Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.

At ~~July 27,~~October 25, 2006, ~~455,002,495~~452,204,292 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2006			2005		2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1,648		$	1,614	$	3,187		$	3,219		$	1,680		$	1,547		$	4,867		$	4,766
Net investment income		953			842		1,877			1,693			944			902			2,821			2,595
Net investment gains (losses)		(49	)		—		(71	)		(6	)		(6	)		(7	)		(77	)		(13	)
Policy fees and other income		202			154		386			315			186			186			572			501

Total revenues		2,754			2,610		5,379			5,221			2,804			2,628			8,183			7,849

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1,096			1,051		2,131			2,126			1,183			1,026			3,314			3,152
Interest credited		378			347		751			687			383			364			1,134			1,051
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		521			523		996			970			533			506			1,529			1,476
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		207			208		381			401			170			217			551			618
Interest expense		88			69		170			141			87			72			257			213

Total benefits and expenses		2,290			2,198		4,429			4,325			2,356			2,185			6,785			6,510

Net earnings before income taxes and accounting change		464			412		950			896
Income before income taxes and accounting change													448			443			1,398			1,339
Provision for income taxes		147			127		303			289			144			136			447			425

Net earnings before accounting change		317			285		647			607
Net income before accounting change													304			307			951			914
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes		—			—		4			—			—			—			4			—

Net earnings	$	317		$	285	$	651		$	607
Net income												$	304		$	307		$	955		$	914

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.70		$	0.61	$	1.41		$	1.27		$	0.67		$	0.65		$	2.08		$	1.92

Diluted	$	0.68		$	0.60	$	1.37		$	1.25		$	0.65		$	0.64		$	2.02		$	1.88

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		455.8			470.4		461.3			479.6			453.8			470.7			458.8			476.7

Diluted		468.3			477.4		473.9			485.9			467.2			481.1			471.7			484.7


	June 30, 2006			December 31, 2005			September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	52,316		$	53,937		$	54,280		$	53,937
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value		187			206			192			206
Commercial mortgage loans		8,203			7,558			8,315			7,558
Policy loans		1,485			1,350			1,498			1,350
Restricted investments held by securitization entities		—			685			—			685
Other invested assets		1,840			3,174			3,050			3,174

Total investments		64,031			66,910			67,335			66,910
Cash and cash equivalents		2,351			1,875			2,302			1,875
Accrued investment income		663			733			760			733
Deferred acquisition costs		6,042			5,586			6,166			5,586
Intangible assets		942			782			884			782
Goodwill		1,486			1,450			1,488			1,450
Reinsurance recoverable		17,789			18,245			17,661			18,245
Other assets		717			967			1,167			967
Separate account assets		9,625			9,106			10,084			9,106

Total assets	$	103,646		$	105,654		$	107,847		$	105,654

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Future annuity and contract benefits	$	63,614		$	63,749		$	63,593		$	63,749
Liability for policy and contract claims		3,297			3,364			3,389			3,364
Unearned premiums		3,956			3,647			4,180			3,647
Other policyholder liabilities		484			507			509			507
Other liabilities		3,652			4,937			5,167			4,937
Non-recourse funding obligations		2,150			1,400			2,450			1,400
Short-term borrowings		295			152			295			152
Long-term borrowings		2,741			2,736			2,730			2,736
Senior notes underlying equity units		600			600			600			600
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		100			100			100			100
Deferred tax liability		922			1,386			1,441			1,386
Borrowings related to securitization entities		—			660			—			660
Separate account liabilities		9,625			9,106			10,084			9,106

Total liabilities		91,436			92,344			94,538			92,344

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 1.5 billion shares authorized; 491 million and 404 million shares issued as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively; 455 million and 385 million shares outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively		—			—
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value; 700 million shares authorized; zero and 86 million shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively		—			—
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 1.5 billion shares authorized; 492 million and 404 million shares issued as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively; 452 million and 385 million shares outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively								—			—
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value; 700 million shares authorized; zero and 86 million shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively								—			—
Additional paid-in capital		10,713			10,671			10,737			10,671

Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		(312	)		760			437			760
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		212			389			377			389
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		333			255			352			255

Total accumulated other comprehensive income		233			1,404
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)								1,166			1,404
Retained earnings		2,317			1,735			2,581			1,735
Treasury stock, at cost (37 million and 19 million shares as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively)		(1,053	)		(500	)
Treasury stock, at cost (40 million and 19 million shares as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively)								(1,175	)		(500	)

Total stockholders’ equity		12,210			13,310			13,309			13,310

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	103,646		$	105,654		$	107,847		$	105,654


	Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income			Retained earnings			Treasury stock, at cost			Total stockholders’ equity			Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Retained earnings			Treasury stock, at cost			Total stockholders’ equity
Balances as of December 31, 2004	$	10,612	$	1,608		$	646		$	—		$	12,866		$	10,612	$	1,608		$	646		$	—		$	12,866
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings							607						607
Net income																—		—			914			—			914
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities				519									519			—		21			—			—			21
Derivatives qualifying as hedges				138									138			—		131			—			—			131
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments				(102	)								(102	)		—		(47	)		—			—			(47	)

Total comprehensive income (loss)													1,162														1,019
Acquisition of treasury stock										(500	)		(500	)		—		—			—			(500	)		(500	)
Dividends to stockholders							(61	)					(61	)		—		—			(96	)		—			(96	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises		25											25			35		—			—			—			35
Capital contributions from GE		14											14			4		—			—			—			4

Balances as of June 30, 2005	$	10,651	$	2,163		$	1,192		$	(500	)	$	13,506
Balances as of September 30, 2005															$	10,651	$	1,713		$	1,464		$	(500	)	$	13,328


	Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income			Retained earnings			Treasury stock, at cost			Total stockholders’ equity			Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Retained earnings			Treasury stock, at cost			Total stockholders’ equity
Balances as of December 31, 2005	$	10,671	$	1,404		$	1,735		$	(500	)	$	13,310		$	10,671	$	1,404		$	1,735		$	(500	)	$	13,310
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings							651						651
Net income																—		—			955			—			955
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities				(1,072	)								(1,072	)		—		(323	)		—			—			(323	)
Derivatives qualifying as hedges				(177	)								(177	)		—		(12	)		—			—			(12	)
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments				78									78			—		97			—			—			97

Total comprehensive income (loss)													(520	)													717
Acquisition of treasury stock										(553	)		(553	)		—		—			—			(675	)		(675	)
Dividends to stockholders							(69	)					(69	)		—		—			(109	)		—			(109	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises		38											38			61		—			—			—			61
Capital contributions from GE		4											4			5		—			—			—			5

Balances as of June 30, 2006	$	10,713	$	233		$	2,317		$	(1,053	)	$	12,210
Balances as of September 30, 2006															$	10,737	$	1,166		$	2,581		$	(1,175	)	$	13,309


	Six months ended June 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	651		$	607
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating activities:
Net income							$	955		$	914
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Amortization of fixed maturity discounts and premiums		12			33			18			42
Net investment (gains) losses		71			6
Net investment gains (losses)								77			13
Charges assessed to policyholders		(177	)		(152	)		(255	)		(248	)
Cumulative effect of accounting policy change		(4	)		—			(4	)		—
Acquisition costs deferred		(607	)		(531	)		(909	)		(832	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		381			401			551			618
Deferred income taxes		182			218			219			483
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets, net		144			117			(10	)		48
Insurance reserves		1,476			1,183			2,427			2,013
Current tax liabilities		44			(53	)		108			(170	)
Other liabilities and other policy-related balances		(176	)		(466	)		173			(457	)

Net cash from operating activities		1,997			1,363			3,350			2,424

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments of investments:
Fixed maturities		2,802			2,086			4,174			3,750
Mortgage loans		554			432
Commercial mortgage loans								830			770
Proceeds from sales of investments:
Fixed maturities and equity securities		2,918			2,332			3,683			2,409
Purchases and originations of investments:
Fixed maturities and equity securities		(5,564	)		(4,844	)		(8,179	)		(7,851	)
Mortgage loans		(1,183	)		(1,249	)
Commercial mortgage loans								(1,573	)		(2,008	)
Other invested assets, net		(10	)		213			(51	)		204
Policy loans, net		(135	)		(9	)		(147	)		(129	)
Payments for business purchased, net of cash acquired		(134	)		—			(291	)		—

Net cash from investing activities		(752	)		(1,039	)		(1,554	)		(2,855	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of investment contracts		3,774			3,815			5,585			6,359
Redemption and benefit payments on investment contracts		(4,827	)		(4,147	)		(7,396	)		(5,899	)
Short-term borrowing activity, net		143			(30	)
Short-term borrowings and other, net								153			(393	)
Proceeds from issuance of non-recourse funding obligations		750			200			1,050			500
Proceeds from long-term borrowings								—			348
Dividends paid to stockholders		(69	)		(61	)		(103	)		(93	)
Stock-based compensation awards exercised		20			2			32			(2	)
Acquisition of treasury stock		(553	)		(500	)		(675	)		(500	)
Capital contribution received from GE		2			13			3			19

Net cash from financing activities		(760	)		(708	)		(1,351	)		339
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(9	)		(61	)		(18	)		(37	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		476			(445	)		427			(129	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,875			1,963			1,875			1,963

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2,351		$	1,518		$	2,302		$	1,834

Genworth Financial, Inc. (“Genworth”) was incorporated in Delaware on October 23, 2003 in preparation for the corporate reorganization of certain insurance and related subsidiaries of the General Electric Company (“GE”) and an initial public offering of Genworth common stock, which was completed on May 28, 2004 (“IPO”). In connection with the IPO, Genworth acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. (“GEFAHI”). Prior to its IPO, Genworth was a wholly-owned subsidiary of GEFAHI. GEFAHI is an indirect subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE Capital”), which in turn is an indirect subsidiary of GE. Prior to the corporate reorganization, GEFAHI was a holding company for a group of companies that provide life insurance, long-term care insurance, group life and health insurance, annuities, investment products and U.S. mortgage insurance. At the same time, Genworth also acquired certain other insurance businesses previously owned by other GE subsidiaries. These businesses included international mortgage insurance, payment protection insurance, a Bermuda reinsurer, and mortgage contract underwriting.

The accompanying condensed financial statements include on a consolidated basis the accounts of Genworth and our affiliate companies in which we hold a majority voting or economic interest, which we refer to as the “company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” unless the context otherwise requires. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We are a leading insurance company in the U.S., with an expanding international presence, serving the life and lifestyle protection, retirement income, investment and mortgage insurance needs of more than 15 million customers. We have leadership positions in key products that we expect will benefit from a number of significant demographic, governmental and market trends. We distribute our products and services through an extensive and diversified distribution network that includes financial intermediaries, independent producers and dedicated sales specialists. We conduct operations in 24 countries and have approximately 7,000 employees. We have the following four segments:

On March 8, 2006, GEFAHI completed an offering (“Secondary Offering”) of 71.2 million shares of our Class B Common Stock. The 71.2 million shares were automatically converted to Class A Common Stock upon the sale of these shares to the public. We did not receive any proceeds in the Secondary Offering. Concurrently

with the Secondary Offering, we repurchased 15.0 million shares of Class B Common Stock from our majority stockholder at a price of $31.93125 per share (the net proceeds per share received by the selling stockholder from the

underwriters), which is recorded at cost as treasury stock in the unaudited condensed consolidated ~~statement of financial position.~~balance sheet. As a result of these transactions, GEFAHI no longer owns any of our outstanding common stock.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary by management to present a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flow for the periods presented. The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes contained in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On January 1, 2006, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R,Share-Based Payment, an amendment of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We adopted SFAS No. 123R under the modified prospective transition method. The statement requires companies to recognize the grant-date fair value of options and other equity-based awards within the income statement over the respective vesting period of the awards. We adopted SFAS No. 123 effective January 1, 2002 and, as permitted, we determined a grant date fair value using a Black-Scholes model (“Black-Scholes Model”) and recognized the related compensation expense through the income statement for all equity awards issued subsequent to January 1, 2002. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we will continue to recognize the remaining portion of the requisite service under previously granted unvested awards including those awards granted prior to January 1, 2002. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we adjusted compensation cost related to forfeiture of awards when the actual forfeiture occurred. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates and requires companies which previously accounted for forfeitures on an occurrence basis to include in income of the period of adoption a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the adjustment to reflect estimated forfeitures for prior periods. On January 1, 2006, we recognized an increase to net ~~earnings~~income of $4 million related to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. See Note 65 for additional information.

As of January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole, eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host, if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. In addition, among other changes, SFAS No. 155 (i) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133; (ii) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are

hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (iii) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and (iv) eliminates the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) from holding a derivative financial instrument that

pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial interest. Adoption of SFAS No. 155 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 05-1,Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts.This statement provides guidance on accounting for deferred acquisition costs and other ~~deferred~~ balances on an internal replacement, defined broadly as a modification in product benefits, features, rights, or coverages that occurs by the exchange of an existing contract for a new contract, or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to an existing contract, or by the election of a benefit, feature, right, or coverage within an existing contract. ~~Depending on the type of modification, the period over which these deferred balances will be recognized could be accelerated.~~ SOP 05-1 is effective for internal replacements occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The insurance industry has identified several implementation issues during their evaluation of SOP 05-1. An expert panel has been formed by the AICPA to evaluate certain of these interpretive issues that insurance companies are facing in their implementation. Based on our current interpretation, the adoption of SOP 05-1 will result in the shortening of the period over which our group life and health insurance business deferred acquisition costs are amortized. Transition to the shorter amortization period will occur throughout 2007 as each of our in-force contracts renew. Accordingly, under our current interpretation, we expect the transition in 2007 will result in additional amortization of deferred acquisition costs of approximately $60 to $65 million, net of tax. We ~~are currently evaluating~~do not expect any material financial statement impact from transition beyond 2007. Due to the nature of the interpretative issues being reviewed by the expert panel, we continue to evaluate the impact ~~that~~ SOP 05-1 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Depending upon the outcome of the evaluation of these issues by the expert panel, we may refine our estimates of the associated impact related to our adoption of SOP 05-1.

In July 2006, FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,was issued. This guidance clarifies what criteria must be met prior to recognition of the financial statement benefit of a position taken in a tax return. Additionally, it applies to the recognition and measurement of income tax uncertainties resulting from a purchase business combination. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact FIN No. 48 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective prospectively with a limited form of retrospective application for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 with early adoption encouraged. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.This statement requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 is effective prospectively for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006.The adoption of SFAS No. 158 will not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net ~~earnings~~income by the weighted average basic common shares outstanding and by the weighted average diluted common shares outstanding for the periods presented:

~~The following table sets forth information about our net investment income for the components of our investment portfolio for the periods presented:~~

~~The following table sets forth net investment gains (losses) for the periods presented:~~

Derivative instruments primarily consist of changes in fair value on the non-qualifying derivatives, including embedded derivatives, changes in fair value of certain derivatives and related hedged items in fair value hedge relationships and hedge ineffectiveness on qualifying derivative instruments. Effective April 1, 2006, we began classifying changes in fair value of these derivative items as net investment gains (losses). These items were previously included as a component of net investment income, interest credited and benefits and other changes in policy reserves. The amount of these derivative items in prior periods that were included in the aforementioned categories was not material.

For the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we recognized impairments of $4 million and $3 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we recognized impairments of $5 million and $37 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the three months

ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was $1,227 million and $481 million, respectively, which was approximately 96% and 98% of book value, respectively. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was $2,068 million and $1,158 million, respectively, which was approximately 96% and 99% of book value, respectively. The loss on sales of securities in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily driven by the higher interest rate environment.

As of June 30, 2006, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses), and estimated fair value of our fixed maturities and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:

As of December 31, 2005, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses), and estimated fair value of our fixed maturities and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:

Included in other invested assets are certain securities that are designated as trading and, accordingly, are held at fair value with changes in fair value included in net investment gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of the trading portfolio was $31 million and $15 million, respectively.

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of our investment securities, aggregated by investment type and length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2006:

The investment securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2006 consisted of 3,835 securities accounting for unrealized losses of $1.4 billion. Of these unrealized losses 93% were investment grade (rated AAA through BBB-) and 98% were less than 20% below cost. The amount of the unrealized loss on these securities was primarily attributable to increases in interest rates.

Of the investment securities in an unrealized loss position for twelve months or more as of June 30, 2006, 14 securities were 20% or more below cost, including 8 securities which were also below investment grade

(rated BB+ and below). These 8 securities accounted for unrealized losses of $8 million. These securities consisted of four issuers primarily in the automotive and airline industries and were current on all terms. All airline securities were collateralized by commercial jet aircraft associated with one domestic airline. We believe these airline security holdings were in a temporary loss position as a result of ongoing negative market reaction to difficulties in the commercial airline industry. The unrealized loss on the automotive investments was primarily caused by deteriorating market share and legacy issues. The automotive issuer continues to maintain significant liquidity relative to its maturity and we currently expect to collect full principal and interest.

As of June 30, 2006, we expected these investments to continue to perform in accordance with their original contractual terms and we generally have the ability and intent to hold these investment securities until the recovery of the fair value up to the cost of the investment, which may be maturity. Accordingly, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2006. However, from time to time, we may sell securities in the ordinary course of managing our portfolio to meet diversification, credit quality, yield enhancement, asset-liability management and liquidity requirements.

The following table sets forth our positions in derivative instruments and the estimated fair values as of the dates indicated. The fair value of derivative instruments, including financial futures, interest rate and foreign currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and equity index options, are based upon quotations obtained from dealers or other reliable sources.

As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of derivatives in a gain position and recorded in other invested assets was $286 million and $559 million, respectively, and the fair value of derivatives in a loss position and recorded in other liabilities was $29 million and $26 million, respectively.

On May 1, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, Tennessee (“Continental Life”), for $145 million, plus contingent consideration of $5 million per year for two years based on attaining certain sales production thresholds. Continental Life’s business provides primarily Medicare supplement insurance and is a part of our Protection segment. This acquisition was accounted for ~~as a~~using the purchase ~~business combination.~~method. The excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired of $29 million has been recorded as goodwill. In addition, $93 million of present value of future profits was recorded in connection with this transaction. The results of operations of Continental Life have been included in our consolidated results beginning May 1, 2006. We have reflected our initial allocation of the purchase price based on estimated fair value according to preliminary valuations. Such estimated values may change as additional information is obtained and the valuation is finalized.

On ~~June 29,~~July 3, 2006, we ~~agreed~~completed the acquisition of Vero Lenders Mortgage Insurance Limited (“Vero LMI”), a subsidiary of Vero Insurance Limited, which had been a wholly owned by Promina Group Limited of Sydney, Australia, for $82 million, net of post-closing dividends to ~~acquire~~us. Vero LMI consists solely of a run-off mortgage insurance block and is part of our Mortgage Insurance segment. This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method. Present value of future profits of $4 million and no goodwill was recorded in connection with this transaction. We have reflected our initial allocation of the purchase price based on estimated fair value according to preliminary valuations. Such estimated values may change as additional information is obtained and the valuation is finalized.

On October 20, 2006, we acquired AssetMark Investment Services, Inc. (“AssetMark”) of Pleasant Hill, California, for approximately $230 million. AssetMark is an investment management and adviser company with

more than $8$9 billion in third-party assets under management. Under terms of the agreement, we may pay additional performance-based payments of up to $100 million over three to five years. ~~This transaction is expected to close in the third or fourth quarter~~To fund this acquisition, we issued a total of ~~2006.~~

~~On July 3, 2006, we completed the acquisition~~$223 million of ~~Vero Lenders Mortgage Insurance Limited (“Vero LMI”), a subsidiary~~commercial paper at an interest rate of Vero Insurance Limited, which is wholly owned by Promina Group Limited of Sydney, Australia, for approximately $80 million, net of a post-closing dividend. Vero LMI consists solely of a run-off mortgage insurance block.5.29%. This transaction will be recorded in the ~~third~~fourth quarter of 2006.

On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R under the modified prospective transition method. The statement requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and deferred stock units (“DSUs”) under the 2004 Genworth Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Incentive Plan”). We previously accounted for these awards under the fair value expense provisions of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, on January 1, 2006, we recognized a $4 million after-tax increase to ~~earnings~~income related to our cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R.

We have recorded stock-based compensation expense related to the estimated value of the RSUs, DSUs, SARs and stock options for the periods presented:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006		2005		2006		2005		2006		2005
Stock-based compensation	$	12	$	12	$	24	$	22
Stock-based compensation expense									$	11	$	14	$	36	$	36

For awards issued prior to January 1, 2006, stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a graded vesting attribution method over the awards’ respective vesting schedule. For awards issued after January 1, 2006, stock-based compensation expense is recognized evenly on a straight-line attribution method over the awards’ respective vesting period.

For purposes of determining the estimated fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant we use the Black-Scholes Model. The Black-Scholes Model requires the input of certain assumptions that involve judgment. Management will continue to assess the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate estimated fair value of share-based compensation. Circumstances may change and additional data may become available over time, which could result in changes to these assumptions and methodologies.

The following table contains the stock option weighted-average grant-date fair value information and related valuation assumptions for ~~June~~the nine months ending September 30, 2006 and 2005. Fair value is estimated using the Black-Scholes Model.


	June 30, 2006			June 30, 2005			2006			2005
Estimated fair value per option	$	11.50		$	9.63		$	11.60		$	10.49
Valuation Assumptions:
Expected term (years)		6			6			6.0			6.0
Expected volatility		28.0	%		33.3	%		28.0	%		30.2	%
Expected dividend yield		0.9	%		1.1	%		0.9	%		1.1	%
Risk-free interest rate		5.0	%		4.0	%		4.8	%		4.0	%

Under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, we are authorized to grant 38 million equity awards.

~~Under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, we are authorized to grant 38 million equity awards.~~

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, we granted ~~24,000~~1,705,410 and ~~25,839~~1,700,439 stock options with exercise prices ranging from ~~$32.45~~$33.27 to ~~$33.46,~~$34.13, and ~~$27.78~~$30.79 to ~~$29.90,~~$32.27, respectively, which equaled the closing market prices on the date of grant and have an exercise term of 10 years. The stock options will vest in 20% annual increments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Additionally, during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 we issued ~~6,000~~448,934 and ~~20,122~~504,573 RSUs with restriction periods ranging from 3 to 5 years and a fair value of ~~$32.45,~~$34.13, and ~~$27.96,~~$32.08, respectively, which is measured at the market price of a share of our nonrestricted stock on the grant date. ~~There were no SARs granted~~Additionally, during ~~these periods.~~

~~For~~ the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, we granted ~~24,000~~730,600 and ~~111,663~~628,500 SARs with exercise prices of $34.13 and $32.10, respectively.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we granted 1,729,410 and 1,802,103 stock options with exercise prices ranging from ~~$32.45~~$33.27 to ~~$33.46~~$34.13 and $26.68 to ~~$29.90,~~$32.27, respectively, which equaled the closing market prices on the date of grant and have an exercise term of 10 years. The stock options will vest in 20% annual increments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Additionally, during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 we issued ~~6,000~~454,934 and ~~326,964~~831,537 RSUs with restriction periods ranging from 3 to 5 years and a fair value of ~~$32.45~~$34.11 and ~~$27.07,~~$30.11, respectively, which is measured at the market price of a share of our nonrestricted stock on the grant date. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we granted 730,600 and 628,500 SARs with exercise prices of $34.13 and $32.10, respectively. There were ~~no SARs granted during these periods. There were 14,308,206~~15,161,276 and ~~14,547,263~~16,054,088 stock options, ~~1,829,149~~2,125,255 and ~~1,397,239~~1,822,443 RSUs and ~~6,393,713~~6,577,713 and ~~6,255,213~~6,883,713 SARs outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

A summary of stock option activity as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and changes during the ~~six~~nine months then ended is presented below:


	Shares subject to option		Weighted average exercise price		Shares subject to option		Weighted average exercise price
Balance as of January 1, 2006	15,770,646		$	21.93	15,770,646		$	21.93
Granted	24,000		$	32.79	1,729,410		$	34.11
Exercised	(1,127,876	)	$	19.47	(1,761,127	)	$	19.97
Forfeited	(358,564	)	$	21.34	(577,653	)	$	21.99
Expired	—				—

Balance as of June 30, 2006	14,308,206		$	22.16
Balance as of September 30, 2006					15,161,276		$	23.54

Exercisable as of June 30, 2006	4,688,323		$	23.03

Exercisable as of September 30, 2006					4,907,611		$	23.38

A summary of the status of our other equity-based awards as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and the changes during the ~~six~~nine months then ended is presented below:


	Restricted stock units (RSUs)				Deferred stock units (DSUs)			Stock appreciation rights (SARs)				Restricted stock units (RSUs)				Deferred stock units (DSUs)			Stock appreciation rights (SARs)
	Number of awards		Weighted average grant date fair value		Number of awards	Weighted average fair value		Number of awards		Weighted average grant date fair value		Number of awards		Weighted average grant date fair value		Number of awards	Weighted average fair value		Number of awards		Weighted average grant date fair value
Balance as of January 1, 2006	1,879,761		$	24.74	16,868	$	32.12	6,883,713		$	7.02	1,879,761		$	24.74	16,868	$	32.12	6,883,713		$	7.02
Granted	6,000		$	32.45	8,148	$	31.90	—				454,934		$	34.11	21,143	$	32.57	730,600		$	11.60
Exercised	(67	)	$	32.10	—			(240,000	)	$	6.65	(113,070	)	$	19.51	—			(515,000	)	$	6.65
Terminated	(56,545	)	$	27.10	—			(250,000	)	$	6.65	(96,370	)	$	27.40	—			(521,600	)	$	7.43

Balance as of June 30, 2006	1,829,149		$	24.70	25,016	$	31.88	6,393,713		$	7.01
Balance as of September 30, 2006												2,125,255		$	26.90	38,011	$	33.63	6,577,713		$	7.48

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, there was ~~$71~~$98 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested awards not yet recognized. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years.

Cash received from stock options exercised for the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~June~~September 30, 2006 was ~~$20~~$32 million. New shares were issued to settle all exercised awards. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from ~~stock option exercises~~the exercise of equity based awards was $6 million ~~both~~and $12 million for the three and ~~six months ended June~~nine month period ending September 30, 2006, respectively.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006:


	Outstanding				Exercisable			Outstanding				Exercisable
Exercise price range	Shares in thousands	Average life⁽¹⁾	Average exercise price		Shares in thousands	Average exercise price		Shares in thousands	Average life⁽¹⁾	Average exercise price		Shares in thousands	Average exercise price
$14.11 – $18.51	1,489,570	6.20	$	17.28	734,395	$	17.28	1,389,603	5.95	$	17.28	1,037,627	$	17.28
$19.45 – $22.67	9,210,584	7.67		19.77	2,131,347		20.01	8,644,142	7.43	$	19.76	1,818,316	$	20.10
$23.20 – $27.95	1,558,010	4.60		26.99	1,456,277		27.08	1,436,559	4.27	$	27.00	1,387,044	$	27.05
$28.00 – $36.62	2,049,081	8.21		32.75	365,343		36.00	3,690,011	8.83	$	33.40	663,663	$	34.25
$37.89 – $39.60	961	5.07		38.77	961		38.77	961	4.82	$	38.77	961	$	38.77

	14,308,206	7.26	$	22.16	4,688,323	$	23.03	15,161,276	7.33	$	23.54	4,907,611	$	23.38

We face a significant risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, we were committed to fund ~~$318~~$329 million in U.S. commercial mortgage ~~loans~~loan investments and ~~$168~~$191 million in limited ~~partnerships.~~

~~During the second quarter of 2006, we agreed to acquire Vero LMI and AssetMark, as further described in note 5 of these condensed consolidated financial statements.~~partnership investments.

In March 2006, we issued $229 million of commercial paper and we used the proceeds from this issuance to finance a stock repurchase from GEFAHI concurrently with its secondary offering. The notes under the

commercial paper program are offered pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 and may have a maturity of up to 364 days from the date of issue. During the second quarter, we reduced the outstanding balance of our commercial paper by $85 million. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on commercial paper outstanding was ~~5.17%~~5.26% and 3.29%, respectively, and the weighted average maturity was 3028 and 53 days, respectively.

From October 19, 2006 to October 20, 2006, we issued a total of $223 million of commercial paper at an interest rate of 5.29%, to fund the AssetMark acquisition that closed on October 20, 2006, as further described in note 4 of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

On May 25, 2006 we entered into a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility, which matures in May 2011, replacing our $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to mature in May 2009. We also have a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility that matures in April 2010. These facilities bear variable interest rates based on a one-month LIBOR plus a margin. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, we had no borrowings under these facilities; however, we utilized ~~$170~~$171 million of the commitment under these facilities for the issuance of a letter of credit for the benefit of one of our Mortgage Insurance subsidiaries.

On January 20, 2006, River Lake Insurance Company III (“River Lake III”), a special purpose financial captive insurance company wholly owned by First Colony Life Insurance Company (“First Colony”), ~~itself an~~our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, ~~of Genworth,~~ issued $750 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate surplus notes due 2036 (the ~~“Notes”~~“RL III Notes”). River Lake III has received regulatory approval to issue additional series of its floating rate surplus notes up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion (including the RL III Notes), but is under no obligation to do so.

On September 22, 2006, River Lake Insurance Company (“River Lake I”), a special purpose captive insurance company wholly owned by First Colony, issued $300 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate surplus notes due 2033 (the “RL I Notes”). River Lake I previously received approval from the Director of Insurance of the State of South Carolina (the “Director”) on July 23, 2003 to issue up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion of its floating rate surplus notes and has issued an aggregate of $1.1 billion to date (including the RL I Notes). Despite having additional capacity, River Lake I does not expect to issue any additional notes.

As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on our non-recourse funding obligations was 5.32% and 4.50%, respectively. The non-recourse funding obligations bear variable interest rates, and their carrying value approximates fair value as of September 30, 2006.

On October 24, 2006, Rivermont Life Insurance Company I (“Rivermont I”), a special purpose financial captive insurance company wholly owned by First Colony, issued $315 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate surplus notes due 2050 (the “Rivermont I Notes”). Rivermont I has received regulatory approval to issue additional series of its floating rate surplus notes up to an aggregate principal amount of $475 million (including the Rivermont I Notes), but is under no obligation to do so. The Rivermont I Notes are direct financial obligations of ~~River Lake III~~Rivermont I and are not guaranteed by First Colony or Genworth.

reinsured ~~on a coinsurance basis~~ from First Colony, on a combination coinsurance and modified coinsurance basis, certain ~~term~~universal life insurance policies ~~having guaranteed level premiums.~~ with secondary guarantees written or reinsured by First Colony. Genworth has agreed to provide a limited guaranty to Rivermont I to mitigate certain interest rate risks associated with this reinsurance. Genworth has agreed to provide a limited guaranty to Rivermont I to mitigate certain interest rate risks associated with this reinsurance. First Colony has also agreed to indemnify Rivermont I for certain limited costs.

The Rivermont I Notes ~~were~~have been sold to a third-party for deposit into certain Delaware trusts (the “Trusts”) that ~~have issued~~will issue money market ~~and term securities. The principal and interest payments due on the money market and~~or term securities ~~were insured by a third party insurance company.~~(the “Securities”). The holders of the Rivermont I Notes cannot require repayment from Genworth or any of its subsidiaries, other than ~~River Lake III,~~Rivermont I, the direct issuer of the Rivermont I Notes. ~~First Colony~~Genworth has also agreed, under certain circumstances, to ~~indemnify River Lake III and~~provide to the ~~third party insurer for~~Trusts a certain ~~limited costs.~~amount of liquidity in the event that the Trusts do not have sufficient funds available to fully redeem the Securities at the stated maturity date.

~~River Lake III~~Rivermont I will pay interest on the principal amount of the Rivermont I Notes on a monthly basis, subject to regulatory approval. Any payment of principal of, including by redemption, or interest on the Rivermont I Notes may only be made with the prior approval of the Director of Insurance of the State of South Carolina in accordance with the terms of its licensing order and in accordance with applicable law. The holders of the Rivermont I Notes have no rights to accelerate payment of principal of the Rivermont I Notes under any circumstances, including without limitation, for nonpayment or breach of any covenant. ~~River Lake III~~Rivermont I reserves the right to repay the Rivermont I Notes at any time, subject to the terms of the Rivermont I Notes and prior regulatory approval.

As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on our non-recourse funding obligations was 5.34% and 4.50%, respectively. The non-recourse funding obligations bear variable interest rates, carrying value approximates fair value as of June 30, 2006.

GE Capital, our former indirect majority stockholder, provides credit and liquidity support to a funding conduit it sponsored, which exposes it to a majority of the risks and rewards of the conduit’s activities and

therefore makes GE Capital the primary beneficiary of the funding conduit. Upon adoption of FIN No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, GE Capital was required to consolidate the funding conduit because of this financial support. As a result, assets and liabilities of certain previously off-balance sheet securitization entities, for which we were the transferor, were required to be included in our condensed consolidated financial statements because the funding conduit no longer qualified as a third-party. Because these securitization entities lost their qualifying status, we were required to recognize $1.2 billion of securitized assets and $1.1 billion of associated liabilities in our condensed consolidated ~~statement of financial position~~balance sheet in July 2003. The assets and liabilities associated with these securitization entities have been reported in the corresponding financial statement captions in our condensed consolidated ~~statement of financial position,~~balance sheet, and the assets are noted as restricted due to the lack of legal control we have over them. We apply the same accounting policies to these restricted assets and liabilities as we do to our unrestricted assets and liabilities.

As a result of GE Capital no longer having an ownership interest in us in March 2006, the respective funding conduit re-qualified as a third-party and these securitization entities regained their qualifying status under SFAS No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities. As a result, the assets were effectively re-securitized and the related assets and liabilities were derecognized from our condensed consolidated financial statements. This resulted in a reduction from December 31, 2005 balances of $685 million, $44 million, $660 million and $15 million of restricted investments held by securitization entities, other assets, borrowings related to securitization entities and other liabilities, respectively. We continue to hold a retained interest in the form of interest-only strips classified as fixed maturity securities available-for-sale on our condensed consolidated statements of financial position. We recognized an investment loss on sale of $11 million, net of tax, from this re-securitization transaction.

We conduct our operations in four business segments: (1) Protection, which includes our life insurance, long-term care insurance, linked benefit products, Medicare supplement insurance, group life and health insurance and payment protection insurance; (2) Retirement Income and Investments, which includes our fixed annuities, individual ~~and~~variable annuities, group variable annuities ~~and~~designed for 401(k) plans, single premium immediate annuities, variable life insurance, ~~asset management and~~ specialized products, including GICs, funding agreements, and FABNs, and ~~structured settlements;~~asset management products and services; (3) Mortgage Insurance, which includes our mortgage insurance products and mortgage related services that facilitate homeownership by enabling borrowers to buy homes with low-down-payment mortgages; and (4) Corporate and Other, which includes interest and other debt financing expenses and other corporate income and expenses not allocated to the segments, as well as the results of a small, non-core business managed outside our operating segments.

In 2006, we began to allocate net investment gains (losses) from our Corporate and Other segment to our Protection (except payment protection insurance) and Retirement Income and Investments segments using an approach based principally upon the investment portfolio established to support each of those segments’ products and targeted capital levels. We do not allocate net investment gains (losses) from our Corporate and Other segment to our Mortgage Insurance segment or to our payment protection insurance business within the Protection segment, because they have their own separate investment portfolios, and net investment gains (losses) from those portfolios are reflected in the Mortgage Insurance and Protection segment results, respectively.

Prior to 2006, all net investment gains (losses) were recorded in the Corporate and Other segment and were not reflected in the results of any of our other segments.

Effective January 1, 2006, GE Seguros (“Seguros”), a small Mexican-domiciled multi-line insurer, previously included in our Corporate and Other segment, is being managed within our Protection segment and whose results are now included as part of the payment protection insurance business. Segment information related to the Seguros move is reflected in all periods presented.

We use the same accounting policies and procedures to measure segment net operating ~~earnings~~income and assets as our consolidated net ~~earnings~~income and assets. Segment net operating ~~earnings represent~~income represents the basis on which the performance of our business is assessed by management. Segment net operating ~~earnings exclude~~income excludes after-tax net investment gains (losses) (which can fluctuate significantly from period to period), and other adjustments, changes in accounting principles and infrequent or unusual non-operating items. There were no non-recurring, infrequent or unusual items excluded from net operating ~~earnings~~income for the periods presented.

The following is a summary of revenues, segment net operating ~~earnings~~income and reconciliation to total company net ~~earnings~~income for the periods presented:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Revenues
Protection	$	1,639		$	1,531		$	3,191		$	3,073		$	1,654		$	1,564		$	4,845		$	4,637
Retirement Income and Investments		726			735			1,439			1,470			762			705			2,201			2,175
Mortgage Insurance		364			300			699			594			356			303			1,055			897
Corporate and Other		25			44			50			84			32			56			82			140

Total revenues	$	2,754		$	2,610		$	5,379		$	5,221		$	2,804		$	2,628		$	8,183		$	7,849

Segment net operating earnings (losses)
Segment net operating income (losses)
Protection	$	151		$	133		$	300		$	272		$	152		$	145		$	452		$	417
Retirement Income and Investments		57			60			118			120			53			59			171			179
Mortgage Insurance		162			121			311			262			134			126			445			388
Corporate and Other		(31	)		(29	)		(45	)		(43	)		(32	)		(19	)		(77	)		(62	)

Total segment net operating earnings		339			285			684			611
Total segment net operating income														307			311			991			922
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments		(22	)		—			(37	)		(4	)		(3	)		(4	)		(40	)		(8	)

Net earnings before accounting change		317			285			647			607
Net income before accounting change														304			307			951			914
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes		—			—			4			—			—			—			4			—

Net earnings	$	317		$	285		$	651		$	607
Net income													$	304		$	307		$	955		$	914


(Amounts in millions)	June 30, 2006		December 31, 2005		September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Assets
Protection	$	35,598	$	33,945	$	37,793	$	33,945
Retirement Income and Investments		57,749		58,281		58,207		58,281
Mortgage Insurance		7,580		7,118		8,000		7,118
Corporate and Other		2,719		6,310		3,847		6,310

Total assets	$	103,646	$	105,654	$	107,847	$	105,654

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein.

This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “will,” or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the outlook for our future business and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially due to global political, economic, business, competitive, market, regulatory and other factors and risks, including the following:

under our tax matters agreement even if our corresponding tax savings either are delayed or never materialize, the possibility that in the

event of a change in control of our company we would have insufficient funds to meet accelerated obligations under the tax matters agreement, the possibility that certain service agreements with GE are not extended on favorable terms, and the significance of our distribution relationship with GE in our payment protection insurance business.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

We are a leading insurance company in the U.S., with an expanding international presence. We have three operating segments: Protection, Retirement Income and Investments, and Mortgage Insurance.

We also have a Corporate and Other segment, which consists primarily of unallocated corporate income and expenses, the results of a small, non-core business that is managed outside our operating segments, and most of our interest and other financing expenses. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, our Corporate and Other segment had segment net operating losses of ~~$31~~$32 million and ~~$29~~$19 million, respectively. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, our Corporate and Other segment had segment net operating losses of ~~$45~~$77 million and ~~$43~~$62 million, respectively.

The financial information presented herein has been derived from our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In 2006, we began to allocate net investment gains (losses) from our Corporate and Other segment to our Protection (except payment protection insurance) and Retirement Income and Investments segments using an approach based principally upon the investment portfolios established to support each of those segments’ products and targeted capital levels. We do not allocate net investment gains (losses) from our Corporate and Other segment to our Mortgage Insurance segment or to our payment protection insurance business within the Protection segment because they have their own separate investment portfolios, and net investment gains (losses) from those portfolios are reflected in the Mortgage Insurance and Protection segment results, respectively.

Prior to 2006, all net investment gains (losses) were recorded in the Corporate and Other segment and were not reflected in the results of any of our other segments.

We allocate corporate expenses to each of our operating segments based on the amount of capital allocated to that segment.

The accounting policies discussed in this section are those that we consider to be particularly critical to an understanding of our ~~condensed consolidated~~ financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on our ability to judge the effect of inherently uncertain matters on our financial results. These policies relate to valuation of investment securities and impairment of investment securities, deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), present value of future profits (“PVFP”), valuation of goodwill, reserves, unearned premiums, derivatives, and contingent liabilities. For a discussion of each of these policies, please see the discussion entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview—Critical Accounting Policies” contained in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For all of these policies, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and our management’s best estimates may require adjustment.

Valuation of investment securities. We obtain values for actively traded securities from external pricing services. For infrequently traded securities, we obtain quotes from brokers or we estimate values using internally developed pricing models. These models are based upon common valuation techniques and require us to make assumptions regarding credit quality, liquidity and other factors that affect estimated values. We regularly review investment securities for impairment in accordance with our impairment policy, which includes both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Quantitative criteria include length of time and amount that each security position is in an unrealized loss position, and for fixed maturities, whether the issuer is in compliance with terms and covenants of the security. Qualitative criteria include the financial strength and specific prospects for the issuer as well as our intent to hold the security until recovery. Our impairment reviews involve our finance, risk and asset management teams, as well as the portfolio management and research capabilities of GEAM (“GE Asset Management”) and other third-party managers, as required. We actively perform comprehensive market research, monitor market conditions and segment our investments by credit risk in order to minimize impairment risks.

Deferred acquisition costs.Deferred acquisition costs, or DAC, represent costs which vary with and are primarily related to the sale and issuance of our insurance policies and investment contracts that are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the related insurance policies. These costs include commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions, solicitation and printing costs, sales material and some support costs, such as underwriting and contract and policy issuance expenses. DAC is subsequently amortized to expense, over the lives of the underlying contracts, in relation to the anticipated recognition of premiums or gross profits.

The amortization of DAC for traditional long-duration insurance products (including guaranteed renewable term life, life-contingent structured settlements and immediate annuities and long-term care insurance) is determined as a level proportion of premium based on commonly accepted actuarial methods and reasonable assumptions, established when the contract or policy is issued, about mortality, morbidity, lapse rates, expenses, and future yield on related investments. GAAP requires that assumptions for these types of products not be modified (or unlocked) unless recoverability testing deems them to be inadequate or a re-pricing event occurs. Amortization is adjusted each period to reflect policy lapse or termination rates as compared to anticipated experience. Accordingly, we could experience accelerated amortization of DAC if policies terminate earlier than originally assumed.

Amortization of DAC for annuity contracts without significant mortality risk and investment and universal life products is based on expected gross profits. Expected gross profits are adjusted quarterly to reflect actual experience to-date or for the unlocking of underlying key assumptions based on experience studies such as

mortality, withdrawal or lapse rates, investment margin or maintenance expenses. The estimation of expected

gross profits is subject to change given the inherent uncertainty as to the underlying key assumptions employed and the long duration of our policy or contract liabilities. Changes in expected gross profits reflecting the

unlocking of key assumptions could result in a material increase or decrease in the amortization of DAC

depending on the magnitude of the change in underlying assumptions. Significant factors that could result in a material increase or decrease in DAC amortization for these products include material changes in withdrawal or lapse rates, investment spreads or mortality assumptions. For the nine-months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, key assumptions were unlocked in our Protection and Retirement Income and Investments segments to reflect our current expectation of future investment spreads and mortality.

The amortization of DAC for mortgage insurance is based on expected gross margins. Expected gross margins, defined as premiums less losses, are set based on assumptions for future persistency and loss development of the business. These assumptions are updated quarterly for actual experience to-date or as our expectations of future experience are revised based on experience studies. Due to the inherent uncertainties in making assumptions about future events, materially different experience from expected results in persistency or loss development could result in a material increase or decrease to DAC amortization for this business. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, key assumptions were unlocked in our Mortgage Insurance segment to reflect our current expectation of future persistency.

The following table sets forth the increase (decrease) on amortization of DAC related to unlocking of key assumptions by segment for the periods indicated:

In addition, during the second quarter of 2006, we ~~recently~~ completed the acquisition of Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, Tennessee, a provider of Medicare supplement insurance, for approximately

~~$145~~ $145 million. This acquisition enhances our presence in the senior supplemental insurance market by more than doubling our existing annualized premiums for this product and giving us access to approximately 4,200 independent agents.

Payment protection insurance. Growth of our payment protection insurance business is dependent on economic conditions including consumer lending levels, client account penetration and the number of countries and markets we enter. Additionally, the types and mix of our products will vary based on regulatory and consumer acceptance of our products. Our payment protection insurance business continues to show strong growth from increased penetration of existing relationships, and the addition of new distribution relationships in existing and new ~~countries and across our markets.~~countries.

Retirement products.Retirement Income and Investments segment results are affected by investment performance, interest rate levels, slope of the interest rate yield curve, net interest spreads, equity market fluctuations, mortality and the impact of new product sales and lapses. In addition, our competitive position within many of our distribution channels, as well as our ability to retain business, depends significantly upon product features, including current and minimum crediting rates on spread-based products relative to our competitors, surrender charge periods in fixed annuities as well as guaranteed features we offer in variable products. We continually evaluate our competitive position based upon each of those features, and we make adjustments as appropriate to meet our target return thresholds.

The attractiveness of certain fixed annuities has declined as a result of continued low long-term interest rates, a relatively flat yield curve and ~~short term~~short-term investment alternatives, such as certificates of deposit. These trends are having an adverse impact on both sales and retention of fixed ~~annuities.~~annuities with the latter resulting in an acceleration of DAC amortization. In recent quarters, we have experienced improved spreads in fixed annuities primarily due to run-off of and crediting rate resets of historically higher crediting rate business. We expect this trend to continue.

We ~~have focused~~continue to focus on our Income Distribution Series of variable annuity products and riders. We have witnessed a decline in defined benefit retirement plans in favor of defined contribution plans with more of the responsibility for retirement income planning falling on the individual. Additionally, U.S. savings rates are at historical lows. We believe these factors support demand for individual and group retirement income products that provide various forms of guaranteed benefits with the opportunity to realize market performance upside. Our Income Distribution Series provides the contractholder with the ability to receive a guaranteed minimum income stream that they cannot outlive, along with an opportunity to participate in market appreciation. However, through various techniques, these products are designed to reduce some of our risks that generally accompany traditional products with guaranteed living benefits. We are targeting individuals who are focused on building a personal portable retirement plan or are moving from the accumulation to the distribution phase of their retirement planning.

We offer asset management products to individual investors and ~~back office~~ support services for independent ~~broker dealers.~~broker-dealers. The industry is witnessing rapid increases of independent ~~broker dealers~~broker-dealers as registered representatives are leaving large national firms to form their own small firms. These new small firms need client and back office support services and access to technology. Further, individuals are increasingly transferring their money to managed products from mutual funds. We expect these trends to continue and possibly accelerate in the future. As a result of these trends, we are expanding our presence in this market and have ~~announced~~completed the acquisition of AssetMark Investment Services, Inc., a leading provider of open architecture asset management solutions to independent financial advisors, with more than $8$9 billion in assets under management. Our products consist of separately managed accounts and managed mutual fund accounts. We receive a management fee based upon the amount of assets under management. The results of our asset management business are a function of net flows and investment performance of assets under management, which are influenced by the relative performance of our product’s underlying investments and the overall equity market environment.

Mortgage insurance.The results of our Mortgage Insurance segment are affected by employment and other economic and housing markets trends, including ~~mortgage origination volume,~~ interest rate trends, home price appreciation, mortgage origination volume and levels of mortgage delinquencies (including seasonal effects). In addition, movements in foreign currency exchange rates affect our international mortgage insurance results.

We believe the U.S., economy overall remains relatively strong based on continued gross domestic product growth and low levels of unemployment. However, we believe that the U.S. housing market is slowing. In particular, certain areas of the Great Lakes region have experienced an economic slowdown and have seen a more pronounced weakness in their housing market as well as a decline in home prices. While our portfolio concentration in the impacted areas is limited to less than 10% of our total risk in-force, these areas of weakness may cause our U.S. losses and loss ratio to increase.

The recent rise in interest rates and lower home price appreciation in the U.S. have contributed to rising persistency rates. Our U.S. flow persistency was 72% and 64% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. We believe that sustained higher interest rates and increased persistency will lead to stable to growing levels of insurance in-force. Primary insurance in-force increased from $102 billion as of June 30, 2006 to $104 billion as of September 30, 2006. This increase in primary insurance-in-force reflected the second sequential quarter increase in flow insurance in-force after nearly five years of decline.

The demand for flow private mortgage insurance declined in the ~~first quarter of~~six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005, according to data published byInside Mortgage Finance.We believe this was driven principally by the significant use of simultaneous second mortgages as an alternative to private mortgage insurance, the origination of mortgages that did not meet the eligibility requirements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and mortgages that were securitized in mortgage-backed securities that did not use private mortgage insurance.

~~In the U.S., the~~The bulk mortgage insurance market is increasing as a percentage of the overall primary mortgage insurance market, which we believe is driven in part, by an increase in non-prime mortgage-backed security issuances. We have increased our participation in selected segments of the bulk market and continue to evaluate additional opportunities this market presents.

The recent rise in interest rates and lower home price appreciation in the U.S. have contributed to rising persistency rates. Our U.S. flow persistency was 72% and 65% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. We believe that sustained higher interest rates and increased persistency will lead to stable to growing levels of insurance in-force. Primary insurance in-force increased from $100 billion as of March 31, 2006 to $102 billion as of June 30, 2006. This increase in primary insurance-in-force reflected a sequential increase in flow insurance in-force for the first time in nearly five years.

Our international mortgage insurance business has continued to expand with favorable operating results. We expect that the growth of our established international mortgage insurance business and our entry into new international markets will continue to contribute an increasing portion of this segment’s total revenues and profits.

The Canadian government expanded its authority to guarantee mortgage insurance to cover any approved mortgage insurer in addition to us. The overall cap on guaranteed policies was also increased to CDN $200 billion and the government was given latitude to change the cap without further legislation. These changes facilitate our ongoing ability to offer mortgage insurance products under the guarantee but may also enable potential new competitors to do the same.

As a result of the significant U.S. refinancing activity since 2002 and the expansion of our international business in recent years, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, approximately ~~66%~~63% of our U.S. risk in-force and ~~67%~~61% of our international risk in-force have not yet reached its anticipated highest claim frequency years, which are generally between the third and seventh year of the loan. We expect our loss experience on these loans will increase as these books of business continue to mature.

In the second quarter of 2006, the Canadian government expanded its authority to guarantee mortgage insurance to cover any approved mortgage insurer in addition to us and can now do this without further legislation. The overall cap on guaranteed policies was also increased to CDN $200 billion. These changes facilitate our ongoing ability to offer mortgage insurance products under the guarantee but may also enable potential new competitors to do the same.

See “—Results of Operations by Segment” and selected operating performance measures contained herein for additional discussion of business trends and conditions.

“Net operating ~~earnings”~~income” is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as net ~~earnings,~~income, excluding after-tax net investment gains (losses) (which can fluctuate significantly from period to period), and other adjustments, changes in accounting principles and infrequent or unusual non-operating items. There were no non-recurring, infrequent or unusual items excluded from net operating ~~earnings~~income in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005.

Management believes that analysis of “net operating ~~earnings”~~income” enhances understanding and comparability of performance by highlighting underlying business activity and profitability drivers. However, “net operating ~~earnings”~~income” should not be viewed as a substitute for net ~~earnings~~income in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our definition of “net operating ~~earnings”~~income” may differ from the definitions used by other companies.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table provides a reconciliation of net ~~earnings~~income to “net operating ~~earnings”~~income” (as defined above) for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:

payment protection business as a result of a decrease in the U.K. ~~market~~run-off block. Premiums in our Mortgage Insurance segment increased $44 million reflecting growth and ~~changes in foreign exchange rates.~~seasoning of our of our international mortgage insurance in-force block. Our Retirement Income and Investments segment ~~decreased $41~~increased $21 million attributable to ~~a reduction in~~higher sales of our life-contingent single premium immediate annuities, partially offset by a reduction in our life-contingent structured settlement annuities.

Net investment income.Net investment income increased primarily as a result of an increase in average invested assets in our Protection and Retirement Income and Investments segments. The increase in our Protection segment was attributable to growth of our long-term care in-force block and an increase related to assets purchased using proceeds from our issuance of non-recourse funding obligations supporting certain term life insurance ~~policies, growth of~~policies. The increase in our ~~long-term care in-force block~~Retirement Income and Investments segment was largely driven by new production in institutional products. ~~The increase in net investment income was~~Our Mortgage segment also increased due to ~~an increase~~growth in ~~weighted~~assets in the mortgage international business. Weighted average investment yields ~~to 5.8%~~were 5.7% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 ~~from 5.4%~~and 2005. Higher yields on floating rate investments for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2005. The increase in weighted average~~2006 were offset primarily by lower investment ~~yields was primarily attributable to increased yields on floating rate~~income from bond calls, commercial mortgage loan prepayments and limited partnership investments. Net investment income for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 included ~~$35~~$13 million of investment income from ~~a reduction in commercial mortgage loan loss reserves,~~ bond calls, commercial mortgage loan prepayments and limited partnership investments as compared to $9$40 million in investment income from bond calls, mortgage loan prepayments and limited partnership investments in the prior year.

Net investment gains (losses). For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, gross investment gains were $8$14 million and gross investment (losses) were ~~$57~~($20) million, including $4($1) million of impairments. Gross investment gains for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 were primarily attributable to $8$11 million in gains on the sale of available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity securities. Gross investment losses include ~~$50~~$19 million of interest rate related losses as a result of the disposition of available-for-sale securities primarily from portfolio repositioning activities, a $4 million impairment charge related to an equity security and $2 million in connection with terminations and losses in fair value of non-qualified derivatives. Net investment losses on trading securities were $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.activities. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005, gross investment gains on available-for-sale securities were ~~$12~~$35 million and gross investment ~~losses~~(losses) on available-for-sale securities were ~~$12~~($42) million, including $3($32) million of impairments. The available-for-sale securities impairments related primarily to fixed maturity securities issued by companies in the ~~consumer products~~finance and insurance, retail, timber and transportation industries ($110 million, $9 million, $5 million and $1$4 million, respectively).

Policy fees and other income. Policy fees and other income consist primarily of cost of insurance and surrender charges assessed on universal life insurance policies, fees assessed against policyholder and contractholder account values, and commission income. ~~The increase in policy~~Policy fees and other income ~~was primarily due to higher~~remained flat for the period. Higher sales and growth in assets under management in Retirement Income and Investments’ fee-based products ofresulted in a $22 million increase in policy fees and other income. This was offset by a $20 million reduction in our life business as a result of ~~distribution expansion, favorable equity markets,~~unfavorable unearned revenue adjustments and ~~continued product enhancements. In addition,~~a $4 million reduction in our ~~life~~mortgage insurance business ~~increased $21 million primarily as a result~~largely driven by the recent elimination of ~~the growth of our universal life insurance in-force block.~~Canadian application fees.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves. Benefits and other changes in policy reserves consist primarily of benefits paid and reserve activity related to current claims and future policy benefits on insurance and investment products for life, long-term care, Medicare supplement, group life and health, payment protection, structured settlements and single premium immediate annuities with life contingencies and claim costs incurred related to mortgage insurance products. The increase in benefits and other changes in policy reserves was primarily driven by a ~~$64~~$79 million increase in our long-term care business as a result of higher incurred claims ~~associated with the~~driven by aging ofand growth in the in-force block, ~~higher than expected loss experience in the current quarter,~~continued low termination rates on older issued policies as well as the Continental Life acquisition. Adding to this increase was ~~an $11~~a $40 million increase in our Mortgage Insurance segment

primarily driven by higher losses ~~in Australia~~ from portfolio seasoning ~~and~~in our international mortgage insurance business, increased ~~delinquencies~~losses from a limited number of Australian distribution ~~relationships. This~~relationships and $9 million of favorable adjustments in the prior year that did not recur. Additionally, our U.S. mortgage insurance business increased attributable to higher losses associated with a smaller decline in our average reserve per delinquency than in the prior year. Our Retirement Income and Investments segment also increased as a

result of higher sales of life-contingent single premium immediate annuities, which was partially offset by a decrease in ~~our Retirement Income and Investments segment~~sales of ~~$34 million attributable to the decline in~~ life-contingent structured settlement ~~annuity sales.~~annuities.

Interest credited. Interest credited represents interest credited on behalf of policyholder and contractholder general account balances. The increase in interest credited from our Retirement Income and Investments segment was primarily due to a ~~$37~~$28 million increase related to spread-based institutional products as a result of ~~increased~~higher crediting rates on floating rate products and higher assets under management. This increase was partially offset by ~~an $11~~a $16 million decrease in interest credited ~~on fixed annuities~~related to spread-based retail products, primarily due to fixed annuities crediting rates being reset to current, lower rates as the fixed annuities reach the end of their initial crediting rate guarantee period. In addition, interest credited increased $7 million from universal life products in our Protection segment primarily from higher crediting rates and higher account values.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, represent costs and expenses related to the acquisition and ongoing maintenance of insurance and investment contracts, including commissions, policy issuance expenses and other underwriting and general operating costs. These costs and expenses are net of amounts that are capitalized and deferred, which are primarily costs and expenses that vary with and are primarily related to the sale and issuance of our insurance policies and investment contracts, such as first-year commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions and other policy issuance expenses. AnAcquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, increased primarily from an $11 million increase in our ~~fee-based products~~payment protection business as a result of growth in continental Europe and Ireland and changes in foreign exchange rates, which was partially offset by a decrease associated with our U.K. run-off block. In addition, our long-term care business increased $7 million primarily from the Continental acquisition. Also, our Retirement Income and ~~Investments segment of $16~~Investments’ fee-based products increased $13 million associated with higher sales and growth in assets under ~~management in fee-based products was offset by a $15 million decrease in our Corporate and Other segment that was attributable to lower unallocated overhead expenses in 2006 compared to 2005.~~management.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles. Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles consists primarily of the amortization of acquisition costs that are capitalized, PVFP and ~~PVFP. The~~capitalized software. Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles decreased as a result of a $57 million decrease in our Protection segment primarily attributable to a $32 million decrease from our life insurance business, as further described in the Protection segment results, a $28 million decrease from our payment protection insurance business, partially offset by a $4 million increase in our long-term care business. The decrease in our payment protection insurance business was largely driven by the continued decline of ~~$8 million~~our run-off block within the U.K. and was partially offset by an $8increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. These decreases were offset by an $11 million increase in our Retirement Income and Investments segment primarily from our spread-based retail ~~products. This increase~~products due to continued lapses in our ~~Retirement Income and Investments segment was partially offset by an $11 million reduction in amortization expense attributable to investment losses on our investment contracts.~~fixed annuities.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased primarily as a result of the ~~issuance~~issuances of additional non-recourse funding obligations ~~in the first quarter of 2006 and the second and third quarters of 2005,~~ and an increase in average variable rates paid on ~~non-recourse funding obligations supporting our term life insurance capital management strategy.~~those obligations. This was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense associated with the ~~first quarter 2006~~ derecognition of borrowings related to securitization ~~entities.~~entities in the first quarter of 2006.

Provision for income taxes.The effective tax rate increased to ~~31.7%~~32.1% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~30.8%~~30.7% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. The increase in effective tax rate was primarily attributable to nonrecurring favorable examination developments in 2005, offset in part by the increase in lower taxed foreign earnings in 2006.

Net operating ~~earnings.~~income. The ~~increase~~decrease in net operating ~~earnings~~income reflects ~~increases~~decreases in ~~segment net operating earnings in our Protection and Mortgage Insurance segments, offset by~~ our Retirement Income and Investments and Corporate and Other segments ~~which experienced small decreases,~~segment net operating income, offset by increases in our Protection and Mortgage Insurance segments net operating income, as discussed in the “—Results of Operations by Segment.” Included in net operating income is a $6 million, net of tax, increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table provides a reconciliation of net ~~earnings~~income to “net operating ~~earnings”~~income” (as defined above) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005.


	Six months ended June 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Nine months ended September 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)	2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	3,187		$	3,219		$	(32	)	(1	)%	$	4,867		$	4,766		$	101		2	%
Net investment income		1,877			1,693			184		11	%		2,821			2,595			226		9	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(71	)		(6	)		(65	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(77	)		(13	)		(64	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		386			315			71		23	%		572			501			71		14	%

Total revenues		5,379			5,221			158		3	%		8,183			7,849			334		4	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		2,131			2,126			5		—	%		3,314			3,152			162		5	%
Interest credited		751			687			64		9	%		1,134			1,051			83		8	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		996			970			26		3	%		1,529			1,476			53		4	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		381			401			(20	)	(5	)%		551			618			(67	)	(11	)%
Interest expense		170			141			29		21	%		257			213			44		21	%

Total benefits and expenses		4,429			4,325			104		2	%		6,785			6,510			275		4	%

Net earnings before income taxes and accounting change		950			896			54		6	%
Income before income taxes and accounting change													1,398			1,339			59		4	%
Provision for income taxes		303			289			14		5	%		447			425			22		5	%

Net earnings before accounting change		647			607			40		7	%
Net income before accounting change													951			914			37		4	%
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes		4			—			4		NM	⁽¹⁾		4			—			4		NM	⁽¹⁾

Net earnings		651			607			44		7	%

Adjustments to net earnings:
Net investment losses (gains), net of taxes and other adjustments		37			4			33		NM	⁽¹⁾
Net income													955			914			41		4	%
Adjustments to net income:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments													40			8			32		NM	⁽¹⁾
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes		(4	)		—			(4	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(4	)		—			(4	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Net operating earnings	$	684		$	611		$	73		12	%

Net operating income												$	991		$	922		$	69		7	%

Net earnings per common share:
Basic	$	1.41		$	1.27

Diluted	$	1.37		$	1.25

Net earnings before accounting change per common share:
Basic	$	1.40		$	1.27							$	2.08		$	1.92

Diluted	$	1.37		$	1.25							$	2.02		$	1.88

Net operating earnings per common share:
Basic	$	1.48		$	1.27							$	2.16		$	1.93

Diluted	$	1.44		$	1.26							$	2.10		$	1.90

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		461.3			479.6								458.8			476.7

Diluted		473.9			485.9								471.7			484.7

Premiums. The ~~decrease~~increase in premiums is primarily driven by ~~a $105~~an increase of $66 million ~~decrease~~ in our ~~Retirement Income~~Protection segment primarily driven by a $117 million increase in our long-term care business mainly from growth in the in-force block and ~~Investments~~$70 million from the Continental Life acquisition. Additionally, our Protection segment increased $88 million primarily from ~~a reduction~~growth in ~~sales~~the in-force blocks of our ~~life-contingent structured settlement annuities.~~term life insurance and group insurance businesses. Our payment protection business decreased $139 million driven by the run-off block within the U.K. and changes in foreign exchange rates. Partially offsetting ~~this is a $79 million increase~~these decreases in our payment protection business

was premium growth in continental Europe and Ireland. Premiums in our Mortgage Insurance segment ~~reflecting~~increased $123 million largely driven by growth and ~~aging~~seasoning of our international mortgage insurance in-force block. ~~Premiums for~~The decrease in Retirement Income and Investments premiums was primarily the ~~Protection segment were unchanged compared to the prior year. Our payment protection business decreased by $106 million as a~~ result of a ~~decrease in the U.K. market and changes in foreign exchange rates. Offsetting the decrease in the payment protection business was increases~~$141 million reduction in our ~~life, long-term care and group life and health businesses. The life business increased $53~~life-contingent structured settlement annuities, which was partially offset by a $59 million ~~primarily due to growth~~increase from higher sales of our term life insurance in-force block. The long-term care business increased $44 million associated with growth in the in-force block and $27 million in our long-term care business from the Continental Life acquisition.life-contingent single premium immediate annuities.

Net investment income.Net investment income increased primarily as a result of an increase in average invested assets in our Protection segment attributable to growth of our long-term care in-force block and an increase related to assets purchased using proceeds from our issuance of non-recourse funding obligations supporting certain term life insurance ~~policies~~policies. Additionally, our Retirement Income and Investments segment was principally due to increased yields on floating rate investments and higher assets under management. Our Mortgage insurance segment also increased due to an increase in assets associated with the growth of our ~~long-term care in-force block.~~international mortgage business. The increase in net investment income was also due to an increase in weighted average investment yields to 5.7% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~5.4%~~5.5% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. The increase in weighted average investment yields was primarily attributable to increased yields on floating rate ~~investments.Net~~investments. Net investment income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 included ~~$54~~$67 million of investment income related to a reduction in bond calls, commercial mortgage loan prepayments, limited partnership investments and the release of commercial mortgage loan loss reserves ~~bond calls, mortgage loan prepayments and limited partnership investments~~ as compared to ~~$29~~$69 million ~~in investment income from bond calls, mortgage loan prepayments and limited partnership investments~~ in the prior year.

Net investment gains (losses). For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, gross investment gains were ~~$30~~$42 million and gross investment ~~losses~~(losses) were ~~$101~~($119) million, including $5($6) million of impairments. These impairments were attributable to available-for-sale equity securities, fixed maturities and limited partnership investments ($4 million, $1 million and $1 million, respectively). Gross investment gains for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 were associated with ~~$30~~$41 million in gains on the sale of available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity securities. Gross investment losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 include ~~$76~~$95 million of interest rate related losses as a result of the disposition of available-for-sale securities primarily from portfolio repositioning activities, $17 million on the derecognition of assets and liabilities associated with certain securitization entities, $5and $6 million of impairment ~~charges, and $2 million in connection with terminations and losses in fair value of non-qualified derivatives. Net investment losses on trading securities were $1 million for~~charges. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June 30, 2006. For the six months ended June~~September 30, 2005, gross investment gains were ~~$51~~$86 million and gross investment ~~losses~~(losses) were ~~$57~~($99) million, including ~~$37~~($68) million of impairments. These impairments were attributable to available-for-sale fixed maturities, equity investments and limited partnership investments ~~and equity investments~~ ($3162 million, $5 million and $1 million, respectively). The fixed maturities impairments related primarily to securities issued by companies in the automotive, transportation finance and ~~consumer products~~insurance and retail industries ($1417 million, ~~$12~~$16 million, $10 million and $3$9 million, respectively).

Policy fees and other income. The increase in policy fees and other income was primarily due to a $58 million increase in Retirement Income and Investments’ fee-based products driven by higher sales and growth in assets under ~~management in Retirement Income and Investments’ fee-based products of $36 million as a result of distribution expansion, favorable equity markets, and continued product enhancements.~~management. In addition, our ~~life insurance business~~Protection segment increased ~~$26~~$13 million primarily ~~as a result of the~~due to growth of our universal life insurance in-force ~~block.~~block in our life insurance business and a reclassification from premiums and interest credited in our long-term care business.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves. The increase in benefits and other changes in policy reserves was primarily driven by a ~~$70~~$152 million increase in our Protection segment ~~resulting~~principally from ~~claims associated with the aging of the~~our long-term care insurance business as a result of higher incurred claims driven by aging and growth in the in-force block, expiring reinsurance coverage, continued low termination rates on older issued policies and the Continental Life acquisition. Adding to this increase was a ~~$36~~$76 million increase in our Mortgage Insurance segment largely driven by higher losses in Australia from portfolio seasoning and increased ~~delinquencies~~losses from a limited number of distribution relationships. ~~This~~Additionally, our U.S. mortgage insurance business increased attributable to an increase ~~was nearly~~in our average reserve per delinquency. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our Retirement Income and Investments segment of ~~$101~~$64 million primarily attributable to the decline in life-contingent structured settlement annuity sales.

Interest credited. The increase in interest credited was primarily due to a ~~$69~~$97 million increase related to spread-based institutional products as a result of increased crediting rates on floating rate products and higher

assets under management, ~~and a $10 million increase in our Protection segment. This increase was~~ partially offset by a ~~$17~~$33 million decrease ~~in interest credited on~~largely from fixed annuities ~~primarily due to~~in our spread-based retail products associated with crediting rates being reset to current, lower rates as the fixed annuities reach their initial crediting rate guarantee period. Our Protection segment also experienced a $17 million increase principally from $13 million in our long-term care business driven by growth in the cash surrender value of our corporate owned life insurance block of business and reclassification from policy fees and other income in the prior year.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, increased primarily due ~~a $27~~to higher expenses of $37 million ~~increase~~ in our Retirement Income and Investments segment ~~associated with~~largely from higher sales and growth in assets under management in fee-based products, partially offset by $6 million of lower expenses associated with our spread-based retail products. Additionally, our long-term care business increased $43 million largely due to growth from the in-force-block and a $10 million increase in our Mortgage Insurance segment primarily as a result of an increase in costs in our existing international platforms and continued investment in potential new international mortgage insurance platforms. This wasthe Continental acquisition. These increases were partially offset by a $9$30 million decrease in our ~~Corporate~~payment protection insurance business primarily driven by our run-off block within the U.K. and ~~Other segment that was principally from lower unallocated overhead expenses~~changes in ~~2006 compared to 2005.~~foreign exchange rates.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles. Amortization of deferred acquisition cost and intangibles decreased primarily due to a ~~$38~~$95 million decrease in our Protection segment ~~from~~largely driven by our payment protection insurance business run-off block ~~and changes in foreign exchange rates, as well as a~~within the U.K. This decrease ~~in our long-term care business related to a correction related to a long-term care policy rider in the prior year. This~~ was partially offset by ~~an increase in our Retirement Income and Investments of $17~~a $30 million ~~associated with higher lapses and growth in spreads on spread-based retail products. Partially offsetting this~~ increase in our Retirement Income and Investments segment ~~was an $11 million reduction~~from higher lapses and more favorable gross profit margins in ~~amortization expense attributable to investment losses.~~spread-based retail products.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased primarily as a result of the ~~issuance~~issuances of additional non-recourse funding obligations ~~in the first quarter of 2006 and the second and third quarters of 2005,~~ and an increase in average variable rates paid on ~~non-recourse funding obligations supporting our term life insurance capital management strategy.~~those obligations. This was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense associated with the first quarter 2006 derecognition of borrowings related to securitization entities.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate ~~decreased~~increased to ~~31.9%~~32.0% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~32.3%~~31.7% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. The ~~decrease~~increase in effective tax rate was primarily attributable to nonrecurring favorable examination developments in 2005, offset in part by the increase in lower taxed foreign earnings in ~~2006, offset in part by nonrecurring favorable examination developments in 2005.~~2006.

Net operating ~~earnings.~~income. The increase in net operating ~~earnings~~income reflects increases in segment net operating ~~earnings~~income in our Protection and Mortgage Insurance segments, offset by decreases in our Retirement Income and Investments and Corporate and Other segments, as discussed in the “—Results of Operations by Segment.” Included in net operating income is a $6 million, net of tax, increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Management regularly reviews the performance of each of our operating segments (Protection, Retirement Income and Investments and Mortgage Insurance) based on after-tax segment net operating ~~earnings~~income (loss), which excludes: (1) cumulative effect of accounting changes, and (2) infrequent or unusual non-operating items. Certain other items, including most of our interest and other financing expenses and advertising, marketing and other corporate expenses, are included in our Corporate and Other segment. Although these excluded items are significant to our consolidated financial performance, we believe that the presentation of segment net operating ~~earnings~~income (loss) enhances our understanding and assessment of the results of operations of our operating segments by highlighting net ~~earnings~~income (loss) attributable to the normal, recurring operations of our business. However, segment net operating ~~earnings~~income (loss) is not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP.

We offer U.S. customers life insurance, long-term care insurance, linked benefits products, Medicare supplement insurance and, primarily for companies with fewer than 1,000 employees, group life and health insurance. In Europe, we offer payment protection insurance in 18 countries, which helps consumers meet their

payment obligations in the event of illness, involuntary unemployment, disability or death. Effective January 1, 2006, Seguros, a small Mexican-domiciled multi-line insurer, previously included in our Corporate and Other segment, is now being managed within our Protection segment and whose results are now included as part of the payment protection insurance business.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Protection segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended September 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1,174		$	1,141	$	33		3	%	$	1,199		$	1,133	$	66		6	%
Net investment income		364			312		52		17	%		363			321		42		13	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(2	)		—		(2	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		2			—		2		NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		103			78		25		32	%		90			110		(20	)	(18	)%

Total revenues		1,639			1,531		108		7	%		1,654			1,564		90		6	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		778			710		68		10	%		822			740		82		11	%
Interest credited		96			91		5		5	%		97			90		7		8	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		350			352		(2	)	(1	)%		356			332		24		7	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		153			161		(8	)	(5	)%		106			163		(57	)	(35	)%
Interest expense		34			11		23		NM	⁽¹⁾		34			13		21		162	%

Total benefits and expenses		1,411			1,325		86		6	%		1,415			1,338		77		6	%

Earnings before income taxes		228			206		22		11	%
Income before income taxes												239			226		13		6	%
Provision for income taxes		79			73		6		8	%		85			81		4		5	%

Segment net earnings		149			133		16		12	%
Adjustments to segment net earnings:
Net investment losses (gains) net of taxes and other adjustments		2			—		2		NM	⁽¹⁾
Segment net income												154			145		9		6	%
Adjustments to segment net income:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments												(2	)		—		(2	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net operating earnings	$	151		$	133	$	18		14	%
Segment net operating income											$	152		$	145	$	7		5	%

The following table sets forth net operating ~~earnings~~income for the products included in our Protection segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Segment net operating earnings:
Protection segment net operating income:
Life insurance	$	77	$	55	$	22		40	%	$	79	$	73	$	6		8	%
Long-term care insurance		37		46		(9	)	(20	)%		38		41		(3	)	(7	)%
Payment protection insurance		29		24		5		21	%		26		23		3		13	%
Group life and health insurance		8		8		—		—	%		9		8		1		13	%

Total segment net operating earnings	$	151	$	133	$	18		14	%
Total segment net operating income										$	152	$	145	$	7		5	%

~~The increase~~Segment net operating income in our life insurance business ~~was~~increased primarily ~~related~~due to growth ~~of the term life in-force blocks and favorable mortality. In addition, earnings~~ in ~~the prior year were reduced by unfavorable mortality and an $8 million unfavorable adjustment on a reinsured block of~~ term life insurance ~~policies.~~in-force and continued favorable mortality experience. The increase in our payment protection insurance business was ~~due to~~primarily associated with growth in continental Europe and Ireland ~~and $3 million attributable to a lower effective tax rate,~~in-force, partially offset by $2lower U.K. income and included a $1 million ~~from unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rate,~~increase, net of ~~tax. Our long-term care business declined primarily from higher incurred claims, declining~~

~~investment yields, and lower termination rates on older issued policies, some with expiring reinsurance coverage. The current year benefited from a $15 million favorable reserve adjustment, net of~~ tax, related to group long-term care policies, offset by $9 million of unfavorable reinsurance adjustments, net of tax. The prior year benefited from a $4 million, net of tax, of favorable experience on a reinsured block and $4 million of net reserve adjustments, net of tax.

Premiums increased as a result of a $33 million increase in our life insurance business primarily related to growth of the term life insurance in-force blocks, a $27 million increase in our long-term care business due to $27 million from the Continental Life acquisition and an increase attributable to in-force growth. Partially offsetting the long-term care business increase is the absence of a prior year favorable $8 million correction of premiums associated with a long-term care policy rider and a $6 million favorable experience on a reinsured block in the prior year. The increases were partially offset by a decrease of $30 million in our payment protection insurance business which included a decrease of $16 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. ~~This~~The decrease in our long-term care insurance business was principally the result of higher incurred claims and lower investment yield as net insurance cash flows continue to be invested at new money rates lower than our portfolio yield.

Premiums increased $66 million driven by $73 million in our long-term care business, $16 million in our life business and $10 million in our group business, offset by a decrease of $33 million in our payment protection business. The increase in our long-term care insurance business was attributable to growth in long-term care insurance in-force and included a $43 million increase from the Continental acquisition. The increase in our life insurance business was mainly due to ~~a $56 million decrease~~growth in the ~~U.K. market,~~in-force block of term life insurance. The increase in our group insurance business was principally from growth in our non-medical products, partially offset by ~~an increase in continental Europe~~lower premiums from our medical and ~~Ireland.~~individual voluntary products. Our payment protection insurance business decrease is largely driven by $71 million from the U.K. market. The decrease infrom the U.K. market was ~~attributable to~~the result of the continued run-off of low return blocks of business and the exit from the travel insurance business. Partially offsetting the decrease from the U.K. market was growth in continental Europe and Ireland and an $11 million increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The increase in continental Europe and Ireland relates to growth from new distribution relationships and an increase in consumer lending in those markets.

The increase in net investment income ~~which includes a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates,~~ was primarily the result of growth of our long-term care in-force block, an increase in ~~average invested assets and average variable rate yields, associated with~~ assets purchased using proceeds from our issuance of non-recourse funding obligations supporting certain term life insurance policies, and a $1 million increase attributable to ~~new assets backing growth of~~changes in foreign exchange rates in our ~~long-term care~~payment protection insurance business.

For a discussion of net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

~~The increase in policy~~Policy fees and other income ~~is primarily due to an increase of $21~~decreased $20 million inprincipally driven by our life insurance ~~business largely due to growth of the~~business. The decrease was primarily in our universal life insurance ~~in-force block~~products and resulted from an unfavorable $13 million adjustment in unearned revenue in the current year and a ~~$12~~$9 million ~~unfavorable~~favorable adjustment to unearned revenue on a ~~reinsured~~closed block of ~~term life insurance policies~~non-standard business in the prior year.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased ~~due~~$82 million attributable to a ~~$64~~$79 million increase in our long-term care business, a $6$15 million increase in our life insurance business and a $5$7 million increase in our group business, partially offset by a $7decrease of $19 million ~~decrease~~ in our payment protection ~~insurance~~ business. The increase in our long-term care insurance business was ~~primarily~~ the result of higher incurred claims driven by the aging and growth ofin the in-force block ~~higher than normal claims in the current period, lower~~and continued low termination rates on older issued policies, ~~some with expiring reinsurance coverage,~~ and a ~~$17~~$35 million increase from the Continental ~~Life~~ acquisition. Both years benefited from reserve adjustments of similar amounts. The current year includes a $24 million decrease associated with an adjustment related to group long-term care policies. The prior year included $25 million of favorable reserve adjustments for a correction of a long-term care policy rider and strengthening of certain claim reserves. The increase in our life insurance business ~~is principally~~was due to growth of ~~the~~our term and universal life in-force ~~blocks partially offset by favorable mortality.~~block. The increase in our group insurance business was principally driven by ~~a combination~~growth of ~~growth~~the in-force and ~~fluctuations~~higher claims in ~~claims that are within our expectations.~~the non-medical insurance products. The decrease in our payment protection insurance business was ~~largely the result of a reduction of~~primarily related to lower claims in our run-off block of ~~travel insurance and also includes a $2~~business within the U.K. which was partially offset by an $1 million ~~decrease~~increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals ~~decreased primarily due to a $27~~increased $24 million ~~decrease in~~driven by $11 million from our payment protection insurance business, ~~primarily associated with~~$8 million from our ~~run-off block~~long-term care insurance business, $3 million from our life insurance business and ~~also includes a decrease~~$2 million from our group insurance business. The increase in our payment

protection business was principally related to growth of $9in-force production in continental Europe and Ireland and an $8 million increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange ~~rates,~~rates. These increases were partially offset by a ~~$19 million~~decrease in expenses resulting from lower production associated with the U.K. run-off block. The increase in our long-term care insurance business ~~primarily from growth~~was largely the result of ~~our in-force business, a $5~~$7 million ~~increase~~of expenses from the

Continental Life acquisition, an $8 million unfavorable reinsurance adjustment, and a $7 million increase in our life insurance business due to prior year expense favorability that did not recur in the current year.acquisition.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles decreased $57 million primarily ~~due~~attributable to $32 million from our life insurance business, $28 million from our payment protection insurance business, partially offset by a ~~$17~~$4 million ~~decrease~~increase in our long-term care business attributable to unfavorable prior year amortization of $27 million related to the correction of a long-term care policy rider. This decrease is partially offset by growth of the in-force block and higher terminations in our Medicare supplement product.insurance business. The decrease in our ~~long-term care~~payment protection insurance business was largely driven by our run-off block and was partially offset by a ~~$12~~$2 million increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Current year amortization in our life business included decreases in our universal life insurance ~~business~~products of $7 million due to ~~growth of the term life~~an unearned revenue adjustment and $7 million associated with revisions to estimated gross profit assumptions. Prior year amortization also included a $10 million unfavorable adjustment in our universal life ~~in-force blocks.~~amortization.

Interest expense increased ~~$23~~$21 million ~~as the result of~~from the issuance of additional non-recourse funding obligations ~~in the first quarter of 2006 and the second and third quarters of 2005,~~ and an increase in average variable rates paid ~~on non-recourse funding obligations supporting our term life insurance capital management strategy.~~those obligations.

The effective tax rate decreased to ~~34.6%~~35.6% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~35.4%~~35.8% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. The decrease in effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the increase in lower taxed foreign earnings and a reduction in excess foreign tax credits, ~~partially~~ offset by nonrecurring favorable examination developments in 2005.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Protection segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Six months ended June 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Nine months ended September 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	2,279		$	2,279	$	—		—	%	$	3,478		$	3,412	$	66		2	%
Net investment income		710			627		83		13	%		1,073			948		125		13	%
Net investment gains (losses)		2			—		2		NM	⁽¹⁾		4			—		4		NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		200			167		33		20	%		290			277		13		5	%

Total revenues		3,191			3,073		118		4	%		4,845			4,637		208		4	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1,525			1,455		70		5	%		2,347			2,195		152		7	%
Interest credited		191			181		10		6	%		288			271		17		6	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		680			682		(2	)	—	%		1,036			1,014		22		2	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		275			313		(38	)	(12	)%		381			476		(95	)	(20	)%
Interest expense		59			20		39		195	%		93			33		60		182	%

Total benefits and expenses		2,730			2,651		79		3	%		4,145			3,989		156		4	%

Earnings before income taxes		461			422		39		9	%
Income before income taxes												700			648		52		8	%
Provision for income taxes		160			150		10		7	%		245			231		14		6	%

Segment net earnings		301			272		29		11	%
Adjustments to segment net earnings:
Net investment losses (gains) net of taxes and other adjustments		(1	)		—		(1	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Segment net income												455			417		38		9	%
Adjustments to segment net income:
Net investment (gains) losses net of taxes and other adjustments												(3	)		—		(3	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net operating earnings	$	300		$	272	$	28		10	%
Segment net operating income											$	452		$	417	$	35		8	%

The following table sets forth net operating ~~earnings~~income for the products included in our Protection segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Six months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Nine months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Segment net operating earnings:
Segment net operating income:
Life insurance	$	151	$	123	$	28		23	%	$	230	$	196	$	34		17	%
Long-term care insurance		80		88		(8	)	(9	)%		118		129		(11	)	(9	)%
Payment protection insurance		54		46		8		17	%		80		69		11		16	%
Group life and health insurance		15		15		—		—	%		24		23		1		4	%

Total segment net operating earnings	$	300	$	272	$	28		10	%
Total segment net operating income										$	452	$	417	$	35		8	%

~~The increase~~Segment net operating income in our life insurance business ~~was~~increased primarily ~~related~~due to in-force growth ~~of the term life in-force blocks and favorable mortality. In addition, earnings~~ in ~~the prior year were reduced by unfavorable mortality and $8 million related to an unfavorable adjustment on a reinsured block of~~ term life insurance ~~policies.~~and continued favorable mortality. The increase in our payment protection insurance business net operating earnings was ~~due to~~primarily associated with growth in continental Europe and Ireland ~~and $6 million attributable to a lower effective tax rate,~~production, partially offset by $4lower income in the U.K. and included a $3 million ~~unfavorable~~decrease, net of tax, attributable to changes in foreign exchange ~~rates, net of tax.~~rates. The decrease in our long-term care insurance business ~~is largely~~was principally the result of higher incurred claims and lower ~~terminations on~~investment yields as net insurance cash flows continue to be invested at new money rates lower than our ~~older issued policies, some with expiring reinsurance coverage, and a continued low interest rate environment. The~~portfolio yield.

Our current year long-term care business segment net operating income benefited from a $17 million, ~~reserve adjustment,~~ net of tax, ~~related to group long-term care policies,~~reserve adjustments, partially offset by $9$7 million, net of tax, of reinsurance ~~adjustments, net of tax. Our long-term care business benefited in the~~adjustments. The prior year benefited from a $7 million, net of tax, favorable experience on a reinsured ~~block partially offset~~block. Prior year net operating income in our life insurance business was reduced by $1an $8 million ~~of net reserve adjustments,~~unfavorable adjustment, net of ~~tax.~~tax, on reinsured term life insurance policies.

Premiums ~~from~~increased $66 million driven by $117 million in our long-term care insurance business, $69 million in our life ~~insurance~~ business ~~increased $53 million reflecting growth of the term life insurance in-force blocks. Our long-term care business increased $44 million primarily associated with in-force growth~~ and ~~$27 million from the Continental Life acquisition. The prior year included~~ $19 million ~~of favorable items for the long-term care business that did not recur~~ in the current year. Of this $19 million, $11 million related to favorable experience on a reinsured block and the remaining $8 million was the result of a correction of premiums related to a long-term care policy rider. Additionally, our group business, ~~increased $9 million largely as a result of higher sales in our non-medical products. These increases were partially~~ offset by a decrease of ~~$106~~$139 million in our payment protection business. The increase in our long-term care insurance business ~~which~~was attributable to growth in the long-term care insurance in-force block and included a ~~decrease~~$70 million increase in Medicare supplement attributable to the Continental acquisition. The increase in our life insurance business was due to in-force growth of ~~$39~~term life insurance. The increase in our group insurance business was principally from growth in our non-medical products, partially offset by decreases in medical and individual voluntary products. Our payment protection insurance business decreased largely from the U.K. market including a $28 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. ~~This decrease was principally due to a decrease of $124 million in the U.K. market, partially offset by an increase in continental Europe and Ireland.~~ The decrease infrom the U.K. market was ~~attributable to~~ the result of continued run-off of low return blocks of business and the exit from the travel insurance business. ~~The increase~~Partially offsetting these decreases was growth in continental Europe and Ireland ~~was the result of the growth due to~~from new distribution relationships and ~~the growth of~~an increase in consumer lending in those markets.

The prior year included $19 million of favorable items in our long-term care business that did not recur in the current year. Our long-term care business also decreased as a result of a $6 million classification to policy fees and other income in the current year.

The increase in net investment income ~~which included a $3 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates,~~ was ~~largely~~primarily the result of growth of our long-term care in-force block and an increase in ~~average invested assets and average variable rate yields, associated with~~ assets purchased using proceeds from our issuance of non-recourse funding obligations supporting certain term life insurance policies, ~~and~~partially offset by a $2 million decrease attributable to ~~new assets backing growth of~~changes in foreign exchange rates in our ~~long-term care~~payment protection insurance business.

For a discussion of net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

~~The increase in policy~~Policy fees and other income ~~is primarily due~~increased $13 million attributable to ~~an increase of $26~~$10 million in our long-term care insurance business and $6 million in our life insurance business, ~~principally~~offset by a $3 million decrease in our group business. The decrease in our group insurance business was related to an expected drop in lives from the planned migration to outside third-party administrators.

The increase in our life insurance business was largely due to growth of ~~the~~our universal life insurance ~~in-force~~products. Partially offsetting this was a $13 million decrease related to an adjustment in unearned revenue in the current year, a $9 million increase related to an adjustment to unearned revenue on a closed block of non-standard business in the prior year, and a $12 million ~~unfavorable~~decrease related to an adjustment on a reinsured block of term life insurance policies in the prior year. The current year increase in our long-term care insurance business is the result of a $6 million classification from premiums and $4 million reclassification from interest credited.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased ~~due~~$152 million attributable to a ~~$72~~$151 million increase in our long-term care insurance business, a ~~$17~~$32 million increase in our life insurance business and a ~~$13~~$20 million increase in our group insurance business, partially offset by a ~~$32~~decrease of $51 million ~~decrease~~ in our payment protection ~~insurance~~ business. The increase in our long-term care insurance business was ~~primarily~~ the result of aging and growth of the in-force block, ~~lower~~continued low termination rates on older issued policies, some with expiring reinsurance coverage, and

also included a ~~$17~~$52 million increase from the Continental ~~Life~~ acquisition. ~~Both years benefited from~~The increase in our life insurance business was due mainly to growth of our term and universal life in-force that was partially offset by favorable current year mortality. The increase in our group insurance business was principally driven by growth and higher claims in our non-medical insurance products. The decrease in our payment protection insurance business was primarily related to a reduction of claims in our run-off block of business within the U.K. and a $4 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Our long-term care business benefits and other changes in policy reserves also included reserve ~~adjustments.~~adjustments in both years. The prior year included $17 million of net favorable reserve adjustments including a favorable correction of a long-term care policy rider and a reserve adjustment on a closed block of business, partially offset by strengthening of claim reserves. The current year includes a $27 million decrease due to a favorable adjustment related to group long-term care policies. ~~The prior year included~~

Interest credited increased $17 million ~~of favorable reserve adjustments for a correction of a~~principally from $13 million in our long-term care ~~policy rider and strengthening of certain claim reserves. The increase in our group~~insurance business ~~is based upon continued~~driven by growth in cash surrender value of our ~~non-medical business which is partially offset by decreases in our medical products which are within expectations. The increase in our~~corporate owned life insurance ~~business is associated with growth~~block of the term life in-force blocks and unfavorable prior year mortality offset in part by favorable current year mortality. The decrease in our payment protection insurance business was largely driven by a reduction of claim reserves in our run-off block and also includes a decrease of $5 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.business.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals ~~decreased primarily due to~~increased $22 million from a ~~$41~~$43 million ~~decrease~~increase from our long-term care insurance business and a $12 million increase from our life insurance business, offset by decreases of $30 million in our payment protection insurance business ~~primarily associated with~~and $3 million in our ~~run-off block and also includes a $23 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. Our~~ group ~~business decreased $5 million as a result of favorable expense management and reduced sales related expenses. These increases were partially offset by a $35 million~~insurance business. The increase in our long-term care insurance business was largely ~~from~~the result of growth of ~~our~~ in-force, ~~premium levels driving higher renewal commission expense, a $5~~$12 million ~~increase~~ from the Continental ~~Life~~ acquisition and ~~an unfavorable~~ $8 million increase related to a reinsurance ~~adjustment. Our~~adjustment in the current year. The increase in our life insurance business ~~increased $9 million principally~~was primarily due to prior year expense favorability that did not recur in the current year. The decrease in our payment protection insurance business was principally from our run-off block and included a $15 million decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles decreased ~~primarily due to~~$95 million largely the result of a ~~$42~~$70 million decrease in our payment protection insurance business and ~~an $8~~a $19 million decrease ~~in our long-term care business, partially offset by a $13 million increase~~ in our life insurance business. The decrease in our payment protection insurance business was ~~largely attributable~~primarily due to lower amortization from our run-off block and ~~also includes~~was partially offset by a $9$7 million ~~decrease~~increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. ~~The decrease in our~~Our long-term care insurance business ~~is from an unfavorable~~decreased $4 million as a result of a $27 million unfavorable correction ~~related to~~of a long-term care policy rider in the prior year. This decrease iswas partially offset by higher amortization from growth of the in-force block of long-term care insurance and higher terminations in our Medicare supplement product. ~~The increase~~

Current year amortization in our life insurance business ~~is principally~~included decreases in our universal life insurance products of $7 million due to ~~growth of the term life~~an unearned revenue adjustment and $7 million associated with revisions to estimated gross profit assumptions. Prior year amortization also included a $10 million amortization adjustment in our universal life ~~in-force blocks.~~amortization.

Interest expense increased ~~$39~~$60 million ~~as the result of~~in our life insurance business from the issuance of additional non-recourse funding obligations ~~in the first quarter of 2006 and the second and third quarters of 2005,~~ and an increase in average variable rates paid on ~~non-recourse funding obligations supporting our term life insurance capital management strategy.~~those obligations.

The effective tax rate decreased to ~~34.7%~~35.0% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~35.5%~~35.6% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. The decrease in effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the increase in lower taxed foreign earnings and a reduction in excess foreign tax credits, ~~partially~~ offset by nonrecurring favorable examination developments in 2005.

The following tables set forth selected operating performance measures regarding our life insurance products as of or for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	For the three months ended June 30,				Percentage change		For the six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Three months ended September 30,				Percentage change		Nine months ended September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Term life insurance
Net earned premiums	$	221	$	186	19	%	$	434	$	377	15	%	$	224	$	205	9	%	$	658	$	582	13	%
Annualized first-year premiums		37		34	9	%		71		63	13	%		36		38	(5	)%		107		101	6	%
Revenue, net of reinsurance		277		206	34	%		545		433	26	%

Revenues														282		241	17	%		827		674	23	%
Universal and whole life insurance
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	118	$	100	18	%	$	240	$	200	20	%	$	112	$	104	8	%	$	352	$	304	16	%
Annualized first-year deposits		10		6	67	%		19		13	46	%		9		7	29	%		28		20	40	%
Excess deposits		22		8	175	%		41		14	193	%		24		12	100	%		65		26	150	%
Revenue, net of reinsurance		180		168	7	%		354		341	4	%

Revenues														163		187	(13	)%		517		528	(2	)%
Total life insurance
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	339	$	286	19	%	$	674	$	577	17	%	$	336	$	309	9	%	$	1,010	$	886	14	%
Annualized first-year premiums		37		34	9	%		71		63	13	%		36		38	(5	)%		107		101	6	%
Annualized first-year deposits		10		6	67	%		19		13	46	%		9		7	29	%		28		20	40	%
Excess deposits		22		8	175	%		41		14	193	%		24		12	100	%		65		26	150	%
Revenue, net of reinsurance		457		374	22	%		899		774	16	%
Revenues														445		428	4	%		1,344		1,202	12	%


	As of the six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		As of September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Term life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	409,103	$	350,224	17	%	$	422,163	$	366,131	15	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		571,014		508,330	12	%		583,780		525,264	11	%

Universal and whole life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	40,850	$	42,110	(3	)%	$	41,595	$	41,722	—	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		49,207		49,846	(1	)%		49,337		49,613	(1	)%

Total life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	449,953	$	392,334	15	%	$	463,758	$	407,853	14	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		620,221		558,176	11	%		633,117		574,877	10	%

Term life insurance. Term life insurance annualized first-year premiums ~~and insurance in-force, which represents the face amount for life insurance, increased~~decreased primarily as a result of ~~distribution expansion and the competitiveness of our product offerings. This increase in annualized first-year premiums was the primary driver for the~~an increasingly competitive pricing environment. The increase in term life insurance net earned premiums ~~revenues~~ and insurance ~~in-force.~~in-force was primarily due to growth of the in-force block of business as a result of new and renewal premiums. Term life insurance revenues also increased due to higher net investment income related to an increase in invested assets related to securities purchased using the proceeds from our issuance of non-recourse funding obligations supporting ~~certain~~our term life insurance ~~policies.~~capital management strategy.

Universal and whole life insurance. Universal life annualized first-year deposits increased primarily ~~due to~~from new product offerings gaining momentum in the market. The decrease in our in-force block was largely the result of the continued run-off on our closed block of whole life insurance.

The following tables set forth selected operating performance measures regarding our long-term care insurance business, which includes individual and group long-term care insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, as well as several run-off blocks of accident and health insurance and corporate-owned life insurance for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Three months ended September 30,				Percentage change		Nine months ended September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Net earned premiums	$	458	$	431	6	%	$	883	$	839	5	%	$	485	$	412	18	%	$	1,368	$	1,251	9	%
Annualized first-year premiums		51		42	21	%		99		83	19	%
Revenue, net of reinsurance		649		593	9	%		1,257		1,159	8	%
Annualized first-year premiums:
Long-term care														44		38	16	%		127		115	11	%
Medicare supplement and other A&H														7		3	133	%		23		9	130	%
Revenues														679		583	16	%		1,936		1,742	11	%

The increase in annualized first-year premiums was primarily due to an increase in individual long-term care products, including $6 million on new product sales in California in the third quarter of 2006 ahead of a price increase and the broadening of our product offering in Medicare supplement, including $4$5 million and $9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, from the Continental Life acquisition. The ~~additional layer of 2005 annualized first-year premiums was the primary driver for the~~ increase in net earned premium and revenue, ~~net~~was largely the result of ~~reinsurance.~~the additional layer of 2005 annualized first-year premiums. The increase in revenue was also ~~due~~ to the result of an ~~increase in~~higher net investment income principally ~~due to~~from an increase in average invested assets backing growth of our long-term care ~~business.~~business, partially offset by lower investment yields as a result of a continued low interest rate environment.

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our payment protection insurance and other related consumer protection insurance products for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Three months ended September 30,				Percentage change		Nine months ended September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Payment protection insurance gross written premiums and deposits	$	500	$	501	—	%	$	919	$	954	(4	)%
Payment protection insurance gross written premiums, premium equivalents and deposits													$	552	$	454	22	%	$	1,471	$	1,408	4	%
Mexico operations gross written premiums		15		12	25	%		31		24	29	%		18		14	29	%		49		38	29	%
Net earned premiums		322		352	(9	)%		613		719	(15	)%		310		343	(10	)%		923		1,062	(13	)%
Revenue, net of reinsurance		352		385	(9	)%		671		784	(14	)%
Revenues														340		373	(9	)%		1,011		1,157	(13	)%

Gross written premiums, premium equivalents and deposits, gross of ceded reinsurance and cancellations, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 includes ~~$32~~$96 million and $128 million, respectively, of gross deposits on a reciprocal reinsurance ~~transaction~~transactions, which we accounted for under the deposit method of accounting, and growth from continental Europe and Ireland. ~~Both periods include~~The three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 included an increase of $23 million and a decrease of $36 million, respectively, attributable to changes in foreign exchange ~~rates of $23 million and $59 million, respectively.~~rates. The remainder of the decrease compared to the respective prior year periods iswas largely driven by a decline of gross written premiums in the U.K., partially offset by growth in the continental Europe and Ireland market.

Net earned premiums and revenues for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 decreased primarily due to continued run-off of low return blocks of business in the U.K. market, the exit from our travel insurance business and a decrease attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, partially offset by growth in the continental Europe and Ireland markets.

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our group products for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Three months ended September 30,				Percentage change		Nine months ended September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Net earned premiums	$	168	$	165	2	%	$	336	$	327	3	%	$	176	$	166	6	%	$	512	$	493	4	%
Annualized first-year premiums		44		38	16	%		78		68	15	%		41		37	11	%		119		105	13	%
Revenue, net of reinsurance		181		179	1	%		364		356	2	%
Revenues														190		180	6	%		554		536	3	%

The increase in annualized first-year premiums ~~is attributable to~~was the result of growth in sales in non-medical products, partially offset by lower sales of medical products due to competitive pricing in that market. ~~This growth is also driving the increases~~Growth in ~~revenue and~~ net earned ~~premiums.~~premiums is the result of sales growth in recent periods, predominantly in the non-medical and individual products, partially offset by lapses primarily in medical products.

We offer U.S. customers fixed annuities, individual ~~and~~variable annuities, group variable annuities designed for 401(k) plans, single premium immediate annuities, variable life insurance, ~~asset management and~~ specialized products, including GICs, funding agreements and FABNs, and ~~structured settlements.~~asset management products and services.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Retirement Income and Investments segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three month ended June 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three month ended September 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	200		$	241	$	(41	)	(17	)%	$	210		$	189	$	21		11	%
Net investment income		487			432		55		13	%		475			455		20		4	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(45	)		—		(45	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(8	)		—		(8	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		84			62		22		35	%		85			61		24		39	%

Total revenues		726			735		(9	)	(1	)%		762			705		57		8	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		267			301		(34	)	(11	)%		284			247		37		15	%
Interest credited		282			256		26		10	%		286			274		12		4	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		80			66		14		21	%		76			66		10		15	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		40			32		8		25	%		46			33		13		39	%
Interest expense		1			1		—		—	%		2			1		1		100	%

Total benefits and expenses		670			656		14		2	%		694			621		73		12	%

Earnings before income taxes		56			79		(23	)	(29	)%
Income before income taxes												68			84		(16	)	(19	)%
Provision for income taxes		19			19		—		—	%		20			25		(5	)	(20	)%

Segment net earnings		37			60		(23	)	(38	)%
Adjustments to segment net earnings:
Net investment losses (gains), net of taxes and other adjustments		20			—		20		NM	⁽¹⁾
Segment net income												48			59		(11	)	(19	)%
Adjustments to segment net income:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments												5			—		5		NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net operating earnings	$	57		$	60	$	(3	)	(5	)%
Segment net operating income											$	53		$	59	$	(6	)	(10	)%

The following tables set forth net operating ~~earnings~~income for the products included in our Retirement Income and Investments segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Segment net operating earnings:
Segment net operating income:
Spread-based retail	$	29	$	35	$	(6	)	(17	)%	$	23	$	39	$	(16	)	(41	)%
Spread-based institutional		13		11		2		18	%		9		6		3		50	%
Fee-based		15		14		1		7	%		21		14		7		50	%

Total segment net operating earnings	$	57	$	60	$	(3	)	(5	)%
Total segment net operating income										$	53	$	59	$	(6	)	(10	)%

Segment net operating ~~earnings~~income from spread-based retail products decreased $16 million primarily due to a lower ~~effective tax rate~~investment income from bond calls and mortgage loan prepayments in the current year, an increase in DAC amortization resulting from higher lapses on fixed annuities and lower assets under management from withdrawals outpacing new deposits. Additionally, the prior year ~~related to favorable~~included income tax ~~examination developments.~~ favorability that did not recur in the current year.

Segment net operating ~~earnings~~income from spread-based institutional products increased $3 million largely from higher spreads and growth in assets under management related to our FABNs.

Segment net operating ~~earnings~~income on fee-based products increased $7 million principally as a result of income tax benefits from dividends received deductions including a change in a prior year estimate and growth in assets under ~~management.~~management driven by distribution expansion, favorable equity markets and continued product introduction and enhancements.

The ~~$41 million decrease~~increase in premiums was primarily the result of a ~~$61~~$53 million increase in our life-contingent single premium immediate annuities driven by higher sales. This increase was partially offset by a $28 million reduction in ~~sales of~~ our life-contingent structured settlement ~~annuities. This is~~annuities due to our continued pricing discipline in the ~~continuing~~ low long-term interest rate ~~environment. This decrease was partially offset by a $20 million increase~~environment and our decision in the third quarter of 2006 to discontinue sales of ~~our life-contingent single premium immediate annuities.~~this product.

The increase in net investment income was principally ~~due to increased~~a result of higher yields on floating rate investments backing spread-based institutional products and higher assets under management. Partially offsetting these increases were lower bond calls and commercial mortgage loan prepayment fees of $13 million as compared to prior year.

For a discussion of net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

The increase in policy fees and other income was primarily attributable to a ~~$20~~$22 million increase in the fee-based segment as a result of increased sales and growth in assets under management from distribution expansion, favorable equity markets and continued product introduction and enhancements.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves ~~decreased~~increased primarily as a result of ~~the decrease in the life-contingent structured settlement annuity sales, which were partially offset by an~~a $57 million increase in ~~sales of~~ life-contingent single premium immediate ~~annuities.~~annuities driven by higher sales, which was partially offset by a $21 million decrease in life-contingent structured settlement annuities due to our pricing discipline in the continuing low long-term interest rate environment and our decision in the third quarter of 2006 to discontinue sales of this product.

The increase in interest credited was principally due to a ~~$37~~$28 million increase related to spread-based institutional products as a result of ~~increased~~higher crediting rates on floating rate products and higher assets under management. This increase was partially offset by ~~an $11~~a $16 million decrease in interest credited on fixed annuities associated with crediting rates being reset to lower rates as the fixed annuities reach their initial crediting rate guarantee period.

The increase in acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, was primarily from ~~$16~~$13 million of ~~increased~~ expenses associated with higher sales and growth in assets under management in fee-based products.

The increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles was largely the result of ~~a $15~~an $11 million increase in spread-based retail products primarily due to higher lapses ~~and profit margins. Partially offsetting this increase was an $11 million reduction in amortization expense attributable to investment losses.~~of fixed annuities.

The effective tax rate ~~increased~~decreased to ~~33.9%~~29.4% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~24.1%~~29.8% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. This ~~increase~~decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to an increase in benefits from dividends received deductions including a change in prior year estimate, partially offset by nonrecurring favorable ~~tax~~IRS examination developments in 2005.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Retirement Income and Investments segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Six month ended June 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Nine months ended September 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	380		$	485	$	(105	)	(22	)%	$	590		$	674	$	(84	)	(12	)%
Net investment income		952			865		87		10	%		1,427			1,320		107		8	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(54	)		—		(54	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(62	)		—		(62	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		161			120		41		34	%		246			181		65		36	%

Total revenues		1,439			1,470		(31	)	(2	)%		2,201			2,175		26		1	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		508			609		(101	)	(17	)%		792			856		(64	)	(7	)%
Interest credited		560			506		54		11	%		846			780		66		8	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		152			125		27		22	%		228			191		37		19	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		76			59		17		29	%		122			92		30		33	%
Interest expense		2			1		1		100	%		4			2		2		100	%

Total benefits and expenses		1,298			1,300		(2	)	—	%		1,992			1,921		71		4	%

Earnings before income taxes		141			170		(29	)	(17	)%
Income before income taxes												209			254		(45	)	(18	)%
Provision for income taxes		49			50		(1	)	(2	)%		69			75		(6	)	(8	)%

Segment net earnings		92			120		(28	)	(23	)%
Adjustments to segment net earnings:
Net investment losses (gains), net of taxes and other adjustments		26			—		26		NM	⁽¹⁾
Segment net income												140			179		(39	)	(22	)%
Adjustments to segment net income:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments												31			—		31		NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net operating earnings	$	118		$	120	$	(2	)	(2	)%
Segment net operating income											$	171		$	179	$	(8	)	(4	)%

The following table sets forth net operating ~~earnings~~income for the products included in our Retirement Income and Investments segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Nine months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Segment net operating income:
Spread-based retail	$	88	$	108	$	(20	)	(19	)%
Spread-based institutional		32		26		6		23	%
Fee-based		51		45		6		13	%

Total segment net operating income	$	171	$	179	$	(8	)	(4	)%

Segment net operating income from spread-based retail products decreased $20 million primarily due to income tax favorability that did not recur in the current year, an increase in DAC amortization resulting from higher lapses on fixed annuities, lower net investment income related to bond calls and mortgage prepayments in the current year, unfavorable mortality on life-contingent annuities and lower assets under management from withdrawals outpacing new deposits.

Segment net operating income on fee-based products increased $6 million principally as a result of income tax benefits from dividends received deductions including a change in a prior year estimate and growth in assets under management driven by our distribution expansion, favorable equity markets and continued product introduction and enhancements.

Segment net operating earnings from spread-based ~~retail decreased~~institutional products increased $6 million primarily due to a lower effective tax rate in the prior year related to favorable tax examination developments. Segment net operating earnings on fee-based decreased from lower expenses in the prior year. Segment net operating earnings on spread-based institutional increased in connection with higher spreads and growth in assets under management related to our FABNs.

The decrease in premiums was primarily the result of a ~~$112~~$141 million reduction in ~~sales of~~ our life-contingent structured settlement ~~annuities. This is~~annuities due to our continued pricing discipline in the ~~continuing~~ low long-term interest rate ~~environment.~~environment and our decision in the third quarter of 2006 to discontinue sales of this product. This decrease was partially offset by a $7$59 million increase in ~~sales of~~ our life-contingent single premium immediate ~~annuities.~~annuities driven by higher sales.

The increase in net investment income was ~~mostly~~principally due to increased yields on floating rate investments backing spread-based institutional products and higher assets under management. Partially offsetting this increase was lower net investment income related to bond calls and mortgage prepayment of $14 million in the current year.

For a discussion of net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

The increase in policy fees and other income was ~~largely~~primarily attributable to a ~~$36~~$58 million increase in the fee-based segment as a result of increased sales and growth in assets under management from distribution expansion, favorable equity markets and continued product introduction and enhancements. In addition, surrender fees in our spread-based retail products increased $7 million.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves decreased ~~$101 million~~ primarily as a result of ~~the~~a $126 million decrease in ~~the~~ life-contingent structured settlement ~~annuity~~annuities due to our continued pricing discipline in the continuing low long-

term interest rate environment and our decision in the third quarter of 2006 to discontinue sales ~~which were~~of this product. This decrease was partially offset by ana $67 million increase in ~~sales of~~ life-contingent single premium immediate ~~annuities.~~annuities driven largely by higher sales.

The increase in interest credited was principally due to a ~~$69~~$97 million increase related to spread-based institutional products as a result of ~~increased~~higher crediting rates on floating rate products and higher assets under management. This increase was partially offset by a ~~$17~~$33 million decrease in interest credited on fixed annuities associated with crediting rates being reset to current, lower rates as the fixed annuities reach their initial crediting rate guarantee period.

The increase in acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, was primarily from increased expenses of $44 million associated with higher sales and growth in assets under management in fee-based products. ~~Additionally, the prior year included expense favorability that did not recur in the current year.~~This was partially offset by $5 million of lower expenses associated with our deferred annuities.

The increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles was largely the result of a ~~$15~~$24 million increase in spread-based retail products primarily due to higher lapses and more favorable gross profit margins. ~~Partially offsetting this increase was an $11~~Additionally, fee-based products increased by $5 million ~~reduction in amortization expense~~ attributable to ~~investment losses.~~growth in assets under management.

The effective tax rate increased to ~~34.8%~~33.0% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~29.4%~~29.5% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. This increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to a nonrecurring favorable ~~tax~~IRS examination ~~developments~~development in ~~2005.~~2005, offset by an increase in benefits from dividends received deductions including a change in prior year estimate.

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our spread-based retail products as of or for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	For the three months ended June 30,						Percentage change		For the six months ended June 30,						Percentage change		As of or for the three months ended September 30,						Percentage change		As of or for the nine months ended September 30,						Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005
Fixed annuities
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	15,241		$	15,214		—	%	$	15,547		$	15,113		3	%	$	14,835		$	15,540		(5	)%	$	15,547		$	15,113		3	%
Deposits		326			699		(53	)%		593			984		(40	)%		424			530		(20	)%		1,017			1,514		(33	)%
Interest credited		139			150		(7	)%		284			300		(5	)%		137			154		(11	)%		421			454		(7	)%
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(871	)		(523	)	67	%		(1,589	)		(857	)	85	%		(947	)		(548	)	73	%		(2,536	)		(1,405	)	80	%

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	14,835		$	15,540		(5	)%	$	14,835		$	15,540		(5	)%	$	14,449		$	15,676		(8	)%	$	14,449		$	15,676		(8	)%


Single premium immediate annuities
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	5,772		$	5,415		7	%	$	5,680		$	5,344		6	%	$	5,888		$	5,488		7	%	$	5,680		$	5,344		6	%
Net earned premiums and deposits		290			215		35	%		540			427		26	%		294			230		28	%		834			657		27	%
Interest credited		78			80		(3	)%		158			157		1	%		82			77		7	%		240			234		3	%
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(225	)		(222	)	1	%		(463	)		(440	)	5	%		(200	)		(217	)	(8	)%		(690	)		(657	)	5	%

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	5,915		$	5,488		8	%	$	5,915		$	5,488		8	%	$	6,064		$	5,578		9	%	$	6,064		$	5,578		9	%


Structured settlements
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	925		$	653		42	%	$	871		$	533		63	%	$	966		$	765		26	%	$	871		$	533		63	%
Net earned premiums and deposits		45			116		(61	)%		103			240		(57	)%		37			69		(46	)%		140			309		(55	)%
Interest credited		13			11		18	%		25			22		14	%		14			11		27	%		39			33		18	%
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(15	)		(15	)	—	%		(31	)		(30	)	3	%		(14	)		(14	)	—	%		(47	)		(44	)	7	%

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	968		$	765		27	%	$	968		$	765		27	%	$	1,003		$	831		21	%	$	1,003		$	831		21	%

Total premiums from spread-based retail products	$	200		$	241		(17	)%	$	380		$	485		(22	)%	$	210		$	189		11	%	$	590		$	674		(12	)%

Total deposits on spread-based retail products	$	461		$	789		(42	)%	$	856		$	1,166		(27	)%	$	545		$	640		(15	)%	$	1,401		$	1,806		(22	)%

Fixed annuities. The account value, net of reinsurance, decreased primarily due to lapses being greater than deposits ~~in the first half of~~throughout 2006. The attractiveness of certain fixed annuities has declined as a result of continued low long-term interest rates, a ~~relatively~~ flat yield curve and ~~short term~~competitiveness of short-term investment alternatives, such as certificates of deposit. These trends are having an adverse impact on both sales and retention of fixed annuities. In recent quarters, we have experienced improved spreads in fixed annuities ~~primarily due to~~principally from run-off of and crediting rate resets of historically higher crediting rate business. The continued low long-term interest rate environment and a relatively flat yield curve, along with our pricing discipline of selling business that meets our profitability objectives, have adversely affected sales and retention of our fixed annuities. We expect this trend to continue.

Single premium immediate annuities. The account value, net of reinsurance, increased primarily due to the positive net impact of new product sales, lower lapse percentages and ~~lapses along with~~higher interest credited on account values in 2005 and 2006.

Structured settlements. ~~We continue to write structured settlements to the extent that we are able to achieve our targeted returns.~~ Our continued pricing discipline in a challenging and competitive long-term interest rate environment was the primary ~~reason~~cause for ~~the~~ lower sales of these products during 2006. As a result, and upon completion of a strategic review of our structured settlement annuities, we decided in the ~~first six months~~third quarter of ~~2006.~~2006 to discontinue sales of this product based on relative profitability in this market compared to our other product lines. This exit is not expected to have a material impact on current or future earnings. We will, however, continue to service our current blocks of business.

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our spread-based institutional products as of the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,						Percentage change		Six months ended June 30,						Percentage change		As of or for the three months ended September 30,						Percentage change		As of or for the nine months ended September 30,						Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005
GICs, funding agreements and FABNs
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	9,766		$	9,408		4	%	$	9,777		$	9,541		2	%	$	9,886		$	9,162		8	%	$	9,777		$	9,541		2	%
Deposits⁽¹⁾		498			871		(43	)%		1,478			1,712		(14	)%		676			1,402		(52	)%		2,154			3,114		(31	)%
Interest credited		123			86		43	%		237			168		41	%		128			101		27	%		365			269		36	%
Surrenders and benefits⁽¹⁾		(501	)		(1,203	)	(58	)%		(1,606	)		(2,259	)	(29	)%		(878	)		(667	)	32	%		(2,484	)		(2,926	)	(15	)%

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	9,886		$	9,162		8	%	$	9,886		$	9,162		8	%	$	9,812		$	9,998		(2	)%	$	9,812		$	9,998		(2	)%

~~Spread-based~~Despite a slight decrease in account values due to GIC maturities, spread-based institutional account values ~~increased mostly due to~~benefited from the launch of our registered notes program in the fourth quarter of 2005. This program resulted in an issuance of $300 million of FABNs in ~~the fourth quarter of~~ 2005 and ~~$1,000~~$1,450 million ~~in the first half of~~during 2006. The increase in interest credited was driven by higher crediting rates on our floating rate products largely due to an increase in ~~the underlying indices. This was partially offset by expected maturities.~~short-term interest rates.

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our fee-based products as of the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	For the three months ended June 30,						Percentage change		For the six months ended June 30,						Percentage change		As of or for the three months ended September 30,						Percentage change		As of or for the nine months ended September 30,						Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005		2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005
Income Distribution Series⁽²⁾
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	1,235		$	540		129	%	$	911		$	462		97	%	$	1,555		$	634		145	%	$	911		$	462		97	%
Deposits		350			92		NM	⁽¹⁾		631			177		NM	⁽¹⁾		334			109		NM	⁽¹⁾		965			286		NM	⁽¹⁾
Interest credited and investment performance		(5	)		8		(163	)%		54			4		NM	⁽¹⁾		68			13		NM	⁽¹⁾		122			17		NM	⁽¹⁾
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(25	)		(6	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(41	)		(9	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(28	)		(9	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(69	)		(18	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	1,555		$	634		145	%	$	1,555		$	634		145	%	$	1,929		$	747		158	%	$	1,929		$	747		158	%


Traditional variable annuities
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	1,360		$	747		82	%	$	1,182		$	632		87	%	$	1,458		$	902		62	%	$	1,182		$	632		87	%
Deposits		147			145		1	%		279			288		(3	)%		105			137		(23	)%		384			425		(10	)%
Interest credited and investment performance		(17	)		29		(159	)%		61			16		NM	⁽¹⁾		54			35		54	%		113			51		122	%
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(30	)		(19	)	58	%		(62	)		(34	)	82	%		(32	)		(26	)	23	%		(94	)		(60	)	57	%

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	1,460		$	902		62	%	$	1,460		$	902		62	%	$	1,585		$	1,048		51	%	$	1,585		$	1,048		51	%


Variable life insurance
Account value, beginning of period	$	377		$	335		13	%	$	363		$	345		5	%	$	367		$	347		6	%	$	363		$	345		5	%
Deposits		7			11		(36	)%		16			19		(16	)%		7			7		—	%		23			26		(12	)%
Interest credited and investment performance		(5	)		11		(145	)%		13			—		NM	⁽¹⁾		10			13		(23	)%		23			13		77	%
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(12	)		(10	)	20	%		(25	)		(17	)	47	%		(13	)		(12	)	8	%		(38	)		(29	)	31	%

Account value, end of period	$	367		$	347		6	%	$	367		$	347		6	%	$	371		$	355		5	%	$	371		$	355		5	%


Third-party assets
Account value, beginning of period	$	5,824		$	4,046		44	%	$	5,180		$	3,973		30	%	$	6,143		$	4,335		42	%	$	5,180		$	3,973		30	%
Deposits		643			359		79	%		1,225			683		79	%		602			429		40	%		1,827			1,112		64	%
Interest credited and investment performance		(159	)		58		NM	⁽¹⁾		95			(38	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		154			160		(4	)%		249			122		104	%
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(165	)		(128	)	29	%		(357	)		(283	)	26	%		(133	)		(147	)	(10	)%		(490	)		(430	)	14	%

Account value, end of period	$	6,143		$	4,335		42	%	$	6,143		$	4,335		42	%	$	6,766		$	4,777		42	%	$	6,766		$	4,777		42	%

Income Distribution Series. We experienced an increase in assets under management attributable to the launch of our guaranteed minimum withdrawal for life benefit rider in the fourth quarter of 2005. Sales of this product remained strong ~~in the first half of~~during 2006, achieving the highest production to date in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006.

Traditional variable annuities. The increase in assets under management was ~~attributable to~~principally the result of ongoing sales of our core income series variable annuity products and ~~positive investment performance~~favorable equity markets for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006. In addition, the introduction of our group variable annuity product in the fourth quarter of 2005 has contributed to the growth in our assets under management.

Third-party assets. Third-party assets include assets managed by our Genworth Financial Asset Management and Genworth Financial Advisor groups. The increase in third-party assets was primarily due to growth in managed money accounts from new and existing clients, as well as ~~positive investment performance during the last three quarters of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006.~~favorable equity markets. Significant contributors to the growth in deposits ~~was~~were the result of expansion of our distribution network, growth in our sales force, and changes in our fee structure. On October 20, 2006, we acquired AssetMark Investment Services, Inc., an investment management and advisor company with more than $9 billion in third-party assets under management.

In the U.S., Canada, Australia, Europe, New Zealand, Mexico and Japan, we offer mortgage insurance products that facilitate homeownership by enabling borrowers to buy homes with low-down-payment ~~mortgages.~~mortgages and mortgage related services for our financial services customers. These products generally also aid financial institutions in managing their capital efficiently by reducing the capital required for low-down-payment mortgages.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Mortgage Insurance segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:

The following table sets forth net operating ~~earnings~~income for the products included in our Mortgage Insurance segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change				Three months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005				2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Segment net operating earnings:
Segment net operating income:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	72	$	61	$	11	18	%	$	53	$	58	$	(5	)	(9	)%
International mortgage insurance		90		60		30	50	%		81		68		13		19	%

Total segment net operating earnings	$	162	$	121	$	41	34	%
Total segment net operating income									$	134	$	126	$	8		6	%

Our U.S. mortgage insurance business segment net operating ~~earnings increased~~income remained flat compared to the prior year excluding $5 million, net of tax, of favorable net adjustments to losses, expenses and taxes in the prior year that did not recur. Higher losses and a higher effective tax rate were partially offset by ~~$11 million primarily due to~~ lower ~~administrative costs from productivity gains, higher net investment income~~expenses, growth in premiums and an increase in earnings from our intra-segment reinsurance and capital maintenance agreements with our international mortgage insurance business. ~~The increase in our~~

Our international mortgage insurance business segment net operating ~~earnings~~income increase includes an increase of ~~$30 million, which included $3~~$5 million, net of tax, ~~of favorability due~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates ~~was driven largely by~~and favorable adjustments to losses of $6 million, net of tax, in the ~~growth~~prior year that did not recur. Growth of the business and seasoning of our insurance in-force ~~and a decrease in effective tax rate. These increases~~ were partially offset by an increase in losses from portfolio seasoning and higher ~~delinquencies~~losses from a limited number of Australian distribution relationships, ~~and~~as well as continued investments in our global expansion.

Our international mortgage insurance premiums increased by ~~$44~~$37 million, $8 million of which ~~included an increase of $2 million associated with~~was attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, driven by the growth and aging of our international in-force block ~~which resulted in increased earned premiums from prior years new insurance written. This increase in premiums also includes the impact~~ of ~~an $8 million adjustment reducing unearned premium reserves in Australia and a modest increase in international cancellations.~~business. The increase in our U.S. mortgage insurance business of $3$7 million was primarily driven by increased flow premiums resulting from higher average price per policy, increased reinsurance premiums assumed from our international mortgage insurance ~~business.~~business and higher bulk premiums.

The increase in net investment income of $13 million, which included ana $3 million increase ~~of $1 million associated with~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, was largely the result of an increase in invested assets associated with the growth of our international mortgage insurance ~~business and increased yield in the investment portfolio of our U.S. mortgage insurance~~ business.

Policy fees and other income ~~remained relatively flat~~decreased by $4 million primarily due to the recent elimination of Canadian application fees in our ~~U.S. and~~ international mortgage insurance ~~businesses.~~business.

Our international mortgage insurance benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased ~~$12~~$23 million, ~~which included an increase of~~including a $1 million ~~associated with~~increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange ~~rates,~~rates. This increase was primarily driven by higher losses ~~in Australia reflecting the~~from seasoning of more recent in-force blocks of business, ~~and~~ increased ~~delinquencies~~losses from a limited number of Australian distribution ~~relationships.~~relationships and $9 million of favorable adjustments in the prior year that did not recur. The ~~decrease~~increase in our U.S. mortgage insurance business of $1$17 million was ~~largely~~primarily attributable to the ~~result of~~increase in losses associated with a ~~reduction in paid claims due to a~~smaller decline in our average reserve per delinquency than the ~~number of claims.~~prior year and a $5 million favorable adjustment to reserves on our prime bulk business in the prior year that did not recur.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals decreased in our U.S. mortgage insurance business primarily driven by ~~improved productivity.~~continued productivity initiatives and other expense reductions, lower contract underwriting volume and $4 million of non-recurring expenses in the prior year quarter. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals in our international mortgage insurance business increased as a result of continued investment in our existing international mortgage insurance platforms and potential new international ~~platforms.~~platforms as well as a $2 million increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Amortization~~Our U.S. mortgage insurance business amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles ~~remained relatively flat~~decreased $4 million primarily due to an acceleration of amortization of deferred acquisition costs in the prior year related to low persistency rates. The increase in our ~~U.S. and~~ international mortgage insurance ~~businesses.~~business amortization of deferred acquisition costs was mainly due to the growth and seasoning of our insurance in-force in our international business.

Provision for income taxes increased ~~$10~~$11 million, which ~~included an~~includes a $2 million increase ~~of $1 million associated with~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The effective tax rate ~~decreased~~increased to ~~27.6%~~28.3% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~30.1%~~25.0% for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. This ~~decrease~~increase in effective tax rate was primarily attributable to nonrecurring favorable IRS examination developments in 2005, offset by the increase in lower taxed foreign earnings and a reduction in excess foreign tax credits. Our Mortgage Insurance segment’s effective tax rate is below the statutory rate primarily as a result of tax-exempt investment income and lower taxed foreign earnings.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Mortgage Insurance segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Six months ended June 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Nine months ended September 30,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005		2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	514		$	435	$	79		18	%	$	776		$	653	$	123		19	%
Net investment income		165			137		28		20	%		251			210		41		20	%
Net investment gains (losses)		2			—		2		NM	⁽¹⁾		2			—		2		NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		18			22		(4	)	(18	)%		26			34		(8	)	(24	)%

Total revenues		699			594		105		18	%		1,055			897		158		18	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		96			60		36		60	%		172			96		76		79	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		144			134		10		7	%		220			215		5		2	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		28			24		4		17	%		45			42		3		7	%

Total benefits and expenses		268			218		50		23	%		437			353		84		24	%

Earnings before income taxes		431			376		55		15	%
Income before income taxes												618			544		74		14	%
Provision for income taxes		119			114		5		4	%		172			156		16		10	%

Segment net earnings		312			262		50		19	%
Adjustments to segment net earnings:
Net investment losses (gains), net of taxes and other adjustments		(1	)		—		(1	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Segment net income												446			388		58		15	%
Adjustments to segment net income:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments												(1	)		—		(1	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net operating earnings	$	311		$	262	$	49		19	%
Segment net operating income											$	445		$	388	$	57		15	%

The following table sets forth net operating ~~earnings~~income for the products included in our Mortgage Insurance segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Six months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change				Nine months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005				2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Segment net operating earnings:
Segment net operating income:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	144	$	133	$	11	8	%	$	197	$	191	$	6	3	%
International mortgage insurance		167		129		38	29	%		248		197		51	26	%

Total segment net operating earnings	$	311	$	262	$	49	19	%
Total segment net operating income									$	445	$	388	$	57	15	%

Our U.S. mortgage insurance business segment net operating earnings increased ~~by $11 million primarily~~ as a result of ~~higher investment income,~~ lower ~~administrative costs from productivity gains and~~expenses, an increase in earnings from our intra-segment reinsurance

and capital maintenance agreements with our international mortgage insurance ~~business. The~~business and higher investment income. These were partially offset by an increase in ~~our~~losses and a higher effective tax rate. The current year includes a $2 million, net of tax, favorable adjustment to losses. The prior year includes $5 million, net of tax, favorable net adjustments to losses, expenses and taxes.

Our international mortgage insurance business segment net operating earnings ~~of $38~~increased by $51 million, ~~which included $4~~including $9 million, net of tax, ~~of favorable~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, ~~was~~ driven ~~largely~~ by ~~the~~ growth of the business, seasoning of our insurance in-force and a decrease in effective tax rate. These ~~increases~~ were partially offset by an increase in losses from portfolio seasoning and higher ~~delinquencies~~losses from a limited number of Australian distribution relationships, ~~and~~as well as continued investments in our global expansion. The current year includes $5 million, net of tax, of favorable adjustments to premiums. The prior year includes $12 million, net of tax, of favorable adjustments to premiums and losses.

Our international mortgage insurance premiums increased by ~~$71~~$108 million, which included an increase of $3$11 million ~~associated with~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, driven by the growth and aging of our international in-force block, which resulted in increased earned premiums from prior-year new insurance written. The year-over-year increase was impacted by ~~the~~a $10 million release of unearned premium reserves on our single premium product ~~of $10 million~~ in the first quarter of 2005 due to the completion of a European cancellation study and was partially offset by an $8 million favorable adjustment ~~reducing~~of unearned premium reserves in Australia in the second quarter of ~~2006 and a modest~~2006. The increase in ~~international cancellations. The increase~~premiums of $15 million in our U.S. mortgage insurance business was primarily ~~driven by~~due to increased reinsurance premiums assumed from our international mortgage insurance ~~business.~~business, increased bulk premiums and increased flow premiums resulting from increased average price.

The increase in net investment income, which included an increase of $2$4 million ~~due~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, was largely the result of an increase in invested assets associated with the growth of our international mortgage insurance ~~business~~ and increased yield in the investment portfolio of our U.S. mortgage insurance business.

The decrease in policy fees and other income was primarily ~~driven by~~from lower fees for contract underwriting services ~~and lower other income~~ in our U.S. mortgage insurance business and the recent elimination of Canadian application fees in our international mortgage insurance business.

Our ~~international~~U.S. mortgage insurance benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased ~~$33~~$20 million ~~which included~~primarily driven by an increase ~~of $1 million~~in losses associated with changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily due to higher losses in Australia reflecting the seasoning of more recent in-force blocks of business and increased delinquencies from a limited number of distribution relationships. Thean increase in our ~~U.S. business of $3 million was principally due to an increase in~~ average reserve per delinquency ~~which~~and an

increase of $5 million related to a prime bulk reserve adjustment in the prior year that did not recur. This was partially offset by claims paid favorability and a $3 million decrease in reserves for severely impacted areas associated with Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Our international mortgage insurance benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased $56 million primarily driven by higher losses in Australia reflecting the seasoning of more recent in-force blocks of business, increased losses from a limited number of distribution relationships in Australia and an increase of $9 million related to loss adjustments in the prior year that did not recur.

The increase in acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, was primarily ~~attributable~~due to an increase in costs infrom our existing international platforms and continued investment in potential new international mortgage insurance platforms as well as a $2 million increase attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. This increase was partially offset ~~by improved productivity~~ in our U.S. mortgage insurance ~~business.~~business as a result of continued productivity improvements and other expense reductions, lower contract underwriting volume and an increase in indemnity reserves related to our U.S. contract services offerings in the prior year that did not recur.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles increased ~~by $4 million principally due to~~as a result of the growth and seasoning in our international mortgage insurance ~~business.~~business which was partially offset by $6 million of accelerated amortization of deferred acquisition costs as a result of low persistency in the prior year that did not recur.

Provision for income taxes increased $16 million, which includes a $5 million ~~which included an~~ increase ~~of $2 million associated with~~attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The effective tax rate decreased to ~~27.6%~~27.8% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 from ~~30.3%~~28.7% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. This decrease in effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the increase in lower taxed foreign earnings and a reduction in excess foreign tax ~~credits.~~credits, offset by nonrecurring favorable IRS examination developments in 2005. Our Mortgage Insurance segment’s effective tax rate is below the statutory rate primarily as a result of tax-exempt investment income and lower taxed foreign earnings.

The following tables set forth selected operating performance measures regarding our U.S. and international mortgage businesses as of or for the dates indicated:


	For the three months ended June 30,				Percentage change		For the six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		Three months ended September 30,				Percentage change		Nine months ended September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Net premiums written:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	119	$	111	7	%	$	234	$	220	6	%	$	121	$	112	8	%	$	355	$	332	7	%
International mortgage insurance		244		168	45	%		448		305	47	%		311		204	52	%		759		509	49	%

Total net premiums written	$	363	$	279	30	%	$	682	$	525	30	%	$	432	$	316	37	%	$	1,114	$	841	32	%

Net premiums earned:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	116	$	113	3	%	$	232	$	224	4	%	$	118	$	111	6	%	$	350	$	335	4	%
International mortgage insurance		151		107	41	%		282		211	34	%		144		107	35	%		426		318	34	%

Total net premium earned	$	267	$	220	21	%	$	514	$	435	18	%	$	262	$	218	20	%	$	776	$	653	19	%

New insurance written:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	8,200	$	7,200	14	%	$	15,000	$	12,900	16	%	$	8,200	$	7,200	14	%	$	23,200	$	20,100	15	%
International mortgage insurance		21,700		21,400	1	%		42,100		35,600	18	%		28,700		21,000	37	%		70,800		56,600	25	%

Total new insurance written	$	29,900	$	28,600	5	%	$	57,100	$	48,500	18	%	$	36,900	$	28,200	31	%	$	94,000	$	76,700	23	%

For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the increase in net premiums written was primarily driven by increases in new insurance written in our international mortgage insurance business. The increase in our international mortgage insurance business of $107 million, which included an increase of $17 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, was primarily the result of an increase in flow new insurance written. The increase in net premiums written in our U.S. mortgage insurance business of $9 million was primarily due to higher flow average price per policy, more sales of our single premium product and increased reinsurance premiums assumed from our international mortgage insurance business.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the increase in net premiums written was primarily due to increases in new insurance written in our international mortgage insurance business. The increase in our international business of $250 million, which included an increase of $19 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, was the result of an increase in new insurance written. Included in the international increase was the impact of a catch-up of sales reported to us due to a delay in timing of customer reporting in Australia. The increase in net premiums written in our U.S. mortgage insurance business of $23 million was principally from higher flow average price per policy, higher sales of our single premium product and increased reinsurance premiums assumed from our international mortgage insurance business.

Most of our international mortgage insurance policies provide for single premiums at the time that loan proceeds are advanced. We initially record the single premiums to unearned premium reserves and recognize the premiums earned over time in accordance with the estimated expiration of risk. As of September 30, 2006, our unearned premium reserves in our international mortgage insurance business increased to $2.3 billion from $1.7 billion as of September 30, 2005.

For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the increase in new insurance written was primarily driven by our international mortgage insurance business. International new insurance written increased $7.7 billion, which included an increase of $1.1 billion attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The increase in international new insurance written was largely due to growth in international flow and bulk products, which was primarily the result of ongoing expansion of our customer base in Europe and continued account penetration in Canada. U.S. new insurance written increased $1.0 billion associated with an increase in our bulk product writings.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the increase in new insurance written was driven by both our U.S. and international mortgage insurance businesses. International new insurance written increased $14.2 billion, which included an increase of $0.3 billion attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The increase in international new insurance written was primarily due to growth in international flow insurance which is the result of the ongoing expansion of our customer base in Europe, continued account penetration in Canada, strong sales by key customers in Australia and a catch-up of sales reported to us caused by a delay in timing of customer reporting in Australia. U.S. new insurance written increased $3.1 billion primarily due to an increase in our bulk product writings and a modest increase in flow new insurance written.


	As of the six months ended June 30,				Percentage change		As of September 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Primary insurance in-force:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	102,000	$	104,300	(2	)%	$	104,000	$	101,900	2	%
International mortgage insurance		271,600		210,200	29	%		319,600		231,000	38	%

Total primary insurance in-force	$	373,600	$	314,500	19	%	$	423,600	$	332,900	27	%

Risk in-force:
U.S. mortgage insurance	$	22,500	$	22,900	(2	)%	$	23,000	$	22,500	2	%
International mortgage insurance		86,600		67,800	28	%		102,700		74,500	38	%

Total risk in-force	$	109,100	$	90,700	20	%	$	125,700	$	97,000	30	%

The increases in primary insurance in-force and risk in-force were driven ~~primarily~~ by new insurance written in our international mortgage insurance business as we continue to execute our global expansion ~~strategy. Offsetting strong increases in international~~strategy and higher policy persistency combined with new insurance ~~in-force and risk in-force was a year-over-year decline~~written in our U.S. mortgage insurance business. ~~This decline was driven by policy cancellations which have exceeded new insurance written.~~ Our U.S. flow persistency was 72% and ~~65%~~64% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and ~~June~~September 30, 2005. We believe that sustained higher interest rates and increased persistency will lead to stable to growing levels of insurance in-force. Primary insurance in-force in our U.S. mortgage insurance business increased from ~~$100 billion as of March 31, 2006 to~~ $102 billion as of June 30, 2006 to $104 billion as of September 30, 2006. This increase in primary ~~insurance in-force~~insurance-in-force reflected athe second sequential quarter increase in flow insurance in-force ~~for the first time in~~after nearly five ~~years.~~years of decline.

Our businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Canada currently provide 100% coverage on the majority of the loans we insure in those markets. For the purpose of representing our risk in-force, we have computed an “effective risk in-force” amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance

in-force a factor that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ending ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, this factor was 35%.

For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the increase in net premiums written was driven primarily by increases in new insurance written in our international mortgage insurance business. The increase in our international mortgage insurance business of $76 million, which included an increase of $4 million associated with changes in foreign exchange rates, was the result of an increase in flow new insurance written. The increase in net premiums written in our U.S. mortgage insurance business of $8 million was mostly due to increased reinsurance premiums assumed from our international mortgage insurance business and increased sales of our single premium product.

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the increase in net premiums written was driven primarily by increases in new insurance written in our international mortgage insurance business. The increase in our international business of $143 million, which included an increase of $2 million associated with changes in foreign exchange rates, was the result of an increase in flow new insurance written. Included in the international increase was the impact of a catch-up of sales reported to us caused by a delay in timing of customer reporting in Australia. The increase in net premiums written in our U.S. mortgage insurance business of $14 million was largely attributable to increased reinsurance premiums assumed from our international mortgage insurance business and increased sales of our single premium product.

Most of our international mortgage insurance policies provide for single premiums at the time that loan proceeds are advanced. We initially record the single premiums to unearned premium reserves and recognize the premiums earned over time in accordance with the estimated expiration of risk. As of June 30, 2006, our unearned premium reserves in our international mortgage insurance business increased to $2.1 billion from $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2005.

For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the increase in new insurance written was driven primarily by our U.S. mortgage insurance business. U.S. new insurance written increased $1.0 billion associated with an increase in our bulk product writings and a modest increase in flow new insurance written. International new insurance written increased $0.3 billion, which included a decrease of $0.2 billion related to changes in foreign exchange rates. The increase in international new insurance written was largely due to growth in international flow which is the result of ongoing expansion of our customer base in Europe, continued account penetration in Canada and strong sales by key customers in Australia. Offsetting this increase was a decline in bulk new insurance written.

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the increase in new insurance written was driven by both our U.S. and international mortgage insurance businesses. International new insurance written increased $6.5 billion, which included a decrease of $0.8 billion associated with changes in foreign exchange rates. The increase in international new insurance written was largely driven by growth in international flow which is the result of the ongoing expansion of our customer base in Europe, continued account penetration in Canada, strong sales by key customers in Australia and a catch-up of sales reported to us caused by a delay in timing of customer reporting in Australia. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in bulk new insurance written, associated with strong volume in the prior year, which was not repeated in the current year. U.S. new insurance written increased $2.1 billion driven by an increase in our bulk writings and a modest increase in flow new insurance written.


	For the three months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease)		For the six months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease)		Three months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease)		Nine months ended September 30,				Increase (decrease)
	2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005		2006		2005		2006 vs. 2005
Loss ratio:
U.S. mortgage insurance	21	%	22	%	(1	)%	19	%	18	%	1	%	37	%	24	%	13	%	25	%	20	%	5	%
International mortgage insurance	17	%	13	%	4	%	19	%	9	%	10	%	22	%	8	%	14	%	20	%	9	%	11	%
Total loss ratio	19	%	18	%	1	%	19	%	14	%	5	%	29	%	17	%	12	%	22	%	15	%	7	%

Expense ratio:
U.S. mortgage insurance	33	%	42	%	(9	)%	34	%	40	%	(6	)%	36	%	55	%	(19	)%	35	%	45	%	(10	)%
International mortgage insurance	20	%	24	%	(4	)%	21	%	23	%	(2	)%	16	%	18	%	(2	)%	19	%	21	%	(2	)%
Total expense ratio	25	%	32	%	(7	)%	25	%	30	%	(5	)%	22	%	31	%	(9	)%	24	%	31	%	(7	)%

The loss ratio ~~(expressed as a percentage)~~ is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expense to net premiums earned.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, ~~the~~our U.S. loss ratio increased 13 percentage points primarily driven by an increase in ~~loss ratio was driven primarily by~~losses associated with a smaller decline in our ~~international business.~~average reserve per delinquency than the prior year and a $5 million favorable adjustment to prime bulk reserves in the prior year that did not recur. The international loss ratio increased 414 percentage points principally ~~due~~from higher losses as a result of seasoning of more recent in-force blocks of business and increased losses from a limited number of Australian distribution relationships, and an increase of $9 million related to loss adjustments in the prior year that did not recur.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our international loss ratio increased 11 percentage points principally from higher losses in Australia reflecting the seasoning of more recent in-force blocks of business and increased ~~delinquencies from a limited number of distribution relationships. The decrease in our U.S. loss ratio was largely the result of a reduction in paid claims due to a decline in the number of claims.~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the increase in loss ratio was driven primarily by our international business. The international loss ratio increased 10 percentage points principally due to higher losses ~~in Australia reflecting the seasoning of more recent in-force blocks of business and increased delinquencies~~ from a limited number of distribution relationships. The increase in our U.S. loss ratio was largely the result of an increase in ~~the~~our average reserve per delinquency.

The expense ratio ~~(expressed as a percentage)~~ is the ratio of general expenses to net premiums written. In our business, general expenses consist of acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and amortization of deferred acquisition cost and intangibles.

For the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the decrease in the expense ratio was primarily driven by ~~improved~~continued productivity improvements and other expense reductions in our U.S. mortgage

insurance business and strong net premiums written growth in our international mortgage insurance business, partially offset by an increase in costs in our existing international platforms and continued investment in potential new international mortgage insurance platforms.

The Corporate and Other segment consists primarily of unallocated corporate net investment income and expenses, the results of a small, non-core business that is managed outside our operating segments, and most of our interest expense and other financing costs.

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Corporate and Other segment for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended September 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	7		$	12		$	(5	)	(42	)%	$	9		$	7		$	2		29	%
Net investment income		17			30			(13	)	(43	)%		20			53			(33	)	(62	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		(3	)		—			(3	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		—			(7	)		7		NM	⁽¹⁾
Policy fees and other income		4			2			2		100	%		3			3			—		—	%

Total revenues		25			44			(19	)	(43	)%		32			56			(24	)	(43	)%

Expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1			1			—		—	%		1			3			(2	)	(67	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		15			30			(15	)	(50	)%		25			27			(2	)	(7	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		1			2			(1	)	(50	)%		1			3			(2	)	(67	)%
Interest expense		53			57			(4	)	(7	)%		51			58			(7	)	(12	)%

Total benefits and expenses		70			90			(20	)	(22	)%		78			91			(13	)	(14	)%

Loss before income taxes		(45	)		(46	)		1		(2	)%		(46	)		(35	)		(11	)	(31	)%
Benefit for income taxes		(13	)		(17	)		4		(24	)%		(14	)		(12	)		(2	)	17	%
Cumulative effect of accounting change													—			—			—		—	%

Segment net loss		(32	)		(29	)		(3	)	10	%		(32	)		(23	)		(9	)	(39	)%
Adjustments to segment net loss:
Net investment losses (gains), net of taxes and other adjustments		1			—			1		NM	⁽¹⁾
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments													—			4			(4	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—			—			—		—	%		—			—			—		—	%

Segment net operating loss	$	(31	)	$	(29	)	$	(2	)	7	%	$	(32	)	$	(19	)	$	(13	)	(68	)%

The increase in the segment net operating loss iswas primarily attributable to ~~higher interest rates on our corporate debt, offset by operating expenses principally due to~~ lower unallocated ~~overhead expenses in 2006 remaining~~investment income and lower limited partnership distribution income in the ~~Corporate~~current year. The lower unallocated investment income is the result of our capital management strategy utilizing excess capital for the Continental acquisition and ~~Other segment.~~for $675 million of stock buybacks in 2006.

~~Premiums decreased largely from continued run-off of certain credit life insurance blocks.~~

The decrease in net investment income was primarily ~~due to~~the result of lower income of $13 million from consolidated securitization entities, which were derecognized in the first quarter of ~~2006.~~2006, lower unallocated investment income of $10 million and a $7 million decrease in net investment income from limited partnership distributions

For a discussion of net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

~~Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased primarily from lower unallocated overhead expenses remaining in the Corporate and Other segment in 2006 compared to 2005.~~

Interest expense consists of interest and other financial charges related to our debt that is not allocated for segment reporting purposes. The decrease was primarily associated with the first quarter 2006 derecognition of borrowings related to securitization entities which was partially offset by a higher interest rate environment on corporate debt.

The ~~decreased~~increased tax benefit is driven primarily by higher pretax losses for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, ~~was primarily attributable to~~offset by an increase in non-deductible expenses.

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 Compared to ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Corporate and Other segment for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Six months ended June 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Nine months ended September 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005					2006			2005			2006 vs. 2005
Revenues:
Premiums	$	14		$	20		$	(6	)	(30	)%	$	23		$	27		$	(4	)	(15	)%
Net investment income		50			64			(14	)	(22	)%		70			117			(47	)	(40	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		(21	)		(6	)		(15	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(21	)		(13	)		(8	)	(62	)%
Policy fees and other income		7			6			1		17	%		10			9			1		11	%

Total revenues		50			84			(34	)	(40	)%		82			140			(58	)	(41	)%

Expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		2			2			—		—	%		3			5			(2	)	(40	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		20			29			(9	)	(31	)%		45			56			(11	)	(20	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		2			5			(3	)	(60	)%		3			8			(5	)	(63	)%
Interest expense		109			120			(11	)	(9	)%		160			178			(18	)	(10	)%

Total benefits and expenses		133			156			(23	)	(15	)%		211			247			(36	)	(15	)%

Loss before income taxes		(83	)		(72	)		(11	)	15	%		(129	)		(107	)		(22	)	(21	)%
Benefit for income taxes		(25	)		(25	)		—		—	%		(39	)		(37	)		(2	)	5	%
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes		4			—			4		NM	⁽¹⁾		4			—			4		NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net loss		(54	)		(47	)		(7	)	15	%		(86	)		(70	)		(16	)	(23	)%
Adjustments to segment net loss:
Net investment losses (gains), net of taxes and other adjustments		13			4			9		NM	⁽¹⁾
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments													13			8			5		63	%
Cumulative effect of accounting change		(4	)		—			(4	)	NM	⁽¹⁾		(4	)		—			(4	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Segment net operating loss	$	(45	)	$	(43	)	$	(2	)	5	%	$	(77	)	$	(62	)	$	(15	)	(24	)%

The increase in the segment net operating loss iswas primarily attributable ~~to higher interest expense primarily due to higher interest rates on our corporate debt, offset by operating expenses primarily due~~ to lower unallocated ~~overhead expenses~~net investment income driven by lower income from consolidated securitization entities, which were derecognized in the first quarter of 2006, lower unallocated investments and higher interest expense. The lower unallocated investment income is the result of our capital management strategy utilizing excess capital for the Continental

acquisition for $675 million for stock buybacks in 2006 ~~remaining~~and the increase in interest expenses was the ~~Corporate~~result of the higher interest rate environment on corporate debt. The lower unallocated investment income was partially offset by a decrease in unallocated acquisition and ~~Other segment.~~operating expenses, net of deferrals, as a result of increased expense allocation to other business segments.

Premiums decreased ~~largely as the result of~~mainly from continued run-off of certain credit life insurance blocks.

The decrease in net investment income was primarily the result of lower income from consolidated securitization entities, which were derecognized in the first quarter of 2006 ~~partially offset by an increase in net investment income from limited partnerships.~~and lower unallocated invested assets.

For a discussion of net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased primarily ~~from~~as a result of lower unallocated ~~overhead~~ expenses remaining in the Corporate and Other segment in 2006 compared to 2005.

~~Interest expense consists of interest and other financial charges related to our debt that is not allocated for segment reporting purposes.~~ The decrease in interest expense was primarily associated with the first quarter 2006 derecognition of borrowings related to securitization entities which was partially offset by a higher interest rate environment on corporate debt.

The increased tax benefit for additional pretax loss for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 ~~was~~is offset by an increase in non-deductible expenses.

The following tables set forth information about our investment income, excluding net investment gains (losses), for each component of our investment portfolio for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


	Three months ended June 30,										Increase (decrease)					Three months ended September 30,										Increase (decrease)
	2006					2005					2006 vs. 2005					2006					2005					2006 vs. 2005
(Amounts in millions)	Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount
Fixed maturities—taxable	5.8	%	$	731		5.5	%	$	665		0.3	%	$	66		5.8	%	$	735		5.7	%	$	690		0.1	%	$	45
Fixed maturities—non-taxable	4.5	%		31		4.5	%		32		—	%		(1	)	4.7	%		32		4.5	%		31		0.2	%		1
Commercial mortgage loans	6.9	%		138		6.0	%		98		0.9	%		40		6.1	%		126		6.6	%		116		(0.5	)%		10
Equity securities	16.1	%		7		8.6	%		6		7.5	%		1		15.9	%		6		0.3	%		6		15.6	%		—
Other investments	6.4	%		12		4.6	%		10		1.8	%		2		4.0	%		9		9.9	%		25		(5.9	)%		(16	)
Policy loans	9.1	%		32		8.9	%		27		0.2	%		5		8.5	%		32		8.5	%		27		—	%		5
Restricted investments held by securitization entities	—	%		—		6.3	%		13		(6.3	)%		(13	)	—	%		—		6.3	%		12		(6.3	)%		(12	)
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	3.6	%		20		1.8	%		7		1.8	%		13		4.0	%		23		3.0	%		13		1.0	%		10

Gross investment income before expenses and fees	5.9	%		971		5.5	%		858		0.4	%		113		5.8	%		963		5.8	%		920		—	%		43
Expenses and fees				(18	)				(16	)				(2	)				(19	)				(18	)				(1	)

Net investment income	5.8	%	$	953		5.4	%	$	842		0.4	%	$	111		5.7	%	$	944		5.7	%	$	902		—	%	$	42


	Six months ended June 30,										Increase (decrease)					Nine months ended September 30,										Increase (decrease)
	2006					2005					2006 vs. 2005					2006					2005					2006 vs. 2005
(Amounts in millions)	Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount			Yield		Amount
Fixed maturities—taxable	5.8	%	$	1,450		5.5	%	$	1,334		0.3	%	$	116		5.8	%	$	2,185		5.6	%	$	2,013		0.2	%	$	172
Fixed maturities—non-taxable	4.5	%		62		4.5	%		65		—	%		(3	)	4.6	%		94		4.5	%		96		0.1	%		(2	)
Commercial mortgage loans	6.6	%		259		6.1	%		196		0.5	%		63		6.4	%		385		6.3	%		312		0.1	%		73
Equity securities	13.2	%		14		8.7	%		12		4.5	%		2		13.7	%		20		8.5	%		18		5.2	%		2
Other investments	5.7	%		23		5.6	%		24		0.1	%		(1	)	4.9	%		32		9.1	%		61		(4.2	)%		(29	)
Policy loans	8.9	%		62		8.6	%		53		0.3	%		9		8.8	%		94		8.5	%		80		0.3	%		14
Restricted investments held by securitization entities⁽¹⁾	6.1	%		7		6.6	%		27		(0.5	)%		(20	)	5.4	%		7		6.5	%		39		(1.1	)%		(32	)
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	3.6	%		37		1.7	%		15		1.9	%		22		3.8	%		60		2.0	%		27		1.8	%		33

Gross investment income before expenses and fees	5.8	%		1,914		5.5	%		1,726		0.3	%		188		5.8	%		2,877		5.6	%		2,646		0.2	%		231
Expenses and fees				(37	)				(33	)				(4	)				(56	)				(51	)				(5	)

Net investment income	5.7	%	$	1,877		5.4	%	$	1,693		0.3	%	$	184		5.7	%	$	2,821		5.5	%	$	2,595		0.2	%	$	226

Yields for fixed maturities and equity securities are based on amortized cost and cost, respectively. Yields for securities lending activity, which is included in other investments, are calculated net of the corresponding securities lending liability. All other yields are based on average carrying values.

The increase in overall investment yields was primarily attributable to increased yields on floating rate investments backing spread-based institutional products.

The following table sets forth net investment gains (losses) for the periods presented:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Available-for-sale securities
Realized gains on sale	$	8		$	12		$	30		$	51		$	11		$	35		$	41		$	86
Realized losses on sale		(50	)		(9	)		(76	)		(20	)		(19	)		(10	)		(95	)		(31	)
Loss on derecognition of securitization entities		—			—			(17	)		—			—			—			(17	)		—
Impairments		(4	)		(3	)		(5	)		(37	)		(1	)		(32	)		(6	)		(68	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities		(1	)		—			(1	)		—
Net unrealized losses on trading securities														—			—			(1	)		—
Derivative instruments		(2	)		—			(2	)		—			2			—			—			—
Other														1			—			1			—

Net investment gains (losses)	$	(49	)	$	—		$	(71	)	$	(6	)	$	(6	)	$	(7	)	$	(77	)	$	(13	)

For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we recognized impairments of $1 million and $32 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we recognized impairments of $6 million and $68 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, was $919 million and $251 million, respectively, which was approximately 98% and 97% of book value, respectively. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, was $2,987 million and $1,409 million, respectively, which was approximately 97% and 98% of book value, respectively.

For a discussion of the change in net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Results of Operations.”

The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and invested assets as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2006				December 31, 2005				September 30, 2006				December 31, 2005
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value		% of total		Carrying value		% of total		Carrying value		% of total		Carrying value		% of total
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale
Public	$	38,652	58	%	$	40,539	59	%	$	40,024	58	%	$	40,539	59	%
Private		13,664	21			13,398	19			14,256	20			13,398	19
Commercial mortgage loans		8,203	12			7,558	11			8,315	12			7,558	11
Other invested assets		1,840	3			3,174	5			3,050	5			3,174	5
Policy loans		1,485	2			1,350	2			1,498	2			1,350	2
Restricted investments held by securitization entities		—	—			685	1			—	—			685	1
Equity securities, available-for-sale		187	—			206	—			192	—			206	—
Cash and cash equivalents		2,351	4			1,875	3			2,302	3			1,875	3

Total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets	$	66,382	100	%	$	68,785	100	%	$	69,637	100	%	$	68,785	100	%

The total ~~cash, cash equivalents and invested assets decreased $2.4 billion.~~investment portfolio increased $852 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to cash generated from operating activities, net of cash used for financing activities, which was invested in fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans. This was partially offset by lower net unrealized gains as a result of a higher interest rate environment, the ~~first quarter 2006~~ derecognition of restricted investments held by securitization entities from our consolidated statement of financial position ~~a decrease~~and decreased participation in the securities lending ~~program~~program.

Included in other invested assets are certain securities that are designated as trading and, ~~a reduction~~accordingly, are held at fair value with changes in fair value included in net investment gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statement of income. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of the trading portfolio was $31 million and $15 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2006, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses), and estimated fair value of our fixed maturities and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:

Effective March 16, 2005, we began a ~~result~~repurchase program in which we sell a security at a specified price and agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreement. The market value of ~~a higher interest environment, partially offset by cash generated from operating activities~~securities to be repurchased is monitored and ~~non-recourse funding obligations which was~~collateral levels are adjusted where appropriate to protect the counterparty against credit exposure. Cash received is invested in fixed ~~maturities~~maturities. In the third quarter of 2006 we pledged additional securities of $500 million under our repurchase program. At September 30, 2006, the total fair value of securities pledged under the repurchase program is $833 million and ~~commercial mortgage loans.~~

~~Impairments~~the offsetting repurchase obligation of ~~investment securities~~

~~See note 4~~$798 million is included in ~~our “—Notes to~~other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated ~~Financial Statements.”~~Balance Sheet.

The investment securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2006 consisted of 2,920 securities accounting for unrealized losses of $643 million. Of these unrealized losses 91% were investment grade (rated AAA through BBB-) and 98% were less than 20% below cost. The amount of the unrealized loss on these securities was primarily attributable to increases in interest rates.

Of the investment securities in an unrealized loss position for twelve months or more as of September 30, 2006, 7 securities were 20% or more below cost, including 5 securities, which were also below investment grade (rated BB+ and below). These 5 securities accounted for unrealized losses of $3 million. These securities consisted of 3 issuers primarily in the automotive industry and were current on all terms. The unrealized loss on the automotive investments was primarily caused by deteriorating market share and legacy issues. The automotive issuer continues to maintain significant liquidity relative to its maturity and we currently expect to collect full principal and interest.

As of September 30, 2006, we expect these investments to continue to perform in accordance with their original contractual terms and we have the ability and intent to hold these investment securities until the recovery of the fair value up to the cost of the investment, which may be maturity. Accordingly, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2006. However, from time to time, we may sell securities in the ordinary course of managing our portfolio to meet diversification, credit quality, yield enhancement, asset-liability management and liquidity requirements.

The fair value of derivative instruments, including financial futures, interest rate and foreign currency swaps and equity index options, are based upon pricing valuation models which utilize independent third party data as inputs. The following table sets forth our positions in derivative instruments and the estimated fair values as of the dates indicated. The fair value of derivative instruments, including financial futures, interest rate and foreign currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and equity index options, are based upon quotations obtained from dealers or other reliable sources.indicated:


	June 30, 2006				December 31, 2005				September 30, 2006					December 31, 2005
(Amounts in millions)	Notional value		Estimated fair value		Notional value		Estimated fair value		Notional value		Estimated fair value			Notional value		Estimated fair value
Interest rate swaps	$	11,795	$	222	$	7,894	$	508	$	16,763	$	503		$	7,894	$	508
Foreign currency swaps		533		15		533		4		559		(4	)		533		4
Equity index options		223		20		265		21		281		23			265		21
Financial futures		9		—		27		—		16		—			27		—

Total	$	12,560	$	257	$	8,719	$	533	$	17,619	$	522		$	8,719	$	533

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of derivatives in a gain position and recorded in other invested assets was ~~$286~~$552 million and $559 million, respectively, and the fair value of derivatives in a loss position and recorded in other liabilities was ~~$29~~$30 million and $26 million, respectively.

~~For~~The increase in the ~~three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company entered into~~notional value of derivatives was primarily due to a forward starting interest rate ~~swaps~~swap with a notional value totaling ~~approximately $3.4~~$7.7 billion to hedge the cash flows of forecasted transactions related to our long-term care business within our Protection segment. In addition, ~~for the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company~~we entered into interest rate swaps with notional value of ~~$600 million~~$0.9 billion to convert fixed rate liabilities into floating rate liabilities ~~to improve~~consistent with the overall asset-liability management for our FABN business within our Retirement Income and Investments segment.

Liquidity and capital resources represent our overall financial strength and our ability to generate strong cash flows from our businesses, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.

The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30:


(Amounts in millions)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Net cash from operating activities	$	1,997		$	1,363		$	3,350		$	2,424
Net cash from investing activities		(752	)		(1,039	)		(1,554	)		(2,855	)
Net cash from financing activities		(760	)		(708	)		(1,351	)		339

Net increase (decrease) in cash less foreign exchange effect							$	445		$	(92	)

Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums received, fees received, investment income and expenses paid. Principal sources of cash include sales of our products and services. The increase in cash flows from operating activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 was primarily the result of increases in our long-term care insurance reserves due to normal aging of the in-force block, growth of our international mortgage insurance unearned premium reserves and tax payments made in 2005 that did not recur in 2006.

As an insurance business, we typically generate positive cash flows from operating activities, as premiums and deposits collected from our insurance and investment products exceed policy acquisition costs, benefits paid and redemptions. These positive cash flows are then invested to support the obligations of our insurance and investment products and required capital supporting these products. Accordingly, in analyzing our cash flow we focus on the change in the amount of cash available and used in investing activities.

The increase in net cash from investing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2005, was primarily the result of an increased level of proceeds from fixed maturities and sale of investments offset by purchases caused primarily by cash from the issuances of non-recourse funding obligations and commercial paper borrowings. The cash provided by these issuances was partially offset by investment proceeds used to provide for the net redemptions of our investment contracts.

Changes in cash from financing activities primarily relate to the issuance and repayment of borrowings, dividends to our stockholders and other capital transactions, as well as the issuance of, and redemptions and benefit payments on, investment contracts. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, cash from financing activities included net redemptions on investment contracts of ~~$1,053~~$1,811 million and cash used for the acquisition of treasury stock of ~~$553~~$675 million, partially offset by ~~an issuance of $750 million in non-recourse funding obligations, and~~ $143 million ofprovided by commercial paper borrowings.

Total assets were ~~$103.6~~$107.8 billion as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, compared to $105.7 billion as of December 31, 2005. The ~~decrease~~increase in total assets was driven primarily by ~~a decrease in other invested assets due to a reduction in the participation in our securities lending program and~~deferred acquisition costs, fixed maturity securities, ~~attributable to lower fair values in the current interest rate environment. These increases were offset by increased balances in~~ commercial mortgage loans and cash and cash equivalents driven primarily by normal business growth. Total liabilities were ~~$91.4~~$94.5 billion as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, compared to $92.3 billion as of December 31, 2005. The ~~decrease~~increase in total liabilities was primarily driven by a decrease in other liabilities primarily due to a reduction in the participation in our securities lending program and a decrease in future annuity and contract benefits due to net redemptions of our investment contracts, partially offset by an increase in our long-term care insurance ~~from~~reserves due to normal aging of the in-force ~~block. These decreases are partially offset by an increase in~~block, growth of our international mortgage insurance and issuances of non-recourse funding ~~obligations~~obligations.

Effective March 16, 2005, we began a repurchase program in which we sell a security at a specified price and ~~short-term borrowings.~~agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. Repurchase agreements are treated as collaterized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreement. The market value of securities to be repurchased is monitored and collateral levels are adjusted where appropriate to protect the counterparty against credit exposure. Cash received is invested in fixed maturities. In the third quarter of 2006 we pledged additional securities under our repurchase program. At September 30, 2006, the fair value of securities pledged under the repurchase program totaled $833 million and the offsetting repurchase obligation of $798 million is included in other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

We conduct all our operations through our operating subsidiaries. Dividends from our subsidiaries and permitted payments to us under our tax sharing arrangements with our subsidiaries are our principal sources of cash to pay stockholder dividends and to meet our holding company obligations, including payments of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness.

Our primary uses of funds at our holding company level include payment of general operating expenses, payment of principal, interest and other expenses related to holding company debt, payment of dividends on our common and preferred stock, amounts we owe to GE under the Tax Matters Agreement, contract adjustment payments on our Equity Units, contributions to subsidiaries, and, potentially, acquisitions.

Our holding company had ~~$142~~$223 million and $332 million of cash and cash equivalents as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

In the first ~~quarter~~and second quarters of 2006, we declared common stock dividends of $34 million and $35 million, respectively, which were paid in the second ~~quarter~~and third quarters of ~~2006.~~2006, respectively. During the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006, we raised the quarterly dividend by 20% to $0.09 a share from $0.075 a share. In addition, we declared dividends on our common stock of ~~$35~~$40 million, which will be paid during the ~~third~~fourth quarter of 2006. The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on many factors including our receipt of dividends from our insurance and other operating subsidiaries, financial condition, ~~earnings,~~net income, capital requirements of our subsidiaries, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors as the board of directors deems relevant. In addition, our Series A Preferred Stock bears dividends at an annual rate of 5.25% of the liquidation value of $50 per share. We also pay quarterly contract adjustment payments with respect to our Equity Units at an annual rate of 2.16% of the stated amount of $25 per Equity Unit.

During the quarter, we repurchased ~~2.2~~3.6 million shares at a weighted average price of ~~$33.24.~~$34.43. Under the share repurchase program approved by our board of directors in December 2005, we ~~have~~had the authority to repurchase an additional ~~$197~~$75 million. Additionally, on October 26, 2006, our Board of Directors increased the size of the stock repurchase program to $1.0 billion, an increase of $250 million, ~~which is expected~~raising our remaining repurchase capacity to ~~be completed by year-end.~~$325 million.

Insurance companies domiciled in the United States are restricted by various state insurance laws as to the amount of dividends that may be paid within any twelve consecutive month period without regulatory consent. Dividend restriction laws in Virginia and North Carolina, states in which Genworth has domiciled regulated insurance entities, changed effective July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In both states, the insurance laws changed to “greater of” from “lesser of” provisions, wherein the maximum amount that can be paid within a twelve-month period without prior approval by the Insurance Commissioner of the state is limited to the greater of (a) 10% of the insurance company’s capital and surplus as of the prior December 31 or (b) net gains from operations (for life insurance companies) or net income, excluding realized investment gains (for property and casualty insurance companies) for the twelve-month period ending on the prior December 31. We believe these changes will enhance holding company liquidity. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, we received dividends from our insurance subsidiaries of ~~$383 million.~~$247 million, of which $243 million was received from our principal domestic mortgage insurance subsidiary during the third quarter of 2006.

In addition to dividends from our insurance subsidiaries, our other sources of funds include service fees we receive from GE, payments from our subsidiaries pursuant to tax sharing arrangements, proceeds from any additional issuances of commercial paper and borrowings pursuant to our revolving credit facilities.

The liquidity requirements of our regulated insurance subsidiaries principally relate to the liabilities associated with their various insurance and investment products, operating costs and expenses, the payment of dividends to us, contributions to their subsidiaries, payment of principal and interest on their outstanding debt obligations and income taxes. Liabilities arising from insurance and investment products include the payment of benefits, as well as cash payments in connection with policy surrenders and withdrawals, policy loans and obligations to redeem funding agreements under applicable put option provisions.

Historically, our insurance subsidiaries have used cash flow from operations and sales of investment securities to fund their liquidity requirements. Our insurance subsidiaries’ principal cash inflows from operating activities derive from premiums, annuity deposits and policy and contract fees and other income, including commissions, cost of insurance, mortality, expense and surrender charges, contract underwriting fees, investment management fees, and dividends and distributions from their subsidiaries. The principal cash inflows from investment activities result from repayments of principal, sales of invested assets and investment income.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, we had approximately $2.7 billion of renewable floating rate funding agreements, which are deposit-type products that generally credit interest on deposits at a floating rate tied to an external market index. Purchasers of renewable funding agreements include money market funds, bank common trust funds and other short-term investors. Some of our funding agreements contain “put” provisions, through which the contractholder has an option to terminate the funding agreement for any reason after giving notice within the

contract’s specified notice period, which is generally 90 days or 180 days. Of the $2.7 billion aggregate amount outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, $875 million had put option features including $425 million with put options features of 90 days and $450 million with put options of 180 days.

Our insurance subsidiaries maintain investment strategies intended to provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. Products having liabilities with longer durations, such as certain life insurance and long-term care insurance policies, are matched with investments having similar estimated lives such as long-term fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans. Shorter-term liabilities are matched with fixed maturities that have short- and medium-term fixed maturities. In addition, our insurance subsidiaries hold highly liquid, high-quality short-term investment securities and other liquid investment-grade fixed maturities to fund anticipated operating expenses, surrenders, and withdrawals. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, our total cash and invested assets was ~~$66.4~~$69.6 billion. Our investments in privately placed fixed maturities, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans and limited partnership interests are relatively illiquid. These asset classes represented approximately 35% of the carrying value of our total cash and invested assets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006.

During 2005, certain of our domestic life insurance subsidiaries transferred primarily foreign-issued investment securities to an affiliated special purpose entity (“SPE”) which is a subsidiary in our Mortgage Insurance segment and consolidated in our financial statements and whose sole purpose is to securitize these investment securities and issue secured notes to various affiliated insurance companies. The securitized investments are owned in their entirety ~~but~~by the SPE and are not available to satisfy the claims of our creditors. These securitized investments provide collateral to the notes issued by the SPE to the insurance companies. The value of those securities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 was $1.5 billion.

On May 25, 2006 we entered into a $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility, which matures in May 2011, replacing our $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to mature in May 2009. We also have a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility that matures in April 2010. These facilities bear variable interest rates based on a one-month LIBOR plus margin. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, we utilized ~~$170~~$171 million of the commitment under these facilities for the issuance of a letter of credit for the benefit of one of our Mortgage Insurance subsidiaries.

On January 20, 2006, River Lake Insurance Company III (“River Lake III”), a special purpose financial captive insurance company wholly owned by First Colony Life Insurance Company (“First Colony”), ~~itself an~~our indirect wholly owned subsidiary ~~of Genworth~~, issued $750 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate surplus notes due 2036 (the ~~“Notes”~~“RL III Notes”). River Lake III has received regulatory approval to issue additional series of its floating rate surplus notes up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion (including the RL III Notes), but is under no obligation to do so.

On September 22, 2006, River Lake Insurance Company (“River Lake I”), a special purpose captive insurance company wholly owned by First Colony, our indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $300 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate surplus notes due 2033 (the “RL I Notes”). River Lake I previously received approval from the Director of Insurance of the State of South Carolina (the “Director”) on July 23, 2003 to issue up to an aggregate amount of $1.2 billion of its floating rate surplus notes and has issued an aggregate of $1.1 billion to date (including the RL I Notes). Despite having additional capacity, River Lake I does not expect to issue any additional notes.

On October 24, 2006, Rivermont Life Insurance Company I (“Rivermont I”), a special purpose financial captive insurance company wholly owned by First Colony, itself an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $315 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate surplus notes due 2050 (the “Rivermont I Notes”). Rivermont I has received regulatory approval to issue additional series of its floating rate surplus notes up to an aggregate principal amount of $475 million (including the Rivermont I Notes), but is under no obligation to do so. The Rivermont I Notes are direct financial obligations of ~~River Lake III~~Rivermont I and are not guaranteed by First Colony or Genworth.

The Rivermont I Notes were issued by ~~River Lake III~~Rivermont I to fund statutory reserves ~~required by the~~for policies subject to Valuation of Life Insurance Policies ~~Regulation. River Lake III~~Regulation (more commonly known as “Regulation XXX”), as clarified by Actuarial Guideline 38 (more commonly known as “AXXX”) and its predecessor regulations. Rivermont I has reinsured ~~on a coinsurance basis~~ from First Colony, on a combination coinsurance and modified coinsurance basis, certain ~~term~~universal life insurance policies ~~having guaranteed level premiums.~~ with secondary guarantees written or reinsured by First Colony. Genworth has agreed to provide a limited guaranty to Rivermont I to mitigate certain interest rate risks associated with this reinsurance. First Colony has also agreed to indemnify Rivermont I for certain limited costs.

The Notes have been sold to a third-party for deposit into certain Delaware trusts (the “Trusts”) that will issue money market or term ~~securities. The principal and interest payments due on the money market and term~~ securities ~~will be insured by a third party insurance company.~~(the “Securities”). The holders of the Rivermont I Notes cannot require repayment from Genworth or any of its subsidiaries, other than ~~River Lake III,~~Rivermont I, the direct issuer of the Rivermont I Notes. ~~First Colony~~Genworth has also agreed, under certain circumstances, to ~~indemnify River Lake III and~~provide to the ~~third party insurer for~~Trusts a certain ~~limited costs. River Lake III~~amount of liquidity in the event that the Trusts do not have sufficient funds available to fully redeem the Securities at the stated maturity date.

Rivermont I will pay interest on the principal amount of the Rivermont I Notes on a monthly basis, subject to regulatory approval. Any payment of principal of, including by redemption, or interest on the Rivermont I Notes may only be made with the prior approval of the Director of Insurance of the State of South Carolina in accordance with the terms of its licensing order and in accordance with applicable law. The holders of the Rivermont I Notes have no rights to accelerate payment of principal of the Rivermont I Notes under any circumstances, including without limitation, for nonpayment or breach of any covenant. ~~River Lake III~~Rivermont I reserves the right to repay the Rivermont I Notes at any time, subject to the terms of the Rivermont I Notes and prior regulatory approval. ~~In addition, we continue to~~

~~work towards the the execution of a capital management strategy for our universal life business which could result in the issuance of additional non-recourse funding obligations.~~

On December 21, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, authorizing Genworth to repurchase up to $750 million of our common stock over the succeeding 18 months. Additionally, on October 26, 2006, our Board of Directors increased the size of the stock repurchase program to $1.0 billion, an increase of $250 million. We expect the purchases to be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, and will be funded from cash and/or the proceeds from issuance of debt securities.

Concurrently with GE’s secondary offering of our Class A Common Stock completed in March 2006, we repurchased 15 million shares of our Class B Common Stock directly from GE, which were automatically converted to Class A Common Stock upon the transfer of these shares to us, for an aggregate price of $479 million. We financed the stock repurchase with $250 million cash available at the holding company and the proceeds of the issuance of $229 million in commercial paper under our existing commercial paper program.

During the second quarter of 2006, we repurchased 2.2 million shares of our Class A Common Stock at an average market price of ~~$33.26~~$33.24 per share for an aggregate price of $74 million. During the third quarter of 2006,

we repurchased 3.6 million shares of our Class A Common Stock at an average market price of $34.43 per share for an aggregate price of approximately $122 million. We financed these repurchases with cash available at the holding company.

We believe our cash flows from operation, further issuances under our commercial paper program and revolving credit facilities will provide us with sufficient liquidity to meet our operating requirements for the foreseeable future.

We enter into obligations to third-parties in the ordinary course of our operations. However, we do not believe that our cash flow requirements can be assessed based upon an analysis of these obligations. The most significant factor affecting our future cash flows is our ability to earn and collect cash from our customers. Future cash outflows, whether they are contractual obligations or not, also will vary based upon our future needs. Although some outflows are fixed, others depend on future events. Examples of fixed obligations include our obligations to pay principal and interest on fixed-rate borrowings. Examples of obligations that will vary include obligations to pay interest on variable-rate borrowings and insurance liabilities that depend on future interest rates and market performance. Many of our obligations are linked to cash-generating contracts. These obligations include payments to contractholders that assume those contractholders will continue to make deposits in accordance with the terms of their contracts. In addition, our operations involve significant expenditures that are not based upon “commitments.” These include expenditures for income taxes and payroll.

During the second quarter of 2006, we agreed to acquire ~~Vero LMI and~~ AssetMark, as further described in note 54 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”

During 2006, we issued ~~$750 million~~$1.05 billion in non-recourse funding obligations, and $229 million of commercial paper borrowings as further described in note 87 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”

There have been no other material additions or changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as set forth in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

During the first quarter of 2006, we derecognized securitization entity balances of $685 million, $44 million, $660 million and $15 million of restricted investments held by securitization entities, other assets, borrowings related to securitization entities and other liabilities, respectively. We continue to hold a retained interest in the form of interest-only strips. We recognized a loss on sale of $11 million, net of tax, from this re-securitization transaction. See note 98 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”

~~On January 1, 2006, we~~ and not yet adopted ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R,~~~~Share-Based Payment~~~~, an amendment of SFAS No. 123,~~~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation~~. We adopted SFAS No. 123R under the modified prospective transition method. The statement requires companies to recognize the grant-date fair value of options and other equity-based awards within the income statement over the respective vesting period of the awards. We adopted SFAS No. 123 effective January 1, 2002 and, as permitted, we determined a grant date fair value using a Black-Scholes model and recognized the related compensation expense through the income statement for all equity awards issued subsequent to January 1, 2002. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we will continue to recognize the remaining portion of the requisite service under previously granted unvested awards including those awards granted prior to January 1, 2002. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we adjusted compensation cost related to forfeiture of awards when the actual forfeiture occurred. SFAS No. 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates and requires companies which previously accounted for forfeitures on an occurrence basis to include in income of the period of adoption a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the adjustment to reflect estimated forfeitures for prior periods. On January 1, 2006, we recognized an increase to net earnings of $4 million related to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. Seestandards, see note 62 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”

~~As of January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 155,~~~~Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments~~~~. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133,~~~~Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~~~, and SFAS No. 140,~~~~Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities~~. SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole, eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host, if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. In addition, among other changes, SFAS No. 155 (i) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133; (ii) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (iii) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and (iv) eliminates the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial interest. Adoption of SFAS No. 155 did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~In September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 05-1,~~~~Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection With Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts.~~This statement provides guidance on accounting for deferred acquisition costs and other deferred balances on an internal replacement, defined broadly as a modification in product benefits, features, rights, or coverages that occurs by the exchange of an existing contract for a new contract, or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to an existing contract, or by the election of a benefit, feature, right, or coverage within an existing contract. Depending on the type of modification, the period over which these deferred balances will be recognized could be accelerated. SOP 05-1 is effective for internal replacements occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact that SOP 05-1 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

~~In July 2006, FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48,~~~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes~~ was issued. This guidance clarifies what criteria must be met prior to recognition of the financial statement benefit of a position taken in a tax return. Additionally, it applies to the recognition and measurement of income tax uncertainties resulting from a purchase business combination. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact FIN No. 48 will have on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Market risk is the risk of the loss of fair value resulting from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. Market risk is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying financial instruments are traded. There were no material changes in these risks since December 31, 2005.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of Genworth’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During the Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We face a significant risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including the risk of class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance operations, we are, have been, or may become subject to class actions and individual suits alleging, among other things, issues relating to sales or underwriting practices, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, claims payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, administration, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, recommending unsuitable products to customers, that our pricing structures and business practices in our mortgage insurance business, such as captive reinsurance arrangements with lenders and contract underwriting services, violate RESPA or related state anti-inducement laws, and breaching fiduciary or other duties to customers. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In our investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving commercial disputes with counterparties. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities such as our contractual and employment relationships. We are also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas and books and record examinations, from state, federal and international regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Except as described below, there were no material developments during the quarter in any of the legal proceedings identified in Part 1, Item 3 of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly ~~period~~periods ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006. In addition, there were no new material legal proceedings during the quarter.

As previously identified, the U.K. antitrust authorities are conducting a review of the payment protection insurance sector in the United Kingdom. The review is in response to a complaint lodged under U.K. anti-trust law by a consumer activist group (the Citizens Advice Bureau). In October 2006, the antitrust authorities published their provisional findings which concluded that there are features of the payment protection insurance market which may be adversely affecting competition. Accordingly, the U.K. antitrust authorities are recommending that a more detailed review of the payment protection insurance market can be carried out. The U.K. antitrust authorities are currently consulting with industry participants on their provisional findings and are expected to issue their final report in the first quarter of 2007. We are participating in the consultation process.

Also as previously identified, the Financial Services Authority in the U.K. conducted an industry-wide review of payment protection insurance products in 2005. The Financial Services Authority has recently completed a further review of payment protection insurance products. Although the Financial Services Authority concluded that there have been improvements since 2005, the Financial Services Authority identified a number of areas of concern, in particular relating to sales practices. During 2007, the Financial Services Authority intends to examine whether additional regulation of payment protection insurance products is required.

In additional, as previously identified, in January 2006, as part of an industry-wide review, our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiary received an administrative subpoena from the Minnesota Department of Commerce with respect to our reinsurance arrangements, including captive reinsurance transactions. During the third quarter of 2006, we received a follow-up industry-wide request from Minnesota for additional information, and we have responded.

We cannot assure that the above, or previously identified investigations and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, it is possible that

related investigations and proceedings may be commenced in the future, and we could become subject to further investigations and have lawsuits filed against us. In addition, increased regulatory scrutiny and any resulting investigations or proceedings could result in new legal precedents and industry-wide regulations or practices that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.

As previously identified, one of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries is named as a defendant in two lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, William Portis et al. v. GE Mortgage Insurance Corp. and Karwo v. Citimortgage, Inc. and General Electric Mortgage Insurance Corporation. The Portis complaint was filed on January 15, 2004, and the Karwo complaint was filed on March 15, 2004. Each action seeks certification of a nationwide class of consumers who allegedly were required to pay for our private mortgage insurance at a rate higher than our “best available rate,” based upon credit information we obtained. Each action alleges that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) requires notice to such borrowers and that we violated the FCRA by failing to give such notice. The plaintiffs in Portis allege in the complaint that they are entitled to “actual damages” and “damages within the Court’s discretion of not more than $1,000 for each separate violation” of the FCRA. The plaintiffs in Karwo allege that they are entitled to “appropriate actual, punitive and statutory damages” and “such other or further relief as the Court deems proper.” Similar cases were filed against six other mortgage insurers. We have vigorously denied liability with respect to plaintiffs’ allegations. Nevertheless, to avoid the risks and costs associated with protracted litigation and to resolve our differences with consumers, our mortgage insurance subsidiary reached an agreement to settle the cases on a nationwide class action basis. ~~The settlement documents have been finalized, and were submitted to~~At a hearing on October 16, 2006, the Court ~~for preliminary approval on July 14, 2006. At an April 25, 2006 conference, the Court was advised of the general~~

~~terms of the settlement and set September 25, 2006 as the tentative date for a hearing to determine whether to give~~gave final approval to the settlement. ~~We now anticipate that the final approval hearing will take place in October 2006.~~ In the fourth quarter of 2005, upon reaching an initial agreement in principle with respect to the settlement, an accrual was established representing our best estimate of the cost of the settlement. The precise amount of payments in this matter cannot be estimated because they are dependent ~~upon Court approval of the class and related settlement,~~ the number of individuals who ultimately will seek relief in the claim form process of ~~any approved~~the class settlement, the identity of such claimants and whether they are entitled to relief under the settlement terms.

As previously identified, one of our mortgage insurance subsidiaries is ~~named as~~involved in an arbitration regarding our delegated underwriting practices. A mortgage lender that underwrote loan applications for mortgage insurance under our delegated underwriting program commenced the arbitration against us in 2003 after we rescinded policy coverage for a ~~defendant~~number of mortgage loans underwritten by that lender. We rescinded coverage because we believe those loans were not underwritten in ~~a lawsuit,~~~~Wilma Juanita Kern, et al. v. General Electric Capital Assurance Company,~~~~filed on February 16,~~compliance with applicable program standards and underwriting guidelines. However, the lender claims that we improperly rescinded coverage. In addition to seeking reinstatement of coverage, attorney’s fees and punitive damages are sought. The first phase of the arbitration covering 30 loans was held in January 2005 in the Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit in Madison County, Illinois. The plaintiffs seek to proceed on the basis of a class action, brought on behalf of Illinois purchasers of long-term care insurance. Plaintiffs allege the improper refusal to provide long-term care benefits to long-term care insureds who were cared for in unlicensed facilities in Illinois, and the improper sale of policies requiring insureds to reside in licensed assisted care facilities during a time period when no licensed facilities, or too few licensed facilities were available in Illinois. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages for breach of contract, violationpanel ordered that 28 of the ~~Illinois Consumer Fraud Act~~loans be reinstated. The second phase covering 33 loans was held in July 2005 and ~~unjust enrichment.~~the arbitration panel ordered reinstatement of coverage on 5 of the 33 loans. We agreed to a recess of the third phase of arbitration to determine if any settlement could be effected. In ~~May~~March 2006, an agreement in principle to settle this ~~case on an individual basis~~matter was ~~reached, and we~~reached. The settlement was finalized in a written settlement agreement dated July 31, 2006. Previously established reserves are inadequate to cover the ~~process of documenting a proposed~~expected settlement ~~agreement.~~costs.

The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained in Item 1A of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The annual meeting of stockholders of Genworth Financial, Inc. was held on May 17, 2006. Stockholders elected for the ensuing year all of the director nominees and ratified the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2006.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		33-1073076
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6620 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia		23230
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Earnings~~Income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)		3

Condensed Consolidated ~~Statements of Financial Position~~Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2005		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)		6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2018

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		6471

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		6472

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		6573

Item 1A. Risk Factors		6775

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		67

~~Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~		6775

Item 6. Exhibits		6875

Signatures		6976


(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value
Fixed maturities:
U.S. government, agencies and government sponsored entities	$	695	$	10	$	(17	)	$	688
Tax exempt		2,763		56		(16	)		2,803
Government—non U.S.		1,833		33		(24	)		1,842
U.S. corporate		24,816		357		(775	)		24,398
Corporate—non U.S.		9,716		115		(270	)		9,561
Mortgage and asset-backed		13,200		96		(272	)		13,024

Total fixed maturities		53,023		667		(1,374	)		52,316
Equity securities		161		29		(3	)		187

Total available-for-sale securities	$	53,184	$	696	$	(1,377	)	$	52,503


(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value
Fixed maturities:
U.S. government, agencies and government sponsored entities	$	777	$	32	$	(4	)	$	805
Tax exempt		2,797		97		(4	)		2,890
Government—non U.S.		1,736		74		(4	)		1,806
U.S. corporate		25,378		975		(231	)		26,122
Corporate—non U.S.		9,168		306		(84	)		9,390
Mortgage and asset-backed		12,926		140		(142	)		12,924

Total fixed maturities		52,782		1,624		(469	)		53,937
Equity securities		173		36		(3	)		206

Total available-for-sale securities	$	52,955	$	1,660	$	(472	)	$	54,143


	Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or more
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Estimated fair value		Gross unrealized losses			# of securities	Estimated fair value		Gross unrealized losses			# of securities
Description of Securities
Fixed maturities:
U.S. government, agencies and government sponsored entities	$	325	$	(14	)	82	$	86	$	(3	)	17
Tax exempt		868		(12	)	204		146		(4	)	49
Government—non U.S.		1,017		(23	)	186		29		(1	)	8
U.S. corporate		12,575		(618	)	1,184		2,670		(157	)	323
Corporate—non U.S.		5,584		(203	)	678		1,101		(67	)	115
Mortgage and asset backed		6,129		(193	)	680		1,848		(79	)	296

Subtotal, fixed maturities		26,498		(1,063	)	3,014		5,880		(311	)	808
Equity securities		—		—		—		27		(3	)	13

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	26,498	$	(1,063	)	3,014	$	5,907	$	(314	)	821


% Below cost—fixed maturities:
<20% Below cost	$	26,466	$	(1,050	)	3,008	$	5,820	$	(290	)	794
20-50% Below cost		31		(11	)	3		59		(20	)	13
>50% Below cost		1		(2	)	3		1		(1	)	1

Total fixed maturities		26,498		(1,063	)	3,014		5,880		(311	)	808


% Below cost—equity securities:
<20% Below cost		—		—		—		27		(3	)	13
20-50% Below cost		—		—		—		—		—		—
>50% Below cost		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total equity securities		—		—		—		27		(3	)	13

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	26,498	$	(1,063	)	3,014	$	5,907	$	(314	)	821


Investment grade	$	25,148	$	(1,006	)	2,716	$	5,414	$	(274	)	721
Below investment grade		1,321		(56	)	295		482		(38	)	90
Not Rated—Fixed maturities		29		(1	)	3		—		—		—
Not Rated—Equities		—		—		—		11		(2	)	10

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	26,498	$	(1,063	)	3,014	$	5,907	$	(314	)	821


~~Large accelerated filer~~ x		~~Accelerated filer~~ ¨		~~Non-accelerated filer~~ ¨


		Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions except for per share data)		2006		2005		2006		2005
Basic earnings per common share:
Net earnings before accounting change		$	0.70	$	0.61	$	1.40	$	1.27
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes			—		—		0.01		—

Basic earnings per common share	��	$	0.70	$	0.61	$	1.41	$	1.27

Diluted earnings per common share:
Net earnings before accounting change		$	0.68	$	0.60	$	1.37	$	1.25
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes			—		—		0.01		—

Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.68	$	0.60	$	1.37	$	1.25

Weighted-average shares used in basic earnings per common share calculations			455.8		470.4		461.3		479.6
Dilutive securities:
Stock purchase contracts underlying equity units			7.5		4.4		7.5		4.0
Stock options and stock appreciation rights			4.5		2.2		4.6		1.9
Restricted stock units			0.5		0.4		0.5		0.4

Weighted-average shares used in diluted earnings per common share calculations			468.3		477.4		473.9		485.9


Period	Total number of shares (or units) purchased	Average price paid per share (or unit)		Total number of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs⁽¹⁾
April 1, 2006 through April 30, 2006	—	$	—	—	$	271,000,000
May 1, 2006 through May 31, 2006	1,048,500	$	33.16	1,048,500		236,203,268
June 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006	1,164,000	$	33.30	1,164,000		197,405,914

Total	2,212,500	$	33.24	2,212,500	$	197,405,914


	Votes received	Votes withheld
Frank J. Borelli	402,877,748	2,421,057
Michael D. Fraizer	400,754,993	4,543,812
Nancy J. Karch	402,910,140	2,388,665
J. Robert “Bob” Kerrey	403,209,494	2,089,311
Saiyid T. Naqvi	403,219,914	2,078,891
James A. Parke	403,210,926	2,087,879
James S. Riepe	403,222,623	2,076,182
Thomas B. Wheeler	402,894,384	2,404,421


10.52.7		Sub-Plan under the 2004 Genworth Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan: Genworth Financial U.K. Share Incentive Plan

12		Statement of Ratio of ~~Earnings~~Income to Fixed Charges

31.1		Certification of Michael D. Fraizer

31.2		Certification of ~~Richard P. McKenney~~Victor C. Moses

32.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code—Michael D. Fraizer

32.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code—~~Richard P. McKenney~~Victor C. Moses

Votes cast

Management Proposal

Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2006.