UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2012

or

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 000-04065

 

 

Lancaster Colony Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Ohio 13-1955943

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

37 West Broad Street

Columbus, Ohio

 

43215

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

614-224-7141

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large acceleratedAccelerated filer x  Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting companyReporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of April 26,October 24, 2012, there were approximately 27,282,00027,298,000 shares of Common Stock, without par value, outstanding.

 

 

 


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  3

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):

   3  

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31,September 30, 2012 and June 30, 20112012

   3  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income – Three and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2012 and 2011

   4  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsComprehensive IncomeNineThree Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2012 and 2011

   5  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

   67  

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   1514  

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   2119  

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

   2119  

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

  20

Item 1A. Risk Factors

   2220  

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

   2220  

Item 6. Exhibits

   2220  

SIGNATURES

   2321  

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

   2422  

2


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

 

  March 31 June 30   September 30, June 30, 

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

  2012 2011   2012 2012 
ASSETS   ASSETS  

Current Assets:

      

Cash and equivalents

  $167,960   $132,266    $192,676   $191,636  

Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, March-$694; June-$570)

   86,495    63,762  

Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, September-$744; June-$678)

   96,053    73,326  

Inventories:

      

Raw materials

   37,283    36,785     37,102    36,005  

Finished goods and work in process

   63,001    75,100     83,628    73,699  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total inventories

   100,284    111,885     120,730    109,704  

Deferred income taxes and other current assets

   24,021    25,283     17,292    17,073  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   378,760    333,196     426,751    391,739  

Property, Plant and Equipment:

      

Land, buildings and improvements

   140,291    141,175     142,096    140,337  

Machinery and equipment

   273,179    263,449     279,953    276,951  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total cost

   413,470    404,624     422,049    417,288  

Less accumulated depreciation

   229,453    219,342     236,830    233,158  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Property, plant and equipment—net

   184,017    185,282  

Property, plant and equipment-net

   185,219    184,130  

Other Assets:

      

Goodwill

   89,840    89,840     89,840    89,840  

Other intangible assets—net

   7,515    8,350  

Other intangible assets-net

   7,031    7,267  

Other noncurrent assets

   5,942    5,421     9,480    9,659  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

  $666,074   $622,089    $718,321   $682,635  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  

Current Liabilities:

      

Accounts payable

  $43,489   $42,570    $45,326   $40,708  

Accrued liabilities

   37,360    33,586     46,189    31,963  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   80,849    76,156     91,515    72,671  

Other Noncurrent Liabilities

   13,767    13,646     30,857    31,627  

Deferred Income Taxes

   18,928    14,748     13,988    14,070  

Shareholders’ Equity:

      

Preferred stock—authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding—none

   

Common stock—authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding—March—27,282,132 shares; June—27,385,781 shares

   99,141    97,197  

Preferred stock-authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding-none

   

Common stock-authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding - September-27,297,556 shares; June-27,286,861 shares

   100,768    100,015  

Retained earnings

   1,191,895    1,150,683     1,224,864    1,208,027  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (6,893  (7,043   (12,058  (12,162

Common stock in treasury, at cost

   (731,613  (723,298   (731,613  (731,613
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   552,530    517,539     581,961    564,267  
  

 

  

 

   

 

 ��

 

 

Total

  $666,074   $622,089    $718,321   $682,635  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

 

  Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended   Three Months Ended 
  March 31   March 31   September 30, 

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

  2012   2011   2012   2011   2012   2011 

Net Sales

  $271,098    $252,623    $857,400    $833,912    $290,976    $274,516  

Cost of Sales

   217,296     200,089     678,309     645,063     225,259     219,086  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross Margin

   53,802     52,534     179,091     188,849     65,717     55,430  

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

   25,848     23,060     74,915     72,441     25,145     22,918  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Operating Income

   27,954     29,474     104,176     116,408     40,572     32,512  

Other Income:

        

Other income—Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

   —       —       2,701     961  

Interest income and other—net

   39     54     73     149  

Interest Income and Other-Net

   14     (4
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income Before Income Taxes

   27,993     29,528     106,950     117,518     40,586     32,508  

Taxes Based on Income

   9,771     10,087     37,097     40,447     13,924     11,250  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net Income

  $18,222    $19,441    $69,853    $77,071    $26,662    $21,258  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net Income Per Common Share:

            

Basic and Diluted

  $.67    $.71    $2.56    $2.77    $0.98    $0.78  

Cash Dividends Per Common Share

  $.36    $.33    $1.05    $.96    $0.36    $0.33  

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:

            

Basic

   27,216     27,494     27,237     27,755     27,229     27,290  

Diluted

   27,251     27,520     27,268     27,781     27,264     27,314  

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

4CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


(UNAUDITED)

   Three Months Ended 
   September 30, 

(Amounts in thousands)

  2012  2011 

Net Income

  $26,662   $21,258  

Other Comprehensive Income:

   

Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans:

   

Amortization of loss, before tax

   167    81  

Amortization of prior service asset, before tax

   (1  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Other Comprehensive Income, Before Tax

   166    80  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax Attributes of Items in Other Comprehensive Income:

   

Amortization of loss, tax

   (62  (30

Amortization of prior service asset, tax

   —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Other Comprehensive Income, Tax

   (62  (30
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax

   104    50  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income

  $26,766   $21,308  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

 

  

Nine Months Ended

March 31

   Three Months Ended
September 30,
 

(Amounts in thousands)

  2012 2011   2012 2011 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

      

Net income

  $69,853   $77,071    $26,662   $21,258  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

   15,158    14,469     4,964    5,038  

Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes

   6,355    5,643     (1,466  3,150  

(Gain) / loss on sale of property

   (16  14  

Stock-based compensation expense

   871    554  

Gain on sale of property

   (1  —    

Pension plan activity

   (1,095  (1,442   (15  (1,040

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

      

Receivables

   (22,869  (10,803   (23,260  (21,408

Inventories

   11,601    17,388     (11,026  1,637  

Other current assets

   1,088    (2,231   727    4,762  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   5,088    (2,081   18,902    3,612  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   85,163    98,028     16,358    17,563  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

      

Payments on property additions

   (12,178  (26,857   (5,434  (4,278

Proceeds from sale of property

   385    19     1    —    

Other – net

   (913  207  

Other-net

   (302  (394
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (12,706  (26,631   (5,735  (4,672
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

      

Purchase of treasury stock

   (8,315  (39,564   —      (7,890

Payment of dividends

   (28,641  (26,640   (9,825  (9,008

Proceeds from the exercise of stock awards, including tax benefits

   193    269  

Increase in cash overdraft balance

   —      1,350  

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   242    5  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (36,763  (64,585   (9,583)   (16,893
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net change in cash and equivalents

   35,694    6,812     1,040    (4,002

Cash and equivalents at beginning of year

   132,266    100,890     191,636    132,266  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash and equivalents at end of period

  $167,960   $107,702    $192,676   $128,264  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Operating Cash Flows:

      

Cash paid during the period for income taxes

  $30,187   $37,821    $390   $728  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1 –Summary– Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and SEC Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position for such periods. All such adjustments reflected in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements are considered to be of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 20112012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise noted, the term “year” and references to a particular year pertain to our fiscal year, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30; for example, 20122013 refers to fiscal 2012,2013, which is the period from July 1, 20112012 to June 30, 2012.

Subsequent Events

On April 18, 2012, we entered into a new unsecured credit agreement, which replaced the existing credit agreement. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for information about this transaction and our new credit facility.2013.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable are as follows:

   March 31
2012
   March 31
2011
 

Construction in progress in accounts payable

  $244    $172  

These purchases, less the preceding June 30 balances, have beenand excluded from the property additions and the change in accounts payable in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.Flows were as follows:

   September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Construction in progress in accounts payable

  $721    $1,843  

Held for Sale

As a result of various prior-yearsprior-years’ restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain “held for sale” properties with a total net book value of approximately $2.8$2.2 million at March 31,September 30, 2012. This balance isWe have classified approximately $0.1 million of these “held for sale” assets as current assets and they are included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other NoncurrentCurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining balance of approximately $2.1 million is included in Other Noncurrent Assets. In accordance with GAAP for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating these “held for sale” assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.

Accrued Distribution

Accrued distribution costs included in accrued liabilities were approximately $5.8 millionsale and $3.9 million at March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively.evaluated for potential impairment.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights) outstanding during each period. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to employees are considered participating securities since employees receive nonforfeitable dividends prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the two-class method. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which includes the dilutive potential common shares associated with restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights.

 

6


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:

 

   

Three Months

Ended

March 31

  

Nine Months

Ended

March 31

 
   2012  2011  2012  2011 

Net income

  $18,222   $19,441   $69,853   $77,071  

Net income available to participating securities

   (36  (25  (125  (109
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

  $18,186   $19,416   $69,728   $76,962  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic

   27,216    27,494    27,237    27,755  

Incremental share effect from:

     

Restricted stock

   2    3    4    5  

Stock-settled stock appreciation rights

   33    23    27    21  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted

   27,251    27,520    27,268    27,781  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per common share – basic and diluted

  $.67   $.71   $2.56   $2.77  

Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 was approximately $18.3 million and $70.0 million, respectively. Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $19.5 million and $77.3 million, respectively. The March 31, 2012 and 2011 comprehensive income consists of net income and pension and postretirement amortization.

   Three Months Ended 
   September 30, 
   2012  2011 

Net income

  $26,662   $21,258  

Net income available to participating securities

   (53  (27
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

  $26,609   $21,231  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

   27,229    27,290  

Incremental share effect from:

   

Restricted stock

   5    6  

Stock-settled stock appreciation rights

   30    18  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

   27,264    27,314  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per common share—basic and diluted

  $0.98   $0.78  

Significant Accounting Policies

There were no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies from those disclosed in our 20112012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Note 2 – Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)There were no recently issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 11-12”). This ASU indefinitely defers the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income as set forth in ASU No. 2011-05,“Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 11-05”). ASU 11-12 has the same effective date as the unaffected provisions of ASU 11-05, for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a materialaccounting pronouncements that impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 11-05. This ASU amends current comprehensive income guidance to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05 will be effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. As noted above, portions of this ASU relating to reclassifications were indefinitely deferred with the issuance of ASU 11-12. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-09, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Multiemployer Plans: Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan” (“ASU 11-09”). This ASU requires that employers provide additional separate quantitative and qualitative disclosures for multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. ASU 11-09 will be

7


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 11-08”). This ASU permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 3 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at March 31,September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011.2012.

The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets, all included in the Specialty Foods segment:

 

  March 31 June 30   September 30, June 30, 
  2012 2011   2012 2012 

Trademarks (40-year life)

      

Gross carrying value

  $370   $370    $370   $370  

Accumulated amortization

   (193  (186   (198  (196
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Carrying Value

  $177   $184    $172   $174  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life)

      

Gross carrying value

  $13,020   $13,020    $13,020   $13,020  

Accumulated amortization

   (5,693  (4,991   (6,161  (5,927
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Carrying Value

  $7,327   $8,029    $6,859   $7,093  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Non-compete Agreements (5 to 8-year life)

   

Gross carrying value

  $1,540   $1,540  

Accumulated amortization

   (1,529  (1,403
  

 

  

 

 

Net Carrying Value

  $11   $137  
  

 

  

 

 

Total Net Carrying Value

  $7,515   $8,350    $7,031   $7,267  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Amortization expense relating to these assets was as follows:

   

Three Months

Ended

March 31

   

Nine Months

Ended

March 31

 
   2012   2011   2012   2011 

Amortization expense

  $253    $291    $835    $873  

8


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

Amortization expense relating to these assets was as follows:

   Three Months Ended 
   September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Amortization expense

  $236    $291  

Total annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be as follows:

 

2013

  $946  

2014

  $946    $ 946  

2015

  $946    $946  

2016

  $775    $775  

2017

  $604    $604  

2018

  $604  

Note 4 – Long-Term Debt

At March 31,September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011,2012, we had an unsecured revolving credit facilityagreement under which we could borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time, with the potential to expand the total credit availability to $260 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing bank and certain other conditions. At March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. At March 31, 2012, we had approximately $6.7 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility. We paid no interest for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. At March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins. At March 31, 2012, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.

On April 18, 2012, we entered into a new unsecured credit agreement (“New Credit Agreement”) with the Lenders named in the New Credit Agreement and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent. The New Credit Agreement replaced the facility discussed above. The material terms of the New Credit Agreement are substantially similar to the terms of our previous credit agreement, except with respect to maturity, interest rate margins and fees.

The New Credit Agreement provides that we may borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $120 million at any one time, with potential to expand the total credit availability to $200 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing banks and certain other conditions. The New Credit Agreementfacility expires on April 18, 2017, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the New Credit Agreement,credit agreement, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. Based on the long-term nature of this facility, when we have outstanding borrowings under this facility, we will classify the outstanding balance as long-term debt.

At September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $3.4 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing under the credit agreement. We paid no interest for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. At September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of this facility, and we exceeded the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins. At September 30, 2012, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.

The New Credit Agreementfacility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions. There are two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as defined more specifically in the New Credit Agreement)credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined more specifically in the New Credit Agreement)credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the New Credit Agreement)credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as defined more specifically in the New Credit Agreement).credit agreement.)

Note 5 – Pension Benefits

We and certain of our operating subsidiaries have sponsored multiple defined benefit pension plans covering union workers at certain locations. As a result of restructuring activities in recent years, we no longer have any active employees continuing to accrue service cost or otherwise eligible to receive plan benefits. Benefits being paid under the plans are primarily based on negotiated rates and years of service. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount required by regulation.

9


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit costincome for our pension plans:

 

  

Three Months

Ended

March 31

 

Nine Months

Ended

March 31

   Three Months Ended 
  2012 2011 2012 2011   September 30, 

Components of net periodic benefit cost

     
  2012 2011 

Components of net periodic benefit income

   

Interest cost

  $483   $487   $1,449   $1,461    $408   $483  

Expected return on plan assets

   (599  (507  (1,797  (1,521   (595  (599

Amortization of unrecognized net loss

   89    136    267    410     172    89  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net periodic benefit (income) cost

  $(27 $116   $(81 $350  

Net periodic benefit income

  $(15 $(27
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2012, we made no pension plan contributions totaling zero and approximately $1.0 million, respectively. Wewe do not expect to make any further contributions to our pension plans during the remainder of 2012.2013.

Note 6 – Postretirement Benefits

We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service. Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred.

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans:

 

  Three Months Ended 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31
 Nine Months
Ended
March 31
   September 30, 
  2012 2011 2012 2011   2012 2011 

Components of net periodic benefit cost

        

Service cost

  $6   $6   $18   $18    $8   $6  

Interest cost

   37    34    111    102     28    37  

Amortization of unrecognized net gain

   (8  (12  (24  (36   (5  (8

Amortization of prior service asset

   (1  (1  (3  (3   (1  (1
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $34   $27   $102   $81    $30   $34  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2012, we made approximately $40,000 and $106,000, respectively,$22,000 in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We expect to make approximately $0.1 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans during the remainder of 2012.2013.

Note 7 – Stock-Based Compensation

Our shareholders approved the adoption of and subsequent amendments to the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005 Plan will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies as to the type of award granted, but generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.

Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

We use periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSSARs”) as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSARs exercise from new shares that had been previously authorized. There were no

10


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

In Februarygrants of SSSARs during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we grantedand no SSSARs to various employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The following table summarizes information relating to each ofvested during these grants:

   2012  2011 

SSSARs granted

   185    94  

Weighted average fair value per right

  $9.08   $10.12  

Assumptions used in fair value calculations:

   

Risk-free interest rate

   0.41  1.27

Dividend yield

   2.11  2.28

Volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock

   24.31  28.78

Weighted average expected life in years

   2.76    3.11  

Estimated forfeiture rate

   4.00  4.00

For each of these grants, the volatility factor was estimated based on actual historical volatility of our stock for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The expected average life was determined based on historical exercise experience for this type of grant. The SSSARs from each of these grants vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date.periods.

We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation costexpense was reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and was allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to SSSARs. These windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes SSSARs compensation expense and tax benefits recorded:

 

   

Three Months

Ended

March 31

   

Nine Months

Ended

March 31

 
   2012   2011   2012   2011 

Compensation expense

  $453    $289    $1,099    $843  

Tax benefits

  $159    $101    $385    $295  

Intrinsic value of exercises

  $138    $326    $281    $344  

Gross windfall tax benefits

  $58    $117    $122    $123  

The total fair values of SSSARs vested are as follows:

   

Nine Months Ended

March 31

 
   2012   2011 

Fair value of vested rights

  $1,107    $1,095  

11


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

   Three Months Ended 
   September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Compensation expense

  $461    $280  

Tax benefits

  $161    $98  

Intrinsic value of exercises

  $690    $13  

Gross windfall tax benefits

  $241    $5  

The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012:

 

  Number
of
Rights
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
   Number of
Rights
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   324   $53.98         446   $60.55      

Exercised

   (41 $51.10         (51 $50.06      

Granted

   185   $68.12         —     $—        

Forfeited

   (1 $58.79         —     $—        
  

 

        

 

      

Outstanding at end of period

   467   $59.82     3.71    $3,403     395   $61.90     3.48    $4,483  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exercisable and vested at end of period

   167   $51.71     2.58    $2,459     93   $53.99     2.30    $1,786  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Vested and expected to vest at end of period

   455   $59.71     3.69    $3,371     384   $61.82     3.44    $4,388  
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

At March 31,September 30, 2012, there was approximately $2.5$1.5 million of unrecognized compensation costexpense related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.271.88 years.

Restricted Stock

We use periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.

In February There were no grants of restricted stock during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we granted shares ofand no restricted stock to various employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The following table summarizes information relating to each of these grants:

   2012  2011 

Restricted stock granted

   25    7  

Grant date fair value

  $1,693   $390  

Closing stock price on grant date

  $68.12   $57.78  

Estimated forfeiture rate

   4.00  4.00

The restricted stock under each of these grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. Under the terms of the grants, employees receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of their vesting status. An additional 5,650 shares of restricted stock that were granted to various employees in February 2009 vested during the third quarter of 2012.

In November 2011, we granted a total of 7,427 shares of restricted stock to our seven nonemployee directors under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of approximately $0.5 million based on a per share closing stock price of $65.97. This restricted stock vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest. Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period will be paid to the directors at the time the stock vests. Compensation expense related to the restricted stock award will be recognized over the requisite service period. An additional 8,155 shares of restricted stock that were granted to our seven nonemployee directors in November 2010 vested during the second quarter of 2012, and the directors were paid the related dividends.periods.

We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation costexpense was reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and was allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to restricted stock. Windfall tax benefits, if any, were included in the financing section of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

12


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

section of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes restricted stock compensation expense and tax benefits recorded:

 

   

Three Months Ended

March 31

   

Nine Months Ended

March 31

 
   2012   2011   2012   2011 

Compensation expense

  $343    $270    $892    $906  

Tax benefits

  $120    $94    $312    $317  

Gross windfall tax benefits

  $56    $145    $71    $145  

The total fair values of restricted stock vested are as follows:

   

Nine Months Ended

March 31

 
   2012   2011 

Fair value of vested shares

  $645    $1,258  
   Three Months Ended 
   September 30, 
   2012   2011 

Compensation expense

  $410    $274  

Tax benefits

  $144    $96  

Gross windfall tax benefits

  $1    $—    

The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan for the nine-month periodthree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012:

 

  Number
of
Shares
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   Number of
Shares
   Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 

Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period

   44   $54.86     62    $63.25  

Granted

   32   $67.63     —      $—    

Vested

   (14 $46.75     —      $—    

Forfeited

   —     $—       —      $—    
  

 

    

 

   

Unvested restricted stock at end of period

   62   $63.26     62    $63.27  
  

 

    

 

   

At March 31,September 30, 2012, there was approximately $2.5$1.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.191.99 years.

Note 8 – Income Taxes

Accrued Federal and state income taxes included in accrued liabilities were $12.4 million and $0 at September 30, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively. The increase was due to the timing of tax payments.

The gross tax contingency reserve at March 31,September 30, 2012 was approximately $1.9$2.0 million and consisted of tax liabilities of approximately $1.0 million and penalties and interest of approximately $0.9$1.0 million. We have classified approximately $0.1$0.2 million of the gross tax contingency reserve as current liabilities as these amounts are expected to be resolved within the next 12 months. The remaining liability of approximately $1.8 million iswas included in other noncurrent liabilities. We expect that the amount of these liabilities will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations. We recognize interest and penalties related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense.

13


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

Note 9 – Business Segment Information

The following summary of financial information by business segment is consistent with the basis of segmentation and measurement of segment profit or loss presented in our June 30, 20112012 consolidated financial statements:

 

  Three Months Ended 
  

Three Months Ended

March 31

 

Nine Months Ended

March 31

   September 30, 
  2012 2011 2012 2011   2012 2011 

Net Sales

        

Specialty Foods

  $237,432   $217,436   $740,604   $692,539    $248,881   $236,947  

Glassware and Candles

   33,666    35,187    116,796    141,373     42,095    37,569  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

  $271,098   $252,623   $857,400   $833,912    $290,976   $274,516  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Operating Income

     

Operating Income (Loss)

   

Specialty Foods

  $29,561   $31,664   $109,510   $121,025    $42,758   $35,199  

Glassware and Candles

   973    676    2,272    5,044     608    (337

Corporate Expenses

   (2,580  (2,866  (7,606  (9,661   (2,794  (2,350
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

  $27,954   $29,474   $104,176   $116,408    $40,572   $32,512  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

In addition to the items discussed below, at March 31,September 30, 2012, we were a party to various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a material effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate disposition will not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumpinganti-dumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2012, as compared to a distribution of approximately $1.0 million in the corresponding period of 2011. Due to an additional distribution received in the fourth quarter of 2011, our CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $14.4 million for 2011.2012. CDSOA remittances have related to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China.

Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of CDSOA provisions for remittances apply only to duties collected on products imported after Septemberprior to October 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.

In addition to this legislative development, casesCases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging certain aspects of CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This allowed the appellate court decisions to stand, but other legal challenges to CDSOA are still pending.

We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of other litigation will be, and it is possible that further legal action, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions, if any, we may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.

14


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Tabular dollars in thousands)

OVERVIEW

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) describes the matters that we consider to be important in understanding the results of our operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 and our financial condition as of March 31, 2012. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 20122013 refers to fiscal 2012,2013, which is the period from July 1, 20112012 to June 30, 2012. In the discussion that follows, we analyze the results of our operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, including the trends in our overall business, followed by a discussion of our financial condition.2013.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this report. The forward-looking statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks and uncertainties including statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYOVERVIEW

Business Overview

Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. Although not material to our consolidated operations, we are also engaged in the distribution of various products, including glassware and candles, to commercial markets. Our operations are organized in two reportable segments: “Specialty Foods” and “Glassware and Candles.” The sales of each segment are predominantlypredominately domestic.

In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods segment. Fiscal years prior to 2009 were significant years in implementing this strategy as we divested various nonfood operations and focused our capital investment in the Specialty Foods segment.

We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and profitability due to attributes such as:

 

leading retail market positions in several branded products with a high-quality perception;

 

a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts;

 

well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts;

 

recognized leadership in foodservice product development;

 

experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and

 

historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities.

Our goal is to grow our specialty foods retail and foodservice business over time by:

 

leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and introduce new products;

 

growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product development and quality; and

 

pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria.

15


In recent years weWe have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and future growth opportunities. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe that our total capital expenditures for 20122013 will total approximately $18between $22 and $25 million.

Summary of 20122013 Results

The following is a comparative overview of our consolidated operating results for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Net sales for the third quarterthree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 increased 7%6% to approximately $271.1$291.0 million from the prior-year total of $252.6$274.5 million. This sales growthincrease reflects higher sales in the Specialty Foods segment, as partially offset by lower sales in the Glassware and Candles segment.both operating segments. The Specialty Foods segment’s increase reflects higher foodserviceretail and retailfoodservice sales. The decreaseincrease in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment primarily reflects lower candle volumes. higher seasonal sales.

Gross margin increased 2%19% to approximately $53.8$65.7 million from the prior-year third quarter total of $52.5$55.4 million. Higher food volumesThe higher level of net sales and increased pricing within both segmentscomparatively lower material costs contributed to the improved gross margin.

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 totaledquarter was approximately $18.2$26.7 million, or $.67$.98 per diluted share. Net income totaled approximately $19.4share, compared to $21.3 million, or $.78 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2011, or $.71 per diluted share.

Year-to-date net sales for the period ended March 31, 2012 increased 3% to approximately $857.4 million from the prior year-to-date total of $833.9 million. Gross margin decreased to approximately $179.1 million from the prior year-to-date total of $188.8 million. Net income for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 totaled approximately $69.9 million, or $2.56 per diluted share. Net income totaled approximately $77.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2011, or $2.77 per diluted share.year.

RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

Net Sales and Gross Margin

 

  Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended       Three Months Ended       
  March 31     March 31       September 30       
  2012 2011 Change 2012 2011 Change   2012 2011 Change 

Net Sales

               

Specialty Foods

  $237,432   $217,436   $19,996    9 $740,604   $692,539   $48,065    7%   $248,881   $236,947   $11,934     5

Glassware and Candles

   33,666    35,187    (1,521)   (4)%   116,796    141,373    (24,577)   (17)%    42,095    37,569    4,526     12
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $271,098   $252,623   $18,475    7 $857,400   $833,912   $23,488    3%   $290,976   $274,516   $16,460     6
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Gross Margin

  $53,802   $52,534   $1,268    2 $179,091   $188,849   $(9,758)   (5) %   $65,717   $55,430   $10,287     19
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Gross Marginas a Percentage of Sales

   19.8%   20.8    20.9  22.6  

Gross Margin as a Percentage of Net Sales

   22.6  20.2   
  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

    

Consolidated net sales for the thirdfirst quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2012 increased 7% and 3%6%, respectively, reflecting higher sales in the Specialty Foods segment, as partially offset by lower sales in the Glassware and Candles segment.both operating segments.

For the three and nine monthsquarter ended March 31,September 30, 2012, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment increased bytotaled approximately 9% and 7%, respectively.$248.9 million, an increase of 5% from the prior-year total of $236.9 million. Higher product pricing totaled approximately 4% and 5%a third of segment net sales growth. Sales volumes for the threeboth retail and nine month periods, respectively. In addition, retail sales also reflected the incremental benefit from somefoodservice products increased with certain recently introduced food products. Furthermore, the favorable impact of the current year’s earlier Easter holiday on comparative sales was estimated at approximately 2% and 1%, respectively, of the segment’s net sales for the three and nine month periods. The segment’sproducts contributing to retail growth. Growth in foodservice sales also increased on higher pricing and expanded volumes associated with programsoccurred largely among existing customers. Looking forward, we anticipate that the extentRetail sales also benefited from lower levels of higher pricing will become less pronounced as we move through the final quarter of 2012.trade and consumer promotional costs.

The decrease in net sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 primarily reflected lower candle volumes. The decrease in netNet sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for the nine monthsquarter ended March 31,September 30, 2012 totaled approximately $42.1 million, a 12% increase from the prior-year total of $37.6 million. The increase in net sales was also influenced by the exitinggrowth of certain lower-margin business, including some seasonal candle programs, withprograms. We expect this segment’s sales to increase again in the quarter ending December 31, 2012, primarily as a result of higher pricing helping to offset someseasonal sales of these declines.candles.

16


As a percentage of net sales, our consolidated gross margin for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 was 19.8% and 20.9%22.6%, respectively, as compared to 20.8% and 22.6%20.2% achieved in the prior-year comparative periods.period.

In the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages declined in bothimproved for the threequarter, reflecting factors such as higher pricing and nine months ended March 31, 2012, reflecting a somewhat lesscomparatively favorable sales mix, as well as comparatively higheringredient costs for a wide variety of raw materials (especially for soybean oil and flour) and freight, as partially offset by higher pricing.dairy-related products). We estimate that higherlower material costs adverselybeneficially affected ourthe segment’s gross margins in these periods by approximately 4% and 6%less than one percent of segment net sales, respectively.sales. Looking forward, under current market conditions, we anticipate that the extent of highersee our material costs will become less pronounced as we movecontinuing to be moderately favorable through the finalsecond quarter of 2012.2013, but anticipate potentially adverse comparisons during the second half of 2013.

Gross margin percentages in the Glassware and Candles segment improved in the three months ended March 31, 2012 due to modest pricing improvement and a better sales mix, which helped offset the impact of lower sales. Gross margin percentages declined slightly from the prior-year nine month period primarily due to higher production levels and somewhat lower average wax costs. We expect these improvements to continue through the impactsecond quarter of higher wax costs, lower sales and reduced production levels. These factors were somewhat mitigated by higher pricing and an improved sales mix.2013.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

  Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended         Three Months Ended       
  March 31       March 31         September 30       
  2012 2011 Change 2012 2011 Change   2012 2011 Change 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

  $25,848   $23,060   $2,788     12 $74,915   $72,441   $2,474     3  $25,145   $22,918   $2,227     10
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Net Sales

   8.6  8.3   
  

 

  

 

    

SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales

   9.5  9.1     8.7  8.7   
  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

    

Consolidated selling, general and administrative costs of approximately $25.8 million and $74.9$25.1 million for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 increased by 12% and 3%, respectively,10% from the $23.1$22.9 million and $72.4 million incurred for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2011, respectively. These increasesand were influenced bygenerally comparable as a percentage of net sales compared to the higher levels of food sales and consumer-directed food marketing expenditures.same period in the prior year.

Operating Income (Loss)

The foregoing factors contributed to consolidated operating income totaling approximately $28.0 million and $104.2$40.6 million for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, respectively. These amounts represent decreases of 5% and 11%, respectively, from the corresponding periods of the prior year.September 30, 2012. By segment, our operating income can be summarized as follows:

 

   Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended       
   March 31        March 31       
   2012  2011  Change  2012  2011  Change 

Operating Income

         

Specialty Foods

  $29,561   $31,664   $(2,103  (7)%  $109,510   $121,025   $(11,515  (10)% 

Glassware and Candles

   973    676    297    44  2,272    5,044    (2,772  (55)% 

Corporate Expenses

   (2,580  (2,866  286    (10)%   (7,606  (9,661  2,055    (21)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $27,954   $29,474   $(1,520  (5)%  $104,176   $116,408   $(12,232  (11)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating Income as a Percentage of Sales

         

Specialty Foods

   12.5  14.6    14.8  17.5  

Glassware and Candles

   2.9  1.9    1.9  3.6  

Consolidated

   10.3  11.7    12.2  14.0  

Other Income – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our reported

17


CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2012, as compared to a distribution of approximately $1.0 million in the corresponding period of 2011. Due to an additional distribution received in the fourth quarter of 2011, our CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $14.4 million for 2011. We do not typically receive CDSOA distributions in the fourth quarter, and we have not received notice of any such distribution for 2012 at this time. CDSOA remittances have related to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China.

Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of CDSOA to duties collected on products imported after September 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.

In addition to this legislative development, cases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging certain aspects of CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This allowed the appellate court decisions to stand, but other legal challenges to CDSOA are still pending.

We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of other litigation will be, and it is possible that further legal action, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions we may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.

   Three Months Ended       
   September 30       
   2012  2011  Change 

Operating Income (Loss)

     

Specialty Foods

  $42,758   $35,199   $7,559    21

Glassware and Candles

   608    (337  945    280

Corporate Expenses

   (2,794  (2,350  (444  19
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $40,572   $32,512   $8,060    25
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Net Sales

     

Specialty Foods

   17.2  14.9  

Glassware and Candles

   1.4  (0.9)%   

Consolidated

   13.9  11.8  

Interest Income and Other – Net

Interest income and other was less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine monthsquarters ended March 31,September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.2011.

Income Before Income Taxes

As impacted by the factors discussed above, income before income taxes for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 decreasedincreased by approximately $1.5$8.1 million to $28.0$40.6 million from the prior-year total of $29.5$32.5 million. Income before income taxes for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $107.0 million and $117.5 million, respectively. Our effective tax rate of 34.7%34.3% for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 was comparable to the prior-year rate of 34.4%34.6%.

Net Income

ThirdFirst quarter net income for 20122013 of approximately $18.2$26.7 million decreasedincreased from the preceding year’sprior-year’s net income for the quarter of $19.4$21.3 million, as influenced by the factors noted above. Year-to-date net income of approximately $69.9 million was lower than the prior year-to-date total of $77.1 million. Net income per share for the thirdfirst quarter of 20122013 totaled $.67approximately $.98 per basic and diluted share, as compared to $.71$.78 per basic and diluted share recorded in the prior year. Year-to-date net income per share was $2.56 per basic and diluted share, as compared to $2.77 per basic and diluted share for the prior-year period.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

For the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $85.2$16.4 million as compared to $98.0$17.6 million in the prior-year period. The decrease resultsresulted from the relative changes in working capital, particularly accounts receivable, as well as lowerinventory, offset somewhat by higher net income. The increase in receivables since June 2011 largely2012 primarily related to seasonal influences on sales within the strength of sales toward the end of the March quarter relative to that of last June.Glassware and Candles segment.

Cash used in investing activities for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 was approximately $12.7$5.7 million as compared to $26.6$4.7 million in the prior year. This decrease reflectsincrease reflected a lowerslightly higher level of capital expenditures in 2012 as the expansion of our frozen roll facility in Kentucky was substantially completed in June 2011.2013.

18


Cash used in financing activities for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2012 of approximately $36.8$9.6 million decreased from the prior-year total of $64.6 million$16.9 million. This decrease was due to a lower level of share repurchases in the current year, as partially offset by an increase inhigher dividend payments. At March 31,September 30, 2012, approximately 1,476,000 shares remained authorized for future buyback under the existing share repurchase program.

At March 31, 2012, we had anUnder our unsecured revolving credit facility, under which we couldmay borrow up to a maximum of $160$120 million at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We had no borrowings outstanding under this facility at March 31,September 30, 2012. At March 31,September 30, 2012, we had approximately $6.7$3.4 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility. At March 31, 2012, we wereThe facility expires in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins. At March 31, 2012, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.

On April 18, 2012, we entered into a new unsecured credit agreement (“New Credit Agreement”) with the Lenders named in the New Credit Agreement and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent. The New Credit Agreement replaced the facility discussed above. The material terms of the New Credit Agreement are substantially similar to the terms of our previous credit agreement, except with respect to maturity, interest rate margins and fees.

The New Credit Agreement provides that we may borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $120 million at any one time. The New Credit Agreement expires on April 18, 2017, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the New Credit Agreement,credit agreement, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. Based on the long-term nature of this facility, when we have outstanding borrowings under this facility, we will classify the outstanding balance as long-term debt.

The New Credit Agreementfacility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility, and we exceeded the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.

We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facility’s covenants for the foreseeable future. A default under the facility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness and limit our access to additional credit available under the facility. Such an event could require curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At September 30, 2012, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.

We believe that internally generated funds and our existing aggregate balances in cash and equivalents, in addition to our currently available bank credit arrangements, should be adequate to meet our foreseeable cash requirements.requirements through 2013. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facility under current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Certain other items, such as purchase obligations, are not recognized as liabilities in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Examples of items not recognized as liabilities in our condensed consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw materials or inventory that havehas not yet been received as of March 31,September 30, 2012 and future minimum lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements. Aside from expected changes in raw-material needs due to changes in product demand, there have been no significant changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in our 20112012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our 20112012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

For a summary ofThere were no recently issued accounting pronouncements applicable to us, see Note 2 to the condensedthat impact our consolidated financial statements.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

19In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 11-12”). This ASU indefinitely defers the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income as set forth in ASU No. 2011-05,“Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 11-05”). ASU 11-12 had the same effective date as the unaffected provisions of ASU 11-05, for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. As this update is merely a deferral, it had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 11-05. This ASU amends current comprehensive income guidance to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05 was effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. As noted above, portions of this ASU relating to reclassifications were indefinitely deferred with the issuance of ASU 11-12. We adopted the presentation provisions of this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting other comprehensive income and its components in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There was no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 11-08”). This ASU permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 was effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this guidance in fiscal 2013, but because the measurement of a potential impairment loss has not changed, the amended standards are not expected to have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws. Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “expect,” “hope” or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial conditions; or state other forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited, control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements, except as required by law. More detailed statements regarding significant events that

Items which could affect our financial results are included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and also our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are available on our website at www.lancastercolony.com.

Specific influences relating toimpact these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

 

the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships;

 

the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels;

 

the continued solvency of key customers;

the success and cost of new product development efforts;

 

the lack of market acceptance of new products;

the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement;

 

changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation or customer goodwill;

 

changes in market trends;

the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;

 

the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective or mislabeled product costs;

 

efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead utilization in candle operations;

the overall strength of the economy;

changes in financial markets;

slower than anticipated sales growth;

the extent of operational efficiencies achieved;

 

price and product competition;

 

the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations;

 

fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials;

 

adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of producing, distributing or transporting our products;

 

the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels, contributions required and benefit costs;

 

maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers, including offshore producers;import sources of production;

 

dependence on key personnel;

 

20


stability of labor relations;

 

capacity constraints, dependence on contract copackers and limited or exclusive sources for certain goods;

effect of governmental regulations, including environmental matters;

 

legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000;

 

access to any required financing;

changes in income tax laws;

 

unknown costs relating to the holding or disposition of idle real estate;

 

changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments;

 

the outcome of any litigation or arbitration; and

 

innumerablecertain other factors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 20112012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,September 30, 2012 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is 1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and 2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

21


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our 20112012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) In November 2010, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares, of which approximately 1,476,000 shares remained authorized for future repurchases at March 31,September 30, 2012. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated expiration date. In the thirdfirst quarter, we made the following repurchasesdid not repurchase any of our common stock:

 

           Total Number     
   Total   Average   of Shares   Maximum Number 
   Number   Price   Purchased as   of Shares That May 
   of Shares   Paid Per   Part of Publicly   Yet be Purchased 

Period

  Purchased   Share   Announced Plans   Under the Plans 

January 1-31, 2012

   —      $—       —       1,477,947  

February 1-29, 2012(1)

   1,824    $67.94     1,824     1,476,123  

March 1-31, 2012

   —      $—       —       1,476,123  
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total

   1,824    $67.94     1,824     1,476,123  
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Period

Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average
Price
Paid Per
Share
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans

July 1-31, 2012

—  $—  —  1,476,123

August 1-31, 2012

—  $—  —  1,476,123

September 1-30, 2012

—  $—  —  1,476,123

 

(1)

Includes 1,824 shares that were repurchased in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan.

Total

—  $—  —  1,476,123

Item 6. Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits following Signatures.

22


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION

(Registrant)

            (Registrant)
Date:  May 10,November 6, 2012  By:  

/s/S/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.

    John B. Gerlach, Jr.
    

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:  May 10,November 6, 2012  By:  

/s/S/ JOHN L. BOYLAN

    John L. Boylan
    

Treasurer, Vice President,

Assistant Secretary,

Chief Financial Officer
and Director

(Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)

23


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

MARCH 31,SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit


Number

 

Description

  

Located at

31.1

 Certification of CEO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith

31.2

 Certification of CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith

32

 Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith
Act of 2002Filed herewith

101.INS

 XBRL Instance Document  FurnishedFiled herewith

101.SCH

 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document  FurnishedFiled herewith

101.CAL

 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document  FurnishedFiled herewith

101.DEF

 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document  FurnishedFiled herewith

101.LAB

 XBRL Taxonomy Extension LabelsLabel Linkbase Document  FurnishedFiled herewith

101.PRE

 XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document  FurnishedFiled herewith

 

2422