UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 20202021
Oror
[ ]_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ________.
Commission File Number: 0-12305
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New York | 13-3044880 |
|
|
(State or | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
24 Carpenter Road, Chester, New York | 10918 |
(Address of | (Zip Code) |
(845) (845) 469-2042
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Addressname, former address and Former Fiscal Year,former fiscal year, if Changed Since Last Report)changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| KRMD | The Nasdaq Stock Market |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] [X]Yes [ ] [_] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). [X] [X]Yes [ ] [_] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer | |
Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company | |
Emerging growth company [ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ][_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ][_] Yes [X] [X]No
As of August 5, 2020, 43,909,57011, 2021, shares of common stock, $0.01$ par value per share, were outstanding, which excludes 2,737,231 shares of treasury stock.
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE | ||||
| ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||
| ||||
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 3 | ||
|
| |||
Balance Sheets as of June 30, | 3 | |||
Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, | 4 | |||
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, | 5 | |||
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 | 6 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements |
| |||
ITEM 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
| ||
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
| ||
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures |
| ||
PART | ||||
ITEM 1. | Legal Proceedings |
| ||
ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors |
| ||
ITEM 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
| ||
ITEM 6. | Exhibits |
| ||
Signatures | 23 |
- 2 -
PART I –— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| June 30, |
|
|
| ||
|
| 2020 |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
| (Unaudited) |
| 2019 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 38,129,349 |
| $ | 5,870,929 |
|
Accounts receivable less allowance for doubtful accounts of $32,645 at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 |
|
| 2,965,902 |
|
| 3,234,521 |
|
Inventory |
|
| 3,667,288 |
|
| 2,388,477 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
| 543,482 |
|
| 387,396 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
| 45,306,021 |
|
| 11,881,323 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
| 818,064 |
|
| 611,846 |
|
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $319,120 and $288,967 at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively |
|
| 926,504 |
|
| 807,135 |
|
Right of use assets, net |
|
| 306,101 |
|
| 373,734 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
| 334,011 |
|
| 188,241 |
|
Other assets |
|
| 19,812 |
|
| 19,582 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
| $ | 47,710,513 |
| $ | 13,881,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit payable |
| $ | 3,500,000 |
| $ | — |
|
Accounts payable |
|
| 920,006 |
|
| 572,656 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
| 2,686,200 |
|
| 1,296,612 |
|
Accrued payroll and related taxes |
|
| 523,537 |
|
| 190,265 |
|
Accrued tax liability |
|
| 523,190 |
|
| 204,572 |
|
Finance lease liability - current |
|
| 3,195 |
|
| 5,296 |
|
Operating lease liability - current |
|
| 139,618 |
|
| 136,888 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
| 8,295,746 |
|
| 2,406,289 |
|
Finance lease liability, net of current portion |
|
| 1,030 |
|
| 2,646 |
|
Operating lease liability, net of current portion |
|
| 166,483 |
|
| 236,846 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
| 8,463,259 |
|
| 2,645,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized, 46,640,120 and 42,239,788 shares issued, 43,902,889 and 39,502,557 shares outstanding at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively |
|
| 466,401 |
|
| 422,398 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
| 34,886,850 |
|
| 6,293,069 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
| 4,238,207 |
|
| 4,864,817 |
|
|
|
| 39,591,458 |
|
| 11,580,284 |
|
Less: Treasury stock, 2,737,231 shares at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, at cost |
|
| (344,204 | ) |
| (344,204 | ) |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
| 39,247,254 |
|
| 11,236,080 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
| $ | 47,710,513 |
| $ | 13,881,861 |
|
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 26,538,478 | $ | 27,315,286 | |||
Accounts receivable less allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,469 for June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020 | 2,577,400 | 2,572,954 | |||||
Inventory | 7,562,750 | 6,829,772 | |||||
Prepaid expenses | 461,553 | 807,780 | |||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 37,140,181 | 37,525,792 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 1,110,550 | 1,167,623 | |||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $232,820 and $199,899 at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively | 834,644 | 843,587 | |||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets | 166,483 | 236,846 | |||||
Deferred income tax assets, net | 1,327,230 | 125,274 | |||||
Other assets | 19,812 | 19,812 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 40,598,900 | $ | 39,918,934 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,005,653 | $ | 624,920 | |||
Accrued expenses | 1,771,666 | 2,610,413 | |||||
Accrued payroll and related taxes | 390,326 | 287,130 | |||||
Finance lease liability – current | 1,030 | 2,646 | |||||
Operating lease liability – current | 142,450 | 141,293 | |||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 3,311,125 | 3,666,402 | |||||
Operating lease liability, net of current portion | 24,033 | 95,553 | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 3,335,158 | 3,761,955 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 3) | — | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
Common stock, $ | par value, shares authorized, and shares issued and shares outstanding at June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively479,106 | 466,801 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 39,376,131 | 35,880,986 | |||||
Treasury stock, | shares at June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, at cost(3,843,562 | ) | (3,843,562 | ) | |||
Retained earnings | 1,252,067 | 3,652,754 | |||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | 37,263,742 | 36,156,979 | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 40,598,900 | $ | 39,918,934 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statementsstatements.
- 3 -
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(Unaudited)
|
| For the |
| For the |
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
NET SALES |
| $ | 7,708,904 |
| $ | 5,348,812 |
| $ | 14,038,913 |
| $ | 10,323,090 |
| $ | 5,528,174 | $ | 7,708,904 | $ | 10,959,125 | $ | 14,038,913 | |||||
Cost of goods sold |
|
| 2,799,024 |
|
| 1,873,148 |
|
| 5,340,823 |
|
| 3,799,472 |
| 2,317,990 | 2,799,024 | 4,517,087 | 5,340,823 | |||||||||
Gross Profit |
|
| 4,909,880 |
|
| 3,475,664 |
|
| 8,698,090 |
|
| 6,523,618 |
| 3,210,184 | 4,909,880 | 6,442,038 | 8,698,090 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
| 3,201,831 |
|
| 2,050,435 |
|
| 5,964,811 |
|
| 4,535,303 |
| 4,085,945 | 3,201,831 | 9,078,774 | 5,964,811 | |||||||||
Litigation |
|
| 2,346,914 |
|
| 1,124,947 |
|
| 2,446,072 |
|
| 1,617,462 |
| — | 2,346,914 | — | 2,446,072 | |||||||||
Research and development |
|
| 298,196 |
|
| 178,235 |
|
| 554,221 |
|
| 280,194 |
| 386,878 | 298,196 | 723,719 | 554,221 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 94,940 |
|
| 86,169 |
|
| 182,164 |
|
| 169,820 |
| 118,415 | 94,940 | 233,888 | 182,164 | |||||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
|
| 5,941,881 |
|
| 3,439,786 |
|
| 9,147,268 |
|
| 6,602,779 |
| 4,591,238 | 5,941,881 | 10,036,381 | 9,147,268 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net Operating (Loss)/Profit |
|
| (1,032,001 | ) |
| 35,878 |
|
| (449,178 | ) |
| (79,161 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Operating Loss | (1,381,054 | ) | (1,032,001 | ) | (3,594,343 | ) | (449,178 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Non-Operating (Expense)/Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Loss on currency exchange |
|
| (2,594 | ) |
| (1,235 | ) |
| (13,091 | ) |
| (10,925 | ) | |||||||||||||
(Loss)/Gain on disposal of fixed asset, net |
|
| (5,522 | ) |
| 49,980 |
|
| (5,522 | ) |
| 49,740 |
| |||||||||||||
Interest, net and other income, net |
|
| (5,002 | ) |
| 18,243 |
|
| 14,028 |
|
| 35,723 |
| |||||||||||||
TOTAL OTHER (EXPENSE)/INCOME |
|
| (13,118 | ) |
| 66,988 |
|
| (4,585 | ) |
| 74,538 |
| |||||||||||||
Non-Operating Income/(Expense) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain/(Loss) on currency exchange | 1,239 | (2,594 | ) | (14,478 | ) | (13,091 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Loss)/Gain on disposal of fixed assets, net | — | (5,522 | ) | 736 | (5,522 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income, net | 9,950 | (5,002 | ) | 19,721 | 14,028 | |||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE) | 11,189 | (13,118 | ) | 5,979 | (4,585 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
(LOSS)/INCOME BEFORE TAXES |
|
| (1,045,119 | ) |
| 102,866 |
|
| (453,763 | ) |
| (4,623 | ) | |||||||||||||
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | (1,369,865 | ) | (1,045,119 | ) | (3,588,364 | ) | (453,763 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense |
|
| (30,919 | ) |
| (24,683 | ) |
| (172,847 | ) |
| (2,584 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income Tax Benefit/(Expense) | 245,316 | (30,919 | ) | 1,187,677 | (172,847 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
NET (LOSS)/INCOME |
| $ | (1,076,038 | ) | $ | 78,183 |
| $ | (626,610 | ) | $ | (7,207 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET LOSS | $ | (1,124,549 | ) | $ | (1,076,038 | ) | $ | (2,400,687 | ) | $ | (626,610 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
NET (LOSS)/INCOME PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
NET LOSS PER SHARE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Basic |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.00 |
| $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.00 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | |
Diluted |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.00 |
| $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.00 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Basic |
|
| 40,361,924 |
|
| 38,353,000 |
|
| 40,018,559 |
|
| 38,279,718 |
| 44,489,853 | 40,361,924 | 44,226,936 | 40,018,559 | |||||||||
Diluted |
|
| 40,524,754 |
|
| 39,299,800 |
|
| 40,201,134 |
|
| 39,219,752 |
| 44,489,853 | 40,361,924 | 44,226,936 | 40,018,559 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statementsstatements.
- 4 -
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Net Loss | $ | (2,400,687 | ) | $ | (626,610 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,339,356 | 784,821 | |||||
Stock-based litigation settlement expense | — | 1,285,102 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 233,888 | 182,164 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | (1,201,956 | ) | (145,770 | ) | |||
(Gain)/Loss on disposal of fixed assets | (736 | ) | 5,522 | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
(Increase)/Decrease in accounts receivable | (4,446 | ) | 268,619 | ||||
Increase in inventory | (732,978 | ) | (1,278,811 | ) | |||
Decrease/(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets | 346,227 | (156,316 | ) | ||||
Increase in accounts payable | 380,733 | 347,350 | |||||
Increase in accrued payroll and related taxes | 103,196 | 333,272 | |||||
(Decrease)/Increase in accrued expenses | (838,747 | ) | 1,389,588 | ||||
Increase in accrued tax liability | — | 318,618 | |||||
NET CASH (USED IN)/PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | (2,776,150 | ) | 2,707,549 | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (152,223 | ) | (363,750 | ) | |||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | 9,065 | — | |||||
Purchases of intangible assets | (23,978 | ) | (149,523 | ) | |||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | (167,136 | ) | (513,273 | ) | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Borrowings from indebtedness | — | 3,500,000 | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of equity | 1,230,000 | 26,567,861 | |||||
Common stock issuance as settlement for litigation | 938,094 | — | |||||
Payments on finance lease liability | (1,616 | ) | (3,717 | ) | |||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | 2,166,478 | 30,064,144 | |||||
NET (DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (776,808 | ) | 32,258,420 | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | 27,315,286 | 5,870,929 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | $ | 26,538,478 | $ | 38,129,349 | |||
Supplemental Information | |||||||
Cash paid during the periods for: | |||||||
Interest | $ | 47 | $ | 13,554 | |||
Income Taxes | $ | 850 | $ | — | |||
Schedule of Non-Cash Operating, Investing and Financing Activities: | |||||||
Issuance of common stock as compensation | $ | 153,446 | $ | 120,004 | |||
Issuance of common stock as settlement for litigation | $ | 938,094 | $ | 938,094 |
|
| For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| June 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
| $ | (626,610 | ) | $ | (7,207 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
| 784,821 |
|
| 529,538 |
|
Stock based litigation settlement expense |
|
| 1,285,102 |
|
| — |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
| 182,164 |
|
| 169,820 |
|
Deferred capital gain - building lease |
|
| — |
|
| (3,763 | ) |
Deferred taxes |
|
| (145,770 | ) |
| 66,494 |
|
Loss/(Gain) on disposal of fixed asset |
|
| 5,522 |
|
| (49,740 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(Increase) in accounts receivable |
|
| 268,619 |
|
| (1,867,342 | ) |
Increase in inventory |
|
| (1,278,811 | ) |
| (467,706 | ) |
(Increase)/Decrease in prepaid expense and other assets |
|
| (156,316 | ) |
| 44,874 |
|
Increase in accounts payable |
|
| 347,350 |
|
| 76,882 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) in accrued payroll and related taxes |
|
| 333,272 |
|
| (249,730 | ) |
Increase in accrued expense |
|
| 1,389,588 |
|
| 346,181 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) in accrued tax liability |
|
| 318,618 |
|
| (72,210 | ) |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
| 2,707,549 |
|
| (1,483,909 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for capital expenditures |
|
| (363,750 | ) |
| (67,079 | ) |
Payments for patents |
|
| (149,523 | ) |
| (136,182 | ) |
Proceeds on disposal of fixed asset |
|
| — |
|
| 217,821 |
|
Proceeds from certificate of deposit |
|
| — |
|
| 1,517,927 |
|
NET CASH (USED IN)/PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
| (513,273 | ) |
| 1,532,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit advance |
|
| 3,500,000 |
|
| — |
|
Issuance of equity |
|
| 26,567,861 |
|
| 24,700 |
|
Payment for cancelled shares |
|
| — |
|
| (2,820 | ) |
Finance lease |
|
| (3,717 | ) |
| (2,069 | ) |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
| 30,064,144 |
|
| 19,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
| 32,258,420 |
|
| 68,389 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
| 5,870,929 |
|
| 3,738,803 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
| $ | 38,129,349 |
| $ | 3,807,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the periods for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
| $ | 13,554 |
| $ | 233 |
|
Taxes |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock as compensation |
| $ | 120,004 |
| $ | 212,898 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statementsstatements.
- 5 -
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury | Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Equity | |||||||||||||
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2020 | 46,680,119 | $ | 466,801 | $ | 35,880,986 | $ | 3,652,754 | $ | (3,843,562 | ) | $ | 36,156,979 | ||||||
Issuance of stock-based compensation | 10,124 | 101 | 56,149 | — | — | 56,250 | ||||||||||||
Compensation expense related to stock options | — | — | 677,934 | — | — | 677,934 | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement share issuance | 95,238 | 952 | 937,142 | — | — | 938,094 | ||||||||||||
Issuance upon options exercised | 1,110,580 | 11,106 | 1,218,894 | — | — | 1,230,000 | ||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | (1,276,138 | ) | — | (1,276,138 | ) | ||||||||||
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2021 | 47,896,061 | $ | 478,960 | $ | 38,771,105 | $ | 2,376,616 | $ | (3,843,562 | ) | $ | 37,783,119 | ||||||
Issuance of stock-based compensation | 14,615 | 146 | 97,050 | — | — | 97,196 | ||||||||||||
Compensation expense related to stock options | — | — | 441,841 | — | — | 441,841 | ||||||||||||
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards | — | — | 66,135 | — | — | 66,135 | ||||||||||||
Issuance upon options exercised | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (1,124,549 | ) | — | (1,124,549 | ) | ||||||||||
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2021 | 47,910,676 | $ | 479,106 | $ | 39,376,131 | $ | 1,252,067 | $ | (3,843,562 | ) | $ | 37,263,742 |
Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury | Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Equity | |||||||||||||
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019 | 42,239,788 | $ | 422,398 | $ | 6,293,069 | $ | 4,864,817 | $ | (344,204 | ) | $ | 11,236,080 | ||||||
Issuance of stock-based compensation | 9,189 | 92 | 59,910 | — | — | 60,002 | ||||||||||||
Compensation expense related to stock options | — | — | 300,966 | — | — | 300,966 | ||||||||||||
Issuance upon options exercised | 175,000 | 1,750 | 83,750 | — | — | 85,500 | ||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 449,428 | — | 449,428 | ||||||||||||
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2020 | 42,423,977 | $ | 424,240 | $ | 6,737,695 | $ | 5,314,245 | $ | (344,204 | ) | $ | 12,131,976 | ||||||
Issuance of stock-based compensation | 7,999 | 80 | 59,922 | — | — | 60,002 | ||||||||||||
Compensation expense related to stock options | — | — | 363,851 | — | — | 363,851 | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement options | — | — | 347,008 | — | — | 347,008 | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement share issuance | 95,238 | 952 | 937,142 | — | — | 938,094 | ||||||||||||
Issuance upon options exercised | 519,156 | 5,192 | 5,189 | — | — | 10,381 | ||||||||||||
Capital raise | 3,593,750 | 35,937 | 26,436,043 | — | — | 26,471,980 | ||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (1,076,038 | ) | — | (1,076,038 | ) | ||||||||||
BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2020 | 46,640,120 | $ | 466,401 | $ | 34,886,850 | $ | 4,238,207 | $ | (344,204 | ) | $ | 39,247,254 |
- 6 -
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a KORU Medical Systems (the “Company”,“Company,” “KORU Medical”Medical,” “we,” “us” or “we”“our”) designs, manufactures and markets proprietary portable and innovative medical devices primarily for the ambulatory infusion market as governed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) quality and regulatory system and international standards for quality system management. The Company operates as one segment.
FISCAL YEAR END
The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited financial statements as of June 30, 2020, have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and with instructions to SEC regulation S-X for interim financial statements.
In the opinion of the Company’s management, the financial statements contain all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2020, and the results of operations and cash flow for the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2020, and 2019.
The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“Annual Report”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from the accompanying financial statements. The accompanying year-end balance sheet was derived from the audited financial statements included in the Annual Report. The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited and notes theretoreflect all adjustments which are in the opinion of management necessary for a fair statement of the Company and management’s discussion and analysis ofCompany’s financial condition andposition, results of operations, included in the Company’s Annual Reportand cash flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, as filed withperiods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The Company’s results of operations and cash flows for the Securitiesinterim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K.cash flows that it may achieve in future periods.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company holds cash in excess of $250,000$250,000 at its depository, which exceeds the FDIC insurance limits and is, therefore, uninsured.
CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITINVENTORY
The certificate of deposit was recorded at cost plus accrued interest. The certificate of deposit earned interest at a rate of 1.73% and matured in May 2019.
INVENTORY
Inventories of raw materials are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates average cost, or market value including allocable overhead. Work-in-process and finished goods are stated at the lower of standard cost or market value and include direct labor and allocable overhead.
PATENTS
Costs incurred in obtaining patents have been capitalized and are being amortized over the legal life of the patents.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.
- 6 -
The Company believes that it has no uncertain tax positions requiring disclosure or adjustment. Generally, tax years starting with 20172018 are subject to examination by income tax authorities.
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT, AND DEPRECIATION
Property and equipment is stated at cost and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.
The Company maintains a stock option plan under which it grants stock options to certain executives, key employees and consultants. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. All options are charged against income at their fair value. The entire compensation expense of the award is recognized over the vesting period. Shares of stock granted for director fees are recorded at the fair value of the shares at the grant date.
- 7 -
The Company also maintains an omnibus equity incentive plan. There have been no awards made pursuant to this plan.
The Company issues restricted stock awards. Restricted stock awards are equity classified and measured at the fair market value of the underlying stock at the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock awards vesting at certain market capitalization thresholds were estimated on the date of grant using the Brownian Motion Monte Carlo lattice model. The fair value of restricted stock awards with time-based vesting were estimated on the date of grant at the current stock price. We recognize restricted stock expense using the straight-line attribution method over the requisite service period and account for forfeitures as they occur.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,124,549 | ) | $ | (1,076,038 | ) | $ | (2,400,687 | ) | $ | (626,610 | ) | |
Weighted Average Outstanding Shares: | |||||||||||||
Outstanding shares | 44,489,853 | 40,361,924 | 44,226,936 | 40,018,559 | |||||||||
Option shares includable | — | (a) | — | (a) | — | (a) | — | (a) | |||||
44,489,853 | 40,361,924 | 44,226,936 | 40,018,559 | ||||||||||
Net loss per share | |||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | |
Diluted | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) |
__________
(a) | For the three months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020, option shares of | and respectively, were not included as the impact is anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020, option shares of and respectively, were not included as the impact is anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, restricted shares of 1,000,000 and zero respectively, were not included as the impact is anti-dilutive.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Important estimates include but are not limited to asset lives, valuation allowances, inventory valuation, and accruals.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09—2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. We adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018, on a full retrospective basis. Adoption of this standard did not result in significant changes to our accounting policies, business processes, systems or controls, or have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows or related disclosures. As such, prior period financial statements were not recast.
The Company’s revenues result from the sale of assembled products. We recognize revenues when shipment occurs, and at which point the customer obtains control and ownership of the goods. Shipping costs generally are billed to customers and are included in sales.
The Company generally does not accept return of goods shipped unless it is a Company error. The only credits provided to customers are for defective merchandise. The Company warrants the syringe driver from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use and the warranty does not include a performance obligation. The costs under the warranty are expensed as incurred.
- 8 -
Provisions for distributor pricing and annual customer volumegrowth rebates are variable consideration and are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period the related sales are recorded or when it’sit is probable the annual growth target will be achieved. Rebates are provided to distributors for the difference in selling price to distributor and pricing specified to select customers.
LEASESThe following table summarizes net sales by geography for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
Sales | |||||||||||||
Domestic | $ | 4,645,770 | $ | 6,745,810 | $ | 9,092,559 | $ | 12,086,676 | |||||
International | 882,404 | 963,094 | 1,866,566 | 1,952,237 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 5,528,174 | $ | 7,708,904 | $ | 10,959,125 | $ | 14,038,913 |
LEASES
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard related to leases to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Most prominent among the changes in the standard is the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities by the Company for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP, while our accounting for capital leases remains substantially unchanged. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The standard became effective for us on January 1, 2019. The standard had a material impact on our balance sheet,sheets but did not have a material impact on our income statements.statements of operations. See NOTE“NOTE 6 LEASES.— LEASES” for further detail.
- 7 -
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS RECENTLY ADOPTED
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions including the exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2021, and it had no impact on our financial statement disclosures.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13—2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326);: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. For assets held at amortized cost basis, Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net amount expected to be collected. For available for sale debt securities, credit losses should be measured in a manner similar to current GAAP, however Topic 326 will require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. This ASU affects entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of the ASU on its financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.
In December 2019,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12 Income Taxes2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting848), which provided elective amendments for Income Taxes.entities that have contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions including the exceptionmay be applied to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year. The amendments also improve consistent application ofimpacted contracts and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning afterhedges prospectively through December 15, 2020.31, 2022. The Company is assessingcurrently evaluating the impact of the adoption of the ASUthis guidance will have on its financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.statements.
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all recently issued accounting pronouncements. Recent accounting pronouncements not specifically identified in our disclosures are either not applicable to the Company or are not expected to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
- 9 -
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSMEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability. Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined using assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value should maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. To measure fair value, the Company uses the following fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable:
• | Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
• | Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques and includes instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. |
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet forof cash trade receivables,and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximateare considered to be representative of their fair values because of the short-term nature of those instruments. There were no transfers between levels in the fair value based onhierarchy during the short-term maturity of these instruments.six months ended June 30, 2021.
ACCOUNTING FORIMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment at least annuallywhenever events or whenever thechanges in circumstances and situations change such that there is an indicationindicate that the carrying amountsamount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. AsAn impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the carrying amount. The impairment loss, if recognized, would be based on the excess of the carrying value of the impaired asset over its respective fair value. No impairment losses have been recorded through June 30, 2020, the Company does not believe that any of its assets are impaired.2021.
RECLASSIFICATION
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period data to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported net income.
NOTE 2 — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of the following at:
June 30, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
|
| June 30, 2020 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Furniture, office equipment, and leasehold improvements |
|
| 1,213,254 |
|
| 1,135,107 |
| |||||||
Furniture and office equipment | $ | 787,694 | $ | 753,536 | ||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 556,907 | 542,796 | ||||||||||||
Manufacturing equipment and tooling |
|
| 1,481,100 |
|
| 1,295,978 |
| 1,922,196 | 1,856,909 | |||||
|
|
| 2,694,354 |
|
| 2,431,085 |
| |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
| (1,876,290 | ) |
| (1,819,239 | ) | |||||||
Total property and equipment | 3,266,797 | 3,153,241 | ||||||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (2,156,247 | ) | (1,985,618 | ) | ||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| $ | 818,064 |
| $ | 611,846 |
| $ | 1,110,550 | $ | 1,167,623 |
Depreciation expense was $79,245$100,564 and $75,073$79,245 for the three months ended June 30, 20202021 and 2019,2020, respectively, and $152,013$200,967 and $148,588$152,013 for the six months ended June 30, 20202021 and 2019,2020, respectively.
- 8 -
NOTE 3 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From 2013 until May 2020, we wereThe Company has been and may again become involved in several lawsuits with our principal competitor, EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”). EMED allegedlegal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. KORU Medical is not presently a party to any litigation or other legal proceeding that our needle sets infringed various patents controlled by EMED. Certainis believed to be material to its financial condition.
- 10 -
On July 12, 2021, the lead plaintiff filed a notice of these lawsuits also alleged antitrust violations, unfair business practices, and various other business tort claims. On May 26, 2020, the parties announced the settlement of allvoluntary dismissal without prejudice of the litigation between KORU Medical and EMED. The settlement agreement provides KORU Medical with freedom to operate under EMED’s existing patent portfolio, dismissal of all litigation with prejudice (including the claims against Andrew Sealfon, our former President and Chief Executive Officer), and an equity payment by KORU Medical to EMED. The settled litigation is described below.
The initial case involving EMED was filed by us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on September 20, 2013 (the “California case”),previously disclosed putative class action lawsuit filed in response to a letter from EMED claiming patent infringement by us, and sought a declaratory judgment establishing the invalidity of the patent referenced in the letter – EMED’s US patent 8,500,703 – “’703.” EMED answered the complaint and asserted patent infringement of the ’703 patent and several counterclaims relating generally to claims of unfair business practices against us. We responded by adding several claims against EMED, generally relating to claims of unfair business practices on EMED’s part. On June 16, 2015, the California court entered a preliminary injunction against KORU Medical for making certain statements regarding products cleared for use by the FDA, or that could be safely used, with KORU Medical’s Freedom60 pump, without voiding the product warranty. On September 11, 2015, we requested an ex parte reexamination of the ’703 patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The ex parte reexamination resulted in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO determining that claims 1-10 of the ’703 patent are invalid, leaving claim 11 as the only surviving claim of the ’703 patent. Claim 11 of the ’703 patent, however, was not asserted in the California case. EMED informed KORU Medical it will neither appeal the PTAB’s decision nor pursue a claim based on infringement of claim 11 of the ’703 patent in the California case.
The second court case was filed by EMED in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Texas Court”) on June 25, 2015, claiming patent infringement on another of its patents (US 8,961,476 – “’476”), by our needle sets, and seeking unspecified monetary damages (“ED Texas ’476 matter”). This ’476 patent is related to the invalid claims of the EMED ’703 patent.
On September 17, 2015, we requested an inter partes review (“IPR”) of the ’476 patent, and subsequently after a trial the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision in our favor, invalidating all claims but one (“dependent Claim 9”) of the ’476 patent. EMED appealed the PTAB’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “CAFC”), which affirmed the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in our favor on April 3, 2018.
During the IPR proceedings regarding the ’476 patent, EMED filed a new patent application that subsequently issued as US 9,808,576 – “’576” on November 7, 2017. On this same date, EMED filed a new case (the “third case”) in the Texas Court claiming patent infringement of the ’576 patent by our needle sets, and seeking unspecified damages and a preliminary injunction against marketing and sales of our needle sets. We moved to dismiss or transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), which resulted inagainst the transfer of the third case to SDNY (“SDNY ’576 matter”) on May 30, 2018.
On April 23, 2018, EMED filed a new civil case (the “fourth case”) against us in the Texas Court asserting antitrust, defamationCompany and unfair business practice claims,its Chief Financial Officer and seeking unspecified damages, similar to those previously presented in the California case, described above. The fourth case also named Andrew Sealfon, then President andformer Chief Executive Officer, of KORUalleging they made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations and prospects, in the Company’s earnings communications and Form 10-Q filed during the period August 4, 2020 and January 25, 2021.
OTHER
On November 11, 2020, the Company entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Command Medical individually as a defendant. Following a hearing heldProducts, Inc. (“Command”), pursuant to which Command has agreed to manufacture and supply the Company’s subassemblies, needle sets and tubing products pursuant to the Company’s specifications and purchase orders. The first binding purchase order pursuant to the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement was made on November 14, 2018 to address17, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).
The Manufacturing and Supply Agreement provides for a motion we had filed to transfer venue, on December 7, 2018,term of five years from the Texas Court transferredEffective Date. Either party may terminate the fourth case toManufacturing and Supply Agreement upon a material breach by the United States District Court forother Party that has not been cured within 90 days, upon the Eastern District of California (the “California Court”). We then moved to dismiss that complaint, and Andrew Sealfon filed a separate motion to dismiss the case as to him for lack of jurisdiction.
- 9 -
At the same hearing on November 14, 2018, the Texas Court granted EMED leave to amend its infringement contentions to assert infringement of that sole remaining claim 9bankruptcy or insolvency of the ’476 patent. In April 2019, EMED served its damages expert’s report opining that EMED’s past infringement damages amount to $1.5 million, and in May KORU Medical served its damages expert’s rebuttal report opining that EMED’s expert miscalculated damages which if properly calculated would amount to less than $100,000. We moved to dismiss the case for lack of infringement. On June 24, 2019, the Texas Court Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation decision granting summary judgment in our favor, finding no infringement, literallyother Party or under the doctrine of equivalents, by KORU Medical’s accused products. EMED’s objections were overruled and on June 28, 2019, the Texas Court issued a Final Judgment in favor of KORU Medical, awarded court costs to KORU Medical, and dismissed the case. A final judgment was entered and KORU Medical submitted its Bill of Costs for approximately $16,000, which was ordered granted by the Texas Court. KORU Medical also moved to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of approximately $2.5 million in defense of EMED’s assertion of the ’476 Patent. EMED appealed the non-infringement judgment to the CAFC. On April 9, 2020, the CAFC issued a unanimous decision affirming the Texas Court’s judgment of non-infringement. The Texas Court had stayed proceedingsas expressly set forth elsewhere in the district court untilAgreement. If the appeal process was completed.Company terminates the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement other than for those reasons within the first three years from the Effective Date, the Company is obligated to pay an early termination fee to Command.
The SDNY ’576 matter proceeded in the New York court through claim construction on the ’576 Patent, whereupon KORU Medical filed a motion for summary judgement of non-infringement. That motion was granted on August 30, 2019,Manufacturing and the New York court dismissed the lawsuitSupply Agreement also includes customary provisions relating to, among other things, delivery, inspection procedures, warranties, quality management, business continuity plans, handling and entered a final judgement. KORU Medical submitted a Bill of Costs for approximately $1,500, to which EMED objected,transport, intellectual property, confidentiality and moved the New York court to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of at least $1.16 million. On November 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that KORU Medical’s fee motion be granted, and KORU Medical be awarded approximately $1.1 million in fees and expenses. EMED filed objections to that Report and Recommendation. EMED also appealed the New York court’s judgment of non-infringement to the CAFC, which the parties had fully briefed, and were awaiting a decision from the CAFC Court.indemnification.
NOTE 4 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
On June 29, 2016, the Board of Directors amended the Company’s 2015 Stock Option Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) authorizing the Company to grant awards to certain executives, key employees, and consultants under the Plan, which was approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on September 6, 2016. The total number of shares of Common Stock, with respect to which awards may be granted pursuant to the Plan, may not exceed 2019,2019.
On February 15, 2021, under the Plan, the Company issued to James M. Beck, its Interim Chief Executive Officer, a non-qualified option to purchase up to 4.37 per share, of which vested on February 15, 2021 and vested on March 22, 2021.
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $On March 15, 2021, under the 2019 Annual MeetingPlan, the Company issued to Linda Tharby, its incoming President and Chief Executive Officer, a non-qualified stock option to purchase up to shares of Shareholders.the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.875 per share, subject to vesting as follows:
On April 12, 2021, pursuant to an employment agreement entered into on March 15, 2021, with Linda Tharby, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, the Company issued three restricted stock awards for an aggregate 3,310,000 and each vesting subject to employment on the respective vesting date.
shares of common stock for an aggregate stock price of $As of June 30, 2020,2021, the Company had options to purchase 3,785,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding to certain executives, key employees and consultants under the Plan, of which 60,000 were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2020.2021.
Prior to January 1, 2021, each non-employee director of the Company was eligible to receive $50,000 annually (effective January 1, 2019), plus $10,000 for chairing a Board committee (effective February 20, 2019), all to be paid quarterly half in cash and half in common stock. The Chairman of the Board was eligible to receive an additional $50,000 annually (effective October 1, 2019), all to be paid in common stock.
Effective January 1, 2021, each non-employee director of the Company (other than the Chairman of the Board) and Board advisor are eligible to receive of $75,000 annually, The Chairman of the Board is eligible to receive $100,000 annually, Effective May 18, 2021, each non-employee director of the Company (other than the Chairman of the Board) and Board advisor are eligible to receive of $110,000 annually, The Chairman of the Board is eligible to receive $140,000 annually, . All payments were and are pro-rated for partial service.
- 11 -
On May 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with EMED as described aboveTechnologies Corporation (“EMED”) to settle all claims in NOTE 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.connection with all pending litigation matters between them. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement,
On February 16, 2021, Donald Pettigrew, the Company’s sole discretion, provided that the number offormer Chief Executive Officer, exercised options held by him for an aggregate shares of common stock and/or amountfor an aggregate exercise price of cash paid by the Company upon exercise will be capped at a value of $16.21 per share. The option was recorded at $347,008, the estimated fair value of the option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with a volatility rate of 52.68% and a risk-free rate of 0.17%$1,230,000.
On February 20, 2019,March 18, 2021, our shareholders approved the Board of Directors ofCompany’s 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Equity Plan”). There have been no awards made pursuant to the Company approved an increase in compensation for each non-employee director from $25,0002021 Equity Plan to $50,000 annually effective January 1, 2019, and an additional $10,000 annually for the chair of each Board committee effective February 20, 2019, in each case to be paid quarterly half in cash and half in common stock at the end of each fiscal quarter. On September 30, 2019, the Board of Directors of the Company named R. John Fletcher, a current KORU Medical director, as Chairman, replacing Executive Chairman, Daniel S. Goldberger, who remains a non-executive member of KORU Medical’s Board of Directors. In Mr. Fletcher’s role as Chairman, he receives an additional $50,000 in annual compensation, to be paid quarterly in shares of KORU Medical common stock based on the closing price of the stock on the last day of each quarter.date.
Pursuant to Daniel S. Goldberger’s employment agreement dated October 12, 2018, on February 1, 2019, when Donald B. Pettigrew was appointed to President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Goldberger was awarded a performance bonus in the amount of $270,000 to be paid half in cash and half in stock. The number of shares that were issued totaled 90,604 and was based upon the closing price of the Common Stock of the Company on February 1, 2019, as reported by the OTCQX. These shares were issued on April 3, 2019.
- 10 -
2015 STOCK OPTION PLAN, as amended
Time Based Stock Options
The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 20202021 and June 30, 20192020 was $6.68$ and $1.16,$ , respectively. The fair value of each award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in the six months ended June 30, 20202021 and June 30, 2019.2020. Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected lives of the options. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of the U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued. We have recognized tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation of $ and $ for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, | ||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Dividend yield |
| 0.00% |
|
| 0.00% |
| 0.00% | 0.00% | ||||||
Expected Volatility |
| 62.1% |
|
| 58.9-60.3% |
| %- % | % | ||||||
Weighted-average volatility |
| — |
|
| — |
| 0 | 0 | ||||||
Expected dividends |
| — |
|
| — |
| 0 | 0 | ||||||
Expected term (in years) |
| 10 Years |
|
| 10 Years |
| 10 | 10 | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
| 0.63% |
|
| 2.12-2.72% |
| %- % | % |
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1 |
| 3,647,000 |
| $ | 1.32 |
|
| 2,419,000 |
| $ | 1.00 |
| 2,922,494 | $ | 2.46 | 3,647,000 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||
Granted |
| 60,000 |
| $ | 9.76 |
|
| 1,300,000 |
| $ | 1.66 |
| 1,250,000 | $ | 3.94 | 60,000 | $ | 9.76 | ||||||
Exercised |
| 722,000 |
| $ | 0.58 |
|
| 65,000 |
| $ | 0.38 |
| 1,000,000 | $ | 1.23 | 722,000 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||
Forfeited |
| 200,000 |
| $ | 2.09 |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
| 100,000 | $ | 3.94 | 200,000 | $ | 2.09 | ||||||
Outstanding at June 30 |
| 2,785,000 |
| $ | 1.64 |
|
| 3,654,000 |
| $ | 1.24 |
| 3,072,494 | $ | 3.41 | 2,785,000 | $ | 1.64 | ||||||
Options exercisable at June 30 |
| 812,760 |
| $ | 1.37 |
|
| 804,260 |
| $ | 0.63 |
| 871,244 | $ | 2.18 | 812,760 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period |
|
|
| $ | 6.68 |
|
| — |
| $ | 1.16 |
| — | $ | 3.06 | — | $ | 6.68 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| — |
| $ | 290,991 |
|
| — |
| $ | 274,731 |
| — | $ | 1,528,522 | — | $ | 290,991 |
Total stock-based compensation expense totaled $290,991was $ and $274,731$ for the six months ended June 30, 20202021, and 2019,2020, respectively. Cash received from option exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020 was $ and 2019 was $95,880 and $24,700,$ , respectively.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020 and 2019 was $0.4$ million and $1.5$ million, respectively. The total intrinsic value ofThere were options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 20202021, and 2019 was $253,386 and $12,796, respectively. during the six months ended June 30, 2020.
- 12 -
Range of Exercise Price |
| Number |
| Weighted |
| Weighted |
| Number |
| Weighted |
| Number Outstanding | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number Exercisable | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
$0.50 – 9.76 |
| 2,785,000 |
| 7.6 years |
| $ | 1.64 |
| 812,760 |
| $ | 1.37 |
| |||||||||||||
$0.50-$9.76 | 3,072,494 | years | $ | 3.41 | 871,244 | $ | 2.18 |
- 11 -
As of June 30, 2020,2021, there was $2,011,224$ million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 48 months. The total fair value of shares vested as of June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2020, was $ and 2019, was $1,110,068 and $313,714,$ , respectively.
Performance Based Stock Options
The per share weighted average fair value ofThere were no stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 20202021, and 2019 was zero and $1.16, respectively. The fair value of each award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in the six months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019. Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the expected lives of the options. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of the U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued.2020.
|
| June 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
| — |
|
| 0.00% |
|
Expected Volatility |
|
| — |
|
| 58.9% |
|
Weighted-average volatility |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Expected dividends |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
Expected term (in years) |
|
| — |
|
| 10 Years |
|
Risk-free rate |
|
| — |
|
| 2.07% |
|
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1 |
| 1,000,000 |
| $ | 1.70 |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
| 1,000,000 | $ | 1.70 | 1,000,000 | $ | 1.70 | |||||
Granted |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| 1,000,000 |
| $ | 1.70 |
| 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Exercised |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
| 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Forfeited |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
| 1,000,000 | $ | 1.70 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Outstanding at June 30 |
| 1,000,000 |
| $ | 1.70 |
|
| 1,000,000 |
| $ | 1.70 |
| 0 | $ | — | 1,000,000 | $ | 1.70 | |||||
Options exercisable at June 30 |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| — |
| $ | — |
| 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | — | |||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
| — |
| $ | 1.16 |
| — | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| — |
| $ | 373,826 |
|
| — |
| $ | 41,909 |
| — | $ | (408,747 | ) | — | $ | 373,826 |
Total performance stock-based compensation expense totaled $373,826($ ) and $41,909$ for the six months ended June 30, 2021, and 2020, respectively. All performance-based stock options were forfeited as of June 30, 2021, and 2019, respectively.there was unrecognized compensation cost remaining.
Restricted Stock Awards
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted duringfollowing table summarizes the activities for our unvested restricted stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 20202021, and June 30, 2019, was zero and $1,162,561, respectively.2020.
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
Shares | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | ||||||||
Unvested at January 1 | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Granted | 1,000,000 | $ | 3.01 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Vested | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Forfeited/canceled | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | $ | 0 | |||||
Unvested at June 30 | 1,000,000 | $ | 3.01 | 0 | $ | — |
The following table presents information pertaining to performance based options outstanding at June 30, 2020:
Range of Exercise Price |
| Number |
| Weighted |
| Weighted |
| Number |
| Weighted |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.70 |
| 1,000,000 |
| 8.9 years |
| $ | 1.70 |
| — |
| $ | 1.70 |
|
- 1213 -
As of June 30, 2020,2021, there was $495,372$ of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share option based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That costunvested employee restricted shares. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 31 months. The total fair valueWe have recognized tax benefits associated with restricted stock award compensation of shares vested as of$ and for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and 2019 was zero for both periods.respectively.
NOTE 5 — DEBT OBLIGATIONS
On February 8, 2018, the Company issued a Promissory Note to KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) in the amount of $1.5 million as a variable rate revolving line of credit loan due on demand with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%, collateralized with a certificate of deposit in the amount of $1.5 million. On September 25, 2018, KeyBank released the certificate of deposit as collateral for the loan and the Company executed a Commercial Security Agreement as collateral for the loan.
On April 14, 2020, the Company issued a promissory note to the KeyBank National Association (the “Bank”) in the aggregate principal amount of $3.5$3.5 million (the “Note”) as an extension of its line of credit, replacing its then current line of credit agreement and promissory note with the Bank dated February 8, 2018 (the “Original Note”).agreement. The Company drew on the additional $2.0$3.5 million on April 23, 2020. The Original Note was in the form of a variable rate revolving line of credit with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%. The $3.5 million Note is in the form of a variable rate non-disclosable revolving line of credit with an interest rate of Prime Rate announced by the Bank minus 0.75%. The Note was renewed on June 24, 2021, in the same form with an interest rate of Prime Rate announced by the Bank minus 1.50%. Interest is due monthly, and all principal and unpaid interest is due on June 1, 2021.2022. The $3.5 million Note may be prepaid at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. The $3.5$3.5 million Note contains events of default and other provisions customary for a loan of this type.
In connection with the Note, the Company entered into a Commercial Security Agreement with the Bank dated April 14, 2020 (the “Security Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company granted a security interest in substantially all assets of the Company to secure the obligations of the Company under the Note. The Security Agreement contains terms and conditions typical for the granting of security interests of this kind.
The Company had $3.5 million and zerono amount outstanding against the line of credit as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.2021.
On April 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with the Bank (the “PPP Loan Agreement”) pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), providing for a loan in the principal amount of $1,476,508 (the “PPP Loan”). The PPP Loan was funded on April 27, 2020. On May 13, 2020, the Company returned the funds it received.
On April 27, 2020, the Company entered into a Progress Payment Loan and Security Agreement (“PPLSA”) and a Master Security Agreement (the “MSA”), each dated as of April 20, 2020, with Key Equipment Finance, a division of the Bank (“KEF”), to provide up to $2.5$2.5 million in financing for equipment purchases from third party vendors. The PPLSA allows the Company to make draws with KEF to make certain payments to the equipment suppliers prior to the commencement of periodic payments under a term loan. Each draw under the PPLSA will bear interest at a variable rate equal to the then-current Prime Rate and will be secured by the financed equipment under the MSA. At the end of each calendar quarter or year, the advances made under the PPLSA will be converted to term loans, subject to KEF’s approval of the equipment and certain other closing conditions being met. Once the draws under the PPLSA are converted into a term loan, each promissory note will bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.07% per annum, subject to adjustment based on KEF’s cost of funds, with principal and interest payable in 84 equal consecutive monthly installments. Each fixed rate installment promissory note may be prepaid, subject to a penalty if prepaid before the fifth anniversary of its issuance. As of June 30, 2020,2021, the Company had zerono amount outstanding against the PPLSA.
NOTE 6 — LEASES
We have finance and operating leases for our corporate office and certain office and computer equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms of 1 to 3 years,one year, some of which include options to extend the leases monthly and annually and some with options to terminate the leases within 1 year.
- 13 -
The components of lease expense were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
Operating lease cost | $ | 37,369 | $ | 37,921 | $ | 75,290 | $ | 75,843 | |||||
Short-term lease cost | 33,548 | 8,231 | 68,437 | 13,688 | |||||||||
Total lease cost | $ | 70,917 | $ | 46,152 | $ | 143,727 | $ | 89,531 | |||||
Finance lease cost: | |||||||||||||
Amortization of right-of-use assets | $ | 794 | $ | 1,855 | $ | 1,589 | $ | 3,711 | |||||
Interest on lease liabilities | 19 | 65 | 47 | 152 | |||||||||
Total finance lease cost | $ | 813 | $ | 1,920 | $ | 1,636 | $ | 3,863 |
|
| For the |
| For the |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease cost |
| $ | 37,921 |
| $ | 37,921 |
| $ | 75,843 |
| $ | 73,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of right-of-use assets |
| $ | 1,855 |
| $ | 1,061 |
| $ | 3,711 |
| $ | 2,121 |
|
Interest on lease liabilities |
|
| 65 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 152 |
|
| 131 |
|
Total finance lease cost |
| $ | 1,920 |
| $ | 1,120 |
| $ | 3,863 |
| $ | 2,252 |
|
- 14 -
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |||||||
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 70,363 | $ | 67,633 | |||
Financing cash flows from finance leases | 1,616 | 3,717 |
|
| For the |
| For the |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance cash flows from finance leases |
| $ | 1,869 |
| $ | 1,041 |
| $ | 3,717 |
| $ | 2,069 |
|
Finance lease cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of right-of-use assets |
| $ | 1,855 |
| $ | 1,061 |
| $ | 3,711 |
| $ | 2,121 |
|
Interest on lease liabilities |
|
| 65 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 152 |
|
| 131 |
|
Total finance lease cost |
| $ | 1,920 |
| $ | 1,120 |
| $ | 3,863 |
| $ | 2,252 |
|
Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:
|
| For the |
| ||||||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| ||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
| June 30, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Operating Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
| $ | 306,101 |
|
| $ | 439,782 |
| $ | 166,483 | $ | 236,846 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Operating lease current liabilities |
|
| 139,618 |
|
|
| 133,417 |
| 142,450 | 141,293 | |||||
Operating lease long term liabilities |
|
| 166,483 |
|
|
| 306,365 |
| 24,033 | 95,553 | |||||
Total operating lease liabilities |
| $ | 306,101 |
|
| $ | 439,782 |
| $ | 166,483 | $ | 236,846 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Finance Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Property and equipment, at cost |
| $ | 12,725 |
|
| $ | 6,363 |
| $ | 12,725 | $ | 12,725 | |||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
| (8,549 | ) |
|
| (2,121 | ) | (11,729 | ) | (10,139 | ) | |||
Property and equipment, net |
| $ | 4,176 |
|
| $ | 4,242 |
| $ | 996 | $ | 2,586 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Finance lease current liabilities |
|
| 3,195 |
|
|
| 4,295 |
| 1,030 | 2,646 | |||||
Finance lease long term liabilities |
|
| 1,030 |
|
|
| — |
| — | — | |||||
Total finance lease liabilities |
| $ | 4,225 |
|
| $ | 4,295 |
| $ | 1,030 | $ | 2,646 |
June 30, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term | |||||
Operating leases | 0.9 Years | 1.4 Years | |||
Finance leases | 0.4 Years | 0.7 Years | |||
Weighted Average Discount Rate | |||||
Operating leases | 4.75% | 4.75% | |||
Finance leases | 4.75% | 4.75% |
- 14 -
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
| 2 Years |
| 3 Years |
|
Finance leases |
| 1 Year |
| 1 Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
| 4.75% |
| 4.75% |
|
Finance leases |
| 4.75% |
| 4.75% |
|
Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
| Operating Leases |
| Finance Leases |
| ||
2020 |
|
| 75,843 |
|
| 1,664 |
|
2021 |
|
| 149,476 |
|
| 2,705 |
|
2022 |
|
| 97,256 |
|
| — |
|
Total lease payments |
|
| 322,575 |
|
| 4,369 |
|
Less imputed interest |
|
| (16,474 | ) |
| (144 | ) |
Total |
| $ | 306,101 |
| $ | 4,225 |
|
Year Ending December 31, | Operating Leases | Finance Leases | |||||
2021 (excluding the six months ended June 30, 2021) | 74,185 | 1,042 | |||||
2022 | 97,257 | 0 | |||||
2023 | 0 | 0 | |||||
2024 | 0 | 0 | |||||
2025 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Thereafter | 0 | 0 | |||||
Total undiscounted lease payments | 171,442 | 1,042 | |||||
Less: imputed interest | (4,959 | ) | (12 | ) | |||
Total lease liabilities | $ | 166,483 | $ | 1,030 |
- 15 -
NOTE 7 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS— EQUITY
BUILDING LEASEOn June 18, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Piper Sandler & Co. and Canaccord Genuity LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein (the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sel shares of its common stock. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable for a period of days, to purchase up to an additional shares of the Company’s common stock, which the Underwriters exercised in full on . The Underwriters purchased the shares pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, including the shares subject to the option, at a price of $ per share. Proceeds to the Company, net of discounts, commissions, fees and expenses, were $26.6 million.
Mark Pastreich,On November 16, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a former directorstock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to $10.0 million of its outstanding common stock through April 2019, isDecember 31, 2021. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had purchased shares for an aggregate $3,499,358 pursuant to this program.
NOTE 8 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 12, 2021, the lead plaintiff filed a principalnotice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the claims in the entity that ownspreviously disclosed putative class action lawsuit filed in the building leased by usUnited States District Court for our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility at 24 Carpenter Road, Chester,the Southern District of New York 10918. On February 28, 2019, we completed year twenty of a twenty-year lease with monthly lease payments of $11,042. On November 14, 2017, we executed a lease extension, which calls for six-month extensions beginning March 1, 2019 withagainst the optionCompany and its Chief Financial Officer and former Chief Executive Officer, alleging they made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to renew six times at a monthly lease amount of $12,088. The Company exercised four ofdisclose material adverse facts about the six additional renewal options for September 1, 2019, throughCompany’s business, operations and prospects, in the Company’s earnings communications and Form 10-Q filed during the period August 31, 2021.
The lease payments were $36,264 for both three months ended June 30,4, 2020 and 2019 and $72,528 and $70,436 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company also paid property taxes in the amount of $13,238 and $12,989 for three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively and $26,659 and $25,416 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.January 25, 2021.
PART I –— ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking” statements (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs of the management, as well as assumptions made and information currently available.
Our actual results may vary materially from the forward-looking statements made in this report due to important factors such as uncertainties associated with COVID-19, customer ordering patterns, availability and costs of raw materials and labor and our ability to recover such costs, our ability to convert inventory to a source of cash, future operating results, growth of new patient starts, Food and Drug Administration and foreign authority regulations and the outcome of regulatory audits, introduction of competitive products, acceptance of and demand for new and existing products, ability to penetrate new markets, success in enforcing and obtaining patents, reimbursement related risks, government regulation of the home health care industry, success of theour research and development effort, expanding the market of FREEDOM60® demand in the SCIg market, availability of sufficient capital if or when needed, dependence on key personnel, and the impact of recent accounting pronouncements. When used in this report, the words “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect current views with respect to future events based on currently available information and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Throughout this report, the “Company,” “KORU Medical,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” andor “our” referrefers to Repro Med Systems, Inc.
- 15 -
OVERVIEW
The Company designs, manufactures and markets proprietary portable and innovative medical devices primarily for the ambulatory infusion market as governed by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) quality and regulatory system and international standards for quality system management.
KORU Medical continues to monitor its operations and government recommendations and has made modificationsas they relate to its normal operations because of the COVID-19 outbreak, including requiring most of its non-production related team memberspandemic. We cannot predict the effects the pandemic may have on our business, in particular with respect to work remotelydemand for our products, our strategy, and our prospects, the effects on our customers, or the impact on a staggered work shift. The Company has continued to maintain a manufacturing operational capacity at its manufacturing facility located in Chester, New York, and has instituted heightened cleaning and sanitization standards and several health and safety protocols and procedures to safeguard its team members who doour financial results. For example, our future net sales growth may continue to report in person.
On April 14, 2020,be impacted due to fewer new prescriptions for individuals with Primary Immune Deficiency Disease (“PIDD”) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) as a result of patients not seeking care during the Company issued a promissory note to the KeyBank National Association (the “Bank”) in the aggregate principal amount of $3.5 million as an extension of its line of credit, replacing its current line of credit agreement and promissory note with the Bank dated February 8, 2018 (the “Original Note”). In response to concerns about the potential impact of COVID-19, the Company elected to draw the additional $2.0 million available under the line of credit, drawing the full amount available of $3.5 million on its line of credit.
On April 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with the Bank (the “PPP Loan Agreement”) pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), providing for a loan in the principal amount of $1.5 million (the “PPP Loan”). The PPP Loan was funded on April 27, 2020. On May 13, 2020, the Company returned the funds it received.
On May 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”) to settle all claims in connection with all pending litigation matters between them (the “Claims”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued to EMED (i) 95,238 restricted stock units, which vested on May 21, 2020 and 95,238 restricted stock units vesting on January 1, 2021, and (ii) an option to purchase up to 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $11.21 per share prior to February 1, 2021, which can be settled in cash in lieu of common stock at the Company’s sole discretion, providedpandemic. We believe that the numberpandemic has precipitated limited availability and rising costs of shares of common stock and/or amount of cash paid by the Company upon exercise will be capped at a value of $16.21 per share. The Settlement Agreement includes mutual releasesraw materials and covenants not to sue for any claim arising before May 20, 2020 and the Company covenants not to challenge any EMED patents that were the subject of the Claims unless EMED asserts them in the future against Company products. The aggregate non-cash litigation settlement expense recognized during the period ended June 30, 2020 was $2.2 million.
On June 18, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Piper Sandler & Co. and Canaccord Genuity LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein (the “Underwriters”), pursuant tolabor, which the Company agreed to issue and sell 3,125,000 shares of its common stock. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable for a period of 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 468,750 shares of the Company’s common stock, which the Underwriters exercised in full on June 19, 2020. The Underwriters purchased the shares pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, including the shares subject to the option, at a price of $7.52 per share with proceeds to the Company net of discounts, commissions, fees and expenses of $26.5 million.
We ended the second quarter of 2020 with net sales of $7.7 million, an increase of 44% compared with the same period last year, driven primarily by higher sales volume in needle sets, tubing and pump sales, due to what we believe was continued demand increases which included clinical trials, as well as increased purchasing to support themay impact our financial results if current trends towards at-home infusion therapy and in response to the uncertainties created by COVID-19.
Our gross margin percentage, which is gross profit stated as a percentage of net sales, was 63.7% down from 65.0% in the prior year mostly due to overtime costs related to COVID-19 absenteeism. Gross margin was 65.4% when adjusted for overtime.
Net loss was $1.1 million for the quarter, compared with net income of $0.1 million for the previous year, driven by the $2.2 million stock based litigation settlement expense, partially offset by higher net sales compared with last year. continue.
As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $38.1 million cash on hand, including $26.5 million resulting from the capital raise during the quarter described above, and a draw of $3.5 million on the line of credit.
- 16 -
Our revenues derive from three business sources: (i) domestic core, (ii) international core, and (iii) novel therapies. Our core revenues consist of sales of our products for the delivery of SCIg to treat PIDD, CIDP, and other disease states that are FDA cleared for use with the KORU syringe driver. Novel therapies consist of revenues from clinical trials, which consist of sales of syringe drivers, tubing and needles, as well as non-recurring engineering services.
Total net sales were $5.5 million, or 28% lower for the three months ended June 30, 2021, as compared to the prior year period, where we saw stocking orders of approximately $1.1 million that we believe were due to the uncertainty of the pandemic, as well as higher novel therapies sales of $1.2 million from non-recurring clinical trials. Sequential quarter net sales from the three months ended March 31, 2021, grew 2%, driven by domestic core growth of 4%. Both the overall domestic market and our end-user sales to the specialty pharmacy channel grew mid-single digits through the second quarter of 2021, we believe indicating market recovery in new patient starts for SCIg therapy.
Our inventory position increased $0.7 million from December 31, 2020, as we transition manufacturing to our secondary source.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months ended June 30, 20202021, compared to June 30, 20192020
Net Sales
The following table summarizes our net sales for the three months ended June 30, 20202021, and 2019:2020:
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| % of Sales |
| |||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| % |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| |||
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
| $ | 6,745,810 |
| $ | 4,569,226 |
| $ | 2,176,584 |
| 47.6% |
| 87.5% |
| 85.4% |
|
International |
|
| 963,094 |
|
| 779,586 |
|
| 183,508 |
| 23.5% |
| 12.5% |
| 14.6% |
|
Total |
| $ | 7,708,904 |
| $ | 5,348,812 |
| $ | 2,360,092 |
| 44.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | % of Net Sales | ||||||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | $ | % | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Core | $ | 4,597,797 | $ | 5,557,577 | $ | (959,780 | ) | (17.3% | ) | 83.2% | 72.1% | |||||
Novel Therapies | 47,973 | 1,188,233 | (1,140,260 | ) | (96.0% | ) | 0.9% | 15.4% | ||||||||
Total Domestic | 4,645,770 | 6,745,810 | (2,100,040 | ) | (31.1% | ) | 84.1% | 87.5% | ||||||||
International Core | 859,694 | 853,043 | 6,651 | 0.8% | 15.5% | 11.1% | ||||||||||
Novel Therapies | 22,710 | 110,051 | (87,341 | ) | (79.4% | ) | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||||||||
Total International | 882,404 | 963,094 | (80,690 | ) | (8.4% | ) | 15.9% | 12.5% | ||||||||
Total | $ | 5,528,174 | $ | 7,708,904 | $ | (2,180,730 | ) | (28.3% | ) |
Total net sales increased $2.4decreased $2.2 million, or 44.1%28.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 20202021, as compared with the same period last year, driven primarily by higherlower novel therapies sales volume in needle sets, tubing and pump sales, mostlyof $1.2 million compared with last year due to whata non-recurring clinical trial last year, and lower domestic core sales to our largest distributor, where we believe was continued demand increases which included clinical trials, as well as increased purchasing to supportpandemic related stocking occurred last year. International core net sales were $0.9 million, up 1% compared with the trends towards at-home infusion therapy and in response to the uncertainties created by COVID-19.same period last year.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 20202021 and 20192020 is as follows:
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| % |
| 2021 | 2020 | $ | % | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
| $ | 4,909,880 |
| $ | 3,475,664 |
| $ | 1,434,216 |
| 41.3% |
| $ | 3,210,184 | $ | 4,909,880 | $ | (1,699,696 | ) | (34.6% | ) | ||||
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales |
|
| 63.7% |
|
| 65.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
| 58.1% | 63.7% |
Gross profit increased $1.4decreased $1.7 million or 41.3%34.6% in the three months ended June 30, 2020,2021, compared to the same period in 2019.2020. This increasedecrease in the quarter was mostly driven by the increasedecrease in net sales of $2.4 million. Gross margin declined compared with last year mostly due to overtime costs related to COVID-19 absenteeism.$2.2 million as described above. Gross margin was 65.4% when adjusted for overtime.negatively impacted by lower volumes, resulting in unfavorable absorption in the quarter.
- 17 -
Selling, general and administrative, Litigation and Research and development
Our selling, general and administrative, expenses, litigation and research and development costs for the three months ended June 30, 20202021 and 20192020 are as follows:
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | |||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| % |
| 2021 | 2020 | $ | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| $ | 3,201,831 |
| $ | 2,050,435 |
| $ | 1,151,396 |
| 56.2% |
| $ | 4,085,945 | $ | 3,201,831 | $ | 884,114 | 27.6% | |||||
Litigation |
|
| 2,346,914 |
|
| 1,124,947 |
|
| 1,221,967 |
| 108.6% |
| — | 2,346,914 | (2,346,914 | ) | (100.0% | ) | ||||||
Research and development |
|
| 298,196 |
|
| 178,235 |
|
| 119,961 |
| 67.3% |
| 386,878 | 298,196 | 88,682 | 29.7% | ||||||||
|
| $ | 5,846,941 |
| $ | 3,353,617 |
| $ | 2,493,324 |
| 74.3% |
| $ | 4,472,823 | $ | 5,846,941 | $ | (1,374,118 | ) | (23.5% | ) | |||
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales |
|
| 75.9% |
|
| 62.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
| 80.9% | 75.9% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.2$0.9 million, or 56.2%27.6%, during the three months ended June 30, 20202021 compared to the same period last year, mostly due to higher salary$0.5 million in market research, testing and related benefits of $0.9 million dueconsulting fees all to new hires in second half of last year, severance and a bonus for employee service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adding to the increase were consulting and recruiting fees of $0.2 million related to marketing,support commercialization, regulatory and strategic initiatives, $0.2 million in costs associated with the departure and several new hires in regulatory and sales. Also contributing toreplacement of the increase wereformer chief executive officer, as well as higher distribution related fees incurred with our largest distributor, higherboard of director fees and insurance premiums related to our directors and officers liability insurance policy, in aggregate totalingof $0.2 million. Offsetting these increases were lower trade show and travel expenses of $0.1 million due to COVID-19 related travel restrictions.
Litigation fees increased $1.2 millionwere zero for the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same period last year primarily due toas a result of the negotiation of and entry into a litigation settlement agreementreached with EMED in May 2020 resulting in a non-cash expense of $2.2 million.our competitor last year.
- 17 -
Research and development expenses increased $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 20202021 compared with the same period last year mostly due to increased salary and related benefits duehigher consulting fees to higher headcount as we continue to increase oursupport product development initiatives.for novel therapies.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by 10.2%24.7 % to $118,415 in the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared with $94,940 in the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with $86,169 in the three months ended June 30, 2019.2020. We continue to invest in capital assets, mostly related to manufacturing and computer equipment, and in patent applications and their maintenance.equipment.
Net (Loss)/Income
Three Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| 2021 | 2020 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| |||||||||||||||
Net (Loss)/Income |
| $ | (1,076,038 | ) | $ | 78,183 |
| $ | (1,154,221 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Loss | $ | (1,124,549 | ) | $ | (1,076,038 | ) | $ | (48,511 | ) | (4.5% | ) | |||||||||||
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales |
| (14.0% | ) |
| 1.5% |
|
|
|
| (20.3% | ) | (14.0% | ) |
Our net loss forincreased $48,511 in the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $1.1 million,2021 compared to net income of $0.1 million forwith the three months ended June 30, 2019,same period last year mostly driven by the litigation settlement expenselower gross profit and higher selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by higher sales,lower litigation costs all as described above.
Six months ended June 30, 20202021 compared to June 30, 20192020
Net Sales
The following table summarizes our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 20202021 and 2019:2020:
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| % of Sales |
| |||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| % |
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| |||
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
| $ | 12,086,676 |
| $ | 8,452,791 |
| $ | 3,633,885 |
| 43.0% |
| 86.1% |
| 81.9% |
|
International |
|
| 1,952,237 |
|
| 1,870,299 |
|
| 81,938 |
| 4.4% |
| 13.9% |
| 18.1% |
|
Total |
| $ | 14,038,913 |
| $ | 10,323,090 |
| $ | 3,715,823 |
| 36.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | % of Net Sales | ||||||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | $ | % | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Core | $ | 9,010,214 | $ | 10,430,343 | $ | (1,420,129 | ) | (13.6% | ) | 82.2% | 74.3% | |||||
Novel Therapies | 82,345 | 1,656,333 | (1,573,988 | ) | (95.0% | ) | 0.8% | 11.8% | ||||||||
Total Domestic | 9,092,559 | 12,086,676 | (2,994,117 | ) | (24.8% | ) | 83.0% | 86.1% | ||||||||
International Core | 1,838,600 | 1,837,910 | 690 | 0.0% | 16.8% | 13.1% | ||||||||||
Novel Therapies | 27,966 | 114,327 | (86,361 | ) | (75.5% | ) | 0.2% | 0.8% | ||||||||
Total International | 1,866,566 | 1,952,237 | (85,671 | ) | (4.4% | ) | 17.0% | 13.9% | ||||||||
Total | $ | 10,959,125 | $ | 14,038,913 | $ | (3,079,788 | ) | (21.9% | ) |
- 18 -
Total net sales increased $3.7decreased $3.1 million or 36.0%21.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The volume increase was2021, as compared to the prior year period, driven primarily by lower novel therapies sales of $1.7 million compared with last year due to a non-recurring clinical trial last year and lower domestic core net sales driven by what we believe was continued growth in diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency diseases (“PIDD”) and expansion intoto be pandemic related stocking last year at our largest distributor. International core net sales were $1.8 million tracking even with the neurology market with expanded Hizentra® indication for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) and clinical trials, as well as increased purchasing to support the trend towards at-home infusion therapy and in response to the uncertainties created by COVID-19.same period last year.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 20202021 and 20192020 is as follows:
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | |||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| % |
| 2021 | 2020 | $ | % | |||||||||||
Gross Profit |
| $ | 8,698,090 |
| $ | 6,523,618 |
| $ | 2,174,472 |
| 33.3% |
| $ | 6,442,038 | $ | 8,698,090 | $ | (2,256,052 | ) | (25.9% | ) | |||
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales |
|
| 62.0% |
|
| 63.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
| 58.8% | 62.0% |
Gross profit increased $2.2decreased $2.3 million or 33.3%%25.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2020,2021, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin declined compared with last year mostlydecreased primarily due to overtime costs relatedunder absorption due to COVID-19 absenteeism in the second quarter, as well as the expense for an obsolescence reserve resulting from a discontinued product line. Excluding these items gross margin would have been 63.4%.lower volume.
- 18 -
Selling, general and administrative, Litigation and Research and development
Our selling, general and administrative expenses, litigation and research and development costs for the six months ended June 30, 20202021 and 20192020 are as follows:
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Change from Prior Year |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | |||||||||||||||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| $ |
| % |
| 2021 | 2020 | $ | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| $ | 5,964,811 |
| $ | 4,535,303 |
| $ | 1,429,508 |
| 31.5% |
| $ | 9,078,774 | $ | 5,964,811 | $ | 3,113,963 | 52.2% | |||||
Litigation |
|
| 2,446,072 |
|
| 1,617,462 |
|
| 828,610 |
| 51.2% |
| — | 2,446,072 | (2,446,072 | ) | (100.0% | ) | ||||||
Research and development |
|
| 554,221 |
|
| 280,194 |
|
| 274,027 |
| 97.8% |
| 723,719 | 554,221 | 169,498 | 30.6% | ||||||||
|
| $ | 8,965,104 |
| $ | 6,432,959 |
| $ | 2,532,145 |
| 39.4% |
| $ | 9,802,493 | $ | 8,965,104 | $ | 837,389 | 9.3% | |||||
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales |
|
| 63.9% |
|
| 62.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
| 89.4% | 63.9% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.4$3.1 million, or 31.5%52.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 20202021 compared to the same period last year, mostly due to $1.6 million in costs associated with the departure and replacement of the former chief executive officer and the recruitment of two new Board members, which includes non-cash equity expense of $0.4 million. Further contributing to the increase was the rollout impact of higher salary and related benefits and recruiting fees in aggregate $1.0of $0.9 million resulting from new hires after June 30, 2019. Also contributingin the second half of last year to the increase were consulting fees of $0.3 million related to marketing, regulatorysupport commercialization, business development and strategicmedical affairs for our novel therapies initiatives, as well as higher distribution relatedinfrastructure. Market research, testing and consulting fees incurred with our largest distributor,to support commercialization and regulatory filings also contributed $0.6 million, as well as higher director fees and director and officer liability insurance premiums related to our directorsof $0.4 million. Offsetting these expenses were lower professional fees, the Covid-related heroes bonus paid last year and officers insurance policyother miscellaneous expenses in aggregate totaling $0.3$0.4 million. OffsettingLitigation expense was lower by $2.4 million as a result of the increases were lower trade show and travel expenses of $0.2 million due to the impact of COVID-19 related travel restrictions.
Litigation fees increased $0.8 million compared to the same period last year due primarily to the negotiation of and entry into a litigation settlement agreement reached with EMED in May 2020 resulting in a non-cash expense of $2.2 million.entered into last year.
Research and development expenses increased $0.3$0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 20202021 compared with the same period last year mostly due to increased salary and related benefits dueincreases to higher headcount as we continue to increase oursupport product development initiatives.for novel therapies.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by 7.3%28.4% to $233,888 in the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared with $182,164 in the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with $169,820 in the six months ended June 30, 2019.2020. We continuedcontinue to invest in capital assets, mostly related to manufacturing and computer equipment, and in patent applications and their maintenance.equipment.
Net (Loss)/Income
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
| Change from Prior Year |
| |||||
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
|
| $ |
| |||
Net Loss |
| $ | (626,610 | ) | $ | (7,207 | ) |
| $ | (619,403 | ) |
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales |
|
| (4.5% | ) |
| (0.1% | ) |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | Change from Prior Year | |||||||||||
2021 | 2020 | $ | % | |||||||||
Net Loss | $ | (2,400,687 | ) | $ | (626,610 | ) | $ | (1,774,077 | ) | (283.1% | ) | |
Stated as a Percentage of Net Sales | (21.9% | ) | (4.5% | ) |
- 19 -
Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 20202021 was $0.6$2.4 million compared to a net loss of $7,207$0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019,2020, driven by the EMED settlement charge,lower gross profit and higher selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by higher saleslitigation expenses incurred last year, all as described above. Offsetting the loss was a tax benefit of $0.5 million resulting from book to tax differences related to stock option expense.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal source of liquidity is our cash on hand of $38.1$26.5 million as of June 30, 2020, which includes the net proceeds from the recent capital raise described below totaling $26.5 million and a $3.5 million draw against our line of credit. In response to concerns about the potential impact of COVID-19, the Company elected to draw $3.5 million, the full amount available on its line of credit.2021. Our principal source of operating cash inflows is from sales of our products to customers. Our principal cash outflows relate to the purchase and production of inventory and related costs, and selling, general and administrative expenses.
On June 18, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Piper Sandler & Co. and Canaccord Genuity LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein (the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 3,125,000 shares of its common stock. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable for a period of 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 468,750 shares of the Company’s common stock, which the Underwriters exercised in full on June 19, 2020. The Underwriters purchased the shares pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, including the shares subject to the option, at a price of $7.52 per share with proceeds to the Company net of discounts, commissions, fees and expenses of $26.5 million.
- 19 -
On May 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”) to settle all claims in connection with all pending litigation matters between them (the “Claims”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued to EMED (i) 95,238 restricted stock units, which vested on May 21, 2020 and 95,238 restricted stock units vesting on January 1, 2021, and (ii) an option to purchase up to 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $11.21 per share prior to February 1, 2021, which can be settled in cash in lieu of common stock at the Company’s sole discretion, provided that the number of shares of common stock and/or amount of cash paid by the Company upon exercise will be capped at a value of $16.21 per share. The Settlement Agreement includes mutual releases and covenants not to sue for any claim arising before May 20, 2020 and the Company covenants not to challenge any EMED patents that were the subject of the Claims unless EMED asserts them in the future against Company products. This was a non-cash settlement from which we recognized expense in the amount of $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2020.
The Company’s operations continue to remain active, as we currently qualify as an “essential business” under New York state government guidelines. With the COVID-19 outbreak, the need to ensure vulnerable patients have access to home-based treatments is more apparent than ever. Home infusion therapy keeps high-risk patients with immune diseases and other conditions out of institutional settings and allows them to receive treatment at home.
We believe that as of June 30, 2020, cash on hand and cash expected to be generated from future operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations, including further research and development and capital expenditures, for the next 12 months, as well as accelerate execution of our strategic initiatives. We believe KORU Medical’s home infusion products continue to find a solid following in the subcutaneous immunoglobulin (“SCIg”) market, as well as, into new markets like neurology where Hizentra® received an expanded indication for CIDP.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows:
|
| Six Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
| $ | 2,707,549 |
| $ | (1,483,909 | ) |
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities |
| $ | (513,273 | ) | $ | 1,532,487 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| $ | 30,064,144 |
| $ | 19,811 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 | ||||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities | $ | (2,776,150 | ) | $ | 2,707,549 | ||
Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (167,136 | ) | $ | (513,273 | ) | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | 2,166,478 | $ | 30,064,144 |
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities of $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was primarily due to the net loss of $2.4 million, working capital changes which included an increase in inventory of $0.7 million related to the transition of manufacturing to our secondary source, and a decrease in accrued expenses of $0.8 million most of which was non-cash activity related to the issuance of common stock in settlement of litigation, offset by an increase in accounts payable of $0.4 million and a decrease in prepaids of $0.3 million related to insurance payments. Further contributing were deferred tax assets of $1.2 million increased for book to tax differences related to stock option expense. Offsetting these were primarily non-cash charges for stock-based compensation of $1.3 million, and depreciation and amortization of $0.2 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, was mostly attributable to non-cash charges for stock-based compensation and litigation settlement expense of $2.1 million, an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued payroll of $2.1 million, driven by the litigation settlement with EMED, the capital raise and customer rebates. Further adding to the increasecash provided by operating activities was an increase in tax liability of $0.3 million, resulting from book tax differences related to option expense. Collection against accounts receivable also contributed $0.3 million. Offsetting these were an increase in inventory of $1.3 million as we built inventory to keep pace with sales growth and to insure timely order fulfillment.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in operatinginvesting activities of $1.5$0.2 million for the six months endedending June 30, 20192021, was mostly attributable to increased accounts receivable of $1.9 million as one of our major customer’s payment terms changed on January 1, 2019 from net 30 to net 60 days,for capital expenditures for manufacturing and increased inventory of $0.5 million as we look to build stock to keep pace with sales growth. Partially offsetting these were our non-cash charges for stock based compensation of $0.5 million and depreciation and amortization of long lived tangible and intangible asset of $0.2 million.office equipment.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $0.5 million for the six months ending June 30, 2020, was for capital expenditures for research and development and strategic initiatives as well as for patent and trademark applications. Net cash of $1.5
Financing Activities
The $2.2 million provided by investingfinancing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was mostly the result of the maturation of a certificate of deposit for $1.5 million2021, is from options exercised and the salenon-cash activity related to the issuance of the house the Company owned for $0.2 million, offset by capital expenditures and patent application and maintenancecommon stock in settlement of $0.2 million.litigation.
- 20 -
Financing Activities
The $30.1 million provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2020, is from the $26.5 million capital raise, net of expenses, a $3.5 million draw on the line of credit and $0.1 million from options exercised. The $19,811 provided by financing activities for
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS RECENTLY ADOPTED
Refer to “NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the six months ended June 30, 2019 is a result of options exercised less payments for cancelled shares and leased office equipment.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13—Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326); Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. For assets held at amortized cost basis, Topic 326 eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net amount expected to be collected. For available for sale debt securities, credit losses should be measured in a manner similar to current GAAP, however Topic 326 will require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. This ASU affects entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of the ASU on itsaccompanying financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.which is incorporated herein by reference.
In December 2019,- 20 -
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET ADOPTED
Refer to “NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES” in the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12 Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing several exceptions including the exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of the ASU on itsaccompanying financial statements, disclosure requirements and methods of adoption.which is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all recently issued accounting pronouncements. Recent accounting pronouncements not specifically identified in our disclosures are either not applicable to the Company or are not expected to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Management of the Company believes that investors’ understanding of the Company’s performance is enhanced by disclosing non-GAAP financial measures as a reasonable basis for comparison of the Company’s ongoing results of operations. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for GAAP-basis measures and results. Our non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures of other companies. The table below provides a disclosure of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most closely analogous measure determined in accordance with GAAP.
Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. They are limited in value because they exclude charges that have a material effect on our reported results and, therefore, should not be relied upon as the sole financial measures to evaluate our financial results. The non-GAAP financial measures are meant to supplement, and to be viewed in conjunction with, GAAP financial results.
- 21 -
We disclose and discuss Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP financial measure in our public releases, including quarterly earnings releases, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings (net income) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, reorganization charges, and litigation, manufacturing initiative and stock option expenses. Prior to January 1, 2020, discontinued product expense and manufacturing initiative expense was not included in our definition of Adjusted EBITDA. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is used by investors and other users of our financial statements as a supplemental financial measure that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliation, we believe provides additional information that is useful to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business. We also believe the disclosure of Adjusted EBITDA helps investors meaningfully evaluate and compare our cash flow generating capacity from quarter to quarter and year to year. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management as a supplemental internal measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations. Because management uses Adjusted EBITDA for such purposes, the Company uses Adjusted EBITDA as a significant criterion for determining the amount of annual cash incentive compensation paid to our executive officers and employees. We have historically found that Adjusted EBITDA is superior to other metrics for our company-wide cash incentive program, as it is more easily explained and understood by our typical employee.
A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures is below:
|
| Three Months Ended |
|
| Six Months Ended | ||||||||||
Reconciliation of GAAP Net (Loss)/Income |
| June 30, |
|
| June 30, | ||||||||||
to Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA: |
| 2020 |
|
| 2019 |
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 | |||||
GAAP Net (Loss)/Income |
| $ | (1,076,038 | ) |
| $ | 78,183 |
|
| $ | (626,610 | ) | $ | (7,207 | ) |
Tax Expense |
|
| 30,919 |
|
|
| 24,683 |
|
|
| 172,847 |
|
| 2,584 |
|
Depreciation/Amortization |
|
| 94,940 |
|
|
| 86,169 |
|
|
| 182,164 |
|
| 169,820 |
|
Interest Expense/(Income), Net |
|
| 5,002 |
|
|
| (18,243 | ) |
|
| (14,028 | ) |
| (35,723 | ) |
Reorganization Charges |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 354,926 |
|
Discontinued Product Expenses |
|
| (31,581 | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| 77,977 |
|
| — |
|
Litigation Expenses |
|
| 2,346,914 |
|
|
| 1,124,947 |
|
|
| 2,446,072 |
|
| 1,617,462 |
|
Manufacturing Initiative Expenses |
|
| 25,957 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 135,759 |
|
| — |
|
Stock Option Expense |
|
| 363,851 |
|
|
| 194,765 |
|
|
| 664,817 |
|
| 316,640 |
|
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 1,759,964 |
|
| $ | 1,490,504 |
|
| $ | 3,038,998 |
| $ | 2,418,502 |
|
Discontinued Product Expense. We have excluded the effect of expenses related to a discontinued product line in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure. We expected to sunset our Res-Q-Vac product line in 2020, but due to the failure of equipment used to manufacture the product, the discontinuation and resulting expense was accelerated into the first quarter of 2020 which we would not otherwise incur in periods presented as part of our continuing operations. Subsequently, in the second quarter of 2020 we sold off a portion of the discontinued inventory previously reserved. We do not expect to incur any related expenses in the future.
Reorganization Charges. We have excluded the effect of Reorganization Charges in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure. We incurred significant expenses in connection with the termination and replacement of C-suite executives and senior management which we would not otherwise incur in periods presented as part of our continuing operations. Reorganization charges include costs related to the replacement of C-suite executives including a transition bonus and recruiting fees, prior to March 31, 2019.
Litigation Expenses. We have excluded litigation expenses in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure. Litigation expenses include stock based litigation settlement expense of $2.2 million related to the settlement agreement entered into with EMED on May 20, 2020. We continue to evaluate our business performance excluding litigation fees, however, we expect these expenses related to the EMED litigation to discontinue as a result of the settlement.
Manufacturing Initiative Expenses. We have excluded the effect of expenses related to the implementation of those portions of our strategic plan related to creating manufacturing efficiencies, in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure. We incurred expenses in connection with executing on these initiatives which we would not otherwise incur in periods presented as part of our continuing operations. We expect to incur related expenses for the next twelve to eighteen months as we continue to execute on our strategic plan.
Stock Option Expense. We have excluded the effect of stock option expenses in calculating our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA measure. Although stock option compensation is a key incentive offered to our employees, we continue to evaluate our business performance excluding stock option compensation expenses. We record non-cash compensation expense related to grants of options and depending upon the size, timing and the terms of the grants, the non-cash compensation expense may vary significantly but will recur in future periods.
- 22 -
PART I – ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Applicable.applicable.
PART I – ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management, including the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as such is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluations, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarterthree months ended June 30, 2020,2021, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From 2013 until May 2020, we wereThe Company has been and may again become involved in several lawsuits with our principal competitor, EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”). EMED allegedlegal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. KORU Medical is not presently a party to any litigation or other legal proceeding that our needle sets infringed various patents controlled by EMED. Certainis believed to be material to its financial condition.
On July 12, 2021, the lead plaintiff filed a notice of these lawsuits also alleged antitrust violations, unfair business practices, and various other business tort claims. On May 26, 2020, the parties announced the settlement of allvoluntary dismissal without prejudice of the litigation between KORU Medical and EMED. The settlement agreement provides KORU Medical with freedom to operate under EMED’s existing patent portfolio, dismissal of all litigation with prejudice (including the claims against Andrew Sealfon, our former President and Chief Executive Officer), and an equity payment by KORU Medical to EMED. The settled litigation is described below.
The initial case involving EMED was filed by us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on September 20, 2013 (the “California case”),previously disclosed putative class action lawsuit filed in response to a letter from EMED claiming patent infringement by us, and sought a declaratory judgment establishing the invalidity of the patent referenced in the letter – EMED’s US patent 8,500,703 – “’703.” EMED answered the complaint and asserted patent infringement of the ’703 patent and several counterclaims relating generally to claims of unfair business practices against us. We responded by adding several claims against EMED, generally relating to claims of unfair business practices on EMED’s part. On June 16, 2015, the California court entered a preliminary injunction against KORU Medical for making certain statements regarding products cleared for use by the FDA, or that could be safely used, with KORU Medical’s Freedom60 pump, without voiding the product warranty. On September 11, 2015, we requested an ex parte reexamination of the ’703 patent by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). The ex parte reexamination resulted in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO determining that claims 1-10 of the ’703 patent are invalid, leaving claim 11 as the only surviving claim of the ’703 patent. Claim 11 of the ’703 patent, however, was not asserted in the California case. EMED informed KORU Medical it will neither appeal the PTAB’s decision nor pursue a claim based on infringement of claim 11 of the ’703 patent in the California case.
The second court case was filed by EMED in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the “Texas Court”) on June 25, 2015, claiming patent infringement on another of its patents (US 8,961,476 – “’476”), by our needle sets, and seeking unspecified monetary damages (“ED Texas ’476 matter”). This ’476 patent is related to the invalid claims of the EMED ’703 patent.
On September 17, 2015, we requested an inter partes review (“IPR”) of the ’476 patent, and subsequently after a trial the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision in our favor, invalidating all claims but one (“dependent Claim 9”) of the ’476 patent. EMED appealed the PTAB’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “CAFC”), which affirmed the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in our favor on April 3, 2018.
During the IPR proceedings regarding the ’476 patent, EMED filed a new patent application that subsequently issued as US 9,808,576 – “’576” on November 7, 2017. On this same date, EMED filed a new case (the “third case”) in the Texas Court claiming patent infringement of the ’576 patent by our needle sets, and seeking unspecified damages and a preliminary injunction against marketing and sales of our needle sets. We moved to dismiss or transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), which resulted inagainst the transfer of the third case to SDNY (“SDNY ’576 matter”) on May 30, 2018.
- 23 -
On April 23, 2018, EMED filed a new civil case (the “fourth case”) against us in the Texas Court asserting antitrust, defamationCompany and unfair business practice claims,its Chief Financial Officer and seeking unspecified damages, similar to those previously presented in the California case, described above. The fourth case also named Andrew Sealfon, then President andformer Chief Executive Officer, of KORU Medical, individuallyalleging they made materially false and/or misleading statements, as a defendant. Following a hearing held on November 14, 2018well as failed to address a motion we had filed to transfer venue, on December 7, 2018,disclose material adverse facts about the Texas Court transferred the fourth case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “California Court”). We then moved to dismiss that complaint,Company’s business, operations and Andrew Sealfon filed a separate motion to dismiss the case as to him for lack of jurisdiction.
At the same hearing on November 14, 2018, the Texas Court granted EMED leave to amend its infringement contentions to assert infringement of that sole remaining claim 9 of the ’476 patent. In April 2019, EMED served its damages expert’s report opining that EMED’s past infringement damages amount to $1.5 million, and in May KORU Medical served its damages expert’s rebuttal report opining that EMED’s expert miscalculated damages which if properly calculated would amount to less than $100,000. We moved to dismiss the case for lack of infringement. On June 24, 2019, the Texas Court Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation decision granting summary judgment in our favor, finding no infringement, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, by KORU Medical’s accused products. EMED’s objections were overruled and on June 28, 2019, the Texas Court issued a Final Judgment in favor of KORU Medical, awarded court costs to KORU Medical, and dismissed the case. A final judgment was entered and KORU Medical submitted its Bill of Costs for approximately $16,000, which was ordered granted by the Texas Court. KORU Medical also moved to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of approximately $2.5 million in defense of EMED’s assertion of the ’476 Patent. EMED appealed the non-infringement judgment to the CAFC. On April 9, 2020, the CAFC issued a unanimous decision affirming the Texas Court’s judgment of non-infringement. The Texas Court had stayed proceedingsprospects, in the district court untilCompany’s earnings communications and Form 10-Q filed during the appeal process was completed.
The SDNY ’576 matter proceeded in the New York court through claim construction on the ’576 Patent, whereupon KORU Medical filed a motion for summary judgement of non-infringement. That motion was granted onperiod August 30, 2019,4, 2020 and the New York court dismissed the lawsuit and entered a final judgement. KORU Medical submitted a Bill of Costs for approximately $1,500, to which EMED objected, and moved the New York court to declare the case exceptional and for recovery of its attorney fees and expenses of at least $1.16 million. On November 12, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that KORU Medical’s fee motion be granted, and KORU Medical be awarded approximately $1.1 million in fees and expenses. EMED filed objections to that Report and Recommendation. EMED also appealed the New York court’s judgment of non-infringement to the CAFC, which the parties had fully briefed, and were awaiting a decision from the CAFC Court.January 25, 2021.
The aforementioned district court litigation has now been finally dismissed with prejudice, and all associated appeals dismissed.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”“PART 1, ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our common stock. The following areThere have been no material changes to our risk factors since our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019:2020.
Our business could be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has and will continue affecting economies and businesses around the world. We are closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on all aspects of our business, including how it may impact our employees and business operations. While we did not incur significant disruptions during the quarter ended June 30, 2020 from the COVID-19 pandemic, we may experience disruptions that could severely impact our results of operations and financial condition. We are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our operating results and financial condition due to numerous uncertainties. These uncertainties include the geographic spread of the pandemic, the severity of the virus, the impact of the virus directly on our employees or those of our suppliers, the duration of the outbreak, governmental actions, travel restrictions and social distancing, business closures or business disruptions (including those impacting our supply chain), the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease, the availability of plasma and drugs that are administered by our products, changes to our operations, or whether the United States and additional countries are required to move to complete lock-down status, among others. Our sales representatives are unable to hold in-person meetings with customers and health care providers to discuss our products, which may impact our sales. As local jurisdictions continue to put restrictions in place, our ability to continue to manufacture our products may also be limited. Such events may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The health of our workforce and our ability to meet staffing needs at our facility cannot be predicted and is vital to our operations. We will continue to monitor the COVID-19 situation closely and intend to follow health and safety guidelines as they evolve. Further, the spread of COVID-19, which has caused a broad impact globally, may materially affect us economically. While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of,
- 24 -
COVID-19 may be difficult to assess or predict, it has resulted in significant disruption of global financial markets, which could reduce our ability to access capital, negatively affecting our liquidity. In addition, the recession resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock. The ultimate long-term impact of COVID-19 is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence.
PART II – ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Each non-employee director of the Company is eligible to receive of $50,000 annually (effective January 1, 2019) plus $10,000 for chairing a Board committee (effective February 20, 2019), all to be paid quarterly half in cash and half in common stock and pro-rated for partial service. The Chairman of the Board is eligible to receive an additional $50,000 annually (effective October 1, 2019), all to be paid in common stock. The Company issued an aggregate of 7,999 and 17,18814,615 shares of common stock to its non-employee directors during the three-month and six-month periodthree months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.2021 in accordance with its non-employee director compensation program.
On January 7, 2020, Manuel Marques, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, exercised options held by him for an aggregate 175,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate exercise price of $85,500.
On May 9, 2020, Karen Fisher, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, exercised options held by her for an aggregate 535,000 shares of common stock through delivery of previously owned shares having an aggregate fair market value of $322,294.
On May 20, 2020, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”) to settle all claims in connection with all pending litigation matters between them (the “Claims”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company issued to EMED (i) 95,238 restricted stock units, which vested on May 21, 2020 and 95,238 restricted stock units vesting on January 1, 2021, and (ii) an option to purchase up to 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $11.21 per share prior to February 1, 2021, which can be settled in cash in lieu of common stock at the Company’s sole discretion, provided that the number of shares of common stock and/or amount of cash paid by the Company upon exercise will be capped at a value of $16.21 per share. The Settlement Agreement includes mutual releases and covenants not to sue for any claim arising before May 20, 2020 and the Company covenants not to challenge any EMED patents that were the subject of the Claims unless EMED asserts them in the future against Company products.
All of the securities issued by the Company as described in this Item were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On November 16, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company may choose to purchase up to $10.0 million of its outstanding common stock through December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had purchased 683,271 shares for an aggregate $3,499,358 pursuant to this program. No purchases have been made since that time, as we continue to evaluate our cash needs in connection with strategic planning under the leadership of our new Chief Executive Officer.
- 21 -
PART II – ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
* In accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed”.
- 2522 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
REPRO MED SYSTEMS, INC. | |
August | /s/ |
| |
August | /s/ Karen Fisher |
Karen Fisher, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
- 2623 -