UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATESWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

2014

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from___________ to___________from__________to___________

Commission file number 333-90052
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
WISCONSIN
(State
 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
47-0871001
(I.R.S. (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
111 North Washington Street
Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301
(920) 430-1400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o      Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of August 5, 2013July 31, 2014 there were 4,227,6224,114,846 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.
 
 
 

 


Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION PAGE
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements:
  
 Item 1.Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013
3
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
4
 
     
  Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012
3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
5
 
  
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 20132014 (unaudited)
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
6
7
 
  
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
8-26
 7
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
27-51
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
52
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
52
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
  
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Legal Proceedings
Risk Factors
8-26
52
52
 
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations27-50
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk51
Item 4.Controls and Procedures51
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Legal Proceedings51
Item 1A.Risk Factors51
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
51
52
 
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
51
52
 
 
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Other Information
Exhibits
Signatures
51
52
52
53
53-57
 
Item 5.Other Information51
Item 6.Exhibits52
Signatures52

 
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements:FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 
June 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
  
December 31, 2012
(Audited)
  
June 30, 2014
(Unaudited)
  
December 31, 2013
(Audited)
 
Assets            
Cash and due from banks $7,511  $26,988  $21,235  $26,556 
Interest-earning deposits  27,998   54,516   60,270   119,364 
Federal funds sold  637   499   4,083   1,058 
Cash and cash equivalents  36,146   82,003   85,588   146,978 
Certificates of deposit in other banks  1,960   -   7,144   1,960 
Securities available for sale (“AFS”)  129,988   55,901   143,655   127,515 
Other investments  7,531   5,221   8,056   7,982 
Loans held for sale  3,142   7,323   3,589   1,486 
Loans  840,546   552,601   860,086   847,358 
Allowance for loan losses  (7,658)  (7,120)  (9,642)  (9,232)
Loans, net  832,888   545,481   850,444   838,126 
Premises and equipment, net  29,224   19,602   28,617   29,845 
Bank owned life insurance  23,352   18,697   26,980   23,796 
Accrued interest receivable and other assets  24,209   11,027   19,699   21,115 
Total assets $1,088,440  $745,255  $1,173,772  $1,198,803 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                
Liabilities:                
Demand $150,460  $108,234  $190,464  $171,321 
Money market and NOW accounts  387,378   322,507   451,791   492,499 
Savings  90,201   46,907   112,232   97,601 
Time  280,044   138,445   256,634   273,413 
Total deposits  908,083   616,093   1,011,121   1,034,834 
Short-term borrowings  33,231   4,035   3,399   7,116 
Notes payable  25,040   35,155   27,299   32,422 
Junior subordinated debentures  12,029   6,186   12,228   12,128 
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities  8,730   6,408   11,588   7,424 
Total liabilities  987,113   667,877   1,065,635   1,093,924 
                
Stockholders’ Equity:                
Preferred equity  24,400   24,400   24,400   24,400 
Common stock  42   34   41   42 
Additional paid-in capital  49,147   36,243   47,746   49,616 
Retained earnings  26,575   14,973   34,784   30,138 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”)  1,140   1,683   1,096   666 
Total Nicolet Bankshares Inc. stockholders’ equity  101,304   77,333 
Total Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. stockholders’ equity  108,067   104,862 
Noncontrolling interest  23   45   70   17 
Total stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interest  101,327   77,378   108,137   104,879 
        
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interest and stockholders’ equity $1,088,440  $745,255  $1,173,772  $1,198,803 
        
Preferred shares authorized (no par value)  10,000,000   10,000,000   10,000,000   10,000,000 
Preferred shares issued  24,400   24,400   24,400   24,400 
Common shares authorized (par value $0.01 per share)  30,000,000   30,000,000   30,000,000   30,000,000 
Common shares outstanding  4,227,622   3,425,413   4,147,226   4,241,044 
Common shares issued  4,279,745   3,479,888   4,196,670   4,303,407 
 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 
ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except share and per share data) (Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  2014  2013  2014  2013 
Interest income:                        
Loans, including loan fees $9,828  $6,530  $16,609  $12,986  $11,616  $9,828  $22,623  $16,609 
Investment securities:                                
Taxable  278   157   405   319   415   278   833   405 
Non-taxable  187   205   360   419   170   187   343   360 
Other interest income  65   51   145   123   128   65   263   145 
Total interest income
  10,358   6,943   17,519   13,847   12,329   10,358   24,062   17,519 
Interest expense:                                
Money market and NOW accounts  463   398   977   804   572   463   1,165   977 
Savings and time deposits  562   747   1,049   1,713   793   562   1,481   1,049 
Short term borrowings  6   1   7   2   4   6   7   7 
Junior subordinated debentures  165   125   289   250   218   165   435   289 
Notes payable  344   338   627  ��675   246   344   498   627 
Total interest expense
  1,540   1,609   2,949   3,444   1,833   1,540   3,586   2,949 
Net interest income
  8,818   5,334   14,570   10,403   10,496   8,818   20,476   14,570 
Provision for loan losses  975   1,125   1,950   2,375   675   975   1,350   1,950 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  7,843   4,209   12,620   8,028   9,821   7,843   19,126   12,620 
Noninterest income:                                
Service charges on deposit accounts  470   280   754   567   544   470   1,038   754 
Trust services fee income  1,074   724   1,876   1,454   1,119   1,074   2,224   1,876 
Mortgage income  714   671   1,586   1,408   431   714   646   1,586 
Brokerage fee income  115   81   217   165   166   115   326   217 
Gain on sale of assets, net  45   237   49   383 
Bank owned life insurance  212   183   381   336   220   212   434   381 
Rent income  274   240   524   480   288   274   588   524 
Investment advisory fees  76   85   162   171   102   76   212   162 
Gain (loss) on sale or writedown of assets, net  (442)  45   308   49 
Bargain purchase gain  10,435   -   10,435   -   -   10,435   -   10,435 
Other  351   176   538   337   452   351   864   538 
Total noninterest income
  13,766   2,677   16,522   5,301   2,880   13,766   6,640   16,522 
Noninterest expense:                                
Salaries and employee benefits  5,555   3,393   9,114   6,666   5,384   5,555   10,679   9,114 
Occupancy, equipment and office  1,466   1,102   2,570   2,241   1,737   1,466   3,635   2,570 
Business development and marketing  473   352   898   697   537   473   1,072   898 
Data processing  572   410   995   812   775   572   1,529   995 
FDIC assessments
  130   138   240   274   203   130   387   240 
Core deposit intangible amortization  286   168   434   336   315   286   650   434 
Other  1,104   446   1,675   768   533   1,104   1,120   1,675 
Total noninterest expense
  9,586   6,009   15,926   11,794   9,484   9,586   19,072   15,926 
                                
Income before income tax expense
  12,023   877   13,216   1,535   3,217   12,023   6,694   13,216 
Income tax expense  547   232   966   375   641   547   1,873   966 
Net income  11,476   645   12,250   1,160   2,576   11,476   4,821   12,250 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  19   13   38   26 
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  22   19   53   38 
Net income attributable to Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.  11,457   632   12,212   1,134   2,554   11,457   4,768   12,212 
Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion  305   305   610   610 
Less: preferred stock dividends  61   305   122   610 
Net income available to common shareholders
 $11,152  $327  $11,602  $524  $2,493  $11,152  $4,646  $11,602 
                                
Basic earnings per common share $2.79  $0.09  $3.12  $0.16  $0.59  $2.79  $1.10  $3.12 
Diluted earnings per common share $2.78  $0.09  $3.11  $0.16  $0.58  $2.78  $1.08  $3.11 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                                
Basic  3,999,732   3,452,209   3,717,627   3,466,282   4,212,174   3,999,732   4,227,446   3,717,627 
Diluted  4,008,426   3,463,137   3,728,599   3,481,791   4,332,016   4,008,426   4,312,005   3,728,599 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2013  2012  2013  2012 
Net income $11,476  $645  $12,250  $1,160 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:                
Securities available for sale:                
Net unrealized holding gains/(losses) arising during the period  (1,645)  119   (1,130)  633 
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains)/losses realized in net income  239   (232)  239   (440)
Net unrealized gains/losses on securities before tax expense  (1,406)  (113)  (891)  193 
Income tax expense/(benefit)  549   39   348   (65)
Total other comprehensive income  (857)  (74)  (543)  128 
Comprehensive income $10,619  $571  $11,707  $1,288 
                 
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2014  2013  2014  2013 
Net income $2,576  $11,476  $4,821  $12,250 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                
Securities available for sale:                
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period  446   (1,645  1,045   (1,130)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses realized in net income  -   239   (341  239 
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities before tax expense  446   (1,406  704   (891)
Income tax (expense) benefit  (173)  549   (274  348 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)  273   (857  430   (543)
Comprehensive income $2,849  $10,619  $5,251  $11,707 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:

NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
  Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity       
                      
  Preferred
Equity
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-In Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income  
 
 
Noncontrolling
Interest
  
 
 
 
Total
 
Balance December 31, 2013 $24,400  $42  $49,616  $30,138  $666  $17  $104,879 
Comprehensive income:                            
Net income  -   -   -   4,768   -   53   4,821 
Other comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   430   -   430 
Stock compensation expense  -   -   306   -   -   -   306 
Exercise of stock options  -   -   298   -   -   -   298 
Issuance of common stock  -   -   29   -   -   -   29 
Purchase and retirement of common stock  -   (1)  (2,503)  -   -   -   (2,504)
Preferred stock dividends
  -   -   -   (122)  -   -   (122)
Balance, June 30, 2014 $24,400  $41  $47,746  $34,784  $1,096  $70  $108,137 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated StatementStatements of Stockholders’ EquityCash Flows
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
                            
  Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity       
  Preferred
Equity
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  
 
 
Noncontrolling
Interest
  
 
 
 
Total
 
Balance, December 31, 2012 $24,400  $34  $36,243  $14,973  $1,683  $45  $77,378 
Comprehensive income  -   -   -   12,212   (543)  38   11,707 
Stock compensation expense  -   -   342   -   -   -   342 
Exercise of stock options  -   -   206   -   -   -   206 
Purchase and retirement of common stock  -   -   (63)  -   -   -   (63)
Common stock issued, net of capitalized issuance costs of $401  -   8   12,419   -   -   -   12,427 
Preferred stock dividends  -   -   -   (610)  -   -   (610)
Distribution from noncontrolling interest  -   -   -   -   -   (60)  (60)
Balance, June 30, 2013 $24,400  $42  $49,147  $26,575  $1,140  $23  $101,327 
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2014  2013 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:      
Net income $4,821  $12,250 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion  1,796   1,985 
Provision for loan losses  1,350   1,950 
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance  (434)  (381)
Stock compensation expense  306   342 
Gain on sale or writedown of assets, net  (308)  (49)
Gain on sale of loans held for sale, net  (646)  (1,586)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale  31,322   95,965 
Origination of loans held for sale  (32,779)  (90,198)
Bargain purchase gain  -   (10,435)
Net change in:        
Accrued interest receivable and other assets  270   366 
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities  (1,136)  1,354 
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,562   11,563 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:        
Net increase in certificates of deposit in other banks  (5,184)  - 
Net increase in loans  (13,800)  (19,689)
Purchases of securities AFS  (23,107)  (8,711)
Proceeds from sales of securities AFS  4,021   43,945 
Proceeds from calls and maturities of securities AFS  8,276   8,089 
Purchase of other investments  (74)  (8)
Purchase of premises and equipment  (778)  (1,246)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment  7   - 
Proceeds from sales of other real estate and other assets  2,159   993 
Purchase of bank owned life insurance  (2,750)  - 
Net cash received in business combination  -   13,898 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities  (31,230)  37,271 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Net decrease in deposits  (23,583)  (54,152)
Net change in short-term borrowings  (3,717)  3,091 
Repayments of notes payable  (5,123)  (45,809)
Purchase and retirement of common stock  (2,504)  (63)
Stock issuance costs  -   (401)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net  29   3,107 
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options  298   206 
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture  -   (60)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock  (122)  (610)
Net cash used by financing activities  (34,722)  (94,691)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (61,390)  (45,857)
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Beginning $146,978  $82,003 
Ending $85,588  $36,146 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:        
Cash paid for interest $3,761  $2,241 
Cash paid for taxes  2,060   1,018 
Transfer of loans and bank premises to other real estate owned  1,061   2,116 
Acquisitions:        
Fair value of assets acquired  -   435,692 
Fair value of liabilities assumed  -   415,067 
Net assets acquired  -   20,625 
         
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements Continued:
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
         
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2013  2012 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:      
Net income $12,250  $1,160 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
     Depreciation, amortization, and accretion  1,985   1,233 
     Provision for loan losses  1,950   2,375 
     Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance  (381)  (336)
     Stock compensation expense  342   241 
     Gain on sale of assets, net  (49)  (383)
     Gain on sale of loans held for sale, net  (1,586)  (1,408)
     Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale  95,965   90,266 
     Origination of loans held for sale  (90,198)  (81,727)
     Bargain purchase gain  (10,435)  - 
     Net change in:        
          Accrued interest receivable and other assets  366   256 
  Accrued interest payable and other liabilities  1,354   2,489 
          Net cash provided by operating activities
  11,563   14,166 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:        
Net decrease in certificates of deposit in other banks  -   248 
Net increase in loans  (19,689)  (47,901)
Purchases of securities available for sale  (8,711)  (11,830)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale  43,945   5,415 
Proceeds from calls and maturities of securities available for sale  8,089   3,692 
Purchase of other investments  (8)  (2)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance  -   (3,750)
Purchase of premises and equipment  (1,246)  (1,632)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and other assets  993   877 
Net cash received in business combination  13,898   - 
          Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
  37,271   (54,883)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Net decrease in deposits  (54,152)  (11,641)
Net change in short term borrowings  3,091   (2,451)
Proceeds from notes payable  -   3,800 
Repayments of notes payable  (45,809)  (108)
Purchase of common stock  (63)  (814)
Stock issuance costs  (401)  - 
Issuance of common stock  3,107   - 
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options  206   - 
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture  (60)  (100)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock  (610)  (610)
          Net cash used by financing activities
  (94,691)  (11,924)
        Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  (45,857)  (52,641)
Cash and cash equivalents:        
Beginning $82,003  $92,129 
Ending $36,146  $39,488 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:        
 Cash paid for interest $2,241  $3,477 
 Cash paid for taxes  1,018   726 
 Transfer of loans to other real estate owned  2,116   1,169 
 Acquisition:        
   Fair value of assets acquired  435,692   - 
   Fair value of liabilities assumed  415,067   - 
   Net assets acquired  20,625   - 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.        
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

General

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, consolidated balance sheets, and statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All material intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted or abbreviated. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 which is contained in the Joint Proxy Statement-Prospectus dated March 26, 2013, as filed with the Securities2013.

Critical Accounting Policies and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) on March 27, 2013.Estimates

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, the allowance for loan losses, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, fair value of financial instruments, deferred tax assets, uncertain income tax positions and contingencies. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change for the Company include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, and the assessment of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the valuation of loans acquired in the 2013 acquisitions; therefore, these are critical accounting policies.  Management does not anticipate any material changes to estimates in the near term. Factors that may cause sensitivity to the aforementioned estimates include but are not limited to: external market factors such as market interest rates and employment rates, changes to operating policies and procedures, and changes in applicable banking regulations.regulations, and changes to deferred tax estimates within the first twelve months after acquisition as allowed by purchase accounting guidelines. Actual results may ultimately differ from estimates, although management does not generally believe such differences would materially affect the consolidated financial statements in any individual reporting period presented.

The following information relatedThere have been no material changes or developments with respect to the assumptions or methodologies that the Company uses when applying what management believes are critical accounting policies has been expanded within this document to includeand developing critical accounting estimates as disclosed in the discussionCompany’s Annual Report on policies which were impacted byForm 10-K for the acquisition.year ended December 31, 2013.

Business Combinations and Method ofRecent Accounting for Loans AcquiredDevelopments Adopted

The Company accounts forhas implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its acquisitions under Financial Accounting Standards Boardconsolidated financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Note 2 – Acquisitions

Bank of Wausau: On August 9, 2013, Nicolet National Bank entered into an agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FASB”FDIC”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use, purchasing selected Bank of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiableWausau assets and liabilities acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses relatedassuming all of its deposits, in a transaction that was effective immediately. The financial position and results of operations of Bank of Wausau prior to the acquired loans is recorded on theits acquisition date because the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows.
Acquired loans are recorded at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date, and are initially classified as either purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans (i.e. loans that reflect credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at acquisition that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments) or purchased non-impaired loans. PCI loans are accounted for under the accounting guidance for loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality, found in FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, formerly American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (SOP) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.  The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows for each loan or pool of loans meeting the criteria above, and determines the excess of the loan’s scheduled contractual
principal and contractual interest payments over all cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition as an amount that shouldwere not be accreted.   These credit discounts (“nonaccretable marks”) are included in the determinationaccompanying consolidated financial statements. The FDIC-assisted transaction carried no loss-share provisions. With the addition of initial fair value for acquired loans; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. Differences between the estimated fair values and expected cash flowsBank of acquired loans at the acquisition date that are not credit-based (“accretable marks”) are subsequently accreted to interest income over the estimated lifeWausau’s one branch, Nicolet National Bank operates two branches in Wausau, WI. As of the loans using a method that approximates a level yield method if the timing and amount of the future cash flows is reasonably estimable.
Subsequent to the acquisition date for PCI loans, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized prospectively as interest income. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized through the provision for loan losses.
Loans acquired through business combinations that do not meet the specific criteria of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, but for which a discount is attributable at least in part to credit quality, are also accounted for under this guidance. All fair value discounts on acquired loans were deemed to be credit related at acquisition in the Mid-Wisconsin merger.  The nonaccretable difference represents cash flows not expected to be collected. Subsequently, based on re-evaluation of cash flows and facts available, some nonaccretable differences may be reclassified to accretable.
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses related to PCI loans is based on an analysis that is performed each period to estimate the expected cash flows for each loan deemed PCI. To the extent that the expected cash flows of a PCI loan have decreased since the acquisition date, the Company establishes or increasestransaction added approximately $47 million in assets at fair value, including mostly cash as well as $9.4 million of investments and $12.5 million in loans, of which $1.4 million were classified as Purchase Credit Impaired (“PCI”) loans. Of the allowance for loan losses.
For acquired loans that are not deemed credit impaired at acquisition, credit discounts representing$42 million of deposits assumed, $18 million were immediately repriced rate-sensitive certificates of deposit which were subsequently redeemed in full by September 30, 2013. Given the principal losses expected over the lifenature and rates of the loan are a componentremaining deposits assumed, no core deposit intangible was recorded. The third quarter of the initial fair value. Subsequent to the purchase date, the methods utilized to estimate the required allowance for loan losses for these loans is similar to originated loans.  The remaining differences between the purchase price and the unpaid principal balance at the date of2013 included approximately $0.2 million pre-tax acquisition are recorded in interest income over the economic life of the loans.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. These temporary differences are multiplied by the enacted income tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes become payable or receivable. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if necessary, by the amount of such benefits that are not expected to be realized based on available evidence.  At acquisition, deferred taxes were evaluated in respect to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (including the acquired net operating losses),costs and a net deferred tax asset was recorded.  Certain limitations within the provisions of the tax code are placed on the amount of net operating losses which can be utilized as part of acquisition accounting rules and were incorporated into the calculation of the deferred tax asset.  In addition, a portion of the fair market value discounts on PCI loans which resolve in the first twelve months after the acquisition may be disallowed under provisions of the tax code.$2.4 million pre-tax bargain purchase gain.
 
Note 2 – AcquisitionAcquisitions, continued

Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”):On April 26, 2013, the Company consummated its acquisition of Mid-Wisconsin, Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company and Mid-Wisconsin dated November 28, 2012, as amended January 17, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”), whereby Mid-Wisconsin was merged with and into the Company, and Mid-Wisconsin Bank, Mid-Wisconsin’s wholly owned commercial bank subsidiary serving central Wisconsin, was merged with and into Nicolet National Bank. The system integration was completed, and the eleven branches of Mid-Wisconsin opened on April 29, 2013 as Nicolet National Bank branches, doubling the Bank’s footprint to 22 branch locations.branches.

The purpose of the merger was for strategic reasons beneficial to the Company. The acquisition is consistent with its growth plans to build a community bank of sufficient size to flourish in various economic environments, serve its expanded customer base with a wide variety of products and services, and effectively and efficiently meet growing regulatory compliance and capital requirements. The Company believes it is well-positioned to achieve stronger financial performance and enhance shareholder value through synergies of the combined operations.
 
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the outstanding shares of Mid-Wisconsin common stock, other than dissenting shares as defined in the merger agreement, were converted into the right to receive 0.3727 shares of Company common stock (and in lieu of any fractional share of Company common stock, $16.50 in cash) per share of Mid-Wisconsin common stock or, for record holders of 200 or fewer shares of Mid-Wisconsin common stock, $6.15 in cash per share of Mid-Wisconsin common stock. As a result, the total value of the consideration to Mid-Wisconsin shareholders was $10.2 million, consisting of $0.5 million in cash and 589,159 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company’s common stock was valued at $16.50 per share, which was the value assigned in the merger agreement and considered to be the fair value of the stock on the date of the acquisition. Concurrently with the merger, the Company also closed a private placement of 174,016 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $16.50 per share, for an aggregate of $2.9 million in proceeds. Approximately $401,000$0.4 million in direct stock issuance costs for the merger and private placement were incurred and charged against additional paid in capital. Also as a condition of the merger, Mid-Wisconsin redeemed by the closing of the merger its preferred stock (issued to the Department of U.S. Treasury (“UST”) as part of its participation in the federal government’s Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) with par value of $10.5 million) plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon.

The Company accounted for the transaction under the acquisition method of accounting, and thus, the financial position and results of operations of Mid-Wisconsin prior to the consummation date were not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The accounting required assets purchased and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of core deposit intangibles, securities, premises and equipment, loans, OREO, deposits, debt and deferred taxes with the assistance of third party valuations, appraisals, and third party advisors.  The estimated fair values will bewere subject to refinement as additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomesbecame available through the measurement period of approximately one year from consummation. During the fourth quarter of 2013, there were developments related to an ongoing legal matter acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction. Such litigation was pre-existing at the time of acquisition. The events in the fourth quarter supported a change in estimate of loss on this litigation to $0.9 million, net of tax, which was recorded against the bargain purchase gain of the Mid-Wisconsin transaction and imposed back against 2013 third quarter earnings. No other adjustments to the bargain purchase gain have been recorded.

TheAs of the acquisition date, the transaction added approximately $436 million in assets at fair value, including cash and investments of the assets acquired$133 million, $272 million in loans, of which $15 million were classified as PCI loans, $4 million of core deposit intangible; and liabilities assumed on April 26, 2013 was as follows:
               
 (in millions) As recorded by
Mid-Wisconsin
  Fair Value
Adjustments
   As recorded
by Nicolet
 
Cash, cash equivalents and securities available for sale $134  $(1)  $133 
Loans,net  284   (12)   272 
Other real estate owned  5   (3)   2 
Core deposit intangible  -   4    4 
Premises, equipment, and other assets  17   7 (1)  24 
Total assets acquired $440  $(5)  $435 
              
Deposits $345  $1   $346 
Junior subordinated debentures, borrowings and other liabilities  72   (3)(2)  69 
Total liabilities acquired $417  $(2)  $415 
              
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities acquired $23  $(3)  $20 
Less: purchase price          $10 
Bargain purchase gain          $10 
(1) Includes premises and equipment adjustment$27 million of $2other assets. Deposits of $346 million and deferred tax asset of $5 million.
(2) Includes borrowings adjustment increase of $2 million andjunior subordinated debentures, adjustment decreaseborrowings and other liabilities of $5$70 million were acquired in the merger. The excess of assets over liabilities acquired of $20 million less the purchase price of $10 million resulted in a bargain purchase gain of $10 million.

Proforma results for 2014 periods are not necessary as the 2014 actual results fully include both 2013 acquisitions. The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations for three months ended andthe six months ended June 30, 2013, and 2012, as if the acquisitionacquisitions had occurred January 1 of eachthat year. The Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts. These unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes and are not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined company that would have been achieved had the acquisitionacquisitions occurred at the beginning of each period presented, nor are they intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations.
      
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 June 30, 2013  June 30, 2012  June 30, 2013  June 30, 2012  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)               
Total revenues, net of interest expense $23,709  $12,581  $36,681  $24,911  $34,117 
Net income  10,599   (539)  11,247   (240)  11,413 
 
Note 3 – Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock awards (outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock), if any. Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per common share.
      
 Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,  
Three Months Ended
 June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
 June 30,
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  2014  2013  2014  2013 
(In thousands except per share data)                        
Net income, net of noncontrolling interest $11,457  $632  $12,212  $1,134  $2,554  $11,457  $4,768  $12,212 
Less: preferred stock dividends  305   305   610   610   61   305   122   610 
Net income available to common shareholders $11,152  $327  $11,602  $524  $2,493  $11,152  $4,646  $11,602 
Weighted average common shares outstanding  4,000   3,452   3,718   3,466   4,212   4,000   4,227   3,718 
Effect of dilutive stock instruments  8   11   11   16   120   8   85   11 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  4,008   3,463   3,729   3,482   4,332   4,008   4,312   3,729 
Basic earnings per common share* $2.79  $0.09  $3.12  $0.16  $0.59  $2.79  $1.10  $3.12 
Diluted earnings per common share* $2.78  $0.09  $3.11  $0.16  $0.58  $2.78  $1.08  $3.11 

*Cumulative quarterly per share performance may not equal annual per share totals due to the effects of the amount and timing of capital increases. When computing earnings per share for an interim period, the denominator is based on the weighted-average shares outstanding during the interim period, and not on an annualized weighted-average basis. Accordingly, the sum of the quarters’ earnings per share data will not necessarily equal the year to date earnings per share data.

Options to purchase approximately 0.3 million and 0.5 million shares were outstanding at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, but were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Note 4 – Stock-based compensationCompensation

Activity ofin the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans is summarized in the following tables:
             
Stock Options
  Weighted-
Average Fair
Value of Options
Granted
  
 
Option Shares
Outstanding
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
  
 
 
Exercisable
Shares
  Weighted-
Average Fair
Value of Options
Granted
  
 
Option Shares
Outstanding
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
  
 
 
Exercisable Shares
 
Balance – December 31, 2011     702,907  $17.78   533,074 
Granted $4.87   184,625   16.50     
Exercise of stock options      (25,750)  12.50     
Forfeited      (36,250)  16.84     
Balance – December 31, 2012Balance – December 31, 2012      825,532   17.70   548,623      825,532  $17.70   548,623 
Granted Granted  -   -   -       -   -   -     
Exercise of stock options Exercise of stock options      (15,625)  13.20           (23,625)  12.96     
Forfeited Forfeited      (3,000)  12.50           (8,750)  15.78     
Balance – June 30, 2013      806,907  $17.80   567,985 
Balance – December 31, 2013      793,157   17.86   600,846 
Granted  -   -   -     
Exercise of stock options      (18,215)  16.35     
Forfeited      (4,750)  16.65     
Balance – June 30, 2014      770,192  $17.90   614,243 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2013 are exercisable at option prices ranging from $12.50 to $26.00.  There are 363,583 options outstanding in the range from $12.50 - $17.00, 396,824 options outstanding in the range from $17.01 - $22.00, and 46,500 options outstanding in the range from $22.01 - $26.00.  The exercisable options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 5 years as of June 30, 2013.
Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock options.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised in the first six months of 2013, and full year of  2012 was approximately $48,000, and $103,000, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of stock options exercisable at June 30, 2013 was $18.22.
Note 4 – Stock-based compensation,Compensation, continued
        
Restricted Stock
  Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
  Restricted
Shares
Outstanding
 
Balance – December 31, 2011 $-   - 
   Granted  16.50   54,725 
   Vested  -   - 
   Forfeited  16.50   (250)
Balance – December 31, 2012  16.50   54,475 
   Granted  16.50   10,606 
   Vested *  16.50   (12,958)
   Forfeited  -   - 
Balance – June 30, 2013 $16.50   52,123 

Options outstanding at June 30, 2014 are exercisable at option prices ranging from $12.50 to $26.00. There are 328,618 options outstanding in the range from $12.50 - $17.00, 395,574 options outstanding in the range from $17.01 - $22.00, and 46,000 options outstanding in the range from $22.01 - $26.00. At June 30, 2014, the exercisable options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 3 years and a weighted average exercise price of $18.21.

Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in the first six months of 2014, and full year of 2013 was approximately $19,000, and $80,000, respectively.
 
Restricted Stock Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value  Restricted
Shares Outstanding
 
Balance – December 31, 2012 $16.50   54,475 
Granted  16.51   26,506 
Vested*  16.50   (18,258)
Forfeited  16.50   (360)
Balance – December 31, 2013  16.50   62,363 
Granted  -   - 
Vested *  16.50   (12,919)
Forfeited  -   - 
Balance – June 30, 2014 $16.50   49,444 
         
*The terms of the restricted stock agreements permit the surrender of shares to the Company upon vesting in order to satisfy applicable tax withholding requirements at the minimum statuatorystatutory withholding rate, and 3,812accordingly 2,519 shares were surrendered accordingly during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 5,606 shares were surrendered during 2013.

The Company recognized approximately $342,000$306,000 and $241,000$342,000 of stock-based employee compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, associated with its stock equity awards. As of June 30, 2013,2014, there was approximately $1.7$1.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to equity award grants. The cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of approximately fivefour years.

Note 5- Securities Available for Sale

Amortized costs and fair values of securities available for sale are summarized as follows:
         
 June 30, 2013  June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) Amortized Cost  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross Unrealized Losses  Fair Value  Amortized Cost  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized Losses
  Fair Value 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $1,000  $1  $-  $1,001  $1,532  $6  $1  $1,537 
State, county and municipals  51,741   1,159   560   52,340   76,446   996   375   77,067 
Mortgage-backed securities  73,581   594   912   73,263   62,946   676   694   62,928 
Corporate debt securities  220   -   -   220   220   -   -   220 
Equity securities  1,576   1,588   -   3,164   715   1,188   -   1,903 
 $128,118  $3,342  $1,472  $129,988  $141,859  $2,866  $1,070  $143,655 
                                
 December 31, 2012  December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) Amortized Cost  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross Unrealized Losses  Fair Values  Amortized Cost  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Values 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $2,062  $3  $8  $2,057 
State, county and municipals $31,642  $1,079  $34  $32,687   54,594   1,058   613   55,039 
Mortgage-backed securities  19,876   803   11   20,668   68,642   585   1,348   67,879 
Corporate debt securities  220   -   -   220 
Equity securities  1,624   922   -   2,546   905   1,415   -   2,320 
 $53,142  $2,804  $45  $55,901  $126,423  $3,061  $1,969  $127,515 
 
Note 5- Securities Available for Sale, continued

The following table represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012.2013.
             
 June 30, 2013  June 30, 2014 
 Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
(in thousands) Fair Value  Unrealized Losses  Fair Value  Unrealized Losses  Fair Value  Unrealized Losses  Fair
Value
  Unrealized Losses  Fair
Value
  Unrealized Losses  Fair
Value
  Unrealized Losses 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $143  $1  $-  $-  $143  $1 
State, county and municipals $20,356  $560  $-  $-  $20,356  $560   17,281   94   12,938   281   30,219   375 
Mortgage-backed securities  47,157   912   -   -   47,157   912   2,752   20   26,753   674   29,505   694 
 $67,513  $1,472  $-  $-  $67,513  $1,472  $20,176  $115  $39,691  $955  $59,867  $1,070 
      
 December 31, 2012  December 31, 2013 
 Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total  Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total 
(in thousands) Fair Value  Unrealized Losses  Fair Value  Unrealized Losses  Fair Value  Unrealized Losses  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $511  $8  $-  $-  $511  $8 
State, county and municipals $4,250  $34  $-  $-  $4,250  $34   17,697   613   -   -   17,697   613 
Mortgage-backed securities  3,507   11   -   -   3,507   11   36,687   1,240   2,920   108   39,607   1,348 
 $7,757  $45  $-  $-  $7,757  $45  $54,895  $1,861  $2,920  $108  $57,815  $1,969 

As of June 30, 20132014, the Company does not consider securities with unrealized losses to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses in each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates, market spreads and market conditions subsequent to purchase. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its securities to maturity. There were no other-than-temporary impairments charged to earnings during the three and six month periodssix-month period ending June 30, 20132014 or 2012.2013.

The amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale at June 30, 20132014 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Fair values of securities are estimated based on financial models or prices paid for the same or similar securities. It is possible interest rates could change considerably, resulting in a material change in estimated fair value.
     
 June 30, 2013  June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) Amortized Cost  Fair Value  Amortized Cost  Fair Value 
Due in less than one year $5,263  $5,320  $5,220  $5,276 
Due in one year through five years  38,268   39,124   62,344   62,986 
Due after five years through ten years  8,835   8,522   9,549   9,471 
Due after ten years  595   595   1,085   1,091 
  52,961   53,561   78,198   78,824 
Mortgage-backed securities  73,581   73,263   62,946   62,928 
Equity securities  1,576   3,164   715   1,903 
Securities available for sale $128,118  $129,988  $141,859  $143,655 
 
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale during the first six months of 20132014 and 20122013 were approximately $43.9$4.0 million and $5.4$43.9 million, respectively. Net gains of approximately $239,000$341,000 and $440,000$239,000 were realized on sales of securities during the first six months of 2014 and 2013, and 2012.respectively.
 
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality

The loan composition as of June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 is summarized as follows.
             
  2013     2012    
(in thousands) Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial $245,856   29.3% $197,301   35.7%
Agricultural production  13,114   1.6   215   0.1 
Owner-occupied commercial real estate (“CRE”)  181,101   21.5   106,888   19.3 
Agricultural real estate  38,983   4.6   11,354   2.1 
CRE investment  117,264   14.0   76,618   13.9 
Construction & land development  37,754   4.5   21,791   3.9 
Residential construction  10,288   1.2   7,957   1.4 
Residential first mortgage  141,255   16.8   85,588   15.5 
Residential junior mortgage  48,929   5.8   39,352   7.1 
Retail & other  6,002   0.7   5,537   1.0 
    Loans  840,546   100.0%  552,601   100.0%
Less allowance for loan losses  7,658       7,120     
    Loans, net $832,888      $545,481     
Allowance for loan losses to loans  0.91%      1.29%    
  Total
  June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(in thousands) Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial $269,377   31.3% $253,674   29.9%
Owner-occupied commercial real estate (“CRE”)  187,225   21.8   187,476   22.1 
Agricultural (“AG”) production  13,982   1.6   14,256   1.7 
AG real estate  41,934   4.9   37,057   4.4 
CRE investment  79,639   9.3   90,295   10.7 
Construction & land development  45,504   5.3   42,881   5.1 
Residential construction  11,895   1.4   12,535   1.5 
Residential first mortgage  154,713   18.0   154,403   18.2 
Residential junior mortgage  50,244   5.8   49,363   5.8 
Retail & other  5,573   0.6   5,418   0.6 
Loans  860,086   100.0%  847,358   100.0%
Less allowance for loan losses  9,642       9,232     
Loans, net $850,444      $838,126     
Allowance for loan losses to loans  1.12%      1.09%    

  Originated
  June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(in thousands) Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount 
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial $242,150   37.4% $227,572 36.5%
Owner-occupied CRE  129,315   20.0   127,759 20.5 
AG production  4,653   0.7   3,230 0.5 
AG real estate  18,189   2.8   13,596 2.2 
CRE investment  50,929   7.9   60,390 9.7 
Construction & land development  34,501   5.3   30,277 4.9 
Residential construction  11,895   1.8   12,475 2.0 
Residential first mortgage  110,084   17.0   104,180 16.7 
Residential junior mortgage  40,913   6.3   39,207 6.3 
Retail & other  4,847   0.8   4,192 0.7 
Loans $647,476   100.0% $622,878 100.0%

  Acquired 
  June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
(in thousands) Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial $27,227   12.8% $26,102   11.6%
Owner-occupied CRE  57,910   27.2   59,717   26.6 
AG production  9,329   4.4   11,026   4.9 
AG real estate  23,745   11.2   23,461   10.5 
CRE investment  28,710   13.5   29,905   13.3 
Construction & land development  11,003   5.2   12,604   5.6 
Residential construction  -   -   60   0.1 
Residential first mortgage  44,629   21.0   50,223   22.4 
Residential junior mortgage  9,331   4.4   10,156   4.5 
Retail & other  726   0.3   1,226   0.5 
Loans $212,610   100.0% $224,480   100.0%

Practically all of the Company’s loans, commitments, and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in the Company’s market area. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, the credit risk in the loan portfolio is largely influenced by general economic conditions and trends of the counties and markets in which the debtors operate, and the resulting impact on the operations of borrowers or on the value of underlying collateral, if any.

The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) represents management’s estimate of probable and inherent credit losses in the Company’s loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, estimating the amount of the ALLL is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio, net charge-offs, trends in past due and impaired loans, and the level of potential problem loans, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.  To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required that could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods. Allocations to the ALLL may be made for specific loans but the entire ALLL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off or for which an actual loss is realized.
The allocation methodology used by the Company includes specific allocations for impaired loans evaluated individually for impairment based on collateral values and for the remaining loan portfolio collectively evaluated for impairment primarily based on historical loss rates and other qualitative factors.  Loan charge-offs and recoveries are based on actual amounts charged-off or recovered by loan category.  Management allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio.  Due to the short period of time since the acquisition and consistent with acquisition accounting rules, no ALLL has been recorded on acquired loans at June 30, 2013.
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) represents management’s estimate of probable and inherent credit losses in the Company’s loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, estimating the amount of the ALLL is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio, net charge-offs, trends in past due and impaired loans, and the level of potential problem loans, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required that could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods. Allocations to the ALLL may be made for specific loans but the entire ALLL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off or for which an actual loss is realized.

The allocation methodology used by the Company includes specific allocations for impaired loans evaluated individually for impairment based on collateral values and for the remaining loan portfolio collectively evaluated for impairment primarily based on historical loss rates and other qualitative factors. Loan charge-offs and recoveries are based on actual amounts charged-off or recovered by loan category. Management allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio. Due to the short period of time since the acquisitions and consistent with acquisition accounting rules, no ALLL has been recorded on acquired loans since acquisition or at June 30, 2014.
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
The following tables present the balance and activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio at or for the six months ended June 30, 2014:
                                  
  TOTAL – Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 
Commercial
& industrial
  
Owner- occupied
CRE
  AG production  AG real
estate
  
CRE
investment
  Construction & land development  Residential construction  Residential first
mortgage
  Residential junior mortgage  
Retail
& other
  Total 
Beginning balance $1,798  $766  $18  $59  $505  $4,970  $229  $544  $321  $22  $9,232 
Provision  2,007   584   26   213   62   (2,174)  (62)  411   136   147   1,350 
Charge-offs  (534)  (268)  -   -   -   (12)  -   (123)  (9)  (33)  (979)
Recoveries  10   14   -   -   8   -   -   1   -   6   39 
Net charge-offs  (524)  (254)  -   -   8   (12)  -   (122)  (9)  (27)  (940)
Ending balance $3,281  $1,096  $44  $272  $575  $2,784  $167  $833  $448  $142  $9,642 
As percent of ALLL  34.0%  11.4%  0.5%  2.8%  6.0%  28.9%  1.7%  8.6%  4.6%  1.5%  100%
                                             
ALLL:                                            
Individually evaluated $213  $-  $-  $-  $-  $420  $-  $-  $-  $-  $633 
Collectively evaluated  3,068   1,096   44   272   575   2,364   167   833   448   142   9,009 
Ending balance $3,281  $1,096  $44  $272  $575  $2,784  $167  $833  $448  $142  $9,642 
                                             
Loans:                                            
Individually evaluated $332  $1,999  $27  $459  $1,913  $4,358  $-  $1,319  $438  $-  $10,845 
Collectively evaluated  269,045   185,226   13,955   41,475   77,726   41,146   11,895   153,394   49,806   5,573   849,241 
Total loans $269,377  $187,225  $13,982  $41,934  $79,639  $45,504  $11,895  $154,713  $50,244  $5,573  $860,086 
                                             
Less ALLL $3,281  $1,096  $44  $272  $575  $2,784  $167  $833  $448  $142  $9,642 
Net loans $266,096  $186,129  $13,938  $41,662  $79,064  $42,720  $11,728  $153,880  $49,796  $5,431  $850,444 
  Originated – Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 
Commercial
& industrial
  
Owner-
occupied
CRE
  
AG
production
  AG real
estate
  
CRE
investment
  Construction & land development  
Residential
construction
  
Residential
first
mortgage
  
Residential
junior
mortgage
  
Retail
& other
  Total 
Beginning balance $1,798  $766  $18  $59  $505  $4,970  $229  $544  $321  $22  $9,232 
Provision  1,983   577   26   213   62   (2,186)  (62)  320   127   147   1,207 
Charge-offs  (510)  (252)  -   -   -   -   -   (32)  -   (33)  (827)
Recoveries  10   5   -   -   8   -   -   1   -   6   30 
Net charge-offs  (500)  (247)  -   -   8   -   -   (31)  -   (27)  (797)
Ending balance $3,281  $1,096  $44  $272  $575  $2,784  $167  $833  $448  $142  $9,642 
As percent of ALLL  34.0%  11.4%  0.5%  2.8%  6.0%  28.9%  1.7%  8.6%  4.6%  1.5%  100%
                                             
ALLL:                                            
Individually evaluated $213  $-  $-  $-  $-  $420  $-  $-  $-  $-  $633 
Collectively evaluated  3,068   1,096   44   272   575   2,364   167   833   448   142   9,009 
Ending balance $3,281  $1,096  $44  $272  $575  $2,784  $167  $833  $448  $142  $9,642 
                                             
Loans:                                            
Individually evaluated $323  $1,042  $-  $-  $-  $3,879  $-  $-  $-  $-  $5,244 
Collectively evaluated  241,827   128,273   4,653   18,189   50,929   30,622   11,895   110,084   40,913   4,847   642,232 
Total loans $242,150  $129,315  $4,653  $18,189  $50,929  $34,501  $11,895  $110,084  $40,913  $4,847  $647,476 
                                             
Less ALLL $3,281  $1,096  $44  $272  $575  $2,784  $167  $833  $448  $142  $9,642 
Net loans $238,869  $128,219  $4,609  $17,917  $50,354  $31,717  $11,728  $109,251  $40,465  $4,705  $637,834 
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
  Acquired – Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 
Commercial
& industrial
  
Owner-
occupied
CRE
  
AG
production
  AG real estate  
CRE
investment
  Construction & land development  
Residential
construction
  
Residential
first
mortgage
  
Residential
junior
mortgage
  
Retail &
other
  Total 
Provision $24  $7  $-  $-  $-  $12  $-  $91  $9  $-  $143 
Charge-offs  (24)  (16)  -   -   -   (12)  -   (91)  (9)  -   (152)
Recoveries  -   9   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   9 
Loans:                                            
Individually evaluated $9  $957  $27  $459  $1,913  $479  $-  $1,319  $438  $-  $5,601 
Collectively evaluated  27,218   56,953   9,302   23,286   26,797   10,524   -   43,310   8,893   726   207,009 
Total loans $27,227  $57,910  $9,329  $23,745  $28,710  $11,003  $-  $44,629  $9,331  $726  $212,610 
The following table presents the balance and activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment at or for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
  TOTAL – Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 
Commercial
& industrial
  
Owner- occupied
CRE
  AG production  AG real estate  
CRE
investment
  Construction & land development  Residential construction  Residential first mortgage  Residential junior mortgage  
Retail
& other
  Total 
Beginning balance $1,969  $1,069  $-  $-  $337  $2,580  $137  $685  $312  $31  $7,120 
Provision  170   259   5   12   485   802   36   128   57   (4)  1,950 
Charge-offs  (475)  (113)  -   -   (639)  (36)  -   (86)  (83)  (11)  (1,443)
Recoveries  21   2   -   -   -   -   -   6   1   1   31 
Net charge-offs  (454)  (111)  -   -   (639)  (36)  -   (80)  (82)  (10)  (1,412)
Ending balance $1,685  $1,217  $5  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
As percent of ALLL  22.0%  15.9%  0.1%  0.2%  2.4%  43.7%  2.3%  9.5%  3.7%  0.2%  100%
                                             
ALLL:                                            
Individually evaluated $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Collectively evaluated  1,685   1,217   5   12   183   3,346   173   733   287   17   7,658 
Ending balance $1,685  $1,217  $5  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
                                             
Loans:                                            
Individually evaluated $3  $1,800  $-  $-  $688  $-  $-  $1,099  $-  $137  $3,727 
PCI Loans  1   1,746   22   611   4,858   790   -   2,295   257   -   10,580 
Collectively evaluated  245,852   177,555   13,092   38,372   111,718   36,964   10,288   137,861   48,672   5,865   826,239 
Total loans $245,856  $181,101  $13,114  $38,983  $117,264  $37,754  $10,288  $141,255  $48,929  $6,002  $840,546 
                                             
Less ALLL $1,685  $1,217  $5  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
Net loans $244,171  $179,884  $13,109  $38,971  $117,081  $34,408  $10,115  $140,522  $48,642  $5,985  $832,888 

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
 
The following table presents the balance and activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment and the recorded investment innonaccrual loans by portfolio segment based on the impairment method for the periods indicated:in total and then as a further breakdown by originated or acquired as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

  Six Months ended June 30, 2013 
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 Commercial
& industrial
  Agricultural production  
Owner- occupied
CRE
  
 
Agricultural real estate
  CRE investment  Construction & land development  Residential construction  Residential first mortgage  Residential junior mortgage  Retail &
other
  
 
Total
 
Beginning balance $1,969  $-  $1,069  $-  $337  $2,580  $137  $685  $312  $31  $7,120 
Provision  170   5   259   12   485   802   36   128   57   (4)  1,950 
Charge-offs  (475)  -   (113)  -   (639)  (36)  -   (86)  (83)  (11)  (1,443)
Recoveries  21   -   2   -   -   -   -   6   1   1   31 
Ending balance $1,685  $5  $1,217  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
As percent of ALLL  22.0%  0.1%  15.9%  0.2%  2.4%  43.7%  2.3%  9.5%  3.7%  0.2%  100.0%
                                             
ALLL: Individually evaluated
 $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
ALLL: PCI loans  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Collectively evaluated      1,685   5   1,217   12   183   3,346   173   733   287   17   7,658 
Ending balance $1,685  $5  $1,217  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
                                             
Loans:                                            
Individually evaluated $3  $-  $1,800  $-  $688  $-  $-  $1,099  $-  $137  $3,727 
PCI loans  1   22   1,746   611   4,858   790   -   2,295   257   -   10,580 
Collectively evaluated  245,852   13,092   177,555   38,372   111,718   36,964   10,288   137,861   48,672   5,865   826,239 
Total loans $245,856  $13,114  $181,101  $38,983  $117,264  $37,754  $10,288  $141,255  $48,929  $6,002  $840,546 
                                             
Less ALLL $1,685  $5  $1,217  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
Net loans $244,171  $13,109  $179,884  $38,971  $117,081  $34,408  $10,115  $140,522  $48,642  $5,985  $832,888 
(in thousands) June 30, 2014  % to Total  December 31, 2013  % to Total 
Commercial & industrial $517   7.2% $68   0.7%
Owner-occupied CRE  1,975   27.4   1,087   10.6 
AG production  27   0.4   11   0.1 
AG real estate  461   6.4   448   4.3 
CRE investment  1,607   22.3   4,631   45.1 
Construction & land development  479   6.7   1,265   12.3 
Residential construction  -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,671   23.2   2,365   23.0 
Residential junior mortgage  461   6.4   262   2.6 
Retail & other  -   -   129   1.3 
Nonaccrual loans - Total $7,198   100.0% $10,266   100.0%
                 
      Originated         
(in thousands) June 30, 2014  % to Total  December 31, 2013  % to Total 
Commercial & industrial $486   26.0% $67   8.9%
Owner-occupied CRE  1,042   56.0   -   - 
AG production  -   -   -   - 
AG real estate  -   -   -   - 
CRE investment  -   -   40   5.3 
Construction & land development  -   -   -   - 
Residential construction  -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  299   16.1   442   58.9 
Residential junior mortgage  35   1.9   73   9.7 
Retail & other  -   -   129   17.2 
Nonaccrual loans - Originated $1,862   100.0% $751   100.0%
                
      Acquired         
(in thousands) June 30, 2014  % to Total  December 31, 2013  % to Total 
Commercial & industrial $31   0.6% $1   0.1%
Owner-occupied CRE  933   17.5   1,087   11.4 
AG production  27   0.5   11   0.1 
AG real estate  461   8.6   448   4.7 
CRE investment  1,607   30.1   4,591   48.2 
Construction & land development  479   9.0   1,265   13.3 
Residential construction  -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,372   25.7   1,923   20.2 
Residential junior mortgage  426   8.0   189   2.0 
Retail & other  -   -   -   - 
Nonaccrual loans - Acquired $5,336   100.0% $9,515   100.0%
  Six Months ended June 30, 2012 
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 Commercial
& industrial
  Agricultural production  
Owner- occupied
CRE
  Agricultural real estate  CRE investment  Construction & land development  Residential construction  Residential first mortgage  Residential junior mortgage  Retail &
other
  Total 
Beginning balance $1,965  $-  $347  $-  $393  $2,035  $311  $405  $419  $24  $5,899 
Provision  729   -   1,096   127   24   (67)  163   171   96   36   2,375 
Charge-offs  (77)  -   (899)  (127)  (155)  (307)  (395)  (168)  (118)  (38)  (2,284)
Recoveries  30   -   8   -   -   5   -   7   4   1   55 
Ending balance $2,647  $-  $552  $-  $262  $1,666  $79  $415  $401  $23  $6,045 
As percent of ALLL  43.8%  0.0%  9.1%  0.0%  4.3%  27.6%  1.3%  6.9%  6.6%  0.4%  100.0%
                                             
ALLL: Individually evaluated $-  $-  $165  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $165 
Collectively evaluated  2,647   -   387   -   262   1,666   79   415   401   23   5,880 
Ending balance $2,647  $-  $552  $-  $262  $1,666  $79  $415  $401  $23  $6,045 
                                             
Loans:                                            
Individually evaluated $4,383  $-  $60  $34  $544  $8,527  $799  $797  $36  $151  $15,331 
Collectively evaluated  194,645   183   115,110   1,247   62,313   16,085   5,162   62,359   38,046   6,511   501,661 
Total loans $199,028  $183  $115,170  $1,281  $62,857  $24,612  $5,961  $63,156  $38,082  $6,662  $516,992 
                                             
Less ALLL $2,647  $0  $552  $0  $262  $1,666  $79  $415  $401  $23  $6,045 
Net loans $196,381  $183  $114,618  $1,281  $62,595  $2,946  $5,882  $62,741  $37,681  $6,639  $510,947 

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when management has determined collection of the interest on a loan is doubtful or when a loan is contractuallyThe following tables present total past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments.  When loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off, all current year unpaid accrued interest is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is subsequently accounted for on the cash basis until qualifying for return to accrual status.  If collectability of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.  Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.   Management considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by portfolio segment as of June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012.  The June 30, 2013 nonaccrual loans of $14.3 million include $10.6 million of loans acquired at fair value in the Mid-Wisconsin merger:2013:

(in thousands) 2013  % to Total  2012  % to Total 
Commercial & industrial $4   -% $784   11.2%
Agricultural production  22   0.2   -   - 
Owner-occupied CRE  3,546   24.8   1,960   27.9 
Agricultural real estate  611   4.3   -   - 
CRE investment  5,546   38.8   -   - 
Construction & land development  790   5.5   2,560   36.4 
Residential construction  -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  3,394   23.7   1,580   22.5 
Residential junior mortgage  257   1.8   -   - 
Retail & other  137   0.9   142   2.0 
    Nonaccrual loans $14,307   100.0% $7,026   100.0%

The following tables present past due loans by portfolio segment:
  June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) 30-89 Days
Past Due (accruing)
  90 Days &
Over or non-accrual
  Current  Total 
Commercial & industrial $377  $517  $268,483  $269,377 
Owner-occupied CRE  -   1,975   185,250   187,225 
AG production  20   27   13,935   13,982 
AG real estate  -   461   41,473   41,934 
CRE investment  767   1,607   77,265   79,639 
Construction & land development  165   479   44,860   45,504 
Residential construction  -   -   11,895   11,895 
Residential first mortgage  201   1,671   152,841   154,713 
Residential junior mortgage  -   461   49,783   50,244 
Retail & other  -   -   5,573   5,573 
Total loans $1,530  $7,198  $851,358  $860,086 
As a percent of total loans  0.2%  0.8%  99.0%  100.0%
 
  June 30, 2013 
(in thousands) 30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)  90 Days & Over or non-accrual  Current  Total 
Commercial & industrial $23  $4  $245,829  $245,856 
Agricultural production  7   22   13,085   13,114 
Owner-occupied CRE  89   3,546   177,466   181,101 
Agricultural real estate  87   611   38,285   38,983 
CRE investment  634   5,546   111,084   117,264 
Construction & land development  387   790   36,577   37,754 
Residential construction  -   -   10,288   10,288 
Residential first mortgage  661   3,394   137,200   141,255 
Residential junior mortgage  69   257   48,603   48,929 
Retail & other  8   137   5,857   6,002 
Total loans $1,965  $14,307  $824,274  $840,546 
As a percent of total loans  0.2%  1.7%  98.1%  100.0%
  December 31, 2012 
(in thousands) 30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)  90 Days &
Over or
nonaccrual
  Current  Total 
Commercial & industrial $-  $784  $196,517  $197,301 
Agricultural production  -   -   215   215 
Owner-occupied CRE  -   1,960   104,928   106,888 
Agricultural real estate  -   -   11,354   11,354 
CRE investment  -   -   76,618   76,618 
Construction & land development  -   2,560   19,231   21,791 
Residential construction  -   -   7,957   7,957 
Residential first mortgage  -   1,580   84,008   85,588 
Residential junior mortgage  -   -   39,352   39,352 
Retail & other  6   142   5,389   5,537 
Total loans $6  $7,026  $545,569  $552,601 
As a percent of total loans  0.0%  1.3%  98.7%  100.0%

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
  December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) 30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)  90 Days &
Over or nonaccrual
  Current  Total 
Commercial & industrial $-  $68  $253,606  $253,674 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,247   1,087   185,142   187,476 
AG production  -   11   14,245   14,256 
AG real estate  -   448   36,609   37,057 
CRE investment  491   4,631   85,173   90,295 
Construction & land development  -   1,265   41,616   42,881 
Residential construction  -   -   12,535   12,535 
Residential first mortgage  387   2,365   151,651   154,403 
Residential junior mortgage  12   262   49,089   49,363 
Retail & other  12   129   5,277   5,418 
Total loans $2,149  $10,266  $834,943  $847,358 
As a percent of total loans  0.3%  1.2%  98.5%  100.0%

A description of the loan risk categories used by the Company follows:

1-4 Pass: Credits exhibit adequate cash flows, appropriate management and financial ratios within industry norms and/or are supported by sufficient collateral. Some credits in these rating categories may require a need for monitoring but elements of concern are not severe enough to warrant an elevated rating.

5 Watch: Credits with this rating are adequately secured and performing but are being monitored due to the presence of various short termshort-term weaknesses which may include unexpected, short termshort-term adverse financial performance, managerial problems, potential impact of a decline in the entire industry or local economy and delinquency issues. Loans to individuals or loans supported by guarantors with marginal net worth or collateral may be included in this rating category.

6 Special Mention: Credits with this rating have potential weaknesses that, without the Company’s attention and correction may result in deterioration of repayment prospects. These assets are considered Criticized Assets. Potential weaknesses may include adverse financial trends for the borrower or industry, repeated lack of compliance with Company requests, increasing debt to net worth, serious management conditions and decreasing cash flow.

7 Substandard: Assets with this rating are characterized by the distinct possibility the Company will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected. All foreclosures, liquidations, and non-accrual loans are considered to be categorized in this rating, regardless of collateral sufficiency.

8 Doubtful: Assets with this rating exhibit all the weaknesses as one rated Substandard with the added characteristic that such weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable.
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

9 Loss: Assets in this category are considered uncollectible. Pursuing any recovery or salvage value is impractical but does not preclude partial recovery in the future.
 
The following tables present total loans by loan grade:grade as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

 June 30, 2013  June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) Grades 1- 4  Grade 5  Grade 6  Grade 7  Grade 8  Grade 9  Total  Grades 1- 4  Grade 5  Grade 6  Grade 7  Grade 8  Grade 9  Total 
Commercial & industrial $231,391  $12,319  $700  $1,446  $-  $-  $245,856  $253,077  $10,232  $802  $5,266  $-  $-  $269,377 
Agricultural production  12,436   291   279   108   -   -   13,114 
Owner-occupied CRE  163,633   6,545   4,607   6,316   -   -   181,101   177,898   3,891   1,758   3,678   -   -   187,225 
Agricultural real estate  25,514   10,289   1,827   1,353   -   -   38,983 
AG production  13,569   42   -   371   -   -   13,982 
AG real estate  31,408   9,679   61   786   -   -   41,934 
CRE investment  97,074   11,283   317   8,590   -   -   117,264   75,434   2,141   -   2,064   -   -   79,639 
Construction & land development  28,061   2,416   859   6,418   -   -   37,754   34,717   2,463   -   8,324   -   -   45,504 
Residential construction  8,906   -   -   1,382   -   -   10,288   11,378   -   -   517   -   -   11,895 
Residential first mortgage  134,511   2,299   -   4,445   -   -   141,255   151,525   1,203   -   1,985   -   -   154,713 
Residential junior mortgage  48,366   287   -   276   -   -   48,929   49,241   42   -   961   -   -   50,244 
Retail & other  5,854   -   -   148   -   -   6,002   5,562   11   -   -   -   -   5,573 
Total loans $755,746  $45,729  $8,589  $30,482  $-  $-  $840,546  $803,809  $29,704  $2,621  $23,952  $-  $-  $860,086 
Percent of total  89.9%  5.5%  1.0%  3.6%  -   -   100%  93.5%  3.4%  0.3%  2.8%  -   -   100%

 December 31, 2012  December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) Grades 1- 4  Grade 5  Grade 6  Grade 7  Grade 8  Grade 9  Total  Grades 1- 4  Grade 5  Grade 6  Grade 7  Grade 8  Grade 9  Total 
Commercial & industrial $192,426  $1,969  $604  $2,517  $-  $-  $197,516  $240,626  $7,134  $722  $5,192  $-  $-  $253,674 
Owner-occupied CRE  96,313   16,502   1,832   3,595   -   -   118,242   174,070   6,605   2,644   4,157   -   -   187,476 
AG production  13,631   267   -   358   -   -   14,256 
AG real estate  26,058   10,159   62   778   -   -   37,057 
CRE investment  66,358   8,545   -   1,715   -   -   76,618   83,475   1,202   15   5,603   -   -   90,295 
Construction & land development  12,351   855   877   7,708   -   -   21,791   31,051   2,229   119   9,482   -   -   42,881 
Residential construction  6,775   -   -   1,182   -   -   7,957   12,187   -   -   348   -   -   12,535 
Residential first mortgage  82,914   1,094   -   1,580   -   -   85,588   150,343   1,365   -   2,695   -   -   154,403 
Residential junior mortgage  38,582   199   249   322   -   -   39,352   48,886   215   -   262   -   -   49,363 
Retail & other  5,537   -   -   -   -   -   5,537   5,274   15   -   129   -   -   5,418 
Total loans $501,256  $29,164  $3,562  $18,619  $-  $-  $552,601  $785,601  $29,191  $3,562  $29,004  $-  $-  $847,358 
Percent of total  90.7%  5.3%  0.6%  3.4%  -   -   100%  92.8%  3.4%  0.4%  3.4%  -   -   100%

Note 6 – Loans, AllowanceManagement considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. For determining the adequacy of the ALLL, management defines impaired loans as nonaccrual credit relationships over $250,000, plus additional loans with impairment risk characteristics. Management instituted the nonaccrual scope criteria in the second quarter of 2013, particularly in response to the higher volume of smaller nonaccrual loans acquired in the 2013 acquisitions. At the time an individual loan goes into nonaccrual status, however, management evaluates the loan for Loan Losses,impairment and Credit Quality, continuedpossible charge-off regardless of loan size.

In determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses,ALLL, management includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans, with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and another component primarily based on other qualitative factors. Impaired loans are individually assessed and are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Loans that are determined not to be impaired are collectively evaluated for impairment, stratified by type and allocated loss ranges based on the Company’s actual historical loss ratios for each strata, and adjustments are also provided for certain current environmental and qualitative factors. An internal loan review function rates loans using a grading system based on nine different categories. Loans with grades of seven or higher (“classified loans”) represent loans with a greater risk of loss and may be assigned allocations for loss based on specific review of the weaknesses observed in the individual credits if classified as impaired. Classified loans are constantly monitored by the loan review function to ensure early identification of any deterioration.

Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The following tables present impaired loans as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. As a further breakdown, impaired loans are also summarized by originated and acquired for the periods presented. PCI loans acquired in the 2013 acquisitions were initially recorded at a fair value of $16.7 million on their respective acquisition dates, indicated:net of an initial $12.2 million nonaccretable mark and a zero accretable mark. At June 30, 2014, $5.6 million of the $16.7 million remain in impaired loans. Included in the June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 impaired loans is one troubled debt restructuring totaling $3.9 million described below under “Troubled Debt Restructurings.”
  Total Impaired Loans – June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
Commercial & industrial* $332  $341  $213  $167  $14 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,999   3,033   -   1,543   111 
AG production  27   95   -   18   5 
AG real estate  459   560   -   451   12 
CRE investment  1,913   5,351   -   3,210   131 
Construction & land development*  4,358   4,939   420   6,869   65 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,319   2,664   -   1,514   86 
Residential junior mortgage  438   847   -   305   11 
Retail & Other  -   -   -   -   - 
Total $10,845  $17,830  $633  $14,077  $435 
  Originated – June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
Commercial & industrial* $323  $323  $213  $162  $13 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,042   1,042   -   521   45 
AG production  -   -   -   -   - 
AG real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
CRE investment  -   -   -   -   - 
Construction & land development*  3,879   3,879   420   6,048   20 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential junior mortgage  -   -   -   -   - 
Retail & Other  -   -   -   -   - 
Total $5,244  $5,244  $633  $6,731  $78 

 Acquired – June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) 
Recorded Investment
  Unpaid Principal
Balance
  Related Allowance  Average
Recorded
Investment
  Interest Income
Recognized
  
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
June 30, 2013            
With no related allowance:               
Commercial & industrial $4  $5  $-  $9  $-  $9  $18  $-  $5  $1 
Agricultural production  22   62   -   36   4 
Owner-occupied CRE  3,546   4,993   -   3,673   72   957   1,991   -   1,022   66 
Agricultural real estate  611   619   -   524   15 
CRE investment  5,546   7,967   -   5,558   255 
Construction & land development  790   1,100   -   619   49 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  3,394   4,313   -   3,206   157 
Residential junior mortgage  257   275   -   263   15 
Retail & Other  137   147   -   149   4 
With a related allowance:          -         
Commercial & industrial $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Agricultural production  -   -   -   -   - 
Owner-occupied CRE  -   -   -   -   - 
Agricultural real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
CRE investment  -   -   -   -   - 
Construction & land
development
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential junior mortgage  -   -   -   -   - 
Retail & Other  -   -   -   -   - 
Total:                    
Commercial & industrial $4  $5  $-  $9  $- 
Agricultural production  22   62   -   36   4 
Owner-occupied CRE  3,546   4,993   -   3,673   72 
Agricultural real estate  611   619   -   524   15 
AG production  27   95   -   18   5 
AG real estate  459   560   -   451   12 
CRE investment  5,546   7,967   -   5,558   255   1,913   5,351   -   3,210   131 
Construction & land development  790   1,100   -   619   49   479   1,060   -   821   45 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  3,394   4,313   -   3,206   157   1,319   2,664   -   1,514   86 
Residential junior mortgage  257   275   -   263   15   438   847   -   305   11 
Retail & Other  137   147   -   149   4   -   -   -   -   - 
Total $14,307  $19,481  $-  $14,037  $571  $5,601  $12,586  $-  $7,346  $357 

*One commercial and industrial loan with a balance of $323,000 had a specific reserve of $213,000. One construction and land development loan with a balance of $3.9 million had a specific reserve of $420,000. No other loans had a related allowance at June 30, 2014 and, therefore, the above disclosure was not expanded to include loans with and without a related allowance.
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
                
  Total Impaired Loans – December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
Commercial & industrial $1  $140  $-  $1  $3 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,086   4,151   -   1,268   169 
AG production  9   76   -   11   5 
AG real estate  443   558   -   443   9 
CRE investment  4,507   9,056   -   4,592   451 
Construction & land development**  9,379   10,580   3,204   9,406   178 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,708   4,177   -   1,827   215 
Residential junior mortgage  172   703   -   198   26 
Retail & Other  -   36   -   -   3 
Total $17,305  $29,477  $3,204  $17,746  $1,059 
               
 Originated – December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) Recorded Investment  Unpaid Principal
Balance
  Related Allowance  Average
Recorded
Investment
  Interest Income Recognized  
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
December 31, 2012            
With no related allowance:               
Commercial & industrial $784  $1,287  $-  $3,015  $265  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,960   1,960   -   636   95   -   -   -   -   - 
AG production  -   -   -   -   - 
AG real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
CRE investment  -   -   -   439   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Construction & land development  2,560   2,560   -   6,333   - 
Construction & land development**  8,217   8,217   3,204   8,215   43 
Residential construction  -   -   -   620   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,580   1,696   -   1,298   88   -   -   -   -   - 
Residential junior mortgage  -   -   -   58   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Retail & Other  142   150   -   120   7   -   -   -   -   - 
With a related allowance:          -         
Commercial & industrial $-  $-  $-  $177  $- 
Owner-occupied CRE  -   -   -   162   - 
CRE investment  -   -   -   -   - 
Construction & land development.  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential junior mortgage  -   -   -   -   - 
Retail & other  -   -   -   -   - 
Total:                    
Commercial & industrial $784  $1,287  $-  $3,192  $265 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,960   1,960   -   798   95 
CRE investment  -   -   -   439   - 
Construction & land development  2,560   2,560   -   6,333   - 
Residential construction  -   -   -   620   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,580   1,696   -   1,298   88 
Residential junior mortgage  -   -   -   58   - 
Retail & other  142   150   -   120   7 
Total $7,026  $7,653  $-  $12,858  $455  $8,217  $8,217  $3,204  $8,215  $43 

  Acquired – December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
Commercial & industrial $1  $140  $-  $1  $3 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,086   4,151   -   1,268   169 
AG production  9   76   -   11   5 
AG real estate  443   558   -   443   9 
CRE investment  4,507   9,056   -   4,592   451 
Construction & land development  1,162   2,363   -   1,191   135 
Residential construction  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  1,708   4,177   -   1,827   215 
Residential junior mortgage  172   703   -   198   26 
Retail & other  -   36   -   -   3 
Total $9,088  $21,260  $-  $9,531  $1,016 
 
**One loan with a balance of $3.9 million and a reserve of $3.2 million is included within the construction and land development category. No other loans had a related allowance at December 31, 2013 and, therefore, the above disclosure was not expanded to include loans with and without a related allowance.
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

Troubled Debt Restructurings
 
At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012,2014, there were nofive loans classified or reported as troubled debt restructurings.restructurings totaling $4.3 million. One loan had a premodification balance of $3.9 million and at June 30, 2014, had a balance of $3.9 million, was in compliance with its modified terms, was not past due, and was included in impaired loans with a specific reserve allocation of approximately $420,000. This loan is performing but is disclosed as impaired as a result of its classification as a troubled debt restructuring. The remaining four loans had a combined premodification balance of $438,000 and a combined outstanding balance of $407,000 at June 30, 2014. There were no other loans which were modified and classified as troubletroubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2013.2014. There were no loans which were classified as troubled debt restructurings during the previous twelve months that subsequently defaulted during the six months endedas of June 30, 2013.2014. Loans which were considered troubled debt restructurings by Mid-Wisconsin prior to the acquisition arewere not required to be classified as troubled debt restructurings in the Company’s financial statements unless or until such loans would subsequently meet criteria to be classified as such, since acquired loans were recorded at their estimated fair values at the time of the acquisition.

Note 7- Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)Notes Payable

A summary of OREO, net of valuation allowances, for the periods indicated is as follows:
                 
   Three Months ended  Six Months ended 
(in thousands)  June 30, 2013  June 30, 2012  June  30, 2013  June 30, 2012 
Balance at beginning of period $2,038  $260  $193  $641 
Transfer of loans at net realizable value to OREO  166   744   2,116   1,123 
Sale proceeds  (884)  (120)  (993)  (820)
Net gain (loss) from sale of OREO  284   6   288   (54)
Acquired balance, net  1,756   -   1,756   - 
Balance at end of period $3,360  $890  $3,360  $890 
Note 8- Borrowings
At June 30, 2013 the Company had short-term borrowings maturing within twelve months consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances of $20.0 million and short term repurchase agreements of approximately $13.2 million.
The Company had the following long term notes payable:
 
(in thousands) June 30, 2013  December 31, 2012 
Joint Venture note $10,040  $10,155 
FHLB advances  15,000   25,000 
Notes Payable $25,040  $35,155 

(in thousands) June 30, 2014  December 31, 2013 
Joint venture note $9,799  $9,922 
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances  17,500   22,500 
Notes payable $27,299  $32,422 

At the completion of the construction of the Company’s headquarters building in 2005 and as part of a joint venture investment related to the building, the Company and the other joint venture partners guaranteed a joint venture note to finance certain costs of the building. This note is secured by the building, bears a fixed rate of 5.81% and requires monthly principal and interest payments until its maturity on June 1, 2016.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, theThe Company’s fixed-rate FHLB advances totaled $15 million and $25 million, respectively,are all fixed rate, require interest-only monthly payments, and have maturities through August 2016.February 2018. The weighted average rate of FHLB advances was 2.45% and 2.87%1.36% at June 30, 20132014 and 1.85% at December 31, 2012, respectively.2013. The FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on qualifying first mortgages, home equity loans, multi-family loans and certain farmland loans which totaled approximately $80.3$91.5 million and $54.2$85.9 million at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, respectively.

The following table shows the maturity schedule of the notes payable as of June 30, 2013:2014:

Maturing in (in thousands) 
2014 $6,125 
2015  5,762 
2016  14,412 
2017  - 
2018  1,000 
  $27,299 
 
Years Ending December 31, (in thousands) 
2013 $118 
2014  10,248 
2015  262 
2016  14,412 
  $25,040 
Note 98 - Junior Subordinated Debentures

At June 30, 2013 theThe Company’s carrying value of junior subordinated debentures was $12.0 million.$12.2 million at June 30, 2014 and $12.1 million at December 31, 2013. In July 2004 Nicolet Bankshares Statutory Trust I (the “Statutory Trust”), issued $6.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests (“trust preferred securities”) that qualify as Tier I capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. All of the common securities of the Statutory Trust are owned by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust preferred securities were used by the Statutory Trust to purchase $6.2 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay an 8% fixed rate. Interest on these debentures is current. The debentures may be redeemed in part or in full, on or after July 15, 2009 at par plus any accrued but unpaid interest. The maturity date of the debenture, if not redeemed, is July 15, 2034.

As part of the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition, the Company assumed $10.3 million of junior subordinated debentures related to $10.0 million of issued trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities and the debentures mature on December 15, 2035 and have a floating rate of the three-month LIBOR plus 1.43% adjusted quarterly. Interest on these debentures is current. The debentures may be called at par in part or in full, on or after December 15, 2010 or within 120 days of certain events. At acquisition in April 2013 the debentures were recorded at a fair value of $5.8 million, with the discount being accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the debentures. TheAt June 30, 2014, the carrying value of these junior debentures was $6.0 million and the $5.7 million carrying value of related trust preferred securities qualifies as Tier 1 capital.  Interest on these debentures is current.

Note 109 - Fair Value Measurements

The relevantAs provided for by accounting standard (codified in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”) definesstandards, the Company records and/or discloses financial instruments on a fair value establishes a framework for measuringbasis. These financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements; accordingly, the standard amends numerous accounting pronouncements but does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances. The standard emphasizes that fair value (i.e. the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date), among other things, isthree levels, based on exit price versus entry price, should includethe markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the observability of the assumptions about risk such as nonperformance risk in liability fair values, and is a market-based measurement versus an entity-specific measurement.
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs used to measuredetermine fair value into three broad levels.value. These levels are: Level 1 inputs are- quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the measurement date.date; Level 2 inputs are- inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.indirectly; Level 3 inputs are– significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels, the level within which the entire fair value measurement will be categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety; this assessment of the significance of an input requires management judgment.

The following table presents items measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis         
  June 30, 2013 
     Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $1,001  $-  $1,001  $- 
State, county and municipals  52,340       51,965   375 
Mortgage-backed securities  73,263   -   73,263   - 
Corporate debt securities  220   -   -   220 
Equity securities  3,164   3,164   -   - 
Securities available for sale, June 30, 2013 $129,988  $3,164  $126,229  $595 
  December 31, 2012 
     Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
State, county and municipals $32,687  $-  $32,312  $375 
Mortgage-backed securities  20,668   -   20,668   - 
Equity securities  2,546   2,546   -   - 
Securities available for sale, December 31, 2012 $55,901  $2,546  $52,980  $375 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the items noted in the table above, including the general classification of such instruments in the fair value hierarchy. Where quoted market prices on securities exchanges are available, the investment is classified in Level 1Disclosure of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investments primarily include exchange-traded equity securities availableof financial instruments, whether recognized or not recognized in the balance sheet, is required for sale. If quoted market prices are not available,those instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, with the exception of certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments as provided for by the accounting standards. For financial instruments recognized at fair value is generally determined using pricing models (such as matrix pricing which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities), quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristic (adjusted for differences between the quoted instruments and the instrument being valued), or discounted cash flows, and are classified in Level 2 ofconsolidated balance sheets, the fair value hierarchy. Finally,disclosure requirements also apply.

Fair value (i.e. the price that would be received in certain cases where therean orderly transaction that is limited activitynot a forced liquidation or less transparency around inputs todistressed sale at the estimatedmeasurement date), among other things, is based on exit price versus entry price, should include assumptions about risk such as nonperformance risk in liability fair value, investments are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Examples of these include auction rate securities available for sale (for which there has been no liquid market since 2008)values, and corporate debt securities.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, it was determined that carrying value was the best approximation of fair value for these Level 3 securities, based primarily on receipt of par from refinances for the auction rate securities.is a market-based measurement versus an entity-specific measurement.
 
Note 109 - Fair Value Measurements, continued

The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods presented. There were no changes in Level 3 values to report during the first six months of 2014.
     Fair Value Measurements Using 
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis: Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
 (in thousands)            
 U.S. government sponsored enterprises $1,537  $-  $1,537  $- 
 State, county and municipals  77,067   -   76,190   877 
 Mortgage-backed securities  62,928   -   62,928   - 
 Corporate debt securities  220   -   -   220 
 Equity securities  1,903   1,903   -   - 
 Securities AFS, June 30, 2014 $143,655  $1,903  $140,655  $1,097 
                 
 (in thousands)                
 U.S. government sponsored enterprises $2,057  $-  $2,057  $- 
 State, county and municipals  55,039   -   54,162   877 
 Mortgage-backed securities  67,879   -   67,879   - 
 Corporate debt securities  220   -   -   220 
 Equity securities  2,320   2,320   -   - 
 Securities AFS, December 31, 2013 $127,515  $2,320  $124,098  $1,097 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the items noted in the tables above. Where quoted market prices on securities exchanges are available, the investment is classified as Level 1. Level 1 investments primarily include exchange-traded equity securities available for sale. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is generally determined using prices obtained from independent pricing vendors who use pricing models (with typical inputs including benchmark yields, reported trades for similar securities, issuer spreads or relationship to other benchmark quoted securities), or discounted cash flows, and are classified as Level 2. Examples of these investments include mortgage-related securities and obligations of state, county and municipals. Finally, in certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the estimated fair value, investments are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Examples of these include auction rate securities available for sale (for which there has been no liquid market since 2008) and corporate debt securities. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, it was determined that carrying value was the best approximation of fair value for these Level 3 securities, based primarily on receipt of par from refinances for the auction rate securities and the internal analysis on the corporate debt securities.

The following table presents the Company’s collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”) measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregated byfor the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.periods presented.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis 
  June 30, 2013 
     Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Collateral-dependent impaired loans $14,307  $-  $-  $14,307 
Other real estate owned  3,360   -   -   3,360 
Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis 
     Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
June 30, 2014:            
Impaired loans
 $10,212  $-  $-  $10,212 
OREO  1,502   -   -   1,502 
December 31, 2013:                
Impaired loans $14,101  $-  $-  $14,101 
OREO  1,987   -   -   1,987 
  December 31, 2012 
     Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Collateral-dependent impaired loans $7,026  $-  $-  $7,026 
Other real estate owned  193   -   -   193 

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the items noted in the table above, including the general classification of such instruments in the fair value hierarchy. For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, or the estimated liquidity of the note. For other real estate owned,OREO, the fair value is based upon the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral adjusted for the expected costs to sell.
 
Summarized below areNote 9 - Fair Value Measurements, continued

The Company is required under accounting guidance to report the fair value of all financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets, including those financial instruments carried at cost. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012, along with the methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating the fair value disclosures.2013 are shown below.
  June 30, 2014 
(in thousands) 
Carrying
Amount
  
Estimated
Fair Value
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $85,588  $85,588  $85,588  $-  $- 
Certificates of deposit in other banks  7,144   7,172   -   7,172   - 
Securities AFS  143,655   143,655   1,903   140,655   1,097 
Other investments  8,056   8,056   -   5,915   2,141 
Loans held for sale  3,589   3,589   3,589   -   - 
Loans, net  850,444   854,732   -   -   854,732 
Bank owned life insurance  26,980   26,980   26,980   -   - 
                     
Financial liabilities:                    
Deposits $1,011,121  $1,013,407  $-  $-  $1,013,407 
Short-term borrowings  3,399   3,399   3,399   -   - 
Notes payable  27,299   30,316   -   30,316   - 
Junior subordinated debentures  12,228   12,215   -   -   12,215 

  December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) 
Carrying
Amount
  
Estimated
Fair Value
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $146,978  $146,978  $146,978  $-  $- 
Certificates of deposit in other banks  1,960   1,983   -   1,983   - 
Securities AFS  127,515   127,515   2,320   124,098   1,097 
Other investments  7,982   7,982   -   5,841   2,141 
Loans held for sale  1,486   1,486   1,486   -   - 
Loans, net  838,126   842,758   -   -   842,758 
Bank owned life insurance  23,796   23,796   23,796   -   - 
                     
Financial liabilities:                    
Deposits $1,034,834  $1,036,564  $-  $-  $1,036,564 
Short-term borrowings  7,116   7,116   7,116   -   - 
Notes payable  32,422   32,548   -   32,548   - 
Junior subordinated debentures  12,128   12,704   -   -   12,704 
 
  June 30, 2013 
  Carrying  Estimated  Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Amount  Fair Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
                
Financial assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $36,146  $36,146  $36,146  $-  $- 
Certificates of deposit in other banks  1,960   2,005   -   -   2,005 
Securities available for sale  129,988   129,988   3,164   126,229   595 
Other investments  7,531   7,531   -   4,864   2,667 
Loans held for sale  3,142   3,142   3,142   -   - 
Loans, net  832,888   819,981   -   -   819,981 
Bank owned life insurance  23,352   23,352   23,352   -   - 
                     
Financial liabilities:                    
Deposits $908,083  $910,248  $-  $-  $910,248 
Short-term borrowings  33,231   33,231   33,231   -   - 
Notes payable  25,040   25,268   -   25,268   - 
Junior subordinated debentures  12,029   11,617   -   -   11,617 
Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements, continued
  December 31, 2012 
  Carrying  Estimated  Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands) Amount  Fair Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $82,003  $82,003  $82,003  $-  $- 
Securities available for sale  55,901   55,901   2,546   52,980   375 
Other investments  5,221   5,221   -   3,243   1,978 
Loans held for sale  7,323   7,323   7,323   -   - 
Loans, net  545,481   540,887   -   -   540,887 
Bank owned life insurance  18,697   18,697   18,697   -   - 
Financial liabilities:                    
Deposits $616,093  $617,677  $-  $-  $617,677 
Short-term borrowings  4,035   4,035   4,035   -   - 
Notes payable  35,155   36,017   -   36,017   - 
Junior subordinated debentures  6,186   6,186   -   -   6,186 
TheNot all the financial instruments listed in the table above are subject to the disclosure provisions of ASC 820, as certain assets and liabilities result in their carrying value approximating fair value. These include cash and cash equivalents, other investments, loans held for sale, BOLI, nonmaturing deposits, and short-term borrowings. For those financial instruments not previously disclosed the following is a description of the valuationevaluation methodologies used for assets and liabilities which are either recorded or disclosed at fair value.used.
 
Cash and cash equivalents and certificatesCertificates of depositdeposits in other banksbanks::  For these short-term Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current interest rates being offered by instruments the carrying amount iswith similar terms and represents a reasonable estimate of fair value.Level 2 measurement.
 
Securities available for sale and other investmentsAFS: Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices on securities exchanges, when available, which is considered a Level 1 measurement. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is generally determined using pricing models widely used in the industry, quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows, which is considered a Level 2 measurement, and Level 3 was deemed appropriate for auction rate securities (for which there has been no liquid market since 2008) and corporate debt securities which include trust preferred security investments.instruments. The corporate debt securities were acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition and valued based on a discounted cash flowsflow analysis and the underlying credit quality of the underlying issuer. The fair value approximates the acquired cost at June 30, 2013.acquisition. For other investments, the carrying amount of Federal Reserve Bank, Bankers Bank, Farmer Mac, and FHLB stock is a reasonably accepted fair value estimate given their restricted nature. Fair value is the redeemable (carrying) value based on the redemption provisions of the instruments which is considered a Level 2 measurement. The carrying amount of the remaining other investments (particularly common stocks of companies or other banks that are not publicly traded) approximates their fair value, determined primarily by analysis of company financial statements and recent capital issuances of the respective companies or banks, if any, and represents a Level 3 measurement.
 
Loans held for sale:  The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates the fair value, given the short-term nature of the loans between origination and sale, which is considered a Level 1 measurement.Note 9 - Fair Value Measurements, continued
 
Loans, net: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk or other optionality, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for all other loans are estimated by discounting contractual cash flows using estimated market discount rates, which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. Collateral-dependent impaired loans are included in loans, net. The fair value of loans is considered to be a Level 3 measurement due to internally developed discounted cash flow measurements.
 
Bank owned life insurance:  The carrying value of these assets approximates fair value, which is considered a Level 1 measurement.
Deposits: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity (such as demand deposits, savings, interest and non-interest checking, and money market accounts) is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market place on certificates within the market place.of similar remaining maturities. Use of internal discounted cash flows provides a Level 3 fair value measurement.
 
Short-term borrowings:  Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements, continued
Notes payable: The fair value of the Federal Home Loan Bank advances is obtained from the Federal Home Loan Bank which uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market rates of similar maturity debt securities and represents a Level 2 measurement. The fair values of remaining notes payable are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and credit quality which represents a Level 2 measurement.
 
Junior subordinated debentures: The fair values of junior subordinated debentures are estimated based on an evaluation of current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and credit quality. Since the market for these instruments is limited, the internal evaluation represents a Level 3 measurement.
 
Off-balance-sheet instruments: The estimated fair value of letters of credit at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 was insignificant. Loan commitments on which the committed interest rate is less than the current market rate are also insignificant at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012.2013.

Limitations: Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Fair value estimates may not be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instrument. In some instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments, in which case fair values may be based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques, or based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of the financial instruments, or other factors. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. Subsequent changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
 
Note 11 - Subsequent Event
On August 9, 2013, Nicolet National Bank (the “Bank”) announced that it entered into an agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of a one-branch bank in Wausau, Wisconsin, effective immediately. Subject to final settlements, the Bank acquired approximately $29.9 million of the failed bank assets.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, providing a diversified range of traditional banking and wealth management services to individuals and businesses in its market area through the 2223 branch offices of its banking subsidiary, Nicolet National Bank, in northeastern and central Wisconsin and Menominee, Michigan.

The primary revenue sources of Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Nicolet” or the “Company”) are net interest income, representing interest income from loans and other interest earning assets such as investments, less interest expense on deposits and other borrowings, and noninterest income, including, among others, trust fees, secondary mortgage income and other fees or revenue from financial services provided to customers or ancillary to loans and deposits. Business volumes and pricing drive revenue potential and tend to be influenced by overall economic factors, including market interest rates, business spending, consumer confidence, economic growth and competitive conditions within the marketplace.

At June 30, 2013,2014, total assets were $1.1$1.2 billion and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $4.8 million. When comparing 2014 results to prior year periods, the timing of Nicolet’s 2013 was $12.2 million.  Financialacquisitions impacts the 2013 financial results and comparisons to 2014. These acquisitions (collectively referred to as the “2013 acquisitions”) consisted of June 30, 2013 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, are largely impacted by the Company’spredominantly stock-for-stock acquisition of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”), which was consummated on April 26, 2013, and the FDIC-assisted transaction to acquire Bank of Wausau, which was effective August 9, 2013. The eleven banking branches of Mid-Wisconsin opened as Nicolet National Bank on April 29, 2013. The transaction wastransactions were accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and thus, the results of operations of Mid-Wisconsinthe acquired entities prior to thetheir respective consummation datedates were not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The eleven banking branches of Mid-Wisconsin and the one branch of Bank of Wausau opened as Nicolet National Bank branches on April 29 and August 10, 2013, respectively. At acquisition, the Mid-Wisconsin transaction increased total assets by $435 million, total liabilities by $415 million, common equity by approximately $9.3 million, and resulted in a bargain purchase gain of $10.4 million during the second quarter of 2013. In the third quarter of 2013, a $0.9 million negative adjustment was recorded to that bargain purchase gain relative to a change in estimate of a now settled legal action. The 2013 income statement also includesincluded approximately $1.7 million (approximately $0.1 million and $1.6 million in the first and second quarters, respectively, of 2013) of pre-tax, non-recurring merger related expenses tied to preparation for, consummation of and integration of Mid-Wisconsin into the Company. Additionally,On a smaller scale, the Bank of Wausau transaction increased total assets by $47 million at acquisition (of which $18 million of cash was used during the month of September 2013 to immediately redeem rate-sensitive certificates of deposit), and resulted in a pre-tax bargain purchase gain of $2.4 million and approximately $0.2 million of pre-tax, non-recurring merger related expenses recorded in the third quarter of 2013. Finally, acquisition accounting requires assets purchased and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition, which impacted various ratios, but most notably asset quality measures (as loans are recorded directly at their estimated fair value and no addition to the allowance for loan losses is recorded at consummation) and taxes. Therefore, the 2014 results include both acquisitions fully, while the six months ended June 30, 2013, includes approximately two months of Mid-Wisconsin and no results of Bank of Wausau. For additional details, see “Note 2 – Acquisition”, NoteAcquisitions” and “Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, and Income Taxes“--Income Taxes” within this document.

On November 28, 2012, Nicolet entered into a merger agreement with Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”), and initially filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Regis. No. 333-186401) (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Act. On March 26, 2013, the Registration Statement became effective and Nicolet became a public reporting company under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements made in this document and in documents that are incorporated by reference which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including any statements regarding descriptions of management’s plans, objectives, or goals for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of its revenues, earnings, or other measures of performance. Forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations and, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements generally may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “should,” “will,” “intend,” or similar expressions. Stockholders should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document, could affect the future financial results of Nicolet and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements contained in this document. These factors, many of which are beyond Nicolet’s control, include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:

operating, legal and regulatory risks, including the effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and regulations promulgated thereunder, as well as the rules by the Federal bank regulatory agencies to implement the Basel III capital accord;
economic, political and competitive forces affecting Nicolet’s banking and wealth management businesses;
changes in interest rates, monetary policy and general economic conditions, which may impact Nicolet’s net interest income;
potential difficulties in integrating the operations of Nicolet and Mid-Wisconsin;
with those of acquired entities, if any;
compliance or operational risks related to new products, services, ventures, or lines of business, if any, that Nicolet may pursue or implement; and
the risk that Nicolet’s analyses of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful; andunsuccessful.

other factors discussed under “Risk Factors” included in the Joint Proxy Statement-Prospectus contained in the  Registration Statement.
These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. Nicolet specifically disclaims any obligation to update factors or to publicly announce the results of revisions to any of the forward-looking statements or comments included herein to reflect future events or developments.

 
Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements of Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions and judgments reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the valuation of loans acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction,2013 acquisitions, as well as the determination of the allowance for loan losses and income taxes and, therefore, are critical accounting policies.

Business Combinations and Valuation of Loans Acquired in Business CombinationCombinations

We account for acquisitions under FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date. As provided for under GAAP, management has up to 12 months following the date of the acquisition to finalize the fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, where it was not possible to estimate the acquisition date fair value upon consummation. Once management has finalized the fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities within this 12-month period, management considers such values to be the Day 1 Fair Values. This was completed for the Mid-Wisconsin transaction during the second quarter of 2014 and will be completed for the Bank of Wausau transaction in the third quarter of 2014.

In particular, the valuation of acquired loans involves significant estimates, assumptions and judgment based on information available as of the acquisition date. Substantially all loans acquired in the transaction are evaluated either individually or in pools of loans with similar characteristics; and since the estimated fair value of acquired loans includes a credit consideration, no carryover of any previously recorded allowance for loan losses is recorded at acquisition. A number of factors are considered in determining the estimated fair value of purchased loans including, among other things, the remaining life of the acquired loans, estimated prepayments, estimated loss ratios, estimated value of the underlying collateral, estimated holding periods, contractual interest rates compared to market interest rates, and net present value of cash flows expected to be received.

In determining the Day 1 Fair Values of acquired loans, management calculates a non-accretable difference (the credit mark component of the acquired loans) and an accretable difference (the market rate or yield component of the acquired loans). The non-accretable difference is the difference between the undiscounted contractually required payments and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected in accordance with management’s determination of the Day 1 Fair Values. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows will result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to the accretable, yield, and nonaccretable differencedifferences which would have a positive impact on interest income.

The accretable yield on acquired loans is the difference between the expected cash flows and the initial investment in the acquired loans. The accretable yield is recognized into earnings using the effective yield method over the term of the loans. Management separately monitors the acquired loan portfolio and periodically reviews loans contained within this portfolio against the factors and assumptions used in determining the Day 1 Fair Values.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses (the “ALLL”)ALLL is a reserve for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Actual credit losses, net of recoveries, are deducted from the ALLL. Loans are charged off when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL. A provision for loan losses, which is a charge against earnings, is recorded to bring the ALLL to a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation process used to determine the appropriateness of the ALLL is subject to the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgment. The evaluation process involves gathering and interpreting many qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect probable credit losses. Because interpretation and analysis involves judgment, current economic or business conditions can change, and future events are inherently difficult to predict, the anticipated amount of estimated loan losses and therefore the appropriateness of the ALLL could change significantly.

The allocation methodology applied by Nicolet is designed to assess the appropriateness of the ALLL and includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans, with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and a component primarily based on other qualitative factors. The methodology includes evaluation and consideration of several factors, such as, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans, facts and issues related to specific loans, historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and nonaccrual loans, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions or circumstances underlying the collectability of loans. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the ALLL is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular loan category. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio. Management believes the ALLL is appropriate.appropriate at June 30, 2014. The allowance analysis is reviewed by the board of directors on a quarterly basis in compliance with regulatory requirements. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the ALLL. These agencies may require Nicolet to make additions to the ALLL based on their judgments of collectability based on information available to them at the time of their examination.

Income taxes

The assessment of income tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretation, and judgment concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings.

Nicolet files a consolidated federal income tax return and a combined state income tax return (both of which include Nicolet and its wholly owned subsidiaries). Accordingly, amounts equal to tax benefits of those companies having taxable federal losses or credits are reimbursed by the companies that incur federal tax liabilities. Amounts provided for income tax expense are based on income reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently payable under tax laws. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax law rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through provision for income tax expense. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that a portion of the full amount of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. Nicolet may also recognize a liability for unrecognized tax benefits from uncertain tax positions. Unrecognized tax benefits represent the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured in the financial statements. Penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense.

The following discussion is Nicolet management’s analysis of the consolidated financial condition as of June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 and results of operations for the three-monththree and six-month periods ended June 30, 20132014 and 2012.2013. It should be read in conjunction with Nicolet’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2012,2013, included in the Registration Statement.Nicolet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Performance Summary

Nicolet reported net income of $12.2$4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013,2014, compared to $1.2$12.2 million for the comparable periodfirst six months of 2012. Net2013. After $122,000 of preferred stock dividends, first half 2014 net income available to common shareholders for the six monthswas $4.6 million, or $1.08 per diluted common share. Comparatively, after $610,000 of preferred stock dividends, first half 2013 net income available to common shareholders was $11.6 million, or $3.11 per diluted common share,share. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013, given growth in qualifying small business loans, Nicolet qualified for a 1% annual dividend rate on its preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury related to its participation in the Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”), compared to net income available to common shareholders of $0.5 million, or $0.16 per diluted common share, forthe previous 5% annual rate, resulting in the $488,000 reduction in preferred stock dividends between the first six months of 2012.2014 and 2013. Income statement results and average balances for the first half 2014 fully include the 2013 includeacquisitions, while, as noted previously, the first half of 2013 included approximately two months of the Mid-Wisconsin activity (as resultsacquisition only, as well as the related $10.4 million of operations of Mid-Wisconsin prior to consummation are appropriately not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements). Results from the first half 2013 included a bargain purchase gain of $10.4 million and pre-tax non-recurring expenses of approximately $1.7 million specifically related to the consummation and integration of the Mid-Wisconsin transaction.million.

Net interest income was $20.5 million for the first half of 2014, an increase of $5.9 million or 40% over $14.6 million for the first six monthshalf of 2013, an increase of $4.2 million or 40% over the first six months of 2012.2013. The improvement was predominantly volume related, given the timing of the acquisition,2013 acquisitions, but was also favorably impacted by an increase in interest rate spread on higher average earning assets. On a tax-equivalent basis, the net interest margin for the first half 2013of 2014 was 3.74%3.79%, up 205 basis points (“bps”) from 3.54%3.74% for first half 2012.the comparable 2013 period. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 0.91%0.79%, 4812 bps lower than the first half 2012,of 2013, while the average yield on earning assets was 4.49%4.45%, 204 bps lower than first half 2012,2013, resulting in a 28an 8 bps improvement in the interest rate spread.spread between the comparable six-month periods.
 
Loans were $860 million at June 30, 2014, up $13 million or 2% over $847 million at December 31, 2013, and up $19 million or 2% over $841 million at June 30, 2013, up $288 million or 52% over $553 million at December 31, 2012, with $2722013. Removing the $284 million of loans added at acquisition (i.e. removing $272 million from Mid-Wisconsin at acquisition.from both June 30, 2014 and 2013, and $12 million from Bank of Wausau from June 30, 2014), loans grew organically 1% between the first six-month periods. Between the comparative six monthsix-month periods, average loans weregrew 31%, at $851 million in 2014 yielding 5.31%, compared to $651 million in 2013 yielding 5.09%, compared to $495 million in 2012 yielding 5.24%.
 
Total deposits were $908 million$1.01 billion at June 30, 2013, up $2922014, down $24 million or 47% over $616 million2% from $1.03 billion at December 31, 2012, with $346 million of deposits added from Mid-Wisconsin at acquisition, offset in part by2013 (following a customary pattern of deposit decline historically following year ends through the first six-month periods), and up $103 million or 11% over $908 million in total deposits a year ago. Removing the $370 million of deposits added at acquisition (i.e. removing $346 million from Mid-Wisconsin from both June 30, 2014 and 2013, and $24 million net deposits acquired from Bank of Wausau given the quick redemption of $18 million of rate-sensitive certificates of deposit from June 30, 2014), deposits grew organically 14% between the first six-month periods. For perspective,Between the comparative six-month periods, average total deposits grew $368 million since June 30, 2012, $22 million more than the acquired balances. Average total47%, at $1.02 billion in 2014, with interest-bearing deposits for first half 2013 werecosting 0.62%, compared to $699 million compared to $523 million for first half 2012, up 34%in 2013, with interest-bearing deposits costing 0.69%.
 
WhileAsset quality measures were strong at June 30, 2014, though were impacted initially by the merger, asset quality measures remained strong, with nonperforming2013 acquisitions. Nonperforming assets were $8.7 million at June 30, 2014, down 29% from year end 2013 and down 51% from a year ago. Nonperforming assets represented 0.74%, 1.02% and 1.62% of total assets at June 30, 2014, December 31, 2013, compared to 0.97% at year end 2012.and June 30, 2013, respectively. The allowance for loan losses was $7.7$9.6 million or 0.91%1.12% of loans at June 30, 20132014 (impacted by the merger2013 acquisitions adding no allowance for loan losses while adding $272$284 million to loans at acquisition), compared to $7.1$9.2 million or 1.29%1.09%, respectively at December 31, 2012.year end 2013, and $7.7 million or 0.91%, respectively at June 30, 2013. The provision for loan losses was $2.0$1.4 million with net charge offs of $1.4$0.9 million for the first half of 2013,2014, versus provision of $2.4$2.0 million with $2.2$1.4 million of net charge offs for the first half of 2012.comparable 2013 period.
 
Noninterest income was $16.5$6.6 million for the first six months of 2013, up $11.22014 (including $0.3 million overnet gain on sales or writedowns of assets) compared to $16.5 million for the first six monthshalf of 2012, with2013 (including $10.4 million of this variance attributable to the bargain purchase gain recorded in conjunction with the merger.  With the exception of investment advisory fees and net gainsgain on salessale of assets, all other categories werecombined). Removing these net gains, noninterest income was up $0.3 million or 5% between the six-month periods. Notable increases over prior year, largely due to increased business from the prior year, includingexpanded size of the Company, were in service charges (up $0.2$0.3 million or 33%38%), trust fee income (up $0.4$0.3 million or 29%19%), and mortgagebrokerage fee income (up $0.2$0.1 million or 13%50%) comparedand other income (up $0.3 million or 61%, mostly attributable to income from higher debit card volumes). Mortgage income was down $0.9 million or 59% between the first six monthssix-month periods, resulting from a significantly more robust mortgage market a year ago where production was strong until the start of 2012.third quarter 2013 when production slowed dramatically largely in response to rising mortgage rates.
 
Noninterest expense was $15.9$19.1 million for the first six monthshalf of 2013,2014, up $4.1$3.1 million or 20% over the first half of 2012, as the first half of 2013 included approximately two months of increased operations from the Mid-Wisconsin transaction and approximately2013; however, excluding $1.7 million of non-recurring merger-related expenses.  Most notably, salaries and benefits accounted for $2.4 million of the increasemerger-based expenses (of which approximately $1 million was attributable to non-recurring merger expenses),in personnel and Other expenses increased $0.9 million (of which nearly $0.7 million was in other expense) incurred in the 2013 period, expenses were up 35%. The increase in most all noninterest expense line items is predominantly due to the larger operating base from the 2013 acquisitions being fully included in 2014 and only partially included in the first half of 2013. Most notably, between the six-month periods, salaries and benefits were up $1.6 million or 17% (or up 32% excluding the 2013 merger-based expense, given the larger workforce and merit increases between the years), occupancy was up $0.6 million or 42% (given the larger operating base and a harsher winter), office expense was up $0.4 million or 41% (given the larger operating base, as well as continued integration on systems and phones), processing costs were up $0.5 million or 54% (mostly commensurate with growth in the number of accounts), and core deposit intangible amortization increased $0.2 million or 50%, fully attributable to the Mid-Wisconsin merger. Other expense was down $0.7 million, as the 2013 period included $0.7 million of non-recurring merger expenses).merger-based expense.

Net Interest Income

Nicolet’s earnings are substantially dependent on net interest income. Net interest income whichis the primary source of Nicolet’s revenue and is the difference between interest income earned on interest earning assets, such as loans and investments, and loans and the interest paidexpense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities.borrowings. Net interest income is directly impacted by the sensitivity of the balance sheet to changes in interest rates and by the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including characteristics such as the fixed or variable nature of the financial instruments, contractual maturities, and repricing frequencies.

Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 20132014 versus 20122013

Net interest income in the consolidated statements of income (which excludes any taxable equivalent adjustment) was $20.5 million in the first six months of 2014, 40% higher than $14.6 million in the first six months of 2013, compared to $10.4 million in the first half of 2012.2013. Taxable equivalent adjustments (adjustments to bring tax-exempt interest to a level that would yield the same after-tax income had that been subject to a 34% tax rate) were $275,000$329,000 and $316,000$275,000 for the first six months of 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, resulting in taxable equivalent net interest income of $20.8 million and $14.8 million, for first half of 2013 and $10.7 million for first half of 2012.
respectively.
 
Taxable equivalent net interest income is a non-GAAP measure, but is a preferred industry measurement of net interest income (and its use in calculating a net interest margin) as it enhances the comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources.
Net interest income is the primary source of Nicolet’s revenue, and is the difference between interest income on earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income is directly impacted by the sensitivity of the balance sheet to changes in interest rates and by the amount, mix and composition of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including characteristics such as the fixed or variable nature of the financial instruments, contractual maturities, and repricing frequencies.
Tables 1through 51 through 3 present information to facilitate the review and discussion of selected average balance sheet items, taxable equivalent net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin.

Table 1: Year-To-Date Net Interest Income Analysis
                   
  For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2014  2013 
(in thousands) 
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
 
ASSETS                  
Earning assets                  
Loans, including loan fees (1)(2) $851,033  $22,686   5.31% $651,256  $16,658   5.09%
Investment securities                        
Taxable  86,676   833   1.92%  57,508   402   1.40%
Tax-exempt (2)  41,539   609   2.93%  28,889   585   4.05%
Other interest-earning assets  112,790   263   0.47%  51,205   149   0.58%
Total interest-earning assets  1,092,038  $24,391   4.45%  788,858  $17,794   4.49%
Cash and due from banks  36,078           4,449         
Other assets  64,996           59,991         
Total assets $1,193,112          $853,298         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                        
Interest-bearing liabilities                        
Savings $103,854  $128   0.25% $63,812  $98   0.31%
Interest-bearing demand  205,956   752   0.74%  135,395   591   0.88%
MMA  273,851   396   0.29%  197,793   370   0.38%
Core CDs and IRAs  231,590   1,123   0.98%  156,038   851   1.10%
Brokered deposits  43,871   247   1.13%  35,589   116   0.66%
Total interest-bearing deposits  859,122   2,646   0.62%  588,627   2,026   0.69%
Other interest-bearing liabilities  53,722   940   3.48%  61,679   923   2.98%
Total interest-bearing liabilities  912,844   3,586   0.79%  650,306   2,949   0.91%
Noninterest-bearing demand  165,177           110,189         
Other liabilities  7,997           6,656         
Total equity  107,094           86,147         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,193,112          $853,298         
Net interest income and rate spread     $20,805   3.66%     $14,845   3.58%
Net interest margin          3.79%          3.74%
    
  For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2013  2012 
(in thousands) 
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
 
ASSETS                  
Earning assets                  
Loans (1) (2) (3)(4) $651,256  $16,658   5.09% $494,647  $13,065   5.24%
Investment securities                        
Taxable  57,508   402   1.40%  20,802   321   3.09%
Tax-exempt (2)  28,889   585   4.05%  26,423   656   4.96%
Other interest-earning assets  51,205   149   0.58%  56,847   121   0.43%
Total interest-earning assets  788,858  $17,794   4.49%  598,719  $14,163   4.69%
Cash and due from banks  4,449           11,558         
Other assets  59,991           39,603         
Total assets $853,298          $649,880         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                        
Interest-bearing liabilities                        
Savings $63,812  $98   0.31% $26,940  $59   0.44%
Interest-bearing demand  135,395   591   0.88%  84,149   389   0.93%
MMA  197,793   370   0.38%  164,487   402   0.49%
Core CDs and IRAs  156,038   851   1.10%  139,310   1,292   1.86%
Brokered deposits  35,589   116   0.66%  33,197   375   2.27%
Total interest-bearing deposits  588,627   2,026   0.69%  448,083   2,517   1.13%
Other interest-bearing liabilities  61,679   923   2.98%  46,373   927   3.96%
Total interest-bearing liabilities  650,306   2,949   0.91%  494,456   3,444   1.39%
Noninterest-bearing demand  110,189           74,719         
Other liabilities  6,656           4,388         
Total equity  86,147           76,317         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $853,298          $649,880         
Net interest income and rate spread     $14,845   3.58%     $10,719   3.30%
Net interest margin          3.74%          3.54%
(1)Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
Table 2: Year-To-Date Volume/Rate Variance

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus 2013 follows: 
  
Increase (decrease)
Due to Changes in
 
(in thousands) Volume  Rate  Net 
Earning assets         
          
Loans                                                                       $5,296  $732  $6,028 
Investment securities            
Taxable  251   180   431 
Tax-exempt                                                                        213   (189)  24 
Other interest-earning assets  100   14   114 
             
Total interest-earning assets                                                                       $5,860  $737  $6,597 
             
Interest-bearing liabilities            
Savings deposits                                                                       $52  $(22) $30 
Interest-bearing demand                                                                        270   (109)  161 
MMA                                                                        122   (96)  26 
Core CDs and IRAs                                                                        375   (103)  272 
Brokered deposits                                                                        32   99   131 
             
Total interest-bearing deposits                                                                        851   (231)  620 
Other interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        (30)  47   17 
             
Total interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        821   (184)  637 
Net interest income                                                                       $5,039  $921  $5,960 
 
Table 3: Quarterly Net Interest Income Analysis
                   
  For the Three Months Ended June 30, 
  2014  2013 
(in thousands) 
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
 
ASSETS                  
Earning assets                  
Loans, including loan fees (1)(2) $855,315  $11,647   5.40% $754,352  $9,860   5.18%
Investment securities                        
Taxable  85,326   415   1.95%  88,622   275   1.24%
Tax-exempt (2)  46,062   312   2.71%  31,792   309   3.89%
Other interest-earning assets  96,859   128   0.52%  32,580   69   0.85%
Total interest-earning assets  1,083,562  $12,502   4.58%  907,346  $10,513   4.60%
Cash and due from banks  29,367           2,271         
Other assets  64,725           78,244         
Total assets $1,177,654          $987,861         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                        
Interest-bearing liabilities                        
Savings $107,025  $67   0.25% $78,476  $50   0.25%
Interest-bearing demand  208,668   384   0.74%  154,196   286   0.74%
MMA  262,779   185   0.28%  203,043   172   0.34%
Core CDs and IRAs  229,251   614   1.08%  195,713   443   0.91%
Brokered deposits  36,509   115   1.26%  41,876   74   0.71%
Total interest-bearing deposits  844,232   1,365   0.65%  673,304   1,025   0.61%
Other interest-bearing liabilities  50,815   468   3.64%  82,810   515   2.46%
Total interest-bearing liabilities  895,047   1,833   0.82%  756,114   1,540   0.81%
Noninterest-bearing demand  165,909           129,978         
Other liabilities  8,885           7,196         
Total equity  107,813           94,573         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,177,654          $987,861         
Net interest income and rate spread     $10,669   3.76%     $8,973   3.79%
Net interest margin          3.90%          3.92%
(1)           Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   Interest income for the period ending June 30, includes loan fees of $250,000 in 2013, and $115,000 in 2012.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
Table 2:  Volume/Rate Variance
Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 versus 2012:
          
  
Increase (decrease)
Due to Changes in
 
(in thousands) Volume  Rate  Net(3) 
Earning assets         
          
Loans (1)(2)(4)                                                                       $3,959  $(366) $3,593 
Investment securities            
Taxable                                                                        260   (179)  81 
     Tax-exempt (2)                                                                        57   (128)  (71)
Other interest-earning assets                                                                        11   17   28 
             
Total interest-earning assets                                                                       $4,287  $(656) $3,631 
             
Interest-bearing liabilities            
Interest-bearing demand                                                                       $224  $(22) $202 
Savings deposits                                                                        61   (22)  39 
MMA                                                                        72   (104)  (32)
Core CDs and IRAs                                                                        140   (581)  (441)
             
Brokered deposits                                                                        25   (284)  (259)
             
Total interest-bearing deposits                                                                        522   (1,013)  (491)
Other interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        203   (207)  (4)
             
Total interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        725   (1,220)  (495)
Net interest income                                                                       $3,562  $564  $4,126 
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of dollar amounts of change in each.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
Table 3:  Quarterly Net Interest Income Analysis
       
  For the Three Months Ended June 30, 
  2013  2012 
(in thousands) 
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  Interest  
Average
Rate
 
ASSETS                  
Earning assets                  
Loans (1) (2) (3)(4) $754,352  $9,860   5.18% $504,876  $6,570   5.16%
Investment securities                        
Taxable  88,622   275   1.24%  22,249   158   2.84%
Tax-exempt (2)  31,792   309   3.89%  26,118   321   4.91%
Other interest-earning assets  32,580   69   0.85%  35,831   50   0.56%
Total interest-earning assets  907,346  $10,513   4.60%  589,074  $7,099   4.78%
Cash and due from banks  2,271           11,091         
Other assets  78,244           43,001         
Total assets $987,861          $643,166         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                        
Interest-bearing liabilities                        
Savings $78,476  $50   0.25% $29,645  $34   0.46%
Interest-bearing demand  154,196   286   0.74%  87,807   211   0.96%
MMA  203,043   172   0.34%  156,466   181   0.46%
Core CDs and IRAs  195,713   443   0.91%  135,002   606   1.81%
Brokered deposits  41,876   74   0.71%  30,934   112   1.45%
Total interest-bearing deposits  673,304   1,025   0.61%  439,854   1,144   1.05%
Other interest-bearing liabilities  82,810   515   2.46%  47,051   464   3.90%
Total interest-bearing liabilities  756,114   1,540   0.81%  486,905   1,608   1.32%
Noninterest-bearing demand  129,978           75,101         
Other liabilities  7,196           4,797         
Total equity  94,573           76,363         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $987,861          $643,166         
Net interest income and rate spread     $8,973   3.79%     $5,491   3.46%
Net interest margin          3.92%          3.69%
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   Interest income for the period ending June 30, includes loan fees of $170,000 in 2013, and $103,000 in 2012.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
(2)The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
 
Table 4: Quarterly Volume/Rate Variance

Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 versus 2012:
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2014 versus 2013 follows: 
  
Increase (decrease)
Due to Changes in
 
(in thousands) Volume  Rate  Net 
Earning assets         
          
Loans                                                                       $1,343  $444  $1,787 
Investment securities            
Taxable  (1)  141   140 
Tax-exempt                                                                        113   (110)  3 
Other interest-earning assets  44   15   59 
             
Total interest-earning assets $1,499  $490  $1,989 
             
Interest-bearing liabilities            
Savings deposits                                                                       $18  $(1) $17 
Interest-bearing demand  100   (2)  98 
MMA  45   (32)  13 
Core CDs and IRAs  83   88   171 
Brokered deposits  (11)  52   41 
             
Total interest-bearing deposits                                                                        235   105   340 
Other interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        (137)  90   (47)
             
Total interest-bearing liabilities  98   195   293 
Net interest income                                                                       $1,401  $295  $1,696 
          
  
Increase (decrease)
Due to Changes in
 
(in thousands) Volume  Rate  Net(3) 
Earning assets         
          
Loans (1)(2)(4)                                                                       $3,263  $27  $3,290 
Investment securities            
Taxable                                                                        214   (97)  117 
     Tax-exempt (2)                                                                        62   (74)  (12)
Other interest-earning assets                                                                        14   5   19 
             
Total interest-earning assets                                                                       $3,553  $(139) $3,414 
             
Interest-bearing liabilities            
Interest-bearing demand                                                                       $133  $(58) $75 
Savings deposits                                                                        36   (20)  16 
MMA                                                                        46   (55)  (9)
Core CDs and IRAs                                                                        209   (372)  (163)
             
Brokered deposits                                                                        31   (69)  (38)
             
Total interest-bearing deposits                                                                        455   (574)  (119)
Other interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        211   (160)  51 
             
Total interest-bearing liabilities                                                                        666   (734)  (68)
Net interest income                                                                       $2,887  $595  $3,482 
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of dollar amounts of change in each.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans

Table 5: Interest Rate Spread, Margin and Average Balance Mix — Taxable-Equivalent Basis

                        
  
Six Months Ended June 30,
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
 2013   2012  2014  2013 
(in thousands) Average
Balance
   % of
Earning
Assets
   Yield/Rate  Average
Balance
  % of
Earning
Assets
  Yield/Rate  
Average
Balance
  
% of
Earning
Assets
  Yield/Rate  
Average
Balance
  
% of
Earning
Assets
  Yield/Rate 
Total loans $651,256   82.6%  5.09% $494,647   82.6%  5.24% $851,033   77.9%  5.31% $651,256   82.6%  5.09%
                        
Securities and other earning assets  137,602   17.4%  1.65%  104,072   17.4%  2.11%  241,005   22.1%  1.42%  137,602   17.4%  1.65%
Total interest-earning assets $788,858   100%  4.49% $598,719   100%  4.69% $1,092,038   100%  4.45% $788,858   100%  4.49%
                                                
Interest-bearing liabilities $650,306   82.4%  0.91% $494,456   82.6%  1.39% $912,844   83.6%  0.79% $650,306   82.4%  0.91%
                        
Noninterest-bearing funds, net  138,552   17.6%      104,263   17.4%      179,194   16.4%      138,552   17.6%    
Total funds sources $788,858   100%  0.75% $598,719   100%  1.15% $1,092,038   100%  0.66% $788,858   100%  0.75%
                        
Interest rate spread          3.58%          3.30%          3.66%          3.58%
Contribution from net free funds          0.16%          0.24%          0.13%          0.16%
Net interest margin          3.74%          3.54%          3.79%          3.74%
 
Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $14.8$20.8 million for the first six months of 2013,2014, an increase of $4.1$6.0 million or 38%40% over the same period in 2012.2013. The $4.1 million increase in taxable-equivalent net interest income was predominantly volume related, given the timing of the acquisition,acquisitions, but was also favorably impacted by an increase in interest rate spread on higher average earning assets.spread. Taxable equivalent interest income increased $3.6$6.6 million (or 37%) between the six-month periods driven by loans (including $4.0$5.3 million more interest income from higher loan volumes and $0.7 million from higher loan volumes, less $0.4 million from loweryields, aided by higher levels of purchase-accounting loan yields)accretion on acquired loans). Interest expense fell $0.5increased only $0.6 million (or 22%) between the six-month periods due to beneficial growth in the mix of lower-costing funds (with $1.2 million less interest expense from favorable rate changes, but $0.7driven mainly by interest-bearing deposits (including $0.8 million more interest expense from higher interest-bearing liabilities volume).volumes, offset by $0.2 million less interest expense from lower deposit rates.)
 
The taxable-equivalent net interest margin was 3.74%3.79% for the six months of 2014, up 5 bps over the first six months of 2013, up 20 bps over the first half of 2012, with improvementa decrease in the cost of funds at 0.91%to 0.79% (down 4812 bps), offset partly by a lower earning asset yield at 4.49%of 4.45% (down 204 bps) and an 8a 3 bps decrease in net free funds. The cost of funds between the six-month periods has benefited from a lower rate structure acquired with the 2013 acquisitions and rate reductions made particularly in commercial deposit products. In general, there has been and will continue to be considerableunderlying downward margin pressure as assets mature in this prolonged low-rate environment, with current reinvestment rates substantially lower than previous rates and less opportunity to offset such with similar changes in the already low cost of funds.funds; however, in 2014 such pressure continues to be mitigated partly by the favorable income from acquired loans.
 
The earning asset yield was comprisedinfluenced mainly ofby loans, representing 82.6%78% of average earning assets and yielding 5.09%5.31% for first half 2013,six months of 2014, compared to 82.6%83% and 5.24%5.09%, respectively, for the first half 2012, butsix months of 2013. The 22 bps improvement in loan yield between the six-month periods was aided in 2013part by the timing of the acquisition and the positive rate profile of acquired loans. If acquired loans marked to estimated fair value at acquisition resolve or performThe earning asset yield was also supported by a higher mix of investments (representing 12% versus 11% of average earning assets between the six-month periods) which yield more favorably than originally anticipated, there isother interest earning assets (representing 10% versus 6% of average earning assets, and will continue to be potential for favorable loan yield adjustments.which carried a higher proportion of low-earning cash in the first half of 2014 versus 2013). All other interest earning assets combined yielded 1.65%1.42%, down 4623 bps compared to the first half 2012, but aided inof 2013, by amainly from the higher mix of investments (representing 11.0% of average earning assets, compared to 7.9% for first half 2012) that earn more than the other cash-equivalent earning assets.low-earning cash noted above.
 
Nicolet’s cost of funds continued its favorable decline during the low-rate environment, at 0.91%0.79% for the first halfsix months of 2013, 482014, 12 bps lower than the first half 2012.six months of 2013. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits (which represent over 90% of average interest-bearing liabilities for both years)periods), was 0.69%0.62% for the first halfsix months of 2013,2014, down 447 bps versus the first half 2012,six months of 2013, with favorable rate variances in all deposit categories and higher mix of balances in lower-costingexcept brokered deposits. Lower-costing transactional deposits (savings, checking and MMA). saw rate declines in response to reductions made across products between the years, while such balances continued to rise. Average brokered deposit balances remained stableincreased nominally for the comparable six-month periods however,but their cost decreasedincreased from 2.27% in 2012 to 0.66% in 2013 to 1.13% in 2014, as a significant portion of the higher rate brokered deposit balances matured since June 30, 2012, and werelonger-termed funding replaced withmaturing shorter-term less-costly brokereds in anticipation of the merger and seasonal deposit declines.instruments. The cost of other interest-bearing liabilities (comprised of short- and long-term borrowings) decreasedincreased to 2.98%3.48%, down 98up 50 bps between the six-month periods, mainly from increased usage of2013 favorable rates on short-term advances, at favorable ratesprepayment in addition to the prepayment2013 of $10 million in higher-costing advances, duringand the first quarter 2013 and the acquisition at fair value of a lower-rate junior subordinated debenture in second quarter 2013.debenture.
 
Average interest-earning assets were $789 million$1.1 billion for the first halfsix months of 2013, $1902014, $303 million or 32%38% higher than the first halfsix months of 2012,2013, led by a $157$200 million increase in average loans (to $651$851 million or 83%78% of interest earning assets) and a $39$103 million increase in average investmentsall other interest-earning assets combined (to $86$241 million or 11%22% of earning assets), both heavily influenced by the size and timing of the acquisition in 2013.2013 acquisitions, and a higher level of low-earning cash balances.
 
Average interest-bearing liabilities were $650$913 million, up $156$263 million or 32%40% over the first halfsix months of 2012,2013, led by a $138$262 million increase in non-brokered interest-bearing deposits (to $553$815 million or 85%89% of average interest-bearing liabilities), an $8 million increase in average brokered deposits (to $44 million), and a $15an $8 million increasedecrease in average other interest-bearing liabilities (to $62$54 million), both heavily influenced by the size and timing of the acquisitionacquisitions in 2013.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $1.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively, exceeding net charge offs of $0.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Asset quality trends remained relatively strong with continued resolutions of problem loans. The ALLL was $9.6 million (1.12% of loans) at June 30, 2014, compared to $9.2 million (1.09% of loans) at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $2.0notably higher than $7.7 million and $2.4 million respectively.  The provision for loan losses has been trending down, with asset quality trends improving in the non-acquired portfolio (primarily from work-outs(0.91% of problem loans and declining net charge-offs), as well as credit discounts being included directly in the estimated fair value of recently acquired loans (and accordingly no allowance for loan losses recorded at acquisition).   At December 31, 2012, the ALLL was $7.1 million which grew to $7.7 millionloans) at June 30, 2013, givenwhich was shortly after the $2.0 million provision for loan losses and net charge offsacquisition of $1.4 million during the first six months of 2013.Mid-Wisconsin. The ALLL to loans ratio was impacted most after each of the ALLL to total loans was 0.91%2013 acquisitions, which combined at June 30, 2013, impacted most notably by the 2013their acquisition whichdates added no allowance for loan lossesALLL to the numerator (as noted above) and $272$284 million of loans into the denominator as of the date of acquisition.denominator. As events occur in the acquired loan portfolio,portfolios, an ALLL will be established for this pool of assets as appropriate. Comparatively,Growth in the ALLL to total loans was 1.29% at December 31, 2012.ratio is mostly a result of the provision for loan losses exceeding net charge offs.

Nonperforming loans continue to improve. Nonperforming loans were improvingdeclining prior to the acquisition,acquisitions, starting at $7.0 million (or 1.3% of total loans) at December 31, 2012, decreasing to $2.7 million (or 0.5% of loans) at March 31, 2013, and then increasedincreasing to $14.3a high of $17.4 million (or 1.7%2.0% of loans) at September 30, 2013, and declining to $7.2 million (or 0.84% of loans) at June 30, 2013.  The $11.62014. Of the nonaccrual loans initially acquired in the 2013 acquisitions, $5.3 million increase from March 31 toremain which is included in the $7.2 million of nonaccruals at June 30, 2013, included approximately $10.9 million of acquired loans brought on in a nonaccruing and impaired status at acquisition.
2014.

The provision for loan losses is predominantly a function of Nicolet’s methodology and judgment as to qualitative and quantitative factors used to determine the adequacy of the ALLL. The adequacy of the ALLL is affected by changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, historical losses and delinquencies in each portfolio segment, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing and future economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other factors which could affect potential credit losses. For additional information regarding asset quality and the ALLL, see “Balance Sheet Analysis — Loans,” “— Allowance for Loan and “Balance Sheet Analysis —Lease Losses,” and “— Impaired Loans and Nonperforming Assets.
 
Noninterest Income

Table 6: Noninterest Income
                        
 For the three months ended June 30,  For the six months ended June 30,  For the three months ended June 30,  For the six months ended June 30, 
 2013  2012  $ Change  % Change  2013  2012  $ Change  % Change  2014  2013  $ Change  % Change  2014  2013  $ Change  % Change 
(in thousands)                                                
Service charges on deposit accounts
 $470  $280  $190   67.9% $754  $567  $187   33.0% $544  $470  $74   15.7% $1,038  $754  $284   37.7%
Trust services fee income
  1,074   724   350   48.3   1,876   1,454   422   29.0   1,119   1,074   45   4.2   2,224   1,876   348   18.6 
Mortgage income
  714   671   43   6.4   1,586   1,408   178   12.6   431   714   (283)  (39.6)  646   1,586   (940)  (59.3)
Brokerage fee income
  115   81   34   42.0   217   165   52   31.5   166   115   51   44.3   326   217   109   50.2 
Gain on sale of assets, net
  45   237   (192)  (81.0)  49   383   (334)  (87.2)
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)
  212   183   29   15.8   381   336   45   13.4   220   212   8   3.8   434   381   53   13.9 
Rent income
  274   240   34   14.2   524   480   44   9.2   288   274   14   5.1   588   524   64   12.2 
Investment advisory fees
  76   85   (9)  (10.6)  162   171   (9)  (5.3)  102   76   26   34.2   212   162   50   30.9 
Bargain purchase gain
  10,435   -   10,435   100.0   10,435   -   10,435   100.0 
Other
  351   176   175   99.4   538   337   201   59.6 
Gain on sale or writedown of assets, net  (442)  45   (487)  N/M*  308   49   259   N/M*
Bargain purchase gain (“BPG”)  -   10,435   (10,435)  N/M*  -   10,435   (10,435)  N/M*
Other income  452   351   101   28.8   864   538   326   60.6 
Total noninterest income
 $13,766  $2,677  $11,089   414.2% $16,522  $5,301  $11,221   211.7% $2,880  $13,766  $(10,886)  (79.1)% $6,640  $16,522  $(9,882)  (59.8)%
Noninterest income without BPG and net gains $3,322  $3,286  $36   1.1% $6,332  $6,038  $294   4.9%
*N/M means not meaningful.

Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 20132014 versus 20122013

Noninterest income was $6.6 million for the first six months of 2014 (including $0.3 million of net gain on sales of assets), compared to $16.5 million for the six monthsfirst half of 2013 an increase(including $10.5 million of $11.2 million from 2012 or 211.7%, with a $10.4 millioncombined bargain purchase gain included inand net gain on sale of assets). Removing these net gains, noninterest income was up $0.3 million or 4.9% between the second quarter 2013.  six-month periods.

The bargain purchase gain recognized from the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition was calculated as the net difference in the fair value of the net assets acquired of $20.6 million less the consideration paidpaid. Net gain on sale or writedown of $10.2assets was $0.3 million resulting inand $49,000 for the net bargain purchasesix months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The 2014 activity consisted of a $0.3 million gain on the sale of $10.4 million.  The details of the acquisition accounting are located in Note 2 of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.  Without the bargain purchase gain, noninterest income was up $0.8an equity security holding, a $0.6 million or 14.8% between the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, impacted mostly by the size and timing of the Mid-Wisconsin transaction but offset partly by a negative swing in net gain on assets soldsales of OREO, and a $0.6 million write-down of an acquired former branch building moved to OREO in second quarter 2014. The 2013 activity consisted of $0.3 million.million of net gains on OREO sales, offset by $0.2 million net losses on sales of investments (mainly the result of selling a large portion of the acquired investment portfolio in second quarter to prepay higher costing debt assumed in the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition).

Service feescharges on deposit accounts were $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, up $0.2 million (or 33.0%) over the first six months of 2012.  The increase is primarily from increased service charges on deposits given the increase in deposit balances and accounts mainly from the merger, and higher non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees.
Trust service fees increased to $1.9$1.0 million for the first six months of 2013,2014, up $0.4$0.3 million or 29.0%37.7% over the comparable period of 2013. The increase resulted from greater service charges on deposits given the higher deposit balances and number of accounts from the acquisitions and from higher non-sufficient funds fees.

Trust service fees increased to $2.2 million for the first half 2012.six months of 2014, up $0.3 million or 18.6% over the comparable 2013 period. In addition to the larger base of customers acquired through the merger, there was continued market improvement over last year on assets under management, on which fees are based. Similarly, brokerage fees were $0.2$0.3 million, up $52,000$0.1 million or 31.5%50.2% over the first half 2012, mainlysix months of 2013, from increased legacy business, market improvements and to a lesser degree from the merger. TheManagement believes the expanded footprint of the bank willshould provide growth potential for wealth management in future periods.

Mortgage income represents net gains received from the sale of residential real estate loans service-released into the secondary market and to a small degree, some related income. Residential refinancing activity and new purchase activity continues to remainremained steady despite mortgage rates being higher than a year ago and trending upward.  Mortgage income was $1.6 million for the first six months of 2013; however, mortgage production slowed considerably during the last half of 2013 up $0.2and into 2014, largely in response to rising mortgage rates and certain mortgage regulation changes. As a result, mortgage income in the first six months of 2014 was $0.6 million or 12.6% overcompared to $1.6 million for the first half of 2012, though slowing slightly for2013. While business has picked up in the second versus first quarter of 2014, levels still trail 2013. The increasechange between six-month periods was not significantly impacted by the acquisition.acquisitions.

DuringThe remaining income categories included modest first half 2014 increases compared to the first half of 2013, Nicolet recognized a $49,000 net gain on sale of assets in the first six months of 2013 compared to $383,000 net gain in the comparable period of 2012.  The activity in 2013 consisted of $239,000 of net losses on sales of investments (mainly the result of selling a large portion of the acquired investment portfolio in second quarter to prepay higher costing debt assumed in the merger), more than offset by $288,000 of net gains on sales of OREO (as properties were resolved at better than expected terms).   Investments were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition but an increase in rates during second quarter resulted in additional market declines realized on investments sold during the second quarter related to planned balance sheet reductions.  For the first six months of 2012, securities sales produced net gains of $440,000, while net losses on OREO were $57,000.
2013. BOLI income was $0.4 million for the first six months of 2013,2014, up $45,000$53,000 or 13.9% from the comparable period in 2012, or 13.4%, mainly from2013 as a result of the timing of additional BOLI procured.  New BOLI investment of $3.8 million was procured in the first quarter 2012 and $4.3 million wasincrease of BOLI acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction (bringing the 2013 six-month averagetransaction. An additional $2.8 million of BOLI investment to $20.4 million, up 21% overwas purchased during June 2014 but given the comparable period last year).timing did not impact the 2014 year-to-date average balance. Rent income, investment advisory fees and other noninterest income combined were $1.7 million for the first six months of 2014 compared to $1.2 million for the first half ofcomparable 2013 compared to $1.0 million for the first half 2012,period, with the majority of the increase due to ancillary fees tied to deposit-related products, most particularly debit card, check cashing and wire fee income.
 
Noninterest Expense

Table 7: Noninterest Expense
                     
 For the three months ended June 30,  For the six months ended June 30,  For the three months ended June 30,  For the six months ended June 30, 
 2013  2012  $ Change  % Change  2013  2012  $ Change  % Change  2014  2013  $ Change  % Change  2014  2013  $ Change  % Change 
(in thousands)                                                
Salaries and employee benefits
 $5,555  $3,393  $2,162   63.7% $9,114  $6,666  $2,448   36.7% $5,384  $5,555  $(171)  (3.1)% $10,679  $9,114  $1,565   17.2%
Occupancy, equipment and office
  1,466   1,102   364   33.0   2,570   2,241   329   14.7   1,737   1,466   271   18.5   3,635   2,570   1,065   41.4 
Business development and marketing  473   352   121   34.4   898   697   201   28.8 �� 537   473   64   13.5   1,072   898   174   19.4 
Data processing
  572   410   162   39.5   995   812   183   22.5   775   572   203   35.5   1,529   995   534   53.7 
FDIC assessments
  130   138   (8)  (5.8)  240   274   (34)  (12.4)  203   130   73   56.2   387   240   147   61.3 
Core deposit intangible amortization
  286   168   118   70.2   434   336   98   29.2   315   286   29   10.1   650   434   216   49.8 
Other
  1,104   446   658   147.5   1,675   768   907   118.1   533   1,104   (571)  (51.7)  1,120   1,675   (555)  (33.1)
Total noninterest expense
 $9,586  $6,009  $3,577   59.5% $15,926  $11,794  $4,132   35.0% $9,484  $9,586  $(102)  (1.1)% $19,072  $15,926  $3,146   19.8%

Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 20132014 versus 20122013
 
Total noninterest expense was $19.1 million for the first six months ending June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $15.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively,of 2014, up $4.1$3.1 million, or 35.0%, as19.8% over the first half of 2013 included approximately twosix months of increased operations from2013; however, excluding the Mid-Wisconsin transaction and approximately $1.7 million of non-recurring merger-related expenses.  Most notably, salaries and benefits accounted for $2.4 million of the increasemerger-based expenses (of which approximately $1 million was attributable to non-recurring merger expenses, such as stay bonuses, severancesin personnel and related payroll taxes), and other expense increased $0.9 million (of which nearly $0.7 million was attributablein other expense) incurred in the 2013 period, expenses were up 35%. The increase in most all noninterest expense line items is predominantly due to non-recurring merger expenses, predominantly legal or consultantthe larger operating base from the 2013 acquisitions being fully included in nature for consummation2014 and integration).only partially included in the first half of 2013.
 
Salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $2.4was $10.7 million or 36.7%, overfor the first half of 2012, with approximately $12014, up $1.6 million attributable to nonrecurring merger-related costs as noted above.or 17.2% (or up 32.1% excluding the 2013 non-recurring merger-based expense), over the comparable 2013 period. The increase was otherwise commensurate withpartially attributable to the growing workforce from the acquisitions (though less than a one-to-one increase as a result of realization of operating efficiencies) and was also impacted by merit increases between the years, higher health insurance premiums, and higher overtime in preparation for the merger.increased 401k expense. Average full time equivalent employees for the first half of 2014 were 289, up 28% versus 226 for the comparable 2013 were 226, versus 158 for first half 2012 (up 43%).period.

Occupancy, equipment and office expense increased $0.3$1.1 million to $2.6$3.6 million for the first six months of 20132014 compared to first half 2012.2013. This 14.7%41.4% increase is in line with the addition of 1112 branches from the acquisitions which nearlymore than doubled ourthe physical facilities and depreciation expense for two of the first six months in 2013.related expenses. Utilities, rent, snowplowing, and other occupancy expenses increased proportionately in conjunction with the merger.acquisitions, however, a harsher 2014 winter, continued integration on systems and phones, and postage resulted in higher expense between the six-month periods.
 
Business development and marketing expense increased $0.2 million between the comparable six-month periods. This 19.4% increase includes a greater focus on growth in new markets, including television costs, and higher expense on promotional materials.
Data processing expenses, which are primarily volume-based, rose $0.5 million or 53.7% between the six-month periods, in line with the increase in number of accounts and continued integration of systems. FDIC assessments increased by $0.1 million, mainly given the increase in assets (on which the assessments are based) between the six-month periods. Core deposit intangible amortization increased $0.2 million, attributable to the core deposit intangible recorded with the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition.

Other expense decreased $0.6 million (or 33.1%) to $1.1 million for the first six months of 2014. The first half of 2013 carried non-recurring merger-based expenses (mainly consulting and legal fees) of $0.7 million; without these direct costs, other expense increased modestly by $0.1 million, with the largest variance being an $89,000 increase in foreclosure and OREO expense given the higher amount of OREO acquired and worked.
Income Taxes

For the first six months of 2014, income tax expense was $1.9 million compared to $1.0 million for the same period of 2013. Tax expense for 2014 includes a $0.5 million tax benefit recorded to the deferred tax asset in the second quarter due to the increased ability to utilize net operating losses under the Internal Revenue Code section 382 following the one-year evaluation period related to the acquisition. Tax expense for the first six months of 2013 increased $0.2was influenced by the $10 million compared to the same period in 2012.  This 28.8% increase was a result of the greater focus on growth in loans, sales seminars and events, higher charitable donations in 2013, and merger-related travel and business development costs.
Data processing, FDIC assessments and core deposit intangible amortization combined increased from $1.4 million for the first six months in 2012 to $1.7 million for the same period in 2013.  Core deposit intangible amortization increased given the new $4.0 million core deposit intangible recorded at acquisition being amortized over a 10-year period.  Data processing expenses (which are primarily volume based) rose individually 22.5%, in line with two months of increased size.  FDIC assessments declined slightly (down $34,000) despite the rise in assets as Nicolet experienced a reduction in the assessment rate beginning in first quarter 2013.
Other expense increased $0.9 million for the first half of 2013, compared to the same time period in 2012.  Legal, consulting, and accounting fees combined accounted for $0.7 million of the increase and were predominantlybargain purchase gain related to the merger activity. The remaining increase is primarily from higher foreclosure expenses and higher insurance costs related to Nicolet’s increased size and public nature.
Income Taxes
For the first six months of 2013 income tax expense was $1.0 million compared to $0.4 for the same period of 2012.  The effective tax rates were 7.3% and 24.4% for first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, influenced largely by the bargain purchase gainMid-Wisconsin acquisition which was a tax free transaction. The effective tax rate was 28% for the first six monthshalf of 2013 without2014 compared to 7% for the same period in 2013. Excluding the deferred tax adjustment and the bargain purchase gain, would have been 34.7%.effective tax rates were approximately 35% for both six-month periods. GAAP requires that deferred income taxes be analyzed to determine if a valuation allowance is required. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. No valuation allowance was determined to be necessary.necessary as of June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

Comparison of the three months ending June 30, 20132014 versus 20122013
 
Nicolet reported net income of $11.5$2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013,2014, compared to $0.6$11.5 million for the comparable period of 2012,2013, with second quarter 2013 including the $10.4 million bargain purchase gain and approximately $1.5 million of non-recurring pre-tax merger-related expenses. Net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 20132014 was $11.2$2.5 million, or $2.78$0.58 per diluted common share, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $0.3$11.2 million, or $0.09$2.78 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2012.2013. Income statement results and average balances for second quarter 2013 include approximately two months of activity from Mid-Wisconsin.Mid-Wisconsin, while those for the second quarter of 2014 include fully the results of both the Mid-Wisconsin and Bank of Wausau acquisitions.
 
Taxable equivalent net interest income was $9.0$10.7 million for second quarter 2013,2014, up $3.5$1.7 million or 65.3%19% over second quarter 2012,2013, with $2.9$1.4 million of the increase fromdue to volume variances (givenfrom the larger post-merger balance sheet following the acquisition), and $0.6$0.3 million improvement from rate variances (predominantly from lower cost of funds between the comparable quarters).driven by a higher loan yield.
 
For the second quarter of 2013, theThe earning asset yield was 4.60%, 184.58% for second quarter 2014, 2 bps lower than the second quarter of last year,2013, mainly due to a decline in the yield on non-loan earning assets (whichwhich had a combined cost 1.71%yield of 1.50%, down 8021 bps from second quarter 2012), and pressured additionally2013. The earning asset yield was also influenced by the non-loan earning assets (which earn less than loans) representingasset mix which represented a higher percentage of average earning assets (to 16.9%(21% for first half 2013second quarter 2014 versus 14.3%17% for first half 2012).second quarter 2013) and carried a higher proportion of low-earning cash between the three-month periods. Loans yielded 5.18%5.40%, up 222 bps over the second quarter 2012,2013, aided mostly by the timing of the acquisition and the positive rate profile of acquired loans.
 
Between the second quarter periods, the cost of funds declined 51 bpsincreased 1 bp to 0.81%0.82% in 20132014 versus 1.32%2013. This relatively unchanged position is due to a higher proportion of interest bearing liabilities in 2012.  Allour lower costing transaction-based deposits (i.e. savings, checking and MMA balances combined represented 65% of average interest bearing liabilities versus 58%, and all showed equal or lower rates than the year ago period in response to rate reductions made to related products). Rates on all term-based funding categories showed significantly lower rates(i.e. core CDs and IRAs, brokered deposits and other wholesale funding) rose between the second quarter periods, asthough their combined balances represented 35% of average interest bearing liabilities versus 42% in the majoritysecond quarter 2013. A portion of brokered deposits and other wholesale funds were paid down post-acquisition (with second quarter 2013 carrying a $0.2 million recovery of prepayment penalty on delayed payoff of acquired FHLB advances), and those renewed were generally at extended maturities, offor interest rate risk considerations, at higher costingrates. Core CDs or wholesale debt were renewed in full or in part into shorter-term, lower-costing funding, and rates offered on many transaction deposit products (within savings, checking and MMA) were lowered by Nicolet over the year since June 30, 2012. Average other interest-bearing liabilities (consisting primarily of FHLB advances, junior subordinated debentures and notes payable) increased $35.8 millionIRAs cost more between the second quarter periods, as approximately 80%largely from the conclusion in February 2014 of Mid-Wisconsin debt acquired was paid off during the quarter and thus inflated the average balance of second quarter 2013. FHLB advances acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction were marked ata favorable fair value assuming immediate payoff; however, they were repaid later in the second quarter, with the most notable result being a $0.2 million ‘recovery’ of prepayment penalty recorded in other expense as required by accounting standards.mark on acquired CDs.
 
Noninterest income was $13.8$2.9 million for second quarter 2014 as compared to $13.8 million for the second quarter 2013, and(or $3.3 million without the bargain purchase gain). Mortgage fee income was down $0.3 million due to lower production. Net gain was $3.3 million, compared to $2.7 millionon sale or writedown of assets for second quarter 2012.  Aside from investment advisory fees and the lower2014 consisted of a $0.6 million writedown of an acquired former branch building moved to OREO offset by a $0.2 million net gain on OREO resolutions, while second quarter 2013 included $0.3 million of net gains on saleOREO sales offset by $0.2 million net losses on sales of assets, all otherinvestments (mainly the result of selling a large portion of the acquired investment portfolio in second quarter to prepay higher costing debt assumed in the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition). The remaining noninterest income categories increased mainlywere comparable between the second quarters, in light of being athe larger institution with increased volumes.  Other income for second quarteroperating base and timing of 2013 nearly doubled to $0.4 million versus the second quarter of 2012, mainly due to higher fee income ancillary to deposit activity (such as debit cards, wires and checking cashing, and safe deposit boxes) given our increased size.acquisitions.
 
Noninterest expense was $9.6$9.5 million for the second quarter of 2013, up $3.62014, down $0.1 million overfrom second quarter 2012, including approximately2013; however, excluding the $1.5 million of non-recurring merger-based expenses (approximately $1 million in personnel costs and $0.5 million other expenses) incurred in the 2013 period, expenses were up 16.7%, reflecting proportionate increases as a result of the timing and size of the merger.  For2013 acquisitions. Salaries and employee benefits declined slightly between the second quarter periods, but were up 18.2% excluding the impact of the above-noted merger costs, and reflective of only two months of merged activity in 2013 and merit increases between the years. Period end full time equivalent employees have remained nearly unchanged from June 30, 2013 to June 30, 2014. FDIC assessments were down 5.8% minimallyup 56.2% from the prior year but increased from the first quarter of 2013 by $20,000 as a result of the larger asset size.size upon which assessments are based. Other expenses include(including legal, consulting and audit expense and increased $0.7expense) decreased $0.6 million forbetween the second quarter of 2013 when comparedperiods, primarily due to the above-noted merger costs in the 2013 period. The remaining expense categories reflected proportional increases, considering second quarter 2013 only included two months of 2012.  These expenses included approximately $0.4 million in the second quarter alone with the primary expense related to the payment of the investment banker on consummation of the merger.  Additional consulting and legal expenses were up $0.1 million when compared to the first quarter of 2013 and represented approximately $0.6 million in total for the year.  We did realize a net gain on repayment of FHLB advances of $0.2 million as a result of incurring less prepayment penalty than determined at the time of merger due to a slight lag in paying off the debt, however much of this was captured in increased interest expenses while we maintained the advances.merged activity.
 
The provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0.7 million and 2012 was $1.0 million and $1.1 million respectively.  At June 30, 2013, the ALLL was $7.7 million (or 0.91% of total loans) compared to $6.0 million (or 1.19% of total loans) at June 30, 2012. Net charge offs for the quarter ending June 30, 20132014 were $0.9$0.3 million compared to $1.1$0.9 million for the same period in 2012.2013. At June 30, 2014, the ALLL was $9.6 million (or 1.12% of total loans) compared to $7.7 million (or 0.91% of total loans) at June 30, 2013.

Income tax expense was $0.5$0.6 million and $0.2$0.5 million for the second quarters of 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. The effective tax rates were 4.5% (or 34.4% when removing19.9% for second quarter 2014 (impacted by the impact of$0.5 million tax benefit recorded to the deferred tax free bargain purchase gain)asset in the quarter related to net operating loss utilization potential) and 4.5% for second quarter 2013 and 26.5% for second quarter 2012.        (impacted by the tax free nature of the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition).

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
 
Loans
 
Nicolet services a diverse customer base throughout Northeast and Central Wisconsin and in Menominee, Michigan including the following industries: manufacturing, agriculture, wholesaling, retail, service, and businesses supporting the general building industry. It continues to concentrate its efforts in originating loans in its local markets and assisting its current loan customers. It actively utilizes government loan programs such as those provided by the U.S. Small Business Administration to help customers weather current economic conditions and position their businesses for the future.
 
Nicolet’s primary lending function is to make commercial loans, consisting of commercial and industrial business loans, agricultural production, and owner-occupied commercial real estate loans; commercial real estate (“CRE”)CRE loans, consisting of commercial investment real estate loans, agricultural real estate, and construction and land development loans; residential real estate loans, including residential first mortgages, residential junior mortgages (such as home equity loans and lines), and to a lesser degree residential construction loans; and retail and other loans.
 
Total loans were $841$860 million at June 30, 20132014 compared to $553$847 million at December 31, 2012.2013. This balance included acquired loans of $272$13 million at acquisition, representing a net increase of $16 million of originated loans.  The increase was largely due to strong loanrepresented 2% growth in the second quarterfirst half of $272014 and $20 million offsettingor 2% growth over the $11balance at June 30, 2013. Removing the $284 million decrease which occurred inof loans added at acquisition (i.e. removing $272 million from Mid-Wisconsin from both June 30, 2014 and 2013, and $12 million from Bank of Wausau from June 30, 2014), loans grew organically 1% between the first quarter versus year end 2012.June 30 periods.
 
Table 8: Period End Loan Composition
     June 30, 2014  December 31, 2013  June 30, 2013 
 For the three months ended,  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
 
 June 30, 2013  March 31, 2013  December 31, 2012  September 30, 2012  June 30, 2012 
(in thousands) Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial $245,856   29.3% $193,288   35.7% $197,301   35.8% $201,049   36.8% $199,028   38.5% $269,377   31.3% $253,674   29.9% $245,856   29.3%
Agricultural production  13,114   1.6   219   -   215   -   315   0.1   183   - 
Owner-occupied CRE
  181,101   21.5   107,523   19.8   106,888   19.3   105,585   19.3   115,170   22.3   187,225   21.8   187,476   22.1   181,101   21.5 
Total commercial loans  440,071   52.4   301,030   55.5   304,404   55.1   306,949   56.2   314,381   60.8 
Agricultural real estate  38,983   4.6   9,866   1.8   11,354   2.1   1,201   0.2   1,281   0.2 
Ag production  13,982   1.6   14,256   1.7   13,114   1.6 
Ag real estate  41,934   4.9   37,057   4.4   38,983   4.6 
CRE investment
  117,264   14.0   73,410   13.5   76,618   13.9   76,773   14.1   62,857   12.2   79,639   9.3   90,295   10.7   117,264   14.0 
Construction & land development  37,754   4.5   22,286   4.1   21,791   3.9   26,964   4.9   24,612   4.8   45,504   5.3   42,881   5.1   37,754   4.5 
Total CRE loans
  194,001   23.1   105,562   19.4   109,763   19.9   104,938   19.2   88,750   17.2 
Residential construction  10,288   1.2   7,445   1.4   7,957   1.4   7,670   1.4   5,961   1.2   11,895   1.4   12,535   1.5   10,288   1.2 
Residential first mortgage  141,255   16.8   86,202   15.9   85,588   15.5   79,543   14.6   63,156   12.2   154,713   18.0   154,403   18.2   141,255   16.8 
Residential junior mortgage  48,929   5.8   39,026   7.2   39,352   7.1   40,928   7.5   38,082   7.4   50,244   5.8   49,363   5.8   48,929   5.8 
Total residential real estate loans  200,472   23.8   132,673   24.5   132,897   24.0   128,141   23.5   107,199   20.8 
Retail & other
  6,002   0.7   2,859   0.6   5,537   1.0   5,680   1.1   6,662   1.2   5,573   0.6   5,418   0.6   6,002   0.7 
Total loans
 $840,546   100.0% $542,124   100.0% $552,601   100.0% $545,708   100.0% $516,992   100.0% $860,086   100% $847,358   100% $840,546   100%
 
TotalBroadly, commercial-based loans (i.e. commercial, agricultural, CRE and total CREconstruction loans combinedcombined) versus retail-based loans (i.e. residential real estate and other retail loans) were 75.5%unchanged at 74% commercial-based and 26% retail-based at June 30, 2013 compared to 74.9% of the total loan portfolio at2014 and December 31, 2012.  Mid-Wisconsin had a higher proportion of CRE2013. Commercial-based loans thus post-merger total CRE rose to 23.1% at June 30, 2013 compared to 19.9% at December 31, 2012 while total commercial loans declined to 52.4% versus 55.1% for the respective periods.  All commercial loans (commercial and CRE combined) are considered to have more inherent risk of default than residential mortgage or retailretail-based loans, in part because the commercial balance per borrower is typically larger than that for residential and mortgageretail-based loans, implying higher potential losses on an individual customer basis, and the underlying dependence of the commercial borrower’s success on many influences such as health of the economy, real estate values, and efficient business practices.basis.
 
TotalCommercial and industrial loans consist primarily of commercial loans were 52.4% of total loans at June 30, 2013.  The increase in commercial loan balances from June 2012 to June 2013 has resulted primarily from the acquisition, but also renewed loan demand from business borrowers based on cautious optimism for improving economic conditions versussmall businesses and, to a year ago.   The increase in agricultural production loans was almost entirely the result of the acquisition with the central region of the state having a strong farming base.  All commercial loan segments includelesser degree, to municipalities within a diverse range of industries. The credit risk related to commercial and industrial loans agricultural productionis largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations, or on the value of underlying collateral, if any. Commercial and industrial loans increased $16 million since year end 2013. Commercial and industrial loans continue to be the largest segment of Nicolet’s portfolio and increased to 31.3% of the total portfolio at June 30, 2014, up from 29.9% at December 31, 2013.
Owner-occupied CRE loans declined to 21.8% of loans at June 30, 2014 from 22.1% at December 31, 2013 and primarily consist of loans within a diverse range of industries secured by business real estate that is occupied by borrowers (i.e. who operate their businesses out of the underlying collateral) and who may also have commercial and industrial loans. Thecredit risk related to owner-occupied CRE loans is largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations, or on the value of underlying collateral, if any.collateral.
 
Total CREAgricultural production and agricultural real estate loans were 23.1%combined consist of loans secured by farmland and related farming operations. The credit risk related to agricultural loans is largely influenced by the prices farmers can get for their production and/or the underlying value of the farmland. In total, the agricultural loans increased $5 million since year end 2013, representing 6.5% of total loans at June 30, 2013.  CRE investment loans comprised 14.0% of the portfolio at June 30, 2013 compared to 13.9%2014, versus 6.1% at December 31, 2012.  2013.
The CRE investment loan classification primarily includes commercial-based mortgage loans that are secured by non-owner occupied, nonfarm/nonresidential real estate properties, and multi-family residential properties. The increaseLending in agriculturalthis segment has been focused on loans that are secured by commercial income-producing properties as opposed to speculative real estate development. The balance of these loans (at 4.6%declined $11 million since year end 2013, declining as a percent of loans from 10.7% to 9.3% at June 30, 2014.
Loans in the construction and land development portfolio represent 5.3% of total loans versus 2.1% at June 30, 20132014 and year end 2012, respectively) was almost entirely the result of the acquisition with the central region of Wisconsin having a strong farming base.  Construction and land developmentsuch loans were 4.5% at June 30, 2013 compared to 3.9% December 31, 2012.  Loans in this classification provide financing for the development of commercial income properties, multi-family residential development, and land designated for future development. CreditNicolet controls the credit risk on these types of loans is controlled by making loans in familiar markets, reviewing the merits of individual projects, controlling loan structure, and monitoring the progress of projects through the analysis of construction advances. This category has been decreasing as Nicolet has limited new lending to reduce its credit exposure and the acquisition did not significantly impact this category.  Lending in this segment has been focused on loans that are secured by commercial income-producing properties as opposed to speculative real estate development. Credit risk on both CRE investment loans and construction and land development loans is managed by employing sound underwriting guidelines, lending primarily to borrowers in local markets, periodically evaluating the underlying collateral, and formally reviewing the borrower’s financial soundness and relationships on an ongoing basis. Lending on originated loans in this area declined steadily both in total dollars and as a percentage of the portfolio over the past several years, with the 2013 increase attributable to the 2013 acquisitions. Since December 31, 2013, balances have increased $3 million but remained relatively consistent as a percent of loans given the overall increase in total loan balances since year end.
 
Residential constructionOn a combined basis, Nicolet’s residential real estate loans were 1.2%represent 25.2% of total loans at June 30, 2013 compared to 1.4% at2014, down 0.3% from December 31, 2012 representing a continued downward trend in these types of loans.
Residential first mortgage real estate loans increased slightly from 15.5% at December 31, 2012 to 16.8% largely as a result of acquired balances.2013. Residential first mortgage loans include conventional first-lien home mortgages and exclude loans held for sale in the secondary market. Since early 2012, Nicolet has retained specific high quality residential mortgages, in part as an alternative to investing in greater volumes of mortgage-backed securities.mortgages. Residential junior mortgage real estate loans increased slightly in balance but declined as a percent of loans from 7.1% at December 31, 2012 to 5.8% of loans at June 30, 2013.  Residential junior mortgage real estate loans consist mainly of home equity lines and term loans secured by junior mortgage liens. WhileAcross the industry, home equities generally involve loans that are in second or junior lien positions, but Nicolet has secured many such loans in a first lien position, further mitigating the portfolio risks. Nicolet has not experienced significant losses in theits residential real estate category,loans; however, if declines in market values that have occurred in the residential real estate markets worsen,decline, particularly in Nicolet’s market area, the value of collateral securing its real estate loans could decline further, whichfalling loan-to-value ratios could cause an increase in the provision for loan losses. In light of the uncertainty that exists in the economy and credit markets, there can be no guarantee that Nicolet will not experience additional deterioration resulting from a downturn in credit performance by its residential real estate loan customers. As part of its management of originating residential mortgage loans, the vast majority of Nicolet’s long-term, fixed-rate residential real estate mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market without retaining the servicing rights. At JuneMortgage loans retained in the portfolio are typically of high quality and have historically had low net charge off rates. While mortgage loans normally hold terms of 30 2013, $3.1 millionyears, Nicolet’s portfolio mortgages have an average contractual life of residential mortgages were held for resale to the secondary market, compared to $7.3 million at December 31, 2012.less than 15 years.
 
RetailLoans in the retail and other loans totaled $6.0 million at June 30, 2013, an increaseclassification represent less than 1% of $0.5 million since December 31, 2012,the total loan portfolio, and represented 0.7% and 1.0% of total loans, respectively. Loans in this classification include predominantly short-term and other personal installment loans not secured by real estate. The decline in retail and other loans is largely a result of consumers preferring home equity-based loans over consumer installment loans, as well as the uncertain and difficult economic conditions reducing consumer demand for leverage in general. Credit risk is primarily controlled by reviewing the creditworthiness of the borrowers, monitoring payment histories, and taking appropriate collateral andand/or guaranty positions. The loan balances in this portfolio remained relatively unchanged from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014.
 
Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality are sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans and commitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, early problem loan identification and remedial action to minimize losses, an adequate ALLL, and sound nonaccrual and charge-off policies. An active credit risk management process is used for commercial loans to further ensure that sound and consistent credit decisions are made. The credit management process is regularly reviewed and the process has been modified over the past several years to further strengthen the controls.
 
The loan portfolio is widely diversified by types of borrowers, industry groups, and market areas. Significant loan concentrations are considered to exist for a financial institution when there are amounts loaned to multiple numbers of borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At June 30, 2013,2014, no significant industry concentrations existed in Nicolet’s portfolio in excess of 25% of total loans. Nicolet has also developed guidelines to manage its exposure to various types of concentration risks.
 
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
 
In addition to the discussion that follows, see also Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” and Note 6, “Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality,” in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit risks within the loan portfolio are inherently different for each loan type.type as described under “Balance Sheet Analysis-Loans.” Credit risk is controlled and monitored through the use of lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers, and on-going review of loan payment performance. Active asset quality administration, including early problem loan identification and timely resolution of problems, aids in the management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses.
 
The ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense to appropriately provide for potential credit losses in the existing loan portfolio. Loans are charged off against the ALLL when management believes that the collection of principal is unlikely. The level of the ALLL represents management’s estimate of an amount of reserves that provides for estimated probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. To assess the ALLL, an allocation methodology is applied by Nicolet which focuses on evaluation of qualitative and environmental factors, including but not limited to: (i) evaluation of facts and issues related to specific loans; (ii) management’s ongoing review and grading of the loan portfolio; (iii) consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience on each portfolio segment; (iv) trends in past due and nonperforming loans; (v) the risk characteristics of the various loan segments; (vi) changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio; (vii) concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries; (viii) existing and forecasted economic conditions; (ix) the fair value of underlying collateral; and (x) other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. Nicolet’s methodology reflects guidance by regulatory agencies to all financial institutions.
 
At June 30, 2013, the ALLL was $7.7 million, an increase of $0.6 million since December 31, 2012 and $0.2 million since March 31, 2013.  The ALLL as a percentage of total loans was 0.91% at June 30, 2013.  This is a decline from 1.39% at March 31, 2013 and 1.29% at December 31, 2012.  This was largely the result of the acquisition, as loans are recorded directly at their estimated fair value (inclusive of credit-related marks) and no addition to the allowance for loan losses is recorded at consummation.  Loss history on the acquired loans will be developed as charge offs occur and an allocation will be made for these loans in future periods as or if needed.  The provision for loan losses for the first six months of 2013 was $2.0 million compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2012.  Gross charge-offs were $1.4 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to $2.3 million for the first six months of 2012.  Recoveries were $31,000 and $55,000 for the two periods, respectively. As a result, net charge-offs for the first six months of 2013 were $1.4 million compared to $2.2 million for the comparable period in 2012.  Commercial and industrial and CRE investment loan charge offs increased compared to 2012 while all other categories saw improvement.  Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses.  The level of the provision for loan losses is directly correlated to the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance, including, but not limited to, consideration of the amount of net charge-offs, loan growth, levels of nonperforming loans, and trends in the risk profile of the loan portfolio.
The ALLL was 43.53% and 98.63% of nonperforming assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Issues impacting asset quality over the past few years have included historically depressed economic factors, such as weakened commercial and residential real estate markets, volatile energy prices, heightened unemployment, and depressed consumer confidence, leading to long resolution periods at low returns. Declining collateral values significantly contributed to elevated levels of nonperforming loans, net charge-offs, and ALLL. Nicolet pursued rigorous workout and resolution plans on problem credits and implemented enhanced underwriting and credit monitoring, particularly in 2010 and 2011. As a result, asset quality stabilized during 2012 and continues to improve in 2013.
Nicolet’s managementManagement allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio segment. The allocation methodology consists of the following components. First, a specific reserve for the estimated collateral shortfall is established for all loans determined to be impaired. The specific reserve in the ALLL is equal to the aggregate collateral or discounted cash flow shortfall calculated from the impairment analysis.analyses. Loans measured for impairment include nonaccrual loans, non-performing troubled debt-restructurings (“restructured loans”), or other loans determined to be impaired by management. Second, Nicolet’s management allocates ALLL with historical loss rates by loan segment. The loss factors applied in the methodology are periodically re-evaluated and adjusted to reflect changes in historical loss levels on an annual basis. Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, management extended the look-back period on which the average historical loss rates are determined, from a prior three-year period to a rolling 20-quarter (5 year) average, as a means of capturing more of a full credit cycle now that recent period loss levels are stabilizing. Contrarily, the three-year average (used by the Company’s methodology during 2009-2013) was considered more appropriate for the severe and prolonged economic downturn particularly evidenced by higher net charge off levels in 2008 through 2011. Lastly, management allocates ALLL to the remaining loan portfolio using the qualitative factors mentioned above. Consideration is given to those current qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses as of the evaluation date to differ from the historical loss experience of each loan segment.
At June 30, 2013, the largest portion of the ALLL is allocated to construction and land development loans at $3.3 million, representing 43.5% of the ALLL (compared to 36.2% allocated to this segment at December 31, 2012), and commensurate with risks in this segment, past loss history and nonaccrual activity. Owner-occupied CRE, CRE investment, and residential first mortgage loans all show significant increase in nonperforming levels, however, the majority of the increase was due to acquired loans which have been marked to fair value and did not require additional allowance at June 30, 2013.  At June 30, 2013, $10.6 million of the $14.3 million total nonaccrual loans were acquired loans, thus the remaining $3.7 million are originated nonaccrual loans, down $3.3 million from the $7.0 million nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2012.
 
Management performs ongoing intensive analyses of its loan portfolio to allow for early identification of customers experiencing financial difficulties, maintains prudent underwriting standards, understands the economy in its markets, and considers the trend of deterioration in loan quality in establishing the level of the ALLL.
 
Consolidated net income and stockholders’ equity could be affected if Nicolet’s management’s estimate of the ALLL necessary to cover expected losses is subsequently materially different, requiring a change in the level of provision for loan losses to be recorded. While management uses currently available information to recognize losses on loans, future adjustments to the ALLL may be necessary based on newly received appraisals, updated commercial customer financial statements, rapidly deteriorating customer cash flow, and changes in economic conditions that affect Nicolet’s customers. As an integral part of their examination process, federal regulatory agencies also review the ALLL. Such agencies may require additions to the ALLL or may require that certain loan balances be charged-off or downgraded into criticized loan categories when their credit evaluations differ from those of management based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
 
At June 30, 2014, the ALLL was $9.6 million compared to $9.2 million at December 31, 2013. The six-month increase was a result of a 2014 provision of $1.4 million offset by 2014 net charge offs of $0.9 million. Comparatively, the provision for loan losses in the first six months of 2013 was $2.0 million and net charge offs were $1.4 million. Annualized net charge offs as a percent of average loans were 0.22% in the first half of 2014 compared to 0.49% for the first half of 2013 and 0.54% for the entire year of 2013. Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses. The level of the provision for loan losses is directly correlated to the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance, including, but not limited to, consideration of the amount of net charge-offs, loan growth, levels of nonperforming loans, and trends in the risk profile of the loan portfolio.
The ratio of the ALLL as a percentage of period-end loans was 1.12% at June 30, 2014 compared to 1.09% at December 31, 2013 and 0.91% at June 30, 2013. The ALLL to loans ratio was impacted most after each of the 2013 acquisitions, which combined at their acquisition dates added no ALLL to the numerator and $284 million to the denominator. As events occur in the acquired loan portfolios, an ALLL will be established for this pool of assets as appropriate. At June 30, 2014 $9.6 million of the ALLL was reserved against loans (representing 1.49% of originated loans).
The largest portions of the ALLL were allocated to construction and land development loans and commercial & industrial loans combined, representing 62.9% and 73.3% of the ALLL at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The decrease allocation to these categories since December 31, 2013 was the result of changes to allowance allocations as additional qualitative factors are refined, creating a more ratable distribution of the provision across categories.

Table 9: Loan Loss Experience
    
 For the three months ended,  For the six months ended  Year ended 
(in thousands) June 30,
2013
  March 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
  September 30,
2012
  June 30,
2012
  
June 30,
2014
��
June 30,
2013
  December 31, 2013 
Allowance for loan losses (ALLL):                        
Balance at beginning of period $7,540  $7,120  $6,491  $6,045  $5,973  $9,232  $7,120  $7,120 
                    
Provision for loan losses  975   975   975   975   1,125   1,350   1,950   6,200 
Charge offs  876   567   671   552   1,077 
Charge-offs  979   1,443   4,238 
Recoveries  19   12   325   23   24   39   31   150 
Net charge offs  857   555   346   529   1,053 
Net charge-offs  940   1,412   4,088 
Balance at end of period $7,658  $7,540  $7,120  $6,491  $6,045  $9,642  $7,658  $9,232 
                                
Net loan charge offs:                    
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries):            
Commercial & industrial $(16) $470  $164  $48  $66  $524  $454  $534 
Owner-occupied CRE  254   111   1,851 
Agricultural production                 -   -   - 
Owner-occupied CRE  56   55   (291)  300   666 
Agricultural real estate        1         -   -   - 
CRE investment  639      (27)  150      (8)  639   992 
Construction & land development  36      406   (17)  176   12   36   304 
Residential construction           1   30   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage  44   36   45   48   64   122   80   148 
Residential junior mortgage  88   (6)  47   (1)  13   9   82   189 
Retail & other  10      1      38   27   10   70 
Total net loans charged off $857  $555  $346  $529  $1,053 
Total net loans charged-off $940  $1,412  $4,088 
                                
ALLL to total loans  0.91%  1.39%  1.29%  1.19%  1.17%  1.12%  0.91%  1.09%
ALLL to net charge offs  223.40%  339.64%  514.45%  306.76%  143.52%
Net charge offs to average loans, annualized  0.49%  0.41%  0.25%  0.40%  0.83%
ALLL to net charge-offs  1,026%  542%  226%
Net charge-offs to average loans, annualized  0.22%  0.49%  0.54%
 
The allocation of the ALLL for each of the past five periods is based on Nicolet’s estimate of loss exposure by category of loans and is shown in Table 10.10 for June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 10: Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
            
(in thousands) June 30,
2013
  
% of Loan
Type to
Total
Loans
  December 31, 2012  
% of Loan
Type to
Total
Loans
  June 30,
2014
  
% of Loan
Type to
Total
Loans
  December 31, 2013  
% of Loan
Type to
Total
Loans
 
ALLL allocation                        
Commercial & industrial $1,685   29.3% $1,969   35.7% $3,281   31.3% $1,798   29.9%
Owner-occupied CRE  1,096   21.8   766   22.1 
Agricultural production  5   1.6   -   0.1   44   1.6   18   1.7 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,217   21.5   1,069   19.3 
Agricultural real estate  12   4.6   -   2.1   272   4.9   59   4.4 
CRE investment   183   14.0   337   13.9   575   9.3   505   10.7 
Construction & land development  3,346   4.5   2,580   3.9   2,784   5.3   4,970   5.1 
Residential construction  173   1.2   137   1.4   167   1.4   229   1.5 
Residential first mortgage  733   16.8   685   15.5   833   18.0   544   18.2 
Residential junior mortgage  287   5.8   312   7.1   448   5.8   321   5.8 
Retail & other   17   0.7   31   1.0   142   0.6   22   0.6 
Total ALLL  $7,658   100.0% $7,120   100.0% $9,642   100% $9,232   100%
                
ALLL category as a percent of total ALLL:                                
Commercial & industrial  22.0%      27.7%      34.0%      19.5%    
Owner-occupied CRE  11.4       8.3     
Agricultural production  0.1       -       0.5       0.2     
Owner-occupied CRE  15.9       15.0     
Agricultural real estate  0.2       -       2.8       0.6     
CRE investment   2.4       4.7       6.0       5.5     
Construction & land development  43.5       36.2       28.9       53.8     
Residential construction  2.3       1.9       1.7       2.5     
Residential first mortgage  9.6       9.6       8.6       5.9     
Residential junior mortgage  3.8       4.4       4.6       3.5     
Retail & other   0.2       0.5       1.5       0.2     
Total ALLL   100.0%      100.0%      100%      100%    
 
Impaired Loans and Nonperforming Assets
 
As part of its overall credit risk management process, Nicolet’s management has been committed to an aggressive problem loan identification philosophy. This philosophy has been implemented through the ongoing monitoring and review of all pools of risk in the loan portfolio to ensure that problem loans are identified early and the risk of loss is minimized.
 
Nonperforming loans are considered one indicator of potential future loan losses. Nonperforming loans are defined as nonaccrual loans, including those defined as impaired under current accounting standards, and loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing interest. Loans measured for impairment include significant nonaccrual loans, troubled debt-restructurings (“restructured loans”), or other loans determined to be impaired by management. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed, amortization of related loan fees is suspended, and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are subsequently received in cash after a determination has been made that the principal balance of the loan is collectible. If collectability of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.
NonperformingNonaccrual loans were $14.3$7.2 million (consisting of $1.9 million originated loans and $7.0$5.3 million acquired loans) at June 30, 2014 compared to $10.3 million at December 31, 2013. Nonperforming assets (which include nonperforming loans and OREO) were $8.7 million at June 30, 2013 and2014 compared to $12.3 million at December 31, 2012, respectively.  This balance2013. OREO decreased from $2.0 million at year end 2013 to $1.5 million at June 30, 2014. OREO at June 30, 2014 included $10.6a branch which was moved from active to inactive status and written to a fair value of $0.2 million of nonperforming loans acquiredresulting in the merger representing a net decline of $3.3$0.6 million in nonperforming originated loans.   This continues the improving trendcharge to second quarter earnings. Nonperforming assets as a resultpercent of Nicolet’s aggressive workout efforts over the past three years.total assets were 0.74% at June 30, 2014 compared to 1.02% at December 31, 2013.
 
The level of potential problem loans is another predominant factor in determining the relative level of risk in the loan portfolio and in determining the adequacy of the ALLL. Potential problem loans are generally defined by management to include loans rated as Substandard by management but that are in performing status; however, there are circumstances present which might adversely affect the ability of the borrower to comply with present repayment terms. The decision of management to include performing loans in potential problem loans does not necessarily mean that Nicolet expects losses to occur, but that management recognizes a higher degree of risk associated with these loans. The loans that have been reported as potential problem loans are predominantly commercialcommercial-based loans covering a diverse range of businesses and real estate property types.
Potential problem loans totaled $16.2were $16.8 million (or 1.9%(2.0% of totalloans) and $18.7 million (2.2% of loans) at June 30, 20132014 and $11.6 million (or 2.1% of total loans) at December 31, 2012.2013, respectively. Potential problem loans require a heightened management review of the pace at which a credit may deteriorate, the duration of asset quality stress, and uncertainty around the magnitude and scope of economic stress that may be felt by Nicolet’s customers and on underlying real estate values.
OREO increased to $3.4 million at June 30, 2013 from $0.2 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was related to one originated loan which had been on nonaccrual and was taken into possession in the first quarter of 2013 with the remaining balance of $1.7 million being acquired in the merger.  Total nonperforming assets increased from $7.2 million at December 31, 2012 to $17.7 million at June 30, 2013.   The increase in nonperforming assets included acquired loans with a balance of $10.6 million at June 30, 2013.    Nicolet’s management actively seeks to ensure properties held are monitored to minimize Nicolet’s risk of loss. Evaluations of the fair market value of the OREO properties are done quarterly and valuation adjustments, if necessary, are recorded in Nicolet’s consolidated financial statements.

Table 11: Nonperforming Assets
                  
(in thousands) June 30,
2013
  March 31,
2013
  December 31,
2012
  September 30,
2012
  June 30,
2012
  June 30,
2014
  December 31, 2013  
June 30,
 2013
 
Nonaccrual loans considered impaired:               
Nonaccrual loans:         
Commercial & industrial
 $4  $93  $784  $3,986  $4,088  $517  $68  $4 
Owner-occupied CRE  1,975   1,087   3,546 
Agricultural production
  22               27   11   22 
Owner-occupied CRE
  3,546   1,857   1,960   354   389 
Agricultural real estate
  611               461   448   611 
CRE investment
  5,546         380   544   1,607   4,631   5,546 
Construction & land development
  790      2,560   8,558   8,531   479   1,265   790 
Residential construction
           397   1,200          
Residential first mortgage
  3,394   628   1,580   1,326   396   1,671   2,365   3,394 
Residential junior mortgage
  257            36   461   262   257 
Retail & other
  135   149   142   151   151      129   135 
Total nonaccrual loans considered impaired
  14,307   2,727   7,026   15,152   15,335 
Impaired loans still accruing interest
               
Total nonaccrual loans
  7,198   10,266   14,307 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
                        
Total nonperforming loans
 $14,307  $2,727  $7,026  $15,152  $15,335  $7,198  $10,266  $14,307 
CRE investment
 $360  $121  $71  $393  $393  $558  $935  $360 
Owner-occupied CRE
  604               259      604 
Construction & land development
  1,925   1,917   17   19   44   418   854   1,925 
Residential real estate owned
  471      105   205   453   67   198   471 
Bank property real estate owned
  200       
OREO
  3,360   2,038   193   617   890   1,502   1,987   3,360 
Total nonperforming assets
 $17,667  $4,765  $7,219  $15,769  $16,225  $8,700  $12,253  $17,667 
Total restructured loans accruing
                $3,879  $3,862  $ 
Ratios                                
Nonperforming loans to total loans
  1.7%  0.5%  1.3%  2.8%  3.0%  0.84%  1.21%  1.70%
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus OREO
  2.09%  0.88%  1.31%  2.89%  3.13%  1.01%  1.44%  2.09%
Nonperforming assets to total assets
  1.62%  0.70%  0.97%  2.46%  2.42%  0.74%  1.02%  1.62%
ALLL to nonperforming assets
  43.35%  158.24%  98.63%  41.16%  37.27%
ALLL to total loans at end of year
  0.91%  1.39%  1.29%  1.19%  1.17%
ALLL to nonperforming loans
  134.0%  89.9%  43.4%
ALLL to total loans
  1.12%  1.09%  0.91%
 
Table 12: Investment Securities Portfolio
                  
 June 30, 2013  December 31, 2012       
                   June 30, 2014  December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
  
% of
Total
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
  
% of
Total
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
  
% of
Total
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
  
% of
Total
 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $1,000  $1,001   1% $-  $-   -%
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises $1,532  $1,537   1% $2,062  $2,057   2%
State, county and municipals  51,742   52,340   40%  31,642  $32,687   58%  76,446   77,067   54%  54,594   55,039   43%
Mortgage-backed securities  73,581   73,263   57%  19,876   20,668   37%  62,946   62,928   44%  68,642   67,879   53%
Corporate debt securities  220   220   -%  -   -   -%  220   220   -   220   220   - 
Equity securities  1,576   3,164   2%  1,624   2,546   5%  715   1,903   1%  905   2,320   2%
Total $128,119  $129,988   100% $53,142  $55,901   100% $141,859  $143,655   100% $126,423  $127,515   100%
 
At June 30, 20132014 the total carrying value of investment securities was $130.0$144 million, up from $55.9$128 million at December 31, 2012,2013, and represented 11.9%12.2% and 7.5%10.6% of total assets at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, respectively. As part of the merger, securities with a fair value of $119 million were acquired and as of June 30, 2013 approximately $44 million had been sold in conjunction with planned reductions.
At June 30, 2013,2014, the securities portfolio did not contain securities of any single issuer that were payable from and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority where the aggregate carrying value of such securities exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity.

In addition to securities available for sale, Nicolet had other investments of $7.5 million and $5.2$8.0 million at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012, respectively,2013, consisting of capital stock in the Federal Reserve and the FHLB (required as members of the Federal Reserve Bank System and the Federal Home Loan Bank System), and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, as well as equity investments in other privateprivately-traded companies. The FHLB and Federal Reserve investments are “restricted” in that they can only be sold back to the respective institutions or another member institution at par, and are thus, not liquid, have no ready market or quoted market value, and are carried at cost. The remaining investments in private companies have no quoted market prices, and are carried at cost less other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges, if any. Nicolet’s management evaluates all these other investments periodically for impairment, considering financial condition and other available relevant information. There were no OTTI charges recorded in 20122013 or year to date 2013.
2014.

Table 13: Investment Securities Portfolio Maturity Distribution
  As of June 30, 2014 
  
Within
One Year
  
After One
but Within
Five Years
  
After Five
but Within
Ten Years
  
After
Ten Years
  
Mortgage-
related
and Equity
Securities
  
Total
Amortized
Cost
  
Total
Fair
Value
Amount
 
  Amount Yield  Amount Yield  Amount Yield  Amount Yield  Amount Yield  Amount Yield 
(in thousands)                                 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $1,011  4.1% $  % $521  1.8% $  % $  % $1,532  3.3% $1,537 
State and county municipals (1)  4,209  3.2   62,344  2.5   9,028  3.0   865  3.0        76,446  2.6   77,067 
Corporate debt securities                 220  2.0        220  2.0   220 
Mortgage-backed securities                      62,946  3.4   62,946  3.4   62,928 
Equity securities                      715     715     1,903 
                                               
Total amortized cost $5,220  3.4% $62,344  2.5% $9,549  2.9% $1,085  2.8% $63,661  3.4% $141,859  3.0% $143,655 
Total fair value and carrying value $5,276     $62,986     $9,471     $1,091     $64,831            $143,655 
  As of June 30, 2013 
  
Within
One Year
  
After One
but Within
Five Years
  
After Five
but Within
Ten Years
  
After
Ten Years
  
Mortgage-
related
and Equity
Securities
  
Total
Amortized
Cost
  
Total
Fair
Value
Amount
 
  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
(in thousands)                                       
U.S. government sponsored enterprises $   % $1,000   0.3% $   % $   % $   % $1,000   0.3% $1,001 
State and county municipals (1)  5,263   3.3   37,268   2.3   8,835   1.7   375   4.1         51,741   4.0   52,340 
Corporate debt securities                    220   9.9         220   9.9   220 
Mortgage-backed securities                          73,581   1.7   73,581   1.7   73,263 
Equity securities                          1,576      1,576      3,164 
Total amortized cost $5,263   3.3% $38,268   2.2% $8,835   1.7% $595   6.2% $75,157   1.7% $128,118   2.6% $129,988 
Total fair value and carrying value $5,320      $39,124      $8,522      $595      $76,427              $129,988 


(1)
The yield on tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
Deposits
 
Deposits represent Nicolet’s largest source of funds. Nicolet competes with other bank and nonbank institutions for deposits, as well as with a growing number of non-deposit investment alternatives available to depositors, such as mutual funds, money market funds, annuities, and other brokerage investment products. Challenges to deposit growth include price changes on deposit products given movements in the rate environment and other competitive pricing pressures, and customer preferences regarding higher-costing deposit products or non-deposit investment alternatives. Included in total deposits in Table 14 are brokered deposits of $61.9$29 million at June 30, 20132014 and $32.6$50 million at December 31, 2012.2013.
 
Table 14: Deposits
 
 June 30, 2013  December 31, 2012  June 30, 2014  December 31, 2013 
(in thousands) Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
  Amount  
% of
Total
 
Demand
 $150,460   16.6% $108,234   17.6% $190,464   18.8% $171,321   16.6%
Money market and NOW accounts
  387,377   42.7%  322,507   52.3%  451,791   44.7%  492,499   47.6%
Savings
  90,202   9.9%  46,907   7.6%  112,232   11.1%  97,601   9.4%
Time
  280,044   30.8%  138,445   22.5%  256,634   25.4%  273,413   26.4%
Total deposits
 $908,083   100.0% $616,093   100.0% $1,011,121   100% $1,034,834   100%
 
Total deposits were $908 million$1.01 billion at June 30, 2013, an increase of $292 million2014, with no significant change since December 31, 2012, with $346 million of deposits from Mid-Wisconsin at acquisition.  The decline of $54 million in deposits mirrors seasonality within the customer base with deposits typically seen.2013. On average for the quarter,first six months of 2014, total deposits were $699 million, an increase of $176 million over 2012 averages, which includes two months of average deposit balances from merged activity.   The mix of average deposits continues to be impacted by a continued shift in customer preferences, predominantly away from time deposits.$1.03 billion.
 
Table 15: Average Deposits
 
 For the six months ended, For the six months ended, 
 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2013 
(in thousands) Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 Amount 
% of
Total
 
Demand
 $110,189   15.8% $74,719   14.3% $165,177   16.1% $110,189   15.8%
Money market and NOW accounts
  340,787   48.8%  253,982   48.6%  485,895   47.5%  340,787   48.8%
Savings
  64,602   9.2%  27,694   5.3%  103,854   10.1%  64,602   9.2%
Time
  183,238   26.2%  166,407   31.8%  269,373   26.3%  183,238   26.2%
Total
 $698,816   100.0% $522,802   100.0% $1,024,299   100% $698,816   100%
 
Table 16: Maturity Distribution of Certificates of Deposit
   
(in thousands) June 30, 2013  June 30, 2014 
3 months or less
 $84,217  $39,140 
Over 3 months through 6 months
 32,448  37,496 
Over 6 months through 12 months
 74,532  52,765 
Over 12 months
  88,847   127,233 
      
Total
 $280,044  $256,634 
 
Other Funding Sources
 
Other funding sources, which include short-term and long-term borrowings (notes payable and junior subordinated debentures), were $70.3$43 million and $45.4$52 million at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, respectively. Short-term borrowings, consisting mainly of customer repurchase agreements and FHLB advances maturing in less than three months, totaled $33.2$3 million at June 30, 20132014 and $4.0$7 million at December 31, 2012.2013. Long-term borrowings include a joint venture note and FHLB advances, totaling $25.0$27 million and $32 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $35.2 million at2014 and December 31, 2012, attributable to scheduled principal payments on the joint venture note payable and repayment of $10 million of longer term FHLB advances during first quarter 2013, (with a prepayment penalty of $96,000 recorded in other expense).  At acquisition, $48 million of short and long term debt (excluding subordinated debentures) was assumed and then paid off by June 30, 2013.  FHLB advances acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction were marked at fair value assuming immediate payoff; however, they were repaid later in the second quarter, with the most notable result being a $0.2 million ‘recovery’ of prepayment penalty recorded in other expense.respectively. Junior subordinated debentures are another long-term funding source.source totaling $12 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Junior subordinated debentures of $6.2 million were issued in July 2004 in connection with the $6 million of trust preferred securities. Acquired junior subordinated debentures of $10.3 million in connection with $10 million of trust preferred securities were assumed in the Mid-Wisconsin merger and subsequentlyinitially recorded at the fair market value of $5.8 million.million, with the discount being accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the debentures. Further information regarding these junior subordinated debentures is located in Note 9 of“Note 8 – Junior Subordinated Debentures” in the unaudited consolidated financial statements.Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Obligations
 
As of June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, Nicolet had the following commitments that did not appear on its balance sheet:
 
Table 17: Commitments

  June 30,  December 31, 
  2013  2012 
(in thousands)      
Commitments to extend credit — Fixed and variable rate
 $232,629  $178,676 
Standby and irrevocable letters of credit-fixed rate
  7,582   4,050 
Contractual Obligations
Nicolet is party to various contractual obligations requiring the use of funds as part of its normal operations. Most of these obligations are routinely refinanced into similar replacement obligations. However, renewal of these obligations is dependent on its ability to offer competitive interest rates, liquidity needs, or availability of collateral for pledging purposes supporting the long-term advances.
At the completion of the construction of Nicolet’s headquarters building in 2005 and as part of a joint venture investment related to the building, Nicolet and the other joint venture partners guaranteed a joint venture note to finance certain costs of the building. This note is secured by the building, bears a fixed rate of 5.81% and requires monthly principal and interest payments until its maturity on June 1, 2016. The balance of this joint venture note was $10.0 million and $10.2 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
  June 30,  December 31, 
  2014  2013 
(in thousands)      
Commitments to extend credit — Fixed and variable rate
 $226,255  $234,930 
Standby and irrevocable letters of credit-fixed rate
  5,906   6,371 
 
Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity
 
Liquidity management refers to the ability to ensure that cash is available in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and to meet other commitments as they fall due, including the ability to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries, repurchase common stock, and satisfy other operating requirements.
 
Funds are available from a number of basic banking activity sources including but not limited to the core deposit base, the repayment and maturity of loans, investment securities calls, maturities, and sales, and sales offunds obtained through brokered deposits. All investment securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. Approximately $60$55 million of the $130$144 million investment securities portfolio on hand at June 30, 20132014 was pledged to secure public deposits, short-term borrowings, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law. Other funding sources available include short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, and long-term borrowings.
 
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 were approximately $36$86 million and $82$147 million, respectively. The increased cash and cash equivalents at year end compared to historical levels were2013 was predominantly due to strong customer deposit growth outpacing the loan demand. These levels returned to more historical levels duringhave declined through the first quarter.half of 2014 as is typical of Nicolet’s historical deposit behaviors. Nicolet’s liquidity resources were sufficient as of June 30, 20132014 to fund loans and to meet other cash needs as necessary.
 
Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis

Table 18 represents a schedule of Nicolet’s assets and liabilities repricing over various time intervals. The primary market risk faced by Nicolet is interest rate risk. The static gap analysis starts with contractual repricing information for assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments. These items are then combined with repricing estimations for administered rate (interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, and money market accounts) and non-rate related products (demand deposit accounts, other assets, and other liabilities) to create a baseline repricing balance sheet. In addition to the contractual information, residential mortgage whole loan products and mortgage-backed securities are adjusted based on industry estimates of prepayment speeds that capture the expected prepayment of principal above the contractual amount based on how far away the contractual coupon is from market coupon rates. The interest rate sensitivity assumptions for savings accounts, money market accounts, and interest-bearing demand deposits accounts are based on current and historical experiences regarding portfolio retention and interest rate repricing behavior. Based on these experiences, a portion of these balances are considered to be long-term and fairly stable and are, therefore, included in categories beyond the immediate contractual repricing category.

At December 31, 2013, the indicated time intervalsone year cumulative gap was $85 million with a cumulative ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities of 114% representing a slightly asset sensitive position. At December 31, 2013 the cumulative maturityone year gap to total assets ratio was 7% which was within Nicolet’s established guidelines of not greater than +25% or -25%. of total assets. During the first six months of 2014, interest bearing cash equivalents declined in conjunction with Nicolet’s cyclical decline in deposits. The one year cumulative gap at June 30, 2014 increased slightly to $120 million and represented a cumulative ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities of 123%, versus 114% at year end 2013. At June 30, 2014 the cumulative one year gap to total assets ratio was 10% which was within Nicolet’s established guidelines of not greater than +25% or -25% of total assets.
 
Table 18: Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis
  June 30, 2013 
(in thousands) 0-90 Days  91-180
Days
  181-365
Days
  1-5 years  
Beyond
5 Years
  Total 
Earning Assets:                  
Loans
 $365,528  $76,137  $43,979  $285,395  $61,849  $832,888 
Securities at fair value
  4,387   10,694   3,619   60,628   50,660   129,988 
Other earnings assets
  31,777            7,531   39,308 
Total
 $401,692  $86,831  $47,598  $346,023  $120,040  $1,002,184 
                         
Cumulative rate sensitive assets
 $401,692  $488,523  $536,121  $882,144  $1,002,184     
                         
Interest-bearing liabilities                        
Interest bearing deposits (1)
 $411,901  $77,936  $29,046  $88,017  $150,723  $757,623 
Borrowings
  33,398   1,908   3,735   14,210   5,020   58,271 
Subordinated debentures
  1,504   1,504   3,007   6,014      12,029 
Total
 $446,803  $81,348  $35,788  $108,241  $155,743  $827,923 
                         
Cumulative interest sensitive liabilities $446,803  $528,151  $563,939  $672,180  $827,923     
                         
Interest sensitivity gap
 $(45,111) $5,483  $11,810  $237,782  $(35,703)    
                         
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap
 $(45,111) $(39,628) $(27,818) $209,964  $174,261     
Cumulative ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities  90%  92%  95%  131%  121%    

(1)
The interest rate sensitivity assumptions for savings accounts, money market accounts, and interest-bearing demand deposits accounts are based on current and historical experiences regarding portfolio retention and interest rate repricing behavior. Based on these experiences, a portion of these balances are considered to be long-term and fairly stable and are, therefore, included in the “1-5 Years” and “Beyond 5 Years” categories.
In order to limit exposure to interest rate risk, management monitors the liquidity and gap analysis on a monthly basis and adjustsmay adjust pricing, term and product offerings when necessary to stay within applicable guidelines and maximize the effectiveness of asset/liability management.
 
Along with the static gap analysis, Nicolet’s management also estimates the effect a gradual change and a sudden change in interest rates could have on expected net interest income through income simulation. The simulation is run using the prime rate as the base with the assumption of rates increasing 100, 200, and 300 bps or decreasing 100, 200 and 300 bps. All rates are increased or decreased parallel to the change in prime rate. The simulation assumes a static mix of assets and liabilities. As a result of the simulation, over a 12-month time period ending June 30, 2013,2015, net interest income was estimated to decrease 6.19%2.6% if rates increase 100 bps in an immediate shock scenario, and was estimated to decrease 0.33%2.6% in a 100 bps declining rate environment assumption. These results are in line with Nicolet’s increasing interest rate sensitivity position, including relatively short (though extending) loan maturities and level of variable rate loans with interest floors; as rates remain low, and asset maturities extend, whileand deposit maturities contract, thispressuring the position continues to become more liability-sensitive. These results are based solely on the modeled changes in the market rates and do not reflect the earnings sensitivity that may arise from other factors such as changes in the shape of the yield curve, changes in spreads between key market rates, or changes in consumer or business behavior. Interest rates did increase significantly in June with longer term rates rising over 100 bps and there was not a corresponding rise in deposit rates.  These results also do not include any management action to mitigate potential income variances within the modeled process. The simulation results are one indicator of interest rate risk, and actual net interest income is largely impacted by the allocation of assets, liabilities and product mix. Nicolet’s managementManagement continually reviews its interest rate risk position through the Asset/Liability Committee process, and such Committee reports to the full board of directors on a monthly basis.
 
Capital
 
Nicolet’s managementManagement regularly reviews the adequacy of its capital to ensure that sufficient capital is available for current and future needs and is in compliance with regulatory guidelines. Nicolet’s management actively reviews capital strategies in light of perceived business risks associated with current and prospective earning levels, liquidity, asset quality, economic conditions in the markets served, and level of dividendsreturns available to shareholders. Nicolet’s management intends to maintain an optimal capital and leverage mix for growth and for shareholder return.
 
The Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”) is a U.S. Treasury program made available to community banks, designed to boost lending to small businesses by providing participating banks with capital and liquidity. In particular, the SBLF program targets commercial, industrial, owner-occupied real-estate and agricultural-based lending to qualifying small businesses, which include businesses with less than $50 million in revenue, and promotes outreach to women-owned, veteran-owned and minority-owned businesses.
 
On September 1, 2011, underFor participating banks, the SBLF, Nicolet received $24.4 million from the Treasury for the issuance of 24,400 shares of Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with $1,000 per share liquidation value. The annual dividend rate upon funding and for the following nine full calendar quarters iswas 5%, unless there iswas growth in qualifying small business loans outstanding over a baseline which could reduce the rate to as low as 1% (as determined under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”)), adjusted quarterly. The dividend rate is fixedfixes for the tenth full quarter after funding through the end of the first four and one-half years based on the amount of qualifying small business loans at 7% (unless fixed at a lower rate given increased lending as similarly described above); and finallythat time per the terms of the agreement. The dividend rate is then fixed at 9% after four and one-half years if the preferred stock is not repaid. Nicolet’s weighted averageOn September 1, 2011, under the SBLF, Nicolet received $24.4 million from the Treasury for the issuance of 24,400 shares of Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with $1,000 per share liquidation value. Nicolet paid an annual dividend rate of 5% from funding through September 30, 2013, paid 1% for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, (i.e. the ninth full quarter after funding) and has been 5% between fundingqualified beginning in the first quarter of 2014 for the 1% fixed annual dividend rate for the remainder of the first four and June 30, 2013.one-half years. Nicolet does not have current plans to repay its SBLF funding. Under the terms of the Agreement, Nicolet is required to provide various information, certifications, and reporting to the Treasury. At December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013,2014, Nicolet believes it was in compliance with the requirements set by the Treasury in the Agreement. The preferred stock (under SBLF) qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes.
 
On April 26, 2013, $9.7 million of common stock was issued as part of the merger with Mid-Wisconsin. Concurrently with the merger, Nicolet also closedthrough a private placement, for an aggregate ofthe Company raised $2.9 million in proceeds.  Approximately $401,000capital, issuing 174,016 shares of common stock.
On April 26, 2013, in directconnection with its acquisition of Mid-Wisconsin, the Company issued 589,159 shares of its common stock at a value of $9.7 million. The $0.4 million of incurred issuance costs for the merger and private placement were incurred andwas charged against additional paid in capital. Despite the additional equity issued the effect of the merger transaction reduced overall capital ratios asAs a result of this merger, Nicolet became an SEC-reporting company again and listed its common stock on the increased asset size; however, minimum capital levels were maintained and Nicolet maintains sufficient regulatory capital for current and future needs.Over-the-Counter markets under the trading symbol of “NCBS.”
 
On July 9, 2013 banking regulators issued final guidance on how regulatory capital will be calculated going forward.  Full provisionsJanuary 21, 2014, Nicolet’s board of these regulations will go into effect beginningdirectors approved a resolution authorizing a stock repurchase program whereby Nicolet may utilize up to $6 million to purchase up to 350,000 shares of its outstanding common stock from time to time in 2015.  Nicolet is determining the effect these regulations will have on future capital needs.open market or block transactions as market conditions warrant or in private transactions. During the first six months of 2014, $2.46 million was used to repurchase 124,035 shares with a weighted average price of $19.82 per share including commissions.
 
A summary of Nicolet’s and Nicolet National Bank’s regulatory capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 20132014 and December 31, 20122013 are presented in the following table.
 
Table 19: Capital
                  
 Actual  
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
  
To Be Well
Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions (2)
  Actual  
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
  
To Be Well
Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions (2)
 
(in thousands) Amount  Ratio (1)  Amount  Ratio
(1)
  Amount  Ratio
(1)
  Amount  Ratio
(1)
  Amount  Ratio
(1)
  Amount  Ratio
(1)
 
As of June 30, 2013:                  
As of June 30, 2014:                  
Nicolet                                    
Total capital
 $112,672   13.2% $68,202   8.0%  N/A   N/A  $123,037   14.0% $70,131   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
Tier I capital
  105,014   12.3%  34,101   4.0%  N/A   N/A   113,395   12.9   35,065   4.0   N/A   N/A 
Leverage
  105,014   10.7%  39,120   4.0%  N/A   N/A   113,395   9.7   46,825   4.0   N/A   N/A 
                                                
Nicolet National Bank                                                
Total capital
 $101,855   12.1% $67, 275   8.0% $84,094   10.0% $118,656   13.7% $69,218   8.0% $86,522   10.0%
Tier I capital
  94,197   11.2%  33,637   4.0%  50,456   6.0%  109,014   12.6   34,609   4.0   51,913   6.0 
Leverage
  94,197   9.8%  38,531   4.0%  48,164   5.0%  109,014   9.4   46,366   4.0   57,957   5.0 
                                                
As of December 31, 2012:                        
As of December 31, 2013:                        
Nicolet                                                
Total capital
 $85,738   15.2% $45,098   8.0%  N/A   N/A  $119,050   13.8% $69,075   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
Tier I capital
  78,691   14.0%  22,549   4.0%  N/A   N/A   109,817   12.7   34,538   4.0   N/A   N/A 
Leverage
  78,691   11.0%  28,622   4.0%  N/A   N/A   109,817   9.5   46,322   4.0   N/A   N/A 
                                                
Nicolet National Bank                                                
Total capital
 $77,500   14.1% $43,984   8.0% $54,981   10.0% $111,343   13.1% $68,110   8.0% $85,138   10.0%
Tier I capital
  70,624   12.8%  21,992   4.0%  32,988   6.0%  102,111   12.0   34,055   4.0   51,083   6.0 
Leverage
  70,624   10.1%  27,916   4.0%  34,895   5.0%  102,111   8.9   43,858   4.0   57,323   5.0 


 
(1)
The total capital ratio is defined as tier1 capital plus tier 2 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets. The tier 1 capital ratio is defined as tier1 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets. The leverage ratio is defined as tier1 capital divided by the most recent quarter’s average total assets.
 
(2)
Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable at the bank holding company level.
On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amend the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to Nicolet and Nicolet National Bank. On July 9, 2013, the FDIC also approved, as an interim final rule, the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, following the actions of the Federal Reserve. The final rules implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms, as well as certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
 
The final rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios that will be phased in from 2015 to 2019. The rules include a new minimum common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, which is in addition to the Tier 1 and Tier 2 risk-based capital requirements. The final rules also raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The required minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets will remain 8.0%. The new risk-based capital requirements (except for the capital conservation buffer) will become effective for Nicolet on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer will be phased in over four years beginning on January 1, 2016, with a maximum buffer of 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. Failure to maintain the required capital conservation buffer will result in limitations on capital distributions and on discretionary bonuses to executive officers.
The final rules also implement revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier 1 capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses and instruments that will no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital. The final rules provide that depository holding companies with less than $15 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2009, such as Nicolet, may permanently include trust preferred securities and certain other non-qualifying instruments issued and included in Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital before May 19, 2010 in additional Tier 1 (subject to a maximum of 25% of Tier 1 capital) or Tier 2 capital until maturity or redemption.
The final rules also set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets that the Company will be required to implement beginning January 1, 2015. Based on Nicolet’s current capital composition and levels, management does not presently anticipate that the final rules present a material risk to Nicolet’s financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, under the supervision, and with the participation, of our Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and President and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We and our subsidiaries may be involved from time to time in various routine legal proceedings incidental to our respective businesses. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently engaged in any legal proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not applicable for smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.
 
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed herewith:
Exhibit
Number Description
3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Nicolet Bankshares, Inc., as amended
31.1 Certification of CEO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of CFO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101* Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.

*Indicates information that is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC.
  
  
August 12, 20138, 2014 /s/ Robert B. Atwell 
 Robert B. Atwell
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
August 12, 2013
8, 2014 
/s/ Ann K. Lawson
 
 
Ann K. Lawson
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
52
53