~~the Company’s refinancing transaction in October 2021. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to the consolidated financial statements.

We entered into an agreement with the New York City School Construction Authority (the “SCA”), whereby we agreed to construct a school to be sold to the SCA as part of our condominium development at 77 Greenwich. Pursuant

Table of Contents

to the agreement, the SCA agreed to pay us $41.5 million for the purchase of their condominium unit and reimburse us for the costs associated with constructing the school, including a construction supervision fee of approximately $5.0 million payable to us. Payments for construction are being made by the SCA to the general contractor in installments as construction on their condominium unit progresses. Payments to us for the land and construction supervision fee commenced in January 2018 and continued through October 2019 for the land and will continue through the end of 2021 for the construction supervision fee, with an aggregate of $46.1 million having been paid to us as of September 30, 2021 from the SCA, with approximately $469,000 remaining to be paid. We have also received an aggregate of $50.1 million in reimbursable construction costs from the SCA through September 30, 2021. The SCA closed on the purchase of the school condominium unit with us in April 2020, at which point title transferred to the SCA, and the SCA is now proceeding to complete the buildout of the interior space, which is planned to become an approximately 476 seat public elementary school. The pace of completion of the buildout by the SCA has been impacted by COVID-19 and the school is currently anticipated to open in September 2022. Upon conveyance, we recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $20.0 million and an additional gain of $4.2 million related to the recognition of our deferred construction supervision fee. With the refinancing transaction noted above, the events of default under the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and associated Mezzanine Loan were deemed to have been waived. See Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit for further information.

Prior to the COVID-19 related shutdown of all non-essential construction by New York State in early April 2020, the residential condominium units were scheduled to be completed by the end of 2020. Future delays in construction may result in a delay in our ability to complete the construction project on its anticipated timeline and our ability to sell condominium units. We are currently receiving our temporary certificates of occupancy (“TCOs”) in stages which we anticipate will continue through 2022, with TCOs having been received in March 2021 and June 2021, respectively, which covers floors 11-26 and 28, the lobby, mechanical rooms and portions of the cellar. Floors 27, 29-34 and 36-39 have passed inspections and a TCO for these floors is currently pending with the Department of Buildings.

(2)

Paramus Property. The Paramus property consists of a one-story and partial two-story, 73,000 square foot freestanding building and an outparcel building of approximately 4,000 square feet, for approximately 77,000 total square feet of rentable space. The primary building is comprised of approximately 47,000 square feet of ground floor space, and two separate mezzanine levels of approximately 21,000 and 5,000 square feet. The 73,000 square foot building ~~was occupied pursuant to a short-term license agreement~~is leased to Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RH) (“Restoration Hardware”) ~~from October 15, 2015~~pursuant to ~~February 29, 2016 when the tenant vacated the property. Subsequently, we entered into~~ a ~~new twelve month~~ license agreement ~~with Restoration Hardware~~ that began on June 1, 2016, which is terminable upon ~~one month’s~~three months’ notice, ~~to the other party, which has since been extended~~and currently is scheduled to end on March 31, ~~2018.~~2023. The outparcel building is leased to a long-term tenant whose lease expires on March 31, ~~2018. The tenant has been in the space since 1996.~~2022. The land area of the Paramus property consists of approximately 292,000 square feet, or approximately 6.7 acres. ~~We have entered into an option agreement with Carmax (NYSE:KMX) who will construct a new building after~~During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, we ~~obtain approvals and demolish the existing buildings. The option agreement includes a fully negotiated ground lease agreement. This transaction is subject to town approvals.~~collected 100% of rent due.

We are currently exploring options with respect to the Paramus property, including development or sale, among others.

(3)

~~West Palm Beach Property.~~237 11 ~~The West Palm Beach property consists~~^th Street.In May 2018, we closed on the acquisition of a ~~one-story neighborhood retail strip center that is comprised~~recently built 105-unit, 12-story multi-family apartment building encompassing approximately 93,000 gross square feet (approximately 80,000 rentable square feet) located at 237 11^th Street, Park Slope, Brooklyn, New York for a purchase price of $81.2 million, excluding transaction costs of approximately ~~112,000~~$0.7 million. The property also includes 6,264 square feet of ~~rentable area,~~retail space, all of which ~~includes three outparcel locations with approximately 11,000 combined square feet. The land area~~is leased to Starbucks Inc. (NQGS:SBUX), an oral surgeon and a health and wellness tenant. Located on the border of the ~~West Palm Beach~~Park Slope and Gowanus neighborhoods of Brooklyn, the property ~~consists~~is located one block from the 4th Avenue/9th Street subway station. The 237 11^th property offers an array of ~~approximately 515,000 square feet, or approximately 11.8 acres. Our redevelopment and repositioning of~~modern amenities that surpass what is available in the center was completed in 2016. We will incur additional lease-up costs as the current vacancies are filled. Our two largest tenants are Walmart Marketplace, with 41,662 square feet of space and Tire Kingdom,neighborhood’s “brownstone” housing stock. The property also benefits from a ~~national credit tenant with a 5,400 square feet outparcel.~~15-year Section 421-a real estate tax exemption.

Due to certain construction defects at 237 11^th that resulted in water penetration into the building and damage to certain apartment units and other property, which defects we believe were concealed and which would have required significant invasive work of a type not usually required or permitted, especially on a newly-built asset, to be detected, we submitted proofs of loss to our insurance carrier for property damage and business interruption (lost revenue) in March 2019. The insurance carrier subsequently disclaimed coverage for the losses and we filed a complaint against the carrier and its administrator, alleging that they breached the insurance policy by denying coverage and requesting a declaration that they are obligated to cover the claimed damage. We also filed legal claims against the seller, its parent company, and the general contractor to recover damages arising from the defective construction. In addition, the general contractor impleaded into that litigation several subcontractors who performed work on the property. Management expects to recover some portion of the cost incurred to repair the property through the litigations and/or settlement negotiations with the seller, its parent company, the general contractor, the subcontractors, and the

Table of Contents

insurance carrier, although the amount of damages that may be recoverable in litigation and/or potential settlement negotiations are uncertain at this time, as is the receipt of any such payments, which has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the resulting backlog in the court system and slowdown in judicial proceedings. A mediation process commenced at the end of February 2021 with the seller, its parent company, the general contractor, and the third-party defendants impleaded by the general contractor to potentially settle the case involving those parties. We incurred significant cash outflows for costs associated with these repairs and remediation, which commenced in September 2019. Remediation and restoration work was delayed for two months in 2020 due to the temporary shutdown of non-essential construction projects in New York from April to June, which resulted in a delay in commencement of our leasing up of the property. Future delays would have a similar impact. As of September 30, 2021, remediation work is complete, other than a few specific units. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, we collected 100% of rent due. Since the leasing program began in May 2021, the lease up of the property has been robust. As of October 31, 2021, the property was approximately 92.4% leased.

(4)

223 North 8^th Street.Through a joint venture, ~~with Pacolet Milliken Enterprises, Inc.,~~ we own a 50% interest in the entity formed to acquire and operate The Berkley, a ~~newly constructed~~recently built 95-unit multi-family property encompassing approximately 99,000 gross square feet (65,000 rentable square feet) onat 223 North ~~8th~~8^th Street in North Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York. The Berkley is in close proximity to public transportation and offers a full amenity package. Apartments feature top-of-the-line unit finishes, central air conditioning and heating and most units have private outdoor space. The property ~~has~~benefits from a 25-year ~~421a~~Section 421-a real estate tax ~~abatement.~~exemption. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, The Berkley collected 99.3% and 99.8% of rent due, respectively. As of October 31, 2021, the property was 100% leased.

(5)

250 North 10^th Street.Through a joint venture, we own a 10% interest in the entity formed to acquire and operate 250 North 10^th Street, a recently built 234-unit apartment building in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York. The property is four blocks from the Bedford Avenue L subway station and a short walk from the Metropolitan Avenue G subway station as well as the J, M, and Z trains at Marcy Avenue. It is located one block from The Berkley. Apartments feature top-of-the-line unit finishes including GE stainless steel appliances, caesarstone countertops, in-unit washers and dryers, individually zoned climate controls, floor to ceiling windows and oak hardwood floors. In addition, the property offers a full amenity package including a concierge, a resident’s lounge with roof deck, a fitness center, a café lounge and an expansive terrace, tenant storage, parking, and sweeping views of the neighborhood and Manhattan. The property has approximately eight years remaining on its 15-year Section 421-a real estate tax exemption. Although all apartments are market rate units, they are subject to New York City’s rent stabilization law during the remaining term of the Section 421-a real estate tax exemption. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, 250 North 10^th Street collected approximately 96.4% and 95.1% of rent due, respectively. As of October 31, 2021, the property was 100% leased.

Lease Expirations

~~The following chart shows the tenancy, by year of lease expiration, of our retail properties for all tenants in place as~~As of September 30, ~~2017, excluding the license agreement~~2021, we have one retail lease at our Paramus property with ~~Restoration Hardware~~4,000 square feet of leased space with annualized rent of $140,000 per year that expires in 2022, a retail lease at the ~~Paramus, New Jersey~~ 237 11^thproperty with 2,006 square feet of leased space with annualized rent of $130,000 per year that expires in 2027, a second retail lease at the 237 11^thproperty with 1,074 square feet of leased space with average annualized rent of approximately $93,000 per year that expires in 2036, and a ~~pop-up store~~third retail lease at the ~~West Palm Beach, Florida~~237 11^th property ~~(dollars~~with 2,208 square feet of leased space with annualized rent of approximately $171,000 per year that expires in ~~thousands):~~2032. All our other leases are residential leases which expire within twelve or twenty-four months of the commencement date.

Number of
Tenants Leased Square
Feet by Year of
Expiration Annualized
Rent in Year of
Expiration (A)

2017 (B) 2 2,400 $ 29
2018 1 4,000 140
2019 - - -
2020 8 12,488 245
2021 2 7,063 119
Thereafter 6 55,462 1,121
19 81,413 $ 1,654

~~(A)~~

~~This is calculated by multiplying the rent in the final month of the lease by 12.~~

~~(B)~~

~~Reflects tenants with a month-to-month tenancy.~~

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts in our ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A summary of ~~the~~our significant accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements are included in this report (see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Basis of Presentation to our ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial ~~statements)~~statements for further information). Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements included in this report and require the application of significant judgment by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty. We believe there have been no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our

Table of Contents

critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our ~~2016~~2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the ~~“2016~~“2020 Annual Report”) for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~

2020.

The following discussion and analysis is intended to assist readers in understanding our financial condition and results of operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and ~~September 30, 2016~~2020 and should be read in conjunction with the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our ~~2016~~2020 Annual Report.

These results include revenues and expenses from the Westbury, New York property as of May 8, 2017 when the property was classified as an asset held for sale through its date of sale on August 4, 2017. In prior periods, this property’s revenues and expenses were capitalized as the property was considered as real estate under development.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~

2020

Rental revenues in total increased by ~~$8,000~~approximately $607,000 to ~~$336,000~~$803,000 for three months ended September 30, 2021 from $196,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 from $328,000~~2020. This consisted of an increase in rent revenues of approximately $588,000 to $789,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016. The increase in rental revenues was mainly due to increased tenancy at the West Palm Beach, Florida property as well as revenues~~2021 from ~~the Westbury, New York property, partially offset by a non-cash rent adjustment for a tenant at the West Palm Beach, Florida property. Tenant reimbursements decreased by $37,000 to $171,000~~$201,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 from $208,000~~2020, as well as an increase in tenant reimbursements of approximately $19,000 to $14,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016. The decrease in tenant reimbursements was mainly due to the sale~~2021 from an expense of ~~the Westbury, New York property on August 4, 2017.~~

~~Property operating expenses increased by $34,000 to $178,000~~$5,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 from $144,000 for~~2020. The increase in total revenues and its related components was due to higher occupancy, higher face rents and less rent concessions at 237 11^th during the three months ended September 30, 2016. These amounts consisted of costs incurred for maintenance and repairs, utilities and general operating expenses at our West Palm Beach, Florida property as well as from the Westbury, New York property.

Real estate tax expense increased by $61,000 to $124,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $63,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase related to increased real estate taxes at the West Palm Beach, Florida property as well as from the real estate taxes at Westbury, New York property.

~~General and administrative expenses were essentially flat for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as~~2021 compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2020 due to the increased tenancy from the progress made in remediating the construction related defects.

Other income decreased by approximately $50,000 to $30,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 from $80,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2020 which consisted mainly of the SCA construction supervision fees we recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2021 in accordance with the revenue recognition policies effective after the closing on the sale of the school condominium to the SCA in April 2020.

In connection with the commencement of sales of residential condominium units for the three months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded gross sales proceeds of approximately $1.45 million.

Property operating expenses decreased by approximately $2.0 million to $705,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 from $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease was principally due to expenses associated with 237 11^th, including approximately $2.1 million in lower costs incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2020 to repair the construction related defects partially offset by $61,000 more in leasing commissions incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2020 as more apartment units are being leased as they become fully remediated. Property operating expenses consisted primarily of expenses incurred for utilities, payroll, COVID-19 related supplies and general operating expenses as well as repairs and maintenance and leasing commission at 237 11^th.

Real estate tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2021 of $17,000 remained fairly consistent with the three months ended September 30, 2020 at $19,000.

General and administrative expenses increased by approximately ~~$1.5 million.~~$29,000 to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021 from $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2017, of this amount,~~2021, approximately ~~$277,000~~$106,000 related to stock-based compensation, ~~$479,000~~$670,000 related to payroll and payroll related expenses, ~~$389,000~~$255,000 related to other corporate ~~costs,~~expenses, including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance and ~~$364,000~~$186,000 related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2016, of this amount,~~2020, approximately ~~$446,000~~$177,000 related to stock-based compensation, ~~$392,000~~$687,000 related to payroll and payroll related ~~costs, $321,000~~expenses, $241,000 related to other corporate ~~costs~~expenses, including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance and ~~$370,000~~$83,000 related to legal, accounting and other professional fees.

~~Transaction~~Pension related costs decreased by ~~$40,000~~approximately $7,000 to ~~$9,000~~$158,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$49,000~~$165,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. These costs represent professional fees and other periodic pension costs incurred in connection with the legacy Syms Pension Plan (see Note 7 – Pension Plan to our consolidated financial statements for further information).

In connection with the commencement of sales of residential condominium units for the three months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded cost of sales of approximately $1.4 million, which consists of construction and capitalized operating costs that are allocated to the respective condominium units being sold.

Table of Contents

No transaction related costs were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2021 as compared to $27,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2020. These costs represent professional fees and other costs incurred in connection with ~~formation activities and~~ the underwriting and evaluation of potential acquisitions and investments for ~~deals~~transactions that were not consummated, as well as costs for potential leases at our retail properties that were not consummated.

Depreciation and amortization ~~expense~~ increased by approximately ~~$24,000~~$26,000 to ~~$145,000~~$716,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$121,000~~$690,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2017, approximately $61,000 related to~~2021, depreciation and amortization expense consisted of depreciation for ~~the West Palm Beach, Florida property,~~237 11^th of approximately $409,000 and ~~$84,000 related to~~ the amortization of ~~trademarks~~lease commissions, acquired in-place leases and warrants of approximately $307,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2020, depreciation and amortization expense consisted of depreciation for 237 11^th property of approximately $407,000 and the amortization of lease ~~commissions. Of the $121,000~~commissions, acquired in-place leases and warrants of approximately $283,000. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016, approximately $29,000 related~~2021 compared to ~~depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property and approximately $92,000 related~~September 30, 2020 was primarily due to amortization of ~~trademarks and lease commissions.~~

Write-off of costs for the three months ended September 30, 2017 relating to demolished asset was approximately $3.4 million. This is related to the 77 Greenwich property’s acceleration of depreciation of the building and building improvements and demolition costs at 77 Greenwich due to the completion of demolition of the 57,000 square foot six-story commercial building.

Operating loss increased by approximately $3.5 million to $4.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the changes in revenues and operating expenses as described above.

warrants.

Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint ~~venture~~ventures decreased by approximately $176,000 to $0 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 was approximately $296,000. This amount~~2021 from $176,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2020. Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint ventures represents our 50% share in The Berkley and our 10% share in 250 North 10^th. For the ~~joint venture of the newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property in Brooklyn, New York purchased on December 5, 2016. Our~~three months ended September 30, 2021, our share of the loss is primarily comprised of operating income before depreciation of ~~$279,000~~$451,000 offset by depreciation and amortization of ~~$387,000~~$360,000, interest expense of $188,000 and the income from the change in the fair market value of the interest rate swap of $97,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2020, our share of the loss is primarily comprised of operating income before depreciation of $457,000 offset by depreciation and amortization of $447,000 and interest expense of ~~$188,000.~~$186,000.

~~Interest income, net,~~Unrealized gain on warrants increased by approximately ~~$32,000~~$1.8 million to ~~$20,000~~$1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~interest expense, net~~a loss of ~~$12,000~~$58,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. This represents the change in the fair market valuation of the warrants due mainly to the change in our stock price on the measurement date.

Interest expense, net increased by approximately $145,000 to $690,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 from $545,000 net for the three months ended September 30, 2020. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2017, $644,000 related to~~2021, there was approximately $5.5 million of gross interest expense incurred, ~~offset by $562,000~~$4.8 million of which was capitalized, ~~interest~~ and ~~$102,000 of~~no interest income. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2016, $553,000 related to~~2020, there was approximately $4.4 million of gross interest expense incurred, ~~offset by $486,000~~$3.8 million of which was capitalized, and interest ~~and $55,000~~income of ~~interest income.~~$53,000. The increase in gross interest ~~income, net,~~expense is due to the larger and growing borrowings outstanding on the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility during the period and secured line of credit as described in more detail in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.

Interest expense - amortization of deferred finance costs increased approximately $120,000 to $160,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 of $32,000 is primarily attributable to the overall increase in interest income on our average daily cash balance of approximately $43.5 million~~2021 from $40,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020. The increase was principally due to deferred finance costs related to the refinancing of the 237 11^th Loans that we closed on in June 2021 as ~~compared to approximately $26.8 million~~well as the of amortization of finance costs for our loans and secured line of credit that were not capitalized as part of real estate under development.

We recorded a $47,000 tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016, partially offset by the interest on the WPB Loan (see Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit –~~2021 compared to ~~our condensed consolidated financial statements) and interest rate increases period over period.~~

Amortization of deferred finance costs increased by approximately $106,000 to $145,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $39,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, $264,000 related to amortization of costs related to obtaining the loans encumbering 77 Greenwich, the West Palm Beach, Florida property and the lines of credit partially offset by $119,000 of costs capitalized to real estate under development. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, $125,000 related to amortization of costs related to obtaining the loans encumbering 77 Greenwich and the West Palm Beach, Florida property partially offset by $86,000 of costs capitalized to real estate under development.

Gain on sale from real estate for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $3.9 million due to the sale of the Westbury, New York property on August 4, 2017 which generated approximately $15.2 million$51,000 in ~~net proceeds. No properties were sold during the same period last year.~~

~~We recorded no~~ tax expense for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively.~~

2020.

Net loss ~~available~~attributable to common stockholders ~~increased~~decreased by approximately ~~$29,000~~$4.4 million to ~~$1.5~~$1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$1.4~~$5.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020 as a result of the changes discussed above, principally due to increased rental revenue and lower property operating expenses at 237 11^th as the remediation work is primarily completed and occupancy has increased to 92.4%, as well as the unrealized gain on warrants.

Results of Operations for the Nine ~~months~~Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 Compared to the Nine ~~months~~Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~

2020

Rental revenues in total increased by ~~$43,000~~approximately $753,000 to ~~$1.0~~$1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$974,000~~$774,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016. The~~2020. This consisted of an increase in ~~rental~~rent revenues ~~was mainly due~~of approximately $784,000 to the increased tenancy at the West Palm Beach, Florida property as well as revenues at the Westbury, New York property, partially offset by a non-cash rent adjustment for a tenant at the West Palm Beach, Florida property. Tenant reimbursements increased by $10,000 to $445,000$1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$435,000~~$701,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016. The increase~~2020, partially offset by a decrease in tenant reimbursements ~~was mainly due~~of approximately $31,000 to increased tenancy at the West Palm Beach, Florida property as well as revenues at the Westbury, New York property, partially offset by the catch-up of real estate tax recoveries in 2016 for certain tenants whose leases commenced in 2015.

~~Property operating expenses increased by $104,000 to $549,000~~$42,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$445,000~~$73,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016. These amounts consisted~~2020. The increase

Table of ~~costs incurred for maintenance~~Contents

in total revenues and ~~repairs, utilities~~its related components was due to higher occupancy, higher face rents and ~~general operating expenses~~less rent concessions at ~~our West Palm Beach, Florida property and~~237 11^th during the ~~Westbury, New York property. The increase was mainly~~nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020 due to the increased tenancy atfrom the ~~West Palm Beach, Florida property and~~progress made in remediating the ~~Westbury, New York property.~~construction related defects.

~~Real estate tax expense~~Other income increased by ~~$178,000~~approximately $101,000 to ~~$345,000~~$332,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from $231,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 from $167,000~~2020 which consisted mainly of the forgiveness of our PPP Loan of $243,000 during the nine months ending September 30, 2021, partially offset by lower SCA construction supervision fees we recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 in accordance with the revenue recognition policies effective after the closing on the sale of the school condominium to the SCA in April 2020.

In connection with the commencement of sales of residential condominium units for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2021, we recorded gross sales proceeds of approximately $1.45 million.

Property operating expenses decreased by approximately $1.7 million to $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The ~~increase~~decrease was principally due to expenses associated with 237 11^th, including approximately $1.9 million in lower costs incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020 to repair the construction related ~~to increased real~~defects, $80,000 less in other operating expenses, partially offset by $113,000 more in leasing commissions incurred as more apartment units are being leased as they are fully remediated. Property operating expenses consisted primarily of expenses incurred for utilities, payroll, COVID-19 related supplies and general operating expenses as well as repairs and maintenance and leasing commission at 237 11^th.

Real estate ~~taxes~~tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 of $57,000 remained fairly consistent with the nine months ended September 30, 2020 at ~~the West Palm Beach, Florida property and the Westbury, New York property.~~

$59,000.

General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately ~~$1.1~~$298,000 to $3.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~approximately $5.3~~$4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, approximately ~~$831,000~~$317,000 related to stock-based compensation, ~~$1.4~~$2.0 million related to payroll and payroll related expenses, ~~$1.2 million~~$788,000 related to other corporate ~~costs~~expenses, including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance and ~~$798,000~~$509,000 related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2020, approximately ~~$1.9 million~~$531,000 related to stock-based compensation, ~~$1.2~~$2.1 million related to payroll and payroll related ~~costs, $1.1 million~~expenses, $738,000 related to other corporate ~~costs~~expenses, including board fees, corporate office rent and insurance and ~~$1.1 million~~$583,000 related to legal, accounting and other professional fees. The overall decrease of approximately $1.1 million is mainly a result of a $1.1 million reduction in stock-based compensation related to restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that were granted in the first quarter of 2016, including grants of 99,000 RSUs that vested immediately.

~~Transaction~~Pension related costs decreased by ~~$22,000~~approximately $12,000 to ~~$77,000~~$483,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~$99,000~~$495,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. These costs represent professional fees and other periodic pension costs incurred in connection with the legacy Syms Pension Plan (see Note 7 – Pension Plan to our consolidated financial statements for further information).

In connection with the commencement of sales of residential condominium units for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded cost of sales of approximately $1.4 million, which consists of construction and capitalized operating costs that are allocated to the respective condominium units being sold.

Transaction related costs decreased by approximately $127,000 to $4,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from $131,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. These costs represent professional fees and other costs incurred in connection with ~~formation activities and~~ the underwriting and evaluation of potential acquisitions and investments for ~~deals~~transactions that were not consummated, as well as costs for potential leases at our retail properties that were not consummated.

Depreciation and amortization expense ~~increased by approximately $60,000 to $394,000~~ for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 from approximately $334,000 for~~2021 remained fairly consistent with the nine months ended September 30, 2016. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, approximately $184,000 related to depreciation for the West Palm Beach, Florida property and approximately $210,000 related to the amortization of trademarks and lease commissions.2020 at $2.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, approximately $116,000 related to~~2021, depreciation and amortization expense consisted of depreciation for ~~the West Palm Beach, Florida property~~237 11^th of approximately $1.3 million and ~~approximately $218,000 related to~~ the amortization of ~~trademarks~~lease commissions, acquired in-place leases and warrants of approximately $848,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, depreciation and amortization expense consisted of depreciation for 237 11^th of approximately $1.2 million and the amortization lease ~~commissions.~~commissions, acquired in-place leases and warrants of approximately $848,000. The slight increase in depreciation and amortization expense for the nine ~~month period ended September 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to West Palm Beach, Florida property.~~

~~Write-off of costs for the nine~~ months ended September 30, ~~2017 relating~~2021 compared to ~~demolished asset~~September 30, 2020 was ~~approximately $3.4 million. This is related to the 77 Greenwich property’s acceleration of depreciation of the building and building improvements and demolition costs at 77 Greenwich~~primarily due to ~~the completion~~amortization of ~~demolition~~warrants.

Table of ~~the 57,000 square foot six-story commercial building.~~Contents

~~Operating loss increased by approximately $2.6 million to $7.5~~Gain on sale of condominium of $24.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2020 consists of the sale of the school condominium to the SCA of $20.0 million and an additional gain of $4.2 million related to the recognition of our construction supervision fee. This gain was recorded upon the closing on the sale of the school condominium to the SCA in April 2020.

Equity in net loss from ~~$4.9~~unconsolidated joint ventures decreased by approximately $666,000 to $636,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 as a result of the changes in revenues and operating expenses as described above.~~

2020. Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint ~~venture for~~ventures represents our 50% share in The Berkley and our 10% share in 250 North 10^th. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 was approximately $804,000. This amount represents~~2021, our ~~50% share in the joint venture of the newly constructed 95-unit multi-family property in Brooklyn, New York purchased on December 5, 2016. Our~~ share of the loss is primarily comprised of operating income before depreciation of ~~$900,000~~$1.3 million offset by depreciation and amortization of ~~$1.2~~$1.1 million, interest expense of ~~$538,000~~$558,000 and ~~other expenses~~the change in the fair market value of ~~$6,000.~~the interest rate swap of $272,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, our share of the loss is primarily comprised of operating income before depreciation of $1.4 million offset by depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million (approximately $800,000 of which was our portion of the write-off of deferred finance costs in connection with the refinancing of the Berkley Loan during the nine months ended September 30, 2020) and interest expense of $609,000.

Unrealized loss on warrants increased by approximately $1.5 million to a $192,000 loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from a gain of $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This represents the change in the fair market valuation of the warrants due mainly to the change in our stock price on the measurement date.

Interest expense, net increased by approximately ~~$172,000~~$1.4 million to $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from ~~interest income, net of approximately $83,000~~$795,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2020. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, there was approximately ~~$1.8~~$15.8 million ~~related to~~of gross interest expense incurred, ~~offset by approximately $1.6~~$13.6 million of which was capitalized, ~~interest~~ and ~~$141,000~~$1,000 of interest income. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2020, there was approximately ~~$1.5~~$12.6 million ~~related to~~of gross interest expense incurred, ~~offset by approximately $1.4~~$11.7 million of which was capitalized, ~~interest~~ and ~~$194,000~~$57,000 of interest income. The increase in gross interest expense ~~net,~~is due to the larger and growing borrowings outstanding on the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility during the period, as well as new borrowings under the Corporate Credit Facility, Mezzanine Loan and secured line of credit as described in more detail in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.

Interest expense - amortization of deferred costs increased approximately $828,000 to $976,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 from $148,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase was principally due to deferred finance costs of ~~approximately $172,000 is primarily~~$567,000 that were expensed in June 2021 due to the refinancing of the 237 11^th Loan, as well as the amortization of finance costs for our loans and secured line of credit that were not capitalized as part of real estate under development.

We recorded $87,000 in tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to $218,000 in tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Net loss attributable to ~~interest~~common stockholders increased by approximately $24.2 million to $12.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from net income of $11.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as a result of the changes discussed above, principally due to the gain on sale of the ~~WPB~~school condominium to the SCA in April 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

COVID-19 Pandemic, Liquidity and Going Concern

The COVID-19 pandemic and related matters, including government actions, shifts in residential consumer sentiment and changes to the broader and local economies, have had a significant adverse impact on our business. While we believe many of these trends will reverse and the New York City economy and residential real estate markets will continue the improvement seen to date in 2021, given our focus on New York City residential real estate, our business has been particularly impacted, and may continue to be, as described elsewhere in this Quarter Report on Form 10-Q. Given the impacts of COVID-19, during the quarter ended September 30, 2021, certain events of default existed under the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, Mezzanine Loan and Corporate Credit Facility, creating substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern (see Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit – to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion regarding the events of defaults and the terms of the related forbearance agreements.) In October 2021, we refinanced the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and amended the Mezzanine Loan and Corporate

Table of Contents

Credit Facility, with the result being that the events of default described above were deemed waived or cured. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to the condensed consolidated financial ~~statements) and interest rate increases period over period partially offset by an overall increase in interest income on our average daily cash balance~~statements for further information. Further, although the impact of ~~approximately $34.9 million for~~ the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to approximately $31.3 million for~~pandemic has impeded the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~Amortization~~sale of deferred finance costs increased by approximately $285,000 to $345,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $60,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, $523,000 related to amortization of costs related to obtaining the loans encumberingresidential condominium units at 77 Greenwich, the ~~West Palm Beach, Florida property~~pace of signing contracts has increased in 2021, our condominium offering plan has been declared effective, closing of residential condominium units has commenced and is ongoing, and residents have begun to move into the ~~lines~~building. However, we have a limited amount of ~~credit, partially offset by $178,000~~unrestricted cash and liquidity available for working capital and our cash needs are variable under different circumstances. Although there are no assurances that any transactions will be completed on acceptable terms or at all, we are currently exploring pursuing a variety of costs capitalized to real estate under development. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, $318,000 related to amortization of costs related to obtaining the loan encumbering 77 Greenwich partially offset by $258,000 of costs capitalized to real estate under development.

We recorded an adjustment to our claims liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of $1.0 million due to the settlement with our insurance carrier. We recorded an adjustment to our claims liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $132,000 which was due mainly to the positive settlement of the former Majority Shareholder liability.

~~Gain on sale from real estate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $3.9 million due to~~capital raising and other transactions, including the sale of certain assets or interests in assets, capital raises through equity offerings, including the ~~Westbury, New York property on August 4, 2017 which generated approximately $15.2 million~~recently announced rights offering and our ATM Program, debt borrowings, refinancings and/or strategic transactions, in ~~net proceeds. No properties were sold during~~each case, with the ~~same period last year.~~

~~We recorded approximately $38,000 in tax expense for~~goal of maximizing the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017. We recorded no tax expense for~~value of the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~Net loss available to common stockholders decreased by $844,000 to $3.9 million for~~assets and attributes of the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~Liquidity and Capital Resources~~

Company while balancing short-term liquidity constraints.

We currently expect that our principal sources of funds to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements for working capital and funds for acquisition and development or redevelopment of properties, tenant improvements, leasing costs, and repayments of outstanding indebtedness will ~~include:~~

include some or all of the following:

(1)

cash on hand;

(2)

proceeds from new debt financings, increases to existing debt financings and/or other forms of secured or unsecured debt financing;

(3)

proceeds from ~~common stock~~equity or ~~preferred equity~~equity-linked offerings, including rights ~~offerings;~~offerings or convertible debt or equity or equity-linked securities issued in connection with debt financings;

(4)

cash flow from operations; and

(5)

net proceeds from divestitures of properties or interests in properties.

Cash flow from operations is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our portfolio, the net effective rental rates achieved on our leases, the collectability of rent, operating escalations and recoveries from our tenants and the level of operating and other costs.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2021, we had total cash and restricted cash of ~~$47.4~~$12.6 million, of which approximately ~~$34.9~~$917,000 was cash and cash equivalents and approximately $11.7 million was restricted cash. As of December 31, 2020, we had total cash and restricted cash of $16.1 million, of which approximately $6.5 million was cash and cash equivalents and approximately ~~$12.5 million was restricted cash. As of December 31, 2016, we had total cash of $8.4 million, of which approximately $4.7 million was cash and cash equivalents and approximately $3.7~~$9.6 million was restricted cash. Restricted cash represents amounts required to be restricted under our loan agreements, letters of credit (see Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit - to our ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial ~~statements)~~statements for further information), deposits on condominium sales at 77 Greenwich and tenant related security ~~deposits~~deposits.

See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to our consolidated financial statements for information on the private placement transaction and ~~deposits~~rights offering of common stock and Part II. Item 1A. Risk Factors, of this Quarterly Report on ~~property acquisitions. The increase in~~Form 10-Q for further information regarding our liquidity. As of October 31, 2021, we had total cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.0 million and approximately $10.5 million of restricted cash.

Corporate Credit Facility

In December 2019, we entered into a credit agreement (the “Corporate Credit Facility”) with an affiliate of a global institutional investment management firm as initial lender (the “CCF Lender”) and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as administrative agent (the “Corporate Facility Administrative Agent”), pursuant to which the CCF Lender agreed to extend us credit in multiple draws aggregating $70.0 million, which provided for an increase by $25.0 million subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and the consent of the CCF Lender. Draws under the Corporate Credit Facility were originally permitted to be made during the 32-month period following the closing date of the Corporate Credit Facility (the “Closing Date”). The Corporate Credit Facility matures on December 19, 2024, subject to extensions until December 19, 2025 and June 19, 2026, respectively, under certain circumstances. The Corporate Credit Facility provided for the proceeds of the Corporate Credit Facility to be used for investments in certain multi-family apartment buildings in the greater New York City area and certain non-residential real estate investments approved by the CCF Lender in its reasonable discretion, as well as in connection with certain property recapitalizations and in specified amounts for general corporate purposes and working capital. The Corporate Credit Facility bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (i) 5.25% and (ii) a scheduled interest rate (the “Cash Pay Interest Rate”) based on six-month periods from ~~January 1, 2017~~the Closing Date, which Cash Pay Interest Rate, from the Closing Date until the six-month anniversary of the Closing Date initially equaled 4.0% and increases by 125 basis points in each succeeding six-month period, subject to increase during the

Table of Contents

extension periods. A $2.45 million commitment fee was payable 50% on the initial draw and 50% as amounts under the Corporate Credit Facility are drawn, with any remaining balance due on the last date of the draw period, and a 1.0% exit fee is payable in respect of Corporate Credit Facility repayments. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2021, we had paid $1.85 million of the commitment fee. The Corporate Credit Facility may be prepaid at any time subject to a prepayment premium on the portion of the Corporate Credit Facility being repaid.

At September 30, 2021, the Corporate Credit Facility had an outstanding balance of $35.75 million, excluding deferred finance fees of $3.2 million, and an effective interest rate of 9.63%. Accrued interest totaled approximately $3.0 million at September 30, 2021. (See Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion).

In connection with the December 2020 transaction noted below, the Company entered into an amendment to the Corporate Credit Facility (the “Corporate Facility Amendment”) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the CCF Lender and the Corporate Facility Administrative Agent permitted the Company to enter into the Mezzanine Loan Agreement (as defined below), the amendment to the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and related documents, (ii) the commitment made by the CCF Lender under the Corporate Credit Facility was ~~primarily~~reduced by the amount of the Mezzanine Loan (as defined below) from $70.0 million to $62.5 million, subject to increase by $25.0 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions and the consent of the CCF Lender, and (iii) the multiple on invested capital, or MOIC, amount that would be due and payable by the Company upon the final repayment of the loan pursuant to the Corporate Credit Facility if no event of default exists and is continuing under the Corporate Credit Facility at any time prior to December 22, 2022, was amended to combine the Corporate Credit Facility and the Mezzanine Loan for purposes of calculating the MOIC, to the extent not previously paid, if any. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to the consolidated financial statements for details regarding a further amendment.

In connection with the Corporate Credit Facility, we also entered into a warrant agreement with the CCF Lender pursuant to which we issued to the CCF Lender ten-year warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 7,179,000 shares of our common stock. In connection with the Corporate Facility Amendment, the exercise price of the Warrants was amended from $6.50 per share to $4.50 per share, payable in cash or pursuant to a cashless exercise (see Note 10 – Stockholders Equity – Warrants to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding the warrants).

As of September 30, 2021, we were in compliance with all covenants of the Corporate Credit Facility, except for the CCF Defaults, which, together with the related CCF Forbearance Agreement, are described in Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to the consolidated financial statements. On October 22, 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, the Company entered into an amendment to the Corporate Credit Facility. As a result of the ~~closing~~refinancing transaction, the CCF Defaults no longer exist. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

237 11^th Loans

In May 2018, in connection with the acquisition of 237 11^th, we entered into two-year interest-only financings with an aggregate principal amount of $67.8 million, comprised of a ~~private placement~~$52.4 million mortgage loan and a $15.4 million mezzanine loan bearing interest at a blended average rate of ~~shares~~3.72% over the 30-day LIBOR, each with a one-year extension option upon satisfaction of ~~common stock~~certain conditions. The mezzanine loan was repaid in full in February ~~2017~~2020. In June 2020, the maturity of the 237 11^th mortgage loan was extended to June 2021 and amended to include a delayed draw facility of $4.25 million. In conjunction with the amendment, a LIBOR floor of 50 basis points was put in ~~which~~place, the spread was increased by 25 basis points to 2.25% and the exit fee was increased by 50 basis points to 1.0%. In June 2021, we ~~raised proceeds~~repaid the 237 11^th mortgage loan’s balance of ~~approximately $26.6 million (net of $0.3~~$56.4 million in ~~costs)~~full and paid an exit fee of $567,000.

Simultaneously, in June 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the 237 11^th mortgage loan, we entered into a $50.0 million senior loan (the “237 11^th Senior Loan”) and a $10 million mezzanine loan (the “237 11^th Mezz Loan” and together with the 237 11^th Senior Loan, the “237 11^th Loans”), provided by Natixis, bearing interest at a blended rate of 3.05% per annum. The 237 11^th Loans have an initial term of two years and has three one-year extension options. The first extension option is not subject to satisfaction of any financial tests. $1.5 million of the 237 11^th Senior Loan proceeds were held back by Natixis to cover debt service and operating expense shortfalls, as well as leasing related costs. There is an outstanding balance of $48.7 million from the ~~consummation~~237 11^th Senior Loan and $10.0 million from the 237 11^th Mezz Loan at September 30, 2021.

Table of Contents

From time to time, properties that we own, acquire or develop may experience defects, including concealed defects, or damage due to natural causes, defective workmanship or other reasons. In these situations, we pursue our rights and remedies as appropriate with insurers, contractors, sellers and others. Due to certain construction defects at 237 11^th that resulted in water penetration into the building and damage to certain apartment units and other property, which defects we believe were concealed and which would have required significant invasive work of a type not usually required or permitted, especially on a newly-built asset, to be detected, we submitted proofs of loss to our insurance carrier for property damage and business interruption (lost revenue) in March 2019. The insurance carrier subsequently disclaimed coverage for the losses and we filed a complaint against the carrier and its administrator, alleging that they breached the insurance policy by denying coverage and requesting a declaration that they are obligated to cover the claimed damage. We also filed legal claims against the seller, its parent company, and the general contractor to recover damages arising from the defective construction. In addition, the general contractor has impleaded into that litigation several subcontractors who performed work on the property. Management expects to recover some portion of the cost incurred to repair the property through the litigations and/or settlement negotiations with the seller, its parent company, the general contractor, the subcontractors, and the insurance carrier, although the amount of damages that may be recoverable in litigation and/or potential settlement negotiations are uncertain at this time, as is the receipt of any such payments, which has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including the resulting backlog in the court system and slowdown in judicial proceedings. A mediation process commenced at the end of February 2021 with the seller, its parent company, the general contractor, and the third-party defendants impleaded by the general contractor to potentially settle the case involving those parties. We incurred significant cash outflows for costs associated with these repairs and remediation, which commenced in September 2019. Remediation and restoration work was delayed for two months in 2020 due to the temporary shutdown of non-essential construction projects in New York from April to June, which resulted in a delay in commencement of our ~~Rights Offering~~leasing up of the property. Future delays would have a similar impact. As of September 30, 2021, remediation work is complete, other than a few specific units. We have seen a significant increase in traffic to view these units since they became available in May 2021 and we have already leased most of the remediated units. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, we collected 100% of rent due. As of October 31, 2021, the property was approximately 92.4% leased.

77 Greenwich Construction Facility

In December 2017, we closed on a $189.5 million construction facility for 77 Greenwich (the “77 Greenwich Construction Facility”). We drew down proceeds as costs related to the construction of the new mixed-use building were incurred. There was an outstanding balance of approximately $159.4 million and $139.0 million on the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. See Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion. As of September 30, 2021, we were in compliance with all covenants of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, except for the Senior Loan Defaults, which, together with the related 77 Greenwich Forbearance Agreement, are described in Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to the consolidated financial statements. As a result of the refinancing transaction in October 2021, the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility was repaid in full and the Senior Loan Defaults were deemed to have been waived. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

In early April ~~2017~~2020, New York State required all non-essential construction projects be shut down due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, the construction of 77 Greenwich was temporarily suspended. Construction recommenced mid-April, initially on a modified basis, as certain work was deemed "essential" construction. Since June 2020, a full crew has been on site and operating in accordance with applicable guidelines in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Future delays in construction may result in a delay in our ability to complete the construction project on its original timeline and our ability to sell condominium units. We are receiving our TCOs in stages which we ~~raised proceeds~~anticipate will continue through 2022, with TCOs having been received in March 2021 and June 2021, respectively, which covers floors 11-26 and 28, the lobby, mechanical rooms and portions of ~~approximately $13.9 million (net~~the cellar. Floors 27, 29-34 and 36-39 have passed inspection and a TCO for these floors is currently pending with the Department of ~~$0.2 million~~Buildings.

Upon the granting of our first TCO in ~~costs), which~~March 2021 and 16 units under contract, our offering plan was ~~partially offset by payments for operating expenses~~declared effective. We submitted our request to create separate tax lots to the department of finance and ~~pre-development activities. In addition, on August 4, 2017, we sold our property located in Westbury, New York which generated approximately $15.2 million in net proceeds.~~

~~On February 22, 2017, we entered into two secured lines of credit for an aggregate of $12.0 million, with Sterling National Bank as~~ the ~~lender, which~~tax lots were ~~secured by our properties located in Paramus, New Jersey, and Westbury, New York, respectively, and had an original maturity date of February 22, 2018. On August 4, 2017, we~~created. We closed on the sale of one residential condominium unit during the ~~Westbury, New York property~~third quarter of 2021 and expect additional closings on the residential condominium units for which we have TCOs to continue throughout the fourth quarter of 2021 and beyond.

Table of Contents

Mezzanine Loan

In December 2020, we entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with an affiliate of the CCF Lender (the “Mezzanine Loan Agreement”, and the ~~$2.9~~loan thereunder, the “Mezzanine Loan”). The Mezzanine Loan was originally for the amount of $7.5 million and has a term of three years with two one-year extension options, exercisable under certain circumstances. The collateral for the Mezzanine Loan was the borrower’s equity interest in its direct, wholly-owned subsidiary, which owns 100% of the equity interests in the borrower under the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility. The blended interest rate for the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and the Mezzanine Loan, assuming the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility and the Mezzanine Loan are fully drawn, was 9.44% on an annual basis. Interest on the Mezzanine Loan is not payable on a monthly basis but instead is automatically added to the unpaid principal amount on a monthly basis (and therefore accrues interest) and is payable in full on the maturity date of the Mezzanine Loan. Accrued interest totaled approximately $867,000 at September 30, 2021 (see Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion). Upon final repayment of the Mezzanine Loan, a MOIC will be due on substantially the same terms as provided for in the Corporate Credit Facility. The Mezzanine Loan may not be prepaid prior to prepayment in full of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, but if the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility is being prepaid in full, the Mezzanine Loan may be prepaid simultaneously therewith. Subject to the prior sentence the Mezzanine Loan may be prepaid in whole or in part, without penalty or premium (other than payment of the MOIC amount, if applicable, as provided above), upon prior written notice to the lender under the Mezzanine Loan. In connection with the Mezzanine Loan, the Company entered into a completion guaranty, carry guaranty, equity funding guaranty, recourse guaranty and environmental indemnification undertaking substantially consistent with the Company’s existing guarantees made to the 77 Greenwich Lender in connection with the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility.

As of September 30, 2021, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Mezzanine Loan, except for the Mezzanine Loan Defaults, which, together with the related Mezzanine Loan Forbearance Agreement, are described in Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit to the consolidated financial statements. On October 22, 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, the Company entered into an amendment to the Mezzanine Loan which, among other things, increased the amount of the loan thereunder by approximately $22.77 million, of which $0.77 million reflects interest previously accrued under the original Mezzanine Loan. As a result of the refinancing transaction in October 2021, the Mezzanine Loan Defaults were deemed to have been waived. See Note 13 – Subsequent Events to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

Secured Line of Credit

Our $12.75 million secured line of credit ~~that was secured by this property, which was undrawn, matured on that date. The $9.1 million line of credit, which~~with Sterling National Bank is secured by the Paramus, New Jersey ~~property, was undrawn as of September 30, 2017 and November 9, 2017. This line of credit was increased~~property. In March 2021, we entered into an amendment to ~~$11.0 million in September 2017, and we extended~~extend the maturity date to ~~February 22, 2019.~~March 2022. The secured line of credit, ~~bears~~which prior to the amendment, bore interest ~~for drawn amounts only,~~ at ~~100~~200 basis points over ~~Prime, as defined, with a floor~~the 30-day LIBOR, now bears interest at the prime rate, currently 3.25%. The secured line of ~~3.75%, and~~credit is pre-payable at any time without penalty. As of September 30, 2021, the secured line of credit had an outstanding balance of $11.95 million and an effective interest rate of 3.25%. We have historically extended this loan on an annual basis. Although there can be no assurances as to the future, we have a good relationship with our lender and expect to once again extend this loan in advance of its maturity date.

The Berkley Loan

We own a 50% interest in a joint venture formed to acquire and operate The Berkley. In December 2016, the joint venture closed on the acquisition of The Berkley through a wholly-owned special purpose entity for a purchase price of $68.885 million, of which $42.5 million was financed through a 10-year loan (the “Berkeley Loan”) secured by The Berkley, and the balance was paid in cash, half of which was funded by us. On February 28, 2020, in connection with a refinancing, the Berkley Loan was repaid in full and it was replaced with a new 7-year, $33.0 million loan (the “New Berkley Loan”) which bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.717% and is interest only during the initial five years. It is pre-payable at any time and can be increased by up to $6.0 million under certain circumstances. We and our joint venture partner are joint and several recourse carve-out guarantors under the New Berkley Loan.

250 North 10^th Note

Table of Contents

purchase price of $137.75 million, of which $82.75 million was financed through a 15-year mortgage loan (the “250 North 10^thNote”) secured by 250 North 10^th and the balance was paid in cash. Our share of the equity totaling approximately $5.9 million was funded through a loan (the “Partner Loan”) from our joint venture partner. The Partner Loan bears interest at 7.0% and is prepayable any time within its four year term. Our partner has the option of having the Partner Loan repaid in our common stock if the price of our common stock exceeds $6.50 per share at the time of conversion. The non-recourse 250 North 10^th Note bears interest at 3.39% for the duration of the loan term and has covenants, defaults, and a non-recourse carve out guaranty executed by us. We earned an acquisition fee at closing and are entitled to ongoing asset management fees and a promote upon the achievement of certain performance hurdles.

At-The-Market Equity Offering Program

In August 2021, we entered into an "at-the-market" equity offering program (the “ATM Program”), to sell up to an aggregate of $10.0 million in shares of our common stock.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, we sold 149,757 shares of our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $306,000 (excluding approximately $144,000 in professional and brokerage fees) at a weighted average price of $2.04 per share. As of September 30, 2021, approximately $9.7 million of our common stock remained available for issuance under the ATM Program.

Cash Flows

Cash Flows for the Nine ~~months~~Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 Compared to the Nine ~~months~~Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~

2020

Net cash used in operating activities ~~was~~decreased by approximately ~~$7.1~~$5.6 million to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 as compared to approximately $11.0~~2021 from $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016. The~~2020. This decrease ~~of approximately $3.9 million of net cash used~~ was mainly due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and pension liabilities of $7.1 million over the $1.6 million write-off of costs relating to the demolished asset at the 77 Greenwich property due to its completion of demolition and a one-time $6.9 million payment to the former majority shareholder made during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which wassame period last year, partially offset by a decrease in receivables and prepaid expenses and other assets, net of $2.6 million over the ~~gain on the sale of the Westbury, New York property of approximately $3.9 million.~~

same period last year.

Net cash used in investing activities ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was~~decreased by approximately ~~$17,000 as compared~~$18.9 million to ~~approximately $15.6~~$29.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2021 from $48.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to our investment in our joint venture for The Berkley in connection with the pay-down of ~~approximately $15.6~~$5.4 million ~~mainly pertained to~~in debt and our $5.2 million investment in 250 North 10^th JV during the ~~net proceeds from the sale of the Westbury, New York property on August 4, 2017 of approximately $15.2 million~~nine months ended September 30, 2020 as well as ~~approximately $5.1~~$9.0 million less in ~~development work being performed~~net additions to real estate this ~~year at our properties~~period compared to the same period last year, partially offset by ~~approximately $4.7 million more in restricted cash which was used for an $8.1 million initial deposit for~~a decrease of $643,000 of deferred real estate deposits on the ~~option~~residential condominiums compared to ~~purchase a property at 237 11th Street, Brooklyn, New York.~~the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Net cash provided by financing activities ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was~~decreased by approximately ~~$37.3~~$27.4 million ~~as compared~~ to ~~approximately $6.7~~$27.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2021 from $54.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily relates to the $20.4 million, $58.7 million and $3.3 million in borrowings from the 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, the New 237 11^th Loans and the 237 11^th Loan, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 as compared to borrowing $34.0 million, $30.3 million, $5.2 million and $243,000 in proceeds from the Corporate Credit Facility, 77 Greenwich Construction Facility, 250 North 10^th Note and the Paycheck Protection Program loan, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This increase mainly results from our private placement of common stock in February 2017 in which we raised net proceeds of approximately $26.6 million as well as our Rights Offering in April 2017 in which we raised net proceeds of approximately $13.9 million,was partially offset by ~~an increase~~the payment of ~~net cash used in financing activities~~the 237 11^th Loan of ~~$0.6~~$56.4 million ~~from~~during the ~~prior year related~~nine months ended September 30, 2021 compared to repaying the ~~repurchase of common stock from certain employees in order to pay withholding taxes~~$15.4 million 237 11^th mezzanine loan and $2.5 million on the ~~common stock which vested~~Secured Line of Credit during the ~~period as well as $8.7 million of net proceeds last year from the Loan.~~nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Net Operating Losses

We believe that our U.S. ~~Federal~~federal NOLs as of the emergence date of the Syms bankruptcy ~~Plan~~ were approximately $162.8 million and ~~believe~~ our U.S. ~~Federal~~federal NOLs atas of September 30, ~~2017~~2021 were approximately ~~$230.3~~$244.3 million. In connection with the conveyance of the school condominium to the SCA, we applied approximately $11.6 million of federal NOLs against taxable capital gains of approximately $18.5 million. Since 2009 through September 30, 2021, we have utilized approximately $23.8 million of the federal NOLs. Pursuant to the TCJA, corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards are eligible for a 50% refund in tax years 2018 through 2020, and beginning in tax year 2021, any remaining AMT credit carryforwards are 100% refundable. As a result of these new rules, we had released our valuation

Table of Contents

allowance of $3.1 million in 2017 which was formerly reserved against our AMT credit carryforwards. We had recorded a tax benefit and refund receivable of $3.1 million in 2017 in connection with this valuation allowance release. We received approximately $1.6 million of the refund receivable in October 2019 and the balance of approximately $1.5 million in July 2020.

On March 27, 2020, the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act” was signed into law. The CARES Act accelerated the ability of corporations to recover AMT credits, permitting a full refund for tax years 2018 and 2019. The CARES Act also included provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferral of employer side social security payments, net operating loss carrybacks and carryforwards, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations, increased limitations on qualified charitable contributions, and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. It also appropriated funds for the SBA Paycheck Protection Program loans that are forgivable in certain situations to promote continued employment, as well as Economic Injury Disaster Loans to provide liquidity to small businesses harmed by COVID-19. Management is monitoring the impact that the CARES Act may have on the Company. The CARES Act did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for nine months ended September 30, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020.

Based on management’s assessment, it is more likely than not that the entire deferred tax assets will not be realized by future taxable income or tax planning ~~strategy.~~strategies. Accordingly, a valuation allowance of ~~$96.8~~$65.8 million was recorded as of September 30, ~~2017.~~

2021.

We believe that certain of the transactions that occurred in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy in September 2012, including the rights offering and the redemption of the Syms shares owned by the former ~~Majority Shareholder that occurred~~majority shareholder of Syms in ~~connection~~accordance with ~~our emergence from bankruptcy on September 14, 2012~~the plan of reorganization, resulted in us undergoing an “ownership change,” as that term is used in Section 382 of the Code. However, while the analysis is complex and subject to subjective determinations and uncertainties, we believe that we should qualify for treatment under Section 382(l)(5) of the Code. As a result, we ~~currently~~ believe that our NOLs are not subject to an annual limitation under ~~Code~~ Section 382. However, if we were to undergo a subsequent ownership change in the future, our ability to utilize our NOLs could be subject to limitation under ~~Code~~ Section 382. In addition, the TCJA limited the deductibility of NOLs arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of taxable income (computed without regard to the net operating loss deduction) for the taxable year. However, the CARES Act suspended the 80% limitation on the use of NOLs for tax years beginning before January 1, 2021, and allowed losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2021 to be carried back up to five years.

~~Notwithstanding the above, even~~Even if all of our regular U.S. Federal income tax liability for a given year is reduced to zero by virtue of utilizing our NOLs, we may still be subject to ~~the U.S. Federal alternative minimum tax and to~~ state, local or other non-federal income taxes.

Our certificate of incorporation includes a provision intended to help preserve certain tax benefits primarily associated with our ~~NOLs (the “Protective Amendment”). The Protective Amendment~~NOLs. This provision generally prohibits transfers of stock that would result in a person or group of persons becoming a 4.75% stockholder, or that would result in an increase or decrease in stock ownership by a person or group of persons that is an existing 4.75% stockholder.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including information included or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on or any supplement to this Quarterly Report, may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ~~(the “Securities Act”),~~ and ~~Section 21E of~~ the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions that are not historical facts, and other statements identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” ~~believes,~~“believes,” “plans,” “estimates,” “potential,” “continues,” or ~~“continue,~~“explores,” or the negative thereof or other and similar expressions. In addition, in some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “trend,” “potential,” “opportunity,” “believe,” “comfortable,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “current,” “intention,” “estimate,” “position,” “assume,” “outlook,” “continue,” “remain,” “maintain,” “sustain,” “seek,” “achieve,” and similar expressions. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including among others:

·●

risks and uncertainties as to the terms, timing, structure, benefits and costs of any capital raising or strategic transaction and whether one will be consummated on terms acceptable to us or at all;

Table of Contents

●

our limited cash resources, generation of minimal revenues from operations, and our reliance on external sources of financing to fund operations in the future;

●

our ability to execute our business plan, including as it relates to the final stages of development and close out of ~~our largest asset, a property located~~and continued residential condominium sales at 77 ~~Greenwich Street in Lower Manhattan;~~Greenwich;

·●

risks associated with our debt, including the risk of defaults on our obligations and debt service requirements;

●

risks associated with covenant restrictions in our loan documents that could limit our flexibility to execute our business plan;

●

the impact of COVID-19;

●

adverse trends in the ~~Manhattan~~New York City residential condominium market;

·●

~~our ability to obtain additional financing and refinance existing loans and on favorable terms;~~

~~our limited operating history;~~

general economic and business conditions, including with respect to real estate, and their effect on the New York City real estate market in particular;

·●

our ability to obtain additional financing and refinance existing loans and on favorable terms;

●

our investment in property development may be more costly than anticipated and investment returns from our properties planned to be developed may be less than anticipated;

●

our ability to enter into new leases and renew existing leases with tenants at our commercial and residential properties;

●

we may acquire properties subject to unknown or known liabilities, with limited or no recourse to the seller;

●

risks associated with the effect that rent stabilization regulations may have on our ability to raise and collect rents;

●

competition for new acquisitions and investments;

●

risks associated with acquisitions and investments in owned and leased real estate generally, including risks related to closing, obtaining suitable financing in connection with and achieving the intended benefits of the potential acquisition of the apartment building located at 237 11th Street, Brooklyn, New York;estate;

·●

risks associated with joint ventures;

●

our ability to ~~enter into new leases and renew existing leases;~~maintain certain state tax benefits with respect to certain of our properties;

·●

our ability to obtain required permits, site plan approvals and/or other governmental approvals in connection with the development or redevelopment of our properties;

·●

costs associated with complying with environmental laws and environmental contamination, as well as the ~~influence of certain significant stockholders;~~Americans with Disabilities Act or other safety regulations and requirements;

·●

~~potential conflicts~~loss of ~~interest as a result of certain of our directors having affiliations with certain of our stockholders;~~key personnel;

·●

~~limitations in our certificate~~the effects of ~~incorporation on acquisitions and dispositions of our common stock designed to protect our ability to utilize our NOLs and certain other~~new tax ~~attributes, which may not succeed in protecting our ability to utilize such tax attributes, and/or may limit the liquidity of our common stock;~~laws;

·●

our ability to utilize our NOLs to offset future taxable income and capital gains for U.S. Federal, state and ~~state~~local income tax purposes;

37●

risks associated with current political and economic uncertainty, and developments related to the outbreak of contagious diseases;

●

risks associated with breaches of information technology systems;

●

stock price volatility and other risks associated with a lightly traded stock;

Table of Contents

·●

stockholders may be diluted by the ~~failure~~issuance of additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock in the future;

●

a declining stock price may make it more difficult to raise capital in the future;

●

the influence of certain significant stockholders;

●

limitations in our charter on transactions in our common stock by substantial stockholders, designed to protect our ability to utilize our NOLs and certain other tax attributes, may not succeed and/or may limit the liquidity of our ~~wholly-owned subsidiaries to repay outstanding indebtedness;~~common stock;

·●

~~stock price volatility;~~

~~loss of key personnel;~~

certain provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may have the effect of making more difficult or otherwise discouraging, delaying or deterring a takeover or other change of control of us;

·●

~~competition;~~certain provisions in our charter documents may have the effect of limiting our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for certain disputes; and

·●

~~risks associated with partnerships or joint ventures; and~~

unanticipated difficulties which may arise and other factors which may be outside our control or that are not currently known to us or which we believe are not material.

In evaluating such statements, you should specifically consider the risks identified under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our ~~2016~~2020 Annual Report for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March ~~15, 2017,~~31, 2021, and under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcomes may vary materially from those contemplated by any forward looking statements. Subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph and elsewhere described in ~~the aforementioned 2016~~our 2020 Annual Report, this Form 10-Q and other reports filed with the SEC. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q or, in the case of any documents incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, the date of such document, in each case based on information available to us as of such date, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and other market changes affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk which we are exposed to is interest rate risk.

Low to moderate levels of inflation during the past several years have favorably impacted our operations by stabilizing operating expenses. At the same time, low inflation has had the indirect effect of reducing our ability to increase tenant rents. However, our tenant leases include expense reimbursements and other provisions to minimize the effect of inflation.

The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or interest rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps, caps, collars, and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We do not have any foreign operations and thusAs a smaller reporting company, we are not ~~exposed~~required to ~~foreign currency fluctuations.~~

As of September 30, 2017, our debt consisted of two variable-rate secured mortgage loans payable, with carrying values of $40.0 million and $9.1 million, which approximated their fair values at September 30, 2017. We also have a secured line of credit of $11.0 million that was undrawn as of September 30, 2017. Changes in market interest rates on our variable-rate debt impactprovide the fair value of the loans and interest incurred or cash flow. For instance, if interest rates increase 100 basis points and our variable-rate debt balance remains constant, we expect the fair value of our obligation to decrease, the same way the price of a bond declines as interest rates rise. The sensitivity analysis related to our variable–rate debt assumes an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates from their September 30, 2017 levels, with all other variables held constant. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our variable-rate debtdisclosure required by $0.6 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of our variable-rate debt by $0.6 million. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates changes on our borrowing costs, and assuming no other changes in our capital structure.this Item.

As of September 30, 2017, the debt on the unconsolidated joint venture, in which we hold a 50% interest, consisted of a variable-rate secured mortgage loan payable, with a carrying value of $42.5 million (see Note 12 – Investment in Our Unconsolidated Joint Venture – to our condensed consolidated financial statements), which approximated its fair value at September 30, 2017. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates on the loan taken out by the unconsolidated joint venture would result in a decrease in the fair value of the joint ventures’ variable-rate debt by $0.5 million. A 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in an increase in the fair value of the joint ventures’ variable-rate debt by $0.5 million. These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates changes on borrowing costs, and assuming no other changes in the capital structure of the joint venture.

As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed as of September 30, 2017, it does not consider exposures or positions arising after that date. The information represented herein has limited predictive value. Future actual realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on cumulative exposures, hedging strategies employed and the magnitude of the fluctuations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~

a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within ~~Trinity~~the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports.

Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange ~~Act~~Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that ~~our disclosure controls and procedures were effective~~ as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q.~~10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurance to the timely collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to the Company what would potentially be subject to disclosure under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

~~Internal Control Over Financial Reporting~~

Table of Contents

b)Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There ~~were~~have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the ~~three months ended~~period from July 1, 2021 to September 30, ~~2017,~~2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

~~PART II.~~

~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

~~Item 1.~~

~~Legal Proceedings~~

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

WeIn the normal course of business, we are a party to routine legal ~~proceedings, which are primarily incidental to our former business. Some of the actions to which we are a party are covered by insurance and are being defended or reimbursed by our insurance carriers.~~proceedings. Based on ~~an analysis performed by our actuary~~advice of counsel and available information, including current status or stage of proceeding, and taking into account accruals where they have been established, management currently believes that any liabilities ultimately resulting from ~~this routine~~ litigation we are currently involved in will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial ~~position. Additionally, as discussed in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, we currently operate under the Plan that was approved in connection with the resolution~~position, results of ~~the Chapter 11 cases involving Syms and its subsidiaries.~~operations or liquidity.

~~Item 1A.~~

~~Risk Factors~~

~~There are no material changes to the~~Item 1A. Risk Factors

Numerous factors affect our business and results of operations, many of which are beyond our control. In addition to information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully read and consider "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in Part I and "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which describe significant risks that may cause our actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently anticipated or expected.

We have a limited amount of unrestricted cash and liquidity and variable cash needs. If we are not successful in raising additional capital, receiving significant amounts on account of our claims involving 237 11^thand/or consummating a strategic transaction in a timely manner, we would have insufficient cash and liquidity to service our debt and pay operating expenses and other obligations. Any such event would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We have a limited amount of unrestricted cash and liquidity available for working capital and our cash needs are variable under different circumstances. We are currently exploring pursuing a variety of capital raising and other transactions, including the sale of assets or interests in assets, capital raises through equity offerings, including the recently announced rights offering and our ATM Program, debt borrowings, refinancings and/or strategic transactions, in each case, with the goal of maximizing the value of the assets and attributes of the Company while balancing short-term liquidity constraints. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining capital sufficient to meet our operating needs or consummating any such strategic transaction, in each case, on terms or a timeframe acceptable to us or at all. If we are not successful in raising additional capital, at the asset level and/or corporate level, receiving significant amounts on account of our claims involving 237 11^thand/or consummating a strategic transaction in a timely manner, and depending on how much capital is raised in the recently announced rights offering and our ATM Program, we would have insufficient cash and liquidity to service our debt and pay operating expenses and other obligations. See Note 1 – Business to our consolidated financial statements for more information regarding the impact of the pandemic, our ability to continue as ~~disclosed in our 2016 Annual Report.~~a going concern and related matters.

~~Item 2.~~

~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Table of Contents

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In December 2019, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which we can purchase up to $5.0 million of shares of our common stock, which is now subject to the terms of our Corporate Credit Facility. Repurchases under the stock repurchase program may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions at times and on such terms and in such amounts as management deems appropriate, subject to market conditions, regulatory requirements and other factors. The program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of common stock, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice.

Since inception of the stock repurchase program through September 30, 2021, the Company has repurchased 250,197 shares of common stock for approximately $483,361, or an average price per share of $1.93. As of September 30, 2021, approximately $4.5 million of shares remained available for purchase under the stock repurchase program, subject to the terms of our Corporate Credit Facility. There was no stock repurchase activity by the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” of the Company, as defined in Rune 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, during the three months ended September 30, 2021.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

See discussion of CCF Defaults, Senior Loan Defaults and Mezzanine Loan Defaults in “Note 5 – Loans Payable and Secured Line of Credit” and “Note 13 – Subsequent Events” under “Part I, Item 1. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”, which is incorporated in this item by reference.

~~Item 3.~~

~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~

~~None.~~

~~Item 4.~~

~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

On November 10, 2021, the Company entered into an amendment to the Corporate Credit Facility (“Corporate Credit Facility Amendment”) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the MOIC amount due upon final repayment of the Corporate Credit Facility loan was amended to be consistent with the Mezzanine Loan such that if no event of default exists and is continuing under the Corporate Credit Facility at any time prior to June 22, 2023, the amount due will be combined with the Mezzanine Loan, to the extent not previously paid, if any, and (ii) the amount of the Corporate Credit Facility used to calculate the MOIC was reduced to $35.75 million. The foregoing description of the Corporate Credit Facility Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreement, a copy of which is attached herewith as Exhibit 10.8 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents

~~Item 5.~~

~~Other Information~~

~~None.~~

~~Item 6.~~

~~Exhibits~~

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Form 8-K filed by us on February 13, 2015).

3.2	Bylaws of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 8-K filed by us on September 19, 2012).

10.1* 10.1	~~Option~~Trinity Place Holdings Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, effective April 23, 2021) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed by us on July 2, 2021).

10.2	Master Loan Agreement, dated as of ~~September 8, 2017,~~October 22, 2021 by and between ~~470 4~~^th ~~Avenue Investors~~TPHGreenwich Owner LLC, as borrower, and ~~470 4~~^th ~~Avenue Fee Owner, LLC.~~Macquarie PF Inc., as lender and administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed by us on October 25, 2021).

31.1* 10.3	Guaranty of Payment and Completion, dated as of October 22, 2021, by TPHGreenwich Owner LLC, as borrower, and Trinity Place Holdings Inc., to and for the benefit of Macquarie PF Inc., as lender and administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K filed by us on October 25, 2021).

10.4	Interest and Carry Guaranty, made as of October 22, 2021 by Trinity Place Holdings Inc. to Macquarie PF Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 8-K filed by us on October 25, 2021).

10.5	Amended and Restated Mezzanine Loan Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2021 by and among TPHGreenwich Subordinate Mezz LLC, as borrower, TPHGreenwich Mezz LLC, as additional pledger, TPHS Lender II LLC, as lender and TPHS Lender II LLC, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Form 8-K filed by us on October 25, 2021).
10.6*	Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2020, among Trinity Place Holdings Inc., as Borrower, each subsidiary of Borrower listed on the signature pages thereto, as a guarantor, the lenders party thereto, and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as administrative agent.
10.7	Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2021, among Trinity Place Holdings Inc., as Borrower, each subsidiary of Borrower listed on the signature pages thereto, as a guarantor, the lenders party thereto, and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Form 8-K filed by us on October 25, 2021).

10.8*	Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2021, among Trinity Place Holdings Inc., as Borrower, each subsidiary of Borrower listed on the signature pages thereto, as a guarantor, the lenders party thereto, and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC, as administrative agent.
10.9	Private Placement Agreement, by and among the Company and the investors identified on Schedule A therein, dated as of October 22, 2021 (including the form of Registration Rights Agreement) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Form 8-K filed by us on October 25, 2021).
31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18.U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and 18.U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101*	The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 formatted inas inline XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2017~~2021 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2016~~2020 (audited), (ii) ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2021 (unaudited) and September 30, 2020 (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 (unaudited) and ~~the three and nine months ended~~ September 30, ~~2016~~2020 (unaudited), ~~(iii) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 (unaudited),~~ (iv) ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 (unaudited) and ~~nine months ended~~ September 30, ~~2016~~2020 (unaudited) ~~and~~, (v) Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). and (vi) Cover Page Interactive Data File.

104*	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

*Filed herewith

Filed herewith

**	Furnished herewith

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	TRINITY PLACE HOLDINGS INC.

Date: November ~~8, 2017~~ 12, 2021	By	/s/ Matthew Messinger
		MATTHEW MESSINGER
		PRESIDENT and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November ~~8, 2017~~ 12, 2021	By	/s/ Steven Kahn
		STEVEN KAHN
		CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
		(Principal Financial Officer)

~~Delaware~~	~~22-2465228~~
Delaware	22-2465228
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)

340 Madison Avenue, New York, New York	10173
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)


Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock $0.01 Par Value Per Share	TPHS	NYSE American

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS

Real estate, net	$	58,762		$	60,384
Cash and cash equivalents		34,876			4,678
Restricted cash		12,519			3,688
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture		12,860			13,939
Receivables, net		145			220
Deferred rents receivable		577			543
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net		2,770			2,149
Total assets	$	122,509		$	85,601

LIABILITIES

Loans payable, net	$	48,294		$	48,705
Secured line of credit		-			-
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		4,997			2,935
Pension liabilities		4,867			5,936
Total liabilities		58,158			57,576

Commitments and Contingencies

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Preferred stock, 40,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016		-			-
Special stock, $0.01 par value; 1 share authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016		-			-
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 79,999,997 shares authorized; 36,806,915 and 30,679,566 shares issued at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively; 31,451,796 and 25,663,820 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		368			307
Additional paid-in capital		130,275			87,521
Treasury stock (5,355,119 and 5,015,746 shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)		(53,666	)		(51,086	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,161	)		(3,161	)
Accumulated deficit		(9,465	)		(5,556	)

Total stockholders' equity		64,351			28,025

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	122,509		$	85,601


	September 30,		December 31,
	2021		2020
	(unaudited)		(audited)
ASSETS

Real estate, net	$	307,112	$	279,204
Cash and cash equivalents		917		6,515
Restricted cash		11,732		9,554
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net		3,555		2,703
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		18,056		19,379
Receivables		79		966
Deferred rents receivable		110		90
Right-of-use asset		1,374		1,565
Intangible assets, net		8,617		9,172
Total assets	$	351,552	$	329,148

LIABILITIES

Loans payable, net	$	223,503	$	197,330
Corporate credit facility, net		32,597		31,858
Secured line of credit, net		11,950		7,747
Note payable		5,863		5,863
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		18,457		15,896
Lease liability		1,516		1,716
Warrant liability		1,411		830
Total liabilities		295,297		261,240

Commitments and Contingencies

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding		0		0
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 2 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020		0		0
Special stock, $0.01 par value; 1 share authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020		0		0
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 79,999,997 shares authorized; 39,016,012 and 38,345,540 shares issued at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively; 32,618,137 and 32,172,107 shares outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively		390		383
Additional paid-in capital		136,672		135,978
Treasury stock (6,397,875 and 6,173,433 shares at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively)		(57,166)		(56,791)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,803)		(2,159)
Accumulated deficit		(21,838)		(9,503)

Total stockholders’ equity		56,255		67,908

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	351,552	$	329,148


	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2021		2020		2021		2020
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues
Rental revenues	$	803	$	196	$	1,527	$	774
Other income		30		80		332		231
Sale of residential condominium units		1,450		—		1,450		—
Total revenues		2,283		276		3,309		1,005

Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses		705		2,709		3,819		5,464
Real estate taxes		17		19		57		59
General and administrative		1,217		1,188		3,655		3,953
Pension related costs		158		165		483		495
Cost of sale - residential condominium units		1,417		—		1,417		—
Transaction related costs		—		27		4		131
Depreciation and amortization		716		690		2,146		2,076

Total operating expenses		4,230		4,798		11,581		12,178

Gain on sale of school condominium		—		—		—		24,196

Operating (loss) income		(1,947)		(4,522)		(8,272)		13,023

Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint ventures		—		(176)		(636)		(1,302)
Unrealized gain (loss) on warrants		1,718		(58)		(192)		1,330
Interest expense, net		(690)		(545)		(2,172)		(795)
Interest expense - amortization of deferred finance costs		(160)		(40)		(976)		(148)

(Loss) income before taxes		(1,079)		(5,341)		(12,248)		12,108

Tax benefit (expense)		47		(51)		(87)		(218)

Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(1,032)	$	(5,392)	$	(12,335)	$	11,890

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrealized gain on pension liability		119		112		356		337
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(913)	$	(5,280)	$	(11,979)	$	12,227

(Loss) income per share - basic	$	(0.03)	$	(0.17)	$	(0.38)	$	0.37
(Loss) income per share - diluted	$	(0.03)	$	(0.17)	$	(0.38)	$	0.36

Weighted average number of common shares - basic		32,756		32,297		32,681		32,290
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted		32,756		32,297		32,681		32,731


	☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		~~PAGE NO.~~
		PAGE NO.
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	3

	~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2017~~2021 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2016~~2020 (audited)	3

	~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and 2020 (unaudited) ~~and September 30, 2016 (unaudited)~~	4

	~~Condensed~~ Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and 2020 (unaudited)	5

	~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2021 and 2020 (unaudited) ~~and September 30, 2016 (unaudited)~~	6 7

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7 8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26 30

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	38 45

Item 4.4.	Controls and Procedures	40 45

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	40 46

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40 46

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	40 46

Item 2.2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	40 46

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	40 47

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	40 47

Item 5.	Other Information	41 47

Item 6.	Exhibits	41 48

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Three Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Revenues
Rental revenues	$	336		$	328		$	1,017		$	974
Tenant reimbursements		171			208			445			435

Total revenues		507			536			1,462			1,409

Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses		178			144			549			445
Real estate taxes		124			63			345			167
General and administrative		1,509			1,529			4,200			5,272
Transaction related costs		9			49			77			99
Depreciation and amortization		145			121			394			334
Write-off of costs relating to demolished asset		3,426			-			3,426			-

Total operating expenses		5,391			1,906			8,991			6,317

Operating loss		(4,884	)		(1,370	)		(7,529	)		(4,908	)

Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint venture		(296	)		-			(804	)		-
Interest income (expense), net		20			(12	)		(89	)		83
Amortization of deferred finance costs		(145	)		(39	)		(345	)		(60	)
Reduction of claims liability		-			(2	)		1,043			132

Loss before gain on sale of real estate and taxes		(5,305	)		(1,423	)		(7,724	)		(4,753	)

Gain on sale of real estate		3,853			-			3,853			-

Tax expense		-			-			(38	)		-

Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(1,452	)	$	(1,423	)	$	(3,909	)	$	(4,753	)

Loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.19	)

Weighted average number of common shares - basic and diluted		31,446			25,483			30,114			25,409


FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

											Accumulated
				Additional							Other
	Common Stock			Paid-In		Treasury Stock			Accumulated		Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Shares	Amount		Deficit		Loss		Total

Balance as of June 30, 2021 (unaudited)	38,853	$	389	$	136,329	(6,398)	$	(57,166)	$	(20,806)	$	(1,922)	$	56,824

Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—		—	—		—		(1,032)		—		(1,032)
Settlement of stock awards	13		—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Unrealized gain on pension liability	—		—		—	—		—		—		119		119
Sale of common stock	150		1		165	—		—		—		—		166
Stock-based compensation	—		—		178	—		—		—		—		178

Balance as of September 30, 2021 (unaudited)	39,016	$	390	$	136,672	(6,398)	$	(57,166)	$	(21,838)	$	(1,803)	$	56,255


FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

											Accumulated
				Additional							Other
	Common Stock			Paid-In		Treasury Stock			Accumulated		Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Shares	Amount		Deficit		Loss		Total

Balance as of December 31, 2020 (audited)	38,345	$	383	$	135,978	(6,173)	$	(56,791)	$	(9,503)	$	(2,159)	$	67,908

Net loss attributable to common stockholders	—		—		—	—		—		(12,335)		—		(12,335)
Settlement of stock awards	521		5		—	(225)		(375)		—		—		(370)
Unrealized gain on pension liability	—		—		—	—		—		—		356		356
Sale of common stock	150		2		165	—		—		—		—		167
Stock-based compensation	—		—		529	—		—		—		—		529

Balance as of September 30, 2021 (unaudited)	39,016	$	390	$	136,672	(6,398)	$	(57,166)	$	(21,838)	$	(1,803)	$	56,255


	For the		For the
	Nine Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
	2021		2020
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(12,335)	$	11,890
Adjustments to reconcile net loss (income) attributable to common stockholders to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization and amortization of deferred finance costs		3,122		2,224
Stock-based compensation expense		399		602
Gain on sale of school condominium		0		(24,196)
Gain on sale of residential condominium, net		(33)		0
Deferred rents receivable		(20)		(61)
Other non-cash adjustments - pension expense		356		337
Unrealized loss (gain) on warrants		192		(1,330)
Equity in net loss from unconsolidated joint ventures		636		1,302
Distribution from unconsolidated joint ventures		686		865
Loan forgiveness		(243)		0
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Receivables		887		2,319
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net		(846)		355
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		5,775		(807)
Pension liabilities		0		(509)
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,424)		(7,009)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to real estate		(30,784)		(39,772)
Deferred real estate deposits of condominiums		1,328		1,971
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		0		(10,575)
Net cash used in investing activities		(29,456)		(48,376)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from loans and corporate credit facility		82,318		69,740
Proceeds from secured line of credit		4,200		4,400
Payment of finance costs		(2,442)		(338)
Repayment of loan		(56,413)		(17,868)
Settlement of stock awards		(370)		(695)
Stock buy-back		0		(360)
Sale of common stock		167		0
Net cash provided by financing activities		27,460		54,879

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH		(3,420)		(506)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		16,069		18,670
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	12,649	$	18,164

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING PERIOD	$	6,515	$	9,196
RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		9,554		9,474
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD	$	16,069	$	18,670

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	917	$	5,192
RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD		11,732		12,972
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	12,649	$	18,164

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for: Interest	$	13,329	$	11,466
Cash paid during the period for: Taxes	$	189	$	196

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Accrued development costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	7,101	$	7,246
Capitalized amortization of deferred financing costs and warrants	$	2,406	$	2,107
Capitalized stock-based compensation expense	$	130	$	267

																Accumulated
					Additional											Other
	Common Stock				Paid-In		Treasury Stock						Accumulated			Comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Shares			Amount			Deficit			Loss			Total

Balance as of December 31, 2016 (audited)		30,680	$	307	$	87,521		(5,016	)	$	(51,086	)	$	(5,556	)	$	(3,161	)	$	28,025

Net loss available to common stockholders		-		-		-		-			-			(3,909	)		-			(3,909	)
Sale of common stock, net		5,472		55		40,506		-			-			-			-			40,561
Settlement of stock awards		655		6		-		(339	)		(2,580	)		-			-			(2,574	)
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		2,248		-			-			-			-			2,248

Balance as of September 30, 2017 (unaudited)		36,807	$	368	$	130,275		(5,355	)	$	(53,666	)	$	(9,465	)	$	(3,161	)	$	64,351

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017					Year Ended December 31, 2016
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date		Number of Shares			Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date

Balance available, beginning of period		614,500					770,000
Granted to employees		(8,600	)	$	9.13		(105,500	)	$	5.29
Granted to non-employee directors		(18,938	)	$	6.88		(50,000	)	$	9.85
Deferred under non-employee director's deferral program		(5,643	)	$	6.88		-
Balance available, end of period		581,319					614,500

Property Location	Type of Property	Building Size (estimated rentable square feet)		Number of Units		Leased at September 30, 2017			Occupancy at September 30, 2017			Occupancy at September 30, 2016

Owned Locations

New York, New York (77 Greenwich) (1)	Property under development		57,000		-		N/A			N/A			N/A

Paramus, New Jersey (2)	Property under development		77,000		-		-			100.0	%		5.2	%

West Palm Beach, Florida (3)	Retail		112,000		-		68.9	%		68.9	%		67.8	%


Total Owned Square Feet			246,000

Joint Venture

223 North 8th Street, Brooklyn, New York - 50% (4)	Multi-family		65,000		95		94.7	%		94.7	%		-

Grand Total Square Feet			311,000

	Number of Tenants	Leased Square Feet by Year of Expiration		Annualized Rent in Year of Expiration (A)

2017 (B)	2		2,400	$	29
2018	1		4,000		140
2019	-		-		-
2020	8		12,488		245
2021	2		7,063		119
Thereafter	6		55,462		1,121
	19		81,413	$	1,654