UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q


 
þ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011
o Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Commission file number 000-13262051-32830
 
INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer in its charter)
 
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
20-2760393
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 4336 Montgomery Ave. Bethesda, Maryland 20814
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(301) 983-0998
(Issuer’s telephone number)
 
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
 
Title of Each ClassName of exchange on which registered
Units, each consisting of one share of Common StockNYSE Amex
and two Warrants 
Common StockNYSE Amex
Common Stock Purchase WarrantsNYSE Amex
 
Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes     o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  ox Yes     o No (the Registrant is not yet required to submit Interactive Data)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o                                                                                 Accelerated Filer o
Large Accelerated Filer  o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer   o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Non-Accelerated Filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting companyþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    o Yes     þ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the issuer’s classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date.
 
Class
Shares Outstanding as of December 31, 2010August 8, 2011
 Common Stock, $.0001 Par Value17,132,03720,960,433

 
 

 
India Globalization Capital, Inc. and SubsidiariesINDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED December 31, 2010JUNE 30, 2011

Table of Contents

 
  
Page
 PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   
Item 1.3
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
  7
 
  8
   
Item 2.2124
Item 3.
3032
Item 4T.4.
3134
   
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
   
Item 1.3335
Item 1A.  3335
Item 2.35
Item 3.3635
Item 4.3635
Item 5.3635
Item 6.36
   
 37

 
 
 


PART I – Financial Information
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements
 
INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CCONSOLIONSDATEDOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


  
As of
 
  
December 31, 2010
(unaudited)
  
March 31, 2010
(audited)
 
       
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $1,470,191  $842,923 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances  5,475,428   4,783,327 
Inventories  332,345   162,418 
Advance taxes  41,452   119,834 
Deferred income taxes  -   25,345 
Dues from related parties  3,125,000   3,114,572 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,175,636   2,054,462 
Total current assets $11,620,052  $11,102,881 
Goodwill  6,167,301   6,146,720 
Property, plant and equipment, net  1,455,742   1,748,436 
Investments in affiliates  -   8,443,181 
Investments in unquoted equity securities  8,443,181   - 
Investments-others  1,081,820   810,890 
Deferred income taxes  4,575,799   4,075,461 
Restricted cash  1,902,996   2,169,939 
Other non-current assets  1,702,987   872,184 
Total assets $36,949,878  $35,369,692 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Short-term borrowings $1,416,196  $1,389,041 
Trade payables  3,683,297   1,839,405 
Accrued expenses  127,804   461,259 
Notes payable  3,920,000   4,120,000 
Dues to related parties  -   149,087 
Other current liabilities  63,008   149,942 
Total current liabilities $9,210,305  $8,108,734 
Other non-current liabilities  1,102,074   1,107,498 
Total liabilities $10,312,379  $9,216,232 
         
Shares potentially subject to rescission rights (3,307,830 shares issued and outstanding) $2,202,421   - 
         
Stockholders' equity:        
  Common stock — $.0001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 13,824,207 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 12,989,207  issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 $1,383  $1,300 
Additional paid-in capital  38,260,358   36,805,724 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (2,543,631)  (2,578,405)
Retained earnings (Deficit)  (12,648,453)  (9,452,000)
Total stockholders' equity $23,069,657  $24,776,619 
  Non-controlling interest $1,365,421  $1,376,841 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $36,949,878  $35,369,692 
         
The accompanying notes should be read in connection with the financial statements.

3


INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

  
Three months ended December 31
  
Nine months ended December 31,
 
 
2010
  
2009
  
2010
  
2009
 
             
     Revenues $484,106  $5,909,024  $3,294,103  $13,994,503 
     Cost of revenues  (457,379)  (5,326,393)  (3,053,512)  (11,829,440)
Gross profit  26,727   582,631  $240,591  $2,165,063 
     Selling, general and administrative expenses  (1,054,894)  (3,049,603)  (2,399,503)  (4,446,137)
     Depreciation  (461,627)  (101,991)  (659,002)  (519,812)
Operating income (loss) $(1,489,794) $(2,568,963) $(2,817,914) $(2,800,886)
     Compensation expenses  -   (123,139)  -   (123,139)
     Interest expense  (307,630)  (252,619)  (718,339)  (1,019,687)
     Amortization of debt discount  -   (178,218)  (356,436)  (178,218)
      Interest income  40,657   37,314   170,438   139,641 
      Equity in (gain)/loss of affiliates      16,446       16,446 
     Other income, net  (25,914)  3,570   34,558   6,836 
Income before income taxes and minority interest
attributable to non-controlling interest
 $(1,782,681) $(3,065,609) $(3,687,693) $(3,959,007)
      Income taxes benefit/ (expense)  20,212   103,281   475,226   (54,486)
Extraordinary items                
     Loss on dilution of stake in Sricon
  -   (3,205,616)  -   (3,205,616)
Net income/(loss) $(1,762,469) $(6,167,944) $(3,212,467) $(7,219,109)
     Non-controlling interests in earnings of subsidiaries  13,451   (7,574)  16,014   (72,599)
Net income / (loss) attributable to common stockholders $(1,749,018) $(6,175,518) $(3,196,453) $(7,291,708)
Earnings/(loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:                
      Basic and diluted $(0.12) $(0.06) $(0.23) $(0.11)
Weighted-average number of shares used in computing earnings per share amounts:                
      Basic and diluted  14,750,483   10,242,749   13,814,634   10,166,960 
  
All amounts in USD except share data
 
  
As of
 
  
June 30, 2011
  
March 31, 2011
 
  (unaudited)  (audited) 
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents  1,177,452   1,583,284 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances  2,927,621   3,312,051 
Inventories  182,567   133,539 
Advance taxes  41,452   41,452 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,201,886   1,474,838 
Total current assets  6,530,978   6,545,164 
Goodwill  403,498   410,454 
Property, plant and equipment, net  1,182,380   1,231,761 
Investments in affiliates  6,271,815   6,428,800 
Investments-others  913,098   877,863 
Restricted cash  1,893,839   1,919,404 
Other non-current assets  291,873   748,623 
Total assets  17,487,481   18,162,069 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Short-term borrowings  900,333   901,343 
Trade payables  1,583,610   1,311,963 
Accrued expenses  273,212   349,149 
Notes payable  3,485,254   3,920,000 
Other current liabilities  120,703   94,892 
Total current liabilities  6,363,112   6,577,347 
Other non-current liabilities  792,703   1,209,479 
Total liabilities  7,155,815   7,786,826 
         
Shares potentially subject to rescission rights (4,868,590 shares issued and outstanding)  3,082,384   3,082,384 
         
Stockholders' equity:        
  Common stock — $.0001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 16,091,843 issued and
    outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and 14,890,181  issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2011
  1,610   1,490 
 Additional paid-in capital  39,677,590   38,860,319 
 Accumulated other comprehensive income  (2,491,903)  (2,502,596)
 Retained earnings (Deficit)  (30,562,110)  (29,692,907)
  Non-controlling interest
  624,095   626,553 
Total stockholders' equity  7,249,282   7,292,859 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity  17,487,481   18,162,069 
 
The accompanying notes should be read in connection with the financial statements.
3


INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

  
All amounts in USD except share data
 
  
Three months ended June 30,
 
 
2011
  
2010
 
       
 Revenues  1,060,247   1,128,411 
     Cost of revenues (excluding depreciation)  (974,309)  (983,380)
     Selling, general and administrative expenses  (733,141)  (580,896)
     Depreciation  (51,244)  (96,444)
Operating income (loss)  (698,447)  (532,309)
     Interest expense  (300,768)  (213,098)
     Amortization of debt discount  -   (179,910)
      Interest income  67,348   62,887 
      Equity in (gain)/loss of joint venture  36,219   - 
     Other income, net  24,694   (150,467)
Income before income taxes and minority interest attributable to non-controlling interest  (870,954)  (1,012,897)
      Income taxes benefit/ (expense)  -   421,683 
Net income/(loss)  (870,954)  (591,214)
     Non-controlling interests in earnings of subsidiaries  1,751   40 
Net income / (loss) attributable to common stockholders  (869,203)  (591,174)
Earnings/(loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:        
      Basic  (0.04)  (0.05)
      Diluted  (0.04)  (0.05)
Weighted-average number of shares used in computing earnings per share amounts:        
      Basic  20,359,602   13,256,427 
      Diluted  20,359,602   13,256,427 
The accompanying notes should be read in connection with the financial statements.

 
4

 
INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLICODATEDNSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)

  
Three months ended December 31,
  
Nine months ended December 31,
 
 
2010
  
2009
  
2010
  
2009
 
             
Net income / (loss) $(1,749,018) $(6,175,518) $(3,196,453) $(7,291,708)
Foreign currency translation adjustments  60,941   2,167,829   34,774   3,357,114 
Deconsolidation of Sricon  -   (1,148,591)  -   (1,148,591)
Comprehensive income (loss) $(1,688,077) $(5,156,280) $(3,161,679) $(5,083,185)
All amounts in USD except share data
  Three months ended June 30, 
  2011  2010 
  IGC  Non-Controlling Interest  Total  IGC  Non-Controlling Interest  Total 
Net income / (loss)  (869,203)  (1,751)  (870,954)  (591,174)  (40)  (591,214)
Foreign currency translation adjustments  10,693   (707)  9,986   (350,598)  (43,784)  (394,382)
Comprehensive income (loss)  (858,510)  (2,458)  (860,968)  (941,772)  (43,824)  (985,596)

 

The accompanying notes should be read in connection with the financial statements.


 
5

 
INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLICONSDATEDOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
        Additional  Accumulated  Accumulated Other     Total 
  
Common Stock
  Paid in  Earnings  Comprehensive  Non-Controlling  Stockholders’ 
  
No of Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
(Deficit)
  
Income/(loss)
  
Interest
  
Equity
 
                      
Balance at March 31, 2009  10,091,171  $1,009  $33,186,530  $(4,662,689) $(4,929,581) $14,262,606  $37,857,875 
Stock Option for 1,413,000 grants  -   -   90,996   -   -   -   90,996 
Issue of 78,820 common stock to officers and directors
  78,820   8   39,402   -   -   -   39,410 
Issuance of Common Stock to Red Chip Companies
  15,000   2   13,198   -   -   -   13,200 
Issuance of 1,599,000 common stock to institutional investors
  1,599,000   160   1,638,690   -   -   -   1,638,850 
Issue of 530,000 common stock to Bricoleur Capital
  530,000   53   712,822   -   -   -   712,875 
Issue of 530,000 common stock to Oliveira  530,000   53   586,732   -   -   -   586,785 
Interest exp. towards of 530000 shares towards Bricoleur Capital loan
  -   -   197,412   -   -   -   197,412 
Interest exp. towards of 530000 shares towards Oliveira loan
  -   -   162,408   -   -   -   162,408 
Issue of 145,216 common stock under ATM agency agreement
  145,216   15   179,874   -   -   (10,484)  169,405 
Dividend Option  -   -   (2,340)  -   -   -   (2,340)
Loss on Translation  -   -   -   -   3,499,767   (2,219,698)  1,280,069 
Impact of de-consolidation of Sricon  -   -   -   -   (1,148,591)  -   (1,148,591)
Elimination of non-controlling interest pertaining to Sricon
  -   -   -   -   -   (10,637,093)  (10,637,093)
Net income for non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   -   (18,490)  (18,490)
Net income / (loss)  -   -   -   (4,789,311)  -   -   (4,789,311)
Balance at March 31, 2010 (audited)  12,989,207  $1,300  $36,805,724  $(9,452,000) $(2,578,405) $1,376,841  $26,153,460 
 Issuance of common stock  835,000   83   950,450   -   -   -   950,533 
Amortization of interest in debt
  -   -   359,820   -   -   -   359,820 
Dividend Option Reversed  -   -   213,381   -   -   -   213,381 
Loss on Translation  -   -   -   -   34,774   4,594   39,368 
Road show expenses for share issue  -   -   (69,017)  -   -   -   (69,017)
Net income for non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   -   (16,014)  (16,014)
Net income / (loss)  -   -   -   (3,196,453)  -   -   (3,196,453)
Balance at December 31, 2010 (unaudited)  13,824,207  $1,383  $38,260,358  $(12,648,453) $(2,543,631) $1,365,421  $24,435,078 
 
All amounts in USD except share data
  Common Stock                
  No of Shares  Amount  Additional Paid in Capital  Accumulated Earnings (Deficit)  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(loss)  Non-Controlling Interest  Total Stockholders Equity 
                      
Balance at March 31, 2010  12,989,207   1,300   36,805,724   (9,452,000)  (2,578,405)  1,376,841   26,153,460 
                             
Issue of equity shares  1,900,974   190   1,761,452   -   -       1,761,642 
Interest expense  -   -   359,820   -   -       359,820 
Dividend Option Reversed  -       2,340   -   -       2,340 
Loss for the quarter  -   -   -   (20,240,907)  -       (20,240,907)
                             
Net Income for non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   -   (769,046)  (769,046)
Loss on Translation  -   -   -   -   75,809   18,758   94,567 
Road show expense incurred towards raising capital-issue of shares  -   -   (69,017)  -   -   -   (69,017)
                             
                             
Balance at March 31, 2011 (audited)  14,890,181   1,490   38,860,319   (29,692,907)  (2,502,596)  626,553   7,292,859 
                             
 Issuance of common stock  1,201,662   120   582,004   -   -   -   582,124 
Loss on Translation  -   -   -   -   10,693   (707)  9,986 
Stock options issued  -   -   235,267   -   -   -   235,267 
Net income for non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -       (1,751)  (1,751)
Net income / (loss)  -   -   -   (869,203)  -   -   (869,203)
Balance at June 30, 2011 (unaudited)  16,091,843   1,610   39,677,590   (30,562,110)  (2,491,903)  624,095   7,249,282 

The accompanying notes should be read in connection with the financial statements.
 
 
6

 
    INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSCOOLIDATEDNSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

  
Nine months ended December 31,,
  
2010
  
2009
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income (loss) $(3,196,453) $(7,291,708)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash:        
    Non-cash compensation expense      375,758 
    Deferred taxes  (449,635)  (68,699)
    Depreciation  250,324   519,812 
    Loss/(gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment  19,503   0 
    Non-controlling interest  (16,014)  72,599 
    Amortization of debt discount  359,820   178,219 
     Deferred acquisition costs written-off  -   1,854,750 
     Loss on dilution of stake  -   3,205,616 
     Loss on extinguishment of loan  -   586,785 
     Equity and earnings of affiliates  -   (16,446)
     Non cash interest  and other expense  296,200   - 
    Unrealized exchange differences  (17,787)  - 
Changes in:        
    Accounts receivable  (674,956)  (5,364,846)
    Inventories  (169,100)  (389,904)
     Prepaid expenses and other assets  (13,600)  (94,307)
    Trade payables  1,834,662   3,621,690 
     Other liabilities  (96,177)  14,503 
     Due to / from related parties  -   118,344 
    Accrued Expenses  (333,454)  (85,935)
Net cash used in operating activities $(2,206,667) $(2,763,768)
         
Cash flow from investing activities:        
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment $2,632   (123,450)
Deposit towards acquisitions, net of cash acquired  -   (600,024)
Investment in Joint Ventures  (267,844)  - 
Restricted cash  273,750   (261,232)
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities $8,538   (984,706)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Net proceeds / repayment of  cash credit and bank overdraft  22,468   82,097 
Proceeds from other short term and long term borrowings  -   (75,879)
Repayment of long term borrowings  (200,000)  - 
Interest Paid  -   (72,710)
Proceeds from notes acquired  -   2,000,000 
Net proceeds from issue of equity shares  3,001,118   1,777,939 
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities $2,823,586  $3,711,447 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  1,811   (12,632)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  627,268   (49,659)
Cash and cash equivalent at the beginning of the period  842,923   2,129,365 
Cash and cash equivalent at the end of the period $1,470,191  $2,079,706 
All amounts in USD except share data

  Three month ended June 30, 
  2011  2010 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net income (loss)  (870,954)  (591,214)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash:        
    Non-cash compensation expense  235,267   - 
    Deferred taxes  -   (474,871)
    Depreciation  51,244   96,444 
    Non-cash financial expense (including amortization of debt discount)  307,514   179,990 
    Share in profits of joint venture  (36,219)  - 
    Unrealized exchange losses/(gains)  (24,163)  150,836 
Changes in:        
    Accounts receivable  380,930   (1,027,077)
    Inventories  (49,206)  (28,140)
    Prepaid expenses and other assets  (683,382)  1,260,845 
    Trade payables  (601,646)  (347,725)
    Other current liabilities  900,849   219,623 
    Other non – current liabilities  (418,218)  75,054 
    Non-current assets  459,280   (203,761)
    Accrued Expenses  (76,635)  (52,289)
Net cash used in operating activities  (425,339)  (742,285)
         
Cash flow from investing activities:        
   Purchase of short term investment  (3,235)  (164,223)
   Restricted cash  23,426   230,200 
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities  20,191   65,977 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
   Net movement in other short-term borrowings  -   (374,614)
   Issuance of equity shares  -   828,991 
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities  -   454,377 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (684)  (18,735)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (405,832)  (240,666)
Cash and cash equivalent at the beginning of the period  1,583,284   842,923 
Cash and cash equivalent at the end of the period  1,177,452   602,257 
         
         
Supplementary information:        
         
Cash paid for interest  Nil   16,513 
Cash paid for taxes  Nil   Nil 
The accompanying notes should be read in connection with the financial statements.

 
7

 
INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – OVERVIEW
 
a)  Description of the Company
a)  Description of the Company
 
India Globalization Capital, Inc. (‘IGC’ or ‘the Company’), a Maryland corporation, was organized on April 29, 2005 as a blank check company formed for the purpose of acquiring one or more businesses with operations primarily in India through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination or acquisition. On March 8, 2006, IGC completed an initial public offering of units, with each unit consisting of 1 share of common stock and 2 warrants to purchase a share of common stock. The units and the common stock and warrants included in the units are listed on the NYSE-AMEX exchange.
 
IGC operates in the India and China geographies specializing in the infrastructure industries.sector.  Operating as a fully integrated infrastructure company, IGC, through its subsidiaries, has expertise in mining and quarrying, road building, and engineeringthe construction of high temperature plants. The Company’s medium term plans are to expand each of these core competencies while offering an integrated suite of service offerings to our customers.  The business offerings of the Company include construction as well as a materials business. The Company has been repositionedCompany’s core businesses are its operations as a materials and construction company.
 
b)  List of subsidiaries with percentage holding
b)  List of subsidiaries with percentage holding
 
The operations of IGC are based in India. The financial statements of the following subsidiaries have been considered for consolidation.
 
SubsidiariesCountry of incorporationPercentage of holding as at Dec 31, 2010Percentage of holding as at March 31, 2010
IGC - Mauritius (‘IGC-M’)Mauritius100100
IGC India Mining and Trading Private Limited (‘IGC-IMT’)India100100
IGC Logistic Private Limited (‘IGC-L’)India100100
IGC Materials Private Limited (‘IGC-MPL’)India100100
Techni Bharathi Limited (“TBL”)India7777
Subsidiaries 
Country of
Incorporation
 
Percentage of holding
as of June 30, 2011
  
Percentage of holding
as of March 31, 2011
 
IGC - Mauritius (“IGC-M”) Mauritius  100   100 
IGC India Mining and Trading Private Limited (“IGC-IMT”) India  100   100 
IGC Logistic Private Limited (“IGC-LPL”) India  100   100 
IGC Materials Private Limited (“IGC-MPL”) India  100   100 
Techni Bharathi Limited (“TBL”) India  77   77 
 
NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
a)  Basis of preparation of financial statements
a)  Basis of preparation of financial statements
 
The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“Financial Statements”) in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements.  Therefore, the Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20102011 filed with the SEC on January 28,July 14, 2011.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair p resentationpresentation have been included in the Financial Statements.  The results for interim periods do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. The significant accounting policies adopted by the Company, in respect of these consolidated financial statements, are set out below.
 
b)  Principles of consolidation
8

b)  Principles of consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries whichthat are more than 50% owned and controlled. The financial statements of the parent company and its majority owned or controlled subsidiaries have been combined on a line by line basis by adding together the book values of all items of assets, liabilities, incomes and expenses after eliminating all inter-company balances and transactions and resulting unrealized gain or loss. Operating results of companies acquired are included from the dates of acquisition.
8


The Company accounts for investments by the equity method where its investment in the voting stock gives it the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee but not control. In situations, such as the Company’s ownership interest in Sricon Infrastructure Private Limited (“Sricon”), wherein the Company is not able to exercise significant influence in spite of having 20% or more of the voting stock, the Company has accounted for the investment based on the cost method. In addition, the Company consolidates any Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) if it is determined to be the primary beneficiary. However, as at December 31, 2010,of June 30, 2011, the Company does not have any interest in any VIE or equity method investment.

The non-controlling interest disclosed in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements represents the non-controlling interest of the former promoters in Techni Bharathi (TBL) and Sricon and the profits or losses associated with the non-controlling interest in those operations.
 
The adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810-10-65 “Consolidation — Transition and Open Effective Date Information” (previously referred to as SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51”), has resulted in the reclassification of amounts previously attributable to minority interest (now referred to as non-controlling interest) to a separate component of Shareholders’ Equityshareholders’ equity on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss).  Additionally, net income attributable to non-controlling interest is shown separately from net income in the consolidated statements of income.  This reclassification had no effect on our previously reported financ ialfinancial position or results of operations.

c)  Use of estimates
c)  Use of estimates
 
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with USU.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities on the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period reported.

Management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are prudent and reasonable.  Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to,to: allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable,receivable; future obligations under employee benefit plans,plans; the useful lives of property, plant, equipment,equipment; intangible assets,assets; the valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination,combination; impairment of goodwill and investments; recoverability of advances; the valuation of options granted and warrants issuedissued; and income tax and deferred tax valuation allowances.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Appropriate changes in estimates are made as management becomes aware of changes in circumstances surrounding the estimates. Critical accounting estimates could change from period to period and could have a material impact on IGC’s results, operations, financial position and cash flows.

Changes in estimates are reflected in the financial statements in the period in which changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

d)  Foreign currency translation
d)  Foreign currency translation
 
The consolidated financial statements are reported in United States dollars (“USD” or “$”). The functional currency of the parent Company IGC and its subsidiary IGC-M is the USD. The functional currency of IGC-IMT, IGC-L, IGC-MPL and TBLCompany's Indian subsidiaries is the Indian rupee (INR). The translationrupee.  Our financial statements reporting currency is the United States dollar.  Operating and capital expenditures of the functionalCompany's subsidiaries located in India are denominated in their local currency, which is the currency most compatible with their expected economic results.

All transactions and account balances are recorded in the local currency.  The Company translates the value of these subsidiarieslocal currency denominated assets and liabilities into USD is performed for balance sheet accounts usingU.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using month end exchange rate for the respective periods. The gains or losses resulting from suchdate.  Resulting translation adjustments are reported under ‘Accumulatedrecorded in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income’, a separate componentincome (loss).  The local currency denominated statement of Stockholders’ Equity.
Transactions in foreign currenciesincome amounts are translated into U.S. dollars using the functional currency ataverage exchange rates in effect during the rates of exchange prevailing at the date of the transaction.  Monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. The gains or losses resulting fromperiod.  Realized foreign currency transactionstransaction gains and losses are included in the statementconsolidated statements of operations.
income. The exchange rates used for translation purposes are as follows:
PeriodMonth End Average Rate (P&L rate)Year End Rate (Balance sheet rate)
Nine months ended December 31, 2009INR 48.64 per USDINR 46.40 per USD
Year ended March 31, 2010INR 47.91 per USDINR 44.95 per USD
Nine months ended December 31, 2010INR  44.95 per USDINR  44.80 per USD
Company's Indian subsidiaries do not operate in “highly inflationary” countries.
 
 
9


The exchange rates used for translation purposes are as follows:

e)  PeriodRevenue RecognitionPeriod End Average Rate (P&L rate)Period End Rate (Balance sheet rate)
Three months ended June  30, 2010INR 45.68 per USDINR 46.41 per USD
Year ended March 31, 2011INR 44.75 per USDINR 44.54 per USD
Three months ended June 30, 2011INR 44.56 per USDINR 44.59 per USD

e)  Revenue recognition
 
The majority of the revenue recognized for the nine month periodsthree months ended December 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 was derived from the Company’s subsidiaries, as follows:which derive revenue from the following sources.
 
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. In government contracting, we recognizethe Company recognizes revenue when a government consultant verifies and certifies an invoice for payment.
 
Revenue from sale of goods is recognized when substantial risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer under the terms of the contract.

For the sale of goods, the timing of the transfer of substantial risks and rewards of ownership is based on the contract terms negotiated with the buyer, e.g., FOB or CIF.  IGC considers the guidance provided under SAB 104 in determining revenue from sales of goods. Considerations have been given to all four conditions for revenue recognition under that guidance. The four conditions are:

·  Contract – Persuasive evidence of our arrangement with the customers;
·  Delivery – Based on the terms of the contracts, the Company assesses whether the underlying goods have been delivered and therefore the risks and rewards of ownership are completely transferred;
·  Fixed or determinable price – The Company enters into contracts where the price for the goods being sold is fixed and not contingent upon other factors.
·  Collection is deemed probable – At the time of recognition of revenue, the Company makes an assessment of its ability to collect the receivable arising on the sale of the goods and determines that collection is probable.

Revenue for any sale is recognized only if all of the four conditions set forth above are met. These criteria are assessed by the Company at the time of each sale.  In the absence of meeting any of the criteria set out above, the Company defers revenue recognition until all of the four conditions are met.

Revenue from construction/project related activity and contracts for supply/commissioning of complex plant and equipment is recognized as follows:
 
 a)Cost plus contracts: Contract revenue is determined by adding the aggregate cost plus proportionate margin as agreed with the customer and expected to be realized.
 b)
Fixed price contracts: Contract revenue is recognized using the percentage completion method. Percentagemethod and the percentage of completion is determined as a proportion of cost incurred-to-date to the total estimated contract cost.  Changes in estimates for revenues, costs to complete and profit margins are recognized in the period in which they are reasonably determinable.
·  In many of the fixed price contracts entered into by the Company, significant expenses are incurred in the mobilization stage in the early stages of the contract. The expenses include those that are incurred in the transportation of machinery, erection of heavy machinery, clearing of the campsite, workshop ground cost, overheads, etc.  All such costs are booked to deferred expenses and written off over the period in proportion to revenues earned.
·  Where the modifications of the original contract are such that they effectively add to the existing scope of the contract, the same are treated as a change orders.  On the other hand, where the modifications are such that they change or add an altogether new scope, these are accounted for as a separate new contract.  The Company adjusts contract revenue and costs in connection with change orders only when they are approved by both, the customer and the Company with respect to both the scope and invoicing and payment terms.
·  In the event of claims in our percentage of completion contracts, the additional contract revenue relating to claims is only accounted after the proper award of the claim by the competent authority.  The contract claims are considered in the percentage of completion only after the proper award of the claim by the competent authority.
 
10


Full provision is made for any loss in the period in which it is foreseen.
Revenue from property development activity is recognized when all significant risks and rewards of ownership in the land and/or building are transferred to the customer and a reasonable expectation of collection of the sale consideration from the customer exists.
 
Revenue from service related activities and miscellaneous other contracts are recognized when the service is rendered using the proportionate completion method or completed service contract method.
 
f)  Accounts receivable
f)  Accounts receivable
 
Accounts receivables arereceivable is recorded at the invoiced amount, taking into consideration any adjustments made by government consultants who verify and certify construction and material invoices.  The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of clients to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined by evaluating the relative credit worthiness of each client, historical collections experience and other information, including the aging of the receivables. The companyCompany did not recognize any bad debt for the ninethree months ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 and 2009 respectively.2010.  Unbilled accounts receivable represent revenue on contracts to be billed, in subsequent periods, as per the terms of the related contracts.

g)   Accounts Receivable – Long Term
 This isLong-term accounts receivables are typically for Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contracts.  It is money due to the companyCompany by the private or public sector to finance, design, construct, and operate a facility stated in a concession contract over an extended period of time.
 
h)  g) Inventories
 
Inventories primarily comprise of finished goods, raw materials, work in progress, stock at customer site, stock in transit, components and accessories, stores and spares, scrap and residue.  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value.
10

The cost of various categories of inventories is determined on the following basis:

·
Raw Materialmaterial is valued at weighed average of landed cost (purchase price, freight inward and transit insurance charges).
·
Work in progress is valued as confirmed, valued and certified by the technicians and site engineers and finished goods at material cost plus appropriate share of labor cost and production overheads.
·Components and accessories, stores erection, materials, spares and loose tools are valued on a first-in-first out basis.

h)  Investments
i)  Investments:
 
Investments in marketable securities, available for sale: Marketable securities, available for sale are carriedinitially measured at fair value as determined by reference to prevailing market prices.  Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity until realized.  Realized gains and losses from the sale of securities are determined on a specific identification basis on a trade date basis and are included in statement of operations.  A decline incost, which is the fair value of any available-for-sale security, below cost, that is deemed to be other than temporary, results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value.  This impairment is charged to statement of operations and a new cos t basisthe consideration given for the security is established.
Investments in unquoted securities: Investments in unquoted securities are carried at cost and adjusted for declines in value deemed to be other than temporary.
Investments in associates: them, including transaction costs.  The Company's equity in the earnings/(losses) of affiliates is included in the statement of income and the Company's share of net assets of affiliates is included in the balance sheet. Where the Company’s ownership interest in spite of being in excess of 20% is not sufficient to exercise significant influence, the Company has accounted for the investment based on the cost method.
 
j)   Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E):
i)  Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E)
 
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:

Buildings
25 years
Plant and machinery
20 years
Computer equipment
3 years
Office equipment
5 years
Furniture and fixtures
5 years
Vehicles
5 years
 
Upon disposition, cost and related accumulated depreciation of the property and equipment are removedde-recognized from the books of accounts and the gain or loss is reflected in the results of operation.  Cost of additions and substantial improvements to property and equipment are capitalized in the books of accounts.  The cost of maintenance and repairs of the property and equipment are charged to operating expenses.
 
k)  Impairment of long – lived assets
j)  Impairment of long – lived assets
 
The Company reviews its long-lived assets, with finite lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be fully recoverable. Such circumstances include, though are not limited to, significant or sustained declines in revenues or earnings and material adverse changes in the economic climate.  For assets that the Company intends to hold for use, if the total of the expected future undiscounted cash flows produced by the assets or subsidiary company is less than the carrying amount of the assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the assets.  For assets the Company intends to dispose of by sale, a loss is recognized for the amount by which the estimated fair value less cost to sell is less t hanthan the carrying value of the assets.  Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices, if available, or other valuation techniques including discounted future net cash flows.
  
11

Earnings per common share
 
l)  Earnings/(loss) per common share
The Company presents basic and diluted earnings/(loss)Basic earnings per share (EPS) data for its common stock. Basic EPS is calculatedcomputed by dividing the profit or loss attributablenet income (loss) applicable to the common stockholders of the Company by the weighted average number of common stockshares outstanding duringfor the period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjustingearnings per share reflect the profit or loss attributable to common stockholdersadditional dilution from all potentially dilutive securities such as stock warrants and the weighted average number of common stock outstanding adjusted for the effects of all potential dilutive common stock which comprise convertible and redeemable preference shares and share options granted to employees.options.
 
m)  Income taxes
l)  Income taxes
 
Deferred incomeIncome taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax is provided for the differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial reportingstatement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted income tax purposes.rates applicable to the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is establishedrecorded when necessary to reducemanagement determines that some or all of the deferred tax assets to the amount expectedare not likely to be realized.   IGC expects to realize sufficient earnings
In evaluating a tax position for recognition, management evaluates whether it is more-likely-than-not that a position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, based on technical merits of the position. If the tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the tax position is measured and profits to utilize deferred tax assets as it begins (1) invoicing its subsidiaries for services and (2) establishes iron ore sales contracts with customers in China and other countries. The Company has obtained contracts for the supply of around $200 million of iron ore to customers in China over a period of 5 years commencing in fiscal year 2011. However since there has been a delayrecognized in the Company’s ability to supply iron ore pursuant tofinancial statements as the above contracts, owing to some regulatory restrictions relating to exportlargest amount of iron ore outtax benefit that, in management’s judgment, is greater than 50% likely of India, the Company believes that it would be prudent to create a valuation allowancebeing realized upon settlement. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, there was no significant liability for the losses of the current quarter.income tax associated with unrecognized tax benefits.

n)  m) Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
For financial statement purposes, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with maturity of three months or less, when purchased to be cash equivalents. The companyCompany maintains its cash in bank accounts in the United States of America, Mauritius and India, which at times may exceed applicable insurance limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalent.  The companyCompany does not invest its cash in securities that have an exposure to U.S. mortgages.
 
o)  Restricted cash:
n)  Restricted cash:
 
Restricted cash consists of deposits pledged to various government authorities and deposits used as collateral with banks for guarantees and letters of credit, given by the Company to its customers or vendors.
 
p)  Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12

 
At December 31, 2010
o)  Fair value of financial instruments
As of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2010,2011, the carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments, which included cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, unbilled accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable, accrued employee compensation and benefits and other accrued expenses, approximate their fair values due to the nature of the items.
 
q)  Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
p)  Concentration of credit risk and significant customers
 
Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents, investments, derivatives, accounts receivable and unbilled accounts receivable.  The Company places its cash, investments and derivatives in highly-rated financial institutions.  The Company adheres to a formal investment policy with the primary objective of preservation of principal, which contains credit rating minimums and diversification requirements. Management believes its credit policies reflect normal industry terms and business risk.  The Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties and, accordingly, does not require collateral.
 
A significant portion of the Company’s sales is to key customers.  Ten such customers accounted for approximately 77% of gross accounts receivable as of June 30, 2011.  At December 31,June 30, 2010, fiveseven clients accounted for approximately 91% of gross accounts receivable. At March 31, 2010, four clients accounted for approximately 68%93% of gross accounts receivable.
 
12

Table of Contentsq)  Accounting for goodwill and related impairment
r)  Business combinations
The Company accounts for acquired businesses by using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets acquired including identifiable intangibles and liabilities assumed are recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. The cost to acquire a business comprises of cash paid, the fair value of shares issued, amounts that are contingently payable and amounts payable on the basis of earn-out arrangements, deferred consideration and transaction costs. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The primary drivers that generate goodwill are the value of synergies between the acquired entities and the company and the acquired assembled workforce, neither of which qualifies as an identifiable intangible asset.
s)  Goodwill / Impairment
 
Goodwill represents the excess cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Company'sour share of net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries is disclosed separately. Goodwill is stated at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses incurred, if any.

The Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Others”, (previously referred to as SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", which sets forth the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. ASC 350 requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be allocated to the reporting unit level, which the Company defines as each legal entity.
subsidiary. ASC 350 also prohibits the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lifeindefinite-lived intangible assets upon adoption, but requires that they be tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently as warranted, at the reporting unit level.

TheAs per ASC 350-20-35-4 through 35-19, the impairment testing of goodwill impairment test under ASC 350 is performed in two phases.a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of thea reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amountfair value of thea reporting unit exceeds its fair value,carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, and step two ofthus the impairment test must be performed. The second step of the impairment test quantifies the amount of the impairment loss by comparingis unnecessary.  If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, compares the implied fair value. An impairment loss is recorded to the extentvalue of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds itsthe implied fair value. of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.  The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.  After a goodwill impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of goodwill shall be its new accounting basis.  Subsequent reversal of a previously recognized goodwill impairment loss is prohibited once the measurement of that loss is completed.

In ASC 350.20.20 a reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment.  A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component.   The Company has determined that IGC operates in a single operating segment.  While the CEO reviews the consolidated financial information for the purposes of decisions relating to resource allocation, the CFO, on a need basis, looks at the financial statements of the individual legal entities in India for the limited purpose of consolidation. Given the existence of discrete financial statements at an individual entity level in India, the Company believes that each of these entities constitute a separate reporting unit under a single operating segment.

Therefore, the first step in the impairment testing for goodwill is the identification of reporting units and the allocation of goodwill to these reporting units. Accordingly, TBL, which is one of the legal entities is also considered a separate reporting unit and therefore the Company believes that the assessment of goodwill impairment at the subsidiary level, which is also a reporting unit, is appropriate.
 
t)  Reclassifications
13


The analysis of fair value is based on the estimate of the recoverable value of the underlying assets. For long lived assets such as land, the Company obtains appraisals from independent professional appraisers to determine the recoverable value. For other assets such as receivables, the recoverable value is determined based on an assessment of the collectability and any potential losses due to default by the counter parties. Unlike goodwill, long lived assets are assessed for impairment only where there are any specific indicators for impairment.

r)  Reclassifications
 
Certain prior yearperiod balances have been reclassified to the presentation of the current year.period.

s)  Recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements

Changes to U.S. GAAP are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in the form of accounting standards updates ("ASU"s) to the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. Newly issued ASUs not listed below are expected to have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations, because either the ASU is not applicable or the impact is expected to be immaterial.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the disclosures about an entity's use of fair value measurements.  Under these amendments, entities will be required to provide enhanced disclosures about transfers into and out of the Level 1 (fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities) and Level 2 (fair value determined based on significant other observable inputs) classifications, provide separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to the tabular reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of the Level 3 (fair value determined based on significant unobservable inputs) classification and provide greater disaggregation for each class of assets and liabilities that use fair value measurements.  Except for the detailed Level 3 roll-forward disclosures, the new standard was effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2009.  The adoption of this accounting standards amendment did not have a material impact on the Company's disclosure or consolidated financial results. The requirement to provide detailed disclosures about the purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll-forward activity for Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2010.  The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company's disclosure or consolidated financial results.

In December 2010, the FASB issued a new accounting standard, which requires that Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test be performed for reporting units whose carrying value is zero or negative.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years.  Our adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's disclosure or consolidated financial results.

In December 2010, the FASB issued new guidance clarifying some of the disclosure requirements related to business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis.  Specifically, the guidance states that, if comparative financial statements are presented, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only.  Additionally, the new standard expands the supplemental pro forma disclosure required by the authoritative guidance to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings.  This guidance became effective January 1, 2011.  Our adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's disclosure or consolidated financial results.  However, it may result in additional disclosures in the event that we enter into a business combination that is material on either an individual or a consolidated basis.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”. This update defines fair value, clarifies a framework to measure fair value and requires specific disclosures of fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2012 and is required to be applied retrospectively. The Company does not expect adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, which is now part of ASC 220: “Presentation of Comprehensive Income". The new guidance will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The standard does not change the items, which must be reported in other comprehensive income. These provisions are to be applied retrospectively and will be effective for us as of January 1, 2012. Because this guidance impacts presentation only, it will have no effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
NOTE 3 – OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT ASSETS
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
 
  
As of
 
  
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
 
       
Prepaid expenses $93,534  $52,087 
Advances to suppliers  741,258   1,231,771 
Security and other advances  28,374   - 
Discount on issuances of debt  -   414,166 
Deposits and other current assets  312,470   356,438 
  $1,175,636  $2,054,462 
13

  All amounts in USD except share data 
  As of 
  June 30, 2011  March 31, 2011 
       
Prepaid expenses
  
80,950
   
103,841
 
Advances to suppliers
  
1,710,070
   
1,024,399
 
Security and other deposits
  
70,553
   
            85,277
 
Prepaid Interest
  
-
   
159,825
 
Other current assets
  
340,313
   
101,496
 
   
2,201,886
   
1,474,838
 
 
Other non-current assets consist of the following:
 
 All amounts in USD except share data 
 
As of
  As of 
 
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
  June 30, 2011 March 31, 2011 
           
Trade and other sundry debtors $957,181  $268,145  
142,969
 
396,275
 
Other advances  745,806   604,039   
148,904
  
352,348
 
 $1,702,987  $872,184   
291,873
  
748,623
 
 

NOTE 4 – SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
 
There is no current portion of long-term debt that is classified as short-term borrowings. Short term borrowings consist of the following:
 
 All amounts in USD except share data 
 
As of
  As of 
 
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
  June 30, 2011 March 31, 2011 
           
Secured liabilities $964,367  $1,087,775  
900,333
 
901,343
 
Unsecured liabilities  451,829   301,266   
-
  
-
 
 $1,416,196  $1,389,041   
900,333
  
901,343
 
15


The above secured liabilities aredebt is secured by hypothecation of materials, stock of spares, Workwork in Progress,progress, receivables and property and equipment, in addition to a personal guarantee of three India-based directors, and are guaranteedcollaterally secured by personal guaranteesmortgage of the Company’s Indian subsidiaries’ directors and also secured by a mortgage of company’srelevant subsidiary’s land and other immovablefixed properties of the directors and their relatives. The average interest rate for these obligations was 12% to 14% for the nine months ended December 31, 2010.
 
Unsecured liabilities stated above include $261,222 due to the promoters of TBL. The Company disputes this liability and is currently negotiating with the promoters for a settlement.
NOTE 5 – OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
 
  
As of
 
  
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
 
       
Statutory dues payable $11,492  $35,734 
Employee related liabilities  42,490   90,207 
Other liabilities  9,026   24,001 
  $63,008  $149,942 
14

  All amounts in USD except share data 
  As of 
  June 30, 2011  March 31, 2011 
       
Statutory dues payable
  
18,158
   
17,745
 
Employee related liabilities
  
102,545
   
77,147
 
   
120,703
   
94,892
 
 
Other non-current liabilities consist of the following:
 
 All amounts in USD except share data 
 
As of
  As of 
 
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
  June 30, 2011 March 31, 2011 
           
Sundry creditors $1,102,074  $1,107,498  
792,703
 
$
1,209,479
 
Provision for expenses  -   -   
-
    
 $1,102,074  $1,107,498   
792,703
 
$
1,209,479
 

Sundry creditors consist primarily of creditors to whom amounts are due for supplies and materials received in the normal course of business.

NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
The fair value of the Company’s current assets and current liabilities approximate their carrying value because of their short termshort-term nature.  Such financial instruments are classified as current and are expected to be liquidated within the next twelve months.
 
16

NOTE 7 – GOODWILL
 
The changemovement in goodwill balance is given below:below.
 
 
As of
  All amounts in USD except share data 
 
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
  As of 
       June 30, 2011 March 31, 2011 
Balance at the beginning of the period $6,146,720  $17,483,501  410,454  6,146,720 
Elimination on deconsolidation of Sricon  -   (10,576,123)
Impairment loss
 
-
 
(5,792,849)
 
Effect of foreign exchange translation  20,581   (760,658)  
(6,956)
  
56,583
 
 $6,167,301  $6,146,720   
403,498
  
     410,454
 

During the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company conducted the impairment analysis regarding the goodwill in its consolidated financial statements. The goodwill balance of $6.2 million was completely allocated to the reporting unit, which has been determined to be TBL. The Company, based on the impairment analysis, concluded that the fair value of the reporting unit, established on the basis of its recoverable value, was substantially lower than the carrying value. Therefore, the goodwill balance allocated to the reporting unit was impaired. The Company recorded an impairment loss relating to the goodwill balance amounting to $5,792,849. For this impairment test, the Company considered all the recorded assets and liabilities of TBL at its respective fair values. In relation to the fixed assets, the Company considered the fair values on the basis of independent valuations obtained while for the other current assets, the carrying values were determined by the Company and these were found to approximate their fair values. There have been no further indicators in the current quarter and therefore the Company has not performed any specific impairment tests for the goodwill balance in books.

NOTE 8 –NOTES PAYABLE
 
On October 5, 2009, the Company consummated the exchange of an outstanding promissory note in the total principal amount of $ 2,000,000$2,000,000 (the “Original Note”) initially issued to the Steven M. Oliveira 1998 Charitable Remainder Unitrust (‘Oliveira’(“Oliveira”) for a new promissory note (the “New Oliveira Note”) on substantially the same terms as the original note except that the principal amount of the New Oliveira Note was $ 2,120,000$2,120,000 which reflected the accrued but unpaid interest on the Original Note and the New Oliveira Note did not bear interest. The New Oliveira Note was unsecured and was due and payable on October 4, 2010 (the “Maturity Date”).  Prior to the Maturity Date, the Company was permitted to pre-pay the New Oliveira Note at any time without penalty or premium.  The New Oliveira Note 60;Note is not convertible into IGC Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) or other securities of the Company. However, under the Note and Share Purchase Agreement (the “Oliveira Note and Share Purchase Agreement”), effective as of October 4, 2009, by and among the Company and Oliveira, as additional consideration for the exchange of the Original Note, the Company agreed to issue 530,000 shares of Common Stock to Oliveira.  The Oliveira Note remains outstanding.
15


On October 16, 2009, the Company consummated the sale of a promissory note in the principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “Bricoleur Note”) to Bricoleur Partners, L.P. (‘Bricoleur’(“Bricoleur”).  There was no interest payable on the Note and the Note was due and payable on October 16, 2010 (the “Maturity Date”).  Prior to the Maturity Date, the Company could pre-pay the Bricoleur Note at any time without penalty or premium and the Note was unsecured.  The Note was not convertible into the Company’s Common Stock or other securities of the Company.  However, under the Note and Share Purchase Agreement (the “Bricoleur Note and Share Purchase Agreement”), effective as of October 16, 2009, by and among the Company and Bricoleur, as additional consideration for the investment in the Bricoleur Note, IGC issue dissued 530,000 shares of Common Stock to Bricoleur.  The Bricoleur Note remains outstanding.

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued an additional 200,000 shares of Common Stock to each of Oliveira and Bricoleur specified above pursuant to the effective agreements respectively as penalties for failure to repay the promissory notes when due.  During the three months ended December 31, 2010,
17


In March 2011, the Company had discussionsfinalized agreements with the Steven M. Oliveira 1998 Charitable Remainder Unitrust (“Oliveira”) and Bricoleur regarding extending the terms of the two promissory notes respectively.  Subsequent to December 31, 2010, the Company reached agreements in principle with Oliveira and BricoleurPartners, L.P. (“Bricoleur”) to exchange the existing promissory notesnote issued to Oliveira on October 5, 2009 (the “New Oliveira Note”) and the promissory note issued to Bricoleur on October 16, 2009 (the “Bricoleur Note”) respectively for new promissory notes with later maturity datesdates. The Oliveira Note will be due on March 24, 2012, will bear interest at a rate of 30% per annum and will provide for monthly payments of principal and interest, which the Company may choose to settle through the issuance of equity shares at an equivalent value.  The Bricoleur Note will be due on June 30, 2011 with no prior payments due and will not bear interest.   However as set forthat the date of filing of this report, the Company is negotiating a further restructuring of this payable but the same is not yet consummated. The Company issued additional 688,500 shares of its common stock to Bricoleur in Note 18 - Subsequent Events.connection with the extension of the term regarding the Bricoleur note.

The Company’s total interest expense was $ 374,137300,768 and $ 355,586213,098 for the three months ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2009 respectively.  Similarly, the total interest expense for the nine month period ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $ 1,410,464 and $ 767,068 respectively. June 30, 2010 respectively.  No interest was capitalized by the Company for the periodthree months ended December 31, 2010.June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
The Company had agreed to pay Integrated Global Network, LLC (“IGN, LLC”), an affiliate of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mukunda, an administrative fee of $4,000 per month for office space and general and administrative services.  Aservices from the closing of the Public Offering through the date of a Business Combination.  For the three months ended June 30, 2011, a total of $ 12,000 and $ 36,000$12,000 was paidaccrued as rent payable to IGN LLC out of which $12,000 was outstanding as of June 30, 2011.
The Company uses the services of Economic Law Practice (ELP), a law firm in India.  A member of our Board of Directors, prior to his resignation on March 15, 2011, was a Partner of ELP.  From inception till March 15, 2011, the Company has incurred $186,303 in fees to ELP.  After the resignation of the director, ELP is no longer considered to be a related party of the Company

One of the Company’s subsidiaries, TBL, has an accounts receivable due from Sricon, an affiliate of the Company, amounting to $3,114,572. This amount was advanced by TBL to Sricon to fund a bid on a new contract and provide the working capital requirement for the three monthscontract. Subsequently, due to certain disputes that have arisen between Sricon and nine months ended December 31, 2010.IGC, the receivable of $3.1 million remains outstanding.  Sricon is unwilling to pay the amount as it seeks to offset the amount as an equity payment from IGC.  However, the amount was advanced from TBL, not from IGC, and TBL has no equity in Sricon.  Further, the two entities, IGC and TBL, are legally different companies and therefore TBL has legal remedies under Indian law.  The Company has engaged Indian counsel who is in the process of preparing the case to pursue the recovery of this receivable.   From an accounting perspective, the Company has fully provided for this receivable due to the dispute although it intends to pursue collection of this receivable through an appropriate legal process in India. The said provision is contained in the selling, general and IGN, LLC have agreed to continueadministrative expenses of the agreement on a month-to-month basis.Company for the year ended March 31, 2011.
 
 NOTE 10 -COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCY
 
No significant commitments and contingencies were made or incurred during the three month periodmonths ended December 31, 2010.June 30, 2011.
 
NOTE 11 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
 
 All amounts in USD except share data 
 As of  As of 
 
Dec 31, 2010
  
March 31, 2010
  June 30, 2011 March 31, 2011 
           
Land $10,870  $10,870  
10,967
 
10,870
 
Buildings  173,476   172,935  
351,343
 
351,147
 
Plant and machinery  3,250,617   3,253,444  
3,328,753
 
3,335,065
 
Furniture and fixtures  88,656   88,860  
88,595
 
87,768
 
Computer equipment  209,360   209,012  
213,640
 
213,178
 
Vehicles  480,650   478,749  
483,319
 
479,478
 
Office equipment  164,333   161,680  
170,505
 
167,563
 
Capital work-in-progress  136,898   136,440   
137,546
  
137,696
 
 $4,514,860  $4,511,990  
4,784,668
 
4,782,765
 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (3,059,118)  (2,763,554)  
(3,602,288)
  
(3,551,004
)
 $1,455,742  $1,748,436   
1,182,380
  
1,231,761
 
 
 
1618

 
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three month periodmonths ended December 31,June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 was $51,244 and December 31, 2009 was $ 461,627 and $ 101,991 respectively. Similarly, depreciation and amortization expense for the nine month period ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $ 659,002 and $ 519,812$96,444 respectively.  Capital work-in-progress represents advances paid towards the acquisition of property and equipment and the cost of property and equipment not put to use before the balance sheet date.

NOTE 12 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
On April 1, 2009 the Company adopted ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, (previously referred to as SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment).  ASC 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. As of December 31, 2010,June 30, 2011, the Company granted 78,820 shares of common stock and 1,413,000a total of 2,786,450 stock options (1,413,000 granted in 2009 and 1,370,450 stock options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2011) to its directors and employees.   All of the options vested fully on the date of the grant.  The exercise price of each of the options is $1.00 and $0.56 per share, respectively, and each of the options will expire on May 13, 2014.2014 and June 27, 2016, respectively.  The aggregate fair value of the underlying stock on the grant date was $39,41 0$39,410 and the fair value of the stock options on the grant datedates was $90,997.  No share-based compensation was recognized for the three or nine month periods ended December 31, 2010 since no grants were made under the 2008 Omnibus Plan during those periods.$90,997 and $235,267, respectively. As of December 31, 2010,June 30, 2011, an aggregate of 471,045116,030 shares of common stock remain available for future grants of options or stock awards under the 2008 Omnibus Plan.
 
NOTE 13 - DECONSOLIDATIONThe fair value of stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes Pricing Model with the following assumptions for options awarded as of June 30, 2011:
 
Effective October 1, 2009, the Company decreased its ownership in Sricon from 63% to 22.3%.  On March 7, 2008 the Company consummated the Sricon Acquisition by purchasing 63% for $ 28,690,266 (based on an exchange rate of 40 INR for 1 USD).   Subsequently, the Company effectively borrowed, through an intermediary company, $ 17,900,000 (based on 40 INR for 1 USD) from Sricon.  The Company repaid the $17,900,000 debt by selling a portion of its ownership in Sricon, which was thereby reduced from 63% to 22.3%, a minority interest.  The accounting of the decrease in ownership, or deconsolidation of Sricon from the balance sheet of IGC, resulted in the de-consolidation of Sricon and a one-time charge on the income statement.
The equity dilution of 40.7% resulted in a consideration of $17,900,000. Following the guidance under ASC 810-10, the parent derecognized the assets, liabilities and equity components (including the amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income) related to Sricon.  IGC recorded a loss of $785,073 and further reclassified an accumulated AOCI loss of $2,098,492 in the income statement as a result of the dilution.  Deferred acquisition costs related to Sricon amounted to $1,854,750, which were subsequently recorded in the income statement for the fiscal year that ended March 31, 2010. The Company initially accounted for its remaining 22.3% interest in Sricon by the equity method.
Expected life of options
 
Granted in 2009
5 years
  
Granted in the current quarter 5 years
 
Vested options
  100%  100%
Risk free interest rate
  1.98%  4.10%
Expected volatility
  35.35%  83.37%
Expected dividend yield
 
Nil
  
Nil
 

During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, in spite of the efforts made by IGC to obtain Sricon’s financial statements, the management at Sricon has not provided the information required by IGC to value its interest in SriconThe volatility estimate was derived using the equity method of accounting. As per the guidance laid down under ASC 323-10-15-10, one of the indicators that rebut the presumption of ‘significant influence’ is when an investor needs or wants more financial information to apply the equity method than is available to the investee's other shareholders (for example, the investor wants quarterly financial information from an investee that publicly reports only annually), tries to obtain that information, and fails. Accordingly, the Company has not been able to obtain information required for applying the equity method of accounting f rom the management at Sricon. Thereforehistorical data for the period ended December 31, 2010, the Company is valuing the investment in Sricon at cost.IGC stock.
 
NOTE 1413 – COMMON STOCK
 
The Company has three securities listed on the NYSE Amex:
·  common stock, $.0001 par value (ticker symbol: IGC),
·  redeemable warrants to purchase common stock (ticker symbol: IGC.WS) and
·   (1) common stock, $.0001 par value (ticker symbol: IGC), (2) redeemable warrants to purchase common stock (ticker symbol: IGC.WT), and (3) units consisting of one share of common stock and two redeemable warrants to purchase common stock (ticker symbol: IGC.U).
17

one share of common stock and two redeemable warrants to purchase common stock (ticker symbol: IGC.U).  The units may be separated into common stock and warrants.  Each warrant (an “IPO Warrant”) entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00. The IPO Warrantswarrants issued in our initial public offering that were to expire on March 3, 2011, or earlier upon redemption.  are now to expire on March 8, 2013 since the Company exercised its right to extend the terms of those warrants.   

The registration statement for the Company's initial public offering was declared effective on March 2, 2006. The IPO Warrantswarrants are exercisable and may be exercised by contacting the CompanyIGC or the transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.  The Company has a right to call the IPO Warrants,warrants, provided the common stock has traded at a closing price of at least $ 8.50$8.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the date on which notice of redemption is given.  If the Company calls the warrants, either the holder will either have to redeemexercise the warrants by purchasing the common stock from usthe Company for $5.00 or the warrants will expire.
In connection with the Company’s initial public offering, it sold the underwriter a unit purchase option (“UPO”) to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 units (“UPO Units”) at an exercise price of $7.50 per UPO Unit.  Like the units listed under the ticker symbol IGC.U, the UPO Units consist of one share of common stock and two warrants each exercisable to purchase one share of common stock. (the “UPO Warrants”).  The UPO Warrants are identical to the IPO Warrants except that the UPO Warrants have an exercise price of $6.25 per share rather than $5.00 per share. Neither the UPO Units nor the UPO Warrants are listed on any securities exchange.

On January 9, 2009, the Company completed an exchange of 11,943,878 IPO Warrantsa tender offer with respect to warrants issued in its initial public offering and certain other warrants issued in private placementsplacements.  An aggregate of 11,943,878 warrants were exercised pursuant to the terms of the tender offer in exchange for 311,064 new sharesan aggregate of common stock.
On May 13, 2009 we granted 78,8201,311,064 shares of common stock, to our directorsof which 2,706,350 warrants were exercised with an aggregate cash payment of $297,698.50 in exchange for an aggregate of 541,270 shares of Common Stock and employees.   9,237,528 warrants were exercised by exchange of warrants in exchange for an aggregate of 769,794 shares of Common Stock.

On July 13, 2009, wethe Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock to RedChip Companies Inc. for investor relations services rendered. The value of these services was $13,200 and the per-share value was $0.88.  The cost of the common shares was expensed in the quarter.
 
19


On September 18,15, 2009, the Company soldentered into a securities purchase agreement (“Registered Direct”) with institutional investors for the sale and issuance of an aggregate of 1,599,000 shares of itsour common stock and warrants (“the Registered Direct Warrants”) to purchase up to 319,800 shares of our common stock, for a total purchase price of $ 1,998,750 pursuant to a securities purchase agreement with institutional investors.$1,998,750.  The common stock and Registered Direct Warrantswarrants were sold on a per unit basis at a purchase price of $1.25 per unit.  The shares of common stock and warrants were issued separately.  Each investor received one warrant representing the right to purchase, at an exercise price of $1.60 per share, a number of shares of common stock equal to 20% of the number of shares of common stock purchased by the investor in the offering.  The sales were made pursuant to a shelf registration statement. The Registered Direct W arrantswarrants issued to the investors in the offering will beare exercisable any time on or after the date of issuance until they expire on September 18, 2012.for a period of three years from that date. The Black Scholes value of the warrants associated with the Registered Direct Warrants are not listed on any securities exchange.is $71,411. The Black Scholes price of the warrants was expensed in the quarter.
 
As discussed in Note 8 above, inOn October 5, 2009, the Company raised additional funds and restructured existing loans and in consideration of thisIGC issued 1,060,000530,000 new shares of common stock.stock to Steven M. Oliveira 1998 Charitable Remainder Unitrust (“Oliveira”) as partial consideration for the exchange of an outstanding promissory note for a new interest-free note of $2.1 million with an extended due date of October 10, 2010. The value of the shares was $911,600 or $1.72 per share. IGC consummated this transaction in order to maintain its working capital and to extend the note by one year. The value of the shares was amortized over the life of the loan.

InOn October 13, 2009, the CompanyIGC entered into an At The Market (“ATM”) Agency Agreement with Enclave Capital LLC.  Under the ATM Agency Agreement, the Company couldIGC may offer and sell shares of itsour common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $ 4$4 million from time to time with salestime.  Sales of the shares, toif any, will be made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the NYSE Amex at market prices, or as otherwise agreed with Enclave.  The Company estimates that the net proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock that are being offered will be approximately $3.73 million.  IGC intends to use the net proceeds from the sale of securities offered for working capital needs, repayment of indebtedness, and other general corporate purposes. For the year ended March 31, 2010, the Company sold 145,216 shares of our common stock under the ATM Agency Agreement.stock. During the ninetwelve months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2010,2011, the Company issued an additional 1,127,0002,292,760 shares of common stock under this agreement. As a result of the events described in Note 17 - Redeemable Securities, the Company has terminated the ATM.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2010 the Company alsoOn October 16, 2009, IGC issued 30,000530,000 new shares of common stock to American Capital Ventures and Maplehurst Investment Group for services rendered.in a private placement. The Company also issued a total of 400,000 shares of common stock as a consideration for the extensionshares was the $2,000,000 proceeds from an IGC promissory note payable made for one year with no interest to Bricoleur Partners, L.P. (“Bricoleur”).  IGC consummated this transaction in order to supplement its working capital and to expand its ore and quarry businesses.  The shares were valued at $1,107,700 and $2.09 per share.  The value of the loans undershares was amortized over the promissory notes described in Note 8 - Notes Payable duringlife of the nine months ended December 31, 2010.loan.

On December 8, 2010, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,575,830 shares of its common stock and warrants (the “2010 Warrants”) to purchase up to 858,610 shares of common stock, for a total purchase price of $ 1,391,260.$1,391,260.  The common stock was sold at a purchase price of $0.60 per share. Investors in the offering were entitled to receive a 2010 Warrant to purchase one share of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.90 per share for each three shares of common stock purchased in the offering.  The 2010 Warrants issued to the investors in the offering are exercisable at any time on or after the date of issuance until they expire on December 8, 2017.   The 2010 Warrants are not listed on any securities exchange.

During the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, the Company also issued 30,000 shares of common stock to American Capital Ventures and Maplehurst Investment Group for services rendered and 9,135 shares to Red Chip Companies valued at $ 8,039 for investor relation related services rendered.

The Company also issued a total of 400,000 shares of common stock as a consideration for the extension of the loans under the promissory notes described in Note 8 - Notes Payable during the twelve months ended March 31, 2011.

In February 2011, the Company consummated another transaction with Bricoleur to exchange the promissory note held by Bricoleur for a new note with an extended repayment term. The Company issued 688,500 shares of common stock valued at approximately $419,985 as consideration for the exchange.
On March 2011, the Company and Oliveira agreed to exchange the promissory note held by Oliveira for a new note with an extended repayment term and provisions permitting the Company at its discretion to repay the loan through the issuance of equity shares at a stated value over a specific term. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has issued 1,570,001 shares of common stock valued at $ 798,176 to this debt holder, which constituted an element of repayment of principal as well as the interest in equated installments.
Following the issuance of the shares in the preceding transactions, as of December 31, 2010, 17,132,037June 30, 2011, 20,960,433 shares of common stock are outstanding along with warrants to purchase an aggregate of 12,972,532 shares of common stock, which are outstanding and UPOs to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 UPO Units.outstanding.
18


Further, as set forth in Note 12, the Company has also issued 1,413,0002,786,450 stock options to some of its directors and employees pursuant to a stock option plan all of which are outstanding as at December 31, 2010.June 30, 2011.
20

 
NOTE 1514 - INCOME TAXES
 
The provision forCompany did not record any income taxes resulted in a tax benefit (net of $ 20,212 invaluation allowance) or expense for the three months period ended December 31, 2010 comparedJune 30, 2011. The operations of the Company have continued to sustain losses during the current quarter. As a benefit of $ 103,281result, there are no taxable profits that would entail an income tax expense. Further, in March 2011, the Company created a valuation allowance for the same period in 2009.  Theentire balance of deferred tax assets due to the continued losses sustained by the Company. Given that the Company continues to sustain losses during the current quarter, the Company believes that it is appropriate to not record any income tax benefit in the current quarter is attributable to theform of deferred taxes arising on temporary differences in respect(net of the Company’s Indian subsidiaries primarily due to differences in the book base and tax base of property, plant and equipment. The primary reason for the deferred tax assets of $ 4,575,799 is on account of tax attributes related to deferred interest expense, NOL’s and foreign tax credits. As stated in the Company’s amended Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, a valuation allowance is not taken because of $200 million in new contracts over 5 years commencing in fiscal year 2011.   The Company believes that newly acquired contracts will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize the Company’s tax assets recorded as of December 31, 2010.   However given that the Company has sustained further losses in the current quarter, based on prudence, the Company believes that it would be appropriate to create a valuation allowance for the losses of the current quarter.allowance). Refer to Note 1920 - Income Taxes to the audited financial statements contained in the Company’s Amended Form 10-K for more details on utilization of tax assets.

The Company recorded a corresponding income tax benefit amounting to $421,863 in respect of the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

NOTE 1615 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
Accounting pronouncements establish standards for the manner in which public companies report information about operating segments in annual and interim financial statements. Operating segments are component of an enterprise about which separatethat have distinct financial information is available that isand evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker ("CODM"(“CODM”) on deciding onto decide how to allocate resources and in assessingevaluate performance. The Company's CODM is considered to be the Company's chief executive officer ("CEO"(“CEO”). The CEO reviews financial information presented on an entity level basis for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. Therefore, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating and reportable segment.
 
NOTE 1716 – SHARES POTENTIALLY SUBJECT TO RESCISSION RIGHTS
 
On July 14, 2010, the Company filed audited financial statements on Form 10-K for the FYEyear ended March 31, 2010, that included a qualified opinion from the Company's auditors pending completion of their audit procedures in respect of the deconsolidation of one of the Company's subsidiaries.  The Company subsequently filed an amended Form 10-K, which includes an unqualified audit opinion.
 
On January 19, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")SEC notified the Company that the initial financial statements filed on July 14, 2010 did not comply with the requirements of Rule 2-02 under Regulation S-X for audited financial statements because the financial statements contained a qualified opinion. As noted above, the amended Form 10-K filed on January 28, 2011 contains audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion that comply with Rule 2-02.  The Commission hasSEC indicated that as the initial Form 10-K filed on July 14, 2010 was deficient as a result of the inclusion of the qualified audit opinion.  It was therefore deemed not to have been filed with the CommissionSEC in accordance with applicable requirements, thus making the Company delinquent in its filings with the Commission.SEC.
 
The Commission hasSEC informed the Company that as a result of the deemed failure to timely file a Form 10-K, it is the SEC Staff's view that as of July 14, 2010 the Company ceased to be eligible to use SEC Form S-3 for the registration of the Company's securities.  As the financial statements included in the original Form 10-K were also included in a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-163867) pursuant to which the Company offered its common stock and warrants to purchase common stock in December 2010 (the "December“December 2010 Offering"Offering”), the CommissionSEC has also indicated that such registration statement failed to comply with the requirements of Form S-1 due to the lack of the inclusion of unqualified audited financial statements in compliance with CommissionSEC requirements.
 
19

Since the Commission has informed the Company that it is the Commission'sIn view that as of July 14, 2010 the Company ceased to be eligible to use Form S-3 for the registration of the Company's securities,foregoing, it is possible that any sales of the Company's securities pursuant to the Company's registration statements on Form S-3 since July 14, 2010 may be deemed to be unregistered sales of its securities.  Since July 14, 2010, the Company has sold an aggregate of 2,189,6602,292,760 shares of its common stock for an aggregate gross price of $1,640,004$1,690,866 pursuant to an at-the-market offering ("ATM"(“ATM”) of its common stock on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160993) in sales that occurred between September 7, 2010 and January 18,19, 2011.  In addition, the Company may be deemed to have made unregistered sales of the 2,575,830 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 858,610 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.90 per share sold for an aggregate gross purchase price of $1,545,498 sold pursuant to such registration statement with respect to the December 2010 Offering. Alternatively, to the extent that the sales are deemed be registered as a result of being sold pursuant to registration statements declared effective by the SEC as the registration statements in question either incorporated, in the case of the Form S-3 or included, in the case of the Form S-1, a qualified audit report the registration statements could be deemed to be materially incomplete.
21

 
If it is determined that persons who purchased the Company's securities after July 14, 2010 purchased securities in an offering deemed to be unregistered, or that the registration statements for such offerings were incomplete or inaccurate then such persons may be entitled to rescission rights. In addition, the sale of unregistered securities could subject the Company to enforcement actions or penalties and fines by federal or state regulatory authorities.  We areThe Company is unable to predict the likelihood of any claims or actions being brought against the Company related to these events, and there is a risk that theyany may have a material adverse effect on us.
 
The exercise of any applicable rescission rights is not within the control of the Company.  At December 31, 2010,As of June 30, 2011, the Company had approximately 3,307,8304,868,590 shares that may be subject to the rescission rights outside stockholders’ equity.  These shares have always been treated as outstanding for financial reporting purposes.

NOTE 17 –INVESTMENTS – OTHERS

Investments – others for each of the periods ended June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 consist of the following:

  All amounts in USD except share data 
  As of 
  June 30, 2011  March 31, 2011 
       
Investment in equity shares of an unlisted company
  
67,280
   
67,355
 
Investment in partnership (SIIPL-IGC)
  
845,818
   
810,508
 
   
913,098
   
877,863
 

NOTE 18 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS– OTHER INCOME
The Company is in
Other income for the process of finalizing agreements with the Steven M. Oliveira 1998 Charitable Remainder Unitrust (‘Oliveira’) and Bricoleur Partners, L.P. (‘Bricoleur’) to exchange the promissory note issued to Oliveira on October 5, 2009 (the “New Oliveira Note”) and the promissory note issued to Bricoleur on October 16, 2009 (the “Bricoleur Note”) respectively for new promissory notes with later maturity dates. However, there are no binding agreements in place at this point.  The Company anticipates that the 2011 Oliveira Note will be due on November 5, 2011, will bear interest at a rate of 30% per annum and will provide for monthly payments of principal and interest.  The Company also anticipates that the 2011 Bricoleur Note will be due onthree months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 consist primarily of the income relating to the translation of the foreign currency denominated balances primarily consisting of inter-company receivable due to the parent company.

NOTE 19 - IMPAIRMENT

For the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company conducted an impairment test on the investment in Sricon. Effective October 1, 2009, the Company diluted its investment in Sricon from 63% to 22%. Post dilution, the Company continued to account for the investment in Sricon based on the equity method of accounting. However, the Company entered into a management dispute with no prior payments due and willSricon after the Company was not bear interest.able to obtain the financial statements of Sricon after March 31, 2010. The Company also anticipateshas conducted the impairment test based on the information available with it and the recoverable value of assets that it will issue additional shares of its common stockcan ascertain. Based on such an impairment test, the Company has concluded that the investment in Sricon needs to both Oliveirabe impaired by $2,184,599. There have been no further indicators for impairment in the current quarter and Bricoleur in connection withaccordingly, the exchange ofCompany has not conducted an impairment test for the New Oliveira Note and the Bricoleur Note. The terms of the New Oliveira Note and the Bricoleur Note are described in Note 8 - Notes Payable.three months ended June 30, 2011.
 
 
2022


NOTE 20 – RECONCILIATION OF EPS
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the basic shares include: founders shares, shares sold in the market, shares sold in a private placement, shares sold in the IPO, shares sold in the registered direct, shares arising from the exercise of warrants issued in the placement of debt, and shares issued in connection with debt and shares issued to employees, directors and vendors.   The fully diluted shares include the basic shares plus warrants issued as part of the units sold in the private placement and IPO, warrants sold as part of the units sold in the registered direct, and employee options.   The UPO issued to the underwriters (1,500,000 shares) is not considered as the strike price for the UPO is “out of the money” at $6.50 per share.  The historical weighted average per share, for our shares, through June 30, 2011, was applied using the treasury method of calculating the fully diluted shares.  The weighted average number of shares outstanding as at June 30, 2011 used for the computation of basic EPS is 20,359,602. Owing to the loss incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2011, all of the potential equity shares are anti-dilutive and accordingly, the diluted EPS is equal to the basic EPS.

NOTE 21 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In August 2011, the Company entered into a strategic partnership agreement with H&F Ironman Limited (‘H&F’) in connection with a share exchange. The strategic partnership agreement also envisages supply of iron ore sourced from India to Chinese steel mills for serving the customers of H&F in China. It also requires H&F to purchase common stock of the Company and the Company to buy common stock for the same value in H&F.
23


Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the amended Annual Report filed on Form 10-K on January 28,July 14, 2011.  In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as in our amended Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on January 28,July 14, 2011, incl udingincluding the risk factors set out in Item 1A therein. Therefore, the Financial Statementsfinancial statements included in the Report should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20102011 filed with the SEC on January 28,July 14, 2011.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the Financial Statements. The results for interim periods do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year.  The Company’s 2011 Form 10-K filed on July 14, 2011 restates the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and consolidated cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2010, amend its management discussion and analysis as it relates to the year ended March 31, 2010, and restates its unaudited quarterly financial date for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.  As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2011, the Company’s management, in consultation with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended, as amended and in the quarterly Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 should no longer be relied upon.

Explanatory Note

Overview of Restatement

In the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 filed on July 14, 2011, the Company:

a)  Restated its consolidated statements of operations and consolidated cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2010;
b)  Amended its management discussion and analysis as it relates to the year ended March 31, 2010; and
c)  Restated its unaudited quarterly financial data for the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Background of the restatement:

As previously disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 15, 2011, the Company’s management, in consultation with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2010 (the “2010 Annual Financial Statements”) included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended, as amended (the “2010 Annual Report”) and in the quarterly Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 should no longer be relied upon.

The changes described above were non-cash items and did not impact the Company’s operations.

The financial statements were restated to reflect:

i.  A Reclassification in the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows:  Sricon India Private Limited (SIPL), a subsidiary of IGC Inc., had been deconsolidated effective October 1, 2009. Upon deconsolidation, the cash flows of SIPL for the six months ended September 30, 2009 were re-classified and presented as equity in earnings of affiliates. The cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2010 have now been restated to contain transactions relating to SIPL up until the date of deconsolidation; and
 
24


ii.  Computation of diluted earnings per share: The effect of dilution was inadvertently considered while computing the Earnings Per Share (EPS) although there was a loss by IGC Inc. The restatement now rightly shows the EPS taking into consideration the loss.

Effects of Restatement

The restated items are non-cash and do not impact the Company’s operations.

The previously filed Annual Reports for the period ended March 31, 2010 filed on Form 10-K and quarterly report for the period ended December 31, 2009 filed on Form 10-Q were affected by the restatement and have not been amended. Instead, the amended statements are presented in the Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2011 filed on July 14, 2011.  Accordingly, investors should no longer rely upon the Company’s previously released financial statements for these periods and any earnings releases or other previous communications relating to these periods.

Overview
 
In response to the increased demand for infrastructure in India and China, our focus is to supply construction materials in India and to China as well as execute infrastructure projects.  We do this primarilyentirely through our subsidiaries. We supply construction materials such as iron ore and rock aggregate we constructto the construction industry. We build interstate highways, rural roads, and we execute civil works in high temperature cement and steel plants.  We own and operate rock aggregate quarries, wequarries. We are pursuing joint venture partnerships with mine owners and we have applied for licenses to mine iron ore in India.  We have customers in India and China and we are exploring other regional opportunities. We also actively continue to pursue joint venture partnerships with mine owners for acquisition of mines and mining rights.
 
Company Overview
 
We are a materials and construction company offering a suite of services including: 1) the export of iron ore to China and supply of ore to the Indian markets, 2) operations and supply of rock aggregate, and 3) the civil construction of roads and highways.   Our present and past clients include various Indian government organizations and steel mills in China.   Including our subsidiaries, we have approximately 150130 employees and contractors. We are focused building out rock aggregate quarries, setting up relations and export hubs for the export of iron ore to China and winning construction contracts.

On January 26, 2010 Minister Kamal Nath, India’s Minister for Road Transport and Highways, told the Wall Street Journal that he plans to build 20 kilometers of road every day and raise $41 billion in private sector investment in the next three to four years.   This build out of infrastructure in India, we believe, will create a substantial demand for rock aggregate.  In addition, according to Standard and Poor’s, China’s steel production in 2009 increased 13.4% from 2008 and is expected to increase by 21% in 2010. We believe that these trends will continue to be favorable to our business.

Our business model is as follows:
 
1.We supply iron ore to China.China and trade in steel in the Indian markets.
 
2.We supply rock aggregate to the construction industry in India and trade in other construction materials in the Indian markets, and
 
3.We bid and execute construction and engineering contracts.
 
Our expansion plans include building out 10 rock aggregate quarries to create a one-stop shop for rock aggregate (a business currently not prevalent in India),; obtaining licenses for the mining of iron ore in India in order to fill customer orders from China,China; and winning and executing construction contracts. There is seasonality in our business as outdoor construction activity slows down during the Indian monsoons.  The heavy rains typically continue intermittently from June through September.
 
 
2125

 Industry Overview
The CIA 2010 World Fact Book estimated the Indian GDP to be approximately $1.1 trillion in 2009.  According to the World Bank, only fourteen economies including India, Mexico and Australia generated more than $1 Trillion in GDP in 2008. According to the CIA 2010 World Fact Book, India’s growth rates ranged from 6.2% to 9.6% for the past few years.   The current global financial crisis created a liquidity crunch starting in October 2008, which has partially abated. The Financial Times noted that a recent Economic Survey of India projected growth at 8.5% in 2010 and 9% in 2011, second only to that of China.
India’s GDP growth for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 was estimated to be about the same as 2009’s GDP growth rate.  The stagnant GDP growth rate was caused by the global financial crisis. However, it does indicate that India has withstood the global downturn better than many nations. The factors contributing to maintaining the relatively high growth included growth in the agriculture and service industries, favorable demographic dynamics (India has a large youth population that exceeds 550 million), the savings rate, and the spending habits of the Indian middle class. Other factors that led to growth include: changing investment patterns, increasing consumerism, healthy business confidence, inflows of foreign investment (India ranks #3 in the A.T. Kearney “FDI Confidence Index” for 2010), and i mprovements in the Indian banking system.
To sustain India’s fast growing economy, infrastructure investment in India is expected to increase to 9 percent of GDP by 2014, up from 5 percent in 2006-07.  This forecast is based on The Indian Planning Commission’s statement in its annual publication that for the Eleventh Plan period (2007-12), a large investment of approximately $494 billion is required for Infrastructure build-out and modernization.  This industry is one of the largest employers in the country. The construction industry alone employs more than 30 million people.  According to the Business Monitor International (BMI), by 2012, the construction industry’s contribution to India’s GDP is forecasted to be 16.98%.
This ambitious infrastructure development mandate by the Indian Government will require funding.  The Government of India has already raised funds from multi-lateral agencies such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. The India Infrastructure Company was set up to support projects by guaranteeing up to $2.0 billion annually.  In addition, the Indian government has identified public-private partnerships (PPP) as the cornerstone of its infrastructure development policy.  The Indian government is also proactively seeking additional FDI and approval is not required for up to 100% of FDI in most infrastructure areas.  According to Indian Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, India needs $1 trillion in Infrastructure spending between fiscal years 2011/2012 and 2016/2017.
The Indian government is also permitting External Commercial Borrowings (ECB’s) as a source of financing Indian companies looking to expand existing capacity and incubation for new startups.   ECB’s  include commercial bank loans, buyers' credit, suppliers' credit, securitized instruments such as floating rate notes and fixed rate bonds, credit from official export credit agencies, and commercial borrowings from private sector multilateral financial institutions such as the International Finance Corporation (Washington, DC), ADB, AFIC, CDC, etc.  National credit policies seek to keep an annual cap or ceiling on access to ECB, consistent with prudent debt management.   These policies encourage a greater emphasis on infrastructure projects in core sectors such as power, oil ex ploration, telecom, railways, roads and bridges, ports, industrial parks, urban infrastructure, and exporting.

Our operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including among others, dependency on the Indian and Asian economy and government policies, competitively priced raw materials, dependence upon key members of the management team, and increased competition from existing and new entrants.  See the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our amended Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of certain of these risks.
Core Business Competencies

As the infrastructure in India is built out and modernized, the demand for basic raw materials like stone aggregate and iron ore (steel) is expected to increase. We offer an integrated set of services to our customers based upon several core competencies. This integrated approach provides us with an advantage over our competitors.  Our core business competencies are:
 
1. A sophisticated, integrated approach to project modeling, costing, management, and monitoring.
2. In-depth knowledge of southern and central Indian infrastructure development.
3. Knowledge of low cost logistics for moving commodities across long distances in specific parts of India.
4. In-depth knowledge of the licensing process for mines and quarries in southern and central India.
5. Strong relationships with several important construction companies and mine operators in southern and central India.
 
22


Our core business areas include the following:are:

1.           Mining and trading.  Our mining and trading activity currently centers on the export of iron ore to China and the resale of iron ore to traders in India. India is the fourth largest producer of iron ore.   The Freedonia Group projected in May 2010 that China’s $1.15 trillion construction industry would grow 9.1% every year until 2014. This growth will increase China’s already large demand for steel. China, which accounted for 648 million metric tons of steel production in 2010, is expected to produce between 690 million and 710 million metric tons in 2011. As The Wall Street Journal reported, this production is expected to be almost half of total global output. We believe that IGC is well positioned to provide some Chinese steel mills with the iron ore needed to meet their demand.  Our subsidiary IGC Mining and Trading Private Limited (IGC-IMT), based in Chennai, India, is engaged in the iron ore business.  The subsidiary has relationships and in some cases agreements with mine owners in Orissa and Karnataka, two of the largest ore mining belts in India. In addition, it operates facilities at seaports on the west coast of India and to a lesser extent on the east coast of India.  The facilities consist of an office and a plot of land within the port to store iron ore. Our staff is experienced in delivering and managing the logistics of ore transport. Our subsidiary services a customer in China by buying ore from Indian mine owners, transporting it to seaports and then subcontracting stevedores to load the ships. Our share of the export market for iron ore is less than 1%.
2.           Quarrying rock aggregate.  As Indian infrastructure modernizes, the demand for raw materials like rock aggregate, iron ore and similar resources is projected to greatly increase. In 2009, according to the Freedonia Group, India was the third largest stone aggregate market in the world. The report projected that Indian demand for crushed stone will increase to 770 million metric tons in 2013 and 1.08 billion metric tons in 2018. Our subsidiary, IGC Materials Private Limited (“IGC-MPL”), is responsible for our rock aggregate production. The subsidiary currently has two quarrying agreements with two separate partners. The two quarries mined near Nagpur, a city in the state of Maharashtra, India, have approximately 10-11 million metric tons of rock aggregate or about $40,000,000 of reserves at current prices. With the production of these two quarries, our subsidiary is one of the largest suppliers in the immediate area. Our share of the overall market in India is currently less than 1%. However, IGC-MPL has a growing regional presence in the Nagpur area.

All quarrying or mining activities in India require a license. IGC and its subsidiaries do not directly hold any mining or quarrying licenses and therefore there are no licenses or expenses in connection with acquiring the same being reflected in the consolidated financial statements. However, Sricon holds licenses and we quarry under licenses held by our partners. For all quarries, the licenses are granted for two years. The licenses are automatically renewed for additional periods of two years, provided that all royalty payments and taxes to the Indian government are paid up to date. IGC-MPL has applied, on its own, for licenses for mining and quarrying. The process of obtaining a quarrying license is difficult and typically takes between 12-18 months. The process involves a competitive application process. As such, while we have applied for licenses, there is no assurance that we will be granted these licenses. IGC-MPL is also in active negotiations with other land and license owners to expand the number of producing quarries available to it.  

3.           Highway and heavy construction.

construction.  The Indian government has developed a plan to build and modernize Indian infrastructure.  The Wall Street Journal reported on March 23, 2010 that the government plans to double infrastructure spending from $500 billion to $1 trillion.  It will pay for the expansion and construction of rural roads, major highways, airports, seaports, freight corridors, railroads and townships.  A significant number of our customers are engaged in highway and heavy construction.

Mining  Our subsidiary Techni Bharathi Limited (“TBL”), a small road building company, is engaged in highway and quarrying.

Asheavy construction activities.  TBL has constructed highways, rural roads, tunnels, dams, airport runways, and housing complexes, mostly in southern states.  TBL, because of its successful execution of contracts, is pre-qualified by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and other agencies. TBL’s share of the overall Indian infrastructure modernizes,construction market is very small. However, TBL’s prequalification and prior track record provides a way to grow the demand for raw materials like stone aggregate, coal, oreCompany in highway and similar resourcesheavy construction.  Currently, TBL is projected to greatly increase. In 2009, according toengaged in the Freedonia Group, India wasrecovery of construction delay claims that it is pursuing against NHAI, the third largest stone aggregateAirport Authority of Cochin, and the Orissa State Works. Our share of the overall market in the world. The report projected that Indian demand for crushed stone would increase to 770 million metric tons in 2013 and 1.08 billion metric tons in 2018. We are in the processIndia is significantly less than 1%.
26

 
Our mining and trading activity centers on the export of iron ore to China. According to International Business Times, August 6, 2010, India is the third largest producer of iron ore producing around 277 million metric tons of ore behind Brazil and Australia.  The Freedonia Group projected in May 2010 that China’s $1.15 trillion construction industry will grow 9.1% every year until 2014. This growth will increase China’s already large demand for steel. China is expected to produce 600 million metric tons of steel in 2010, which, as the Wall Street Journal reported, is expected to be almost half of total global output. With our processes, infrastructure and skilled people, we believe, that IGC, is well positioned to supply Chinese steel mills with iro n ore.  While, we have several customers in China and in India that have approached us, completed due diligence and signed supply contracts for iron ore we have been unable to supply ore in large quantities because the government of Karnataka has banned exports of iron ore from several of the major ports where we operate.  The ban was imposed by the Government to give it time to put in processes that would curb illegal mining.  It is expected, based on court hearings, that the ports may reopen in April of 2011.  In the meantime we are revisiting our customers to work out supply schedules and funding mechanisms to fund the expected increase in working capital.
4.           Construction and maintenance of high temperature plants.

We have an expertise  Through our unconsolidated, minority interest in Sricon Infrastructure Private Limited (Sricon), we engage in the civil engineering, construction and maintenance of high temperature plants. We haveSricon also has the specialized skills required to build and maintain high temperature chimneys and kilns. Sricon’s share of this market in India is less than 1%. We currently hold equity in Sricon.  According to the global market researcher eMpulse, the construction industry’s total market size in India is approximately $53 Billion. According to Reuters, India exports about 100 million tons of iron ore per year. Prices for iron ore have averaged around $140 per metric ton. The rock aggregate market is India is approximately $3 billion. As noted above, Sricon’s share of these markets is less than 1%.

The following table sets out the revenue contribution from our subsidiaries:

Subsidiary 
Three months ended
June 30, 2011
  
Three months ended
June 30, 2010
 
TBL  1%  88%
IGC-IMT  70%  -%
IGC-MPL  29%  10%
IGC-LPL  -%  2%
Total  100%  100%

Customers.

Our pastpresent and presentpast customers include the National Highway Authority of India, several state highwayhigh way authorities, the Indian railways, private construction companies in India, and several steel mills in China.  In April 2010 we received a $160,000,000 contract for supplying iron ore over five years to Jiya International, a large Chinese steel mill.  This was followed by a $35,000,000 contract to supply ore to Tangshan Danyang Enterprises, another large customer in China.  We currently have a backlog of approximately $200,000,000 for the supply of iron ore to China. We have several customers to whom we supply rock aggregate in India. These customers include road builders, new power plants and general construction contractors.

Construction contract bidding process.

In order to create transparency, the Indian government has centralized the contract awarding process for building inter-stateinterstate roads.  The new process is as follows: At the “federal” level, NHAI publishes a Statement of Work for an interstate highway construction project.  The Statement of Work has a detailed description of the work to be performed, as well as, the completion time frame. The bidder prepares two proposals in response to the Statement of Work. The first proposal demonstrates technical capabilities, prior work experience, specialized machinery, manpower required, and other qualifications required to complete the project.  The second proposal includes a financial bid.  NHAI evaluates the technical bids and short-lists technically qualified companies. Next, the short list of technical lytechnically qualified companies are invited to place a detailed financial bid and show adequate financial strength in terms of  revenue, net worth, credit lines,  and balance sheets.  Generally, the lowest bid wins the contract. Additionally, contract bidders must meet several requirements to demonstrate an adequate level of capital reserves:  
1)             An earnest money deposit between 2% to 10% of project costs,
2)             aA performance guarantee of between 5% and 10%,
3)             anAn adequate overall working capital, and
4)             additionalAdditional capital available for plant and machinery.   
Bidding qualifications for larger NHAI projects are set by NHAI and are imposed on each contractor.  As the contractor actually executes larger highway projects, then the contractor may qualify for even larger projects.
     
 
2327


Growth strategy and business model.

Our growth strategy and business model are to:

·1)  Deepen our relationships with our existing construction customers by providing them infrastructure materials such aslike iron ore, rock aggregate, concrete, coal and associated logistical support.
·2)  Expand our materials offering by expanding the number of rock aggregate quarries and other materials.
·3)  Leverage our expertise in the logistics and supply of iron ore by increasing the number of shipping hubs we operate from and continue to expand our offering into China and other Asian countries in order to take advantage of their expected strong infrastructure growth.
·4)  Expand the number of recurring contracts for infrastructure build-out to customers that can benefit from our portfolio of offerings.
 
Competition.
 
We operate in an industry that is competitive.  However, the industry is fragmented and while a number of our competitors are well qualified and better financed than we are, we believe that the demand for contractors in general will permit us to compete for projects and contracts that are appropriate for our size and capabilities.  Large domestic and international firms compete for jumbo contracts over $250 million in size, while locally based contractors vie for contracts worth less than $5 million. We seek to compete in the gap between these two ends of the competitive spectrum. The recent capital markets crisis has made it more difficult for smaller companies to grow to mid-sized companies because their access to capital has been restrained. While we are also constrained by capital, we believe that we are in a bet terbetter position to secure capital than a number of small, purely local competitors. Our construction business is positioned in the $5 million to $50 million contract range, above locally based contractors and below the large firms, creating a distinct technical and financial advantage in this market niche assuming that we can maintain access to capital.  Rock aggregate is generally supplied to the industry through small crushing units, which supply low quality material.  Frequently, high quality aggregate is unavailable, or is transported over large distances. We fill this gap by providing high quality material in large quantities.  We compete on price, quantity and quality.  Iron ore is produced in India, where our core assets are located, and exported to China.  While this is a fairly established and relatively efficient market, we compete by aggregating ore from smaller suppliers who do not have direct access to customers in China.  Further, we expe ctexpect to install a large iron ore crusher that can grind ore pebbles into fine ore particles, providing a value added service to the smaller mine owners.
 
Seasonality.

The road building and construction industries typically experience naturally recurring seasonal patterns throughout India.  The Northeast monsoons historically arrive on June 1 annually, followed by the Southwestsouthwest monsoons, which usually continue intermittently until September.  Historically, the road building business in the monsoon months is slower than in other months because of the heavy rains.  Activities such as engineering and maintenance of high temperature plants are less susceptible to weather delays, while the iron ore export business slows down somewhat due to the rough seas.  Flooding in the quarries can slow production in the stone aggregate industry during the monsoon season. However, our quarries build stone reserves prior to the monsoon season.  The monsoon season has historically been used to bid and win contracts for construction and for the supply of ore and aggregate in preparation for work activity when the rains abate.

Employees and consultants.
 
As of December 31, 2010,June 30, 2011, we employed a work force of approximately 150130 employees and contract workers worldwide.  Employees are typically skilled workers including executives, welders, drivers, and other specialized experts. Contract workers require less specialized skills. We make diligent efforts to comply with all employment and labor regulations, including immigration laws in the many jurisdictions in which we operate.  In order to attract and retain skilled employees, we have implemented a performance based incentive program, offered career development programs, improved working conditions, and provided United States work assignments, technology training, and other fringe benefits. We hope that our efforts will make our companies more attractive.
 
 
2428

 
Environmental regulations.

India has strict environmental, occupational, health and safety regulations.  In most instances, the contracting agency regulates and enforces all regulatory requirements.   We internally monitor and manage regulatory issues on a continuous basis. We believe that we are in compliance with all the regulatory requirements of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Furthermore, we do not believe that compliance will have a material adverse effect on our business activities.

Current Chinese currency revaluation.

Bloomberg News reported on December 21, 2010 that U.S. senators are strongly encouraging China to hold up to their promise to re-institute a “managed floating exchange rate.”  Also, they reportedChina may continue to institute a managed floating exchange rate regime that is tied to a basket of foreign currencies for the yuannext eight or nine years, the China Securities Journal announced August 4, 2011.  However, the RMB (the official currency of the People's Republic of China) is unlikely to be floated freely in the near term as the country's economy faces internal difficulties during its reform drive and external uncertainties of the global economy according to experts.  Generally, the RMB is the best performer of the BRIC countries and has appreciated 24% to the dollar in the past decade. If a similar appreciation occurs, it will increase the purchasing power of Chinese steel mills buying iron ore, which is traded in USD.US dollars.  Chinese firms could buy more ore, even at a higher price, and IGC would benefit from an appreciation of the yuan.RMB.
 
Information and timely financial reporting.
 
Our operations are located in India where the accepted accounting standard is the Indian GAAP, which, in many cases, is not congruent with the USGAAP.U.S. GAAP.  Indian accounting standards are evolving toward IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards).  We engage an independent public accounting firm registered with the U.S. PCAOB to conduct an annual audit of our financial statements.  The process of producing financial statements is at times cumbersome and places significant demands upon our existing staff.  We believe we are still six to twelve monthssome time away from having processes and adequately trained personnel in place to meet the reporting timetables set out by U.S. reporting requirements. Until then we may, on occasion, have to file for extensions to meet U.S. reporting timetables and it is possible that we may fa ilfail to meet these time tables.  Failure to file our reports in a timely fashion can result in severe consequences including the potential delisting of our securities.  In addition, our access to capital may become more difficult or limited if we fail to meet reporting deadlines.  We will make our annual reports, quarterly reports, proxy statements, and up-to-date investor presentations available on our Web site,website, www.indiaglobalcap.com, as soon as they are available.  Our SEC filings are also available, free of charge, at www.sec.gov.
 
Foreign Currency Translation
IGC mainly operates in India and a substantial portion of the Company’s sales are denominated in the Indian rupee.   As a result, changes in the relative values of the U.S. dollar and Indian rupee affect revenues and profits as the results are translated into U.S. dollars in the consolidated and pro forma financial statements.
The accompanying financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars. The Indian rupee is the functional currency for the company. The translation of the functional currencies into U.S. dollars is performed for assets and liabilities using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenues, costs and expenses using average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting periods. Adjustments resulting from the translation of functional currency financial statements to reporting currency are accumulated and reported as other comprehensive income/(loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
The exchange rates used for translation purposes are as follows:

PeriodMonth End Average Rate (P&L rate)Year End Rate (Balance sheet rate)
Nine months ended December 31, 2009INR 48.64 per USDINR 46.40 per USD
Year ended March 31, 2010INR 47.91 per USDINR 44.95 per USD
Nine months ended December 31, 2010INR  44.95 per USDINR  44.80 per USD
25


Revenue Recognition
The majority of the revenue recognized for the nine month period ended December 31, 2010 was derived from the Company’s subsidiaries and as accordingly:

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. In Government contracting we recognize revenue when a Government consultant verifies and certifies an invoice for payment.
Revenue from sale of goods is recognized when substantial risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the buyer under the terms of the contract.
Revenue from construction/project related activity and contracts for supply/commissioning of complex plant and equipment is recognized as follows:
a)Cost plus contracts: Contract revenue is determined by adding the aggregate cost plus proportionate margin as agreed with the customer and expected to be realized.
b)Fixed price contracts: Contract revenue is recognized using the percentage completion method. Percentage of completion is determined as a proportion of cost incurred-to-date to the total estimated contract cost. Changes in estimates for revenues, costs to complete and profit margins are recognized in the period in which they are reasonably determinable
Full provision is made for any loss in the period in which it is foreseen.
Revenue from property development activity is recognized when all significant risks and rewards of ownership in the land and/or building are transferred to the customer and a reasonable expectation of collection of the sale consideration from the customer exists.
Revenue from service related activities and miscellaneous other contracts are recognized when the service is rendered using the proportionate completion method or completed service contract method.

Goodwill
We account for goodwill in accordance with provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Others”, (previously referred to as SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", which sets forth the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. ASC 350 requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be allocated to the reporting unit level, which the Group defines as each circle.
ASC 350 also prohibits the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets upon adoption, but requires that they be tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently as warranted, at the reporting unit level.
The goodwill impairment test under ASC 350 is performed in two phases. The first step of the impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered impaired, and step two of the impairment test must be performed. The second step of the impairment test quantifies the amount of the impairment loss by comparing the carrying amount of goodwill to the implied fair value. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

During the fourth quarter of year ending March 31, 2010, we completed the required annual test, which indicated there was no impairment since the fair value of the reporting unit was substantially in excess of its carrying value.
26

Income Taxes
Deferred income tax is provided for the difference between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  The Company expects to realize sufficient earnings and profits to utilize deferred tax assets as it begins invoicing its subsidiaries for services and establishes iron ore sales contracts with customers in China and other countries.   Recently, the Company reported contracts for the supply of around $200 million of iron ore to customers in China which further supports this position. However since there has been a delay in the supply relating to the above agreement, owing to some regulatory restrictions, the Company believes that the it would be prude nt to create a valuation allowance for the losses of the current quarter, We continue to believe that there will be sufficient profits generated over the future periods to utilize completely the tax assets recognized as at December 31, 2010.

Results of Operations
 
Three Months Ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2009June 30, 2010
 
Revenue - Total revenue was $ 484$1,060 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2010,June 30, 2011, as compared to $ 5,909$1,128 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2009.June 30, 2010.  The decline in revenueprimary reasons for the three months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009 is primarily due to certain regulatory restrictions relating to exportdecrease in revenues of iron ore out of India which prevented us from fulfilling our iron ore export contracts.$68 thousand include:

  ●
Decline in revenue from the infrastructure business of $976 thousand primarily due to certain contract claims that were awarded in the three months ended June 30, 2010, which were recognized as revenue. No such contract claims were awarded in the current quarter.
  ●
The above decline is offset by an increase in revenue amounting to $738 thousand from the iron ore trading and mining business that started producing operational results only after June 30, 2010. Accordingly, while there is revenue reflected against this business in the current quarter, there is no corresponding revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
  ●
The decline is further offset due to an increase in revenue from the trading related to rock aggregate and other construction materials amounting to $170 thousand.
Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation) -Cost of revenue is exclusive of depreciation and amortization. Cost of revenue consists primarily of compensation and related fringe benefits for project-related personnel, department management and all other dedicated project related costs and indirect costs.  It also includes the cost associated with buying raw materials.materials for the two primary revenue generating activities of the Company during the current quarter – trading of iron ore and rock aggregates.  Cost of revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 was $ 457$974 thousand as compared to $ 5,326$983 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2009.  The decrease inJune 30, 2010.  
29


Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue has increased from 87.15% for the three months ended December 31,June 30, 2010 is in line withto 91.89% for the decreasecurrent quarter. This increase was primarily due to the decline in revenue forfrom the comparable period.infrastructure business, which historically contributes higher margins as compared to the trading business (of both iron ore and rock aggregate).

Selling, General and Administrative - Selling, general and administrative expenses were $ 1,055$733 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 compared to $ 3,050$581 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2009.June 30, 2010.  The decreaseincrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in absolute termsfor the current quarter is attributable primarily to the decline in revenue althoughcompensation cost arising from the issue of stock options to the directors and employees of the Company continues to incur these expenses on setting up proper infrastructure for administration and other support functions to take advantage of the expected spurt in the mineral trading business.
Operating Income (loss) - Induring the three months ended December 31, 2010, operating lossJune 30, 2011. These stock options were fully vested on the date of grant and therefore we have accounted for the entire compensation cost of $235 thousand arising out of the grant of these stock options in the current quarter. No such grants were made in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Other selling, general and administrative expenses include travel, rent, consultancy charges, insurance and legal and professional fees. These have declined by $83 thousand primarily due to the reduction in insurance charges and consultancy fees during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Depreciation – The depreciation expense was $ 1,490$51 thousand in the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $96 thousand in the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Interest and other financial expense – The interest expense and other financial expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $301 thousand compared to an operating loss of $ 2,569$393 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2009.  The operating loss in the three months ended December 31, 2010, stem partly due to a decrease in revenue and largely due to increased costs incurred during the initial phases of the quarry. We expect operating income to increase as our revenue ramps up and our quarries become operational.

Early extinguishment of debt, interest expense, and amortization of debt discount –June 30, 2010.  The interest expense and loss on extinguishment of debt for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $ 308 thousand comparedtwo periods primarily relates to $ 431 thousand ofthe interest and amortization of debt discount forrecorded on the three months ended December 31, 2009.  The interest expense are for approximately USD 5,536 thousand of short and long term debt made availablethat has been taken by the parent company. Most of the interest expense continues to the Company.  The annual effective rate of interest is 34%, albeit much of itbe non-cash. If the Company raises additional equity capital and pays off some ofuses the loans, it can potentially save around $ 400 thousand per quarter, or $ 1,600 thousandproceeds to repay the existing long term debt, we expect a year, which would increase our bottom line substantially.significant reduction in this interest expense. However, there is currently no guarantee that the Company will be successful in doingwould do so.

Income tax benefit/(expense) – For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company has not recorded any income tax benefit or expense. The provision for income taxesCompany continues to incur losses on its operations, which have resulted in taxable losses. Therefore, in the absence of any taxable gain, the Company has not recorded an income tax expense. Further, given that the Company has significant carry forward losses, as a matter of prudence, the Company has created a full valuation allowance on all the deductible differences including carry forward losses. However, the Company continues to believe that these would be recoverable in the future. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a net income tax benefit of $ 20$422 thousand, which primarily related to the tax assets created for the carry forward losses incurred during the particular quarter.
Other income – Other income primarily consists of foreign exchange gain arising from the restatement of the inter-company receivables denominated in Indian rupees in relation to payables to the U.S. entity.

Share in profit of joint venture – For the three months period ended December 31, 2010 comparedJune 30, 2011, the Company has recorded an income amounting to benefit  of $ 10336 thousand forresulting from its share in the same periodjoint venture that is reflected as another investment in 2009.  As statedthe balance sheet. The joint venture primarily operates in our recently filed 10-K, a valuation allowancethe rock aggregate crushing and trading business. We are also entitled to an interest on the capital that is not taken because of $200 millioninvested in new contracts over 5 years commencing in fiscal year 2011.  We believe that newly acquired contracts will generate sufficient taxable incomethis joint venture. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we have earned interest amounting to utilize our tax assets recorded as of December 31, 2010. However since there$32 thousand, which has been a delayrecorded separately from the share in the supply relating to the above agreement, owing to some regulatory restrictions relating to export of iron ore out of India, the Company believes that the it would be prudent to create a valuation allowance for the losses of the current quarter, We continue to believe that there will be sufficient profits generated over the future periods to utilize completely the tax assets recognizedprofit as at December 31, 2010.
27


Consolidated Net Income (loss) – Consolidated Net lossinterest income. The joint venture operates one crusher and for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was $ 1,762 thousand compared to a consolidated net loss of $ 6,168 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2009.

Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and working capital – As on December 31, 2010 the company had $ 3,373 thousand of cash and cash equivalents including restricted cash.  Restricted cash is cash in a fixed deposit used to secure a bank guarantee.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $ 5,099 thousand as working capital.
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009

Revenue - TotalJune 30, 2011, has generated revenue was $ 3,294 thousand for the nine months ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $ 13,995 thousand for the nine months ended December 31, 2009.  The revenue reported in December 2010 does not include Sricon revenue, due to the deconsolidation of Sricon effective October 1, 2009.  The revenue reported in December 2009 however, includes revenue from Sricon for a period of six months ended September 30, 2009.  Eliminating the Sricon revenue in order to make these figures comparable, the decline in revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2009 is primarily due to certain regulatory restrictions relating to export of iron ore out of India.

Cost of Revenue - Cost of revenue consists primarily of compensation and related fringe benefits for project-related personnel, department management and all other dedicated project related costs and indirect costs.  It also includes the cost associated with buying raw materials.  Cost of revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 was $ 3,054 thousand compared to $ 11,829 thousand for the nine months ended December 31, 2009.  While the absolute decrease in the cost of revenue is due to the de-consolidation of Sricon effective October 1, 2009, as a percentage of revenue, the cost of revenue increased because the Company has contracts for rock aggregate and iron ore that it is filling before its quarries become fully operational.  60;This practice will continue till our quarries and ore mines are fully functional.  At that point, we will fill orders for infrastructure materials from a much-improved cost basis.   In the meantime our strategy is to gain market share, establish our brand, and expand the customer base.

Selling, General and Administrative - Selling, general and administrative expenses were $ 2,400 thousand for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 compared to $ 4,446 thousand for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses in absolute terms is attributable primarily to the decline in revenue although the Company continues to incur these expenses on setting up proper infrastructure for administration and other support functions to take advantage of the expected spurt in the mineral trading business.
Operating Income (loss) - In the nine months ended December 31, 2010, operating loss was $ 2,818 thousand compared to an operating loss of $ 2,801 thousand for the nine months ended December 31, 2009.  The operating loss in the nine months ended December 31, 2010, stem partly due to a decrease in revenue on account of de-consolidation of Sricon and largely due to increased costs incurred during the initial phases of the quarry. We expect to reduce our operating losses and eventually generate operating income to increase as our revenue ramps up and our quarries become operational.

Early extinguishment of debt, interest expense, and amortization of debt discount –The interest expense and amortization of debt discount for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 was $ 1,075 thousand as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2009 which was $ 1,198approximating $642 thousand.  The interest expense and amortization of debt discount are for approximately $5,536 thousand of short and long term debt made available to the Company.  The annual effective rate of interest is 34%, albeit much of it non-cash.  If the Company raises equity and pays off some of the loans, it can potentially save around $ 400 thousand per quarter, or $ 1,600 thousand a year, which would increase our bottom line substantially.

Income tax benefit/(expense) – The provision for income taxes resulted in a tax benefit of $ 475 thousand in the nine months period ended December 31, 2010 compared to tax expense of $ 54 thousand for the same period in 2009.  The decrease in income expense was primarily due to timing differences and tax attributes related to deferred interest expense, NOL’s and foreign tax credits. As stated in our recently filed 10-K, a valuation allowance is not taken because of $200 million in new contracts over 5 years commencing in fiscal year 2011.  We believe that newly acquired contracts will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize our tax assets recorded as of December 31, 2010.   Refer to our Note-19 Income Taxes to the audited finan cial statements contained in our amended Form 10-K for more details on utilization of tax assets. However since there has been a delay in the supply relating to the above agreement, owing to some regulatory restrictions relating to export of iron ore out of India, the Company believes that it would be prudent to create a valuation allowance for the losses of the current period. We continue to believe that there will be sufficient profits generated over the future periods to utilize completely the tax assets recognized as at December 31, 2010.

Consolidated Net Income (loss) – Consolidated net loss for the ninethree months ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 was $ 3,212$869 thousand compared to a consolidated net loss of $ 7,292$591 thousand for the ninethree months ended December 31, 2009.June 30, 2010.
 
28


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any investments in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
This liquidity and capital resources discussion compares the consolidated company resultsfinancial position for the nine monththree-month period ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 and 2009.2010.
30

 
Cash used for operating activities from continuing operations is our net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.  During the ninethree months ended December 31, 2010,June 30, 2011, cash used for operating activities was $ 2,207$425 thousand compared to cash used for operating activities of $ 2,764$744 thousand during the ninethree months ended December 31, 2009.June 30, 2010.  The uses of cash in the ninethree months ended December 31, 2010June 30, 2011 relate primarily to the payment of general operating expenses of our subsidiary companies.  The significant contributor to the decrease in this cash flow is the increase in accounts receivablesprepaid and other current assets and the repayment of certain trade creditors. Further, the losses from our operations have also contributed to this utilization of cash for our operations. This is however partially offset on account of increase in our trade payables.other current liabilities, which have also arisen in the normal course of business. While the Company continues to have favorable results in arbitrations, given the nature of the industry and owing to its lengthier operating cycle, the Company takes a relatively longer time to realize these receivables.
 
During the ninethree months ended December 31, 2010,June 30, 2011, investing activities from continuing operations provided $ 8$20 thousand of cash as compared to $ 985$66 thousand usedprovided during the comparablesame period in 2009.2010.  The inflow of cash was primarily due to release of restricted cash during the ninethree months partially offset by investments in joint ventures during the same period.mentioned above.
 
Financing cash flows from continuing operations generally consist primarily of transactions related to our debt and equity structure. DuringHowever, there have not been transactions that are to be classified as cash flows from financing activities in the ninethree months ended December 31, 2010 financing activities provided approximately $ 2,823 thousand, compared to cash provided of approximately $ 3,711 thousand during the comparable period in 2009.  The cash generated from financing activity during the current period is primarily on account of the sale of common stock in our at-the-market offering which did not generate significant sales in the nine months ended December 31, 2010 and the sale of common stock and warrants in December 2010.June 30, 2011.
 
To date, much of cash flow has come from raising additional capital. Our future liquidity needs will depend on, among other factors, stability of construction costs, interest rates, and a continued increase in infrastructure contracts in India.India. We believe that our current cash balances and anticipated operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund our normal operating requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, we may seek to secure additional capital or debt financing to fund further growth of our business or the repayment of existing debt, in the near term. Due to the risk factors referred to elsewhere in this report and described in detail in our amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010,2011, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising such additional capital on acceptable terms or at all.  Our ability to obtain additional capital will also depend on market conditions, national and global economies and other factors beyond our control.  We cannot be sure that we will be able to implement or capitalize on various financing alternatives.  The terms of any equity fundingor debt financing that we may obtain in the future may be unfavorable to us and to our current stockholders.
 
As further described in the risk factors set forth in Item 1A
Purchasers of this Form 10-Q, purchasers ofour common stock in our at-the-marketAt-The-Market offering after July 14, 2010 and the purchasers of our common stock and warrants in our December 2010 offering may have rescission rights with respect to such purchases. To the extent that such purchasers elect to exercise such rights and are ultimately successful in doing so, it would reduce the cash available for our operations.
 
Critical Accounting Policies

See Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 herein for a discussion of critical accounting policies.
29


Forward-Looking Statements
 
This report contains forward-looking statements within the definition of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, among others, (a) our expectations about possible business combinations, (b) our growth strategies, (c) our future financing plans, and (d) our anticipated needs for working capital. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “approximate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” or “project,” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. This information may involve known and u nknownunknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. These statements may be found in this report. Actual events or results may differ from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under our “Description of Business” and matters described in this report generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the events anticipated in the forward-looking statements may or may not occur. These statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.
 
31

The information contained in this report identifies important factors that could adversely affect actual results and performance. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
 
The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risks.  Market risk is the sensitivity of income to changes in interest rates, foreign exchanges, commodity prices, equity prices, and other market-driven rates or prices.  The disclosures are not meant to be precise indicators of expected future losses, but rather, indicators of reasonably possible losses.  This forward-looking information provides indicators of how we view and manage our ongoing market risk exposures.
 
Customer Risk
 
The Company’s customers are the Indian government, state government, private companies, Indian government owned companies and Chinese steel mills and iron ore traders.   Therefore, our business requires that we continue to maintain a pre-qualified status with our clients so we are not disqualified from bidding on future work.  The loss of a significant client may have an adverse effect on the Company.  Disqualification can occur if, for example, we run out of capital to finish contracts that we have undertaken.  The loss of a significant client may have an adverse effect on the Company.
 
Commodity Prices and Vendor Risk
 
The Company is affected by the availability, cost and quality of raw materials including cement, asphalt, steel, rock aggregate, iron ore and fuel.    The prices and supply of raw materials and fuel depend on factors beyond the control of the Company, including general economic conditions, competition, production levels, transportation costs and import duties.  The Company typically builds contingencies into itsthe contracts, including indexing key commodity prices into escalation clauses.  However, drastic changes in the global markets for raw materialmaterials and fuelfuels could affect our vendors, which may create disruptions in delivery schedules that could affect our ability to execute contracts in a timely manner.  We are taking steps to mitigate some of this risk by attempting to control the supply and quality of raw materials.    We do not currently hedge commodity prices on capital markets.
 
Labor Risk
 
The building boom in India and the Middle East (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh export labor to the Middle East) hashad created pressure on the availability of skilled labor like welders, equipment operators, etc.   This has recently changed somewhat with the shortage of financial liquidity and falling oil prices.  However, with the expected increase in infrastructure spending, we expect a shortage of skilled labor to be a prevalent condition.
30

labor.
 
Compliance, Legal and Operational Risks
 
We operate under regulatory and legal obligations imposed by the Indian governments, restrictions in China with respect to the import of iron oregovernment and U.S. securities regulators.  Those obligations relate, among other things, to the company’sCompany’s financial reporting, trading activities, capital requirements and the supervision of its employees.   For example, we file our financial statements in three countries under three different Generally Accepted Accounting Standards (GAAP).  Failure to fulfill legal or regulatory obligations can lead to fines, censure or disqualification of management and/or staff and other measures that could have negative consequences for our activities and financial performance. We are mitigating this risk by hiring local consultants and staff who can manage the compliance i nin the various jurisdictions in which we operate.  However, the cost of compliance in various jurisdictions could have ana negative impact on our future earnings.
32

 
Interest Rate Risk
 
The infrastructure development industry is one in which leverage plays a large role. A typical contract requires that we furnish an earnest money deposit, a performance guaranty, and the ability to discount letters of credit.  Furthermore, most construction contracts demand that we reserve between 7seven and 11eleven percent of contract value in the form of bank guaranties and/or deposits.  Finally, as interest rates rise, our cost of capital increases thus impacting our margins.
 
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
 
Our Indian subsidiaries conduct all business in Indian rupees with the exception of foreign equipment that is purchased from the U.S. or Europe.  Exchange rates have an insignificant impact on our financial results.  However, as we convert from Indian rupees to USDU.S. dollars and subsequently report in U.S. dollars, we may see an impact on translated revenue and earnings.  Essentially, a stronger USDU.S. dollars decreases our reported earnings and a weakening USDU.S. dollars increases our reported earnings.

In the analysis below, we have compared the reported revenue and expense numbers for the three months ended June 30, 2011 with the three months ended June 30, 3010 based on the average exchange rate used for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to highlight the impact of exchange rate changes on IGC’s Indian rupee derived revenues and expenses.

  
Three months ended June 30,
       
  
2011 (current
exchange rate)
  2011 (previous year exchange rate)  Change  Percentage 
Revenues
  
1,060,247
   
1,034,251
   
25,996
   
2.51
%
Total expenses before taxes
  
(1,128,582
)
  
(1,100,911
)
  
(27,671
)
  
2.51
%
   
(68,335
)
  
(66,660
)
  
(1,675
)
    

Foreign Currency Translation
 
IGC mainly operates in India and a substantial portion of the Company’s sales are denominated in the Indian rupee.   As a result, changes in the relative values of the U.S. dollar and Indian rupee affect revenues and profits as the results are translated into U.S. dollars in the consolidated and pro forma financial statements.
 
The accompanying financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars. The Indian rupee is the functional currency for the company.Company. The translation of the functional currencies into U.S. dollars is performed for assets and liabilities using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenues, costs and expenses using average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting periods. Adjustments resulting from the translation of functional currency financial statements to reporting currency are accumulated and reported as other comprehensive income/(loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
 
The exchange rates used for translation purposes are as follows:

PeriodPeriod End Average Rate (P&L rate)Period End Rate (Balance sheet rate)
Three months ended June  30, 2010INR 45.68 per USDINR 46.41 per USD
Year ended March 31, 2011INR 44.75 per USDINR 44.54 per USD
Three months ended June 30, 2011INR 44.56 per USDINR 44.59 per USD
33


Item 4T. 4.  Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controlscontrols and Procedures: Pursuantprocedures are processes and procedures designed to Rule 13a-15(b)ensure that information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (“Exchangeas amended (the “Exchange Act”),. As of June 30, 2011, management conducted an evaluation (under the Company carried out an evaluation,supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)chief executive officer and the Principal Accounting Officer (“PAO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer), pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. As part of such evaluation, management considered the matters discussed below relating to internal control over financial reporting.  A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) asin Auditing Standard No. 5 of the endPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board) is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the period coveredannual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected by this report, December 31, 2010.  In conducting the evaluation, the CEO and PAO took into account the fact that onentity’s internal control.
On January 19, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Co mmissionSEC notified the Company thatof a material weakness with the financial statements filed with the Company’s initial Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 because it did not comply with the requirements of Rule 2-02 under Regulation S-X for audited financial statements, as a result of a qualification in the auditor’s report with respect to the deconsolidation of Sricon.
31

Based upon that evaluation,  Such report has been filed without such qualification in Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s CEOForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.  After a review of the circumstances, the Chief Executive Officer and PAO werePrincipal Accounting Officer are now unable to conclude that as of December 31, 2010 the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.  The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures failed to ensure that information required to be disclosedidentify and address the issue noted by the Company inSEC regarding the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized andaudit report. 

Further, as previously reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We plan to take measures to address the deficiency by hiring or engaging as consultants additional accounting personnel with requisite experience with SEC accounting requirements to ass ist in the Company’s disclosure process.Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 15, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company, based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee and in consultation with the independent accountants, concluded that the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and the fiscal quarter of December 2009 should be restated to correct certain identified errors. Accordingly, the Company has restated its previously issued financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and the fiscal quarter of December 2009.
 
Changes in Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  As noted above,However, the Company has taken steps to rectify the material weaknesses with the financial statements filed with the Company’s initial Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.  The Company’s management has heightened its diligence in addressing the Company’s disclosure controls and, throughout the period subsequent to the identification of such material weakness, management has added and is in the process of adding additional measures to improve and evaluate the effectiveness of its controls over financial reporting.  These measures include the completion of checklists by the Company, its securities counsel and its independent auditors with respect to the accounting and reporting standards, engaging external experts of U.S. GAAP to assist in the preparation and review of financial statements, and getting a subscription to an online knowledge base to provide the latest updates on U.S. GAAP and other accounting and disclosure matters.  The Company also intends to provide U.S. GAAP and reporting training for our India-based internal accounting staff.  Currently, we continue to rely on manual steps for the consolidation of our financial statements and expect to address the systems aspects in the future as part of our continued effort to eliminate errors and significantly remediate deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting.   The Company intends to hire or engage as consultants additional accounting personnel with requisite experience with SEC accounting requirements to assist in the Company’s disclosure process.

The Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud.  Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
32

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

None.
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file with the SEC are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. The description below reflects any material changes to the risk factors affecting our business previously discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.
The following risk factors supersede the description of the risk factors in our amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 bearing the corresponding headings:
A change in government policy, a downturn in the Indian or Chinese economy, or a natural disaster could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
Our construction business is dependent on the central government of India, as well as, the Indian state governments for contracts.  Our operations and financial results may be affected by changes in the government’s policy toward building infrastructure.  In addition, the recent slowdown in the Indian economy has caused a tightening of credit and a slowdown of companies bidding on government contracts.  We foresee no immediate changes to government policy or market conditions that would adversely affect our ability to conduct business other than limited access to credit and believe that government support for infrastructure spending will remain strong but we remain subject to possible changes in Indian government and monetary policies and regulations, which are beyond our control.
The Indian government currently bans the export of ore that has a Ferrous content of 64% or more, preferring to keep that high grade ore for the production of steel in India.   The Indian government could further curtail the export of iron ore, thereby hampering our business.  If the Government were to impose a ban on the export of lesser quality ore, we would likely be forced to service our customers from sources other than India.  In addition, the government of Karnataka state has banned the transportation and export of iron ore from 10 ports on the west coast of India due to allegations of illegal mining, storage, and transportation.  The ban was initially upheld by the Karnataka High Court until regulatory action could be implemented to reduce the illegal activity.  Iron ore ex porters appealed the ban to the Indian Supreme Court which ruled on February 11, 2011 that if Karnataka state does not pass new legislation governing iron ore exports by March 31, 2011 the court will lift the ban on exports.  Currently, a significant portion of our iron ore exports, along with other companies operating from Kamataka have been halted by the ban.
The Chinese government has imposed a ban on the import of low grade iron ore by traders in China.  This ban does not extend to Chinese steel mills with licenses to import iron ore.  We have generally been in the business of exporting ore with Ferrous content between 55% and 58% (low grade).  The ban on the import of low quality ore by China has forced us to look for customers that are steel mills, which we have done, and shift the business to exporting higher quality ore, which we are now doing.  We have shifted our business to exporting ore with Ferrous content between 61% and 63.5% (high quality ore).  However, further restrictions on the import of iron ore by the Chinese government could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
33

Additional capital may be costly or difficult to obtain.
Additional capital, whether through the offering of equity or debt securities, may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. If we are unable to obtain required additional capital, we may have to curtail our growth plans or cut back on existing business. Furthermore, we may not be able to continue operating if we do not generate sufficient revenues from operations needed to stay in business.  We may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs.  These costs may be increased by our current inability to use a short-form registration statement on Form S-3 which will increase the costs and timing for any registered offering of our securities.   In addition, to the extent that we are unable to provide timely reporting of our financial results it may further impair our ability to raise capital.  We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we issue, such as, convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial condition.
Although we are required to use our best efforts to have an effective registration statement covering the issuance of the shares underlying the public warrants at the time that our warrant holders exercise their public warrants, we cannot guarantee that a registration statement will be declared effective, in which case our warrant holders may not be able to exercise our public warrants and such warrants may expire worthless.
We have issued warrants to purchase our common stock in three public offerings: our initial public offering in March 2006, a registered direct offering in September 2009 and a public offering in December 2010.  In the absence of an applicable exemption, holders of warrants issued in our public offerings will be able to exercise the warrants only if a current registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 relating to the shares of our common stock underlying the warrants is then effective. Although we have undertaken in the respective warrant agreements relating to such warrants, and therefore have a contractual obligation, to use our best efforts to maintain a current registration statement covering the shares underlying the public warrants to the extent required by federal securities laws, and we intend to comp ly with such undertaking as soon as possible,  we do not have such a registration statement currently effective and we cannot assure the warrant holders that we will be able to do so in the future. We are currently ineligible to register the warrants on a short-form registration on Form S-3 which will likely increase the time it will take to obtain an effective registration statement for exercise of the warrants.  If we fail to comply with our contractual obligations we could be liable to the holders of the warrants. In no event shall we be liable for, or any registered holder of any warrant be entitled to receive, (a) physical settlement in securities unless the conditions and requirements set forth in the warrant agreement have been satisfied, or (b) any net-cash settlement or other consideration in lieu of physical settlement in securities (provided that the holders of the warrants issued in our September 2009 and December 2010 offerings are entitled to cash payments if we fail to deli ver shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants in a timely fashion).  The value of the public warrants may be greatly reduced if a registration statement covering the shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not kept current. Such warrants may even expire worthless. The warrants issued in our initial public offering currently expire on March 3, 2011, but we currently intend to exercise our right to extend the terms of those warrants.   The warrants issued in our September 2009 and December 2010 offerings expire on September 18, 2012 and December 8, 2017 respectively.  The outstanding warrants issued in our September 2009 and December 2010 offerings, currently exercisable for an aggregate of 1,117,410 shares of common stock, give the holders of such warrants the right to exercise the warrants on a cashless basis if at the time of exercise there is not an effective registration statement available for the issuance of the shares issuable upon exercise of the war rants. We would not receive any proceeds from the cashless exercise of the warrants.
With respect to any warrants sold by us in private placements pursuant to an exemption from registration requirements under the federal securities laws, the holders of the warrants sold in such private placements would be able to exercise their warrants even if, at the time of exercise, a prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants is not current. As a result, the holders of the warrants purchased in the private placements would not have any material restrictions with respect to the exercise of their warrants.
The following risk factor supplements the risk factors set forth in our amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.
The issuance of certain of securities by us may not have been made in compliance with the federal and state securities laws, which exposes us to potential liabilities, including potential rescission rights.
On July 14, 2010 we filed our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010. The Form 10-K contained audited financial statements included a qualified opinion from our auditors pending completion of their audit procedures in respect of the deconsolidation of one of our subsidiaries. We subsequently filed an amended Form 10-K which includes an unqualified audit opinion.
 
 
34


On January 19, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") notified us that the initial financial statements filed on July 14, 2010 did not comply with the requirements of Rule 2-02 under Regulation S-X for audited financial statements because the financial statements contained a qualified opinion. As noted above, the amended Form 10-K filed on January 28, 2011 contains audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion that comply with Rule 2-02.  The Commission has indicated that as the initial Form 10-K filed on July 14, 2010 was materially deficient as a result of the inclusion of the qualified audit opinion. It was therefore deemed not to have been filed with the Commission in accordance with applicable requirements, thus making us delinquent in its filings with the Commission.
The Commission has informed us that as a result of the deemed failure to timely file a Form 10-K, it is the Staff's view that as of July 14, 2010 we ceased to be eligible to use SEC Form S-3 for the registration of the Company's securities. As the financial statements included in the original Form 10-K were also included in a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-163867) pursuant to which we offered its common stock and warrants to purchase common stock in December 2010 (the "December 2010 Offering"), the Commission has also indicated that such registration statement failed to comply with the requirements of Form S-1 due to the lack of the inclusion of unqualified audited financial statements in compliance with Commission requirements.
Since the Commission has informed us that it is the Commission's view that as of July 14, 2010 we ceased to be eligible to use Form S-3 for the registration of our securities, it is possible that any sales of our securities pursuant to our registration statements on Form S-3 since July 14, 2010 may be deemed to be unregistered sales of its securities. Since July 14, 2010, we have sold an aggregate of 2,189,660 shares of its common stock for an aggregate gross price of $1,640,004 pursuant to an at-the-market offering ("ATM") of its common stock on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160993) in sales that occurred between September 7, 2010 and January 18, 2011.  In addition, we may be deemed to have made unregistered sales of the 2,575,830 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 858,610 shares of common stock at an e xercise price of $0.90 per share sold for an aggregate gross purchase price of $1,545,498 sold pursuant to such registration statement with respect to the December Offering.
If it is determined that persons who purchased our securities after July 14, 2010 purchased securities in an offering deemed to be unregistered, then such persons may be entitled to rescission rights.  In addition, the sale of unregistered securities could subject us to enforcement actions or penalties and fines by federal or state regulatory authorities. We are unable to predict the likelihood of any claims or actions being brought against us related to these events, and there is a risk that any may have a material adverse effect on us.  To date, we have not received any rescission requests.PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

In January 2011, one of our subsidiaries, IGC-M, initiated legal proceedings against the Sricon management requesting the Company Law Board in India to stay any transactions, such as purchase, sale or a further creation of charge on Sricon’s fixed properties including land and plant and machinery, citing mismanagement of company affairs by the present management. IGC-M has also sued for recovery of the investment in Sricon and suitable compensation thereon.  Subsequently, in January 2011, the Company received a favorable order from the Company Law Board granting the requested stay. The proceedings for the recovery of investment and a suitable compensation are currently pending adjudication at the Company Law Board, Mumbai.
Item 1A.  Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report.
Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
 
On July 14, 2010During the Company filed its audited financial statements on Form 10-K for the FYE March 31, 2010 that includedthree-month period ended June 30, 2011, we issued a qualified opinion from the Company's auditors pending completiontotal of their audit procedures in respect of the deconsolidation of one of the Company's subsidiaries. The Company subsequently filed an amended Form 10-K which includes an unqualified audit opinion.
On January 19, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") notified the Company that the initial financial statements filed on July 14, 2010 did not comply with the requirements of Rule 2-02 under Regulation S-X for audited financial statements because the financial statements contained a qualified opinion. As noted above, the amended 10-K filed on January 28, 2011 contains audited financial statements with an unqualified opinion that comply with Rule 2-02.  The Commission has indicated that as the initial Form 10-K filed on July 14, 2010 was deficient as a result of the inclusion of the qualified audit opinion. It was therefore deemed not to have been filed with the Commission in accordance with applicable requirements, thus making the Company delinquent in its filings with the Commission.
The Commission has informed the Company that as a result of the deemed failure to timely file a Form 10-K, it is the Staff's view that as of July 14, 2010 the Company ceased to be eligible to use SEC Form S-3 for the registration of the Company's securities. As the financial statements included in the original Form 10-K were also included in a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-163867) pursuant to which the Company offered its common stock and warrants to purchase common stock in December 2010 (the "December 2010 Offering"), the Commission has also indicated that such registration statement failed to comply with the requirements of Form S-1 due to the lack of the inclusion of unqualified audited financial statements in compliance with Commission requirements.
35

Since the Commission has informed the Company that it is the Commission's view that as of July 14, 2010 the Company ceased to be eligible to use Form S-3 for the registration of the Company's securities, it is possible that any sales of the Company's securities pursuant to the Company's registration statements on Form S-3 since July 14, 2010 may be deemed to be unregistered sales of its securities. Since July 14, 2010, the Company has sold an aggregate of 2,189,660 shares of its common stock for an aggregate gross price of $1,640,004 pursuant to an at-the-market offering ("ATM") of its common stock on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160993) in sales that occurred between September 7, 2010 and January 18, 2011 including 816,900 shares sold for an aggregate gross price of $656,509 between October 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. In addition, the Co mpany may be deemed to have made unregistered sales of the 2,575,8301,201,662 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 858,610 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.90 per share sold for an aggregate gross purchase price of $1,545,498 sold pursuant to such registration statement with respect to the December Offering.
If it is determined that persons who purchased the Company's securities after July 14, 2010 purchased securities in an offering deemed to be unregistered, then such persons may be entitled to rescission rights. In addition, the sale of unregistered securities could subject the Company to enforcement actions or penalties and fines by federal or state regulatory authorities. We are unable to predict the likelihood of any claims or actions being brought against the Company related to these events, and there is a risk that any may have a material adverse effect on us.
In addition to the sales described above, we made the following sales of unregistered securities during the 3 months ended December 31, 2010:

During the period ended December 31, 2010 we issued 9,500 shares of common stock to American Capital Ventures and 5,500 shares of common stock to Maplehurst Investment Group pursuant to an investor relations agreement with American Capital Ventures dated July 20, 2010 providing for the issuance of 15,000 shares of our common stock to American Capital Ventures or its designees for services rendered.  These transactions were exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, which exempts private issuances of securities in which the securities are not offered or advertised to the general public.  No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid with respect to such sale. As the shares were issued for services we received no cash proceeds for the issuance of the shares.
In December 2010 we issued 200,000 shares of common stock to each of the Steven M. Oliveira 1998 Charitable Remainder Unitrust as payment of a total of $582,134 as interest and Bricoleur Partners, L.P. as considerationprincipal for the extension ofloan under the loans under promissory notesnote issued to the respective investors.investor. These transactions were exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, which exempts private issuances of securities in which the securities are not offered or advertised to the general public. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid with respect to such sales. We received no cash proceeds for the issuance of the shares.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
None.
 
Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)
 
Item 5.5.  Other Information
 
None.
 
35

Item 6.  Exhibits
 
1.13.1Co-Placement Agency Agreement between the Registrant, Source Capital Group, Inc.Amended and Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.Restated Articles of Incorporation (1)*
3.2Bylaws (2)
4.1Specimen Warrant Certificate (2)(3)*
4.2Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant. (2)(1)*
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) for the three months ended June 30, 2011, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (vi)  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2011. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
101.INSXBRL Instance Document**
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**


(1)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-124942), as amended and filed on September 22, 2006.
(2)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-124942), as amended and filed on February 14, 2006.
(3)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-163867)333-124942), as amended and filed on November 10, 2010.
(2)Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-163867), as amended and filed on October 27, 2010.May 13, 2005.

*Filed as an exhibit hereto.
**Furnished as an exhibit hereto. These certificates are furnishedIn accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to butthis Annual Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed with, the Securities"furnished" and Exchange Commission.not "filed."

 
36


SIGNSIGNAATURESTURES

 
 In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 INDIA GLOBALIZATION CAPITAL, INC. 
    
Date: February 22,August 18, 2011By:/s/ Ram Mukunda            
  Ram Mukunda 
  Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) 
    
 

 
   
    
Date: February 22,August 18, 2011By:/s/ John B. Selvaraj           
  John B. Selvaraj 
  Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 
    

 
37