UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019

 

Commission File Number: 000-53650

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Maryland 20-8198863
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

1985 Cedar Bridge Avenue, Suite 1, Lakewood, New Jersey 08701

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (888) 808-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yesx No¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yesx No¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filerx (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨x
 Emerging growth company¨

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨ Nox

 

As of November 3, 2017,August 10, 2019, the Registrant had approximately 24.822.8 million shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST V, INC.

(FORMERLY BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.)INDEX

 

INDEX

 

  Page
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION 
   
Item 1.Financial Statements  (Unaudited) 
   
 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017 (Unaudited)2019 and December 31, 201620183
   
 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)Loss for the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 201620184
   
 Consolidated StatementStatements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the NineThree and Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20185
   
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 201620186
   
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements7
   
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations25
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk3817
   
Item 4.Controls and Procedures3930
   
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION 
   
Item 1.Legal Proceedings40
Item 1a.Risk Factors4031
   
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds4031
   
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities4132
   
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures4132
   
Item 5.Other Information4132
   
Item 6.Exhibits4132

 

 2 

 

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements.

 

Item 1.                 Financial Statements.

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018 
 (Unaudited)     (unaudited)    
Assets                
Real estate        
Land and improvements, net $30,388  $42,710 
Building and improvements, net  102,849   132,359 
Total real estate  133,237   175,069 
Investment property:        
Land and improvements $70,482  $46,175 
Building and improvements  243,418   194,726 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment  6,652   6,285 
Gross investment property  320,552   247,186 
Less accumulated depreciation  (51,645)  (46,182)
Net investment property  268,907   201,004 
                
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture  -   10,944 
Cash and cash equivalents  53,228   67,111   38,568   29,607 
Marketable securities, available for sale  5,383   14,386 
Restricted cash  34,679   6,101   4,309   3,045 
Accounts receivable, net  1,935   1,415 
Note receivable, net  7,356   - 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  420   1,051   3,308   5,471 
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture  14,658   14,658 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net  1,259   3,148 
Lease intangibles, net  285   352 
Total Assets $239,701  $268,905  $327,831  $264,457 
                
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity                
Notes payable, net $102,902  $142,332  $209,677  $139,016 
Accounts payable  240   491 
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities  3,587   3,634 
Payables to related parties  70   370   15   316 
Acquired below-market leases, net  55   65 
Distributions payable to noncontrolling interest  18   21 
Income taxes payable  51   38 
Deferred gain  558   1,247 
Accrued property tax  2,338   1,385   2,607   1,670 
Accrued and other liabilities  3,885   4,317 
Total liabilities  110,117   150,266   215,886   144,636 
                
Commitments and Contingencies        
        
Stockholders' Equity:                
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding        
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share; 50.0 million shares authorized, none issued and outstanding  -   - 
Convertible stock, $.0001 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding  -   -   -   - 
Common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 350,000,000 shares authorized, 24,757,612 and 25,218,770 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  3   3 
Common stock, $.0001 par value per share; 350.0 million shares authorized, 22.8 million and 23.4 million shares issued and outstanding, respectively  2   2 
Additional paid-in-capital  225,505   227,891   209,670   214,537 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  4   (495)
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)  27   (217)
Accumulated deficit  (100,954)  (114,666)  (98,403)  (95,295)
Total Company stockholders' equity  124,558   112,733   111,296   119,027 
       ��
Noncontrolling interest  5,026   5,906 
Noncontrolling interests  649   794 
                
Total Stockholder's Equity  129,584   118,639   111,945   119,821 
                
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $239,701  $268,905  $327,831  $264,457 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 3 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive IncomeLoss

(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

  For the Three Months Ended September 30,  For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Revenues                
Rental revenues $6,122  $6,740  $18,345  $21,590 
Hotel revenues  2,653   4,653   13,207   13,946 
Total revenues  8,775   11,393   31,552   35,536 
Expenses                
Property operating expenses  2,697   2,635   6,758   7,128 
Hotel operating expenses  1,921   3,509   9,167   10,219 
Interest expense, net  1,601   1,561   4,843   4,692 
Real estate taxes  1,090   1,197   3,315   4,113 
Property management fees  285   374   1,043   1,164 
Asset management fees  426   554   1,445   1,773 
General and administrative  863   705   2,624   2,246 
Depreciation and amortization  2,353   2,616   7,499   8,396 
Total expenses  11,236   13,151   36,694   39,731 
Interest income, net  73   39   200   72 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt  -   (500)  -   (500)
Other (expense) income  (3)  52   -   263 
Loss before gain on sale of real estate and income taxes  (2,391)  (2,167)  (4,942)  (4,360)
Gain on sale of real estate and other assets, net  21,336   11,462   21,619   11,462 
Income tax benefit  1,592   29   1,592   29 
Net income  20,537   9,324   18,269   7,131 
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest  (4,430)  59   (4,557)  14 
Net income attributable to the Company's shares $16,107  $9,383  $13,712  $7,145 
Weighted average shares outstanding:                
Basic and diluted  24,899   25,391   25,031   25,470 
Basic and diluted earnings per share $0.65  $0.37  $0.55  $0.28 
Comprehensive income:                
Net income $20,537  $9,324  $18,269  $7,131 
Other comprehensive income:                
Foreign currency translation gain  212   37   499   106 
Total other comprehensive income  212   37   499   106 
Comprehensive income:  20,749   9,361   18,768   7,237 
Comprehensive (income) loss  attributable to noncontrolling interest  (4,430)  59   (4,557)  14 
Comprehensive income attributable to the Company's shares $16,319  $9,420  $14,211  $7,251 
  For the Three Months Ended June 30,  For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2019  2018  2019  2018 
             
Rental revenues $9,511  $6,713  $18,044  $13,312 
                 
Expenses                
Property operating expenses  3,083   2,506   5,872   5,097 
Real estate taxes  1,242   1,107   2,432   2,205 
General and administrative  1,661   1,367   3,144   2,812 
Depreciation and amortization  3,349   2,389   6,449   4,818 
Total operating expenses  9,335   7,369   17,897   14,932 
                 
Operating income/(loss)  176   (656)  147   (1,620)
                 
Interest expense, net  (2,272)  (1,362)  (4,259)  (2,686)
Interest income  415   181   660   314 
Gain on sale of real estate and other assets  -   60   -   307 
Other income, net  263   87   328   190 
Net loss  (1,418)  (1,690)  (3,124)  (3,495)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  3   117   16   90 
Net loss attributable to the Company's shares $(1,415) $(1,573) $(3,108) $(3,405)
Weighted average shares outstanding:                
Basic and diluted  23,219   24,515   23,286   24,561 
Basic and diluted loss per share $(0.06) $(0.06) $(0.13) $(0.14)
Comprehensive loss:                
Net loss $(1,418) $(1,690) $(3,124) $(3,495)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):                
Holding gain/(loss) on marketable securities, available for sale  57   (40)  225   (179)
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net loss  2   -   54   - 
Foreign currency translation (loss)/gain  (35)  (21)  (35)  1 
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)  24   (61)  244   (178)
Comprehensive loss:  (1,394)  (1,751)  (2,880)  (3,673)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest  3   117   16   90 
Comprehensive loss attributable to the Company's shares $(1,391) $(1,634) $(2,864) $(3,583)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 4 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated StatementStatements of Stockholders’ Equity

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

  Convertible Stock  Common Stock     Accumulated          
              Additional  Other        Total 
              Paid-In  Comprehensive  Accumulated  Noncontrolling  Stockholders' 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Deficit  Interests  Equity 
                            
BALANCE, December 31, 2016  1  $-   25,219  $3  $227,891  $(495) $(114,666) $5,906  $118,639 
                                     
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   -   13,712   4,557   18,269 
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders  -   -   -   -   -   -       30   30 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (5,467)  (5,467)
Redemption and cancellation of shares  -   -   (461)  -   (2,386)  -   -   -   (2,386)
Foreign currency translation gain  -   -   -   -   -   499   -   -   499 
                                     
BALANCE, September 30, 2017  1  $-   24,758  $3  $225,505  $4  $(100,954) $5,026  $129,584 

  Convertible Stock  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-In
  Accumulated Other   Accumulated  Noncontrolling  Total
Stockholders'
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Comprehensive Loss  Deficit  Interests  Equity 
                            
BALANCE, December 31, 2017  1  $-   24,647  $2  $224,923  $(27) $(90,108) $4,845  $139,635 
                                     
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,405)  (90)  (3,495)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,412)  (3,412)
Redemption and cancellation of shares  -   -   (158)  -   (826)  -   -   -   (826)
Other comprehensive loss:                                    
Holding loss on marketable securities, available for sale  -   -   -   -   -   (179)  -   -   (179)
Foreign currency translation gain  -   -   -   -   -   1   -   -   1 
                                     
BALANCE, June 30, 2018  1  $-   24,489  $2  $224,097  $(205) $(93,513) $1,343  $131,724 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

  Convertible Stock  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-In
  Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
  Accumulated  Noncontrolling  Total
Stockholders'
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  (Loss)/Income  Deficit  Interests  Equity 
                            
BALANCE, March 31, 2018  1  $-   24,536  $2  $224,347  $(144) $(91,940) $4,736  $137,001 
                                     
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,573)  (117)  (1,690)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,276)  (3,276)
Redemption and cancellation of shares  -   -   (47)  -   (250)  -   -   -   (250)
Other comprehensive loss:                                    
Holding loss on marketable securities, available for sale  -   -   -   -   -   (40)  -   -   (40)
Foreign currency translation loss  -   -   -   -   -   (21)  -   -   (21)
                                     
BALANCE, June 30, 2018  1  $-   24,489  $2  $224,097  $(205) $(93,513) $1,343  $131,724 

 

5
  Convertible Stock  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-In
  Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
  Accumulated  Noncontrolling  Total
Stockholders'
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  (Loss)/Income  Deficit  Interests  Equity 
                            
BALANCE, December 31, 2018  1  $-   23,432  $2  $214,537  $(217) $(95,295) $794  $119,821 
                                     
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,108)  (16)  (3,124)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (162)  (162)
Redemption and cancellation of shares  -   -   (621)  -   (4,867)  -   -   -   (4,867)
Contributions received from noncontrolling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   33   33 
Other comprehensive income:                                    
Holding gain on marketable securities, available for sale  -   -   -   -   -   225   -   -   225 
Foreign currency translation loss  -   -   -   -   -   (35)  -   -   (35)
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net loss  -   -   -   -   -   54   -   -   54 
                                   - 
BALANCE, June 30, 2019  1  $-   22,811  $2  $209,670  $27  $(98,403) $649  $111,945 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

  For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net income $18,269  $7,131 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  7,499   8,396 
Amortization of deferred financing fees  420   394 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt  -   500 
Loss on derivatives  -   2 
Gain on sale of real estate  (21,619)  (11,462)
Mark to market adjustment on derivative financial instruments  (126)  (168)
Other non-cash adjustments  173   (65)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets  443   (137)
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable  (696)  890 
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable, accrued property tax and accrued and other liabilities  498   (1,232)
Decrease in due to related parties  (300)  (123)
         
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,561   4,126 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture  -   (176)
Net proceeds from sale of real estate and other assets  24,060   68,520 
Additions of real estate and furniture, fixtures, and equipment  (1,533)  (2,062)
         
Net cash provided by investing activities  22,527   66,282 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Financing costs  (1,465)  (135)
Proceeds from notes payable  36,000   - 
Payments on notes payable  (39,601)  (34,880)
Redemptions of common stock  (2,386)  (1,166)
Distributions paid on common stock  -   (38,378)
Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders  30   92 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders  (5,470)  (813)
         
Net cash used in financing activities  (12,892)  (75,280)
         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash  499   157 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash  14,695   (4,715)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year  73,212   81,396 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $87,907  $76,681 
         
Supplemental cash flow information for the periods indicated is as follows:        
         
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $5,000  $4,484 
Income taxes paid, net $-  $175 
Debt assumed by buyer in connection with disposition of investment property $(36,000) $- 
Capital expenditures for real estate in accrued liabilities $47  $139 
Accrued distributions to noncontrolling interest $18  $21 
  Convertible Stock  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-In
  Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
  Accumulated  Noncontrolling  Total
Stockholders'
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  (Loss)/Income  Deficit  Interests  Equity 
                            
BALANCE, March 31, 2019  1  $-   23,432  $2  $214,537  $3  $(96,988) $745  $118,299 
                                     
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,415)  (3)  (1,418)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (126)  (126)
Redemption and cancellation of shares  -   -   (621)  -   (4,867)  -   -   -   (4,867)
Contributions received from noncontrolling interests  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   33   33 
Other comprehensive income:                                    
Holding gain on marketable securities, available for sale  -   -   -   -   -   57   -   -   57 
Foreign currency translation loss  -   -   -   -   -   (35)  -   -   (35)
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net loss  -   -   -   -   -   2   -   -   2 
                                     
BALANCE, June 30, 2019  1  $-   22,811  $2  $209,670  $27  $(98,403) $649  $111,945 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 65 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II,dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

  For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2019  2018 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(3,124) $(3,495)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  6,449   4,818 
Amortization of deferred financing fees  289   155 
Non-cash interest income  (229)  - 
Other non-cash adjustments  (377)  (309)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets  2,717   (420)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities and accrued property tax  1,049   1,746 
Decrease in payables to related parties  (301)  (33)
Net cash provided by operating activities  6,473   2,462 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchase of investment property  (74,634)  (1,169)
Purchases of marketable securities  (2,222)  (15,392)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities  11,450   375 
Funding of note receivable  (6,969)  - 
Acquisition fee paid on note receivable  (158)  - 
Proceeds from disposition of investment in unconsolidated joint venture  10,944   - 
Cash used in investing activities  (61,589)  (16,186)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from notes payable  72,214   61,374 
Payments on notes payable  (414)  (33,592)
Payment of loan fees and expenses  (1,428)  (1,411)
Redemptions of common stock  (4,867)  (826)
Contributions received from noncontrolling interests  33   - 
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests  (162)  (3,436)
Net cash provided by financing activities  65,376   22,109 
         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash  (35)  1 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash  10,225   8,386 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year  32,652   57,360 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $42,877  $65,746 
         
Supplemental cash flow information for the periods indicated is as follows:        
Cash paid for interest $4,012  $1,803 
Capital expenditures for real estate in accrued liabilities and accounts payable $5  $74 
Accrued distributions payable to noncontrolling interests $-  $3 
Holding gain/loss on marketable securities, available for sale $279  $179 
         
The following is a summary of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash total as presented in our statements of cash flows for the periods presented:        
Cash $38,568  $61,402 
Restricted cash  4,309   4,344 
Total cash and restricted cash $42,877  $65,746 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

1.Business and Organization

 

Business

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., which changed its name to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. effective, which was previously named Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. prior to July 20, 2017, (which may be referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), was organized as a Maryland corporation on January 9, 2007 and has elected to be taxed, and currently qualifies, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

 

We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis. In particular, we have focused generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment, or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who are distressed or face time-sensitive deadlines. We have acquired a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily. We have purchased existing, income-producing properties, and newly-constructed properties. We have also invested in other real estate-related investments such as mortgage and mezzanine loans. We intend to hold the various real properties in which we have invested until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, we had seveneight real estate investments six of which were(four wholly owned properties and four properties consolidated through investments in joint ventures.ventures) and one real estate-related investment (mezzanine loan).

 

Substantially all of our business is conducted through Lightstone REIT V OP LP, which was previously named Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II LP prior to November 1, 2017, a limited partnership organized in Delaware (the “Operating Partnership”).  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, our wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary, BHO II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owned a 0.1% partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, our wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary, BHO Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust, was the sole limited partner of the Operating Partnership and owned the remaining 99.9% interest in the Operating Partnership.

 

Our business has beenis managed by an external advisor since the commencement of our initial public offering, and we have no employees. From January 4, 2008 throughEffective February 10, 2017, an affiliate of Stratera Services, LLC, formerly known as “Behringer Harvard Holdings, LLC” (“Behringer”), acted as our external advisor (the “Behringer Advisor”). On February 10, 2017, we terminated our engagement of the Behringer Advisor and engaged affiliates of the Lightstone Group (“Lightstone”), LSG-BH II Advisor LLC and LSG Development Advisor LLC (collectively, the “Advisor”), to provide advisory services to us. TheSubject to the oversight of our board of directors, our external advisor is responsible for managing our day-to-day affairs and for services related to the management of our assets.

Organization

In connection with our initial capitalization, we issued 22.5 thousand shares of our common stock and 1.0 thousand shares of our convertible stock to Behringerour previous advisor on January 19, 2007.  Behringer transferred itsThese shares of convertible stock to one of its affiliates on April 2, 2010. Behringerwere transferred its shares of convertible stock to an affiliate of Lightstone on February 10, 2017. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, we had 24.822.8 million shares of common stock outstanding and 1.0 thousand shares of convertible stock outstanding. The outstanding convertible stock is held by an affiliate of Lightstone.

7

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange. The timing of a liquidity event for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. We previously targeted the commencement of a liquidity event within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 2023 based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders. However, we can provide no assurances as to the actual timing of the commencement of a liquidity event for our stockholders or the ultimate liquidation of the Company. We will seek stockholder approval prior to liquidating our entire portfolio.

 

Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.   If a property reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interests which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage. In certain instances, our joint venture agreements provide for liquidating distributions based on achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).

7

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

2.Interim Unaudited Financial InformationSummary of Significant Accounting Policies

Interim Unaudited Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 16, 2017.April 1, 2019.  The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) and accruals necessary in the judgment of management for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

 

The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 included herein has been derived from the consolidated balance sheet included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The unaudited consolidated statements of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any other period.

3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The most significant assumptions and estimates relate to the valuation of real estate, depreciable lives, and revenue recognition. Application of these assumptions requires the exercise of judgment as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

 

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries over which we have control. All inter-company transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. In addition, interests in entities acquired are evaluated based on applicable GAAP, and entities deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”) in which we are the primary beneficiary are also consolidated. If the interest in the entity is determined not to be a VIE, then the entity is evaluated for consolidation based on legal form, economic substance, and the extent to which we have control, substantive participating rights or both under the respective ownership agreement. For entities in which we have less than a controlling interest or entities which we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, we account for the investment using the equity method of accounting.

 

There are judgments and estimates involved in determining if an entity in which we have made an investment is a VIE and, if so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. The entity is evaluated to determine if it is a VIE by, among other things, calculating the percentage of equity being risked compared to the total equity of the entity. Determining expected future losses involves assumptions of various possibilities of the results of future operations of the entity, assigning a probability to each possibility, and using a discount rate to determine the net present value of those future losses. A change in the judgments, assumptions, and estimates outlined above could result in consolidating an entity that should not be consolidated or accounting for an investment using the equity method that should in fact be consolidated, the effects of which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

8

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Real Estate

Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to our consolidated investments in real estate assets and intangibles were as follows:

September 30, 2017 Buildings and
Improvements
  Land and
Improvements
  Lease Intangibles  Acquired Below-
Market Leases
 
             
Cost $133,712  $33,549  $1,610  $(137)
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (30,863)  (3,161)  (1,325)  82 
Net $102,849  $30,388  $285  $(55)

December 31, 2016 Buildings and
Improvements
  Land and
Improvements
  Lease Intangibles  Acquired Below-
Market Leases
 
             
Cost $164,087  $45,885  $1,599  $(137)
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (31,728)  (3,175)  (1,247)  72 
Net $132,359  $42,710  $352  $(65)

We amortize the value of in-place leases, in-place tenant improvements, and in-place leasing commissions to expense over the initial term of the respective leases.  In no event does the amortization period for intangible assets or liabilities exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.  Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the acquired lease intangibles related to that tenant would be charged to expense.

Real Estate Held for Sale

We classify properties as held for sale when certain criteria are met in accordance with GAAP.  At that time, we present the assets and obligations of the property held for sale separately in our consolidated balance sheet and we cease recording depreciation and amortization expense related to that property.  Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell.  We did not have any real estate assets classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Restricted Cash

As required by our lenders, restricted cash is held in escrow accounts for anticipated capital expenditures, real estate taxes, and other reserves for our consolidated properties. Capital reserves are typically utilized for non-operating expenses such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and major capital expenditures. Alternatively, a lender may require its own formula for an escrow of capital reserves. Restricted cash may also include certain funds temporarily placed in escrows with qualified intermediaries in order to facilitate potential like-kind exchange transactions in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

9

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

We early adopted the new Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on December 31, 2016, which changed the presentation of our statements of cash flows and related disclosures for all periods presented and accordingly, the following is a summary of our cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash total as presented in our statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:

  September 30, 2016 
Cash and cash equivalents $69,687 
Restricted cash  6,994 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $76,681 

Investment Impairment

For all of our real estate and real estate-related investments, we monitor events and changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets may not be recoverable.  Examples of the types of events and circumstances that would cause management to assess our assets for potential impairment include, but are not limited to: a significant decrease in the market price of an asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used; an accumulation of costs in excess of the acquisition basis plus construction of the property; major vacancies and the resulting loss of revenues; natural disasters; a change in the projected holding period; legitimate purchase offers; and changes in the global and local markets or economic conditions.  To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic locations, downturns specifically related to such regions may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at those properties within a short time period, which may result in asset impairments.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, we assess potential impairment by comparing estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset and from its eventual disposition to the carrying amount of the asset.  These projected cash flows are prepared internally by the Advisor and reflect in-place and projected leasing activity, market revenue and expense growth rates, market capitalization rates, discount rates, and changes in economic and other relevant conditions. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer review these projected cash flows to assure that the valuation is prepared using reasonable inputs and assumptions that are consistent with market data or with assumptions that would be used by a third-party market participant and assume the highest and best use of the investment. We consider trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the asset to estimated fair value.  While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding factors such as market rents, economic conditions, and occupancy rates could significantly affect these estimates.

In evaluating our investments for impairment, management may use appraisals and make estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the projected date of disposition of the properties, the estimated future cash flows of the properties during our ownership, and the projected sales price of each of the properties.  A future change in these estimates and assumptions could result in understating or overstating the carrying value of our investments, which could be material to our financial statements. In addition, we may incur impairment charges on assets classified as held for sale in the future if the carrying amount of the asset upon classification as held for sale exceeds the estimated fair value, less costs to sell.

We also evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures at each reporting date.  If we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value, we will record an impairment charge based on these evaluations.  We assess potential impairment by comparing our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows expected to be generated by the joint venture over the life of the joint venture’s assets to the carrying amount of the joint venture.  In the event that the carrying amount exceeds our portion of estimated future undiscounted operating cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the joint venture to its estimated fair value.

10

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets and our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is currently recoverable.  There were no impairment charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.  However, if market conditions worsen unexpectedly or if changes in our strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value calculations, we may need to take charges in future periods for impairments related to our existing investments.  Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

We provide funding to third-party developers for the acquisition, development, and construction of real estate (“ADC Arrangement”).  Under an ADC Arrangement, we may participate in the residual profits of the project through the sale or refinancing of the property.  We evaluate this arrangement to determine if it2018 included herein has characteristics similar to a loan or if the characteristics are more similar to a joint venture or partnership such as participating in the risks and rewards of the project as an owner or an investment partner.  When we determine that the characteristics are more similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership, we account for the arrangement as an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting or a direct investment (consolidated basis of accounting) instead of applying loan accounting. The ADC Arrangement is reassessed at each reporting period. See Note 8, Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture, for further discussion.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental revenue generated from leases of our operating properties on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including the effect of rent holidays, if any. Leases associated with our multifamily, student housing, and hotel assets are generally short-term in nature, and thus have no straight-line rent.

Hotel revenue isbeen derived from the operations ofconsolidated balance sheet included in the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel and consists primarily of guest room, food and beverage, and other ancillary revenues such as laundry and parking. Hotel revenue is recognized as the services are rendered.Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables related to our consolidated properties of $1.9 million and $1.4 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and included straight-line rental revenue receivables of $0.4 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.  The allowance for doubtful accounts was insignificant as of both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated according to the Company’s capitalization policy, which uses the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of five to seven years.  Furniture, fixtures, and equipment associated with properties classified as held for sale are not depreciated. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.  Accumulated depreciation associated with our furniture, fixtures, and equipment was $5.0 million and $9.9 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Deferred Financing Fees

Deferred financing fees are recorded at cost, accounted for as a reduction to notes payable, and are amortized to interest expense using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method over the life of the related debt. Deferred financing fees, net were $0.5 million and $0.8 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

11

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and have qualified as a REIT since the year ended December 31, 2008.  To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level.  We are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code and intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. Taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income and margin taxes. We currently have no taxable income associated with a TRS. Our operating partnerships are flow-through entities and are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity level.

During 2015, we recorded an aggregate provision for income tax of approximately $2.7 million representing estimated foreign income tax due as a result of the sale of two foreign investments, Alte Jakobstraße (“AJS”) and Holstenplatz.  During the third quarter of 2016, we recorded an income tax benefit of less than $0.1 million representing the difference in the actual taxes due and the originally estimated taxes payable on the sale of Holstenplatz.  During the third quarter of 2017, we recorded an aggregate income tax benefit of approximately $1.6 million consisting of (i) a refund of foreign income tax of approximately $0.8 million and (ii) the reversal of our previously estimated taxes payable on these sales of $0.8 million.

We have reviewed our tax positions under GAAP guidance that clarify the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return. A tax position may only be recognized in the financial statements if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination. We believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions taken relative to our federal tax status as a REIT will be sustained in any tax examination.

Foreign Currency Translation

For our international investments where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, assets and liabilities are translated using period-end exchange rates, while the statement of operations amounts are translated using the average exchange rates for the respective period. Gains and losses resulting from the change in exchange rates from period to period are reported separately as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in theunaudited consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Upon the substantial liquidationfor interim periods are not necessarily indicative of our investment in a foreign entity, the cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) balance is required to be released into earnings. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-05, upon disposal of the property, we recognize the CTA as an adjustment to the resulting gain or loss on sale.

The Euro was the functional currencyresults for the operations of AJS and Holstenplatz, which were both sold in 2015. As a result of the sale of AJS and Holstenplatz, we no longer have foreign operations. However, we still maintain a Euro-denominated bank account that is comprised primarily of the remaining undistributed proceeds from the sale of these properties, which we translate into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each reportingfull year or any other period. As of September 30, 2017, we maintained approximately $5.2 million in Euro-denominated accounts. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the foreign currency translation adjustment was a gain of less than $0.1 million.

 

Concentration of Credit RiskReclassifications 

 

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels.  WeCertain prior period amounts have diversified our cash and cash equivalents among several banking institutions in an attemptbeen reclassified to minimize exposureconform to any one of these entities.  We regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash.

12

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Geographic and Asset Type Concentration

Our investments may at times be concentrated in certain asset types that are subject to higher risk of foreclosure, or secured by assets concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, 42% and 16% of our total revenues were derived from our properties located in Hawaii and Florida, respectively. Additionally, 42%, 31%, and 21% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were from our hotel, multifamily, and student housing investments, respectively. To the extent that our portfolio is concentrated in limited geographic regions or types of assets, downturns relating generally to such region or type of asset may result in defaults on a number of our investments within a short time period, which may reduce our net income and the value of our common stock and accordingly limit our ability to fund our operations. The Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, our only hotel and sole property located in Hawaii, was sold on August 15, 2017. See Note 7 for additional information.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest represents the noncontrolling ownership interest’s proportionate share of the equity in our consolidated real estate investments.  Income and losses are allocated to noncontrolling interest holders based generally on their ownership percentage.   If a property reaches a defined return threshold, then it will result in distributions to noncontrolling interest which is different from the standard pro-rata allocation percentage. In certain instances, our joint venture agreement provides for liquidating distributions based on achieving certain return metrics (“promoted interest”).current year presentation.

 

Earnings per Share

 

The Company had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented. Accordingly, earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period.

4.New Accounting Pronouncements

 

NewRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements to be Adopted

 

In May 2014,February 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an updateAccounting Standards Update (“ASU 2014-09”ASU”) that amends the existing lease accounting guidance and requires lessees to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 outlinesrecognize a single comprehensive modellease liability and a right-of-use asset for entitiesall leases on their balance sheets. Lessees of operating leases will continue to userecognize lease expense in a manner similar to current accounting. For lessors, accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most ofleases under the existing revenue recognition guidance.  The new guidance will require companies to apply a five-step model in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers, as well as enhance disclosures regarding revenue recognition. Lease contracts will be excluded from this revenue recognition criteria; however, the sale of real estate will be required to follow the new model.  ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption is permitted. The Company is continuing to evaluate the standard; however, we do not expect its adoption to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements, as substantially all revenues consist of rental income from leasing arrangements, which is specifically excluded from the standard.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the FASB issued subsequent updates to ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-10”) to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. In May 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-12”) to ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvement and Practical Expedients.  The amendments in these updates did not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606; rather, they added improvements to reduce the diversity in practice at initial application and the cost and complexity of applying Topic 606 both at transition and an ongoing basis. The areas affected include: assessing the collectability criteria; presentation of sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from customers; noncash consideration; contract modification and completed contracts at transition; and technical correction as it relates to retrospective application and disclosure.  The new guidance is substantially the same as in prior periods, but eliminates current real estate- specific provisions and changes the treatment of initial direct costs. The standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 20182019.

The Company elected the following package of practical expedients provided by the standard: (i) an entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contract is a lease or contains a lease, (ii) an entity need not reassess the lease classification of any expired or existing leases, and allows full or modified retrospective application.  We do(iii) an entity need not expectreassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company also elected the adoption of ASU 2016-10short-term lease exception provided for in the standard and ASU 2016-12 to havetherefore will only recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases with a material effect on our consolidated financial statements; however, we will continue to evaluate this assessment until the guidance becomes effective.term greater than one year.

 

 138 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

In February 2016,The Company did not recognize any right-of-use assets or lease liabilities upon adoption of the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-02”) to ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASU 2016-02 supersedes the existing lease accounting model, and modifies both lessee and lessor accounting.standard. The new guidance will require lessees to recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset, initially measured at the present value of lease payments, for both operating and financingCompany does not have any material leases with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statement of earnings. Forsuch as ground leases or building leases or any material leases with a term of 12 monthsgreater than one year. From time to time the Company will enter into immaterial leases for office equipment such as copiers.  The resulting right-of-use assets or less, lessees willlease liabilities would be permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying assetimmaterial in the aggregate and are recognized in the period they are incurred as lease expense.

The ASU provides a practical expedient which allows lessors to not recognizeseparate lease liabilities and non-lease components in a contract and allocate the consideration in the contract to the separate components if both: (i) the timing and pattern of revenue recognition for the non-lease component and the related lease assets. Undercomponent are the same and (ii) the combined single lease component would be classified as an operating lease. The Company elected the practical expedient to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component in lease contracts where we are the lessor. The ASU also provides a transition option that permits entities to not recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the standard, which the Company also elected.

The adoption of this new pronouncement, lessor accounting will be largely unchanged from existing GAAP. The new standard will be effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance willdid not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements when adopted.position or our results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2016-13”) to ASC Topic 326, Credit Losses. This amendednew guidance requires measurement and recognition ofwhich replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology currently in use with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable forecasts. This is different from the current guidance as this will require immediate recognition of estimatedinformation to inform credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of many financial assets. Financial assets that are measured at amortized cost will be required to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected with an allowance for credit losses deducted from the amortized cost basis. Generally, the pronouncement requires a modified retrospective method of adoption. Thisloss estimates.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements when adopted.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an update (“ASU 2017-01”) to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The guidance clarifies the definition of a business and assists in the evaluation of whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or as a business combination. The guidance provides a test to determine when a set of assets and activities acquired is not a business. When substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. Under the updated guidance, an acquisition of a single property will likely be treated as an asset acquisition as opposed to a business combination and associated transaction costs will be capitalized rather than expensed as incurred. Additionally, assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest will be measured at their relative fair values. This guidance is effective for fiscal years andincluding interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including for interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. Uponfiscal years.  The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance, we anticipate future acquisitionsstandard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company has reviewed and determined that other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of real estate assets, if any, will likely qualify as an asset acquisition. Therefore, any future transaction costs associated with an asset acquisition will be capitalizedoperations and accounted for in accordance with the guidance in ASU 2017-01.cash flows, or do not apply to its current operations.

 

5.3.Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair ValueReal Estate Asset Acquisition

 

Fair value measurements areOn February 14, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of a 384-unit multifamily property located in Ann Arbor, Michigan (the “Valley Ranch Apartments”) from an unrelated third party, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $70.3 million, excluding closing and other related transaction costs. In connection with the acquisition, our Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $1.3 million in acquisition fees and acquisition expense reimbursements.

In connection with the acquisition of the Valley Ranch Apartments, the Company simultaneously entered into a $43.4 million non-recourse mortgage loan (the “Valley Ranch Apartments Loan”) collateralized by the Valley Ranch Apartments (see Note 7).

The Company determined this acquisition was an asset acquisition and allocated the total purchase price, including acquisition fees and expenses, to the assets acquired based on their relative fair value. Approximately $24.1 million was allocated to land and improvements, $46.3 million was allocated to building and improvements, and $1.1 million was allocated to in-place lease intangibles.

The capitalization rate for the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independentacquisition of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2Valley Ranch Apartments was approximately 5.35%. The Company calculates the capitalization rate for a real property by dividing the net operating income (“NOI”) of the hierarchy) andproperty by the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3purchase price of the hierarchy)property, excluding costs. For purposes of this calculation, NOI was based upon the year ended November 30, 2018. Additionally, NOI is all gross revenues from the property less all operating expenses, including property taxes and management fees but excluding depreciation.

4.Note Receivable

500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan

On February 28, 2019, the Company entered into a $12.0 million mezzanine loan promissory note (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan”) with an unaffiliated third party (the “500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower”). On the same date, the Company initially funded $8.0 million of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company funded an additional $1.0 million of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. Through June 30, 2019, the Company has been established.funded an aggregate of $9.0 million of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan and as of June 30, 2019, $3.0 million remained unfunded.

 

 149 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted)The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan is recorded in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that we havenote receivable, net on the ability to access.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observableconsolidated balance sheet. In connection with the fundings made for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan, our Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $0.2 million in acquisition fees from the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2019. The acquisition fees are accounted for similar assets as an addition tothe carrying value of the500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loanand liabilities in active markets, as well as inputsare being amortized over the initial term of the500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan using a straight-line method that are observable forapproximates the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such aseffective interest rates, foreign exchange rates,method.

The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan is due August 31, 2021 and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs foris collateralized by the asset or liability that are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.  In instances where the determinationownership interests of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower owns a parcel of land located at 500 West 22nd Street, New York, New York. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR + 11.0% per annum with a floor of 13.493% (13.493% as of June 30, 2019). The Company received an origination fee of 1.0% of the fair value hierarchy, the levelloan balance, or approximately $0.1 million, which ispresented in the fairconsolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying value hierarchy withinof the500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loanand is being amortizedto interest income, using a straight-line method that approximates the effective interest method,over the initial term of the500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. The 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan may be extended two additional six- month periods by the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan Borrower provided certain conditions are met, including the establishment of an additional reserve for interest and the payment of an extension fee equal to 0.25% of the outstanding loan balance.

In connection with the initial funding under the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan, the Company retained approximately $2.1 million of the proceeds to establish a reserve for interest and other items, which ispresented in the fairconsolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the carrying value measurement fallsof the500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loanand are beingapplied against the first 8.0% of monthly interest due during the initial term of the 500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan. The additional monthly interest due is based on the lowest level input that is significantadded to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  Our assessmentbalance of the significance500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan and payable at maturity.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.2 million of a particular inputinterest income, respectively, related to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgmentnote receivable and considers factors specific toas of June 30, 2019, the asset or liability.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

We may use interest rate swaps and caps to manage our interest rate risk.  The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative.  This analysis reflects the contractual termsbalance of the derivatives, including500 West 22nd Street Mezzanine Loan was $9.2 million and the period to maturity,remaining reserves for interest and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, implied volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.

As of September 30, 2017, we have no derivative financial instruments.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

There were no impairment charges recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.other items aggregated $1.8 million.

 

6.5.Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value

 

We determined the following disclosure of estimated fair values using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the related estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions or only estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

 

15

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, management estimated that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, payables/receivables fromaccrued property tax and payables to related parties and distributions payable to noncontrolling interests were at amounts that reasonably approximated their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and short-term maturities. The carrying amount of the note receivable approximates fair value because the interest rate is variable and reflective of the market rate. The fair value of the notes payable is categorized as a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis valuation on the borrowing rates currently available for loans with similar terms and maturities. The fair value of the notes payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market rate. Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016.

2018. Carrying amounts of our notes payable and the related estimated fair value as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 areis summarized as follows:

  As of September 30, 2017  As of December 31, 2016 
  Carrying Amount  Estimated Fair
Value
  Carrying Amount  Estimated Fair
Value
 
Notes payable $103,392  $107,582  $143,119  $146,790 

7.Real Estate and Real Estate-Related Investments

As of September 30, 2017, we consolidated six real estate assets in our consolidated balance sheet. The following table presents certain information about our consolidated investments as of September 30, 2017:

Property Name

DescriptionLocationDate Acquired

Ownership

Interest

Gardens Medical PavilionMedical office buildingPalm Beach Gardens, FloridaOctober 20, 201082%
River Club and the Townhomes at River ClubStudent housingAthens, GeorgiaApril 25, 201185%
Lakes of MargateMultifamilyMargate, FloridaOctober 19, 201192.5%
Arbors Harbor TownMultifamilyMemphis, TennesseeDecember 20, 201194%
22 ExchangeStudent housingAkron, OhioApril 16, 201390%
Arcadian Sugar Land (“Parkside”)MultifamilySugar Land, TexasAugust 8, 201390%

Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel

On June 19, 2017, we, through our indirect 80%-owned subsidiaries, Kauai Coconut Beach, LLC and Kauai Coconut Beach Operator, LLC, (collectively, the “Sellers”) entered into an agreement (the “Courtyard Kauai Agreement”) to sell the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, a 311-room hotel located in Kapaa, Hawaii, to KHS, LLC, (the “Buyer”) an unaffiliated third party, for a contractual sales price of $62.0 million.

On August 15, 2017, the Sellers completed the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel to the Buyer for $62.0 million pursuant to the terms of the Courtyard Kauai Agreement.  In connection with the transaction, the Buyer assumed the existing outstanding mortgage indebtedness of $36.0 million secured by the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The net proceeds from the disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel were approximately $24.1 million, after the payment of closing costs, expenses, pro rations and other working capital adjustments and a payment of a payment of approximately $1.7 million to the minority owner of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. In connection with the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, we recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $20.9 million on our consolidated statements of operations during the third quarter of 2017.

 

 1610 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

In connection with the sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, certain funds were placed in escrow with a qualified intermediary in order to facilitate potential like-kind exchange transactions in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The balance of the escrow account was approximately $27.0 million as of September 30, 2017 and is included in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.

The disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since the disposition did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through its respective date of disposition.

  As of June 30, 2019  As of December 31, 2018 
  Carrying Amount  Estimated Fair
Value
  Carrying Amount  Estimated Fair
Value
 
Notes payable $213,223  $217,982  $141,423  $140,986 

 

8.6.Investment in Unconsolidated Joint VentureMarketable Securities and Fair Value Measurements

We provided mezzanine financing totaling $15.3 million to an unaffiliated third-party entity (the “Borrower”) that owns an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado (the “Huron”).  The Borrower also has a senior construction loan with a third-party construction lender (the “Senior Lender”) in an aggregate original principal amount of $40 million.  The senior construction loan is guaranteed by the owners of the developer.  We also have a personal guaranty from the owners of the developer guaranteeing completion of the project and payment of cost overruns. Our mezzanine loan is secured by all of the membership interests of the Borrower and is subordinate to the senior construction loan. Our advances of $15.3 million initially had annual stated interest rates ranging from 10% to 18%. We evaluated this ADC Arrangement and determined that the characteristics are similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership. Accordingly, the investment is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting since we will participate in the residual interests through the sale or refinancing of the property. 

Both the senior loan and our mezzanine loan were in technical default at December 31, 2016 due to a delay in completion of the project. The project was subsequently completed in January 2017. On March 23, 2017, the Senior Lender executed a loan amendment extending the maturity date of the loan to March 24, 2018. The Senior Lender loan amendment also increased the interest rate 75 basis points to 30-day LIBOR plus 375 basis points and added provisions to require the maintenance of certain prescribed minimum occupancy and rental rates at future dates. On May 8, 2017, we amended the mezzanine loan agreement to mirror the maturity date of the senior loan and changed our interest rate to 11% for the entire balance of the loan. The amended mezzanine loan agreement was effective as of March 1, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance under the mezzanine loan was $15.3 million. The Borrower funded all cost overruns.

We considered the impact of these events on our accounting treatment and determined the ADC Arrangement should still continue to be accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting. We will continue to monitor this situation and assess any impact these or future events might have on our ability to ultimately realize the carrying value of our investment. The ADC Arrangement is reassessed at each reporting period.

In connection with our investment in the Huron, we capitalized interest of $176 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. There was no interest capitalized on our investment in the Huron during the three months ended September 30, 2016 or during the 2017 periods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we recorded no equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint venture related to our investment in the Huron. The Company’s maximum exposure to losses associated with its unconsolidated joint venture is limited to its carrying value in this investment.Marketable Securities

 

The following table sets forth our ownership interestis a summary of the Company’s available for sale securities as of the dates indicated:

  As of June 30, 2019 
  Adjusted Cost  Gross Unrealized
Gains
  Gross Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
Debt securities:                
Corporate and Government Bonds $5,293  $93  $(3) $5,383 
                 
  As of December 31, 2018 
  Adjusted Cost  Gross Unrealized
Gains
  Gross Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
Debt securities:                
Corporate and Government Bonds $14,575  $15  $(204) $14,386 

When evaluating the investments for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company reviews factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer and any changes thereto, and the Company’s intent to sell, or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell, the investment before recovery of the investment’s amortized cost basis. As of June 30, 2019, the Company did not recognize any impairment charges.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the Huron:principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

 

  Ownership Interest  Carrying Amount 
Property Name September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
The Huron N/A  N/A  $14,658  $14,658 

The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

 1711 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Summarized balance sheet information for the unconsolidated joint venture as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, shown at 100%, is as follows:

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Total assets $69,769  $72,272 
         
Total debt, net $61,745  $56,638 
         
Total equity $8,024  $11,957 

Summarized statement of operations information for the unconsolidated joint venture for the periods indicated, shown at 100%, is as follows:

  For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
  For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Total revenues $1,962  $197  $2,069  $251 
Net loss  (2,000)  (1,346)  (6,835)  (2,354)

9.Variable Interest Entities

Effective January 1, 2016, we adopted the guidance in ASU 2015-02. As a result, the Operating Partnership (see Note 1) and each of our less than wholly-owned real estate partnerships (22 Exchange, LLC, Gardens Medical Pavilion, LLC, SL Parkside Apartments, LLC, and the ADC Arrangement associated with the Huron) have been deemed to have the characteristics of a VIE. However, we were not required to consolidate any previously unconsolidated entities or deconsolidate any previously consolidated entities as a result of the change in classification. Accordingly, there has been no change to the amounts reported in our consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows or amounts recognized in our consolidated statements of operations.

Consolidated VIEs

The Company consolidates the Operating Partnership, 22 Exchange, LLC, Gardens Medical Pavilion, LLC through BH-AW-Florida MOB Venture, LLC, and SL Parkside Apartments, LLC, which are variable interest entities, or VIEs, for which we are the primary beneficiary. Generally, a VIE is a legal entity in which the equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or the equity investors lack sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. A limited partnership, or legal entities such as an LLC, are considered a VIE when the majority of the limited partners unrelated to the general partner possess neither the right to remove the general partner without cause, nor certain rights to participate in the decisions that most significantly affect the financial results of the partnership. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we consider qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and which party controls such activities; the amount and characteristics of our investment; the obligation or likelihood for us or other investors to provide financial support; and the similarity with and significance to our business activities and the business activities of the other investors. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.

Unconsolidated VIEs

Included in the Company’s joint venture investments as of September 30, 2017 is the ADC Arrangement associated with the Huron, which is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture and is a VIE. Refer to Note 8 for further details on the ADC Arrangement. This arrangement was established to provide mezzanine financing to an unaffiliated third party that owns the Huron, an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado. Based on our reevaluation under ASU 2015-02, we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of this VIE based on the rights of the general partner. The arrangement does not allow for substantive kick-out rights over the general partner and we do not have the power to direct the activities of the Huron that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance. Accordingly, we have determined it is appropriate, consistent with past accounting, that the Huron ADC Arrangement will continue to be accounted for under the equity method.

18

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

10.Notes PayableLevel 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

The following table sets forth information on our notes payable asfair values of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

       Amount Due  Notes Payable as of 
Description Interest Rate  Maturity Date at Maturity  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel  Repaid in full on 5/8/2017 (See note below)    $-  $-  $38,000 
Gardens Medical Pavilion  4.90%  1/1/2018  12,480   12,587   12,899 
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club  5.26% 5/1/2018  23,368   23,615   23,917 
Lakes of Margate  5.49% and 5.92%  1/1/2020  13,384   14,042   14,243 
Arbors Harbor Town  3.99% 1/1/2019  23,632   24,280   24,653 
22 Exchange  3.93% 5/5/2023  16,875   19,051   19,307 
Parkside(1)  5% 6/1/2018  9,560   9,817   10,100 
Total debt       $99,299   103,392   143,119 
Deferred financing fees            (490)  (787)
Total notes payable, net           $102,902  $142,332 

(1) Includes approximately $0.1 million of unamortized premium related tothe Company’s investments in debt we assumed at acquisition.

securities are measured using quoted prices for these investments; however, the markets for these assets are not active. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, our outstanding notes payable were $102.9 million, net of deferred financing fees of $0.5 million, and had a weighted-average interest rate of 5.0%. For loans in place as of September 30, 2017, we have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor2019, all of the unaffiliated lenders with respect toCompany’s debt securities were classified as Level 2 assets and there were no transfers between the 22 Exchange and Parkside notes payable.

We are subject to various customary financial covenants, including, maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios, loan to value ratios and liquidity. We did not meetlevel classifications during the debt service coverage requirements for our 22 Exchange loan as of March 31, 2017,six months ended June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2017. As a result, we expect the lender to begin sweeping the cash from operations; however, the loan is not in default.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had debt of approximately $12.6 million associated with Gardens Medical Pavilion, approximately $23.6 million associated with River Club and Townhomes at River Club, and $9.8 million associated with Parkside maturing in the next twelve months.

If we do not dispose of Gardens Medical Pavilion, River Club and Townhomes at River Club or Parkside by their maturity dates, we expect to repay the outstanding balances with available cash or refinance all or a portion of the balances outstanding.2019.

 

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of our investments in marketable debt securities with stated contractual obligations for principal payments, based on initial scheduled maturity dates, accounted for as available-for-sale securities and does not reflectclassified by the exercisecontractual maturity date of any extension options, asthe securities:

  As of June 30, 2019 
Due in 1 year $1,095 
Due in 1 year through 5 years  4,288 
Due in 5 years through 10 years  - 
Due after 10 years  - 
Total $5,383 

7.Notes Payable

Notes payable consists of September 30, 2017:the following:

Property Interest Rate Weighted Average
Interest Rate as of
June 30, 2019
  Maturity Date Amount Due at
Maturity
  As of
June 30, 2019
  As of
December 31, 2018
 
                 
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club LIBOR + 1.78%  4.18%  May 1, 2025 $28,419  $30,359  $30,359 
                     
Gardens Medical Pavilion LIBOR + 1.90%  5.17%  June 1, 2021  12,300   12,780   12,900 
                     
Lakes of Margate 5.49% and 5.92%  5.75%  January 1, 2020  13,384   13,537   13,687 
                     
Arbors Harbor Town 4.53%  4.53% December 28, 2025  29,000   29,000   29,000 
                     
Parkside 4.45%  4.45%  June 1, 2025  15,782   17,733   17,877 
                     
Axis at Westmont 4.39%  4.39%  February 1, 2026  34,343   37,600   37,600 
                     
Vally Ranch Apartments 4.16%  4.16%  March 1, 2026  43,414   43,414   - 
                     
Flats at Fishers 3.78%  3.78%  July 1, 2026  26,090   28,800   - 
                     
Total notes payable    4.39%   $202,732   213,223   141,423 
                     
Less: Deferred financing costs              (3,546)  (2,407)
                     
Total notes payable, net             $209,677  $139,016 

The Company’s loan agreements stipulate that it complies with certain reporting and financial covenants. The Company is currently in compliance with all of its debt covenants.

On February 14, 2019, the Company entered into the Valley Ranch Apartments Loan scheduled to mature on March 1, 2026. The Valley Ranch Apartments Loan bears interest at 4.16% and requires monthly interest-only payments through its stated maturity. The Valley Ranch Apartments Loan is collateralized by the Valley Ranch Apartments and is non-recourse to the Company. In connection with the Valley Ranch Apartments Loan, our Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $0.4 million in financing fees.

 

 1912 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

Year Amount Due 
October 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 $550 
2018  46,808 
2019  24,308 
2020  13,771 
2021  404 
Thereafter  17,441 
Total contractual obligations for principal payments  103,282 
Unamortized premium  110 
Total notes payable  103,392 
Less:  Deferred financing fees, net  (490)
Notes payable, net $102,902 

Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel Debt

Our debt secured by Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, with an outstanding balance of $38On June 13, 2019, the Company entered into a seven-year $28.8 million as of December 31, 2016, wasmortgage loan (the “Flats at Fishers Loan”) scheduled to mature on May 9, 2017. On May 8, 2017,July 1, 2026. The Flats at Fishers Loan bears interest at 3.78% and requires monthly interest-only payments through the first two years of the loan term and thereafter, monthly payments of principal and interest based upon a 30-year amortization. The Flats at Fishers Loan is collateralized by the Flats at Fishers and is non-recourse to the Company. In connection with the Flats at Fishers Loan, our Advisor received an aggregate of approximately $0.3 million in financing fees.

The following table provides information with respect to the contractual maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our indebtedness as of June 30, 2019.

  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  Thereafter  Total 
Principal maturities $417  $13,924  $13,443  $1,468  $2,122  $181,849  $213,223 
                             
Less: deferred financing costs                          (3,546)
                             
Total notes payable, net                         $209,677 

In addition, the Company’s non-recourse mortgage loan secured by the Lakes of Margate (outstanding principal balance of $13.5 million as of June 30, 2019) matures in January 2020. We currently expect to refinance all or a portion of this maturing indebtedness on or before its scheduled maturity. However, if we through our 80% ownership interest in a joint venture between our indirect wholly owned subsidiary and JMI Realty, LLC, an unaffiliated third party (the “Kauai Joint Venture���), entered into a new mortgage facility of upare unable to $44 million (the “Courtyard Kauai Loan”) with TH Commercial Investment Corp. Initial borrowings of $36 million were advanced underrefinance the Courtyard Kauai Loan and those funds plus additional cash were usedoutstanding indebtedness at favorable terms, we will look to repay the then outstanding balance under the previous loan with Wells Fargo Bank. The Courtyard Kauai Loan bore interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 4.7% and was scheduled to mature in three years with two one-year extensions available. We had also guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the lender.  

On August 15, 2017, the Courtyard Kauai Loan was assumed by the Buyer in connection with our sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The outstanding balance as of the date of sale was $36.0 million. See Note 7 for additional information.available cash and/or proceeds from selective asset sales.

 

11.8.Leasing ActivityLeases

 

FutureThe Company’s office, multi-family and student housing properties are leased to tenants under operating leases. Substantially all of our multi-family and student housing leases have initial terms of 12 months or less. Our office leases expire between 2019 and 2025.

We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and continue to account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue fixed lease income on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. Some of our tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize this variable lease consideration only when each tenant’s sales exceed the applicable sales threshold. We amortize any tenant inducements as a reduction of revenue utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease.

We structure our leases to allow us to recover a portion of our property operating expenses from our tenants. A portion of our leases require the tenant to reimburse us for a portion of our operating expenses, including common area maintenance (“CAM”), real estate taxes and insurance. Such property operating expenses typically include utility, insurance and other administrative expenses. For some of our leases we receive a fixed payment from the tenant for the CAM component which is recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. When not reimbursed by the fixed CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant’s proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses for the property. We accrue reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of all of these expenses as variable lease consideration in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. We recognize differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year. These differences were not material in any period presented.

As of June 30, 2019, the approximate fixed future minimum base rental payments, of ourexcluding variable lease consideration, from the Company’s office property, Gardens Medical Pavilion, and the retail space at 22 Exchange due to us under non-cancelable leases in effect as of September 30, 2017 are as follows:

 

Year  Amount Due 
 Remainder of 2017  $394 
 2018   1,362 
 2019   1,096 
 2020   995 
 2021   868 
 Thereafter   2,411 
 Total  $7,126 
2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  Thereafter  Total 
$794  $1,471  $1,118  $973  $895  $767  $6,018 
                           

 

The schedule above does not include rental payments due to us from our multifamily and student housing properties, as leases associated with these properties typically are for periods of one year or less.

 2013 

 

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

12.Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

WePursuant to the lease agreements, tenants of the property may be exposedrequired to reimburse the risk associated with variabilityCompany for some or the entire portion of interest rates that might impact our cash flowsthe particular tenant's pro rata share of the real estate taxes and operating expenses of the results of operations.  The hedging strategy of entering into interest rate caps and swaps, therefore, is to eliminate or reduce, toproperty. Such amounts are not included in the extent possible, the volatility of cash flows.

As of September 30, 2017, we did not have any derivative instruments and were not engagefuture minimum lease payments above, but are included in any hedging activities.

Our derivative financial instruments had a nominal effectrental revenues on the accompanying consolidated statements of operationsoperations. Rental revenue of approximately $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019, respectively, and 2016.rental revenue of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, related to variable lease payments was included in rental revenues on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has excluded our multi-family and student housing leases from this table as substantially all of its multi-family and student housing leases have initial terms of 12 months of less.

 

13.9.Distributions

 

U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. These analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, changes in market capitalization rates for investments suitable for our portfolio, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales, and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. Our board of director’s decisions will be substantially influenced by the obligation to ensure that we maintain our federal tax status as a REIT. We cannot provide assurance that we will pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

 

14.10.Related Party Transactions

 

Advisor

 

Our external advisor and certain of its affiliates may receive fees and compensation in connection with the management and sale of our assets based on an advisory management agreement, as amended and restated.

 

From January 4, 2008 through February 10, 2017, we were party to successive advisory management agreements, each with a term of one year or less, with the Behringer Advisor. The most recently executed advisory management agreement was the Fifth Amended and Restated Advisory Management Agreement (the “Fifth Advisory Agreement”) entered into on July 25, 2016 and effective as of June 6, 2016. On February 10, 2017, we entered into a Termination of Advisory Management Agreement with the Behringer Advisor and (solely with respect to certain sections) Behringer (the “Advisory Termination Agreement”) pursuant to which the Fifth Advisory Agreement was terminated as of the close of business on February 10, 2017.

Concurrently with our entry into the Advisory Termination Agreement, we engaged the Advisor to provide us with advisory services pursuant to two separate advisory management agreements (collectively, the “Lightstone Advisory Agreement”). With the exception of the Administrative Services Fee, the fees earned by and expenses reimbursed to the Advisor pursuant to the Lightstone Advisory Agreement are identical to the fees earned by and expenses reimbursed to the Behringer Advisor pursuant to the Fifth Advisory Agreement. The following discussion describes the fees and expenses payable to our external advisor and its respective affiliates under both the Fifth Advisory Agreement and the Lightstone Advisory Agreement.various advisory management agreements.

 

We pay our external advisor acquisition and advisory fees of 1.5% of the amount paid in respect of the purchase, development, construction, or improvement of each asset we acquire, including any debt attributable to those assets. In addition, we pay acquisition and advisory fees of 1.5% of the funds advanced in respect of a loan investment. WeFor the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 we incurred no acquisition and advisory fees payable to our external advisor of approximately $0.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively. We incurred no acquisition and advisory fees for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 20162018 because we had no acquisitions during these periods.

21

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

We also pay our external advisor an acquisition expense reimbursement in the amount of (i) 0.25% of the funds paid for purchasing an asset, including any debt attributable to the asset, plus 0.25% of the funds budgeted for development, construction, or improvement in the case of assets that we acquire and intend to develop, construct, or improve or (ii) 0.25% of the funds advanced in respect of a loan investment. We also pay third parties, or reimburse our external advisor or its affiliates, for any investment-related expenses due to third parties in the case of a completed investment, including, but not limited to, legal fees and expenses, travel and communication expenses, costs of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, third-party brokerage or finder’s fees, title insurance, premium expenses, and other closing costs.

 

Our external advisor and its affiliates are also responsible for paying all of the investment-related expenses that we or the external advisor or its affiliates incur that are due to third parties or related to the additional services provided by our external advisor as described above with respect to investments we do not make, other than certain non-refundable payments made in connection with any acquisition. For the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, we incurred no acquisition expense reimbursements.

 

14

We pay

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

Prior to June 10, 2018 we paid our external advisor a debt financing fee of 0.5% of the amount available under any loan or line of credit made available to us and pay directly all third-party costs associated with obtaining the debt financing. Duringfinancing, on June 10, 2018 we amended the second quarter of 2017, we incurred aadvisory management agreement with our advisor and increased the debt financing fee to 1.0% of $0.2the amount available under any loan or line of credit made available to us and pay directly all third-party costs associated with obtaining the debt financing. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, we incurred $0.3 million related to the Courtyard Kauai Loan.and $0.7 million of debt financing fees, respectively. We incurred no debt financing fees for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2018.

 

We pay our external advisor a development fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered to similar projects in the geographic market of the project if such affiliate provides the development services and if a majority of our independent directors determines that such development fee is fair and reasonable to us.  We incurred no development fees for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

We pay our external advisor a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 0.7% of the value of each asset. The value of our assets will be the value as determined in connection with the establishment and publication of an estimated net asset value (“NAV”) per share unless the asset was acquired after our publication of an estimated valuea NAV per share (in which case the value of the asset will be the contractual purchase price of the asset). For the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, we expensed $0.4$0.7 million and $1.4$1.2 million, respectively, of asset management fees payable to our external advisor compared to $0.5advisor. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we expensed $0.4 million and $1.6$0.8 million, for the same periods in 2016, respectively.respectively, of asset management fees payable to our external advisor.

 

Our external advisor is responsible for paying all of the expenses it incurs associated with persons employed by the external advisor to the extent that they provide services to us for which our external advisor receives an acquisition, asset management, or debt financing fee, including wages and benefits of the applicable personnel. Instead of reimbursing our external advisor for specific expenses paid or incurred in connection with providing services to us, we pay our external advisor an administrative services fee, (also referred to aswhich is an administrative services reimbursement underallocation of a portion of the Lightstone Advisory Agreement) based on a budget of expenses prepared byactual costs that the external advisor.advisor paid or incurred providing these services to us (the “Administrative Services Reimbursement”). The administrative services feeAdministrative Services Reimbursement is intended to reimburse the external advisor for all its costs associated with providing services to us.

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2017,period January 1, 2018 through June 10, 2018, the administrative services fee is $1.325Administrative Services Reimbursement was up to $1.3 million annually, pro-rated for the first six months ofperiod. For the period June 11, 2018 through June 10, 2019, the Administrative Services Reimbursement was up to $1.29 million. On June 10, 2019, the advisory management agreements were extended an additional year and $1.30 million annually, pro-rated forthrough June 10, 2020. For the second six months ofperiod June 11, 2019 through June 10, 2020, the year. Under the Fifth Advisory Agreement, for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016, the administrative services fee was the lesser of (i) $1.325 million per calendar year, and (ii) the actual costs of providing administrative servicesAdministrative Services Reimbursement is up to us under the Fifth Advisory Agreement,$1.31 million. The Administrative Services Reimbursement is payable in four equal quarterly installments within 45 days of the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, under the various advisory management agreements, we are to reimburse the external advisor for certain due diligence services provided in connection with asset acquisitions and dispositions and debt financings separately from the administrative services fee. ForAdministrative Services Reimbursement. We incurred and expensed $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, we incurred2019, respectively, and expensed$0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, of such costs for administrative services and due diligence services of approximately $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively, compared to approximately $0.9 million and $1.2 million for the same periods in 2016, respectively. These amounts include less than $0.1 million related to certain due diligence services provided during the respective periods.

22

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)services.

 

Notwithstanding the fees and cost reimbursements payable to our external advisor pursuant to our advisory management agreement, under our charter we may not reimburse the external advisor for any amount by which our operating expenses (including the asset management fee) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of: (i) 2% of our average invested assets, or (ii) 25% of our net income determined without reduction for any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts, or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of our assets for that period unless a majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. For the four fiscal quarters ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, our total operating expenses (including the asset management fee) exceeded the limit on total operating expenses; however, our independent directors determined the excess expenses were justified becauseprimarily as a result of the timing of the redeployment of our transition to the new external advisor.cash proceeds from asset sales and financings.

 

Property Manager

 

From January 4, 2008 through February 10, 2017, we were party to a property management and leasing agreement (as amended and restated, the “Behringer Property Management Agreement”) between us, our operating partnership, Behringer Harvard Opportunity Management Services, LLC, and Behringer Harvard Real Estate Services, LLC (collectively, the “Behringer Manager”). On February 10, 2017, we entered into a TerminationThe Company engaged an affiliate of Property Management and Leasing Agreement with the Behringer Manager and (solely with respect to certain sections) Behringer (the “Property Management Termination Agreement”) pursuant to which the Behringer Property Management Agreement was terminated as of the close of business on February 10, 2017.

Concurrently with our entry into the Property Management Termination Agreement, we engaged LSG-BH II Property Manager LLCLightstone (the “Lightstone Manager”) pursuant to a property management and leasing agreement (the “Lightstone Property Management Agreement”).agreement. The fees earned by and expenses reimbursed to the Lightstone Manager pursuant toare substantially the Lightstone Property Management Agreement are identical tosame as the fees earned by and expenses reimbursed to the Behringer Manager pursuant to the Behringer Property Management Agreement.Manager. The following discussion describes the fees and expenses payable to our affiliated property manager and its respective affiliates under both the Behringer Property Management Agreement (in effect from August 13, 2008 through February 10, 2017)various property management and the leasing agreements.

15

Lightstone Property Management Agreement (in effect as of February 10, 2017).Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

We pay our property manager and affiliate of our external advisor, fees for the management, leasing, and construction supervision of our properties which is 4.0% of gross revenues of the properties managed by our property manager. We pay our property manager an oversight fee equal to 0.5% of the gross revenues of the property managed for any property for which we contract directly with a third-party property manager.  In no event will our property manager or its affiliates receive both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property.  In the event we own a property through a joint venture that does not pay our property manager directly for its services, we will pay our property manager a management fee or oversight fee, as applicable, based only on our economic interest in the property.   For the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, we incurred and expensed property management fees or oversight fees to the related-party property manager of less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we incurred and expensed property management fees or oversight fees to the related-party property manager of $0.1 million, respectively, compared to $0.1 million and $0.4 million in the same periods in 2016, respectively.million.

 

We pay our property manager a construction management fee in an amount not to exceed 5% of all hard construction costs incurred in connection with, but not limited to capital repairs and improvements, major building reconstruction and tenant improvements, if such affiliate supervises construction performed by or on behalf of us or our affiliates. We incurred no construction management fees for the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

As of Septemberboth June 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, we had a payable to our external advisor and its affiliates of less than $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively.million. These balances consist of accrued fees, including asset management fees, administrative service expenses, property management fees, and other miscellaneous costs payable to our external advisor and property manager.

23

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc.

(Formerly Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(Dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share/unit data and where indicated in millions)

 

We are dependent on our external advisor and our property manager for certain services that are essential to us, including asset disposition decisions, property management and leasing services, and other general administrative responsibilities.  In the event that these companies were unable to provide us with their respective services, we would be required to obtain such services from other sources.

 

15.11.Subsequent EventsInvestment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

Share Redemption ProgramWe provided mezzanine financing totaling $15.3 million to an unaffiliated third-party entity (the “Borrower”) that owned an apartment complex in Denver, Colorado (the “Prospect Park”). The Borrower also had a senior construction loan with a third-party construction lender (the “Senior Lender”) in an aggregate original principal amount of $40.0 million. The senior construction loan was guaranteed by the owners of the developer. We also had a personal guaranty from the owners of the developer guaranteeing completion of Prospect Park and payment of any cost overruns. Our mezzanine loan was secured by all of the membership interests of the Borrower and was subordinate to the senior construction loan. Our advances of $15.3 million initially had annual stated interest rates ranging from 10% to 18%.

Pursuant to the terms of the mezzanine loan, we participated in the residual interests of Prospect Park attributable to a sale or refinancing even though we had no actual ownership interest. We previously evaluated this ADC Arrangement and determined that its characteristics were similar to a jointly-owned investment or partnership. Accordingly, our investment, which was a variable interest entity (“VIE”) was accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting instead of loan accounting.

On November 8,December 15, 2017, our board of directors approved redemptionsthe Borrower sold Prospect Park to an unrelated third-party for the third quarter of 2017 totaling 239 thousand shares with an aggregate redemption paymenta contractual sales price of approximately $1.2$100.5 million. See Part II, Item 2, “Unregistered SalesIn connection with the sale, the Borrower repaid the Senior Construction Loan in full and we received aggregate proceeds of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” for aapproximately $21.6 million representing the repayment in full description of the price atoutstanding principal and accrued interest due on our mezzanine loan. Additionally, the Borrower placed approximately $15.1 million of the net proceeds from the sale into an escrow account to be used for settlement of the amount due to us for our participation in the residual interests of Prospect Park. The carrying value of our unconsolidated investment in Prospect Park, which we redeem shares underrepresented the minimum amount payable to us for our share redemption program.participation in the residual interests of Prospect Park, was $10.9 million as of December 31, 2018.

On January 4, 2019, the Company and the Borrower received payments of $10.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, from the escrow account. As a result, the carrying value of our unconsolidated investment in Prospect Park has been reduced to zero and as of June 30, 2019, approximately $2.3 million remains in the escrow account to be used for settlement of any potential remaining amount due to us for our participation in the residual interests of Prospect Park and any additional amounts received will be recognized upon receipt.

 

 2416 

 

 

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements include discussion and analysis of the financial condition of the Company, including our ability to rent space on favorable terms, to address our debt maturities and to fund our liquidity requirements, to sell our assets when we believe advantageous to achieve our investment objectives, our anticipated capital expenditures, the amount and timing of anticipated future cash distributions to our stockholders, the estimated per share value of our common stock, and other matters.  Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

 

These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, the economy, and other future conditions.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution stockholders not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described herein and under “Item 1A, Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2017 and the factors described below:

 

market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. and global economies or real estate industry as a whole and the local economic conditions in the markets in which our investments are located;

 

the availability of cash flow from operating activities for distributions, if any;

 

conflicts of interest arising out of our relationships with our advisor and its affiliates;

 

our ability to retain or replace our executive officers and other key individuals who provide advisory and property management services to us;

 

our level of debt and the terms and limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements;

 

the availability of credit generally, and any failure to obtain debt financing at favorable terms or a failure to satisfy the conditions and requirements of that debt;

 

our ability to make accretive investments in a diversified portfolio of assets; 

 

future changes in market factors that could affect the ultimate performance of ourany development or redevelopment projects that we undertake, including but not limited to construction costs, plan or design changes, schedule delays, availability of construction financing, performance of developers, contractors and consultants, and growth in rental rates and operating costs;

 

our ability to secure leases at favorable rental rates;

 

our ability to acquire and/or sell assets at a price and on a timeline consistent with our investment objectives;

 

impairment charges;

 

unfavorable changes in laws or regulations impacting our business, our assets, or our key relationships; and

 

factors that could affect our ability to qualify as a real estate investment trust. 

 

 2517 

 

 

Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Report, and may ultimately prove to be incorrect.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results, except as required by applicable law.  We intend for these forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

 

Cautionary Note

 

The representations, warranties, and covenants made by us in any agreement filed as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to the agreement, and should not be deemed to be representations, warranties, or covenants to or with any other parties.  Moreover, these representations, warranties, or covenants should not be relied upon as accurately describing or reflecting the current state of our affairs.

 

Executive Overview

 

We were formed primarily to acquire and operate commercial real estate and real estate-related assets on an opportunistic and value-add basis.  In particular, we have focused generally on acquiring commercial properties with significant possibilities for capital appreciation, such as those requiring development, redevelopment or repositioning, those located in markets and submarkets with high growth potential, and those available from sellers who were distressed or faced time-sensitive deadlines.  In addition, our opportunistic and value-add investment strategy has included investments in real estate-related assets that present opportunities for higher current income. Since inception, we have acquired a wide variety of commercial properties, including office, industrial, retail, hospitality, and multifamily. We have purchased existing, income-producing properties and newly constructed properties. We have also invested in other real estate-related investments such as mortgage and mezzanine loans. We have made our investments in or in respect of real estate assets located in the United States and other countries based on our view of existing market conditions. Currently, our investments include multifamilyproperties (multifamily and student housing communities, and an office building,building) and a mezzanine loan. All of our current investments are located in the United States.

 

Our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange.  The timing of a liquidity event for our stockholders will depend upon then prevailing market conditions. We previously targeted the commencement of a liquidity event within six years after the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on July 3, 2011. On June 29, 2017, our board of directors elected to extend the targeted timeline an additional six years until June 30, 2023 based on their assessment of our investment objectives and liquidity options for our stockholders. However, we can provide no assurances as to the actual timing of the commencement of a liquidity event for our stockholders or the ultimate liquidation of the Company. We will seek stockholder approval prior to liquidating our entire portfolio.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $53.2$38.6 million and marketable securities, available for sale of $5.4 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2019. Our principal demands for funds going forward will be for the payment of (a) operating expenses, (b) interest and principal payments on our outstanding indebtedness, (c) share redemptions and (d) distributions, if any, authorized by our board of directors.directors, (d) funding of our mezzanine loan and (e) other real estate or real estate-related investments. Generally, we expect to meet the cash needs for the payment of operating expenses, interest onthese items with our outstanding indebtedness and share redemptions withavailable cash as well as our future cash flow from operations, and to fund authorized distributions (if any) from available cash flow from operations and/or proceeds received from asset sales. To the extent that our cash flow from operations is not sufficient to cover our operating expenses, interest on our outstanding indebtedness, or share redemptions, we expect to use cash generated from borrowings andpotential asset sales to fund such needs.

and/or new borrowings. We intend to hold our various real properties until such time as our board of directors determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that the objectives will not be met.

 

26

On January 5, 2016, we paid a special cash distribution of $38.4 million, or $1.50 per share of common stock, which was funded from proceeds received from asset sales.

The debt secured by Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, with an outstanding balance of $38 million was scheduled to mature on May 9, 2017. On May 8, 2017, we, through our 80% ownership interest in a joint venture between our indirect wholly owned subsidiary and JMI Realty, LLC, an unaffiliated third party (the “Kauai Joint Venture”), entered into a new mortgage facility of up to $44 million (the “Courtyard Kauai Loan”) with TH Commercial Investment Corp. Initial borrowings of $36 million were advanced under the Courtyard Kauai Loan and those funds plus additional cash were used to repay the then outstanding balance under the previous loan with Wells Fargo Bank. The Courtyard Kauai Loan bore interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 4.7% and was scheduled to mature in three years with two one-year extensions available. We also had guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the lender.

On August 15, 2017, the Courtyard Kauai Loan was assumed by the buyer in connection with our sale of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel. The outstanding balance as of the date of sale was $36.0 million. In connection with the sale of the Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel, certain funds were placed in escrow with a qualified intermediary in order to facilitate potential like-kind exchange transactions in accordance with Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The balance of the escrow account was approximately $27.0 million as of September 30, 2017 and is included in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet. See Note 7 for additional information.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had debt of approximately $12.6 million associated with Gardens Medical Pavilion, approximately $23.6 million associated with River Club and Townhomes at River Club, and $9.8 million associated with Parkside maturing in the next twelve months.

If we do not dispose of Gardens Medical Pavilion, River Club and Townhomes at River Club or Parkside by their maturity dates, we expect to repay the outstanding balances with available cash or refinance all or a portion of the balances outstanding. In addition to our debt obligations, we consider other factors in evaluating our liquidity. For example, to the extent our portfolio is concentrated in certain geographic regions and types of assets, downturns relating generally to such regions and assets may result in tenants defaulting on their lease obligations at a number of our properties within a short time period.  Such defaults could negatively affect our liquidity and adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, 42% and 16% of our total revenues were derived from our properties located in Hawaii and Florida, respectively. Additionally, 42%, 31% and 21% of our total revenues were from our hotel, multifamily and student housing investments, respectively.

18

 

We may, but are not required to, establish capital reserves from cash flow generated by operating properties and other investments, or net sales proceeds from the sale of our properties and other investments.  Capital reserves are typically utilized for non-operating expenses such as tenant improvements, leasing commissions, and major capital expenditures.  Alternatively, a lender may establish its own criteria for escrow of capital reserves.

 

We have borrowed and may continue to borrow money to acquire properties and make other investments.  Under our charter, the maximum amount of our indebtedness is limited to 300% of our “net assets” (as defined by our charter) as of the date of any borrowing; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors.  In addition to our charter limitation, our board of directors has adopted a policy to generally limit our aggregate borrowings to approximately 75% of the aggregate value of our assets unless substantial justification exists that borrowing a greater amount is in our best interests.  Our policy limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets.

 

Commercial real estate debt markets may experience volatility and uncertainty as a result of certain related factors, including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies, macro-economic issues related to fiscal, tax and regulatory policies, and global financial issues.  Should the overall cost of borrowings increase, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, we will need to factor such increases into the economics of our developments and investments.  This may result in our investment operations generating lower overall economic returns and a reduced level of cash flow, which could potentially impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.  In addition, disruptions in the debt markets may reduce the amount of capital that is available to finance real estate, which in turn could: (i) lead to a decline in real estate values generally; (ii) slow real estate transaction activity; (iii) reduce the loan to value ratio upon which lenders are willing to extend debt; and (iv) result in difficulty in refinancing debt as it becomes due, all of which may reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on the value of real estate investments and the revenues, income or cash flow from the operations of real properties and mortgage loans.

 

27

Debt Financings

 

From time to time, we have obtained mortgage, bridge, or mezzanine loans for acquisitions and investments, as well as property development.  In the future, we may obtain financingnew financings to acquire properties and for property renovation development and redevelopment activities or refinance our existing real estate assets, depending on multiple factors.

 

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, our outstanding notes payable were $102.9$209.7 million, net of deferred financing fees of $0.5$3.5 million, and had a weighted average interest rate of 5.0%4.4%. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had notes payable of $142.3$139.0 million, net of deferred financing fees of $0.8$2.4 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.9%4.3%. For loans in place as of September 30, 2017, we have guaranteed payment of certain recourse liabilities with respect to certain customary nonrecourse carveouts as set forth in the guaranties in favor of the unaffiliated lenders with respect to the 22 Exchange and Parkside notes payable.

 

We are subject to various customaryOur loan agreements stipulate that we comply with certain reporting and financial covenants.  These covenants including,include, among other things, maintaining minimum debt service coverage ratios, loan to value ratios, and liquidity.  We did not meetare currently in compliance with all of our debt covenants.

Our non-recourse mortgage loan secured by the debt service coverage requirements for our 22 Exchange loanLakes of Margate (outstanding principal balance of $13.5 million as of March 31, 2017, June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2017. As2019) matures in January 2020. We currently expect to refinance all or a result,portion of this maturing indebtedness on or before its scheduled maturity. However, if we expectare unable to refinance the lenderoutstanding indebtedness at favorable terms, we will look to begin sweepingrepay the outstanding balance with available cash and/or proceeds from operations; however, the loan is not in default.selective asset sales.

 

One of our principal short-term and long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt.  The following table provides information with respect to the contractual maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our indebtedness as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017. The table information is based on initial scheduled maturity dates and does not reflect the exercise of any extension options2019 (dollars in thousands):

  Remainder of                   
  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  Thereafter  Total 
Principal maturities(1) $550 $46,808 $24,308 $13,771 $404  $17,441 $103,282 
Interest payments  1,219  3,306  1,581   786   704   967   8,563 
Total $1,769 $50,114 $25,889 $14,557 $1,108  $18,408 $111,845 

(1)  Does not include approximately $0.1 million of unamortized premium related to debt we assumed on our acquisition of Parkside..

 

 2819 

 

Contractual Obligations 2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  Thereafter  Total 
Mortgage Payable $417  $13,924  $13,443  $1,468  $2,122  $181,849  $213,223 
Interest Payments  4,748   8,648   8,303   7,934   7,864   15,746   53,243 
                             
Total Contractual Obligations $5,165  $22,572  $21,746  $9,402  $9,986  $197,595  $266,466 

 

Results of Operations

 

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, we had seveneight real estate investments six of which were(four wholly owned properties and four properties consolidated through investments in joint ventures. ventures) and one real estate-related investment (mezzanine loan). 

On February 14, 2019, we acquired the Valley Ranch Apartments (the “2019 Acquisition”) and on November 27, 2018 we acquired the Axis at Westmont (the “2018 Acquisition” and collectively, the “Acquisitions”). Additionally, on January 4, 2019 we received proceeds of approximately $10.9 million representing the minimum amount payable for our participation in the residual interests of our equity method investment in Prospect Park. Any additional amounts received will be recognized upon receipt.

On December 28, 2018, we disposed of 22 Exchange (the “Disposition”) and the disposition of this property did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since it did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on our operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of this property are reflected in our results from continuing operations for all periods presented through its date of disposition.

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2018, we had eight real estate investments, seven of which were consolidated (one wholly owned property and six properties consolidated through investments in joint ventures). We sold the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel on August 15, 2017 and Lakewood Flats on August 16, 2016.our equity method investment in Prospect Park. 

 

Our results of operations for the respective periods presented reflect decreasesincreases in most categories principally resulting from our dispositions of Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel in August 2017 (the “2017 Disposition”)acquisition and Lakewood Flats in August 2016 (the “2016 Disposition” and together withdisposition activities. The increases from the 2017 Disposition,Acquisitions are partially offset by the “Dispositions”).decrease resulting from the Disposition. Properties owned by us during the entire periods presented are referred to as our “Same Store” properties.

The disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations since the disposition did not represent a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel are reflected in the Company’s results from continuing operations for all periods presented through its respective date of disposition.

 

Three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2018.

 

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 (dollars in thousands):

 

 Three Months Ended September 30, Change Change due to Change due to  Three Months Ended       Change Change Change 
Description 2017 2016 Amount Percentage  
Disposition(1)
 Same Store(2) 
 June 30,  Increase/  Percentage  due to  due to  due to 
 2019  2018  (Decrease)  Change  Acquisitions(1)  Dispositions(2)  Same Store(3) 
               
Rental revenues $6,122  $6,740  $(618) $(9)% $(843) $225  $9,511  $6,713  $2,798   42.0% $3,018  $(596) $376 
Hotel revenues  2,653   4,653   (2,000)  (43.0)%  (2,000)  - 
Property operating expenses  2,697   2,635   62   2.4%  (202)  264   3,083   2,506   577   23.0%  894   (297)  (20)
Hotel operating expenses  1,921   3,509   (1,588)  (45.3)%  (1,588)  - 
Interest expense, net  1,601   1,561   40   2.6%  60   (20)
Real estate taxes  1,090   1,197   (107)  (8.9)%  (241)  134   1,242   1,107   135   12.0%  272   (183)  46 
Property management fees  285   374   (89)  (23.8)%  (80)  (9)
Asset management fees(3)  426   554   (128)  (23.1)%  (39)  (89)
General and administrative  863   705   158   22.4%  -   158   1,661   1,367   294   22.0%  (8)  9   293 
Depreciation and amortization  2,353   2,616   (263)  (10.1)%  (355)  92   3,349   2,389   960   40.0%  1,409   (280)  (169)
Interest expense, net  2,272   1,362   910   67.0%  918   (436)  428 
Gain on sale of real estate  -   60   (60)  (100.0)%  -   (60)  - 

 

 

 

(1)Represents the amount of decreaseeffect on our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared toperiods indicated resulting from our 2018 acquisition of the three months ended September 30, 2016 as a resultAxis at Westmont and our 2019 acquisition of our dispositions of Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel in August 2017 andLakewood Flats in August 2016.the Valley Ranch Apartments.
(2)Represents the effect on our results for the periods indicated principally resulting from our 2018 disposition of 22 Exchange.
(3)Represents the change for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016same period in 2018 for real estate and real estate-related investments owned by us during the entire periods presented excluding any we have classified as held(“Same Store”). Our results for sale. Same Store properties for the periodsthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016 includes the operating results of2018 include Gardens Medical Pavilion, River Club and the Townhomes at River Club, Lakes of Margate, Arbors Harbor Town, 22 ExchangeParkside and Parkside.
(3)Asset management fees payable to the external advisor are an obligation of the Company, and as such, asset management fees associated with all investments owned during the period are classified in continuing operations. Therefore, the amounts above include asset management fees associated with any property owned during a particular period, including those related to our disposed properties.Flats at Fishers.

 

 2920 

 

 

The following table reflects total rental and hotel revenues and total property and hotel operating expenses for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 for: (i) our Same Store properties and (ii) the DispositionsAcquisitions and (iii) the Disposition (dollars in thousands):

 

  Three Months Ended September 30,   
Description 2017  2016  Change 
Revenues:         
Same store $6,122  $5,897  $225 
Disposition  2,653   5,496   (2,843)
Total revenues $8,775  $11,393  $(2,618)
             
Property and hotel operating expenses:            
Same store $2,697  $2,433  $264 
Disposition  1,921   3,711   (1,790)
Total property and hotel operating expenses $4,618  $6,144  $(1,526)
  Three Months Ended June 30,    
Description 2019  2018  Change 
Rental Revenues:            
Same Store $6,493  $6,117  $376 
Acquisitions  3,018   -   3,018 
Disposition  -   596   (596)
Total rental revenues $9,511  $6,713  $2,798 
             
Property operating expenses:            
Same Store $2,189  $2,209  $(20)
Acquisitions  894   -   894 
Disposition  -   297   (297)
Total property and hotel operating expenses $3,083  $2,506  $577 

 

The tables below reflect occupancy and effective monthly rental rates for our Same Store operating properties:properties owned as of June 30, 2019:

 

 Occupancy (%)  Effective Monthly Rent per
Square Foot/Unit/Bed ($)(1)
    Occupancy  Effective Monthly Rent per
Square Foot/Unit/Bed(1)
   
 As of September 30,  As of September 30,    As of June 30,  As of June 30,   
Property 2017  2016  2017  2016    2019  2018  2019  2018   
Gardens Medical Pavilion  74%  66% $2.26  $2.08  per sq. ft.  76%  70% $2.28  $2.09  per sq. ft.
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club  96%  99%  413.91   408.06  per bed  90%  95%  464.06   420.33  per bed
Lakes of Margate  89%  95%  1,283.22   1,256.74  per unit  95%  93%  1,345.28   1,342.40  per unit
Arbors Harbor Town  94%  94%  1,241.43   1,208.90  per unit  93%  91%  1,224.27   1,265.47  per unit
22 Exchange  80%  90%  571.49   499.45  per bed
Parkside  95%  93%  1,143.29   1,125.63  per unit  94%  92%  1,105.72   1,173.98  per unit
Flats at Fishers  95%  90%  1,053.00   944.10  per unit
Axis at Westmont (2)  93%  N/A   1,120.83   N/A  per unit
Valley Ranch Apratments (3)  95%  N/A   1,357.52   N/A  per unit

 

 

(1)Effective monthly rent is calculated as in-place contracted monthly rental revenue, including any premiums due for short-term or month-to-month leases, less any concessions or discounts.

(2)The Axis at Westmont was acquired on November 27, 2018.

(3)The Valley Ranch Apartments was acquired on February 14, 2019.

 

Revenues.  Rental revenues for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $6.1$9.5 million, a decreasean increase of $0.6$2.8 million, compared to $6.7 million the same period in 2016.  Excluding the effect of the 2016 Disposition, our rental revenues increased slightly by $0.2 million for our Same Store properties.

Hotel revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017 were $2.7 million, a decrease of $2.0 million, compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2016.2018.  Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities, our rental revenues increased by $0.4 million for our Same Store properties. The changeincrease in rental revenues for our hotel revenuesSame Store Properties was generally attributable to higher occupancy at our Same Store properties during the 2017 Disposition.2019 period, particularly at Flats at Fishers ($0.2 million of the total increase).

 

Property Operating Expenses.    Property operating expenses for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $2.7$3.1 million, an increase of $0.6 million, compared to $2.5 million for the same period in 2018. Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities, our property operating expenses were relatively flat for our Same Store properties.

21

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2019 were $1.2 million, an increase of $0.1 million, compared to $2.6$1.1 million for the same period in 2016. Excluding2018 as the effect ofdecrease resulting from the 2016 Disposition our property operating expenses increasedwas substantially offset by $0.3 million for our Same Store properties.increases resulting from the Acquisitions.

Hotel Operating Expenses.  Hotel operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 were $1.9 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, compared to $3.5 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease in hotel operating expenses was due to the aforementioned disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel on August 15, 2017.

Interest Expense, net.  Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was unchanged at $1.6 million.

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2017 were $1.1 million, a slight decrease of $0.1 million, compared to $1.2 million for the same period in 2016.

30

Property Management Fees.   Property management fees, which are based on revenues, were $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and were comprised of property management fees paid to unaffiliated third parties and our property manager.

Asset Management Fees.   Asset management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and were comprised of asset management fees paid to our external advisor and third parties with respect to our investments. Asset management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2016 include fees related to the Dispositions of less than $0.1 million.

General and Administrative Expenses.   General and administrative expenses which increased slightly by $0.2 million duringfor the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $1.7 million, an increase of $0.3 million, compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2016,2018. The increase is principally attributable to higher asset management fees during the 2019 period resulting from our acquisition activities. General and administrative expenses primarily consists of audit fees, legal fees, board of directors’ fees, and other administrative expenses.expenses, including certain costs paid to our advisor (see Note 10 of the financial statements).

 

Depreciation and Amortization.   Depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.3 million duringexpense for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 was $3.3 million, an increase of $0.9 million, compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2016.2018. Excluding the effect of the Dispositions, our acquisition and disposition activities, depreciation and amortization increaseddecreased slightly by $0.1$0.2 million for our Same Store properties.

 

Gain on SaleInterest Expense, net.  Interest expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $2.3 million, an increase of Real Estate.   On August 15, 2017, we sold$0.9 million, compared to $1.4 million for the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel for a contractual sales pricesame period in 2018. Excluding the effect of approximately $62.0 million, resulting in a third quarter gain on sale of real estate of $20.9 million. Additionally, we recognized aour acquisition and disposition activities, interest expense, net increased by $0.4 million gainfor our Same Store properties. The change in our interest expense, net for our Same Store properties reflects increases in (i) our weighted average outstanding notes payable balance resulting from our financing activities and (ii) the weighted average interest rate on sale of real estateour indebtedness during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to escrow reimbursements received from the Lakewood Flats outstanding insurance claim. On August 16, 2016, we sold Lakewood Flats for a contract sales price of approximately $68.8 million, resulting in a gain on sale of real estate of $11.5 million and a deferred gain of approximately $1.2 million. The deferred gain represented the amount of monies held in escrow to be reimbursed upon completion of the property’s outstanding insurance claim. The remaining deferred gain escrow balance as of September 30, 2017 was approximately $0.6 million.2019 period.

31

 

Interest Income, net.  Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.4 million, an increase of $0.2 million, compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2018, which represents the interest earned on our note receivable which was entered into on February 28, 2019 (see Note 4 of the financial statements).

NineSix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2018.

 

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 (dollars in thousands):

 

 Nine Months Ended September 30, Change     Six Months Ended       Change Change Change 
Description 2017 2016 Amount Percentage Change due to
Disposition(1)
 Change due to
Same Store(2)
 
 June 30,  Increase/  Percentage  due to  due to  due to 
 2018  2017  (Decrease)  Change  Acquisitions(1)  Dispositions(2)  Same Store(3) 
               
Rental revenues $18,345  $21,590  $(3,245)  (15)% $(4,084) $839  $18,044  $13,312  $4,732   36.0% $5,288  $(1,312) $756 
Hotel revenues  13,207   13,946   (739)  (5.3)%  (739)  - 
Property operating expenses  6,758   7,128   (370)  (5.2)%  (867)  497   5,872   5,097   775   15.0%  1,566   (638)  (153)
Hotel operating expenses  9,167   10,219   (1,052)  (10.3)%  (1,052)  - 
Interest expense, net  4,843   4,692   151   3.2%  45   106 
Real estate taxes  3,315   4,113   (798)  (19.4)%  (997)  199   2,432   2,205   227   10.0%  505   (367)  89 
Property management fees  1,043   1,164   (121)  (10.4)%  (144)  23 
Asset management fees(3)  1,445   1,773   (328)  (18.5)%  (14)  (314)
General and administrative  2,624   2,246   378   16.8%  -   378   3,144   2,812   332   12.0%  15   (107)  424 
Depreciation and amortization  7,499   8,396   (897)  (10.7)%  (950)  53   6,449   4,818   1,631   34.0%  2,571   (576)  (364)
Interest expense, net  4,259   2,686   1,573   59.0%  1,602   (867)  838 
Gain on sale of real estate  -   307   (307)  (100.0)%  -   (307)  - 

 

 

 

(1)Represents the amount of decreaseeffect on our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared toperiods indicated resulting from our 2018 acquisition of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a resultAxis at Westmont and our 2019 acquisition of our Dispositions.the Valley Ranch Apartments.
(2)Represents the effect on our results for the periods indicated principally resulting from our 2018 disposition of 22 Exchange.
(3)Represents the change for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016same period in 2018 for real estate and real estate-related investments owned by us during the entire periods presented excluding any we have classified as held(“Same Store”). Our results for sale. Same Store properties for the periodssix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016 includes the operating results of2018 include Gardens Medical Pavilion, River Club and the Townhomes at River Club, Lakes of Margate, Arbors Harbor Town, 22 ExchangeParkside and Parkside.
(3)Asset management fees payable to the external advisor are an obligation of the Company, and as such, asset management fees associated with all investments owned during the period are classified in continuing operations. Therefore, the amounts above include asset management fees associated with any property owned during a particular period, including those related to our disposed properties.Flats at Fishers.

 

 3222 

 

 

The following table reflects total rental and hotel revenues and total property and hotel operating expenses for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 for: (i) our Same Store properties (ii) the Acquisitions and (ii) our Dispositions(iii) the Disposition (dollars in thousands):

 

  Nine Months Ended September 30,   
Description 2017  2016  Change 
Revenues:         
Same store $18,345  $17,506  $839 
Disposition  13,207   18,030   (4,823)
Total revenues $31,552  $35,536  $(3,984)
             
Property and hotel operating expenses:            
Same store $6,758  $6,261  $497 
Disposition  9,167   11,086   (1,919)
Total property and hotel operating expenses $15,925  $17,347  $(1,422)

  Six Months Ended June 30,    
Description 2019  2018  Change 
Rental Revenues:            
Same Store $12,756  $12,000  $756 
Acquisitions  5,288   -   5,288 
Disposition  -   1,312   (1,312)
Total rental revenues $18,044  $13,312  $4,732 
             
Property operating expenses:            
Same Store $4,306  $4,459  $(153)
Acquisitions  1,566   -   1,566 
Disposition  -   638   (638)
Total property and hotel operating expenses $5,872  $5,097  $775 

 

The tables below reflect occupancy and effective monthly rental rates for our Same Store operating properties:properties owned as of June 30, 2019:

 

 Occupancy (%)  Effective Monthly Rent per
Square Foot/Unit/Bed ($)(1)
    Occupancy  Effective Monthly Rent per
Square Foot/Unit/Bed(1)
   
 As of September 30,  As of September 30,    As of June 30,  As of June 30,   
Property 2017  2016  2017  2016    2019  2018  2019  2018   
Gardens Medical Pavilion  74%  66% $2.26  $2.08  per sq. ft.  76%  70% $2.28  $2.09  per sq. ft.
River Club and the Townhomes at River Club  96%  99%  413.91   408.06  per bed  90%  95%  464.06   420.33  per bed
Lakes of Margate  89%  95%  1,283.22   1,256.74  per unit  95%  93%  1,345.28   1,342.40  per unit
Arbors Harbor Town  94%  94%  1,241.43   1,208.90  per unit  93%  91%  1,224.27   1,265.47  per unit
22 Exchange  80%  90%  571.49   499.45  per bed
Parkside  95%  93%  1,143.29   1,125.63  per unit  94%  92%  1,105.72   1,173.98  per unit
Flats at Fishers  95%  90%  1,053.00   944.10  per unit
Axis at Westmont (2)  93%  N/A   1,120.83   N/A  per unit
Valley Ranch Apratments (3)  95%  N/A   1,357.52   N/A  per unit

 

 

(1)Effective monthly rent is calculated as in-place contracted monthly rental revenue, including any premiums due for short-term or month-to-month leases, less any concessions or discounts.

(2)The Axis at Westmont was acquired on November 27, 2018

(3)The Valley Ranch Apartments was acquired on February 14, 2019

 

Revenues.  Rental revenues for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $18.3$18.0 million, a decreasean increase of $3.3$4.7 million, compared to $21.6$13.3 million for the same period in 2016.2018.  Excluding the effect of the Dispositions,our acquisition and disposition activities, our rental revenues increased by $0.8 million for our Same Store properties.

Hotel The increase in rental revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $13.2 million, a decrease of $0.7 million, compared to $13.9 million for the same period in 2016. The change in our hotel revenuesSame Store Properties was generally attributable to higher occupancy at our Same Store properties during the 2017 Disposition.2019 period, particularly at Flats at Fishers ($0.5 million of the total increase).

Property Operating Expenses.    Property operating expenses for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $6.8$5.9 million, a decreasean increase of $0.3$0.8 million, compared to $ 7.1$5.1 million for the same period in 2016.2018. Excluding the effect of our 2016 Disposition,acquisition and disposition activities, our property operating expenses increaseddecreased slightly by $0.5$0.2 million for our Same Store properties.

.

Hotel Operating Expenses.  Hotel operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $9.2 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, compared to $10.2 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease in hotel operating expenses was due to the aforementioned disposition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel on August 15, 2017.

Interest Expense, net.  Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $4.8 million, an increase of $0.1 million, compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2016. Excluding the effect of the Dispositions, our interest expense increased slightly by $0.1 million.

33

Real Estate Taxes.  Real estate taxes for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $3.3$2.4 million, a decreasean increase of $0.8$0.2 million, compared to $4.1$2.2 million for the same period in 2016. Excluding2018 as the effect ofdecrease resulting from the Dispositions, our real estate taxes slightly increasedDisposition was substantially offset by $0.2 million for our Same Store properties.increases resulting from the Acquisitions.

23

Property Management Fees.   Property management fees, which are based on revenues, were $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $1.2 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, and were comprised of property management fees paid to unaffiliated third parties and our property manager.

Asset Management Fees.   Asset management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and were comprised of asset management fees paid to our external advisor and third parties with respect to our investments. Asset management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 include fees related to the Dispositions of less than $0.1 million.

General and Administrative Expenses.   General and administrative expenses which increased by $0.4 million duringfor the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 were $3.1 million, an increase of $0.3 million, compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2016,2018. The increase is principally attributable to higher asset management fees during the 2019 period resulting from our acquisition activities. General and administrative expenses primarily consists of audit fees, legal fees, board of directors’ fees, and other administrative expenses.expenses, including certain costs paid to our advisor (see Note 10 of the financial statements).

 

Depreciation and Amortization.   Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $7.5$6.4 million, a decreasean increase of $0.9$1.6 million, compared to $8.4$4.8 million for the same period in 2016.2018. Excluding the effect of the Dispositions, our acquisition and disposition activities, depreciation and amortization was relatively constantdecreased by $0.4 million for our Same Store properties.

 

GainInterest Expense, net.  Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $4.3 million, an increase of $1.6 million, compared to $2.7 million for the same period in 2018. Excluding the effect of our acquisition and disposition activities, interest expense increased by $0.8 million for our Same Store properties. The change in our interest expense, net for our Same Store properties reflects increases in (i) our weighted average outstanding notes payable balance resulting from our financing activities and (ii) the weighted average interest rate on Sale of Real Estate.   On August 15, 2017, we sold the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel for a contractual sales price of approximately $62.0 million, resulting in a third quarter gain on sale of real estate of $20.9 million. Additionally, we recognized a $0.7 million gain on sale of real estateour indebtedness during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to escrow reimbursements received from the Lakewood Flats outstanding insurance claim. On August 16, 2016, we sold Lakewood Flats for a contractual sales price of approximately $68.8 million, resulting in a third quarter gain on sale of real estate of approximately $11.5 million and a deferred gain of approximately $1.2 million. The deferred gain represented the amount of monies held in escrow to be reimbursed upon completion of the property’s outstanding insurance claim. The remaining deferred gain escrow balance as of September 30, 2017 was approximately $0.6 million.2019 period.

 

34

Interest Income, net.  Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.7 million, an increase of $0.4 million, compared to $0.3 million for the same period in 2018, which represents the interest earned on our note receivable which was entered into on February 28, 2019 (see Note 4 of the financial statements).

 

Summary of Cash Flows

 

Operating activities

 

NetThe net cash flows provided by operating activities of $4.6$6.5 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 consists of the following:

 

·cash inflows of approximately $4.6$3.9 million from our net incomeloss after adjustment for non-cash items; and

 

·cash outflowsinflows of approximately $0.1$2.6 million associated with the net changes in operating assets and liabilities.

 

Investing activities

 

The net cash provided byused in investing activities of $22.5$61.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 consists primarily of the following:

 

·proceeds of $24.1 million from the dispositionacquisition of the Courtyard Kauai Coconut Beach Hotel; andValley Ranch Apartments for $71.5 million;

·net funding of note receivable of $7.1 million;

 

·capital expenditures of $1.5$3.1 million;

·proceeds of approximately $10.9 million related to our equity method investment in Prospect Park; and

·net proceeds from the sale of marketable securities, available for sale of 9.2 million.

Financing activities

 

The net cash used inprovided by financing activities of $12.9$65.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 consists primarily of the following:

 

·net debt principal payments $3.6of $0.4 million;

 

·paymentnet proceeds from notes payable of loan fees and expenses of $1.5 million;

·aggregate distributions to our noncontrolling interests of $5.5$70.8 million; and

 

·redemptions and cancellation of common stock of $2.4$4.9 million.

 

24

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements and straight-line amortization of intangibles, which implies that the value of a real estate asset diminishes predictably over time. We believe that, because real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including, but not limited to, inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using the historical accounting convention for depreciation and certain other items may be less informative.

 

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial measure that is widely recognized as a measureBecause of REIT operating performance. We use FFO as defined bythese factors, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”("NAREIT"), an industry trade group, has published a standardized measure of performance known as funds from operations ("FFO"), which is used in the April 2002 “White PaperREIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. We believe FFO, which excludes certain items such as real estate-related depreciation and amortization, is an appropriate supplemental measure of Funds From Operations” whicha REIT's operating performance. FFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss),or loss as determined under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

We calculate FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established over time by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as restated in a White Paper approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT effective in December 2018 (the "White Paper"). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP,depreciation and gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairments of depreciableamortization related to real estate, (including impairmentsgains and losses from the sale of certain real estate assets, gains and losses from change in control and impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and partnerships which resulted from measurableentities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the fair value of the depreciable real estate held by the joint venture or partnership), plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures, subsidiaries, and noncontrolling interests as one measure to evaluate our operating performance. In October 2011, NAREIT clarified theentity. Our FFO definition to exclude impairment charges of depreciable real estate (including impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and partnerships which resulted from measurable decreases in the fair value of the depreciable real estate held by the joint venture or partnership).calculation complies with NAREIT's definition.

 

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient. As a result, our management believesWe believe that the use of FFO together with the required GAAP presentations, provides a more complete understanding of our performance.performance to investors and to management and reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP that were put into effect in 2009 subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT's definition of FFO, such as the change to expense as incurred rather than capitalize and depreciate acquisition fees and expenses incurred for business combinations, have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses, as items that are expensed under GAAP across all industries. These changes had a particularly significant impact on publicly registered, non-listed REITs, which typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity in the early part of their existence, particularly during the period when they are raising capital through ongoing initial public offerings.

Because of these factors, the Investment Program Association (the "IPA"), an industry trade group, published a standardized measure of performance known as modified funds from operations ("MFFO"), which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered, non-listed REITs. MFFO is designed to be reflective of the ongoing operating performance of publicly registered, non-listed REITs by adjusting for those costs that are more reflective of acquisitions and investment activity, along with other items the IPA believes are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT, such as straight-lining of rents as required by GAAP. We believe it is appropriate to use MFFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance because we believe that both before and after we have deployed all of our offering proceeds and are no longer incurring a significant amount of acquisition fees or other related costs, it reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA's Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (the "Practice Guideline") issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for acquisition and transaction-related fees and expenses and other items. In calculating MFFO, we follow the Practice Guideline and exclude acquisition and transaction-related fees and expenses (which includes costs incurred in connection with strategic alternatives), amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of market lease and other intangibles, net (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments and borrowings, mark-to-market adjustments included in net income (including gains or losses incurred on assets held for sale), gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis.

 

 3525 

 

 

We believe that, FFObecause MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of acquisition activities and other non-operating items, MFFO can provide, on a going-forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, helpfulthe capacity to investorscontinue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring properties and once our management asportfolio is stabilized. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance because it excludes depreciationby the non-listed REIT industry and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, impairmentsallows for an evaluation of depreciable assets, and extraordinary items, and as a result, when compared year to year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which is not immediately apparent from net income.our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs.

 

Not all REITs, including publicly registered, non-listed REITs, calculate FFO and MFFO the same way. Accordingly, comparisons with other REITs, including publicly registered, non-listed REITs, may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), or income (loss) from continuing operations as determined under GAAP as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, nor as an indicationor indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in connectionconjunction with other GAAP measurements. Additionally,measurements as an indication of our performance. FFO and MFFO should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the exclusioncurrent GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The methods utilized to evaluate the performance of impairments limitsa publicly registered, non-listed REIT under GAAP should be construed as more relevant measures of operational performance and considered more prominently than the usefulnessnon-GAAP measures, FFO and MFFO, and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Neither the SEC, NAREIT, the IPA nor any other regulatory body or industry trade group has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, NAREIT, the IPA or another industry trade group may publish updates to the White Paper or the Practice Guidelines or the SEC or another regulatory body could standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry, and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO as a historical operating performance measure since an impairment charge indicates that operating performance has been permanently affected. FFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO. Our FFO as presented may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs that do not define these terms in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the definition differently.MFFO accordingly.

 

Our calculationcalculations of FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 isMFFO are presented below (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  For the Three Months Ended September 30,  For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Net income $20,537  $9,324  $18,269  $7,131 
FFO adjustments:                
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets  2,353   2,616   7,499   8,396 
Gain on sale of real estate and other assets, net  (21,336)  (11,462)  (21,619)  (11,462)
Income tax benefit associated with real estate sale(1)  (1,592)  (29)  (1,592)  (29)
FFO  (38)  449   2,557   4,036 
                 
Net income $20,537  $9,324  $18,269  $7,131 
Less: income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (4,430)  59   (4,557)  14 
Net income applicable to Company's common shares $16,107  $9,383  $13,712  $7,145 
Net income per common share, basic and diluted $0.65  $0.37  $0.55  $0.28 
                 
FFO $(38) $449  $2,557  $4,036 
Less: FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests  (67)  (244)  (833)  (916)
FFO attributable to Company's common shares $(105) $205  $1,724  $3,120 
FFO per common share, basic and diluted $(0.00) $0.01  $0.07  $0.12 
                 
Weighted average number of common shares                
outstanding, basic and diluted  24,899   25,391   25,031   25,470 
  For the Three Months Ended
June 30,
  For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Description 2019  2018  2019  2018 
Net loss $(1,418) $(1,690) $(3,124) $(3,495)
FFO adjustments:                
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets  3,349   2,389   6,449   4,818 
Gain on sale of real estate  -   (60)  -   (307)
FFO  1,931   639   3,325   1,016 
MFFO adjustments:                
Other adjustments:                
Acquisition and other transaction related costs expensed(1)  10   5   10   16 
Noncash adjustments:                
Amortization of above or below market leases and liabilities(2)  (19)  (3)  (38)  (6)
Non-recurring (loss)/gain from extinguishment/sale of debt, derivatives or securities holdings(3)  2   (2)  54   (2)
Accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments(4)  -   (28)  -   (70)
MFFO before straight-line rent  1,924   611   3,351   954 
Straight-line rent(5)  3   (9)  3   (11)
MFFO - IPA recommended format(6) $1,927  $602  $3,354  $943 
                 
Net loss $(1,418) $(1,690) $(3,124) $(3,495)
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests  3   117   16   90 
Net loss applicable to Company's common shares $(1,415) $(1,573) $(3,108) $(3,405)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted $(0.06) $(0.06) $(0.13) $(0.14)
                 
FFO $1,931  $639  $3,325  $1,016 
Less: FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests  (168)  (176)  (324)  (324)
FFO attributable to Company's common shares $1,763  $463  $3,001  $692 
FFO per common share, basic and diluted $0.08  $0.02  $0.13  $0.03 
                 
MFFO - IPA recommended format $1,927  $602  $3,354  $943 
Less: MFFO attributable to noncontrolling interests  (165)  (171)  (317)  (314)
MFFO attributable to company's common shares $1,762  $431  $3,037  $629 
                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted  23,219   24,515   23,286   24,561 

26

 

(1)1)During 2015, we recordedThe purchase of properties, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan to generate operational income and cash flows in order to make distributions to investors. In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income and income from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. Such fees and expenses are paid in cash, and therefore such funds will not be available to distribute to investors. Such fees and expenses negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which properties are being acquired. Therefore, MFFO may not be an aggregate provisionaccurate indicator of our operating performance, especially during periods in which properties are being acquired. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for income taxfuture distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of approximately $2.7 million representing estimated foreign income tax dueproperties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property. Acquisition fees and expenses will not be paid or reimbursed, as a result ofapplicable, to our advisor even if there are no further proceeds from the sale of two foreignshares in our offering, and therefore such fees and expenses would need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties or from ancillary cash flows.
2)Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed at least annually for impairment, and certain intangibles are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges relating to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.
3)Management believes that adjusting for gains or losses related to extinguishment/sale of debt, derivatives or securities holdings is appropriate because they are items that may not be reflective of ongoing operations. By excluding these items, management believes that MFFO provides supplemental information related to sustainable operations that will be more comparable between other reporting periods.
4)Management believes that adjusting for mark-to-market adjustments is appropriate because they are nonrecurring items that may not be reflective of ongoing operations and reflects unrealized impacts on value based only on then current market conditions, although they may be based upon current operational issues related to an individual property or industry or general market conditions. Mark-to-market adjustments are made for items such as ineffective derivative instruments, certain marketable securities and any other items that GAAP requires we make a mark-to-market adjustment for. The need to reflect mark-to-market adjustments is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly and/or annual basis in accordance with GAAP.
5)Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using various methodologies. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, Alte Jakobstraße (“AJS”)providing insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and Holstenplatz. Duringdebt investments, and aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance.
6)Our MFFO results include certain unusual items as set forth in the third quartertable below. We believe it is helpful to our investors in understanding our operating results to both highlight them and present adjusted MFFO excluding their impact (as shown below).

  For the
Three Months
Ended
  For the
Six Months
Ended
 
  June 30, 2018  June 30, 2018 
Default interest expense(a) $239  $476 
Allocations to noncontrolling interests  (24)  (48)
Total after allocations to noncontrolling interests $215  $428 

(a)Represents the accrual of 2017,default interest expense on our non-recourse mortgage loan which was collateralized by 22 Exchange. Although the lender for 22 Exchange did not charge us and was not paid interest at the stated default rate, we recorded an aggregate income tax benefitaccrued interest at the default rate pursuant to the terms of approximately $1.6 million consistingthe respective loan agreement. On December 28, 2018, we and the 10.0% noncontrolling member relinquished our ownership of (i)22 Exchange through a refunddeed-in-lieu of foreign income tax of approximately $0.8 million and (ii)foreclosure transaction with the reversal of our previously estimated taxes payable on these sales of $0.8 million.lender.

 

Cash flows generatedExcluding the impact of this unusual item from FFO may be usedour MFFO, after taking into consideration allocations to fund all or a portion of certain capitalizable items that are excluded from FFO, such as capital expendituresnoncontrolling interests, our adjusted MFFO attributable to Company's common shares would have been $646 and payments of principal on debt, each of which may impact$1,057, for the amount of cash available for special distributions to our stockholders.three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

 

 3627 

 

  

Distributions

 

U.S. federal tax law requires a REIT distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. In order to continue to qualify for REIT status, we may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available. Distributions are authorized at the discretion of our board of directors based on its analysis of our performance over the previous periods and expectations of performance for future periods. These analyses may include actual and anticipated operating cash flow, changes in market capitalization rates for investments suitable for our portfolio, capital expenditure needs, general financial and market conditions, proceeds from asset sales, and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. The board of director’s decisions will be substantially influenced by the obligation to ensure that we maintain our federal tax status as a REIT. We cannot provide assurance that we will pay distributions at any particular level, or at all.

 

28

On November 20, 2015, our board of directors authorized a special cash distribution of $1.50 per share of common stock, payable to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2015. The Company paid this special cash distribution which aggregated $38.4 million on January 5, 2016. This special cash distribution represented a portion of proceeds received from previous asset sales.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates, including investment impairment.  These estimates include such items as impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and amortization, and allowance for doubtful accounts.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

OurOther than as disclosed in Note 2 to the financial statements, our critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed significantly from the discussion found in the Management Discussion and Analysis and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2017.April 1, 2019.

 

 3729 

 

 

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

The Euro was the functional currency for the operations of Alte Jakobstraße (“AJS”) and Holstenplatz, which were both sold in 2015. As a result of the sale of AJS and Holstenplatz, we no longer have foreign operations. However, we still maintain a Euro-denominated bank account that is comprised primarily of the remaining undistributed proceeds from the sale of these properties, which we translate into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at each reporting period. As of September 30, 2017, we maintained approximately $5.2 million in Euro-denominated accounts.

Interest Rate Risk

We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire properties and make loans and other permitted investments.  Our management’s objectives, with regard to interest rate risks, are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs.  To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates.  With regard to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.  We may enter into derivative financial instruments such as options, forwards, interest rate swaps, caps, or floors to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or to effectively lock the interest rate portion of our variable rate debt.  However, all of our outstanding notes payable of $103.4 million, excluding deferred financing fees, as of September 30, 2017 were subject to fixed interest rates. 

38Item 4.Controls and Procedures.

Item 4.   Controls and Procedures.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) using the criteria established inInternal Control-New Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in this report is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

We believe, however, that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or error, if any, within a company have been detected.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 3930 

 

 

PART II

 

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.      Legal Proceedings.

Item 1.Legal Proceedings.

 

We are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors.

 

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 2.      Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

During the period covered by this quarterly report, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

Share Redemption Program

 

Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that permits stockholders to sell their shares back to us, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. Our board of directors can amend the provisions of our share redemption program at any time without the approval of our stockholders.

 

From our inception through December 31, 2018, we had redeemed 3.3 million shares of our common stock at an average price per share of $6.97 per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we repurchased 621,494 shares of common stock for $7.83 per share, pursuant to our share repurchase program.

The terms on which we redeemredeemed shares may differprior to July 1, 2018 differed between redemptions upon a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” (as defined in the share redemption program) or confinement to a long-term care facility (collectively, Exceptional Redemptions) and all other redemptions or Ordinary Redemptions.

 

Any shares approved for redemption will be redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from timePrior to time by our board of directors, and no less frequently than annually.  We will not redeem, during any 12-month period, more than 5% ofJuly 1, 2018, the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption.  In addition, the cash available for redemptions is limited to no more than $10 million in any twelve-month period.  The redemption limitations apply to all redemptions, whether Ordinary or Exceptional Redemptions.

The per share redemption price for Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions iswas equal to the lesser of 80% and 90%, respectively, of (i) the then current estimated NAV per share valueShare and (ii) the average price per share the investor paid for all of his shares (as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock) less the Special Distributions (as defined in the share redemption program).

 

Effective November 18, 2016, our estimated value per share was $7.80. For a full description of the methodologies used to estimate the value of our common stock as of October 31, 2016, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities-Market Information” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Notwithstanding the redemption prices set forth above,On August 9, 2017, our board of directors may determine, whether pursuantadopted a Fourth Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Amended Share Redemption Program”) to formulasbe effective July 1, 2018. Under the Amended Share Redemption Program, beginning July 1, 2018, we will no longer process redemptions upon death, “qualifying disability,” or processesconfinement to a long-term care facility on terms different than those on which we process all other redemptions. Additionally, the price at which we will redeem shares submitted for redemption will be a percentage of the estimated NAV per Share as of the Effective Date (as defined in the Amended Share Redemption Program), as follows:

For Redemptions with an Effective Date Between
July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019:92.5% of the estimated NAV per Share
July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020:95.0% of the estimated NAV per Share
July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021:97.5% of the estimated NAV per Share
Thereafter:100% of the estimated NAV per Share

Pursuant to the terms of the Fourth Amended Share Redemption Program, any shares approved or setfor redemption are redeemed on a periodic basis as determined from time to time by our board of directors, the redemption priceand no less frequently than annually.  We will not redeem, during any twelve-month period, more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares which may differ between Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions; provided, however, that we must provide at least 30 days’ noticeoutstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to stockholders before applying this new price determined by our boardthe date of directors.

redemption.  In addition, the cash available for redemptions is limited to no more than $10.0 million in any twelve-month period.  Any redemption requests are honored pro rata among all requests received based on funds available and are not honored on a first come, first served basis. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017,

On December 28, 2018, our board of directors approved all Ordinaryadopted a Fifth Amended and Restated Share Redemption requests receivedProgram (the “Fifth Amended Share Redemption Program”) which became effective on January 31, 2019. The only material change to the program was to change the measurement period for the limitations on the number and dollar amount of shares that complied with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the sharemay be accepted for redemption program for an aggregate of 223,105 shares redeemed for approximately $1.1 million (approximately $5.14 per share). During the quarter ended September 30, 2017,from a rolling 12 month-period to a calendar year. On March 26, 2019, our board of directors set the cash available for redemptions at $2.5 million for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019. On April 15, 2019, the Company redeemed all Exceptional Redemption requests received that complied withapproximately 0.3 million shares of our common stock, for quarterly period ended December 31, 2018, for approximately $2.4 million. On May 9, 2019, our board of directors set the applicable requirements and guidelinescash available for redemptions at $2.5 million per quarter, for each of the share redemption programquarterly periods ending June 30, 2019, September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2019. On May 31, 2019, the Company redeemed approximately 0.3 million shares of our common stock, for an aggregate of 15,869 shares redeemedquarterly period ended March 31, 2018, for $91,992 (approximately $5.80 per share). All redemptions were funded with cash on hand.approximately $2.5 million.

 

 4031 

 

 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, we redeemed shares as follows (including both Ordinary Redemptions and Exceptional Redemptions):

2017 Total Number of
Shares Redeemed
  Average Price
Paid Per Share
  Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  Maximum
Number of Shares
That May Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
 
July    $        
August  238,974       238,974   (1)
September             
   238,974  $5.19   238,974     

(1)A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our redemption program is included in the narrative preceding this table.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

None.

 

Item5.Other Information.

 

None. The Company is providing the following disclosure in lieu of providing this information in a current report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.07, “Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.”

On August 8, 2019, the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders. According to the inspector of elections, a total of 12,034,557 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and entitled to vote were represented at the meeting in person or by proxy, representing approximately 53% of the total number of shares entitled to vote at the meeting. The voting results, as certified by the inspector of elections, are as follows:

Proposal 1 - Election of Directors.

The Company’s stockholders elected seven directors of the Company to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Stockholders voted as follows:

Nominee For  Withheld  Broker Non-Votes 
Andreas K. Bremer 9,800,973  659,993  1,573,591 
Diane S. Detering-Paddison 9,821,116  639,850  1,573,591 
Jeffrey F. Joseph 9,709,531  751,435  1,573,591 
David Lichtenstein 9,794,028  666,938  1,573,591 
Jeffrey P. Mayer 9,798,950  662,016  1,573,591 
Cynthia Pharr Lee 9,733,585  727,381  1,573,591 
Steven Spinola 9,769,152  691,814  1,573,591 

Proposal 2 - Ratification of Selection of Auditors.

The stockholders ratified the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019. Stockholders voted as follows:

For  Against  Abstain  Broker Non-Votes
 11,422,511    224,910    387,136   n/a 

 

Item 6.Exhibits.

 

The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

 

 4132 

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST V, INC.

 INVESTMENT TRUST V, INC.
Date: August 14, 2019(FORMERLY BEHRINGER HARVARD
By:  OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.)/s/ Mitchell C. Hochberg
  
Dated: November 14, 2017By:/s/ Donna BrandinMitchell C. Hochberg
  Donna BrandinChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: August 14, 2019By:  /s/ Seth Molod
Seth Molod
  Chief Financial Officer
  (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officerand Accounting Officer)

 

 4233 

 

 

Index to Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number Description
3.110.1* Third ArticlesRenewal Agreement (Advisory Management Agreement) among Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc., Lightstone Value Plus REIT V OP LP and LSG-BH II Advisor LLC effective as of Amendment and Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2012)June 10, 2019.
3.2Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended by Amendment No. 1.  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2013)
3.3Articles of Amendment (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 24, 2017)
4.1Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2013)
10.1Reinstatement and Second Amendment to Contract of Sale between 7425 La Vista LLC and DFW Lakewood Flats Apartments LLC dated July 22, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2016)
10.2Fifth Amended and Restated Advisory Management Agreement between Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and Behringer Harvard Opportunity Advisors II, LLC dated July 25, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2016)
10.310.2* Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Property Management and Leasing Agreement by and among Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II, LP, and several affiliated special purpose entities and Behringer Harvard Opportunity Management Services, LLC and Behringer Harvard Real Estate Services, LLC dated July 25, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2016)
10.4Termination of Advisory Management Agreement among Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., Behringer Harvard Opportunity Advisors II, LLC, and Stratera Services, LLC effective as of February 10, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.5Termination of Property Management and Leasing Agreement among Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II, LP and several affiliated special purpose entities, Behringer Harvard Opportunity Management Services, LLC, and Behringer Harvard Real Estate Services, LLC, and Stratera Services, LLC effective as of February 10, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.6Advisory Management Agreement among Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II, LP and LSG-BH II Advisor LLC (“LSG-BH II Advisor”) effective as of February 10, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.7Advisory Agreement among Behringer Harvard OpportunityLightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust V, Inc., Lightstone Value Plus REIT II, Inc., Behringer Harvard OpportunityV OP II, LP and LSG Development Advisor LLC (“LSG-BH II Advisor”) effective as of February 10, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.8Property Management and Leasing Agreement among Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc., Behringer Harvard Opportunity OP II, LP and several affiliated special purpose entities, and LSG-BH II Property Manager LLC effective as of February 10, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2017)
10.9Loan Agreement dated May 8, 2017 with TH Commercial Mortgage LLC (previously filed in and incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2017)
10.10

Purchase and Sale Agreement among Kauai Coconut Beach, LLC and Kauai Coconut Beach Operator, LLC, as seller, and KS, LLC, as purchaser, effective as of June 19, 2017 (previously filed in and incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2017)

14.0Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (previously filed in and incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2017)
99.1Third Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. adopted as of May 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2014)10, 2019.
31.1* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
31.2* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
32.1* Section 1350 Certification**
32.2* Section 1350 Certification**
101* 

The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, filed on NovemberAugust 14, 2017,2019, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

*Filed or furnished herewith
**In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.  Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

 4334