UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

~~(x) QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE~~

~~SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.~~

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2008~~2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

~~( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)~~

~~OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.~~

Commission File Number 1-10485

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE		75-2303920
(State or other jurisdiction of	~~(I.R.S. employer~~
incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

5949 SHERRY LANE, SUITE 1400

DALLAS, TEXAS

75225

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip code)

(972) 713-3700

(~~Registrant's~~Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ~~[X]~~þ No ~~[ ]~~o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated ~~filer or a small reporting company.~~filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

~~Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [ ]~~

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer þ

Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes ~~[ ]~~o No ~~[X]~~

The number of shares of common stock of registrant outstanding on October ~~23, 2008~~26, 2009 was ~~36,330,337.~~34,979,831.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)


	Three months ended					Nine months ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Revenues:
Software licenses	$	10,167		$	11,372	$	30,835		$	31,646
Subscriptions		4,558			3,526		12,694			10,503
Software services		20,383			18,600		60,945			54,973
Maintenance		32,744			28,353		92,106			79,102
Appraisal services		4,692			5,289		14,638			14,249
Hardware and other		1,788			1,497		4,851			5,084

Total revenues		74,332			68,637		216,069			195,557

Cost of revenues:
Software licenses		1,366			2,071		4,075			6,838
Acquired software		369			472		1,042			1,369
Software services, maintenance and subscriptions		35,259			31,988		102,520			93,555
Appraisal services		2,851			3,098		9,211			9,269
Hardware and other		1,252			1,058		3,697			3,684

Total cost of revenues		41,097			38,687		120,545			114,715


Gross profit		33,235			29,950		95,524			80,842

Selling, general and administrative expenses		17,114			15,985		51,608			46,155
Research and development expense		2,973			1,416		8,047			5,485
Amortization of customer and trade name intangibles		685			612		2,034			1,770
Non-cash legal settlement related to warrants		—			—		—			9,045


Operating income		12,463			11,937		33,835			18,387

Other (expense) income, net		(42	)		398		(119	)		1,044

Income before income taxes		12,421			12,335		33,716			19,431
Income tax provision		4,946			5,976		13,362			9,700

Net income	$	7,475		$	6,359	$	20,354		$	9,731


Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.21		$	0.17	$	0.58		$	0.26

Diluted	$	0.20		$	0.16	$	0.56		$	0.25


Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		35,118			38,474		35,226			38,093
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		36,487			40,019		36,559			39,626

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Revenues:
  Software licenses $ 11,372 $ 8,145 $ 31,646 $ 24,431
  Subscriptions 3,526 2,559 10,503 7,272
  Software services 18,600 15,872 54,973 44,213
  Maintenance 28,353 22,132 79,102 62,526
  Appraisal services 5,289 4,927 14,249 16,514
  Hardware and other 1,497 1,297 5,084 4,420
          Total revenues 68,637 54,932 195,557 159,376

Cost of revenues:
  Software licenses 2,071 1,886 6,838 5,818
  Acquired software 472 427 1,369 1,248
  Software services, maintenance and subscriptions 31,988 26,795 93,555 77,677
  Appraisal services 3,098 3,248 9,269 11,340
  Hardware and other 1,058 946 3,684 3,304
          Total cost of revenues 38,687 33,302 114,715 99,387

     Gross profit 29,950 21,630 80,842 59,989

Selling, general and administrative expenses 15,985 12,691 46,155 38,448
Research and development expense 1,416 639 5,485 3,266
Amortization of customer and trade name intangibles 612 372 1,770 1,075
Non-cash legal settlement related to warrants - - 9,045 -

     Operating income 11,937 7,928 18,387 17,200

Other income, net 398 441 1,044 1,252
Income before income taxes 12,335 8,369 19,431 18,452
Income tax provision 5,976 3,209 9,700 7,141
Net income $ 6,359 $ 5,160 $ 9,731 $ 11,311

Earnings per common share:
      Basic $ 0.17 $ 0.13 $ 0.26 $ 0.29
      Diluted $ 0.16 $ 0.12 $ 0.25 $ 0.27

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 38,474 38,688 38,093 38,717
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 40,019 41,395 39,626 41,673

See accompanying notes.
See accompanying notes.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value and share amounts)


	September 30,
	2009			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,895		$	1,762
Restricted cash equivalents		6,000			5,082
Short-term investments available-for-sale		—			775
Accounts receivable (less allowance for losses of $2,100 in 2009 and $2,115 in 2008)		85,613			76,989
Prepaid expenses		7,766			8,602
Other current assets		1,767			1,444
Deferred income taxes		2,555			2,570

Total current assets		105,596			97,224

Accounts receivable, long-term portion		483			197
Property and equipment, net		31,961			26,522
Non-current investments available-for-sale		2,097			3,779

Other assets:
Goodwill		90,258			88,791
Customer related intangibles, net		26,138			27,438
Software, net		4,717			5,112
Trade name, net		2,155			2,471
Sundry		224			227

	$	263,629		$	251,761


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,186		$	2,617
Accrued liabilities		25,123			22,913
Short-term revolving line of credit		2,101			8,000
Deferred revenue		99,670			95,773
Income taxes payable		—			166

Total current liabilities		131,080			129,469

Deferred income taxes		8,092			8,030

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $10.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 48,147,969 shares issued in 2009 and 2008		481			481
Additional paid-in capital		153,000			151,245
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(359	)		(387	)
Retained earnings		70,848			50,494
Treasury stock, at cost; 13,192,620 and 12,333,549 shares in 2009 and 2008, respectively		(99,513	)		(87,571	)

Total shareholders’ equity		124,457			114,262

	$	263,629		$	251,761

See accompanying notes.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Nine months ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	20,354		$	9,731
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		7,065			8,989
Non-cash legal settlement related to warrants		—			9,045
Share-based compensation expense		3,653			2,719
Excess tax benefit from exercise of shared-based arrangements		(525	)		(560	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of effects of acquired companies:
Accounts receivable		(8,572	)		63
Income tax payable		318			(412	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,294			515
Accounts payable		1,569			(833	)
Accrued liabilities		2,474			3,555
Deferred revenue		3,619			12,587

Net cash provided by operating activities		31,249			45,399


Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of investments		2,500			44,565
Purchases of investments		—			(8,625	)
Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(2,934	)		(23,868	)
Additions to property and equipment		(8,632	)		(17,375	)
Acquired lease		—			(1,387	)
Increase in restricted investments		(918	)		(620	)
Decrease (increase) in other		11			(38	)

Net cash used by investing activities		(9,973	)		(7,348	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Decrease in net borrowings on revolving credit facility		(5,899	)		—
Purchase of treasury shares		(18,263	)		(28,968	)
Contributions from employee stock purchase plan		1,069			872
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,425			1,617
Excess tax benefits from exercise of share-based arrangements		525			560
Warrant exercise in connection with legal settlement		—			2,005

Net cash used by financing activities		(21,143	)		(23,914	)


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		133			14,137
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,762			9,642


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,895		$	23,779

See accompanying notes.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value and share amounts)

September 30,
2008 December 31,
(Unaudited) 2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
     Cash and cash equivalents $ 23,779 $ 9,642
     Restricted cash equivalents 5,082 4,462
     Short-term investments available-for-sale 500 41,590
Accounts receivable (less allowance for losses of $1,841 in 2008
       and  $1,851 in 2007) 66,430 63,965
     Prepaid expenses 7,693 7,726
     Other current assets 1,771 1,324
     Deferred income taxes 1,839 2,355
        Total current assets 107,094 131,064

Accounts receivable, long-term portion 681 398
Property and equipment, net 24,773 9,826
Non-current investments available-for-sale 4,893 -

Other assets:
     Goodwill 88,733 71,677
     Customer related intangibles, net 28,071 17,706
     Software, net 7,034 9,588
     Other intangibles, net 2,577 1,074
     Sundry 220 175
$ 264,076 $ 241,508

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
     Accounts payable $ 2,590 $ 3,323
     Accrued liabilities 26,265 18,905
     Deferred revenue 91,029 73,714
     Income taxes payable - 632
        Total current liabilities 119,884 96,574

Deferred income taxes 8,889 7,723

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $10.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized,
         none issued - -
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
        48,147,969 shares issued in 2008 and 2007 481 481
     Additional paid-in capital 150,561 149,568
     Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (167 ) -
     Retained earnings 45,363 35,632
Treasury stock, at cost; 10,321,534 and 9,528,467 shares in 2008
         and 2007, respectively (60,935 ) (48,470 )
          Total shareholders' equity 135,303 137,211
$ 264,076 $ 241,508

See accompanying notes.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

Nine months ended September 30,
2008 2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
    Net income $ 9,731 $ 11,311
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
      provided by operations:
        Depreciation and amortization 8,989 7,795
        Non-cash legal settlement related to warrants 9,045 -
        Share-based compensation expense 2,719 1,705
        Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of
          effects of acquired companies:
            Accounts receivable 63 6,532
            Income tax receivable (972 ) (800 )
            Prepaid expenses and other current assets 515 504
            Accounts payable (833 ) (1,465 )
            Accrued liabilities 3,555 (1,289 )
            Deferred revenue 12,587 245
                Net cash provided by operating activities 45,399 24,538

Cash flows from investing activities:
    Proceeds from sales of short-term investments 44,565 21,103
    Purchases of short-term investments (8,625 ) (29,940 )
    Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired (23,868 ) (9,005 )
    Investment in software development costs - (158 )
    Additions to property and equipment (17,375 ) (2,575 )
    Acquired lease (1,387 ) -
    (Increase) decrease in restricted investments (620 ) 500
    (Increase) decrease in other (38 ) 40
                Net cash used by investing activities (7,348 ) (20,035 )

Cash flows from financing activities:
    Purchase of treasury shares (28,968 ) (11,134 )
    Contributions from employee stock purchase plan 872 833
    Proceeds from exercise of stock options 1,617 3,291
    Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation expense 560 1,118
    Warrant exercise in connection with legal settlement 2,005 -
                Net cash used by financing activities (23,914 ) (5,892 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 14,137 (1,389 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 9,642 17,212

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 23,779 $ 15,823

See accompanying notes.

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(Tables in thousands, except per share data)

~~(1)~~

(1) Basis of Presentation

We prepared the accompanying condensed financial statements following the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by GAAP can be condensed or omitted for interim periods. Balance sheet amounts are as of September 30, ~~2008~~2009 and December 31, ~~2007~~2008 and operating result amounts are for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007,~~2008, and include all normal and recurring adjustments that we considered necessary for the fair summarized presentation of our financial position and operating results. As these are condensed financial statements, one should also read the financial statements and notes included in our latest Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities can vary during each quarter of the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be the same as those for the full year.

Although we have a number of operating divisions, separate segment data has not been presented as they meet the criteria set forth in ~~Statement of~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“~~SFAS”~~FASB ASC”) ~~No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information"~~280, Segment Reporting, to be presented as one segment.

(2) Revenue Recognition

~~Certain other amounts for the previous period have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Revenue Recognition~~

Software Arrangements:

We earn revenue from software licenses, subscriptions, software ~~related~~ services, post-contract customer support (“PCS” or “maintenance”), and hardware. PCS includes telephone support, bug fixes, and rights to upgrades on a when-and-if available basis. We provide services that range from installation, training, and basic consulting to software modification and customization to meet specific customer needs. In software arrangements that include rights to multiple software products, specified upgrades, PCS, and/or other services, we allocate the total arrangement fee among each deliverable based on the relative fair value of each.

We typically enter into multiple element arrangements, which include software licenses, software services, PCS and occasionally hardware. The majority of our software arrangements are multiple element arrangements, but for those arrangements that involve significant production, modification or customization of the software, or where software services are otherwise considered essential to the functionality of the software in the customer’s environment, we use contract accounting and apply the provisions of ~~Statement of Position (“SOP”) 81-1 “Accounting for Performance of~~the Construction –— Type and ~~Certain~~ Production –— Type ~~Contracts.”~~

Contracts as discussed in FASB ASC 605-35.

If the arrangement does not require significant production, modification or customization or where the software services are not considered essential to the functionality of the software, revenue is recognized when all of the following conditions are met:

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;


	ii.		delivery has occurred;


	iii.		our fee is fixed or determinable; and


	iv.	~~Collectibility~~	collectability is probable.

For multiple element arrangements, each element of the arrangement is analyzed and we allocate a portion of the total arrangement fee to the elements based on the fair value of the element using vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), regardless of any separate prices stated within the contract for each element. Fair value is considered the price a customer would be required to pay if the element was sold separately based on our historical experience of stand-alone sales of these elements to third parties. For PCS, we use renewal rates for continued support arrangements to determine fair value. For software services, we use the fair value we charge our customers when those services are sold separately. We monitor our transactions to insure we maintain and periodically revise VSOE to reflect fair value. In software arrangements in which we have the fair value of all undelivered elements but not of a delivered element, we apply the “residual method” ~~as allowed under SOP 98-9~~, in compliance with FASB ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition, in accounting for any element of a multiple element arrangement involving software that remains undelivered such that any discount inherent in a contract is allocated to the delivered element. Under the residual method, if the fair value of all undelivered elements is determinable, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered element(s) and is recognized as revenue assuming the other revenue

recognition criteria are met. In software arrangements in which we do not have VSOE for all undelivered elements, revenue is deferred until fair value is determined or all elements for which we do not have VSOE have been delivered. Alternatively, if sufficient VSOE does not exist and the only undelivered element is services that do not involve significant modification or customization of the software, the entire fee is recognized over the period during which the services are expected to be performed.

Software Licenses

We recognize the revenue allocable to software licenses and specified upgrades upon delivery of the software product or upgrade to the customer, unless the fee is not fixed or determinable or ~~collectibility~~collectability is not probable. If the fee is not fixed or determinable, including new customers whose payment terms are three months or more from shipment, revenue is generally recognized as payments become due from the customer. If ~~collectibility~~collectability is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is collected. Arrangements that include software services, such as training or installation, are evaluated to determine whether those services are essential to the product’s functionality.

A majority of our software arrangements involve “off-the-shelf” software. We consider software to be off-the-shelf software if it can be added to an arrangement with minor changes in the underlying code and it can be used by the customer for the customer’s purpose upon installation. For off-the-shelf software arrangements, we recognize the software license fee as revenue after delivery has occurred, customer acceptance is reasonably assured, that portion of the fee represents a non-refundable enforceable claim and is probable of collection, and the remaining services such as training are not considered essential to the product’s functionality.

For arrangements that involve significant production, modification or customization of the software, or where software services are otherwise considered essential, we recognize revenue using contract accounting. We generally use the percentage-of-completion method to recognize revenue from these arrangements. We measure progress-to-completion primarily using labor hours incurred, or value added. The percentage-of-completion method generally results in the recognition of reasonably consistent profit margins over the life of a contract because we have the ability to produce reasonably dependable estimates of contract billings and contract costs. We use the level of profit margin that is most likely to occur on a contract. If the most likely profit margin cannot be precisely determined, the lowest probable level of profit in the range of estimates is used until the results can be estimated more precisely. These arrangements are often implemented over an extended time period and occasionally require us to revise total cost estimates. Amounts recognized in revenue are calculated using the progress-to-completion measurement after giving effect to any changes in our cost estimates. Changes to total estimated contract costs, if any, are recorded in the period they are determined. Estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recorded in the period in which we first determine that a loss is apparent.

For arrangements that include new product releases for which it is difficult to estimate final profitability except to assume that no loss will ultimately be incurred, we recognize revenue under the completed contract method. Under the completed contract method, revenue is recognized only when a contract is completed or substantially complete. Historically these amounts have been immaterial.

Subscription-Based Services

Subscription-based services primarily consist of revenues derived from application service provider (“ASP”) arrangements and other hosted service offerings, software subscriptions and disaster recovery services.

We recognize revenue for ASP and other hosting services, software subscriptions, term license arrangements with renewal periods of twelve months or less and disaster recovery ratably over the period of the applicable agreement as services are provided. Disaster recovery agreements and other hosting services are typically renewable annually. ASP and software subscriptions are typically for periods of three to six years and automatically renew unless either party cancels the agreement. The majority of the ASP and other hosting services and software subscriptions also include professional services as well as maintenance and support. In certain ASP arrangements, the customer also acquires a license to the software.

For ASP and other hosting arrangements, we evaluate whether each of the elements in these arrangements represents a separate unit of accounting, as defined by ~~Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-21,~~FASB ASC 605-25, Multiple Element Arrangements and FASB ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition, using all applicable facts and circumstances, including whether (i) we sell or could readily sell the element unaccompanied by the other elements, (ii) the element has stand-alone value to the customer, (iii) there is objective reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item, and (iv) there is a general right of return. We consider the applicability of EITF No. 00-03, “Application of SOP 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware” on a contract-by-contract basis. In hosted term-based agreements, where the customer does not have the contractual right to take possession of the software, hosting fees are recognized on a monthly basis over the term of the contract commencing when the customer has access to the software. For professional services associated with hosting arrangements that we determine do not have stand-alone value to the customer, we recognize the services revenue

ratably over the remaining contractual period once hosting has gone live and we may begin billing for the hosting services. We record amounts that have been invoiced in accounts receivable and in deferred revenue or revenues, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met.

If we determine that the customer has the contractual right to take possession of our software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty, and can feasibly maintain the software on the customer’s hardware or enter into another arrangement with a third party to host the software, we recognize the license, professional services and hosting services revenues pursuant to ~~SOP 97-2.~~

FASB ASC 985-605, Software Revenue Recognition.

Software Services

Some of our software arrangements include services considered essential for the customer to use the software for the customer’s purposes. For these software arrangements, both the software license revenue and the services revenue are recognized as the services are performed using the percentage-of-completion contract accounting method. When software services are not considered essential, the fee allocable to the service element is recognized as revenue as we perform the services.

Computer Hardware Equipment

Revenue allocable to computer hardware equipment, which is based on VSOE, is recognized when we deliver the equipment and collection is probable.

Postcontract Customer Support

Our customers generally enter into PCS agreements when they purchase our software licenses. Our PCS agreements are typically renewable annually. Revenue allocated to PCS is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period the PCS is provided. All significant costs and expenses associated with PCS are expensed as incurred. Fair value for the maintenance and support obligations for software licenses is based upon the specific sale renewals to customers.

Allocation of Revenue in Statement of Income

In our statements of income, we allocate revenue to software licenses, software services, maintenance and hardware and other based on the VSOE of fair value for elements in each revenue arrangement and the application of the residual method for arrangements in which we have established VSOE of fair value for all undelivered elements. In arrangements where we are not able to establish VSOE of fair value for all undelivered elements, revenue is first allocated to any undelivered elements for which VSOE of fair value has been established. We then allocate revenue to any undelivered elements for which VSOE of fair value has not been established based upon management’s best estimate of fair value of those undelivered elements and apply a residual method to determine the license fee. Management’s best estimate of fair value of undelivered elements for which VSOE of fair value has not been established is based upon the VSOE of similar offerings and other objective criteria.

Appraisal Services:

For our property appraisal projects, we recognize revenue using the proportionate performance method of revenue recognition since many of these projects are implemented over one to three year periods and consist of various unique activities. Under this method of revenue recognition, we identify each activity for the appraisal project, with a typical project generally calling for bonding, office set up, training, routing of map information, data entry, data collection, data verification, informal hearings, appeals and project management. Each activity or act is specifically identified and assigned an estimated cost. Costs which are considered to be associated with indirect activities, such as bonding costs and office set up, are expensed as incurred. These costs are typically billed as incurred and are recognized as revenue equal to cost. Direct contract fulfillment activities and related supervisory costs such as data collection, data entry and verification are expensed as incurred. The direct costs for these activities are determined and the total contract value is then allocated to each activity based on a consistent profit margin. Each activity is assigned a consistent unit of measure to determine progress towards completion and revenue is recognized for each activity based upon the percentage complete as applied to the estimated revenue for that activity. Progress for the fulfillment activities is typically based on labor hours or an output measure such as the number of parcel counts completed for that activity. Estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recorded in the period in which we first determine that a loss is apparent.

Other:

The majority of deferred revenue consists of unearned support and maintenance revenue that has been billed based on contractual terms in the underlying arrangement with the remaining balance consisting of payments received in advance of revenue being earned under software licensing, subscription-based services, software and appraisal services and hardware installation. Unbilled revenue is not billable at the balance sheet date but is recoverable over the remaining life of the contract through billings made in accordance with contractual agreements. The termination clauses in most of our contracts provide for the payment for the fair value of products delivered and services performed in the event of an early termination.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets include direct and incremental costs, consisting primarily of commissions associated with arrangements for which revenue recognition has been deferred and third party subcontractor payments. Such costs are expensed at the time the related revenue is recognized.

(3) Acquisitions

~~(3)~~

~~Acquisitions~~

~~In August 2008,~~On July 16, 2009, we completed the acquisition of ~~all~~certain assets of KPL, Inc. d/b/a Parker-Lowe & Associates (“Parker-Lowe”) for $700,000 in cash. Parker-Lowe provides scanning and retrieval software and related services for land record and social services offices in local governments primarily in the ~~capital stock~~North Carolina area. This acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of ~~School Information Systems, Inc. (“SIS”) which develops and sells~~ a full suite of student information and financial management systems for K-12 schools. The purchase price, including transaction costs and excluding cash balances acquired, was approximately $9.9 million in cash and approximately 70,000 shares of Tyler common stock valued at $1.2 million.business.

~~In the first quarter of 2008,~~On April 3, 2009, we completed the ~~acquisitions~~acquisition of all of the capital stock of ~~VersaTrans Solutions~~Assessment Evaluation Services, Inc. (“~~VersaTrans”~~AES”). AES develops integrated property appraisal solutions and ~~certain assets~~specializes in applications that deal with the unique provisions of ~~Olympia Computing Company, Inc. d/b/a Schoolmaster (“Schoolmaster”). VersaTrans is a provider of student transportation management software solutions for school districts~~the California Revenue and school transportation providers across North America, including solutions for school bus routing and planning, redistricting, GPS fleet tracking, fleet maintenance and field trip planning. Schoolmaster provides a full suite of student information systems, which manage such functions as grading, attendance, scheduling, guidance, health, admissions and fund raising.Taxation Code. The ~~combined~~ purchase price ~~for these transactions excluding cash acquired and including transaction costs,~~ was approximately ~~$13.9~~$1.1 million in ~~cash and approximately 126,000 shares of Tyler common stock valued at $1.7 million.~~

~~The operating results of these acquisitions are included in our results of operations since their respective dates of acquisition.~~

cash. We believe ~~these acquisitions~~this acquisition will complement our business model by expanding our presence in the ~~education market and will give us additional opportunities to provide our customers with~~California property appraisal solutions ~~tailored specifically for local governments.~~

market.

In connection with these ~~three~~ transactions we acquired total tangible assets of approximately ~~$3.6 million~~$480,000 and assumed total liabilities of approximately ~~$8.2 million.~~$835,000, including $450,000 for contingent consideration. We recorded goodwill of ~~$17.0~~approximately $1.3 million, ~~$7.7 million~~all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes, and other intangible assets of ~~$14.3 million.~~approximately $820,000. The ~~$14.3 million~~$820,000 of intangible assets is attributable to acquired software and customer relationships ~~and trade name~~ that will be amortized over a weighted average period of approximately 107 years. Our balance sheet as of September 30, ~~2008~~2009 reflects the ~~preliminary~~ allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition.

The operating results of these acquisitions are included in our results of operations since the date of acquisition.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we also paid approximately $1.1 million for certain software assets to compliment our tax and appraisal solutions and our student information management solutions.

(4)

Financial Instruments

Assets recorded at fair value in the balance sheet as of September 30, ~~2008~~2009 are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ~~SFAS 157 “Fair~~the FASB ASC 820, Fair Value ~~Measurements”~~Measurements and Disclosures, are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets are as follows:

	Level 1		— Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date;

	Level 2		— Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

	Level 3		— Unobservable inputs, for which little or no market data exist, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

~~Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date~~

~~Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and~~

~~Level 3 – Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions developed by management,~~

~~which reflect those that a market participant would use.~~

We measure the following financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of these financial assets was determined using the following inputs at September 30, ~~2008:~~2009:


			Quoted prices in
			active markets for		Significant other		Significant
			identical assets		observable inputs		unobservable inputs
	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,895	$	7,895	$	—	$	—
Non-current investments available-for-sale		2,097		—		—		2,097

Total	$	9,992	$	7,895	$	—	$	2,097

Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets

Significant other
observable inputs

Significant
unobservable inputs

Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
$ 28,861 $ 28,861 $ - $ -
Short-term investments available-for-sale (1)
500 500 - -
Non-current investments available-for-sale (2)
4,893 - - 4,893
Total $ 34,254 $ 29,361 $ - $ 4,893

~~(1)~~

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less, for which we determine fair value through quoted market prices. Level 1 financial assets also include auction rate municipal securities which were sold at par during the period October 1, 2008 through October 17, 2008.

~~(2)~~

Investments available-for-sale consists of auction rate municipal securities (“ARS”). ARS were originally considered Level 2 financial assets and valued using estimated market values as of the balance sheet date obtained from an independent pricing service employed by our broker dealers. These independent pricing services carried these investments at par value, due to the overall quality of the underlying investments and taking into account credit support through insurance policies guaranteeing each of the bonds’ payment of principal and accrued interest, and the anticipated future market for such investments. However, in the three months ending September 30, 2008, we began using discounted cash flow analysis to more accurately measure possible liquidity discounts. Because the discounted cash flow analysis included unobservable inputs we transferred these securities to Level 3 financial assets.

~~At September 30, 2008 our ARS~~ consist ~~solely~~primarily of money market funds with original maturity dates of three months or less, for which we determine fair value through quoted market prices. Investments available-for-sale consist of two auction rate municipal securities (“ARS”) which are collateralized debt obligations supported by municipal agencies and ~~state~~do not include mortgage-backed securities. These ARS have maturities ranging from 23 to 33 years.

The par and carrying values, and related cumulative unrealized loss for our ARS as of September 30, 2009 are as follows:


			Temporary		Carrying
	Par Value		Impairment		Value
Investments available-for-sale	$	2,650	$	553	$	2,097

All of our ARS are reflected at estimated fair value in the balance sheet at September 30, 2009. In prior periods, due to the auction process which took place every 28 to 35 days for most ARS, quoted market prices were readily available, which would have qualified as Level 1. However, due to the financial market crisis the auction events for these securities have failed. Therefore, quoted prices in active markets are no longer available and we determined the estimated fair values of these securities utilizing a discounted trinomial model. The model considers the probability of three potential occurrences for each auction event through the maturity date of each ARS. The three potential outcomes for each auction are (i) successful auction/early redemption, (ii) failed auction and (iii) issuer default. Inputs in determining the probabilities of the potential outcomes include but are not limited to, the securities’ collateral, credit rating, insurance, issuer’s financial standing, contractual restrictions on disposition and the liquidity in the market. The fair value of each ARS is determined by summing the present value of the probability-weighted future principal and interest payments determined by the model.

In association with this estimate of fair value, we have recorded an after tax temporary unrealized gain on our ARS of $28,000, net of related tax effects of $15,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our balance sheet. The unrealized gain includes the impact of adjusting previously recorded unrealized losses of approximately $120,000, net of related tax effects of $65,000 as of December 31, 2008 for several ARS which were subsequently redeemed for $2.5 million at par during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, we have continued to earn and collect interest on all of our ARS. We believe that this temporary decline in fair value is due entirely to liquidity issues, because the underlying assets of these securities are supported by municipal agencies and do not include mortgage-backed securities, have redemption features which call for redemption at 100% of par value and have a current credit rating ofbetween A orand AAA. The ratings on the ARS take into account credit support through insurance policies guaranteeing each of the bonds’ payment of principal and accrued interest, if it becomes necessary. To date we have collected all interest payable on all of our ARS when due and expect to continue to do so in the future. Historically, the carrying value (par value) of the ARS approximated fair market value due to the frequent resetting of variable interest rates. Beginning in February 2008, however, the auctions for ARS began to fail and were largely unsuccessful, requiring us to hold them beyond their typical auction reset dates. As a result, the interest rates on these investments reset to the maximum based on formulas contained in the securities. The rates are generally equal to or higher than the current market for similar securities. The par value of the ARS associated with these failed auctions will not be available to us until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside of the auction process, the securities are called or the underlying securities have matured. Due to these liquidity issues, we performed a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the estimated fair value of these investments. The assumptions used in preparing the models include, but are not limited to, interest rate yield curves for similar securities, market rates of returns, and the expected term of each security. In making assumptions of required rates of return, we considered risk-free interest rates and credit spreads for investments of similar credit quality. As a result of the lack of liquidity in the ARS market, we recorded an after tax temporary unrealized loss on our ARS of $167,000, net of related tax effects of $90,000, in the three months ended September, 30, 2008, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our balance sheet. We deemed the loss to be temporary becauseaddition, we do not plan to sell any of the ARS prior to maturity at an amount below the original purchase value and, at this time, do not deem it probable that we will receive less than 100% of the principal and accrued interest. Based on our cash and cash equivalents balance of ~~$28.9~~$7.9 million, expected operating cash flows, availability under our revolving credit agreement, and ~~the~~ liquidation of ~~$500,000~~$2.5 million of ARS ~~subsequent to~~during the ~~period ending~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we do not believe a lack of liquidity associated with our ARS will adversely affect our ability to conduct business, and believe we have the ability to hold the securities throughout the currently estimated recovery period. We have classified these securities as non-current because we believe the market for these securities may take in excess of twelve months to fully recover. We will continue to evaluate any changes in the market value of ~~the failed~~our ARS ~~that have not been liquidated subsequent to quarter-end~~ and in the future, depending upon existing market conditions, we may be required to record an other-than-temporary decline in market value. We are not certain how long we may be required to hold each security. However, given our current cash position, liquid cash equivalents and cash flow from operations we believe we have the ability and we intend to hold the failed ARS as long-term investments until the market stabilizes.

The following table reflects the activity for ~~the ARS~~assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs ~~(in thousands):~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:

Three months ended Nine months ended
Auction Rate Securities: September 30, 2008 September 30, 2008
Balance at beginning of period $ - $ -
Transfers into level 3 5,150 5,150
Unrealized losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive income (257 ) (257 )
Balance as of September 30, 2008 $ 4,893 $ 4,893


Balance as of December 31, 2008	$	3,779
Transfers into level 3		—
Transfers out of level 3		—
Unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		(46	)

Balance as of March 31, 2009		3,733
Transfers into level 3		—
Transfers out of level 3		(25	)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements		(900	)
Unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		(8	)

Balance as of June 30, 2009		2,800
Transfers into level 3		—
Transfers out of level 3		—
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements		(800	)
Unrealized gains included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		97

Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	2,097

(5) ~~Comprehensive Income~~

~~The following table provides the composition of other comprehensive income:~~

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Net income, as reported $ 6,359 $ 5,160 $ 9,731 $ 11,311
Unrealized losses-auction rate securities, net of tax (167 ) - (167 ) -
Comprehensive income $ 6,192 $ 5,160 $ 9,564 $ 11,311

~~(6)~~ Shareholders’ Equity

The following table details activity in our common stock:

Nine months ended September 30,
2008 2007
Shares Amount Shares Amount
Purchases of common stock (2,194 ) $ (31,322 ) (889 ) $ (11,134 )
Stock option exercises 325 1,617 767 3,291
Employee stock plan purchases 78 892 77 853
Shares issued for acquisitions 196 2,863 - -
Warrant exercises in connection with legal settlement 802 11,050 - -


	Nine months ended September 30,
	2009						2008
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
Purchases of common stock		(1,235	)	$	(17,000	)		(2,194	)	$	(31,322	)
Stock option exercises		285			1,425			325			1,617
Employee stock plan purchases		91			1,074			78			892
Shares issued for acquisitions		—			—			196			2,863
Warrant exercises in connection with legal settlement		—			—			802			11,050

As of September 30, ~~2008~~2009 we have authorization from our board of directors to repurchase up to ~~1.6~~2.3 million additional shares of Tyler common stock. ~~During the period~~

(6) Short-Term Revolving Line of Credit

In October ~~1, 2008 through October 20,~~ 2008, we ~~purchased 1.5~~entered into a revolving bank credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) and a related pledge and security agreement which originally matured October 19, 2009. The Credit Facility provided for total borrowings of up to $25.0 million ~~shares~~and a $6.0 million Letter of Credit facility. Borrowings bore interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 1% or prime rate minus 1.5%. As of September 30, 2009, our effective interest rate was 1.47% under the Credit Facility. The effective average interest rate for borrowings during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was also 1.47%. The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our personal property and requires us to maintain certain financial ratios and other financial conditions and prohibits us from making certain investments, advances, cash dividends or loans, restricts the amount of our common stock ~~for an aggregate~~we can purchase ~~price~~and limits incurrence of ~~$20.6 million.~~ additional indebtedness and liens. As of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with those covenants.

As of September 30, 2009, we had outstanding borrowings of $2.1 million and unused borrowing capacity of $21.6 million under the Credit Facility. In addition, as of September 30, 2009, our bank had issued outstanding letters of credit totaling $7.3 million to secure surety bonds required by some of our customer contracts. These letters of credit have been collateralized by restricted cash balances of $6.0 million and $1.3 million of our available borrowing capacity and expire through mid-2010. The carrying amount of the Credit Facility approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instrument.

On October ~~23, 2008, our board~~19, 2009, we amended and extended the related pledge and security agreement. The Credit Facility now matures October 18, 2010 and provides for total borrowings of ~~directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 2.0 million shares.~~

~~On June 27, 2008, we settled outstanding litigation related~~up to ~~two Stock Purchase Warrants owned by Bank of America, N. A. (“BANA”). In July 2008, as a result of this settlement, BANA paid us $2.0~~$25.0 million and wea $10.0 million Letter of Credit facility which can either be cash collateralized or issued ~~to BANA 801,883 restricted shares~~using availability under the Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate of ~~Tyler common stock. See Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies for further information.~~

either the Wall Street Journal prime rate minus .5% or the 30, 60 or 90-day LIBOR rate plus 2%; however, a minimum interest rate of 3.25% will apply.

(7) Income Tax Provision

For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we had an effective income tax rate of ~~48.4%~~39.8% and ~~49.9%~~39.6%, respectively, compared to ~~38.3%~~48.4% and ~~38.7%~~49.9% for the three ~~months~~ and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007. Our~~2008, respectively. The prior year effective ~~income~~ tax rate ~~increased approximately twelve points compared to~~included the ~~prior year periods due to~~impact of a non-cash legal settlement related to warrants charge of $9.0 million in 2008, which was not deductible. The effective income tax rates for the periods presented were different from the statutory United States federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to a non-cash legal settlement related to warrants charge which was not deductible, state income taxes, non-deductible share-based compensation expense, the qualified manufacturing activities deduction and non-deductible meals and entertainment costs.

We made federal and state income tax payments, net of refunds, of ~~$10.1~~$13.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, compared to ~~$6.9~~$10.1 million in net payments for the same period of the prior year.

(8) Earnings Per Share

The following table details the reconciliation of basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

Net income	$	7,475	$	6,359	$	20,354	$	9,731


Denominator:

Weighted-average basic common shares outstanding		35,118		38,474		35,226		38,093
Assumed conversion of dilutive securities:
Stock options		1,369		1,545		1,333		1,533

Denominator for diluted earnings per share — Adjusted weighted-average shares		36,487		40,019		36,559		39,626


Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.17	$	0.58	$	0.26

Diluted	$	0.20	$	0.16	$	0.56	$	0.25

For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 stock options representing the right to purchase common stock of 2.7 million shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, stock options representing the right to purchase common stock of 2.1 million shares and 1.3 million shares, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect.

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

  Net income $ 6,359 $ 5,160 $ 9,731 $ 11,311

Denominator:

Weighted-average basic common shares outstanding 38,474 38,688 38,093 38,717
  Assumed conversion of dilutive securities:
   Stock options 1,545 1,685 1,533 1,753
   Warrants - 1,022 - 1,203
Potentially dilutive common shares 1,545 2,707 1,533 2,956

Denominator for diluted earnings
  per share - Adjusted weighted-average shares 40,019 41,395 39,626 41,673

Earnings per common share:
      Basic $ 0.17 $ 0.13 $ 0.26 $ 0.29
      Diluted $ 0.16 $ 0.12 $ 0.25 $ 0.27

(9) Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense related to share-based awards ~~under SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,”~~ recorded in the statements of ~~operations:~~operations, pursuant to FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation:

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Cost of software services, maintenance and subscriptions $ 100 $ 59 $ 250 $ 158
Selling, general and administrative expense 998 573 2,469 1,547
Total share-based compensation expense $ 1,098 $ 632 $ 2,719 $ 1,705


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Cost of software services, maintenance and subscriptions	$	139	$	100	$	393	$	250
Selling, general and administrative expense		1,149		998		3,260		2,469

Total share-based compensation expense	$	1,288	$	1,098	$	3,653	$	2,719

(10) Commitments and Contingencies

On November 3, 2008, a putative collective action complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Court”) on behalf of current and former “customer support analysts,” “client liaisons,” “engineers,” “trainers,” and “education services specialists.” The petition alleges that we misclassified these groups of employees as “exempt” rather than “non-exempt” under the Fair Labor Standards Act and that we therefore failed to properly pay overtime wages. The suit was initiated by six former employees working out of our Longview, Texas, office and seeks to recover damages in the form of lost overtime pay since October 31, 2005, liquidated damages equal to the amount of lost overtime pay, interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees. On June ~~27, 2008, we settled outstanding litigation related~~23, 2009, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification for the purpose of providing notice to ~~two Stock Purchase Warrants (the “Warrants”) owned by Bank of America, N. A. (“BANA”). As disclosed in prior SEC filings,~~potential plaintiffs about the ~~Warrants entitled BANA~~litigation. On September 22, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion to ~~acquire 1.6 million shares of Tyler common stock at~~provide for additional email notice to potential plaintiffs and to extend the “opt in” period for an ~~exercise price of $2.50 per share. The Warrants expired on September 10, 2007. Prior~~additional thirty days. We intend to ~~their expiration, BANA attempted to exercise~~vigorously defend the ~~Warrants; however,~~action. Given the parties disputed whether or not BANA’s exercise was effective. We filed suit for declaratory judgment seeking a court’s determination on the matter, and BANA asserted numerous counterclaims against us, including breach of contract and misrepresentation.

~~Following court-ordered mediation, in July 2008, BANA paid us $2.0 million and we issued to BANA 801,883 restricted shares of Tyler common stock. Accordingly, as a result~~preliminary nature of the ~~settlement,~~alleged claims and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, we ~~recorded a non-cash~~cannot at this time estimate the possible outcome of any such action.

Other than ordinary course, routine litigation incidental to our business and except as described in this Quarterly Report, there are no material legal ~~settlement related~~proceedings pending to ~~warrants charge~~which we are party or to which any of ~~$9.0 million, which is not tax deductible, during the three months ended June 30, 2008.~~

~~In February 2008~~ our board of directors authorized negotiations to purchase a building in Falmouth, Maine that we currently lease from a related party. We expect to purchase this building for approximately $10.0 million in the three months ending December 31, 2008.

properties are subject.

(11) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~In December 2007,~~Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~issued SFAS No. 141(R) “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) changes~~(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“FASB ASC 105-10”). FASB ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting ~~for business combinations including~~principles recognized by the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changesFASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the ~~acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. SFAS~~preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.

On September 23, 2009, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. ~~141(R) is~~08-1, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF”). EITF 08-1 updates the current guidance pertaining to multiple-element revenue arrangements included in FASB ASC 605-25, which originated primarily from EITF 00-21, also titled “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” EITF 08-1 will be effective for ~~fiscal years~~annual reporting periods beginning ~~after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited.~~January 1, 2011 for calendar-year entities. We are currently evaluating the impact of ~~the pending adoption of SFAS 141(R)~~EITF 08-1 on our financial ~~statements.~~

position, results of operations, cash flows, and disclosures.

(12) Subsequent ~~Event~~Events

OnWe evaluate events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date as potential subsequent events. We performed this evaluation through October ~~20, 2008,~~29, 2009, the date on which we entered into a new revolving bank credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) and a related pledge and security agreement. The Credit Facility matures October 19, 2009 and provides for total borrowings of up to $25.0 million and a $6.0 million Letter of Credit facility under which the bank will issue cash collateralized letters of credit. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 1% or prime rate minus 1.5%. As of October 20, 2008,issued our ~~effective interest rate was 3% under the Credit Facility. As of October 24, 2008 we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility.~~financial statements.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

~~The statements in this discussion that are not historical statements are~~This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the ~~Private~~ Securities ~~Litigation Reform~~ Act of ~~1995. These~~1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are not historical in nature and typically address future or anticipated events, trends, expectations or beliefs with respect to our financial condition, results of operations or business. Forward-looking statements often contain words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “foresees,” “forecasts,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “might,” “could” or other similar words or phrases. Similarly, statements that describe our business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals also are forward-looking statements. We believe there is a reasonable basis for our forward-looking statements, ~~include statements about our business, financial condition, business strategy, plans~~but they are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from the ~~objectives of our management,~~expectations and ~~future prospects. In addition, we have made~~beliefs reflected in the ~~past and may make in~~forward-looking statements. We presently consider the ~~future other written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements regarding future operating performance, short and long-term revenue and earnings growth,~~following to be among the timing of the revenue and earnings impact for new contracts, backlog, the value of new contract signings, business pipeline, and industry growth rates and our performance relative thereto. Any forward-looking statements may rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and be subject to a number of uncertainties and otherimportant factors ~~many of which are outside our control, which~~that could cause actual results to differ materially from ~~such statements. These include, but are not limited to:~~our expectations and beliefs: (1) economic, political and market conditions, including the recent global economic and financial crisis, and the general tightening of access to debt or equity capital; (2) our ability to ~~improve productivity~~achieve our financial forecasts due to various factors, including project delays by our customers, reductions in transaction size, fewer transactions, delays in delivery of new products or releases or a decline in our renewal rates for service agreements; (3) changes in the budgets or regulatory environments of our customers, primarily local and ~~achieve synergies from acquired businesses;~~state governments, that could negatively impact information technology spending; (4) technological and market risks associated with the development of new products ~~and the enhancement~~or services or of new versions of existing ~~products; changes in~~or acquired products or services; (5) our ability to successfully complete acquisitions and achieve growth or operational synergies through the ~~budgets~~integration of acquired businesses, while avoiding unanticipated costs and ~~regulating environments of our government customers;~~disruptions to existing operations; (6) competition in the industry in which we conduct business and the impact of competition on pricing, ~~revenues~~customer retention and ~~margins; with respect to customer contracts accounted~~pressure for ~~under~~new products or services; (7) the ~~percentage-of-completion method of accounting, the performance of such contracts in accordance with our cost and revenue estimates; our~~ ability ~~to maintain health and other insurance coverage and capacity due to changes in the insurance market and the impact of increasing insurance costs on the results of operations; the costs~~ to attract and retain qualified personnel ~~changes in product demand,~~and dealing with the ~~availability~~loss or retirement of ~~products, economic conditions,~~key members of management or other key personnel; and (8) costs of compliance and any failure to comply with ~~corporate governance~~government and ~~public disclosure requirements as issued by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act~~stock exchange regulations. A detailed discussion of ~~2002 and New York Stock Exchange rules, changes in tax risks~~these factors and other risks ~~indicated~~that affect our business are described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange ~~Commission. The factors described~~Commission, including the detailed “Risk Factors” contained in this paragraph and other factors that may affect Tyler, its management or future financial results, as and when applicable, are discussed in Tyler's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,our most recent annual report on ~~its~~ Form ~~10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Except~~10-K. We expressly disclaim any obligation to ~~the extent required by law, we are not obligated to~~publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words "believes," "plans," "estimates," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "continue," "may," "will," "should," "projects," "forecast," "might," "could" or the negative of such terms and similar expressions as they relate to Tyler or our ~~management are intended to identify~~ forward-looking statements.

GENERAL

We provide integrated information management solutions and services for local governments. We develop and market a broad line of software products and services to address the information technology (“IT”) needs of cities, counties, schools and other local government entities. In addition, we provide professional IT services to our customers, including software and hardware installation, data conversion, and training and for certain customers, product modifications, along with continuing maintenance and support for customers using our systems. We also provide subscription-based services such as application service provider arrangements and other hosting services as well as property appraisal outsourcing services for taxing jurisdictions.

On June 27, 2008, we settled outstanding litigation related to two Stock Purchase Warrants (the “Warrants”) owned by Bank of America, N. A. (“BANA”). As disclosed in prior SEC filings, the Warrants entitled BANA to acquire 1.6 million shares of Tyler common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. Following court-ordered mediation, in July 2008, BANA paid us $2.0 million and we issued to BANA 801,883 restricted shares of Tyler common stock. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash legal settlement related to warrants charge of $9.0 million, which is not tax deductible, during the three months ended June 30, 2008.

~~In August 2008,~~April 3, 2009, we completed the acquisition of all the capital stock of School Information Systems, Inc. (“SIS”) which develops and sells a full suite of student information and financial management systems for K-12 schools. The total purchase price, including transaction costs and excluding cash balances acquired, was approximately $9.9 million in cash and approximately 70,000 shares of Tyler common stock valued at $1.2 million. In the first quarter of 2008, we acquired all of the capital stock of ~~VersaTrans Solutions~~Assessment Evaluation Services, Inc. (“AES”). AES develops integrated property appraisal solutions and specializes in applications that deal with the unique provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. The purchase price was approximately $1.1 million in cash.

On July 16, 2009, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of ~~Olympia Computing Company,~~KPL, Inc. d/b/a ~~Schoolmaster. The combined purchase price, excluding cash acquired~~Parker-Lowe & Associates (“Parker-Lowe”) for $700,000 in cash. Parker-Lowe provides scanning and ~~including transaction costs, was~~retrieval software and related services for land record and social services offices in local governments primarily in the North Carolina area.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we have also paid approximately ~~$13.9~~$1.1 million ~~in cash~~for various software assets to compliment our tax and ~~approximately 126,000 shares of Tyler common stock valued at $1.7 million.~~appraisal solutions and our student information management solutions. See Note 3 in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

As of September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, our total ~~full-time equivalent~~ employee count increased to ~~1,938~~1,979 from ~~1,640~~1,938 at September 30, ~~2007. Approximately 49% of these additions or 146 full-time equivalent employees were added as a result of several acquisitions completed since September 30, 2007.~~2008.

Outlook

The financial market crisis has continued to disrupt credit and equity markets worldwide in 2009. Local and state governments may face financial pressures that could in turn affect our growth rate and operating results in 2009. We are closely monitoring market conditions and the potential impact on our business.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed financial statements. These condensed financial statements have been prepared following the requirements of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim periods and require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and amortization and potential impairment of intangible assets and goodwill and share-based compensation expense. As these are condensed financial statements, one should also read expanded information about our critical accounting policies and estimates provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in our 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008.

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~Revenues~~

~~The following table sets forth the key components of our revenues for the periods presented as of September 30:~~

Third Quarter % Nine Months %
% of % of Increase/ % of % of Increase/
($ in thousands) 2008 Total 2007 Total (Decrease) 2008 Total 2007 Total (Decrease)

Software licenses $ 11,372 17 % $ 8,145 15 % 40 % $ 31,646 16 % $ 24,431 15 % 30 %
Subscription 3,526 5 2,559 �� 5 38 10,503 5 7,272 5 44
Software services 18,600 27 15,872 29 17 54,973 28 44,213 28 24
Maintenance 28,353 41 22,132 40 28 79,102 41 62,526 39 27
Appraisal services 5,289 8 4,927 9 7 14,249 7 16,514 10 (14 )
Hardware and other 1,497 2 1,297 2 15 5,084 3 4,420 3 15

Total revenues $ 68,637 100 % $ 54,932 100 % 25 % $ 195,557 100 % $ 159,376 100 % 23 %
Revenues

The following table sets forth the key components of our revenues for the periods presented as of September 30:


	Third Quarter											%			Nine Months										%
			% of					% of				Increase/					% of					% of			Increase/
($ in thousands)	2009		Total			2008		Total				(Decrease)			2009		Total			2008		Total			(Decrease)

Software licenses	$	10,167		14	%	$	11,372		17	%			(11	)%	$	30,835		14	%	$	31,646		16	%		(3	)%
Subscription		4,558		6			3,526		5				29			12,694		6			10,503		5			21
Software services		20,383		28			18,600		27				10			60,945		28			54,973		28			11
Maintenance		32,744		44			28,353		41				15			92,106		43			79,102		41			16
Appraisal services		4,692		6			5,289		8				(11	)		14,638		7			14,249		7			3
Hardware and other		1,788		2			1,497		2				19			4,851		2			5,084		3			(5	)


Total revenues	$	74,332		100	%	$	68,637		100	%	��		8	%	$	216,069		100	%	$	195,557		100	%		10	%

~~Total revenues grew 15% and 14% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, excluding the impact of acquisitions completed in the prior twelve months.~~

Software licenses. Software license revenues consist of the following components for the periods presented as of September 30:


	Third Quarter										%			Nine Months										%
			% of					% of			Increase/					% of					% of			Increase/
($ in thousands)	2009		Total			2008		Total			(Decrease)			2009		Total			2008		Total			(Decrease)

Financial management and education	$	5,346		53	%	$	6,452		57	%		(17	)%	$	17,579		57	%	$	21,023		66	%		(16)	%
Courts and justice		3,607		35			3,914		34			(8	)		9,999		32			7,754		25			29
Appraisal and tax and other		1,214		12			1,006		9			21			3,257		11			2,869		9			14


Total software license revenues	$	10,167		100	%	$	11,372		100	%		(11	)%	$	30,835		100	%	$	31,646		100	%		(3)	%

~~Software licenses. Software license revenues consist of the following components for the periods presented as of September 30:~~

Third Quarter % Nine Months %
% of % of Increase/ % of % of Increase/
2008 Total 2007 Total (Decrease) 2008 Total 2007 Total (Decrease)

Financial management
  and education $       6,452       57 % $    6,111       75 %             6 % $    21,023       66 % $    16,703       68 %          26 %
Courts and justice           3,914       34        1,188       15         229          7,754       25          5,039       21          54
Appraisal and tax and other           1,006         9           846       10           19          2,869         9          2,689       11            7

Total software license revenues $     11,372     100 % $    8,145     100 %           40 % $    31,646     100 % $    24,431     100 %          30 %

In the three months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we signed 1617 new ~~material~~large contracts with average software license fees of approximately ~~$215,000~~$411,000 compared to 2616 new ~~material~~large contracts signed in the three months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 with average software license fees of approximately ~~$319,000.~~$215,000. In the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we signed 5047 new ~~material~~large contracts with average software license fees of approximately ~~$310,000~~$339,000 compared to 5950 new ~~material~~large contracts signed in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 with average software license fees of approximately ~~$447,000.~~$310,000. We consider contracts with a license fee component of $100,000 or more to be material. The mix of our new contracts signed in the three months ended September 30, 2008 included more contacts with a license fee component of less than $100,000 compared to the prior year period.large. Although a contract is signed in a particular quarter, the period in which the revenue is recognized may be different because we recognize revenue according to our revenue recognition policy as described in Note 2 in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements.

Changes in software license revenues consist of the following components:

Software license revenue related to our financial management and education solutions for three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 declined $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, compared to the prior year periods due to several factors. In the past few months our sales cycle to negotiate and close contracts which have reached the request for proposal phase has lengthened slightly. The software installation period for most of our financial management and education solutions is relatively short and delays in the timing of signing new contracts will impact our results in the short term. In addition, a few contracts have included requirements to construct interfaces to existing systems or other essential functionality which results in recognizing revenue over a longer period of time. We have also entered into a few contract arrangements with extended payment terms which negatively impacted the amount of software license revenue we could recognize in the three months ended September 30, 2009. We currently expect software license revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2009 to be comparable to the prior year period.

Software license revenue related to our financial management and education solutions for three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased 6% and 26%, respectively, compared to the prior year periods mainly due to contract arrangements that included more software license revenue than in the past. Revenue from

In addition, we acquired a student information and financial management ~~solutions as well as student transportation management solutions acquired~~solution for K-12 schools in ~~the last twelve months also~~August 2008, which contributed approximately $189,000 and $940,000 to ~~increases in~~software license revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2008.~~2009, respectively.

Software license revenue related to our courts and justice software solutions for three months ended September 30, 2009 declined $307,000 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 mainly because the prior year period included $1.7 million from one contract which had been deferred in accordance with the terms of the contract. Courts and justice software license revenue increased $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the prior year period. Both year-to-date periods included approximately $1.7 million from contracts which had been deferred in accordance with the terms of these contracts. Courts and justice software license revenues increased due to contract arrangements that included more software license revenue than in the comparable prior year periods and from improved installation processes as our primary courts and justice solution matures.

Software license revenue related to our courts and justice software solutions for three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased 229% and 54%, respectively, compared to the prior year periods. In the three months ended September 30, 2008 we recorded software license revenue of approximately $1.7 million from a contract which had been deferred in accordance with the terms of the contract. In addition, since late 2007 we expanded our presence in the markets for municipal courts software solutions and public safety software solutions which contributed to the increase in both periods.

Subscriptions.Subscription-based services revenue primarily consists of revenues derived from ASP arrangements and other hosted service offerings, software subscriptions and disaster recovery services. ASP and other software subscriptions agreements are typically for periods of three to six years and automatically renew unless either party cancels the agreement. Disaster recovery and miscellaneous other hosted service agreements are typically renewable annually. New customers for ASP and other hosted service offerings as well as existing customers who converted to our ASP model provided the majority of the subscription revenue increase with the remaining increase due to new disaster recovery customers and slightly higher rates for disaster recovery services. In June 2008, as a result of changes in its technology organization, one customer terminated its ASP arrangement with us and elected, as provided in the ASP contract, to purchase the software instead. This contract contributed approximately $450,000 of subscription revenue in each of the first two quarters of 2008.

Software services. Changes in software services revenues consist of the following components:

Software services revenue related to financial management and education solutions, which comprise approximately 50% of our software services revenue in the periods presented, increased 9% and 12% compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. This increase was driven in part by additions to our implementation and support staff as well as leverage in the utilization of our implementation and support staff. In addition, our revenue mix included more contracts with larger customers than the prior year period. Contracts with large customers generally require more project management and consulting services.

~~Subscriptions.~~ Subscription-based services revenue primarily consists of revenues derived from application service provider (“ASP”) arrangements and other hosted service offerings, software subscriptions and disaster recovery services. ASP and other software subscriptions agreements are typically for periods of three to six years and automatically renew unless either party cancels the agreement. Disaster recovery and miscellaneous other hosted service agreements are typically renewable annually. New ASP customers and existing customers converting to ASP arrangements provided approximately two-thirds of the subscription revenue increase with the remaining increase due to new disaster recovery customers and slightly higher rates for disaster recovery services.

~~Software services. Changes in software services revenues consist of the following components:~~

Software services revenue related to financial management and education solutions, which comprise approximately half of our software services revenue in the periods presented, increased substantially compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was driven in part by larger and more complex contracts, which include more programming and project management services. In addition, we acquired a student ~~transportation~~information and financial management solution for K-12 schools in ~~January~~August 2008, which contributed approximately ~~$1.1 million~~$265,000 and ~~$3.0 million~~$831,000 to software service revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, respectively.

Software services revenue related to courts and justice solutions comprise approximately 30% of our software services revenues in the periods presented and increased 4% and 17% compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. These increases reflect our increased capacity to deliver backlog following additions to our implementation and support staff beginning mid-2008 and slightly higher rates on some arrangements.

Software services revenue related to courts and justice solutions experienced strong increases compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, reflecting increased capacity to deliver backlog following additions to our implementation and support staff over the last twelve to fourteen months. In addition, increased contract volume for municipal courts software solutions and public safety software solutions also generated higher related services revenue.

Maintenance. We provide maintenance and support services for our software products and third party software. Maintenance revenues increased 15% and 16% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively compared to the prior year periods. Maintenance and support services grew 13% and 14% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, excluding the impact of acquisitions completed in the prior twelve months. This increase was due to growth in our installed customer base and slightly higher maintenance rates on most of our product lines.

~~Maintenance~~. We provide maintenance and support services for our software products and third party software. Maintenance revenues increased 28% and 27% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively compared to the prior year periods. Maintenance and support services grew 17% and 16% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, excluding the impact of acquisitions completed in the prior twelve months. This increase was due to growth in our installed customer base and slightly higher maintenance rates on most of our product lines.

~~Appraisal services~~. Appraisal services revenue increased 7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, and declined 14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to the prior year periods. The appraisal services business is driven in part by revaluation cycles in various states. In late 2007, we substantially completed several projects related to the Ohio revaluation cycle, which occurs every six years, as well as a few other large contracts. In mid-2008 we began a complete reappraisal of real property in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. This contract is valued at approximately $12.0 million and consists of two separate phases expected to be complete by late 2010. We continue to expect appraisal revenue for the full year 2008 will be moderately lower than 2007.

Appraisal services. Appraisal services revenue declined 11% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the prior year period and rose 3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the prior year period. The appraisal services business is somewhat cyclical and driven in part by scheduled revaluation cycles in various states. We substantially completed several large appraisal projects mid-2009. We began implementing several new revaluation contracts in the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margins

The following table sets forth a comparison of the key components of our cost of revenues, and those components stated as a percentage of related revenues for the periods presented as of September 30:

~~The following table sets forth a comparison of the key components of our cost of revenues, and those components stated as a percentage of related revenues for the periods presented as of September 30:~~


	Third Quarter										Nine Months
			% of					% of					% of					% of
			Related					Related					Related					Related
($ in thousands)	2009		Revenues			2008		Revenues			2009		Revenues			2008		Revenues

Software licenses	$	1,366		13	%	$	2,071		18	%	$	4,075		13	%	$	6,838		22	%
Acquired software		369		4			472		4			1,042		3			1,369		4
Software services, maintenance and subscriptions		35,259		61			31,988		63			102,520		62			93,555		65
Appraisal services		2,851		61			3,098		59			9,211		63			9,269		65
Hardware and other		1,252		70			1,058		71			3,697		76			3,684		72


Total cost of revenue	$	41,097		55	%	$	38,687		56	%	$	120,545		56	%	$	114,715		59	%

The following table sets forth a comparison of gross margin percentage by revenue type for the periods presented as of September 30:


	Third Quarter									Nine Months
Gross Margin percentages	2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change

Software licenses and acquired software		82.9	%		77.6	%		5.3	%		83.4	%		74.1	%		9.3	%
Software services, maintenance and subscriptions		38.9			36.6			2.3			38.1			35.3			2.8
Appraisal services		39.2			41.4			(2.2	)		37.1			34.9			2.2
Hardware and other		30.0			29.3			0.7			23.8			27.5			(3.7	)

Overall gross margin		44.7	%		43.6	%		1.1	%		44.2	%		41.3	%		2.9	%

Software licenses. Amortization expense for capitalized development costs on certain software products comprises approximately 15% of our cost of software license revenues in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to approximately 47% of our cost of software license in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The remaining balance is made up of third party software costs. Once a product is released, we begin to amortize the costs associated with its development over the estimated useful life of the product. Amortization expense is determined on a product-by-product basis at an annual rate not less than straight-line basis over the product’s estimated life, which is generally five years. Development costs consist mainly of personnel costs, such as salary and benefits paid to our developers, and rent for related office space.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, our software license gross margin percentage rose significantly compared to the prior year periods because several products became fully amortized in late 2008, as did software acquired related to a significant acquisition in December 2003.

Software services, maintenance and subscription-based services. Cost of software services, maintenance and subscriptions primarily consists of personnel costs related to installation of our software, conversion of customer data, training customer personnel and support activities and various other services such as ASP and disaster recovery. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the software services, maintenance and subscriptions gross margin increased 2.3% and 2.8%, respectively from the prior year periods partly because maintenance and various other services such as ASP and disaster recovery costs typically grow at a slower rate than related revenues due to leverage in the utilization of our support and maintenance staff and economies of scale. We have increased our implementation and support staff by 20 employees since September 30, 2008 in order to expand our capacity to implement our contract backlog. The software services, maintenance and subscription-based services gross margin also benefited from slightly higher rates for certain services.

In addition, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the gross margin included a benefit of approximately .6% which reflected the impact of revenue which had been deferred pending final acceptance on a certain contract. There were no related costs associated with this revenue in 2008.

Appraisal services. Our appraisal gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2009 declined compared to the prior year period. We substantially completed several large appraisal contracts mid-year 2009 but did not reduce our workforce because we expect to ramp up efforts on several new revaluations which began mid-year. Our appraisal gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased compared to the prior year period as the result of cost savings and operational efficiencies experienced on an unusually complex project.

Our blended gross margins for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were higher than the prior year due to lower amortization expense of software development costs described above. The gross margin for both periods also benefited from leverage in the utilization of our support and maintenance staff and economies of scale and slightly higher rates on certain services.

Third Quarter Nine Months
% of % of % of % of
Related Related Related Related
($ in thousands) 2008 Revenues 2007 Revenues 2008 Revenues 2007 Revenues

Software licenses $ 2,071 18 % $ 1,886 23 % $ 6,838 22 % $ 5,818 24 %
Acquired software 472 4 427 5 1,369 4 1,248 5
Software services, maintenance
and subscriptions 31,988 63 26,795 66 93,555 65 77,677 68
Appraisal services 3,098 59 3,248 66 9,269 65 11,340 69
Hardware and other 1,058 71 946 73 3,684 72 3,304 75

Total cost of revenue $ 38,687 56 % $ 33,302 61 % $ 114,715 59 % $ 99,387 62 %

~~The following table sets forth a comparison of gross margin percentage by revenue type for the periods presented as of September 30:~~

Third Quarter Nine Months
Gross Margin percentages 2008 2007 Change 2008 2007 Change

Software licenses and acquired software 77.6 % 71.6 % 6.0 % 74.1 % 71.1 % 3.0 %
Software services, maintenance and subscriptions 36.6 33.9 2.7 35.3 31.9 3.4
Appraisal services 41.4 34.1 7.3 34.9 31.3 3.6
Hardware and other 29.3 27.1 2.2 27.5 25.2 2.3

Overall gross margin 43.6 % 39.4 % 4.2 % 41.3 % 37.6 % 3.7 %

~~Software licenses~~. The main component of our cost of software license revenues is amortization expense for capitalized development costs on certain software products, with third party software costs making up the balance. Once a product is released, we begin to amortize the costs associated with its development over the estimated useful life of the product. Amortization expense is determined on a product-by-product basis at an annual rate not less than straight-line basis over the product’s estimated life, which is generally five years. Development costs consist mainly of personnel costs, such as salary and benefits paid to our developers, and rent for related office space.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, our software license gross margin percentage rose compared to the prior year periods due to strong license fee revenue increases. In addition, the three months ended September 30, 2008 benefitted from slightly lower software development amortization because certain software products became fully amortized during that period. The year-to-date gross margin grew at a slower rate because the first quarter product mix included more third party software, which has higher associated costs than proprietary software.

~~Software services, maintenance and subscription-based services~~. Cost of software services, maintenance and subscriptions primarily consists of personnel costs related to installation of our software, conversion of customer data, training customer personnel and support activities and various other services such as ASP and disaster recovery. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the software services, maintenance and subscriptions gross margin increased 2.7% and 3.4%, respectively from the prior year periods partly because maintenance and various other services such as ASP and disaster recovery costs typically grow at a slower rate than related revenues due to leverage in the utilization of our support and maintenance staff and economies of scale. We have increased our implementation and support staff by 225 full-time equivalent employees since September 30, 2007 in order to expand our capacity to implement our contract backlog. This increase includes 102 full-time equivalent employees related to acquisitions completed since September 30, 2007.

In addition, approximately 0.6% of the gross margin increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflects the impact of revenue which had been deferred pending final acceptance on a certain contract. There were no related costs associated with this revenue in 2008.

~~Appraisal services~~. A high proportion of the costs of appraisal services revenue are variable, as we often hire temporary employees to assist in appraisal projects whose term of employment generally ends with the projects’ completion. Our appraisal gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2008 is higher than the prior year period due to higher revenues associated with the Orleans Parish reappraisal project.

Our blended gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was higher than the prior year periods in part due to leverage in the utilization of our support and maintenance staff and economies of scale. The blended gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2008 also benefitted from a product mix that included more software license revenue, which inherently has higher gross margins, and less appraisal services revenue.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

The following table sets forth a comparison of our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the periods presented as of September 30:

~~The following table sets forth a comparison of our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the periods presented as of September 30:~~


	Third Quarter						Change					Nine Months						Change
($ in thousands)	2009			2008			$		%			2009			2008			$		%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	17,114		$	15,985		$	1,129		7	%	$	51,608		$	46,155		$	5,453		12	%

Percent of revenues		23.0	%		23.3	%							23.9	%		23.6	%

SG&A as a percentage of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 grew slightly from the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the increase in SG&A expenses was comprised of higher stock compensation expense, commission costs as well as marketing expenses. Marketing expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2009 include costs associated with the launch of a new corporate branding initiative.

Third Quarter Change Nine Months Change
($ in thousands) 2008 2007 $ % 2008 2007 $ %
Selling, general and
administrative expenses $ 15,985 $ 12,691 $ 3,294 26 % $ 46,155 $ 38,448 $ 7,707 20 %

Percent of revenues 23.3 % 23.1 % 23.6 % 24.1 %

SG&A as a percentage of revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 grew at a slower rate than the prior year periods due to significantly higher revenues and leverage in the utilization of our administrative and sales staff. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, our full-time equivalent SG&A employee count declined 2% from September 30, 2007.

Research and Development Expense

The following table sets forth a comparison of our research and development expense for the periods presented as of September 30:

~~The following table sets forth a comparison of our research and development expense for the periods presented as of September 30:~~


	Third Quarter						Change				Nine Months						Change				Third Quarter						Change					Nine Months						Change
($ in thousands)	2008			2007			$		%		2008			2007			$		%		2009			2008			$		%			2009			2008			$		%
Research and
development expense	$	1,416		$	639		$	777	122	%	$	5,485		$	3,266		$	2,219	68	%
Research and development expense																					$	2,973		$	1,416		$	1,557		110	%	$	8,047		$	5,485		$	2,562		47	%

Percent of revenues		2.1	%		1.2	%						2.8	%		2.0	%						4.0	%		2.1	%							3.7	%		2.8	%

Research and development expense consist mainly of costs associated with the Microsoft Dynamics AX project, in addition to costs associated with other new product development efforts. In January 2007, we entered into a strategic alliance with Microsoft Corporation to jointly develop core public sector functionality for Microsoft Dynamics AX to address the accounting needs of public sector organizations worldwide. ~~Research and development costs increased over the prior year periods because the Microsoft Dynamics AX development effort was not fully staffed until mid-2007.~~ In the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007,~~2008, we offset our research and development expense by ~~$987,000~~$2.6 million and ~~$883,000,~~$987,000, respectively, which were the amounts earned under the terms of our ~~research and development~~ agreement with Microsoft. We amended this agreement in September 2008 to define the scope of reimbursable development through the balance of the project and now expect to offset research and development expense by approximately $850,000 each quarter through the end of 2010. The actual amount and timing of future research and development costs and related reimbursements and whether they are capitalized or expensed may vary.

Non-Cash Legal Settlement Related to Warrants

Amortization of Customer and Trade Name Intangibles

Acquisition intangibles are composed of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible assets acquired that is allocated to acquired software and customer and trade name intangibles. The remaining excess purchase price is allocated to goodwill that is not subject to amortization. Amortization expense related to acquired software is included with cost of revenues while amortization expense of customer and trade name intangibles is recorded as a non-operating expense. The following table sets forth a comparison of amortization of customer and trade name intangibles for the periods presented as of September 30:


	Third Quarter				Change					Nine Months				Change
($ in thousands)	2009		2008		$		%			2009		2008		$		%
Amortization of customer and trade name intangibles	$	685	$	612	$	73		12	%	$	2,034	$	1,770	$	264		15	%

In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we completed several acquisitions and purchased certain software assets to compliment our tax and appraisal solutions and our student information management solutions. These transactions increased amortizable customer and trade name intangibles by approximately $625,000. This amount will be amortized over approximately 10 years.

Income Tax Provision

16The following table sets forth comparison of our income tax provision for the periods presented as of September 30:


	Third Quarter						Change						Nine Months						Change
($ in thousands)	2009			2008			$			%			2009			2008			$		%
Income tax provision	$	4,946		$	5,976		$	(1,030	)		(17	)%	$	13,362		$	9,700		$	3,662		38	%

Effective income tax rate		39.8	%		48.4	%								39.6	%		49.9	%

~~Amortization of Customer~~Our effective income tax rate decreased compared to the prior year periods due to a non-cash legal settlement in June 2008 related to warrants charge of $9.0 million, which was not deductible. The effective income tax rates for the three and ~~Trade Name Intangibles~~

Third Quarter Change Nine Months Change
($ in thousands) 2008 2007 $

% 2008 2007 $ %
Amortization of customer
and trade name intangibles $ 612 $ 372 $ 240 65 % $ 1,770 $ 1,075 $ 695 65 %

~~In the~~ nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 ~~we completed three acquisitions, which increased amortizable customer and trade name intangibles by $12.3 million. This amount will be amortized over approximately 11 years.~~

~~Income Tax Provision~~

~~The following table sets forth comparison of our income tax provision for the periods presented as of September 30:~~

Third Quarter Change Nine Months Change
($ in thousands) 2008 2007 $ % 2008 2007 $ %
Income tax provision $ 5,976 $ 3,209 $ 2,767 86 % $ 9,700 $ 7,141 $ 2,559 36 %

Effective income tax rate 48.4 % 38.3 % 49.9 % 38.7 %

Our effective income tax rate increased approximately twelve points compared to the prior year periods due to a non-cash legal settlement related to warrants charge of $9.0 million, which was not deductible. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were different from the statutory United States federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to a non-cash legal settlement related to warrants charge which was not deductible, as well as state income taxes, non-deductible share-based compensation expense, the qualified manufacturing activities deduction, and non-deductible meals and entertainment costs.

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

As of September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we had cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash equivalents) of ~~$28.9~~$7.9 million and ~~current and non-current~~ investments of ~~$5.4~~$2.1 million, compared to cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash equivalents) of ~~$14.1~~$6.8 million and ~~short-term~~ investments of ~~$41.6~~$4.6 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. As of September 30, ~~2008~~2009, we had outstanding borrowings of $2.1 million and unused borrowing capacity of $21.6 million under our revolving line of credit. In addition, as of September 30, 2009, we had issued outstanding letters of credit totaling ~~$5.1~~$7.3 million to secure surety bonds required by some of our customer contracts. These letters of credit have been collateralized by restricted cash balances of $6.0 million and $1.3 million of our available borrowing capacity and expire through ~~July 2009.~~mid-2010.

The following table sets forth a summary of cash flows for the ~~periods presented as of~~nine months ended September 30:


($ in thousands)	2009			2008
Cash flows provided by (used by):
Operating activities	$	31,249		$	45,399
Investing activities		(9,973	)		(7,348	)
Financing activities		(21,143	)		(23,914	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	133		$	14,137

Nine months ended September 30, 2008 2007

Cash flows provided by (used by):
Operating activities $ 45,399 $ 24,538
Investing activities (7,348 ) (20,035 )
Financing activities (23,914 ) (5,892 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 14,137 $ (1,389 )

~~Operating Activities~~

Net cash provided by operating activities continues to be our primary source of funds to finance operating needs and capital expenditures. Other capital resources include cash on hand, public and private issuances of debt and equity securities, and bank borrowings. The capital and credit markets have become more volatile and tight as a result of adverse conditions that have caused the failure and near failure of a number of large financial services companies. It is possible that our ability to access to the capital ~~markets.~~ and credit markets may be limited by these or other factors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at this time we believe that cash provided by operating activities, cash on hand and our revolving line of credit are sufficient to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures, income tax obligations, and share repurchases for the foreseeable future.

Operating Activities

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, operating activities provided net cash of ~~$45.4~~$31.2 million, primarily generated from net income of ~~$9.7 million, non-cash legal settlement related to warrants charge of $9.0~~$20.4 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization charges of ~~$9.0~~$7.1 million, non-cash share-based compensation expense of ~~$2.7~~$3.7 million, ~~and~~offset by a ~~decrease~~small increase in net operating assets of ~~$14.9 million.~~$700,000. Net cash provided by operating ~~assets~~activities declined ~~mainly~~approximately $14.1 million due to several factors. Accounts receivable as of September 30, 2009 included several large milestone and retainer billings. In addition maintenance billing activity in the three months ended September 30, 2009 was higher than the comparable prior year period due to an increased number of customers and a slight change in our maintenance billing cycle which shifted some maintenance billing from the second quarter to the third quarter. Cash from operations in the prior year period included several unusually large advance payments from customers.

~~As of September 30, 2008, we had $5.7 million of principal invested~~ We did not have any similar-sized advance payments from customers in ARS that had experienced failed auctions. Of this amount, we were able to liquidate $500,000 for cash at par during the period October 1, 2008 through October 17, 2008. The liquidity of ARS has been negatively impacted by the uncertainty in the credit markets and the exposure of these securities to the financial condition of bond insurance companies. We will not be able to liquidate any of our non-current ARS until a future auction is successful, the issuer calls the security, a buyer is found outside the auction process or the securities are redeemed. Based on our cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2008 and our expected operating cash flows, we do not anticipate the current lack of liquidity of these investments will have a material effect on our ability to conduct business.

2009.

Our days sales outstanding (“DSO”) was 104 days at September 30, 2009, 99 days at December 31, 2008 and 87 days at September 30, ~~2008 and 95 days at December 31, 2007. DSOs decreased compared to the fourth quarter of 2007 because of annual~~2008. Our maintenance billing ~~collections. Our maintenance billings~~cycles typically peak at their highest level in December and June of each year and are followed by collections in the subsequent quarter. As a result our DSO usually declines in the third quarter compared to the fourth quarter. However, our DSO remained higher than December due to several large milestone billings in the third quarter for which the revenue will be recognized in future periods as well as a slight change in our maintenance billing cycle which shifted some maintenance billing from the second quarter to the third quarter. DSO is calculated based on quarter-end accounts receivable divided by the quotient of annualized quarterly revenues divided by 360 days.

Our investments available-for-sale consist of auction rate municipal securities (“ARS”) which are collateralized debt obligations supported by municipal agencies and do not include mortgage-backed securities. All of our ARS are reflected at estimated fair value in the balance sheet at September 30, 2009. In prior periods, due to the auction process which took place every 28 to 35 days for most ARS, quoted market prices were readily available, which would have qualified as Level 1 as discussed in FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. However, due to the financial market crisis, the auction events for these securities have failed. Therefore, quoted prices in active markets are no longer available and we determined the estimated fair values of these securities as of September 30, 2009, utilizing a discounted trinomial model. The model considers the probability of three potential occurrences for each auction event through the maturity date of each ARS. The three potential outcomes for each auction are (i) successful auction/early redemption, (ii) failed auction and (iii) issuer default. Inputs in determining the probabilities of the potential outcomes include but are not limited to, the securities’ collateral, credit rating, insurance, issuer’s financial standing, contractual restrictions on disposition and the liquidity in the market. The fair value of each ARS is determined by summing the present value of the probability-weighted future principal and interest payments determined by the model.

Investing activities used cash of ~~$7.3~~$10.0 million in the nine months ending September 30, ~~2008~~2009 compared to ~~$20.0~~$7.3 million ~~cash used~~ for the same period in ~~2007.~~2008. In connection with plans to consolidate workforces and support planned long-term growth, we paid $6.8 million for construction of an office building in Lubbock, Texas and expect to pay an additional $5.0 million in the next three months to complete this construction. In the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we also liquidated $2.5 million of investments in ARS for cash at par. We also completed the acquisition of all of the capital stock of Assessment Evaluation Services, Inc. for $1.1 million in cash, paid $700,000 in cash for certain assets of KPL, Inc. d/b/a Parker-Lowe & Associates and acquired various software assets for $1.1 million in cash. In the comparable prior year period, we liquidated $35.9 million of short-term investments in ARS for cash at par, and we completed the acquisitions of School Information Systems, ~~Inc,~~Inc., VersaTrans Solutions Inc., and certain assets of Olympia Computing Company, Inc. d/b/a ~~Schoolmaster that expanded our presence in the education market.~~Schoolmaster. The combined purchase price, excluding cash acquired and including transaction costs, was approximately $23.9 million in cash and approximately 196,000 shares of Tyler common stock valued at $2.9 million. We also paid $2.5 million primarily for land in Lubbock, Texas in connection with a planned office development and paid $12.7 million for an office building, land, and a related tenant lease in Yarmouth, Maine. Capital expenditures and acquisitions were funded from cash generated from operations.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net cash used by investing activities of $20.0 million included cash payments of $9.0 million for the acquisitions of EDP Enterprises, Inc. and Advanced Data Systems, Inc., along with an office building. Other investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were primarily comprised of a net investment of $8.8 million in short term investments and investments of $2.6 million in property and equipment.

Financing activities used cash of ~~$23.9~~$21.1 million in the nine months ending September 30, ~~2008~~2009 compared to ~~$5.9~~$23.9 million in the same period for ~~2007.~~2008. Cash used in financing activities was primarily comprised of purchases of treasury shares, net of proceeds from stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan activity. These purchases were funded by short-term borrowings as well as cash from operations.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we purchased ~~2.2~~1.2 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of ~~$31.3~~$17.0 million. At September 30, ~~2008,~~2009, we had authorization to repurchase up to ~~1.6~~2.3 million additional shares of Tyler common stock. A summary of the repurchase activity during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008~~2009 is as follows:

Period
Total number
of shares
repurchased

Additional number
of shares authorized
that may be
repurchased

Average price
paid per share

Maximum number of
shares that may be
repurchased under
current authorization

January 1 through January 31 814 - $ 12.92 967
February 1 through February 29 - - - 967
March 1 through March 31 - - - 967
April 1 through April 30 - - - 967
Additional authorization by the board of directors - 2,000 - 2,967
May 1 through May 31 - - - 2,967
June 1 through June 30 283 - 13.80 2,684
July 1 through July 31 163 - 14.08 2,521
August 1 through August 31 15 - 15.41 2,506
September 1 through September 30 919 - 15.64 1,587
Total nine months ended September 30, 2008 2,194 2,000 $ 14.28

~~During the period October 1, 2008 through October 20, 2008 we purchased 1.5 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $20.6 million.~~


			Additional number				Maximum number of
	Total number		of shares authorized				shares that may be
	of shares		that may be		Average price		repurchased under
(Shares in thousands)	repurchased		repurchased		paid per share		current authorization
January 1 through January 31		266		—	$	11.93		1,232
February 1 through February 28		233		—		12.87		999
March 1 through March 31		208		—		12.79		791
April 1 through April 30		—		—		—		791
Additional authorization by the board of directors		—		2,000		—		2,791
May 1 through May 31		—		—		—		2,791
June 1 through June 30		8		—		15.28		2,783
July 1 through July 31		35		—		15.28		2,748
August 1 through August 31		485		—		15.50		2,263
September 1 through September 30		—		—		—		2,263

Total nine months ended September 30, 2009		1,235		2,000	$	13.77

The repurchase program, which was approved by our board of directors, was announced in October 2002, and was amended in April and July 2003, October 2004, October 2005, May 2007, May 2008 and May ~~2008. On October 23, 2008, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 2.0 million shares.~~2009. There is no expiration date specified for the authorization and we intend to repurchase stock under the plan from time to time in the future.

During the second quarter of 2008, we began construction of an office development located in Lubbock, Texas to consolidate our Lubbock based workforce and support planned long-term growth. The office development is scheduled for completion in early 2010 and expected to cost approximately $12.0 million to $13.0 million. As of September 30, 2008, we have paid $2.5 million, primarily for land. We expect to capitalize additional costs of approximately $1.0 million in 2008, related to the construction of this facility.

In July 2008 we paid $12.7 million for an office building and land in Yarmouth, Maine as part of a plan to consolidate our workforce in the Portland, Maine area and to support long-term growth. This building will be leased to third-party tenants through July 2011, at which time we expect to begin occupying the facility.

We also expect to purchase for approximately $10.0 million an office building in Falmouth, Maine that we currently lease from a related party. The building purchase is expected to close in the three months ended December 31, 2008.

None of these real estate investments are expected to preclude us from taking advantage of other opportunities to invest our cash in growing our business, and it is possible that we will leverage these assets in the future.

On October 20, 2008, we entered into a new revolving bank credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) and a related pledge and security agreement. The Credit Facility matures October 19, 2009 and provides for total borrowings of up to $25.0 million and a $6.0 million Letter of Credit facility under which the bank will issue cash collateralized letters of credit. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 1% or prime rate minus 1.5%. As of October 20, 2008, our effective interest rate was 3% under the Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2008 we had no debt and outstanding letters of credit totaling $5.1 million under a previous agreement to secure surety bonds required by some of our customer contracts. As of October 24, 2008 we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility.

We made federal and state income tax payments, net of refunds of ~~$10.1~~$13.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2008~~2009 compared to ~~$6.9~~$10.1 million in the comparable prior year.

Excluding acquisitions, we anticipate that 2009 capital spending will be between $14.0 million and $15.0 million. Approximately $12.0 million of these expenditures will be incurred to complete the construction of an office building in Lubbock, Texas. The remainder of our 2009 expenditures is primarily related to computer equipment and software for infrastructure expansions. We currently do not expect to capitalize significant amounts related to software development in 2009, but the actual amount and timing of those costs, and whether they are capitalized or expensed may result in additional capitalized software development. Capital spending in 2009 is expected to be funded from existing cash balances, cash flows from operations and our revolving line of credit.

From time to time we engage in discussions with potential acquisition candidates. In order to consummate any such opportunities, which could require significant commitments of ~~capital,~~capital; we may be required to incur debt or to issue additional potentially dilutive securities in the future. No assurance can be given as to our future acquisitions and how such acquisitions may be financed. In the absence of future acquisitions, we believe our current cash balances and expected future cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital, capital expenditures and other activities through the next twelve months. If operating cash flows are not sufficient to meet our needs, we may borrow under our revolving credit facility.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may affect us due to adverse changes in financial market prices and interest rates. WeOur investments available-for-sale consist of auction rate municipal securities (“ARS”) which are ~~exposed~~collateralized debt obligations supported by municipal agencies and do not include mortgage-backed securities.

All of our ARS are reflected at estimated fair value in the balance sheet at September 30, 2009. In prior periods, due to ~~risk related to our investments in ARS. Liquidity for ARS is typically provided by an~~the auction process ~~that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually~~which took place every 28 to 35 ~~days. Because of~~days for most ARS, quoted market prices were readily available, which would have qualified as Level 1 as discussed in FASB ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. However, due to the ~~short interest rate reset period, we have historically recorded ARS as short-term investments available-for-sale. The liquidity of ARS has been negatively impacted by~~financial market crisis, the ~~uncertainty in the credit markets and the exposure~~auction events for most of these securities have failed. Therefore, quoted prices in active markets are no longer available and we determined the estimated fair values of these securities as of September 30, 2009, utilizing a discounted trinomial model.

~~We have no outstanding debt at September 30, 2008, and are therefore not subject to any interest rate risk.~~

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. These include controls and procedures designed to ensure that ~~we are able~~this information is accumulated and communicated to ~~collect the information we are~~our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required ~~to disclose in the reports we file~~disclosures. Management, with the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and to process, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules~~participation of the ~~SEC. Based on an evaluation~~Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this ~~report conducted by our management, with the participation of~~report. Based on this evaluation the Chief Executive ~~and the Chief Financial~~ Officer ~~the Chief Executive~~ and Chief Financial Officer ~~believe~~have concluded that ~~these~~our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are ~~effective~~reasonably likely to ensure that we are able to collect, process and disclose the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within the required time periods.materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

On November 3, 2008, a putative collective action complaint was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Court”) on behalf of current and former “customer support analysts,” “client liaisons,” “engineers,” “trainers,” and “education services specialists.” The petition alleges that we misclassified these groups of employees as “exempt” rather than “non-exempt” under the Fair Labor Standards Act and that we therefore failed to properly pay overtime wages. The suit was initiated by six former employees working out of our Longview, Texas, office and seeks to recover damages in the form of lost overtime pay since October 31, 2005, liquidated damages equal to the amount of lost overtime pay, interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees. On June 23, 2009, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification for the purpose of providing notice to potential plaintiffs about the litigation. On September 22, 2009, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion to provide for additional email notice to potential plaintiffs and to extend the “opt in” period for an additional thirty days. We intend to vigorously defend the action. Given the preliminary nature of the alleged claims and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, we cannot at this time estimate the possible outcome of any such action.

Other than ordinary course, routine litigation incidental to our business and except as described in this Quarterly Report, there are no material legal proceedings pending to which we are party or to which any of our properties are subject.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, one should carefully consider the discussion of various risks and uncertainties contained in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our ~~2007~~2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe those risk factors are the most relevant to our business and could cause our results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made by us. Please note, however, that those are not the only risk factors facing us. Additional risks that we do not consider material, or of which we are not currently aware, may also have an adverse impact on us. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed if any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs or materializes. In that event, the market price for our common stock could decline, and our shareholders may lose all or part of their investment. During the first nine months of ~~2008,~~2009, there were no material changes in the information regarding risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

ITEM 5. Other Information

None

ITEM 6. Exhibits


Exhibit 4.1		Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Bank of Texas, ~~N.A.~~N. A. dated ~~October 20, 2008~~August 21, 2009.

	Exhibit 4.2		Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Bank of Texas, N. A. dated October 19, 2009.

Exhibit 4.3		First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement by and between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Bank of Texas, ~~N.A.~~N. A. dated October ~~20, 2008~~19, 2009.

	Exhibit 31.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	Exhibit 31.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	Exhibit 32.1		Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	~~TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

	~~By:~~TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	By:	/s/ Brian K. Miller
		Brian K. Miller
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and an authorized signatory)

Date: October ~~23, 2008~~27, 2009


	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. Financial Statements
	ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
	Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
	ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
	ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
	ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	ITEM 5. Other Information
	ITEM 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
EX-4.1
EX-4.2
EX-4.3
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Revenues:
Software licenses	$	11,372	$	8,145	$	31,646	$	24,431
Subscriptions		3,526		2,559		10,503		7,272
Software services		18,600		15,872		54,973		44,213
Maintenance		28,353		22,132		79,102		62,526
Appraisal services		5,289		4,927		14,249		16,514
Hardware and other		1,497		1,297		5,084		4,420
Total revenues		68,637		54,932		195,557		159,376

Cost of revenues:
Software licenses		2,071		1,886		6,838		5,818
Acquired software		472		427		1,369		1,248
Software services, maintenance and subscriptions		31,988		26,795		93,555		77,677
Appraisal services		3,098		3,248		9,269		11,340
Hardware and other		1,058		946		3,684		3,304
Total cost of revenues		38,687		33,302		114,715		99,387

Gross profit		29,950		21,630		80,842		59,989

Selling, general and administrative expenses		15,985		12,691		46,155		38,448
Research and development expense		1,416		639		5,485		3,266
Amortization of customer and trade name intangibles		612		372		1,770		1,075
Non-cash legal settlement related to warrants		-		-		9,045		-

Operating income		11,937		7,928		18,387		17,200

Other income, net		398		441		1,044		1,252
Income before income taxes		12,335		8,369		19,431		18,452
Income tax provision		5,976		3,209		9,700		7,141
Net income	$	6,359	$	5,160	$	9,731	$	11,311

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.17	$	0.13	$	0.26	$	0.29
Diluted	$	0.16	$	0.12	$	0.25	$	0.27

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		38,474		38,688		38,093		38,717
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		40,019		41,395		39,626		41,673

See accompanying notes.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value and share amounts)

	September 30,
	2008			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,779		$	9,642
Restricted cash equivalents		5,082			4,462
Short-term investments available-for-sale		500			41,590
Accounts receivable (less allowance for losses of $1,841 in 2008
and $1,851 in 2007)		66,430			63,965
Prepaid expenses		7,693			7,726
Other current assets		1,771			1,324
Deferred income taxes		1,839			2,355
Total current assets		107,094			131,064

Accounts receivable, long-term portion		681			398
Property and equipment, net		24,773			9,826
Non-current investments available-for-sale		4,893			-

Other assets:
Goodwill		88,733			71,677
Customer related intangibles, net		28,071			17,706
Software, net		7,034			9,588
Other intangibles, net		2,577			1,074
Sundry		220			175
	$	264,076		$	241,508

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2,590		$	3,323
Accrued liabilities		26,265			18,905
Deferred revenue		91,029			73,714
Income taxes payable		-			632
Total current liabilities		119,884			96,574

Deferred income taxes		8,889			7,723

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $10.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued		-			-
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
48,147,969 shares issued in 2008 and 2007		481			481
Additional paid-in capital		150,561			149,568
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(167	)		-
Retained earnings		45,363			35,632
Treasury stock, at cost; 10,321,534 and 9,528,467 shares in 2008
and 2007, respectively		(60,935	)		(48,470	)
Total shareholders' equity		135,303			137,211
	$	264,076		$	241,508

See accompanying notes.

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)



	Nine months ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,731		$	11,311
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		8,989			7,795
Non-cash legal settlement related to warrants		9,045			-
Share-based compensation expense		2,719			1,705
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of
effects of acquired companies:
Accounts receivable		63			6,532
Income tax receivable		(972	)		(800	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		515			504
Accounts payable		(833	)		(1,465	)
Accrued liabilities		3,555			(1,289	)
Deferred revenue		12,587			245
Net cash provided by operating activities		45,399			24,538

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments		44,565			21,103
Purchases of short-term investments		(8,625	)		(29,940	)
Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(23,868	)		(9,005	)
Investment in software development costs		-			(158	)
Additions to property and equipment		(17,375	)		(2,575	)
Acquired lease		(1,387	)		-
(Increase) decrease in restricted investments		(620	)		500
(Increase) decrease in other		(38	)		40
Net cash used by investing activities		(7,348	)		(20,035	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchase of treasury shares		(28,968	)		(11,134	)
Contributions from employee stock purchase plan		872			833
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		1,617			3,291
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation expense		560			1,118
Warrant exercise in connection with legal settlement		2,005			-
Net cash used by financing activities		(23,914	)		(5,892	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		14,137			(1,389	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		9,642			17,212

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	23,779		$	15,823


See accompanying notes.

			Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable inputs
	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents (1)	$	28,861	$	28,861	$	-	$	-
Short-term investments available-for-sale (1)		500		500		-		-
Non-current investments available-for-sale (2)		4,893		-		-		4,893
Total	$	34,254	$	29,361	$	-	$	4,893

	Three months ended			Nine months ended
Auction Rate Securities:	September 30, 2008			September 30, 2008
Balance at beginning of period	$	-		$	-
Transfers into level 3		5,150			5,150
Unrealized losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive income		(257	)		(257	)
Balance as of September 30, 2008	$	4,893		$	4,893

Period	Total number of shares repurchased	Additional number of shares authorized that may be repurchased		Average price paid per share	Maximum number of shares that may be repurchased under current authorization
January 1 through January 31	814	-	$	12.92	967
February 1 through February 29	-	-		-	967
March 1 through March 31	-	-		-	967
April 1 through April 30	-	-		-	967
Additional authorization by the board of directors	-	2,000		-	2,967
May 1 through May 31	-	-		-	2,967
June 1 through June 30	283	-		13.80	2,684
July 1 through July 31	163	-		14.08	2,521
August 1 through August 31	15	-		15.41	2,506
September 1 through September 30	919	-		15.64	1,587
Total nine months ended September 30, 2008	2,194	2,000	$	14.28