(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~registrant~~registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES NO X

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of ~~April 20,~~July 16, 2012: ~~1,563,964,807~~1,556,274,656


	12 Weeks Ended						12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Net Revenue	$	12,428		$	11,937		$	16,458		$	16,827		$	28,886		$	28,764

Cost of sales		5,889			5,447			7,915			7,963			13,804			13,410
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4,792			4,739			6,136			6,070			10,928			10,809
Amortization of intangible assets		25			25			30			40			55			65


Operating Profit		1,722			1,726			2,377			2,754			4,099			4,480

Interest expense		(198	)		(180	)		(209	)		(199	)		(407	)		(379	)
Interest income and other		23			17			1			20			24			37

Income before income taxes		1,547			1,563			2,169			2,575			3,716			4,138

Provision for income taxes		414			419			668			670			1,082			1,089

Net income		1,133			1,144			1,501			1,905			2,634			3,049

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		6			1			13			20			19			21


Net Income Attributable to PepsiCo	$	1,127		$	1,143		$	1,488		$	1,885		$	2,615		$	3,028


Net Income Attributable to PepsiCo per Common Share
Basic	$	0.72		$	0.72		$	0.95		$	1.19		$	1.67		$	1.91
Diluted	$	0.71		$	0.71		$	0.94		$	1.17		$	1.65		$	1.89

Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic		1,568			1,583			1,563			1,583			1,565			1,583
Diluted		1,584			1,605			1,581			1,605			1,583			1,605

Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.515		$	0.48		$	0.5375		$	0.515		$	1.0525		$	0.995


	12 Weeks Ended						12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Net Income	$	1,133		$	1,144		$	1,501		$	1,905		$	2,634		$	3,049
Other Comprehensive Income
Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income
Currency translation adjustment		1,687			645			(2,231	)		809			(544	)		1,454
Cash flow hedges, net of tax:
Net derivative (losses)/gains^(a)		(14	)		8
Reclassification of net losses to net income^(b⁾		7			4
Net derivative losses^(a)								(11	)		(25	)		(25	)		(17	)
Reclassification of net losses to net income^(b)								17			3			24			7
Pension and retiree medical, net of tax:
Reclassification of losses/(gains) to net income⁽^c⁾		25			(3	)
Remeasurement of net liabilities⁽^d⁾		7			–
Unrealized gains/(losses) on securities, net of tax⁽^e⁾		13			(13	)
Reclassification of losses to net income^(c)								61			26			86			23
Remeasurement of net liabilities^(d)								–			–			7			–
Unrealized (losses)/gains on securities, net of tax^(e)								(10	)		11			3			(2	)
Other		36			(18	)		–			1			36			(17	)

Total Other Comprehensive Income		1,761			623
Total Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income								(2,174	)		825			(413	)		1,448

Comprehensive Income		2,894			1,767
Comprehensive (Loss)/Income								(673	)		2,730			2,221			4,497
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2	)		(29	)		(11	)		(64	)		(13	)		(93	)

Comprehensive Income Attributable to PepsiCo	$	2,892		$	1,738
Comprehensive (Loss)/Income Attributable to PepsiCo							$	(684	)	$	2,666		$	2,208		$	4,404


	12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Operating Activities
Net income	$	1,133		$	1,144		$	2,634		$	3,049
Depreciation and amortization		555			523			1,201			1,187
Stock-based compensation expense		56			72			125			146
Restructuring and impairment charges		33			–			110			–
Cash payments for restructuring charges		(44	)		(1	)		(140	)		(1	)
Merger and integration charges		2			55			5			113
Cash payments for merger and integration charges		(20	)		(117	)		(47	)		(207	)
Restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp. (Tingyi)								163			–
Cash payments for restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi								(88	)		–
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		(35	)		(24	)		(53	)		(52	)
Pension and retiree medical plan contributions		(1,100	)		(59	)		(1,169	)		(116	)
Pension and retiree medical plan expenses		129			119			271			254
Deferred income taxes and other tax charges and credits		120			(98	)		85			(146	)
Change in accounts and notes receivable		(71	)		(271	)		(1,084	)		(1,491	)
Change in inventories		(266	)		(77	)		(643	)		(742	)
Change in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(197	)		(137	)		(196	)		(144	)
Change in accounts payable and other current liabilities		(960	)		(1,028	)		(193	)		(65	)
Change in income taxes payable		90			362			432			849
Other, net		(115	)		(83	)		(166	)		(281	)

Net Cash (Used for)/Provided by Operating Activities		(690	)		380
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities								1,247			2,353


Investing Activities
Capital spending		(316	)		(433	)		(901	)		(1,231	)
Sales of property, plant and equipment		17			12			42			34
Acquisition of Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC (WBD), net of cash and cash equivalents acquired		–			(2,428	)		–			(2,428	)
Investment in WBD		–			(164	)		–			(164	)
Cash payments related to the transaction with Tingyi								(298	)		–
Other acquisitions and investments in noncontrolled affiliates		(32	)		(28	)		(49	)		(61	)
Divestitures		9			–			14			–
Short-term investments, by original maturity
More than three months – maturities		–			6			–			10
Three months or less, net		52			57			41			(10	)
Other investing, net		13			(1	)		13			(2	)

Net Cash Used for Investing Activities		(257	)		(2,979	)		(1,138	)		(3,852	)


	12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt	$	2,733		$	9		$	2,733		$	1,754
Payments of long-term debt		(9	)		(10	)		(1,034	)		(285	)
Short-term borrowings, by original maturity
More than three months – proceeds		13			21			53			180
More than three months – payments		(107	)		(64	)		(189	)		(152	)
Three months or less, net		(1,696	)		1,160			462			(290	)
Cash dividends paid		(816	)		(769	)		(1,626	)		(1,530	)
Share repurchases – common		(142	)		(361	)		(1,206	)		(746	)
Share repurchases – preferred		(1	)		(2	)		(3	)		(4	)
Proceeds from exercises of stock options		274			218			496			652
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		35			24			53			52
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests								(12	)		(1,327	)
Other financing		(1	)		–			(19	)		(3	)

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		283			226
Net Cash Used for Financing Activities								(292	)		(1,699	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		82			92			(21	)		168
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(582	)		(2,281	)		(204	)		(3,030	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year		4,067			5,943			4,067			5,943

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	3,485		$	3,662		$	3,863		$	2,913


	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	3/24/12			12/31/11			6/16/12			12/31/11
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,485		$	4,067		$	3,863		$	4,067

Short-term investments		328			358			330			358

Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance: 3/12 – $168, 12/11 – $157		7,158			6,912
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance: 6/12 – $159, 12/11 – $157								7,721			6,912

Inventories
Raw materials		2,071			1,883			1,991			1,883
Work-in-process		302			207			351			207
Finished goods		1,841			1,737			1,932			1,737

		4,214			3,827			4,274			3,827

Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,393			2,277			1,845			2,277

Total Current Assets		17,578			17,441			18,033			17,441

Property, Plant and Equipment		36,193			35,140			34,271			35,140
Accumulated Depreciation		(16,188	)		(15,442	)		(15,757	)		(15,442	)

		20,005			19,698			18,514			19,698

Amortizable Intangible Assets, net		1,960			1,888			1,809			1,888

Goodwill		17,208			16,800			16,456			16,800
Other Nonamortizable Intangible Assets		15,093			14,557			14,399			14,557

Nonamortizable Intangible Assets		32,301			31,357			30,855			31,357

Investments in Noncontrolled Affiliates		1,515			1,477			1,562			1,477
Other Assets		1,032			1,021			1,617			1,021


Total Assets	$	74,391		$	72,882		$	72,390		$	72,882


	12 Weeks Ended												24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12						3/19/11						6/16/12						6/11/11
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
Preferred Stock		0.8		$	41			0.8		$	41			0.8		$	41			0.8		$	41

Repurchased Preferred Stock
Balance, beginning of year		(0.6	)		(157	)		(0.6	)		(150	)		(0.6	)		(157	)		(0.6	)		(150	)
Redemptions		(–	)		(1	)		(–	)		(2	)		(–	)		(3	)		(–	)		(4	)

Balance, end of period		(0.6	)		(158	)		(0.6	)		(152	)		(0.6	)		(160	)		(0.6	)		(154	)

Common Stock		1,865			31			1,865			31			1,865			31			1,865			31

Capital in Excess of Par Value
Balance, beginning of year					4,461						4,527						4,461						4,527
Stock-based compensation expense					56						72						125						146
Stock option exercises/RSUs converted^(a)					(194	)					(160	)					(275	)					(281	)
Withholding tax on RSUs converted					(52	)					(40	)					(60	)					(50	)
Other					(20	)					8						(28	)					16

Balance, end of period					4,251						4,407						4,223						4,358

Retained Earnings
Balance, beginning of year					40,316						37,090						40,316						37,090
Net income attributable to PepsiCo					1,127						1,143						2,615						3,028
Cash dividends declared – common					(809	)					(762	)					(1,649	)					(1,580	)
Cash dividends declared – preferred																	(1	)					(1	)
Cash dividends declared – RSUs					(3	)					(5	)					(7	)					(10	)

Balance, end of period					40,631						37,466						41,274						38,527

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance, beginning of year					(6,229	)					(3,630	)					(6,229	)					(3,630	)
Currency translation adjustment					1,691						617						(538	)					1,382
Cash flow hedges, net of tax:
Net derivative (losses)/gains					(14	)					8
Net derivative losses																	(25	)					(17	)
Reclassification of net losses to net income					7						4						24						7
Pension and retiree medical, net of tax:
Reclassification of net losses/(gains) to net income					25						(3	)
Reclassification of net losses to net income																	86						23
Remeasurement of net liabilities					7						–						7						–
Unrealized gains/(losses) on securities, net of tax					13						(13	)					3						(2	)
Other					36						(18	)					36						(17	)

Balance, end of period					(4,464	)					(3,035	)					(6,636	)					(2,254	)

Repurchased Common Stock
Balance, beginning of year		(301	)		(17,875	)		(284	)		(16,745	)		(301	)		(17,875	)		(284	)		(16,745	)
Share repurchases		(5	)		(294	)		(7	)		(413	)		(19	)		(1,253	)		(12	)		(811	)
Stock option exercises		6			356			5			296			11			676			14			858
Other		2			122			2			89			2			136			1			101

Balance, end of period		(298	)		(17,691	)		(284	)		(16,773	)		(307	)		(18,316	)		(281	)		(16,597	)

Total Common Shareholders’ Equity					22,758						22,096						20,576						24,065

Noncontrolling Interests
Balance, beginning of year					311						312						311						312
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests					6						1						19						21
Distributions to noncontrolling interests																	(15	)					(9	)
Currency translation adjustment					(4	)					28						(6	)					72
Acquisitions and divestitures					(1	)					1,348						(171	)					22
Other, net					1						–

Balance, end of period					313						1,689						138						418

Total Equity				$	22,954					$	23,674					$	20,595					$	24,370

Our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the 12 and 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012 and June 11, 2011, and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Equity for the 1224 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011 have not been audited. These statements have been prepared on a basis that is substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. In our opinion, these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. The results for the 12 and 24 weeks are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

While the majority of our results are reported on a period basis, most of our international operations report on a monthly calendar basis for which the months of ~~January~~March, April and ~~February~~May are reflected in our ~~first~~second quarter results.

In the first quarter of 2011, Quaker Foods North America (QFNA) changed its method of accounting for certain U.S. inventories from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the average cost method. This change was considered preferable by management as we believe that the average cost method of accounting for all U.S. foods inventories improves our financial reporting by better matching revenues and expenses and better reflecting the current value of inventory. In addition, the change from the LIFO method to the average cost method enhances the comparability of QFNA’s financial results with our other food businesses, as well as with peer companies where the average cost method is widely used. The impact of this change on consolidated net income in the first quarter of 2011 was approximately $9 million (or less than a penny per share).

Our significant interim accounting policies include the recognition of a pro rata share of certain estimated annual sales incentives, and certain advertising and marketing costs, in proportion to revenue and volume, as applicable, and the recognition of income taxes using an estimated annual effective tax rate. Raw materials, direct labor and plant overhead, as well as purchasing and receiving costs, costs directly related to production planning, inspection costs and raw material handling facilities, are included in cost of sales. The costs of moving, storing and delivering finished product are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following information is unaudited. Tabular dollars are in millions, except per share amounts. All per share amounts reflect common per share amounts, assume dilution unless otherwise noted, and are based on unrounded amounts. Certain reclassifications were made to the prior year’s amounts to conform to the 2012 presentation. This report should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

PepsiCo Americas Beverages (PAB), which includes all of our North American and Latin American beverage businesses;

Our four business units comprise six reportable segments (also referred to as divisions), as follows:


											12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
											6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Net Revenue
FLNA											$	3,193		$	3,090		$	6,203		$	5,994
QFNA												583			583			1,206			1,223
LAF												1,948			1,808			3,183			2,916
PAB												5,352			5,629			9,800			10,160
Europe												3,617			3,794			5,462			5,420
AMEA												1,765			1,923			3,032			3,051

	12 Weeks Ended										$	16,458		$	16,827		$	28,886		$	28,764
	Net Revenue				Operating Profit
	3/24/12		3/19/11		3/24/12			3/19/11
											12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
											6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Operating Profit
FLNA	$	3,010	$	2,904	$	780		$	774		$	835		$	853		$	1,615		$	1,627
QFNA		623		640		187			214			154			167			341			381
LAF		1,235		1,108		183			171			271			274			454			445
PAB		4,448		4,531		525			558			840			983			1,365			1,541
Europe		1,845		1,626		81			63			453			407			534			470
AMEA		1,267		1,128		148			146			165			299			313			445

Total division		12,428		11,937		1,904			1,926			2,718			2,983			4,622			4,909
Corporate Unallocated
Net impact of mark-to-market on commodity hedges						84			31			(79	)		(9	)		5			22
Restructuring and impairment charges						2			–			(3	)		–			(1	)		–
Merger and integration charges						–			(42	)		(2	)		(12	)		(2	)		(54	)
Other						(268	)		(189	)		(257	)		(208	)		(525	)		(397	)

	$	12,428	$	11,937	$	1,722		$	1,726		$	2,377		$	2,754		$	4,099		$	4,480


	Total Assets				Total Assets
	3/24/12		12/31/11		6/16/12		12/31/11
FLNA	$	6,075	$	6,120	$	6,109	$	6,120
QFNA		1,205		1,174		1,177		1,174
LAF		4,967		4,731		4,613		4,731
PAB		31,690		31,187		31,980		31,187
Europe		19,755		18,479		18,523		18,479
AMEA		6,305		6,048		5,511		6,048

Total division		69,997		67,739		67,913		67,739
Corporate^(a⁾		4,394		5,143
Corporate^(a)						4,477		5,143

	$	74,391	$	72,882	$	72,390	$	72,882

On February 3, 2011, we acquired the ordinary shares, including shares underlying American Depositary Shares (ADS) and Global Depositary Shares (GDS), of WBD, a company incorporated in the Russian Federation, which represented in the aggregate approximately 66% of WBD’s outstanding ordinary shares, pursuant to the purchase agreement dated December 1, 2010 between PepsiCo and certain selling shareholders of WBD for approximately $3.8 billion in cash. The acquisition of those shares increased our total ownership to approximately 77%, giving us a controlling interest in WBD. Under the guidance on accounting for business combinations, once a controlling interest is obtained, we are required to recognize and measure 100% of the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests at their full fair values. Our fair market valuations of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been completed and the final valuations did not materially differ from those fair values reported as of December 31, 2011.

On March 10, 2011, we commenced tender offers in Russia and the U.S. for all remaining outstanding ordinary shares and ADSs of WBD for 3,883.70 Russian rubles per ordinary share and 970.925 Russian rubles per ADS, respectively. The Russian offer was made to all holders of ordinary shares and the U.S. offer was made to all holders of ADSs. We completed the Russian offer on May 19, 2011 and the U.S. offer on May 16, 2011. After completion of the offers, we paid approximately $1.3 billion for WBD’s ordinary shares (including shares underlying ADSs) and increased our total ownership of WBD to approximately 98.6%.

On June 30, 2011, we elected to exercise our squeeze-out rights under Russian law with respect to all remaining WBD ordinary shares not already owned by us. Therefore, under Russian law, all remaining WBD shareholders were required to sell their ordinary shares (including those underlying ADSs) to us at the same price that was offered to WBD shareholders in the Russian tender offer. Accordingly, all registered holders of ordinary shares on August 15, 2011 (including the ADS depositary) received 3,883.70 Russian rubles per ordinary share. After completion of the squeeze-out in September 2011 (during our fourth quarter), we paid approximately $79 million for WBD’s ordinary shares (including shares underlying ADSs) and increased our total ownership to 100% of WBD.

On March 31, 2012 (during our second quarter), we completed a transaction with ~~Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp. (Tingyi).~~Tingyi. Under the terms of the agreement, we contributed our company-owned and joint venture bottling operations in China to Tingyi’s beverage subsidiary, Tingyi-Asahi Beverages Holding CoCo., Ltd (TAB), and received as consideration a 5% indirect equity interest in TAB. As a result of this transaction, TAB is now our franchise bottler in China. We also have a call option to increase our indirect holding in TAB to 20% by 2015. We ~~anticipate recording an~~recorded restructuring and other charges of $137 million ($163 million after-tax ~~loss~~or $0.10 per share), primarily consisting of ~~approximately $200 million associated with this transaction~~employee-related charges, in our second quarter results. This ~~loss will be~~charge is reflected in items affecting comparability ~~in our 2012 second quarter Form 10-Q~~ (see “Items Affecting Comparability” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations).


	3/24/12			12/31/11			6/16/12			12/31/11
*Amortizable intangible assets, net*
Acquired franchise rights	$	929		$	916		$	921		$	916
Reacquired franchise rights		110			110			111			110
Brands		1,440			1,417			1,408			1,417
Other identifiable intangibles		862			777			712			777

		3,341			3,220			3,152			3,220
Accumulated amortization		(1,381	)		(1,332	)		(1,343	)		(1,332	)

	$	1,960		$	1,888		$	1,809		$	1,888


	Balance 12/31/11		Acquisitions/ (Divestitures)			Translation and Other			Balance 6/16/12
*FLNA*
Goodwill	$	311	$	–		$	–		$	311
Brands		30		–			–			30

		341		–			–			341

*QFNA*
Goodwill		175		–			–			175

*LAF*
Goodwill		793		(162	)		(10	)		621
Brands		157		112			(14	)		255

		950		(50	)		(24	)		876

*PAB*
Goodwill		9,932		19			1			9,952
Reacquired franchise rights		7,342		(33	)		–			7,309
Acquired franchise rights		1,562		10			–			1,572
Brands		168		–			(1	)		167

		19,004		(4	)		–			19,000

*Europe*
Goodwill		4,900		78			(110	)		4,868
Reacquired franchise rights		732		–			(20	)		712
Acquired franchise rights		218		–			(9	)		209
Brands		4,178		(96	)		(76	)		4,006

		10,028		(18	)		(215	)		9,795

*AMEA*
Goodwill		689		(143	)		(17	)		529
Brands		170		(25	)		(6	)		139

		859		(168	)		(23	)		668


Total goodwill		16,800		(208	)		(136	)		16,456
Total reacquired franchise rights		8,074		(33	)		(20	)		8,021
Total acquired franchise rights		1,780		10			(9	)		1,781
Total brands		4,703		(9	)		(97	)		4,597

	$	31,357	$	(240	)	$	(262	)	$	30,855

For the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of ~~$50~~$69 million. For the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $119 million ($56125 million recorded as stock-based compensation expense, $1 million included in merger and integration charges and income of $7 million included in restructuring and impairment charges). For the 12 weeks ended ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of ~~$79~~$76 million ($7274 million recorded as stock-based compensation expense

and $2 million included in merger and integration charges). For the 24 weeks ended June 11, 2011, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $155 million ($146 million recorded as stock-based compensation expense and $7$9 million included in merger and integration charges).

In connection with our multi-year productivity plan (Productivity Plan) announced in February 2012, the Compensation Committee of PepsiCo’s Board of Directors elected to delay the grant of the annual equity award from ~~March~~the first quarter of 2012 to ~~April,~~the second quarter of 2012, in order to appropriately administer the award following employee headcount reductions. Therefore, for the 12 and 24 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we ~~did not issue any grants of~~granted 3.4 million stock options orand 4.2 million restricted stock units (RSU). at a weighted-average grant price of $66.50, under the terms of our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For the 12 weeks ended ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011, our grants of stock options and RSUs were nominal. For the 24 weeks ended June 11, 2011, we granted 6.4 million stock options and ~~5.1~~5.2 million RSUs at a weighted-average grant ~~price~~prices of ~~$63.75,~~$63.78 and $63.81, respectively, under the terms of our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Our weighted-average Black-Scholes fair value assumptions ~~in the prior year were~~are as follows:

As part of our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan, we granted a nominal amount of PepsiCo equity performance units (PEPUnits) to certain executive officers. These PEPUnits are earned based on achievement of a cumulative net income performance target and provide an opportunity to earn shares of PepsiCo Common Stock with a value that adjusts based upon absolute changes in PepsiCo’s stock price as well as PepsiCo’s Total Shareholder Return relative to the S&P 500 over a three-year performance period.

The components of net periodic benefit cost for pension and retiree medical plans are as follows:


	12 Weeks Ended																		12 Weeks Ended
	Pension												Retiree Medical						Pension												Retiree Medical
	3/24/12			3/19/11			3/24/12			3/19/11			3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
	U.S.						International												U.S.						International
Service cost	$	95		$	82		$	18		$	17		$	12		$	12		$	94		$	80		$	24		$	23		$	11		$	11
Interest cost		123			126			20			21			15			20			123			126			28			28			15			21
Expected return on plan assets		(184	)		(162	)		(26	)		(24	)		(5	)		(3	)		(183	)		(162	)		(35	)		(33	)		(5	)		(4	)
Amortization of prior service cost/(benefit)		4			3			–			–			(6	)		(7	)		4			4			1			1			(6	)		(6	)
Amortization of experience loss		60			33			10			7			–			3			59			34			12			9			–			3

		98			82			22			21			16			25			97			82			30			28			15			25
Curtailment gain		(7	)		(9	)		–			–			–			–
Settlement loss																				–			–			3			–			–			–

Total expense																			$	97		$	82		$	33		$	28		$	15		$	25


																			24 Weeks Ended
																			Pension												Retiree Medical
																			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
																			U.S.						International
Service cost																			$	189		$	162		$	42		$	40		$	23		$	23
Interest cost																				246			252			48			49			30			41
Expected return on plan assets																				(367	)		(324	)		(61	)		(57	)		(10	)		(7	)
Amortization of prior service cost/(benefit)																				8			7			1			1			(12	)		(13	)
Amortization of experience loss																				119			67			22			16			–			6

																				195			164			52			49			31			50
Settlement/Curtailment (gain)/loss																				(7	)		(9	)		3			–			–			–
Special termination benefits		4			10			–			–			4			1			4			10			–			–			4			1

Total expense	$	95		$	83		$	22		$	21		$	20		$	26		$	192		$	165		$	55		$	49		$	35		$	51

During the first quarter of 2012, we made discretionary contributions of $860 million to our pension plans and $140 million to our retiree medical plans.

A rollforward of our reserves for all federal, state and foreign tax jurisdictions is as follows:


	3/24/12			12/31/11			6/16/12			12/31/11
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,167		$	2,022		$	2,167		$	2,022
Additions for tax positions related to the current year		45			233			122			233
Additions for tax positions from prior years		5			147			21			147
Reductions for tax positions from prior years		(5	)		(46	)		(25	)		(46	)
Settlement payments		(4	)		(156	)		(10	)		(156	)
Statute of limitations expiration		–			(15	)		–			(15	)
Translation and other		(7	)		(18	)		(1	)		(18	)

Balance, end of period	$	2,201		$	2,167		$	2,274		$	2,167

The computations of basic and diluted net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share are as follows:


	12 Weeks Ended										12 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12					3/19/11					6/16/12					6/11/11
	Income			Shares^(a)		Income			Shares^(a)		Income			Shares^(a)		Income			Shares^(a)
Net income attributable to PepsiCo	$	1,127				$	1,143				$	1,488				$	1,885
Preferred shares:
Dividends		–					–					(1	)				(1	)
Redemption premium		(1	)				(2	)				(2	)				(1	)

Net income available for PepsiCo common shareholders	$	1,126			1,568	$	1,141			1,583	$	1,485			1,563	$	1,883			1,583

Basic net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share	$	0.72				$	0.72				$	0.95				$	1.19

Net income available for PepsiCo common shareholders	$	1,126			1,568	$	1,141			1,583	$	1,485			1,563	$	1,883			1,583
Dilutive securities:
Stock options and RSUs^(b)		–			15		–			21		–			17		–			21
ESOP convertible preferred stock		1			1		2			1		3			1		2			1

Diluted	$	1,127			1,584	$	1,143			1,605	$	1,488			1,581	$	1,885			1,605

Diluted net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share	$	0.71				$	0.71				$	0.94				$	1.17

The net proceeds from the issuances of the above notes were used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of commercial paper.

In the second quarter of 2012, we extended the termination date of our four-year unsecured revolving credit agreement (Four-Year Credit Agreement) from June 14, 2015 to June 14, 2016 and the termination date of our 364-day unsecured revolving credit agreement (364-Day Credit Agreement) from June 12, 2012 to June 11, 2013. Funds borrowed under the Four-Year Credit Agreement and the 364-Day Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes of PepsiCo and its subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, working capital, capital investments and acquisitions.

As of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we had ~~$1.2~~$3.3 billion of commercial paper outstanding.


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
	Total		2012		2013 – 2014		2015 – 2016		2017 and beyond		Total		2012		2013 – 2014		2015 – 2016		2017 and beyond
Long-term debt obligations^(b)	$	21,289	$	–	$	4,930	$	4,195	$	12,164	$	20,530	$	–	$	4,169	$	4,195	$	12,166
Interest on debt obligations^(c)		8,521		711		1,545		1,223		5,042		8,304		495		1,545		1,223		5,041
Operating leases		1,861		367		632		355		507		1,767		246		647		363		511
Purchasing commitments		3,123		1,113		1,525		422		63		3,033		873		1,682		418		60
Marketing commitments		2,461		200		570		526		1,165		2,410		131		595		535		1,149

	$	37,255	$	2,391	$	9,202	$	6,721	$	18,941	$	36,044	$	1,745	$	8,638	$	6,734	$	18,927

Most long-term contractual commitments, except for our long-term debt obligations, are not recorded on our balance sheet. Non-cancelable operating leases primarily represent building leases. Non-cancelable purchasing commitments are primarily for packaging materials, sugar and other sweeteners, oranges and orange juice. Non-cancelable marketing commitments are primarily for sports marketing. Bottler funding to independent bottlers is not reflected in our long-term contractual commitments as it is negotiated on an annual basis. Accrued liabilities for pension and retiree medical plans are not reflected in our long-term contractual commitments because they do not represent expected future cash outflows. SeePension and Retiree Medical Benefitsfor additional information regarding our pension and retiree medical obligations.

In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we incurred restructuring and impairment charges of ~~$33~~$77 million ($2357 million after-tax or ~~$0.01~~$0.04 per share) in conjunction with our Productivity Plan, including $8$24 million recorded in the FLNA segment, $5$1 million recorded in the QFNA segment, $6 million recorded in the LAF segment, $8$35 million recorded in the PAB segment, $9$8 million recorded in the AMEA segment and $3 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we incurred restructuring and impairment charges of $110 million ($80 million after-tax or $0.05 per share) in conjunction with our Productivity Plan, including $32 million recorded in the FLNA segment, $6 million recorded in the QFNA segment, $12 million recorded in the LAF segment, $43 million recorded in the PAB segment, $17 million recorded in the AMEA segment, $1 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses and income of $1 ~~million and $2~~ million recorded in the Europe segment ~~and in corporate unallocated expenses, respectively,~~ representing adjustments of previously recorded amounts. All of these net charges were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Substantially all cash payments related to these charges are expected to be paid by the end of 2012. The Productivity Plan includes actions in every aspect of our business that we believe will strengthen our complementary food, snack and beverage businesses by leveraging new technologies and processes across PepsiCo’s operations, go-to-market and information systems; heightening the focus on best practice sharing across the globe; consolidating manufacturing, warehouse and sales facilities; and implementing simplified organization structures, with wider spans of control and fewer layers of management. The Productivity Plan is expected to enhance PepsiCo’s cost-competitiveness, provide a source of funding for future brand-building and innovation initiatives, and serve as a financial cushion for potential macroeconomic uncertainty beyond 2012.


	Severance and Other Employee Costs			Asset Impairment			Other Costs			Total			Severance and Other Employee Costs			Asset Impairment			Other Costs			Total
Liability as of December 31, 2011	$	249		$	–		$	27		$	276		$	249		$	–		$	27		$	276
2012 restructuring and impairment charges		(2	)		17			18			33			40			26			44			110
Cash payments		(24	)		–			(20	)		(44	)		(102	)		–			(38	)		(140	)
Non-cash charges		–			(17	)		–			(17	)		(6	)		(26	)		(3	)		(35	)

Liability as of March 24, 2012	$	223		$	–		$	25		$	248
Liability as of June 16, 2012													$	181		$	–		$	30		$	211

In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we incurred merger and integration charges of $2$3 million ($2 million after-tax with a nominal amount per share) related to our acquisition of ~~WBD.~~WBD, including $1 million recorded in the Europe segment and $2 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we incurred merger and integration charges of $5 million ($4 million after-tax with a nominal amount per share) related to our acquisition of WBD, including $3 million recorded in the Europe segment and $2 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. These charges were recorded in selling, general and administrative ~~expenses in the Europe segment.~~expenses. Cash payments related to these charges are expected to be paid by the end of 2012.

and $12 million recorded in corporate unallocated ~~expenses~~expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 11, 2011, we incurred merger and ~~income~~integration charges of $8$113 million ($94 million after-tax or $0.06 per share) related to our acquisitions of PBG, PAS and WBD, including $53 million recorded in the PAB segment, $6 million recorded in the Europe segment ~~primarily reflecting a gain on our previously held equity interest~~and $54 million recorded in ~~WBD.~~corporate unallocated expenses. All of these net charges were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. These charges also include closing costs and advisory fees related to our acquisition of WBD. Substantially all cash payments related to these charges were paid by the end of 2011.


	Severance and Other Employee Costs			Other Costs			Total			Severance and Other Employee Costs			Other Costs			Total
Liability as of December 31, 2011	$	98		$	7		$	105		$	98		$	7		$	105
2012 merger and integration charges		2			–			2			3			2			5
Cash payments		(19	)		(1	)		(20	)		(43	)		(4	)		(47	)
Non-cash charges		4			(1	)		3			(5	)		–			(5	)

Liability as of March 24, 2012	$	85		$	5		$	90
Liability as of June 16, 2012										$	53		$	5		$	58

In the normal course of business, we manage these risks through a variety of strategies, including productivity initiatives, global purchasing programs and hedging strategies. Our hedging strategies include the use of derivatives. Certain derivatives are designated as either cash flow or fair value hedges and qualify for hedge accounting treatment, while others do not qualify and are marked to market through earnings. Cash flows from derivatives used to manage commodity, foreign exchange or interest risks are classified as operating activities. See “Our Business Risks” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further unaudited information on our business risks.

For cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss within common shareholders’ equity until the underlying hedged item is recognized in net income. For fair value hedges, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, consistent with the underlying hedged item. Hedging transactions are limited to an underlying exposure. As a result, any change in the value of our derivative instruments would be substantially offset by an opposite change in the value of the underlying hedged items. Hedging ineffectiveness and a net earnings impact occur when the change in the value of the hedge does not offset the change in the value of the underlying hedged item. If the derivative instrument is terminated, we continue to defer the related gain or loss and then include it as a component of the cost of the underlying hedged item. Upon determination that the underlying hedged item will not be part of an actual transaction, we recognize the related gain or loss in net income immediately.

We also use derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. We account for such derivatives at market value with the resulting gains and losses reflected in our income statement. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We perform assessments of our counterparty credit risk regularly, including a review of credit ratings, credit default swap rates and potential nonperformance of the counterparty. Based on our most recent assessment of our counterparty credit risk, we consider this risk to be low. In addition, we enter into derivative contracts with a variety of financial institutions that we believe are creditworthy in order to reduce our concentration of credit risk.

We are subject to commodity price risk because our ability to recover increased costs through higher pricing may be limited in the competitive environment in which we operate. This risk is managed through the use of fixed-price purchase orders, pricing agreements and derivatives. In addition, risk to our supplies of certain raw materials is mitigated through purchases from multiple geographies and suppliers. We use derivatives, with terms of no more than three years, to economically hedge price fluctuations related to a portion of our anticipated commodity purchases, primarily for metals, energy and agricultural products. For those derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, any ineffectiveness is recorded immediately in corporate unallocated expenses. Ineffectiveness is not material. We classify both the earnings and cash flow impact from these derivatives consistent with the underlying hedged item. During the next 12 months, we expect to

reclassify net losses of ~~$33~~$65 million related to these hedges from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net income. Derivatives used to hedge commodity price risk that do not qualify for hedge accounting are marked to market each period and reflected in our income statement.

Our open commodity derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting had a face value of ~~$552~~$538 million as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~$573~~$590 million as of ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011.

Our open commodity derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting had a face value of ~~$628~~$563 million as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~$300~~$356 million as of ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011.

Financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates for assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates for revenues and expenses. Adjustments resulting from translating net assets are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within common shareholders’ equity as currency translation adjustment.

We enter into derivatives, primarily forward contracts with terms of no more than two years, to manage our exposure to foreign currency transaction risk. Exchange rate gains or losses related to foreign currency transactions are recognized as transaction gains or losses in our income statement as incurred.

Our foreign currency derivatives had a total face value of ~~$2.7~~$2.6 billion as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and $2.3 billion as of ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011. During the next 12 months, we expect to reclassify net ~~losses~~gains of $9$27 million related to foreign currency contracts that qualify for hedge accounting from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net income. Additionally, ineffectiveness is not material. For foreign currency derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all losses and gains were offset by changes in the underlying hedged items, resulting in no net material impact on earnings.

We centrally manage our debt and investment portfolios considering investment opportunities and risks, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. We use various interest rate derivative instruments including, but not limited to, interest rate swaps, cross currency interest rate swaps, Treasury locks and swap locks to manage our overall interest expense and foreign exchange risk. These instruments effectively change the interest rate and currency of specific debt issuances. Certain of our fixed rate indebtedness has been swapped to floating rates. The notional amount, interest payment and maturity date of the interest rate and cross-currency swaps match the principal, interest payment and maturity date of the related debt. Our Treasury locks and swap locks are entered into to protect against unfavorable interest rate changes relating to forecasted debt transactions.

The notional amounts of the interest rate derivative instruments outstanding as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011 were ~~$8.33~~$7.3 billion and ~~$9.23~~$8.7 billion, respectively. We classify both the earnings and cash flow impact from these interest rate derivative instruments consistent with the underlying hedged item. For those interest rate derivative instruments that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, any ineffectiveness is recorded immediately. Ineffectiveness is not material. During the next 12 months, we expect to reclassify net losses of $23 million related to these hedges from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net income.

As of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, approximately ~~32%~~34% of total debt, after the impact of the related interest rate derivative instruments, was exposed to variable rates, compared to 38% as of December 31, 2011.

The fair values of our financial assets and liabilities as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011 are categorized as follows:


	2012				2011				2012				2011
	Assets^(a)		Liabilities^(a)		Assets^(a)		Liabilities^(a)		Assets^(a)		Liabilities^(a)		Assets^(a)		Liabilities^(a)
Available-for-sale securities^(b)	$	72	$	–	$	70	$	–	$	62	$	–	$	85	$	–
Short-term investments – index funds^(c)	$	166	$	–	$	177	$	–	$	158	$	–	$	176	$	–
Prepaid forward contracts⁽^d⁾	$	37	$	–	$	43	$	–
Deferred compensation⁽^e⁾	$	–	$	523	$	–	$	553
Prepaid forward contracts^(d)									$	40	$	–	$	41	$	–
Deferred compensation^(e)									$	–	$	501	$	–	$	547

Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:
Interest rate derivatives⁽^f⁾	$	274	$	2	$	293	$	4
Interest rate derivatives^(f)									$	289	$	–	$	345	$	–

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Forward exchange contracts^(g⁾	$	9	$	18	$	4	$	38
Interest rate derivatives^(f⁾		–		–		3		12
Commodity contracts⁽^h⁾		14		42		90		17
Foreign exchange contracts^(g)									$	41	$	14	$	7	$	36
Interest rate derivatives^(f)										–		–		–		14
Commodity contracts^(h)										–		79		74		13

	$	23	$	60	$	97	$	67	$	41	$	93	$	81	$	63

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Forward exchange contracts^(g⁾	$	30	$	9	$	6	$	11
Interest rate derivatives^(f⁾		95		128		14		52
Commodity contracts⁽^h⁾		39		30		59		1
Foreign exchange contracts^(g)									$	17	$	16	$	8	$	15
Interest rate derivatives^(f)										124		156		44		81
Commodity contracts^(h)										17		72		47		2

	$	164	$	167	$	79	$	64	$	158	$	244	$	99	$	98

Total derivatives at fair value	$	461	$	229	$	469	$	135	$	488	$	337	$	525	$	161

Total	$	736	$	752	$	759	$	688	$	748	$	838	$	827	$	708

The fair value of our debt obligations as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 was ~~$30~~$31 billion, based upon prices of similar instruments in the marketplace.

The effective portion of the pre-tax losses/(gains)~~/losses~~ on our derivative instruments are categorized in the tables below.


	12 Weeks Ended																		12 Weeks Ended
	Fair Value/Non- designated Hedges						Cash Flow Hedges												Fair Value/Non- designated Hedges						Cash Flow Hedges
	(Gains) /Losses Recognized in Income Statement^(a)						Losses/(Gains) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss						(Gains)/Losses Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income Statement^(b)						Losses/(Gains) Recognized in Income Statement^(a)						(Gains)/Losses Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss						Losses/(Gains) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income Statement^(b)
		3/24/12			3/19/11			3/24/12			3/19/11			3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12		6/11/11

Forward exchange contracts	$	(10	)	$	(1	)	$	29		$	25		$	(3	)	$	5
Foreign exchange contracts																			$	3		$	2		$	(33	)	$	12		$	5	$	16
Interest rate derivatives		27			(22	)		4			(6	)		4			3			(19	)		(56	)		–			35			5		3
Commodity contracts		(49	)		(39	)		(18	)		(40	)		11			(6	)		72			(7	)		55			(15	)		16		(19	)

Total	$	(32	)	$	(62	)	$	15		$	(21	)	$	12		$	2		$	56		$	(61	)	$	22		$	32		$	26	$	–

In the second quarter of 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law. The PPACA changes the tax treatment related to an existing retiree drug subsidy (RDS) available to sponsors of retiree health benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to the benefits under Medicare Part D. As a result of the PPACA, RDS payments will effectively become taxable in tax years beginning in 2013, by requiring the amount of the subsidy received to be offset against our deduction for health care expenses. The provisions of the PPACA required us to record the effect of this tax law change beginning in our second quarter of 2010, and consequently we recorded a one-time related tax charge of $41 million in the second quarter of 2010. In the first quarter of 2012, we began pre-paying funds within our 401(h) voluntary employee beneficiary associations (VEBA) trust to fully cover prescription drug benefit liabilities for Medicare eligible retirees. As a result, the receipt of future Medicare subsidy payments for prescription drugs will not be taxable and, consequently, we recorded a $55 million tax benefit reflecting this ~~change.~~change in the first quarter of 2012.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended its accounting guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in financial statements to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items that are recorded in other comprehensive income. The new accounting guidance requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB approved a deferral of the effective date of certain requirements related to the presentation and disclosure of reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income. The provisions of the retained guidance were effective as of the beginning of our 2012 fiscal year. Accordingly, we have presented the components of net income and other comprehensive income for the 12 and 24 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011 as two separate but consecutive statements. In June 2012, the FASB decided not to reinstate the previously deferred presentation and disclosure requirements for reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income. As an alternative, the FASB decided to issue a proposal that would require an entity to provide enhanced footnote disclosures to explain the effect of reclassification adjustments on other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity would be required to provide a tabular disclosure in the footnotes showing the effect of items reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income on the line items of net income. We will continue to monitor the FASB’s activities related to the ~~deferral of the presentation and disclosure of reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income.~~proposed guidance.

In September 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity would continue to perform the historical first step of the impairment test if it fails the qualitative assessment, while no further analysis would be required if it passes. The provisions of the new guidance are effective for our 2012 annual goodwill impairment test. ~~We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our financial statements.~~

In December 2011, the FASB issued new disclosure requirements that are intended to enhance current disclosures on offsetting financial assets and liabilities. The new disclosures require an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments eligible for offset on the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The provisions of the new disclosure requirements are effective as of the beginning of our 2014 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our financial statements.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Our discussion and analysis is an integral part of understanding our financial results. Also refer to Basis of Presentation and Our Divisions in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Tabular dollars are in millions, except per share amounts. All per share amounts reflect common per share amounts, assume dilution unless otherwise noted and are based on unrounded amounts. Percentage changes are based on unrounded amounts.

We offer sales incentives and discounts through various programs to customers and consumers. These incentives and discounts are accounted for as a reduction of revenue. A number of our sales incentives, such as bottler funding to independent bottlers and customer volume rebates, are based on annual targets, and accruals are established during the year for the expected payout. These accruals are based on contract terms and our historical experience with similar programs and require management judgment with respect to estimating customer participation and performance levels. Differences between estimated expense and actual incentive costs are normally insignificant and are recognized in earnings in the period such differences are determined. In addition, certain advertising and marketing costs are also based on annual targets and recognized during the year incurred.

For interim reporting, our policy is to allocate our forecasted full-year sales incentives for most of our programs to each of our interim reporting periods in the same year that benefits from the programs. The allocation methodology is based on our forecasted sales incentives for the full year and the proportion of each interim period’s actual gross revenue and volume, as applicable, to our forecasted annual gross revenue and volume, as applicable. Based on our review of the forecasts at each interim period, any changes in estimates and the related allocation of sales incentives are recognized in the interim period as they are identified. In addition, we apply a similar allocation methodology for interim reporting purposes for other marketplace spending, which includes the costs of advertising and other marketing activities.

In determining our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated annual effective tax rate which is based on our expected annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Subsequent recognition, derecognition and measurement of a tax position taken in a previous period are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements reflecting our views about our future performance that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act are generally identified through the

inclusion of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “will” and variations of such words and other similar expressions. All statements addressing our future operating performance, and statements addressing events and developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available information, operating plans and projections about future events and trends. They inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in any such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Our operations outside of the ~~United States~~U.S. generated approximately ~~40%~~45% of our net revenue in the 1224 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency risks, including unforeseen economic changes and political unrest. During 2011 and 2012, the economic environment in Europe ~~deteriorated~~continued to deteriorate and certain countries experienced debt and credit issues as well as currency fluctuations. We are identifying actions to potentially mitigate the unfavorable impact, if any, on our 2012 results. During the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, unfavorable foreign currency decreased net revenue growth by 1over 3 percentage ~~point,~~points, primarily due to depreciation of the Mexican peso, ~~and~~Russian ruble, euro, Indian rupee ~~partially offset~~and Brazilian real. During the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, unfavorable foreign currency decreased net revenue growth by ~~appreciation~~2.5 percentage points, primarily due to depreciation of the ~~Chinese yuan.~~Mexican peso, Russian ruble, euro, Indian rupee and Brazilian real. Currency declines against the U.S. dollar which are not offset could adversely impact our future results.

We expect to be able to reduce the impact of volatility in our raw material and energy costs through our hedging strategies and ongoing sourcing initiatives.

SeeFinancial Instrumentsin the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our derivative instruments, including their fair values as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011. Cautionary statements included in Item 1A. Risk Factors and in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Our Business Risks, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, should be considered when evaluating our trends and future results.

Our reported financial results are impacted by the following items in each of the following periods:


	12 Weeks Ended						12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
*Operating profit*
Mark-to-market net gains	$	84		$	31
Mark-to-market net (losses)/gains							$	(79	)	$	(9	)	$	5		$	22
Restructuring and impairment charges	$	(33	)	$	–		$	(77	)	$	–		$	(110	)	$	–
Merger and integration charges	$	(2	)	$	(55	)	$	(3	)	$	(58	)	$	(5	)	$	(113	)
Inventory fair value adjustments	$	–		$	(34	)	$	–		$	(4	)	$	–		$	(38	)
Restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi							$	(137	)	$	–		$	(137	)	$	–
*Net income attributable to PepsiCo*
Mark-to-market net gains	$	60		$	19
Mark-to-market net (losses)/gains							$	(55	)	$	(5	)	$	5		$	14
Restructuring and impairment charges	$	(23	)	$	–		$	(57	)	$	–		$	(80	)	$	–
Merger and integration charges	$	(2	)	$	(49	)	$	(2	)	$	(45	)	$	(4	)	$	(94	)
Inventory fair value adjustments	$	–		$	(21	)	$	–		$	(2	)	$	–		$	(23	)
Restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi							$	(163	)	$	–		$	(163	)	$	–
*Net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share–diluted*
Mark-to-market net gains	$	0.04		$	0.01
Mark-to-market net (losses)/gains							$	(0.04	)	$	(–	)	$	–		$	0.01
Restructuring and impairment charges	$	(0.01	)	$	–		$	(0.04	)	$	–		$	(0.05	)	$	–
Merger and integration charges	$	(–	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(–	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(–	)	$	(0.06	)
Inventory fair value adjustments	$	–		$	(0.01	)	$	–		$	(–	)	$	–		$	(0.01	)
Restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi							$	(0.10	)	$	–		$	(0.10	)	$	–

We centrally manage commodity derivatives on behalf of our divisions. These commodity derivatives include metals, energy and agricultural products. Certain of these commodity derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are marked to market with the resulting gains and losses recognized in corporate unallocated expenses. These gains and losses are subsequently reflected in division results when the divisions take delivery of the underlying commodity. Therefore, the divisions realize the economic effects of the derivative without experiencing any resulting mark-to-market volatility, which remains in corporate unallocated expenses.

~~For~~In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we recognized ~~$84~~$79 million ($6055 million after-tax or $0.04 per share) of mark-to-market net losses on commodity hedges in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we recognized $5 million ($5 million after-tax with a nominal amount per share) of mark-to-market net gains on commodity hedges in corporate unallocated expenses.

In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011, we recognized ~~$31~~$9 million ($195 million after-tax with a nominal amount per share) of mark-to-market net losses on commodity hedges in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 11, 2011, we recognized $22 million ($14 million after-tax or $0.01 per share) of mark-to-market net gains on commodity hedges in corporate unallocated expenses.

~~For~~In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we incurred restructuring and impairment charges of ~~$33~~$77 million ($2357 million after-tax or ~~$0.01~~$0.04 per share) in conjunction with our ~~multi-year~~ Productivity Plan, including $8$24 million recorded in the FLNA segment, $5$1 million recorded in the QFNA segment,

$6 $6 million recorded in the LAF segment, $8$35 million recorded in the PAB segment, $9$8 million recorded in the AMEA segment and $3 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we incurred restructuring and impairment charges of $110 million ($80 million after-tax or $0.05 per share) in conjunction with our Productivity Plan, including $32 million recorded in the FLNA segment, $6 million recorded in the QFNA segment, $12 million recorded in the LAF segment, $43 million recorded in the PAB segment, $17 million recorded in the AMEA segment, $1 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses and income of $1 ~~million and $2~~ million recorded in the Europe segment ~~and in corporate unallocated expenses, respectively,~~ representing adjustments of previously recorded amounts. The Productivity Plan includes actions in every aspect of our business that we believe will strengthen our complementary food, snack and beverage businesses by leveraging new technologies and processes across PepsiCo’s operations, go-to-market and information systems; heightening the focus on best practice sharing across the globe; consolidating manufacturing, warehouse and sales facilities; and implementing simplified organization structures, with wider spans of control and fewer layers of management. The Productivity Plan is expected to enhance PepsiCo’s cost-competitiveness, provide a source of funding for future brand-building and innovation initiatives, and serve as a financial cushion for potential macroeconomic uncertainty beyond 2012. As a result, we expect to incur pre-tax charges of approximately $910 million, $383 million of which was reflected in our 2011 results, ~~approximately $425~~$110 million of which ~~will be~~was reflected in our results through the second quarter of 2012, ~~results~~ and we anticipate approximately $315 million of additional charges during the remainder of 2012, with the balance of ~~which will~~approximately $102 million to be reflected in our 2013, 2014 and 2015 results. These charges will ~~be comprised~~consist of approximately $500 million of severance and other employee-related costs; approximately $325 million for other costs, including consulting-related costs and the termination of leases and other contracts; and approximately $85 million for asset impairments (all non-cash) resulting from plant closures and related actions. These charges resulted in cash expenditures of $30 million in 2011 and cash expenditures of ~~$44~~$140 million inthrough the ~~first~~second quarter of 2012, and we anticipate approximately ~~$506~~$295 million of additional related cash expenditures during the remainder of 2012, with the balance of approximately ~~$175~~$290 million of related cash expenditures expected in 2013 through 2015. We expect that the Productivity Plan will be substantially completed by the end of 2012 with incremental productivity initiatives continuing through the end of 2015.

In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we incurred merger and integration charges of $2$3 million ($2 million after-tax with a nominal amount per share) related to our acquisition of WBD, ~~and~~including $1 million recorded in the Europe ~~segment.~~segment and $2 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we incurred merger and integration charges of $5 million ($4 million after-tax with a nominal amount per share) related to our acquisition of WBD, including $3 million recorded in the Europe segment and $2 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses.

In the 12 weeks ended ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011, we incurred merger and integration charges of ~~$55~~$58 million ($4945 million after-tax or $0.03 per share) related to our acquisitions of PBG, PAS and WBD, including ~~$21~~$32 million recorded in the PAB segment, ~~$42 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses and income of $8~~$14 million recorded in the Europe segment ~~primarily reflecting a gain on~~and $12 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. In the 24 weeks ended June 11, 2011,

we incurred merger and integration charges of $113 million ($94 million after-tax or $0.06 per share) related to our ~~previously held equity interest~~acquisitions of PBG, PAS and WBD, including $53 million recorded in ~~WBD.~~the PAB segment, $6 million recorded in the Europe segment and $54 million recorded in corporate unallocated expenses. These charges also include closing costs and advisory fees related to our acquisition of WBD.

In the 12 and 24 weeks ended ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011, we recorded ~~$34~~$4 million ($212 million after-tax with a nominal impact per share) and $38 million ($23 million after-tax or $0.01 per share), respectively, of incremental costs in cost of sales related to fair value adjustments to the acquired inventory included in WBD’s balance sheet at the acquisition date and ~~other related~~ hedging contracts included in PBG’s and PAS’s balance sheets at the acquisition date.

In the 12 and 24 weeks ended June 16, 2012, we recorded restructuring and other charges of $137 million ($163 million after-tax or $0.10 per share) related to the transaction with Tingyi.

Certain measures contained in this Form 10-Q are financial measures that are adjusted for items affecting comparability (see “Items Affecting Comparability” for a detailed list and description of each of these items), as well as, in certain instances, adjusted for foreign currency. These

measures are not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Items adjusted for currency assume foreign currency exchange rates used for translation based on the rates in effect for the comparable prior-year period. In order to compute our constant currency results, we multiply or divide, as appropriate, our current year U.S. dollar results by the current year average foreign exchange rates and then multiply or divide, as appropriate, those amounts by the prior year average foreign exchange rates. We believe investors should consider these non-GAAP measures in evaluating our results as they are more indicative of our ongoing performance and with how management evaluates our operational results and trends. These measures are not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for U.S. GAAP reporting measures. See also “Organic Net Revenue Growth” and “Management Operating Cash Flow.”

Since our divisions each use different measures of physical unit volume, a common servings metric is necessary to reflect our consolidated physical unit volume. For the 12 weeks and 24 weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, total servings increased 2%~~. For the 12 weeks ended March 19, 2011, total servings increased 9%~~. 2012 servings growth reflects an adjustment to the base year (2011) for divestitures that occurred in 2011 and 2012, as applicable.

We discuss volume for our beverage businesses on a bottler case sales (BCS) basis in which all beverage volume is converted to an 8-ounce-case metric. Most of our beverage volume is sold by our company-owned and franchise-owned bottlers, and that portion is based on our bottlers’ sales to retailers and independent distributors. The remainder of our volume is based on our direct shipments to retailers and independent distributors. We report our international beverage volume on a monthly basis. Our ~~first~~second quarter includes beverage volume outside of North America for ~~January~~March, April and ~~February.~~May. Concentrate shipments and equivalents (CSE) represent our physical beverage volume shipments to independent bottlers, retailers and independent distributors, and is the measure upon which our revenue is based.


	12 Weeks Ended									12 Weeks Ended									24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			Change			6/16/12			6/11/11			Change			6/16/12			6/11/11			Change
Total net revenue	$	12,428		$	11,937			4	%	$	16,458		$	16,827			(2	)%	$	28,886		$	28,764			–	%

Operating profit
FLNA	$	780		$	774			1	%	$	835		$	853			(2	)%	$	1,615		$	1,627			(1	)%
QFNA		187			214			(12	)%		154			167			(8	)%		341			381			(11	)%
LAF		183			171			7	%		271			274			(1	)%		454			445			2	%
PAB		525			558			(6	)%		840			983			(15	)%		1,365			1,541			(11	)%
Europe		81			63			29	%		453			407			11	%		534			470			14	%
AMEA		148			146			2	%		165			299			(45	)%		313			445			(29	)%
Corporate Unallocated
Mark-to-market net gains		84			31			175	%
Mark-to-market net (losses)/gains											(79	)		(9	)		802	%		5			22			(78	)%
Restructuring and impairment charges		2			–			n/m			(3	)		–			n/m			(1	)		–			n/m
Merger and integration charges		–			(42	)		n/m			(2	)		(12	)		(96	)%		(2	)		(54	)		(99	)%
Other		(268	)		(189	)		42	%		(257	)		(208	)		23	%		(525	)		(397	)		32	%

Total operating profit	$	1,722		$	1,726			–	%	$	2,377		$	2,754			(14	)%	$	4,099		$	4,480			(9	)%

Total operating profit margin		13.9	%		14.5	%		(0.6	)		14.4	%		16.4	%		(2.0	)		14.2	%		15.6	%		(1.4	)

See “Results of Operations – Division Review” for a tabular presentation and discussion of key drivers of net revenue.

On a reported basis, total operating profit ~~was flat~~decreased 14% and operating margin decreased ~~0.6~~2 percentage points. Operating profit performance was primarily driven by higher commodity costs, partially offset by ~~the~~effective net ~~revenue growth.~~pricing. Commodity cost inflation was approximately ~~$300~~$350 million compared to the prior year period, primarily attributable to PAB and FLNA. Items affecting comparability (see “Items Affecting Comparability”) ~~positively contributed 6 percentage points to~~reduced total operating profit ~~performance and 0.9~~growth by 8 percentage points toand total operating ~~margin.~~margin by 1.4 percentage points.

On a reported basis, total operating profit decreased 9% and operating margin decreased 1.4 percentage points. Operating profit performance was primarily driven by higher commodity costs, partially offset by effective net pricing. Commodity cost inflation was approximately $700 million compared to the prior year period, primarily attributable to PAB and FLNA. Items affecting comparability (see “Items Affecting Comparability”) reduced total operating profit growth by 3 percentage points and total operating margin by 0.4 percentage points.


	12 Weeks Ended									12 Weeks Ended									24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			Change			6/16/12			6/11/11			Change			6/16/12			6/11/11			Change

Interest expense, net	$	(175	)	$	(163	)	$	(12	)	$	(208	)	$	(179	)		16	%	$	(383	)	$	(342	)		12	%

Tax rate		26.7	%		26.8	%					30.8	%		26.0	%					29.1	%		26.3	%

Net income attributable to PepsiCo	$	1,127		$	1,143			(1	)%	$	1,488		$	1,885			(21	)%	$	2,615		$	3,028			(14	)%
Net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share – diluted	$	0.71		$	0.71			–	%	$	0.94		$	1.17			(20	)%	$	1.65		$	1.89			(12	)%
Mark-to-market net gains		(0.04	)		(0.01	)
Mark-to-market net losses/(gains)											0.04			–						–			(0.01	)
Restructuring and impairment charges		0.01			–						0.04			–						0.05			–
Merger and integration charges		–			0.03						–			0.03						–			0.06
Inventory fair value adjustments		–			0.01						–			–						–			0.01
Restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi											0.10			–						0.10			–

Net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share – diluted, excluding above items*	$	0.69	**	$	0.74			(7	)%	$	1.12		$	1.21	**		(7	)%	$	1.81	**	$	1.95			(7	)%

Net interest expense increased ~~$12 million,~~16%, primarily reflecting ~~higher~~lower average ~~debt balances and higher~~ rates on ~~international borrowings, partially offset by gains~~our investment balances, losses in the market value of investments used to economically hedge a portion of our deferred compensation ~~costs.~~costs and higher average rates on our debt balances.

The reported tax rate ~~decreased 0.1%~~increased 4.8% compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting ~~current~~the tax impact of the transaction with Tingyi and lapping of the prior year ~~planning initiatives, including the pre-payment~~tax benefits related to a portion of ~~Medicare subsidy liabilities,~~our international bottling operations, partially offset by ~~income mix shift and~~ the favorable resolution of certain tax matters in ~~2011.~~the current year.

Net income attributable to PepsiCo decreased 1%21% and net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share ~~was flat.~~decreased 20%. Items affecting comparability (see “Items Affecting Comparability”) ~~increased~~decreased both net income attributable to PepsiCo and net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share by 712 percentage points.

Net interest expense increased 12%, primarily reflecting higher average rates on our debt balances, lower average rates on our investment balances and higher average debt balances.

The reported tax rate increased 2.8% compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting the tax impact of the transaction with Tingyi and lapping of the prior year tax benefits related to a portion of our international bottling operations, partially offset by the pre-payment of Medicare subsidy liabilities.

Net income attributable to PepsiCo decreased 14% and net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share decreased 12%. Items affecting comparability (see “Items Affecting Comparability”) decreased both net income attributable to PepsiCo and net income attributable to PepsiCo per common share by 5 percentage points.

The results and discussions below are based on how our Chief Executive Officer monitors the performance of our divisions. Accordingly, 2012 volume growth measures reflect an adjustment to the base year (2011) for divestitures that occurred in ~~2011.~~2011 and 2012. See “Items Affecting Comparability” for a discussion of items to consider when evaluating our results and related information regarding non-GAAP measures.

Furthermore, in the discussions of net revenue and operating profit below, “effective net pricing” reflects the year-over-year impact of discrete pricing actions, sales incentive activities and mix resulting from selling varying products in different package sizes and in different countries, and “net pricing” reflects the year-over-year combined impact of list price changes, weight changes per package, discounts and allowances. Additionally, “acquisitions and ~~divestitures”,~~divestitures,” except as otherwise noted, reflect all mergers and acquisitions activity, including the impact of acquisitions, divestitures and changes in ownership or control in consolidated subsidiaries and nonconsolidated equity investees.


Net Revenue
12 Weeks Ended	FLNA			QFNA			LAF			PAB			Europe			AMEA			Total			FLNA			QFNA			LAF			PAB			Europe			AMEA			Total
March 24, 2012	$	3,010		$	623		$	1,235		$	4,448		$	1,845		$	1,267		$	12,428
March 19, 2011	$	2,904		$	640		$	1,108		$	4,531		$	1,626		$	1,128		$	11,937
June 16, 2012																						$	3,193		$	583		$	1,948		$	5,352		$	3,617		$	1,765		$	16,458
June 11, 2011																						$	3,090		$	583		$	1,808		$	5,629		$	3,794		$	1,923		$	16,827
% Impact of:
Volume^(a)		(2	)%		(5	)%		4.5	%		(2	)%		(0.5	)%		5	%		(1	)%		–	%		(1	)%		3	%		(1	)%		(2	)%		9	%		1	%
Effective net pricing^(b)		6			3			11			4			5			7			5.5			4			2			11			3.5			4			1			4
Foreign exchange		–			–			(6	)		–			(4	)		–			(1	)		–			(1	)		(9	)		(0.5	)		(8	)		(4	)		(3	)
Acquisitions and divestitures		–			–			1			(3	)		13			–			1			–			–			3			(7	)		–			(15	)		(4	)

% Change^(c)		4	%		(3	)%		11	%		(2	)%		13	%		12	%		4	%		3	%		–	%		8	%		(5	)%		(5	)%		(8	)%		(2	)%


Net Revenue
24 Weeks Ended																						FLNA			QFNA			LAF			PAB			Europe			AMEA			Total
June 16, 2012																						$	6,203		$	1,206		$	3,183		$	9,800		$	5,462		$	3,032		$	28,886
June 11, 2011																						$	5,994		$	1,223		$	2,916		$	10,160		$	5,420		$	3,051		$	28,764
% Impact of:
Volume^(a)																							(1	)%		(3	)%		4	%		(2	)%		(1	)%		7	%		–	%
Effective net pricing^(b)																							5			2			11			4			5			4			5
Foreign exchange																							–			–			(8	)		–			(7	)		(2	)		(2.5	)
Acquisitions and divestitures																							–			–			2			(5	)		4			(9	)		(2	)

% Change^(c)																							3.5	%		(1	)%		9	%		(3.5	)%		1	%		(1	)%		–	%

Organic net revenue growth is a significant measure we use to monitor net revenue performance. However, it is not a measure provided by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Therefore, this measure is not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for U.S. GAAP net revenue growth. In order to compute our organic net revenue growth results, we exclude the impact of acquisitions and divestitures and foreign exchange from reported net revenue growth. See also “Non-GAAP Measures.”

Net revenue increased 4% and pound volume declined 2%. The volume decline primarily reflects high-single-digit declines in trademark Lay’s and dips, partially offset by double-digit growth in variety packs. Volume performance was negatively impacted by approximately 2 percentage points due to the extra week of results in 2011, which caused the key pre-New Year’s holiday week to be included in the fourth quarter of 2011 rather than in the first quarter of 2012. Net revenue growth was driven by effective net pricing, which more than offset the volume declines.

Operating profit grew 1%, reflecting the net revenue growth, partially offset by higher commodity costs, primarily cooking oil. Restructuring and impairment charges reduced operating profit growth by 1 percentage point.


	12 Weeks Ended				%			12 Weeks Ended				%			24 Weeks Ended				%
	3/24/12		3/19/11		Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change
Net revenue	$	623	$	640		(3	)	$	3,193	$	3,090		3		$	6,203	$	5,994		3.5

Impact of foreign currency translation						–							–							–

Net revenue growth, on a constant currency basis*						(2	)**						4	**						4	**

Operating profit	$	187	$	214		(12	)	$	835	$	853		(2	)	$	1,615	$	1,627		(1	)
Restructuring and impairment charges		5		–					24		–					32		–

Operating profit excluding above item	$	192	$	214		(10	)
Operating profit excluding above item*								$	859	$	853		1		$	1,647	$	1,627		1

Impact of foreign currency translation						–							–							–

Operating profit growth excluding above item, on a constant currency basis*						(10	)						1							1

Net revenue ~~declined~~increased 3% and pound volume increased slightly. The volume performance reflects a mid-single-digit increase in trademark Doritos offset by double-digit declines in trademark SunChips and Rold Gold. Net revenue growth was driven by effective net pricing.

Operating profit declined 2%, reflecting higher commodity costs, primarily cooking oil, and higher advertising and marketing expenses. Restructuring and impairment charges negatively impacted operating profit performance by nearly 3 percentage points.

Net revenue increased 3.5% and pound volume declined 5%1%. The volume decline primarily reflects ~~high single-digit declines~~a mid-single-digit decline in ~~Oatmeal~~trademark Lay’s and ~~ready-to-eat cereals and~~a double-digit ~~declines~~decline in ~~Chewy granola bars,~~trademark Rold Gold, partially offset by ~~a mid-single-digit increase~~high-single-digit growth in ~~grits.~~variety packs. Net revenue ~~performance benefited from positive~~growth was driven by effective net ~~pricing.~~pricing, partially offset by the volume decline.

Operating profit declined ~~12%~~1%, reflecting higher commodity ~~costs. Additionally,~~costs, primarily cooking oil, and higher advertising and marketing expenses, partially offset by the ~~benefit from a change in accounting methodology for inventory recorded in the prior year contributed 7 percentage points to the operating profit decline.~~net revenue growth. Restructuring and impairment charges negatively impacted operating profit performance by 2 percentage points.

Volume grew 15%, primarily reflecting acquisitions in Brazil and Argentina in the fourth quarter of 2011, which contributed 10 percentage points to the volume growth. Additionally, Mexico grew at a mid-single-digit rate and Brazil grew at a low-single-digit rate (excluding the impact of the acquisition).

Net revenue increased 11%, primarily reflecting favorable effective net pricing and the volume growth. Unfavorable foreign currency reduced net revenue growth by 6 percentage points. Acquisitions and divestitures contributed over 1 percentage point to the net revenue growth.

Operating profit increased 7%, primarily reflecting the net revenue growth, partially offset by higher commodity costs. Unfavorable foreign currency reduced operating profit growth by 8 percentage points and acquisitions and divestitures reduced operating profit growth by 5 percentage points. Restructuring and impairment charges reduced operating profit growth by 3 percentage points.


	12 Weeks Ended				%			12 Weeks Ended				%			24 Weeks Ended				%
	3/24/12		3/19/11		Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change
Net revenue	$	4,448	$	4,531		(2	)	$	583	$	583		–		$	1,206	$	1,223		(1	)

Impact of foreign currency translation						–							1							–

Net revenue growth, on a constant currency basis*						(2	)						0.5	**						(1	)

Operating profit	$	525	$	558		(6	)	$	154	$	167		(8	)	$	341	$	381		(11	)
Restructuring and impairment charges		8		–					1		–					6		–
Merger and integration charges		–		21
Inventory fair value adjustments		–		9

Operating profit excluding above items*	$	533	$	588		(9	)
Operating profit excluding above item*								$	155	$	167		(8	)	$	347	$	381		(9	)

Impact of foreign currency translation						1							0.5							–

Operating profit growth excluding above items, on a constant currency basis*						(9	)**
Operating profit growth excluding above item, on a constant currency basis*													(7	)**						(9	)

Net revenue was flat and volume declined 1%. The volume decline primarily reflects high-single-digit declines in granola bars and low-single-digit declines in ready-to-eat cereals, partially offset by the introduction of Soft Baked Cookies and low-single-digit growth in Oatmeal. Net revenue performance benefited from favorable mix. Unfavorable foreign currency decreased net revenue performance by nearly 1 percentage point.

Operating profit declined 8%, primarily reflecting higher commodity costs as well as the impact of less-favorable settlements of promotional spending accruals in the current year, which negatively impacted operating profit performance by 3 percentage points. Restructuring charges negatively impacted operating profit performance by 1 percentage point.

Net revenue declined 1% and volume declined 3%. The volume decline primarily reflects double-digit declines in Chewy granola bars and mid-single-digit declines in Oatmeal and ready-to-eat cereals, partially offset by the introduction of Soft Baked Cookies. Net revenue performance benefited from positive net pricing.

Operating profit declined 11%, primarily reflecting higher commodity costs. Additionally, the benefit from a change in accounting methodology for inventory recorded in the prior year contributed 4 percentage points to the operating profit decline. Restructuring charges negatively impacted operating profit performance by 1.5 percentage points.

Net revenue increased 8%, primarily reflecting favorable effective net pricing and volume growth. Volume grew 15%, primarily reflecting acquisitions in Brazil and Argentina in the fourth quarter of 2011, which contributed 11 percentage points to the volume growth. Additionally, Mexico grew at a mid-single-digit rate, partially offset by a mid-single-digit decline in Brazil (excluding the impact of the acquisition). Unfavorable foreign currency reduced net revenue growth by 9 percentage points. Acquisitions and divestitures contributed 3 percentage points to the net revenue growth.

Operating profit decreased 1%, primarily reflecting higher commodity costs and increased advertising and marketing expenses. Unfavorable foreign currency negatively impacted operating profit performance by 10 percentage points and acquisitions and divestitures positively contributed nearly 1 percentage point to operating profit performance. Restructuring and impairment charges negatively impacted operating profit performance by 2.5 percentage points.

Net revenue increased 9%, primarily reflecting favorable effective net pricing and volume growth. Volume grew 15%, primarily reflecting acquisitions in Brazil and Argentina in the fourth quarter of 2011, which contributed 11 percentage points to the volume growth. Additionally, Mexico grew at a mid-single-digit rate, partially offset by a mid-single-digit decline in Brazil (excluding the impact of the acquisition). Unfavorable foreign currency reduced net revenue growth by 8 percentage points. Acquisitions and divestitures contributed over 2 percentage points to the net revenue growth.

Operating profit increased 2%, primarily reflecting the net revenue growth, partially offset by higher commodity costs. Unfavorable foreign currency reduced operating profit growth by 9 percentage points and acquisitions and divestitures reduced operating profit growth by over 1 percentage point. Restructuring and impairment charges reduced operating profit growth by 3 percentage points.

Net revenue decreased 5%, primarily reflecting the divestiture of our Mexico beverage business in the fourth quarter of 2011, which contributed 7 percentage points to the net revenue decline. Additionally, volume declines were more than offset by favorable effective net pricing. Volume decreased 1%, primarily reflecting North America volume declines of ~~2.5%~~2%, partially offset by a 2% increase in Latin America volume. North America volume declines were driven by a 4% decline in CSD volume, partially offset by a 1% increase in non-carbonated beverage volume. The non-carbonated beverage volume growth primarily reflected a mid-single-digit increase in Gatorade sports drinks, partially offset by a double-digit decline in Tropicana brands. Latin America volume growth primarily reflected a mid-single-digit increase in Mexico and a high-single-digit increase in

Brazil, partially offset by low-single-digit declines in Venezuela and Honduras.

Reported operating profit decreased 15%, primarily reflecting higher commodity costs and increased advertising and marketing expenses, partially offset by favorable effective net pricing. Excluding the items affecting comparability in the above table (see “Items Affecting Comparability”), operating profit decreased 14%. The divestiture of our Mexico beverage business contributed 2 percentage points to the reported operating profit decline.

Net revenue decreased 3.5%, primarily reflecting the divestiture of our Mexico beverage business in the fourth quarter of 2011, which contributed over 5 percentage points to the net revenue decline. Additionally, volume declines were more than offset by favorable effective net pricing. Volume decreased 1%, primarily reflecting North America volume declines of 2%, partially offset by a 3% increase in Latin America volume. North America volume declines were driven by a 4% decline in CSD volume, while non-carbonated beverage volume was unchanged. Latin America volume growth primarily reflected ~~a double-digit increase~~mid-single-digit increases in Mexico and ~~a high-single-digit increase in Argentina,~~Brazil, partially offset by a double-digit decline in Venezuela.

~~Net revenue~~Reported operating profit decreased 2%11%, primarily reflecting ~~the divestiture of our Mexico beverage business in the fourth quarter of 2011, which contributed 4 percentage points to the net revenue decline. Additionally, volume declines were more than~~higher commodity costs and increased advertising and marketing expenses, partially offset by favorable effective net pricing.

~~Reported operating profit decreased 6%, primarily reflecting higher commodity costs, partially offset by favorable effective net pricing and lower general and administrative costs.~~ Excluding the items affecting comparability in the above table (see “Items Affecting Comparability”), operating profit decreased 9%12%. The divestiture of our Mexico beverage business ~~increased~~contributed 1 percentage point to the reported operating profit ~~by nearly 1 percentage point.~~decline.


	12 Weeks Ended						%			12 Weeks Ended				%			24 Weeks Ended					%
	3/24/12			3/19/11			Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change			6/16/12			6/11/11		Change
Net revenue	$	1,845		$	1,626			13		$	3,617	$	3,794		(5	)	$	5,462		$	5,420		1

Impact of foreign currency translation								4							8								7

Net revenue growth, on a constant currency basis*								18	**						3								7	**

Operating profit	$	81		$	63			29		$	453	$	407		11		$	534		$	470		14
Restructuring and impairment charges		(1	)		–						–		–					(1	)		–
Merger and integration charges		2			(8	)					1		14					3			6
Inventory fair value adjustments		–			25						–		–					–			25

Operating profit excluding above items*	$	82		$	80			2.5		$	454	$	421		8		$	536		$	501		7

Impact of foreign currency translation								2							7								7

Operating profit growth excluding above items, on a constant currency basis*								4	**						15								14

Net revenue decreased 5%, primarily reflecting unfavorable foreign currency, which reduced net revenue growth by 8 percentage points, partially offset by favorable effective net pricing.

Snacks volume grew ~~17%~~1%, ~~primarily~~ reflecting ~~our acquisition of WBD, which contributed 15 percentage points to volume~~double-digit growth ~~and grew at a high-single-digit rate for the comparable post-acquisition period~~ in ~~February. Mid-single-digit increases in the United Kingdom and South Africa were~~Russia (ex-WBD), partially offset by a low-single-digit decline at WBD and mid-single-digit declines in Turkey and the Netherlands. Additionally, the United Kingdom decreased slightly.

Beverage volume ~~increased 10%~~decreased by 2%, ~~primarily~~ reflecting ~~our acquisition of WBD, which contributed 11 percentage points to volume growth and grew at~~broad-based declines driven by a ~~high-single-digit rate for the comparable post-acquisition period~~double-digit decline in ~~February. A double-digit decrease in Russia (ex-WBD)~~Poland and a high-single-digit ~~decrease~~decline in ~~Turkey were~~Germany, partially offset by ~~a double-digit increase~~low-single-digit growth in Russia (ex-WBD), Turkey and at WBD. Additionally, the United Kingdom ~~and a mid-single-digit increase in Germany.~~

~~Net revenue grew 13%, primarily reflecting our acquisition of WBD and favorable effective net pricing. Unfavorable foreign currency reduced net revenue growth by 4 percentage points.~~increased slightly.

Reported operating profit increased ~~29%~~11%, primarily reflecting favorable effective net pricing and the ~~net revenue growth and lower~~timing of advertising and marketing expenses, partially offset by higher commodity costs. Excluding the items affecting comparability in the above table (see “Items Affecting Comparability”), operating profit increased ~~2.5%~~8%. ~~Operating profit performance was negatively impacted by unfavorable~~A benefit in the prior year from the accelerated timing of concentrate shipments in connection with our global SAP implementation and the impact of less-favorable settlements of promotional spending accruals in the current year ~~compared to the prior year, which decreased~~negatively impacted reported operating profit growth by ~~15 percentage points. Acquisitions contributed 7~~4 percentage points ~~to operating profit growth, partially offset by unfavorable~~and 2 percentage points, respectively. Unfavorable foreign currency ~~which~~ reduced operating profit growth by 27 percentage points.

Net revenue grew 1%, primarily reflecting favorable effective net pricing, as well as our acquisition of WBD, which contributed 4 percentage points to the net revenue growth. Unfavorable foreign currency reduced net revenue growth by 7 percentage points.

Snacks volume grew 6%, primarily reflecting our acquisition of WBD, which contributed 5 percentage points to volume growth and grew at a low-single-digit rate for the comparable post-acquisition period. Double-digit growth in Russia (ex-WBD) was partially offset by low-single-digit declines in Turkey and the Netherlands. Additionally, the United Kingdom experienced low-single-digit growth.

Beverage volume increased 2%, primarily reflecting our acquisition of WBD, which contributed over 3 percentage points to volume growth, and increased at a low-single-digit rate for the comparable post-acquisition period. A double-digit decline in Poland, a mid-single-digit decline in Germany and a low-single-digit decline in Russia (ex-WBD) were partially offset by a mid-single-digit increase in the United Kingdom.

Reported operating profit increased 14%, reflecting the net revenue growth and the timing of advertising and marketing expenses, partially offset by higher commodity costs. Excluding the items affecting comparability in the above table (see “Items Affecting Comparability”), operating profit increased 7%. The benefit in the prior year from the accelerated timing of concentrate shipments in connection with our global SAP implementation and the impact of less-favorable settlements of promotional spending accruals in the current year each negatively impacted reported operating profit growth by 4 percentage points. Unfavorable foreign currency reduced operating profit performance by 7 percentage points.


	12 Weeks Ended				%			12 Weeks Ended				%			24 Weeks Ended				%
	3/24/12		3/19/11		Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change			6/16/12		6/11/11		Change
Net revenue	$	1,267	$	1,128		12		$	1,765	$	1,923		(8	)	$	3,032	$	3,051		(1	)

Impact of foreign currency translation						–							4							2

Net revenue growth, on a constant currency basis*						12							(4	)						2	**

Operating profit	$	148	$	146		2		$	165	$	299		(45	)	$	313	$	445		(29	)
Restructuring and impairment charges		9		–					8		–					17		–
Restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi									137		–					137		–

Operating profit excluding above item	$	157	$	146		7
Operating profit excluding above items*								$	310	$	299		4		$	467	$	445		5

Impact of foreign currency translation						(1	)						3							1.5

Operating profit growth excluding above item, on a constant currency basis*						6
Operating profit growth excluding above items, on a constant currency basis*													7							7	**

Net revenue declined 8%, reflecting the impact of the transaction with Tingyi and the deconsolidation of International Dairy and Juice Limited (IDJ), which negatively impacted net revenue performance by 13 percentage points and 2 percentage points, respectively, partially offset by volume growth and effective net pricing. Unfavorable foreign currency negatively impacted net revenue performance by 4 percentage points.

Snacks volume grew ~~16%~~19%, reflecting broad-based increases driven by double-digit growth in the Middle East, ~~Australia~~China and India. ~~Additionally, China grew at a low-single-digit rate.~~

Beverage volume grew 2%6%, reflecting broad-based increases driven by double-digit growth in India and high-single-digit growth in the Middle East, ~~and India,~~ partially offset by ~~an 11%~~a double-digit decline in China, ~~primarily due to~~which was lapping double-digit growth in the ~~timing~~prior year. The decline in China was also driven by the transitional impact of the ~~New Year’s holiday~~transaction with Tingyi and ~~the impact of~~ the introduction of a 500 ml PET value package in the third quarter of 2011, which largely replaced our 600 ml offering in ~~that~~the market. Acquisitions had a nominal impact on ~~the~~ beverage volume ~~growth rate.~~growth.

Operating profit declined 45%, primarily driven by the items affecting comparability in the above table (see “Items Affecting Comparability”). Excluding the items affecting comparability, operating profit increased 4%, reflecting ~~favorable~~the volume growth and effective net pricing, ~~and the volume growth.~~

~~Operating profit grew 2%, driven primarily by the net revenue growth,~~ partially offset by higher commodity costs. ~~Restructuring charges reduced~~Additionally, the benefits in the prior year from both the accelerated timing of concentrate shipments in connection with our global SAP implementation and the recovery of a previously written-off receivable contributed 7 percentage points and 3 percentage points, respectively, to the reported operating profit ~~growth~~decline. Unfavorable foreign currency negatively impacted reported operating profit performance by ~~nearly 6~~3 percentage points. ~~Favorable foreign currency increased~~Excluding the restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi listed in the above items affecting comparability, the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures positively impacted reported operating profit ~~growth~~performance by 5.5 percentage points.

Net revenue declined 1%, reflecting the impact of the transaction with Tingyi and the deconsolidation of IDJ, which negatively impacted net revenue performance by 8 percentage points and 1 percentage point, respectively, partially offset by volume growth and effective net pricing. Unfavorable foreign currency negatively impacted net revenue performance by over 2 percentage points.

Snacks volume grew 17%, reflecting broad-based increases driven by double-digit growth in the Middle East, India, China and Australia.

Beverage volume grew 5%, reflecting broad-based increases driven by double-digit growth in India and the Middle East, partially offset by a double-digit decline in China, which was lapping high-single-digit growth in the prior year. The decline in China was also driven by the timing of the New Year’s holiday, the introduction of a 500 ml PET value package in the third quarter of 2011, which largely replaced our 600 ml offering in the market, and the transitional impact of the transaction with Tingyi. Acquisitions had a nominal impact on beverage volume growth.

Operating profit declined 29%, primarily driven by the items affecting comparability in the above table (see “Items Affecting Comparability”). Excluding the items affecting comparability, operating profit increased 5%, reflecting the volume growth and effective net pricing, partially offset by higher commodity costs. Additionally, the benefits in the prior year from the accelerated timing of concentrate shipments in connection with our global SAP implementation and the recovery of a previously written-off receivable contributed 5 percentage points and 4 percentage points, respectively, to the reported operating profit decline. Unfavorable foreign currency negatively impacted operating profit performance by 1.5 percentage points. Excluding the restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi listed in the above items affecting comparability, the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures ~~reduced~~positively impacted reported operating profit ~~growth~~performance by ~~0.5~~4 percentage points.

We believe that our cash generating capability and financial condition, together with our revolving credit facilities and other available methods of debt financing (including long-term debt financing which, depending upon market conditions, we may use to replace a portion of our commercial paper borrowings), will be adequate to meet our operating, investing and financing needs. Sources of cash available to us to fund cash outflows, such as our anticipated share repurchases and dividend

payments, include cash from operations and proceeds obtained in the U.S. debt markets. However, there can be no assurance that volatility in the global capital and credit markets will not impair our ability to access these markets on terms commercially acceptable to us or at all.

As of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of ~~$2.9~~$3.2 billion outside the U.S. In addition, currency restrictions enacted by the government in Venezuela have impacted our ability to pay dividends outside of the country from our snack and beverage operations in Venezuela. As of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, our operations in Venezuela held ~~11%~~10% of our cash and cash equivalents balance. To the extent foreign earnings are repatriated, such amounts would be subject to income tax liabilities, both in the U.S. and in the various applicable foreign tax jurisdictions.

During the 1224 weeks in 2012, net cash ~~used for~~provided by operating activities was ~~$690 million,~~$1.2 billion, compared to net cash provided of ~~$380 million~~$2.4 billion in the prior year period. The operating cash flow performance primarily reflects discretionary pension and ~~post-retirement~~retiree medical contributions of ~~$1.0~~$1 billion in the current year.

During the 1224 weeks in 2012, net cash used for investing activities was ~~$257 million,~~$1.1 billion, primarily reflecting ~~$299 million~~$0.9 billion for net capital ~~spending.~~spending and $0.3 billion of cash payments related to the transaction with Tingyi.

During the 1224 weeks in 2012, net cash ~~provided by~~used for financing activities was ~~$283~~$292 million, primarily reflecting ~~net proceeds from long-term debt of $2.7 billion and stock option proceeds of $274 million, partially offset by net payments of short-term borrowings of $1.8 billion and~~ the return of operating cash flow to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividend payments of ~~$958 million.~~$2.8 billion, mostly offset by net proceeds from long-term debt of $1.7 billion, stock option proceeds of $0.5 billion and net proceeds of short-term borrowings of $0.3 billion. We anticipate dividends and share repurchases of more than $6 billion in 2012.

We focus on management operating cash flow as a key element in achieving maximum shareholder value, and it is the primary measure we use to monitor cash flow performance. However, it is not a measure provided by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Therefore, this measure is not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for U.S. GAAP cash flow measures.value. Since net capital spending is essential to our product innovation initiatives and maintaining our operational capabilities, we believe that it is a recurring and necessary use of cash. As such, we believe investors should also consider net capital spending when evaluating our cash from operating activities. Additionally, we consider certain items (included in the table below), in evaluating management operating cash flow. We believe investors should consider these items in evaluating our management operating cash flow results. Management operating cash flow excluding certain items is the primary measure we use to monitor cash flow performance. However, it is not a measure provided by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Therefore, this measure is not, and should not be viewed as, a substitute for U.S. GAAP cash flow measures.

The table below reconciles net cash provided by operating activities, as reflected in our cash flow statement, to our management operating cash flow excluding the impact of the items below.


	12 Weeks Ended						24 Weeks Ended
	3/24/12			3/19/11			6/16/12			6/11/11
Net cash (used for)/provided by operating activities	$	(690	)	$	380
Net cash provided by operating activities							$	1,247		$	2,353
Capital spending		(316	)		(433	)		(901	)		(1,231	)
Sales of property, plant and equipment		17			12			42			34

Management operating cash flow		(989	)		(41	)		388			1,156
Discretionary pension and retiree medical contributions		1,000			–
Payments related to restructuring charges		44			1
Discretionary pension and retiree medical contributions (after-tax)								770			–
Payments related to restructuring charges (after-tax)								100			1
Merger and integration payments (after-tax)		20			97			34			158
Capital investments related to the PBG/PAS integration		4			21			8			50
Capital investments related to the Productivity Plan								5			–
Cash payments for restructuring and other charges related to the transaction with Tingyi								88			–

Management operating cash flow excluding above items	$	79		$	78		$	1,393		$	1,365

We expect to continue to return management operating cash flow to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases while maintaining credit ratings that provide us with ready access to global and capital credit markets. However, see Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Our Business Risks, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 for certain factors that may impact our operating cash flows.

Any downgrade of our credit ratings by a credit rating agency, especially any downgrade to below investment grade, could increase our future borrowing costs or impair our ability to access capital and credit markets on terms commercially acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, any downgrade of our current short-term credit ratings could impair our ability to access the commercial paper market with the same flexibility that we have experienced historically, and therefore require us to rely more heavily on more expensive types of debt financing. See Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Our Business Risks, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 andDebt Obligations and Commitments in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We have reviewed the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of PepsiCo, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012, the related Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended June 16, 2012 and June 11, 2011, and the related Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Income, Comprehensive Income,~~ Cash Flows and Equity for the ~~twelve~~twenty-four weeks ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of PepsiCo, Inc.’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Consolidated Balance Sheet of PepsiCo, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011, and the related Consolidated Statements of Income, Cash Flows and Equity for the fiscal year then ended not presented herein; and in our report dated February 27, 2012, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the Consolidated Balance Sheet from which it has been derived.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Our Business Risks” andFinancial Instruments in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, see Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Our Business Risks in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

During our ~~first~~second fiscal quarter of 2012, we continued migrating certain of our financial processing systems to an enterprise-wide systems solution. These systems implementations are part of our ongoing global business transformation initiative, and we plan to continue implementing such systems throughout other parts of our businesses over the course of the next few years. Moreover, we continue to integrate our WBD business, which was acquired in 2011. In connection with these implementations and integration, and resulting business process changes, we continue to enhance the design and documentation of our internal control over financial reporting processes to maintain suitable controls over our financial reporting.

Except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our ~~first~~second fiscal quarter of 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We and our subsidiaries are party to a variety of legal, administrative, regulatory and government proceedings, claims and inquiries arising in the normal course of business. While the results of these proceedings, claims and inquiries cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of the foregoing will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, results of operations or cash flows. See Item 1. Business – Regulatory Environment and Environmental Compliance in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

A summary of our common stock repurchases (in millions, except average price per share) during the ~~first~~second quarter under the $15.0 billion repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors and publicly announced on March 15, 2010, and expiring on June 30, 2013, is set forth in the following table. All such shares of common stock were repurchased pursuant to open market ~~transactions, other than 381,528 shares of common stock which were repurchased pursuant to a privately negotiated block trade transaction.~~transactions.

PepsiCo also repurchases shares of its convertible preferred stock from an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) fund established by Quaker in connection with share redemptions by ESOP participants. The following table summarizes our convertible preferred share repurchases during the ~~first~~second quarter.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



~~Exhibit 4.3~~		Form of 4.000% Senior Note due 2042, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2012.

~~Exhibit 4.4~~		Board of Directors Resolutions Authorizing PepsiCo’s Officers to Establish the Terms of the 0.750% Senior Note due 2015, the 2.750% Senior Note due 2022 and the 4.000% Senior Note due 2042, which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2012.

~~Exhibit~~ 10.1		~~Form~~Amendment, dated as of ~~Annual Long-Term Incentive Award Agreement.~~May 9, 2012, effective as of June 14, 2012, to Four-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2011, among PepsiCo, Inc., as Borrower, the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.

Exhibit 12		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

Exhibit 15		Letter re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.



Exhibit 24		Power of Attorney executed by Indra K. Nooyi, Hugh F. Johnston, Marie T. Gallagher, Shona L. Brown, Ian M. Cook, Dina Dublon, Victor J. Dzau, Ray L. Hunt, Alberto Ibargüen, Sharon Percy Rockefeller, James J. Schiro, Lloyd G. Trotter, Daniel Vasella and Alberto Weisser, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 24 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 25, 2012.

Exhibit 31		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 101		The following materials from PepsiCo, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity, and (vi) notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.


North Carolina		13-1584302
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York		10577
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


	Page No.
Part I Financial Information

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		3

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income – 12 and 24 Weeks Ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011		3

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income – 12 and 24 Weeks Ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011		4

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows – 1224 Weeks Ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011		5-6

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet – ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and December 31, 2011		7-8

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity – 1224 Weeks Ended ~~March 24,~~June 16, 2012 and ~~March 19,~~June 11, 2011		9

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		~~10-25~~10-27

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		~~26-41~~28-48

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		4249

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4350

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		4350

Part II Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		4451

Item 1A. Risk Factors		4451

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		~~45-46~~52-53

Item 6. Exhibits		4653


	(Unaudited)
	3/24/12			12/31/11
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities
Short-term obligations	$	5,656		$	6,205
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		11,180			11,757
Income taxes payable		149			192

Total Current Liabilities		16,985			18,154

Long-term Debt Obligations		22,054			20,568

Other Liabilities		7,323			8,266

Deferred Income Taxes		5,075			4,995

Total Liabilities		51,437			51,983

Commitments and Contingencies

Preferred Stock, no par value		41			41
Repurchased Preferred Stock		(158	)		(157	)

PepsiCo Common Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, par value 1 2/3 cents per share:
Authorized 3,600 shares, issued 3/12 and 12/11 – 1,865 shares		31			31
Capital in excess of par value		4,251			4,461
Retained earnings		40,631			40,316
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(4,464	)		(6,229	)
Less: repurchased common stock, at cost: 3/12 – 298 shares, 12/11 – 301 shares		(17,691	)		(17,875	)

Total PepsiCo Common Shareholders’ Equity		22,758			20,704

Noncontrolling interests		313			311

Total Equity		22,954			20,899

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	74,391		$	72,882


	(Unaudited)
	6/16/12			12/31/11
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities
Short-term obligations	$	7,038		$	6,205
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		11,153			11,757
Income taxes payable		78			192

Total Current Liabilities		18,269			18,154

Long-term Debt Obligations		21,294			20,568

Other Liabilities		7,365			8,266

Deferred Income Taxes		4,867			4,995

Total Liabilities		51,795			51,983

Commitments and Contingencies

Preferred Stock, no par value		41			41
Repurchased Preferred Stock		(160	)		(157	)

PepsiCo Common Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, par value 1 2/3 cents per share:
Authorized 3,600 shares, issued 6/12 and 12/11 – 1,865 shares		31			31
Capital in excess of par value		4,223			4,461
Retained earnings		41,274			40,316
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(6,636	)		(6,229	)
Less: repurchased common stock, at cost: 6/12 – 307 shares, 12/11 – 301 shares		(18,316	)		(17,875	)

Total PepsiCo Common Shareholders’ Equity		20,576			20,704

Noncontrolling interests		138			311

Total Equity		20,595			20,899

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	72,390		$	72,882


	~~12 Weeks~~ ~~Ended~~
	~~3/19/11~~
~~Expected life~~		~~6 yrs.~~
~~Risk free interest rate~~		~~2.6~~	%
~~Expected volatility~~^(a)		16	%
~~Expected dividend yield~~		~~2.9~~	%


	24 Weeks Ended
	6/16/12			6/11/11
Expected life		6 yrs.			6 yrs.
Risk free interest rate		1.3	%		2.6	%
Expected volatility^(a)		17	%		16	%
Expected dividend yield		3.0	%		2.9	%


Organic Net Revenue Growth
12 Weeks Ended 6/16/2012	FLNA			QFNA			LAF			PAB			Europe			AMEA			Total
Reported Growth		3	%		–	%		8	%		(5	)%		(5	)%		(8	)%		(2	)%
% Impact of:
Foreign exchange		–			1			9			0.5			8			4			3
Acquisitions and divestitures		–			–			(3	)		7			–			15			4

Organic Growth^(a)		4	%		1	%		14	%		2	%		3	%		10	%		5	%


Organic Net Revenue Growth
24 Weeks Ended 6/16/2012	FLNA			QFNA			LAF			PAB			Europe			AMEA			Total
Reported Growth		3.5	%		(1	)%		9	%		(3.5	)%		1	%		(1	)%		–	%
% Impact of:
Foreign exchange		–			–			8			–			7			2			2.5
Acquisitions and divestitures		–			–			(2	)		5			(4	)		9			2

Organic Growth^(a)		4	%		(0.5	)%		15	%		2	%		3	%		11	%		5	%


Period	Total Number of Shares Repurchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that may Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
12/31/11							$	11,047
1/1/12 – 1/28/12		–		–		–		–

								11,047
1/29/12 – 2/25/12		–		–		–		–

								11,047
2/26/12 – 3/24/12		4.5	$	65.15		4.5		(294	)

Total		4.5	$	65.15		4.5	$	10,753


		PepsiCo, Inc.
		(Registrant)

Date: ~~April 26,~~July 25, 2012		/s/ Marie T. Gallagher
		Marie T. Gallagher
		Senior Vice President and Controller

Date: ~~April 26,~~July 25, 2012		/s/ ~~Maura Abeln Smith~~Kelly Tullier
		~~Maura Abeln Smith~~Kelly Tullier
		~~PepsiCo General Counsel, Public Policy &~~Senior Vice President,
		~~Government Affairs and Corporate Secretary~~Deputy General Counsel (Duly Authorized Officer)


EXHIBITS

Exhibit 2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 3, 2009, among PepsiCo, Inc., The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. (the schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K), which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2009.

Exhibit 2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 3, 2009, among PepsiCo, Inc., PepsiAmericas, Inc. and Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. (the schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K), which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2009.

Exhibit 2.3		Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2010 among PepsiCo, Inc., Pepsi-Cola (Bermuda) Limited, Gavril A. Yushvaev, David Iakobachvili, Mikhail V. Dubinin, Sergei A. Plastinin, Alexander S. Orlov, Mikhail I. Vishnaykov, Aladaro Limited, Tony D. Maher, Dmitry Ivanov, Wimm Bill Dann Finance Cyprus Ltd. and Wimm-Bill-Dann Finance Co. Ltd. (the schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K), which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 2010.

Exhibit 3.1		Articles of Incorporation of PepsiCo, Inc., as amended and restated, effective as of May 9, 2011, which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to PepsiCo, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2011.

Exhibit 3.2		By-laws of PepsiCo, Inc., as amended, effective as of March 8, 2012, which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to PepsiCo, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2012.

Exhibit ~~4.1~~		Form of 0.750% Senior Note due 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2012.

~~Exhibit 4.2~~		Form of 2.750% Senior Note due 2022, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to PepsiCo’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2012.


		N/A