UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-33378

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		36-2517428
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2500 Lake Cook Road, Riverwoods, Illinois 60015		(224) 405-0900
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)		(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the ~~Act.)~~Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 25, 2011, there were ~~544,589,409~~545,485,833 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the quarterly period ended ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
Item 1. Financial Statements		1
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	43	39
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	81	65
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	82	66

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION	83	67
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	83	67
Item 1A. Risk Factors	83	67
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	84	67
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	84	67
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)	84	67
Item 5. Other Information	84	67
Item 6. Exhibits	84	67

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, “Discover Financial Services,” “Discover,” “DFS,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to Discover Financial Services and its subsidiaries.

We own or have rights to use the trademarks, trade names and service marks that we use in conjunction with the operation of our business, including, but not limited to: Discover^®, PULSE^®, Cashback Bonus^®, Discover^® More^® Card, Discover^® Motiva^SMCard, Discover^® Open Road^® Card, Discover^® Network and Diners Club International^®. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective owners.

Part I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition


	February 28, 2011			November 30, 2010
	(unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,171,425		$	5,098,733
Restricted cash		676,074			1,363,758
Other short-term investments		375,000			375,000
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $5,188,830 and $4,989,958 at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively)		5,177,116			5,002,579
Held-to-maturity (fair value of $59,991 and $70,195 at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively)		63,765			72,816

Total investments securities		5,240,881			5,075,395
Loan receivables:
Loans held for sale		766,661			788,101
Loan portfolio:
Credit card		44,317,247			45,156,994
Other		3,567,936			2,891,318
Purchased credit-impaired loans		3,011,384			0

Total loan portfolio		50,896,567			48,048,312

Total loan receivables		51,663,228			48,836,413
Allowance for loan losses		(3,033,459	)		(3,304,118	)

Net loan receivables		48,629,769			45,532,295
Premises and equipment, net		458,950			460,732
Goodwill		255,421			255,421
Intangible assets, net		193,293			188,973
Other assets		2,505,796			2,434,661

Total assets	$	63,506,609		$	60,784,968

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Interest-bearing deposit accounts	$	34,728,329		$	34,309,839
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts		130,665			103,544

Total deposits		34,858,994			34,413,383
Short-term borrowings		100,000			0
Long-term borrowings		18,990,170			17,705,728
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,658,280			2,209,011

Total liabilities		56,607,444			54,328,122
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 11)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 547,985,670 and 547,128,270 shares issued at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively		5,480			5,471
Additional paid-in capital		3,452,513			3,435,318
Retained earnings		3,580,338			3,126,488
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(106,279	)		(82,548	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,716,532 and 2,446,506 shares at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively		(32,887	)		(27,883	)

Total stockholders’ equity		6,899,165			6,456,846

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	63,506,609		$	60,784,968

The table below presents the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities of Discover Financial Services’ consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) which are included in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of the consolidated VIEs. The liabilities in the table below include third party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts for which creditors have recourse to the general credit of the Company.

   August 31,
2010 November 30,
2009

(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except
per share amounts)

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
   $ 7,916,091    $ 13,020,719
Restricted cash—special dividend escrow
   —      643,311
Restricted cash—for securitization investors
   691,698    —
Other short-term investments
   375,000    1,350,000
Investment securities:

Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $1,134,898 and $2,743,729 at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively)
   1,151,689    2,645,481
Held-to-maturity (fair value of $73,029 and $1,953,990 at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively)
   74,058    2,389,816

Total investments securities
   1,225,747    5,035,297
Loan receivables:

Student loans held for sale
   1,437,592    —
Loan portfolio:

Credit card—restricted for securitization investors
   34,789,458    —
Other credit card
   10,458,708    20,230,302

Total credit card loan receivables
   45,248,166    20,230,302
Other
   3,444,906    3,394,782

Total loan portfolio
   48,693,072    23,625,084

Total loan receivables
   50,130,664    23,625,084
Allowance for loan losses
   (3,743,721 ) (1,757,899 )

Net loan receivables
   46,386,943    21,867,185
Amounts due from asset securitization
   —      1,692,051
Premises and equipment, net
   456,943    499,303
Goodwill
   255,421    255,421
Intangible assets, net
   190,639    195,636
Other assets
   2,559,071    1,462,064

Total assets
   $ 60,057,553    $ 46,020,987

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Deposits:

Interest-bearing deposit accounts
   $ 34,148,932    $ 32,028,506
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts
   97,872    64,506

Total deposits
   34,246,804    32,093,012
Long-term borrowings:

Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors
   14,869,265    —
Other long-term borrowings
   2,839,488    2,428,101

Total long-term borrowings
   17,708,753    2,428,101
Special dividend—Morgan Stanley
   —      808,757
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
   1,990,699    2,255,570

Total liabilities
   53,946,256    37,585,440
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 13)

Stockholders’ Equity:

Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 0 and 1,224,558 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively
   —      1,158,066
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 546,991,067 and 544,799,041 shares issued at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively
   5,470    5,448
Additional paid-in capital
   3,428,089    3,573,231
Retained earnings
   2,787,822    3,873,262
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   (82,297 ) (154,818 )
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,440,632 and 1,876,795 shares at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively
   (27,787 ) (19,642 )

Total stockholders’ equity
   6,111,297    8,435,547

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
   $ 60,057,553    $ 46,020,987


	February 28, 2011			November 30, 2010
	(unaudited) (dollars in thousands)
Assets
Restricted cash	$	676,074		$	1,363,758
Credit card loan receivables		33,400,781			34,452,989
Other loan receivables		3,006,809			0
Allowance for loan losses allocated to securitized loan receivables		(2,207,480	)		(2,431,399	)
Other assets		34,421			24,083

Liabilities
Long-term borrowings	$	16,531,018		$	14,919,400

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,					For the Nine Months Ended August 31,
	2010		2009			2010		2009			For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	(unaudited)										2011		2010
	(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)										(unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Interest income:
Credit card loans	$	1,455,907	$	761,477		$	4,423,654	$	2,276,152		$	1,417,116	$	1,491,887
Other loans		67,588		43,397			183,150		119,271			119,536		52,668
Investment securities		5,574		18,062			15,966		51,606			12,215		5,328
Other interest income		6,870		10,281			24,101		59,965			4,097		9,267

Total interest income		1,535,939		833,217			4,646,871		2,506,994			1,552,964		1,559,150
Interest expense:
Deposits		279,137		289,518			882,921		894,767			256,695		305,449
Short-term borrowings		—		10			—		2,538			46		0
Long-term borrowings		110,000		14,873			324,561		39,821			125,987		108,275

Total interest expense		389,137		304,401			1,207,482		937,126			382,728		413,724

Net interest income		1,146,802		528,816			3,439,389		1,569,868			1,170,236		1,145,426
Provision for loan losses		712,565		380,999			2,824,035		1,962,673			417,709		1,387,206

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		434,237		147,817			615,354		(392,805	)

Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses												752,527		(241,780	)
Other income:
Securitization income		—		567,288			—		1,310,435
Discount and interchange revenue		273,932		51,641			805,209		208,802			260,916		261,991
Fee products		104,132		78,875			309,590		228,899			108,553		104,095
Loan fee income		92,465		75,528			267,483		195,843			85,600		105,285
Transaction processing revenue		40,184		31,839			109,570		93,309			42,551		32,918
Merchant fees		7,220		10,716			23,091		35,289			4,655		8,445
Gain (loss) on investment securities		18,951		(7,422	)		19,131		(9,239	)		141		180
Antitrust litigation settlement		—		472,167			—		1,419,783
Other income		27,260		35,328			88,790		103,915			60,208		32,962

Total other income		564,144		1,315,960			1,622,864		3,587,036			562,624		545,876
Other expense:
Employee compensation and benefits		204,210		208,528			602,510		636,167			213,075		195,764
Marketing and business development		130,532		77,814			313,175		292,169			135,665		84,673
Information processing and communications		62,357		67,679			190,862		217,017			64,717		65,418
Professional fees		85,289		83,746			239,169		228,419			90,331		75,813
Premises and equipment		17,722		18,437			53,273		54,732			17,248		17,860
Other expense		66,128		67,634			155,601		215,085			74,112		35,276

Total other expense		566,238		523,838			1,554,590		1,643,589			595,148		474,804

Income before income tax expense		432,143		939,939			683,628		1,550,642
Income tax expense		171,526		362,485			268,482		626,994
Income (loss) before income tax expense												720,003		(170,708	)
Income tax expense (benefit)												255,111		(67,170	)

Net income	$	260,617	$	577,454		$	415,146	$	923,648
Net income (loss)											$	464,892	$	(103,538	)

Net income allocated to common stockholders	$	258,194	$	552,928		$	321,613	$	876,506		$	459,428	$	(122,233	)

Basic earnings per share	$	0.47	$	1.08		$	0.59	$	1.78		$	0.84	$	(0.22	)
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.47	$	1.07		$	0.58	$	1.78		$	0.84	$	(0.22	)
Dividends paid per share of common stock	$	0.02	$	0.02		$	0.06	$	0.10
Dividends paid per share											$	0.02	$	0.02

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity


	Preferred Stock					Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital				Retained Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity				Preferred Stock							Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares		Amount			Shares	Amount						Retained Earnings				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Shares							Amount				Shares			Amount					Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	(unaudited)																											(unaudited) (dollars and shares in thousands)
	(dollars and shares in thousands)
Balance at November 30, 2008	—		$	—		480,517	$	4,805	Additional Paid-in Capital			$	2,938,657			$	3,046,956			$	Treasury Stock	(66,338	)	Total Stockholders’ Equity	$	(8,257	)		$	5,915,823
Adoption of the measurement date provision of ASC 715 (FASB Statement No. 158), net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				(1,110	)			—				—			(1,110	)
Balance at November 30, 2009																													1,225			$	1,158,066			544,799	$	5,448	$	3,573,231	$	3,873,262		$	(154,818	)	$	(19,642	)	$	8,435,547
Adoption of ASC 810 (FASB Statement No. 167), net of tax																													0				0			0		0		0		(1,411,117	)		78,561			0			(1,332,556	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—			—		—		��		—				923,648				—				—			923,648
Net loss																													0				0			0		0		0		(103,538	)		0			0			(103,538	)
Adjustments related to investment securities, net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				—				41,605				—							0				0			0		0		0		0			2,160			0
Adjustment related to pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				—				(239	)			—
Adjustments related to pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax																													0				0			0		0		0		0			59			0

Other comprehensive income	—			—		—		—		—				—				41,366				—			41,366				0				0			0		0		0		0			2,219			0			2,219

Total comprehensive income	—			—		—		—		—				—				—				—			965,014
Purchase of treasury stock	—			—		—		—		—				—				—				(10,348	)		(10,348	)
Total comprehensive loss																													0				0			0		0		0		0			0			0			(101,319	)
Purchases of treasury stock																													0				0			0		0		0		0			0			(5,383	)		(5,383	)
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans	—			—		99		1		913				—				—				—			914				0				0			22		0		285		0			0			0			285
Common stock issued and stock-based compensation expense	—			—		3,885		40		33,803				120				—				—			33,963				0				0			1,201		12		10,996		0			0			0			11,008
Income tax deficiency on stock-based compensation plans	—			—		—		—		(18,494	)			—				—				—			(18,494	)
Issuance of common stock	—			—		60,054		600		533,240				—				—				—			533,840
Dividends paid—common stock	—			—		—		—		—				(48,885	)			—				—			(48,885	)			0				0			0		0		0		(10,984	)		0			0			(10,984	)
Issuance of preferred stock	1,225			1,148,691		—		—		75,867				—				—				—			1,224,558
Accretion of preferred stock discount	—			6,048		—		—		—				(6,048	)			—				—			—				0				3,388			0		0		0		(3,388	)		0			0			0
Dividends—preferred stock	—					—		—		—				(28,573	)			—				—			(28,573	)			0				0			0		0		0		(15,307	)		0			0			(15,307	)
Special dividend—Morgan Stanley	—			—		—		—		—				(180,500	)			—				—			(180,500	)			0				0			0		0		0		33,757			0			0			33,757

Balance at August 31, 2009	1,225		$	1,151,739		544,555	$	5,446	$	3,563,986			$	3,705,608			$	(24,972	)		$	(18,605	)	$	8,386,202
Balance at February 28, 2010																													1,225			$	1,161,454			546,022	$	5,460	$	3,584,512	$	2,362,685		$	(74,038	)	$	(25,025	)	$	7,015,048

Balance at November 30, 2009	1,225		$	1,158,066		544,799	$	5,448	$	3,573,231			$	3,873,262			$	(154,818	)		$	(19,642	)	$	8,435,547
Adoption of ASC 810 (FASB Statement No. 167), net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				(1,411,117	)			78,561				—			(1,332,556	)
Balance at November 30, 2010																													0			$	0			547,128	$	5,471	$	3,435,318	$	3,126,488		$	(82,548	)	$	(27,883	)	$	6,456,846
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—			—		—		—		—				415,146				—				—			415,146				0				0			0		0		0		464,892			0			0			464,892
Adjustments related to investment securities, net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				—				(6,276	)			—							0				0			0		0		0		0			(15,247	)		0
Adjustments related to cash flow hedges, net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				—				158				—							0				0			0		0		0		0			(8,826	)		0
Adjustments related to pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax	—			—		—		—		—				—				78				—							0				0			0		0		0		0			342			0

Other comprehensive loss	—			—		—		—		—				—				(6,040	)			—			(6,040	)			0				0			0		0		0		0			(23,731	)		0			(23,731	)

Total comprehensive income	—			—		—		—		—				—				—				—			409,106				0				0			0		0		0		0			0			0			441,161
Purchase of treasury stock	—			—		—		—		—				—				—				(8,145	)		(8,145	)
Purchases of treasury stock																													0				0			0		0		0		0			0			(5,004	)		(5,004	)
Common stock issued under employee benefit plans	—			—		67		1		867				—				—				—			868				0				0			13		0		271		0			0			0			271
Common stock issued and stock based compensation expense	—			—		2,125		21		29,402				—				—				—			29,423
Income tax deficiency on stock-based compensation plans	—			—		—		—		(3,411	)			—				—				—			(3,411	)
Common stock issued and stock-based compensation expense																													0				0			845		9		16,924		0			0			0			16,933
Dividends paid—common stock	—			—		—		—		—				(32,923	)			—				—			(32,923	)			0				0			0		0		0		(11,042	)		0			0			(11,042	)
Accretion of preferred stock discount	—			66,492		—		—		—				(66,492	)			—				—			—
Dividends—preferred stock	—					—		—		—				(23,811	)			—				—			(23,811	)
Redemption of preferred stock	(1,225	)		(1,224,558	)	—		—		—				—				—				—			(1,224,558	)
Repurchase of stock warrant	—			—		—		—		(172,000	)			—				—				—			(172,000	)
Special dividend—Morgan Stanley	—			—		—		—		—				33,757				—				—			33,757

Balance at August 31, 2010	—		$	—		546,991	$	5,470	$	3,428,089			$	2,787,822			$	(82,297	)		$	(27,787	)	$	6,111,297
Balance at February 28, 2011																													0			$	0			547,986	$	5,480	$	3,452,513	$	3,580,338		$	(106,279	)	$	(32,887	)	$	6,899,165

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	For the Nine Months Ended August 31,						For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010			2009			2011			2010
	(unaudited) (dollars in thousands)						(unaudited) (dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	415,146		$	923,648
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net principal disbursed on loans originated for sale		(147,058	)		—
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale		28,501			—
(Gain) loss on sale of student loans		(439	)		—
(Gain) loss on investment securities		(19,131	)		9,239
Loss on disposal of equipment		1,930			377
Stock-based compensation expense		29,554			34,877
Income tax deficiency on stock-based compensation expense		(3,411	)		(18,494	)
Net income (loss)							$	464,892		$	(103,538	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses								417,709			1,387,206
Deferred income taxes		63,131			(124,460	)		112,511			(100,918	)
Depreciation and amortization on premises and equipment		68,130			73,391			22,042			23,689
Amortization of deferred revenues								(60,351	)		(42,065	)
Other depreciation and amortization		57,947			94,199			(21,036	)		18,737
Amortization of deferred revenues		(137,492	)		(109,761	)
Provision for loan losses		2,824,035			1,962,673
(Gain) loss on investment securities								(141	)		(180	)
Loss (gain) on equipment								123			33
Stock-based compensation expense								11,875			11,293
Gain on purchase of business								(15,917	)		0
Net change in loans originated for sale								21,440			0
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in amounts due from asset securitization		—			296,817
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(230,385	)		(90,970	)		(43,733	)		(170,051	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(243,696	)		(455,387	)		369,669			110,896

Net cash provided by operating activities		2,706,762			2,596,149			1,279,083			1,135,102
Cash flows from investing activities
Maturities of other short-term investments		1,350,000			—			0			1,175,000
Purchases of other short-term investments		(375,000	)		—
Maturities of available-for-sale investment securities		540,526			150,520
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale investment securities								332,954			68,214
Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities		(1,239,631	)		(478,888	)		(542,025	)		(269,310	)
Maturities of held-to-maturity investment securities		19,779			59,056			9,072			4,433
Purchases of held-to-maturity investment securities		(549	)		(1,269	)
Net principal disbursed on loans held for investment		(2,035,023	)		(5,652,206	)		(7,185	)		(291,098	)
Proceeds from securitization		—			2,246,100
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash—special dividend escrow		643,311			(502,292	)
Decrease in restricted cash—for securitization investors		547,064			—
Purchase of loan receivables								(395,658	)		0
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired								(366,049	)		0
Decrease in restricted cash—special dividend escrow								0			643,311
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash—for securitization investors								884,950			(2,437,239	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		146			1,247			13			0
Purchases of premises and equipment		(29,538	)		(41,653	)		(15,586	)		(7,826	)

Net cash used for investing activities		(578,915	)		(4,219,385	)		(99,514	)		(1,114,515	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock		—			1,148,691
Redemption of preferred stock		(1,224,558	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of warrant		—			75,867
Repurchase of warrant		(172,000	)		—
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings								100,000			0
Proceeds from issuance of securitized debt		1,000,000			—			500,000			750,000
Maturities of securitized debt		(8,560,528	)		—			(1,819,185	)		(3,142,983	)
Proceeds from issuance of other long-term borrowings		1,003,427			400,000
Net (decrease) in short-term borrowings		—			(500,000	)
Maturities of other long-term borrowings		(590,676	)		(339,298	)		(315,028	)		(71,930	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			533,840			931			0
Purchase of treasury stock		(8,145	)		(10,348	)
Net increase in deposits		1,177,096			1,046,320
Proceeds from acquisition of deposits		976,627			—
Purchases of treasury stock								(5,004	)		(5,383	)
Net increase (decrease) in deposits								442,435			2,958,602
Dividend paid to Morgan Stanley		(775,000	)		—			0			(775,000	)
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock		(59,455	)		(74,737	)		(11,026	)		(26,291	)
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation		737			—

Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities		(7,232,475	)		2,280,335
Net cash used for financing activities								(1,106,877	)		(312,985	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(5,104,628	)		657,099
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents								72,692			(292,398	)
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		13,020,719			10,171,143			5,098,733			13,020,719

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	7,916,091		$	10,828,242		$	5,171,425		$	12,728,321

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest expense	$	1,125,181		$	929,542		$	383,757		$	369,924

Income taxes, net of income tax refunds	$	112,027		$	531,826		$	38,209		$	14,141

Non-cash transactions:
Post-closing adjustment payable—SLC acquisition							$	35,108		$	0

Assumption of SLC debt							$	2,921,372		$	0

Special dividend—Morgan Stanley	$	33,757		$	(180,500	)	$	0		$	33,757
Acquisition of certificated beneficial interests in DCENT and DCMT, net of maturities	$	—		$	1,647,783

See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

1.	Background and Basis of Presentation

Description of Business. Discover Financial Services (“DFS” or the “Company”) is a ~~leading credit card issuer in the United States~~direct banking and ~~an electronic~~ payment services company. The Company is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The Company is subject to oversight, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Through its Discover Bank subsidiary, a Delaware state-chartered bank, the Company offers its customers credit cards, ~~other consumer~~student loans, personal loans and deposit products. Through its DFS Services LLC subsidiary and its subsidiaries, the Company operates the Discover Network, the PULSE Network (“PULSE”) and Diners Club International (“Diners Club”). The Discover Network ~~provides credit~~is a payment card transaction processing network for Discover card-branded and third-party issued credit, debit and prepaid cards. PULSE operates an electronic funds transfer network, providing financial institutions issuing debit cards on the PULSE network with access to ATMs domestically and internationally, as well as point of sale terminals at retail locations throughout the U.S. for debit card transactions. Diners Club is a global payments network ~~that grants rights to~~of licensees, which are generally financial institutions, tothat issue Diners Club branded credit cards and/or to provide card acceptance services. ~~The Diners Club business also offers transaction processing and marketing services to licensees globally.~~

The Company’s business segments are Direct Banking and Payment Services. The Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses on the Discover Network and other consumer products and services, including personal loans, student loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary. The Payment Services segment includes PULSE, Diners Club and the Company’s third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the quarter. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company believes that the estimates used in the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s ~~2009~~2010 audited consolidated financial statements filed with the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, ~~2009.~~2010.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The application of the following guidance will only affect disclosures and therefore will not impact the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2010, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-20,Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.ASU No. 2010-20 requires a greater level of disaggregation in disclosures relating to the credit quality of the Company’s financing receivables and allowance for loan losses. ~~Furthermore,~~ ASU 2010-20 also requires enhanced disclosures around nonaccrual and past due financing receivables and impaired ~~loans~~loans. The Company has included the new required disclosures in Note 4: Loan Receivables. ASU 2010-20 also requires enhanced disclosures around troubled debt restructurings. However, the FASB announced that the effective date related to those disclosures would be deferred and ~~loan modifications. The standard~~would instead have an effective date concurrent with that of the

proposed ASU,Receivables (Topic 310): Clarifications to Accounting for Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for ~~the first~~ interim orand annual ~~reporting~~ periods ending ~~on or~~ after ~~December~~June 15, ~~2010, and will apply beginning with the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28,~~ 2011.

~~In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06,~~~~Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements~~. ASU 2010-06 revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. The Company’s disclosures about fair value measurements, including the new disclosures which were applicable to the Company beginning in the second quarter 2010, are presented in Note 15: Fair Value Disclosures. The disclosures concerning gross presentation of Level 3 activity are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.

~~In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1,~~~~Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets~~~~(codified within Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 715,~~~~Compensation-Retirement Benefits~~). This standard provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. Required disclosures include a description of how investment allocation decisions are made, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets and significant concentrations of risk. The standard is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009 and will first apply to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ending November 30, 2010.

2.	~~Change in Accounting Principle~~Business Combinations

~~In June 2009,~~On December 31, 2010, the ~~FASB issued Statement~~Company acquired The Student Loan Corporation (“SLC”), which is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of ~~Financial Accounting Standards No. 166,~~~~Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140~~~~(“Statement No. 166”, codified within ASC Topic 860,~~~~Transfers~~Discover Bank and ~~Servicing~~~~) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,~~~~Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)~~~~(“Statement No. 167”, codified within ASC Topic 810,~~~~Consolidation~~).

~~Statement No. 166 amended the accounting for transfers of financial assets. Under Statement No. 166, the trusts used~~included in the Company’s Direct Banking segment. The Company acquired SLC’s ongoing private student loan business, which includes certain private student loans held in three securitization ~~transactions~~trusts and other assets, and assumed SLC’s asset-backed securitization debt incurred by those trusts and other liabilities. The acquired loans are ~~no longer exempt from consolidation. Statement No. 167 prescribes an ongoing assessment~~considered to be purchased credit-impaired loans for accounting purposes, the details of which are discussed further in Note 4: Loan Receivables. The acquisition significantly increased the size of the Company’s ~~involvement in~~private student loan portfolio. In addition, the ~~activities~~acquisition has provided the Company with a developed student loan business platform, additional school relationships and SLC’s website. Since the acquisition date, the results of ~~the trusts~~operations and ~~the Company’s rights or obligations to receive benefits or absorb losses~~cash flows of ~~the trusts that could be potentially significant in order to determine whether those variable interest entities (“VIEs”) will be required to be consolidated~~SLC have been included in the Company’s ~~financial statements. In accordance with Statement No. 167,~~condensed consolidated results of operations and cash flows. Pro forma data is not provided as the impact of the SLC acquisition was not significant to the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations or cash flows.

Net cash consideration paid. The following table provides a calculation of the amount paid by the Company ~~concluded it is~~for the ~~primary beneficiary~~net assets of the ~~Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”) (the “trusts”) and accordingly, the Company began consolidating the~~SLC securitization trusts ~~on December 1, 2009. Using the carrying amounts of~~acquired after applying an 8.5% discount to the trust assets ~~and liabilities as prescribed by Statement No. 167,~~(the “Trust Certificate Purchase Price”) (dollars in millions):


	Actual February 28, 2011			Estimate at Closing December 31, 2010
Gross trust assets	$	3,977		$	3,993
Less: 8.5% discount		(338	)		(339	)

Net trust assets		3,639			3,654
Less: Principal amount of and accrued interest on trust debt		(3,193	)		(3,215	)

Trust Certificate Purchase Price	$	446		$	439

Although the Company ~~recorded~~paid SLC shareholders $600 million for the acquisition of SLC (“Aggregate Merger Consideration”), the Company received a ~~$21.1 billion increase in~~purchase price adjustment from Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) equivalent to the amount by which the Aggregate Merger Consideration exceeded the value of the Trust Certificate Purchase Price. In addition, Citibank agreed to adjust the cash consideration paid by the Company to compensate it for (i) agreeing to commute certain insurance policies covering certain of the loans acquired and (ii) for the value of non-trust related liabilities assumed by the Company. The following table provides a summary of total ~~assets, a $22.4 billion increase in total liabilities~~consideration paid by Discover at the closing of the acquisition on December 31, 2010 and a ~~$1.3 billion decrease~~summary of the consideration revised for post-closing adjustments (dollars in ~~stockholders’ equity (comprised~~millions):


	Actual February 28, 2011			Estimate at Closing December 31, 2010
Aggregate Merger Consideration	$	600		$	600
Less: Purchase price adjustment⁽¹⁾		(154	)		(161	)

Trust Certificate Purchase Price		446			439
Less: Further adjustments provided for by Citibank
Cash received for consent to insurance commutation		(16	)		(16	)
Cash received related to reimbursable liabilities⁽¹⁾		(29	)		(57	)

Net cash consideration paid⁽¹⁾	$	401		$	366

(1)

Based on the actual audited SLC closing balance sheet, the Company accrued a $35 million liability payable to Citibank for post-closing adjustments arising from a $7 million increase in the Trust Certificate Purchase Price and a $28 million reduction in reimbursable liabilities, which together resulted in the difference between the actual and estimated numbers shown.

Net assets acquired. The Company acquired net assets (including $155 million of cash) with an aggregate fair value of $572 million in exchange for cash consideration of $556 million, resulting in the recognition of a ~~$1.4 billion decrease in retained earnings offset by a $0.1 billion increase in accumulated other comprehensive income). These amounts were comprised~~bargain purchase gain of approximately $16 million. The bargain purchase gain primarily resulted from Citibank’s adjustment of the ~~following transition adjustments, which were treated as noncash activities~~cash consideration to be paid by the Company in exchange for ~~purposes~~the Company’s consent to permit SLC to commute, immediately prior to the acquisition, certain student loan insurance policies covering loans in one of ~~preparing~~ the three trusts. The bargain purchase gain is recorded in other income on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of ~~cash flows:~~income.

The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the SLC acquisition. Adjustments to these amounts may occur during the remainder of 2011 as the Company completes its final valuation analysis of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (dollars in thousands):


	At December 31, 2010
Student loan receivables	$	3,050,784
Cash		155,347
Indemnification asset		101,127
Student relationships intangible		2,400
Trade name intangible		3,800

Total intangible assets		6,200
Other assets		218,514

Total assets acquired		3,531,972
Securitized debt		2,921,372
Other liabilities		38,178

Total liabilities assumed		2,959,550

Net assets acquired	$	572,422

~~Consolidation~~The Company acquired $6.2 million in identifiable intangible assets. These intangible assets consist of ~~$22.3 billion~~student relationships and trade name intangibles. Acquired student relationships consist of ~~securitized loan receivables~~those relationships in existence between SLC and the numerous students that carry student loan balances. This intangible asset is deemed to have a finite useful life of five years and will be amortized over this period. Trade name intangibles relate to trademarks, trade names and internet domains and content. This intangible asset is deemed to have an indefinite useful life and is therefore not subject to amortization.

The Company also recorded a $101 million indemnification asset. This asset reflects the discounted present value of payments expected to be received under Citibank’s indemnification of student loan credit losses that would have been recoverable under certain student loan insurance policies which, as noted above, were commuted pursuant to an agreement entered into by SLC with the Company’s consent immediately prior to the acquisition. The indemnification pertains only to loans in one of the three trusts. The initial value of the indemnification asset is based on the insured portion of expected credit losses reflected in the initial carrying value of the related ~~debt issued from~~loans. Indemnification payments related to student loan credit losses are subject to an overall cap of $166.8 million, consistent with the ~~trusts~~terms of the insurance policies which the indemnification serves to ~~third-party investors;~~

~~Consolidation of $0.1 billion of cash collateral accounts and~~replace. As changes occur in the ~~associated debt issued from~~expected losses on the ~~trusts;~~

~~Reclassification of $2.3 billion of held-to-maturity investment securities to loan receivables;~~

Reclassification of $2.3 billion of available-for-sale investment securities to loan receivables and reversal of $0.1 billion, net of tax, of related unrealized losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income;

•
~~Recording of a $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses, not previously required under GAAP~~,~~for the newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables;~~

~~Reversal of all amounts recorded in amounts due from asset securitization through (i) derecognition~~trust loans, the value of the remaining $0.1 billion value of the interest-only strip receivable, net of tax, (ii) reclassification of $0.8 billion of cash collateral accounts and $0.3 billion of accumulated collections to restricted cash, (iii) reclassification of $0.2 billion to unbilled accrued interest receivable, and (iv) reclassification of $0.3 billion of billed accrued interest receivable to loan receivables; and

~~Recording of net deferred tax assets of $0.8 billion, largely related to establishing an allowance for loan losses on the newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables.~~

~~The assets of the consolidated VIEs include restricted cash and certain credit card loan receivables, which are restricted to settle the obligations of those entities and are not expected to~~indemnification asset will be available to the Company or its creditors. Liabilities of the consolidated VIEs include secured borrowings for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company.

The Company’s statements of income for the three months and nine months ended August 31, 2010 no longer reflect securitization income, but instead report interest income, net charge-offs and certain other income associated with all securitized loan receivables, and interest expense associated with debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors, in the same line items in the Company’s statement of income as non-securitized credit card loan receivables and corporate debt. Additionally, the Company no longer records initial gains on new securitization activity since securitized credit card loans no longer receive sale accounting treatment. Also, there are no gains or losses recorded on the revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable as that asset is not recognizable in a transaction accounted for as a secured borrowing. Because the Company’s securitization transactions are accounted for under the new accounting rules as secured borrowings rather than asset sales, the cash flows from these transactions are presented as cash flows from financing activities rather than as cash flows from operating or investing activities.

~~The Company’s statement of income for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 and its statement of financial condition as of November 30, 2009 have not been retrospectively~~ adjusted to reflect Statements No. 166 and 167. Therefore, current period results and balances will not be comparable to prior period amounts, particularly with regard to the following (and their related subtotals):accordingly.

~~Investment securities;~~

~~Loan receivables (and the related delinquencies, charge-offs, and allowance and provision for loan losses);~~

~~Certain securitization assets recorded under prior GAAP;~~

~~Long-term borrowings;~~

~~Interest income;~~

~~Interest expense;~~

~~Other income; and~~

~~Earnings per share.~~

3. Investment Securities

The Company’s investment securities consist of the following (dollars in thousands):


	August 31, 2010		November 30, 2009		February 28, 2011		November 30, 2010
U.S. Treasury securities	$	1,552	$	—	$	1,807,964	$	1,575,403
U.S. government agency securities		1,004		—		2,120,627		1,888,701
States and political subdivisions of states		51,759		68,553		43,616		51,774
Other securities:
Certificated retained interests in DCENT and DCMT⁽¹⁾		—		4,501,108
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers		1,149,666		381,705		743,475		1,031,112
Asset-backed commercial paper notes		—		58,792
Corporate debt securities⁽¹⁾						505,600		507,896
Residential mortgage-backed securities		10,630		12,929		9,002		9,800
Other debt and equity securities		11,136		12,210		10,597		10,709

Total other securities		1,171,432		4,966,744		1,268,674		1,559,517

Total investment securities	$	1,225,747	$	5,035,297	$	5,240,881	$	5,075,395

(1)

~~Upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009,~~Amount represents corporate debt obligations issued under the ~~amount outstanding at November 30, 2009 was reclassified to loan receivables. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.~~Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) that are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
At August 31, 2010
At February 28, 2011
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities⁽¹⁾
U.S Treasury securities										$	1,823,524	$	183	$	(16,293	)	$	1,807,414
U.S government agency securities											2,128,854		15		(8,242	)		2,120,627
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers	$	1,132,877	$	16,807	$	(18	)	$	1,149,666		731,042		12,434		(1	)		743,475
Equity securities		15		2		—			17
U.S. government agency securities		1,004		—		—			1,004
U.S. Treasury securities		1,002		—		—			1,002
Corporate debt securities											505,410		268		(78	)		505,600

Total available-for-sale investment securities	$	1,134,898	$	16,809	$	(18	)	$	1,151,689	$	5,188,830	$	12,900	$	(24,614	)	$	5,177,116

Held-to-Maturity Investment Securities⁽²⁾
U.S. Treasury securities⁽³⁾	$	550	$	—	$	—		$	550	$	550	$	0	$	0		$	550
States and political subdivisions of states		51,759		441		(2,375	)		49,825		43,616		130		(4,676	)		39,070
Residential mortgage-backed securities		10,630		905		—			11,535		9,002		772		0			9,774
Other debt securities⁽⁴⁾		11,119		—		—			11,119		10,597		0		0			10,597

Total held-to-maturity investment securities	$	74,058	$	1,346	$	(2,375	)	$	73,029	$	63,765	$	902	$	(4,676	)	$	59,991

At November 30, 2009
At November 30, 2010
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities⁽¹⁾
Certificated retained interests in DCENT	$	2,330,000	$	978	$	(126,009	)	$	2,204,969
U.S Treasury securities										$	1,576,094	$	344	$	(1,585	)	$	1,574,853
U.S government agency securities											1,888,909		1,090		(1,298	)		1,888,701
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers		362,377		19,362		(34	)		381,705		1,017,183		13,983		(54	)		1,031,112
Asset-backed commercial paper notes		51,337		7,455		—			58,792
Corporate debt securities											507,757		241		(102	)		507,896
Equity securities		15		—		—			15		15		2		0			17

Total available-for-sale investment securities	$	2,743,729	$	27,795	$	(126,043	)	$	2,645,481	$	4,989,958	$	15,660	$	(3,039	)	$	5,002,579

Held-to-Maturity Investment Securities⁽²⁾
Certificated retained interests in DCENT and DCMT	$	2,296,139	$	—	$	(430,655	)	$	1,865,484
U.S. Treasury securities⁽³⁾										$	550	$	0	$	0		$	550
States and political subdivisions of states		68,553		19		(6,162	)		62,410		51,774		281		(3,771	)		48,284
Residential mortgage-backed securities		12,929		972		—			13,901		9,800		869		0			10,669
Other debt securities⁽⁴⁾		12,195		—		—			12,195
Other debt securities⁽⁴⁾											10,692		0		0			10,692

Total held-to-maturity investment securities	$	2,389,816	$	991	$	(436,817	)	$	1,953,990	$	72,816	$	1,150	$	(3,771	)	$	70,195

(1)	Available-for-sale investment securities are reported at fair value.

(2)	Held-to-maturity investment securities are reported at amortized cost.

(3)	Amount represents ~~U.S. Treasury~~ securities pledged as collateral to a government-related merchant for which transaction settlement occurs beyond the normal 24-hour period.

(4)	Included in other debt securities at ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009~~2010 are commercial advances of ~~$8.3~~$7.9 million ~~and $9.4 million, respectively,~~for both periods related to the Company’s Community Reinvestment Act strategies.

At August 31, 2010, the Company had 13 investments in credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers and 3 investments in state and political subdivisions of states in an unrealized loss position. The following table provides information about investment securities with aggregate gross unrealized losses and the length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009~~2010 (dollars in thousands):


	Less than 12 months					More than 12 months					Number of Securities in a Loss Position		Less than 12 months				More than 12 months
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Number of Securities in a Loss Position		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
At August 31, 2010
At February 28, 2011
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities
U.S. Treasury securities												19	$	1,364,442	$	16,293	$	0	$	0
U.S. government agency securities												32		1,969,674		8,242	$	0	$	0
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers	$	117,404	$	(18	)	$	—	$	—			5		40,931		1	$	0	$	0
Corporate debt securities												2		76,946		78	$	0	$	0
Held-to-Maturity Investment Securities
State and political subdivisions of states	$	—	$	—		$	28,760	$	(2,375	)		5	$	9,016	$	190	$	22,084	$	4,486
At November 30, 2009
At November 30, 2010
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities
Certificated retained interests in DCENT	$	1,149,143	$	(115,857	)	$	889,848	$	(10,152	)
U.S. Treasury securities												17	$	1,262,670	$	1,585	$	0	$	0
U.S. government agency securities												18	$	1,181,148	$	1,298	$	0	$	0
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers	$	127,509	$	(34	)	$	—	$	—			23	$	238,646	$	54	$	0	$	0
Corporate debt securities												5	$	230,441	$	102	$	0	$	0
Held-to-Maturity Investment Securities
Certificated retained interests in DCENT and DCMT	$	1,865,484	$	(430,655	)	$	—	$	—
State and political subdivisions of states	$	—	$	—		$	51,778	$	(6,162	)		4	$	7,731	$	239	$	27,603	$	3,532

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ the Company received ~~$560.3~~$342 million and ~~$209.6~~$72.6 million, respectively, of proceeds related to maturities ~~redemptions~~ or ~~liquidation~~redemptions of investment securities. In 2011, approximately $333 million of these proceeds related to maturities of credit card asset-backed securities ~~respectively. During the same periods, the Company had no sales~~ of ~~investment securities.~~other issuers.

The Company records gains and losses on investment securities in other income when investments are sold or liquidated, when the Company believes an investment is other than temporarily impaired prior to the disposal of the investment, or in certain other circumstances. ~~During~~In the ~~three and nine months ended August 31, 2010,~~first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded ~~losses of $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, on other debt securities and~~ a ~~$19.6 million pretax~~$141 thousand gain ~~related~~relating primarily to the ~~liquidation~~sale of ~~collateral supporting the asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC, which had invested in mortgage-backed~~equity securities. The investment was originally purchased in 2007 for $120.1 million, subsequently written down to $51.3 million and, in August 2010, liquidated for $70.9 million. During the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009, the Company realized $7.4 million and $9.2 million of other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”), which was recorded entirely in earnings, the majority of which was related to Golden Key. As of August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, no OTTI had been recorded in other comprehensive income.

The Company records unrealized gains and losses on its available-for-sale investment securities in other comprehensive income. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ the Company recorded net unrealized losses of ~~$2.5~~$24.3 million ($~~1.6~~15.2 million after tax) and ~~$66.1~~net unrealized gains of $3.4 million ($~~41.6~~2.2 million after tax), respectively, in other comprehensive income. For the nine months ended August 31, 2010, the Company reversed an unrealized gain of $7.5 million ($4.7 million after tax) from other comprehensive income upon liquidation of the collateral supporting the Golden Key investment. Additionally, the Company eliminated a net unrealized loss of $125.0 million ($78.6 million after tax) upon consolidation of its securitization trusts in connection with the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009.

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had ~~$2.4~~$4.5 million of gross unrealized losses in a continuous loss position for more than 12 months on its held-to-maturity investment securities in states and political subdivisions of states, compared to ~~$6.2~~$3.5 million of gross unrealized losses at November 30, ~~2009.~~2010. The Company believes the unrealized loss on these investments is the result of changes in interest rates subsequent to the Company’s acquisitions of these securities and that the reduction in value is temporary. The Company does not intend to sell these investments nor does it expect to be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, but rather expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of these securities.

Maturities of available-for-sale debt securities and held-to-maturity debt securities at ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 are provided in the table below (dollars in thousands):


	One Year or Less		After One Year Through Five Years		After Five Years Through Ten Years		After Ten Years		Total		One Year or Less		After One Year Through Five Years		After Five Years Through Ten Years		After Ten Years		Total
Available-for-sale—Amortized Cost⁽¹⁾
U.S Treasury securities											$	402,064	$	1,421,460	$	0	$	0	$	1,823,524
U.S government agency securities												430,657		1,698,197		0		0		2,128,854
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers	$	833,951	$	298,926	$	—	$	—	$	1,132,877		456,594		274,448		0		0		731,042
U.S. government agency securities		1,004		—		—		—		1,004
U.S. Treasury securities		1,002		—		—		—		1,002
Corporate debt securities												153,064		352,346		0		0		505,410

Total available-for-sale investment securities	$	835,957	$	298,926	$	—	$	—	$	1,134,883	$	1,442,379	$	3,746,451	$	0	$	0	$	5,188,830

Held-to-maturity—Amortized Cost⁽²⁾
U.S. Treasury securities	$	550	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	550	$	550	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	550
State and political subdivisions of states		—		2,905		5,630		43,224		51,759		0		2,535		4,175		36,906		43,616
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		—		—		10,630		10,630		0		0		0		9,002		9,002
Other debt securities		964		4,211		2,140		3,804		11,119		619		4,210		1,991		3,777		10,597

Total held-to-maturity investment securities	$	1,514	$	7,116	$	7,770	$	57,658	$	74,058	$	1,169	$	6,745	$	6,166	$	49,685	$	63,765

Available-for-sale—Fair Values⁽¹⁾
U.S Treasury securities											$	402,223	$	1,405,191	$	0	$	0	$	1,807,414
U.S government agency securities												430,608		1,690,019		0		0		2,120,627
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers	$	837,293	$	312,373	$	—	$	—	$	1,149,666		458,445		285,030		0		0		743,475
U.S. government agency securities		1,004		—		—		—		1,004
U.S. Treasury securities		1,002		—		—		—		1,002
Corporate debt securities												153,145		352,455		0		0		505,600

Total available-for-sale investment securities	$	839,299	$	312,373	$	—	$	—	$	1,151,672	$	1,444,421	$	3,732,695	$	0	$	0	$	5,177,116

Held-to-maturity—Fair Values⁽²⁾
U.S. Treasury securities	$	550	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	550	$	550	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	550
State and political subdivisions of states		—		3,005		5,835		40,985		49,825		0		2,549		4,291		32,230		39,070
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		—		—		11,535		11,535		0		0		0		9,774		9,774
Other debt securities		964		4,211		2,140		3,804		11,119		619		4,210		1,991		3,777		10,597

Total held-to-maturity investment securities	$	1,514	$	7,216	$	7,975	$	56,324	$	73,029	$	1,169	$	6,759	$	6,282	$	45,781	$	59,991

(1)	Available-for-sale investment securities are reported at fair value.

(2)	Held-to-maturity investment securities are reported at amortized cost.

4. Loan Receivables

~~Loan~~The Company has three portfolio segments: credit card loans, other consumer loans and purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) student loans acquired in the SLC transaction (See Note 2: Business Combinations). Within these portfolio segments, the Company has classes of receivables ~~consist of~~which are depicted in the ~~following~~table below (dollars in thousands):


	August 31, 2010			November 30, 2009			February 28, 2011			November 30, 2010
Student loans held for sale	$	1,437,592		$	—
Loans held for sale⁽¹⁾							$	766,661		$	788,101
Loan portfolio:
Credit card loans:
Discover card^{(1) (2)}		44,930,267			19,826,153
Discover Card⁽²⁾								44,081,251			44,904,267
Discover business card		317,899			404,149			235,996			252,727

Total credit card loans		45,248,166			20,230,302			44,317,247			45,156,994
Other consumer loans:
Personal loans		1,706,873			1,394,379			2,019,749			1,877,633
Federal student loans⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		809,055			1,352,587
Private student loans⁽⁴⁾		880,854			579,679
Private student loans								1,534,104			999,322
Other		48,124			68,137			14,083			14,363

Total other consumer loans		3,444,906			3,394,782			3,567,936			2,891,318
PCI student loans⁽³⁾								3,011,384			0

Total loan portfolio		48,693,072			23,625,084			50,896,567			48,048,312

Total loan receivables		50,130,664			23,625,084			51,663,228			48,836,413
Allowance for loan losses⁽²⁾		(3,743,721	)		(1,757,899	)		(3,033,459	)		(3,304,118	)

Net loan receivables	$	46,386,943		$	21,867,185		$	48,629,769		$	45,532,295

(1)

~~Amounts include $19.4 billion underlying investors’ interests in trust debt at August 31, 2010, and $15.4 billion and $9.9 billion in seller’s interest at August 31, 2010~~Amount represents federal student loans. At February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009, respectively. See Note 5: Credit Card Securitization Activities for more information.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Upon adoption~~2010, $491.0 million and $500.2 million of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009, the Company consolidated $22.3 billion of securitized loan receivables, reclassified $4.6 billion from investment securities to loan receivables and recorded a $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.

~~(3)~~

~~Amount at August 31, 2010 includes $490.2 million of~~federal student loan receivables, ~~which, along with accrued interest of $27.3 million, are~~respectively, were pledged as collateral against a long-term borrowing.

~~(4)~~(2)

~~Federal student~~Amounts include $18.3 billion and $19.5 billion of underlying investors’ interest in trust debt at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively, and $15.1 billion and $14.9 billion in seller’s interest at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively. See Note 5: Credit Card and Student Loan Securitization Activities for further information.

(3)

Amount includes $3,007 million of loans ~~are guaranteed by~~pledged as collateral against the ~~U.S. Department of Education. Private student~~notes issued from the SLC securitization trusts. See Note 5: Credit Card and Student Loan Securitization Activities. The remaining $4.6 million not pledged as collateral represents loans ~~are made directly to~~eligible for reimbursement through an indemnification claim. SLC must purchase such loans from the ~~student with no government guarantees.~~trust before a claim may be filed.

~~Student~~Credit Quality Indicators.The Company regularly reviews its collection experience (including delinquencies and net charge-offs) in determining its allowance for loan losses. Credit card and closed-end consumer loan receivables are placed on nonaccrual status upon receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death of a customer or suspected fraudulent activity on an account. In some cases of suspected fraudulent activity, loan receivables may resume accruing interest upon completion of the fraud investigation.

Information related to the delinquencies and net charge-offs in the Company’s loan portfolio, which excludes loans held for sale, ~~which are carried at the lower~~is shown below by each class of ~~cost or market, represent certain federal~~loan receivables except for PCI student loans, ~~eligible for sale at August 31, 2010 to~~which is shown later under the ~~U.S. Department of Education. See Note 18: Subsequent Events.~~

~~The following table provides changes in the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010 and 2009~~heading “Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans” (dollars in thousands):

   For the Three Months Ended
August 31, For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
   2010 2009 2010 2009
Balance at beginning of period
   $ 3,930,624    $ 1,986,473    $ 1,757,899    $ 1,374,585
Addition to allowance related to securitized receivables⁽¹⁾
   —      —      2,144,461    —
Additions:

Provision for loan losses
   712,565    380,999    2,824,035    1,962,673
Deductions:

Charge-offs:

Discover card
   (982,920 ) (541,272 ) (3,203,959 ) (1,560,820 )
Discover business card
   (14,502 ) (18,400 ) (50,190 ) (43,671 )

Total credit card loans
   (997,422 ) (559,672 ) (3,254,149 ) (1,604,491 )
Personal loans
   (23,836 ) (20,920 ) (70,957 ) (46,186 )
Federal student loans
   (11 ) —      (308 ) —
Private student loans
   (660 ) (259 ) (1,264 ) (355 )
Other
   (139 ) —      (858 ) (18 )

Total other consumer loans
   (24,646 ) (21,179 ) (73,387 ) (46,559 )

Total charge-offs
   (1,022,068 ) (580,851 ) (3,327,536 ) (1,651,050 )
Recoveries:

Discover card
   121,255    45,214    341,337    144,901
Discover business card
   875    272    2,516    602

Total credit card loans
   122,130    45,486    343,853    145,503
Personal loans
   421    231    942    615
Federal student loans
   —      —      —      —
Private student loans
   14 —      22    —
Other
   35    22    45    34

Total other consumer loans
   470    253    1,009    649

Total recoveries
   122,600    45,739    344,862    146,152

Net charge-offs
   (899,468 ) (535,112 ) (2,982,674 ) (1,504,898 )

Balance at end of period
   $ 3,743,721    $ 1,832,360    $ 3,743,721    $ 1,832,360


Delinquent and Non-Accruing Loans:
	30-89 Days Delinquent		90 or More Days Delinquent		Total Past Due		90 or More Days Delinquent and Accruing		Total Non-accruing
At February 28, 2011
Credit card loans:
Discover card⁽¹⁾	$	703,504	$	875,406	$	1,578,910	$	764,968	$	250,827
Discover business card		3,997		6,984		10,981		6,423		1,107

Total credit card loans		707,501		882,390		1,589,891		771,391		251,934
Other consumer loans:
Personal loans		15,661		8,643		24,304		7,880		2,633
Private student loans (excluding PCI)		9,384		1,697		11,081		1,697		95
Other		199		3,472		3,671		0		3,556

Total other consumer loans (excluding PCI)		25,244		13,812		39,056		9,577		6,284

Total loan receivables (excluding PCI)	$	732,745	$	896,202	$	1,628,947	$	780,968	$	258,218

At November 30, 2010
Total loan receivables⁽¹⁾	$	908,306	$	993,618	$	1,901,924	$	853,757	$	325,900

(1)

~~Upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009, the Company recorded a $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses related to newly consolidated and reclassified~~Consumer credit card ~~loan receivables. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle~~loans that are 90 or more days delinquent and accruing interest include $77.0 million and $35.0 million of loans accounted for ~~more information.~~as troubled debt restructurings at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively.


Net Charge-Offs:
	Net Charge-offs		Net Charge-off Rate
For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2011
Credit card loans:
Discover card	$	661,243		5.93	%
Discover business card		6,533		10.38	%

Total credit card loans		667,776		5.96	%
Other consumer loans:
Personal loans		19,634		4.10	%
Private student loans (excluding PCI)		924		0.29	%
Other		34		0.97	%

Total other consumer loans (excluding PCI)		20,592		1.38	%

Net charge-offs as a percentage of total loans (excluding PCI)	$	688,368		5.64	%

Net charge-offs as a percentage of total loans (including PCI)	$	688,368		5.42	%

~~Net charge-offs~~Additionally, the Company reviews information related to the performance of ~~principal~~the customer’s account with the Company as well as information from credit bureaus, such as a FICO score, relating to the customer’s broader credit performance. FICO scores are ~~recorded against~~generally obtained at origination of the ~~provisions~~account and monthly or quarterly thereafter. The following table provides the most recent FICO scores available for the Company’s customers as of February 28, 2011, as a percentage of each class of loan receivables:


	Credit Risk Profile by FICO Score
	660 and Above			Less than 660 or No Score
Discover card		76	%		24	%
Discover business card		84	%		16	%
Private student loans (excluding PCI)		93	%		7	%
Personal loans		89	%		11	%

Allowance for Loan Losses. The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses ~~as shown~~at a level that is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the ~~table above. Information regarding net charge-offs~~loan portfolio. The Company considers the collectibility of all amounts contractually due on its loan receivables, including those components representing interest and fees. Accordingly, the allowance for loan losses represents the estimated uncollectible principal, interest and fee components of loan receivables. The allowance is evaluated monthly for adequacy and is maintained through an adjustment to the provision for loan losses. Charge-offs of principal amounts of loans outstanding are deducted from the allowance and subsequent recoveries of such amounts increase the allowance. Charge-offs of loan balances representing unpaid interest and fees result in a reversal of interest and fee ~~revenues on credit card loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):~~

   For the Three Months Ended
August 31,    For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
        2010⁽¹⁾            2009             2010⁽¹⁾            2009
Interest accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries (recorded as a reduction to interest income)
   $ 219,422    $ 114,828    $ 723,909    $ 363,769
Fees accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries (recorded as a reduction to other income)
   $ 58,331    $ 43,730    $ 228,039    $ 134,578

~~(1)~~

The amounts at August 31, 2010 include securitized loans as a result of the consolidation of the securitization trusts upon adoption of Statement No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.

The Company calculates its allowance for loan losses by estimating probable losses separately for segments of the loan portfolio with similar risk characteristics, which generally results in segmenting the portfolio by loan product type.income, respectively.

For its credit card loan receivables, the Company bases its allowance for loan losses on several analyses that help estimate incurred losses as of the balance sheet date. While the Company’s estimation process includes historical data and analysis, there is a significant amount of judgment applied in selecting inputs and analyzing the results produced by the models to determine the allowance. The Company uses a migration analysis to estimate the likelihood that a loan ~~receivable~~ will progress through the various stages of delinquency and eventually charge off. In the first quarter 2010, the Company developed analytics which provide a better understanding of the likelihood that current accounts, or those that are not delinquent, will eventually charge off.delinquency. The ~~Company~~loan balances used ~~this information~~ in ~~combination with~~ the migration analysis represent all amounts contractually due and, as a result, the migration analysis captures principal, interest and fee components in estimating uncollectible accounts. The Company uses other analyses to ~~determine its allowance for credit card~~estimate losses incurred on non-delinquent accounts. The considerations in these analyses include past performance, risk management techniques applied to various accounts, historical behavior of different account vintages, current economic conditions, recent trends in delinquencies, bankruptcy filings, account collection management, policy changes, account seasoning, loan ~~losses at August 31, 2010.~~volume and amounts, payment rates, and forecasting uncertainties. The Company does not identify individual loans for impairment, but instead estimates its allowance for credit card loan losses on a pooled basis, which includes loans that are delinquent and/or no longer accruing interest.

Loan receivables that have been modified under troubled debt restructurings are evaluated separately from the pool of receivables that is subject to the above analysis. Credit card loan receivables modified in a troubled debt restructuring are recorded at their present values with impairment measured as the difference between the loan balance and the discounted present value of cash flows expected to be collected. Changes in the present value are recorded to the provision for loan losses.

For its other consumer loans, the Company considers historical and forecasted ~~estimate~~estimates of incurred losses in estimating the related allowance for loan losses. ~~In determining the proper level of the allowance for loan losses related to both credit card and other consumer loans, the~~The Company may also consider other factors, such as current economic conditions, recent trends in delinquencies and bankruptcy filings, account collection management, policy changes, account seasoning, loan volume and amounts, payment rates and forecasting uncertainties.

The following table provides changes in the Company’s allowance for loan losses for the three months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,304,118		$	1,757,899
Additions:
Addition to allowance related to securitized receivables⁽¹⁾		0			2,144,461
Provision for loan losses		417,709			1,387,206
Deductions:
Charge-offs:
Discover card		(792,632	)		(1,140,485	)
Discover business card		(7,386	)		(19,286	)

Total credit card loans		(800,018	)		(1,159,771	)
Personal loans		(20,050	)		(24,080	)
Federal student loans		0			(49	)
Private student loans		(939	)		(344	)
Other		(35	)		(8	)

Total other consumer loans		(21,024	)		(24,481	)

Total charge-offs		(821,042	)		(1,184,252	)
Recoveries:
Discover card		131,389			101,121
Discover business card		853			730

Total credit card loans		132,242			101,851
Personal loans		416			191
Private student loans		15			2
Other		1			2

Total other consumer loans		432			195

Total recoveries		132,674			102,046

Net charge-offs		(688,368	)		(1,082,206	)

Balance at end of period	$	3,033,459		$	4,207,360

(1)	On December 1, 2009, upon adoption of FASB Statements No. 166 and 167, the Company recorded $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses related to newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables.

Net charge-offs of principal are recorded against the allowance for loan losses, as shown in the table above. Information regarding ~~nonaccrual, past due~~net charge-offs of interest and ~~restructured loan receivables~~fee revenues on credit card and other consumer loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   August 31,
2010⁽¹⁾    November 30,
2009
Loans not accruing interest
   $ 374,836    $ 190,086
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest
   $ 928,521    $ 522,190
Restructured loans⁽²⁾
   $ 284,561    $ 72,924


	For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2011		2010
Interest and fees accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries (recorded as a reduction of interest income)⁽¹⁾	$	188,221	$	267,707
Fees accrued subsequently charged off, net of recoveries (recorded as a reduction to other income)⁽¹⁾	$	35,370	$	92,088

(1)	Beginning in 2011, net charge-offs of interest and fees include amounts related to other consumer loans. Prior to 2011 such amounts were not material.

The following table provides additional detail of the Company’s allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in its loan portfolio (which excludes loans held for sale) by impairment methodology (dollars in thousands):


	Credit Card		Personal Loans		Student Loans		Other Loans		Total
At February 28, 2011
Allowance for loans evaluated for impairment as:
Collectively impaired⁽¹⁾	$	2,733,992	$	74,379	$	19,153	$	1,081	$	2,828,605
Troubled debt restructurings⁽²⁾		204,854		0		0		0		204,854
Purchased credit-impaired⁽³⁾		0		0		0		0		0

Total allowance for loan losses	$	2,938,846	$	74,379	$	19,153	$	1,081	$	3,033,459

Recorded investment in loans evaluated for impairment as:
Collectively impaired⁽¹⁾	$	43,047,675	$	2,019,749	$	1,534,104	$	14,083	$	46,615,611
Troubled debt restructurings⁽²⁾		1,269,572		0		0		0		1,269,572
Purchased credit-impaired⁽³⁾		0		0		3,011,384		0		3,011,384

Total recorded investment	$	44,317,247	$	2,019,749	$	4,545,488	$	14,083	$	50,896,567

At November 30, 2010
Allowance for loans evaluated for impairment as:
Collectively impaired⁽¹⁾	$	3,095,046	$	76,087	$	18,569	$	574	$	3,190,276
Troubled debt restructurings⁽²⁾		113,842		0		0		0		113,842
Purchased credit-impaired⁽³⁾		0		0		0		0		0

Total allowance for loan losses	$	3,208,888	$	76,087	$	18,569	$	574	$	3,304,118

Recorded investment in loans evaluated for impairment as:
Collectively impaired⁽¹⁾	$	44,851,650	$	1,877,633	$	999,322	$	14,363	$	47,742,968
Troubled debt restructurings⁽²⁾		305,344		0		0		0		305,344
Purchased credit-impaired⁽³⁾		0		0		0		0		0

Total recorded investment	$	45,156,994	$	1,877,633	$	999,322	$	14,363	$	48,048,312

(1)	Represents loans evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 450-20,Loss Contingencies.

(2)

Represents loans evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10,Receivables,which consists of modified loans accounted for as troubled debt restructurings. The ~~amounts~~unpaid principal balance of such loans was $1.1 billion at ~~August 31, 2010 include securitized~~February 28, 2011. In the first quarter 2011, the Company began accounting for credit card loans modified through temporary hardship and external programs as troubled debt restructurings. The impact on the allowance for loan losses as a result of ~~the consolidation of the securitization trusts upon adoption of Statement No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle~~this change was not material. All loans accounted for ~~more information.~~as troubled debt restructurings have a related allowance for loan losses.

~~(2)~~(3)

~~Restructured~~Represents loans ~~include $37.3 million~~evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 310-30,Receivables-Loans and ~~$9.7 million for the periods ended August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively, that are also included in loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest.~~Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.

~~As part~~Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings.The Company has loan modification programs that provide for temporary or permanent hardship relief for credit card loans to borrowers experiencing financial hardship. The temporary hardship program primarily consists of ~~certain collection strategies, the Company may place~~ a ~~customer’s account in~~reduced minimum payment and an interest rate reduction, both lasting for a period no longer than twelve months. The permanent workout program ~~under which~~involves changing the structure of the loan to a fixed payment loan with a maturity no longer than 60 months and reducing the interest rate on the loan. These programs do not normally provide for the forgiveness of unpaid principal, but may allow for the reversal of certain unpaid interest or fee assessments.

The Company also makes loan modifications for customers who request financial assistance through external sources, such as a consumer credit counseling agency (“CCCA”) program (referred to below as external programs). These loans typically receive a reduced interest rate but continue to be ~~restructured, at which time~~subject to the ~~customer’s future borrowing privileges are suspended. Therefore, the Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to customers~~original minimum payment terms and do not normally include waiver of unpaid principal, interest or fees.

Credit card loan receivables modified in a ~~permanent workout program. Such modifications~~troubled debt restructuring are ~~accounted for in accordance~~recorded at their present value with ~~ASC 310-40,~~~~Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors~~~~, under which~~impairment measured as the difference between the loan ~~impairment is measured based on~~balance and the discounted present value of cash flows expected to be collected. ~~All of~~Consistent with the Company’s ~~permanent workout~~measurement of impairment of modified loans ~~which are evaluated collectively~~ on ~~an aggregated~~a pooled basis, ~~had a related allowance for loan losses.~~

~~At August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009,~~ the Company ~~had included $104.6 million and $28.0 million, respectively, in~~uses as its ~~allowance for loan losses for~~discount rate the average current annual percentage rate it applies to non-impaired credit card loans, ~~in its permanent workout program.~~ similar to what would have applied to the pool of modified loans prior to impairment.

Interest income ~~on these~~from loans accounted for as troubled debt restructurings is accounted for in the same manner as other accruing loans. Cash collections on these loans are allocated according to the same payment hierarchy methodology applied to loans that are not in such programs. Additional information about modified loans in the Company’s ~~permanent workout program~~credit card portfolio is shown below (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,				For the Nine Months Ended August 31,
	2010⁽¹⁾		2009		2010⁽¹⁾		2009
For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2011⁽¹⁾									Temporary and Permanent Programs		External Programs
Average recorded investment in loans	$	271,114	$	85,290	$	248,686	$	80,715	$	545,030	$	741,654
Interest income recognized during the time within the period these loans were impaired⁽²⁾	$	765	$	252	$	2,107	$	715	$	6,490	$	15,740
Gross interest income that would have been recorded in accordance with the original terms⁽³⁾	$	10,462	$	2,971	$	28,707	$	7,854	$	15,523	$	2,529

For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2010									Permanent Programs
Average recorded investment in loans									$	226,506
Interest income recognized during the time within the period these loans were impaired⁽²⁾									$	642
Gross interest income that would have been recorded in accordance with the original terms⁽³⁾									$	8,618

(1)

In addition to loans modified through permanent workout programs, in the first quarter 2011, the Company began accounting for credit card loans modified through temporary hardship and external programs as troubled debt restructurings. The ~~amounts at August 31, 2010 include securitized loans~~impact on the allowance for loan losses as a result of ~~the consolidation of the securitization trusts upon adoption of Statement No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.~~this change was not material.

(2)	The Company does not separately track interest income on loans in ~~its permanent workout program.~~modification programs. Amounts shown are estimated by applying an average interest rate to the average loans in the ~~permanent workout program.~~various modification programs.

(3)

The Company does not separately track the amount of gross interest income that would have been recorded if the loans in ~~its permanent workout~~modification programs had not been restructured and interest had instead been recorded in accordance with the original terms. Amounts shown are estimated by applying the difference between the average interest rate earned on non-impaired credit card ~~accounts~~loans and the average interest rate earned on loans in the ~~permanent workout program~~modification programs to the average loans in the ~~permanent workout program.~~modification programs.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans.Purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since origination for which it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected are considered impaired at acquisition and are reported as PCI loans. The private student loans acquired in The Student Loan Corporation transaction comprise the Company’s only PCI loans at February 28, 2011.

PCI loans are subject to interest income recognition on the basis of expected cash flows rather than contractual cash flows, pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30,Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The Company accounts for the entire portfolio of acquired private student loans on the basis of expected cash flows. As the loan portfolio was acquired at a discount related, at least in part, to a decline in the credit quality of the loans since their origination, management has concluded it is probable that it will be unable to collect all contractually required payments due. However, the Company is unable to specifically identify which loans it will be unable to collect.

The PCI student loans were aggregated into pools based on common risk characteristics. Loans were grouped primarily on the basis of origination date as loans originated in a particular year generally reflect the application of common origination strategies and/or underwriting criteria. Because student loan payments are

deferred while the student is in school and all loans in deferment are considered performing, the segmentation between performing and non-performing loans is not considered an accurate risk indicator and was therefore not used as a basis for segmentation. The loan pools match the composition of the securitization trusts in which the acquired loans are held. Each pool is accounted for as a single asset and each has a single composite interest rate, total contractual cash flows and total expected cash flows.

As of the December 31, 2010 acquisition date, the PCI student loans had an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately $3.8 billion, including accrued interest, and a fair value (initial carrying value) of approximately $3.1 billion. Of the $3.8 billion aggregate outstanding balance of loans acquired, loans with an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately $31 million were non-performing as of the acquisition date. PCI student loans had an unpaid principal balance of $3.6 billion and a related carrying amount of $3.0 billion as of February 28, 2011.

At the time of acquisition, these loans were recorded at fair value. The Company estimated the initial fair value of the acquired loans based on the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at a market rate of interest. Expected cash flows used in the initial fair value measurement reflect the effect of expected losses and prepayments as well as anticipated changes in the interest rate indices applicable to these variable rate loans.

Interest income is recognized on each pool of PCI student loans through accretion on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan pool of the difference between the carrying amount of the loan pool and the expected cash flows (accretable yield). The initial estimate of the fair value of the PCI student loans includes the impact of expected credit losses, and therefore, no allowance for loan losses was recorded at the purchase date. The difference between contractually required cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected, as measured at the acquisition date and considering the impact of expected prepayments, is referred to as the non-accretable difference. Charge-offs are absorbed by the non-accretable difference and do not result in a charge to earnings. Consistent prepayment assumptions, which are based on management’s consideration of loan pool characteristics, are applied to both the contractual cash flow and expected cash flow estimates.

The initial estimate of cash flows expected to be collected is updated each reporting period to reflect management’s latest assumptions about expected credit losses and borrower prepayments, and interest rates in effect in the current period. To the extent expected credit losses increase after the date of acquisition, the Company must record an allowance for loan losses through a charge against earnings. There has not been any significant credit deterioration since the acquisition date, and therefore no allowance has been established for the PCI student loans at February 28, 2011. Changes in expected cash flows related to changes in prepayments or interest rate indices for variable rate loans generally are recorded prospectively as adjustments to interest income.

To the extent that a significant increase in cash flows due to lower expected losses is deemed probable, the Company will first reverse any previously established allowance for loan loss and then increase the amount of remaining accretable yield. The increase to yield would be recognized prospectively over the remaining life of the loan pool. An increase in the accretable yield would reduce the remaining non-accretable difference available to absorb subsequent charge-offs.

Certain PCI student loans contained in the pool are covered by an indemnification from Citibank for credit losses. The indemnified loans are presented along with all other PCI student loans and the related indemnification asset is recognized as a separate asset on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. See Note 2: Business Combinations for a description of the indemnification asset.

The following are contractually required payments receivable, cash flows expected to be collected and fair value as of the acquisition date (dollars in millions):


	At December 31, 2010
Contractually required payments receivable⁽¹⁾	$	5,673
Less: Non-accretable difference⁽²⁾		(846	)

Cash flows expected to be collected		4,827
Less: Accretable yield⁽³⁾		(1,776	)

Fair value of loans acquired	$	3,051

(1)	Amount represents principal and interest payments, both currently due and due in the future, adjusted for the effect of estimated prepayments.

(2)	Charge-offs on acquired loans will be written off against non-accretable difference.

(3)	Amount accreted into interest income over the estimated lives of the acquired loans.

The following table provides changes in accretable yield for the acquired loans for the period ended February 28, 2011 (dollars in millions):


	For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	0
Acquisition of The Student Loan Corporation		1,776
Accretion into interest income		(39	)

Balance at end of period	$	1,737

Information related to the credit quality indicators of the PCI student loans in total (which includes loans not yet in repayment) is shown in the table below:


	At February 28, 2011
30 or more days delinquent		2.65	%
90 or more days delinquent		0.85	%
Net charge-off rate		1.06	%

5.	Credit Card and Student Loan Securitization Activities

Credit Card Securitization Activities

The Company accesses the term asset securitization market through ~~DCMT~~the Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and ~~DCENT,~~the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”), which are trusts into which credit card loan receivables are transferred (or, in the case of DCENT, into which beneficial interests in DCMT are transferred) and from which beneficial interests are issued to investors.

The DCMT ~~debt~~ structure consists of Class A, triple-A rated certificates and Class B, single-A rated certificates held by third parties. Credit enhancement is provided by the subordinated Class B certificates, cash collateral accounts, and more subordinated Series 2009-CE certificates that are held by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank. The DCENT debt structure consists of four classes of securities (DiscoverSeries Class A, B, C and D notes), with the most senior class generally receiving a triple-A rating. In this structure, in order to issue senior, higher rated classes of notes, it is necessary to obtain the appropriate amount of credit enhancement, generally through the issuance of junior, lower rated or more highly subordinated classes of notes. The majority of these more highly subordinated classes of notes are held by subsidiaries of Discover Bank. In addition, there is another series of certificates (Series 2009-SD) issued by DCMT which provides increased excess spread levels to

all other outstanding securities of the trusts. The Series 2009-SD certificates are held by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank. In January 2010, the Company increased the size of the Class D (2009-1) note and Series 2009-CE certificate to further support the more senior securities of the trusts. The Company was not contractually required to provide this incremental level of credit enhancement but ~~was permitted to do~~did so pursuant to the trusts’ governing ~~documents.~~

~~Subsequent~~documents in order to ~~November 30, 2009,~~maintain the credit ratings of the securities issued by the trusts and to preserve the Company’s viability as a participant in the credit card asset-backed securitization markets. The credit-related risk of loss associated with trust assets as of the balance sheet date to which the Company is exposed through the retention of these subordinated interests is fully captured in the allowance for loan losses recorded by the Company.

The Company’s credit card securitizations are accounted for as secured borrowings and the trusts are treated as consolidated subsidiaries of the Company under ASC 810 and ASC 860. Accordingly, beginning on December 1, 2009, all of the assets and liabilities of the trusts are included directly on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition. Trust receivables underlying third-party investors’ interests are recorded in credit card loan receivables—restricted for securitization investors, and the related debt issued by the trusts is reported in long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors. Additionally, beginning on December 1, 2009, certain other of theCompany. The Company’s retained interests in the assets of the trusts, principally consisting of investments in DCMT certificates and DCENT notes held by subsidiaries of Discover Bank, ~~now~~ constitute intercompany positions which are eliminated in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. Trust receivables underlying the Company’s various retained interests, including the seller’s interest in trust receivables, are recorded in credit card loan receivables—restricted for securitization investors.

Upon transfer of credit card loan receivables to the trust, the receivables and certain cash flows derived from them become restricted for use in meeting obligations to the trusts’ creditors. The trusts have ownership of cash balances that also have restrictions, the amounts of which are reported in restricted ~~cash—~~cash – for securitization investors. Investment of trust cash balances is limited to investments that are permitted under the governing documents of the trusts and which have maturities no later than the related date on which funds must be made available for distribution to trust investors. With the exception of the seller’s interest in trust receivables, the Company’s interests in trust assets are generally subordinate to the interests of third-party investors and, as such, may not be realized by the Company if needed to absorb deficiencies in cash flows that are allocated to the investors in the trusts’ debt. The carrying values of these ~~trust~~restricted assets, which are presented on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as relating to securitization activities, are shown in the table below (dollars in thousands):


	August 31, 2010			February 28, 2011		November 30, 2010
Cash collateral accounts(1)	$	510,790		$	345,000	$	459,474
Collections and interest funding accounts		180,908			169,921		904,284

Restricted cash—for securitization investors		691,698			514,921		1,363,758
Investors’ interests held by third-party investors		14,871,057			13,694,740		14,921,057
Investors’ interests held by wholly owned subsidiaries of Discover Bank		4,511,478			4,595,532		4,608,210
Seller’s interest		15,406,923			15,110,509		14,923,722

Loan receivables—restricted for securitization investors⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		34,789,458			33,400,781		34,452,989
Allowance for loan losses⁽¹⁾		(2,756,199	)
Allowance for loan losses allocated to securitized loan receivables⁽²⁾					2,207,480		2,431,399

Net loan receivables		32,033,259			31,193,301		32,021,590
Other		24,170			23,872		24,083

Carrying value of assets of consolidated variable interest entities	$	32,749,127		$	31,732,094	$	33,409,431

(1)	Amount pledged as collateral against a long-term borrowing.

(2)

The Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at an amount sufficient to absorb probable losses inherent in all loan receivables, which includes all loan receivables in the trusts. Therefore, credit risk associated with the transferred receivables is fully reflected on the Company’s ~~statement of financial condition~~balance sheet in accordance with GAAP.

The debt securities issued by the consolidated VIEs are subject to credit, payment and interest rate risks on the transferred credit card loan receivables. To protect investors, the securitization structures include certain features that could result in earlier-than-expected repayment of the securities. The primary investor protection feature relates to the availability and adequacy of cash flows in the securitized pool of receivables to meet contractual requirements. Insufficient cash flows would trigger the early repayment of the securities. This is referred to as the “economic early amortization” feature.

Investors are allocated cash flows derived from activities related to the accounts comprising the securitized pool of receivables, the amounts of which reflect finance charges billed, certain fee assessments, allocations of

merchant discount and interchange, and recoveries on charged-off accounts. From these cash flows, investors are reimbursed for charge-offs occurring within the securitized pool of receivables and receive a contractual rate of return and Discover Bank is paid a servicing fee as servicer. Any cash flows remaining in excess of these requirements are reported to investors as excess spread. An excess spread rate of less than 0% for a contractually specified period, generally a three-month average, would trigger an economic early amortization event. In such an event, the Company would be required to seek immediate sources of replacement funding. Apart from the restricted assets related to securitization activities, the investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to the Company’s other assets or credit for a shortage in cash flows.

The Company is required to maintain a contractual minimum level of receivables in the trust in excess of the face value of outstanding investors’ interests. This excess is referred to as the minimum seller’s interest requirement. The required minimum seller’s interest in the pool of trust receivables, which is included in credit card loan receivables restricted for securitization investors, is set at approximately 7% in excess of the total investors’ interests (which includes interests held by third parties as well as those certificated interests held by the Company). If the level of receivables in the trust was to fall below the required minimum, the Company would be required to add receivables from the unrestricted pool of receivables, which would increase the amount of credit card loan receivables restricted for securitization investors. A decline in the amount of the excess seller’s interest could occur if balance repayments and charge-offs exceeded new lending on the securitized accounts or as a result of changes in total outstanding investors’ interests. If the Company could not add enough receivables to satisfy the requirement, an early amortization (or repayment) of investors’ interests would be triggered.

Another feature of the Company’s securitization structure that is designed to protect investors’ interests from loss, which is applicable only to the notes issued from DCENT, is a reserve account funding requirement in which excess cash flows generated by the transferred loan receivables are held at the trust. This funding requirement is triggered when DCENT’s three-month average excess spread rate decreases to below 4.50%, with increasing funding requirements as excess spread levels decline below preset levels to 0%.

In addition to performance measures associated with the transferred credit card loan receivables, there are other events or conditions which could trigger an early amortization event. As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, no economic or other early amortization events have occurred.

The tables below provide information concerning investors’ interests and related excess spreads at ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 (dollars in thousands):


	Investors’ Interests⁽¹⁾		# of Series Outstanding	Investors’ Interests⁽¹⁾		# of Series Outstanding
Discover Card Master Trust I	$	8,443,987	12	$	5,938,317		10
Discover Card Execution Note Trust (DiscoverSeries notes)		10,938,548	19		12,351,955		26

Total investors’ interests	$	19,382,535	31	$	18,290,272		36

(1)	Investors’ interests include third-party interests and subordinated interests held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of Discover Bank.


	3-Month Rolling Average Excess Spread^(1)(2)(3)
Group excess spread percentage	~~12.86~~	14.40	%
DiscoverSeries excess spread percentage	~~12.28~~	14.01	%

(1)

DCMT certificates refer to the higher of the Group excess spread ~~(as shown above)~~ or their applicable series excess spread ~~in assessing whether an economic early amortization has been triggered.~~(not shown) and DiscoverSeries notes refer to the higher of the Group or DiscoverSeries excess spread ~~(both of which are shown above)~~ in assessing whether an economic early amortization has ~~occurred.~~been triggered.

(2)

Discount Series (DCMT 2009-SD)~~, which was issued in September 2009,~~ makes principal collections available for reallocation to other series to cover shortfalls in interest and servicing fees and to reimburse charge-offs. Three-month rolling average excess spread rates ~~reflect~~reflected the availability of these additional collections.

~~(3)~~

Excess spread rates used in determining economic early amortization events and other triggers are reflective of the performance of all outstanding investors’ interests, including subordinated interests held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of Discover Bank.

The Company continues to own and service the accounts that generate the loan receivables held by the trusts. Discover Bank receives servicing fees from the trusts based on a percentage of the monthly investor principal balance outstanding. Although the fee income to Discover Bank offsets the fee expense to the trusts and thus is eliminated in consolidation, failure to service the transferred loan receivables in accordance with contractual requirements could lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing income.

Student Loan Securitization Activities

The ~~following disclosures apply~~Company’s student loan securitizations are accounted for as secured borrowings and the trusts are treated as consolidated subsidiaries of the Company. Trust receivables underlying third-party investors’ interests are recorded in other loan receivables, and the related debt issued by the trusts is reported in long-term borrowings. The assets of the Company’s consolidated VIEs are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral for other borrowings and the cash flows from these restricted assets may be used only to pay obligations of the trust.

Under terms of all the trust arrangements, the Company has the option, but not the obligation, to provide financial support, but has never provided such support. A substantial portion of the credit risk associated with the securitized loans has been transferred to third parties under private credit insurance or indemnification. See Note 2: Business Combinations.

The carrying values of these restricted assets, which are presented on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as relating to securitization activities, ofare shown in the Company prior to December 1, 2009, when transfers of receivables to the trusts were treated as sales in accordance with prior GAAP. At November 30, 2009, the Company’s retained interests in credit card securitizations were accounted for as followstable below (dollars in thousands):

   November 30,
2009
Available-for-sale investment securities
   $ 2,204,969
Held-to-maturity investment securities
   2,296,139
Loan receivables (seller’s interest)⁽¹⁾
   9,852,352
Amounts due from asset securitization:

Cash collateral accounts⁽²⁾
   822,585
Accrued interest receivable
   519,275
Interest-only strip receivable
   117,579
Other subordinated retained interests
   220,288
Other
   12,324

Amounts due from asset securitization
   1,692,051

Total retained interests
   $ 16,045,511


	February 28, 2011
Restricted cash for securitization investors	$	161,153
Student loan receivables at fair value	$	3,006,809
Other assets	$	10,549

~~(1)~~

~~Loan receivables net of allowance for loan losses were $9.1 billion at November 30, 2009.~~

~~(2)~~

~~$0.8 billion was pledged as security against a long-term borrowing.~~

Retained interests classified as available-for-sale investment securities at November 30, 2009 were carried at amounts that approximated fair value with changes in the fair value estimates recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Retained interests classified as held-to-maturity investment securities were carried at amortized cost. All other retained interests in credit card asset securitizations were recorded in amounts due from asset securitization at amounts that approximated fair value.

Key estimates and sensitivities of fair values reported at November 30, 2009 of certain retained interests to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those estimates were as follows (dollars in millions):

   November 30,
2009
Interest-only receivable strip (carrying amount/fair value)
   $ 118
Weighted average life (in months)
   3.5
Weighted average payment rate (rate per month)
   18.70 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
   $ (4 )
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
   $ (7 )
Weighted average principal charge-offs (rate per annum)
   9.91 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
   $ (46 )
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
   $ (81 )
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)
   16.50 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
   $ —
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
   $ (1 )
Cash collateral accounts (carrying amount/fair value)
   $ 823
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)
   1.99 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
   $ (3 )
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
   $ (7 )
Certificated retained beneficial interests reported as available-for-sale investment securities (carrying amount/fair value)
   $ 2,205
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)
   6.58 %
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change
   $ (14 )
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change
   $ (27 )

The sensitivity analyses of the interest-only strip receivable, cash collateral accounts and certificated retained beneficial interests are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation in an estimate generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the estimate to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular estimate on the fair value of the interest-only strip receivable, specifically, is calculated independent of changes in any other estimate; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower payments and increased charge-offs), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. In addition, the sensitivity analyses do not consider any action that the Company may take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in the key estimates.

During the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009, the Company recognized a net revaluation of its subordinated retained interests, principally the interest-only strip receivable, consisting of a $68.9 million gain and a $122.3 million loss, respectively, in securitization income in the condensed consolidated statements of income. For the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009, the Company securitized $1.5 billion and $2.2 billion of receivables, which resulted in an initial gain of $7.9 and $8.8 million for the respective periods.

~~The following table summarizes certain cash flow information related to the securitized pool of loan receivables (dollars in millions):~~

For the Three Months
Ended August 31,
2009 For the Nine Months
Ended August 31,
2009
Proceeds from third-party investors in new credit card securitizations
$ 1,496 $ 2,246
Proceeds from collections reinvested in previous credit card securitizations
$ 11,964 $ 33,569
Contractual servicing fees received
$ 121 $ 358
Cash flows received from retained interests
$ 352 $ 1,349
Purchases of previously transferred credit card loan receivables (securitization maturities)
$ 1,382 $ 4,371

Key estimates used in measuring the fair value of the interest-only strip receivable at the date of securitization that resulted from credit card securitizations completed during the nine months ended August 31, 2009 were as follows:


		~~For the Nine Months~~ ~~Ended~~ ~~August 31, 2009~~
~~Weighted average life (in months)~~		~~1.8 – 4.8~~
~~Payment rate (rate per month)~~		~~17.18% – 17.66%~~
~~Principal charge-offs (rate per annum)~~		~~9.66% – 9.81%~~
~~Discount rate (rate per annum)~~		~~16.00%~~

The tables below present quantitative information about delinquencies and net principal charge-offs of securitized and non-securitized credit card loans for periods in which transfers of receivables to the securitization trusts were accounted for as sales (dollars in millions):

   November 30,
2009
Loans Outstanding:

Managed credit card loans
   $ 47,465
Less: Securitized credit card loans
   27,235

Owned credit card loans
   $ 20,230

Loans Over 30 Days Delinquent:

Managed credit card loans
   $ 2,657
Less: Securitized credit card loans
   1,540

Owned credit card loans
   $ 1,117

   For the Three Months
Ended August 31,
2009    For the Nine Months
Ended August 31,
2009
Average Loans:

Managed credit card loans
   $ 48,642    $ 49,328
Less: Securitized credit card loans
   24,591    23,868

Owned credit card loans
   $ 24,051    $ 25,460

Net Principal Charge-offs:

Managed credit card loans
   $ 1,058    $ 2,866
Less: Securitized credit card loans
   544    1,407

Owned credit card loans
   $ 514    $ 1,459

6. Deposits

The Company offers its deposit products, including certificates of deposit, money market accounts, online savings accounts and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) certificates of deposit to customers through two channels: (i) through direct marketing, internet origination and affinity relationships (“direct-to-consumer deposits”); and (ii) indirectly through contractual arrangements with securities brokerage firms (“brokered deposits”). ~~During the nine months ended August 31, 2010, the Company acquired approximately $1 billion of direct-to-consumer deposit accounts from a third party.~~ As of ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009,~~2010, the Company had approximately ~~$19.1~~$21.8 billion and ~~$12.6~~$20.6 billion, respectively, of direct-to-consumer deposits and approximately ~~$15.1~~$12.9 billion and ~~$19.5~~$13.7 billion, respectively, of brokered deposits.

A summary of interest-bearing deposit accounts is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	August 31, 2010			November 30, 2009			February 28, 2011				November 30, 2010
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000⁽¹⁾	$	20,864,065		$	22,587,898		$	19,329,927			$	19,797,420
Certificates of deposit from amounts of $100,000⁽¹⁾to less than $250,000⁽¹⁾		4,358,026			2,918,004			4,765,285				4,626,792
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $250,000⁽¹⁾or greater		1,163,140			1,129,945			1,152,040				1,146,843
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts		7,763,701			5,392,659			9,481,077		��		8,738,784

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	34,148,932		$	32,028,506		$	34,728,329			$	34,309,839

Average annual interest rate		3.18	%		3.94	%		2.81	%			3.12	%

(1)	$100,000 represents the basic insurance amount previously covered by the ~~FDIC although, effective~~FDIC. Effective July 21, 2010, the basic insurance per depositor was permanently increased to $250,000.

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, certificates of deposit maturing during the remainder of ~~2010,~~2011, over the next four years and thereafter were as follows (dollars in thousands):


Year	Amount		Amount
2010	$	2,794,711
2011	$	9,029,215	$	8,136,884
2012	$	5,972,694	$	7,570,052
2013	$	4,553,847	$	4,878,707
2014	$	1,985,343	$	2,036,652
2015			$	1,804,175
Thereafter	$	2,049,421	$	820,782

7. Long-Term Borrowings

Long-term borrowings consist of borrowings and capital leases having original maturities of one year or more. The following table provides a summary of the Company’s long-term borrowings and weighted average interest rates on balances outstanding at period end (dollars in thousands):

August 31, 2010 November 30, 2009 Interest Rate
Terms Maturity
Outstanding Interest
Rate Outstanding Interest
Rate
Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust

Fixed rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾
$ 2,598,208 5.47 % $ —   —      5.10% to
5.65% fixed
Various April 2011—
September 2017
Floating rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾
10,771,057 0.75 % —   —      1-month LIBOR⁽²⁾ +
3 to 130 basis points Various November 2010—
July 2014
Floating rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾
1,250,000 0.88 % —   —      3-month LIBOR⁽²⁾ +
34 basis points December 2012
Floating rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾
250,000 1.00 % —   —      Commercial Paper
rate + 70 basis points April 2013

Total Long-Term Borrowings—owed to securitization investors
14,869,265 —
Discover Financial Services (Parent Company)

Floating rate senior notes
—   —      400,000 0.83 % 3-month LIBOR⁽²⁾
+ 53 basis points
June 2010
Fixed rate senior notes due 2017
399,447 6.45 % 399,385 6.45 % 6.45% fixed June 2017
Fixed rate senior notes due 2019
400,000 10.25 % 400,000 10.25 % 10.25% fixed July 2019
Discover Bank

Subordinated bank notes due 2019
698,337 8.70 % 698,202 8.70 % 8.70% fixed November 2019
Subordinated bank notes due 2020
496,666 7.00 % —   —      7.00% fixed April 2020
Floating rate secured borrowing⁽³⁾
104,476 0.80 % 528,246 0.74 % Commercial Paper
rate + 50 basis points December 2010⁽³⁾
Floating rate secured borrowing⁽³⁾
236,050 0.73 % —   —      1-month LIBOR⁽²⁾
+ 45 basis points
December 2010⁽³⁾
Floating rate secured borrowing⁽⁴⁾
503,935 0.76 % —   —      Commercial Paper
rate + 50 basis points August 2013⁽⁴⁾
Capital lease obligations
577 6.26 % 2,268 6.26 % 6.26% fixed Various

Total Other Long-Term Borrowings
2,839,488 2,428,101

Total long-term borrowings
$ 17,708,753 $ 2,428,101


	February 28, 2011						November 30, 2010
	Outstanding			Interest Rate			Outstanding			Interest Rate			Interest Rate Terms		Maturity
*Securitized Debt*
Fixed rate asset-backed securities (including discount of $1,521)	$	2,598,479			5.47	%	$	2,598,343			5.47	%		5.10% to 5.65% fixed		Various April 2011— September 2017
Floating rate asset-backed securities		9,094,740			0.84	%		10,621,057			0.75	%		1-month LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3 to 130 basis points		Various March 2011— September 2015
Floating rate asset-backed securities		1,250,000			0.64	%		1,250,000			0.63	%		3-month LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 34 basis points		December 2012
Floating rate asset-backed securities and other borrowings		750,000			0.95	%		450,000			0.98	%		Commercial Paper rate + 70 basis points		Various June 2011— April 2013

*Total Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust*		13,693,219						14,919,400
Floating rate asset-backed securities (including discount of $264,312)		1,542,120			0.49	%		0						3-month LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 7 to 45 basis points		Various April 2018— July 2036⁽²⁾
Floating rate asset-backed securities (including discount of $4,303)		693,883			4.25	%		0						Prime rate +100 basis points		June 2031⁽²⁾
Floating rate asset-backed securities (including premium of $3,314)		183,841			4.00	%		0						Prime rate + 75 basis points		July 2042⁽²⁾
Floating rate asset-backed securities (including premium of $7,535)		417,955			3.77	%		0						1-month LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 350 basis points		July 2042⁽²⁾

*Total SLC Private Student Loan Trusts*		2,837,799						0

*Total Long-Term Borrowings—owed to securitization investors*		16,531,018						14,919,400
*Discover Financial Services (Parent Company)*
Fixed rate senior notes due 2017
Principal value (including discount of $512)		399,488			6.45	%		399,467			6.45	%		6.45% fixed		June 2017
Fair value adjustment⁽³⁾		(19,995	)					(7,888	)

Net book value		379,493						391,579
Fixed rate senior notes due 2019		400,000			10.25	%		400,000			10.25	%		10.25% fixed		July 2019
*Discover Bank*
Subordinated bank notes due 2019 (including discount of $1,573)		698,427			8.70	%		698,382			8.70	%		8.70% fixed		November 2019
Subordinated bank notes due 2020 (including discount of $3,161)		496,839			7.00	%		496,753			7.00	%		7.00% fixed		April 2020
Floating rate secured borrowings		0			0.00	%		93,980			0.79	%		Commercial Paper rate + 50 basis points		December 2010
Floating rate secured borrowings		0			0.00	%		212,336			0.70	%		1-month LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 45 basis points		December 2010
Floating rate secured borrowings⁽⁴⁾		484,198			0.74	%		492,910			0.66	%		Commercial Paper rate + 50 basis points		August 2013⁽⁴⁾
Capital lease obligations		195			6.26	%		388			6.26	%		6.26% fixed		Various

Total long-term borrowings	$	18,990,170					$	17,705,728

(1)

Upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009, the Company consolidated $22.3 billion of securitized loan receivables and the related debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information. Asset-backed securities are collateralized by loan receivables as described in Footnote 5: Credit Card Securitization Activities.

~~(2)~~

London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).

~~(3)~~(2)

~~This loan facility was entered into to fund cash collateral account loans, which provide credit enhancement to certain DCMT certificates.~~ Repayment of this debt is dependent upon the ~~available balances~~timing of principal and interest payments on the ~~cash collateral accounts at the various maturities of~~ underlying ~~securitization transactions, with~~student loans. The dates shown represent final maturity dates.

(3)

The Company uses interest rate swaps to hedge this long-term borrowing against changes in ~~December 2010. The facility has two funding agents, one of which re-priced from commercial paper conduit costs~~fair value attributable to ~~LIBOR-based pricing effective~~changes in ~~July 2010.~~LIBOR. See Note 14: Derivatives and Hedging Activities.

(4)

Under a program established by the U.S. Department of Education, this loan facility was entered into to fund certain federal student ~~loans.~~loans, which were held for sale at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010. Principal and interest payments on the underlying student loans will reduce the balance of the secured borrowing over time, with final maturity in August 2013. However, upon sale of the loans, this loan facility will be repaid.

The Company has an unsecured credit agreement that is effective through May 2012. The agreement provides for a revolving credit commitment of up to $2.4 billion (of which the Company may borrow up to 30% and Discover Bank may borrow up to 100% of the total commitment). As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had no outstanding balances due under the facility. The credit agreement provides for a commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility, which can range from 0.07% to 0.175% depending on the index debt ratings. Loans outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a margin above the Federal Funds rate, LIBOR, the ~~Euro Interbank Offered Rate~~EURIBOR or the Euro Reference rate. The terms of the credit agreement include various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants related to the maintenance of certain capitalization and tangible net worth levels, and certain double leverage, delinquency and Tier 1 capital to managed loans ratios. The credit agreement also includes customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money and bankruptcy-related defaults. The commitment may be terminated upon an event of default.

The Company also has access to committed undrawn capacity through ~~privately placed asset-backed conduits through bilateral agreements~~private securitizations to support the funding of its credit card loan receivables. As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the total commitment of secured credit facilities through private providers was ~~$3.0~~$5.5 billion, of which ~~$0.3~~$0.8 billion had been used and was included in long-term ~~borrowings—owed to securitization investors~~borrowings at ~~August 31, 2010.~~February 28, 2011. Access to the unused portions of the secured credit facilities expires in 2012 and 2013. Borrowings outstanding under each facility bear interest at a margin above LIBOR or the asset-backed commercial paper costs of each individual conduit provider. The terms of each agreement provide for a commitment fee to be paid on the unused capacity, and include various affirmative and negative covenants, including performance metrics and legal requirements similar to those required to issue any term securitization transaction.

8.	~~Preferred Stock~~

On April 21, 2010, the Company completed the repurchase of all the outstanding shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Preferred Stock”) issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program of the Troubled Asset Relief Program on March 13, 2009 for $1.2 billion.

The Preferred Stock was issued at a discount to reflect the value of the warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 20,500,413 shares of common stock of the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the initial sale of the Preferred Stock. As a result of the repurchase of the Preferred Stock, at the redemption date the Company accelerated the accretion of the remaining discount of $61 million. On July 7, 2010, the Company repurchased the Warrant from the U.S Treasury for $172 million.

9. ~~Employee Benefit Plans~~

The Company sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans for its eligible U.S. employees. However, as of December 31, 2008, the pension plans no longer provide for the accrual of future benefits. For more information, see the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009.

~~Net periodic benefit (income) cost expensed by the Company included the following components (dollars in thousands):~~

   Pension
   For the Three Months Ended
August 31, For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
         2010             2009             2010             2009
Service cost, benefits earned during the period
   $ —      $ 255    $ —      $ 765
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
   5,214    5,047    15,642    15,141
Expected return on plan assets
   (5,823 ) (6,027 ) (17,469 ) (18,081 )
Net amortization
   406    (2 ) 1,218    (6 )
Net settlements and curtailments
   68    —      204    —

Net periodic benefit income
   $ (135 ) $ (727 ) $ (405 ) $ (2,181 )

   Postretirement
   For the Three Months Ended
August 31, For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
         2010             2009             2010             2009
Service cost, benefits earned during the period
   $ 264    $ 194    $ 792    $ 582
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
   347    394    1,041    1,182
Net amortization
   (1 ) (38 ) (3 ) (114 )

Net periodic benefit cost
   $ 610    $ 550    $ 1,830    $ 1,650

~~10.~~ Income Taxes

Income tax expense consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,				For the Nine Months Ended August 31,					For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010		2009		2010		2009			2011			2010
Current:
U.S. federal	$	68,942	$	201,615	$	166,541	$	653,888		$	138,848		$	37,247
U.S. state and local		24,451		41,736		38,512		95,083			2,407			(3,970	)
International		53		665		298		2,483			1,345			471

Total		93,446		244,016		205,351		751,454			142,600			33,748
Deferred:
U.S. federal		73,149		109,028		61,301		(111,923	)		108,629			(92,799	)
U.S. state and local		4,931		9,441		1,830		(12,537	)		3,891			(8,119	)
International											(9	)		0

Total		78,080		118,469		63,131		(124,460	)		112,511			(100,918	)

Income tax expense	$	171,526	$	362,485	$	268,482	$	626,994
Income tax expense (benefit)										$	255,111		$	(67,170	)

The following table reconciles the Company’s effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate:


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,				For the Nine Months Ended August 31,				For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010		2009		2010		2009		2011			2010
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
U.S. state and local income taxes and other, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits	4.8		3.5		4.3		3.4
Valuation allowance—capital loss	—		—		—		1.5
Non-deductible compensation	0.1		0.1		0.5		0.5
U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefits										0.9			5.8
Other	(0.2	)	0.2		(0.5	)	—			(0.5	)		(1.5	)

Effective income tax rate	39.7	%	38.6	%	39.3	%	40.4	%		35.4	%		39.3	%

During the first quarter 2011, the Company decreased the amount of unrecognized tax benefits by $17.6 million as a result of the settlement of certain state examination issues and receiving confirmation of a state’s treatment on a position that was uncertain. The Company is under continuous examination by the IRS and the tax authorities for various states. The tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction; for example, the current IRS examination covers ~~1999~~2006 through ~~2005.~~June 30, 2007. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the taxing jurisdictions resulting from these and subsequent years’ examinations.

As part of its audit of ~~1999-2005,~~1999 through 2005, the IRS has proposed additional tax assessments. ~~The~~In August 2010, the Company filed an appeal with the IRS to protest the proposed adjustments. The ~~outcome~~Company does not anticipate that resolution of this matter will occur within the ~~appeal is not certain and the matter~~next twelve months as it is in the preliminary stage. ~~The~~Due to the uncertainty of the outcome of the appeal, the Company is unable to determine if the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. However, the Company believes that its reserve is sufficient to cover any penalties orand interest that would result ~~from~~in an increase in federal taxes due.

~~11.~~9. Earnings Per Share

Effective December 1, 2009, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on earnings per share, which clarifies that unvested stock-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and should be included in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) using the two-class method. The Company grants restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain employees under its stock-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividend equivalents in the same amount and at the same time as dividends paid to all common stockholders; these unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends. In accordance with the transition guidance, prior period EPS amounts have been restated to conform to current period presentation, although there was no material impact on the previously reported basic or diluted EPS.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS (dollars ~~and shares~~ in thousands, except per share amounts):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,						For the Nine Months Ended August 31,						For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2011			2010
Numerator:
Net income	$	260,617		$	577,454		$	415,146		$	923,648
Net income (loss)													$	464,892		$	(103,538	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			(15,307	)		(23,811	)		(28,573	)		0			(15,307	)
Preferred stock discount accretion		—			(2,760	)		(66,492	)		(6,048	)
Preferred stock accretion														0			(3,388	)

Net income available to common stockholders		260,617			559,387			324,843			889,027
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders														464,892			(122,233	)
Income allocated to participating securities(1)		(2,423	) )		(6,459	)		(3,230	)		(12,521	)		(5,464	)		0

Net income allocated to common stockholders	$	258,194		$	552,928		$	321,613		$	876,506
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders													$	459,428		$	(122,233	)

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		544,314			513,098			543,874			491,839
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding														545,052			543,422
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents		2,768			3,952			6,237			920			489			0

Weighted average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents		547,082			517,050			550,111			492,759
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding and common stock equivalents														545,541			543,422

Basic earnings per share	$	0.47		$	1.08		$	0.59		$	1.78		$	0.84		$	(0.22	)
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.47		$	1.07		$	0.58		$	1.78		$	0.84		$	(0.22	)

(1)	For the three months ended February 28, 2010, no portion of the net loss incurred by the Company was allocated to participating securities as they do not participate in net losses incurred by the Company.

The following securities were considered anti-dilutive and therefore were excluded from the denominator in the computation of diluted EPS (shares in thousands):

   For the Three
Months Ended
August 31,    For the Nine
Months Ended
August 31,
   2010    2009    2010    2009
Unexercised stock options
   3,944    4,319    3,418    4,414


	For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2011		2010
Unexercised stock options		554		4,081
Warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury		0		7,736

~~12.~~10.

Capital Adequacy

The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines of the Federal Reserve, and Discover Bank (the “Bank”), the Company’s main banking subsidiary, is subject to various regulatory capital requirements as administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in the initiation of certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial position and results of the Company and the Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of

assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (as defined in the regulations) of total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

Under regulatory capital requirements, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum levels of capital that are dependent upon the risk-weighted amount or average level of the financial institution’s assets, specifically (a) 8% to 10% of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets (“total risk-based capital ratio”), (b) 4% to 6% of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (“Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio”) and (c) 4% to 5% of Tier 1 capital to average assets (“Tier 1 leverage ratio”). To be categorized as “well-capitalized,” the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company and the Bank met the requirements for well-capitalized status and there have been no conditions or events that management believes have changed the Company’s or the Bank’s category.

The following table shows the actual capital amounts and ratios of the Company and the Bank as of ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009~~2010 and comparisons of each to the regulatory minimum and “well-capitalized” requirements (dollars in thousands):

   Actual Minimum Capital
Requirements Capital Requirements To Be
Classified as
Well-Capitalized
   Amount Ratio Amount Ratio     Amount         Ratio
August 31, 2010⁽¹⁾ :

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)

Discover Financial Services
   $ 7,595,473 15.5 % $ 3,931,518 ³ 8.0 % $ 4,914,398 ³ 10.0 %
Discover Bank
   $ 7,601,827 15.7 % $ 3,876,790 ³ 8.0 % $ 4,845,987 ³ 10.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

Discover Financial Services
   $ 5,747,535 11.7 % $ 1,965,759 ³ 4.0 % $ 2,948,639 ³ 6.0 %
Discover Bank
   $ 5,762,334 11.9 % $ 1,938,395 ³ 4.0 % $ 2,907,592 ³ 6.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

Discover Financial Services
   $ 5,747,535 9.5 % $ 2,417,397 ³ 4.0 % $ 3,021,746 ³ 5.0 %
Discover Bank
   $ 5,762,334 9.7 % $ 2,385,823 ³ 4.0 % $ 2,982,279 ³ 5.0 %
November 30, 2009:

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)

Discover Financial Services
   $ 9,516,965 17.9 % $ 4,262,230 ³ 8.0 % $ 5,327,788 ³ 10.0 %
Discover Bank
   $ 8,210,450 15.8 % $ 4,168,103 ³ 8.0 % $ 5,210,129 ³ 10.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

Discover Financial Services
   $ 8,139,309 15.3 % $ 2,131,115 ³ 4.0 % $ 3,196,673 ³ 6.0 %
Discover Bank
   $ 6,572,320 12.6 % $ 2,084,052 ³ 4.0 % $ 3,126,077 ³ 6.0 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

Discover Financial Services
   $ 8,139,309 18.1 % $ 1,798,937 ³ 4.0 % $ 2,248,672 ³ 5.0 %
Discover Bank
   $ 6,572,320 15.9 % $ 1,657,397 ³ 4.0 % $ 2,071,746 ³ 5.0 %

~~(1)~~

Upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009, the Company recorded a $1.4 billion reduction to retained earnings, which reduced total capital and Tier 1 capital by the same amount, and a $21.1 billion increase to total assets, which impacted average assets. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information. Risk-weighted assets were not significantly impacted by the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 as the Company began including securitized assets in its risk-weighted asset calculation beginning in the third quarter 2009 due to actions it took to adjust the credit enhancement structure of the securitization trusts.


	Actual					Minimum Capital Requirements					Capital Requirements To Be Classified as Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
February 28, 2011:
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	8,442,146		16.0	%	$	4,229,495		³8.0	%	$	5,286,869		³10.0	%
Discover Bank	$	8,143,844		15.7	%	$	4,161,583		³8.0	%	$	5,201,978		³10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	6,556,730		12.4	%	$	2,114,747		³4.0	%	$	3,172,121		³6.0	%
Discover Bank	$	6,268,908		12.1	%	$	2,080,791		³4.0	%	$	3,121,187		³6.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	6,556,730		10.2	%	$	2,559,973		³4.0	%	$	3,199,967		³5.0	%
Discover Bank	$	6,268,908		9.9	%	$	2,522,435		³4.0	%	$	3,153,044		³5.0	%
November 30, 2010:
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	7,946,619		15.9	%	$	3,989,689		³8.0	%	$	4,987,111		³10.0	%
Discover Bank	$	7,817,205		15.9	%	$	3,923,344		³8.0	%	$	4,904,180		³10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	6,095,000		12.2	%	$	1,994,844		³4.0	%	$	2,992,266		³6.0	%
Discover Bank	$	5,975,824		12.2	%	$	1,961,672		³4.0	%	$	2,942,508		³6.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	6,095,000		9.9	%	$	2,464,324		³4.0	%	$	3,080,406		³5.0	%
Discover Bank	$	5,975,824		9.8	%	$	2,431,610		³4.0	%	$	3,039,512		³5.0	%

~~13.~~11. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

Lease commitments. The Company leases various office space and equipment under capital and non-cancelable operating leases which expire at various dates through ~~2018.~~2021. At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, future minimum payments on leases with original terms in excess of one year consist of the following (dollars in thousands):


	Capitalized Leases		Operating Leases		Capitalized Leases		Operating Leases
2010	$	197	$	1,526
2011		395		5,511	$	197	$	6,323
2012		—		6,172		0		9,906
2013		—		4,662		0		8,299
2014		—		4,616		0		6,986
2015						0		6,133
Thereafter		—		16,342		0		14,460

Total minimum lease payments		592	$	38,829		197	$	52,107

Less: Amount representing interest		15				2

Present value of net minimum lease payments	$	577			$	195

Unused commitments to extend credit. At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had unused commitments to extend credit for consumer loans and commercial loans of approximately ~~$166~~$165 billion. Such commitments arise primarily from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards and certain other consumer loan products, provided there is no violation of conditions in the related agreement. These commitments, substantially all of which the Company can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage, customer creditworthiness and loan qualification.

Commitments to purchase private student loans.Prior to its acquisition by the Company on December 31, 2010, SLC had an agreement with Citibank providing for the origination and servicing of private student loans. Citibank would originate and fund such loans and, after final disbursement, SLC would purchase the loans from Citibank. This agreement between SLC and Citibank was terminated on December 31, 2010, at which time the Company entered into an agreement with Citibank to purchase (i) eligible private student loans originated by Citibank prior to December 31, 2010 and (ii) any private student loans originated by Citibank on or after December 31, 2010 under a new loan origination agreement entered into between Citibank and SLC on December 31, 2010. The Company has agreed to purchase the loans at the funded amount (plus accrued interest and less any capitalized fees for any loans first funded prior to December 31, 2010) and, for any loans first funded by Citibank on December 31, 2010 or later, pay a premium equal to 0.125%. The Company completed the first purchase of loan participations under this agreement on January 3, 2011. The agreement expires on December 31, 2011, although the Company is permitted to extend the agreement for up to two additional six-month terms, or through December 31, 2012. Although the agreement does not set forth a minimum or maximum amount of loans to be purchased, the Company must purchase all eligible loans originated by Citibank, which the Company estimates to be $0.5 billion to $1 billion through the end of the first term, or December 31, 2011. As of February 28, 2011, the Company had committed to purchase $14 million of loans under this agreement.

Secured Borrowing Representations and Warranties. As part of the Company’s financing activities, the Company provides representations and warranties that certain assets pledged as collateral in secured borrowing arrangements conform to specified guidelines. Due diligence is performed by the Company which is intended to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. If the assets pledged as collateral do not meet certain conforming guidelines, the Company may be required to replace, repurchase or sell such assets. In its credit card securitization activities, the Company would replace nonconforming receivables through the allocation of excess seller’s interest or from additional transfers from the unrestricted pool of receivables. If the Company could not

add enough receivables to satisfy the requirement, an early amortization (or repayment) of investors’ interests would be triggered. In its student loan securitizations, the Company would generally repurchase the loans from the trust at the outstanding principal amount plus interest.

The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make would be equal to the current outstanding balances of third-party investor interests in credit card asset-backed securities plus the principal amount of any other outstanding secured borrowings. The Company has recorded substantially all of the maximum potential amount of future payments in long-term borrowings on the Company’s statement of financial condition. The Company has not recorded any incremental contingent liability associated with its secured borrowing representations and warranties. Management believes that the probability of having to replace, repurchase or sell assets pledged as collateral under secured borrowing arrangements, including an early amortization event, is low.

Guarantees. The Company has obligations under certain guarantee arrangements, including contracts and indemnification agreements, which contingently require the Company to make payments to the guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying asset, liability or equity security of a guaranteed party, rate or index. Also included as guarantees are contracts that contingently require the Company to make payments to a guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. The Company’s use of guarantees is disclosed below by type of guarantee.

Counterparty Settlement Guarantees. Diners Club and DFS Services LLC, on behalf of PULSE, have various counterparty exposures, which are listed below.

•

Merchant ~~Guarantee.~~Guarantee. Diners Club has entered into contractual relationships with certain international merchants, which generally include travel-related businesses, for the benefit of all Diners Club licensees. The licensees hold the primary liability to settle the transactions of their customers with these merchants. However, Diners Club retains a counterparty exposure if a licensee fails to meet its financial payment obligation to one of these merchants.

•

ATM Guarantee.PULSE entered into contractual relationships with certain international ATM acquirers in which DFS Services LLC retains counterparty exposure if an issuer fails to fulfill its settlement obligation.

The maximum potential amount of future payments related to such contingent obligations is dependent upon the transaction volume processed between the time a counterparty defaults on its settlement and the time at which the Company disables the settlement of any further transactions for the defaulting party, which could be up to one month depending on the type of guarantee/counterparty. However, there is no limitation on the maximum amount the Company may be liable to pay. The actual amount of the potential exposure cannot be quantified as the Company cannot determine whether particular counterparties will fail to meet their settlement obligations. While the Company has some contractual remedies to offset these counterparty settlement exposures (such as letters of credit or pledged deposits), in the event that all licensees and/or issuers were to become unable to settle their transactions, the Company estimates its maximum potential counterparty exposures to these settlement guarantees, based on historical transaction volume of up to one month, would be as follows:


	August 31, 2010		February 28, 2011
Diners Club:
Merchant guarantee (in millions)	$	224	$	261
PULSE:
ATM guarantee (in thousands)	$	833	$	910

With regard to the counterparty settlement guarantees discussed above, the Company believes that the estimated amounts of maximum potential future payments are not representative of the Company’s actual

potential loss exposure given Diners Club’s and PULSE’s insignificant historical losses from these counterparty exposures. As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had not recorded any contingent liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements for these counterparty exposures, and management believes that the probability of any payments under these arrangements is low.

The Company also retains counterparty exposure for the obligations of Diners Club licensees that participate in the Citishare network, an electronic funds processing network. Through the Citishare network, Diners Club customers are able to access certain ATMs directly connected to the Citishare network. The Company’s maximum potential future payment under this counterparty exposure is limited to $15 million, subject to annual adjustment based on actual transaction experience. However, as of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had not recorded any contingent liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements related to this counterparty exposure, and management believes that the probability of any payments under this arrangement is low.

Merchant Chargeback ~~Guarantees.~~Guarantees. The Company issues ~~credit~~and permits third parties to issue payment cards and owns and operates the Discover Network. The Company is contingently liable for certain transactions processed on the Discover Network in the event of a dispute between the ~~credit~~payment card customer and a merchant. The contingent liability arises if the disputed transaction involves a merchant or merchant acquirer with whom the Discover Network has a direct relationship. If a dispute is resolved in the customer’s favor, the Discover Network will credit or refund the disputed amount to the Discover Network card issuer, who in turn credits its customer’s account. The Discover Network will then charge back the disputed amount of the payment card transaction to the merchant or merchant ~~acquirer.~~acquirer, where permitted by the applicable agreement, to seek recovery of amounts already paid to the merchant for payment card transactions. If the Discover Network is unable to collect the amount subject to dispute from the merchant or merchant acquirer it(e.g., in the event of merchant default or dissolution) or after expiration of the time period for chargebacks in the applicable agreement, the Discover Network will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the customer. In most instances, a ~~payment obligation~~loss by the Discover Network is unlikely to arise in connection with payments on card transactions because most

products or services are delivered when purchased, and credits are issued by merchants on returned items in a timely ~~fashion.~~fashion, thus minimizing the likelihood of cardholder disputes with respect to amounts paid by the Discover Network. However, where the product or service is not scheduled to be provided to the customer until ~~some~~a later date following the purchase, the likelihood of a contingent payment obligation by the Discover Network increases.

The maximum potential amount of ~~future payments related to~~obligations of the Discover Network arising as a result of such contingent obligations is estimated to be the portion of the total Discover Network transaction volume processed to date for which timely and valid disputes may be raised under applicable law and relevant issuer and customer agreements. There is no limitation on the maximum amount the Company may be liable to pay to issuers. However, the Company believes that such amount is not representative of the Company’s actual potential loss exposure based on the Company’s historical experience. The actual amount of the potential exposure cannot be quantified as the Company cannot determine whether the current or cumulative transaction volumes may include or result in disputed transactions.

The table below summarizes certain information regarding merchant chargeback guarantees:


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,				For the Nine Months Ended August 31,				For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010		2009		2010		2009		2011		2010
Losses related to merchant chargebacks (in thousands)	$	1,036	$	1,717	$	2,294	$	5,049	$	921	$	757
Aggregate transaction volume⁽¹⁾ (in millions)	$	25,990	$	24,258	$	74,645	$	69,768
Aggregate sales transaction volume (in millions)⁽¹⁾									$	25,787	$	23,996

(1)	Represents period transactions processed on the Discover Network to which a potential liability exists which, in aggregate, can differ from credit card sales volume.

The Company has not recorded any contingent liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements ~~related to~~for merchant chargeback guarantees ~~at August 31, 2010~~on February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009.~~2010. The Company mitigates ~~this~~the risk of potential loss exposure by withholding settlement from merchants, obtaining third party guarantees, or obtaining escrow deposits or letters of credit from certain merchant acquirers or merchants that are considered higher risk due to various factors such as time delays in the delivery of products or services. The table below provides information regarding ~~the~~ settlement withholdings and escrow deposits, which are recorded in interest-bearing deposit accounts, and accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition (in thousands):

   August 31,
2010    November 30,
2009
Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits
   $ 31,702    $ 38,129


	February 28, 2011		November 30, 2010
Settlement withholdings and escrow deposits	$	37,022	$	30,483

~~14.~~12.

Litigation

In the normal course of business, from time to time, the Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. The Company contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes an accrued liability for legal and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies which are both probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. The Company believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses (meaning those losses the likelihood of which is more than remote but less than likely) in excess of the reserves that the Company has established for legal proceedings is from $0 to $40 million. This estimated range of reasonably possible losses is based upon currently available information for those proceedings in which the Company is involved, takes into account the Company’s best estimate of such losses for those matters for which an estimate can be made, and does not represent the Company’s maximum potential loss exposure. The legal proceedings underlying the estimated range will change from time to time and actual results may vary significantly from the estimate.

The Company’s estimated range above involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings, the existence of numerous yet to be resolved issues, the breadth of the claims (often spanning multiple years and, in some cases, a wide range of business activities), unspecified damages and/or the novelty of the legal issues presented. The outcome of pending matters could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition, operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, the level of the Company’s income for such period, and could adversely affect the Company’s reputation.

The Company has historically relied on the arbitration clause in its cardmember agreements, which has in some instances limited the costs of, and the Company’s exposure to, litigation, but there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to be successful in enforcing its arbitration clause in the future. Legal challenges to the enforceability of these clauses have led most card issuers and may cause the Company to discontinue their use, and there are bills pending in Congress to directly or indirectly prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses. Further, the Company is involved in pending legal actions challenging its arbitration clause.

The Company is also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding the Company’s business including, among other matters, accounting, tax and operational matters, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, or other relief. For example, the Company received a notice of proposed assessment from the IRS related to its audit of the Company’s 1999-2005 tax years as further discussed in Note 8: Income Taxes.

On November 16, 2010, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company by a ~~lawsuit captionedDiscover Financial Services, Inc. v. Visa USA Inc., MasterCard Inc. et al.~~cardmember in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of ~~New York on October 4, 2004. Through this lawsuit~~California (Michele Bennett et al. v. Discover Card, a/k/a DFS Services LLC). The plaintiff alleges that the Company ~~sought to recover substantial~~contacted her, and members of the putative class, on their cellular telephones without their express consent in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). The TCPA provides for statutory damages of $500 for each violation ($1,500 for willful violations). Plaintiff seeks statutory damages for alleged negligent and ~~other appropriate relief in connection with Visa’s~~willful violations of the TCPA, attorneys’ fees, costs and ~~MasterCard’s illegal anticompetitive practices that, among other things, foreclosed the Company from the credit and debit network services markets.~~injunctive relief. The Company ~~executed an agreement~~will seek to ~~settle~~vigorously defend all claims asserted against it. The Company is not in a position at this time to assess the ~~lawsuit~~likely outcome or its exposure, if any, with ~~MasterCard and Visa for up~~respect to $2.75 billion on October 27, 2008, which became effective on November 4, 2008 upon receipt of the approval of Visa’s Class B shareholders. At the time of the Company’s 2007 spin-off from Morgan Stanley, the Company entered into an agreement with Morgan Stanley regarding the manner in which the antitrust case against Visa and MasterCard was to be pursued and settled, and how proceeds of the litigation were to be shared (the “Special Dividend Agreement”).this matter.

On ~~October 21, 2008, Morgan Stanley~~December 6, 2010, the Attorney General for the State of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against the Company in ~~New York Supreme~~the District Court for ~~New York~~Hennepin County, ~~seeking~~Minnesota (Minnesota v. Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank and DFS Services LLC). The lawsuit challenges the Company’s enrollment of Discover cardmembers in various fee based products under Minnesota law. The remedies sought in the lawsuit include an injunction prohibiting the Company from engaging in the alleged violations, restitution for all persons allegedly injured by the complained of practices, civil penalties and costs. The Company will seek to vigorously defend all claims asserted against it. The Company is not in a ~~declaration that Morgan Stanley did not breach~~position at this time to assess the ~~Special Dividend Agreement, did not interfere~~likely outcome or its exposure, if any, with ~~any~~respect to this matter.

There are eight putative class action cases pending in relation to the sale of the Company’s ~~existing or prospective agreements for resolution~~payment protection fee product. The cases were filed (all in United States District Courts) on July 8, 2010 in the Northern District of California (Walker, et al. v. DFS, Inc. and Discover Bank; subsequently transferred to the Northern District of Illinois); July 16, 2010 in the Central District of California (Conroy v. Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank); October 22, 2010 in the District of South Carolina (Alexander v. Discover Financial Services, Inc.; DFS Services LLC; Discover Bank; and Morgan Stanley); November 5, 2010 in the Northern District of Illinois (Callahan v. Discover Financial Services, Inc. and Discover Bank); December 17, 2010 in the Western District of Tennessee (Sack v. DFS Services LLC; Discover Financial Services, Inc.; and Discover Bank); January 14, 2011 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Boyce v. DFS Services LLC; Discover Financial Services Inc.; Discover Bank); February 15, 2011 in the Southern District of Florida (Triplett v. Discover Financial Services, Inc., DFS Financial Services LLC, Discover Bank and Morgan Stanley); and March 7, 2011 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Discover Financial Services, Inc., DFS Financial Services LLC, Discover Bank, Morgan Stanley et al.). On February 7, 2011, six of the ~~antitrust case against Visa~~cases (Alexander, Conroy, Walker, Callahan, Sack and ~~MasterCard, and that Morgan Stanley is entitled~~Boyce) were transferred to ~~receive~~the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois pursuant to a ~~portion of~~multi-district litigation order issued by the ~~settlement proceeds as set forth in the Special Dividend Agreement. On November 18, 2008, the Company filed its response to~~

Joint Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

~~Morgan Stanley’s lawsuit, which included counterclaims against Morgan Stanley for interference with~~These class actions challenge the Company’s ~~efforts~~marketing practices with respect to ~~resolve~~its payment protection fee product to cardmembers under various state laws and the ~~antitrust lawsuit~~Truth in Lending Act. The plaintiffs seek monetary remedies including unspecified damages and restitution, attorneys’ fees and costs, and various forms of injunctive relief including an order rescinding the payment protection fee product enrollments of all class members. The Company will seek to vigorously defend all claims asserted against ~~Visa and MasterCard and willful and material breach of~~it. The Company is not in a position at this time to assess the ~~Special Dividend Agreement, which expressly provided that the Company would have sole control over the investigation, prosecution and resolution of the antitrust lawsuit.~~

~~Subsequent~~likely outcomes or its exposure, if any, with respect to a ruling by the New York State Court, the Company estimated that the amount that was probable it would owe to Morgan Stanley was $837.7 million as of November 30, 2009. Of this amount, $808.8 million was recorded as Special dividend—Morgan Stanley in liabilities on the statement of financial condition with an offset to retained earnings and $28.9 million of interest related to delayed payment was recorded in other expense. On February 11, 2010, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with Morgan Stanley, in which each party released and discharged the other party from claims related to the sharing of proceeds from the antitrust suit against Visa and MasterCard. On the same day, the Company entered into a First Amendment to the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of June 29, 2007 (the “First Amendment”) with Morgan Stanley. The First Amendment provides that payments that Morgan Stanley receives from the Company in connection with the settlement of the antitrust litigation with Visa and MasterCard shall not exceed a total of $775 million, inclusive of any accrued and unpaid interest and fees under the agreement. In addition, on the same day, the Company paid Morgan Stanley $775 million from restricted cash held in an escrow account in complete satisfaction of its obligations under the Special Dividend Agreement.

Upon payment of the $775 million on February 11, 2010, the Company reversed the $28.9 million that had been recorded in other expense in the fourth quarter 2009 and recorded a reduction to the liability attributable to the special dividend from $808.8 million to $775 million with an offsetting increase to retained earnings.these matters.

~~15.~~13.

Fair Value Disclosures

The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate fair value. To obtain fair values, observable market prices are used if available. In some instances, observable market prices are not readily available and fair value is determined using present value or other techniques appropriate for a particular financial instrument. These techniques involve some degree of judgment and, as a result, are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following table provides the estimated fair values of financial instruments (dollars in thousands):

   August 31, 2010    November 30, 2009
   Carrying
Value    Estimated
Fair Value    Carrying
Value    Estimated
Fair Value
Financial Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
   $ 7,916,091    $ 7,916,091    $ 13,020,719    $ 13,020,719
Restricted cash—special dividend escrow
   $ —      $ —      $ 643,311    $ 643,311
Restricted cash—for securitization investors⁽¹⁾
   $ 691,698    $ 691,698    $ —      $ —
Other short-term investments
   $ 375,000    $ 375,000    $ 1,350,000    $ 1,350,000
Investment securities:

Available-for-sale⁽¹⁾
   $ 1,151,689    $ 1,151,689    $ 2,645,481    $ 2,645,481
Held-to-maturity⁽¹⁾
   $ 74,058    $ 73,029    $ 2,389,816    $ 1,953,990
Net loan receivables⁽¹⁾
   $ 46,386,943    $ 46,482,449    $ 21,867,185    $ 21,984,317
Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾
   $ —      $ —      $ 1,692,051    $ 1,692,051
Derivative financial instruments
   $ 1,370    $ 1,370    $ 1,369    $ 1,369
Financial Liabilities

Deposits
   $ 34,246,804    $ 35,404,706    $ 32,093,012    $ 33,139,823
Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors⁽¹⁾
   $ 14,869,265    $ 15,217,056    $ —      $ —
Other long-term borrowings
   $ 2,839,488    $ 3,156,018    $ 2,428,101    $ 2,524,320
Derivative financial instruments
   $ 634    $ 634    $ —      $ —

~~(1)~~

Upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009, the Company consolidated the securitization trusts. Loan receivables increased by the amount of securitized loans and long-term borrowings increased by the amount of debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors. Furthermore, applicable amounts of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities were reclassified to loan receivables, while amounts recorded as due from asset securitization were either reclassified or reversed. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.

~~Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Held at August 31, 2010~~~~. Below are descriptions of the techniques used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments on the Company’s statement of financial condition as of August 31, 2010.~~


	February 28, 2011				November 30, 2010
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,171,425	$	5,171,425	$	5,098,733	$	5,098,733
Restricted cash	$	676,074	$	676,074	$	1,363,758	$	1,363,758
Other short-term investments	$	375,000	$	375,000	$	375,000	$	375,000
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale	$	5,177,116	$	5,177,116	$	5,002,579	$	5,002,579
Held-to-maturity	$	63,765	$	59,991	$	72,816	$	70,195
Net loan receivables	$	48,629,769	$	48,930,530	$	45,532,295	$	45,835,543
Derivative financial instruments	$	10,552	$	10,552	$	4,995	$	4,995
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	34,858,994	$	35,824,165	$	34,413,383	$	35,500,526
Short-term borrowings	$	100,000	$	100,000	$	0	$	0
Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors	$	16,531,018	$	16,795,887	$	14,919,400	$	15,148,534
Other long-term borrowings	$	2,459,152	$	2,831,180	$	2,786,328	$	3,118,967
Derivative financial instruments	$	25,909	$	25,909	$	6,594	$	6,594

Cash and cash ~~equivalents~~equivalents.. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the low level of risk these assets present to the Company as well as the relatively liquid nature of these assets, particularly given their short maturities.

Restricted ~~cash~~cash.. The carrying value of restricted cash approximates fair value due to the relatively liquid nature of these assets, particularly given the short maturities of the assets in which the restricted cash is invested.

Other short-term investments.The carrying value of other short-term investments approximates fair value due to the low level of risk these assets present to the Company as well as the relatively liquid nature of these assets, particularly given their maturities of less than one year.

Available-for-sale investment securities. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale consist of credit card asset-backed securities issued by other financial institutions, U.S. Treasury and government agency securities, corporate debt securities, and, until August 2010, asset-backed commercial paper ~~notes, the~~notes. The fair value ~~estimate~~for the U.S. Treasury and government agency securities are valued using estimated fair values based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities. The fair value estimation techniques ~~of which~~for the credit card asset-backed securities issued by other financial institutions and corporate debt securities are discussed below.

Held-to-maturity investment ~~securities~~securities.. Held-to-maturity investment securities are generally valued using the estimated fair values based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities.

Net loan receivables. The Company’s loan receivables ~~include~~are comprised of credit card and installment loans, ~~to consumers and credit card~~including the private student loans ~~to businesses.~~acquired from SLC. To estimate the fair value of loan receivables, loans are

aggregated into pools of similar loan types, characteristics and expected repayment terms. The fair values of ~~the~~all loan receivables, other than PCI student loans are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using ~~a rate~~rates at which similar loans could be made under current market conditions. The fair value of the PCI student loans is deemed to approximate the carrying value at February 28, 2011 given the proximity to the fair value calculation associated with purchase accounting.

Derivative financial instruments. The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely

accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and option volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. See Note 14: Derivatives and Hedging Activities for more information.

Deposits. The carrying values of money market deposits, non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits approximate their fair values due to the liquid nature of these deposits. For time deposits for which readily available market rates do not exist, fair values are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using market rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.

Short-term borrowings. The carrying values of short-term borrowings approximate their fair value. Federal Funds purchased and repurchase agreements are short-term in nature and have maturities of less than one year.

Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization ~~investors.~~investors. Fair values of long-term borrowings owed to credit card securitization investors are determined utilizing quoted market prices of the same transactions. Fair values of long-term borrowings owed to student loan securitization investors are calculated by discounting cash flows using estimated assumptions including, among other things, maturity and market discount rates.

Other long-term ~~borrowings.~~borrowings. Fair values of other long-term borrowings are determined utilizing current observable market prices for those transactions, if available. If there are no observable market transactions, then fair values are determined by discounting cash flows of future interest accruals at market rates currently offered for borrowings with similar credit risks, ~~similar~~ remaining maturities and repricing terms.

~~Derivative financial instruments.~~The Company’s derivative activity consists of interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and option volatility.The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.

~~Fair Value of Assets Held at November 30, 2009.~~ Below are descriptions of the techniques used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments on the Company’s statements of financial condition as of November 30, 2009 which were subsequently derecognized, reclassified or eliminated in consolidation as a result of the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 on December 1, 2009.

~~Available-for-sale investment securities~~. Fair value of certain certificated subordinated interests issued by DCENT that were acquired by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company were estimated utilizing discounted cash flow analyses, where estimated contractual principal and interest cash flows were discounted at rates derived from indicative pricing observed in the most recent active market for such instruments, adjusted for changes reflective of incremental credit risk, liquidity risk, or both.

~~Held-to-maturity investment securities~~. The estimated fair values of certain certificated subordinated interests issued by DCENT and DCMT were derived utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis, where estimated contractual principal and interest cash flows were discounted at rates interpolated from recent pricing observed on similar asset classes, adjusted for incremental credit risk, liquidity risk, or both, to reflect, for example, the risk related to the lower rating on the instrument being valued than that which was observed. As a portion of these investment securities were zero coupon certificated retained interests, the aggregate carrying value, or amortized cost, significantly exceeded fair value.

~~Amounts due from asset securitization~~. Carrying values of the portion of amounts due from asset securitization that were short term in nature approximated their fair values. Fair values of the remaining assets recorded in amounts due from asset securitization reflected the present value of estimated future cash flows utilizing management’s best estimate of key assumptions with regard to credit card loan receivable performance and interest rate environment projections.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring ~~Basis.~~Basis.ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between valuations that are based on observable inputs from those based on unobservable inputs, and requires certain disclosures about those measurements. The table below presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at August 31, 2010, and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy with which each of those items is associated. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs are defined as those that utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs are those that utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active or inactive markets, quoted prices for the identical assets in an inactive market, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. The Company evaluates factors such as the frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the significance of adjustments made when considering transactions involving similar assets or liabilities to assess the relevance of those observed prices. If relevant and observable prices are available, the fair values of the related assets or liabilities would be classified as Level 2. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are those based on unobservable inputs, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability being valued. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety is classified is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The ~~Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.~~

~~Disclosures concerning assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (dollars in thousands):~~

   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)    Total
Balance at August 31, 2010

Assets

Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers
   $ —      $ 1,149,666    $ —      $ 1,149,666
U.S. Treasury securities
   1,002    —      —      1,002
U.S. government agency securities
   —      1,004    —      1,004
Equity securities
   —      —      17    17

Available-for-sale investment securities
   $ 1,002    $ 1,150,670    $ 17    $ 1,151,689

Derivative financial instruments
   $ —      $ 1,370    $ —      $ 1,370
Liabilities

Derivative financial instruments
   $ —      $ 634    $ —      $ 634
Balance at November 30, 2009

Assets

Available-for-sale investment securities
   $ 15    $ —      $ 2,645,466    $ 2,645,481
Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾
   $ —      $ —      $ 940,164    $ 940,164
Derivative financial instruments
   $ —      $ 1,369    $ —      $ 1,369

~~(1)~~

~~Balances represent only the components of amounts due from asset securitization that are marked to fair value.~~

The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its fair value calculations, evaluating the frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the significance of adjustments made when considering transactions involving similar assets or liabilities to assess the relevance of those observed prices. If relevant and observable prices are available, the fair values of the related assets or liabilities would be classified as Level 2. If relevant and observable prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the fair values of the financial instruments would be classified as Level 3. The Company may utilize both observable and unobservable inputs in determining the fair values of financial instruments classified within the Level 3 category. The ~~level to which an asset or liability is classified is based upon~~Company’s assessment of the ~~lowest level~~significance of a particular input ~~that is~~

~~significant~~ to the fair value ~~measurement. If the fair value~~measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and involves consideration of ~~an asset or liability is measured based on observable inputs as well as unobservable inputs which contributed significantly~~factors specific to ~~the determination of fair value,~~ the asset or ~~liability would be classified in Level 3 of the~~liability.

Disclosures concerning assets and liabilities measured at fair value ~~hierarchy.~~on a recurring basis are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Balance at February 28, 2011
Assets
U.S Treasury securities	$	1,807,414	$	0	$	0	$	1,807,414
U.S government agency securities		2,120,627		0		0		2,120,627
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers		0		743,475		0		743,475
Corporate debt securities		0		505,600		0		505,600

Available-for-sale investment securities	$	3,928,041	$	1,249,075	$	0	$	5,177,116
Derivative financial instruments	$	0	$	10,552	$	0	$	10,552
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments	$	0	$	25,909	$	0	$	25,909
Balance at November 30, 2010
Assets
U.S Treasury securities	$	1,574,853	$	0	$	0	$	1,574,853
U.S government agency securities		1,888,701		0		0		1,888,701
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers		0		1,031,112		0		1,031,112
Corporate debt securities		0		507,896		0		507,896
Equity securities		0		0		17		17

Available-for-sale investment securities	$	3,463,554	$	1,539,008	$	17	$	5,002,579
Derivative financial instruments	$	0	$	4,995	$	0	$	4,995
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments	$	0	$	6,594	$	0	$	6,594

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, amounts reported in credit card asset-backed securities issued by other institutions reflected senior-rated Class A securities having a par value of ~~$1,048~~$656 million and more junior-rated Class B and Class C securities with par values of $50 million and ~~$42~~$35 million, respectively. The Class A securities had a weighted-average coupon of ~~2.56%~~2.51% and a weighted-average remaining maturity of ~~10.5~~9.7 months, the Class B, ~~0.62%~~0.60% and ~~20.6~~14.6 months, respectively, and the Class C, ~~0.74%~~0.69% and ~~15.6~~11.9 months, respectively. The underlying loans for these securities are predominantly prime general-purpose credit card loan receivables. Amounts reported in corporate debt securities reflected AAA-rated corporate debt obligations issued under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) that are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) with a par value of $495 million, a weighted-average coupon of 2.42% and a weighted-average remaining maturity of 14.7 months.

The Company utilizes an external pricing source for the reported fair value ~~estimates~~ of these securities. ~~The~~Regarding the corporate debt obligations issued under TLGP, fair values estimates are derived utilizing a spread relative to an underlying benchmark curve which reflects the terms and conditions of specific instruments being valued. Regarding credit card asset-backed securities, the expected cash flow models used by the pricing service utilize observable market data to the extent available and other valuation inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker quotes, issuer spreads, bids and offers, the priority of which may vary based on availability of information. ~~We further assess~~The Company assesses the reasonableness of the price quotations received from the external pricing source by reference to indicative pricing from another independent, nationally recognized provider of capital markets information.

At November 30, 2009, the amount reported in asset-backed commercial paper notes included in available-for-sale investment securities was related to mortgage-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key U.S. LLC. At that time, the estimated fair value reflected an estimate of the market value of those assets held by the issuer, which was primarily reliant upon unobservable data as the market for mortgage-backed securities had continued to experience significant disruption. The collateral supporting these notes was liquidated during the third quarter of 2010. See Note 3 Investment Securities for further discussion of this investment.

The following tables provide changes in the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Net transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are presented using beginning of the period fair values excluding purchases and other settlements. Excluding purchases and other settlements, the Company had no significant transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the second or third quarter of 2010, the effective periods for the new disclosure requirements prescribed by ASU No. 2010-06.

Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

(dollars in thousands)

For the Three Months Ended
August 31, 2010
Balance at
May 31,
2010 Total Realized
and Unrealized
Gains (Losses) Purchases,
Sales, Other
Settlements and
Issuances, net Net Transfers
Into and/or Out
of Level 3 Balance at
August 31,
2010 Change in
unrealized
gains (losses)
related to
financial
instruments
held at
August 31,
2010
Assets

Asset-backed commercial paper notes
$ 63,732 $ 7,161 $ (70,893 ) $ —   $ —   $ —
Equity securities
17 —   —      —   17 —

Available-for-sale investment securities
$ 63,749 $ 7,161 $ (70,893 ) $ —   $ 17 $ —

For the Nine Months Ended
August 31, 2010
Balance at
November 30,
2009 Derecognition
of assets upon
adoption
of Statement
No. 167 Total Realized
and Unrealized
Gains (Losses) Purchases,
Sales, Other
Settlements and
Issuances, net Net Transfers
Into and/or Out
of Level 3 Balance at
August 31,
2010 Change in
unrealized
gains (losses)
related to
financial
instruments
held at
August 31,
2010
Assets

Certificated retained interest in DCENT
$ 2,204,969 $ (2,204,969 ) $ —   $ —      $ —      $ —   $ —
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers
381,705 —      —   —      (381,705 ) —   —
Asset-backed commercial paper notes
58,792 —      12,101 (70,893 ) —      —   —
Equity securities
—   —      —   —      17    17 —

Available-for-sale investment securities
$ 2,645,466 $ (2,204,969 ) $ 12,101 $ (70,893 ) $ (381,688 ) $ 17 —

Cash collateral accounts
$ 822,585 $ (822,585 ) $ —   $ —      $ —      $ —   $ —
Interest-only strip receivable
117,579 (117,579 ) —   —      —      —   —

Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾
$ 940,164 $ (940,164 ) $ —   $ —      $ —      $ —   $ —

For the Three Months Ended
February 28, 2011
   Balance at
November 30,
2010    Total Realized
and Unrealized
Gains (Losses)    Sales Net Transfers
Into and/
or Out
of Level 3    Balance at
February 28,
2011    Change in
unrealized
gains (losses)
related to
financial
instruments
held at
February 28,
2011
Assets

Equity securities
   $ 17    $ 144       $ (161 ) $ 0       $ 0       $ 0

Available-for-sale investment securities
   $ 17       $ 144       $ (161 ) $ 0       $ 0       $ 0


For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009	Balance at May 31, 2009		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net			Net Transfers Into and/or Out of Level 3		Balance at August 31, 2009
For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2010													Balance at November 30, 2009		Derecognition of assets upon adoption of Statement No. 167			Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net		Net Transfers Into and/ or Out of Level 3			Balance at February 28, 2010		Change in unrealized gains (losses) related to financial instruments held at February 28, 2010
Assets
Certificated retained interest in DCENT													$	2,204,969	$	(2,204,969	)	$	0		$	0	$	0		$	0	$	0
Credit card asset-backed securities of other issuers														381,705		0			0			0		(381,705	)		0		0
Asset-backed commercial paper notes														58,792		0			3,379	⁽¹⁾		0		0			62,171		0

Available-for-sale investment securities	$	1,429,723	$	40,922		$	53,066		$	—	$	1,523,711	$	2,645,466	$	(2,204,969	)	$	3,379		$	0	$	(381,705	)	$	62,171		0
Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾	$	1,053,792	$	68,880		$	(47,368	)	$	—	$	1,075,304

For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009	Balance at November 30, 2008		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net			Net Transfers Into and/or Out of Level 3		Balance at August 31, 2009
Assets
Available-for-sale investment securities	$	1,127,090	$	68,253		$	328,368		$	—	$	1,523,711
Amounts due from asset securitization⁽¹⁾	$	1,421,567	$	(122,315	)	$	(223,948	)	$	—	$	1,075,304
Cash collateral accounts													$	822,585	$	(822,585	)	$	0		$	0	$	0		$	0	$	0
Interest-only strip receivable														117,579		(117,579	)		0			0		0			0		0

Amounts due from asset securitization													$	940,164	$	(940,164	)	$	0		$	0	$	0		$	0	$	0

(1)	~~Balances represent only~~Reflects unrealized pretax gains recorded in other comprehensive income in the ~~components~~condensed consolidated statement of ~~amounts due from asset securitization that are marked to fair value.~~financial condition.

~~The following are the amounts recognized in earnings and other comprehensive income related to assets categorized as Level 3 during the respective periods (in thousands):~~

   For the Three Months Ended
August 31, For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
         2010             2009             2010             2009
Interest income—interest accretion
   $ —      $ 4,878    $ —      $ 11,213
Other income—gain (loss) on investment securities
   19,556 (7,422 ) 19,556 (8,249 )
Securitization income—net revaluation of retained interests
   —      68,880    —      (122,315 )

Amount recorded in earnings
   19,556 66,336    19,556 (119,351 )
Unrealized gains (losses) recorded in other comprehensive income, pre-tax
   (12,395 ) 43,467    (7,455 ) 65,289

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)
   $ 7,161 $ 109,803    $ 12,101 $ (54,062 )

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis.The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets include those associated with acquired businesses, including goodwill and other intangible assets. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition is applicable if one or more is determined to be impaired. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had no impairments related to these assets.

As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had not made any fair value elections with respect to any of its eligible assets and liabilities as permitted under ASC 825-10-25.

~~16.~~14.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivatives to manage its exposure to various financial risks. The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements as part of its interest rate risk management program. The Company also entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to manage the gains and losses that arise from certain foreign currency denominated receivables of one of its subsidiaries. The foreign exchange forward contracts are not designated as hedges, but provide a hedge of the volatility in earnings that arises from converting foreign denominated balance sheet items into the functional currency. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Derivatives not designated as hedges are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict requirements of hedge accounting. All derivatives are recorded in other assets at their gross positive fair values and in accrued expenses and other liabilities at their gross negative fair values.

Derivatives may give rise to counterparty credit risk. The Company enters into derivative transactions with established dealers that meet minimum credit criteria established by the Company. All counterparties must be pre-approved prior to engaging in any transaction with the Company. Counterparties are monitored on a periodic basis by the Company to ensure compliance with the Company’s risk policies and limits.

Derivatives ~~Designated~~designated as Hedges

Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges.

Cash Flow Hedges.The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates related to future cash flows resulting from credit card loan receivables. These transactions are hedged for a

maximum period of three years. The derivatives are designated as a hedge of the risk of overall changes in cash flows on the Company’s portfolios of prime-based interest receipts and qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 815,Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”).

The effective portion of the change in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is recorded in other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted cash flows affect earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative, if any, is recognized directly in earnings. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives at ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 will be reclassified to interest income as interest payments are received on certain of its floating rate credit card loan receivables. During the next 12 months, the Company estimates it will reclassify to earnings ~~$6.1~~$8.6 million of pretax gains ~~pre-tax,~~ related to its derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.

Fair Value Hedges.The Company is exposed to changes in fair value of certain of its fixed rate debt obligations due to changes in interest rates. ~~As of August 31, 2010, the Company had no fair value hedges.~~ During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~August 31, 2009,~~February 28, 2011, the Company used an interest rate ~~swaps from time to time~~swap to manage its exposure to changes in fair value of ~~these obligations~~fixed rate senior notes attributable to changes in LIBOR, a benchmark interest rate as defined by ASC 815. ~~These~~The interest rate ~~swaps involved~~swap involves the receipt of a fixed rate ~~amounts~~amount from ~~counterparties~~a counterparty in exchange for the Company making payments of a variable rate ~~amounts~~amount over the life of the ~~agreements~~agreement without exchange of the underlying notional amount. ~~Most of these agreements were designated to hedge interest-bearing deposits and qualify~~This interest rate swap qualifies as a fair value ~~hedges~~hedge in accordance with ASC 815. Changes in both the fair value of the ~~derivatives~~derivative and the hedged ~~interest-bearing deposits~~fixed rate senior note relating to the risk being hedged were recorded in interest expense and provided substantial offset to one another. Ineffectiveness related to ~~these~~this fair value ~~hedges, if any,~~hedge was recorded in interest expense. The basis difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the fixed rate debt as of the inception of the hedging relationship is amortized and recorded in interest expense.

Derivatives not ~~Designated~~designated as Hedges

Foreign Exchange Forward ~~Contracts.~~Contracts. The Company has derivatives that are economic hedges and are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to

manage foreign currency risk. Foreign exchange forward contracts involve the purchase or sale of a designated currency at an agreed upon rate for settlement on a specified date. Changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded in other income.

Interest Rate ~~Swaps.~~Swaps. The Company also may have from time to time interest rate swap agreements that are not designated as hedges. As part of its acquisition of SLC, the Company also acquired an interest rate swap related to the securitized debt assumed in the SLC transaction. Such agreements are not speculative and are also used to manage interest rate risk but are not designated for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded in other income.

The following table summarizes the fair value (including accrued interest) and related outstanding notional amounts of derivative instruments, as well as the location they are reported in the statement of financial condition as of ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 and November 30, ~~2009 (dollars~~2010. See Note 13: Fair Value Disclosures for a description of the valuation methodologies of derivatives. (Dollars in thousands):


	August 31, 2010							November 30, 2009						February 28, 2011								November 30, 2010
				Balance Sheet Location						Balance Sheet Location								Balance Sheet Location						Balance Sheet Location
	Notional Amount		Number of Transactions	Other Assets (At Fair Value)		Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities (At Fair Value)		Notional Amount		Other Assets (At Fair Value)		Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities (At Fair Value)		Notional Amount		Number of Transactions		Other Assets (At Fair Value)		Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities (At Fair Value)		Notional Amount		Other Assets (At Fair Value)		Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities (At Fair Value)
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Interest rate swaps—Cash flow hedge	$	1,250,000	5	$	1,327	$	634	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swaps—Fair value hedge	$	—	—	$	—	$	—	$	16,048	$	400	$	—
Interest rate swaps—Cash Flow hedge														$	2,000,000		8	$	0	$	9,117	$	2,000,000	$	4,989	$	0
Interest rate swaps—Fair Value hedge														$	400,000		1	$	0	$	16,746	$	400,000	$	0	$	6,587
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Foreign exchange forward contracts⁽¹⁾	$	7,643	2	$	43	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,246		2	$	0	$	46	$	7,800	$	6	$	7
Interest rate swaps	$	—	—	$	—	$	—	$	46,952	$	969	$	—
Interest rate swap														$	1,522,271		1	$	10,552	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

(1)	The foreign exchange forward contracts have notional amounts of EUR 4 million and GBP ~~1.7~~1.675 million as of ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010.

The following table summarizes the impact of the derivative instruments on income, as well as the location they are reported in the ~~financial~~condensed consolidated statements of income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~ (dollars in thousands):

For the three months ended
August 31 For the nine months ended
August 31,
Location     2010         2009         2010         2009
Derivatives designated as hedges:

Interest Rate Swaps-Cash Flow Hedges:

Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income after amounts reclassified into earnings, pre-tax
Other
Comprehensive
Income $ 251    $ —   $ 251 $ —

Total gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income
$ 251    —   $ 251 —

Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings
Interest Income $ 442    $ —   $ 442 $ —
Net hedge ineffectiveness
Other Income —      —   —   —
Gain (loss) excluded from assessment of hedge effectiveness
Interest Income —      —   —   —
Interest Rate Swaps-Fair Value Hedges:

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps⁽¹⁾
Interest Expense —      167 44 7,745
Gain (loss) on hedged item⁽²⁾
Interest Expense —      2,907 —   8,425

Total gains (losses) recognized in income
$ 442    $ 3,074 $ 486 $ 16,170

Derivatives not designated as hedges:

Gain (loss) on forward contract
Other Income $ (301 ) $ —   $ 458 $ —
Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps
Other Income —      166 6 1,767

Total gains (losses) on derivatives not designated as hedges recognized in income
$ (301 ) $ 166 $ 464 $ 1,767

~~(1)~~

~~For the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009, the gain (loss) on derivative includes ineffectiveness of $105 thousand and $1.2 million respectively.~~

~~(2)~~

~~For the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009, the gain (loss) on hedged item includes ineffectiveness of $36 thousand and $(2.2) million respectively.~~


			For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	Location		2011			2010
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Interest Rate Swaps—Cash Flow Hedges:
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income after amounts reclassified into earnings, pre-tax		Other Comprehensive Income	$	(14,086	)	$	0

Total gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income			$	(14,086	)	$	0

Amount reclassified from other comprehensive income into income		Interest Income	$	1,851		$	0
Interest Rate Swaps—Fair Value Hedges:
Interest expense—ineffectiveness				(12,915	)		0
Interest expense—other				1,649			(52	)

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		Interest Expense		(11,266	)		(52	)
Interest expense—ineffectiveness				13,723			0
Interest expense—other				(1,616	)		25

Gain (loss) on hedged Item		Interest Expense		12,107			25

Total gains (losses) recognized in income			$	2,692		$	(27	)

Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Gain (loss) on forward contracts		Other Income	$	(451	)	$	103
Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		Other Income		(688	)		5

Total gains (losses) on derivatives not designated as hedges recognized in income			$	(1,139	)	$	108

Collateral Requirements and Credit-Risk Related Contingency Features

For its interest rate swaps, the Company has master netting arrangements and minimum collateral posting thresholds with its counterparties. Collateral is required by either the Company or the counterparty depending on the net fair value position of all interest rate swaps held with that counterparty. The Company may also be required to post collateral with a counterparty depending on the credit rating it or Discover Bank receives from specified major credit rating agencies. Collateral amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition are based on the net collateral receivable or payable position for each counterparty. Collateral receivable or payable amounts are not offset against the fair value of the interest rate swap, but are recorded separately in other assets or deposits.

As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the Company had a right to reclaim $27.5 million of cash collateral that had been posted as a result of the fair value position of the interest rate swaps. The Company also had a right to reclaim $4.0 million of cash collateral that had been posted because the credit rating of the Company did not meet specified thresholds. At February 28, 2011, Discover Bank’s credit rating met specified thresholds set by its counterparties. However, if Discover Bank’s credit rating is reduced to below investment grade, the Company would be required to post additional collateral, which, as of February 28, 2011, would have been $31.3 million.

As of February 28, 2011, the Company had interest rate swaps in a net liability position with ~~one~~all of its counterparties, the fair value of which ~~was $3 thousand,~~totaled $25.9 million, inclusive of accrued interest. ~~As of August 31, 2010, the Company had a right to reclaim cash collateral of $0.6 million based on these agreements and had no obligation to return cash collateral.~~ If the Company had breached any provisions of the derivative agreements, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination ~~value,~~values, which ~~was $3 thousand~~totaled $25.9 million at ~~August 31, 2010.~~February 28, 2011.

The Company also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.

The Company also has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain provisions that require Discover Bank’s debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from specified major credit rating agencies. If Discover Bank’s credit rating is reduced to below investment grade, the Company would be required to post additional collateral, which, as of August 31, 2010, would have been $20 million.

~~17.~~15.

Segment Disclosures

The Company’s business activities are managed in two segments: Direct Banking and Payment Services.

~~Direct Banking.~~ The Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses on the Discover Network and other consumer products and services, including personal loans, student loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary.

~~Payment Services.~~The Payment Services segment includes PULSE, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network; Diners Club, a global payments network; and the Company’s third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties.
•
Direct Banking. The Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individual and small businesses and other consumer products and services, including personal loans, student loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through the Company’s Discover Bank subsidiary. The majority of the Direct Banking revenues relate to interest income earned on each of its loan products. Additionally, the Company’s credit card products contribute to substantially all of the Company’s revenues related to discount and interchange, fee products and loan fee income.

•

Payment Services.The Payment Services segment includes PULSE, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network; Diners Club, a global payments network; and the Company’s third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties. The majority of the Payment Services revenues relate to transaction processing revenue from PULSE and royalty and licensee revenue (included in other income) from Diners Club.

The business segment reporting provided to and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker is prepared using the following principles and allocation conventions:

Prior to adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167, segment information was presented on a managed basis because management considered the performance of the entire managed loan portfolio in managing the business. A managed basis presentation, which is a non-GAAP presentation, involved reporting securitized loans with the Company’s owned loans and reporting the earnings on securitized loans in the same manner as the owned loans instead of as securitization income. Although similar, a managed basis presentation is not the same as presenting a full consolidation of the trusts, and therefore, certain information may not be comparable between current and prior periods, particularly related to net interest income, provision for loan losses and other income. Subsequent to the consolidation of securitized assets and liabilities in connection with the adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167, there is no distinction between securitized and non-securitized assets on a GAAP basis. See Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle for more information.

Other accounting policies applied to the operating segments are consistent with the accounting policies described in Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009.

Corporate overhead is not allocated between segments; all corporate overhead is included in the Direct Banking segment.

Through its operation of the Discover Network, the Direct Banking segment incurs fixed marketing, servicing and infrastructure costs that are not specifically allocated among the operating segments.

The assets of the Company are not allocated among the operating segments in the information reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker.

The revenues of each segment are derived from external sources. The segments do not earn revenue from intercompany sources.

Income taxes are not specifically allocated among the operating segments in the information reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker.

The following ~~tables present~~table presents segment data ~~on a GAAP basis~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and 2010 ~~and on a managed basis with a reconciliation to a GAAP presentation for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009~~ (dollars in thousands):

   GAAP Basis
For the Three Months Ended
   Direct
Banking    Payment
Services Total
August 31, 2010

Interest income
   $ 1,535,934    $ 5    $ 1,535,939
Interest expense
   389,059    78    389,137

Net interest income
   1,146,875    (73 ) 1,146,802
Provision for loan losses
   712,565    —      712,565
Other income
   495,771    68,373    564,144
Other expense
   534,782    31,456    566,238

Income before income tax expense
   $ 395,299    $ 36,844    $ 432,143

   Managed Basis    Securitization
Adjustment⁽¹⁾ GAAP
Basis
   Direct
Banking    Payment
Services Total    Total
August 31, 2009

Interest income
   $ 1,663,886    $ 195    $ 1,664,081    $ (830,864 ) $ 833,217
Interest expense
   392,592    50    392,642    (88,241 ) 304,401

Net interest income
   1,271,294    145    1,271,439    (742,623 ) 528,816
Provision for loan losses
   924,427    —      924,427    (543,428 ) 380,999
Other income⁽²⁾
   1,055,529    61,236    1,116,765    199,195    1,315,960
Other expense
   489,596    34,242    523,838    —      523,838

Income before income tax expense
   $ 912,800    $ 27,139    $ 939,939    $ —      $ 939,939

   GAAP Basis
For the Nine Months Ended
   Direct
Banking    Payment
Services Total
August 31, 2010

Interest income
   $ 4,646,856    $ 15    $ 4,646,871
Interest expense
   1,207,322    160    1,207,482

Net interest income
   3,439,534    (145 ) 3,439,389
Provision for loan losses
   2,824,035    —      2,824,035
Other income
   1,423,823    199,041    1,622,864
Other expense
   1,465,749    88,841    1,554,590

Income before income tax expense
   $ 573,573    $ 110,055    $ 683,628

   Managed Basis    Securitization
Adjustment⁽¹⁾ GAAP
Basis
   Direct
Banking    Payment
Services Total    Total
August 31, 2009

Interest income
   $ 4,874,362    $ 1,020    $ 4,875,382    $ (2,368,388 ) $ 2,506,994
Interest expense
   1,244,932    190    1,245,122    (307,996 ) 937,126

Net interest income
   3,629,430    830    3,630,260    (2,060,392 ) 1,569,868
Provision for loan losses
   3,369,332    —      3,369,332    (1,406,659 ) 1,962,673
Other income⁽²⁾
   2,753,382    179,921    2,933,303    653,733    3,587,036
Other expense
   1,545,611    97,978    1,643,589    —      1,643,589

Income before income tax expense
   $ 1,467,869    $ 82,773    $ 1,550,642    $ —      $ 1,550,642

~~(1)~~

The Securitization Adjustment column presents the effect of loan securitizations by recharacterizing as securitization income the portions of the following items that relate to the securitized loans: interest income, interest expense, provision for loan losses, discount and interchange revenue and loan fee revenues. Securitization income is reported in other income.

~~(2)~~

The three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 includes $472 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, of income related to the Visa and MasterCard antitrust litigation settlement, which is included in the Direct Banking segment.


For the Three Months Ended	Direct Banking			Payment Services			Total
February 28, 2011
Interest income
Credit card	$	1,417,116		$	0		$	1,417,116
Private student loans		60,398			0			60,398
Personal loans		56,055			0			56,055
Other		19,388			7			19,388

Total interest income		1,552,957			7			1,552,964
Interest expense		382,657			71			382,728

Net interest income		1,170,300			(64	)		1,170,236
Provision for loan losses		417,709			0			417,709
Other income		486,063			76,561			562,624
Other expense		561,752			33,396			595,148

Income before income tax expense	$	676,902		$	43,101		$	720,003

February 28, 2010
Interest income
Credit card	$	1,491,887		$	0		$	1,491,887
Private student loans		8,909			0			8,909
Personal loans		39,631			0			39,631
Other		18,720			3			18,723

Total interest income		1,559,147			3			1,559,150
Interest expense		413,686			38			413,724

Net interest income		1,145,461			(35	)		1,145,426
Provision for loan losses		1,387,206			0			1,387,206
Other income		480,341			65,535			545,876
Other expense		446,261			28,543			474,804

Income (loss) before income tax expense	$	(207,665	)	$	36,957		$	(170,708	)

~~18.~~16.

Subsequent Events

~~Subsequent to August 31, 2010,~~Cash Dividend. On March 22, 2011, the Company ~~had an increase in its investment securities resulting from~~declared a cash dividend of $0.06 per share, payable on April 21, 2011, to stockholders of record at the ~~purchase~~close of ~~approximately $4 billion of U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities.~~business on April 7, 2011.

Long-term Borrowings.On September 23, 2010, the Company completed the sale of $1.5 billion of federal student loans to the U.S. Department of Education, the majority of which were classified as held for sale as of August 31, 2010. The loans were sold pursuant to a Master Loan Sale Agreement for the 2009-10 Loan Purchase Program under the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (“ECASLA”). The impact of the sale on net income was not material.

~~On September 20, 2010,~~March 8, 2011, DCENT, one of the Company’s securitization trusts, issued ~~$600 million~~$1.0 billion of public ~~asset-backed securities. On September 23, 2010, DCENT issued $200 million of~~credit card asset-backed securities ~~through its private conduit providers. Related to these issuances,~~at an ~~additional $111.8 million~~interest rate of ~~subordinated interests were issued~~one-month LIBOR plus 35 basis points and ~~retained by~~ a ~~wholly-owned subsidiary~~maturity of ~~the Company.~~

On September 17, 2010, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Discover Bank and The Student Loan Corporation (“SLC”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Discover Bank agreed to acquire SLC for $600 million, or $30 per share (the “Merger Consideration”), subject to an expected purchase price closing adjustment in the form of a cash payment of approximately $150 million by Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), 80% owner of SLC, to Discover Bank. The acquisition will occurthree years.

through the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank with and into SLC, with SLC surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank. Immediately prior to the merger, SLC is expected to sell $28 billion of assets to SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae) and $8.7 billion of assets to Citibank. The transaction is expected to close after the end of the fiscal year but before the end of the calendar year, subject to closing conditions including, among others, the approval of the Merger Agreement by SLC’s stockholders and the closing of SLC’s asset sale transactions.

In the transaction, Discover Bank will acquire: (i) the beneficial interests in securitization trusts formed for the purpose of holding the private student loans associated with public securitization transactions issued out of the SLC Private Student Loan Trust 2006-A, and private securitization transactions issued out of the SLC Private Student Loan Trusts 2010-A and 2010-B (collectively, the “Loans”), which Loans had an estimated book value at June 30, 2010 of approximately $4.2 billion, (ii) the cash reserves held in the securitization trusts associated with the Loans and (iii) certain fixed, tangible and intangible assets including, without limitation, SLC’s student loan origination business. The Company estimates that approximately 70% of the Loans are covered by insurance, and approximately 65% of the Loans are in repayment. Discover Bank will also effectively assume securitization debt of approximately $3.4 billion associated with the Loans.

Concurrently with the entry into the Merger Agreement, Discover Bank also entered into a Purchase Price Adjustment Agreement and an Indemnification Agreement with Citibank. Under the Purchase Price Adjustment Agreement, Citibank has agreed to pay Discover Bank the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Merger Consideration exceeds the closing purchase price of the securitization trust certificates, plus the absolute value of all reimbursable liabilities, less all cash or cash equivalents reflected on the closing balance sheet (excluding any cash and cash equivalents taken into account in determining the closing purchase price of the securitization trust certificates). If the aggregate Merger Consideration is less than such amount, Discover Bank would make a payment to Citibank. The Company expects that Citibank will be required to make a purchase price closing adjustment in the form of a cash payment to Discover Bank in the amount of approximately $150 million. Under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, CitiBank has agreed to indemnify Discover Bank for liabilities and losses arising from and relating to (i) SLC’s asset sales to Sallie Mae and Citibank, (ii) failure of the issuers of the insurance policies covering the Loans to perform their obligations, and (iii) certain other events.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements, which speak to our expected business and financial performance, among other matters, contain words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “aim,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “likely,” and similar expressions. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report, and there is no undertaking to update or revise them as more information becomes available.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: changes in economic variables, such as the availability of consumer credit, the housing market, energy costs, the number and size of personal bankruptcy filings, the rate of unemployment and the levels of consumer confidence and consumer debt, and investor sentiment; the impact of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory and legal actions, including new laws and rules and rules related to financial regulatory reform, new laws and rules limiting or modifying certain credit card practices, new laws and rules affecting securitizations, funding and liquidity, ~~new laws and rules related to financial regulatory reform,~~ and bank holding company regulations and supervisory guidance; ~~the restrictions on our operations resulting from financing transactions;~~ the actions and initiatives of current and potential competitors; our ability to successfully achieve card acceptance across our networks and maintain relationships with network participants; our ability to manage our credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and strategic risk; the availability and cost of funding and capital; access to deposit, securitization, equity, debt and credit markets; the impact of rating agency actions; the level and volatility of equity prices, commodity prices and interest rates, currency values, investments, other market fluctuations and other market indices; losses in our investment portfolio; restrictions on our operations resulting from financing transactions; our ability to increase or sustain Discover card usage or attract new customers; our ability to attract new merchants and maintain relationships with current merchants; the effect of political, economic and market conditions, geopolitical events and unforeseen or catastrophic events; fraudulent activities or material security breaches of key systems; our ability to introduce new products and services; our ability to sustain our investment in new technology and manage our relationships with third-party vendors; our ability to collect amounts for disputed transactions from merchants and merchant acquirers; our ability to attract and retain employees; our ability to protect our reputation and our intellectual property; difficulty obtaining regulatory approval for, financing, transitioning, integrating or ~~integrating~~managing the expenses of acquisitions of or investments in new businesses, products or technologies; and new lawsuits, investigations or similar matters or unanticipated developments related to current matters. ~~In addition, we~~We routinely evaluate and may pursue acquisitions of or investments in businesses, products, technologies, loan portfolios or deposits, which may involve payment in cash or our debt or equity ~~securities, and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.~~securities.

Additional factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those described below can be found in this section in this quarterly report and in “Risk ~~Factors”~~Factors,” “Business—Competition,” “Business—Supervision and Regulation” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, ~~2009 and in “Risk Factors” in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31,~~ 2010, ~~which were~~ filed with the SEC and ~~are~~ available at the SEC’s internet site (http://www.sec.gov).

Introduction and Overview

Discover Financial Services is a ~~leading credit card issuer in the United States~~direct banking and ~~an electronic~~ payment services company. Through our Discover Bank subsidiary, we offer our customers credit cards, ~~other consumer~~student loans, personal loans and deposit products. Through our DFS Services LLC subsidiary and its subsidiaries, we operate the Discover Network, the PULSE Network (“PULSE”) and Diners Club International (“Diners Club”).

The Discover Network ~~provides credit~~is a payment card transaction processing network for Discover card-branded and third-party issued credit, debit and prepaid cards. PULSE operates an electronic funds transfer network, providing financial institutions issuing debit

cards on the PULSE Network with access to ATMs domestically and internationally, as well as point of sale terminals at retail locations throughout the U.S. for debit card transactions. Diners Club is a global payments network ~~that grants rights to~~of licensees, which are generally financial institutions, tothat issue Diners Club branded credit cards and/or to provide card acceptance services. ~~Our Diners Club business also offers transaction processing and marketing services to licensees globally.~~ Our fiscal year ends on November 30 of each year.

Our primary revenues consist of interest income earned on loan receivables and fees earned from customers, merchants and issuers. The primary expenses required to operate our business include funding costs (interest expense), loan loss provisions, customer rewards, and expenses incurred to grow, manage and service our loan receivables and networks. Our business activities are funded primarily through the raising of consumer deposits, securitization of loan receivables and the issuance of both secured and unsecured debt.

~~Change in Accounting Principle Related to Off-Balance Sheet Securitizations~~

Beginning with the first quarter 2010, we have included the trusts used in our securitization activities in our consolidated financial results in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166,~~Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140~~~~(“Statement No. 166”) (codified under the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Section 860,~~~~Transfers~~First Quarter 2011 Highlights and ~~Servicing~~~~) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,~~~~Amendments to FASB Interpretations No. 46(R)~~~~(“Statement No. 167”) (codified under ASC Section 810,~~~~Consolidation~~~~), which were effective for us at the beginning of our current fiscal year, December 1, 2009.~~

Under Statement No. 166, the trusts used in our securitization transactions are no longer exempt from consolidation. Statement No. 167 prescribes an ongoing assessment of our involvement in the activities of the trusts and our rights or obligations to receive benefits or absorb losses of the trusts that could be potentially significant in order to determine whether those entities will be required to be consolidated on our financial statements. Based on our assessment, we concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of the Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”) (the “trusts”) and accordingly, we began consolidating the trusts on December 1, 2009. Using the carrying amounts of the trust assets and liabilities as prescribed by Statement No. 167, we recorded a $21.1 billion increase in total assets, a $22.4 billion increase in total liabilities and a $1.3 billion decrease in stockholders’ equity (comprised of a $1.4 billion decrease in retained earnings offset by an increase of $0.1 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income). The significant adjustments to our statement of financial condition upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 are outlined below:

~~Consolidation of $22.3 billion of securitized loan receivables and the related debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors;~~

~~Reclassification of $4.6 billion of certificated retained interests classified as investment securities to loan receivables;~~

~~Recording of a $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses, not previously required under GAAP, for the newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables;~~

Derecognition of the remaining $0.1 billion value of the interest-only strip receivable, net of tax, recorded in amounts due from asset securitization and reclassification of the remaining $1.6 billion of amounts due from asset securitization to restricted cash, loan receivables and other assets; and

~~Recording of net deferred tax assets of $0.8 billion, largely related to establishing an allowance for loan losses on the newly consolidated and reclassified credit card loan receivables.~~

Beginning with the first quarter 2010, our results of operations no longer reflect securitization income, but instead report interest income, net charge-offs and certain other income associated with all securitized loan receivables and interest expense associated with debt issued from the trusts to third-party investors in the same line items in our results of operations as non-securitized credit card loan receivables and corporate debt. Additionally, we no longer record initial gains on new securitization activity since securitized credit card loans

no longer receive sale accounting treatment. Also, there are no gains or losses on the revaluation of the interest-only strip receivable as that asset is not recognizable in a transaction accounted for as a secured borrowing. Because our securitization transactions are being accounted for under the new accounting rules as secured borrowings rather than asset sales, the cash flows from these transactions are presented as cash flows from financing activities rather than as cash flows from operating or investing activities. Notwithstanding this accounting treatment, our securitizations are structured to legally isolate the receivables from Discover Bank, and we would not expect to be able to access the assets of our securitization trusts, even in insolvency, receivership or conservatorship proceedings. We do, however, continue to have the rights associated with our retained interests in the assets of these trusts.

~~Reconciliations of GAAP to As Adjusted Data~~

We did not retrospectively adopt Statements No. 166 and 167 and, therefore, the condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this quarterly report as of and for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010 reflect the new accounting requirements, but the historical statement of financial condition as of November 30, 2009 and statement of income and statement of cash flows for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 continue to reflect the accounting applicable prior to the adoption of the new accounting requirements.

To enable the reader to better understand our financial information by reflecting period-over-period data on a consistent basis, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presents our financial information as of and for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010 as compared to adjusted results of operations data for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 and adjusted credit card loan receivables data as of November 30, 2009. Management reviews the as adjusted financial information in its decision-making and in evaluating the business. Therefore, management believes the adjusted financial information is useful to investors as it aligns with management’s view of the business. The as adjusted amounts:

~~show how our financial data would have been presented if the trusts used in our securitization activities were consolidated into our financial statements for such historical periods; and~~

~~remove the impact of income received in connection with the settlement of our antitrust litigation with Visa and MasterCard for such historical periods.~~

The impacts of Statements No. 166 and 167 on our earnings summary, detail of other income and Direct Banking segment information are reflected in two steps in the reconciliation of GAAP to as adjusted data in the tables below. First, we made securitization adjustments to reverse the effect of loan securitization by recharacterizing securitization income to report interest income, expense, provision for loan losses, discount and interchange revenue and loan fee income in the same line items as non-securitized loans. These adjustments result in a “managed basis” presentation, which we have historically included in our quarterly and annual reports to reflect the way in which our senior management evaluated our business performance and allocated resources.

~~Then, additional adjustments were made to reflect results as if the trusts used in our securitization activities had been fully consolidated in our historical results. These adjustments include:~~

~~Elimination of interest income and interest expense related to certificated retained interests classified as investment securities and associated intercompany debt;~~

~~An adjustment to the provision for loan losses for the change in securitized loan receivables;~~

~~Elimination of the revaluation gains or losses associated with the interest-only strip receivable, which was derecognized upon adoption; and~~

~~An adjustment to reflect the income tax effects related to these adjustments.~~

The impacts of Statements No. 166 and 167 on our effective tax rate, loan receivables and average balance sheet information are reflected in one step, rather than two, in the reconciliation of GAAP to as adjusted data in the tables below as there is no meaningful difference between such information on a historical managed basis as compared to an as adjusted basis.

~~Earnings Summary and Reconciliation~~

   For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
   As
Reported Securitization
Adjustments Managed    Additional
Adjustments As Adjusted
   (dollars in thousands)
Interest income
   $ 833,217    $ 830,864    $ 1,664,081    $ (3,294 )^(A) $ 1,660,787
Interest expense
   304,401    88,241    392,642    (10,404 )^(B) 382,238

Net interest income
   528,816    742,623    1,271,439    7,110    1,278,549
Provision for loan losses
   380,999    543,428    924,427    160,782 ^(C) 1,085,209

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
   147,817    199,195    347,012    (153,672 ) 193,340
Antitrust litigation settlement
   472,167    —      472,167    (472,167 )^(D) —
Other income
   843,793    (199,195 ) 644,598    (68,881 )^(E) 575,717

Total other income
   1,315,960    (199,195 ) 1,116,765    (541,048 ) 575,717
Total other expense
   523,838    —      523,838    —      523,838

Income (loss) before income tax expense
   939,939    —      939,939    (694,720 ) 245,219
Income tax expense (benefit)
   362,485    —      362,485    (267,830 )^(F) 94,655

Net income (loss)
   $ 577,454    $ —      $ 577,454    $ (426,890 ) $ 150,564

   For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
   As
Reported Securitization
Adjustments Managed    Additional
Adjustments As Adjusted
   (dollars in thousands)
Interest income
   $ 2,506,994    $ 2,368,388    $ 4,875,382    $ (16,672 )^(A) $ 4,858,710
Interest expense
   937,126    307,996    1,245,122    (32,783 )^(B) 1,212,339

Net interest income
   1,569,868    2,060,392    3,630,260    16,111    3,646,371
Provision for loan losses
   1,962,673    1,406,659    3,369,332    495,437 ^(C) 3,864,769

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
   (392,805 ) 653,733    260,928    (479,326 ) (218,398 )
Antitrust litigation settlement
   1,419,783    —      1,419,783    (1,419,783 )^(D) —
Other income
   2,167,253    (653,733 ) 1,513,520    122,315 ^(E) 1,635,835

Total other income
   3,587,036    (653,733 ) 2,933,303    (1,297,468 ) 1,635,835
Total other expense
   1,643,589    —      1,643,589    —      1,643,589

Income (loss) before income tax expense
   1,550,642    —      1,550,642    (1,776,794 ) (226,152 )
Income tax expense (benefit)
   626,994    —      626,994    (675,082 )^(F) (48,088 )

Net income (loss)
   $ 923,648    $ —      $ 923,648    $ (1,101,712 ) $ (178,064 )

~~(A)~~

Elimination of interest income on certificated retained interests previously classified as investment securities and balance transfer fee income previously included in gain/loss on interest-only strip asset.

~~(B)~~

~~Elimination of interest expense on certificated retained interests previously classified as investment securities and an interest expense adjustment related to the discount on securitized borrowings.~~

~~(C)~~

~~Provision for loan loss on the period to period change in securitized loans.~~

~~(D)~~

~~Exclusion of settlement proceeds related to the Visa and MasterCard antitrust litigation.~~

~~(E)~~

~~Elimination of gain/loss related to revaluation of interest-only strip receivable and cash collateral accounts.~~

~~(F)~~

~~Estimated income tax benefit on the pretax loss related to Statement No. 167 adjustments and exclusion of taxes on the Visa/MasterCard antitrust litigation settlement.~~

~~Other Income and Reconciliation~~

   For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
   As
Reported Securitization
Adjustments Managed Additional
Adjustments As Adjusted
   (dollars in thousands)
Securitization income
   $ 567,288    $ (567,288 ) $ —      $ —      $ —
Discount and interchange revenue
   51,641    207,883    259,524    —      259,524
Fee products
   78,875    26,524    105,399    —      105,399
Loan fee income
   75,528    64,805    140,333    —      140,333
Transaction processing revenue
   31,839    —      31,839    —      31,839
Merchant fees
   10,716    —      10,716    —      10,716
Loss on investment securities
   (7,422 ) —      (7,422 ) —      (7,422 )
Antitrust litigation settlement
   472,167    —      472,167    (472,167 )^(A) —
Other income
   35,328    68,881    104,209    (68,881 )^(B) 35,328

Total other income
   $ 1,315,960    $ (199,195 ) $ 1,116,765    $ (541,048 ) $ 575,717

   For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
   As
Reported Securitization
Adjustments Managed Additional
Adjustments As Adjusted
   (dollars in thousands)
Securitization income
   $ 1,310,435    $ (1,310,435 ) $ —      $ —      $ —
Discount and interchange revenue
   208,802    528,584    737,386    —      737,386
Fee products
   228,899    76,802    305,701    —      305,701
Loan fee income
   195,843    173,631    369,474    —      369,474
Transaction processing revenue
   93,309    —      93,309    —      93,309
Merchant fees
   35,289    —      35,289    —      35,289
Loss on investment securities
   (9,239 ) —      (9,239 ) —      (9,239 )
Antitrust litigation settlement
   1,419,783    —      1,419,783    (1,419,783 )^(A) —
Other income
   103,915    (122,315 ) (18,400 ) 122,315 ^(B) 103,915

Total other income
   $ 3,587,036    $ (653,733 ) $ 2,933,303    $ (1,297,468 ) $ 1,635,835

~~(A)~~

~~Exclusion of settlement proceeds related to the Visa and MasterCard antitrust litigation.~~

~~(B)~~

~~Elimination of gain/loss related to revaluation of interest-only strip receivable and cash collateral accounts.~~

~~Effective Tax Rate and Reconciliation~~

   For the Three
Months Ended
August 31,
2009 For the Nine
Months Ended
August 31,
2009
GAAP
   38.6 % 40.4 %
Adjustments
   —      (19.1 )^(A)

As Adjusted
   38.6 % 21.3 %

~~(A)~~

~~See “—Income Tax Expense” for discussion.~~

~~Direct Banking Segment Summary and Reconciliation~~

   For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
   As
Reported    Securitization
Adjustments Managed    Additional
Adjustments As Adjusted
   (dollars in thousands)
Interest income
   $ 833,022    $ 830,864    $ 1,663,886    $ (3,294 )^(A) $ 1,660,592
Interest expense
   304,351    88,241    392,592    (10,404 )^(B) 382,188

Net interest income
   528,671    742,623    1,271,294    7,110    1,278,404
Provision for loan losses
   380,999    543,428    924,427    160,782 ^(C) 1,085,209
Other income
   1,254,724    (199,195 ) 1,055,529    (541,048 )^(D) 514,481
Other expense
   489,596    —      489,596    —      489,596

Income (loss) before income tax expense
   $ 912,800    $ —      $ 912,800    $ (694,720 )^(E) $ 218,080

   For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
   As
Reported    Securitization
Adjustments Managed    Additional
Adjustments As Adjusted
   (dollars in thousands)
Interest income
   $ 2,505,974    $ 2,368,388    $ 4,874,362    $ (16,672 )^(A) $ 4,857,690
Interest expense
   936,936    307,996    1,244,932    (32,783 )^(B) 1,212,149

Net interest income
   1,569,038    2,060,392    3,629,430    16,111    3,645,541
Provision for loan losses
   1,962,673    1,406,659    3,369,332    495,437 ^(C) 3,864,769
Other income
   3,407,115    (653,733 ) 2,753,382    (1,297,468 )^(D) 1,455,914
Other expense
   1,545,611    —      1,545,611    —      1,545,611

Income (loss) before income tax expense
   $ 1,467,869    $ —      $ 1,467,869    $ (1,776,794 )^(E) $ (308,925 )

~~(A)~~

~~(B)~~

~~(C)~~

~~Provision for loan loss on the period-to-period change in securitized loans.~~

~~(D)~~

~~Exclusion of settlement proceeds related to Visa/MasterCard antitrust litigation and elimination of gain/loss related to revaluation of interest-only strip receivable and cash collateral accounts.~~

~~(E)~~

~~Estimated income tax on the pretax loss related to Statement No. 167 adjustments and exclusion of taxes on the Visa/MasterCard antitrust litigation settlement.~~

~~Loan Receivables Data and Reconciliation~~

   As of and for the Three
Months Ended
August 31, 2009 As of and for the Nine
Months Ended
August 31, 2009
   Total Loan
Receivables Total Credit
Card Loans Total Loan
Receivables Total Credit
Card Loans
   (dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands)
Loan receivables

GAAP
   $ 25,489,809    $ 22,721,603    $ 25,489,809    $ 22,721,603
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   25,406,787    25,406,787    25,406,787    25,406,787

As Adjusted
   $ 50,896,596    $ 48,128,390    $ 50,896,596    $ 48,128,390

Allowance for loan losses (beginning of period)

GAAP
   $ 1,986,473    $ 1,374,585
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   1,714,428    1,379,772

As Adjusted
   $ 3,700,901    $ 2,754,357

Provision for loan losses

GAAP
   $ 380,999    $ 1,962,673
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   704,210    1,902,096

As Adjusted
   $ 1,085,209    $ 3,864,769

Charge-offs

GAAP
   $ (580,851 ) $ (559,672 ) $ (1,651,050 ) $ (1,604,491 )
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   (598,066 ) (598,066 ) (1,556,363 ) (1,556,363 )

As Adjusted
   $ (1,178,917 ) $ (1,157,738 ) $ (3,207,413 ) $ (3,160,854 )

Recoveries

GAAP
   $ 45,739    $ 45,486    $ 146,152    $ 145,503
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   54,639    54,639    149,706    149,706

As Adjusted
   $ 100,378    $ 100,125    $ 295,858    $ 295,209

Net charge-offs

GAAP
   $ (535,112 ) $ (514,186 ) $ (1,504,898 ) $ (1,458,988 )
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   (543,427 ) (543,427 ) (1,406,657 ) (1,406,657 )

As Adjusted
   $ (1,078,539 ) $ (1,057,613 ) $ (2,911,555 ) $ (2,865,645 )

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)

GAAP
   $ 1,832,360    $ 1,832,360
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   1,875,211    1,875,211

As Adjusted
   $ 3,707,571    $ 3,707,571

Net charge-offs %

GAAP
   8.05 % 8.48 % 7.30 % 7.63 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   0.35    0.15    0.26    0.11

As Adjusted
   8.40 % 8.63 % 7.56 % 7.74 %

Delinquency rate (Over 30 Days)

GAAP
   4.86 % 5.27 % 4.86 % 5.27 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   0.25    0.04    0.25    0.04

As Adjusted
   5.11 % 5.31 % 5.11 % 5.31 %

Delinquency rate (Over 90 Days)

GAAP
   2.46 % 2.70 % 2.46 % 2.70 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   0.14    0.02    0.14    0.02

As Adjusted
   2.60 % 2.72 % 2.60 % 2.72 %

   For the Three
Months Ended For the Nine
Months Ended
   August 31, 2009
   (dollars in thousands)
Discover card
Charge-offs

GAAP
   $ (541,272 ) $ (1,560,820 )
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   (598,066 ) (1,556,363 )

As Adjusted
   $ (1,139,338 ) $ (3,117,183 )

Recoveries

GAAP
   $ 45,214    $ 144,901
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   54,639    149,706

As Adjusted
   $ 99,853    $ 294,607

   As of
November 30, 2009
   (dollars in thousands)
Discover card

Total Discover card loans

GAAP
   $ 19,826,153
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   27,229,062

As Adjusted
   $ 47,055,215

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)

GAAP
   $ 1,587,107
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   2,144,461

As Adjusted
   $ 3,731,568

Credit Card Loans

Total credit card loans

GAAP
   $ 20,230,302
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   27,229,062

As Adjusted
   $ 47,459,364

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)

GAAP
   $ 1,647,086
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   2,144,461

As Adjusted
   $ 3,791,547

Total Loans

Total loans

GAAP
   $ 23,625,084
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   27,229,062

As Adjusted
   $ 50,854,146

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)

GAAP
   $ 1,757,899
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   2,144,461

As Adjusted
   $ 3,902,360

Net loans

GAAP
   $ 21,867,185
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   25,084,601

As Adjusted
   $ 46,951,786

Loans over 30 days delinquent

GAAP
   $ 1,161,497    4.92 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   1,539,462    0.39

As Adjusted
   $ 2,700,959    5.31 %

Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest

GAAP
   $ 522,190    2.21 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   694,864    0.18

As Adjusted
   $ 1,217,054    2.39 %

Loans not accruing interest

GAAP
   $ 190,086    0.80 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   248,192    0.06

As Adjusted
   $ 438,278    0.86 %

~~Average Balance Sheet Reconciliation~~

For the Three Months Ended
August 31, 2009 For the Nine Months Ended
August 31, 2009
Average
Balances Interest
Income/Expense Yield Average
Balances Interest
Income/Expense Yield
(dollars in thousands) (dollars in thousands)
Average restricted cash

GAAP
$ —      $ —      —   % $ —      $ —      —   %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
2,537,305    3,996    0.62    2,391,937    15,359    0.86

As Adjusted
$ 2,537,705    $ 3,996    0.62 % $ 2,391,937    $ 15,359    0.86 %

Average investment securities

GAAP
$ 1,593,805    $ 18,062    4.50 % $ 1,434,401    $ 51,606    4.79 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
(984,608 ) (10,539 ) 0.40    (982,458 ) (33,191 ) 0.64

As Adjusted
$ 609,197    $ 7,523    4.90 % $ 451,943    $ 18,415    5.43 %

Average credit card loan receivables

GAAP
$ 24,051,037    $ 761,477    12.56 % $ 25,459,830    $ 2,276,152    11.91 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
24,577,751    838,111    0.49    23,856,122    2,384,909    0.68

As Adjusted
$ 48,628,788    $ 1,599,588    13.05 % $ 49,315,952    $ 4,661,061    12.59 %

Average total loan receivables

GAAP
$ 26,380,203    $ 804,874    12.10 % $ 27,454,927    $ 2,395,423    11.62 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
24,577,751    838,111    0.69    23,856,122    2,384,909    0.79

As Adjusted
$ 50,957,954    $ 1,642,985    12.79 % $ 51,311,049    $ 4,780,332    12.41 %

Average other interest-earning assets

GAAP
$ 2,437,304    $ 3,998    0.65 % $ 2,291,937    $ 15,361    0.89 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
(2,437,304 ) (3,998 ) (0.65 ) (2,291,937 ) (15,361 ) (0.89 )

As Adjusted
$ —      $ —      —   % $ —      $ —      —   %

Average total interest-earning assets

GAAP
$ 39,761,137    $ 833,217    8.31 % $ 39,698,998    $ 2,506,994    8.41 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
23,693,144    827,570    2.07    22,973,665    2,351,716    1.92

As Adjusted
$ 63,454,281    $ 1,660,787    10.38 % $ 62,672,663    $ 4,858,710    10.33 %

Average allowance for loan losses

GAAP
$ (1,921,008 ) $ (1,824,834 )
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
(1,833,584 ) (1,639,025 )

As Adjusted
$ (3,754,592 ) $ (3,463,859 )

Average other assets (non-interest bearing)

GAAP
$ 4,332,432    $ 3,580,461
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
(978,343 ) (476,862 )

As Adjusted
$ 3,354,089    $ 3,103,599

Average total assets

GAAP
$ 42,172,561    $ 41,454,625
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
20,881,217    20,857,778

As Adjusted
$ 63,053,778    $ 62,312,403

Average securitized borrowings

GAAP
$ —      $ —      —   % $ —      $ —      —   %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
22,713,709    77,837    1.36    22,585,331    275,211    1.62

As Adjusted
$ 22,713,709    $ 77,837    1.36 % $ 22,585,331    $ 275,211    1.62 %

Average total borrowings

GAAP
$ 1,636,950    $ 14,883    3.61 % $ 2,685,340    $ 42,359    2.10 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
22,713,709    77,837    (2.10 ) 22,585,331    275,211    (0.43 )

As Adjusted
$ 24,350,659    $ 92,720    1.51 % $ 25,270,671    $ 317,570    1.67 %

Average total interest-bearing liabilities

GAAP
$ 30,817,313    $ 304,401    3.92 % $ 31,276,776    $ 937,126    3.99 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
22,713,709    77,837    (1.09 ) 22,585,331    275,211    (0.99 )

As Adjusted
$ 53,531,022    $ 382,238    2.83 % $ 53,862,107    $ 1,212,337    3.00 %

   For the Three Months Ended
August 31, 2009 For the Nine Months Ended
August 31, 2009
   Average Balances
   (dollars in thousands, except where noted)
Average other liabilities and stockholders’ equity (non-interest earning)

GAAP
   $ 11,355,248    $ 10,177,849
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   (1,832,492 ) (1,727,553 )

As Adjusted
   $ 9,522,756    $ 8,450,296

Average total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

GAAP
   $ 42,172,561    $ 41,454,625
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   20,881,217    20,857,778

As Adjusted
   $ 63,053,778    $ 62,312,403

   Ratios and Other Amounts
Net interest margin

GAAP
   7.95 % 7.62 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   2.00    1.85

As Adjusted
   9.95 % 9.47 %

Net yield on interest-earning assets

GAAP
   5.28 % 5.27 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   2.71    2.48

As Adjusted
   7.99 % 7.75 %

Interest rate spread

GAAP
   4.40 % 4.42 %
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   3.15    2.91

As Adjusted
   7.55 % 7.33 %

Amortization of balance transfer fees in interest income on credit card loans
(dollars in millions)

GAAP
   $ 33    $ 105
Adjustments for Statement No. 167
   13    51

As Adjusted
   $ 46    $ 156

~~Highlights~~Recent Developments

Net income for the first quarter 2011 was ~~$261~~$465 million as compared to a net loss of $104 million in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010 as compared to net income of $151 million in the third quarter 2009 as adjusted.~~2010.

Discover card sales volume ~~increased 5%~~was $24 billion in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010 as compared to 2009, reflecting a continuation~~2011, marking the fifth consecutive quarter of ~~the~~ year-over-year growth ~~seen throughout 2010, due to an increase~~ in ~~average spend per customer and broadened merchant acceptance. However, credit card loan receivables at August~~sales volumes.

We completed the acquisition of The Student Loan Corporation (“SLC”) on December 31, ~~2010 were down 6%, to $45.2 billion, from August 31, 2009 as adjusted due to~~2010. The acquisition added private student loans with a ~~reduction in promotional rate balances and an increase in the payment rate.~~fair value of approximately $3 billion. Total loan receivables ~~were down only modestly~~grew $2.8 billion during the quarter as ~~the~~growth from student loans was offset by a decline in credit card loan receivables ~~was partially offset by an increase in student loans.~~due to higher payment rates.

Credit performance continued to improve ~~during~~in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010. Our net charge-off rate was 7.18% and our over~~2011. The percentage of credit card loans 30 days ~~delinquency rate was 4.16%, decreases of 79 and 36~~or more past due continued to decline, falling 47 basis points ~~respectively, as compared to the second quarter 2010. Additionally, improvement in our outlook for credit performance over the next twelve months led~~since November 30, 2010 to a ~~reduction~~rate of 3.59% at February 28, 2011. This drove a decline in the loan loss reserve rate, which resulted in a ~~$187~~$271 million reduction ~~of our~~in the allowance for loan losses during the ~~third quarter 2010.~~quarter.

Transaction dollar ~~volumes~~volume in our Payment Services segment ~~increased to $39~~was $43 billion in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010,~~2011, an increase of ~~8% as compared to~~21% from the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2009, and~~2010. Pretax income for the ~~number~~segment was $43 million, an increase of 16% from 2010, reflecting higher margins from transactions processed on our PULSE network ~~increased 17% during the same period. Pretax income for the segment rose to $37 million in the third quarter 2010, an increase of 36% from the third quarter 2009, reflecting~~and increased volumes from new and existing ~~clients as well as higher margins from transactions on our PULSE network.~~customers.

~~Direct-to-consumer deposits grew to $19.1 billion at August 31,~~On March 22, 2010, we announced an increase to our quarterly dividend from $0.02 per share to $0.06 per share of ~~$1.5 billion as compared to May 31, 2010.~~common stock.

Outlook

~~The third quarter 2010~~Credit performance continued to ~~reflect growth in sales volumes as well as improvement~~improve in the ~~credit performance~~first quarter 2011 as evidenced by the decline in the delinquency rate of our loan portfolio on both a sequential and year-over-year basis. As we continue to invest in marketing and advertising, we expect that Discover card sales volumes will also continue to grow, although we anticipate it may be accompanied by higher payment rates. We believe that the level of credit card loan receivables, which has declined during 2010, has stabilized as of the end of the third quarter and expect that it will remain around that level for the fourth quarter.

loans 30 or more days past due. We expect net charge-off dollars in the fourth quarter to remain in a reasonably tight range around the third quarter level. The net charge-off rate on total loans, however, could increase in the fourth quarter as a result of an anticipated decline in total loans due to the sale of federal student loan receivables as discussed in “—Recent Developments” below.

Interest yield on credit card loan receivables declined slightly to 12.86% in the third quarter, down 7 basis points from the second quarter, reflecting the impact of the implementation of CARD Act provisions, partially offset by a decline in interest charge-offs. In the fourth quarter, we expect that interest yield on credit card loan receivables will decline further as the impact of implemented CARD Act changes is more fully reflectedreductions in our ~~results, although the impact~~delinquency rates in 2011 as compared to 2010 levels will continue, and that this is ~~expected~~likely to ~~be partially offset by improvement~~result in ~~interest charge-offs.~~

At August 31, 2010, we had $9.1 billion in our liquidity investment portfolio, which we expect will remain relatively stable through the end of 2010. As asset-backed securitized borrowings have matured, much of the funding they provided has been replaced by issuances of direct-to-consumer deposits and a planned reduction in our liquidity investment portfolio. In the fourth quarter 2010, we expect to continue to grow direct-to-consumer deposits. With respect to securitizations, in September 2010, we issued $600 million of public asset-backed securities and utilized $200 million of capacity under private asset-backed conduit funding facilities. Future

asset-backed securities issuances will depend in part on the impact of legislative and regulatory developments on securitizations. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—Asset-Backed Securities Regulations” for additional discussion.

Payment Services’ transaction volume is expected to continue to grow. We plan to continue making investments to build brand awareness and our global acceptance network for credit, debit and cash access transactions. We believe that our strategic network alliances with key card networks such as Korea’s BC Card, Japan’s JCB, China UnionPay and Serbia’s DinaCard, along with continued development of merchant acquirer relationships, will be our foundation for driving global acceptance and volumes.

~~Recent Developments~~

On September 17, 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary Discover Bank and The Student Loan Corporation (“SLC”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Discover Bank agreed to acquire SLC for $600 million, or $30 per share, subject to an expected purchase price closing adjustment in the form of a cash payment of approximately $150 million by Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), 80% owner of SLC, to Discover Bank. The result is that Discover Bank expects to have a net cash outlay of approximately $450 million for the acquisition of SLC. The acquisition will occur through the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank with and into SLC, with SLC surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Bank. Immediately prior to the merger, SLC is expected to sell $28 billion of assets to SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae) and $8.7 billion of assets to Citibank. Discover Bank will acquire in the merger approximately $4.2 billion of private student loans and related assets, along with assuming $3.4 billion of SLC’s existing asset-backed securitization debt funding for the loans. The transaction is expected to close after the end of the fiscal year but before the end of the calendar year, subject to closing conditions including, among others, the approval of the Merger Agreement by SLC’s stockholders and the closing of SLC’s asset sale transactions. There can be no assurance, however, that the acquisition will close by the end of the calendar year, if at all. For more information, see Note 18: Subsequent Eventsfurther reductions to our ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~allowance for loan losses.

~~On September 23, 2010, we completed~~The effect of implementing the ~~sale~~provisions of ~~$1.5 billion of federal student loans to the U.S. Department of Education as part of the 2009-10 Loan Purchase Program under the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (“ECASLA”).~~

~~Legislative and Regulatory Developments~~

~~Legislation Addressing Credit Card Practices~~

~~In May 2009,~~ the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “CARD Act”) ~~was enacted. The CARD Act made numerous changes to~~has had an unfavorable impact on the ~~Truth in Lending Act, affecting the marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and other aspects~~yield of ~~the consumer~~our credit card ~~business. Several provisions~~loan portfolio. We expect this to continue throughout 2011 which, along with an increase in the level of balance transfer promotional offers, will contribute to further credit card yield compression. Additionally, the ~~CARD Act became effective~~shift in ~~August 2009, but most~~our loan portfolio mix to lower-rate student loans will continue to reduce the overall yield on loan receivables. Although improvements in funding related costs served to moderate loan yield compression in the first quarter 2011, we expect net interest margin to decline further and likely at a faster rate during the rest of 2011 as further loan yield compression is expected to outpace improvements in funding related costs.

On March 8, 2011, we completed a public issuance of $1 billion of credit card asset-backed securities at an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 35 basis points and a maturity of three years. Our funding plan for 2011 anticipates growth in our deposit channels and additional issuances of credit card asset-backed securities when we believe market conditions are favorable.

Investments in marketing and advertising during the ~~requirements became effective in February~~second half of 2010 and ~~others became effective~~continuing into 2011 should continue to contribute to growth in ~~August 2010.~~

~~A number~~Discover card sales volume. We will continue to emphasize merchant acceptance, rewards programs and marketing efforts to strengthen our brand. We also plan to increase the level of targeted promotional rate offers, which we expect to contribute to modest growth in the ~~CARD Act’s requirements reflected our existing practices and have not required modifications~~level of policies or procedures. Certain provisions of the CARD Act, however, have required and will require us to make additional fundamental changes to our business practices and systems. We are continuing to evaluate appropriate modifications to products, pricing, marketing strategies and other business practices that will be in compliance with the law, will be attractive to consumers and will provide a good return for our stockholders. The restrictions on late and other penalty fees will reduce loan fee revenues and may impact our ability to deter late payments. The requirement to review annual percentage rate increases since January 1, 2009 will reduce our interest income. The full impact of the CARD Act ultimately depends upon successful implementation of our strategies, consumer behavior, and the actions of our competitors, in addition to further Federal Reserve and Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection interpretation of the provisions.

The CARD Act also requires the Federal Reserve and the Government Accountability Office to conduct various studies, including a review of interchange fees, reasons for credit limit reductions and rate increases, “small business” cards, and credit card ~~terms~~receivables in the second half of 2011.

Legislative and ~~disclosures. Based on the results of these studies, new requirements that negatively impact us may be introduced as future legislation or regulation.~~Regulatory Developments

Financial Regulatory Reform

~~In July~~The 2010 ~~the President signed into law the “Dodd-Frank~~Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ~~Act”~~Act (the “Reform Act”)~~, which~~ contains a comprehensive set of provisions designed to govern the practices and oversight of financial institutions and other participants in the financial markets. The Reform Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory changes, could have a significant impact on us by, for example, requiring us to change our business practices, requiring us to meet more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements, limiting our ability to pursue business opportunities, imposing additional costs on us, limiting fees we can charge for services, impacting the value of our assets, or otherwise adversely affecting our businesses.

The Reform Act addresses risks to the economy and the payments system, especially those posed by large systemically significant financial ~~firms, including~~firms. Under the Reform Act, bank holding companies with ~~assets of at least~~ $50 billion ~~which~~or more in total consolidated assets (which would include ~~us. It does so through~~us) are considered systemically significant and are subject to heightened prudential standards, including heightened capital, leverage, liquidity, credit exposure and risk management requirements and to other requirements that may be recommended by the new Financial Stability Oversight Council and implemented by the Federal Reserve. In addition, such companies (including us) will be subject to annual stress tests by the Federal Reserve and to new requirements regarding resolution plans (so-called “living wills”). On March 29, 2011, the FDIC and Federal Reserve issued a ~~variety~~proposed rule to implement the requirement that such companies submit to the bank regulatory agencies a resolution plan or “living will” in the event of ~~measures, including increased capital~~material financial distress or failure. The proposed rule addresses the content of resolution plans, the timing of submission of resolution plans and ~~liquidity requirements, limits on leverage, enhanced supervisory authority (including authority to limit activities~~the review process of such plans by the FDIC and growth), regulatory oversight of non-banking entities, broad new powers to seize and wind down failed systemically-important financial firms, including non-bank financial companies (and the establishment of a mechanism to recover such costs through assessments on large financial firms),Federal Reserve.

The Reform Act also provides for enhanced regulation of derivatives, restrictions on and additional disclosure of executive compensation, and additional corporate governance requirements and ~~oversight~~for more stringent requirements with respect to affiliate transactions, mergers and acquisitions, proprietary trading and investment in, and sponsorship of, ~~credit rating agencies.~~ hedge funds and private equity funds. The Reform Act also grants broad new powers to the government to seize and conduct an orderly liquidation of failing systemically-important financial firms, including bank holding companies and other nonbank financial companies, and to recover the costs of such liquidations through assessments on large financial firms.

Effective July 2011, the Reform Act requires a bank holding company that elects treatment as a financial holding company, ~~including~~such as us, to be both well-capitalized and well-managed in addition to the existing requirement that a financial holding company’s subsidiary banks be well-capitalized and well-managed. If we were to fail to meet these requirements, we could be restricted from engaging in new financial activities or acquisitions or be required to discontinue or divest existing activities that are not generally permissible for bank holding companies.

~~Additionally, the~~The Reform Act ~~establishes~~established the ~~Bureau of~~ Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the ~~“BCFP”~~“CFPB”) ~~within the Federal Reserve,~~, which will regulate consumer ~~credit.~~financial products and services provided by certain financial services providers, including us. On

July 21, 2011, ~~the~~many consumer financial protection functions currently assigned to the federal banking and other designated agencies will shift to the ~~BCFP.~~CFPB. The ~~BCFP will have broad rulemaking and enforcement authority over providers of credit, savings and payment services and products. The BCFP~~CFPB will be directed to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive practices” and ensure that all consumers have access to markets for consumer financial products and services ~~and~~ that ~~such markets~~ are fair, transparent and competitive. The ~~BCFP~~CFPB will have rulemaking and interpretive authority under ~~existing and future~~federal consumer financial services laws (including the CARD Act) and broad supervisory, examination and enforcement authority over ~~institutions subject to its jurisdiction, which would include~~large providers of consumer financial products and services, such as us. State officials will be authorized to enforce consumer protection rules issued by the ~~BCFP.~~CFPB pursuant the consumer protection provisions of the Reform Act.

In addition, the Reform Act requires, effective July 21, 2011, that interchange fees paid to or charged by payment card issuers on debit card transactions ~~must~~ be “reasonable and proportional” to the issuer’s cost in connection with ~~authorization, clearance or settlement of~~ such transactions. ~~The Reform Act directs the Federal Reserve to enact rules to implement this requirement, and~~It also ~~to enact rules to prohibit~~prohibits debit card networks and issuers from requiring debit transactions to be processed solely on a single payment network, or two or more affiliated ~~networks. Further,~~payment networks, but the effective date of these provisions is not yet determined. In addition, in provisions already effective, the Reform Act prohibits credit/debit network rules that restrict merchants from offering discounts to customers in order to encourage them to use a particular form of payment, or from setting minimum transaction amounts of $10.00 or less for use of credit cards, ~~(or, with respect to government agencies and educational institutions, maximum transaction amounts),~~ as long as such merchant practices do not differentiate on the basis of the issuer or network. The Federal Reserve issued proposed implementing regulations in December 2010 and is expected to promulgate final rules in April. The impact of these provisions on the debit card market and ~~the~~our PULSE network ~~is uncertain at this time and~~ will depend upon ~~Federal Reserve implementing regulations,~~the outcome of the regulatory process, the actions of our competitors, and the behavior of other marketplace participants. If the Federal Reserve’s regulations are finalized as proposed, PULSE’s business practices, network transaction volume, revenue, and prospects for future growth, as well as the debit card market as a whole, may be negatively impacted. The constitutionality of the interchange fee provisions is being challenged in court, and implementation of the Federal Reserve regulations could be delayed by Congress, through legislation that has been introduced in both houses of Congress.

In addition, the Reform Act contains several provisions that could ~~increase~~change the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) deposit insurance premiums paid by Discover ~~Bank, including a change in the assessment base~~Bank. See “—FDIC Initiatives Regarding Assessments” below for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible equity and an increase in the minimum reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits (with the FDIC having until September 30, 2020 to meet the new minimum through assessments on insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or more).more information. Various other assessments and fees are also authorized in the legislation and others could be authorized in the future.

As described below under “—Asset-Backed Securities Regulations,” the Reform Act also imposes a number of significant changes relating to the asset-backed securities and structured finance markets, which may impact our ability and/or desire to utilize those markets to meet funding and liquidity needs.

Many provisions of the Reform Act require the adoption of rules to implement. In addition, the Reform Act mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. The effect of the Reform Act and its implementing regulations on our business and operations is subject to significant uncertainty and could be ~~significant.~~substantial. In addition, we may be required to invest significant management time and resources to address the various provisions of the Reform Act and the numerous regulations that are required to be issued under it. The Reform Act, any related legislation and any implementing regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Asset-Backed Securities Regulations

While we have capacity to issue new asset-backed securities from our securitization trusts, there has been uncertainty in the securitization market recently as a result of revised accounting standards and related guidance from the FDIC as well as proposed new Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules governing the issuance of asset-backed securities and additional requirements contained in the Reform Act.

~~FDIC Rule~~

~~The ability of issuers of asset-backed securities to obtain necessary credit ratings for their issuances has been based, in part, on the FDIC’s safe-harbor rule entitled~~Treatment by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Conservator or Receiver of Financial Assets Transferred by an Insured Depository Institution in Connection with a Securitization or Participation, which provides that the FDIC, as conservator or receiver, will not, using its power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts, seek to reclaim or recover assets transferred in connection with a securitization, or recharacterize them as assets of the insured depository institution, provided such transfer meets the conditions for sale accounting treatment under GAAP. Pursuant to FASB guidance for transfers of financial assets, effective for us on December 1, 2009, certain transfers of assets to special purpose entities (including Discover Bank’s transfer of assets to the Discover Card Master Trust) no longer qualify for sale accounting treatment. Consequently, there has been uncertainty in the securitization market as to how the FDIC will treat assets transferred into securitization vehicles under the new FASB guidance.

In March 2010, the FDIC published a final rule that preserves the safe-harbor treatment applicable under the existing FDIC rule for beneficial interests in securitizations of revolving assets issued on or prior to September 30, 2010 so long as those securitizations would have complied with the original safe harbor under GAAP in effect prior to November 15, 2009. On September 27, 2010, the FDIC approved a final rule that preserves the safe-harbor treatment applicable to revolving trusts and master trusts, which we believe includes the trusts used in our credit card securitization program. Other legislative and regulatory developments, namely the proposed SEC Regulation AB 2, the securitization and rating agency provisions of the Reform Act and the federal banking agencies’ notice regarding their consideration of replacement of the ratings-based approach for assessing capital charges against securitization exposures, may, however, impact our ability and/or desire to issue asset-backed securities in the future. See below for additional information.

~~SEC Regulation AB 2~~II

In April 2010, the ~~SEC~~Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) proposed revised rules for asset-backed securities offerings (“SEC Regulation AB 2”II”) that, if adopted, would substantially change the disclosure, reporting and offering process for public and private offerings of asset-backed securities, including those offered under our credit card securitization program. The proposed rules, if adopted in their current form, would, among other things, impose as a condition for the shelf registration of asset-backed securities a requirement that the

sponsor of the asset-backed securities offering hold a minimum of 5% of the nominal amount of each of the tranches sold or transferred to investors (or, in the case of revolving master trusts, an originator’s interest of a minimum of 5% of the nominal amount of the securitization exposures) and not hedge the credit risk of those holdings. Issuers of publicly offered asset-backed securities would be required to disclose more information regarding the underlying assets and to file a computer program that demonstrates the effect of the transaction’s waterfall of distributions. In addition, the proposals would alter the safe-harbor standards for the private placement of asset-backed securities to impose informational requirements similar to those that would apply to registered public offerings of such securities.

Reform Act

The Reform Act also imposes a number of significant changes relating to the asset-backed securities and structured finance markets, including a requirement that regulators jointly adopt regulations requiring the sponsor of a securitization to retain, subject to certain exemptions and exceptions, at least 5% unhedged credit risk on securitized exposures. The Reform Act also requires the SEC to impose asset-level registration statement disclosure requirements if the data is necessary for investors to independently perform due ~~diligence.~~diligence and prohibits conflicts of interest relating to securitizations.

As required by the Reform Act, six federal regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the SEC, have jointly released for comment an interagency risk retention proposal. The proposed rules would require a baseline amount of retained risk equal to 5% of a transaction unless the securitized assets meet certain indicia of creditworthiness, and would prohibit the hedging of the credit risk associated with the securitized assets or pledging the retained interest on a nonrecourse basis. The means by which the retained interests are to be held are relatively flexible, and would permit the seller’s interest in a master trust to be held to satisfy the requirement. Because our seller’s interest is contractually required to exceed 5% of the securitized interests, we believe it is likely that our existing risk retention will be sufficient for our public credit card securitizations. We are still evaluating other potential effects of the proposal. Until we have had further opportunity to evaluate the proposal and to consider final rules, when adopted, we cannot predict the impact of these rules on our credit card securitization program or our liquidity.

Additionally, the Reform Act nullified Rule 436(g) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) effective immediately, which had provided that credit ratings assigned by a rating agency would not be considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an expert. This change requires registrants (including issuers of asset-backed securities) to obtain written consent of a credit rating agency in order to include the agency’s rating in a registration statement and subjects the rating agencies to “expert liability” under Section 11 of the Securities Act for misstatements or omissions of materials facts in connection with such credit rating disclosure. In response to this measure, the major credit rating agencies issued statements indicating that they would be unwilling to provide the required consent. In order to provide a transition period, the SEC subsequently issued a “no-action” letter in July 2010 allowing issuers of asset-backed securities to omit credit ratings from registration statements until January 24, 2011. In November 2010, the SEC issued a second letter extending this no-action period indefinitely. Failure to ultimately resolve this issue ~~after expiration of the no-action period~~ could impact our ability to offer registered asset-backed securities.

Section 939A of the Reform Act requires each federal agency to review and to remove references to external credit ratings from their regulations that require the use of an assessment of creditworthiness of a security, and to substitute in their place other standards of creditworthiness that the agencies determine to be appropriate for such regulations. In response to such requirement, in August 2010, the federal banking agencies issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking soliciting comment on alternatives to the use of credit ratings in their risk-based capital rules for banking organizations, including alternatives to the ratings-based approach in such rules for securitization exposures. It is not clear what alternatives will ultimately be adopted. Any such alternatives could, among other things, significantly affect the amount of capital that banking organizations are required to keep against such exposures.

It is uncertain at this time what the rules implementing the provisions of the Reform Act related to asset-backed securities will ultimately look like and what impact they will have on our ability and/or desire to issue asset-backed securities in the future. For instance, with respect to risk retention, we currently hold the seller’s interest in our securitization trusts as well as certain subordinated tranches issued by these trusts, which collectively represent approximately 57% of the principal receivables balance in our trusts as of August 31, 2010. Although we believe it likely that any final regulations implementing the Reform Act risk retention requirements, which must be adopted on an interagency basis, will recognize these interests as satisfying the risk retention requirement, we will not have certainty until the proposed rules have been promulgated. The SEC ~~recently~~

has published a timetable for the release of its rules implementing the provisions of the Reform Act including those impacting the issuance of asset-backed ~~securities, which are scheduled to be released between October 2010 and July 2011.~~securities. However, the SEC has provided no timetable for implementing the disclosure changes in proposed SEC Regulation AB 2,II, as the Reform Act does not mandate the timing for adoption of those changes.

Student Loan Legislation

The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“HCERA”). HCERA requires all federal student loans originated after July 2010 to be made directly by the federal government, rather than by private institutions through the Federal Family Education Loan Program. Because HCERA allows financial institutions to continue offering private student loans, we do not currently expect it to have a significant impact on our private student loan program. The Reform Act referenced above provides for a study of private education loans and lenders and creates a private education loan ~~Ombudsman~~ombudsman within the ~~Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.~~CFPB. The study could lead to additional legislation or regulation in the future. In addition, legislation has been introduced in ~~Congress~~past Congresses that would make it substantially easier for borrowers to discharge private student loans in bankruptcy, ~~as described further below.~~

~~Bankruptcy Legislation~~

~~A bill referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee would disallow claims in Chapter 7 bankruptcy based on “high cost” consumer debt~~ and ~~exclude consumers with~~ such debt from the bankruptcy “means test.” The means test requires debtors who can afford to repay a portion of their debts through Chapter 13 repayment plan do so, rather than discharge all indebtedness under Chapter 7. The proposed legislation, if enacted, could increase the percentage of bankruptcy filers who obtain full debt discharges to the detriment of all unsecured lenders, and could result in increased charge-offs of our loan receivables.~~It is unclear whether this legislation will be considered by the next Congress.~~

Congress also considered legislation this year to allow bankruptcy courts to restructure first mortgage loans (e.g., by reducing the loan amount to the value of the collateral, a process referred to as “cramdown”). Such a change would likely increase the number of individuals who file for bankruptcy, which would adversely impact all creditors including us. While the House of Representatives approved a cramdown bill, the Senate did not. This or similar legislation could be reintroduced in the ~~next~~current Congress.

In addition, a bill has been introduced in Congress that would remove current limitations on the dischargeability of private student loan debts in bankruptcy. If enacted, the bill would make it easier for borrowers of private student loans to obtain a discharge of their student loan debts. The bill was recently approved by a subcommittee and forwarded to the House Committee on the Judiciary for consideration. The prospects for further advancement of this bill in the current Congressional session are unclear.

Compensation Developments

In June 2010, the Federal Reserve, together with the FDIC and the other banking agencies, issued final guidance designed to ensure that incentive compensation practices of financial organizations take into account risk and are consistent with safety and soundness. ~~The~~In 2010, the Federal Reserve ~~recently~~ conducted a special horizontal review of compensation practices at more than twenty large complex banking organizations, including us, with the expectation that incentive compensation practices appropriately balance risk and financial results and avoid creating incentives for employees to take imprudent risks.

The Reform Act ~~described above under “—Financial Regulatory Reform”~~ imposes additional disclosures and restrictions on ~~compensation.~~compensation and requires various regulatory agencies to adopt implementing rules. On March 30, 2011, seven federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the SEC, approved a joint proposed rulemaking to implement a provision in the Reform Act on incentive-based compensation practices. Under the proposed rule, all financial institutions with total consolidated assets of $1 billion or more, including us, would be prohibited from offering incentive-based compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risk taking. All covered institutions would be required to provide additional disclosures and to maintain policies and procedures to ensure compliance. Additionally, for covered institutions with at least $50 billion in total consolidated assets, such as us, the proposed rule requires that a portion of certain executive officers’ incentive-based compensation be deferred for a minimum of three years and provides for the adjustment of deferred payments to reflect actual losses or other measures of performance that become known during the deferral period. The form and timing of any final rules are uncertain at this time.

Our compensation practices are affected by Reform Act amendments to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requiring a non-binding “say-on-pay” vote to be provided at least once every three years at a shareholders’ meeting and a non-binding shareholder vote to be provided at least once every six years to determine the frequency of say-on-pay votes. These votes must be provided at meetings of shareholders occurring after January 21, 2011, including our annual meeting on April 7, 2011. In addition, the Reform Act requires that, if shareholders are voting on a merger or similar transaction, then they must be provided a separate non-binding vote to approve golden parachute compensation arrangements that had not previously been subject to a say-on-pay vote. The golden parachute disclosure and vote is required in proxy statements and other schedules and forms initially filed on or after April 25, 2011.

The scope and content of these policies and regulations on executive compensation are continuing to develop and are likely to continue evolving in the near future. It cannot be determined at this time whether compliance with such policies and regulations will adversely affect our ability to hire, retain and motivate our key employees.

FDIC Initiatives Regarding Assessments

~~Market failures have significantly depleted~~The Reform Act contains several provisions that change how the FDIC deposit insurance ~~fund~~premiums paid by Discover Bank are calculated. One provision of the ~~FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. In January 2010,~~Reform Act requires the FDIC ~~issued an Advance Notice~~to amend its regulations to change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of ~~Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on ways that~~total deposits to average consolidated total assets less average tangible equity. In February 2011, the ~~FDIC’s risk-based~~FDIC approved a final rule to implement this change and to significantly modify how deposit insurance assessment ~~system could~~rates are calculated for banks with assets of $10 billion or more, including Discover Bank. The final rule was effective April 1, 2011 with the first quarterly assessment under this new rule due September 30, 2011. Effective April 1, 2011, the assessment rates will be ~~changed~~determined through a calculation which uses various financial ratios of the bank which were designed by the FDIC to ~~account for~~measure the ~~risks posed by certain employee incentive compensation programs.~~bank’s risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The ~~proposed rulemaking was~~assessment rates will be subject to ~~a public comment period, which has expired, but no~~adjustments based upon (1) long-term unsecured debt, (2) long-term unsecured debt issued by another insured depository institution, and (3) brokered deposits for certain higher risk institutions. Additionally, the final rule ~~has been issued. Additionally, in May~~permits the FDIC to impose additional discretionary assessment rate adjustments.

Another provision of the Reform Act requires the FDIC to increase the minimum reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits (with the FDIC having until September 30, 2020 to meet the new minimum through assessments on insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or more) while also removing the cap on the size of the fund. In December 2010, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to revise the deposit assessment system applicable to large institutions, which would include Discover Bank, to better align assessment rates with the risks of such institutions. New initial and total base assessment rates would be effective January 1, 2011. The proposal includes a larger assessment on deposits that are treated under applicable banking regulations as brokered deposits to the extent that brokered deposits exceed 10% of the total deposits of a bank, which would adversely affect the assessment paid by Discover Bank, assuming its current deposit level and composition. The proposed rulemaking was subject to a public comment period, which expired in early July 2010, but no final rule ~~has been issued. As discussed above under “—Financial Regulatory Reform,”~~setting the increased reserve ratio at 2%.

In addition, the Reform Act ~~will likely increase~~removed the ~~amounts that we will have to pay to~~cap (1.5% of insured deposits) on the size of the fund and makes the payment of dividends from the fund by the FDIC ~~for~~discretionary. Under the final rules, the FDIC suspended dividends indefinitely. However, the FDIC adopted progressively lower assessment rate schedules that will take effect when the reserve ratio exceeds 1.15%, 2% and 2.5%. Any future changes to deposit ~~insurance.~~insurance assessments or other bank industry fees could have a significant adverse impact on our financial conditions and results of operations.

International Initiatives Related to Capital and Liquidity

~~The~~In December 2010, the Basel Committee ~~on Banking Supervision~~ released ~~two consultative documents proposing~~the Basel III rules text, which includes significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity ~~requirements in December 2009, commonly referred to as “Basel III.” The~~requirements. Basel Committee considered public comments received on the December proposal, the results of a qualitative impact study and the economic impact over the transition period. In July 2010, the Committee issued statements that reflected, among other things, decisions reached on certain elements of the comprehensive proposals, including the overall design of the capital and liquidity reform package.

In September 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision, the oversight body of the Basel Committee, announced minimum capital ratios and transition periods and endorsed the statements the Committee released in July 2010. The announcementIII provides that: (i) the minimum requirement for the Tier 1 common equity ratio will be increased from the current 2% level to 4.5%, to be phased in by January 1, 2015, and (ii) the minimum requirement for the Tier 1 capital ratio will be increased from 4% to 6%, to be phased in by January 1, 2015. The Tier 1 common equity ratio will be calculated after applying certain regulatory deductions, including for deferred tax assets above prescribed limitations that arise from timing differences.

In addition, Basel III includes a “capital conservation buffer” that requires banking organizations to maintain an additional 2.5% of Tier 1 common equity to total risk weighted assets on top of the minimum requirement, which will be phased in between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses in periods of financial and economic distress and, while banks are allowed to draw on the buffer during periods of stress, if a bank’s regulatory capital ratios approach the minimum requirement, the bank will be subject to constraints on earnings distributions. In addition, Basel III includes a countercyclical buffer within a range of 0% – 2.5%, which would be implemented according to ~~national~~a particular nation’s circumstances.

These capital requirements are supplemented under Basel III by a non-risk-based leverage ratio. A minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3% will be tested during the parallel run period starting January 1, 2013. Based on the results of the parallel run period, any final adjustments would be carried out in the first half of 2017.

~~The September 2010~~ Basel III ~~announcement~~ states that systemically important banks should have higher “loss absorbing capacity” than required by the Basel III standards. The ~~announcement~~Committee will complete a study of the magnitude of additional loss

absorbency that global systemically important banks should have by mid-2011. Basel III also reaffirms the Basel Committee’s intention to introduce higher capital requirements on securitization and trading activities at the end of 2011.

The Basel III liquidity proposals have three main elements: (i) a “liquidity coverage ratio” designed to ensure that a bank maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality assets sufficient to meet the bank’s

liquidity needs over a 30-day time horizon under an acute liquidity stress scenario, (ii) a “net stable funding ratio” designed to promote more medium and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over a one-year time horizon, and (iii) a set of monitoring tools that the Basel Committee indicates should be considered as the minimum types of information that banks should report to supervisors. After an observation period beginning in 2011, the liquidity coverage ratio will become effective on January 1, 2015. The revised net stable funding ratio will become effective January 1, 2018.

The U.S. federal banking agencies expressed support for the agreements reached by the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision set forth in the announcement made in September 2010. While the announcement provided clarity on the minimum capital levels, many of the details of the new framework will remain unclear until the final release is issued. The Basel Committee is expected to release the final detailed requirements later this year. Implementation ~~of any final provisions~~ of Basel III in the U.S. will require implementing regulations and guidelines by U.S. banking regulators, which may differ in significant ways from the recommendations published by the Basel Committee. It is unclear how U.S. banking regulators will define “well-capitalized” in their implementation of Basel III.

The Reform Act also includes provisions related to increased capital and liquidity requirements. Such provisions would establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements on a consolidated basis for all depository institution holding companies and insured depository institutions that cannot be less than the ~~minimum currently~~strictest requirements in effect for depository ~~institutions.~~institutions as of the date of enactment of the Reform Act (i.e., July 21, 2010).

We are not able to predict at this time the precise content of capital and liquidity guidelines or regulations that may be adopted by regulatory agencies having authority over us and our subsidiaries or the impact that any changes in regulation would have on us. IfHowever, we expect that the new standards will generally require us or our banking subsidiaries to maintain more capital, with common equity as a more predominant component, or manage the configuration of our assets and liabilities in order to comply with formulaic liquidity requirements, ~~such regulation~~which could significantly impact our return on equity, financial condition, operations, capital position and ability to pursue business opportunities.

~~* * *~~

The remaining discussion provides a summary of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010 compared to our results of operations for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted. It also provides information about our loan receivables as of August 31, 2010 as compared to November 30, 2009 as adjusted and August 31, 2009 as adjusted. For a reconciliation of GAAP to as adjusted financial data, see “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”

Segments

We manage our business activities in two segments: Direct Banking, and Payment Services. In compiling the segment results that follow, our Direct Banking segment bears all overhead costs that are not specifically associated with a particular segment and all costs associated with Discover Network marketing, servicing and infrastructure, with the exception of an allocation of direct and incremental costs driven by our Payment Services segment.

Direct Banking. Our Direct Banking segment includes Discover card-branded credit cards issued to individuals and small businesses ~~that are accepted on the Discover Network~~ and other consumer products and services, including ~~personal~~student loans, ~~student~~personal loans, prepaid cards and other consumer lending and deposit products offered through our Discover Bank subsidiary.

Payment Services. Our Payment Services segment includes the PULSE ~~Network,~~network, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network; Diners Club, a global payments network; and our third-party issuing business, which includes credit, debit and prepaid cards issued on the Discover Network by third parties.

The following table presents segment data (dollars in thousands):

   For the Three Months Ended
August 31,    For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
   2010 2009    2010 2009
Direct Banking⁽¹⁾

Interest income
   $ 1,535,934    $ 1,660,592    $ 4,646,856    $ 4,857,690
Interest expense
   389,059    382,188    1,207,322    1,212,149

Net interest income
   1,146,875    1,278,404    3,439,534    3,645,541
Provision for loan losses
   712,565    1,085,209    2,824,035    3,864,769
Other income
   495,771    514,481    1,423,823    1,455,914
Other expense
   534,782    489,596    1,465,749    1,545,611

Income (loss) before income tax expense
   395,299    218,080    573,573    (308,925 )

Payment Services

Interest income
   5    195    15    1,020
Interest expense
   78    50    160    190

Net interest income
   (73 ) 145    (145 ) 830
Provision for loan losses
   —      —      —      —
Other income
   68,373    61,236    199,041    179,921
Other expense
   31,456    34,242    88,841    97,978

Income before income tax expense
   36,844    27,139    110,055    82,773

Total income (loss) before income tax expense
   $ 432,143    $ 245,219    $ 683,628    $ (226,153 )

~~(1)~~

The 2009 Direct Banking segment information is presented on an as adjusted basis. No adjustments have been made to the Payment Services segment. See reconciliation in “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”


	For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2011			2010
Direct Banking
Interest income	$	1,552,957		$	1,559,147
Interest expense		382,657			413,686

Net interest income		1,170,300			1,145,461
Provision for loan losses		417,709			1,387,206
Other income		486,063			480,341
Other expense		561,752			446,261

Income before income tax expense		676,902			(207,665	)

Payment Services
Interest income		7			3
Interest expense		71			38

Net interest income		(64	)		(35	)
Provision for loan losses		—			—
Other income		76,561			65,535
Other expense		33,396			28,543

Income before income tax expense		43,101			36,957

Total income before income tax expense	$	720,003		$	(170,708	)

The following table presents information on transaction volume ~~(amounts in~~(in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,				For the Nine Months Ended August 31,				For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010		2009		2010		2009		2011		2010
Network Transaction Volume
PULSE Network	$	30,581,850	$	28,051,978	$	86,845,109	$	84,634,195	$	34,379,837	$	27,617,635
Third-Party Issuers		1,793,785		1,446,308		5,034,051		4,149,286		1,771,948		1,561,929
Diners Club		6,542,418		6,465,990		19,805,455		19,000,168		6,997,568		6,554,504

Total Payment Services		38,918,053		35,964,276		111,684,615		107,783,649		43,149,353		35,734,068
Discover Network—Proprietary⁽¹⁾		24,880,163		23,579,434		71,684,416		67,976,397		24,784,625		23,172,534

Total Volume	$	63,798,216	$	59,543,710	$	183,369,031	$	175,760,046	$	67,933,978	$	58,906,602

Transactions Processed on Networks
Discover Network		418,423		390,643		1,192,556		1,126,605		409,690		381,562
PULSE Network		882,172		753,201		2,407,359		2,201,903		929,260		719,906

Total		1,300,595		1,143,844		3,599,915		3,328,508		1,338,950		1,101,468

Credit Card Volume
Discover Card Volume⁽²⁾	$	25,552,568	$	23,955,402	$	73,644,406	$	72,256,730	$	25,759,260	$	23,844,456
Discover Card Sales Volume⁽³⁾	$	23,992,715	$	22,768,927	$	69,251,162	$	65,556,858	$	23,990,180	$	22,399,675

(1)	Represents gross proprietary sales volume on the Discover Network.

(2)	Represents Discover card activity related to net sales, balance transfers, cash advances and fee-based products.

(3)	Represents Discover card activity related to net sales.

Direct Banking

Our Direct Banking segment reported a pretax income of ~~$395 million and $574 million for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010, respectively, as compared to pretax income of $218~~$677 million for the three months ended ~~August 31, 2009~~February 28, 2011 as ~~adjusted and~~compared to a pretax loss of ~~$309~~$208 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~August 31, 2009 as adjusted.~~February 28, 2010.

Discover card sales volume was up in both the quarter-to-date and year-to-date periods ending August 31, 2010 as compared to the prior year periods, reflecting higher average spend per customer, as well as a continued increase in merchant acceptance. Loan receivables totaled ~~$50.1~~$51.7 billion at ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, which was ~~down~~up from ~~$50.9~~$48.8 billion at ~~August 31, 2009 as adjusted, as~~November 30, 2010. This was primarily driven by the increase in private student loans due to the acquisition of SLC (see Note: 2 Business Combinations) partially offset by a decline in credit card ~~loans~~loans. Discover Card sales volume was ~~partially offset by growth in student loans. The decline in credit card loans was driven by a reduction in promotional rate balances and~~$24 billion for the three months ended February 28, 2011, an increase ~~in the payment rate.~~

~~Net interest income declined during the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010~~of 7% as compared to the ~~three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted, largely due to a lower net interest margin as well~~same period in the prior year. Although sales volume increased, credit card loans declined as a ~~lower average level of loan receivables. The decline in net interest margin is reflective~~result of an increase in ~~lower~~payment rate.

In the first quarter 2011, net interest margin was 9.22%, an increase of 21 basis points from the same period in the prior year, and net interest income was $1.2 billion, an increase of $25 million from the first quarter 2010. The main contributor to improvements in margin and net interest income was a decline in funding related costs. For a more detailed discussion on net interest income, see “—Net Interest Income.”

At February 28, 2011, our 30-day delinquency rate ~~student loan balances, the impact of legislative changes~~ on credit ~~card yield and higher funding costs. This~~cards was ~~partially offset by a reduction in lower yielding promotional rate credit card balances, higher interest rates on standard balances and lower interest charge-offs.~~

~~At August 31, 2010, our over 30-days delinquency rate was 4.16%~~3.59% as compared to ~~5.11%~~4.06% at ~~August 31, 2009 as adjusted, which is~~November 30, 2010, reflective of continued improvement in credit performance. ~~At August 31, 2010,~~For the period ended February 28, 2011, our net charge-off rate on credit cards declined to ~~7.18%~~5.96%, compared to 9.00% for the ~~three months then~~period ended compared to 8.40% for the same period in 2009 as adjusted. For the nine months ended August 31, 2010, the net charge-off rate rose to 7.89% as compared to 7.56% for the same period in 2009 as adjusted. This increase for the nine month period was largely attributable to a peak in the level of charge-offs during the first quarterFebruary 28, 2010.

~~The provision for loan losses declined in both the quarter-to-date and year-to-date periods ended August 31, 2010 as compared to August 31, 2009 as adjusted, which was primarily the result of a~~ A reduction in the loan loss reserve ~~rate. Additionally,~~rate and a decline in the ~~third quarter 2010, the~~level of net charge-offs led to a decline in the provision for loan losses ~~was also impacted by a decline~~for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 as compared to the same period in ~~the level of net charge-offs.~~2010. For a more detailed discussion on provision for loan losses, see “—Loan Quality—Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Other income ~~decreased in both periods~~increased slightly for the three months ended February 28, 2011 as compared to the ~~prior year as adjusted~~same period in 2010 primarily due to the inclusion of the purchase gain of approximately $16 million related to the acquisition of SLC (see Note 2: Business Combinations to our condensed consolidated financial statements). This was largely offset by a decline in late fees and the discontinuance of ~~overlimit~~over limit fees on consumer credit card loans beginning in February 2010 in connection with implementing the provisions of the CARD Act and lower late fees. This was partially offset by lower charge-offs of overlimit and late fees, a gain related to the liquidation of the collateral supporting our Golden Key investment (See Note 3: Investment Securities to our condensed consolidated financial statements) and higher discount and interchange revenue related to higher sales volume.2010.

~~In the third quarter 2010, other~~Other expenses increased from the third quarter 2009 as we increased investments in account acquisition and promotional marketing while continuing to increase our investment in advertising. However, total other expense declined for the ~~year-to-date period ending August 31, 2010~~three months ended February 28, 2011 as compared to the ~~comparable prior year~~same period ~~as the impact of the cost containment initiatives begun~~ in ~~2009, particularly those related~~2010 primarily due to ~~employee compensation~~increased marketing and ~~benefits~~advertising expenses and ~~information processing and communications, more than offset the impact of higher marketing expenses.~~costs relating to SLC. Additionally, the first quarter of 2010 benefited from a $29 million expense reversal related to ~~the~~an interest payment ~~to Morgan Stanley~~we made under an amendment to ~~the~~our special dividend agreement ~~while the second quarter 2009 included a $20 million restructuring charge related to a reduction in force.~~with Morgan Stanley.

Payment Services

Our Payment Services segment reported pretax income of ~~$37 million and $110~~$43 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31, 2010, respectively, which was 36% and 33% higher than~~February 28, 2011, up $6 million as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31, 2009, respectively, due to~~February 28, 2010. Revenues were up $11 million as a result of higher ~~revenues~~transaction volumes and ~~lower expenses. Higher revenues in both periods reflected increased volumes from new and existing clients, as well as~~ higher margins from transactions on the PULSE ~~network. Lower expenses in both periods were primarily~~network, partially offset by higher level of incentive payments. Expenses increased $5 million due to ~~transaction processing cost reduction initiatives as well as the inclusion of a number of significant Diners Club marketing initiatives in the third quarter 2009.~~higher technology investments and higher professional fees

Transaction dollar volume for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 was ~~$39~~$43 billion, ~~and $112 billion, respectively,~~ an increase of ~~8% and 4%~~21% compared to the ~~respective periods in 2009.~~three months ended February 28, 2010. The increase in transaction dollar volume was driven by ~~higher~~increased volumes from ~~all three contributors of our payments business. Additionally, the number of transactions processed on the PULSE Network from both~~ new and existing clients across all three of our payments businesses, particularly PULSE volume. The number of transactions on the PULSE network increased by ~~17% and 9%~~29% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31, 2010, respectively,~~February 28, 2011 as compared to ~~2009.~~the same period in 2010.

Critical Accounting Estimates

In preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with ~~GAAP,~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), management must make judgments and use estimates and assumptions about the effects of matters that are uncertain. For estimates that involve a high degree of judgment and subjectivity, it is possible that different estimates could reasonably be derived for the same period. For estimates that are particularly sensitive to changes in economic or market conditions, significant changes to the estimated amount from period to period are also possible. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and, in certain cases, could have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition. Management has identified the estimates related to our allowance for loan losses, the accrual of credit card customer rewards cost, the evaluation of goodwill and other nonamortizable intangible assets for potential impairment and the accrual of income taxes as critical accounting estimates.

These critical accounting estimates are discussed in greater detail in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, ~~2009.~~2010. That discussion can be found within “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the heading “Critical Accounting Estimates.” In the first quarter 2010, management enhanced its ability to estimate loan loss emergence, which results in the allowance for loan losses having approximately 12 months loss coverage. For additional information, see “—Loan Quality—Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.” Excluding the elimination of estimates related to assets that were derecognized or reclassified upon adoption of Statements No. 166 and 167 and the change in the estimate related to our allowance for loan losses, thereThere have not been any material changes in ~~our~~the methods used to formulate these critical accounting estimates from those discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, ~~2009.~~2010.

In the first quarter 2011, we determined the estimates related to our accounting for credit-impaired loans acquired from SLC to be critical. The estimate of expected future cash flows on purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans determines the amount of yield we can recognize in future periods and impacts whether a loan loss reserve must be established for these loans. We will reevaluate the amount and timing of expected cash flows regularly. Because estimates of expected future cash flows on PCI loans involve assumptions and significant judgment, it is reasonably possible that others could derive different estimates than ours for the same periods. In addition, changes in estimates from one period to the next can have a significant impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. A decrease in expected cash flows involving an increase in estimated credit losses would result in an immediate charge to earnings for the recognition of a loan loss provision. Increases or decreases in expected cash flows related solely to changes in estimated prepayments or to changes in variable interest rate indices would result in prospective yield adjustments over the remaining life of the loans. An increase in expected cash flows due to a reduction in expected credit losses would result first in the reversal of any previously established loan loss reserve on PCI loans through an immediate credit to earnings and then, if needed, a prospective adjustment to yield over the remaining life of the loans. The accounting and estimates used in our calculations are discussed further in Note 4: Loan Receivables to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Earnings Summary

The following table outlines changes in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

For the Three
Months Ended
August 31, 2010 vs. 2009
increase
(decrease) For the Nine
Months Ended
August 31, 2010 vs. 2009
increase
(decrease)
2010 2009
(As Adjusted¹) $ % 2010 2009
(As Adjusted¹) $ %
Interest income
$ 1,535,939 $ 1,660,787 $ (124,848 ) (8%)    $ 4,646,871 $ 4,858,710    $ (211,839 ) (4%)
Interest expense
389,137 382,238 6,899    2%    1,207,482 1,212,339    (4,857 ) 0%

Net interest income
1,146,802 1,278,549 (131,747 ) (10%)    3,439,389 3,646,371    (206,982 ) (6%)
Provision for loan losses
712,565 1,085,209 (372,644 ) (34%)    2,824,035 3,864,769    (1,040,734 ) (27%)

Net interest income after provision for loan losses
434,237 193,340 240,897    125 % 615,354 (218,398 ) 833,752    NM
Other income
564,144 575,717 (11,573 ) (2%)    1,622,864 1,635,835    (12,971 ) (1%)
Other expense
566,238 523,838 42,400    8%    1,554,590 1,643,589    (88,999 ) (5%)

Income (loss) before income tax expense
432,143 245,219 186,924    76 % 683,628 (226,152 ) 909,780    NM
Income tax expense (benefit)
171,526 94,655 76,871    81 % 268,482 (48,088 ) 316,570    NM

Net income (loss)
$ 260,617 $ 150,564 $ 110,053    73 % $ 415,146 $ (178,064 ) $ 593,210    NM

~~(1)~~

~~See “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”~~


	For the Three Months Ended February 28,					2011 vs. 2010 increase (decrease)
	2011		2010			$			%
Interest income	$	1,552,964	$	1,559,150		$	(6,186	)		0	%
Interest expense		382,728		413,724			(30,996	)		(7	)%

Net interest income		1,170,236		1,145,426			24,810			2	%
Provision for loan losses		417,709		1,387,206			(969,497	)		(70	)%

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		752,527		(241,780	)		994,307			NM
Other income		562,624		545,876			16,748			3	%
Other expense		595,148		474,804			120,344			25	%

Income (loss) before income tax expense		720,003		(170,708	)		890,711			NM
Income tax expense (benefit)		255,111		(67,170	)		322,281			NM

Net income (loss)	$	464,892	$	(103,538	)	$	568,430			NM

Net Interest Income

The tables that follow this section have been provided to supplement the discussion below and provide further analysis of net interest income, net interest margin and the impact of rate and volume changes on net interest income. Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred to finance those assets. We analyze net interest income in total by calculating net interest margin (interest income, net of interest expense, as a percentage of average total loan receivables). We also separately consider ~~(i)~~ the impact of the level of loan ~~receivables’~~receivables and the related interest yield and ~~(ii)~~ the impact of the cost of funds related to each of our funding ~~source’s cost of funds,~~sources, along with the income generated by our liquidity investment portfolio, on net interest income.

Our interest-earning assets consist of: (i) loan receivables, (ii) cash and cash equivalents, which includes amounts on deposit with the Federal Reserve, highly rated certificates of deposit, and triple-A rated government mutual funds, (iii) restricted cash, (iv) short-term investments and (v) investment securities. Our interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of deposits, both direct-to-consumer and brokered, and long-term borrowings, including amounts owed to securitization investors. Net interest income is influenced by the following:

The level and composition of loan receivables, including the proportion of credit card loans to other consumer loans, as well as the proportion of loan receivables bearing interest at promotional rates as compared to standard rates;

The credit performance of our loans, particularly with regard to charge-offs of finance charges, which reduce interest income;

The terms of long-term borrowings and certificates of deposit upon initial offering, including maturity and interest rate;

The level and composition of other interest-bearing assets and liabilities, including our liquidity investment portfolio;

Changes in the interest rate environment, including the levels of interest rates and the ~~relationship between~~relationships among interest rate indices, such as the prime rate, the ~~federal funds~~Federal Funds rate and LIBOR; and

The effectiveness of interest rate swaps in our interest rate risk management program.

~~For~~

Improvements in funding related costs partially offset by a slight decline in the ~~Three Months Ended August 31, 2010 and 2009~~

~~Net~~yield on loan receivables contributed to an increase in net interest income ~~was $1.1 billion for~~and the ~~three months ended August 31, 2010, a decline of 10%~~net interest margin in the first quarter 2011 as compared to the ~~three months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted. The decline in~~first quarter 2010. This, along with other factors affecting net interest income, ~~was primarily driven~~is discussed in further detail below.

Interest income on loan receivables decreased by ~~a decline~~$8 million in ~~net interest margin, as well as a lower level of loan receivables.~~

~~Net interest margin was 9.16% for~~ the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2010, down 79 basis points~~2011 as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2009~~2010, as ~~adjusted. This reflects~~a $75 million decline in interest income from credit card loans was offset by a $67 million increase in other consumer loans. The decline in interest income from credit card loans was largely the result of a decline in the level of credit card loan receivables. Additionally, the yield earned on credit card loan receivables declined slightly as a result of the impact of legislative changes during 2010 related to restrictions on imposing default interest rates on existing balances anand a higher payment rate. This was largely offset by improvements in the rate of interest charge-offs. The increase in ~~lower-rate~~interest income from other consumer loans reflects growth in our private student ~~loan balances~~loans as a ~~proportion~~result of ~~total loan receivables and higher funding costs.~~the SLC acquisition as well as growth in personal loans.

Interest expense declined $31 million in the first quarter 2011 as compared to the first quarter 2010. This was primarily due to a $49 million decline in interest expense on deposits as a result of a lower cost of funds on such borrowings. This was partially offset by ~~a reduction in promotional rate credit card balances and lower interest charge-offs.~~

~~Average loan receivables declined 2% driven by a $3.7 billion decline in average credit card loan receivables partially offset by~~ an $11 million increase in ~~student loan receivables. The decline in credit card loan receivables was driven by a reduction in promotional rate balances and an increase in the payment rate.~~

Funding costs increased in the third quarter 2010 as compared to the third quarter 2009 as adjusted. The increase is primarily due to a shift in our funding mix from securitized borrowings to higher-rate interest-bearing deposits and an increase in the funding cost ofinterest expense on other long-term borrowings, ~~related to subordinated debt issuances in November 200 and April 2010, partially offset by a year-over-year decline~~which were issued in the ~~funding costs~~second quarter of ~~interest-bearing deposits.~~

~~For the Nine Months Ended August 31,~~ 2010, and ~~2009~~a $7 million increase in interest expense on securitized borrowings. Although the level of securitized borrowings declined, the related interest expense increased because a substantial portion of the securitized borrowings that matured in 2010 had been issued at lower interest rates than the issuances that have not yet matured.

~~Net interest~~Interest income ~~was $3.4 billion for~~on other interest-earning assets, which largely relates to investment income on our liquidity investment portfolio, increased $2 million. Although the ~~nine months ended August 31, 2010, a decline of 6% as compared to the nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted. The decline in net interest income was primarily due to a lower~~ average level of ~~loan receivables as well~~our liquidity investment portfolio declined approximately $3 billion as a ~~decline~~result of funding securitization maturities in ~~net interest margin.~~

~~Net interest margin was 9.10% for~~2010, the nine months ended August 31, 2010, down 37 basis points as compared to the nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted. This reflects a higher mix of lower-rate student loans in our loan portfolio, lower ratesyield earned on our liquidity investment portfolio and higher interest rates on long-term borrowings issued since August 31, 2009, partially offset by lower deposit funding costs and an improvement in credit card yield. Yield on credit card loan receivables improved as a result of lower promotional rate balances, higher interest rates earned on standard balances and lower interest charge-offs, partially offset by the impact of legislative changes related to restrictions on imposing default interest rates on existing balances beginning in February 2010.

~~The level of net interest income also declined during the nine months ended August 31, 2010, as compared to the same period ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted, largely~~increased. This was due to a ~~decline~~shift in the ~~level~~mix of ~~credit card loan receivables, which was driven by a reduction in promotional rate balances and an increase~~our liquidity investment portfolio in the ~~payment rate. This was partially offset by an increase in~~fourth quarter of 2010 from cash on deposit with the ~~level of student loans and a~~Federal Reserve to higher ~~average level of liquidity.~~

~~Funding costs declined slightly in the year-to-date period ending August 31, 2010~~yielding investments, such as compared to the same period in 2009 largely as a result of a lower level of higher-rate securitized borrowings and lower deposit funding costs. This was partially offset by higher levels of deposits, which were used to replace a significant portionsecurities of the ~~asset-backed securities maturities,~~U.S. Treasury and ~~higher funding costs associated with subordinated debt issuances in November 2009 and April 2010.~~U.S. government agencies.

Average Balance Sheet Analysis

For the Three Months Ended August 31,
2010 2009 (As Adjusted¹)
Average
Balance Rate Interest Average
Balance Rate Interest
(dollars in thousands)
Assets

Interest-earning assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
$ 8,352,952    0.25 % $ 5,326 $ 9,349,825    0.27 % $ 6,283
Restricted cash
1,062,261    0.20 % 533 2,537,305    0.62 % 3,996
Other short-term investments
375,000    1.07 % 1,011 —      —      —
Investment securities
1,196,306    1.85 % 5,574 609,197    4.90 % 7,523
Loan receivables⁽²⁾:

Credit card⁽³⁾
44,905,220    12.86 % 1,455,907 48,628,788    13.05 % 1,599,588
Other⁽⁴⁾
4,782,080    5.61 % 67,588 2,329,166    7.39 % 43,397

Total loan receivables
49,687,300    12.16 % 1,523,495 50,957,954    12.79 % 1,642,985

Total interest-earning assets
60,673,819    10.04 % 1,535,939 63,454,281    10.38 % 1,660,787
Allowance for loan losses
(3,856,016 ) (3,754,592 )
Other assets
3,973,848    3,354,089

Total assets
$ 60,791,651    $ 63,053,778

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Interest-bearing deposits:

Time deposits⁽⁵⁾
$ 26,985,136    3.70 % 251,524 $ 25,094,285    4.32 % 273,510
Money market deposits
3,936,681    1.52 % 15,105 3,935,227    1.54 % 15,299
Other interest-bearing deposits
3,485,724    1.42 % 12,508 150,851    1.86 % 709

Total interest-bearing deposits⁽⁶⁾
34,407,541    3.22 % 279,137 29,180,363    3.94 % 289,518
Borrowings:

Short-term borrowings
—      —      —   16,304    0.24 % 10
Securitized borrowings
14,964,828    1.77 % 66,677 22,713,709    1.36 % 77,837
Other long-term borrowings
2,884,933    5.96 % 43,323 1,620,646    3.64 % 14,873

Total borrowings
17,849,761    2.44 % 110,000 24,350,659    1.51 % 92,720

Total interest-bearing liabilities
52,257,302    2.95 % 389,137 53,531,022    2.83 % 382,238
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity
8,534,349    9,522,756

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$ 60,791,651    $ 63,053,778

Net interest income
$ 1,146,802 $ 1,278,549

Net interest margin⁽⁷⁾
9.16 % 9.95 %
Net yield on interest-earning assets⁽⁸⁾
7.50 % 7.99 %
Interest rate spread⁽⁹⁾
7.09 % 7.55 %


	For the Nine Months Ended August 31,
	2010							2009 (As Adjusted¹)							For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	Average Balance			Rate		Interest		Average Balance			Rate		Interest		2011								2010
	(dollars in thousands)														Average Balance			Rate			Interest		Average Balance			Rate			Interest
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,528,297		0.25	%	$	20,018	$	8,517,733		0.70	%	$	44,604	$	4,224,045			0.24	%	$	2,539	$	12,207,100			0.26	%	$	7,962
Restricted cash		2,401,644		0.15	%		2,646		2,391,937		0.86	%		15,359		1,336,226			0.17	%		570		3,765,151			0.12	%		1,129
Other short-term investments		189,234		1.01	%		1,437		—		—			—		375,000			1.07	%		988		96,667			0.74	%		176
Investment securities		910,722		2.34	%		15,966		451,943		5.43	%		18,415		5,070,121			0.98	%		12,215		615,365			3.51	%		5,328
Loan receivables⁽²⁾:
Credit card⁽³⁾		45,931,331		12.83	%		4,423,654		49,315,952		12.59	%		4,661,061
Other⁽⁴⁾		4,413,788		5.53	%		183,150		1,995,097		7.96	%		119,271
Loan receivables⁽¹⁾:
Credit card⁽²⁾																45,442,626			12.65	%		1,417,116		47,646,479			12.70	%		1,491,887
Personal loans																1,941,372			11.71	%		56,055		1,426,327			11.27	%		39,631
Federal student loans⁽³⁾																780,176			1.55	%		2,986		1,717,776			0.80	%		3,382
Private student loans																3,309,633			7.40	%		60,398		697,204			5.18	%		8,909
Other																14,144			2.78	%		97		67,674			4.47	%		746

Total loan receivables		50,345,119		12.19	%		4,606,804		51,311,049		12.41	%		4,780,332		51,487,951			12.10	%		1,536,652		51,555,460			12.15	%		1,544,555

Total interest-earning assets		64,375,016		9.62	%		4,646,871		62,672,663		10.33	%		4,858,710		62,493,343			10.08	%		1,552,964		68,239,743			9.27	%		1,559,150
Allowance for loan losses		(3,967,079	)						(3,463,859	)						(3,263,819	)							(3,868,486	)
Other assets		4,004,750							3,103,599							3,880,381								3,970,914

Total assets	$	64,412,687						$	62,312,403						$	63,109,905							$	68,342,171

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits⁽⁵⁾	$	27,637,969		3.90	%		808,646	$	24,409,522		4.60	%		842,592
Time deposits⁽⁴⁾															$	25,529,818			3.59	%		226,299	$	27,884,527			4.14	%		284,701
Money market deposits		4,359,380		1.40	%		45,715		4,107,967		1.66	%		51,190		4,370,478			1.44	%		15,485		4,450,217			1.36	%		14,967
Other interest-bearing deposits		2,593,249		1.47	%		28,560		73,947		1.77	%		985		4,753,066			1.27	%		14,911		1,447,570			1.62	%		5,781

Total interest-bearing deposits⁽⁶⁾		34,590,598		3.40	%		882,921		28,591,436		4.17	%		894,767
Total interest-bearing deposits⁽⁵⁾																34,653,362			3.00	%		256,695		33,782,314			3.67	%		305,449
Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		—		—			—		1,115,584		0.30	%		2,538		93,828			0.20	%		46		—			—			—
Securitized borrowings		17,872,540		1.55	%		207,580		22,585,331		1.62	%		275,211		16,398,963			2.09	%		84,411		21,845,356			1.37	%		73,884
Other long-term borrowings		2,705,586		5.76	%		116,981		1,569,756		3.38	%		39,821
Other long-term borrowings⁽⁴⁾																2,518,365			6.70	%		41,576		2,414,901			5.78	%		34,391

Total borrowings		20,578,126		2.10	%		324,561		25,270,671		1.67	%		317,570		19,011,156			2.69	%		126,033		24,260,257			1.81	%		108,275

Total interest-bearing liabilities		55,168,724		2.92	%		1,207,482		53,862,107		3.00	%		1,212,337		53,664,518			2.89	%		382,728		58,042,571			2.89	%		413,724
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity		9,243,963							8,450,296							9,445,387								10,299,600

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	64,412,687						$	62,312,403						$	63,109,905							$	68,342,171

Net interest income						$	3,439,389						$	3,646,373							$	1,170,236							$	1,145,426

Net interest margin⁽⁷⁾				9.10	%						9.47	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets⁽⁸⁾				7.12	%						7.75	%
Interest rate spread⁽⁹⁾				6.70	%						7.33	%
Net interest margin⁽⁶⁾																			9.22	%							9.01	%
Net yield on interest-bearing assets⁽⁷⁾																			7.59	%							6.81	%
Interest rate spread⁽⁸⁾																			7.19	%							6.38	%

(1)

Information related to restricted cash, investment securities, credit card loan receivables, allowance for loan losses, other assets, securitized borrowings, other long-term borrowings and other liabilities and stockholders’ equity are presented on an as adjusted basis. No adjustments have been made for cash and cash equivalents, other short-term investments, other loan receivables, interest-bearing deposits, short-term borrowings and other long-term borrowings. See “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”

~~(2)~~

Average balances of loan receivables include non-accruing loans, ~~and these loans~~which are ~~therefore,~~ included in the yield calculations. If ~~these~~the non-accruing loan balances were excluded, there would not be a material impact on the amounts reported above.

~~(3)~~(2)

Interest income on credit card loans includes ~~$41~~$53.5 million and ~~$124~~$38.1 million of amortization of balance transfer fees for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and 2010, ~~respectively. Interest income on credit card loans includes $46 million and $156 million as adjusted of amortization of balance transfer fees for the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009,~~ respectively.

~~(4)~~(3)

Includes federal student loans held for sale.

~~(5)~~(4)

Includes the impact of interest rate swap agreements used to change a portion of fixed-rate funding to floating-rate funding.

~~(6)~~(5)

Includes the impact of FDIC insurance premiums and special assessments.

~~(7)~~(6)

Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average total loan receivables.

~~(8)~~(7)

Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average total interest-earning assets.

~~(9)~~(8)

Interest rate spread represents the difference between the rate on total interest-earning assets and the rate on total interest-bearing liabilities.

Rate/Volume Variance Analysis⁽¹⁾


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2010 vs. August 31, 2009									For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2010 vs. August 31, 2009									For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2011 vs. February 28, 2010
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease) due to changes in:
Increase/(decrease) in net interest income due to changes in:
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	(647	)	$	(310	)	$	(957	)	$	13,818		$	(38,404	)	$	(24,586	)	$	(4,842	)	$	(581	)	$	(5,423	)
Restricted cash		(1,594	)		(1,869	)		(3,463	)		103			(12,816	)		(12,713	)		(2,676	)		2,117			(559	)
Other short-term investments		1,011			—			1,011			1,437			—			1,437			703			109			812
Investment securities		21,397			(23,346	)		(1,949	)		16,335			(18,784	)		(2,449	)		34,625			(27,738	)		6,887
Loan receivables:
Credit cards		(121,002	)		(22,679	)		(143,681	)		(370,729	)		133,322			(237,407	)
Credit card																				(68,749	)		(6,022	)		(74,771	)
Personal loans																				14,817			1,607			16,424
Federal student loans																				(9,634	)		9,238			(396	)
Private student loans																				46,209			5,280			51,489
Other		87,311			(63,120	)		24,191			128,627			(64,748	)		63,879			(438	)		(211	)		(649	)

Total loan receivables		(33,691	)		(85,799	)		(119,490	)		(242,102	)		68,574			(173,528	)		(17,795	)		9,892			(7,903	)
																										��
Total interest income		(13,524	)		(111,324	)		(124,848	)		(210,409	)		(1,430	)		(211,839	)		10,015			(16,201	)		(6,186	)
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits		100,039			(122,025	)		(21,986	)		143,181			(177,127	)		(33,946	)		(22,804	)		(35,598	)		(58,402	)
Money market deposits		38			(232	)		(194	)		4,496			(9,972	)		(5,476	)		(1,500	)		2,018			518
Other interest-bearing deposits		12,990			(1,191	)		11,799			27,888			(312	)		27,576			17,539			(8,409	)		9,130

Total interest-bearing deposits		113,067			(123,448	)		(10,381	)		175,565			(187,411	)		(11,846	)		(6,765	)		(41,989	)		(48,754	)
Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		(10	)		—			(10	)		(2,538	)		—			(2,538	)		46			0			46
Securitized borrowings		(104,559	)		93,399			(11,160	)		(55,230	)		(12,401	)		(67,631	)		(97,707	)		108,234			10,527
Other long-term borrowings		15,669			12,781			28,450			39,096			38,064			77,160			1,523			5,662			7,185

Total borrowings		(88,900	)		106,180			17,280			(18,672	)		25,663			6,991			(96,138	)		113,896			17,758

Total interest expense		24,167			(17,268	)		6,899			156,893			(161,748	)		(4,855	)		(102,903	)		71,907			(30,996	)

Net interest income	$	(37,691	)	$	(94,056	)	$	(131,747	)	$	(367,302	)	$	160,318		$	(206,984	)	$	112,918		$	(88,108	)	$	24,810

(1)

The rate/volume variance for each category has been allocated on a consistent basis between rate and volume variances between ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and February 28, 2010 ~~and August 31, 2009 as adjusted~~ based on the percentage of the rate or volume variance to the sum of the two absolute variances. ~~Calculation of rate/volume variance is based on August 31, 2009 amounts as adjusted.~~

Loan Quality

Loan receivables consist of the following (dollars in thousands):


	August 31, 2010			November 30, 2009			February 28, 2011			November 30, 2010
				(As Adjusted¹)
Student loans held for sale	$	1,437,592		$	—
Loans held for sale							$	766,661		$	788,101
Loan portfolio:
Credit card loans:
Discover card		44,930,267			47,055,215
Discover business card		317,899			404,149
Discover Card								44,081,251			44,904,267
Discover Business Card								235,996			252,727

Total credit card loans		45,248,166			47,459,364			44,317,247			45,156,994
Other consumer loans:
Personal loans		1,706,873			1,394,379			2,019,749			1,877,633
Federal student loans		809,055			1,352,587
Private student loans		880,854			579,679			1,534,104			999,322
Other		48,124			68,137			14,083			14,363

Total other consumer loans		3,444,906			3,394,782			3,567,936			2,891,318
PCI student loans⁽¹⁾								3,011,384			0

Total loan portfolio		48,693,072			50,854,146			50,896,567			48,048,312

Total loan receivables		50,130,664			50,854,146			51,663,228			48,836,413
Allowance for loan losses		(3,743,721	)		(3,902,360	)		(3,033,459	)		(3,304,118	)

Net loan receivables	$	46,386,943		$	46,951,786		$	48,629,769		$	45,532,295

(1)

~~Discover card loan balances and the~~Represents purchased credit-impaired private student loans acquired from SLC on December 31, 2010 which do not have a related allowance for loan losses ~~are presented on an as adjusted basis. No adjustments have been made~~or charge-offs (see Note 4: Loan Receivables to ~~student loans held for sale, Discover business card, personal loans, federal or private student loans or other loans. See reconciliation in “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”~~our condensed consolidated financial statements).

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

Provision for loan losses is the expense related to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level ~~management believes is~~ adequate to absorb the estimated probable losses in the loan portfolio at each period end date. Factors that influence the provision for loan losses include:

The impact of general economic conditions on the consumer, including unemployment levels, bankruptcy trends and interest rate movements;

Changes in consumer spending and payment behaviors;

Changes in our loan portfolio, including the overall mix of accounts, products and loan balances within the portfolio;

The level and direction of historical and anticipated loan delinquencies and charge-offs;

The credit quality of the loan portfolio, which reflects, among other factors, our credit granting practices and ~~the~~ effectiveness of ~~our~~ collection efforts; and

Regulatory changes or new regulatory guidance.

In calculating the allowance for loan losses, we estimate probable losses separately for segments of the loan portfolio that have similar risk characteristics, such as credit card and other consumer loans. For our credit card loans, we use a migration analysis to ~~determine~~estimate the likelihood that a loan ~~receivable~~ will progress through the various stages of ~~delinquency and eventually charge-off. In the first quarter 2010, we developed analytics which provide us with a better understanding of the likelihood that~~delinquency. We use other analyses to estimate losses incurred from non-delinquent accounts ~~will eventually charge-off, thus broadening~~which broadens the identification of loss emergence. We use ~~this in combination with the migration analysis~~these analyses together to determine our allowance for loan losses.

~~For~~During the ~~three and nine months ended August 31, 2010,~~first quarter 2011, the provision for loan losses decreased ~~$373~~by $969 million, ~~and $1.0 billion,~~ or ~~34% and 27% respectively,~~70%, as compared to the ~~three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted.~~first quarter 2010. This decrease is ~~attributable~~primarily due to improved credit performance, reflecting ~~the~~a decline in

the level of net charge-offs induring the ~~second and third quarters~~first quarter of ~~2010 subsequent to~~2011. Delinquencies also improved during the quarter, which favorably impacted our outlook for credit performance over the next twelve months. As a ~~peak in the level of net charge-offs~~result, we reduced our allowance for loan losses by $271 million in the first quarter of 2010. Improvements in credit performance were also evidenced by a decline in the delinquency rate in each quarter of 2010 as compared to November 30, 2009, as adjusted, which was the primary driver of the reduction in the2011. By comparison, we increased our allowance for loan losses ~~during both the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010.~~

For our other consumer loans, we consider historical and forecasted losses in estimating the related allowance for loan losses. At August 31, 2010, the level of the allowance related to other consumer loans decreased $14by $305 million ~~as compared to November 30, 2009 largely due to a decline~~ in the ~~personal loan reserve rate related~~first quarter 2010 upon management’s refined analytics that expanded its ability to ~~credit improvement in that portfolio.~~identify loss emergence.

The following table provides changes in our allowance for loan losses for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,						For the Nine Months Ended August 31,						For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2010			2009 (As Adjusted¹)			2010			2009 (As Adjusted¹)			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period, as adjusted	$	3,930,624		$	3,700,901		$	3,902,360		$	2,754,357
Balance at beginning of period													$	3,304,118		$	1,757,899
Additions:
Addition to allowance related to securitized receivables⁽¹⁾														0			2,144,461
Provision for loan losses		712,565			1,085,209			2,824,035			3,864,769			417,709			1,387,206
Deductions:
Charge-offs:
Discover card		(982,920	)		(1,139,338	)		(3,203,959	)		(3,117,183	)		(792,632	)		(1,140,485	)
Discover business card		(14,502	)		(18,400	)		(50,190	)		(43,671	)		(7,386	)		(19,286	)

Total credit card loans		(997,422	)		(1,157,738	)		(3,254,149	)		(3,160,854	)		(800,018	)		(1,159,771	)
Personal loans		(23,836	)		(20,920	)		(70,957	)		(46,186	)		(20,050	)		(24,080	)
Federal student loans		(11	)		—			(308	)		—			0			(49	)
Private student loans		(660	)		(259	)		(1,264	)		(355	)		(939	)		(344	)
Other		(139	)		—			(858	)		(18	)		(35	)		(8	)

Total other consumer loans		(24,646	)		(21,179	)		(73,387	)		(46,559	)		(21,024	)		(24,481	)

Total charge-offs		(1,022,068	)		(1,178,917	)		(3,327,536	)		(3,207,413	)		(821,042	)		(1,184,252	)
Recoveries:
Discover card		121,255			99,853			341,337			294,607			131,389			101,121
Discover business card		875			272			2,516			602			853			730

Total credit card loans		122,130			100,125			343,853			295,209			132,242			101,851
Personal loans		421			231			942			615			416			191
Federal student loans		—			—			—			—
Private student loans		14			—			22			—			15			2
Other		35			22			45			34			1			2

Total other consumer loans		470			253			1,009			649			432			195

Total recoveries		122,600			100,378			344,862			295,858			132,674			102,046

Net charge-offs		(899,468	)		(1,078,539	)		(2,982,674	)		(2,911,555	)		(688,368	)		(1,082,206	)

Balance at end of period	$	3,743,721		$	3,707,571		$	3,743,721		$	3,707,571		$	3,033,459		$	4,207,360

(1)

~~Information~~On December 1, 2009, upon adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statements No. 166 and 167, the Company recorded $2.1 billion allowance for loan losses related to ~~Discover~~newly consolidated and reclassified credit card and total loans is presented on an as adjusted basis. No adjustments have been made for Discover business card, personal loans, federal or private student loans or other loans. See reconciliation in “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”loan receivables.

The following table presents a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):

   August 31, 2010    November 30, 2009
      (As Adjusted¹)
Discover card
   $ 3,598,685    $ 3,731,568
Discover business card
   48,285    59,979

Total credit card loans
   3,646,970    3,791,547
Personal loans
   80,171    95,056
Federal student loans
   1,054    968
Private student loans
   14,699    13,734
Other
   827    1,055

Total other consumer loans
   96,751    110,813

Total allowance for loan losses
   $ 3,743,721    $ 3,902,360

~~(1)~~

Information related to Discover card, credit card and total loan receivables is presented on an as adjusted basis. No adjustments have been made for Discover business card, personal loans, federal or private student loans or other loans. See reconciliation in “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”


	February 28, 2011		November 30, 2010
Discover card	$	2,918,962	$	3,182,603
Discover business card		19,884		26,285

Total credit card loans		2,938,846		3,208,888
Personal loans		74,379		76,087
Private student loans		19,153		18,569
Other		1,081		574

Total other consumer loans		94,613		95,230

Total allowance for loan losses	$	3,033,459	$	3,304,118

Net Charge-offs

Our net charge-offs include the principal amount of losses charged-off less principal recoveries and exclude charged-off interest and fees, recoveries of interest and fees and fraud losses. Charged-off and recovered interest and fees are recorded in interest and loan fee income, respectively, for loan receivables while fraud losses are recorded in other expense. Credit card loan receivables are charged-off at the end of the month during which an account becomes 180 days contractually past due. Closed-end consumer loan receivables are charged-off at the end of the month during which an account becomes 120 days contractually past ~~due, except for student loans that are guaranteed by the federal government.~~due. Generally, customer bankruptcies and probate accounts are charged-off at the end of the month 60 days following the receipt of notification of the bankruptcy or death but not later than the 180-day or 120-day contractual time frame.

The following table presents amounts and rates of net charge-offs of key loan ~~receivables~~portfolio segments (dollars in thousands):

   For the Three Months Ended
August 31, For the Nine Months Ended
August 31,
   2010 2009
(As Adjusted¹) 2010 2009
(As Adjusted¹)
   $    % $    % $    % $    %
Credit card loans
   $ 875,292    7.73 % $ 1,057,613    8.63 % $ 2,910,296    8.44 % $ 2,865,645    7.74 %
Other consumer loans
   24,176    2.01 % 20,926    3.56 % 72,378    2.18 % 45,910    3.07 %

Total net charge-offs
   $ 899,468    7.18 % $ 1,078,539    8.40 % $ 2,982,674    7.89 % $ 2,911,555    7.56 %


	For the Three Months Ended February 28,
	2011					2010
	$		%			$		%
Credit card loans	$	667,776		5.96	%	$	1,057,920		9.00	%
Personal loans	$	19,634		4.10	%	$	23,889		6.79	%
Private student loans (excluding PCI⁽¹⁾)	$	924		0.29	%	$	342		0.20	%

(1)

~~Information related~~Charge-offs for PCI loans did not result in a charge to ~~credit card loan receivables~~earnings in the first quarter 2011 and ~~total loan receivables is presented~~are therefore excluded from the calculation. See Note 4: Loan Receivables to our condensed consolidated financial statements for more information regarding the accounting for charge-offs on ~~an as adjusted basis. No adjustments have been made for other consumer loan receivables. See reconciliation in “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”~~PCI loans.

The ~~amount and~~net charge-off rate ~~of net charge-offs declined in~~on our credit card loan receivables decreased 304 basis points for the ~~third quarter 2010~~three months ended February 28, 2011, as compared to the ~~third quarter 2009 as adjusted as the credit performance of our portfolio continued to improve. However, the amount and rate of~~three months ended February 28, 2010. The decrease in net charge-offs ~~increased for the nine months ended August 31, 2010 as compared~~was attributable to ~~the nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted, largely due~~improvement in both contractual and bankruptcy related charge-offs subsequent to a peak in the level of charge-offs in the first quarter of 2010.

The charge-off rate for other consumer loans declined during the three and nine months ended 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009 due to an increase in the level of student loans, which have not yet entered into repayment and, thus, have minimal levels of net charge-offs. This was partially offset by the seasoning of our personal loan products which has led to a higher level of net charge-offs for those loans.

Delinquencies

Delinquencies are an indicator of credit quality at a point in time. Loan balances are considered delinquent when contractual payments on the loan become 30 days past due. ~~Credit card and closed-end consumer loan receivables are placed~~Information related to loans on nonaccrual status ~~upon receipt of notification of the bankruptcy~~and loans 90 days or ~~death of a customer, suspected fraudulent activity on an account, as part of certain collection management processes,~~more delinquent and ~~other instances in which management feels collectability is not assured. In some cases of suspected fraudulent activity, loan receivables may resume~~ accruing interest ~~upon completion of the fraud investigation.~~is provided in Note 4: Loan Receivables to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following table presents the amounts and delinquency rates of key loan ~~receivables over~~portfolio segments that are 30 ~~days past due, loan receivables over~~and 90 days or more delinquent ~~and accruing interest and loan receivables that are not accruing interest, regardless of delinquency~~ (dollars in thousands):

   August 31,
2010 November 30,
2009
      (As Adjusted¹)
   $    % $    %
Loans over 30 days delinquent
   $ 2,083,128    4.16 % $ 2,700,959    5.31 %
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest
   $ 928,521    1.85 % $ 1,217,054    2.39 %
Loans not accruing interest
   $ 374,836    0.75 % $ 438,278    0.86 %


	February 28, 2011					November 30, 2010
	$		%			$		%
Loans 30 days delinquent or more:
Credit card loans	$	1,589,891		3.59	%	$	1,831,119		4.06	%
Private student loans (excluding PCI⁽¹⁾)	$	11,081		0.72	%	$	5,030		0.50	%
Personal loans	$	24,304		1.20	%	$	29,486		1.57	%
Loans 90 days delinquent or more:
Credit card loans	$	882,390		1.99	%	$	958,216		2.12	%
Private student loans (excluding PCI⁽¹⁾)	$	1,697		0.11	%	$	1,408		0.14	%
Personal loans	$	8,643		0.43	%	$	10,670		0.57	%

(1)

~~See “—Reconciliation~~Excludes PCI loans that were acquired as part of ~~GAAP~~the SLC transaction which are accounted for on a pooled basis. Since a pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and aggregate expectation of cash flows, the past-due status of a pool, or that of the individual loans within a pool, is not meaningful. Because we are recognizing interest income on a pool of loans, it is all considered to ~~As Adjusted Data.”~~be performing.

Delinquency rates ~~as of August 31, 2010~~at February 28, 2011 have declined as compared to November 30, ~~2009 as adjusted~~2010 due to ~~better~~continued improvement in credit trends, ~~that led to an improvement~~which has resulted in improvements in early delinquency balances, as well as enhanced collection management and underwriting processes.

Modified Loans.We have programs that provide for temporary hardship and ~~Restructured Loans~~

~~We hold various~~permanent workout programs for our credit card ~~loans for which the terms have been modified, including some that are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings. Our modified credit card loans include loans for which~~loans. The temporary hardship concessions have been granted and loans in permanent workout programs. Eligibility, frequency, duration and offer type for both of these programs are offered in compliance with stated regulatory guidelines.

~~Temporary hardship concessions~~program primarily ~~consist~~consists of a reduced minimum payment and an interest rate reduction, both lasting for a period no longer than twelve months. These short term concessions do not include the forgiveness of unpaid principal, but may involve the reversal of certain unpaid interest or fee assessments. At the end of the concession period, loan terms revert to standard rates. These arrangements are automatically terminated if the customer makes two consecutive late payments, at which time their account reverts back to its original terms. In assessing the appropriate allowance for loan loss, these loans are included in the general pool of credit cards with the allowance determined under the contingent loss model of ASC 450-20,~~Loss Contingencies~~ ~~(guidance formerly contained in FASB Statement No. 5). We do not consider these loans in the troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) pool. If we applied accounting under ASC 310-40~~~~, Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors~~ (guidance formerly contained in FASB Statement No. 114), to loans in this program, there would not be a material difference in the allowance. Loans for which temporary hardship concessions were granted comprised less than 1% of our total credit card loans at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.

~~In contrast to temporary hardship concessions, our~~The permanent workout ~~programs entail more significant and permanent concessions including~~program involves changing the structure of the loan to a fixed payment loan with a maturity no longer than 60 ~~months. The concessions associated with a permanent workout also include a significant reduction in~~months and reducing the interest rate ~~and possible waivers~~on the loan. These programs do not normally provide for the forgiveness of unpaid principal, but may allow for the reversal of certain unpaid interest ~~and fees.~~or fee assessments. We ~~account~~also make loan modifications for ~~permanent workout loans as TDRs and,~~customers who request financial assistance through external sources, such as a result, we measure impairment of these loans based on the discounted present value of cash flows expected to be received on them. Loans in permanent workout programs comprised less than 1% of our total credit card loans at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.

~~We also participate with~~ consumer credit counseling agency (“CCCA”) ~~programs in an effort~~program (referred to assist customers to proactively manage their credit card balances. The vast majority of loans entering CCCA programs are not delinquent at the time of enrollment, and our charge-off rate on these loans is comparable or less than the rate on our overall credit card receivables portfolio.below as external programs). These loans continue to ~~meet~~be subject to the original minimum payment terms and do not normally include waiver of unpaid principal, interest or fees. ~~In assessing~~For additional information regarding the ~~appropriate allowance~~accounting treatment for ~~loan loss,~~ these loans ~~are included~~as well as amounts recorded in the ~~general pool of credit card loans with the allowance determined under the contingent loss model. We do not consider~~financial statements related to these loans, ~~in the TDR pool. If we applied TDR accounting~~see Note 4: Loan Receivables to ~~loans in this program, there would not be a material difference in the allowance. Credit card loans modified under CCCA programs comprised approximately 1.7% of~~ our ~~total credit card loans at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009.~~condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other Income

The following table presents the components of other income for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,					2010 vs. 2009 increase (decrease)				For the Nine Months Ended August 31,					2010 vs. 2009 increase (decrease)				For the Three Months Ended February 28,				2011 vs. 2010 increase (decrease)
	2010		2009 (As Adjusted¹)			$			%	2010		2009 (As Adjusted¹)			$			%	2011		2010		$			%
Discount and interchange revenue⁽²⁾⁽¹⁾	$	273,932	$	259,524		$	14,408		6%	$	805,209	$	737,386		$	67,823		9%	$	260,916	$	261,991	$	(1,075	)		0	%
Fee products		104,132		105,399			(1,267	)	(1%)		309,590		305,701			3,889		1%		108,553		104,095		4,458			4	%
Loan fee income		92,465		140,333			(47,868	)	(34%)		267,483		369,474			(101,991	)	(28%)		85,600		105,285		(19,685	)		(19	)%
Transaction processing revenue		40,184		31,839			8,345		26%		109,570		93,309			16,261		17%		42,551		32,918		9,633			29	%
Merchant fees		7,220		10,716			(3,496	)	(33%)		23,091		35,289			(12,198	)	(35%)		4,655		8,445		(3,790	)		(45	)%
Gain (loss) on investments		18,951		(7,422	)		26,373		NM		19,131		(9,239	)		28,370		NM
Gain (loss) on investment securities																				141		180		(39	)		(22	)%
Other income		27,260		35,328			(8,068	)	(23%)		88,790		103,915			(15,125	)	(15%)		60,208		32,962		27,246			83	%

Total other income	$	564,144	$	575,717		$	(11,573	)	(2%)	$	1,622,864	$	1,635,835		$	(12,971	)	(1%)	$	562,624	$	545,876	$	16,748			3	%

(1)	~~See “—Reconciliation of GAAP to As Adjusted Data.”~~

~~(2)~~

Net of rewards, includingCashback Bonus rewards, of ~~$194~~$207 million and ~~$174~~$167 million for the three months ended ~~August 31,~~February 28, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009, respectively, and $535 million and $499 million for the nine months ended August 31, 2010 and 2009,~~ respectively.

Total other income ~~decreased in~~increased $17 million during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~August 31, 2009~~February 28, 2010 primarily due to the inclusion of the purchase gain of approximately $16 million related to the acquisition of SLC (see Note 2: Business Combinations to our condensed consolidated financial statements), as ~~adjusted~~well as income from SLC transition service agreements, each of which is included in other income, and an increase in transaction processing revenue primarily related to PULSE. These were partially offset by lower loan fees and lower other income were largely offset by higher revenues from discount and interchange, transaction processing revenues and a $19.6 million gain relating to the liquidation of collateral supporting the asset-backed commercial paper notes of Golden Key. The investment was originally purchased in 2007 for $120.1 million, subsequently written down to $51.3 million and, in August 2010, liquidated for $70.9 million. In contrast, during the third quarter 2009, we recorded a $7.4 million other than temporary impairment on the Golden Key investment.

~~Loan~~ fee income, ~~consists primarily of fees on credit card loans and includes late, overlimit, cash advance, pay-by-phone and other miscellaneous fees. However, effective February 2010, as a~~which was the result of ~~legislative changes, we no longer charge~~lower late fees earned in connection with implementing the provisions of the CARD Act and the discontinuance of overlimit ~~or pay-by-phone~~ fees on consumer credit card loans. Furthermore, the legislative changes also resulted in changes to our late fee policy, which resulted in lower late fees. These factors contributed to the decline in loan fee income in 2010 as compared to 2009 as adjusted. Additionally, lower gains on sales of merchant portfolios resulted in a decrease in other income for both the three and nine months ended August 31, 2010, as compared to the three and nine months ended August 31, 2009 as adjusted.

Discount and interchange revenue ~~includes discount revenue and acquirer interchange net of interchange paid to third-party issuers and is further reduced by the cost of rewards programs offered to our customers. We had~~was essentially flat as higher sales volume ~~in each of the quarters of 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009 which~~

contributed to the increase in discount and interchange revenue. We also had higher dollar and transaction volumes in our Payments Services segment which, along with higher margins at PULSE, resulted inwas offset by an increase in ~~transaction processing revenue.~~Cashback Bonus rewards earned by our customers.

Other Expense

The following table represents the components of other expense for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,				2010 vs. 2009 increase (decrease)					For the Nine Months Ended August 31,				2010 vs. 2009 increase (decrease)					For the Three Months Ended February 28,				2011 vs. 2010 increase (decrease)
	2010		2009		$			%		2010		2009		$			%		2011		2010		$			%
Employee compensation and benefits	$	204,210	$	208,528	$	(4,318	)	(2%	)	$	602,510	$	636,167	$	(33,657	)	(5%	)	$	213,075	$	195,764	$	17,311			9	%
Marketing and business development		130,532		77,814		52,718		68%			313,175		292,169		21,006		7%			135,665		84,673		50,992			60	%
Information processing and communications		62,357		67,679		(5,322	)	(8%	)		190,862		217,017		(26,155	)	(12%	)		64,717		65,418		(701	)		(1	)%
Professional fees		85,289		83,746		1,543		2%			239,169		228,419		10,750		5%			90,331		75,813		14,518			19	%
Premises and equipment		17,722		18,437		(715	)	(4%	)		53,273		54,732		(1,459	)	(3%	)		17,248		17,860		(612	)		(3	)%
Other expense		66,128		67,634		(1,506	)	(2%	)		155,601		215,085		(59,484	)	(28%	)		74,112		35,276		38,836			110	%

Total other expense	$	566,238	$	523,838	$	42,400		8%		$	1,554,590	$	1,643,589	$	(88,999	)	(5%	)	$	595,148	$	474,804	$	120,344			25	%

For the three months ended ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, total other expense increased $120 million as compared to the three months ended February 28, 2010 primarily due to increased advertising and new account acquisition expenses. There was also an increase in professional fees primarily relating to higher ~~than~~collection fees during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the same ~~prior year~~ period ~~largely due~~in 2010. Additionally, the acquisition of SLC contributed to an increase in marketing expenses, primarily attributable to increased investment in account acquisition, advertising and promotional marketing expenses during the third quarter of 2010. This increase was partially offset by lower employee compensation, and benefits due to cost containment initiatives undertaken in 2009, and decreased information processing and communications expenses due to our efforts to reduce costs associated with ongoing contracts.

For the nine months ended August 31, 2010, total other expense was lower than the same prior year period. This is attributable to lower employee compensation and benefit expense, information processing and communication expenseprofessional fees and other ~~expense, partially offset by a continued increase in marketing expense over the course of 2010. Employee compensation and benefits expense decreased as we continued~~expenses related to benefit from cost containment initiatives undertaken in 2009, which included lowering headcount. Information processing and communications expense was lower in 2010 than in 2009 due to our efforts to reduce costs associated with ongoing contracts, which most significantly impacted the first half of 2010. Also contributing to the decline in othertransitional service agreements. Other expense in the ~~nine months ended August 31,~~first quarter of 2010 ~~was: (i) a $20 million restructuring charge recorded during the second quarter 2009 as a result of the reduction in headcount discussed above and (ii)~~benefited from a $29 million ~~nonrecurring benefit related to the~~expense reversal ~~expense that had been recorded in the fourth quarter 2009~~ related to the payment to Morgan Stanley under an amendment to the special dividend ~~agreement (see Note 14: Litigation to our condensed consolidated financial statements).~~agreement.

Income Tax Expense

~~For~~Income tax expense increased $322 million for the ~~three and nine months ended August 31, 2010, our effective tax rate was 39.7% and 39.3%, respectively,~~first quarter 2011 as compared to ~~an effective tax rate~~the first quarter 2010, as a result of ~~38.6% and 21.3% for~~ the ~~three and nine months ended August 31, 2009, respectively. The~~ increase in pretax income, partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax ~~rate, including the~~rate. The effective ~~state~~ tax rate decreased to 35.4% in the first quarter 2011 from 39.3% for the ~~nine months ended August 31,~~first quarter 2010 as ~~compared to 2009 was the~~a result of ~~shifting from an as adjusted pretax loss position in 2009, where~~the settlement of certain state ~~gross receipt taxes have~~examination issues and receiving confirmation of a ~~disproportionate effect on the expected year-end tax rate, to a pretax income position in 2010, where state gross receipt taxes had a smaller impact on the expected~~

~~year-end tax rate. The nine months ended August 31, 2009 also included the impact of recording a valuation allowance~~state’s treatment on a previously uncertain tax ~~benefit arising from the sale of the Goldfish business in 2008 that we no longer believed was realizable, as well as non-deductible stock-based compensation expense recorded in March 2009.~~position.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Funding and Liquidity

We seek to maintain diversified funding sources and a strong liquidity profile in order to fund our business and ~~service~~repay or refinance our maturing obligations. In addition, we seek to achieve an appropriate maturity profile and utilize a cost-effective mix of ~~both long-term and short-term~~ funding ~~sources and ensure that the composition of our funding sources provides appropriate diversification.~~sources. Our primary funding sources include deposits, sourced directly from consumers or through brokers, term asset-backed securitizations, private asset-backed ~~conduit financing~~securitizations and long-term borrowings.

Funding Sources

Deposits.~~Since 2009, deposits have become our largest source of funding.~~ We offer deposit products, including certificates of deposit, money market accounts, online savings accounts and Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) certificates of deposit, to customers through two channels: (i) through direct marketing, internet origination and affinity relationships (“direct-to-consumer deposits”); and (ii) indirectly through contractual arrangements with securities brokerage firms (“brokered deposits”).

At February 28, 2011, we had $21.8 billion of direct-to-consumer deposits and $12.9 billion of brokered deposits. Since November 30, 2009, ~~direct-to-consumer deposits~~we have ~~grown $6.5 billion, or 52%, which includes approximately $1 billion~~deemphasized the brokered deposit channel in favor of ~~deposit accounts acquired in March 2010. At August 31, 2010, we had $15.1 billion of brokered deposits, which decreased $4.4 billion, or 23%, since November 30, 2009 as a result of growing~~ our direct-to-consumer deposit program. Maturities of our certificates of deposit range from one month to ten years, with a weighted average maturity of 2221 months at ~~August 31, 2010.~~

February 28, 2011. The following table summarizes deposits by contractual maturity as of ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 (dollars in thousands):


	Total		Three Months or Less		Over Three Months Through Six Months		Over Six Months Through Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months		Total		Three Months or Less		Over Three Months Through Six Months		Over Six Months Through Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
Certificates of deposit in amounts less than $100,000⁽¹⁾	$	20,864,065	$	1,979,764	$	1,355,137	$	4,002,978	$	13,526,186	$	19,329,927	$	2,042,520	$	2,041,793	$	3,403,904	$	11,841,710
Certificates of deposit from amounts of $100,000⁽¹⁾to less than $250,000⁽¹⁾		4,358,026		589,648		546,870		1,068,569		2,152,939
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 to less than $250,000⁽¹⁾												4,765,285		466,485		700,805		1,249,368		2,348,627
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $250,000⁽¹⁾ or greater		1,163,140		225,298		175,685		306,624		455,533		1,152,040		141,366		210,659		348,486		451,529
Savings deposits, including money market deposit accounts		7,763,701		7,763,701		—		—		—		9,481,077		9,481,077		0		0		0

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	34,148,932	$	10,558,411	$	2,077,692	$	5,378,171	$	16,134,658	$	34,728,329	$	12,131,448	$	2,953,257	$	5,001,758	$	14,641,866

(1)	$100,000 represents the basic insurance amount previously covered by the ~~FDIC although, effective~~FDIC. Effective July 21, 2010, the basic insurance per depositor was permanently increased to $250,000.

Credit Card Securitization Financing.We use the securitization of credit card receivables as an additional source of funding. We access the asset-backed securitization market using the Discover Card Master Trust I (“DCMT”) and the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“DCENT”), through which we issue asset-backed securities both publicly and through ~~privately placed asset-backed conduit facilities, which may be fully or partially undrawn at closing.~~private transactions.

The DCMT structure utilizes Class A and Class B certificates held by third parties, with credit enhancement provided by the subordinated Class B certificates, cash collateral ~~account loans~~accounts and ~~the more~~ subordinated Series 2009-CE. The DCENT ~~consists of~~structure utilizes four classes of securities with declining levels of seniority (Class A, B, C and D), with credit enhancement provided by the more subordinated classes of notes. Both DCMT and DCENT are further enhanced by Series 2009-SD through its provisions to reallocate principal cash flows, thereby enhancing the excess spread, discussed below, of both trusts. We retain significant exposure to the performance of trust assets through holdings of subordinated security classes of DCMT and DCENT.

The securitization structures include certain features designed to protect investors. The primary feature relates to the availability and adequacy of cash flows in the securitized pool of receivables to meet contractual requirements, the insufficiency of which triggers early repayment of the securities. We refer to this as “economic early amortization,” which is based on excess spread levels. Excess spread is the amount by which income received by a trust during a collection period, including interest collections, fees and interchange, as well as the amount of certain principal collections available to be reallocated from Series 2009-SD exceeds the fees and expenses of the trust during such collection period, including interest expense, servicing fees and charged-off receivables. In the event of an economic early amortization, which would occur if the excess spread ~~falls~~fell below 0% for a contractually specified period, generally a three-month rolling average, we would be required to repay

the affected outstanding securitized borrowings over a period of ~~a few~~ months using all available collections received by the ~~trust.~~trust (the period of ultimate repayment would be determined by the amount and timing of collections received). An early amortization event would negatively impact our liquidity, and require us to utilize our available contingent liquidity or rely on alternative funding sources, which may or may not be available at the time. As of ~~August 31, 2010, no economic early amortization events have occurred.~~February 28, 2011, the 3-month rolling average excess spread was 14.4%.

Another feature of our securitization structure, which is applicable only to the notes issued from DCENT, is a reserve account funding requirement in which excess cash flows generated by the transferred loan receivables are held at the trust. This funding requirement is triggered when DCENT’s three-month average excess spread rate decreases to below 4.50%, with increasing funding requirements as excess spread levels decline below preset levels to 0%. ~~The reserve account funding requirement has been triggered only once, in August 2009, and the amount was released from the trust to us in the following month.~~ See Note 5: Credit Card and Student Loan Securitization Activities to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the structures of DCMT and DCENT and for tables providing information concerning investors’ interests and related excess spreads at ~~August 31, 2010.~~February 28, 2011.

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, we had ~~$14.6~~$12.9 billion of outstanding public asset-backed securities, ~~$0.3~~$0.8 billion of outstanding private asset-backed ~~conduit financings~~securitizations and ~~$4.5~~$4.6 billion of outstanding asset-backed securities that had been issued to our wholly-owned subsidiaries. The following table summarizes expected contractual maturities of the investors’ interests in securitizations excluding those that have been issued to our wholly-owned subsidiaries at ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

   Total    Less Than
One Year    One Year
Through
Three Years    Four Years
Through
Five Years    After Five
Years
Scheduled maturities of long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors
   $ 14,869,265    $ 4,849,549    $ 8,030,964    $ 989,113    $ 999,639

On September 20, 2010, an additional $600 million of public asset-backed securities were issued that are scheduled to mature in September 2015. On September 23, 2010, an additional $200 million of private asset backed conduit funding was utilized. Related to both the public issuance and the conduit utilization, an additional $111.8 million of subordinated interests were issued and retained by a wholly-owned subsidiary.

The cash collateral account loans that provide credit enhancement to certain DCMT certificates were $511 million at August 31, 2010 and were recorded in restricted cash—for securitization investors in our condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. These cash collateral accounts were funded through a loan facility entered into between a consolidated special purpose subsidiary, DRFC Funding LLC, and third-party lenders. At August 31, 2010, $341 million of the DRFC Funding LLC facility was outstanding and was recorded in long-term borrowings in our condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. Repayment of this loan facility is secured by the cash collateral account loans, which were sold to DRFC Funding LLC and are not expected to be available to our creditors.

~~The following table summarizes estimated maturities of the cash collateral accounts at August 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):~~

   Total    Less Than
One Year    One Year
Through
Three Years    Four Years
Through
Five Years    After Five
Years
Scheduled maturities of cash collateral accounts
   $ 510,790    $ 284,211    $ 167,369    $ 59,210    $ —


	Total		Less Than One Year		One Year Through Three Years		Four Years Through Five Years		After Five Years
Scheduled maturities of long-term borrowings—owed to credit card securitization investors	$	13,693,219	$	3,599,656	$	7,504,721	$	1,589,113	$	999,729

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, we had capacity to issue up to ~~$5.5~~$5.4 billion in triple-A rated asset-backed securities from DCENT without the issuance of additional Class B or Class C notes as subordination, which ~~could include $2.75~~was reduced to $4.4 billion after we issued $1 billion in ~~undrawn~~credit card asset-backed ~~conduit capacity.~~securities on March 8, 2011. The triple-A rating of DCENT Class A Notes issued to date has been based, in part, on an FDIC rule which ~~creates~~created a safe harbor that provides that the FDIC, as conservator or receiver, will not, using its power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts, seek to reclaim or recover assets transferred in connection with a securitization, or recharacterize them as assets of the insured depository institution, provided such transfer ~~meets~~satisfies the conditions for sale accounting treatment under previous GAAP. ~~There has been uncertainty in both~~Pursuant to amendments to GAAP related to transfers of financial assets, effective for us on December 1, 2009, certain transfers of assets to special purpose entities (including Discover Bank’s transfers of assets to the public and private securitization markets as to whether the safe harbor rule will continue to apply to securitized receivables that are treated as secured borrowings rather than as sales in accordance with GAAP as amended by Statements No. 166 and 167. OnDiscover Card Master Trust) no longer qualify for sale accounting treatment. However, on September 27, 2010, the FDIC approved a final rule that preserves the safe-harbor treatment applicable to revolving trusts and master trusts, ~~which we believe includes~~including the Discover Card Master Trust, so long as those trusts ~~used~~would have satisfied the original FDIC safe harbor if evaluated under GAAP pertaining to transfers of financial assets in ~~our credit card securitization program.~~effect prior to December 1, 2009. Other legislative and regulatory developments, namely the proposed SEC Regulation AB 2,II, the securitization and rating agency provisions of the Reform Act and the federal banking agencies’ notice regarding their consideration of replacement of the ratings-based approach for assessing capital charges against securitization exposures, may, however, impact our ability and/or desire to issue asset-backed securities in the future. ~~See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—Asset-Backed Securities Regulations” for additional information.~~

Short-Term Borrowings.We primarily access short-term borrowings through the Federal Funds market or through repurchase agreements. In the past two years, we have ~~accessed~~rarely used short-term borrowings, ~~through~~however, we have recently been borrowing overnight Federal Funds ~~purchased, and other~~on an opportunistic basis. Information about our use of short-term borrowings ~~with original maturities of less than one year. However,~~for the three months ended February 28, 2011 is shown in the table below (dollars in thousands):


	As of and for the three months ended, February 28, 2011
	Maximum Daily Balance During Period		Quarter-End Amount		Quarter-End Weighted Average Interest Rate
Overnight Federal Funds purchased	$	120,000	$	100,000		0.18	%
Overnight repurchase agreements	$	48,188		0		0.00	%

Total short-term borrowings			$	100,000		0.18	%

Corporate and Bank Debt. At February 28, 2011, we had ~~no outstanding short-term borrowings at August 31, 2010.~~

~~Long-Term Borrowings and Subordinated Notes.~~ ~~At August 31, 2010, we had $0.8 billion~~$800 million in principal amount of senior unsecured notes outstanding ~~reflecting two separate issuances of $400 million each of fixed rate senior unsecured notes, one maturing in June 2017~~ and ~~the other maturing in July 2019. As of August 31, 2010,~~ Discover Bank had ~~a total of~~ $1.2 billion in principal amount of subordinated notes ~~outstanding, which included~~outstanding. Our senior unsecured notes are comprised of two issuances, each $400 million in principal amount, with one issuance maturing in June 2017 and the other issuance maturing in July 2019. The senior unsecured notes would require us to offer to repurchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of their aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest in the event of a change of control involving us and a corresponding ratings downgrade to below investment grade. Discover Bank’s subordinated notes are comprised of one $700 million issuance due in November 2019 and a $500 million issuance due in April 2020. For more information, see Note 7: Long-Term Borrowings to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~ECASLA.~~Other Long-Term Borrowings—Student Loans.~~The Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (as amended, “ECASLA”) provides originators of Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) loans with a cost-effective source~~ At February 28, 2011, we had $500 million and $2.8 billion of funding related to federal student loans, which are currently classified as held for sale, and ~~liquidity with respect to qualifying FFELP loans. On~~private student loans, respectively. We obtained $500 million of funding in April ~~12,~~ 2010 ~~Discover Bank financed $0.5 billion of eligible FFELP loans~~ through an agreement with ~~Straight-A Funding, LLC,~~ an asset-backed commercial paper conduit sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education ~~(“DOE”)~~ under ~~ECASLA, which matures August 2013. On September 23,~~the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008. We assumed $3.2 billion principal amount outstanding of securitization debt in December 2010 ~~Discover Bank sold $1.5 billion~~as part of ~~federal~~the SLC acquisition. Principal and interest payments on the underlying student loans will reduce the ~~majority~~balance of which were classified as held for sale as of August 31, 2010, to the DOE. The impact of the sale on net income was not material. During the third quarter 2010, we earned an interest yield of approximately 1.4% on our federal student loan portfolio, which is based on rates published by the U.S. Department of Education.these secured borrowings over time.

Additional Funding Sources

Private Asset-Backed ~~Conduit Funding Facilities.~~Securitizations.We have access to committed undrawn capacity through privately placed asset-backed ~~conduits~~securitizations to support the funding of our credit card loan receivables. Under these ~~conduits,~~arrangements, we had used ~~$0.3~~$0.8 billion of capacity ~~at August 31, 2010~~ and ~~in September 2010, we used an additional $0.2 billion of capacity. As of September 30, 2010, we~~ had undrawn capacity of $2.6 billion. The FDIC final rule approved on September 27, 2010 grandfathered these conduit commitments such that they may be utilized through their scheduled maturity with the benefit of the safe harbor. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—Asset-Backed Securities Regulations” for more information regarding the FDIC final rule.$4.8 billion at February 28, 2011.

Unsecured Committed Credit Facility.Our unsecured committed credit facility of $2.4 billion is available through May 2012. This facility serves to diversify our funding sources and enhance our liquidity. This facility is provided by a group of major global banks, and is available to both Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank (Discover Financial Services may borrow up to 30% and Discover Bank may borrow up to 100% of the total commitment). The facility is available to support general liquidity needs and may be drawn to meet short-term funding needs from time to time. The terms of the credit facility include various affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants related to the maintenance of certain capitalization and tangible net worth levels, and certain double leverage, delinquency and tier 1 capital to managed loans ratios. The credit facility also includes customary events of default with corresponding grace periods, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to other agreements evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money and bankruptcy-related defaults. The facility may be terminated upon an event of default. We have no outstanding balances due under the facility.

Federal ~~Reserve.~~Reserve.Discover Bank has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s discount window. As of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, Discover Bank had ~~$7.5~~$8.4 billion of available capacity through the discount ~~window.~~window based on the amount of assets pledged. We have no borrowings outstanding under the discount window.

Credit Ratings

Our borrowing costs and capacity in certain funding markets, including securitizations and senior and subordinated debt, may be affected by the credit ratings ~~for~~of Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank and the securitization trusts. Downgrades in these credit ratings could result in higher interest expense on our unsecured debt and asset securitizations, as well as potentially higher fees related to borrowings under our lines of credit. In addition to increased funding costs, ~~declines~~deterioration in credit ratings could reduce our borrowing capacity in the unsecured debt and asset securitization capital markets.

We also have agreements with certain of our derivative counterparties that contain provisions that require Discover Bank’s debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from specified major credit rating agencies. If Discover Bank’s credit rating is reduced to below investment grade, we would be required to post additional collateral, which, as of ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, would have been ~~$20~~$31 million.

A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The credit ratings are summarized in the following table:

Discover
Financial
Services

Discover
Bank

Outlook
for Senior
Unsecured
~~Debt~~
Debt

Discover
Bank

Discover Card
Master Trust I

Discover Card Execution
Note Trust

~~Senior~~
~~Unsecured~~
~~Debt~~

Senior
Unsecured
Debt

Subordinated
Debt

Class A⁽¹⁾

Class B

Class A⁽¹⁾

Class B

Class C

Moody’s Investors Service

Ba1

Baa3

~~Negative~~

Stable

Ba1

Aaa(sf)

A1(sf)

Aaa(sf)

A1(sf)

Baa1(sf)

Standard & Poor’s

BBB-

BBB

Stable

BBB-

AAA(SF)

AA+(SF)

AAA(SF)

AA+(SF)

A+(SF)

Fitch Ratings

BBB

Stable

BBB-

AAAsf

AAsf

AAAsf

AA-sf

A-sf

(1)	An “sf” in the rating denotes an identification for structured finance product ratings that was implemented for these products by the rating agencies as of September 2010.

Several rating agencies have announced that they will be evaluating the effects of the Reform Act that was enacted in July 2010 in order to determine the extent, if any, to which financial institutions, including us, may be negatively impacted. While we are currently unaware of any negative actions, there is no assurance that our credit ratings could not be downgraded in the future as a result of any such reviews. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments” for information regarding the Reform Act.

Liquidity

We seek to ensure that we have adequate liquidity to sustain business operations, fund asset growth and satisfy debt obligations. In the assessment of our liquidity needs, we also evaluate a range of stress events that would impact our access to normal funding sources, cash needs and/or liquidity. We maintain contingent funding sources, including our liquidity investment portfolio, ~~asset-backed conduit~~private securitizations with unused capacity, committed credit facility capacity and Federal Reserve discount window capacity, which we could seek to utilize to satisfy liquidity needs during such stress events. We expect to be able to satisfy all maturing obligations and fund business operations during the next 12 months by utilizing our deposit channels, credit card asset-backed securitizations and our contingent funding sources.

We maintain policies outlining the overall framework and general principles for managing liquidity risk across our business, which is the responsibility of our Asset and Liability Committee (the “ALCO”). We seek to balance the trade-offs between maintaining too much liquidity, which may limit financial flexibility and be costly, with having too little liquidity that could cause financial distress. Liquidity risk is centrally managed by the ALCO, which is chaired by our CFO and has cross-functional membership. The ALCO monitors positions and determines any actions that need to be taken.

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, our liquidity investment portfolio was comprised of cash and cash equivalents and high quality, liquid ~~unencumbered~~ investments. Cash and cash equivalents are invested primarily in deposits with the Federal Reserve ~~certificates of deposit with highly-rated banks which had maturities of 90 days or less when purchased,~~ and AAA rated government money market mutual funds. Investments included highly-rated certificates of deposit, ~~with maturities greater than 90 days and~~ credit card asset-backed securities of other ~~issuers.~~issuers plus U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agency and AAA-rated corporate debt obligations issued under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program that are guaranteed by the FDIC, all of which are considered highly liquid. In addition, we have the ability to raise cash through utilizing repurchase agreements and pledging certain of these investments. The level of our liquidity investment portfolio may fluctuate based upon the level of expected maturities of our funding sources as well as operational requirements and market conditions.

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, our liquidity investment portfolio ~~was $9.1~~and undrawn credit facilities were $24.6 billion, which was ~~$5.4~~$2.1 billion ~~lower~~higher than the balance at November 30, ~~2009 due to funding of maturities of primarily asset-backed securities~~2010 as we added multi-year conduit capacity in the first ~~half 2010. Our undrawn credit facilities have increased since November 30, 2009 by $3.0 billion, primarily due~~quarter 2011 in order to balance the ~~net addition~~flexibility and economics of ~~$1.3 billion of asset backed conduit funding facilities and through a $1.7 billion increase in pledged collateral, including the credit for pledged collateral, to the Federal Reserve discount window.~~our liquidity mix.


	August 31, 2010		November 30, 2009		February 28, 2011		November 30, 2010
	(dollars in billions)				(dollars in billions)
Liquidity investment portfolio
Cash and cash equivalents⁽¹⁾	$	7.6	$	12.7	$	4.6	$	4.7
Other investments		1.5		1.8
Other short term investments						0.4		0.4
Investment securities						5.2		5.0

Total liquidity investment portfolio		9.1		14.5		10.2		10.1
Undrawn credit facilities
Asset-backed conduit funding facilities		2.8		1.5
Private asset-backed securitizations						4.8		3.3
Committed unsecured credit facility		2.4		2.4		2.4		2.4
Federal Reserve discount window⁽²⁾		6.5		4.8		7.2		6.7

Total undrawn credit facilities		11.7		8.7		14.4		12.4

Total liquidity investment portfolio and undrawn credit facilities	$	20.8	$	23.2	$	24.6	$	22.5

(1)	Cash-in-process is excluded from cash and cash equivalents for liquidity purposes.

(2)	Excludes ~~$1.1~~$1.2 billion and $1.5 billion of investments accounted for in the liquidity investment portfolio that were pledged to the Federal Reserve ~~which is included within the liquidity investment portfolio.~~as of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2010, respectively.

Subsequent to August 31, 2010, we moved a portion of our liquidity investment portfolio into approximately $4 billion of U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities, both of which we expect to be readily convertible to cash. This investment strategy is expected to result in a higher return for our liquidity investment portfolio. This investment strategy is not expected to have a material impact on our risk based capital ratios. See “—Capital” section below for further information on our capital ratios.

Capital

Our primary sources of capital are from the earnings generated by ~~the business~~our businesses and ~~issuance~~issuances in the capital markets. We seek to manage capital to a level and composition sufficient to support the risks of ~~the business,~~our businesses, meet regulatory requirements, adhere to rating agency guidelines and support future business growth. Within

these constraints, we are focused on deploying capital in a manner that provides attractive returns to our stockholders. The level, composition and utilization of capital are influenced by changes in the economic environment, ~~in addition to~~strategic initiatives, and legislative and regulatory developments. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—International Initiatives Related to Capital and Liquidity” for a discussion of recent initiatives related to capital matters.

Under regulatory capital requirements adopted by the FDIC, the Federal Reserve and other bank regulatory agencies, we, along with Discover Bank, must maintain minimum levels of capital. Failure to meet minimum

capital requirements can result in the initiation of certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could limit our business activities and have a direct material effect on our financial position and results. We must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets ~~liabilities,~~ and ~~certain off-balance sheet items,~~liabilities as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Our capital adequacy assessment also includes tax and accounting considerations in accordance with regulatory guidance. We maintain a substantial deferred tax asset on our balance sheet, and we include this asset when calculating our regulatory capital levels. However, for regulatory capital purposes, deferred tax assets that are dependent on future taxable income are currently limited to the lesser of: (i) the amount of deferred tax assets we expect to realize within one year of the calendar quarter-end date, based on our projected future taxable income for that year; or (ii) 10% of the amount of our Tier 1 capital. At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, no portion of our deferred tax asset was disallowed for regulatory capital purposes.

At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, Discover Financial Services and Discover Bank met the requirements for well-capitalized status, exceeding the regulatory minimums to which they were subject. See Note ~~12:~~10: Capital Adequacy to our condensed consolidated financial statements for quantitative disclosures of our capital ratios and levels. Recent regulatory initiatives may subject us to increased capital requirements in the future. See “—Legislative and Regulatory Developments—International Initiatives Related to Capital and Liquidity.”

~~Equity Capital.~~DividendsAt August 31, 2010, equity was $6.1 billion as compared to $8.4 billion at November 30, 2009. The decline in equity is the result of adopting Statements No. 166 and 167 in the first quarter 2010, which reduced equity by $1.3 billion, and redeeming all outstanding shares of the preferred stock that had previously been issued to the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program in the second quarter 2010, which reduced equity by $1.2 billion. On July 7, 2010, we repurchased the warrant to purchase 20,500,413 shares of our common stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the issuance of our preferred stock. .We ~~repurchased the warrant from the U.S. Treasury for $172 million.~~

~~Dividends.~~~~Our board of directors~~ declared a common stock ~~cash~~ dividend of ~~$.02~~$.06 per share in ~~September 2010, payable on October 21, 2010, to holders of record on October 7, 2010.~~March 2011. The declaration and payment of future dividends, as well as the amount thereof, are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, capital levels, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will declare and pay any dividends in the future. In addition, our banking regulators and applicable banking laws and regulations may limit our ability to pay dividends or take other actions that impact our capital levels, such as share repurchases. Further, as a result of ~~applicable banking law, regulations and guidance and~~ provisions that may be contained in our borrowing agreements or the borrowing agreements of our subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders may be ~~further~~ limited.

~~Stock Repurchase Program.~~On December 3, 2007, we announced that our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of our outstanding shares of common stock. This share repurchase program expires on November 30, 2010, and may be terminated at any time. At August 31, 2010, we had not repurchased any stock under this program.

Guarantees

Guarantees are contracts or indemnification agreements that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying asset, liability, or equity security of a guaranteed party, rate or index. Also included in guarantees are contracts that contingently require the guarantor to make payments to a guaranteed party based on another entity’s failure to perform under an agreement. Our guarantees relate to transactions processed on the Discover Network and certain transactions processed by PULSE and Diners Club. See Note ~~13:~~11: Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding our guarantees.

Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. Contractual obligations at ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, which include deposits, securitized debt, long-term borrowings, operating and capital lease obligations and purchase obligations were ~~$54 billion. Contractual obligations grew $18~~$56 billion, ~~from November 30, 2009, largely~~which includes $2.9 billion of securitized debt assumed as ~~a result~~part of the consolidation of the liabilities of the variable interest entities used in our securitization activities and also due to the growth in our deposit funding. For more information, see “—Change in Accounting Principle Related to Off-Balance Sheet Securitizations.”SLC acquisition. For a description of our contractual obligations, ~~as of November 30, 2009,~~ see our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ~~ended~~ending November 30, ~~2009~~2010 under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments.”

~~At August 31, 2010, we had extended~~We extend credit for consumer and commercial loans, ~~of approximately $166 billion,~~ primarily arising from agreements with customers for unused lines of credit on certain credit cards, ~~subject to~~provided there is no violation of conditions established in the ~~customer’s compliance with the~~

related ~~cardmember~~ agreement. At February 28, 2011, our unused commitments were $165 billion. These commitments, substantially all of which we can terminate at any time and which do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, are periodically reviewed based on account usage and customer creditworthiness. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we guarantee payment on behalf of subsidiaries relating to contractual obligations with external parties. The activities of the subsidiaries covered by any such guarantees are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one or more market prices, rates, indices, correlations or other market factors will result in losses for a position or portfolio. We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates.

Interest Rate ~~Risk~~Risk.. We borrow money from a variety of depositors and institutions in order to provide loans to our customers, as well as invest in other assets and our business. These loans and other assets earn interest, which we use to pay interest on the money borrowed. Our net interest income and, therefore, earnings, will be negatively affected if the interest rate earned on assets increases at a slower pace than increases to the interest rate we owe on our borrowings. Changes in interest rates ~~impact interest-earning assets, principally~~and competitor responses to those changes may influence customer payment rates, loan ~~receivables. Changes in interest rates also impact interest sensitive liabilities that finance these assets, including asset-backed securitizations, deposits, and short-term and long-term borrowings.~~balances or deposit account activity. We may face higher-cost alternative sources of funding as a result, which has the potential to decrease earnings.

Our interest rate risk management policies are designed to measure and manage the potential volatility of earnings that may arise from changes in interest rates by having a financing portfolio that reflects the mix of variable and fixed rate assets. To the extent that asset and related financing repricing characteristics of a particular portfolio are not matched effectively, we may utilize interest rate derivative contracts, such as swap agreements, to achieve our objectives. Interest rate swap agreements effectively convert the underlying asset or financing from fixed to floating rate or from floating to fixed rate. See Note ~~16:~~14: Derivatives and Hedging Activities to our condensed consolidated financial statements for information on our derivatives activity.

We use an interest rate sensitivity simulation to assess our interest rate risk exposure. For purposes of presenting the possible earnings effect of a hypothetical, adverse change in interest rates over the 12-month

period from our reporting date, we assume that all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities will be impacted by a hypothetical, immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates as of the beginning of the period. The sensitivity is based upon the hypothetical assumption that all relevant types of interest rates that affect our results would increase instantaneously, simultaneously and to the same degree.

Our interest rate sensitive assets include our variable rate loan receivables and the assets that make up our liquidity investment portfolio. Due to recently enacted credit card legislation, we now have restrictions on our ability to mitigate interest rate risk by adjusting rates on existing balances. At ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, the majority of our credit card loans were at variable rates. Beginning in the third quarter 2010, we began using interest rate derivatives to reduce the asset sensitivity that resulted from having a larger percentage of our loan portfolio at variable rates. Assets with rates that are fixed at period end but which will mature, or otherwise contractually reset to a market-based indexed rate or other fixed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, are considered to be rate sensitive. The latter category includes certain credit card loans that may be offered at below-market rates for an introductory period, such as balance transfers and special promotional programs, after which the loans will contractually reprice in accordance with our normal market-based pricing structure. For purposes of measuring rate sensitivity for such loans, only the effect of the hypothetical 100 basis point change in the underlying market-based indexed rate or other fixed rate has been considered rather than the full change in the rate to which the loan would contractually reprice. For assets that have a fixed interest rate at the fiscal period end but which contractually will, or are assumed to, reset to a market-based indexed rate or other fixed rate during the next 12 months, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date. In addition, for all interest rate sensitive assets, earnings sensitivity is calculated net of expected loan losses.

Interest rate sensitive liabilities are assumed to be those for which the stated interest rate is not contractually fixed for the next 12-month period. Thus, liabilities that vary with changes in a market-based index, such as Federal Funds or LIBOR, which will reset before the end of the 12-month period, or liabilities whose rates are fixed at the fiscal period end but which will mature and are assumed to be replaced with a market-based indexed rate prior to the end of the 12-month period, also are considered to be rate sensitive. For these fixed rate liabilities, earnings sensitivity is measured from the expected repricing date.

Assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in the interest rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at ~~August 31, 2010,~~February 28, 2011, we estimate that net interest income over the following 12-month period would increase by approximately ~~$56 million.~~$54 million, or 1%. Assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in the interest rates affecting all interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities at November 30, ~~2009,~~2010 we estimated that net interest income over the following 12-month period would increase by approximately $84 million. The decline in the estimated impact of an immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates at August 31, 2010 as compared to November 30, 2009, was primarily driven by reducing the asset sensitivity of our balance sheet through the use of interest rate derivatives. Specifically, beginning in the third quarter 2010, we entered into interest rate derivative agreements under which we receive a fixed interest rate on forecasted cash flows related to variable rate credit card receivables. We anticipate that the asset sensitivity of the balance sheet will be reduced further with continued management of our balance sheet sensitivity and through the use of derivatives.$50 million, or 1%. We have not provided an estimate of any impact on net interest income of a decrease in interest rates as many of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are tied to interest rates that are already at or near their minimum levels and, therefore, could not materially decrease further.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or

submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~There~~On December 31, 2010, we completed our acquisition of SLC which includes its existing information systems and internal controls over financial reporting that previously existed when SLC was a separate publicly traded company. In conducting our evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we have elected to exclude SLC from our evaluation as permitted under SEC rules. We are currently in the process of evaluating and integrating SLC’s historical internal controls over financial reporting with ours. We expect to complete this integration by November 30, 2011, the end of our current fiscal year.

Other than the change noted above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~August 31, 2010~~February 28, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

~~In the normal course of business, from time to time, we have been named as~~For a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with our activities. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. We have historically relied on the arbitration clause in our cardmember agreements, which has in some instances limited the costs of, and our exposure to, litigation, but there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in enforcing our arbitration clause in the future. Legal challenges to the enforceability of these clauses have led most card issuers and may cause us to discontinue their use, and there are bills pending in Congress to directly or indirectly prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses. Further, we are involved in pending legal actions challenging our arbitration clause. We are also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies regarding our business, including, among other matters, accounting, tax and operational matters, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions, or other relief. For example, we have received a notice of proposed assessment from the IRS related to its auditdescription of our ~~1999-2005 tax years as further discussed in~~material legal proceedings, see Note ~~10: Income Taxes~~12: Litigation to ~~the~~our condensed consolidated financial statements. ~~Litigation and regulatory actions could also adversely affect our reputation.~~

We contest liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, we cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of the pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although the outcome of such matters could be material to our operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, our level of income for such period.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors ~~previously~~ disclosed in ~~our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 and~~ our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, ~~2009.~~

2010.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of our common stock related to employee transactions made by us or on our behalf during the three months ended ~~August 31, 2010:~~February 28, 2011. Amounts reflect shares withheld (under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans) to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon the delivery of outstanding shares underlying restricted stock units or upon the exercise of stock options. We do not currently have any programs related to the repurchase of shares of our common stock.

Period
   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased⁽²⁾    Average Price
Paid per Share    Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs⁽¹⁾    Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs
June 1 – 30, 2010

Repurchase program⁽¹⁾
   —      $ —      —      $   1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾
   1,937    $ 14.37    N/A    N/A
July 1 – 31, 2010

Repurchase program⁽¹⁾
   —      $ —      —      $ 1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾
   175,145    $ 13.84    N/A    N/A
August 1 – 31, 2010

Repurchase program⁽¹⁾
   —      $ —      —      $ 1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾
   13,728    $ 15.11    N/A    N/A

Total

Repurchase program⁽¹⁾
   —      $ —      —      $ 1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾
   190,810    $ 13.93    N/A    N/A


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share
December 1—31, 2010		826	$	18.83
January 1—31, 2011		268,629	$	18.53
February 1—28, 2011		571	$	20.89

Total		270,026	$	18.54

~~(1)~~

On December 3, 2007, we announced that our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $1 billion of our outstanding stock under a new share repurchase program. This share repurchase program expires on November 30, 2010, and may be terminated at any time. At August 31, 2010, we had not repurchased any stock under this program.

~~(2)~~

Reflects shares withheld (under the terms of grants under employee stock incentive compensation plans) to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon the delivery of outstanding shares underlying restricted stock units or upon the exercise of stock options.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.

Other Information

None

Item 6.

Exhibits

See “Exhibit Index” for documents filed herewith and incorporated herein by reference.

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Discover Financial Services (Registrant)

By:		/S/ ROY A. GUTHRIE
		Roy A. Guthrie Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: ~~October 6, 2010~~April 7, 2011

Exhibit Index


Exhibit Number		Description

10.1		~~Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, between Discover Bank as Master Servicer, Servicer and Seller and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,~~Amendment No. 3, dated as of ~~June 4,~~September 21, 2010, ~~(filed~~among Discover Financial Services, Discover Bank, the subsidiary borrowers from time to time party thereto, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as ~~Exhibit 4.1 to Discover Bank’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).~~Administrative Agent.

10.2		Amendment to ~~Specified Series Supplements, between~~Purchase Price Adjustment Agreement by and among Citibank, N.A., The Student Loan Corporation and Discover Bank, ~~as Master Servicer, Servicer and Seller and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,~~ dated ~~as of June 4,~~December 30, 2010 (filed as Exhibit ~~4.2~~10.33 to Discover ~~Bank’s Current~~Financial Services’ Annual Report on Form ~~8-K~~10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 which was filed on ~~June 4, 2010~~January 26, 2011 and incorporated ~~herein~~ by reference thereto).

10.3		First Amendment to ~~Trust~~Indemnification Agreement by and between Citibank, N.A. and Discover Bank, ~~as Beneficiary and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee,~~ dated ~~as of June 4,~~December 30, 2010 (filed as Exhibit ~~4.3~~10.35 to Discover ~~Bank’s Current~~Financial Services’ Annual Report on Form ~~8-K~~10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010 which was filed on ~~June 4, 2010~~January 26, 2011 and incorporated ~~herein~~ by reference thereto).

10.4		~~First Amendment to Indenture, between~~Form Award Certificate for Restricted Stock Units Under Discover ~~Card Execution Note Trust, as Issuer,~~Financial Services Amended and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of June 4, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Discover Bank’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).Restated 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

10.5		Form Award Certificate for Performance Stock Units Under Discover Financial Services Amended and Restated Indenture Supplement for the DiscoverSeries Notes, between Discover Card Execution Note Trust, as Issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of June 4, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Discover Bank’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference thereto).2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.


	August 31, 2010			November 30, 2009
	(unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,916,091		$	13,020,719
Restricted cash—special dividend escrow		—			643,311
Restricted cash—for securitization investors		691,698			—
Other short-term investments		375,000			1,350,000
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale (amortized cost of $1,134,898 and $2,743,729 at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively)		1,151,689			2,645,481
Held-to-maturity (fair value of $73,029 and $1,953,990 at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively)		74,058			2,389,816

Total investments securities		1,225,747			5,035,297
Loan receivables:
Student loans held for sale		1,437,592			—
Loan portfolio:
Credit card—restricted for securitization investors		34,789,458			—
Other credit card		10,458,708			20,230,302

Total credit card loan receivables		45,248,166			20,230,302
Other		3,444,906			3,394,782

Total loan portfolio		48,693,072			23,625,084

Total loan receivables		50,130,664			23,625,084
Allowance for loan losses		(3,743,721	)		(1,757,899	)

Net loan receivables		46,386,943			21,867,185
Amounts due from asset securitization		—			1,692,051
Premises and equipment, net		456,943			499,303
Goodwill		255,421			255,421
Intangible assets, net		190,639			195,636
Other assets		2,559,071			1,462,064

Total assets	$	60,057,553		$	46,020,987

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Interest-bearing deposit accounts	$	34,148,932		$	32,028,506
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts		97,872			64,506

Total deposits		34,246,804			32,093,012
Long-term borrowings:
Long-term borrowings—owed to securitization investors		14,869,265			—
Other long-term borrowings		2,839,488			2,428,101

Total long-term borrowings		17,708,753			2,428,101
Special dividend—Morgan Stanley		—			808,757
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,990,699			2,255,570

Total liabilities		53,946,256			37,585,440
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 13)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 0 and 1,224,558 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively		—			1,158,066
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 546,991,067 and 544,799,041 shares issued at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively		5,470			5,448
Additional paid-in capital		3,428,089			3,573,231
Retained earnings		2,787,822			3,873,262
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(82,297	)		(154,818	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,440,632 and 1,876,795 shares at August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively		(27,787	)		(19,642	)

Total stockholders’ equity		6,111,297			8,435,547

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	60,057,553		$	46,020,987


	August 31, 2010⁽¹⁾		November 30, 2009
Loans not accruing interest	$	374,836	$	190,086
Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest	$	928,521	$	522,190
Restructured loans⁽²⁾	$	284,561	$	72,924


	November 30, 2009
Interest-only receivable strip (carrying amount/fair value)	$	118
Weighted average life (in months)		3.5
Weighted average payment rate (rate per month)		18.70	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(4	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(7	)
Weighted average principal charge-offs (rate per annum)		9.91	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(46	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(81	)
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)		16.50	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	—
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(1	)
Cash collateral accounts (carrying amount/fair value)	$	823
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)		1.99	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(3	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(7	)
Certificated retained beneficial interests reported as available-for-sale investment securities (carrying amount/fair value)	$	2,205
Weighted average discount rate (rate per annum)		6.58	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(14	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(27	)


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009		For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
Proceeds from third-party investors in new credit card securitizations	$	1,496	$	2,246
Proceeds from collections reinvested in previous credit card securitizations	$	11,964	$	33,569
Contractual servicing fees received	$	121	$	358
Cash flows received from retained interests	$	352	$	1,349
Purchases of previously transferred credit card loan receivables (securitization maturities)	$	1,382	$	4,371


	November 30, 2009
Loans Outstanding:
Managed credit card loans	$	47,465
Less: Securitized credit card loans		27,235

Owned credit card loans	$	20,230

Loans Over 30 Days Delinquent:
Managed credit card loans	$	2,657
Less: Securitized credit card loans		1,540

Owned credit card loans	$	1,117


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009		For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
Average Loans:
Managed credit card loans	$	48,642	$	49,328
Less: Securitized credit card loans		24,591		23,868

Owned credit card loans	$	24,051	$	25,460

Net Principal Charge-offs:
Managed credit card loans	$	1,058	$	2,866
Less: Securitized credit card loans		544		1,407

Owned credit card loans	$	514	$	1,459


	August 31, 2010				November 30, 2009				Interest Rate Terms	Maturity
	Outstanding		Interest Rate		Outstanding		Interest Rate		Interest Rate Terms	Maturity
*Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust*
Fixed rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾	$	2,598,208	5.47	%	$	—	—		5.10% to 5.65% fixed	Various April 2011— September 2017
Floating rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾		10,771,057	0.75	%		—	—		1-month LIBOR⁽²⁾ + 3 to 130 basis points	Various November 2010— July 2014
Floating rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾		1,250,000	0.88	%		—	—		3-month LIBOR⁽²⁾ + 34 basis points	December 2012
Floating rate asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾		250,000	1.00	%		—	—		Commercial Paper rate + 70 basis points	April 2013

Total Long-Term Borrowings—owed to securitization investors		14,869,265				—
*Discover Financial Services (Parent Company)*
Floating rate senior notes		—	—			400,000	0.83	%	3-month LIBOR⁽²⁾ + 53 basis points	June 2010
Fixed rate senior notes due 2017		399,447	6.45	%		399,385	6.45	%	6.45% fixed	June 2017
Fixed rate senior notes due 2019		400,000	10.25	%		400,000	10.25	%	10.25% fixed	July 2019
*Discover Bank*
Subordinated bank notes due 2019		698,337	8.70	%		698,202	8.70	%	8.70% fixed	November 2019
Subordinated bank notes due 2020		496,666	7.00	%		—	—		7.00% fixed	April 2020
Floating rate secured borrowing⁽³⁾		104,476	0.80	%		528,246	0.74	%	Commercial Paper rate + 50 basis points	December 2010⁽³⁾
Floating rate secured borrowing⁽³⁾		236,050	0.73	%		—	—		1-month LIBOR⁽²⁾ + 45 basis points	December 2010⁽³⁾
Floating rate secured borrowing⁽⁴⁾		503,935	0.76	%		—	—		Commercial Paper rate + 50 basis points	August 2013⁽⁴⁾
Capital lease obligations		577	6.26	%		2,268	6.26	%	6.26% fixed	Various

*Total Other Long-Term Borrowings*		2,839,488				2,428,101

Total long-term borrowings	$	17,708,753			$	2,428,101


	Pension
	For the Three Months Ended August 31,						For the Nine Months Ended August 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	—		$	255		$	—		$	765
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		5,214			5,047			15,642			15,141
Expected return on plan assets		(5,823	)		(6,027	)		(17,469	)		(18,081	)
Net amortization		406			(2	)		1,218			(6	)
Net settlements and curtailments		68			—			204			—

Net periodic benefit income	$	(135	)	$	(727	)	$	(405	)	$	(2,181	)


	Postretirement
	For the Three Months Ended August 31,						For the Nine Months Ended August 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost, benefits earned during the period	$	264		$	194		$	792		$	582
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		347			394			1,041			1,182
Net amortization		(1	)		(38	)		(3	)		(114	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	610		$	550		$	1,830		$	1,650


	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirements					Capital Requirements To Be Classified as Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
August 31, 2010⁽¹⁾ :
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	7,595,473	15.5	%	$	3,931,518	³	8.0	%	$	4,914,398	³	10.0	%
Discover Bank	$	7,601,827	15.7	%	$	3,876,790	³	8.0	%	$	4,845,987	³	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	5,747,535	11.7	%	$	1,965,759	³	4.0	%	$	2,948,639	³	6.0	%
Discover Bank	$	5,762,334	11.9	%	$	1,938,395	³	4.0	%	$	2,907,592	³	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	5,747,535	9.5	%	$	2,417,397	³	4.0	%	$	3,021,746	³	5.0	%
Discover Bank	$	5,762,334	9.7	%	$	2,385,823	³	4.0	%	$	2,982,279	³	5.0	%
November 30, 2009:
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	9,516,965	17.9	%	$	4,262,230	³	8.0	%	$	5,327,788	³	10.0	%
Discover Bank	$	8,210,450	15.8	%	$	4,168,103	³	8.0	%	$	5,210,129	³	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	8,139,309	15.3	%	$	2,131,115	³	4.0	%	$	3,196,673	³	6.0	%
Discover Bank	$	6,572,320	12.6	%	$	2,084,052	³	4.0	%	$	3,126,077	³	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Discover Financial Services	$	8,139,309	18.1	%	$	1,798,937	³	4.0	%	$	2,248,672	³	5.0	%
Discover Bank	$	6,572,320	15.9	%	$	1,657,397	³	4.0	%	$	2,071,746	³	5.0	%


For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2010	Balance at May 31, 2010		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)		Purchases, Sales, Other Settlements and Issuances, net			Net Transfers Into and/or Out of Level 3		Balance at August 31, 2010		Change in unrealized gains (losses) related to financial instruments held at August 31, 2010
Assets
Asset-backed commercial paper notes	$	63,732	$	7,161	$	(70,893	)	$	—	$	—	$	—
Equity securities		17		—		—			—		17		—

Available-for-sale investment securities	$	63,749	$	7,161	$	(70,893	)	$	—	$	17	$	—


For the Three Months Ended February 28, 2011	Balance at November 30, 2010		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)		Sales			Net Transfers Into and/ or Out of Level 3		Balance at February 28, 2011		Change in unrealized gains (losses) related to financial instruments held at February 28, 2011
Assets
Equity securities	$	17	$	144	$	(161	)	$	0	$	0	$	0

Available-for-sale investment securities	$	17	$	144	$	(161	)	$	0	$	0	$	0


		For the three months ended August 31					For the nine months ended August 31,
	Location	2010			2009		2010		2009
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Interest Rate Swaps-Cash Flow Hedges:
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income after amounts reclassified into earnings, pre-tax	Other Comprehensive Income	$	251		$	—	$	251	$	—

Total gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income		$	251			—	$	251		—

Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings	Interest Income	$	442		$	—	$	442	$	—
Net hedge ineffectiveness	Other Income		—			—		—		—
Gain (loss) excluded from assessment of hedge effectiveness	Interest Income		—			—		—		—
Interest Rate Swaps-Fair Value Hedges:
Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps⁽¹⁾	Interest Expense		—			167		44		7,745
Gain (loss) on hedged item⁽²⁾	Interest Expense		—			2,907		—		8,425

Total gains (losses) recognized in income		$	442		$	3,074	$	486	$	16,170

Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Gain (loss) on forward contract	Other Income	$	(301	)	$	—	$	458	$	—
Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps	Other Income		—			166		6		1,767

Total gains (losses) on derivatives not designated as hedges recognized in income		$	(301	)	$	166	$	464	$	1,767


	GAAP Basis
For the Three Months Ended	Direct Banking		Payment Services			Total
August 31, 2010
Interest income	$	1,535,934	$	5		$	1,535,939
Interest expense		389,059		78			389,137

Net interest income		1,146,875		(73	)		1,146,802
Provision for loan losses		712,565		—			712,565
Other income		495,771		68,373			564,144
Other expense		534,782		31,456			566,238

Income before income tax expense	$	395,299	$	36,844		$	432,143


	Managed Basis							Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			GAAP Basis
	Direct Banking		Payment Services			Total		Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			Total
August 31, 2009
Interest income	$	1,663,886	$	195		$	1,664,081	$	(830,864	)	$	833,217
Interest expense		392,592		50			392,642		(88,241	)		304,401

Net interest income		1,271,294		145			1,271,439		(742,623	)		528,816
Provision for loan losses		924,427		—			924,427		(543,428	)		380,999
Other income⁽²⁾		1,055,529		61,236			1,116,765		199,195			1,315,960
Other expense		489,596		34,242			523,838		—			523,838

Income before income tax expense	$	912,800	$	27,139		$	939,939	$	—		$	939,939


	GAAP Basis
For the Nine Months Ended	Direct Banking		Payment Services			Total
August 31, 2010
Interest income	$	4,646,856	$	15		$	4,646,871
Interest expense		1,207,322		160			1,207,482

Net interest income		3,439,534		(145	)		3,439,389
Provision for loan losses		2,824,035		—			2,824,035
Other income		1,423,823		199,041			1,622,864
Other expense		1,465,749		88,841			1,554,590

Income before income tax expense	$	573,573	$	110,055		$	683,628


	Managed Basis							Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			GAAP Basis
	Direct Banking		Payment Services			Total		Securitization Adjustment⁽¹⁾			Total
August 31, 2009
Interest income	$	4,874,362	$	1,020		$	4,875,382	$	(2,368,388	)	$	2,506,994
Interest expense		1,244,932		190			1,245,122		(307,996	)		937,126

Net interest income		3,629,430		830			3,630,260		(2,060,392	)		1,569,868
Provision for loan losses		3,369,332		—			3,369,332		(1,406,659	)		1,962,673
Other income⁽²⁾		2,753,382		179,921			2,933,303		653,733			3,587,036
Other expense		1,545,611		97,978			1,643,589		—			1,643,589

Income before income tax expense	$	1,467,869	$	82,773		$	1,550,642	$	—		$	1,550,642


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
	As Reported			Securitization Adjustments			Managed		Additional Adjustments			As Adjusted
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	833,217		$	830,864		$	1,664,081	$	(3,294	)^(A)	$	1,660,787
Interest expense		304,401			88,241			392,642		(10,404	)^(B)		382,238

Net interest income		528,816			742,623			1,271,439		7,110			1,278,549
Provision for loan losses		380,999			543,428			924,427		160,782	^(C)		1,085,209

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		147,817			199,195			347,012		(153,672	)		193,340
Antitrust litigation settlement		472,167			—			472,167		(472,167	)^(D)		—
Other income		843,793			(199,195	)		644,598		(68,881	)^(E)		575,717

Total other income		1,315,960			(199,195	)		1,116,765		(541,048	)		575,717
Total other expense		523,838			—			523,838		—			523,838

Income (loss) before income tax expense		939,939			—			939,939		(694,720	)		245,219
Income tax expense (benefit)		362,485			—			362,485		(267,830	)^(F)		94,655

Net income (loss)	$	577,454		$	—		$	577,454	$	(426,890	)	$	150,564


	For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
	As Reported			Securitization Adjustments			Managed		Additional Adjustments			As Adjusted
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	2,506,994		$	2,368,388		$	4,875,382	$	(16,672	)^(A)	$	4,858,710
Interest expense		937,126			307,996			1,245,122		(32,783	)^(B)		1,212,339

Net interest income		1,569,868			2,060,392			3,630,260		16,111			3,646,371
Provision for loan losses		1,962,673			1,406,659			3,369,332		495,437	^(C)		3,864,769

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		(392,805	)		653,733			260,928		(479,326	)		(218,398	)
Antitrust litigation settlement		1,419,783			—			1,419,783		(1,419,783	)^(D)		—
Other income		2,167,253			(653,733	)		1,513,520		122,315	^(E)		1,635,835

Total other income		3,587,036			(653,733	)		2,933,303		(1,297,468	)		1,635,835
Total other expense		1,643,589			—			1,643,589		—			1,643,589

Income (loss) before income tax expense		1,550,642			—			1,550,642		(1,776,794	)		(226,152	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		626,994			—			626,994		(675,082	)^(F)		(48,088	)

Net income (loss)	$	923,648		$	—		$	923,648	$	(1,101,712	)	$	(178,064	)


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009		For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
GAAP	38.6	%	40.4	%
Adjustments	—		(19.1	)^(A)

As Adjusted	38.6	%	21.3	%


	As of and for the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009						As of and for the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
	Total Loan Receivables			Total Credit Card Loans			Total Loan Receivables			Total Credit Card Loans
	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)
Loan receivables
GAAP	$	25,489,809		$	22,721,603		$	25,489,809		$	22,721,603
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		25,406,787			25,406,787			25,406,787			25,406,787

As Adjusted	$	50,896,596		$	48,128,390		$	50,896,596		$	48,128,390

Allowance for loan losses (beginning of period)
GAAP	$	1,986,473					$	1,374,585
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		1,714,428						1,379,772

As Adjusted	$	3,700,901					$	2,754,357

Provision for loan losses
GAAP	$	380,999					$	1,962,673
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		704,210						1,902,096

As Adjusted	$	1,085,209					$	3,864,769

Charge-offs
GAAP	$	(580,851	)	$	(559,672	)	$	(1,651,050	)	$	(1,604,491	)
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(598,066	)		(598,066	)		(1,556,363	)		(1,556,363	)

As Adjusted	$	(1,178,917	)	$	(1,157,738	)	$	(3,207,413	)	$	(3,160,854	)

Recoveries
GAAP	$	45,739		$	45,486		$	146,152		$	145,503
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		54,639			54,639			149,706			149,706

As Adjusted	$	100,378		$	100,125		$	295,858		$	295,209

Net charge-offs
GAAP	$	(535,112	)	$	(514,186	)	$	(1,504,898	)	$	(1,458,988	)
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(543,427	)		(543,427	)		(1,406,657	)		(1,406,657	)

As Adjusted	$	(1,078,539	)	$	(1,057,613	)	$	(2,911,555	)	$	(2,865,645	)

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)
GAAP	$	1,832,360					$	1,832,360
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		1,875,211						1,875,211

As Adjusted	$	3,707,571					$	3,707,571

Net charge-offs %
GAAP		8.05	%		8.48	%		7.30	%		7.63	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		0.35			0.15			0.26			0.11

As Adjusted		8.40	%		8.63	%		7.56	%		7.74	%

Delinquency rate (Over 30 Days)
GAAP		4.86	%		5.27	%		4.86	%		5.27	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		0.25			0.04			0.25			0.04

As Adjusted		5.11	%		5.31	%		5.11	%		5.31	%

Delinquency rate (Over 90 Days)
GAAP		2.46	%		2.70	%		2.46	%		2.70	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		0.14			0.02			0.14			0.02

As Adjusted		2.60	%		2.72	%		2.60	%		2.72	%


	For the Three Months Ended			For the Nine Months Ended
	August 31, 2009
	(dollars in thousands)
Discover card
Charge-offs
GAAP	$	(541,272	)	$	(1,560,820	)
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(598,066	)		(1,556,363	)

As Adjusted	$	(1,139,338	)	$	(3,117,183	)

Recoveries
GAAP	$	45,214		$	144,901
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		54,639			149,706

As Adjusted	$	99,853		$	294,607


	As of November 30, 2009
	(dollars in thousands)
Discover card
Total Discover card loans
GAAP	$	19,826,153
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		27,229,062

As Adjusted	$	47,055,215

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)
GAAP	$	1,587,107
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		2,144,461

As Adjusted	$	3,731,568

Credit Card Loans
Total credit card loans
GAAP	$	20,230,302
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		27,229,062

As Adjusted	$	47,459,364

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)
GAAP	$	1,647,086
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		2,144,461

As Adjusted	$	3,791,547

Total Loans
Total loans
GAAP	$	23,625,084
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		27,229,062

As Adjusted	$	50,854,146

Allowance for loan losses (end of period)
GAAP	$	1,757,899
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		2,144,461

As Adjusted	$	3,902,360

Net loans
GAAP	$	21,867,185
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		25,084,601

As Adjusted	$	46,951,786

Loans over 30 days delinquent
GAAP	$	1,161,497	4.92	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		1,539,462	0.39

As Adjusted	$	2,700,959	5.31	%

Loans over 90 days delinquent and accruing interest
GAAP	$	522,190	2.21	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		694,864	0.18

As Adjusted	$	1,217,054	2.39	%

Loans not accruing interest
GAAP	$	190,086	0.80	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		248,192	0.06

As Adjusted	$	438,278	0.86	%


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009								For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
	Average Balances			Interest Income/Expense			Yield		Average Balances			Interest Income/Expense			Yield
	(dollars in thousands)								(dollars in thousands)
Average restricted cash
GAAP	$	—		$	—		—	%	$	—		$	—		—	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		2,537,305			3,996		0.62			2,391,937			15,359		0.86

As Adjusted	$	2,537,705		$	3,996		0.62	%	$	2,391,937		$	15,359		0.86	%

Average investment securities
GAAP	$	1,593,805		$	18,062		4.50	%	$	1,434,401		$	51,606		4.79	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(984,608	)		(10,539	)	0.40			(982,458	)		(33,191	)	0.64

As Adjusted	$	609,197		$	7,523		4.90	%	$	451,943		$	18,415		5.43	%

Average credit card loan receivables
GAAP	$	24,051,037		$	761,477		12.56	%	$	25,459,830		$	2,276,152		11.91	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		24,577,751			838,111		0.49			23,856,122			2,384,909		0.68

As Adjusted	$	48,628,788		$	1,599,588		13.05	%	$	49,315,952		$	4,661,061		12.59	%

Average total loan receivables
GAAP	$	26,380,203		$	804,874		12.10	%	$	27,454,927		$	2,395,423		11.62	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		24,577,751			838,111		0.69			23,856,122			2,384,909		0.79

As Adjusted	$	50,957,954		$	1,642,985		12.79	%	$	51,311,049		$	4,780,332		12.41	%

Average other interest-earning assets
GAAP	$	2,437,304		$	3,998		0.65	%	$	2,291,937		$	15,361		0.89	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(2,437,304	)		(3,998	)	(0.65	)		(2,291,937	)		(15,361	)	(0.89	)

As Adjusted	$	—		$	—		—	%	$	—		$	—		—	%

Average total interest-earning assets
GAAP	$	39,761,137		$	833,217		8.31	%	$	39,698,998		$	2,506,994		8.41	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		23,693,144			827,570		2.07			22,973,665			2,351,716		1.92

As Adjusted	$	63,454,281		$	1,660,787		10.38	%	$	62,672,663		$	4,858,710		10.33	%

Average allowance for loan losses
GAAP	$	(1,921,008	)						$	(1,824,834	)
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(1,833,584	)							(1,639,025	)

As Adjusted	$	(3,754,592	)						$	(3,463,859	)

Average other assets (non-interest bearing)
GAAP	$	4,332,432							$	3,580,461
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(978,343	)							(476,862	)

As Adjusted	$	3,354,089							$	3,103,599

Average total assets
GAAP	$	42,172,561							$	41,454,625
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		20,881,217								20,857,778

As Adjusted	$	63,053,778							$	62,312,403

Average securitized borrowings
GAAP	$	—		$	—		—	%	$	—		$	—		—	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		22,713,709			77,837		1.36			22,585,331			275,211		1.62

As Adjusted	$	22,713,709		$	77,837		1.36	%	$	22,585,331		$	275,211		1.62	%

Average total borrowings
GAAP	$	1,636,950		$	14,883		3.61	%	$	2,685,340		$	42,359		2.10	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		22,713,709			77,837		(2.10	)		22,585,331			275,211		(0.43	)

As Adjusted	$	24,350,659		$	92,720		1.51	%	$	25,270,671		$	317,570		1.67	%

Average total interest-bearing liabilities
GAAP	$	30,817,313		$	304,401		3.92	%	$	31,276,776		$	937,126		3.99	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		22,713,709			77,837		(1.09	)		22,585,331			275,211		(0.99	)

As Adjusted	$	53,531,022		$	382,238		2.83	%	$	53,862,107		$	1,212,337		3.00	%


	For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009			For the Nine Months Ended August 31, 2009
	Average Balances
	(dollars in thousands, except where noted)
Average other liabilities and stockholders’ equity (non-interest earning)
GAAP	$	11,355,248		$	10,177,849
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		(1,832,492	)		(1,727,553	)

As Adjusted	$	9,522,756		$	8,450,296

Average total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
GAAP	$	42,172,561		$	41,454,625
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		20,881,217			20,857,778

As Adjusted	$	63,053,778		$	62,312,403


	Ratios and Other Amounts
Net interest margin
GAAP		7.95	%		7.62	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		2.00			1.85

As Adjusted		9.95	%		9.47	%

Net yield on interest-earning assets
GAAP		5.28	%		5.27	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		2.71			2.48

As Adjusted		7.99	%		7.75	%

Interest rate spread
GAAP		4.40	%		4.42	%
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		3.15			2.91

As Adjusted		7.55	%		7.33	%

Amortization of balance transfer fees in interest income on credit card loans (dollars in millions)
GAAP	$	33		$	105
Adjustments for Statement No. 167		13			51

As Adjusted	$	46		$	156


	For the Three Months Ended August 31,
	2010							2009 (As Adjusted¹)
	Average Balance			Rate		Interest		Average Balance			Rate		Interest
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,352,952		0.25	%	$	5,326	$	9,349,825		0.27	%	$	6,283
Restricted cash		1,062,261		0.20	%		533		2,537,305		0.62	%		3,996
Other short-term investments		375,000		1.07	%		1,011		—		—			—
Investment securities		1,196,306		1.85	%		5,574		609,197		4.90	%		7,523
Loan receivables⁽²⁾:
Credit card⁽³⁾		44,905,220		12.86	%		1,455,907		48,628,788		13.05	%		1,599,588
Other⁽⁴⁾		4,782,080		5.61	%		67,588		2,329,166		7.39	%		43,397

Total loan receivables		49,687,300		12.16	%		1,523,495		50,957,954		12.79	%		1,642,985

Total interest-earning assets		60,673,819		10.04	%		1,535,939		63,454,281		10.38	%		1,660,787
Allowance for loan losses		(3,856,016	)						(3,754,592	)
Other assets		3,973,848							3,354,089

Total assets	$	60,791,651						$	63,053,778

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits:
Time deposits⁽⁵⁾	$	26,985,136		3.70	%		251,524	$	25,094,285		4.32	%		273,510
Money market deposits		3,936,681		1.52	%		15,105		3,935,227		1.54	%		15,299
Other interest-bearing deposits		3,485,724		1.42	%		12,508		150,851		1.86	%		709

Total interest-bearing deposits⁽⁶⁾		34,407,541		3.22	%		279,137		29,180,363		3.94	%		289,518
Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		—		—			—		16,304		0.24	%		10
Securitized borrowings		14,964,828		1.77	%		66,677		22,713,709		1.36	%		77,837
Other long-term borrowings		2,884,933		5.96	%		43,323		1,620,646		3.64	%		14,873

Total borrowings		17,849,761		2.44	%		110,000		24,350,659		1.51	%		92,720

Total interest-bearing liabilities		52,257,302		2.95	%		389,137		53,531,022		2.83	%		382,238
Other liabilities and stockholders’ equity		8,534,349							9,522,756

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	60,791,651						$	63,053,778

Net interest income						$	1,146,802						$	1,278,549

Net interest margin⁽⁷⁾				9.16	%						9.95	%
Net yield on interest-earning assets⁽⁸⁾				7.50	%						7.99	%
Interest rate spread⁽⁹⁾				7.09	%						7.55	%


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽²⁾	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs⁽¹⁾	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
June 1 – 30, 2010
Repurchase program⁽¹⁾	—	$	—	—	$	1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾	1,937	$	14.37	N/A		N/A
July 1 – 31, 2010
Repurchase program⁽¹⁾	—	$	—	—	$	1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾	175,145	$	13.84	N/A		N/A
August 1 – 31, 2010
Repurchase program⁽¹⁾	—	$	—	—	$	1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾	13,728	$	15.11	N/A		N/A

Total
Repurchase program⁽¹⁾	—	$	—	—	$	1 billion
Employee transactions⁽²⁾	190,810	$	13.93	N/A		N/A