UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

xQuarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period ended March 31,June 30, 2012.

 

¨Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission file number 000-28249

 

 

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

 

BERMUDA 98-0207447

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

c/o Cedar Management Limited

25 Church Street, Continental Building

P.O. Box HM 1601, Hamilton, Bermuda

 HMGX
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(441) 295-6015

(Telephone number)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x.

As of MayAugust 1, 2012, the Registrant had 995,253 common shares, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding.

 

 

 


Introductory Note

Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q, or otherwise made by our officers, including statements related to our future performance, our outlook for our businesses and respective markets, projections, statements of our management’s plans or objectives, forecasts of market trends and other matters, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and contain information relating to us that is based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The words “expect,” “believe,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “goal” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statements. Our actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to the factors discussed in detail in Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-Q, as well as:

 

our ability to generate increased revenues and positive earnings in future periods;

 

the occurrence of catastrophic events with a frequency or severity exceeding our expectations;

 

a decrease in the level of demand for professional liability insurance and reinsurance or an increase in the supply of professional liability insurance and reinsurance capacity;

 

the successful implementation of our new business plan without a significant depletion of our cash resources, the maintenance of sufficient capital levels and the retention of our current A.M. Best financial strength rating of
“A- “A-” (Excellent);

 

a worsening of the current global economic market conditions and global credit crisis and changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions;

 

increased competitive pressures, including the consolidation and increased globalization of reinsurance providers;

 

actual losses and loss expenses exceeding our loss reserves, which are necessarily based on the actuarial and statistical projections of ultimate losses;

 

increased rate pressure on premiums;

 

adequacy of our risk management and loss limitation methods;

 

the integration of businesses we may acquire or new business ventures we may start;

 

acts of terrorism, political unrest, outbreak of war and other hostilities or other non-forecasted and unpredictable events;

 

changes in the legal or regulatory environments in which we operate; and

 

other risks, including those risks identified in any of our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s analysis only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any future revisions we may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

2


Part I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.Financial Statements.

AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited, expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

  As of
March 31,
2012
 As of
December 31,
2011
   As of
June 30,
2012
 As of
December  31,
2011
 

ASSETS

      

INVESTMENTS

      

Fixed maturity investments, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost $9,707,322 and $9,914,515)

  $10,208,777   $10,448,847  

Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost $7,722,045 and $7,574,686)

   13,188,452    12,296,703  

Fixed maturity investments, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost $9,787,181 and $9,914,515)

  $10,320,450   $10,448,847  

Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost $7,543,711 and $7,574,686)

   12,637,363    12,296,703  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS

   23,397,229    22,745,550     22,957,813    22,745,550  

Cash and cash equivalents

   937,256    904,485     753,542    904,485  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

   280,418    435,924     236,071    435,924  

Assumed reinsurance balances receivable

   249,260    183,518     235,656    183,518  

Accrued investment income

   170,059    94,539     101,900    94,539  

Property and equipment

   696,995    745,784     648,207    745,784  

Deferred policy acquisition costs

   227,194    146,226     259,698    146,226  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   291,153    378,257     488,829    378,257  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $26,249,564   $25,634,283    $25,681,716   $25,634,283  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      

LIABILITIES

      

Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses

  $1,147,276   $1,043,443    $1,303,825   $1,043,443  

Unearned premium

   611,428    392,595     701,857    392,595  

Assumed reinsurance balances payable

   —      86,685     —      86,685  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   1,138,051    1,396,332     1,260,701    1,396,332  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

  $2,896,755   $2,919,055    $3,266,383   $2,919,055  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      

Common shares, $1 par value, 2012 and 2011: 2,000,000 shares authorized, 995,253 issued and outstanding

  $995,253   $995,253    $995,253   $995,253  

Additional paid-in capital

   6,287,293    6,287,293     6,287,293    6,287,293  

Retained earnings

   17,337,601    17,411,533     16,636,066    17,411,533  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   5,967,862    5,256,349     5,626,921    5,256,349  

Shares held by Subsidiary (311,633 and 311,633 shares) at cost

   (7,235,200  (7,235,200

Shares held by Subsidiary (308,560 and 311,633 shares) at cost

   (7,130,200  (7,235,200
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   23,352,809    22,715,228     22,415,333    22,715,228  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $26,249,564   $25,634,283    $25,681,716   $25,634,283  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

OPERATIONS, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)LOSS

AND RETAINED EARNINGS

(Unaudited, expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2012
 Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2011
   Six Months
Ended
June 30,
2012
 Six Months
Ended
June 30,
2011
 Three Months
Ended
June 30,
2012
 Three Months
Ended
June 30,
2011
 

REVENUE

        

Net premiums earned

  $176,821   $45,490    $453,272   $125,561   $276,451   $80,071  

Commission income

   214,944    72,609     405,576    144,345    190,632    71,736  

Other income

   98,156    —       98,156    —      —      —    

Net investment income

   95,266    95,344     207,120    212,825    111,854    117,481  

Net realized gain on investments

   609,093    816,768     612,028    1,316,139    2,935    499,371  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

TOTAL REVENUE

   1,194,280    1,030,211     1,776,152    1,798,870    581,872    768,659  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

LOSSES AND EXPENSES

        

Losses and loss adjustment expenses

   110,514    28,452     283,295    78,466    172,781    50,014  

Policy acquisition costs

   65,424    16,831     168,667    47,336    103,243    30,505  

Operating and management expenses

   935,954    1,163,853     1,943,337    2,267,158    1,007,383    1,103,305  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

TOTAL LOSSES AND EXPENSES

   1,111,892    1,209,136     2,395,299    2,392,960    1,283,407    1,183,824  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAX

  $82,388   $(178,925

NET LOSS BEFORE TAX

   (619,147  (594,090  (701,535  (415,165

Income tax expense

   —      —      —      —    

NET LOSS AFTER TAX

  $(619,147 $(594,090 $(701,535 $(415,165
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense

   —      —    

NET INCOME (LOSS) AFTER TAX

  $82,388   $(178,925

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

        

Net unrealized holding gains arising during the period

   1,320,606    673,220  

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) included in net income (loss)

   (609,093  (816,768

Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period

   982,600    1,044,193    (338,006  370,973  

Reclassification adjustment for (gain) included in net (loss)

   (612,028  (1,316,139  (2,935  (499,371
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

   711,513    (143,548   370,572    (271,946  (340,941  (128,398
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

  $793,901   $(322,473

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

  $(248,575 $(866,036 $(1,042,476 $(543,563
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

RETAINED EARNINGS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

  $17,411,533   $19,096,686    $17,411,533   $19,096,686   $17,337,601   $18,589,070  

Net income (loss)

   82,388    (178,925

Net loss

   (619,147  (594,090  (701,535  (415,165

Dividends

   (156,320  (328,691   (156,320  (289,178  —      39,513  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

RETAINED EARNINGS, END OF PERIOD

   17,337,601    18,589,070    $16,636,066   $18,213,418   $16,636,066   $18,213,418  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Per share amounts

        

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share

  $0.12   $(0.25

Basic and diluted loss

  $(0.90 $(0.85 $(1.02 $(0.60
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Dividends

  $0.25   $0.47    $0.25   $0.47   $0.00   $0.00  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding for the entire period

   689,485    714,278  

Weighted average number of shares outstanding for the entire period (for basic and diluted)

   687,321    698,031    685,157    697,361  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited, expressed in U.S. dollars)

 

  Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2012
 Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2011
   Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2012
 Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2011
 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net Cash used in Operating Activities

  $(628,148 $(1,241,861  $(950,825 $(2,106,819
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

      

Movement in restricted cash and cash equivalents

   155,506    (84,085   199,853    (48,796

Purchases of property and equipment

   —      (13,785   —      (126,167

Purchases of available-for-sale securities

   (822,467  (427,678   (1,457,483  (844,512

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities

   1,284,200    1,673,979     1,513,832    3,047,595  

Proceeds from redemptions of fixed maturity investments

   500,000    —    

Proceeds from maturities of fixed maturity investments

   200,000    500,000     200,000    500,000  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Cash provided by Investing Activities

   817,239    1,648,431     956,202    2,528,120  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

      

Purchase of shares by subsidiary, net

   —      (148,409

Dividends paid

   (156,320  (328,691   (156,320  (289,178
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Cash used in Financing Activities

   (156,320  (328,691   (156,320  (437,587
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   32,771    77,879  

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (150,943  (16,286

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

  $904,485   $970,697    $904,485   $970,697  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

  $937,256   $1,048,576    $753,542   $954,411  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31,June 30, 2012

1. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND CONSOLIDATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (“AmerInst”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”), and reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations as of the end of and for the periods presented. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. These statements are condensed and do not incorporate all the information required under generally accepted accounting principles to be included in a full set of financial statements. In these notes, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” refer to AmerInst and its subsidiaries. These condensed statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and notes thereto, included in AmerInst’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended.

New Accounting Pronouncements

(a) Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amendments to disclosure requirements for common fair value measurement. These amendments, effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), resulted in a common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement and disclosure under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Consequently, the amendments have changed some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The implementation of this amended accounting guidance has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance revising the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity is eliminated. Components of comprehensive income may be reported in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. The new requirements were effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and require retrospective application; early adoption was permitted. As the new guidance does not change the items that constitute net income and/or other comprehensive income, the timing of reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income or the earnings per share computation, the adoption of this guidance has not impacted our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

(b) Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). The objective of ASU 2011-11 is to enhance disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments in relation to netting arrangements. ASU 2011-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance; however, since this update affects disclosures only, it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company has determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements do not apply to its operations.

 

6


2. INVESTMENTS

The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed maturity investments, by major security type, and equity securities as of March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

  Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
   Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
 

As of March 31, 2012

       

As of June 30, 2012

       

Fixed maturity investments:

              

U.S. government agency securities

  $1,446,346    $4,527    $(1,218 $1,449,655    $946,468    $17,477    $—     $963,945  

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   7,929,448     487,805     —      8,417,253     8,510,692     521,262     (14,952  9,017,002  

Corporate debt securities

   331,528     10,341     —      341,869     330,021     9,482     —      339,503  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total fixed maturity investments

   9,707,322     502,673     (1,218  10,208,777     9,787,181     548,221     (14,952  10,320,450  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Equity securities*

   6,722,045     5,012,106     —      11,734,151     6,543,711     4,661,031     —      11,204,742  

Hedge fund

   1,000,000     454,301     —      1,454,301     1,000,000     432,621     —      1,432,621  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total equity securities

   7,722,045     5,466,407     —      13,188,452     7,543,711     5,093,652     —      12,637,363  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total investments

  $17,429,367    $5,969,080    $(1,218 $23,397,229    $17,330,892    $5,641,873    $(14,952 $22,957,813  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
  Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
   Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
 

As of December 31, 2011

              

Fixed maturity investments:

              

U.S. government agency securities

  $1,446,223    $7,882    $—     $1,454,105    $1,446,223    $7,882    $—     $1,454,105  

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   8,135,268     531,523     (1,257  8,665,534     8,135,268     531,523     (1,257  8,665,534  

Corporate debt securities

   333,024     —       (3,816  329,208     333,024     —       (3,816  329,208  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total fixed maturity investments

   9,914,515     539,405     (5,073  10,448,847     9,914,515     539,405     (5,073  10,448,847  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Equity securities*

   6,574,686     4,360,802     (34,718  10,900,770     6,574,686     4,360,802     (34,718  10,900,770  

Hedge fund

   1,000,000     395,933     —      1,395,933     1,000,000     395,933     —      1,395,933  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total equity securities

   7,574,686     4,756,735     (34,718  12,296,703     7,574,686     4,756,735     (34,718  12,296,703  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total investments

  $17,489,201    $5,296,140    $(39,791 $22,745,550    $17,489,201    $5,296,140    $(39,791 $22,745,550  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 *The Company’s equity securities are managed by an external large cap value advisor. Our investment approach is to focus on increasing the fair market value of our equity securities by investing in companies that may or may not be paying a dividend but whose market values may increase over time. Some of the key factors we consider in a prospective company to invest in include the discount to value and the quality of the management team.

The following tables summarize the Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities in an unrealized loss position and the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time the security has continuously been in an unrealized loss position:

 

  12 months or greater   Less than 12 months Total   12 months or greater   Less than 12 months Total 
  Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair  Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair  Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair  Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 

As of March 31, 2012

           

As of June 30, 2012

           

Fixed maturity investments:

                      

U.S. government agency securities

  $—      $—      $445,128    $(1,218 $445,128    $(1,218  $—      $—      $—      $—     $—      $—    

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   —       —       —       —      —       —       —       —       570,849     (14,952  570,849     (14,952

Corporate debt securities

   —       —       —       —      —       —       —       —       —       —      —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total fixed maturity investments

   —       —       445,128     (1,218  445,128     (1,218   —       —       570,849     (14,952  570,849     (14,952
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Equity securities

   —       —       —       —      —       —       —       —       —       —      —       —    

Hedge fund

   —       —       —       —      —       —       —       —       —       —      —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total equity securities

   —       —       —       —      —       —       —       —       —       —      —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total investments

  $—      $—      $445,128    $(1,218 $445,128    $(1,218  $—      $—      $570,849    $(14,952 $570,849    $(14,952
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

7


  12 months or greater   Less than 12 months Total   12 months or greater   Less than 12 months Total 
  Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair  Value
   Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair  Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair  Value
   Unrealized
Losses
 

As of December 31, 2011

                      

Fixed maturity investments:

                      

U.S. government agency securities

  $—      $—      $—      $—     $—      $—      $—      $—      $—      $—     $—      $—    

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

   —       —       200,046     (1,257  200,046     (1,257   —       —       200,046     (1,257  200,046     (1,257

Corporate debt securities

   —       —       329,208     (3,816  329,208     (3,816   —       —       329,208     (3,816  329,208     (3,816
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total fixed maturity investments

   —       —       529,254     (5,073  529,254     (5,073   —       —       529,254     (5,073  529,254     (5,073
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Equity securities

   —       —       864,871     (34,718  864,871     (34,718   —       —       864,871     (34,718  864,871     (34,718

Hedge fund

   —       —       —       —      —       —       —       —       —       —      —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total equity securities

   —       —       864,871     (34,718  864,871     (34,718   —       —       864,871     (34,718  864,871     (34,718
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total investments

  $—      $—      $1,394,125    $(39,791 $1,394,125    $(39,791  $—      $—      $1,394,125    $(39,791 $1,394,125    $(39,791
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

As of March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were one and four securities in an unrealized loss position with an estimated fair value of $445,128$570,849 and $1,394,125, respectively. Of these securities, none had been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater. As of March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, none of these securities were considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company has no intent to sell and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before their fair values recover above the adjusted cost. The unrealized losses from these securities were not as a result of credit, collateral or structural issues.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Process

The Company assesses whether declines in the fair value of its fixed maturity investments classified as available-for-sale represent impairments that are other-than-temporary by reviewing each fixed maturity investment that is impaired and (1) determining if the Company has the intent to sell the fixed maturity investment or if it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery; and (2) assessing whether a credit loss exists, that is, where the Company expects that the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the fixed maturity investment are less than the amortized cost basis of the investment.

The Company had no planned sales of its fixed maturity investments classified as available-for-sale that were in an unrealized loss position at March 31,June 30, 2012. In assessing whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell a fixed maturity investment before its anticipated recovery, the Company considers various factors including its future cash flow requirements, legal and regulatory requirements, the level of its cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and fixed maturity investments available for sale in an unrealized gain position, and other relevant factors. For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairments due to required sales.

In evaluating credit losses, the Company considers a variety of factors in the assessment of a fixed maturity investment including: (1) the time period during which there has been a significant decline below cost; (2) the extent of the decline below cost and par; (3) the potential for the fixed maturity investment to recover in value; (4) an analysis of the financial condition of the issuer; (5) the rating of the issuer; and (6) failure of the issuer of the fixed maturity investment to make scheduled interest or principal payments.

If we conclude a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, we write down the amortized cost of the security to fair value, with a charge to net realized investment gains (losses) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Gross unrealized losses on the investment portfolio as of March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, relating to one and two fixed maturity securities and none and two equity securities, amounted to $1,218$14,952 and $39,791, respectively. This decrease was primarily attributable to the increase in the fair values of certain equity securities as a result of favorable market conditions duringwhich we determined were not other than temporarily impaired based on the quarter.process described above. The unrealized losses on these available for sale fixed maturity securities were not as a result of credit, collateral or structural issues. During the quartersix months ended March 31,and three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded a total other-than-temporary impairment charge of $64,189$165,611 and $101,422, respectively, on onetwo equity security,securities, as a result of the decline in fair value below cost. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded during the quartersix months and three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011.

Fair Value of Investments

Under existing accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,U.S. GAAP, we are required to recognize certain assets at their fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. This includes our fixed maturity investments and equity securities. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes

8


a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements.

8


The valuation hierarchy is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability are observable or unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

At each measurement date, we estimate the fair value of the security using various valuation techniques. We utilize, to the extent available, quoted market prices in active markets or observable market inputs in estimating the fair value of our investments. When quoted market prices or observable market inputs are not available, we utilize valuation techniques that rely on unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of investments. The following describes the valuation techniques we used to determine the fair value of investments held as of March 31,June 30, 2012 and what level within the fair value hierarchy each valuation technique resides:

 

U.S. government agency securities: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Farm Credit Bank and the Federal National Mortgage Association. The fair values of U.S. government agency securities are priced using the spread above the risk-free U.S. Treasury yield curve. As the yields for the risk-free U.S. Treasury yield curve are observable market inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers a liquid market to exist for these types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

Obligations of state and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of state and local governmental municipalities. The fair values of these securities are based on quotes and current market spread relationships, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers a liquid market to exist for these types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

Corporate debt securities: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations. The fair values of these securities are based on quotes and current market spread relationships, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. AmerInst considers a liquid market to exist for these types of securities held. Broker quotes are not used for fair value pricing.

 

Equity securities, at fair value: Comprised primarily of investments in the common stock of publicly traded companies in the U.S. All of the Company’s equities are included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy. The Company receives prices based on closing exchange prices from independent pricing sources to measure fair values for the equities.

 

Hedge fund: Comprised of a hedge fund whose objective is to seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified investment strategies. The fund invests in a diversified pool of hedge fund managers, generally across six different strategies: long/short equities, long/short credit, macro, multi-strategy opportunistic, event-driven, and portfolio hedge. The fair value of the hedge fund is based on the net asset value of the fund as reported by the external fund manager. The use of net asset value as an estimate of the fair value for investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value is a permitted practical expedient. The fair value of our hedge fund is included in the Level 3 fair value hierarchy.

To validate prices, we complete quantitative analyses to compare the performance of the above investments to the performance of appropriate benchmarks, with significant differences identified and investigated.

 

9


There have been no material changes to any of our valuation techniques from what was used as of December 31, 2011. Since the fair value of a security is an estimate of what a willing buyer would pay for our asset if we sold it, we will not know the ultimate value of our securities until they are sold. We believe the valuation techniques utilized provide us with a reasonable estimate of the price that would be received to sell our assets or transfer our liabilities in an orderly market transaction between participants at the measurement date. The following tables show the fair value of the Company’s investments in accordance with ASC 820 as of March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

          Fair value measurement using:           Fair value measurement using: 
  Carrying
amount
   Total fair
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
   Carrying
amount
   Total fair
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable  inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable  inputs
(Level 3)
 

As of March 31, 2012

          

As of June 30, 2012

          

U.S. government agency securities

  $1,449,655    $1,449,655    $—      $1,449,655    $—      $963,945    $963,945    $—      $963,945    $—    

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

   8,417,253     8,417,253       8,417,253       9,017,002     9,017,002       9,017,002    

Corporate debt securities

   341,869     341,869       341,869       339,503     339,503       339,503    
  

 

   

 

         

 

   

 

       

Total fixed maturity investments

   10,208,777     10,208,777           10,320,450     10,320,450        
  

 

   

 

         

 

   

 

       

Equity securities (excluding the hedge fund)

   11,734,151     11,734,151     11,734,151         11,204,742     11,204,742     11,204,742      

Hedge fund

   1,454,301     1,454,301         1,454,301     1,432,621     1,432,621         1,432,621  
  

 

   

 

         

 

   

 

       

Total equity securities

   13,188,452     13,188,452           12,637,363     12,637,363        
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total investments

  $23,397,229    $23,397,229    $11,734,151    $10,208,777    $1,454,301    $22,957,813    $22,957,813    $11,204,742    $10,320,450    $1,432,621  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
          Fair value measurement using:           Fair value measurement using: 
  Carrying
amount
   Total fair
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
   Carrying
amount
   Total fair
value
   Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
   Significant other
observable inputs

(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable inputs
(Level 3)
 

As of December 31, 2011

                    

U.S. government agency securities

  $1,454,105    $1,454,105    $—      $1,454,105    $—      $1,454,105    $1,454,105    $—      $1,454,105    $—    

Obligations of state and political subdivisions

   8,665,534     8,665,534       8,665,534       8,665,534     8,665,534       8,665,534    

Corporate debt securities

   329,208     329,208       329,208       329,208     329,208       329,208    
  

 

   

 

         

 

   

 

       

Total fixed maturity investments

   10,448,847     10,448,847           10,448,847     10,448,847        
  

 

   

 

         

 

   

 

       

Equity securities (excluding the hedge fund)

   10,900,770     10,900,770     10,900,770         10,900,770     10,900,770     10,900,770      

Hedge fund

   1,395,933     1,395,933         1,395,933     1,395,933     1,395,933         1,395,933  
  

 

   

 

         

 

   

 

       

Total equity securities

   12,296,703     12,296,703           12,296,703     12,296,703        
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total investments

  $22,745,550    $22,745,550    $10,900,770    $10,448,847    $1,395,933    $22,745,550    $22,745,550    $10,900,770    $10,448,847    $1,395,933  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

10


The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011:

 

  Hedge Fund Investment
Three Months
ended
   Hedge Fund  Investment
Six Months
ended
 
  March 31,
2012
   March 31,
2011
   June  30,
2012
   June  30,
2011
 

Balance classified as Level 3, beginning of period

  $1,395,933    $1,484,884    $1,395,933    $1,484,884  

Total gains or losses included in earnings:

   —       —       —       —    

Net realized gains

   —       —       —       —    

Change in fair value of hedge fund investment

   58,368     18,219     36,688     21,525  

Purchases or sales

   —       —       —       —    

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

   —       —       —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Ending balance, end of period

  $1,454,301    $1,503,103    $1,432,621    $1,506,409  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

There were no transfers into or from the Level 3 hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

   Hedge Fund  Investment
Three Months
ended
 
   June  30,
2012
  June  30,
2011
 

Balance classified as Level 3, beginning of period

  $1,454,301   $1,503,103  

Total gains or losses included in earnings:

   —      —    

Net realized gains

   —      —    

Change in fair value of hedge fund investment

   (21,680  3,306  

Purchases or sales

   —      —    

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

   —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance, end of period

  $1,432,621   $1,506,409  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

There were no transfers into or from the Level 3 hierarchy during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011.

The cost or amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity investments as of March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties.

 

  Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair  Value
 

As of March 31, 2012

    

As of June 30, 2012

    

Due in one year or less

  $509,179    $512,228    $1,088,797    $1,104,780  

Due after one year through five years

   6,013,455     6,327,432     4,928,044     5,210,360  

Due after five years through ten years

   3,184,688     3,369,117     3,770,340     4,005,310  

Due after ten years

   —       —       —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $9,707,322    $10,208,777    $9,787,181    $10,320,450  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair  Value
 

As of December 31, 2011

        

Due in one year or less

  $510,949    $516,938    $510,949    $516,938  

Due after one year through five years

   5,885,709     6,210,596     5,885,709     6,210,596  

Due after five years through ten years

   3,517,857     3,721,313     3,517,857     3,721,313  

Due after ten years

   —       —       —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $9,914,515    $10,448,847    $9,914,515    $10,448,847  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

11


Information on sales and maturities of investments during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

   June 30,
2012
  June 30,
2011
 

Total proceeds on sales of available-for-sale securities

  $1,513,832   $3,047,595  

Proceeds from redemptions of fixed maturity investments

   500,000    —    

Total proceeds from maturities of fixed maturity investments

   200,000    500,000  

Gross gains on sales

   777,639    1,342,378  

Gross losses on sales

   —      (26,239

Impairment losses

   (165,611  —    

Information on sales and maturities of investments during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

 

  March 31,
2012
 March 31,
2011
   June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
 

Total proceeds on sales of available-for-sale securities

  $1,284,200   $1,673,979    $229,632   $1,373,616  

Proceeds from redemptions of fixed maturity investments

   500,000    —    

Total proceeds from maturities of fixed maturity investments

   200,000    500,000     —      —    

Gross gains on sales

   673,282    843,007     104,357    499,371  

Gross losses on sales

   —      (26,239   —      —    

Impairment losses

   (64,189  —       (101,422  —    

Major categories of net interest and dividend income during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:

 

11


   June 30,
2012
  June 30,
2011
 

Interest earned:

   

Fixed maturity investments

  $174,355   $174,247  

Cash and cash equivalents

   325    190  

Dividends earned

   97,297    109,982  

Investment expenses

   (64,857  (71,594
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net investment income

  $207,120   $212,825  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Major categories of net interest and dividend income during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:

 

  March 31,
2012
 March 31,
2011
   June 30,
2012
 June 30,
2011
 

Interest earned:

      

Fixed maturity investments

  $87,377   $88,982    $86,978   $85,265  

Cash and cash equivalents

   157    52     168    138  

Dividends earned

   39,673    42,512     57,624    67,470  

Investment expenses

   (31,941  (36,202   (32,916  (35,392
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net investment income

  $95,266   $95,344    $111,854   $117,481  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

12


3. SEGMENT INFORMATION

AmerInst has two operating segments: (1) reinsurance activity, which also includes investments and other activities, and (2) insurance activity, which offers professional liability solutions to professional service firms under the Agency Agreement with C&F, as defined in the “Overview” section below.

The tables below summarize the results of our operating segments for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

  Three Months Ended March 31, 2012   Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 
  Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
 Total   Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
 Total 

Revenues

  $979,199    $215,081   $1,194,280    $1,370,328    $405,824   $1,776,152  

Total losses and expenses

  $440,423    $671,469   $1,111,892     1,126,450     1,268,849    2,395,299  

Segment income (loss)

  $538,776    $(456,388 $82,388    $243,878    $(863,025 $(619,147

Identifiable assets

  $—      $696,995   $696,995    $—      $648,207   $648,207  
  Three Months Ended March 31, 2011   Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 
  Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
 Total   Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
 Total 

Revenues

  $957,558    $72,653   $1,030,211    $1,654,442    $144,428   $1,798,870  

Total losses and expenses

  $396,107    $813,029   $1,209,136     908,525     1,484,435    2,392,960  

Segment income (loss)

  $561,451    $(740,376 $(178,925  $745,917    $(1,340,007 $(594,090

Identifiable assets

  $—      $730,015   $730,015    $—      $842,397   $842,397  

The tables below summarize the results of our operating segments for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

   Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 
   Reinsurance
Segment
  Insurance
Segment
  Total 

Revenues

  $391,129   $190,743   $581,872  

Total losses and expenses

   686,027    597,380    1,283,407  

Segment loss

  $(294,898 $(406,637 $(701,535

Identifiable assets

  $—     $648,207   $648,207  
   Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 
   Reinsurance
Segment
  Insurance
Segment
  Total 

Revenues

  $696,884   $71,775   $768,659  

Total losses and expenses

   512,418    671,406    1,183,824  

Segment income (loss)

  $184,466   $(599,631 $(415,165

Identifiable assets

  $—     $842,397   $842,397  

4. STOCK COMPENSATION

AmerInst Professional Services Limited (“APSL”), a subsidiary of AmerInst, has entered into employment agreements with four key members of senior management, which grant them phantom shares of the Company. Under these agreements, these employees were initially granted a total of 75,018 phantom shares of the Company on the date of their employment. The phantom shares are eligible for phantom dividends paid at the same rate as regular dividends on the Company’s common shares. The phantom dividends may be used only to purchase additional phantom shares with the purchase price of such phantom shares being the net book value of the Company’s actual common shares as of the end of the previous quarter. During the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, no phantom shares were granted since no dividends were declared on the Company’s common shares. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 593 phantom shares were granted arising from the dividends declared on the Company’s common shares. 79,466 phantom shares were outstanding at March 31,June 30, 2012.

13


The employees’ interest in the phantom shares initially granted as well as any additional shares granted from dividends declared will vest on January 1, 2015. The liability payable to the employees under this phantom share plan is equal to the value of the phantom shares based on the net book value of the Company’s actual common shares at the end of the previous quarter less the value of phantom shares initially granted and is payable in cash upon the earlier of the employee attaining 65 years of age or within 60 days of such employee’s death or permanent disability, including if such death or permanent disability occurs before January 1, 2015.

The liability relating to these phantom shares is recalculated quarterly based on the net book value of the Company’s common shares at the end of each quarter. As a result of the overall decrease in the book value of the Company’s common shares since the grant dates, no liability has been recorded by the Company relating to these phantom shares at March 31,June 30, 2012.

 

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) provides supplemental information, which sets forth the major factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operation and should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-Q.

12


Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including this MD&A section, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and contain information relating to us that is based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The words “expect,” “believe,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “goal” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements. Please see the Introductory Note and Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated in our subsequent quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q, and in our other filings made from time to time with the SEC after the date of this report for a discussion of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. However, the risk factors listed in Item 1A “Risk Factors” or discussed in this Form 10-Q should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s analysis only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any future revisions we may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

The following discussion addresses our financial condition and results of operations for the periods and as of the dates indicated.

OVERVIEW

Unless otherwise indicated by the context, in this quarterly report we refer to AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. and its subsidiaries as the “Company”, “AmerInst,” “we” or “us.” “AMIC Ltd.” means AmerInst’s wholly-owned subsidiary, AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd. “APSL” means AmerInst Professional Services, Limited, a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst Mezco, Ltd. (“Mezco”) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AmerInst. “Investco” means AmerInst Investment Company, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMIC Ltd. “AMIG” means our predecessor entity, AmerInst Insurance Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Our principal offices are c/o Cedar Management Limited, 25 Church Street, Continental Building, P.O. Box HM 1601, Hamilton, Bermuda, HM GX.

AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. is a Bermuda holding company formed in 1998 that provides insurance protection for professional service firms and engages in investment activities. AmerInst has two operating segments: (1) reinsurance activity, which includes investments and other activities, and (2) insurance activity, which offers professional liability solutions to professional service firms. The revenues of the reinsurance activity operating segment and the insurance activity operating segment were $979,199$1,370,328 and $215,081$405,824 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 compared to $957,558$1,654,442 and $72,653$144,428 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, respectively. The revenues for both operating segments were derived from business operations in the United States other than interest income on bank accounts maintained in Bermuda.

Entry into Agency Agreement

On September 25, 2009, APSL entered into an agency agreement (the “Agency Agreement”) with The North River Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Indemnity Company, Crum and Forster Insurance Company, and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (collectively, “C&F”) pursuant to which C&F appointed APSL as its exclusive agent for the purposes of soliciting, underwriting, quoting, binding, issuing, cancelling, non-renewing and endorsing accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability insurance coverage in all 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia. The initial term of the Agency Agreement is for four years with automatic one-year renewals thereafter.

14


Entry into Reinsurance Agreement

We conduct our reinsurance business through AMIC Ltd., our subsidiary, which is a registered insurer in Bermuda. On September 25, 2009, AMIC Ltd. entered into a professional liability quota share agreement with C&F (the “Reinsurance Agreement”) pursuant to which C&F agreed to cede, and AMIC Ltd. agreed to accept as reinsurance, a 50% quota share of C&F’s liability under insurance written by APSL on behalf of C&F and classified by C&F as accountants’ professional liability and lawyers’ professional liability, subject to AMIC Ltd.’s surplus limitations. The initial term of the Reinsurance Agreement is for four years with automatic one-year renewals thereafter.

Historical Relationship with CAMICO

From June 1, 2005 through May 31, 2009, we were a party to a reinsurance contract with CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company (“CAMICO”), a California-based writer of accountants’ professional liability business.

We decided not to renew the CAMICO contract and permitted the contract to expire pursuant to its terms on May 31, 2009. We remain potentially liable for claims related to coverage through May 31, 2009.

13


VSC Payment

On July 22, 2009, the Company received a payment of $500,891 from FFG Insurance Company, formerly known as Virginia Surety Company (“VSC”), in satisfaction of certain recoveries not previously remitted by VSC under retrocession contracts between the Company and VSC for the years 1989 through 1993. The $500,891 payment was recorded as a decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009. Following this payment, the Company initiated arbitration with VSC (the “Arbitration”) to seek additional recoveries in respect of unpaid losses, unpaid premiums, fees and interest. During the arbitration, VSC conceded that $25,785 in unpaid premiums was due and a payment was remitted to the Company. On October 8, 2011, the Company was formally awarded $289,514 as a result of the Arbitration’s final outcome. The award represented unpaid losses of $241,943, fees of $11,280 and interest of $36,291. The total net award of $315,299 from VSC was recorded as a decrease in losses and loss adjustment expenses in the third quarter of 2011.

Attorneys’ Professional Liability Coverage

On January 1, 2003, we entered into a 15% quota share participation of the attorneys’ professional liability coverage provided by Professionals Direct Insurance Company (“PDIC”). This participation terminated on December 31, 2003. We remain potentially liable for claims related to this period of coverage.

Third-party Managers and Service Providers

Cedar Management Limited provides the day-to-day services necessary for the administration of our business. Our agreement with Cedar Management Limited renewed for one year beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012. Mr. Stuart Grayston, our President, was formerly a director and officer of Cedar Management Limited, and Mr. Thomas R. McMahon, our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, is a shareholder, officer, director and employee of Cedar Management Limited.

Mowery & Schoenfeld, LLC, an accounting firm affiliated with a former director and chairman emeritus, provides accounting functions to APSL. Our agreement with Mowery & Schoenfeld, LLC renewed for one year beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2012, pursuant to a letter of understanding dated February 20, 2012. While the letter of understanding has no termination notice clause, it can be terminated by either party.

The Country Club Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, provides portfolio management of fixed-income securities and directs our investments pursuant to guidelines approved by us. Harris Associates L.P. and Aurora Investment Management, LLC provide discretionary investment advice with respect to our equity investments. We have retained Oliver Wyman, an independent casualty actuarial consulting firm, to render advice regarding actuarial matters.

OPERATIONS

ThreeSix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 compared to threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011

We recorded a net incomeloss of $82,388$619,147 during the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss of $178,925$594,090 for the same period in 2011. The net incomeloss recorded during the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2012 was largely attributable to (1)operating and management expenses incurred by APSL, which were partially offset by net realized gains on investments (2) increased net premiums and commissionother income, earned and (3) the reduction in operating and management expenses, as discussed below in further detail. The net loss recorded during the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2011 was largely attributable to operating and management expenses incurred by APSL, partially offset by net realized gains on investments.

15


Our net premiums earned duringfor the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2012 were $176,821$453,272 compared to $45,490 during$125,561 for the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $131,331$327,711 or 288.7%261.0%. The net premiums earned during the quarterssix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 were attributable to cessions from C&F under the Reinsurance Agreement. The increase in net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement resulted from increased cessions from C&F in 2012, arising from a higher level of underwriting activity under the Agency Agreement due to the continued successful marketing of the program by APSL.

ForDuring the quarterssix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded commission income under the Agency Agreement of $214,944$405,576 and $72,609,$144,345, respectively, an increase of $142,335$261,231 or 196.0%181.0%. This increase resulted from a higher volume of premiums written under the Agency Agreement in 2012.

14


We recorded other income of $98,156 during the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, which represents (1) a $60,000 refund of non-resident withholding tax that was erroneously deducted from dividend income earned on our equity investment portfolio in prior years and (2) net interest received from PDIC in the amount of $38,156 in relation to funds that were held in deposit by PDIC pursuant to the 2003 excess of loss reinsurance agreement between AMIC Ltd. and PDIC. No other income was recorded for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011.

We recorded net investment income of $95,266 for$207,120 during the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 compared to $95,344$212,825 for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011. The marginal decrease resulted from lower yielding fixeddecline in net investment income securities held in the Company’s investment portfolio during the first quarter of 2012 comparedis due to the same period of 2011, partially offset by the decrease in investment managers’ fees that resulted from the reduction in the amountinvestment portfolio due to sales of assets under management in the total investment portfolio.certain equity securities. The annualized investment yield, calculated as total interest and dividends divided by the net average amount of total investments and cash and cash equivalents, was 1.6%1.7% for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, compared to the 1.4%1.6% yield earned for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011.

Sales of securities during the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 resulted in realized gains on investments net of impairment of $609,093$612,028 compared to $816,768$1,316,139 during the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, a decrease of $207,675$704,111 or 25.4%53.4%. The decrease in realized gains recorded in the first quarter of 2012 primarily related to decreased sales of equity securities in an unrealized gain position compared to 2011 and to other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2012 in the amount of $165,611. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

For the quarterssix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded loss and loss adjustment expenses of $110,514$283,295 and $28,452,$78,466, respectively, derived by multiplying our estimated loss ratio of 62.5% andby the net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement of $176,821$453,272 and $45,490,$125,561, respectively.

We recorded policy acquisition costs of $65,424 in$168,667 during the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $16,831$47,336 for the same period in 2011. Policy acquisition costs, which are primarily ceding commissions paid to the ceding insurer, are established as a percentage of premiums written; therefore, any increase or decrease in premiums written will result in a similar increase or decrease in policy acquisition costs. The policy acquisition costs recorded during the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were approximately 37% of the net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement of $176,821$453,272 and 45,490.$125,561, respectively.

We expensed operating and management expenses of $935,954 in$1,943,337 for the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $1,163,853$2,267,158 for the same period in 2011, a decrease of $227,899$323,821 or 19.6%14.3%. The decline is largely attributable to (1) a reduction in professional and marketing expenses incurred by APSL during the six months to June 30, 2012 compared to 2011 as a result of APSL bringing in-house most of its marketing and promotional work and reducing its reliance on third party contractors and service providers and, (2) a reduction in legal expenses associated with the Arbitration during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.

16


The tables below summarize the results of the following AmerInst operating segments: (1) reinsurance activity, which also includes investments and other activities, and (2) insurance activity, which offers professional liability solutions to professional service firms under the Agency Agreement with C&F.

   Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 
   Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
  Total 

Revenues

  $1,370,328    $405,824   $1,776,152  

Total losses and expenses

   1,126,450     1,268,849    2,395,299  

Segment income (loss)

  $243,878    $(863,025 $(619,147

Identifiable assets

  $—      $648,207   $648,207  
   Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 
   Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
  Total 

Revenues

  $1,654,442    $144,428   $1,798,870  

Total losses and expenses

   908,525     1,484,435    2,392,960  

Segment income (loss)

  $745,917    $(1,340,007 $(594,090

Identifiable assets

  $—      $842,397   $842,397  

Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011

We recorded a net loss of $701,535 during the second quarter of 2012 compared to a net loss of $415,165 for the same period in 2011. The net loss recorded during the second quarter of 2012 was largely attributable to operating and management expenses incurred by APSL, partially offset by net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement and commission income recorded under the Agency Agreement. The net loss recorded during the second quarter of 2011 was largely attributable to operating and management expenses incurred by APSL, partially offset by net realized gains on investments.

Our net premiums earned during the second quarter of 2012 were $276,451 compared to $80,071 during the second quarter of 2011, an increase of $196,380 or 245.3%. The net premiums earned during the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were attributable to cessions from C&F under the Reinsurance Agreement. The increase in net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement resulted from increased cessions from C&F in 2012, arising from a higher level of underwriting activity under the Agency Agreement due to the continued successful marketing of the program by APSL.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded commission income under the Agency Agreement of $190,632 and $71,736, respectively, an increase of $118,896 or 165.7%. This increase resulted from a higher volume of premiums written under the Agency Agreement in 2012.

We recorded net investment income of $111,854 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to $117,481 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The marginal decline in net investment income is due to the reduction in the investment portfolio due to sales of certain equity securities. The annualized investment yield, calculated as total interest and dividends divided by the net average amount of total investments and cash and cash equivalents, was 1.8% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, compared to the 1.8% yield earned for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Sales of securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 resulted in realized gains on investments net of impairment of $2,935 compared to $499,371 during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $496,436 or 99.4%. The decrease in realized gains primarily related to decreased sales of equity securities in an unrealized gain position compared to 2011 and to other-than-temporary impairment charges recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2012 in the amount of $101,422. No other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded loss and loss adjustment expenses of $172,781 and $50,014, respectively, derived by multiplying our estimated loss ratio of 62.5% by the net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement of $276,451 and $80,071, respectively.

We recorded policy acquisition costs of $103,243 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $30,505 for the same period in 2011. Policy acquisition costs, which are primarily ceding commissions paid to the ceding insurer, are established as a percentage of premiums written; therefore, any increase or decrease in premiums written will result in a similar increase or decrease in policy acquisition costs. The policy acquisition costs recorded during the second quarter of 2012 and 2011 were approximately 37% of the net premiums earned under the Reinsurance Agreement of $276,451 and $80,071, respectively.

17


We expensed operating and management expenses of $1,007,383 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $1,103,305 for the same period in 2011, a decrease of $95,922 or 8.7%. The decline is largely attributable to (1) a reduction in professional and marketing expenses incurred by APSL during the quarter compared to 2011 as a result of APSL bringing in-house most of its marketing and promotional work and reducing its reliance on third party contractors and service providers and, (2) a reduction in legal expenses associated with the Arbitration during the quarter compared to the same quarterperiod in 2011.

The tables below summarize the results of the following AmerInst operating segments: (1) reinsurance activity, which also includes investments and other activities, and (2) insurance activity, which offers professional liability solutions to professional service firms under the Agency Agreement with C&F.

 

  Three Months Ended March 31, 2012   Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 
  Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
 Total   Reinsurance
Segment
 Insurance
Segment
 Total 

Revenues

  $979,199    $215,081   $1,194,280    $391,129   $190,743   $581,872  

Total losses and expenses

  $440,423    $671,469   $1,111,892     686,027    597,380    1,283,407  

Segment income (loss)

  $538,776    $(456,388 $82,388  

Segment loss

  $(294,898 $(406,637 $(701,535

Identifiable assets

  $—      $696,995   $696,995    $—     $648,207   $648,207  
  Three Months Ended March 31, 2011   Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 
  Reinsurance
Segment
   Insurance
Segment
 Total   Reinsurance
Segment
 Insurance
Segment
 Total 

Revenues

  $957,558    $72,653   $1,030,211    $696,884   $71,775   $768,659  

Total losses and expenses

  $396,107    $813,029   $1,209,136     512,418    671,406    1,183,824  

Segment income (loss)

  $561,451    $(740,376 $(178,925  $184,466   $(599,631 $(415,165

Identifiable assets

  $—      $730,015   $730,015    $—     $842,397   $842,397  

FINANCIAL CONDITION

As of June 30, 2012, our total investments were $22,957,813, an increase of $212,263, or 0.9%, from $22,745,550 at December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the increase in the fair value of certain equity securities as a result of favorable market conditions, partially offset by the sales of certain equity securities. The cash and cash equivalents balance decreased from $904,485 at December 31, 2011 to $753,542 at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $150,943 or 16.7%. The amount of cash and cash equivalents varies depending on the maturities of fixed term investments and on the level of funds invested in money market funds. The restricted cash and cash equivalents balance decreased from $435,924 at December 31, 2011 to $236,071 at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $199,853 or 45.8%. The decrease is due to the timing of sales and maturities of investments held as restricted cash at June 30, 2012 that have not yet been reinvested. The ratio of cash and total investments to total liabilities at June 30, 2012 was 7.33:1, compared to a ratio of 8.25:1 at December 31, 2011.

The assumed reinsurance balances receivable represents the current assumed premiums receivable less commissions payable to the fronting carriers. As of June 30, 2012, the balance was $235,656 compared to $183,518 as of December 31, 2011. The increase resulted from a higher level of premiums assumed under the Reinsurance Agreement.

The assumed reinsurance payable represents current reinsurance losses payable to the fronting carriers. As of June 30, 2012, the balance was $0 compared to $86,685 as of December 31, 2011. This balance fluctuates due to the timing of reported losses.

Deferred policy acquisition costs, which represent the deferral of ceding commission expense related to premiums not yet earned, increased from $146,226 at December 31, 2011 to $259,698 at June 30, 2012. The increase in deferred policy acquisition costs in 2012 was due to the increase in both net premiums written and unearned premiums assumed under the Reinsurance Agreement compared to the prior year. The ceding commission rate under the Reinsurance Agreement is 37%.

Prepaid expenses and other assets were $488,829 at June 30, 2012, an increase of 29.2% from December 31, 2011. The balance primarily relates to (1) prepaid directors’ and officers’ liability insurance costs, (2) the prepaid directors’ retainer and (3) premiums due to APSL under the Agency Agreement. The increase in the balance was attributable to the directors’ retainer payments made in May 2012 relating to the period from June 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013.

Accrued expenses and other liabilities primarily represent premiums payable by APSL to C&F under the Agency Agreement and expenses accrued relating largely to professional fees. The balance decreased from $1,396,332 at December 31, 2011 to $1,260,701 at June 30, 2012, a decrease of $135,631 or 9.7%. The decrease in the balance was attributable to a decrease in premiums payable by APSL to C&F under the Agency Agreement. This balance fluctuates due to the timing of the premium payments to C&F.

18


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our cash needs consist of settlement of losses and expenses under our reinsurance treaties and funding day-to-day operations. During the continued implementation of our business plan, our management expects to meet these cash needs from cash flows arising from our investment portfolio. Because substantially all of our assets are marketable securities, we expect that we will have sufficient flexibility to provide for unbudgeted cash needs which may arise without resorting to borrowing, subject to regulatory limitations.

15


As of March 31, 2012, our total investments were $23,397,229, an increase of $651,679, or 2.9%, from $22,745,550 at December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the increase in the fair value of certain equity securities as a result of favorable market conditions, partially offset by the sales of certain equity securities. TheTotal cash and cash equivalents balance increasedinvestments decreased from $904,485$24,085,959 at December 31, 2011 to $937,256$23,947,426 at March 31, 2012, an increase of $32,771 or 3.6%. The amount of cash and cash equivalents varies depending on the maturities of fixed term investments and on the level of funds invested in money market funds. The restricted cash and cash equivalents balance decreased from $435,924 at December 31, 2011 to $280,418 at March 31,June 30, 2012, a decrease of $155,506$138,533 or 35.7%0.6%. The net decrease is due to the timing of sales and maturities of investments held as restricted cash at March 31, 2012 that have not yet been reinvested. The ratio of cash and total investments to total liabilities at March 31, 2012 was 8.50:1, compared to a ratio of 8.25:1 at December 31, 2011.

The increase in total cash and investments at March 31, 2012, compared to December 31, 2011 resulted primarily from net cash outflows to fund the operations of APSL and dividends of $156,320 paid during the first quarter of 2012. These cash outflows were partially offset by the increase in the fair value of certain equity securities as a result of favorable market conditions and positive cash inflows in relation to net investment income and net premiums received under the Reinsurance Agreement in the amount of $183,518. These increases were partially offset by net cash outflows to fund the operations of APSL and dividends of $156,320 paid during the first quarter of 2012.

The assumed reinsurance balances receivable represents the current assumed premiums receivable less commissions payable to the fronting carriers. As of March 31, 2012, the balance was $249,260 compared to $183,518 as of December 31, 2011. The increase resulted from a higher level of premiums assumed under the Reinsurance Agreement.

The assumed reinsurance payable represents current reinsurance losses payable to the fronting carriers. As of March 31, 2012, the balance was $0 compared to $86,685 as of December 31, 2011. This balance fluctuates due to the timing of reported losses.

Deferred policy acquisition costs, which represent the deferral of ceding commission expense related to premiums not yet earned, increased from $146,226 at December 31, 2011 to $227,194 at March 31, 2012. The increase in deferred policy acquisition costs in 2012 was due to the increase in both net premiums written and unearned premiums assumed under the Reinsurance Agreement compared to the prior year. The ceding commission rate under the Reinsurance Agreement is 37%.

Prepaid expenses and other assets were $291,153 at March 31, 2012, a decrease of 23.0% from December 31, 2011. The balance primarily relates to (1) prepaid directors’ and officers’ liability insurance costs, (2) prepaid directors’ retainer and (3) premiums due to APSL under the Agency Agreement. The decrease in the balance was attributable to a decrease in premiums due to APSL under the Agency Agreement. This balance fluctuates due to the timing of the premium receipts by APSL.

Accrued expenses and other liabilities primarily represent premiums payable by APSL to C&F under the Agency Agreement and expenses accrued relating largely to professional fees. The balance decreased from $1,396,332 at December 31, 2011 to $1,138,051 at March 31, 2012, a decrease of $258,281 or 18.5%. The decrease in the balance was attributable to a decrease in premiums payable by APSL to C&F under the Agency Agreement. This balance fluctuates due to the timing of the premium payments to C&F.$422,602.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority has authorized Investco to purchase the Company’s common shares from shareholders who have died or retired from the practice of public accounting and on a negotiated basis. During the quartersix months and three months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, no such transactions occurred. Through March 31,June 30, 2012, Investco had purchased 141,526 common shares from shareholders who had died or retired for a total purchase price of $3,860,345. From time to time, Investco has also purchased shares in privately negotiated transactions. Through March 31,June 30, 2012, Investco had purchased an additional 75,069 common shares in such privately negotiated transactions for a total purchase price of $1,109,025.

Cash Dividends

We paid a dividend of $0.25 per share during the first quarter of 2012, which amounted to total ordinary cash dividends of $170,905. The dividends paid during the first quarter of 2012 have been reduced by $14,585, which represents a write back of uncashed dividends issued prior to 2007 to shareholders that we have been unable to locate. Since we began paying dividends in 1995, our original shareholders have received $19.12 in cumulative dividends per share. When measured by a total rate of return calculation, this has resulted in an effective annual rate of return of approximately 9.88%9.70% from the inception of the Company, based on a per share purchase price of $8.33 paid by the original shareholder, and using an unaudited book value of $34.16$32.64 per share as of March 31,June 30, 2012. Although we have paid cash dividends on a regular basis in the past, the declaration and payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on among other things, our financial condition, results of operations, current and anticipated cash needs and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

AmerInst is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.

16


Critical Accounting PoliciesCRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s critical accounting policies are discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. You may read any public document we file with the Commission at the Commission’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference room. The Commission maintains an internet site that contains annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information that issuers (including AmerInst) file electronically with the Commission. The Commission’s internet site iswww.sec.gov.

Our internet site iswww.amerinst.bm. We make available free of charge through our internet site our annual report on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Commission. We also make available, through our internet site, via links to the Commission’s internet site, statements of beneficial ownership of our equity securities filed by our directors, officers, 10% or greater shareholders and others under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, we post onwww.amerinst.bm our Memorandum of Association, our Bye-Laws, our Statement of Share Ownership Policy, Charters for our Audit Committee and Governance and Nominations Committee, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. You can request a copy of these documents, excluding exhibits, at no cost, by writing or telephoning us c/o Cedar Management Limited, 25 Church Street, Continental Building, P.O. Box HM 1601 Hamilton, Bermuda HMGX, Attention: Investor Relations (441) 295-6015. The information on our internet site is not incorporated by reference into this report.

 

1719


Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 31,June 30, 2012, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer each concluded that as of March 31,June 30, 2012, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we maintained effective disclosure controls and procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has reviewed our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

1820


Part II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

We are party to various legal proceedings generally arising in the normal course of our business. While any proceeding contains an element of uncertainty, we do not believe that the eventual outcome of any litigation or arbitration proceeding to which we are presently a party could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or business. Pursuant to our insurance and reinsurance agreements, disputes are generally required to be finally settled by arbitration.

 

Item 1A.Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated in our subsequent quarterly reports. The risks described in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

 

Item 6.Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

31.1    Certification of Stuart H. Grayston pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of Thomas R. McMahon pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of Stuart H. Grayston pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of Thomas R. McMahon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

1921


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: MayAugust 14, 2012 AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.
 (Registrant)
 By: 

  /S//s/ STUART H. GRAYSTON

  Stuart H. Grayston
  President (Principal Executive Officer, duly authorized to sign this Report in such capacity and on behalf of the Registrant)
 By: 

  /S/ THOMAS R. MCMAHON

  Thomas R. McMahon
  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer, duly authorized to sign this Report in such capacity and on behalf of the Registrant)

 

2022


AMERINST INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Filed with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31,June 30, 2012

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

31.1    Certification of Stuart H. Grayston pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2    Certification of Thomas R. McMahon pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1    Certification of Stuart H. Grayston pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2    Certification of Thomas R. McMahon pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

2123