Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of ~~“accelerated~~“large accelerated filer,” ~~“large accelerated~~“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule ~~12b~~12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2008 there were ~~479,322,614~~479,346,225 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, “Discover Financial Services,” “Discover,” “DFS,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to Discover Financial Services and its subsidiaries.

We own or have rights to use the trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business, including, but not limited to: Discover, PULSE, Cashback Bonus, ~~ShopDiscover,~~Discover More Card, Discover Motiva ~~Card, Miles by Discover~~ Card, Discover Open Road Card, Discover Network and ~~Discover Network.~~Diners Club International. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included in this quarterly report are the property of their respective owners.


	February 29, 2008			November 30, 2007			May 31, 2008			November 30, 2007
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
	(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)						(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	368,914		$	362,697		$	423,373		$	362,697
Federal Funds sold		3,929,200			6,270,600			2,765,800			6,270,600
Interest-earning deposits in other banks		3,988,176			1,440,979			5,576,211			1,440,979
Commercial paper		—			11,191			—			11,191

Cash and cash equivalents		8,286,290			8,085,467			8,765,384			8,085,467
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $809,497 and $425,681 at February 29, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively)		792,979			420,837
Held-to-maturity (market value $91,881 and $100,769 at February 29, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively)		99,527			104,602
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $978,224 and $425,681 at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively)								958,784			420,837
Held-to-maturity (market value $90,555 and $100,769 at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively)								96,371			104,602

Total investment securities								1,055,155			525,439
Loan receivables:
Loans held for sale		349,072			—			714,632			—
Loan portfolio:
Credit card		19,895,527			20,345,787			18,683,242			20,345,787
Commercial loans		312,211			234,136			387,540			234,136
Other consumer loans		485,871			251,194			716,649			251,194

Total loan portfolio		20,693,609			20,831,117			19,787,431			20,831,117

Total loan receivables		21,042,681			20,831,117			20,502,063			20,831,117
Allowance for loan losses		(860,378	)		(759,925	)		(846,775	)		(759,925	)

Net loan receivables		20,182,303			20,071,192			19,655,288			20,071,192
Accrued interest receivable		122,765			123,292			131,388			123,292
Amounts due from asset securitization		2,935,494			3,041,215			2,705,638			3,041,215
Premises and equipment, net		567,475			575,229			556,030			575,229
Goodwill		255,421			255,421			255,421			255,421
Intangible assets, net		57,900			59,769			56,030			59,769
Other assets		922,578			712,678			839,911			712,678
Assets of discontinued operations		3,105,327			3,926,403			213,297			3,926,403

Total assets	$	37,328,059		$	37,376,105		$	34,233,542		$	37,376,105

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Interest-bearing deposit accounts	$	24,881,960		$	24,643,517		$	24,716,104		$	24,643,517
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts		59,816			67,796			51,545			67,796

Total deposits		24,941,776			24,711,313			24,767,649			24,711,313
Short-term borrowings		250,000			250,000			—			250,000
Long-term borrowings		1,976,147			2,134,093			1,889,909			2,134,093
Accrued interest payable		248,480			264,965			244,344			264,965
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,599,633			1,317,842			1,481,409			1,317,842
Liabilities of discontinued operations		2,657,682			3,098,470			540			3,098,470

Total liabilities		31,673,718			31,776,683			28,383,851			31,776,683
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 9)
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 10)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—			—			—			—
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 479,269,154 and 477,762,018 shares issued at February 29, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively		4,793			4,777
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 479,609,403 and 477,762,018 shares issued at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively								4,796			4,777
Additional paid-in capital		2,885,610			2,846,127			2,908,676			2,846,127
Retained earnings		2,761,159			2,717,905			2,966,053			2,717,905
Accumulated other comprehensive income		5,191			32,032
Treasury stock, at cost; 142,245 and 73,795 shares at February 29, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively		(2,412	)		(1,419	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income								(25,429	)		32,032
Treasury stock, at cost; 263,178 and 73,795 shares at May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007, respectively								(4,405	)		(1,419	)

Total stockholders’ equity		5,654,341			5,599,422			5,849,691			5,599,422

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	37,328,059		$	37,376,105		$	34,233,542		$	37,376,105


	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital				Retained Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income				Treasury Stock				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount						Retained Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Shares	Treasury Stock				Total Stockholders’ Equity			Amount							Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	(unaudited)																							(unaudited)
	(dollars and shares in thousands)																							(dollars and shares in thousands)
Balance at November 30, 2006	1	$	100	Additional Paid-in Capital			$	2,636,265			$	3,008,421			$	129,986			$	—			$	5,774,772		1	Additional Paid-in Capital	$	100	$	2,636,265		$	3,008,421		$	129,986		$	—		$	5,774,772
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—		—				233,632				—				—				233,632			—		—		—			442,874			—			—			442,874
Foreign currency translation (accumulated amount of $128,749 at February 28, 2007)	—		—		—				—				(1,236	)			—
Foreign currency translation (accumulated amount of $130,404 at May 31, 2007)																								—		—		—			—			419			—
Net unrealized losses on investment securities	—		—		—				—				(176	)			—							—		—		—			—			(132	)		—
Other	—		—		—				—				31				—							—		—		—			—			31			—

Other comprehensive loss	—		—		—				—				(1,381	)			—				(1,381	)
Other comprehensive income																								—		—		—			—			318			—			318

Total comprehensive income	—		—		—				—				—				—				232,251			—		—		—			—			—			—			443,192
Capital contribution from Morgan Stanley	—		—		21,635				—				—				—				21,635			—		—		62,320			—			—			—			62,320
Cash dividends paid to Morgan Stanley	—		—		—				(500,000	)			—				—				(500,000	)		—		—		—			(500,000	)		—			—			(500,000	)

Balance at February 28, 2007	1	$	100	$	2,657,900			$	2,742,053			$	128,605			$	—			$	5,528,658

Balance at May 31, 2007																								1	$	100	$	2,698,585		$	2,951,295		$	130,304		$	—		$	5,780,284

Balance at November 30, 2007	477,762	$	4,777	$	2,846,127			$	2,717,905			$	32,032			$	(1,419	)		$	5,599,422			477,762	$	4,777	$	2,846,127		$	2,717,905		$	32,032		$	(1,419	)	$	5,599,422
Adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48	—		—		—				(8,743	)			—				—				(8,743	)		—		—		—			(8,743	)		—			—			(8,743	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—		—				81,214				—				—				81,214			—		—		—			315,362			—			—			315,362
Foreign currency translation (accumulated amount of $28,358 at February 29, 2008)	—		—		—				—				(20,000	)			—
Foreign currency translation (accumulated amount of $0 at May 31, 2008)																								—		—		—			—			(48,358	)		—
Net unrealized losses on investment securities	—		—		—				—				(6,841	)			—							—		—		—			—			(9,103	)		—

Other comprehensive loss	—		—		—				—				(26,841	)			—				(26,841	)		—		—		—			—			(57,461	)		—			(57,461	)

Total comprehensive income	—		—		—				—				—				—				54,373			—		—		—			—			—			—			257,901
Purchases of treasury stock	—		—		—				—				—				(993	)			(993	)		—		—		—			—			—			(2,986	)		(2,986	)
Common stock issued under employee 401(k) plan	1,138		12		16,125				—				—				—				16,137			1,138		12		16,125			—			—			—			16,137
Common stock issued and stock-based compensation expense	369		4		23,409				—				—				—				23,413			709		7		46,559			—			—			—			46,566
Dividends	—		—		—				(29,217	)			—				—				(29,217	)		—		—		—			(58,471	)		—			—			(58,471	)
Other	—		—		(51	)			—				—				—				(51	)		—		—		(135	)		—			—			—			(135	)

Balance at February 29, 2008	479,269	$	4,793	$	2,885,610			$	2,761,159			$	5,191			$	(2,412	)		$	5,654,341
Balance at May 31, 2008																								479,609	$	4,796	$	2,908,676		$	2,966,053		$	(25,429	)	$	(4,405	)	$	5,849,691


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			2008			2007
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	81,214		$	233,632		$	315,362		$	442,874
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gains on sale of mortgages and installment loans		—			(422	)		—			(1,773	)
Net principal disbursed on loans originated for sale		—			(24,878	)		—			(54,709	)
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale		—			26,389			—			56,102
Impairment of disposal group		172,469			—
Loss on sale of Goldfish business								152,060			—
Loss on investments		1,184			—			32,464			—
Stock-based compensation expense		39,550			—			62,703			—
Deferred income taxes		34,403			17,368			(22,867	)		(6,775	)
Depreciation and amortization on premises and equipment		29,755			30,667			55,621			61,490
Other depreciation and amortization		30,826			31,133			60,801			63,199
Provision for loan losses		324,477			195,386			536,612			398,673
Amortization of deferred revenues		(5,587	)		(5,450	)		(9,350	)		(9,550	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in amounts due from asset securitization		103,244			(181,506	)		333,254			(400,528	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(30,053	)		(12,855	)		(47,866	)		(102,564	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		40,155			200,184			97,472			55,442

Net cash provided by operating activities		821,637			509,648			1,566,266			501,881
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from the sale of Goldfish business								69,529			—
Payments for business and other acquisitions								—			(5,000	)
Maturities of investment securities		23,105			2,307			28,706			4,449
Purchases of investment securities		(17,962	)		(4,274	)		(20,367	)		(16,847	)
Proceeds from securitization and sale of loans held for investment		2,548,650			1,576,165			4,394,802			5,294,240
Net principal disbursed on loans held for investment		(3,109,438	)		(700,288	)		(4,802,649	)		(4,795,355	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(20,359	)		(27,997	)		(45,434	)		(58,915	)

Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities		(576,004	)		845,913			(375,413	)		422,572
Cash flows from financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings		(208,973	)		(3,543,737	)
Net (decrease) in short-term borrowings								(759,312	)		(2,621,768	)
Repayment of long-term debt and bank notes		(157,677	)		—			(243,642	)		(563,579	)
Purchases of treasury stock		(993	)		—			(2,986	)		—
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		221,807			4,316,854			59,820			9,779,434
Dividends paid to Morgan Stanley		—			(500,000	)		—			(500,000	)
Dividends paid		(29,217	)		—			(58,471	)		—

Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities		(175,053	)		273,117			(1,004,591	)		6,094,087
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(23,500	)		(11	)		(24,592	)		45

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		47,080			1,628,667			161,670			7,018,585
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		8,787,095			874,357			8,787,095			874,357

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	8,834,175		$	2,503,024		$	8,948,765		$	7,892,942

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest expense	$	389,201		$	280,083		$	718,970		$	536,824

Income taxes, net of income tax refunds	$	(1,902	)	$	(52,158	)	$	129,020		$	191,471

Non-cash transactions:
Exchange of retained seller’s interest for certificated beneficial interests in DCENT	$	385,000		$	—		$	585,000		$	—

Capital contributions (to) from Morgan Stanley	$	—		$	21,635
Capital contributions from Morgan Stanley							$	—		$	62,320

Description of Business.Discover Financial Services (“DFS” or the “Company”) is a leading credit card issuer and electronic payment services company. The Company’s business segments include U.S. Card and Third-Party Payments. The U.S. Card segment includes Discover Card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses over Discover’s signature card network (the “Discover Network”) and other consumer products and services business, including prepaid and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary. The Third-Party Payments segment includes the PULSE Network (“PULSE”), an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network, and the Company’s third-party payments business.

On February 7, 2008, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell the Company’s U.K. credit card business (“Goldfish”) which represented substantially all of the Company’s International Card segment. As a result, the International Card segment is presented in discontinued operations in this report. The Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. See Note 2: Discontinued Operations ~~and Note 13: Subsequent Events~~ for further details.

Distribution.On December 19, 2006, Morgan Stanley announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the spin-off of its Discover segment. On June 30, 2007, the Company was spun-off from Morgan Stanley through the distribution of DFS shares to holders of Morgan Stanley common stock (the “Distribution”). Prior to the Distribution, the Discover segment comprised Discover Financial Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, as well as certain other subsidiaries and assets related to credit card operations in the United Kingdom, which are presented in discontinued operations, that were contributed to the Discover segment by Morgan Stanley in conjunction with the Distribution.

Basis of Presentation.The accompanying consolidated and combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated or combined financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated and combined financial statements and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These interim consolidated and combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2007 audited consolidated and combined financial statements filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007.

The financial statements presented in this quarterly report for periods on or after the Distribution are presented on a consolidated basis and include the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The financial statements for the periods prior to the Distribution are presented on a combined basis and reflect the historical combined results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Morgan Stanley subsidiaries that comprised its Discover segment (as described in the preceding section) for the periods presented. The combined statements of income for periods prior to the Distribution reflect intercompany expense allocations made to the Discover segment by Morgan Stanley for certain corporate functions such as treasury, financial control, human resources, internal audit, legal, investor relations and various other functions historically provided by Morgan Stanley. Where possible, these allocations were made on a specific identification basis. Otherwise, such expenses were allocated by Morgan Stanley based on relative percentages of headcount or some other basis depending on the nature of the cost that was allocated. These historical cost allocations may not be indicative of costs the Company has incurred since the spin-off and will incur in the future to obtain these same services as an independent entity. See Note ~~12:~~13: Related Party Transactions for further information on expenses allocated by Morgan Stanley.

The historical financial results in the combined financial statements presented for periods prior to the Distribution may not be indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the Company operated as a separate, stand-alone entity during those periods. The combined financial statements presented for those periods do not reflect any changes that have occurred or may yet occur in the financing and operations of the Company as a result of the Distribution. The Company has a capital structure different from the capital structure in the combined financial statements and accordingly, interest expense is not necessarily indicative of the interest expense the Company would have incurred as a separate, independent company. However, management believes that the combined financial statements presented for periods prior to the Distribution include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the business. All intercompany balances and transactions of the Company have been eliminated.

In ~~March~~May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162,The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“Statement No. 162”). Statement No. 162 supersedes the existing hierarchy contained in the U.S. auditing standards. The existing hierarchy was carried over to Statement No. 162 essentially unchanged. The Statement becomes effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to the auditing literature. The new hierarchy is not expected to change current accounting practice in any area.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3,Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing assumptions about renewal or extension used in estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement No. 142”). This standard is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under Statement No. 141R (discussed below) and other GAAP. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The measurement provisions of this standard will apply only to intangible assets of the Company acquired after the effective date.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“Statement No. 161”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial condition, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Statement No. 161 will impact disclosures only and will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations (“Statement No. 141R”), which replaces Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141,Business Combinations(“Statement No. 141”) issued in 2001. Whereas its predecessor applied only to business combinations in which control was obtained by transferring consideration, the revised standard applies to all transactions or other events in which one entity obtains control over another. Statement No. 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control over one or more other businesses and defines the acquisition date as the date the acquirer achieves control. Statement No. 141R requires the acquirer to recognize assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. The revised standard changes the treatment of acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs related to an acquisition that the acquirer expects but is not obligated to incur, contingent consideration associated with the purchase price and preacquisition contingencies associated with acquired assets and liabilities. Statement No. 141R retains the guidance in Statement No. 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets apart from goodwill. The revised standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the provisions of Statement No. 141R to any business acquisition which occurs on or after the date the standard becomes effective.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51, (“Statement No. 160”). Statement No. 160 will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. A noncontrolling interest (orminority interest) is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Statement No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, topics for which there had been limited authoritative guidance. Statement No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements rather than a liability or a “mezzanine equity” item. Statement No. 160 is effective on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company does not currently have any subsidiaries that get deconsolidated or for which a noncontrolling interest exists. As such, the adoption of Statement No. 160 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2007, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) ratified Issue No. 06-11,Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards(“EITF 06-11”), which clarifies the accounting for income tax benefits related to dividends paid on stock-based awards. The issue is effective for awards declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. EITF 06-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On February 7, 2008, the Company and Barclays Bank PLC entered into a definitive sale and purchase agreement relating to the sale of £129 million of net assets (equivalent to approximately $258 million) of the Company’s Goldfish business, previously reported as the International Card segment. The Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. The aggregate sale price under the agreement was £35 million (equivalent to approximately $70 million), which was paid in cash at closing and is subject to a potential post-closing adjustment.

~~In the quarter ended February 29, 2008, the~~The Company has reclassified the net assets of the Goldfish business to discontinued operations and restated prior periods for comparability. The Company recorded aafter tax income from discontinued operations of $32.6 million and an after tax loss from discontinued operations of ~~$158~~$125.0 million infor the ~~first quarter~~three and six months ended May 31, 2008, respectively. The income for the three months ended May 31, 2008 included pretax income from operations of ~~2008. This~~$21.3 million ($12.2 million after tax) and a pretax gain on the sale of the business of $14.8 million ($20.4 million after tax), which included ~~an after tax loss of $172~~$27.1 million from the ~~write-down~~realization of ~~net assets to fair value,~~cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, offset in part by indemnification and transaction costs. The results for the six months ended May 31, 2008 included a pretax loss on the sale of the business of $220.8 million ($152.0 million after tax), which included the write-down of ~~$37~~$36.7 million of other intangibles that had previously been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, ~~and~~partially offset by pretax income ~~from~~of the U.K. operations of ~~$14~~$44.9 million ($27.0 million after tax) which included gains from the sale of other assets.

Assets and liabilities of discontinued operations related to the sale of the Company’s Goldfish business were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	February 29, 2008		November 30, 2007		May 31, 2008		November 30, 2007
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	547,885	$	701,628	$	183,381	$	701,628
Loan receivables and other assets		2,557,442		3,224,775		29,916		3,224,775

Total assets		3,105,327		3,926,403		213,297		3,926,403

Liabilities:
Borrowings		2,602,908		2,925,426		—		2,925,426
Other liabilities(1)		54,774		173,044		540		173,044

Total liabilities		2,657,682		3,098,470		540		3,098,470

Net assets	$	447,645	$	827,933	$	212,757	$	827,933

The following table provides summary financial information for discontinued operations related to the sale of the Company’s Goldfish business (dollars in thousands):


	February 29, 2008			November 30, 2007			May 31, 2008			November 30, 2007
Loans held for sale	$	349,072		$	—		$	714,632		$	—
Loan portfolio:
Credit card		19,895,527			20,345,787			18,683,242			20,345,787
Commercial loans		312,211			234,136			387,540			234,136

Total credit card, including consumer and commercial		20,207,738			20,579,923			19,070,782			20,579,923
Other consumer loans		485,871			251,194			716,649			251,194

Total loan portfolio		20,693,609			20,831,117			19,787,431			20,831,117

Total loan receivables		21,042,681			20,831,117			20,502,063			20,831,117
Allowance for loan losses		(860,378	)		(759,925	)		(846,775	)		(759,925	)

Net loan receivables	$	20,182,303		$	20,071,192		$	19,655,288		$	20,071,192


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended May 31,				For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007		2008		2007		2008		2007
Net proceeds from credit card securitizations	$	2,548,650	$	1,576,165	$	1,846,152	$	3,718,075	$	4,394,802	$	5,294,240
Net proceeds from mortgage and installment loan sales		—		25,967		—		28,780		—		54,329

Total net proceeds from loan sales	$	2,548,650	$	1,602,132	$	1,846,152	$	3,746,855	$	4,394,802	$	5,348,569

~~On February 29,~~Activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Information regarding net charge-offs of interest and fee revenues on credit card loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Information regarding loan receivables that are over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest is as follows (dollars in thousands):

During the six months ended May 31, 2008, the Company exchanged ~~$385~~$585 million of its seller’s interest in the Discover Card Master Trust I for the issuance of certificated Class B and Class C notes issued by the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”), which the Company now holds as other retained beneficial interests. The seller’s interest was included in loan receivables, which was reduced as a result of this transaction. These certificated notes are classified as investment securities available-for-sale on the Company’s statement of financial condition.

~~Activity~~At May 31, 2008, the Company had $77.4 million of asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC, for which the Company recorded a $31.3 million other-than-temporary impairment during the three and six months ended May 31, 2008. These notes are no longer traded, and as such, fair value of the notes is determined utilizing a valuation analysis, reflecting an estimate of the market value of the assets held by the issuer. The Company expects that these notes may be restructured later in 2008, which, depending on the ~~allowance for loan losses is as follows (dollars~~terms, may result in ~~thousands):~~

~~Information regarding net charge-offs~~further impairment of ~~interest and fee revenues on credit card loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):~~the Company’s investment.

~~Information regarding loan receivables that are over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest is as follows (dollars in thousands):~~

The Company’s deposits consist of brokered and direct certificates of deposits, money market deposit accounts, and, to a lesser degree, deposits payable upon demand.

A summary of interest-bearing deposit accounts is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	February 29, 2008			November 30, 2007			May 31, 2008			November 30, 2007
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000	$	19,516,877		$	19,385,024		$	19,441,068		$	19,385,024
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or greater		861,739			775,717			917,155			775,717
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts		4,503,344			4,482,776			4,357,881			4,482,776

	$	24,881,960		$	24,643,517
Total interest-bearing deposits							$	24,716,104		$	24,643,517

Average annual interest rate		5.12	%		5.18	%		4.85	%		5.18	%

Certificates of deposit had the following maturities at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):


Year	Amount		Amount
2008	$	8,817,262	$	5,893,405
2009	$	5,350,988	$	5,831,219
2010	$	2,625,008	$	3,644,590
2011	$	911,376	$	1,424,221
2012	$	1,535,357	$	1,937,219
Thereafter⁽¹⁾	$	1,138,625	$	1,627,569

Long-term borrowings consist of borrowings and capital leases having original maturities of one year or more. The following table provides a summary of the outstanding amounts and general terms of the Company’s long-term borrowings (dollars in thousands):


							May 31, 2008				November 30, 2007				Maturity
Funding source	February 29, 2008		November 30, 2007		Maturity	Interest Rate	Outstanding		Interest Rate		Outstanding		Interest Rate		Maturity
Bank notes	$	249,886	$	249,856	2 / 09	3-month LIBOR + 15 basis points	$	249,917	2.87	%	$	249,856	5.03	%	February 2009
Secured borrowings		922,386		1,080,063	various (final maturity 12 / 10)	Commercial paper rate + 50 basis points		836,420	3.15	%		1,080,063	5.67	%	various (final maturity December 2010)
Unsecured borrowings:
Floating rate senior notes		400,000		400,000	6 / 10	3-month LIBOR + 53 basis points		400,000	3.43	%		400,000	6.23	%	June 2010
Fixed rate senior notes		399,242		399,222	6 / 17	6.45% fixed		399,263	6.45	%		399,222	6.45	%	June 2017

Total unsecured borrowings		799,242		799,222				799,263				799,222
Capital lease obligations		4,633		4,952	various	6.26%		4,309	6.26	%		4,952	6.26	%	various

Total long-term borrowings	$	1,976,147	$	2,134,093			$	1,889,909			$	2,134,093

The Company negotiated a 59-month $2.5 billion unsecured credit agreement that became effective July 2, 2007. The credit agreement provides for a revolving credit commitment of up to $2.5 billion (of which the ~~Company~~parent may borrow up to 30% and Discover Bank may borrow up to 100% of the revolving credit commitment). The credit agreement provides for a commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility, which can range from 0.07% to 0.175% depending on the index debt ratings. Loans outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a margin above the Federal Funds rate, LIBOR, ~~the EURIBO rate~~EURIBOR or the Euro Reference rate. The terms of the credit agreement include various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants related to the maintenance of certain capitalization and tangible net worth levels, and certain double leverage, delinquency and tier 1 capital to managed loans ratios. The credit agreement also includes customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money and bankruptcy-related defaults. The commitments may be terminated upon an event of default. As of ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, the Company had ~~not drawn down any of~~no outstanding balances due under the ~~outstanding credit.~~facility.

The Company sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans for its eligible U.S. employees. Net periodic benefit cost expensed by the Company included the following components (dollars in thousands):


	Pension						Postretirement						Pension
	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended May 31,						For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	4,206		$	4,825		$	269		$	274		$	4,206		$	4,825		$	8,412		$	9,650
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		4,998			4,951			361			328			4,998			4,951			9,996			9,902
Expected return on plan assets		(6,009	)		(5,474	)		—			—			(6,009	)		(5,474	)		(12,018	)		(10,948	)
Net amortization		(560	)		515			(116	)		(138	)		(560	)		515			(1,120	)		1,030

Net periodic benefit cost	$	2,635		$	4,817		$	514		$	464		$	2,635		$	4,817		$	5,270		$	9,634


	Postretirement
	For the Three Months Ended May 31,						For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	269		$	274		$	538		$	548
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		361			328			722			656
Net amortization		(116	)		(138	)		(232	)		(276	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	514		$	464		$	1,028		$	928

Income tax expense from continuing operations consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended					For the Three Months Ended May 31,						For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007		2008			2007			2008			2007
Current:
U.S. federal	$	127,700		$	126,902	$	161,997		$	140,497		$	289,697		$	267,399
U.S. state and local		21,752			11,143		19,622			11,689			41,374			22,832
International		(5	)		2		9			1			4			3

Total		149,447			138,047		181,628			152,187			331,075			290,234
Deferred:
U.S. federal		2,247			13,551		(51,661	)		(6,372	)		(49,414	)		7,179
U.S. state and local		407			293		(5,597	)		(485	)		(5,190	)		(192	)

Total		2,654			13,844		(57,258	)		(6,857	)		(54,604	)		6,987

Income tax expense	$	152,101		$	151,891	$	124,370		$	145,330		$	276,471		$	297,221

The following table reconciles the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate:


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended May 31,				For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007		2008		2007		2008		2007
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits	3.2		1.8		3.1		1.8		3.1		1.8
Other	0.7		0.1		0.1		(0.1	)	0.5		—

Effective income tax rate	38.9	%	36.9	%	38.2	%	36.7	%	38.6	%	36.8	%

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(“FIN 48”) on December 1, 2007. As a result of adoption, the Company recorded an $8.7 million reduction to the December 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at the date of adoption on December 1, 2007, was $242.8 million, of which $51.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits would favorably affect the effective tax rate if recognized.

The Company continues to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense, consistent with its policy prior to the adoption of FIN 48. The accrued balance of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits at December 1, 2007, was $41.0 million.

The Company is under continuous examination by the IRS and the tax authorities for various states. The tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction; for example, the current IRS examination covers 1999 through 2005. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the taxing jurisdictions resulting from these and subsequent years’ examinations. A liability for unrecognized tax benefits has been established that the Company believes is adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments. Once established, unrecognized tax benefits are adjusted only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change. It is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Based on current progress with the federal audit, it is not possible to quantify the impact such changes may have on the effective tax rate.

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. On June 30, 2007, the Distribution by Morgan Stanley was completed to the Morgan Stanley stockholders of one share of DFS common stock for every two shares of Morgan Stanley common stock held on June 18, 2007. As a result, on July 2, 2007, the Company had 477,235,927 shares of common stock outstanding and this share amount is being utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. The same number of shares is being used for diluted EPS as for basic EPS as no common stock of DFS was traded prior to July 2, 2007, and no DFS equity awards were outstanding for the prior periods.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts):


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended May 31,					For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			2008		2007			2008			2007
Numerator:
Income from continuing operations	$	238,829		$	259,818		$	201,543	$	250,256		$	440,372		$	510,074
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(157,615	)		(26,186	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax								32,605		(41,014	)		(125,010	)		(67,200	)

Net income	$	81,214		$	233,632		$	234,148	$	209,242		$	315,362		$	442,874

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		478,518			477,236			479,270		477,236			478,896			477,236
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock units		3,226			—			4,483		—			3,839			—

Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents		481,744			477,236			483,753		477,236			482,735			477,236

Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.50		$	0.54		$	0.42	$	0.52		$	0.92		$	1.06
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(0.33	)		(0.05	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax								0.07		(0.08	)		(0.26	)		(0.13	)

Net income	$	0.17		$	0.49		$	0.49	$	0.44		$	0.66		$	0.93

Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.50		$	0.54		$	0.42	$	0.52		$	0.92		$	1.06
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax		(0.33	)		(0.05	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax								0.06		(0.08	)		(0.27	)		(0.13	)

Net income	$	0.17		$	0.49		$	0.48	$	0.44		$	0.65		$	0.93

The following securities were considered anti-dilutive and therefore were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS (shares in thousands):

Lease ~~commitments.~~commitments. The Company leases various office space and equipment under capital and non-cancelable operating leases which expire at various dates through ~~2013.~~2018. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, future minimum payments on leases with remaining terms in excess of one year, ~~including those related to Goldfish,~~ consist of the following (dollars in thousands):


	February 29, 2008				May 31, 2008
	Capitalized Leases		Operating Leases		Capitalized Leases		Operating Leases
2008	$	1,185	$	4,727	$	790	$	2,932
2009		1,579		6,652		1,579		6,162
2010		1,579		4,881		1,579		4,459
2011		790		3,415		790		2,983
2012		—		3,333		—		2,900
Thereafter		—		2,406		—		17,067

Total minimum lease payments		5,133	$	25,414		4,738	$	36,503

Less: amount representing interest		500				429

Present value of net minimum lease payments	$	4,633			$	4,309

Unused commitments to extend credit. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, the Company had unused commitments to extend credit for consumer and commercial loans of approximately ~~$259 billion, including commitments related to loans of the Goldfish business.~~$215 billion. Such commitments arise primarily from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards, provided there is no violation of conditions established in the related agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which the Company can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness.

Guarantees. The Company has certain obligations under certain guarantee arrangements, including contracts and indemnification agreements that contingently require the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying (such as a security) related to an asset or a liability of a guaranteed party. Also included as guarantees are contracts that contingently require the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. The Company’s use of guarantees is disclosed below by type of guarantee.

Discontinued Operations. Under the sale and purchase agreement to sell the Company’s Goldfish business, the Company indemnified the purchasers of the Goldfish business, including Barclays Bank PLC, against certain liabilities and losses. Such indemnities are customary in sale and purchase transactions and are contingent upon the purchasers incurring liabilities or losses that are not otherwise recoverable from third parties. Indemnification obligations of the Company include those related to the enforceability and transferability of the Goldfish credit card receivables. The maximum potential payments by the Company under the enforceability and transferability indemnification obligations is £129 million, and Barclays Bank PLC must provide notice to the Company of any such claims within 12 months of the transaction closing date, March 31, 2008. At May 31, 2008, there were no material amounts recorded in the Company’s

consolidated statement of financial condition related to indemnification obligations under the agreement for the sale of the Goldfish business, and management believes that there is a low probability of any material payments under these arrangements.

Securitized Asset Representations and Warranties. As part of the Company’s securitization activities, the Company provides representations and warranties that certain securitized assets conform to specified guidelines. The Company may be required to repurchase such assets or indemnify the purchaser against losses if the assets do not meet certain conforming guidelines. Due diligence is performed by the Company to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make would be equal to the current outstanding balances of all assets subject to such securitization activities. The Company has not recorded any contingent liability in the consolidated and combined financial statements for these representations and warranties, and management believes that the probability of any payments under these arrangements is remote.

Merchant Chargeback Guarantees. The Company issues credit cards and owns and operates the Discover Network in the United States. The Company is contingently liable for certain transactions processed on the Discover Network in the event of a dispute between the cardholder and a merchant. The contingent liability arises if the disputed transaction involves a merchant or merchant acquirer with whom Discover Network has a direct relationship. If a dispute is resolved in the cardholder’s favor, the Discover Network will credit or refund the disputed amount to the Discover Network card issuer, who in turn credits its cardholder’s account. Discover Network will then charge back the transaction to the merchant or merchant acquirer. If

the Discover Network is unable to collect the amount from the merchant or merchant acquirer, it will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the cardholder. In most instances, a payment requirement by the Discover Network is unlikely to arise because most products or services are delivered when purchased, and credits are issued by merchants on returned items in a timely fashion. However, where the product or service is not provided until some later date following the purchase, the likelihood of payment by the Discover Network increases. The maximum potential amount of future payments related to these contingent liabilities is estimated to be the portion of the total Discover Network transaction volume processed to date for which timely and valid disputes may be raised under applicable law and relevant issuer and cardholder agreements. However, the Company believes that amount is not representative of the Company’s actual potential loss exposure based on the Company’s historical experience. The actual amount of the potential exposure cannot be quantified as the Company cannot determine whether the current or cumulative transaction volumes may include or result in disputed transactions.

At February 29, 2008, the Company was also contingently liable for resolution of cardmember disputes associated with credit cards issued by its U.K. subsidiary on the Mastercard and Visa network. The maximum potential amount of future payments related to these contingent liabilities is estimated to be the portion of the total U.K. cardmember sales transaction volume billed to date for which timely and valid disputes may be raised under applicable law, and relevant issuer and cardmember agreements.

The table below summarizes certain information regarding merchant chargeback ~~guarantees:~~guarantees from continuing operations:

~~The Company has not recorded any contingent liability in the consolidated and combined financial statements for this guarantee at February 29,~~As of May 31, 2008 and November 30, ~~2007.~~2007, there were no material amounts recorded for this guarantee in the Company’s consolidated and combined statements of financial condition. The Company mitigates this risk by withholding settlement from merchants and merchant acquirers or obtaining escrow deposits from certain merchant acquirers or merchants that are considered higher risk due to various factors such as time delays in the delivery of products or services and ~~concerning~~certain merchant behavior.

The table below provides information regarding the settlement withholdings and escrow deposits (dollars in thousands):

Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits are recorded in interest-bearing deposit accounts and accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107,Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, the Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate fair value. ~~To obtain~~

The following table provides the estimated fair values of financial instruments (dollars in thousands):

The Company estimates the fair value of its financial instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“Statement No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. If available, observable market prices are used ~~if available. In some~~for identical or comparable assets or liabilities. For instances in which observable market prices are not readily available, ~~for certain financial instruments and~~the Company estimates fair value ~~is determined~~ using present value or other techniques appropriate for a particular financial instrument. These techniques involve some degree of judgment and as a result are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following ~~table provides~~is a summary of the ~~estimated~~techniques utilized by the Company to derive fair ~~values~~value estimates of ~~financial instruments (dollars in thousands):~~its assets and liabilities.

Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to maturities of less than three months.

Investment securities available-for-sale. ~~The carrying values of investment~~Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at their fair values. Fair values of retained interests in Class B and C notes issued by DCENT are estimated utilizing information obtained from investment banks for investments with similar terms, capturing current market spreads. Fair values of other investments are based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for similar ~~transactions.~~transactions or information provided through third-party advisors.

Investment securities held-to-maturity. The estimated fair values of investment securities classified as held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same or comparable transactions or information provided through third-party advisors.

Net loan receivables. The Company’s loan receivables consist of loans held for sale and the loan portfolio, which includes loans to consumers and commercial loans. The carrying value of loans held for sale, which consists entirely of consumer loans, approximates fair value as a result of the short-term nature of these assets. To estimate the fair value of the remaining loan receivables, loans are aggregated into pools of similar loan types, characteristics and expected repayment terms. The fair values of the loans are estimated by discounting future cash flows using a rate at which similar loans could be made under current market conditions.

Amounts due from asset securitization. Carrying values of the portion of amounts due from asset securitization that are short-term in nature approximate their fair values. Fair values of the remaining assets

recorded in amounts due from asset securitization reflect the present value of estimated future cash flows utilizing management’s best estimate of key assumptions with regard to credit card receivable performance and interest rate environment projections.

Deposits. The carrying values of money market deposit, non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits and savings accounts approximates fair value due to the liquid nature of these deposits. For time deposits for which readily available market rates do not exist, fair values are estimated by discounting future cash flows using market rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.

Short-term borrowings. ~~The~~Short-term borrowings have original maturities of less than one year. As a result of their short-term nature, the carrying values of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. Term and overnight Federal Funds purchased are short-term in nature and have maturities of less than one year. Other short-term borrowings have variable rates of interest and are assumed to approximate fair values due to their automatic ability to reprice with changes in the market.

Long-term borrowings. Long-term borrowings include fixed and floating rate debt. The fair values of long-term borrowings having fixed rates are determined by discounting cash flows of future interest accruals at market rates currently offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities or repricing terms. The carrying values of ~~bank notes~~long-term borrowings having floating rates approximate their ~~fair values due to the quarterly repricing of interest rates to current market rates. The carrying values of secured and unsecured borrowings with variable rates are assumed to approximate~~ fair values due to their automatic ability to reprice with changes in the ~~market.~~interest rate environment.

Derivative financial instruments. ~~The~~As part of its interest rate risk management program, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements ~~as part of its interest rate risk management program. These agreements are derivative financial instruments, entered into~~ with institutions that are established dealers and that maintain certain minimum credit criteria established by the Company. The ~~estimated fair~~ values of ~~outstanding interest rate swap~~these agreements are provided through third-party advisors and are recorded in other assets at their gross positive fair values and accrued expenses and other liabilities at their gross negative fair values.

The table that follows summarizes the interest rate swap agreements outstanding (dollars in thousands):


	Notional Amount		Weighted Average Years to Maturity	Estimated Fair Value			Notional Amount		Weighted Average Years to Maturity	Estimated Fair Value
February 29, 2008
May 31, 2008
Interest rate swap agreements	$	905,500	9.4				$	713,000	10.3
Gross positive fair value				$	11,695			—		$	4,307
Gross negative fair value					(1,655	)		—			(3,210	)

Total interest rate swap agreements	$	905,500	9.4	$	10,040		$	713,000	10.3	$	1,097

November 30, 2007
Interest rate swap agreements	$	1,000,500	10.1				$	1,000,500	10.1
Gross positive fair value				$	2,643					$	2,643
Gross negative fair value					(10,112	)					(10,112	)

Total interest rate swap agreements	$	1,000,500	10.1	$	(7,469	)	$	1,000,500	10.1	$	(7,469	)

~~None of the interest rate swap agreements outstanding at February 29, 2008 and November 30, 2007 were entered into by the Company during 2008 or 2007, respectively.~~ For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 and ~~February 28,~~ 2007, other income included ~~gains~~losses of ~~$1.8~~$2.8 million and $13.4 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of these contracts that did not qualify as fair value hedges. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, other income included losses of ~~$2.5~~$0.9 million and $15.9 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of these contracts that did not qualify as fair value hedges. Interest expense includes amortization related to the fair value adjustment to interest-bearing deposits existing prior to de-designation and the basis adjustment existing on the hedged interest-bearing deposits relating to the risk being hedged. Interest expense also includes any ineffectiveness related to certain derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges. For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 and ~~February 28,~~ 2007, interest expense included ~~$6.7~~$4.6 million in contra-expense and ~~$1.2~~$0.9 million in expense, respectively, related to these contracts. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, interest expense included $11.3 million in contra-expense and $2.1 million in expense, respectively, related to these contracts.

At November 30, 2007, the Company had an outstanding foreign currency exchange contract with a notional amount of ~~£226.0~~£226 million entered into during 2007 to economically hedge short-term funding provided to a U.K. subsidiary of the Company with a non-dollar currency denomination, the borrowing of which is eliminated in consolidation. The fair value of the contract was a negative $9.4 million at November 30, 2007, and was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. ~~There were~~The Company had no outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts ~~outstanding~~ at ~~February 29, 2008.~~May 31, 2008 recorded in continuing operations. For information on foreign currency exchange contracts related to discontinued operations, see Note 2: Discontinued Operations.

~~The Company early adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,~~~~The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB~~In accordance with Statement No. ~~115~~ ~~(“Statement No. 159”), as of December 1, 2006, but has not made any fair value elections with respect to any of its eligible assets or liabilities as permitted under~~157, the ~~provisions of Statement No. 159 as of February 29, 2008. In conjunction with the adoption of Statement No. 159, the Company also early adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,~~~~Fair Value Measurements~~~~, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The~~ following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety has been determined is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a

particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. Disclosures concerning assets and liabilities measured at fair value are as follows:

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008


	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at February 29, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at May 31, 2008
Assets
Investment securities—available-for-sale	$	536	$	792,443	$	—	$	792,979	$	264	$	881,112	$	77,408	$	958,784
Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	1,952,901	$	1,952,901	$	—	$	—	$	1,780,128	$	1,780,128
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	11,695	$	—	$	11,695
Derivative financial instruments⁽²⁾									$	—	$	4,307	$	—	$	4,307
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments	$	—	$	1,655	$	—	$	1,655
Derivative financial instruments⁽²⁾									$	—	$	3,210	$	—	$	3,210

Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis


	Balance at November 30, 2007		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains Included in Income		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains		Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net		Net Transfers In and/or Out of Level 3			Balance at February 29, 2008
	Balance at November 30, 2007		Net Revaluation of Retained Interests				Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net		Net Transfers In and/or Out of Level 3		Balance at February 29, 2008				Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Income				Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net			Net Transfers In and/or Out of Level 3			Balance at May 31, 2008
Assets					Total Realized and Unrealized Gains
Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾	$	2,029,220	$	74,997	$	74,997	$	(151,316)	$	—		Balance at February 29, 2008	$	1,952,901		$	1,952,901		$	(43,825)	⁽²⁾		$	(128,948)		$	—		$	1,780,128
Investment securities—available-for-sale															$	—		$	(31,273)	⁽³⁾		$	—		$	108,681		$	77,408

~~Of the assets for which the Company utilized significant~~Changes in Level 3 ~~inputs to determine fair value~~Assets and ~~that were still held by the Company~~Liabilities Measured at ~~February 29, 2008, the unrealized gain for the three months ended February 29, 2008 was $75.0 million. The Company recorded this unrealized gain~~Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

(dollars in ~~securitization income in the consolidated and combined statements of income.~~thousands)

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the tables above may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.

At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, the Company also had assets that under certain conditions would be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which consisted of those associated with acquired businesses, including goodwill and other intangible assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition would be applicable if one or more of these assets was determined to be impaired; however, no impairment losses have occurred relative to any of these assets since they were initially recorded at acquisition. When and if recognition of these assets at their fair value is necessary, such measurements would be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs. For information on assets subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis relating to the Company’s Goldfish business, see Note 2: Discontinued Operations.

~~Additionally, at February 29,~~As of May 31, 2008, the Company had $108.7 million of asset-backed commercial paper notes of one issuer (the “notes”), which were included in investment securities available-for-sale. These notes are no longer traded, and as such,has not made any fair value elections with respect to any of its eligible assets or liabilities as permitted under the ~~notes is determined utilizing a valuation analysis performed by the investment advisor assigned by the trustee~~provisions of ~~the commercial paper program, reflecting~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an ~~estimate~~amendment of the market value of the assets held by the issuer. In 2007, the Company recorded an $11.4 million other-than-temporary impairment on these notes. No further revisions to the valuation were provided by the investment advisor during the three months ended February 29, 2008, and as such, the fair value did not change during the period. The Company continues to expect that these notes will be restructured in the remainder of 2008, which, depending on the terms, may result in further impairment of the Company’s investment.FASB Statement No. 115.

The Company’s business activities are managed in two segments: U.S. Card and Third-Party Payments.

On February 7, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Goldfish business, which represented substantially all of the Company’s International Card segment, to Barclays Bank PLC. Therefore, segment disclosures do not include the International Card segment as the U.K. credit card business is now accounted for as discontinued operations. The Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC on March 31, 2008. See Note 2: Discontinued Operations ~~and Note 13: Subsequent Events~~ for further discussion.

The business segment reporting provided to and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker is prepared using the following principles and allocation conventions:

Because the Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates performance in the lending business using data on a managed portfolio basis, segment information is provided here on a managed basis.

The following table presents segment data on a managed basis and a reconciliation to a GAAP presentation (dollars in thousands):


	Managed Basis									GAAP Basis		Managed Basis									GAAP Basis
For the Three Months Ended	U.S. Card		Third-Party Payments		Total		Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			Total		U.S. Card		Third- Party Payments		Total		Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			Total
February 29, 2008
May 31, 2008
Interest income	$	1,651,987	$	628	$	1,652,615	$	(989,813	)	$	662,802	$	1,572,164	$	533	$	1,572,697	$	(960,634	)	$	612,063
Interest expense		668,951		2		668,953		(329,512	)		339,441		550,629		—		550,629		(237,381	)		313,248

Net interest income		983,036		626		983,662		(660,301	)		323,361		1,021,535		533		1,022,068		(723,253	)		298,815
Provision for loan losses		627,068		—		627,068		(321,436	)		305,632		581,537		—		581,537		(370,568	)		210,969
Other income		602,411		34,268		636,679		338,865			975,544		455,074		37,133		492,207		352,685			844,892
Other expense		582,976		19,367		602,343		—			602,343		585,949		20,876		606,825		—			606,825

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense	$	375,403	$	15,527	$	390,930	$	—		$	390,930	$	309,123	$	16,790	$	325,913	$	—		$	325,913

February 28, 2007
May 31, 2007
Interest income	$	1,481,992	$	574	$	1,482,566	$	(870,360	)	$	612,206	$	1,601,324	$	558	$	1,601,882	$	(964,226	)	$	637,656
Interest expense		593,610		15		593,625		(341,818	)		251,807		693,837		4		693,841		(390,419	)		303,422

Net interest income		888,382		559		888,941		(528,542	)		360,399		907,487		554		908,041		(573,807	)		334,234
Provision for loan losses		406,076		—		406,076		(258,878	)		147,198		444,249		—		444,249		(299,573	)		144,676
Other income		490,003		30,682		520,685		269,664			790,349		526,304		29,248		555,552		274,234			829,786
Other expense		572,520		19,321		591,841		—			591,841		601,966		21,792		623,758		—			623,758

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense	$	399,789	$	11,920	$	411,709	$	—		$	411,709	$	387,576	$	8,010	$	395,586	$	—		$	395,586


For the Six Months Ended
May 31, 2008
Interest income												$	3,224,151	$	1,161	$	3,225,312	$	(1,950,447	)	$	1,274,865
Interest expense													1,219,580		2		1,219,582		(566,893	)		652,689

Net interest income													2,004,571		1,159		2,005,730		(1,383,554	)		622,176
Provision for loan losses													1,208,605		—		1,208,605		(692,004	)		516,601
Other income													1,057,485		71,401		1,128,886		691,550			1,820,436
Other expense													1,168,925		40,243		1,209,168		—			1,209,168

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense												$	684,526	$	32,317	$	716,843	$	—		$	716,843

May 31, 2007
Interest income												$	3,083,316	$	1,132	$	3,084,448	$	(1,834,586	)	$	1,249,862
Interest expense													1,287,447		19		1,287,466		(732,237	)		555,229

Net interest income													1,795,869		1,113		1,796,982		(1,102,349	)		694,633
Provision for loan losses													850,325		—		850,325		(558,451	)		291,874
Other income													1,016,307		59,930		1,076,237		543,898			1,620,135
Other expense													1,174,486		41,113		1,215,599		—			1,215,599

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense												$	787,365	$	19,930	$	807,295	$	—		$	807,295

Effective upon the Distribution on June 30, 2007, Morgan Stanley ceased to be a related party to the Company. Prior to the Distribution, Morgan Stanley provided a variety of products and services to the Company or on the Company’s behalf and the Company provided certain products and services to Morgan Stanley. Subsequent to the Distribution, certain arrangements with Morgan Stanley have continued in accordance with the Transition Services Agreement and other agreements by and between Morgan Stanley and the Company (see the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007). Transactions with Morgan Stanley subsequent to the Distribution are not isolated from those conducted with other unrelated third parties and are thus not included in the information provided below.

Information provided below includes the amounts of transactions with Morgan Stanley for the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. Amounts due from or to Morgan Stanley are not provided for November 30, 2007 or ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as Morgan Stanley was not a related party at either date.

In 2006, the Company began purchasing Federal Funds from Morgan Stanley Bank. ~~For~~There was no interest expense on Federal Funds purchased from Morgan Stanley Bank for the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. For the six months ended May 31, 2007, interest expense on Federal Funds purchased from Morgan Stanley Bank was $29.5 million.

In 2006, the Company began participating in the Morgan Stanley Global Wealth Management Bank Deposit Program launched by Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (“MSDW”). Under the program, MSDW ~~sweeps~~swept excess client cash into interest-bearing deposit accounts at FDIC-insured banks participating in the program. For the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, the Company paid servicing and administrative fees of ~~$7.4~~$10.5 million and $17.9 million, respectively, to MSDW.

The Company paid brokerage commissions to Morgan Stanley for the sales of certificates of deposit. These commissions totaled ~~$12.2~~$21.0 million and $34.0 for the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, respectively, and are amortized to interest expense over the lives of the related certificates of deposit. For the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, amortization of the prepaid commissions was ~~$6.5 million.~~$7.4 million and $13.9 million, respectively.

For the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, the Company paid underwriting fees on credit card securitizations to Morgan Stanley of ~~$2.1 million.~~$4.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively. Amortization of such underwriting fees ~~during~~was $2.5 million and $4.9 million for the ~~same period was $2.3 million.~~three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively.

For the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, the Company sold ~~$16.3~~$17.8 million and $34.1 million, respectively, of mortgage loans to Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (“MSCC”). The gains recognized on these sales for the ~~same period~~three and six months ended May 31, 2007, were ~~$0.4 million.~~$1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company entered into interest rate swap and foreign currency exchange contracts with various counterparties, including Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, which serves as Morgan Stanley’s principal U.S. swaps dealer, to economically hedge interest rate and currency exchange risks as part of its risk management program and under terms consistent with those that would have been offered to an unrelated third-party.

The Company had short-term and long-term debt obligations to Morgan Stanley prior to the Distribution which had all been repaid as of November 30, 2007. Interest expense on short-term obligations to Morgan Stanley was $40.7 million and $110.7 million for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively. Interest expense on long-term obligations to Morgan Stanley was ~~$70.0~~$14.5 million and ~~$16.6~~$31.1 million ~~respectively~~ for the three and six months ended ~~February 28, 2007.~~May 31, 2007, respectively.

MSCC provided transaction processing and other support services related to consumer loan products offered by the Company. The cost of providing these services was ~~$1.0~~$1.5 million and $2.5 million for the three and six months ended ~~February 28, 2007.~~May 31, 2007, respectively.

For the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, the Company received $1.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, in sublease rental income for subleasing office space to Morgan Stanley in Riverwoods, Illinois; New Albany, Ohio; and West Valley City, Utah.

For the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, the Company recorded ~~$1.2~~$1.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in rent expense for subleasing office space from Morgan Stanley in London, England and Glasgow, Scotland.

As a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, the Company was charged for certain corporate functions such as Company IT, Company Management, Finance, Legal and Compliance, and Strategy, Administration and other. The primary allocation methodologies utilized by Morgan Stanley included level of support, headcount and a formula that considered revenues, expenses and capital. Each corporate function separately determined the methodology to employ for their allocable expenses.

The table below summarizes intercompany expense allocations by functional area⁽¹⁾ (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended		For the Three Months Ended		For the Six Months Ended
	February 28, 2007		May 31, 2007		May 31, 2007
Company IT	$	1,450	$	1,158	$	2,608
Company Management⁽²⁾		5,448		5,825		11,273
Finance		5,384		6,431		11,815
Legal and Compliance		2,425		3,571		5,996
Strategy, Administration and other		6,086		5,689		11,775

Total Morgan Stanley allocations	$	20,793	$	22,674	$	43,467

The Company paid dividends to Morgan Stanley during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007 of $500.0 million.

While a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, the Company received an allocation of capital from Morgan Stanley to maintain a level of capital that management believed was appropriate to support the International Card segment. For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, capital allocated to the Company from Morgan Stanley was ~~$21.6~~$62.3 million. These amounts are reflected as non-cash contributions from Morgan Stanley in the supplemental disclosures of cash flow information in the consolidated and combined statements of cash flows.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company offers consumer loan products to its directors, executive officers and certain members of their immediate families. These products are offered on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties, and these receivables are included in the loan receivables in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition. They were not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On ~~March 19,~~June 26, 2008, the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.06 per share. The cash dividend is payable on ~~April~~July 22, 2008 to stockholders of record at the close of business on ~~April 3,~~July 1, 2008.

On March 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of the Goldfish business to Barclays Bank PLC. The aggregate sale price under the agreement was £35 million (equivalent to approximately $70 million), which was paid in cash at closing and is subject to a potential post-closing adjustment. See Note 2: Discontinued Operations for further discussion.

On ~~April 7,~~July 1, 2008, the Company announced ~~that it has signed an agreement with Citibank, N.A. to~~its purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Diners Club International for $165 million in ~~cash.~~cash from Citibank, N.A. The Company acquired the Diners Club International ~~licenses its Diners Club mark to~~network, brand, trademarks, employees, and license agreements with 44 network participants ~~who~~that issue Diners Club cards and that maintain an acceptance network consisting of ~~more than 8 million~~ merchant and cash access locations in 185 countries worldwide. Diners Club licensees are not included in this acquisition. Under the terms of the ~~agreement,~~purchase, Citibank ~~will~~has agreed to remain a significant long-term international issuer on the Diners Club network. Discover will not issue cards or extend consumer credit in international markets as a result of the transaction. ~~The acquisition is expected to close within 90 days, subject to required regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. There can~~Diners Club International will be ~~no assurance, however, that~~included in the ~~acquisition will close within 90 days, if at all. The Company plans to finance the acquisition with cash on hand.~~Company’s Third-Party Payments segment.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of Discover Financial Services’ management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report, and there is no undertaking to update or revise them as more information becomes available. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: the actions and initiatives of current and potential competitors; our ability to manage credit risks and securitize our receivables at acceptable ~~rates;~~rates and under sale accounting treatment; changes in economic variables, such as the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment and the levels of consumer confidence and consumer debt; the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices and interest rates, currency values, investments, other market fluctuations and other market indices; the availability and cost of funding and capital; access to U.S. debt and deposit markets; losses in our investment portfolio; the ability to increase or sustain Discover Card usage or attract new cardmembers and introduce new products or services; our ability to attract new merchants and maintain relationships with current merchants; our ability to successfully integrate the Diners Club International network and maintain relationships with network participants; material security breaches of key systems; unforeseen and catastrophic events; our reputation; the potential effects of technological changes; the effect of political, economic and market conditions and geopolitical events; unanticipated developments relating to lawsuits, investigations or similar matters; the impact of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory and legal ~~actions;~~actions, including the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed amendments limiting certain credit card practices; our ability to attract and retain employees; the ability to protect our intellectual property; the impact of our separation from Morgan Stanley; the impact of any potential future acquisitions; investor sentiment; and the restrictions on our operations resulting from indebtedness incurred during our separation from Morgan Stanley. Additional factors that could cause Discover Financial Services’ results to differ materially from those described below can be found under “Part II. Other Information — 1A. Risk Factors” in this quarterly report and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007 filed with the SEC and available at the SEC’s internet site (http://www.sec.gov).

We are a leading credit card issuer and electronic payment services company with one of the most recognized brands in U.S. financial services. We offer credit and prepaid cards and other financial products and services to qualified customers ~~in the United States~~ and provide payment processing and related services to merchants and financial ~~institutions in the United States.~~institutions. Our year ends on November 30 of each year.

We strive to increase net income and achieve other business objectives by growing loan receivables and increasing volume on our payments networks to generate interest and fee revenue, while controlling loan losses and expenses. Our primary revenues come from interest income earned on loan receivables, securitization income derived from the transfer of credit card loan receivables and subsequent issuance of beneficial interests through securitization transactions, and fees earned from cardmembers, merchants and issuers. Our primary expenses include funding costs (interest expense), loan losses, ~~Cardmember~~cardmember rewards, and expenses incurred to grow and service our loan receivables (e.g., compensation expense and marketing).

We ~~are actively pursuing a~~continue to make progress on our strategy to partner with third-party acquirers to increase acceptance of Discover Network cards among small and mid-size ~~merchants.~~merchants in the United States. We ~~have entered into arrangements~~are also pursuing a strategy to increase acceptance worldwide. On July 1, 2008, we announced our purchase of Diners Club International. Over the next two to three years, we expect to integrate the Diners Club International network with ~~major merchant acquirers to sign new and service existing small and mid-size merchants for acceptance of~~the Discover Network ~~cards.~~to allow Discover Network cardholders to use their cards at merchants that accept Diners Club cards around the world, and Diners Club cardholders to use their cards on the Discover Network in North America. Diners Club International is part of our Third-Party Payments segment.

Our business activities have been funded primarily through the process of asset securitization, the raising of consumer deposits, and prior to our spin-off from Morgan Stanley, intercompany lending from Morgan Stanley which has been replaced with asset-backed financing and both secured and unsecured debt. In a credit card securitization, loan receivables are first transferred to securitization trusts, from which beneficial interests are

issued to investors. We continue to own and service the accounts that generate the securitized loans. The trusts utilized by us to facilitate asset securitization transactions are not our ~~subsidiaries and are independent from us.~~subsidiaries. These trusts are excluded from our consolidated and combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Because our securitization activities qualify as sales under GAAP and accordingly are not treated as secured financing transactions, we remove credit card loan receivables equal to the amount of the investor interests in securitized loans from the consolidated statements of financial condition. As a result, asset securitizations have a significant effect on our consolidated and combined financial statements in that the portions of interest income, provision for loan losses and certain components of other income related to the securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued are no longer recorded in our consolidated and combined statements of income; however, they remain significant factors in determining the securitization income we receive on our retained beneficial interests in those transactions.

Our senior management evaluates business performance and allocates resources using financial data that is presented on a managed basis. Managed loans consist of our on-balance sheet loan portfolio, loans held for sale and loan receivables that have been securitized and against which beneficial interests have been issued. Owned loans, a subset of managed loans, refer to our on-balance sheet loan portfolio and loans held for sale and include the undivided seller’s interest we retain in our securitizations. A managed basis presentation, which is a non-GAAP presentation, involves reporting securitized loans with our owned loans in the managed basis statements of financial condition and reporting the earnings on securitized loans in the same manner as the owned loans instead of as securitization income. The managed basis presentation generally reverses the effects of securitization transactions; however, there are certain assets that arise from securitization transactions that are not reversed. Specifically, these assets are the cash collateral accounts that provide credit enhancement to the investors in the transactions and cardmember payments allocated to the securitized loans, both of which are held at the trusts. These assets also include the interest-only strip receivable, reflecting the estimated fair value of the excess cash flows allocated to securitized loans and retained certificated beneficial interests. Income derived from these assets representing interest earned on accounts at the trusts, changes in the fair value of the interest-only strip receivable and interest income on investment securities also are not reversed in a managed presentation. See “— Qualifying Special Purpose Entities” below for more information.

Management believes it is useful for investors to consider the credit performance of the entire managed loan portfolio to understand the quality of loan originations and the related credit risks inherent in the owned portfolio and retained interests in our securitizations. Managed loan data is also relevant because we service the securitized and owned loans, and the related accounts, in the same manner without regard to ownership of the loans.

Financial measures using managed data are non-GAAP financial measures. Whenever managed data is presented in this quarterly report, a reconciliation of the managed data to the most directly comparable GAAP-basis financial measure is provided. See “—GAAP to Managed Data Reconciliations.”

In the ~~first quarter of~~three months ended May 31, 2008, we ~~recorded a loss~~reported after tax income from discontinued operations ~~net~~ of ~~tax, of $158 million. This included $172~~$32.6 million ~~related to the write-down~~largely as a result of the ~~net assets~~realization of ~~the Goldfish business to lower of cost or market partially offset by $14 million of~~cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments and income from the U.K. operations, ~~which included~~including gains from the sale of other assets, partially offset by transaction and indemnification costs. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, we recorded an after tax loss of $125.0 million from the U.K. operations largely due to a loss of $152.0 million on the sale of the business partially offset by income from the U.K. operations of $27.0 million, including gains from the sale of other assets. ~~In addition,~~Additionally, as of the first quarter of 2008, assets and liabilities of the U.K. operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations and historical periods have been restated for comparability.

During the three and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, the Federal Reserve decreased the Federal Funds target rate by ~~150~~100 and 250 basis points, respectively, to ~~3.00%, which~~2.00%. This led to a similar ~~150~~100 and 250 basis point decrease in the prime rate for the three and six months ended May 31, 2008, respectively, as compared to a constant Federal Funds target rate of 5.25% throughout the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. Certain of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have floating rates which move closely with these short-term market indices. As a result, the interest yield on variable rate interest-earning assets and the cost of floating rate interest-bearing liabilities decreased during the current period. In addition, the yield on interest-earning assets was impacted by a higher mix of lower yielding assets, as compared to the three and six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, related to the maintenance of our ~~$8.3~~$8.4 billion liquidity reserve. To mitigate margin compression, we reduced low-rate balance transfer volume and implemented higher promotional pricing on new balance transfers, reflecting a shift toward tighter marketing and credit criteria.

~~Delinquencies~~During the first half of 2008, the U.S. economic environment deteriorated, the credit environment worsened and ~~charge-offs rose~~the economy suffered the negative impacts of downturns in the ~~three months ended February 29, 2008 which we primarily attribute to~~ U.S. housing markets and mortgage ~~issues and a deteriorating economic environment.~~industry. As a result, we ~~increased~~experienced rising charge-offs and delinquencies during the ~~allowance for loan losses by $100 million through a charge~~six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the ~~provision for~~six months ended May 31, 2007, we increased our loan ~~losses. In contrast,~~loss reserve rate to 4.28% and for the three months ended ~~February 28, 2007,~~May 31, 2008, we ~~reduced~~recorded a $44.5 million unfavorable net revaluation of our retained interest in securitizations. The unfavorable net revaluation of our retained interest in securitization included a decline in the ~~allowance~~value of our cash collateral accounts as a result of higher long-term interest rate projections.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has projects underway to amend and clarify Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,Accounting for ~~loan losses~~Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,as amended (“Statement No. 140”) and FASB Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”). As part of these projects, in April 2008, FASB members proposed the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity (“QSPE”) which is defined in Statement No. 140. QSPEs are currently exempt from the consolidation provisions of FIN 46R and as a result, amendments to that standard are being considered as well. Revised guidance has not been finalized for either standard. The FASB will issue its proposed amendments for public comment and, based upon public comments received and other considerations, may revise the amendments before issuing final guidance. The proposed changes may make it more difficult for us to maintain or establish sale accounting treatment in connection with transfers of financial assets in securitization transactions and could result in consolidation of the securitization entities by ~~$41 million through~~us. This would have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. For example, the impact of the potential consolidation, if applied as of May 31, 2008, may require us to add approximately $26 billion of securitized receivables to our assets, add the related debt issued to third-party investors to our

liabilities, and reclassify amounts due from securitization. The effective dates of amended standards have not yet been determined but could be as early as December 2008. For more information, see“Future guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board may impact the accounting treatment of the securitization of our credit card receivables, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, reserve requirements, capital requirements, liquidity, cost of funds and operations”under “Part II. Other Information—Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this quarterly report.

The Federal Reserve Board has proposed amendments to regulations that would place limitations on certain credit card practices, including, but not limited to, restrictions on applying rate increases to existing balances, payment allocation and default pricing. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated it hopes to publish final rules by the ~~provision for loan losses reflecting lower loan receivables and~~end of the year. For more ~~favorable delinquency and charge-off rates.~~information, see “The Federal Reserve Board’s proposed amendments to regulations, if adopted as proposed, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations” under “Part II. Other Information—Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this quarterly report.

The remaining discussion provides a summary of the results of operations for the three and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 and ~~February 28,~~ 2007, as well as the financial condition at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007. All information and comparisons are based on continuing operations.

We manage our business activities in two segments: U.S. Card and Third-Party Payments. In compiling the segment results that follow, the U.S. Card segment bears all overhead costs that are not specifically associated with a particular segment and all costs associated with Discover Network marketing, servicing and infrastructure, with the exception of an allocation of direct and incremental costs driven by the Third-Party Payments segment.

U.S. Card.The U.S. Card segment ~~offers~~includes Discover Card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses over ~~the Discover Network. Also included within the U.S. Card segment are our~~Discover’s signature card network and other consumer products and services ~~businesses,~~business, including prepaid and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through our ~~subsidiary,~~ Discover ~~Bank.~~Bank subsidiary.

Third-Party Payments.The Third-Party Payments segment includes ~~the~~ PULSE ~~network~~Network (“PULSE”), an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network, and our third-party payments ~~businesses.~~business.

The following table presents segment data on a managed basis and a reconciliation to a GAAP presentation (dollars in thousands):


	Managed Basis						Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			GAAP Basis		Managed Basis						Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾				GAAP Basis
For the Three Months Ended	U.S. Card		Third-Party Payments		Total		Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			Total		U.S. Card		Third- Party Payments		Total					Total
February 29, 2008
May 31, 2008																		Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾
Interest income	$	1,651,987	$	628	$	1,652,615		$ (989,813	)	$	662,802	$	1,572,164	$	533	$	1,572,697	$	(960,634	)		$	612,063
Interest expense		668,951		2		668,953		(329,512	)		339,441		550,629		—		550,629		(237,381	)			313,248

Net interest income		983,036		626		983,662		(660,301	)		323,361		1,021,535		533		1,022,068		(723,253	)			298,815
Provision for loan losses		627,068		—		627,068		(321,436	)		305,632		581,537		—		581,537		(370,568	)			210,969
Other income		602,411		34,268		636,679		338,865			975,544		455,074		37,133		492,207		352,685				844,892
Other expense		582,976		19,367		602,343		—			602,343		585,949		20,876		606,825		—				606,825

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense	$	375,403	$	15,527	$	390,930	$	—		$	390,930	$	309,123	$	16,790	$	325,913	$	—			$	325,913

February 28, 2007
May 31, 2007
Interest income	$	1,481,992	$	574	$	1,482,566	$	(870,360	)	$	612,206	$	1,601,324	$	558	$	1,601,882	$	(964,226	)		$	637,656
Interest expense		593,610		15		593,625		(341,818	)		251,807		693,837		4		693,841		(390,419	)			303,422

Net interest income		888,382		559		888,941		(528,542	)		360,399		907,487		554		908,041		(573,807	)			334,234
Provision for loan losses		406,076		—		406,076		(258,878	)		147,198		444,249		—		444,249		(299,573	)			144,676
Other income		490,003		30,682		520,685		269,664			790,349		526,304		29,248		555,552		274,234				829,786
Other expense		572,520		19,321		591,841		—			591,841		601,966		21,792		623,758		—				623,758

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense	$	399,789	$	11,920	$	411,709	$	—		$	411,709	$	387,576	$	8,010	$	395,586	$	—			$	395,586

For the Six Months Ended
May 31, 2008
Interest income												$	3,224,151	$	1,161	$	3,225,312	$	(1,950,447	)		$	1,274,865
Interest expense													1,219,580		2		1,219,582		(566,893	)			652,689

Net interest income													2,004,571		1,159		2,005,730		(1,383,554	)			622,176
Provision for loan losses													1,208,605		—		1,208,605		(692,004	)			516,601
Other income													1,057,485		71,401		1,128,886		691,550				1,820,436
Other expense													1,168,925		40,243		1,209,168		—				1,209,168

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense												$	684,526	$	32,317	$	716,843	$	—			$	716,843

May 31, 2007
Interest income												$	3,083,316	$	1,132	$	3,084,448	$	(1,834,586	)		$	1,249,862
Interest expense													1,287,447		19		1,287,466		(732,237	)			555,229

Net interest income													1,795,869		1,113		1,796,982		(1,102,349	)			694,633
Provision for loan losses													850,325		—		850,325		(558,451	)			291,874
Other income													1,016,307		59,930		1,076,237		543,898				1,620,135
Other expense													1,174,486		41,113		1,215,599		—				1,215,599

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense												$	787,365	$	19,930	$	807,295	$	—			$	807,295

The segment discussions that follow for the three and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 and ~~February 28,~~ 2007 are on a managed basis.

The U.S. Card segment reported pretax income of ~~$375.4~~$309.1 million for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, down 6%20%, as compared to ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. The decrease in pretax income was driven by higher provision for loan losses and lower other income, which was partially offset by an increase in net interest income. Provision for loan losses increased $137.3 million, or 31%, as a result of higher net charge-offs, which reflects current economic conditions and recent delinquency trends. Other income decreased $71.2 million, or 14%, due to a $44.5 million unfavorable net revaluation of our retained interest in securitizations as compared to a $36.4 million favorable net revaluation in the second quarter of 2007, and a $31.3 million write-down of our investment in asset-backed commercial paper notes in Golden Key U.S. LLC, partially offset by higher discount and interchange revenue due to growth in sales volume and lower rewards costs related to revised forfeiture assumptions. Net interest income increased $114.0 million, or 13%, reflecting widening net interest margins benefiting from lower cost of funds and a reduction in, and higher rates on, promotional balances.

The U.S. Card segment reported pretax income of $684.5 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008, down 13%, as compared to May 31, 2007. The decrease in pretax income was driven by higher provision for loan losses, which was ~~largely~~partially offset by increased net interest ~~income and other~~ income. Provision for loan losses increased ~~$221.0~~$358.3 million, or ~~54%~~42%, as a result of higher ~~net~~ charge-offs and a higher allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses increased due to loan growth and an increase in the loan loss reserve rate, which is reflective of the current credit environment and recent delinquency trends. Net interest income increased ~~$94.7~~$208.7 million, or ~~11%~~12%, ~~due to higher~~as interest income ~~as a result of~~benefited from higher average loan receivables ~~and~~as well as an increase in ~~interest yield, as a reduction in low-rate balance transfer volume more than offset lower pricing on variable-rate accounts. This increase in interest income was~~the level of interest-earning assets related to the liquidity reserve, partially offset by ~~higher interest expense, reflecting increased~~an increase in borrowings ~~offset by lower funding costs. Other income increased $112.4 million, or 23%, largely due~~ to support the ~~favorable revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable as well as higher discount and interchange revenue due to growth in sales.~~asset growth.

For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, managed loans grew 2%, to ~~$47.5 billion, driven by higher~~$47.8 billion. This increase in loans is attributable to an increase in installment loans and an increase in sales volume of ~~$23.2~~$22.5 billion, up 5%2% over last ~~year, partially offset by a decrease in a balance transfer volume reflecting a shift to tighter marketing and credit criteria.~~year. The weakening economic environment adversely impacted cardmember delinquencies and charge-offs. The managed ~~credit card~~ over 30 day delinquency rate ~~of 3.93%~~for the segment, including non-credit card loans, was 623.81%, 84 basis points higher than last year, and the managed credit card ~~net charge-off~~over 30 day delinquency rate ~~of 4.37%~~ was 3.85%, up 5188 basis points from last year. For the three months ended May 31, 2008, the managed segment and credit card charge-off rates were 4.99% and 5.05%, up 102 and 108 basis points from the three months ended May 31, 2007, respectively. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, the managed segment and credit card charge-off rates were 4.66% and 4.70%, up 75 and 78 basis points from the comparable prior year period, respectively.

The Third-Party Payments segment reported pretax income of ~~$15.5~~$16.8 million for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, ~~up 30% as compared to February 28,~~more than double the pretax income of $8.0 million reported for the three months ended May 31, 2007. The increase in pretax income was driven by

increased revenues from transaction growth and an increase in fee revenue along with ~~controlled expenses. The three months ended February 29, 2008 also included higher marketing~~a decline in transaction processing and ~~pricing incentives, as well as $3 million in revenue related to a one-time contractual payment.~~consulting costs. Third-Party Payment debit and credit volume was ~~$26.3~~$29.4 billion, up ~~24%~~33% compared to last year, reflecting the impact of ~~financial institution~~new issuer signings in 2007 as well as increased volumes from existing ~~financial institutions.~~issuers.

The Third-Party Payments segment reported pretax income of $32.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008, up 62%, as compared to May 31, 2007. The increase in pretax income was driven by increased revenues from transaction growth, $3 million in revenue related to one-time contractual payment, a decline in transaction processing and consulting costs and an increase in fee revenue, partially offset by marketing and pricing incentives. Third-Party Payments debit and credit volume was $55.8 billion, up 29% compared to last year, reflecting the impact of new issuer signings in 2007 as well as increased volumes from existing issuers.

Securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued to third parties are removed from our statements of financial condition. Instances in which we retain certificated beneficial interests in the securitization transactions result in a reduction to loan receivables of the amount of the retained interest and a corresponding increase in investment securities—available-for-sale. The portions of interest income, provision for loan losses and certain components of other income related to the securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued are no longer recorded in our statements of income; however, they remain significant factors in determining the securitization income we receive on our retained beneficial interests in those transactions. Management believes it is useful for investors to consider the credit performance of the entire managed loan portfolio to understand the quality of loan originations and the related credit risks inherent in the owned portfolio and retained interests in securitization. Loan receivables on a GAAP (or owned) basis and related performance measures, including yield, charge-offs and delinquencies can vary from those presented on a managed basis. Generally, loan receivables included in the securitization trusts are derived from accounts that are more seasoned, while owned loan receivables represent a greater concentration of newer accounts, occurring as a result of the degree to which receivables from newer accounts are added to the trusts. The seasoning of an account is measured by the age of the account relationship. In comparison to more seasoned accounts, loan receivables of newer accounts typically carry lower interest yields resulting from introductory offers to new cardmembers and lower charge-offs and delinquencies.

Beginning with “—Earnings Summary,” the discussion of GAAP results is presented on a consolidated and combined basis with any material differences between segment performance specifically identified. The table that follows provides a GAAP to managed data reconciliation of loan receivables and related statistics that are impacted by asset securitization:


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended May 31,						For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)
Balance Sheet Statistics
Loan Receivables
Total Loans
GAAP Basis	$	21,042,681		$	19,727,837		$	20,502,063		$	19,938,986		$	20,502,063		$	19,938,986
Securitization Adjustment		26,457,729			26,629,021			27,339,428			27,014,916			27,339,428			27,014,916

Managed Basis	$	47,500,410		$	46,356,858		$	47,841,491		$	46,953,902		$	47,841,491		$	46,953,902

Total Assets
Average Total Loans
GAAP Basis	$	34,222,732		$	26,373,020		$	19,890,330		$	18,673,525		$	20,702,505		$	20,287,228
Securitization Adjustment		27,714,769			26,349,579			27,581,747			27,622,771			27,461,315			26,340,183

Managed Basis	$	61,937,501		$	52,722,599		$	47,472,077		$	46,296,296		$	48,163,820		$	46,627,411

Interest Yield
GAAP Basis								10.40	%		10.69	%		10.37	%		10.61	%
Securitization Adjustment								13.86	%		13.85	%		14.21	%		13.97	%
Managed Basis								12.41	%		12.58	%		12.56	%		12.50	%
Net Principal Charge-off Rate
GAAP Basis								4.49	%		3.47	%		4.15	%		3.47	%
Securitization Adjustment								5.34	%		4.30	%		5.04	%		4.25	%
Managed Basis								4.99	%		3.97	%		4.66	%		3.91	%
Delinquency Rate (over 30 days)
GAAP Basis								3.54	%		2.71	%		3.54	%		2.71	%
Securitization Adjustment								4.01	%		3.16	%		4.01	%		3.16	%
Managed Basis								3.81	%		2.97	%		3.81	%		2.97	%
Delinquency Rate (over 90 days)
GAAP Basis								1.81	%		1.31	%		1.81	%		1.31	%
Securitization Adjustment								2.07	%		1.54	%		2.07	%		1.54	%
Managed Basis								1.96	%		1.44	%		1.96	%		1.44	%
Credit Card Loans
Credit Card Loans
GAAP Basis	$	20,556,810		$	19,636,991		$	19,785,414		$	19,849,401		$	19,785,414		$	19,849,401
Securitization Adjustment		26,457,729			26,629,021			27,339,428			27,014,916			27,339,428			27,014,916

Managed Basis	$	47,014,539		$	46,266,012		$	47,124,842		$	46,864,317		$	47,124,842		$	46,864,317

Average Credit Card Loans
GAAP Basis	$	21,148,252		$	21,841,166		$	19,275,733		$	18,581,153		$	20,206,876		$	20,193,248
Securitization Adjustment		27,339,560			25,029,093			27,581,747			27,622,771			27,461,315			26,340,183

Managed Basis	$	48,487,812		$	46,870,259		$	46,857,480		$	46,203,924		$	47,668,191		$	46,533,431

Interest Yield
GAAP Basis		10.35	%		10.55	%		10.40	%		10.72	%		10.37	%		10.63	%
Securitization Adjustment		14.56	%		14.10	%		13.86	%		13.85	%		14.21	%		13.97	%
Managed Basis		12.72	%		12.45	%		12.43	%		12.59	%		12.58	%		12.52	%

Net Principal Charge-off Rate
GAAP Basis		3.90	%		3.48	%		4.63	%		3.48	%		4.25	%		3.48	%
Securitization Adjustment		4.73	%		4.19	%		5.34	%		4.30	%		5.04	%		4.25	%
Managed Basis		4.37	%		3.86	%		5.05	%		3.97	%		4.70	%		3.92	%

Delinquency Rate (over 30 days)
GAAP Basis		3.69	%		2.97	%		3.63	%		2.71	%		3.63	%		2.71	%
Securitization Adjustment		4.11	%		3.56	%		4.01	%		3.16	%		4.01	%		3.16	%
Managed Basis		3.93	%		3.31	%		3.85	%		2.97	%		3.85	%		2.97	%

Delinquency Rate (over 90 days)
GAAP Basis		1.86	%		1.46	%		1.87	%		1.31	%		1.87	%		1.31	%
Securitization Adjustment		2.08	%		1.75	%		2.07	%		1.54	%		2.07	%		1.54	%
Managed Basis		1.98	%		1.63	%		1.99	%		1.44	%		1.99	%		1.44	%

In preparing the consolidated and combined financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management must make judgments and use estimates and assumptions about the effects of matters that are uncertain. For estimates that involve a high degree of judgment and subjectivity, it is possible that different estimates could reasonably be derived for the same period. For estimates that are particularly sensitive to changes in economic or market conditions, significant changes to the estimated amount from period to period are also possible. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in the consolidated and combined financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts in the consolidated and combined financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and, in certain cases, could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition. Management has identified the policies related to the estimation of the allowance for loan losses, the accounting for asset securitization transactions, interest income recognition, the accrual of cardmember rewards cost, the evaluation of goodwill for potential impairment and accrual of income taxes as critical accounting policies.

These critical accounting policies are discussed in greater detail in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007. That discussion can be found within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading Critical Accounting Policies. There have not been any material changes in the critical accounting policies from those discussed in our 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007.

The following table outlines changes in the consolidated and combined statements of income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Three Months Ended May 31,				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Six Months Ended May 31,				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007		$			%		2008		2007		$			%		2008		2007		$			%
Interest income	$	662,802	$	612,206	$	50,596		8	%	$	612,063	$	637,656	$	(25,593	)	(4	%)	$	1,274,865	$	1,249,862	$	25,003		2	%
Interest expense		339,441		251,807		87,634		35	%		313,248		303,422		9,826		3	%		652,689		555,229		97,460		18	%

Net interest income		323,361		360,399		(37,038	)	(10	%)		298,815		334,234		(35,419	)	(11	%)		622,176		694,633		(72,457	)	(10	%)
Provision for loan losses		305,632		147,198		158,434		108	%		210,969		144,676		66,293		46	%		516,601		291,874		224,727		77	%

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		17,729		213,201		(195,472	)	(92	%)		87,846		189,558		(101,712	)	(54	%)		105,575		402,759		(297,184	)	(74	%)
Other income		975,544		790,349		185,195		23	%		844,892		829,786		15,106		2	%		1,820,436		1,620,135		200,301		12	%
Other expense		602,343		591,841		10,502		2	%		606,825		623,758		(16,933	)	(3	%)		1,209,168		1,215,599		(6,431	)	(1	%)

Income from continuing operations before income tax expense		390,930		411,709		(20,779	)	(5	%)		325,913		395,586		(69,673	)	(18	%)		716,843		807,295		(90,452	)	(11	%)
Income tax expense		152,101		151,891		210		0	%		124,370		145,330		(20,960	)	(14	%)		276,471		297,221		(20,750	)	(7	%)

Income from continuing operations	$	238,829	$	259,818	$	(20,989	)	(8	%)	$	201,543	$	250,256	$	(48,713	)	(19	%)	$	440,372	$	510,074	$	(69,702	)	(14	%)

Income from continuing operations for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 was ~~$238.8~~$201.6 million, down 8%19% compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, driven by lower net interest income and higher provision for loan losses. Net interest income decreased $35.4 million due to a decrease in interest income and an increase in interest expense. The provision for loan losses increased reflecting higher net charge-offs as a result of the weakening economic environment.

Income from continuing operations for the six months ended May 31, 2008 was $440.4 million, down 14% compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, driven by lower net interest income and higher provision for loan losses, partially offset by higher other income. Net interest income decreased ~~$37.0~~$72.5 million due to an increase in

interest expense, partially offset by an increase in interest income. The provision for loan losses increased reflecting ~~an increase in the level of~~higher net charge-offs and a higher allowance for loan losses ~~and higher net charge-offs~~ as a result of the weakening economic environment. Other income increased primarily due to higher securitization income which resulted from higher excess spread on securitized ~~loans and a higher net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable.~~loans.

Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets which we own and the interest expense incurred to finance those assets. Net interest margin states the interest income, net of interest expense, as a percentage of total interest-earning assets. Our interest-earning assets consist primarily of loan receivables, certain retained interests in securitization transactions included in amounts due from asset securitization ~~certain cash~~ and ~~cash equivalents, including~~investment securities, and our liquidity reserve which includes Federal Funds sold ~~maintained primarily for liquidity purposes,~~ and ~~investment securities. Because the investor~~bank deposits. Investor interests in securitization transactions that have been transferred to third parties are not assets ~~owned by us, they are~~which we own, and accordingly, have been excluded from interest-earning assets. Similarly, interest income does not ~~included in interest-earning assets nor is~~include the interest yield on the related ~~loans included in interest income.~~loans.

Interest income is influenced by the ~~level~~amount of interest-earning assets we own, the most significant of which is our loan receivables. ~~The level of~~Our loan receivables can be influenced by portfolio growth strategies, cardmember spending and payment behavior, and changes in the ~~level~~amount of our securitized loans. Typically, new securitization transactions have the effect of decreasing loan receivables, whereas maturities of existing securitization transactions increase loan receivables. Interest income is also influenced by ~~the level of~~changes in certain amounts due from asset securitization, which are the largest component of other interest-earning ~~assets, and relate to certain assets retained by us in securitization transactions.~~assets. The levels of these assets are impacted by securitization maturities and can vary in relation to the level of securitized loans. Additionally, the liquidity reserve, which may vary based on market conditions and liquidity targets, has an impact on interest income.

Changes in the interest rate environment can influence the interest yield earned on interest rate sensitive assets, and accordingly impact interest income. Credit card loan receivables ~~are our largest asset and~~ earn interest at both fixed rates as well as floating rates ~~aligned with~~tied to the prime ~~rate. The~~rate, the mix of ~~fixed and floating rates earned on credit card loan receivables~~which can vary over time. During the three months and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, ~~and February 28, 2007,~~ average credit card loan receivables earning interest at floating rates ~~represented 43%~~decreased to 40% and ~~59%~~42%, respectively, of average loan ~~receivables.~~receivables as compared to 56% and 58% during the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, respectively. The ~~shift~~decreases in the percentage of floating rate credit card loan receivables ~~from floating to fixed rates since the first quarter of 2007~~ helped to minimize the adverse impact on interest yield of the ~~recent~~ declining interest rate ~~environment on floating~~environment. Other interest rate assets. During the three months ended February 29, 2008, the prime rate decreased 150 basis points to 6.00% as compared to a constant level of 8.25% during the three months ended February 28, 2007. Oursensitive assets, specifically our liquidity reserve ~~including Federal Funds sold,~~ and certain ~~amounts due from asset~~retained interests in securitization ~~are our other significant interest-earning assets. These assets earn interest at floating rates tied to short-term rates aligned with market indices, and accordingly are more~~transactions, also were adversely impacted by the declining interest rate ~~sensitive. Recent decreases in the interest rate environment have resulted in significant decreases in interest yield on these assets in comparison to the first quarter of 2007.~~environment.

Credit performance is another factor which influences interest ~~income.~~yield of loan receivables. Charge-offs related to finance charge balances are recorded as a reduction to interest income. Accordingly, an increase in the level of finance charge charge-offs can adversely impact interest ~~income~~yield and interest ~~yield.~~income.

Interest-bearing liabilities reflect our funding requirements and consist primarily of deposits and, ~~short- and long-term~~to a lesser degree, borrowings. We incur interest expense on our interest-bearing liabilities at fixed ~~and~~rates as well as floating ~~rates.~~rates which are tied to various short-term market indices. Accordingly, changes in the interest rate environment, changes in the percentage of floating rate interest-bearing liabilities and the replacement of maturing debt can impact interest expense. During the three months ended February 29, 2008, floating average interest-bearing liabilities as a percentage of total average interest-bearing liabilities decreased to approximately 39% from approximately 61% for the three months ended February 28, 2007. This decrease reflected a rise in fixed rate funding, specifically related to growth in time deposits to support our liquidity reserve. The three months ended February 29, 2008 reflected a higher cost of funds on time deposits than the respective prior year period, which was related to deposit growth strategies during the first half of 2007 before interest rates began to decline. These impacts were more than offset by lower funding costs related to our floating rate debt as a result of the recent declining interest rate environment.

Interest expense also includes the effects of ~~any~~certain interest rate swaps we enter into as part of our interest rate risk management program. ~~The program is designed to reduce~~During the volatility of earnings resulting from changes in interest rates by having a financing portfolio that reflects the existing repricing schedules of loan receivables as well as our right, with notice to cardmembers, to reprice certain fixed orthree and six months ended May 31, 2008, floating rate ~~loan receivables~~average interest-bearing liabilities as a percentage of total average interest-bearing liabilities were 34% and 36%, respectively, as compared to ~~a new~~45% and 52% for the respective prior year comparisons. The decreasing interest rate inenvironment favorably impacted our funding costs during the ~~future.~~three month and six months ended May 31, 2008.

Net interest income for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 decreased ~~$37.0~~$35.4 million, or 11%, as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007, due to a decrease in interest income as well as an increase in interest expense. Net interest income for the six months ended May 31, 2008 decreased $72.5 million, or 10%, as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28, 2007. The decrease in net interest income was~~May 31, 2007, due to an increase in interest expense, partially offset by an increase in interest income.

For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, interest income ~~increased $50.6~~decreased $25.6 million, or 8%4%, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, due to ~~$7.2 billion higher average interest-earning assets offset in part by~~ a ~~167~~144 basis point decrease in the interest ~~yield. The increase~~yield, offset in ~~interest-earning assets reflected the establishment of our liquidity reserve and~~part by an increase of $4.2 billion in ~~amounts due from asset securitization, reflecting an increase in cardholder payments held by the trust on behalf of investors related to a higher level of maturities of existing securitizations.~~average interest-earning assets. The decrease in the interest yield reflected a higher mix of lower yielding assets related to ~~the establishment of the~~a higher liquidity reserve as well as the impact of ~~the recent~~a declining interest rate environment on floating rate interest-earning assets. The interest yield ~~on credit card loan receivables~~ was also adversely impacted, but to a lesser degree, by an increase in finance charge charge-offs related to recent higher charge-off ~~rates. The shift in~~rates on our credit card loan ~~receivables to~~receivables. The increase in interest-earning assets reflected a higher percentage of fixed rates and the impact of tighter marketing and credit criteria related to new balance transfer activity helped to mitigate these adverse impacts on the interest yield. The higher level of interest-earning assets and the lower yield adversely resulted in a 183 basis point decline in net interest margin for the three months ended February 29, 2008 as compared to the three months ended February 28, 2007.liquidity reserve.

For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, interest expense increased ~~$87.6~~$9.8 million, or ~~35%~~3%, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, due to a ~~$7.2~~$4.1 billion higher level of funding to support the increase in interest-earning assets, offset in part by ~~an 11~~a 64 basis point decrease in the average cost of funds. ~~Additional funding was provided through the issuance of certificates of deposit, money market deposits and long-term debt, offset in part by a~~The decrease in ~~short-term borrowings. The lower comparative~~the cost of funds reflected the impact of a declining interest rate environment on ~~both~~ floating rate interest-bearing liabilities ~~and the issuance of new certificates of deposits at comparative lower interest rates resulted in~~as well as a decrease in the cost of ~~funds~~issuing new certificates of deposits as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007.

For the six months ended May 31, 2008, interest income increased $25.0 million, or 2%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, due to $5.7 billion higher average interest-earning assets, offset in part by a 152 basis point decrease in the interest yield. The increase in average interest-earning assets reflected a higher average liquidity reserve level as we maintain a higher liquidity reserve in response to current economic conditions. During the six months ended May 31, 2007, our average liquidity reserve level was lower as we established our initial liquidity reserve in anticipation of the spin-off. Similar to the three months ended May 31, 2008, the decrease in the interest yield reflected the impact of a declining interest rate environment.

For the six months ended May 31, 2008, interest expense increased $97.5 million, or 18%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, due to a $5.7 billion higher level of funding to support the increase in interest-earning assets, offset in part by a 39 basis point decrease in the average cost of funds. Similar to the three months ended May 31, 2008, the cost of funds was favorably impacted by a declining interest rate environment as well as a decrease in the cost of issuing new certificates of deposits as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007.

The higher level of interest-earning assets and the lower yield resulted in a 102 basis point decline in net interest margin for the three months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the prior year respective period. The higher level of interest-earning assets and the lower yield caused a 137 basis point decrease in net interest margin for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to prior year respective period.

The following tables provide further analysis of net interest income, net interest margin and the impact of rate and volume changes (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended														For the Three Months Ended
	February 29, 2008							February 28, 2007							May 31, 2008							May 31, 2007
	Average Balance			Rate		Interest		Average Balance			Rate		Interest		Average Balance			Rate		Interest		Average Balance			Rate		Interest
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits in other banks	$	2,222,748		4.06	%	$	22,437	$	—		—		$	—	$	5,192,545		2.62	%	$	34,239	$	—		—		$	—
Federal Funds sold		4,252,623		3.90	%		41,279		383,377		5.31	%		5,021		4,086,777		2.54	%		26,062		5,648,347		5.32	%		75,689
Commercial paper		6,689		4.63	%		77		15,425		5.36	%		204		—		—			—		15,642		5.35	%		211
Investment securities		529,302		4.55	%		5,987		86,061		5.57	%		1,183		882,891		5.24	%		11,626		94,247		5.45	%		1,294
Loans:⁽¹⁾
Credit cards		21,148,252		10.35	%		543,989		21,841,166		10.55	%		568,042		19,275,733		10.40	%		503,756		18,581,153		10.72	%		502,049
Other consumer loans		375,354		9.89	%		9,232		95,625		6.56	%		1,546		614,597		10.47	%		16,170		92,372		4.95	%		1,152

Total loans		21,523,606		10.34	%		553,221		21,936,791		10.53	%		569,588		19,890,330		10.40	%		519,926		18,673,525		10.69	%		503,201
Other interest-earning assets		3,554,790		4.50	%		39,801		2,455,433		5.98	%		36,210		2,566,561		3.13	%		20,210		4,001,696		5.68	%		57,261

Total interest-earning assets		32,089,758		8.31	%		662,802		24,877,087		9.98	%		612,206		32,619,104		7.46	%		612,063		28,433,457		8.90	%		637,656
Allowance for loan losses		(796,214	)						(708,147	)						(831,552	)						(631,227	)
Other assets		2,809,875							2,654,833							2,882,551							2,235,756
Assets of discontinued operations		3,886,838							3,342,382							1,300,309							3,283,844

Total assets	$	37,990,257						$	30,166,155						$	35,970,412						$	33,321,830

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits⁽²⁾	$	20,305,060		5.20	%		262,353	$	11,489,345		5.02	%		142,347	$	20,578,953		5.00	%		258,808	$	16,317,534		5.15	%		211,824
Money market deposits		4,521,061		4.21	%		47,272		3,410,178		5.29	%		44,516		4,525,554		2.95	%		33,538		4,145,122		5.33	%		55,735
Other interest-bearing deposits		45,395		1.54	%		174		43,038		3.72	%		395		46,777		0.81	%		95		41,252		3.56	%		370

Total interest-bearing deposits		24,871,516		5.01	%		309,799		14,942,561		5.08	%		187,258		25,151,284		4.63	%		292,441		20,503,908		5.18	%		267,929
Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		8,723		4.15	%		90		3,940,310		5.39	%		52,334		5,469		3.27	%		45		1,790,960		5.66	%		25,572
Long-term borrowings		2,071,366		5.74	%		29,552		819,393		6.05	%		12,215		1,908,354		4.33	%		20,762		669,982		5.87	%		9,921

Total borrowings		2,080,089		5.73	%		29,642		4,759,703		5.50	%		64,549		1,913,823		4.33	%		20,807		2,460,942		5.72	%		35,493

Total interest-bearing liabilities		26,951,605		5.07	%		339,441		19,702,264		5.18	%		251,807		27,065,107		4.60	%		313,248		22,964,850		5.24	%		303,422
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity:
Liabilities of discontinued operations		2,956,482							2,579,000							919,685							2,515,251
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity		8,082,170							7,884,891							7,985,620							7,841,729

Total other liabilities and stockholders’ equity		11,038,652							10,463,891							8,905,305							10,356,980

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	37,990,257						$	30,166,155						$	35,970,412						$	33,321,830

Net interest income						$	323,361						$	360,399						$	298,815						$	334,234

Net interest margin⁽³⁾				4.05	%						5.88	%						3.64	%						4.66	%
Interest rate spread⁽⁴⁾				3.24	%						4.80	%						2.86	%						3.66	%


	For the Six Months Ended
	May 31, 2008							May 31, 2007
	Average Balance			Rate		Interest		Average Balance			Rate		Interest
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits in other banks	$	3,715,761		3.05	%	$	56,676	$	—		—		$	—
Federal Funds sold		4,169,247		3.23	%		67,341		3,044,790		5.32	%		80,710
Commercial paper		3,326		4.63	%		77		15,534		5.36	%		415
Investment securities		707,063		4.98	%		17,613		90,199		5.51	%		2,477
Loans:⁽¹⁾
Credit cards		20,206,876		10.37	%		1,047,745		20,193,248		10.63	%		1,070,091
Other consumer loans		495,629		10.25	%		25,402		93,980		5.76	%		2,698

Total loans		20,702,505		10.37	%		1,073,147		20,287,228		10.61	%		1,072,789
Other interest-earning assets		3,057,975		3.92	%		60,011		3,237,061		5.79	%		93,471

Total interest-earning assets		32,355,877		7.88	%		1,274,865		26,674,812		9.40	%		1,249,862
Allowance for loan losses		(813,979	)						(669,265	)
Other assets		2,846,410							2,442,993
Assets of discontinued operations		2,586,507							3,312,791

Total assets	$	36,974,815						$	31,761,331

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits⁽²⁾	$	20,442,755		5.10	%		521,161	$	13,929,968		5.10	%		354,171
Money market deposits		4,523,320		3.57	%		80,810		3,781,688		5.32	%		100,251
Other interest-bearing deposits		46,089		1.17	%		269		42,135		3.64	%		765

Total interest-bearing deposits		25,012,164		4.82	%		602,240		17,753,791		5.14	%		455,187
Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		7,087		3.81	%		135		2,853,825		5.47	%		77,906
Long-term borrowings		1,989,415		5.06	%		50,314		743,867		5.97	%		22,136

Total borrowings		1,996,502		5.05	%		50,449		3,597,692		5.58	%		100,042

Total interest-bearing liabilities		27,008,666		4.83	%		652,689		21,351,483		5.22	%		555,229
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity:
Liabilities of discontinued operations		1,932,518							2,546,776
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity		8,033,631							7,863,072

Total other liabilities and stockholders’ equity		9,966,149							10,409,848

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	36,974,815						$	31,761,331

Net interest income						$	622,176						$	694,633

Net interest margin⁽³⁾				3.85	%						5.22	%
Interest rate spread⁽⁴⁾				3.05	%						4.18	%


	For the Three Months Ended February 29, 2008 vs. February 28, 2007									For the Three Months Ended May 31, 2008 vs. May 31, 2007									For the Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 vs. May 31, 2007
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in net interest income due to changes in:
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits in other banks	$	22,437		$	—		$	22,437		$	34,239		$	—		$	34,239		$	56,676		$	—		$	56,676
Federal Funds sold		45,846			(9,588	)		36,258			(17,166	)		(32,461	)		(49,627	)		55,103			(68,472	)		(13,369	)
Commercial paper		(102	)		(25	)		(127	)		(106	)		(105	)		(211	)		(288	)		(50	)		(338	)
Investment securities		6,343			(1,539	)		4,804			10,677			(345	)		10,332			15,863			(727	)		15,136
Loans:
Credit cards		(14,998	)		(9,055	)		(24,053	)		67,376			(65,669	)		1,707			2,212			(24,558	)		(22,346	)
Other consumer loans		6,547			1,139			7,686			12,543			2,475			15,018			19,198			3,506			22,704

Total loans		(8,451	)		(7,916	)		(16,367	)		79,919			(63,194	)		16,725			21,410			(21,052	)		358
Other interest-earning assets		49,072			(45,481	)		3,591			(16,469	)		(20,582	)		(37,051	)		(4,903	)		(28,557	)		(33,460	)

Total interest income		115,145			(64,549	)		50,596			91,094			(116,687	)		(25,593	)		143,861			(118,858	)		25,003
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits		114,881			5,125			120,006			85,607			(38,623	)		46,984			167,044			(54	)		166,990
Money market deposits		47,208			(44,452	)		2,756			29,900			(52,097	)		(22,197	)		42,072			(61,513	)		(19,441	)
Other interest-bearing deposits		142			(363	)		(221	)		295			(570	)		(275	)		193			(689	)		(496	)

Total interest-bearing deposits		162,231			(39,690	)		122,541			115,802			(91,290	)		24,512			209,309			(62,256	)		147,053
Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		(42,471	)		(9,773	)		(52,244	)		(17,933	)		(7,594	)		(25,527	)		(59,600	)		(18,171	)		(77,771	)
Long-term borrowings		21,658			(4,321	)		17,337			27,631			(16,790	)		10,841			38,233			(10,055	)		28,178

Total borrowings		(20,813	)		(14,094	)		(34,907	)		9,698			(24,384	)		(14,686	)		(21,367	)		(28,226	)		(49,593	)

Total interest expense		141,418			(53,784	)		87,634			125,500			(115,674	)		9,826			187,942			(90,482	)		97,460

Net interest income	$	(26,273	)	$	(10,765	)	$	(37,038	)	$	(34,406	)	$	(1,013	)	$	(35,419	)	$	(44,081	)	$	(28,376	)	$	(72,457	)

Provision for loan losses is the expense related to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to absorb the estimated probable losses in the loan portfolio at each period end date. Factors that influence the provision for loan losses include the level and direction of loan delinquencies and charge-offs, changes in consumer spending and payment behaviors, bankruptcy trends, regulatory changes or new regulatory guidance, the seasoning of our loan portfolio, interest rate movements and their impact on consumer behavior, and changes in our loan portfolio, including the overall mix of accounts, products and loan balances within the portfolio. We also consider the credit quality of the loan portfolio in determining the allowance for loan losses. Credit quality at any time reflects, among other factors, our credit granting practices and effectiveness of collection efforts, the impact of general economic conditions on the consumer, and the seasoning of the loans.

For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, the provision for loan losses increased ~~$158.4~~$66.3 million, or ~~108%~~46%, compared with the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, primarily reflecting higher net charge-offs as a result of the deteriorating economic environment. Despite the decline in credit performance, the level of the allowance for

loan losses decreased $13.6 million during the three months ended May 31, 2008, due to lower owned loans as a result of securitization activity, offset in part by an increase in the reserve rate. In the three months ended May 31, 2007, we decreased the level of allowance for loan losses by $18.5 million, reflecting improved credit performance.

For the six months ended May 31, 2008, the provision for loan losses increased $224.7 million, or 77%, compared with the six months ended May 31, 2007, reflecting an increase in the level of allowance for loan losses and higher net charge-offs. In the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, we added ~~$100.5~~$86.8 million to the allowance for loan losses, reflecting loan growth and an increase in the loan loss reserve rate due to higher delinquencies which we believe is primarily ~~attribute~~attributable to the downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage ~~issues~~industry and a deteriorating economic environment. In the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, we decreased the level of allowance for loan losses by ~~$40.7~~$59.2 million, reflecting improved credit performance and slightly lower loan balances.

The following table provides a summary of the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended May 31,						For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			2008			2007			2008			2007
Balance at beginning of period	$	759,925		$	703,917		$	860,378		$	663,172		$	759,925		$	703,917
Additions:
Provision for loan losses		305,632			147,198			210,969			144,676			516,601			291,874
Deductions:
Charge-offs		(245,628	)		(229,124	)		(269,013	)		(204,384	)		(514,641	)		(433,509	)
Recoveries		40,449			41,183			44,441			41,237			84,890			82,419

Net charge-offs		(205,179	)		(187,941	)		(224,572	)		(163,147	)		(429,751	)		(351,090	)

Balance at end of period	$	860,378		$	663,174		$	846,775		$	644,701		$	846,775		$	644,701

The allowance for loan losses increased ~~$197.2~~$202.1 million, or ~~30%~~31%, at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. The higher level was attributable to rising delinquency and charge-off rates on credit card loan receivables, as well as higher ~~balance sheet~~ loan ~~receivables~~portfolio balances driven by growth in credit card loan receivables and other consumer loans. The factors impacting the changes in credit quality across these periods are discussed further in “—“–Net Charge-offs” and “—“–Delinquencies” below.

Our net charge-offs include the principal amount of losses ~~charged-off~~charged off less current period principal recoveries and exclude charged-off interest and fees, current period recoveries of interest and fees and fraud losses. Charged-off and recovered interest and fees are recorded in interest and loan fee income for loan receivables and in securitization income for securitized loans while fraud losses are recorded in other expense. Credit card loans are ~~charged-off~~charged off at the end of the month during which an account becomes 180 days contractually past due, except in the case of cardmember bankruptcies and probate accounts. Cardmember bankruptcies and probate accounts are ~~charged-off~~charged off at the end of the month 60 days following the receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death but not later than the 180-day contractual time frame. The net charge-off rate is calculated by dividing net charge-offs for the period by the average loan receivables for the period.

The following table presents amounts and rates of net charge-offs of loan receivables (dollars in thousands):

The net charge-off rate on our loan receivables increased 36102 basis points and 68 basis points for the three and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, respectively, as compared to the ~~three months ended February 28, 2007.~~respective prior year periods. The higher net charge-off rate in both periods was due to higher delinquencies beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007, reflecting the weakening economic environment, the downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage ~~issues~~industry and an increase in bankruptcy-related charge-offs.

Delinquencies are an indicator of credit quality at any point in time. Loan balances are considered delinquent when contractual payments on the loan become 30 days past due.

The following table presents the amounts and delinquency rates of loan receivables over 30 days delinquent, loans receivables over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest, regardless of delinquency (dollars in thousands):


	February 29, 2008				November 30, 2007				May 31, 2008				November 30, 2007
	$		%		$		%		$		%		$		%
Loans over 30 days delinquent	$	763,511	3.63	%	$	678,963	3.26	%	$	725,741	3.54	%	$	678,963	3.26	%
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest	$	335,246	1.59	%	$	271,227	1.30	%	$	322,479	1.57	%	$	271,227	1.30	%
Loans not accruing interest	$	109,746	0.52	%	$	102,286	0.49	%	$	114,442	0.56	%	$	102,286	0.49	%

The delinquency rates of loans over 30 days delinquent and loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest increased 3728 basis points and 2927 basis points, respectively, at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to November 30, 2007. This increase in both measures reflected a weaker economic environment and the downturns in the U.S. housing markets and mortgage ~~issues.~~industry.

Loan receivables are placed on non-accrual status upon receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death of a cardmember and as part of certain collection management processes. Loan receivables not accruing interest at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 increased 37 basis points to ~~0.52%~~0.56%, as compared to November 30, 2007, as a result of an increase in bankruptcy notifications.

The ~~principal component of other income is securitization income. The~~ following table presents the components of other income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Three Months Ended May 31,					2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Six Months Ended May 31,					2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007		$			%		2008			2007		$			%		2008			2007		$			%
Securitization income	$	713,497	$	508,300	$	205,197		40	%	$	628,031		$	584,566	$	43,465		7	%	$	1,341,528		$	1,092,866	$	248,662		23	%
Loan fee income		88,258		89,041		(783	)	(1	%)		53,839			70,303		(16,464	)	(23	%)		142,097			159,344		(17,247	)	(11	%)
Discount and interchange revenue⁽¹⁾		51,896		79,581		(27,685	)	(35	%)		65,523			65,964		(441	)	(1	%)		117,419			145,545		(28,126	)	(19	%)
Insurance		47,769		43,963		3,806		9	%		47,186			40,468		6,718		17	%		94,955			84,431		10,524		12	%
Merchant fees		18,844		25,326		(6,482	)	(26	%)		17,849			23,853		(6,004	)	(25	%)		36,693			49,179		(12,486	)	(25	%)
Transaction processing revenue		25,954		24,510		1,444		6	%		30,405			25,187		5,218		21	%		56,359			49,697		6,662		13	%
Loss on investments											(31,280	)		—		(31,280	)	NM			(32,464	)		—		(32,464	)	NM
Other income		29,326		19,628		9,698		49	%		33,339			19,445		13,894		71	%		63,849			39,073		24,776		63	%

Total other income	$	975,544	$	790,349	$	185,195		23	%	$	844,892		$	829,786	$	15,106		2	%	$	1,820,436		$	1,620,135	$	200,301		12	%

Total other income increased ~~$185.2~~$15.1 million, or ~~23%~~2%, for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, primarily ~~related~~due to ~~higher~~an increase in securitization ~~income and other~~ income, partially offset by losses on investments and a decline in loan fee income. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, total other income increased $200.3 million, or 12%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007, largely because of an increase in securitization income, partially offset by losses on investments, lower discount and interchange ~~revenue.~~revenue and a decrease in loan fee income.

For securitization transactions completed on or after November 3, 2004, in accordance with governing securitization documents, we allocate portions of our discount and interchange revenue to new securitization transactions. Within other income, this change to allocating discount and interchange revenue has the effect of decreasing discount and interchange revenue and increasing securitization income. The amount of discount and interchange revenue allocated to securitization transactions has increased since this change was made in 2004 and is expected to continue increasing as new transactions which include such allocations are completed and securitizations transactions that did not receive allocations mature. For the three and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, approximately ~~79%~~83% and 81%, respectively, of total securitized loans were allocated discount and interchange revenue compared to ~~57% in~~64% and 61% for the three and six months ended ~~February 28, 2007.~~

To broaden merchant acceptance of Discover Network cards, we began outsourcing our acquisition and servicing of small and mid-sized merchants to merchant acquiring organizations in late 2006. In addition, we are selling small and mid-size merchant portfolios to third-party acquirers to facilitate integrated servicing and reduce costs. As the outsourcing continues, merchant discount will be replaced by acquirer interchange and assessments, which will reduce the percentage of income per transaction and, over time, operating expenses as we no longer incur costs to acquire and service small and mid-sized merchants. The lower cost per transaction is expected to be offset by increased volume due to broader acceptance. Any gains on the sale of merchant acquiring portfolios will be reflected in other income as earned.May 31, 2007, respectively.

Securitization income is a significant source of our income and is derived through asset securitizations and continued servicing of a portion of the credit card receivables we originated. The issuance of asset-backed securities to investors has the effect of removing the owned loan receivables from the consolidated statements of financial condition. Also, portions of interest income, provision for loan losses and certain components of other income related to the securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued are no longer reported in our statements of income; however, they remain significant factors in determining securitization income we receive on our retained beneficial interest in those transactions. Investors in securitizations are allocated the cash flows derived from interest and loan fee revenue earned on securitized loans. In addition, for securitization transactions completed on or after November 3, 2004, in accordance with governing securitization documents, we allocate portions of our discount and interchange revenue to new securitization transactions. These cash flows are used to pay the investors in the transactions a contractual fixed or floating rate of return on their investment, to reimburse investors for losses of principal resulting from charged-off loans, net of recoveries, and to pay us a contractual fee for servicing the securitized loans. Any excess cash flows remaining are paid to us. Both servicing fees and excess spread are recorded in securitization income. Securitization income also includes the net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable and certain other retained interests, reflecting adjustments to the fair values of the retained interests that result from changes in the level of securitized loans and assumptions used to value the retained interests.

Securitization income is significantly influenced by the level of average securitized loans. For both the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 and ~~February 28,~~ 2007, the average securitized loans were ~~$27.3~~$27.6 billion. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, the average securitized loans were $27.5 billion and ~~$25.0~~$26.3 billion, respectively. The ~~first quarter of~~higher average securitized loans for the six months ended May 31, 2008 reflected a higher beginning level of securitized loans, which was offset in part by a higher level of deal maturities. In addition, lower average securitized loans in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007 reflected the timing of new securitization transactions later in the ~~quarter rather than throughout the~~ period.

The table below presents the components of securitization income (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Three Months Ended May 31,						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Six Months Ended May 31,						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			$			%		2008			2007			$			%		2008			2007			$			%
Excess spread	$	505,033		$	385,361		$	119,672		31%		$	539,297		$	415,840		$	123,457		30	%	$	1,044,330		$	801,201		$	243,129		30	%
Servicing fees on securitized loans		138,263			126,055			12,208		10%			138,393			137,441			952		1	%		276,656			263,496			13,160		5	%
Net revaluation of retained interests(1)		74,997			1,421			73,576		NM			(44,473	)		36,354			(80,827	)	NM			30,524			37,775			(7,251	)	(19	%)
Other (principally transaction costs)		(4,796	)		(4,537	)		(259	)	(6%	)		(5,186	)		(5,069	)		(117	)	(2	%)		(9,982	)		(9,606	)		(376	)	(4	%)

Securitization income	$	713,497		$	508,300		$	205,197		40%		$	628,031		$	584,566		$	43,465		7	%	$	1,341,528		$	1,092,866		$	248,662		23	%

For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, securitization income increased ~~$205.2~~$43.5 million, or ~~40%~~7%, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. The increase reflects higher excess spread on securitized loans, ~~a higher~~offset in part by lower net revaluation of retained interests. For the ~~interest-only strip receivable and~~six months ended May 31, 2008, securitization income increased $248.7 million, or 23%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 reflecting higher ~~servicing fees~~excess spread on securitized loans.

Excess ~~spread~~spread.. The following table provides the components of excess spread (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Three Months Ended May 31,						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Six Months Ended May 31,						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007			$			%		2008			2007			$			%		2008			2007			$			%
Interest income on securitized loans	$	989,813		$	870,359		$	119,454		14	%	$	960,634		$	964,226		$	(3,592	)	0	%	$	1,950,447		$	1,834,586		$	115,861		6	%
Interest paid to investors in asset-backed securities		(329,512	)		(341,816	)		12,304		4	%		(237,381	)		(390,419	)		153,038		39	%		(566,893	)		(732,237	)		165,344		23	%

Net interest income		660,301			528,543			131,758		25	%		723,253			573,807			149,446		26	%		1,383,554			1,102,349			281,205		26	%
Other fee revenue on securitized loans		304,431			241,752			62,679		26	%		325,005			279,047			45,958		16	%		629,436			520,799			108,637		21	%
Net charge-offs on securitized loans		(321,436	)		(258,879	)		(62,557	)	(24	%)		(370,568	)		(299,573	)		(70,995	)	(24	%)		(692,004	)		(558,451	)		(133,553	)	(24	%)

Net revenues on securitized loans		643,296			511,416			131,880		26	%		677,690			553,281			124,409		22	%		1,320,986			1,064,697			256,289		24	%
Servicing fees on securitized loans		(138,263	)		(126,055	)		(12,208	)	(10	%)	��	(138,393	)		(137,441	)		(952	)	(1	%)		(276,656	)		(263,496	)		(13,160	)	(5	%)

Excess spread	$	505,033		$	385,361		$	119,672		31	%	$	539,297		$	415,840		$	123,457		30	%	$	1,044,330		$	801,201		$	243,129		30	%

For the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, excess spread on securitized loans increased ~~$119.7~~$123.5 million, or ~~31%~~30%, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. For the six months ended May 31, 2008, excess spread on securitized loans increased $243.1 million, or 30%, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007. The increase in both periods was attributable to higher net interest income and higher other fee revenue on securitized loans, offset in part by higher net charge-offs. The increase in net interest income related largely to a ~~higher level of average securitized loans as well as a higher yield on securitized receivables. The~~ decrease in interest paid to investors ~~reflected~~reflective of the impact of a lower average LIBOR on floating rate investor interests, offset in part by wider spreads paid to investors on newer ~~transactions and a higher level of average securitized loans.~~transactions. Higher other fee revenue was attributable to the higher level of outstanding securitized loans receiving discount and interchange revenue. The higher net charge-offs reflected a higher rate of charge-offs on securitized loans ~~and~~as a result of the weakening economic environment. The increase in excess spread in the six month period was also attributable to the higher level of average securitized loans.

~~Servicing fees on securitized loans~~. We are paid a servicing fee from the cash flows generated by the securitized loans. These cash flows include interest income and loan fee income as well as discount and interchange revenue for certain securitized loans. For the three months ended February 29, 2008, servicing fees increased $12.2 million, or 10%, as compared to the three months ended February 28, 2007. The increase was due to a higher level of average securitized loans as compared to the prior period.

Net revaluation of retained ~~interests~~interests.. The components of net revaluation of retained interests are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended					2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)		For the Three Months Ended May 31,						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)			For the Six Months Ended May 31,						2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007			$		2008			2007			$			2008			2007			$
Initial gain on new securitization transactions(1)	$	36,755	$	23,789		$	12,966	$	25,332		$	56,914			$(31,582	)	$	62,087		$	80,703		$ (18,616	)
Revaluation of retained interests		38,242		(22,368	)		60,610		(69,805	)		(20,560	)		(49,245	)		(31,563	)		(42,928	)	11,365

Net revaluation of retained interests	$	74,997	$	1,421		$	73,576	$	(44,473	)	$	36,354		$	(80,827	)	$	30,524		$	37,775		$ (7,251	)

The net revaluation of retained interests includes the initial gain on securitized loan receivables and changes in the fair value of retained interests, ~~principally~~including the interest-only strip ~~receivable.~~receivable and the cash collateral accounts provided as credit enhancement to certain securitization transactions. Gains are not recorded on securitized loan receivables against which certificated beneficial interests have been retained by us, and such certificated retained beneficial interests are classified as investment securities available-for-sale and reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable represents changes in the estimated present value of certain components of excess spread on the securitized loans to be earned in the future. Changes in the maturity profile and the estimate of performance measures of the securitized loans, such as

interest yield and charge-offs, as well as changes in the interest rate environment, can affect future excess spread projections and, accordingly, the net revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable. Changes in the interest rate environment can also affect the estimated present value of future interest and principal cash flows on the cash collateral accounts which is reflected in net revaluation of retained interests.

The net revaluation of retained interests for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 ~~increased $73.6~~decreased $80.8 million, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. The ~~increase~~decrease reflected ~~higher~~lower initial gains on new securitization transactions related to ~~$2.6~~$1.9 billion in new securitization transactions for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to ~~$1.6~~$3.7 billion in new securitization transactions for the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007. The ~~positive~~unfavorable net revaluation of ~~retained interests~~the interest-only strip receivable in the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 related to ~~higher~~lower projected excess spread, as compared to February 29, 2008, offset in part by net gain amortization related to the maturity of securitization transactions. The lower projected excess spread reflected higher projected charge-offs and a lower projected net interest spread. The three months ended May 31, 2008 also reflected an unfavorable net revaluation of cash collateral accounts reflective of higher long-term interest rate projections. The unfavorable net revaluation of retained interests in the comparable prior year period was primarily due to net gain amortization related to the maturity of securitization transactions.

The net revaluation of retained interests for the six months ended May 31, 2008 decreased $7.3 million, as compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007. The decrease reflected lower initial gains on new securitization transactions related to $4.4 billion in new securitization transactions for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to $5.3 billion in new securitization transactions for the six months ended May 31, 2007. This was offset in part by a lower unfavorable net revaluation of retained interests in the six months ended May 31, 2008 related to net gain amortization associated with the maturity of securitization transactions, offset in part by higher projected excess spread. The higher projected excess spread reflected the decrease in the absolute interest rate environment, as compared to that assumed at November 30, 2007, offset in part by lower projected yield and higher projected charge-offs. The ~~negative~~six months ended May 31, 2008 also reflected an unfavorable net revaluation of cash collateral accounts due to higher long-term interest rate projections. The unfavorable net revaluation of retained interests in the comparable period in prior year was primarily due to net gain amortization related to the maturity of securitization transactions.

Loan fee income consists primarily of fees on credit card loans and includes late, overlimit, balance transfer, cash advance and other miscellaneous fees. Loan fee income ~~was relatively flat~~ decreased $16.5 million, or 23%, and $17.2 million, or 11%,

for the three and six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to May 31, 2007, respectively, as a result of deferrals of balance transfer fees in 2008 historically accounted for in loan fee income which will be accreted into interest income over the ~~three months ended February 28, 2007.~~life of the loan.

Discount and interchange revenue includes discount revenue and acquirer interchange net of interchange paid to third-party issuers in the United States. We earn discount revenue from fees charged to merchants with whom we have entered into card acceptance agreements for processing cardholder purchase transactions and acquirer interchange revenue from merchant acquirers on all Discover Network card transactions made by cardholders at merchants with whom merchant acquirers have entered into card acceptance agreements for processing cardholder purchase transactions. We incur an interchange cost to card issuing entities that have entered into contractual arrangements to issue cards on the Discover Network. This cost is contractually established and is based on the card issuing organizations’ transaction volume and is reported as a reduction to discount and interchange revenue. We offer our cardmembers various reward programs, including the Cashback Bonus reward program, pursuant to which we pay certain cardmembers a percentage of their purchase amounts based on the type and volume of the cardmember’s purchases. Reward costs are recorded as a reduction to discount and interchange revenue. For securitization transactions completed on or after November 3, 2004, in accordance with governing securitization documents, we allocate portions of discount and interchange revenue to new securitization transactions, which results in a decrease in discount and interchange revenue and an increase in securitization income. However, cardmember rewards costs associated with the securitized loans are not allocated to investor interests, and as such, do not impact securitization income.

Discount and interchange revenue ~~decreased $27.7 million, or 35%,~~ for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 aswas relatively flat when compared to ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, ~~due~~as lower rewards costs related to revised forfeiture assumptions, largely offset lower discount and interchange revenue related to higher allocations to securitized loans which have the effect of reclassifying discount and interchange revenue to securitization ~~income~~income. Discount and interchange revenue decreased $28.1 million, or 19%, for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to May 31, 2007, due to higher allocations to securitized loans, partially offset by ~~an increase in~~lower cardmember rewards costs related to revised forfeiture assumptions and higher discount and interchange revenue ~~earned~~ related to ~~higher~~increased sales volume. The increase in allocations to securitized loans was due to a higher level of outstanding securitized loans receiving such allocations in the current year than in 2007.

We earn revenue primarily related to fees received for marketing credit-related ancillary products including insurance, debt deferment/debt cancellation contracts and credit protection services to cardmembers. The amount of revenue recorded is based on the terms of the insurance policies and contracts with third-party providers. We do not retain any significant underwriting loss exposure. We recognize this income over the policy or contract period as earned. Insurance income increased $3.8 million, or 9%, forIn the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, ~~as compared~~we concluded there had been an other-than-temporary impairment in our investment in the asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC which invested in mortgage-backed securities. This impairment resulted in a $31.3 million write-down of the notes to $77.4 million. We expect this investment may be restructured by the ~~three months ended February 28, 2007, related to higher credit protection and debt deferment revenue.~~

Merchant fees consist primarily of fees charged to merchants for various services including manual authorization of transactions and delivery of hardcopy statements. Merchant fees decreased $6.5 million, or 26%,issuer later in 2008 which could result in further impairment. In comparison, there were no losses on investment securities for the three and six months ended February 29, 2008 as compared to the three months ended February 28, 2007, due to increased outsourcing to merchant acquirers. As merchant acquiring portfolios are sold to third-party merchant acquirers, this revenue will decrease along with associated costs.

Transaction processing revenues include switch fees charged to financial institutions for accessing the PULSE Network to process transactions and various participation and membership fees. Switch fees are charged on a per transaction basis. Transaction processing revenue increased $1.4 million, or 6%, for the three months ended February 29, 2008 as compared to the three months ended February 28, 2007, related to increased volume of transactions processed on the network, partially offset by higher marketing and pricing incentives.May 31, 2007.

Other income includes revenues on various fee-based products, revenues from the referral of declined applications to certain third-party issuers on the Discover Network, unrealized gains and losses related to derivative contracts, gains on sales of mortgage loans ~~investment gains and losses,~~ and other miscellaneous revenue items. Other income increased ~~$9.7~~$13.9 million, or ~~49%~~71%, primarily due to $10.6 million in lower unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements and a $6.2 million increase in gains on the sales of merchant portfolios. Other income increased $24.8 million, or 63%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, ~~related~~primarily due to $3$15.0 million in ~~revenue related to~~lower unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements and a ~~one-time contractual payment, $3~~$10.2 million increase in gains on the sale of merchant ~~portfolios and $2 million in unrealized gains on derivative transactions.~~portfolios.

The following table represents the components of other expense for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Three Months Ended May 31,				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)					For the Six Months Ended May 31,				2008 vs. 2007 increase (decrease)
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007		$			%		2008		2007		$			%		2008		2007		$			%
Employee compensation and benefits	$	217,370	$	215,167	$	2,203		1	%	$	218,290	$	215,447	$	2,843		1	%	$	435,660	$	430,614	$	5,046		1	%
Marketing and business development		141,553		134,542		7,011		5	%		132,038		131,959		79		0	%		273,591		266,501		7,090		3	%
Information processing and communications		78,276		78,844		(568	)	(1	%)		79,449		82,396		(2,947	)	(4	%)		157,725		161,240		(3,515	)	(2	%)
Professional fees		73,672		76,065		(2,393	)	(3	%)		81,392		102,853		(21,461	)	(21	%)		155,064		178,918		(23,854	)	(13	%)
Premises and equipment		19,641		19,575		66		0	%		19,803		20,557		(754	)	(4	%)		39,444		40,132		(688	)	(2	%)
Other expense		71,831		67,648		4,183		6	%		75,853		70,546		5,307		8	%		147,684		138,194		9,490		7	%

Total other expense	$	602,343	$	591,841	$	10,502		2	%	$	606,825	$	623,758	$	(16,933	)	(3	%)	$	1,209,168	$	1,215,599	$	(6,431	)	(1	%)

Total other expense ~~increased $10.5~~decreased $16.9 million, or 2%3%, for the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, primarily related to ~~higher marketing~~lower legal fees incurred related to the Visa and ~~business development~~MasterCard litigation and ~~other expenses. Marketing and business development increased $7.0 million, or 5%, for~~lower consulting fees during the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2007, partially offset by higher fraud expenses in the current period.

Total other expense decreased $6.4 million, or 1%, for the six months ended May 31, 2008, as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February 28,~~May 31, 2007, primarily related to ~~increased~~lower legal fees incurred related to the Visa and MasterCard litigation and lower consulting fees during the six months ended May 31, 2007, partially offset by higher television advertising and ~~account acquisition spending. Other expense increased $4.2 million, or 6%, for the three months ended February 29, 2008 as compared to the three months ended February 28, 2007, as a result of~~ higher fraud ~~expenses.~~expenses in the current period.

The following table reconciles our effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate:


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Three Months Ended May 31,				For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	February 29, 2008		February 28, 2007		2008		2007		2008		2007
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits	3.2		1.8		3.1		1.8		3.1		1.8
Other	0.7		0.1		0.1		(0.1	)	0.5		—

Effective income tax rate	38.9	%	36.9	%	38.2	%	36.7	%	38.6	%	36.8	%

We seek to maintain liquidity, capital and funding policies that ensure our credit ratings and bank capitalization levels are sufficient to provide cost effective access to debt and deposit markets thus providing sufficient liquidity to fund our business. Our liquidity and funding risk management policies are designed to mitigate the risk that we may be unable to access adequate financing to service our financial obligations when they come due. Liquidity risk is addressed through various funding criteria and targets that guide our access to the long-term and short-term debt capital markets, the maturity profile of our liabilities, the diversity of our funding sources and investor base, as well as the level of our liquidity reserve as part of a contingency funding plan. ~~We attempt to ensure that the maturity of our liabilities equals or exceeds the expected holding period of the assets being financed.~~

Liquidity risk is assessed by several measures including the liquidity position, which measures funding in various maturity tranches. The maturities of the various funding instruments are reviewed during the funding planning and execution process to ensure the maturities are staggered. The mix of funding sources and the composition of our investor base are also reviewed during the funding process to ensure appropriate diversification. Funding sources include externally derived short-term borrowings, asset-backed commercial paper conduit financing, long-term asset-backed securitizations, bank deposits and bank notes.

We monitor and review liquidity and capital management policies and execute strategies to maintain prudent levels of liquidity and capital. Our senior management reviews financial performance relative to these policies, monitors the availability of alternative financing sources, evaluates liquidity risk and capital adequacy, and assesses the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities.

Management has implemented liquidity and capital management policies which seek to provide us with adequate access to and supply of funding through the business cycle. Accordingly, Discover Bank has maintained an investment grade rating and Discover Financial Services received an investment grade rating following the Distribution. Discover Bank has maintained its BBB rating from S&P and has been assigned a Baa2 deposit and Baa2 senior unsecured rating from Moody’s and a BBB rating from Fitch. Discover Financial Services has been assigned a BBB- long-term rating from S&P, a Baa3 senior unsecured rating from Moody’s and a BBB long-term rating from Fitch.

Our Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) is designed to withstand a Discover stress event characterized by limited access to the asset-backed securitization and ~~certificate of~~ deposit ~~markets.~~markets over a defined period. Our CFP model incorporates a wide range of potential cash outflows during a liquidity stress event, including, but not limited to: (i) repayment of all debt maturing within an assumed stress period; (ii) expected funding requirements from receivable growth and/or volatility; and (iii) customer cash withdrawals from interest-bearing deposits. If we are unable to continue to securitize our credit card receivables at acceptable pricing levels, or at all, including by reason of the early amortization of any of our securitization transactions, we would seek to liquidate ~~investment securities,~~investments, increase

bank deposits and use alternative funding sources (such as Federal Reserve Bank sources, Federal Funds, bank notes and unsecured debt) to fund increases in loan receivables and meet our other liquidity needs.

During the first ~~quarter~~half of 2008, the ongoing disruptions in the debt and asset-backed capital markets caused credit spreads to widen materially and reduced the availability of new issuance in some funding markets. As a result, we retained a portion of the subordinated notes we issued during the period as investment securities available-for-sale. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, our contingent sources included approximately ~~$8.3~~$8.4 billion in our liquidity reserve (primarily invested in Federal Funds sold and bank deposits), ~~$0.9~~$1.7 billion of unutilized commitments from third-party commercial paper asset-backed conduits for securitization funding, and $2.5 billion of unsecured committed credit. In addition, we had AAA-rated note issuance capacity of ~~$5.1~~$4.5 billion in the Discover Card Execution Note Trust, subject to market availability.

Our consolidated statement of financial condition at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 consisted primarily of credit card loan receivables, the balance of which fluctuates from time to time due to trends in credit card spending and payments, as well as the issuance of new securitization transactions and maturities of existing securitization transactions. ~~Our credit card loan receivables provide us with flexibility in financing~~For the three and ~~managing our business, as the market for financing credit card loan receivables is generally large~~six months ended May 31, 2008, we executed $1.9 billion and ~~active.~~$3.5 billion of public securitization transactions, respectively.

Equity Capital Management. ~~Our senior management~~Management views equity capital as an important source of financial strength. We determine the level of capital necessary to support our business based on our managed credit card loan receivables, goodwill and other intangible assets, taking into account, among other things, regulatory requirements, rating agency guidelines and internally managed requirements to sustain growth.

Under regulatory capital requirements adopted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and other bank regulatory agencies, FDIC-insured financial institutions must maintain minimum levels of capital that are dependent upon the risk of the financial institutions assets, specifically (a) 3% to 5% of Tier 1 capital, as

defined, to average assets (“leverage ratio”), (b) 4% to 6% of Tier 1 capital, as defined, to risk-weighted assets (“Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio”) and (c) 8% to 10% of total capital, as defined, to risk-weighted assets (“total risk-weighted capital ratio”). At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, the leverage ratio, Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio and total risk-weighted capital ratio of Discover Bank as well as our other FDIC-insured financial institution, Bank of New Castle, exceeded these regulatory minimums.

Dividend Policy.Although we intend to reinvest a substantial portion of our earnings in our business, we intend to continue to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock, subject to the approval of our Board of Directors. The declaration and payment of dividends, as well as the amount thereof, are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will declare and pay any dividends. In addition, as a result of applicable banking regulations and provisions that may be contained in our borrowing agreements or the borrowing agreements of our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders may further be limited.

Stock Repurchase Program.On December 3, 2007, Discover Financial Services announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of Discover Financial Services’ outstanding stock under a new share repurchase program. This share repurchase program expires on November 30, 2010, and may be terminated at any time. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, we had not repurchased any stock under this program.

Special Dividend.On June 19, 2007, we declared a special dividend to Morgan Stanley. Pursuant to the special dividend, upon resolution of our outstanding litigation with Visa U.S.A., Inc. and MasterCard ~~Worldwide,~~Inc., after expenses, ~~incurred by us in connection with such litigation,~~ we are required to pay Morgan Stanley (1) the first $700 million of value of cash or non-cash proceeds (increased at the rate of 6% per annum until paid in full)

~~(the~~ (the “minimum proceeds”) and (2) 50% of any proceeds in excess of $1.5 billion, subject to certain limitations and a maximum potential payment to Morgan Stanley of $1.5 billion. All payments by us to Morgan Stanley will be net of taxes payable by us with respect to such proceeds. If, in connection with or following a change in control of our company, the litigation is settled for an amount less than minimum proceeds, we are required to pay Morgan Stanley an amount equal to the minimum proceeds. As a result of our agreement to pay the value of non-cash proceeds, we may be required to pay amounts to Morgan Stanley in excess of cash received in connection with the litigation. The value of non-cash proceeds will be determined by an independent third party.

Securitization Financing. We generate a significant portion of our funding through the securitization of credit card loan receivables utilizing non-consolidated securitization trusts. Securitized loans against which beneficial interests have been issued to third parties are accounted for as sold and are removed from the consolidated statements of financial condition. Certain securitized loans against which certificated beneficial interests have been retained by us result in the removal of credit card loan receivables from the consolidated statements of financial condition and are re-characterized as investment securities. We have historically securitized between approximately 50% and 60% of our managed credit card loan receivables.

We utilize both the term securitization market as well as the privately placed asset-backed commercial paper conduit financing market. Outstanding term financing and asset-backed commercial paper conduit financing at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 were ~~$21.3~~$22.6 billion and ~~$4.8~~$4.4 billion, ~~respectively.~~respectively, with the $4.4 billion being net of $0.4 billion funded during May for repayment in June.

The following table summarizes expected maturities of the investors’ interests in securitizations at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

We access the term asset securitization market through the Discover Card Master Trust I and, beginning July 26, 2007, the Discover Card Execution Note Trust. Through the Discover Card Master Trust I, we have been using a structure utilizing Class A, triple-A rated certificates and Class B, single-A rated certificates held by third parties, with credit enhancement provided by the subordinated Class B certificates and a cash collateral account. The Discover Card Execution Note Trust includes three classes of securities sold to investors, the most senior class generally receiving a triple-A rating. In this structure, in order to issue senior, higher rated, classes of notes, it is necessary to obtain the appropriate amount of credit enhancement, generally through the issuance of junior, lower rated classes of notes.

At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, cash collateral accounts underlying the securitization transactions of Discover Card Master Trust I had a balance of ~~$1.7~~$1.6 billion, of which we financed ~~$1.5~~$1.4 billion (reflected in amounts due from asset securitization in the consolidated statements of financial condition). The rights to repayment of a portion of the cash collateral account loans have been sold to a special purpose subsidiary, DRFC Funding LLC, as part of a secured financing and are not expected to be available to creditors of DFS. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, ~~$0.9~~$0.8 billion is owed related to this secured financing.

The following table summarizes estimated maturities of the cash collateral accounts at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):


	Total		Less Than One Year		One Year Through Three Years		Four Years Through Five Years		After Five Years
Estimated maturities of cash collateral accounts	$	1,373,131	$	386,025	$	713,158	$	189,474	$	84,474

The securitization structures include certain features designed to protect investors that could result in earlier-than-expected amortization of the transactions, accelerating the need for alternative funding. The primary feature relates to the availability and adequacy of cash flows in the securitized pool of receivables to meet contractual requirements (“economic early amortization”). In the event of an economic early amortization (which would occur if the excess spread falls below 0% for a contractually specified period, generally a three-month average), the receivables that otherwise would have been subsequently purchased by the trust from us would instead continue to be recognized on our statement of financial condition since the cash flows generated in the trust would instead be used to repay investors in the asset-backed securities. As of ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, no economic early amortization events have occurred. The table below provides information concerning investor interest and related excess spreads at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):


	Investor Interest		# of Series Outstanding	3-Month Rolling Average Excess Spread		Investor Interest		# of Series Outstanding	3-Month Rolling Average Excess Spread
Interchange series⁽¹⁾	$	16,543,165	19	8.52	%	$	16,064,217	18	8.80	%
Non-interchange series		4,654,718	5	5.41	%		3,982,738	5	5.39	%

Discover Card Master Trust I		21,197,883	24	5.41	%		20,046,955	23	5.39	%
Discover Card Execution Note Trust⁽¹⁾		4,900,000	11	8.11	%		6,950,000	16	8.08	%

Total investor interest	$	26,097,883	35			$	26,996,955	39

~~Deposits~~Deposits.. We utilize deposits to diversify funding sources and to reduce our reliance on short-term credit-sensitive funding sources, thus enhancing our liquidity position. We obtain our deposits through various channels: direct retail certificates of deposit and money market accounts, retail and institutional brokerage arrangements and money market accounts, under which we receive funds swept through external third-parties. Direct consumer retail deposits are marketed to and received from individual customers, without the use of a third-party intermediary, and are an important, stable funding source that typically reacts more slowly to interest rate changes than other deposits. Brokered deposits are deposits placed to consumers through registered brokers.

Our certificates of deposits have maturities ranging from one month to fifteen years, having a weighted average maturity of 2022 months at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008. Total interest-bearing deposits at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008 were ~~$24.9~~$24.7 billion, the remaining maturities of which are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):

~~Short-Term Borrowings~~~~. Short-term borrowings consist of overnight Federal Funds purchased, the balance of which was $250 million at February 29, 2008.~~

Long-Term Borrowings and Bank ~~Notes~~Notes.. On June 12, 2007, we received proceeds on the issuance of $800 million par value of unsecured debt to external third parties. The financing is comprised of $400 million having a

three-year maturity with a floating coupon and $400 million with a ten-year maturity with a fixed coupon. The transaction provided additional liquidity to us to support funding requirements of our subsidiaries.

At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, we had $250 million par value in bank notes outstanding which mature in February 2009. We may issue additional bank notes under our Global Bank Note Program given that certain credit criteria are met.

Secured Committed Credit Facilities.The maintenance of revolving committed credit agreements serves to further diversify our funding sources. In connection with our asset securitization program, we have access to committed undrawn funding capacity through third-party bank-sponsored securitization conduits to support credit card loan receivables funding requirements. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, these conduits totaled ~~$5.75~~$6.5 billion, of which ~~$0.9~~$1.7 billion was unused. ~~These~~The original commitments of these facilities ~~begin at~~range from 364-day renewable agreements ~~and extend~~ to ~~2.5 year~~multi-year extendable commitments.

Unsecured Committed Credit Facilities.As of ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, our unsecured committed credit facility of $2.5 billion had a remaining life of ~~51-months.~~48-months. This facility serves to diversify our funding sources and enhance our liquidity. This facility became effective at the time of the Distribution, is provided by a group of major global banks, and is available to both Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank. We anticipate that the facility will support general liquidity needs and may be drawn to meet short-term funding needs from time to time. At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, we had ~~not drawn down any of~~no outstanding balances due under the ~~outstanding credit.~~facility.

Federal Reserve.Discover Bank may access the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s discount window or participate in the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility (“TAF”), if additional liquidity needs arise. In December 2007, the Federal Reserve announced the establishment of a temporary TAF. All depository institutions that are judged to be in generally sound financial condition by their local Reserve Bank and that are eligible to borrow under the primary credit discount window program are eligible to participate in TAF auctions.

See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Current Funding Sources—Securitization Financing.”

Guarantees are contracts or indemnification agreements that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying asset, liability, equity security of a guaranteed party, rate or index. Our guarantees relate to certain representations and warranties made with regard to securitized loans, transactions processed through the Discover Network and ~~cardmember-related services provided to U.K. cardmembers.~~indemnifications made in conjunction with the sale of the Goldfish business. Also included in guarantees are contracts that contingently require the guarantor to make payments to the guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. ~~At February 29, 2008, we had not recorded any such contingent liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition related to these transactions.~~ See Note 9:10: Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the consolidated and combined financial statements for further discussion regarding our guarantees.

In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. Contractual obligations at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, which include deposits, long-term borrowings and operating and capital lease obligations, were ~~$27.5~~$27.2 billion. For a description of our contractual obligations as of November 30, 2007, see our annual report on Form 10-K from the fiscal year ending November 30, 2007 under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments.”

We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on December 1, 2007 at which date we had approximately $283.8 million of tax liabilities, including interest and penalties, related to uncertain tax positions. Because of the high

degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to estimate the years in which settlement will occur with the respective taxing authorities.

At ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, we extended credit for consumer and commercial loans of approximately ~~$259~~$215 billion. Such commitments arise primarily from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards, provided there is no violation of conditions established in the related agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which we can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we guarantee payment on behalf of subsidiaries relating to contractual obligations with external parties. The activities of the subsidiaries covered by these guarantees, if any, are included in our consolidated and combined financial statements.

Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one or more market prices, rates, indices, correlations or other market factors will result in losses for a position or portfolio. We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates.

Interest Rate Risk. Changes in interest rates impact interest-earning assets, principally credit card loan receivables, as well as excess spread received in connection with the securitized loan receivables against which beneficial interests have been issued. Changes in interest rates also impact interest sensitive liabilities that finance these assets, including asset-backed securitizations, short-term and long-term borrowings and deposits.

Our interest rate risk management policies are designed to reduce the potential volatility of earnings that may arise from changes in interest rates by having a financing portfolio that reflects the existing repricing schedules of credit card loan receivables as well as our right, with notice to cardmembers, to reprice certain fixed or floating rate credit card loan receivables to a new interest rate in the future. To the extent that asset and related financing repricing characteristics of a particular portfolio are not matched effectively, we may utilize interest rate derivative contracts, such as swap agreements, to achieve our objectives. Interest rate swap agreements effectively convert the underlying asset or financing from fixed to floating rate or from floating to fixed rate.

We use an interest rate sensitivity simulation to assess our interest rate risk exposure. For purposes of presenting the possible earnings effect of a hypothetical, adverse change in interest rates over the 12-month period from our reporting date, we assume that all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities will be impacted by a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates as of the beginning of the period.

Interest rate sensitive assets are assumed to be those for which the stated interest rate is not contractually fixed for the next 12-month period. Our interest rate sensitive assets include certain loan receivables, Federal Funds sold, certain amounts due from asset securitizations, interest-earning deposits in other banks and certain investment securities. Portions of our credit card loan receivables have fixed interest rates, although we have the right, with notice to cardmembers, to subsequently reprice these receivables to a new interest rate unless the account has been closed or the cardmember opts out of repricing actions. Therefore, we consider a portion of the credit card loan receivables with a fixed interest rate to be interest rate sensitive. We measured the earnings sensitivity for these assets from the expected repricing date, which takes into consideration the required notice period. In addition, assets with rates that are fixed at period end but which will mature, or otherwise contractually reset to a market-based indexed or other fixed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, also are considered to be rate sensitive. The latter category includes certain credit card loans that may be offered at below-market rates for an introductory period, such as balance transfers and special promotional programs, after which the loans will contractually reprice in accordance with our normal market-based pricing structure. For purposes of measuring rate sensitivity for such loans, only the effect of the hypothetical 100 basis point change in the underlying market-based indexed or other fixed rate has been considered rather than the full change in the rate to which the loan would contractually reprice. For assets that have a fixed interest rate at the fiscal period end but which

contractually will, or are assumed to, reset to a market-based indexed or other fixed rate during the next 12 months, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date. In addition, for all interest rate sensitive assets, earnings sensitivity is calculated net of expected loan losses.

Interest rate sensitive liabilities are assumed to be those for which the stated interest rate is not contractually fixed for the next 12-month period. Thus, liabilities that vary with changes in a market-based index, such as Federal Funds or LIBOR, which will reset before the end of the 12-month period, or liabilities whose rates are fixed at the fiscal period end but which will mature and are assumed to be replaced with a market-based indexed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, also are considered to be rate sensitive. For these fixed rate liabilities, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date.

Assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in the interest rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, we estimate that the pretax income of lending and related activities over the following 12-month period would be reduced by approximately ~~$104~~$93.2 million. We estimate the comparable reduction of pretax income for the 12-month period following November 30, 2007, to be approximately ~~$108~~$108.0 million. The hypothetical decline in pretax income was less than the prior year due to lower market-based indexes and their impact to the replacement cost of maturing ~~debt.~~debt as well as fewer interest rate sensitive liabilities. This was offset in part by widened credit spreads in some funding ~~markets.~~markets as well as fewer interest rate sensitive credit card receivables.

The model assumes that the balances of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at the period end will remain constant over the next 12-month period. It does not assume any growth, strategic change in business focus, change in asset pricing philosophy or change in asset/liability funding mix. Thus, this model represents a

static analysis that cannot adequately portray how we would respond to significant changes in market conditions such as those recently experienced. Furthermore, the analysis does not necessarily reflect our expectations regarding the movement of interest rates in the near term, including the likelihood of an immediate 100 basis point change in market interest rates, nor necessarily the actual effect on earnings if such rate changes were to occur.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. ~~Changes in~~At November 30, 2007, we had foreign currency exchange ~~rates relative to the U.S. dollar may impact earnings and capital translated from international operations. Our U.K. business generates~~risk as a result of credit card loan receivables from our U.K. business which were denominated in pounds ~~sterling which is~~sterling. These receivables were primarily funded by the issuance of debt by unrelated conduit providers and intercompany lending. We mitigated this risk by using forward contracts to hedge our net investment in international operations. As of ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008, substantially all of the remaining net assets of discontinued operations were denominated in pounds sterling. We mitigated this risk by using forward foreign ~~exchange exposure related~~currency contracts to ~~intercompany lending with our International Card segment was not hedged in anticipation~~hedge the net assets through the date these assets are expected to be dividended to its parent as well as through the date of ~~closing the sale of Goldfish in the second quarter of 2008.~~any potential post-closing adjustments.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Historically, we have relied on certain financial, administrative and other resources of Morgan Stanley to operate our business, including portions of human resources, information technology, accounting, tax, corporate

services and treasury. In conjunction with our separation from Morgan Stanley, we are currently in the process of enhancing our own financial, administrative and other support systems or contracting with third parties to replace Morgan Stanley’s systems. We are ~~also~~ establishing our own accounting and auditing policies and systems on a stand-alone basis. We have entered into agreements with Morgan Stanley under which Morgan Stanley ~~will provide~~is providing some of these services to us on a transitional ~~basis.~~basis, which are expected to end within the third quarter of 2008. We are making these changes as part of our separation from Morgan Stanley and in anticipation of reporting on our internal control over financial reporting.

Other than those noted above, there have been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In the normal course of business, the Company has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. The Company has historically relied on the arbitration

clause in its cardmember agreements, which has limited the costs of, and its exposure to, litigation. The Company is also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding its business, including, among other matters, accounting and operational matters, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, or other relief. Litigation and regulatory actions could also adversely affect the Company’s reputation.

The Company contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigation and proceedings are in the early stages, the Company cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, the Company believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of the pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although the outcome of such matters could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, our level of income for such period.

The Company filed a lawsuit captionedDiscover Financial Services, Inc. v. Visa USA Inc., MasterCard Inc. et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 4, 2004. Through this lawsuit the Company seeks to recover substantial damages and other appropriate relief in connection with Visa’s and MasterCard’s illegal anticompetitive practices that, among other things, foreclosed the Company from the credit and debit network services markets. Trial is currently scheduled for September 9, 2008. This lawsuit follows the U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2004 denial of Visa’s and MasterCard’s petition for review of the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals affirming a lower court decision in a case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice in which the court found that Visa’s and MasterCard’s exclusionary rules violated the antitrust laws and harmed competition and consumers by foreclosing the Company and American Express from offering credit and debit network services to banks. The Company also has challenged certain practices engaged in by Visa in the debit network services market as violative of the antitrust laws.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in recovering any damages in this action. Upon resolution of the litigation, after expenses, the Company will be required to pay Morgan Stanley the first $700 million of value of cash or non-cash proceeds (increased at the rate of 6% per annum until paid in full) (the “minimum proceeds”), plus 50% of any proceeds in excess of $1.5 billion, subject to certain limitations and a maximum potential payment to Morgan Stanley of $1.5 billion. All payments by the Company to Morgan Stanley will be net of taxes payable by the Company with respect to such proceeds. If, in connection with or following a change of control of the Company, the litigation is settled for an amount less than the minimum proceeds, the Company will be required to pay Morgan Stanley an amount equal to the minimum proceeds. As a result of our agreement to pay the value of non-cash proceeds, we may be required to pay amounts to Morgan Stanley in excess of cash received in connection with the litigation. The value of non-cash proceeds will be determined by an independent third party.

~~There have been no material changes to~~You should carefully consider each of the ~~risk factors~~risks described below, which supplement the risks disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, ~~2007 filed~~2007. You should also consider all of the other risks disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K in evaluating us. Our business, financial condition, cash flows and/or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks.

Future guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board may impact the accounting treatment of the securitization of our credit card receivables, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition, reserve requirements, capital requirements, liquidity, cost of funds and operations.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) is currently engaged in projects to amend Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,as amended (“FAS 140”), and FASB Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”). Currently under FAS 140, the transfers of our credit card receivables in securitization transactions qualify for sale accounting treatment. The trusts used in our securitizations are not consolidated with the ~~Securities~~Company for financial reporting purposes because the trusts are qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) under FAS 140. Because the transfers qualify as sales and ~~Exchange Commission~~the trusts are not subject to consolidation, the assets and liabilities of the trusts are not reported on ~~February 27,~~our balance sheet under GAAP.

In April 2008, the FASB proposed the elimination of the QSPE concept from GAAP, but it has not formally issued proposed amendments to FAS 140 or FIN 46R. If the QSPE concept is eliminated, our securitization structure will have to be evaluated under FIN 46R for potential consolidation. The FASB will issue its proposed amendments for public comment and, based upon public comments received and other considerations, may revise the amendments before issuing final guidance. Amendments could become effective as early as for our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008. Although we cannot at this time predict the content of the proposed or final amendments, we may lose sale accounting treatment for previous and future transfers of securitized receivables and we may be required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the trusts, which would materially affect our statement of financial condition. For example, the impact of the potential consolidation, if applied as of May 31, 2008, may require us to add approximately $26 billion of securitized receivables to our assets, add the related debt issued to third-party investors to our liabilities, and reclassify amounts due from securitization.

As a result of the addition of the securitized receivables to our balance sheet, we may be required to increase capital for Discover Bank to satisfy regulatory capital requirements. If Discover Bank were to fail to meet its regulatory capital requirements, it would become subject to restrictions that could materially adversely affect our ability to conduct normal operations, our liquidity and our cost of funds, such as limiting our ability to issue brokered deposits. See “An inability to accept or obtain brokered deposits in the future could materially adversely affect our liquidity position and funding costs” in the “Risk Factors” section in our annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, changes to the accounting treatment for securitizations may impact the market for securitizations, which could result in a weakening in investor demand for our securitized receivables. See “We may be unable to securitize our receivables at acceptable rates or at all, which could materially adversely affect our liquidity, cost of funds, reserves and capital requirements”in the “Risk Factors” section in our annual report on Form 10-K.

As noted above, we cannot at this time predict the proposed or final amendments to FAS 140 and FIN 46R, including whether our current securitization structure will satisfy any new requirements for sale accounting treatment; whether, when and in what form any transfers that currently qualify as sales will be recognized on our balance sheet; what effect the recognition of transfers would have on capital, capital requirements, the ability to maintain a sufficient level of receivables in the trust, or our results of operations; whether the amendments will cause Discover Bank to sponsor fewer securitizations; whether the amendments will trigger any financial covenants in our credit facility; or what effect the amendments will have on our credit ratings. See “We rely in part on unsecured and secured debt for our funding and the inability to access the U.S. or U.K. debt markets could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations” in the “Risk Factors” section in our annual report on Form 10-K.

For the reasons discussed above, if future guidance from FASB impacts the accounting treatment of our securitizations, it could materially adversely affect our financial condition, reserve requirements, capital requirements, liquidity, cost of funds and operations.

The success of our acquisition of Diners Club International depends upon our ability to maintain the full operability of the Diners Club International network and integrate the network with the Discover Network. If we are unsuccessful in doing so, we may be unable to sustain and grow our international network business.

On July 1, 2008, we announced our purchase of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Diners Club International for $165 million in cash from Citibank, N.A. (“Citi”). We acquired the Diners Club International network, brand, trademarks, employees, and license agreements with 44 network participants that issue Diners Club cards and that maintain an acceptance network consisting of merchant and cash access locations in 185 countries worldwide. Diners Club licensees are not included in this acquisition. Under the terms of the purchase, Citibank has agreed to remain a significant long-term international issuer on the Diners Club network. Discover will not issue cards or extend consumer credit in international markets as a result of the transaction. Over the next two to three years, we expect to integrate the Diners Club International network with the Discover Network to allow Discover Network cardholders to use their cards at merchants that accept Diners Club cards around the world, and Diners Club cardholders to use their cards on the Discover Network in North America.

The success of our acquisition of Diners Club International in the immediate term depends upon our ability to maintain the full operability of the Diners Club International network for existing Diners Club International cardholders, network participants and merchants. We rely on existing Diners Club International infrastructure to support Diners Club International network operations and the assistance of Citi during a transition period for certain network and operational support services. If we were to lose the assistance of key Diners Club personnel or Citi during the transition, we may face difficulty maintaining operations at the same level. We rely upon numerous network partners in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean for merchant acceptance for existing Diners Club International cardholders. We also rely on the Diners Club International network’s current availability of cash access locations for its existing cardholders. If we are unable to continue to offer either acceptable North American merchant acceptance or sufficient cash access locations to existing Diners Club International cardholders, we may experience decreased transaction volume, which would reduce our revenues.

The long-term success of our acquisition of Diners Club International depends upon the successful integration of the technologies of the Discover Network and the Diners Club International network. We may face difficulties in achieving interoperability between the networks, including higher overall costs or longer timeframes than anticipated, as a result of the complexity of international operations, the potential loss of key Diners Club personnel in the transition, or other factors that we cannot predict at this time. If we are unable to integrate the networks well and at a reasonable cost, we may be unable to achieve the synergies we anticipate and grow our business internationally.

If we are unable to maintain relationships with the network participants that issue Diners Club International cards and that maintain a merchant acceptance network, we may be unable to sustain and grow our international network business.

The success of our acquisition of Diners Club International largely depends upon the cooperation and support of the network participants that issue Diners Club cards and that maintain a merchant acceptance network. Unlike the Discover Network, we have minimal direct merchant relationships in the Diners Club International network, instead relying on network participants located outside the United States to help us sustain and grow our international business. As a result of a number of factors, including any difficulties in the transition and integration process, network participants may choose not to renew the license agreements with us when their terms expire. In addition, the increasingly competitive marketplace for cross-border issuance and acceptance of credit cards may result in lower participation fees for networks like the Diners Club International network. In addition, many of the merchants in the acceptance network, primarily small and mid-size merchants, may not be contractually committed to the network participants for any period of time and may cease to participate in the Diners Club International network at any time on short notice. If we are unable to continue our relationships with network participants or if the network participants are unable to continue their relationships with merchants, our ability to maintain or increase revenues and to remain competitive would be adversely affected.

The Federal Reserve Board’s proposed amendments to regulations, if adopted as proposed, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The Federal Reserve Board has proposed amendments to Regulation AA (Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices) and Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) that place limitations on certain credit card practices and mandate increased disclosures to consumers including, but not limited to, the following:

The comment periods for the proposed amendments expire in August 2008 for Regulation AA and July 2008 for Regulation Z. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated it hopes to publish final rules by the end of the year. We do not know the content of the final amendments nor the resulting impact from the amendments at this time. If the amendments are adopted as proposed, the amendments would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company of its common stock during the three months ended ~~February 29,~~May 31, 2008:

~~None~~The Company held its annual shareholders’ meeting on April 10, 2008. At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company (i) elected the persons listed below to serve as directors of the Company for a term that will continue until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal and (ii) ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for the Company and its subsidiaries for 2008.

The Company’s independent inspector of election reported the vote of the shareholders as follows:

See “Exhibit Index” for documents filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		36-2517428
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2500 Lake Cook Road Riverwoods, Illinois 60015		(224) 405-0900
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)		(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company ¨


Part 1. Financial Information		3
Item 1. Financial Statements		3
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition		3
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Income		4
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity		5
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows		6
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2528
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4753
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		4855

Part II. Other Information		4955
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		4955
Item 1A. Risk Factors		4956
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		5059
Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities		5059
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		5059
Item 5. Other Information		5060
Item 6. Exhibits		5060


	For the Three Months Ended
	February 29, 2008			February 28, 2007
Revenues⁽¹⁾	$	98,564		$	71,275

Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	23,630		$	(40,248	)
Loss on impairment of discontinued operations		(235,630	)		—

Pretax loss from discontinued operations		(212,000	)		(40,248	)
Income tax benefit		(54,385	)		(14,062	)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(157,615	)	$	(26,186	)


	For the Three Months Ended May 31,					For the Six Months Ended May 31,
	2008		2007			2008			2007
Revenues⁽¹⁾	$	29,791	$	74,785		$	128,355		$	146,060

Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	21,282	$	(63,061	)	$	44,912		$	(103,309	)
Gain (loss) on the sale of discontinued operations⁽²⁾		14,800		—			(220,830	)		—

Pretax income (loss) from discontinued operations		36,082		(63,061	)		(175,918	)		(103,309	)
Income tax expense (benefit)⁽²⁾		3,477		(22,047	)		(50,908	)		(36,109	)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	32,605	$	(41,014	)	$	(125,010	)	$	(67,200	)


	May 31, 2008		November 30, 2007
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency obligations	$	17,514	$	23,160
State and political subdivisions of states		60,572		61,091
Certificated retained interests in DCENT		881,112		310,861
Asset-backed commercial paper notes		77,408		108,681
Other securities		18,549		21,646

Total investment securities	$	1,055,155	$	525,439


	February 29, 2008		November 30 2007
Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits	$	66,892	$	52,683


	May 31, 2008				November 30, 2007
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,765,384	$	8,765,384	$	8,085,467	$	8,085,467
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale	$	958,784	$	958,784	$	420,837	$	420,837
Held-to-maturity	$	96,371	$	90,555	$	104,602	$	100,769
Net loan receivables	$	19,655,288	$	19,797,618	$	20,071,192	$	20,215,713
Amounts due from asset securitization	$	2,705,638	$	2,705,638	$	3,041,215	$	3,041,215
Other assets:
Derivative financial instruments	$	4,307	$	4,307	$	2,643	$	2,643

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	24,767,649	$	25,033,395	$	24,711,313	$	24,782,822
Short-term borrowings	$	—	$	—	$	250,000	$	250,000
Long-term borrowings	$	1,889,909	$	1,866,633	$	2,134,093	$	2,091,902
Accrued expenses and other liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments	$	3,210	$	3,210	$	19,532	$	19,532


	Total		Less Than One Year		One Year Through Three Years		Four Years Through Five Years		After Five Years
Expected maturities of the investors’ interest in securitizations	$	26,097,883	$	8,492,613	$	10,450,004	$	4,828,949	$	2,326,317


	Total		Three Months or Less		Over Three Months Through Six Months		Over Six Months Through Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000	$	19,516,877	$	2,761,935	$	3,531,068	$	4,033,953	$	9,189,921
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or greater		861,739		363,524		124,095		148,229		225,891
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts		4,503,344		4,503,344		—		—		—

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	24,881,960	$	7,628,803	$	3,655,163	$	4,182,182	$	9,415,812


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
December 1-31, 2007	3,616	$	16.00	—	$	1 billion
January 1-31, 2008	64,205	$	14.57	—	$	1 billion
February 1-29, 2008	629	$	15.09	—	$	1 billion

Total	68,450	$	14.65	—	$	1 billion


Nominees	Votes FOR	Votes AGAINST	Votes ABSTAIN
Jeffrey S. Aronin	386,053,061	35,376,687	4,962,055
Mary K. Bush	378,008,549	43,496,544	4,886,710
Gregory C. Case	386,664,450	34,762,496	4,964,857
Dennis D. Dammerman	386,757,986	34,711,762	4,922,055
Robert M. Devlin	385,305,209	36,183,839	4,902,755
Philip A. Laskawy	386,499,493	34,954,886	4,937,424
Michael H. Moskow	386,225,218	38,493,745	1,672,840
David W. Nelms	387,435,965	34,091,626	4,864,212
Michael L. Rankowitz	385,356,705	36,083,122	4,951,976
E. Follin Smith	386,408,235	34,964,643	5,018,925
Lawrence A. Weinbach	382,602,329	38,772,008	5,017,466


Discover Financial Services (Registrant)

By:		/s/S/ ROY GUTHRIE
		Roy Guthrie ~~Principal~~Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Exhibit Number		Description

2.1*		Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of the Goldfish Credit Card Business, dated February 7, 2008, among Discover Financial Services, Goldfish Bank Limited, Discover Bank, SCFC Receivables Corporation, and Barclays Bank PLC (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference thereto), as amended and restated by Amended and Restated Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of the Goldfish Credit Card Business, dated March 31, 2008, among Discover Financial Services, Goldfish Bank Limited, Discover Bank, SCFC Receivables Corporation, Barclays Bank PLC, and Barclays Group US Inc.

~~10.1~~		Fourth Amendment, dated as of December 18, 2007, to Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 3, 2004, between Discover Bank as Master Servicer, Servicer and Seller and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee (filed as Exhibit ~~4.1~~2.1 to ~~Discover Bank’s Current~~the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form ~~8-K filed on December 18, 2007~~10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

~~10.2~~		Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 29, 2008, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2007, among Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank, the subsidiary borrowers from time to time party thereto, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Discover Financial Services pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of ~~Principal~~Chief Financial Officer of Discover Financial Services pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and ~~Principal~~Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.