UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019

Commission File Number: 000-53650

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

1985 Cedar Bridge Avenue, Suite 1, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (888) 808-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨ Nox

As of November 3, 2017,May 1, 2019, the Registrant had approximately 24.823.4 million shares of common stock outstanding.

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST V, INC.

(FORMERLY BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.)

INDEX

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.                 Financial Statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive IncomeLoss

(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Business

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., which changed its name to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. effective, which was previously named Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. prior to July 20, 2017, (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 9, 2007 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis. In particular, we have focused generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines.  We have acquired a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily.  We have purchased existing, income-producing properties, and newly-constructed properties. We have also invested in other real estate-related investments such as mortgage and mezzanine loans. We intend to hold the various real properties in which we have invested until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met. As of September 30, 2017, we had seven real estate investments, six of which were consolidated through investments in joint ventures.

Substantially all of our business is conducted through Lightstone REIT V OP LP, which was previously named Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II LP prior to November 1, 2017, a limited partnership organized in Delaware (the “Operating Partnership”).  As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owned a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner.  As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BHO Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust, was the sole limited partner of the Operating Partnership and owned the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership.

Our business has beenis managed by an external advisor since the commencement of our initial public offering, and we have no employees. From January 4, 2008 throughEffective February 10, 2017, an affiliate of Stratera Services, LLC, formerly known as “Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC” (“Behringer”), acted as our external advisor (the “Behringer Advisor”). On February 10, 2017, we terminated our engagement of the Behringer Advisor and engaged affiliates of the Lightstone Group (“Lightstone”), LSG-BH II Advisor LLC and LSG Development Advisor LLC (collectively, the “Advisor”), to provide advisory services to us. TheSubject to the oversight of our board of directors, our external advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for services related to the management of our assets.

Organization

In connection with our initial capitalization, we issued 22.5 thousand shares of our common stock and 1.0 thousand shares of our convertible stock to Behringerour previous advisor on January 19, 2007.  Behringer transferred itsThese shares of convertible stock to one of its affiliates on April 2, 2010. Behringerwere transferred its shares of convertible stock to an affiliate of Lightstone on February 10, 2017. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, we had 24.823.4 million shares of common stock outstanding and 1.0 thousand shares of convertible stock outstanding. The outstanding convertible stock is held by an affiliate of Lightstone.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Our commonThe Company’s stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange. The timingCompany may seek to list its stock for trading on a national securities exchange only if a majority of its independent directors believe listing would be in the best interest of its stockholders. The Company does not intend to list its shares at this time. The Company does not anticipate that there would be any market for its shares of common stock until they are listed for trading.

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.   If a liquidity eventproperty reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interests which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage. In certain instances, our joint venture agreements provide for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. We previously targeted the commencement of a liquidity event within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 2023liquidating distributions based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders. However, we can provide no assurances as to the actual timing of the commencement of a liquidity event for our stockholders or the ultimate liquidation of the Company. We will seek stockholder approval prior to liquidating our entire portfolio.achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).

Interim Unaudited Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 16, 2017.April 1, 2019.  The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) and accruals necessary in the judgment of management for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 included herein has been derived from the consolidated balance sheet included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

The preparation of financial statementsNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimatesthousands, except per share/unit data and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the valuation of real estate, depreciable lives, and revenue recognition. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.where indicated in millions)

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. In addition, interests in entities acquired are evaluated based on applicable GAAP, and entities deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary are also consolidated. If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity is evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control, substantive participating rights or both under the respective ownership agreement. For entities in which we have less than a controlling interest or entities which we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we account for the investment using the equity method of accounting.

There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity. Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility, and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses. A change in the judgments, assumptions, and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Real Estate

Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated investments in real estate assets and intangibles were as follows:

We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, and in-place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases.  In no event does the amortization period for intangible assets or liabilities exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.  Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the acquired lease intangibles related to that tenant would be charged to expense.

Real Estate Held for Sale

We classify properties as held for sale when certain criteria are met in accordance with GAAP.  At that time, we present the assets and obligations of the property held for sale separately in our consolidated balance sheet and we cease recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that property.  Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell.  We did not have any real estate assets classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Restricted Cash

As required by our lenders, restricted cash is held in escrow accounts for anticipated capital expenditures, real estate taxes, and other reserves for our consolidated properties. Capital reserves are typically utilized for non-operating expenses such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and major capital expenditures. Alternatively, a lender may require its own formula for an escrow of capital reserves. Restricted cash may also include certain funds temporarily placed in escrows with qualified intermediaries in order to facilitate potential like-kind exchange transactions in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

We early adopted the new Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on December 31, 2016, which changed the presentation of our statements of cash flows and related disclosures for all periods presented and accordingly, the following is a summary of our cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash total as presented in our statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:

Investment Impairment

For all of our real estate and real estate-related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable.  Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to: a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers; and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions.  To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at those properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset.  These projected cash flows are prepared internally by the Advisor and reflect in-place and projected leasing activity, market revenue and expense growth rates, market capitalization rates, discount rates, and changes in economic and other relevant conditions. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer review these projected cash flows to assure that the valuation is prepared using reasonable inputs and assumptions that are consistent with market data or with assumptions that would be used by a third-party market participant and assume the highest and best use of the investment. We consider trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.  While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.

In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties.  A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements. In addition, we may incur impairment charges on assets classified as held for sale in the future if the carrying amount of the asset upon classification as held for sale exceeds the estimated fair value, less costs to sell.

We also evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at each reporting date.  If we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations.  We assess potential impairment by comparing our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated by the joint venture over the life of the joint venture’s assets to the carrying amount of the joint venture.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the joint venture to its estimated fair value.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets and our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is currently recoverable.  There were no impairment charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  However, if market conditions worsen unexpectedly or if changes in our strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take charges in future periods for impairments related to our existing investments.  Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

We provide funding to third-party developers for the acquisition, development, and construction of real estate (“ADC Arrangement”).  Under an ADC Arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property.  We evaluate this arrangement to determine if it2018 included herein has characteristics similar to a loan or if the characteristics are more similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner.  When we determine that the characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting. The ADC Arrangement is reassessed at each reporting period. See Note 8, Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture, for further discussion.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental revenue generated from leases of our operating properties on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including the effect of rent holidays, if any. Leases associated with our multifamily, student housing, and hotel assets are generally short-term in nature, and thus have no straight-line rent.

Hotel revenue isbeen derived from the operations ofconsolidated balance sheet included in the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel and consists primarily of guest room, food and beverage, and other ancillary revenues such as laundry and parking. Hotel revenue is recognized as the services are rendered.Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $1.9 million and $1.4 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and included straight-line rental revenue receivables of $0.4 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was insignificant as of both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated according to the Company’s capitalization policy, which uses the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of five to seven years.  Furniture, fixtures, and equipment associated with properties classified as held for sale are not depreciated. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.  Accumulated depreciation associated with our furniture, fixtures, and equipment was $5.0 million and $9.9 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred financing fees are recorded at cost, accounted for as a reduction to notes payable, and are amortized to interest expense using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt. Deferred financing fees, net were $0.5 million and $0.8 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and have qualified as a REIT since the year ended December 31, 2008.  To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level.  We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code and intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. Taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income and margin taxes. We currently have no taxable income associated with a TRS. Our operating partnerships are flow-through entities and are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity level.

During 2015, we recorded an aggregate provision for income tax of approximately $2.7 million representing estimated foreign income tax due as a result of the sale of two foreign investments, Alte Jakobstraße (“AJS”) and Holstenplatz.  During the third quarter of 2016, we recorded an income tax benefit of less than $0.1 million representing the difference in the actual taxes due and the originally estimated taxes payable on the sale of Holstenplatz.  During the third quarter of 2017, we recorded an aggregate income tax benefit of approximately $1.6 million consisting of (i) a refund of foreign income tax of approximately $0.8 million and (ii) the reversal of our previously estimated taxes payable on these sales of $0.8 million.

We have reviewed our tax positions under GAAP guidance that clarify the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. A tax position may only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination. We believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions taken relative to our federal tax status as a REIT will be sustained in any tax examination.

Foreign Currency Translation

For our international investments where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates, while the statement of operations amounts are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective period. Gains and losses resulting from the change in exchange rates from period to period are reported separately as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in theunaudited consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Upon the substantial liquidationfor interim periods are not necessarily indicative of our investment in a foreign entity, the cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) balance is required to be released into earnings. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-05, upon disposal of the property, we recognize the CTA as an adjustment to the resulting gain or loss on sale.

The Euro was the functional currencyresults for the operations of AJS and Holstenplatz, which were both sold in 2015. As a result of the sale of AJS and Holstenplatz, we no longer have foreign operations. However, we still maintain a Euro-denominated bank account that is comprised primarily of the remaining undistributed proceeds from the sale of these properties, which we translate into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each reportingfull year or any other period. As of September 30, 2017, we maintained approximately $5.2 million in Euro-denominated accounts. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of less than $0.1 million.

Concentration of Credit RiskReclassifications 

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels.  WeCertain prior period amounts have diversified our cash and cash equivalents among several banking institutions in an attemptbeen reclassified to minimize exposureconform to any one of these entities.  We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Geographic and Asset Type Concentration

Our investments may at times be concentrated in certain asset types that are subject to higher risk of foreclosure, or secured by assets concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, 42% and 16% of our total revenues were derived from our properties located in Hawaii and Florida, respectively. Additionally, 42%, 31%, and 21% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were from our hotel, multifamily, and student housing investments, respectively. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic regions or types of assets, downturns relating generally to such region or type of asset may result in defaults on a number of our investments within a short time period, which may reduce our net income and the value of our common stock and accordingly limit our ability to fund our operations. The Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, our only hotel and sole property located in Hawaii, was sold on August 15, 2017. See Note 7 for additional information.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.   If a property reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interest which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage. In certain instances, our joint venture agreement provides for liquidating distributions based on achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).current year presentation.

Earnings per Share

The Company had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented. Accordingly, earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period.

NewRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements to be Adopted

In May 2014,February 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an updateAccounting Standards Update (“ASU 2014-09”ASU”) that amends the existing lease accounting guidance and requires lessees to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 outlinesrecognize a single comprehensive modellease liability and a right-of-use asset for entitiesall leases on their balance sheets. Lessees of operating leases will continue to userecognize lease expense in a manner similar to current accounting. For lessors, accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most ofleases under the existing revenue recognition guidance.  The new guidance will require companies to apply a five-step model in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers, as well as enhance disclosures regarding revenue recognition. Lease contracts will be excluded from this revenue recognition criteria; however, the sale of real estate will be required to follow the new model.  ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption is permitted. The Company is continuing to evaluate the standard; however, we do not expect its adoption to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements, as substantially all revenues consist of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from the standard.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the FASB issued subsequent updates to ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-10”) to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. In May 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-12”) to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvement and Practical Expedients.  The amendments in these updates did not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606; rather, they added improvements to reduce the diversity in practice at initial application and the cost and complexity of applying Topic 606 both at transition and an ongoing basis. The areas affected include: assessing the collectability criteria; presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from customers; noncash consideration; contract modification and completed contracts at transition; and technical correction as it relates to retrospective application and disclosure.  The new guidance is substantially the same as in prior periods, but eliminates current real estate- specific provisions and changes the treatment of initial direct costs. The standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 20182019.

The Company elected the following package of practical expedients provided by the standard: (i) an entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contract is a lease or contains a lease, (ii) an entity need not reassess the lease classification of any expired or existing leases, and allows full(iii) an entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company also elected the short-term lease exception provided for in the standard and therefore will only recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases with a term greater than one year.

The Company did not recognize any right-of-use assets or modified retrospective application.  We do not expect thelease liabilities upon adoption of the standard. The Company does not have any material leases such as ground leases or building leases or any material leases with a term greater than one year. From time to time the Company will enter into immaterial leases for office equipment such as copiers.  The resulting right-of-use assets or lease liabilities would be immaterial in the aggregate and are recognized in the period they are incurred as lease expense.

The ASU 2016-10provides a practical expedient which allows lessors to not separate lease and non-lease components in a contract and allocate the consideration in the contract to the separate components if both: (i) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition for the non-lease component and the related lease component are the same and (ii) the combined single lease component would be classified as an operating lease. The Company elected the practical expedient to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component in lease contracts where we are the lessor. The ASU 2016-12also provides a transition option that permits entities to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements; however, we will continuenot recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to evaluate this assessment until the guidance becomes effective.standard, which the Company also elected.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

In February 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-02”) to ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 supersedes the existing lease accounting model, and modifies both lessee and lessor accounting. The new guidance will require lessees to recognizeadoption of this standard did not have a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset, initially measured at the present value of lease payments, for both operating and financing leases, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statement of earnings. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, lessees will be permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset to not recognize lease liabilities and lease assets. Under this new pronouncement, lessor accounting will be largely unchanged from existing GAAP. The new standard will be effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will havematerial effect on our consolidated financial statements when adopted.position or our results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-13”) to ASC Topic 326, Credit Losses. This amendednew guidance requires measurement and recognition ofwhich replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology currently in use with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable forecasts. This is different from the current guidance as this will require immediate recognition of estimatedinformation to inform credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of many financial assets. Financial assets that are measured at amortized cost will be required to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected with an allowance for credit losses deducted from the amortized cost basis. Generally, the pronouncement requires a modified retrospective method of adoption. Thisloss estimates.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements when adopted.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-01”) to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The guidance clarifies the definition of a business and assists in the evaluation of whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or as a business combination. The guidance provides a test to determine when a set of assets and activities acquired is not a business. When substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. Under the updated guidance, an acquisition of a single property will likely be treated as an asset acquisition as opposed to a business combination and associated transaction costs will be capitalized rather than expensed as incurred. Additionally, assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest will be measured at their relative fair values. This guidance is effective for fiscal years andincluding interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including for interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. Uponfiscal years.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance, we anticipate future acquisitionsstandard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company has reviewed and determined that other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of real estate assets, if any, will likely qualify as an asset acquisition. Therefore, any future transaction costs associated with an asset acquisition will be capitalizedoperations and accounted for in accordance with the guidance in ASU 2017-01.cash flows, or do not apply to its current operations.

Fair value measurements areOn February 14, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 384-unit multifamily property located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (the “Valley Ranch Apartments”) from an unrelated third party, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $70.3 million, excluding closing and other related transaction costs. In connection with the acquisition, our Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $1.3 million in acquisition fees and acquisition expense reimbursements.

In connection with the acquisition of the Valley Ranch Apartments, the Company simultaneously entered into a $43.4 million nonrecourse mortgage loan (the “Valley Ranch Apartments Loan”) collateralized by the Valley Ranch Apartments (See Note 7).

The Company determined this acquisition was an asset acquisition and allocated the total purchase price, including acquisition fees and expenses, to the assets acquired based on their relative fair value. Approximately $24.1 million was allocated to land and improvements, $46.3 million was allocated to building and improvements, and $1.1 million was allocated to in-place lease intangibles.

The capitalization rate for the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independentacquisition of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2Valley Ranch Apartments was approximately 5.35%. The Company calculates the capitalization rate for a real property by dividing the net operating income (“NOI”) of the hierarchy)property by the purchase price of the property, excluding costs. For purposes of this calculation, NOI was based upon the year ended November 30, 2018. Additionally, NOI is all gross revenues from the property less all operating expenses, including property taxes and management fees but excluding depreciation.

500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan

On February 28, 2019, the Company entered into a $12.0 million Mezzanine Loan Promissory Note (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan”) with an unaffiliated third party (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower”). On the same date, the Company funded $8.0 million of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan is recorded in note receivable, net on the consolidated balance sheet. In connection with the funding of $8.0 million of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan, our Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $0.1 million in acquisition fees from the Company. The acquisition fee is accounted for as adirect deduction from the carrying value of the500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loanand is being amortized over the initial term of the500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan and amortized to interest expense using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method.

The 500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan, is due August 31, 2021 and is collateralized by the ownership interests of the 500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower owns a parcel of land located at 500 West 22^nd Street, New York, New York. The 500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR + 11.0% per annum with a floor of 13.493% (13.493% as of March 31, 2019). The Company received an origination fee of 1.0% of the loan balance, or approximately $0.1 million, which ispresented in the consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loanand will be amortized,to interest income using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method,over the initial term of the500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. The 500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan may be extended two additional six- month periods by the 500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower provided certain conditions are met, including the establishment of an additional reserve for interest and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3payment of an extension fee equal to 0.25% of the hierarchy) has been established.outstanding loan balance.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that we have the ability to access.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.  In instances where the determinationUpon funding of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loan, the Company retained approximately $2.1 million of the fair value hierarchy, the levelproceeds to establish a reserve for interest and other items, which ispresented in the fairconsolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying value hierarchy within whichof the fair value measurement falls500 West 22^nd Street Mezzanine Loanand will beapplied against the first 8.0% of monthly interest due during the initial term of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. The additional monthly interest due is based on the lowest level input that is significantadded to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  Our assessmentbalance of the significance500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan and payable at maturity.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company recorded $0.1 million of a particular inputinterest income related to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgmentnote receivable and considers factors specific toas of March 31, 2019, the asset or liability.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

We may use interest rate swaps and caps to manage our interest rate risk.  The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.  This analysis reflects the contractual termsbalance of the derivatives, including500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan was $8.0 million and the period to maturity,remaining reserves for interest and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, implied volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.

As of September 30, 2017, we have no derivative financial instruments.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

There were no impairment charges recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.other items aggregated $2.0 million.

We determined the following disclosure of estimated fair values using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the related estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or only estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

As of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, management estimated that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, payables/receivables fromaccrued property tax and payables to related parties and distributions payable to noncontrolling interests were at amounts that reasonably approximated their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and short-term maturities. The carrying amount of the note receivable approximates fair value because the interest rate is variable and reflective of the market rate. The fair value of the notes payable is categorized as a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation on the borrowing rates currently available for loans with similar terms and maturities. The fair value of the notes payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate. Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016.

2018. Carrying amounts of our notes payable and the related estimated fair value as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 areis summarized as follows:

As of September 30, 2017, we consolidated six real estate assets in our consolidated balance sheet. The following table presents certain information about our consolidated investments as of September 30, 2017:

Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel

On June 19, 2017, we, through our indirect 80%-owned subsidiaries, Kauai Coconut Beach, LLC and Kauai Coconut Beach Operator, LLC, (collectively, the “Sellers”) entered into an agreement (the “Courtyard Kauai Agreement”) to sell the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, a 311-room hotel located in Kapaa, Hawaii, to KHS, LLC, (the “Buyer”) an unaffiliated third party, for a contractual sales price of $62.0 million.

On August 15, 2017, the Sellers completed the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel to the Buyer for $62.0 million pursuant to the terms of the Courtyard Kauai Agreement.  In connection with the transaction, the Buyer assumed the existing outstanding mortgage indebtedness of $36.0 million secured by the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The net proceeds from the disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel were approximately $24.1 million, after the payment of closing costs, expenses, pro rations and other working capital adjustments and a payment of a payment of approximately $1.7 million to the minority owner of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. In connection with the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, we recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $20.9 million on our consolidated statements of operations during the third quarter of 2017.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

In connection with the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, certain funds were placed in escrow with a qualified intermediary in order to facilitate potential like-kind exchange transactions in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The balance of the escrow account was approximately $27.0 million as of September 30, 2017 and is included in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.

The disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since the disposition did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through its respective date of disposition.

We provided mezzanine financing totaling $15.3 million to an unaffiliated third-party entity (the “Borrower”) that owns an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado (the “Huron”).  The Borrower also has a senior construction loan with a third-party construction lender (the “Senior Lender”) in an aggregate original principal amount of $40 million.  The senior construction loan is guaranteed by the owners of the developer.  We also have a personal guaranty from the owners of the developer guaranteeing completion of the project and payment of cost overruns. Our mezzanine loan is secured by all of the membership interests of the Borrower and is subordinate to the senior construction loan. Our advances of $15.3 million initially had annual stated interest rates ranging from 10% to 18%. We evaluated this ADC Arrangement and determined that the characteristics are similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership. Accordingly, the investment is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting since we will participate in the residual interests through the sale or refinancing of the property. 

Both the senior loan and our mezzanine loan were in technical default at December 31, 2016 due to a delay in completion of the project. The project was subsequently completed in January 2017. On March 23, 2017, the Senior Lender executed a loan amendment extending the maturity date of the loan to March 24, 2018. The Senior Lender loan amendment also increased the interest rate 75 basis points to 30-day LIBOR plus 375 basis points and added provisions to require the maintenance of certain prescribed minimum occupancy and rental rates at future dates. On May 8, 2017, we amended the mezzanine loan agreement to mirror the maturity date of the senior loan and changed our interest rate to 11% for the entire balance of the loan. The amended mezzanine loan agreement was effective as of March 1, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance under the mezzanine loan was $15.3 million. The Borrower funded all cost overruns.

We considered the impact of these events on our accounting treatment and determined the ADC Arrangement should still continue to be accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting. We will continue to monitor this situation and assess any impact these or future events might have on our ability to ultimately realize the carrying value of our investment. The ADC Arrangement is reassessed at each reporting period.

In connection with our investment in the Huron, we capitalized interest of $176 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. There was no interest capitalized on our investment in the Huron during the three months ended September 30, 2016 or during the 2017 periods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we recorded no equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint venture related to our investment in the Huron. The Company’s maximum exposure to losses associated with its unconsolidated joint venture is limited to its carrying value in this investment.

The following table sets forth our ownership interest in the Huron:

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Summarized balance sheet information for the unconsolidated joint venture as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, shown at 100%, is as follows:

Summarized statement of operations information for the unconsolidated joint venture for the periods indicated, shown at 100%, is as follows:

Effective January 1, 2016, we adopted the guidance in ASU 2015-02. As a result, the Operating Partnership (see Note 1) and each of our less than wholly-owned real estate partnerships (22 Exchange, LLC, Gardens Medical Pavilion, LLC, SL Parkside Apartments, LLC, and the ADC Arrangement associated with the Huron) have been deemed to have the characteristics of a VIE. However, we were not required to consolidate any previously unconsolidated entities or deconsolidate any previously consolidated entities as a result of the change in classification. Accordingly, there has been no change to the amounts reported in our consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows or amounts recognized in our consolidated statements of operations.

Consolidated VIEs

The Company consolidates the Operating Partnership, 22 Exchange, LLC, Gardens Medical Pavilion, LLC through BH-AW-Florida MOB Venture, LLC, and SL Parkside Apartments, LLC, which are variable interest entities, or VIEs, for which we are the primary beneficiary. Generally, a VIE is a legal entity in which the equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or the equity investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. A limited partnership, or legal entities such as an LLC, are considered a VIE when the majority of the limited partners unrelated to the general partner possess neither the right to remove the general partner without cause, nor certain rights to participate in the decisions that most significantly affect the financial results of the partnership. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we consider qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and which party controls such activities; the amount and characteristics of our investment; the obligation or likelihood for us or other investors to provide financial support; and the similarity with and significance to our business activities and the business activities of the other investors. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.

Unconsolidated VIEs

Included in the Company’s joint venture investments as of September 30, 2017 is the ADC Arrangement associated with the Huron, which is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture and is a VIE. Refer to Note 8 for further details on the ADC Arrangement. This arrangement was established to provide mezzanine financing to an unaffiliated third party that owns the Huron, an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado. Based on our reevaluation under ASU 2015-02, we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of this VIE based on the rights of the general partner. The arrangement does not allow for substantive kick-out rights over the general partner and we do not have the power to direct the activities of the Huron that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance. Accordingly, we have determined it is appropriate, consistent with past accounting, that the Huron ADC Arrangement will continue to be accounted for under the equity method.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

The following table sets forth information on our notes payable as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

(1) Includes approximately $0.1 million of unamortized premium related to debt we assumed at acquisition.

As of September 30, 2017, our outstanding notes payable were $102.9 million, net of deferred financing fees of $0.5 million, and had a weighted-average interest rate of 5.0%. For loans in place as of September 30, 2017, we have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the unaffiliated lenders with respect to the 22 Exchange and Parkside notes payable.

We are subject to various customary financial covenants, including, maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios, loan to value ratios and liquidity. We did not meet the debt service coverage requirements for our 22 Exchange loan as of March 31, 2017, June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2017. As a result, we expect the lender to begin sweeping the cash from operations; however, the loan is not in default.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had debt of approximately $12.6 million associated with Gardens Medical Pavilion, approximately $23.6 million associated with River Club and Townhomes at River Club, and $9.8 million associated with Parkside maturing in the next twelve months.

If we do not dispose of Gardens Medical Pavilion, River Club and Townhomes at River Club or Parkside by their maturity dates, we expect to repay the outstanding balances with available cash or refinance all or a portion of the balances outstanding.Marketable Securities

The following table summarizes our contractual obligationsis a summary of the Company’s available for sale securities as of the dates indicated:

When evaluating the investments for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company reviews factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer and any changes thereto, and the Company’s intent to sell, or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell, the investment before recovery of the investment’s amortized cost basis. As of March 31, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairment charges.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal payments,or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on initial scheduled maturity datesthree levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and doesthe last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value:

The fair values of the Company’s investments in debt securities are measured using quoted prices for these investments; however, the markets for these assets are not active. As of March 31, 2019, all of the Company’s debt securities were classified as of September 30, 2017:Level 2 assets and there were no transfers between the level classifications during the three months ended March 31, 2019.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of our investments in marketable debt securities with stated contractual maturity dates, accounted for as available-for-sale securities and classified by the contractual maturity date of the securities:

Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel Debt