(former name former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x

At ~~November 1, 2006~~April 30, 2007 there were ~~49,104,908~~49,881,068 outstanding Common Shares of the registrant.


	September 30, 2006			June 30, 2006			March 31, 2007			June 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	111,224		$	107,354		$	159,683		$	107,354
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,730 as of September 30, 2006 and $2,736 as of June 30, 2006 (note 9)		76,668			75,016
Income taxes recoverable		12,788			11,924
Accounts receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,959 as of March 31, 2007 and $2,736 as of June 30, 2006 (note 10)								113,737			75,016
Income taxes recoverable (note 13)								—			11,924
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,752			8,520			12,262			8,428
Deferred tax assets (note 12)		15,083			28,724
Deferred tax assets (note 13)								25,122			28,724

Total current assets		223,515			231,538			310,804			231,446
Investments in marketable securities (note 3)		21,127			21,025			—			21,025
Capital assets (note 4)		39,746			41,262			45,361			41,262
Goodwill (note 5)		233,965			235,523			526,636			235,523
Acquired intangible assets (note 6)		94,753			102,326			362,115			102,326
Deferred tax assets (note 12)		47,010			37,185
Deferred tax assets (note 13)								53,562			37,185
Other assets		5,276			2,234			9,318			2,326

	$	665,392		$	671,093		$	1,307,796		$	671,093

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 7)	$	56,352		$	62,535		$	99,187		$	62,535
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8)		408			405			4,305			405
Deferred revenues		71,334			74,687			142,771			74,687
Deferred tax liabilities (note 12)		12,616			12,183
Income taxes payable (note 13)								22,192			—
Deferred tax liabilities (note 13)								5,790			12,183

Total current liabilities		140,710			149,810			274,245			149,810
Long-term liabilities:
Accrued liabilities (note 7)		19,162			21,121			18,880			21,121
Long-term debt (note 8)		12,802			12,963			396,334			12,963
Deferred revenues		3,966			3,534			4,051			3,534
Deferred tax liabilities (note 12)		16,611			19,490
Deferred tax liabilities (note 13)								107,928			19,490

Total long-term liabilities		52,541			57,108			527,193			57,108
Minority interest		6,025			5,804			6,299			5,804
Shareholders’ equity:
Share capital (note 10)
49,027,823 and 48,935,042 Common Shares issued and outstanding at September 30 and June 30, 2006, respectively; Authorized Common Shares: unlimited		415,079			414,475
Share capital (note 11)
49,810,068 and 48,935,042 Common Shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively; Authorized Common Shares: unlimited								423,381			414,475
Additional paid-in capital		29,838			28,367			33,626			28,367
Accumulated other comprehensive income		41,023			42,654			56,746			42,654
Accumulated deficit		(19,824	)		(27,125	)		(13,694	)		(27,125	)

Total shareholders’ equity		466,116			458,371			500,059			458,371

	$	665,392		$	671,093		$	1,307,796		$	671,093

Commitments and Contingencies (note 15)
Subsequent Events (note 18)
Commitments and Contingencies (note 16)

See accompanying unaudited notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


	Three months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2007			2006			2007			2006
Revenues:
License	$	28,825		$	24,943		$	43,032		$	28,415		$	123,282		$	90,489
Customer support		48,288			45,324			79,042			45,966			205,352			136,656
Service		24,042			22,363			33,978			26,545			91,834			77,182

Total revenues		101,155			92,630			156,052			100,926			420,468			304,327
Cost of revenues:
License		2,800			2,388			3,515			3,900			9,637			8,099
Customer support		6,731			7,029			12,431			7,103			31,821			21,595
Service		19,862			19,035			28,042			19,840			77,012			61,848
Amortization of acquired technology intangible assets		4,846			4,631			10,433			4,730			25,675			14,013

Total cost of revenues		34,239			33,083			54,421			35,573			144,145			105,555

		66,916			59,547			101,631			65,353			276,323			198,772
Operating expenses:
Research and development		14,179			15,745			21,176			14,153			57,950			44,824
Sales and marketing		24,557			24,901			39,069			24,677			107,450			78,562
General and administrative		12,267			12,646			15,947			11,210			43,688			33,298
Depreciation		2,992			2,509			3,626			2,694			10,525			8,034
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		2,382			2,222			7,396			2,298			17,147			6,825
Special charges (recoveries) (note 16)		(468	)		18,111
Special charges (recoveries) (note 17)								878			(557	)		5,253			26,347

Total operating expenses		55,909			76,134			88,092			54,475			242,013			197,890

Income (loss) from operations		11,007			(16,587	)
Income from operations								13,539			10,878			34,310			882
Other income (expense)		373			(524	)		(98	)		(1,554	)		604			(3,318	)
Interest income, net		392			70
Interest income (expense), net								(7,550	)		685			(14,670	)		1,001

Income (loss) before income taxes		11,772			(17,041	)		5,891			10,009			20,244			(1,435	)
Provision for (recovery) of income taxes		4,334			(4,370	)
Provision for income taxes								1,914			2,558			6,421			928

Net income (loss) before minority interest		7,438			(12,671	)		3,977			7,451			13,823			(2,363	)
Minority interest		137			197			124			129			392			462

Net income (loss) for the period	$	7,301		$	(12,868	)	$	3,853		$	7,322		$	13,431		$	(2,825	)

Net income (loss) per share – basic (note 11)	$	0.15		$	(0.27	)
Net income (loss) per share—basic (note 12)							$	0.08		$	0.15		$	0.27		$	(0.06	)

Net income (loss) per share – diluted (note 11)	$	0.15		$	(0.27	)
Net income (loss) per share—diluted (note 12)							$	0.08		$	0.15		$	0.26		$	(0.06	)

Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding – basic		48,975			48,439
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding – diluted		50,219			48,439
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding
Basic								49,490			48,762			49,203			48,590

Diluted								51,134			50,260			50,703			48,590

See accompanying unaudited notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


	Three months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2007			2006			2007			2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) for the period	$	7,301		$	(12,868	)	$	3,853		$	7,322		$	13,431		$	(2,825	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		10,220			9,362			21,455			9,722			53,347			28,872
Share-based compensation expense		1,267			1,413			1,261			1,143			3,861			3,886
Undistributed earnings related to minority interest		137			197			124			129			392			462
Amortization of debt issuance costs								274			—			531			—
Unrealized loss on financial instruments (note 9)								364			—			576			—
Deferred taxes		1,714			(5,358	)		(14,270	)		2,272			(23,194	)		(3,773	)
Impairment of capital assets		—			2,013			—			150			—			3,817
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,694	)		8,785			3,550			3,360			27,047			8,826
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		617			(2,031	)		(212	)		379			682			(549	)
Income taxes		(1,159	)		(668	)		1,173			(110	)		(3,381	)		(1,823	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(5,523	)		4,791			(4,777	)		(12,647	)		(9,690	)		(1,300	)
Deferred revenues		(2,962	)		(6,496	)
Deferred revenue								28,326			16,554			14,889			7,350
Other assets		(281	)		1,138			221			425			3,916			2,428

Net cash provided by operating activities		9,637			278			41,342			28,699			82,407			45,371

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of capital assets		(2,785	)		(5,937	)
Acquisition of capital assets								(729	)		(2,729	)		(4,620	)		(16,826	)
Additional purchase consideration for prior period acquisitions		—			(3,313	)		—			—			(856	)		(3,369	)
Purchase of IXOS, net of cash acquired		(333	)		(3,107	)		(219	)		(423	)		(1,086	)		(4,651	)
Purchase of Hummingbird, net of cash acquired								—			—			(384,761	)		—
Purchase of Momentum, net of cash acquired								(4,076	)		—			(4,076	)		—
Investments in marketable securities		(829	)		—			—			—			(829	)		—
Acquisition related costs		(2,448	)		(999	)		(8,049	)		(1,750	)		(28,249	)		(3,594	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(6,395	)		(13,356	)		(13,073	)		(4,902	)		(424,477	)		(28,440	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation expense		205			46			381			159			1,122			803
Proceeds from issuance of Common Shares		478			243			6,365			1,567			8,829			3,452
Repayment of long-term debt		(99	)		—			(1,071	)		(61	)		(2,244	)		(61	)
Proceeds from long-term debt								—			—			390,000			12,928
Debt issuance costs		(21	)		—			—			—			(7,433	)		—

Net cash provided by financing activities		563			289			5,675			1,665			390,274			17,122

Foreign exchange gain (loss) on cash held in foreign currencies		65			(342	)		1,338			1,025			4,125			(463	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period		3,870			(13,131	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents, during the period								35,282			26,487			52,329			33,590
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		107,354			79,898			124,401			87,001			107,354			79,898

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	111,224		$	66,767		$	159,683		$	113,488		$	159,683		$	113,488

Supplementary cash flow disclosures (note 14)
Supplementary cash flow disclosures (note 15)

See accompanying unaudited notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“Interim Financial Statements”) include the accounts of Open Text Corporation and its wholly and partially owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “Open Text” or the “Company”. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

These Interim Financial Statements are expressed in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). These financial statements are based upon accounting policies and methods of their application are consistent with those used and described in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements. The Interim Financial Statements do not include all of the financial statement disclosures included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and therefore should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.

The information furnished, as of March 31, 2007 and for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, is unaudited; however it reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods ~~presented.~~presented, and includes the financial results of Hummingbird Ltd. (“Hummingbird”), with effect from October 2, 2006, and Momentum Systems Inc. (“Momentum”), with effect from March 2, 2007. The operating results for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any succeeding quarter or the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable at that time, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In particular, significant estimates, judgments and assumptions include those related to: (i) revenue recognition, (ii) allowance for doubtful accounts, (iii) testing goodwill for impairment, (iv) the valuation of acquired intangible assets, (v) the valuation of long-lived assets, (vi) the recognition of contingencies, (vii) facility and restructuring accruals, (viii) acquisition accruals, (ix) asset retirement obligations, (x) realization of investment tax credits, ~~and~~ (xi) the valuation allowance relating to the Company’s deferred tax ~~assets.~~assets, (xii) the recognition of share-based payment expense and (xiii) the recognition of unrealized gains/losses on financial instruments.

Certain prior period comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to current period presentation including the reclassification of amortization of acquired technology intangible assets from Amortization of acquired intangible assets set forth under Operating expenses to Cost of revenue. The reclassification of Amortization of acquired technology intangible assets increased Cost of revenues and decreased Operating expenses by $4.6 million forFor the three months ended ~~September 30, 2005~~March 31, 2006, General and administrative expenses have been increased by approximately $190,000 with corresponding decreases of approximately $27,000, $61,000, and $102,000 in Sales and marketing expenses, Cost of services revenues and Cost of customer support revenues, respectively, from previously reported amounts.

General and administrative expenses increased by $2.2 million with a corresponding decrease of $192,000, $805,000 and $1.2 million in Cost of revenues for service, Research and development expense and Sales and marketing expense, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2005 from previously reported amounts. This reclassification These reclassifications related to a change in the method of allocating operating expenses within the Company.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2006, General and administrative expenses, Cost of service revenues and Cost of customer support revenues have been increased by $75,000, $361,000, and $593,000, respectively, with corresponding decreases of approximately $314,000 and $715,000 in Sales and marketing expenses, and

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

Research and development expenses, respectively, from previously reported amounts. These reclassifications related to a change in the method of allocating operating expenses within the Company.

Service revenues increased by ~~$1.3~~approximately $1.6 million and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, offset by a decrease in Customer support revenues of ~~$1.3~~approximately $1.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, from previously reported amounts. Cost of service revenues increased by ~~$623,000,~~approximately $784,000 and $2.4 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively, offset by a decrease in ~~cost~~Cost of customer support ~~revenues~~revenue of ~~$623,000, in each case, for the three months ended September 30, 2005~~approximately $784,000 and $2.4 million, respectively, from previously reported amounts. These changes correspond to an internal reclassification pertaining to the Company’s Enterprise Support Program (“ESP program”). The ESP program is a customized “on-site” support program that provides support services that suit the specific requirements of the Company’s customers.

There was no change to income ~~(loss)~~ from operations or net income (loss) per share in any of the periods presented as a result of these reclassifications.

Comprehensive net income ~~(loss)~~ is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive net income, ~~(loss),~~ including the effect of foreign currency translation resulting from the consolidation of subsidiaries where the functional currency is a currency other than the U.S. Dollar. The Company’s total comprehensive net income ~~(loss)~~ was as follows:

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment to FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS 159 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its financial statements.

Misstatements”, (“SAB 108”).SAB 108 requires analysis of misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain) approach in assessing materiality and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment. SAB 108 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year 2007 annual financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SAB 108 will have on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)~~FASB issued ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)~~SFAS No. 157, ~~Fair~~“Fair Value ~~Measurements,~~Measurements”, (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. This statement is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its financial statements.

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 on Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). Under FIN 48, an entity should presume that a taxing authority will examine a tax position when evaluating ~~the~~its position for recognition and measurement; therefore, assessment of the probability of the risk of examination is not appropriate. In applying the provisions of FIN 48, there will be distinct recognition and measurement evaluations. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the appropriate amount of the benefit to recognize. The amount of benefit to recognize will be measured as the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be realized. The tax position should be derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not of being sustained. On subsequent recognition and measurement the maximum amount which is more likely than not to be recognized at each reporting date will represent management’s best estimate, given the information available at the reporting date, even though the outcome of the tax position is not absolute or final. Subsequent recognition, derecognition, and measurement should be based on new information. A liability for interest or penalties or both will be recognized as deemed to be incurred based on the provisions of the tax law, that is, the period for which the taxing authority will begin assessing the interest or penalties or both. The amount of interest expense recognized will be based on the difference between the amount recognized in the financial statements and the benefit recognized in the tax return. On transition, the change in net assets due to applying the provisions of the final interpretation will be considered as a change in accounting principle with the cumulative effect of the change treated as an offsetting adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of transition. FIN 48 will be effective for the Company as of ~~the beginning of the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2006 and will be adopted by the Company for the year ended June 30, 2008.~~July 1, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial statements.

The Company’s investments in marketable securities consist of investments in the equity of Hummingbird Ltd. (“Hummingbird”). The cost of the investment is $21.1 million. Unrealized gains and losses on this investment, net of tax, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity wherein the Company has recorded a gain, net of tax, of $206,000 and a loss, net of tax, of $45,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, the fair value of this investment was approximately $21.1 million and was determined based on the closing price of Hummingbird shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

On October 2, 2006, the Company acquired all of the remaining issued and outstanding shares of Hummingbird. In view of this, the investment in the equity of Hummingbird was included as part of the cost of the acquisition of Hummingbird. For details relating to this acquisition see Note 1718 “Acquisitions” ~~in these Notes~~ to the Interim Financial Statements.

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)


	As of September 30, 2006						As of March 31, 2007
	Cost		Accumulated Depreciation		Net		Cost		Accumulated Depreciation		Net
Furniture and fixtures	$	8,474	$	6,505	$	1,969	$	9,866	$	7,576	$	2,290
Office equipment		8,272		7,048		1,224		8,490		7,378		1,112
Computer hardware		67,308		56,377		10,931		69,680		60,446		9,234
Computer software		17,397		12,216		5,181		18,659		13,211		5,448
Leasehold improvements		12,400		8,196		4,204		13,715		8,627		5,088
Building		16,652		415		16,237
Land and Buildings*								23,027		838		22,189

	$	130,503	$	90,757	$	39,746	$	143,437	$	98,076	$	45,361


	As of June 30, 2006						As of June 30, 2006
	Cost		Accumulated Depreciation		Net		Cost		Accumulated Depreciation		Net
Furniture and fixtures	$	8,605	$	6,360	$	2,245	$	8,605	$	6,360	$	2,245
Office equipment		8,281		6,992		1,289		8,281		6,992		1,289
Computer hardware		66,714		54,995		11,719		66,714		54,995		11,719
Computer software		17,023		11,737		5,286		17,023		11,737		5,286
Leasehold improvements		12,374		8,064		4,310		12,374		8,064		4,310
Building		16,726		313		16,413		16,726		313		16,413

	$	129,723	$	88,461	$	41,262	$	129,723	$	88,461	$	41,262

Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid for an acquisition of a business exceeds the fair value of identifiable net tangible and intangible assets. The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill since June 30, 2005:


Balance, June 30, 2005	$	243,091		$	243,091
Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions		(17,470	)		(17,470	)
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange		9,902			9,902

Balance, June 30, 2006		235,523			235,523
Acquisition of Momentum					3,251
Acquisition of Hummingbird					271,239
Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions		(671	)		7,999
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange		(887	)		8,624

Balance, September 30, 2006	$	233,965
Balance, March 31, 2007				$	526,636

Adjustments relating to prior acquisitions primarily relate to the ~~reduction of~~adjustments to goodwill ~~on account of corresponding reductions in valuation allowances~~ based upon the review and evaluation of the tax attributes of acquisition-related operating loss carry forwards and deductions originally assessed at the various dates of acquisition and ~~offset by~~ increases to goodwill relating to IXOS Software AG (“IXOS”) and Gauss Interprise AG (“Gauss”) share purchases and step accounting adjustments.

As indicated in Note 18 “Acquisitions” to the Interim Financial Statements the amounts assigned to intangible assets on account of the acquisition of Hummingbird are preliminary only and subject to change.

The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and each of the next four years thereafter, assuming no further adjustments to acquired intangible assets are made:

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

~~The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for each of the next five years, assuming no further adjustments to acquired intangible assets are made:~~

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~


	As of September 30, 2006		As of June 30, 2006		As of March 31, 2007		As of June 30, 2006
Pension liabilities	$	582	$	582	$	582	$	582
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring (note 16)		1,419		1,851
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring (note 17)						1,482		1,851
Amounts payable in respect of acquisitions and acquisition related accruals		12,745		14,224		10,886		14,224
Other accrued liabilities		568		568		565		568
Asset retirement obligations		3,848		3,896		5,365		3,896

	$	19,162	$	21,121	$	18,880	$	21,121

The Company acquired a controlling interest in IXOS in March 2004. IXOS has pension commitments to employees as well as to current and previous members of its executive board. The actuarial cost method used in determining the net periodic pension cost, with respect to the IXOS employees, is the projected unit credit method. The liabilities and annual income or expense of the Company’s pension plan are determined using methodologies that involve various actuarial assumptions, the most significant of which are the discount rate and the long-term rate of return on assets. The Company’s policy is to deposit amounts with an insurance company to cover the actuarial present value of the expected retirement benefits. The ~~total held in short-term investments~~fair value of plan assets as of ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 was ~~$2.6~~$2.8 million (June 30, ~~2006 - $2.6~~2006—$2.6 million). The fair value of the pension obligation as of ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 was $3.0 million (June 30, ~~2006 - $3.0~~2006—$3.0 million).

The Company is required to return certain of its leased facilities to their original state at the conclusion of the lease. The Company has accounted for such obligations in accordance with FASB SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (“SFAS 143”). At ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the present value of this obligation was ~~$3.8~~$5.4 million, (June 30, ~~2006 - $3.9~~2006—$3.9 million), with an undiscounted value of ~~$4.8~~$7.0 million, (June 30, ~~2006 - $4.8~~2006—$4.8 million). These leases were primarily assumed in connection with the IXOS ~~acquisition.~~and Hummingbird acquisitions.

Excess facility obligations and acquisition related accruals ~~relating to acquisitions~~

The Company has accrued for the cost of excess facilities ~~both~~ in connection ~~with its Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2006 restructuring, as well as~~ with a number of its ~~acquisitions.~~acquisitions, including its fiscal 2007 Hummingbird acquisition. These accruals represent the Company’s best estimate in respect of future sub-lease income and costs incurred to achieve sub-tenancy. These liabilities have been recorded using present value discounting techniques and will be discharged over the term of the respective leases. The difference between the present value and actual cash paid for the excess facility will be charged to other income over the terms of the leases ranging between ~~several months~~one year to 17 years.

~~Transaction-related~~Acquisition related costs include amounts provided for certain pre-acquisition contingencies.

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

The following table summarizes the activity with respect to the Company’s acquisition accruals during the ~~period~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006.~~March 31, 2007.


													Balance June 30, 2006		Initial Accruals		Usage/ Foreign Exchange/ Other Adjustments			Subsequent Adjustments to Goodwill			Balance March 31, 2007
Hummingbird
Employee termination costs													$	—	$	23,619	$	(13,470	)	$	3,416		$	13,565
Excess facilities														—		2,408		(1,084	)		1,537			2,861
Transaction-related costs														—		7,429		(6,866	)		—			563

	Balance June 30, 2006		Initial Accruals		Usage/ Foreign Exchange/ Other Adjustments			Subsequent Adjustments to Goodwill			Balance September 30, 2006			—		33,456		(21,420	)		4,953			16,989
IXOS
Employee termination costs	$	22	$	—	$	(22	)	$	—		$	—		22		—		(22	)		—			—
Excess facilities		17,401		—		(1,326	)		—			16,075		17,401		—		(3,572	)		(251	)		13,578
Transaction-related costs		616		—		(2	)		—			614		616		—		(497	)		—			119

		18,039		—		(1,350	)		—			16,689		18,039		—		(4,091	)		(251	)		13,697
Gauss
Transaction-related costs		34		—		(7	)		—			27		34		—		(6	)		(28	)		—

		34		—		(7	)		—			27		34		—		(6	)		(28	)		—
Eloquent
Transaction-related costs		243		—		—			—			243		243		—		—			—			243

		243		—		—			—			243		243		—		—			—			243
Centrinity
Excess facilities		3,329		—		(69	)		—			3,260		3,329		—		(286	)		(576	)		2,467
Transaction-related costs		221		—		(148	)		(34	)		39		221		—		(148	)		(73	)		—

		3,550		—		(217	)		(34	)		3,299		3,550		—		(434	)		(649	)		2,467
Artesia
Excess facilities		761		—		(227	)		(306	)		228		761		—		(394	)		(306	)		61
Transaction-related costs		12		—		(12	)		—			—		12		—		(12	)		—			—

		773		—		(239	)		(306	)		228		773		—		(406	)		(306	)		61
Vista
Transaction-related costs		6		—		—			(6	)		—		6		—		—			(6	)		—

		6		—		—			(6	)		—		6		—		—			(6	)		—
Optura
Excess facilities		30		—		(30	)		—			—		30		—		(30	)		—			—
Transaction-related costs		12		—		—			(12	)		—		12		—		—			(12	)		—

		42		—		(30	)		(12	)		—		42		—		(30	)		(12	)		—

Totals
Employee termination costs		22		—		(22	)		—			—		22		23,619		(13,492	)		3,416			13,565
Excess facilities		21,521		—		(1,652	)		(306	)		19,563		21,521		2,408		(5,366	)		404			18,967
Transaction-related costs		1,144		—		(169	)		(52	)		923		1,144		7,429		(7,529	)		(119	)		925

	$	22,687	$	—	$	(1,843	)	$	(358	)	$	20,486	$	22,687	$	33,456	$	(26,387	)	$	3,701		$	33,457

The adjustments to goodwill ~~relate~~relating to employee termination costs and excess facilities ~~primarily to adjustments~~are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection With a Purchase Business Combination”. The adjustments to goodwill relating to transaction costs are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”).

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

On October 2, 2006, the Company entered into a $465.0 million credit agreement (the “credit agreement”) with a Canadian chartered bank (the “bank”) consisting of a $390.0 million term loan facility (the “term loan”) and a $75.0 million committed revolving long-term credit facility (the “revolver”). The term loan was used to partially finance the Hummingbird acquisition and the revolver will be used for general business purposes. The credit agreement is guaranteed by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries.

~~Long-term debt~~The term loan has a seven year term and expires on October 2, 2013 and bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%. The term loan principal repayments are equal to 0.25% ($975,000) of the original principal amount, due each quarter with the remainder due at the end of the term.

In October 2006, the Company entered into an interest-rate collar agreement (the “collar”) that has the economic effect of circumscribing the floating portion of the interest rate obligations associated with $195.0 million of the term loan within an upper limit of 5.34% and a lower limit of 4.79%. For more details relating to the collar see Note 9 “Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities” to the Interim Financial Statements.

The revolver has a five year term and expires on October 2, 2011. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at rates specified in the credit agreement. The revolver replaced a CAD $40.0 million line of credit (the “old line of credit”) that the Company previously had with the bank. The Company was required to terminate the old line of credit prior to executing its current credit agreement. As of the date of termination, there were no borrowings outstanding on the CAD $40.0 million line of credit, nor were there any termination penalties. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver as of March 31, 2007.

The mortgage consists of a five year mortgage agreement entered into during December 2005 with ~~a Canadian chartered~~the bank. The principal amount of the mortgage is ~~Canadian Dollars (“CDN”)~~CAD $15.0 million. The mortgage: (i) has a fixed term of five years, (ii) matures on January 1, 2011, and (iii) is secured by a lien on the Company’s headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario. Interest is to be paid monthly at a fixed rate of 5.25% per annum. Principal and interest are payable in monthly installments of ~~CDN~~CAD $101,000 with a final lump sum principal payment of ~~CDN~~CAD $12.6 million due on maturity. ~~The mortgage may not be prepaid in whole or in part at anytime prior to the maturity date.~~

As of ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the carrying values of the building and mortgage were ~~$16.2~~$15.5 million and ~~$13.2~~$12.6 million, respectively.

In October 2, 2006, ~~the Company~~Open Text entered into a ~~$465.0~~three year interest-rate collar that had the economic effect of circumscribing the floating portion of the interest rate obligations associated with $195.0 million of the term loan within an upper limit of 5.34% and a lower limit of 4.79%. This was pursuant to a requirement in the credit agreement ~~with a Canadian chartered bank. For details relating to this agreement see Note 18 “Subsequent Events” in these Notes to the Interim Financial Statements.~~

~~On February 2, 2006,~~that required the Company ~~secured a demand operating facility~~to maintain, from thirty days following the date on which the term loan was entered into through the third anniversary or such earlier date on which the term loan is paid, interest rate hedging arrangements with counterparties in respect of ~~CDN $40.0 million from a Canadian chartered bank (the “credit facility”). Borrowings under this facility bear interest at varying rates depending upon the nature~~50% of the ~~borrowings.~~aggregate actual and projected principal amount of the term loan.

SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”) requires that changes in a derivative instrument’s fair value be recognized in current earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met and that an entity must formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that qualify for hedge accounting.

SFAS 133 requires that written options must meet certain criteria in order for hedge accounting to apply. The Company ~~has pledged certain~~determined that these criteria were not met and hedge accounting could not be applied for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. The fair market value of ~~its assets as collateral for this credit facility. There are no stand-by fees for this facility. As of September 30, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility.~~

~~On October 2, 2006,~~ the ~~credit facility was cancelled upon~~collar, which represents the cash the Company ~~entering into~~would receive or pay to settle the collar, was a ~~new credit agreement with a Canadian chartered bank.~~payable of approximately $576,000 as of March 31, 2007, and has been included within “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 an expense of approximately $364,000 and $576,000, representing the change in the fair value of the collar, has been included within interest expense within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company ~~was not subject~~records payments or receipts on the collar as adjustments to ~~any termination penalties. For details relating~~interest expense. The collar has a remaining term to ~~this new credit agreement~~maturity of 2.75 years.

The Company will continue to monitor changes in interest rates periodically and ~~termination of the existing credit agreement see Note 18 “Subsequent Events”~~will assess whether hedge accounting could potentially be applied in ~~these Notes to the Interim Financial Statements.~~future periods.

To date, the Company has not disclosed the AfDA assumed as part of the acquisition of Hummingbird in its presentation of AfDA since business combination accounting rules require that acquired receivables be recorded at their estimated fair value.

However, in these unaudited notes to the Interim Financial Statements, the Company has disclosed the AfDA assumed as part of the acquisition of Hummingbird in its presentation of AfDA, as the Company believes

that such presentation provides additional information about the on-going changes in the consolidated AfDA balance. This presentation has no impact on the net balance of accounts receivable included in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets included in the Interim Financial Statements.

Included in accounts receivable are unbilled receivables in the amount of ~~$3.4~~$3.6 million and $4.3 million as of ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively.

The authorized share capital of the Company includes an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of first preference shares. No preference shares have been issued.

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

On May 19, 2006, the Company commenced a share repurchase program (“(hereinafter referred to as the “May 2006 Repurchase Program”) that provided for the repurchase of up to a maximum of 2,444,104 Common Shares. Purchase and payment for the Company’s Common Shares under the May 2006 Repurchase Program will be determined by the Board of Directors of Open Text and will be made in accordance with the rules and policies of the ~~NASDAQ.~~Nasdaq Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”). The May 2006 Repurchase Program ~~will terminate~~was superseded by a new repurchase program initiated on May ~~18,~~2, 2007. For details relating to this, see Note 19 “Subsequent Events” to the Interim Financial Statements.

During the three and nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company did not repurchase any of its Common Shares.

During the three months ended ~~September 30, 2005, the Company issued 46,581~~March 31, 2007, 16,261 Common Shares were issued under the ESPP for cash collected from employees, in prior periods, totaling $317,000. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, 38,470 Common Shares were issued under the ESPP for cash collected from employees, in prior periods, totaling $622,000. In addition, cash in the amount of approximately $174,000 was received from employees for the three months ended March 31, 2007, that will be used to ~~the former shareholders of DOMEA eGovernment (“Domea”) relating to an acquisition agreement commitment, made as part of the acquisition of Domea, to issue~~purchase Common Shares in ~~connection with~~future periods.

During the achievement of certain post-acquisition revenue targets. Upon issuance, the value ascribed to the shares of $813,000 was transferred from Commitment to issue shares to Share capital. The Company did not repurchase any of itsthree months ended March 31, 2006, 25,691 Common Shares ~~during this period.~~were issued under the ESPP. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, 281,093 Common Shares were issued under the ESPP for cash collected from employees, in prior periods, totaling $3.4 million. In addition, cash in the amount $172,000 was received from employees for the three months ended March 31, 2006 that was used to purchase Common Shares in future periods.

As of ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007 options to purchase an aggregate of ~~5,662,951~~5,127,280 Common Shares are outstanding under all of the Company’s stock option plans. In addition, ~~253,220 Common Shares~~1,298,220 stock options are available for issuance under the 1998 Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Stock Option Plan. The Company’s stock options generally vest over four to five years and expire ten years from the date of the grant. The exercise price of options granted is equivalent to the fair market value of the stock at the date of ~~grant except as noted hereinafter in the case of non-employee members of the Board of Directors only.~~grant.

Options granted to non-employee members of the Board of Directors vest as of the date of the Company’s Annual General Meeting of shareholders immediately following the date of the grant of the options. The exercise price of options granted is usually equivalent to the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant but in no event is the exercise price less than the market price at the date of grant, as defined in the relevant stock option plan.

~~A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock option plans for the three months ended September 30, 2006 is as follows:~~

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock option plans for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 is as follows:

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”) and ~~SEC~~United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable, while the options issued by the Company are subject to both vesting and restrictions on transfer. In addition, option-pricing models require input of subjective assumptions including the estimated life of the option and the expected volatility of the underlying stock over the estimated life of the option. The Company uses historical volatility as a basis for projecting the expected volatility of the underlying stock and estimates the expected life of its stock options based upon historical data.

The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair value of the Company’s stock option grants. Estimates of fair value are not intended, however, to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the weighted-average fair value of options granted, as of the grant date, was ~~$7.50,~~$10.41, using the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 45%; risk-free interest rate of 4.7%; expected dividend yield of 0%; and expected life of 5.0 years. For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the weighted-average fair value of options granted, as of the grant date, was $7.03, using the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 46%; risk-free interest rate of 4.6%; expected dividend yield of 0%; expected life of 4.8 years. A forfeiture rate of 5%, based on historical rates, was used to determine the net amount of compensation expense recognized for each of these periods.

During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued a net number of 98,578 stock options to the former employees of Hummingbird in replacement of their fully vested Hummingbird stock options (“replacement options”). These options were valued using the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 47%; risk-free interest rate of 4.3%; expected dividend yield of 0%; and expected life of 4.5 years, resulting in an approximate fair value of $7.30 per replacement option. Approximately $286,000 has been allocated to the cost of the Hummingbird acquisition, and the remainder will be amortized to share-based compensation cost over a vesting period of 4 years. No further replacement options have been issued by the Company during the nine months ended March 31, 2007.

For the three months ended March 31, 2006, the weighted-average fair value of options granted, as of the grant date, was $9.30, using the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 54%; risk-free interest rate of 4.4%; expected dividend yield of 0%; and expected life of 5.5 years. For the nine months ended March 31, 2006, the weighted-average fair value of options granted, as of the grant date, was $8.47, using the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 55%; risk-free interest rate of 4.4%; expected dividend yield of 0%; and expected life of 5.5 years. A forfeiture rate of 5%, based on historical rates, was used to determine the net amount of compensation expense ~~recognized.~~

~~For the three months ended September 30, 2005 no stock options were granted by the Company.~~recognized for each of these periods.

In each of the above periods, no cash was used by the Company to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation arrangements.

The fair value of awards granted prior to July 1, 2005 is not adjusted to be consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123R from the amounts disclosed previously, on a pro forma basis, in the Audited Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Form 10-Ks or in the notes to the Interim Financial Statements in the Company’s Form 10-Qs. As of ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the total compensation cost related to unvested stock awards not yet recognized in the ~~statement~~unaudited condensed consolidated statements of ~~operations~~income was ~~$10.9~~$12.5 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years. As of September 30, 2005, the total compensation cost related to unvested stock awards not yet recognized in the statement of operations was $10.6 million, which would have been recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.

Share-based compensation cost included in the ~~statement~~unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 was approximately ~~$1.3 million.~~$1.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Deferred tax assets of ~~$171,000~~$243,000 and $627,000, respectively, were recorded ~~as of September 30, 2006~~for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, in relation to the tax effect of certain stock options that are eligible for a tax deduction when exercised. Share-based compensation cost included in the ~~statement~~unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2005~~March 31, 2006 was approximately ~~$1.4 million.~~$1.1 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Deferred tax assets of ~~$169,000~~$144,000 and $467,000, respectively, were recorded ~~as of September 30, 2005~~for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, in relation to the tax effect of certain stock options that are eligible for a tax deduction when exercised. ~~The Company has not capitalized any share-based compensation costs as part of the cost of an asset.~~

For the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, cash in the amount of ~~$299,000~~$6.2 million and $8.3 million, respectively, was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by the Company ~~during the three months ended September 30, 2006~~ from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction, during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, was ~~$205,000,~~approximately $381,000 and ~~this amount~~$1.1 million, respectively, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

For the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2005,~~March 31, 2006, cash in the amount of ~~$160,000~~$1.4 million and $3.0 million, respectively, was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by the Company ~~during the three months ended September 30, 2005~~ from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction, during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 was ~~$46,000,~~$159,000 and ~~this amount~~$803,000, respectively, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

During the three months ended September 30, 2006, 22,209 Common Shares were issued under the ESPP for cash collected from employees totaling $305,000. In addition, cash in the amount $179,190 was received from employees that will be used to purchase Common Shares in future periods.

~~During the three months ended September 30, 2005, 255,402 Common Shares were issued under the ESPP for cash collected from employees totaling $3.1 million.~~

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the shares used in the calculation of basic net income (loss) per share plus the

dilutive effect of common share equivalents, such as stock options, using the treasury stock method. Common share equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.


	Three months ended September 30,					Three months ended March 31,				Nine months ended March 31,
	2006		2005			2007		2006		2007		2006
Basic net income (loss) per share
Net income (loss)	$	7,301	$	(12,868	)	$	3,853	$	7,322	$	13,431	$	(2,825	)

Basic net income (loss) per share	$	0.15	$	(0.27	)	$	0.08	$	0.15	$	0.27	$	(0.06	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share
Net income (loss)	$	7,301	$	(12,868	)	$	3,853	$	7,322	$	13,431	$	(2,825	)
						��
Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	0.15	$	(0.27	)	$	0.08	$	0.15	$	0.26	$	(0.06	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
Basic		48,975		48,439			49,490		48,762		49,203		48,590
Effect of dilutive securities *		1,244		—
Effect of dilutive securities*							1,644		1,498		1,500		—

Diluted		50,219		48,439			51,134		50,260		50,703		48,590

Excluded as anti-dilutive **		2,504		2,626
Excluded as anti-dilutive**							813		1,663		1,917		2,245

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

The Company operates in various tax jurisdictions, and accordingly, the Company’s income is subject to varying rates of tax. Losses incurred in one jurisdiction cannot be used to offset income taxes payable in another. The Company’s ability to use income tax losses and future income tax deductions is dependent upon the profitable operations of the Company in the tax jurisdictions in which such losses or deductions arise. As of ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, the Company had total net deferred tax assets of ~~$62.1~~$78.7 million and $65.9 million, respectively, and total deferred tax liabilities of ~~$29.2~~$113.7 million and $31.7 million, respectively.

Deferred tax assets arise primarily from available income tax losses and future income tax deductions. The Company provides a valuation allowance if sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets. Taking into account the following factors: (i) the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, (ii) projected future taxable income, (iii) the character of the income tax assets and (iv) tax planning strategies, a valuation allowance of ~~$126.5~~$168.8 million and $127.5 million was ~~required~~recorded as of ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. The majority of the valuation allowance relates to uncertainties regarding the utilization of foreign pre-acquisition losses of Hummingbird, Gauss ~~Interprise AG (“Gauss”)~~ and IXOS. The Company continues to evaluate its taxable position quarterly and considers factors by taxing jurisdiction such as estimated taxable income, the history of losses for tax purposes and the growth of the Company, among others. The principal component of the total deferred tax liabilities arises from acquired intangible assets purchased in the Hummingbird, Gauss and IXOS transactions.

SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” establishes standards for the reporting, by public business enterprises, of information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method of determining what information to report is based on the way that management organizes the operating segments within the Company for making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance.

The Company’s operations fall into one dominant industry segment, being enterprise content management software. The Company manages its operations, and accordingly determines its operating segments, on a geographic basis. The Company has two reportable segments: North America and Europe. The Company evaluates operating segment performance based on revenues and direct operating expenses of the segment, based on the location of the respective customers. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of accounting policies. No segments have been aggregated.

Included in the following operating results are allocations of certain operating costs that are incurred in one reporting segment but which relate to all reporting segments. The allocations of these common operating costs are consistent with the manner in which they are allocated for the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) of the Company’s analysis. For the three and nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, ~~and September 30, 2005,~~ the “Other” category consists of geographic regions other than North America and Europe. Revenues from transactions that both emanate and conclude within operating segments are not considered for the purpose of this disclosure since such transactions are not reviewed by the CODM. The reclassification of certain prior period comparative figures, to conform to current period presentation, referred to in Note 1 “Basis of Presentation” to the Interim Financial Statements, did not impact information about the reportable segments, reported hereunder.

Adjusted operating margin from operating segments does not include: (i) amortization of acquired intangible assets, (ii) provision for (recovery of) restructuring charges, (iii) other income (expense), (iv) share-based compensation and (v) provision for income taxes. Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets have been

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

assigned to segment assets based on the relative benefit that the reporting units are expected to receive from the assets, or the location of the acquired business operations to which they relate. These allocations have been made on a consistent basis.

Contribution margin does not include amortization of intangible assets, depreciation, provision for (recovery of) special charges, other income (expense), interest income (expense), minority interest, and the provision for (recovery of) income taxes.

A reconciliation of the totals reported for the operating segments to the applicable line items in the Interim Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

A reconciliation of the totals reported for the operating segments to the applicable line items in the Interim Financial Statements as of ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006 is as follows:

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

The following table sets forth the distribution of revenues determined by location of customer and identifiable assets, by significant geographic area, for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 and ~~2005:~~2006:


	Three months ended September 30,					Three months ended March 31,				Nine months ended March 31,
	2006			2005		2007		2006		2007		2006
Total revenues:
Canada	$	6,711		$	7,240	$	12,515	$	8,244	$	30,445	$	23,896
United States		42,021			38,989		62,715		37,658		166,369		122,022
United Kingdom		10,838			8,781		19,756		10,945		49,023		28,837
Germany		16,243			15,109		22,023		18,424		69,025		53,704
Rest of Europe		20,370			17,542		31,631		20,287		85,746		59,716
Other		4,972			4,969		7,412		5,368		19,860		16,152
			��
Total revenues	$	101,155		$	92,630	$	156,052	$	100,926	$	420,468	$	304,327


	As of September 30, 2006			As of June 30, 2006
Segment assets:
Canada	$	157,649		$	97,421
United States		158,979			170,810
United Kingdom		39,285			53,501
Germany		144,131			177,651
Rest of Europe		104,013			99,987
Other		37,829			38,550

Total segment assets	$	641,886		$	637,920

The Company’s goodwill has been allocated as follows to the Company’s operating segments:

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

The Company has entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum annual payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:


	Payments due by period										Payments due by period
	Total		2007		2008 to 2009		2010 to 2011		2012 and beyond		Total		2007		2008 to 2009		2010 to 2011		2012 and beyond
Long-term debt obligations	$	15,977	$	813	$	2,168	$	12,996	$	—	$	595,672	$	8,853	$	70,433	$	79,688	$	436,698
Operating lease obligations *		86,794		13,745		34,268		27,012		11,769		99,059		6,588		46,200		32,644		13,627
Purchase obligations		4,235		1,836		1,921		478		—		5,924		1,047		3,962		915		—

	$	107,006	$	16,394	$	38,357	$	40,486	$	11,769	$	700,655	$	16,488	$	120,595	$	113,247	$	450,325

Rental expense of ~~$2.3~~$3.9 million and ~~$3.6~~$10.0 million was recorded during the three and nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007, respectively.

Rental expense of $1.8 million and $9.1 million was recorded during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, ~~and September 30, 2005,~~ respectively.

The long-term debt obligations are comprised of interest and principal payments on the 5Company’s $390.0 million term loan agreement and a five year mortgage on the Company’s headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario. For the purpose of calculating the interest on the $390.0 million term loan, LIBOR has been assumed at 5.35%, which is the three-month LIBOR rate as of March 30, 2007. For details relating to ~~this~~the term loan and the mortgage see Note 8 ~~in these~~“Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities” to the Interim Financial Statements.

The Company does not enter into off-balance sheet financing arrangements as a matter of practice except for the use of operating leases for office space, computer equipment and vehicles. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, neither the lease liability nor the underlying asset is carried on the balance sheet, as the terms of the leases do not meet the criteria for capitalization.

On December 1, 2004, the Company announced that it had entered into a domination and profit transfer agreement (the “IXOS DA”) with IXOS. The IXOS DA came into force in August 2005 when it was registered in

the commercial register at the local court in Munich. Under the terms of the IXOS DA, Open Text acquired authority to issue directives to the management of IXOS. Also within the terms of the IXOS DA, Open Text offered to purchase the remaining Common Shares of IXOS for a cash purchase price of Euro 9.38 per share (“Purchase Price”) which was the weighted average fair value of the IXOS Common Shares as of December 1, 2004. Additionally, Open Text has guaranteed a payment by IXOS to the minority shareholders of IXOS of an annual compensation of Euro 0.42 per share (“Annual Compensation”).

The IXOS DA was registered on August 23, 2005. In the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company commenced accruing the amount payable to minority shareholders of IXOS on account of Annual Compensation. This amount has been accounted for as a “guaranteed dividend”, payable to the minority shareholders, and is recorded as a charge to minority interest in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

Based on the number of minority IXOS shareholders as of ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the estimated amount of Annual Compensation ~~was~~is approximately ~~$130,000~~$124,000 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 31, 2007 and $377,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007. Additionally, an amount of approximately $397,000 was paid, against previously accrued amounts, to the IXOS minority shareholders on account of Annual Compensation for the year ended June 30, 2006. Because the Company is unable to predict, with reasonable accuracy, the number of IXOS minority shareholders in future periods, the Company is unable to predict the amount of Annual Compensation that will be payable in future years.

Certain IXOS shareholders have filed for a procedure granted under German law at the district court of Munich, Germany, asking the court to review the proposed amount of the Annual Compensation and the Purchase Price (the “IXOS Appraisal Procedures”) for the amounts offered under the IXOS DA. It cannot be predicted at this stage, whether the court will increase the Annual Compensation and/or the Purchase Price in the IXOS Appraisal Procedures. The purchase offer made under the IXOS DA will expire at the end of the IXOS Appraisal Procedures.

These disputes are a normal and probable part of the process of acquiring minority shares in Germany. The costs associated with the above mentioned shareholder objections to the proposed fair value of the Annual Compensation and the Purchase Price are direct incremental costs associated with the ongoing step acquisitions of shares held by the minority shareholders and have been deferred within Goodwill pending the outcome of the objections. The Company is unable to predict the future costs associated with these activities that will be payable in future periods.

Pursuant to a domination agreement dated November 4, 2003 (the “Gauss DA”) between Open Text and Gauss, Open Text has offered to purchase the remaining outstanding shares of Gauss at a price of Euro 1.06 per share (the “Gauss Purchase Price I”). As a result of certain shareholders having filed for a special court procedure to review the proposed amount of the Gauss Purchase Price I that must be payable to minority shareholders as a result of the Gauss DA, the acceptance period has been extended pursuant to German law until the end of such proceedings. In addition, in April 2004 Gauss announced that effective July 1, 2004 the shares of Gauss would cease to be listed on a stock exchange. In connection with this delisting, on July 2, 2004, a second offer by Open Text to purchase the remaining outstanding shares of Gauss at a price of Euro 1.06 per share, commenced. This acceptance period has also been extended pursuant to German law until the end of proceedings to reassess the amount of the consideration offered under German law in the delisting process. The shareholders’ resolution on the Gauss DA and on the delisting was subject to a court procedure in which certain shareholders of Gauss claimed that the resolution by which the shareholders of Gauss approved of the entering into the Gauss DA and the authorization to the management board of Gauss to file for a delisting are null and void. As a result of an out of court settlement, the complaints have been withdrawn and it has been agreed between Open Text and the minority Gauss shareholders that an amount of Euro 0.05 per share per annum will be payable as compensation to certain shareholders of Gauss under certain circumstances, but only after registration of the Squeeze Out as defined hereafter.

In Germany, once ownership of 95% of the shares of a company is obtained, an acquirer can go through a “Squeeze-Out” process which is very similar to the Domination Agreement process. The only difference is if the Squeeze Out is registered, the shares of minority shareholders are transferred automatically—by virtue of the law—to the acquirer. On August 25, 2005, at the shareholders meeting of Gauss, upon a motion of Open Text, it was decided to transfer the shares of the minority shareholders, which at the time of the shareholders’ meeting held less than 5% of the shares of Gauss, to Open Text (“Squeeze Out”). Certain shareholders of Gauss had filed suits to oppose all or some of the resolutions of the shareholders’ meeting of August 25, 2005.

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

On October 27, 2006, the ~~Squeeze Out~~“Squeeze Out” agreement with the Gauss minority shareholders was registered in the Commercial Register in the Local Court of Hamburg. ~~See Note 18 “Subsequent Events”~~Certain shareholders have filed a special procedure in ~~these Interim Financial Statements.~~

~~The Company has recorded its best estimate~~the German courts to reassess the value of the ~~amount payable~~purchase price and annual compensation. The procedure is still pending and the Company is not able to determine the ~~minority shareholders~~likely date by which such procedure will be completed.

As of ~~Gauss under the Squeeze Out. In the three months ended September 30,~~December 31, 2006, the Company has ~~accrued $7,500 for such payments, resulting in total accruals~~acquired 100% of ~~$82,500 as of September 30, 2006. The Company is currently in the process of determining the final amounts payable to shareholders~~all issued and outstanding common shares of Gauss.

The Company has entered into license agreements with customers that include limited intellectual property indemnification clauses. Generally, the Company agrees to indemnify its customers against legal claims that the

Company’s software products infringe certain third party intellectual property rights. In the event of such a claim, the Company is generally obligated to defend its customers against the claim and either settle the claim at the Company’s expense or pay damages that its customers are legally required to pay to the third-party claimant. These intellectual property infringement indemnification clauses generally are subject to limits based upon the amount of the license sale. Additionally, the Company’s current end-user license agreement contains a limited software warranty. The Company has not made any indemnification payments in relation to these indemnification clauses.

In connection with certain facility leases, the Company has guaranteed payments on behalf of its subsidiaries either by providing a security deposit with the landlord or through unsecured bank guarantees obtained from local banks. ~~Additionally, the Company’s current end-user license agreement contains a limited software warranty.~~

The Company has not recorded a liability for guarantees, indemnities or warranties described above in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets since the maximum amount of potential future payments under such guarantees, indemnities and warranties is not determinable.

The Company is subject from time to time to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company’s management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2006, the Board approved, and the Company commenced implementing, restructuring activities to streamline its operations and consolidate its excess facilities (“Fiscal 2007 restructuring plan”). Total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the plan are expected to be approximately $7.0 million, of which $993,000 and $6.1 million has been recorded within Special charges in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. The charge consisted primarily of costs associated with workforce reduction and abandonment of excess facilities, and are expected to be paid by December 31, 2008, and August 31, 2010, respectively. However on a quarterly basis, the Company will conduct an evaluation of these balances and revise its assumptions and estimates, as appropriate.

The following table outlines restructuring charges incurred under the Fiscal 2007 restructuring plan, by segment, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007.

In the ~~first quarter of Fiscal 2006,~~three months ended September 30, 2005, the Board approved, and the Company began to implement restructuring activities to streamline its operations and consolidate its excess facilities (“Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan”). These charges relate to work force reductions, abandonment of excess facilities and other miscellaneous direct costs. ~~Total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan are expected to be approximately $22.0 million.~~ On a quarterly basis, the Company conducts an evaluation of these balances and revises its assumptions and estimates, as appropriate. In the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the Company recorded recoveries from special charges of ~~$468,000.~~$115,000 and $842,000, respectively. The provision related to workforce reduction is

~~UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share data)~~

expected to be ~~substantially~~ paid by ~~December 31, 2006,~~September 30, 2007, and the provisions relating to the abandonment of excess facilities, such as contract settlements and lease costs, are expected to be paid by January 2014.


													Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan	Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Balance as of June 30, 2006	$	2,685		$	4,135		$	9		$	6,829		$	2,685		$	4,135		$	9		$	6,829
Accruals (recoveries)		(256	)		(277	)		65			(468	)		(620	)		(324	)		102			(842	)
Cash payments		(1,042	)		(844	)		(74	)		(1,960	)		(1,817	)		(2,301	)		(112	)		(4,230	)
Foreign exchange and other adjustments		(15	)		40			—			25			(59	)		143			—			84

Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	1,372		$	3,054		$	—		$	4,426
Balance as of March 31, 2007													$	189		$	1,653		$	(1	)	$	1,841

The following ~~table outlines~~tables outline restructuring charges incurred and recovered under the Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan, by segment, for the ~~period~~three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006.~~March 31, 2007:


Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan – by Segment	Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
													Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan—by Segment
North America													$	—		$	17		$	—		$	17
Europe														(2	)		(157	)		27			(132	)

Total charge (recoveries) by segment for three months ended March 31, 2007													$	(2	)	$	(140	)	$	27		$	(115	)


													Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan—by Segment
North America	$	(181	)	$	(351	)	$	19		$	(513	)	$	(189	)	$	(320	)	$	19		$	(490	)
Europe		(67	)		74			51			58			(423	)		(4	)		88			(339	)
Other		(8	)		—			(5	)		(13	)		(8	)		—			(5	)		(13	)

Total charge (recovery) for period ended September 30, 2006	$	(256	)	$	(277	)	$	65		$	(468	)
Total charge (recoveries) by segment for the nine months ended March 31, 2007													$	(620	)	$	(324	)	$	102		$	(842	)

In the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $10 million relating primarily to its North America segment. The charge consisted primarily of costs associated with a workforce reduction, excess facilities associated with the integration of the IXOS acquisition, write downs of capital assets and legal costs related to the termination of facilities. All actions relating to employer workforce reductions were completed, and the related costs expended as of March 31, 2006. On a quarterly basis the Company conducts an evaluation of these balances and revises its assumptions and estimates, as appropriate. The provision for facility costs is expected to be substantially paid by 2011.

The activity of the Company’s provision for the 2004 restructuring charge is as follows for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006:~~March 31, 2007:


				Facility costs
Fiscal 2004 Restructuring Plan	Facility costs
Balance as of June 30, 2006	$	1,170		$	1,170
Cash payments		(133	)		(402	)
Foreign exchange and other adjustments		10			387

Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	1,047
Balance as of March 31, 2007				$	1,155

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

~~As of September 30, 2006, the Company owned 95.66% of the~~In March 2007, Open Text acquired all issued and outstanding shares of ~~IXOS.~~Momentum, a privately held company that specializes in providing Enterprise Content Management (“ECM”) solutions to U.S. government agencies. Open Text expects that the acquisition of Momentum will enhance its ability to provide services to the U.S. government market. In accordance with SFAS 141, this acquisition is accounted for as a business combination.

Established in 1993 and based in Arlington, Virginia, Momentum has been serving the government sector for more than 12 years by providing technical expertise to automate business processes. Momentum has used Open Text’s Livelink ECM software to develop integrated systems for its clients.

The results of operations of Momentum have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning March 2, 2007.

Consideration for this acquisition consisted of $4.7 million in cash, of which $4.4 million was paid at closing, and $300,000 was paid into escrow for a period of one year, as provided for in the share purchase agreement. The Company ~~increased its ownership~~additionally incurred approximately $280,000 in costs directly related to this acquisition. In addition, the Company paid an amount of $600,000 into escrow on account of a payment due to the former owner of Momentum in connection with his employment with the Company for a period of one year ending on March 1, 2008. This amount has been included as part of “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in these Interim Financial Statements and is being charged to operations over the 12 months commencing March 2, 2007.

Under business combination accounting the total purchase price was allocated to Momentum’s net assets, based on their estimated fair values as of March 2, 2007, as set forth below. The excess of the ~~shares~~purchase price over the net assets was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of ~~IXOS by way of open market purchases of IXOS shares, by 0.14% during the three months ended September 30, 2006. Total consideration paid for~~ the purchase price was based on a preliminary valuation, conducted by the Company’s management, and its estimates and assumptions are subject to change upon finalization, which is expected to occur prior to March 1, 2008.

The preliminary purchase price allocation set forth below represents management’s best estimate of ~~shares~~the allocation of ~~IXOS during~~ the ~~three months ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $333,000.~~ purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired.

The ~~minority interest in IXOS~~portion of the purchase price allocated to goodwill has been ~~adjusted~~assigned to ~~reflect~~ the ~~reduced minority interest ownership~~Company’s North America segment.

A director of the Company received approximately $90,000 in ~~IXOS.~~consulting fees for assistance with the acquisition of Momentum. These fees are included in the purchase price allocation. The director abstained from voting on the transaction.

~~On July 5,~~In October 2006, the Company announced its intention to make an offer to purchase all of the outstanding common shares of Hummingbird. On August 4, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Hummingbird under which the Company was to acquire all of Hummingbird’s outstanding common shares, for cash valued at $27.85 per share, or approximately $494.0 million. On October 2, 2006, the CompanyOpen Text acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hummingbird. ~~For further details relating to this acquisition see Note 18 “Subsequent Events” in these Notes to the Interim Financial Statements.~~

On August 4, 2006, Open Text entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hummingbird. On October 2, 2006, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hummingbird. Hummingbird is a global provider of enterprise software solutions. Open Text expects that the combination of the two companies towill strengthen its ability to offer an expanded portfolio of solutions aimed at a wide range of vertical markets. In accordance with SFAS 141, this acquisition ~~will be~~is accounted for as a business combination.

Hummingbird’s software offerings fall into two principal product families: (i) Hummingbird Enterprise, and (ii) Hummingbird Connectivity. The Company’s flagship offering, Hummingbird Enterprise, is an integrated ~~Enterprise Content Management~~ECM suite enabling users to capture, create, access, manage, share, find, extract, analyze, protect, publish and archive business content across the extended enterprise from anywhere in the world. Hummingbird Connectivity is a host access product suite that includes software applications for accessing mission-critical back office applications and related data from the majority of today’s systems, including mainframe, AS/400, Linux and UNIX platform environments.

The results of operations of Hummingbird ~~will be~~have been consolidated with those of Open Text beginning October 2, 2006.

Consideration for this acquisition, net of cash acquired, consisted of ~~approximately $494.0~~$412.5 million in cash ~~which includes $21.1~~including approximately $21.0 million associated with the open market purchases of Hummingbird ~~shares.~~shares acquired in June 2006 and an additional $6.4 million of direct acquisition related costs.

Under business combination accounting the total purchase price was allocated to Hummingbird’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets, based on their estimated fair values as of October 2, 2006, as set forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price was based on a preliminary valuation, conducted by the Company’s management, and its estimates and assumptions are subject to change upon finalization, which is expected to occur prior to October 1, 2007.

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of U.S. ~~Dollars,~~dollars, except per share data)

~~On October 2, 2006,~~The purchase price allocation set forth below represents management’s best estimate of the Company established the Hummingbird Stock Option Plan to provide long-term incentives to attract, motivate and retain certain key: (i) employees, (ii) officers and directors, and (iii) consultants of Hummingbird. Approximately 355,675 options were granted by the Company during October 2006 under this plan.

~~The preliminary~~ allocation of the purchase price toand the fair value of net assets ~~acquired had not~~acquired.

The useful lives of both the customer and technology assets have been ~~concluded as~~estimated to be seven years each.

The portion of the ~~date~~purchase price allocated to goodwill was assigned in the ratio of 56%, 40% and 4% to the Company’s North America, Europe and Other segments, respectively. No amount of the ~~filing~~goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

As part of the purchase price allocation, the Company recognized liabilities in connection with this acquisition of approximately $38.4 million relating primarily to employee termination charges, costs relating to abandonment of excess Hummingbird facilities and accruals for direct acquisition related costs. This was the result of management approved and initiated plans to restructure the operations of Hummingbird, commencing at the time of acquisition, to eliminate duplicative activities and to reduce costs. The Company will continue to evaluate and identify any material duplicative Hummingbird activities and areas where costs may be reduced during the remainder of the purchase price allocation period and include these in the determination of the fair value of this ~~Quarterly Report under Form 10-Q.~~acquisition. The ~~Company expects the preliminary allocation~~liability relating to abandonment of excess facilities is expected to be ~~completed~~paid over the terms of the various leases, the last of which expires in March 2011. The liabilities related to employee termination costs are expected to be substantially paid on or before ~~December 15, 2006.~~

~~As of~~the quarter ended September 30, ~~2006, a~~2007. For further details relating to the type and amounts of these liabilities see Note 7 “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” to the Interim Financial Statements.

A director of the Company ~~earned~~received approximately ~~$100,000~~$351,000 in consulting fees for assistance with the acquisition of Hummingbird. These fees ~~will be~~are included in the purchase price allocation. The director abstained from voting on the ~~Hummingbird acquisition~~ transaction.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company owned 95.90% of the outstanding shares of IXOS. The Company increased its ownership of the shares of IXOS by way of open market purchases by 0.38% during the nine months ended March 31, 2007. Total consideration paid for the purchase of shares of IXOS during the three and ~~termination~~nine months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $219,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. The minority interest in IXOS has been adjusted to reflect the reduced minority interest ownership in IXOS.

(Tabular dollar amounts in thousands of ~~existing $40 million line~~U.S. dollars, except per share data)

On ~~October~~May 2, ~~2006,~~2007, the Company ~~entered into a $465.0~~announced that it would make an additional payment of $30.0 million ~~Credit Agreement with a Canadian chartered bank (the “Bank”), consisting of a $390.0 million~~against its term loan ~~facility (the “Term Loan”) and a $75.0 million committed revolving term credit facility (the “Revolver”).~~

The Term Loan repayments are equal to approximately $4.7 million per year, paid quarterly for a period of 7 years, with the remainder due at the end of the term. The Term Loan contains floating and fixed rate interest options. The Revolver has a 5 year term with no fixed repayment date prior to the end of the term.

On October 2, 2006, the Company terminated its CDN $40.0 million line of credit with the Bank. The Company was required to terminate this line of credit prior to executing the Credit Agreement. As of the date of termination, there were no borrowings outstanding on the CDN $40.0 million line of credit, nor were there any termination penalties.during May 2007.

On ~~October 5, 2006,~~May 2, 2007 Open Text filed a notice of intention with the ~~Company committed~~Ontario Securities Commission to make a ~~plan~~normal course issuer bid to ~~terminate various employees and abandon certain excess facilities (the “exit plan”~~repurchase a maximum of 2,494,053 Open Text Common Shares on the NASDAQ (hereinafter referred to as the “May 2007 Repurchase Program”). ~~The Company expects to incur severance~~Purchases under the May 2007 Repurchase Program will commence on or after May 7, 2007, will be determined by the Board of Directors of Open Text and ~~other employee termination costs as well as contract termination costs. The Company expects to determine the estimates~~will be made in accordance with rules and policies of the ~~amounts expected to be incurred in connection with~~NASDAQ. The May 2007 Repurchase Program supersedes the ~~exit plan~~May 2006 Repurchase Program and will terminate on ~~or before December 31, 2006.~~

On October 27, 2006, the Squeeze Out was registered in the Commercial Register in the Local Court of Hamburg. For further details relating to the Squeeze Out refer to Note 15 “Commitments and Contingencies” in these Notes to the Interim Financial Statements.May 6, 2008.

~~Item 2.~~

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation~~

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is subject to the safe harbors created by those sections. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “might,” “will” and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, performance or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed herein and in the notes to our financial statements for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, certain sections of which are incorporated herein by reference as set forth in Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this report. The actual results that we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements. You should carefully review Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” and other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A number of factors may materially affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. These factors include but are not limited to those set forth in Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. Any one of these factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from recent results or from our anticipated future results. You should not rely too heavily on the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, because these forward-looking statements are relevant only as of the date they were made.

In March 2007, we acquired 100% of all issued and outstanding Common Shares of Momentum, a privately held company based in Arlington, Virginia, which has been serving the government sector for over 12 years. With an experienced staff, located primarily in the Washington D.C area, Momentum has had a successful track record of implementing and supporting our Livelink ECM solutions across all levels of government. We ~~are~~believe this acquisition will add to our government domain expertise and further enhance our ability to deliver valuable government solutions.

Consideration for this acquisition consisted of $4.7 million in cash (net of cash acquired), of which $4.4 million was paid at closing, and $300,000 was paid into escrow for a period of one year, as provided for in the share purchase agreement. We additionally incurred approximately $280,000 in costs directly related to this acquisition. In addition, we paid an amount of $600,000 into escrow on account of a payment due to the ~~market leaders~~former owner of Momentum in ~~providing Enterprise Content Management (“ECM”) solutions that bring together people, processes and information. Our software combines collaboration~~connection with ~~content management, transforming information into knowledge that provides the foundation~~his employment with us for ~~innovation, compliance and accelerated growth.~~a period of one year ending on March 1, 2008.

OnIn October 2, 2006, we ~~successfully closed~~completed the ~~purchase~~acquisition of Hummingbird, a Toronto, Ontario, based, global provider of ECM solutions. This transaction was the culmination of an offer made by us, onin July 2006 to purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares of this company.

The approximate value of this all cash transaction was ~~$494.0~~$412.5 million, ~~inclusive~~net of ~~our earlier purchase, in June 2006, of approximately 4.3% of issued and outstanding shares of~~cash acquired from Hummingbird.

The transaction was financed by way of a $390.0 million term loan facility from a Canadian chartered bank, Hummingbird’s cash in the amount of approximately $58.0 million and the rest through the use of our available cash.

We believe that this acquisition will enhance our size and global reach and will further solidify our position as a leading provider of ECM solutions. ~~The~~We believe the union of Open Text and Hummingbird will ~~now~~ strengthen our ability to reach a wider, more diversified audience, ~~and as such we believe the acquisition of Hummingbird will~~ create a strong strategic fit that adds to our “solutions focus”, and ~~will~~ increase the reach of our global partner program.

In October 2006, we announced a restructuring plan that involves, primarily, workforce reductions, real estate optimization and legal entity reorganization. This plan involved and impacted legacy Hummingbird operations and the operations of the combined companies.

In February, we hosted “Summit 2007”, which is the worldwide user conference for Hummingbird customers and partners. At this conference we unveiled details of our next generation ECM offering, codenamed DMX. This product represents the convergence of Open Text and Hummingbird technologies. With DMX, customers will have the opportunity to take advantage of broader sets of Open Text applications, while still being able to maximize the values that they have invested in their Hummingbird enterprise deployments.

In April we hosted two “LiveLinkUp Europe” events; one in Munich and one in London, where we outlined our strategic vision for ECM and how the broader new capabilities in Livelink ECM 10 will help customers achieve enterprise transparency, leveraging it for business advantages.

Our records management offerings continue to drive our strategic relations and tight integration with partners, such as Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), Oracle Inc. (“Oracle”) and SAP AG (“SAP”). The introduction of Livelink ECM^™—Records Management for use with SAP^® applications was one of our significant announcements made in the third quarter. It will be marketed and supported by SAP and Open Text. U.S. federal government customers of SAP and Open Text will now have a fully integrated solution to help them implement comprehensive records management programs.

We rely on close cooperation with partners for sales and product development, as well as for the optimization of opportunities which arise in our competitive environment.

We continue to make significant progress with our global partner program, with emphasis on developing strategic relations and tight integration with partners, such as Microsoft, Oracle and SAP. Our revenue from partners has more than doubled in the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. Partner revenue was approximately 37% of total revenue for the current quarter.

We anticipate that our customers will continue to look for comprehensive ECM solutions that are fast, easy to deploy, and highly scalable. Overall we are seeing our pipeline continuing to build, driven across the product portfolio by the need for compliance and regulatory specific solutions.

The following table presents an overview of our selected financial ~~data.~~data for the periods indicated.


	Three months ended September 30,											Three months ended March 31,						Change in $			% Change
(in thousands)	2006			2005			Change in $			% Change		2007			2006						% Change
Total revenue	$	101,155		$	92,630		$	8,525		9.2	%	$	156,052		$	100,926		Change in $	$	55,126		54.6	%
Cost of revenue		34,239			33,083			1,156		3.5	%		54,421			35,573			18,848		53.0	%
Gross profit		66,916			59,547			7,369		12.4	%		101,631			65,353			36,278		55.5	%
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		2,382			2,222			160		7.2	%		7,396			2,298			5,098		221.8	%
Special charges (recoveries)		(468	)		18,111			(18,579	)	(102.6	%)		878			(557	)		1,435		(257.6	)%
Other operating expenses		53,995			55,801			(1,806	)	(3.2	%)		79,818			52,734			27,084		51.4	%
Income (loss) from operations		11,007			(16,587	)		27,594		N/A
Income from operations													13,539			10,878			2,661		24.5	%
Net income													3,853			7,322			(3,469	)	(47.4	)%
Gross margin													65.1	%		64.8	%

												Nine months ended March 31,
(in thousands)												2007			2006			Change in $			% Change
Total revenue												$	420,468		$	304,327		$	116,141		38.2	%
Cost of revenue													144,145			105,555			38,590		36.6	%
Gross profit													276,323			198,772			77,551		39.0	%
Amortization of acquired intangible assets													17,147			6,825			10,322		151.2	%
Special charges													5,253			26,347			(21,094	)	(80.1	)%
Other operating expenses													219,613			164,718			54,895		33.3	%
Income from operations													34,310			882			33,428		3,790.0	%
Net income (loss)		7,301			(12,868	)		20,169		N/A			13,431			(2,825	)		16,256		N/A
Gross margin		66.2	%		64.3	%							65.7	%		65.3	%
Operating margin		10.9	%		(17.9	%)

~~In Fiscal~~As a result of our acquisition of Hummingbird, we have included the financial results of Hummingbird in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“Interim Financial Statements”) beginning October 2, 2006, the date we ~~announced that our operational focus was on increasing near-term profitability by streamlining our operations. In~~acquired 100% of the ~~first quarter of Fiscal 2006, our Board approved~~issued and we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate our excess facilities, (“Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan”). In this current quarter of Fiscal 2007, we are pleased to see our efforts materializing. Revenue has increased by 9.2%outstanding shares. The fluctuations in the ~~three months ended September 30, 2006~~operating results in the current periods, compared towith the same period in the prior fiscal year, ~~while costs of revenue have increased only slightly by 3.5% in the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared~~are generally due to the ~~same period in the prior fiscal year. As a result we have seen our gross profit increase~~synergies generated by over 12.0% compared to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year. We believe our Fiscal 2006 restructuring initiative has been successful and we expect to continue to see savings in Fiscal 2007. Absent the impact of the restructuring initiative, operating income increased by $9.0 million, in the current quarter compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, due to a combination of stronger gross margins and a general decrease in operating loss in the aftermath of the restructuring initiative.

Going forward we will continue to strive to provide customers with an independent alternative to manage information in a compliant and transparent way, while ensuring that content is safe, searchable and readily accessible. We have already taken steps to solidify our position with the acquisition of Hummingbird. In addition, we are seeing the ECM market growing by approximately 8% to 12% a year. With the acquisition of FileNet Inc. by IBM Corporation, in August 2006, we are now positioned as one of the largest independent providers of ECM solutions in the market, and we think that our independence will help us to compete more effectively, primarily because system integrators will appreciate our neutrality and will want to work with us, over vendors who may be seen as competitors.

We will also continue to adapt to market changes in the ECM sector by developing new solutions, leveraging our existing solutions and utilizing our partner programs to reach new customers, and to serve existing customers more effectively. We also expect to announce the “formal” release of Livelink ECM version 10.0, our next major product release, during the second quarter of Fiscal 2007. Livelink 10.0 is a higher “value-added” application that will offer the ability to connect with or interact with various platforms from other vendors.

this acquisition. An analysis of each of the components of our “Results of Operations” ~~follows:~~follows.

Immediately upon the acquisition of Hummingbird, Open Text restructured both Hummingbird and pre-acquisition Open Text operations into one combined organization. Sales forces were aligned by either a combined vertical or geography. All back office functions such as accounting and information technology were combined to manage both operations. Our research and development teams quickly prepared integration code to combine products and features between previous Hummingbird and Open Text products. Most former Hummingbird executive management and many next levels of management personnel were terminated and primarily Open Text management assumed all responsibilities for sales, service, research and development, and general and administrative activities. In view of the shared resources, single line management and combined operations, presentation of the results of operations of Open Text and Hummingbird separately is not meaningful to this analysis.

The following tables set forth our revenues by product and as a percentage of the related product revenue for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended September 30,										Three months ended March 31,								Nine months ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2006			2005			Change in $		% Change
(in thousands)											2007		2006		Change in $		% Change		2007		2006		Change in $		% Change
License	$	28,825		$	24,943		$	3,882	15.6	%	$	43,032	$	28,415	$	14,617	51.4	%	$	123,282	$	90,489	$	32,793	36.2	%
Customer support		48,288			45,324			2,964	6.5	%		79,042		45,966		33,076	72.0	%		205,352		136,656		68,696	50.3	%
Services		24,042			22,363			1,679	7.5	%
Service												33,978		26,545		7,433	28.0	%		91,834		77,182		14,652	19.0	%

Total	$	101,155		$	92,630		$	8,525	9.2	%	$	156,052	$	100,926	$	55,126	54.6	%	$	420,468	$	304,327	$	116,141	38.2	%


	Three months ended September 30,
(% of total revenue)	2006			2005
License		28.5	%		26.9	%
Customer support		47.7	%		48.9	%
Services		23.8	%		24.2	%

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%

License ~~revenue consists~~revenues consist of fees earned from the licensing of software products to customers.

~~License revenue increased in~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, license revenues increased by approximately $14.6 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily ~~due to increases~~as a result of growth in ~~license sales in Europe—~~our North American operations. Of the total growth achieved this quarter, North America accounted for 62.3% of the increase, followed by Europe, which contributed ~~to 90% of this increase along with an 11% increase~~37.0% and the remaining growth was contributed by ~~“Other” countries and offset~~the Other segment.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, license revenues increased by $32.8 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a ~~slight decrease~~result of growth in our European license sales. Of the total growth, Europe contributed 54.9%, followed by North America, ~~of 1%. Overall, we generated 35% of license revenue from new customers.~~which added 39.6% and the remaining Other segment contributed approximately 5.5% to the year-to-date growth.

Customer support ~~revenue consists~~revenues consist of revenue from our customer support and maintenance agreements. These agreements allow our customers to receive technical support, enhancements and upgrades to new versions of our software products when and if available. Customer support ~~revenue is~~revenues are generated from such support and maintenance agreements relating to current year sales of software products and from the renewal of existing maintenance agreements for software licenses sold in prior periods. As our installed base grows, the renewal rate has a larger influence on customer support revenue than the current software revenue growth. Therefore, changes in customer support ~~revenue~~revenues do not necessarily correlate directly to the changes in license revenue in a given period. Typically the term of these support and maintenance agreements is twelve months, with customer renewal options. We have historically experienced a renewal rate over 90% but continue to encounter pricing pressure from our customers during contract negotiation and renewal. New license sales create additional customer support agreements which contribute substantially to the increase in our customer support revenue.

~~Customer support revenue increased in~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily because we saw, (and in almost equal amounts), increases in North America and Europe, offset~~March 31, 2007, customer support revenues increased by ~~a marginal decrease in the other countries.~~

~~Service revenue consists of revenues from consulting contracts and contracts to provide training and integration services.~~

Service revenue grew modestly in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. We are pleased to see such growth, as historically service revenue is lower in the first quarter of the fiscal year due to both our employees and our customers taking vacation time during this period, resulting in lower billable hours. We continue to see demand in North America for our SAP related ECM services, with revenue from North America growing by approximately 12%. We expect this trend to continue in the future. Our growth in North America was offset by a decrease in revenue from our global services outside of North America.

~~The following table sets forth information regarding our revenue by geography.~~

Overall, we have seen increased revenue growth in all three segments in which we operate. In the three months ended September 30, 2006, we have increased the number of our deal transactions by 5%, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. In addition, 11% of our transactions were the result of our global partner program, reinforcing our belief that our program continues to be successful.

~~The North America geographic segment includes Canada, the United States and Mexico.~~

~~Revenues in North America increased in the three months ended September 30, 2006,~~$33.1 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of ~~the~~growth in our North American ~~market showing greater interest in our ECM~~

operations. Of the total growth achieved this quarter, North America accounted for 53.0% of the increase, followed by Europe, which contributed 42.4% and ~~SAP solutions. Overall, 48% of our revenue was generated from~~the remaining Other segment contributed 4.6% to this ~~segment in~~growth.

~~The Europe geographic segment includes Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.~~

~~Revenues in Europe~~March 31, 2007, customer support revenues increased ~~strongly in the three months ended September 30, 2006,~~by $68.7 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of ~~significant~~ growth ~~in license and customer service revenues in~~from Europe. ~~We did particularly well in both~~Of the UKtotal growth, Europe contributed 50.1%, followed closely by North America, which contributed 46.5% and the ~~Nordic regions, however,~~remaining contribution came from our Other segment, which added 3.4% to the ~~rest of Europe also met their targets.~~overall growth.

~~The “other” geographic segment includes Australia, Japan, Malaysia,~~Service revenues consist of revenues from consulting contracts and ~~the Middle East region.~~contracts to provide training and integration services.

~~Revenues from our “other” segments increased only slightly in~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, service revenues increased by $7.4 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of growth in our European operations. Of the total growth achieved this quarter, Europe accounted for 60.0% of the increase, followed by North America, which contributed 33.3% and the remaining Other segment contributed 6.7% to this growth.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, service revenues increased by $14.7 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of growth from Europe. Of the total growth, Europe contributed 56.8%, followed closely by North America, which contributed 42.5% and the remaining contribution came from our Other segment.

In the three and nine months ended, March 31, 2007, our total revenues have increased by approximately $55.1 million and $116.1 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year.

North America revenues increased when compared with the proportionate contributions of Europe and “Other” primarily due to higher North America license and customer support revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.

~~The following table provides~~On a ~~summary of the Company’s adjusted operating margins by significant segment.~~

~~Our adjusted operating margins have increased in all geographies in the first quarter of Fiscal 2007~~current year to date basis, compared to the same period in ~~Fiscal 2006~~the prior fiscal year, Europe revenues increased in proportion to North America and “Other” on account of ~~our customers being increasingly interested~~increased product revenues in ~~purchasing a complete ECM platform which generally involves a larger dollar value transaction. This has the effect of lengthening lead times for new and existing opportunities.~~all three product types.

Adjusted operating margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. Such non-GAAP financial measures have certain limitations in that they do not have a standardized meaning and thus our definition may be different from similar non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. We use this financial measure to supplement the information provided in our consolidated financial statements, which are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The presentation of adjusted operating margin is not meant to be a substitute for net income presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, but rather should be evaluated in conjunction with and as a supplement to such U.S. GAAP measures. Adjusted operating margin is calculated based on net income before including the impact of amortization of acquired intangibles, special charges, other income/expense, share-based compensation expenses“Other” geographic segment, reflected above, includes Australia, Japan, Malaysia, and the provision for taxes. These items are excluded based upon the manner in which our management evaluates our business. We believe the provision of this non-GAAP measure allows our investors to evaluate the operational and financial performance of our core business using the same evaluation measures that we use to make decisions. As such we believe this non-GAAP measure is a useful indication of our performance or expected performance of recurring operations and may facilitate period-to-period comparisons of operating performance.Middle East region.

~~A reconciliation of our adjusted operating margin to net income as reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP is provided below:~~

The following tables set forth the changes in cost of revenues and gross margin by product type for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended September 30,											Three months ended March 31,									Nine months ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2006			2005			Change in $			% Change
(in thousands)												2007		2006		Change in $			% Change		2007		2006		Change in $		% Change
License	$	2,800		$	2,388		$	412		17.3	%	$	3,515	$	3,900	$	(385	)	(9.9	%)	$	9,637	$	8,099	$	1,538	19.0	%
Customer Support		6,731			7,029			(298	)	(4.2	%)
Customer support													12,431		7,103		5,328		75.0	%		31,821		21,595		10,226	47.4	%
Service		19,862			19,035			827		4.3	%		28,042		19,840		8,202		41.3	%		77,012		61,848		15,164	24.5	%
Amortization of acquired technology intangible assets		4,846			4,631			215		4.6	%		10,433		4,730		5,703		120.6	%		25,675		14,013		11,662	83.2	%

Total	$	34,239		$	33,083		$	1,156		3.5	%	$	54,421	$	35,573	$	18,848		53.0	%	$	144,145	$	105,555	$	38,590	36.6	%


	Three months ended September 30,
Gross Margin (% of revenue)	2006			2005
License		90.3	%		90.4	%
Customer Support		86.1	%		84.5	%
Service		17.4	%		14.9	%

Cost of license ~~revenue~~revenues consists primarily of royalties payable to third parties, ~~and~~ product media duplication, instruction manuals and packaging expenses.

Cost of license revenues increased ~~marginally~~ in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, as a direct result of the incremental impact of Hummingbird. The increase in the gross margin for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to higher royalty and third party costs, in correlation with the increased license revenue we saw in this quarterMarch 31, 2007, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year.~~year, was due to an overall reduction of reseller fees and reliance on third party products. The gross margins for the nine months ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, were relatively stable, both within the 91% to 93% range.

Cost of customer support revenues is comprised primarily of technical support personnel and related costs.

Cost of customer support revenues ~~decreased slightly~~increased in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, as a direct result of the incremental impact of Hummingbird. The gross margins for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior fiscal year ~~primarily as~~were relatively stable, all within the ~~result of a decrease in labor and labor related expenses.~~85% range.

Cost of service revenues consists primarily of the costs of providing integration, customization and training with respect to our various software products. The most significant component of these costs is personnel and related expenses. The other components include travel costs and third party subcontracting.

Cost of service revenues increased in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, as a direct result of the incremental impact of Hummingbird. Gross margins for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 declined compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior fiscal year, as a result of the increased ~~revenues. The increase in~~ costs ~~was lower than the increase in revenues, which favorably increased services’ gross margins in the current quarter compared~~due to the ~~same period in the prior year. This favorable increase in margins was in part due to a reclassification~~integration and reorganization of revenue and expenses we made between Customer support and Service. For further details regarding this reclassification please see Note 1 “Basis of Presentation” under Part I of this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Amortization of acquired intangible assets includes the amortization of patents and customer assets. Amortization of acquired technology is included as an element of cost of sales. The slight increase in amortization of acquired technology intangible assets in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, is primarily the result of additional amortization resulting from the increase in our ~~ownership of IXOS.~~combined entity.

The following table sets forth total operating expenses by function and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended September 30,											Three months ended March 31,									Nine months ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2006			2005			$ Change			% Change
(in thousands)												2007		2006			$ Change		% Change		2007		2006		$ Change			% Change
Research and development	$	14,179		$	15,745		$	(1,566	)	(9.9	%)	$	21,176	$	14,153		$	7,023	49.6	%	$	57,950	$	44,824	$	13,126		29.3	%
Sales and marketing		24,557			24,901			(344	)	(1.4	%)		39,069		24,677			14,392	58.3	%		107,450		78,562		28,888		36.8	%
General and administrative		12,267			12,646			(379	)	(3.0	%)		15,947		11,210			4,737	42.3	%		43,688		33,298		10,390		31.2	%
Depreciation		2,992			2,509			483		19.3	%		3,626		2,694			932	34.6	%		10,525		8,034		2,491		31.0	%
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		2,382			2,222			160		7.2	%		7,396		2,298			5,098	221.8	%		17,147		6,825		10,322		151.2	%
Special charges (recoveries)		(468	)		18,111			(18,579	)	(102.6	%)		878		(557	)		1,435	N/A			5,253		26,347		(21,094	)	N/A

Total	$	55,909		$	76,134		$	(20,225	)	(26.6	%)	$	88,092	$	54,475		$	33,617	61.7	%	$	242,013	$	197,890	$	44,123		22.3	%


	Three months ended September 30,
(in % of total revenue)	2006			2005
Research and development		14.0	%		17.0	%
Sales and marketing		24.3	%		26.9	%
General and administrative		12.1	%		13.7	%
Depreciation		3.0	%		2.7	%
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		2.4	%		2.4	%
Special charges		(0.5	%)		19.6	%

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses consist primarily of engineering personnel expenses, contracted research and development expenses, and ~~facility~~facilities and equipment costs.

~~Research and development expenses decreased by $1.6 million in~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, R&D expenses increased by $7.0 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year~~year. This increase is primarily ~~due~~attributable to ~~a decrease~~an increase in ~~our labor~~R&D headcount of 268 employees. This increase in staff translates into an increase of approximately $5.4 million in direct labour and ~~labor~~approximately $1.1 million in associated labour benefits and expenses. The remaining increase is attributed to normal operating expenses.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, R&D expenses increased by $13.1 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. This increase is predominantly attributable to an increase in direct labour of approximately $11.4 million and labour related expenses ~~as a result~~ of ~~our Fiscal 2006 restructuring initiative.~~approximately $2.3 million.

Sales and marketing expenses mainly consist ~~primarily~~ of personnel expenses and costs associated with advertising and trade shows.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, sales and marketing expenses increased by $14.4 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year, primarily due~~year. This increase is largely attributable to ~~a decrease~~an increase in sales and marketing headcount of ~~labor~~201 employees. This increase in staff translates into an increase of approximately $6.2 million in direct labour and ~~overhead~~approximately $2.1 million in associated labour benefits and ~~office~~ expenses. ~~The decrease in these~~Travel, marketing and commission expenses ~~was~~contributed to an increase of approximately $6.0 million on account of an increase to the breadth of our product portfolio and an expansion of our normal business activities as a result of our ~~Fiscal 2006 restructuring initiative. The decrease was partially offset~~fiscal 2007 acquisitions.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, sales and marketing expenses increased by $28.9 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in direct labour of approximately $11.9 million and labour related expenses of approximately $5.1 million. Travel, marketing and commission expenses contributed to an increase of approximately $11.4 million on account of an increase to the breadth of our ~~commission~~product portfolio and ~~other related operating expenses,~~an expansion of our normal business activities as ~~the~~a result of ~~normal business activity.~~our fiscal 2007 acquisitions.

General and administrative expenses mainly consist ~~primarily~~ of salaries of administrative personnel, related overhead, facility expenses, audit fees, consulting expenses and public company costs.

~~General and administrative expenses decreased slightly by $379,000 in~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, general and administrative expenses increased by $4.7 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. This increase is partially due to an increase in general and administrative headcount of 88 employees. This increase in staff translates into an increase in direct labour expenses of approximately $2.5 million and labour related benefits and expenses of approximately $500,000. The ~~decrease was primarily~~remaining increase in general and administrate expenses related to miscellaneous operating activities associated with the expanded scale of the business.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, general and administrative expenses increased by $10.4 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. This increase is partially due to an increase in direct labour of approximately $6.8 million, and labour related expenses of approximately $2.4 million. The remaining increase in general and administrative expenses related to miscellaneous operating activities associated with the expanded scale of the business.

Accounts Receivable (“AR”) and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (“AfDA”):

As a result of ~~savings from~~ our ~~compliance and regulatory fees,~~October 2006 purchase of Hummingbird, our AfDA, on a “combined” company basis, increased by approximately $17.6 million of which we ~~achieved as~~wrote off $7.2 million and $3.0 million, for the ~~result of efficiencies gained~~quarters ended December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007 respectively, in connection with AR that emanated from ~~operating improvements.~~pre-acquisition date transactions that we determined were uncollectible. See Note 10 “Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Unbilled Receivables” to the Interim Financial Statements for additional information relating to legacy Hummingbird AfDA.

On July 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value-based method for measurement and cost recognition of employee share-based compensation under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No 123 (Revised 2004) “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS ~~123R,~~123R”), using the modified prospective application transitional approach. Previously, we had been accounting for employee share-based compensation using the intrinsic value method, which generally did not result in any compensation cost being recorded for stock options since the exercise price was equal to the market price of the underlying shares on the date of grant. ~~Under~~

Our stock options are now accounted for under SFAS ~~123R, we estimate the~~123R. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the ~~weighted-average~~ fair value of ~~options granted, as of the grant date,~~each option was ~~$7.50~~estimated using the following ~~weighted~~ weighted–average assumptions: expected volatility of ~~47%~~45.0%; risk-free interest rate of ~~4.3%~~4.7%; expected dividend yield of 0%0.0%; and expected life of ~~4.5~~5.0 years. For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the fair value of each option was estimated using the following weighted–average assumptions: expected volatility of 46.0%; risk-free interest rate of 4.6%; expected dividend yield of 0.0%; and expected life of 4.8 years. Expected option lives and volatilities are based on our historical data.

~~We granted no stock options during~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2005.~~March 31, 2006, the fair value of each option was estimated using the following weighted–average assumptions: expected volatility of 54.0%; risk-free interest rate of 4.4%; expected dividend yield of 0.0%; and expected life of 5.5 years. For the nine months ended March 31, 2006, the fair value of each option was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions: expected volatility of 55.0%; risk-free interest rate of 4.4%; expected dividend yield of 0.0%; and expected life of 5.5 years.

Share-based compensation cost included in the ~~statement~~unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the ~~quarter~~three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 was approximately ~~$1.3 million. Additionally,~~$1.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively, net of related tax effects. This includes deferred tax assets of ~~$171,000 were recorded as of September 30, 2006~~$243,000 and $627,000 for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 respectively, in relation to the tax effect of certain stock options that are eligible for a tax deduction when exercised. As of ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized ~~is $10.9~~was $12.5 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.

Share-based compensation cost included in the statement of income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 was approximately $1.4 million. Additionally, deferred tax assets of $169,000 were recorded, as of September 30, 2005 in relationWe made no modifications to the ~~tax effect~~terms of ~~certain stock~~our outstanding share options that are eligible for a tax deduction when exercised. As of September 30, 2005, the total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized was $10.6 million which is to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.

~~Depreciation expenses increased marginally~~ in ~~three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, due to the inclusion~~anticipation of the ~~deprecation~~adoption of SFAS 123R. Also, we made no changes in either the quantity or type of instruments used in our share option plans or the terms of our ~~Waterloo building on which depreciation commenced only in the second quarter of Fiscal 2006.~~share option plans.

Amortization of acquired intangible assets includes the amortization of ~~patents and~~ customer assets. Amortization of acquired technology is included as an element of cost of sales. ~~The increase in~~

For the three months ended March 31, 2007, amortization of acquired intangible assets ~~in the three months ended September 30, 2006,~~increased $5.1 million, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year, is~~year. For the ~~result~~nine months ended March 31, 2007, amortization of ~~additional amortization resulting from~~acquired intangible assets increased $10.3 million, compared to the ~~increase~~same period in ~~our ownership~~the prior fiscal year. These increases are due to the impact of ~~IXOS.~~the Hummingbird acquisition.

~~On October 5,~~In December 2006, our Board approved, and we ~~committed~~commenced implementing, restructuring activities to ~~a plan to terminate various employees~~streamline our operations and ~~abandon certain real estate~~consolidate our excess facilities ~~as part of our integration with Hummingbird. We are currently in the process of determining the estimates~~

~~of the amounts expected~~(“Fiscal 2007 restructuring plan”). Total costs to be incurred in ~~connection~~conjunction with this initiative. As part of this integration, we are reducing our worldwide workforce of 3,500 people by approximately 15 percent. The restructuring actions commenced in October 2006 and to date, approximately 60 percent of these reductions have been completed. The remaining staff reductionsthe plan are expected to be ~~completed~~approximately $7.0 million, of which $993,000 and $6.1 million has been recorded within Special charges in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007,

respectively. The charge consisted primarily of costs associated with workforce reduction and abandonment of excess facilities, and are expected to be paid by ~~the end~~December 31, 2008, and August 31, 2010, respectively. However on a quarterly basis, we will conduct an evaluation of ~~November, 2006. The staff reductions will be focused on redundant positions or areas~~these balances and revise our assumptions and estimates, as appropriate.

A reconciliation of the ~~business that are not consistent with~~beginning and ending liability is shown below:

The following table outlines restructuring charges incurred under our Fiscal 2007 restructuring plan, by segment, for the ~~company’s strategic focus. We are also reducing 38 facilities by closing or consolidating offices in certain locations.~~nine months ended March 31, 2007.

In the ~~first quarter of Fiscal 2006,~~three months ended September 30, 2005, our Board approved, and we began to implement restructuring activities to streamline our operations and consolidate our excess facilities (“Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan”). These charges relate to work force reductions, abandonment of excess facilities and other miscellaneous direct costs. ~~Total costs to be incurred in conjunction with the Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan are expected to be approximately $22.0 million.~~ On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of these balances and revise our assumptions and estimates, as appropriate. In the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, we recorded recoveries from special charges of ~~$468,000.~~$115,000 and $842,000, respectively. The provision related to workforce reduction is expected to be ~~substantially~~ paid by ~~December 31, 2006~~September 30, 2007, and the provisions relating to the abandonment of excess facilities, such as contract settlements and lease costs, are expected to be paid by January 2014.


													Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan	Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Balance as of June 30, 2006	$	2,685		$	4,135		$	9		$	6,829		$	2,685		$	4,135		$	9		$	6,829
Accruals (recoveries)		(256	)		(277	)		65			(468	)		(620	)		(324	)		102			(842	)
Cash payments		(1,042	)		(844	)		(74	)		(1,960	)		(1,817	)		(2,301	)		(112	)		(4,230	)
Foreign exchange and other adjustments		(15	)		40			—			25			(59	)		143			—			84

Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	1,372		$	3,054		$	—		$	4,426
Balance as of March 31, 2007													$	189		$	1,653		$	(1	)	$	1,841

The following table outlines ~~the~~ restructuring charges we incurred and recovered under ~~the~~our Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan, by segment, for the ~~period~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006.~~March 31, 2007.


	Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan—by Segment
North America	$	(189	)	$	(320	)	$	19		$	(490	)
Europe		(423	)		(4	)		88			(339	)
Other		(8	)		—			(5	)		(13	)

Total charge (recoveries) by segment for the nine months ended March 31, 2007	$	(620	)	$	(324	)	$	102		$	(842	)

In the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recorded a restructuring charge of approximately ~~$10~~$10.0 million relating primarily to our North America ~~segment.~~segment (“Fiscal 2004 Restructuring Plan”). The charge consisted primarily of costs associated with a workforce reduction, excess facilities associated with the integration of the IXOS acquisition, write downs of capital assets and legal costs related to the termination of facilities. All actions relating to employer workforce reductions were completed, and the related costs expended as of March 31, 2006. On a quarterly basis, we conduct an evaluation of these balances and we revise our assumptions and estimates, as appropriate. ~~All actions relating to work force reduction were completed, and the related costs expended, as of March 31, 2006.~~ The provision for ~~our~~ facility costs is expected to be ~~expended~~substantially paid by 2011.

The activity of ~~our~~the provision for the Fiscal 2004 restructuring ~~charge~~Plan is as follows for the ~~period presented below:~~nine months ended March 31, 2007:


				Facility costs
Fiscal 2004 Restructuring Plan	Facility costs
Balance as of June 30, 2006	$	1,170		$	1,170
Cash payments		(133	)		(402	)
Foreign exchange and other adjustments		10			387

Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	1,047
Balance as of March 31, 2007				$	1,155

We recorded a ~~tax~~ provision for income taxes of ~~$4.3~~$1.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 compared to ~~a recovery of $4.4~~$2.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2005.~~March 31, 2006. This ~~is as a result of positive net income~~decrease in the ~~current quarter (versus a loss in the same period in the prior fiscal year) and the impact of~~provision for income taxes is related to higher income being earned in jurisdictions with a ~~higher~~lower statutory rate.

Our deferred tax assets, totaling $247.5 million, are based upon available income tax losses and future income tax deductions. Our ability to use these income tax losses and future income tax deductions is dependent upon us generating income in the tax jurisdictions in which such losses or deductions arose. The recognized deferred tax liability of $113.7 million is primarily made up of three components. The first component relates to $106.8 million arising from the amortization of timing differences relating to acquired intangible assets and future income inclusions. The second component, of $3.0 million, relates primarily to deferred credits arising from non capital losses and un-deducted scientific research and development experimental expenditures acquired at a discount on asset acquisitions, which will be included in income as they are utilized. The third component, of $3.9 million, relates to other timing differences. We record a valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets when we believe it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Based on the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, the character of the income tax asset and tax planning strategies, we have determined that a valuation allowance of

$168.8 million is recorded in respect of our deferred income tax assets as at March 31, 2007. (A valuation allowance of $127.5 million was required for the deferred income tax assets as at June 30, 2006). This valuation allowance is primarily attributable to valuation allowances set up based on losses incurred in the year in certain foreign jurisdictions. In order to fully utilize the recognized deferred income tax assets of $78.7 million, we will need to generate aggregate future taxable income in applicable jurisdictions of approximately $191.9 million. Based on our current projection of taxable income, for the periods in the jurisdictions in which the deferred income tax assets are deductible, we believe that it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of the recognized deferred income tax assets as of March 31, 2007.

The following table summarizes the changes in our cash and cash equivalents and cash flows over the periods indicated:


	Three months ended September 30,								Three months ended March 31,									Nine months ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2006			2005			$ Change		2007			2006			$ Change			2007			2006			$ Change
Net cash provided by (used in):
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities	$	9,637		$	278		$	9,359	$	41,342		$	28,699		$	12,643		$	82,407		$	45,371		$	37,036
Investing activities	$	(6,395	)	$	(13,356	)	$	6,961	$	(13,073	)	$	(4,902	)	$	(8,171	)	$	(424,477	)	$	(28,440	)	$	(396,037	)
Financing activities	$	563		$	289		$	274	$	5,675		$	1,665		$	4,010		$	390,274		$	17,122		$	373,152

~~Net~~The increase in operating cash ~~provided by operating activities increased by $9.4~~flow of $12.6 million induring the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, was primarily ~~as a result of an increase in net income of approximately $20.2 million,~~due to an increase in the impact of ~~non-cash charges of $5.7 million offset by~~ changes in operating assets and liabilities of ~~$16.5~~$20.3 million offset by a reduction of non-cash charges of $4.2 million and a reduction of $3.5 million in net income for the period.

The increase in operating cash flow of $37.0 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily due to an increase in net income of $16.3 million, the impact of non-cash charges of $2.2 million and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $18.5 million.

~~Net~~The increase in net cash used in investing activities ~~decreased by approximately $7.0~~of $8.2 million during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year. The overall decrease~~year, was primarily due to ~~a reduction~~$4.1 million in ~~capital expenditures of $3.2 million,~~cash, paid for Momentum and ~~reduced spending on prior period acquisitions (including IXOS) of $6.1 million. The decrease was offset by~~ an increase in acquisition related costs of ~~$2.3~~$6.3 million ~~which includes a payment~~offset by reduction in capital expenditures of ~~$829,000 for~~approximately $2.0 million.

The increase in net cash used in investing activities of $396.0 million during the ~~open market purchase of Hummingbird shares in June 2006.~~

~~Net cash provided by financing increased marginally by $274,000 in the three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year. This increase~~year, was primarily due to ~~increased~~$384.8 million in cash, paid for Hummingbird, $4.1 million in cash, paid for Momentum, and an increase in acquisition related costs of $24.7 million, offset by a reduction in capital expenditures of approximately $12.2 million and lower cash outlays on prior period acquisitions of $6.1 million.

The increase in net cash provided by financing activities of $4.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared, to the same period in the prior fiscal year, was mainly due to a $4.8 million increase in the proceeds onreceived from the issuance of our ~~common shares,~~Common Shares, offset by ~~payments~~a $1.0 million repayment on our long-term debt.

The increase in net cash provided by financing activities of $373.2 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year was mainly due to a $377.1 million increase in our bank financing and a $5.4 million increase in the proceeds we ~~made~~received from the issuance of our Common shares. These increases were offset by debt issuance costs in the amount of $7.4 million and debt repayments of $2.2 million.

On October 2, 2006, we entered into a $465.0 million credit agreement with a Canadian chartered bank consisting of a $390.0 million term loan facility and a $75.0 million committed revolving long-term credit facility (the “revolver”). The term loan was used to partially finance the Hummingbird acquisition and the revolver will be used for general business purposes. The credit agreement is guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries.

The term loan has a seven year term expiring on October 2, 2013, and bears interest at a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%. The term loan principal repayments are equal to 0.25% ($975,000) of the original principal amount, due each quarter with the remainder due at the end of the term.

On May 2, 2007, we announced that we would be making an additional payment of $30.0 million against the term loan in May 2007. This pre-payment is within the terms of our lending agreement. See Note 19 “Subsequent Events” to the Interim Financial Statements.

In October 2006, we also entered into an interest-rate collar agreement that has the economic effect of circumscribing the floating portion of the interest rate obligations associated with $195.0 million of the term loan, within an upper limit of 5.34% and a lower limit of 4.79%.

The revolver has a five year term and expires on October 2, 2011. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at rates specified in the credit agreement. The revolver replaced a CAD $40.0 million line of credit that we previously had with the same bank. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver as of March 31, 2007.

The credit agreement covering the term loan, the revolver and the term loan agreement relating to a mortgage on our ~~mortgage financing.~~Waterloo building also contain covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios. As of March 31, 2007 we were in compliance with all such covenants.

We believe funds generated from the expected results of operations, and available cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to finance our strategic initiatives for the next fiscal year. In addition, our revolving credit facility is available for additional working capital needs or investment opportunities. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to generate cash flows, at or above, current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility.

On May 2, 2007, we filed a notice of intention with the Ontario Securities Commission to make a normal course issuer bid to repurchase up to a maximum of 2,494,053 Common Shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) (“Repurchase Program”). Repurchases, if any are made, will be determined by our Board of Directors and will begin on or after May 7, 2007, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the

NASDAQ. This Repurchase Program will terminate on the earlier of May 6, 2008, or the date on which a total of 2,494,053 Common Shares have been repurchased pursuant to its terms. For details, see Note 19 “Subsequent Events” to the Interim Financial Statements.

We have entered into the following contractual obligations with minimum annual payments for the indicated fiscal periods as follows:


	Payments due by period										Payments due by period
	Total		2007		2008 to 2009		2010 to 2011		2012 and beyond		Total		2007		2008 to 2009		2010 to 2011		2012 and beyond
Long-term debt obligations	$	15,977	$	813	$	2,168	$	12,996	$	—	$	595,672	$	8,853	$	70,433	$	79,688	$	436,698
Operating lease obligations *		86,794		13,745		34,268		27,012		11,769		99,059		6,588		46,200		32,644		13,627
Purchase obligations		4,235		1,836		1,921		478		—		5,924		1,047		3,962		915		—

	$	107,006	$	16,394	$	38,357	$	40,486	$	11,769	$	700,655	$	16,488	$	120,595	$	113,247	$	450,325

We recorded rental expense of ~~$2.3~~$3.9 million and ~~$3.6~~$10.0 million during the three and nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007, respectively.

Rental expense of $1.8 million and $9.1 million was recorded during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, ~~and September 30, 2005,~~ respectively.

The long-term debt obligations are comprised of interest and principal payments on our $390.0 million term loan agreement and a 5 year mortgage on our headquarters in Waterloo, Ontario. ~~For details relating to this mortgage see Note 8 “Long-term debt and credit facilities” in our Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

We have guaranteed a payment by IXOS to the minority shareholders of IXOS of an annual compensation of Euro 0.42 per share (“Annual Compensation”).

The IXOS domination agreement was registered on August 23, 2005. In the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we commenced accruing the amount payable to minority shareholders of IXOS on account of Annual Compensation. This amount has been accounted for as a “guaranteed dividend”, payable to the minority shareholders, and is recorded as a charge to minority interest in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.

Based on the number of minority IXOS shareholders as of ~~September 30, 2006,~~March 31, 2007, the estimated amount of Annual Compensation ~~payable to IXOS minority shareholder~~ was approximately ~~$130,000~~$124,000 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 31, 2007 and $377,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2007. Additionally, an amount of approximately $397,000 was paid, against previously accrued amounts, to the IXOS minority shareholders on account of Annual Compensation for the year ended June 30, 2006. Because we are unable to predict, with reasonable accuracy, the number of IXOS minority shareholders ~~that will be on record~~ in future periods, we are unable to predict the amount of Annual Compensation that will be payable in future years.

The costs associated with the above mentioned procedure are direct incremental costs associated with the ongoing step acquisitions of shares held by the minority shareholders. These disputes are a normal and probable part of the process of acquiring minority shares in Germany. We are unable to predict the future costs associated with these activities that will be payable in future periods.

~~For further details relating to the IXOS domination agreement refer to Note 15 “Commitments and Contingencies” in our Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~The Gauss Squeeze court administered process was successfully concluded in October 2006 and registered with the local court in Hamburg.~~

~~We have recorded our best estimate of the amount payable to the minority shareholders of Gauss under the Squeeze Out. As of September 30, 2006, we had accrued $82,500 for such payments.~~

~~For further details relating to the Gauss Squeeze Out refer to Note 15 “Commitments and Contingencies” in our Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~We are subject from~~From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with

certainty, our management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations orand cash flows.

We do not enter into off-balance sheet financing as a matter of practice except for the use of operating leases for office space, computer equipment, and vehicles. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, neither the lease liability nor the underlying asset is carried on the balance sheet, as the terms of the leases do not meet the criteria for capitalization.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” “SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Most of the provisions in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the amendment to FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS 159 is effective for us beginning July 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the United States Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108,~~Considering~~ “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Current Year ~~Misstatements,~~(“Misstatements”, (“SAB 108”).SAB 108 requires analysis of misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain) approach in assessing materiality and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment. SAB 108 is effective for our fiscal year 2007 annual financial statements. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SAB 108 will have on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurements,, (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. This statement is effective for us beginning July 1, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on our financial statements.

information available at the reporting date, even though the outcome of the tax position is not absolute or final. Subsequent recognition, derecognition, and measurement should be based on new information. A liability for interest or penalties or both will be recognized as deemed to be incurred based on the provisions of the tax law,

that is, the period for which the taxing authority will begin assessing the interest or penalties or both. The amount of interest expense recognized will be based on the difference between the amount recognized in the financial statements and the benefit recognized in the tax return. On transition, the change in net assets due to applying the provisions of the final interpretation will be considered as a change in accounting principle with the cumulative effect of the change treated as an offsetting adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of transition. FIN 48 will be effective for us as of ~~the beginning of the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2006 and will be adopted by us for the year ended June 30, 2008.~~July 1, 2007. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on our financial statements.

For a discussion of the critical accounting policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements, please refer to our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006.

We are primarily exposed to market risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Our exposure to interest rate fluctuations relates primarily to our term loan, as we had no borrowings outstanding under our line of credit at March 31, 2007. The term loan bears a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.5%. As of March 31, 2007, an adverse change in LIBOR of 100 basis points (1.0%) would have the effect of increasing our annual interest payment on the term loan by approximately $3.9 million assuming the loan balance as of March 31, 2007 is outstanding for the entire period.

We manage our interest rate exposure, relating to 50% of the above mentioned term loan, with an interest rate collar that partially hedges the fluctuation in LIBOR. The collar has a notional value of $195.0 million, a cap rate of 5.34% and a floor rate of 4.79%. This has the effect of circumscribing our maximum floating interest rate risk within the range of 5.34% to 4.79%. The collar expires in December 2009.

Businesses generally conduct transactions in their local currency which is also known as their functional currency. Additionally, balances that are denominated in a currency other than the entity’s reporting currency must be adjusted to reflect changes in foreign exchange rates during the reporting period.

~~As we operate internationally, a~~A substantial portion of our ~~business is also conducted~~cash and cash equivalents are held in currencies other than the U.S. ~~dollar. Accordingly,~~dollar, on account of our ~~results are affected,~~global operations. As of March 31, 2007, this balance represented approximately 71% of our total cash and may be affected in the future, by exchange rate fluctuations of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar, to various European currencies, and, to a lesser extent, other foreign currencies. Revenues and expenses generated in foreign currencies are translated at exchange rates during the month in which the transaction occurs. We cannot predict the effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations in the future; however, if significant foreign exchange losses are experienced, they could have a materialcash equivalents. A 10% adverse ~~effect on our results of operations. Moreover, in any given quarter, exchange rates can impact revenue adversely.~~

We have net monetary asset and liability balances in foreign currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, including primarily the Euro (“EUR”), the Pound Sterling (“GBP”), the Canadian Dollar (“CDN”), and the Swiss Franc (“CHF”). Currently, we do not use financial instruments to hedge operating expenses in foreign currencies.

~~The following tables provide a sensitivity analysis on our exposure to changes~~change in foreign exchange ~~rates. For foreign currencies where we engage in material transactions, the following table quantifies the absolute impact that a 10% increase/decrease against~~rates versus the U.S. dollar would have ~~had on~~decreased our ~~total~~reported cash and cash equivalents by approximately 7%.

Our global operations expose us to foreign currency fluctuations. Revenues and related expenses generated from our international subsidiaries are generally denominated in the functional currencies of the local countries. Our primary currencies include Euros, Canadian Dollars, Swiss Francs and British Pounds. The unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income of our global operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the foreign currency conversion of these foreign currency denominated transactions into U.S. dollars results in reduced revenues, operating expenses and net income for our international operations. Similarly, our revenues, operating expenses and net income will increase for our international operations, if the ~~three months ended September 30, 2006. This analysis~~U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies. We cannot predict the effect foreign exchange fluctuations will have on our results going forward. However, if there is ~~presented in both functional and transactional currency. Functional currency represents the currency of measurement for each of~~ an ~~entity’s domestic and foreign operations. Transactional currency represents the currency in which the underlying transactions take place. The impact of changes~~adverse change in foreign exchange rates ~~for those foreign currencies not presented in these tables is not material.~~versus the U.S. dollar, it could have a material effect on our results of operations.

10% Change in
Functional Currency
(in thousands)

Total
Revenue

Operating
Expenses

Net
Income
Euro
   $ 4,059    $ 3,608    $ 451
British Pound
   1,252    719    533
Canadian Dollar
   675    1,855    1,180
Swiss Franc
   927    521    406

10% Change in
Transactional Currency
(in thousands)

Total
Revenue

Operating
Expenses

Net
Income
Euro
   $ 2,641    $ 2,244    $ 397
British Pound
   1,081    745    336
Canadian Dollar
   673    1,851    1,178
Swiss Franc
   584    346    238

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 (e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on the evaluation completed by our management, in which our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer participated, our management has concluded that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended ~~September 30, 2006~~March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our acquisition of Hummingbird may adversely affect our operations and finances in the short term

On October 2, 2006 we acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of ~~Hummingbird Ltd.(“Hummingbird”) for a price of $27.85 per share, which equaled a total purchase price of approximately $494.0 million.~~Hummingbird. The Hummingbird shares were acquired for cash, which required us to borrow the necessary funds from a syndicate of leading financial institutions to help to pay for the Hummingbird acquisition. The interest costs associated with this credit facility will materially increase our operating expenses, which may materially and adversely affect our profitability ~~and~~as well as the price of our Common Shares. The Hummingbird acquisition represents a significant and unique opportunity for our business. However, the size of the acquisition and the inevitable integration challenges that will result from the acquisition may divert management’s attention from the normal daily operations of our existing businesses, products and services. We cannot ensure that we will be successful in retaining key Hummingbird ~~employees and~~employees. In addition, our operations may be disrupted if we fail to adequately retain and motivate all of the employees of the newly merged entity.

We rely on close cooperation with partners for sales and product development as well as ~~to optimize~~for the optimization of opportunities which arise in our competitive environment. If any of our partners should decide for any reason to terminate or scale back their cooperative efforts with us, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we do not continue to develop new technologically advanced products, future revenues will be negatively affected

Our success depends upon our ability to design, develop, test, market, license and support new software products and enhancements of current products on a timely basis in response to both competitive ~~products~~threats and ~~evolving demands of the marketplace.~~marketplace demands. In addition, new software products and enhancements must remain compatible with standard platforms and file formats. We continue to enhance the capability of our Livelink software to enable users to form workgroups and collaborate on private intranets as well as on the Internet. Often, we must integrate software licensed or acquired from third parties with our ~~own~~proprietary software to create or improve our products. These products are important to the success of our ~~strategy, and if~~strategy. If we are unable to achieve a successful integration with third party software, we may not be successful in developing and marketing our new software products and enhancements. If we are unable to successfully integrate the technologies ~~licensed or acquired from third parties,~~ to develop new software products and enhancements to existing products, or to complete products currently under development, which we license or acquire from third parties our operating results will materially suffer. In addition, if the

integrated or new products or enhancements do not achieve ~~market~~ acceptance by the marketplace, our operating results will materially suffer. Also, if new industry standards emerge that we do not anticipate or adapt to, our software products could be rendered obsolete and, as a result, our business, as well as our ability to compete in the marketplace, would be materially harmed.

If our products and services do not gain market acceptance, we may not be able to increase our revenues

We intend to pursue our strategy of growing the capabilities of our ECM software offerings through our proprietary research and development of new product offerings. In response to customer requests, we continue to enhance Livelink and many of our optional components and we continue to set the standard for ECM capabilities. The primary market for our software and services is rapidly ~~evolving. Since we operate in a rapidly~~ evolving ~~industry,~~which means that the level of acceptance of products and services that have been released recently or that are planned for future release by the marketplace is not certain. If the markets for our products and services fail to develop, develop more slowly than expected or become subject to intense competition, our business will suffer. As a result, we may be unable to: (i) successfully market our current products and services, (ii) develop new software products, services and enhancements to current products and services, (iii) complete customer installations on a timely basis, or (iv) complete products and services currently under development. If our products and services are not accepted by our customers or by other businesses in the marketplace, our business and operating results will be materially affected.

Current and future competitors could have a significant impact on our ability to generate future revenue and profits

The markets for our products are intensely competitive, and are subject to rapid technological change and other pressures created by changes in our industry. We expect competition to increase and intensify in the future as the pace of technological change and adaptation quickens and as additional companies enter into each of our markets. Numerous releases of competitive products have occurred in recent history and can be expected to continue in the near future. We may not be able to compete effectively with current competitors and potential entrants into our marketplace. If other businesses were to engage in aggressive pricing policies with respect to competing products, or if the dynamics in our marketplace ~~dictated~~resulted in increasing bargaining power by the ~~development~~consumers of ~~significant price competition,~~our products and services, we would need to lower our prices. This could result in lower revenues or reduced margins, either of which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

We are confronting two inexorable trends in our industry; the consolidation of our competitors and the commoditization of our products and services

The acquisition of Documentum Inc. by EMC Corporation ~~(“EMC”)~~ in December 2003 and International Business ~~Machine (“IBM”)~~Machines Corporation’s acquisition of FileNet Corporation in October 2006 have changed the marketplace for our goods and services. As a result of these acquisitions, two comparable competitors to our company have been replaced by larger and better capitalized companies. In addition, other large corporations with considerable financial resources either have products that compete with the products we offer, or have the ability to encroach on our competitive position within our marketplace. These large, well-capitalized companies have the financial resources to engage in competition with our products and services on the basis of marketing, services or support. They also have the ability to introduce items that compete with our maturing products and services. For example, Microsoft has launched SharePoint, a product which provides the same benefits that some of our ECM products provide at a lower cost to the customer. The threat posed by larger competitors and the goods and services that these companies can produce at a lower cost to our target customers may materially increase our expenses and reduce our revenues. Any material adverse effect on our revenue or cost structure may materially reduce the price of our ~~common shares.~~Common Shares.

Acquisitions, investments, joint ventures and other business initiatives may negatively affect our operating results

We continue to seek out opportunities to acquire or invest in businesses, products and technologies that expand, complement or ~~are~~ otherwise ~~related~~relate to our current business. We also consider from time to time, opportunities to engage in joint ventures or other business collaborations with third parties to address particular market segments. These activities create risks such as the need to integrate and manage the businesses and products acquired with our own business and products, additional demands on our management, resources, systems, procedures and controls, disruption of our ongoing business, and diversion of management’s attention

from other business concerns. Moreover, these transactions could involve substantial investment of funds and/or technology transfers and the acquisition or disposition of product lines or businesses. Also, such activities could result in one-time charges and expenses and have the potential to either dilute the interests of existing shareholders or result in the assumption of debt. Such acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or other business collaborations may involve significant commitments of financial and other resources of our company. Any such activity may not be successful in generating revenue, income or other returns to us, and the financial or other resources committed to such activities will not be available to us for other purposes. For example, the Hummingbird Connectivity family of products maintains a dominant position in its marketplace. As a result, future growth opportunities could be limited for this family of products. Our inability to address ~~these~~limited growth opportunities for this family of products, as well our inability to address other risks ~~could~~associated with other acquisitions or investments in businesses, may negatively affect our operating results.

Businesses we acquire may have disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting that are weaker than or otherwise not in conformity with ours

We have a history of acquiring complementary businesses with varying levels of organizational size and complexity. Upon consummating an acquisition, we seek to implement our disclosure controls and procedures as well as our internal controls over financial reporting at the acquired company as promptly as possible. Depending upon the size and complexity of the business acquired, the implementation of our disclosure controls and procedures as well as the implementation of our internal controls over financial reporting at an acquired company may be a lengthy process. Typically, we conduct due diligence prior to consummating an acquisition, however, our integration efforts may periodically expose deficiencies in the disclosure controls and procedures as well as in internal controls over financial reporting of an acquired company. We expect that the process involved in completing the integration of our own disclosure controls and procedures as well as our own internal controls over financial reporting at an acquired business will sufficiently correct any identified deficiencies. However, if such deficiencies exist, we may not be in a position to comply with our periodic reporting requirements and, as a result, our business and financial condition may be materially harmed.

The length of our sales cycle can fluctuate significantly which could result in significant fluctuations in license revenue being recognized from quarter to quarter

The decision by a customer to purchase our products often involves a comprehensive implementation process across our customer’s network or networks. As a result, licenses of these products may entail a significant commitment of resources by prospective customers, accompanied by the attendant risks and delays frequently associated with significant expenditures and lengthy sales cycle and implementation procedures. Given the significant investment and commitment of resources required by an organization to implement our software, our sales cycle ~~can tend to~~may be longer ~~than generally expected.~~compared to companies in other industries. Over the past fiscal year, we have experienced a lengthening of our sales cycle as customers include more personnel in their decisions and focus on more enterprise-wide licensing deals. In an economic environment of reduced information technology spending, it ~~can~~may take several months, or even several quarters, for ~~selling~~marketing opportunities to materialize. If a customer’s decision to license our software is delayed or if the installation of our products takes longer than originally anticipated, the date on which we may recognize revenue from these licenses would be delayed. Such delays could cause our revenues to be lower than expected in a particular period.

Our international operations expose us to business risks that could cause our operating results to suffer

We intend to continue to make efforts to increase our international operations and anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenue. We have increased our presence in the European market, especially since our acquisition of IXOS Software AG (“IXOS”). These international operations are subject to certain risks and costs, including the difficulty and expense of administering business and compliance abroad, compliance with both domestic and foreign laws, compliance with domestic and international import and export laws and regulations, costs related to localizing products for foreign markets, and costs related

to translating and distributing products in a timely manner. International operations also tend to be subject to a longer sales and collection cycle. In addition, regulatory limitations regarding the repatriation of earnings may adversely affect cash drawls from foreign operations. Significant international sales may also expose us to greater risk from political and economic instability, unexpected changes in Canadian, United States or other governmental policies concerning import and export of goods and technology, regulatory requirements, tariffs and other trade barriers. In addition, international earnings may be subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction, which could also materially adversely affect our effective tax rate. Also, international expansion may be more difficult, time consuming, and costly. As a result, if revenues from international operations do not offset the expenses of establishing and maintaining foreign operations, our operating results will suffer. Moreover, in any given quarter, foreign exchange rates can impact revenue adversely.

We incur operating expenses based upon anticipated revenue trends. Since a high percentage of these expenses are relatively fixed, a delay in recognizing revenue from ~~license~~ transactions related to these expenses could cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter and, as a result ~~this~~such a delay could materially reduce operating income. If these expenses are not subsequently followed by revenues, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, in July 2005, we announced our 2006 restructuring initiative to restructure our operations with the intention of streamlining our operations. Subsequently, in October 2006 we announced our commitment to a separate restructuring initiative in response to the ~~aftermath of our acquisition of Hummingbird.~~Hummingbird acquisition. We will continue to evaluate our operations, and may propose future restructuring actions as a result of changes in the marketplace, including the exit from less profitable operations or the decision to terminate services which are not valued by our customers. Any failure to successfully execute these initiatives on a timely basis may have a material adverse impact on our operations.

Our products may contain defects that could harm our reputation, be costly to correct, delay revenues, and expose us to litigation

Our products are highly complex and sophisticated and, from time to time, may contain design defects or software errors that are difficult to detect and correct. Errors may be found in new software products or improvements to existing products after commencement of shipments to our customers. If these defects are discovered, we may not be able to successfully correct such errors in a timely manner. In addition, despite the extensive tests we conduct on all our products, we may not be able to fully simulate the environment in which our products will operate and, as a result, we may be unable to adequately detect the design defects or software errors which may become apparent only after the products are installed in an end-user’s network. The occurrence of errors and failures in our products could result in the delay or the denial of market acceptance of our products; alleviating such errors and failures may require us to make significant expenditure of our resources. The harm to our reputation resulting from product errors and failures may be materially damaging. Since, we regularly provide a warranty with our products, the financial impact of fulfilling warranty obligations may be significant in the future. Our agreements with our strategic partners and end-users typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to claims. These agreements usually contain terms such as the exclusion of all implied warranties and the limitation of the availability of consequential or incidental damages. However, such provisions may not effectively protect us against claims and the attendant liabilities and costs associated with

such claims. Although we maintain errors and omissions insurance coverage and comprehensive liability insurance coverage, such coverage may not be adequate to cover all such claims. Accordingly, any such claim could negatively affect our financial condition.

Failure to protect our intellectual property could harm our ability to compete effectively

We are highly dependent on our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as non-disclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to establish and maintain our proprietary rights. Although we hold certain patents and have other

patents pending, our general strategy is to not seek patent protection. Although we intend to protect our rights vigorously, there can be no assurance that these measures will, in all cases, be successful. Enforcement of our intellectual property rights may be difficult, particularly in some nations outside of North America in which we seek to market our products. While U.S. and Canadian copyright laws, international conventions and international treaties may provide meaningful protection against unauthorized duplication of software, the laws of some foreign jurisdictions may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of Canada or of the United States. Software piracy has been, and is expected to be, a persistent problem for the software industry. Certain of our license arrangements have required us to make a limited confidential disclosure of portions of the source code for our products, or to place such source code into an escrow for the protection of another party. Despite the precautions we have taken, unauthorized third parties, including our competitors, may be able to copy certain portions of our products or to reverse engineer or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Also, our competitors could independently develop technologies that are perceived to be substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies. Our competitive position may be affected by our ability to protect our intellectual property.

Other companies may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, which could materially increase costs and materially harm our ability to generate future revenue and profits

Claims of infringement are becoming increasingly common as the software industry develops and as related legal protections, including patents, are applied to software products. Although we do not believe that our products infringe on the rights of third-parties, third-parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future. Although most of our technology is proprietary in nature, we do include certain third party software in our products. In these cases, this software is licensed from the entity holding our intellectual property rights. Although we believe that we have secured proper licenses for all third-party software that ~~has been~~is integrated into our products, third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future, and any such assertion may result in litigation or may require us to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of third-parties. Such licenses may not be available, or they may not be available on reasonable terms. In addition, such litigation could be disruptive to our ability to generate revenue and may result in significantly increased costs as a result of our defense against those claims or our attempt to license the patents or rework our products to ensure they comply with judicial decisions. Any of the foregoing could have a significant impact on our ability to generate future revenue and profits.

The loss of licenses to use third party software or the lack of support or enhancement of such software could adversely affect our business

We currently depend on certain third-party software. If such software was not available, we may experience delays or increased costs in the development of licenses for our products. For a limited number of product modules, we rely on certain software that we license from third-parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and which is used in our products to perform key functions. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, and the related software may not continue to be appropriately supported, maintained, or enhanced by the licensors. The loss by us of the license to use, or the inability by licensors to support, maintain, and enhance any of such software, could result in increased costs or in delays or reductions in product shipments until equivalent software is developed or licensed and integrated with internally developed software. Such increased costs or delays or reductions in product shipments could adversely affect our business.

A reduction in the number or sales efforts by distributors could materially impact our revenues

A significant portion of our revenue is derived from the license of our products through third parties. Our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to maintain access to existing channels of distribution and to gain access to new channels if and when they develop. We may not be able to retain a sufficient number of our existing distributors or develop a sufficient number of future distributors. Distributors may also give higher priority to the sale of products other than ours (which could include competitors’ products) or may not devote

sufficient resources to marketing our products. The performance of third party distributors is largely outside of our control and we are unable to predict the extent to which these distributors will be successful in marketing and licensing our products. A reduction in sales efforts, a decline in the number of distributors, or our distributors’ decision to discontinue the sale of our products could materially reduce revenue.

We must continue to manage our growth or our operating results could be adversely affected

Our markets have continued to evolve at a rapid pace. Moreover, we have grown significantly through acquisitions in the past and continue to review acquisition opportunities as a means of increasing the size and scope of our business. Finally, we have been subject to increased regulation, including various NASDAQ rules and Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes”), which has necessitated a significant use of our resources to comply with the increased level of regulation on a timely basis. Our growth, coupled with the rapid evolution of our markets and ~~heightened~~more stringent regulations, have placed, and will continue to place, significant strains on our administrative and operational resources and increased demands on our internal systems, procedures and controls. Our administrative infrastructure, systems, procedures and controls may not adequately support our operations or compliance with such regulations. In addition, our management may not be able to achieve the rapid, effective execution of the product and business initiatives necessary to successfully implement our operational and competitive strategy and to comply with all regulatory rules. If we are unable to manage growth effectively, or comply with such new regulations, our operating results will likely suffer. Our inability to manage growth or adapt to regulatory changes may also adversely affect our compliance with our periodic reporting requirements or listing standards, which could result in our delisting from the NASDAQ stock ~~market.~~market or in our failure to comply with the rules or the regulations of the SEC.

Recently enacted and proposed changes in securities laws and related regulations could result in increased costs to us

Recently enacted and proposed changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of Sarbanes and recent rules proposed and enacted by the SEC and NASDAQ, have ~~resulted in~~materially increased ~~costs to us~~our expenses as we respond to the these changes. In particular, ~~complying~~compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes has resulted in a higher level of internal costs and fees from our independent accounting firm and as well as from external consultants. These rules could also adversely affect our ability to obtain certain types of insurance at a reasonable cost, including director and officer liability insurance. As a result, we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage and/or incur substantially higher premiums and related costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The ~~impact of these events~~increased difficulty to obtain affordable director and officer liability insurance could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, on committees of our Board of Directors, or as executive officers.

If we are not able to attract and retain top employees, our ability to compete may be harmed

Our performance is substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers and key employees. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could significantly harm our business. We do not maintain “key person” life insurance policies on any of our employees. Our success is also highly dependent on our continuing ability to identify, hire, train, retain and motivate highly qualified management, technical, sales and marketing personnel. In particular, the recruitment of top research developers and experienced salespeople remains critical to our success. Competition for such people is intense, and we may not be able to attract, integrate or retain highly qualified technical, sales or managerial personnel in the future.

Our products rely on the stability of infrastructure software that, if not stable, could negatively impact the effectiveness of our products, resulting in harm to our reputation and business

Our developments of Internet and intranet applications depend and will depend on the stability, functionality and scalability of the infrastructure software of the underlying intranet, such as ~~that of~~the infrastructure software

produced by Sun Microsystems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Oracle Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and others. If weaknesses in such infrastructure software exist, we may not be able to correct or compensate for such weaknesses. If we are unable to address weaknesses resulting from problems in the infrastructure software such that our products do not meet customer needs or expectations, our ~~business~~reputation, and ~~reputation~~consequently, our business may be significantly harmed.

Our quarterly revenues and operating results are likely to fluctuate which could materially impact the price of our Common Shares

We experience, and we are likely to continue to experience, significant fluctuations in quarterly revenues and operating results caused by many factors, including:

A cancellation or deferral of even a small number of licenses or delays in the installation of our products could have a material adverse effect on our operations in any particular quarter. ~~Because of the impact~~As a result of the timing of product introductions and the rapid evolution of our business as well as of the markets we serve, we cannot predict whether seasonal patterns experienced in the past will continue. For these reasons, ~~reliance~~you should not ~~be placed~~rely upon period-to-period comparisons of our financial results to forecast future performance. ~~It is likely that our~~Our quarterly revenue and operating results may vary significantly and which could materially reduce the market price of our Common Shares.

The market price of our Common Shares has been subject to wide fluctuations. Such fluctuations in market price may continue in response to quarterly variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products that are relevant to our industry, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or other events or factors. In addition, financial markets experience significant price and volume fluctuations that

particularly affect the market prices of equity securities of many technology companies. These fluctuations have often resulted from the failure of such companies to meet market expectations in a particular quarter and thus may or may not be related to the underlying operating performance of such companies. Broad market fluctuations or any failure of our operating results in a particular quarter to meet market expectations may

adversely affect the market price of our Common Shares. ~~Sometimes,~~Occasionally, periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, may lead to the institution of securities class action litigation against a company. Due to the volatility of our stock price, we could be the target of such securities litigation in the future. Such litigation could result in substantial costs to defend our interests and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We are subject to income taxes as well as other taxes in a variety of jurisdictions and our tax structure is subject to review by both domestic and foreign taxation authorities. The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant judgment. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the ultimate outcome with respect to the taxes we owe may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements which may materially affect our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

On October 2, 2006, the Company established the Open Text Corporation Hummingbird Stock Option Plan to provide for the grant of Open Text stock options to Hummingbird employees. A copy of this stock option plan is attached as an exhibit to this quarterly report under Form 10-Q.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		Page No
PART I Financial Information:

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2006 (Unaudited)~~March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006	3

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Income (Unaudited) –~~ Income—Three and Nine Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007 and 2006 ~~and 2005~~	4

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Deficit (Unaudited) –~~ Deficit—Three and Nine Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007 and 2006 ~~and 2005~~	5

	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash ~~Flows (Unaudited) –~~ Flows—Three and Nine Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2007 and 2006 ~~and 2005~~	6

	Unaudited Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements ~~(Unaudited)~~	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2733

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4048

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4149

PART II Other Information:

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4250

~~Item 5.~~	~~Other Information~~	49

Item 6.	Exhibits	4958

Signatures		5059

Index to Exhibits		5160


	Three months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005
Other comprehensive net income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	$	(1,837	)	$	2,163
Unrealized gain on investments in marketable securities		206			—
Net income (loss) for the period		7,301			(12,868	)

Comprehensive net income (loss) for the period	$	5,670		$	(10,705	)


	Technology Assets			Customer Assets			Total
Net book value, June 30, 2005	$	76,108		$	51,873		$	127,981
Activity during fiscal 2006:
Amortization expense		(18,900	)		(9,199	)		(28,099	)
Impairment of intangible assets		(1,046	)		—			(1,046	)
Foreign exchange impact		3,000			2,598			5,598
Other		(3,988	)		1,880			(2,108	)

Net book value, June 30, 2006		55,174			47,152			102,326
Activity during fiscal 2007:
Acquisition of Hummingbird		159,200			139,800			299,000
Amortization expense		(25,675	)		(17,147	)		(42,822	)
Foreign exchange impact		1,702			1,536			3,238
Other		271			102			373

Net book value, March 31, 2007	$	190,672		$	171,443		$	362,115


	Fiscal years ending June 30,
2007	$	17,822
2008		71,014
2009		64,377
2010		51,836
2011		49,276

Total	$	254,325


	Technology Assets			Customer Assets			Total
Net book value, June 30, 2005	$	76,108		$	51,873		$	127,981
Activity during fiscal 2006:
Amortization expense		(18,900	)		(9,199	)		(28,099	)
Impairment of intangible assets		(1,046	)		—			(1,046	)
Foreign exchange impact		3,000			2,598			5,598
Other		(3,988	)		1,880			(2,108	)

Net book value, June 30, 2006		55,174			47,152			102,326
Activity during fiscal 2007:
Amortization expense		(4,846	)		(2,382	)		(7,228	)
Foreign exchange impact		(219	)		(140	)		(359	)
Other		10			4			14

Net book value, September 30, 2006	$	50,119		$	44,634		$	94,753


	Fiscal years ending June 30,
2007	$	20,732
2008		27,239
2009		20,863
2010		8,718
2011		6,215

Total	$	83,767


	As of September 30, 2006		As of June 30, 2006
Accounts payable—trade	$	4,269	$	6,077
Accrued salaries and commissions		13,467		15,020
Accrued liabilities		26,821		26,827
Amounts payable in respect of restructuring (note 16)		4,054		6,148
Amounts payable in respect of acquisitions and acquisition related accruals		7,741		8,463

	$	56,352	$	62,535


Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2006	$	2,736
Bad debt expense for the period		720
Write-off/adjustments		(726	)

Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2006	$	2,730


	Consolidated			Hummingbird (as of date of acquisition)			Net of Hummingbird
Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts (“AfDA”) as of June 30, 2006	$	2,736		$	—		$	2,736
Bad debt expense for the period		1,506			—			1,506
AfDA relating to Hummingbird accounts receivable at date of acquisition		17,592			17,592			—
Write-offs		(12,483	)		(10,200	)		(2,283	)

Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts as of March 31, 2007	$	9,351		$	7,392		$	1,959


	Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($’000s)
Outstanding at June 30, 2006	5,334,016		$	12.25
Granted	450,000			17.01
Exercised	(70,572	)		4.24
Forfeited or expired	(50,493	)		15.78

Outstanding at September 30, 2006	5,662,951		$	12.70	4.67	$	29,447

Exercisable at September 30, 2006	3,836,709		$	10.93	3.80	$	26,742


	As of September 30, 2006		As of June 30, 2006
Segment assets	$	641,886	$	637,920
Investments in marketable securities		21,127		21,025
Cash and cash equivalents (corporate)		2,379		12,148

Total assets	$	665,392	$	671,093


	Work force reduction			Facility costs			Other			Total
Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan
Balance as of June 30, 2006	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Accruals		5,679			213			203			6,095
Cash payments		(3,700	)		(35	)		(203	)		(3,938	)
Foreign exchange and other adjustments		(21	)		(15	)		—			(36	)

Balance as of March 31, 2007	$	1,958		$	163		$	—		$	2,121


Current assets (net of cash acquired of $620,000)	$	1,454
Long-term assets		157
Goodwill *		3,251

Total assets acquired		4,862
Liabilities assumed		(506	)

Net assets acquired	$	4,356


	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31
(In thousands)	2007			2006			2007			2006
North America	$	75,230		$	45,902		$	196,814		$	145,918
Europe		73,410			49,656			203,794			142,257
Other		7,412			5,368			19,860			16,152

Total	$	156,052		$	100,926		$	420,468		$	304,327


	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
% of Total Revenue	2007			2006			2007			2006
North America		48.2	%		45.5	%		46.8	%		47.9	%
Europe		47.0	%		49.2	%		48.5	%		46.7	%
Other		4.8	%		5.3	%		4.7	%		5.4	%

Total		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%


	10% Change in Functional Currency (in thousands)
	Total Revenue		Operating Expenses		Net Income
Euro	$	4,059	$	3,608	$	451
British Pound		1,252		719		533
Canadian Dollar		675		1,855		1,180
Swiss Franc		927		521		406

	10% Change in Transactional Currency (in thousands)
	Total Revenue		Operating Expenses		Net Income
Euro	$	2,641	$	2,244	$	397
British Pound		1,081		745		336
Canadian Dollar		673		1,851		1,178
Swiss Franc		584		346		238


Exhibit Number ~~Number~~		Description of Exhibit

~~10.1~~		~~Open Text Corporation “Hummingbird Stock Option Plan”.~~

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


	OPEN TEXT CORPORATION

Date: ~~November 9, 2006~~May 7, 2007	By:	/S/s/ JOHN SHACKLETON
		John Shackleton
		President and Chief Executive Officer

		/S/s/ PAUL MCFEETERS
		Paul McFeeters
		Chief Financial Officer