UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the

Quarter and nine monthQuarterly period ended March 31, 20122013

LOGO


Commission File Number: 000-26926

ScanSource,

ScanSource, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

SOUTH CAROLINA 57-0965380

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

6 Logue Court

Greenville, South Carolina, 29615

(Address of principal executive offices)

(864) 288-2432

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post to such files.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨¨  (Do(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class

 

Outstanding at April 27, 2012

30, 2013

Common Stock, no par value per share

 27,578,39027,882,395 shares



SCANSOURCE, INC.


SCANSOURCE, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

March 31, 20122013

  Page #

  4

Item 1.

 4

 4

 5

 6

7

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 4.
  
28Item 1A.
Item 6.
 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

  29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION30

Item 1A.

Risk Factors30

Item 6.

Exhibits32

SIGNATURES

33

34



2


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


The forward-looking statements included in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and “Risk Factors” sections and elsewhere herein, which reflect our best judgment based on factors currently known, involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “plans,” “hopes”“hopes,” “forecasts” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Except as may be required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in such sections and, in particular, those set forth in the cautionary statements included in “Risk Factors” contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011.2012. The forward-looking information we have provided in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the safe harbor established under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, should be evaluated in the context of these factors.


3


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements

SCANSOURCE,
SCANSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except for share information)

   March 31,
2012
  June 30,
2011
 
Assets   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $34,295   $28,747  

Accounts receivable, less allowance of $26,791 at March 31, 2012 and $26,562 at June 30, 2011

   445,206    462,102  

Inventories

   501,980    467,350  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   35,460    35,421  

Deferred income taxes

   16,731    15,894  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   1,033,672    1,009,514  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

   46,332    36,819  

Goodwill

   56,363    59,090  

Other assets, including identifiable intangible assets

   71,174    76,765  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $1,207,541   $1,182,188  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity   

Current liabilities:

   

Short-term borrowings

  $—     $3,164  

Current portion of contingent consideration

   5,061    2,398  

Accounts payable

   397,163    406,453  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   62,321    60,157  

Income taxes payable

   1,341    5,175  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   465,886    477,347  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Long-term debt

   5,429    30,429  

Borrowings under revolving credit facility

   41,491    26,513  

Long-term portion of contingent consideration

   14,678    21,396  

Other long-term liabilities

   37,607    39,109  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   565,091    594,794  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

   

Shareholders’ equity:

   

Preferred stock, no par value; 3,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

   —      —    

Common stock, no par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized, 27,553,590 and 27,109,932 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively

   137,348    123,608  

Retained earnings

   514,659    460,157  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   (9,557  3,629  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   642,450    587,394  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $1,207,541   $1,182,188  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2012
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$93,905
 $29,173
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $30,996 at March 31, 2013
and $27,349 at June 30, 2012
431,264
 470,808
Inventories407,093
 475,479
Prepaid expenses and other current assets42,041
 41,846
Deferred income taxes14,687
 14,624
Total current assets988,990
 1,031,930
Property and equipment, net49,008
 48,785
Goodwill53,743
 53,885
Other non-current assets, including identifiable intangible assets66,698
 67,206
Total assets$1,158,439
 $1,201,806
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity   
Current liabilities:   
Short-term borrowings$
 $4,268
Accounts payable325,658
 419,683
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities68,169
 67,776
Current portion of contingent consideration4,524
 4,976
Income taxes payable2,699
 1,698
Total current liabilities401,050
 498,401
Deferred income taxes2,879
 
Long-term debt5,429
 5,429
Long-term portion of contingent consideration8,797
 11,677
Other long-term liabilities30,372
 33,988
Total liabilities448,527
 549,495
Commitments and contingencies

 

Shareholders’ equity:   
Preferred stock, no par value; 3,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
 
Common stock, no par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized, 27,872,395 and 27,604,840 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively146,975
 139,557
Retained earnings582,421
 534,445
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(19,484) (21,691)
Total shareholders’ equity709,912
 652,311
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$1,158,439
 $1,201,806
June30, 2011 results2012 amounts are derived from audited consolidated financial statementsstatements.
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements


4

SCAN
SOURCE,

SCANSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share data)

   Quarter ended
March 31,
  Nine months ended
March 31,
 
   2012  2011  2012  2011 

Net sales

  $707,883   $613,466   $2,260,827   $1,931,641  

Cost of goods sold

   638,615    547,637    2,032,630    1,731,704  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   69,268    65,829    228,197    199,937  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   46,711    40,349    141,753    116,071  

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

   1,072    —      1,244    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   21,485    25,480    85,200    83,866  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest expense

   254    429    1,490    1,182  

Interest income

   (780  (313  (2,233  (918

Other (income) expense, net

   206    300    3,363    492  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   21,805    25,064    82,580    83,110  

Provision for income taxes

   7,049    8,530    28,077    29,248  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $14,756   $16,534   $54,503   $53,862  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per share data:

     

Net income per common share, basic

  $0.54   $0.61   $2.00   $2.01  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic

   27,489    26,938    27,290    26,811  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per common share, diluted

  $0.53   $0.60   $1.97   $1.98  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted

   27,926    27,413    27,709    27,182  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

 Quarter ended Nine months ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
Net sales$682,965
 $707,883
 $2,164,286
 $2,260,827
Cost of goods sold614,133
 638,615
 1,947,063
 2,032,630
Gross profit68,832
 69,268
 217,223
 228,197
Selling, general and administrative expenses47,937
 46,711
 144,392
 141,753
Change in fair value of contingent consideration100
 1,072
 1,396
 1,244
Operating income20,795
 21,485
 71,435
 85,200
Interest expense102
 254
 356
 1,490
Interest income(483) (780) (1,648) (2,233)
Other (income) expense, net(4) 206
 34
 3,363
Income before income taxes21,180
 21,805
 72,693
 82,580
Provision for income taxes7,202
 7,049
 24,716
 28,077
Net income$13,978
 $14,756
 $47,977
 $54,503
Per share data:       
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic27,847
 27,489
 27,725
 27,290
Net income per common share, basic$0.50
 $0.54
 $1.73
 $2.00
        
Weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted28,024
 27,926
 27,960
 27,709
Net income per common share, diluted$0.50
 $0.53
 $1.72
 $1.97
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.


5

SCAN
SOURCE,

SCANSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)

 Quarter ended Nine months ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
Net income$13,978
 $14,756
 $47,977
 $54,503
Unrealized gain on hedged transaction, net of tax
 
 
 139
Foreign currency translation adjustment(3,107) 4,965
 2,206
 (13,325)
Comprehensive income$10,871
 $19,721
 $50,183
 $41,317
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.


6


SCANSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

   Nine months ended March 31, 
   2012  2011 

Cash flows from operating activities:

   

Net income

  $54,503   $53,862  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

   

Depreciation and amortization

   7,594    4,350  

Provision for accounts and notes receivable

   4,968    5,443  

Share-based compensation and restricted stock

   5,515    3,464  

Deferred income taxes

   (5,387  70  

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

   (150  444  

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

   1,244    —    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

   

Accounts receivable

   90    (19,019

Inventories

   (44,859  (45,713

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   1,424    (14,891

Other noncurrent assets

   (486  (8,765

Accounts payable

   (297  (1,974

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   3,557    22,410  

Income taxes payable

   (2,648  (1,227
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   25,068    (1,546
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

   

Capital expenditures

   (10,187  (10,198

Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

   —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   (10,187  (10,198
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

   

Increases (decreases) in short-term borrowings, net

   (2,949  1,828  

Borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit, net of debt issue costs

   14,296    1,257  

Exercise of stock options

   8,071    4,878  

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

   150    (444

Repayments of long-term debt

   (25,000  —    

Contingent consideration payments

   (2,000  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (7,432  7,519  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (1,901  801  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   5,548    (3,424

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   28,747    34,605  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $34,295   $31,181  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

 Nine months ended
 March 31,
 2013 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income$47,977
 $54,503
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization6,863
 7,594
Provision for accounts and notes receivable8,312
 4,968
Share-based compensation and restricted stock4,565
 5,515
Deferred income taxes(4,028) (5,387)
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements(849) (150)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration1,396
 1,244
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:   
Accounts receivable33,605
 90
Inventories70,626
 (44,859)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(303) 1,424
Other non-current assets3,658
 (486)
Accounts payable(94,951) (297)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(2,696) 3,557
Income taxes payable1,831
 (2,648)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities76,006
 25,068
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Capital expenditures(4,463) (10,187)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(4,463) (10,187)
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Borrowings (repayments) on short-term borrowings, net(4,459) (2,949)
Borrowings on revolving credit515,262
 1,132,968
Repayments on revolving credit(515,877) (1,117,312)
Debt issuance costs
 (1,360)
Repayments on long-term debt
 (25,000)
Contingent consideration payments(4,777) (2,000)
Exercise of stock options2,231
 8,071
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements849
 150
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(6,771) (7,432)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(40) (1,901)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents64,732
 5,548
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period29,173
 28,747
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$93,905
 $34,295
See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.


7

SCAN
SOURCE,

SCANSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)


(1) Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Business Description


ScanSource,ScanSource, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is thea leading wholesale distributor of specialty technology products, providing value-added distribution servicessales to resellers.resellers in specialty technology markets. The Company has two geographic distribution segments: onethe North American distribution segment serving North Americathe United States and Canada from the Southaven, Mississippi distribution center, and an international segment currently serving Latin America and Europe from distribution centers located in Florida, Mexico and Brazil, and serving Europe from Belgium.in Belgium, respectively. Each segment is managed around its geographic customer and vendor bases and is supported by its centralized infrastructure, such as warehousing and back office operations as appropriate. The North American distribution segment markets automatic identification and data capture (“AIDC”) and point-of-sale (“POS”) products through its ScanSourceScanSource POS and BarcodingBarcode sales unit; voice, data, video and converged communications equipment through its CatalystTelecom sales unit; video conferencing, telephony and ScanSourcecommunications products through its ScanSource Communications sales units;unit; and physicalelectronic security products and wireless infrastructure products through its ScanSourceScanSource Security sales unit. The international distribution segment markets AIDC, POS, communications and security products as follows: ScanSourcethrough its ScanSource Latin America markets AIDC, POS, communications and security products; ScanSource Europe marketssales unit; AIDC and POS products whilethrough its ScanSource POS and Barcode, Europe sales unit; and communication products are marketed through its ScanSourceScanSource Communications, Europe sales unit in Europe.

On April 15, 2011, the Company purchased all of the shares of CDC Brasil S.A (“CDC”). CDC is the leading POS and Barcoding distributor in Brazil. CDC, headquartered in Curitiba, Brazil, is now included under the ScanSource Latin America operating unit.


Basis of Presentation


The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of ScanSource,ScanSource, Inc. have been prepared by the Company’s management in accordance with U.S.United States generally accepted accounting principles ("US GAAP") for interim financial information and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring and non-recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011,2012, the results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the statements of comprehensive income for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and the statementstatements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. The results of operations for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 20112012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.2012

.


We have restated the presentation of borrowings and repayments on revolving credit and debt issuance costs in the statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. Related amounts had previously been presented on a net basis, rather than on a gross basis in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 230. The correction had no effect on net cash used in financing activities.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Except as described below, there have been no material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 from the information included in Note 2 of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.2012. For a discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies, please see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

2012.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains twosome zero-balance, disbursement accounts at separatevarious financial institutions in which the Company does not maintain significant depository relationships. Due to the nature of the Company’s banking relationships with these institutions, the Company does not have the right to offset most if not all outstanding cash disbursements in excess ofchecks written from these accounts against cash on hand are presented in accounts payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Cash disbursementshand. Checks released but not yet cleared from these accounts in the amounts of $45.5$47.3 million and $73.6$48.2 million are presentedincluded in accounts payable as of March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011,2012, respectively.



8


Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2011-04,Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this update are the result of the work of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to develop common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendment becomes effectiveEffective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, which isfor fiscal 2013, the current period ended March 31, 2012 for the Company. This amendmentCompany has had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.implemented Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2011-05,

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The objective of this update is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. TheThis update will become effective for fiscal years, and the interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, which will be fiscal 2013 for the Company. The update will eliminateeliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’shareholders’ equity which is the Company’s current practiceor in a separate footnote and will requirerequires companies to present all nonowner changes in stockholders’shareholders’ equity either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company is currently determining which methodhas elected to present a separate condensed consolidated statement of presentationcomprehensive income.


Effective for the annual goodwill impairment testing during fiscal 2013, the Company will be used in future filings.

In September 2011, the FASB issuedimplement ASU 2011-08,Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The objective of this update is to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The amendments in the update permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have an impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.


In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This amendment isallows companies to first assess qualitative factors of impairment of all indefinite-lived intangible assets, similar to the provisions in ASU 2011-08. The amendment becomes effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after DecemberSeptember 15, 2011, which will be fiscal 2013 for the Company. Early2012, but early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the future impacthas elected early adoption for this amendment. The adoption of this ASUamendment did not have an impact on itsthe Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.


(2) Earnings Per Share


Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common and potential common shares outstanding.

   Quarter ended March 31,   Nine months ended March 31, 
   2012   2011   2012   2011 
   (in thousands, except per share data) 

Numerator:

        

Net Income

  $14,756    $16,534    $54,503    $53,862  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator:

        

Weighted-average shares, basic

   27,489     26,938     27,290     26,811  

Dilutive effect of share-based payments

   437     475     419     371  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares, diluted

   27,926     27,413     27,709     27,182  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per common share, basic

  $0.54    $0.61    $2.00    $2.01  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per common share, diluted

  $0.53    $0.60    $1.97    $1.98  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 


 Quarter ended Nine months ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:       
Net Income$13,978
 $14,756
 $47,977
 $54,503
Denominator:       
Weighted-average shares, basic27,847
 27,489
 27,725
 27,290
Dilutive effect of share-based payments177
 437
 235
 419
Weighted-average shares, diluted28,024
 27,926
 27,960
 27,709
        
Net income per common share, basic$0.50
 $0.54
 $1.73
 $2.00
Net income per common share, diluted$0.50
 $0.53
 $1.72
 $1.97

For the quarter and year-to-date periodnine months ended March 31, 2012,2013, there were 260,9011,119,940 and 597,8721,097,610 weighted average shares outstanding respectively, that are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. For the quarter and year-to-date periodnine months ended March 31, 2011,2012, there were 475,289260,901 and 371,253597,872 weighted average shares outstanding respectively, that are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.



9

Table of Contents

(3) Restructuring Costs

(3)In April 2013, the Company implemented a restructuring plan for its Communications business unit in Europe to support a strategy for profitable growth. In the March 2013 quarter, the Company recorded a liability for expected restructuring costs of $1.2 million related to the termination of employees for workforce reductions. This charge is included in selling, general and administration costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated income statements. The liability, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, is expected to be substantially utilized by the end of fiscal 2013.

(4) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of the following:

   Quarter ended   Nine months ended 
  March 31,   March 31, 
   2012   2011   2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Net income

  $14,756    $16,534    $54,503   $53,862  

Unrealized gain on hedged transaction, net of tax

   —       127     139    337  

Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments

   4,965     6,101     (13,325  12,974  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income

  $19,721    $22,762    $41,317   $67,173  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss)


Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following:

   March 31,
2012
  June 30,
2011
 
   (in thousands) 

Currency translation adjustment

  $(9,557 $3,768  

Unrealized gain (loss) on fair value of interest rate swap

   —      (139
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  $(9,557 $3,629  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(4) Acquisitions

CDC Brasil, S.A.

On April 15, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the shares of CDC, Brazil’s leading distributor of AIDC and POS solutions. This acquisition gives the Company an established presence in Latin America’s largest specialty technology market and allows the Company to more easily scale its Latin American operations.

Under the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company structured the purchase transaction as an all cash share purchase with an initial payment of $36.2 million, net of cash acquired, and assumed working capital payables and debt at closing. The remaining purchase price will be paid in annual cash installments based upon the financial performance of CDC for the twelve month periods ended on June 30, from 2011 through 2015.

In the current quarter, the Company finalized the purchase accounting for the CDC acquisition. The Company has elected to record all purchase accounting adjustments in the current quarter as opposed to retrospective application set forth in ASC 805. We have determined that retrospective application is immaterial to the users of the Company’s financial statements. The adjustments made during the quarter pertain to the finalization of the purchase price allocation to the fair value of customer relationships, pre-acquisition contingency liabilities and corresponding indemnification assets and deferred income taxes. These adjustments are summarized in the following table:

   As of April 15, 2011 
   Preliminary
Purchase
Allocation
  Purchase
Accounting
Adjustments
  Revised
Purchase
Allocation
 
   (in thousands) 

Consideration

  

Initial cash payment, net of cash acquired

  $36,228   $—     $36,228  

Fair value of earnout obligation

   23,952    —      23,952  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total consideration

  $60,180   $—     $60,180  

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed

    

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

  $21,378   $—     $21,378  

Inventories

   30,560    —      30,560  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   3,575     3,575  

Current deferred income taxes, net

   1,409    (3,225  (1,816

Property and equipment, net

   1,741    —      1,741  

Intangible assets

   18,327    4,278    22,605  

Escrowed pre-acquisition contingencies receivable

   16,013    7,977    23,990  

Short-term borrowings

   (1,277  —      (1,277

Accounts payable

   (34,006  —      (34,006

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   (3,896  —      (3,896

Income taxes payable

   (2,097  1,174    (923

Escrowed pre-acquisition contingencies payable

   (16,013  (7,977  (23,990

Long-term deferred income taxes, net

   —      (3,141  (3,141

Other long-term liabilities

   (177  —      (177
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total identifiable net assets

   35,537    (914  34,623  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Goodwill

  $24,643   $914   $25,557  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

All adjustments above are as of the acquisition date.

In the current quarter, we recorded incremental amortization expense to catch up accumulated amortization for the additional purchase price allocated to customer relationships as of March 31, 2012. The impact of the incremental amortization and related tax effect are summarized below:

   Quarter ended
March 31, 2012
 
   (in thousands) 

Condensed consolidated income statement

  

Amortization expense

  $441  

Provision for income taxes

  $(150

As of the March 31, 2012 condensed consolidated balance sheet, the Company reflected pre-acquisition contingencies related to the purchase of CDC at $4.3 million and $7.1 million in other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively. These recorded contingencies pertain to Brazilian tax exposures prior to the acquisition date. The Company also had indemnification assets in the same amounts recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets (current) and other assets (noncurrent), respectively. The amounts recorded for pre-acquisition contingencies have decreased from the prior quarter as the statute of limitations on a portion of the contingencies have lapsed. The amount of reasonably possible undiscounted pre-acquisition contingencies as of March 31, 2012, is estimated to range as high as $15.0 million at this time, of which all exposures identified are indemnifiable under the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement.

 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2012
 (in thousands)
Foreign currency translation adjustment$(19,484) $(21,691)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$(19,484) $(21,691)

(5) Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets


The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended March 31, 2012,2013, by operatingreporting segment, are as follows:

   North American
Distribution
Segment
   International
Distribution
Segment
  Total 
   (in thousands) 

Balance as of June 30, 2011

  $20,081    $39,009   $59,090  

Additions

   —       914    914  

Fluctuations in foreign currencies

   —       (3,641  (3,641
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2012

  $20,081    $36,282   $56,363  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

There was no acquisition activity during the quarter or nine months ended March 31, 2012. The change in goodwill from June 30, 2011 relates to purchase accounting adjustments for CDC and foreign exchange fluctuations. See Note 4 for further details regarding purchase accounting adjustments recorded this quarter.

 
North American
Distribution
Segment
 
International
Distribution
Segment
 Total
 (in thousands)
Balance as of June 30, 2012$20,081
 $33,804
 $53,885
     Foreign currency translation adjustment
 (142) (142)
Balance as of March 31, 2013$20,081
 $33,662
 $53,743

Included within other non-current assets described in the condensed consolidated balance sheetsheets are net identifiable intangible assets of $30.0$23.0 million and $32.4$27.1 million at March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011,2012, respectively. These amounts relate primarily to acquired intangible assets including customer relationships, non-compete agreements, trade names, distributor agreements and debt issue costs.


(6) Short TermShort-Term Borrowings and Long TermLong-Term Debt


Short-Term Borrowings


TheA subsidiary of the Company has a €6.0€6.0 million secured revolving line of credit, facility, which bears interest at the 30 day Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus a spread of 1.5% per annum. This facility is secured by the assets of our European operations and is guaranteed by ScanSource,ScanSource, Inc. This agreement can be withdrawn by the lender with minimal notice. The subsidiary line of credit bears interest at the 30-day Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus a spread ranging from 1.25% to 2.00% per annum. The spread in effect as of March 31, 2013 was 1.25%. Additionally, the Company is assessed commitment fees ranging from 0.10% to 0.275% on non-utilized borrowing availability if outstanding balances are below €3.0 million. The interest rate spread and commitment fee rates related to the €6.0 million line of credit refer to the Leverage Ratio as defined by the Company's $300 million multi-currency senior secured revolving credit facility. The outstanding balances at March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 20112012 are as follows:

   March 31,
2012
   June 30,
2011
 
   (in thousands) 

Short-term borrowings

  $—      $3,164  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2012
 (in thousands)
Short-term borrowings$
 $4,268


10


Revolving Credit Facility


On October 11, 2011, the Company amended and restated its $250 millionprimary revolving credit facility, due on September 28, 2012.facility. The Company entered into a five-year, $300five-year, $300 million multi-currency senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) pursuant to the terms of an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “New Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders named therein. The NewRevolving Credit AgreementFacility allows for the issuance of up to $50$50 million for letters of credit and has a $150$150 million accordion feature that allows the Company to increase the availability to $450$450 million subject to obtaining commitments for the incremental capacity from existing or new lenders. TheIn fiscal year 2012, the Company incurred $1.4$1.4 million in debt issuance costs that were capitalized to other non-current assets, including identifiable intangible assets, on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized on a straight-line basis through October 11, 2016, the maturity date of the NewRevolving Credit Agreement.

Facility.


At the Company’sCompany's option, loans denominated in U.S. dollars under the NewRevolving Credit Agreement,Facility, other than swingline loans, shall bear interest at a rate equal to a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or prime rate depending upon the Company’sCompany's ratio of total debt (excluding accounts payable and accrued liabilities) to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), measured as of the end of the most recent year or quarter, as applicable,to adjusted earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for which financial statements have been delivered to the Lendersmost recently completed four quarters (the “Leverage Ratio”). The Leverage Ratio calculation excludes the Company's subsidiary in Brazil. This spread ranges from 1.00% to 2.25% for LIBOR-based loans and 0.00% to 1.25% for prime rate-based loans. The spread in effect as of March 31, 2012,2013 was 1.00% for LIBOR-based loans and 0.00% for Primeprime rate-based loans. Additionally, the Company is assessed commitment fees ranging from 0.175% to 0.40%, depending upon the Leverage Ratio, on non-utilized borrowing availability, excluding swingline loans. Borrowings under the NewRevolving Credit AgreementFacility are guaranteed by substantially all of the domestic assets of the Company as well as certain foreign subsidiaries determined to be material under the New Credit Agreement and a pledge of up to 65% of capital stock or other equity interest in each Guarantor as defined in the NewRevolving Credit Agreement.Facility. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2012. The2013. There were no outstanding balances at March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 20112012. Fluctuations in functional currency rates are as follows:

   March 31,
2012
   June 30,
2011
 
   (in thousands) 

Borrowings under revolving credit facility

  $41,491    $26,513  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Duringreflected in the nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company borrowed $1,133.0 million on the revolving credit facility. The Company repaid $1,117.3 million during the same period. Including cash payments for debt issue costs for $1.4 million, net borrowings for the nine month period were $14.3 million. Additionally, theactivity.


The average daily balance during the nine month period was $92.8 million.

During the nine monthsperiods ended March 31, 2011, the Company borrowed $433.62013 and 2012 was $12.5 million on the revolving credit facility. The Company repaid $432.3 and $92.8 million during the same period. Net borrowings for the nine month period were $1.3 million. Additionally, the average daily balance during the nine month period was $9.5 million.

, respectively.


Long-Term Debt


On August 1, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with the State of Mississippi in order to provide financing for the acquisition and installation of certain equipment to be utilized at the Company’s current Southaven, Mississippi distribution facility, through the issuance of an industrial development revenue bond. The bond matures on September 1, 2032 and accrues interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate plus a spread of 0.85%. The terms of the bond allow for payment of interest only for the first 10 years of the agreement, and then, starting onSeptember 1, 2018 through 2032, principal and interest payments are due until the maturity date or the redemption of the bond. As of March 31, 2012,2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under this bond.

On January 2, 2008, the Company entered into a $25 million promissory note with a third party lender. This note payable accrued interest on the unpaid balance at a rate per annum equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus 0.65% and was scheduled to mature on September 28, 2012. On October 


 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2012
 (in thousands)
Industrial Development Revenue Bond, monthly payments of interest only, 1.05% variable interest rate at March 31, 2013$5,429
 $5,429


11 2011, the note was fully repaid using funds obtained through the New Credit Agreement.

   March 31,
2012
   June 30,
2011
 
   (in thousands) 

Industrial Development Revenue Bond, monthly payments of interest only, 1.09% variable interest rate at March 31, 2012 and maturing on September 1, 2032

  $5,429    $5,429  

Unsecured note payable to a bank, monthly payments of interest only and maturing in fiscal 2013

   —       25,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Less current portion

   —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long-term portion

  $5,429    $30,429  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 



(7) Derivatives and Hedging Activities


The Company’s results of operations could be materially impacted by significant changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. These risks and the management of these risks are discussed in greater detail below. In an effort to manage the exposure to these risks, the Company periodically enters into various derivative instruments. The Company’s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.US GAAP. The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments or the ineffective portions of cash flow hedges are adjusted to fair value through earnings in other income and expense.


Foreign CurrencyThe Company conducts a portion of its business internationally in a variety of foreign currencies. The exposure to market risk for changes in foreign currency exchange rates arises from foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, and transactions arising from non-functional currency financing or trading activities. The Company’s objective is to preserve the economic value of non-functional currency denominated cash flows. The Company attempts to hedge foreign currencytransaction exposures with natural offsets to the fullest extent possible and, once these opportunities have been exhausted, through short term forward contracts or other hedging instruments with third parties. These contracts will periodically hedge the exchange of various currencies, including the U.S. dollar, euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, Mexican peso and Brazilian real. While the Company utilizes foreign exchange contracts and debt in non-functional currencies to hedge foreign currency exposure, the Company’sCompany's foreign exchange policy prohibits the use of financial instruments for speculative transactions.purposes.

At March 31, 2012, the


The Company had contracts outstanding with notional amounts of $69.9$89.2 million and $62.3 million to exchange foreign currencies.currencies as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. To date, the Company has chosen not to designate these derivatives as hedging instruments, and accordingly, these instruments are adjusted to fair value through earnings in other income and expense. Summarized financial information related to these derivative contracts and changes in the underlying value of the foreign currency exposures are as follows:

   Quarter ended March 31,  Nine months ended March 31, 
   2012  2011  2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Net foreign exchange derivative contract gains (losses)

  $(1,666 $(2,352 $(2,863 $(2,310

Net foreign currency transactional and re-measurement gains (losses)

   1,386    1,943    (708  1,565  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net foreign currency gains (losses)

  $(280 $(409 $(3,571 $(745
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 


 Quarter ended Nine months ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
Net foreign exchange derivative contract (gains) losses$(2,092) $(1,666) $(759) $2,863
Net foreign currency transactional and re-measurement (gains) losses2,237
 1,386
 1,087
 708
Net foreign currency (gains) losses$145
 $280
 $328
 $3,571

Net foreign exchange gains and losses consist of foreign currency transactional and functional currency re-measurements, offset by net foreign currency exchange derivative contract gains and losses. Foreign exchange losses and gains are generated as the result of fluctuations in the value of the euroBritish pound versus the British pound,euro, the U.S. dollar versus the euro, U.S. dollar versus the Brazilian real and other currencies versus the U.S. dollar versus other currencies.

Fordollar.


In the year-to-date period,prior year, the majority of foreign currency losses were associated with exposures between the U.S. dollar and Brazilian real. In September 2011, the Company incurred a $2.5$2.5 million non-recurring loss in conjunction with an unfavorable forward exchange contract to purchase Brazilian reais. In mid-August, theThe Company decided to pre-fund a portion of the estimatedcontingent earnout payments associated with the acquisition of CDC acquisition.Brasil, S.A. (“CDC”). This contract was designed to preserve the currency exchange for the few weeks required to transfer the cash to Brazil. From the time the Company entered into the contract through settlement, the real devalued from the contractual rate by 11.8%, ultimately resulting in a $2.5$2.5 million loss. Further contributing to the year-to-dateprior year quarter foreign exchange loss, the Brazilian business incurred significant losses on the remeasurement of U.S. dollar denominated exposures in the first quartertransactions that were not hedged at the time. Subsequently, the Company has been including these exposures in its dailyongoing hedging activities.

Interest Rates —The Company’s earnings are also affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on interest expense from floating rate debt instruments. To manage the exposure to interest rates, the Company may enter into interest rate swap hedges. In January 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the variability in future cash flows



12

Table of interest payments related to the $25 million promissory note payable discussed in Note 6. Interest rate differentials paid or received under the swap agreement are recognized as adjustments to interest expense. To the extent the swap is effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flow, changes in the fair value of the swap are not included in current earnings but are reported as other comprehensive income (loss). The swap expired on September 28, 2011. From the inception of the swap through expiration, there was not any ineffectiveness associated with the instrument. Currently, there are no other swap agreements outstanding.

The components of the cash flow hedge included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes, in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are as follows:

   Quarter ended March 31,  Nine months ended March 31, 
   2012   2011  2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Net interest expense recognized as a result of interest rate swap

  $—      $212   $216   $643  

Unrealized gain (loss) in fair value of interest swap rates

   —       (11  (1  (110
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   —       201    215    533  

Income tax effect

   —       (74  (76  (196
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  $—      $127   $139   $337  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Contents


The Company has the following derivative instruments located on theits condensed consolidated balance sheets and income statements,sheet, utilized for the risk management purposes detailed above:

   As of March 31, 2012 
   Fair Value  of
Derivatives
Designated as Hedge
Instruments
   Fair Value  of
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedge
Instruments
 
   (in thousands) 

Derivative assets(a):

    

Foreign exchange contracts

  $—      $2  

Derivative liabilities(b):

    

Foreign exchange contracts

  $—      $277  

 As of March 31, 2013
 
Fair Value  of
Derivatives
Designated as Hedge
Instruments
 
Fair Value  of
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedge
Instruments
 (in thousands)
Derivative assets:(a)
   
Foreign exchange contracts$
 $248
Derivative liabilities:(b)
   
Foreign exchange contracts$
 $200
(a)All derivative assets are recorded as prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
(b)All derivative liabilities are recorded as accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Accounting guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Under this guidance, the Company is required to classify certain assets and liabilities based on the fair value hierarchy, which groups fair value measured assets and liabilities based upon the following levels of inputs:


Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; and

Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity).


The assets and liabilities maintained by the Company that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the Company’s various debt instruments, deferred compensation plan investments, outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts and contingent consideration owed to the previous owners of CDC. The carrying value of debt listed in Note 6 is considered to approximate fair value, as the Company’s debt instruments are indexed to LIBOR or the prime rate using the market approach (Level 2 criteria). The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s remaining assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012:

   Total   Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 
   (in thousands) 

Assets:

        

Deferred compensation plan investments, current and non-current portion

  $11,847    $11,847    $—      $—    

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

   2     —       2     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets at fair value

  $11,849    $11,847    $2    $—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

        

Deferred compensation plan investments, current and non-current portion

  $11,847    $11,847    $—      $—    

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

   277     —       277     —    

Liability for contingent consideration, current and non-current portion

   19,739     —       —       19,739  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities at fair value

  $31,863    $11,847   $277    $19,739  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2013:


 Total 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 (in thousands)
Assets:       
Deferred compensation plan investments, current and non-current portion$13,822
 $13,822
 $
 $
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts248
 
 248
 
Total assets at fair value$14,070
 $13,822
 $248
 $
Liabilities:       
Deferred compensation plan investments, current and non-current portion$13,822
 $13,822
 $
 $
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts200
 
 200
 
Liability for contingent consideration, current and non-current portion13,321
 
 
 13,321
Total liabilities at fair value$27,343
 $13,822
 $200
 $13,321



13

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s remaining assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012:

 Total 
Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 (in thousands)
Assets:       
Deferred compensation plan investments, current and non-current portion$11,635
 $11,635
 $
 $
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts21
 
 21
 
Total assets at fair value$11,656
 $11,635
 $21
 $
Liabilities:       
Deferred compensation plan investments, current and non-current portion$11,635
 $11,635
 $
 $
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts110
 
 110
 
Liability for contingent consideration, current and non-current portion16,653
 
 
 16,653
Total liabilities at fair value$28,398
 $11,635
 $110
 $16,653

The investments in the deferred compensation plan are held in a rabbi trust and include mutual funds and cash equivalents for payment of non-qualified benefits for certain retired, terminated or active employees. These investments are recorded to prepaid expenses and other current assets (current) or other non-current assets (non-current) depending on their corresponding, anticipated distributions to recipients, which are reported in accrued expenses and other current liabilities (current) or other long-term liabilities, (non-current), respectively.


Foreign currency forward contracts are measured using the market approach on a recurring basis considering foreign currency spot rates and forward rates quoted by banks or foreign currency dealers (Level 2). See Note 7, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities.” Foreign currency contracts are classified in the condensed consolidated balance sheet in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued expenses and other current liabilities, depending on the respective contracts’ favorable or unfavorable positions.


The Company recorded a contingent consideration liability at the acquisition date of CDC representing the amounts payable to former CDC shareholders, as outlined under the terms of the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement, based upon the achievement of projected earnings, net of specific pro forma adjustments. The current and non-current portions of this obligation are reported separately on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of contingent consideration (Level 3) is determined using a discounted cash flow model. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability are recorded to the change in fair value of contingent consideration line item in the condensed consolidated income statement.statements. Fluctuations due to foreign currency translation are captured in other comprehensive income through the changes in foreign currency translation adjustments line item as seen in Note 3, Comprehensive Income.

other comprehensive income.


The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration (Level 3) for the CDC earnout for the quarterquarters and nine month periods months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011

   Contingent consideration for the
quarter ended March 31,
   Contingent consideration for the
nine months ended March 31,
 
   2012  2011   2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Fair value at beginning of period

  $20,002   $—      $23,794   $—    

Issuance of contingent consideration

   —      —       —      —    

Payments

   (2,000  —       (2,000  —    

Change in fair value

   1,072    —       1,244    —    

Fluctuation due to foreign currency translation

   665    —       (3,299  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value at end of period

  $19,739   $—      $19,739   $—    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

2012:


 Contingent consideration for the
quarter ended
 Contingent consideration for the nine months ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
Fair value at beginning of period$13,090
 $20,002
 $16,653
 $23,794
Payments(61) (2,000) (4,777) (2,000)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration100
 1,072
 1,396
 1,244
Foreign currency translation adjustment192
 665
 49
 (3,299)
Fair value at end of period$13,321
 $19,739
 $13,321
 $19,739


14

Table of Contents

The fair value of the liability for the contingent consideration recognized at March 31, 20122013 was $19.7$13.3 million of which $5.1$4.5 million is classified as current. The fair values of amounts owed are recorded in “current portion of contingent consideration” and “long-term portion of contingent consideration” in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. The U.S. dollar amounts of actual disbursements made in conjunctionconnection with future earnout payments are subject to change as the liability is denominated in Brazilian reais and subject to foreign exchange fluctuation risk. Also, in accordance with ASC 805, theThe Company will revalue the contingent consideration liability at each reporting date through the last payment, with changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration reflected in the “change in fair value of contingent consideration” line item on the Company’s condensed consolidated income statement that is included in the calculation of operating income. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability associated with future earnout payments is based on several factors, including:


estimated future results, net of pro forma adjustments set forth in the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement;

the probability of achieving these results; and

a discount rate reflective of the Company’s creditworthiness and market risk premium associated with the Brazilian market.


A change in any of these unobservable inputs can significantly change the fair value of the contingent consideration. The change in fair value of the contingent consideration recognized in the condensed consolidated income statement contributed a losslosses of $1.1$0.1 million and $1.4 million for the quarter and a loss of $1.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012.2013, respectively. The change this quarterin the three and nine month periods is largely driven by the recurring amortization of the unrecognized fair value discount.discount and changes in actual results. In addition, volatility in the foreign exchange between the Brazilian real and the U.S. dollar has driven significant changes in the translation of thethis Brazilian real denominated liability. Although there is no contractual limit, total future undiscounted contingent consideration payments mayare anticipated to range up to $31.7$18.5 million, based on the Company’s best estimate as the earnout is based on a multiple of adjusted earnings.


(9) Segment Information


The Company is a leading wholesale distributor of specialty technology products, providing value-added distribution sales to resellers.resellers in specialty technology markets. The Company has two reporting segments, based on geographic location. The measure of segment profit is operating income, and the accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2 of the notes to condensedthe consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

2012.


North American Distribution


The North American distribution segment offers products for sale in four primary categories: (i)markets AIDC and POS equipment sold by the ScanSourceproducts through its ScanSource POS and BarcodingBarcode sales unit, (ii)unit; voice, data, video and converged communications equipment sold by thethrough its CatalystTelecom sales unit; video conferencing, telephony and (iii) ScanSourcecommunications products through its ScanSource Communications sales unitsunit; and (iv) physicalelectronic security products and wireless infrastructure products sold by the ScanSourcethrough its ScanSource Security sales unit. These products are sold toThe Company serves more than 14,50014,000 resellers and integrators of technology products that are geographically dispersed overin the United States and Canada in a pattern that mirrors population concentration.Canada. No single account represented more than 6% of the Company’s worldwide net sales for the quarters or and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 or 2011.

2012.


International Distribution


The international distribution segment sells to two geographic areas,markets AIDC, POS, communications and security products as follows: ScanSource Latin America aggregated withmarkets AIDC, POS, communications and security products; ScanSource POS and Barcode, Europe and offersmarkets AIDC and POS equipment as well as security and communications products, towhile communication products are marketed through its ScanSource Communications, Europe sales unit. The Company serves more than 16,00014,800 resellers and integrators of technology products.products in Europe and Latin America. Of this segment’s customers, no single account represented more than 1% of the Company’s worldwide net sales during the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2013or2012. Operating income for the international distribution segment in the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

2013 include $1.2 million in restructuring costs, as discussed in Note 3.









15

Table of Contents

Inter-segment sales consist primarily of sales by the North American distribution segment to the international distribution segment. All inter-segment revenues and profits have been eliminated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Selected financial information of each businessreporting segment is presented below:

   Quarter ended March 31,  Nine months ended March 31, 
   2012  2011  2012  2011 
   (In thousands) 

Sales:

     

North American distribution

  $541,049   $467,628   $1,699,106   $1,497,531  

International distribution

   178,038    151,419    594,587    452,394  

Less intersegment sales

   (11,204  (5,581  (32,866  (18,284
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $707,883   $613,466   $2,260,827   $1,931,641  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

     

North American distribution

  $935   $1,000   $2,977   $3,161  

International distribution

   1,819    395    4,617    1,189  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $2,754   $1,395   $7,594   $4,350  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income:

     

North American distribution

  $21,471   $20,089   $77,501   $70,797  

International distribution

   14    5,391    7,699    13,069  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $21,485   $25,480   $85,200   $83,866  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Capital expenditures:

     

North American distribution

  $3,342   $4,354   $7,670   $9,879  

International distribution

   1,333    128    2,517    319  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $4,675   $4,482   $10,187   $10,198  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   March 31, 2012   June 30, 2011 
   (in thousands) 

Assets:

    

North American distribution

  $792,317    $785,057  

International distribution

   415,224     397,131  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,207,541    $1,182,188  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

In prior periods, the Company included its intercompany investment and funding arrangements related to foreign subsidiaries in its North American segment assets and the offsetting liabilities and elimination entries were inappropriately included as a reduction to the international segment’s assets. The effectfollows:


 Quarter ended Nine months ended
 March 31, March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (In thousands)
Sales:       
North American distribution$519,502
 $541,049
 $1,647,115
 $1,699,106
International distribution174,571
 178,038
 562,093
 594,587
Less intersegment sales(11,108) (11,204) (44,922) (32,866)
 $682,965
 $707,883
 $2,164,286
 $2,260,827
Depreciation and amortization:       
North American distribution$939
 $935
 $2,908
 $2,977
International distribution1,335
 1,819
 3,955
 4,617
 $2,274
 $2,754
 $6,863
 $7,594
Operating income (loss):       
North American distribution$24,973
 $21,471
 $73,216
 $77,501
International distribution(4,178) 14
 (1,781) 7,699
 $20,795
 $21,485
 $71,435
 $85,200
Capital expenditures:       
North American distribution$975
 $3,342
 $3,697
 $7,670
International distribution285
 1,333
 766
 2,517
 $1,260
 $4,675
 $4,463
 $10,187
 March 31, 2013 June 30, 2012
 (in thousands)
Assets:   
North American distribution$797,378
 $813,889
International distribution361,061
 387,917
 $1,158,439
 $1,201,806




















16

Table of this understated international segment assets. During the current period, the Company corrected its disclosure of assets by segment by eliminating entries related to intercompany investments and funding arrangements from both segments. Management has concluded that the correction is immaterial and, accordingly, previous filings have not been revised. However, segment assets related to prior periods presented herein have been adjusted to remove intercompany investment and funding arrangements. The effect of this adjustment on segment assets listed above as of June 30, 2011 was to reduce North American segment assets by $173.7 million, from $958.8 million as previously disclosed to $785.1 million and to increase international segment assets by $173.7 million, from $223.4 million as previously disclosed to $397.1 million.

Contents


(10) Commitments and Contingencies


The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to lawsuits arising out of operations. Although there can be no assurance, based upon information known to the Company, the Company believes that any liability resulting from an adverse determination of such lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, or results of operations. See Note 4operations or cash flows.

During the Company's due diligence for discussion ofthe CDC acquisition, several pre-acquisition contingencies associated withwere identified regarding various Brazilian federal and state tax exposures. The Company is able to record indemnification receivables that are reported gross of the pre-acquisition contingency liabilities as they were escrowed in the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement. However, indemnity claims can be made up to the entire purchase price, which includes the initial payment and all future earnout payments. The table below summarizes the balances and line item presentation of CDC.

these pre-acquisition contingencies and corresponding indemnification receivables in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets:

 March 31, 2013June 30, 2012
 (in thousands)
Assets  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets$5,569
$3,886
Other non-current assets$3,196
$5,112
Liabilities  
Other current liabilities$5,569
$3,886
Other long-term liabilities$3,196
$5,112

The change in these contingent liabilities and receivables from June 30, 2012 is driven by foreign currency translation and the lapse of the statute of limitations on a portion of the contingencies.

(11) Income Taxes


The Company had approximately $2.3$1.1 million and $2.1$1.3 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits including interest as of March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011, respectively.2012. Of this total at March 31, 2013, approximately $1.9$0.7 million and $1.8 million represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that are permanent in nature and, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate as of March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively.rate. The Company does not believe that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date.


The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities in countries and states in which it operates. With fewcertain exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2008.

2010.


The Company’s continuing practicepolicy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of March 31, 2012,2013, the Company had approximately $1.0$1.1 million accrued for interest and penalties, $0.1 million of which was a current period expense.

penalties.


Income taxes for the interim period presented have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements on the basis of an estimated annual effective tax rate. In addition to the amount of tax resulting from applying the estimated annual effective tax rate to pre-tax income, the Company includes certain items treated as discrete events to arrive at an estimated overall tax amount. During the quarter, a tax liability of approximately $0.4 million was reversed in Brazil due to the lapse of the statute of limitations.

provision.


The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of income derived from tax jurisdictions with varying income tax rates and a $0.4 millionstate income tax benefit recognized intaxes.

During the March 2012 quarter.

(12) Subsequent Events

In accordance with ASC 855,Subsequent Events,quarter, the Company has evaluated events occurring betweenreviewed and modified its policy toward permanently reinvested foreign earnings.  Prospectively, the endCompany will provide for U.S. income taxes for the earnings of the most recent quarter and the dateits Canadian subsidiary.  Earnings from all other geographies will continue to be considered retained indefinitely for reinvestment.  The tax effect of this accounting policy change is immaterial to the financial statements were filed withstatements.


Recent financial results in Europe have generated pre-tax losses, primarily the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

result of our European Communications business. To the extent the Europe Communications business does not return to profitability as expected, this could affect the valuation of certain deferred tax assets. In the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized.


17

Table of Contents

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Overview

OverviewScanSource

ScanSource,, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a leading wholesale distributor of specialty technology products, providing value-added distribution services to resellers.resellers in specialty technology markets. The Company distributes approximately 100,000 products worldwide. The Company has two geographic distribution segments: onethe North American distribution segment serving North Americathe United States and Canada from ourthe Southaven, Mississippi distribution center, and an international segment currently serving Latin America and Europe from distribution centers located in Florida, Mexico and Brazil, and Belgium.in Belgium, respectively. Each segment is managed around its geographic customer and vendor bases and is supported by its centralized infrastructure, such as warehousing and back office operations as appropriate. The North American distribution segment offersmarkets automatic identification and data capture (“AIDC”) and point-of-sale (“POS”) products for sale in four primary categories: (i) AIDC and POS equipment sold by the ScanSourcethrough its ScanSource POS and BarcodingBarcode sales unit, (ii)unit; voice, data, video and converged communications equipment sold by thethrough its CatalystTelecom sales unit; video conferencing, telephony and (iii) ScanSourcecommunications products through its ScanSource Communications sales unitsunit; and (iv) physicalelectronic security products and wireless infrastructure products sold by the ScanSourcethrough its ScanSource Security sales unit. The international distribution segment markets AIDC, POS, communications and security products as follows: ScanSourcethrough its ScanSource Latin America markets AIDC, POS, communications and security products; ScanSource Europe marketssales unit; AIDC and POS products;products through its ScanSource POS and Barcode, Europe sales unit; and communication products are marketed through its ScanSourceScanSource Communications, Europe sales unit in Europe.unit.


The Company was incorporated in South Carolina in December 1992 and is headquartered in Greenville, South Carolina. The Company serves North America from a single, centrally locatedcentrally-located distribution center located in Southaven, Mississippi, near the FedEx hub. The single warehouse and strong management information system form the cornerstone of the Company’s cost-driven operational strategy. This strategy has been expanded

The Company distributes products for many of its key vendors in all of its geographic markets; however certain vendors only allow distribution to specific geographies. The Company’s key vendors in its worldwide POS and Barcode sales units include Bematech, Cisco, Datalogic, Datamax-O’Neil, Elo, Epson, Honeywell, Intermec, Motorola, NCR, Toshiba and Zebra Technologies. The Company’s key vendors in its worldwide communications sales units, including Catalyst Telecom, include Aruba, Avaya, Audiocodes, Cisco, Dialogic, Extreme Networks, Meru Networks, Plantronics, Polycom and ShoreTel. The Company’s key vendors in its security sales units include Arecont, Axis, Bosch, Cisco, Datacard, Exacq Technologies, Fargo, HID, March Networks, Panasonic, Ruckus Wireless, Samsung, Sony and Zebra Card.

Our distribution agreement with Juniper Networks ended in the first quarter of this fiscal year. Accordingly, sales of Juniper products, which were primarily distributed by our Catalyst Telecom sales unit in North America and to a lesser extent by ScanSource Communications Europe, have significantly declined in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to prior periods.

Our Latin America subsidiary is experiencing a significant drop in revenue in Venezuela due to increased country-specific risks. In Venezuela, the Company's transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars, however, our Venezuelan resellers are having difficulties getting U.S. dollars to pay us since the government controls the available U.S. dollars within the country. Hence, we have heightened risk of collectability in this country. At March 31, 2013, the Company held $3.2 million in accounts receivable and Europe.

Our objective$0.7 million in reserves specific to accounts receivable in this country.


The Company announced the restructuring of its Communications business unit in Europe to support a strategy for profitable growth. The new organizational structure will provide focused business unit leadership, as well as dedicated merchandising, sales and technical support teams, at a scale for profitable growth. In addition, the Company will move certain European support functions to centralized global teams in the United States to gain efficiencies.

The annualized cost savings in connection with the restructuring, principally associated with the elimination of positions, are estimated to be approximately $3.1 million. The Company incurred approximately $1.2 million in associated costs, including related severance expenses. These restructuring costs, which were accrued as of March 31, 2013, are included in selling, general and administration costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated income statements. The liability, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, is expected to be substantially utilized by the end of fiscal 2013.





18

Table of Contents

We are developing an Enterprise Resource Planning system (“ERP”) that is intended to be used globally and standardize our processes throughout the world. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Partner Services, Inc. (“PSI”), we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Atlanta, Georgia on January 2, 2013 against our former ERP software systems integration partner, Avanade, Inc. (“Avanade”). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, fraud, tortious misrepresentation and breach of contract on the part of Avanade in connection with its performance on the ERP project. PSI is seeking recovery of damages that it has incurred and will continue to grow profitable salesincur, as a result of Avanade's misconduct. The Company had engaged a new systems integration partner, Tata Consultancy Services (“TCS”), to replace Avanade.

In March 2013, TCS presented an integrated project plan that included the time and costs to complete the project. This plan indicated that the effort remaining was going to approach the $72 million upper end of our previously-disclosed total project cost range. We are currently evaluating our project plan. In April 2013, we moved a significant number of Company team members who were working on our ERP project back into business roles and are evaluating our alternatives for next steps. During the third quarter 2013, SG&A expenses included $2.3 million in ERP related costs including internal personnel costs. In the fourth quarter we expect to spend less than half of what we spent in the technologies we distribute. In doing so,third quarter. We have incurred approximately $41.4 million on the project from inception to date, which includes capital expenditures associated with the project of $28.6 million as of March 31, 2013. Meanwhile, our management team faceslegacy ERP systems continue to run our business successfully.
We face numerous challenges that require attention and resources. Certain of our business units and geographies are experiencing increased competition for the products we distribute. This competition may come in the form of pricing, credit terms, service levels, product availability and in some cases, changes from a closed distribution sales model, in which resellers must purchase exclusively from one distributor, to an open distribution sales model, in which resellers may choose to purchase from multiple distributors. As this competition could affect both our market share and pricing of our products, we may change our strategy in order to effectively compete.

We have continued investing in our international distribution segment, particularly in Europe, by temporarily accepting lower than normal returnscompete in the business in an effort to gain market share and customers. In the current quarter, our results in the international distribution segment were weaker than expected as the markets in Europe and Latin America seemed to contract and competitive pressures intensified. While certain international markets are volatile in the current macroeconomic environment, especially parts of Europe, we are continuing to invest in this business to position the Company favorably against our competitors.

We are in the process of the design and develop a new Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system that is intended to be used globally and provide operational efficiencies. We have recently received a project study from a third party service provider, which indicates that the project will take longer to implement and exceed our previously disclosed cost estimates. Based on this study, we have determined that the new system will not be implemented during calendar 2012, and we are developing the appropriate plans to move forward. During the year, we have consolidated the warehousing function of our German communications business into our Belgian operations. This consolidation gives us logistical efficiencies and service level advantages such as greater flexibility and scalability. We committed funds to Brazil to provide for future contingent consideration payments owed to the former shareholders of CDC, and we are continuously working to add new vendors and grow existing vendors in our various geographies. Also, we continue to evaluate strategic acquisitions to enhance our technological and geographic portfolios. This is our third full quarter of results with our most recent acquisition, CDC Brasil, S.A. (“CDC”). CDC is Brazil’s leading distributor of AIDC and POS solutions.

marketplace.


Evaluating Financial Condition and Operating Performance


We place a significant emphasis on operating income and returnReturn on invested capitalInvested Capital (“ROIC”) in evaluating and monitoring financial condition and operating performance. We use ROIC, a non-GAAP measure, to assess efficiency at allocating capital under our control to generate returns. ROIC is computed by the Company as earnings beforenet income plus interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) annualized by calendar days and divided by invested capital. Invested capital is defined as average equity plus daily average funded debt for the period.


The following table summarizes annualized return on invested capital ratio for the quarters ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011:

    Quarter ended March 31, 
   2012  2011 

Return on invested capital ratio, annualized

   13.5  18.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2012, respectively:

  
Quarter ended March 31,
 2013 2012
Return on invested capital ratio, annualized13.3% 13.5%

The discussion that follows this overview explains the change in ROIC from the comparative period. Management uses ROIC as a performance measurement because we believe this metric best balances our operating results with asset and liability management, excludes the results of capitalization decisions, is easily computed and communicatedunderstood, and drives changes in shareholder value. The components of this calculation and reconciliation to our financial statements are shown on the following schedule:

   Quarter ended March 31, 
   2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Reconciliation of EBITDA to net income:

  

Net income

  $14,756   $16,534  

Plus: income taxes

   7,049    8,530  

Plus: interest expense

   254    429  

Plus: depreciation & amortization

   2,754    1,395  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBITDA (numerator)

  $24,813   $26,888  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Invested capital calculations:

  

Equity – beginning of the quarter

  $616,103   $535,649  

Equity – end of the quarter

   642,450    562,072  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average equity

   629,277    548,861  

Average funded debt(1)

   111,247    51,129  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Invested capital (denominator)

  $740,524   $599,990  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Return on invested capital (annualized)(2)

   13.5  18.2


 Quarter ended March 31,
 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net income: 
Net income$13,978
 $14,756
Plus: income taxes7,202
 7,049
Plus: interest expense102
 254
Plus: depreciation & amortization2,274
 2,754
EBITDA (numerator)$23,556
 $24,813


19

Table of Contents

 Quarter ended March 31,
 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
Invested capital calculations: 
Equity – beginning of the quarter$696,960
 $616,103
Equity – end of the quarter709,912
 642,450
Average equity703,436
 629,277
Average funded debt (a) 
15,675
 111,247
Invested capital (denominator)$719,111
 $740,524
    
Return on invested capital (annualized)(b)
13.3% 13.5%
(1)
(a)Average funded debt is calculated as the daily average amounts outstanding on our revolvingshort-term and long-term debt facilities.interest-bearing debt.
(2)
(b)The annualized EBITDA amount is divided by days in the quarter times 365 days per year (366 during leap years). There were 90 and 91 days in the current year quarter and 90 days in the prior year quarter.quarters, respectively.


Our annualized return on invested capital was 13.5%13.3% for the quarter, down from 18.2% for13.5% in the same quarter of the prior year quarter.year. The decrease in EBITDA is largely the result of lower gross margins globallysales volumes and an increase in SG&A investment in Europe. Additionally,expenses related to bad debt expenses and the restructuring of our European operations.

Results of Operations

Currency

In this Management Discussion and Analysis, we make references to "constant currency," a non-GAAP performance measure, that excludes the foreign exchange rate impact from fluctuations in the weighted average foreign exchange rates between reporting periods. Certain financial results are adjusted by translating current year, we incurred a $1.1 million charge forperiod results from currencies other than the change in fair value ofU.S. dollar using the CDC earnout, which was not in prior year. In the prior year, we incurred a nonrecurring $2.4 million charge for the funding of a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”). Invested capital has grown significantlycomparable weighted average foreign exchange rates from the prior year quarter end. The increaseperiod. This information is partially attributableprovided to borrowings onview financial results without the revolving credit facility for the purchaseimpact of CDC and a $22 million cash transfer to our Brazilian subsidiary to pre-fund future earnout payments.

Results of Operations

fluctuations in foreign currency rates, thereby enhancing comparability between reporting periods.


Net Sales


The following table summarizes our net sales results (net of inter-segment sales) for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively:

   Quarter ended March 31,     
   2012   2011   $ Change   % Change 
   (in thousands)     

North American distribution

  $529,845    $462,047    $67,798     14.7

International distribution

   178,038     151,419     26,619     17.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales

  $707,883    $613,466    $94,417     15.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Nine months ended March 31,     
   2012   2011   $ Change   % Change 
   (in thousands)     

North American distribution

  $1,666,240    $1,479,247    $186,993     12.6

International distribution

   594,587     452,394     142,193     31.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales

  $2,260,827    $1,931,641    $329,186     17.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

On a comparative basis, worldwide net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 increased 15.4% to $707.9 million and 17.0% to $2.3 billion year-to-date. For the current quarter, our growth came from our sales units in North America and the addition

 Quarter ended March 31,  
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change
 (in thousands)  
North American distribution$508,394
 $529,845
 $(21,451) (4.0)%
International distribution174,571
 178,038
 (3,467) (1.9)%
Net sales$682,965
 $707,883
 $(24,918) (3.5)%
 Nine Months ended March 31,  
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change
 (in thousands)  
North American distribution$1,602,193
 $1,666,240
 $(64,047) (3.8)%
International distribution562,093
 594,587
 (32,494) (5.5)%
Net sales$2,164,286
 $2,260,827
 $(96,541) (4.3)%


20

Table of CDC, which was acquired April 15, 2011. For the year-to-date period, we’ve generated significant organic sales growth in North America and have benefitted greatly from incremental business in Brazil with the CDC acquisition.

Contents


North American Distribution


The North American distribution segment includesconsists of net sales to technology resellers in the United States and Canada that originate from our centralized distribution facility located in Southaven, Mississippi.Canada. For the quarter ended March 31, 2012,2013, net sales increased overdecreased $21.5 million or 4.0%. For the comparative prior year period by $67.8 million or 14.7%nine months ended March 31, 2013, and comparative net sales for the year-to-date period increased by $187.0decreased $64.0 million or 12.6%3.8%.


The North American distribution segment’s POS barcoding and securitybarcode product revenues have increased by 13.0%lines experienced modest growth in sales in the current three and 8.6% overnine month periods compared to the comparableprior year. Meanwhile, the ScanSource Security sales unit had high single digit year-over-year sales growth for the quarter, and nine months ended March 31, 2011, respectively. The increase in POS and barcoding products waslargely driven by big dealsvendors such as Ruckus Wireless and strong scanner sales. Additionally, we have continued to grow our security business with growth coming from video surveillance and wireless products.

Axis Communications.


The Company has two North American sales units that sell communications products to our customers the CatalystTelecom sales unit and the ScanSource Communications sales unit.ScanSource Communications. The combined net sales of these units increaseddecreased by 16.6% and 17.1% over10.3% from the comparableprior year quarter and 11.1% from the prior year nine months month period. These decreases were largely attributable to lower Avaya Enterprise and Juniper sales. Our distribution agreement with Juniper Networks ended March 31, 2011, respectively. Aruba, Juniper and ShoreTelin September 2012. These declines however, were partially offset by increased volumes with our wireless communications products were very strong this quarter, which further contributed to another quarter of double-digit growth in these sales units.with vendors such as Aruba.


International Distribution


The international distribution segment markets POS, AIDC, communications and security products in Latin America and POS, AIDC and communications products in Europe. For the quarter ended March 31, 2012,2013, net sales for this segment increaseddecreased by $26.6$3.5 million or 17.6%1.9% from the prior year quarter. On a constant currency basis, net sales were flat with the prior year quarter. Net sales were down in Europe from the prior year quarter primarily due to the loss of Juniper revenues and $142.2weaker deal volume in Germany, both of which affected our Communications business. Meanwhile, Latin America POS & Barcode business unit experienced a decrease in revenues from the prior year driven by difficulties in selling products in Venezuela and Argentina due to economic turmoil in both countries.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2013, net sales decreased by $32.5 million or 31.4% for the quarter and year-to-date periods, respectively.5.5%. The sales increasedecrease over the prior year quarter and nine monthsmonth period is largelyprimarily driven by the incremental sales in Brazil with the CDC acquisition. We have seen a decline in current quarter sales in both Latin America and Europe as larger projects seem to be delayed. Additionally, our European business has been experiencing pricing pressure as the economy has been struggling in recent months. For the quarter, foreign currency exchange fluctuationstranslation which had a $5.1$37.7 million unfavorable impact on our net sales. However, foreign exchange had a $4.3 million favorable impact on the year-to-date period from a weaker average exchangesales for the U.S. dollar against the euro. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuation, theperiod ended March 31, 2013. On a constant currency basis, net sales increaseincreased $5.2 million or 1% over the prior year nine month period. Our international segment's growth was 20.9%driven by contributions from our Brazilian and 30.5% for the quarter and nine months, respectively, mainly due to the acquisition of CDC.

other Latin American business units.


Gross Profit


The following tables summarize the Company’s gross profit for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively:

   Quarter ended March 31,   $ Change   % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012   2011      2012  2011 
   (in thousands)           

North American distribution

  $50,187    $48,512    $1,675     3.5  9.5  10.5

International distribution

   19,081     17,317     1,764     10.2  10.7  11.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  $69,268    $65,829    $3,439     5.2  9.8  10.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Nine months ended March 31,   $ Change   % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012   2011      2012  2011 
   (in thousands)           

North American distribution

  $164,176    $150,794    $13,382     8.9  9.9  10.2

International distribution

   64,021     49,143     14,878     30.3  10.8  10.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  $228,197    $199,937    $28,260     14.1  10.1  10.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Quarter ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
North American distribution$51,340
 $50,187
 $1,153
 2.3 % 10.1% 9.5%
International distribution17,492
 19,081
 (1,589) (8.3)% 10.0% 10.7%
Gross profit$68,832
 $69,268
 $(436) (0.6)% 10.1% 9.8%

 Nine Months ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
North American distribution$158,178
 $164,176
 $(5,998) (3.7)% 9.9% 9.9%
International distribution59,045
 64,021
 (4,976) (7.8)% 10.5% 10.8%
Gross profit$217,223
 $228,197
 $(10,974) (4.8)% 10.0% 10.1%






21


North American Distribution


Gross profit for the North American distribution segment increased 3.5%2.3% or $1.7$1.2 million and 8.9%decreased 3.7% or $13.4$6.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012,2013, respectively. As a percentage of net sales for the North American distribution segment, our gross profit decreased 103 basis pointsincreased to 9.5%10.1% from 9.5% in the comparativeprior year quarter and 34 basis pointsremained flat at 9.9% compared to 9.9% from the comparative year-to-dateprior nine month period. The decreaseincrease in margin percentage is mainlyprimarily due to changes in product and customer mix andas well as timing of vendor incentive programs.

programs compared to the prior year quarter.


International Distribution


In our international distribution segment, gross profit increased by 10.2%decreased 8.3% or $1.8$1.6 million and 30.3%7.8% or $14.9$5.0 million for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The increase in gross profit is primarily due2013, respectively, compared to the addition of CDC. Gross profit, expressed asprior periods. As a percentage of net sales for the international distribution segment, our gross profit decreased 72 basis points to 10.0% from 10.7% and 9 basis points to 10.8% over in the comparativeprior year quarter and year-to-date period, respectively. The decreaseto 10.5% from 10.8% in the current quarterprior nine month period. The decline in gross margin percentage is largelyprimarily due to weaker demand and competitive pricing pressure in Europe and Latin America, partially offset by higher margin percentage earned by CDC.

pressures.


Operating Expenses


The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively:
 Quarter ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
Selling, general and administrative expense$47,937
 $46,711
 $1,226
 2.6 % 7.0% 6.6%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration100
 1,072
 (972) (90.7)% 0.0% 0.2%
Operating expense$48,037
 $47,783
 $254
 0.5 % 7.0% 6.8%

 Nine Months ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
Selling, general and administrative expense$144,392
 $141,753
 $2,639
 1.9% 6.7% 6.3%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration1,396
 1,244
 152
 12.2% 0.1% 0.0%
Operating expense$145,788
 $142,997
 $2,791
 2.0% 6.7% 6.3%

Selling, general and administrative expense (“SG&A”) increased 2.6% or $1.2 million and 1.9% or $2.6 million for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A totaled 7.0% and 6.7% for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively, up from the prior nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

   Quarter ended March 31,   $ Change   % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012   2011      2012  2011 
   (in thousands)           

Selling, general and administrative expense

  $46,711    $40,349    $6,362     15.8  6.6  6.6

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

   1,072     —       1,072     100.0  0.2  0.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating expense

  $47,783    $40,349    $7,434     18.4  6.8  6.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Nine months ended March 31,   $ Change   % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012   2011      2012  2011 
   (in thousands)           

Selling, general and administrative expense

  $141,753    $116,071    $25,682     22.1  6.3  6.0

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

   1,244     —       1,244     100.0  0.0  0.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating expense

  $142,997    $116,071    $26,926     23.2  6.3  6.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative2012. SG&A expenses increased 15.8% or $6.4 million and 22.1% or $25.7for the March 2013 quarter included approximately $1.2 million for restructuring costs associated with our Communications business unit in Europe. In addition, SG&A expenses included increases to bad debt reserves, based on our evaluation of collectability of certain balances for Europe Communications and higher country-specific risk reserves in Venezuela. Accordingly, the quarter and nine months endedallowance for bad debts increased to $31.0 million at March 31, 2013 from $29.8 million at December 31, 2012, respectively.while accounts receivable declined. The primary drivers in the increase are the incremental expenses relatedcompared to CDC, additional headcount worldwide and continued investment in our international distribution segment. Conversely, the prior year quarternine months included a $2.4$2.1 million charge for the funding of the SERP.

in costs associated with tax compliance and personnel replacement costs in our Belgium office. These costs include severance benefits, as well as tax accruals and professional fees. These increased costs were partially offset by lower employee costs.


We have elected to present changes in fair value of the contingent consideration owed to the former shareholders of CDC separately from other selling, general and administrative expenses. In the current quarter and nine month periods, we have recorded a $1.1 million loss on the change in fair value adjustment losses of the contingent consideration. The loss is$0.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. These losses are primarily the result of the lapserecurring amortization of time in the discount period used for theunrecognized fair value calculation, as well as variance betweendiscount and changes in actual and forecasted results for fiscal 2012. For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred a $1.2 million loss for the change in fair value. The year-to-date loss is partially offset by the $0.7 million gain recorded in the December 2011 quarter as a resultresults.


22

Table of modifying projected revenues and operating expenses for CDC during the earnout period.

Contents


Operating Income

(Loss)


The following table summarizes our operating income (loss) for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively:

   Quarter ended March 31,   $ Change  % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012   2011     2012  2011 
   (in thousands)          

North American distribution

  $21,471    $20,089    $1,382    6.9  4.1  4.3

International distribution

   14     5,391     (5,377  -99.7  0.0  3.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $21,485    $25,480    $(3,995  -15.7  3.0  4.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Nine months ended March 31,   $ Change  % Change  % of Sales March 31, 
   2012   2011     2012  2011 
   (in thousands)          

North American distribution

  $77,501    $70,797    $6,704    9.5  4.7  4.8

International distribution

   7,699     13,069     (5,370  -41.1  1.3  2.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $85,200    $83,866    $1,334    1.6  3.8  4.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Quarter ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
North American distribution$24,973
 $21,471
 $3,502
 16.3 % 4.9 % 4.1%
International distribution(4,178) 14
 (4,192) (29,942.9)% (2.4)% 0.0%
 $20,795
 $21,485
 $(690) (3.2)% 3.0 % 3.0%
 Nine Months ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
North American distribution$73,216
 $77,501
 $(4,285) (5.5)% 4.6 % 4.7%
International distribution(1,781) 7,699
 (9,480) (123.1)% (0.3)% 1.3%
 $71,435
 $85,200
 $(13,765) (16.2)% 3.3 % 3.8%

For the North American distribution segment, operating income increased 6.9%16.3% or $1.4$3.5 million and 9.5%decreased 5.5% or $6.7$4.3 million for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012. In from the prior year quarter we incurred a $2.4 million charge to fund the SERP, contributing to the increase in operating income for the quarter. The increase year-to-date is driven by additional gross margin dollars related to increased net sales.and nine months, respectively. Operating income as a percentage of net sales increased to 4.9% and decreased to 4.1% and 4.7%4.6% for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012. For both comparable periods,2013, respectively. The increase in operating income percentage in North America for the current quarter is unfavorably affected byprimarily due to changes in product and customer mix as well as timing of vendor rebate programs and lower gross margin percentage described earlier.

bad debt expenses. The decrease for the current nine month period is due to lower sales volumes .


For the international distribution segment, operating income decreased $5.4losses totaled $4.2 million from the comparative prior year quarter and nine month period. The decrease is attributable to weaker results in the current quarter and a $0.4$1.8 million nonrecurring adjustment of amortization expense related to increased CDC intangible assets from the finalization of purchase accounting. The change in fair value of contingent consideration is included in this segment, in which we incurred losses of $1.1 million and $1.2 million for the current quarter and nine month periods, respectively. Our gross margins decreased from lower sales volume and pricing pressures as a result of economic volatility and competition in markets outside of Brazil. Also, selling, general and administrative expense is up in the international distribution segment from increased headcount, investment in our European business and the acquisition of CDC. As a percentage of sales, operating income decreased to 0.0% and 1.3% for the quarter and year-to-date period.nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively, compared with operating income for the prior year periods. The decreasedecreases internationally are primarily due to the increases in operating income percentage reflects pricing pressure in Europe,expenses described earlier. For the current quarter, decreases are primarily due to margin issues described above, higher operating expenses as we continue to invest in international marketsbad debt expense and the changerestructuring charges in fair value adjustmentthe European Communications business as well as lower pricing in certain geographies. Furthermore, the year-to-date operating income was also reduced by costs of $2.1 million for Belgian tax compliance and personnel replacement in the CDC contingent consideration.

second quarter fiscal 2013.


Total Other Expense (Income)


The following table summarizes our total other (income) expense (income) for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively:

   Quarter ended March 31,  $ Change  % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012  2011    2012  2011 
   (in thousands)          

Interest expense

  $254   $429   $(175  -40.8  0.0  0.1

Interest income

   (780  (313  (467  149.2  -0.0  -0.1

Net foreign exchange (gains) losses

   280    409    (129  -31.5  0.0  0.1

Other, net

   (74  (109  35    -32.1  -0.0  -0.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other (income) expense, net

  $(320 $416   $(736  -176.9  0.0  0.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Nine months ended March 31,  $ Change  % Change  

% of Net Sales

March 31,

 
   2012  2011    2012  2011 
   (in thousands)          

Interest expense

  $1,490   $1,182   $308    26.1  0.0  0.1

Interest income

   (2,233  (918  (1,315  143.2  -0.1  -0.0

Net foreign exchange (gains) losses

   3,571    745    2,826    379.3  0.2  0.0

Other, net

   (208  (253  45    -17.8  -0.0  -0.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other (income) expense, net

  $2,620   $756   $1,864    246.6  0.1  0.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Quarter ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
Interest expense$102
 $254
 $(152) (59.8)% 0.0 % 0.0 %
Interest income(483) (780) 297
 (38.1)% (0.1)% (0.0)%
Net foreign exchange (gains) losses145
 280
 (135) (48.2)% 0.0 % 0.0 %
Other, net(149) (74) (75) 101.4 % (0.0)% (0.0)%
Total other (income) expense, net$(385) $(320) $(65) 20.3 % (0.1)% 0.0 %

23

Table of Contents

 Nine Months ended March 31,     % of Net Sales
March 31,
 2013 2012 $ Change % Change 2013 2012
 (in thousands)      
Interest expense$356
 $1,490
 $(1,134) (76.1)% 0.0 % 0.0 %
Interest income(1,648) (2,233) 585
 (26.2)% (0.1)% (0.1)%
Net foreign exchange (gains) losses328
 3,571
 (3,243) (90.8)% 0.0 % 0.2 %
Other, net(294) (208) (86) 41.3 % (0.0)% (0.0)%
Total other (income) expense, net$(1,258) $2,620
 $(3,878) (148.0)% (0.1)% 0.1 %

Interest expense reflects interest incurred on borrowings from the Company’s revolving credit facility and other long-term debt agreements.borrowings, as well as non-utilization fees. Interest expense for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 was $0.3$0.1 million and $1.5$0.4 million, respectively. Interest expense iswas down 40.8%59.8% and 76.1% from the prior year quarter and nine months, respectively, largely from capitalizing a portion of our interest expense to our ERP project, included in property and equipmentdecreased borrowings on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. On October 11, 2011, we amended and restated our previous $250$300 million revolving credit facility.

Revolving Credit Facility.


Interest income for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 was $0.8$0.5 million and $2.2$1.6 million respectively. Interest income increased 149.2%, respectively, and 143.2% over the prior year quarter and nine month period, respectively. The increase is largely the result of interest earned on cash balances in Brazil from a $22 million capital infusion to fund future earnout payments to CDC’s former shareholders. As yields in Brazil are significantly higher than yields in the United States, we have been collecting significantly moreincludes interest income since the date of the funds transfer in September 2011. To a much lesser extent, interest income is generated on longer-term interest bearing receivables and interest earned on cash and cash-equivalent balances on hand outsidecash-equivalents. Interest income decreased 38.1% and 26.2% from the prior year quarter and nine months, respectively. In September 2011, we transferred $22 million to our Brazilian subsidiary to prefund a portion of Brazil.

the future earn-out payments and finance current operations. With the use of this cash for our annual earn-out payments for the purchase of CDC and short-term working capital needs in Brazil, interest income has declined.

Net foreign exchange gains and losses consist of foreign currency transactional and functional currency re-measurements, offset by net foreign currency exchange contract gains and losses. Foreign exchange losses and gains are generated as the result of fluctuations in the value of the euroBritish pound versus the British pound,euro, the U.S. dollar versus the euro, the U.S. dollar versus the Brazilian real, andthe Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar and other currencies versus other currencies.the U.S. dollar. While we utilize foreign exchange contracts and debt in non-functional currencies to hedge foreign currency exposure, our foreign exchange policy prohibits the use offor speculative transactions.

For the year-to-date period, the majority of


Net foreign exchange gains and losses were associated with exposures betweenfor the U.S. dollarquarter and Brazilian real.nine months ended March 31, 2013 totaled $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Compared to the prior year nine months, net foreign exchange loss decreased $3.2 million. In September 2011,the prior year, we incurred a $2.5 million non-recurring loss in conjunctionconnection with an unfavorable forward exchange contract to purchase Brazilian reais. In mid-August,August 2011, we decided to pre-fund a portion of the estimated earnout payments associated with the CDC acquisition.acquisition and finance current operations as mentioned above. This contract was designed to preserve the currency exchange for the few weeks required to transfer the cash to Brazil. From the time we entered into the contract through settlement, the real devalued from the contractual rate by 11.8%, ultimately resulting in a $2.5 million loss. Further contributing to the year-to-dateprior year quarter foreign exchange loss, theour Brazilian business incurred significant losses on the remeasurement of U.S. dollar denominated exposures in the first quartertransactions that were not hedged at the time. Subsequently, we have been including these exposures in our dailyongoing hedging activities.


Provision for Income Taxes

For the quarter and

Incomenine months ended March 31, 2013, income tax expense was $7.0$7.2 million and $28.1$24.7 million for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively. The effective tax rates for the same periods were 32.3% and 34.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the prior yearsame two periods was 34.0%. The effective tax rates in the quarter and prior year-to-date wasnine months ended March 31, 2012 were 32.3% and 34.0% and 35.2%, respectively. The decreaseincrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year period largely reflectsquarter is due primarily to a changing geographical mix of income to lower rate tax jurisdictions and a $0.4 million discrete tax benefit recognized during the current quarter.

Net Income

The following table summarizes our net income for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

   Period ended
March 31,
   $ Change  % Change  % of Net Sales
March 31,
 
   2012   2011     2012  2011 
   (in thousands)          

Quarter

  $14,756    $16,534    $(1,778  -10.8  2.1  2.7

Nine months

  $54,503    $53,862    $641    1.2  2.4  2.8

The decrease from the comparative quarter and increase in year-to-date net income is attributable to the changes in operations, as discussed above.

Acquisitions

On April 15, 2011, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ScanSource do Brasil Participações LTDA, completed its acquisition of 100% of the shares of CDC Brasil S.A, Brazil’s leading distributor of AIDC and POS solutions. CDC was a privately-held, value-added distributor that sold only to resellers. This acquisition gives the Company an established presence in Latin America’s largest specialty technology market and will allow the Company to more easily scale its Latin American operations.

We completed the purchase accounting for the acquisition this quarter. Please see Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements regarding the changes made during the quarter.

The acquisition was completed with an initial cash payment on the acquisition date with five remaining paymentscumulative adjustment in the formprior year quarter to reduce tax expense.



24


Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s


Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow from operations, borrowings under theour $300 million revolving credit facility secured and unsecured(the “Revolving Credit Facility”), borrowings under our industrial development revenue bond, and borrowings under our European subsidiary’s revolving credit facility.€6 million line of credit. As a distribution company, our business requires significant investment in working capital, particularly accounts receivable and inventory, partially financed through our accounts payable to vendors and revolving lines of credit. Overall, as our sales volume increases, our net investment in working capital needs typically increases,increase, which, in general, results in decreased cash flow from operating activities. Conversely, when sales volume decreases, our net investment in working capital needs typically decreases,decrease, which, in general, results in increased cash flow from operating activities.

The Company’s


Our cash and cash equivalent balance totaled $34.3$93.9 million at March 31, 2012,2013, compared to $28.7$29.2 million at June 30, 2011,2012, of which $30.6$24.1 million and $10.9$18.7 million were held outside of the United States as of March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011,2012, respectively. There was a significant increase in cash held outside of the United States due to a $22 million cash transfer to our Brazilian subsidiary to provide for future earnout payments to the former shareholders of CDC. We transferred the cash in September 2011 to our Brazilian subsidiary in order to mitigate foreign exchange rate risk.


Cash balances are generated and used in many locations throughout the world. The Company’s currentPrior to this quarter, management’s intent iswas to permanently reinvest these funds in our businesses outside the United States to continue to fund growth in our international operations. Furthermore,During the quarter, we reviewed and modified our current plans do not require repatriationpolicy toward permanently reinvested foreign earnings. Prospectively, the Company will provide for U.S. income taxes for the earnings of fundsits Canadian subsidiary.  Earnings from our international operationsall other geographies will continue to fund operations in the United States.be considered retained indefinitely for reinvestment. If these funds were needed in the operations inof the United States, the Companywe would be required to record and pay significant income taxes to the United States to repatriateupon repatriation of these funds.

Our working capital increased to $567.8 million at March 31, 2012

As mentioned above, our business model typically yields an inverse relationship between cash flows from $532.2 million at June 30, 2011. The $35.6 million change in working capital is primarily due to increased cashoperating activities and inventory and lower accounts payable, partially offset by lower accounts receivable. These working capital investments maintain our commitment to extend reasonable credit terms to our resellers as the channel continues to grow and to strategically stock inventory to accommodate anticipated reseller demand of our vendors’ products. In previous years, increased stock levels have been required due to product supply chain constraints, but more recently, increased levels of certain products have been maintained as their lead times continue to be long. Wesales volumes. Net sales are proactively working at reducing our inventory levels this quarter and have reduced inventory by $14.7down $96.5 million from the December quarter-end.

As of March 31, 2012, there was $41.5 million outstanding on the Company’s $300 million revolving credit facility. There were no borrowings on the Company’s €6 million revolving credit facility in Europe.

Our number of day’s sales in receivables (DSO) was 57 days at March 31, 2012, compared to 57 and 56 days in the sequential and comparative prior year quarters, respectively, whichnine month period. On a constant currency basis, net sales are within our normal rangedown $58.9 million. As a result, cash from operating activities increased to an inflow of expectations.

Inventory turned 5.0 times during the quarter, compared to 5.5 and 5.6 times$76.0 million versus an inflow of $25.1 million in the prior year and sequential quarters, respectively. We had 15 paid-for inventory days at March 31stnine, down from 18 days at the same time last year, and up from 11 days at the end of second quarter. Inventory levels are down $14.7 million from the sequential quarter. However, levels are still up $100.7 million from March 31, 2011, as the Company has built up inventory from vendor incentives over the three sequential quarters and longer lead times. We are continuing our efforts to properly size our inventory levels and reduce our carrying costs, without risking sales opportunities with our resellers. month period.

Cash provided by operating activities was approximately $25.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, compared to $1.5 million of cash used in the comparative prior year period. In the prior year, net sales were growing at a rate of 26% without the benefit of CDC, versus 17% in the current year with CDC. Prior year sales growth required higher net investment in working capital, which uses more cash in our operating activities. As sales growth has slowed compared to the prior year, our


Our net investment in working capital has slowed accordingly.

increased to $587.9 million at March 31, 2013 from $533.5 million at June 30, 2012 and increased compared to the March 31, 2012 balance of $567.8 million. Net working capital has increased $54.4 million since the June 30, 2012. The increase is largely attributable to increases in our cash balance generated by lower inventory, lower accounts receivable and payable levels due to lower sales. Our net investment in working capital is affected by several factors such as fluctuations in sales volume, net income before non-cash charges, timing of collections from customers, increases and decreases to inventory levels, payments to vendors as well as cash generated or used by other financing and investing activities.


The number of days sales in receivables (DSO) was 57 days at March 31, 2013, compared to 56 and 57 days at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively. Inventory turned 5.6 times during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013 versus 5.7 and 5.0 times in the sequential and prior year quarters.

We are in the process of the design and development ofdeveloping a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”)ERP system to standardize our processes throughout the world. The Company has spentand have incurred approximately $30.2$41.4 million on the project from inception through March 31, 2012.2013. Of the total spend, $24.7amount incurred, $28.6 million has been capitalized. We believe that the total spend will range from $58 million to $72 million, though this is currently under review. We expect to incur costs and expenses in connection with the implementation beyond 2013, however, we expect a significant reduction in these costs in the form of capital expenditures. We anticipate ERP spendfourth quarter 2013 while our project is under review.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Partner Services, Inc. (“PSI”) we filed a lawsuit in the quarter ended June 30, 2012U.S. District Court in Atlanta, Georgia on January 2, 2013 against our former ERP software systems integration partner, Avanade, Inc. (“Avanade”). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, fraud, tortious misrepresentation and breach of contract on the part of Avanade in connection with its performance on the ERP project, and PSI is seeking recovery of damages that it has incurred and will continue to be approximately $3.5 million. We have recently receivedincur, as a result of Avanade's misconduct. The Company had engaged a new systems integration partner, TCS, to replace Avanade. In March 2013, TCS presented an integrated project study from a third party service provider, which indicatesplan that included the time and costs to complete the project. This plan indicated that the effort remaining was going to approach the $72 million upper end of our previously-disclosed total project will take longercost range. We are currently evaluating our project plan. In April 2013, we moved a significant number of Company team members who were working on our ERP project back into business roles and are evaluating our alternatives for next steps. During the third quarter 2013, SG&A expenses included $2.3 million in ERP related costs including internal personnel costs. In the fourth quarter we expect to implement and exceedspend less than half of what we spent in the third quarter. Meanwhile, our previously disclosed cost estimates, which at the high end was $38.5 million. Based on the study, we have determined that the new system will not be implemented during calendar 2012, and we are developing the appropriate planslegacy ERP systems continue to move forward. The project is being financed with cash provided from operations andrun our revolving credit facility.

business successfully.


Cash used in investing activities for the quarternine months ended March 31, 20122013 was $10.2$4.5 million and $10.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The capital spending in both years is primarily related to ERP related expenditures.

In addition to our domestic revolving credit facility, the Company has a €6.0 million secured revolving credit facility utilized by our European operations which bears interest at the 30 day Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus a spread of 1.50% at March 31, 2012. At the quarter end, there was no outstanding balance on this facility,, compared to $3.2$10.2 million outstanding at June 30, 2011. This facility is secured by used in the assetsprior year period. Current and prior year investing cash flows are primarily attributable to the investment in our new ERP system.



25

Table of our European operations and is guaranteed by ScanSource, Inc.

Contents



On October 11, 2011, we refinanced the $250 million revolving credit facility, due on September 28, 2012. We entered into a five-year, $300 million multi-currency senior secured revolving credit facility pursuant to the terms of an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “New Credit“Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and a syndicate of lenders named therein. The New Credit Agreement allows for the issuance of up to $50 million for letters of credit and has a $150 million accordion feature that allows the Company to increase the availability to $450 million subject to obtaining commitments for the incremental capacity from existing or new lenders. We incurred $1.4 million in debt issuance costs that were capitalized to other assets, including identifiable intangible assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis through the maturity date of the New Credit Agreement on October 11, 2016.


At our option, loans denominated in U.S. dollars under the NewRevolving Credit Agreement,Facility, other than swingline loans, shall bear interest at a rate equal to a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or prime rate depending upon the Company’sour ratio of total debt (excluding accounts payable and accrued liabilities) to EBITDA,, measured as of the end of the most recent year or quarter, as applicable,to adjusted earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), for which financial statements have been delivered to the Lendersmost recently completed four quarters (the “Leverage Ratio”). The Leverage Ratio excludes the Company's subsidiary in Brazil. This spread ranges from 1.00% to 2.25% for LIBOR-based loans and 0.00% to 1.25% for prime rate-based loans. The spread in effect as of March 31, 2013 was 1.00% for LIBOR-based loans and 0.00% for Prime rate-based loans. Additionally, we are assessed commitment fees ranging from 0.175%to 1.25% for prime rate-based0.40%, depending upon the Leverage Ratio, on non-utilized borrowing availability, excluding swingline loans. Borrowings under the NewRevolving Credit AgreementFacility are guaranteed by substantially all of theour domestic assets of the Company as well as certain foreign subsidiaries determined to be material under the NewRevolving Credit AgreementFacility and a pledge of up to 65% of capital stock or other equity interest in each Guarantor (as defined in the New Credit Agreement).Guarantor. We were in compliance with all covenants under the credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2012.

We have significantly increased our borrowing activity on2013.


For the revolving credit facility. Amounts outstanding at the end of the quartersnine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $41.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively. We had $258.5 million and $247.9 million available for additional borrowings at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The average daily balance was $92.3 million and $9.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In the current nine month period, we have increased our usage of our revolving credit facility to support increased sales volumes, grant the appropriate credit to our resellers, expand our inventory levels to support longer lead times and capitalize on favorable vendor pricing. Additionally, we transferred $22 million to our Brazilian bank account in September 2011 in order to pre-fund future earnout payments to the previous shareholders of CDC. Timing of payments to vendors may cause temporary spikes in borrowings. These borrowings are generally repaid as soon as cash flow permits. Interest expense associated with these borrowings and the average outstanding daily debt are disclosed in more detail in the discussion of Total Other Expense (Income) and the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) calculation presented earlier in this report.

In the current nine months,2013, cash used in financing activities amounted to $7.4$6.8 million, in comparison with cash provided of $7.5to $7.4 million in the comparative prior year period. The change in cash used in financing activities is driven byprimarily attributable to less borrowing activity on our Revolving Credit Facility as a result of lower sales volumes and the prior year repayment of our $25$25.0 million unsecured note payable due on September 28, 2012 and the first installment paid on the CDC earnout of $2.0 million. These paymentspayable.


There were partially offset by increasedno outstanding borrowings on our $300 million revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2013and cash generated from the exercise of stock options.

June 30, 2012. On

a gross basis, we borrowed $1,133.0$515.3 million and repaid $515.9 million on our Revolving Credit Facility in the nine months ended March 31, 2013. In the prior year-to-date period, we borrowed $1,133.0 million and repaid $1,117.3 million and additionally paid $1.4 million of debt issuance costs. The average daily balance on the revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility was $12.5 million and $92.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no standby letters of credits issued and repaid $1,117.3outstanding as of March 31, 2013, leaving $300 million during the same period. available for additional borrowings.

In addition we paid $1.4to our Revolving Credit Facility, a subsidiary of the Company has a €6.0 million for debt issue costs in conjunction with line of credit, which is secured by the amendment and restatementassets of our revolvingEuropean operations and is guaranteed by ScanSource, Inc. This agreement can be withdrawn by the lender with minimal notice. Our subsidiary line of credit facility. In the prior year, we borrowed $433.6 million on the revolving credit facility and repaid $432.3 million during the comparative nine month period.

On January 4, 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $25 million and designated this instrument as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to variability in future cash flows with the associated note payable. Under the terms of the swap, we paid a fixed rate of 3.65% plus a fixed spread of 0.65% on the $25 million notional amount and received payments from a counterparty based on 30 day LIBOR plus a fixed spread of 0.65% for a term ending on September 28, 2011. On September 28, 2011, the interest rate swap expired and the fair value of the interest rate swap and accumulated other comprehensive income was reduced to zero. We have not entered into another interest rate swap since the expiration.

On August 1, 2007, we entered into an agreement with the State of Mississippi in order to provide financing for the acquisition and installation of certain equipment to be utilized at our Southaven, Mississippi distribution facility, through the issuance of an industrial development revenue bond. The bond matures on September 1, 2032 and accruesbears interest at the 30-day LIBOR rateEuro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus a spread ranging from 1.25% to 2.00% per annum. The spread in effect as of 0.85%March 31, 2013 was 1.25%. Additionally, we are assessed commitment fees ranging from 0.10% to 0.275% on non-utilized borrowing availability if outstanding balances are below €3.0 million. The termsinterest rate spread and commitment fee rates related to the €6.0 million line of credit refer to the bond allow for payment of interest only for the first 10 years of the agreement, and then, starting on September 1, 2018 through 2032, principal and interest payments are due until the maturity date or the redemption of the bond. TheLeverage Ratio as defined by our Revolving Credit Facility. There was no outstanding balance on this facility was $5.4 million as of at March 31, 2012,2013 and the effective interest rate$4.3 million was 1.09%outstanding at June 30, 2012. We were in compliance with all covenants associated with this agreement as of March 31, 2012.

On April 15,


In fiscal year 2011, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ScanSource do Brasil Participações LTDA, we completed the acquisition ofacquired all of the shares of CDC Brasil, S.A. The purchase price was partially paid on April 15, 2011, with an initial payment of $36.2 million, net of cash acquired, and assumption of working capital payables and debt, and variable annual payments through June 30,October 2015, based on CDC’sCDC's annual financial results. As of March 31, 2013, we have $13.3 million recorded for the contingent earnout obligation, of which $4.5 million is classified as current. Future contingent earnout payments will be funded by cash on hand and our existing revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2012, we have $19.7 million accrued for future earnout payments, of which $5.1 million is classified as current. Although there is no contractual limit, future undiscounted contingent consideration payments may range up to $31.7 million, based on our best estimate as the earnout is based on a multiple of adjusted earnings as defined in the Share Purchase and Sale Agreement.

Management believesRevolving Credit Facility.


We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, including cash resources and cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary with funds under the Company’sour credit agreements, will provide sufficient resources to meet the Company’s present and future working capital and cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.



26


Contractual Obligations

As discussed above, we amended our revolving credit facility by entering into the New Credit Agreement on October 11, 2011, and recently we have increased our borrowing activity on the revolving credit facility. Except with respect to these changes discussed in detail above, there


There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations and commitments as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of August 29, 2011, other than those which occur in the ordinary course of business.

24, 2012.


Accounting Standards Recently Issued

Effective for interim and annual reporting periods for fiscal 2013, we have implemented ASU 2011-05,

Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The objective of this update is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity or in a separate footnote and requires companies to present all non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. We are presenting a separate condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income.


Effective for the annual goodwill impairment testing during fiscal 2013, the Company will implement ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The amendments in the update permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have an impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This amendment allows companies to first assess qualitative factors of impairment of all indefinite-lived intangible assets, similar to the provisions in ASU 2011-08. The amendment becomes effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, but early adoption is permitted. The Company has elected early adoption for this amendment. The adoption of this amendment did not have an impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

There are currently no new accounting standards that have been issued that are expected to have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows upon adoption.




27


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those that are important to our financial condition and require management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Different amounts would be reported under different operating conditions or under alternative assumptions. We have evaluated the accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related notes and believe those policies to be reasonable and appropriate. See Note 1 of the Notes to condensed consolidatedConsolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 for a complete listing of our significant accounting policies.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized but is tested annually for impairment at a reporting unit level.  Additionally, goodwill is tested for impairment on an interim basis if at any time facts and circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. 

As discussed in Item 7 of the Company's 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K under Critical Accounting Policies, we performed our annual goodwill impairment test for the Brazilian reporting unit as of June 30, 2012 and found that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 7%.

We monitor results of this business on a quarterly basis, as missing estimated expectations or changes to the projected future results of this operation could result in a future impairment of goodwill for this reporting entity.  The business missed its projected results by a wider margin than expected during the March 31, 2013 quarter, however, based on current projected future results, we do not believe there is a more likely than not expectation that a goodwill impairment exists. The goodwill associated with the Brazilian testing unit as of March 31, 2013 is $19.9 million.

Recent financial statements.

results in Europe have generated pre-tax losses, primarily the result of our Europe Communications business. The overall European results as a goodwill testing unit could generate an impairment if this business unit continues to miss projected results. The goodwill associated with the European goodwill testing unit as of March 31, 2013 is $9.8 million.


Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


The Company’s principal exposure to changes in financial market conditions in the normal course of its business is a result of its selective use of bank debt and transacting business in foreign currencies in connection with its foreign operations.


Interest Rate Risk


The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of its borrowing activities, which include revolving credit facilities with a group of banks used to maintain liquidity and fund the Company’s business operations. The nature and amount of the Company’s debt maywill vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates on borrowings on the Company’s revolving credit facility, variable rate long termlong-term debt and subsidiary line of credit for the quarter ended March 31, 20122013 would have resulted in a $0.6$0.1 million increase or decrease, respectively, in pre-tax income for the period.

To


The Company evaluates its interest rate risk and may use interest rate swaps to mitigate the risk of interest rate fluctuations associated with the Company’sCompany's variable rate long-term debt,debt. At March 31, 2013, the Company had implemented anno interest rate risk management strategy that incorporated the use of an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge to minimize the significant unplanned fluctuationsswaps in earnings caused by interest rate volatility. The Company’s use ofplace. If used, derivative instruments hadhave the potential to expose the Company to certain market risks including the possibility of (1) the Company’s hedging activities not being as effective as anticipated in reducing the volatility of the Company’s cash flows, (2) the counterparty not performing its obligations under the applicable hedging arrangement, (3) the hedging arrangement being imperfect or ineffective, or (4) the terms of the swap or associated debt may change.changing. The Company soughtseeks to lessen such risks by establishinghaving established a policy to identify, control, and manage market risks which arosemay arise from changes in interest rates, as well as limiting its counterparties to major financial institutions. The interest rate swap expired on September 28, 2011, and was not renewed due to the subsequent payment of the related $25 million promissory note from funds obtained through the New Credit Agreement entered into on October 11, 2011.


Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk


The Company is exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from its foreign operations in Canada, Mexico, Brazil and Europe. These risks include the translation of functional currency balances of foreign subsidiaries, inter-company loans with foreign subsidiaries and transactions denominated in non-functional currencies.currencies and intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries. In the normal course of the business, foreign exchange risk is managed by the use of foreign currency forward contracts to hedge these exposures as well as balance sheet netting of exposures. In addition, exchange rate fluctuations may cause our international results to fluctuate significantly when translated into U.S. dollars. These risks may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material impact on the Company’s financial results in the future. In the normal course

28



The Company’s Board of Directors has approved a foreign exchange hedging policy to minimizereduce foreign currency exposure. The Company’s policy is to utilize financial instruments to reduce risks where internal netting cannot be effectively employed and not to enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company monitors its risk associated with the volatility of certain foreign currencies against its functional currencies and enters into foreign exchange derivative contracts to minimize short-term currency risks on cash flows. These positions are based uponon balance sheet exposures and, in certain foreign currencies, our forecasted purchases and sales denominated in certain foreign currencies.sales. The Company continually evaluates foreign exchange risk and may enter into foreign exchange transactions in accordance with its policy. Actual variances from these forecasted transactions can adversely impact foreign exchange results. Foreign currency gains and losses are included in other (income) expense.


The Company has elected not to designate its foreign currency contracts as hedging instruments, and therefore, the instruments are marked to marketmarked-to-market with changes in their values recorded in the condensed consolidated income statementsstatement each period. The underlying exposuresCompany's foreign currencies are denominated primarily in British pounds, euros, Mexican pesos, Brazilian real and Canadian dollars and Brazilian reais.dollars. At March 31, 2012,2013, the fair value of the Company’s currency forward contracts outstanding was a net payablereceivable of $0.3less than $0.1 million. The Company does not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.


29


Item 4.Controls and Procedures


An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and Principal Accounting Officer (“PAO”) of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012.2013. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO, CFO and CFO,PAO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2012.2013. During the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012,2013, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.



30


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1A.Risk Factors


The Company has updated the following risk factors to take into account recent developments relating to the Company's ongoing ERP project as well as changes governing international trade regulations and enhanced disclosure obligations that are generally applicable to all public companies with international operations.

In addition to the risk factors discussed below and in our other reports and statements that we file with the SEC, including our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended June 30, 20112012 and discussed in Part II, Item 1A. . “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quartersquarter ended September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011,2012, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or future operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and/or operating results. In the current quarter, we have modified two existing risk factors and added another risk factor regarding the design, development and implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system. Please see these risk factors below:

People – The departure, transition or replacement of key personnel could significantly impact results of our operations. If we cannot continue to hire and retain high quality employees, our business and financial results may be negatively affected.

Our operating results could be adversely affected by increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover, or increased salary and benefit costs. Like most businesses, our employees are important to our success and we are dependent in part on our ability to retain the services of our key management, sales, IT, operational, finance and administrative personnel. We have built our business on a set of core values and we attempt to hire employees who are committed to these values. We want to hire and retain employees who will fit our culture of providing exceptional service to our vendors and customers. In order to compete and to continue to grow, we must attract, retain, and motivate employees, including those in executive, senior management, sales, marketing, logistics, technical support and other operating positions.

Many of our employees work in small teams to provide specific services to vendors and customers. They are trained to develop their knowledge of vendor products, programs and practices, and customer business needs, as well as to enhance the skills required to provide exceptional service and to manage our business. As they gain experience and develop their knowledge and skills, our employees become highly desired by other businesses. Therefore, to retain our employees, we have to provide a satisfying work environment and competitive compensation and benefits. If our costs to retain our skilled employees increase, then our business and financial results may be negatively affected.

Our continued growth is also dependent, in part, on the skills, experience and efforts of our senior management, including but not limited to, Michael Baur, our Chief Executive Officer. We may not be successful in retaining the members of our senior management team or our other key employees. While we have entered into employment agreements with key executives and have obtained a key person life insurance policy on our CEO’s life, the loss of the services of Mr. Baur or any member of our senior management team could also have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Recent departures and retirement announcements of senior management has resulted in the transition of many management positions within our company. The process of identifying management successors creates uncertainty and could become a distraction to our senior management and the Board. We may not be successful in attracting qualified candidates to replace key positions when necessary. As a result, the transition process and the identification and recruitment of candidates to fill senior management positions may be disruptive to our business or operations.


Systems and the transition to a new Enterprise Resource Planning System - Our ability to manage our business and monitor results is highly dependent upon information and communication systems. A failure of these systems or thea new ERP implementationsystem could disrupt our business.


We are highly dependent upon a variety of internal computer and telecommunication systems to operate our business, including our enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) systems.

In order to continue support of our growth, we are making significant technological upgrades to our information systems. We are in the process of implementingdeveloping a company-wide, single ERP software system and related processes to perform various functions and improve on the efficiency of our global business. This is a lengthy and expensive process that has and will continue to result in a diversion of resources from other operations. Continued execution of theWe had engaged a new systems integration partner, Tata Consultancy Services (“TCS”). In March 2013, TCS presented an integrated project plan or a divergence from it, may result inthat included the time and costs to complete the project. This plan indicated that the effort remaining was going to approach the $72 million upper end of our previously-disclosed total project cost overruns, project delays or business interruptions. In addition, divergence fromrange. We are currently evaluating our project plan could impactplan. In April 2013, we moved a significant number of Company team members who were working on our ERP project back into business roles and are evaluating our alternatives for next steps. These actions will reduce our ERP costs for the timing and/or extent of benefits we expectfourth quarter. Meanwhile, our legacy ERP systems continue to achieve from the system and process efficiencies.

run our business successfully.


Any continued disruptions, delays or deficiencies in the design and/or implementation of the new ERP system, or in the performance of our legacy systems, particularly any disruptions, delays or deficiencies that impact our operations, could adversely affect our ability to effectively run and manage our business and potentially for our customers to access our price and product availability information. Further, as we are dependent upon our ability to gather and promptly transmit accurate information to key decision makers, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected if our information systems do not allow us to transmit accurate information, even for a short period of time. Failure to properly or adequately address these issues could impact our ability to perform necessary business operations, which could adversely affect our reputation, competitive position, business, results of operations and financial condition.


In addition, the information systems of companies we acquire may not be sufficient to meet our standards or we may not be able to successfully convert them to provide acceptable information on a timely and cost-effective basis. Furthermore, we must attract and retain qualified people to operate our systems, expand and improve them, integrate new programs effectively with our existing programs, and convert to new systems efficiently when required. Any disruption to our business due to such issues, or an increase in our costs to cover these issues that is greater than what we have anticipated, could have an adverse affect on our financial results and operations.


Our customers rely increasingly on our electronic ordering and information systems as a source for product information, including availability and pricing. There can be no assurance that our systems will not fail or experience disruptions, and any significant failure or disruption of these systems could prevent us from making sales, ordering and delivering products and otherwise conducting our business. Many of our customers use our website to check real-time productsproduct availability, see their customized pricing and to place orders. The Internet and individual websites have experienced a number of disruptions and slowdowns. In addition, some websites have experienced security breakdowns. While our website has not experienced any material disruptions or security breakdowns, any disruptions or breaches in security or a breach that compromises sensitive information could harm our relationship with our vendors, customers and other business partners. Any material disruption of our website or the Internet in general could impair our order processing or prevent our vendors and customers from accessing information and cause us to lose business.



31


Additional costs, cost overruns and delays with implementation ofa new ERP system –Significant- Significant additional costs, cost overruns and delays in connection with the implementation of oura new ERP systempartner or a new project plan may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The implementation of our


Our new ERP system has and will continue to involve substantial expenditures on system hardware and software, as well as design, development and implementation activities. We have experienced cost overruns and project delays in connection with the implementation process. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Partner Services, Inc. (“PSI”) we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Atlanta, Georgia on January 2, 2013 against our former ERP software systems integration partner, Avanade, Inc. (“Avanade”). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, fraud, tortious misrepresentation and breach of contract on the part of Avanade in connection with its performance on the ERP project, and PSI is seeking recovery of damages that it has incurred and will continue to incur, as a result of Avanade's misconduct. We are currently evaluating our current project plan. Until the new ERP system is fully implemented, we expect to incur additional selling, general and administrative expenses and capital expenditures to implementdevelop and test the system, and theresystem. There can be no assurance that other issues relating to the new ERP system will not occur or be identified.occur. Our business and results of operations mayhave been and will continue to be adversely affected if we experience operating problems, additional costs, unanticipated litigation costs and expenses, or cost overruns during the ERP implementation process, or ifprocess. To the extent that the ERP project can not be completed in a timely and cost efficient manner, or there are significant problems with the transition to a new ERP system, the asset may be impaired. The capitalized balance as of March 31, 2013 was $28.6 million.

International operations - Our international operations expose us to risks that are different from, or possibly greater than, the risks we are exposed to domestically.

We currently have facilities in eight countries outside the United States and sell products in a number of others. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from our international operations. These operations are subject to a variety of risks that are in addition to the associated processrisks that we face domestically or are similar risks but with potentially greater exposure. These risks include:

Changes in international trade laws, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, affecting our import and export activities, including export license requirements, restrictions on the export of certain technology, and tariff changes;
Difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
Changes in, or expiration of, various foreign incentives that provide economic benefits to us;
Changes in labor laws and regulations affecting our ability to hire and retain employees;
Difficulties in staffing and managing operations in foreign countries;
Fluctuations of foreign currency, exchange controls and currency devaluations;
Changes in the interpretation and enforcement of laws (in particular related to items such as duty and taxation);
Potential political and economic instability and changes significantly.

in governments;

Compliance with foreign and domestic import and export regulations and anti-corruption laws, including the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or similar laws of other jurisdictions for our business activities outside the U.S., the violation of which could result in severe penalties including monetary fines, criminal proceedings and suspension of export privileges;
Terrorist or military actions that result in destruction or seizure of our assets or suspension or disruption of our operations or those of our customers;
Potential regulatory changes, including foreign environmental restrictions; and
Different general economic conditions.

The potential criminal penalties for violations of export regulations and anti-corruption laws, particularly the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, data privacy laws and environmental laws and regulations in many jurisdictions, create heightened risks for our international operations. In the event that a governing regulatory body determined that we have violated applicable export regulations or anti-corruption laws, we could be fined significant sums, incur sizable legal defense costs and/or our export capabilities could be restricted, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business and reputation.

Because we have operations in Brazil, Canada, Mexico and Europe, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We manage our exposure to fluctuations in the value of currencies using various derivative instruments. However, we may not be able to mitigate all foreign currency related risk. In addition, exchange rate fluctuations may cause our international results to fluctuate significantly when translated into U.S. dollars. Developing economies, such as Brazil, could have sudden and drastic changes in foreign exchange rates compared to others.

In addition, in foreign markets we are more dependent upon third party providers of key services, such as third party freight forwarders and third party warehouses in Europe and Latin America. We also rely on third party legal advisors to provide guidance on trade compliance issues and information systems providers to provide services related to denied party screening. Adverse changes in any of these third party services could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. As we expand our international operations, we expect these risks to increase.

32


In addition, the value of our equity investment in foreign countries may fluctuate based on changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These fluctuations may result in losses in the event a foreign subsidiary is sold or closed at a time when the foreign currency is weaker than when we initially invested.


33


Item 6.Exhibits

Exhibit

Number

Description

  31.1Item 6.Exhibits

Exhibit
Number
Description
 
31.1Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012,2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011;2012; (ii) the condensed consolidated income statements for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011;2012; (iii) the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012; (iv) the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011;2012; and (iv)(v) the Notesnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements **statements.

**Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.



34


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 ScanSource, Inc.
 
 SCANSOURCE, INC./s/ MICHAEL L. BAUR

/s/ Michael L. Baur

 Michael L. Baur
Date:May 9, 20122, 2013

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


 /s/ CHARLES A. MATHIS
 

/s/ Richard P. Cleys

Richard P. CleysCharles A. Mathis
Date:May 9, 20122, 2013

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


/s/ GERALD LYONS
Gerald Lyons
Date:May 2, 2013
Senior Vice President of Finance and Principal Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)


35


EXHIBIT INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q


Exhibit

Number

Description

  31.1
Exhibit
Number
Description
 
31.1Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101
The following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012,2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 20122013 and June 30, 2011;2012; (ii) the condensed consolidated income statements for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011;2012; (iii) the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012; (iv) the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 20122013 and 2011;2012; and (iv)(v) the Notesnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements **statements.

**Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

34




36