UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007MARCH 31, 2008

OR

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number 033-37576

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (651) 361-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitiondefinitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

¨   Large accelerated filer    ¨  Accelerated filer    x  Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  ¨    No  x

As of AugustMay 1, 2007,2008, there were 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding, all of which are owned by Assurant, Inc.

THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTIONSINSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007MARCH 31, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Union Security Insurance Company

Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

At June 30, 2007 (Unaudited)March 31, 2008 and December 31, 20062007

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Union Security Insurance Company

Consolidated Balance Sheets

At June 30, 2007 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2006

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Union Security Insurance Company

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)(unaudited)

Three and Six Months Ended June 30,March 31, 2008 and 2007 and 2006

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Union Security Insurance Company

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity

From December 31, 20062007 to June 30, 2007 (Unaudited)March 31, 2008 (unaudited)

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Union Security Insurance Company

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)(unaudited)

SixThree Months Ended June 30,March 31, 2008 and 2007 and 2006

See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statementsstatements.

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)(unaudited)

SixThree Months Ended June 30,March 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share and 2006share amounts)

Union Security Insurance Company (the “Company”) is a provider of life and health insurance products.products including group disability insurance, group dental insurance, group life insurance, small employer group health insurance and pre-funded funeral insurance (“preneed”). The Company is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Assurant, Inc. (the “Parent”). The Parent’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol AIZ.

The Company was redomesticated to Iowa from Minnesota in 2004. The Company distributes its products in all states except New York. The Company’s revenues are derived principally from group employee benefits and group health products. The Company offers group disability insurance, group dental insurance, group life insurance, small employer group health insurance and pre-funded funeral insurance.

Effective December 31, 2006, International Dental Plans, Inc. (“IDP”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Parent, was merged into the operations of the Company. Accordingly, all prior period amounts presented have been restated to conform to the 2007 presentation.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of a normal recurring accruals)nature) considered necessary for a fair statement of the financial statements have been included. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation.

Dollar amounts are in thousands except for number of shares.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

Operating results for Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted2008 presentation.

OnThe Company recorded an after-tax cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $(2,730) on January 1, 2007, the Company adopted AICPA Statement of Position 05-1,Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts,(“SOP 05-1”). SOP 05-1 provides guidance on internal replacements of insurance and investment contracts. An internal replacement is a modification in product benefits, features, rights or coverages that occurs by the exchange of a contract for a new contract or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. Modifications that result in a new contract that is substantially different from the replaced contract are accounted for as an extinguishment of the replaced contract, and the associated unamortized DAC, unearned revenue liabilities and deferred sales inducements from the replaced contract must be reported as an expense immediately. Modifications resulting in a new contract that is substantially the same as the replaced contract are accounted for as a continuation of the replaced contract. Prior2008, related to the adoption of the SOP 05-1, certain internal replacements were accounted for as continuationsStatement of the replaced contract. Therefore, the accounting policy for certain internal replacements has changed as a result of the adoption of this SOP. At adoption, the Company recognized a $4,118 decrease to deferred acquisition costs, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FAS No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140(“FAS 155”). This statement resolves issues addressed in FAS 133 Implementation Issue No. D1,Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets. FAS 155 (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation; (b) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of FAS 133; (c) establishes a requirement to evaluate beneficial interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and (e) eliminates restrictions on a qualifying special-purpose entity’s ability to hold passive derivative financial instruments that pertain to beneficial interests that are or contain a derivative financial instrument. FAS 155 also requires presentation within the financial statements that identifies those hybrid financial instruments for which the fair value election has been applied and information on the income statement impact of the changes in fair value of those instruments. The adoption of FAS 155 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). There was no impact as a result of adoption on the Company’s January 1, 2007 retained earnings. At adoption, total unrecognized tax benefits are $50,251. Of the total unrecognized tax benefits, $44,217, if recognized, would impact the Company’s consolidated effective tax rate. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2002, with the exception of one item from 2001 that was under appeals. The issue under appeals relates to the sale of one of the Company’s businesses. During the second quarter of 2007, the Company agreed to settle this issue with the IRS, which resulted in a decrease to income tax expense of $8,695 and a decrease to tax related interest of $3,262. Substantially all state, local and non-U.S. income tax matters have been concluded for the years through 1999. The Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. At the date of adoption, the Company had $7,381 accrued for tax related interest and penalties on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Outstanding

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”FAS”) issued FAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(“ (“FAS 157”). The amount is reflected in the statement of changes in stockholder’s equity as required. See Notes 3 and 4 for further information regarding the adoption of FAS 157.

As part of our ongoing monitoring process, we regularly review our investment portfolio to ensure that investments that may be other-than-temporarily impaired are identified on a timely basis and that any impairment is charged against earnings in the proper period. We have reviewed these securities and recorded $14,326 of other-than-temporary impairments for the three months ended March 31, 2008. There were no other-than-temporary impairments for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Adopted

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS 157 which defines fair value, addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effectiveapplied prospectively for financial statements issuedassets and liabilities measured on a

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

recurring basis as of January 1, 2008 except for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Therefore,certain financial assets that were measured at fair value using a transaction price. For these financial instruments, which the Company is required to adopthas, FAS 157 inrequires limited retrospective adoption and thus the first quarterdifference between the fair values using a transaction price and the fair values using an exit price of 2008. Thethe relevant financial instruments will be shown as a cumulative-effect adjustment to January 1, 2008 retained earnings. At adoption, the Company is currently evaluatingrecognized a $4,200 decrease to other assets, and a corresponding decrease of $2,730 (after-tax) to retained earnings. See Note 4 for further information regarding the requirementsadoption of FAS 157 and157.

On January 1, 2008, the potential impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issuedCompany adopted FAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(“ (“FAS 159”). FAS 159 provides a choice to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on specified election dates and requires disclosures about the election of the fair value option. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. The Company has chosen not to elect the fair value option for any financial or non-financial instruments as of the adoption date, thus the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FAS No. 141R,Business Combinations(“FAS 141R”). FAS 141R replaces FASB Statement No. 141,Business Combinations(“FAS 141”).FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in FAS 141 that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations, that an acquirer be identified for each business combination and for goodwill to be recognized and measured as a residual. FAS 141R expands the definition of transactions and events that qualify as business combinations to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. FAS 141R broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of business combinations. FAS 141R also increases the disclosure requirements for business combinations in the financial statements. FAS 141R is effective for fiscal yearsperiods beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2007.2008. Therefore, the Company is required to adopt FAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008.141R on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FAS 159141R and the potential impact on the Company’s financial statements.position and results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160,Non-Controlling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51(“FAS 160”). FAS 160 requires that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary be separately reported within equity and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the non-controlling interest be presented in the statement of operations. FAS 160 also calls for consistency in reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary and necessitates fair value measurement of any non-controlling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Therefore, the Company is required to adopt FAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FAS 160 and the potential impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

In February 2008, the FASB issued Financial Statement of Position FAS 157-2 (“FSP FAS 157-2”). FSP FAS 157-2 defers the effective date of FAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FAS 157 for its non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis and the potential impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, creates a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. FAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In accordance with FAS 157, the Company has categorized its recurring basis financial assets and liabilities based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The FASB has deferred the effective date of FAS 157 until January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis in accordance with FSP FAS 157-2.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The levels of the fair value hierarchy and its application to the Company’s financial assets and liabilities are described below:

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

The following table summarizes the change in balance sheet carrying value associated with Level 3 financial assets carried at fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2008:

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

FAS 157 describes three different valuation techniques to be used in determining fair value for financial assets and liabilities: the market, income or cost approaches. The three valuation techniques described within FAS 157 are consistent with generally accepted valuation methodologies. The market approach valuation technique use prices and other relevant information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. When possible, quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets are used as of the period-end date. Otherwise, valuation techniques consistent with the market approach including matrix pricing and comparables are used. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique employed to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for those securities but comparing those securities to benchmark or comparable securities. Comparables use market multiples, which might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable.

Income approach valuation techniques convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount, or a discounted amount. These techniques rely on current market expectations of future amounts as of the period-end date. Examples of income approach valuation techniques include present value techniques, option-pricing models, binomial or lattice models that incorporate present value techniques, and the multi-period excess earnings method.

Cost approach valuation techniques are based upon the amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset at the period-end date, or the current replacement cost. That is, from the perspective of a market participant (seller), the price that would be received for the asset is determined based on the cost to a market participant (buyer) to acquire or construct a substitute asset of comparable utility, adjusted for obsolescence.

While all three approaches are not applicable to all financial assets or liabilities, where appropriate, one or more valuation technique may be used. For all the financial assets and liabilities included in the above hierarchy, excluding derivatives and private placement bonds, the market valuation technique is generally used. For private placement bonds and derivatives, the income valuation technique is generally used. For the period ended March 31, 2008, the application of valuation techniques applied to similar assets and liabilities has been consistent.

Level 2 valuations include observable market inputs. FAS 157 defines observable market inputs as the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. The extent of the use of each observable market input for a security depends on the type of security and the market conditions at the balance sheet date. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of observable market inputs may change as some observable market inputs may not be relevant or additional inputs may be necessary. The following observable market inputs, listed in the approximate order of priority, are utilized in the pricing evaluation of Level 2 securities: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. Each security is evaluated based on relevant market information including: relevant credit information, perceived market movements and sector news. Valuation models can change period to period, depending on the appropriate observable inputs that are available at the balance sheet date to price a security.

The Company performs a monthly analysis to assess if the evaluated prices represent a reasonable estimate of their fair value. This process involves quantitative and qualitative analysis and is overseen by investment and accounting professionals. Examples of procedures performed include, but are not limited to, initial and on-going review of pricing methodologies, review of the evaluated prices, review of pricing statistics and trends, and comparison of prices for certain securities with two different appropriate price sources for reasonableness. As a result of this analysis, if the Company determines there is a more appropriate fair value based upon available market data, the price of a security is adjusted accordingly.

Union Security Insurance Company

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share and share amounts)

The Parent sponsors a defined benefit pension plan and certain other post retirement benefits covering employees and certain agents who meet eligibility requirements as to age and length of service. Pension costs allocated to the Company were $1,880$1,350 and $1,908$1,571 for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively, and $3,450 and $3,816 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The Company participates in a contributory profit sharing plan, sponsored by the Parent, covering employees and certain agents who meet eligibility requirements as to age and length of service. The amounts expensed by the Company were $1,276$2,248 and $1,259$1,920 for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively, and $3,196 and $3,277 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The Company is regularly involved in litigation in the ordinary course of business, both as a defendant and as a plaintiff. The Company may from time to time be subject to a variety of legal and regulatory actions relating to the Company’s current and past business operations. While the Company cannot predict the outcome of any pending or future litigation, examination or investigation and although no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that any pending matter will have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, or results of operations.operations or cash flows.

On April 1, the Company and an affiliate, United Family Life Insurance Company (“UFLIC”) amended the existing Agreement of Reinsurance (“Agreement”) between the two companies. Under the terms of the amendment, UFLIC will cede to the Company 100% of its remaining reinsured liabilities, as defined in the Agreement, on a coinsurance basis. No gain or loss will be recognized as a result of this amendment to the Agreement, and the Company will pay a ceding fee of $8,159 to UFLIC. This ceding fee represents consideration for the business acquired and will be recorded as value of business acquired and amortized over the expected life of the underlying insurance policies.

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(Dollar amounts in thousands except share data.)thousands)

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) addresses the financial condition of Union Security Insurance Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, USIC or the Company) as of June 30, 2007,March 31, 2008, compared with December 31, 2006,2007, and its results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,March 31, 2008, compared with the equivalent 2006 periods.2007 period. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s MD&A and annual audited financial statements as of December 31, 20062007 included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20062007 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (hereafter referred to as the Company’s 20062007 Form 10-K) and unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Some of the statements in this MD&A and elsewhere in this report may contain forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words such as “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon our historical performance and on current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in this report. We believe that these factors include but are not limited to those described under the subsection below entitled “Critical Factors Affecting Results” and in the subsection entitled “Risk Factors” in our 20062007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward-looking statements you read in this report reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, financial condition, growth strategy and liquidity.

Critical Factors Affecting Results

Our results depend on the adequacy of our product pricing, underwriting and the accuracy of our methodology for the establishment of reserves for future policyholder benefits and claims, returns on invested assets and our ability to manage our expenses. Therefore, factors affecting these items may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our 20062007 Form 10-K described the accounting policies and estimates that are critical to the understanding of our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. The accounting policies and estimates described in the 20062007 Form 10-K were consistently applied to the consolidated interim financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.March 31, 2008.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See—Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Adopted

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Standards (“FAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 defines fair value, addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is applied prospectively for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of January 1, 2008 except for certain financial assets that were measured at fair value using a transaction price. For these financial instruments, which the Company has, FAS 157 requires limited retrospective adoption and thus the difference between the fair values using a transaction price and the fair values using an exit price of the relevant financial instruments will be shown as a cumulative-effect adjustment to January 1, 2008 retained earnings. At adoption, the Company recognized a $4,200 decrease to other assets, and a corresponding decrease of $2,730 (after-tax) to retained earnings. See Note 4 for further information regarding the adoption of FAS 157.

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“FAS 159”). FAS 159 provides a choice to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on specified election dates and requires disclosures about the election of the fair value option. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. The Company has chosen not to elect the fair value option for any financial or non-financial instruments as of the adoption date, thus the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FAS No. 141R,Business Combinations(“FAS 141R”). FAS 141R replaces FASB Statement No. 141,Business Combinations(“FAS 141”).FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements in FAS 141 that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations, that an acquirer be identified for each business combination and for goodwill to be recognized and measured as a residual. FAS 141R expands the definition of transactions and events that qualify as business combinations to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. FAS 141R broadens the fair value measurement and recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of business combinations. FAS 141R also increases the disclosure requirements for business combinations in the financial statements. FAS 141R is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Therefore, the Company is required to adopt FAS 141R on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FAS 141R and the potential impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160,Non-controlling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51(“FAS 160”). FAS 160 requires that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary be separately reported within equity and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the non-controlling interest be presented in the statement of operations. FAS 160 also calls for consistency in reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary and necessitates fair value measurement of any non-controlling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Therefore, the Company is required to adopt FAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of FAS 160 and the potential impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In February 2008, the FASB issued Financial Statement Footnote 3.of Position FAS 157-2 (“FSP FAS 157-2”). FSP FAS 157-2 defers the effective date of FAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, which for the Company is January 1, 2009. The Company is currently

evaluating the requirements of FAS 157 for its non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis and the potential impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

The tables below present information regarding our consolidated results of operations:

For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2007March 31, 2008 Compared to The Three Months Ended June 30, 2006.March 31, 2007.

Net Income

Net income increased by $19,369,decreased $33,210, or 71%69%, to $46,829$14,839 for the three months ended June 30, 2007First Quarter 2008 from $27,460$48,049 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. This increase is partly due to an increase in fees and other income of approximately $3,100, after-tax, related to the sale of the marketing rights of the Independent – U.S. distribution channel in our pre-funded funeral business and favorable group disability and group life experience. Also contributing to the increase in net income was a decrease in income taxes of $11,957 due to a reduction in certain tax contingencies associated with a favorable tax settlement. Partially offsetting these increases to net income were declines in our small employer group health and group dental businesses.

Total Revenues

Total revenues decreased by $25,640, or 6%, to $381,391 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $407,031 for the three months ended June 30, 2006.First Quarter 2007. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in net investment income and an increase in net realized losses on investments. The decrease in net investment income is primarily attributable to a decrease in investment income from real estate joint venture partnerships of approximately $19,600, after-tax. The increase in net realized losses on investments is driven by the write-down of other-than-temporary impairments in our investment portfolio of $9,312, after-tax.

Total Revenues

Total revenues decreased $79,839, or 18%, to $359,398 for First Quarter 2008 from $439,237 for First Quarter 2007. This decrease is primarily due to decreases in net investment income and net earned premiums and other considerations, of $27,533, partially offset byand an increase in fees and othernet realized losses on investments. Net investment income declined due to $30,100 of $4,137.real estate joint venture partnership income included in First Quarter 2007, while First Quarter 2008 had no investment income from real estate joint venture partnerships. Net earned premiums and other considerations decreased primarily due to declinesa decrease of $16,635 in premiums related to disability business written through our group disability and group dental businesses as the business continues to implement its small case strategy.Disability Reinsurance Management Services (“DRMS”) channel driven by a decrease in single premiums on closed blocks of business. Also contributing to the decrease in net earned premiums and other considerations wasis a declinereduction of $10,900 in our small employer group health business the loss of a clientdriven by declining sales and lower membership. These decreases to net earned premiums and other considerations were partially offset by an increase in our accidental death and dismemberment (“AD&D”)group dental business and the sale of the Independent–U.S. distribution channeldue to an increase in our pre-funded funeral business. Fees and other incomesales. Net realized losses on investments increased primarily due to the salea $14,326 write-down of the marketing rights of the Independent – U.S. channelother-than-temporary impairments in our pre-funded funeral business.investment portfolio.

Total Benefits, Losses and Expenses

Total benefits, losses and expenses decreased by $35,449,$26,853, or 10%7%, to $328,252$336,750 for the three months ended June 30, 2007First Quarter 2008 from $363,701$363,603 for the three months ended June 30, 2006.First Quarter 2007. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease of $18,749 in policyholder benefits driven by favorable experience in our group disability and group life businesses. Policyholder benefits and selling, underwriting and general expenses also decreased due the sale of our Independent – U.S. distribution channel in our pre-funded funeral business.

Selling, underwriting and general expenses also decreased due to lower commission expense as a result of the loss of a client in our AD&D business, the sale of the Independent-U.S. distribution channel and lower sales and renewals in our small employer group health business.

Income Taxes

Income taxes decreased by $9,560, or 60%, to $6,310 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $15,870 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction of income taxes of $11,957 due to a reduction in certain tax contingencies.

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to The Six Months Ended June 30, 2006.

Net Income

Net income increased by $31,849, or 51%, to $94,878 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $63,029 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. This increase is related to an increase in net investment income from real estate partnerships, favorable group disability and group life experience, andbusiness written through our DRMS channel driven by a decrease in income taxespolicyholder benefits related to closed blocks of approximately $11,000 due primarily to a reduction in certain tax contingencies. These increases to net income were partially offset by a declinebusiness. Policyholder benefits also decreased in our small employer group health business and our group dental business.

Total Revenues

Total revenues decreased by $69,913, or 8%, to $820,628 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $890,541 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in net earned premiums and other considerations, partially offset by increases in net investment income, fees and other income and net realized gains on investments. Net earned premiums and other considerations decreased $84,753 primarily due to declines in our group disability, group dental and group life businesses as a result of the residual impact of lower sales and persistency over the past several quarters as the business continues to implement its small case strategy. Also contributing to the decrease in net earned premiums and other considerations is a decline in our small employer group health business, the transfer of our Canadian pre-funded funeral business, the loss of a client in our accidental death and dismemberment (“AD&D”) business, and the sale of the Independent – U.S. distribution channel in our pre-funded funeral business. Net investment income increased due to an increase in real estate investment income. Fees and other income increased due to the sale of the marketing rights of the Independent-U.S. distribution channel in our pre-funded funeral business.

Total Benefits, Losses and Expenses

Total benefits, losses and expenses decreased by $102,465, or 13%, to $691,855 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $794,320 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in policyholder benefits of $72,613 driven by favorable experience and lower membership. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in our group disability, group life and group dental businesses and the decline in our small employer group health business. Policyholderpolicyholder benefits also decreased due to the loss of a client in our AD&D business, the sale of the Independent–U.S. distribution channel in our pre-funded funeral business, and the transfer of our Canadian operations to an affiliate. The decrease in selling, underwriting and general expenses is due to the transfer of our Canadian pre-funded funeral business, lower commissions as a result of the sale of our Independent – U.S. distribution channel and the loss of a client in our AD&D business.unfavorable experience.

Income Taxes

Income taxes increased by $703, or 2%, to $33,895 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $33,192 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The difference in the income tax rate is due to an overall increase in pre-tax income of $32,552, and a decrease of income taxes of $10,810 due to a reduction in certain tax contingencies associated with a favorable tax settlement. In addition, income taxes were revised to reflect additional information related to 2006 tax return adjustments.

Item 3.

Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required under the reduced disclosure format.

Evaluation of disclosure controlsDisclosure Controls and procedures underProcedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Interim Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2007.March 31, 2008. Based on this evaluation, our Interim Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports we file or furnish under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods in United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC rules and forms. Further, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s first fiscal quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Our 20062007 Form 10-K described our Risk Factors. There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2007.March 31, 2008.

Not required under the reduced disclosure format.

Not required under the reduced disclosure format.

Not required under the reduced disclosure format.

The following exhibits are filed with this report. Exhibits are available upon request at the investor relations section of our website, located at www.assurant.com.

32.1		Certification of Interim Chief Executive Officer of Union Security Insurance Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on August 9, 2007.May 12, 2008.

1517