UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-32195

LOGO

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		33-1073076
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6620 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia		23230
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(804) 281-6000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~July 25, 2011, 490,716,493~~May 1, 2012, 491,502,704 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3

Item 1.	Financial Statements		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (Unaudited)		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ (Unaudited)		3
	~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010~~		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Changes in Stockholders’ Equity~~Comprehensive Income for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ (Unaudited)		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Cash Flows~~Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ (Unaudited)		6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)		7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		78

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		6669

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		~~137~~132

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		~~137~~132

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION			~~138~~133

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		~~138~~133

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		~~139~~134

~~Item 5.~~	~~Other Information~~		~~139~~

Item 6.	Exhibits		~~140~~135

Signatures			~~141~~136

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENTS OF INCOME~~BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

   Three months ended
June 30, Six months ended
June 30,
   2011 2010 2011 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 1,455    $ 1,470    $ 2,892    $ 2,940
Net investment income
   881    823    1,711    1,588
Net investment gains (losses)
   (40 ) (139 ) (68 ) (209 )
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   359    256    688    512

Total revenues
   2,655    2,410    5,223    4,831

Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   1,672    1,340    3,081    2,655
Interest credited
   204    211    405    424
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   514    499    1,014    974
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   197    179    382    363
Interest expense
   134    109    261    224

Total benefits and expenses
   2,721    2,338    5,143    4,640

Income (loss) before income taxes
   (66 ) 72    80    191
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
   (6 ) (5 ) 24    (98 )

Net income (loss)
   (60 ) 77    56    289
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
   36    35    70    69

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ (96 ) $ 42    $ (14 ) $ 220

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:

Basic
   $ (0.20 ) $ 0.09    $ (0.03 ) $ 0.45

Diluted
   $ (0.20 ) $ 0.08    $ (0.03 ) $ 0.45

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

Basic
   490.6    489.1    490.4    489.0

Diluted
   490.6    494.2    490.4    493.9

Supplemental disclosures:

Total other-than-temporary impairments
   $ (28 ) $ (24 ) $ (59 ) $ (101 )
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments included in other comprehensive income (loss)
   2    (27 ) (3 ) (30 )

Net other-than-temporary impairments
   (26 ) (51 ) (62 ) (131 )
Other investment gains (losses)
   (14 ) (88 ) (6 ) (78 )

Total net investment gains (losses)
   $ (40 ) $ (139 ) $ (68 ) $ (209 )


	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	58,532		$	58,295
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value		434			361
Commercial mortgage loans		6,030			6,092
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		392			411
Policy loans		1,555			1,549
Other invested assets		3,001			4,819
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities ($383 and $376 at fair value)		384			377

Total investments		70,328			71,904
Cash and cash equivalents		4,187			4,488
Accrued investment income		759			691
Deferred acquisition costs		5,060			5,193
Intangible assets		573			580
Goodwill		1,256			1,253
Reinsurance recoverable		17,193			16,998
Other assets		981			958
Separate account assets		10,646			10,122

Total assets	$	110,983		$	112,187

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	32,380		$	32,175
Policyholder account balances		26,204			26,345
Liability for policy and contract claims		7,663			7,620
Unearned premiums		4,209			4,223
Other liabilities ($174 and $210 other liabilities related to securitization entities)		5,308			6,308
Borrowings related to securitization entities ($55 and $48 at fair value)		383			396
Non-recourse funding obligations		2,602			3,256
Long-term borrowings		5,095			4,726
Deferred tax liability		610			838
Separate account liabilities		10,646			10,122

Total liabilities		95,100			96,009

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 1.5 billion shares authorized; 580 million and 579 million shares issued as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively; 491 million shares outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		1			1
Additional paid-in capital		12,150			12,136

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized investment gains (losses):
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		1,438			1,617
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		(111	)		(132	)

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		1,327			1,485

Derivatives qualifying as hedges		1,680			2,009
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		649			553

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		3,656			4,047
Retained earnings		1,631			1,584
Treasury stock, at cost (88 million shares as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		(2,700	)		(2,700	)

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity		14,738			15,068
Noncontrolling interests		1,145			1,110

Total stockholders’ equity		15,883			16,178

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	110,983		$	112,187

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~BALANCE SHEETS~~STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

June 30,
2011 December 31,
2010
(Unaudited)
Assets

Investments:

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value
$ 56,221    $ 55,183
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value
374    332
Commercial mortgage loans
6,432    6,718
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities
457    507
Policy loans
1,542    1,471
Other invested assets
3,301    3,854
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities ($378 and $370 at fair value)
379    372

Total investments
68,706    68,437
Cash and cash equivalents
2,831    3,132
Accrued investment income
693    733
Deferred acquisition costs
7,362    7,256
Intangible assets
692    741
Goodwill
1,333    1,329
Reinsurance recoverable
16,999    17,191
Other assets
988    810
Deferred tax asset
1,291    1,100
Separate account assets
11,452    11,666

Total assets
$ 112,347    $ 112,395

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Liabilities:

Future policy benefits
$ 31,177    $ 30,717
Policyholder account balances
26,115    26,978
Liability for policy and contract claims
7,327    6,933
Unearned premiums
4,563    4,541
Other liabilities ($145 and $150 other liabilities related to securitization entities)
5,637    6,085
Borrowings related to securitization entities ($58 and $51 at fair value)
452    494
Non-recourse funding obligations
3,374    3,437
Long-term borrowings
4,755    4,952
Deferred tax liability
1,937    1,621
Separate account liabilities
11,452    11,666

Total liabilities
96,789    97,424

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; 1.5 billion shares authorized; 579 million and 578 million shares issued as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively; 491 million and 490 million shares outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
1    1
Additional paid-in capital
12,110    12,095

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

Net unrealized investment gains (losses):

Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired
352    21
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities
(116 ) (121 )

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)
236    (100 )

Derivatives qualifying as hedges
943    924
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments
883    668

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
2,062    1,492
Retained earnings
2,959    2,973
Treasury stock, at cost (88 million shares as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010)
(2,700 ) (2,700 )

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity
14,432    13,861
Noncontrolling interests
1,126    1,110

Total stockholders’ equity
15,558    14,971

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$ 112,347    $ 112,395


	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1,107		$	1,437
Net investment income		832			830
Net investment gains (losses)		35			(28	)
Insurance and investment product fees and other		452			329

Total revenues		2,426			2,568

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1,232			1,413
Interest credited		195			201
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		530			563
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		272			151
Interest expense		95			127

Total benefits and expenses		2,324			2,455

Income before income taxes		102			113
Provision for income taxes		22			20

Net income		80			93
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		33			34

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	47		$	59

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:
Basic	$	0.09		$	0.12

Diluted	$	0.09		$	0.12

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		491.2			490.1

Diluted		495.7			494.4

Supplemental disclosures:
Total other-than-temporary impairments	$	(16	)	$	(31	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments included in other comprehensive income (loss)		(1	)		(5	)

Net other-than-temporary impairments		(17	)		(36	)
Other investments gains (losses)		52			8

Total net investment gains (losses)	$	35		$	(28	)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Net income	$	80		$	93
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		(185	)		50
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		21			7
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		(329	)		(60	)
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		116			152

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(377	)		149

Total comprehensive income (loss)		(297	)		242
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		47			54

Total comprehensive income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(344	)	$	188

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Amounts in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Retained earnings			Treasury stock, at cost			Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity			Noncontrolling interests			Total stockholders’ equity			Common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Retained earnings		Treasury stock, at cost			Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity			Noncontrolling interests			Total stockholders’ equity
Balances as of December 31, 2010	$	1	$	12,095	$	1,492		$	2,973		$	(2,700	)	$	13,861		$	1,110		$	14,971
Balances as of December 31, 2011																							$	1	$	12,136	$	4,047		$	1,584	$	(2,700	)	$	15,068		$	1,110		$	16,178

Repurchase of subsidiary shares		—		—		—			—			—			—			(71	)		(71	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			(14	)		—			(14	)		70			56
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		—		—		331			��			—			331			5			336
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		—		—		5			—			—			5			—			5
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		—		—		19			—			—			19			—			19
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		—		—		215			—			—			215			36			251

Total comprehensive income (loss)																					667
Dividends to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			(24	)		(24	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises and other		—		15		—			—			—			15			—			15

Balances as of June 30, 2011	$	1	$	12,110	$	2,062		$	2,959		$	(2,700	)	$	14,432		$	1,126		$	15,558

Balances as of December 31, 2009	$	1	$	12,034	$	(164	)	$	3,105		$	(2,700	)	$	12,276		$	1,074		$	13,350

Cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of taxes and other adjustments		—		—		91			(104	)		—			(13	)		—			(13	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		—		—		—			220			—			220			69			289			—		—		—			47		—			47			33			80
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		—		—		1,268			—			—			1,268			9			1,277			—		—		(179	)		—		—			(179	)		(6	)		(185	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		—		—		68			—			—			68			—			68			—		—		21			—		—			21			—			21
Derivatives qualifying as hedges		—		—		360			—			—			360			—			360			—		—		(329	)		—		—			(329	)		—			(329	)
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		—		—		(292	)		—			—			(292	)		(15	)		(307	)		—		—		96			—		—			96			20			116

Total comprehensive income (loss)																					1,687															(344	)		47			(297	)
Dividends to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			(21	)		(21	)		—		—		—			—		—			—			(12	)		(12	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises and other		—		24		—			—			—			24			—			24			—		14		—			—		—			14			—			14
Other capital transactions		—		20		—			—			—			20			—			20

Balances as of June 30, 2010	$	1	$	12,078	$	1,331		$	3,221		$	(2,700	)	$	13,931		$	1,116		$	15,047
Balances as of March 31, 2012																							$	1	$	12,150	$	3,656		$	1,631	$	(2,700	)	$	14,738		$	1,145		$	15,883

Balances as of December 31, 2010																							$	1	$	12,107	$	1,506		$	1,535	$	(2,700	)	$	12,449		$	1,096		$	13,545

Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income																								—		—		—			59		—			59			34			93
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired																								—		—		59			—		—			59			(9	)		50
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities																								—		—		7			—		—			7			—			7
Derivatives qualifying as hedges																								—		—		(60	)		—		—			(60	)		—			(60	)
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments																								—		—		123			—		—			123			29			152

Total comprehensive income (loss)																																				188			54			242
Dividends to noncontrolling interests																								—		—		—			—		—			—			(12	)		(12	)
Stock-based compensation expense and exercises and other																								—		6		—			—		—			6			—			6

Balances as of March 31, 2011																							$	1	$	12,113	$	1,635		$	1,594	$	(2,700	)	$	12,643		$	1,138		$	13,781

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in millions)

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2010			2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	56		$	289		$	80		$	93
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Amortization of fixed maturity discounts and premiums and limited partnerships		(53	)		5			(19	)		(18	)
Net investment losses (gains)		68			209			(35	)		28
Charges assessed to policyholders		(327	)		(233	)		(187	)		(159	)
Acquisition costs deferred		(449	)		(392	)		(154	)		(166	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		382			363			272			151
Deferred income taxes		(85	)		(173	)		26			(47	)
Net increase in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments		79			119
Net increase (decrease) in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments								(45	)		35
Stock-based compensation expense		16			23			9			7
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets		(83	)		24			(112	)		(117	)
Insurance reserves		1,281			1,208			369			561
Current tax liabilities		5			(211	)		(86	)		25
Other liabilities and other policy-related balances		(48	)		(674	)		(370	)		(57	)

Net cash from operating activities		842			557			(252	)		336

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments of investments:
Fixed maturity securities		3,069			2,057			969			1,627
Commercial mortgage loans		411			263			142			148
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		49			27			14			22
Proceeds from sales of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		1,893			2,393			1,717			1,009
Purchases and originations of investments:
Fixed maturity and equity securities		(5,183	)		(6,867	)		(3,049	)		(2,200	)
Commercial mortgage loans		(142	)		(23	)		(81	)		(38	)
Other invested assets, net		(28	)		1,491			436			(59	)
Policy loans, net		(71	)		(64	)		(6	)		(9	)
Payments for businesses purchased, net of cash acquired		(4	)		—			(18	)		(4	)

Net cash from investing activities		(6	)		(723	)		124			496

Cash flows from financing activities:
Deposits to universal life and investment contracts		1,221			1,174			662			560
Withdrawals from universal life and investment contracts		(2,123	)		(1,734	)		(600	)		(1,115	)
Short-term borrowings and other, net		137			(285	)
Redemption and repurchase of non-recourse funding obligations		(45	)		(6	)		(563	)		(6	)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt		545			660			361			397
Repayment and repurchase of long-term debt		(760	)		—
Repayment of borrowings related to securitization entities		(49	)		(31	)		(19	)		(12	)
Repurchase of subsidiary shares		(71	)		—
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		(24	)		(21	)		(12	)		(12	)
Other, net								(18	)		(33	)

Net cash from financing activities		(1,169	)		(243	)		(189	)		(221	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		32			(7	)		16			(1	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(301	)		(416	)		(301	)		610
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		3,132			5,002			4,488			3,132

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2,831		$	4,586		$	4,187		$	3,742

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1) Formation of Genworth and Basis of Presentation

Genworth Financial, Inc. (“Genworth”) was incorporated in Delaware on October 23, 2003. The accompanying condensed financial statements include on a consolidated basis the accounts of Genworth and our affiliate companies in which we hold a majority voting interest or where we are the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, which we refer to as the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” unless the context otherwise requires. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have the following ~~three~~ operating segments:

•

~~International.~~International Protection. We ~~offer mortgage and~~are a leading provider of payment protection coverages (referred to as lifestyle protection) in multiple European countries. Our lifestyle protection insurance products primarily help consumers meet specified payment obligations should they become unable to pay due to accident, illness, involuntary unemployment, disability or death.

•

Wealth Management. We offer and ~~related~~manage a variety of wealth management services, ~~in multiple markets.~~including investments, advisor support and practice management services.

•

International Mortgage Insurance. We are a leading provider of mortgage insurance products and related services in Canada, Australia, Mexico and multiple European countries. Our products predominantly insure prime-based, individually underwritten residential mortgage loans, also known as flow mortgage insurance. On a limited basis, we also provide mortgage insurance on a structured, or bulk, basis that aids in the sale of mortgages to the capital markets and helps lenders manage capital and risk. ~~We are a leading provider of protection coverages primarily associated with certain financial obligations (referred~~Additionally, we offer services, analytical tools and technology that enable lenders to as lifestyle protection) in multiple European countries. These lifestyle protection insurance products primarily help consumers meet specified payment obligations should they become unable to pay due to accident, illness, involuntary unemployment, disability or death.operate efficiently and manage risk.

•

~~In January 2011, we discontinued new sales of retail and group variable annuities while continuing to service our existing blocks of business. We continue to offer fixed annuities.~~

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Actual results could differ from those estimates. These condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments considered necessary by management to present a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results reported in these condensed consolidated

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

(2) Accounting ~~Pronouncements~~

~~Recently Adopted~~Changes

On January 1, ~~2011,~~2012, we adopted new accounting guidance related to goodwill impairment testing when a reporting unit’s carrying value is zero or negative. This guidance did not impact our consolidated financial statements upon adoption, as all of our reporting units with goodwill balances have positive carrying values.

On January 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance related to how investments held through separate accounts affect an insurer’s consolidation analysis of those investments. The adoption of this new accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On January 1, 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance related to additional disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this new accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

~~Not Yet Adopted~~

~~In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued~~ new accounting guidance requiring presentation of the components of net income (loss), the components of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) and total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income (loss) or in two separate but consecutive statements. ~~This~~We chose to present two separate but consecutive statements and adopted this new guidance retrospectively. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment relating to this new guidance for presentation of the reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income that removed this requirement until further guidance is issued. The adoption of this new accounting guidance ~~is effective for us on January 1, 2012. We do~~did not ~~expect the adoption of this accounting guidance to~~ have ~~a material~~any impact on our consolidated financial results.

~~In May 2011, the FASB issued~~On January 1, 2012, we adopted new accounting guidance ~~for~~related to fair value measurements. This new accounting guidance ~~clarifies~~clarified existing fair value measurement requirements and ~~changes~~changed certain fair value measurement principles and disclosure ~~requirements that will be effective for us on January 1, 2012. We have not yet determined the impact this accounting guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In April 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings. This new accounting guidance and related disclosures will be effective for us on July 1, 2011.~~requirements. The adoption of this accounting guidance ~~will~~did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In April 2011, the FASB issued~~On January 1, 2012, we adopted new accounting guidance ~~for~~related to repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The new guidance ~~removes~~removed the requirement to consider a transferor’s ability to fulfill its contractual rights from the criteria ~~when determining~~used to determine effective control and iswas effective for us prospectively tofor any transactions occurring on or after January 1, 2012. ~~We do not expect the~~The adoption of this accounting guidance todid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In October 2010, the FASB issued~~On January 1, 2012, we adopted new accounting guidance related to accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. Acquisition costs include costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition of our insurance policies and investment contracts, which are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the related insurance policies. These costs include commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions and for contracts and policies issued some support costs, such as underwriting, medical inspection and issuance expenses. Deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) are subsequently amortized to expense over the lives of the underlying contracts, in relation to the anticipated recognition of premiums or gross profits. We adopted this new guidance retrospectively, which reduced retained earnings and stockholders’ equity by $1.3 billion as of January 1, 2011, and reduced net income (loss) by $63 million, $86 million and $12 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. This new ~~accounting~~ guidance ~~will be effective~~results in lower amortization and fewer deferred costs, specifically related to underwriting, inspection and processing for ~~us on~~contracts that are not issued, as well as marketing and customer solicitation.

Effective January 1, ~~2012. When adopted,~~2012, we ~~expect to defer fewer costs. The new guidance is effective prospectively with~~changed our treatment of the liability for future policy benefits for our level premium term life insurance products when the liability for a policy falls below zero. Previously, the total liability for future policy benefits included negative reserves calculated at an individual policy level. Through

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~retrospective adoption allowed.~~ 2010, we issued level premium term life insurance policies whose premiums are contractually determined to be level through a period of time and then increase thereafter. Our previous accounting policy followed the accounting for traditional, long-duration insurance contracts where the reserves are calculated as the present value of expected benefit payments minus the present value of net premiums based on assumptions determined on the policy issuance date including mortality, interest, and lapse rates. This accounting has the effect of causing profits to emerge as a level percentage of premiums, subject to differences in assumed versus actual experience which flow through income as they occur, and for products with an increasing premium stream, such as the level premium term life insurance product, may result in negative reserves for a given policy.

More recent insurance-specific accounting guidance reflects a different accounting philosophy, emphasizing the balance sheet over the income statement, or matching, focus which was the philosophy in place when the traditional, long-duration insurance contract guidance was issued (the accounting model for traditional, long-duration insurance contracts draws upon the principles of matching and conservatism originating in the 1970’s, and does not specifically address negative reserves). More recent accounting models for long-duration contracts specifically prohibit negative reserves, e.g., non-traditional contracts with annuitization benefits and certain participating contracts. These recent accounting models do not impact the reserving for our level premium term life insurance products.

We ~~intend~~believe that industry accounting practices for level premium term life insurance product reserving is mixed with some companies “flooring” reserves at zero and others applying our previous accounting policy described above. In 2010, we stopped issuing new level premium term life insurance policies. Thus, as the level premium term policies reach the end of their level premium term periods, the portion of policies with negative reserves in relation to ~~adopt~~the reserve for all level premium term life insurance products will continue to increase. Our new method of accounting floors the liability for future policy benefits on each level premium term life insurance policy at zero. We believe that flooring reserves at zero is preferable in our circumstances as this alternative accounting policy will not allow negative reserves to accumulate on the balance sheet for this closed block of insurance policies. In implementing this change in accounting, no changes were made to the assumptions that were locked-in at policy inception. We implemented this accounting change retrospectively, which reduced retained earnings and stockholders’ equity by $110 million as of January 1, 2011, and reduced net income (loss) by $10 million, $4 million and $32 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 reflecting the impact of the accounting changes that were retrospectively adopted on January 1, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	As Originally Reported			Effect of DAC Change			Effect of Reserve Change			As Adjusted
Assets
Total investments	$	71,904		$	—		$	—		$	71,904
Cash and cash equivalents		4,488			—			—			4,488
Accrued investment income		691			—			—			691
Deferred acquisition costs		7,327			(2,134	)		—			5,193
Intangible assets		577			3			—			580
Goodwill		1,253			—			—			1,253
Reinsurance recoverable		16,982			—			16			16,998
Other assets		958			—			—			958
Separate account assets		10,122			—			—			10,122

Total assets	$	114,302		$	(2,131	)	$	16		$	112,187

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	31,971		$	3		$	201		$	32,175
Policyholder account balances		26,345			—			—			26,345
Liability for policy and contract claims		7,620			—			—			7,620
Unearned premiums		4,257			(34	)		—			4,223
Other liabilities		6,308			—			—			6,308
Borrowings related to securitization entities		396			—			—			396
Non-recourse funding obligations		3,256			—			—			3,256
Long-term borrowings		4,726			—			—			4,726
Deferred tax liability		1,636			(733	)		(65	)		838
Separate account liabilities		10,122			—			—			10,122

Total liabilities		96,637			(764	)		136			96,009

Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock		1			—			—			1
Additional paid-in capital		12,124			12			—			12,136
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized investment gains (losses):
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		1,586			31			—			1,617
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		(132	)		—			—			(132	)

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		1,454			31			—			1,485

Derivatives qualifying as hedges		2,009			—			—			2,009
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		558			(5	)		—			553

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		4,021			26			—			4,047
Retained earnings		3,095			(1,391	)		(120	)		1,584
Treasury stock, at cost		(2,700	)		—			—			(2,700	)

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity		16,541			(1,353	)		(120	)		15,068
Noncontrolling interests		1,124			(14	)		—			1,110

Total stockholders’ equity		17,665			(1,367	)		(120	)		16,178

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	114,302		$	(2,131	)	$	16		$	112,187

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflecting the impact of the accounting changes that were retrospectively adopted on January 1, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	As Originally Reported			Effect of DAC Change			Effect of Reserve Change			As Adjusted
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1,437		$	—		$	—		$	1,437
Net investment income		830			—			—			830
Net investment gains (losses)		(28	)		—			—			(28	)
Insurance and investment product fees and other		329			—			—			329

Total revenues		2,568			—			—			2,568

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1,409			—			4			1,413
Interest credited		201			—			—			201
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		500			63			—			563
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		185			(34	)		—			151
Interest expense		127			—			—			127

Total benefits and expenses		2,422			29			4			2,455

Income before income taxes		146			(29	)		(4	)		113
Provision for income taxes		30			(9	)		(1	)		20

Net income		116			(20	)		(3	)		93
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		34			—			—			34

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	82		$	(20	)	$	(3	)	$	59

The following table presents the cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflecting the impact of the accounting changes that were retrospectively adopted on January 1, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	As Originally Reported			Effect of DAC Change			Effect of Reserve Change			As Adjusted
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	116		$	(20	)	$	(3	)	$	93
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Amortization of fixed maturity discounts and premiums and limited partnerships		(18	)		—			—			(18	)
Net investment losses		28			—			—			28
Charges assessed to policyholders		(159	)		—			—			(159	)
Acquisition costs deferred		(229	)		63			—			(166	)
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		185			(34	)		—			151
Deferred income taxes		(37	)		(9	)		(1	)		(47	)
Net increase in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments		35			—			—			35
Stock-based compensation expense		7			—			—			7
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets		(117	)		—			—			(117	)
Insurance reserves		557			—			4			561
Current tax liabilities		25			—			—			25
Other liabilities and policy-related balances		(57	)		—			—			(57	)

Net cash from operating activities	$	336		$	—		$	—		$	336

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the balance sheet as of March 31, 2012 to reflect the impact of the accounting change related to reserves that was adopted on January 1, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	As Reported Under New Policy			As Computed Under Previous Policy			Effect of Change
Assets
Total investments	$	70,328		$	70,328		$	—
Cash and cash equivalents		4,187			4,187			—
Accrued investment income		759			759			—
Deferred acquisition costs		5,060			5,060			—
Intangible assets		573			573			—
Goodwill		1,256			1,256			—
Reinsurance recoverable		17,193			17,177			16
Other assets		981			981			—
Separate account assets		10,646			10,646			—

Total assets	$	110,983		$	110,967		$	16

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	32,380		$	32,172		$	208
Policyholder account balances		26,204			26,204			—
Liability for policy and contract claims		7,663			7,663			—
Unearned premiums		4,209			4,209			—
Other liabilities		5,308			5,308			—
Borrowings related to securitization entities		383			383			—
Non-recourse funding obligations		2,602			2,602			—
Long-term borrowings		5,095			5,095			—
Deferred tax liability		610			677			(67	)
Separate account liabilities		10,646			10,646			—

Total liabilities		95,100			94,959			141

Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock		1			1			—
Additional paid-in capital		12,150			12,150			—
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized investment gains (losses):
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired		1,438			1,438			—
Net unrealized gains (losses) on other-than-temporarily impaired securities		(111	)		(111	)		—

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		1,327			1,327			—

Derivatives qualifying as hedges		1,680			1,680			—
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments		649			649			—

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		3,656			3,656			—
Retained earnings		1,631			1,756			(125	)
Treasury stock, at cost		(2,700	)		(2,700	)		—

Total Genworth Financial, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity		14,738			14,863			(125	)
Noncontrolling interests		1,145			1,145			—

Total stockholders’ equity		15,883			16,008			(125	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	110,983		$	110,967		$	16

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to reflect the impact of the accounting change related to reserves that was adopted on January 1, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	As Reported Under New Policy		As Computed Under Previous Policy		Effect of Change
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1,107	$	1,107	$	—
Net investment income		832		832		—
Net investment gains (losses)		35		35		—
Insurance and investment product fees and other		452		452		—

Total revenues		2,426		2,426		—

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1,232		1,225		(7	)
Interest credited		195		195		—
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		530		530		—
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		272		272		—
Interest expense		95		95		—

Total benefits and expenses		2,324		2,317		(7	)

Income before income taxes		102		109		(7	)
Provision for income taxes		22		24		2

Net income		80		85		(5	)
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		33		33		—

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	47	$	52	$	(5	)

The following table presents the net cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to reflect the impact of the accounting change related to reserves that was adopted on January 1, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	As Reported Under New Policy			As Computed Under Previous Policy			Effect of Change
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	80		$	85		$	(5	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Amortization of fixed maturity discounts and premiums and limited partnerships		(19	)		(19	)		—
Net investment losses		(35	)		(35	)		—
Charges assessed to policyholders		(187	)		(187	)		—
Acquisition costs deferred		(154	)		(154	)		—
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		272			272			—
Deferred income taxes		26			28			(2	)
Net decrease in trading securities, held-for-sale investments and derivative instruments		(45	)		(45	)		—
Stock-based compensation expense		9			9			—
Change in certain assets and liabilities:
Accrued investment income and other assets		(112	)		(112	)		—
Insurance reserves		369			362			7
Current tax liabilities		(86	)		(86	)		—
Other liabilities and policy-related balances		(370	)		(370	)		—

Net cash from operating activities	$	(252	)	$	(252	)	$	—

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The new guidance ~~retrospectively. We~~requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. These new disclosure requirements will be effective for us on January 1, 2013 and are not expected to have ~~not yet determined the~~a material impact ~~this accounting guidance will have~~ on our consolidated financial statements.

(3) Earnings ~~(Loss)~~ Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share are calculated by dividing each income ~~(loss)~~ category presented below by the weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,					Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)	2011			2010		2011			2010		2012		2011
Net income (loss)	$	(60	)	$	77	$	56		$	289
Net income											$	80	$	93
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		36			35		70			69		33		34

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(96	)	$	42	$	(14	)	$	220
Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders											$	47	$	59

Basic per common share:
Net income (loss)	$	(0.12	)	$	0.16	$	0.11		$	0.59
Net income											$	0.16	$	0.19
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.07			0.07		0.14			0.14		0.07		0.07

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders⁽¹⁾	$	(0.20	)	$	0.09	$	(0.03	)	$	0.45
Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders⁽¹⁾											$	0.09	$	0.12

Diluted per common share:
Net income (loss)	$	(0.12	)	$	0.16	$	0.11		$	0.59
Net income											$	0.16	$	0.19
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.07			0.07		0.14			0.14		0.07		0.07

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders⁽¹⁾	$	(0.20	)	$	0.08	$	(0.03	)	$	0.45
Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders⁽¹⁾											$	0.09	$	0.12

Weighted-average shares used in basic earnings per common share calculations		490.6			489.1		490.4			489.0		491.2		490.1
Potentially dilutive securities:
Stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights		—			5.1		—			4.9		4.5		4.3

Weighted-average shares used in diluted earnings per common share calculations⁽²⁾		490.6			494.2		490.4			493.9		495.7		494.4

⁽¹⁾	May not total due to whole number calculation.

⁽²⁾

Under applicable accounting guidance, companies in a loss position are required to use basic weighted-average common shares outstanding in the calculation of diluted loss per share. Therefore, as a result of our net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we were required to use basic weighted-average common shares outstanding in the calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 diluted loss per share, as the inclusion of shares for stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights of 3.7 million and 4.0 million, respectively, would have been antidilutive to the calculation. If we had not incurred a net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, dilutive potential common shares would have been 494.3 million and 494.4 million, respectively.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(4) Investments

(a) Net Investment Income

Sources of net investment income were as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011
Fixed maturity securities—taxable	$	693		$	646		$	1,363		$	1,272		$	660		$	670
Fixed maturity securities—non-taxable		10			16			21			32			4			11
Commercial mortgage loans		92			99			184			203			84			92
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		9			10			19			20			9			10
Equity securities		10			5			13			7			4			3
Other invested assets		55			39			89			37			53			34
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		—			—			—			1
Policy loans		30			28			59			55			31			29
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments		6			4			12			9			10			6

Gross investment income before expenses and fees		905			847			1,760			1,636			855			855
Expenses and fees		(24	)		(24	)		(49	)		(48	)		(23	)		(25	)

Net investment income	$	881		$	823		$	1,711		$	1,588		$	832		$	830

(b) Net Investment Gains (Losses)

The following table sets forth net investment gains (losses) for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011
Available-for-sale securities:
Realized gains	$	25		$	53		$	54		$	76		$	63		$	29
Realized losses		(34	)		(36	)		(65	)		(74	)		(46	)		(31	)

Net realized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities		(9	)		17			(11	)		2			17			(2	)

Impairments:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(28	)		(24	)		(59	)		(101	)		(16	)		(31	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments included in other comprehensive income (loss)		2			(27	)		(3	)		(30	)		(1	)		(5	)

Net other-than-temporary impairments		(26	)		(51	)		(62	)		(131	)		(17	)		(36	)

Trading securities		14			(4	)		25			2			(25	)		11
Commercial mortgage loans		2			(18	)		1			(22	)		2			(1	)
Net gains (losses) related to securitization entities		(5	)		(47	)		5			(36	)		34			10
Derivative instruments⁽¹⁾		(15	)		(38	)		(25	)		(46	)		26			(10	)
Other		(1	)		2			(1	)		22
Contingent purchase price valuation change														(2	)		—

Net investment gains (losses)	$	(40	)	$	(139	)	$	(68	)	$	(209	)	$	35		$	(28	)

⁽¹⁾	See note 5 for additional information on the impact of derivative instruments included in net investment gains (losses).

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

We generally intend to hold securities in unrealized loss positions until they recover. However, from time to time, our intent on an individual security may change, based upon market or other unforeseen developments. In such instances, we sell securities in the ordinary course of managing our portfolio to meet diversification, credit quality, yield and liquidity requirements. If a loss is recognized from a sale subsequent to a balance sheet date due to these unexpected developments, the loss is recognized in the period in which we determined that we have the intent to sell the securities or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the securities prior to recovery. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the ~~three months~~periods ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ was ~~$294~~$357 million and ~~$858~~$397 million, respectively, which was approximately ~~91%~~90% and 96%, respectively, of book value. The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $691 million and $1,416 million, respectively, which was approximately 93% and 95%94%, respectively, of book value.

The following represents the activity for credit losses recognized in net income ~~(loss)~~ on debt securities where an other-than-temporary impairment was identified and a portion of other-than-temporary impairments was included in OCI as of orand for the ~~periods indicated:~~three months ended March 31:


	As of or for the three months ended June 30,						As of or for the six months ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011
Beginning balance	$	755		$	1,025		$	784		$	1,059		$	646		$	784
Additions:
Other-than-temporary impairments not previously recognized		1			11			4			31			2			3
Increases related to other-than-temporary impairments previously recognized		17			32			48			78			13			31
Reductions:
Securities sold, paid down or disposed		(47	)		(90	)		(110	)		(190	)		(51	)		(63	)

Ending balance	$	726		$	978		$	726		$	978		$	610		$	755

(c) Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses

Net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investment securities reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows as of the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:
Fixed maturity securities	$	1,141		$	511		$	3,515		$	3,742
Equity securities		21			9			14			5
Other invested assets		(24	)		(22	)		(24	)		(30	)

Subtotal		1,138			498			3,505			3,717
Adjustments to deferred acquisition costs, present value of future profits, sales inducements and benefit reserves		(694	)		(583	)		(1,348	)		(1,303	)
Income taxes, net		(153	)		35			(747	)		(840	)

Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		291			(50	)		1,410			1,574
Less: net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests		55			50			83			89

Net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to Genworth Financial, Inc.	$	236		$	(100	)	$	1,327		$	1,485

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The change in net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investment securities reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was as follows as of orand for the ~~periods indicated:~~three months ended March 31:


	As of or for the three months ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2012			2011
Beginning balance	$	(37	)	$	(860	)	$	1,485		$	(80	)
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period:
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities		555			1,498			(212	)		12
Adjustment to deferred acquisition costs		(36	)		(80	)		(47	)		(17	)
Adjustment to present value of future profits		(15	)		(51	)		11			(1	)
Adjustment to sales inducements		(3	)		(10	)		(10	)		(4	)
Adjustment to benefit reserves		(94	)		—			1			63
Provision for income taxes		(142	)		(480	)		93			(21	)

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities		265			877			(164	)		32
Reclassification adjustments to net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes of $(13) and $(11)		22			22
Reclassification adjustments to net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes of $— and $(13)								—			25

Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)		287			899			(164	)		57
Less: change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests		14			10
Less: change in net unrealized investment (gains) losses attributable to noncontrolling interests								6			9

Ending balance	$	236		$	29		$	1,327		$	(14	)

(d) Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities

As of March 31, 2012, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:

   As of or for the
six months ended
June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010
Beginning balance
   $ (100 ) $ (1,398 )
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
   —      91
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period:

Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
   567    2,261
Adjustment to deferred acquisition costs
   (57 ) (193 )
Adjustment to present value of future profits
   (16 ) (81 )
Adjustment to sales inducements
   (7 ) (26 )
Adjustment to benefit reserves
   (31 ) —
Provision for income taxes
   (162 ) (700 )

Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
   294    1,261
Reclassification adjustments to net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes of $(26) and $(45)
   47    84

Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)
   341    1,436
Less: change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests
   5    9

Ending balance
   $ 236    $ 29


			Gross unrealized gains				Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Not other-than- temporarily impaired		Other-than- temporarily impaired		Not other- than- temporarily impaired			Other-than- temporarily impaired			Fair value
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3,893	$	687	$	—	$	(6	)	$	—		$	4,574
Tax-exempt		379		13		—		(51	)		—			341
Government—non-U.S.		2,103		189		—		(1	)		—			2,291
U.S. corporate		23,121		2,283		17		(213	)		(1	)		25,207
Corporate—non-U.S.		13,760		807		—		(125	)		—			14,442
Residential mortgage-backed		5,807		436		9		(235	)		(165	)		5,852
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,407		137		5		(161	)		(42	)		3,346
Other asset-backed		2,544		25		—		(88	)		(2	)		2,479

Total fixed maturity securities		55,014		4,577		31		(880	)		(210	)		58,532
Equity securities		419		22		—		(7	)		—			434

Total available-for-sale securities	$	55,433	$	4,599	$	31	$	(887	)	$	(210	)	$	58,966

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~(d) Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities~~

As of ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2011, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:

(Amounts in millions)
Amortized
cost or
cost Gross unrealized gains Gross unrealized losses Fair
value
Not other-than-
temporarily
impaired Other-than-
temporarily
impaired Not other-than-
temporarily
impaired Other-than-
temporarily
impaired
Fixed maturity securities:

U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises
$ 3,548    $ 153    $ —      $ (19 ) $ —      $ 3,682
Tax-exempt
940    19    —      (94 ) —      865
Government—non-U.S.
2,265    128    —      (4 ) —      2,389
U.S. corporate
23,081    1,260    13    (307 ) —      24,047
Corporate—non-U.S.
14,038    530    —      (139 ) (1 ) 14,428
Residential mortgage-backed
5,252    174    15    (268 ) (190 ) 4,983
Commercial mortgage-backed
3,767    135    6    (153 ) (34 ) 3,721
Other asset-backed
2,172    22    —      (86 ) (2 ) 2,106

Total fixed maturity securities
55,063    2,421    34    (1,070 ) (227 ) 56,221
Equity securities
352    25    —      (3 ) —      374

Total available-for-sale securities
$ 55,415    $ 2,446    $ 34    $ (1,073 ) $ (227 ) $ 56,595

~~As of December 31, 2010, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:~~


(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost			Gross unrealized gains								Gross unrealized losses								Fair value
(Amounts in millions)																				Fair value					Gross unrealized gains								Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Amortized cost or cost				Not other-than- temporarily impaired				Other-than- temporarily impaired				Not other-than- temporarily impaired				Other-than- temporarily impaired				Fair value				Amortized cost or cost				Not other-than- temporarily impaired				Other-than- temporarily impaired				Not other-than- temporarily impaired				Other-than- temporarily impaired				Fair value
(Amounts in millions)																							Fair value
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3,568	Amortized cost or cost		$	145			$	—			$	(8	)		$	—			$	3,705			$	3,946			$	918			$	—			$	(1	)		$	—			$	4,863
Tax-exempt		1,124			19				—				(113	)			—				1,030				564				15				—				(76	)			—				503
Government—non-U.S.		2,257			118				—				(6	)			—				2,369				2,017				196				—				(2	)			—				2,211
U.S. corporate		23,282			1,123				10				(448	)			—				23,967				23,024				2,542				18				(325	)			(1	)			25,258
Corporate—non-U.S.		13,180			485				—				(167	)			—				13,498				13,156				819				—				(218	)			—				13,757
Residential mortgage-backed		4,821			116				18				(304	)			(196	)			4,455
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,936			132				6				(286	)			(45	)			3,743
Residential mortgage- backed																									5,695				446				9				(252	)			(203	)			5,695
Commercial mortgage- backed																									3,470				157				4				(179	)			(52	)			3,400
Other asset-backed		2,494			18				—				(94	)			(2	)			2,416				2,686				18				—				(95	)			(1	)			2,608

Total fixed maturity securities		54,662			2,156				34				(1,426	)			(243	)			55,183				54,558				5,111				31				(1,148	)			(257	)			58,295
Equity securities		323			13				—				(4	)			—				332				356				19				—				(14	)			—				361

Total available-for-sale securities	$	54,985		$	2,169			$	34			$	(1,430	)		$	(243	)		$	55,515			$	54,914			$	5,130			$	31			$	(1,162	)		$	(257	)		$	58,656

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair values of our investment securities, aggregated by investment type and length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of ~~June 30, 2011:~~March 31, 2012:


	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total							Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽¹⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽²⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽¹⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽²⁾			Number of securities
Description of Securities
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	1,002	$	(19	)		43	$	—	$	—			—	$	1,002	$	(19	)		43	$	247	$	(6	)		19	$	—	$	—			—	$	247	$	(6	)		19
Tax-exempt		114		(3	)		31		253		(91	)		88		367		(94	)		119		—		—			—		152		(51	)		31		152		(51	)		31
Government—non-U.S.		189		(3	)		58		11		(1	)		5		200		(4	)		63		131		(1	)		29		—		—			—		131		(1	)		29
U.S. corporate		2,933		(94	)		337		1,712		(213	)		150		4,645		(307	)		487		1,428		(36	)		170		1,274		(178	)		113		2,702		(214	)		283
Corporate—non-U.S.		1,896		(65	)		276		854		(75	)		78		2,750		(140	)		354		1,040		(35	)		132		691		(90	)		59		1,731		(125	)		191
Residential mortgage-backed		450		(19	)		92		884		(439	)		373		1,334		(458	)		465		261		(3	)		58		716		(397	)		352		977		(400	)		410
Commercial mortgage-backed		361		(17	)		51		1,034		(170	)		180		1,395		(187	)		231		277		(18	)		42		857		(185	)		159		1,134		(203	)		201
Other asset-backed		113		(5	)		20		343		(83	)		39		456		(88	)		59		257		(3	)		38		273		(87	)		30		530		(90	)		68

Subtotal, fixed maturity securities		7,058		(225	)		908		5,091		(1,072	)		913		12,149		(1,297	)		1,821		3,641		(102	)		488		3,963		(988	)		744		7,604		(1,090	)		1,232
Equity securities		83		(2	)		54		10		(1	)		10		93		(3	)		64		110		(6	)		52		18		(1	)		17		128		(7	)		69

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	7,141	$	(227	)		962	$	5,101	$	(1,073	)		923	$	12,242	$	(1,300	)		1,885	$	3,751	$	(108	)		540	$	3,981	$	(989	)		761	$	7,732	$	(1,097	)		1,301

% Below cost—fixed maturity securities:
<20% Below cost	$	6,969	$	(190	)		883	$	3,966	$	(354	)		544	$	10,935	$	(544	)		1,427	$	3,619	$	(87	)		465	$	2,767	$	(255	)		399	$	6,386	$	(342	)		864
20%-50% Below cost		89		(34	)		20		986		(432	)		249		1,075		(466	)		269		21		(9	)		12		1,084		(474	)		228		1,105		(483	)		240
>50% Below cost		—		(1	)		5		139		(286	)		120		139		(287	)		125		1		(6	)		11		112		(259	)		117		113		(265	)		128

Total fixed maturity securities		7,058		(225	)		908		5,091		(1,072	)		913		12,149		(1,297	)		1,821		3,641		(102	)		488		3,963		(988	)		744		7,604		(1,090	)		1,232

% Below cost—equity securities:
<20% Below cost		78		(1	)		53		10		(1	)		10		88		(2	)		63		93		(2	)		48		18		(1	)		17		111		(3	)		65
20%-50% Below cost		5		(1	)		1		—		—			—		5		(1	)		1		17		(4	)		4		—		—			—		17		(4	)		4
>50% Below cost		—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—			—

Total equity securities		83		(2	)		54		10		(1	)		10		93		(3	)		64		110		(6	)		52		18		(1	)		17		128		(7	)		69

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	7,141	$	(227	)		962	$	5,101	$	(1,073	)		923	$	12,242	$	(1,300	)		1,885	$	3,751	$	(108	)		540	$	3,981	$	(989	)		761	$	7,732	$	(1,097	)		1,301


Investment grade	$	6,837	$	(217	)		863	$	3,616	$	(505	)		527	$	10,453	$	(722	)		1,390	$	3,414	$	(84	)		416	$	2,726	$	(407	)		372	$	6,140	$	(491	)		788
Below investment grade⁽³⁾		304		(10	)		99		1,485		(568	)		396		1,789		(578	)		495		337		(24	)		124		1,255		(582	)		389		1,592		(606	)		513

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	7,141	$	(227	)		962	$	5,101	$	(1,073	)		923	$	12,242	$	(1,300	)		1,885	$	3,751	$	(108	)		540	$	3,981	$	(989	)		761	$	7,732	$	(1,097	)		1,301

⁽¹⁾	Amounts included ~~$222~~$202 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

⁽²⁾	Amounts included ~~$227~~$210 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

⁽³⁾	Amounts that have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more included ~~$208~~$195 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As indicated in the table above, the majority of the securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months were investment grade and less than 20% below cost. These unrealized losses were primarily attributable to credit spreads that have widened since acquisition for corporate securities across various industry sectors, including finance and insurance as well as ~~transportation.~~consumer–non-cyclical. For securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss for less than 12 months, the average fair value percentage below cost was approximately 3% as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

Fixed Maturity Securities In A Continuous Unrealized Loss Position For 12 Months Or More

Of the ~~$354~~$255 million of unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities in a continuous unrealized loss for 12 months or more that were less than 20% below cost, the weighted-average rating was “BBB” and approximately 75% of the unrealized losses were related to investment grade securities as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. These unrealized losses were attributable to the widening of credit spreads for these securities since acquisition, primarily associated with corporate securities in the finance and insurance sector as well as ~~mortgaged-back~~mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. The average fair value percentage below cost for these securities was approximately 8% as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. See below for additional discussion related to fixed maturity securities that have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more with a fair value that was more than 20% below cost.

The following tables present the concentration of gross unrealized losses and fair values of fixed maturity securities that were more than 20% below cost and in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more by asset class as of ~~June 30, 2011:~~March 31, 2012:


	Investment Grade																				Investment Grade
	20% to 50%										Greater than 50%										20% to 50%										Greater than 50%
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Fixed maturity securities:
Tax-exempt	$	184	$	(78	)		6	%		55	$	—	$	—			—	%		—	$	118	$	(46	)		4	%		13	$	—	$	—			—	%		—
Government—non-U.S.		2		(1	)		—			1		—		—			—			—
U.S. corporate		77		(30	)		2			4		14		(26	)		2			1		203		(63	)		6			10		—		—			—			—
Corporate—non-U.S.		66		(20	)		2			4		—		—			—			—		104		(40	)		3			13		—		—			—			—
Structured securities:
Residential mortgage-backed		56		(23	)		2			21		12		(27	)		2			14		35		(17	)		2			16		11		(25	)		2			12
Commercial mortgage-backed		80		(30	)		2			9		2		(3	)		—			5		43		(16	)		1			12		1		(1	)		—			1
Other asset-backed		4		(1	)		—			1		1		(1	)		—			1		18		(7	)		1			3		—		—			—			—

Total structured securities		140		(54	)		4			31		15		(31	)		2			20		96		(40	)		4			31		12		(26	)		2			13

Total	$	469	$	(183	)		14	%		95	$	29	$	(57	)		4	%		21	$	521	$	(189	)		17	%		67	$	12	$	(26	)		2	%		13

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Below Investment Grade																				Below Investment Grade
	20% to 50%										Greater than 50%										20% to 50%										Greater than 50%
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Fixed maturity securities:
Tax-exempt	$	—	$	—			—	%		—	$	—	$	—			—	%		—
U.S. corporate		14		(6	)		—			2		—		—			—			—	$	108	$	(39	)		4	%		12	$	—	$	—			—	%		—
Structured securities:
Residential mortgage-backed		342		(168	)		13			124		82		(184	)		14			81		256		(141	)		13			110		71		(183	)		17			87
Commercial mortgage-backed		61		(22	)		2			23		17		(33	)		3			16		129		(55	)		5			35		19		(34	)		3			14
Other asset-backed		100		(53	)		4			5		11		(12	)		1			2		70		(50	)		4			4		10		(16	)		1			3

Total structured securities		503		(243	)		19			152		110		(229	)		18			99		455		(246	)		22			149		100		(233	)		21			104

Total	$	517	$	(249	)		19	%		154	$	110	$	(229	)		18	%		99	$	563	$	(285	)		26	%		161	$	100	$	(233	)		21	%		104

For all securities in an unrealized loss position, we expect to recover the amortized cost based on our estimate of cash flows to be collected. We do not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell these securities prior to recovering our amortized cost. See below for further discussion of gross unrealized losses by asset class.

Tax-Exempt Securities

As indicated in the table above, ~~$78~~$46 million of gross unrealized losses were related to tax-exempt securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months and were more than 20% below cost. The unrealized losses for tax-exempt securities represent municipal bonds that were diversified by state as well as municipality or political subdivision within those states. Of these tax-exempt securities, the average unrealized loss was approximately $1$4 million which represented an average of ~~30%~~28% below cost. The unrealized losses primarily related to widening of credit spreads on these securities since acquisition as a result of higher risk premiums being attributed to these securities from uncertainty in many political subdivisions related to special revenues supporting these obligations as well as certain securities having longer duration that may be viewed as less desirable in the current market place. Additionally, the fair value of certain of these securities has been negatively impacted as a result of having certain bond insurers associated with the security. In our analysis of impairment for these securities, we expect to recover our amortized cost from the cash flows of the underlying securities before any guarantee support. However, the existence of these guarantees may negatively impact the value of the debt security in certain instances. We performed an analysis of these securities and the underlying activities that are expected to support the cash flows and determined we expect to recover our amortized cost.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Corporate Debt Securities

The following tables present the concentration of gross unrealized losses and fair values related to corporate debt fixed maturity securities that were more than 20% below cost and in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more by industry as of ~~June 30, 2011:~~March 31, 2012:


	Investment Grade																				Investment Grade
	20% to 50%										Greater than 50%										20% to 50%										Greater than 50%
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Industry:
Finance and insurance	$	139	$	(49	)		4	%		7	$	—	$	—			—	%		—	$	262	$	(90	)		8	%		20	$	—	$	—		—	%		—
Transportation		—		—			—			—		14		(26	)		2			1
Other		4		(1	)		—			1		—		—			—			—
Consumer—non-cyclical																						31		(9	)		1			1		—		—		—			—
Capital goods																						10		(3	)		—			1		—		—		—			—
Technology and communications																						4		(1	)		—			1		—		—		—			—

Total	$	143	$	(50	)		4	%		8	$	14	$	(26	)		2	%		1	$	307	$	(103	)		9	%		23	$	—	$	—		—	%		—


	Below Investment Grade																			Below Investment Grade
	20% to 50%										Greater than 50%									20% to 50%										Greater than 50%
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		% of total gross unrealized losses			Number of securities
Industry:
Finance and insurance	$	14	$	(6	)		—	%		2	$	—	$	—		—	%		—	$	62	$	(24	)		2	%		3	$	—	$	—		—	%		—
Consumer – cyclical		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—
Consumer—non-cyclical																					12		(6	)		1			1		—		—		—			—
Consumer-cyclical																					2		(1	)		—			6		—		—		—			—
Capital goods																					29		(7	)		1			1		—		—		—			—
Transportation		—		—			—			—		—		—		—			—		3		(1	)		—			1		—		—		—			—

Total	$	14	$	(6	)		—	%		2	$	—	$	—		—	%		—	$	108	$	(39	)		4	%		12	$	—	$	—		—	%		—

Of the total unrealized losses of ~~$82~~$142 million for corporate fixed maturity securities presented in the preceding tables, ~~$55~~$114 million, or ~~67%~~80%, of the unrealized losses related to issuers in the finance and insurance sector that were 26% below cost on average. Given the current market conditions, including current financial industry events and uncertainty around global economic conditions, the fair value of these debt securities has declined due to credit spreads that have widened since acquisition. In our examination of these securities, we considered all available evidence, including the issuers’ financial condition and current industry events to develop our conclusion on the amount and timing of the cash flows expected to be collected. Based on this evaluation, we determined that the unrealized losses on these debt securities represented temporary impairments as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. Of the ~~$55~~$114 million of unrealized losses related to the finance and insurance industry, ~~$28~~$92 million related to financial hybrid securities on which a debt impairment model was employed. Most of our hybrid securities retained a credit rating of investment grade. The fair value of these hybrid securities has been impacted by credit spreads that have widened since acquisition and reflect uncertainty surrounding the extent and duration of government involvement, potential capital restructuring of these institutions, and continued but diminishing risk that income payments may be deferred. We continue to receive our contractual payments and expect to fully recover our amortized cost.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As presented in the table above, we also had one security related to the transportation industry that had a total unrealized loss of $26 million that was 65% below cost as of June 30, 2011. The issuer of this security has diverse holdings in long-term franchises on toll roads, bridges and tunnels in economically important regions. Our security holding represented a senior interest that benefits from structural enhancements that protect our rights to the issuer’s cash flows. In our evaluation of the issuer, we believed there were sufficient assets and cash flows for the issuer to continue to make their contractual payments and that resulted in our conclusion that we will recover the amortized cost despite the fair value of this security being greater than 50% below cost.

We expect that our investments in corporate securities will continue to perform in accordance with our expectations about the amount and timing of estimated cash flows. Although we do not anticipate such events, it is at least reasonably possible that issuers of our investments in corporate securities will perform worse than current expectations. Such events may lead us to recognize write-downs within our portfolio of corporate securities in the future.

Structured Securities

Of the ~~$557~~$545 million of unrealized losses related to structured securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more and were more than 20% below cost, ~~$192~~$174 million related to ~~other-than-temporarily-impaired~~other-than-temporarily impaired securities where the unrealized losses represented the ~~non-credit~~ portion of the ~~impairment.~~other-than-temporary impairment recognized in OCI. The extent and duration of the unrealized loss position on our structured securities is due to the ongoing concern and uncertainty about the residential and commercial real estate market and unemployment, resulting in credit spreads that have widened since acquisition. Additionally, the fair value of certain structured securities has been significantly impacted from high risk premiums being incorporated into the valuation as a result of the amount of potential losses that may be absorbed by the security in the event of additional deterioration in the U.S. housing market.

While we considered the length of time each security had been in an unrealized loss position, the extent of the unrealized loss position and any significant declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date in our evaluation of impairment for each of these individual securities, the primary factor in our evaluation of impairment is the expected performance for each of these securities. Our evaluation of expected performance is based on the historical performance of the associated securitization trust as well as the historical performance of the underlying collateral. Our examination of the historical performance of the securitization trust included consideration of the following factors for each class of securities issued by the trust: i) the payment history, including failure to make scheduled payments; ii) current payment status; iii) current and historical outstanding balances; iv) current levels of subordination and losses incurred ~~to-date;~~to date; and v) characteristics of the underlying collateral. Our examination of the historical performance of the underlying collateral included: i) historical default rates, delinquency rates, voluntary and involuntary prepayments and severity of losses, including recent trends in this information; ii) current payment status; iii) loan to collateral value ratios, as applicable; iv) vintage; and v) other underlying characteristics such as current financial condition.

We used our assessment of the historical performance of both the securitization trust and the underlying collateral for each security, along with third-party sources, when available, to develop our best estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. These estimates reflect projections for future delinquencies, prepayments, defaults and losses for the assets that collateralize the securitization trust and are used to determine the expected cash flows for our security, based on the payment structure of the trust. Our projection of expected cash flows is primarily based on the expected performance of the underlying assets that collateralize the securitization trust and is not directly impacted by the rating of our security. While we consider the rating of the security as an indicator of the financial condition of the issuer, this factor does not have a significant impact on our expected

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

cash flows for each security. In limited circumstances, our expected cash flows include expected payments from reliable financial guarantors where we believe the financial guarantor will have sufficient assets to pay claims under the financial guarantee when the cash flows from the securitization trust are not sufficient to make scheduled payments. We then discount the expected cash flows using the effective yield of each security to determine the present value of expected cash flows.

Based on this evaluation, the present value of expected cash flows was greater than or equal to the amortized cost for each security. Accordingly, we determined that the unrealized losses on each of our structured securities represented temporary impairments as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Despite the considerable analysis and rigor employed on our structured securities, it is at least reasonably possible that the underlying collateral of these investments will perform worse than current market expectations. Such events may lead to adverse changes in cash flows on our holdings of structured securities and future write-downs within our portfolio of structured securities.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total							Less than 12 months							12 months or more							Total
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽¹⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽²⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽¹⁾			Number of securities		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses⁽²⁾			Number of securities
Description of Securities
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	545	$	(8	)		36	$	—	$	—			—	$	545	$	(8	)		36	$	160	$	(1	)		2	$	—	$	—			—	$	160	$	(1	)		2
Tax-exempt		285		(12	)		101		244		(101	)		90		529		(113	)		191		—		—			—		230		(76	)		72		230		(76	)		72
Government—non-U.S.		431		(5	)		69		21		(1	)		7		452		(6	)		76		90		(1	)		25		8		(1	)		8		98		(2	)		33
U.S. corporate		3,615		(125	)		443		2,338		(323	)		191		5,953		(448	)		634		1,721		(68	)		175		1,416		(258	)		136		3,137		(326	)		311
Corporate—non-U.S.		2,466		(53	)		296		1,141		(114	)		102		3,607		(167	)		398		1,475		(86	)		188		705		(132	)		75		2,180		(218	)		263
Residential mortgage-backed		461		(23	)		92		1,031		(477	)		416		1,492		(500	)		508		276		(5	)		68		727		(450	)		359		1,003		(455	)		427
Commercial mortgage-backed		177		(8	)		26		1,167		(323	)		225		1,344		(331	)		251		282		(36	)		49		831		(195	)		159		1,113		(231	)		208
Other asset-backed		401		(2	)		37		512		(94	)		53		913		(96	)		90		623		(3	)		83		309		(93	)		35		932		(96	)		118

Subtotal, fixed maturity securities		8,381		(236	)		1,100		6,454		(1,433	)		1,084		14,835		(1,669	)		2,184		4,627		(200	)		590		4,226		(1,205	)		844		8,853		(1,405	)		1,434
Equity securities		77		(3	)		48		5		(1	)		4		82		(4	)		52		92		(11	)		39		25		(3	)		13		117		(14	)		52

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	8,458	$	(239	)		1,148	$	6,459	$	(1,434	)		1,088	$	14,917	$	(1,673	)		2,236	$	4,719	$	(211	)		629	$	4,251	$	(1,208	)		857	$	8,970	$	(1,419	)		1,486

% Below cost—fixed maturity securities:
<20% Below cost	$	8,359	$	(226	)		1,076	$	4,852	$	(418	)		588	$	13,211	$	(644	)		1,664	$	4,545	$	(156	)		548	$	2,758	$	(252	)		435	$	7,303	$	(408	)		983
20%-50% Below cost		22		(8	)		18		1,428		(652	)		328		1,450		(660	)		346		78		(30	)		27		1,335		(653	)		283		1,413		(683	)		310
>50% Below cost		—		(2	)		6		174		(363	)		168		174		(365	)		174		4		(14	)		15		133		(300	)		126		137		(314	)		141

Total fixed maturity securities		8,381		(236	)		1,100		6,454		(1,433	)		1,084		14,835		(1,669	)		2,184		4,627		(200	)		590		4,226		(1,205	)		844		8,853		(1,405	)		1,434

% Below cost—equity securities:
<20% Below cost		72		(2	)		47		5		(1	)		4		77		(3	)		51		80		(6	)		36		21		(1	)		12		101		(7	)		48
20%-50% Below cost		5		(1	)		1		—		—			—		5		(1	)		1		12		(5	)		3		4		(2	)		1		16		(7	)		4

Total equity securities		77		(3	)		48		5		(1	)		4		82		(4	)		52		92		(11	)		39		25		(3	)		13		117		(14	)		52

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	8,458	$	(239	)		1,148	$	6,459	$	(1,434	)		1,088	$	14,917	$	(1,673	)		2,236	$	4,719	$	(211	)		629	$	4,251	$	(1,208	)		857	$	8,970	$	(1,419	)		1,486


Investment grade	$	8,249	$	(231	)		1,060	$	4,850	$	(764	)		683	$	13,099	$	(995	)		1,743	$	4,292	$	(165	)		502	$	3,066	$	(577	)		479	$	7,358	$	(742	)		981
Below investment grade⁽³⁾		209		(8	)		88		1,609		(670	)		405		1,818		(678	)		493		427		(46	)		127		1,185		(631	)		378		1,612		(677	)		505

Total for securities in an unrealized loss position	$	8,458	$	(239	)		1,148	$	6,459	$	(1,434	)		1,088	$	14,917	$	(1,673	)		2,236	$	4,719	$	(211	)		629	$	4,251	$	(1,208	)		857	$	8,970	$	(1,419	)		1,486

⁽¹⁾	Amounts included ~~$240~~$248 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

⁽²⁾	Amounts included ~~$243~~$257 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

⁽³⁾	Amounts that have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more included ~~$213~~$235 million of unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The scheduled maturity distribution of fixed maturity securities as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 is set forth below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers of securities may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Fair value		Amortized cost or cost		Fair value
Due one year or less	$	2,831	$	2,857	$	2,925	$	2,958
Due after one year through five years		11,766		12,103		10,803		11,183
Due after five years through ten years		9,570		10,031		10,305		11,066
Due after ten years		19,705		20,420		19,223		21,648

Subtotal		43,872		45,411		43,256		46,855
Residential mortgage-backed		5,252		4,983		5,807		5,852
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,767		3,721		3,407		3,346
Other asset-backed		2,172		2,106		2,544		2,479

Total	$	55,063	$	56,221	$	55,014	$	58,532

As of ~~June 30, 2011, $4,505~~March 31, 2012, $4,416 million of our investments (excluding mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities) were subject to certain call provisions.

As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, securities issued by utilities and energy, finance and insurance, ~~utilities and energy,~~ and consumer—non-cyclical industry groups represented approximately ~~22%~~23%, ~~22%~~21% and ~~11%~~12% of our domestic and foreign corporate fixed maturity securities portfolio, respectively. No other industry group comprised more than 10% of our investment portfolio. This portfolio is widely diversified among various geographic regions in the United States and internationally, and is not dependent on the economic stability of one particular region.

As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we did not hold any fixed maturity securities in any single issuer, other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government, which exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity.

(e) Commercial Mortgage Loans

Our mortgage loans are collateralized by commercial properties, including multi-family residential buildings. The carrying value of commercial mortgage loans is stated at original cost net of prepayments, amortization and allowance for loan losses.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

We diversify our commercial mortgage loans by both property type and geographic region. The following tables set forth the distribution across property type and geographic region for commercial mortgage loans as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010						March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total
Property type:
Retail	$	1,912			30	%	$	1,974			29	%	$	1,907			31	%	$	1,898			31	%
Industrial														1,688			28			1,707			28
Office		1,757			27			1,850			27			1,553			26			1,590			26
Industrial		1,753			27			1,788			26
Apartments		718			11			725			11			626			10			641			10
Mixed use/other		345			5			435			7			302			5			304			5

Subtotal		6,485			100	%		6,772			100	%		6,076			100	%		6,140			100	%

Unamortized balance of loan origination fees and costs		4						5						3						3
Allowance for losses		(57	)					(59	)					(49	)					(51	)

Total	$	6,432					$	6,718					$	6,030					$	6,092


	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total
Geographic region:
South Atlantic	$	1,629			27	%	$	1,631			27	%
Pacific		1,504			25			1,539			25
Middle Atlantic		750			12			734			12
East North Central		544			9			557			9
Mountain		482			8			497			8
New England		385			6			388			6
West North Central		332			5			337			5
West South Central		293			5			298			5
East South Central		157			3			159			3

Subtotal		6,076			100	%		6,140			100	%

Unamortized balance of loan origination fees and costs		3						3
Allowance for losses		(49	)					(51	)

Total	$	6,030					$	6,092

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

   June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)
   Carrying
value % of
total Carrying
value % of
total
Geographic region:

South Atlantic
   $ 1,624    25 % $ 1,583    23 %
Pacific
   1,615    25    1,769    26
Middle Atlantic
   865    13    937    14
East North Central
   577    9    612    9
Mountain
   516    8    540    8
New England
   422    7    482    7
West North Central
   349    5    369    6
West South Central
   348    5    297    4
East South Central
   169    3    183    3

Subtotal
   6,485    100 % 6,772    100 %

Unamortized balance of loan origination fees and costs
   4    5
Allowance for losses
   (57 ) (59 )

Total
   $ 6,432    $ 6,718

The following tables set forth the aging of past due commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011																		March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	31 – 60 days past due			61 – 90 days past due			Greater than 90 days past due			Total past due			Current			Total			31 - 60 days past due			61 - 90 days past due			Greater than 90 days past due			Total past due			Current			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	9		$	—		$	5		$	14		$	1,898		$	1,912		$	3		$	—		$	—		$	3		$	1,904		$	1,907
Industrial																				—			—			1			1			1,687			1,688
Office		4			—			18			22			1,735			1,757			6			—			6			12			1,541			1,553
Industrial		2			—			10			12			1,741			1,753
Apartments		—			—			—			—			718			718			—			3			—			3			623			626
Mixed use/other		—			—			—			—			345			345			1			—			—			1			301			302

Total recorded investment	$	15		$	—		$	33		$	48		$	6,437		$	6,485		$	10		$	3		$	7		$	20		$	6,056		$	6,076

% of total commercial mortgage loans		—	%		—	%		1	%		1	%		99	%		100	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		100	%		100	%

   December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)
   31 – 60 days
past due 61 – 90 days
past due Greater than
90 days past
due Total
past due Current Total
Property type:

Retail
   $ —      $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 1,974    $ 1,974
Office
   —      —      12    12    1,838    1,850
Industrial
   —      6    27    33    1,755    1,788
Apartments
   —      —      —      —      725    725
Mixed use/other
   —      —      —      —      435    435

Total recorded investment
   $ —      $ 6    $ 39    $ 45    $ 6,727    $ 6,772

% of total commercial mortgage loans
   —   % —   % 1 % 1 % 99 % 100 %

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	31 - 60 days past due			61 - 90 days past due			Greater than 90 days past due			Total past due			Current			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	107		$	—		$	—		$	107		$	1,791		$	1,898
Industrial		3			—			—			3			1,704			1,707
Office		4			3			15			22			1,568			1,590
Apartments		—			—			—			—			641			641
Mixed use/other		1			—			—			1			303			304

Total recorded investment	$	115		$	3		$	15		$	133		$	6,007		$	6,140

% of total commercial mortgage loans		2	%		—	%		—	%		2	%		98	%		100	%

As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had no commercial mortgage loans that were past due for more than 90 days and still accruing interest.

~~During~~As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011, ~~and 2010,~~ we modified or extended 117 and ~~13, respectively,~~39 commercial mortgage loans, respectively, with a total carrying value of ~~$36~~$48 million and ~~$98~~$252 million, respectively. All of these modifications or extensions were based on current market interest rates, did not result in any forgiveness in the outstanding principal amount owed by the borrower and were not considered troubled debt restructurings. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, we modified or extended one commercial mortgage loan with a total carrying value of $3 million that was considered a troubled debt restructuring. As part of this troubled debt restructuring, we forgave default penalties and fees. This troubled debt restructuring did not result in any forgiveness in the outstanding principal amount owed by the borrower or a change to the original contractual interest rate.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth the commercial mortgage loans on nonaccrual status by property type as of the dates indicated:


					March 31,		December 31,
(Amounts in millions)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		2012		2011
Property type:
Retail	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	—
Industrial						1		—
Office		18		12		6		15
Industrial		10		27
Apartments		—		—		—		—
Mixed use/other		—		—		—		—

Total recorded investment	$	33	$	39	$	7	$	15

The following table sets forth the allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in commercial mortgage loans as of or for the periods indicated:

(Amounts in millions)
   Three months ended
June 30, 2011 Six months ended
June 30, 2011
Allowance for credit losses:

Beginning balance
   $ 58    $ 59
Charge-offs
   (4 ) (5 )
Recoveries
   —      —
Provision
   3    3


Ending balance
   $ 57    $ 57


Ending allowance for individually impaired loans
   $ —      $ —


Ending allowance for loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment
   $ 57    $ 57


Recorded investment:

Ending balance
   $ 6,485    $ 6,485


Ending balance of individually impaired loans
   $ 13    $ 13


Ending balance of loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment
   $ 6,472    $ 6,472

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~The following table presents the activity in the allowance for losses for the periods indicated:~~

(Amounts in millions)
Three months ended
June 30, 2010    Six months ended
June 30, 2010
Beginning balance
$ 52       $ 48
Provision⁽¹⁾
18       22
Release
—         —



Ending balance
$ 70       $ 70

⁽¹⁾	~~Included $13 million related to held-for-sale commercial mortgage loans.~~


	Three months ended
	March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	51		$	59
Charge-offs		(1	)		(1	)
Recoveries		—			—
Provision		(1	)		—

Ending balance	$	49		$	58

Ending allowance for individually impaired loans	$	—		$	—

Ending allowance for loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment	$	49		$	58

Recorded investment:
Ending balance	$	6,076		$	6,654

Ending balance of individually impaired loans	$	2		$	14

Ending balance of loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment	$	6,074		$	6,640

The following tables set forth our individually impaired commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011												March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Charge- offs		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Charge- offs		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
Property type:
Retail	$	3	$	4	$	1	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Industrial														—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Office		10		13		3		—	$	10		—		2		3		1		—	$	2		—
Industrial		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Apartments		—		—		—		—	$	—		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Mixed use/other		—		—		—		—	$	—		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—

Total	$	13	$	17	$	4	$	—	$	6	$	—	$	2	$	3	$	1	$	—	$	2	$	—

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2010												December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Charge- offs		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Charge- offs		Related allowance		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
Property type:
Retail	$	5	$	8	$	3	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Industrial														—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Office		6		8		2		—	$	2		—		10		13		3		—	$	10		—
Industrial		19		24		5		—	$	3		—
Apartments		—		—		—		—	$	—		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—
Mixed use/other		—		—		—		—	$	—		—		—		—		—		—	$	—		—

Total	$	30	$	40	$	10	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	10	$	13	$	3	$	—	$	10	$	—

In evaluating the credit quality of commercial mortgage loans, we assess the performance of the underlying loans using both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Certain risks associated with commercial ~~mortgages~~mortgage loans can be evaluated by reviewing both the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratio to understand both the probability of the borrower not being able to make the necessary loan payments as well as the ability to sell the underlying property for an amount that would enable us to recover our unpaid principal balance in the event of default by the borrower. The average loan-to-value ratio is based on our most recent estimate of the fair value for the underlying property which is evaluated at least annually and updated more frequently if necessary to better indicate risk associated with the loan. A lower loan-to-value indicates that our loan value is more likely to be recovered in the event of default by the borrower if the property was sold. The debt service coverage ratio is

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

based on “normalized” annual net operating income of the property compared to the payments required under the terms of the loan. Normalization allows for the removal of annual one-time events such as capital expenditures, prepaid or late real estate tax payments or non-recurring third-party fees (such as legal, consulting or contract fees). This ratio is evaluated at least annually and updated more frequently if necessary to better indicate risk associated with the loan. A higher debt service coverage ratio indicates the borrower is less likely to default on the loan. The debt service coverage ratio should not be used without considering other factors associated with the borrower, such as the borrower’s liquidity or access to other resources that may result in our expectation that the borrower will continue to make the future scheduled payments.

The following tables set forth the loan-to-value of commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011																		March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	0% – 50%			51% – 60%			61% – 75%			76% – 100%			Greater than 100% ⁽¹⁾			Total			0% - 50%			51% - 60%			61% - 75%			76% - 100%			Greater than 100% ⁽¹⁾			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	458		$	247		$	847		$	322		$	38		$	1,912		$	465		$	279		$	878		$	246		$	39		$	1,907
Industrial																				453			328			637			251			19			1,688
Office		321			294			605			365			172			1,757			286			286			604			278			99			1,553
Industrial		498			329			613			283			30			1,753
Apartments		147			191			304			61			15			718			156			108			316			31			15			626
Mixed use/other		83			40			72			140			10			345			68			52			94			16			72			302

Total recorded investment	$	1,507		$	1,101		$	2,441		$	1,171		$	265		$	6,485
Total																			$	1,428		$	1,053		$	2,529		$	822		$	244		$	6,076

% of total		23	%		17	%		38	%		18	%		4	%		100	%		24	%		17	%		41	%		14	%		4	%		100	%

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio		2.28			1.86			2.16			1.80			1.56			2.05			2.19			1.92			2.20			1.16			2.17			2.01

⁽¹⁾	Included ~~$13~~$2 million of impaired loans and ~~$252 million of loans in good standing, with a total weighted-average loan-to-value of 119%, where borrowers continued to make timely payments and have no history of delinquencies or distress.~~

   December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)
   0% – 50% 51% – 60% 61% – 75% 76% – 100% Greater
than 100% ⁽¹⁾ Total
Property type:

Retail
   $ 477    $ 287    $ 805    $ 363    $ 42    $ 1,974
Office
   320    327    612    446    145    1,850
Industrial
   431    361    625    284    87    1,788
Apartments
   99    172    321    133    —      725
Mixed use/other
   123    10    63    221    18    435

Total recorded investment
   $ 1,450    $ 1,157    $ 2,426    $ 1,447    $ 292    $ 6,772

% of total
   22 % 17 % 36 % 21 % 4 % 100 %

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio
   2.24    1.99    1.79    2.42    0.75    2.01

⁽¹⁾	~~Included $25 million of impaired loans and $267~~$242 million of loans in good standing, with a total weighted-average loan-to-value of 117%, where borrowers continued to make timely payments and have no history of delinquencies or distress.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	0% - 50%			51% - 60%			61% - 75%			76% - 100%			Greater than 100% ⁽¹⁾			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	453		$	247		$	900		$	268		$	30		$	1,898
Industrial		445			332			642			261			27			1,707
Office		364			281			546			283			116			1,590
Apartments		164			110			321			31			15			641
Mixed use/other		81			47			89			15			72			304

Total	$	1,507		$	1,017		$	2,498		$	858		$	260		$	6,140

% of total		25	%		17	%		40	%		14	%		4	%		100	%

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio		2.28			1.89			2.16			1.19			2.26			2.01

⁽¹⁾	Included $260 million of loans in good standing, with a total weighted-average loan-to-value of 117%, where borrowers continued to make timely payments and have no history of delinquencies or distress.

The following tables set forth the debt service coverage ratio for fixed rate commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011																		March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Less than 1.00			1.00 – 1.25			1.26 – 1.50			1.51 – 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total			Less than 1.00			1.00 -1.25			1.26 -1.50			1.51 -2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	92		$	357		$	412		$	587		$	352		$	1,800		$	106		$	306		$	435		$	574		$	381		$	1,802
Industrial																				201			227			278			653			322			1,681
Office		194			135			268			432			553			1,582			163			171			310			400			425			1,469
Industrial		242			226			316			596			355			1,735
Apartments		12			91			79			301			168			651			15			81			59			304			167			626
Mixed use/other		56			17			11			71			91			246			33			27			37			57			64			218

Total recorded investment	$	596		$	826		$	1,086		$	1,987		$	1,519		$	6,014
Total																			$	518		$	812		$	1,119		$	1,988		$	1,359		$	5,796

% of total		10	%		14	%		18	%		33	%		25	%		100	%		9	%		14	%		19	%		35	%		23	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value		84	%		72	%		66	%		60	%		51	%		63	%		86	%		72	%		66	%		59	%		49	%		62	%

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2010																		December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Less than 1.00			1.00 – 1.25			1.26 – 1.50			1.51 – 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total			Less than 1.00			1.00 -1.25			1.26 -1.50			1.51 -2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	125		$	317		$	490		$	512		$	415		$	1,859		$	91		$	322		$	445		$	595		$	340		$	1,793
Industrial																				197			238			278			652			334			1,699
Office		176			186			238			524			547			1,671			188			130			341			395			452			1,506
Industrial		260			166			292			698			346			1,762
Apartments		7			62			160			290			135			654			15			80			76			295			174			640
Mixed use/other		49			12			17			78			94			250			22			23			53			61			59			218

Total	$	617		$	743		$	1,197		$	2,102		$	1,537		$	6,196		$	513		$	793		$	1,193		$	1,998		$	1,359		$	5,856

% of total recorded investment		10	%		12	%		19	%		34	%		25	%		100	%
% of total																				9	%		14	%		20	%		34	%		23	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value		90	%		71	%		68	%		62	%		50	%		64	%		86	%		72	%		68	%		59	%		50	%		63	%

The following tables set forth the debt service coverage ratio for floating rate commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011																		March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Less than 1.00			1.00 – 1.25			1.26 – 1.50			1.51 – 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total			Less than 1.00			1.00 - 1.25			1.26 - 1.50			1.51 - 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	—		$	—		$	1		$	—		$	111		$	112		$	—		$	—		$	1		$	—		$	104		$	105
Industrial																				—			—			—			4			3			7
Office		—			—			8			—			167			175			—			—			8			—			76			84
Industrial		1			—			—			6			11			18
Apartments		—			—			—			29			38			67			—			—			—			—			—			—
Mixed use/other		—			4			—			—			95			99			—			—			—			—			84			84

Total recorded investment	$	1		$	4		$	9		$	35		$	422		$	471
Total																			$	—		$	—		$	9		$	4		$	267		$	280

% of total		—	%		1	%		2	%		7	%		90	%		100	%		—	%		—	%		3	%		2	%		95	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value		47	%		77	%		26	%		77	%		79	%		77	%		—	%		—	%		54	%		43	%		75	%		74	%


																			December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)																			Less than 1.00			1.00 - 1.25			1.26 - 1.50			1.51 -2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail																			$	—		$	—		$	1		$	—		$	104		$	105
Industrial																				—			—			—			5			3			8
Office																				—			—			8			—			76			84
Apartments																				—			—			—			—			1			1
Mixed use/other																				—			—			—			—			86			86

Total																			$	—		$	—		$	9		$	5		$	270		$	284

% of total																				—	%		—	%		3	%		2	%		95	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value																				—	%		—	%		54	%		44	%		74	%		72	%

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

   December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)
   Less than 1.00 1.00 – 1.25 1.26 – 1.50 1.51 – 2.00 Greater than
2.00 Total
Property type:

Retail
   $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 2    $ 113    $ 115
Office
   —      —      —      57    122    179
Industrial
   1    5    —      1    19    26
Apartments
   —      4    —      21    46    71
Mixed use/other
   —      —      —      —      185    185


Total recorded investment
   $ 1    $ 9    $ —      $ 81    $ 485    $ 576


% of total
   —   % 2 % —   % 14 % 84 % 100 %


Weighted-average loan-to-value
   30 % 62 % —   % 83 % 77 % 78 %

(f) Restricted Commercial Mortgage Loans Related To Securitization Entities

The following tables set forth additional information regarding our restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010						March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total
Property type:
Retail	$	175			38	%	$	182			36	%	$	155			39	%	$	161			38	%
Industrial		113			24			124			24			96			24			99			24
Office		101			22			117			23			76			19			86			21
Apartments		62			14			64			13			60			16			60			15
Mixed use/other		8			2			22			4			7			2			7			2

Subtotal		459			100	%		509			100	%		394			100	%		413			100	%

Allowance for losses		(2	)					(2	)					(2	)					(2	)

Total	$	457					$	507					$	392					$	411


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010						March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total			Carrying value			% of total
Geographic region:
South Atlantic	$	160			35	%	$	189			37	%	$	140			36	%	$	146			35	%
Pacific		77			17			90			18			71			18			74			18
Middle Atlantic		71			15			70			14			64			16			65			16
East North Central		48			10			51			10			39			10			42			10
West North Central														27			7			28			7
Mountain		31			7			32			6			24			6			28			7
East South Central		30			7			32			6			16			4			17			4
West North Central		29			6			31			6
West South Central		12			3			13			3			12			3			12			3
New England		1			—			1			—			1			—			1			—

Subtotal		459			100	%		509			100	%		394			100	%		413			100	%

Allowance for losses		(2	)					(2	)					(2	)					(2	)

Total	$	457					$	507					$	392					$	411

Of our restricted commercial mortgage loans as of March 31, 2012, $389 million were current, $3 million were 31 to 60 days past due and $2 million were 61 to 90 days past due. As of March 31, 2012, we did not have any restricted commercial mortgage loans that were past due for more than 90 days and still accruing interest. Of our restricted commercial mortgage loans as of December 31, 2011, $408 million were current, $2 million were 61 to 90 days past due and $3 million were past due for more than 90 days and still accruing interest.

As of March 31, 2012, the total recorded investment of restricted commercial mortgage loans of $394 million related to loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment. As of December 31, 2011, loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment were $412 million of the total recorded investment of restricted commercial mortgage loans of $413 million. There was no provision for credit losses recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011 related to restricted commercial mortgage loans.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Of our restricted commercial mortgage loans as of June 30, 2011, $457 million were current, $1 million were 61 to 90 days past due and $1 million were past due for more than 90 days and still accruing interest. As of December 31, 2010, all restricted commercial mortgage loans were current and there were no restricted commercial mortgage loans on nonaccrual status.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment were $458 million and $509 million, respectively, of the total recorded investment of restricted commercial mortgage loans of $459 million and $509 million, respectively. There was no provision for credit losses recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010 related to restricted commercial mortgage loans. There was no provision for credit losses recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to restricted commercial mortgage loans. A provision for credit losses of $2 million was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to restricted commercial mortgage loans, which reflected our ending allowance for credit losses balance and was required upon consolidation of securitization entities as of January 1, 2010.

In evaluating the credit quality of restricted commercial mortgage loans, we assess the performance of the underlying loans using both quantitative and qualitative criteria. The risks associated with restricted commercial mortgage loans can typically be evaluated by reviewing both the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratio to understand both the probability of the borrower not being able to make the necessary loan payments as well as the ability to sell the underlying property for an amount that would enable us to recover our unpaid principal balance in the event of default by the borrower. The average loan-to-value ratio is based on our most recent estimate of the fair value for the underlying property which is evaluated at least annually and updated more frequently if necessary to better indicate risk associated with the loan. A lower loan-to-value indicates that our loan value is more likely to be recovered in the event of default by the borrower if the property was sold. The debt service coverage ratio is based on “normalized” annual net operating income of the property compared to the payments required under the terms of the loan. Normalization allows for the removal of annual one-time events such as capital expenditures, prepaid or late real estate tax payments or non-recurring third-party fees (such as legal, consulting or contract fees). This ratio is evaluated at least annually and updated more frequently if necessary to better indicate risk associated with the loan. A higher debt service coverage ratio indicates the borrower is less likely to default on the loan. The debt service coverage ratio should not be used without considering other factors associated with the borrower, such as the borrower’s liquidity or access to other resources that may result in our expectation that the borrower will continue to make the future scheduled payments.

The following tables set forth the loan-to-value of restricted commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011																		March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	0% – 50%			51% – 60%			61% – 75%			76% – 100%			Greater than 100%			Total			0% - 50%			51% - 60%			61% - 75%			76% - 100%			Greater than 100%			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	147		$	25		$	—		$	—		$	3		$	175		$	144		$	5		$	2		$	—		$	4		$	155
Industrial		97			8			6			—			2			113			86			2			2			4			2			96
Office		87			7			5			1			1			101			58			9			4			3			2			76
Apartments		34			9			—			19			—			62			34			3			4			19			—			60
Mixed use/other		8			—			—			—			—			8			7			—			—			—			—			7

Total recorded investment	$	373		$	49		$	11		$	20		$	6		$	459
Total recorded investments																			$	329		$	19		$	12		$	26		$	8		$	394

% of total		82	%		11	%		2	%		4	%		1	%		100	%		83	%		5	%		3	%		7	%		2	%		100	%

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio		1.74			1.46			1.26			0.93			0.47			1.65			1.77			1.33			1.77			1.01			0.65			1.67

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2010																		December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	0% – 50%			51% – 60%			61% – 75%			76% – 100%			Greater than 100%			Total			0% - 50%			51% - 60%			61% - 75%			76% - 100%			Greater than 100%			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	141		$	34		$	1		$	3		$	3		$	182		$	147		$	9		$	2		$	—		$	3		$	161
Industrial		108			8			4			2			2			124			87			5			—			5			2			99
Office		90			19			5			3			—			117			63			9			6			6			2			86
Apartments		35			9			—			20			—			64			34			3			—			23			—			60
Mixed use/other		17			5			—			—			—			22			7			—			—			—			—			7

Total recorded investment	$	391		$	75		$	10		$	28		$	5		$	509
Total recorded investments																			$	338		$	26		$	8		$	34		$	7		$	413

% of total		77	%		15	%		2	%		5	%		1	%		100	%		82	%		6	%		2	%		8	%		2	%		100	%

Weighted-average debt service coverage ratio		1.82			1.35			1.05			1.18			0.52			1.69			1.78			1.16			2.07			0.88			0.49			1.65

The following tables set forth the debt service coverage ratio for fixed rate restricted commercial mortgage loans by property type as of the dates indicated:

   June 30, 2011
(Amounts in millions)
   Less than 1.00 1.00 – 1.25 1.26 – 1.50 1.51 – 2.00 Greater
than 2.00 Total
Property type:

Retail
   $ 7    $ 48    $ 66    $ 21    $ 33    $ 175
Industrial
   20    24    27    11    31    113
Office
   12    12    39    25    13    101
Apartments
   12    10    20    15    5    62
Mixed use/other
   —      —      3    —      5    8

Total recorded investment
   $ 51    $ 94    $ 155    $ 72    $ 87    $ 459

% of total
   11 % 21 % 34 % 15 % 19 % 100 %

Weighted-average loan-to-value
   63 % 39 % 37 % 43 % 31 % 40 %


	December 31, 2010																		March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Less than 1.00			1.00 – 1.25			1.26 – 1.50			1.51 – 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total			Less than 1.00			1.00 - 1.25			1.26 - 1.50			1.51 - 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail	$	14		$	6		$	52		$	77		$	33		$	182		$	4		$	19		$	45		$	36		$	51		$	155
Industrial		11			9			25			50			29			124			18			4			17			26			31			96
Office		14			14			23			45			21			117			9			25			15			17			10			76
Apartments		—			21			10			26			7			64			—			20			10			25			5			60
Mixed use/other		—			—			7			11			4			22			—			—			—			2			5			7

Total recorded investment	$	39		$	50		$	117		$	209		$	94		$	509
Total recorded investments																			$	31		$	68		$	87		$	106		$	102		$	394

% of total		8	%		10	%		23	%		41	%		18	%		100	%		8	%		17	%		22	%		28	%		25	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value		65	%		55	%		42	%		41	%		31	%		43	%		65	%		50	%		37	%		36	%		31	%		40	%


																			December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)																			Less than 1.00			1.00 - 1.25			1.26 - 1.50			1.51 - 2.00			Greater than 2.00			Total
Property type:
Retail																			$	5		$	17		$	49		$	62		$	28		$	161
Industrial																				15			10			21			23			30			99
Office																				12			23			4			37			10			86
Apartments																				12			14			7			22			5			60
Mixed use/other																				—			—			—			2			5			7

Total recorded investments																			$	44		$	64		$	81		$	146		$	78		$	413

% of total																				10	%		16	%		20	%		35	%		19	%		100	%

Weighted-average loan-to-value																				73	%		48	%		39	%		36	%		28	%		41	%

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

There were no floating rate restricted commercial mortgage loans as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 or December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

(g) Restricted Other Invested Assets Related To Securitization Entities

We have consolidated securitization entities that hold certain investments that are recorded as restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities. The consolidated securitization entities hold certain investments as trading securities whereby the changes in fair value are recorded in current period ~~income (loss).~~income. The trading securities are comprised of asset-backed securities, including residual interest in certain policy loan securitization entities and highly rated bonds that are primarily backed by credit card receivables.

(5) Derivative Instruments

Our business activities routinely deal with fluctuations in interest rates, equity prices, currency exchange rates and other asset and liability prices. We use derivative instruments to mitigate or reduce certain of these risks. We have established policies for managing each of these risks, including prohibitions on derivatives market-making and other speculative derivatives activities. These policies require the use of derivative instruments in concert with other techniques to reduce or mitigate these risks. While we use derivatives to mitigate or reduce risks, certain derivatives do not meet the accounting requirements to be designated as hedging instruments and are denoted as “derivatives not designated as hedges” in the following disclosures. For derivatives that meet the accounting requirements to be designated as hedges, the following disclosures for these derivatives are denoted as “derivatives designated as hedges,” which include both cash flow and fair value hedges.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth our positions in derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:


	Derivative assets							Derivative liabilities
(Amounts in millions)															Derivative assets							Derivative liabilities
	Balance sheet classification	Fair value						Balance sheet classification		Fair value					Balance sheet classification		Fair value					Balance sheet classification		Fair value
	Balance sheet classification	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010				June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			Balance sheet classification	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			Balance sheet classification	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Derivatives designated as hedges								Balance sheet classification
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Other invested assets	$	264		$	222		Other liabilities		$	62		$	56	Other invested assets		$	250		$	602	Other liabilities		$	88		$	1
Forward bond purchase commitments															Other invested assets			3			47	Other liabilities			4			—
Inflation indexed swaps	Other invested assets		—			—		Other liabilities			61			33	Other invested assets			—			—	Other liabilities			74			43
Foreign currency swaps	Other invested assets		—			205		Other liabilities			—			—	Other invested assets			1			—	Other liabilities			—			—

Total cash flow hedges			264			427					123			89				254			649				166			44

Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Other invested assets		69			95		Other liabilities			4			8	Other invested assets			34			43	Other liabilities			1			1
Foreign currency swaps	Other invested assets		46			35		Other liabilities			—			—	Other invested assets			36			32	Other liabilities			—			—

Total fair value hedges			115			130					4			8				70			75				1			1

Total derivatives designated as hedges			379			557					127			97				324			724				167			45

Derivatives not designated as hedges
Interest rate swaps	Other invested assets		386			446		Other liabilities			21			74
Equity return swaps	Other invested assets		6			—		Other liabilities			1			3
Interest rate swap															Other invested assets			511			705	Other liabilities			286			374
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities	Restricted other invested assets		—			—		Other liabilities			18			19	Restricted other invested assets			—			—	Other liabilities			25			28
Interest rate swaptions	Other invested assets		—			—		Other liabilities			—			—
Credit default swaps	Other invested assets		9			11		Other liabilities			9			7	Other invested assets			4			1	Other liabilities			24			59
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities	Restricted other invested assets		—			—		Other liabilities			126			129	Restricted other invested assets			—			—	Other liabilities			147			177
Equity index options	Other invested assets		40			33		Other liabilities			—			3	Other invested assets			18			39	Other liabilities			—			—
Financial futures	Other invested assets		—			—		Other liabilities			—			—	Other invested assets			—			—	Other liabilities			—			—
Equity return swaps															Other invested assets			1			7	Other liabilities			6			4
Other foreign currency contracts	Other invested assets		—			—		Other liabilities			12			—	Other invested assets			2			9	Other liabilities			18			11
Reinsurance embedded derivatives ⁽¹⁾	Other assets		—			1		Other liabilities			1			—	Other assets			17			29	Other liabilities			—			—
GMWB embedded derivatives	Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾		(5	)		(5	)	Policyholder account balances ⁽³⁾			113			121	Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾			6			16	Policyholder account balances ⁽³⁾			287			492

Total derivatives not designated as hedges			436			486					301			356				559			806				793			1,145

Total derivatives		$	815		$	1,043				$	428		$	453			$	883		$	1,530			$	960		$	1,190

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with certain reinsurance agreements.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) liabilities.

⁽³⁾	Represents the embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The fair value of derivative positions presented above was not offset by the respective collateral amounts retained or provided under these agreements. The amounts recognized for derivative counterparty collateral retained by us was recorded in other invested assets with a corresponding amount recorded in other liabilities to represent our obligation to return the collateral retained by us.

The activity associated with derivative instruments can generally be measured by the change in notional value over the periods presented. However, for GMWB embedded derivatives, the change between periods is best illustrated by the number of policies. The following tables represent activity associated with derivative instruments as of the dates indicated:


(Notional in millions)	Measurement	December 31, 2010		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			June 30, 2011		Measurement	December 31, 2011		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2012
Derivatives designated as hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Notional	$	12,355	$	995	$	(157	)	$	13,193	Notional	$	12,399	$	—	$	(3	)	$	12,396
Forward bond purchase commitments											Notional		504		—		—			504
Inflation indexed swaps	Notional		525		16		—			541	Notional		544		5		—			549
Foreign currency swaps	Notional		491		—		(491	)		—	Notional		—		87		—			87

Total cash flow hedges			13,371		1,011		(648	)		13,734			13,447		92		(3	)		13,536

Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Notional		1,764		—		(405	)		1,359	Notional		1,039		—		(22	)		1,017
Foreign currency swaps	Notional		85		—		—			85	Notional		85		—		—			85

Total fair value hedges			1,849		—		(405	)		1,444			1,124		—		(22	)		1,102

Total derivatives designated as hedges			15,220		1,011		(1,053	)		15,178			14,571		92		(25	)		14,638

Derivatives not designated as hedges
Interest rate swaps	Notional		7,681		314		(1,550	)		6,445	Notional		7,200		680		(531	)		7,349
Equity return swaps	Notional		208		139		—			347
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities	Notional		129		—		(6	)		123	Notional		117		—		(3	)		114
Interest rate swaptions	Notional		200		—		(200	)		—
Credit default swaps	Notional		1,195		115		(100	)		1,210	Notional		1,110		—		(30	)		1,080
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities	Notional		317		—		—			317	Notional		314		—		—			314
Equity index options	Notional		744		521		(480	)		785	Notional		522		300		(94	)		728
Financial futures	Notional		3,937		2,687		(3,463	)		3,161	Notional		2,924		1,156		(1,935	)		2,145
Equity return swaps											Notional		326		14		(68	)		272
Other foreign currency contracts	Notional		521		185		(535	)		171	Notional		779		358		(14	)		1,123
Reinsurance embedded derivatives	Notional		72		89		—			161	Notional		228		24		—			252

Total derivatives not designated as hedges			15,004		4,050		(6,334	)		12,720			13,520		2,532		(2,675	)		13,377

Total derivatives		$	30,224	$	5,061	$	(7,387	)	$	27,898		$	28,091	$	2,624	$	(2,700	)	$	28,015


(Number of policies)	Measurement	December 31, 2010		Additions		Terminations			June 30, 2011		Measurement	December 31, 2011		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2012
Derivatives not designated as hedges
GMWB embedded derivatives	Policies		49,566		690		(1,326	)		48,930	Policies		47,716		1		(633	)		47,084

We did not have any derivatives with counterparties that can be terminated at the option of the derivative counterparty as of March 31, 2012.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Approximately $125 million of notional value above is related to derivatives with counterparties that can be terminated at the option of the derivative counterparty and represented a net fair value asset of $1 million as of June 30, 2011.

Cash Flow Hedges

Certain derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. The changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded as a component of OCI. We designate and account for the following as cash flow hedges when they have met the effectiveness requirements: (i) various types of interest rate swaps to convert floating rate investments to fixed rate investments; (ii) various types of interest rate swaps to convert floating rate liabilities into fixed rate liabilities; (iii) receive U.S. dollar fixed on foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated investments; (iv) pay U.S. dollar fixed on foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure on liabilities denominated in foreign currencies; (v) forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge against changes in interest rates associated with future ~~fixed-rate~~fixed rate bond purchases and/or interest income; (vi) forward bond purchase commitments to hedge against the variability in the anticipated cash flows required to purchase future fixed rate bonds; and ~~(vi)~~(vii) other instruments to hedge the cash flows of various forecasted transactions.

The following table provides information about the pre-tax income ~~(loss)~~ effects of cash flow hedges for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011:~~March 31, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI		Gain (loss) reclassified into net income (loss) from OCI			Classification of gain (loss) reclassified into net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) ⁽¹⁾		Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI			Gain (loss) reclassified into net income from OCI		Classification of gain (loss) reclassified into net income	Gain (loss) recognized in net income ⁽¹⁾			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	113	$	(6	)	Net investment income	$	2	Net investment gains (losses)	$	(421	)	$	9	Net investment income		$(16)		Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities		—		1		Interest expense		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets											—			1	Net investment gains (losses)		—		Net investment gains (losses)
Inflation indexed swaps											(31	)		—	Net investment income		—		Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		1		(4	)	Interest expense		—	Net investment gains (losses)		1			—	Interest expense		—		Net investment gains (losses)
Forward bond purchase commitments											(48	)		—	Net investment income		—		Net investment gains (losses)

Total	$	114	$	(9	)		$	2		$	(499	)	$	10		$	(16	)

⁽¹⁾	Represents ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as there were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.

The following table provides information about the pre-tax income ~~(loss)~~ effects of cash flow hedges for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010:~~March 31, 2011:


(Amounts in millions)	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI			Gain (loss) reclassified into net income (loss) from OCI			Classification of gain (loss) reclassified into net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) ⁽¹⁾		Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI			Gain (loss) reclassified into net income from OCI			Classification of gain (loss) reclassified into net income	Gain (loss) recognized in net income ⁽¹⁾			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	599		$	4		Net investment income	$	15	Net investment gains (losses)	$	(100	)	$	5		Net investment income	$	(2	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities		(3	)		1		Interest expense		—	Net investment gains (losses)
Inflation indexed swaps												(1	)		(10	)	Net investment income		—		Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		6			(2	)	Interest expense		—	Net investment gains (losses)		3			(1	)	Interest expense		—		Net investment gains (losses)

Total	$	602		$	3			$	15		$	(98	)	$	(6	)		$	(2	)

⁽¹⁾	Represents ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as there were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table provides ~~information about~~a reconciliation of current period changes, net of applicable income taxes, for these designated derivatives presented in the ~~pre-tax income (loss) effects~~separate component of ~~cash flow~~stockholders’ equity labeled “derivatives qualifying as hedges,” for the ~~six months ended June 30, 2011:~~periods indicated:

(Amounts in millions)
Gain (loss)
recognized in OCI Gain (loss)
reclassified into
net income (loss)
from OCI
Classification of gain
(loss) reclassified into
net income (loss)
Gain (loss)
recognized in
net income (loss) ⁽¹⁾
Classification of gain
(loss) recognized in
net income (loss)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets
$ 12    $ (11 ) Net investment income $ —      Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities
—      1    Interest expense —      Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps
4    (5 ) Interest expense —      Net investment gains (losses)

Total
$ 16    $ (15 ) $ —

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as there were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.~~

~~The following table provides information about the pre-tax income (loss) effects of cash flow hedges for the six months ended June 30, 2010:~~

(Amounts in millions)
Gain (loss)
recognized in OCI Gain (loss)
reclassified into
net income (loss)
from OCI
Classification of gain
(loss) reclassified into
net income (loss)
Gain (loss)
recognized in
net income (loss) ⁽¹⁾
Classification of gain
(loss) recognized in
net income (loss)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets
$ 563    $ 8    Net investment income $ 12    Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets
—      1    Net investment gains (losses) —      Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities
(3 ) 1    Interest expense —      Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps
7    (4 ) Interest expense —      Net investment gains (losses)

Total
$ 567    $ 6    $ 12

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents ineffective portion of cash flow hedges as there were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.~~


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
Derivatives qualifying as effective accounting hedges as of January 1	$	2,009		$	924
Current period increases (decreases) in fair value, net of deferred taxes of $177 and $34		(322	)		(64	)
Reclassification to net (income), net of deferred taxes of $3 and $(2)		(7	)		4

Derivatives qualifying as effective accounting hedges as of March 31	$	1,680		$	864

The total of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of ~~$943~~$1,680 million, net of taxes, recorded in stockholders’ equity as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 is expected to be reclassified to future net income, ~~(loss),~~ concurrently with and primarily offsetting changes in interest expense and interest income on ~~floating-rate~~floating rate instruments and interest income on future ~~fixed-rate~~fixed rate bond purchases. Of this amount, ~~$23~~$27 million, net of taxes, is expected to be reclassified to net income ~~(loss)~~ in the next 12 months. Actual amounts may vary from this amount as a result of market conditions. All forecasted transactions associated with qualifying cash flow hedges are expected to occur by 2045. No amounts were reclassified to net income ~~(loss)~~ during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 in connection with forecasted transactions that were no longer considered probable of occurring.

Fair Value Hedges

Certain derivative instruments are designated as fair value hedges. The changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in net ~~income (loss).~~income. In addition, changes in the fair value attributable to the hedged

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

portion of the underlying instrument are reported in net ~~income (loss).~~income. We designate and account for the following as fair value hedges when they have met the effectiveness requirements: (i) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate investments to floating rate investments; (ii) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate liabilities into floating rate liabilities; (iii) cross currency swaps to convert non-U.S. dollar fixed rate liabilities to floating rate U.S. dollar liabilities; and (iv) other instruments to hedge various fair value exposures of investments.

The following table provides information about the pre-tax income ~~(loss)~~ effects of fair value hedges and related hedged items for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011:~~March 31, 2012:

Derivative instrument Hedged item
(Amounts in millions)
Gain (loss)
recognized in
net income (loss)
Classification
of gain (loss)
recognized in
net income
(loss)
Other impacts
to net
income (loss)
Classification
of other
impacts to
net income
(loss)
Gain (loss)
recognized in
net income (loss)
Classification
of gain (loss)
recognized in
net
income (loss)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets
$ 1    Net investment gains (losses) $ (2 ) Net investment income $ (1 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities
(7 ) Net investment gains (losses) 17    Interest credited 7    Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps
11    Net investment gains (losses) —      Interest credited (11 ) Net investment gains (losses)

Total
$ 5    $ 15    $ (5 )

~~The following table provides information about the pre-tax income (loss) effects of fair value hedges and related hedged items for the three months ended June 30, 2010:~~


	Derivative instrument								Hedged item				Derivative instrument								Hedged item
(Amounts in millions)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)	Other impacts to net income (loss)			Classification of other impacts to net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income			Classification of gain (losses) recognized in net income	Other impacts to net income			Classification of other impacts to net income	Gain (loss) recognized in net income			Classification of gain (losses) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	1		Net investment gains (losses)	$	(3	)	Net investment income	$	(1	)	Net investment gains (losses)	$	—		Net investment gains (losses)	$	(1	)	Net investment income	$	—		Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities		(6	)	Net investment gains (losses)		25		Interest credited		6		Net investment gains (losses)		(9	)	Net investment gains (losses)		11		Interest credited		9		Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		(2	)	Net investment gains (losses)		1		Interest credited		2		Net investment gains (losses)		3		Net investment gains (losses)		1		Interest credited		(4	)	Net investment gains (losses)

Total	$	(7	)		$	23			$	7			$	(6	)		$	11			$	5

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table provides information about the pre-tax income ~~(loss)~~ effects of fair value hedges and related hedged items for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2011:

Derivative instrument Hedged item
(Amounts in millions)
Gain (loss)
recognized in
net income (loss)
Classification
of gain (loss)
recognized in
net income
(loss)
Other impacts
to net
income (loss)
Classification
of other
impacts to
net income
(loss)
Gain (loss)
recognized in
net income (loss)
Classification
of gain (loss)
recognized in
net
income (loss)
Interest rate swaps hedging assets
$ 2    Net investment gains (losses) $ (5 ) Net investment income $ (2 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities
(29 ) Net investment gains (losses) 37    Interest credited 29    Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps
11    Net investment gains (losses) 1    Interest credited (12 ) Net investment gains (losses)

Total
$ (16 ) $ 33    $ 15

~~The following table provides information about the pre-tax income (loss) effects of fair value hedges and related hedged items for the six months ended June 30, 2010:~~


	Derivative instrument								Hedged item				Derivative instrument								Hedged item
(Amounts in millions)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)	Other impacts to net income (loss)			Classification of other impacts to net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)	Gain (loss) recognized in net income			Classification of gain (losses) recognized in net income	Other impacts to net income			Classification of other impacts to net income	Gain (loss) recognized in net income			Classification of gain (losses) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps hedging assets	$	2		Net investment gains (losses)	$	(6	)	Net investment income	$	(2	)	Net investment gains (losses)	$	1		Net investment gains (losses)	$	(3	)	Net investment income	$	(1	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps hedging liabilities		(7	)	Net investment gains (losses)		50		Interest credited		7		Net investment gains (losses)		(22	)	Net investment gains (losses)		20		Interest credited		22		Net investment gains (losses)
Foreign currency swaps		(4	)	Net investment gains (losses)		2		Interest credited		4		Net investment gains (losses)		—		Net investment gains (losses)		1		Interest credited		(1	)	Net investment gains (losses)

Total	$	(9	)		$	46			$	9			$	(21	)		$	18			$	20

The difference between the gain (loss) recognized for the derivative instrument and the hedged item presented above represents the net ineffectiveness of the fair value hedging relationships. The other impacts presented above represent the net income ~~(loss)~~ effects of the derivative instruments that are presented in the same location as the income (loss) activity from the hedged item. There were no amounts excluded from the measurement of effectiveness.

Derivatives Not Designated As Hedges

We also enter into certain non-qualifying derivative instruments such as: (i) interest rate swaps, swaptions and financial futures to mitigate interest rate risk as part of managing regulatory capital positions; (ii) credit default swaps to enhance yield and reproduce characteristics of investments with similar terms and credit risk; (iii) equity index options, equity return swaps, interest rate swaps and financial futures to mitigate the risks associated with liabilities that have guaranteed minimum benefits; (iv) interest rate swaps where the hedging relationship does not qualify for hedge accounting; (v) credit default swaps to mitigate loss exposure to certain credit risk; (vi) foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate currency risk associated with future dividends and other cash flows from certain foreign subsidiaries to our holding company; and (vii) equity index options and credit default swaps

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

to mitigate certain macroeconomic risks associated with certain foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, we provide GMWBs on certain products that are required to be bifurcated as embedded derivatives and have reinsurance agreements with certain features that are required to be bifurcated as embedded derivatives.

We also have derivatives related to securitization entities where we were required to consolidate the related securitization entity as a result of our involvement in the structure. The counterparties for these derivatives typically only have recourse to the securitization entity. The interest rate swaps used for these entities are typically used to effectively convert the interest payments on the assets of the securitization entity to the same basis as the interest rate on the borrowings issued by the securitization entity. Credit default swaps are utilized in certain securitization entities to enhance the yield payable on the borrowings issued by the securitization entity and also include a settlement feature that allows the securitization entity to provide the par value of assets in the securitization entity for the amount of any losses incurred under the credit default swap.

~~The following table provides the pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) for the effects of derivatives not designated as hedges for the periods indicated:~~

Three months ended June 30,
Classification of gain (loss) recognized
in net income (loss)
(Amounts in millions)
       2011               2010
Interest rate swaps
$ 2    $ 63    Net investment gains (losses)
Equity return swaps
(6 ) —      Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities
(4 ) (9 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaptions
—      35    Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps
—      (32 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities
(4 ) (46 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Equity index options
(9 ) 50    Net investment gains (losses)
Financial futures
34    105    Net investment gains (losses)
Other foreign currency contracts
(4 ) 2    Net investment gains (losses)
Reinsurance embedded derivatives
(1 ) 2    Net investment gains (losses)
GMWB embedded derivatives
(33 ) (278 ) Net investment gains (losses)

Total derivatives not designated as hedges
$ (25 ) $ (108 )

~~The following table provides the pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss) for the effects of derivatives not designated as hedges for the periods indicated:~~

Six months ended June 30,
Classification of gain (loss) recognized
in net income (loss)
(Amounts in millions)
    2011         2010
Interest rate swaps
$ 4    $ 57    Net investment gains (losses)
Equity return swaps
(10 ) —      Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities
(3 ) (12 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaptions
—      57    Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps
3    (27 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities
5    (41 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Equity index options
(28 ) 23    Net investment gains (losses)
Financial futures
(5 ) 72    Net investment gains (losses)
Other foreign currency contracts
(13 ) (1 ) Net investment gains (losses)
Reinsurance embedded derivatives
(1 ) 2    Net investment gains (losses)
GMWB embedded derivatives
26    (242 ) Net investment gains (losses)

Total derivatives not designated as hedges
$ (22 ) $ (112 )

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table provides the pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in net income for the effects of derivatives not designated as hedges for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income
Interest rate swaps	$	1		$	2		Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		2			1		Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps		41			3		Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		31			9		Net investment gains (losses)
Equity index options		(35	)		(19	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Financial futures		(112	)		(39	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Equity return swaps		(25	)		(4	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Other foreign currency contracts		(17	)		(9	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Reinsurance embedded derivatives		(12	)		—		Net investment gains (losses)
GMWB embedded derivatives		201			59		Net investment gains (losses)

Total derivatives not designated as hedges	$	75		$	3

Derivative Counterparty Credit Risk

As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, net fair value assets by counterparty totaled ~~$691~~$551 million and ~~$888~~$1,027 million, respectively. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, net fair value liabilities by counterparty totaled ~~$186~~$364 million and ~~$172~~$240 million, respectively. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we retained collateral of ~~$704~~$589 million and ~~$794~~$1,023 million, respectively, related to these agreements, including over collateralization of ~~$86~~$63 million and ~~$29~~$50 million, respectively, from certain counterparties. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we posted ~~$23~~$181 million and ~~$30~~$28 million, respectively, of collateral to derivative counterparties, including over collateralization of $1$14 million and $11 million, respectively. For derivatives related to securitization entities, there are no arrangements that require either party to provide collateral and the recourse of the derivative counterparty is typically limited to the assets held by the securitization entity and there is no recourse to any entity other than the securitization entity.

Except for derivatives related to securitization entities, all of our master swap agreements contain credit downgrade provisions that allow either party to assign or terminate derivative transactions if the other party’s long-term unsecured debt rating or financial strength rating is below the limit defined in the applicable agreement. If the downgrade provisions had been triggered as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we could have been allowed to claim up to ~~$73~~$25 million and ~~$123~~$54 million, respectively, from counterparties and required to disburse up to ~~$20~~$25 million and $5$18 million, respectively. This represented the net fair value of gains and losses by counterparty, less available collateral held, and did not include any fair value gains or losses for derivatives related to securitization entities.

Credit Derivatives

We sell protection under single name credit default swaps and credit default swap index tranches in combination with purchasing securities to replicate characteristics of similar investments based on the credit quality and term of the credit default swap. Credit default triggers for both indexed reference entities and single

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

name reference entities follow the Credit Derivatives Physical Settlement Matrix published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. Under these terms, credit default triggers are defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay or restructuring, if applicable. Our maximum exposure to credit loss equals the notional value for credit default swaps. In the event of default for credit default swaps, we are typically required to pay the protection holder the full notional value less a recovery rate determined at auction.

In addition to the credit derivatives discussed above, we also have credit derivative instruments related to securitization entities that we consolidated in 2010. These derivatives represent a customized index of reference entities with specified attachment points for certain derivatives. The credit default triggers are similar to those described above. In the event of default, the securitization entity will provide the counterparty with the par value of assets held in the securitization entity for the amount of incurred loss on the credit default swap. The maximum exposure to loss for the securitization entity is the notional value of the derivatives. Certain losses on these credit default swaps would be absorbed by the third-party noteholders of the securitization entity and the remaining losses on the credit default swaps would be absorbed by our portion of the notes issued by the securitization entity.

The following table sets forth our credit default swaps where we sell protection on single name reference entities and the fair values as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Notional value		Assets		Liabilities		Notional value		Assets		Liabilities
Reference entity credit rating and maturity:
AAA
Matures after one year through five years	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	—
AA
Matures after one year through five years		6		—		—		6		—		—
Matures after five years through ten years		5		—		—		5		—		—
A
Matures after one year through five years		37		—		—		37		—		—
Matures after five years through ten years		10		—		—		10		—		1
BBB
Matures after one year through five years		68		1		—		68		1		—
Matures after five years through ten years		24		—		1		24		—		1

Total credit default swaps on single name reference entities	$	155	$	1	$	1	$	155	$	1	$	2

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth our credit default swaps where we sell protection on ~~single name reference entities and the fair values as of the dates indicated:~~

   June 30, 2011    December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)
   Notional
value    Assets    Liabilities    Notional
value    Assets    Liabilities
Reference entity credit rating and maturity:

AAA

Matures after one year through five years
   $ 5       $ —         $ —         $ 5       $ —         $ —
AA

Matures after one year through five years
   6       —         —         6       —         —
Matures after five years through ten years
   5       —         —         5       —         —
A

Matures after one year through five years
   37       1       —         37       1       —
Matures after five years through ten years
   10       —         —         5       —         —
BBB

Matures after one year through five years
   68       1       —         68       2       —
Matures after five years through ten years
   24       —         —         29       —         —

Total credit default swaps on single name reference entities
   $ 155       $ 2       $ —         $ 155       $ 3       $ —

~~The following table sets forth our credit default swaps where we sell protection on~~ credit default swap index tranches and the fair values as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010						March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Notional value		Assets		Liabilities		Notional value		Assets		Liabilities		Notional value		Assets		Liabilities		Notional value		Assets		Liabilities
Original index tranche attachment/detachment point and maturity:
9% – 12% matures after one year through five years ⁽¹⁾	$	300	$	1	$	4	$	300	$	—	$	3	$	300	$	—	$	9	$	300	$	—	$	27
10% – 15% matures after one year through five years ⁽²⁾		250		3		—		250		4		—		250		3		—		250		—		—
12% – 22% matures after five years through ten years ⁽³⁾		248		—		5		248		—		4		248		—		14		248		—		28
15% – 30% matures after five years through ten years ⁽⁴⁾		127		—		—		127		2		—		127		—		—		127		—		2

Total credit default swap index tranches		925		4		9		925		6		7		925		3		23		925		—		57

Customized credit default swap index tranches related to securitization entities:
Portion backing third-party borrowings maturing 2017 ⁽⁵⁾		17		—		7		17		—		8		14		—		6		14		—		7
Portion backing our interest maturing 2017⁽⁶⁾		300		—		119		300		—		121		300		—		141		300		—		170

Total customized credit default swap index tranches related to securitization entities		317		—		126		317		—		129		314		—		147		314		—		177

Total credit default swaps on index tranches	$	1,242	$	4	$	135	$	1,242	$	6	$	136	$	1,239	$	3	$	170	$	1,239	$	—	$	234

⁽¹⁾	The current attachment/detachment as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 was 9% – 12%.

⁽²⁾	The current attachment/detachment as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 was 10% – 15%.

⁽³⁾	The current attachment/detachment as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 was 12% – 22%.

⁽⁴⁾	The current attachment/detachment as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 was 14.8% – 30.3%.

⁽⁵⁾	Original notional value was $39 million.

⁽⁶⁾	Original notional value was $300 million.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities that are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at fair value are not included in the following disclosure of fair value. Such items include cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, separate accounts, securities held as collateral and derivative instruments. Other financial assets and liabilities—those not carried at fair value—are discussed below. Apart from certain of our borrowings and certain marketable securities, few of the instruments discussed below are actively traded and their fair values must often be determined using models. The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based upon available market information and judgments about the financial instruments, including estimates of the timing and amount of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of counterparties. Such estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, nor do they consider the tax impact of the realization of unrealized gains or losses. In many cases, the fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets.

The basis on which we estimate fair value is as follows:

Commercial mortgage loans. Based on recent transactions and/or discounted future cash flows, using current market rates. Given the limited availability of data related to transactions for similar instruments, we typically classify these loans as Level 3.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Restricted commercial mortgage loans. Based on recent transactions and/or discounted future cash flows, using current market rates. Given the limited availability of data related to transactions for similar instruments, we typically classify these loans as Level 3.

Other invested assets.Based on comparable market transactions, discounted future cash flows, quoted market prices and/or estimates using the most recent data available for the related instrument. Primarily represents short-term investments and limited partnerships accounted for under the cost method. The fair value of short-term investments typically does not include significant unobservable inputs and approximate our amortized cost basis. As a result, short-term investments are classified as Level 2. Cost method limited partnerships typically include significant unobservable inputs as a result of being relatively illiquid with limited market activity for similar instruments and are classified as Level 3.

Long-term borrowings.~~Based~~We utilize available market data when determining fair value of long-term borrowings issued in the U.S. and Canada, which includes data on recent trades for the same or similar financial instruments. Accordingly, these instruments are classified as Level 2 measurements. In cases where market data is not available such as our Australian borrowings, we use broker quotes ~~or comparable market transactions.~~for which we consider the valuation methodology utilized by the third party but cannot typically obtain sufficient evidence to determine the valuation does not include significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, we typically classify these borrowings where fair value is based on our consideration of broker quotes as Level 3 measurements.

Non-recourse funding obligations. ~~Based on~~We use an internal model to determine fair value using the ~~then~~ current ~~coupon, revalued based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and current spread assumption based on commercially available data. The model is a~~ floating rate coupon ~~model~~and expected life/final maturity of the instrument discounted using the floating rate index and current market spread assumption, which is estimated based on recent transactions for these instruments or similar instruments as well as other market information or broker provided data. Given these instruments are private and very little market activity exists, our current market spread assumption is considered to ~~derive~~have significant unobservable inputs in calculating fair value and, therefore, results in the ~~valuation.~~fair value of these instruments being classified as Level 3.

Borrowings related to securitization entities.Based on market quotes or comparable market transactions. Some of these borrowings are publicly traded debt securities and are classified as Level 2. Certain borrowings are not publicly traded and are classified as Level 3.

Investment contracts.Based on expected future cash flows, discounted at current market rates for annuity contracts or institutional products. Given the significant unobservable inputs associated with policyholder behavior and current market rate assumptions used to discount the expected future cash flows, we classify these instruments as Level 3 except for certain funding agreement-backed notes that are traded in the marketplace as a security and are classified as Level 2.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following represents ~~the~~our estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are not required to be carried at fair value as of the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)															March 31, 2012
	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010							Notional amount			Carrying amount		Fair value
	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Fair value		Notional amount			Carrying amount		Fair value		Notional amount			Carrying amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Commercial mortgage loans	$		⁽¹⁾	$	6,432	$	6,742	$		⁽¹⁾	$	6,718	$	6,896	$		⁽¹⁾	$	6,030	$	—	$	—	$	6,462	$	6,462
Restricted commercial mortgage loans			⁽¹⁾		457		506			⁽¹⁾		507		554			⁽¹⁾		392		—		—		441		441
Other invested assets			⁽¹⁾		282		293			⁽¹⁾		267		272			⁽¹⁾		343		—		217		133		350
Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		4,755		4,766			⁽¹⁾		4,952		4,928			⁽¹⁾		5,095		—		4,926		145		5,071
Non-recourse funding obligations⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		3,374		2,339			⁽¹⁾		3,437		2,170			⁽¹⁾		2,602		—		—		1,760		1,760
Borrowings related to securitization entities			⁽¹⁾		394		417			⁽¹⁾		443		467			⁽¹⁾		328		—		273		83		356
Investment contracts			⁽¹⁾		18,728		19,365			⁽¹⁾		19,772		20,471			⁽¹⁾		18,616		—		1,369		18,224		19,593
Other firm commitments:
Commitments to fund limited partnerships		90			—		—		110			—		—		71			—		—		—		—		—
Ordinary course of business lending commitments		49			—		—		28			—		—		15			—		—		—		—		—


(Amounts in millions)	December 31, 2011
	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Fair value
	Notional amount			Carrying amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Commercial mortgage loans	$		⁽¹⁾	$	6,092	$	—	$	—	$	6,500	$	6,500
Restricted commercial mortgage loans			⁽¹⁾		411		—		—		461		461
Other invested assets			⁽¹⁾		786		—		658		137		795
Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		4,726		—		4,214		139		4,353
Non-recourse funding obligations⁽²⁾			⁽¹⁾		3,256		—		—		2,160		2,160
Borrowings related to securitization entities			⁽¹⁾		348		—		287		88		375
Investment contracts			⁽¹⁾		18,880		—		1,356		18,325		19,681
Other firm commitments:
Commitments to fund limited partnerships		78			—		—		—		—		—
Ordinary course of business lending commitments		9			—		—		—		—		—

⁽¹⁾	These financial instruments do not have notional amounts.

⁽²⁾	See note 8 for additional information related to borrowings.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

We have fixed maturity, equity and trading securities, derivatives, embedded derivatives, securities held as collateral, separate account assets and certain other financial instruments, which are carried at fair value. Below is a description of the valuation techniques and inputs used to determine fair value by class of instrument.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Fixed maturity, equity and trading securities

The valuations of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities are determined using a market approach, income approach or a combination of the market and income approach depending on the type of instrument and availability of information.

We utilize certain third-party data providers when determining fair value. We consider information obtained from third-party pricing services (“pricing services”) as well as third-party broker provided prices, or broker quotes, in our determination of fair value. Additionally, we utilize internal models to determine the valuation of securities using an income approach where the inputs are based on third-party provided market inputs. While we consider the valuations provided by ~~third-party~~ pricing services and broker quotes, management determines the fair value of our investment securities after considering all relevant and available information. We also use various methods to obtain an understanding of the valuation methodologies and procedures used by third-party data providers to ensure sufficient understanding to evaluate the valuation data received, including an understanding of the assumptions and inputs utilized to determine the appropriate fair value. Additionally, we evaluate significant changes in fair value each month to further aide in our review of the accuracy our fair value measurements and understanding of changes in fair value, where more detailed reviews are performed by the asset managers responsible for the related asset class associated with the security being reviewed.

In general, we first obtain valuations from pricing services. If a price is not supplied by a pricing service, we will typically seek a broker quote. For certain private fixed maturity securities where we do not obtain valuations from pricing services, we utilize an internal model to determine fair value since transactions for identical

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

securities are not readily observable and these securities are not typically valued by pricing services. For all securities, excluding certain private fixed maturity securities, if neither a pricing service nor broker ~~quote~~quotes valuation is available, we determine fair value using internal models.

For pricing services, we obtain an understanding of the pricing methodologies and procedures for each type of instrument. In general, a pricing service does not provide a price for a security if sufficient information is not readily available to determine fair value or if such security is not in the specific sector or class covered by a particular pricing service. Given our understanding of the pricing methodologies and procedures of pricing services, the securities valued by pricing services are typically classified as Level 2 unless we determine the valuation process for a security or group of securities utilizes significant unobservable ~~inputs.~~inputs, which would result in the valuation being classified as Level 3.

For private fixed maturity securities, we utilize an internal model to determine fair value and utilize public bond spreads by sector, rating and maturity to develop the market rate that would be utilized for a similar public bond. We then add an additional premium, which represents an unobservable input, to the public bond spread to adjust for the liquidity and other features of our private placements. We utilize the estimated market yield to discount the expected cash flows of the security to determine fair value. We assign each security an internal rating to determine the appropriate public bond spread that should be utilized in the valuation. While we generally consider the public bond spreads by sector and maturity to be observable inputs, we evaluate the similarities of our private placement with the public bonds and whether external ratings are available for our private placement to determine whether the spreads utilized would be considered observable ~~inputs~~inputs. In general, increases (decreases) in credit spreads will decrease (increase) the fair value for ~~the private placement being valued.~~our fixed maturity securities. To determine the significance of unobservable inputs, we calculate the impact on the valuation from the unobservable input and will classify a security as Level 3 when the impact on the valuation exceeds 10%.

For broker quotes, we consider the valuation methodology utilized by the third party but cannot typically obtain sufficient evidence to determine the valuation does not include significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, we typically classify the securities where fair value is based on our consideration of broker quotes as Level 3 measurements.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For remaining securities priced using internal models, we maximize the use of observable inputs but typically utilize significant unobservable inputs to determine fair value. Accordingly, the valuations are typically classified as Level 3.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The following tables summarize the primary sources of data considered when determining fair value of each class of fixed maturity securities as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011								March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises:
Pricing services	$	3,669	$	—	$	3,669	$	—	$	4,564	$	—	$	4,564	$	—
Internal models		13		—		—		13		10		—		9		1

Total U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises		3,682		—		3,669		13		4,574		—		4,573		1

Tax-exempt:
Pricing services		865		—		865		—		341		—		341		—

Total tax-exempt		865		—		865		—		341		—		341		—

Government—non-U.S.:
Pricing services		2,378		—		2,378		—		2,282		—		2,282		—
Internal models		11		—		10		1		9		—		—		9

Total government—non-U.S.		2,389		—		2,388		1		2,291		—		2,282		9

U.S. corporate:
Pricing services		20,787		—		20,787		—		22,194		—		22,194		—
Broker quotes		277		—		—		277		256		—		—		256
Internal models		2,983		—		2,311		672		2,757		—		583		2,174

Total U.S. corporate		24,047		—		23,098		949		25,207		—		22,777		2,430

Corporate—non-U.S.:
Pricing services		12,568		—		12,568		—		12,436		—		12,436		—
Broker quotes		86		—		—		86		79		—		—		79
Internal models		1,774		—		1,489		285		1,927		—		397		1,530

Total corporate—non-U.S.		14,428		—		14,057		371		14,442		—		12,833		1,609

Residential mortgage-backed:
Pricing services		4,859		—		4,859		—		5,757		—		5,757		—
Broker quotes		63		—		—		63		39		—		—		39
Internal models		61		—		—		61		56		—		—		56

Total residential mortgage-backed		4,983		—		4,859		124		5,852		—		5,757		95

Commercial mortgage-backed:
Pricing services		3,678		—		3,678		—		3,306		—		3,306		—
Broker quotes		16		—		—		16		15		—		—		15
Internal models		27		—		—		27		25		—		—		25

Total commercial mortgage-backed		3,721		—		3,678		43		3,346		—		3,306		40

Other asset-backed:
Pricing services		1,840		—		1,840		—		2,053		—		2,053		—
Broker quotes		265		—		—		265		409		—		—		409
Internal models		1		—		1		—		17		—		7		10

Total other asset-backed		2,106		—		1,841		265		2,479		—		2,060		419

Total fixed maturity securities	$	56,221	$	—	$	54,455	$	1,766	$	58,532	$	—	$	53,929	$	4,603

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2010									December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises:
Pricing services	$	3,688	$	—		$	3,688	$	—	$	4,850	$	—	$	4,850	$	—
Internal models		17		—			6		11		13		—		—		13

Total U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises		3,705		—			3,694		11		4,863		—		4,850		13

Tax-exempt:
Pricing services		1,030		—			1,030		—		503		—		503		—

Total tax-exempt		1,030		—			1,030		—		503		—		503		—

Government—non-U.S.:
Pricing services		2,357		—			2,357		—		2,201		—		2,201		—
Internal models		12		—			11		1		10		—		—		10

Total government—non-U.S.		2,369		—			2,368		1		2,211		—		2,201		10

U.S. corporate:
Pricing services		20,563		—			20,563		—		22,168		—		22,168		—
Broker quotes		235		—			—		235		250		—		—		250
Internal models		3,169		—			2,304		865		2,840		—		579		2,261

Total U.S. corporate		23,967		—			22,867		1,100		25,258		—		22,747		2,511

Corporate—non-U.S.:
Pricing services		11,584		—			11,584		—		11,925		—		11,925		—
Broker quotes		113		—			—		113		78		—		—		78
Internal models		1,801		—			1,546		255		1,754		—		548		1,206

Total corporate—non-U.S.		13,498		—			13,130		368		13,757		—		12,473		1,284

Residential mortgage-backed:
Pricing services		4,312		—			4,312		—		5,600		—		5,600		—
Broker quotes		72		—			—		72		36		—		—		36
Internal models		71		—			—		71		59		—		—		59

Total residential mortgage-backed		4,455		—			4,312		143		5,695		—		5,600		95

Commercial mortgage-backed:
Pricing services		3,693		—			3,693		—		3,361		—		3,361		—
Broker quotes		16		—			—		16		15		—		—		15
Internal models		34		—			—		34		24		—		—		24

Total commercial mortgage-backed		3,743		—	��		3,693		50		3,400		—		3,361		39

Other asset-backed:
Pricing services		2,241		—			2,143		98		2,328		—		2,328		—
Broker quotes		169		—			—		169		271		—		—		271
Internal models		6		—			5		1		9		—		9		—

Total other asset-backed		2,416		—			2,148		268		2,608		—		2,337		271

Total fixed maturity securities	$	55,183	$	—		$	53,242	$	1,941	$	58,295	$	—	$	54,072	$	4,223

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the primary sources of data considered when determining fair value of equity securities as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011								March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Pricing services	$	268	$	260	$	8	$	—	$	339	$	337	$	2	$	—
Broker quotes		6		—		—		6		3		—		—		3
Internal models		100		—		—		100		92		—		—		92

Total equity securities	$	374	$	260	$	8	$	106	$	434	$	337	$	2	$	95


	December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Pricing services	$	245	$	240	$	5	$	—
Broker quotes		6		—		—		6
Internal models		81		—		—		81

Total equity securities	$	332	$	240	$	5	$	87


	December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Pricing services	$	263	$	261	$	2	$	—
Broker quotes		6		—		—		6
Internal models		92		—		—		92

Total equity securities	$	361	$	261	$	2	$	98

The following tables summarize the primary sources of data considered when determining fair value of trading securities as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011								March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Pricing services	$	316	$	—	$	316	$	—	$	484	$	—	$	484	$	—
Broker quotes		291		—		—		291		286		—		—		286

Total trading securities	$	607	$	—	$	316	$	291	$	770	$	—	$	484	$	286


	December 31, 2010
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Pricing services	$	348	$	—	$	348	$	—
Broker quotes		230		—		—		230
Internal models		99		—		—		99

Total trading securities	$	677	$	—	$	348	$	329


	December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Pricing services	$	524	$	—	$	524	$	—
Broker quotes		264		—		—		264

Total trading securities	$	788	$	—	$	524	$	264

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities

We have trading securities related to securitization entities that are classified as restricted other invested assets and are carried at fair value. The trading securities represent asset-backed securities. The valuation for trading securities is determined using a market approach and/or an income approach depending on the availability of information. For certain highly rated asset-backed securities, there is observable market information for transactions of the same or similar instruments, ~~and~~which is provided to us by a third-party pricing service and is classified as Level 2. For certain securities that are not actively traded, we determine fair value after considering third-party broker provided prices or discounted expected cash flows using current yields for similar securities and classify these valuations as Level 3.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Securities lending and derivative counterparty collateral

The fair value of securities held as collateral is primarily based on Level 2 inputs from market information for the collateral that is held on our behalf by the custodian. We determine fair value after considering prices obtained by third-party pricing services.

Separate account assets

The fair value of separate account assets is based on the quoted prices of the underlying fund investments and, therefore, represents Level 1 pricing.

Derivatives

~~In determining the fair value of derivatives, we~~We consider ~~the~~ counterparty collateral arrangements and rights of set-off when evaluating our net credit risk exposure to our derivative counterparties. Accordingly, we are permitted to include consideration of these arrangements when determining whether any incremental adjustment should be made for both the counterparty’s and our non-performance ~~risk.~~risk in measuring fair value for our derivative instruments. As a result of these counterparty arrangements, we determined no incremental adjustment for our non-performance risk or the non-performance risk of the derivative counterparty was required to our derivative assets or liabilities. We determine fair value for our derivatives using an income approach using internal models based on relevant market inputs for each derivative instrument. We also compare the fair value determined using our internal model to the valuations provided by our derivative counterparties with any significant differences or changes in valuation being evaluated further by our derivatives professionals that are familiar with the instrument and market inputs used in the valuation.

Interest rate swaps.The valuation of interest rate swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary input into the valuation represents the forward interest rate swap curve, which is generally considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2. For certain interest rate swaps, the inputs into the valuation also include the total returns of certain bonds that would primarily be considered an observable input and result in the derivative being classified as Level 2. For certain other swaps, there are features that provide an option to the counterparty to terminate the swap at specified ~~dates and~~dates. The interest rate volatility input used to value these options would be considered a significant unobservable input and results in the fair value measurement of the derivative being classified as Level 3. These options to terminate the swap by the counterparty are based on forward interest rate swap curves and volatility. As interest rate volatility increases, our valuation of the derivative changes unfavorably.

Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities.The valuation of interest rate swaps related to securitization entities is determined using an income approach. The primary input into the valuation represents the forward interest rate swap curve, which is generally considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Inflation indexed swaps. The valuation of inflation indexed swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve and consumer price index, which are generally considered observable inputs, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

~~Interest rate swaptions.~~ The valuation of interest rate swaptions is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve, which is generally considered an observable input, forward interest rate volatility and time value component associated with the optionality in the derivative. As a result of the significant unobservable inputs associated with the forward interest rate volatility input, the derivative is classified as Level 3.

Foreign currency swaps. The valuation of foreign currency swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve and foreign currency exchange rates, both of which are considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Credit default swaps. We have both single name credit default swaps and index tranche credit default swaps. For single name credit default swaps, we utilize an income approach to determine fair value based on using current market information for the credit spreads of the reference entity, which is considered observable inputs based on the reference entities of our derivatives and results in these derivatives being classified as Level 2. For index tranche credit default swaps, we utilize an income approach that utilizes current market information related to credit spreads and expected defaults and losses associated with the reference entities that comprise the respective index associated with each derivative. There are significant unobservable inputs associated with the timing and amount of losses from the reference entities as well as the timing or amount of losses, if any, that will be absorbed by our tranche. Accordingly, the index tranche credit default swaps are classified as Level 3. As credit spreads widen for the underlying issuers comprising the index, the change in our valuation of these credit default swaps will be unfavorable.

Credit default swaps related to securitization entities.Credit default swaps related to securitization entities represent customized index tranche credit default swaps and are valued using a similar methodology as described above for index tranche credit default swaps. We determine fair value of these credit default swaps after considering both the valuation methodology described above as well as the valuation provided by the derivative counterparty. In addition to the valuation methodology and inputs described for index tranche credit default swaps, these customized credit default swaps contain a feature that permits the securitization entity to provide the par value of underlying assets in the securitization entity to settle any losses under the credit default swap. The valuation of this settlement feature is dependent upon the valuation of the underlying assets and the timing and amount of any expected loss on the credit default swap, which is considered a significant unobservable input. Accordingly, these customized index tranche credit default swaps related to securitization entities are classified as Level 3. As credit spreads widen for the underlying issuers comprising the customized index, the change in our valuation of these credit default swaps will be unfavorable.

Equity index options. We have equity index options associated with various equity indices. The valuation of equity index options is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent forward interest rate volatility and time value component associated with the optionality in the derivative, which are considered significant unobservable inputs in most instances. The equity index volatility surface is determined based on market information that is not readily observable and is developed based upon inputs received from several third-party sources. Accordingly, these options are classified as Level 3. As equity index volatility increases, our valuation of these options changes favorably.

Financial futures. The fair value of financial futures is based on the closing exchange prices. Accordingly, these financial futures are classified as Level 1. The period end valuation is zero as a result of settling the margins on these contracts on a daily basis.

Equity return swaps.The valuation of equity return swaps is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve and underlying equity index values, which are generally considered observable inputs, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Forward bond purchase commitments.The valuation of forward bond purchase commitments is determined using an income approach. The primary input into the valuation represents the current bond prices and interest rates, which are generally considered an observable input, and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

Other foreign currency contracts.We have certain foreign currency options classified as other foreign currency contracts. The valuation of foreign currency options is determined using an income approach. The

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward interest rate swap curve, foreign currency exchange rates, forward interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate volatility, foreign equity index volatility and time value component associated with the optionality in the derivative. As a result of the significant unobservable inputs associated with the forward interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate volatility and foreign equity index volatility inputs, the derivative is classified as Level 3. As foreign currency exchange rate volatility and foreign equity index volatility increases, the change in our valuation of these options will be favorable. We also have foreign currency forward contracts where the valuation is determined using an income approach. The primary inputs into the valuation represent the forward foreign currency exchange rates, which are generally considered observable inputs and results in the derivative being classified as Level 2.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Reinsurance embedded derivatives

We have certain reinsurance agreements that result in a reinsurance counterparty holding assets for our benefit where this feature is considered an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. As a result, we measure the embedded derivatives at fair value with changes in fair value being recorded in income (loss). Fair value is determined by comparing the fair value and cost basis of the underlying assets. The underlying assets are primarily comprised of highly rated investments and result in the fair value of the embedded derivatives being classified as Level 2.

GMWB embedded derivatives

We are required to bifurcate an embedded derivative for certain features associated with annuity products and related reinsurance agreements where we provide a GMWB to the policyholder and are required to record the GMWB embedded derivative at fair value. The valuation of our GMWB embedded derivative is based on an income approach that incorporates inputs such as forward interest rates, equity index volatility, equity index and fund correlation, and policyholder assumptions such as utilization, lapse and mortality. In addition to these inputs, we also consider risk and expense margins when determining the projected cash flows that would be determined by another market participant. While the risk and expense margins are considered in determining fair value, these inputs do not have a significant impact on the valuation. We determine fair value using an internal model based on the various inputs noted above. The resulting fair value measurement from the model is reviewed by the product actuarial, risk and finance professionals each reporting period with changes in fair value also being compared to changes in derivatives and other instruments used to mitigate changes in fair value from certain market risks, such as equity index volatility and interest rates.

For GMWB liabilities, non-performance risk is integrated into the discount rate. ~~Prior to the third quarter of 2010, the~~Our discount rate ~~was based on the swap curve, which incorporated the non-performance risk~~used to determine fair value of our GMWB liabilities. Beginning in 2009, the swap curve dropped below the U.S. Treasury curve at certain points on the longer end of the curve, and in 2010, the points below the U.S. Treasury curve expanded to several points beyond 10 years. For these points on the curve, we utilized the U.S. Treasury curve as our discount rate through the second quarter of 2010. Beginning in the third quarter of 2010, we revised our discount rate to reflectliabilities includes market credit spreads ~~that represent~~above U.S. Treasury rates to reflect an adjustment for the non-performance risk of the GMWB liabilities. ~~The credit spreads included in our discount rate range from 60 to 80 basis points over the most relevant points on the U.S. Treasury curve.~~ As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the impact of non-performance risk resulted in a lower fair value of our GMWB liabilities of ~~$44 million.~~$77 million and $109 million, respectively.

To determine the appropriate discount rate to reflect the non-performance risk of the GMWB liabilities, we evaluate the non-performance risk in our liabilities based on a hypothetical exit market transaction as there is no exit market for these types of liabilities. A hypothetical exit market can be viewed as a hypothetical transfer of the liability to another similarly rated insurance company which would closely resemble a reinsurance transaction. Another hypothetical exit market transaction can be viewed as a hypothetical transaction from the perspective of the GMWB policyholder. In determining the appropriate discount rate to incorporate non-performance risk of the GMWB liabilities, we also considered the impacts of state guarantees embedded in

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

the related insurance product as a form of inseparable third-party guarantee. We believe that a hypothetical exit market participant would use a similar discount rate as described above to value the liabilities.

For equity index volatility, we determine the projected equity market volatility using both historical volatility and projected near-term equity market volatility with more significance being placed on projected and recent historical data.

Equity index and fund correlations are determined based on historical price observations for the fund and equity index.

For policyholder assumptions, we use our expected lapse, mortality and utilization assumptions and update these assumptions for our actual experience, as necessary. For our lapse assumption, we adjust our base lapse assumption by policy based on a combination of the policyholder’s current account value and GMWB benefit.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

We classify the GMWB valuation as Level 3 based on having significant unobservable inputs, with equity index volatility and non-performance risk being considered the more significant unobservable inputs. As equity index volatility increases, the fair value of the GMWB liabilities will increase. Any increase in non-performance risk would increase the discount rate and would decrease the fair value of the GMWB liability.

We evaluate the inputs and methodologies used to determine fair value based on how we expect a market participant would determine exit value. As stated above, there is no exit market or market participants for the GMWB embedded derivatives. Accordingly, we evaluate our inputs and resulting fair value based on a hypothetical exit market and hypothetical market participants. A hypothetical exit market could be viewed as a transaction that would closely resemble reinsurance. While reinsurance transactions for this type of product are not an observable input, we consider this type of hypothetical exit market, as appropriate, when evaluating our inputs and determining that our inputs are consistent with that of a hypothetical market participant.

Contingent purchase price

We have certain contingent purchase price payments related to acquisitions made after 2009 that are required to be recorded at fair value each period. Fair value is determined using an income approach whereby we project the expected earnings of the business and compare our projections of the relevant earnings metric to the thresholds established in the purchase agreement to determine our expected payments. We then discount these expected payments to calculate the fair value as of the valuation date. We evaluate the underlying projections used in determining fair value each period and update these underlying projections when there have been significant changes in our expectations of the future business performance. The inputs used to determine the discount rate and expected payments are primarily based on significant unobservable inputs and result in the fair value of the contingent purchase price being classified as Level 3.

Borrowings related to securitization entities

We record certain borrowings related to securitization entities at fair value. The fair value of these borrowings is determined using either a market approach or income approach, depending on the instrument and availability of market information. Given the unique characteristics of the securitization entities that issued these borrowings as well as the lack of comparable instruments, we determine fair value considering the valuation of the underlying assets held by the securitization entities and any derivatives, as well as any unique characteristics of the borrowings that may impact the valuation. After considering all relevant inputs, we determine fair value of the borrowings using the net valuation of the underlying assets and derivatives that are backing the borrowings. Accordingly, these instruments are classified as Level 3. Increases in the valuation of the underlying assets or decreases in the derivative liabilities will result in an increase in the fair value of these borrowings.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables set forth our assets and liabilities by class of instrument that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011											March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3,682		$	—	$	3,669		$	13
U.S. government, agencies and government- sponsored enterprises												$	4,574	$	—	$	4,573	$	1
Tax-exempt		865			—		865			—			341		—		341		—
Government—non-U.S.		2,389			—		2,388			1			2,291		—		2,282		9
U.S. corporate		24,047			—		23,098			949			25,207		—		22,777		2,430
Corporate—non-U.S.		14,428			—		14,057			371			14,442		—		12,833		1,609
Residential mortgage-backed		4,983			—		4,859			124			5,852		—		5,757		95
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,721			—		3,678			43			3,346		—		3,306		40
Other asset-backed		2,106			—		1,841			265			2,479		—		2,060		419

Total fixed maturity securities		56,221			—		54,455			1,766			58,532		—		53,929		4,603

Equity securities		374			260		8			106			434		337		2		95

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		607			—		316			291			770		—		484		286
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		719			—		715			4			795		—		791		4
Foreign currency swaps		46			—		46			—			37		—		37		—
Credit default swaps		9			—		5			4			4		—		1		3
Equity index options		40			—		—			40			18		—		—		18
Equity return swaps		6			—		6			—			1		—		1		—
Forward bond purchase commitments													3		—		3		—
Other foreign currency contracts													2		—		—		2

Total derivative assets		820			—		772			48			860		—		833		27

Securities lending collateral		554			—		554			—			93		—		93		—
Derivatives counterparty collateral		522			—		522			—			112		—		112		—

Total other invested assets		2,503			—		2,164			339			1,835		—		1,522		313

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		378			—		203			175			383		—		202		181
Other assets⁽¹⁾		(1	)		—		(1	)		—			17		—		17		—
Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾		(5	)		—		—			(5	)		6		—		—		6
Separate account assets		11,452			11,452		—			—			10,646		10,646		—		—

Total assets	$	70,922		$	11,712	$	56,829		$	2,381		$	71,853	$	10,983	$	55,672	$	5,198


Liabilities
Policyholder account balances⁽³⁾	$	113		$	—	$	—		$	113		$	287	$	—	$	—	$	287
Other liabilities:
Contingent purchase price													30		—		—		30
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaps		87			—		87			—			375		—		375		—
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		18			—		18			—			25		—		25		—
Inflation indexed swaps		61			—		61			—			74		—		74		—
Credit default swaps		9			—		—			9			24		—		1		23
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		126			—		—			126			147		—		—		147
Equity return swaps		1			—		1			—			6		—		6		—
Forward bond purchase commitments													4		—		4		—
Other foreign currency contracts		12			—		12			—			18		—		18		—

Total derivative liabilities		314			—		179			135			673		—		503		170

Total other liabilities													703		—		503		200

Borrowings related to securitization entities		58			—		—			58			55		—		—		55

Total liabilities	$	485		$	—	$	179		$	306		$	1,045	$	—	$	503	$	542

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with certain reinsurance agreements.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

⁽³⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2010										December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Total			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3,705		$	—	$	3,694	$	11
U.S. government, agencies and government- sponsored enterprises											$	4,863	$	—	$	4,850	$	13
Tax-exempt		1,030			—		1,030		—			503		—		503		—
Government—non-U.S.		2,369			—		2,368		1			2,211		—		2,201		10
U.S. corporate		23,967			—		22,867		1,100			25,258		—		22,747		2,511
Corporate—non-U.S.		13,498			—		13,130		368			13,757		—		12,473		1,284
Residential mortgage-backed		4,455			—		4,312		143			5,695		—		5,600		95
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,743			—		3,693		50			3,400		—		3,361		39
Other asset-backed		2,416			—		2,148		268			2,608		—		2,337		271

Total fixed maturity securities		55,183			—		53,242		1,941			58,295		—		54,072		4,223

Equity securities		332			240		5		87			361		261		2		98

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		677			—		348		329			788		—		524		264
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		763			—		758		5			1,350		—		1,345		5
Foreign currency swaps		240			—		240		—			32		—		32		—
Credit default swaps		11			—		5		6			1		—		1		—
Equity index options		33			—		—		33			39		—		—		39
Equity return swaps												7		—		7		—
Forward bond purchase commitments												47		—		47		—
Other foreign currency contracts												9		—		—		9

Total derivative assets		1,047			—		1,003		44			1,485		—		1,432		53

Securities lending collateral		772			—		772		—			406		—		406		—
Derivatives counterparty collateral		630			—		630		—			323		—		323		—

Total other invested assets		3,126			—		2,753		373			3,002		—		2,685		317

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		370			—		199		171			376		—		200		176
Other assets⁽¹⁾		1			—		1		—			29		—		29		—
Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾		(5	)		—		—		(5	)		16		—		—		16
Separate account assets		11,666			11,666		—		—			10,122		10,122		—		—

Total assets	$	70,673		$	11,906	$	56,200	$	2,567		$	72,201	$	10,383	$	56,988	$	4,830

Liabilities
Policyholder account balances⁽³⁾	$	121		$	—	$	—	$	121		$	492	$	—	$	—	$	492
Other liabilities:
Contingent purchase price												46		—		—		46
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaps		138			—		138		—			376		—		376		—
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		19			—		19		—			28		—		28		—
Inflation indexed swaps		33			—		33		—			43		—		43		—
Credit default swaps		7			—		—		7			59		—		2		57
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		129			—		—		129			177		—		—		177
Equity index options		3			—		—		3
Equity return swaps		3			—		3		—			4		—		4		—
Other foreign currency contracts												11		—		11		—

Total derivative liabilities		332			—		193		139			698		—		464		234

Total other liabilities												744		—		464		280

Borrowings related to securitization entities		51			—		—		51			48		—		—		48

Total liabilities	$	504		$	—	$	193	$	311		$	1,284	$	—	$	464	$	820

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with certain reinsurance agreements.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

⁽³⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

We review the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers ~~in and out of Level 3, or~~ between ~~other~~ levels at the beginning fair value for the reporting period in which the changes occur. Given the types of assets classified as Level 1, which primarily represents mutual fund investments, we typically do not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 measurement categories and did not have any such transfers during any period presented.

Our assessment of whether or not there were significant unobservable inputs related to fixed maturity securities was based on our observations obtained through the course of managing our investment portfolio, including interaction with other market participants, observations related to the availability and consistency of pricing and/or rating, and understanding of general market activity such as new issuance and the level of secondary market trading for a class of securities. Additionally, we considered data obtained from third-party pricing sources to determine whether our estimated values incorporate significant unobservable inputs that would result in the valuation being classified as Level 3.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value as of or for the dates indicated:


	Beginning balance as of April 1, 2011				Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)							Purchases		Sales			Issuances			Settlements			Transfer in Level 3			Transfer out of Level 3				Ending balance as of June 30, 2011			Total gains (losses) included in net income (loss) attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)				Included in net income (loss)				Included in OCI									Issuances		Beginning balance as of January 1, 2012				Transfer in Level 3			Transfer out of Level 3			Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)								Purchases		Sales			Issuances			Settlements				Transfer into Level 3				Transfer out of Level 3			Ending balance as of March 31, 2012			Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)
																																						Included in net income						Included in OCI
	Beginning balance as of April 1, 2011											Purchases		Sales
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	1			$	—			$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—				$	—		$	12			$	Ending balance as of June 30, 2011	—		$	13		$	—
U.S. government, agencies and government- sponsored enterprises																																				$	13	$		—		$	—			$	—				$	—		$	—				$	—		$	—		$	(12	)		$	1	$	—
Government—non-U.S.		1				—				—			—		—			—					—			—				—			1			—		10			—			—				—					—			—			(1	)		—			—				9		—
U.S. corporate⁽¹⁾		715				4				9			27		(5	)		—			(18	)		236			(19	)			949			4			2,511		1			11			30				(18	)			—			(10	)		149			(244	)		2,430				4
Corporate—non-U.S. ⁽¹⁾		202				1				—			15		(10	)		—			(2	)		165			—				371			1			1,284		2			13			59				—				—			(28	)		353			(74	)		1,609				1
Residential mortgage-backed		135				—				(10	)		3		—			—			(4	)		—			—				124			—
Commercial mortgage-backed		42				—				2			—		—			—			(1	)		—			—				43			—
Residential mortgage- backed																																					95		—			3			—				—				—			(5	)		2			—			95				—
Commercial mortgage- backed																																					39		—			2			—				—				—			(1	)		—			—			40				—
Other asset-backed		263				—				7			—		—			—			(5	)		—			—				265			—			271		—			7			70				(20	)			—			(13	)		104			—			419				—

Total fixed maturity securities		1,359				5				8			45		(15	)		—			(30	)		413			(19	)			1,766			5			4,223		3			36			159				(38	)			—			(58	)		608			(330	)		4,603				5

Equity securities		87				—				—			24		(5	)		—			—			—			—				106			—			98		1			(2	)		—				(2	)			—			—			—			—			95				—

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		338				7				—			—		(41	)		—			(13	)		—			—				291			7			264		5			—			24				—				—			(7	)		—			—			286				5
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		3				1				—			—		—			—			—			—			—				4			1			5		—			—			—				—				—			(1	)		—			—			4				—
Credit default swaps		6				(2	)			—			—		—			—			—			—			—				4			(2	)		—		4			—			—				—				—			(1	)		—			—			3				4
Equity index options		32				(8	)			—			15		—			—			1			—			—				40			(8	)		39		(35	)		—			14				—				—			—			—			—			18				(31	)
Other foreign currency contracts																																					9		(10	)		—			3				—				—			—			—			—			2				(10	)

Total derivative assets		41				(9	)			—			15		—			—			1			—			—				48			(9	)		53		(41	)		—			17				—				—			(2	)		—			—			27				(37	)

Total other invested assets		379				(2	)			—			15		(41	)		—			(12	)		—			—				339			(2	)		317		(36	)		—			41				—				—			(9	)		—			—			313				(32	)

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		175				—				—			—		—			—			—			—			—				175			—			176		5			—			—				—				—			—			—			—			181				5
Reinsurance recoverable ⁽²⁾		(7	)			1				—			—		—			1			—			—			—				(5	)		1			16		(11	)		—			—				—				1			—			—			—			6				(11	)

Total Level 3 assets	$	1,993			$	4			$	8		$	84	$	(61	)	$	1		$	(42	)	$	413		$	(19	)		$	2,381		$	4		$	4,830	$	(38	)	$	34		$	200			$	(40	)		$	1		$	(67	)	$	608		$	(330	)	$	5,198			$	(33	)

⁽¹⁾

The transfers ininto and out of Level 3 were primarily related to private fixed rate U.S. corporate and corporate—non-U.S. securities and resulted from a change in the observability of the additional premium to the public bond spread to adjust for the liquidity and other features of our private placements and resulted in unobservable inputs having a significant impact on certain valuations for transfers in or no longer having significant impact on certain valuations for transfers out.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in millions)
Beginning
balance
as of
April 1,
2010 Total realized and
unrealized gains
(losses) Purchases,
sales,
issuances
and
settlements,
net Transfer
in Level 3⁽¹⁾ Transfer
out of
Level 3 Ending
balance
as of
June 30,
2010 Total gains
(losses)
included in
net income
(loss)
attributable
to assets
still held
Included in
net income
(loss) Included
in OCI
Fixed maturity securities:

U.S. government, agencies and government- sponsored enterprises
$ 8    $ —      $ —      $ (1 ) $ 6    $ (4 ) $ 9    $ —
Tax-exempt
2    —      —      —      —      (2 ) —      —
Government—non-U.S.
1    —      1    —      16    —      18    —
U.S. corporate
906    11    19    (29 ) 653    (40 ) 1,520    4
Corporate—non-U.S.
508    —      7    2    294    (91 ) 720    —
Residential mortgage- backed
171    —      —      (26 ) 1    (84 ) 62    —
Commercial mortgage- backed
47    —      10    (1 ) 11    (8 ) 59    —
Other asset-backed
409    (8 ) 2    (14 ) —      (28 ) 361    (8 )

Total fixed maturity securities
2,052    3    39    (69 ) 981    (257 ) 2,749    (4 )

Equity securities
67    —      1    1    —      (60 ) 9    —

Other invested assets:

Trading securities
142    (7 ) —      1    —      —      136    (7 )
Derivative assets:

Interest rate swaps
4    5    —      —      —      —      9    5
Interest rate swaptions
14    24    —      (34 ) —      —      4    24
Credit default swaps
7    (7 ) —      —      —      —      —      (7 )
Equity index options
34    46    —      17    —      —      97    46
Other foreign currency contracts
4    (3 ) —      —      —      —      1    (3 )

Total derivative assets
63    65    —      (17 ) —      —      111    65

Total other invested assets
205    58    —      (16 ) —      —      247    58

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities
174    (2 ) 2    —      —      —      174    (2 )
Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾
(6 ) 15    —      —      —      —      9    15

Total Level 3 assets
$ 2,492    $ 74    $ 42    $ (84 ) $ 981    $ (317 ) $ 3,188    $ 67

⁽¹⁾

The transfer into Level 3 was primarily related to private fixed U.S. corporate and corporate—non-U.S. securities and resulted from a change in the observability of the additional premium to the public bond spread to adjust for the liquidity and other features of our private placements and resulted in unobservable inputs having a significant impact on certain valuations.

⁽²⁾	~~Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.~~

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011				Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)							Purchases		Sales			Issuances			Settlements			Transfer in Level 3			Transfer out of Level 3				Ending balance as of June 30, 2011			Total gains (losses) included in net income (loss) attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)				Included in net income (loss)				Included in OCI									Issuances		Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011				Transfer in Level 3			Transfer out of Level 3			Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)								Purchases			Sales			Issuances			Settlements			Transfer into Level 3				Transfer out of Level 3				Ending balance as of March 31, 2011				Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)																																					Purchases		Included in net income						Included in OCI												Ending balance as of March 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011											Purchases		Sales																										Sales			Issuances										Transfer out of Level 3
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	11			$	—			$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011			$	—		$	12			$	Ending balance as of June 30, 2011	(10	)	$	13		$	—
U.S. government, agencies and government- sponsored enterprises																																				$	11		$	—		$	—		$	Settlements	—		Transfer into Level 3	$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	(10	)		$	1			$	—
Government—non-U.S.		1				—				—			—		—			—			—			—			—				1			—			1			—			—			—			—				—				—				—				—				1				—
U.S. corporate⁽¹⁾		1,100				8				6			30		(5	)		—			(63	)		252			(379	)			949			8			1,100			4			(3	)		3			—				—				(45	)			16				(360	)			715				4
Corporate—non-U.S. ⁽¹⁾		368				(11	)			(3	)		40		(35	)		—			(7	)		205			(186	)			371			(10	)		368			(12	)		(3	)		25			(25	)			—				(5	)			40				(186	)			202				(11	)
Residential mortgage-backed		143				(1	)			(8	)		3		—			—			(12	)		—			(1	)			124			(1	)
Commercial mortgage-backed		50				—				2			—		—			—			(9	)		—			—				43			—
Residential mortgage- backed																																					143			(1	)		2			—			—				—				(8	)			—				(1	)			135				(1	)
Commercial mortgage- backed																																					50			—			—			—			—				—				(8	)			—				—				42				—
Other asset-backed		268				(1	)			9			8		(8	)		—			(26	)		15			—				265			(1	)		268			(1	)		2			8			(8	)			—				(21	)			15				—				263				(1	)

Total fixed maturity securities		1,941				(5	)			6			81		(48	)		—			(117	)		484			(576	)			1,766			(4	)		1,941			(10	)		(2	)		36			(33	)			—				(87	)			71				(557	)			1,359				(9	)

Equity securities		87				1				1			24		(5	)		—			(2	)		—			—				106			—			87			1			1			—			—				—				(2	)			—				—				87				—

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		329				16				—			5		(41	)		—			(18	)		—			—				291			16			329			9			—			5			—				—				(5	)			—				—				338				9
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		5				(1	)			—			—		—			—			—			—			—				4			(1	)		5			(2	)		—			—			—				—				—				—				—				3				(2	)
Credit default swaps		6				(2	)			—			—		—			—			—			—			—				4			(2	)		6			—			—			—			—				—				—				—				—				6				—
Equity index options		33				(27	)			—			39		—			—			(5	)		—			—				40			(27	)		33			(19	)		—			24			—				—				(6	)			—				—				32				(19	)

Total derivative assets		44				(30	)			—			39		—			—			(5	)		—			—				48			(30	)		44			(21	)		—			24			—				—				(6	)			—				—				41				(21	)

Total other invested assets		373				(14	)			—			44		(41	)		—			(23	)		—			—				339			(14	)		373			(12	)		—			29			—				—				(11	)			—				—				379				(12	)

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		171				4				—			—		—			—			—			—			—				175			4			171			4			—			—			—				—				—				—				—				175				4
Reinsurance recoverable ⁽²⁾		(5	)			(2	)			—			—		—			2			—			—			—				(5	)		(2	)		(5	)		(3	)		—			—			—				1				—				—				—				(7	)			(3	)

Total Level 3 assets	$	2,567			$	(16	)		$	7		$	149	$	(94	)	$	2		$	(142	)	$	484		$	(576	)		$	2,381		$	(16	)	$	2,567		$	(20	)	$	(1	)	$	65		$	(33	)		$	1			$	(100	)		$	71			$	(557	)		$	1,993			$	(20	)

⁽¹⁾

The transfers ininto and out of Level 3 were primarily related to private fixed rate U.S. ~~corporate~~ and ~~corporate—~~non-U.S. corporate securities and resulted from a change in the observability of the additional premium to the public bond spread to adjust for the liquidity and other features of our private placements and resulted in unobservable inputs having a significant impact on certain valuations for transfers in or no longer having significant impact on certain valuations for transfers out.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Beginning
balance
as of
January 1,
2010 Total realized and
unrealized gains
(losses) Purchases,
sales,
issuances
and
settlements,
net Transfer
in Level 3 Transfer
out of
Level 3 ⁽¹⁾ Ending
balance
as of
June 30,
2010 Total gains
(losses)
included in
net income
(loss)
attributable
to assets
still held
(Amounts in millions)
Included in
net income
(loss) Included
in OCI
Fixed maturity securities:

U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises
$ 16    $ —      $ —      $ (2 ) $ 9    $ (14 ) $ 9    $ —
Tax-exempt
2    —      —      —      —      (2 ) —      —
Government—non-U.S.
7    —      1    —      16    (6 ) 18    —
U.S. corporate
1,073    11    34    31    678    (307 ) 1,520    8
Corporate—non-U.S.
504    1    8    11    353    (157 ) 720    1
Residential mortgage- backed
1,481    —      3    80    1    (1,503 ) 62    —
Commercial mortgage- backed
3,558    1    14    (63 ) 11    (3,462 ) 59    —
Other asset-backed
1,419    (24 ) 23    (18 ) 10    (1,049 ) 361    (24 )

Total fixed maturity securities
8,060    (11 ) 83    39    1,078    (6,500 ) 2,749    (15 )

Equity securities
9    —      —      8    52    (60 ) 9    —

Other invested assets:

Trading securities
145    1    —      (10 ) —      —      136    1
Derivative assets:

Interest rate swaps
3    6    —      —      —      —      9    6
Interest rate swaptions
54    15    —      (65 ) —      —      4    15
Credit default swaps
6    (6 ) —      —      —      —      —      (6 )
Equity index options
39    22    —      36    —      —      97    22
Other foreign currency contracts
8    (7 ) —      —      —      —      1    (7 )

Total derivative assets
110    30    —      (29 ) —      —      111    30

Total other invested assets
255    31    —      (39 ) —      —      247    31

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities
—      (2 ) 2    —      174    —      174    (2 )
Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾
(5 ) 14    —      —      —      —      9    14

Total Level 3 assets
$ 8,319    $ 32    $ 85    $ 8    $ 1,304    $ (6,560 ) $ 3,188    $ 28

⁽¹⁾

During 2010, primary market issuance and secondary market activity for commercial and non-agency residential mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities increased the market observable inputs used to establish fair values for similar securities. These factors, along with more consistent pricing from third-party sources, resulted in our conclusion that there is sufficient trading activity in similar instruments to support classifying certain mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities as Level 2.

⁽²⁾	~~Represents embedded derivatives associated with the reinsured portion of our GMWB liabilities.~~

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The following table presents the gains and losses included in net income from assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value and the related income statement line item in which these gains and losses were presented for the three months ended March 31:


	Net investment income				Net investment gains (losses)						Total
(Amounts in millions)	2012		2011		2012			2011			2012			2011
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in net income	$	16	$	17	$	(54	)	$	(37	)	$	(38	)	$	(20	)
Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to assets still held		15		17		(48	)		(37	)		(33	)		(20	)

The following tables present additional information about liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value as of or for the dates indicated:

Beginning
balance
as of
April 1,
2011 Total realized and
unrealized (gains)
losses Settlements Transfer
in Level 3 Transfer
out of
Level 3 Ending
balance
as of
June 30,
2011 Total (gains)
losses
included in
net (income)
loss
attributable
to liabilities
still held
(Amounts in millions)
Included in
net (income)
loss Included
in OCI Purchases Sales Issuances
Policyholder account balances⁽¹⁾
$ 69    $ 34    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 10    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 113    $ 34
Derivative liabilities:

Credit default swaps
7    2    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      9    2
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities
120    6    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      126    6

Total derivative liabilities
127    8    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      135    8

Borrowings related to securitization entities
58    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —      58    —

Total Level 3 liabilities
$ 254    $ 42    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 10    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 306    $ 42

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.~~


	Beginning balance as of April 1, 2010				Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses							Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net			Transfer in Level 3			Transfer out of Level 3			Ending balance as of June 30, 2010			Total (gains) losses included in net (income) loss attributable to liabilities still held
(Amounts in millions)				Included in net (income) loss				Included in OCI							Transfer in Level 3		Beginning balance as of January 1, 2012				Ending balance as of June 30, 2010						Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses							Purchases			Sales				Issuances				Settlements				Transfer into Level 3				Transfer out of Level 3				Ending balance as of March 31, 2012				Total (gains) losses included in net (income) attributable to liabilities still held
(Amounts in millions)																													Included in net (income)			Included in OCI		Purchases											Settlements				Transfer into Level 3				Transfer out of Level 3				Ending balance as of March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of April 1, 2010	$	145			$	294			$	—	Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net			$	8	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2012			$	—		$	—			$	447		$	294			$	492		Sales			$	Issuances			(214	)		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	9			$	—		$	—	$	—	$	287	$	(210	)
Other liabilities:
Contingent purchase price																													46			2				—			—				—				—				(18	)			—				—				30			2
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaptions		18				(10	)			—			(8	)		—			—			—			(10	)
Credit default swaps		1				25				—			—			—			—			26			25				57			(36	)			—			2				—				—				—				—				—				23			(36	)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		118				46				—			(5	)		—			—			159			46				177			(31	)			—			1				—				—				—				—				—				147			(31	)
Equity index options		4				(3	)			—			(1	)		—			—			—			(3	)

Total derivative liabilities		141				58				—			(14	)		—			—			185			58				234			(67	)			—			3				—				—				—				—				—				170			(67	)

Total other liabilities																													280			(65	)			—			3				—				—				(18	)			—				—				200			(65	)

Borrowings related to securitization entities		58				(7	)			—			—			—			—			51			(6	)			48			7				—			—				—				—				—				—				—				55			7

Total Level 3 liabilities	$	344			$	345			$	—		$	(6	)	$	—		$	—		$	683		$	346			$	820		$	(272	)		$	—		$	3			$	—			$	9			$	(18	)		$	—			$	—			$	542		$	(268	)

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


(Amounts in millions	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011		Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses					Purchases		Sales		Issuances		Settlements			Transfer into Level 3		Transfer out of Level 3		Ending balance as of March 31, 2011		Total (gains) losses included in net (income) attributable to liabilities still held
(Amounts in millions	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2011		Included in net (income)			Included in OCI		Purchases		Sales		Issuances		Settlements			Transfer into Level 3		Transfer out of Level 3		Ending balance as of March 31, 2011
Policyholder account balances ⁽¹⁾	$	121	$	(62	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	10	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	69	$	(61	)
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps		7		(2	)		—		3		—		—		(1	)		—		—		7		(2	)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		129		(9	)		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		120		(9	)
Equity index options		3		—			—		—		—		—		(3	)		—		—		—		—

Total derivative liabilities		139		(11	)		—		3		—		—		(4	)		—		—		127		(11	)

Borrowings related to securitization entities		51		7			—		—		—		—		—			—		—		58		7

Total Level 3 liabilities	$	311	$	(66	)	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	10	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—	$	254	$	(65	)

⁽¹⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

The following ~~tables present additional information about~~table presents the gains and losses included in net (income) from liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which we have utilized significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs to determine fair value ~~as of or~~and the related income statement line item in which these gains and losses were presented for the ~~dates indicated:~~three months ended March 31:

Beginning
balance
as of
January 1,
2011 Total realized and
unrealized (gains)
losses Settlements Transfer
in Level 3 Transfer
out of
Level 3 Ending
balance
as of
June 30,
2011 Total (gains)
losses
included in
net (income)
loss
attributable
to liabilities
still held
(Amounts in millions)
Included in
net (income)
loss Included
in OCI Purchases Sales Issuances
Policyholder account balances⁽¹⁾
$ 121    $ (28 ) $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 20    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 113    $ (27 )
Derivative liabilities:

Credit default swaps
7    —      —      3    —      —      (1 ) —      —      9    —
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities
129    (3 ) —      —      —      —      —      —      —      126    (3 )
Equity index options
3    —      —      —      —      —      (3 ) —      —      —      —

Total derivative liabilities
139    (3 ) —      3    —      —      (4 ) —      —      135    (3 )

Borrowings related to securitization entities
51    7    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      58    7

Total Level 3 liabilities
$ 311    $ (24 ) $ —      $ 3    $ —      $ 20    $ (4 ) $ —      $ —      $ 306    $ (23 )

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.~~

Beginning
balance
as of
January 1,
2010 Total realized and
unrealized (gains)
losses Purchases,
sales,
issuances
and
settlements,
net Transfer
in Level 3 Transfer
out of
Level 3 Ending
balance
as of
June 30,
2010 Total (gains)
losses
included in
net (income)
loss
attributable
to liabilities
still held
(Amounts in millions)
Included in
net (income)
loss Included
in OCI
Policyholder account balances⁽¹⁾
$ 175    $ 255    $ —      $ 17    $ —      $ —      $ 447    $ 255
Derivative liabilities:

Interest rate swaps
2    (2 ) —      —      —      —      —      (2 )
Interest rate swaptions
67    (42 ) —      (25 ) —      —      —      (42 )
Credit default swaps
—      26    —      —      —      —      26    26
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities
—      41    —      (3 ) 121    —      159    41
Equity index options
2    (1 ) —      (1 ) —      —      —      (1 )

Total derivative liabilities
71    22    —      (29 ) 121    —      185    22

Borrowings related to securitization entities
—      (8 ) —      —      59    —      51    (8 )

Total Level 3 liabilities
$ 246    $ 269    $ —      $ (12 ) $ 180    $ —      $ 683    $ 269

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.~~


(Amounts in millions)	Net investment income				Net investment (gains) losses						Total
(Amounts in millions)	2012		2011		2012			2011			2012			2011
Total realized and unrealized (gains) losses included in net (income)	$	—	$	—	$	(272	)	$	(66	)	$	(272	)	$	(66	)
Total (gains) losses included in net (income) attributable to liabilities still held		—		—		(268	)		(65	)		(268	)		(65	)

Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on Level 3 assets and liabilities are primarily reported in either net investment gains (losses) within the consolidated statements of income or OCI within stockholders’ equity based on the appropriate accounting treatment for the instrument.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements represent the activity that occurred during the period that results in a change of the asset or liability but does not represent changes in fair value for the instruments held at the beginning of the period. Such activity primarily consists of purchases, sales and settlements of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities and purchases, issuances and settlements of derivative instruments.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Issuances and settlements presented for policyholder account balances represent the issuances and settlements of embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities where: issuances are characterized as the change in fair value associated with the product fees recognized that are attributed to the embedded derivative to equal the expected future benefit costs upon issuance and settlements are characterized as the change in fair value upon exercising the embedded derivative instrument, effectively representing a settlement of the embedded derivative instrument. We have shown these changes in fair value separately based on the classification of this activity as effectively issuing and settling the embedded derivative instrument with all remaining changes in the fair value of these embedded derivative instruments being shown separately in the category labeled “included in net (income) ~~loss”~~” in the tables presented above.

The amount presented for unrealized gains (losses) ~~for assets and liabilities still held as of the reporting date primarily represents impairments~~included in net income for available-for-sale securities changes in fair value of trading securities and certain derivatives and changes in fair value of embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities that existed as of the reporting date, which were recorded in net investment gains (losses),represents impairments and accretion on certain fixed maturity ~~securities which was recorded~~securities.

Certain classes of instruments classified as Level 3 are excluded below as a result of not being material or due to limitations in ~~net investment income.~~being able to obtain the underlying inputs used by certain third-party sources, such as broker quotes, used as an input in determining fair value. The following table presents a summary of the significant unobservable inputs used for certain fair value measurements that are based on internal models and classified as Level 3 as of March 31, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	Fair value		Unobservable input	Range (weighted-average)
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. corporate	$	2,174	Credit spreads	60bps -1,090bps (242bps)
Corporate—non-U.S.		1,530	Credit spreads	109bps - 354bps (217bps)
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		4	Interest rate volatility	22% - 32% (26%)
Credit default swaps ⁽¹⁾		3	Credit spreads	48bps - 92bps (73bps)
Equity index options		18	Equity index volatility	16% - 28% (22%)
Other foreign currency contracts		2	Equity index volatility	20% - 29% (25%)
Liabilities:
Policyholder account balances ⁽²⁾		287	Non-performance risk (credit spreads) Equity index volatility	50bps - 85bps 18% - 26%
Other liabilities:
Contingent purchase price		30	Discount rate	23%
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps ⁽¹⁾		23	Credit spreads	200bps - 262bps (231bps)

⁽¹⁾	Unobservable input valuation based on the current market credit default swap premium.

⁽²⁾	Represents embedded derivatives associated with our GMWB liabilities, excluding the impact of reinsurance.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(7) Commitments and Contingencies

(a) Litigation

We face the risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance operations, we are, have been, or may become subject to class actions and individual suits alleging, among other things, issues relating to sales or underwriting practices, increases to in-force long-term care insurance premiums, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, bidding practices in connection with our management and administration of a third-party’s municipal guaranteed investment contract business, claims payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, administration, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, recommending unsuitable products to customers, our pricing structures and business practices in our mortgage insurance businesses, such as captive reinsurance arrangements with lenders and contract underwriting services, violations of the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”) or related state anti-inducement laws, and breaching fiduciary or other duties to customers. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In our investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving commercial disputes with counterparties. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities such as our contractual and employment relationships. In addition, we are also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas, books and record examinations and market conduct and financial examinations from state, federal and international regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. At this time, it is not feasible to predict, nor determine the ultimate outcomes of any pending investigations and legal proceedings, nor to provide reasonable ranges of possible losses.

As previously disclosed, in December 2011, one of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries received a subpoena from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Inspector General with respect to reinsurance arrangements, including captive reinsurance transactions. That subpoena was withdrawn subsequent to our subsidiary’s receipt of an information request from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in January 2012, relating to the same subject matter.

As previously disclosed, in December 2011 and January 2012, one of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries was named along with several other mortgage insurance participants and mortgage lenders as a defendant in three putative class action lawsuits alleging that certain “captive reinsurance arrangements” were in violation of RESPA. Four additional putative class actions, making similar allegations, have since been filed in which our mortgage insurance subsidiary is again named as one of numerous defendants. Those cases are captioned as follows:McCarn, et al. v. HSB, et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of California;Manners, et al, v. First Third Bank, et al., United States District court for the Western District of Pennsylvania;Riddle, et al. v Bank of America, et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; andRulison et al. v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. We intend to vigorously defend these actions.

In April 2012, two of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries were named as respondents in two arbitrations, one brought by Bank of America, N.A., and one brought by Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as claimants. Claimants allege breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~On June 22, 2011, we received~~faith and fair dealing, and seek a ~~subpoena from the office of the New York Attorney General,~~declaratory judgment relating to ~~an industry-wide investigation~~our subsidiaries’ mortgage insurance claims handling practices in connection with denying, curtailing or rescinding coverage of ~~unclaimed property and escheatment practices and procedures. In~~mortgage insurance. Claimants seek damages in excess of $834 million, in addition to ~~the subpoena, other state regulators are conducting reviews~~interest and ~~examinations on the same subject.~~punitive damages. We ~~are cooperating with these requests and inquiries.~~

As previously disclosed, in December 2009, one of our non-insurance subsidiaries, one of the subsidiary’s officers and Genworth Financial, Inc. were named in a putative class action lawsuit captioned~~Michael J. Goodman and Linda Brown v. Genworth Financial Wealth Management, Inc., et al,~~ in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. In response to our motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, the Court granted on March 30, 2011 the motion to dismiss the state law fiduciary duty claim and denied the motion to dismiss the remaining federal claims. We continueintend to vigorously defend ~~this action.~~these actions.

(b) Commitments

As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we were committed to fund ~~$90~~$71 million in limited partnership investments and ~~$49~~$15 million in U.S. commercial mortgage loan investments.

(8) Borrowings and Other Financings

Revolving Credit Facilities

We have two five-year revolving credit facilities that mature in May 2012 and August 2012. These facilities bear variable interest rates based on one-month ~~LIBOR~~London Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin and we have access to $1.9 billion under these facilities. As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we had no borrowings under these facilities; however, we utilized ~~$279~~$254 million under these facilities primarily for the issuance of letters of credit for the benefit of one of our life insurance subsidiaries. As of December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had no borrowings under these facilities; however, we utilized ~~$56~~$257 million under these facilities primarily for the issuance of letters of credit for the benefit of one of our ~~lifestyle protection~~life insurance subsidiaries. At this time, we do not intend to renew our revolving credit facility that matures in May 2012. As we approach the maturity date for our August credit facility, we are evaluating, and will continue to evaluate, our options to extend, replace or refinance a portion of our credit facility. There can be no assurance that we will be able to extend, replace or refinance this facility on terms (or at targeted amounts) acceptable to us or at all.

Long-Term Notes

In ~~June 2011,~~March 2012, we priced a $350 million reopening of our ~~indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited, issued AUD$140 million of subordinated floating rate~~7.625% senior notes due ~~2021 with~~in September 2021. The notes were offered as additional debt securities under an ~~interest rate of three-month Bank Bill Swap reference rate plus a margin of 4.75%. Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited expects~~indenture, as supplemented from time to ~~use the proceeds it received from this transaction for general corporate purposes.~~

~~During the second quarter of 2011,~~time, pursuant to which we repaid ¥57.0 billion of senior notes that matured in June 2011, plus accrued interest. In addition, the arrangements to swap our obligations under these notes to a U.S. dollar obligation matured. These swaps had a notional principal amount of $491have previously issued $400 million with interest at a rate of 4.84% per year. Upon maturity of these swaps, we received $212 million from the derivative counterparty resulting in a net repayment of $491 million of principal related to these notes.

~~In March 2011, we issued senior notes having an~~ aggregate principal amount of ~~$400 million, with an interest rate equal to~~our 7.625% ~~per year payable semi-annually, and maturing~~senior notes due in September ~~2021 (“2021 Notes”).~~2021. The ~~2021 Notes~~notes are our direct, unsecured obligations and will rank equally with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. ~~We have the option to redeem all or a portion of the 2021 Notes at any time with proper notice to the note holders~~The notes were issued at a public offering price ~~equal to the greater~~ of ~~100%~~103% of principal ~~or the sum~~amount, with a yield to maturity of ~~the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the then-current treasury rate plus an applicable spread.~~7.184%. The net proceeds of ~~$397~~$358 million from the issuance of the ~~2021 Notes~~new notes were used for general corporate ~~purposes.~~purposes, including increasing liquidity at the holding company level.

Non-Recourse Funding Obligations

As of March 31, 2012, we had $2.6 billion of fixed and floating rate non-recourse funding obligations outstanding backing additional statutory reserves. In January 2012, as part of a life block sale transaction, we repurchased $475 million of our non-recourse funding obligations issued by River Lake Insurance Company III (“River Lake III”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, resulting in a U.S. GAAP after-tax gain of approximately $52 million. In connection with the repurchase, we ceded certain term life insurance policies to a third-party reinsurer resulting in a U.S. GAAP after-tax loss, net of amortization of deferred acquisition costs, of $93 million. The combined transactions resulted in a U.S. GAAP after-tax loss of approximately $41 million which was included in our U.S. Life Insurance segment. In February and March 2012, we repaid the remaining non-recourse funding obligations issued by River Lake III of $176 million.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock~~

On June 1, 2011, we redeemed all the remaining outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $50 per share, plus unpaid dividends accrued to the date of redemption, for $57 million.

~~Non-Recourse Funding Obligations~~

As of June 30, 2011, we had $3.4 billion of fixed and floating rate non-recourse funding obligations outstanding backing additional statutory reserves. In the second quarter of 2011, we repurchased principal of $57 million of notes secured by our non-recourse funding obligations, plus accrued interest, for a pre-tax gain of $17 million. As of June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the weighted-average interest rates on our non-recourse funding obligations were ~~1.33%~~1.30% and ~~1.44%~~1.41%, respectively.

(9) ~~Income Taxes~~

~~The reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the effective income tax rate was as follows for the periods indicated:~~

   Three months ended
June 30, Six months ended
June 30,
       2011         2010         2011         2010
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate
   35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Increase (reduction) in rate resulting from:

State income tax, net of federal income tax effect
   (2.4 ) —      4.3    (2.1 )
Benefit on tax favored investments
   (0.4 ) (8.0 ) (4.5 ) (7.1 )
Effect of foreign operations
   (24.8 ) (33.7 ) (5.9 ) (21.3 )
Non-deductible expenses
   1.2    2.2    0.2    0.5
Interest on uncertain tax positions
   (0.4 ) (2.4 ) 0.4    (2.3 )
Tax benefits related to separation from our former parent
   —      —      —      (55.8 )
Other, net
   0.9 —      0.5    1.8


Effective rate
   9.1 % (6.9 )% 30.0 % (51.3 )%

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the effective tax rate increased compared to the prior year primarily due to higher taxes in the current year as a result of a Canadian legislative change and an Australian tax legislation benefit in the prior year. The Canadian legislation change passed in June 2011 will eliminate the Canadian government guarantee fund. The elimination of the guarantee fund is expected to increase the effective tax rate on our U.S. GAAP earnings as prior deductions for contributions to the fund lowered the effective tax rate on U.S. GAAP earnings.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the effective tax rate increased from the prior year primarily due to changes in uncertain tax benefits related to our 2004 separation from our former parent, General Electric (“GE”). At the time of the separation, we made certain joint tax elections and realized certain tax benefits. During the first quarter of 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed an examination of GE’s 2004 tax return, including these tax impacts. Therefore, $106 million of previously uncertain tax benefits related to separation became certain and we recognized those in the first quarter of 2010. Additionally, we recorded $20 million as additional paid-in capital related to our 2004 separation. The effective tax rate also increased due to higher taxes in the current year pursuant to the Canadian legislative change as compared to an Australian tax legislative benefit in the prior year.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~(10)~~ Segment Information

We currently conduct our operations in ~~three~~the following operating business segments: (1) ~~Retirement and Protection,~~U.S. Life Insurance, which includes our life insurance, long-term care insurance ~~wealth management~~and fixed annuities businesses; (2) International Protection Insurance, which includes our lifestyle protection insurance business; (3) Wealth Management; (4) International Mortgage Insurance, which includes mortgage insurance-related products and ~~services and retirement income products; (2) International,~~services; (5) U.S. Mortgage Insurance, which includes ~~international~~ mortgage insurance-related products and ~~lifestyle protection insurance;~~services; and ~~(3) U.S. Mortgage Insurance.~~(6) Runoff, which includes the results of non-strategic products which are no longer actively sold. Our non-strategic products include our variable annuity, variable life insurance, institutional, corporate-owned life insurance and Medicare supplement insurance products. Institutional products consist of funding agreements, FABNs and GICs.

We also have Corporate and Other activities which include ~~interest and other~~ debt financing expenses ~~other~~that are incurred at our holding company level, unallocated corporate income and expenses, ~~not allocated to the segments,~~eliminations of inter-segment transactions and the results of ~~non-strategic products~~other non-core businesses that are managed outside of our operating ~~segments, and eliminations of inter-segment transactions.~~segments.

We use the same accounting policies and procedures to measure segment income (loss) and assets as our consolidated net income (loss) and assets. Our chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and allocates resources on the basis of “net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders.” We define net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders as income (loss) from continuing operations excluding net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, after-tax net investment gains (losses) and other adjustments and infrequent or unusual non-operating items. We exclude net investment gains (losses) and infrequent or unusual non-operating items because we do not consider them to be related to the operating performance of our segments and Corporate and Other activities. A component of our net investment gains (losses) is the result of impairments, the size and timing of which can vary significantly depending on market credit cycles. In addition, the size and timing of other investment gains (losses) can be subject to our discretion and are influenced by market opportunities, as well as asset-liability matching considerations. Infrequent or unusual non-operating items are also excluded from net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders if, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends. While some of these items may be significant components of net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we believe that net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders, and measures that are derived from or incorporate net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders, are appropriate measures that are useful to investors because they identify the income (loss) attributable to the ongoing operations of the business. However, net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders is not a substitute for net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, our definition of net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders may differ from the definitions used by other companies.

There were no infrequent or unusual non-operating items excluded from net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders during the periods ~~presented other than a $106 million tax benefit related to separation from our former parent recorded in the first quarter of 2010.~~presented.

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of revenues for our segments and Corporate and Other activities for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30, Six months ended
June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
   2011    2010 2011    2010
Revenues:

Retirement and Protection
   $ 1,784       $ 1,643    $ 3,522       $ 3,236
International
   658       622    1,290       1,273
U.S. Mortgage Insurance
   170       181    347       362
Corporate and Other
   43       (36 ) 64       (40 )






Total revenues
   $ 2,655       $ 2,410    $ 5,223       $ 4,831


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
Revenues:
U.S. Life Insurance segment:
Life insurance	$	373		$	495
Long-term care insurance		775			713
Fixed annuities		294			271

U.S. Life Insurance segment’s revenues		1,442			1,479

International Protection segment’s revenues		218			270

Wealth Management segment’s revenues		112			110

International Mortgage Insurance segment:
Canada		198			207
Australia		133			136
Other Countries		15			19

International Mortgage Insurance segment’s revenues		346			362

U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment’s revenues		189			177

Runoff segment’s revenues		133			178

Corporate and Other’s revenues		(14	)		(8	)

Total revenues	$	2,426		$	2,568

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for our segments and Corporate and Other activities and a reconciliation of net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for our segments and Corporate and Other activities to net income ~~(loss)~~ for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30, Six months ended
June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
       2011         2010         2011         2010
Retirement and Protection’s net operating income
   $ 149    $ 114    $ 276    $ 236
International’s net operating income
   107    105    231    196
U.S. Mortgage Insurance’s net operating loss
   (253 ) (40 ) (334 ) (76 )
Corporate and Other’s net operating loss
   (77 ) (61 ) (149 ) (124 )

Net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   (74 ) 118    24    232
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments
   (22 ) (76 ) (38 ) (118 )
Net tax benefit related to separation from our former parent
   —      —      —      106

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   (96 ) 42    (14 ) 220
Add: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
   36    35    70    69

Net income (loss)
   $ (60 ) $ 77    $ 56    $ 289


	Three months ended
	March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
U.S. Life Insurance segment:
Life insurance	$	6		$	42
Long-term care insurance		35			36
Fixed annuities		23			14

U.S. Life Insurance segment’s net operating income		64			92

International Protection segment’s net operating income		5			25

Wealth Management segment’s net operating income		12			10

International Mortgage Insurance segment:
Canada		37			51
Australia		(21	)		52
Other Countries		(9	)		(4	)

International Mortgage Insurance segment’s net operating income		7			99

U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment’s net operating loss		(43	)		(83	)

Runoff segment’s net operating income		35			1

Corporate and Other’s net operating loss		(49	)		(69	)

Net operating income		31			75
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments		16			(16	)

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		47			59
Add: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		33			34

Net income	$	80		$	93

The following is a summary of total assets for our segments and Corporate and Other activities as of the dates indicated:


					March 31,		December 31,
(Amounts in millions)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		2012		2011
Assets:
Retirement and Protection	$	87,119	$	86,352
International		12,834		12,422
U.S. Life Insurance					$	74,913	$	75,547
International Protection						2,453		2,375
Wealth Management						529		523
International Mortgage Insurance						9,760		9,643
U.S. Mortgage Insurance		4,048		3,875		2,808		2,966
Runoff						16,399		16,031
Corporate and Other		8,346		9,746		4,121		5,102

Total assets	$	112,347	$	112,395	$	110,983	$	112,187

GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~(11) Liability~~(10) Sale of Tax and Accounting Financial Advisor Unit

On April 2, 2012, we completed the sale of our tax and accounting financial advisor unit, Genworth Financial Investment Services (“GFIS”), for ~~Policy and Contract Claims~~

approximately $79 million, plus an earnout provision, to Cetera Financial Group. The ~~following table sets forth changes in~~earnout provides the ~~liability~~opportunity for ~~policy and contract claims for the dates indicated:~~

   As of or for the six
months ended
June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
   2011⁽¹⁾ 2010⁽²⁾
Beginning balance
   $ 6,933    $ 6,567
Less reinsurance recoverables
   (1,654 ) (1,769 )

Net beginning balance
   5,279    4,798

Incurred related to insured events of:

Current year
   1,720    1,641
Prior years
   494    120

Total incurred
   2,214    1,761

Paid related to insured events of:

Current year
   (475 ) (452 )
Prior years
   (1,373 ) (1,539 )

Total paid
   (1,848 ) (1,991 )

Interest on liability for policy and contract claims
   67    59
Foreign currency translation
   37    (63 )

Net ending balance
   5,749    4,564
Add reinsurance recoverables
   1,578    1,738

Ending balance
   $ 7,327    $ 6,302

⁽¹⁾

Current year reserves related to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were reduced by loss mitigation activities of $22 million related to workouts, loan modifications and pre-sales. Loss mitigation actions related to prior year delinquencies resulted in a reduction of expected losses of $230 million to date, including $211 million related to workouts, loan modifications and pre-sales, and $19 million related to rescissions, net of reinstatements of $49 million.

⁽²⁾

Current year reserves related to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were reduced by loss mitigation activities of $97 million, including $94 million related to workouts, loan modifications and pre-sales, and $3 million related to rescissions, net of reinstatements. Loss mitigation actions related to prior year delinquencies resulted in a reduction of expected losses of $353 million to date, including $201 million related to workouts, loan modifications and pre-sales, and $152 million related to rescissions, net of reinstatements of $107 million.

We establish reserves for the ultimate cost of settling claims on reported and unreported insured events that have occurred on or before the respective reporting period. These liabilities are associated primarily with our mortgage, long-term care and lifestyle protection insurance products and represent our best estimates of the liabilities at the timeus to receive additional future compensation based on ~~known facts, historical trends of claim payments and other external factors, such as various trends in economic conditions, housing prices, employment rates, mortality, morbidity and medical costs.~~

While the liability for policy and contract claims represents our current best estimates, there may be additional adjustments to these amounts based on information and trends not presently known. Such adjustments, reflecting any variety of new and adverse or favorable trends, could possibly be significant, exceeding the currently recorded reserves by an amount that could be material to our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. For

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

example, in our U.S. mortgage insurance business, the amount and rate at which home prices, employment levels and cure rates for delinquent loans change could result in additional changes to reserves in future periods.

As of June 30, 2011, the increase in the ending liability for policy and contract claims was largely related to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment due to a reserve strengthening in the second quarter of 2011. In addition, our long-term care insurance business increased as a result of growth of the in-force block and claims experience including the severity and duration of existing claims.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we strengthened prior year reserves by $494 million as a result of changes in estimates related to prior year insured events and the development of information and trends not previously known when establishing the reserves in prior periods.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we increased prior year reserves in our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment by $382 million from $2,282 million as of December 31, 2010. During the second quarter of 2011, we strengthened reserves by $299 million as a result of worsening trends in recent experience in the quarter as well as market trends in an environment of continuing weakness in the U.S. residential real estate market. These trends reflected a decline in cure rates in the second quarter of 2011 for delinquent loans and continued aging trends in the delinquent loan inventory. These trends were associated with a range of factors, including slow-moving pipelines of mortgages in some stage of foreclosure and delinquent loans under consideration for loan modifications. Specifically, reduced cure rates were driven by lower borrower self-cures and lower levels of lender loan modifications outside of government-sponsored modification programs. The decline in cure rates was also concentrated in earlier term delinquencies at a level higher than expected or historically experienced. In our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment, loss mitigation actions that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011 resulted in a reduction of expected losses of $252 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we increased prior year claim reserves related to our long-term care insurance business by $144 million from $3,678 million as of December 31, 2010. In the current stressed economic environment, we have experienced an increase in severity and duration of claims associated with observed loss development which contributed to the reserve increase.

For our other businesses, the remaining favorable development during the six months ended June 30, 2011 related to refinements to our estimates as part of our reserving process on both reported and unreported insured events occurring in the prior year that were not significant.

As of June 30, 2010, the decrease in the ending liability for policy and contract claims was largely related to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment due principally to a substantial decrease in flow delinquencies, coupled with a settlement that was reached with a GSE counterparty regardingachieving certain bulk Alt-A business in the first quarter of 2010. In our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment, loss mitigation actions that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2010 resulted in a reduction of expected losses of $450 million. Our international mortgage insurance business also decreased from favorable global economic and housing market conditions. These decreases were partially offset by an increase related to our long-term care insurance business as a result of growth of the in-force block and claims experience, including the severity and duration of existing claims.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we strengthened prior year reserves by $120 million primarily related to our long-term care insurance business. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we increased prior year reserves in our long-term care insurance business by $109 million from $3,188 million as of December 31, 2009. We experienced an increase in severity and duration of claims associated with observed loss development which contributed to the reserve increase.

~~GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

For our other businesses, the remaining unfavorable development during the six months ended June 30, 2010 related to refinements to our estimates as part of our reserving process on both reported and unreported insured events occurring in the prior year that were not significant.

~~(12) Sale of Medicare Supplement Insurance Business~~

In June 2011, we reached an agreement to sell our Medicare supplement insurance business for $290 million in cash, subject to customary adjustments based on the amount of capital in the business at closing.revenue goals. We expect to recognize a realized gain onof approximately $15 million related to the ~~sale, with the closing of the sale expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2011. Our Medicare supplement insurance business~~sale. GFIS is included in our ~~long-term care insurance business in our Retirement and Protection~~Wealth Management segment. The transaction includes the sale of Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, Tennessee and its subsidiary, American Continental Insurance Company, and the reinsurance of the Medicare supplement insurance in-force business written by other Genworth life insurance subsidiaries.

~~(13) Noncontrolling Interests~~

In June 2011, Genworth MI Canada Inc. (“Genworth Canada”), our indirect subsidiary, repurchased approximately 6.2 million common shares for CAD$160 million through a substantial issuer bid. Brookfield Life Assurance Company Limited, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, participated in the issuer bid by making a proportionate tender and received CAD$90 million and continues to hold approximately 57.5% of the outstanding common shares of Genworth Canada.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein and with our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements

This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “will” or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the outlook for our future business and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially due to global political, economic, business, competitive, market, regulatory and other factors and risks, including the following:

•

Risks relating to our businesses, including downturns and volatility in global economies and equity and credit ~~markets,~~markets; downgrades or potential downgrades in our financial strength or credit ~~ratings,~~ratings; interest rate fluctuations and ~~levels,~~levels; adverse capital and credit market ~~conditions,~~conditions; the impact on the potential extension, replacement or refinancing of our credit facilities; the valuation of fixed maturity, equity and trading ~~securities,~~securities; defaults, downgrades or other events impacting the value of our fixed maturity securities ~~portfolio,~~portfolio; defaults on our commercial mortgage loans or the mortgage loans underlying our investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities and volatility in ~~performance,~~performance; goodwill ~~impairments, default~~impairments; defaults by counterparties to reinsurance arrangements or derivative ~~instruments,~~instruments; an adverse change in risk-based capital and other regulatory ~~requirements,~~requirements; insufficiency of ~~reserves,~~reserves; legal constraints on dividend distributions by our ~~subsidiaries, competition,~~subsidiaries; competition; availability, affordability and adequacy of ~~reinsurance,~~reinsurance; loss of key distribution ~~partners,~~partners; regulatory restrictions on our operations and changes in applicable laws and ~~regulations,~~regulations; legal or regulatory investigations or ~~actions,~~actions; the failure of or any compromise of the security of our computer ~~systems,~~systems; the occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or a ~~pandemic,~~pandemic; the effect of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ~~Act,~~Act; changes in the accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard-setting ~~bodies and~~bodies; impairments of or valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets;

•

~~Risks relating to our Retirement and Protection segment~~~~, including~~ changes in expected morbidity and mortality rate; accelerated amortization of deferred acquisition costs and present value of future ~~profits,~~profits; reputational risks as a result of rate increases on certain in-force long-term care insurance ~~products,~~products; medical advances, such as genetic research and diagnostic imaging, and related ~~legislation,~~legislation; unexpected changes in persistency ~~rates,~~rates; ability to continue to implement actions to mitigate the impact of statutory reserve ~~requirements and~~requirements; the failure of demand for long-term care insurance to increase;

•

~~Risks relating to our International segment~~~~, including~~ political and economic instability or changes in government ~~policies,~~policies; foreign exchange rate ~~fluctuations,~~fluctuations; unexpected changes in unemployment ~~rates,~~rates; unexpected increases in mortgage insurance default rates or severity of ~~defaults,~~defaults; the significant portion of high loan-to-value insured international mortgage loans which generally result in more and larger claims than lower loan-to-value ~~ratios,~~ratios; competition with government-owned and government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”) offering mortgage ~~insurance and~~insurance; changes in ~~regulations;~~

•

~~Risks relating to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment~~~~, including~~international regulations reducing demand for mortgage insurance; increases in mortgage insurance default ~~rates,~~rates; failure to meet, or have waived to the extent needed, the minimum statutory capital requirements and hazardous financial condition ~~standards,~~standards; uncertain results of continued investigations of insured U.S. mortgage ~~loans,~~loans; possible rescissions of coverage and the results of objections to our ~~rescissions,~~rescissions; the extent to which loan modifications and other similar programs may provide benefits to ~~us,~~us; unexpected changes in unemployment and underemployment rates in the United States; further deterioration in economic conditions or a further decline in home prices in the United States; problems associated with foreclosure process

defects in the United States that may defer claim ~~payments,~~payments; changes to the role or structure of Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage

Corporation (“Freddie Mac”),; competition with government-owned and government-sponsored enterprises offering U.S. mortgage ~~insurance,~~insurance; changes in regulations that affect ~~the~~our U.S. mortgage insurance ~~business,~~business; the influence of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and a small number of large mortgage lenders and ~~investors,~~investors; decreases in the volume of high loan-to-value mortgage originations or increases in mortgage insurance cancellations in the United States; increases in the use of alternatives to private mortgage insurance in the United States and reductions by lenders in the level of coverage they ~~select,~~select; the impact of the use of reinsurance with reinsurance companies affiliated with U.S. mortgage lending ~~customers,~~customers; legal actions under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”); and potential liabilities in connection with our U.S. contract underwriting services;

•

Other risks, including the risk that adverse market or other conditions might further delay or impede the planned initial public offering (“IPO”) of our mortgage insurance business in Australia; the possibility that in certain circumstances we will be obligated to make payments to General Electric Company (“GE”) under the tax matters agreement with GE even if our corresponding tax savings are never realized and payments could be accelerated in the event of certain changes in ~~control~~control; and provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the tax matters agreement with GE may discourage takeover attempts and business combinations that stockholders might consider in their best interests; and

•

Risks relating to our common stock,, including the suspension of dividends and stock price fluctuations.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Overview

Our business

We are a leading financial security company dedicated to providing insurance, wealth management, investment and financial solutions to more than 15 million customers, with a presence in more than 25 countries. We have ~~three~~the following operating segments: ~~Retirement and Protection, International and U.S. Mortgage Insurance.~~

•

~~Retirement and Protection.~~U.S. Life Insurance. We offer ~~and/or~~and manage a variety of ~~protection, wealth management~~insurance and ~~retirement income~~fixed annuity products. Our primary insurance products include life and long-term care insurance. Additionally, we offer other Medicare supplement insurance products, as well as care coordination services for our long-term care policyholders. Our wealth management and retirement income products include: a variety of managed account programs and advisor services, financial planning services and fixed deferred and immediate individual annuities. We previously offered variable deferred annuities and group variable annuities offered through retirement plans. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, our ~~Retirement~~U.S. Life Insurance segment’s net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were $58 million and $64 million, respectively.

•

International Protection. We are a leading provider of payment protection coverages (referred to as lifestyle protection) in multiple European countries. Our lifestyle protection insurance products primarily help consumers meet specified payment obligations should they become unable to pay due to accident, illness, involuntary unemployment, disability or death. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, our International Protection segment’s net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were ~~$123~~$6 million and ~~$149~~$5 million, respectively.

•

Wealth Management. We offer and manage a variety of wealth management services, including investments, advisor support and practice management services. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, our ~~Retirement and Protection~~Wealth Management segment’s net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were ~~$235 million and $276 million, respectively.~~both $12 million.

•

~~International.~~International Mortgage Insurance. ~~We offer mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance products and related services in multiple markets.~~ We are a leading provider of mortgage insurance products and related services in Canada, Australia, Mexico and multiple European countries. Our products predominantly insure prime-based, individually underwritten residential mortgage loans, also known as

flow mortgage insurance. On a limited basis, we also provide mortgage insurance on a structured, or bulk, basis that aids in the sale of mortgages to the capital markets and helps lenders manage capital and risk. ~~We are a leading provider of protection coverages primarily associated with certain financial obligations (referred~~Additionally, we offer services, analytical tools and technology that enable lenders to as lifestyle protection) in multiple European countries. These lifestyle protection insurance products help consumers meet specified payment obligations should they become unable to pay due to accident, illness, involuntary

~~unemployment, disability or death.~~operate efficiently and manage risk. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, our International Mortgage Insurance segment’s net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were $110 million and $107 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our International segment’s net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were $237 million and $231 million, respectively.both $7 million.

•

U.S. Mortgage Insurance.In the United States, we offer mortgage insurance products predominantly insuring prime-based, individually underwritten residential mortgage loans, also known as flow mortgage insurance. We selectively provide mortgage insurance on a ~~structured, or~~ bulk basis with essentially all of our bulk writings prime-based. Additionally, we offer services, analytical tools and technology that enable lenders to operate efficiently and manage ~~capital and~~ risk. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment’s net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were ~~$252~~$26 million and ~~$253~~$43 million, respectively.

•

Runoff.The Runoff segment includes the results of non-strategic products which are no longer actively sold. Our non-strategic products include our variable annuity, variable life insurance, institutional, corporate-owned life insurance and Medicare supplement insurance products. Institutional products consist of funding agreements, funding agreements backing notes (“FABNs”) and guaranteed investment contracts (“GICs”). In January 2011, we discontinued new sales of retail and group variable annuities while continuing to service our existing blocks of business. Effective October 1, 2011, we completed the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2012, our ~~U.S. Mortgage Insurance~~Runoff segment’s net ~~loss~~income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating ~~loss~~income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were ~~$333~~$62 million and ~~$334~~$35 million, respectively.

We also have Corporate and Other activities which include debt financing expenses that are incurred at our holding company level, unallocated corporate income and expenses, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and the results of ~~non-strategic products~~other non-core businesses that are managed outside of our operating segments. Our non-strategic products include our institutional and corporate-owned life insurance products. Institutional products consist of: funding agreements, funding agreements backing notes (“FABNs”) and guaranteed investment contracts (“GICs”). For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders were both $77 million for Corporate and Other activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2011,March 31, 2012, Corporate and Other activities had a net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and a net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders of ~~$153~~$72 million and ~~$149~~$49 million, respectively.

Business trends and conditions

Our business is, and we expect will continue to be, influenced by a number of industry-wide and product-specific trends and conditions. The following discussion of business trends and conditions should be read together with the trends discussed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which described additional business trends and conditions.

General conditions and trends affecting our businesses

Financial and economic environment. The stability of both the financial markets and global economies in which we operate impacts the sales, revenue growth and profitability trends of our businesses. ~~Improvements in equity~~Equity markets, credit markets and interest rate spreads ~~seen~~generally improved during ~~2010 generally continued in~~ the first ~~half~~quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. Although global financial markets experienced some improvement during the first quarter of 2012, the European debt crisis and concerns regarding the U.S. ~~debt ceiling impacted~~economy continued to impact the ~~rate of~~ recovery.

The U.S. housing market reflected continuing stress and growing levels of foreclosures with variations in performance by sub-market, including signs of stabilization within certain regions while others declined. Unemployment and underemployment levels in the United States remained relatively constant with the fourth quarter of ~~2010 and the first quarter of~~2011 that experienced a slight decline in December 2011. We expect unemployment and underemployment levels in the United States to stabilize at elevated levels and gradually decrease over time though remain elevated for an extended period. In Canada, the housing market ~~continued to improve with~~was pressured by a smaller

refinance market while home prices ~~remaining stable, while~~increased modestly and unemployment levels ~~improved modestly~~decreased slightly from the ~~first~~fourth quarter of 2011. In Australia, the overall housing market has remained fairly stable with home prices ~~declining modestly from the first quarter of 2011~~ and unemployment ~~levels~~ remaining consistent with the ~~first~~fourth quarter of ~~2011. Consumers~~2011 with some regional variations. Economic growth in

Australia ~~became more cautious~~slowed given the economic impact of pressures from higher interest rates, higher costs of living, ~~general concerns about the global economy~~higher exchange rates and ~~slow recovery~~cautious consumer spending, particularly in ~~regions impacted~~coastal tourism areas of Queensland where these pressures were exacerbated by the ~~recent natural disasters.~~flooding in January 2011. Europe overall remained a slow growth environment with lower lending activity and reduced consumer spending, particularly in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Italy, in part as a result of the European debt ~~crisis.~~crisis and actual or anticipated austerity initiatives. See “—Trends and conditions affecting our segments” below for a discussion regarding the impacts the financial markets and global economies have on our businesses.

Slow or varied levels of economic growth, coupled with uncertain financial markets and economic outlooks, changes in government policy, regulatory reforms and other changes in market conditions, influenced, and we believe will continue to influence, investment and spending decisions by consumers and businesses as they adjust their consumption, debt, capital and risk profiles in response to these conditions. ~~Although these~~These trends ~~have generally improved~~change as investor confidence in the markets and the outlook for some consumers and businesses ~~strengthened,~~shift. As a result, our sales, revenues and profitability trends of certain insurance and investment products have been and could be further ~~adversely~~ impacted negatively or positively going forward. In particular, factors such as government spending, monetary policies, ~~concerns around resolution of the U.S. debt ceiling,~~ the volatility and strength of the capital markets, anticipated tax policy changes and the impact of ~~U.S. healthcare and~~ global financial regulation reform will continue to affect economic and business outlooks and consumer behaviors moving forward.

The U.S. government, Federal Reserve and other legislative and regulatory bodies ~~continue to take~~have taken certain actions to support the economy and capital markets, influence interest rates, influence housing markets and mortgage servicing and provide liquidity to promote economic growth. These include various mortgage restructuring programs implemented or under consideration by the GSEs, lenders, servicers and the U.S. government. Outside of the United States, various governments previously took actions to stimulate economies, stabilize financial systems and improve market liquidity. In ~~general,~~aggregate, these actions ~~have previously~~ had a positive effect in the short term on these countries and their markets; however, there can be no assurance as to the future level of impact these types of ~~action~~actions may have on the economic and financial markets, including levels of volatility. A delayed economic recovery period, or a U.S. or global ~~recessionary~~recession or ~~debt~~regional or global financial crisis ~~setback~~ could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We ~~evaluate~~manage our product offerings, investment and asset-liability management strategies to moderate risk especially during periods of strained economic and financial market conditions. In addition, we continue to review our product and distribution management strategies to align with our strengths, profitability targets and risk tolerance. These and other company actions should enhance our competitive position as well as our capital flexibility and liquidity.

~~Volatility in credit~~Credit and investment markets. ~~During~~The tone of the ~~second~~market improved during the first quarter of ~~2011, markets were characterized by high levels~~2012. Signs of ~~uncertainty regarding resolution~~an improving U.S. economy, continued emerging market growth and solidification of ~~issues around peripheral Europe~~supportive European Central Bank policies and ~~particularly toward~~actions led to greater market confidence and a generally tightening spread environment versus the latter part of 2011. Spreads on U.S. and European financial issues tightened, given U.S. bank stress-testing, positive policy and macro-economic developments globally, and limited new issuance in the ~~quarter, disappointing economic data and concerns around resolution~~sector. Corporate deal flow outside of the ~~U.S. debt ceiling. Spreads on domestic U.S. issuances continued to decline early~~financial sector was very strong during the first quarter of 2012 as issuers took advantage of low treasury rates and a receptive market, although dealer inventories remained low. Demand and deal flow in the ~~second~~structured product market was also strong. Towards the end of the first quarter of ~~2011,~~2012, however, as ~~uncertainty remained contained~~Portuguese and Spanish credit default spread widening gained focus, we began to see some decline in demand and issuance was strong. However, as the European Union’s policy failed to provide conclusive support for Greece and other less stable peripheral European countries, and concerns about the U.S. debt ceiling rose, issuances declined markedly and creditretracement of spreads, ~~began to widen. Despite these adverse developments and spread widening~~particularly in global financial companies.

We recorded net other-than-temporary impairments of $17 million during the ~~second~~first quarter of 2012, which were lower than 2011 ~~investor demand remained strong for investment grade debt~~levels and ~~higher quality issues that came~~we expect losses to market were generally oversubscribed. Similarly for securitized products, the latter half of the second quarter of 2011 saw increased volatility, mainly driven by weaker economic and housing data. In addition, the liquidation ofmoderate further from prior year levels. Even though certain non-agency securities by the Federal Reserve weighed heavily on the markets, and this coupled with heavy issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities put pressure on both residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities.

~~Certain~~

segments of the marketplace are still experiencing declines in the performance of collateral underlying certain structured securities, ~~but~~ impairments of structured securities in our investment portfolio declined further in the ~~second quarter of 2011 from the moderate levels recorded in the second half of 2010 and the~~ first quarter of ~~2011.~~

~~We recorded net other-than-temporary impairments of $62 million during~~2012 from the ~~six months ended June 30,~~ 2011 ~~which were lower than prior year levels and we expect losses to moderate further.~~levels. Although economic conditions may continue to negatively impact certain investment valuations, the underlying collateral associated with our securities that have not been impaired continues to perform.

Looking ahead, we believe that the current credit environment provides us with opportunities to invest across a variety of asset classes to meet our yield requirements, as well as to continue execution of various risk management disciplines involving further diversification within the investment portfolio. See “—Investments and Derivative Instruments” for additional information on our investment portfolio.

Trends and conditions affecting our segments

~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance

Life insurance. Results of our life insurance business are impacted by sales, mortality, persistency, investment yields, expenses, reinsurance and statutory reserve requirements. Additionally, sales of our products and persistency of our insurance in-force are dependent on competitive product features and pricing, underwriting, effective distribution and customer service.

Life insurance sales increased induring the first ~~half~~quarter of ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~the first half of 2010 due to strong adoption~~2011 from sales of our ~~new~~ term universal and universal life insurance ~~product.~~products. Sales of our term universal ~~life insurance product were up 29% in the first half of 2011 versus the traditional term~~ and ~~term~~ universal life insurance ~~sales~~products increased 3% and 7%, respectively, in ~~the prior year and up 16% from~~ the first quarter of ~~2011. We believe our term universal life insurance product offers a better value proposition~~2012 versus the same period in the prior year. Due to the ~~consumer when compared~~low interest rate environment and to maintain our ~~traditional term life insurance~~desired mix of business, we have raised prices on certain products ~~which~~and exited others. Therefore, we ~~no longer sell. We believe our term universal life insurance product has been competitively priced for the middle and emerging affluent markets as reflected in recent trends. We~~ expect ~~our~~reduced sales levels ~~could be impacted by shifts~~during 2012. Shifts in consumer demand, relative pricing, return on capital or reinsurance decisions and other ~~factors; therefore, we expect to see a reduced level of~~factors, such as regulatory matters affecting universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees, could also affect our sales ~~in the second half of 2011.~~levels.

Throughout ~~2010~~2011 and ~~into 2011,~~beginning in 2012, we experienced favorable mortality results in our term life insurance products as compared to priced mortality assumptions. During this same period, while less severe in 2011 than in prior ~~quarters,~~years, we have experienced lower persistency as compared to pricing assumptions for 10-year term life insurance policies as they go through their post-level rate period. We expect this trend in persistency to continue as these 10-year term life insurance policies go through their post-level rate period and then moderate thereafter.

Regulations XXX and AXXX require insurers to establish additional statutory reserves for term life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees and for certain universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees. This increases the capital required to write these products to be in excess of economic requirements. The alternatives available to reduce the impact for the increased reserve requirements on some of our in-force books of business have over time become limited or more expensive.products. Despite this, committed funding sources are in place for approximately 95% of our anticipated peak level reserves required under Regulations XXX and ~~AXXX, and therefore we believe unfunded reserve exposure is minimal. In addition,~~AXXX. The alternatives available to finance the ~~statutory~~increased reserve requirements on some of ~~Regulations XXX and AXXX are currently being reviewed by the Life Actuarial Task Force~~our in-force books of business have over time become limited or more expensive.

Recently, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”). formed a Joint Working Group to review the statutory reserve requirements of Regulation AXXX impacting certain universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees. In March 2012, the NAIC adopted a framework to address these reserving issues, and subsequently retained an actuarial consultant to help resolve the framework’s proposal for addressing in-force business and business that will be written in an interim period until the adoption of a principles-based reserve (“PBR”) approach. While it is too early to assess ~~how this task force~~the magnitude the framework will ~~address specific issues, if any, related~~have on future reserving requirements, we expect changes to ~~the statutory reserve~~such requirements ~~any new interpretation of, or~~that will impact future ~~revisions to, the valuation requirements could impact our life insurance business.~~sales and product design industry-wide.

Long-term care insurance. Results of our long-term care insurance business are influenced by sales, morbidity, mortality, persistency, investment yields, expenses and ~~reinsurance as well as~~reinsurance. Additionally, sales of our products are impacted by the relative competitiveness of our ~~offerings.~~offerings based on product features and pricing, including our ability to implement future rate actions as deemed necessary.

~~In recent years, industry-wide~~Industry-wide first-year annualized premiums of long-term care insurance declined during the recession and rebounded beginning in 2010 as the economy stabilized. ~~This positive trend continued during 2011.~~Industry sales grew 4% in 2011 compared to 2010. Sales ~~of our individual long-term care insurance product increased 47%~~moderated in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 and as a result, our sales decreased versus the ~~prior year~~

~~due in part to growth in the market and competitor actions. These trends combined with the impacts~~fourth quarter of ~~the progress made on our multiple growth initiatives relating to distribution effectiveness and broadening of our individual and group offerings have resulted in increased sales.~~2011. We expect ~~our~~sales to continue to moderate throughout 2012 with sales levels ~~could be~~ impacted by shifts in consumer demand, relative pricing, pricing of next generation products, return on capital and reinsurance decisions and other ~~factors; therefore, we expect~~factors. We continue to ~~see a reduced level of sales~~evaluate new product pricing and have utilized reinsurance in the ~~second half~~form of ~~2011. In addition, we have experienced,~~coinsurance to improve profitability and ~~may continue to experience, higher claims than priced~~capacity for ~~in older issued policies which negatively impact~~new business. We are currently reinsuring on a 40% coinsurance basis our ~~results of operations.~~

~~Since the fourth quarter of 2010, several of our competitors have exited the~~most recent individual long-term care insurance market or announced their intent to seek rate actions on their individual and certain group long-term care insurance products. These announcements by competitors have disrupted the market and could impact our sales going forward.offerings.

We continue pursuing ~~multiple~~ initiatives to improve the risk and profitability profile of our long-term care insurance business including: new product issuance and service offerings; investing in care coordination capabilities; refining underwriting requirements; maintaining tight expense management; actively exploring ~~alternative~~additional reinsurance strategies; executing effective investment strategies; and considering other actions to improve ~~business profitability and~~ the performance of the overall block. These efforts include evaluating the need for future in-force rate increases, where ~~warranted.~~warranted, on older issued policies. In this regard, we began filing for a rate increase of 18% on two blocks of older long-term care insurance policies in November 2010. As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we have received approvals in 3043 states which represent ~~more than 50%~~approximately 70% of the ~~impacted~~targeted premiums. The state approval process of an in-force rate increase and the amount of the rate increase varies, and in certain states the decision to approve or decline can take up to two ~~years to obtain approval.~~years. Upon approval, premium increases may only occur on an insured’s ~~policy~~billing anniversary date. Therefore, the benefits of any rate increase may not be fully realized until the implementation is ~~complete over the next few years.~~complete.

Changes in regulations or government programs, including long-term care insurance rate action legislation ~~and certain aspects of healthcare reform, such as the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (“CLASS”) Act,~~ could impact our long-term care insurance business positively or negatively. As such, we continue to actively monitor regulatory developments.

In June 2011, we reached an agreement to sell our Medicare supplement insurance business for $290 million in cash, subject to customary adjustments based on the amount of capital in the business at closing. We expect to recognize a realized gain on the sale, with the closing of the sale expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2011.

~~Wealth management.~~Fixed annuities.Results of our ~~wealth management business are impacted by the demand for asset management products and related support services, investment performance and equity market conditions.~~

Our introduction of new investment strategies, the expansion of products and services we offer to our advisors and an increase in the number of advisors that do business with us have collectively contributed to our growth in assets under management from sales and positive net flows for nine sequential quarters. Depending upon the direction of equity and fixed ~~income markets in the future, we could see a correlated impact on sales, net flows and assets under management.~~

On December 31, 2010, we purchased the operating assets of Altegris Capital, LLC (“Altegris”). This acquisition provided a platform of alternative investments including hedge funds and managed futures products and had approximately $2.2 billion in client assets as of December 31, 2010.

~~Retirement income.~~~~Results of our retirement income~~annuities business are affected by investment performance, interest rate levels, slope of the interest rate yield curve, net interest spreads, ~~equity market conditions,~~ mortality, policyholder ~~lapses,~~surrenders, new product sales and ~~relative~~ competitiveness of our offerings. Our competitive position within many of our distribution channels and our ability to grow this business depends on many factors, including product offerings and relative pricing and company ratings. Our product offerings include current and minimum crediting rates on our spread-based products and surrender charges. Guaranteed benefit features of our in-force variable annuity products provide guaranteed death or living benefits to the consumer.pricing.

Refinements of product offerings and related pricing, including reduced commission structures, and investment strategies reflect targeted growth plans to achieve appropriate risk adjusted returns. In January 2011, we discontinued sales of our individual and group variable annuities; however, we will continue to service our existing block of business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts.

In fixed annuities, sales may fluctuate as a result of consumer demand, changes in interest rates, credit spreads, relative pricing, return on capital decisions, and ~~as we offer these products using a~~our disciplined approach to ~~manage risks.~~managing risk. We have ~~introduced new market value adjustment deferred annuity products in the brokerage general agency (“BGA”) channel and we have~~ re-priced ~~immediate~~fixed annuities to maintain or increase spreads and targeted returns. Looking ahead, we will continue to actively evaluate marketing and investment strategies in the event that interest rates ~~increase.~~change. We have targeted distributors and producers and maintained sales capabilities that align with our focused strategy. We ~~have expanded distribution relationships with new financial institutions, independent financial planners and BGAs and we~~ expect to continue to ~~further expand~~build these distribution relationships while selectively adding ~~additional~~or shifting towards other product ~~offerings.~~offerings, including fixed indexed annuities.

~~In variable annuities,~~Refinements of product offerings and related pricing, including use of reduced commission structures and disciplined investment strategies, support our target of achieving appropriate risk-adjusted returns. Sales in the improvement in equity markets favorably impacted our results. In the future, equity market performance and volatility could result in additional gains or losses in our variable annuity products although associated hedging activities are expected to mitigate these impacts. As this is a closed blockfirst quarter of ~~business, we will see limited new deposits~~2012 moderated as we ~~will only accept additional deposits on existing contracts.~~

~~International~~

~~International mortgage insurance.~~~~Results of~~continued our ~~international mortgage insurance business are affected by changes in regulatory environments, employment levels, consumer borrowing behavior, lender mortgage-related strategies~~disciplined approach to product pricing and other economic and housing market influences, including interest rate trends, home price appreciation or depreciation, mortgage origination volume, levels of mortgage delinquencies and movements in foreign currency exchange rates.

~~Canada and Australia comprise approximately 97% of our international mortgage insurance~~ risk ~~in-force with an estimated average effective loan-to-value ratio of 60% as of June 30, 2011.~~management. We expect ~~that these established markets will continue to be key drivers of revenues and earnings in our international mortgage insurance business. Our entry and~~moderate sales growth ~~in developing international markets will remain selective and disciplined.~~

In Canada, during the first half of 2011, favorable economic conditions persisted with housing affordability benefiting from low interest rates and historically low unemployment levels. In 2011, the Bank of Canada maintained the overnight rate at 1.0% which was set in 2010 and we expect the Bank of Canada to slightly increase the overnight rate through the remainder of 2011. During the first half of 2011, home prices increased modestly in Canada and we expect home prices to remain consistent with the current levels during the remainder of ~~the year. Additionally, the unemployment rate in Canada improved marginally from the first quarter of 2011.~~

In Canada, flow new insurance written during the first half of 2011 remained consistent with levels in the first half of 2010. As of June 30, 2011, our 2010 book of business represents 12% of our insurance in-force while our 2007 and 2008 book years, the two largest in our portfolio, together represent 31% of our insurance in-force. As a result of our large 2007 and 2008 book years and subsequent smaller books seasoning during 2011, earned premiums in Canada are expected to decline moderately relative to 2010 levels. In January 2011, the Canadian government announced new mortgage rules that became effective in March and April of 2011. These changes may reduce the amount of flow new insurance written in 2011 primarily due to a smaller refinance market. The impact on net premiums written will depend upon the refinance share of new mortgage originations and the effect of the elimination of the 35-year amortization option. We expect this trend to continue if economic conditions in Canada continue to be favorable and we are able to continue to gradually increase our market share.

Losses in Canada have remained relatively flat from levels experienced in 2010 as improving overall economic conditions and stable housing markets, as well as the success we experienced with our loss mitigation initiatives, were pressured by delinquency trends in Alberta earlier in the year. While loss levels may vary quarterly based on seasonal or event-driven fluctuations, we expect our overall loss levels in Canada to improve modestly over time compared with levels experienced in 2010.

In June 2011, the Canadian government passed legislation, that when effective, will formalize existing mortgage insurance arrangements with private mortgage insurers to eliminate the Canadian government guarantee fund. The elimination of the guarantee fund is expected to increase our effective tax rate on a U.S. GAAP basis, as prior deductions for contributions to the fund lowered the effective tax rate on Canadian earnings. However, this legislation does not change the current government guarantee of 90% provided on mortgages we insure. While we do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business as a result of this legislation, a full assessment of the impact on our business cannot be completed until the regulations are finalized.

As part of our capital optimization strategies, Genworth MI Canada Inc. (“Genworth Canada”), our indirect subsidiary, repurchased CAD$160 million of its existing common shares through a substantial issuer bid in June 2011. Brookfield Life Assurance Company Limited (“Brookfield”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, participated in the issuer bid by making a proportionate tender and received CAD$90 million and continues to hold approximately 57.5% of the outstanding common shares of Genworth Canada.

In Australia, the economy has slowed, particularly in Queensland, given the economic impact of the flooding in January 2011, pressures from higher interest rates, higher costs of living, higher exchange rates and cautious consumer spending. As a result, increased levels of new delinquencies were reported by financial institutions in this market, which adversely impacted the results of our operations. The housing market in Australia has remained fairly stable despite home price declines in the second quarter of 2011 and we expect home prices to remain consistent with current levels. Additionally, unemployment levels remained consistent with the first quarter of 2011. In 2011, the Reserve Bank of Australia maintained the cash rate at 4.75% which is consistent with the rate in December 2010 and we expect the Reserve Bank of Australia to maintain the cash rate near current levels through the remainder of the year.

Total mortgage market activity in Australia continued to slow during the first half of 2011 as consumers became more cautious about higher interest rates, rising personal debt levels and global economic uncertainty. Additionally, some lenders were slow to return to the high loan-to-value market. Our flow new insurance written further decreased during the first quarter of 2011 compared to the fourth quarter of 2010 reflecting a smaller mortgage originations market, as well as the economic impact of recent natural disasters. While flow new insurance written in the second quarter of 2011 improved from the first quarter of 2011, we expect flow new insurance written to remain flat compared to 2010 levels for the remainder of the year.

Losses in Australia improved throughout most of 2010 as a result of continued loss mitigation activities and the benefits of the improving economic environment. In the first quarter of 2011, this trend reversed driven by higher reserves for claims anticipated from the natural disasters during that quarter, particularly the flooding in Queensland. In the second quarter of 2011, there was an increase in delinquencies and reserves as the cumulative impact of the factors noted previously exerted pressure on elements of the portfolio. We expect these pressures to continue through the remainder of 2011 resulting in an elevated loss ratio as was seen in the second quarter of 2011 which may begin to moderate in 2012.

As part of our strategy to reduce dependence on affiliate reinsurance and to aid the capital optimization strategies in Australia, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited, issued AUD$140 million of subordinated floating rate notes in June 2011.

In many of our European mortgage insurance markets, we have observed early signs of stabilization as unemployment rates appear to be peaking and declines in home prices have moderated. The overall economic environment in Europe, however, continues to be dominated by concerns about the fiscal health of the region, which has created uncertainty about the timing and speed of economic recovery.

Over the past several years, we significantly expanded our focus on, and the resources devoted to, loss mitigation initiatives, including programs that actively partner with our lenders to find solutions that cure delinquencies through actions such as loan modifications that keep borrowers in their homes, asset management strategies such as arranged and facilitated sales and pursuing recoveries. Loan modification programs benefit all parties as borrowers are able to remain in their homes, lenders maintain their relationship with the borrower while retaining an interest earning asset, and we mitigate claim payments under the terms of our mortgage insurance policies. Additionally, in cases where no solution is found to cure the delinquency and keep the borrower in their home, we are actively partnering with our lenders to optimize the transition process, including taking early possession of properties to mitigate claim payments. As a result of our expanded focus, there was an increase in the number of loans subject to our loss mitigation initiatives, which had a favorable impact on our results of operations.

~~Lifestyle protection insurance.~~International Protection

Growth and performance of our lifestyle protection insurance business is dependent in part on economic conditions and other factors, including consumer lending and spending levels, unemployment trends, client

account penetration and mortality and morbidity trends. Additionally, the types and mix of our products will vary based on regulatory and consumer acceptance of our products.

The profitability of our lifestyle protection insurance business ~~improved~~declined during ~~2010 and through~~ the first ~~half~~quarter of ~~2011~~2012 driven by lower new premiums, higher new claim registrations ~~from stabilizing European unemployment levels~~ and ~~the impact of our policy re-pricing and distribution contract restructuring initiatives.~~lower but still favorable claim reserve adjustments while claim payments remained at a consistent level. Premiums declined driven by lower consumer lending levels. Sales during ~~2010~~the first quarter of 2012 decreased primarily in Southern Europe, most notably in Italy, mainly as a result of stagnating economies across Europe, which resulted in a decline in consumer lending where most of our insurance coverages attach as banks tightened lending criteria and consumer demand declined. ~~Sales in the first quarter of 2011 remained consistent with the fourth quarter of 2010 levels but improved in the second quarter of 2011 as a result of signing new clients during the quarter.~~ We are ~~actively~~ pursuing various ~~growth~~targeted initiatives to ~~expand our~~increase sales in existing markets, with focus on distribution ~~channels~~expansion, selective new client acquisition and optimizing our product ~~offerings which have begun to help to mitigate lower consumer lending levels.~~portfolio. Additionally, we are looking at initiatives in select new markets such as South America and Asia. However, depending on the severity and length of these conditions, we could experience additional declines in sales ~~or the inability~~and ability to generate targeted growth in new sales.

New claim registrations ~~on unemployment-related policies declined throughout 2010 and through~~increased in the first ~~half~~quarter of 2012 from the fourth quarter of 2011 ~~and remain at~~but declined from the ~~lowest levels since the third~~first quarter of ~~2008. This, combined with stabilizing claim durations, has led~~2011. The increase from the fourth quarter of 2011 was due to a worsening economy in a number of European markets. This, coupled with lower ~~loss ratio since the second quarter of 2010 and our loss ratio has remained relatively consistent with the third quarter of 2010. The improvement~~premiums, resulted in an increase in our loss ratio ~~has been most notable~~ in the ~~Nordic~~first quarter of 2012 from the fourth quarter of 2011 and ~~Western Europe regions.~~the first quarter of 2011. We ~~expect unemployment~~could see further increases in losses if claim registrations continue to increase.

Consumer lending levels remain challenged particularly given concerns regarding the European debt crisis. Unemployment rates in Europe ~~to slowly improve over~~trended upwards slightly during the ~~next several quarters~~first quarter of 2012 with regional variation. Additionally, we ~~expect slow but positive~~experienced negative European gross domestic product growth ~~which could positively impact consumer lending demand as well as reduce claim pressures through new job creation.~~in the first quarter of 2012.

During 2010 and into 2011, significant progress was made in improving profitability through pricing, coverage or distribution contract changes on both new and eligible in-force policies. With most of these contract restructuring projects complete, weWe are focusing on ~~increasing~~supporting sales strategies through ~~improved~~expansion into select new markets, targeted product offerings and ~~expanded~~enhanced distribution ~~channels.~~capabilities. We expect these ~~strategies~~efforts, along with sound risk and cost management disciplines, to ~~continue to~~maintain or improve profitability and help to offset the impact of ~~continued high unemployment~~economic or employment pressures as well as lower levels of consumer lending.

Wealth Management

Results of our wealth management business are impacted by the demand for asset management products and related support services, investment performance and equity market conditions.

Net flows in the first quarter of 2012 were negative primarily related to the movement of a legacy block of managed accounts and from prior year relative fund performance. To partially offset this negative trend, we have introduced new investment strategies and expanded service offerings to increase the number of advisors that do business with us. Depending upon the direction of equity and fixed-income markets in the future, we could see either positive or negative impacts on sales, net flows and assets under management.

On April 2, 2012, we completed the sale of our tax and accounting financial advisor unit, Genworth Financial Investment Services (“GFIS”), for approximately $79 million, plus an earnout provision, to Cetera Financial Group. The earnout provides the opportunity for us to receive additional future compensation based on achieving certain revenue goals. We expect to recognize a realized gain of approximately $15 million related to the sale.

International Mortgage Insurance

Results of our international mortgage insurance business are affected by changes in regulatory environments, employment levels, consumer borrowing behavior, lender mortgage-related strategies, including lender servicing practices, and other economic and housing market influences, including interest rate trends, home price appreciation or depreciation, mortgage origination volume, levels of mortgage delinquencies and movements in foreign currency exchange rates.

Canada and Australia comprise approximately 98% of our international mortgage insurance primary risk in-force with an estimated average effective loan-to-value ratio of 57%. We expect that these established markets will continue to be key drivers of revenues and earnings in our international mortgage insurance business. Our participation or entry in other international markets will remain selective and disciplined.

In Canada, during 2011 and into 2012, favorable economic conditions persisted with housing affordability benefiting from low interest rates and income and employment growth. Since September 2010, the Bank of Canada has maintained the overnight rate at 1.0% and we expect this rate to be maintained near this level throughout 2012. The unemployment rate in Canada has gradually decreased during the last two years and also decreased slightly in the first quarter of 2012 from the rate at the end of 2011. We expect the unemployment rate to remain near current levels throughout 2012. Additionally, average home prices have remained stable after increasing modestly during the first half of 2011. Average home prices increased slightly during the first quarter of 2012 and we expect prices to remain stable throughout 2012 as a balanced housing market persists.

In January 2011, the Canadian government announced new mortgage rules that became effective in March and April of 2011. These changes reduced the amount of flow new insurance written in 2011 compared to 2010 levels primarily due to a smaller market, particularly for high loan-to-value refinance transactions, which was partially offset by improved market penetration. During the first quarter of 2012, flow new insurance written remained lower than the fourth quarter of 2011 primarily from a decrease in the size of the high loan-to-value market and seasonal factors, which were partially offset by a slight improvement in our market penetration. We expect our level of flow new insurance written in 2012 to increase modestly from the 2011 levels with the expectation of a stronger mortgage originations market during the second and third quarters of 2012. As of March 31, 2012, our 2010 and 2011 books of business represent 21% of our insurance in-force while our 2007 and 2008 book years, the two largest in our portfolio, together represent 28% of our insurance in-force. As our large 2007 and 2008 book years mature past their peak earnings period and subsequent smaller books season during 2012, earned premiums in Canada are expected to decline modestly in 2012 compared to 2011.

During 2011, losses in Canada increased from levels experienced during 2010 despite improving overall economic conditions and stable housing markets. While the total number of delinquencies decreased during 2011, and we continued to realize benefits from our loss mitigation activities, overall losses increased as a result of higher severity on older books, particularly from Alberta. In Alberta, the economy and housing market have not recovered to pre-recession levels, driving increased severity, although conditions began to improve during the second half of 2011. During the first quarter of 2012, losses were lower compared to the fourth quarter of 2011 as both the total number of delinquencies and the proportion of net new delinquencies from Alberta continued to decline. These improvements were partially offset by increased severity on existing delinquencies. We expect our overall loss levels in Canada to improve moderately through the remainder of 2012, although loss levels may vary quarterly based on seasonal or event-driven fluctuations.

In June 2011, the Canadian government passed legislation, that when effective, will formalize existing mortgage insurance arrangements with private mortgage insurers and terminate the existing agreement with the Canadian government, including the elimination of the Canadian government guarantee fund. This legislation does not change the current government guarantee of 90% provided on mortgages we insure. We do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business as a result of this legislation, however, a full assessment of the impact on our business cannot be completed until the regulations are finalized.

In Australia, economic growth slowed during 2011 and into 2012 given the economic impact of pressures from higher interest rates, higher costs of living, higher exchange rates and cautious consumer spending. This was particularly the case in coastal tourism areas of Queensland where these pressures were exacerbated by the flooding in January 2011. The overall housing market in Australia remained flat during the first quarter of 2012 after experiencing some modest home price declines in 2011. On a regional basis, variations were more pronounced, especially in Queensland and Western Australia where average home prices declined 6% and 4%, respectively, in 2011. We expect average national home prices to remain near current levels throughout 2012.

Unemployment levels increased slightly during 2011 and remained unchanged during the first quarter of 2012. We expect a modest increase during the remainder of 2012. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Reserve Bank of Australia lowered the cash rate from 4.75% to 4.25%, in two separate decisions, which had remained unchanged since December 2010. The Reserve Bank of Australia maintained the cash rate during the first quarter of 2012; however, effective May 2, 2012, the Reserve Bank of Australia reduced the cash rate by 50 basis points to 3.75% as Australian and global economic conditions have been somewhat weaker than expected.

Total mortgage market activity in Australia continued to slow during the first half 2011 as consumers became more cautious about higher interest rates and global economic uncertainty together with the economic impact of natural disasters. Additionally, some lenders were slow to return to the high loan-to-value market. These factors resulted in a smaller high loan-to-value mortgage originations market. During the second half of 2011, total mortgage market activity began to increase driven by first-time home buyers and higher refinance transactions reflecting modestly improving consumer confidence and stable to declining interest rates from rate decreases in the fourth quarter of 2011. During the first quarter of 2012, flow new insurance written declined modestly from the fourth quarter of 2011 primarily from a smaller mortgage originations market as a result of the expiration of certain first-time home buyer concessions offered by local governments and seasonal factors. We expect our level of flow new insurance written in 2012 to be similar to 2011 levels. As of March 31, 2012, our 2010 and 2011 books of business represented 19% of our insurance in-force while our 2007, 2008 and 2009 book years, the three largest in our portfolio, together represented 36% of our insurance in-force. We expect the pressure on our earned premiums, as the large 2007 to 2009 book years mature past their peak earnings period and subsequent smaller books season during 2012, to be largely offset by higher net premiums written based on a higher loan-to-value mix and pricing actions during the second half of 2012. Therefore, we anticipate earned premiums during 2012 to remain similar to 2011.

During 2011, losses began to increase following an improvement during 2010. This was mainly driven by higher interest rates, lower retail spending and higher reserves for claims anticipated from the natural disasters in early 2011, particularly the flooding in Queensland. As a result, there was an increase in the number of outstanding delinquencies and reserves as the cumulative impact of the factors noted previously exerted pressure on elements of the portfolio. Overall delinquencies and the delinquency rate peaked during the third quarter of 2011 and trended downward during the fourth quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012 but still remain above the level experienced at the start of 2011. This improvement was broad based across most regions, including Queensland. During the second half of 2011, we increased the intensity of our efforts to work with lenders to accelerate the processing of older delinquencies through to resolution. The extent of the rate of conversion from later stage delinquency to claim and higher average paid claim amounts during the first quarter of 2012 led to higher losses than previously anticipated. We now expect to see the higher rate of conversion to claim and average paid claims to continue for the near term. The higher losses were most pronounced in sub-segments of the Queensland region, whose economy has been pressured, as well as our 2007 and 2008 vintages which have higher concentrations of self-employed borrowers. We strengthened loss reserves by $82 million during the first quarter of 2012 to reflect the adverse change in frequency and severity experience that emerged during the current quarter. The reserve strengthening recognizes that we expect to see an elevated number of claims paid and higher average claim amounts continue into at least the second quarter of 2012 before beginning to moderate in the second half of 2012.

On April 17, 2012, we announced a new timeframe for completing our planned minority IPO of up to 40% of our Australian mortgage insurance business, which was originally expected to occur during 2012. We are now targeting completion of the IPO in early 2013, subject to market conditions, valuation considerations including business performance in Australia, and regulatory approvals. On April 20, 2012, Moody’s Investors Service placed our Australian mortgage insurance business on review for possible downgrade following our announcement regarding an anticipated net operating loss in this business in the first quarter of 2012 as a result of the elevated loss experience and higher claims incidence and severity. See “Risk Factors—A downgrade or a potential downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could result in a loss of business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations” in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 27, 2012.

During 2011 and into 2012, the overall economic environment in Europe continued to be dominated by concerns about the fiscal health of the region, which has created uncertainty about the timing and speed of economic recovery. While regional differences exist, the overall business climate and the economic growth outlook in Europe remain pressured from the combination of persistent high unemployment rates and low business and consumer confidence. As a result, we have seen increasing delinquencies and lower cures driven by prolonged economic stress, most notably in Ireland, contributing to increased loss reserves in our European mortgage insurance business, which we expect to continue through 2012. Specifically in Ireland, which represents less than 1% of our international primary risk in-force, we experienced increasing delinquencies and reserves in the second half of 2011 and during the first quarter of 2012 driven by prolonged economic and housing market stress and we expect this to continue during 2012. We are actively working with lenders and have significantly reduced our exposure and new business volumes from certain regions as we seek opportunities to manage and mitigate our risk profile in Europe.

Over the past several years, our global loss mitigation operations have enhanced both their capabilities and resources devoted to finding solutions that cure delinquencies and help to keep borrowers in their homes. These efforts include lender mortgage-related strategies, such as loan modification programs designed to help borrowers maintain mortgage payments while they are experiencing personal hardships. These programs allow lenders to maintain their relationship with a borrower while retaining an interest earning asset. In addition, we have developed asset management strategies designed to efficiently dispose of properties when a borrower’s hardship cannot be cured. Such efforts include actively partnering with the lender and borrower to optimize the transition process and taking early possession of properties to mitigate claim payments. As a result, our loss mitigation activities have had a favorable impact on our financial results as well as our relationships in the marketplace.

U.S. Mortgage Insurance

Results of our U.S. mortgage insurance business are affected by unemployment, underemployment and other economic and housing market trends, interest rates, home prices, mortgage origination volume mix and practices, the levels and aging of mortgage delinquencies including seasonal variations, the inventory of unsold homes and lender modification and other servicing efforts. These economic and housing market trends are continuing to be adversely affected by ongoing weakness in the domestic economy and related levels of unemployment and underemployment. This has resulted in ~~numerous outcomes including~~ rising foreclosures, more borrowers seeking loan modifications and elevated housing inventories which ~~place~~contributed to the downward pressure on home values. Overall, we anticipate additional declines in home values ~~during 2011 and~~through mid-2012, with a gradual increase thereafter. At the same time, we also expect unemployment and underemployment levels to stabilize at elevated levels and gradually decrease over time though remain elevated for an extended period.

~~Beginning in 2010,~~Over recent periods, the convergence of a weak housing market, tightened lending standards, the lack of consumer confidence and the lack of liquidity in some mortgage securitization markets, along with volatility in mortgage interest rates, ~~continued~~converged to drive a smaller mortgage origination market. Within the private mortgage insurance market, over recent periods the mortgage insurance penetration rate and overall market size was driven down by growth in Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) originations, associated with multiple pricing, underwriting and loan size factors, and the negative impact of GSE market fees and loan level pricing which made private mortgage insurance solutions less competitive with ~~the~~ FHA ~~solution. Given~~solutions. However, given ongoing FHA risk management actions, we ~~have seen~~saw the private mortgage insurance penetration rate increase ~~through~~slightly in the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2011, and while we expect this to continue given the additional FHA pricing changes effective in ~~April 2011.~~2011, the private mortgage insurance penetration rate slowed in the first quarter of 2012. This increase has been mitigated in part by increased GSE loan level fees which can make private mortgage insurance less attractive. Going forward, further GSE fee increases could limit the demand for or competitiveness of private mortgage insurance. Considering both of these trends, we believe the industry ~~continues to~~can expect to regain market share over time. In November 2011, federal legislation was enacted that extended the authority of the FHA to insure loans with initial balances in amounts up to 125% of median area home prices of up to and including $729,750. With this

new legislation in place, the FHA now has higher loan limits than do the GSEs in certain metropolitan statistical areas. Accordingly, this could give the FHA a competitive advantage over private mortgage insurance providers. The mortgage insurance industry level of market penetration and eventual market size will continue to be affected by any actions taken by the GSEs, the FHA or the U.S. government impacting housing or housing finance policy, underwriting standards or related reforms. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 provided for changes to, among other things, the regulatory authority and oversight of the GSEs and the authority of the FHA including with respect to premium pricing, maximum loan limits and down payment requirements. In addition, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remain the largest purchasers and guarantors of mortgage loans in the United States.

Although the overall insured market size is expected to be larger compared to the prior year, our U.S. mortgage insurance market share declined slightly in the first quarter of 2012 driven by the impact of competitor pricing and underwriting guidelines. We expect these market levels to hold through 2012. Meanwhile, we continue to manage the quality of new business through prudent underwriting guidelines, which we modify from time to time when circumstances warrant. In addition, we regularly monitor competitor pricing and underwriting changes and their potential market impact.

While we continue to experience a decrease in the level of new delinquencies, overall pressure on the housing market continues to adversely affect the performance of our portfolio, particularly our 2005, 2006, 2007 and first half of 2008 book years that we believe peaked in their delinquency development during the first quarter of 2010. Albeit at a lower rate, delinquencies for these book years continue to drive the level of new delinquencies being reported. While the impact was originally concentrated in certain states and alternative product types, during the last few years, the impact has shifted to more traditional products reflecting the elevated unemployment and underemployment levels throughout the ~~country.~~United States. Beginning mid-2010, we saw an increase in foreclosure starts as well as an increase in our paid claims as late stage delinquency loans go through foreclosure. ~~This trend~~In addition, we saw wide ranges in performance among loan servicers regarding the ability to modify loans. While these trends continued, ~~through~~both the ~~second~~levels of foreclosure starts and paid claims declined in 2011 and in the first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012 from elevated levels seen a year ago. Suspensions and delays of foreclosure actions in response to problems associated with lender and servicer foreclosure process changes and defects have caused, and could further cause, claim payments to be deferred to later periods and potentially have an adverse impact on the timing of a recovery of the U.S. residential mortgage market. Several major servicers reached agreement in principle in February 2012 with the U.S. Department of Justice, various federal agencies and 49 state attorneys general on origination and servicing practices, and this could affect timelines for claims submissions or administration actions. The effect on us of this agreement is uncertain at this time.

Expanded efforts in the mortgage lending market to modify loans and improved performance of our second half of 2008 and the 2009 and 2010 book years compared with the performance of prior book years, resulted in continued reductions in delinquency levels during the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. However, loan modification efforts remained challenged and aging of delinquencies continued to increase through ~~the remainder of 2010~~2011 and through the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2011;~~2012; moreover, both foreclosures ~~continued increasing~~ and liquidations remained elevated through the same period, thereby resulting in ~~higher~~ongoing elevated levels of loss reserves and claims. If employment levels remain pressured, home values experience further decline, credit remains tight or interest rates increase, the ability to cure a delinquent loan could be more difficult to achieve. In addition, while we continue to execute on our loan modification strategy, during 2011 and through the first ~~half~~quarter of ~~2011,~~2012, we have seen the level of loan modification actions moderating against the levels we experienced during the fourth quarter of 2010. We also saw evidence of low levels of modification activity outside of government programs and servicers distracted by various regulatory and legal actions. Further reduction of loan modifications would have an adverse impact on the ability of borrowers to cure a delinquent loan.

Our loss mitigation activities, including those relating to workouts, loan modifications, pre-sales, rescissions, claims administration (including curtailment of claim amounts) and targeted settlements, net of reinstatements, which occurred during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 resulted in a reduction of expected losses of ~~$252~~$158 million compared to ~~$450~~$122 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011.

Workouts and loan modifications, which related to loans representing 2%1% of our primary risk in-force as of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, and occurred during the period then ended, resulted in a reduction of expected losses during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 of ~~$195~~$92 million compared to ~~$267~~$94 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. Our workout and loan modification programs with various lenders and servicers are designed to help borrowers in default regain current repayment status on their mortgage loans, which ultimately allowed many of these borrowers to remain in their homes. During the first quarter of 2011, we executed a loan restructuring and modification program with some of our lender partners that resulted in reduced monthly mortgage loan repayment amounts through reductions of the underlying loans’ interest rates or debt forgiveness by lenders, or through a lengthening of the loans’ principal amortization period, or through some combination thereof. The loans that are subject to workouts and loan modifications that were completed could be subject to potential re-default by the underlying borrower at some future date. However, such borrower re-defaults currently remain stable at anticipated levels. In addition, pre-sales, claims administration and other non-cure workouts that occurred during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 resulted in a reduction of expected losses of ~~$38~~$60 million compared to ~~$28~~$17 million that occurred during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011.

As a result of investigation activities on certain insured delinquent loans, we found ~~certain~~some levels of misrepresentation and non-compliance with specific terms and conditions of our underlying master insurance policies, as well as fraud. These findings separately resulted in rescission actions that occurred during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 which reduced our expected losses at the time of rescission by ~~$19~~$6 million compared to ~~$155~~$11 million that occurred during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. We expect limited benefit from rescission actions in future periods.

~~During~~Since 2010, benefits from loss mitigation activities ~~began shifting~~have shifted from rescissions to loan modifications and reviews of loan servicing and claims administration compliance where we expect a majority of our loss mitigation benefits to be achieved going forward. While we expect to continue evaluating compliance of the insured or its loan servicer with respect to its servicing obligations under our master policy for loans insured thereunder and may curtail claim amounts payable based on our evaluations of such compliance, we cannot give assurance on the extent or level at which such claim curtailments will continue. Although loan servicers continue to pursue a wide range of approaches to execute appropriate loan modifications, government-sponsored programs such as Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) continue to decline as alternative programs have begun to gain momentum. With lower benefits from government-sponsored programs and the limited impact from alternative programs to date, we have experienced higher levels of loss reserves and/or paid claims. On February 1, 2012, the Obama Administration announced that it would extend HAMP for one year until December 31, 2013, and expand borrower eligibility by loosening certain underwriting requirements. In addition, incentives paid to the owner of a loan that qualifies for principal reduction under HAMP are being increased and, for the first time, will be offered to the GSEs. There can be no assurance that these changes will increase the number of loans that are modified under HAMP, including mortgage loans we insure currently, or that any such modifications will succeed in avoiding foreclosure. Depending upon the mix of loss mitigation activity, market trends, employment levels in future periods and other general economic impacts which influence the U.S. residential housing market, we could see additional adverse loss reserve ~~changes~~development going forward. We expect the primary source of new reserves and losses to come from new delinquencies.

We also participate in reinsurance programs in which we share portions of our premiums associated with flow insurance written on loans originated or purchased by lenders with captive insurance entities of these lenders in exchange for an agreed upon level of loss coverage above a specified attachment point. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we recorded reinsurance recoveries of ~~$66~~$14 million where cumulative losses have exceeded the attachment points in captive reinsurance arrangements, primarily related to our ~~2005, 2006, 2007 and~~2004 through 2008 book years. We have exhausted certain captive reinsurance tiers for these book years based on loss development trends. ~~Once~~While we continue to receive cash benefit from these captive arrangements at the time of claim payment, this level of benefit is expected to decline going forward as more captive ~~reinsurance or trust~~trusts’ assets are being exhausted we are responsible for additional losses incurred. We have begun to experience constraints on the recognition of captive benefit recovery due to the amount of funds held in certain captive trusts and the exhaustion of captive loss tiers for certain reinsurers. As of January 1, 2009, we no longer enter into excess loss of captive reinsurance transactions and, therefore, only participate in quota share reinsurance arrangements.at a faster rate. The majority of our excess of loss captive reinsurance arrangements are in runoff with no new books of business being added going ~~forward; however, we will continue to benefit from captive reinsurance on our 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 book years.~~forward.

market price. Brookfield will also have a right of first refusal with respect to the transfer of these common shares of Genworth Canada by the U.S. mortgage insurance companies. This transaction is undergoing customary regulatory review and is expected to be effective as of June 30, 2011, for statutory financial reporting purposes.

~~As of June 30, 2011,~~ Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation (“GEMICO”) ~~exceeded~~, our primary U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiary, continues to exceed the maximum risk-to-capital ~~requirement~~ratio of 25:1.1 established under North Carolina law and enforced

by the North Carolina Department of Insurance (“NCDOI”), which is GEMICO’s domestic insurance regulator. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, GEMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio was approximately 33.4:1 and 32.9:1, respectively. Over at least the next several quarters, we expect GEMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio to continue to increase. The amount of such increases will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses incurred by GEMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities and the amount of additional capital that is ~~authorized~~generated within the business or capital support (if any) that we provide. Our estimate of the amount and ~~continues~~timing of future losses is inherently uncertain, requires significant judgment and may change significantly over time.

Effective January 31, 2011, the NCDOI granted GEMICO a revocable two-year waiver of compliance with its risk-to-capital requirement. The waiver, which the NCDOI can modify or terminate at any time in its discretion, gives GEMICO the ability to continue to write new business in North Carolina ~~under a revocable two-year~~during the period covered by the waiver, notwithstanding that GEMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio exceeds 25:1. Thirty-four of ~~that state’s maximum 25:1~~the states in which GEMICO operates do not impose their own risk-to-capital ~~requirement limitation, which the North Carolina Department of Insurance (“NCDOI”) approved in a letter dated January 31, 2011. By extension,~~requirements; consequently, GEMICO ~~also remains authorized and continues~~is permitted to continue to write business in ~~34 additional~~those states ~~that do not have a maximum~~so long as it is permitted to write business in North Carolina. Sixteen states (including North Carolina) impose their own risk-to-capital ~~requirement. Eleven additional~~requirements. Of these 16 states, ~~have~~12 granted ~~GEMICO~~revocable waivers (or the ~~authority~~equivalent) of their risk-to-capital requirements to allow GEMICO to continue to write new business, ~~by a waiver (or other communication) regarding their relative state’s~~although two such waivers no longer were in effect as of March 31, 2012 due to the imposition of alternative risk-to-capital ~~requirements, subject~~limitations contained in these two waivers when they were granted to ~~varying terms and conditions. Consequently,~~GEMICO. Even though GEMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio exceeded 25:1, GEMICO isremains authorized to write new business in 4644 states as of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012, pursuant to revocable waivers or the equivalent issued by applicable states where necessary and with the approval of the GSEs.

New insurance written in North Carolina and in the 34 states which do not impose their own risk-to-capital requirements represented approximately 50% and 47%, respectively, of our total new insurance written for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. ~~While we continue to seek this regulatory flexibility through additional~~New insurance written in the other nine states that have granted revocable waivers (or the equivalent) of their risk-to-capital requirements represented approximately 35% and 29%, respectively, of total new insurance written for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

With the approval of state ~~waivers,~~insurance regulators in the six remaining states where ~~available, we expect to manage our capital and business operations so as to maintain capacity~~GEMICO is not authorized to write new ~~profitable business. Currently,~~business and the GSEs, we ~~utilize another one~~began writing new business through GRMAC in five of these states while continuing to use GRMIC-NC to write new business in the sixth state. Freddie Mac’s and Fannie Mae’s approvals of this arrangement expire on December 31, 2012.

We plan to write new business through GRMAC in any other state that prohibits GEMICO from writing new business, subject to the approval of applicable insurance regulators and the GSEs and GRMAC continuing to satisfy its own regulatory requirements. Depending upon volume, GRMAC currently has approximately a full year of new business capacity. We continue to discuss our ongoing use of these and other alternative arrangements with our state insurance regulators and the GSEs.

Historically, we have actively managed the risk-to-capital ratios of our U.S. mortgage insurance ~~subsidiaries, Genworth Residential Mortgage Insurance Corporation of North Carolina (“GRMIC-NC”), to write~~ business in ~~those four states where GEMICO~~various ways, including through reinsurance arrangements with our subsidiaries and by providing additional capital support to our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries (including through the contribution of a portion of our common shares of Genworth MI Canada Inc.). Our existing intercompany reinsurance arrangements are conducted through affiliated insurance subsidiaries, and therefore, remain subject to regulation by state insurance regulators who could decide to limit, or require the termination of, such arrangements. Any decision to provide additional capital to support our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries is ~~restricted under risk-to-capital requirements~~subject to a number of considerations, including (i) the extent to which we are on track towards executing certain capital reallocation transactions to support the redeployment of capital for the benefit of our stockholders while maintaining appropriate risk buffers; (ii) our ongoing analyses of risk scenarios and ~~where~~the value and return on providing such capital support or pursuing other alternative arrangements or strategies; (iii) our assessment and understanding of U.S. policy relating to housing finance, the use of private mortgage insurance or the GSEs; and (iv) our assessment of actions

by competitors and the current views of the GSEs and state regulators. Depending on the state of the U.S. economy and housing market along with other factors, there is a range of potential additional capital needs that our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries might require, including some that could be substantial. As a result, for a variety of reasons, there is no ~~waiver has been granted~~assurance that we will or will not provide additional capital to ~~date. We have also taken steps~~support our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries in the future.

In response to ~~be able to utilize another one~~the recent years’ adverse operating results, we engaged in a strategic review of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries, Genworth Residential Mortgage Assurance Corporation (“GRMAC”), for similar purposes. In this regard, Fannie Mae has approved both our use of GRMIC-NC and our request that GRMAC be recognized as an eligible insurer. We remain in ongoing consultation with our state regulators and the GSEs regarding our ongoing use of these alternative arrangements, as necessary.

~~Ratings~~

~~Following our announcement on July 20, 2011 that we strengthened reserves by approximately $300 million in~~business. While our U.S. mortgage insurance business ~~Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) lowered~~continues to write new business with expected profitable returns on an ongoing basis, we evaluated (i) the maintenance of ongoing operations and potential changes to the business as the private mortgage insurance and broader housing finance markets evolve; (ii) the prospects involved in ceasing to write new business but continuing to service the existing policies in-force (commonly referred to as “runoff”); and (iii) the merits and potential of entering into a strategic transaction involving the spinoff, merger or sale of our U.S. mortgage insurance operations. Key considerations taken into account by us in identifying and assessing alternatives included the efficiency of capital required in the short- and medium-term under each of these options; underlying embedded value within our U.S. mortgage insurance business; maximization of capital deployment flexibility; maintenance of adequate liquidity and financial ~~strength~~flexibility; protection of the value, reputation, ratings and regulatory relationships of our U.S. mortgage insurance business and Genworth as a whole; and maximization of medium- to long-term shareholder value. Each alternative we considered included challenges and opportunities from a financial, operational, reputational and regulatory perspective. We will continue to monitor these considerations and alternatives on ~~GEMICO~~a go forward basis and ~~GRMIC-NC~~our expectation currently is to ~~“BB-” from “BB+.”~~ continue operating our U.S. mortgage insurance business with the benefit of regulatory waivers and the use of alternative subsidiaries to generate new insurance written.

Runoff

Results of our Runoff segment are affected by investment performance, interest rate levels, net interest spreads, equity market conditions, mortality and policyholder surrenders and scheduled maturities. In addition, the results of our Runoff segment can significantly impact our results, regulatory capital requirements, distributable earnings and liquidity.

In January 2011, we discontinued sales of our individual and group variable annuities; however, we continue to service our existing block of business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts. During 2012, improved equity market performance favorably impacted the results of our variable annuity products and regulatory capital requirements. In the future, equity market performance and volatility could result in additional gains or losses in our variable annuity products although associated hedging activities are expected to mitigate most of these impacts. Volatility in the results of our variable annuity products can result in favorable or unfavorable impacts on capital and earnings. In addition to the use of hedging activities to mitigate impacts related to equity market volatility and interest rate risks, we may pursue reinsurance opportunities to further mitigate volatility in results.

The ~~“BB” range is~~results of our institutional products are impacted by scheduled maturities, as well as liquidity levels. However, we believe our liquidity planning and our asset-liability management will largely mitigate this risk.

Effective October 1, 2011, we completed the ~~fifth-highest~~sale of ~~nine financial strength rating ranges assigned~~our Medicare supplement insurance business for $276 million. We recognized an after-tax gain on the sale of $20 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. The transaction included the sale of Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, Tennessee and its subsidiary, American Continental Insurance Company, and the reinsurance of the Medicare supplement insurance in-force business written by ~~S&P, which range from “AAA”~~other Genworth life insurance subsidiaries.

We expect to ~~“R.” A plus (+) or minus (-) shows relative standing in a rating category. Accordingly,~~manage our runoff products for at least the ~~“BB-” rating is~~next ten years. Several factors may impact the ~~thirteenth-highest of S&P’s 21 ratings categories.~~time period for these products to runoff including the specific policy types, economic conditions and management strategies.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations and should be read in conjunction with “—Business trends and conditions.” For a discussion of our segment results, see “—Results of Operations and Selected Financial and Operating Performance Measures by Segment.”

Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended March 31,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2011 vs. 2010					2012		2011			2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1,455		$	1,470		$	(15	)	(1	)%	$	1,107	$	1,437		$	(330	)	(23	)%
Net investment income		881			823			58		7	%		832		830			2		—	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(40	)		(139	)		99		71	%		35		(28	)		63		NM	⁽¹⁾
Insurance and investment product fees and other		359			256			103		40	%		452		329			123		37	%

Total revenues		2,655			2,410			245		10	%		2,426		2,568			(142	)	(6	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1,672			1,340			332		25	%		1,232		1,413			(181	)	(13	)%
Interest credited		204			211			(7	)	(3	)%		195		201			(6	)	(3	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		514			499			15		3	%		530		563			(33	)	(6	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		197			179			18		10	%		272		151			121		80	%
Interest expense		134			109			25		23	%		95		127			(32	)	(25	)%

Total benefits and expenses		2,721			2,338			383		16	%		2,324		2,455			(131	)	(5	)%

Income (loss) before income taxes		(66	)		72			(138	)	(192	)%
Benefit for income taxes		(6	)		(5	)		(1	)	(20	)%
Income before income taxes													102		113			(11	)	(10	)%
Provision for income taxes													22		20			2		10	%

Net income (loss)		(60	)		77			(137	)	(178	)%
Net income													80		93			(13	)	(14	)%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		36			35			1		3	%		33		34			(1	)	(3	)%

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(96	)	$	42		$	(138	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc’s common stockholders												$	47	$	59		$	(12	)	(20	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Premiums.Premiums consist primarily of premiums earned on insurance products for life, long-term care and Medicare supplement insurance, single premium immediate annuities and structured settlements with life contingencies, lifestyle protection insurance and mortgage insurance.

Our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $190 million primarily related to a decrease of $233 million in our life insurance business from higher ceded reinsurance on certain term life insurance policies under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction in the current year. This decrease was ~~flat as a $22 million increase in~~partially offset by growth of our long-term care insurance business ~~was offset by a $12 million decrease~~from new sales and in-force rate actions. Our fixed annuities business increased from higher sales of our life-contingent products in ~~our retirement income business and a $10 million decrease in our life insurance business.~~the current year.

Our International Protection segment decreased $4$36 million, asincluding a ~~result~~decrease of a $21 million decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business, partially offset by a $17 million increase in our international mortgage insurance business. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $44$4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange, ~~rates.~~primarily due to lower premium volume driven by reduced levels of consumer lending and our runoff block of business. The current year also included an unfavorable adjustment of $4 million related to a German premium tax.

Our Runoff segment decreased $84 million driven by the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Our International Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $15 million, including an increase of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange. Premiums decreased as a result of seasoning of our in-force blocks of business in Canada, Australia and Europe, partially offset by lower ceded reinsurance premiums in Australia.

Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment decreased ~~$11 million.~~$5 million largely related to lower insurance in-force and lower assumed affiliated premiums, partially offset by benefits associated with our previously implemented rate increases.

Net investment income. Net investment income represents the income earned on our investments.

Weighted-average investment yields ~~increased to 5.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from~~were 4.8% for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2012 and 2011. The ~~increase in~~ weighted-average investment yields ~~was primarily attributable to the~~remained unchanged as higher average invested assets in longer duration products and improved ~~performance of~~yields on limited partnerships ~~accounted for under the equity method and $16 million of bond calls and prepayments in the current year.~~were offset by lower reinvestment yields. Net investment income for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 included $7$6 million of higher gains related to limited ~~partnerships compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.~~partnerships.

~~The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $13 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates in our International segment.~~

Net investment gains (losses).Net investment gains (losses) consist of realized gains and losses from the sale or impairment of our investments and unrealized and realized gains and losses from our trading securities and derivative instruments. For further discussion of the change in net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Investments and Derivative Instruments.”

We recorded ~~$26~~$17 million of net other-than-temporary impairments for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 as compared to ~~$51~~$36 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. Of total impairments for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010, $17~~$15 million and ~~$43~~$21 million, respectively, related to structured securities, including $9$8 million and ~~$23~~$15 million, respectively, related to sub-prime and Alt-A residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Impairments related to corporate securities as a result of bankruptcies, receivership or concerns about the issuer’s ability to continue to make contractual payments or where we have intent to sell were $14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011 and 2010,~~March 31, 2012, we also recorded $4$2 million ~~and $5 million, respectively,~~ of impairments related to commercial mortgage loans and $2 million and $4 million, respectively, of impairments related to limited partnership investments. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we also recorded $3 million of impairments related to real estate held-for-investment.loans.

Net investment ~~losses~~gains related to derivatives of ~~$15~~$26 million ~~for~~during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 were primarily due to $16 million of losses from the change in value of the embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the change in value of the derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities associated with ~~our~~credit default swaps and embedded derivatives related to variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum withdrawal ~~benefits~~benefit (“~~GMWBs”~~GMWB”) riders. The GMWB gains were primarily due to the policyholder funds outperforming the benchmark indices used for hedging. Additionally, there were gains from the narrowing of credit spreads associated with credit default swaps where we sold protection to improve diversification and ~~$4 million of~~portfolio yield. These gains were partially offset by losses associated with derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk associated with near-term expected dividend payments and other cash flows from certain subsidiaries and to mitigate foreign subsidiary macroeconomic risk. ~~These~~In addition, there were losses attributable to increases in long-term interest rates that that were ~~partially offset by $3 million of gains~~ related to a non-qualified derivative strategy to mitigate ~~the~~ interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position and $2 million of gains in other non-qualified interest rate swaps. Net investment losses related to derivatives of $38 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were primarily related to $31 million of losses from the change in value of our credit default swaps due to widening credit spreads, $21 million of losses from the change in value of the embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the change in value of the derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs and $9 million of losses related to a derivative strategy to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position. These losses were partially offset by $15 million ofas well as hedge ineffectiveness ~~gains~~ from our cash flow hedge programs related to our long-term care insurance ~~business, $4~~business. Net investment losses related to derivatives of $10 million during the three months end March 31, 2011 were primarily related to losses associated with derivative instruments used to hedge foreign currency risk and GMWB losses primarily attributed to underperformance of the underlying variable annuity funds as compared to market indices and market losses resulting from increased volatility. These losses were partially offset by gains from ~~other non-qualified interest rate~~credit default swaps ~~$2 million of~~due to narrowing credit spreads and gains related to ~~embedded derivatives~~a derivative strategy to mitigate interest rate risk associated with ~~certain reinsurance agreements and $2 million of gains from foreign currency options and forward contracts.~~our statutory capital position.

Net ~~losses~~gains related to the sale of available-for-sale securities were ~~$9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net gains of~~ $17 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2012 compared to net losses of $2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011. We recorded ~~$14~~net losses of $25 million ~~of net gains~~ related to trading securities during the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 compared to net gains of $11 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011. We recorded ~~$42~~$24 million of ~~lower~~higher net ~~losses~~gains related to securitization entities during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 primarily associated with lower losses related to derivatives. We also recorded $2 million of gains related to commercial mortgage loans during the three months ended June 30, 2011 attributable to a decrease in the allowance compared to $18 million of losses during the three months ended June 30, 2010 from a lower of cost or market adjustment on loans held-for-sale and an increase in the allowance.

ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily associated with derivatives. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we also recorded a $2 million purchase price valuation adjustment related to the purchase of Altegris Capital, LLC (“Altegris”) in 2010.

Insurance and investment product fees and other. Insurance and investment product fees and other consist primarily of fees assessed against policyholder and contractholder account values, surrender charges, cost of insurance assessed on universal and term universal life insurance policies, advisory and administration service fees assessed on investment contractholder account values, broker/dealer commission revenues and other fees.

Our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment increased ~~$88~~$117 million ~~largely~~mainly driven by ~~a $61 million increase in~~ our life insurance business related to $88 million of gains on the repurchase of notes secured by our non-recourse funding obligations related to a ~~$25 million~~life block sale transaction in the current year and growth of our term universal life insurance product. The increase ~~in our wealth management business and a $4 million increase in our retirement income business.~~

Our International segment increased $10 million primarily as a result of an increase of $6 million in our international mortgage insurance business and an increase of $4 million in our lifestyle protection insurance business. The three months ended June 30, 2011 did not include a changewas also attributable to ~~changes~~growth of our universal life insurance products, partially offset by an unfavorable valuation adjustment in ~~foreign exchange rates.~~the current year.

Corporate and Other activities increased ~~$4 million.~~$14 million primarily attributable to higher income related to our reverse mortgage business.

Our Runoff segment decreased $7 million mainly associated with lower average account values of our variable annuity products in the current year.

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves. Benefits and other changes in policy reserves consist primarily of benefits paid and reserve activity related to current claims and future policy benefits on insurance and investment products for life, long-term care and Medicare supplement insurance, structured settlements and single premium immediate annuities with life contingencies, lifestyle protection insurance and claim costs incurred related to mortgage insurance products.

Our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment ~~increased $43~~decreased $129 million primarily attributable to a ~~$62~~decrease of $197 million ~~increase in our long-term care insurance business and a $7 million increase~~ in our life insurance business principally related to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $209 million of certain term life insurance reserves under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction. This decrease was partially offset by growth in our term universal life insurance product and less favorable mortality in our term and term universal life insurance products compared to the prior year. Our long-term care insurance business increased $58 million from the aging and growth of our in-force block and higher claims and lower termination rates on older issued policies. Also included in the increase in the current year was a reclassification of loss adjustment expenses of $11 million from acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and an $11 million increase in reserves associated with a methodology change related to pending claims. These increases were partially offset by a ~~$26 million decrease in our retirement income business.~~

~~Our International segment decreased $21 million primarily as a result~~favorable actuarial adjustment of ~~a decrease of $22~~$16 million in ~~our lifestyle protection insurance~~the current year related to a multi-stage system conversion. Our fixed annuities business ~~partially offset by an increase of $1~~increased $10 million ~~in our international mortgage insurance business. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $13 million~~largely attributable to ~~changes~~higher sales of our life-contingent products in ~~foreign exchange rates.~~the current year.

Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $82 million mainly from a decrease in change in reserves primarily driven by improved cures and lower new delinquencies. Net paid claims increased ~~$310 million.~~principally related to continued aging of the delinquency inventory and a significant reduction in ceded claims under captive arrangements, coupled with a lender portfolio settlement in the current year.

Our Runoff segment decreased $77 million principally from the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011 and a decrease in our guaranteed minimum death benefits (“GMDBs”) in our variable annuity products due to favorable equity market impacts in the current year.

Our International Mortgage Insurance segment increased $98 million, including an increase of $6 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange. Australia increased $96 million as a result of a reserve strengthening of $82 million in the current year due to higher than anticipated frequency and severity of claims paid from later stage delinquencies from prior years, particularly in coastal tourism areas of Queensland as a result of regional economic pressures as well as our 2007 and 2008 vintages which have a higher concentration of self-employed borrowers. The adverse change in claims paid in

the current year resulted in increased frequency and severity assumptions for our remaining portfolio of delinquent loans in Australia. In Canada, losses decreased primarily driven by lower delinquencies and paid claims due to a shift in regional mix with fewer claims from Alberta, as well as higher benefits from loss mitigation activities. Other Countries increased primarily from higher new delinquencies and continued aging of existing delinquencies, particularly in Ireland, partially offset by benefits from ongoing loss mitigation activities.

Our International Protection segment increased $9 million, including a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange, primarily driven by lower favorable claim reserve adjustments in the current year. In addition, we reclassified loss adjustment expenses of $3 million from acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, in the current year.

Interest credited. Interest credited represents interest credited on behalf of policyholder and contractholder general account balances.

~~Our Retirement and Protection~~ The decrease was predominately related to a decrease of $4 million in our U.S. Life Insurance segment ~~decreased $3 million~~ primarily attributable to ~~a $10 million decrease in~~lower crediting rates on our ~~retirement income business, partially offset by an $8 million increase in our life insurance business.~~fixed annuities.

~~Corporate and Other activities decreased $4 million.~~

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, represent costs and expenses related to the acquisition and ongoing maintenance of insurance and investment contracts, including commissions, policy issuance expenses and other underwriting and general operating costs. These costs and expenses are net of amounts that are capitalized and deferred, which are ~~primarily~~ costs and expenses that ~~vary with and~~ are ~~primarily~~ related directly to the ~~sale and issuance~~successful acquisition of ~~our~~new or renewal insurance policies and investment contracts, such as first-year commissions in excess of ultimate renewal commissions and other policy issuance expenses.

Our ~~Retirement~~Runoff segment decreased $27 million principally from a $9 million charge from the discontinuance of our variable annuity offerings in the prior year that did not recur and ~~Protection segment increased $22 million primarily attributable to a $20 million increase~~the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in ~~our wealth management business and a $2 million increase in our life insurance business.~~the fourth quarter of 2011.

Our International Protection segment ~~was flat as~~decreased $25 million, including a ~~$6 million~~ decrease ~~in our lifestyle protection insurance business was offset by an increase~~ of ~~$6 million in our international mortgage insurance business. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $17~~$3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange, ~~rates.~~as a result of lower paid commissions from a decline in new business and lower professional fees. In addition, we reclassified loss adjustment expenses of $3 million to benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the current year.

Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $5 million related to lower operating expenses as a result of a cost–saving initiative in 2011.

Our U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $3 million primarily attributable to a $6 million decrease in our long-term care insurance business from a reclassification of loss adjustment expenses of $11 million to benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the current year, partially offset by growth of our in-force block. Our fixed annuities business decreased $6 million primarily related to a favorable adjustment of $4 million associated with guarantee funds in the current year compared to a $4 million accrual related to guarantee funds in the prior year. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in our life insurance business of $9 million from a $13 million favorable cumulative impact from a change in premium taxes in Virginia in the prior year that did not recur and from growth of our term universal life insurance product.

Corporate and Other activities ~~decreased $9 million.~~increased $28 million as a result of higher unallocated expenses to our operating segments in the current year and lower overall expenses in the prior year. There was also an increase of $14 million associated with our reverse mortgage business primarily related to broker commissions on loans.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles. Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles consists primarily of the amortization of acquisition costs that are capitalized, present value of future profits and capitalized software.

Our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment increased ~~$14~~$147 million ~~primarily attributable to a $16 million~~principally from an increase ~~in our retirement income business, partially offset by a $2 million decrease~~ in our life insurance ~~business.~~business of $139 million largely related to higher ceded reinsurance as we wrote off $142 million of deferred acquisition costs associated with certain term life insurance policies under a new

reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction in the current year. Higher amortization was also attributable to our universal life insurance products due to growth, partially offset by lower lapses in our term life insurance products. Our fixed annuities business increased $6 million primarily from higher amortization of deferred acquisition costs attributable to higher net investment gains in the current year, partially offset by lower surrenders in the current year.

Our Runoff segment decreased $20 million largely related to our variable annuity products from favorable equity market impacts and a $4 million favorable unlocking in the current year driven by lower surrenders. The decrease was also attributable to the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Our International Protection segment ~~increased~~decreased $5 million ~~primarily related to~~mainly as a $3 million increase in our lifestyle protection insurance business and a $2 million increase in our international mortgage insurance business. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increaseresult of ~~$5 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~lower premium volume.

Interest expense. Interest expense represents interest related to our borrowings that are incurred at our holding company or subsidiary level and our non-recourse funding obligations and interest expense related to certain reinsurance arrangements being accounted for as deposits.

Corporate and Other activities decreased $20 million primarily attributable to a favorable adjustment of $20 million in the current year related to the Tax Matters Agreement with our former parent company and the maturity of our ¥57.0 billion of senior notes in June 2011, partially offset by the debt issuance in March 2011.

Our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment decreased $3$14 million related to our life insurance ~~business.~~business primarily from a favorable adjustment of $20 million in the current year related to the Tax Matters Agreement with our former parent company. This decrease was partially offset by the write-off of $8 million in deferred borrowing costs from the repurchase and repayment of non-recourse funding obligations associated with a life block sale transaction in the current year.

Our International Mortgage Insurance segment increased ~~$12~~$4 million ~~driven~~from the issuance of debt by ~~an increase of $6 million in each of~~ our ~~international~~wholly-owned Australian mortgage insurance ~~and our lifestyle protection insurance businesses. The three months ended~~subsidiary in June ~~30, 2011 included an increase of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Corporate and other activities increased $16 million.~~2011.

~~Benefit~~Provision for income taxes.The effective tax rate increased to ~~9.1%~~21.6% for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 from ~~(6.9)%~~17.7% for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. This increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to ~~higher taxes~~lower taxed foreign income and tax favored investments, partially offset by changes in uncertain tax benefits in the current ~~year as a result of a Canadian legislative change as compared to an Australian tax legislative benefit in the prior~~ year. The Canadian legislation change passed in June 2011 will eliminate the Canadian government guarantee fund. The elimination of the guarantee fund is expected to increase the effective tax rate on our U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) earnings as prior deductions for contributions to the fund lowered the effective tax rate on U.S. GAAP earnings. The three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 included ~~an increase~~a decrease of $4$1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of income in a subsidiary attributable to third parties. ~~The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

Net income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders. ~~We reported a net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in the current year compared to net~~Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders decreased in the current year compared to the prior year primarily related to a ~~higher~~$41 million net ~~operating~~ loss related to a life block sale transaction completed by our life insurance business and a reserve strengthening in our ~~U.S.~~Australian mortgage insurance business ~~largely related to the reserve strengthening during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and additional tax benefits recognized~~ in the ~~prior~~current year. These decreases were partially offset by ~~higher product fee income~~lower losses in our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment and an increase in our variable annuities from improved ~~investment~~equity market performance in the current year. For a discussion of each of our ~~Retirement and Protection, International and U.S. Mortgage Insurance~~ segments and Corporate and Other activities, see the “—Results of Operations and Selected Financial and Operating Performance Measures by Segment.” Included in ~~the~~ net ~~loss~~income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was ~~an increase of $14 million, net of tax, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated:~~

   Six months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 2,892    $ 2,940    $ (48 ) (2 )%
Net investment income
   1,711    1,588    123    8 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   (68 ) (209 ) 141    67 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   688    512    176    34 %

Total revenues
   5,223    4,831    392    8 %

Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   3,081    2,655    426    16 %
Interest credited
   405    424    (19 ) (4 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   1,014    974    40    4 %
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   382    363    19    5 %
Interest expense
   261    224    37    17 %

Total benefits and expenses
   5,143    4,640    503    11 %

Income before income taxes
   80    191    (111 ) (58 )%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
   24    (98 ) 122    124 %

Net income
   56    289    (233 ) (81 )%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
   70    69    1    1 %

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ (14 ) $ 220    $ (234 ) (106 )%

~~Premiums~~

Our Retirement and Protection segment decreased $6 million primarily related to a $28 million decrease in our retirement income business and a $17 million decrease in our life insurance business, partially offset by an increase of $39 million in our long-term care insurance business.

Our International segment decreased $31 million as a result of a decrease of $64 million in our lifestyle protection insurance business, partially offset by an increase of $33 million in our international mortgage insurance business. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $54 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $11 million.~~

~~Net investment income~~

Weighted-average investment yields increased to 5.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 4.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in weighted-average investment yields was primarily attributable to improved performance of limited partnerships and $20 million of higher bond calls and prepayments in the current year. Net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included $21 million of gains related to limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method as compared to $24 million of losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

~~The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $18 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates in our International segment.~~

~~Net investment gains (losses).~~~~For further discussion of the change in net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Investments and Derivative Instruments.”~~

We recorded $62 million of net other-than-temporary impairments for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $131 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Of total impairments for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, $38 million and $105 million, respectively, related to structured securities, including $24 million and $59 million, respectively, related to sub-prime and Alt-A residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Impairments related to corporate securities as a result of bankruptcies, receivership or concerns about the issuer’s ability to continue to make contractual payments or where we have intent to sell were $14 million and $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded $5 million of impairments related to commercial mortgage loans and $2 million and $10 million, respectively, of impairments related to limited partnership investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we also recorded $3 million of impairments related to real estate held-for-investment. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we also recorded $6 million of impairments related to financial hybrid securities.

Net investment losses related to derivatives of $25 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were primarily due to $20 million of losses from the change in value of derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the gains in value of the embedded derivative liabilities associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs and $13 million of losses associated with derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk. These losses were partially offset by $5 million of gains related to a derivative strategy to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position and $3 million of gains in other non-qualified interest rate swaps. Net investment losses related to derivatives of $46 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were primarily related to $35 million of losses from the change in value of the embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the change in value of the derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs, $27 million of losses from the change in value of our credit default swaps due to widening credit spreads and $6 million of losses related to a derivative strategy to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position. These losses were partially offset by $13 million of ineffectiveness gains from our cash flow hedge programs related to our long-term care insurance business, $7 million of gains from other non-qualified interest rate swaps and $2 million of gains related to embedded derivatives associated with certain reinsurance agreements.

Net losses related to the sale of available-for-sale securities were $11 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net gains of $2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. We recorded $23 million of higher gains related to trading securities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. We recorded $5 million of net gains related to securitization entities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily related to gains on trading securities compared to $36 million of net losses during the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily associated with derivatives. We also recorded $1 million of gains related to commercial mortgage loans during the six months ended June 30, 2011 attributable to a decrease in the allowance compared to $22 million of losses during the six months ended June 30, 2010 from a lower of cost or market adjustment on loans held-for-sale and an increase in the allowance. There was also a net gain of $16 million from the recovery of a counterparty receivable in 2010.

~~Insurance and investment product fees and other~~

Our Retirement and Protection segment increased $166 million largely driven by an increase of $100 million in our life insurance business, an increase of $54 million in our wealth management business and an increase of $12 million in our retirement income business.

~~Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment decreased $3 million.~~

~~Corporate and Other activities increased $3 million.~~

~~Benefits and other changes in policy reserves~~

Our Retirement and Protection segment increased $87 million primarily attributable to a $96 million increase in our long-term care insurance business and a $37 million increase in our life insurance business, partially offset by a $46 million decrease in our retirement income business.

Our International segment decreased $54 million as a result of a decrease of $58 million in our lifestyle protection insurance business, partially offset by an increase of $4 million in our international mortgage insurance business. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $19 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment increased $393 million.~~

~~Interest credited~~

Our Retirement and Protection segment decreased $9 million primarily attributable to an $18 million decrease in our retirement income business, partially offset by an $11 million increase in our life insurance business.

~~Corporate and Other activities decreased $10 million.~~

~~Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals~~

Our Retirement and Protection segment increased $65 million primarily attributable to a $46 million increase in our wealth management business, a $13 million increase in our retirement income business and a $12 million increase in our long-term care insurance business, partially offset by a $6 million decrease in our life insurance business.

Our International segment decreased $5 million related to a $12 million decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business, partially offset by a $7 million increase in our international mortgage insurance business. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $15 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Corporate and Other activities decreased $22 million.~~

~~Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles~~

Our Retirement and Protection segment increased $20 million primarily attributable to a $34 million increase in our retirement income business, partially offset by a $9 million decrease in our life insurance business and a $5 million decrease in our long-term care insurance business.

Our International segment was flat as a $7 million decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was offset by a $7 million increase in our international mortgage insurance business. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $6 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Interest expense~~

~~Our International segment increased $8 million related to a $12 million increase in our international mortgage insurance business, partially offset by~~ a decrease of $4 million, ~~in our lifestyle protection insurance business. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Corporate and other activities increased $28 million.~~

~~Provision (benefit) for income taxes~~. The effective tax rate increased to 30.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from (51.3)% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase in the effective tax rate was attributable to changes in uncertain tax benefits in the prior year related to our separation from our former parent and higher taxes in the current year as a result of a Canadian legislative change as compared to an Australian tax legislative benefit in the prior year. The Canadian legislation change passed in June 2011 will eliminate the Canadian government guarantee fund. The elimination of the guarantee fund is expected to increase the effective tax rate on our U.S. GAAP earnings as prior deductions for contributions to the fund lowered the effective tax rate on U.S. GAAP earnings. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $7 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests~~~~. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders.~~ We reported a net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in the current year compared to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in the prior year primarily related to a higher loss in our U.S. mortgage insurance business largely related to the reserve strengthening in the current year and additional tax benefits recognized in the prior year. These decreases were partially offset by higher product fee income and improved investment performance in the current year. For a discussion of our Retirement and Protection, International and U.S. Mortgage Insurance segments and Corporate and Other activities, see the “—Results of Operations and Selected Financial and Operating Performance Measures by Segment.” Included in the net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was an increase of $20 million, net of ~~tax,~~taxes, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Reconciliation of net income ~~(loss)~~ to net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

~~The net~~Net operating ~~loss~~income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 was $74 million compared to net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders of $118 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $24$31 million and ~~$232~~$75 million, respectively. We define net operating income ~~(loss)~~

available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders as income (loss) from continuing operations excluding net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, after-tax net investment gains (losses) and other adjustments and infrequent or unusual non-operating items. We exclude net investment gains (losses) and infrequent or unusual non-operating items because we do not consider them to be related to the operating performance of our segments and Corporate and Other activities. A component of our net investment gains (losses) is the result of impairments, the size and timing of which can vary significantly depending on market credit cycles. In addition, the size and timing of other investment gains (losses) can be subject to our discretion and are influenced by market opportunities, as well as asset-liability matching considerations. Infrequent or unusual non-operating items are also excluded from net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders if, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends. There were no infrequent or unusual non-operating items excluded from net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders during the periods ~~presented other than a $106 million tax benefit related to separation from our former parent recorded in the first quarter of 2010.~~presented.

While some of these items may be significant components of net income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we believe that net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and measures that are derived from or incorporate net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders, including net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share on a basic and diluted basis, are appropriate measures that are useful to investors because they identify the income (loss) attributable to the ongoing operations of the business. However, net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to

Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share on a basic and diluted basis are not substitutes for net income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders or net income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share on a basic and diluted basis determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, our definition of net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders may differ from the definitions used by other companies.

The following table includes a reconciliation of net income ~~(loss)~~ to net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30,    Six months ended
June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
       2011         2010            2011         2010
Net income (loss)
   $ (60 ) $ 77       $ 56    $ 289
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
   36    35       70    69




Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   (96 ) 42       (14 ) 220
Adjustments to net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   22    76       38    118
Net tax benefit related to separation from our former parent
   —      —         —      (106 )




Net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ (74 ) $ 118       $ 24    $ 232


	Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
Net income	$	80			93
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		33			34

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		47			59
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		(16	)		16

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	31		$	75

Earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share

The following table provides basic and diluted net income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders and net operating income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30,    Six months ended
June 30,
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)
       2011         2010            2011         2010
Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:

Basic
   $ (0.20 ) $ 0.09       $ (0.03 ) $ 0.45




Diluted
   $ (0.20 ) $ 0.08       $ (0.03 ) $ 0.45




Net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:

Basic
   $ (0.15 ) $ 0.24       $ 0.05    $ 0.47




Diluted
   $ (0.15 ) $ 0.24       $ 0.05    $ 0.47




Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

Basic
   490.6    489.1       490.4    489.0




Diluted⁽¹⁾
   490.6    494.2       490.4    493.9

⁽¹⁾

   Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions, except per share amounts)
           2012                    2011
Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:

Basic
   $ 0.09       $ 0.12




Diluted
   $ 0.09       $ 0.12




Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders per common share:

Basic
   $ 0.06       $ 0.15




Diluted
   $ 0.06       $ 0.15




Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

Basic
   491.2       490.1




Diluted
   495.7       494.4

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding ~~in 2010~~ reflect the effects of potentially dilutive securities including stock options, restricted stock units and other equity-based compensation.

Results of Operations and Selected Financial and Operating Performance Measures by Segment

Our chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance and allocates resources on the basis of net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders. See note 109 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for a reconciliation of net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders of our segments and Corporate and Other activities to net income ~~(loss)~~ available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders.

Management’s discussion and analysis by segment also contains selected operating performance measures including “sales,” “assets under management” and “insurance in-force” or “risk in-force” which are commonly used in the insurance and investment industries as measures of operating performance.

Management regularly monitors and reports sales metrics as a measure of volume of new and renewal business generated in a period. Sales refer to: (1) annualized first-year premiums for term life and long-term care ~~and Medicare supplement~~ insurance; (2) ~~new and additional premiums/~~annualized first-year deposits plus 5% of excess deposits for universal and term universal life insurance ~~linked-benefits, spread-based and variable~~ products; (3) 10% of premium deposits for linked-benefits products; (4) new and additional premiums/deposits for fixed annuities; (5) gross flows and net flows, which represent gross flows less redemptions, for our wealth management business; ~~(4)~~(6) written premiums and deposits, gross of ceded reinsurance and cancellations, and premium equivalents, where we earn a fee for administrative services only business, for our lifestyle protection insurance business; ~~(5)~~and (7) new insurance written for mortgage ~~insurance; and (6) written premiums, net of cancellations, for our Mexican insurance operations, which in each case reflects the amount of business we generated during each period presented.~~insurance. Sales do not include renewal premiums on policies or contracts written during prior periods. We consider annualized first-year premiums, premium equivalents, new premiums/deposits, gross and net flows, written premiums ~~premium equivalents~~ and new insurance written to be a measure of our operating performance because they represent a measure of new sales of insurance policies or contracts during a specified period, rather than a measure of our revenues or profitability during that period.

Management regularly monitors and reports assets under management for our wealth management business, insurance in-force and risk in-force. Assets under management for our wealth management business represent third-party assets under management that are not consolidated in our financial statements. Insurance in-force for our life, international mortgage and U.S. mortgage insurance businesses is a measure of the aggregate face value

of outstanding insurance policies as of the respective reporting date. For our risk in-force in our international mortgage insurance business, we have computed an “effective” risk in-force amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor of 35% that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our businesses in Canada ~~Australia~~ and ~~New Zealand.~~Australia. Risk in-force for our U.S. mortgage insurance business is our obligation that is limited under contractual terms to the amounts less than 100% of the mortgage loan value. We consider assets under management for our wealth management business, insurance in-force and risk in-force to be a measure of our operating performance because they represent a measure of the size of our business at a specific date which will generate revenues and profits in a future period, rather than a measure of our revenues or profitability during that period.

We also include information related to loss mitigation activities for our U.S. mortgage insurance business. We define loss mitigation activities as rescissions, cancellations, borrower loan modifications, repayment plans, lender- and borrower-titled pre-sales, claims ~~curtailment~~administration and other loan ~~workouts and claim mitigation actions.~~workouts. Estimated savings related to rescissions are the reduction in carried loss reserves, net of premium refunds and reinstatement of prior rescissions. Estimated savings related to loan modifications and other cure related loss mitigation actions represent the reduction in carried loss reserves. For non-cure related actions, including pre-sales, the estimated savings represent the difference between the full claim obligation and the actual amount paid. We believe that this

information helps to enhance the understanding of the operating performance of our U.S. mortgage insurance business as ~~they~~loss mitigation activities specifically impact current and future loss reserves and level of claim payments.

These operating measures enable us to compare our operating performance across periods without regard to revenues or profitability related to policies or contracts sold in prior periods or from investments or other sources.

The following discussions of our segment results of operations should be read in conjunction with the “—Business trends and conditions.”

~~Retirement~~Insurance and ~~Protection~~Wealth Management Division

Division results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Insurance and Wealth Management Division. See below for a discussion by segment.


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Net operating income available to Genworth
Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
U.S. Life Insurance segment:
Life insurance	$	6		$	42		$	(36	)	(86	)%
Long-term care insurance		35			36			(1	)	(3	)%
Fixed annuities		23			14			9		64	%

U.S. Life Insurance segment		64			92			(28	)	(30	)%

International Protection segment		5			25			(20	)	(80	)%

Wealth Management segment		12			10			2		20	%

Total net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		81			127			(46	)	(36	)%
Adjustment to net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments		(5	)		(10	)		5		(50	)%

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	76		$	117		$	(41	)	(35	)%

U.S. Life Insurance segment

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 822    $ 822    $ —      —   %
Net investment income
   660    630    30    5 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   (46 ) (69 ) 23    33 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   348    260    88    34 %

Total revenues
   1,784    1,643    141    9 %

Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   1,004    961    43    4 %
Interest credited
   173    176    (3 ) (2 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   274    252    22    9 %
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   118    104    14    13 %
Interest expense
   26    29    (3 ) (10 )%

Total benefits and expenses
   1,595    1,522    73    5 %

Income before income taxes
   189    121    68    56 %
Provision for income taxes
   66    40    26    65 %

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   123    81    42    52 %
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   26    33    (7 ) (21 )%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 149    $ 114    $ 35    31 %

   Three months ended
March 31, Increase
(decrease)
and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2012 2011 2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 543    $ 733    $ (190 ) (26 )%
Net investment income
   638    621    17    3 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   (2 ) (21 ) 19    90 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   263    146    117    80 %


Total revenues
   1,442    1,479    (37 ) (3 )%


Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   786    915    (129 ) (14 )%
Interest credited
   162    166    (4 ) (2 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   169    172    (3 ) (2 )%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   223    76    147    193 %
Interest expense
   12    26    (14 ) (54 )%


Total benefits and expenses
   1,352    1,355    (3 ) —   %


Income before income taxes
   90    124    (34 ) (27 )%
Provision for income taxes
   32    44    (12 ) (27 )%


Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc’s common stockholders
   58    80    (22 ) (28 )%
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   6    12    (6 ) (50 )%


Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 64    $ 92    $ (28 ) (30 )%

The following table sets forth net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the businesses included in our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2011		2010		2011 vs. 2010					2012		2011		2012 vs. 2011
Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Life insurance	$	72	$	32	$	40		125	%	$	6	$	42	$	(36	)	(86	)%
Long-term care insurance		31		47		(16	)	(34	)%		35		36		(1	)	(3	)%
Wealth management		13		10		3		30	%
Retirement income		33		25		8		32	%
Fixed annuities											23		14		9		64	%

Total net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	149	$	114	$	35		31	%	$	64	$	92	$	(28	)	(30	)%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

Our life insurance business ~~increased $40~~decreased $36 million principally from ~~an $11~~a $41 million ~~gain on~~net loss related to a life block sale transaction in the current year that included a loss related to a third-party reinsurance treaty and gains associated with the repurchase of ~~notes secured by our~~ non-recourse funding ~~obligations,~~obligations. The decrease was also attributable to less favorable mortality ~~higher investment income, improved persistency~~in our term life insurance products compared to the prior year and an $8 million favorable impact from a change in premium taxes in Virginia in the prior year that did not recur, partially offset by favorable persistency. These decreases were partially offset by a $13 million favorable adjustment related to the Tax Matters Agreement with our former parent company in the current year and growth of our term universal life insurance ~~product.~~products.

Our long-term care insurance business ~~decreased $16 million mainly attributable to~~was relatively flat as higher claims and lower claim termination rates in older issued policies ~~partially~~were offset by the favorable performance of newer issued ~~policies.~~policies and in-force rate actions. In addition, the prior year included an unfavorable adjustment of $4 million related to the accounting for interest rate swaps that did not recur.

Our ~~wealth management~~fixed annuities business increased $9 million primarily related to a $3 million ~~primarily from higher average assets under management from market growth and positive net flows.~~

~~Our retirement income business increased $8 million largely related to an increase of $9 million in our fee-based products from~~ favorable ~~market performance~~adjustment associated with guarantee funds in the current year compared to a $3 million accrual related to guarantee funds in the prior year. ~~This~~The increase was ~~partially offset by a $1 million decrease in our spread-based products from higher amortization due~~also attributable to ~~less favorable adjustments related to lapses, partially offset by more favorable mortality in our single premium immediate annuity product.~~growth and lower interest credited.

Revenues

Premiums

Our life insurance business decreased ~~$10~~$233 million primarily ~~as a result of the runoff of our~~related to higher ceded reinsurance on certain term life insurance ~~products.~~policies under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction in the current year.

Our long-term care insurance business increased ~~$22~~$30 million mainly attributable to growth of the in-force block from new ~~sales.~~sales and in-force rate actions.

Our ~~retirement income~~fixed annuities business ~~decreased $12~~increased $13 million primarily ~~driven by lower life-contingent~~attributable to higher sales of our ~~spread-based products.~~life-contingent products in the current year.

Net investment income

Our life insurance business ~~increased $22 million mainly related to~~was flat as higher average invested assets ~~and~~were offset by lower reinvestment ~~of cash balances. Net investment income~~yields in the ~~second quarter of 2011 also included higher gains of $4 million from limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method and $4 million from bond calls and prepayments.~~current year.

Our long-term care insurance business increased ~~$18~~$26 million largely ~~as a result of~~from an increase in average invested assets due to growth of our ~~long-term care insurance~~ in-force block. Included in the prior year was an unfavorable adjustment of $6 million related to the accounting for interest rate swaps that did not recur.

Our ~~retirement income~~fixed annuities business decreased ~~$10~~$8 million primarily attributable to ~~a decline in average invested assets. Net investment income also included $10~~lower reinvestment yields, partially offset by higher gains of $5 million ~~of additional investment income~~ from ~~bond calls and prepayments~~limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method in the current year.

Net investment gains (losses).For further discussion of the change in net investment gains (losses), see the comparison for this line item under “—Investments and Derivative Instruments.”

Net investment losses in our life insurance business increased $8$5 million primarily driven by ~~higher~~net losses ~~from the sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning.~~

Our long-term care insurance business had net investment losses of $8 million in the current year mainly from impairments. Net investment gains of $4 million in the prior year were primarily attributable to gains from the sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning, partially offset by impairments.

Net investment losses in our retirement income business decreased $43 million largely attributable to a $37 million decrease in losses related to our spread-based products primarily related to higher derivative gains and higher gains from the sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning in the current year compared to net gains in the prior year, partially offset by lower impairments in the current year. ~~Our fee-based products had~~

Net investment losses in our long-term care insurance business decreased $6 million ofpredominately from derivative gains and lower ~~losses on embedded derivatives associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs~~impairments in the current year, partially offset by higher net losses on the sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning.

Our fixed annuities business had net investment gains of $5 million in the current year compared to net investment losses of $13 million in the prior year mainly attributable to higher derivative gains and lower ~~derivative gains.~~impairments in the current year.

Insurance and investment product fees and ~~other~~other.

~~Our~~The increase was attributable to our life insurance business ~~increased $61 million~~ primarily from ~~growth~~$88 million of ~~our term universal and universal life insurance products and also included a gain of $17 million from~~gains on the repurchase of notes secured by our non-recourse funding obligations related to a life block sale transaction in the current year and growth of our term universal life insurance product. The increase was also attributable to growth of our universal life insurance products, partially offset by an unfavorable valuation adjustment in the current year.

Our wealth management business increased $25 million primarily attributable to higher average assets under management from the purchase of Altegris in the fourth quarter of 2010, market growth and positive net flows.

~~Our retirement income business increased $4 million mainly as a result of higher average account values in our fee-based products from favorable market performance.~~

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves

Our life insurance business ~~increased $7~~decreased $197 million principally related to higher ceded reinsurance in the current year. We initially ceded $209 million of certain term life insurance reserves under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction. This decrease was partially offset by growth ofin our term universal life insurance ~~product. This increase was partially offset by improved persistency~~product and less favorable mortality in our term and term universal life insurance products in the current year as a result of smaller blocks entering the post-level rate period and overall lower lapse rates and favorable mortality on our universal and term life insurance products in the current year as compared to the prior year.

Our long-term care insurance business increased ~~$62~~$58 million primarily ~~as a result of~~from the aging and growth of our ~~long-term care insurance~~ in-force block and higher claims and lower claim termination rates on older issued policies. Also included in the increase was a reclassification of loss adjustment expenses of $11 million from acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and an $11 million increase in reserves associated with a methodology change related to pending claims. These increases were partially offset by a favorable actuarial adjustment of $16 million in the current year related to a multi-stage system conversion.

Our ~~retirement income~~fixed annuities business ~~decreased $26~~increased $10 million largely attributable to ~~a decrease~~higher sales of ~~$22 million from~~ our life-contingent ~~spread-based~~ products as a result of a decline in sales in the current year and more favorable mortality in the current year compared to prior year. Our fee-based products decreased $4 million driven by a decline in our guaranteed minimum death benefit claims.

~~Interest credited~~

~~Our life insurance business increased $8 million from the timing of reinsurance activity~~ in the current year.

~~Our retirement income~~Interest credited. The decrease is primarily related to our fixed annuities business ~~decreased $10 million~~mainly from lower ~~account values on fixed annuities and lower~~ crediting rates ~~as the fixed annuities reach the end of their initial crediting rate guarantee period~~ in a low interest rate environment.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals

Our life insurance business increased ~~$2 million primarily related to higher expenses from growth of our term universal life insurance product.~~

~~Our wealth management business increased $20 million primarily from increased asset-based expenses from the acquisition of Altegris in the fourth quarter of 2010, market growth and positive net flows.~~

~~Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles~~

Our life insurance business decreased $2 million primarily attributable to lower amortization of deferred acquisition costs related to our term life insurance products in the post-level rate period, partially offset by an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs driven by favorable mortality in our universal life insurance products.

Our long-term care insurance business was flat as growth of our long-term care insurance in-force block was offset by a decrease in amortization due to deferring costs associated with the sale of joint policies that were incorrectly expensed in prior years as a result of a system conversion in late 2008 that was identified and corrected in the fourth quarter of 2010.

Our retirement income business increased $16 million primarily related to an increase of $20 million in our spread-based products principally from less favorable adjustments related to lapses and higher amortization of deferred acquisition costs attributable to lower net investment losses in the current year. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the account values of these products. Our fee-based products decreased $4 million mainly from favorable equity market performance in the current year, partially offset by an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs from lower derivative losses.

~~Interest expense.~~ Interest expense decreased $3 million related to our life insurance business from the write-off of capitalized costs associated with our non-recourse funding obligations in the prior year, partially offset by higher letter of credit fees in the current year.

~~Provision for income taxes.~~The effective tax rate increased to 34.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 33.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to tax favored investment benefits in relation to higher pre-tax earnings in the current year compared to the prior year.

~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Retirement and Protection segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Six months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 1,640    $ 1,646    $ (6 ) —   %
Net investment income
   1,288    1,224    64    5 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   (74 ) (136 ) 62    46 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   668    502    166    33 %


Total revenues
   3,522    3,236    286    9 %


Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   1,993    1,906    87    5 %
Interest credited
   341    350    (9 ) (3 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   547    482    65    13 %
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   229    209    20    10 %
Interest expense
   52    51    1    2 %


Total benefits and expenses
   3,162    2,998    164    5 %


Income before income taxes
   360    238    122    51 %
Provision for income taxes
   125    73    52    71 %


Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   235    165    70    42 %
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   41    71    (30 ) (42 )%


Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 276    $ 236    $ 40    17 %

~~The following table sets forth net operating income for the businesses included in our Retirement and Protection segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Six months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
       2011            2010        2011 vs. 2010
Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Life insurance
   $ 124       $ 69       $ 55    80 %
Long-term care insurance
   71       87       (16 ) (18 )%
Wealth management
   23       21       2    10 %
Retirement income
   58       59       (1 ) (2 )%






Total net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 276       $ 236       $ 40    17 %

~~Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~

Our life insurance business increased $55 million from growth of our term universal life insurance product, an $11 million gain on the repurchase of notes secured by our non-recourse funding obligations, an $8 million favorable cumulative impact from a recent change in premium taxes in Virginia and higher investment income. These increases were partially offset by the runoff of our term life insurance products. The prior year also included an unfavorable reinsurance adjustment of $5 million and a favorable tax settlement that did not recur.

~~Our long-term care insurance business decreased $16 million as higher claims in older issued policies were partially offset by the favorable performance of newer issued policies.~~

Our wealth management business increased $2 million as a result of higher average assets under management from market growth and positive net flows which were partially offset by a $2 million favorable tax adjustment in the prior year that did not recur.

Our retirement income business was relatively flat. Our fee-based products increased $3 million mainly attributable to favorable market performance, partially offset by an $8 million favorable adjustment to deferred acquisition costs in the prior year that did not recur and a $7 million charge in the first quarter of 2011 from the discontinuance of our variable annuity offerings announced in 2011. Our spread-based products decreased $4 million primarily from an increase in amortization due to less favorable adjustments related to lapses and a decrease in net investment income, partially offset by more favorable mortality in our single premium immediate annuity product.

~~Revenues~~

~~Premiums~~

Our life insurance business decreased $17 million primarily as a result of the runoff of our term life insurance products, partially offset by an unfavorable reinsurance adjustment of $8 million in the prior year that did not recur.

~~Our long-term care insurance business increased $39 million mainly attributable to growth in the in-force block from new sales.~~

~~Our retirement income business decreased $28 million primarily driven by lower life-contingent sales of our spread-based products.~~

~~Net investment income~~

Our life insurance business increased $46 million mainly related to higher average invested assets and reinvestment of cash balances. Net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 also included gains of $9 million from limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method compared to losses of $2 million in the prior year and $6 million of additional investment income from bond calls and prepayments in the current year.

Our long-term care insurance business increased $37 million largely as a result of an increase in average invested assets due to growth of our long-term care insurance in-force block. These increases were partially offset by an unfavorable adjustment of $6 million related to the accounting for interest rate swaps in the current year.

Our retirement income business decreased $19 million primarily attributable to a decline in average invested assets. Net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 also included $14 million of additional income from bond calls and prepayments and higher gains of $5 million from limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method compared to prior year.

~~Net investment losses in our life insurance business decreased $18 million primarily driven by lower impairments in the current year.~~

Our long-term care insurance business had net investment losses of $16 million in the current year mainly from impairments compared to net investment gains of $6 million in the prior year primarily from derivative gains and gains from the sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning, partially offset by impairments.

Net investment losses in our retirement income business decreased $66 million largely attributable to a $52 million decrease in our spread-based products primarily related to derivative gains in the current year compared to losses in the prior year and higher gains from the sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning in the current year. Our fee-based products had $14 million in lower losses primarily related to gains on embedded derivatives associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs in the current year compared to losses in the prior year.

~~Insurance and investment product fees and other~~

Our life insurance business increased $100 million primarily from growth of our term universal and universal life insurance products and also included a gain of $17 million from the repurchase of notes secured by our non-recourse funding obligations in the current year.

Our wealth management business increased $54 million primarily attributable to higher average assets under management from the purchase of Altegris in the fourth quarter of 2010, market growth and positive net flows.

~~Our retirement income business increased $12 million mainly as a result of higher average account values in our fee-based products from favorable market performance.~~

~~Benefits and expenses~~

~~Benefits and other changes in policy reserves~~

~~Our life insurance business increased $37 million principally related to growth of our term universal life insurance product, partially offset by the runoff of our term life insurance products.~~

~~Our long-term care insurance business increased $96 million primarily as a result of the aging and growth of our long-term care insurance in-force block and higher claims on older issued policies.~~

Our retirement income business decreased $46 million largely attributable to a decrease of $39 million from our life-contingent spread-based products as a result of a decline in sales in the current year and more favorable mortality in the current year compared to prior year. Our fee-based products decreased $7 million driven by a decline in our guaranteed minimum death benefit claims.

~~Interest credited~~

~~Our life insurance business increased $11 million from the timing of reinsurance activity in the current year.~~

Our retirement income business decreased $18 million from lower account values on fixed annuities and lower crediting rates as the fixed annuities reach the end of their initial crediting rate guarantee period in a low interest rate environment.

~~Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals~~

~~Our life insurance business decreased $6~~ million primarily related to a $13 million favorable cumulative impact from a ~~recent~~ change in premium taxes in Virginia in the ~~first quarter of 2011, partially offset by higher expenses~~prior year that did not recur and from growth of our term universal life insurance product.

Our long-term care insurance business ~~increased $12~~decreased $6 million ~~largely attributable~~primarily related to a reclassification of loss adjustment expenses of $11 million to benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the current year, partially offset by growth of our ~~long-term care insurance~~ in-force block.

Our ~~wealth management~~fixed annuities business ~~increased $46~~decreased $6 million primarily ~~from increased asset-based expenses from the acquisition of Altegris in the fourth quarter of 2010, market growth and positive net flows.~~

~~Our retirement income business increased $13 million largely driven by~~related to a ~~$9 million charge in the first quarter of 2011 from the discontinuance of our variable annuity offerings announced in 2011 and an increase~~favorable adjustment of $4 million ~~from an~~associated with guarantee funds in the current year compared to a $4 million accrual related to guarantee funds in the ~~current~~prior year.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles

Our life insurance business ~~decreased $9~~increased $139 million ~~primarily attributable~~principally related to ~~lower amortization~~higher ceded reinsurance as we wrote off $142 million of deferred acquisition costs ~~related~~associated with certain term life insurance policies under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction in the current year. Higher amortization was also attributable to our universal life insurance products due to growth, partially offset by lower lapses in our term life insurance policies in the post-level rate period and a decrease in amortization of present value of future profits driven by higher mortality in our universal life insurance products. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs due to growth of our universal life insurance products.

Our ~~long-term care insurance~~fixed annuities business ~~decreased $5~~increased $6 million primarily from a decrease in amortization due to deferring costs associated with the sale of joint policies that were incorrectly expensed in prior years as a result of a system conversion in late 2008 that was identified and corrected in the fourth quarter of 2010 that was partially offset by growth of our long-term care insurance in-force block.

~~Our retirement income business increased $34 million primarily related to an increase of $25 million in our spread-based products mainly from less favorable adjustments related to lapses and~~ higher amortization of deferred acquisition costs attributable to ~~lower~~higher net investment losses in the current year. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the account values of these products. Our fee-based products increased $9 million principally from a $12 million favorable adjustment recorded in the prior year that did not recur and an increase in amortization of deferred acquisition costs from lower derivative lossesgains in the current year, partially offset by ~~favorable equity market performance~~lower surrenders in the current year.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased related to our life insurance business primarily from a $20 million favorable adjustment related to the Tax Matters Agreement with our former parent company. This decrease was partially offset by the write-off of $8 million in deferred borrowing costs from the repurchase and repayment of non-recourse funding obligations associated with a life block sale transaction in the current year.

Provision for income taxes.The effective tax rate ~~increased to 34.7%~~was relatively flat at 35.6% for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011 from 30.7%~~March 31, 2012 compared to 35.5% for the ~~six~~three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to tax favored investment benefits in relation to higher pre-tax earnings in the current year compared to the prior year.March 31, 2011.

~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance selected ~~financial and~~ operating performance measures

Life insurance

The following ~~tables set~~table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our life insurance business as of or for the dates indicated:

   Three months
ended June 30,    Increase (decrease)
and percentage change Six months
ended June 30,    Increase (decrease)
and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011    2010            2011 vs. 2010          2011    2010             2011 vs. 2010
Term life insurance

Net earned premiums
   $ 218       $ 228       $ (10 ) (4 )% $ 437       $ 452       $ (15 ) (3 )%
Annualized first-year premiums
   —         4       (4 ) (100 )% —         18       (18 ) (100 )%
Term universal life insurance

Net deposits
   $ 45       $ 14       $ 31    NM ⁽¹⁾ $ 80       $ 19       $ 61    NM ⁽¹⁾
Annualized first-year deposits
   36       24       12    50 % 67       34       33    97 %
Universal and whole life insurance

Net earned premiums and deposits
   $ 156       $ 121       $ 35    29 % $ 318       $ 239       $ 79    33 %
Universal life annualized first-year deposits
   9       10       (1 ) (10 )% 20       17       3 18 %
Universal life excess deposits
   35       28       7    25 % 71       48       23    48 %
Linked-benefits⁽²⁾
   25       —         25    NM ⁽¹⁾ 48       —         48    NM ⁽¹⁾
Total life insurance

Net earned premiums and deposits
   $ 419       $ 363       $ 56    15 % $ 835       $ 710       $ 125    18 %
Annualized first-year premiums
   —         4       (4 ) (100 )% —         18       (18 ) (100 )%
Annualized first-year deposits
   45       34       11    32 % 87       51       36    71 %
Universal life excess deposits
   35       28       7    25 % 71       48       23    48 %
Linked-benefits⁽²⁾
   25       —         25    NM ⁽¹⁾ 48       —         48    NM ⁽¹⁾


	Three months ended March 31,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011		2012 vs. 2011
Term and whole life insurance⁽¹⁾
Net earned premiums	$	(11	)	$	222	$	(233	)	(105	)%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		391,870			454,704		(62,834	)	(14	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		561,186			590,569		(29,383	)	(5	)%
Term universal life insurance
Net deposits	$	64		$	35	$	29		83	%
Sales⁽²⁾		31			30		1		3	%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		112,906			58,371		54,535		93	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		113,737			58,811		54,926		93	%
Universal life insurance⁽¹⁾
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	174		$	159	$	15		9	%
Sales:⁽²⁾
Universal life insurance		16			15		1		7	%
Linked-benefits		3			2		1		50	%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		42,734			41,543		1,191		3	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		49,527			47,831		1,696		4	%
Total life insurance
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	227		$	416	$	(189	)	(45	)%
Sales:⁽²⁾
Term universal life insurance		31			30		1		3	%
Universal life insurance		16			15		1		7	%
Linked-benefits		3			2		1		50	%
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance		547,510			554,618		(7,108	)	(1	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		724,450			697,211		27,239		4	%

⁽¹⁾	~~We define “NM” as not meaningful~~The prior period amounts have been re-presented to report whole life insurance with term life insurance. Amounts for ~~increases or decreases greater than 200%.~~whole life insurance were previously reported with universal life insurance.

⁽²⁾

In the first quarter of ~~2011,~~2012, we ~~began reporting the results~~changed our definition of ~~the linked-benefits product for universal life insurance in~~sales related to our life insurance business. ~~The linked-benefits product for~~For term universal and universal life insurance, ~~was previously reported in our long-term care insurance business.~~sales represent annualized first-year deposits plus 5% of excess deposits. For linked-benefits products, sales represent 10% of premium deposits. The ~~amounts associated with this product were not material and the~~ prior period amounts ~~were not re-presented.~~have been re-presented to conform to the new definition.

Term and whole life insurance

Net earned premiums decreased mainly related to higher ceded reinsurance on certain term life insurance policies under a new reinsurance treaty as part of a life block sale transaction in the current year.

Term universal life insurance

Net deposits and our in-force block have increased due to continued growth of this product.

Universal life insurance

Net earned premiums and deposits and our in-force block have increased due primarily to the growth of our universal life insurance products.

Long-term care insurance

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our individual and group long-term care insurance products for the periods indicated:

   As of June 30,    Percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011    2010    2011 vs. 2010
Term life insurance

Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance
   $ 447,336       $ 468,098       (4 )%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance
   580,113       612,284       (5 )%
Term universal life insurance

Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance
   $ 73,569       $ 17,754       NM ⁽¹⁾
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance
   74,107       17,820       NM ⁽¹⁾
Universal and whole life insurance

Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance
   $ 44,207       $ 43,743       1 %
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance
   50,884       50,617       1 %
Total life insurance

Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance
   $ 565,112       $ 529,595       7 %
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance
   705,104       680,721       4 %


(Amounts in millions)	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Net earned premiums:
Individual long-term care insurance	$	504		$	477		$	27		6	%
Group long-term care insurance		17			14			3		21	%

Total	$	521		$	491		$	30		6	%

Annualized first-year premiums and deposits:
Individual long-term care insurance	$	45		$	46		$	(1	)	(2	)%
Group long-term care insurance		3			2			1		50	%

Annualized first-year premiums and deposits	$	48		$	48		$	—		—	%

Loss ratio		66	%		65	%		1	%

The loss ratio is the ratio of benefits and other changes in reserves less tabular interest on reserves less loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums.

Net earned premiums increased mainly attributable to growth of our in-force block from new sales and in-force rate actions.

The loss ratio was relatively flat as less favorable mortality and higher claims and lower claim termination rates on older issued policies were offset by an increase in premiums.

Fixed annuities

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our fixed annuities as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
Single premium deferred annuities
Account value, beginning of period	$	10,831		$	10,819
Deposits		264			120
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(330	)		(368	)

Net flows		(66	)		(248	)
Interest credited		84			89

Account value, end of period	$	10,849		$	10,660

Single premium immediate annuities
Account value, beginning of period	$	6,433		$	6,528
Premiums and deposits		106			85
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(237	)		(256	)

Net flows		(131	)		(171	)
Interest credited		78			83
Effect of accumulated net unrealized investment gains (losses)		24			(29	)

Account value, end of period	$	6,404		$	6,411

Structured settlements
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	1,107		$	1,113
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(14	)		(15	)

Net flows		(14	)		(15	)
Interest credited		14			15

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	1,107		$	1,113

Total premiums from fixed annuities	$	33		$	20

Total deposits from fixed annuities	$	337		$	185

Single premium deferred annuities

Account value of our single premium deferred annuities increased as deposits and interest credited outpaced surrenders. Sales have increased in the current year driven by a more competitive offering.

Single premium immediate annuities

Account value of our single premium immediate annuities decreased as surrenders exceeded premiums and deposits, partially offset by an increase in net unrealized investment gains. Sales continued to be pressured given the low interest rate environment and other market conditions.

Structured settlements

We no longer solicit sales of structured settlements; however, we continue to service our existing block of business.

International Protection segment

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our International Protection segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Premiums	$	179		$	215		$	(36	)	(17	)%
Net investment income		36			48			(12	)	(25	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		1			2			(1	)	(50	)%
Insurance and investment product fees and other		2			5			(3	)	(60	)%

Total revenues		218			270			(52	)	(19	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		41			32			9		28	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		127			152			(25	)	(16	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		31			36			(5	)	(14	)%
Interest expense		11			13			(2	)	(15	)%

Total benefits and expenses		210			233			(23	)	(10	)%

Income before income taxes		8			37			(29	)	(78	)%
Provision for income taxes		2			10			(8	)	(80	)%

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc’s common stockholders		6			27			(21	)	(78	)%
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		(1	)		(2	)		1		50	%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	5		$	25		$	(20	)	(80	)%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders decreased as a result of lower premiums, lower investment income and an increase in reserves, partially offset by lower expenses. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Revenues

Premiums decreased primarily due to lower premium volume driven by reduced levels of consumer lending and our runoff block of business. The current year also included an unfavorable adjustment of $4 million related to a German premium tax. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net investment income decreased principally attributable to reinsurance arrangements accounted for under the deposit method of accounting as certain of these arrangements were in a lower gain position. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Insurance and investment product fees and other decreased mainly attributable to lower third-party administration fees.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased primarily driven by lower favorable claim reserve adjustments in the current year. In addition, we reclassified loss adjustment expenses of $3 million from acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased largely from lower paid commissions related to a decline in new business, lower profit commissions driven by higher claims and lower professional fees. In addition, we reclassified loss adjustment expenses of $3 million to benefits and other changes in policy reserves in the current year. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles decreased primarily as a result of lower premium volume.

Interest expense decreased mainly due to reinsurance arrangements accounted for under the deposit method of accounting as certain of these arrangements were in a lower loss position in the current year.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate decreased to 25.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from 27.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in lower taxed foreign income.

International Protection selected operating performance measures

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our International Protection segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Lifestyle protection insurance:
Traditional indemnity premiums	$	228		$	242		$	(14	)	(6	)%
Premium equivalents for administrative services only business		2			6			(4	)	(67	)%
Reinsurance premiums assumed accounted for under the deposit method		149			175			(26	)	(15	)%

Total	$	379		$	423		$	(44	)	(10	)%

Loss ratio		23	%		15	%		8	%

The loss ratio is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums.

Sales declined from reduced levels of consumer lending as a result of deteriorating economic conditions in certain regions. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $11 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

The loss ratio increased driven mainly by lower favorable claim reserve adjustments in the current year and a decrease in premiums from lower volumes driven by reduced levels of consumer lending and our runoff block of business.

Wealth Management segment

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Segment results of operations

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Wealth Management segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012		2011		2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Net investment gains (losses)	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	%
Insurance and investment product fees and other		112		110		2	2	%

Total revenues		112		110		2	2	%

Benefits and expenses:
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		92		92		—	—	%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		1		1		—	—	%

Total benefits and expenses		93		93		—	—	%

Income before income taxes		19		17		2	12	%
Provision for income taxes		7		7		—	—	%

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc’s common stockholders		12		10		2	20	%
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		—		—		—	—	%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	12	$	10	$	2	20	%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

The increase in net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders was the result of higher average assets under management from favorable market performance and market growth, partially offset by negative net flows and higher redemptions.

Revenues

Insurance and investment product fees and other increased primarily attributable to higher average assets under management from favorable market performance and market growth, partially offset by negative net flows. Negative flows in the three months ended March 31, 2012 were $359 million primarily related to the movement of a legacy block of managed accounts and from prior year relative investment performance.

Benefits and expenses

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, were flat as higher asset-based expenses from market growth were offset by lower commission expenses and negative net flows.

Provision for income taxes.The effective tax rate decreased to 36.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from 41.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in the effective state tax rates.

Wealth Management selected operating performance measures

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our Wealth Management segment as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
Assets under management, beginning of period	$	25,087		$	24,740
Gross flows		1,516			2,058
Redemptions		(1,875	)		(1,703	)

Net flows		(359	)		355
Market performance		956			456

Assets under management, end of period	$	25,684		$	25,551

Wealth Management results represent Genworth Financial Wealth Management, Inc., GFIS, Genworth Financial Trust Company, Centurion Financial Advisers, Inc., Quantivus Consulting, Inc. and the Altegris companies.

The increase in assets under management was attributable to favorable market performance during the current year and market growth, partially offset by negative net flows. Negative flows in the three months ended March 31, 2012 were $359 million primarily related to the movement of a legacy block of managed accounts and from prior year relative investment performance.

On April 2, 2012, we completed the sale of our tax and accounting financial advisor unit, GFIS, for approximately $79 million, plus an earnout provision, to Cetera Financial Group. As a result of the sale, assets under management will decrease by approximately $2.8 billion in the second quarter of 2012.

Global Mortgage Insurance Division

Division results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Global Mortgage Insurance Division, formerly referred to as the Mortgage Insurance Division. See below for a discussion by segment.


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
International Mortgage Insurance segment:
Canada	$	37		$	51		$	(14	)	(27	)%
Australia		(21	)		52			(73	)	(140	)%
Other Countries		(9	)		(4	)		(5	)	125	%

International Mortgage Insurance segment		7			99			(92	)	(93	)%

U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment		(43	)		(83	)		40		(48	)%

Total net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		(36	)		16			(52	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Adjustment to net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments		17			1			16		NM	⁽¹⁾

Net income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		(19	)		17			(36	)	NM	⁽¹⁾
Add: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		33			34			(1	)	(3	)%

Net income	$	14		$	51		$	(37	)	(73	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

~~Term life insurance~~International Mortgage Insurance segment

Net earned premiums decreased mainly as a result of the runoff of our term life insurance products. For the six months ended June 30 2011, the decrease was partially offset by an unfavorable reinsurance adjustment of $8 million in the prior year that did not recur. The in-force block also decreased due to runoff.

~~Term universal life insurance~~

~~Net deposits increased due to growth of this product since its introduction in late 2009. The in-force block has increased primarily driven by strong production and product adoption.~~

~~Universal and whole life insurance~~

Net earned premiums and deposits increased due primarily to the growth of our universal life insurance products. The in-force block was relatively flat as the growth in our universal life insurance products was offset by the continued runoff of our closed block of whole life insurance.

~~Long-term care insurance~~Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth ~~selected financial and operating performance measures regarding~~the results of operations relating to our ~~long-term care insurance business, which includes individual and group long-term care insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, as well as several runoff blocks of accident and health insurance~~International Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change Six months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
       2011            2010            2011 vs. 2010     2011    2010    2011 vs. 2010
Net earned premiums:

Long-term care
   $ 495       $ 480       $ 15       3 % $ 987       $ 959       $ 28       3 %
Medicare supplement and other
   85       78       7       9 % 169       158       11       7 %













Total
   $ 580       $ 558       $ 22       4 % $ 1,156       $ 1,117       $ 39       3 %













Annualized first-year premiums and deposits
   $ 69       $ 60       $ 9       15 % $ 134       $ 127       $ 7       6 %


(Amounts in millions)	Three months ended March 31,					Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012		2011			2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Premiums	$	247	$	262		$	(15	)	(6	)%
Net investment income		97		95			2		2	%
Net investment gains (losses)		2		4			(2	)	(50	)%
Insurance and investment product fees and other		—		1			(1	)	(100	)%

Total revenues		346		362			(16	)	(4	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		207		109			98		90	%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		59		60			(1	)	(2	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		17		17			—		—	%
Interest expense		10		6			4		67	%

Total benefits and expenses		293		192			101		53	%

Income before income taxes		53		170			(117	)	(69	)%
Provision for income taxes		13		36			(23	)	(64	)%

Net income		40		134			(94	)	(70	)%
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		33		34			(1	)	(3	)%

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		7		100			(93	)	(93	)%
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		—		(1	)		1		100	%

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	7	$	99		$	(92	)	(93	)%

The following table sets forth net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the businesses included in our International Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Canada	$	37		$	51		$	(14	)	(27	)%
Australia		(21	)		52			(73	)	(140	)%
Other Countries		(9	)		(4	)		(5	)	(125	)%

Total net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	7		$	99		$	(92	)	(93	)%

Net ~~earned~~operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

The three months ended March 31, 2012 included a decrease of $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Our Canadian mortgage insurance business decreased from higher overall taxes and lower premiums.

Our Australian mortgage insurance business reported a net operating loss in the current year compared to net operating income in the prior year primarily driven by a reserve strengthening and lower premiums in the current year. The reserve strengthening was based on the frequency and severity of claims arising from prior years as lenders accelerated the processing of later stage delinquencies through to foreclosure.

Other Countries’ net operating loss increased primarily from higher losses in Ireland, where we experienced increased new delinquencies, and continued aging of existing delinquencies in the current year as a result of a prolonged economic downturn.

Revenues

Premiums

Our Canadian mortgage insurance business decreased $11 million, including a decrease of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, principally from the seasoning of our in-force block of business.

Our Australian mortgage insurance business decreased $2 million, including an increase of $4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily related to higher ceded reinsurance premiums and lower premiums attributable to the seasoning of our in-force block of business.

Other Countries decreased $2 million, including a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily as a result of lower premiums attributable to the seasoning of our in-force block of business in Europe.

Net investment income

Our Canadian mortgage insurance business decreased $1 million, including a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. Net investment income was relatively flat mainly attributable to ~~growth in our in-force block from new sales.~~

~~The increase in annualized first-year premiums and deposits was primarily attributable to growth in our individual long-term care insurance products,~~reinvestment of cash balances, partially offset by lower average invested assets.

Our Australian mortgage insurance business increased $4 million, including an increase of $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, largely from higher average invested assets, partially offset by lower investment yields.

Net investment gains (losses)

Net investment gains in our Canadian mortgage insurance business increased principally from higher gains on the sale of securities during the current year.

Net investment losses in our Australian mortgage insurance business in the current year related primarily to derivative losses.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves

Our Canadian mortgage insurance business decreased $4 million, including a ~~change~~decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in ~~reporting related~~foreign exchange rates. Losses decreased primarily driven by lower

delinquencies and paid claims due to a shift in regional mix with fewer claims from Alberta and from benefits from loss mitigation activities. This decrease was partially offset by increased severity on existing delinquencies.

Our Australian mortgage insurance business increased $96 million, including an increase of $8 million attributable to ~~our linked-benefits products.~~changes in foreign exchange rates. In the first quarter of ~~2011,~~2012, we ~~began reporting~~strengthened reserves by $82 million due to higher than anticipated frequency and severity of claims paid from later stage delinquencies from prior years, particularly in coastal tourism areas of Queensland as a result of regional economic pressures as well as our 2007 and 2008 vintages which have a higher concentration of self-employed borrowers. The adverse change in claims paid in the ~~results~~current year resulted in increased frequency and severity assumptions for our remaining portfolio of delinquent loans.

Other Countries increased $6 million, including a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, primarily from higher new delinquencies and continued aging of existing delinquencies, particularly in Ireland. This increase was partially offset by benefits from ongoing loss mitigation activities.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals

Our Canadian mortgage insurance business decreased $1 million, including a decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, were flat as lower operating expenses were offset by higher stock-based compensation expense.

Our Australian mortgage insurance business increased $2 million, including an increase of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, were relatively flat as higher deferrable expenses driven by volume were largely offset by lower overall expenses.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased related to our Australian mortgage insurance business from the ~~linked-benefits products~~issuance of debt by our wholly-owned subsidiary in June 2011.

Provision for ~~universal life insurance and single premium deferred annuity products~~income taxes. The effective tax rate increased to 24.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from 21.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This increase in ~~our life insurance and spread-based retirement income businesses, respectively.~~the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in lower taxed foreign income. The ~~linked-benefits products were previously reported~~three months ended March 31, 2012 included decrease of $1 million attributable to changes in ~~our long-term care insurance business.~~foreign exchange rates.

~~Wealth management~~

~~The following table sets forth~~International Mortgage Insurance selected ~~financial~~operating performance measures ~~regarding our wealth management business as of or for the dates indicated:~~

   As of or for the three
months ended June 30, As of or for the six
months ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
       2011         2010         2011         2010
Assets under management, beginning of period
   $ 25,551    $ 20,037    $ 24,740    $ 18,865
Gross flows
   1,807    1,362    3,865    2,837
Redemptions
   (1,143 ) (926 ) (2,846 ) (1,897 )


Net flows
   664    436    1,019    940
Market performance
   (285 ) (925 ) 171    (257 )


Assets under management, end of period
   $ 25,930    $ 19,548    $ 25,930    $ 19,548

Wealth Management results represent Genworth Financial Wealth Management, Inc., Genworth Financial Investment Services, Inc., Genworth Financial Trust Company, Centurion Financial Advisers, Inc., Quantavis Consulting, Inc. and the Altegris companies.

~~The increase in assets under management was attributable to market growth, positive net flows and the acquisition of Altegris on December 31, 2010.~~

~~Retirement income~~

~~Fee-based products~~

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our ~~fee-based~~International Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the dates indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	As of or for the three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012		2011		2012 vs. 2011
Primary insurance in-force:
Canada	$	269,100	$	256,700	$	12,400		5	%
Australia		287,100		284,600		2,500		1	%
Other Countries		33,600		36,200		(2,600	)	(7	)%

Total	$	589,800	$	577,500	$	12,300		2	%

Risk in-force:
Canada	$	94,200	$	89,900	$	4,300		5	%
Australia		100,500		99,600		900		1	%
Other Countries		4,600		5,200		(600	)	(12	)%

Total	$	199,300	$	194,700	$	4,600		2	%

New insurance written:
Canada	$	4,000	$	5,500	$	(1,500	)	(27	)%
Australia		8,000		6,500		1,500		23	%
Other Countries		300		700		(400	)	(57	)%

Total	$	12,300	$	12,700	$	(400	)	(3	)%

Net premiums written:
Canada	$	79	$	101	$	(22	)	(22	)%
Australia		102		61		41		67	%
Other Countries		6		10		(4	)	(40	)%

Total	$	187	$	172	$	15		9	%

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force

Our businesses in Australia and Canada currently provide 100% coverage on the majority of the loans we insure in those markets. For the purpose of representing our risk in-force, we have computed an “effective” risk in-force amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our businesses in Australia and Canada. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, this factor was 35%.

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force increased primarily as a result of new insurance written in Canada and Australia. In Other Countries, the decrease was mainly attributable to prior year settlements in Europe, partially offset by new insurance written. Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force also included decreases of $10.5 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates as of March 31, 2012.

New insurance written

New insurance written decreased primarily as a result of declines in bulk new insurance written. In Canada, flow new insurance written also declined mainly attributable to smaller mortgage originations markets, particularly high loan-to-value refinance transactions, partially offset by a slight improvement in our estimated

market share. In Europe, flow new insurance written declined due to lower volume from existing lenders as the mortgage market experienced pressure as well as a decision to selectively reduce new business, including exiting certain distribution relationships. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in flow new insurance written in Australia primarily attributable to a larger mortgage originations market as the market in the prior year was impacted by the economic effect of natural disasters, partially offset by a slight decrease in our estimated market share. The three months ended March 31, 2012 included an increase of $0.2 billion attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Net premiums written

Most of our international mortgage insurance policies provide for single premiums at the time that loan proceeds are advanced. We initially record the single premiums to unearned premium reserves and recognize the premiums earned over time in accordance with the expected pattern of risk emergence. As of March 31, 2012, our unearned premium reserves were $2.9 billion, including a decrease of $64 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, compared to $3.1 billion as of March 31, 2011. Our unearned premium reserves decreased primarily related to the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business.

Net premiums written increased in Australia from higher flow volume and higher average price, partially offset by higher ceded reinsurance premiums and lower bulk volume in the current year. Net premiums written in Canada decreased primarily from a smaller mortgage originations market and lower average price, partially offset by a shift in mix with purchases comprising a higher proportion of new mortgage originations. In Other Countries, net premiums written decreased primarily from lower flow new insurance written in Europe, particularly in Italy, in the current year.

Loss and expense ratios

The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our International Mortgage Insurance segment for the dates indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Loss ratio:
Canada		38	%		38	%		—	%
Australia		154	%		45	%		109	%
Other Countries		128	%		62	%		66	%
Total		84	%		42	%		42	%
Expense ratio:
Canada		46	%		37	%		9	%
Australia		29	%		46	%		(17	)%
Other Countries		162	%		114	%		48	%
Total		41	%		45	%		(4	)%

The loss ratio is the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio is the ratio of general expenses to net premiums written. In our business, general expenses consist of acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, and amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles.

The increase in the loss ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily attributable to a reserve strengthening in Australia in the current year and higher losses in Europe. In Australia, we strengthened reserves by $82 million due to higher than anticipated frequency and severity of claims paid from later stage delinquencies from prior years, particularly in coastal tourism areas of Queensland as a result of regional economic pressures as well as our 2007 and 2008 vintages which have a higher concentration of self-employed borrowers. The adverse change in claims paid in the current year resulted in increased frequency and severity assumptions for our remaining portfolio of delinquent loans in Australia. In Canada, the loss ratio was flat as lower losses were offset by lower earned premiums. In Other Countries, the loss ratio increased as a result of increased losses from higher new delinquencies and continued aging of existing delinquencies, particularly in Ireland, and lower earned premiums.

The decrease in the expense ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was primarily attributable to an increase in net premiums written in Australia and relatively flat overall general expenses compared to the prior year.

Delinquent loans

The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our international mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
Canada:
Primary insured loans in-force		1,371,140			1,362,092			1,301,973
Delinquent loans		2,623			2,752			3,454
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.19	%		0.20	%		0.27	%
Flow loan in-force		1,074,281			1,064,942			1,011,823
Flow delinquent loans		2,335			2,477			3,113
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.22	%		0.23	%		0.31	%
Bulk loans in-force		296,859			297,150			290,150
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾		288			275			341
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.10	%		0.09	%		0.12	%

Australia:
Primary insured loans in-force		1,442,867			1,437,380			1,453,554
Delinquent loans		7,837			7,874			7,557
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.54	%		0.55	%		0.52	%
Flow loan in-force		1,295,907			1,289,200			1,307,167
Flow delinquent loans		7,559			7,626			7,387
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.58	%		0.59	%		0.57	%
Bulk loans in-force		146,960			148,180			146,387
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾		278			248			170
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.19	%		0.17	%		0.12	%

Other Countries:
Primary insured loans in-force		213,834			217,141			227,998
Delinquent loans		12,997			12,258			10,604
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		6.08	%		5.65	%		4.65	%
Flow loan in-force		147,406			149,036			158,741
Flow delinquent loans		9,598			8,919			7,718
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		6.51	%		5.98	%		4.86	%
Bulk loans in-force		66,428			68,105			69,257
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾		3,399			3,339			2,886
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		5.12	%		4.90	%		4.17	%

Total:
Primary insured loans in-force		3,027,841			3,016,613			2,983,525
Delinquent loans		23,457			22,884			21,615
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.77	%		0.76	%		0.72	%
Flow loan in-force		2,517,594			2,503,178			2,477,731
Flow delinquent loans		19,492			19,022			18,218
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.77	%		0.76	%		0.74	%
Bulk loans in-force		510,247			513,435			505,794
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾		3,965			3,862			3,397
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.78	%		0.75	%		0.67	%

⁽¹⁾	Included loans where we were in a secondary loss position for which no reserve was established due to an existing deductible. Excluding these loans, bulk delinquent loans were 3,942 as of March 31, 2012, 3,840 as of December 31, 2011 and 3,374 as of March 31, 2011.

In Canada, flow and bulk loans in-force increased primarily from continued growth. In Australia, flow loans in-force increased marginally during the current year as new policies written exceeded policy cancellations. In Other Countries, flow and bulk loans in-force decreased primarily from loss mitigation activities in Europe. In Canada, flow delinquent loans decreased primarily as a result of higher paid claims during the current year. In Australia, flow delinquent loans decreased marginally in the current year compared to December 31, 2011 as higher volumes of claims paid more than offset new delinquencies. In Europe, flow delinquent loans increased from higher delinquencies as a result of seasoning of our in-force blocks of business and regional economic pressures, primarily in Ireland.

U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Premiums	$	137		$	142		$	(5	)	(4	)%
Net investment income		23			33			(10	)	(30	)%
Net investment gains (losses)		27			1			26		NM	⁽¹⁾
Insurance and investment product fees and other		2			1			1		100	%

Total revenues		189			177			12		7	%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		197			279			(82	)	(29	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		34			39			(5	)	(13	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		1			2			(1	)	(50	)%

Total benefits and expenses		232			320			(88	)	(28	)%

Loss before income taxes		(43	)		(143	)		100		70	%
Benefit for income taxes		(17	)		(60	)		43		72	%

Net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		(26	)		(83	)		57		69	%
Adjustment to net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		(17	)		—			(17	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(43	)	$	(83	)	$	40		48	%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

The decrease in the net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders was mainly related to improved cure rates and fewer new delinquencies, partially offset by continued aging of existing delinquencies in the current year.

Revenues

Premiums decreased driven by lower insurance in-force and lower premiums assumed from an affiliated intercompany reinsurance agreement, partially offset by benefits associated with our previously implemented rate increases.

Net investment income decreased primarily from lower investment yields as a result of holding higher cash balances to meet claims-paying needs and lower average invested assets.

The increase in net investment gains was primarily driven by higher gains on the sale of investments from portfolio repositioning activities in the current year.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves decreased due to a decrease in change in reserves of $108 million, partially offset by an increase in net paid claims of $26 million. The decrease in change in reserves was primarily driven by improved cures and lower new delinquencies. The increase in net paid claims was attributable to continued aging of the delinquency inventory and a significant reduction in ceded claims under captive arrangements, coupled with a net $9 million portfolio settlement with one of our lenders in the current year.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased primarily from lower operating expenses as a result of a cost–saving initiative in 2011.

Benefit for income taxes.The effective tax rate decreased to 39.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from 42.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to changes in tax favored investment income.

U.S. Mortgage Insurance selected operating performance measures

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012		2011		2012 vs. 2011
Primary insurance in-force	$	113,800	$	123,300	$	(9,500	)	(8	)%
Risk in-force		26,900		28,800		(1,900	)	(7	)%
New insurance written		3,000		2,400		600		25	%
Net premiums written		142		142		—		—	%

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force

Primary insurance in-force decreased primarily as a result of rescission and other loss mitigation actions and a decline in our mortgage insurance market share due to tighter mortgage insurance guidelines and our pricing structure. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in new insurance written. In addition, risk in-force decreased due to tighter mortgage insurance guidelines as well as a continued weak housing market and reduced mortgage credit liquidity. Flow persistency was 81% and 86% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

New insurance written

New insurance written increased during the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily driven by an increase in the mortgage insurance refinance market, partially offset by a decline in our mortgage insurance market share due to tighter mortgage insurance guidelines and our pricing structure.

Net premiums written

Net premiums written remained flat as lower assumed reinsurance premiums were offset by higher new insurance written.

Loss and expense ratios

The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the dates indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Loss ratio		144	%		197	%		(53	)%
Expense ratio		25	%		29	%		(4	)%

The decrease in the loss ratio was primarily attributable to a decrease in change in reserves largely driven by improved cures and lower new delinquencies. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in net paid claims attributable to continued aging of the delinquency inventory and a significant reduction in ceded claims under captive arrangements, coupled with a net $9 million portfolio settlement with one of our lenders in the current year.

Delinquent loans

The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
Primary insurance:
Insured loans in-force		693,807			714,467			763,439
Delinquent loans		79,474			87,007			89,018
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		11.45	%		12.18	%		11.66	%

Flow loan in-force		616,623			633,246			673,276
Flow delinquent loans		76,478			83,931			85,758
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		12.40	%		13.25	%		12.74	%

Bulk loans in-force		77,184			81,221			90,163
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾		2,996			3,076			3,260
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		3.88	%		3.79	%		3.62	%

A minus and sub-prime loans in-force		65,833			68,487			75,421
A minus and sub-prime loans delinquent loans		17,680			19,884			20,656
Percentage of A minus and sub-prime delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		26.86	%		29.03	%		27.39	%

Pool insurance:
Insured loans in-force		13,942			14,418			17,421
Delinquent loans		695			778			913
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		4.98	%		5.40	%		5.24	%

⁽¹⁾	Included loans where we were in a secondary loss position for which no reserve was established due to an existing deductible. Excluding these loans, bulk delinquent loans were 1,522 as of March 31, 2012, 1,592 as of December 31, 2011 and 1,814 as of March 31, 2011.

Delinquency and foreclosure levels that developed principally in our 2006, 2007 and 2008 book years have remained high as the United States continues to experience an economic recession and weakness in its residential real estate market. These trends continue to be especially evident in Florida, California, Arizona and Nevada, as well as in our A minus, Alt-A, adjustable rate mortgages and certain 100% loan-to-value products. However, we have seen a decline in new delinquencies and improvement in cures.

The following tables set forth flow delinquencies, direct case reserves and risk in-force by aged missed payment status in our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	March 31, 2012
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Delinquencies		Direct case reserves⁽¹⁾		Risk in-force		Reserves as % of risk in-force
Payments in default:
3 payments or less		16,515	$	153	$	672		23	%
4 – 11 payments		23,244		613		1,016		60	%
12 payments or more		36,719		1,321		1,805		73	%

Total		76,478	$	2,087	$	3,493		60	%

⁽¹⁾	Direct flow case reserves exclude loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported and reinsurance reserves.


	December 31, 2011
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Delinquencies		Direct case reserves⁽¹⁾		Risk in-force		Reserves as % of risk in-force
Payments in default:
3 payments or less		21,272	$	193	$	835		23	%
4 – 11 payments		24,493		646		1,075		60	%
12 payments or more		38,166		1,360		1,870		73	%

Total		83,931	$	2,199	$	3,780		58	%

⁽¹⁾	Direct flow case reserves exclude loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported and reinsurance reserves.

Primary insurance delinquency rates differ from region to region in the United States at any one time depending upon economic conditions and cyclical growth patterns. The tables below set forth our primary delinquency rates for the various regions of the United States and the ten largest states by our risk in-force as of the dates indicated. Delinquency rates are shown by region based upon the location of the underlying property, rather than the location of the lender.


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2012			Percent of total reserves as of March 31, 2012⁽¹⁾			Delinquency rate
							March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
							March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
By Region:
Southeast⁽²⁾		22	%		35	%		16.25	%		17.10	%		16.26	%
South Central⁽³⁾		16			11			9.18	%		10.15	%		10.01	%
Northeast⁽⁴⁾		15			13			12.38	%		12.80	%		11.44	%
North Central⁽⁵⁾		12			12			11.18	%		11.89	%		11.06	%
Pacific⁽⁶⁾		11			12			11.64	%		12.52	%		13.64	%
Great Lakes⁽⁷⁾		9			7			8.48	%		9.00	%		8.44	%
Plains⁽⁸⁾		5			3			7.21	%		7.87	%		7.73	%
New England⁽⁹⁾		5			3			10.18	%		10.59	%		10.43	%
Mid-Atlantic⁽¹⁰⁾		5			4			10.04	%		10.73	%		10.09	%

Total		100	%		100	%		11.45	%		12.18	%		11.66	%

⁽¹⁾	Total reserves were $2,381 million as of March 31, 2012.

⁽²⁾	Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.

⁽³⁾	Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.

⁽⁴⁾	New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.

⁽⁵⁾	Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin.

⁽⁶⁾	Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

⁽⁷⁾	Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio.

⁽⁸⁾	Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.

⁽⁹⁾	Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont.

⁽¹⁰⁾	Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C. and West Virginia.


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2012			Percent of total reserves as of March 31, 2012⁽¹⁾			Delinquency rate
	Percent of primary risk in-force as of March 31, 2012			Percent of total reserves as of March 31, 2012⁽¹⁾			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
By State:
Florida		7	%		24	%		28.71	%		29.30	%		28.09	%
New York		7	%		5	%		10.43	%		10.66	%		9.59	%
Texas		7	%		3	%		7.43	%		8.34	%		7.63	%
California		6	%		6	%		9.68	%		10.86	%		12.89	%
Illinois		5	%		8	%		16.08	%		16.70	%		15.44	%
New Jersey		4	%		5	%		18.98	%		19.07	%		17.53	%
Georgia		4	%		4	%		13.78	%		14.79	%		15.12	%
North Carolina		4	%		3	%		10.97	%		11.89	%		10.73	%
Pennsylvania		4	%		2	%		10.86	%		11.85	%		10.32	%
Ohio		3	%		2	%		8.47	%		8.73	%		7.97	%

⁽¹⁾	Total reserves were $2,381 million as of March 31, 2012.

The following table sets forth the dispersion of our total reserves and primary insurance in-force and risk in-force by year of policy origination and average annual mortgage interest rate as of March 31, 2012:


(Amounts in millions)	Average rate			Percent of total reserves⁽¹⁾			Primary insurance in-force		Percent of total			Primary risk in-force		Percent of total
Policy Year
2001 and prior		7.76	%		2.0	%	$	2,365		2.1	%	$	599		2.3	%
2002		6.65	%		1.5			1,823		1.6			453		1.7
2003		5.64	%		3.7			7,572		6.7			1,251		4.7
2004		5.89	%		4.5			5,084		4.5			1,164		4.4
2005		5.97	%		12.7			8,568		7.5			2,223		8.3
2006		6.44	%		19.2			11,547		10.2			2,858		10.7
2007		6.49	%		39.2			25,971		22.8			6,431		24.1
2008		6.07	%		16.8			23,694		20.8			5,907		22.2
2009		5.09	%		0.3			6,489		5.7			1,207		4.5
2010		4.66	%		0.1			8,005		7.0			1,690		6.3
2011		4.43	%		—			9,606		8.4			2,181		8.2
2012		4.01	%		—			3,039		2.7			693		2.6

Total portfolio		5.93	%		100.0	%	$	113,763		100.0	%	$	26,657		100.0	%

⁽¹⁾	Total reserves were $2,381 million as of March 31, 2012.

Corporate and Runoff Division

Division results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Corporate and Runoff Division. See below for a discussion by segment and Corporate and Other activities.


	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Net operating income (loss) available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Runoff segment	$	35		$	1		$	34	NM	⁽¹⁾
Corporate and other activities		(49	)		(69	)		20	(29	)%

Total net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		(14	)		(68	)		54	(79	)%
Adjustment to net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment gains (losses), net of taxes and other adjustments		4			(7	)		11	(157	)%

Net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(10	)	$	(75	)	$	65	(87	)%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Runoff segment

Segment results of operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our Runoff segment for the periods indicated:


(Amounts in millions)	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Premiums	$	1		$	85		$	(84	)	(99	)%
Net investment income		38			34			4		12	%
Net investment gains (losses)		42			—			42		NM	⁽¹⁾
Insurance and investment product fees and other		52			59			(7	)	(12	)%

Total revenues		133			178			(45	)	(25	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and other changes in policy reserves		1			78			(77	)	(99	)%
Interest credited		33			35			(2	)	(6	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		19			46			(27	)	(59	)%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		(4	)		16			(20	)	(125	)%

Total benefits and expenses		49			175			(126	)	(72	)%

Income before income taxes		84			3			81		NM	⁽¹⁾
Provision for income taxes		22			1			21		NM	⁽¹⁾

Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		62			2			60		NM	⁽¹⁾
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		(27	)		(1	)		(26	)	NM	⁽¹⁾

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	35		$	1		$	34		NM	⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders increased primarily related to our variable annuity products largely driven by favorable equity market performance in the current year and a $7 million charge from the discontinuance of our variable annuity offerings in the prior year that did not recur.

Revenues

Premiums decreased driven by the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Net investment income increased primarily from higher policy loan income in the current year, partially offset by the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Net investment gains increased largely related to higher gains on embedded derivatives associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs in the current year and lower impairments related to our institutional products. This was partially offset by higher derivative losses in the current year.

Insurance and investment product fees and other decreased mainly attributable to lower average account values of our variable annuity products in the current year.

Benefits and expenses

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves decreased primarily attributable to the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011 and a decrease in our GMDB reserves in our variable annuity products due to favorable equity market impacts in the current year.

Interest credited decreased principally related to our institutional products from lower interest paid on our floating rate policyholder liabilities due to lower interest rates and a decrease in average outstanding liabilities.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased principally from a $9 million charge from the discontinuance of our variable annuity offerings in the prior year that did not recur and the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles decreased largely related to our variable annuity products from favorable equity market impacts and a $4 million favorable unlocking in the current year driven by lower surrenders. The decrease was also attributable to the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Provision for income taxes. The effective tax rate decreased to 26.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from 33.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily related to small pre-tax results in the prior year compared to the current year. The effective tax rate in the current year was also impacted by a higher proportion of tax benefits in the first quarter of 2012 to expected full year results.

Runoff selected operating performance measures

Variable annuity and variable life insurance products

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our variable annuity and variable life insurance products as of or for the dates indicated:


	As of or for the three months ended June 30,							As of or for the six months ended June 30,						As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010				2011			2010			2012			2011
Income Distribution Series⁽¹⁾
Account value, beginning of period	$	6,687		$	6,135			$	6,590		$	5,943		$	6,265		$	6,590
Deposits		33			141				150			314			26			117
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(171	)		(150	)			(356	)		(277	)		(174	)		(185	)

Net flows		(138	)		(9	)			(206	)		37			(148	)		(68	)
Interest credited and investment performance		57			(162	)			222			(16	)		281			165

Account value, end of period	$	6,606		$	5,964			$	6,606		$	5,964		$	6,398		$	6,687

Traditional variable annuities
Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period	$	2,096		$	2,048			$	2,078		$	2,016		$	1,766		$	2,078
Deposits		3			25				20			52			3			17
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(100	)		(70	)			(188	)		(135	)		(89	)		(88	)

Net flows		(97	)		(45	)	��		(168	)		(83	)		(86	)		(71	)
Interest credited and investment performance		13			(124	)			102			(54	)		139			89

Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period	$	2,012		$	1,879			$	2,012		$	1,879		$	1,819		$	2,096

Variable life insurance
Account value, beginning of period	$	319		$	303			$	313		$	298		$	284		$	313
Deposits		3			3				6			6			3			3
Surrenders, benefits and product charges		(11	)		(8	)			(22	)		(18	)		(8	)		(11	)

Net flows		(8	)		(5	)			(16	)		(12	)		(5	)		(8	)
Interest credited and investment performance		3			(19	)			17			(7	)		26			14

Account value, end of period	$	314		$	279			$	314		$	279		$	305		$	319

⁽¹⁾

The Income Distribution Series products are comprised of our deferred and immediate variable annuity products, including those variable annuity products with rider options that provide guaranteed income benefits, including GMWBs and certain types of guaranteed annuitization benefits. These products do not include fixed single premium immediate annuities or deferred annuities, which may also serve income distribution needs.

Income Distribution Series

Account value related to our ~~Income Distribution Series~~income distribution series products increased ~~from the prior year~~ mainly attributable to favorable equity market ~~growth,~~performance, partially offset by surrenders outpacing ~~sales. Beginning in the first quarter of 2011, we~~deposits. We no longer solicit sales of our variable annuities; however, we continue to service our existing block of business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts.

Traditional variable annuities

In our traditional variable annuities, the increase in account value ~~from the prior year~~ was ~~principally~~ as a result of favorable equity market ~~growth,~~performance, partially offset by surrenders outpacing ~~sales. Beginning in the first quarter of 2011, we~~deposits. We no longer solicit sales of our variable annuities; however, we continue to service our existing block of business and accept additional deposits on existing contracts.

Variable life insurance

We no longer solicit sales of ~~this product;~~variable life insurance; however, we continue to service our existing block of business.

~~Spread-based products~~

~~The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our spread-based products as of or for the dates indicated:~~

   As of or for the three
months ended June 30, As of or for the six
months ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 2010
Fixed annuities

Account value, beginning of period
   $ 10,660    $ 11,234    $ 10,819    $ 11,409
Deposits
   275    92    395    133
Surrenders, benefits and product charges
   (441 ) (304 ) (809 ) (616 )


Net flows
   (166 ) (212 ) (414 ) (483 )
Interest credited
   88    95    177    191


Account value, end of period
   $ 10,582    $ 11,117    $ 10,582    $ 11,117


Single premium immediate annuities

Account value, beginning of period
   $ 6,411    $ 6,593    $ 6,528    $ 6,675
Premiums and deposits
   85    100    170    195
Surrenders, benefits and product charges
   (253 ) (251 ) (509 ) (516 )


Net flows
   (168 ) (151 ) (339 ) (321 )
Interest credited
   82    87    165    175
Effect of accumulated net unrealized investment gains (losses)
   59    —      30    —


Account value, end of period
   $ 6,384    $ 6,529    $ 6,384    $ 6,529


Structured settlements

Account value, net of reinsurance, beginning of period
   $ 1,113    $ 1,115    $ 1,113    $ 1,115
Surrenders, benefits and product charges
   (14 ) (15 ) (29 ) (29 )


Net flows
   (14 ) (15 ) (29 ) (29 )
Interest credited
   14    15    29    29


Account value, net of reinsurance, end of period
   $ 1,113    $ 1,115    $ 1,113    $ 1,115


Total premiums from spread-based products
   $ 20    $ 32    $ 40    $ 68


Total deposits on spread-based products
   $ 340    $ 160    $ 525    $ 260

~~Fixed annuities~~

Account value of our fixed annuities decreased as surrenders exceeded deposits. Sales increased in the current year driven by reduced commission offerings but remain at lower levels given the low interest rate environment and other market conditions.

~~Single premium immediate annuities~~

~~Account value of our single premium immediate annuities decreased as payouts exceeded premiums and deposits. Sales have slowed given the low interest rate environment and other market conditions.~~

~~Structured settlements~~

~~We no longer solicit sales of this product; however, we continue to service our existing block of business.~~

~~International segment~~

~~Segment results of operations~~

~~Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our International segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Three months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
       2011         2010     2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 491    $ 495    $ (4 ) (1 )%
Net investment income
   152    127    25    20 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   6    1    5    NM ⁽¹⁾
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   9    (1 ) 10    NM ⁽¹⁾


Total revenues
   658    622    36    6 %


Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   142    163    (21 ) (13 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   205    205    —      —   %
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   72    67    5    7 %
Interest expense
   22    10    12    120 %


Total benefits and expenses
   441    445    (4 ) (1 )%


Income before income taxes
   217    177    40    23 %
Provision for income taxes
   71    35    36    103 %


Net income
   146    142    4    3 %
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
   36    35    1    3 %


Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   110    107    3    3 %
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   (3 ) (2 ) (1 ) (50 )%


Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 107    $ 105    $ 2    2 %

⁽¹⁾	~~We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.~~

~~The following table sets forth net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders for the businesses included in our International segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Three months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
       2011            2010        2011 vs. 2010
Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

International mortgage insurance
   $ 82       $ 93       $ (11 ) (12 )%
Lifestyle protection insurance
   25       12       13    108 %






Total net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 107       $ 105       $ 2    2 %

~~Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $11 million and $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

~~Our international mortgage insurance business decreased from higher taxes and interest expense, partially offset by lower overall losses and higher investment income.~~

Our lifestyle protection insurance business increased attributable to lower new claim registrations from improving economic conditions and a favorable impact from our re-pricing actions taken in 2010, partially offset by reduced levels of consumer lending.

~~Revenues~~

~~Premiums~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $17 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $21 million.~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $24 million and $20 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, the decrease in our international mortgage insurance business was primarily related to lower premiums in Canada and Australia attributable to seasoning of our in-force blocks of business. In addition, in Australia, lower ceded affiliated reinsurance was largely offset by a decrease in premiums from a lower rate of policy cancellations in the current year. In Europe, premiums decreased as a result of lender settlements in the prior year.

~~Net investment income~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $10 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business increased $15 million.~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $9 million and $4 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

~~Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our international mortgage insurance business was relatively flat as higher average invested assets were offset by lower investment yields.~~

The increase in our lifestyle protection insurance business was principally attributable to reinsurance arrangements accounted for under the deposit method as certain of these arrangements were in a higher gain position in the current year.

~~Insurance and investment product fees and other~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $6 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business increased $4 million.~~

~~The increase in our international mortgage insurance business was mainly attributable to currency transactions related to a foreign branch in the current year.~~

~~The increase in our lifestyle protection insurance business was mainly attributable to non-functional currency transactions attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Benefits and expenses~~

~~Benefits and other changes in policy reserves~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $1 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $22 million.~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $10 million and $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, the decrease in our international mortgage insurance business was primarily driven by lower losses in Europe related to lender settlements in the prior year and ongoing loss mitigation activities. In Australia, losses increased primarily as a result of higher new delinquencies from the seasoning of our in-force block of business and a higher average reserve per delinquency reflecting the economic impact of recent flooding, partially offset by lower paid claims. Losses in Canada were relatively flat as lower severity from overall economic improvement in the current year was offset by new delinquencies in Alberta which have a higher average reserve per delinquency.

~~The decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was largely attributable to a decrease in claim reserves from declining claim registrations.~~

~~Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $6 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $6 million.~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $4 million and $13 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

~~The increase in our international mortgage insurance business was driven by lower net deferred acquisition costs which were partially offset by lower overall expenses.~~

~~Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $2 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business increased $3 million.~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $2 million and $3 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our international mortgage insurance business was flat as higher amortization of deferred acquisition costs from the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business in Australia and Canada was offset by lower amortization in Europe as a result of lender settlements in the prior year.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our lifestyle protection insurance business was flat as our runoff block of business was offset by higher amortization of deferred acquisition costs in the current year due to a favorable client adjustment in the prior year that did not recur.

~~Interest expense~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance and lifestyle protection insurance businesses each increased $6 million.~~

The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates in both our international mortgage insurance and lifestyle protection businesses.

~~The increase in our international mortgage insurance business was related to Canada from the issuance of debt by our majority-owned subsidiary in June and December 2010.~~

The increase in our lifestyle protection insurance business was due to reinsurance arrangements accounted for under the deposit method of accounting as certain of these arrangements were in a higher loss position in the current year.

~~Provision for income taxes.~~The effective tax rate increased to 32.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 19.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to higher taxes in the current year as a result of a Canadian legislative change as compared to an Australian tax legislative benefit in the prior year. The Canadian legislation change passed in June 2011 will eliminate the Canadian government guarantee fund. The elimination of the guarantee fund is expected to increase the effective tax rate on our U.S. GAAP earnings as prior deductions for contributions to the fund lowered the effective tax rate on U.S. GAAP earnings. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $3 million and $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our International segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Six months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 968    $ 999    $ (31 ) (3 )%
Net investment income
   295    259    36    14 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   12    10    2    20 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   15    5    10    200 %


Total revenues
   1,290    1,273    17    1 %


Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   283    337    (54 ) (16 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   403    408    (5 ) (1 )%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   139    139    —      —   %
Interest expense
   41    33    8    24 %


Total benefits and expenses
   866    917    (51 ) (6 )%


Income before income taxes
   424    356    68    19 %
Provision for income taxes
   117    85    32    38 %


Net income
   307    271    36    13 %
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
   70    69    1    1 %


Net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   237    202    35    17 %
Adjustment to net income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   (6 ) (6 ) —      —   %


Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 231    $ 196    $ 35    18 %

   Six months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
     2011        2010      2011 vs. 2010
Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

International mortgage insurance
   $ 181       $ 172       $ 9       5 %
Lifestyle protection insurance
   50       24       26       108 %







Total net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ 231       $ 196       $ 35       18 %

~~Net operating income available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~

The six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $18 million and $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our international mortgage insurance business decreased from higher taxes and interest expense, partially offset by lower overall losses and higher investment income.

~~Revenues~~

~~Premiums~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $33 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $64 million.~~

The six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $41 million and $13 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, the decrease in our international mortgage insurance business was related to lower overall premiums attributable to the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business. In addition, in Australia, lower ceded affiliated reinsurance was more than offset by a decrease in premiums from a lower rate of policy cancellations and lower flow new business volume in the current year. In Europe, premiums decreased as a result of lender settlements in the prior year.

The decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was primarily attributable to our runoff block of business and a decrease in premium volume driven by reduced levels of consumer lending. Additionally, there was a favorable premium adjustment related to the timing of receiving client data which was partially offset by an unfavorable reinsurance adjustment in the first quarter of 2010 both of which were offset in expenses. These decreases were partially offset by re-pricing actions taken during 2010.

~~Net investment income~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $20 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business increased $16 million.~~

The six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $16 million and $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

The increase in our international mortgage insurance business was primarily as a result of higher average invested assets in Australia and Canada, partially offset by lower investment yields in Canada.

~~Insurance and investment product fees and other~~

~~Our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses each increased $5 million.~~

~~The increase in our international mortgage insurance business was mainly attributable to currency transactions related to a foreign branch in the current year.~~

~~The increase in our lifestyle protection insurance business was mainly attributable to non-functional currency transactions as the result of changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Benefits and expenses~~

~~Benefits and other changes in policy reserves~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $4 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $58 million.~~

The six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $17 million and $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our international mortgage insurance business decrease was primarily driven by lower losses in Europe related to lender settlements in the prior year and ongoing loss mitigation activities. In Australia, losses increased primarily as a result of higher new delinquencies from seasoning of our in-force block of business and a higher average reserve per delinquency reflecting the economic impact of the recent flooding. Partially offsetting this increase was lower paid claims in Australia as a result of lender settlements in the prior year. Losses in Canada were relatively flat as lower severity from overall economic improvement in the current year was offset by new delinquencies in Alberta which have a higher average reserve per delinquency.

~~The decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was largely attributable to a decrease in claim reserves from declining claim registrations.~~

~~Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $7 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $12 million.~~

The six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $6 million and $9 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

~~Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our international mortgage insurance business was relatively flat as lower net deferred acquisition costs were offset by lower overall expenses.~~

The decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was driven by a decrease in paid commissions related to a decline in new business, partially offset by an increase in profit commissions driven by lower claims. Additionally, there was a favorable commission adjustment in the first quarter of 2010 that was offset in premiums.

~~Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $7 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $7 million.~~

The six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $4 million and $2 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage and lifestyle protection insurance businesses, respectively.

The increase in our international mortgage insurance business resulted primarily from an increase related to software and higher amortization of deferred acquisition costs from the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business in Australia and Canada. This increase was partially offset by lower amortization in Europe as the result of lender settlements in the prior year.

The decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was primarily attributable to our runoff block of business. Additionally, there was an unfavorable adjustment in the first quarter of 2010 related to the timing of receiving client data that was offset in premiums.

~~Interest expense~~

~~Our international mortgage insurance business increased $12 million and our lifestyle protection insurance business decreased $4 million.~~

~~The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $1 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates in our international mortgage insurance business.~~

~~The increase in our international mortgage insurance business was related to Canada from the issuance of debt by our majority-owned subsidiary in June and December 2010.~~

The decrease in our lifestyle protection insurance business was due to reinsurance arrangements accounted for under the deposit method of accounting as certain of these arrangements were in a lower loss position in the current year.

~~Provision for income taxes.~~The effective tax rate increased to 27.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 23.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to higher taxes in the current year as a result of a Canadian legislative change as compared to an Australian tax legislative benefit in the prior year. The Canadian legislation change passed in June 2011 will eliminate the Canadian government guarantee fund. The elimination of the guarantee fund is expected to increase the effective tax rate on our U.S. GAAP earnings as prior deductions for contributions to the fund lowered the effective tax rate on U.S. GAAP earnings. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $7 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates for our international mortgage insurance business.

~~International selected operating performance measures~~

~~International mortgage insurance~~

~~The following tables set forth selected operating performance measures regarding our international mortgage insurance business as of or for the dates indicated:~~

   As of June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011    2010    2011 vs. 2010
Primary insurance in-force
   $ 597,900       $ 484,100       $ 113,800       24 %
Risk in-force
   201,600       163,000       38,600       24 %

   Three months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change Six months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011    2010    2011 vs. 2010 2011    2010    2011 vs. 2010
New insurance written
   $ 17,800       $ 14,900       $ 2,900       19 % $ 30,500       $ 28,800       $ 1,700       6 %
Net premiums written
   257       218       39       18 % 429       381       48       13 %
Net earned premiums
   268       251       17       7 % 530       497       33       7 %

~~Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force~~

Our businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Canada currently provide 100% coverage on the majority of the loans we insure in those markets. For the purpose of representing our risk in-force, we have computed an

“effective” risk in-force amount, which recognizes that the loss on any particular loan will be reduced by the net proceeds received upon sale of the property. Effective risk in-force has been calculated by applying to insurance in-force a factor that represents our highest expected average per-claim payment for any one underwriting year over the life of our businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, this factor was 35%.

Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force increased primarily as a result of new insurance written in Canada and Australia, partially offset by cancellations in Australia and loss mitigation activities in Europe during 2010. Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force included increases of $92.7 billion and $31.3 billion, respectively, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates as of June 30, 2011.

~~New insurance written~~

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, new insurance written increased primarily as a result of increases in bulk transactions in Canada, Australia and Europe in the current year. These increases were partially offset by decreases in flow new insurance written in Australia and Canada as a result of smaller mortgage originations markets. In addition, flow new insurance written declined in Europe due to lower volume from existing lenders. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $1.8 billion attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, excluding the effects of foreign exchange, new insurance written decreased primarily as a result of decreases in flow new insurance written in Australia and Canada as a result of smaller mortgage originations markets. In addition, flow new insurance written declined in Europe due to lower volume from existing lenders. These decreases were partially offset by increases in bulk transactions in Australia, Europe and Canada in the current year. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $2.8 billion attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Net premiums written and net earned premiums~~

Most of our international mortgage insurance policies provide for single premiums at the time that loan proceeds are advanced. We initially record the single premiums to unearned premium reserves and recognize the premiums earned over time in accordance with the expected pattern of risk emergence. As of June 30, 2011, our unearned premium reserves were $3.1 billion, including an increase of $0.4 billion attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates, compared to $2.8 billion as of June 30, 2010. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, our unearned premium reserves decreased primarily related to seasoning of our in-force block of business.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, net premiums written increased primarily from higher average price, bulk new insurance written in Australia, Canada and Europe and lower ceded affiliated reinsurance premiums in Australia in the current year. These increases were partially offset by lower flow net premiums written in Canada as an increase in market share was more than offset by lower business volume with loan-to-value ratios of more than 90%. The three and six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $22 million and $33 million, respectively, attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, excluding the effects of foreign exchange, net earned premiums decreased primarily related to lower premiums in Canada and Australia attributable to the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business. In addition, in Australia, lower ceded affiliated reinsurance was largely offset by a decrease in premiums from a lower rate of policy cancellations in the current year. In Europe, premiums decreased as a result of lender settlements in the prior year. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $24 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, excluding the effects of foreign exchange, net earned premiums decreased related to lower overall premiums attributable to the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business. In addition, in Australia, lower ceded affiliated reinsurance was more than offset by a decrease in premiums from a lower rate of policy cancellations and lower flow new business volume in the current year. In Europe, premiums decreased as a result of lender settlements in the prior year. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $41 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.

~~Loss and expense ratios~~

~~The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our international mortgage insurance business for the dates indicated:~~

   Three months ended
June 30, Increase (decrease) Six months ended
June 30, Increase (decrease)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010 2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Loss ratio
   40 % 42 % (2 )% 41 % 43 % (2 )%
Expense ratio
   31 % 33 % (2 )% 37 % 38 % (1 )%

The decrease in the loss ratio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily attributable to lower losses in Europe related to lender settlements in the prior year and ongoing loss mitigation activities. In Australia, the loss ratio increased primarily from higher reserves driven by higher new delinquencies from the seasoning of our in-force block of business and the economic impact of the recent flooding.

~~The decrease in the expense ratio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in net premiums written, partially offset by higher general expenses.~~

~~Delinquent loans~~

~~The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our international mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:~~

June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010 June 30, 2010
Primary insurance:

Insured loans in-force
3,004,011    2,986,059    2,938,624
Delinquent loans
22,495    21,082    22,093
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
0.75 % 0.71 % 0.75 %
Flow loans in-force
2,486,842    2,468,354    2,447,543
Flow delinquent loans
19,070    17,684    19,219
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
0.77 % 0.72 % 0.79 %
Bulk loans in-force
517,169    517,705    491,081
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾
3,425    3,398    2,874
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
0.66 % 0.66 % 0.59 %

⁽¹⁾	Included loans where we were in a secondary loss position for which no reserve was established due to an existing deductible. Excluding these loans, bulk delinquent loans were 3,403 as of June 30, 2011, 3,376 as of December 31, 2010 and 2,858 as of June 30, 2010.

Flow loans in-force increased primarily from growth in Canada during the current year while bulk loans in-force decreased primarily due to cancellations in Australia. Delinquent loans increased from higher delinquencies in Australia and Europe as a result of the seasoning of our in-force blocks of business, partially offset by lower delinquencies in Canada and Mexico.

~~Lifestyle protection insurance~~Institutional products

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures regarding our ~~lifestyle protection insurance business and other related consumer protection insurance~~institutional products as of or for the ~~periods~~dates indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change Six months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
     2011        2010      2011 vs. 2010   2011        2010      2011 vs. 2010
Lifestyle protection insurance gross written premiums, premium equivalents and deposits
   $ 469       $ 424       $ 45    11 % $ 892       $ 861       $ 31    4 %
Net earned premiums
   223       244       (21 ) (9 )% 438       502       (64 ) (13 )%


	As of or for the three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2012			2011
GICs, FABNs and Funding Agreements⁽¹⁾
Account value, beginning of period	$	2,623		$	3,717
Surrenders and benefits		(55	)		(435	)

Net flows		(55	)		(435	)
Interest credited		21			33
Foreign currency translation		5			2

Account value, end of period	$	2,594		$	3,317

~~Gross written premiums, premium equivalents and deposits~~

⁽¹⁾	We have included in surrenders the early retirement of institutional contracts at a discount to contract values.

~~Gross written premiums, premium equivalents and deposits, gross of ceded reinsurance and cancellations, increased~~Account value related to our institutional products decreased from ~~sales growth. The three and six months ended June 30, 2011 included increases of $40 million and $27 million, respectively,~~the prior year mainly attributable to ~~changes in foreign exchange rates.~~

~~Net earned premiums~~

~~For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the decrease was primarily attributable~~scheduled maturities of these products. Interest credited declined due to ~~our runoff block of business and~~ a decrease in ~~premium volume driven by reduced levels of consumer lending. The three months ended June 30, 2011 included an increase of $20 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange~~average outstanding liabilities and lower average crediting rates.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the decrease was primarily attributable to our runoff business and a decrease in premium volume driven by reduced levels of consumer lending. Additionally, there was a favorable premium adjustment related to the timing of receiving client data which was partially offset by an unfavorable reinsurance adjustment We had no new sales in the ~~first quarter~~current year as we explore the issuance of ~~2010, both of which were offset in expenses. The six months ended June 30, 2011 included~~our institutional contracts on an ~~increase of $13 million attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.~~opportunistic basis.

~~U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment~~Corporate and Other Activities

~~Segment results~~Results of operations

Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Three months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
       2011         2010     2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 142    $ 153    $ (11 ) (7 )%
Net investment income
   26    31    (5 ) (16 )%
Net investment gains (losses)
   1    (3 ) 4    133 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   1    —      1    —   %


Total revenues
   170    181    (11 ) (6 )%


Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   526    216    310    144 %
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   35    33    2 6 %
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   4    4    —      —   %


Total benefits and expenses
   565    253    312    123 %


Loss before income taxes
   (395 ) (72 ) (323 ) NM ⁽¹⁾
Benefit for income taxes
   (143 ) (29 ) (114 ) NM ⁽¹⁾


Net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   (252 ) (43 ) (209 ) NM ⁽¹⁾
Adjustment to net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   (1 ) 3    (4 ) (133 )%


Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ (253 ) $ (40 ) $ (213 ) NM ⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾	~~We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.~~

~~Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~

~~The increase in the net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders was mainly related to the reserve strengthening in the second quarter of~~March 31, 2011 ~~from a decline in the cure rates and continued aging of existing delinquent loans.~~

~~Revenues~~

Premiums decreased driven by lower new insurance written as a result of a smaller mortgage insurance origination market and lower premiums assumed from an affiliate under an intercompany reinsurance agreement, partially offset by less policy coverage rescission activity.

~~Net investment income decreased primarily due to lower average invested assets and lower yield from holding higher cash balances.~~

~~The increase in net investment gains was primarily driven by higher gains on the sale of investments from portfolio repositioning activities.~~

~~Benefits and expenses~~

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased due to an increase in change in reserves of $343 million, partially offset by a decrease in net paid claims of $33 million. In the second quarter of 2011, we strengthened reserves by $299 million primarily related to a decline in cure rates during the second quarter of 2011 for delinquent loans and continued aging of existing delinquencies. Of the reserve strengthening, approximately $102 million was associated with worsening trends in recent experience. These trends were associated with a range of factors, including reduced opportunities to mitigate losses through loan modification actions due to a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies shifting to a more aged delinquency status. Specifically, reduced cure rates were driven by lower levels of borrower self-cures and lender loan modifications outside of government-sponsored modification programs. In addition, our expectations going forward include further deterioration in cure rates from a continuation of current market trends and an ongoing weakness in the U.S. residential real estate market. Accordingly, these expectations going forward resulted in an additional reserve strengthening of approximately $197 million in the second quarter of 2011. These increases were partially offset by lower new delinquencies. The decrease in net paid claims was attributable to lower claim counts and lower average claim payments reflecting lower loan balances.

~~Benefit for income taxes.~~The effective tax rate decreased to 36.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 40.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to tax favored investment benefits in relation to pre-tax results in the current year compared to the prior year.

~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the periods indicated:~~

   Six months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Premiums
   $ 284    $ 295    $ (11 ) (4 )%
Net investment income
   59    61    (2 ) (3 )%
Net investment gains (losses)
   2    1    1    100 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   2    5    (3 ) (60 )%


Total revenues
   347    362    (15 ) (4 )%


Benefits and expenses:

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves
   805    412    393    95 %
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   69    67    2    3 %
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   8    7    1    14 %


Total benefits and expenses
   882    486    396    81 %


Loss before income taxes
   (535 ) (124 ) (411 ) NM ⁽¹⁾
Benefit for income taxes
   (202 ) (48 ) (154 ) NM ⁽¹⁾


Net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   (333 ) (76 ) (257 ) NM ⁽¹⁾
Adjustment to net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   (1 ) —      (1 ) —   %


Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ (334 ) $ (76 ) $ (258 ) NM ⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾	~~We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.~~

~~Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~

The increase in the net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders was mainly related to the reserve strengthening in the second quarter of 2011 from a decline in the cure rates and continued aging of existing delinquent loans.

~~Revenues~~

~~Net investment income decreased primarily related to lower average invested assets, partially offset by a preferred stock dividend in the current year.~~

~~The increase in net investment gains was primarily driven by gains on the sale of investments from portfolio repositioning activities.~~

~~Insurance and investment product fees and other income decreased primarily from the commutation of a captive trust in the prior year that did not recur.~~

~~Benefits and expenses~~

Benefits and other changes in policy reserves increased due to an increase in change in reserves of $601 million, partially offset by a decrease in net paid claims of $208 million. In the second quarter of 2011, we strengthened reserves by $299 million primarily related to a decline in cure rates in the second quarter of 2011 for delinquent loans and continued aging of existing delinquencies. Of the reserve strengthening, approximately $102 million was associated with worsening trends in recent experience. These trends were associated with a range of factors, including reduced opportunities to mitigate losses through loan modification actions due to a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies shifting to a more aged delinquency status. Specifically, reduced cure rates were driven by lower levels of borrower self-cures and lender loan modifications outside of government-sponsored modification programs. In addition, our expectations going forward include further deterioration in cure rates from a continuation of current market trends and an ongoing weakness in the U.S. residential real estate market. Accordingly, these expectations going forward resulted in an additional reserve strengthening of approximately $197 million in the second quarter of 2011. These increases were partially offset by lower new delinquencies. The decrease in net paid claims was attributable to lower claim counts and lower average claim payments reflecting lower loan balances. The prior year also included a settlement with a counterparty related to our GSE Alt-A business of $5 million, consisting of net paid claims of $180 million and a decrease in change in reserves of $185 million that did not recur.

~~Benefit for income taxes.~~The effective tax rate decreased to 37.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 38.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to tax favored investment benefits in relation to pre-tax results in the current year compared to the prior year.

~~U.S. Mortgage Insurance selected operating performance measures~~

~~The following tables set forth selected operating performance measures regarding our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment as of or for the dates indicated:~~

   As of June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011    2010    2011 vs. 2010
Primary insurance in-force
   $ 120,900       $ 131,900       $ (11,000 ) (8 )%
Risk in-force
   28,300       30,700       (2,400 ) (8 )%

   Three months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change Six months ended
June 30,    Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
       2011            2010        2011 vs. 2010 2011    2010        2011 vs. 2010
New insurance written
   $ 1,900       $ 2,200       $ (300 ) (14 )% $ 4,300       $ 3,900       $ 400    10 %
Net premiums written
   145       152       (7 ) (5 )% 287       294       (7 ) (2 )%

~~Primary insurance in-force and risk in-force~~

Primary insurance in-force decreased primarily as a result of rescission and other loss mitigation actions, as well as a smaller mortgage insurance market in the current year. Risk in-force decreased due to tighter mortgage insurance guidelines and mortgage lender underwriting standards as well as a weak housing market and reduced mortgage credit liquidity. Flow persistency was 86% and 87% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

~~New insurance written~~

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, new insurance written decreased primarily driven by a slight decline in our mortgage insurance market share, coupled with a decline in mortgage originations. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, new insurance written increased primarily driven by an increase in the overall mortgage insurance market following FHA pricing changes.

~~Net premiums written~~

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, net premiums written decreased due to lower new insurance written as a result of a decline in our mortgage insurance market share and lower premiums assumed from an affiliate under an intercompany reinsurance agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net premiums written decreased due to lower reinsurance premiums, partially offset by higher new insurance written as a result of an overall increase in the mortgage insurance market.

~~Loss and expense ratios~~

~~The following table sets forth the loss and expense ratios for our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment for the dates indicated:~~

   Three months ended
June 30, Increase (decrease) Six months ended
June 30, Increase (decrease)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010 2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Loss ratio
   369 % 141 % 228 % 283 % 140 % 143 %
Expense ratio
   27 % 25 % 2 % 27 % 25 % 2 %

The loss ratio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased primarily attributable to a reserve strengthening of $299 million primarily related to a decline in cure rates during the second quarter of 2011 for delinquent loans and continued aging of existing delinquencies. Of the reserve strengthening, approximately $102 million was associated with worsening trends in recent experience. These trends were associated with a range of factors, including reduced opportunities to mitigate losses through loan modification actions due to a higher percentage of early stage delinquencies shifting to a more aged delinquency status. Specifically, reduced

cure rates were driven by lower levels of borrower self-cures and lender loan modifications outside of government-sponsored modification programs. In addition, our expectations going forward include further deterioration in cure rates from a continuation of current market trends and an ongoing weakness in the U.S. residential real estate market. Accordingly, these expectations going forward resulted in an additional reserve strengthening of approximately $197 million in the second quarter of 2011. These increases were partially offset by lower new delinquencies and a decrease in paid claims attributable to lower claim counts and lower average claim payments reflecting lower loan balances. The six months ended June 30, 2010 also included a settlement with a counterparty related to our GSE Alt-A business of $5 million, consisting of net paid claims of $180 million and a decrease in change in reserves of $185 million.

~~The expense ratio increased as a result of a decrease in net premiums written for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.~~

~~Delinquent loans~~

~~The following table sets forth the number of loans insured, the number of delinquent loans and the delinquency rate for our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:~~

   June 30, 2011 December 31, 2010 June 30, 2010
Primary insurance:

Insured loans in-force
   746,740    781,024    821,617
Delinquent loans
   87,464    95,395    101,759
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
   11.71 % 12.21 % 12.39 %
Flow loans in-force
   658,251    687,964    723,301
Flow delinquent loans
   84,442    92,225    98,771
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
   12.83 % 13.41 % 13.66 %
Bulk loans in-force
   88,489    93,060    98,316
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾
   3,022    3,170    2,988
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
   3.42 % 3.41 % 3.04 %
A minus and sub-prime loans in-force
   73,211    77,822    83,859
A minus and sub-prime delinquent loans
   20,284    22,827    24,867
Percentage of A minus and sub-prime delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
   27.71 % 29.33 % 29.65 %
Pool insurance:

Insured loans in-force
   16,943    17,880    19,473
Delinquent loans
   931    989    831
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)
   5.49 % 5.53 % 4.27 %

⁽¹⁾	Included loans where we were in a secondary loss position for which no reserve was established due to an existing deductible. Excluding these loans, bulk delinquent loans were 1,569 as of June 30, 2011, 1,713 as of December 31, 2010 and 1,478 as of June 30, 2010.

Delinquency and foreclosure levels that developed principally in our 2006, 2007 and 2008 book years have remained high as the United States continues to experience an economic recession and weakness in its residential real estate market. These trends continue to be especially evident in Florida, California, Arizona and Nevada, as well as in our A minus, Alt-A, adjustable rate mortgages (“ARMs”) and certain 100% loan-to-value products. However, we have seen a decline in new delinquencies.

~~The following tables set forth flow delinquencies, direct case reserves and risk in-force by aged missed payment status in our U.S. mortgage insurance portfolio as of the dates indicated:~~

   June 30, 2011
(Dollar amounts in millions)
   Delinquencies    Direct case
reserves ⁽¹⁾    Risk
in-force    Reserves as %
of risk in-force
Payments in default:

3 payments or less
   20,255       $ 193       $ 810       24 %
4 – 11 payments
   26,099       714       1,186       60 %
12 payments or more
   38,088       1,349       1,901       71 %







Total
   84,442       $ 2,256       $ 3,897       58 %

⁽¹⁾	~~Direct flow case reserves exclude loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported and reinsurance reserves.~~

   December 31, 2010
(Dollar amounts in millions)
   Delinquencies    Direct case
reserves ⁽¹⁾    Risk
in-force    Reserves as %
of risk in-force
Payments in default:

3 payments or less
   24,104       $ 152       $ 959       16 %
4 – 11 payments
   33,635       754       1,546       49 %
12 payments or more
   34,486       1,142       1,757       65 %







Total
   92,225       $ 2,048       $ 4,262       48 %

⁽¹⁾	~~Direct flow case reserves exclude loss adjustment expenses, incurred but not reported and reinsurance reserves.~~

   Percent of primary
risk in-force as of
June 30, 2011 Percent of total
reserves as of
June 30, 2011 ⁽¹⁾ Delinquency rate
   June 30,
2011 December 31,
2010 June 30,
2010
By Region:

Southeast⁽²⁾
   22 % 35 % 16.37 % 16.79 % 17.06 %
South Central⁽³⁾
   16    12    9.90 % 11.00 % 11.41 %
Northeast⁽⁴⁾
   14    12    11.71 % 11.66 % 10.85 %
North Central⁽⁵⁾
   12    11    11.36 % 11.51 % 11.50 %
Pacific⁽⁶⁾
   11    13    13.29 % 14.39 % 15.83 %
Great Lakes⁽⁷⁾
   9    7    8.49 % 8.92 % 9.08 %
Plains⁽⁸⁾
   6    3    7.75 % 8.14 % 7.59 %
New England⁽⁹⁾
   5    3    10.36 % 10.71 % 11.11 %
Mid-Atlantic⁽¹⁰⁾
   5    4    10.12 % 10.67 % 11.23 %


Total
   100 % 100 % 11.71 % 12.21 % 12.39 %

⁽¹⁾	~~Total reserves were $2,506 million as of June 30, 2011.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah.~~

⁽⁴⁾	~~New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.~~

⁽⁵⁾	~~Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri and Wisconsin.~~

⁽⁶⁾	~~Alaska, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.~~

⁽⁷⁾	~~Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio.~~

⁽⁸⁾	~~Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.~~

⁽⁹⁾	~~Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont.~~

⁽¹⁰⁾	~~Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C. and West Virginia.~~

   Percent of primary
risk in-force as of
June 30, 2011 Percent of total
reserves as of
June 30, 2011 ⁽¹⁾ Delinquency rate
   June 30,
2011 December 31,
2010 June 30,
2010
By State:

Florida
   7 % 24 % 28.35 % 28.31 % 28.86 %
Texas
   7 % 3 % 7.61 % 8.71 % 8.80 %
New York
   7 % 5 % 9.71 % 9.76 % 8.88 %
California
   5 % 7 % 12.24 % 13.99 % 16.40 %
Illinois
   5 % 7 % 15.90 % 15.79 % 15.79 %
Georgia
   4 % 4 % 14.70 % 16.16 % 17.13 %
North Carolina
   4 % 3 % 10.93 % 11.23 % 11.12 %
New Jersey
   4 % 5 % 17.73 % 17.30 % 16.36 %
Pennsylvania
   4 % 2 % 10.81 % 10.94 % 10.34 %
Ohio
   3 % 2 % 8.00 % 8.19 % 7.85 %

⁽¹⁾	~~Total reserves were $2,506 million as of June 30, 2011.~~

(Amounts in millions)
   Average
rate Percent of total
reserves⁽¹⁾ Primary
insurance
in-force    Percent
of total Primary
risk
in-force    Percent
of total
Policy Year

2000 and prior
   7.84 % 1.3 % $ 1,876       1.6 % $ 481       1.7 %
2001
   7.58 % 0.7    954       0.8    240       0.9
2002
   6.64 % 1.5    2,358       2.0    581       2.1
2003
   5.65 % 3.7    9,603       7.9    1,622       5.8
2004
   5.88 % 4.2    5,963       4.9    1,354       4.8
2005
   5.98 % 12.6    9,710       8.0    2,501       8.9
2006
   6.49 % 19.7    13,144       10.9    3,216       11.5
2007
   6.56 % 40.0    29,077       24.0    7,171       25.6
2008
   6.15 % 15.8    26,922       22.3    6,685       23.8
2009
   5.08 % 0.3    7,982       6.6    1,386       4.9
2010
   4.66 % 0.2    9,085       7.5    1,872       6.7
2011
   4.63 % —      4,264       3.5    920       3.3






Total portfolio
   6.08 % 100.0 % $ 120,938       100.0 % $ 28,029       100.0 %

⁽¹⁾	~~Total reserves were $2,506 million as of June 30, 2011.~~

~~Corporate and Other~~

~~Results of Operations~~

~~Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

The following table sets forth the results of operations relating to Corporate and Other activities for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2011 vs. 2010					2012			2011			2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
Net investment income	$	43		$	35		$	8		23	%	$	—		$	(1	)	$	1		100	%
Net investment gains (losses)		(1	)		(68	)		67		99	%		(35	)		(14	)		(21	)	(150	)%
Insurance and investment product fees and other		1			(3	)		4		133	%		21			7			14		200	%

Total revenues		43			(36	)		79		NM	⁽¹⁾		(14	)		(8	)		(6	)	(75	)%

Benefits and expenses:
Interest credited		31			35			(4	)	(11	)%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals		—			9			(9	)	(100	)%		30			2			28		NM	⁽¹⁾
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles		3			4			(1	)	(25	)%		3			3			—		—	%
Interest expense		86			70			16		23	%		62			82			(20	)	(24	)%

Total benefits and expenses		120			118			2		2	%		95			87			8		9	%

Loss before income taxes		(77	)		(154	)		77		50	%		(109	)		(95	)		(14	)	(15	)%
Benefit for income taxes		—			(51	)		51		100	%		(37	)		(18	)		(19	)	(106	)%

Net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders		(77	)		(103	)		26		25	%		(72	)		(77	)		5		6	%
Adjustment to net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:
Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments		—			42			(42	)	(100	)%		23			8			15		188	%

Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders	$	(77	)	$	(61	)	$	(16	)	(26	)%	$	(49	)	$	(69	)	$	20		29	%

⁽¹⁾	We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.

Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders

We reported a ~~higher~~lower net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders in the current year compared to the prior year primarily as a result of ~~lower~~higher tax benefits and ~~higher~~lower interest expense, partially offset by ~~an increase~~higher operating expenses in ~~net investment income and lower operating expenses.~~the current year.

Revenues

~~Higher~~Net investment ~~income was~~losses increased primarily ~~driven by higher dividend income from equity investments and $3 million of higher gains~~ related to ~~limited partnerships accounted for under~~higher net losses from the ~~equity method~~sale of investment securities related to portfolio repositioning and derivative losses, partially offset by lower impairments in the current year.

~~Net investment losses decreased primarily related to derivative activity associated with certain consolidated securitization entities and lower impairments.~~

Insurance and investment product fees and other ~~increased~~decreased mainly attributable to ~~non-functional currency transactions attributable~~higher income related to ~~changes in foreign exchange rates in the current year.~~our reverse mortgage business.

Benefits and expenses

~~The decrease in interest credited was attributable to lower interest rates on interest paid on our floating rate policyholder liabilities~~Acquisition and ~~a decrease in average outstanding liabilities.~~

~~Operating~~operating expenses, ~~decreased~~net of deferrals, increased as a result of higher ~~allocated~~unallocated expenses to ~~the~~our operating segments in the current year and lower overall expenses in the prior year. There was also an increase of $14 million associated with our reverse mortgage business primarily related to broker commissions on loans.

Interest expense ~~increased~~decreased mainly attributable to a $20 million favorable adjustment in the current year related to the ~~debt issuances~~Tax Matters Agreement with our former parent company and the maturity of our ¥57.0 billion of senior notes in June ~~and November 2010 and~~2011, partially offset by the debt issuance in March 2011.

The ~~decrease~~increase in the income tax benefit was primarily related to ~~tax expense allocated to Corporate and Other activities in the current year.~~

~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

~~The following table sets forth the~~lower pre-tax results ~~of operations relating to Corporate and Other activities for the periods indicated:~~

   Six months ended
June 30, Increase
(decrease) and
percentage
change
(Amounts in millions)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
Revenues:

Net investment income
   $ 69    $ 44    $ 25    57 %
Net investment gains (losses)
   (8 ) (84 ) 76    90 %
Insurance and investment product fees and other
   3 —      3    NM ⁽¹⁾


Total revenues
   64    (40 ) 104    NM ⁽¹⁾


Benefits and expenses:

Interest credited
   64    74    (10 ) (14 )%
Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals
   (5 ) 17    (22 ) (129 )%
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles
   6    8    (2 ) (25 )%
Interest expense
   168    140    28    20 %


Total benefits and expenses
   233    239    (6 ) (3 )%


Loss before income taxes
   (169 ) (279 ) 110    39 %
Benefit for income taxes
   (16 ) (208 ) 192    92 %


Net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   (153 ) (71 ) (82 ) (115 )%
Adjustments to net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders:

Net investment (gains) losses, net of taxes and other adjustments
   4    53    (49 ) (92 )%
Net tax benefit related to separation from our former parent
   —      (106 ) 106    100 %


Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders
   $ (149 ) $ (124 ) $ (25 ) (20 )%

⁽¹⁾	~~We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 200%.~~

~~Net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~

~~We reported a higher net operating loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders~~ in the current year as compared to the prior ~~year primarily as a result of lower tax benefits and higher interest expense, partially offset by an increase in net investment income and lower operating expenses.~~

~~Revenues~~

Higher investment income was primarily driven by the improved performance of limited partnership investments accounted for under the equity method. Net investment income included $4 million of gains related to limited partnerships during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to losses of $21 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

~~Net investment losses decreased primarily related to derivative activity associated with certain consolidated securitization entities and lower impairments.~~

~~Insurance and investment product fees and other increased mainly attributable to non-functional currency transactions attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates in the current~~ year.

~~Benefits and expenses~~

~~The decrease in interest credited was attributable to lower interest rates on interest paid on our floating rate policyholder liabilities and a decrease in average outstanding liabilities.~~

~~Operating expenses decreased as a result of higher allocated expenses to the operating segments in the current year.~~

~~Interest expense increased related to the debt issuances in June and November 2010 and March 2011.~~

~~The decrease in the income tax benefit was primarily related to changes in uncertain tax benefits in the prior year related to separation from our former parent.~~

Investments and Derivative Instruments

Investment results

The following ~~tables set~~table sets forth information about our investment income, excluding net investment gains (losses), for each component of our investment portfolio for the periods indicated:

   Three months ended
June 30, Increase (decrease)
   2011 2010 2011 vs. 2010
(Amounts in millions)
   Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount
Fixed maturity securities—taxable
   5.2 % $ 693    5.0 % $ 646    0.2 % $ 47
Fixed maturity securities—non-taxable
   4.1 % 10    4.3 % 16    (0.2 )% (6 )
Commercial mortgage loans
   5.6 % 92    5.5 % 99    0.1 % (7 )
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities
   7.8 % 9    7.3 % 10    0.5 % (1 )
Equity securities
   11.7 % 10    11.8 % 5    (0.1 )% 5
Other invested assets
   16.9 % 55    14.9 % 39    2.0 % 16
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities
   0.2 % —      —   % —      0.2 % —
Policy loans
   7.9 % 30    7.7 % 28    0.2 % 2
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
   0.7 % 6    0.3 % 4    0.4 % 2

Gross investment income before expenses and fees
   5.3 % 905    4.9 % 847    0.4 % 58
Expenses and fees
   (0.2 )% (24 ) (0.1 )% (24 ) (0.1 )% —

Net investment income
   5.1 % $ 881    4.8 % $ 823    0.3 % $ 58


	Six months ended June 30,												Increase (decrease)						Three months ended March 31,												Increase (decrease)
	2011						2010						2011 vs. 2010						2012						2011						2012 vs. 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount			Yield			Amount
Fixed maturity securities—taxable		5.1	%	$	1,363			5.0	%	$	1,272			0.1	%	$	91			4.9	%	$	660			5.0	%	$	670			(0.1	)%	$	(10	)
Fixed maturity securities—non-taxable		4.1	%		21			4.3	%		32			(0.2	)%		(11	)		3.4	%		4			4.2	%		11			(0.8	)%		(7	)
Commercial mortgage loans		5.6	%		184			5.7	%		203			(0.1	)%		(19	)		5.5	%		84			5.5	%		92			—	%		(8	)
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		7.7	%		19			7.4	%		20			0.3	%		(1	)		9.0	%		9			7.6	%		10			1.4	%		(1	)
Equity securities		7.6	%		13			9.4	%		7			(1.8	)%		6			4.1	%		4			3.2	%		3			0.9	%		1
Other invested assets		13.5	%		89			6.8	%		37			6.7	%		52			14.7	%		53			10.1	%		34			4.6	%		19
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		0.2	%		—			0.6	%		1			(0.4	)%		(1	)		—	%		—			0.3	%		—			(0.3	)%		—
Policy loans		7.9	%		59			7.6	%		55			0.3	%		4			8.0	%		31			8.0	%		29			—	%		2
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments		0.7	%		12			0.3	%		9			0.4	%		3			0.8	%		10			0.7	%		6			0.1	%		4

Gross investment income before expenses and fees		5.1	%		1,760			4.8	%		1,636			0.3	%		124			4.9	%		855			5.0	%		855			(0.1	)%		—
Expenses and fees		(0.1	)%		(49	)		(0.2	)%		(48	)		0.1	%		(1	)		(0.1	)%		(23	)		(0.2	)%		(25	)		0.1	%		2

Net investment income		5.0	%	$	1,711			4.6	%	$	1,588			0.4	%	$	123			4.8	%	$	832			4.8	%	$	830			—	%	$	2

Yields for fixed maturity and equity securities are based on weighted-average amortized cost or cost, respectively. Yields for other invested assets, which include securities lending activity, are calculated net of the corresponding securities lending liability. All other yields are based on average carrying values.

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011, the increase in overall~~March 31, 2012, weighted-average investment yields ~~was primarily attributable to the~~remained unchanged as higher average invested assets in longer duration products and improved ~~performance of~~yields on limited partnerships ~~accounted for under the equity method and $16 million of bond calls and prepayments in the current year.~~were offset by lower reinvestment yields. Net investment income for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 included $7$6 million of higher gains related to limited partnerships as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the increase in overall weighted-average investment yields was primarily attributable to the improved performance of limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method and $20 million of higher bond calls and prepayments in the current year. Net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included $21 million of gains related to limited partnerships as compared to $24 million of losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.

The following table sets forth net investment gains (losses) for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011
Available-for-sale securities:
Realized gains	$	25		$	53		$	54		$	76		$	63		$	29
Realized losses		(34	)		(36	)		(65	)		(74	)		(46	)		(31	)

Net realized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities		(9	)		17			(11	)		2			17			(2	)

Impairments:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(28	)		(24	)		(59	)		(101	)		(16	)		(31	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)		2			(27	)		(3	)		(30	)		(1	)		(5	)

Net other-than-temporary impairments		(26	)		(51	)		(62	)		(131	)		(17	)		(36	)

Trading securities		14			(4	)		25			2			(25	)		11
Commercial mortgage loans		2			(18	)		1			(22	)		2			(1	)
Net gains (losses) related to securitization entities		(5	)		(47	)		5			(36	)		34			10
Derivative instruments		(15	)		(38	)		(25	)		(46	)		26			(10	)
Other		(1	)		2			(1	)		22
Contingent purchase price valuation change														(2	)		—

Net investment gains (losses)	$	(40	)	$	(139	)	$	(68	)	$	(209	)	$	35		$	(28	)

Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011

We recorded ~~$26~~$17 million of net other-than-temporary impairments for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 as compared to ~~$51~~$36 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. Of total impairments for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010, $17~~$15 million and ~~$43~~$21 million, respectively, related to structured securities, including $9$8 million and $23 million, respectively, related to sub-prime and Alt-A residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded $4 million and $5 million, respectively, of impairments related to commercial mortgage loans and $2 million and $4 million, respectively, of impairments related to limited partnership investments. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we also recorded $3 million of impairments related to real estate held-for-investment.

~~Net investment losses related to derivatives of~~ $15 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were primarily due to $16 million of losses from the change in value of the embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the change in value of the derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs and $4 million of losses associated with derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk. These losses were partially offset by $3 million of gains related to a derivative strategy to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position and $2 million of gains in other non-qualified interest rate swaps. Net investment losses related to derivatives of $38 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were primarily related to $31 million of losses from the change in value of our credit default swaps due to widening credit spreads, $21 million of losses from the change in value of the embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the change in value of the derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs and $9 million of losses related to a derivative strategy to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position. These losses were partially offset by $15 million of ineffectiveness gains from our cash flow hedge programs related to our long-term care insurance business, $4 million of gains from other non-qualified interest rate swaps, $2 million of gains related to embedded derivatives associated with certain reinsurance agreements and $2 million of gains from foreign currency options and forward contracts.

Net losses related to the sale of available-for-sale securities were $9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net gains of $17 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010. We recorded $14 million of net gains related to trading securities during the three months ended June 30, 2011. We recorded $42 million of lower net losses related to securitization entities during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 primarily associated with lower losses related to derivatives. We also recorded $2 million of gains related to commercial mortgage loans during the three months ended June 30, 2011 attributable to a decrease in the allowance compared to $18 million of losses during the three months ended June 30, 2010 from a lower of cost or market adjustment on loans held-for-sale and an increase in the allowance.

The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $294 million from the sale of 78 securities and $858 million from the sale of 159 securities, respectively, which was approximately 91% and 96% of book value for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The loss on sales of securities in the three months ended June, 2011 was primarily driven by widening credit spreads. Generally, securities that are sold at a loss represent either small dollar amounts or percentage losses upon disposition. The securities sold at a loss in the second quarter of 2011 included one foreign corporate security that was sold for a total loss of $11 million related to portfolio repositioning activities. The securities sold at a loss in the second quarter of 2010 included one mortgage-backed security that was sold for a total loss of $4 million related to portfolio repositioning activities.

~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010~~

We recorded $62 million of net other-than-temporary impairments for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $131 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Of total impairments for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, $38 million and $105 million, respectively, related to structured securities, including $24 million and $59 million, respectively, related to sub-prime and Alt-A residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Impairments related to corporate securities as a result of bankruptcies, receivership or concerns about the issuer’s ability to continue to make contractual payments or where we have intent to sell were $14 million ~~and $5 million~~ for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.~~March 31, 2011. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011 and 2010,~~March 31, 2012, we also recorded $5$2 million of impairments related to commercial mortgage loans and $2 million and $10 million, respectively, of impairments related to limited partnership investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we also recorded $3 million of impairments related to real estate held-for-investment. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we also recorded $6 million of impairments related to financial hybrid securities.loans.

Net investment ~~losses~~gains related to derivatives of ~~$25~~$26 million ~~for~~during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 were primarily associated with credit default swaps and embedded derivatives related to variable annuity products with GMWB riders. The GMWB gains were primarily due to ~~$20 million of losses~~the policyholder funds outperforming the benchmark indices used for hedging. Additionally, there were gains from the ~~change in value~~narrowing of ~~derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the gains in value of the embedded derivative liabilities~~credit spreads associated with ~~our variable annuity products with GMWBs~~credit default swaps where we sold protection to improve diversification and ~~$13 million of~~portfolio yield. These gains were partially offset by losses associated with derivatives used to hedge foreign currency risk associated with near-term expected dividend payments and other cash flows from certain subsidiaries and to mitigate foreign subsidiary macroeconomic risk. ~~These~~In addition, there were losses attributable to increases in long-term interest rates that that were ~~partially offset by $5 million of gains~~ related to a non-qualified derivative strategy to mitigate ~~the~~ interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position and $3 million of gains in other non-qualified interest rate swaps. Net investment losses related to derivatives of $46 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were primarily related to $35 million of losses from the change in value of the embedded derivative liabilities exceeding the change in value of the derivative instruments used for mitigating the risk of embedded derivative liabilities associated with our variable annuity products with GMWBs, $27 million of losses from the change in value of our credit default swaps due to widening credit spreads and $6 million of losses related to a derivative strategy to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position. These losses were partially offset by $13 million ofas well as hedge ineffectiveness ~~gains~~ from our cash flow hedge programs related to our long-term care insurance ~~business, $7~~business. Net investment losses related to derivatives of $10 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were primarily related to losses associated with derivative instruments used to hedge foreign currency risk and GMWB losses primarily attributed to underperformance of the underlying variable annuity funds as compared to market indices and market losses resulting from increased volatility. These losses were partially offset by gains from ~~other non-qualified interest rate~~credit default swaps due to narrowing credit spreads and ~~$2 million of~~ gains related to ~~embedded derivatives~~a derivative strategy to mitigate interest rate risk associated with ~~certain reinsurance agreements.~~our statutory capital position.

Net ~~losses~~gains related to the sale of available-for-sale securities were ~~$11~~$17 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 compared to net ~~gains~~losses of $2 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. We recorded ~~$23~~net losses of $25 million ~~of higher gains~~ related to trading securities during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 compared to net gains of $11 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. We recorded $5$24 million of higher net gains related to securitization entities during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011 primarily related to gains on trading securities~~March 31, 2012 compared to ~~$36 million of net losses during~~ the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 primarily associated with derivatives. WeDuring the three months ended March 31, 2012, we also recorded $1a $2 million ~~of gains~~purchase price valuation adjustment related to ~~commercial mortgage loans during~~ the ~~six months ended June 30, 2011 attributable to a decrease in the allowance compared to $22 million~~purchase of losses during the six months ended June 30, 2010 from a lower of cost or market adjustment on loans held-for-sale and an increase in the allowance. There was also a net gain of $16 million from the recovery of a counterparty receivableAltegris in 2010.

The aggregate fair value of securities sold at a loss during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ was ~~$691~~$357 million from the sale of ~~145~~103 securities and ~~$1,416~~$397 million from the sale of ~~239~~74 securities, respectively, which was approximately ~~93%~~90% and ~~95%~~94%, respectively, of book value. The loss on sales of securities in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was primarily driven by widening credit spreads. Generally, securities that are sold at a loss represent either small dollar amounts or percentage losses upon disposition. The securities sold at a loss ~~during~~in the ~~six months ended June 30,~~first quarter of 2012 included one corporate security sold for a total loss of $8 million and one municipal bond sold for a total loss of $4 million related to portfolio repositioning activities. The securities sold at a loss in the first quarter of 2011 included two U.S. corporate securities that were sold for a total loss of $11 million in the first quarter of 2011 and one foreign corporate security that was sold for a total loss of $11 million in the second quarter of 2011 related to portfolio repositioning activities. The securities sold at a loss during the six months ended June 30, 2010 included one non-U.S. government security that was sold for a total loss of $7 million in the first quarter of 2010 and one mortgage-backed security that was sold for a total loss of $4 million in the second quarter of 2010 related to portfolio repositioning activities.

Investment portfolio

We analyze our investment portfolio on a security by security basis as part of our ongoing evaluation of our holdings. A component of this ongoing evaluation is an internal credit monitoring process that includes a fundamental evaluation of the credit risk for each security. In this evaluation, we consider published ratings, when available. However, our analysis is not intended to validate nor make any judgments with respect to the validity of any third-party credit ratings but, rather, is intended to serve as the basis for making decisions with respect to our ongoing management of our investment portfolio. Additionally, in any financial reporting disclosure where ratings are presented or stratified, such as investment grade and below investment grade, we utilize the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) rating, when available, and do not make any adjustments to third-party ratings in such disclosures.

In our evaluation of our securities, we consider current market spreads and ratings published by a NRSRO in our analysis. For corporate securities, we consider factors such as the financial results and ratios of a company, capital structure, industry, covenants and other available information including updates from rating agencies. For structured securities, we also consider underlying asset performance including default, delinquency, loan-to-value of the collateral, third-party enhancement and current levels of subordination. Although we consider NRSRO ratings, they are not considered a significant component of our analysis of fair value or other-than-temporary impairments.

The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and invested assets as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale:
Public	$	43,525		61	%	$	42,526		59	%	$	45,113		60	%	$	45,420		59	%
Private		12,696		18			12,657		18			13,419		18			12,875		17
Commercial mortgage loans		6,432		9			6,718		9			6,030		8			6,092		8
Other invested assets		3,301		5			3,854		5			3,001		4			4,819		6
Policy loans		1,542		2			1,471		2			1,555		2			1,549		2
Equity securities, available-for-sale												434		1			361		—
Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities		457		1			507		1			392		1			411		1
Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		379		—			372		1			384		—			377		1
Equity securities, available-for-sale		374		—			332		1
Cash and cash equivalents		2,831		4			3,132		4			4,187		6			4,488		6

Total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets	$	71,537		100	%	$	71,569		100	%	$	74,515		100	%	$	76,392		100	%

For a discussion of the change in cash, cash equivalents and invested assets, see the comparison for this line item under “—Consolidated Balance Sheets.” See note 4 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information related to our investment portfolio.

We hold fixed maturity, equity and trading securities, derivatives, embedded derivatives, securities held as collateral and certain other financial instruments, which are carried at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately 4%8% of our investment holdings recorded at fair value was based on significant inputs that were not market observable and were classified as Level 3 measurements. See note 6 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information related to fair value.

Fixed maturity and equity securities

As of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2012, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:


			Gross unrealized gains				Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Not other-than- temporarily impaired		Other-than- temporarily impaired		Not other-than- temporarily impaired			Other-than- temporarily impaired			Fair value
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3,893	$	687	$	—	$	(6	)	$	—		$	4,574
Tax-exempt⁽¹⁾		379		13		—		(51	)		—			341
Government—non-U.S.⁽²⁾		2,103		189		—		(1	)		—			2,291
U.S. corporate^{(2), (3)}		23,121		2,283		17		(213	)		(1	)		25,207
Corporate—non-U.S.⁽²⁾		13,760		807		—		(125	)		—			14,442
Residential mortgage-backed⁽⁴⁾		5,807		436		9		(235	)		(165	)		5,852
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,407		137		5		(161	)		(42	)		3,346
Other asset-backed⁽⁴⁾		2,544		25		—		(88	)		(2	)		2,479

Total fixed maturity securities		55,014		4,577		31		(880	)		(210	)		58,532
Equity securities		419		22		—		(7	)		—			434

Total available-for-sale securities	$	55,433	$	4,599	$	31	$	(887	)	$	(210	)	$	58,966

⁽¹⁾	Fair value included municipal bonds of $237 million related to special revenue bonds, $87 million related to general obligation bonds and $17 million related to other municipal bonds.

⁽²⁾	Fair value included $647 million of European periphery exposure.

⁽³⁾	Fair value included municipal bonds of $835 million related to special revenue bonds and $390 million related to general obligation bonds.

⁽⁴⁾	Fair value included $361 million collateralized by sub-prime residential mortgage loans and $265 million collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans.

As of December 31, 2011, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:


(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost			Gross unrealized gains								Gross unrealized losses								Fair value
(Amounts in millions)																				Fair value					Gross unrealized gains								Gross unrealized losses
(Amounts in millions)	Amortized cost or cost		Amortized cost or cost				Not other-than- temporarily impaired				Other-than- temporarily impaired				Not other-than- temporarily impaired				Other-than- temporarily impaired				Fair value				Amortized cost or cost				Not other- than- temporarily impaired				Other- than- temporarily impaired				Not other- than- temporarily impaired				Other- than- temporarily impaired				Fair value
(Amounts in millions)																							Fair value
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	3,548	Amortized cost or cost		$	153			$	—			$	(19	)		$	—			$	3,682			$	3,946			$	918			$	—			$	(1	)		$	—			$	4,863
Tax-exempt⁽¹⁾		940			19				—				(94	)			—				865				564				15				—				(76	)			—				503
Government—non-U.S.(2)		2,265			128				—				(4	)			—				2,389				2,017				196				—				(2	)			—				2,211
U.S. corporate⁽²⁾		23,081			1,260				13				(307	)			—				24,047
U.S. corporate^{(2), (3)}																									23,024				2,542				18				(325	)			(1	)			25,258
Corporate—non-U.S.(2)		14,038			530				—				(139	)			(1	)			14,428				13,156				819				—				(218	)			—				13,757
Residential mortgage-backed⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		5,252			174				15				(268	)			(190	)			4,983				5,695				446				9				(252	)			(203	)			5,695
Commercial mortgage-backed		3,767			135				6				(153	)			(34	)			3,721				3,470				157				4				(179	)			(52	)			3,400
Other asset-backed⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		2,172			22				—				(86	)			(2	)			2,106				2,686				18				—				(95	)			(1	)			2,608

Total fixed maturity securities		55,063			2,421				34				(1,070	)			(227	)			56,221				54,558				5,111				31				(1,148	)			(257	)			58,295
Equity securities		352			25				—				(3	)			—				374				356				19				—				(14	)			—				361

Total available-for-sale securities	$	55,415		$	2,446			$	34			$	(1,073	)		$	(227	)		$	56,595			$	54,914			$	5,130			$	31			$	(1,162	)		$	(257	)		$	58,656

⁽¹⁾	Fair value included municipal bonds of ~~$545~~$296 million related to special revenue bonds, ~~$282~~$185 million related to general obligation bonds and ~~$38~~$22 million related to other municipal bonds.

⁽²⁾	Fair value included ~~municipal bonds~~$689 million of ~~$522 million related to special revenue bonds and $356 million related to general obligation bonds.~~European periphery exposure.

⁽³⁾	Fair value included ~~$414 million collateralized by sub-prime residential mortgage loans and $331 million collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans.~~

~~As of December 31, 2010, the amortized cost or cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value of our fixed maturity and equity securities classified as available-for-sale were as follows:~~

(Amounts in millions)
Amortized
cost or
cost Gross unrealized gains Gross unrealized losses Fair
value
Not other-than-
temporarily
impaired Other-than-
temporarily
impaired Not other-than-
temporarily
impaired Other-than-
temporarily
impaired
Fixed maturity securities:

U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises
$ 3,568    $ 145    $ —      $ (8 ) $ —      $ 3,705
Tax-exempt⁽¹⁾
1,124    19    —      (113 ) —      1,030
Government—non-U.S.
2,257    118    —      (6 ) —      2,369
U.S. corporate⁽²⁾
23,282    1,123    10    (448 ) —      23,967
Corporate—non-U.S.
13,180    485    —      (167 ) —      13,498
Residential mortgage-backed⁽³⁾
4,821    116    18    (304 ) (196 ) 4,455
Commercial mortgage-backed
3,936    132    6    (286 ) (45 ) 3,743
Other asset-backed⁽³⁾
2,494    18    —      (94 ) (2 ) 2,416

Total fixed maturity securities
54,662    2,156    34    (1,426 ) (243 ) 55,183
Equity securities
323    13    —      (4 ) —      332

Total available-for-sale securities
$ 54,985    $ 2,169    $ 34    $ (1,430 ) $ (243 ) $ 55,515

⁽¹⁾	~~Fair value included~~ municipal bonds of ~~$666 million related to special revenue bonds, $309 million related to general obligation bonds and $55 million related to other municipal bonds.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Fair value included municipal bonds of $682~~$881 million related to special revenue bonds and ~~$394~~$416 million related to general obligation bonds.

⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾

Fair value included ~~$457~~$362 million collateralized by sub-prime residential mortgage loans and ~~$376~~$261 million collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans.

Fixed maturity securities increased ~~$1.0 billion~~$237 million primarily ~~due to the decline in interest rates~~as a result of purchases exceeding maturities and ~~the decline~~sales and a decrease in the value of the U.S. ~~dollar.~~dollar, partially offset by an increase in interest rates in the current year.

The majority of our unrealized losses were related to securities held within our ~~Retirement and Protection~~U.S. Life Insurance segment. Our U.S. Mortgage Insurance segment had gross unrealized losses of ~~$98~~$52 million and ~~$128~~$81 million as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively.

Our exposure in peripheral European countries consist of fixed maturity securities and trading bonds in Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy and Spain. Investments in these countries are primarily made to support our international businesses and to diversify our U.S. corporate fixed maturity securities with European bonds denominated in U.S. dollars. The following table sets forth the fair value of our exposure to these peripheral European countries as of the periods indicated:


	March 31, 2012
(Amounts in millions)	Sovereign Debt		Non-Financial		Financial—Hybrids		Financial—Non-Hybrids		Total
Spain	$	14	$	130	$	28	$	94	$	266
Ireland		3		170		—		24		197
Italy		3		166		—		1		170
Portugal		—		23		—		—		23
Greece		—		1		—		—		1

Total	$	20	$	490	$	28	$	119	$	657


	December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Sovereign Debt		Non-Financial		Financial—Hybrids		Financial—Non-Hybrids		Total
Spain	$	13	$	147	$	24	$	89	$	273
Ireland		3		194		—		23		220
Italy		2		165		—		11		178
Portugal		—		25		—		—		25
Greece		—		1		—		2		3

Total	$	18	$	532	$	24	$	125	$	699

During the first quarter of 2012, financial markets showed signs of improvement from the volatility that characterized the market in the fourth quarter of 2011 due to increased uncertainty regarding both the U.S. and European economies and concerns over the spread of economic and financial system risk from peripheral European countries to the larger European countries and the impact on the European banking sector of a possible default on Greek debt. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we reduced our exposure to the peripheral European countries by $42 million to $657 million with unrealized losses of $28 million. Our exposure as of March 31, 2012 was diversified with direct exposure to local economies of $271 million, indirect exposure through debt issued by subsidiaries outside of the European periphery of $142 million and exposure to multinational companies where the majority of revenues come from outside of the country of domicile of $244 million.

Commercial mortgage loans

The following tables set forth additional information regarding our commercial mortgage loans as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011											March 31, 2012
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Total recorded investment		Number of loans		Loan- to-value ⁽¹⁾			Delinquent principal balance		Number of delinquent loans		Total recorded investment		Number of loans		Loan-to-value ⁽¹⁾			Delinquent principal balance		Number of delinquent loans
Loan Year
2004 and prior	$	1,988		846		49	%	$	30		5	$	1,712		753		48	%	$	1		1
2005		1,415		309		64	%		3		1		1,346		301		63	%		15		4
2006		1,293		278		73	%		4		1		1,198		268		70	%		—		—
2007		1,275		188		77	%		—		—		1,081		178		75	%		1		1
2008		272		57		73	%		2		1		265		56		74	%		4		1
2009		—		—		—	%		—		—		—		—		—	%		—		—
2010		103		17		63	%		—		—		100		17		62	%		4		2
2011		139		27		65	%		—		—		293		55		65	%		—		—
2012													81		15		61	%		—		—

Total	$	6,485		1,722		64	%	$	39		8	$	6,076		1,643		63	%	$	25		9

⁽¹⁾	Represents weighted-average loan-to-value as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.


	December 31, 2010											December 31, 2011
(Dollar amounts in millions)	Total recorded investment⁽¹⁾		Number of loans		Loan- to-value ⁽²⁾			Delinquent principal balance		Number of delinquent loans		Total recorded investment		Number of loans		Loan-to-value ⁽¹⁾			Delinquent principal balance		Number of delinquent loans
Loan Year
2004 and prior	$	2,167		908		51	%	$	21		6	$	1,805		792		49	%	$	19		2
2005		1,457		312		65	%		—		—		1,366		302		63	%		3		1
2006		1,417		283		73	%		9		1		1,208		268		71	%		—		—
2007		1,347		193		79	%		9		2		1,099		180		75	%		—		—
2008		280		58		77	%		11		2		267		56		75	%		—		—
2009		—		—		—	%		—		—		—		—		—	%		—		—
2010		104		17		58	%		—		—		101		17		63	%		—		—
2011													294		55		65	%		—		—

Total	$	6,772		1,771		65	%	$	50		11	$	6,140		1,670		63	%	$	22		3

⁽¹⁾	~~Re-presented to include $4 million of net premium/discount on our commercial mortgage loans.~~

⁽²⁾	Represents weighted-average loan-to-value as of December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

The following table sets forth the allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in commercial mortgage loans as of or for the periods indicated:


							Three months ended March 31,
(Amounts in millions)	Three months ended June 30, 2011			Six months ended June 30, 2011			2012			2011
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	58		$	59		$	51		$	59
Charge-offs		(4	)		(5	)		(1	)		(1	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—
Provision		3			3			(1	)		—

Ending balance	$	57		$	57		$	49		$	58

Ending allowance for individually impaired loans	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

Ending allowance for loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment	$	57		$	57		$	49		$	58

Recorded investment:
Ending balance	$	6,485		$	6,485		$	6,076		$	6,654

Ending balance of individually impaired loans	$	13		$	13		$	2		$	14

Ending balance of loans not individually impaired that were evaluated collectively for impairment	$	6,472		$	6,472		$	6,074		$	6,640

The charge-offs during ~~2011~~2012 were related to individually impaired commercial mortgage loans.

~~The following table presents the activity in the allowance for losses during the periods indicated:~~

(Amounts in millions)
   As of or for the
three months ended
June 30, 2010    As of or for the
six months ended
June 30, 2010
Beginning balance
   $ 52       $ 48
Provision⁽¹⁾
   18       22
Release
   —         —




Ending balance
   $ 70       $ 70

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes $13 million related to held-for-sale commercial mortgage loans.~~

Restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization entities

~~The following tables set forth~~See note 4 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information ~~regarding our~~related to restricted commercial mortgage loans related to securitization ~~entities as of the dates indicated:~~entities.

   June 30, 2011
(Dollar amounts in millions)
   Total recorded
investment    Number of
loans    Loan-
to-value ⁽¹⁾ Delinquent
principal balance    Number of
delinquent
loans
Loan Year

2004 and prior
   $ 459       192       40 % $ 3       2








Total
   $ 459       192       40 % $ 3       2

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents weighted-average loan-to-value as of June 30, 2011.~~

   December 31, 2010
(Dollar amounts in millions)
   Total recorded
investment    Number of
loans    Loan-
to-value ⁽¹⁾ Delinquent
principal balance    Number of
delinquent
loans
Loan Year

2004 and prior
   $ 509       202       43 % $ —         —








Total
   $ 509       202       43 % $ —         —

⁽¹⁾	~~Represents weighted-average loan-to-value as of December 31, 2010.~~

Other invested assets

The following table sets forth the carrying values of our other invested assets as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(Amounts in millions)	Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total			Carrying value		% of total
Derivatives	$	820		25	%	$	1,047		27	%	$	859		29	%	$	1,485		31	%
Trading securities												770		26			788		16
Derivatives counterparty collateral		705		21			794		21			589		19			1,023		21
Trading securities		607		18			677		18
Securities lending collateral		554		17			772		20
Limited partnerships		346		11			340		9			352		12			344		7
Short-term investments		155		5			139		3			217		7			657		14
Securities lending collateral												93		3			406		9
Other investments		114		3			85		2			121		4			116		2

Total other invested assets	$	3,301		100	%	$	3,854		100	%	$	3,001		100	%	$	4,819		100	%

Our investments in derivatives and derivative counterparty collateral decreased primarily attributable to the long-term interest rate environment. Short-term investments decreased as ~~a result the maturity of the swap arrangements associated with the maturity of ¥57.0 billion of senior notes in June 2011.~~maturities were reinvested longer term. Securities lending collateral decreased primarily due to ~~no longer recording the non-cash collateral asset related to~~a decrease in demand for the securities lending program in ~~Canada during~~ the ~~second quarter of 2011 as a result of not having any rights to sell or re-pledge the collateral assets. The decrease in trading securities was attributable to sales and maturities exceeding purchases.~~United States.

Derivatives


(Notional in millions)	Measurement	December 31, 2010		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			June 30, 2011		Measurement		December 31, 2011		Additions		Maturities/ terminations			March 31, 2012
Derivatives designated as hedges
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Notional	$	12,355	$	995	$	(157	)	$	13,193		Notional	$	12,399	$	—	$	(3	)	$	12,396
Forward bond purchase commitments												Notional		504		—		—			504
Inflation indexed swaps	Notional		525		16		—			541		Notional		544		5		—			549
Foreign currency swaps	Notional		491		—		(491	)		—		Notional		—		87		—			87

Total cash flow hedges			13,371		1,011		(648	)		13,734				13,447		92		(3	)		13,536

Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Notional		1,764		—		(405	)		1,359		Notional		1,039		—		(22	)		1,017
Foreign currency swaps	Notional		85		—		—			85		Notional		85		—		—			85

Total fair value hedges			1,849		—		(405	)		1,444				1,124		—		(22	)		1,102

Total derivatives designated as hedges			15,220		1,011		(1,053	)		15,178				14,571		92		(25	)		14,638

Derivatives not designated as hedges
Interest rate swaps	Notional		7,681		314		(1,550	)		6,445		Notional		7,200		680		(531	)		7,349
Equity return swaps	Notional		208		139		—			347
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities	Notional		129		—		(6	)		123		Notional		117		—		(3	)		114
Interest rate swaptions	Notional		200		—		(200	)		—
Credit default swaps	Notional		1,195		115		(100	)		1,210		Notional		1,110		—		(30	)		1,080
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities	Notional		317		—		—			317		Notional		314		—		—			314
Equity index options	Notional		744		521		(480	)		785		Notional		522		300		(94	)		728
Financial futures	Notional		3,937		2,687		(3,463	)		3,161		Notional		2,924		1,156		(1,935	)		2,145
Equity return swaps												Notional		326		14		(68	)		272
Other foreign currency contracts	Notional		521		185		(535	)		171		Notional		779		358		(14	)		1,123
Reinsurance embedded derivatives	Notional		72		89		—			161		Notional		228		24		—			252

Total derivatives not designated as hedges			15,004		4,050		(6,334	)		12,720				13,520		2,532		(2,675	)		13,377

Total derivatives		$	30,224	$	5,061	$	(7,387	)	$	27,898			$	28,091	$	2,624	$	(2,700	)	$	28,015


(Number of policies)	Measurement	December 31, 2010		Additions		Terminations			June 30, 2011
Derivatives not designated as hedges
GMWB embedded derivatives	Policies		49,566		690		(1,326	)		48,930

(Number of policies)

Measurement

December 31,
2011

Additions

Maturities/
terminations

March 31,
2012

Derivatives not designated as hedges

GMWB embedded derivatives

Policies

47,716

(633

)

47,084

The decrease in the notional value of derivatives was primarily attributable to a ~~$1.1~~$0.3 billion notional decrease in interest rate swaps, ~~and swaptions~~a $0.1 billion decrease related to ~~a derivative strategy to mitigate interest rate risk associated with our statutory capital position, a $1.0 billion notional decrease in interest rate swaps and financial futures~~derivatives used to hedge ~~liabilities related to~~ our ~~institutional~~variable annuity products with GMWBs and a ~~$1.0~~decrease of $0.1 billion ~~notional decrease from maturing cross currency~~in non-qualifying interest rate swaps ~~and options related to the maturity of ¥57.0 billion of senior notes in June 2011. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.8 billion notional increase in cash flow hedges~~ related to our interest rate hedging strategy associated with our long-term care insurance products. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.3 billion notional increase in derivatives used to hedge foreign currency and equity market risk and $0.1 billion of cross currency swaps added during 2012.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Total assets. Total assets decreased ~~$0.1~~$1.2 billion from ~~$112.4~~$112.2 billion as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 to ~~$112.3~~$111.0 billion as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

Cash, cash equivalents and invested assets decreased ~~$32 million~~$1.9 billion primarily from a decrease of ~~$301 million~~$1.6 billion in invested assets and a decrease of $0.3 billion in cash and cash ~~equivalents, partially offset~~equivalents. Other invested assets decreased $1.8 billion primarily driven by ~~an increase of $269 million in invested assets. The~~a decrease in ~~cash was primarily~~derivatives and derivatives counterparty collateral largely attributable to the ~~repayment of debt~~long-term interest rate environment, a decrease in ~~June 2011.~~short-term investments as maturities were reinvested longer term and a decrease in demand for the securities lending program in the United States. Our fixed maturity securities portfolio increased ~~$1,038 million resulting~~$0.2 billion primarily ~~from the decline in interest rates~~as a result of purchases exceeding maturities and ~~the decline~~sales and a decrease in the value of the U.S. ~~dollar. Commercial mortgage loans decreased $286 million as collections exceeded originations during 2011. Other invested assets decreased $553 million primarily driven~~dollar, partially offset by ~~no longer recording~~an increase in interest rates in the non-cash collateral asset related to the securities lending program in Canada during the second quarter of 2011 as a result of not having any rights to sell or re-pledge the collateral assets and a decrease in derivatives, derivatives counterparty collateral and trading securities.current year.

Separate account assets ~~decreased $214 million~~increased $0.5 billion primarily as a result of ~~the discontinuance of new sales of variable annuities.~~favorable market performance.

Total liabilities. Total liabilities decreased ~~$0.6~~$0.9 billion from ~~$97.4~~$96.0 billion as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 to ~~$96.8~~$95.1 billion as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

Our policyholder-related liabilities increased ~~$13 million.~~$0.1 billion. Our long-term care insurance business increased from growth of the in-force block and higher claims. Our ~~U.S.~~life insurance business increased from growth of our term universal and universal life insurance products. Our international mortgage insurance business increased from a reserve strengthening in the current year in Australia which was partially offset by higher paid claims. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in our ~~spread-based~~annuity products from benefit payments and scheduled maturities of our ~~spread-based~~annuity and institutional products. Our U.S. mortgage insurance business also decreased due to lower new delinquencies.

Other liabilities decreased ~~$448 million~~$1.0 billion primarily asrelated to a ~~result of no longer recording the offsetting liability~~decrease in derivatives counterparty collateral largely attributable to the ~~non-cash collateral asset related to~~long-term interest rate environment and from decreased demand for the securities lending program in ~~Canada during~~ the ~~second quarter of 2011 as a result of not having any rights to sell or re-pledge the collateral assets~~United States and ~~a decrease in~~ our repurchase program.

Long-term borrowings ~~decreased $197 million~~increased $0.4 billion principally from the maturity of our ¥57.0 billion of senior notes in June 2011 and the redemption of the remaining outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock for $57 million in June 2011. These decreases were partially offset by the issuance of ~~$400~~$350 million of senior notes in March ~~2011~~2012.

Non-recourse funding obligations decreased $0.7 billion mainly from the repayment of the non-recourse funding obligations issued by River Lake Insurance Company III (“River Lake III”) as part of the life block sale transaction in the current year and ~~the issuance of AUD$140 million of subordinated floating rate notes by our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited, in June 2011.~~also from other repurchases during 2012.

Separate account liabilities ~~decreased $214 million~~increased $0.5 billion primarily as a result of ~~the discontinuance of new sales of variable annuities.~~favorable market performance.

Total stockholders’ equity. Total stockholders’ equity ~~increased $0.5~~decreased $0.3 billion from ~~$15.0~~$16.2 billion as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 to ~~$15.5~~$15.9 billion as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

~~We reported a net loss available to Genworth Financial, Inc.’s common stockholders of $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.~~

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ~~increased $570 million~~decreased $0.4 billion predominately attributable to ~~higher~~lower net unrealized investment gains of $0.2 billion and a decrease of $0.3 billion related to derivatives qualifying as hedges, net of tax, largely attributable to the long-term interest rate environment. These decreases were partially offset by the weakening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies resulting in higher foreign currency translation adjustments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity and capital resources represent our overall financial strength and our ability to generate cash flows from our businesses, borrow funds at competitive rates and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.

Genworth Financial and subsidiaries

The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated cash flows for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30:~~March 31:


(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010			2012			2011
Net cash from operating activities	$	842		$	557		$	(252	)	$	336
Net cash from investing activities		(6	)		(723	)		124			496
Net cash from financing activities		(1,169	)		(243	)		(189	)		(221	)

Net decrease in cash before foreign exchange effect	$	(333	)	$	(409	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash before foreign exchange effect							$	(317	)	$	611

Our principal sources of cash include sales of our products and services, income from our investment portfolio and proceeds from sales of investments. As an insurance business, we typically generate positive cash flows from operating activities, as premiums collected from our insurance products and income received from our investments exceed policy acquisition costs, benefits paid, redemptions and operating expenses. These positive cash flows are then invested to support the obligations of our insurance and investment products and required capital supporting these products. Our cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums, fees and investment income received and benefits and expenses paid. ~~The increase in~~We had cash ~~inflows~~outflows from operating activities induring the ~~first half of 2011~~three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to cash inflows during the ~~first half of 2010 was~~three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily as a result of ~~lower tax settlements in the first half of 2011 and an increase~~a decrease from policy-related balances associated with the timing of ~~payments.~~payments, a decrease from derivatives activity and higher tax settlements in the current year.

In analyzing our cash flow, we focus on the change in the amount of cash available and used in investing activities. We had lower ~~net~~ cash ~~outflows~~inflows from investing activities induring the ~~first half of~~three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 ~~primarily~~ from higher ~~maturities~~purchases of fixed maturity securities in the current year, partially offset by ~~purchases exceeding sales~~cash inflows from other invested assets in the current year compared to cash outflows in the prior year.

Changes in cash from financing activities primarily relate to the issuance of, and redemptions and benefit payments on, universal life insurance and investment contracts; the issuance and acquisition of debt and equity securities; the issuance and repayment or repurchase of borrowings and non-recourse funding obligations; and dividends to our stockholders and other capital transactions. We had ~~higher~~lower net cash outflows from financing activities induring the ~~first half of 2011~~three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily related to ~~debt repayments and~~lower redemptions of our investment contracts ~~primarily from scheduled maturities~~in the current year, partially offset by the repurchase and ~~surrenders which exceeded deposits received on these contracts.~~redemption of non-recourse funding obligations in the current year.

In the United States and Canada, we engage in certain securities lending transactions for the purpose of enhancing the yield on our investment securities portfolio. We maintain effective control over all loaned securities and, therefore, continue to report such securities as fixed maturity securities on the consolidated balance sheets. We are currently indemnified against counterparty credit risk by the intermediary.

Under the securities lending program in the United States, the borrower is required to provide collateral, ~~consisting~~which can consist of cash ~~and~~or government securities, on a daily basis in amounts equal to or exceeding 102% of the applicable securities loaned. Currently, we only accept cash collateral from borrowers under the program. Cash ~~and non-cash~~ collateral ~~such as a security,~~ received by us on securities lending transactions is reflected in other invested assets with an offsetting liability recognized in other liabilities for the obligation to return the collateral. Any cash collateral received is reinvested by our custodian based upon the investment guidelines provided within our agreement. In

the United States, the reinvested cash collateral is primarily invested in a money market fund approved by the NAIC, U.S. and foreign government securities, U.S. government agency securities, asset-backed securities and corporate debt securities. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the fair value of securities loaned under our securities lending program in the United States was ~~$0.5 billion.~~$0.1 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the fair value of collateral held under our securities lending program in the United States was ~~$0.5~~$0.1 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, and the offsetting obligation to return collateral of ~~$0.5~~$0.1 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, was included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. We ~~had no~~did not have any non-cash collateral provided by the borrower in our securities lending program in the United States as of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

Under our securities lending program in Canada, the borrower is required to provide collateral consisting of government securities on a daily basis in amounts equal to or exceeding 105% of the fair value of the applicable securities loaned. Securities received from counterparties as collateral are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet given that the risk and rewards of ownership is not transferred from the counterparties to us in the course of such transactions. Additionally, there was no cash collateral as cash collateral is not permitted as an acceptable form of collateral under the program. In Canada, the lending institution must be included on the approved Securities Lending Borrowers List with the Canadian regulator and the intermediary must be rated at least “AA-” by ~~S&P.~~Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the fair value of securities loaned under our securities lending program in Canada was $0.3 billion. Prior to the second quarter of 2011, we recorded non-cash collateral in other invested assets with a corresponding liability in other liabilities representing our obligation to return the non-cash collateral. Since we do not have rights to sell or pledge the non-cash collateral, we determined the gross presentation of these amounts were not required and changed our presentation of these amounts in the second quarter of 2011.

We also have a repurchase program in which we sell an investment security at a specified price and agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. Repurchase agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently reacquired, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreement. The market value of securities to be repurchased is monitored and collateral levels are adjusted where appropriate to protect the counterparty and us against credit exposure. Cash received is invested in fixed maturity securities. As of ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the fair value of securities pledged under the repurchase program was ~~$1.6~~$1.5 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, and the repurchase obligation of ~~$1.5~~$1.4 billion and ~~$1.7~~$1.5 billion, respectively, was included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Genworth Financial, Inc.—holding company

We conduct all our operations through our operating subsidiaries. Dividends from our subsidiaries and permitted payments to us under our tax sharing arrangements with our subsidiaries are our principal sources of cash to pay stockholder dividends and to meet our holding company obligations, including payments of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. OtherOur principal sources of cash include proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, including borrowings pursuant to our credit facilities, dividends from our subsidiaries, payments to us under our tax sharing arrangements with our subsidiaries and sales of assets. Insurance laws and regulations regulate the payment of dividends and other distributions to us by our insurance subsidiaries. We expect dividends paid to us by our insurance subsidiaries will vary depending on strategic objectives, regulatory requirements and business performance.

Our primary uses of funds at our holding company level include payment of general operating expenses, payment of principal, interest and other expenses related to holding company debt, payment of dividends on our common ~~and preferred~~ stock (to the extent declared by our Board of Directors), amounts we owe to GE under the Tax Matters Agreement, contributions to subsidiaries, repurchase of stock, and, potentially, acquisitions.

Our holding company had $657 million and $813 million of cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Our holding company also had $10 million and $200 million in highly liquid U.S. government bonds as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we received dividends from our subsidiaries of $39 million, of which $24 million came from our non-U.S. subsidiaries. In July 2011, we received $65 million of dividends from one of our non-U.S. subsidiaries in connection with proceeds from the Canadian share repurchase in the second quarter of 2011.

In November 2008, our Board of Directors decided to suspend the payment of dividends on our common stock indefinitely. The declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent on many factors including the receipt of dividends from our operating subsidiaries, our financial condition and operating results, the capital requirements of our subsidiaries, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, our credit and financial strength ratings and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

Our holding company had $1,272 million and $907 million of cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Our holding company also held $140 million and $40 million in highly liquid securities as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we received dividends from our subsidiaries of $10 million. On April 27, 2012, we received a dividend of $100 million ($38 million of which was deemed “extraordinary”) from one of our U.S. life insurance subsidiaries representing a portion of the proceeds from the sale of our Medicare supplement insurance business which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Regulated insurance subsidiaries

The liquidity requirements of our regulated insurance subsidiaries principally relate to the liabilities associated with their various insurance and investment products, operating costs and expenses, the payment of dividends to us, contributions to their subsidiaries, payment of principal and interest on their outstanding debt obligations and income taxes. Liabilities arising from insurance and investment products include the payment of benefits, as well as cash payments in connection with policy surrenders and withdrawals, policy loans and obligations to redeem funding agreements.

Our insurance subsidiaries have used cash flows from operations and investment activities to fund their liquidity requirements. Our insurance subsidiaries’ principal cash inflows from operating activities are derived from premiums, annuity deposits and insurance and investment product fees and other income, including commissions, cost of insurance, mortality, expense and surrender charges, contract underwriting fees, investment management fees and dividends and distributions from their subsidiaries. The principal cash inflows from investment activities result from repayments of principal, investment income and, as necessary, sales of invested assets.

Our insurance subsidiaries maintain investment strategies intended to provide adequate funds to pay benefits without forced sales of investments. Products having liabilities with longer durations, such as certain life insurance and long-term care insurance policies, are matched with investments having similar ~~estimated lives~~duration such as long-term fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgage loans. Shorter-term liabilities are matched with fixed maturity securities that have short- and medium-term fixed maturities. In addition, our insurance subsidiaries hold highly liquid, ~~high-quality~~high quality short-term investment securities and other liquid investment grade fixed maturity securities to fund anticipated operating expenses, surrenders and withdrawals. As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, our total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets were ~~$71.5~~$74.5 billion. Our investments in privately placed fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans, limited partnership interests and select mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are relatively illiquid. These asset classes represented approximately ~~31%~~30% of the carrying value of our total cash, cash equivalents and invested assets as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we had approximately ~~$291~~$135 million of GICs outstanding. Substantially all of these contracts allow for the payment of benefits at contract value to Employee Retirement Income Security Act ~~(“ERISA”)~~ plans prior to contract maturity in the event of death, disability, retirement or change in investment election. These contracts also provide for early termination by the contractholder but are subject to an adjustment to the contract value for changes in the level of interest rates from the time the GIC was issued plus an early withdrawal penalty. We carefully underwrite these risks before issuing a GIC to a plan and historically have been able to effectively manage our exposure to these benefit payments. Our GICs typically credit interest at a fixed interest rate and have a fixed maturity generally ranging from two to six years.

We are executing a non-cash intercompany transaction to increase the statutory capital in our U.S. mortgage insurance companies by using a portion of common shares of Genworth Canada, with an estimated market value of $375 million, currently held by Brookfield, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary. Once this transaction is complete, we will continue to hold approximately 57.5% of the outstanding common shares of Genworth Canada on a consolidated basis. In addition, Brookfield will have the right, exercisable at its discretion, to purchase for cash these common shares of Genworth Canada from our U.S. mortgage insurance companies at the then current market price. Brookfield will also have a right of first refusal with respect to the transfer of these common shares of Genworth Canada by the U.S. mortgage insurance companies. This transaction is undergoing customary regulatory review and is expected to be effective as of June 30, 2011, for statutory financial reporting purposes.

Capital resources and financing activities

We have two five-year revolving credit facilities that mature in May 2012 and August 2012. These facilities bear variable interest rates based on one-month London Interbank Offered Rate ~~(“LIBOR”)~~ plus a margin and we have access to $1.9 billion under these facilities. As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we had no borrowings under these

facilities; however, we utilized ~~$279~~$254 million under these facilities primarily for the issuance of letters of credit for the benefit of one of our life insurance subsidiaries. As of December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had no borrowings under these facilities; however, we utilized ~~$56~~$257 million under these facilities primarily for the issuance of letters of credit

for the benefit of one of our ~~lifestyle protection~~life insurance subsidiaries.

~~In June 2011,~~ At this time, we do not intend to renew our ~~indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited, issued AUD$140 million~~revolving credit facility that matures in May 2012. As we approach the maturity date for our August credit facility, we are evaluating, and will continue to evaluate, our options to extend, replace or refinance a portion of ~~subordinated floating rate notes due 2021 with an interest rate of three-month Bank Bill Swap reference rate plus a margin of 4.75%. Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Pty Limited expects~~our credit facility. There can be no assurance that we will be able to ~~use the proceeds it received from~~extend, replace or refinance this ~~transaction for general corporate purposes.~~

~~During the second quarter of 2011, we repaid ¥57.0 billion of senior notes that matured in June 2011, plus accrued interest. In addition, the arrangements~~facility on terms (or at targeted amounts) acceptable to ~~swap our obligations under these notes to a U.S. dollar obligation matured. These swaps had a notional principal amount of $491 million with interest~~us or at ~~a rate of 4.84% per year. Upon maturity of these swaps, we received $212 million from the derivative counterparty resulting in a net repayment of $491 million of principal related to these notes.~~

In March ~~2011,~~2012, we ~~issued~~priced a $350 million reopening of our 7.625% senior notes ~~having~~due in September 2021. The notes were offered as additional debt securities under an indenture, as supplemented from time to time, pursuant to which we have previously issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of ~~$400 million, with an interest rate equal to~~our 7.625% ~~per year payable semi-annually, and maturing~~senior notes due in September ~~2021 (“2021 Notes”).~~2021. The ~~2021 Notes~~notes are our direct, unsecured obligations and will rank equally with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated obligations. ~~We have the option to redeem all or a portion of the 2021 Notes at any time with proper notice to the note holders~~The notes were issued at a public offering price ~~equal to the greater~~ of ~~100%~~103% of principal ~~or the sum~~amount, with a yield to maturity of ~~the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the then-current treasury rate plus an applicable spread.~~7.184%. The net proceeds of ~~$397~~$358 million from the issuance of the ~~2021 Notes~~new notes were used for general corporate ~~purposes.~~purposes, including increasing liquidity at the holding company level.

As of March 31, 2012, we had $2.6 billion of fixed and floating rate non-recourse funding obligations outstanding backing additional statutory reserves. In ~~the second quarter~~January 2012, as part of ~~2011,~~a life block sale transaction, we repurchased ~~principal of $57~~$475 million of ~~notes secured by~~ our non-recourse funding obligations ~~plus accrued interest, for a pre-tax gain of $17 million.~~

~~In June 2011, Genworth Canada, our indirect subsidiary, repurchased approximately 6.2 million common shares for CAD$160 million through a substantial issuer bid. Brookfield,~~issued by River Lake III, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, ~~participated~~resulting in a U.S. GAAP after-tax gain of approximately $52 million. In connection with the ~~issuer bid~~repurchase, we ceded certain term life insurance policies to a third-party reinsurer resulting in a U.S. GAAP after-tax loss, net of amortization of deferred acquisition costs, of $93 million. The combined transactions resulted in a U.S. GAAP after-tax loss of approximately $41 million which was included in our U.S. Life Insurance segment. In February and March 2012, we repaid the remaining non-recourse funding obligations issued by ~~making a proportionate tender and received CAD$90 million and continues to hold approximately 57.5%~~River Lake III of ~~the outstanding common shares of Genworth Canada.~~$176 million.

We believe existing holding company cash combined with proceeds from the issuance of debt, including borrowings pursuant to our ~~revolving~~ credit facilities (to the extent available), dividends from our subsidiaries, permitted payments to us under our tax sharing arrangements with our subsidiaries and ~~anticipated cash flows from operations~~sales of assets will provide us with sufficient capital flexibility and liquidity to meet our future operating ~~requirements, as well as optimize our capital structure.~~requirements. In addition, we actively monitor our liquidity position, liquidity generation options and the credit markets given changing market conditions. However, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact to us from any ~~further~~future disruptions in the credit markets or further downgrades by one or more of the rating agencies of the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries and/or the credit ratings of our holding company. The availability of additional funding will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, regulatory considerations, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, the level of activity and availability of reinsurers, our credit ratings and credit capacity and the performance of and outlook for our business.

Contractual obligations and commercial commitments

We enter into obligations to third parties in the ordinary course of our operations. However, we do not believe that our cash flow requirements can be assessed based upon analysis of these obligations as the funding of these future cash obligations will be from future cash flows from premiums, deposits, fees and investment

income that are not reflected herein. Future cash outflows, whether they are contractual obligations or not, also will vary based upon our future needs. Although some outflows are fixed, others depend on future events. Examples of fixed obligations include our obligations to pay principal and interest on fixed-rate borrowings. Examples of obligations that will vary include obligations to pay interest on variable-rate borrowings and insurance liabilities that depend on future interest rates and market performance. Many of our obligations are linked to cash-generating contracts. These obligations include payments to contractholders that assume those contractholders will continue to make deposits in accordance with the terms of their contracts. In addition, our operations involve significant expenditures that are not based upon “commitments.”

There have been no material additions or changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as set forth in our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February ~~25, 2011,~~27, 2012, except as discussed above under “—Capital resources and financing activities.”

Securitization Entities

There were no off-balance sheet securitization transactions during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 or ~~2010.~~2011.

New Accounting Standards

For a discussion of recently adopted and not yet adopted accounting standards, see note 2 in our “—Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of the loss of fair value resulting from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. Market risk is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying financial instruments are traded. The following is a discussion of our market risk exposures and our risk management practices.

Credit markets ~~continued to show~~showed signs of improvement across most asset classes in the first ~~half~~quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. Additionally, U.S. Treasury yields remained at historically low levels during the first quarter of 2012. See “—Business trends and conditions” and “—Investments and Derivative Instruments” in “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of recent market conditions.

In the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2011,~~2012, the U.S. dollar weakened against currencies in Canada, Australia and Europe ~~strengthened against the U.S. dollar~~ as compared to ~~the second quarter of 2010 and~~ the first quarter of 2011. This has generally resulted in higher levels of reported revenues and net income, ~~(loss),~~ assets, liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in our U.S. dollar consolidated financial statements. See “Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion on the impact changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

There were no other material changes in these risks since December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of ~~June 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, an evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, the Acting Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During the Quarter Ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~six months~~quarter ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We face the risk of litigation and regulatory investigations and actions in the ordinary course of operating our businesses, including the risk of class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and others generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance operations, we are, have been, or may become subject to class actions and individual suits alleging, among other things, issues relating to sales or underwriting practices, increases to in-force long-term care insurance premiums, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, bidding practices in connection with our management and administration of a third-party’s municipal guaranteed investment contract business, claims payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, administration, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, recommending unsuitable products to customers, our pricing structures and business practices in our mortgage insurance businesses, such as captive reinsurance arrangements with lenders and contract underwriting services, violations of RESPA or related state anti-inducement laws, and breaching fiduciary or other duties to customers. Plaintiffs in class action and other lawsuits against us may seek very large or indeterminate amounts which may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In our investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving commercial disputes with counterparties. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities such as our contractual and employment relationships. In addition, we are also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas, books and record examinations and market conduct and financial examinations from state, federal and international regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or a significant regulatory action against us could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory action or investigation, we could suffer significant reputational harm, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Except as ~~disclosed~~described below, there were no material developments during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 in any of the legal proceedings identified in Part I, Item 3 of our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form ~~10-K, as updated in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011.~~10-K. In addition, except as ~~described~~set forth below, there were no new material legal proceedings during the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

~~On June 22,~~As previously disclosed, in December 2011, weone of our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries received a subpoena from the ~~office~~United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the ~~New York Attorney~~Inspector General with respect to reinsurance arrangements, including captive reinsurance transactions. That subpoena was withdrawn subsequent to our subsidiary’s receipt of an information request from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in January 2012, relating to ~~an industry-wide investigation~~the same subject matter.

As previously disclosed, in December 2011 and January 2012, one of ~~unclaimed property~~our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries was named along with several other mortgage insurance participants and ~~escheatment~~mortgage lenders as a defendant in three putative class action lawsuits alleging that certain “captive reinsurance arrangements” were in violation of RESPA. Four additional putative class actions, making similar allegations, have since been filed in which our mortgage insurance subsidiary is again named as one of numerous defendants. Those cases are captioned as follows:McCarn, et al. v. HSB, et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of California;Manners, et al, v. First Third Bank, et al., United States District court for the Western District of Pennsylvania;Riddle, et al. v Bank of America, et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; andRulison et al. v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. We intend to vigorously defend these actions.

handling practices ~~and procedures. In~~in connection with denying, curtailing or rescinding coverage of mortgage insurance. Claimants seek damages in excess of $834 million, in addition to ~~the subpoena, other state regulators are conducting reviews~~interest and ~~examinations on the same subject.~~punitive damages. We ~~are cooperating with~~intend to vigorously defend these ~~requests and inquiries.~~actions.

We cannot ensure that the current investigations and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, it is possible that related investigations and proceedings may be commenced in the future, and we could become subject to additional unrelated investigations and lawsuits. Increased regulatory scrutiny and any resulting investigations or proceedings could result in new legal precedents and industry-wide regulations or practices that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained in Item 1A of our ~~2010~~2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. ~~As of June 30, 2011,~~Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the above-referenced ~~filing.~~filing as of March 31, 2012.

~~Item 5.~~

~~Other Information~~

~~Genworth Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains~~Adverse market or other conditions might further delay or impede the ~~Amended~~planned IPO of our mortgage insurance business in Australia.

On November 3, 2011, we announced our plan to sell a minority position of up to 40% of our Australian mortgage insurance business through an IPO in Australia during 2012. On April 17, 2012, we announced that we are now seeking to complete this transaction in early 2013, subject to market conditions, valuation considerations including business performance, and ~~Restated 2005 Change~~regulatory approvals. This new timeframe primarily reflects recent business performance in Australia. While we expect this transaction is achievable, there can be no assurance that this transaction can be executed within the new targeted timeframe, on the desired terms, or at all.

The information in this Quarterly Report concerning the IPO securities is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of ~~Control Plan (the “2005 Plan”),~~an offer to buy, any securities. The IPO securities referred to in this Quarterly Report have not been and will not be registered under ~~which severance benefits are~~the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to ~~certain~~an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the ~~Company’s key executives, including executive officers,~~U.S. Securities Act of 1933. If an offer of IPO securities which requires disclosure in Australia is made, a disclosure document for the event that their employment is terminated in connection with a change of control of the Company. The Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company reviews the 2005 Plan annually. Following the Committee’s 2011 review, the Committee decided that thereoffer will be ~~no new participants under the 2005 Plan and~~prepared at that ~~a new plan should be created~~time. Any person who wishes to ~~offer comparable severance benefits to newly designated key executives. On August 1, 2011, the Committee adopted the Genworth Financial, Inc. 2011 Change of Control Plan (the “2011 Plan”).~~

The 2011 Plan is identical to the 2005 Plan, except that the 2011 Plan does not provide participants with any tax gross-up benefits. Consistent with the 2005 Plan, the 2011 Plan includes two tiers of benefits that apply to ~~executives who are designated by~~acquire IPO securities will need to complete the ~~Committee. Upon adoption of~~application form that will be in or will accompany the 2011 Plan, Tier I benefits initially apply to Martin P. Klein, who was previously appointed Senior Vice President—Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective May 11, 2011, and Tier II benefits initially apply to selected other executives approved by the Committee. The following summary of the 2011 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2011 Plan, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to this report.

~~Summary of 2011 Plan~~

Benefits under the 2011 Plan are paid only upon the occurrence of two clearly defined events. First, a change of control of the Company (as defined in the 2011 Plan) must have occurred. Second, in order to be eligible for benefits under the 2011 Plan, the designated executive’s employment must either be terminated without cause (and not as a result of death or permanent disability), or by the designated executive for “good reason,” in each case within 24 months from the date of a change of control. Such employment terminations are referred to as a “Qualified Termination.”

~~Upon the occurrence of a Qualified Termination, a participating executive will receive the following severance benefits:~~

•

~~Cash payment~~. A Tier I executive will receive 200% of the sum of his or her base salary and a targeted annual incentive payment; a Tier II executive will receive 150% of the sum of his or her base salary and a targeted annual incentive payment.

•

~~Short-term incentive award~~. The participating executive will receive a pro-rated bonus earned for the portion of the year worked in which termination occurs, based on the executive’s targeted annual incentive payment and the number of days in the year prior to the Qualified Termination.

•

~~Equity-based incentive awards~~. All performance-based equity awards will become fully vested based on a target level of performance, and will payout pro rata based on the portion of the performance period elapsed prior to the Qualified Termination. Stock options, restricted stock units and other time-vesting equity awards will become immediately vested, and all restrictions on shares subject to awards will lapse, except for the portion of any award of restricted stock units that vest upon retirement.

•
~~Retirement provisions~~. The participating executive will be fully and immediately vested in any funded or unfunded or nonqualified pension or deferred compensation plans in which he or she participates, with payment being made in accordance with the terms of such plans.

•

~~Health and welfare benefits~~~~. The participating executive will receive health and welfare benefit coverage for 18 months.~~

disclosure document. In addition, ~~upon a Qualified Termination, if a participating executive elects to enter into a non-competition agreement~~the information in this Quarterly Report concerning the IPO securities is not intended for ~~18 months, then he or she will be entitled to receive the following enhanced benefits,~~public distribution in ~~addition to the benefits described above:~~Australia.

•

~~Cash payment~~. Upon the expiration and successful completion of the non-competition agreement, a Tier I executive will receive an additional payment equal to 100% of the sum of his or her base salary and a targeted annual incentive payment. A Tier II executive will receive an additional payment equal to 50% of the sum of his or her base salary and a targeted annual incentive payment.

•

~~Equity-based incentive awards~~~~. The restrictions on an award of restricted stock units that vest upon retirement shall immediately lapse.~~

Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a 20% excise tax on individuals who receive compensation in connection with a change of control that exceeds certain specified limits (generally three times his or her average taxable compensation over the last five or fewer years). Because of the way the excise tax is applied, a participant could be better off on an after-tax basis in some instances by taking a lower severance benefit in order to avoid the excise tax. The 2011 Plan provides for such a cut back of benefits, but only if the participant would be benefited by the cut back.

To receive any severance benefits under the 2011 Plan, a participant must execute a general release of claims against the Company and agree to certain restrictive covenants, including restrictions on the use of confidential information and restrictions on the solicitation of customers and employees for 18 months following a Qualified Termination.

~~The 2011 Plan became effective August 1, 2011. It is attached as Exhibit 10 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.~~

Item 6.

Exhibits


~~3.1~~
10.1		Amended and Restated ~~Certificate of Incorporation of Genworth Financial, Inc.~~

~~3.2~~		~~Certificate of Retirement of 5.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock of Genworth Financial, Inc.~~

10		Genworth Financial, Inc. ~~2011 Change of Control~~Retirement and Savings Restoration Plan

10.2		Amended and Restated Genworth Financial, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

12		Statement of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges

~~31.1~~ 18		~~Certification~~Preferability Letter of ~~Michael D. Fraizer~~KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Accounting Firm

~~31.2~~ 31		Certification of Martin P. Klein

~~32.1~~ 32		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code—~~Michael D. Fraizer~~

~~32.2~~		~~Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code—~~Martin P. Klein

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC. ~~(Registrant)~~(REGISTRANT)
Date: ~~August 2, 2011~~May 4, 2012

	By:	/s/S/ AMY R. CORBIN
		Amy R. Corbin
		Vice President and Controller
		(Duly Authorized Officer and
		Principal Accounting Officer)

~~141~~136


(Amounts in millions)	Three months ended June 30, 2010		Six months ended June 30, 2010
Beginning balance	$	52	$	48
Provision⁽¹⁾		18		22
Release		—		—

Ending balance	$	70	$	70


	Three months ended June 30,						Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010
Interest rate swaps	$	2		$	63		Net investment gains (losses)
Equity return swaps		(6	)		—		Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		(4	)		(9	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaptions		—			35		Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps		—			(32	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		(4	)		(46	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Equity index options		(9	)		50		Net investment gains (losses)
Financial futures		34			105		Net investment gains (losses)
Other foreign currency contracts		(4	)		2		Net investment gains (losses)
Reinsurance embedded derivatives		(1	)		2		Net investment gains (losses)
GMWB embedded derivatives		(33	)		(278	)	Net investment gains (losses)

Total derivatives not designated as hedges	$	(25	)	$	(108	)


	Six months ended June 30,						Classification of gain (loss) recognized in net income (loss)
(Amounts in millions)	2011			2010
Interest rate swaps	$	4		$	57		Net investment gains (losses)
Equity return swaps		(10	)		—		Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaps related to securitization entities		(3	)		(12	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Interest rate swaptions		—			57		Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps		3			(27	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Credit default swaps related to securitization entities		5			(41	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Equity index options		(28	)		23		Net investment gains (losses)
Financial futures		(5	)		72		Net investment gains (losses)
Other foreign currency contracts		(13	)		(1	)	Net investment gains (losses)
Reinsurance embedded derivatives		(1	)		2		Net investment gains (losses)
GMWB embedded derivatives		26			(242	)	Net investment gains (losses)

Total derivatives not designated as hedges	$	(22	)	$	(112	)


	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2010			Total realized and unrealized gains (losses)					Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net			Transfer in Level 3		Transfer out of Level 3 ⁽¹⁾			Ending balance as of June 30, 2010		Total gains (losses) included in net income (loss) attributable to assets still held
(Amounts in millions)	Beginning balance as of January 1, 2010			Included in net income (loss)			Included in OCI		Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net			Transfer in Level 3		Transfer out of Level 3 ⁽¹⁾			Ending balance as of June 30, 2010
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government, agencies and government-sponsored enterprises	$	16		$	—		$	—	$	(2	)	$	9	$	(14	)	$	9	$	—
Tax-exempt		2			—			—		—			—		(2	)		—		—
Government—non-U.S.		7			—			1		—			16		(6	)		18		—
U.S. corporate		1,073			11			34		31			678		(307	)		1,520		8
Corporate—non-U.S.		504			1			8		11			353		(157	)		720		1
Residential mortgage- backed		1,481			—			3		80			1		(1,503	)		62		—
Commercial mortgage- backed		3,558			1			14		(63	)		11		(3,462	)		59		—
Other asset-backed		1,419			(24	)		23		(18	)		10		(1,049	)		361		(24	)

Total fixed maturity securities		8,060			(11	)		83		39			1,078		(6,500	)		2,749		(15	)

Equity securities		9			—			—		8			52		(60	)		9		—

Other invested assets:
Trading securities		145			1			—		(10	)		—		—			136		1
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps		3			6			—		—			—		—			9		6
Interest rate swaptions		54			15			—		(65	)		—		—			4		15
Credit default swaps		6			(6	)		—		—			—		—			—		(6	)
Equity index options		39			22			—		36			—		—			97		22
Other foreign currency contracts		8			(7	)		—		—			—		—			1		(7	)

Total derivative assets		110			30			—		(29	)		—		—			111		30

Total other invested assets		255			31			—		(39	)		—		—			247		31

Restricted other invested assets related to securitization entities		—			(2	)		2		—			174		—			174		(2	)
Reinsurance recoverable⁽²⁾		(5	)		14			—		—			—		—			9		14

Total Level 3 assets	$	8,319		$	32		$	85	$	8		$	1,304	$	(6,560	)	$	3,188	$	28


	As of or for the six months ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2011⁽¹⁾			2010⁽²⁾
Beginning balance	$	6,933		$	6,567
Less reinsurance recoverables		(1,654	)		(1,769	)

Net beginning balance		5,279			4,798

Incurred related to insured events of:
Current year		1,720			1,641
Prior years		494			120

Total incurred		2,214			1,761

Paid related to insured events of:
Current year		(475	)		(452	)
Prior years		(1,373	)		(1,539	)

Total paid		(1,848	)		(1,991	)

Interest on liability for policy and contract claims		67			59
Foreign currency translation		37			(63	)

Net ending balance		5,749			4,564
Add reinsurance recoverables		1,578			1,738

Ending balance	$	7,327		$	6,302


	Three months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change					Six months ended June 30,				Increase (decrease) and percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2011		2010		2011 vs. 2010					2011		2010		2011 vs. 2010
Term life insurance
Net earned premiums	$	218	$	228	$	(10	)	(4	)%	$	437	$	452	$	(15	)	(3	)%
Annualized first-year premiums		—		4		(4	)	(100	)%		—		18		(18	)	(100	)%
Term universal life insurance
Net deposits	$	45	$	14	$	31		NM	⁽¹⁾	$	80	$	19	$	61		NM	⁽¹⁾
Annualized first-year deposits		36		24		12		50	%		67		34		33		97	%
Universal and whole life insurance
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	156	$	121	$	35		29	%	$	318	$	239	$	79		33	%
Universal life annualized first-year deposits		9		10		(1	)	(10	)%		20		17		3		18	%
Universal life excess deposits		35		28		7		25	%		71		48		23		48	%
Linked-benefits⁽²⁾		25		—		25		NM	⁽¹⁾		48		—		48		NM	⁽¹⁾
Total life insurance
Net earned premiums and deposits	$	419	$	363	$	56		15	%	$	835	$	710	$	125		18	%
Annualized first-year premiums		—		4		(4	)	(100	)%		—		18		(18	)	(100	)%
Annualized first-year deposits		45		34		11		32	%		87		51		36		71	%
Universal life excess deposits		35		28		7		25	%		71		48		23		48	%
Linked-benefits⁽²⁾		25		—		25		NM	⁽¹⁾		48		—		48		NM	⁽¹⁾


	As of June 30,				Percentage change
(Amounts in millions)	2011		2010		2011 vs. 2010
Term life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	447,336	$	468,098		(4	)%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		580,113		612,284		(5	)%
Term universal life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	73,569	$	17,754		NM	⁽¹⁾
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		74,107		17,820		NM	⁽¹⁾
Universal and whole life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	44,207	$	43,743		1	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		50,884		50,617		1	%
Total life insurance
Life insurance in-force, net of reinsurance	$	565,112	$	529,595		7	%
Life insurance in-force before reinsurance		705,104		680,721		4	%


	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			June 30, 2010
Primary insurance:
Insured loans in-force		3,004,011			2,986,059			2,938,624
Delinquent loans		22,495			21,082			22,093
Percentage of delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.75	%		0.71	%		0.75	%

Flow loans in-force		2,486,842			2,468,354			2,447,543
Flow delinquent loans		19,070			17,684			19,219
Percentage of flow delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.77	%		0.72	%		0.79	%

Bulk loans in-force		517,169			517,705			491,081
Bulk delinquent loans⁽¹⁾		3,425			3,398			2,874
Percentage of bulk delinquent loans (delinquency rate)		0.66	%		0.66	%		0.59	%


	Percent of primary risk in-force as of June 30, 2011			Percent of total reserves as of June 30, 2011 ⁽¹⁾			Delinquency rate
	Percent of primary risk in-force as of June 30, 2011			Percent of total reserves as of June 30, 2011 ⁽¹⁾			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			June 30, 2010
By Region:
Southeast⁽²⁾		22	%		35	%		16.37	%		16.79	%		17.06	%
South Central⁽³⁾		16			12			9.90	%		11.00	%		11.41	%
Northeast⁽⁴⁾		14			12			11.71	%		11.66	%		10.85	%
North Central⁽⁵⁾		12			11			11.36	%		11.51	%		11.50	%
Pacific⁽⁶⁾		11			13			13.29	%		14.39	%		15.83	%
Great Lakes⁽⁷⁾		9			7			8.49	%		8.92	%		9.08	%
Plains⁽⁸⁾		6			3			7.75	%		8.14	%		7.59	%
New England⁽⁹⁾		5			3			10.36	%		10.71	%		11.11	%
Mid-Atlantic⁽¹⁰⁾		5			4			10.12	%		10.67	%		11.23	%

Total		100	%		100	%		11.71	%		12.21	%		12.39	%

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company