UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one) | ||||||
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) | |||||
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||||
For the quarterly period ended | ||||||
OR
| ||||||
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) | |||||
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||||
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 1-8606
Verizon Communications Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 23-2259884 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
140 West Street New York, New York | 10007 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 395-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, 2,826,741,6892,826,782,631 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding, after deducting 140,868,430140,827,488 shares held in treasury.
Page | ||||||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income Three and | 2 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets At | 3 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| 4 | |||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 5 | |||||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 20 | ||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 41 | ||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 41 | ||||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 41 | ||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 41 | ||||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 41 | ||||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 42 | ||||
Signature | 43 | |||||
Certifications |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Verizon Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) (unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Revenues | $ | 26,773 | $ | 26,861 | $ | 53,686 | $ | 53,452 | $ | 26,484 | $ | 27,265 | $ | 80,170 | $ | 80,717 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales (exclusive of items shown below) | 12,239 | 10,481 | 22,956 | 20,789 | 11,250 | 10,996 | 34,206 | 31,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 8,319 | 7,871 | 16,043 | 15,432 | 7,465 | 8,111 | 23,508 | 23,543 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 4,176 | 4,091 | 8,297 | 8,119 | 4,022 | 4,172 | 12,319 | 12,291 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 24,734 | 22,443 | 47,296 | 44,340 | 22,737 | 23,279 | 70,033 | 67,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Income | 2,039 | 4,418 | 6,390 | 9,112 | 3,747 | 3,986 | 10,137 | 13,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses | 121 | 128 | 254 | 256 | 141 | 166 | 395 | 422 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income and (expense), net | 17 | 11 | 62 | 64 | (50 | ) | 13 | 12 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (679 | ) | (787 | ) | (1,359 | ) | (1,712 | ) | (597 | ) | (704 | ) | (1,956 | ) | (2,416 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income Before (Provision) Benefit For Income Taxes | 1,498 | 3,770 | 5,347 | 7,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | 49 | (610 | ) | (1,516 | ) | (1,350 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Before Provision For Income Taxes | 3,241 | 3,461 | 8,588 | 11,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (321 | ) | (574 | ) | (1,837 | ) | (1,924 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 1,547 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,831 | $ | 6,370 | $ | 2,920 | $ | 2,887 | $ | 6,751 | $ | 9,257 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | $ | 1,745 | $ | 1,677 | $ | 3,620 | $ | 3,242 | $ | 2,039 | $ | 1,711 | $ | 5,659 | $ | 4,953 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Verizon | (198 | ) | 1,483 | 211 | 3,128 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Verizon | 881 | 1,176 | 1,092 | 4,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 1,547 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,831 | $ | 6,370 | $ | 2,920 | $ | 2,887 | $ | 6,751 | $ | 9,257 | ||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Verizon | $ | (.07 | ) | $ | .52 | $ | .07 | $ | 1.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Common Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Verizon | $ | .31 | $ | .41 | $ | .39 | $ | 1.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions) | 2,827 | 2,841 | 2,831 | 2,841 | 2,829 | 2,841 | 2,830 | 2,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Verizon | $ | (.07 | ) | $ | .52 | $ | .07 | $ | 1.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Verizon | $ | .31 | $ | .41 | $ | .39 | $ | 1.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in millions) | 2,827 | 2,841 | 2,833 | 2,841 | 2,830 | 2,841 | 2,833 | 2,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | .475 | $ | .460 | $ | .950 | $ | .920 | $ | .4875 | $ | .4750 | $ | 1.4375 | $ | 1.3950 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Verizon Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts) (unaudited) | At June 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | At September 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||
Current assets | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,761 | $ 2,009 | $ | 5,394 | $ | 2,009 | ||||||||
Short-term investments | 464 | 490 | 581 | 490 | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $948 and $976 | 12,058 | 12,573 | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $881 and $976 | 11,973 | 12,573 | |||||||||||||
Inventories | 985 | 1,426 | 1,010 | 1,426 | |||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 2,793 | 5,247 | 2,383 | 5,247 | |||||||||||
Total current assets | 21,061 | 21,745 | 21,341 | 21,745 | |||||||||||
Plant, property and equipment | 234,727 | 229,381 | 217,859 | 229,381 | |||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | 142,626 | 137,052 | 130,429 | 137,052 | |||||||||||
92,101 | 92,329 | 87,430 | 92,329 | ||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated businesses | 3,797 | 3,535 | 3,832 | 3,535 | |||||||||||
Wireless licenses | 72,435 | 72,067 | 72,719 | 72,067 | |||||||||||
Goodwill | 22,467 | 22,472 | 21,933 | 22,472 | |||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 6,324 | 6,764 | 5,915 | 6,764 | |||||||||||
Other assets | 8,066 | 8,339 | 7,682 | 8,339 | |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 226,251 | $ 227,251 | $ | 220,852 | $ | 227,251 | ||||||||
Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Debt maturing within one year | $ | 7,874 | $ 7,205 | $ | 5,810 | $ | 7,205 | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 16,905 | 15,223 | 16,092 | 15,223 | |||||||||||
Other | 7,055 | 6,708 | 6,865 | 6,708 | |||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 31,834 | 29,136 | 28,767 | 29,136 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt | 49,594 | 55,051 | 47,360 | 55,051 | |||||||||||
Employee benefit obligations | 32,435 | 32,622 | 31,915 | 32,622 | |||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 21,324 | 19,310 | 21,772 | 19,310 | |||||||||||
Other liabilities | 6,591 | 6,765 | 6,414 | 6,765 | |||||||||||
Equity | |||||||||||||||
Series preferred stock ($.10 par value; none issued) | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
Common stock ($.10 par value; 2,967,610,119 shares | 297 | 297 | 297 | 297 | |||||||||||
Contributed capital | 40,108 | 40,108 | 37,921 | 40,108 | |||||||||||
Reinvested earnings | 15,117 | 17,592 | 14,621 | 17,592 | |||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (11,140 | ) | (11,479 | ) | (9,835 | ) | (11,479 | ) | |||||||
Common stock in treasury, at cost | (5,277 | ) | (5,000 | ) | (5,276 | ) | (5,000 | ) | |||||||
Deferred compensation – employee stock ownership plans and other | 149 | 88 | 189 | 88 | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 45,219 | 42,761 | 46,707 | 42,761 | |||||||||||
Total equity | 84,473 | 84,367 | 84,624 | 84,367 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 226,251 | $ 227,251 | $ | 220,852 | $ | 227,251 | ||||||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Verizon Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries
Six Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) (unaudited) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 3,831 | $ | 6,370 | $ | 6,751 | $ | 9,257 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 8,297 | 8,119 | 12,319 | 12,291 | ||||||||||||
Employee retirement benefits | 2,518 | 1,420 | 3,909 | 2,533 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,354 | 1,296 | 2,332 | 2,672 | ||||||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts | 680 | 643 | 922 | 917 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses, net of dividends received | (227 | ) | 173 | 82 | 21 | |||||||||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects from | 1,502 | (2,070 | ) | 640 | (2,337 | ) | ||||||||||
Other, net | (1,082 | ) | (1,814 | ) | (1,742 | ) | (2,236 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 16,873 | 14,137 | 25,213 | 23,118 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | ||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures (including capitalized software) | (7,685 | ) | (8,094 | ) | (11,843 | ) | (12,450 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisitions of licenses, investments and businesses, net of cash acquired | (538 | ) | (5,367 | ) | (1,027 | ) | (5,627 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from dispositions | 2,594 | – | 2,594 | – | ||||||||||||
Net change in short-term investments | (17 | ) | 119 | (34 | ) | 78 | ||||||||||
Other, net | 37 | 64 | 151 | 51 | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (5,609 | ) | (13,278 | ) | (10,159 | ) | (17,948 | ) | ||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings | – | 12,040 | – | 12,040 | ||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term borrowings and capital lease obligations | (4,594 | ) | (18,173 | ) | (7,941 | ) | (18,966 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in short-term obligations, excluding current maturities | (97 | ) | (103 | ) | (1,097 | ) | (1,454 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid | (2,690 | ) | (2,614 | ) | (4,034 | ) | (3,920 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from access line spin-off | 3,083 | – | ||||||||||||||
Other, net | (1,131 | ) | (971 | ) | (1,680 | ) | (1,436 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (8,512 | ) | (9,821 | ) | (11,669 | ) | (13,736 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 2,752 | (8,962 | ) | 3,385 | (8,566 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 2,009 | 9,782 | 2,009 | 9,782 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 4,761 | $ | 820 | $ | 5,394 | $ | 1,216 | ||||||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Verizon Communications Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared based upon Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules that permit reduced disclosure for interim periods. For a more complete discussion of significant accounting policies and certain other information, you should refer to the financial statements included in the Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon or the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations and financial condition for the interim periods shown including normal recurring accruals and other items. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
We have reclassified prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
During the three and six months ended June 30,second quarter of 2010, we recorded a one-time non-cash adjustment of $268 million primarily to reduce wireless data revenues. This adjustment was recorded to properly defer previously recognized wireless data revenues that will be earned and recognized in future periods. As the amounts involved were not material to our consolidated financial statements in the current or any previous reporting period, the adjustment was recorded during the second quarter, which reduced Net income (loss) attributable to Verizon during the quarter by $92 million.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In January 2010, we adopted the accounting standard update regarding consolidation accounting for variable interest entities. This standard update requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the entity’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling interest in a variable interest entity. The adoption of this accounting standard update did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, we adopted the accounting standard update regarding fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires additional disclosures regarding assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The adoption of this accounting standard update did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Standards
In July 2010, the accounting standard update regarding disclosures for finance receivables and allowances for credit losses was issued. This standard update requires that entities disclose information at more disaggregated levels than currently required. We will adopt this standard update during the fourth quarter of 2010. The adoption of this standard update is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the accounting standard update regarding revenue recognition for multiple deliverable arrangements was issued. This update requires the use of the relative selling price method when allocating revenue in these types of arrangements. This method allows a vendor to use its best estimate of selling price if neither vendor specific objective evidence nor third party evidence of selling price exists when evaluating multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact that this standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the accounting standard update regarding revenue recognition for arrangements that include software elements was issued. This update requires tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that work together to deliver the products’ essential functionality to be evaluated under the accounting standard regarding multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact that this standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Earnings Per Common Share
As a result of the Net loss attributable to Verizon for the three months ended June 30, 2010, diluted earnings per share is the same as basic earnings per share. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, diluted earnings per share would have included the dilutive effect of shares issuable under our stock-based compensation plans of 2 million shares. In addition, certain outstanding stock options to purchase shares for approximately 77 million weighted-average shares, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010 because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period, which represents the only additional potential dilution. There were a total of approximately 2 million stock options and restricted stock units outstanding to purchase shares included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2010. There were no dilutive stock options or restricted stock units outstanding to purchase shares included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010. There were no dilutive stock options outstanding included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Certain outstanding options to purchase shares were also not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period, including 84 million weighted-average shares for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and approximately 11559 million weighted-average shares and 11878 million weighted-average shares for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, respectively, and approximately 111 million weighted-average shares and 115 million weighted-average shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
2. | Dispositions and Other |
Telephone Access Line Spin-off
On May 13, 2009, we announced plans to spin off a newly formed subsidiary of Verizon (Spinco) to our stockholders and for Spinco to merge with Frontier Communications Corporation (Frontier) immediately following the spin-off pursuant to a definitive agreement with Frontier, with Frontier to be the surviving corporation.
On July 1, 2010, after receiving regulatory approval, we completed the spin-off of the shares of Spinco to Verizon stockholders and the merger of Spinco with Frontier, resulting in Verizon stockholders collectively owning approximately 68 percent of Frontier’s equity which was outstanding immediately following the merger. Frontier issued approximately 678.5 million shares of Frontier common stock in the aggregate to Verizon stockholders in the merger, and Verizon stockholders received one share of Frontier common stock for every 4.165977 shares of Verizon common stock they owned as of June 7, 2010. Verizon stockholders have received cash in lieu of any fraction of a share of Frontier common stock to which they otherwise were entitled.
At the time of the spin-off and the merger, Spinco held defined assets and liabilities of the local exchange business and related landline activities of Verizon in Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin, and in portions of California bordering Arizona, Nevada and Oregon, including Internet access and long distance services and broadband video provided to designated customers in those areas. The transactions did not involve any assets or liabilities of Verizon Wireless. The merger resulted in Frontier acquiring approximately 4 million access lines and certain related businesses from Verizon, which collectively generated annual revenues of approximately $4 billion for Verizon's Wireline segment during 2009 and approximately $1.7 billion of revenue for Verizon’s Wireline segment during 2009.the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
Pursuant to the terms of Verizon’s equity incentive plans, shortly following the closing of the spin-off and the merger, the number of outstanding and unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance stock units (PSUs) held by current and former Verizon employees (including Verizon employees who became employees of Frontier in connection with the merger) was increased to reflect a number of additional units approximately equal to the cash value of the Frontier common stock that the holders of the RSUs and PSUs would have received with respect to hypothetical shares of Verizon common stock subject to awards under those plans. In addition, the exercise prices and number of shares of Verizon common stock underlying stock options to purchase shares of Verizon common stock previously granted to employees under equity incentive plans were adjusted pursuant to the terms of those plans to take into account the decrease in the value of Verizon common stock immediately following the spin-off and merger.
The total value of the transaction to Verizon and its stockholders was approximately $8.6 billion. Verizon stockholders received $5.247 billion in Frontier common stock (based on the valuation formula contained in the merger agreement with Frontier) as described above, and Verizon received $3.333 billion in aggregate value, comprised of $3.083 billion in the form of a special cash payment from Spinco and $250 million in a reduction in Verizon’s consolidated indebtedness. During July 2010, Verizon used the proceeds from the special cash payment to reduce its consolidated indebtedness (see Note 4). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 include the operations acquired by Frontier which we owned through June 30,prior to the completion of the spin-off on July 1, 2010. The spin-off decreased Total equity and Goodwill by approximately $1.9 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively, including a reduction in Accumulated other comprehensive loss of approximately $0.2 billion related to defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans.
On April 12, 2010, Spinco completed a financing of $3.2 billion in principal amount of notes. The gross proceeds of the offering were deposited into an escrow account. Immediately prior to the spin-off on July 1, 2010, the funds in the escrow account representing the net cash proceeds from the offering were released to Spinco, and Spinco used substantially allVerizon. These proceeds are reflected in the condensed consolidated statement of those proceeds to make the special cash payment to Verizon noted above.flows as Proceeds from access line spin-off.
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded charges of $195$123 million and $340$463 million, respectively, primarily for costs incurred related to network, non-network software and other activities to enable the divested markets in the transaction with Frontier to operate on a stand-alone basis subsequent to the closing of the transaction with Frontier. Also included in these charges are fees related to early extinguishment of debt, as well as professional advisory and legal fees incurred in connection with the Frontier transaction.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded charges of $62 million primarily for costs incurred related to network, non-network software and other activities to enable the divested markets to operate on a stand-alone basis subsequent to the closing of the transaction with Frontier, as well as professional advisory and legal fees incurred in connection with this transaction.
Alltel Divestiture Markets
As a condition of the regulatory approvals by the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission to complete the acquisition of Alltel Corporation (Alltel) in January 2009, Verizon Wireless was required to divest overlapping properties in 105 operating markets in 24 states (Alltel Divestiture Markets). Total assets and total liabilities divested were $2.6 billion and $0.1 billion, respectively, principally comprised of network assets, wireless licenses and customer relationships that were included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other current liabilities, respectively, on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009.
On May 8, 2009, Verizon Wireless entered into a definitive agreement with AT&T Mobility LLC (AT&T Mobility), a subsidiary of AT&T Inc., pursuant to which AT&T Mobility agreed to acquire 79 of the 105 Alltel Divestiture Markets, including licenses and network assets, for approximately $2.4 billion in cash. On June 9, 2009, Verizon Wireless entered into a definitive agreement with Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (ATN), pursuant to which ATN agreed to acquire the remaining 26 Alltel Divestiture Markets, including licenses and network assets, for $200 million in cash. During the second quarter of 2010, Verizon Wireless received the necessary regulatory approvals and completed both transactions. Upon completion of the divestitures, we recorded a tax charge of approximately $192 million for the taxable gain on the excess of book over tax basis of the goodwill associated with the Alltel Divestiture Markets.
Other
On August 23, 2010, Verizon Wireless acquired the net assets and related customers of six operating markets in Louisiana and Mississippi in a transaction with AT&T Inc. for cash consideration of $235 million. These assets were acquired to enhance Verizon Wireless’ network coverage in these operating markets. The preliminary purchase price allocation primarily resulted in $106 million of wireless licenses and $76 million in goodwill.
Merger Integration and Acquisition Related Charges
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded merger integration charges of $187$159 million and $292$451 million, respectively, primarily related to the Alltel acquisition. These charges primarily related to handset conversions, trade name amortization and the decommissioning of overlapping cell sites and trade name amortization.sites.
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we recorded merger integration and acquisition charges of $228$277 million and $684$961 million, respectively,respectively. These charges primarily related to the Alltel acquisition forand were comprised of trade name amortization, re-branding initiatives and handset conversions. The charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were also comprised of transaction fees and costs associated with the acquisition, including fees related to the bridgecredit facility that was entered into and utilized to complete the acquisition. The charges also included trade name amortization, handset conversions and the decommissioning of overlapping cell sites.
3. | Wireless Licenses, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Wireless Licenses
Changes in the carrying amount of Wireless licenses are as follows:
(dollars in millions) | |||
Balance at January 1, 2010 | $ | 72,067 | |
Capitalized interest on wireless licenses | 361 | ||
Reclassifications, adjustments and other | 7 | ||
Balance at June 30, 2010 | $ | 72,435 | |
(dollars in millions) | ||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 | $ | 72,067 | ||
Wireless licenses acquired (Note 2) | 106 | |||
Capitalized interest on wireless licenses | 538 | |||
Reclassifications, adjustments and other | 8 | |||
Balance at September 30, 2010 | $ | 72,719 | ||
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $12.1 billion and $12.2 billion respectively, of wireless licenses were under development for commercial service for which we are capitalizing interest costs.
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of Goodwill are as follows:
(dollars in millions) | Domestic Wireless | Wireline | Total | Domestic Wireless | Wireline | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 | $ | 17,738 | $ | 4,734 | $ | 22,472 | $ | 17,738 | $ | 4,734 | $ | 22,472 | |||||||||||
Acquisitions (Note 2) | 76 | – | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Divestitures (Note 2) | – | (614 | ) | (614 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassifications, adjustments and other | – | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | – | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 | $ | 17,738 | $ | 4,729 | $ | 22,467 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 | $ | 17,814 | $ | 4,119 | $ | 21,933 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Intangible Assets
The following table displays the composition of Other intangible assets, net:
At June 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | At September 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer lists (6 to 8 years) | $ | 3,115 | $ | (1,272 | ) | $ | 1,843 | $ | 3,134 | $ | (1,012 | ) | $ | 2,122 | $ | 3,146 | $ | (1,417 | ) | $ | 1,729 | $ | 3,134 | $ | (1,012 | ) | $ | 2,122 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-network internal-use | 8,270 | (4,263 | ) | 4,007 | 8,455 | (4,346 | ) | 4,109 | 8,141 | (4,391 | ) | 3,750 | 8,455 | (4,346 | ) | 4,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (2 to 25 years) | 876 | (402 | ) | 474 | 865 | (332 | ) | 533 | 878 | (442 | ) | 436 | 865 | (332 | ) | 533 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 12,261 | $ | (5,937 | ) | $ | 6,324 | $ | 12,454 | $ | (5,690 | ) | $ | 6,764 | $ | 12,165 | $ | (6,250 | ) | $ | 5,915 | $ | 12,454 | $ | (5,690 | ) | $ | 6,764 | ||||||||||||||||
The amortization expense for other intangible assets was as follows:
(dollars in millions) | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||
2010 | $ 462 | $ 919 | ||
2009 | 498 | 973 |
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 2009(dollars in millions) $ 446 $ 1,365 496 1,469
Estimated annual amortization expense for other intangible assets is as follows:
Years | (dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | |||||
2010 | $ | 1,866 | $ | 1,830 | |||
2011 | 1,605 | 1,576 | |||||
2012 | 1,273 | 1,259 | |||||
2013 | 1,024 | 1,027 | |||||
2014 | 644 | 669 |
4. | Debt |
Changes to debt during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 are as follows:
(dollars in millions) | Debt Maturing within One Year | Long-term Debt | Total | Debt Maturing within One Year | Long-term Debt | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 | $ | 7,205 | $ | 55,051 | $ | 62,256 | $ | 7,205 | $ | 55,051 | $ | 62,256 | ||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term borrowings and capital leases obligations | (3,802 | ) | (792 | ) | (4,594 | ) | (5,923 | ) | (2,018 | ) | (7,941 | ) | ||||||||||||
Decrease in short-term obligations, excluding current maturities | (97 | ) | – | (97 | ) | (1,097 | ) | – | (1,097 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reclassifications of long-term debt | 4,500 | (4,500 | ) | – | 5,500 | (5,500 | ) | – | ||||||||||||||||
Other | 68 | (165 | ) | (97 | ) | 125 | (173 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 | $ | 7,874 | $ | 49,594 | $ | 57,468 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 | $ | 5,810 | $ | 47,360 | $ | 53,170 | ||||||||||||||||||
During the first half ofnine months ended September 30, 2010, $0.3 billion of 6.125% Verizon New York Inc. debentures, $0.2 billion of 6.375% Verizon North Inc. debentures and $0.2 billion of 6.30% Verizon Northwest Inc. debentures matured and were repaid.
During July 2010, Verizon received approximately $3.1 billion in connection with the completion of the spin-off and merger of Spinco (see Note 2). This special cash payment was subsequently used to redeem $2.0 billion of 7.25% Verizon Communications notes due December 2010 at a redemption price of 102.7% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption, as well as other short-term borrowings.
Verizon Wireless
On June 28, 2010, Verizon Wireless exercised its right to redeem the outstanding $1.0 billion of aggregate floating rate notes due June 2011 at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption. In addition, during the second quarter ofnine months ended September 30, 2010, Verizon Wireless repaid $2.8$4.0 billion of borrowings that were outstanding under a three-year term loan facility, reducing thefacility. No borrowings remain outstanding borrowings under this facility to approximately $1.2 billion at Juneas of September 30, 2010. During July 2010 Verizon Wireless repaid $0.7 billion of borrowings underand this facility reducing the outstanding borrowings under this facility to $0.5 billion.has been cancelled.
Guarantees
We guarantee the debt obligations of GTE Corporation (but not the debt of its subsidiary or affiliate companies) that were issued and outstanding prior to July 1, 2003. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, $1.7 billion principal amount of these obligations remain outstanding.
Debt Covenants
We and our consolidated subsidiaries are in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
Credit Facility
On April 14, 2010, we terminated all commitments under our previous $5.3 billion 364-day credit facility with a syndicate of lenders and entered into a new $6.2 billion three-year credit facility with a group of major financial institutions. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the unused borrowing capacity under the three-year credit facility was approximately $6.1 billion.
5. | Fair Value Measurements |
The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010:
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 (1) | Level 2 (2) | Level 3 (3) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Level 1 (1) | Level 2 (2) | Level 3 (3) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | $ | 220 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 220 | $ | 243 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 243 | ||||||||||||
Fixed income securities | 18 | 226 | – | 244 | 19 | 319 | – | 338 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated businesses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity and other securities | 433 | – | – | 433 | 465 | – | – | 465 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income securities | – | 775 | – | 775 | – | 743 | – | 743 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | – | 373 | – | 373 | – | 465 | – | 465 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency swaps | – | 34 | – | 34 | – | 139 | – | 139 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 671 | $ | 1,408 | $ | – | $ | 2,079 | $ | 727 | $ | 1,666 | $ | – | $ | 2,393 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency swaps | $ | – | $ | 103 | $ | – | $ | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | – | $ | 103 | $ | – | $ | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(2) – observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
(3) – no observable pricing inputs in the market
Equity securities consist of investments in common stock of domestic and international corporations in a variety of industry sectors and are generally measured using quoted prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1.
Fixed income securities consist primarily of investments in U.S. Treasuries and agencies, as well as municipal bonds. We use quoted prices in active markets for our U.S. Treasury securities, and therefore these securities are classified as Level 1. For all other fixed income securities that do not have quoted prices in active markets, we use alternative matrix pricing as a practical expedient resulting in these debt securities being classified as Level 2.
Derivative contracts primarily consist of interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps. Derivative contracts are valued using models based on readily observable market parameters for all substantial terms of our derivative contracts and thus are classified within Level 2. We use mid-market pricing for fair value measurements of our derivative instruments.
We recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers within the fair value hierarchy during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
Fair Value of Short-term and Long-term Debt
The fair value of our short-term and long-term debt, excluding capital leases, is determined based on market quotes for similar terms and maturities or future cash flows discounted at current rates. The fair value of our short-term and long-term debt, excluding capital leases, was as follows:
At June 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At September 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
Short- and long-term debt, excluding capital leases | $ | 57,099 | $ | 64,061 | $ | 61,859 | $ | 67,359 | $ | 52,815 | $ | 61,193 | $ | 61,859 | $ | 67,359 |
Derivative Instruments
We have enteredenter into derivative transactions primarily to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, equity and commodity prices. We employ risk management strategies, which may include the use of a variety of derivatives including cross currency swaps, foreign currency and prepaid forwards and collars, interest rate and commodity swap agreements and interest rate locks. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes.
We measure all derivatives, including derivatives embedded in other financial instruments, at fair value and recognize them as either assets or liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments not qualifying as hedges or any ineffective portion of hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments used effectively as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged item. Changes in the fair value of the effective portions of cash flow hedges are reported in Other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in earnings when the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
Interest Rate Swaps
We have entered into domestic interest rate swaps to achieve a targeted mix of fixed and variable rate debt, where we principally receive fixed rates and pay variable rates based on London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).Rate. These swaps are designated as fair value hedges and hedge against changes in the fair value of our debt portfolio. We record the interest rate swaps at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded to Interest expense, which are offset by changes in the fair value of the debt due to changes in interest rates. The fair value of these contracts was $373$465 million and $171 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and are primarily included in Other assets and Long-term debt. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the total notional amount of these interest rate swaps was $6.0 billion.
Forward Interest Rate Swaps
In order to manage our exposure to future interest rate changes, beginning in late September 2010 through October 25, 2010, we entered into forward interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $1,250 million. We have designated these contracts as cash flow hedges.
Cross Currency Swaps
Verizon Wireless has entered into cross currency swaps designated as cash flow hedges to exchange approximately $2.4 billion of the net proceeds from a debt offering of British Pound Sterling and Euro denominated debt into U.S. dollars and to fix our future interest and principal payments in U.S. dollars, as well as mitigate the impact of foreign currency transaction gains or losses. The fair value of these swaps included in Other assets and Other liabilities was approximately $34$139 million and $103 million, respectively, at June 30, 2010. The fair value of these swaps included in Other assets was approximately $315 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.2009, respectively. During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, a pretax gain of $207 million and a pretax loss of $239 million and $383$176 million, respectively, was recognized in Other comprehensive income, a portion of which was reclassified to Other income and (expense), net to offset the related pretax foreign currency transaction gain or loss on the underlying debt obligations.
Prepaid Forward Agreements
During the first quarter of 2009, we entered into a privately negotiated prepaid forward agreement for 14 million shares of Verizon common stock at a cost of approximately $390 million. We terminated the prepaid forward agreement with respect to 5 million shares of Verizon common stockthe shares during the fourth quarter of 2009 and the remaining 9 million shares of Verizon common stockthe shares during the first quarter of 2010, which resulted in the delivery of those shares to Verizon upon termination.
6. | Stock-Based Compensation |
Verizon Communications Long-Term Incentive Plan
The 2009 Verizon Communications Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) permits the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance stock units and other awards. The maximum number of shares available for awards from the Plan is 115119.6 million shares.
Restricted Stock Units
The Plan provides for grants of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) that generally vest at the end of the third year after the grant. The RSUs outstanding at January 1, 2010 are classified as liability awards because the RSUs will be paid in cash upon vesting. The RSU award liability is measured at its fair value at the end of each reporting period and, therefore, will fluctuate based on the performance of Verizon common stock. The RSUs granted during 2010 are classified as equity awards because these RSUs will be paid in Verizon common stock upon vesting. Compensation expense for RSUs classified as equity awards is measured based on the market price of Verizon common stock at the date of grant and is recognized over the vesting period. Dividend equivalent units are also paid to participants at the time the RSU award is paid, and in the same proportion as the RSU award.
The following table summarizes Verizon’s Restricted Stock Unit activity:
(shares in thousands) | Restricted Stock Units | Weighted-Average Fair Value | Restricted Stock Units | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 19,443 | $ | 35.50 | 19,443 | $ | 35.50 | ||||||||
Granted | 6,431 | 29.15 | 8,073 | 29.81 | ||||||||||
Payments | (6,746 | ) | 38.00 | (6,752 | ) | 38.00 | ||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited | (71 | ) | 32.51 | (104 | ) | 32.15 | ||||||||
Outstanding, June 30, 2010 | 19,057 | 32.48 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 | 20,660 | 32.47 | ||||||||||||
Performance Stock Units
The Plan also provides for grants of Performance Stock Units (PSUs) that generally vest at the end of the third year after the grant. As defined by the Plan, the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors determines the number of PSUs a participant earns based on the extent to which the corresponding goal has been achieved over the three-year performance cycle. All payments are subject to approval by the Human Resources Committee. The PSUs are classified as liability awards because the PSU awards are paid in cash upon vesting. The PSU award liability is measured at its fair value at the end of each reporting period and, therefore, will fluctuate based on the price of Verizon common stock as well as performance relative to the targets. Dividend equivalent units are also paid to participants at the time that the PSU award is determined and paid, and in the same proportion as the PSU award.
The following table summarizes Verizon’s Performance Stock Unit activity:
(shares in thousands) | Performance Stock Units | Weighted-Average Fair Value | Performance Stock Units | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 29,895 | $ | 35.52 | 29,895 | $ | 35.52 | ||||||||
Granted | 14,236 | 31.64 | 16,774 | 31.75 | ||||||||||
Payments | (14,364 | ) | 38.00 | (14,364 | ) | 38.00 | ||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited | (180 | ) | 34.82 | (230 | ) | 34.07 | ||||||||
Outstanding, June 30, 2010 | 29,587 | 32.46 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 | 32,075 | 32.45 | ||||||||||||
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of Verizon’s RSUs and PSUs was approximately $439$391 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years.
Stock Options
The Plan provides for grants of stock options to participants at an option price per share of 100% of the fair market value of Verizon common stock on the date of grant. Each grant has a 10-year life, vesting equally over a three-year period, starting at the date of the grant. We have not granted new stock options since 2004.
The following table summarizes Verizon’s stock option activity:
(shares in thousands) | Stock Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Stock Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 103,620 | $ | 46.29 | 107,765 | $ | 44.52 | ||||||||
Exercised | (2 | ) | 30.04 | |||||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited | (46,729 | ) | 46.66 | (49,032 | ) | 44.85 | ||||||||
Outstanding, June 30, 2010 | 56,891 | 46.00 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 | 58,731 | 44.24 | ||||||||||||
All stock options outstanding at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 were exercisable.
Verizon Wireless Long-Term Incentive Plan
The 2000 Verizon Wireless Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Wireless Plan) provides compensation opportunities to eligible employees of Verizon Wireless (the Partnership). The Wireless Plan provides rewards that are tied to the long-term performance of the Partnership. Under the Wireless Plan, Value Appreciation Rights (VARs) were granted to eligible employees. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, all VARs were fully vested.
The following table summarizes the Value Appreciation Rights activity:
(shares in thousands) | Value Appreciation Rights | Weighted-Average Fair Value | Value Appreciation Rights | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year | 16,591 | $ | 16.54 | 16,591 | $ | 16.54 | ||||||||
Exercised | (3,210 | ) | 25.31 | (4,456 | ) | 25.48 | ||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited | (19 | ) | 16.82 | (51 | ) | 21.84 | ||||||||
Outstanding, June 30, 2010 | 13,362 | 14.43 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2010 | 12,084 | 13.22 | ||||||||||||
7. | Employee Benefits |
We maintain non-contributory defined benefit pension plans for many of our employees. In addition, we maintain postretirement health care and life insurance plans for our retirees and their dependents, which are both contributory and non-contributory, and include a limit on the Company’s share of the cost for certain recent and future retirees.
Net Periodic Benefit (Income) Cost
The following table summarizes the benefit (income) cost related to our pension and postretirement health care and life insurance plans:
(dollars in millions) | Pension | Health Care and Life | Pension | Health Care and Life | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 86 | $ | 96 | $ | 75 | $ | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 447 | 481 | 406 | 441 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (642 | ) | (734 | ) | (75 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 26 | 28 | 94 | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss, net | 57 | 28 | 44 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit (income) cost | (26 | ) | (101 | ) | 544 | 604 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement loss | 873 | 610 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 847 | $ | 509 | $ | 544 | $ | 604 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Pension | Health Care and Life | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 91 | $ | 96 | $ | 78 | $ | 78 | $ | 268 | $ | 288 | $ | 231 | $ | 234 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 453 | 481 | 412 | 442 | 1,353 | 1,443 | 1,230 | 1,324 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (653 | ) | (735 | ) | (76 | ) | (75 | ) | (1,948 | ) | (2,203 | ) | (227 | ) | (227 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 28 | 28 | 94 | 100 | 82 | 84 | 282 | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss, net | 60 | 28 | 44 | 59 | 177 | 84 | 132 | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit (income) cost | (21 | ) | (102 | ) | 552 | 604 | (68 | ) | (304 | ) | 1,648 | 1,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Termination benefits | 681 | – | – | – | 681 | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement loss | 80 | 416 | – | – | 1,089 | 1,026 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment loss and other, net | 173 | – | 386 | – | 173 | – | 386 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 934 | 416 | 386 | – | 1,943 | 1,026 | 386 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 913 | $ | 314 | $ | 938 | $ | 604 | $ | 1,875 | $ | 722 | $ | 2,034 | $ | 1,811 | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Pension | Health Care and Life | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 182 | $ | 192 | $ | 156 | $ | 156 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 906 | 962 | 824 | 883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (1,306 | ) | (1,469 | ) | (152 | ) | (151 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 56 | 56 | 188 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss, net | 120 | 56 | 88 | 119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit (income) cost | (42 | ) | (203 | ) | 1,104 | 1,207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination benefits | 681 | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement loss | 216 | 416 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment loss and other, net | 173 | – | 386 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 1,070 | 416 | 386 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,028 | $ | 213 | $ | 1,490 | $ | 1,207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance, Pension and Benefit Charges
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded severance, pension and benefits charges of $873 million and $3,323 million, respectively. The charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, included non-cash pension settlement losses of $873 million and $1,089 million, respectively, related to employees who received lump-sum distributions, primarily resulting from our previously announced separation plans.
In April 2010, we reached an agreement with certain unions on temporary enhancements to the separation programs contained in their existing collective bargaining agreements. These temporary enhancements were intended to help address a previously declared surplus of employees and to help reduce the need for layoffs. Accordingly, during the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded severance, pension and benefits charges of $2,234 million associated with the approximately 11,000 union-represented employees who volunteered for the incentive offer. Included in theThese charges wereincluded $994 million for severance, $681 million for special termination benefits, as well as $173 million for pension curtailment losses and $386 million for postretirement curtailment losses of $559 million asthat were due to the workforce reductions which caused the elimination of a significant amount of future service requiring us to recognize a portion of prior service costs and actuarial losses. The charges also included $994 million of severance charges and $681 million of special termination benefits for planned workforce reductions of approximately 11,000 employees.service.
During the three and sixnine months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded non-cash pension settlement losses of $80 million and $216 million, respectively, related to employees who received lump-sum distributions, primarily resulting from our previously announced separation plans in which prescribed payment thresholds were reached.
During the three and six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we recorded non-cash pension settlement losses of $416$610 million and $1,026 million, respectively, related to employees who received lump-sum distributions primarily resulting from our previously announced separation plans in which prescribed payment thresholds were reached.
Severance Payments
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we paid severance benefits of $98$710 million and $262$972 million, respectively. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we had a remaining severance liability of $2,422$1,708 million, a portion of which includes future contractual payments to employees separated as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
Employer Contributions
During the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we contributed $21$2 million to our qualified pension trusts, $24 million to our nonqualified pension plans and $324$288 million to our other postretirement benefit plans. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we contributed $1$3 million to our qualified pension trusts, $71$95 million to our nonqualified pension plans and $770$1,058 million to our other postretirement benefit plans. The anticipated qualified pension trust contributions for 2010 disclosed in Verizon’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 have not changed. Our estimate of the amount and timing of required qualified pension trust contributions for 2010 is based on current proposed Internal Revenue Service regulations under the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
Medicare Part D Subsidy
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, both of which became law in March 2010 (collectively the Health Care Act), beginning in 2013, Verizon and other companies that receive a subsidy under Medicare Part D to provide retiree prescription drug coverage will no longer receive a federal income tax deduction for the expenses incurred in connection with providing the subsidized coverage to the extent of the subsidy received. Because future anticipated retiree prescription drug plan liabilities and related subsidies are already reflected in Verizon’s financial statements, this change requiresrequired Verizon to reduce the value of the related tax benefits recognized in its financial statements in the period during which the Health Care Act was enacted. As a result, Verizon recorded a one-time, non-cash income tax charge of $962 million in the first quarter of 2010 to reflect the impact of this change.
8. | Equity and Comprehensive Income |
Equity
Changes in the components of Total equity were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Attributable to Verizon | Noncontrolling Interest | Total Equity | Attributable to Verizon | Noncontrolling Interest | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 41,606 | $ | 42,761 | $ | 84,367 | $ | 41,606 | $ | 42,761 | $ | 84,367 | ||||||||||||
Spin-off of local exchange businesses and | 236 | – | 236 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted balance at beginning of period | 41,842 | 42,761 | 84,603 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 211 | 3,620 | 3,831 | 1,092 | 5,659 | 6,751 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 339 | (32 | ) | 307 | 1,408 | (31 | ) | 1,377 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 550 | 3,588 | 4,138 | 2,500 | 5,628 | 8,128 | ||||||||||||||||||
Contributed capital | (2,187 | ) | – | (2,187 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared | (2,686 | ) | – | (2,686 | ) | (4,063 | ) | – | (4,063 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Common stock in treasury (Note 5) | (277 | ) | – | (277 | ) | (276 | ) | – | (276 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Distributions and other | 61 | (1,130 | ) | (1,069 | ) | 101 | (1,682 | ) | (1,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 39,254 | $ | 45,219 | $ | 84,473 | $ | 37,917 | $ | 46,707 | $ | 84,624 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests included in our condensed consolidated financial statements primarily consist of Vodafone Group Plc.’s 45% ownership interest in our Verizon Wireless joint venture. The change in Contributed capital during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflects the spin-off of Spinco (see Note 2).
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net income. Significant changes in the components of Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax expense (benefit), are described below.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,547 | $ | 3,160 | $ | 3,831 | $ | 6,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 2,920 | $ | 2,887 | $ | 6,751 | $ | 9,257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Taxes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (257 | ) | 188 | (451 | ) | 30 | 350 | 134 | (101 | ) | 164 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges | (25 | ) | 47 | (22 | ) | 85 | – | (5 | ) | (22 | ) | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities | (35 | ) | 39 | (19 | ) | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities | 53 | 65 | 34 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans | 619 | 371 | 831 | 491 | 666 | 490 | 1,497 | 981 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income attributable to Verizon | 302 | 645 | 339 | 630 | 1,069 | 684 | 1,408 | 1,314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | (36 | ) | 46 | (32 | ) | 82 | 1 | (7 | ) | (31 | ) | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income | $ | 1,813 | $ | 3,851 | $ | 4,138 | $ | 7,082 | $ | 3,990 | $ | 3,564 | $ | 8,128 | $ | 10,646 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest | $ | 1,709 | $ | 1,723 | $ | 3,588 | $ | 3,324 | $ | 2,040 | $ | 1,704 | $ | 5,628 | $ | 5,028 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Verizon | 104 | 2,128 | 550 | 3,758 | 1,950 | 1,860 | 2,500 | 5,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income | $ | 1,813 | $ | 3,851 | $ | 4,138 | $ | 7,082 | $ | 3,990 | $ | 3,564 | $ | 8,128 | $ | 10,646 | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest primarily reflects activity related to the cross currency swaps (see Note 5).
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | At June 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | $ | 563 | $ | 1,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges | 15 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities | 31 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans | (11,749 | ) | (12,580 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | $ | (11,140 | ) | $ | (11,479 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest primarily reflects activity related to the cross currency swaps (see Note 5).
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
The change in Foreign currency translation adjustments for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 was primarily driven by the strengtheningdevaluation of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar against the Euro.dollar.
Unrealized Gain on Marketable Securities
Gross unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 were not significant.
Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans
The change in Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 was attributable to pension settlement losses and the amortization of prior service cost and actuarial losses. The change was also impacted by the curtailment losses and termination benefits associated with the voluntary incentive program for union-represented employees recorded in the second quarter of 2010 (see Note 7). We also recorded a reduction to the beginning balance of Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $0.2 billion in connection with the spin-off of Spinco (see Note 2).
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:
(dollars in millions) | At September 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | $ | 913 | $ | 1,014 | ||||
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges | 15 | 37 | ||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities | 84 | 50 | ||||||
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plans | (10,847 | ) | (12,580 | ) | ||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | $ | (9,835 | ) | $ | (11,479 | ) | ||
9. | Segment Information |
Reportable Segments
We have two reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and services. We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on segment operating income, consistent with the chief operating decision maker’s assessment of segment performance.
Corporate, eliminations and other includes unallocated corporate expenses, intersegment eliminations recorded in consolidation, the results of other businesses, such as our investments in unconsolidated businesses, lease financing, as well as divested operations and other adjustments and gains and losses that are not allocated in assessing segment performance due to their non-operational nature. Although such transactions are excluded from the business segment results, they are included in reported consolidated earnings. Gains and losses that are not individually significant are included in all segment results, as these items are included in the chief operating decision maker’s assessment of segment performance.
In order to comply with regulatory conditions related to the acquisition of Alltel in January 2009, Verizon Wireless divested overlapping properties in 105 operating markets in 24 states during the first half of 2010. In addition, on July 1, 2010, certain of Verizon’s local exchange and related landline assets in 14 states were spun off (see Note 2). Accordingly, Domestic Wireless and Wireline results from these operations have been reclassified to Corporate and Other to reflect comparable segment operating results.
Our segments and their principal activities consist of the following:
Segment | Description | |
Domestic Wireless | Domestic Wireless’ products and services include wireless voice and data services and equipment sales across the U.S. | |
Wireline | Wireline’s communications products and services include voice, Internet access, broadband video and data, next generation Internet protocol |
The following table provides operating financial information for our two reportable segments:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
External Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | ||||||||||||||||
Service revenue | $ | 14,029 | $ | 13,330 | $ | 27,854 | $ | 26,387 | ||||||||
Equipment and other | 1,954 | 2,125 | 3,886 | 4,164 | ||||||||||||
Total Domestic Wireless | 15,983 | 15,455 | 31,740 | 30,551 | ||||||||||||
Wireline | ||||||||||||||||
Mass Markets | 4,616 | 4,626 | 9,198 | 9,212 | ||||||||||||
Global Enterprise | 4,036 | 4,010 | 8,029 | 8,059 | ||||||||||||
Global Wholesale | 1,910 | 2,126 | 3,921 | 4,239 | ||||||||||||
Other | 212 | 398 | 504 | 889 | ||||||||||||
Total Wireline | 10,774 | 11,160 | 21,652 | 22,399 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 26,757 | 26,615 | 53,392 | 52,950 | ||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | 16 | 246 | 294 | 502 | ||||||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 26,773 | $ | 26,861 | $ | 53,686 | $ | 53,452 | ||||||||
Intersegment Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 23 | $ | 25 | $ | 49 | $ | 51 | ||||||||
Wireline | 338 | 328 | 692 | 656 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 361 | 353 | 741 | 707 | ||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | (361 | ) | (353 | ) | (741 | ) | (707 | ) | ||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | ||||||||
Total Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 16,006 | $ | 15,480 | $ | 31,789 | $ | 30,602 | ||||||||
Wireline | 11,112 | 11,488 | 22,344 | 23,055 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 27,118 | 26,968 | 54,133 | 53,657 | ||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | (345 | ) | (107 | ) | (447 | ) | (205 | ) | ||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 26,773 | $ | 26,861 | $ | 53,686 | $ | 53,452 | ||||||||
Operating Income | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 4,842 | $ | 4,459 | $ | 9,396 | $ | 8,730 | ||||||||
Wireline | 214 | 555 | 386 | 1,246 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 5,056 | 5,014 | 9,782 | 9,976 | ||||||||||||
Reconciling items | (3,017 | ) | (596 | ) | (3,392 | ) | (864 | ) | ||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 2,039 | $ | 4,418 | $ | 6,390 | $ | 9,112 | ||||||||
(dollars in millions) | At June 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ 132,875 | $ 135,162 | ||||||
Wireline | 92,529 | 91,778 | ||||||
Total segments | 225,404 | 226,940 | ||||||
Reconciling items | 847 | 311 | ||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ 226,251 | $ 227,251 | ||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
External Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | ||||||||||||||||
Service revenue | $ | 14,149 | $ | 13,152 | $ | 41,412 | $ | 38,858 | ||||||||
Equipment and other | 2,077 | 2,177 | 5,806 | 6,168 | ||||||||||||
Total Domestic Wireless | 16,226 | 15,329 | 47,218 | 45,026 | ||||||||||||
Wireline | ||||||||||||||||
Mass Markets | 4,070 | 4,047 | 12,164 | 12,064 | ||||||||||||
Global Enterprise | 3,927 | 3,958 | 11,705 | 11,753 | ||||||||||||
Global Wholesale | 1,774 | 2,008 | 5,457 | 5,982 | ||||||||||||
Other | 202 | 338 | 641 | 1,128 | ||||||||||||
Total Wireline | 9,973 | 10,351 | 29,967 | 30,927 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 26,199 | 25,680 | 77,185 | 75,953 | ||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | 285 | 1,585 | 2,985 | 4,764 | ||||||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 26,484 | $ | 27,265 | $ | 80,170 | $ | 80,717 | ||||||||
Intersegment Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 24 | $ | 2 | $ | 41 | $ | 24 | ||||||||
Wireline | 313 | 316 | 971 | 943 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 337 | 318 | 1,012 | 967 | ||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | (337 | ) | (318 | ) | (1,012 | ) | (967 | ) | ||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | ||||||||
Total Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 16,250 | $ | 15,331 | $ | 47,259 | $ | 45,050 | ||||||||
Wireline | 10,286 | 10,667 | 30,938 | 31,870 | ||||||||||||
Total segments | 26,536 | 25,998 | 78,197 | 76,920 | ||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | (52 | ) | 1,267 | 1,973 | 3,797 | |||||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 26,484 | $ | 27,265 | $ | 80,170 | $ | 80,717 | ||||||||
Operating Income | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 4,854 | $ | 4,245 | $ | 13,870 | $ | 12,556 | ||||||||
Wireline | 19 | 191 | (3 | ) | 884 | |||||||||||
Total segments | 4,873 | 4,436 | 13,867 | 13,440 | ||||||||||||
Reconciling items | (1,126 | ) | (450 | ) | (3,730 | ) | (342 | ) | ||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 3,747 | $ | 3,986 | $ | 10,137 | $ | 13,098 | ||||||||
(dollars in millions) | At September 30, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 135,167 | $ | 135,162 | ||||||||||||
Wireline | 86,981 | 91,778 | ||||||||||||||
Total segments | 222,148 | 226,940 | ||||||||||||||
Reconciling items | (1,296 | ) | 311 | |||||||||||||
Total consolidated – reported | $ | 220,852 | $ | 227,251 | ||||||||||||
A reconciliation of the total of the reportable segments’ Operatingoperating revenues to consolidated Operating revenues is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total segment operating revenues | $ | 26,757 | $ | 26,615 | $ | 53,392 | $ | 52,950 | $ | 26,199 | $ | 25,680 | $ | 77,185 | $ | 75,953 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue adjustment (Note 1) | (268 | ) | – | (268 | ) | – | – | 22 | (235 | ) | 51 | |||||||||||||||||||
Impact of divested operations (Note 2) | – | 1,331 | 2,407 | 4,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other | 284 | 246 | 562 | 502 | 285 | 232 | 813 | 704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated operating revenues | $ | 26,773 | $ | 26,861 | $ | 53,686 | $ | 53,452 | $ | 26,484 | $ | 27,265 | $ | 80,170 | $ | 80,717 | ||||||||||||||
A reconciliation of the total of the reportable segments’ operating income to consolidated Income before (provision) benefitprovision for income taxes is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total segment operating income | $ | 5,056 | $ | 5,014 | $ | 9,782 | $ | 9,976 | $ | 4,873 | $ | 4,436 | $ | 13,867 | $ | 13,440 | ||||||||||||||||
Severance, pension and benefit charges (Note 7) | (2,314 | ) | (416 | ) | (2,450 | ) | (416 | ) | (873 | ) | (610 | ) | (3,323 | ) | (1,026 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Impact of divested operations (Note 2) | – | 460 | 755 | 1,404 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue adjustment (Note 1) | (268 | ) | – | (268 | ) | – | – | 22 | (235 | ) | 51 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Merger integration and acquisition related charges (Note 2) | (187 | ) | (181 | ) | (292 | ) | (427 | ) | (159 | ) | (277 | ) | (451 | ) | (704 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Access line spin-off related charges (Note 2) | (195 | ) | – | (340 | ) | – | (67 | ) | (62 | ) | (407 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other | (53 | ) | 1 | (42 | ) | (21 | ) | (27 | ) | 17 | (69 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated operating income | 2,039 | 4,418 | 6,390 | 9,112 | 3,747 | 3,986 | 10,137 | 13,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses | 121 | 128 | 254 | 256 | 141 | 166 | 395 | 422 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income and (expense), net | 17 | 11 | 62 | 64 | (50 | ) | 13 | 12 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (679 | ) | (787 | ) | (1,359 | ) | (1,712 | ) | (597 | ) | (704 | ) | (1,956 | ) | (2,416 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income Before (Provision) Benefit For Income Taxes | $ | 1,498 | $ | 3,770 | $ | 5,347 | $ | 7,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income Before Provision For Income Taxes | $ | 3,241 | $ | 3,461 | $ | 8,588 | $ | 11,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
We generally account for intersegment sales of products and services and asset transfers at current market prices. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total operating revenues during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009.
10. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Several state and federal regulatory proceedings may require our telephone operations to pay penalties or to refund to customers a portion of the revenues collected in the current and prior periods. There are also various legal actions pending to which we are a party and claims that, if asserted, may lead to other legal actions. We have established reserves for specific liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal actions, including environmental matters that we currently deem to be probable and estimable. We do not expect that the ultimate resolution of pending regulatory and legal matters in future periods, including the Hicksville matter described below, will have a material effect on our financial condition, but it could have a material effect on our results of operations for a given reporting period.
During 2003, under a government-approved plan, remediation commenced at the site of a former Sylvania facility in Hicksville, New York that processed nuclear fuel rods in the 1950s and 1960s. Remediation beyond original expectations proved to be necessary and a reassessment of the anticipated remediation costs was conducted. A reassessment of costs related to remediation efforts at several other former facilities was also undertaken. In September 2005, the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) accepted the Hicksville site into the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. This may result in the ACE performing some or all of the remediation effort for the Hicksville site with a corresponding decrease in costs to Verizon. To the extent that the ACE assumes responsibility for remedial work at the Hicksville site, an adjustment to a reserve previously established for the remediation may be made. Adjustments to the reserve may also be made based upon actual conditions discovered during the remediation at this or any other site requiring remediation.
In connection with the execution of agreements for the sales of businesses and investments, Verizon ordinarily provides representations and warranties to the purchasers pertaining to a variety of nonfinancial matters, such as ownership of the securities being sold, as well as indemnity from certain financial losses. From time to time, counterparties may make claims under these provisions, and Verizon will seek to defend against those claims and resolve them in the ordinary course of business.
Subsequent to the sale of Verizon Information Services Canada in 2004, we continue to provide a guarantee to publish directories, which was issued when the directory business was purchased in 2001 and had a 30-year term (before extensions). The preexisting guarantee continues, without modification, despite the subsequent sale of Verizon Information Services Canada and the spin-off of our domestic print and Internet yellow pages directories business. The possible financial impact of the guarantee, which is not expected to be adverse, cannot be reasonably estimated sinceas a variety of the potential outcomes available under the guarantee result in costs and revenues or benefits that may offset each other. In addition, performance under the guarantee is not likely.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview |
Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon, or the Company), is one of the world’s leading providers of communications services. Our domestic wireless business, operating as Verizon Wireless, provides wireless voice and data products and services across the United States (U.S.) using one of the most extensive and reliable wireless networks. Our wireline business provides communications products and services, including voice, broadband data and video services, network access, long distance and other communications products and services, and also owns and operates one of the most expansive end-to-end global Internet Protocol (IP) networks. Stressing diversity and commitment to the communities in which we operate, weWe have a highly diverse workforce of approximately 210,800195,100 employees as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
In the sections that follow, we provide information about the important aspects of our operations and investments, both at the consolidated and segment levels, and discuss our results of operations, financial position and sources and uses of cash. In addition, we highlight key trends and uncertainties to the extent practicable. We also monitor several key economic indicators as well as the state of the economy in general primarily in the United StatesU.S. where the majority of our operations are located for purposes of evaluating our operating results and assessing the potential impacts of these factors on our businesses. While most key economic indicators, including gross domestic product, affect our operations to some degree, we historically have noted higher correlations to non-farm employment, personal consumption expenditures and capital spending, as well as more general economic indicators such as inflationary or recessionary trends and housing starts.
On May 13, 2009, we announced plans to spin off a newly formed subsidiary of Verizon (Spinco) to our stockholders and for Spinco to merge with Frontier Communications Corporation (Frontier) immediately following the spin-off pursuant to a definitive agreement with Frontier, with Frontier to be the surviving corporation. At the time of the spin-off and the merger, Spinco held defined assets and liabilities of the local exchange business and related landline activities of Verizon in Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin, and in portions of California bordering Arizona, Nevada and Oregon, including Internet access and long distance services and broadband video provided to designated customers in those areas. On July 1, 2010, after receiving regulatory approval, we completed the spin-off of the shares of Spinco to Verizon stockholders and the merger of Spinco with Frontier, resulting in Verizon stockholders collectively owning approximately 68 percent of Frontier’s equity which was outstanding immediately following the merger. Frontier issued approximately 678.5 million shares of Frontier common stock in the aggregate to Verizon stockholders in the merger, and Verizon stockholders received one share of Frontier common stock for every 4.165977 shares of Verizon common stock they owned as of June 7, 2010. Verizon stockholders have received cash in lieu of any fraction of a share of Frontier common stock to which they otherwise were entitled. At the time of the spin-off and the merger, Spinco held defined assets and liabilities of the local exchange business and related landline activities of Verizon in Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin, and in portions of California bordering Arizona, Nevada and Oregon, including Internet access and long distance services and broadband video provided to designated customers in those areas. The merger resulted in Frontier acquiring approximately 4 million access lines and certain related businesses from Verizon, which collectively generated annual revenues of approximately $4 billion for ourVerizon’s Wireline segment during 2009.2009 and approximately $1.7 billion of revenue for Verizon’s Wireline segment during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
As a condition of the regulatory approvals by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to complete the acquisition of Alltel Corporation (Alltel) in January 2009, Verizon Wireless was required to divest overlapping properties in 105 operating markets in 24 states (Alltel Divestiture Markets). On May 8, 2009, Verizon Wireless entered into a definitive agreement with AT&T Mobility LLC (AT&T Mobility), a subsidiary of AT&T Inc. (AT&T), pursuant to which AT&T Mobility agreed to acquire 79 of the 105 Alltel Divestiture Markets, including licenses and network assets, for approximately $2.4 billion in cash. On June 9, 2009, Verizon Wireless entered into a definitive agreement with Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (ATN), pursuant to which ATN agreed to acquire the remaining 26 Alltel Divestiture Markets, including licenses and network assets, for $200 million in cash. During the second quarter of 2010, Verizon Wireless received the necessary regulatory approvals and completed both transactions. TheAs a result of these transactions, the Verizon Wireless customer base was reduced by approximately 2.1 million customers, partially offset by certain adjustments.
Our results of operations, financial position and sources and uses of cash in the current and future periods reflect our focus on the following strategic imperatives:
Revenue Growth – To generate revenue growth we are devoting our resources to higher growth markets such as the wireless voice and data markets, the broadband and video markets, and the provision of strategic services to business markets, rather than to the traditional wireline voice market. During the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, consolidated revenue decreased 0.3%2.9% compared to the similar period in 2009 primarily due to the sale of divested operations as well as lower revenue in the Wireline segment resulting from switched access line losses and decreased minutes of use (MOUs), partially offset by higher revenues in our growth markets. We continue developing and marketing innovative product bundles to include local, long distance, wireless, broadband data and video services for consumer, business and government customers. We anticipate that these efforts will help counter the effects of competition and technology substitution that have resulted in access line losses, and will enable us to grow consolidated revenues.
Market Share Gains – In our wireless business, our goal is to continue to be the market leader in providing wireless voice and data communication services in the U.S. We are focused on providing the highest network reliability and innovative products and services. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we invested $7.7 billion in capital expenditures, which included the continued investment in the build-out of our fourth generation network based on Long-Term Evolution technology. As the demand for wireless data services grows, we continue to expand our offerings of data services and devices with advanced capabilities for both consumer and business customers and increase our data revenues. On October 6, 2010, we announced that we will launch our 4G Long-Term Evolution technology (LTE) network in 38 major metropolitan areas and in more than 60 commercial airports by the end of 2010. In our wireline business, our goal is to become the leading broadband provider in every market in which we operate. We are focused on providing the highest network reliability and innovative products and services. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we invested $11.8 billion in capital expenditures.
In Domestic Wireless:
as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010 as compared to JuneSeptember 30, 2009, total customers increased 5.0%7.1% to 92.193.2 million; and
during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 as compared to the similar period in 2009, total data average revenue per customer per month (ARPU) increased by 16.1%17.6% to $17.37.$18.20.
During the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, in Wireline:
we added 28,00061,000 net wireline broadband connections, including 196,000226,000 net new FiOS Internet subscribers,
for a total of 9.38.3 million connections, including 3.83.9 million FiOS Internet subscribers;
we added 174,000204,000 net new FiOS TV subscribers, for a total of 3.23.3 million FiOS TV subscribers; and
total broadband and video revenues exceededwere approximately $1.8 billion.
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we passed 15.915.4 million premises with our high-capacity fiber optics network operated under the FiOS service mark. With FiOS, we have created the opportunity to increase revenue per customer as well as improve Wireline profitability as the traditional fixed-line telephone business continues to decline due to customer migration to wireless, cable and other newer technologies.
We are also focused on gaining market share in our enterprise business through the deployment of strategic enterprise service offerings, including expansion of our Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and international Ethernet capabilities, the introduction of video and web-based conferencing capabilities, and enhancements to our virtual private network portfolio. During the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, revenues from strategic enterprise services grew 6.2%6.9% compared to the similar period in 2009.
Profitability Improvement – Our goal is to increase operating income and margins. Strong wireless data and FiOS revenue growth continue to positively impact operating results. In addition, we have seen early indications of an economic recovery, particularlywhile revenues in the business markets.market continue to be affected by macro-economic pressures, we are seeing some signs of stability. A sustained economic recovery should positively impact our revenue performance in future quarters. However, we remain focused on cost controls with the objective of driving efficiencies to offset business volume declines, as we expect the pressures of the economy to continue throughout the remainder of 2010.
Operational Efficiency – While focusing resources on revenue growth and market share gains, we are continually challenging our management team to lower expenses, particularly through technology-assisted productivity improvements, including self-service initiatives. These and other efforts, such as real estate consolidation, call center routing improvements, a centralized shared services organization, information technology and marketing efforts, have led to changes in our cost structure with a goal of maintaining and improving operating income margins. Through our deployment of the FiOS network, we expect to realize savings annually in our ongoing operating expenses as a result of efficiencies gained from fiber network facilities.
Customer Service – Our goal is to be the leading company in customer service in every market we serve. We view superior product offerings and customer service experiences as a competitive differentiator and a catalyst to growing revenues and gaining market share. We are committed to providing high-quality customer service and continually monitor customer satisfaction in all facets of our business. Verizon Wireless ranked highest among wireless providers in small to mid-sized business customer satisfaction in the J.D. Power and Associates 2010 U.S. Business Wireless Satisfaction Study released in June.
Performance-Based Culture – We embrace a culture of accountability based on individual and team objectives that are performance-based and tied to Verizon’s strategic imperatives. Key objectives of our compensation programs are pay-for-performance and the alignment of executives’ and stockholders’ long-term interests. We also employ a highly diverse workforce as respect for diversity is an integral part of Verizon’s culture and a critical element of our competitive success.
Trends
Information related to trends affecting our business was disclosed in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,While we have continued to experienceexperienced significant growth in our wireless reseller customer base and expect this trend induring the first half of 2010, the number of net reseller customer additions toin the third quarter was comparatively lower than the first half of the year on a quarterly basis. We cannot predict at this time whether this third quarter trend will continue through the end of the year. There have been no other significant changes to previously discussed trends.
Consolidated Results of Operations |
In this section, we discuss our overall results of operations and highlight items of a non-operational nature that are not included in our business segment results. We have two reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and services. Our segments are Domestic Wireless and Wireline. In the “Segment Results of Operations” section, we review the performance of our two reportable segments.
Corporate, eliminations and other includes unallocated corporate expenses, intersegment eliminations recorded in consolidation, the results of other businesses such as our investments in unconsolidated businesses, lease financing, as well as divested operations and other adjustments and gains and losses that are not allocated in assessing segment performance due to their non-operational nature. Although such transactions are excluded from the business segment results, they are included in reported consolidated earnings. Gains and losses that are not individually significant are included in all segment results as these items are included in the chief operating decision maker’s assessment of segment performance. We believe that this presentation assists readers in better understanding our results of operations and trends from period to period.
The following discussion includes the results of operations of the Alltel Divestiture Markets through the date the divestitures were completed as well as the operations acquired by Frontier, which we owned through June 30, 2010.2010 (see “Recent Developments”).
Consolidated Revenues |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service revenue | $ | 14,046 | $ | 13,349 | 5.2 | $ | 27,891 | $ | 26,424 | 5.6 | $ | 14,168 | $ | 13,149 | 7.7 | $ | 41,436 | $ | 38,863 | 6.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment and other | 1,960 | 2,131 | (8.0 | ) | 3,898 | 4,178 | (6.7 | ) | 2,082 | 2,182 | (4.6 | ) | 5,823 | 6,187 | (5.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 16,006 | 15,480 | 3.4 | 31,789 | 30,602 | 3.9 | 16,250 | 15,331 | 6.0 | 47,259 | 45,050 | 4.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wireline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mass Markets | 4,619 | 4,628 | (0.2 | ) | 9,204 | 9,218 | (0.2 | ) | 4,073 | 4,047 | 0.6 | 12,171 | 12,068 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Enterprise | 4,036 | 4,010 | 0.6 | 8,029 | 8,060 | (0.4 | ) | 3,926 | 3,958 | (0.8 | ) | 11,705 | 11,754 | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Wholesale | 2,232 | 2,434 | (8.3 | ) | 4,579 | 4,850 | (5.6 | ) | 2,072 | 2,307 | (10.2 | ) | 6,382 | 6,867 | (7.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 225 | 416 | (45.9 | ) | 532 | 927 | (42.6 | ) | 215 | 355 | (39.4 | ) | 680 | 1,181 | (42.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 11,112 | 11,488 | (3.3 | ) | 22,344 | 23,055 | (3.1 | ) | 10,286 | 10,667 | (3.6 | ) | 30,938 | 31,870 | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate, eliminations and other | (345 | ) | (107 | ) | nm | (447 | ) | (205 | ) | nm | (52 | ) | 1,267 | nm | 1,973 | 3,797 | (48.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Revenues | $ | 26,773 | $ | 26,861 | (0.3 | ) | $ | 53,686 | $ | 53,452 | 0.4 | $ | 26,484 | $ | 27,265 | (2.9 | ) | $ | 80,170 | $ | 80,717 | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
nm – not meaningful
Consolidated revenues decreased by $781 million, or 2.9%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, decreased by $88and $547 million or 0.3%0.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar periodperiods in 2009 primarily due to the sale of divested operations and declines in revenues at our Wireline segment resulting from switched access line losses and decreased MOUs in traditional voice products, partially offset by higher revenues in our growth markets. Consolidated revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $234 million, or 0.4%, compared to the similar period in 2009, primarily due to higher revenues in our growth markets. These revenue increases were partially offset by declines in revenues at our Wireline segment due to switched access line losses and decreased MOUs in traditional voice products.
Corporate, eliminations and other during the three and six months ended June 30,second quarter of 2010 included a one-time non-cash adjustment of $268 million primarily to reduce wireless data revenues. This adjustment was recorded to properly defer previously recognized wireless data revenues that will be earned and recognized in future periods. As the amounts involved were not material to our consolidated financial statements in the current or any previous reporting period, the adjustment was recorded during the second quarter of 2010 (see “Other Items”). In addition, the results of operations related to the divestitures included in Corporate, eliminations and other are as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Impact of Divested Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues | $ | – | $ | 1,331 | $ | 2,407 | $ | 4,009 | ||||||||
Cost of services and sales | – | 311 | 574 | 967 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | – | 333 | 665 | 973 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | – | 227 | 413 | 665 |
Domestic Wireless’ revenues increased by $919 million, or 6.0%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $526and $2,209 million, or 3.4%, and $1,187 million, or 3.9%4.9%, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to growth in service revenue. Service revenue increased by $1,019 million, or 7.7%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $697and $2,573 million, or 5.2%, and $1,467 million, or 5.6%6.6%, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to a 4.46.2 million, or 5.0%7.1%, increase in total customers since JulyOctober 1, 2009, as well as continued growth fromin our data services,ARPU, partially offset by a decline in wireless voice revenue.ARPU.
Total wireless data revenue was $4,839$5,062 million and accounted for 34.5%35.7% of service revenue during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, compared to $3,908$4,007 million and 29.3%30.5% during the similar period in 2009. Total wireless data revenue was $9,451$14,282 million and accounted for 33.9%34.5% of service revenue during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to $7,557$11,366 million and 28.6%29.2% during the similar period in 2009. Total data revenue continues to increase as a result of growththe increased penetration of ourdata offerings, in particular for e-mail Mobile Broadband and messaging services.web services resulting in part from increased sales of smartphone and other data-capable devices. Voice revenue decreased as a resultprimarily due to the impact of continued declineschanges in our customer mix as well as the ongoing impact of customers seeking to optimize the value of our voice ARPU,minute bundles, partially offset by an increase in the number of customers.
Equipment and other revenue decreased by $100 million, or 4.6%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $171and $364 million, or 8.0%, and $280 million, or 6.7%5.9%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 due to declines in gross retail customer additions. The decrease in Equipment and other revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2010 was also impacted by lower revenue from cost recovery surcharges as a result of a decrease in our cost recovery rate.
Wireline’s revenues decreased by $381 million, or 3.6%, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $932 million, or 2.9%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily driven by switched access line losses and decreased MOUs in traditional voice products. Mass Markets revenues increased by $26 million, or 0.6%, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $103 million, or 0.9%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to the decreaseexpansion of consumer and business FiOS services (Voice, Internet and TV), which are typically sold in gross retail customer additions as well as a decrease in average revenue per equipment unit as a result of promotional activities.
Wireline’s revenues duringbundles, partially offset by the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $376 million, or 3.3%, and $711 million, or 3.1%, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009. Mass Markets revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by $9 million, or 0.2%, and $14 million, or 0.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009, primarily due to a continued decline of local exchange revenues principally as a result of a decline in switched access line losses, partially offset by continued growth in consumer and business FiOS services (Voice, Internet and TV). lines.
Global Enterprise revenues increaseddecreased by $26$32 million, or 0.6%0.8%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in 2009 primarily due to lower local services and traditional circuit-based revenues, partially offset by higher customer premises equipment revenue, partially offset by lower long distance and traditional circuit-based revenues.revenue. Global Enterprise revenues decreased $31$49 million, or 0.4%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in 2009 primarily due to lower long distance and traditional circuit-based data revenues, partially offset by higher customer premises equipment and strategic networking revenue. Global Wholesale revenues decreased by $235 million, or 10.2%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $202and $485 million, or 8.3%, and $271 million, or 5.6%7.1%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to decreased MOUs in traditional voice products, increases in voice termination pricing on certain international routes, which negatively impacted volume, and continued rate compression in the marketplace. Other revenue decreased by $140 million, or 39.4%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $191and $501 million, or 45.9%, and $395 million, or 42.6%42.4%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to reduced business volumes, including former MCI mass markets customer losses.
Consolidated Operating Expenses |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales | $ | 12,239 | $ | 10,481 | 16.8 | $ | 22,956 | $ | 20,789 | 10.4 | $ | 11,250 | $ | 10,996 | 2.3 | $ | 34,206 | $ | 31,785 | 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 8,319 | 7,871 | 5.7 | 16,043 | 15,432 | 4.0 | 7,465 | 8,111 | (8.0 | ) | 23,508 | 23,543 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 4,176 | 4,091 | 2.1 | 8,297 | 8,119 | 2.2 | 4,022 | 4,172 | (3.6 | ) | 12,319 | 12,291 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Operating Expenses | $ | 24,734 | $ | 22,443 | 10.2 | $ | 47,296 | $ | 44,340 | 6.7 | $ | 22,737 | $ | 23,279 | (2.3 | ) | $ | 70,033 | $ | 67,619 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating expenses decreased by $542 million, or 2.3%, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and increased $2,414 million or 3.6% during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. Consolidated operating expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were primarily impacted by higher severance, pension and benefit charges as well as higher operating expenses at Domestic Wireless. Consolidated operating expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were favorably impacted primarily by the sale of divested operations and cost reduction initiatives at Wireline.
Cost of Services and Sales
Consolidated costCost of services and sales increased by $254 million, or 2.3%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $1,758and $2,421 million, or 16.8%, and $2,167 million, or 10.4%7.6%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to severance, pension and benefit charges recorded during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 as well asand other non-operational charges noted in the table below. Also contributing to the increases were an increase inhigher content costs, higher circuit expense and customer premise equipment costs, partially offset by the sale of the divested operations, lower headcount and productivity improvements at our Wireline segment. The nine months ended September 30, 2010 were also impacted by higher customer premise equipment costs. Wireless network costs also increased as a result of an increase in operating lease expense and local interconnection cost.cost and increases in roaming costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Consolidated selling,Selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $646 million, or 8.0%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $448and $35 million, or 5.7%0.1%, and $611 million, or 4.0% during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. This increase wasThese decreases were primarily due to lower severance, pension and benefit charges, recorded during the threesale of the divested operations and six months ended June 30, 2010 as well as other non-operational charges notedthe impact of cost reduction initiatives in our Wireline segment. Partially offsetting the table below. Also contributing to the increasesdecreases were higher sales commission expense at our Domestic Wireless segment in our indirect channel related to increases in both contract renewals in connection with equipment upgrades leading to contract renewals and the average commission per unit as the mix of units and service plans sold continues to shift toward data devicesdevices. Selling, general and bundled data plans. Partially offsetting these increases wasadministrative expense during the impact of cost reduction initiativesthree and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were also impacted by higher access line spin-off related charges noted in our Wireline segment.the table below.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $150 million, or 3.6%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and increased by $85$28 million, or 2.1%0.2%, and $178 million, or 2.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the similar periods in 2009. The increases weredecrease during the three months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily driven bydue to the sale of the divested operations. The increase during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in 2009 was primarily due to growth in depreciable assets. Partially offsettingassets, partially offset by sale of the increases in Depreciationdivested operations. The three and amortization expensenine months ended September 30, 2010 were also impacted by lower non-operational charges noted in the table below.
Non-operational Charges
Non-operational charges included in operating expenses were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Merger Integration and Acquisition Related Charges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales | $ | 96 | $ | 24 | $ | 133 | $ | 85 | $ | 92 | $ | 79 | $ | 225 | $ | 164 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 66 | 66 | 106 | 206 | 42 | 102 | 148 | 308 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 25 | 91 | 53 | 136 | 25 | 96 | 78 | 232 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 187 | $ | 181 | $ | 292 | $ | 427 | $ | 159 | $ | 277 | $ | 451 | $ | 704 | ||||||||||||
Severance, Pension and Benefit Charges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales | $ | 1,649 | $ | – | $ | 1,749 | $ | – | $ | 618 | $ | – | $ | 2,367 | $ | – | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 665 | 416 | 701 | 416 | 255 | 610 | 956 | 1,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,314 | $ | 416 | $ | 2,450 | $ | 416 | $ | 873 | $ | 610 | $ | 3,323 | $ | 1,026 | ||||||||||||
Access Line Spin-off Related Charges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales | $ | 27 | $ | – | $ | 42 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 3 | $ | 42 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 168 | – | 298 | – | 67 | 59 | 365 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 195 | $ | – | $ | 340 | $ | – | $ | 67 | $ | 62 | $ | 407 | $ | 62 | ||||||||||||
See “Other Items” for a description of the non-operational items above as well as other non-operational items including the Medicare Part D subsidy charge and a charge related to the taxable gain on the Alltel Divestiture Markets.items.
Other Consolidated Results |
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Businesses
Additional information relating to Equity in earnings of unconsolidated businesses is as follows:decreased by $25 million and $27 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to lower earnings at Vodafone Omnitel N.V. (Vodafone Omnitel) which were primarily driven by the devaluation of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
Vodafone Omnitel N.V. | $ | 141 | $ | 142 | (0.7 | ) | $ | 294 | $ | 284 | 3.5 | |||||||||||
Other | (20 | ) | (14 | ) | 42.9 | (40 | ) | (28 | ) | 42.9 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 121 | $ | 128 | (5.5 | ) | $ | 254 | $ | 256 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Other Income and (Expense), Net
Additional information relating to Other income and (expense), net is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 17 | $ | 18 | (5.6 | ) | $ | 44 | $ | 41 | 7.3 | $ | 17 | $ | 18 | (5.6 | ) | $ | 61 | $ | 59 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gains (losses), net | 6 | (9 | ) | nm | 20 | 20 | – | (17 | ) | (13 | ) | 30.8 | 3 | 7 | (57.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other, net | (6 | ) | 2 | nm | (2 | ) | 3 | nm | (50 | ) | 8 | nm | (52 | ) | 11 | nm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 17 | $ | 11 | 54.5 | $ | 62 | $ | 64 | (3.1 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | 13 | nm | $ | 12 | $ | 77 | (84.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
nm – not meaningful
Other income and (expense), net decreased by $63 million and $65 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to fees incurred during the third quarter of 2010 related to the early extinguishment of debt (see “Consolidated Financial Condition”). The decreases were also driven by foreign exchange losses primarily resulting from the devaluation of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar.
Interest Expense
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest costs on debt balances | $ | 909 | $ | 1,017 | (10.6 | ) | $ | 1,815 | $ | 2,177 | (16.6 | ) | $ | 834 | $ | 935 | (10.8 | ) | $ | 2,649 | $ | 3,112 | (14.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less capitalized interest costs | 230 | 230 | – | 456 | 465 | (1.9 | ) | 237 | 231 | 2.6 | 693 | 696 | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 679 | $ | 787 | (13.7 | ) | $ | 1,359 | $ | 1,712 | (20.6 | ) | $ | 597 | $ | 704 | (15.2 | ) | $ | 1,956 | $ | 2,416 | (19.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average debt outstanding | $ | 60,080 | $ | 66,663 | $ | 60,886 | $ | 64,741 | $ | 54,236 | $ | 64,257 | $ | 58,568 | $ | 64,530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective interest rate | 6.05 | % | 6.10 | % | 5.96 | % | 6.73 | % | 6.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.4 | % |
Total interest costs on debt balances decreased by $108$101 million and $362$463 million, respectively, during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to declines in average debt, andpartially offset by higher interest rates.rates during the three months ended September 30, 2010. Interest costs during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 included fees related to the bridge facility that was entered into and utilized to complete the acquisition of Alltel, which contributed to the higher effective interest rate in the prior year. During July 2010, we reduced our outstanding debt by approximately $4.0 billion.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 610 | nm | $ | 1,516 | $ | 1,350 | 12.3 | |||||||||
Effective income tax rate | (3.3 | %) | 16.2 | % | 28.4 | % | 17.5 | % |
nm – not meaningful
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 321 | $ | 574 | (44.1 | ) | $ | 1,837 | $ | 1,924 | (4.5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 9.9 | % | 16.6 | % | 21.4 | % | 17.2 | % |
The effective income tax rate is calculated by dividing the provision for income taxes by income before the provision for income taxes. Our annual effective tax rate is significantly lower than the statutory federal income tax rate due to the inclusion of income attributable to Vodafone Group Plc.’s (Vodafone) noncontrolling interest in the Verizon Wireless partnership within our income before the provision for income taxes.
The effective income tax rate decreased to 9.9% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased to (3.3%) compared to 16.2%16.6% during the similar period in 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by thelower Net lossincome attributable to Verizon, which was related to the severance, pension and benefit charges. This was partially offset by a taxable gain oncharges, the saleimpact of higher earnings attributable to the Alltel Divestiture Markets (see “Other Items”).noncontrolling interest and lower state income tax from domestic restructuring in the period.
The effective income tax rate increased to 21.4% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased to 28.4% as compared to 17.5%17.2% during the similar period in 2009. The increase was primarily driven by a one-time, non-cash income tax charge of $962 million, resulting in an 1811 percentage point increase to our effective tax rate. Also impacting the effective tax rate were the items discussed above. The one-time non-cash income tax charge was a result of the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, both of which became law in March 2010 (collectively the Health Care Act). Under the Health Care Act, beginning in 2013, Verizon and other companies that receive a subsidy under Medicare Part D to provide retiree prescription drug coverage will no longer receive a federal income tax deduction for the expenses incurred in connection with providing the subsidized coverage to the extent of the subsidy received. Because future anticipated retiree prescription drug plan liabilities and related subsidies are already reflected in Verizon’s financial statements, this change required Verizon to reduce the value of the related tax benefits recognized in its financial statements in the period during which the Health Care Act was enacted. The ongoing impact on our 2010 effective tax rate from the lower federal income tax deduction is not significant.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company projects its 2010 effective tax rate to be in the range of 16% to 17% excluding the impact of integration and similar costs incurred in connection with the Alltel acquisition, divestiture of Alltel overlapping properties, divestiture of access lines, and severance, pension and benefit charges. As a global commercial enterprise, it is difficult to forecast the Company’s full-year effective tax rate with any further precision due to the numerous factors that could occur and impact the rate. Examples of these factors include possible changes in federal, state and foreign income tax laws or rates, developments with respect to open tax years and income tax audits requiring adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits, acquisitions and dispositions, and changes in operating results that would require increases or decreases to valuation allowances. For 2010, excluding earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest in Verizon Wireless, the effective tax rate attributable to Verizon is projected to be in the range of 31% to 32%.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits were $3,273$3,196 million and $3,400 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits were $495$506 million (after-tax) and $552 million (after-tax) at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently examining the Company’s U.S. income tax returns for tax years 2004 through 2006. As a large taxpayer, we are under continual audit by the IRS and multiple state and foreign jurisdictions on numerous open tax positions. Significant foreign income tax examinations and litigation are ongoing in Canada, Australia and Italy for tax years as early as 2002. It is reasonably possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could change by a significant amount during the next twelve-month period. An estimate of the range of the possible change cannot be made until issues are further developed or examinations close.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to | $ 1,745 | $ 1,677 | 4.1 | $ 3,620 | $ 3,242 | 11.7 | $ | 2,039 | $ | 1,711 | 19.2 | $ | 5,659 | $ | 4,953 | 14.3 |
The increase in Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 was due to higher earnings in our Domestic Wireless segment, which has a 45% noncontrolling partnership interest attributable to Vodafone.
Segment Results of Operations |
We have two reportable segments, Domestic Wireless and Wireline, which we operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and services. We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on segment operating income. The use of segment operating income is consistent with the chief operating decision maker’s assessment of segment performance.
Segment earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Segment EBITDA), which is presented below, is a non-GAAP measure and does not purport to be an alternative to operating income as a measure of operating performance. Management believes that this measure is useful to investors and other users of our financial information in evaluating operating profitability on a more variable cost basis, as it excludes the depreciation and amortization expenses related primarily to capital expenditures and acquisitions that occurred in prior years, as well as in evaluating operating performance in relation to Verizon’s competitors. Segment EBITDA is calculated by adding back depreciation and amortization expense to segment operating income.
Verizon Wireless Segment EBITDA service margin, also presented below, is calculated by dividing Verizon Wireless Segment EBITDA by Verizon Wireless service revenues. Verizon Wireless Segment EBITDA service margin utilizes service revenues rather than total revenues. Service revenues exclude primarily equipment revenues (as well as other non-service revenues) in order to capturereflect the impact of providing service to the wireless customer base on an ongoing basis.
It is management’s intent to provide non-GAAP financial information to enhance the understanding of Verizon’s GAAP financial information, and it should be considered by the reader in addition to, but not instead of, the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Each non-GAAP financial measure is presented along with the corresponding GAAP measure so as not to imply that more emphasis should be placed on the non-GAAP measure. The non-GAAP financial information presented may be determined or calculated differently by other companies.
Domestic Wireless |
Our Domestic Wireless segment provides wireless voice and data services and equipment sales across the U.S. This segment primarily represents the operations of the Verizon joint venture with Vodafone, operating as Verizon Wireless. We own a 55% interest in the joint venture and Vodafone owns the remaining 45%. All financial results included in the tables below reflect the consolidated results of Verizon Wireless.
The following discussion includesWireless excluding the results of operations of the Alltel Divestiture Markets through the date the divestitures were completed.completed (see “Recent Developments”).
Operating Revenue and Selected Operating Statistics
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions, except ARPU) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
Service revenue | $ | 14,046 | $ | 13,349 | 5.2 | $ | 27,891 | $ | 26,424 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and other | 1,960 | 2,131 | (8.0 | ) | 3,898 | 4,178 | (6.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Operating Revenue | $ | 16,006 | $ | 15,480 | 3.4 | $ | 31,789 | $ | 30,602 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||
Total customers (‘000) | 92,063 | 87,694 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail customers (‘000) | 86,176 | 85,240 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total customer net additions in period | 1,351 | 1,142 | 18.3 | 2,903 | 2,419 | 20.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail customer net additions in period | 454 | 1,145 | (60.3 | ) | 742 | 2,406 | (69.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total customer net additions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(divestitures) in period | (738 | ) | 1,142 | nm | 814 | 15,638 | (94.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Retail customer net additions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(divestitures) in period | (1,635 | ) | 1,145 | nm | (1,347 | ) | 15,219 | nm | ||||||||||||||
Total churn rate | 1.27 | % | 1.37 | % | (7.3 | ) | 1.34 | % | 1.42 | % | (5.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Retail postpaid churn rate | 0.94 | % | 1.01 | % | (6.9 | ) | 1.01 | % | 1.08 | % | (6.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Service ARPU | $ | 50.42 | $ | 51.10 | (1.3 | ) | $ | 50.29 | $ | 50.92 | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Retail service ARPU | 51.56 | 51.11 | 0.9 | 51.25 | 51.04 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Total data ARPU | 17.37 | 14.96 | 16.1 | 17.04 | 14.56 | 17.0 |
nm – not meaningful
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, Service revenue Equipment and other Total Operating Revenue Total customers (‘000) Retail customers (‘000) Total customer net additions in period Retail customer net additions in period Total churn rate Retail postpaid churn rate Service ARPU Retail service ARPU Total data ARPU (dollars in millions, except ARPU) 2010 2009 % Change 2010 2009 % Change $ 14,168 $ 13,149 7.7 $ 41,436 $ 38,863 6.6 2,082 2,182 (4.6 ) 5,823 6,187 (5.9 ) $ 16,250 $ 15,331 6.0 $ 47,259 $ 45,050 4.9 93,170 86,990 7.1 86,734 84,268 2.9
(excluding acquisitions and adjustments)(‘000) 997 1,185 (15.9 ) 3,884 3,495 11.1
(excluding acquisitions and adjustments)(‘000) 447 916 (51.2 ) 1,174 3,212 (63.4 ) 1.36 % 1.46 % (6.8 ) 1.32 % 1.42 % (7.0 ) 1.07 % 1.12 % (4.5 ) 1.02 % 1.08 % (5.6 ) $ 50.94 $ 50.77 0.3 $ 50.41 $ 50.71 (0.6 ) 51.99 51.09 1.8 51.47 50.98 1.0 18.20 15.47 17.6 17.37 14.83 17.1
Domestic Wireless’ total operating revenue during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $526$919 million, or 3.4%6.0%, and $1,187$2,209 million, or 3.9%4.9%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to growth in service revenue.
Service Revenue
Service revenue during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $697$1,019 million, or 5.2%7.7%, and $1,467$2,573 million, or 5.6%6.6%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to a 4.46.2 million, or 5.0%7.1%, increase in total customers since JulyOctober 1, 2009, as well as continued growth fromin our data services,ARPU, partially offset by a decline in wireless voice revenue.ARPU.
Excluding the Alltel related acquisitionacquisitions and divestitures,adjustments, Domestic Wireless added approximately 454,000447,000 and 1.2 million net retail customers, respectively, during the three and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, compared to approximately 1.1916,000 and 3.2 million during the similar period in 2009, and approximately 742,000 net retail customers during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately 2.4 million during the similar periodperiods in 2009. The decline in net retail customer additions during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 was due to a decrease in gross retail customer additions, as well as an increase in churn for our retail prepaid offerings,base in part attributable to a marketplace shift in customer activations within the period toward unlimited prepaid offerings of the type being sold by a number of our resellers. However, we expect to continue to experience retail customer growth based on the strength of our product offerings and network service quality. Our total churn rate during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 improved as a result of successful customer retention efforts. Churn is the rate at which customers disconnect individual lines of service.
Excluding the Alltel related acquisitionacquisitions and divestitures,adjustments, Domestic Wireless added approximately 1.4997,000 and 3.9 million net total customers, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to approximately 1.2 million and 3.5 million during the similar periods in 2009. The decrease in net total customer additions during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 comparedwas due to approximately 1.1 million during the similar perioddecline in 2009, and approximately 2.9 million net total customers during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to approximately 2.4 million during the similar period in 2009.retail customer additions described above. The increase in net total customer additions during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periodsperiod in 2009 was due to anthe cumulative increase in net customer additions from our reseller channel as a result of the marketplace shift in customer activations mentioned above.
DuringCustomers from acquisitions and adjustments for the second quarter, our customer base was reduced bythree and nine months ended September 30, 2010 included approximately 2.1 million106,000 net customers, primarily asafter conforming adjustments, that we acquired in a result of the completion of the divestitures totransaction with AT&T Mobility and ATN, partially offset by certain adjustments.&T. Customers from acquisitions for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 included approximately 13.211.4 million net total customer additions, after conforming adjustments but beforeand the impact of required divestitures, which resulted from our acquisition of Alltel on January 9, 2009.
Total data revenue was $4,839$5,062 million and accounted for 35.7% of service revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $4,007 million and 30.5% during the similar period in 2009. Total data revenue was $14,282 million and accounted for 34.5% of service revenue during the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to $3,908$11,366 million and 29.3% during the similar period in 2009. Total data revenue was $9,451 million and accounted for 33.9% of service revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $7,557 million and 28.6%29.2% during the similar period in 2009. Total data revenue continues to increase as a result of growththe increased penetration of ourdata offerings, in particular for e-mail Mobile Broadband and messaging services.web services resulting in part from increased sales of smartphone and other data-capable devices. Voice revenue decreased as a result of continued declines in our voice ARPU, as discussed below, partially offset by an increase in the number of customers. We expect that total service revenue and data revenue will continue to grow as we grow our customer base, increase the penetration of our data offerings and increase the proportion of our customer base using third generation (3G) multimedia phones or 3G smartphone and other data-capable devices.
The decline in service ARPU for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the similar period in 2009 was due to a continued reduction in voice revenue per customer and the impact of changes in our customer mix as a result of increased reseller net customer additions, partially offset by an increase in data revenue per customer. RetailARPU. Service ARPU for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and retail service ARPU for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased due to increases in our penetration of data offerings, which more than offset declines in our voice revenues. Total voice ARPU declined $3.09,$2.56, or 8.6%7.3%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and declined $3.11,$2.84, or 8.6%7.9%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 due to the on-goingimpact of the aforementioned changes in our customer mix as well as the ongoing impact of customers seeking to optimize the value of our offerings by moving to bundledvoice minute and Family Share plans.bundles. The increases in total data ARPU were thea result of continued growth and penetration of our data offerings, primarily as a resultresulting in part from the above mentioned increase in sales of data packages attached to our 3G multimedia phonessmartphone and 3G smartphoneother data-capable devices.
Equipment and Other Revenue
Equipment and other revenue during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $171$100 million, or 8.0%4.6%, and $280$364 million, or 6.7%5.9%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to declines in gross retail customer additionsadditions. The decrease in Equipment and averageother revenue per equipment unitduring the three months ended September 30, 2010 was also impacted by lower revenue from cost recovery surcharges as a result of promotional activities.a decrease in our cost recovery rate.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales | $ | 4,780 | $ | 4,825 | (0.9 | ) | $ | 9,555 | $ | 9,485 | 0.7 | $ | 5,017 | $ | 4,929 | 1.8 | $ | 14,428 | $ | 14,204 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 4,557 | 4,469 | 2.0 | 9,199 | 8,911 | 3.2 | 4,543 | 4,399 | 3.3 | 13,486 | 13,056 | 3.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,827 | 1,727 | 5.8 | 3,639 | 3,476 | 4.7 | 1,836 | 1,758 | 4.4 | 5,475 | 5,234 | 4.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | $ | 11,164 | $ | 11,021 | 1.3 | $ | 22,393 | $ | 21,872 | 2.4 | $ | 11,396 | $ | 11,086 | 2.8 | $ | 33,389 | $ | 32,494 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Services and Sales
Cost of services and sales increased by $88 million, or 1.8%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $45and $224 million, or 0.9%, and increased by $70 million, or 0.7%1.6%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. The decrease during the three months ended June 30, 2010 was due to a $109 million, or 3.7%, decrease in cost of equipment sales, partially offset by an increase in cost of services. The increase during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was due to an increaseincreases in cost of services partially offset bywere primarily attributable to higher wireless network costs due to increases in local interconnection cost, as a $76 million, or 1.3%, decreaseresult of both higher capacity needs from increases in cost of equipment sales. Costdata usage as well as costs incurred to transition to Ethernet facilities that will be used to enable LTE. In addition, the increase in costs of services was impacted by higher roaming costs as a result of increased international roaming volumes, data roaming and roaming costs incurred in the Alltel Divestiture Markets. Also contributing to higher wireless network costs during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 as compared to the similar periodsperiod in 2009 was also impacted by higher wireless network costs as a result of an increase in operating lease expense and local interconnection cost.related to our network cell sites. Cost of equipment sales decreased by $68 million and $134 million during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to a decrease in gross retail customer additions partially offset by an increase in the average cost per unit.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $144 million, or 3.3%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $88and $430 million, or 2.0%, and $288 million, or 3.2%3.3%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sales commission expense in our indirect channel as well as an increase in regulatory fees.channel. Indirect sales commission expense increased $195$175 million and $494 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and $312 million during the six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 as a result of increases in both contract renewals in connection with equipment upgrades leading to contract renewals and the average commission per unit as the mix of units and service plans sold continues to shift toward data devices and bundled data plans. Regulatory fees increased $32 milliondevices. Also contributing to the increase during the threenine months ended June 30, 2010 and $109 million during the six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periodsperiod in 2009 was an increase in non-income taxes of $110 million, due to both the growth in our revenues subject to fees as well as an increaseincreases in the federal universal service fund rate. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in compensation related costs, excluding commissions during the three months ended June 30, 2010, of $126 million, and $91$141 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periodsperiod in 2009.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $78 million, or 4.4%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $100and $241 million, or 5.8%4.6%, and $163 million, or 4.7% during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. These increases were primarily driven by growth in depreciable assets through the secondthird quarter of 2010.
Segment Operating Income and EBITDA
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Operating Income | $ | 4,842 | $ | 4,459 | 8.6 | $ | 9,396 | $ | 8,730 | 7.6 | $ | 4,854 | $ | 4,245 | 14.3 | $ | 13,870 | $ | 12,556 | 10.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,827 | 1,727 | 5.8 | 3,639 | 3,476 | 4.7 | 1,836 | 1,758 | 4.4 | 5,475 | 5,234 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment EBITDA | $ | 6,669 | $ | 6,186 | 7.8 | $ | 13,035 | $ | 12,206 | 6.8 | $ | 6,690 | $ | 6,003 | 11.4 | $ | 19,345 | $ | 17,790 | 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment operating income margin | 30.3 | % | 28.8 | % | 29.6 | % | 28.5 | % | 29.9 | % | 27.7 | % | 29.3 | % | 27.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment EBITDA service margin | 47.5 | % | 46.3 | % | 46.7 | % | 46.2 | % | 47.2 | % | 45.7 | % | 46.7 | % | 45.8 | % |
The increases in Domestic Wireless’ Operating income and Segment EBITDA during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 were primarily as a result of the impact of factors described above.
Wireline |
The Wireline segment provides customers with communication products and services, including voice, broadband video and data, network access, long distance, and other services, to residential and small business customers and carriers, as well as next-generation IP network services and communications solutions to medium and large businesses and government customers globally.
The following discussion excludes the results of the operations acquired by Frontier, which we owned through June 30, 2010 (see “Recent Developments”).
Operating Revenues and Selected Operating Statistics
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mass Markets | $ | 4,619 | $ | 4,628 | (0.2 | ) | $ | 9,204 | $ | 9,218 | (0.2 | ) | $ | 4,073 | $ | 4,047 | 0.6 | $ | 12,171 | $ | 12,068 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Enterprise | 4,036 | 4,010 | 0.6 | 8,029 | 8,060 | (0.4 | ) | 3,926 | 3,958 | (0.8 | ) | 11,705 | 11,754 | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Wholesale | 2,232 | 2,434 | (8.3 | ) | 4,579 | 4,850 | (5.6 | ) | 2,072 | 2,307 | (10.2 | ) | 6,382 | 6,867 | (7.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 225 | 416 | (45.9 | ) | 532 | 927 | (42.6 | ) | 215 | 355 | (39.4 | ) | 680 | 1,181 | (42.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Revenues | $ | 11,112 | $ | 11,488 | (3.3 | ) | $ | 22,344 | $ | 23,055 | (3.1 | ) | $ | 10,286 | $ | 10,667 | (3.6 | ) | $ | 30,938 | $ | 31,870 | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Switched access lines in service (‘000) | 31,150 | 34,313 | (9.2 | ) | 26,544 | 29,003 | (8.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broadband connections (‘000) | 9,338 | 9,111 | 2.5 | 8,340 | 8,119 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FiOS Internet subscribers (‘000) | 3,814 | 3,082 | 23.8 | 3,885 | 3,136 | 23.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FiOS TV subscribers (‘000) | 3,203 | 2,517 | 27.3 | 3,290 | 2,601 | 26.5 |
Mass Markets
Mass Markets revenue includes local exchange (basic service and end-user access), long distance (including regional toll), broadband services (including high-speed Internet and FiOS Internet) and FiOS TV services for residential and small business subscribers.
Mass Markets revenue increased by $26 million, or 0.6%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $9and $103 million, or 0.2%, and $14 million, or 0.2%0.9%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. The decreaseincrease was primarily driven by athe expansion of consumer and business FiOS services (Voice, Internet and TV), which are typically sold in bundles, partially offset by the decline inof local exchange revenues principally due toas a 9.2%result of an 8.5% decline in switched access lines as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to JuneSeptember 30, 2009, primarily as a result of competition and technology substitution. The majority of the decrease was sustained in the residential retail market, which experienced a 10.5%9.6% access line loss primarily due to substituting traditional landline services with wireless, VoIP, broadband and cable services. Also contributing to the decrease was a decline of nearly 4.2%4.6% in small business retail access lines, primarily reflecting economic conditions, competition and a shift to both IP and high-speed circuits. Partially offsetting these decreases was the expansion of FiOS services (Voice, Internet and TV).
As we continue to expand the number of premises eligible to order FiOS services and extend our sales and marketing efforts to attract new FiOS subscribers, we have continued to grow our subscriber base and consistently improved penetration rates within our FiOS service areas. Our bundled pricing strategy allows us to provide competitive offerings to our customers and potential customers. Consequently, we added 28,00061,000 net new broadband connections, including 196,000226,000 net new FiOS Internet subscribers, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we added 118,000180,000 net new broadband connections, including 381,000599,000 net new FiOS Internet subscribers, for a total of 9.38.3 million broadband connections, or 2.7% growth, at JuneSeptember 30, 2010, including 3.8 million2010. FiOS Internet subscribers have reached 3.9 million customers, representing a 23.8%23.9% increase compared to JuneSeptember 30, 2009. In addition, we added 174,000204,000 net new FiOS TV subscribers during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 342,000 net new540,000 FiOS TV subscribers during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 for a total of 3.23.3 million FiOS TV subscribers at JuneSeptember 30, 2010. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we achieved penetration rates of 29.7%31.0% and 25.9%27.2% for FiOS Internet and FiOS TV, respectively, compared to penetration rates of 28.1%28.7% and 24.6%25.1% for FiOS Internet and FiOS TV, respectively, at JuneSeptember 30, 2009.
Global Enterprise
Global Enterprise offers voice, data and Internet communications services to medium and large business customers, multi-national corporations, and state and federal government customers. In addition to traditional voice and data services, Global Enterprise offers managed and advanced products and solutions including IP services and value-added solutions that make communications more secure, reliable and efficient. Global Enterprise also provides managed network services for customers that outsource all or portions of their communications and information processing operations and data services such as private IP, private line, frame relay and asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) services, both domestically and internationally. In addition, Global Enterprise offers professional services in more than 30 countries supporting a range of solutions including network service, managing a move to IP-based unified communications and providing application performance support.
Global Enterprise revenues decreased by $32 million, or 0.8%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $26 million, or 0.6%, compared to the similar period in 2009 primarily due to lower local services and traditional circuit-based revenues, partially offset by higher customer premises equipment revenue, partially offset by lower long distance and traditional circuit-based revenues.revenue. Global Enterprise revenues decreased $31$49 million, or 0.4%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in 2009 primarily due to lower long distance and traditional circuit-based data revenues. The decrease was partially offset by higher customer premises equipment and strategic networking revenue, which may indicate that companies are beginning to make additional capital
expenditures. The decline in long distance revenue is due to the negative effects of the continuing global economic conditions and competitive rate pressures. In addition to increased customer premise equipment revenues, strategic enterprise services revenue increased $96$108 million, or 6.2%6.9%, and $159$267 million, or 5.2%5.8%, during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily driven bydue to higher information technology, security solution and strategic networking revenues. Strategic enterprise services continues to be Global Enterprise’s fastest growing suite of offerings. Traditional circuit-based services such as frame relay, private line and ATM services declined compared to the similar period last year as our customer base continues its migration to next generation IP services.
Global Wholesale
Global Wholesale revenues are primarily earned from long distance and other carriers who use our facilities to provide services to their customers. Switched access revenues are generated from fixed and usage-based charges paid by carriers for access to our local network, interexchange wholesale traffic sold in the U.S., and internationally destined traffic that originates in the U.S. Special access revenues are generated from carriers that buy dedicated local exchange capacity to support their private networks. Wholesale services also include local wholesale revenues from unbundled network elements and interconnection revenues from competitive local exchange carriers and wireless carriers. A portion of Global Wholesale revenues are generated by a few large telecommunication companies, many of whom compete directly with us.
Global Wholesale revenues decreased by $235 million, or 10.2%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $202and $485 million, or 8.3%, and $271 million, or 5.6%7.1%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to decreased MOUs in traditional voice products, increases in voice termination pricing on certain international routes, which negatively impacted volume, and continued rate compression due to competition in the marketplace. Switched access and interexchange wholesale MOUs declined primarily as a result of wireless substitution and access line losses. Domestic wholesale lines declined by 14.9%11.0% as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010 as compared to JuneSeptember 30, 2009 due to the continued impact of competitors deemphasizing their local market initiatives coupled with the impact of technology substitution as well as the continued level of economic pressure. Voice and local loop services declined during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. Continuing demand for high-capacity, high-speed digital services was partially offset by lower demand for older, low-speed data products and services. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, customer demand, as measured in DS1 and DS3 circuits, for high-capacity and high-speed digital data services increased 3.8% compared to the similar period in 2009.
Other
Other revenues include such services as local exchange and long distance services from former MCI mass market customers, operator services, pay phone, card services and supply sales. Revenues from other services decreased $140 million, or 39.4% during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased $191and $501 million, or 45.9%, and $395 million, or 42.6%,42.4% during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 primarily due to reduced business volumes, including former MCI mass market customer losses.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and sales | $ | 6,001 | $ | 5,947 | 0.9 | $ | 12,115 | $ | 11,842 | 2.3 | $ | 5,803 | $ | 5,978 | (2.9 | ) | $ | 17,457 | $ | 17,347 | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 2,590 | 2,726 | (5.0 | ) | 5,268 | 5,492 | (4.1 | ) | 2,319 | 2,423 | (4.3 | ) | 7,176 | 7,527 | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 2,307 | 2,260 | 2.1 | 4,575 | 4,475 | 2.2 | 2,145 | 2,075 | 3.4 | 6,308 | 6,112 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | $ | 10,898 | $ | 10,933 | (0.3 | ) | $ | 21,958 | $ | 21,809 | 0.7 | $ | 10,267 | $ | 10,476 | (2.0 | ) | $ | 30,941 | $ | 30,986 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Services and Sales
Cost of services and sales decreased by $175 million, or 2.9%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and increased by $54$110 million or 0.9%, and $273 million, or 2.3%0.6%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. The increases were primarilydecrease for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was due to higher content costs associated with continued FiOS subscriber growth. Also contributing to the increases were higher circuit expense and customer premise equipment costs. The increases were partially offset by lower costs associated with compensation and installation expenses as a result of lower headcount and productivity improvements, as well as lower access costs driven by declines in long distance volumes. The decrease was offset by higher content costs associated with continued FiOS subscriber growth and higher strategic networking expenses. The increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was due to higher strategic networking expense, customer premise equipment costs and content costs. This was partially offset by lower headcount, productivity improvements and lower access costs driven by declines in long distance volumes.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $104 million, or 4.3%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 decreased by $136and $351 million, or 5.0%, and $224 million, or 4.1%4.7%, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the decline in compensation expense as a result of lower headcount and cost reduction initiatives. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was partially offset by higher gains on sales of assets in 2009.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $70 million, or 3.4%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $47and $196 million, or 2.1%, and $100 million, or 2.2%3.2% during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009. The increase was primarily driven by net growth ina higher depreciable assets.asset base.
Segment Operating Income and EBITDA
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Operating Income | $ | 214 | $ | 555 | (61.4 | ) | $ | 386 | $ | 1,246 | (69.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 19 | $ | 191 | (90.1 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 884 | nm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add Depreciation and amortization expense | 2,307 | 2,260 | 2.1 | 4,575 | 4,475 | 2.2 | 2,145 | 2,075 | 3.4 | 6,308 | 6,112 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment EBITDA | $ | 2,521 | $ | 2,815 | (10.4 | ) | $ | 4,961 | $ | 5,721 | (13.3 | ) | $ | 2,164 | $ | 2,266 | (4.5 | ) | $ | 6,305 | $ | 6,996 | (9.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment operating income margin | 1.9 | % | 4.8 | % | 1.7 | % | 5.4 | % | 0.2 | % | 1.8 | % | nm | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment EBITDA margin | 22.7 | % | 24.5 | % | 22.2 | % | 24.8 | % | 21.0 | % | 21.2 | % | 20.4 | % | 22.0 | % |
nm – not meaningful
The decreases in Wireline’s Operating income and Segment EBITDA during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar periods in 2009 were primarily a result of the impact of factors described in connection with operating revenue and operating expenses above.
Other Items |
Merger Integration and Acquisition Related Charges |
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded merger integration charges of $187$159 million and $292$451 million, respectively, primarily related to the Alltel acquisition. These charges primarily related to handset conversions, trade name amortization and the decommissioning of overlapping cell sites and trade name amortization.sites.
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we recorded merger integration and acquisition charges of $228$277 million and $684$961 million, respectively,respectively. These charges primarily related to the Alltel acquisition forand were comprised of trade name amortization, re-branding initiatives and handset conversions. The charges during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were also comprised of transaction fees and costs associated with the acquisition, including fees related to the bridgecredit facility that was entered into and utilized to complete the acquisition. The charges also included trade name amortization, handset conversions and the decommissioning of overlapping cell sites.
Severance, Pension and Benefit Charges |
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded severance, pension and benefits charges of $873 million and $3,323 million, respectively. The charges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, included non-cash pension settlement losses of $873 million and $1,089 million, respectively, related to employees who received lump-sum distributions, primarily resulting from our previously announced separation plans.
In April 2010, we reached an agreement with certain unions on temporary enhancements to the separation programs contained in their existing collective bargaining agreements. These temporary enhancements were intended to help address a previously declared surplus of employees and to help reduce the need for layoffs. Accordingly, during the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded severance, pension and benefits charges of $2,234 million associated with the approximately 11,000 union-represented employees who volunteered for the incentive offer. Included in theThese charges wereincluded $994 million for severance, $681 million for special termination benefits, as well as $173 million for pension curtailment losses and $386 million for postretirement curtailment losses of $559 million asthat were due to the workforce reductions which caused the elimination of a significant amount of future service requiring us to recognize a portion of prior service costs and actuarial losses. The charges also included $994 million of severance charges and $681 million of special termination benefits for planned workforce reductions of approximately 11,000 employees.service.
During the three and sixnine months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded non-cash pension settlement losses of $80 million and $216 million, respectively, related to employees who received lump-sum distributions, primarily resulting from our previously announced separation plans in which prescribed payment thresholds were reached.
During the three and six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we recorded non-cash pension settlement losses of $416$610 million and $1,026 million, respectively, related to employees who received lump-sum distributions primarily resulting from our previously announced separation plans in which prescribed payment thresholds were reached.
Medicare Part D Subsidy Charges |
Under the Health Care Act, beginning in 2013, Verizon and other companies that receive a subsidy under Medicare Part D to provide retiree prescription drug coverage will no longer receive a federal income tax deduction for the expenses incurred in connection with providing the subsidized coverage to the extent of the subsidy received. Because future anticipated retiree prescription drug plan liabilities and related subsidies are already reflected in Verizon’s financial statements, this change requiresrequired Verizon to reduce the value of the related tax benefits recognized in its financial statements in the period during which the Health Care Act was enacted. As a result, Verizon recorded a one-time, non-cash income tax charge of $962 million in the first quarter of 2010 to reflect the impact of this change.
Dispositions |
Access Line Spin-off Related Charges
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded charges of $195$123 million and $340$463 million, respectively, primarily for costs incurred related to network, non-network software and other activities to enable the divested markets in the transaction with Frontier to operate on a stand-alone basis subsequent to the closing of the transaction. Also included in these charges are fees related to early extinguishment of debt, as well as professional advisory and legal fees incurred in connection with the Frontier transaction.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded charges of $62 million primarily for costs incurred related to network, non-network software and other activities to enable the divested markets to operate on a stand-alone basis subsequent to the closing of the transaction with Frontier, as well as professional advisory and legal fees in connection with this transaction.
Alltel Divestiture Markets
During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we recorded a tax charge of approximately $192 million for the taxable gain on the excess of book over tax basis of the goodwill associated with the Alltel Divestiture Markets.
Other |
During the three and six months ended June 30,second quarter of 2010, we recorded a one-time non-cash adjustment of $268 million primarily to reduce wireless data revenues. This adjustment was recorded to properly defer previously recognized wireless data revenues that will be earned and recognized in future periods. As the amounts involved were notno such adjustment would have been material to our consolidated financial statements in the current or any previous reporting period, the adjustment was recorded during the second quarter, which reduced Net income (loss) attributable to Verizon during the quarter by $92 million.
Consolidated Financial Condition |
Six Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 16,873 | $ | 14,137 | $ | 2,736 | $ | 25,213 | $ | 23,118 | $ | 2,095 | |||||||||||
Investing activities | (5,609 | ) | (13,278 | ) | 7,669 | (10,159 | ) | (17,948 | ) | 7,789 | |||||||||||||
Financing activities | (8,512 | ) | (9,821 | ) | 1,309 | (11,669 | ) | (13,736 | ) | 2,067 | |||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 2,752 | $ | (8,962 | ) | $ | 11,714 | $ | 3,385 | $ | (8,566 | ) | $ | 11,951 | |||||||||
We use the net cash generated from our operations to fund network expansion and modernization, repay external financing, pay dividends, repurchase Verizon common stock from time to time and invest in new businesses. While our current liabilities typically exceed current assets, our sources of funds, primarily from operations and, to the extent necessary, from external financing arrangements, are sufficient to meet ongoing operating and investing requirements. We expect that our capital spending requirements will continue to be financed primarily through internally generated funds. Debt or equity financing may be needed to fund additional development activities or to maintain our capital structure to ensure our financial flexibility.
We manage our capital structure to balance our cost of capital and the need for financial flexibility. The mix of debt and equity is intended to allow us to maintain ratings in the “A” category from the primary rating agencies. Although conditions in the credit markets during recent years did not have a significant impact on our ability to obtain financing, such conditions, along with our need to finance acquisitions and our purchase of licenses acquired in the 700 MHz auction, resulted in higher fixed interest rates on borrowings than those we have paid in recent years. We believe that we will continue to have the necessary access to capital markets.
Our available external financing arrangements include the issuance of commercial paper, credit available under credit facilities and other bank lines of credit, vendor financing arrangements, issuances of registered debt or equity securities and privately-placed capital market securities. We currently have a shelf registration available for the issuance of up to $4.0 billion of additional unsecured debt or equity securities. We may also issue short-term debt through an active commercial paper program and have a $6.2 billion credit facility to support such commercial paper issuances.
Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities |
Our primary source of funds continues to be cash generated from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 increased by $2.7$2.1 billion compared to the similar period in 2009 primarily driven bydue to higher operating cash flows at Domestic Wireless, changes in working capital related in part to management of inventory and the timing of tax payments. Partially offsetting these increases were lower operating cash flows at Wireline, as well as lower dividendsWireline.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we received compared to the similar period in 2009.
We anticipate that we may receive an additional distributionnet distributions from Vodafone Omnitel N.V. within the next twelve months.of $0.4 billion.
Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities |
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures continue to be our primary use of capital resources as they facilitate the introduction of new products and services, enhance responsiveness to competitive challenges and increase the operating efficiency and productivity of our networks. We are directing our capital spending primarily toward higher growth markets.
Capital expenditures, including capitalized software, were as follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Domestic Wireless | $ | 4,032 | $ | 3,334 | $ | 6,205 | $ | 5,134 | ||||||||
Wireline | 3,347 | 4,341 | 5,098 | 6,614 | ||||||||||||
Other | 306 | 419 | 540 | 702 | ||||||||||||
$ | 7,685 | $ | 8,094 | $ | 11,843 | $ | 12,450 | |||||||||
Total as a percentage of revenue | 14.3 | % | 15.1 | % | 14.8 | % | 15.4 | % |
The increase in capital expenditures at Domestic Wireless during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in 2009 was primarily due to the continuedincreased investment in the capacity of our wireless Evolution-Data Optimized networks and funding the build-out of our fourth generation network based on Long-Term Evolution technology. The decrease in capital expenditures at Wireline during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in 2009 was primarily due to lower capital expenditures related to FiOS and legacy spending requirements. We continue to expect 2010 capital expenditures to be inat the low end or slightly below the targeted range of $16.8 billion to $17.2 billion range.billion.
Dispositions
During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we received cash proceeds of $2.6 billion in connection with the required divestitures of overlapping properties as a result of the acquisition of Alltel (see “Recent Developments”).
Acquisitions
On August 23, 2010, Verizon Wireless acquired the net assets and related customers of six operating markets in Louisiana and Mississippi in a transaction with AT&T Inc. for cash consideration of $0.2 billion.
On January 9, 2009, Verizon Wireless paid approximately $5.9 billion for the equity of Alltel, which was partially offset by $1.0 billion of cash acquired at closing.
Cash Flows Used In Financing Activities |
During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and 2009, net cash used in financing activities was $8.5$11.7 billion and $9.8$13.7 billion, respectively. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, $0.3 billion of 6.125% Verizon New York Inc. debentures, $0.2 billion of 6.375% Verizon North Inc. debentures and $0.2 billion of 6.30% Verizon Northwest Inc. debentures matured and were repaid. In addition, during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, we paid $2.7$4.0 billion in dividends.
During July 2010, Verizon received approximately $3.1 billion in connection with the completion of the spin-off and merger of Spinco (see “Recent Developments”). This special cash payment was subsequently used to redeem $2.0 billion of 7.25% Verizon Communications notes due December 2010 at a redemption price of 102.7% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption, as well as other short-term borrowings.
Verizon Wireless
On June 28, 2010, Verizon Wireless exercised its right to redeem the outstanding $1.0 billion of aggregate floating rate notes due June 2011 at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption. In addition, during the second quarter ofnine months ended September 30, 2010, Verizon Wireless repaid $2.8$4.0 billion of borrowings that were outstanding under a three-year term loan facility, reducing thefacility. No borrowings remain outstanding borrowings under this facility to approximately $1.2 billion at Juneas of September 30, 2010. During July 2010 Verizon Wireless repaid $0.7 billion of borrowings underand this facility reducing the outstanding borrowings under this facility to $0.5 billion.has been cancelled.
Credit Facility and Shelf Registration
On April 14, 2010, we terminated all commitments under our previous $5.3 billion 364-day credit facility with a syndicate of lenders and entered into a new $6.2 billion three-year credit facility with a group of major financial institutions. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the unused borrowing capacity under the three-year credit facility was approximately $6.1 billion.
The credit facility does not require us to comply with financial covenants or maintain specified credit ratings, and it permits us to borrow even if our business has incurred a material adverse change. We use the credit facility to support the issuance of commercial paper, for the issuance of letters of credit and for general corporate purposes.
We have a shelf registration available for the issuance of up to $4.0 billion of additional unsecured debt or equity securities.
Verizon’s ratio of debt to debt combined with Verizon’s equity was 59.4%58.4% at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 compared to 59.9% at December 31, 2009.
As in prior periods, dividend payments were a significant use of capital resources. The Board of Directors of Verizon determines the appropriateness of the level of our dividend payments on a periodic basis by considering such factors as long-term growth opportunities, internal cash requirements and the expectations of our shareowners. During the third quarter of 2010, the Board increased our quarterly dividend payment 2.6% to $.4875 per share from $.475 per share in the same period of 2009.
Credit Ratings
In August 2010, Standard & Poor’s placed the ratings of Verizon Communications and subsidiaries on CreditWatch with negative implications, including its ‘A’ long-term rating and ‘A-1’ short-term rating. There were no other changes to the outlooks or credit ratings of Verizon Communications and/or Cellco Partnership from those discussed in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The three primary rating agencies have identified factors which they believe could result in a ratings downgrade for Verizon Communications and/or Cellco Partnership in the future including sustained leverage levels at Verizon Communications and/or Cellco Partnership resulting from: (i) diminished wireless operating performance as a result of a weakening economy and competitive pressures; (ii) failure to achieve significant synergies in the Alltel integration; (iii) accelerated wireline losses; (iv) the absence of material improvement in the status of underfunded pensions and other post employment benefits; or (v) an acquisition or sale of operations that causes a material deterioration in its credit metrics. A ratings downgrade may increase the cost of refinancing existing debt and might constrain Verizon Communications’ access to certain short-term debt markets. Securities ratings assigned by rating organizations are expressions of opinion and are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities. A securities rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Covenants
Our credit agreements contain covenants that are typical for large, investment grade companies. These covenants include requirements to pay interest and principal in a timely fashion, to pay taxes, to maintain insurance with responsible and reputable insurance companies, to preserve our corporate existence, to keep appropriate books and records of financial transactions, to maintain our properties, to provide financial and other reports to our lenders, to limit pledging and disposition of assets and mergers and consolidations, and other similar covenants.
In addition, Verizon Wireless is required to maintain on the last day of any period of four fiscal quarters a leverage ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other adjustments, as defined in the related credit agreement, not in excess of 3.25 times based on the preceding twelve months. At June 30, 2010, the leverage ratio was 0.7 times.
We and our consolidated subsidiaries are in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
Increase |
Our Cash and cash equivalents at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 totaled $4.8$5.4 billion, a $2.8$3.4 billion increase compared to Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 for the reasons discussed above.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that management believes is useful to investors and other users of Verizon’s financial information in evaluating cash available to pay debt and dividends. Free cash flow is calculated by subtracting capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow:
Six Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 16,873 | $ | 14,137 | $ | 2,736 | $ | 25,213 | $ | 23,118 | $ | 2,095 | ||||||||||
Less Capital expenditures (including capitalized software) | 7,685 | 8,094 | (409 | ) | 11,843 | 12,450 | (607 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 9,188 | $ | 6,043 | $ | 3,145 | $ | 13,370 | $ | 10,668 | $ | 2,702 | ||||||||||
Market Risk |
We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of business, including the impact of interest rate changes, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes in investment, equity and commodity prices and changes in corporate tax rates. We employ risk management strategies, which may include the use of a variety of derivatives including cross currency swaps, foreign currency and prepaid forwards and collars, interest rate and commodity swap agreements and interest rate locks. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes.
It is our general policy to enter into interest rate, foreign currency and other derivative transactions only to the extent necessary to achieve our desired objectives in limiting our exposure to various market risks. Our objectives include maintaining a mix of fixed and variable rate debt to lower borrowing costs within reasonable risk parameters and to protect against earnings and cash flow volatility resulting from changes in market conditions. We do not hedge our market risk exposure in a manner that would completely eliminate the effect of changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates on our earnings. We do not expect that our net income, liquidity and cash flows will be materially affected by these risk management strategies.
The functional currency for our foreign operations is primarily the local currency. The translation of income statement and balance sheet amounts of our foreign operations into U.S. dollars are recorded as cumulative translation adjustments, which are included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recorded in the consolidated statements of income in Other income and (expense), net. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, our primary translation exposure was to the British Pound Sterling, the Euro and the Australian Dollar.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates, primarily on our short-term debt and the portion of long-term debt that carries floating interest rates. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, more than two-thirds in aggregate principal amount of our total debt portfolio consisted of fixed rate indebtedness, including the effect of interest rate swap agreements designated as hedges. The impact of a 100 basis point change in interest rates affecting our floating rate debt would result in a change in annual interest expense, including our interest rate swap agreements that are designated as hedges, of approximately $97$74 million. The interest rates on our existing long-term debt obligations with the exception of a three-year term loan, are unaffected by changes to our credit ratings.
Interest Rate Swaps
We have entered into domestic interest rate swaps to achieve a targeted mix of fixed and variable rate debt, where we principally receive fixed rates and pay variable rates based on London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).Rate. These swaps are designated as fair value hedges and hedge against changes in the fair value of our debt portfolio. We record the interest rate swaps at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded to Interest expense, which are offset by changes in the fair value of the debt due to changes in interest rates. The fair value of these contracts was $373$465 million and $171 million at JuneSeptember 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and are primarily included in Other assets and Long-term debt. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the total notional amount of these interest rate swaps was $6.0 billion.
Forward Interest Rate Swaps
In order to manage our exposure to future interest rate changes, beginning in late September 2010 through October 25, 2010, we entered into forward interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $1,250 million. We have designated these contracts as cash flow hedges.
Cross Currency Swaps
Verizon Wireless has entered into cross currency swaps designated as cash flow hedges to exchange approximately $2.4 billion of the net proceeds from a debt offering of British Pound Sterling and Euro denominated debt into U.S. dollars and to fix our future interest and principal payments in U.S. dollars, as well as mitigate the impact of foreign currency transaction gains or losses. The fair value of these swaps included in Other assets and Other liabilities was approximately $34$139 million and $103 million, respectively, at June 30, 2010. The fair value of these swaps included in Other assets was approximately $315 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.2009, respectively. During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, a pretax gain of $207 million and a pretax loss of $239 million and $383$176 million, respectively, was recognized in Other comprehensive income, a portion of which was reclassified to Other income and (expense), net to offset the related pretax foreign currency transaction gain or loss on the underlying debt obligations.
Other Factors That May Affect Future Results |
Recent Developments |
Telephone Access Lines Spin-off
On May 13, 2009, we announced plans to spin off a newly formed subsidiary of Verizon (Spinco) to our stockholders and for Spinco to merge with Frontier Communications Corporation (Frontier) immediately following the spin-off pursuant to a definitive agreement with Frontier, with Frontier to be the surviving corporation.
On July 1, 2010, after receiving regulatory approval, we completed the spin-off of the shares of Spinco to Verizon stockholders and the merger of Spinco with Frontier, resulting in Verizon stockholders collectively owning approximately 68 percent of Frontier’s equity which was outstanding immediately following the merger. Frontier issued approximately 678.5 million shares of Frontier common stock in the aggregate to Verizon stockholders in the merger, and Verizon stockholders received one share of Frontier common stock for every 4.165977 shares of Verizon common stock they owned as of June 7, 2010. Verizon stockholders have received cash in lieu of any fraction of a share of Frontier common stock to which they otherwise were entitled.
At the time of the spin-off and the merger, Spinco held defined assets and liabilities of the local exchange business and related landline activities of Verizon in Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin, and in portions of California bordering Arizona, Nevada and Oregon, including Internet access and long distance services and broadband video provided to designated customers in those areas. The transactions did not involve any assets or liabilities of Verizon Wireless. The merger resulted in Frontier acquiring approximately 4 million access lines and certain related businesses from Verizon, which collectively generated annual revenues of approximately $4 billion for Verizon’s Wireline segment during 2009.2009, and approximately $1.7 billion of revenue for Verizon’s Wireline segment during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Pursuant to the terms of Verizon’s equity incentive plans, shortly following the closing of the spin-off and the merger, the number of outstanding and unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance stock units (PSUs) held by current and former Verizon employees (including Verizon employees who became employees of Frontier in connection with the merger) was increased to reflect a number of additional units approximately equal to the cash value of the Frontier common stock that the holders of the RSUs and PSUs would have received with respect to hypothetical shares of Verizon common stock subject to awards under those plans. In addition, the exercise prices and number of shares of Verizon common stock underlying stock options to purchase shares of Verizon common stock previously granted to employees under equity incentive plans were adjusted pursuant to the terms of those plans to take into account the decrease in the value of Verizon common stock immediately following the spin-off and merger.
The total value of the transaction to Verizon and its stockholders was approximately $8.6 billion. Verizon stockholders received $5.247 billion in Frontier common stock (based on the valuation formula contained in the merger agreement with Frontier) as described above, and Verizon received $3.333 billion in aggregate value, comprised of $3.083 billion in the form of a special cash payment from Spinco and $250 million in a reduction in Verizon’s consolidated indebtedness.
On April 12, 2010, Spinco completed a financing of $3.2 billion in principal amount of notes. The gross proceeds of the offering were deposited into an escrow account. Immediately prior to the spin-off on July 1, 2010, the funds in the escrow account representing the net cash proceeds from the offering were released to Spinco, and Spinco used substantially all of those proceeds to make the special cash payment to Verizon noted above.Verizon.
Alltel Divestiture Markets
As a condition of the regulatory approvals by the DOJ and the FCC to complete the acquisition of Alltel in January 2009, Verizon Wireless was required to divest overlapping properties in 105 operating markets in 24 states. Total assets and total liabilities divested were $2.6 billion and $0.1 billion, respectively, principally comprised of network assets, wireless licenses and customer relationships that were included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other current liabilities, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009.
On May 8, 2009, Verizon Wireless entered into a definitive agreement with AT&T Mobility, pursuant to which AT&T Mobility agreed to acquire 79 of the 105 Alltel Divestiture Markets, including licenses and network assets, for approximately $2.4 billion in cash. On June 9, 2009, Verizon Wireless entered into a definitive agreement with ATN, pursuant to which ATN agreed to acquire the remaining 26 Alltel Divestiture Markets, including licenses and network assets, for $200 million in cash. During the second quarter of 2010, Verizon Wireless received the necessary regulatory approvals and completed both transactions.
Environmental Matters
During 2003, under a government-approved plan, remediation commenced at the site of a former Sylvania facility in Hicksville, New York that processed nuclear fuel rods in the 1950s and 1960s. Remediation beyond original expectations proved to be necessary and a reassessment of the anticipated remediation costs was conducted. A reassessment of costs related to remediation efforts at several other former facilities was also undertaken. In September 2005, the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) accepted the Hicksville site into the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. This may result in the ACE performing some or all of the remediation effort for the Hicksville site with a corresponding decrease in costs to Verizon. To the extent that the ACE assumes responsibility for remedial work at the Hicksville site, an adjustment to a reserve previously established for the remediation may be made. Adjustments to the reserve may also be made based upon actual conditions discovered during the remediation at this or any other site requiring remediation.
Other
On August 23, 2010, Verizon Wireless acquired the net assets and related customers of six operating markets in Louisiana and Mississippi in a transaction with AT&T Inc. for cash consideration of $235 million. These assets were acquired to enhance Verizon Wireless’ network coverage in these operating markets. The preliminary purchase price allocation primarily resulted in $106 million of wireless licenses and $76 million in goodwill.
Regulatory and Competitive Trends |
There have been no material changes to Regulatory and Competitive Trends as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1. “Business” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 except as set forth below.
FCC Regulation
Broadband
The FCC has adopted a seriesand in Part I. Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of orders that recognize the competitive natureFinancial Condition and Results of the broadband market and impose lesser regulatory requirements on broadband services and facilities than apply to narrowband or traditional telephone services. With respect to facilities, the FCC has determined that certain unbundling requirements that apply to narrowband facilities of local exchange carriers do not apply to broadband facilities such as fiber to the premise loops and packet switches. With respect to services, the FCC previously has concluded that both wireline and wireless broadband Internet access services qualify as largely deregulated information services. Separately, certain of our wireline broadband services sold primarily to larger business customers were largely deregulated when our forbearance petition was deemed granted by operation of law. The latter relief has been upheld on appeal, but is subject to a continuing challenge before the FCC.
In June 2010, the FCC initiated a new inquiry to determine whether broadband services should be “reclassified” as common carrier services subject to the requirements of Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The FCC also asked whether, if it reclassified broadband services, it should forbear from applying some but not all of the requirements of Title II. Any change in the current classification could have a significant adverse effect on our broadband business, restrict our ability to compete in the marketplace and limit the return we can expect to achieve on past and future investmentsOperations” in our broadband networks.
State Regulation and Local Approvals
Telephone Operations
State public utility commissions regulate our telephone operations with respect to certain telecommunications intrastate rates and services and other matters. Our competitive local exchange carrier and long distance operations are generally classified as nondominant and lightly regulatedQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the same as other similarly situated carriers. Our incumbent local exchange operations are generally classified as dominant. These latter operations (California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Virginia) are subject to various levels of pricing flexibility, deregulation, detariffing, and service quality standards. None of the states are subject to earnings regulation.
Video
Companies that provide cable service over a cable system are typically subject to state and/or local cable television rules and regulations. As noted above, cable operators generally must obtain a local cable franchise from each local unit of government prior to providing cable service in that local area. Some states have enacted legislation that enables cable operators to apply for, and obtain, a single cable franchise at the state, rather than local, level. To date, Verizon has applied for and received state-issued franchises in California, Florida, New Jersey, Texas and the unincorporated areas of Delaware. We also have obtained authorization from the state commission in Rhode Island to provide cable service in certain areas in that state, have obtained required state commission approvals for our local franchises in New York, and will need to obtain additional state commission approvals in these states to provide cable service in additional areas. Virginia law provides us the option of entering a given franchise area using state standards if local franchise negotiations are unsuccessful.quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Recent Accounting Standards |
In July 2010, the accounting standard update regarding disclosures for finance receivables and allowances for credit losses was issued. This standard update requires that entities disclose information at more disaggregated levels than currently required. We will adopt this standard update during the fourth quarter of 2010. The adoption of this standard update is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the accounting standard update regarding revenue recognition for multiple deliverable arrangements was issued. This update requires the use of the relative selling price method when allocating revenue in these types of arrangements. This method allows a vendor to use its best estimate of selling price if neither vendor specific objective evidence nor third party evidence of selling price exists when evaluating multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact that this standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the accounting standard update regarding revenue recognition for arrangements that include software elements was issued. This update requires tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that work together to deliver the products’ essential functionality to be evaluated under the accounting standard regarding multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact that this standard update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements |
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we have made forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our estimates and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations. Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “hopes” or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The following important factors, along with those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and those disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 could affect future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
the effects of adverse conditions in the U.S. and international economies;
the effects of competition in our markets;
materially adverse changes in labor matters, including workforce levels and labor negotiations, and any resulting financial and/or operational impact, in the markets served by us or by companies in which we have substantial investments;
the effect of material changes in available technology;
any disruption of our suppliers’ provisioning of critical products or services;
significant increases in benefit plan costs or lower investment returns on plan assets;
the impact of natural or man-made disasters or existing or future litigation and any resulting financial impact not covered by insurance;
technology substitution;
an adverse change in the ratings afforded our debt securities by nationally accredited ratings organizations or adverse conditions in the credit markets impacting the cost, including interest rates, and/or availability of financing;
any changes in the regulatory environments in which we operate, including any loss of or inability to renew wireless licenses, and the final results of federal and state regulatory proceedings and judicial review of those results;
the timing, scope and financial impact of our deployment of fiber-to-the-premises broadband technology;
changes in our accounting assumptions that regulatory agencies, including the SEC, may require or that result from changes in the accounting rules or their application, which could result in an impact on earnings;
our ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions;
our ability to successfully integrate Alltel Corporation into Verizon Wireless’ business and achieve anticipated benefits of the acquisition; and
the inability to implement our business strategies.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information relating to market risk is included in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the caption “Market Risk.”
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of JuneSeptember 30, 2010.
There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting during the secondthird quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon), and a number of other telecommunications companies, have been the subject of multiple class action suits concerning its alleged participation in intelligence-gathering activities allegedly carried out by the federal government, at the direction of the President of the United States, as part of the government’s post-September 11 program to prevent terrorist attacks. Plaintiffs generally allege that Verizon has participated by permitting the government to gain access to the content of its subscribers’ telephone calls and/or records concerning those calls and that such action violates federal and/or state constitutional and statutory law. Relief sought in the cases includes injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and statutory and punitive damages. On August 9, 2006, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“Panel”)(Panel) ordered that these actions be transferred, consolidated and coordinated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Panel subsequently ordered that a number of “tag along” actions also be transferred to the Northern District of California. Verizon believes that these lawsuits are without merit. On July 10, 2008, the President signed into law the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which provides for dismissal of these suits by the court based on submission by the Attorney General of the United States of a specified certification. On September 19, 2008, the Attorney General made such a submission in the consolidated proceedings. Based on this submission, the court ordered dismissal of the complaints on June 3, 2009. Plaintiffs have appealed this dismissal, and the appeal remains pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
On September 15, 2010, the U.S. Bank National Association (U.S. Bank), as Litigation Trustee for the Idearc, Inc. Litigation Trust (Litigation Trust), filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against Verizon and certain subsidiaries challenging the November 2006 spin-off of Verizon’s former directories business then known as Idearc, Inc. U.S. Bank, which represents a group of creditors who filed claims in the Idearc, Inc. bankruptcy proceedings, alleges that Idearc, Inc. was insolvent at the time of the spin-off or became insolvent shortly thereafter. The Litigation Trust seeks over $9 billion in damages.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Verizon did not repurchase any shares of Verizon common stock during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010. At JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by Verizon or any “affiliated purchaser” of Verizon, as defined by Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, under our share buyback program was 60,015,938.
Exhibit
| Description | |
12 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. | ||||||
Date: | By |
| ||||
Robert J. Barish | ||||||
Senior Vice President and Controller | ||||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Description | |
12 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
3944