Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

As of ~~November 4, 2009,~~May 5, 2010, there were ~~17,988,556~~18,821,956 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008			March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks	$	21,767		$	18,475		$	20,884		$	23,016
Investment securities available for sale		34,547			34,364			39,177			37,267
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost		14,878			20,910			27,906			19,434
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		83,001			40,801			367,189			213,622
Loans receivable, net		1,622,531			1,648,378			1,640,149			1,629,284
Mortgage loans held for sale		4,960			3,903			1,668			5,658
Interest and dividends receivable		6,412			6,298			6,818			6,059
Real estate owned, net		1,204			1,141			2,864			2,613
Premises and equipment, net		21,226			21,336			21,862			22,088
Servicing asset		6,750			7,229			6,147			6,515
Bank Owned Life Insurance		39,768			39,135			40,166			39,970
Other assets		15,959			15,976			24,403			24,502


Total assets	$	1,873,003		$	1,857,946		$	2,199,233		$	2,030,028


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Deposits	$	1,357,909		$	1,274,132		$	1,381,108		$	1,364,199
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with retail customers		72,996			62,422			67,969			64,573
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		230,500			359,900			521,100			333,000
Other borrowings		27,500			27,500			27,500			27,500
Due to brokers								—			40,684
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		7,823			7,581			8,047			7,453
Other liabilities		10,103			6,628			6,328			9,083


Total liabilities		1,706,831			1,738,163			2,012,052			1,846,492


Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation preference, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 38,263 shares issued at September 30, 2009		37,345			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 55,000,000 shares authorized, 27,177,372 shares issued and 12,432,556 and 12,364,573 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		272			272
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation preference, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009								—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 55,000,000 shares authorized, 33,566,772 shares issued and 18,821,956, shares outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009								336			336
Additional paid-in capital		205,565			204,298			259,837			260,130
Retained earnings		163,487			160,267			165,277			163,063
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(11,184	)		(14,462	)		(9,102	)		(10,753	)
Less: Unallocated common stock held by Employee Stock Ownership Plan		(4,849	)		(5,069	)		(4,703	)		(4,776	)
Treasury stock, 14,744,816 and 14,812,799 shares at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		(224,464	)		(225,523	)
Treasury stock, 14,744,816 shares at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009								(224,464	)		(224,464	)
Common stock acquired by Deferred Compensation Plan		981			981			943			986
Deferred Compensation Plan liability		(981	)		(981	)
Deferred Compensation Plan Liability								(943	)		(986	)

Total stockholders’ equity		166,172			119,783			187,181			183,536


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,873,003		$	1,857,946		$	2,199,233		$	2,030,028


	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,					For the three months ended March 31,
	2009		2008		2009			2008		2010			2009
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Interest income:
Loans	$	22,618	$	23,821	$	68,581		$	72,926	$	21,984		$	23,172
Mortgage-backed securities		817		525		2,458			1,710		2,762			768
Investment securities and other		406		888		1,408			3,787		330			450

Total interest income		23,841		25,234		72,447			78,423		25,076			24,390


Interest expense:
Deposits		4,263		6,256		14,136			20,827		3,432			5,096
Borrowed funds		2,876		4,348		9,794			14,469		2,674			3,632

Total interest expense		7,139		10,604		23,930			35,296		6,106			8,728

Net interest income		16,702		14,630		48,517			43,127		18,970			15,662

Provision for loan losses		1,500		400		3,500			1,175		2,200			800

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		15,202		14,230		45,017			41,952		16,770			14,862


Other income:
Loan servicing income (loss)		119		121		(102	)		293		46			(230	)
Fees and service charges		2,700		2,625		7,804			8,292		2,557			2,518
Net gain on sales of loans and securities available for sale		1,094		466		3,119			344		503			673
Net gain from other real estate operations		67		79		71			97
Net loss from other real estate operations											(335	)		(1	)
Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance		202		314		634			957		196			231
Other		363		2		368			13		1			3

Total other income		4,545		3,607		11,894			9,996		2,968			3,194


Operating expenses:
Compensation and employee benefits		6,216		6,166		17,781			17,907		6,530			5,828
Occupancy		1,398		1,548		4,687			3,943		1,464			1,474
Equipment		478		468		1,428			1,433		476			449
Marketing		467		452		1,171			1,298		304			324
Federal deposit insurance		605		301		2,512			952		634			502
Data processing		812		779		2,506			2,375		830			835
Legal		236		683		1,086			1,754		296			577
Check card processing		287		276		792			775		317			251
Accounting and audit		135		193		466			742		143			160
General and administrative		1,719		1,397		4,948			4,086		1,708			1,384

Total operating expenses		12,353		12,263		37,377			35,265		12,702			11,784

Income before provision for income taxes		7,394		5,574		19,534			16,683		7,036			6,272
Provision for income taxes		2,860		1,852		7,448			5,420		2,632			2,319

Net income		4,534		3,722		12,086			11,263		4,404			3,953
Dividends on preferred stock and warrant accretion		537		—		1,539			—		—			458

Net income available to common stockholders	$	3,997	$	3,722	$	10,547		$	11,263	$	4,404		$	3,495


Basic earnings per share	$	0.34	$	0.32	$	0.90		$	0.97	$	0.24		$	0.30

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.34	$	0.32	$	0.90		$	0.96	$	0.24		$	0.30


Average basic shares outstanding		11,724		11,678		11,710			11,661		18,132			11,696

Average diluted shares outstanding		11,772		11,751		11,758			11,722		18,180			11,743


	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Employee Stock Ownership Plan			Treasury Stock			Common Stock Acquired by Deferred Compensation Plan			Deferred Compensation Plan Liability			Total
Balance at December 31, 2007	$	—	$	272	$	203,532		$	154,929		$	(3,211	)	$	(5,360	)	$	(225,856	)	$	1,307		$	(1,307	)	$	124,306

Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			11,263			—			—			—			—			—			11,263
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized loss on securities (net of tax benefit $3,277)		—		—		—			—			(6,085	)		—			—			—			—			(6,085	)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (net of tax benefit $316)		—		—		—			—			586			—			—			—			—			586

Total comprehensive income																											5,764

Stock awards		—		—		431			—			—			—			—			—			—			431
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan		—		—		(172	)		(24	)		—			—			196			—			—			—
Allocation of ESOP stock		—		—		—			—			—			219			—			—			—			219
ESOP adjustment		—		—		249			—			—			—			—			—			—			249
Cash dividend - $0.60 per share		—		—		—			(7,025	)		—			—			—			—			—			(7,025	)
Exercise of stock options		—		—		—			(36	)		—			—			137			—			—			101
Sale of stock for the deferred compensation plan		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(325	)		325			—

Balance at September 30, 2008	$	—	$	272	$	204,040		$	159,107		$	(8,710	)	$	(5,141	)	$	(225,523	)	$	982		$	(982	)	$	124,045

																													Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Employee Stock Ownership Plan			Treasury Stock			Common Stock Acquired by Deferred Compensation Plan			Deferred Compensation Plan Liability			Total
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	—	$	272	$	204,298		$	160,267		$	(14,462	)	$	(5,069	)	$	(225,523	)	$	981		$	(981	)	$	119,783		$	—	$	272	$	204,298		$	160,267		$	(14,462	)	$	(5,069	)	$	(225,523	)	$	981		$	(981	)	$	119,783

Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			12,086			—			—			—			—			—			12,086			—		—		—			3,953			—			—			—			—			—			3,953
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized gain on securities (net of tax expense $2,264)		—		—		—			—			3,278			—			—			—			—			3,278
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized loss on securities (net of tax benefit $1,068)																														—		—		—			—			(1,547	)		—			—			—			—			(1,547	)

Total comprehensive income																											15,364																												2,406

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants		36,921		—		1,342			—			—			—			—			—			—			38,263
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and a warrant																														36,921		—		1,342			—			—			—			—			—			—			38,263
Accretion of discount on preferred stock		179		—		—			(179	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			60		—		—			(60	)		—			—			—			—			—			—
Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan		—		—		(695	)		(221	)		—			—			916			—			—			—
Stock awards		—		—		524			—			—			—			—			—			—			524			—		—		149			—			—			—			—			—			—			149
Allocation of ESOP stock		—		—		—			—			—			220			—			—			—			220			—		—		—			—			—			74			—			—			—			74
ESOP adjustment		—		—		96			—			—			—			—			—			—			96			—		—		30			—			—			—			—			—			—			30
Cash dividend - $0.60 per share		—		—		—			(7,061	)		—			—			—			—			—			(7,061	)
Cash dividend - $0.20 per share																														—		—		—			(2,353	)		—			—			—			—			—			(2,353	)
Cash dividend on preferred stock		245		—		—			(1,355	)		—			—			—			—			—			(1,110	)		244		—		—			(398	)		—			—			—			— ��			—			(154	)
Exercise of stock options		—		—		—			(50	)		—			—			143			—			—			93
Sale of stock for the deferred compensation plan																														—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(11	)		11			—

Balance at September 30, 2009	$	37,345	$	272	$	205,565		$	163,487		$	(11,184	)	$	(4,849	)	$	(224,464	)	$	981		$	(981	)	$	166,172
Balance at March 31, 2009																													$	37,225	$	272	$	205,819		$	161,409		$	(16,009	)	$	(4,995	)	$	(225,523	)	$	970		$	(970	)	$	158,198

Balance at December 31, 2009																													$	—	$	336	$	260,130		$	163,063		$	(10,753	)	$	(4,776	)	$	(224,464	)	$	986		$	(986	)	$	183,536

Comprehensive income:
Net income																														—		—		—			4,404			—			—			—			—			—			4,404
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on securities (net of tax benefit $1,031)																														—		—		—			—			1,651			—			—			—			—			1,651

Total comprehensive income																																																							6,055

Expenses of common stock offering																														—		—		(109	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(109	)
Tax expense of stock plans																														—		—		(23	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(23	)
Stock awards																														—		—		249			—			—			—			—			—			—			249
Redemption of warrants																														—		—		(431	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(431	)
Allocation of ESOP stock																														—		—		—			—			—			73			—			—			—			73
ESOP adjustment																														—		—		21			—			—			—			—			—			—			21
Cash dividend - $0.12 per share																														—		—		—			(2,190	)		—			—			—			—			—			(2,190	)
Sale of stock for the deferred compensation plan																														—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(43	)		43			—

Balance at March 31, 2010																													$	—	$	336	$	259,837		$	165,277		$	(9,102	)	$	(4.703	)	$	(224,464	)	$	943		$	(943	)	$	187,181


	For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2010			2009
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	12,086		$	11,263		$	4,404		$	3,953

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		1,469			1,276			532			488
Amortization of ESOP		220			219
Allocation of ESOP stock								73			74
ESOP adjustment		96			249			21			30
Stock awards		524			431			249			149
Amortization and impairment of servicing asset		1,856			1,590			537			816
Net premium amortization in excess of discount accretion on securities		429			32			291			96
Net amortization of deferred costs and discounts on loans		705			727			172			113
Provision for loan losses		3,500			1,175			2,200			800
Net gain on sale of real estate owned		(166	)		(164	)		(6	)		(22	)
Recovery from reserve for repurchased loans		(245	)		(211	)		—			(34	)
Net gain on sales of loans and securities		(2,874	)		(133	)		(503	)		(639	)
Net loss on sale of fixed assets		6			—
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale		194,302			79,220			29,617			48,794
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(193,858	)		(76,582	)		(25,293	)		(46,357	)
Increase in value of Bank Owned Life Insurance		(633	)		(957	)		(196	)		(231	)
(Increase) decrease in interest and dividends receivable		(114	)		19
Increase in interest and dividends receivable								(759	)		(278	)
Increase in other assets		(878	)		(929	)		(933	)		(651	)
Increase in other liabilities		3,720			1,405
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities								(2,755	)		6,426

Total adjustments		8,059			7,367			3,247			9,574

Net cash provided by operating activities		20,145			18,630			7,651			13,527


Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease in loans receivable		20,675			25,520
Loans repurchased		—			(968	)
Proceeds from maturities or calls of investment securities available for sale		150			300
Net increase in loans receivable								(13,780	)		(3,077	)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale		1,823			3,122			—			1,823
Purchases of investment securities available for sale		—			(937	)
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities available for sale		(59,468	)		—			(203,481	)		(59,468	)
Principal payments on mortgage-backed securities available for sale		18,852			11,089			9,712			3,899
Decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock		6,032			3,811
(Increase) decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock								(8,472	)		1,879
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned		1,402			1,089			298			115
Real estate owned acquired		(332	)		—
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,365	)		(4,382	)		(306	)		(140	)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(12,231	)		38,644
Net cash used in investing activities								(216,029	)		(54,969	)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OceanFirst Bank (the “Bank”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Columbia Home Loans, LLC (“Columbia”), OceanFirst REIT Holdings, Inc., and OceanFirst Services, LLC. The operations of Columbia were shuttered in late 2007.

The interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for all of ~~2009.~~2010. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statements of financial condition and the results of operations for the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is particularly susceptible to near-term change. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in this material estimate.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

The following reconciles shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2009		2008		2009		2008		2010		2009
Weighted average shares issued net of Treasury shares	12,387		12,365		12,374		12,359		18,822		12,365
Less: Unallocated ESOP shares	(579	)	(614	)	(588	)	(623	)	(562	)	(597	)
Unallocated incentive award shares and shares held by deferred compensation plan	(84	)	(73	)	(76	)	(75	)	(128	)	(72	)

Average basic shares outstanding	11,724		11,678		11,710		11,661		18,132		11,696
Add: Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options	1		27		1		12		—		—
Incentive awards and shares held by deferred compensation plan	47		46		47		49		48		47

Average diluted shares outstanding	11,772		11,751		11,758		11,722		18,180		11,743

For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, 1,776,000 and ~~2008, 1,639,000 and 1,200,000,~~1,595,000, respectively, antidilutive stock options were excluded from earnings per share calculations. ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, 1,623,000 and 1,267,000, respectively, antidilutive stock options were excluded from earnings per share calculations.~~

For the three month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, total comprehensive income, representing net income plus or minus the change in unrealized gains or losses on securities available for sale amounted to $6,706,000 and $1,685,000, respectively. For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, total comprehensive income amounted to $15,364,000 and $5,764,000, respectively.

On May 27, 2009, the Company announced the signing of an agreement and plan of merger with Central Jersey Bancorp (“Central Jersey”), pursuant to which Central Jersey will merge with and into the Company in an all stock transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, Central Jersey common stockholders will receive 0.50 shares of the Company’s common stock for each common share of Central Jersey. On October 1, 2009, the shareholders of each of the Company and Central Jersey approved the agreement and plan of merger by the requisite number of votes. The Company expects to consummate the transaction by year-end subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval.

The amortized cost and estimated market value of investment securities available for sale at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 are as follows (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value
September 30, 2009
March 31, 2010

U.S. agency obligations	$	301	$	7	$	—		$	308
Corporate debt securities		55,000		—		(21,017	)		33,983
Equity investments		370		—		(114	)		256

	$	55,671	$	7	$	(21,131	)	$	34,547


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value
December 31, 2008

U.S. agency obligations	$	302	$	12	$	—		$	314
U. S. agency obligations										$	301	$	2	$	—		$	303
State and municipal obligations		150		—		—			150		300		—		—			300
Corporate debt securities		55,000		—		(23,314	)		31,686		55,000		—		(16,751	)		38,249
Equity investments		2,196		25		(7	)		2,214		370		—		(45	)		325

	$	57,648	$	37	$	(23,321	)	$	34,364	$	55,971	$	2	$	(16,796	)	$	39,177


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value
December 31, 2009

U. S. agency obligations	$	301	$	5	$	—		$	306
State and municipal obligations		300		—		—			300
Corporate debt securities		55,000		—		(18,631	)		36,369
Equity investments		370		—		(78	)		292

	$	55,971	$	5	$	(18,709	)	$	37,267

There were no realized gains or losses on the sale of investment securities available for sale for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the Company realized ~~gains~~a loss on the sale of investment securities available for sale of $117,000 and $239,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the Company realized losses on the sale of investment securities available for sale of $4,000 and $1,141,000, respectively.$4,000.

The amortized cost and estimated market value of investment securities available for sale, excluding equity investments, at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, investment securities available for sale with an amortized cost and estimated market value of $55.0 million and ~~$34.0~~$38.2 million, respectively, were callable prior to the maturity date.


	Amortized Cost		Estimated Market Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Market Value
September 30, 2009
March 31, 2010

Less than one year	$	301	$	308	$	601	$	603
Due after one year through five years		—		—		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		—		—		—		—
Due after ten years		55,000		33,983		55,000		38,249

	$	55,301	$	34,291	$	55,601	$	38,852

The estimated market value and unrealized loss for investment securities available for sale at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 segregated by the duration of the unrealized loss are as follows (in thousands):


	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total					Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2009
March 31, 2010

Corporate debt securities	$	—	$	—		$	33,983	$	(21,017	)	$	33,983	$	(21,017	)	$	—	$	—		$	38,249	$	(16,751	)	$	38,249	$	(16,751	)
Equity investments		256		(114	)		—		—			256		(114	)		—		—			325		(45	)		325		(45	)

	$	256	$	(114	)	$	33,983	$	(21,017	)	$	34,239	$	(21,131	)	$	—	$	—		$	38,574	$	(16,796	)	$	38,574	$	(16,796	)


	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total					Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2008
December 31, 2009

Corporate debt securities	$	—	$	—		$	31,686	$	(23,314	)	$	31,686	$	(23,314	)	$	—	$	—		$	36,369	$	(18,631	)	$	36,369	$	(18,631	)
Equity investments		1,819		(7	)		—		—			1,819		(7	)		292		(78	)		—		—			292		(78	)

	$	1,819	$	(7	)	$	31,686	$	(23,314	)	$	33,505	$	(23,321	)	$	292	$	(78	)	$	36,369	$	(18,631	)	$	36,661	$	(18,709	)

At March 31, 2010, the amortized cost, estimated market value and credit rating of the individual corporate debt securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than one year are as follows (in thousands):

At ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, the market value of each corporate debt security was below cost. The portfolio consisted of eleven $5.0 million issues spread between eight ~~issuers.~~issuers due to consolidation. The corporate debt securities are issued by other financial ~~institutions. During 2009, six~~institutions with credit ratings ranging from a high of A2 to a low of B as rated by one of the ~~issues, totaling $30.0 million, experienced~~internationally-recognized credit rating ~~downgrades to below investment grade status. Irrespective of the downgrades, all eleven of the issues were considered well-capitalized and continue to make interest payments under the terms of the~~services. These floating-rate corporate debt securities. No interest payments have been deferred. Based upon management’s analysis, the financial institutions have the ability to meet debt service requirements for the foreseeable future. These floating rate securities were purchased during the period May 1998 to September 1998 and have paid coupon interest continuously since issuance. ~~Floating rate~~Floating-rate corporate debt securities such as these pay a fixed interest rate spread over LIBOR. Following the purchase of these securities, the required spread increased for these types of securities causing a decline in the market price. The Company concluded that these available for sale securities were only temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010. In ~~addition,~~concluding that the impairments were only temporary, the Company considered several factors in its analysis. Although some credit ratings declined since December 31, 2009, the estimated market value for ~~these types~~most securities improved over the prior year-end. Additionally, the Company noted that each issuer made all the contractually due payments when required. There were no defaults on principal or interest payments and no interest payments were deferred. All of ~~securities has become increasingly illiquid and volatile. Although~~the financial institutions were also considered well-capitalized. Based on management’s analysis of each individual security, the issuers appear to have the ability to meet debt service requirements for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, although these investment securities are available for sale, the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities. AsThe Company has held the securities continuously since 1998 and expects to receive its full principal at maturity in 2028. The Company has historically not actively sold investment securities and does not utilize the securities portfolio as a ~~result,~~source of liquidity. The Company’s long range liquidity plans indicate adequate sources of liquidity outside the securities portfolio.

Capital markets in general and the market for these corporate debt securities in particular have been disrupted since the second half of 2007. In its analysis, the Company ~~concluded~~considered that the severity and duration of unrecognized losses was at least partly due to the illiquidity caused by market disruptions. Steps taken by the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and foreign central banks, among others, have been a positive force in restoring liquidity and confidence in the capital markets. The ability of each of these ~~available for sale~~issuers to raise capital during 2009 was a testament to the effectiveness of these actions.

Due to the reasons noted above, especially the continuing restoration of the capital markets, the improved valuation of the corporate securities, ~~were~~the capital position of the issuers, the uninterrupted payment of all contractually due interest, management has determined that only ~~temporarily impaired~~a temporary impairment existed at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

The amortized cost and estimated market value of mortgage-backed securities available for sale at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 are as follows (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value
September 30, 2009
March 31, 2010

FHLMC	$	13,468	$	413	$	(1	)	$	13,880	$	10,932	$	418	$	—		$	11,350
FNMA		66,098		1,659		(2	)		67,755		353,695		1,799		(969	)		354,525
GNMA		1,218		148		—			1,366		1,156		158		—			1,314

	$	80,784	$	2,220	$	(3	)	$	83,001	$	365,783	$	2,375	$	(969	)	$	367,189


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Market Value
December 31, 2008
December 31, 2009

FHLMC	$	9,593	$	114	$	(20	)	$	9,687	$	12,423	$	442	$	—		$	12,865
FNMA		29,597		171		(139	)		29,629		199,381		1,517		(1,485	)		199,413
GNMA		1,407		78		—			1,485		1,185		159		—			1,344

	$	40,597	$	363	$	(159	)	$	40,801	$	212,989	$	2,118	$	(1,485	)	$	213,622

There were no gains or losses realized on the sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and ~~2008.~~2009.

The contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities available for sale generally exceed 20 years; however, the effective lives are expected to be shorter due to principal prepayments.

The estimated market value and unrealized loss for mortgage-backed securities available for sale at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, segregated by the duration of the unrealized loss are as follows (in thousands):

The mortgage-backed securities are issued and guaranteed by ~~either FHLMC or~~ FNMA, ~~corporations~~a corporation which ~~are~~is chartered by the United States Government and whose debt obligations are typically rated AAA by one of the ~~internationally recognized~~internationally-recognized credit rating services. FNMA has been under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Financial Agency since September 8, 2008. The conservatorship has no specified termination date. Also, FNMA has entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, which following the issuance of Senior Preferred Stock and Warrants to the United States Treasury, provides FNMA funding commitments from the United States Treasury. The Company considers the unrealized losses to be the result of changes in interest rates

which over time can have both a positive and negative impact on the estimated market value of the mortgage-backed securities. Although these mortgage-backed securities are available for sale, the Company does not ~~have the intent~~intend to sell these securities ~~and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities.~~before recovery of their amortized cost. As a result, the Company concluded that these available for sale securities were only temporarily impaired at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

Loans receivable, net at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008			March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
Real estate:
One-to-four family	$	974,117		$	1,039,375		$	953,612		$	954,736
Commercial real estate, multi-family and land		368,063			329,844
Commercial real estate, multi- family and land								402,098			396,883
Construction		10,696			10,561			9,585			9,241
Consumer		217,050			222,797			215,115			217,290
Commercial		68,617			59,760			75,423			70,214

Total loans		1,638,543			1,662,337			1,655,833			1,648,364

Loans in process		(2,278	)		(3,586	)		(3,262	)		(3,466	)
Deferred origination costs, net		4,906			5,195			4,878			4,767
Allowance for loan losses		(13,680	)		(11,665	)		(15,632	)		(14,723	)

Total loans, net		1,627,491			1,652,281			1,641,817			1,634,942

Less: Mortgage loans held for sale		4,960			3,903			1,668			5,658

Loans receivable, net	$	1,622,531		$	1,648,378		$	1,640,149		$	1,629,284

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ is as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	12,758		$	10,919		$	11,665		$	10,468		$	14,723		$	11,665
Provision charged to operations		1,500			400			3,500			1,175			2,200			800
Charge-offs		(578	)		(104	)		(1,492	)		(641	)		(1,381	)		(452	)
Recoveries		—			3			7			216			90			6

Balance at end of period	$	13,680		$	11,218		$	13,680		$	11,218		$	15,632		$	12,019

An analysis of the reserve for repurchased loans for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ is as follows (in thousands). The reserve is included in other liabilities in the accompanying statements of financial condition.


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010		2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	835		$	1,705		$	1,143		$	2,398		$	819	$	1,143
Recoveries		—			(50	)		(245	)		(211	)		—		(34	)
Loss on loans repurchased		(16	)		(475	)		(79	)		(1,007	)		—		—

Balance at end of period	$	819		$	1,180		$	819		$	1,180		$	819	$	1,109

The reserve for repurchased loans was established to provide for expected losses related to outstanding loan repurchase requests and additional repurchase requests which may be received on loans previously sold to investors. In establishing the reserve for repurchased loans, the Company considered all types of sold loans. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, there ~~were no~~is one outstanding loan repurchase ~~requests outstanding.~~request on a loan with a principal balance of $236,000 which the Company is evaluating. There are also six claims from one loan investor totaling $2.2 million that the Company believes are covered by a settlement agreement and release between Columbia and the loan investor executed in August 2007. The Company intends to vigorously contest these claims and believes there are valid defenses, including the settlement and release agreement.

The major types of deposits at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 were as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
Type of Account

Non-interest-bearing	$	111,257	$	97,278	$	117,562	$	107,721
Interest-bearing checking		599,379		517,334		615,618		615,347
Money market deposit		96,262		84,928		100,086		96,886
Savings		228,301		207,224		243,970		232,081
Time deposits		322,710		367,368		303,872		312,164

Total deposits	$	1,357,909	$	1,274,132	$	1,381,108	$	1,364,199

~~In June 2008,~~Accounting Standards Certification (“ASC”) 810,Consolidation, replaces the ~~Emergency Issues Task Force (“EITF”)~~quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable-interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable-interest entity that most significantly effect the entity’s economic performance and (i) the obligation to absorb losses of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued EITF 03-6-1, as codified in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” (ASC 260), which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities priorentity or (ii) the right to ~~vesting~~receive benefits from the entity. The pronouncement was effective January 1, 2010 and therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share. EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of EITF 03-6-1 did not have a ~~material impact~~significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASC 860,Transfers and Servicing, improves the information a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, including the effect of a transfer on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows and the transferor’s continuing involvement in the transferred assets. ASC 860 eliminates the concept of a qualifying, special-purpose entity and changes the guidance for evaluation for consolidation. This pronouncement was effective January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 under ASC 820 requires new disclosures and clarifies certain existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. Specifically, the update requires an entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for such transfers. A reporting entity is required to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs. In ~~April 2009,~~addition, the ~~FASB issued~~update clarifies the following ~~three Staff Positions:~~

~~Staff Position No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity~~existing disclosure: (i) for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” as codified in FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” (ASC 820). This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, when the volume and levelpurposes of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. This FSP emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation technique(s) used, the objective of areporting fair value measurement ~~remains~~for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the ~~same. Fair value~~appropriate classes of assets; and (ii) a reporting entity is ~~the price that would be received~~required to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.

~~All of the FSPs~~both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after ~~June~~December 15, ~~2009.~~2009, except for the separate disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The ~~adoption of the FSPs~~new guidance did not have a ~~material~~significant impact on the Company’s ~~financial statements.~~

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” as codified in FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events” (ASC 855). SFAS No. 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but beforeconsolidated financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 during the second quarter of 2009. In accordance with SFAS No. 165, the Company evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial statements are filed (November 9, 2009). The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and earnings per share.other than additional disclosures.

The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:								Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
September 30, 2009
March 31, 2010

Items measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities available for sale	$	34,547	$	564	$	33,983	$	—
Investment securities available for sale:
Corporate debt securities									$	38,249	—	$	38,249	—
Other securities										928	628		300	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		83,001		—		83,001		—		367,189	—		367,189	—

Items measured on a non-recurring basis:
Real estate owned		1,204		—		—		1,204		410	—		—	410
Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral in accordance with SFAS No.114		389		—		—		389
Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral										3,461	—		—	3,461

December 31, 2008
											Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
Investment securities available for sale		34,364		709		33,655		—
									Total Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
December 31, 2009

Items measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities available for sale:
Corporate debt securities									$	36,369	—	$	36,369	—
Other securities										898	598		300	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		40,801		—		40,801		—		213,622	—		213,622	—

Items measured on a non-recurring basis:
Real estate owned										2,613	—		—	2,613
Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral										499	—		—	499

Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. Most of the Company’s investment and mortgage-backed securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are bought and sold in active markets. Prices for these instruments are obtained through third party pricing vendors or security industry sources that actively participate in the buying and selling of securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotation and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities.

The Company utilizes third party pricing services to obtain market values for its corporate bonds. Management’s policy is to obtain and review all available documentation from the third party pricing service relating to their market and value determinations, including their methodology and summary of inputs. Management reviews this documentation, makes inquiries of the third party pricing service and makes a determination as to the level of valuation inputs. Based on the Company’s review of available documentation and discussions with the third party pricing service, management concluded that Level 2 inputs were utilized. The significant observable inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities and observations of equity and credit default swap curves related to the issuer.

Real estate owned and loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral are recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs. Fair value is based on independent appraisals.

Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments.

~~The fair value~~Most of the Company’s investment and mortgage-backed securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are bought and sold in active markets. Prices for these instruments are obtained through third party pricing vendors or security industry sources that actively participate in the buying and selling of securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotations and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is ~~estimated based~~a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on ~~bid quotations received from~~quoted prices for the specific securities, ~~dealers, if available. If a quoted market price was not available, fair value was estimated using quoted market prices of similar instruments, adjusted for differences between~~but comparing the ~~quoted instruments and the instruments being valued.~~securities to benchmark or comparable securities.

The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) stock is its carrying value since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed. There is no active market for this stock and the Company is required to maintain a minimum investment based upon the outstanding balance of mortgage related assets and outstanding borrowings.

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential mortgage, construction, consumer and commercial. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms.

Fair value of performing and non-performing loans was estimated by discounting the future cash flows, net of estimated prepayments, at a rate for which similar loans would be originated to new borrowers with similar terms. Fair values estimated in this manner do not fully incorporate an exit price approach to fair value, but instead are based on a comparison to current market rates for comparable loans.

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, and interest-bearing checking accounts and money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand. The related insensitivity of the majority of these deposits to interest rate changes creates a significant inherent value which is not reflected in the fair value reported. The fair value of time deposits are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Fair value estimates are based on discounting contractual cash flows using rates which approximate the rates offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s significant financial instruments as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 are presented in the following tables (in thousands).


	Book Value		Fair Value		Book Value		Fair Value
September 30, 2009
March 31, 2010
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	21,767	$	21,767	$	20,884	$	20,884
Investment securities available for sale		34,547		34,547		39,177		39,177
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		83,001		83,001		367,189		367,189
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock		14,878		14,878		27,906		27,906
Loans receivable and mortgage loans held for sale		1,627,491		1,622,004		1,641,817		1,643,207
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits		1,357,909		1,360,998		1,381,108		1,383,665
Borrowed funds		330,996		334,018		616,569		617,619


					Book Value		Fair Value
December 31, 2009
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks					$	23,016	$	23,016
Investment securities available for sale						37,267		37,267
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale						213,622		213,622
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock						19,434		19,434
Loans receivable and mortgage loans held for sale						1,634,942		1,628,898
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits						1,364,199		1,366,206
Borrowed funds						425,073		427,061

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other significant unobservable inputs. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include deferred tax assets, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

On January 16, 2009, (the “Closing Date”) as part of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement (“Letter Agreement”) and a Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms attached thereto (“Securities Purchase Agreement”) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, and the Treasury agreed to purchase, (i) 38,263 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Preferred Shares”), having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (ii) a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 380,853 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value (“Common Stock”), at an exercise price of $15.07 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $38.3 million in cash.

Cumulative dividends on the Preferred Shares will accrue on the liquidation preference at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter, but will be paid only if, as and when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Preferred Shares have no maturity date and rank senior to the Common Stock with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Company. Notwithstanding any provision in the Securities Purchase Agreement, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) permits the Company, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury after consultation with the Office

of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), to repurchase the Preferred Shares without regard to whether the Company has raised gross proceeds from a Qualified Equity Offering or any other source and without regard to any waiting period. In the event the Company would repurchase the Preferred Shares, the Company may also repurchase the Warrants at the fair market value as determined by the Board of Directors in reliance on an opinion of a nationally recognized investment banking firm. In the event the Treasury does not accept such fair market value as determined by the Board, either party may submit to an appraisal procedure as set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement. The Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Preferred Shares and Warrant were sold, contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the Common Stock (including with respect to the payment of cash dividends in excess of $0.20 per share, which was the amount of the last regular dividend declared by the Company prior to October 14, 2008). There are additional limitations on the Company’s ability to repurchase its common stock and repurchase or redeem its trust preferred securities, and the Company is subjected to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) and the ARRA. The Securities Purchase Agreement and all related documents may be amended unilaterally by the Treasury to the extent required to comply with any changes in applicable Federal statutes after the execution thereof.

Of the $38.3 million in issuance proceeds, $36.9 million and $1.3 million were allocated to the Preferred Shares and the Warrant, respectively, based upon their relative fair values as of the Closing Date. The resulting discount of $1.3 million is accreted by a charge to retained earnings over a five year estimated life.

On October 14, 2009, the Company notified the OTS of its intent to repurchase the Preferred Stock as permitted under the EESA, as amended by the ARRA. In connection with this repurchase of the Preferred Stock, the Company expects to pay Treasury the original investment amount of $38.3 million plus accrued and unpaid dividends in exchange for the cancelled share certificate for the Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the letter agreement, the Company also intends to negotiate to repurchase the Warrant within 15 days of entering into the letter agreement. The price for the Warrant will be subject to negotiation, and there can be no assurance that a price will be agreed upon between the Company and the Treasury or that the Warrant will be repurchased.

On November 3, 2009 the Company closed on a public offering of 5,556,000 shares of its common stock at $9.00 per share. Additionally, the Company granted the underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to 833,400 shares to cover over-allotments, if any. The over-allotment option was exercised and is expected to close on November 10, 2009. Net proceeds from the offering, including the over-allotment, are expected to be $54.0 million, after anticipated expenses. The Company expects to use the net proceeds to repurchase the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A sold to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program and to repurchase the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of Central Jersey sold to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program, in the event such Preferred Stock remains outstanding after consummation of the merger. Net proceeds of the offering not used to repurchase the Preferred Stock will be used for general corporate purposes.

Note 1 to the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, as supplemented by this report, contains a summary of significant accounting policies. Various elements of these accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. Certain assets are carried in the consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. ~~Judgments regarding securities impairment and policies~~Policies with respect to the methodologies used to determine the allowance for loan losses, the reserve for repurchased loans and the valuation of Mortgage Servicing Rights and judgments regarding securities impairment are the most critical accounting policies because they are important to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. These judgments and policies involve a higher degree of complexity and require management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments, assumptions and estimates could result in material differences in the results of operations or financial condition. These critical accounting policies and their application are reviewed periodically and, at least annually, with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

The Company’s results of operations are primarily dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Company also generates non-interest income such as income from loan sales, loan servicing, loan originations, merchant credit card services, deposit accounts, the sale of alternative investments, trust and asset management services and other fees. The Company’s operating expenses primarily consist of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, marketing, data processing, Federal deposit insurance and

general and administrative expenses. The Company’s results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory agencies.

~~On January 16,~~Throughout 2009, the Company received $38.3 million in proceeds from the issuance of Preferred Shares and Warrants to the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program. Proceeds from the Preferred Shares were supplemented with FHLB borrowings and the combined amount was initially invested in mortgage-backed securities and Bank-originated loans. Cash flows generated by the Company as a result of the Preferred Shares investment are currently invested in additional Bank-originated loans. The initial investment strategy was designed to effectively eliminate earnings dilution from the Preferred Shares dividend and Warrant accretion. The addition of Preferred Shares to the Company’s total stockholder equity increased the Company’s tangible equity to assets ratio to 8.9% at September 30, 2009 from 6.5% at December 31, 2008.

~~In late 2008,~~ and continuing into ~~2009,~~2010, short-term interest rates ~~declined~~remained low and the interest rate yield curve ~~steepened.~~was unusually steep. This environment has generally had a positive impact on the Bank’s results of operations and net interest margin. Interest-earning assets, both loans and securities, are generally priced against longer-term indices, while interest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings, are generally priced against shorter-term indices. The overall economy remains weak with continued high unemployment coupled with concern surrounding the housing market. These conditions have had an adverse impact on the Bank’s results of operations as non-performing loans and the provision for loan losses have increased.

Net interest income represents the difference between income on interest-earning assets and expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends upon the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rate earned or paid on them.

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and ~~2008.~~2009. The yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown except where noted otherwise. Average balances are derived from average daily balances. The yields and costs include certain fees which are considered adjustments to yields.


	FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,												FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
	2009						2008						2010						2009
	AVERAGE BALANCE		INTEREST		AVERAGE YIELD/ COST		AVERAGE BALANCE		INTEREST		AVERAGE YIELD/ COST		AVERAGE BALANCE		INTEREST		AVERAGE YIELD/ COST		AVERAGE BALANCE		INTEREST		AVERAGE YIELD/ COST
		(Dollars in thousands)											(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits and short-term investments	$	—	$	—	—	%	$	11,949	$	185	2.06	%
Investment securities (1)		55,906		756	1.80			62,074		2,374	5.10		$	55,971	$	126	.90	%	$	56,136	$	301	2.14	%
FHLB stock		17,115		652	5.08			20,280		1,228	8.07			24,284		204	3.36			19,102		149	3.12
Mortgage-backed securities (1)		85,027		2,458	3.85			48,650		1,710	4.69			307,528		2,762	3.59			76,492		768	4.02
Loans receivable, net (2)		1,646,232		68,581	5.55			1,653,794		72,926	5.88			1,632,904		21,984	5.39			1,652,110		23,172	5.61

Total interest-earning assets		1,804,280		72,447	5.35			1,796,747		78,423	5.82			2,020,687		25,076	4.96			1,803,840		24,390	5.41

Non-interest-earning assets		88,477						93,887						107,697						85,853

Total assets	$	1,892,757					$	1,890,634					$	2,128,384					$	1,889,693


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Transaction deposits	$	885,408		7,513	1.13		$	772,577		9,643	1.66		$	965,181		1,984	.82		$	844,953		2,653	1.26
Time deposits		349,514		6,623	2.53			419,712		11,184	3.55			306,230		1,448	1.89			360,136		2,443	2.71

Total		1,234,922		14,136	1.53			1,192,289		20,827	2.33			1,271,411		3,432	1.08			1,205,089		5,096	1.69
Borrowed funds		373,833		9,794	3.49			447,750		14,469	4.31			537,561		2,674	1.99			411,199		3,632	3.53

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,608,755		23,930	1.98			1,640,039		35,296	2.87			1,808,972		6,106	1.35			1,616,288		8,728	2.16

Non-interest-bearing deposits		110,379						110,157						113,518						105,363
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		16,917						17,121						22,540						16,944

Total liabilities		1,736,051						1,767,317						1,945,030						1,738,595
Stockholders’ equity		156,706						123,317						183,354						151,098

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,892,757					$	1,890,634					$	2,128,384					$	1,889,693

Net interest income			$	48,517					$	43,127					$	18,970					$	15,662

Net interest rate spread (3)					3.37	%					2.95	%					3.61	%					3.25	%

Net interest margin (4)					3.59	%					3.20	%					3.76	%					3.47	%

Comparison of Financial Condition at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009

Total assets at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 were ~~$1.873~~$2.199 billion, an increase of ~~$15.1~~$169.2 million, compared to ~~$1.858~~$2.030 billion at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

Mortgage-backed securities available for sale increased to ~~$83.0~~$367.2 million at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~$40.8~~$213.6 million at December 31, ~~2008~~2009 primarily due to ~~the $38.3~~purchases of $162.8 million, ~~investment~~all of ~~Preferred Shares proceeds from the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.~~which were issued by U.S. government sponsored enterprises.

Loans receivable, net ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$25.8~~$10.9 million to a balance of ~~$1.623~~$1.640 billion at ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, compared to a balance of ~~$1.648~~$1.629 billion at December 31, ~~2008. Growth~~2009. The growth was concentrated in commercial and commercial real estate loans of $38.2 million was offset by a decline in one-to-four family mortgage loans due to increased prepayments and the Bank’s ongoing strategy to sell longer-term, fixed-rate newly-originated one-to-four family mortgage loans. ~~Originations of mortgage loans held for sale increased to $194.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $79.2 million for the same prior year period.~~

Deposit balances increased ~~$83.8~~$16.9 million to ~~$1.358~~$1.381 billion at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 from ~~$1.274~~$1.364 billion at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. Core deposits, defined as all deposits excluding time deposits, increased ~~$128.4~~$25.2 million partly offset by a ~~$44.7~~$8.3 million decrease in time deposits as the Bank continued to moderate its pricing for ~~time deposits. FHLB~~this product. Federal Home Loan Bank advances ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$129.4~~$188.1 million to ~~$230.5~~$521.1 million at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~$359.9~~$333.0 million at December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and were primarily ~~due~~used to fund the increase in ~~deposits.~~mortgage-backed securities.

Stockholders’ equity at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 increased to ~~$166.2~~$187.2 million, as compared to ~~$120.0~~$183.5 million at December 31, ~~2008~~2009, primarily due to net income and a reduction in accumulated other comprehensive loss partly offset by the ~~issuance of $38.3 million of Preferred Shares.~~cash dividend on common stock.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 ~~and September 30, 2008~~

Net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was ~~$4.0~~$4.4 million or ~~$.34~~$0.24 per diluted share, as compared to net income available to common stockholders of ~~$3.7~~$3.5 million, or ~~$.32~~$0.30 per diluted share, for the corresponding prior year period. ~~For~~The decrease in diluted earnings per share was due to the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2009, net income available to~~higher number of average diluted shares outstanding from the issuance of additional common ~~stockholders was $10.5 million or $.90 per diluted share, as compared to net income available to common stockholders of $11.3 million or $.96 per diluted share for the corresponding prior year period.~~shares in November 2009.

Interest income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was ~~$23.8~~$25.1 million, ~~and $72.4 million, respectively,~~ as compared to ~~$25.2~~$24.4 million ~~and $78.4 million, respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. The yield on interest-earning assets declined to ~~5.32% and 5.35%, respectively,~~4.96% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~5.69% and 5.82%, respectively,~~5.41% for the same prior year ~~periods.~~period. Average interest-earning assets increased by ~~$18.5~~$216.8 million ~~and $7.5 million, respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the same prior year ~~periods.~~period. The increase was in average mortgage-backed securities which rose $40.3 million and $36.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, due to investment of the Preferred Shares proceeds from the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.$231.0 million.

Interest expense for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was ~~$7.1~~$6.1 million, ~~and $23.9 million, respectively,~~ compared to ~~$10.6~~$8.7 million ~~and $35.3 million, respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to ~~1.79% and 1.98%, respectively,~~1.35% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~2.63% and 2.87%, respectively,~~2.16% in the same prior year ~~periods. Additionally, average~~period. Average interest-bearing liabilities ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$15.8~~$192.7 million ~~and $31.3 million, respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the same prior year ~~periods. Average~~period. The increase was primarily in average borrowed funds ~~decreased $82.6~~which increased $126.4 million and ~~$73.9~~average transaction deposits which increased $120.2 million ~~respectively, for~~partly offset by a decrease in average time deposits of $53.9 million. The additional borrowings were used to fund the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to an~~ increase in ~~average deposits and average stockholder’s equity as funding sources. The increase in average stockholder’s equity was related to the issuance of Preferred Shares.~~mortgage-backed securities.

Net interest income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 increased to ~~$16.7~~$19.0 million, ~~and $48.5 million, respectively,~~ as compared to ~~$14.6~~$15.7 million ~~and $43.1 million, respectively,~~ in the same prior year ~~periods~~period reflecting a higher net interest margin and higher levels of interest-earning assets. The net interest margin increased to ~~3.73% and 3.59%, respectively,~~3.76% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 from ~~3.30% and 3.20%, respectively,~~3.47% in the same prior year ~~periods.~~period.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the provision for loan losses was ~~$1.5~~$2.2 million, ~~and $3.5 million, respectively,~~ compared to ~~$400,000 and $1.2 million, respectively,~~$800,000 in the same prior year periods. Non-performing loans increased $11.0 million at September 30, 2009 to $23.5 million from $12.5 million at September 30, 2008. Loans receivable, net decreased during the first nine months of 2009 while net charge-offs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $578,000 and $1.5 million respectively, as compared to $101,000 and $425,000, respectively, in the same prior year periods. Net charge-offs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 included $246,000 and $881,000, respectively, relating to loans originated by Columbia Home Loans, LLC, the Company’s mortgage banking subsidiary which has since been shuttered. The increase in the provision for loan losses wasperiod primarily due to the increase in non-performing loans and net charge-offs. Non-performing loans increased $4.0 million at March 31, 2010 to $32.3 million from $28.3 million at December 31, 2009. Loans receivable, net increased modestly during the first three months of 2010 while net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $1.3 million, as compared to $446,000 in the same prior year period. Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 included $844,000 relating to loans originated by Columbia, the Company’s mortgage banking subsidiary which has since been shuttered.

Other income ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$4.5~~$3.0 million ~~and $11.9 million, respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~$3.6~~$3.2 million ~~and $10.0 million, respectively,~~ in the same prior year ~~periods.~~period. Loan servicing income ~~(loss) decreased~~was $46,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to a loan servicing loss of ~~$102,000~~$230,000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 ~~from income of $293,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008~~ due to an impairment to the loan servicing asset of $263,000 recognized in the first quarter of 2009. The net gain ~~(loss)~~ on sales of loans and securities available for sale ~~was $1.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively,~~decreased to $503,000 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~net gains of $466,000 and $344,000, respectively,~~$673,000 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009 due to a decline in the volume of loans sold. The net ~~gain~~loss from other real estate operations was $335,000 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008 includes a net gain of $117,000 and~~March 31, 2010, as compared to a net loss of ~~$902,000, respectively, on investment securities transactions. For~~$1,000 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 the net gain on the sale of loans includes a reversal of the provision for repurchased loans of $0 and $245,000, respectively, as compared to reversals of $50,000 and $211,000, respectively, for the correspondingsame prior year ~~periods. Fees and service charges~~period due to write-downs in the value of properties previously acquired.

Operating expenses increased to ~~$2.7~~$12.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, as compared to ~~$2.6~~$11.8 million for the corresponding prior year period. ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 fees~~The increase was primarily related to increases in compensation and ~~service charges decreased~~employee benefits relating to ~~$7.8 million as compared to $8.3 million for the corresponding prior year period due to a decrease in trust~~incentive compensation and investment service fee revenue. Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance decreased by $112,000 and $323,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same prior year periodsstock plan expense. The increase was also due to the ~~lower interest rate environment. Other income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased over the same~~reduction in mortgage loan closings from prior year ~~periods due to the recovery of $367,000 in borrower escrow funds for Columbia Home Loans, LLC, the Company’s mortgage banking subsidiary which was shuttered~~levels. Higher loan closings in the ~~fourth quarter of 2007.~~

Operating expenses increased to $12.4 million and $37.4 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $12.3 million and $35.3 million, respectively, for the corresponding prior year ~~periods. Federal deposit insurance~~ increased deferred loan expense which is reflected as a reduction to $605,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $301,000 and $952,000, respectively, in the same prior year periods due to a special assessment of $869,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and an increase in the assessment rate for FDIC deposit insurance effective January 1, 2009. Occupancy expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was adversely affected by a second quarter charge of $556,000 relating to all future lease obligations of Columbia. In light of the economic downturn and weak real estate market, the Company no longer expects to be able to sublet the vacant office space. Therefore, the entire remaining lease obligation was recognized in the second quarter of 2009. General and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 include $413,000 and $582,000, respectively, of costs related to the Company’s previously announced merger with Central Jersey Bancorp. Under FASB 141R, “Business Combinations,” as codified in FASB ASC Topic 805 “Business Combinations” (ASC 805), these costs are expensed in the period incurred and are likely to be significant during the fourth quarter of 2009. Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 also include costs relating to the opening of two new branches in the latter part of 2008.compensation expense.

Income tax expense was ~~$2.9~~$2.6 million ~~and $7.4 million, respectively,~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to an expense of ~~$1.9~~$2.3 million ~~and $5.4 million, respectively,~~ for the same prior year ~~periods.~~period. The effective tax rate increased slightly to ~~38.7% and 38.1%, respectively,~~37.4% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to 37.0% in the same prior period.

Dividends on preferred stock and warrant accretion totaled $458,000 for three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to ~~33.2% and 32.5%, respectively,~~no amounts in the ~~same prior periods primarily due~~current year period. The preferred stock was redeemed on December 30, 2009 and the related warrant was repurchased February 3, 2010. The warrant repurchase had no effect on net income available to ~~an increase in state tax expense.~~common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of loans, FHLB and other borrowings and, to a lesser extent, investment maturities. While scheduled amortization of loans is a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Company has other sources of liquidity if a need for additional funds arises, including various lines of credit.

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding overnight borrowings from the FHLB of ~~$24.5~~$135.1 million, as compared to ~~$83.9~~$87.0 million in overnight borrowings at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. The Company utilizes the overnight line to fund short-term liquidity needs. The Company had total FHLB borrowings, including overnight borrowings, of ~~$230.5~~$521.1 million at ~~September 30, 2009, a decrease~~March 31, 2010, an increase from ~~$359.9~~$333.0 million at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

The Company’s cash needs for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 were primarily satisfied by principal payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale, increased deposits and increased short-term borrowings. The cash was principally utilized for loan originations and the purchase of mortgage-backed securities. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the cash needs of the Company were primarily satisfied by principal payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale, increased deposits and the issuance of ~~Preferred Shares.~~preferred stock. The cash provided was principally ~~utilized~~used for loan originations, the purchase of mortgage-backed securities and to reduce borrowings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the cash needs of the Company were primarily satisfied by principal payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale and increased deposits. The cash provided was principally used for loan originations and to reduce FHLB borrowings.

In the normal course of business, the Company routinely enters into various off-balance-sheet commitments, primarily relating to the origination and sale of loans. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, outstanding commitments to originate loans totaled ~~$31.8~~$50.4 million; outstanding unused lines of credit totaled ~~$205.5~~$214.4 million; and outstanding commitments to sell loans totaled ~~$23.0~~$24.3 million. The Company expects to have sufficient funds available to meet current commitments arising in the normal course of business.

Time deposits scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled ~~$233.0~~$194.6 million at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. Based upon historical experience management estimates that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with the Company.

Cash dividends on common stock declared and paid by OceanFirst Financial Corp. during the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2009~~2010 were ~~$7.1~~$2.2 million ~~relatively unchanged from~~as compared to $2.4 million in the same prior year period. On ~~October~~April 21, ~~2009,~~2010, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of ~~twenty~~twelve cents ($~~0.20)~~0.12) per common share. The dividend is payable on ~~November 13, 2009~~May 14, 2010 to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 2, 2009. Cash dividends on Preferred Shares declared and paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $1.1 million. On October 21, 2009 the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $12.50 per Preferred Share for an aggregate payment of $478,000. The dividend is payable on November 15, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of business on October 31, 2009.

The primary sources of liquidity specifically available to OceanFirst Financial Corp., the holding company of OceanFirst Bank, are capital distributions from the banking subsidiary, short-term borrowings and the issuance of ~~Preferred Shares,~~preferred and common stock, long-term debt and trust preferred securities. On January 16, 2009, the Company received $38.3 million in proceeds from the issuance of Preferred Shares and Warrants. The Company invested $19.1 million of the proceeds into the Bank and retained the remaining proceeds. For the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2009,~~2010, OceanFirst Financial Corp. received ~~$7.2 million in~~no dividend

payments from OceanFirst Bank. OceanFirst Financial Corp.’s ability to continue to pay dividends will be partly dependent upon capital distributions from OceanFirst Bank which may be adversely affected by capital constraints imposed by the ~~OTS.~~Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). Pursuant to OTS regulations, a notice is required to be filed with the OTS prior to the Bank paying a dividend to OceanFirst Financial Corp. The OTS could object to a proposed capital distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by regulation, if the OTS determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. The Bank filed a capital distribution notice with the OTS of its intention to make quarterly capital distributions of $3.6 million each throughout 2009 to OceanFirst Financial Corp. The OTS did not object to the payment of these dividends as long as the Bank remains well-capitalized after each capital distribution. Additionally, if the Bank incurs an other than temporary impairment charge relating to its investment securities so that the total proposed capital distribution exceeds net income for the year to date, plus retained net income for the preceding two years, then the Bank must submit an application requesting approval of the OTS for the remaining unpaid capital distributions. The Company cannot predict whether the OTS may object to any future notices or fail to approve any future applications to pay a dividend to OceanFirst Financial Corp. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, OceanFirst Financial Corp. held ~~$19.0~~$28.4 million in cash and ~~$256,000~~$325,000 in investment securities available for sale. Additionally, OceanFirst Financial Corp. has an available line of credit for up to $2.0 million, all of which was available at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements with tangible capital of ~~$178.7~~$188.2 million, or ~~9.4%~~8.5% of total adjusted assets, which is above the required level of ~~$28.4~~$33.1 million or 1.5%; core capital of ~~$178.7~~$188.2 million or ~~9.4%~~8.5% of total adjusted assets, which is above the required level of ~~$75.7~~$88.4 million, or 4.0% and risk-based capital of ~~$188.7~~$199.3 million, or ~~14.4%~~14.2% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the required level of ~~$104.6~~$112.7 million or 8.0%. The Bank is considered a “well-capitalized” institution under the OTS’ Prompt Corrective Action Regulations.

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company maintained tangible ~~equity of $166.2 million, for a tangible equity to assets ratio of 8.9%, and tangible~~ common equity of ~~$128.8~~$187.2 million, for a tangible common equity to assets ratio of ~~6.9%~~8.5%.

In the normal course of operations, the Company engages in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in the financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used for general corporate purposes or for customer needs. Corporate purpose transactions are used to help manage credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk or to optimize capital. Customer transactions are used to manage customers’ requests for funding. These financial instruments and commitments include unused consumer lines of credit and commitments to extend credit. The Company also has outstanding commitments to sell loans amounting to ~~$23.0~~$24.3 million.

The following table shows the contractual obligations of the Company by expected payment period as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 (in thousands):


Contractual Obligation	Total		Less than One year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years		Total		Less than One year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Debt Obligations	$	330,996	$	192,496	$	80,000	$	31,000	$	27,500	$	616,569	$	494,069	$	49,000	$	46,000	$	27,500
Commitments to Originate Loans		31,758		31,758		—		—		—		50,399		50,399		—		—		—
Commitments to Fund Unused Lines of Credit		205,516		205,516		—		—		—		214,414		214,414		—		—		—

Commitments to originate loans and commitments to fund unused lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual amount of the instruments.

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s non-performing assets consisting of ~~non-accrual~~non-performing loans and Real Estate Owned (“REO”). It is the policy of the Company to cease accruing interest on loans 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure.


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008			March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)
Non-performing loans:
Real estate – one-to-four family	$	15,814		$	8,696		$	22,633		$	19,142
Commercial real estate		4,922			5,527			4,844			5,152
Construction		67			—			368			368
Consumer		2,416			1,435			3,992			3,031
Commercial		295			385			466			627

Total non-performing loans		23,514			16,043			32,303			28,320
REO, net		1,204			1,141			2,864			2,613

Total non-performing assets	$	24,718		$	17,184		$	35,167		$	30,933

Delinquent loans 30-89 days							$	11,478		$	15,528

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable		.83	%		.70	%		.94	%		.89	%
Allowance for loan losses as percent of total non-performing loans		58.18			72.71			48.39			51.99
Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans receivable		1.44			.97			1.95			1.72
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets		1.32			.92			1.60			1.52

Included in the non-accrual loan total at March 31, 2010 was $506,000 of troubled debt restructured loans, as compared to $1.6 million at December 31, 2009. The non-performing loan total includes ~~$921,000~~$644,000 of repurchased one-to-four family and consumer loans and ~~$2.3~~$2.1 million of one-to-four family and consumer loans previously held for sale, which were written down to their fair market value in a prior period. Non-performing loans are concentrated in one-to-four family loans which comprise 70.1% of the total. At March 31, 2010, the average weighted loan-to-value ratio (using appraisal value at time of origination) of non-performing loans was 71% as compared to 58% for the total mortgage loan portfolio. The largest non-performing loan is a one-to-four family loan for $3.5 million which is secured by a first mortgage on a property with a recent appraised value of $4.1 million. The ~~two~~ largest ~~commercial non-performing loan relationships totaled $2.5 million. The largest of the two is $1.9 million and both relationships are well secured by~~ commercial real estate ~~collateral.~~ non-performing loan is a $2.0 million loan to a residential builder. The loan is secured by first mortgages on residential property and land. A specific reserve of $111,000 has been established for this loan.

The Company also classifies loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had ~~$6.8~~$10.7 million designated as Special Mention, ~~$36.5~~$50.8 million classified as Substandard and ~~$32,000~~$61,900 classified as Doubtful as compared to ~~$9.0~~$12.0 million, ~~$17.2~~$41.4 million and ~~$14,300,~~$33,000, respectively, at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. The largest Special Mention loan ~~relationship~~ at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 is ~~comprised of several credit facilities totaling $2.9~~a loan for $2.5 million to a ~~leasing company~~sports and fitness club which is current on payments but was criticized due to ~~declining revenue.~~poor operating results. The loan is secured by commercial real estate ~~auto titles, other business assets~~ and also carries a personal ~~guarantees.~~guarantee. The largest Substandard loan relationship ~~at September 30, 2009~~ is comprised of several credit facilities to a building supply company with an aggregate balance of ~~$7.0~~$6.5 million, which was current as to payments, but criticized due to declining revenue and poor operating results. The loans are well-secured by commercial real estate and other business assets. In addition to loan classifications, the Company classified investment securities with an amortized cost of $30.0 million and a carrying value of ~~$17.5~~$19.9 million as Substandard, which represents the amount of investment securities with a credit rating below investment grade from one of the internationally-recognized credit rating services.

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Bank was holding subprime loans with a gross principal balance of ~~$2.6~~$2.2 million and a carrying value, net of ~~reserves~~write-downs and lower of cost or market adjustment, of ~~$2.1~~$1.8 million, and ALT-A loans with a gross principal balance of ~~$4.9~~$4.1 million and a carrying value, net of ~~reserves~~write-downs and lower of cost or market adjustment, of ~~$4.6~~$3.9 million.

In addition to historical information, this quarterly report contains certain forward-looking statements which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company and the subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in the Company’s market area and accounting principles and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on statements. The Company does not undertake—and specifically disclaims any obligation—to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. Further description of the risks and uncertainties to the business are included in Item 1, Business and Item 1A, Risk Factors of the Company’s ~~2008~~2009 Form 10-K.

~~Item 3.~~

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored through the use of an interest rate risk (“IRR”) model. The following table sets forth the amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 which were anticipated by the Company, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or mature in each of the future time periods shown. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company’s one-year gap was negative ~~0.04%~~8.38% as compared to negative ~~5.72%~~0.04% at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.


At September 30, 2009	3 Months Or Less			More than 3 Months to 1 Year			More than 1 Year to 3 Years			More than 3 Years to 5 Years			More than 5 Years			Total
At March 31, 2010																			3 Months Or Less			More than 3 Months to 1 Year			More than 1 Year to 3 Years			More than 3 Years to 5 Years			More than 5 Years			Total
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets: (1)
Interest-earning deposits and short-term investments	$	5,475		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	5,475		$	10,086		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	10,086
Investment securities		55,000			301			—			—			370			55,671			55,300			301			—			—			370			55,971
FHLB stock		—			—			—			—			14,878			14,878			—			—			—			—			27,906			27,906
Mortgage-backed securities		10,090			29,074			17,091			17,762			6,767			80,784			20,620			57,868			97,951			64,907			124,437			365,783
Loans receivable (2)		266,676			456,125			544,725			216,415			152,324			1,636,265			289,559			457,485			548,635			215,892			141,000			1,652,571

Total interest-earning assets		337,241			485,500			561,816			234,177			174,339			1,793,073			375,565			515,654			646,586			280,799			293,713			2,112,317

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market deposit accounts		4,376			13,127			35,004			43,755			—			96,262			4,549			13,648			36,395			45,494			—			100,086
Savings accounts		12,098			30,886			82,363			102,954			—			228,301			11,044			34,134			88,352			110,440			—			243,970
Interest-bearing checking accounts		255,496			49,101			130,936			163,846			—			599,379			241,489			52,230			143,538			178,361			—			615,618
Time deposits		72,752			160,588			51,973			19,867			17,530			322,710			86,509			108,056			62,929			21,123			25,255			303,872
FHLB advances		44,500			85,000			70,000			31,000			—			230,500			355,100			71,000			49,000			46,000			—			521,100
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		72,996			—			—			—			—			72,996			67,969			—			—			—			—			67,969
Other borrowings		22,500			—			—			—			5,000			27,500			22,500			—			—			—			5,000			27,500

Total interest-bearing liabilities		484,718			338,702			370,276			361,422			22,530			1,577,648			789,160			279,068			380,214			401,418			30,255			1,880,115

Interest sensitivity gap (3)	$	(147,477	)	$	146,798		$	191,540		$	(127,245	)	$	151,809		$	215,425		$	(413,595	)	$	236,586		$	266,372		$	(120,619	)	$	263,458		$	232,202

Cumulative interest sensitivity gap	$	(147,477	)	$	(679	)	$	190,861		$	63,616		$	215,425		$	215,425		$	(413,595	)	$	(177,009	)	$	89,363		$	(31,256	)	$	232,202		$	232,202

Cumulative interest sensitivity gap as a percent of total interest-earning assets		(8.22	)%		(0.04	)%		10.64	%		3.55	%		12.01	%		12.01	%		(19.58	)%		(8.38	)%		4.23	%		(1.48	)%		10.99	%		10.99	%

Additionally, the table below sets forth the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk as measured by the change in net portfolio value (“NPV”) and net interest income under varying rate shocks as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. All methods used to measure interest rate sensitivity involve the use of assumptions, which may tend to oversimplify the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity should be reviewed in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, ~~2008. The increase in NPV in the static case at September 30, 2009 when compared to December 31, 2008 was primarily a result of the Preferred Shares issuance.~~2009.

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the SEC (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its

principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~With the following exception, the~~The Company is not engaged in any legal proceedings of a material nature at the present time. From time to time, the Company is a party to routine legal proceedings within the normal course of business. Such routine legal proceedings in the aggregate are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

On June 8, 2009, and July 15, 2009, purported class action complaints were filed against the Company, Central Jersey and each director of Central Jersey (except that Robert S. Vuono was not named in the second class action complaint) in the Superior Court of New Jersey in Ocean County. The actions were brought by two separate alleged shareholders of Central Jersey, each on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The complaints allege, among other things, that the directors of Central Jersey are in breach of their fiduciary duties to shareholders in connection with Central Jersey’s entry into the merger agreement with the Company. The complaints also allege that the Company and Central Jersey knowingly assisted the Central Jersey directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with the proposed merger.

The complaints seek, among other things, damages and injunctive relief to enjoin the Company, Central Jersey and Central Jersey’s directors from consummating the transactions contemplated under the merger agreement, along with attorneys’ fees and costs.

On September 10, 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Central Jersey directors from proceeding with the Central Jersey shareholders’ meeting scheduled for October 1, at which Central Jersey shareholders were scheduled to vote on the proposed merger transaction. On September 22, the Court issued an opinion denying plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief and as reported elsewhere herein, on October 1, 2009 shareholder meetings were held, by both the Company and Central Jersey, with shareholders of both companies voting to approve the proposed merger transaction.

One of the shareholder plaintiffs subsequently agreed to voluntarily dismiss his action and a stipulation for dismissal, with prejudice, has been submitted to the Court. The remaining shareholder plaintiff is continuing his action and has indicated that he intends to amend his complaint. The Court has directed that such amended pleading must be filed on or before November 16, 2009. The Company will evaluate the amended complaint if and when it is filed, but anticipates that it will vigorously defend against the anticipated claims and causes of action, which, it is expected, will relate to the actions of Central Jersey, the Central Jersey directors and the Company in connection with negotiation and consideration of the planned merger transaction.

For a summary of risk factors relevant to the Company, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in the ~~2008 Annual Report on~~2009 Form 10-K. ~~Additional~~There were no material changes to risk factors relevant to the Company’s operations since December 31, ~~2008 include the following:~~

~~The issuance of securities will have an impact on the shareholders of the Company~~. As noted in Note 12, Subsequent Event on November 3, 2009 the Company closed on a public offering of 5,556,000 shares of its common stock at $9.00 per share. Additionally, the Company granted the underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to 833,400 shares to cover over-allotments, if any. The over-allotment option was exercised and is expected to close on November 10, 2009. Net proceeds from the offering, including the over-allotment, are expected to be $54.0 million. The issuance of this common stock will result in a dilution in the percentage ownership of the Company by current shareholders and may adversely impact earnings per share.

~~The Bank’s Federal thrift charter may be eliminated under the Administration’s Financial Regulatory Reform Plan.~~ The administration has proposed the creation of a new federal government agency, the National Bank Supervisor (“NBS”) that would charter and supervise all federally chartered depository institutions, and all federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. It is proposed that the NBS take over the responsibilities of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which currently charters and supervises nationally chartered banks, and the responsibility for the institutions currently supervised by the OTS, which supervises federally chartered thrift and thrift holding companies, such as the Bank and the Company. In addition, under the administration’s proposal, the thrift charter, under which the Bank is organized, would be eliminated. If the administration’s proposal is finalized, the Bank may be subject to a new charter mandated by the NBS. There is no assurance as to how this new charter, or the supervision by the NBS, will affect the Bank’s operations going forward.

The elimination of the OTS, as proposed by the administration, also would result in a new regulatory authority for the Company. Such authority may impose restrictions which are the same as, or similar to, those made applicable to bank holding companies by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, including a holding company consolidated capital requirement and holding company capital maintenance requirement, as well as the Federal Reserve’s requirement that the holding company serve as a “source of strength” for the subsidiary bank. Currently, as a savings and loan holding company

supervised by the OTS, the Company is not subject to a holding company consolidated capital requirement. The Company expects that if it were to become subject to a consolidated capital requirement, it would meet the current requirement to be categorized as “well-capitalized” on a pro forma basis.

The administration’s proposal also includes the creation of a new federal agency designed to enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency (“CFPA”) would have authority to protect consumers of financial products and services and to regulate all providers (bank and non-bank) of such services. The CFPA would be authorized to adopt rules for all providers of consumer financial services, supervise and examine such institutions for compliance and enforce compliance through orders, fines and penalties. The rules of the CFPA would serve as a “floor” and individual states would be permitted to adopt and enforce stronger consumer protection laws. A recent amendment to the legislation adopted by House Financial Services Committee would exempt all banks with less than $10 billion in total assets from enforcement of consumer protection laws by the CFPA. Instead such laws would continue to be enforced by the appropriate federal banking regulator. If adopted as proposed, the Company could become subject to multiple laws affecting its provision of home loans and other credit services to consumers, which may substantially increase the cost of providing such services.

~~It is unknown at this time whether the administration’s proposal for regulatory reform will be adopted and, if so, the final form of such proposal, and what the full impact on the Company may be.~~

~~There is no guaranty that the Company will be able to continue to pay a dividend or, if continued, will be able to pay a dividend at the current rate~~. The Board of Directors of the Company determines at its discretion if, when and the amount of dividends that may be paid on the common stock. In making such determination, the Board of Directors take into account various factors including economic conditions, earnings, liquidity needs, the financial condition of the Company, applicable state law, regulatory requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Although the Company has a history of paying a quarterly dividend on its common stock, there is no guaranty that such dividends will continue to be paid in the future, particularly in the event of changes in those factors which may affect the Board of Directors’ determination to pay a dividend.

~~Deposit insurance assessments have increased substantially, which will adversely affect profits.~~ Federal law requires that the designated reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund be established by the FDIC at 1.15% to 1.50% of estimated insured deposits. If this reserve ratio drops below 1.15% or the FDIC expects that it will do so within six months, the FDIC must, within 90 days, establish and implement a plan to restore the designated reserve ratio to 1.15% of estimated insured deposits within eight years (absent extraordinary circumstances).

Recent bank failures coupled with deteriorating economic conditions have significantly reduced the deposit insurance fund’s reserve ratio. As of June 30, 2008, the designated reserve ratio was 1.01% of estimated insured deposits as of March 31, 2008. As a result of this reduced reserve ratio, on December 22, 2008, the FDIC published a final rule raising the current deposit insurance assessment rates uniformly for all institutions by seven basis points (a range from 12 to 50 basis points) for the first quarter of 2009. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule under which banks in the best risk category will pay initial base rates ranging from 12 to 16 cents per $100 on an annual basis, beginning April 1, 2009.

The FDIC also adopted an interim rule imposing a 10 basis point emergency special assessment on the industry on June 30, 2009. The assessment was collected on September 30, 2009. The Company recorded an expense of $869,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to reflect the special assessment. The interim rule would also permit the FDIC to impose an emergency special assessment after June 30, 2009, of up to 10 basis points if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance.

~~These actions will significantly increase the Company’s non-interest expense in 2009 and in future years as long as the increased premiums are in place.~~

On September 29, 2009 the FDIC announced that it had adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) that would require insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The prepayment of assessments would ensure that the deposit insurance system remains directly funded by depository institutions and preserves the FDIC’s ability to borrow from the Treasury for emergency situations. The prepayment would be collected on December 30, 2009 and would be recorded as a prepaid expense on the Bank’s balance sheet.

There can be no assurance that the actions of the FDIC will restore the insurance fund balance to the required reserve ratio of 1.15%, or that the FDIC will not be required to take further actions that may have a negative affect on the Company’s earnings or financial condition.

A special meeting of stockholders was held on October 1, 2009 to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 26, 2009, by and between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and Central Jersey Bancorp. The proposal and results of the vote are as follows:

~~Not Applicable~~The annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 6, 2010. The following directors were elected for terms of three years: Donald E. McLaughlin and John E. Walsh. The following proposals were voted on by the stockholders:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		22-3412577
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, NJ		08754-2009
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


		PAGE
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009	1

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~	2

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~	4

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2018

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2019

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2119

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2119

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2219

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2319

Item 4.	~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Removed and Reserved	2320

Item 5.	Other Information	2320

Item 6.	Exhibits	2320

Signatures		2421


	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase in deposits	$	83,777		$	31,958
Decrease in short-term borrowings		(48,826	)		(37,625	)
Repayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with the Federal Home Loan Bank		—			(12,000	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		28,000			57,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(98,000	)		(91,000	)
Increase in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		242			500
Exercise of stock options		93			101
Dividends paid – common stock		(7,061	)		(7,025	)
Dividends paid – preferred stock		(1,110	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrant		38,263			—

Net cash used in financing activities		(4,622	)		(58,091	)


Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks		3,292			(817	)

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		18,475			27,547


Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	21,767		$	26,730


Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	24,449		$	35,718
Income taxes		6,868			4,529
Non cash activities:
Transfer of loans receivable to real estate owned		967			1,141


	For the three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase in deposits	$	16,909		$	39,338
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		201,496			(11,268	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		15,000			12,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(25,000	)		(30,000	)
Increase in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance		594			910
Expenses of common stock offering		(109	)		—
Tax expense of stock plans		(23	)		—
Dividends paid – common stock		(2,190	)		(2,353	)
Dividends paid – preferred stock		—			(154	)
Redemption of preferred stock and warrants		(431	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrant		—			38,263

Net cash provided by financing activities		206,246			46,736


Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks		(2,132	)		5,294

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		23,016			18,475


Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	20,884		$	23,769


Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	6,150		$	8,858
Income taxes		2,805			7
Non cash activities:
Transfer of loans receivable to real estate owned		543			409


Security Description	Amortized Cost		Estimated Market Value		Credit Rating Moody’s/S&P
BankAmerica Capital	$	15,000	$	10,384	Baa3/BB
Chase Capital		10,000		7,803	A2/BBB+
Wells Fargo Capital		5,000		3,141	Baa1/A-
Huntington Capital		5,000		2,764	Ba1/B
Keycorp Capital		5,000		3,319	Baa3/BB
PNC Capital		5,000		3,800	Baa2/BBB
State Street Capital		5,000		3,626	A3/BBB+
SunTrust Capital		5,000		3,412	Baa3/BB

	$	55,000	$	38,249


	FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
	2009						2008
	AVERAGE BALANCE		INTEREST		AVERAGE YIELD/ COST		AVERAGE BALANCE		INTEREST		AVERAGE YIELD/ COST
		(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits and short-term investments	$	—	$	—	—	%	$	13,123	$	43	1.31	%
Investment securities (1)		55,763		167	1.20			60,379		524	3.47
FHLB stock		15,168		239	6.30			19,019		321	6.75
Mortgage-backed securities (1)		85,279		817	3.83			44,984		525	4.67
Loans receivable, net (2)		1,636,541		22,618	5.53			1,636,707		23,821	5.82

Total interest-earning assets		1,792,751		23,841	5.32			1,774,212		25,234	5.69

Non-interest-earning assets		93,544						91,203

Total assets	$	1,886,295					$	1,865,415


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Transaction deposits	$	924,360		2,356	1.02		$	799,671		3,299	1.65
Time deposits		335,073		1,907	2.28			392,893		2,957	3.01

Total		1,259,433		4,263	1.35			1,192,564		6,256	2.10
Borrowed funds		335,242		2,876	3.43			417,873		4,348	4.16

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,594,675		7,139	1.79			1,610,437		10,604	2.63

Non-interest-bearing deposits		113,879						113,303
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		16,150						18,050

Total liabilities		1,724,704						1,741,790
Stockholders’ equity		161,591						123,625

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,886,295					$	1,865,415

Net interest income			$	16,702					$	14,630

Net interest rate spread (3)					3.53	%					3.06	%

Net interest margin (4)					3.73	%					3.30	%


	September 30, 2009										December 31, 2008
	Net Portfolio Value				NPV Ratio		Net Interest Income				Net Portfolio Value				NPV Ratio		Net Interest Income
Change in Interest Rates in Basis Points (Rate Shock)	Amount		% Change		NPV Ratio		Amount		% Change		Amount		% Change		NPV Ratio		Amount		% Change
(dollars in thousands)
200	$	174,524	(9.5	)%	9.7	%	$	65,765	(4.3	)%	$	106,833	(21.5	)%	6.0	%	$	55,909	(8.8	)%
100		188,268	(2.4	)	10.3			67,653	(1.5	)		126,459	(7.0	)	7.0			59,031	(3.8	)
Static		192,886	—		10.3			68,686	—			136,020	—		7.4			61,331	—
(100)		188,488	(2.3	)	9.9			65,690	(4.4	)		136,226	0.2		7.2			59,363	(3.2	)
(200)		181,032	(6.1	)	9.5			60,985	(11.2	)		129,958	(4.5	)	6.9			56,937	(7.2	)


Proposal	For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Votes

Consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 26, 2009, by and between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and Central Jersey Bancorp	9,313,629	151,030	4,318	—

Consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the merger agreement.	8,702,372	700,360	66,245	—


Proposal	For	Against	Withheld/ Abstain	Broker Non-Votes

1) Election of Directors
Donald E. McLaughlin	14,400,920	—	428,412	—
John E. Walsh	14,407,220	—	422,171	—

2) Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.	16,986,116	113,063	28,142	—


~~2.2~~		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 26, 2009 between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and Central Jersey Bancorp.*

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp.**

3.2		Certificate of Designation ***

~~3.3~~		Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp.~~****~~

~~3.4~~		Warrant to purchase up to 380,583 shares of common stock.***

4.0		Stock Certificate of OceanFirst Financial Corp.**

31.1		~~Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(c)~~ Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		~~Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(c)~~ Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.0		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 ~~Certifications~~as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


						OceanFirst Financial Corp.
						Registrant

DATE: ~~November 9, 2009~~ May 10, 2010						/s/ John R. Garbarino
						John R. Garbarino
						Chairman of the Board, President and
						Chief Executive Officer

DATE: ~~November 9, 2009~~ May 10, 2010						/s/ Michael J. Fitzpatrick
						Michael J. Fitzpatrick
						Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Exhibit	Description	Page	Description	Page

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(c) Certification of Chief Executive Officer	26	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	23

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(c) Certification of Chief Financial Officer	27	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	24

32.0	Section 1350 Certifications	28	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	25

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-accelerated Filer

Smaller Reporting Company