Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQuarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2014 or

for the quarterly period ended August 1, 2015 or
¨Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from to

Commission File Numberfile number 1-32349

Signet Jewelers Limited

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda Not Applicable

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton HM11

Bermuda

(441) 296 5872

(Address and telephone number including area code of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerxAccelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨  Smaller reporting company¨

(Check one).

Large accelerated filer   x          Accelerated filer   ¨         Non-accelerated filer   ¨         Smaller reporting company   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   ¨     No   x


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date.

date

Common Stock, $0.18 par value, 80,215,00379,592,007 shares as of September 5, 2014

August 28, 2015



1


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PAGE
NUMBER
 

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  1PAGE 

Item 1

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

  1

Condensed Consolidated Income Statements

  1
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION 
ITEM 1. 

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Income Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

  2 
 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

  3 
 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  4 
 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’Shareholders' Equity

  5 
 

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

  6 

Item 2

 

Management’s

ITEM 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  39 

Item 3

ITEM 3.
 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

  58 

Item 4

ITEM 4.
 

Controls and Procedures

  58 

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

  59

Item 1

Legal Proceedings

  59
 

Item 1A

PART II
 

Risk Factors

OTHER INFORMATION
  59 

Item 2

ITEM 1.
 

Legal Proceedings

ITEM 1A.Risk Factors
ITEM 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity and Securities and Use of Proceeds

  62 

Item 6

ITEM 6.
 

Exhibits

  63
 


2

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

   13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended    
(in millions, except per share amounts)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  Notes 

Sales

  $1,225.9  $880.2  $2,282.0  $1,873.8   2  

Cost of sales

   (816.9  (570.5)  (1,465.8  (1,181.3) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Gross margin

   409.0   309.7   816.2   692.5  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (379.2  (250.5)  (689.7  (537.5) 

Other operating income, net

   53.7   46.3   107.7   93.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Operating income

   83.5   105.5   234.2   248.3   2  

Interest expense, net

   (13.7  (1.0)  (15.5  (1.9) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Income before income taxes

   69.8   104.5   218.7   246.4  

Income taxes

   (11.8  (37.1  (64.1  (87.2  4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net income

  $58.0  $67.4  $154.6  $159.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Earnings per share: basic

  $0.73  $0.84  $1.93  $1.98   5  

diluted

  $0.72  $0.84  $1.93  $1.97   5  

Weighted average common shares outstanding: basic

   79.9   80.3   79.9   80.6   5  

diluted

   80.2   80.7   80.2   81.0   5  

Dividends declared per share

  $0.18  $0.15  $0.36  $0.30   6  

 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended  
(in millions, except per share amounts)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 Notes
Sales$1,410.6
 $1,225.9
 $2,941.2
 $2,282.0
 4
Cost of sales(919.8) (816.9) (1,884.5) (1,465.8)  
Gross margin490.8
 409.0
 1,056.7
 816.2
  
Selling, general and administrative expenses(452.8) (379.2) (906.0) (689.7)  
Other operating income, net62.8
 53.7
 126.3
 107.7
  
Operating income100.8
 83.5
 277.0
 234.2
 4
Interest expense, net(11.1) (13.7) (22.1) (15.5)  
Income before income taxes89.7
 69.8
 254.9
 218.7
  
Income taxes(27.5) (11.8) (73.9) (64.1) 8
Net income$62.2
 $58.0
 $181.0
 $154.6
  
Earnings per share: basic$0.78
 $0.73
 $2.27
 $1.93
 5
                                diluted$0.78
 $0.72
 $2.26
 $1.93
 5
Weighted average common shares outstanding: basic79.7
 79.9
 79.8
 79.9
 5
            ��                                                               diluted79.9
 80.2
 80.0
 80.2
 5
Dividends declared per share$0.22
 $0.18
 $0.44
 $0.36
 6
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


3


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

                                                            
   13 weeks ended 
   August 2, 2014  August 3, 2013 
(in millions)  Pre-tax
amount
  Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
  After-tax
amount
  Pre-tax
amount
  Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
  After-tax
amount
 

Net income

    $58.0    $67.4 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  $(2.3 $—     (2.3 $(5.2) $—     (5.2)

Available-for-sale securities:

       

Unrealized loss

   (0.2  —     (0.2  —     —     —   

Cash flow hedges:

       

Unrealized (loss) gain

   (0.2  0.1   (0.1)  (8.6)  3.2   (5.4)

Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) to net income

   5.1   (1.7  3.4   —     (0.1)  (0.1)

Pension plan:

       

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss

   0.5   (0.1  0.4   0.5   (0.1)  0.4 

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of net prior service credits

   (0.5  0.1    (0.4  (0.3)  0.1   (0.2)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

  $2.4  $(1.6 $0.8  $(13.6) $3.1  $(10.5)
    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

    $58.8    $56.9 
    

 

 

    

 

 

 

                                                            
   26 weeks ended 
   August 2, 2014  August 3, 2013 
(in millions)  Pre-tax
amount
  Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
  After-tax
amount
  Pre-tax
amount
  Tax
(Expense)
Benefit
  After-tax
amount
 

Net income

    $154.6    $159.2  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  $7.3   $—     7.3   $(7.0) $—     (7.0)

Available-for-sale securities:

       

Unrealized loss

   (0.2  —     (0.2  —     —     —   

Cash flow hedges:

       

Unrealized gain (loss)

   0.5   (0.3  0.2   (26.1)  9.3   (16.8)

Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) to net income

   12.5   (4.4)  8.1   (1.0)  0.3   (0.7)

Pension plan:

       

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss

   1.0   (0.2)  0.8   1.1   (0.2)  0.9 

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of net prior service credits

   (0.9  0.2   (0.7)  (0.7)  0.1   (0.6)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

  $20.2  $(4.7) $15.5  $(33.7) $9.5  $(24.2)
    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

    $170.1    $135.0 
    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 13 weeks ended
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
(expense)
benefit
 After-tax
amount
 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
(expense)
benefit
 After-tax
amount
Net income    $62.2
     $58.0 
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Foreign currency translation adjustments$(4.7) $  (4.7) $(2.3) $
 (2.3)
Available-for-sale securities:           
Unrealized loss on securities, net(0.2)   (0.2) (0.2) 
 (0.2)
Cash flow hedges:           
Unrealized (loss) gain(8.1) 2.6  (5.5) (0.2) 0.1
 (0.1)
Reclassification adjustment of losses to net income1.1
 (0.3) 0.8
 5.1  (1.7) 3.4 
Pension plan:           
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss0.9
 (0.2) 0.7
 0.5  (0.1) 0.4 
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service (credits) costs(0.6) 0.1  (0.5) (0.5) 0.1
 (0.4)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)$(11.6) $2.2 
$(9.4) $2.4 
$(1.6) $0.8 
Total comprehensive income    $52.8
     $58.8 
 26 weeks ended
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
(expense)
benefit
 After-tax
amount
 Pre-tax
amount
 Tax
(expense)
benefit
 After-tax
amount
Net income    $181.0
     $154.6 
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Foreign currency translation adjustments$2.8
 $  2.8
 $7.3  $
 7.3 
Available-for-sale securities:           
Unrealized loss on securities, net(0.3)   (0.3) (0.2) 
 (0.2)
Cash flow hedges:           
Unrealized (loss) gain(17.2) 5.8  (11.4) 0.5  (0.3) 0.2 
Reclassification adjustment of losses to net income1.8
 (0.5) 1.3
 12.5  (4.4) 8.1 
Pension plan:           
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss1.7
 (0.3) 1.4
 1.0  (0.2) 0.8 
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits(1.1) 0.2  (0.9) (0.9) 0.2
 (0.7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)$(12.3) $5.2  $(7.1) $20.2  $(4.7) $15.5 
Total comprehensive income    $173.9
     $170.1 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


4


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(in millions, except per share data)  August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  Notes 

Assets

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $215.0  $247.6  $212.9  

Accounts receivable, net

   1,316.0   1,374.0   1,152.1   8  

Other receivables

   54.1   51.5   43.0  

Other current assets

   120.5   87.0   79.2   11  

Deferred tax assets

   2.3   3.0   2.3  

Income taxes

   15.5   6.5   12.8  

Inventories

   2,345.3   1,488.0   1,417.7   9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total current assets

   4,068.7   3,257.6   2,920.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Non-current assets:

     

Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $831.7, $788.1, and $750.1, respectively

   627.8   487.6   434.9  

Goodwill

   551.9    26.8    23.2    10  

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $2.4

   467.6   —     —     10  

Other assets

   133.0   87.2   84.2   11  

Deferred tax assets

   84.4   113.7   127.3  

Retirement benefit asset

   61.3   56.3   50.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total assets

  $5,994.7  $4,029.2  $3,640.3   2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity

     

Current liabilities:

     

Loans and overdrafts

  $31.2  $19.3  $1.7   19  

Accounts payable

   235.0   162.9   130.3  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   422.1   328.5   259.7   13  

Deferred revenue

   211.1   173.0   154.6   12  

Deferred tax liabilities

   218.9   113.1   140.8  

Income taxes

   55.4   103.9   46.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total current liabilities

   1,173.7   900.7   734.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Non-current liabilities:

     

Long-term debt

   1,379.1   —     —     19  

Other liabilities

   235.4   121.7   114.6  

Deferred revenue

   520.4   443.7   418.4   12  

Deferred tax liabilities

   2.2   —     0.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total liabilities

   3,310.8   1,466.1   1,267.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commitments and contingencies

      17  

Shareholders’ equity:

     

Common shares of $0.18 par value: authorized 500 shares, 80.2 shares outstanding (February 1, 2014: 80.2 shares outstanding; August 3, 2013: 80.5 shares outstanding)

   15.7   15.7   15.7  

Additional paid-in capital

   262.5   258.8   249.3  

Other reserves

   0.4   0.4   0.4   6  

Treasury shares at cost: 7.0 shares (February 1, 2014: 7.0 shares; August 3, 2013: 6.7 shares)

   (367.0  (346.2  (321.8  6  

Retained earnings

   2,935.3   2,812.9   2,628.9  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (163.0)  (178.5)  (199.9)  7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total shareholders’ equity

   2,683.9   2,563.1   2,372.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $5,994.7  $4,029.2  $3,640.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

(in millions, except par value per share amount)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014 Notes
Assets       
Current assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$159.8
 $193.6
 $215.0
  
Accounts receivable, net1,493.2
 1,567.6
 1,316.0
 9
Other receivables55.2
 63.6
 54.1
  
Other current assets126.8
 137.2
 120.5
  
Deferred tax assets4.3
 4.5
 2.3
  
Income taxes3.0
 1.8
 15.5
  
Inventories2,414.2
 2,439.0
 2,345.3
 10
Total current assets4,256.5
 4,407.3
 4,068.7
  
Non-current assets:       
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $915.1, $852.1 and $831.7, respectively685.1
 665.9
 627.8
  
Goodwill517.6
 519.2
 551.9
 11
Intangible assets, net437.8
 447.1
 467.6
 11
Other assets145.4
 140.0
 133.0
 12
Deferred tax assets129.0
 111.1
 84.4
  
Retirement benefit asset40.4
 37.0
 61.3
 16
Total assets$6,211.8
 $6,327.6
 $5,994.7
  
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity       
Current liabilities:       
Loans and overdrafts$82.0
 $97.5
 $31.2
 17
Accounts payable194.0
 277.7
 235.0
  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities453.1
 482.4
 422.1
  
Deferred revenue230.2
 248.0
 211.1
 18
Deferred tax liabilities172.4
 145.8
 218.9
  
Income taxes5.8
 86.9
 55.4
  
Total current liabilities1,137.5
 1,338.3
 1,173.7
  
Non-current liabilities:       
Long-term debt1,348.7
 1,363.8
 1,379.1
 17
Other liabilities226.2
 230.2
 235.4
  
Deferred revenue607.0
 563.9
 520.4
 18
Deferred tax liabilities20.2
 21.0
 2.2
  
Total liabilities3,339.6
 3,517.2
 3,310.8
  
Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 21
Shareholders’ equity:       
Common shares of $0.18 par value: authorized 500 shares, 79.7 shares outstanding (January 31, 2015: 80.3 outstanding; August 2, 2014: 80.2 outstanding)15.7
 15.7
 15.7
  
Additional paid-in capital269.7
 265.2
 262.5
  
Other reserves0.4
 0.4
 0.4
  
Treasury shares at cost: 7.5 shares (January 31, 2015: 6.9 shares; August 2, 2014: 7.0 shares)(452.7) (370.0) (367.0) 6
Retained earnings3,282.8
 3,135.7
 2,935.3
  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(243.7) (236.6) (163.0) 7
Total shareholders’ equity2,872.2
 2,810.4
 2,683.9
  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$6,211.8
 $6,327.6
 $5,994.7
  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


5


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

   13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Cash flows from operating activities

     

Net income

  $58.0   $67.4   $154.6   $ 159.2  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

     

Depreciation and amortization

   36.5   25.5   64.5   51.1 

Amortization of unfavorable leases and contracts

   (5.9)  —     (5.9)  —   

Pension benefit

   (0.6)  (0.1)  (1.2)  (0.2)

Share-based compensation

   4.0   3.5   7.2   6.5 

Deferred taxation

   (13.6)  (4.4)  (4.2)  (2.5)

Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards

   —     (4.5)  (7.7)  (4.5)

Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs

   4.5   0.1   5.5   0.2 

Other non-cash movements

   0.7   (0.7)  0.1   (0.9)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

     

(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable

   (7.9)  5.2   58.3   52.8 

Increase in other receivables and other assets

   (2.3)  (4.4)  (4.0)  (9.9)

(Increase) decrease in other current assets

   (23.2)  (0.5)  (22.7)  4.0 

Decrease (increase) in inventories

   37.0   (2.7)  17.1   (57.4)

Decrease in accounts payable

   (24.7)  (47.6)  (28.9)  (29.3)

Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities

   23.9   (5.8)  (19.0)  (57.1)

Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue

   6.1   (0.4)  21.0   7.6 

Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable

   19.5   (15.8)  (48.5)  (58.2)

Pension plan contributions

   (1.1)  (1.0)  (2.2)  (2.8)

Effect of exchange rate changes on currency swaps

   (0.5)  (0.4)  (0.1)  (0.1)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   110.4   13.4   183.9   58.5 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

     

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

   (61.9)  (30.4)  (90.0)  (53.6)

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

   (1.2)  —     (1.2)  —   

Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

   1.0   —     1.0   —   

Acquisition of Ultra Stores, Inc.

   —     1.4   —     1.4 

Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired

   (1,429.2)  —     (1,429.2)  —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (1,491.3)  (29.0)  (1,519.4)  (52.2)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

     

Dividends paid

   (14.4)  (12.1)  (26.4)  (21.9)

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

   1.0   0.2   2.0   5.2 

Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards

   —     4.5   7.7   4.5 

Proceeds from term loan

   400.0   —     400.0   —   

Proceeds from senior notes

   398.4   —     398.4   —   

Proceeds from securitization facility

   930.6    —     930.6    —   

Repayments of securitization facility

   (330.6  —     (330.6  —   

Payment of debt issuance costs

   (15.4  —     (18.4  —   

Repurchase of common shares

   (11.0)  (25.0)  (22.4)  (75.1)

Net settlement of equity based awards

   0.2   0.1   (15.1)  (9.0)

Principal payments under capital lease obligations

   (0.2  —     (0.2  —   

(Repayment of) proceeds from short-term borrowings

   (11.7)  (4.0)  (22.2)  1.7 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   1,346.9   (36.3)  1,303.4   (94.6)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   249.1   263.7   247.6   301.0 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (34.0)  (51.9)  (32.1)  (88.3)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (0.1)  1.1   (0.5)  0.2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $215.0  $212.9  $215.0  $212.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:       
Net income$62.2
 $58.0
 $181.0
 $154.6
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:       
Depreciation and amortization42.7
 36.5
 84.5
 64.5
Amortization of unfavorable leases and contracts(8.8) (5.9) (17.6) (5.9)
Pension benefit
 (0.6) 
 (1.2)
Share-based compensation3.8
 4.0
 7.1
 7.2
Deferred taxation7.0
 (13.6) 13.9
 (4.2)
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
 
 (5.1) (7.7)
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs0.7
 4.5
 1.6
 5.5
Other non-cash movements(0.2) 0.7
 2.0
 0.1
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:       
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable7.0
 (7.9) 74.7
 58.3
Increase in other receivables and other assets(6.3) (2.3) (0.5) (4.0)
Decrease (increase) in other current assets6.5
 (23.5) 4.8
 (22.8)
Decrease in inventories72.1
 37.0
 28.4
 17.1
Decrease in accounts payable(61.8) (24.7) (80.8) (28.9)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities42.5
 23.7
 (28.6) (19.0)
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue(3.7) 6.1
 24.0
 21.0
(Decrease) increase in income taxes payable(19.4) 19.5
 (77.3) (48.5)
Pension plan contributions(0.7) (1.1) (1.5) (2.2)
Net cash provided by operating activities143.6
 110.4
 210.6
 183.9
Investing activities       
Purchase of property, plant and equipment(56.0) (61.9) (98.9) (90.0)
Purchase of available-for-sale securities(0.5) (1.2) (1.9) (1.2)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities0.1
 1.0
 3.6
 1.0
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
 (1,429.2) 
 (1,429.2)
Net cash used in investing activities(56.4) (1,491.3) (97.2) (1,519.4)
Financing activities       
Dividends paid(17.7) (14.4) (32.1) (26.4)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares0.1
 1.0
 0.2
 2.0
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
 
 5.1
 7.7
Proceeds from senior notes
 398.4
 
 398.4
Proceeds from term loan
 400.0
 
 400.0
Repayments of term loan(5.0) 
 (10.0) 
Proceeds from securitization facility558.1
 930.6
 1,196.3
 930.6
Repayments of securitization facility(558.1) (330.6) (1,196.3) (330.6)
Payment of debt issuance costs
 (15.4) 
 (18.4)
Repurchase of common shares(62.8) (11.0) (81.9) (22.4)
Net settlement of equity based awards0.4
 0.2
 (8.3) (15.1)
Principal payments under capital lease obligations(0.3) (0.2) (0.6) (0.2)
Repayment of short-term borrowings35.0
 (11.7) (20.0) (22.2)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(50.3) 1,346.9
 (147.6) 1,303.4
        
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period122.6
 249.1
 193.6
 247.6
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents36.9
 (34.0) (34.2) (32.1)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents0.3
 (0.1) 0.4
 (0.5)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$159.8
 $215.0
 $159.8
 $215.0
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


6


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Common
shares at
par value
   Additional
paid-in
capital
  Other
reserves
   Treasury
shares
  Retained
earnings
  Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
  Total
shareholders’
equity
 

Balance at February 1, 2014

  $ 15.7    $ 258.8   $ 0.4    $ (346.2) $ 2,812.9   $(178.5) $2,563.1  

Net income

   —      —     —      —     154.6   —     154.6 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   —      —     —      —     —     15.5   15.5 

Dividends

   —      —     —      —     (28.8)  —     (28.8)

Repurchase of common shares

   —      —     —      (22.4)  —     —     (22.4)

Net settlement of equity based awards

   —      (3.4  —      (0.8)  (3.2)  —     (7.4)

Share options exercised

   —      (0.1)  —      2.4   (0.2)  —     2.1 

Share-based compensation expense

   —      7.2   —      —     —     —     7.2 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at August 2, 2014

  $15.7    $262.5  $0.4   $(367.0) $2,935.3  $(163.0) $2,683.9 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Common
shares at
par value
 Additional
paid-in
capital
 Other
reserves
 Treasury
shares
 Retained
earnings
 Accumulated
other
comprehensive
(loss) income
 Total
shareholders’
equity
Balance at January 31, 2015$15.7
 $265.2
 $0.4
 $(370.0) $3,135.7
 $(236.6) $2,810.4
Net income
 
 
 
 181.0
 
 181.0
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 (7.1) (7.1)
Dividends
 
 
 
 (35.2) 
 (35.2)
Repurchase of common shares
 
 
 (81.9) 
 
 (81.9)
Net settlement of equity based awards
 (2.6) 
 (1.1) 1.4
 
 (2.3)
Share options exercised
 
 
 0.3
 (0.1) 
 0.2
Share-based compensation expense
 7.1
 
 
 
 
 7.1
Balance at August 1, 2015$15.7
 $269.7
 $0.4
 $(452.7) $3,282.8
 $(243.7) $2,872.2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


7


SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. PrincipalOrganization and principal accounting policies and basis of preparation

Basis of preparation

Signet Jewelers Limited (“Signet”, or the “Company”) is, a holding company incorporated in Bermuda, thatis the world's largest retailer of diamond jewelry. The Company operates through its subsidiaries.100% owned subsidiaries with sales primarily in the US, UK and Canada. Signet is a leading retailer whose results are principally derived from one business segment – the retailing of jewelry, watches and associated services.

On May 29, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of Zale Corporation (“the Acquisition”) (see Note 20 for further information). Prior to the Acquisition, the Company managedmanages its business as two geographicalfive reportable segments, beingsegments: the United StatesSterling Jewelers division, the Zale division, which consists of America (the “US”)Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda, the UK Jewelry division and the United Kingdom (the “UK”) divisions. In connection with the Acquisition, the Company will no longer report its segments geographically, but by store brand grouping. Other reportable segment.

The former USSterling Jewelers division operates retail stores in all 50 US states in malls, outlets and off-mall locations under brands including Kay Jewelers, Kay Jewelers Outlet, Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry, Jared Vault and various mall-based regional brands. The Zale division primarily operates in shopping malls throughout the US, Canada and Puerto Rico. Zale Jewelry retail stores operate under brands including Zales Jewelers, Zales Outlet, Peoples Jewellers and various regional brands, and will be known as Sterling Jewelers division (“Sterling Jewelers”).while Piercing Pagoda operates through mall-based kiosks. The former UK division’sJewelry division's retail stores operate in major regional shopping malls and off-mall "high street" locations (main shopping thoroughfares with high pedestrian traffic) under brands including H.Samuel and Ernest Jones. In connection with the Acquisition, the former UK division will be known as UK Jewelry division (“UK Jewelry”).

In connection with the Acquisition, the Zale division (“Zale”) was added, consisting of two newThe Other reportable segments: Zale Jewelry (“Zale Jewelry”) and Piercing Pagoda (“Piercing Pagoda”). Zale Jewelry is comprised of three core national brands, Zales Jewelers, Zales Outlet and Peoples Jewellers and two regional brands, Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins Jewellers. Each brand specializes in fine jewelry and watches, with merchandise and marketing emphasis focused on diamond products. Zales Jewelers is the national brand in the US providing moderately priced jewelry to a broad range of customers. Zales Outlet operates in outlet malls and neighborhood power centers and capitalizes on Zales Jewelers’ national marketing and brand recognition. Gordon’s Jewelers is a value-oriented regional jeweler. Peoples Jewellers is Canada’s largest fine jewelry retailer. Mappins Jewellers offers customers classic fine jewelry also in Canada. Piercing Pagoda operates mall-based kiosks focused on the opening price point customer. Piercing Pagoda specializes in gold, silver and non-precious metal products that capitalize on the latest fashion trends.

In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014, subsequent to the November 4, 2013 acquisition of a diamond polishing factory in Gaborone, Botswana, management established a separate operating segment (“Other”), which consists of all non-reportable segments, including subsidiaries involved in the purchasing and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones.

stones and unallocated corporate administrative functions. See Note 4 for additional discussion of the Company’s segments.

Signet’s sales are seasonal, with the first quarter slightly exceeding 20% of annual sales, the second and third quarters each approximating 20% and the fourth quarter accounting for almost 40% of annual sales, with December being by far the most important month of the year. The “Holiday Season” consists of results for the months of November and December. As a result, approximately 45% to 55% of Signet’s annual operating income normally occurs in the fourth quarter, comprised of nearly all of the UK Jewelry and Zale divisions’ annual operating income and about 40% to 45% of the Sterling Jewelers division’s annual operating income.
Basis of preparation
These condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from this report, as is permitted by such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in Signet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2014.

year-ended January 31, 2015.

Use of estimates

The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements, in conformity with US GAAP and SEC regulations for interim reporting, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are primarily made in relation to the valuation of accounts receivables, inventory andinventories, deferred revenue, fair value of derivatives, depreciation and asset impairment, the valuation of employee benefits, income taxes, contingencies, and contingencies.

asset impairments, as well as estimates utilized for the depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets and the accounting for business combinations.

Fiscal year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31st. Fiscal 20152016 is the 52 week year ending January 31, 201530, 2016 and Fiscal 2014 is2015 was the 52 week year ended February 1, 2014.January 31, 2015. Within these condensed consolidated financial statements, the second quarter and year to date of the relevant fiscal years 20152016 and 20142015 refer to the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively.

8

Table of Contents

Foreign currency translation
The financial position and August 3, 2013, respectively.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Seasonality

Signet’s sales are seasonal, with the first quarter slightly exceeding 20%operating results of annual sales, the second and third quarters approximating 20% and the fourth quarter accounting for almost 40% of annual sales, with December being by far the most important month of the year. Sales made in November and December are known as the “Holiday Season.” Due to sales leverage, Signet’s operating income is even more seasonal; about 45% to 55% of Signet’s operating income normally occurs in the fourth quarter, comprised of nearly all ofcertain foreign operations, including the UK Jewelry division and Zale divisions’ operating income and about 40% to 45%the Canadian operations of the Sterling Jewelers division’s operating income.

Zale Jewelry segment, are consolidated using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated at the monthly average rates of exchange during the period. Resulting translation gains or losses are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included within the condensed consolidated income statements, whereas translation adjustments and gains or losses related to intercompany loans of a long-term investment nature are recognized as a component of AOCI.

Revenue recognition

Extended service plans and lifetime warranty agreements

Signet

The Company recognizes revenue related to lifetime warranty sales in proportion to when the expected costs will be incurred. The deferral period for lifetime warranty sales in each division is determined from patterns of claims costs, including estimates of future claims costs expected to be incurred. Management reviews the trends in claims to assess whether changes are required to the revenue and cost recognition rates utilized. A significant change in estimates related to the time period or pattern in which warranty-related costs are expected to be incurred could adverselymaterially impact revenues. All direct costs associated with the sale of these plans are deferred and amortized in proportion to the revenue recognized and disclosed as either other current assets or other assets.

The Sterling Jewelers division sells extended service plans, where it is obliged, subject to certain conditions, to perform repair work over the lifetimelife of the product. Revenue from the sale of these lifetime extended service plans is recognized consistent with the estimated pattern of claim costs expected to be incurred by the Company in connection with performing under the extended service plan obligations. Based on an evaluation of historical claims data, management currently estimates that substantially all claims will be incurred within 17 years of the sale of the warranty contract.
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, an operational change related to the Sterling Jewelers division's extended service plans associated with ring sizing was made to further align Zale and Sterling ESP policies. As a result, revenue from the sale of these lifetime extended service plans in the Sterling Jewelers division is deferred and recognized over 1417 years for all plans, with approximately 45%57% of revenue recognized within the first two years.

years for plans sold on or after May 2, 2015 and 42% of revenue recognized within the first two years for plans sold prior to May 2, 2015 (January 31, 2015: 45%; August 2, 2014: 45%).

The Zale division also sells extended service plans. Zale Jewelry customers are offered lifetime warranties on certain products that cover sizing and breakage with an option to purchase theft protection for a two-year period. Revenue from the sale of lifetime extended service plans is deferred and recognized over 10 years.years, with approximately 69% of revenue recognized within the first two years (January 31, 2015: 69%). Revenues related to the optional theft protection are deferred and recognized over the two-year contract period on a straight-line basis. Zale Jewelry customers are also offered a two-year watch warranty and a one-year warranty that covers breakage. Piercing Pagoda customers are also offered a one-year warranty that covers breakage. Revenue from the two-year watch warranty and one-year breakage warranty is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective contract terms.

Goodwill

Goodwill representsThe Sterling Jewelers division also sells a Jewelry Replacement Plan (“JRP”). The JRP is designed to protect customers from damage or defects of purchased merchandise for a period of three years. If the excess ofpurchased merchandise is defective or becomes damaged under normal use in that time period, the purchase price of acquisitionsitem will be replaced. JRP revenue is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the Company’s interestperiod of expected claims costs.

Signet also sells warranty agreements in the fair valuecapacity of an agent on behalf of a third-party. The commission that Signet receives from the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired. Goodwillthird-party is recorded byrecognized at the Company’s reporting unitstime of sale less an estimate of cancellations based on historical experience.
Reclassification
The Company has reclassified the acquisitions made by each. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment and is requiredpresentation of certain prior year amounts in the statement of cash flows to be tested at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value. The annual testing date for goodwill allocatedconform to the Sterling Jewelers reporting unit is the last daycurrent year presentation.


9

Table of the fourth quarter. The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the reporting units associated with the Acquisition and the Other reporting unit is May 31.

The Company may elect to perform a qualitative assessment for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value. If a qualitative assessment is not performed, or if as a result of a qualitative assessment it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then the reporting unit’s fair value is compared to its carrying value. Fair value is determined through the income approach using discounted cash flow models or market-based methodologies. Significant estimates used in these discounted cash flow models include: the weighted average cost of capital; long-term growth rates; expected changes to selling prices, direct costs and profitability of the business; and working capital requirements. Management estimates discount rates using post-tax rates that reflect assessments of the time value of money and Company-specific risks. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, the Company determines the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, the Company recognizes an impairment charge equal to the difference.

See Note 20 for additional discussion of the goodwill recorded by the Company during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015. There have been no goodwill impairment losses recorded during the fiscal periods presented in the condensed consolidated income statements. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required. See Note 10 for additional information.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Intangible assets

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset are less than the carrying amount, the Company recognizes an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment each year in the fourth quarter and may be reviewed more frequently if certain events occur or circumstances change. First, pursuant to Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment”, the Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company estimates the fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset, compares that value with its carrying amount and records an impairment charge, if any.

If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required. See Note 10 for additional information on intangible assets.

Capital leases

The Zale division has capital leases related to vehicles for field management. The vehicles are included in property, plant and equipment in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated over a four-year life.

Contents


2. New accounting pronouncements adopted during the period

Presentation of unrecognized tax benefit

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The new guidance requires, unless certain conditions exist, an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a reduction to a deferred tax asset in the financial statements for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. Signet adopted this guidance effective for the first quarter ended May 3, 2014 and the implementation of this accounting pronouncement did not have an impact on Signet’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

New accounting pronouncements to be adopted in future periods

Revenue recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The new guidance affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 provides alternative methods of retrospective adoption andadoption. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers-Deferral of the Effective Date.” The new guidance defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. As a result, ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years,annual periods, and interim periods within those years,annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early2017, with early adoption is not permitted.permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that annual period. Signet is currently assessing the impact, if any, as well as the available methods of implementation, that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have on its consolidatedthe Company's financial statements.

position or results of operations.

Share-based compensation

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” The new guidance requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. ASU No. 2014-12 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Signet does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Debt issuance costs
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The new guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability, similar to the presentation of debt discounts. ASU No. 2015-03 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Signet does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
Inventory
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” The new guidance states that inventory will be measured at the “lower of cost and net realizable value” and options that currently exist for “market value” will be eliminated. The ASU defines net realizable value as the “estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.” No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted and should be applied prospectively. Signet is currently assessing the impact, if any, that thethat adoption of this accounting pronouncementguidance will have on its consolidatedthe Company's financial statements.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Reclassification

Signet has reclassified the presentationposition or results of certain prior year information to conform to the current year presentation.

2. Segment information

operations.



10

Table of Contents

3. Acquisitions
Zale Corporation
On May 29, 2014, the Company completedacquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Zale Corporation, making the entity a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of Signet (the "Zale Acquisition" or "Acquisition"). Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, Zale Corporation shareholders received $21 per share in cash for each outstanding share of common stock and the vesting, upon consummation of the Acquisition, (seeof certain outstanding Zale Corporation restricted stock units and stock options, which converted into the right to receive the merger consideration of $1,458.0 million, including $478.2 million to extinguish Zale Corporation’s existing debt. The Acquisition was funded by the Company through existing cash and the issuance of $1,400.0 million of long-term debt, including: (a) $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes due in 2024, (b) $600.0 million of two-year revolving asset-backed variable funding notes, and (c) a $400.0 million five-year senior unsecured term loan facility. See Note 2017 for further information). Prioradditional information related to the Company’s long-term debt instruments.
The transaction was accounted for as a business combination during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015. The Acquisition aligns with the Company managedCompany’s strategy to diversify businesses and expand its business as two geographical reportable segments, beingfootprint. The following table summarizes the US and UK divisions. In connectionconsideration transferred in conjunction with the Acquisition as of May 29, 2014:
(in millions, except per share amounts)Amount
Cash consideration paid to Zale Corporation shareholders ($21 per share)$910.2
Cash consideration paid for settlement of Zale Corporation stock options, restricted share awards and long term incentive plan awards69.6
Cash paid to extinguish Zale Corporation outstanding debt as of May 29, 2014478.2
Total consideration transferred$1,458.0
Under the Company will no longer report its segments geographically, but by store brand grouping. The former US division operates retail stores under brands including Kay Jewelers, Jared The Galleria Of Jewelryacquisition method of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired and various regional brands and will be known as Sterling Jewelers division. The former UK division’s retail stores operate under brands including H.Samuel and Ernest Jones will be known as UK Jewelry division.

In connection with the Acquisition, the Zale division was added, consisting of two new reportable segments: Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda. Zale Jewelry is comprised of three core national brands, Zales Jewelers, Zales Outlet and Peoples Jewellers and two regional brands, Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins Jewellers. Each brand specializes in fine jewelry and watches, with merchandise and marketing emphasis focused on diamond products. Zales Jewelers is the national brand in the US providing moderately priced jewelry to a broad range of customers. Zales Outlet operates in outlet malls and neighborhood power centers and capitalizes on Zales Jewelers’ national marketing and brand recognition. Gordon’s Jewelers is a value-oriented regional jeweler. Peoples Jewellers is Canada’s largest fine jewelry retailer. Mappins Jewellers offers customers classic fine jewelry also in Canada. Piercing Pagoda operates mall-based kiosks focused on the opening price point customer. Piercing Pagoda specializes in gold, silver and non-precious metal products that capitalize on the latest fashion trends.

Inliabilities assumed are recorded at acquisition date fair values. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014, subsequent2015, the Company finalized the valuation of net assets acquired. The following table summarizes the fair values identified for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Acquisition as of May 29, 2014:

(in millions) Fair values 
     Cash and cash equivalents $28.8
 
     Inventories 856.7
 
     Other current assets 22.4
 
     Property, plant and equipment 103.6
 
     Intangible assets:   
          Trade names 417.0
 
          Favorable leases 50.2
 
Deferred tax assets 132.8
 
Other assets 25.4
 
Current liabilities(1)
 (206.3) 
Deferred revenue (93.3) 
Unfavorable leases (50.5) 
Unfavorable contracts (65.6) 
Deferred tax liabilities (234.0) 
Other liabilities (28.6) 
Fair value of net assets acquired 958.6
 
Goodwill 499.4
 
Total consideration transferred $1,458.0
 
(1) Includes loans and overdrafts, accounts payable, income taxes payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

11

Table of Contents

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recognized as goodwill. The goodwill attributable to the November 4, 2013Acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. See Note 11.
The following unaudited consolidated pro forma information summarizes the results of operations of the Company as if the Acquisition and related issuance of $1,400.0 million of long-term debt (see Note 17) had occurred as of February 2, 2013. The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information was prepared in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting under existing standards and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred if the Acquisition had been completed on the date indicated, nor is it indicative of the future operating results of the Company.
  13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions, except per share amounts) August 2, 2014 August 2, 2014
Pro forma sales $1,378.8
 $2,858.2
Pro forma net income $83.7
 $198.7
Pro forma earnings per share – basic $1.05
 $2.49
Pro forma earnings per share – diluted $1.04
 $2.48
The unaudited pro forma information gives effect to actual operating results prior to the Acquisition and has been adjusted with respect to certain aspects of the Acquisition to reflect the following:
Acquisition accounting adjustments to reset deferred revenue associated with extended service plans sold by Zale Corporation prior to the Acquisition to fair value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the estimated costs remaining to be incurred for future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition, plus a diamond polishing factoryreasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. These adjustments also reflect the impact of deferring the revenue associated with the lifetime extended service plans over a 10-year period as disclosed in Gaborone, Botswana,Note 1.
Additional depreciation and amortization expenses that would have been recognized assuming fair value adjustments to the existing Zale Corporation assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including intangible assets, favorable and unfavorable leases, and unfavorable contracts and expense associated with the fair value step-up of inventory acquired.
Tax impact of the Company’s amended capital structure as a result of the Acquisition and related issuance of $1,400 million of long-term debt.
Adjustment of valuation allowances associated with US and Canadian deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards.
Exclusion of acquisition-related costs of $30.8 million and $39.2 million, which were included in the Company’s net income during the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively. Also excluded were costs associated with the unsecured bridge facility discussed in Note 17 of $3.2 million and $4.0 million, which were included in the Company's net income during the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively. All amounts were reported within the Other segment.
The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect future events that either have occurred or may occur after the Acquisition, including, but not limited to, the anticipated realization of expected operating synergies in subsequent periods. They also do not give effect to acquisition-related costs that the Company expects to incur in connection with the Acquisition, including, but not limited to, additional professional fees, employee integration, retention, and severance costs.
4. Segment information
Financial information for each of Signet’s reportable segments is presented in the tables below. Signet's chief operating decision maker utilizes sales and operating income, after the elimination of any inter-segment transactions, to determine resource allocations and performance assessment measures. Signet’s sales are derived from the retailing of jewelry, watches, other products and services as generated through the management establishedof its five reportable segments: the Sterling Jewelers division, the Zale division, which consists of Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda, the UK Jewelry division and a separate operatingreportable segment, "Other". Other which consists of all non-reportable segments, including subsidiaries involved in the purchasing and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones. This segment was determined to be non-reportablestones and will be aggregated withunallocated corporate administrative functions that are below the quantifiable threshold for segment reporting. Prior year results have been revised to reflect this change. All inter-segment sales and transfers are eliminated.

    13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Sales:

     

Sterling Jewelers

  $810.4   $741.1   $1,713.9   $1,598.3  

UK Jewelry

   162.9    139.1    314.6    274.1  

Zale Jewelry

   215.0    —     215.0    —   

Piercing Pagoda

   32.5    —     32.5    —   

Other

   5.1    —     6.0    1.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales

  $1,225.9   $880.2   $2,282.0   $1,873.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

     

Sterling Jewelers

  $129.9   $111.9   $296.2   $264.7  

UK Jewelry

   1.1    (0.8)  1.1    (4.9)

Zale Jewelry

   (8.0)  —     (8.0)  —   

Piercing Pagoda

   (1.8)  —     (1.8)  —   

Other

   (37.7)(1)   (5.6)  (53.3)(1)   (11.5)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income

  $83.5   $105.5   $234.2   $248.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

separate disclosure as a reportable segment. See Note 1 for additional information.

12

Table of Contents

 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Sales:       
Sterling Jewelers$858.5
 $810.4
 $1,802.7
 $1,713.9
Zale Jewelry336.4
 215.0
 709.3
 215.0
Piercing Pagoda52.9
 32.5
 117.1
 32.5
UK Jewelry159.1
 162.9
 305.6
 314.6
Other3.7
 5.1
 6.5
 6.0
Total sales$1,410.6
 $1,225.9
 $2,941.2
 $2,282.0
        
Operating income (loss):       
Sterling Jewelers$157.8
 $129.9
 $336.0
 $296.2
Zale Jewelry(1)
(2.0) (8.0) 8.4
 (8.0)
Piercing Pagoda(2)
(0.1) (1.8) 5.0
 (1.8)
UK Jewelry3.2
 1.1
 3.7
 1.1
Other(3)
(58.1) (37.7) (76.1) (53.3)
Total operating income$100.8
 $83.5
 $277.0
 $234.2
(1)
Includes $30.8net operating loss of $4.4 million and $39.2$13.5 million related to the effects of purchase accounting associated with the acquisition related costsof Zale Corporation for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and $9.4 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively. See Note 203 for additional information.

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Total assets:

      

Sterling Jewelers

  $3,296.4    $3,311.0    $3,000.7  

UK Jewelry

   475.4     484.6     434.0  

Zale Jewelry

   1,881.6     —      —   

Piercing Pagoda

   123.9     —      —   

Other

   217.4     233.6     205.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $5,994.7     $4,029.2    $3,640.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Foreign currency translation

Assets and liabilities denominated in the British pound and the Canadian dollar are translated into the US dollar at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Equity accounts denominated in the British pound and Canadian dollar are translated into US dollars at historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses denominated in the British pound and Canadian dollar are translated into the US dollar at the monthly average exchange rate for the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included within the condensed consolidated income statement, whereas translation adjustments and gains and losses related to intercompany loans of a long-term investment nature are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). In addition, as the majority of the sales and expenses related to the factory in Gaborone, Botswana are transacted in US dollars, there is no related foreign currency translation as the US dollar is the functional currency.

4. Income taxes

Signet has business activity in all states within the US and files income tax returns for the US federal jurisdiction and all applicable states. Signet also files income tax returns in the UK, Canada and certain other foreign jurisdictions. Signet is subject to examination by the US federal and state and Canada tax authorities for tax years ending after November 1, 2008 and is subject to examination by the UK tax authority for tax years ending after January 31, 2012.

As of August 2, 2014, Signet had $6.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions, all of which would favorably affect the effective income tax rate if resolved in Signet’s favor. The unrecognized tax benefits increased by $1.7 million during the quarter related to positions taken by Zale Corporation prior to the Acquisition. The unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to financing arrangements and intra-group charges which are subject to different and changing interpretations of tax law.

Signet recognizes accrued interest and, where appropriate, penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. As of August 2, 2014, Signet had accrued interest of $1.1 million. The accrued interest increased by $0.8 million during the quarter related to tax positions taken by Zale Corporation prior to the Acquisition. Signet also had $0.6 million of accrued penalties as of August 2, 2014. All of the accrued penalties were recorded during the three months ended August 2, 2014 related as well to the Acquisition.

Over the next twelve months, management believes that it is reasonably possible that there could be a reduction of substantially all of the unrecognized tax benefits as of August 2, 2014, due to settlement of the uncertain tax positions with the tax authorities.

(2)
Includes net operating loss of $0.7 million and $3.0 million related to the effects of purchase accounting associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for the 13 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and $2.1 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively. See Note 3 for additional information.
(3)
Includes $43.6 million and $50.0 million of transaction-related and integration expenses, including the impact of the appraisal rights legal settlement discussed in Note 19, for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and $30.8 million and $39.2 million of transaction-related and integration expenses for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively. Transaction costs include expenses associated with advisor fees for legal, tax, accounting and consulting services.

(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Total assets:     
Sterling Jewelers$3,607.9
 $3,647.3
 $3,296.4
Zale Jewelry1,831.9
 1,903.6
 1,881.6
Piercing Pagoda116.9
 132.8
 123.9
UK Jewelry432.2
 413.5
 475.4
Other222.9
 230.4
 217.4
Total assets$6,211.8
 $6,327.6
 $5,994.7

5. Earnings per share

   13 weeks ended   26 weeks ended 
(in millions, except per share amounts)  August 2,
2014
   August 3,
2013
   August 2,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Net income

  $58.0    $67.4    $154.6    $159.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding

   79.9     80.3     79.9     80.6  

Dilutive effect of share awards

   0.3     0.4     0.3     0.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding

   80.2     80.7     80.2     81.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic

  $0.73    $0.84    $1.93    $1.98  

Earnings per share – diluted

  $0.72    $0.84    $1.93    $1.97  

 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions, except per share amounts)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Net income$62.2
 $58.0
 $181.0
 $154.6
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding79.7
 79.9
 79.8
 79.9
Dilutive effect of share awards0.2
 0.3
 0.2
 0.3
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding79.9
 80.2
 80.0
 80.2
Earnings per share – basic$0.78
 $0.73
 $2.27
 $1.93
Earnings per share – diluted$0.78
 $0.72
 $2.26
 $1.93

13

Table of Contents

The basic weighted average number of shares outstanding excludes non-vested time-based restricted shares, shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Trust and treasury shares. Such shares are not considered outstanding and do not qualify for dividends, except for time-based restricted shares for which dividends are earned and payable by the Company subject to full vesting. The effect of excluding these shares is to reduce the average number of shares in the 13 and 26 week periodsweeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015 by 7,299,7057,447,046 and 7,286,1607,327,100 shares, respectively (13 and 26 week periodsweeks ended August 3, 2013: 6,848,4282, 2014: 7,299,705 and 6,606,8827,286,160 shares, respectively). The calculation of fully diluted earnings per shareEPS for the 13 and 26 week periodsweeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015 excludes 5,128 and 2,564 non-vested time-based restrictedshare awards of 72,406 shares (13 and 26 week periodsweeks ended August 3, 2013: 1,0712, 2014: 5,128 and 53,421 shares,2,564 share awards, respectively) on the basis that their effect on earnings per share waswould be anti-dilutive.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

6. Shareholders’Shareholders' equity

Share repurchase

       26 weeks ended August 2, 2014   26 weeks ended August 3, 2013 
   

Amount

authorized

   Shares
repurchased
   Amount
repurchased
  Average
repurchase
price per
share
   Shares
repurchased
   Amount
repurchased
   Average
repurchase
price per
share
 
   (in millions)       (in millions)          (in millions)     

2013 Program(1)

  $350     220,132    $22.4    $101.57     374,613    $25.0    $66.74  

2011 Program(2)

  $350     n/a     n/a    n/a     749,245     50.1     66.92  
    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

     220,132    $22.4      1,123,858    $75.1    
    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

   26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014
 Amount
authorized
 Shares
repurchased
 Amount
repurchased
 Average
repurchase
price per
share
 Shares
repurchased
 Amount
repurchased
 Average
repurchase
price per
share
 (in millions)   (in millions)     (in millions)  
2013 Program(1)
$350.0
 628,955
 $81.9
 $130.27
 220,132
 $22.4
 $101.57
(1)In
(1)
On June 14, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $350 million of Signet’s common shares (the “2013 Program”). The 2013 Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice. The 2013 Program had $273.0$183.7 million remaining as of August 2, 2014.1, 2015.
Dividends
 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 
(in millions, except per share amounts)Cash dividend
per share
 Total
dividends
 Cash dividend
per share
 Total
dividends
 
First quarter(1)
$0.22
 $17.6
(2) 
$0.18
 $14.4
 
Second quarter$0.22
 $17.6
(3) 
$0.18
 $14.4
(3) 
(2)In October 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of Signet’s common shares (the “2011 Program”), which authorization was subsequently increased to $350 million. The 2011 Program was completed as of May 4, 2013.
n/aNot applicable.

Dividends

   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 
   Cash dividend
per share
   Total
dividends
  Cash dividend
per share
   Total
dividends
 
       (in millions)      (in millions) 

First quarter(1)

  $0.18    $14.4(2)   $0.15    $12.1  

Second quarter

  $0.18    $14.4(3)  $0.15    $12.1  

(1)
Signet’s dividend policy results in the dividend payment date being a quarter in arrears from the declaration date. As a result, the dividend declared in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014 $0.152015 of $0.18 per share cash dividend was paid on February 27, 201426, 2015 in the aggregate amount of $12.0$14.4 million.
(2)
(2)
The first quarter Fiscal 2015 $0.182016 $0.22 per share cash dividend was paid on May 28, 201427, 2015 in the aggregate amount of $14.4 million.$17.6 million.
(3)
As of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, $17.6 million and $14.4 million, respectively, has been recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets reflecting the cash dividenddividends declared for the second quarter of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, which has a record date of August 1, 2014 and a payment date of August 27, 2014.respectively.

Reclassification

During the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, $234.8 million was reclassified from other reserves within Shareholders’ Equity to retained earnings as the restrictions related to this amount were released. The presentation in previous periods has been adjusted to conform to the current period presentation.


7. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) income
The following tables present the changes in AOCI by component and the reclassifications out of AOCI, net of tax:
       Pension plan  
(in millions)Foreign
currency
translation
 Losses on available-for-sale securities, net Gains (losses)
on cash flow
hedges
 Actuarial
gains
(losses)
 Prior
service
credit
(cost)
 Accumulated
other
comprehensive
(loss) income
Balance at January 31, 2015$(197.6) $
 $4.4
 $(56.7) $13.3
 $(236.6)
Other comprehensive income ("OCI") before reclassifications2.8
 (0.3) (11.4) 
 
 (8.9)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to earnings
 
 1.3
 1.4
 (0.9) 1.8
Net current-period OCI2.8
 (0.3) (10.1) 1.4
 (0.9) (7.1)
Balance at August 1, 2015$(194.8) $(0.3) $(5.7) $(55.3) $12.4
 $(243.7)

14


The amounts reclassified from AOCI, by individual component, were as follows:

            Pension plan    
(in millions)  Foreign
currency
translation
  Losses on
available-for-
sale
securities, net
  Gains
(losses) on
cash flow
hedges
  Actuarial
(losses)
gains
  Prior
service
credit
(cost)
  Accumulated
other
comprehensive
(loss) income
 

Balance at February 1, 2014

  $(137.0 $—    $(14.3 $(42.5 $15.3   $(178.5

OCI before reclassifications

   7.3    (0.2)  0.2   —     —      7.3  

Amounts reclassified from accumulated OCI

   —     —     8.1   0.8   (0.7  8.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net current-period OCI

   7.3    (0.2  8.3   0.8   (0.7  15.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at August 2, 2014

  $(129.7 $(0.2 $(6.0 $(41.7 $14.6   $(163.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Reclassification activity by individual accumulated OCI component:  Amounts
reclassified from
accumulated OCI
  Amounts
reclassified from
accumulated OCI
  

Income statement caption

   13 weeks ended
August 2, 2014
  26 weeks ended
August 2, 2014
   
(in millions)         

(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges:

    

Foreign currency contracts

  $0.3  $0.3  Cost of sales (see Note 15)

Commodity contracts

   4.8   12.2  Cost of sales (see Note 15)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total before income tax

   5.1   12.5  
   (1.7)  (4.4) Income taxes
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net of tax

   3.4   8.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Defined benefit pension plan items:

    

Amortization of unrecognized net prior service credits

   (0.5  (0.9) Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss

   0.5   1.0  Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total before income tax

   —     0.1  
   —     —    Income taxes
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net of tax

   —     0.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total reclassifications

  $3.4  $8.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

  Amounts reclassified from AOCI  
  13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended  
(in millions) August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 Income statement caption
Losses on cash flow hedges:          
Foreign currency contracts $
 $0.3
 $0.1
 $0.3
 Cost of sales (see Note 14)
Interest rate swaps 0.8
 
 1.1
 
 Interest expense, net (see Note 14)
Commodity contracts 0.3
 4.8
 0.6
 12.2
 Cost of sales (see Note 14)
Total before income tax 1.1
 5.1
 1.8
 12.5
  
Income taxes (0.3) (1.7) (0.5) (4.4)  
Net of tax 0.8
 3.4
 1.3
 8.1
  
           
Defined benefit pension plan items:          
Amortization of unrecognized net prior service credit (0.6) (0.5) (1.1) (0.9) 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss 0.9
 0.5
 1.7
 1.0
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)
Total before income tax 0.3
 
 0.6
 0.1
  
Income taxes (0.1) 
 (0.1) 
  
Net of tax 0.2
 
 0.5
 0.1
  
           
Total reclassifications, net of tax $1.0
 $3.4
 $1.8
 $8.2
  
(1)
These items are included in the computation of net periodic pension benefit (cost). See Note 16 for additional information.

Reclassification activity by individual accumulated OCI component:  Amounts
reclassified from
accumulated OCI
  Amounts
reclassified from
accumulated OCI
  

Income statement caption

   13 weeks ended
August 3, 2013
  26 weeks ended
August 3, 2013
   
(in millions)         

(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges:

    

Foreign currency contracts

  $(0.2 $(0.4 Cost of sales (see Note 15)

Commodity contracts

   0.2   (0.6) Cost of sales (see Note 15)

Total before income tax

   —     (1.0) 
   (0.1)  0.3  Income taxes
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net of tax

   (0.1)  (0.7) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Defined benefit pension plan items:

    

Amortization of unrecognized net prior service credits

   (0.3)  (0.7) Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss

   0.5   1.1  Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total before income tax

   0.2   0.4  
   —     (0.1) Income taxes
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net of tax

   0.2   0.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total reclassifications

  $0.1  $(0.4) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

(1)These items are included in the computation of net periodic pension benefit (cost). See Note 16 for additional information.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

8. Income taxes
Signet has business activity in all states within the US and files income tax returns for the US federal jurisdiction and all applicable states. Signet also files income tax returns in the UK, Canada and certain other foreign jurisdictions. The provision for income taxes is based on the current estimate of the consolidated annual effective tax rate.  As of August 1, 2015, the Company expects its annual effective tax rate to be approximately 29.0% compared to 29.3% as of August 2, 2014.  The estimated effective tax rates exclude the effects of any discrete items that may be recognized in future periods.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, there has been no material change in the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, or the related accrued interest and penalties (where appropriate), in respect of uncertain tax positions identified as of January 31, 2015.
9. Accounts receivable, net

Signet’s accounts receivable primarily consist of Sterling Jewelers’ customer in-house financing receivables. The accounts receivable portfolio consists of a population that is ofhas similar characteristics and is evaluated collectively for impairment. The allowance is an estimate of the expected losses as of the balance sheet date, and is calculated using a proprietary model that analyzes factors such as delinquency rates and recovery rates. A 100% allowance is made for any amount that is more than 90 days aged on a recency basis and any amount associated with an account the owner of which has filed for bankruptcy, as well as an allowance for those amounts 90 days aged and under based on historical loss information and payment performance. The calculation is reviewed by management to assess whether, based on economic events, additional analyses are required to appropriately estimate losses inherent in the portfolio.

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Accounts receivable by portfolio segment, net:

      

Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables

  $1,305.1    $1,356.0    $1,142.0  

Other accounts receivable

   10.9     18.0     10.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accounts receivable, net

  $1,316.0    $1,374.0    $1,152.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers

(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Accounts receivable by portfolio segment, net:     
Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables$1,483.1
 $1,552.9
 $1,305.1
Other accounts receivable10.1
 14.7
 10.9
Total accounts receivable, net$1,493.2
 $1,567.6
 $1,316.0

15


Signet grants credit to customers based on a variety of credit quality indicators, including customerconsumer financial information and prior payment experience. On an ongoing basis, management monitors the credit exposure based on past due status and collection experience, as it has found a meaningful correlation between the past due status of customers and the risk of loss.

Other accounts receivable is comprised primarily of gross accounts receivable relating to the insurance loss replacement business in the UK Jewelry division of $7.9 million (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014: $13.7 million and $10.0 million, (February 1, 2014 and August 3, 2013: $12.8 million and $9.1 million, respectively), with a corresponding valuation allowance of $0.5 million (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014: $0.5 million and $0.6 million, (Februaryrespectively). The credit function for the Zale division is outsourced and, as such, no material accounts receivable exist as of August 1, 2014 and2015, January 31, 2015 or August 3, 2013: $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively).

Allowance2, 2014.

The allowance for credit losses on Sterling Jewelers’Jewelers' customer in-house finance receivables:

(in millions)  26 weeks
ended
August 2,
2014
  52 weeks
ended
February 1,
2014
  26 weeks
ended
August 3,
2013
 

Beginning balance

  $(97.8) $(87.7) $(87.7)

Charge-offs

   63.0   128.2   56.4 

Recoveries

   15.0   26.0   13.6 

Provision expense

   (79.1  (164.3)  (71.4)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Ending balance

  $(98.9) $(97.8) $(89.1)

Ending receivable balance evaluated for impairment

   1,404.0   1,453.8   1,231.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers’ customer in-house finance receivables, net

  $1,305.1  $1,356.0  $1,142.0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

receivables is shown below:

 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Beginning balance:$(113.1) $(97.8)
Charge-offs74.6
 63.0
Recoveries18.4
 15.0
Provision(95.9) (79.1)
Ending balance$(116.0) $(98.9)
Ending receivable balance evaluated for impairment1,599.1
 1,404.0
Sterling Jewelers customer in-house finance receivables, net$1,483.1
 $1,305.1
Net bad debt expense is calculateddefined as the provision expense less recoveries.

CreditThe following tables summarize the credit quality indicator and age analysis of past due Sterling Jewelers’Jewelers' customer in-house finance receivables:

                                                                                                                        
   August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 
(in millions)  Gross   Valuation
allowance
  Gross   Valuation
allowance
  Gross   Valuation
allowance
 

Performing:

          

Current, aged 0-30 days

  $1,110.6    $(34.0 $1,170.4   $(36.3 $973.2    $(29.9)

Past due, aged 31-90 days

   236.8     (8.3  229.9    (8.0  206.1     (7.4)

Non Performing:

          

Past due, aged more than 90 days

   56.6     (56.6)  53.5    (53.5)  51.8     (51.8)
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,404.0    $(98.9 $1,453.8   $(97.8 $1,231.1    $(89.1)
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

                                                                                                                        
   August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 
(as a percentage of the ending receivable balance)  Gross  Valuation
allowance
  Gross  Valuation
allowance
  Gross  Valuation
allowance
 

Performing

   96.0%  3.1%  96.3%  3.2%  95.8%  3.0%

Non Performing

   4.0%  100.0%  3.7%  100.0%  4.2%  100.0%
   100.0%  7.0%  100.0%  6.7%  100.0%  7.2%
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   
August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Gross Valuation
allowance
 Gross Valuation
allowance
 Gross Valuation
allowance
Performing:           
Current, aged 0 – 30 days$1,252.4
 $(38.1) $1,332.2
 $(41.1) $1,110.6
 $(34.0)
Past due, aged 31 – 90 days278.4
 (9.6) 271.1
 (9.3) 236.8
 (8.3)
Non Performing:           
Past due, aged more than 90 days68.3
 (68.3) 62.7
 (62.7) 56.6
 (56.6)
 $1,599.1
 $(116.0) $1,666.0
 $(113.1) $1,404.0
 $(98.9)
 August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
(as a % of the ending receivable balance)Gross Valuation
allowance
 Gross Valuation
allowance
 Gross Valuation
allowance
Performing95.7% 3.1% 96.2% 3.1% 96.0% 3.1%
Non Performing4.3% 100.0% 3.8% 100.0% 4.0% 100.0%
 100.0% 7.3% 100.0% 6.8% 100.0% 7.0%
Securitized credit card receivables

The Sterling Jewelers division securitizes its credit card receivables through its Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust established on May 15, 2014. See Note 1917 for additional information onregarding this asset-backed securitization facility.

9.


16


10. Inventories

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Raw materials

  $55.5    $41.8    $50.7  

Finished goods

   2,289.8     1,446.2     1,367.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total inventories

  $2,345.3    $1,488.0    $1,417.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

10.

The following table summarizes the details of the Company's inventory:
(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Raw materials$114.2
 $75.2
 $55.5
Finished goods2,300.0
 2,363.8
 2,289.8
Total inventories$2,414.2
 $2,439.0
 $2,345.3
11. Goodwill and intangibles

Goodwill
The following table summarizes the Company’s goodwill by reporting unit:

(in millions)  Sterling
Jewelers
  UK
Jewelry
   Zale
Jewelry
   Piercing
Pagoda
   Other   Total 

Balance at February 2, 2013

  $24.6   $—     $—     $—     $—     $24.6  

Acquisitions(1)

   (1.4)  —      —      —      3.6     2.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at February 1, 2014

   23.2    —      —      —      3.6     26.8  

Acquisitions(1)

   —     —      525.1     —      —      525.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at August 2, 2014

  $23.2   $—     $525.1    $—     $3.6    $551.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)See Note 20 for additional discussion of the goodwill recorded by the Company during Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015.

The Company’s reporting units align with the operating segments disclosed in Note 2. reportable segment:

(in millions)Sterling
Jewelers
 Zale
Jewelry
 Piercing
Pagoda
 UK Jewelry Other Total
Balance at February 1, 2014$23.2
 $
 $
 $
 $3.6
 $26.8
Acquisitions
 499.4
 
 
 
 499.4
Impact of foreign exchange
 (7.0) 
 
 
 (7.0)
Balance at January 31, 201523.2
 492.4
 
 
 3.6
 519.2
Impact of foreign exchange
 (1.6) 
 
 
 (1.6)
Balance at August 1, 2015$23.2
 $490.8
 $
 $
 $3.6
 $517.6
There have been no goodwill impairment losses recordedrecognized during the fiscal periods presented in the condensed consolidated income statements. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required.

Intangible Assets

Intangibles
Intangible assets with indefinite and definite lives represent the Zale trade names and favorable leases which are includedacquired, while intangible liabilities with definite lives represent unfavorable leases and contract rights acquired in the Zale Acquisition. No other intangible assets netor liabilities were recognized prior to the acquisition of Zale Corporation on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.May 29, 2014. The following table provides additional detail regarding the composition of intangible assets and liabilities as of August 2, 2014, February 1, 20142015, January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013.

  August 2, 2014  February 1, 2014  August 3, 2013 
  Gross
carrying
amount
  Accumulated
amortization
  Net
carrying
amount
  Gross
carrying
amount
  Accumulated
amortization
  Net
carrying
amount
  Gross
carrying
amount
  Accumulated
amortization
  Net
carrying
amount
 
(in millions)                           

Definite-lived intangible assets

         

Trade names

 $1.6   $—    $1.6   $—     $—     $—     $—     $—     $—    

Favorable leases

  50.2    (2.4  47.8    —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total definite-lived intangible assets

  51.8    (2.4  49.4    —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Indefinite-lived trade names

  418.2    —     418.2    —     —     —     —     —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangible assets, net

 $470.0   $(2.4 $467.6   $—     $—     $—     $—    $—     $—    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

11.2, 2014:

   August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Balance sheet location Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
 Gross
carrying
amount
 Accumulated
amortization
 Net
carrying
amount
Definite-lived intangible assets:                   
Trade namesIntangible assets, net $1.5
 $(0.3) $1.2
 $1.5
 $(0.2) $1.3
 $1.6
 $
 $1.6
Favorable leasesIntangible assets, net 47.6
 (15.8) 31.8
 48.1
 (9.1) 39.0
 50.2
 (2.4) 47.8
Total definite-lived intangible assets  49.1
 (16.1) 33.0
 49.6
 (9.3) 40.3
 51.8
 (2.4) 49.4
Indefinite-lived trade namesIntangible assets, net 404.8
 
 404.8
 406.8
 
 406.8
 418.2
 
 418.2
Total intangible assets, net  $453.9
 $(16.1) $437.8
 $456.4
 $(9.3) $447.1
 $470.0
 $(2.4) $467.6
Definite-lived intangible liabilities:                   
Unfavorable leasesOther liabilities $(48.3) $16.8
 $(31.5) $(48.7) $9.7
 $(39.0) $(50.5) $2.4
 $(48.1)
Unfavorable contractsOther liabilities (65.6) 24.2
 (41.4) (65.6) 13.8
 (51.8) (65.6) 3.5
 (62.1)
Total intangible liabilities, net  $(113.9) $41.0
 $(72.9) $(114.3) $23.5
 $(90.8) $(116.1) $5.9
 $(110.2)

17


12. Other assets

The following table summarizes the Company’s non-current other assets:

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Deferred extended service plan costs

  $64.5    $61.9    $58.8  

Investments(1)

   22.3     —      —   

Other assets

   46.2     25.3     25.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other assets

  $133.0    $87.2    $84.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)See Note 14 for additional discussion of the investment balances.

(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Deferred extended service plan costs$75.2
 $69.7
 $64.5
Investments23.2
 25.2
 22.3
Other assets47.0
 45.1
 46.2
Total other assets$145.4
 $140.0
 $133.0
In addition, other current assets include deferred direct costs in relation to the sale of extended service plans (“ESP”) of $22.9$23.9 million as of August 2, 2014 (February 1, 20142015 (January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013: $21.92, 2014: $24.9 million and $20.8$22.9 million, respectively).

12. Deferred revenue

Deferred revenue is comprised primarily of ESP and voucher promotions as follows:

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue

  $626.6    $601.2    $567.0  

Zale ESP deferred revenue

   99.1     —      —   

Voucher promotions and other

   5.8     15.5     6.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred revenue

  $731.5    $616.7    $573.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Presented as:

      

Current liabilities

  $211.1    $173.0    $154.6  

Non-current liabilities

   520.4     443.7     418.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred revenue

  $731.5    $616.7    $573.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

                                                        
   13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue, beginning of period

  $619.6   $563.4   $601.2   $549.7  

Plans sold

   53.9    46.1    118.1    101.4  

Revenues recognized

   (46.9  (42.5)  (92.7)  (84.1)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue, end of period

  $626.6   $567.0   $626.6   $567.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

                                                        
   13 weeks ended   26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
   August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Zale ESP deferred revenue, beginning of period

  $—        n/a    $—      n/a  

Plans acquired

   93.0    n/a     93.0    n/a  

Plans sold

   19.3    n/a     19.3    n/a  

Revenues recognized

   (13.2  n/a     (13.2  n/a  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zale ESP deferred revenue, end of period

  $99.1    n/a    $99.1    n/a  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

n/aNot applicable as the Acquisition occurred during Fiscal 2015.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

13. Warranty reserve

Sterling Jewelers and Zale provide a product lifetime diamond guarantee as long as six-month inspections are performed and certified by an authorized store representative. Provided the customer has complied with the six month inspection policy, the Company will replace, at no cost to the customer, any stone that chips, breaks or is lost from its original setting during normal wear. Management estimates the warranty accrual based on the lag of actual claims experience and the costs of such claims, inclusive of labor and material. Sterling Jewelers also provides a similar product lifetime guarantee on color gemstones. The warranty reserve for diamond and gemstone guarantee, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and other non-current liabilities, is as follows:

   13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Warranty reserve, beginning of period

  $19.4   $18.6   $19.1   $18.5  

Warranty obligations acquired

   28.8    —     28.8    —   

Warranty expense

   2.3    1.9    4.0    3.5  

Utilized

   (2.4  (1.9  (3.8  (3.4)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Warranty reserve, end of period

  $48.1   $18.6   $48.1   $18.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Presented as:

      

Current liabilities

  $17.6    $6.7    $6.6  

Non-current liabilities

   30.5     12.4     12.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total warranty reserve

  $48.1    $19.1    $18.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

14. Investments

Investments in debt and equity securities are held by certain insurance subsidiaries acquired as part of the Acquisition,and are reported as other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Investments are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices for identical or similar securities.securities in active markets. All investments are classified as available-for-sale.

Investments consist ofavailable-for-sale and include the following:

   August 2, 2014   August 3, 2013 
(in millions)  Cost   Fair Value   Cost   Fair Value 

US Treasury securities

  $10.0    $9.9    $n/a    $n/a  

US government agency securities

   1.3     1.3     n/a     n/a  

Corporate bonds and notes

   8.7     8.6     n/a     n/a  

Corporate equity securities

   2.5     2.5     n/a     n/a  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $22.5    $22.3    $n/a    $n/a 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

n/aNot applicable as all investments were acquired as part of the Acquisition that occurred during Fiscal 2015.

 August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Cost Unrealized Gain (Loss) Fair Value Cost Unrealized Gain (Loss) Fair Value Cost Unrealized Gain (Loss) Fair Value
US Treasury securities$9.2
 $(0.3) $8.9
 $9.7
 $(0.1) $9.6
 $10.0
 $(0.1) $9.9
US government agency securities1.0
 (0.1) 0.9
 1.4
 
 1.4
 1.3
 
 1.3
Corporate bonds and notes9.9
 
 9.9
 10.6
 0.2
 10.8
 8.7
 (0.1) 8.6
Corporate equity securities3.4
 0.1
 3.5
 3.5
 (0.1) 3.4
 2.5
 
 2.5
Total investments$23.5
 $(0.3) $23.2
 $25.2
 $
 $25.2
 $22.5
 $(0.2) $22.3
At August 2, 2014,1, 2015, the carrying value of investments included a net unrealized loss of $0.2$0.3 million, which is included in OCI.AOCI. Realized gains and losses on investments are determined on the specific identification basis. There were no material net realized gains or losses during the 13 orand 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 (13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014.2014: none). Investments with a carrying value of $7.4$7.2 million were on deposit with various state insurance departments at August 1, 2015 (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014,2014: $7.2 million and $7.4 million, respectively), as required by law.

Debt

Investments in debt securities outstanding as of August 2, 20141, 2015 mature as follows:

(in millions)  Cost   Fair Value 

Less than one year

  $1.8    $1.8  

Year two through year five

   11.1     11.0  

Year six through year ten

   7.0     6.9  

After ten years

   0.1     0.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $20.0    $19.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

15. Financial instruments and fair value

Signet’s principal financial instruments are comprised of cash, cash deposits/investments and overdrafts, accounts receivable and payable, derivatives, US Treasury and government agency securities, corporate bonds and equity securities, a revolving credit facility and long-term debt. Signet does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.

(in millions)Cost Fair Value
Less than one year$1.5
 $1.5
Year two through year five10.6
 10.3
Year six through year ten7.9
 7.8
After ten years0.1
 0.1
Total investment in debt securities$20.1
 $19.7
14. Derivatives
Derivative transactions are used by Signet for risk management purposes to address risks inherent in Signet’s business operations and sources of finance.financing. The main risks arising from Signet’s operations are market risk including foreign currency risk, and commodity risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. Signet uses thesederivative financial instruments to manage and mitigate these risks under policies reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.

Board. Signet does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.

Market risk

Signet generates revenues and incurs expenses in US dollars, Canadian dollars and British pounds. As a portion of the UK Jewelry purchases and the purchases made by the Canadian operations of the Zale division are denominated in US dollars, Signet enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign currency option contracts and foreign currency swaps to manage this exposure to the US dollar.


18


Signet holds a fluctuating amount of British pounds cash reflecting the cash generative characteristics of the UK Jewelry division. Signet’s objective is to minimize net foreign exchange exposure to the income statement on British pound denominated items through managing this level of cash, British pound denominated intercompanyintra-entity balances and US dollar to British pound swaps. In order to manage the foreign exchange exposure and minimize the level of British pound cash held by Signet,funds denominated in the British pound, dividends are paid regularly by British pound denominated subsidiaries pay dividends regularly to their immediate holding companies and excess British pounds are sold in exchange for US dollars.

Signet’s policy is to minimize the impact of precious metal commodity price volatility on operating results through the use of outright forward purchases of, or by entering into options to purchase, precious metals within treasury guidelines approved by the Board of Directors.Board. In particular, Signet undertakes some hedging of its requirementrequirements for gold through the use of options, net zero-cost collar arrangements (a combination of call and put option contracts), forward contracts and commodity purchasing, while fluctuations in the cost of diamonds are not hedged.

Liquidity risk

Signet’s objective is to ensure that it has access to, or the ability to generate sufficient cash from either internal or external sources in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet its commitments as they become due and payable. Signet manages liquidity risks as part of its overall risk management policy. Management produces forecasting and budgeting information that is reviewed and monitored by the Board of Directors.Board. Cash generated from operations and external financing are the main sources of funding supplementing Signet’s resources in meeting liquidity requirements.

The main external sourcesources of funding isare an amended credit facility, senior unsecured notes and securitized credit card receivables, as described below in Note 19.

17.

Interest rate risk

Signet has exposure to movements in interest rates associated with cash and borrowings. Signet may enter into various interest rate protection agreements in order to limit the impact of movements in interest rates on its cash or borrowings. There were norates.
Interest rate swap (designated) — This contract was entered into to reduce the consolidated interest rate protection agreements outstandingrisk associated with variable rate, long-term debt. The Company designates this derivative as a cash flow hedge of the variability in expected cash outflows of interest payments. The Company entered into an interest rate swap in March 2015 with an aggregate notional amount of $300.0 million that is scheduled to mature through April 2019. Under this contract, the Company agrees to exchange, at August 2, 2014, February 1, 2014specified intervals, the difference between fixed contract rates and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts. The Company has effectively converted a portion of its variable-rate senior unsecured term loan into fixed-rate debt. 
The fair value of the swap is presented within the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and the Company recognizes any changes in the fair value as an adjustment of AOCI within equity to the extent the swap is effective. The ineffective portion, if any, is recognized in current period earnings. As interest expense is accrued on the debt obligation, amounts in AOCI related to the interest rate swap are reclassified into income resulting in a net interest expense on the hedged amount of the underlying debt obligation equal to the effective yield of the fixed rate of the swap. In the event that an interest rate swap is dedesignated prior to maturity, gains or August 3, 2013.

losses in AOCI remain deferred and are reclassified into earnings in the periods in which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

Credit risk and concentrations of credit risk

Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted. Signet does not anticipate non-performance by counterparties of its financial instruments, except for customer in-house financing receivables as disclosed in Note 8.9 of which no single customer represents a significant portion of the Company’s receivable balance. Signet does not require collateral or other security to support cash investments or financial instruments with credit risk; however, it is Signet’s policy to only hold cash and cash equivalent investments and to transact financial instruments with financial institutions with a certain minimum credit rating. Management does not believe Signet is exposed to any significant concentrations of credit risk that arise from cash and cash equivalent investments, derivatives or accounts receivable.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Derivatives

Commodity and foreign currency risks
The following types of derivative financial instruments are utilized by Signet:

Signet to mitigate certain risk exposures related to changes in commodity prices and foreign exchange rates:

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (designated) — These contracts, which are principally in US dollars, are entered into in order to limit the impact of movements in foreign exchange rates on forecasted foreign currency purchases. The total notional amount of these foreign currency contracts outstanding as of August 2, 20141, 2015 was $34.2$17.7 million (February 1, 2014(January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013: $42.32, 2014: $23.5 million and $50.3$34.2 million, respectively). These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges and will be settled over the next 129 months (February 1, 2014(January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013:2, 2014: 12 months and 1812 months, respectively).


19


Forward foreign currency exchange contracts (undesignated) — Foreign currency contracts not designated as cash flow hedges are used to limit the impact of movements in foreign exchange rates on recognized foreign currency payables and to hedge currency flows through Signet’s bank accounts to mitigate Signet’s exposure to foreign currency exchange risk in its cash and borrowings. The total notional amount of these foreign currency contracts outstanding as of August 1, 2015 was $4.2 million (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014 was2014: $40.3 million and $27.7 million, (February 1, 2014 and August 3, 2013: $22.1 million and $58.1 million, respectively).

Commodity forward purchase contracts and net zero-cost collar arrangements (designated) — These contracts are entered into in order to reduce Signet’s exposure to significant movements in the price of the underlying precious metal raw material. The total notional amount of these commodity derivative contracts outstanding as of August 2, 20141, 2015 was $27.1 million (February 1, 2014106,000 ounces of gold (January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013: $63.0 million2, 2014: 81,000 ounces and $0.0 million,21,000 ounces, respectively). These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges and will be settled over the next 717 months (February 1, 2014(January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013: 122, 2014: 11 months and 07 months, respectively).

The bank counterparties to the derivative instruments expose Signet to credit-related losses in the event of their non-performance. However, to mitigate that risk, Signet only contracts with counterparties that meet certain minimum requirements under its counterparty risk assessment process. As of August 2, 2014,1, 2015, Signet believes that this credit risk did not materially change the fair value of the foreign currency or commodity contracts.

The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheets:

   Derivative assets 
        Fair value 
(in millions)  Balance sheet location   August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

      

Foreign currency contracts

   Other current assets    $—    $—    $1.5  

Foreign currency contracts

   Other assets     —     —     0.1  

Commodity contracts

   Other current assets     0.7    0.8    —   

Commodity contracts

   Other assets     —     —     —   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    $0.7   $0.8   $1.6  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

      

Foreign currency contracts

   Other current assets     0.3    0.2    0.1  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total derivative assets

    $1.0   $1.0   $1.7  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Derivative liabilities 
        Fair value 
(in millions)  Balance sheet location   August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014 
  August 3,
2013
 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

      

Foreign currency contracts

   Other current liabilities    $(1.9) $(2.1) $—   

Foreign currency contracts

   Other liabilities     —     —     —   

Commodity contracts

   Other current liabilities     (0.1)  (0.8)  —   

Commodity contracts

   Other liabilities     —     —     —   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    $(2.0) $(2.9) $—   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

      

Foreign currency contracts

   Other current liabilities     —     —     —   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total derivative liabilities

    $(2.0) $(2.9) $—   
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

 Fair value of derivative assets
(in millions)Balance sheet location August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:       
Foreign currency contractsOther current assets $0.1
 $1.0
 $
Commodity contractsOther current assets 
 6.3
 0.7
   0.1
 7.3
 0.7
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:       
Foreign currency contractsOther current assets 
 0.1
 0.3
Total derivative assets  $0.1
 $7.4
 $1.0
 Fair value of derivative liabilities
(in millions)Balance sheet location August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:       
Foreign currency contractsOther current liabilities $(0.3) $
 $(1.9)
Commodity contractsOther current liabilities (6.7) 
 (0.1)
Commodity contractsOther liabilities (0.2) 
 
Interest rate swapsOther liabilities (0.9) 
 
   (8.1) 
 (2.0)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:       
Foreign currency contractsOther current liabilities 
 
 
Total derivative liabilities  $(8.1) $
 $(2.0)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

The following table summarizes the pre-tax gains (losses) recorded in accumulated OCIAOCI for derivatives designated in cash flow hedging relationships:

(in millions)

  August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Foreign currency contracts

  $(3.2 $(2.3 $2.3  

Commodity contracts

   (4.9)(1)   (18.8)(1)  (28.6)(1) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $(8.1) $(21.1) $(26.3)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)As of August 2, 2014, losses recorded in accumulated OCI include $6.2 million related to commodity contracts terminated prior to contract maturity in Fiscal 2014 (February 1, 2014 and August 3, 2013: $18.2 million and $27.7 million, respectively).

(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Foreign currency contracts$0.4
 $0.9
 $(3.2)
Commodity contracts(8.3) 5.7
 (4.9)
Interest rate swaps(0.9) 
 
Total$(8.8) $6.6
 $(8.1)

20


The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges in OCI and the condensed consolidated income statements:

Foreign currency contracts

        13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 

(in millions)

  Income statement caption   August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

(Losses) gains recorded in accumulated OCI, beginning of period

    $(3.6) $1.6   $(2.3) $1.3  

Current period gains (losses) recognized in OCI

     0.1    0.9    (1.2  1.4  

Losses (gains) reclassified from accumulated OCI to net income

   Cost of sales     0.3    (0.2  0.3    (0.4)
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Losses) gains recorded in accumulated OCI, end of period

    $(3.2) $2.3   $(3.2) $2.3  
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)Income statement caption August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Gains (losses) recorded in AOCI, beginning of period  $0.8
 $(3.6) $0.9
 $(2.3)
Current period losses recognized in OCI  (0.4) 0.1
 (0.6) (1.2)
Losses reclassified from AOCI to net incomeCost of sales 
 0.3
 0.1
 0.3
Gains (losses) recorded in AOCI, end of period  $0.4
 $(3.2) $0.4
 $(3.2)

Commodity contracts

        13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 

(in millions)

  Income statement caption   August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

(Losses) gains recorded in accumulated OCI, beginning of period

    $(9.4) $(19.3 $(18.8) $(0.5)

Current period (losses) gains recognized in OCI

     (0.3  (9.5  1.7    (27.5

Losses (gains) reclassified from accumulated OCI to net income

   Cost of sales     4.8    0.2    12.2    (0.6)
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Losses) gains recorded in accumulated OCI, end of period

    $(4.9) $(28.6) $(4.9) $(28.6)
    

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)Income statement caption August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
(Losses) gains recorded in AOCI, beginning of period  $(2.0) $(9.4) $5.7
 $(18.8)
Current period (losses) gains recognized in OCI  (6.6) (0.3) (14.6) 1.7
Losses reclassified from AOCI to net incomeCost of sales 0.3
 4.8
 0.6
 12.2
Losses recorded in AOCI, end of period  $(8.3) $(4.9) $(8.3) $(4.9)

Interest rate swaps
   13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)Income statement caption August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
(Losses) gains recorded in AOCI, beginning of period  $(0.6) $
 $
 $
Current period losses recognized in OCI  (1.1) 
 (2.0) 
Losses reclassified from AOCI to net incomeInterest expense, net 0.8
 
 1.1
 
Losses recorded in AOCI, end of period  $(0.9) $
 $(0.9) $
There was no material ineffectiveness related to the Company’s derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships duringfor the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015 and August 3, 2013, respectively.2, 2014. Based on current valuations, the Company expects approximately $7.3$7.8 million of net pre-tax derivative losses to be reclassified out of accumulated OCIAOCI into earnings within the next 12 months, of which $6.2 million will be recognized in the remaining six months of Fiscal 2015.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

months.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

The following table presents the effects of the Company’s derivatives instruments not designated as cash flow hedges in the condensed consolidated income statements:

       13 weeks ended   26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  Income statement caption   August 2,
2014
   August 3,
2013
   August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

         

Foreign currency contracts

   Other operating income, net    $—     $3.0    $(1.6) $2.8  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    $—     $3.0    $(1.6) $2.8  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income
(in millions)Income statement caption 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:  August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Foreign currency contractsOther operating income, net $0.7
 $
 $0.4
 $(1.6)
Total  $0.7
 $
 $0.4
 $(1.6)

21


15. Fair value

measurement

The estimated fair value of Signet’s financial instruments held or issued to finance Signet’s operations is summarized below. Certain estimates and judgments were required to develop the fair value amounts. The fair value amounts shown below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Signet would realize upon disposition nor do they indicate Signet’s intent or ability to dispose of the financial instrument. Assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1—quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

Level 2—observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data

Level 3—unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data

Signet determines fair value based upon quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. The methods Signet uses to determine fair value on an instrument-specific basis are detailed below:

  August 2, 2014  February 1, 2014  August 3, 2013 
(in millions) Carrying
Value
  Quoted
market
prices
for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
  Significant other
observable
inputs

(Level 2)
  Carrying
Value
  Quoted
market
prices
for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
  Significant other
observable
inputs

(Level 2)
  Carrying
Value
  Quoted
market
prices
for
identical
assets
(Level 1)
  Significant other
observable
inputs

(Level 2)
 

Assets:

         

US Treasury securities

 $9.9   $9.9   $—     $—     $—     $—     $—     $—     $—    

Corporate equity securities

  2.5    2.5    —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Foreign currency contracts

  0.3    —      0.3    0.2    —      0.2    1.7    —      1.7  

Commodity contracts

  0.7    —      0.7    0.8    —      0.8    —      —      —    

US government agency securities

  1.3    —      1.3    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Corporate bonds and notes

  8.6    —      8.6    —      —      —      —      —      —    

Liabilities:

         

Foreign currency contracts

  (1.9  —      (1.9  (2.1  —      (2.1  —      —      —    

Commodity contracts

  (0.1  —      (0.1  (0.8  —      (0.8  —      —      —    

 August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Carrying Value Quoted prices in
active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 Carrying Value Quoted prices in
active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 Carrying Value Quoted prices in
active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
Assets:         
US Treasury securities$8.9
 $8.9
 $
 $9.6
 $9.6
 $
 $9.9
 $9.9
 $
Corporate equity securities3.5
 3.5
 
 3.4
 3.4
 
 2.5
 2.5
 
Foreign currency contracts0.1
 
 0.1
 1.1
 
 1.1
 0.3
 
 0.3
Commodity contracts
 
 
 6.3
 
 6.3
 0.7
 
 0.7
US government agency securities0.9
 
 0.9
 1.4
 
 1.4
 1.3
 
 1.3
Corporate bonds and notes9.9
 
 9.9
 10.8
 
 10.8
 8.6
 
 8.6
Total assets$23.3
 $12.4
 $10.9
 $32.6
 $13.0
 $19.6
 $23.3
 $12.4
 $10.9
                  
Liabilities:                 
Foreign currency contracts$(0.3) $
 $(0.3) $
 $
 $
 $(1.9) $
 $(1.9)
Commodity contracts(6.9) 
 (6.9) 
 
 
 (0.1) 
 (0.1)
Interest rate swaps(0.9) 
 (0.9) 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities$(8.1) $
 $(8.1) $
 $
 $
 $(2.0) $
 $(2.0)
Investments in US Treasury securities and corporate equity securities are based on quoted market prices for identical instruments in active markets, and therefore were classified as a Level 1 measurement in the fair value hierarchy. Investments in US government agency securities and corporate bonds and notes are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and therefore were classified as a Level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy (seehierarchy. See Note 1413 for additional information related to our investments).

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

the Company’s available-for-sale investments. The fair value of derivative financial instruments has been determined based on market value equivalents at the balance sheet date, taking into account the current interest rate environment, foreign currency forward rates or commodity forward rates. rates, and therefore were classified as a Level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 14 for additional information related to the Company’s derivatives.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these amounts.


22


The fair values of long-term debt instruments were determined using quoted market prices in inactive markets or discounted cash flows based upon current observable market interest rates and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 17 for classification between current and long-term debt. The carrying amount and fair value of outstanding debt at August 1, 2015, January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014 were as follows:

   August 2, 2014   February 1, 2014   August 3, 2013 
(in millions)  Carrying
Value
   Fair Value   Carrying
Value
   Fair Value   Carrying
Value
   Fair Value 

Outstanding debt(1):

            

Senior notes (Level 1)

  $398.4    $400.0    $     $     $     $   

Securitization facility (Level 2)

   600.0     600.0                          

Term loan (Level 2)

   400.0     400.0          

Capital lease obligations (Level 2)

   1.8     1.8                          
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total outstanding debt

  $1,400.2    $1,401.8    $     $—     $     $   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)See Note 19 – Loans, overdrafts and long-term debt for classification between current and long-term debt.

The fair value of long-term debt was determined using quoted market prices or discounted cash flows based upon current borrowing rates. See Note 19 – Loans, overdrafts and long-term debt.

 August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
(in millions)Carrying
Value
 Fair Value Carrying
Value
 Fair Value Carrying
Value
 Fair Value
Outstanding debt:           
Senior notes (Level 2)$398.5
 $409.0
 $398.5
 $415.3
 $398.4
 $400.0
Securitization facility (Level 2)600.0
 600.0
 600.0
 600.0
 600.0
 600.0
Term loan (Level 2)380.0
 380.0
 390.0
 390.0
 400.0
 400.0
Capital lease obligations (Level 2)0.6
 0.6
 1.2
 1.2
 1.8
 1.8
Total outstanding debt$1,379.1
 $1,389.6
 $1,389.7
 $1,406.5
 $1,400.2
 $1,401.8
16. Pensions

Pension plans

Signet operates a defined benefit pension plan in the UK (the “UK Plan”) for participating eligible employees of the UK Jewelry division. The components of net periodic pension benefit werecost for the UK Plan are as follows:

   13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Components of net periodic pension benefit (cost):

     

Service cost

  $(0.6) $(0.6) $(1.2) $(1.2)

Interest cost

   (2.5)  (2.3)  (5.0)  (4.6)

Expected return on UK Plan assets

   3.7    3.2    7.5    6.4  

Amortization of unrecognized prior service credit

   0.5    0.3    0.9    0.7  

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss

   (0.5)  (0.5)  (1.0)  (1.1)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic pension benefit (cost)

  $0.6   $0.1   $1.2   $0.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Components of net periodic pension benefit (cost):       
Service cost$(0.7) $(0.6) $(1.3) $(1.2)
Interest cost(2.0) (2.5) (3.9) (5.0)
Expected return on UK Plan assets3.0
 3.7
 5.8
 7.5
Amortization of unrecognized net prior service credit0.6
 0.5
 1.1
 0.9
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss(0.9) (0.5) (1.7) (1.0)
Net periodic pension benefit$
 $0.6
 $
 $1.2
In the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014,1, 2015, Signet contributed $2.2$1.5 million to the UK Plan and expects to contribute a minimum aggregate of $4.2$2.4 million at current exchange rates to the UK Plan in Fiscal 2015. These2016. The level of contributions areis in accordance with an agreed upon deficit recovery plan and based on the results of the actuarial valuation as of April 5, 2012.


23


17. CommitmentsLoans, overdrafts and contingencieslong-term debt

Legal proceedings

As previously reported,

(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Current liabilities – loans and overdrafts:     
Revolving credit facility$
 $
 $
Current portion of senior unsecured term loan30.0
 25.0
 20.0
Current portion of capital lease obligations0.4
 0.9
 1.1
Bank overdrafts51.6
 71.6
 10.1
Total loans and overdrafts82.0
 97.5
 31.2
      
Long-term debt:     
Senior unsecured notes due 2024, net of unamortized discount398.5
 398.5
 398.4
Securitization facility600.0
 600.0
 600.0
Senior unsecured term loan350.0
 365.0
 380.0
Capital lease obligations0.2
 0.3
 0.7
Total long-term debt$1,348.7
 $1,363.8
 $1,379.1
      
Total loans, overdrafts and long-term debt$1,430.7
 $1,461.3
 $1,410.3
Revolving credit facility and term loan (the "Credit Facility")
The Company has a $400 million senior unsecured multi-currency multi-year revolving credit facility agreement that was entered into in March 2008,May 2011. The agreement was subsequently amended in May 2014 to extend the maturity date to 2019 and expand the agreement to include a groupnew $400 million term loan. The $400 million five-year senior unsecured term loan requires the Company to make scheduled quarterly principal payments commencing on November 1, 2014 equal to the amounts per annum of private plaintiffs (the “Claimants”) filed a class action lawsuit for an unspecifiedthe original principal amount against Sterling Jewelers Inc. (“Sterling”), a subsidiary of Signet,the term loan as follows: 5% in the US District Courtfirst year, 7.5% in the second year, 10% in the third year, 12.5% in the fourth year and 15% in the fifth year after the initial payment date, with the balance due on May 27, 2019. As of August 1, 2015, $380.0 million remained outstanding on the term loan. Excluding impact of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges discussed in Note 14, the term loan had a weighted average interest rate of 1.45% through the second quarter of Fiscal 2016.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin, plus, at the Company’s option, either (a) a base rate or (b) a LIBOR rate. The Credit Facility provides that the Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty other than reimbursement of the lender’s redeployment and breakage costs in certain cases. In addition, the Credit Facility contains various customary representations and warranties, financial reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants. As with the Company’s prior credit facility, the Company is required to maintain at all times a leverage ratio of no greater than 2.50 to 1.00 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.40 to 1.00, both determined as of the end of each fiscal quarter for the Southern Districttrailing twelve months.
Capitalized fees relating to the amended Credit Facility total $6.7 million. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of New York alleging that US store-level employment practices are discriminatoryAugust 1, 2015 was $1.5 million (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014: $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively). Amortization relating to these fees of $0.3 million and $0.6 million was recorded as to compensation and promotional activities with respect to gender. In June 2008, the District Court referred the matter to private arbitration where the Claimants sought to proceed on a class-wide basis. Discovery has been completed. The Claimants filed a motion for class certification and Sterling opposed the motion. A hearing on the class certification motion was held in late February 2014. The motion is now pending before the Arbitrator.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Also, as previously reported, on September 23, 2008, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a lawsuit against Sterlinginterest expense in the US District Courtcondensed consolidated income statements for the Western District of New York. The EEOC’s lawsuit alleges that Sterling engaged in intentional13 and disparate impact gender discrimination with respect to pay and promotions of female retail store employees from January26 weeks ended August 1, 2003 to the present. The EEOC asserts claims for unspecified monetary relief and non-monetary relief against the Company on behalf of a class of female employees subjected to these alleged practices. Non-expert fact discovery closed in mid-May 2013. In September 2013, Sterling made a motion for partial summary judgment on procedural grounds, which was referred to a Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge heard oral arguments on the summary judgment motion in December 2013. On January 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report, Recommendation and Order, recommending that the Court grant Sterling’s motion for partial summary judgment and dismiss the EEOC’s claims in their entirety. The EEOC filed its objections to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling and Sterling filed its response thereto. The District Court Judge heard oral arguments on the EEOC’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling on March 7, 2014 and on March 11, 2014 entered an order dismissing the action with prejudice. On May 12, 2014 the EEOC filed its Notice of Appeal of the District Court Judge’s dismissal of the action to United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeal is pending.

Sterling denies the allegations of both parties and has been defending these cases vigorously. At this point, no outcome or amount of loss is able to be estimated.

Prior to the Acquisition, Zale Corporation was a defendant in three purported class action lawsuits, Tessa Hodge v. Zale Delaware, Inc., d/b/a Piercing Pagoda which was filed on April 23, 2013 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino; Naomi Tapia v. Zale Corporation which was filed on July 3, 2013 in the US District Court, Southern District of California; and Melissa Roberts v. Zale Delaware, Inc. which was filed on October 7, 2013 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. All three cases include allegations that Zale Corporation violated various wage and hour labor laws. Relief is sought on behalf of current and former Piercing Pagoda and Zale Corporation’s employees. The lawsuits seek to recover damages, penalties and attorneys’ fees as a result of the alleged violations. Without admitting or conceding any liability, the Company has reached a tentative agreement to settle the Hodge and Roberts matters for an immaterial amount.

There is no assurance that the settlement will become final or that the Court will approve the settlement. The Company is investigating the underlying allegations of the Naomi Tapia v. Zale Corporation matter and intends to vigorously defend its position against them. The Company cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, for this matter.

Litigation Challenging the Company’s Acquisition of Zale Corporation

Five putative stockholder class action lawsuits challenging the Company’s acquisition of Zale Corporation have been filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: Breyer v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9388-VCP, filed February 24, 2014; Stein v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9408-VCP, filed March 3, 2014; Singh v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9409-VCP, filed March 3, 2014; Smart v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9420-VCP, filed March 6, 2014; and Pill v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9440-VCP, filed March 12, 2014 (collectively, the “Actions”). Each of these Actions is brought by a purported former holder of Zale Corporation common stock, both individually and on behalf of a putative class of former Zale Corporation stockholders. The Court of Chancery consolidated the Actions on March 25, 2014 (the “Consolidated Action”), and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on April 23, 2014. The Consolidated Action names as defendants Zale Corporation, the members of the board of directors of Zale Corporation, the Company, and a merger-related subsidiary of the Company. The Consolidated Action alleges that the Zale Corporation directors breached their fiduciary duties to Zale Corporation stockholders in connection with their consideration and approval of the merger agreement by failing to maximize stockholder value and agreeing to an inadequate merger price and to deal terms that deter higher bids. The Consolidated Action also alleges that the Zale Corporation directors issued a materially misleading and incomplete proxy statement regarding the merger. Further, the Consolidated Action alleges that Zale Corporation and the Company aided and abetted the Zale Corporation directors’ breaches of fiduciary duty. On May 23, 2014, the Chancery Court of Chancery denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the consummation of the merger. The Consolidated Action seeks, among other things, rescission of the merger or damages, as well as attorneys’ and experts’ fees.

At this point, plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or quantified their claim for damages or fees. As a result, we are unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Appraisal Litigation

Following the consummation of the Company’s acquisition of Zale Corporation, on June 4, 2014, two former Zale Corporation stockholders, who, combined, allege ownership of approximately 3.904 million shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock, filed a petition for appraisal pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 262 in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, captioned Merion Capital L.P. et al. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 9731-VCP (the “Merion Action”). On August 26, 2014, another former Zale Corporation stockholder, who alleges ownership of approximately 2.450 million shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock, filed a second petition for appraisal, captioned TIG Arbitrage Opportunity Fund I, L.P. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 10070-VCP (the “TIG Action” and, together with the Merion Action, the “Appraisal Actions”). Petitioners in the Appraisal Actions seek a judgment awarding them, among other things, the fair value of their Zale Corporation shares plus interest.

On June 30, 2014, Zale Corporation filed its answer to the Merion Action petition and a verified list pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 262(f) naming, as of that filing, the persons that purported to demand appraisal of shares of Zale Corporation common stock. Since that filing, Zale Corporation has received a number of dissent withdrawals from stockholders who had previously demanded appraisal. At this point, the total number of shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock for which appraisal has been demanded and not requested to be withdrawn is approximately 9.0 million, inclusive of the shares allegedly held by petitioners in the Appraisal Actions. The parties in the Merion Action are currently engaged in discovery. The court has not yet set a hearing date for either of the petitions in the Appraisal Actions.

At this point, discovery in the Merion Action has just commenced, and none of the petitioners in the Appraisal Actions has claimed an amount of fair value. As a result, we are unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation.

In the ordinary course of business, Signet may be subject, from time to time, to various other proceedings, lawsuits, disputes or claims incidental to its business, which the Company believe are not significant to Signet’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

18. Share-based compensation expense

Signet recorded share-based compensation expense of $4.0 million and $7.22015, respectively ($0.3 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively, related torespectively). In addition, capitalized fees associated with the Omnibus Plans and Saving Share Plans ($3.5May 2011 credit facility agreement of $0.7 million and $6.5$0.9 million forwere written-off in the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 3, 2013, respectively).

19. Loans, overdrafts2, 2014 upon execution of the amended credit agreement in May 2014.

At August 1, 2015, January 31, 2015 and long-term debt

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
   February 1,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Current liabilities – loans and overdrafts:

      

Revolving credit facility

  $—     $—     $—   

Current portion of term loan

   20.0     —      —   

Current portion of capital lease obligations

   1.1     —      —   

Bank overdrafts

   10.1     19.3     1.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans and overdrafts

   31.2     19.3     1.7  

Long-term debt:

      

Senior notes, net of unamortized discount

   398.4     —      —   

Securitization facility

   600.0     —      —   

Term loan

   380.0     —      —   

Capital lease obligations

   0.7     —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

   1,379.1     —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans, overdrafts and long-term debt

  $1,410.3    $19.3    $1.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Credit facility

In May 2011, Signet entered into a $400 million senior unsecured multi-currency five yearAugust 2, 2014 there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility agreement (the “Credit Facility”).

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

There were no amounts outstanding under this Credit Facility as of February 1, 2014 and August 3, 2013. Signetfacility. The Company had stand-by letters of credit on this Credit Facilitythe revolving credit facility of $10.1$21.9 million, $25.4 million and $9.5$20.3 million as of FebruaryAugust 1, 20142015, January 31, 2015 and August 3, 2013, respectively. As of February 1, 2014 and August 3, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.

On May 27, 2014, the Credit Facility was amended in conjunction with the issuance of the new term loan. See “New term loan and amended revolving credit agreement” below. Capitalized amendment fees of $0.7 million relating to the Credit Facility agreement signed in May 2011 were written-off in the 13 week period ended August 2, 2014, upon executingrespectively, that reduce remaining availability under the amendedrevolving credit agreement in May 2014 (26 weeks ended August 2, 2014: $0.9 million).

facility.


24


On February 19, 2014, Signet entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Zale Corporation and concurrently received commitments for an $800 million 364-day unsecured bridge facility to finance the transaction. The bridge facility contained customary fees and incurred interest on any borrowings drawn on the facility. In May 2014, Signet executed its Zale acquisitionAcquisition financing as described below in Note 20,3, replacing the bridge facility commitments in addition to amending its Credit Facility as outlined above, issuing senior unsecured notes and securitizing credit card receivables. No amounts were drawn on the bridge facility commitments prior to replacement and fees of $4.0 million were incurred and capitalized. This agreement was subsequently replaced by the issuances of the long-term debt listed below,below. Fees of $4.0 million relating to this unsecured bridge facility were incurred and thereforecapitalized during the 13 weeks ended August 2, 2014, the remaining $3.2Fiscal 2015. Amortization relating to these fees of $0.8 million was recorded as interest expense in the condensed consolidated income statement (26for the 13 weeks ended August 2, 2014: $4.0 million).

IssuanceMay 3, 2014, with the remaining capitalized fees associated with the bridge facility of senior$3.2 million written off during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015.

Senior unsecured notes due 2024

On May 19, 2014, Signet UK Finance plc (“Signet UK Finance”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.700% senior unsecured notes due in 2024 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued under an effective registration statement previously filed with the SEC. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing December 15, 2014. The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed, on a full and unconditional basis, by the Company and by certain of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries (such subsidiaries, the “Guarantors”). The Notes were issued pursuant to a base indenture among the Company, Signet UK Finance, the Guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as trustee, with the indenture containing customary covenants and events of default provisions. The Company received proceeds from the offering of approximately $393.9 million, which were net of underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses.

Capitalized fees relating to the senior unsecured notes of $6.9 million were incurred, of which $5.7 million was paid and $1.2 million was accruedtotal $7.0 million. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of August 1, 2015 was $0.8 million (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014.2014: $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively). Amortization expense relating to these fees of $0.1 million and $0.3 million was recorded as interest expense in the condensed consolidated income statements for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015, respectively ($0.1 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014.

2014, respectively).

Asset-backed securitization facility

On May 15, 2014, the Company sold an undivided interest in certain credit card receivables to Sterling Jewelers Receivables Master Note Trust (the “Issuer”), a wholly-owned Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company and issued two-year revolving asset-backed variable funding notes to an unrelated third party conduitconduits pursuant to a master indenture dated as of November 2, 2001, as supplemented by the Series 2014-A indenture supplement dated as of May 15, 2014 among the Issuer, Sterling Jewelers Inc. (“SJI”("SJI") and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the indenture trustee. Under terms of the notes, the Issuer has obtained $600 million of financing from the unrelated third party commercial paper conduits sponsored by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., which indebtedness is secured by credit card receivables originated from time to time by SJI. The credit card receivables will ultimately be transferred to the Issuer and are serviced by SJI. Signet guarantees the performance by SJI of its obligations under the agreements associated with this financing arrangement. Borrowings under the asset-backed variable funding notes will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin.

Payments received from customers for balances outstanding on securitized credit card receivables are utilized to repay amounts outstanding under the facility each period, while proceeds from the facility are received for incremental credit card receivables originated when the receivables are pledged to the Issuer. Such payments received from customers and proceeds from the facility are reflected on a gross basis in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. As of August 1, 2015, $600.0 million remained outstanding under the securitization facility with a weighted average interest rate of 1.54% through the second quarter of Fiscal 2016.

Capitalized fees relating to the asset-backed securitization facility oftotal $2.8 million were incurred, of which $2.3 million was paid and $0.5 million was accruedmillion. Accumulated amortization related to these capitalized fees as of August 1, 2015 was $1.6 million (January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014.2014: $0.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively). Amortization expense relating to these fees of $0.2$0.3 million and $0.7 million was recorded as interest expense in the condensed consolidated income statements for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014.

New term loan and amended revolving credit agreement

On May 27, 2014, Signet amended and restated its existing credit agreement to (i) add a new $4001, 2015, respectively ($0.2 million term loan facility and (ii) amend its existing revolving credit facility. The new term loan facility is a $400 million 5-year senior unsecured facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., acting as administrative agent. Signet simultaneously amended and restated its existing revolving credit facility extending the maturity date to 2019. Borrowings under each of the term loan facility and the amended revolving credit facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin, plus, at Signet’s option, either (a) a base rate or (b) a LIBOR rate. The amended and restated credit agreement provides that Signet may voluntarily repay outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty other than reimbursement of the lender’s redeployment and breakage costs in certain cases.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Signet will be required to make scheduled quarterly payments commencing on November 1, 2014 equal to the amounts per annum of the original principal amount of the term loan as follows: 5% in the first year, 7.5% in the second year, 10% in the third year, 12.5% in the fourth year and 15% in the fifth year after the initial payment date, with the balance due on May 27, 2019.

The amended and restated credit agreement contains various customary representatives and warranties, financial reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants. As with Signet’s prior credit facility, Signet will be required to maintain at all times a leverage ratio of no greater than 2.50 to 1.00 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.40 to 1.00, both determined as of the end of each fiscal quarter of Signet for the trailing twelve months.

As of August 2, 2014, $400 million was drawn on the new term loan facility. In addition, there were no borrowings drawn on the amended revolving credit facility, with no intra-period borrowings. Signet had stand-by letters of credit of $20.3 million as of August 2, 2014.

Capitalized fees relating to the new term loan and amended revolving credit agreement of $6.6 million were incurred, of which $6.4 million was paid and $0.2 million was accrued as of August 2, 2014. Amortization expense relating to these fees of $0.3 million was recorded as interest expense in the condensed consolidated income statements for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014.

2014, respectively).

During the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, Signet amended the note purchase agreement associated with the asset-backed securitization facility to extend the term of the facility by one year to May 2017 with all terms substantially the same as the original agreement.
Other
As of August 1, 2015, January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.

Other

At

As of August 1, 2015, January 31, 2015 and August 2, 2014, February 1, 2014 and August 3, 2013, there were $10.1$51.6 million, $19.3$71.6 million and $1.7$10.1 million in overdrafts, respectively, which represent issued and outstanding checks where no bank balances exist with the right of offset.

Capital Lease Obligations

In


25


18. Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue is comprised primarily of extended service plans (“ESP”) and voucher promotions and other as follows:
(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue$691.4
 $668.9
 $626.6
Zale ESP deferred revenue132.3
 120.3
 99.1
Voucher promotions and other13.5
 22.7
 5.8
Total deferred revenue$837.2
 $811.9
 $731.5
      
Disclosed as:     
Current liabilities$230.2
 $248.0
 $211.1
Non-current liabilities607.0
 563.9
 520.4
Total deferred revenue$837.2
 $811.9
 $731.5
ESP deferred revenue
 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue, beginning of period$690.7
 $619.6
 $668.9
 $601.2
Plans sold59.1
 53.9
 128.4
 118.1
Revenue recognized(58.4) (46.9) (105.9) (92.7)
Sterling Jewelers ESP deferred revenue, end of period$691.4
 $626.6
 $691.4
 $626.6
 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Zale ESP deferred revenue, beginning of period$129.3
 $
 $120.3
 $
Plans acquired
 93.0
 
 93.0
Plans sold29.4
 19.3
 64.6
 19.3
Revenue recognized(26.4) (13.2) (52.6) (13.2)
Zale ESP deferred revenue, end of period$132.3
 $99.1
 $132.3
 $99.1
19. Warranty reserve
Sterling Jewelers and Zale Jewelry segments provide a product lifetime diamond guarantee as long as six-month inspections are performed and certified by an authorized store representative. Provided the Zale division, capital leases are entered into related to vehicles for field management. The vehicles are included in property, plant and equipment incustomer has complied with the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated over a four-year life. Capital leases, net of accumulated depreciation, included in property, plant and equipment as of August 2, 2014 totaled $1.7 million. The Acquisition occurred on May 29, 2014, and therefore amounts are not included as of February 1, 2014 or August 3, 2013.

20. Acquisitions

Botswana diamond polishing factory

On November 4, 2013, Signet acquired a diamond polishing factory in Gaborone, Botswana for $9.1 million. The acquisition expands the Company’s long-term diamond sourcing capabilities and provides resources forsix-month inspection policy, the Company to cut and polish stones.

The transaction was accounted for as a business combination during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, the Company finalized the valuation of net assets acquired. There werewill replace, at no material changescost to the valuation of net assets acquiredcustomer, any stone that chips, breaks or is lost from its original setting during normal wear. Management estimates the initial allocation reported during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014. The total consideration paid by the Company was funded through existing cash and allocated to the net assets acquiredwarranty accrual based on the final fair valueslag of actual claims experience and the costs of such claims, inclusive of labor and material. Sterling Jewelers also provides a similar product lifetime guarantee on color gemstones. The warranty reserve for diamond and gemstone guarantee, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and other non-current liabilities, is as follows: property, plant and equipment


26



 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Warranty reserve, beginning of period$44.6
 $19.4
 $44.9
 $19.1
Warranty obligations acquired
 28.8
 
 28.8
Warranty expense(1)
1.9
 2.3
 4.9
 4.0
Utilized(3.4) (2.4) (6.7) (3.8)
Warranty reserve, end of period$43.1
 $48.1
 $43.1
 $48.1
(1) Includes impact of acquisition accounting adjustment related to warranty obligations acquired in the Zale Acquisition.
(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Disclosed as:     
Current liabilities$17.6
 $17.2
 $17.6
Non-current liabilities25.5
 27.7
 30.5
At end of period$43.1
 $44.9
 $48.1
20. Share-based compensation
Signet recorded share-based compensation expense of $5.5$3.8 million and goodwill of $3.6 million. See Note 10 for additional information. None of the goodwill will be deductible for income tax purposes.

The results of operations related to the acquired diamond polishing factory are reported within the Other operating segment of Signet’s consolidated results and included in Signet’s condensed consolidated financial statements commencing on the date of acquisition in the Other operating segment.

Zale Corporation

On May 29, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Zale Corporation and Zale Corporation became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of Signet. The Acquisition reflects the Company’s strategy to diversify businesses and expand its footprint.

Under the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, Zale Corporation shareholders received $21 per share in cash for each outstanding share of common stock and the vesting, upon consummation of the Acquisition, of certain outstanding Zale Corporation restricted stock units and stock options, which converted into the right to receive the merger consideration. The consideration transferred in conjunction with the Acquisition was $1,458.0$7.1 million including $478.2 million to extinguish Zale Corporation’s existing debt. The Acquisition was funded by the Company through existing cash and the issuance of $1,400 million of long-term debt, including: (a) $400 million of senior unsecured notes due in 2024, (b) $600 million of two-year revolving asset-backed variable funding notes, and (c) a $400 million 5-year senior unsecured term loan facility. See Note 19 for additional information related to the Company’s long-term debt instruments.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

The transaction was accounted for as a business combination during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015. The following table summarizes the consideration transferred in conjunction with the Acquisition.

Calculation of consideration

(in millions except per share amounts)

  Amount 

Cash consideration paid to Zale Corporation shareholders ($21 per share)

  $910.2  

Cash consideration paid for settlement of Zale Corporation stock options, restricted share awards and long term incentive plan awards

   69.6  

Cash paid to extinguish Zale Corporation outstanding debt as of May 29, 2014

   478.2  
  

 

 

 

Total consideration transferred

  $1,458.0  
  

 

 

 

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Acquisition are recorded at acquisition date fair values. The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values identified for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Acquisition as of May 29, 2014:

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed

(in millions)  Amount 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $28.8  

Inventories

   855.6  

Other current assets

   22.5  

Property, plant and equipment

   104.2  

Intangible assets:

  

Trade names

   420.0  

Favorable leases

   50.2  

Deferred tax assets

   126.3  

Other assets

   25.4  

Current liabilities(1)

   (202.8

Deferred revenue

   (93.0)

Unfavorable leases

   (50.5)

Unfavorable contracts

   (65.6)

Deferred tax liabilities

   (263.6)

Other liabilities

   (24.6)
  

 

 

 

Fair value of net assets acquired

   932.9  

Goodwill

   525.1  
  

 

 

 

Total consideration transferred

  $1,458.0  
  

 

 

 

(1)Includes loans and overdrafts, accounts payable, income taxes payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

As the Acquisition occurred during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based upon a preliminary valuation, which the Company was still in the process of finalizing as of August 2, 2014. The estimates and assumptions utilized in the preliminary valuation are subject to change within the measurement period as additional information is obtained. The goodwill attributable to the Acquisition will not be amortizable or deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of acquisitions over the Company’s interest in fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired. As a result of the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed being preliminary as of August 2, 2014, the Company has not yet allocated goodwill attributable to the Acquisition to the reporting units. See Note 10 for additional information regarding goodwill.

The following unaudited consolidated pro forma information summarizes the results of operations for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, as if the Acquisition and1, 2015, respectively, related issuance of $1,400 million of long-term debt (see Note 19) had occurred as of February 2, 2013. The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information was prepared in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting under existing standards and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred if the Acquisition had been completed on the date indicated, nor is it indicative of the future operating results of the Company.

SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

   Pro forma - unaudited 
   13 weeks ended   26 weeks ended 
(in millions, except per share amounts)  August 2,
2014
   August 3,
2013
   August 2,
2014
   August 3,
2013
 

Pro forma sales

  $1,379.5    $1,285.1    $2,859.7    $2,708.0  

Pro forma net income

  $83.5    $53.4    $198.5    $145.2  

Pro forma earnings per share – basic

  $1.05    $0.67    $2.48    $1.80  

Pro forma earnings per share – diluted

  $1.04    $0.66    $2.48    $1.79  

The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information was prepared in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting under existing standards and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred if the Acquisition had been completed on the date indicated, nor is it indicative of the future operating results of the Company.

The unaudited pro forma information gives effect to actual operating results prior to the Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma information has been adjusted with respect to certain aspects of the Acquisition to reflect the following:

Acquisition accounting adjustments to reset deferred revenue associated with extended service plans sold by Zale Corporation prior to the Acquisition to fair value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the estimated costs remaining to be incurred for future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition, plus a reasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. Adjustment also reflects the impact of deferring the revenue associated with the lifetime extended service plans over a 10-year period as disclosed in Note 1.

Additional depreciationOmnibus Plan and amortization expenses that would have been recognized assuming fair value adjustments to the existing Zale Corporation assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including inventory, intangible assets, favorable and unfavorable leases, and unfavorable contracts.

Tax impact of the Company’s amended capital structure as a result of the Acquisition and related issuance of $1,400 million of long-term debt.

Adjustment of valuation allowances associated with U.S. and Canadian deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards.

Exclusion of acquisition-related costs of $30.8 million and $39.2, which were expensed during the 13Share Saving Plans (13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively. Also excluded were costs associated2014: $4.0 million and $7.2 million, respectively).

21. Commitments and contingencies
Legal proceedings
As previously reported, in March 2008, a group of private plaintiffs (the “Claimants”) filed a class action lawsuit for an unspecified amount against SJI, a subsidiary of Signet, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that US store-level employment practices are discriminatory as to compensation and promotional activities with respect to gender. In June 2008, the District Court referred the matter to private arbitration where the Claimants sought to proceed on a class-wide basis. The Claimants filed a motion for class certification and SJI opposed the motion. A hearing on the class certification motion was held in late February 2014. On February 2, 2015, the arbitrator issued a Class Determination Award in which she certified for a class-wide hearing Claimants’ disparate impact declaratory and injunctive relief class claim under Title VII, with a class period of July 22, 2004 through date of trial for the Claimants’ compensation claims and December 7, 2004 through date of trial for Claimants’ promotion claims. The arbitrator otherwise denied Claimants’ motion to certify a disparate treatment class alleged under Title VII, denied a disparate impact monetary damages class alleged under Title VII, and denied an opt-out monetary damages class under the Equal Pay Act. On February 9, 2015, Claimants filed an Emergency Motion To Restrict Communications With The Certified Class And For Corrective Notice. SJI filed its opposition to Claimants’ emergency motion on February 17, 2015, and a hearing was held on February 18, 2015. Claimants' motion was granted in part and denied in part in an order issued on March 16, 2015. Claimants filed a Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Title VII Claims for Disparate Treatment in Compensation on February 11, 2015. SJI filed its opposition to Claimants’ Motion for Reconsideration on March 4, 2015. Claimants’ reply was filed on March 16, 2015. Claimants’ Motion was denied in an order issued April 27, 2015. Claimants filed Claimants’ Motion for Conditional Certification of Claimants’ Equal Pay Act Claims and Authorization of Notice on March 6, 2015. SJI’s opposition was filed on May 1, 2015. Claimants filed their reply on June 5, 2015. SJI filed with the unsecured bridge facility discussedUS District Court for the Southern District of New York a Motion to Vacate the Arbitrator’s Class Certification Award on March 3, 2015. Claimants’ opposition was filed on March 23, 2015 and SJI’s reply was filed on April 3, 2015. SJI’s motion was heard on May 4, 2015. The parties await a ruling. On April 6, 2015, Claimants filed Claimants’ Motion for Clarification or in Note 19the Alternative Motion for Stay of $0.8 millionthe Effect of the Class Certification Award as to the Individual Intentional Discrimination Claims. SJI filed its opposition on May 12, 2015. Claimants’ reply was filed on May 22, 2015. Claimants’ motion was granted on June 15, 2015.

27


Also, as previously reported, on September 23, 2008, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a lawsuit against SJI in the US District Court for the Western District of New York. The EEOC’s lawsuit alleges that SJI engaged in intentional and $4.0 million,disparate impact gender discrimination with respect to pay and promotions of female retail store employees from January 1, 2003 to the present. The EEOC asserts claims for unspecified monetary relief and non-monetary relief against the Company on behalf of a class of female employees subjected to these alleged practices. Non-expert fact discovery closed in mid-May 2013. In September 2013, SJI made a motion for partial summary judgment on procedural grounds, which were expensed duringwas referred to a Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge heard oral arguments on the 13 and 26 weeks ended Augustsummary judgment motion in December 2013. On January 2, 2014, respectively. All amounts were reported within the Other segment.

Magistrate Judge issued his Report, Recommendation and Order, recommending that the Court grant SJI’s motion for partial summary judgment and dismiss the EEOC’s claims in their entirety. The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect future events that either haveEEOC filed its objections to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling and SJI filed its response thereto. The District Court Judge heard oral arguments on the EEOC’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s ruling on March 7, 2014 and on March 11, 2014 entered an order dismissing the action with prejudice. On May 12, 2014 the EEOC filed its Notice of Appeal of the District Court Judge’s dismissal of the action to United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  The parties fully briefed the appeal and oral argument occurred on May 5, 2015. The parties await a ruling.

SJI denies the allegations of the Claimants and EEOC and has been defending these cases vigorously. At this point, no outcome or may occur afterpossible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation is able to be estimated.
Prior to the Acquisition, including, but not limitedZale Corporation was a defendant in three purported class action lawsuits, Tessa Hodge v. Zale Delaware, Inc., d/b/a Piercing Pagoda which was filed on April 23, 2013 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino; Naomi Tapia v. Zale Corporation which was filed on July 3, 2013 in the US District Court, Southern District of California; and Melissa Roberts v. Zale Delaware, Inc. which was filed on October 7, 2013 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. All three cases include allegations that Zale Corporation violated various wage and hour labor laws. Relief is sought on behalf of current and former Piercing Pagoda and Zale Corporation’s employees. The lawsuits seek to recover damages, penalties and attorneys’ fees as a result of the anticipated realizationalleged violations. Without admitting or conceding any liability, the Company reached an agreement to settle the Hodge and Roberts matters for an immaterial amount. Final approval of expected operating synergiesthe settlement was granted on March 9, 2015 and the settlement was implemented.
On April 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification in subsequent periods. They also do not give effectthe Naomi Tapia v. Zale Corporation litigation. On May 22, 2015, the Company filed Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification under Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 23 and Collective Action Certification under 29 U.SC. §216(b). Plaintiff filed her Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification on June 3, 2015. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position in this litigation. At this point, no outcome or possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation is able to be estimated.
Litigation Challenging the Company’s Acquisition of Zale Corporation
Five putative stockholder class action lawsuits challenging the Company’s acquisition related costsof Zale Corporation were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware: Breyer v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9388-VCP, filed February 24, 2014; Stein v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9408-VCP, filed March 3, 2014; Singh v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9409-VCP, filed March 3, 2014; Smart v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9420-VCP, filed March 6, 2014; and Pill v. Zale Corp. et al., C.A. No. 9440-VCP, filed March 12, 2014 (collectively, the “Actions”). Each of these Actions was brought by a purported former holder of Zale Corporation common stock, both individually and on behalf of a putative class of former Zale Corporation stockholders.
The Court of Chancery consolidated the Actions on March 25, 2014 (the “Consolidated Action”), and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on April 23, 2014, which named as defendants Zale Corporation, the members of the board of directors of Zale Corporation, the Company, and a merger-related subsidiary of the Company, and alleged that the Company expectsZale Corporation directors breached their fiduciary duties to incurZale Corporation stockholders in connection with their consideration and approval of the Acquisition, including, butmerger agreement by failing to maximize stockholder value and agreeing to an inadequate merger price and to deal terms that deter higher bids. That complaint also alleged that the Zale Corporation directors issued a materially misleading and incomplete proxy statement regarding the merger and that Zale Corporation and the Company aided and abetted the Zale Corporation directors’ breaches of fiduciary duty. On May 23, 2014, the Court of Chancery denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the consummation of the merger.
On September 30, 2014, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting substantially similar claims and allegations as the prior complaint. The amended complaint added Zale Corporation’s former financial advisor, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, as a defendant for allegedly aiding and abetting the Zale Corporation directors’ breaches of fiduciary duty. The amended complaint no longer names as defendants Zale Corporation or the Company’s merger-related subsidiary. The amended complaint seeks, among other things, rescission of the merger or damages, as well as attorneys’ and experts’ fees. The defendant's motion to dismiss was heard by the Court of Chancery on May 20, 2015. The parties await a ruling from the Court on the Motion to Dismiss.
At this point, no outcome or possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation is able to be estimated.

28


Appraisal Litigation
Following the consummation of the acquisition of Zale Corporation by the Company, on June 4, 2014, two former Zale Corporation stockholders, who, combined, allege ownership of approximately 3.904 million shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock, filed a petition for appraisal pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 262 in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, captioned Merion Capital L.P. et al. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 9731-VCP. On August 26, 2014, another former Zale Corporation stockholder, who alleges ownership of approximately 2.450 million shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock, filed a second petition for appraisal, captioned TIG Arbitrage Opportunity Fund I, L.P. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 10070-VCP. On September 24, 2014, several former Zale Corporation stockholders, who allege ownership of approximately 2.427 million shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock, filed a third petition for appraisal, captioned The Gabelli ABC Fund et al. v. Zale Corp., C.A. No. 10162-VCP. On October 8, 2014, the Court of Chancery consolidated the Merion Capital, TIG, and Gabelli actions for all purposes (the “Appraisal Action”).
Petitioners in the Appraisal Action sought a judgment awarding them, among other things, the fair value of their Zale Corporation shares. “Fair value” under Section 8 Del. C. 262(h) is “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value.” Section 8 Del. C. 262 provides that unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment.
The total number of shares of Zale Corporation’s common stock for which appraisal has been demanded and not limitedrequested to additional professional fees, employee integration, retentionbe withdrawn is approximately 8.8 million, inclusive of the shares allegedly held by petitioners in the Appraisal Action.
On August 12, 2015, the parties in the Appraisal Action entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”). The terms of the Settlement Agreement provide for the payment to petitioners of $21.00 per share of Zale Corporation common stock (the consideration offered in the Company’s acquisition of Zale Corporation) plus a total sum of $34,246,984, to be allocated among petitioners, which proceeds are inclusive of and severance costs.

21.in satisfaction of any statutory interest that may have accrued on petitioners’ shares pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 262. On August 12, 2015, the Court of Chancery dismissed the Appraisal Action pursuant to the Settlement Agreement as to all former Zale Corporation stockholders who have submitted and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal. As of August 1, 2015, the Company has recorded an accrual for $34.2 million in the accrued expenses and other current liabilities line of the condensed consolidated balance sheet related to the Settlement Agreement. 

In the ordinary course of business, Signet may be subject, from time to time, to various other proceedings, lawsuits, disputes or claims incidental to its business, which the Company believes are not significant to Signet’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
22. Condensed consolidating financial information

The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information has been prepared and presented pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.” We and certain of our subsidiaries have guaranteed the obligations under certain debt securities that have been issued by Signet UK Finance plc. The following presents the condensed consolidating financial information for: (i) the indirect Parent Company (Signet Jewelers Limited); (ii) the Issuer of the guaranteed obligations (Signet UK Finance plc); (iii) the Guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis; (iv) the non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis; (v) consolidating eliminations; and (vi) Signet Jewelers Limited and Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Each Guarantor subsidiary is 100% owned by the Parent Company at the date of each balance sheet presented. The Guarantor subsidiaries, along with Signet Jewelers Limited, will fully and unconditionally guarantee the obligations of Signet UK Finance plc under any such debt securities. Each entity in the consolidating financial information follows the same accounting policies as described in the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information has been presented on the equity method of accounting for all periods presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the subsidiaries’ cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and distributions, and other changes in equity. Elimination entries include consolidating and eliminating entries for investments in subsidiaries, and intercompanyintra-entity activity and balances.


29


Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

For the 13 week periodweeks ended August 1, 2015
(Unaudited)
(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Sales$
 $
 $1,391.3
 $19.3
 $
 $1,410.6
Cost of sales
 
 (914.2) (5.6) 
 (919.8)
Gross margin
 
 477.1
 13.7
 
 490.8
Selling, general and administrative expenses(0.9) 
 (444.9) (7.0) 
 (452.8)
Other operating income, net
 
 60.7
 2.1
 
 62.8
Operating (loss) income(0.9) 
 92.9
 8.8
 
 100.8
Intra-entity interest income (expense)
 4.7
 (47.0) 42.3
 
 
Interest expense, net
 (4.9) (3.4) (2.8) 
 (11.1)
(Loss) income before income taxes(0.9) (0.2) 42.5
 48.3
 
 89.7
Income taxes
 0.1
 (26.2) (1.4) 
 (27.5)
Equity in income of subsidiaries63.1
 
 24.7
 27.0
 (114.8) 
Net income (loss)$62.2
 $(0.1) $41.0
 $73.9
 $(114.8) $62.2

Condensed Consolidated Income Statement
For the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015
(Unaudited)
(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Sales$
 $
 $2,902.3
 $38.9
 $
 $2,941.2
Cost of sales
 
 (1,875.2) (9.3) 
 (1,884.5)
Gross margin
 
 1,027.1
 29.6
 
 1,056.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1.2) 
 (889.1) (15.7) 
 (906.0)
Other operating income, net
 
 124.2
 2.1
 
 126.3
Operating (loss) income(1.2) 
 262.2
 16.0
 
 277.0
Intra-entity interest income (expense)
 9.4
 (93.1) 83.7
 
 
Interest expense, net
 (9.8) (6.9) (5.4) 
 (22.1)
(Loss) income before income taxes(1.2) (0.4) 162.2
 94.3
 
 254.9
Income taxes
 0.1
 (74.7) 0.7
 
 (73.9)
Equity in income of subsidiaries182.2
 
 100.7
 104.2
 (387.1) 
Net income (loss)$181.0
 $(0.3) $188.2
 $199.2
 $(387.1) $181.0





30


Condensed Consolidated Income Statement
For the 13 weeks ended August 2, 2014

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

  $—     $—     $1,207.5   $18.4   $—    $1,225.9  

Cost of sales

   —      —      (811.4  (5.5  —      (816.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   —      —      396.1    12.9    —      409.0  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (0.4  —      (371.9  (6.9  —      (379.2

Other operating income, net

   —      —      54.0    (0.3)  —      53.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

   (0.4  —      78.2    5.7    —      83.5  

Intercompany interest income (expense)

   —      3.8    (34.8  31.0    —      —    

Interest expense, net

   —      (3.9)  (7.8  (2.0)  —      (13.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

   (0.4  (0.1)  35.6    34.7    —      69.8  

Income taxes

   —      —      (13.3  1.5    —      (11.8

Equity in income of subsidiaries

   58.4    —      31.9    25.8    (116.1  —��   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $58.0   $(0.1) $54.2   $62.0   $(116.1 $58.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Sales$
 $
 $1,207.5
 $18.4
 $
 $1,225.9
Cost of sales
 
 (811.4) (5.5) 
 (816.9)
Gross margin
 
 396.1
 12.9
 
 409.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses(0.4) 
 (371.9) (6.9) 
 (379.2)
Other operating income, net
 
 54.0
 (0.3) 
 53.7
Operating (loss) income(0.4) 
 78.2
 5.7
 
 83.5
Intra-entity interest (expense) income
 3.8
 (34.8) 31.0
 
 
Interest expense, net
 (3.9) (7.8) (2.0) 
 (13.7)
(Loss) income before income taxes(0.4) (0.1) 35.6
 34.7
 
 69.8
Income taxes
 
 (13.3) 1.5
 
 (11.8)
Equity in income of subsidiaries58.4
 
 31.9
 25.8
 (116.1) 
Net income (loss)$58.0
 $(0.1) $54.2
 $62.0
 $(116.1) $58.0

Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

For the 26 week periodweeks ended August 2, 2014

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

  $—     $—     $2,251.2   $30.8   $—     $2,282.0  

Cost of sales

   —      —      (1,459.0  (6.8  —      (1,465.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   —      —      792.2    24.0    —      816.2  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (0.8  —      (675.7  (13.2  —      (689.7

Other operating income, net

   —      —      106.0    1.7    —      107.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

   (0.8  —      222.5    12.5    —      234.2  

Intercompany interest income (expense)

   —      3.8    (41.8  38.0    —      —    

Interest expense, net

   —      (3.9)  (9.6  (2.0)  —      (15.5
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

   (0.8  (0.1)  171.1    48.5    —      218.7  

Income taxes

   —      —      (69.2  5.1    —      (64.1

Equity in income of subsidiaries

   155.4    —      123.1    106.6    (385.1  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $154.6   $(0.1) $225.0   $160.2   $(385.1 $154.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

For the 13 week period ended August 3, 2013

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

  $—     $—      $870.3   $9.9   $—     $880.2  

Cost of sales

   —      —       (570.2  (0.3  —      (570.5
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   —      —       300.1    9.6    —      309.7  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (0.7  —       (250.6  0.8    —      (250.5

Other operating income, net

   —      —       47.6    (1.3)  —      46.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

   (0.7  —       97.1    9.1    —      105.5  

Intercompany interest (expense) income

   —      —       (9.0  9.0    —      —    

Interest expense, net

   —      —       (1.0  —      —      (1.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

   (0.7  —       87.1    18.1    —      104.5  

Income taxes

   —      —       (33.1  (4.0)  —      (37.1

Equity in income of subsidiaries

   68.1    —       59.9    54.0    (182.0  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $67.4   $—      $113.9   $68.1   $(182.0 $67.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Income Statement

For the 26 week period ended August 3, 2013

(Unaudited)

  

  

  

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Sales

  $—     $—      $1,852.0   $21.8   $—     $1,873.8  

Cost of sales

   —      —       (1,179.5  (1.8  —      (1,181.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   —      —       672.5    20.0    —      692.5  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (1.1  —       (536.2  (0.2  —      (537.5

Other operating income, net

   —      —       95.0    (1.7)  —      93.3  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

   (1.1  —       231.3    18.1    —      248.3  

Intercompany interest (expense) income

   —      —       (17.1  17.1    —      —    

Interest expense, net

   —      —       (1.9  —      —      (1.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

   (1.1  —       212.3    35.2    —      246.4  

Income taxes

   —      —       (81.9  (5.3)  — ��    (87.2

Equity in income of subsidiaries

   160.3    —       143.6    130.0    (433.9  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $159.2   $—      $274.0   $159.9   $(433.9 $159.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Sales$
 $
 $2,251.2
 $30.8
 $
 $2,282.0
Cost of sales
 
 (1,459.0) (6.8) 
 (1,465.8)
Gross margin
 
 792.2
 24.0
 
 816.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses(0.8) 
 (675.7) (13.2) 
 (689.7)
Other operating income, net
 
 106.0
 1.7
 
 107.7
Operating (loss) income(0.8) 
 222.5
 12.5
 
 234.2
Intra-entity interest (expense) income
 3.8
 (41.8) 38.0
 
 
Interest expense, net
 (3.9) (9.6) (2.0) 
 (15.5)
(Loss) income before income taxes(0.8) (0.1) 171.1
 48.5
 
 218.7
Income taxes
 
 (69.2) 5.1
 
 (64.1)
Equity in income of subsidiaries155.4
 
 123.1
 106.6
 (385.1) 
Net income (loss)$154.6
 $(0.1) $225.0
 $160.2
 $(385.1) $154.6


31


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the 13 week periodweeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income

  $58.0   $(0.1) $54.2   $62.0   $(116.1 $58.0  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (2.3  —      (2.6)  0.4    2.2    (2.3)

Available-for-sale securities:

       

Unrealized loss

   (0.2  —      —      (0.2)  0.2    (0.2)

Cash flow hedges:

       

Unrealized loss

   (0.1  —      (0.1)  —      0.1    (0.1)

Reclassification adjustment for losses to net income

   3.4    —      3.4    —      (3.4  3.4  

Pension plan:

       

Actuarial gain

    —      —      —      (0.4  —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss

   0.4    —      0.4    —      —      0.4  

Prior service benefit

    —      —      —      —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits

   (0.4  —      (0.4  —      0.4    (0.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income

   0.8    —      0.7    0.2    (0.9)  0.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

  $58.8   $(0.1) $54.9   $62.2   $(117.0 $58.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the 26 week period ended August 2, 2014

(Unaudited)

  

  

  

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income

  $154.6   $(0.1) $225.0   $160.2   $(385.1 $154.6  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

       

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   7.3    —      8.3    (1.4  (6.9  7.3  

Available-for-sale securities:

       

Unrealized loss

   (0.2  —      —      (0.2)  0.2    (0.2)

Cash flow hedges:

       

Unrealized gain

   0.2    —      0.2    —      (0.2  0.2  

Reclassification adjustment for losses to net income

   8.1    —      8.1    —      (8.1  8.1  

Pension plan:

       

Actuarial gain

   —      —      —      —      —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss

   0.8    —      0.8    —      (0.8  0.8  

Prior service benefit

   —      —      —      —      —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits

   (0.7  —      (0.7  —      0.7    (0.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

   15.5    —      (16.7)  (1.6  (15.1  15.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

  $170.1   $(0.1) $241.7   $158.6   $(400.2 $170.1  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$62.2
 $(0.1) $41.0
 $73.9
 $(114.8) $62.2
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Foreign currency translation adjustments(4.7) 
 (1.5) (3.2) 4.7
 (4.7)
Available-for-sale securities:           
Unrealized loss(0.2) 
 
 (0.2) 0.2
 (0.2)
Cash flow hedges:           
Unrealized gain (loss)(5.5) 
 (5.5) 
 5.5
 (5.5)
Reclassification adjustment of losses to net income0.8
 
 0.8
 
 (0.8) 0.8
Pension plan:           
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss0.7
 
 0.7
 
 (0.7) 0.7
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits(0.5) 
 (0.5) 
 0.5
 (0.5)
Total other comprehensive income(9.4) 
 (6.0) (3.4) 9.4
 (9.4)
Total comprehensive income (loss)$52.8
 $(0.1) $35.0
 $70.5
 $(105.4) $52.8


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015

(Unaudited)
(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$181.0
 $(0.3) $188.2
 $199.2
 $(387.1) $181.0
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Foreign currency translation adjustments2.8
 
 6.0
 (3.2) (2.8) 2.8
Available-for-sale securities:           
Unrealized loss(0.3) 
 
 (0.3) 0.3
 (0.3)
Cash flow hedges:           
Unrealized gain (loss)(11.4) 
 (11.4) 
 11.4
 (11.4)
Reclassification adjustment of losses to net income1.3
 
 1.3
 
 (1.3) 1.3
Pension plan:           
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss1.4
 
 1.4
 
 (1.4) 1.4
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits(0.9) 
 (0.9) 
 0.9
 (0.9)
Total other comprehensive income(7.1) 
 (3.6) (3.5) 7.1
 (7.1)
Total comprehensive income (loss)$173.9
 $(0.3) $184.6
 $195.7
 $(380.0) $173.9


32


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the 13 week periodweeks ended August 3, 20132, 2014

(Unaudited)
(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$58.0
 $(0.1) $54.2
 $62.0
 $(116.1) $58.0
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Foreign currency translation adjustments(2.3) 
 (2.6) 0.4
 2.2
 (2.3)
Available-for-sale securities:           
Unrealized loss(0.2) 
 
 (0.2) 0.2
 (0.2)
Cash flow hedges:           
Unrealized gain(0.1) 
 (0.1) 
 0.1
 (0.1)
Reclassification adjustment of losses to net income3.4
 
 3.4
 
 (3.4) 3.4
Pension plan:           
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss0.4
 
 0.4
 
 (0.4) 0.4
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits(0.4) 
 (0.4) 
 0.4
 (0.4)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income0.8
 
 0.7
 0.2
 (0.9) 0.8
Total comprehensive income$58.8
 $(0.1) $54.9
 $62.2
 $(117.0) $58.8

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014
(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income

  $67.4   $—      $113.9   $68.1    $(182.0 $67.4  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

         

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (5.2  —       (5.9)  1.2     4.7    (5.2)

Cash flow hedges:

         

Unrealized loss

   (5.4  —       (5.4)  —       5.4    (5.4)

Reclassification adjustment for gains to net income

   (0.1  —       (0.1)  —       0.1    (0.1)

Pension plan:

         

Actuarial gain

   —      —       —      —       —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss

   0.4    —       0.4    —       (0.4  0.4  

Prior service benefit

   —      —       —      —       —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits

   (0.2  —       (0.2  —       0.2    (0.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

   (10.5  —       (11.2)  1.2     10.0    (10.5
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  $56.9   $—      $102.7   $69.3    $(172.0 $56.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the 26 week period ended August 3, 2013

(Unaudited)

  

  

  

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations  Consolidated 

Net income

  $159.2   $—      $274.0   $159.9    $(433.9 $159.2  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

         

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (7.0  —       (8.0)  1.6     6.4    (7.0)

Cash flow hedges:

         

Unrealized loss

   (16.8  —       (16.8)  —       16.8    (16.8)

Reclassification adjustment for gains to net income

   (0.7  —       (0.7)  —       0.7    (0.7)

Pension plan:

         

Actuarial gain

   —      —       —      —       —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss

   0.9    —       0.9    —       (0.9  0.9  

Prior service benefit

   —      —       —      —       —      —    

Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits

   (0.6  —       (0.6  —       0.6    (0.6
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

   (24.2  —       (25.2)  1.6     23.6    (24.2)
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  $135.0   $—      $248.8   $161.5    $(410.3 $135.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net income (loss)$154.6
 $(0.1) $225.0
 $160.2
 $(385.1) $154.6
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Foreign currency translation adjustments7.3
 
 8.3
 (1.4) (6.9) 7.3
Available-for-sale securities:           
Unrealized loss(0.2) 
 
 (0.2) 0.2
 (0.2)
Cash flow hedges:           
Unrealized gain0.2
 
 0.2
 
 (0.2) 0.2
Reclassification adjustment of losses to net income8.1
 
 8.1
 
 (8.1) 8.1
Pension plan:           
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of actuarial loss0.8
 
 0.8
 
 (0.8) 0.8
Reclassification adjustment to net income for amortization of prior service credits(0.7) 
 (0.7) 
 0.7
 (0.7)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income15.5
 
 16.7
 (1.6) (15.1) 15.5
Total comprehensive income$170.1
 $(0.1) $241.7
 $158.6
 $(400.2) $170.1


33


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

August 2, 2014

1, 2015

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
   Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Assets

          

Current assets:

          

Cash and cash equivalents

  $1.4    $—      $191.1    $22.5   $—     $215.0  

Accounts receivable, net

   —       —       1,306.9     9.1    —      1,316.0  

Intercompany receivables, net

   50.9     —       —       —      (50.9  —    

Other receivables

   —       —       52.3     1.8    —      54.1  

Other current assets

   0.1     0.7     115.2     4.5    —      120.5  

Deferred tax assets

   —       —       2.1     0.2    —      2.3  

Income taxes

   —       —       14.9     0.6    —      15.5  

Inventories

   —       —       2,287.0     58.3    —      2,345.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   52.4     0.7     3,969.5     97.0    (50.9  4,068.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets:

          

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —       —       621.6     6.2    —      627.8  

Goodwill

   —       —       548.3     3.6    —      551.9  

Intangible assets, net

   —       —       467.6     —      —      467.6  

Investment in subsidiaries

   2,646.2     —       546.8     435.8    (3,628.8  —    

Intercompany receivables, net

   —       403.9     —       3,330.0    (3,733.9  —    

Other assets

   —       6.1     100.4     26.5    —      133.0  

Deferred tax assets

   —       —       84.4     —      —      84.4  

Retirement benefit asset

   —       —       61.3     —      —      61.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $2,698.6    $410.7    $6,399.9    $3,899.1   $(7,413.6 $5,994.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity

          

Current liabilities:

          

Loans and overdrafts

  $—      $—      $31.2    $—     $—     $31.2  

Accounts payable

   —       —       234.7     0.3    —      235.0  

Intercompany payables, net

   —       —       19.7     31.2    (50.9  —    

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   14.7     5.0     392.4     10.0    —      422.1  

Deferred revenue

   —       —       211.1     —      —      211.1  

Deferred tax liabilities

   —       —       218.9     —      —      218.9  

Income taxes

   —       —       60.4     (5.0)  —      55.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   14.7     5.0     1,168.4     36.5    (50.9  1,173.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities:

          

Long-term debt

   —       398.4     380.7     600.0    —      1,379.1  

Intercompany payables, net

   —       —       3,733.9     —      (3,733.9  —    

Other liabilities

   —       —       226.9     8.5    —      235.4  

Deferred revenue

   —       —       520.4     —      —      520.4  

Deferred tax liabilities

   —       —       2.2     —      —      2.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   14.7     403.4     6,032.5     645.0    (3,784.8  3,310.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   2,683.9     7.3     367.4     3,254.1    (3,628.8  2,683.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $2,698.6    $410.7    $6,399.9    $3,899.1   $(7,413.6 $5,994.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Assets           
Current assets:           
Cash and cash equivalents$0.2
 $0.1
 $143.0
 $16.5
 $
 $159.8
Accounts receivable, net
 
 1,490.4
 2.8
 
 1,493.2
Intra-entity receivables, net10.0
 
 
 129.9
 (139.9) 
Other receivables
 
 45.1
 10.1
 
 55.2
Other current assets0.1
 0.7
 120.7
 5.3
 
 126.8
Deferred tax assets
 
 3.9
 0.4
 
 4.3
Income taxes
 
 3.0
 
 
 3.0
Inventories
 
 2,318.9
 95.3
 
 2,414.2
Total current assets10.3
 0.8
 4,125.0
 260.3
 (139.9) 4,256.5
Non-current assets:           
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
 679.5
 5.6
 
 685.1
Goodwill
 
 514.0
 3.6
 
 517.6
Intangible assets, net
 
 437.8
 
 
 437.8
Investment in subsidiaries2,879.9
 
 554.9
 535.9
 (3,970.7) 
Intra-entity receivables, net
 402.5
 
 3,479.9
 (3,882.4) 
Other assets
 5.5
 113.2
 26.7
 
 145.4
Deferred tax assets
 
 128.9
 0.1
 
 129.0
Retirement benefit asset
 
 40.4
 
 
 40.4
Total assets$2,890.2
 $408.8
 $6,593.7
 $4,312.1
 $(7,993.0) $6,211.8
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity           
Current liabilities:           
Loans and overdrafts$
 $
 $82.0
 $
 $
 $82.0
Accounts payable
 
 187.5
 6.5
 
 194.0
Intra-entity payables, net
 
 139.9
 
 (139.9) 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities18.0
 2.4
 422.2
 10.5
 
 453.1
Deferred revenue
 
 230.2
 
 
 230.2
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 172.4
 
 
 172.4
Income taxes
 (0.1) 6.5
 (0.6) 
 5.8
Total current liabilities18.0
 2.3
 1,240.7
 16.4
 (139.9) 1,137.5
Non-current liabilities:           
Long-term debt
 398.5
 350.2
 600.0
 
 1,348.7
Intra-entity payables, net
 
 3,882.4
 
 (3,882.4) 
Other liabilities
 
 218.7
 7.5
 
 226.2
Deferred revenue
 
 607.0
 
 
 607.0
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 20.2
 
 
 20.2
Total liabilities18.0
 400.8
 6,319.2
 623.9
 (4,022.3) 3,339.6
Total shareholders’ equity2,872.2
 8.0
 274.5
 3,688.2
 (3,970.7) 2,872.2
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$2,890.2
 $408.8
 $6,593.7
 $4,312.1
 $(7,993.0) $6,211.8

34


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
January 31, 2015

February 1, 2014

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
   Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations  Consolidated 

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $1.4    $—      $237.0    $9.2    $—     $247.6  

Accounts receivable, net

   —       —       1,361.3     12.7     —      1,374.0  

Intercompany receivables, net

   47.7     —       —       238.0     (285.7  —    

Other receivables

   —       —       51.1     0.4     —      51.5  

Other current assets

   —       —       86.5     0.5     —      87.0  

Deferred tax assets

   —       —       2.8     0.2     —      3.0  

Income taxes

   —       —       6.0     0.5     —      6.5  

Inventories

   —       —       1,434.5     53.5     —      1,488.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   49.1     —       3,179.2     315.0     (285.7  3,257.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets:

        

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —       —       481.5     6.1     —      487.6  

Investment in subsidiaries

   2,526.3     —       1,452.8     1,143.2     (5,122.3  —    

Intercompany receivables, net

   —       —       —       1,098.0     (1,098.0  —    

Other assets

   —       —       110.4     3.6     —      114.0  

Deferred tax assets

   —       —       113.6     0.1     —      113.7  

Retirement benefit asset

   —       —       56.3     —       —      56.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $2,575.4    $—      $5,393.8    $2,566.0    $(6,506.0 $4,029.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity

        

Current liabilities:

        

Loans and overdrafts

  $—      $—      $19.3    $—      $—     $19.3  

Accounts payable

   —       —       160.5     2.4     —      162.9  

Intercompany payables, net

   —       —       285.7     —       (285.7  —    

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   12.3     —       313.1     3.1     —      328.5  

Deferred revenue

   —       —       173.0     —       —      173.0  

Deferred tax liabilities

   —       —       113.1     —       —      113.1  

Income taxes

   —       —       101.3     2.6     —      103.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   12.3     —       1,166.0     8.1     (285.7  900.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities:

        

Long-term debt

   —       —       —       —       —      —    

Intercompany payables, net

   —       —       1,098.0     —       (1,098.0  —    

Other liabilities

   —       —       118.5     3.2     —      121.7  

Deferred revenue

   —       —       443.7     —       —      443.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   12.3     —       2,826.2     11.3     (1,383.7  1,466.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   2,563.1     —       2,567.6     2,554.7     (5,122.3  2,563.1  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $2,575.4    $—      $5,393.8    $2,566.0    $(6,506.0 $4,029.2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Assets           
Current assets:           
Cash and cash equivalents$2.1
 $0.1
 $166.5
 $24.9
 $
 $193.6
Accounts receivable, net
 
 1,566.2
 1.4
 
 1,567.6
Intra-entity receivables, net121.6
 
 
 61.8
 (183.4) 
Other receivables
 
 53.9
 9.7
 
 63.6
Other current assets0.1
 0.7
 130.9
 5.5
 
 137.2
Deferred tax assets
 
 4.3
 0.2
 
 4.5
Income taxes
 
 1.8
 
 
 1.8
Inventories
 
 2,376.6
 62.4
 
 2,439.0
Total current assets123.8
 0.8
 4,300.2
 165.9
 (183.4) 4,407.3
Non-current assets:           
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
 660.2
 5.7
 
 665.9
Goodwill
 
 515.6
 3.6
 
 519.2
Intangible assets
 
 447.1
 
 
 447.1
Investment in subsidiaries2,701.3
 
 462.8
 421.7
 (3,585.8) 
Intra-entity receivables, net
 402.4
 
 3,490.0
 (3,892.4) 
Other assets
 5.8
 105.3
 28.9
 
 140.0
Deferred tax assets
 
 111.0
 0.1
 
 111.1
Retirement benefit asset
 
 37.0
 
 
 37.0
Total assets$2,825.1
 $409.0
 $6,639.2
 $4,115.9
 $(7,661.6) $6,327.6
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity           
Current liabilities:           
Loans and overdrafts$
 $
 $97.5
 $
 $
 $97.5
Accounts payable
 
 273.4
 4.3
 
 277.7
Intra-entity payables, net
 
 183.4
 
 (183.4) 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities14.7
 2.4
 456.7
 8.6
 
 482.4
Deferred revenue
 
 248.0
 
 
 248.0
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 145.8
 
 
 145.8
Income taxes
 (0.2) 87.7
 (0.6) 
 86.9
Total current liabilities14.7
 2.2
 1,492.5
 12.3
 (183.4) 1,338.3
Non-current liabilities:           
Long-term debt
 398.5
 365.3
 600.0
 
 1,363.8
Intra-entity payables, net
 
 3,892.4
 
 (3,892.4) 
Other liabilities
 
 222.0
 8.2
 
 230.2
Deferred revenue
 
 563.9
 
 
 563.9
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 21.0
 
 
 21.0
Total liabilities14.7
 400.7
 6,557.1
 620.5
 (4,075.8) 3,517.2
Total shareholders’ equity2,810.4
 8.3
 82.1
 3,495.4
 (3,585.8) 2,810.4
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$2,825.1
 $409.0
 $6,639.2
 $4,115.9
 $(7,661.6) $6,327.6



35


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

August 3, 2013

2, 2014

(Unaudited)

(in millions)  Signet
Jewelers
Limited
   Signet UK
Finance  plc
   Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   Eliminations  Consolidated 

Assets

           

Current assets:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

  $0.9    $—     $203.1    $8.9    $—     $212.9  

Accounts receivable, net

   —       —       1,144.1     8.0     —      1,152.1  

Intercompany receivables, net

   48.1     —       —       725.0     (773.1  —    

Other receivables

   —       —       42.6     0.4     —      43.0  

Other current assets

   0.1     —       79.0     0.1     —      79.2  

Deferred tax assets

   —       —       2.0     0.3     —      2.3  

Income taxes

   —       —       12.8     —       —      12.8  

Inventories

   —       —       1,367.5     50.2     —      1,417.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   49.1     —       2,851.1     792.9     (773.1  2,920.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current assets:

           

Property, plant and equipment, net

   —       —       434.1     0.8     —      434.9  

Investment in subsidiaries

   2,335.7     —       1,455.2     1,157.5     (4,948.4  —    

Intercompany receivables, net

   —       —       —       600.0     (600.0  —    

Other assets

   —       —       107.4     —       —      107.4  

Deferred tax assets

   —       —       127.3     —       —      127.3  

Retirement benefit asset

   —       —       50.7     —       —      50.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $2,384.8    $—      $5,025.8    $2,551.2    $(6,321.5 $3,640.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity

           

Current liabilities:

           

Loans and overdrafts

  $—      $—      $1.7    $—      $—     $1.7  

Accounts payable

   —       —       129.6     0.7     —      130.3  

Intercompany payables, net

   —       —       773.1     —       (773.1  —    

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   12.2     —       245.4     2.1     —      259.7  

Deferred revenue

   —       —       154.6     —       —      154.6  

Deferred tax liabilities

   —       —       140.8     —       —      140.8  

Income taxes

   —       —       45.2     1.7     —      46.9  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   12.2     —       1,490.4     4.5     (773.1  734.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities:

           

Intercompany payables, net

   —       —       600.0     —       (600.0  —    

Deferred tax liabilities

   —       —       0.7     —       —      0.7  

Other liabilities

   —       —       109.9     4.7     —      114.6  

Deferred revenue

   —       —       418.4     —       —      418.4  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   12.2     —       2,619.4     9.2     (1,373.1  1,267.7  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   2,372.6     —       2,406.4     2,542.0     (4,948.4  2,372.6  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $2,384.8    $—      $5,025.8    $2,551.2    $(6,321.5 $3,640.3  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Assets       
Current assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$1.4
 $
 $191.1
 $22.5
 $
 $215.0
Accounts receivable, net
 
 1,306.9
 9.1
 
 1,316.0
Intra-entity receivables, net50.9
 
 
 
 (50.9) 
Other receivables
 
 52.3
 1.8
 
 54.1
Other current assets0.1
 0.7
 115.2
 4.5
 
 120.5
Deferred tax assets
 
 2.1
 0.2
 
 2.3
Income taxes
 
 14.9
 0.6
 
 15.5
Inventories
 
 2,287.0
 58.3
 
 2,345.3
Total current assets52.4
 0.7
 3,969.5
 97.0
 (50.9) 4,068.7
Non-current assets:           
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
 621.6
 6.2
 
 627.8
Goodwill
 
 548.3
 3.6
 
 551.9
Intangible assets, net0.0
 
 467.6
 
 
 467.6
Investment in subsidiaries2,646.2
 
 546.8
 435.8
 (3,628.8) 
Intra-entity receivables, net
 403.9
 
 3,330.0
 (3,733.9) 
Other assets
 6.1
 100.4
 26.5
 
 133.0
Deferred tax assets
 
 84.4
 
 
 84.4
Retirement benefit asset
 
 61.3
 
 
 61.3
Total assets$2,698.6
 $410.7
 $6,399.9
 $3,899.1
 $(7,413.6) $5,994.7
Liabilities and Shareholders’ equity       
Current liabilities:           
Loans and overdrafts$
 $
 $31.2
 $
 $
 $31.2
Accounts payable
 
 234.7
 0.3
 
 235.0
Intra-entity payables, net
 
 19.7
 31.2
 (50.9) 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities14.7
 5.0
 392.4
 10.0
 
 422.1
Deferred revenue
 
 211.1
 
 
 211.1
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 218.9
 
 
 218.9
Income taxes
 
 60.4
 (5.0) 
 55.4
Total current liabilities14.7
 5.0
 1,168.4
 36.5
 (50.9) 1,173.7
Non-current liabilities:           
Long-term debt
 398.4
 380.7
 600.0
 
 1,379.1
Deferred tax liabilities
 
 2.2
 
 
 2.2
Intra-entity payables, net
 
 3,733.9
 
 (3,733.9) 
Other liabilities
 
 226.9
 8.5
 
 235.4
Deferred revenue
 
 520.4
 
 
 520.4
Total liabilities14.7
 403.4
 6,032.5
 645.0
 (3,784.8) 3,310.8
Total shareholders’ equity2,683.9
 7.3
 367.4
 3,254.1
 (3,628.8) 2,683.9
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$2,698.6
 $410.7
 $6,399.9
 $3,899.1
 $(7,413.6) $5,994.7


36


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the 13 week periodweeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015

(Unaudited)

(in millions) Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Other cash provided by operating activities

 $49.6   $3.8   $76.9   $30.1   $(50.0) $110.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  49.6    3.8    76.9    30.1    (50.0)  110.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

      

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  —      —      (61.8  (0.1  —      (61.9

Investment in subsidiaries

  —      —      (7.4  —      7.4    —    

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

  —      —      —      (1.2  —      (1.2

Proceeds from available-for-sale securities

  —      —      —      1.0    —      1.0  

Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired

  —      —      (1,431.1)  1.9    —      (1,429.2)
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

  —      —      (1,500.3  1.6    7.4    (1,491.3
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

      

Dividends paid

  (14.4  —      —      —      —      (14.4

Intercompany dividends paid

  —      —      (850.2)  0.2    850.0    —    

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

  1.0    7.4    —      800.0    (807.4)  1.0  

Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards

  —      —      —      —      —      —    

Proceeds from long-term debt

  —      398.4    400.0    600.0    —      1,398.4  

Payment of debt issuance costs

  —      (5.7)  (7.4)  (2.3)  —      (15.4)

Repurchase of common shares

  (11.0)  —      —      —      —      (11.0)

Net settlement of equity based awards

  0.2    —      —      —      —      0.2  

Capital lease payments

  —      —      (0.2)  —      —      (0.2

Repayment of short-term borrowings

  —      —      (11.7)  —      —      (11.7

Intercompany activity, net

  (25.7)  (403.9)  1,857.9    (1,428.3  —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

  (49.9)  (3.8)  1,388.4    (30.4  42.6    1,346.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  1.7    —      226.7    20.7    —      249.1  

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (0.3  —      (35.0  1.3    —      (34.0)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  —      —      (0.6)  0.5    —      (0.1
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $1.4   $—     $191.1   $22.5   $—     $215.0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$2.5
 $(4.7) $102.8
 $43.0
 $
 $143.6
Investing activities           
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
 (55.7) (0.3) 
 (56.0)
Investment in subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
 
 
 (0.5) 
 (0.5)
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
 
 
 0.1
 
 0.1
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
 (55.7) (0.7) 
 (56.4)
Financing activities           
Dividends paid(17.7) 
 
 
 
 (17.7)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares0.1
 
 
 
 
 0.1
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt
 
 
 558.1
 
 558.1
Repayments of long-term debt
 
 (5.0) (558.1) 
 (563.1)
Repurchase of common shares(62.8) 
 
 
 
 (62.8)
Net settlement of equity based awards0.4
 
 
 
 
 0.4
Capital lease payments
 
 (0.3) 
 
 (0.3)
Proceeds from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
 
 35.0
 
 
 35.0
Intra-entity activity, net76.8
 4.7
 (44.3) (37.2) 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(3.2) 4.7
 (14.6) (37.2) 
 (50.3)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period0.9
 0.1
 110.4
 11.2
 
 122.6
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(0.7) 
 32.5
 5.1
 
 36.9
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 0.1
 0.2
 
 0.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$0.2
 $0.1
 $143.0
 $16.5
 $
 $159.8

37


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the 26 week periodweeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015

(Unaudited)

(in millions) Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Other cash provided by operating activities

 $49.1   $3.8   $139.3   $41.7   $(50.0) $183.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  49.1    3.8    139.3    41.7    (50.0)  183.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

      

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  —      —      (89.6  (0.4  —      (90.0

Investment in subsidiaries

  —      —      (7.4  —      7.4    —    

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

  —      —      —      (1.2  —      (1.2

Proceeds from available-for-sale securities

  —      —      —      1.0    —      1.0  

Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired

  —      —      (1,431.1)  1.9    —      (1,429.2)
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

  —      —      (1,528.1  1.3    7.4    (1,519.4
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

      

Dividends paid

  (26.4  —      —      —      —      (26.4

Intercompany dividends paid

  —      —      (849.1)  (0.9)  850.0    —    

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

  2.0    7.4    —      800.0    (807.4)  2.0  

Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards

  —      —      7.7    —      —      7.7  

Proceeds from long-term debt

  —      398.4    400.0    600.0    —      1,398.4  

Payment of debt issuance costs

  —      (5.7)  (10.4)  (2.3)  —      (18.4)

Repurchase of common shares

  (22.4)  —      —      —      —      (22.4)

Net settlement of equity based awards

  (15.1)  —      —      —      —      (15.1)

Capital lease payments

  —      —      (0.2)  —      —      (0.2

Repayment of short-term borrowings

  —      —      (22.2)  —      —      (22.2

Intercompany activity, net

  12.8    (403.9)  1,815.5    (1,424.4  —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

  (49.1)  (3.8)  1,341.3    (27.6  42.6    1,303.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  1.4    —      237.0    9.2    —      247.6  

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  —      —      (47.5  15.4    —      (32.1)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  —      —      1.6    (2.1  —      (0.5
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $1.4   $—     $191.1   $22.5   $—     $215.0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$(0.9) $0.2
 $157.2
 $54.1
 $
 $210.6
Investing activities           
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
 (98.6) (0.3) 
 (98.9)
Investment in subsidiaries
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
 
 
 (1.9) 
 (1.9)
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
 
 
 3.6
 
 3.6
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
 (98.6) 1.4
 
 (97.2)
Financing activities           
Dividends paid(32.1) 
 
 
 
 (32.1)
Intra-entity dividends paid
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of common shares0.2
 
 
 
 
 0.2
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
 
 5.1
 
 
 5.1
Proceeds from long-term debt
 
 
 1,196.3
 
 1,196.3
Repayments of long-term debt
 
 (10.0) (1,196.3) 
 (1,206.3)
Payment of debt issuance costs
 
 
 
 
 
Repurchase of common shares(81.9) 
 
 
 
 (81.9)
Net settlement of equity based awards(8.3) 
 
 
 
 (8.3)
Capital lease payments
 
 (0.6) 
 
 (0.6)
Proceeds from (repayment of) short-term borrowings
 
 (20.0) 
 
 (20.0)
Intra-entity activity, net121.1
 (0.2) (56.8) (64.1) 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1.0) (0.2) (82.3) (64.1) 
 (147.6)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period2.1
 0.1
 166.5
 24.9
 
 193.6
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(1.9) 
 (23.7) (8.6) 
 (34.2)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 0.2
 0.2
 
 0.4
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$0.2
 $0.1
 $143.0
 $16.5
 $
 $159.8


38


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the 13 week periodweeks ended August 3, 20132, 2014

(Unaudited)

(in millions) Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Other cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 $49.4   $—     $14.1   $(0.1) $(50.0) $13.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  49.4    —      14.1    (0.1)  (50.0)  13.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

      

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  —      —      (30.2  (0.2  —      (30.4

Investment in subsidiaries

  (0.3)  —      —      —      0.3    —    

Acquisition of Ultra Stores, Inc.

  —      —      1.4    —      —      1.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (0.3)  —      (28.8  (0.2  0.3    (29.0
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

      

Dividends paid

  (12.1  —      —      —      —      (12.1

Intercompany dividends paid

  —      —      (43.7)  (6.3  50.0    —    

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

  0.2    —      0.3    —      (0.3)  0.2  

Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards

  —      —      4.5    —      —      4.5  

Repurchase of common shares

  (25.0  —      —      —      —      (25.0

Net settlement of equity based awards

  0.1    —      —      —      —      0.1  

Repayment of short-term borrowings

  —      —      (4.0  —      —      (4.0

Intercompany activity, net

  (20.8)  —      36.1    (15.3)  —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (57.6)  —      (6.8  (21.6)  49.7    (36.3
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  9.4    —      225.0    29.3    —      263.7  

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

  (8.5)  —      (21.5  (21.9)  —      (51.9)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  —      —      (0.4)  1.5    —      1.1  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $0.9   $—     $203.1   $8.9   $—     $212.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities$49.6
 $3.8
 $76.9
 $30.1
 $(50.0) $110.4
Investing activities

 
 

 

 

 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
 (61.8) (0.1) 
 (61.9)
Investment in subsidiaries$
 $
 $(7.4) $0.0
 $7.4
 $0.0
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
 
 
 (1.2) 
 (1.2)
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
 
 
 1.0
 
 1.0
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
 
 (1,431.1) 1.9
 
 (1,429.2)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
 (1,500.3) 1.6
 7.4
 (1,491.3)
Financing activities

 
 

 

 

 

Dividends paid(14.4) 
 
 
 
 (14.4)
Intra-entity dividends paid
 
 (850.2) 0.2
 850.0
 
Proceeds from issuance of common shares1.0
 7.4
 
 800.0
 (807.4) 1.0
Repurchase of common shares(11.0) 
 0.0
 
 
 (11.0)
Net settlement of equity based awards0.2
 
 
 
 
 0.2
Proceeds from long-term debt
 398.4
 400.0
 600.0
 
 1,398.4
Payment of debt issuance costs
 (5.7) (7.4) (2.3) 
 (15.4)
Capital lease payments
 
 (0.2) 
 
 (0.2)
Repayment of short-term borrowings
 
 (11.7) 
 
 (11.7)
Intra-entity activity, net(25.7) (403.9) 1,857.9
 (1,428.3) 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(49.9) (3.8) 1,388.4
 (30.4) 42.6
 1,346.9
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1.7
 
 226.7
 20.7
 
 249.1
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(0.3) 
 (35.0) 1.3
 
 (34.0)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 (0.6) 0.5
 
 (0.1)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1.4
 $
 $191.1
 $22.5
 $
 $215.0


39


Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the 26 week periodweeks ended August 3, 20132, 2014

(Unaudited)

(in millions) Signet
Jewelers
Limited
  Signet UK
Finance  plc
  Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
  Eliminations  Consolidated 

Cash flows from operating activities

      

Other cash provided by operating activities

 $88.9   $—     $45.2   $14.4   $(90.0 $58.5  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  88.9    —      45.2    14.4    (90.0)  58.5  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities

      

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  —      —      (53.4  (0.2  —      (53.6

Investment in subsidiaries

  (0.3)  —      —      —      0.3    —    

Acquisition of Ultra Stores, Inc.

  —      —      1.4    —      —      1.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (0.3)  —      (52.0  (0.2  0.3    (52.2
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities

      

Dividends paid

  (21.9  —      —      —      —      (21.9

Intercompany dividends paid

  —      —      (77.0)  (13.0  90.0    —    

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

  5.2    —      0.3    —      (0.3)  5.2  

Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards

  —      —      4.5    —      —      4.5  

Repurchase of common shares

  (75.1  —      —      —      —      (75.1

Net settlement of equity based awards

  (9.0  —      —      —      —      (9.0

Proceeds from short-term borrowings

  —      —      1.7    —      —      1.7  

Intercompany activity, net

  (0.3)  —      10.9    (10.6)  —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (101.1)  —      (59.6  (23.6)  89.7    (94.6
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  13.4    —      271.3    16.3    —      301.0  

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

  (12.5)  —      (66.4  (9.4)  —      (88.3)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  —      —      (1.8)  2.0    —      0.2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $0.9   $—     $203.1   $8.9   $—     $212.9  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(in millions)Signet
Jewelers
Limited
 Signet UK
Finance  plc
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminations Consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities$49.1
 $3.8
 $139.3
 $41.7
 $(50.0) $183.9
Investing activities
  
 
 
  
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
 (89.6) (0.4) 
 (90.0)
Investment in subsidiaries
 
 (7.4) 
 7.4
 
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
 
 
 (1.2) 
 (1.2)
Proceeds from available-for-sale securities
 
 
 1.0
 
 1.0
Acquisition of Zale Corporation, net of cash acquired
 
 (1,431.1) 1.9
 
 (1,429.2)
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities
 
 (1,528.1) 1.3
 7.4
 (1,519.4)
Financing activities           
Dividends paid(26.4) 
 
 
 
 (26.4)
Intra-entity dividends paid
 
 (849.1) (0.9) 850.0
 
Proceeds from issuance of common shares2.0
 7.4
 
 800.0
 (807.4) 2.0
Excess tax benefit from exercise of share awards
 
 7.7
 
 
 7.7
Repurchase of common shares(22.4) 
 
 
 
 (22.4)
Net settlement of equity based awards(15.1) 
 
 
 
 (15.1)
Proceeds from long-term debt
 398.4
 400.0
 600.0
 
 1,398.4
Payment of debt issuance costs
 (5.7) (10.4) (2.3) 
 (18.4)
Capital lease payments
 
 (0.2) 
 
 (0.2)
Repayment of short-term borrowings
 
 (22.2) 
 
 (22.2)
Intra-entity activity, net12.8
 (403.9) 1,815.5
 (1,424.4) 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(49.1) (3.8) 1,341.3
 (27.6) 42.6
 1,303.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1.4
 
 237.0
 9.2
 
 247.6
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
 (47.5) 15.4
 
 (32.1)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
 1.6
 (2.1) 
 (0.5)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1.4
 $
 $191.1
 $22.5
 $
 $215.0



40


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements which are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, based upon management’s beliefs and expectations as well as on assumptions made by and data currently available to management, appear in a number of places throughout this document and include statements regarding, among other things, Signet’s results of operation, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which Signet operates. The use of the words “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “believes,” “should,” “potential,” “may,” “forecast,” “objective,” “plan,” or “target,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to general economic conditions, risks relating to Signet being a Bermuda corporation,decline in consumer spending, the merchandising, pricing and inventory policies followed by Signet, the reputation of Signet and its brands, the level of competition in the jewelry sector, the cost and availability of diamonds, gold and other precious metals, regulations relating to customer credit, seasonality of Signet’s business, financial market risks, deterioration in customers’ financial condition, exchange rate fluctuations, changes in Signet's credit rating, changes in consumer attitudes regarding jewelry, management of social, ethical and environmental risks, security breaches and other disruptions to Signet’s information technology infrastructure and databases, inadequacy in and disruptions to internal controls and systems, changes in assumptions used in making accounting estimates relating to items such as extended service plans and pensions, risks related to Signet being a Bermuda corporation, the impact of the acquisition of Zale Corporation on relationships, including with employees, suppliers, customers and competitors, the impact of stockholder litigation with respect to the acquisition of Zale Corporation, and our ability to successfully integrate Zale Corporation’sCorporation's operations and to realize synergies from the transaction.

For a discussion of these risks and other risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-lookingforward looking statement, see the “Risk Factors”"Risk Factors" section of Signet’sSignet's Fiscal 20142015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 201426, 2015 and Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. Signet undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.

OVERVIEW

Signet Jewelers Limited ("Signet" or the "Company") is the world's largest retailer of diamond jewelry. Signet is incorporated in Bermuda and its address and telephone number are shown on the largest specialty retail jeweler by sales incover of this document. Its corporate website is www.signetjewelers.com, from where documents that the Company is required to file or furnish with the US CanadaSecurities and UK. SignetExchange Commission (“SEC”) may be viewed or downloaded free of charge.
On May 29, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Zale Corporation (the "Zale Acquisition" or "Acquisition") for $1,458.0 million, including $478.2 million to extinguish Zale Corporation’s existing debt. The Acquisition was funded by the Company through existing cash and the issuance of $1,400.0 million of long-term debt. The Acquisition aligns with each strategic pillar of the Company’s Vision 2020. See Notes 3 and 17 of Item 1 for additional information related to the Acquisition and the issuance of long-term debt to finance the transaction, respectively.
The Company manages its business as four reportable segments, the Sterling Jewelers division, the UK Jewelry division and the Zale division,by store brand grouping, a description of which consists of the Zale Jewelry and the Piercing Pagoda segments. In addition, the Other operating segment consists of all non-reportable segments, including subsidiaries involved in the purchasing and conversion of rough diamonds to polished stones.

follows:

The Sterling Jewelers division is one reportable segment. It operated 1,4871,530 stores in all 50 states at August 2, 2014.1, 2015. Its stores tradeoperate nationally in malls and off-mall locations principally as Kay Jewelers (“Kay”), and regionally under a number of well-established mall-based brands. Destination superstores trade nationwide as Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry (“Jared”).

The division also operates a variety of mall-based regional brands.

The Zale division operated 998 fine jewelry (“Zale Jewelry”) stores and 611 kiosks (“Piercing Pagoda”) at August 2, 2014, located primarily in shopping malls throughout the US, Canada and Puerto Rico. Zale Jewelry includes national brands Zales Jewelers, Zales Outlet and Peoples Jewellers, along with regional brands Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins Jewellers. Piercing Pagoda operates through mall-based kiosks.

consists of two reportable segments:

Zale Jewelry, which operated 966 jewelry stores at August 1, 2015, is located primarily in shopping malls in North America. Zale Jewelry includes the US store brand Zales and the Canada store brand Peoples Jewellers. The division also operates regional brands Gordon’s Jewelers and Mappins Jewellers.
Piercing Pagoda, which operated 599 mall-based kiosks at August 1, 2015, is located in shopping malls in the US and Puerto Rico.
The UK Jewelry division is one reportable segment. It operated 493498 stores at August 2, 2014, including 14 stores in the Republic of Ireland and three in the Channel Islands.1, 2015. Its stores tradeoperate in major regional shopping malls and prime ‘High Street’ locations (main shopping thoroughfaresoff-mall (i.e. high street) principally as H.Samuel and Ernest Jones.
Certain company activities (e.g. diamond sourcing) are managed as a separate operating segment and are aggregated with high pedestrian traffic) as “H.Samuel,” “Ernest Jones,” and “Leslie Davis.”

In addition, on November 4, 2013, Signet acquired aunallocated corporate administrative functions in the segment "Other" for financial reporting purposes. Our diamond sourcing function includes our diamond polishing factory in Gaborone, Botswana. This acquisition expanded Signet’s long-term diamond sourcing capabilities and provides resourcesSee Note 4 of Item 1 for Signet to cut and polish stones.

additional information regarding the Company's operating segments.


41


Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources

The comparability of the Company’s operating results for the 13 and 26 week periodsweeks ended August 2, 20141, 2015 and August 3, 20132, 2014 presented herein has been affected by certain transactions, including:

The Zale Acquisition that closed on May 29, 2014, as described in Note 203 of Item 1 resulting in 26 incremental days of Zale operations in the second quarter of Fiscal 2016 compared to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements;

second quarter of Fiscal 2015;

Certain acquisition relatedtransaction-related costs;

Zale Acquisition financing as described in Notes 19Note 3 and 20;

Note 17 of Item 1, including global financing arrangements; and

Certain non-recurring purchase accounting costs.

adjustments.

Non-GAAP measures

Signet provides certain non-GAAP information in reporting its financial results to give investors additional data to evaluate its operations. Management does not, nor does it suggest investors should, consider such non-GAAP measures in isolation from, or in substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

The following discussion of results of operations highlights, as necessary, the significant changes in operating results arising from these items and transactions. However, unusual items or transactions may occur in any period. Accordingly, investors and other financial statement users individually should consider the types of events and transactions that have affected operating trends.

Exchange translation impact

Signet has historically used constant exchange rates to compare period-to-period changes in certain financial data. Management considers this a useful measure for analyzing and explaining changes and trends in Signet’s results. The impact of the re-calculation, including a reconciliation to Signet’s US GAAP results, is analyzed below.

  13 weeks ended  Change %  Impact  of
exchange
rate
movement
  13 weeks
ended
August 3, 2013
at constant
exchange  rates
(non-GAAP)
  Change  at
constant
exchange
rates
(non-
GAAP)

%
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)       August 2,      
2014(1)
        August 3,      
2013
             

Sales by division:

      

Sterling Jewelers division

 $810.4   $741.1    9.4   $—     $741.1    9.4  

UK Jewelry division

  162.9    139.1    17.1    15.1    154.2    5.6  

Zale division

  247.5    —      —      —      —      —    

Other

  5.1    —      —      —      —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales

  1,225.9    880.2    39.3    15.1    895.3    36.9  

Cost of sales

  (816.9  (570.5  (43.2  (11.1  (581.6  (40.5
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

  409.0    309.7    32.1    4.0    313.7    30.4  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  (379.2)  (250.5  (51.4  (4.0  (254.5  (49.0

Other operating income, net

  53.7    46.3    16.0    —      46.3    16.0  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

      

Sterling Jewelers division

  129.9    111.9    16.1    —      111.9    16.1  

UK Jewelry division

  1.1    (0.8  237.5    —      (0.8  237.5  

Zale division

  (9.8  —      —      —      —      —    

Other(2)

  (37.7)  (5.6  (573.2  —      (5.6  (573.2
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income

  83.5    105.5    (20.9  —      105.5    (20.9

Interest expense, net

  (13.7)  (1.0  nm    0.1    (0.9  nm  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

  69.8    104.5    (33.2  0.1    104.6    (33.3

Income taxes

  (11.8)  (37.1  68.2    (0.3  (37.4  68.4  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 $58.0   $67.4    (13.9 $(0.2 $67.2    (13.7
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic

 $0.73  $0.84    (13.1 $—     $0.84    (13.1

Earnings per share – diluted

 $0.72  $0.84    (14.3 $(0.01 $0.83    (13.3

(1)Includes the 65-day results of Zale’s from acquisition date to end of second quarter.
(2)Other includes $30.8 million of one-time transaction and severance related costs.
nmNot meaningful.

  26 weeks ended  Change %  Impact of
exchange
rate
movement
  26 weeks
ended
August 3, 2013
at constant
exchange rates
(non-GAAP)
  Change at
constant
exchange
rates
(non-
GAAP)
%
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)       August 2,      
2014(1)
        August 3,      
2013
             

Sales by division:

      

Sterling Jewelers division

 $1,713.9  $1,598.3   7.2   $—     $1,598.3   7.2  

UK Jewelry division

  314.6   274.1   14.8    27.1    301.2    4.4  

Zale division

  247.5    —      —      —      —      —    

Other

  6.0    1.4   328.6    —      1.4   328.6  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total sales

  2,282.0   1,873.8   21.8    27.1    1,900.9    20.0  

Cost of sales

  (1,465.8)  (1,181.3  (24.1  (20.0  (1,201.3  (22.0
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

  816.2   692.5   17.9    7.1    699.6    16.7  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  (689.7)  (537.5  (28.3  (7.6  (545.1  (26.5

Other operating income, net

  107.7   93.3   15.4    0.1    93.4    15.3  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss):

      

Sterling Jewelers division

  296.2   264.7   11.9    —      264.7   11.9  

UK Jewelry division

  1.1   (4.9  122.4    (0.4  (5.3  120.8  

Zale division

  (9.8)  —      —      —      —      —    

Other(2)

  (53.3)  (11.5  (363.5  —      (11.5)  (363.5
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income

  234.2   248.3   (5.7  (0.4  247.9    (5.5

Interest expense, net

  (15.5)  (1.9  (715.8  —      (1.9)  (715.8
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

  218.7   246.4   (11.2  (0.4  246.0    (11.1

Income taxes

  (64.1)  (87.2  26.5    —      (87.2)  26.5  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

 $154.6  $159.2   (2.9 $(0.4 $158.8    (2.6
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic

 $1.93  $1.98   (2.5 $(0.01 $1.97   (2.0

Earnings per share – diluted

 $1.93  $1.97   (2.0 $(0.01 $1.96   (1.5

(1)Includes the 65-day results of Zale’s from acquisition date to end of second quarter.
(2)Other includes $39.2 million of one-time transaction and severance related costs.

Net (debt)/cash

Net (debt)/cash is



42


1. Income statement at constant exchange rates
Movements in the total of cashUS dollar to British pound and cash equivalents less loansCanadian dollar exchange rates have an impact on Signet’s results. The UK Jewelry division functions in British pounds and overdrafts, and long-term debt, and is helpful in providing a measurethe Canadian reporting unit of the total indebtednessZale Jewelry segment functions in Canadian dollars as sales and a majority of operating expenses are incurred in those foreign currencies. The results for each are then translated into US dollars for external reporting purposes. Management believes it assists in understanding the business.

(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  February 1,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $215.0  $247.6   $212.9  

Loans and overdrafts

   (31.2)  (19.3)  (1.7

Long-term debt

   (1,379.1)  —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (debt)/cash

  $(1,195.3) $228.3   $211.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Free cash flow

Free cash flowperformance of Signet and its segments if constant currency figures are given. This is a non-GAAP measure defined asparticularly so in periods when exchange rates are volatile. The constant currency amounts are calculated by retranslating the net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment, net.prior year figures using the current year’s exchange rate. Management considers that it is helpfuluseful to exclude the impact of movements in understanding how the business is generating cash from itsUS dollar to British pound and Canadian dollar exchange rates to analyze and explain changes and trends in Signet’s sales and costs.

          
(in millions, except per share amounts)13 weeks ended Change % Impact of exchange rate movement 13 weeks ended August 2, 2014 at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) Change at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) %
Sales by segments:August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014        
Sterling Jewelers$858.5
 $810.4
 5.9 % $
 $810.4
 5.9 %
Zale Jewelry336.4
 215.0
 56.5 % (6.1) 208.9
 61.0 %
Piercing Pagoda52.9
 32.5
 62.8 % 
 32.5
 62.8 %
UK Jewelry159.1
 162.9
 (2.3)% (13.3) 149.6
 6.4 %
Other3.7
 5.1
 (27.5)% 
 5.1
 (27.5)%
 1,410.6
 1,225.9
 15.1 % (19.4) 1,206.5
 16.9 %
Cost of sales(919.8) (816.9) (12.6)% 14.4
 (802.5) (14.6)%
Gross margin490.8
 409.0
 20.0 % (5.0) 404.0
 21.5 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses(452.8) (379.2) (19.4)% 5.1
 (374.1) (21.0)%
Other operating income, net62.8
 53.7
 16.9 % (0.1) 53.6
 17.2 %
Operating income (loss):           
Sterling Jewelers157.8
 129.9
 21.5 % 
 129.9
 21.5 %
Zale Jewelry(1)
(2.0) (8.0) 75.0 % 
 (8.0) 75.0 %
Piercing Pagoda(2)
(0.1) (1.8) 94.4 % 
 (1.8) 94.4 %
UK Jewelry3.2
 1.1
 190.9 % (0.1) 1.0
 220.0 %
Other(3)(4)
(58.1) (37.7) (54.1)% 0.1
 (37.6) (54.5)%
 100.8
 83.5
 20.7 % 
 83.5
 20.7 %
Interest expense, net(11.1) (13.7) 19.0 % 
 (13.7) 19.0 %
Income before income taxes89.7
 69.8
 28.5 % 
 69.8
 28.5 %
Income taxes(27.5) (11.8) (133.1)% 
 (11.8) (133.1)%
Net income$62.2
 $58.0
 7.2 % $
 $58.0
 7.2 %
Basic earnings per share$0.78
 $0.73
 6.8 % $
 $0.73
 6.8 %
Diluted earnings per share$0.78
 $0.72
 8.3 % $
 $0.72
 8.3 %
(1) Includes net operating loss of $4.4 million and investing activities that can be used$9.4 million related to meet the financing needs of the business. Free cash flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditure.

   13 weeks ended  26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $110.4   $13.4   $183.9   $58.5  

Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net

   (61.9  (30.4  (90.0  (53.6)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Free cash flow

  $48.5   $(17.0) $93.9   $4.9  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”)

EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as earnings before interest and income taxes (operating income), depreciation and amortization, and non-cash acquisition related accounting adjustments. EBITDA is an important indicator of operating performance as it excludes the effects of financingpurchase accounting associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for the 13 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and investing activities by eliminatingAugust 2, 2014, respectively.

(2) Includes net operating loss of $0.7 million and $2.1 million related to the effects of interest, depreciationpurchase accounting associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for the 13 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and amortization costs,August 2, 2014, respectively.
(3) Includes $43.6 million of transaction-related and integration expenses for the 13 weeks ended August 1, 2015, which are primarily attributed to the legal settlement over appraisal rights and consulting expenses.
(4) Includes $30.8 million of transaction-related and integration expenses for the 13 weeks ended August 2, 2014, which are primarily attributed to one-time transaction and severance related costs.



43


(in millions, except per share amounts)26 weeks ended Change % Impact of exchange rate movement 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014 at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) Change at constant exchange rates (non-GAAP) %
Sales by segments:August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014        
Sterling Jewelers$1,802.7
 $1,713.9
 5.2 % $
 $1,713.9
 5.2 %
Zale Jewelry709.3
 215.0
 229.9 % (6.1) 208.9
 239.5 %
Piercing Pagoda117.1
 32.5
 260.3 % 
 32.5
 260.3 %
UK Jewelry305.6
 314.6
 (2.9)% (27.6) 287.0
 6.5 %
Other6.5
 6.0
 8.3 % 
 6.0
 8.3 %
 2,941.2
 2,282.0
 28.9 % (33.7) 2,248.3
 30.8 %
Cost of sales(1,884.5) (1,465.8) (28.6)% 24.8
 (1,441.0) (30.8)%
Gross margin1,056.7
 816.2
 29.5 % (8.9) 807.3
 30.9 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses(906.0) (689.7) (31.4)% 9.0
 (680.7) (33.1)%
Other operating income, net126.3
 107.7
 17.3 % 
 107.7
 17.3 %
Operating income (loss):           
Sterling Jewelers336.0
 296.2
 13.4 % 
 296.2
 13.4 %
Zale Jewelry(1)
8.4
 (8.0) 205.0 % 
 (8.0) 205.0 %
Piercing Pagoda(2)
5.0
 (1.8) 377.8 % 
 (1.8) 377.8 %
UK Jewelry3.7
 1.1
 236.4 % (0.1) 1.0
 270.0 %
Other(3)(4)
(76.1) (53.3) (42.8)% 0.2
 (53.1) (43.3)%
 277.0
 234.2
 18.3 % 0.1
 234.3
 18.2 %
Interest expense, net(22.1) (15.5) (42.6)% 
 (15.5) (42.6)%
Income before income taxes254.9
 218.7
 16.6 % 0.1
 218.8
 16.5 %
Income taxes(73.9) (64.1) (15.3)% 
 (64.1) (15.3)%
Net income$181.0
 $154.6
 17.1 % $0.1
 $154.7
 17.0 %
Basic earnings per share$2.27
 $1.93
 17.6 % $0.01
 $1.94
 17.0 %
Diluted earnings per share$2.26
 $1.93
 17.1 % $
 $1.93
 17.1 %

(1) Includes net operating loss of $13.5 million and $9.4 million related to the effect of purchase accounting adjustments. Management believes this financial measure is helpfulassociated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively.
(2) Includes net operating loss of $3.0 million and $2.1 million related to enhance investors’ abilitythe effect of purchase accounting associated with the acquisition of Zale Corporation for the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively.
(3) Includes $50.0 million of transaction-related and integration expenses for the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015, which are primarily attributed to analyze trends in our businessthe legal settlement over appraisal rights and evaluate our performance relativeconsulting expenses.
(4) Includes $39.2 million of transaction-related and integration expenses for the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, which are primarily attributed to other companies.

   13 weeks ended   26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
   August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Operating income

  $83.5   $105.5    $234.2   $248.3  

Depreciation and amortization on property, plant and equipment

   34.3(1)   25.5     62.3(1)   51.1  

Amortization of definite lived intangibles

   2.2(1)(2)   —       2.2(1)(2)   —    

Amortization of unfavorable leases and contracts

   (5.9)(2)   —       (5.9)(2)   —    

Other non-cash accounting adjustments

   15.2(2)   —       15.2(2)   —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBITDA

  $129.3   $131.0    $308.0   $299.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Total amount of depreciation and amortization reflected on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows reflects $36.5 million and $64.5 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively, which includes $2.2 million related to the amortization of definite lived intangibles, primarily favorable leases and trade names.
(2)Total amount of operating loss relating to Acquisition accounting adjustments is $11.5 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, as reflected in the non-GAAP tables below.

one-time transaction and severance related costs.



44


2. Operating data reflecting the impact of acquisition relatedZale operations and acquisition-related costs and organic results

The table below table reflects the impact of the Zale operations, costs associated with the integration of the acquisition of Zale Corporation, along with certain other accounting adjustments made. Management finds the information useful to analyze the results of the business excluding these items in order to appropriately evaluate the performance of the business without the impact of significant and unusual items.

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

(in millions, except per share amounts)

  Signet  organic
results
  Zale
operations(1)
  Accounting
adjustments(2)
  Severance
costs(3)
  Transaction
costs(4)
  Capital
structure
&
financing(5)
  Signet
consolidated,
as reported
 

Sales

  $978.4   $256.8   $(9.3 $—     $—     $—     $1,225.9  

Cost of sales

   (638.4  (173.3  (5.2  —      —      —      (816.9
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   340.0    83.5    (14.5  —      —      —      409.0  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (269.6  (81.8  3.0    (13.7  (17.1  —      (379.2

Other operating income, net

   53.7    —      —      —      —      —      53.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

   124.1    1.7    (11.5  (13.7  (17.1  —      83.5  

Interest expense, net

   (0.7  (0.2  (1.2  —      —      (11.6  (13.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   123.4    1.5    (12.7  (13.7  (17.1  (11.6  69.8  

Income taxes

   (43.5  (0.6  4.8    5.2    5.9    16.4    (11.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   79.9    0.9    (7.9  (8.5  (11.2  4.8    58.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – diluted

  $1.00   $0.01   $(0.10 $(0.11 $(0.14 $0.06   $0.72  

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

(% of sales)

  Signet organic
results
  Zale
operations(1)
              Signet
consolidated,
as reported
 

Sales

   100.0  100.0      100.0

Cost of sales

   (65.2  (67.5      (66.6
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Gross margin

   34.8    32.5        33.4  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (27.6  (31.8      (31.0

Other operating income, net

   5.5    0.0        4.4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Operating income

   12.7    0.7        6.8  

Interest expense, net

   (0.1  (0.1      (1.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   12.6    0.6        5.7  

Income taxes

   (4.4  (0.2      (1.0
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net income

   8.2    0.4        4.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

(a) Second Quarter Fiscal 2016 operating data reflecting the impact of Zale operations and acquisition-related costs
Second quarter of Fiscal 2016
in millions
Adjusted Signet excluding Zale (1)
 Zale operations Adjusted Signet 
Accounting adjustments (2)
 
Transaction costs (3)
 Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales$1,021.3
 $396.5
 $1,417.8
 $(7.2) $
 $1,410.6
Cost of sales(657.0) (260.7) (917.7) (2.1) 
 (919.8)
Gross margin364.3
 135.8
 500.1
 (9.3) 
 490.8
Selling, general and administrative expenses(280.8) (132.6) (413.4) 4.2
 (43.6) (452.8)
Other operating income, net63.0
 (0.2) 62.8
 
 
 62.8
Operating income (loss)146.5
 3.0
 149.5
 (5.1) (43.6) 100.8
Interest expense, net(11.0) (0.1) (11.1) 
 
 (11.1)
Income before income taxes135.5
 2.9
 138.4
 (5.1) (43.6) 89.7
Income taxes(34.8) (1.0) (35.8) 1.8
 6.5
 (27.5)
Net income (loss)100.7
 1.9
 102.6
 (3.3) (37.1) 62.2
Earnings per share – diluted$1.26
 $0.02
 $1.28
 $(0.04) $(0.46) $0.78
 Adjusted Signet excluding Zale Zale operations Adjusted Signet     Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales(64.3)% (65.8)% (64.7)%     (65.2)%
Gross margin35.7 % 34.2 % 35.3 %     34.8 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses(27.5)% (33.4)% (29.2)%     (32.1)%
Other operating income, net6.2 % (0.1)% 4.4 %     4.5 %
Operating income (loss)14.4 % 0.7 % 10.5 %     7.2 %
Interest expense, net(1.1)%  % (0.8)%     (0.8)%
Income before income taxes13.3 % 0.7 % 9.7 %     6.4 %
Income taxes(3.4)% (0.2)% (2.5)%     (2.0)%
Net income (loss)9.9 % 0.5 % 7.2 %     4.4 %
(1)
Includes the 65-day results of Zale’s from acquisition date to the end of second quarter.capital structure and financing costs.
(2)
Includes deferred revenue adjustments related to acquisition accounting which resulted in a reset of deferred revenue associated with extended service plans previously sold by Zale Corporation. Similar to Signet’sthe Sterling Jewelers division, historically, Zale Corporation deferred the revenue generated by the sale of lifetime warranties and recognized revenue in relation to the pattern of costs expected to be incurred, which included a profit margin on activities related to the initial selling effort. In acquisition accounting, deferred revenue is only recognized when a legal performance obligation is assumed by the acquirer. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition. The acquisition accounting adjustment results in a reduction to the deferred revenue balance from $183.8 million to $93.0$93.3 million as of May 29, 2014 as the fair value was determined through the estimation of costs remaining to be incurred, plus a reasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. Revenues generated from the sale of extended services plans subsequent to the Acquisition are recognized in revenue in a manner consistent with Signet’s methodology. Additionally, accounting adjustments include the recognition of a portion of the inventory fair value step-up of $31.3$32.2 million and amortization expense of acquired intangibles.
(3)During the second quarter, Signet incurred $13.7 million of severance costs related to Zale and other management changes. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.
(4)
(3)
Transaction costs include transaction-related and integration expenses associated with advisor fees forare primarily attributed to the legal tax, accountingsettlement over appraisal rights and consulting expenses. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.



45


Year to date Fiscal 2016
in millions
Adjusted Signet excluding Zale (1)
 Zale operations Adjusted Signet 
Accounting adjustments (2)
 
Transaction costs (3)
 Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales$2,114.8
 $842.2
 $2,957.0
 $(15.8) $
 $2,941.2
Cost of sales(1,327.1) (548.4) (1,875.5) (9.0) 
 (1,884.5)
Gross margin787.7
 293.8
 1,081.5
 (24.8) 
 1,056.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses(601.3) (263.0) (864.3) 8.3
 (50.0) (906.0)
Other operating income, net127.2
 (0.9) 126.3
 
 
 126.3
Operating income (loss)313.6
 29.9
 343.5
 (16.5) (50.0) 277.0
Interest expense, net(21.2) (0.9) (22.1) 
 
 (22.1)
Income before income taxes292.4
 29.0
 321.4
 (16.5) (50.0) 254.9
Income taxes(77.4) (11.2) (88.6) 5.8
 8.9
 (73.9)
Net income (loss)215.0
 17.8
 232.8
 (10.7) (41.1) 181.0
Earnings per share – diluted$2.69
 $0.22
 $2.91
 $(0.13) $(0.52) $2.26
 Adjusted Signet excluding Zale Zale operations Adjusted Signet     Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales(62.8)% (65.1)% (63.4)%     (64.1)%
Gross margin37.2 % 34.9 % 36.6 %     35.9 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses(28.4)% (31.2)% (29.2)%     (30.8)%
Other operating income, net6.0 % (0.1)% 4.2 %     4.3 %
Operating income (loss)14.8 % 3.6 % 11.6 %     9.4 %
Interest expense, net(1.0)% (0.2)% (0.7)%     (0.7)%
Income before income taxes13.8 % 3.4 % 10.9 %     8.7 %
Income taxes(3.6)% (1.3)% (3.0)%     (2.5)%
Net income (loss)10.2 % 2.1 % 7.9 %     6.2 %
(5)Financing costs include those costs to support the new capital structure. Included within the second quarter expense is a one-time write-off of $0.7 million associated with Signet’s capitalized debt issuance costs associated with its prior credit facility agreement. These financing costs were offset by savings associated with Signet’s lower annual effective tax rate of 29.3%. The reduction in Signet’s forecasted annual effective tax rate primarily reflects the benefit of Signet’s amended
(1)
Includes capital structure and financing arrangements utilized to fund the acquisition of Zale Corporation.

Year to date Fiscal 2015

(in millions, except per share amounts)

  Signet organic
results
  Zale
operations(1)
  Accounting
adjustments(2)
  Severance
costs(3)
  Transaction
costs(4)
  Capital
structure
&

financing(5)
  Signet
consolidated,
as reported
 

Sales

  $2,034.5   $256.8   $(9.3 $—     $—     $—     $2,282.0  

Cost of sales

   (1,287.3  (173.3  (5.2  —      —      —      (1,465.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   747.2    83.5    (14.5  —      —      —      816.2  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (571.7  (81.8  3.0    (13.7  (25.5  —      (689.7

Other operating income, net

   107.7    —      —      —      —      —      107.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

   283.2    1.7    (11.5  (13.7  (25.5  —      234.2  

Interest expense, net

   (1.7  (0.2  (1.2  —      —      (12.4  (15.5
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   281.5    1.5    (12.7  (13.7  (25.5  (12.4  218.7  

Income taxes

   (97.7  (0.6  4.8    5.2    7.5    16.7    (64.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   183.8    0.9    (7.9  (8.5  (18.0  4.3    154.6  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share – diluted

  $2.29   $0.01   $(0.10 $(0.11 $(0.22 $0.05   $1.93  

Year to date Fiscal 2015

(% of sales)

  Signet organic
results
  Zale
operations(1)
              Signet
consolidated,
as reported
 

Sales

   100.0  100.0      100.0

Cost of sales

   (63.3  (67.5      (64.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Gross margin

   36.7    32.5        35.8  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (28.1  (31.8      (30.2

Other operating income, net

   5.3    0.0        4.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Operating income

   13.9    0.7        10.3  

Interest expense, net

   (0.1  (0.1      (0.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   13.8    0.6        9.6  

Income taxes

   (4.8  (0.2      (2.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

Net income

   9.0    0.4        6.8  
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

 

 

 

(1)Includes the 65-day results of Zale’s from acquisition date to the end of second quarter.costs.
(2)
Includes deferred revenue adjustments related to acquisition accounting which resulted in a reset of deferred revenue associated with extended service plans previously sold by Zale Corporation. Similar to Signet’sthe Sterling Jewelers division, historically, Zale Corporation deferred the revenue generated by the sale of lifetime warranties and recognized revenue in relation to the pattern of costs expected to be incurred, which included a profit margin on activities related to the initial selling effort. In acquisition accounting, deferred revenue is only recognized when a legal performance obligation is assumed by the acquirer. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition. The acquisition accounting adjustment results in a reduction to the deferred revenue balance from $183.8 million to $93.0$93.3 million as of May 29, 2014 as the fair value was determined through the estimation of costs remaining to be incurred, plus a reasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. Revenues generated from the sale of extended services plans subsequent to the Acquisition are recognized in revenue in a manner consistent with Signet’s methodology. Additionally, accounting adjustments include the recognition of a portion of the inventory fair value step-up of $32.2 million and amortization of acquired intangibles.
(3)
Transaction costs are primarily attributed to the legal settlement over appraisal rights and consulting expenses. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.




46



(b) Second Quarter Fiscal 2015 operating data reflecting the impact of acquisition-related costs
Second quarter of Fiscal 2015
in millions
Adjusted Signet excluding Zale (1)
 Zale operations Adjusted Signet 
Accounting adjustments (2)
 
Transaction costs (3)
 Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales$978.4
 $256.8
 $1,235.2
 $(9.3) $
 $1,225.9
Cost of sales(638.4) (173.3) (811.7) (5.2) 
 (816.9)
Gross margin340.0
 83.5
 423.5
 (14.5) 
 409.0
Selling, general and administrative expenses(269.6) (81.8) (351.4) 3.0
 (30.8) (379.2)
Other operating income, net53.7
 
 53.7
 
 
 53.7
Operating income (loss)124.1
 1.7
 125.8
 (11.5) (30.8) 83.5
Interest expense, net(12.3) (0.2) (12.5) (1.2) 
 (13.7)
Income before income taxes111.8
 1.5
 113.3
 (12.7) (30.8) 69.8
Income taxes(27.1) (0.6) (27.7) 4.8
 11.1
 (11.8)
Net income (loss)84.7
 0.9
 85.6
 (7.9) (19.7) 58.0
Earnings per share – diluted$1.06
 $0.01
 $1.07
 $(0.10) $(0.25) $0.72
 Adjusted Signet excluding Zale Zale operations Adjusted Signet     Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales(65.2)% (67.5)% (65.7)%     (66.6)%
Gross margin34.8 % 32.5 % 34.3 %     33.4 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses(27.6)% (31.8)% (28.4)%     (31.0)%
Other operating income, net5.5 %  % 4.3 %     4.4 %
Operating income (loss)12.7 % 0.7 % 10.2 %     6.8 %
Interest expense, net(1.3)% (0.1)% (1.0)%     (1.1)%
Income before income taxes11.4 % 0.6 % 9.2 %     5.7 %
Income taxes(2.7)% (0.2)% (2.3)%     (1.0)%
Net income (loss)8.7 % 0.4 % 6.9 %     4.7 %
(1)
Includes Signet organic results and capital structure and financing costs to conform with the current year presentation.
(2)
Includes deferred revenue adjustments related to acquisition accounting which resulted in a reset of deferred revenue associated with extended service plans previously sold by Zale Corporation. Similar to the Sterling Jewelers division, historically, Zale Corporation deferred the revenue generated by the sale of lifetime warranties and recognized revenue in relation to the pattern of costs expected to be incurred, which included a profit margin on activities related to the initial selling effort. In acquisition accounting, deferred revenue is only recognized when a legal performance obligation is assumed by the acquirer. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition. The acquisition accounting adjustment results in a reduction to the deferred revenue balance from $183.8 million to $93.3 million as of May 29, 2014 as the fair value was determined through the estimation of costs remaining to be incurred, plus a reasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. Revenues generated from the sale of extended services plans subsequent to the Acquisition are recognized in revenue in a manner consistent with Signet’s methodology. Additionally, accounting adjustments include the recognition of a portion of the inventory fair value step-up of $31.3 million and amortization expense of acquired intangibles.
(3)During the second quarter, Signet incurred $13.7 million of severance
(3)
Transaction costs include transaction-related and integration expenses associated with advisor fees for legal, tax, accounting and consulting expenses. Severance costs related to Zale and other management changes.changes are also included to conform with the current year presentation. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.



47


Year to date Fiscal 2015
in millions
Adjusted Signet excluding Zale (1)
 Zale operations Adjusted Signet 
Accounting adjustments (2)
 
Transaction costs (3)
 Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales$2,034.5
 $256.8
 $2,291.3
 $(9.3) $
 $2,282.0
Cost of sales(1,287.3) (173.3) (1,460.6) (5.2) 
 (1,465.8)
Gross margin747.2
 83.5
 830.7
 (14.5) 
 816.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses(571.7) (81.8) (653.5) 3.0
 (39.2) (689.7)
Other operating income, net107.7
 
 107.7
 
 
 107.7
Operating income (loss)283.2
 1.7
 284.9
 (11.5) (39.2) 234.2
Interest expense, net(14.1) (0.2) (14.3) (1.2) 
 (15.5)
Income before income taxes269.1
 1.5
 270.6
 (12.7) (39.2) 218.7
Income taxes(81.0) (0.6) (81.6) 4.8
 12.7
 (64.1)
Net income (loss)188.1
 0.9
 189.0
 (7.9) (26.5) 154.6
Earnings per share – diluted$2.35
 $0.01
 $2.36
 $(0.10) $(0.33) $1.93
 Adjusted Signet excluding Zale Zale operations Adjusted Signet     Signet consolidated, as reported
Sales100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales(63.3)% (67.5)% (63.7)%     (64.2)%
Gross margin36.7 % 32.5 % 36.3 %     35.8 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses(28.1)% (31.8)% (28.6)%     (30.2)%
Other operating income, net5.3 %  % 4.7 %     4.7 %
Operating income (loss)13.9 % 0.7 % 12.4 %     10.3 %
Interest expense, net(0.7)% (0.1)% (0.6)%     (0.7)%
Income before income taxes13.2 % 0.6 % 11.8 %     9.6 %
Income taxes(4.0)% (0.2)% (3.6)%     (2.8)%
Net income (loss)9.2 % 0.4 % 8.2 %     6.8 %
(4)
(1)
Includes capital structure and financing costs.
(2)
Includes deferred revenue adjustments related to acquisition accounting which resulted in a reset of deferred revenue associated with extended service plans previously sold by Zale Corporation. Similar to the Sterling Jewelers division, historically, Zale Corporation deferred the revenue generated by the sale of lifetime warranties and recognized revenue in relation to the pattern of costs expected to be incurred, which included a profit margin on activities related to the initial selling effort. In acquisition accounting, deferred revenue is only recognized when a legal performance obligation is assumed by the acquirer. The fair value of deferred revenue is determined based on the future obligations associated with the outstanding plans at the time of the Acquisition. The acquisition accounting adjustment results in a reduction to the deferred revenue balance from $183.8 million to $93.3 million as of May 29, 2014 as the fair value was determined through the estimation of costs remaining to be incurred, plus a reasonable profit margin on the estimated costs. Revenues generated from the sale of extended services plans subsequent to the Acquisition are recognized in revenue in a manner consistent with Signet’s methodology. Additionally, accounting adjustments include the recognition of a portion of the inventory fair value step-up of $31.3 million and amortization of acquired intangibles.
(3)
Transaction costs include transaction-related and integration expenses associated with advisor fees for legal, tax, accounting and consulting expenses. These costs are included within Signet’s Other segment.
(5)Financing costs include those costs to support the new capital structure. Included within the second quarter expense is a one-time write-off of $0.7 million associated with Signet’s capitalized debt issuance costs associated with its prior credit facility agreement. These financing costs were offset by savings associated with Signet’s lower annual effective tax rate of 29.3%. The reduction in Signet’s forecasted annual effective tax rate primarily reflects the benefit of Signet’s amended capital structure and financing arrangements utilized to fund the acquisition of Zale Corporation.






48


3. Net cash (debt)
Net cash (debt) is the total of cash and cash equivalents less loans, overdrafts and long-term debt, and is helpful in providing a measure of the total indebtedness of the Company.
(in millions)August 1, 2015 January 31, 2015 August 2, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents$159.8
 $193.6
 $215.0
Loans and overdrafts(82.0) (97.5) (31.2)
Long-term debt(1,348.7) (1,363.8) (1,379.1)
Net debt$(1,270.9) $(1,267.7) $(1,195.3)

4. Free cash flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure defined as the net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment. Management considers that this is helpful in understanding how the business is generating cash from its operating and investing activities that can be used to meet the financing needs of the business. Free cash flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditure.
 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Net cash provided by operating activities$143.6
 $110.4
 $210.6
 $183.9
Purchase of property, plant and equipment(56.0) (61.9) (98.9) (90.0)
Free cash flow$87.6
 $48.5
 $111.7
 $93.9

5. Adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA")
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as earnings before interest and income taxes (operating income), depreciation and amortization, and non-cash acquisition-related accounting adjustments. Adjusted EBITDA is an important indicator of operating performance as it excludes the effects of financing and investing activities by eliminating the effects of interest, depreciation and amortization costs, and non-cash acquisition-related accounting adjustments. Management believes this financial measure is helpful to enhance investors’ ability to analyze trends in our business and evaluate our performance relative to other companies.
 13 weeks ended 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Operating income$100.8
 $83.5
 $277.0
 $234.2
Depreciation and amortization on property, plant and equipment (1)
39.3
 34.3
 77.6
 62.3
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles (1) (2)
3.4
 2.2
 6.9
 2.2
Amortization of unfavorable leases and contracts (2)
(8.8) (5.9) (17.6) (5.9)
Other non-cash accounting adjustments (2)
10.5
 15.2
 27.2
 15.2
Adjusted EBITDA$145.2
 $129.3
 $371.1
 $308.0
(1) Total amount of depreciation and amortization reflected on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 equals $42.7 million and $84.5 million, respectively, which includes $3.4 million and $6.9 million, respectively, related to the amortization of definite-lived intangibles, primarily favorable leases and trade names. Total amount of depreciation and amortization reflected on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014 equals $36.5 million and $64.5 million, respectively, which includes $2.2 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively, related to the amortization of definite-lived intangibles, primarily favorable leases and trade names.
(2) Total net operating loss relating to Acquisition accounting adjustments is $5.1 million and $16.5 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 as reflected in the non-GAAP tables above. Total net operating loss relating to Acquisition accounting adjustments is $11.5 million for the 13 and 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, respectively, as reflected in the non-GAAP tables above.

49



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statementsfinancial statements and the related notes in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the financial and other information included in Signet’s Fiscal 20142015(1)Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results for the second quarter of Fiscal 2016 include 65 days of performance of the Zale, Corporation acquisition that closedwhich was acquired on May 29, 2014 and therefore affect the comparability of Signet’s operating results for the 13 and 26 week periodsweeks ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013.as Zale contributed 65 days of performance during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015 based on the timing of the acquisition. Signet’s results are also affected by transactionadjustments related costs including severance associated with management changes,to purchase accounting adjustments, capital structure amendments and financingtransaction costs associated with debt to fundintegrating the acquisition. For comparability purposes, organicSignet results that exclude transaction, severance, capital structure and financing costs incurredadjustments in connection with the acquisition of Zale Corporation as well as the results of Zale and related accounting acquisition will be referred to within Management’s Discussion and Analysis as organic results."Adjusted Signet." See Non-GAAP measures on pages 43-44.41-48.

Second Quarter Highlights (“second quarter” is the 13 weeks ended August 2, 2014)

Same store sales: up 4.2%.

Same store sales:Operating income: $100.8 million, up 4.8%, Organic$17.3 million or 20.7%. Adjusted(2)(1) same store sales:operating income: $149.5 million, up 6.3%18.8% compared to $125.8 million in second quarter Fiscal 2015.

Diluted earnings per share: $0.78, up 8.3%. Adjusted(1) diluted earnings per share: $1.28, up 19.6% compared to $1.07 in second quarter Fiscal 2015.

Operating income: $83.5 million, down $22.0 million, a decrease of 20.9%

Organic(2) operating income: $124.1 million, up $18.6 million, an increase of 17.6%

Diluted earnings per share: $0.72, down by 14.3%

Organic(2) diluted earnings per share: $1.00, up by 19.0%

Year to Date Highlights

Same store sales: up 3.8%.

Same store sales:Operating income: $277.0 million, up 4.1%, Organic$42.8 million or 18.3%. Adjusted(2)(1) same store sales:operating income: $343.5 million, up 4.7%

Operating income: $234.2 million, down $14.1 million, a decrease of 5.7%

Organic(2) operating income: $283.2 million, up $34.9 million, an increase of 14.1%

Diluted earnings per share: $1.93, down by 2.0%

Organic(2) diluted earnings per share: $2.29, up by 16.2%

(1)Fiscal 2015 is20.6% compared to $284.9 million in the 52 weekprior year ending January 31, 2015 and Fiscal 2014 is the 52 week year ended February 1, 2014.comparable period.
(2)Organic results exclude transaction, severance, and capital structure and financing items incurred as well as
Diluted earnings per share: $2.26, up 17.1%. Adjusted(1) diluted earnings per share: $2.91, up 23.3% compared to $2.36 in the results of Zale operations and relatedprior year comparable period.
(1)
Non-GAAP measure. The Company uses adjusted metrics, which adjust for purchase accounting adjustments. Non-GAAP measure, discussed herein.and transaction costs related to the Zale Acquisition to give investors information as to the Company’s results without regard to the expenses associated with the May 2014 acquisition of Zale.

Certain operating data as a percentage of sales were as follows:

Operating Data

   Second Quarter  Year To Date 
(% of sales)  Fiscal
2015
  Fiscal
2014
  Fiscal
2015
  Fiscal
2014
 

Sales

   100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0

Cost of sales

   (66.6  (64.8  (64.2  (63.0)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   33.4    35.2    35.8    37.0  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   (31.0  (28.5  (30.2  (28.7)

Other operating income, net

   4.4    5.3    4.7    5.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   6.8    12.0    10.3    13.3  

Interest expense, net

   (1.1  (0.1  (0.7  (0.1)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   5.7    11.9    9.6    13.2  

Income taxes

   (1.0  (4.2  (2.8  (4.7)
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

   4.7    7.7    6.8    8.5  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Second Quarter Year To Date
 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
(in millions)$ % of sales $ % of sales $ % of sales $ % of sales
Sales$1,410.6
 100.0 % $1,225.9
 100.0 % $2,941.2
 100.0 % $2,282.0
 100.0 %
Cost of sales(919.8) (65.2) (816.9) (66.6) (1,884.5) (64.1) (1,465.8) (64.2)
Gross margin490.8
 34.8
 409.0
 33.4
 1,056.7
 35.9
 816.2
 35.8
Selling, general and administrative expenses(452.8) (32.1) (379.2) (31.0) (906.0) (30.8) (689.7) (30.2)
Other operating income, net62.8
 4.5
 53.7
 4.4
 126.3
 4.3
 107.7
 4.7
Operating income100.8
 7.2
 83.5
 6.8
 277.0
 9.4
 234.2
 10.3
Interest expense, net(11.1) (0.8) (13.7) (1.1) (22.1) (0.7) (15.5) (0.7)
Income before income taxes89.7
 6.4
 69.8
 5.7
 254.9
 8.7
 218.7
 9.6
Income taxes(27.5) (2.0) (11.8) (1.0) (73.9) (2.5) (64.1) (2.8)
Net income$62.2
 4.4 % $58.0
 4.7 % $181.0
 6.2 % $154.6
 6.8 %

Second quarter sales

In the second quarter, of Fiscal 2015, Signet’s same store sales increased 4.8%4.2%, compared to an increase of 3.6% in the 13 weeks ended August 3, 2013 (“second quarter of Fiscal 2014” or “prior year second quarter”). Total sales were $1,225.9 million compared to $880.2 million in the second quarter of Fiscal 2014, up $345.7 million or 39.3%. The increase was primarily driven by the addition of the Zale division which added $247.5 million of sales, including purchase accounting adjustments, to the second quarter. Organic same store sales increased 6.3% compared to an increase of 3.6%4.8% in the prior year second quarter, and organic total sales of $978.4increased 15.1% to $1,410.6 million increased $98.2 million or 11.2% compared to an increase of 3.1% in the prior year second quarter. eCommerce sales were $50.5 million, which included $11.5 million of Zale eCommerce sales, compared to $31.2$1,225.9 million in the prior year second quarter. OrganicThe increase in sales was primarily driven by favorable sales performance across virtually all store brands. In the second quarter, an operational change related to the Sterling division's extended service plans ("ESP") associated with ring sizing was made to further align Zale and Sterling ESP policies. This change triggered a change in the revenue and expense recognition rates which favorably impacted Signet same store sales by 60 basis points. eCommerce sales in the second quarter were $39.0$65.9 million a 25.0% increase overcompared to $50.5 million in the prior year second quarter. The breakdown of the sales performance by operating division and segment is set out in the table below.

   Change from previous year    

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales(1)
  Non-same
store  sales,
net
  Total sales  at
constant
exchange
rate(4)
  Exchange
translation
impact(4)
  Total
sales
as reported
  Total
sales
(in millions)
 

Sterling Jewelers division

   6.7  2.7%(2)   9.4%  —    9.4 $810.4 

UK Jewelry division

   4.4  1.2%(2)   5.6%  11.5  17.1 $162.9 

Zale Jewelry

   (0.6)%   —    —    —    —   $215.0  

Piercing Pagoda

   (2.8)%   —    —    —    —   $32.5  

Zale division

   (0.9)%   —    —    —    —   $247.5  

Other(5)

   —    nm   nm   —  %  nm  $5.1  
       

 

 

 

Signet

   4.8  32.1%(3)   36.9%  2.4  39.3 $1,225.9 
       

 

 

 

Organic Signet

   6.3  3.0%(2)   9.3%  1.9  11.2 $978.4 
       

 

 

 


50


 Change from previous year    
Second quarter of Fiscal 2016
Same
store
sales
(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 
Total sales at constant
exchange
rate
(3)
 
Exchange
translation
impact
(3)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
Sterling Jewelers division3.3% 2.6 % 5.9 % % 5.9% $858.5 
Zale Jewelry5.4% 55.6 % 61.0 % (4.5)% 56.5% $336.4 
Piercing Pagoda8.4% 54.4 % 62.8 % % 62.8% $52.9 
Zale division(4)
5.8% 55.5 % 61.3 % (4.0)% 57.3% $389.3 
UK Jewelry division5.1% 1.3 % 6.4 % (8.7)% (2.3)% $159.1 
Other(5)
% (27.5)% (27.5)% % (27.5)% $3.7 
Signet4.2% 12.7 % 16.9 % (1.8)% 15.1% $1,410.6 
Adjusted Signet(3)
          $1,417.8 
Adjusted Signet excluding Zale(3)
            $1,021.3 
(1) Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
(2) Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3) Non-GAAP measure.
(4) Zale division results in the prior year second quarter reflect the 65 days of performance subsequent to the acquisition of Zale Corporation as of May 29, 2014.
(5) Includes sales from Signet's diamond sourcing initiative.

Sterling Jewelers sales
In the second quarter, the Sterling Jewelers division's total sales were $858.5 million compared to $810.4 million in the prior year second quarter, up 5.9% and same store sales increased 3.3%, compared to an increase of 6.7% in the prior year second quarter. Sterling sales increases were broad-based across store banners, product brands and non-brands, as well as multi-channels. Bridal and diamond jewelry was particularly strong. In the second quarter, the average transaction value increased and the number of transactions decreased for both Kay and Jared due principally to merchandise mix.
 Change from previous year  
Second quarter of Fiscal 2016
Same
store
sales
(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
Kay4.1% 2.5% 6.6% $530.0 
Jared(3)
2.7% 5.1% 7.8% $285.4 
Regional brands(1.8)% (9.5)% (11.3)% $43.1 
Sterling Jewelers division3.3% 2.6% 5.9% $858.5 
(1)
(1)
Based only on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open andor owned for 12 months.
(3)
Includes all sales fromsmaller concept Jared stores not open for 12 months, in addition to all sales from Zale acquired stores.such as Jared Vault and Jared Jewelry Boutique.
 
Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)
 Merchandise Transactions
 Average Value Change from previous year Change from previous year
Second quarterFiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
Kay$441
 $422
 4.5% 6.0 % (2.1)% 2.8 %
Jared$567
 $547
 3.7% (0.4)% (3.0)% 6.0 %
Regional brands$437
 $426
 2.6% 3.4 % (5.7)% (1.3)%
Sterling Jewelers division$476
 $457
 4.2% 3.9 % (2.5)% 3.4 %
(1)     Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(4)Non-GAAP measure, discussed herein.
(5)Includes sales from Signet’s diamond sourcing initiative.
nmNot meaningful

Sterling Jewelers sales

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, Sterling Jewelers division’s total sales were $810.4 million compared to $741.1 million in the second quarter of Fiscal 2014, up $69.3 million or 9.4%. Same store sales increased 6.7% compared to an increase of 4.9% in the second quarter of Fiscal 2014. Sterling Jewelers’ sales increases in the second quarter were driven by particular strength in bridal brands, fashion diamonds and watches. In the quarter, Kay and Jared experienced increases in both transaction counts and average transaction value. In Kay, strong brand performance was the primary driver of the increase in both transactions and average transaction value. Strong non-branded performance and beads drove transactional increases in Jared with beads influencing the average transaction value. During the second quarter, the remaining 13 Ultra stores were converted to Jared Vault stores in outlet centers. eCommerce sales were $29.5 million compared to $25.3 million in the second quarter of Fiscal 2014, up $4.2 million or 16.6%. See the table below for further analysis of sales.

   Sales change from previous year    

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales
  Non-same
store  sales,
net(1)
  Total
sales as
reported
  Total
sales
(in millions)
 

Kay

   8.1  2.9  11.0 $496.5  

Jared(2)

   4.9  6.2  11.1 $264.7  

Regional brands

   1.9  (13.6)%   (11.7)%  $49.2  
     

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers division

   6.7  2.7  9.4 $810.4  
     

 

 

 

(1)Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(2)
Includes 33 stores that were converted from regional brands, which consist of 31 Jared Vaults, which operate in outlet centers, and 2 Jared concept test stores. Reported sales in the prior year have been reclassified to align with current year presentation.

   Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)  Merchandise Transactions 
   Average Value   Change from previous year  Change from previous year 

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

  Fiscal 2015   Fiscal 2014   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014  Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 

Kay

  $422    $399     5.8  4.7  4.5  2.2

Jared

  $547    $545     0.3  3.0  14.0  1.4

Regional brands

  $423    $404     4.7  3.3  (10.8)%   (15.3)% 

Sterling Jewelers division

  $457    $437     4.6  4.3  5.8  0.3

(1)Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(2)Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are sales tax in the US, repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.



51


Zale sales
The Zale division's second quarter total sales were $389.3 million compared to $247.5 million in the prior year second quarter, with the prior year period reflecting 26 fewer days given the acquisition of Zale Corporation occurred on May 29, 2014. Zale Jewelry contributed $336.4 million and Piercing Pagoda contributed $52.9 million of revenues. Zale division total sales included purchase accounting adjustments of $(7.2) million related to a reduction of deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales. Same store sales increased 5.8% in the current year compared to (0.9)% in the prior year second quarter, driven by sales associate training, branded bridal, branded diamond fashion merchandise and new marketing creative.
 Change from previous year  
Second quarter of Fiscal 2016
Same store sales(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 
Total sales at
constant
exchange
rate
(3)
 
Exchange
translation
impact
(3)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
Zales6.2 % 59.3%65.5%%65.5% $262.0
Gordon’s(7.6)% 39.1%31.5%%31.5% $16.7
Zale US Jewelry5.3 % 57.7%63.0%%63.0% $278.7
Peoples6.7 % 49.1%55.8%(21.5)%34.3% $49.7
Mappins % 33.3%33.3%(19.0)%14.3% $8.0
Zale Canada Jewelry5.7 % 46.5%52.2%(21.1)%31.1% $57.7
Total Zale Jewelry5.4 % 55.6%61.0%(4.5)%56.5% $336.4
Piercing Pagoda8.4 % 54.4%62.8%%62.8% $52.9
Zale division(4)
5.8 % 55.5%61.3%(4.0)%57.3% $389.3
(1)
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
(2)     Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)     Non-GAAP measure.
(4)     The Zale division same store sales includes merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues.

UK Jewelry sales

In the second quarter, of Fiscal 2015, the UK Jewelry division’s total sales were $162.9decreased 2.3% to $159.1 million compared to $139.1$162.9 million in the prior year second quarter of Fiscal 2014, up $23.8 million or 17.1% and up 5.6%increased 6.4% at constant exchange rates. Same store sales increased 4.4%5.1% compared to a decreasean increase of 2.4%4.4% in the prior year second quarter of Fiscal 2014. Sales were driven by strategic initiatives to grow diamondquarter. The increase in sales and the continuing success of the watch business. The number of merchandise transactions increased primarily due to fashion and gold jewelry and beads in H.Samuel and fashion watches in Ernest Jones combined with more effective store events. The decline in average transaction value was primarily driven by sales mix. eCommerce sales were $9.5 million compared to $5.9 million in the second quarter of Fiscal 2014, up $3.6 million or 61.0%. See the table below for further analysis of sales.

   Sales change from previous year    

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales
  Non-same
store  sales,
net(1)
  Total sales  at
constant
exchange
rate(2)
  Exchange
translation
impact(2)
  Total
sales
as reported
  Total
sales
(in millions)
 

H.Samuel

   2.6  (1.0)%   1.6  11.1  12.7 $81.8  

Ernest Jones(3)

   6.4  3.6  10.0  12.0  22.0 $81.1  
       

 

 

 

UK Jewelry division

   4.4  1.2  5.6  11.5  17.1 $162.9  
       

 

 

 

(1)Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(2)Non-GAAP measure, discussed herein.
(3)Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.

   Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)  Merchandise Transactions 
   Average Value   Change from previous year  Change from previous year 

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

  Fiscal 2015   Fiscal 2014   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014  Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 

H.Samuel

  £73    £75     (2.7)%   1.4  3.0  (5.4)% 

Ernest Jones(3)

  £268    £277     (3.2)%   (8.9)%   11.8  2.2

UK Jewelry division

  £115    £116     (0.9)%   (2.5)%   4.8  (4.0)% 

(1)Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(2)Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including VAT, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.
(3)Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.

Zale sales (as Zale Corporation was acquired during Fiscal 2015, there is no comparable period)

The Zale division’s total sales were $247.5 million second quarter of Fiscal 2015 including $11.5 million in eCommerce sales. Zale division consists of two operating segments: Zale Jewelry and Piercing Pagoda. In the second quarter, Zale Jewelry contributed $215.0 million of revenues and Piercing Pagoda contributed $32.5 million of revenues. Total Zale division included purchase accounting adjustments of $(9.3) million related to deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales. The Zale division same store sales decreased 0.9%. Total Zale division sales were driven by branded salesstrong results in bridal and fashion in the Zale Jewelry operating segment offset by non-branded merchandise.watches. The overall sales performance was affected by disruptions due to the mergeraverage transaction value and management changes and a change in promotional cadencenumber of transactions increased in both bridalH.Samuel and fashion versus the prior year period. See the table below for further analysis of sales.

Second quarter of Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales
  Total
sales
(in millions)
 

Zales

   (1.0)%  $158.3  

Gordon’s

   (5.7)%  $12.7  
   

 

 

 

Zale US Jewelry

   (1.3)%  $171.0  

Peoples

   3.9 $37.0  

Mappins

   (4.3)%  $7.0  
   

 

 

 

Zale Canada Jewelry

   2.5 $44.0  
   

 

 

 

Total Zale Jewelry

   (0.6)%  $215.0  
   

 

 

 

Piercing Pagoda

   (2.8)%  $32.5  
   

 

 

 

Zale division(1)

   (0.9)%  $247.5  
   

 

 

 

Ernest Jones due principally to merchandise mix.
 Change from previous year  
Second quarter of Fiscal 2016
Same
store
sales
(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 
Total sales at
constant
exchange
rate
(3)
 
Exchange
translation
impact
(3)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
H.Samuel1.9% (0.3)% 1.6% (8.3)% (6.7)% $76.3 
Ernest Jones8.3% 2.8 % 11.1% (9.0)% 2.1% $82.8 
UK Jewelry division5.1% 1.3 % 6.4% (8.7)% (2.3)% $159.1 
(1)The Zale division
(1)
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales includes merchandisefor the period and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues.comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.

(2)     Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3)     Non-GAAP measure.
 
Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)

Merchandise Transactions
 Average Value
Change from previous year
Change from previous year
Second quarterFiscal 2016
Fiscal 2015
Fiscal 2016
Fiscal 2015
Fiscal 2016
Fiscal 2015
H.Samuel£74
 £73
 1.4% (2.7)% 0.4% 4.2%
Ernest Jones£274
 £267
 2.6% (6.2)% 6.9% 11.7%
UK Jewelry division£120
 £115
 4.3% (2.6)% 1.8% 5.7%
(1)     Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(2)     Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including value added tax (“VAT”), net of discounts and returns.


52

Table of Contents

Year to date sales

In the year to date, Signet’s same store sales increased 3.8%, compared to an increase of 4.1% in the prior year second quarter, and total sales were $2,282.0increased 28.9% to $2,941.2 million compared to $1,873.8$2,282.0 million in the 26 weeks ended August 3, 2013.prior year second quarter. The increase in total sales was primarily driven by the additionacquisition of the Zale division, which resulted added $247.5$826.4 million of sales including purchasing accounting adjustments,in the current year to date period compared with $247.5 million in the prior year to date period. eCommerce sales in the year to date period were $142.8 million compared to $89.2 million in the prior year to date period. Organic
 Change from previous year    
Year to date Fiscal 2016
Same
store
sales
(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 
Total sales at constant
exchange
rate
(3)
 
Exchange
translation
impact
(3)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
Sterling Jewelers division2.8% 2.4% 5.2% % 5.2% $1,802.7 
Zale Jewelry5.5% 234.0% 239.5% (9.6)% 229.9% $709.3 
Piercing Pagoda7.1% 253.2% 260.3% % 260.3% $117.1 
Zale division(4)
5.7% 236.6% 242.3% (8.4)% 233.9% $826.4 
UK Jewelry division5.6% 0.9% 6.5% (9.4)% (2.9)% $305.6 
Other(5)
% 8.3% 8.3% % 8.3% $6.5 
Signet3.8% 27.0% 30.8% (1.9)% 28.9% $2,941.2 
Adjusted Signet(3)
          $2,957.0 
Adjusted Signet excluding Zale(3)
            $2,114.8 
(1) Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales increased 4.7%for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
(2) Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months.
(3) Non-GAAP measure.
(4) Zale division results in the prior year to date period reflect the 65 days of performance subsequent to the acquisition of Zale Corporation as of May 29, 2014.
(5) Includes sales from Signet's diamond sourcing initiative.
Sterling Jewelers sales
In the year to date, the Sterling Jewelers division's total sales were $1,802.7 million compared to an increase of 5.1%$1,713.9 million in the prior year comparable period, up 5.2% and organic totalsame store sales of $2,034.5 million increased $160.7 million or 8.6%2.8%, compared to an increase of 6.8%4.8% in the comparable prior year period. eCommerceSterling sales increases were $89.2 million, which included $11.5 millionbroad-based across store banners as well as multi-channels. Bridal and diamond jewelry was particularly strong. In the year to date, the average transaction price increased and the number of Zale eCommerce sales, comparedtransactions decreased for both Kay and Jared due principally to $62.3 million in the prior year comparable period. Organic eCommerce sales were $77.7 million, a 24.7% increase over prior year second quarter. The breakdown of the sales performance is set out in the table below.

   Change from previous year    

Year to date Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales(1)
  Non-same
store  sales,
net
  Total sales  at
constant
exchange
rate(4)
  Exchange
translation
impact(4)
  Total
sales
as reported
  Total
sales
(in  millions)
 

Sterling Jewelers division

   4.8%  2.4%(2)  7.2%  —  %  7.2 $1,713.9 

UK Jewelry division

   4.3%  0.1%(2)  4.4%  10.4%  14.8 $314.6 

Zale Jewelry

   (0.6)%   —    —    —    —   $215.0  

Piercing Pagoda

   (2.8)%   —    —    —    —   $32.5  

Zale division

   (0.9)%   —    —    —    —   $247.5  

Other(5)

   —    nm   nm   —  %  nm  $6.0  
       

 

 

 

Signet

   4.1%  15.9%(3)  20.0%  1.8%  21.8 $2,282.0 
       

 

 

 

Organic Signet

   4.7%  2.3%(2)  7.0%  1.6%  8.6 $2,034.5 
       

 

 

 

merchandise mix.
 Change from previous year  
Year to date Fiscal 2016
Same
store
sales
(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
Kay3.8% 2.5% 6.3% $1,126.6 
Jared(3)
1.4% 4.6% 6.0% $580.9 
Regional brands(1.3)% (9.1)% (10.4)% $95.2 
Sterling Jewelers division2.8% 2.4% 5.2% $1,802.7 
(1)
Based only on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
(2)Includes all sales from stores not opened and owned for 12 months.
(3)
(2)
Includes all sales from stores not open for 12 months, in addition to all sales from Zale acquired stores.
(4)Non-GAAP measure, discussed herein.
(5)Includes sales from Signet’s diamond sourcing initiative.
nmNot meaningful

Sterling Jewelers sales

In the year to date, Sterling Jewelers division’s total sales were $1,713.9 million compared to $1,598.3 million in the prior year comparable period, up $115.6 million or 7.2%. Same store sales increased 4.8% compared to an increase of 6.6% in the comparable prior year period. Sterling Jewelers’ sales increases were driven by particular strength in bridal brands, fashion diamonds and watches. For the year to date, Kay and Jared experienced increases in both transaction counts and the average transaction value in Kay and declined in Jared. The decline in average merchandise transaction value was driven primarily by sales mix, including higher bead sales. eCommerce sales were $60.4 million compared to $50.9 million in the prior year period up $9.5 million or 18.7%. See the table below for further analysis of sales.

   Sales change from previous year    

Year to date Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales
  Non-same
store  sales,
net(1)
  Total
sales as
reported
  Total
sales
(in millions)
 

Kay

   6.0  3.0  9.0 $1,058.9  

Jared(2)

   3.6  5.8  9.4 $544.7  

Regional brands

   (0.4)%   (14.2)%   (14.6)%  $110.3  
     

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers division

   4.8  2.4  7.2 $1,713.9  
     

 

 

 

(1)Includes all sales from stores not openor owned for 12 months.
(2)
(3)
Includes 33smaller concept Jared stores that were converted from regional brands, which consist of 31such as Jared Vaults, which operate in outlet centers,Vault and 2 Jared concept test stores. Reported sales in the prior year have been reclassified to align with current year presentation.Jewelry Boutique.

   Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)  Merchandise Transactions 
   Average Value   Change from previous year  Change from previous year 

Year to date Fiscal 2015

  Fiscal 2015   Fiscal 2014   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014  Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 

Kay

  $402    $391     2.8  4.8  7.9  4.6

Jared

  $545    $554     (1.6)%   2.0  14.6  5.8

Regional brands

  $410    $400     2.5  3.4  (8.6)%   (12.6)% 

Sterling Jewelers division

  $439    $432     1.6  4.1  8.3  3.2

 
Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)
 Merchandise Transactions
 Average Value Change from previous year Change from previous year
Year to date Fiscal 2016Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
Kay$423
 $401
 5.5% 2.8 % (2.4)% 5.5 %
Jared$562
 $545
 3.1% (2.2)% (3.1)% 8.0 %
Regional brands$424
 $412
 2.9% 1.7 % (5.1)% (0.6)%
Sterling Jewelers division$460
 $440
 4.5% 1.2 % (2.8)% 5.7 %
(1)     Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales on a same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(1)Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(2)
Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise sales are sales tax in the US, repairs, warranty, insurance, employee and other miscellaneous sales.



53


Zale sales
As Zale was acquired May 29, 2014, there is no comparable period presented. In the year to date, the Zale division's total sales were $826.4 million. Zale Jewelry contributed $709.3 million and Piercing Pagoda contributed $117.1 million of revenues. Total Zale division total sales included purchase accounting adjustments of $(15.8) million related to a reduction of deferred revenue associated with extended warranty sales. Same store sales increased 5.7% driven primarily by sales associate training, new marketing creative and branded bridal and branded diamond fashion merchandise in the Zale Jewelry segment.
 Change from previous year  
Year to date Fiscal 2016
Same store sales(1)
 Non-same
store sales,
net
 Total sales at
constant
exchange
rate
 Exchange
translation
impact
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
Zales6.1 %         $559.3
Gordon’s(5.1)%         $37.5
Zale US Jewelry5.4 %         $596.8
Peoples6.7 %         $96.9
Mappins1.4 %         $15.6
Zale Canada Jewelry5.9 %         $112.5
Total Zale Jewelry5.5 %         $709.3
Piercing Pagoda7.1 %         $117.1
Zale division5.7 %         $826.4
(1)
Based on stores open for at least 12 months. eCommerce sales are included in the calculation of same store sales for the period and comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website. The Zale division same store sales includes merchandise and repair sales and excludes warranty and insurance revenues.

UK Jewelry sales

In the year to date, the UK Jewelry division’s total sales were $314.6decreased 2.9% to $305.6 million compared to $274.1$314.6 million in the prior year comparable period up $40.5 million or 14.8% and up 4.4%increased 6.5% at constant exchange rates. Same store sales increased 4.3%5.6% compared to a decreasean increase of 2.3%4.3% in the comparable prior year comparable period. The totalincrease in sales increase was primarily driven by branded bridal, fashion diamond jewelry and fashion watches. Similar to the second quarter, the number of transactions on a year to date basisThe average transaction value increased primarily due to beads and gold jewelry in both H.Samuel and fashion watches in Ernest Jones. The decline in average merchandise transaction wasJones primarily driven by sales mix. eCommerce sales were $17.3 million comparedincreases in diamond sales. The number of merchandise transactions increased in both H.Samuel and Ernest Jones due to $11.4 millionstrong performance in the prior year comparable period, up $5.9 million or 51.8%. See the table below for further analysis ofdiamond, fashion jewelry and watch sales.

   Sales change from previous year    

Year to date Fiscal 2015

  Same
store
sales
  Non-same
store  sales,
net(1)
  Total sales  at
constant
exchange
rate(2)
  Exchange
translation
impact(2)
  Total
sales
as reported
  Total
sales
(in millions)
 

H.Samuel

   2.9  (1.6)%   1.3  10.0  11.3 $160.6  

Ernest Jones(3)

   5.7  2.3  8.0  10.6  18.6 $154.0  
       

 

 

 

UK Jewelry division

   4.3  0.1  4.4  10.4  14.8 $314.6  
       

 

 

 

 Change from previous year  
Year to date Fiscal 2016
Same
store
sales
(1)
 
Non-same
store sales,
net
(2)
 
Total sales at
constant
exchange
rate
(3)
 
Exchange
translation
impact
(3)
 Total
sales
as reported
 Total
sales
(in millions)
H.Samuel3.0% 0.1% 3.1% (9.0)% (5.9)% $151.1 
Ernest Jones8.3% 1.7% 10.0% (9.7)% 0.3% $154.5 
UK Jewelry division5.6% 0.9% 6.5% (9.4)% (2.9)% $305.6 
(1)Includes all sales from
(1)
Based on stores not open for at least 12 months.
(2)Non-GAAP measure, discussed herein.
(3)Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.

   Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)  Merchandise Transactions 
   Average Value   Change from previous year  Change from previous year 

Year to date Fiscal 2015

  Fiscal 2015   Fiscal 2014   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014  Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 

H.Samuel

  £73    £75     (2.7)%   —     4.0  (7.2)% 

Ernest Jones(3)

  £264    £275     (4.0)%   (9.5)%   11.2  3.8

UK Jewelry division

  £113    £115     (1.7)%   (1.7)%   5.4  (5.2)% 

(1)Average merchandise transaction value is defined as net merchandise sales divided by the total number of customer transactions.
(2)Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including VAT, net of discounts and returns. In addition, excluded from net merchandise eCommerce sales are repairs, warranty, insurance, employeeincluded in the calculation of same store sales for the period and other miscellaneous sales.comparative figures from the anniversary of the launch of the relevant website.
(3)Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.

Zale(2)     Includes all sales (as Zale Corporation was acquired during Fiscal 2015, therefrom stores not open for 12 months.
(3)     Non-GAAP measure.
 
Average Merchandise Transaction Value(1)(2)
 Merchandise Transactions
 Average Value Change from previous year Change from previous year
Year to date Fiscal 2016Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
H.Samuel£74
 £73
 1.4% (2.7)% 1.4% 6.3%
Ernest Jones£270
 £262
 3.1% (6.5)% 5.3% 11.6%
UK Jewelry division£117
 £113
 3.5% (4.3)% 2.2% 7.4%
(1)     Average merchandise transaction value is no comparable period)

As Zale Corporation was acquireddefined as net merchandise sales on May 29, 2014, year to datea same store basis divided by the total number of customer transactions.

(2)     Net merchandise sales include all merchandise product sales, including value added tax (“VAT”), net of discounts and second quarter sales are the same.

returns.


54




Cost of sales and gross margin

In the second quarter, gross margin was $409.0$490.8 million or 33.4%34.8% of sales compared to $309.7$409.0 million or 35.2%33.4% of sales in the prior year second quarter. Of the $99.3 million increase in gross margin, $69.0 million was due to the addition of the Zale division. OrganicAdjusted gross margin was $340.0$500.1 million or 34.8%35.3% of sales. The gross margin rate decrease was primarily due to the lower gross margins associated with the Zale division and purchase accounting adjustments. Zale operates with a lower gross margin structure than Sterling Jewelers and represents an area of focus on applying best practices for improvement. The organic gross margin change was driven by the following:

Gross margin dollars in the Sterling Jewelers division increased by $26.2 millionsales, compared to prior year and increased as percentage of sales by 10 basis points. The gross margin rate was favorably impacted by sales mix and lower commodity costs. These benefits were partially offset by the recognition of gold hedge losses incurred in Fiscal 2014 and lower gold spot prices that reduced the recovery on trade-ins and inventory. The net bad debt ratio as a percentage of the division’s total sales increased to 5.2% of sales from 4.9% of sales34.3% in the prior year second quarter. The increase in the ratioadjusted gross margin rate from prior year of 100 basis points was primarily due to improvement in gross merchandise margin through higher sales and favorable commodity costs. Excluding Zale, the growthadjusted gross margin rate was 35.7%, up 90 basis points.

Gross margin dollars in the outstanding receivable balanceSterling Jewelers division increased $25.1 million compared to the prior year second quarter, reflecting higher sales and a gross margin rate increase of 90 basis points. The gross margin rate expansion was driven principally by an improvement in the merchandise margin due to favorable commodity costs partially offset by higher bad debt expense due to credit sales growth.
Gross margin dollars in the Zale division increased $52.3 million compared to the prior year second quarter, reflecting higher sales and an adjusted gross margin rate increase of 170 basis points. The gross margin rate expansion was driven principally by improved merchandise margin attributed to a number of factors, including merchandise synergy initiatives and favorable commodity costs, and leverage on store occupancy.
Gross margin dollars in the UK Jewelry division increased $0.5 million compared to the prior year second quarter, and the gross margin rate increased 100 basis points. The gross margin rate expansion was driven principally by lower store occupancy expenses.
In the year to date, gross margin was $1,056.7 million or 35.9% of sales compared to $816.2 million or 35.8% of sales in the prior year second quarter. Adjusted gross margin was $1,081.5 million or 36.6% of sales compared to 36.3% in the prior year to date period. The increase in the adjusted gross margin rate from prior year of 30 basis points was also due to higher sales and favorable commodity costs. Excluding Zale, the adjusted gross margin rate was 37.2%, up 50 basis points.
Gross margin dollars in the Sterling Jewelers division increased $43.0 million compared to the prior year to date, reflecting higher sales and a gross margin rate increase of 50 basis points. The gross margin rate expansion was driven principally by an improvement in the merchandise margin due to favorable commodity costs partially offset by higher bad debt expense due to credit penetration assales growth.
Gross margin in the credit portfolio continuesyear to perform strongly.

date period for the Zale division is not comparable.

In the UK Jewelry division, gross margin dollars decreased $0.7 million but gross margin rate increased $4.4 million50 basis points compared to the second quarter of Fiscal 2014 and decreasedprior year to date. The decrease in dollars was due to lower gross merchandise margin as a percentageresult of sales by 120 basis points.promotional activity. The gross margin rate increase was impacted primarily by higher sales associated with strategic initiatives around diamond and gold merchandise that, although reduced the divisional gross margin rate, successfully drove incremental gross margin dollars. In addition, the gross margin rate was also impacted by a shift in merchandise mix as a result of strong watch sales. Both of these factors were partially offset bydue to leverage on store occupancy.

occupancy expenses.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SGA”)
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SGA”) were $452.8 million or 32.1% of sales compared to $379.2 million or 31.0% of sales in second quarter Fiscal 2015. The $73.6 million increase was primarily due to the incremental 26 days of Zale operations in this year's quarter, as well as transaction-related expenses of $43.6 million, including the appraisal rights legal settlement of $34.2 million, and a net favorable impact from purchase accounting adjustments of $4.2 million. In the prior year, the net favorable impact from purchase accounting adjustments was $3.0 million and transaction-related expenses were $30.8 million. Second quarter Fiscal 2016 adjusted SGA was $413.4 million or 29.2% of sales compared to 28.4% in the prior year.  The 80 basis point increase was due to incremental investments in Zale principally around advertising, information technology support, and employee benefits. Excluding Zale, the adjusted SGA rate was 27.5%, down 10 basis points, due to leverage on store payroll costs offset in part by higher central costs associated with legal fees related to the appraisal rights litigation.
In the year to date gross margin was $816.2of Fiscal 2016, SGA were $906.0 million or 35.8%30.8% of sales compared to $692.5$689.7 million or 37.0%30.2% of sales in prior year to date period. The $216.3 million increase was primarily due to owning Zale for the entire year to date period compared with 65 days in the prior year comparable period as well as higher transaction costs. Adjusted SGA was $864.3 million or 29.2% of sales compared to adjusted SGA of $653.5 million or 28.6% of sales in the prior year to date period. Organic gross margin was $747.2 million or 36.7% of sales. The organic gross margin change60 basis point increase was driven by higher store operation expenses as well as advertising investments related to Zale. Excluding Zale, the following:

Gross margin dollars in the Sterling Jewelers division increased by $45.5 million compared to the prior year to date andadjusted SGA rate was flat as a percentage of sales. Benefits from sales mix and lower commodity costs were offset by the gold hedge losses and lower gold spot prices discussed previously. The net bad debt ratio as a percentage of the division’s total sales was 3.7% compared to 3.6% in prior year period.

In the UK Jewelry division, gross margin dollars increased $9.8 million compared to the prior year and declined by28.4%, up 30 basis points, primarily fordriven by central costs associated principally with legal fees related to the reasons discussedappraisal rights litigation.

Other operating income, net
Other operating income in the quarter to date period.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SGA”)

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, SGA expenses were $379.2 million compared to $250.5 million in the prior year second quarter, up $128.7 million. As a percentage of sales, SGA increased by 250 basis points to 31.0%. The $128.7 million SGA increase was primarily made up of: $81.8 million from the Zale division, $17.1 million from transaction costs, and $13.7 million from severance costs, partially offset by a $3.0 million SGA reduction from purchase accounting adjustments. Organic SGA was $269.6$62.8 million or 27.6%4.5% of sales compared to the prior year quarter SGA rate of 28.5%. The decrease in the organic SGA rate of 90 basis points was driven primarily by leverage in both the Sterling Jewelers and UK Jewelry division of store staff costs due to higher sales.

In the year to date, SGA expenses were $689.7 million compared to $537.5 million in the prior year to date period, up $152.2 million, and as a percentage of sales increased by 150 basis points to 30.2%. Organic SGA was $571.7 million or 28.1% of sales compared to the prior year rate SGA rate of 28.7%. The decrease in the SGA rate of 60 basis points was primarily due to leverage on store staff costs previously discussed in the quarter to date period. Partially offsetting this benefit in rate was higher advertising expense of $13.5 million primarily due to timing of production costs between the fourth quarter of prior year and the first quarter of Fiscal 2015.

Other operating income, net

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, other operating income, net was $53.7 million or 4.4% of sales compared to $46.3 million or 5.3% of sales in the prior year second quarter. Other operating income, net as percentage of organic sales was 5.5%. This increase was primarily due to higher interest income earned from higher outstanding receivable balances.

In the year to date, other operating income net was $126.3 million or 4.3% of sales compared to $107.7 million or 4.7% of sales compared to $93.3 million or 5.0% of sales in the prior year to date period. Other operatingThis increase was primarily due to higher interest income net as percentageearned from higher outstanding receivable balances.

55


Operating income

In

Operating income for the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, operating income was $83.5$100.8 million, or 6.8%7.2% of sales compared to $105.5$83.5 million or 12.0%6.8% of sales in the prior year second quarter. OrganicThere were $48.7 million of unfavorable purchase accounting and transaction-related adjustments this year which reduced operating income in the second quarter compared with adjustments of $42.3 million in the prior year period. Adjusted operating income was $124.1$149.5 million, or 12.7% of sales. Operating income consisted of the following components:

Sterling Jewelers division’s operating income was $129.9 million or 16.0%10.5% of sales compared to $111.9adjusted operating income of $125.8 million or 15.1%10.2% of sales in the prior year second quarter.

The 30 basis point increase in adjusted operating margins was due principally to higher sales and gross margin. Signet's operating income consisted of the following components:

UK Jewelry

 Second Quarter
 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
 
$
(in millions)
 % of divisional sales $
(in millions)
 % of divisional sales
Sterling Jewelers division$157.8
 18.4 % $129.9
 16.0 %
Zale division(1)
(2.1) (0.5)% (9.8) (4.0)%
UK Jewelry division3.2
 2.0 % 1.1
 0.7 %
Other(2)
(58.1) nm
 (37.7) nm
Operating income$100.8
 7.2 % $83.5
 6.8 %
(1)In the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $5.1 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $3.0 million or 0.7% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $2.4 million from Zale Jewelry or 0.7% of sales and $0.6 million from Piercing Pagoda or 1.1% of sales. In the prior year second quarter, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $11.5 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $1.7 million or 0.7% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $1.4 million from Zale Jewelry or 0.6% of sales and $0.3 million from Piercing Pagoda or 0.9% of sales.
(2)Other includes $43.6 million of transaction-related and integration expenses in the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, which are primarily attributed to the legal settlement over appraisal rights and consulting expenses. In prior year second quarter, $30.8 million of transaction-related and integration expenses were incurred, primarily attributed to one-time transaction and severance related costs.
nm Not meaningful

In the year to date, operating income was $1.1$277.0 million, or 0.7%9.4% of sales compared to an operating loss of $0.8$234.2 million or (0.6)%10.3% of sales last year. Included in operating income were purchase accounting and transaction-related adjustments which reduced operating income by $66.5 million compared with adjustments of $50.7 million in the prior year to date period. Adjusted operating income was $343.5 million, or 11.6% of sales compared to adjusted operating income of $284.9 million or 12.4% of sales last year. The 80 basis point decrease in adjusted operating margins was due to the addition of the Zale division this year, which required incremental investment in SGA. Excluding the Zale division, the adjusted Signet operating margin would have been 14.8%, up 90 basis points compared to last year. Year to date operating income consisted of the following components:
 Year to date
 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015
 
$
(in millions)
 % of divisional sales $
(in millions)
 % of divisional sales
Sterling Jewelers division$336.0
 18.6% $296.2
 17.3 %
Zale division(1)
13.4
 1.6% (9.8) (4.0)%
UK Jewelry division3.7
 1.2% 1.1
 0.3 %
Other(2)
(76.1) nm
 (53.3) nm
Operating income$277.0
 9.4% $234.2
 10.3 %
(1)In the year to date period of Fiscal 2016, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $16.5 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $29.9 million or 3.6% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $21.9 million from Zale Jewelry or 3.0% of sales and $8.0 million from Piercing Pagoda or 6.8% of sales. In the prior year to date period, Zale division includes net operating loss impact of $11.5 million for purchase accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $1.7 million or 0.7% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $1.4 million from Zale Jewelry or 0.6% of sales and $0.3 million from Piercing Pagoda or 0.9% of sales.
(2)Other includes $50.0 million of transaction-related and integration expenses in the year to date period of Fiscal 2016, which are primarily attributed to the legal settlement over appraisal rights and consulting expenses. In prior year to date period, $39.2 million of transaction-related and integration expenses were incurred, primarily attributed to one-time transaction and severance related costs.
nm Not meaningful




56


Interest expense, net
In the second quarter, net interest expense was $11.1 million compared to $13.7 million in the prior year second quarter. The decrease was driven by the one-time write off of fees totaling $3.2 million related to the $800 million bridge facility during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, offset by interest expense associated with the $1.4 billion of debt related to financing the acquisition of Zale Corporation. This debt was outstanding for the entire second quarter compared to a partial period in the prior year second quarter.
In the year to date, net interest expense was $22.1 million compared to $15.5 million in the prior year to date period driven by the $1.4 billion of debt related to financing the acquisition of Zale Corporation.
Income before income taxes
For the second quarter, income before income taxes was up 28.5% to $89.7 million or 6.4% of sales compared to $69.8 million or 5.7% of sales in the prior year second quarter.

Zale division’s operating lossFor the year to date, income before income taxes was $9.8up 16.6% to $254.9 million or (4.0)%8.7% of sales which includes a loss of $11.5 million relatedcompared to acquisition accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $1.7$218.7 million or 0.7% of sales. The Zale division operating income included $1.4 million from Zale Jewelry or 0.6%9.6% of sales and $0.3in the prior year to date period.

Income taxes
In the second quarter, income tax expense was $27.5 million, from Piercing Pagoda or 0.9%an effective tax rate ("ETR") of sales.

The Other operating segment was an operating loss of $37.7 million30.7%, compared to $5.6$11.8 million, an ETR of 16.9%, in the prior year second quarter. The second quarter ETR was unfavorably affected by the impact of the $34.2 million appraisal rights legal settlement, which included $30.8 million related to transaction and severance costs.

is a non-deductible tax item.

In the year to date, operatingincome tax expense was $73.9 million, an ETR of 29.0% compared to $64.1 million, an ETR of 29.3%, in the prior year to date period.
The forecasted effective tax rate for the Fiscal 2016 full year remains 28% to 29%.
Net income
For the second quarter, net income was $234.2up 7.2% to $62.2 million or 10.3%4.4% of sales compared to $248.3$58.0 million or 13.3%4.7% of sales in the prior year second quarter. Adjusted net income was $102.6 million or 7.2% of adjusted sales compared to $85.6 million or 6.9% of adjusted sales in the prior year second quarter.
For the year to date, net income was up 17.1% to $181.0 million or 6.2% of sales compared to $154.6 million or 6.8% of sales in the prior year to date period. Organic operatingAdjusted net income was $283.2$232.8 million or 13.9%7.9% of sales. Year to date operating income consisted of the following components:

Sterling Jewelers division’s operating income was $296.2 million or 17.3% ofadjusted sales compared to $264.7$189.0 million or 16.6%8.2% of sales in the prior year period.

UK Jewelry division’s operating income was $1.1 million or 0.3% of sales compared to an operating loss of $4.9 million or (1.8)% of sales in the prior year period.

Zale division’s operating loss was $9.8 million or (4.0)% of sales which includes a loss of $11.5 million related to acquisition accounting adjustments. Excluding the impact from accounting adjustments, Zale division’s operating income was $1.7 million or 0.7% of sales. The Zale division operating income, excluding accounting adjustments, was comprised of $1.4 million or 0.6% of sales from Zale jewelry and $0.3 million or 0.9% of sales from Piercing Pagoda.

The Other operating segment was an operating loss of $53.3 million compared to $11.5 million in the prior year period which included $39.2 million related to transaction and severance costs.

Interest expense, net

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, net interest expense was $13.7 million compared to $1.0 million in the prior year second quarter. The increase in interest expense was driven by the addition of $1,400 million of debt financing at a weighted average interest cost of 2.6% related to the Zale acquisition. Included in interest expense was a write-off of fees of $3.2 million related to the $800 million bridge facility that was subsequently replaced with permanent financing instruments as well as $0.7 million associated with the previous credit facility. In the year to date, net interest expense was $15.5 million compared to $1.9 million in the prior year to date period with the increase driven by the same factors as those in the quarterly period in addition to $0.8 million of expense in the first quarter related to pre-acquisition financing costs.

Income before income taxes

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, income before income taxes was $69.8 million or 5.7% of sales compared $104.5 million or 11.9% in the prior year second quarter. Organic income before income taxes was $123.4 million or 12.6% of sales. In the year to date, income before income taxes was $218.7 million or 9.6% of sales compared to $246.4 million or 13.2% ofadjusted sales in the prior year to date period. Year to date organic income before income taxes was $281.5 million or 13.8% of sales.

Income taxes

In

Earnings per share
For the second quarter, of Fiscal 2015, income tax expense was $11.8 milliondiluted earnings per share were $0.78 compared to $37.1 million$0.72 in the prior year second quarter. The effective tax rate was 16.9% compared to 35.5% in the prior year second quarter. Organic income tax expense was $43.5 million with an effective tax rate of 35.2%quarter, up 8.3%. In the year to date period, income tax expense was $64.1 million, an effective tax rate 29.3% compared to $87.2 million, an effective tax rate of 35.4% in the prior year to date period. Organic income tax expense for the year to date period was $97.7 million with an effective tax rate of 34.7%.

The forecast effective tax rate for the Fiscal 2015 full year is 29.3%, which is lower than the effective tax rate of 35.1% applied as of the first quarter of Fiscal 2015. This reduction of 5.8% in Signet’s effective tax rate primarily reflects the benefit of Signet’s amended capital structure and financing arrangements utilized to fund the acquisition of Zale Corporation.

Net income

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015, net income was $58.0 million or 4.7% of sales compared to $67.4 million or 7.7% of sales in the prior year second quarter. Organic net income in the second quarter was $79.9 million or 8.2% of sales. In the year to date period, net income was $154.6 million or 6.8% of sales compared to $159.2 million or 8.5% of sales in the prior year to date period. Organic net income in the year to date period was $183.8 million or 9.0% of sales.

Earnings per share

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015,Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $0.72 compared$1.28, which included a contribution of $0.02 per share related to $0.84the Zale division, as well as the impact related to an operational change associated with extended service plans, which resulted in the prior year second quarter. Organica change in revenue recognition and impacted adjusted diluted earnings per share were $1.00, a 19.0% growth rate over the prior year second quarter.by $0.05. The weighted average diluted number of common shares outstanding was 80.279.9 million compared to 80.780.2 million in the prior year second quarter. Signet repurchased 93,664 shares in the second quarter of Fiscal 2015 under its share buyback program compared to 374,613 shares the prior year second quarter.

In

For the year to date, diluted earnings per share were $1.93$2.26 compared to $1.97$1.93 in the prior year second quarter, up 17.1%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share were $2.91, which included a contribution of $0.22 per share related to date period.the Zale division. The weighted average diluted number of common shares outstanding was 80.280.0 million compared to 81.080.2 million in the prior year to date period. Organic diluted earnings per share were $2.29, a 16.2% growth rate over the prior year to date period. Signet repurchased 220,132 shares in the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014 compared to 1,123,858 shares in the 26 weeks ended August 3, 2013.

Dividends per share

In the second quarter of Fiscal 2015,2016, dividends of $0.18$0.22 per share were approved by the Board of Directors compared to $0.15$0.18 in the second quarter of Fiscal 2014.2015. In the year to date, dividends of $0.36$0.44 per share were approved by the Board of Directors compared to $0.30$0.36 in the 26 weeks ended August 3, 2013.

prior year to date period.



57


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Set out in the

Summary cash flow
The following table below isprovides a summary of Signet’s cash flow activity for the year to date forperiods of Fiscal 20152016 and Fiscal 2014.

   26 weeks ended 
(in millions)  August 2,
2014
  August 3,
2013
 

Summary cash flow

   

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $183.9  $58.5 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (1,519.4  (52.2)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   1,303.4    (94.6
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (32.1  (88.3

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   247.6   301.0 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (0.5)  0.2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $215.0  $212.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2015:

 26 weeks ended
(in millions)August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014
Net cash provided by operating activities$210.6
 $183.9
Net cash used in investing activities(97.2) (1,519.4)
Net cash used in financing activities(147.6) 1,303.4
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(34.2) (32.1)
    
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period193.6
 247.6
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(34.2) (32.1)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents0.4
 (0.5)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$159.8
 $215.0
Operating activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $183.9$210.6 million compared to $58.5$183.9 million in the prior year comparable period. Net income decreasedincreased by $4.6$26.4 million to $181.0 million from $154.6 million from $159.2 million withand depreciation and amortization increasing $13.4increased $20.0 million to $64.5$84.5 million from $51.1$64.5 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to the Zale Division. The primary drivers of cash provided byused in operating activities were as follows:

InventoryCash provided by accounts receivable was $74.7 million as compared to $58.3 million in the prior year to date period. In the Sterling Jewelers division, credit participation was 61.6% and the average monthly collection rate was 12.0% compared to 60.0% and 12.4%, respectively, in the prior year comparable period. The decrease in the average monthly collection rate is primarily attributed to the continued shift of customers opting for regular credit terms which require lower monthly payments and no down payment as opposed to the 12-month interest free program.

Cash used for purchases of inventory relatedand inventory-related items decreased by $17.1was $28.4 million compared to an increase of $57.4$17.1 million provided in the prior year comparable period. The change in inventory cash flowsinventories is primarily attributed to the prior year balance reflecting higher inventory levels to support outletnew stores expansion of bridal programs and Signet’s strategic sourcing initiative.

Total inventory as of August 2, 2014 was $2,345.3 million compared to the year-end Fiscal 2014 balance of $1,488.0 million and prior year comparable quarter balance of $1,417.7 million. The increase in inventory from these periods is primarily attributed to acquisition of Zale division which increased inventory by $841.3. The remainder of the increase was driven in part by expansion of bridal and branded merchandise to support higher sales and new store growth.

Accrued expenses and liabilities decreased by $19.0rough diamond purchases. Accounts payable used $80.8 million compared to a decreaseuse of $57.1$28.9 million in the prior year comparable period primarily driven by increased debt-relatedthe Zale Division and timing of payments.

Total inventory as of August 1, 2015 was $2,414.2 million compared to the January 31, 2015 balance of $2,439.0 million and prior year comparable quarter balance of $2,345.3 million. The increase in inventories from the prior year comparable period is due to higher diamond inventories due primarily to more stores and rough diamond inventory.
Cash used for accrued expenses including interest, as well as increasedand other liabilities was $28.6 million compared to $19.0 million in the prior year comparable period primarily driven by salary and payroll-related liabilities, including severance.

items paid in the second quarter related to incentive compensation.


58


Investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities in the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 was $97.2 million, consisting primarily of capital additions associated with new Kay and Jared stores, store remodels and Zale division information technology infrastructure and stores. Net cash used in investing activities in the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014 was $1,519.4 million, compared to $52.2 million in the prior year comparable period. Cash used for the Zale Corporation acquisition wasconsisting primarily of $1,429.2 million. Capital expenditures increased by $36.4 million to fund the Acquisition, net of cash acquired, and $90.0 million from $53.6 million. In the Sterling Jewelers division,related to capital additions were $76.2 million compared to $48.6 million in the prior year. This increase was primarily due to timing of capital spend in Fiscal 2014 associated with the integrationnew Kay and conversion of UltraJared stores, in which the timing of the capital spend primarily occurred in the second half of the year. In the UK Jewelrystore remodels and Zale division capital additions were $4.7 million compared to $5.0 million in the prior year comparable period. Zale had capital expenditures of $8.5 million as well as capital additions in the Other operating segment of $0.6 million.

information technology infrastructure and stores.

Stores opened and closed in the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014:

   February 1,
2014
  Acquired
stores
   Openings   Logo
conversions(1)
  Closures  August 2,
2014
 

Store count:

         

Kay

   1,055    —       31    —     (10)  1,076 

Jared

   203    —      4    33   —     240 

Regional brands

   213    —      —      (33)  (9)  171 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers division

   1,471(2)   —      35    —     (19)  1,487 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zales

   —     722     3    —     (2)  723  

Gordon’s

   —     91     —      —     (7)  84  

Peoples

   —     145     —      —     (1)  144  

Mappins

   —     48     —      —     (1)  47  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zale Jewelry

   —     1,006     3    —     (11)  998  

Piercing Pagoda

   —     613     —      —     (2)  611  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zale division

   —  (2)   1,619     3    —     (13)  1,609  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

H. Samuel

   304    —      —      —     —     304  

Ernest Jones(3)

   189    —      —      —     —     189  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

UK Jewelry division

   493(2)   —      —      —     —     493  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
         
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Signet

   1,964   1,619     38    —     (32)  3,589 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

1, 2015:
 January 31, 2015 Openings Closures August 1, 2015
Store count:       
Kay1,094
  28
  (4) 1,118
Jared253
  9
  (1) 261
Regional brands157
  
 (6) 151
Sterling Jewelers division1,504
(1) 
37
  (11) 1,530
  
      
Zales716
  2
  (6) 712
Peoples144
  1
 
 145
Regional brands112
  
 (3) 109
Total Zale Jewelry972
  3
  (9) 966
Piercing Pagoda605
  
 (6) 599
Zale division1,577
(1) 
3
  (15) 1,565
  
      
H.Samuel302
  
 (1) 301
Ernest Jones196
  2
  (1) 197
UK Jewelry division498
(1) 
2
  (2) 498
  
  
  
  
Signet3,579
  42
  (28) 3,593
(1)Includes 33 stores that were converted from regional brands, which consist of 31 Jared Vaults, which operate in outlet centers, and two Jared concept test stores.
(2)
(1)
The annual net change in selling square footage for Fiscal 20142015 for Sterling Jewelers division and UK Jewelry division was 5% and (3)%2%, respectively. As the Acquisition was took placeoccurred during Fiscal 2015, the Zale division does not have a comparable prior period to show the net change in selling square footage.
(3)Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.

Planned store count changes for the remainder of Fiscal 2015:

   August 2,
2014
  Planned
openings
  Planned
closures
  Planned
January  31,
2015
 

Store count:

     

Kay

   1,076    28   (4)  1,100 

Jared

   240    13(1)    —     253 

Regional brands

   171    —     (18)  153 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sterling Jewelers division

   1,487(2)   41    (22)  1,506 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zales

   723    7    (17)  713  

Gordon’s

   84    ���     (22)  62  

Peoples

   144    1    (1)  144  

Mappins

   47    —     (2)  45  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zale Jewelery

   998    8    (42)  964  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Piercing Pagoda

   611    1    (20)  592  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Zale division

   1,609(2)   9    (62)  1,556  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

H. Samuel

   304    —     (4)  300  

Ernest Jones(3)

   189    4    (1)  192  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

UK Jewelry division

   493(2)   4    (5)  492  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
     
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Signet

   3,589   54   (89)  3,554 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

2016:
Signet anticipates opening between 90 - 110 new stores or 30 to 35 new stores net of closures in Fiscal 2016. Net selling square footage is anticipated to grow between 2% to 3% for the year driven principally by the addition of off-mall stores led by Kay and Jared. Square footage growth will be offset in part primarily due to the closure of regional store brands in North America.
(1)
Includes seven Jared The Galleria Of Jewelry store openings, as well as six Jared concept test store openings.
(2)The expected annual net change in sellingGross locationsNet locationsNet square footage for Fiscal 2015 for feet
Sterling Jewelers divisionup 55 to 65up 30 to 35up 3% to 4%
Zale division and up 30 to 35approximately flatapproximately flat
UK Jewelry division is 5%, (3)% and 0%, respectively.up 5 to 10slight increaseslight increase
(3)Includes stores selling under the Leslie Davis nameplate.


59


Financing activities
FreeNet cash flow

Free cash flow is net cash provided by operatingused in financing activities less purchases of property and equipment, net; see non-GAAP measures discussed herein. Free cash flow was $48.5 million compared to $(17.0) million in the prior year second quarter. Year to date free cash flow was $93.9 million compared to $4.9 million for the 26 weeks ended August 3, 2013.

1, 2015 was $147.6 million, comprised primarily of Financing$81.9 million cash used to repurchase approximately 629,000 shares. Additionally, approximately $32 million was used for dividend payments. Net cash provided by financing activities

Dividends

During in the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014 was $1,303.4 million, primarily due to $1,380.0 million in proceeds from debt issued (net of debt issuance costs) to fund the Company’sAcquisition, offset by $76.6 million of net cash outflows associated with dividend activity was as follows:

   Fiscal 2015  Fiscal 2014 
   Cash dividend
per share
   Total
dividends
  Cash dividend
per share
   Total
dividends
 
       (in millions)      (in millions) 

First quarter(1)

  $0.18    $14.4(2)   $0.15    $12.1  

Second quarter

  $0.18    $14.4(3)  $0.15    $12.1  

payments, share repurchases, net cash outflows associated with share based compensation plans and repayment of short-term borrowings and capital leases. Details of the major items within financing activities are discussed below:
Dividends
 August 1, 2015 August 2, 2014 
(in millions, except per share amounts)Cash dividend
per share
 Total
dividends
 Cash dividend
per share
 Total
dividends
 
First quarter(1)
$0.22
 $17.6
(2) 
$0.18
 $14.4
 
Second quarter$0.22
 $17.6
(3) 
$0.18
 $14.4
(3) 
(1)
Signet’s dividend policy results in the dividend payment date being a quarter in arrears from the declaration date. As a result, the dividend declared in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014 $0.152015 of $0.18 per share cash dividend was paid on February 27, 201426, 2015 in the aggregate amount of $12.0$14.4 million.
(2)
(2)
The first quarter Fiscal 2015 $0.182016 $0.22 per share cash dividend was paid on May 28, 201427, 2015 in the aggregate amount of $14.4 million.$17.6 million.
(3)
As of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, $17.6 million and $14.4 million, respectively, has been recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets reflecting the cash dividenddividends declared for the second quarter of Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, which has a record date of August 1, 2014 and a payment date of August 27, 2014.respectively.

Share repurchase

During the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, the

The Company’s share repurchase activity was as follows:

       26 weeks ended August 2, 2014   26 weeks ended August 3, 2013 
   Amount
authorized
   Shares
repurchased
   Amount
repurchased
  Average
repurchase
price per
share
   Shares
repurchased
   Amount
repurchased
   Average
repurchase
price per
share
 
   (in millions)       (in millions)          (in millions)     

2013 Program(1)

  $350     220,132    $22.4    $101.57     374,613    $25.0    $66.74  

2011 Program(2)

  $350     n/a     n/a    n/a     749,245     50.1     66.92  
    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

     220,132    $22.4      1,123,858    $75.1    
    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

   26 weeks ended August 1, 2015 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014
 Amount
authorized
 Shares
repurchased
 Amount
repurchased
 Average
repurchase
price per
share
 Shares
repurchased
 Amount
repurchased
 Average
repurchase
price per
share
 (in millions)   (in millions)     (in millions)  
2013 Program(1)
$350.0
 628,955
 $81.9
 $130.27
 220,132
 $22.4
 $101.57
(1)In
(1)
On June 14, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $350 million of Signet’s common shares (the “2013 Program”). The 2013 Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice. The 2013 Program had $273.0$183.7 million remaining as of August 2, 2014.1, 2015.
(2)In October 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of Signet’s common shares (the “2011 Program”), which authorization was subsequently increased to $350 million. The 2011 Program was completed as of May 4, 2013.

n/a    Not applicable.

Proceeds from exerciseissuance of share options

Common Shares

During the 26 weeks ended August 2, 2014, $2.01, 2015, $0.2 million was received for the exercise of share options pursuant to Signet’sSignet's equity compensation programs comparedprograms. This compares to $5.2$2.0 million in the 26 weeks ended August 3, 2013. Other than equity based compensation awards granted to employees and directors, Signet has not issued common shares as a financing activity for over ten years.

2, 2014.

Movement in cash and indebtedness

Net debt was $1,270.9 million as of August 1, 2015 compared to net debt of $1,195.3 million as of August 2, 2014 compared to net cash of $211.2 million as of August 3, 2013;2014; see non-GAAP measures discussed herein.

Cash and cash equivalents at August 2, 20141, 2015 were $215.0$159.8 million compared to $212.9$215.0 million as of August 3, 2013.2, 2014. Signet has significant amounts of cash and cash equivalents invested in various ‘AAA’ rated liquidity funds and at a number of financial institutions. The amount invested in each liquidity fund or at each financial institution takes into account the credit rating and size of the liquidity fund or financial institution and is invested for short-term durations.

At August 1, 2015, Signet had $1,378.5 million of outstanding debt, comprised of $398.5 million of senior unsecured notes, $600.0 million of an asset-backed securitization facility and a $380.0 million term loan facility. The term loan requires the Company to make scheduled quarterly principal payments over the five-year term. During the 26 weeks ended August 1, 2015, $10.0 million in principal payments were made. This debt was incurred during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015 to fund the Acquisition. In addition, the Company maintains a $400 million revolving credit facility, which was undrawn upon as of August 1, 2015. On May 28, 2015, Signet amended the note purchase agreement associated with the asset-backed securitization facility to extend the term of the facility by one year to May 2017 with all terms substantially the same as the original agreement.

60


At August 2, 2014, Signet had $1,400 million of outstanding debt, which was incurred to finance the acquisition of Zale Corporation.Acquisition. The debt iswas comprised of $400 million of senior unsecured notes, $600 million of an asset-backed securitization facility and a $400 million term loan facility. In connection with the issuance of the debt, Signet incurred and capitalized fees totaling $16.3 million, of which $14.4 million was paid and $1.9 million was accrued as of August 2, 2014. Additionally, the debt financing replaced commitments for an $800 million unsecured bridge facility extended to Signet to finance the transaction prior to the finalization of the current financing arrangements. Signet incurred and capitalized fees totaling $4.0 million related to this facility. During the 26 week period ended August 2, 2014, amortization expense related to capitalized fees associated with the debt and bridge facility was $0.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively. In conjunction with the financing activities,million. Signet also amended its existing $400 million revolving credit facility and extended the maturity date to 2019. AtAs of August 2, 2014, the credit facility was undrawn with no intra-period borrowings andupon. In addition, Signet entered into an $800 million 364-day unsecured bridge facility to finance the acquisition of Zale Corporation. No amounts were drawn on this bridge facility, which was replaced in the second quarter of Fiscal 2015 when the Company executed its acquisition financing described above.
The Company had stand-by letters of credit of $20.3 million. At August 3, 2013,on the Company’srevolving credit facility entered into in May 2011 was undrawn with no intra-period borrowingsof $21.9 million and stand-by letters$20.3 million as of August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively, that reduce remaining availability under the revolving credit of $9.5 million.

facility.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

Signet’s contractual obligations and commitments atas of August 2, 20141, 2015 and the effects such obligations and commitments are expected to have on Signet’s liquidity and cash flows in future periods have not changed materially outside the ordinary course from those disclosed in Signet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2014,January 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014. In addition to those previously disclosed on Form 10-K, in May 2014, the Company issued long-term debt in connection with its acquisition of Zale Corporation. Zale also has existing contractual obligations consisting of capital lease obligations, operating leases, an IT operations services agreement and other long-term liabilities. The following table provides the payments due by period for only these incremental obligations and commitments as of May 29, 2014.

New contractual obligations as of May 29, 2014

   Less than
one year(1)
   Between one and
three  years
   Between three
and five  years
   More than
five years
   Other   Total 
(in millions)                        

Long-term debt obligations (excluding capital
leases)
(2)

  $20.8    $637.6    $197.6    $733.4    $—     $1,589.4  

Operating lease obligations(3)

   124.1     259.8     150.0     163.0     —      696.9  

Capital lease obligations

   0.7     1.2     —      —      —      1.9  

Operations services agreement(4)

   4.9     10.6     —      —      —      15.5  

Other long-term liabilities(5)

   —      —      —      —      5.8    5.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $150.5    $909.2    $347.6    $896.4    $  5.8    $2,309.5  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Amounts included in this column represent obligations from the period May 29, 2014 through January 31, 2015.
(2)Includes principal payments on all long-term obligations and interest payments on fixed-rate obligations only. Contractual interest payments on variable-rate obligations and commitment fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility have been excluded since the payments can fluctuate due to various circumstances.
(3)Like the other Signet divisions, Zale operating lease obligations relate to minimum payments due under store lease arrangements. Most store operating leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance fees. Real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance fees were approximately 35% of base rentals for Fiscal 2014. These are not included in the table above. Some operating leases also require additional payments based on a percentage of sales.
(4)The operations services agreement is with a third party for the management of client server systems, local area networks operations, wide area network management and technical support.
(5)Other long-term liabilities reflect loss reserves related to credit insurance services provided by insurance subsidiaries. We have reflected these payments under “Other”, as the timing of the future payments is dependent on the actual processing of the claims.

Not included in the table above are obligations under employment agreements and ordinary course purchase orders for merchandise.

26, 2015.

SEASONALITY

Signet’s sales are seasonal, with the first quarter slightly exceeding 20% of annual sales, the second and third quarters each approximating 20% and the fourth quarter accounting for almost 40% of annual sales, with December being by far the most important month of the year. Sales made inThe “Holiday Season” consists of results for the months of November and December are known as the “Holiday Season.” Due to sales leverage, Signet’s operating income is even more seasonal; aboutDecember. As a result, approximately 45% to 55% of Signet’s annual operating income normally occurs in the fourth quarter, comprised of nearly all of the UK Jewelry and Zale divisions’ annual operating income and about 40% to 45% of the Sterling Jewelers division’s annual operating income.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation

Critical accounting policies covering areas of greater complexity that are subject to the exercise of judgment due to the reliance on key estimates are listed below. A comprehensive listing of Signet's critical accounting policies are set forth in the financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant judgments and estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the financial statements. In many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. Management maintains a process to review the application of Signet’s accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the many estimates that are required to prepare the financial statements of a multinational organization. However, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information. There have been no material changes to the policies and estimates as discussed in Signet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2014, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014 except as noted below:

Item 1.

Revenue recognition

Extended service plans and lifetime warranty agreements

SignetThe Company recognizes revenue related to lifetime warranty sales in proportion to when the expected costs will be incurred. The deferral period for lifetime warranty sales in each division is determined from patterns of claims costs, including estimates of future claims costs expected to be incurred. Management reviews the trends in claims to assess whether changes are required to the revenue and cost recognition rates utilized. A significant change in estimates related to the time period or pattern in which warranty-related costs are expected to be incurred could adverselymaterially impact revenues. All direct costs associated with the sale of these plans are deferred and amortized in proportion to the revenue recognized and disclosed as either other current assets or other assets.

The Sterling Jewelers division sells extended service plans, where it is obliged, subject to certain conditions, to perform repair work over the lifetimelife of the product. Revenue from the sale of these lifetime extended service plans is recognized consistent with the estimated pattern of claim costs expected to be incurred by the Company in connection with performing under the extended service plan obligations. Based on an evaluation of historical claims data, management currently estimates that substantially all claims will be incurred within 17 years of the sale of the warranty contract.
In the second quarter of Fiscal 2016, an operational change related to the Sterling Jewelers division's extended service plans associated with ring sizing was made to further align Zale and Sterling ESP policies. As a result, revenue from the sale of these lifetime extended service plans in the Sterling Jewelers division is deferred and recognized over 1417 years for all plans, with approximately 45%57% of revenue recognized within the first two years.

years for plans sold on or after May 2, 2015 and 42% of revenue recognized within the first two years for plans sold prior to May 2, 2015 (January 31, 2015: 45%; August 2, 2014: 45%).

The Zale division also sells extended service plans. Zale Jewelry customers are offered lifetime warranties on certain products that cover sizing and breakage with an option to purchase theft protection for a two-year period. Revenue from the sale of lifetime extended service plans is deferred and recognized over 10 years.years, with approximately 69% of revenue recognized within the first two years (January 31, 2015: 69%). Revenues related to the optional theft protection are deferred and recognized over the two-year contract period on a straight-line basis. Zale Jewelry customers are also offered a two-year watch warranty and a one-year warranty that covers breakage. Piercing Pagoda customers are also offered a one-year warranty that covers breakage. Revenue from the two-year watch warranty and one-year breakage warranty is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective contract terms.

Goodwill

Goodwill representsThe Sterling Jewelers division also sells a Jewelry Replacement Plan (“JRP”). The JRP is designed to protect customers from damage or defects of purchased merchandise for a period of three years. If the excess ofpurchased merchandise is defective or becomes damaged under normal use in that time period, the purchase price of acquisitionsitem will be replaced. JRP revenue is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the Company’s interest in the fair valueperiod of the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired. Goodwill is recorded by the Company’s reporting units based on the acquisitions made by each. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment and is required to be tested at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value. The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the Sterling Jewelers reporting unit is the last dayexpected claims costs.




61

Table of the fourth quarter. The annual testing date for goodwill allocated to the reporting units associated with the Zale Corporation acquisition and the Other reporting unit is May 31.

The Company may elect to perform a qualitative assessment for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value. If a qualitative assessment is not performed, or if as a result of a qualitative assessment it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then the reporting unit’s fair value is compared to its carrying value. Fair value is determined through the income approach using discounted cash flow models or market-based methodologies. Significant estimates used in these discounted cash flow models include: the weighted average cost of capital; long-term growth rates; expected changes to selling prices, direct costs and profitability of the business; and working capital requirements. Management estimates discount rates using post-tax rates that reflect assessments of the time value of money and Company-specific risks. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, the Company determines the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, the Company recognizes an impairment charge equal to the difference.

See Note 20 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of the goodwill recorded by the Company during the second quarter of Fiscal 2015. There have been no goodwill impairment losses recorded during the fiscal periods presented in the condensed consolidated income statements. If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required. See Note 10 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset are less than the carrying amount, the Company recognizes an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset.

Intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment each year in the fourth quarter and may be reviewed more frequently if certain events occur or circumstances change. First, pursuant to ASU No. 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment”, the Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company estimates the fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset, compares that value with its carrying amount and records an impairment charge, if any.

If future economic conditions are different than those projected by management, future impairment charges may be required. See Note 10 for additional information on intangible assets.

Capital Lease Obligations

In the Zale division, capital leases are entered into related to vehicles for field management. The vehicles are included in property, plant and equipment in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated over a four-year life. Capital leases, net of accumulated depreciation, included in property, plant and equipment as of August 2, 2014 totaled $1.7 million. The Acquisition occurred on May 29, 2014, and therefore amounts are not included as of February 1, 2014 or August 3, 2013.

ContentsITEM��


ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Signet is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and precious metal prices, which could affect its consolidated financial position, earnings and cash flows. Signet manages its exposure to market risk through its regular operating and financing activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Signet uses derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes.

As certain of the UK Jewelry division’s purchases are denominated in US dollars and its net cash flows are in British pounds, Signet’s policy is to enter into forward foreign currency forward exchange contracts and foreign currency swaps to manage the exposure to the US dollar. Signet also hedges a significant portion of forecasted merchandise purchases using commodity forward contracts. Additionally, the Zale division occasionally enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to manage the currency fluctuations associated with purchases for our Canadian operations. These contracts are entered into with large, reputable financial institutions, thereby minimizing the credit exposure from our counterparties.

Signet has significant amounts of cash and cash equivalents invested at several financial institutions. The amount invested at each financial institution takes into account the long-term credit rating and size of the financial institution. However, with the current financial environment and the possible instability of financial institutions, Signet cannot be assured that it will not experience any losses on these balances. The interest rates earned on cash and cash equivalents will fluctuate in line with short-term interest rates.

Signet’s market risk profile as of August 2, 20141, 2015 has not materially changed since February 1, 2014.January 31, 2015. The market risk profile as of February 1, 2014January 31, 2015 is disclosed in Signet’s Fiscal 20142015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014.

26, 2015.


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of August 2, 2014.

1, 2015.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The acquisition of Zale Corporation was significant to the Company and was consummated effective May 29, 2014. Upon consummation, Zale became a consolidated subsidiary. The Company currently expects to include Zale within management’s annual assessment of internal control over financial reporting for

During the year ending January 31, 2015; however,second quarter of Fiscal 2016, there were no changes in the Company intends to take a period of time to fully incorporate Zale’s operations into its evaluation ofCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. In connection with the foregoing evaluation by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, other than as noted above, no changes were identified in the Company’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended August 2, 2014,reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


62



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information regarding legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from Note 1721 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part I Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of Signet’s Fiscal 20142015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014, except that the risk factors set forth below include any material changes to, and supersede, to the extent included below, the description of, the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of Signet’s Fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, the risk factor entitled “If Signet’s financing for the transaction becomes unavailable, the transaction may not be completed and we may be in breach of the Merger Agreement” disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of Signet’s Fiscal 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K is hereby deleted.

Fluctuations in the availability and pricing of commodities, particularly polished diamonds and gold, which account for the majority of Signet’s merchandise costs, could adversely impact its earnings and cash availability.

The jewelry industry generally is affected by fluctuations in the price and supply of diamonds, gold and, to a lesser extent, other precious and semi-precious metals and stones. In particular, diamonds account for about 47% of Signet’s merchandise costs, and gold about 15% in Fiscal 2014.

In Fiscal 2014, polished diamond prices experienced a single digit percentage increase when compared to Fiscal 2013 levels, unlike as had occurred in prior years. Industry forecasts indicate that over the medium and longer term, the demand for diamonds will probably increase faster than the growth in supply, particularly as a result of growing demand in countries such as China and India. Therefore, the cost of diamonds is anticipated to rise over time, although fluctuations in price are likely to continue to occur. The mining, production and inventory policies followed by major producers of rough diamonds can have a significant impact on diamond prices, as can the inventory and buying patterns of jewelry retailers and other parties in the supply chain.

While jewelry manufacturing is the major final demand for gold, management believes that the cost of gold is predominantly impacted by investment transactions which have resulted in significant volatility and overall increases in gold cost over the past several years followed by somewhat of a decline in Fiscal 2014. Signet’s cost of merchandise and potentially its earnings may be adversely impacted by investment market considerations that cause the price of gold to significantly escalate.

The availability of diamonds is significantly influenced by the political situation in diamond producing countries, including the impact of current and potential new sanctions on Russia, and by the Kimberley Process, an inter-governmental agreement for the international trading of rough diamonds. Until acceptable alternative sources of diamonds can be developed, any sustained interruption in the supply of diamonds from significant producing countries, or to the trading in rough and polished diamonds which could occur as a result of disruption to the Kimberley Process, could adversely affect Signet, as well as the retail jewelry market as a whole. In 2012, the Kimberley Process, chaired by the United States, initiated a process to review ways to strengthen and reform the Kimberley Process, including reviewing the definition of a conflict diamond. In January 2013, South Africa became the chair, and the review process was expected to continue; however, no reform efforts were achieved. In 2014, the Kimberley Process is being chaired by China, which will be followed by Angola in26, 2015. In addition, the current Kimberley Process decision making procedure is dependent on reaching a consensus among member governments, which can result in the protracted resolution of issues, and there is little expectation of significant reform over the long-term. The impact of this review process on the supply of diamonds, and consumers’ perception of the diamond supply chain, is unknown. In addition to the Kimberley Process, the supply of diamonds to the US is also impacted by certain governmental trade sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe.

The possibility of constraints in the supply of diamonds of a size and quality Signet requires to meet its merchandising requirements may result in changes in Signet’s supply chain practices, for example its rough sourcing initiative. In addition, Signet may from time to time choose to hold more inventory, to purchase raw materials at an earlier stage in the supply chain or enter into commercial agreements of a nature that it currently does not use. Such actions could require the investment of cash and/or additional management skills. Such actions may not result in the expected returns and other projected benefits anticipated by management.

An inability to increase retail prices to reflect higher commodity costs would result in lower profitability. Historically jewelry retailers have been able, over time, to increase prices to reflect changes in commodity costs. However, in general, particularly sharp increases in commodity costs may result in a time lag before increased commodity costs are fully reflected in retail prices. As Signet uses an average cost inventory methodology, volatility in its commodity costs may also result in a time lag before cost increases are reflected in retail prices. There is no certainty that such price increases will be sustainable, so downward pressure on gross margins and earnings may occur. In addition, any sustained increases in the cost of commodities could result in the need to fund a higher level of inventory or changes in the merchandise available to the customer.

In August 2012, the SEC, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, issued final rules, which require annual disclosure and reporting on the source and use of certain minerals, including gold, from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. The gold supply chain is complex and, while management believes that the rules currently cover less than 1% of annual worldwide gold production (based upon recent estimates), the final rules require Signet and other jewelry retailers and manufacturers that file with the SEC to make specified country of origin inquiries of our suppliers, and otherwise to exercise reasonable due diligence in determining the country of origin and certain other information relating to any of the statutorily designated minerals (gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten), that are used in products sold by Signet in the US and elsewhere. On May 30, 2014, Signet filed with the SEC its Form Specialized Disclosure (SD) and accompanying Conflict Minerals Report in accordance with the SEC’s rules, which together describe our country of origin inquiries and due diligence measures relating to the source and chain of custody of those designated minerals Signet deemed necessary to the functionality or production of our products, the results of those activities and our related determinations with respect to the calendar year ended December 31, 2013.

Compliance with the SEC’s conflict minerals disclosure rules to date has not and will not likely add significantly to Signet’s compliance costs, and management does not expect any potential future increase in such costs to be material. There may be reputational risks associated with the potential negative response of our customers and other stakeholders to future disclosures by Signet in the event that, due to the complexity of the global supply chain, Signet is unable to sufficiently verify the origin of the relevant metals. Also, if future responses to verification requests by suppliers of any of the covered minerals used in our products are inadequate or adverse, Signet’s ability to obtain merchandise may be impaired and our compliance costs may increase. The final rules also cover tungsten and tin, which are contained in a small proportion of items that are sold by Signet. It is possible that other minerals, such as diamonds, could be subject to similar rules.

Additional indebtedness relating to the Zale Corporation Acquisition reduces the availability of cash to fund other business initiatives and the expected benefits from the acquisition may not be fully realized.

Signet’s additional indebtedness to fund the acquisition of Zale Corporation has significantly increased Signet’s outstanding debt. This additional indebtedness requires us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow to servicing this debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund other business initiatives, including dividends and share repurchases. Significant changes to Signet’s financial condition as a result of global economic changes or difficulties in the integration or execution of strategies of the newly acquired business, and the diversion of significant management time and resources towards integrating the business and operations of Zale Corporation may affect our ability to obtain the expected benefits from the transaction or to satisfy the financial covenants included in the terms of the financing arrangements.

Signet has incurred transaction-related costs in connection with the transaction.

We have incurred a number of substantial non-recurring transaction-related costs associated with completing the transaction, combining the operations of the two companies and achieving desired synergies. Non-recurring transaction costs include, but are not limited to, fees paid to legal, financial and accounting advisors, regulatory filing fees and printing costs. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of our and Zale Corporation’s businesses. There can be no assurance that the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the two businesses, as well as the elimination of certain duplicative costs, will offset the incremental transaction-related costs over time. Thus, any net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, the long term, or at all.

Although we anticipate that Zale will continue to operate as a separate brand within Signet, failure to successfully combine Signet’s and Zale Corporation’s businesses in the expected time frame may adversely affect the future results of the combined company.

The success of the transaction will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies from combining our and Zale Corporation’s businesses. To realize these anticipated benefits, the businesses must be successfully combined. If the combined company is not able to achieve these objectives, or is not able to achieve these objectives on a timely basis, the anticipated benefits of the transaction may not be realized fully or at all. In addition, the actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, which could reduce the anticipated benefits of the transaction. These integration difficulties could result in declines in the market value of our common stock.

A consolidated lawsuit on behalf of a purported class of stockholders is pending against Zale Corporation, Signet, the members of Zale Corporation’s board of directors and Signet’s merger subsidiary, challenging the transaction, and an unfavorable judgment or ruling in this lawsuit could result in substantial costs.

In connection with the Zale Corporation acquisition, a consolidated lawsuit on behalf of a purported class of former Zale Corporation stockholders is pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The lawsuit names as defendants Zale Corporation, Signet, the members of the board of directors of Zale Corporation, and Signet’s merger subsidiary. In addition, several former Zale Corporation stockholders have filed petitions for appraisal in the Delaware Court of Chancery. Additional lawsuits may be filed against Zale Corporation and Signet, our merger subsidiary and Zale Corporation’s directors related to the transaction. The defense or settlement of, or an unfavorable judgment in, any lawsuit or claim could result in substantial costs and could adversely affect the combined company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

If our goodwill becomes impaired, we may be required to record significant charges to earnings.

We have a substantial amount of goodwill on our balance sheet as a result of the Zale Corporation acquisition. We review goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Application of the impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units and determination of fair value of each reporting unit. There is a risk that a significant deterioration in a key estimate or assumption or a less significant deterioration to a combination of assumptions or the sale of a part of a reporting unit could result in an impairment charge in the future, which could have a significant adverse impact on our reported earnings.

For further information on our testing for goodwill impairment, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” under Part I, Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Repurchases of Equity Securities

equity securities

The following table contains the Company’s repurchases of equity securities in the second quarter of Fiscal 2015:

Period

  Total
number of
shares
purchased(1)
   Average
price  paid
per share
   Total
number  of
shares
purchased
as part of
publicly
announced
plans or
programs(2)
   Maximum
number (or
approximate
dollar value)
of shares that
may yet be
purchased
under the
plans or
programs
 

May 4, 2014 to May 31, 2014

   94,246   $100.88    93,664   $273,037,569 

June 1, 2014 to June 28, 2014

   —     $—      —     $273,037,569 

June 29, 2014 to August 2, 2014

   4,614   $103.11    —     $273,037,569 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total

   98,860    $100.98     93,664    $273,037,569  

2016:
PeriodTotal number of shares
purchased
 Average price paid per share 
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs(1)
 Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
May 3, 2015 to May 30, 2015131,602
 $134.93
 131,602
 $225,892,330
May 31, 2015 to June 27, 201593,350
 $131.14
 93,350
 $213,650,075
June 28, 2015 to August 1, 2015243,705
 $123.10
 243,705
 $183,650,103
Total468,657
 $128.03
 468,657
 $183,650,103
(1)Includes 5,196 shares of restricted stock repurchased in connection with employee tax withholding obligations under the Company’s share-based compensation plans, which are not purchases under any publicly announced share repurchase program.
(2)
(1)
On June 14, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the 2013 Program to repurchase of up to $350 million of Signet’s common shares.shares (the “2013 Program”). The 2013 Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice.notice


63


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Number

 

Number
Description of Exhibits

(1)
3.1* Amended and Restated Bye-laws of Signet Jewelers Limited.
4.1*Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2014, among Signet UK Finance plc, the guarantors party thereto, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.
10.1†Separation Agreement dated June 27, 2014 between Signet Jewelers Limited and Ronald W. Ristau (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 3, 2014).
10.2*Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 9, 2014, by and among Signet Jewelers Limited, as Parent, Signet Group Limited, Signet Group Treasury Services Inc. and Sterling Jewelers Inc. as borrowers, the additional borrowers from time to time party thereto, the financial institutions from time to time party thereto as lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and the other agents party thereto.
31.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.


(1)
Signet hereby agrees to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of long-term debt under which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Signet and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis that is not filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to our annual and quarterly reports.
*Filed herewith.
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURE


64


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 SIGNET JEWELERS LIMITED
 (Registrant)
Signet Jewelers Limited
Date:September 10, 20143, 2015 By: 

/s/ Michele L. Santana

 Name: Michele L. Santana
  Title:
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

64




65