UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q


Quarterly report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017


Transition report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

March 31, 2019

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to  _______


000-55152
(

Commission file number)

File Number: 000-55152

ZNERGY, INC.

(Exact nameName of registrant as specified in its charter)


Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)

Nevada

 

46-1845946

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation

or organization)

 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6102 South MacDill Avenue, Suite G
Tampa, FL 33611
33611

IRS I.D.

808 A South Huntington Street

Syracuse, Indiana 46567

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

800-931-5662

(800) 931 5662

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.0001



MAZZAL HOLDING CORP.
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes                                 No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes                                 No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer                    

Non-accelerated filer   ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company   

Emerging growth company

  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if hethe registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provide pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

Yes                                 No

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common

ZNRG

OTC

On November 13, 2017,July 12, 2021 there were 227,624,960305,208,293 shares of the registrant’sregistrant's common stock outstanding.




 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 
 

Item 1.

3

4

 

Item 2.

13

19

 

Item 3.

17

22

 

Item 4.

17

22

  

Part II- OTHER INFORMATION

18

 

Item 1.

18

23

 

Item 5.

18

23

 

Item 6.

19

24

    

20

25


 


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



ZNERGY, INC.

INDEX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONTENTS:

 
  

4

5

5

6

6

7

7

8

8

9


4

3



ZNERGY, INC.

CONDENSED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  

 March 31,

  

 December 31,

 
  

 2019

  

 2018

 
  

(UNAUDITED)

     
         

ASSETS

        

CURRENT ASSETS

        

Cash

 $15,216  $593 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

  13,522   - 

Prepaid expenses

  92,460   61,457 

Inventory

  353,432   299,428 

Total current assets

 $474,630  $361,478 

Building, furniture and equipment, net

  21,267   28,352 

TOTAL ASSETS

 $495,897  $389,830 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

        

CURRENT LIABILITIES

        

Accounts payable

 $456,182  $403,307 

Accrued expenses

  343,871   341,556 

Customer deposits

  216,325   30,642 

Advances from related parties

  270,788   222,788 

Loan from related parties

  1,310,679   1,290,304 

Total current liabilities

 $2,597,845  $2,288,597 
         

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)

        
         

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

        

 

        

  Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000

  authorized shares; no shares issued and outstanding

  -   - 

  Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares

  authorized; 256,724,960 and 236,724,960 shares issued

  and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

  25,672   23,672 

  Additional paid-in-capital

  16,108,720   14,220,537 

  Accumulated deficit

  (18,236,340)  (16,142,976)

Total stockholders' deficit

  (2,101,948)  (1,898,767)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 $495,897  $389,830 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

as

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
  (UNAUDITED)    
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $131,444  $40,507 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance  697,389   79,612 
Prepaid expenses  76,460   3,750 
Inventory  389,768   192,105 
Total current assets  1,295,061   315,974 
         
Fixed Assets, net  306,189   2,567 
Intangible assets, net  1,845   1,845 
TOTAL ASSETS $1,603,095  $320,386 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $251,131  $284,930 
Accrued expenses  185,588   139,336 
Customer deposits  64,383   6,605 
Advances  -   60,000 
Loan, building  225,000   - 
Loan from related party  892   135,749 
Total current liabilities  726,994   626,620 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
  Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000
      authorized shares; no shares issued and outstanding
  -   - 
  Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares
      authorized; 227,624,960 and 193,150,000 shares issued
      and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and
      December 31, 2016
  22,762   19,315 
  Additional paid-in-capital  11,917,435   7,626,099 
  Accumulated deficit  (11,064,096)  (7,951,648)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  876,101   (306,234)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $1,603,095  $320,386 

ZNERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THETHREE MONTHS ENDED

(Unaudited)

  

 For the Three Months Ended

 
  

 March 31,

  

 March 31,

 
  

 2019

  

 2018

 
         

Revenue

 $186,618  $482,972 

Cost of revenue

  175,402   229,628 

Gross profit

  11,216   253,344 
         

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  2,090,664   1,234,352 

  Total operating expenses

  2,090,664   1,234,352 
         

Loss from operations

  (2,079,448)  (981,008)
         

Other income (expense)

        

Other income

  1,459   - 

Interest expense

  (15,375)  (111,559)

  Total other expense

  (13,916)  (111,559)
         

Provision for income taxes

  -   - 
       - 

Net loss

 $(2,093,364) $(1,092,567)
         

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

 $(0.01) $(0.01)

 

        

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic and diluted

  256,724,960   214,644,216 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.




ZNERGY, INC.

CONDENSED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THETHREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited)


  For the Three Months Ended  For the Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30,  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Revenue $873,976  $2,461  $1,302,217  $14,701 
Cost of revenue  423,334   -   596,661   - 
Gross profit  450,642   2,461   705,556   14,701 
                 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  1,404,389   231,754   3,818,004   373,490 
                 
Loss from operations  (953,747)  (229,293)  (3,112,448)  (358,789)
                 
Other income (expense)                
Other income  -   -   -   7,136 
  Total other income  -   -   -   7,136 
                 
Provision for income taxes  -   -   -   - 
                 
Net loss $(953,747) $(229,293) $(3,112,448) $(351,653)
                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.02) $(0.00)
                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
   - basic and diluted
  214,074,451   185,060,753   205,493,759   203,991,818 

                  

Total

 
          

Additional

      

Stockholders'

 
  

Common Stock

  

Paid in

  

Accumulated

  

Equity

 
  

 Shares

  

 Amount

  

 Capital

  

 Deficit

  

 (Deficit)

 

 Balance at January 1, 2019

  236,724,960  $23,672  $14,220,537  $(16,142,976) $(1,898,767)
                     

  Stock based compensation

  -   -   90,183   -   90,183 
                     

  Shares issued for compensation

  20,000,000   2,000   1,798,000   -   1,800,000 
                     

 Net loss

  -   -   -   (2,093,364)  (2,093,364)
                     

 Balance at March 31, 2019

  256,724,960  $25,672  $16,108,720  $(18,236,340) $(2,101,948)

                  

 Total

 
          

 Additional

      

Stockholders'

 
  

 Common Stock

  

 Paid in

  

 Accumulated

  

 Equity

 
  

 Shares

  

 Amount

  

 Capital

  

 Deficit

  

 (Deficit)

 

 Balance at January 1, 2018  

  230,724,960  $23,072  $12,444,488  $(12,439,218) $28,342 
                     

  Options issued for services

  -   -   771,129   -   771,129 
                     

  Shares issued for services

  5,000,000   500   50,741   -   51,241 
                     

 Net loss

  -   -   -   (1,092,567)  (1,092,567)
                     

 Balance at March 31, 2018

  235,724,960  $23,572  $13,266,358  $(13,531,785) $(241,855)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.




ZNERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


              Total 
        Additional     Stockholders’ 
   Common Stock  Paid in  Accumulated  Equity 
   Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance at December 31, 2016  193,150,000  $19,315  $7,626,099  $(7,951,648) $(306,234)
                     
Stock and options issued for services  19,550,000   1,955   2,654,370   -   2,656,325 
                     
506b Offering                    
Stock and warrants issued for cash  10,600,000   1,060   793,941   -   795,000 
Stock and warrants issued for debt conversion  4,324,960   432   843,025   -   843,457 
                     
Net loss              (3,112,448)  (3,112,448)
                     
Balance at September 30, 2017  227,624,960  $22,762  $11,917,435  $(11,064,096) $876,101 

  

 For the Three Months Ended

 
  

March 31,

  

March 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(2,093,364) $(1,092,567)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash

        

used in operating activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  7,085   7,830 

Loss on sale of fixed assets

  -   29,739 

Non-cash interest expense

  15,375   105,560 

Stock and stock-based compensation for services

  1,890,183   771,629 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

  Accounts receivable

  (13,522)  (82,697)

  Prepaid expenses

  (31,003)  (6,341)

  Inventory

  (54,004)  (25,262)

  Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  55,190   (216,400)

  Customer deposits

  185,683   3,616 

          Net cash used in operating activities

  (38,377)  (504,893)
         

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Purchase of fixed assets

  -   (10,086)

          Net cash used in investing activities

  -   (10,086)
         

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

      Repayment of advances from related parties

  (2,000)  - 

      Proceeds of advances from related parties

  50,000   445,000 

      Proceeds of loan from related parties

  5,000   - 

          Net cash provided by financing activities

  53,000   445,000 
         

(Decrease) increase in cash

  14,623   (69,979)

Cash, beginning of period

  593   116,481 

Cash, end of period

 $15,216  $46,502 
         

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

        

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

        

Transfer of building to related party in exchange for payment of loan

 $-  $225,000 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.




ZNERGY, INC.

NOTES TOUNAUDITEDCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)
  For the Nine  For the Nine 
  Months Ended  Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net loss $(3,112,448) $(351,653)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
        
Depreciation and amortization  1,862   2,500 
Common stock and options issued for services  2,656,325   197,169 
Common stock and options issued for interest on debt converted  519,085   - 
Contributed services  -   10,640 
Accounts receivable  (617,777)  (23,480)
Prepaid expenses  (72,710)  - 
Inventory  (197,663)  (19,341)
Accounts payable & accrued expenses  21,818   69,534 
Customer deposits  57,778   - 
          Net cash used in operating activities  (743,730)  (114,631)
         
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchase of fixed assets  (80,483)  (1,213)
          Net cash used in  investing activities  (80,483)  (1,213)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
     Proceeds from issuance of common stock  795,000   - 
     Repayment of advances from third parties  (106,340)  - 
     Payments of Loan from Related Parties  (260)  - 
     Advances from third parties  226,750   123,526 
          Net cash provided by financing activities  915,150   123,526 
         
INCREASE IN CASH  90,937   7,682 
         
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  40,507   1,279 
         
CASH, END OF PERIOD $131,444  $8,961 
         
Supplemental Disclosures        
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
  Transfer of assets and liabilities to related party for return of common shares $-  $1,018,679 
  Purchase of building with note $225,000  $- 
  Repayment of debt with common stock and options $324,372  $- 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


ZNERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

PERIODS ENDEDMARCH 31, 2019AND 2018

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION


Znergy, Inc., (formerly Mazzal Holding Corp., formerly Boston Investment and Development Corp.) is a Nevada corporation (the “Company” or “Znergy”), incorporated on January 23, 2013. The originalCompany is a provider of energy-efficient lighting products, lighting controls and energy management solutions. The Company offers a full turn-key lighting solution which includes economic assessments, energy efficient analysis, installation and rebate support for the Company’s customers. The Company’s business planprimarily involves retrofitting existing lighting solutions from traditional high intensity and metal halide fluorescent lighting to energy efficient LED (Light Emitting Diode) technology.

The spread of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) around the world in the first half of 2020 has caused significant volatility in U.S. and international markets. There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as its impact on the U.S. and international economies and, as such, the Company was the construction and management of multi-family home developments and the subsequent sale thereof.


On October 26, 2015 the Company acquired Global ITS, Inc. andis unable to determine if it will have a material impact to its wholly owned subsidiary, Znergy, Inc. in order to expand into the Energy Efficiency (EE) marketplace, focusing on commercial lighting and green project financing. On February 9, 2016, the Company agreed to sell to the Mazzal Trust the real property which the Trust had previously sold to the Company and the Trust returned to the Company 149,950,000 of the 150,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the Trust.  operations.

The Company is now focused solelyunsure of the outcome of the COVID-19 novel Coronavirus pandemic on its business. The duration of the pandemic, its effect on business in general and its effect on the EE marketplaceCompany specifically are unknown to management. For example, the Company’s largest client, one of the world’s largest clothing retail stores, was forced to close its doors at the onset of the pandemic and only recently re-opened some of its stores, thereby allowing the Company to continue to retrofit these limited stores with an emphasis onits LED retrofittinglighting system. We were able to convert 27 stores starting November 26, 2019 through November 20, 2020, with the majority converted in the first quarter of 2020 before the full impact of the pandemic. The expectation is that by the last two quarters of 2021, this retailer will have opened more stores, allowing for the LED retrofit to move forward. A continuation of the pandemic, a second surge of the pandemic, or a failure to find and relamping.


commercialize a vaccine for COVID-19 could materially impact the Company’s revenues and its operations.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interimunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are unauditedof the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions torequirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.


Certain However, such information and footnote disclosures normally includedreflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been condensed or omitted in these interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statementsopinion of management, necessary for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed withfair presentation of the SecuritiesCompany's financial position and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K.

Thethe results of operations presented in this quarterly reportoperations. Results shown for interim periods ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full fiscal year. The balance sheet information as of operationsDecember 31, 2018 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 4, 2020. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with that may be expected for any future periods. Inreport.

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the opinionUnited States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of management,assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts or revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates, judgments, and assumptions used in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustmentsthose related to revenues, accounts receivable and accruals, consisting onlyrelated allowances, contingencies, and the fair values of normal recurring adjustments thatstock-based compensation. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are necessary for a fair presentationreviewed periodically and the effects of material revisions in estimates are reflected in the financial statements prospectively from the date of the results of all interim periods reported herein.


Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminatedchange in consolidation.
estimate.

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for revenue using the “completed contract method” in accordance with ASC 605-35.606-10. The Company generally has two revenue sources - installation contracts and sales of lighting products. The installation contracts are short term in duration, typically within a week. The disaggregation of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $160,768 and $25,850 for installation contracts and sale of lighting products, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the amounts were $408,437 and $24,095 for installation contracts and sale of lighting products, respectively.

When Znergy receives an order from a customer, either verbally or through a written purchase order for products such as individual lights or fixtures, but is not part of an installation contract, the Company recognizes the revenue when the goods are shipped, and title has passed to the customer.  In these arrangements, we have determined that there is one performance obligation and that revenue should be recognized at the point in time that title passes to the customer. 

Installation contract revenue is recognized when the contract is considered complete by the customer, through a written customer acceptance form.  Each contract for installation of lighting and fixtures, consists of labor and materials, and is given a unique number in the system.  Each contract is accounted for individually. The Company identifies the performance obligations, which include labor and materials and are accounted for as one contract. The transaction price is identified in advance with an agreed proposal between the Company and the customer and the price can be adjusted if, during the installation process, changes are made during the process. Under this method, contract costs are accumulated as deferred assets and billings and/or cash receipts are recorded to a deferred revenue liability account during the contract period, but no revenues, costs, or profits are recognized in operations until the completion of the contract. Costs include direct material, direct labor, subcontract labor, and allocable indirect costs. All unallocableunallocated indirect costs and corporate general and administrative costs are charged toin the periods as incurred. However, in the event a loss on a contract is foreseen, the Company will recognize the loss when such loss is determined.  A contract is considered complete when accepted by the customer.customer that the Company has satisfied its performance obligations. There were no contracts which were not complete by the end of the quarter.

Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Znergy (FL) and Znergy Holdings (FL). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Inventory

Inventory consists of a variety of LED lamps, all of which are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventory is accounted for using the FIFO basis.

Adoption of recent accounting standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance in this ASU requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company quoteshas adopted Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 utilizing the full retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of Topic 606 did not have any impact on its customersresults of operations and financial condition.

In February 2016, the total costsFASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which supersedes the current lease accounting requirements. This standard requires a lessee to record on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with lease terms of product installationmore than 12 months. In addition, this standard requires lessees to disclose certain key information about lease transactions. Upon implementation, an entity’s lease payment obligations will be recognized at their estimated present value along with a corresponding right-of-use asset. Lease expense recognition will be generally consistent with current practice. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which simplifies adoption of the new lease accounting requirements by allowing an additional transition method that will not require restatement of prior periods and materials minus the expected rebates,providing a new practical expedient for lessors to avoid separating lease and non-lease components within a contract if any, from a given utility. For projects larger than $10,000, rebatescertain requirements are met. The provisions of this guidance must be pre-approved byelected upon adoption of the utility.


Reclassification
Certainnew lease accounting requirements, which will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.

We adopted the standard as required on January 1, 2019. Consequently, we did not update previously reported financial information and the disclosures under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods prior year amountsto January 1, 2019 and elected all of the practical expedients available under the transition guidance. The new standard also provides practical expedients for ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify, and did not recognize right of use assets or lease liabilities for those leases. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases.

The adoption did not impact the business as no long-term, reportable leases existed as of March 31, 2019. We do not expect that this standard will have been reclassified for consistency witha material impact on our financial statements. While we continue to assess all of the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect oneffects of adoption, we currently believe the reported results of operations. Reclassifications have also been mademost significant effects relate to the Consolidated Condensed Statementrecognition of Cash Flowsnew right of use assets and lease liabilities on our balance sheet for our real estate and equipment operating leases, and the for the nine months ending September 30, 2016, for consistency with the current period presentation. Thissignificant new required disclosures regarding our leasing activities. We do not expect a significant change in classification does not materially affect previously reported cash flows from operations, investing or financingour leasing activities in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows,between now and had no effect on the previously reported Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations for any period.

adoption.

Recent accounting standards

In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04 “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments”, which provides updates and clarifications to three previously-issued ASUs: 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”; 2016-13, “Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”; and 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”. The adoption of this standards update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. This ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The guidance is effective non-public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The adoption method is dependent on the specific amendment included in this update as certain amendments require retrospective adoption, modified retrospective adoption, an option of retrospective or modified retrospective, and prospective adoption. The adoption of this standards update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging— Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. This ASU amends the guidance on convertible instruments and the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity and improves and amends the related EPS guidance for both Subtopics. The ASU will be effective for annual reporting periods after December 15, 2023 and interim periods within those annual periods and early adoption is permitted in annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2020. We are still assessing the impact of ASU 2020-06 on our condensed consolidated financial statements

The Company does not believe that there are any new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2 –3 - GOING CONCERN


The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of September 30, 2017, whileMarch 31, 2019, the Company has a working capital surplusdeficit of $568,067,$2,123,215, insufficient cash resources to meet its planned business objectives and recurring losses of ($2,093,364) and ($1,092,567) in the accumulated losses from operations aggregated $11,064,096three months ended March 31, 2019 and it continues to experience operating losses.March 31, 2018 respectively. The Company intends to fund operations through debt and equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements through September 2018. As such,July 2022, one year from the company is attempting to secure purchase order and asset based financing to supportdate the growth needs of the company.


consolidated financial statements were issued.

The Company is dependent upon, among other things, obtaining additional financing to continue operations and to execute its business plan. In response to these problems, management intends to raise additional funds through public or private placement offerings. No assurances can be made that management will be successful in pursuing any of these strategies.


These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.concern for the next twelve months from the date these consolidated financial statements were issued. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

NOTE 3 – FIXED ASSETS4 - BUILDING, EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE, NET

Building, furniture and equipment were comprised of the following:

  

March 31

  

December 31

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Equipment and Furniture

 $59,609  $59,609 

Accumulated Depreciation

  (38,342)  (31,257)

Net

 $21,267  $28,352 

11


Depreciation included in Selling, general and administrative expenses:

  

March 31

  

March 31

 
  

 2019

  

 2018

 
         

Depreciation Expense

 $7,085  $7,830 

NOTE5 - ADVANCES FROM RELATED PARTIES

Advances from related parties were comprised of the following:

  

March 31

  

December 31

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

B2 Opportunity Fund

 $154,788  $154,788 

Other

  116,000   68,000 
  $270,788  $222,788 

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company received an aggregate of $50,000 of short-term advances from Cary Baskin and paid $2,000 of short-term advances to Eco Energy. The amounts are non-interest bearing and payable on demand.

Since March 31, 2019, through the filing date of this report the Company has received $0 in additional advances to fund operations.

NOTE6 - LOANS FROM RELATED PARTIES

The table below sets forth a summary of the Company’s loans from related parties at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

  

March 31

  

December 31

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Rick Mikles

 $520,329  $514,579 

Wayne Miller

  656,700   642,075 

Paul Ladd

  58,650   58,650 

Cary Baskin

  75,000   75,000 
  $1,310,679  $1,290,304 

Rick Mikles

On July 22,November 15, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase agreement for a property located at 808 A South Huntington Street, Syracuse, Indiana.executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $50,000, payable to the Company’s chairman, Rick Mikles. The agreement stipulates a purchase price of $255,000 of which $30,000note was paidpayable on July 22,December 1, 2017 with interest at 4% per annum. On December 1, 2017, the payment date was extended to June 1, 2018. The balance remains outstanding.

On February 15, 2018, the Company executed a promissory note in the amount of $225,000$25,000 payable to Rick Mikles, the Company’s Chairman. The note was due 180 days after closing.  There is no interestand payable on June 1, 2018 together with interest at 4% per annum. Pursuant to the balance due.  The square footageterms of the buildingnote, if the note and accrued interest is approximately 2,348.  The property also includes 27 storage units generating approximately $19,000not paid by the due date, interest at 12% per year rental income.  The Company closedannum shall be accrued on the property on September 1, 2017.



NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

outstanding balance until paid in full. The Company was granted a federally registered trademark for “ZNERGY”. The cost of applying for and prosecuting this trademark was $1,845 which cost was accounted for as a non-amortizing intangible asset.

NOTE 5 – LOANS FROM RELATED PARTY

  
September 30,
2017
  
December 31,
2016
 
Loans from related party $892  $135,749 

The loanbalance at December 31, 20162018 was $27,125 which includes unpaid interest.

On March 2, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $200,000 payable to Rick Mikles, the Company’s Chairman. The note was due on June 1, 2018 together with interest of $2,500. Pursuant to the terms of the note, there was a 15-day grace period, which ended on June 16, 2018 at which time a 15% penalty of the unpaid balance became due and payable together with the unpaid principal and accrued interest. The balance at December 31, 2018 was $475,000, which includes unpaid interest and penalties.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received various loans from the Company’s chairman, Rick Mikles, with a balance of $200,000 as of December 31, 2018. These loans were non-interest bearing and payment is due on demand.

Accrued interest incurred on the outstanding loans to the chairman for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $5,750.

Since March 31, 2019, through the filing date of this report the company has received $496,000 in additional loans from B2 Opportunity Fund, LLC,Mr. Mikles. The notes bear interest at 10%. In February 2021 the Company and Mr. Mikles agreed to consolidate all outstanding debt and accrued interest into a majorsingle Note in the amount of $928,238. The Note is payable upon demand.

Wayne Miller

On November 27, 2017, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $200,000, payable to Mr. Wayne Miller, a shareholder of the Company,Company. The note was due and is unsecured, bears nopayable with interest and is repayableof $2,000 on demand. This loanDecember 31, 2017. The note was repaid byin full, with interest on December 22, 2017. Under the issuance of 1,809,987 shares of common stock and 1,809,987 options to purchase common stock during June 2017 (see Note 6).


NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

On January 25, 2017 the Company appointed Richard Mikles as Chairman of the board of directors and issued to Mr. Mikles 3,000,000 shares of its common stock, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 4,000,000 options to purchase shares of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share said options vesting equally over eight quarters and having an expiration of three years from the date of issue. Concomitantly, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Mikles to provide marketing, strategic, and organizational services to the Company. Upon execution of this consultingnote agreement, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 5,000,000 optionswarrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of common stock$0.15 per share. The warrants expired on the first anniversary date of the initial exercise date of the warrants. The Company atevaluated the warrants in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and determined that the warrants did not meet the definition of a priceliability and therefore did not account for them as a separate derivative liability. The fair value of $0.10 per share said optionsthe warrants was calculated using the Black-Sholes model amounting to vest quarterly$55,072, and was recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the term of the note. As of December 31, 2017, the debt discount was fully amortized.

On December 6, 2017, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of one option for every two dollars of revenue recognized by the Company.


On January 27, 2017 the Company appointed Kevin Harrington$150,000 payable to its Board of Directors and issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 4,000,000 options to purchase shares of common stockMr. Wayne Miller, a shareholder of the Company at a priceCompany. The note was due and payable on March 12, 2018, with interest of $0.10 per share said options vesting equally over eight quarters and having an expiration of three years from$6,000. Under the date of issue.

On February 2, 2017 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Venture Legal Services, PLLC, to provide legal and strategic advisory services for the Company. In conjunction with the execution of thisnote agreement, the Company granted Venture optionsissued warrants to purchase up to 2,000,0001,000,000 shares of its common stock at aan exercise price of $0.10$0.15 per share. The options have an expiration of three years fromwarrants expire on the first anniversary date of issuethe initial exercise date of the warrants. The Company evaluated the warrants in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and vest quarterly one optionHedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and determined that the warrants did not meet the definition of a liability and therefore did not account for every two dollarsthem as a separate derivative liability. The fair value of revenue recognized bythe warrants was calculated using the Black-Sholes model amounting to $42,345, and was recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the term of the note. As of December 31, 2018, the debt discount was fully amortized and the principal balance of the note remains unpaid. Pursuant to the terms of the note, there was a 15-day grace period granted, which ended on March 27, 2018, at which a 15% penalty on the unpaid balance became due and payable along with the unpaid principal and any accrued interest.

On January 8, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $150,000 payable to Mr. Wayne Miller, a shareholder of the Company.

The note was due and payable on April 8, 2018, with interest of $6,000. Pursuant to the terms of the note, there was a 15-day grace period, which ended on April 23, 2018 at which time a 15% penalty of the unpaid balance became due and payable together with the unpaid principal December 31, 2018 was $179,700, which includes unpaid principal, interest, and penalties. Under the note agreement, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The warrants expire on the first anniversary date of the initial exercise date of the warrants. The Company evaluated the warrants in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and determined that the warrants did not meet the definition of a liability and therefore did not account for them as a separate derivative liability. The fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Sholes model amounting to $47,867, and was recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the term of the note. As of December 31, 2018, the debt discount was fully amortized and the principal balance of the note remains unpaid.

On March 22, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $20,000 payable to Mr. Wayne Miller, a shareholder of the Company. The note has interest at accruing at 10% per annum. The balance at December 31, 2018 was $10,250 which includes unpaid interest.

On October 4, 2018, the Company also borrowed $275,000 short-term payable to Wayne Miller. The balance as of December 31, 2018 is $281,875 which includes the unpaid principal and interest. This loan was due on April 3, 2019.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company executed additional loans to Mr. Miller. The accrued interest for the period were $14,625 and $7,750 respectively.

Paul Ladd

On March 22, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $50,000 payable to Paul Ladd, a shareholder. The note was due and payable on May 15, 2017,21, 2018 together with interest of $1,000. Pursuant to the terms of the note, there was a 15-day grace period, which ended on June 4, 2018 at which time a 15% penalty of the unpaid balance became due and payable together with the unpaid principal and accrued interest. The balance at December31, 2018 was $58,650 which includes the unpaid principal, interest, and penalties. Under the note agreement, the Company issued warrants to purchase 50,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The warrants expire on the first anniversary date of the initial exercise date of the warrants. The Company evaluated the warrants in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 - 40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock and determined that the warrants did not meet the definition of a liability and therefore did not account for them as a separate derivative liability. The fair value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Sholes model amounting to $2,875, and was recorded as a debt discount and amortized over the term of the note. As of December 31, 2018, the debt discount was fully amortized and the principal balance of the note remains unpaid.

Cary Baskin

On October 23, 2018, the Company also borrowed $75,000 in a non-interest bearing short-term payable to Cary Baskin, and was secured by shares owned by the Company’s CEO. The balance as of December 31, 2018 is $75,000. This loan was due on December 31, 2018.

Total interest expense under the related party loans was $15,375 and $33,059 as of March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, respectively. Such interest was capitalized as part of the outstanding loan balance.

Since March 31, 2019, through the filing date of this report the Company has received $589,126 in additional loans from Mr. Baskin. The notes bear interest at 10%.

Since March 31, 2019, through the filing date of this report the Company has received $450,000 in additional loans from other related parties. The notes bear interest at 10%.

NOTE8 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Common Stock

On January 1, 2019, under an employment agreement, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares to its Chief Executive Officer. Under this agreement there is no specific performance or time based metrics. The shares were valued at fair on the date of issuance.

On February 12, 2018, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Rick Mikles, the Company's Chairman, to become Chief Marketing Officer.  The agreement has a three-year term, an annual base salary of $26,000 and a quarterly payment based on 3% of the quarterly revenue recognized by the Company.  Mr. Baker, our CEO.  Mr. BakerMikles was granted 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, of the Company, valued at its trading price andof $0.10 per share, which vested immediately, andimmediately.  He was granted 5,000,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share.  These options have a three-year expiration and vest quarterly one option forper every two2 dollars of revenue recognized by the Company.


On May 15, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Floyd, our CFO.  Mr. Floyd was granted 10,000,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share. These options have a three-year expiration and vest quarterly one option for every two dollars of revenue recognized by the Company.

On June 1, 2017, the Company entered into a service agreement with a provider of investor relations services. Under the agreement, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to the provider, valued at its trading price, vesting 500,000 on June 1, 2017, 250,000 shares on October 1, 2017 and 250,000 shares on January 1, 2018.

On June 13, 2017, the Company entered into a service agreement with a provider of bookkeeping, accounting, payroll and human resources services.  Under the agreement, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to the provider, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 1,000,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share.  These options have a three-year expiration and vest evenly over two years.
On July 10, 2017 the Company entered into an employment agreement with Ryan Smith, 60, to serve as Senior Vice President of the Company. The agreement has a term of three years, and Mr. Smith’s employment with the Company is on an at-will basis.  The agreement specifies an annual base salary of $100,000 and a performance based bonus within 45 days from the end of the Company’s fiscal year as determined by the

Stock Based Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Smith was granted 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, vested immediately, and was granted 7,000,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share. The Options have a three-year expiration and vest quarterly one option for every two dollars of revenue recognized by the Company.


On July 13, 2017, the Company entered into a service agreement with a provider of tax services.  Under the agreement, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to the provider, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 400,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share. These options have a three-year expiration and vest evenly over two years.

On July 13, 2017, the Company amended and extended a consulting agreement, originally executed on January 23, 2017, with its Chairman, Rick Mikles. Under the amended and extended agreement, the Company issued 1,600,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Mikles, valued at its trading price and vested immediately.

On August 31, 2017, the Company entered into an advisory agreement with Donald Herrmann of Tampa, Florida. Under the agreement, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Herrmann, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 900,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at $0.10 per share. These options have a three-year expiration and vest evenly over two years.

On September 19, 2017 the Company appointed Jennifer Peek to its Board of Directors and as its Audit Committee Chair and issued 1,500,000 shares of its common stock, valued at its trading price and vested immediately, and 1,500,000 options to purchase shares of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.10 per share. The options vest equally over eight quarters and having an expiration of three years from the date of issue.

Private Offerings of Common Stock and Warrants
During the period ended June 30, 2017 the Company completed a private offering of common stock and warrants to accredited and unaccredited investors for gross proceeds of $1,119,372 which securities were offered under Regulation D, Rule 506(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933. The Company accepted subscriptions, in the aggregate, for 14,924,960 shares of common stock and one-year warrants to purchase 14,924,960 shares of common stock of which 10,600,000 shares of its common stock and 10,600,000 warrants were issued for $795,000 in cash and 4,324,960 shares of its common stock and 4,324,960 warrants were issued for $324,372 in the conversion of debt. Investors received one-year fully vested warrant to purchase up to 100% of the number of shares purchased in the offering. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The purchase price for each share of common stock together with the warrants was $0.075.  For the debt converted, the difference between the amount of debt converted and the fair value of the common stock and warrants issued of $519,085 has been charged to interest expense.

Options

The Company has issued and outstanding two types of options, time vesting and performance vesting.

14

Options - Time Vesting


There were 2,400,000 options issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 that vest equally over time.

The following table shows the stock option activity for time vesting options during the period ended September 30, 2017:

  
Number of
Options
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
       
Options outstanding at beginning of year  2,400,000  $0.10 
Changes during the period:        
Granted - at market price  11,800,000  $0.10 
Exercised  -     
Expired  -     
Options outstanding at end of period  14,200,000  $0.10 
Options exercisable at end of period  5,204,168  $0.10 
Options issuedMarch 31, 2019:

      

Weighted

 
  

Number of

  

Average

 
  

 Options

  

Exercise Price

 

Options outstanding at beginning of period

  13,904,166  $0.10 

Changes during the period:

        

Granted - at market price

  -   0.10 

Exercised

  -   - 

Forfeited

  -   0.10 

Adjustments

  -   - 

Options outstanding at end of period

  13,904,166   0.10 

Options exercisable at end of period

  13,591,666   0.10 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period

  -   - 

Costs incurred in respect of stock-based compensation for employees, advisors and consultants for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 were valued using the Black-Scholes model assuming zero dividends, a $0.10 strike price, 3-year expiration, 1.51% average risk-free rate and 255% average volatility.$49,230. Costs incurred in respect of stock based compensation related to time-vested options for employees, advisors and consultants for the three and nine-monthmonth periods ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 were approximately $122,000$129,562. The expense is included in selling, general and $295,000, respectively. Costs incurredadministrative expenses in respectthe statement of stock based compensation related to time-vested options for employees, advisors and consultants for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

operations.

Unrecognized compensation costs related to time-vested options as of March 31, 2019 was approximately $800,000$25,938, which is expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted average period of approximately 2212 months.


Options - Performance Vesting


There were 5,000,000

The options issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 that vest based on Company performance with one option vesting for every two dollars of revenue, vesting quarterly. The following table shows the stock option activity for performance vesting options during the period ended September 30, 2017:

  
Number of
Options
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
       
Options outstanding at beginning of year  5,000,000  $0.10 
Changes during the period:        
Granted - at market price  30,800,000  $0.10 
Exercised  -     
Expired  -     
Options outstanding at end of period  35,800,000  $0.10 
Options exercisable at end of period  3,641,815  $0.10 
OptionsMarch 31, 2019:

      

Weighted

 
  

Number of

  

Average

 
  

 Options

  

Exercise Price

 

Options outstanding at beginning of period

  26,081,808  $0.10 

Changes during the period:

        

Granted - at market price

      0.10 

Exercised

  -   - 

Expired/forfeited

  -   0.10 

Adjustments

      - 

Options outstanding at end of period

  26,081,808   0.10 

Options exercisable at end of period

  9,739,785   0.10 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period

  -  $- 

These options were issued to individuals for their business development efforts. The costs incurred in respect of stock-based compensation for employees, advisors and consultants for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 were valued using the Black-Scholes model assuming zero dividends, a $0.10 strike price, 3-year expiration, 1.62% average risk-free rate and 259% average volatility.$40,953. Costs incurred in respect of stock based compensation related to performance vested options for employees, advisors and consultants for the three and nine-monthmonth periods ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 were approximately $282,000$142,067. The expense is included in selling, general and $381,000, respectively. Costs incurredadministrative expenses in respectthe statement of stock based compensation related to performance-vested options for employees, advisors and consultants for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

operations

Unrecognized compensation costs related to options as of March 31, 2019 was approximately $3,441,000$1,421,600 which is expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted average period of approximately 1213 months.



Warrants


There were no warrants issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016.

The following table shows the warrant activity during the period ended September 30, 2017:

     Weighted 
  Number  Average 
  Of  Exercise 
  Warrants  Price 
       
Warrants outstanding at beginning of year  -    
Changes during the period:       
Granted  14,924,960  $0.15 
Exercised  -     
Expired  -     
Warrants outstanding at end of period  14,924,960  $0.15 
Warrants exercisable at end of period  14,924,960     
         

Warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes model assuming zero dividends, a $0.15 strike price, 1-year expiration, 1.49% risk-free rate and volatility of 238%. March 31, 2019:

      

Weighted

 
  

Number of

  

Average

 
  

Warrants

  

Exercise Price

 

Warrants outstanding at beginning of period

  3,050,000  $0.15 

Changes during the period:

        

Granted

  -   - 

Exercised

  -   - 

Expired/forfeited

  (1,050,000)  0.15 

Warrants outstanding at end of period

  2,000,000   0.15 

Warrants exercisable at end of period

  2,000,000  $0.15 

Costs incurred for warrants issued to related parties for the conversion of debt were recorded as interest expensesexpense and werewas $0 and $367,662$50,741 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and nine months ending September 30, 2017,2018, respectively.


NOTE 7 – LITIGATION

9 - BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net attributable to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and the dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The Company's dilutive common stock equivalent shares, which include incremental common shares issuable upon i) the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and (ii) vesting of restricted stock units and restricted stock awards, are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share when their effect is dilutive. Since the Company had net losses for all periods presented, all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive. Accordingly, basic and dilutive net loss per share are equal.

The following potential common stock equivalents were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share because the inclusion thereof would be anti-dilutive.

  

Three Months Ended

 
  

March 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 
         

Stock Options

  39,985,974   42,841,094 

Warrants

  2,000,000   3,050,000 

Total

  41,985,974   45,891,094 

NOTE10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

16(b) Litigation

On September 26, 2016, Registrant filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida a Complaint against defendants The Mazzal Trust, Nissim S. Trabelsi and Shawn Telsi (collectively the “Defendants”), seeking the disgorgement of profits obtained by Defendants and certain of their shareholder affiliates defined under Rule 16a-1(a)(1) under the Exchange Act defined below (collectively, the “Group”) through “short swing profits” in violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Specifically, Registrant alleged that the Group acted under the guidance and control of the Defendants, whose individual defendants had filed forms 3 and 4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), declaring themselves to be “insiders” for the purpose of Section 16(b). The Group owned 100% of the shares of Registrant at the time that members of the group were engaged in the sale and purchase of such shares. The sales and purchases referenced all occurred within sixwith three months of other sales and purchases, subjecting Defendants to disgorge to Registrant all profits made by the Group in such sales and purchases. As detailed in paragraphs 16-22 of the Complaint, the total profits received by the Group is $1,695,689. Accordingly, Registrant has demanded the return of all such profits to Registrant plus the statutory payment of attorneys’ fees.

On August 24, 2017, the court grantedPlaintiff received a Clerk’s Entry of Default against Nissim Trabelsi. The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment for damages against Trabelsi on September 13, 2017, which to date has not been addressed by the Court. On March 5, 2018, Nissim Trabelsi filed a notice of bankruptcy. The Plaintiff is still pursuing its options in the Case and the Court has yet to address the service issues with the Mazzal Trust.

NOTE 11 CONCENTRATIONS

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 four customers represented 35%, 27%, 13% and 12% of net customer installation and product sale revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the company recognized installation revenue of $178,898 from one customer, which represents 37% of revenue for the quarter.

At March 31, 2019, two customers represented 71% and 16% of net accounts receivable. At December 31, 2018, two different customers represented 83% and 18% respectively of net accounts receivable.

The Company purchases substantially all its inventory from one supplier. The Company does not have any commitments with this supplier for minimum purchases.

NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Since March 31, 2019, through the filing date of this report the Company has received $496,000 in additional advances and loans from the Chairman of the Board. In February 2021, the Company agreed to consolidate the total loans, advances and accrued interest into a default judgment against Defendants.single Note in the amount of $928,238, the full amount of which is payable upon demand. Since March 31, 2019 through the filing date of this report the Company received $589,126 from Mr. Baskin and a further $500,000 from other related parties.

Subsequent to March 31, 2019 through the filing date, the Company has issued 45,983,333 shares of common stock. 11,200,000 shares were issued to the Chairman of the Board in exchange for the cancellation of 14,000,000 stock options outstanding. In addition 4,000,000 shares were issued to a Director, Jerry Horowitz in exchange for business development efforts. Through these efforts, the Company was introduced to a large retailer which resulted in a multi-store contract.

On September 10, 2019, the Company executed an unsecured $275,000 promissory note payable to Randy Fluitt, a Company shareholder. The Note bears interest of 10% per annum. The Note is due and payable in the amount of $302,500 on or before the Maturity Date of February 1, 2020. The Company’s failure to pay the principal and interest within 15 days of the Maturity Date, will trigger a penalty of 10% of any amounts unpaid at the end of this period. The Company intendsdid not repay the loan by the Maturity Date and accrued the penalty as interest expense. In addition, 2,000,000 warrants are to vigorously pursue satisfactionbe issued at a strike price of this judgment although there can be no assurance of$.10 with a one year maturity.

On December 19, 2019, the recovery of any fundsCompany issued 2,500,000 shares in exchange for $192,500 to an unrelated accredited investor.

On November 26, 2019, the Company received a third-party loan from Defendants.

VStock Transfer Communications
On January 26, 2017,the Korenstra Family Foundation for $150,000.

In April 2020, the Company received an email from its transfer agent, VStock Transfer, LLC,unsecured loan (the “SBA Loan”) under the Small Business Administration (“VStock”SBA”) informingPaycheck Protection Program of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act CARES Act through Chase Bank (“Lender”).  The SBA Loan has a two-year term expiring on April 2022. The SBA Loan has a principal amount of $87,457 with an interest rate of 1.0%. The Company expects that the full principal amount of the loan will be forgiven.  Interest accrues during the period between funding date and the date the loan is forgiven. The Company has not yet applied for loan forgiveness but plans to in a future period.

In May 2020, the Company that it had been servedreceived an unsecured loan under the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program to assist business businesses effected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The EIDL Loan has a thirty-year term and has a principal amount of $150,000 with a Summons and Complaint (B2 Opportunity Fund (“B2”) v. Trabelsi et al. - Index No.:17-CV-10043, the “Claim”) and further statingan interest rate of 3.75%. The Company expects that the Company was obligated to indemnify VStock for feesfull principal amount of the loan will be forgiven.  Interest accrues during the period between funding date and expenses incurred in defending the Claim.date the loan is forgiven. The Company responded on February 24, 2017 stating that (1) we reviewed the Transfer Agent and Registrar Agreement between Mazzal and VStock dated May 20, 2014 and thathas not yet applied for loan forgiveness but plans to in Article VI(c) of that agreement it states that indemnification will not be offered if the acts of VStock constitute bad faith or gross negligence, (2) we reviewed the lawsuit filed by B2 against VStock and others and find that VStock’s actions constitute gross negligence and perhaps bad faith, and we therefore deny indemnification of VStock relating to the Claim, and (3) should VStock take any action to seek indemnification by Znergy in any manner, Znergy will either join B2 in its lawsuit or will file an action on its own. The Company terminated its agreement with VStock. Management cannot at this time estimate what, if any, financial impact this matter will have on the Company.

a future period.

17

NOTE 8 – CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 we had one customer whose purchases accounted for 79% of sales. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 we had one utility whose rebates accounted for 20% of sales.

At September 30, 2017, there was one customer and one utility who each had an accounts receivable balance greater than 10% of our total outstanding receivable balance.


On December 7, 2020, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Tysadco Partners, LLC for the sum of $156,750. The Note bears interest of 12% per annum until the Note becomes due and payable on December 7, 2022 (Maturity Date). Any amount of principal or interest on this Note which is note repaid by the Maturity Date shall then bear interest at 20% per annum. At any time after 180 days from the Note’s inception until the Maturity Date or payment date, Tysadco may convert the balance or any portion of the balance to Common Stock at the lower of $.15 per share or 80% of the Market Price. Where the Market Price is defined as the ten day trading period prior to the conversion date.

On March 11, 2021, the Company closed a purchase agreement between the Company and Quantum Energy and the Company and Quantum’s owner, Jim Collins. Customer lists and name recognition were acquired from Quantum for $1. Further, the Company shall pay a 10% commission for any sales derived from Quantum’s pre-existing sales or audits that generate revenue for the Company. Quantum’s owner, Jim Collins agreed to a consulting agreement with the Company for a three year period. This consulting agreement states that Mr. Collins shall act as a sales manager, primarily in the Washington State area and he shall receive an 8% commission on any new sale generated. During this three year period, Mr. Collins shall receive 2,000,000 shares of the Company, vesting one third each year. The Company executed a consulting agreement with Justin Collins to be the Company’s National Project Manager. Under this agreement, Mr. Justin Collins, shall receive a commission of 6% on new sales and an additional bonus of 20% on the differential between budgeted and actual expense, should budgeted expense exceed actual. After a 90 day period, the Company has agreed to negotiations, at its sole discretion, for Mr. Justin Collins to become the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. The stated salary for this position is $80,000 per annum.


18

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events, and they are applicable on as of the dates of such statement.  These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “forecast,” “expect,” “plan,” anticipate,“anticipate,” believe,“believe,estimate,“estimate,” continue,“continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions.  Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those listed under the heading “Risk Factors” and those listed in our other SEC filings. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.  These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available on our website or otherwise, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we will refer to Znergy, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our.”


“our”.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition should be read together with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in this Form 10-Q as well as our audited Financial Statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on September 4, 2020.

Item 2.  Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Overview


The Company was formed in January 2013 as a Nevada corporation.  The original business plan of the Company was to build and sell multi-family housing projects. The Company acquired a parcel of land in Taunton, Massachusetts, from The Mazzal Trust, a trust of which the founder of the Company, Nissim Trabelsi, was the Trustee, in exchange for shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock, and began development of the project and construction of multi-family units.


Subsequently, on

On October 26, 2015, the Company acquired Global ITS, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (“Global”), and its wholly owned subsidiary, Znergy, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Znergy”), in order to expand into the Energy Efficiency (EE) marketplace, focusing on commercial lighting and green project financing.


On February 9, 2016, the Company agreed to sell to Thethe Mazzal Trust the real property which the Trust had previously sold to the Company and the Trust returned to the Company 149,950,000 of the 150,000,000 shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock owned by the Trust, which shares were cancelled.Trust.  This transaction caused a change of control with Global being the accounting acquirer. The Company is now focused solely on the EE marketplace. Both of these transactions are discussed in more detail below.

Recent Developments

Global ITS Transaction

Share Exchange Agreement

On October 26, 2015, themarketplace with an emphasis on LED retrofitting and installing new lamps.

The Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) withdetermined that Global ITS, Inc., served no purpose for the Company.  It held no assets or operations, had been dormant for over a Wyoming corporation (“Global”), andyear, except for the shareholdersoperations of Global, pursuant to which we exchanged 120,000,000 of our common shares (the “Company Shares”) for 24,000,000 Global common shares held by Global’s shareholders representingits wholly owned Subsidiary.  On October 1, 2018, the Company sold 100% of Global’s outstandingits shares (the “Share Exchange”). The transaction was reported in and the Agreement was filed as an exhibitGlobal to Peter Peterson, a Current Report filed with the SEC on October 27, 2015.


Change in Control Transaction

On February 9, 2016, the Company, Nissim Trabelsi, Shawn Telsi, the Mazzal Living Trust, the majority shareholder of the Company (the “Trust”), and B2 Opportunity Fund, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“B2”), entered intocreditor of Global for a nominal amount. The sale did not include Global's investment in its subsidiary.

The Company is a provider of energy-efficient lighting products, lighting controls and energy management solutions. The Company offers a full turn-key lighting solution which includes economic assessments, energy efficient analysis, installation and rebate support for the Company's customers.  The Company's business primarily involves retrofitting existing lighting solutions from traditional high intensity metal halide and fluorescent lighting to energy efficient LED (Light Emitting Diode) technology.

Managing energy consumption and the associate costs is increasingly important to building owners.  Technological advancements in LED, together with significant private and public incentives for sustainability initiatives have made lighting infrastructure changes an Amended Master Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Master Agreement”).


Pursuanteffective way for building owners to cut energy costs. LED lighting provides energy efficiency, long life, low running temperatures and increasing technology such as dimmable lights.

The Company does not have long term contracts with its customers and the Master Agreement, Mr. Trabelsi and Mr. Telsi agreed to sell allCompany's revenue comes from the sales of lighting systems involving the sharesreplacement of the Company’s common stock owned by them, 45,800,000 shares and 9,500,000 shares, respectively, to B2 or B2’s designees.existing lighting fixtures with new energy efficient LED fixtures. In connection with the Master Agreement, B2 paid $315,000 to Mr. Trabelsi for his and Mr. Telsi’s shares.

Also in connection with the Master Agreement,addition, the Company agreed to sell to the Trust all of its real property with a carrying value of $1,897,000,generates revenue from available utility incentives and the Trust assumed the related party loan with a carrying value of $853,521 and accounts payable and accrued expenses with a carrying value of $24,500. In exchange, the Trust returned to the Company 149,950,000 of the 150,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the Trust. In connection with the execution of the Master Agreement, the Company canceled the 149,950,000 shares of common stock conveyed by the Trust.

rebate programs.

In connection with his sale of his and Mr. Telsi’s shares, Mr. Trabelsi appointed Christopher J. Floyd to the Board of Directors

The Company provides its turn-key service though a detailed evaluation of the Companycustomer's needs and to the Board of Directors of Command Control Center Corp. (“Command Control”), a wholly owned subsidiaryperforming an audit of the Company. Mr. Trabelsi also appointed Mr. Floydcustomer's current energy consumptions and costs, together with an analysis of the benefits of retrofitting their lights.  Typically, the customer experiences an average payback on their investment between 12 and 24 months.

The Company intends to grow organically by selling energy efficiency (EE) and commercial security (CS) products to industrial and commercial businesses as well as municipal and state governments, universities and colleges, K-12 schools, and hospitals (the “MUSH” market). Strained government budgets have convinced state and local governments across the CEO, CFO,United States to embrace a new form of performance-based investments in energy efficiency offered by Energy Services Companies, or ESCOs. An ESCO provides energy-efficiency-related and Secretaryother value-added services and for which performance contracting is a core part of bothits energy-efficiency services business. In a performance contract, the ESCO guarantees energy or financial savings for the project, which means ESCOs only make money if the project performs as promised. A study prepared by Allied Market Research indicated that the market is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 13.76% during the forecast period 2014-2020 and reach $44.4 billion by 2020.

The Company plans to increase its competitive position by providing financing to customers for installation projects through a strategic partnership the Company and of Command Control. Following Mr. Trabelsi’s appointment of Mr. Floyd to the boards of directors and as an officer of the Company and Command Control, Mr. Trabelsi resigned from all positionshas developed with the Company and with Command Control, effective immediately.


a well-established funding group focused on energy efficiency projects.

Results of Operations


The Company had revenues of $1,302,217$186,618 and $14,701 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company had revenues of $873,976 and $2,461$482,972 for the three-month periodsperiod ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, and September 30, 2016,2018, respectively. Revenues in 20172019 and 2018 comprise LED installation projects and associated rebates from utilities whileutilities.  The decrease in revenues in 2016 consist of consulting services.  The increase in revenuesfor the three-month period is due to as compared to the increasesame period in personnel, implementing formalized training programs, resulting2018 was primarily driven by the Covid-19 pandemic and related closures and shutdowns. In late 2018 and the first quarter of 2019 the Company began expanding inventory and installation staff in increased sales and marketing efforts.  The Company expectspreparation for a retail outlet conversion project which was to continue to see increased revenue in future periods but can make no assumptions as to sizeencompass a total of any increases or certainty thereof.


514 stores.

The Company incurred costs of revenue of $596,661$175,402 and $-0- for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company incurred costs of revenue of $423,334 and $-0-$229,628 for the three-month periodsperiod ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019 and September 30, 2016,2018, respectively. Costs of revenue in 20172019 and 2018 comprise primarily LED product and installation costs, including labor and rental equipment.

Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue can be impacted by the type of jobs and if the job requires customized lighting

The Company had selling, general and administrative expenses of $3,818,004$2,090,664 and $373,490 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, and September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company had general and administrative expenses of $1,404,389 and $231,754$1,234,352 for the three-month periodsperiod ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019 and September 30, 2016,2018, respectively. General and administrative expensesThe increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 are comprisedthree-month period is primarily of $2,656,325due to an increase in common stock and options issued for services, $519,085 in common stock and warrants issued for interest related to the conversion of debt, $208,973 in salaries and wages, and $54,060 in legal and auditing fees. General and administrative costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 consisted primarily of $203,548 in consulting fees and $57,545 in legal and auditing fees.  General and administrative costs for the three months ended September 30, 2017 are comprised primarily of stock based compensation and consulting costsassociated taxes in 2019 as compared to 2018. On January 1, 2019, we issued 20,000,000 shares to our CEO. The expense associated with this grant was $1,800,000 which was the main driver of $584,875 and personnel expenses of $229,815.  Generalour March 31, 2019 increase in general and administrative costsexpenses.

The Company incurred interest expense of $15,375 and $111,559 for the three monthsthree-month period ended September 30, 2016 are comprised primarilyMarch 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease in interest expense is the result of the exchange of debt for common stock based consulting costs of $166,667 and professional fees of $29,998.

during the period.

The Company had net losses of $3,112,448$2,093,364 and $351,653 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company had net losses of $953,747 and $229,293$1,092,567 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and September 30, 2016,2018, respectively.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of September 30, 2017, the Company had a working capital surplus of $568,067 with total current assets of $1,295,061 comprising $131,444 in cash, $697,389 in accounts receivable, $76,460 in prepaid expenses, and $389,768 in inventory, and total current liabilities of $726,994 comprising $251,131 in accounts payable, $185,588 in accrued expenses, $64,383 in customer deposits, and $225,000 in a note due February 28, 2018 for the purchase of a building. Use of cash for operating activities totaled $743,730 primarily for funding an increase in accounts receivable of $617,777 and inventory of $197,663. The primary source of funds was loans from related parties in the amount of $226,750 and proceeds from the offering of our common stock in the amount of $795,000.

Going Concern Discussion
For the year ending December 31, 2016, our auditors issued an explanatory note regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. This means that our auditors believe there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next 12 months. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than operations. Our only other source for cash at this time is investments by third parties and loans from others in our company.

As of September 30, 2017, management believes that generating revenues in the next six to twelve months is important to support our planned ongoing operations. However, we cannot guarantee that we will generate such growth. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow to support our operations over the next six to twelve months, we will need to raise additional capital by issuing capital stock in exchange for cash or obtain loans in order to continue as a going concern. There are no formal or informal agreements to attain such financing. We cannot assure you that any financing can be obtained or, if obtained, that it will be on reasonable terms. Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for us to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the financial statements to reflect our doubt to continue as a going concern.

At the time of this filing we have three officers: David Baker, our CEO; Christopher Floyd, our CFO and Secretary; and Ryan Smith, our Senior Vice President. Mr. Baker and Mr. Floyd are responsible for our managerial and organizational structure which will include preparation and implementation of disclosure and accounting controls under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. When these controls are implemented, Mr. Baker and Mr. Floyd, together with any other executive officers in place at that time, will be responsible for the administration of these controls.

Our management does not expect to incur significant research and development costs in 2017.

On July 22, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase agreement for a property located at 808 A South Huntington Street, Syracuse, Indiana. The agreement stipulates a purchase price of $255,000 of which $30,000 was paid on July 22, 2017 with the balance of $225,000 due 180 days after closing.  There is no interest payable on the balance due. The square footage of the building itself is approximately 2,348.  The property also includes 27 storage units generating approximately $19,000 per year rental income. The Company closed on the property on September 1, 2017.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s most critical accounting policies include (a) use of estimates, (b) revenue recognition, (c) going concern, and (d) share based payments. The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its financial statements.

(a) Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts or revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates, judgments and assumptions used in these consolidated financial statements include those related to revenues, accounts receivable and related allowances, contingencies, and the fair values of stock-based compensation. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of material revisions in estimates are reflected in the financial statements prospectively from the date of any change in estimate. 
(b) Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for revenue using the “completed contract method” in accordance with ASC 605-35. Under this method, contract costs are accumulated as deferred assets and billings and/or cash receipts are recorded to a deferred revenue liability account during the contract period but no revenues, costs or profits are recognized in operations until the completion of the contract. Costs include direct material, direct labor, subcontract labor and allocable indirect costs. All unallocable indirect costs and corporate general and administrative costs are charged to the periods as incurred. However, in the event a loss on a contract is foreseen, the Company will recognize the loss when such loss is determined. A contract is considered complete when accepted by the customer. The Company quotes its customers the total costs of product installation and materials minus the expected rebates, if any, from a given utility. For projects larger than $10,000, rebates must be pre-approved by the utility.

(c) Going Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of September 30, 2017, whileMarch 31, 2019, the Company hascompany had a working capital surplusdeficit of $568,067, the$2,123,215, insufficient cash resources to meet its planned business objectives, and accumulated losses from operations aggregated $11,064,096 and it continues to experience operating losses.of $18,236,340. The Company intends to fund operations through equity and debt financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements through September 2018.


12 months from the date of issuance. As a result, the Company is seeking additional funding through debt and equity financing arrangements, or other funding opportunities.

The CompanyCompany's success is dependent upon, among other things, obtaining the additional financing to continue operations and to execute its business plan. In response to these problems, management intends to raise additional funds through public or private placement offerings. No assurances can be made that management will be successful in pursuing any of these strategies.


These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’sCompany's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


(d) Share-Based Payments

Certain employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company participate in incentive plans that provide for granting stock options and performance-based awards. Time based stock options generally vest in equal increments over a two -year period and expire on the third anniversary following the date of grant. Performance-based stock options vest once the applicable performance conditions are satisfied.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation for equity awards granted to employees, officers, directors and consultants as compensation and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation is recognized over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period. For performance-based stock options, compensation is recognized once the applicable performance condition is satisfied.


Plan of Operation

The Company's anticipated plan of operation is to continue to (1) identify and train sales personnel in regions of the country that have advantageous utility company rebate programs, (2) identify and train lighting installation personnel where we have established sales personnel, (3) seek out the best current and incipient solutions in the Energy Efficiency marketplace and become a reseller of those solutions, (4) develop our own solutions for the EE marketplace, and (5) seek to acquire other businesses in the market where such acquisitions makes strategic sense and are accretive to earnings.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensationcontinues to expand its solutions portfolio for equity awards grantedboth indoor and outdoor applications to capitalize on the evolving and growing market for intelligent networked systems that collect and exchange data to increase efficiency as selling, generalwell as provide a host of other economic benefits resulting from data analytics to better enable smart buildings and administrative expensesmart cities. The transition to solid-state lighting provides the opportunity for lighting to be integrated with other building automation systems to create an optimal platform for enabling the “Internet of Things” (IoT), which will support the advancement of smart buildings, smart cities, and the smart grid.

The Company's ability to grow its incipient operations is primarily dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital, most likely through the sale of additional shares of the Company's common stock or other securities. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be able raise additional capital on terms that are acceptable to the Company, or at all.

The realization of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.


The fair value of restricted stock awardsnext twelve months is equal toimportant in the closing priceexecution of the Company’splan of operations. However, if the Company cannot raise additional capital by issuing capital stock on the date of grant multiplied by the number of shares awarded. Stock-based compensation is recognized over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers, or ASU 2014-09. Pursuant to this update, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goodscash, or services. The amendmentsthrough obtaining commercial or bank financing, in this update are currently effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, and are to be applied retrospectively, or on a modified retrospective basis. Early application is not permitted. In July 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, or ASU 2014-15. ASU 2014-15 explicitly requires a company’s management to assess an entity’s abilityorder to continue as a going concern, andthe Company may have to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. The new standard became effective in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016. Management has evaluated the potential impactcurtail or cease its operations. As of the adoptiondate of this standard and believes its adoption hasReport, there were no material impactformal or informal agreements to attain such financing. The Company cannot assure any investor that, if needed, sufficient financing can be obtained or, if obtained, that it will be on reasonable terms. Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for operations to continue.

Critical Accounting Policies

There have been no changes to our consolidated statements of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In July 2015,critical accounting policies from those included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, (“ASU 2015-11”), Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015-11 requires an entity to measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The amendment does not apply to inventory that is measured using the last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. For public entities, ASU 2015-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning afteryear ended December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied prospectively. Management has evaluated the impact of the adoption of this standard and believes its adoption has no material impact on our consolidated statements of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On February 24, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases31, 2018 filed with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continueSEC on September 4, 2020.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

We are required to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. Lessoradopt certain new accounting is similarpronouncements. See Note 2 to the current model but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model. Lessors will continue to classify leases as operating, direct financing or sales-type leases. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on ourcondensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.


On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies various aspects related to the accounting and presentation of share-based payments. The amendments require entities to record all tax effects related to share-based payments at settlement or expiration through the income statement and the windfall tax benefit to be recorded when it arises, subject to normal valuation allowance considerations. All tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are required to be reported as operating activitiesincluded in the statement of cash flows. The updates relating to the income tax effects of the share-based payments including the cash flow presentation may be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. Further, the amendments allow the entities to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. If an election is made, the change to recognize forfeitures as they occur must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. AdoptionItem 1 of this standard did not have any effect on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Form 10-Q.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


None.

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements or issued guarantees to third parties.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Not applicable.


Item 4. Controls and Procedures


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sCommission's rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’sissuer's management, including the principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.


We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report.

Based upon that evaluation we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this report due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which is described below.


Our management identified the following material weaknesses which are indicative of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.


Althoughguidelines although we plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we hope

The Company has not had sufficient internal accounting personnel working at their corporate office which has led to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequatea lack of segregation of duties and ineffective risk management;timely closing processes, nor did we perform an effective assessment of our system of internal control. The accounting functions have been handled by a combination of third parties off-site and (ii) adopt sufficient written policiesinternal personnel which has hindered the Company’s ability to timely reconcile its accounts, maintain the proper controls under the underlying documentation and procedures forclose its books and records. This was a result of the early stage in the Company's growth. The Company will be adding internal accounting and financial reporting.personnel in 2020 which should allow the Company to start to remediate its internal control issues. The remediation efforts set outCompany also hired a GAAP experienced consulting firm in (i) and (ii) are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.


January 2020.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There was no changehave not been any changes in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting that occurred(as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarterthree-month period ended March 31, 2019 that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sour internal controlcontrols over financial reporting.





PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1. Legal Proceedings


Other than described below, we know of no pending legal proceedings to which we are a party which are material or potentially material, either individually or in the aggregate. We are from time to time, during the normal course of our business operations, subject to various litigation claims and legal disputes. We do not believe that the ultimate disposition of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

On SeptemberJune 26, 2016, the CompanyRegistrant filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida a Complaint against defendants The Mazzal Trust, Nissim S. Trabelsi and Shawn Telsi (collectively the “Defendants”), seeking the disgorgement of profits obtained by Defendants and certain of their shareholder affiliates defined under Rule 16a-1(a)(1) under the Exchange Act defined below (collectively, the “Group”) through “short swing profits” in violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Specifically, the CompanyRegistrant alleged that the Group acted under the guidance and control of the Defendants, whose individual defendants had filed forms 3 and 4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”, declaring themselves to be “insiders” for the purpose of Section 16(b). The Group owned 100% of the shares of the CompanyRegistrant at the time that members of the group were engaged in the sale and purchase of such shares. The sales and purchases referenced all occurred with sixthree months of other sales and purchases, subjecting Defendants to disgorge to the CompanyRegistrant all profits made by the Group in such sales and purchases. As detailed in paragraphs 16-22 of the Complaint, the total profits received by the Group is $1,695,689. Accordingly, the CompanyRegistrant has demanded the return of all such profits to Registrant plus the statutory payment of attorneys’ fees.

On August 24, 2017, the court grantedPlaintiff received a Clerk’s Entry of Default against Nissim Trabelsi. The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment for damages against Trabelsi on June 13, 2017, which to date has not been addressed by the CompanyCourt. On March 5, 2018, Nissim Trabelsi filed a default judgment against Defendants.notice of bankruptcy. The Company intendsPlaintiff is still pursuing its options in the Case and the Court has yet to vigorously pursue satisfaction of this judgment although there can be no assurance ofaddress the recovery of any funds from Defendants.


On January 26, 2017,service issues with the Company received an email from its transfer agent at that time, VStock Transfer, LLC, (“VStock”) informing the Company that it had been served with a Summons and Complaint (B2 Opportunity Fund (“B2”) v. Trabelsi et al. - Index No.:17-CV-10043, the “Claim”) and further stating that the Company was obligated to indemnify VStock for fees and expenses incurred in defending the Claim.  The Company responded on February 24, 2017 stating that (1) we reviewed the Transfer Agent and Registrar Agreement between Mazzal and VStock dated May 20, 2014 and that in Article VI(c) of that agreement it states that indemnification will not be offered if the acts of VStock constitute bad faith or gross negligence, (2) we reviewed the lawsuit filed by B2 against VStock and others and find that VStock’s actions constitute gross negligence and perhaps bad faith, and we therefore deny indemnification of VStock relating to the Claim, and (3) should VStock take any action to seek indemnification by Znergy in any manner, Znergy will either join B2 in its lawsuit or will file an action on its own. The Company terminated its agreement with VStock. Management cannot at this time estimate what, if any, financial impact this matter will have on the Company.

Trust.

Item 5. Other Information.


Amendment of Articles of Incorporation; Name Change; Status

On May 31, 2016, the Company filed a definitive information statement on Schedule 14C to provide information to the Company’s stockholders relating to an action taken by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation to change the name of the Company from Mazzal Holding Company to Znergy, Inc. The Board of Directors of the Company approved the amendment and name change and recommended the amendment to the shareholders of the Company. On May 13, 2016, the holders of 94,498,335 shares of the Company’s common stock, constituting approximately 52.48% of the outstanding shares, approved the amendment and the name change. On July 15, 2016, the Company filed its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada to effectuate the name change.


None



Item 6. Exhibits


(a)          Exhibits


Exhibit No.

 

Description

3.1

 

3.2

 

3.3

 

10.1

 

10.2

 

10.3

 

10.4

 

10.5

 

10.6

 

31.1

 
31.2

32.1

 
32.1
32.2

101 INS

 

XBRL Instance Document*

101 INSSCH

 

XBRL InstanceSchema Document*

101 SCHCAL

 XBRL Schema Document*
101 CAL

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*

101 DEF

 

XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*

101 LAB

 

XBRL Labels Linkbase Document*

101 PRE

 

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*

   




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



ZNERGY, INC.


By: /s/ Dave Baker

  

Dave Baker

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 14, 2017July 22, 2021

 


25

By: /s/ Christopher J. Floyd
Christopher J. Floyd
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 14, 2017

20