UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended MarchDecember 31, 2014

For the Transition Period From            to

Commission File No. 001-34404

DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY

508 West Wall, Suite 800, Midland, Texas 79701

(Principal Executive Office)

Telephone Number: 432-684-3000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)LOSS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Founded in 1952, the Company acquires and processes 2-D, 3-D and multi-component seismic data for its clients, ranging from major oil and gas companies to independent oil and gas operators as well as providers of multi-client data libraries.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management of the Company, the accompanying unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. The results of operations for the three months and the six months ended MarchDecember 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q report pursuant to certain rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These financial statements should be read with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.2014.

Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires that certain assumptions and estimates be made that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Because of the use of assumptions and estimates inherent in the reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation.The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Dawson Seismic Services Holdings, Inc. and Dawson Seismic Services ULC (“DSS”).ULC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash Equivalents. For purposes of the financial statements, theThe Company considers demand deposits, certificates of deposit, overnight investments, money market funds and all highly liquid financialdebt instruments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.Management prepares its allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on its review of past-due accounts, its past experience of historical write-offs and its current client base. While the collectability of outstanding client invoices is continually assessed, the inherent volatility of the energy industry’s business cycle can cause swift and unpredictable changes in the financial stability of the Company’s clients.

Property, Plant and Equipment.Property, plant and equipment is capitalized at historical cost and depreciated over the useful life of the asset. Management’s estimation of this useful life is based on circumstances that exist in the seismic industry and information available at the time of the purchase of the asset. As circumstances change and new information becomes available, these estimates could change.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the results of operations for the period.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets.Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when triggering events occur that suggest deterioration in the assets’ recoverability or fair value. Recognition of an impairment charge is required if future expected undiscounted net cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets and the fair value of the assets is below the carrying value of the assets. Management’s forecast of future cash flows used to perform impairment analysis includes estimates of future revenues and expenses based on the Company’s anticipated future results while considering anticipated future oil and natural gas prices, which is fundamental in assessing demand for the Company’s services. If the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows, the Company measures the amount of possible impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the assets to the fair value.

Leases.The Company leases certain equipment and vehicles under lease agreements. The Company evaluates each lease to determine its appropriate classification as an operating or capital lease for financial reporting purposes. Any lease that does not meet the criteria for a capital lease is accounted for as an operating lease. The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair market value of the related assets. Assets under capital leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the initial lease term. Amortization of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.

Revenue Recognition. Services are provided under cancelable service contracts. These contracts are either “turnkey” or “term” agreements. Under both types of agreements, the Company recognizes revenues when revenue is realizable and services have been performed. Services are defined as the commencement of data acquisition or processing operations. Revenues are considered realizable when earned according to the terms of the service contracts. Under turnkey agreements, revenue is recognized on a per unit of data acquired rate as services are performed. Under term agreements, revenue is recognized on a per unit of time worked rate as services are performed. In the case of a cancelled service contract, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed for services performed up to the date of cancellation.

The Company receives reimbursements for certain out-of-pocket expenses under the terms of the service contracts. Amounts billed to clients are recorded in revenue at the gross amount, including out-of-pocket expenses that are reimbursed by the client.

In some instances, customers are billed in advance of services performed. In those cases, the Company recognizes the liability as deferred revenue. As services are performed, those deferred revenue amounts are recognized as revenue.

In some instances, the contract contains certain permitting, surveying and drilling costs that are incorporated into the per unit of data acquired rate. In these circumstances, associatedthese set up costs incurredthat occur prior to initiating revenue recognition are deferredcapitalized and amortized as services are provided.

Stock-Based Compensation.The Company measures all employee stock-based compensation awards, which include, stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units, stock options and common stock awards, using the fair value method and recognizes compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, in its consolidated financial statements. The Company records compensation expense as either operating or general and administrative expense as appropriate in the Consolidated Statements of Operations ofand Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the related stock options, restricted stock awards or restricted stock unit awards.options.

Foreign Currency Translation. The U.S. Dollar is the reporting currency for all periods presented. The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is generally the local currency. All assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Income and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. Equity transactions are translated using historical exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from translation are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency gains (losses) are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Income Taxes.The Company accounts for income taxes by recognizing amounts of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and by using an asset and liability approach in recognizing the amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Management determines deferred taxes by identifying the types and amounts of existing temporary differences, measuring the total deferred tax asset or liability using the applicable tax rate in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates ofon deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the year of an enacted rate change. The deferred tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management’s methodology for recording income taxes requires judgment regarding assumptions and the use of estimates, including determining the annual effective tax rate and the valuation of deferred tax assets, which can create variances between actual results and estimates and could have a material impact on the Company’s provision or benefit for income taxes. The Company’s effective tax rates differ from the statutory federal rate of 35% for certain items such as state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses, discrete items and expenses related to share-based compensation that arewere not expected to result in a tax deduction.

Reclassifications. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassifiedUse of Estimates in the current yearPreparation of Financial Statements. Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in orderconformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to be consistent withmake estimates and assumptions that affect the current year presentation.reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Because of the use of assumptions and estimates inherent in the reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

None.In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 that introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified approach to adoptASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements and the method of adoption.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern” (Subtopic 205-40). This ASU provides guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and in certain circumstances to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance, however does not expect any impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company had short-term investments at MarchDecember 31, 2014 and September 30, 20132014 consisting of certificates of deposit with original maturities greater than three months, but less than a year. Certificates of deposit are limited to one per banking institution and no single investment exceeded the FDIC insurance limit at MarchDecember 31, 2014 or September 30, 2013.2014.

4. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

At MarchDecember 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013,2014, the Company’s financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments in certificates of deposit, trade and other receivables, other current assets, accounts payable, other current liabilities, the Term Note, the Second Term Note, the Third Term Note and the DSS Term Note (each as defined below). Due to the short-term maturities of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments in certificates of deposit, trade and other receivables, other current assets, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value at the respective balance sheet dates. The carrying value of the Company’s Term Note, Second Term Note and Third Term Note approximate theirapproximates its fair value due to the fact that the interest rates on the Term Note, Second Term Note and Third Term Note areis reset each month based on the prevailing market interest rate. The carrying value of the Company’s Third Term Note and DSS Term Note approximates itsapproximate their fair value based on a comparison with the prevailing market interest rate. Due to the short-term maturities of the Company’s investments in certificates of deposit, the carrying amounts approximate fair value at the respective balance sheet dates. The fair values of the Company’s notes payable and investments in certificates of deposit are Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy.

5. DEBT

The Company’s revolving line of credit loan agreement is with Western NationalFrost Bank. The agreement was renewed June 2, 2013 under the same terms as the previous agreement. The agreement permits the Company to borrow, repay and reborrow, from time to time until June 2, 2015, up to $20.0 million based on the borrowing base calculation as defined in the agreement. The Company’s obligations under this agreement are secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral. Interest on the facility accrues at an annual rate equal to either the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus two and one-quarter percent, or the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, as the Company directs monthly, subject to an interest rate floor of 4%. Interest on the outstanding amount under the loan agreement is payable monthly. The loan agreement contains customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on disposition of assets, mergers and reorganizations. The Company is also obligated to meet certain financial covenants under the loan agreement, including maintaining specified ratios with respect to cash flow coverage, current assets and liabilities and debt to tangible net worth. The Company was in compliance with all covenants including specified ratios as of MarchDecember 31, 2014 and has the full line of credit available for borrowing. The Company hasdid not utilizedutilize the revolving line of credit during the current fiscal year or the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.2014.

The Company’s credit loan agreement includes a term loan feature under which the Company has threetwo outstanding term loans. The first two term loans were confirmed and brought under the renewed credit loan agreement in June 2013, while the other term loan was entered into in December 2013. In June 2011, the Company entered into the first term loan by obtaining $16,427,000 in financing for the purchase of Geospace Technologies GSR equipment (“Term Note”). The Term Note is repayable over a period of 36 months at $485,444 per month plus any applicable interest in excess of 4%. Interest on the Term Note accrues at an annual rate equalwas repaid according to either the 30-day LIBOR, plus two and one-quarter percent, or the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, as the Company directs monthly, subject to an interest rate floor of 4%, and otherwise has the sameits terms as the revolving line of credit. The Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in the Company’s accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral and matures with all outstanding balances due on June 30, 2014.

In May 2012, the Company entered into a Multiple Advance Term Note (“Second Term Note”) under its credit loan agreement. TheSubject to the terms of the Third Term Note described below, the Second Term Note allows the Company to borrow from time to time up to $15.0 million to purchase equipment. The outstanding principal under the Second Term Note is amortized over a period of 36 months. The Second Term Note bears interest at an annual rate equal to either the 30-day LIBOR, plus two and one-quarter percent, or the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, as the Company directs monthly, subject to an interest rate floor of 3.75%, and otherwise has the same terms as the revolving line of credit. In July 2012, the Company borrowed $9,346,000 under the Second Term Note to purchase Geospace Technologies GSR recording equipment. The Second Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in the Company’s accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral and matures with all outstanding balances due on May 2, 2015.

In July 2012, the Company borrowed $9,346,000 under the Second Term Note to purchase Geospace Technologies GSR recording equipment.

On December 4, 2013, the Company entered into a second Multiple Advance Term Note dated as of December 2, 2013 (“Third Term Note”) under its credit loan agreement. The Third Term Note allows the Company to borrow from time to time up to $10.0 million to purchase equipment. Per the agreement, the Company will be unable to receive an advance for the remainder of the $15.0 million balance of the Second Term Note. The outstanding principal under the Third Term Note is amortized over a period of 36 months. The Third Term Note bears interest at an annual fixed rate equal to 3.16%, and otherwise has the same terms as the revolving line of credit. In December 2013, the Company borrowed the full amount of $10.0 million under the Third Term Note to purchase Geospace Technologies GSX recording equipment. The Third Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in the Company’s accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral and matures with all outstanding balances due on December 2, 2016. On December 5, 2013, the Company borrowed the full amount of $10.0 million under the Third Term Note to purchase Geospace Technologies GSX recording equipment.

In February 2013, the Company’s subsidiary DSS entered into a promissory note (“DSS Term Note”) with Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Company. DSS obtained $983,000 in financing for the purchase of equipment. The DSS Term Note is repayable over a period of 36 months at $28,980 per month and bears interest at an implied annual fixed rate of 3.84%. The DSS Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in the DSS equipment and matures with all outstanding balances due on February 5, 2016.

During fiscal 2012, the Company began leasing vehicles from Enterprise Fleet Management under capital leases. These capital lease obligations are payable in 36 to 60 monthly installments and mature between December 2014 and November 2017. At MarchDecember 31, 2014, the Company had leased 101112 vehicles under these capital leases.

The Company’s notes payable and obligations under capital leases consist of the following:

The aggregate maturities of the notes payable and obligations under capital leases at MarchDecember 31, 2014 are as follows:

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the Company cannot predict the outcomes of any such legal proceedings, management believes that the resolution of pending legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, as the Company believes it is adequately indemnified and insured.insured.

The Company experiences contractual disputes with its clients from time to time regarding the payment of invoices or other matters. While the Company seeks to minimize these disputes and maintain good relations with its clients, the Company has in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, disputes that could affect its revenues and results of operations in any period.

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases for office space in Midland, Houston, Denver, Oklahoma City, Pittsburgh and Calgary, Alberta.

The following table summarizes payments due in specific periods related to the Company’s contractual obligations with initial terms exceeding one year as of MarchDecember 31, 2014.

Some of the Company’s operating leases contain predetermined fixed increases of the minimum rental rate during the initial lease term. For these leases, the Company recognizes the related expense on a straight-line basis and records deferred rent as the difference between the amount charged to expense and the rent paid. Rental expense under the Company’s operating leases with initial terms exceeding one year was $242,000 and $222,000$240,000 for the three monthsmonth periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively and $482,000 and $444,000 for the six months ended MarchDecember 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

As of MarchDecember 31, 2014, the Company had unused letters of credit totaling approximately $580,000.$233,000. The Company’s unused letters of credit principally back obligations associated with the Company’s self-insured retention on workers’ compensation claims. The Company was no longer self-insured for workers’ compensation claims after October 1, 2011. The unused letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2014 are associated with workers’ compensation claims outstanding prior to October 1, 2011.

7. NET (LOSS) INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK

Net (loss) income (loss) per share attributable to common stock is calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an allocation method of calculating (loss) earnings per share when a company’s capital structure includes participating securities that have rights to undistributed earnings. The Company’s employees and officers that hold unvested restricted stock are entitled to dividends onwhen the same terms as the Company’s shareholders holding unrestricted common stock.Company pays dividends.

The Company’s basic net (loss) income (loss) per share attributable to common stock is computed by reducing the Company’s net (loss) income by the net (loss) income allocable to unvested restricted stockholders that have a right to participate in undistributed earnings. The Company’s employees and officers that hold unvested restricted stock do not participate in losses because they are not contractually obligated to do so. Accordingly, no losses are allocated to these unvested restricted stockholders. The undistributed earnings are allocated based on the relative percentage of the weighted average number of unvested restricted stock awards relative to the total of the weighted average common shares outstanding and the weighted average number of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding.awards. The basic net (loss) income (loss) per share attributable to common stock is computed by dividing the net (loss) income (loss) attributable to common stock by the weighted average shares outstanding. The Company’s dilutive net (loss) income (loss) per share attributable to common stock is computed by adjusting basic net (loss) income (loss) per share attributable to common stock by diluted (loss) income allocable to unvested restricted stock divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding. A reconciliation of the basic and diluted income (loss) earningsloss per share attributable to common stock is as follows:

The Company had a net loss forin the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2014.2014 and 2013. As a result, all stock options and restricted stock units were anti-dilutive and excluded from weighted average shares used in determining the numerator for diluted loss per share attributable to common stock is the same as for basic loss per share attributable to common stock and the denominator for diluted loss per share attributable to common stock is the same as the denominator for basic loss per share attributable toof common stock for this period.the respective periods.

The following weighted average numbers of certain securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss)loss per share attributable to common stock, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.anti-dilutive:

There were no securities that had an anti-dilutive effect on the calculationShares of diluted income (loss) attributable to103,500 unvested restricted stock at December 31, 2014 and 2013 are included in common stock foroutstanding as such shares have a nonforfeitable right to participate in any dividends that might be declared and have the quarter ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.right to vote.

8. DIVIDENDSQUARTERLY DIVIDEND

Quarterly Dividend

On February 3, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the commencement of the payment of an $0.08 per share quarterly cash dividend to shareholders, subject to capital availability and a determination that cash dividends continue to be in the best interest of the Company. The first such quarterly dividend wasQuarterly dividends were paid on February 24, 2014, May 30, 2014, August 29, 2014 and December 8, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 14, 2014, May 16, 2014, August 15, 2014 and November 24, 2014, respectively, representing an aggregate dividend of approximately $645,000 based on the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the declaration date, or approximately $2,580,000 on an annualized basis.

The BoardNo determination has been made regarding the payment of Directors may from time to time, in conjunction with management, evaluate supplemental dividend payments depending ondividends following the Company’s pending merger transaction with TGC, as described below.

9. PENDING MERGER TRANSACTION

On October 8, 2014, the Company entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with TGC Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation (“TGC”), and Riptide Acquisition Corp., a Texas corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of TGC (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company continuing after the merger as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of TGC (the “Merger”).

The Merger Agreement has been approved by both companies’ boards of directors. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”) TGC will amend its certificate of formation to change its name to “Dawson Geophysical Company.” Immediately prior to the Effective Time, TGC will effect a reverse stock split with respect to its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“TGC Common Stock”), on a one-for-three ratio (the “Reverse Stock Split”) to reduce the total number of shares of TGC Common Stock outstanding from approximately 22,001,125 to approximately 7,333,708. After giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, in connection with the Merger each issued and outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.33-1/3 per share of the Company (the “Company Common Stock”) (other than shares of Company Common Stock owned by TGC, Merger Sub or the Company or any wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) will be automatically converted into the right to receive 1.760 shares of TGC split-effected Common Stock.

The parties have made customary representations and warranties and agreed to customary covenants in the Merger Agreement. In addition, the Company and TGC have each agreed to certain pre-closing covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among other things, covenants that the Company and TGC will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, during the period between the date of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, conduct its business only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and that each of the Company and TGC will not engage in certain types of transactions without the consent of the other during such period.

The Company is required to pay TGC a termination fee of $2.0 million in the event the Merger Agreement is terminated because:

Furthermore, either the Company or TGC will have to pay to the other party out-of-pocket expenses, including all fees and expenses payable to all legal, accounting, financial, results, capital requirementspublic relations and overall marketother professional advisors arising out of, in connection with, or related to the Merger, up to a maximum of $1.5 million in the aggregate, if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances.

The special meetings of the shareholders of the Company and TGC have been scheduled for February 9, 2015. Completion of the Merger is subject to certain customary conditions.

9.10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 5, 2014,January 7, 2015, Andrew Speese, through his attorney, filed a purported shareholder class action and derivative action on behalf of himself and our other shareholders in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Midland/Odessa Division), against the Company, the Company’s Boardcurrent directors, TGC and Merger Sub relating to the pending merger transaction with TGC. For a discussion of Directors approved the payment of an $0.08 per share quarterly cash dividendthis litigation, please refer to Company’s shareholders of record at the close of business on May 16, 2014. The quarterly dividend represents an aggregate distribution of approximately $645,000 based on outstanding number of shares of Common Stock as of the declaration date, or approximately $2,580,000 on an annualized basis.“Part II. Other Information—Item 1. Legal Proceedings.”

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Forward Looking Statements

Statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q that relate to forecasts, estimates or other expectations regarding future events, including without limitation, statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding technological advancements and our financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of our management for future operations, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used in this Form 10-Q, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to the volatility of oil and natural gas prices, dependence upon energy industry spending, industry competition, delays, reductions or cancellations of service contracts, reduced utilization, crew productivity, the type of contracts we enter into, external factors affecting our crews such as weather interruptions and inability to obtain land access rights of way, disruptions in the global economy, high fixed costs of our operations and our high capital requirements, limited number of clients, credit risk related to our clients, the availability of capital resources, operational disruptions, the possibility that our proposed business combination with TGC Industries, Inc. does not close when expected or at all because required shareholder or other approvals and operational disruptions.other conditions to closing are not received or satisfied on a timely basis or at all, the risk that the benefits from the business combination may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected, the ability to promptly and effectively integrate our business and the business of TGC Industries, Inc., the ability to realize anticipated synergies and cost savings from the transaction, the reaction of the companies’ customers, employees and counterparties to the transaction and the diversion of management time on transaction-related issues. A discussion of these factors, including risks and uncertainties, is set forth under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 20132014 and in our other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategies and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. We assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a leading provider of onshore seismic data acquisition services in the lower 48 states of the United States. During 2012, we entered the Canadian market by forming a new Canadian subsidiary that began operations during the 2012 – 2013 winter season.seasons. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the seismic data acquisition services we provide to our clients, mainly domestic oil and natural gas companies. Demand for our services depends upon the level of spending by these companies for exploration, production, development and field management activities, which depends, in part, on oil and natural gas prices. Significant fluctuations in domestic oil and natural gas exploration activities and commodity prices have affected the demand for our services and our results of operations in years past, and such fluctuations continue to be the single most important factor affecting our business and results of operations.

During the majority of the 2012 fiscal year, we operated fourteen data acquisition crews. During fiscalquarter ended December 31, 2013, we mostly operated fourteen data acquisition crews, except increws. During the last fiscal quarter of 2013 when demand dictated we operateended December 31, 2014, the Company operated eight to ten data acquisition crews. In the middle of first fiscal quarter 2014, we returned to full deployment of twelve data acquisition crews which we maintained through the second fiscal quarter of 2014. We have maintained a balanced order book in terms of the client mix and geographical diversity with the majority of the projects in oil and liquids-rich basins. The majority of our crews are currently working in oil producing basins. However, in recent years, we have experienced periods in which the services we provided were primarily to clients seeking natural gas.

While our revenues are mainly affected by the level of client demand for our services, our revenues are also affected by the pricing for our services that we negotiate with our clients and the productivity and utilization level of our data acquisition crews. Factors impacting productivity and utilization levels include crew downtime related to inclement weather, delays in acquiring land access permits, agricultural or hunting activity, holiday schedules, short winter days, crew repositioning or equipment failure, whether we enter into turnkey or term contracts with our clients, the number and size of crews and the number of recording channels per crew. To the extent we experience these factors, our operating results may be affected from quarter to quarter. Consequently, our efforts to negotiate more favorable contract terms in our supplemental service agreements, to mitigate permit access permit delays and to improve overall crew productivity may contribute to growth in our revenues.

Demand for our services continues to be steadysoftened during the first fiscal quarter of 2015 and into the second fiscal quarter as a result weof the recent drop in oil prices and cutbacks in client spending levels. We have continued to negotiate favorable contract terms during fiscal 2012, 2013experienced several project postponements and during the first six months of fiscal 2014. Although our clients may cancel, delay or alter their service contracts on short notice and we continue to remain subject to land access permit and weather delays,cancellations. Despite current market conditions, we anticipate a demand level sufficientoperating nine to maintaineleven data acquisition crews into the operationsecond quarter of an average of twelve crews fromcalendar 2015 and eight to nine into the middle of the third quarter of 2014 into fiscalcalendar 2015. However, project readiness and delays continue to be intermittent issues and, as a result, our utilization is expected to be negatively impacted on five crewsWe anticipate limited Canadian activity for the first half of the third fiscal quarter of 2014. We anticipate returning to full utilization of twelve crews during the second half of the third fiscal quarter in the United States.2014/2015 winter season.

Currently, most of our client contracts are turnkey contracts. The percentage of revenues derived from turnkey contracts has represented approximately three-quarters of our revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, throughout fiscal 2014 and for the past few years. While turnkey contracts allow us to capitalize on improved crew productivity, we also bear more risks related to weather and crew downtime. We expect the percentage of turnkey contracts to remain high as we continue to expand our operations in the mid-continent, western and southwestern regions of the United States in which turnkey contracts are more common.

Over time, we have experienced continued increases in recording channel capacity on a per crew or project basis. This increase in channel count demand is driven by client needs and is necessary in order to produce higher resolution images, increase crew efficiencies and undertake larger scale projects. Due to the increase in demand for higher channel counts, we have continued our investments in additional channels. In response to project-based channel requirements, we routinely deploy a variable number of channels on a variable number of crews in an effort to maximize asset utilization and meet client needs. We believe we will realize the benefit of increased channel counts and flexibility of deployment through increased crew efficiencies, higher revenues and margins.

Reimbursable third-party charges related to our use of helicopter support services, permit support services, specialized survey technologies and dynamite energy sources in areas with limited access are another important factor affecting our results. Revenues associated with third-party charges declined as a percentage of revenue during fiscal 2012 and 2013 as a result of such third-party charges falling withinat or below our historical average. This trend continued during fiscal 2014 and the first and secondquarter of fiscal quarters of 2014.2015. We expect that as we continue to expand our operations in the more open terrain of the mid-continent, western and southwestern regions of the United States, the level of these third-party charges will continue to be generally within or below our historical range of 25% to 35% of revenue.

As a result of the introduction of the cable-less recording systems in 2012 and 2013,through 2014, we have realized increased crew efficiencies and increased revenue on projects using these cable-less technologies. In response to the continued demand for cable-less recording systems, in the first quarter of fiscal 20132014 we purchased 2,500 channels of Wireless Seismic RT System 2, 12,000 single-channel Geospace Technologies GSX units, 225 four-channel Geospace Technologies GSR units and 1,0009,000 three-channel Geospace Technologies GSX units, bringing our total fiscal 20132014 investment in cable-less recording channels to 18,400. This investment continued during the first quarter of 2014 as we took delivery of an additional 9,000 stations of three-channel Geospace Technologies GSX units.27,000. As we have replaced cable-based recording equipment with cable-less equipment on certain crews, the ARAM cable-based recording equipment continues to be deployed on existing crews as needed and we continue to phase out the older I/O RSR recording systems.needed. Of the twelve largeeleven crews currently in operation, one uses the Wireless Seismic RT System 2, six use Geospace Technologies GSR recording systems and fivefour use ARAM cable-based recording systems. During the second fiscal quarter of 2014, we worked on a large project that continues in southern New Mexico utilizing the FairfieldNodal ZLand cable-less recording system. From time to time as demand dictates we use a Wireless Seismic RT System 2 recording system for small 2-D and 3D projects as well as microseismic applications.

During 2012, we entered into the Canadian market. This market is highly seasonal and operates primarily from late November through March, depending upon weather conditions. We operated one crew on two large multi-component projects during the 2013-2014 winter season. Demand in Canada was softer than anticipated for the second consecutive winter season. Although we do not expect the Canadian operations to have a significant impact on our fiscal 2014 financial results, these operations negatively impacted our financial results in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and the first six months of fiscal 2014.

During fiscal 2012, we began providing surface-recorded microseismic services to some of our clients. Microseismic monitoring is used by clients who use hydraulic fracturing to extract hydrocarbon deposits. We completed several projects in fiscal 2013 and believe our microseismic business will continue to provide growth opportunities. These operations did not have a significant impact on our fiscal 2013 financial results, nor do we expect these operations to significantly impact our fiscal 2014 financial results.

While the markets for oil and natural gas have been very volatile and are likely to continue to be so in the future, and we can make no assurances as to future levels of domestic exploration or commodity prices, we believe opportunities exist for us to enhance our market position by responding to our clients’ continuing desire for higher resolution subsurface images. If economic conditions were to weaken, our customersclients reduce their capital expenditures or there is a significant sustained drop in oil and natural gas prices, it would result in diminished demand for our seismic services, could cause downward pressure on the prices we charge and would affect our results of operations.

Results of Operations

Operating Revenues. Our operating revenues for the first three months of fiscal 2015 decreased by approximately 8% during25% to $50,802,000 from $68,181,000 in the secondfirst three months of fiscal 2014. The revenue decrease was primarily the result of significant reduction in utilization rates in the current quarter due to delays in securing land access agreements, short term project delays on behalf of the Company’s clients and extraordinary weather conditions in several areas of operation late in the quarter and the softened demand for our services late in the quarter as result of the recent drop in oil prices and cutbacks in client spending levels as described above. Reimbursed third-party charges as a percentage of revenues remained within our historical range for such charges, although reimbursed third-party charges in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to $76,766,0002015 were at the low end of the historical range as compared to $83,350,000being at the high end of the historical range in the samefirst quarter of fiscal 2013 and decreased by approximately 9% during the first six months of fiscal 2014 to $144,947,000 as compared to $159,979,000 in the same period of fiscal 2013, primarily as a result of a reduction in the average number of active crews in the United States from fourteen large channel count crews and one small channel count crew to twelve crews as well as intermittent weather related crew interruptions in a few areas of operation. Third-party charges, for which we are reimbursed by clients, decreased significantly during the second quarter of 2014 but remained fairly constant during the first six months of fiscal 2014 as compared to the respective prior periods. The movement of our operations towards the more open terrain of the western United States where there is less need for drilling and helicopter services resulted in reduced third party charges.2014.

Operating Costs. Operating expenses for the second quarter and first sixthree months of fiscal 2014 increased nominally to $60,091,000 and $119,199,000 as2015 were $42,957,000 compared to $59,666,000 and $118,401,000, respectively,$59,108,000 for the same periodsperiod of fiscal 2013. Although the dollar amounts of operating costs were generally consistent between the corresponding periods of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, our costs associated with reimbursed expenses decreased during the second quarter and first six months of 2014 compared2014. The primary contributing factor to the corresponding periods of 2013. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in operating expenses was the decrease in reimbursed third party charges. Operating expenses excluding third-partythird party charges decreased slightly during the secondfirst quarter and first six months of fiscal 20142015 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod of fiscal 2013. The increase2014 but not in proportion to the reduction in revenue. Although the dollar amount of operating costs excluding third partydecreased between the two periods, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue and the reimbursed third-party charges component of such operating costs as a percentage of revenue both increased between periods due to reduced revenue. These increases in reimbursed third-party charges and expenses as a percentage of revenue had the effect of reducing margins in the second fiscal quarter and first sixthree months of fiscal 2014 was primarily the result of significant increases in costs on the Canadian project initially scheduled for completion in early December 2013, which was extended into early February 2014 due to excessive snowfall and operational difficulties. Our operating expenses excluding third party charges also increased in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 20142015 as a result of increased costs associated with field personnel and equipment rental compared to the prior periods, including routine startup costs on several projects in the United States. As discussed above, reimbursed expenses have a similar impact on operating expenses.quarter ended December 31, 2013.

General and administrative expenses were 4.8% and 5.4%10.0% of revenues in the second quarter and first sixthree months of fiscal 2014, respectively,2015 compared to 4.2% and 4.4%6.1% of revenues in the same periodsperiod of fiscal 2013. General2014. The dollar amount of general and administrative expenses increased to $3,676,000$5,093,000 during the secondfirst quarter of fiscal 20142015 from $3,508,000 during the same period of fiscal 2013 and increased to $7,840,000$4,164,000 during the first six monthsquarter of fiscal 2014 from $7,104,000 during2014. The primary factor for the first six months of fiscal 2013. The increase in expenses was primarily associated with increased business development costs in the current quarter as compared to the prior year quarter. We anticipate that we will experience increased general and administrative expenses as compared to prior periods overwas transaction costs associated with the next year as we implement our new enterprise resource planning system.pending merger transaction with TGC Industries, Inc.

Depreciation for the second fiscal quarter of 2014 and sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2014 totaled $10,177,000 and $20,053,000, respectively,$9,736,000 compared to $9,578,000 and $18,682,000$9,876,000 for the second fiscal quarter and first sixthree months of fiscal 2013, respectively.ended December 31, 2013. The increaseslight decrease in depreciation expense is the result of fewer capital expenditures we made during the fiscal 2013 and to-date in fiscal 2014.year. Our depreciation expense is expected to continue to increaseremain flat during fiscal 2014, reflecting our higher2015 primarily due to maintenance capital expenditures during fiscal 2013 and in the six months just ended.remaining at levels to maintain our existing asset base.

Our total operating costs for the second quarter and first sixthree months of fiscal 20142015 were $73,944,000 and $147,092,000 which represented nominal increases as compared to$57,786,000, a decrease of 21% from the second quarter and first sixthree months of fiscal 2013. These increases were2014. The decrease in the first three months of fiscal 2015 was primarily due to the factors described above.

Income Taxes. Income tax benefit was $1,550,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2014 compared to income tax expense of $6,433,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2013. Income tax expense was $687,000$2,138,000 and $2,237,000 for the three months ended MarchDecember 31, 2014 compared to income tax expense of $4,302,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.and 2013, respectively. The effective tax rates for the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately 55.5%30.9% and 41.1%43.5%, respectively. Our effective tax rate increased as compared to the prior period due to profits before taxes being closer to break even thus permanent items and state taxes had an increased impact on our effective rate. Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory federal rate of 35% for certain items such as foreign operations, state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses, discrete items and expenses related to share-based compensation that were not expected to result in a tax deduction and changes in reserves for uncertain tax positions.deduction.

Use of EBITDA (Non-GAAP measure)

We define EBITDA as net (loss) income (loss) plus interest expense, interest income, income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense. Our management uses EBITDA as a supplemental financial measure to assess:

We also understand that such data are used by investors to assess our performance. However, the term EBITDA is not defined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and EBITDA is not a measure of operating income, operating performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. When assessing our operating performance or liquidity, investors and others should not consider this data in isolation or as a substitute for net (loss) income, (loss), cash flow from operating activities or other cash flow data calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA or similarly titled measures utilized by other companies since such other companies may not calculate EBITDA in the same manner as we calculate.us. Further, the results presented by EBITDA cannot be achieved without incurring the costs that the measure excludes: interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

The reconciliation of our EBITDA to our net income (loss)loss and net cash provided byused in operating activities, which are the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, are provided in the tables below:

Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income (Loss)Loss

Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Cash Provided byused in Operating Activities

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Introduction.Our principal sources of cash are amounts earned from the seismic data acquisition services we provide to our clients. Our principal uses of cash are the amounts used to provide these services, including expenses related to our operations and acquiring new equipment. Accordingly, our cash position depends (as do our revenues) on the level of demand for our services. In recent years,Historically, cash generated from our operations along with cash reserves and borrowings from commercial banks have been sufficient to fund our working capital requirements and, to some extent, our capital expenditures.

Cash Flows.Net cash provided byused in operating activities was $1,641,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2014$1,683,000 and $12,413,000 in the six months ended March 31, 2013. Net cash provided by operating activities$21,709,000 for the first sixthree months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, wasrespectively. These amounts primarily impacted byreflect our decline in revenues during the period. This declinefirst three months ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in revenues during the first sixthree months fiscalended December 31, 2014 was not matched by a decrease in overall operating costsexpenses and, as a result, our margins and net results from operating activities were negatively affected. Net cash provided by operating activitiesIn fiscal 2014 for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, there was positively impacted in the six months ended March 31, 2104 by ana significant increase in amounts received in advance of services performed. Despite the fact that we have had an increase in our outstanding receivables, our collection experience as an average number of days in accounts receivable has remained at approximately sixty during the last twelve months. We believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts of $250,000 at March 31, 2014 is adequate to cover exposures related to our trade account balances.receivable.

Net cash used byin investing activities was $31,038,000$3,674,000 in the sixfirst three months ended March 31, 2014of fiscal 2015 and $48,686,000$26,331,000 in the sixfirst three months ended March 31, 2013.of fiscal 2014. The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 20142015 primarily represents capital expenditures of $30,205,000,$2,555,000, net of noncashnon-cash capital expenditures and noncash capital lease obligations, made from excess cash reserves and financing proceeds discussed below. Short-term investments of $17,250,000 in certificates of deposit were also made from maturities of $16,250,000 in certificates of deposit and excess cash reverses.reserves. In fiscal 2013,2014, excess cash reserves and financing proceeds from the note payable discussed below were used to fund capital expenditures of $40,147,000$23,835,000, net of noncashnon-cash capital expendituresexpenditures. Short-term investments of $9,500,000 and noncash capital lease obligations. Also$10,500,000 in certificates of deposit were made during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we invested $11,750,000 in short term investments2015 and 2014, respectively, from excess cash reserves and $3,000,000 in maturities of short term investments.certificates of deposit of $7,750,000 and $8,000,000, respectively.

Net cash used in financing activities in the first three months of fiscal 2015 of $2,717,000 included principal payments on our Second Term Note, Third Term Note, DSS Term Note and capital leases of $2,071,000. In the first three months of fiscal 2014, net cash provided by financing activities was $3,488,000 in the six months ended March 31, 2014 while net cash used by financing activities was $3,448,000 in the six months ended March 31, 2013. Financing activities in the first six months of fiscal 2014 included the proceeds of $10,000,000 from our Third Term Note, which weNote. We used these funds to supplement the purchase of Geospace Technologies GSX recording equipment (as discussed below). Inequipment. During the first sixthree months of fiscal 2014, financing activities also included principal$2,519,000 in principle payments totaling $5,448,000 on our Term Note, Second Term Note, Third Term Note and DSS Term Note. Also during the second quarter fiscal of 2014, our Board of Directors declared and paid $645,000 in quarterly cash dividends to our shareholders. For further discussion of this regular quarterly dividend, see footnote 8 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements (unaudited). In the first six months of fiscal 2013, financing activities included proceeds from our DSS Term Note and $4,343,000 in principal payments on our Term Note and Second Term Note.capital leases.

Capital Expenditures.Our Board of Directors has approved a fiscal 20142015 capital budget of $35,000,000.$10,000,000. To date, $32,430,000$3,258,000 of the capital budget has been spent for the purchase of 9,000 GSX three-channel recording units, 10,000 three-channel geophones and vehicles to improve our fleet.maintenance capital purposes. The remaining balance of the capital budget will be used for maintenance capital purposes. We believe these expenditures will allow us to maintain our competitive position as we respond to our client’s desire for higher resolution subsurface images.

We continually strive to supply our clients with technologically advanced 3-D seismic data acquisition recording systems and data processing capabilities. We maintain equipment in and out of service in anticipation of increased future demand for our services.

Capital Resources.In recent years,Historically, we have primarily relied on cash generated from operations, cash reserves and borrowings from commercial banks to fund our working capital requirements and, to some extent, our capital expenditures. Recently, we have funded some of our capital expenditures through equipment term loans and capital leases. Historically, weWe have also funded our capital expenditures and other financing needs from time to time through public equity offerings.

Our revolving line of credit loan agreement is with Western NationalFrost Bank. The agreement was renewed June 2, 2013 under the same terms as the previous agreement and permits us to borrow, repay and reborrow, from time to time until June 2, 2015, up to $20.0 million based on the borrowing base calculation as defined in the agreement. Our obligations under this agreement are secured by a security interest in our accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral. Interest on the facility accrues at an annual rate equal to either the 30-day LIBOR,London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus two and one-quarter percent, or the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, as we direct monthly, subject to an interest rate floor of 4%. Interest on the outstanding amount under the loan agreement is payable monthly. The loan agreement contains customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on disposition of assets, mergers and reorganizations. We are also obligated to meet certain financial covenants under the loan agreement, including maintaining specified ratios with respect to cash flow coverage, current assets and liabilities and debt to tangible net worth. We were in compliance with all covenants including specified ratios as of MarchDecember 31, 2014 and have the full line of credit available for borrowing. We didhave not utilizeutilized the revolving line of credit during the first six months ending March 31, 2014 of the current fiscal year or the fiscal yearyears ended September 30, 2013.2014 or the first three months of fiscal year 2015.

Our credit loan agreement includes a term loan feature under which we have three outstandingincludes two current term loans. The first two term loans were confirmed and brought under the renewed credit loan agreement in June 2013, while the other term loan was entered into in December 2013. In June 2011, we entered into the first Term Note by obtaining $16,427,000 in financing for the purchase of Geospace Technologies GSR equipment. The Term Note is repayable over a period of 36 months at $485,444 per month plus any applicable interest in excess of 4%. The Term Note bears interest at an annual rate equalwhich was repaid according to either the 30-day LIBOR, plus twoits terms and one-quarter percent, or the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, as we direct monthly, subject to an interest rate floor of 4%, and otherwise has the same terms as our revolving line of credit. The Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in our accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral and matures with all outstanding balances duematured on June 30, 2014.

In May 2012, we entered into the Second Term Note under our credit loan agreement. The Second Term Note allows us to borrow from time to time up to $15.0 million to purchase equipment. In July 2012, we borrowed $9,346,000 under the Second Term Note to purchase Geospace Technologies GSR recording equipment. The outstanding principal under the Second Term Note is

amortized over 36 months. The Second Term Note bears interest at an annual rate equal to either the 30-day LIBOR, plus two and one-quarter percent, or the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, as we direct monthly, subject to an interest rate floor of 3.75%, and otherwise has the same terms as our revolving line of credit. The Second Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in our accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral and matures with all outstanding balances due on May 2, 2015.

On December 4, 2013, we entered into the Third Term Note dated as of December 2, 2013 under our credit loan agreement. The Third Term Note allows us to borrow from time to time up to $10.0 million to purchase equipment. Per a subsequentthe agreement, we will be unable to receive an advance for the remainder of the $15.0 million balance of the Second Term Note. On December 5, 2013, we borrowed the full amount of $10.0 million$10,000,000 under the Third Term Note to purchase Geospace Technologies GSX recording equipment. The outstanding principal under the Third Term Note is amortized over a period of 36 months. The Third Term Note bears interest at an annual fixed rate equal to 3.16%, and otherwise has the same terms as the revolving line of credit. The Third Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in our accounts receivable, equipment and related collateral and matures with all outstanding balances due on December 2, 2016.

In February 2013, our subsidiary DSS entered into the DSS Term Note with Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Company. DSS obtained $983,000 in financing for the purchase of equipment. The DSS Term Note is repayable over a period of 36 months at $28,980 per month and bears interest at an implied annual fixed rate of 3.84%. The DSS Term Note is collateralized by a security interest in the DSS equipment and matures with all outstanding balances due on February 5, 2016.

During fiscal 2012, we began leasing vehicles from Enterprise Fleet Management under capital leases. These capital lease obligations are payable in 36 to 60 monthly installments and mature between December 2014January 2015 and November 2017. At MarchDecember 31, 2014, we had leased 101112 vehicles under these capital leases.

The following table summarizes payments due in specific periods related to our contractual obligations with initial terms exceeding one year as of MarchDecember 31, 2014.

In April 2012, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC covering the periodic offer and sale of up to $150.0 million in debt securities, preferred and common stock and warrants. The registration statement allows us to sell securities in one or more separate offerings with the size, price and terms to be determined at the time of sale. The terms of any securities offered would be described in a related prospectus to be filed separately with the SEC at the time of the offering. The filing of the shelf registration statement will enable us to act quickly if and when opportunities arise.

We believe that our capital resources and cash flow from operations are adequate to meet our current operational needs. We believe we will be able to finance our capital requirements through cash flow from operations, cash on hand, through borrowings under our revolving line of credit, additional equipment term loans and capital leases. However, our ability to satisfy our working capital requirements and fund future capital requirements will depend principally upon our future operating performance, which is subject to the risks inherent in our business, including the demand for our seismic services from clients.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of MarchDecember 31, 2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.2014.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

None.In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 that introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for

those goods or services. This ASU also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. We will have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to select a transition method and determine the impact it will have on our consolidated financial statements and the method of adoption.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern” (Subtopic 205-40). This ASU provides guidance on management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and in certain circumstances to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the new guidance and determining the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to certain market risks arising from the use of financial instruments in the ordinary course of business. These risks arise primarily as a result of potential changes to operating concentration andof credit risk and changes in interest rates. We have not entered into any hedge arrangements, commodity swap agreements, commodity futures, options or other derivative financial instruments. During 2012, we began to conduct business in Canada which may subjectsubjects our results of operations and cash flow to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

Concentration of Credit Risk.Risk. Our principal market risks include fluctuations in commodity prices, which affect demand for and pricing of our services, and the risk related to the concentration of our clients in the oil and natural gas industry. Since all of our clients are involved in the oil and natural gas industry, there may be a positive or negative effect on our exposure to credit risk because our clients may be similarly affected by changes in economic and industry conditions. As an example, changes to existing regulations or the adoption of new regulations may unfavorably impact us, our suppliers or our clients. In the normal course of business, we provide credit terms to our clients. Accordingly, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our clients and maintain allowances for possible losses. We believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts of $250,000 at MarchDecember 31, 2014 is adequate to cover exposures related to our trade account balances.

We generally provide services to certain key clients that account for a significant percentage of our accounts receivable at any given time. Our key clients vary over time. We extend credit to various companies in the oil and natural gas industry, including our key clients, for the acquisition of seismic data, which results in a concentration of credit risk. This concentration of credit risk may be affected by changes in the economic or other conditions of our key clients and may accordingly impact our overall credit risk. If any of these significant clients were to terminate their contracts or fail to contract for our services in the future because they are acquired, alter their exploration or development strategy, or for any other reason, our results of operations could be affected. Due toBecause of the nature of our contracts and clients’ projects, our largest clients can change from year to year, and the largest clients in any year may not be indicative of the largest clients in any subsequent year.

Interest Rate Risk.We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on the outstanding indebtedness under our credit loan agreement, which has variable interest rates. Amounts drawn under the revolving line of credit and equipment term loans bear interest at variable rates based on the lower of the Prime Rate, minus three-quarters percent, or the 30-day LIBOR, plus a margin of two and one-quarter percent, subject to an interest rate floor of 4% for the Term Note and the revolving line of credit and an interest rate floor of 3.75% for the Second Term Note. At MarchDecember 31, 2014, our interest rate was 4% for the Term Note and the revolving line of credit and 3.75% for the Second Term Note and 3.16% for the Third Term Note.

We have cash in the bank which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Historically, we have not experienced any losses in such accounts; however, volatility in financial markets may impact our credit risk on cash and short-term investments. At MarchDecember 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents totaled $26,326,000.$14,644,000.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our President Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of MarchDecember 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, with regard to the recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, for information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended MarchDecember 31, 2014 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

FromOn January 7, 2015, Andrew Speese, through his attorney, filed a purported shareholder class action and derivative action on behalf of himself and our other shareholders in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Midland/Odessa Division), against us, our current directors, TGC and Riptide Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of TGC (“Merger Sub”). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the members of our Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed strategic business combination with TGC, and that TGC’s registration statement dated November 6, 2014, as subsequently amended, and prospectus filed on December 31, 2014 contain material omissions and materially misleading statements. The complaint seeks to enjoin us, TGC and Merger Sub from taking any actions that would allow the consummation of the proposed strategic business combination contemplated by the Merger Agreement or, in the event that the proposed strategic business combination is consummated, seeks a judgment for damages.

In addition, on January 8, 2015, we received a letter dated January 7, 2015 from legal counsel for Andrew Speese with respect to the lawsuit described above demanding that our Board of Directors take legal action to remedy alleged breaches of fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed strategic business combination and to recover damages caused by such alleged breaches.

Our Board of Directors has formed a Special Litigation Committee to investigate and determine whether any of the derivative claims should be pursued. A motion to enjoin the special meeting has not been filed, and we have filed a motion to dismiss the class action claims.

In addition, from time to time, we are a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although we cannot predict the outcomes of any such legal proceedings, our management believes that the resolution of pending legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.liquidity.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013,2014, which could materially affect our financial condition or results of operations. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 20132014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Form 10-Q and is hereby incorporated by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

2021