Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 7,548,358 at ~~October 31, 2014.~~


	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	21,179	$	30,004		$	24,193		$	24,656
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		6,932		11,846			6,813			6,770
Federal funds sold		6,100		9,460			8,625
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale		350,825		299,715			280,300			339,586
Held-to-maturity: Fair value September 30, 2014, $15,516; December 31, 2013, $17,175		15,264		17,295
Held-to-maturity: Fair value March 31, 2015, $14,729; December 31, 2014, $15,215							14,172			14,665

Total investment securities		366,089		317,010			294,472			354,251
Loans held for sale		2,961		1,757			3,101			3,486
Loans, net		1,179,942		1,176,617			1,237,168			1,209,894
Less: allowance for loan losses		10,171		8,651			10,803			10,338

Net loans		1,169,771		1,167,966			1,226,365			1,199,556
Premises and equipment, net		25,692		26,119			26,117			25,433
Accrued interest receivable		5,381		5,866			4,922			5,580
Goodwill		63,370		63,370			63,370			63,370
Intangible assets		5,826		6,835			5,197			5,501
Other assets		51,477		47,988			50,786			53,066

Total assets	$	1,724,778	$	1,688,221		$	1,713,961		$	1,741,669

Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	302,279	$	279,942		$	305,037		$	313,498
Interest-bearing		1,123,349		1,099,565			1,111,241			1,112,060

Total deposits		1,425,628		1,379,507			1,416,278			1,425,558
Short-term borrowings		6,514		22,052						19,557
Long-term debt		34,020		36,743			32,318			33,140
Accrued interest payable		597		723			460			574
Other liabilities		11,950		10,404			15,447			16,061

Total liabilities		1,478,709		1,449,429			1,464,503			1,494,890

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock: par value $2.00, authorized 25,000,000 shares; September 30, 2014, issued 7,548,358 shares; December 31, 2013, issued 7,806,789 shares		15,097		15,614
Common stock: par value $2.00, authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 7,548,358 shares							15,097			15,097
Capital surplus		140,150		146,109			140,232			140,214
Retained earnings		90,252		84,008			95,000			92,297
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		570		(698	)
Less: treasury stock, at cost: December 31, 2013, 253,845 shares				6,241
Accumulated other comprehensive loss							(871	)		(829	)

Total stockholders’ equity		246,069		238,792			249,458			246,779

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,724,778	$	1,688,221		$	1,713,961		$	1,741,669


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	2014			2013			2014			2013
September 30,
For the Three Months Ended March 31,													2015			2014
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans:
Taxable	$	13,876		$	7,213		$	41,035		$	21,819		$	13,340		$	14,000
Tax-exempt		465			396			1,607			1,210			559			635
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
Taxable		1,007			386			2,877			1,239			900			928
Tax-exempt		816			658			2,462			1,927			805			829
Dividends		2			22			32			57			9			16
Interest on interest-bearing deposits in other banks		10			18			29			68			8			10
Interest on federal funds sold		16						64						7			14

Total interest income		16,192			8,693			48,106			26,320			15,628			16,432

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		1,354			647			4,125			1,968			1,268			1,357
Interest on short-term borrowings		9			6			67			17			8			34
Interest on long-term debt		279			299			864			961			259			296

Total interest expense		1,642			952			5,056			2,946			1,535			1,687

Net interest income		14,550			7,741			43,050			23,374			14,093			14,745
Provision for loan losses		666			525			2,724			1,325			750			857

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		13,884			7,216			40,326			22,049			13,343			13,888

Noninterest income:
Service charges, fees and commissions		1,634			1,006			4,815			3,426			1,612			1,624
Merchant services income		1,002			1,174			2,784			3,123			790			894
Commission and fees on fiduciary activities		575			487			1,690			1,281			459			567
Wealth management income		217			130			569			320			205			187
Mortgage banking income		142			80			434			246			222			99
Life insurance investment income		109			117			565			356			189			189
Net gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale		701			33			861			158			832

Total noninterest income		4,380			3,027			11,718			8,910			4,309			3,560

Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits expense		4,754			3,340			14,883			10,415			5,233			5,168
Net occupancy and equipment expense		2,020			685			6,080			2,187			2,468			1,733
Merchant services expense		662			740			1,722			1,947			533			565
Amortization of intangible assets		334			55			1,010			175			305			343
Acquisition related expense		109			220			1,725			225						608
Other expenses		3,205			2,325			9,190			6,397			2,555			2,870

Total noninterest expense		11,084			7,365			34,610			21,346			11,094			11,287

Income before income taxes		7,180			2,878			17,434			9,613			6,558			6,161
Income tax expense		1,944			392			4,169			1,762			1,514			1,463

Net income		5,236			2,486			13,265			7,851			5,044			4,698

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale		(825	)		(20	)		2,811			(3,240	)
Unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale														767			2,394
Reclassification adjustment for net gain on sales included in net income		(701	)		(33	)		(861	)		(158	)		(832	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,526	)		(53	)		1,950			(3,398	)		(65	)		2,394
Income tax expense (benefit) related to other comprehensive income (loss)		(534	)		(18	)		682			(1,155	)		(23	)		838

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes		(992	)		(35	)		1,268			(2,243	)		(42	)		1,556

Comprehensive income	$	4,244		$	2,451		$	14,533		$	5,608		$	5,002		$	6,254

Per share data:
Net income:
Basic	$	0.70		$	0.56		$	1.76		$	1.76		$	0.67		$	0.62
Diluted	$	0.70		$	0.56		$	1.76		$	1.76		$	0.67		$	0.62
Average common shares outstanding:
Basic		7,548,358			4,473,846			7,548,983			4,469,480			7,548,358			7,550,253
Diluted		7,548,358			4,473,846			7,566,456			4,469,480			7,548,358			7,580,480
Dividends declared	$	0.31		$	0.31		$	0.93		$	0.93		$	0.31		$	0.31


																			Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance, January 1, 2015																			$	15,097		$	140,214		$	92,297		$	(829	)				$	246,779
Net income																										5,044									5,044
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes																													(42	)					(42	)
Dividends declared: $0.31 per share																										(2,341	)								(2,341	)
Stock based compensation																							18												18

Balance, March 31, 2015																			$	15,097		$	140,232		$	95,000			(871	)				$	249,458
	Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance, January 1, 2014	$	15,614		$	146,109		$	84,008		$	(698	)	$	(6,241	)	$	238,792		$	15,614		$	146,109		$	84,008		$	(698	)	$	(6,241	)	$	238,792
Net income								13,265									13,265									4,698									4,698
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes											1,268						1,268												1,556						1,556
Dividends declared: $0.93 per share								(7,021	)								(7,021	)
Dividends declared: $0.31 per share																										(2,341	)								(2,341	)
Shares retired: 3,386 shares		(7	)		(102	)											(109	)		(7	)		(102	)											(109	)
Reissuance under option plan: 600 shares					28									11			39						28									11			39
Repurchase and held: 1,800 shares														(70	)		(70	)														(70	)		(70	)
Retirement of stock options					(95	)											(95	)
Retirement of treasury shares		(510	)		(5,790	)								6,300

Balance, September 30, 2014	$	15,097		$	140,150		$	90,252		$	570		$			$	246,069
Balance, March 31, 2014																			$	15,607		$	146,035		$	86,365		$	858		$	(6,300	)	$	242,565

Balance, January 1, 2013	$	8,935		$	40,003		$	83,798		$	(290	)				$	132,446
Net income								7,851									7,851
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes											(2,243	)					(2,243	)
Dividends declared: $0.93 per share								(4,132	)								(4,132	)
Stock based compensation					51												51

Balance, September 30, 2013	$	8,935		$	40,054		$	87,517		$	(2,533	)				$	133,973


For the Nine Months Ended September 30	2014			2013
For the Three Months Ended March 31,							2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	13,265		$	7,851		$	5,044		$	4,698
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of premises and equipment		1,322			611			388			574
Amortization of deferred loan costs		171						132			22
Amortization of intangibles		1,009						305			343
Net accretion of purchase accounting adjustments on tangible assets		(2,683	)		(210	)		(292	)		(864	)
Provision for loan losses		2,724			1,325			750			857
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned		(60	)		(57	)		(30	)		(22	)
Net loss on disposal of equipment		63									63
Loans originated for sale								(5,300	)		(2,169	)
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale								5,907			2,104
Net loss (gain) on sale of loans originated for sale								(222	)		6
Net amortization of investment securities		3,230			321			1,022			1,043
Net gain on sale of investment securities		(861	)		(158	)		(832	)
Life insurance investment income		(592	)		(70	)		(189	)		(189	)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)					83
Deferred income tax benefit								(142	)
Stock based compensation		11			51			18
Net change in:
Loans held for sale		(1,204	)
Accrued interest receivable		485			221			658			500
Other assets		(3,398	)		1,115			710			(1,962	)
Accrued interest payable		(126	)		(214	)		(114	)		(113	)
Other liabilities		1,546			1,270			(452	)		2,239

Net cash provided by operating activities		14,902			12,139			7,361			7,130

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale		15,389			15,298			50,981			60
Proceeds from repayments of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		32,022			3,718			9,835			12,634
Held-to-maturity		1,989			4,637			482			675
Purchases of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		(98,898	)		(10,048	)		(1,774	)		(13,841	)
Held-to-maturity					(6,874	)
Net redemption of restricted equity securities								1,555
Net increase in lending activities		(3,341	)		(34,001	)		(27,689	)		(798	)
Proceeds from life insurance					1,227
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,059	)		(297	)		(1,097	)		(122	)
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment		25
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		409			760			338			193

Net cash used in investing activities		(53,464	)		(25,580	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities								32,631			(1,199	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits		46,939			6,352
Net (decrease) increase in deposits								(9,081	)		24,855
Repayment of long-term debt		(2,682	)		(10,426	)		(808	)		(890	)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		(15,538	)		2,125			(19,557	)		487
Redemption of common stock		(70	)								(70	)
Retirement of stock options		(95	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(70	)								(70	)
Cash dividends paid		(7,021	)		(4,132	)		(2,341	)		(2,341	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		21,463			(6,081	)		(31,787	)		21,971

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(17,099	)		(19,522	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								8,205			27,902
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		51,310			47,844			31,426			51,310

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	34,211		$	28,322		$	39,631		$	79,212

Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	5,182		$	3,160
Income taxes		3,100		$	2,050
Noncash items:
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned		541
Retirement of treasury shares		6,300
Non-cash activity resulting from the Penseco transaction:
Fair value of assets acquired:
Loans, net		1,900
Premises and equipment		(76	)
Core deposit intangibles		(1,009	)
Other assets
Fair value of liabilities assumed:
Deposits		818
FHLB advances	$	41
Other liabilities

Peoples Financial Services Corp., a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania, provides a full range of financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Peoples Security Bank and Trust Company (“Peoples Bank”), including its subsidiaries, Peoples Advisors, LLC and Penseco Realty, Inc. (collectively, the “Company” or “Peoples”). On November 30, 2013, Penseco Financial Services Corporation, a financial holding company incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania (“Penseco”), merged with and into Peoples Financial Services Corp., with Peoples Financial Services Corp. being the surviving corporation (the “Merger”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 28, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”). In connection with the Merger, on December 1, 2013, Penseco’s former banking subsidiary, Penn Security Bank and Trust Company, merged with and into Peoples Neighborhood Bank (the “Bank Merger”), and the resulting institution adopted the name Peoples Security Bank and Trust Company. The Company services its retail and commercial customers through twenty-six full-service community banking offices located within the Lackawanna, Lehigh, Luzerne, Monroe, Susquehanna, Wayne and Wyoming Counties of ~~Northeastern~~ Pennsylvania and Broome County of New York.

The aforementioned merger between the Company and Penseco was accounted for as a reverse acquisition whereby Penseco was treated as the acquirer for accounting and reporting purposes. As a result, the historical financial information prior to the merger date included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes as reported in this Form 10-Q is that of Penseco. The number of shares issued and outstanding and the amount of common stock and capital surplus in 2013 periods were retroactively adjusted to reflect the equivalent number of shares issued by the Company in the merger.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP’) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior-period amounts are reclassified when necessary to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have any effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. Certain disclosures related to impaired and nonaccrual loans have been revised for December 31, 2013. Such revisions were not material and had no effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The operating results and financial position of the Company for the ~~nine~~three months ended and as of ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial position that may be expected in the future.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates that are particularly susceptible to material change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial instruments, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of deferred tax assets, determination of other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities, ~~and~~ impairment of ~~goodwill.~~goodwill and fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For additional information and disclosures required under GAAP, reference is made to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

In ~~August 2014,~~January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~2014-13, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring~~2015-01 which eliminates the ~~Financial Assets~~requirement in Subtopic 225-20 to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, and if so, to separately present the ~~Financial Liabilities~~item in the income statement net of ~~a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity.” The amendments in this Update address the measurement mismatch that often results~~tax, after income from the difference between the fair value of the financial assets and financial liabilities of a consolidated collateralized financing entity (“CFE”). The ASU provides an option for measuring the financial assets and financial liabilities of a CFE to eliminate that difference under certain conditions. Under that option, a reporting entity should use the more observable of the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of a CFE to measure both. If an entity does not elect the measurement alternative, it should continue applying the measurement guidance in Topic 820 to assets and liabilitiescontinuing operations. Items that are ~~carried at fair value~~either unusual in nature or infrequently occurring will continue to be reported as a separate component of income from continuing operations. Alternatively, these amounts may still be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. ~~This~~The same requirement has been expanded to include items that are both unusual and infrequent, i.e., they should be separately presented as a component of income from continuing operations or disclosed in the footnotes. The ASU is effective for ~~annual periods,~~all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those ~~annual periods,~~fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of ASU ~~2014-13~~2015-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.

In ~~August 2014,~~February 2015, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014-14, “Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings~~2015-02 which changes the consolidation analysis for all reporting entities. The changes primarily affect the consolidation of limited partnerships and their equivalents (e.g., limited liability corporations), as well as structured vehicles such as collateralized debt obligations. The ASU simplifies U.S. GAAP by ~~Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Classification~~eliminating entity specific consolidation guidance for limited partnerships. It also revises other aspects of ~~Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.”~~the consolidation analysis, including how kick-out rights, fee arrangements and related parties are assessed. The amendments ~~in this Update address~~rescind the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement 167 for certain investment funds and replace it with a practice issue related to the classification of certain foreclosed residential and nonresidential mortgage loans that are either fully or partially guaranteed under government programs. Specifically, creditors should reclassify loans that meet certain conditions to other receivables upon foreclosure, rather than reclassifying them to other real estate owned.permanent scope exception for money market funds. The ~~separate other receivable recorded upon foreclosure is to be measured based on the amount of the loan balance, principal and interest, the creditor expects to recover from the guarantor. This~~ ASU is effective for ~~annual periods,~~public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those ~~annual periods,~~fiscal years, beginning after December 15, ~~2014.~~2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU ~~2014-14~~2015-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and their related tax effects are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The accumulated other comprehensive ~~income (loss)~~loss included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets relates to net unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale and benefit plan adjustments.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive ~~income (loss)~~loss included in stockholders’ equity at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 is as follows:

Other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~ is as follows:


Three months ended September 30	2014			2013
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale	$	(825	)	$	(20	)
Three months ended March 31							2015			2014
Unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale							$	767		$	2,394
Net gain on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale (1)		(701	)		(33	)		(832	)

Other comprehensive income (loss) gain before taxes		(1,526	)		(53	)		(65	)		2,394
Income tax expense (benefit)		(534	)		(18	)
Income taxes expense (benefit)								(23	)		838

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(992	)	$	(35	)	$	(42	)	$	1,556


Nine months ended September 30	2014			2013
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale	$	2,811		$	(3,240	)
Net gain on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale (1)		(861	)		(158	)

Other comprehensive income (loss) gain before taxes		1,950			(3,398	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		682			(1,155	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,268		$	(2,243	)

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

The amortized cost and ~~nine month periods ended September 30,~~fair value of investment securities aggregated by investment category at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 ~~and 2013.~~are summarized as follows:

~~The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities aggregated by investment category at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:~~


December 31, 2013	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2014									Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities									$	48,393	$	157			$	48,550
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises	$	113,221	$	296		472		113,045		95,990		337	$	82		96,245
State and municipals:
Taxable		16,664		160		126		16,698
Tax-exempt		96,194		2,267		380		98,081
Corporate debt securities		4,433		32		78		4,387
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		20,386		113		66		20,433
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		45,251		763		40		45,974
Common equity securities		756		351		10		1,097

Total	$	296,905	$	3,982	$	1,172	$	299,715

Held-to-maturity:
State and municipals:
Taxable										16,490		943		26		17,407
Tax-exempt	$	7,372	$	11	$	777	$	6,606		87,954		4,971		24		92,901
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		117		2				119		37,511		132		167		37,476
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		9,806		644				10,450		46,956		277		226		47,007

Total	$	17,295	$	657	$	777	$	17,175	$	333,294	$	6,817	$	525	$	339,586

Held-to-maturity:
Tax-exempt state and municipals									$	7,370	$	105	$	38	$	7,437
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies										100		2				102
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises										7,195		481				7,676

Total									$	14,665	$	588	$	38	$	15,215

The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt securities classified as available-for-sale at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, is summarized as follows:


September 30, 2014	Fair Value
March 31, 2015			Fair Value
Within one year	$	28,889	$	32,644
After one but within five years		132,467		80,316
After five but within ten years		32,136		28,954
After ten years		67,163		59,378

		260,655		201,292
Mortgage-backed securities		90,170		79,008

Total	$	350,825	$	280,300

The maturity distribution of the amortized cost and fair value, of debt securities classified as held-to-maturity at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, is summarized as follows:


September 30, 2014	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
March 31, 2015					Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Within one year
After one but within five years	$	325	$	333	$	326	$	334
After five but within ten years		176		182		176		182
After ten years		6,869		6,662		6,868		6,924

		7,370		7,177		7,370		7,440
Mortgage-backed securities		7,894		8,339		6,802		7,289

Total	$	15,264	$	15,516	$	14,172	$	14,729

Securities with a carrying value of ~~$215,113~~$207,895 and ~~$202,407~~$216,192 at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and repurchase agreements as required or permitted by law.

Securities and short-term investment activities are conducted with a diverse group of government entities, corporations and state and local municipalities. The counterparty’s creditworthiness and type of collateral is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. At ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk from any one issuer, with the exception of U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises, that exceeded 10.0 percent of stockholders’ equity.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities with unrealized losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) has not been recognized at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows:


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total				Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
September 30, 2014	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	48,061	$	296					$	48,061	$	296
March 31, 2015													Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		32,649		74	$	20,940	$	154		53,589		228	$	7,970	$	12	$	2,999	$	10	$	10,969	$	22
State and municipals:
Taxable		1,599		25						1,599		25						554		15		554		15
Tax-exempt		8,417		35		4,776		188		13,193		223		14,234		61		787		19		15,021		80
Corporate debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		26,466		287						26,466		287		14,885		62		3,790		31		18,675		93
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		29,382		451						29,382		451		19,098		149						19,098		149
Common equity securities

Total	$	146,574	$	1,168	$	25,716	$	342	$	172,290	$	1,510	$	56,187	$	284	$	8,130	$	75	$	64,317	$	359


	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total				Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
December 31, 2013	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2014													Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises	$	66,391	$	468	$	3,114	$	4	$	69,505	$	472	$	21,228	$	33	$	7,954	$	49	$	29,182	$	82
State and municipals:
Taxable		10,621		126						10,621		126						544		26		544		26
Tax-exempt		36,471		1,157						36,471		1,157		4,702		23		2,423		39		7,125		62
Corporate debt securities		1,095		78						1,095		78
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		12,978		66						12,978		66		20,148		167						20,148		167
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		5,624		40						5,624		40		22,870		226						22,870		226
Common equity securities		137		10						137		10

Total	$	133,317	$	1,945	$	3,114	$	4	$	136,431	$	1,949	$	68,948	$	449	$	10,921	$	114	$	79,869	$	563

The Company had ~~114~~63 investment securities, consisting of 2836 tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, ~~two~~one taxable state and municipal ~~obligations, 26~~obligation, three U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities, 33and 23 mortgage-backed ~~securities, and 25 U.S. Treasury~~ securities that were in unrealized loss positions at ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Of these securities, ~~seven~~one U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise security, one taxable state and municipal obligation, two mortgage-backed securities and ~~nine~~two tax-exempt state and municipal securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more. Management does not consider the unrealized losses on the debt securities, as a result of changes in interest rates, to be OTTI based on historical evidence that indicates the cost of these securities is recoverable within a reasonable period of time in relation to normal cyclical changes in the market rates of interest. Moreover, because there has been no material change in the credit quality of the issuers or other events or circumstances that may cause a significant adverse impact on the fair value of these securities, and management does not intend to sell these securities and it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider the unrealized losses to be OTTI at ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. There was no OTTI recognized for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013.~~2014.

The Company had ~~153~~52 investment securities, consisting of 7916 tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, 16one taxable state and municipal ~~obligations, 39~~obligation, nine U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities 16and 26 mortgage-backed ~~securities, one corporate debt security and two common equity~~ securities that were in unrealized loss positions at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. Of these securities, ~~one~~two U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise ~~security was~~securities, four tax-exempt state and municipal securities, and one taxable state and municipal obligation were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more.

The major classifications of loans outstanding, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 are summarized as follows. Net deferred loan costs were ~~$526~~$648 and ~~$24~~$651 at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.


	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commercial	$	323,312	$	350,680	$	319,468	$	319,590
Real estate:
Commercial		456,153		413,058		522,432		493,481
Residential		315,082		322,062		305,663		310,667
Consumer		85,395		90,817		89,605		86,156

Total	$	1,179,942	$	1,176,617	$	1,237,168	$	1,209,894

The changes in the allowance for loan losses account by major classification of loan for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~ are summarized as follows:


				Real estate															Real estate
September 30, 2014	Commercial			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Total
March 31, 2015																Commercial			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance July 1, 2014	$	2,201		$	2,675		$	3,458		$	1,288		$	9,622
Beginning Balance																$	2,321		$	3,037		$	3,690		$	1,290		$	10,338
Charge-offs					(57	)		(56	)		(64	)		(177	)		(37	)		(49	)		(199	)		(80	)		(365	)
Recoveries		5			22						33			60			61			1			5			13			80
Provisions		152			185			239			90			666			75			98			413			164			750

Ending balance	$	2,358		$	2,825		$	3,641		$	1,347		$	10,171		$	2,420		$	3,087		$	3,909		$	1,387		$	10,803


				Real estate															Real estate
September 30, 2014	Commercial			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Total
March 31, 2014																Commercial			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance January 1, 2014	$	2,008		$	2,394		$	3,135		$	1,114		$	8,651
Beginning Balance																$	2,008		$	2,394		$	3,135		$	1,114		$	8,651
Charge-offs		(376	)		(489	)		(566	)		(219	)		(1,650	)		(347	)		(28	)		(240	)		(68	)		(683	)
Recoveries		6			291			38			111			446									3			31			34
Provisions		720			629			1,034			341			2,724			300			107			350			100			857

Ending balance	$	2,358		$	2,825		$	3,641		$	1,347		$	10,171		$	1,961		$	2,473		$	3,248		$	1,177		$	8,859

The allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the related loans by major classifications of loans at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 is summarized as follows:


			Real estate											Real estate
September 30, 2014	Commercial		Commercial		Residential		Consumer		Unallocated	Total
March 31, 2015												Commercial		Commercial		Residential		Consumer		Unallocated	Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	2,358	$	2,825	$	3,641	$	1,347		$	10,171	$	2,420	$	3,087	$	3,909	$	1,387		$	10,803

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		1,163		660		275		17			2,115		1,263		625		843		90			2,821

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		1,195		2,165		3,366		1,330			8,056		954		2,355		3,066		1,297			7,672

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$		$		$		$			$		$	203	$	107	$		$			$	310

Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	323,312	$	456,153	$	315,082	$	85,395		$	1,179,942	$	319,468	$	522,432	$	305,663	$	89,605		$	1,237,168

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		2,721		7,799		3,318		81			13,919		2,631		4,757		3,853		101			11,342

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		319,179		446,985		311,703	$	85,314			1,163,181		315,524		516,295		301,752	$	89,504			1,223,075

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	1,412	$	1,369	$	61				$	2,842	$	1,313	$	1,380	$	58				$	2,751

The Company segments loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Loans are individually analyzed for credit risk by classifying them within the Company’s internal risk rating system. The Company’s risk rating classifications are defined as follows:

The following tables present the major classification of loans summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013:~~2014:

~~Information concerning nonaccrual loans by major loan classification at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is summarized as follows:~~


	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
March 31, 2015:					Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful	Total
Commercial	$	1,626	$	2,035	$	307,690	$	6,802	$	4,976		$	319,468
Real estate:
Commercial		6,666		9,172		503,620		9,885		8,927			522,432
Residential		2,951		3,569		296,500		1,065		8,098			305,663
Consumer		81		90		89,504				101			89,605

Total	$	11,324	$	14,866	$	1,197,314	$	17,752	$	22,102		$	1,237,168

Information concerning nonaccrual loans by major loan classification at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is summarized as follows:

The major classifications of loans by past due status are summarized as follows:

The following tables summarize information concerning impaired loans as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, and as of and for the year ended, December 31, 2013 by major loan classification:


							This Quarter				Year-to-Date
September 30, 2014	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
December 31, 2014															30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Loans > 90 Days and Accruing
Commercial	$	2,352	$	4,076			$	2,501	$	19	$	2,771	$	71	$	898	$	117	$	1,322	$	2,337	$	317,253	$	319,590
Real estate:
Commercial		5,275		6,074				7,587		20		9,238		58		2,100		888		3,868		6,856		486,625		493,481	$	136
Residential		2,629		2,816				2,675		1		2,758		3		3,154		1,239		4,585		8,978		301,689		310,667		1,062
Consumer		64		64				81				101				848		247		547		1,642		84,514		86,156		425

Total		10,320		13,030				12,844		40		14,868		132	$	7,000	$	2,491	$	10,322	$	19,813	$	1,190,081	$	1,209,894	$	1,623

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		1,781		1,781	$	1,163		1,769		20		1,825		63
Real estate:
Commercial		3,893		3,893		660		2,640		14		1,816		43
Residential		750		750		275		504		4		428		4
Consumer		17		17		17		9				3

Total		6,441		6,441		2,115		4,922		38		4,072		110

Commercial		4,133		5,857		1,163		4,270		39		4,596		134
Real estate:
Commercial		9,168		9,967		660		10,227		34		11,054		101
Residential		3,379		3,566		275		3,179		5		3,186		7
Consumer		81		81		17		90				104

Total	$	16,761	$	19,471	$	2,115	$	17,766	$	78	$	18,940	$	242

The following tables summarize information concerning impaired loans at and for the period ended March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, by major loan classification:


							This Quarter				Year-to-Date										For the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2013	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
March 31, 2015															Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial	$	305	$	305			$	82			$	213			$	2,319	$	3,900			$	2,349	$	20
Real estate:
Commercial		267		267				293				289				2,198		2,936				2,565		19
Residential		1,621		1,621				1,552				1,217				2,272		2,456				2,472		1
Consumer		99		99				85				75				11		11				47

Total		2,292		2,292				2,012				1,794				6,800		9,303				7,433		40

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		2,064		2,064	$	1,464		3,226	$	70		1,440	$	82		1,625		1,625	$	1,466		1,597	$	14
Real estate:
Commercial		1,424		1,424		300		1,396		19		1,435		57		3,939		3,939		732		3,732		17
Residential		599		599		195		372		4		943		10		1,639		1,639		843		1,513		10
Consumer																90		90		90		67

Total		4,087		4,087		1,959		4,994		93		3,818		149		7,293		7,293		3,131		6,909		41

Commercial		2,369		2,369		1,464		3,308		70		1,653		82		3,944		5,525		1,466		3,946		34
Real estate:
Commercial		1,691		1,691		300		1,689		19		1,724		57		6,137		6,875		732		6,297		36
Residential		2,220		2,220		195		1,924		4		2,160		10		3,911		4,095		843		3,985		11
Consumer		99		99				85				75				101		101		90		114

Total	$	6,379	$	6,379	$	1,959	$	7,006	$	93	$	5,612	$	149	$	14,093	$	16,596	$	3,131	$	14,342	$	81

Included in the commercial loan and residential and commercial real estate categories are troubled debt restructurings that are classified as impaired. ~~Troubled~~Trouble debt restructurings totaled ~~$2,500~~$2,967 at ~~September 30, 2014, $2,487~~March 31, 2015, $2,933 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~$344~~$1,924 at ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

Troubled debt restructured loans are loans with original terms, interest rate, or both, that have been modified as a result of a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition and a concession has been granted that the Company would not otherwise consider. Unless on nonaccrual, interest income on these loans is recognized when earned, using the interest method. The Company offers a variety of modifications to borrowers that would be considered concessions. The modification categories offered can generally fall within the following categories:

5. Loans, net and allowance for loan ~~modified as a troubled debt restructuring for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 in the amount of $2,500.~~ losses (continued):

There were ~~no new~~four loans modified as troubled debt restructurings for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2015, in the amount of $384. There were no loans modified as troubled debt restructurings for the three months ended March 31, 2014. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, ~~and 2013,~~ there were no defaults on loans restructured within the last twelve months.

The components of other assets at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 are summarized as follows:


	September 30,		December 31,
	2014		2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Other real estate owned	$	840	$	648	$	324	$	561
Investment in residential housing program		3,021		3,211		4,178		4,329
Mortgage servicing rights		824		880		623		676
Bank owned life insurance		29,790		29,198		30,177		29,983
Restricted equity securities		4,078		4,102		2,132		3,687
Other assets		12,924		9,949		13,352		13,830

Total	$	51,477	$	47,988	$	50,786	$	53,066

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosure under GAAP. Fair value estimates are calculated without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of certain assets and liabilities that are not considered financial. Accordingly, such assets and liabilities are excluded from disclosure requirements.

In accordance with FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In many cases, these values cannot be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.

Current fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale between participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

In accordance with GAAP, the Company groups its assets and liabilities generally measured at fair value into three levels based on market information or other fair value estimates in which the assets and liabilities are traded or valued and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels include:

An asset’s or liability’s placement in the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of ~~input~~imput that is significant to the fair value estimate.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to calculate fair values and related carrying amounts of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents as reported on the balance sheet approximate fair value.

Investment securities:The fair values of ~~U.S. Treasury securities and~~ marketable equity securities are based on quoted market prices from active exchange markets. The fair values of debt securities are based on pricing from a matrix pricing model.

Loans held for sale: The fair values of loans held for sale are based upon current delivery prices in the secondary mortgage market.

Net loans: For adjustable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values of other non-impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently offered in the market for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis determined by the loan review function or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

In conjunction with the ~~Merger,~~2013 merger with Penseco Financial Services Corporation (“Penseco”), the loans purchased were recorded at their acquisition date fair value. In order to record the loans at fair value, management made three different types of fair value adjustments. A market rate adjustment was made to adjust for the movement in market interest rates, irrespective of credit adjustments, compared to the stated rates of the acquired loans. A credit adjustment was made on pools of homogeneous loans representing the changes in credit quality of the underlying borrowers from the loan inception to the acquisition date. The credit adjustment on distressed loans represents the portion of the loan balance that has been deemed uncollectible based on the management’s expectations of future cash flows for each respective loan.

Mortgage servicing rights:To determine the fair value, the Company estimates the present value of future cash flows incorporating assumptions such as cost of servicing, discount rates, prepayment speeds and default rates.

Accrued interest receivable: The carrying value of accrued interest receivable as reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.

Restricted equity securities:The carrying values of restricted equity securities approximate fair value, due to the lack of marketability for these securities.

Deposits: The fair values of noninterest-bearing deposits and savings, NOW and money market accounts are the amounts payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from such low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market. The carrying values of adjustable-rate, fixed-term time deposits approximate their fair values at the reporting date. For fixed-rate time deposits, the present value of future cash flows is used to estimate fair values. The discount rates used are the current rates offered for time deposits with similar maturities.

The fair value assigned to the core deposit intangible asset represents the future economic benefit of the potential cost savings from acquiring core deposits in the ~~Merger~~2013 merger with Penseco compared to the cost of obtaining alternative funding such as brokered deposits from market sources. Management utilized an income valuation approach to present value the estimated future cash savings in order to determine the fair value of the intangible asset.

Short-term borrowings: The carrying values of short-term borrowings approximate fair value.

Long-term debt: The fair value of fixed-rate long-term debt is based on the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate used is the current rate offered for long-term debt with the same maturity.

Accrued interest payable: The carrying value of accrued interest payable as reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.

The majority of commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit and standby letters of credit carry current market interest rates if converted to loans. Because such commitments are generally unassignable of either the Company or the borrower, they only have value to the Company and the borrower. None of the commitments are subject to undue credit risk. The estimated fair values of off-balance sheet financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair value of off-balance sheet financial instruments was not material at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:

~~Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:~~

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 are summarized as follows:


	Fair Value Measurement Using								Fair Value Measurement Using
September 30, 2014	Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
March 31, 2015							Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	1,826			$	1,826	$	4,862			$	4,862
Other real estate owned	$	285			$	285	$	159			$	159

	Fair Value Measurement Using								Fair Value Measurement Using
December 31, 2013	Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
December 31, 2014							Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	2,354			$	2,354	$	4,414			$	4,414
Other real estate owned	$	437			$	437	$	218			$	218

Fair values of impaired loans are based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

September 30, 2014

Fair Value
Estimate

Valuation Techniques

Unobservable Input

Range
(Weighted Average)

March 31, 2015

Fair Value
Estimate

Valuation Techniques

Unobservable Input

Range
(Weighted Average)

Impaired loans

1,826

Appraisal of collateral

Appraisal adjustments

2.6% to 74.0% (22.9%)

4,862

Appraisal of collateral

Appraisal adjustments

13.3% to 51.1% (23.0%

)

Liquidation expenses

3.0% to 6.0% (5.6%)

Liquidation expenses

3.0% to 6.0% (5.4%

)

Other real estate owned

285

Appraisal of collateral

Appraisal adjustments

17.0% to 24.0 % (20.7%)

159

Appraisal of collateral

Appraisal adjustments

19.7% to 77.9% (37.3%

)

Liquidation expenses

3.0% to 6.0% (4.4%)

Liquidation expenses

3.0% to 6.0% (5.0%

)

Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 Inputs which are not identifiable.

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

The carrying and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and their placement within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


					Fair Value Hierarchy										Fair Value Hierarchy
December 31, 2013	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
March 31, 2015											Carrying Value		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	51,310	$	51,310	$	51,310					$	39,631	$	39,631	$	39,631
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale		299,715		299,715	$	1,097	$	298,618				280,300		280,300			$	280,300
Held-to-maturity		17,295		17,175				17,175				14,172		14,729				14,729
Loans held for sale		1,757		1,757				1,757				3,101		3,107				3,107
Net loans		1,167,966		1,180,387					$	1,180,387		1,226,365		1,238,915					$	1,238,915
Accrued interest receivable		5,866		5,866				5,866				4,922		4,922				4,922
Mortgage servicing rights		880		1,440				1,440				623		1,466				1,466
Restricted equity securities		4,102		4,102				4,102				2,132		2,132				2,132

Total											$	1,571,246	$	1,585,202

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	1,379,507	$	1,381,946				1,381,946			$	1,416,278	$	1,418,370				1,418,370
Short-term borrowings		22,052		22,052				22,052
Long-term debt		36,743		37,468				37,468				32,318		34,133				34,133
Accrued interest payable		723		723				723				460		460			$	460

Total											$	1,449,056	$	1,452,963

The Company provides an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), and a Retirement Profit Sharing ~~401(k)~~Plan. The Company also maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), an Employees’ Pension Plan, which is currently frozen, ~~a supplemental executive defined benefit plan (currently frozen), a supplemental executive defined contribution plan, non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERP”),~~and a Postretirement Plan Life Insurance ~~Plan,~~plan which was curtailed in ~~2013, and a Long-Term Incentive Plan. For the three and nine months ended September 30, salaries~~2013.

Salaries and employee benefits expense includes approximately ~~$581~~$279 and ~~$1,744 in 2014 and $378 and $1,135 in 2013~~$250 relating to the employee benefit ~~plans.~~plans for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.


	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Life Insurance Benefits			Pension Benefits
Three months ended September 30,	2014			2013			2014	2013
Net periodic pension cost:
Three months ended March 31,										2015			2014
Net periodic pension income:
Service cost								$	11
Interest cost	$	169		$	162				33	$	174		$	169
Expected return on plan assets		(227	)		(207	)					(233	)		(227	)
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		23			45				28		50			23

Net periodic pension cost	$	(35	)	$				$	72
Net periodic pension income										$	(9	)	$	(35	)

~~Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report, and with our audited consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies and expectations of Peoples Financial Services Corp. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. All statements in this report, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements.

Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: our ability to ~~timely and efficiently integrate the operations of the former Penseco Financial Services Corporation, and to~~ achieve the intended benefits of the 2013 merger with ~~Penseco Financial Services Corporation;~~Penseco; changes in interest rates; economic conditions, particularly in our market area; legislative and regulatory changes and the ability to comply with the significant laws and regulations governing the banking and financial services business; monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve System; credit risk associated with lending activities and changes in the quality and composition of our loan and investment portfolios; demand for loan and other products; deposit flows; competition; changes in the values of real estate and other collateral securing the loan portfolio, particularly in our market area; changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines; and inability of third party service providers to perform. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, and in reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, Peoples Financial Services Corp. does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior period amounts may have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. Any reclassifications did not have any effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.

Disclosure of our significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. Some of these policies are particularly sensitive requiring significant judgments, estimates and assumptions.

Fiscal policy initiatives enacted by the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014 was~~2015 were limited to ~~continuing the tapering~~changing of ~~investment purchases employed~~language used in its ~~quantitative easing initiatives.~~policy statements. The FOMC ~~is scheduled~~dropped the word “patient” when discussing a move toward normalizing monetary policy from the March minutes, replacing it with “reasonable confidence” when referring to ~~conclude this latest initiative in October 2014.~~attaining their inflation target of 2.0 percent. Economic ~~growth as measured by~~performance for the first quarter of 2015 was sluggish. Economic indicators throughout the latter part of 2014 and into 2015 pointed to an improving economy. However, the tough winter experienced throughout much of the country caused the gross domestic product (“GDP”), the value of all goods and services produced in the ~~U.S., is expected~~Nation, to decrease in the third quarter of 2014 compared to the level experienced in the prior quarter. The GDP is expected to grow 3.0% in the third quarter of 2014, a decrease from the growth of 4.6% in the second quarter of 2014. If these estimates are accurate, this may point to an improving economy. There was concern that the strong second quarter GDP growth was the result of nothing more than the economy playing catch up after a negative GDP readingslow in the first quarter of ~~2014, which was caused by~~2015 to a seasonally adjusted growth rate of 0.2 percent, much weaker than the ~~tough winter~~2.4 percent experienced in ~~much~~2014 and the 2.2 percent in 2013. In light of the ~~Country.~~disappointing economic indicators and lack of inflationary pressure, the FOMC moderated its assessment of the pace of economic expansion. The latest monthly employment figures released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicate strong job creation during 2014. Based on preliminary September 2014 numbers of 248,000 jobs being created, the economy is creating 227,000 jobs per month on average in 2014. The current growth rate is more than sufficient to satisfy an estimated 90,000 to 125,000 new entrants to the job market each month and the estimated 150,000 to 200,000 jobs estimated to be needed in order to improve the unemployment rate. This is further evidenced by the drop in the unemployment rate to 5.9% at quarter-end from 7.2% one year earlier. With regard to inflation, rising food and energy costs caused theconsumer price index ~~for gross domestic purchases,~~(“CPI”) declined 1.3 percent annualized during the first quarter of 2015. While a ~~measure~~majority of ~~prices paid by United States residents,~~economists expect the FOMC to ~~remain at 1.7% for~~raise short-term rates as early as June, the ~~most recent reporting month of September 2014, slightly below~~mixed to negative economic data has pushed longer term treasury yields down. Accordingly, a flat yield curve would increase the ~~2.0% rate targeted by the Federal Reserve. Current food and energy prices continue to aid other consumer spending and if sustained, may contribute to job gains and support GDP growth going forward.~~pressure on bank margins.

Total assets ~~increased $36,557,~~declined $27,708 or at an annual rate of ~~2.9%~~6.5% to ~~$1,724,778~~$1,713,961 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, from ~~$1,688,221~~$1,741,669 at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. The balance sheet decline during the first quarter of 2015 was centered mainly on decreases in investment securities. Investment securities available-for-sale decreased $59,286 in the first quarter of 2015. Loans, net increased to $1,237,168 at March 31, 2015, compared to $1,209,894 at December 31, 2014, an increase of $27,274 or 9.1% annualized. Total, deposits decreased $9,280, to $1,416,278 at March 31, 2015 from $1,425,558 at year-end December 31, 2014. Interest-bearing deposits decreased $819, while noninterest-bearing deposits declined $8,461. Total stockholders’ equity increased $2,679 from $246,779 at year-end 2014 to $249,458 at March 31, 2015. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, total assets averaged ~~$1,711,096,~~$1,711,339, an increase of ~~$787,860~~$16,269 or 0.95%, from ~~$923,236~~$1,695,070 for the same period of 2013, primarily due to the merger. The balance sheet growth during 2014 was driven by increases in total deposits of $46,121, an annual growth rate of 4.5%. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $22,337, while interest-bearing deposits increased $23,784. Loans, net increased to $1,179,942 at September 30, 2014, compared to $1,176,617 at December 31, 2013. Total stockholders’ equity increased $7,277 or at an annual rate of 4.1%, from $238,792 at year-end 2013 to $246,069 at September 30, 2014. ~~For the third quarter of 2014, total assets decreased $6,328 while loans, net and deposits increased $95 and $2,826.~~

The majority of the investment portfolio is held as available-for-sale, which allows for greater flexibility in using the investment portfolio for liquidity purposes by allowing securities to be sold when market opportunities occur. Investment securities available-for-sale totaled ~~$350,825~~$280,300 at ~~September 30, 2014, an increase~~March 31, 2015, a decrease of ~~$51,110,~~$59,286, or ~~17.1%~~17.5% from ~~$299,715~~$339,586 at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. The ~~increase resulted~~decrease was primarily ~~from~~a result of the ~~purchase~~sale of U.S. Treasury securities in response to changes in the slope of the yield curve and ~~collateralized mortgage obligations.~~in order to fund increased loan demand. Investment securities held-to-maturity totaled ~~$15,264~~$14,172 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, a decrease of ~~$2,031~~$493, or ~~11.7%~~3.4% from ~~$17,295~~$14,665 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014 due to payments received from mortgage backed holdings.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, total investments increased $37,851 consisting of an increase of $38,502 in available-for-sale securities and a decrease of $651 in held-to-maturity securities.~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the investment portfolio averaged ~~$331,211, an increase~~$313,075, a decrease of ~~$158,387~~$6,723 or 2.1% compared to ~~$172,824~~$319,798 for the same period last year. The tax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio decreased 563 basis points to ~~2.70%~~2.78% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, from ~~3.26%~~2.81% for the comparable period of ~~2013.~~2014. The yield decline is the result of decreasing reinvestment yields as well as an overall investment strategy aimed at shortening the duration of the investment portfolio. The tax-equivalent yield decreased from 2.77% in the second quarter of 2014 to 2.55% in the third quarter of 2014.yields.

Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses net of deferred income taxes reported in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component of stockholders’ equity. ~~The carrying value of securities at September 30, 2014, included a~~We reported net unrealized ~~gain of $4,760 reflected~~holding gains, included as a separate component of ~~accumulated other comprehensive income in~~ stockholders’ equity of $4,048, net of ~~deferred~~ income taxes of ~~$1,666. This compares to a~~$2,179, at March 31, 2015, and $4,090, net ~~unrealized gain~~ of ~~$2,810~~income taxes of $2,202, at December 31, ~~2013, net of deferred income taxes of $984.~~2014.

The Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) reviews the performance and risk elements of the investment portfolio ~~monthly.~~quarterly. Through active balance sheet management and analysis of the securities portfolio, we seek to maintain sufficient liquidity to satisfy depositor requirements and meet the credit needs of our customers.

~~Payments and prepayments on loans were slightly lower than~~Continuing the ~~amount~~momentum of a strong fourth quarter in 2014, loan ~~originations during~~growth was again robust in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014. As a result, loans,~~2015. Loans, net increased ~~slightly~~ to ~~$1,179,942~~$1,237,168 at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$1,176,617~~$1,209,894 at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014, an increase of $27,274 or 9.1% annualized. The marginal increase was a reflection of weak market conditions, heightened competitive forces and efforts devoted to the conversion of the loan system throughout much of the second and third quarters of 2014, as a result of the merger. The net changegrowth reflected increases in commercial real estate loans and consumer loans, partially offset by decreases in commercial loans and residential real estate ~~and consumer~~ loans. Commercial real estate loans increased ~~$43,095,~~$28,951 or ~~14.0% on an~~23.8% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$456,153~~$522,432 at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~$413,058~~$493,481 at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. Commercial loans decreased ~~$27,368,~~$122, or ~~10.4% on an~~0.2% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$323,312~~$319,468 at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~$350,680~~$319,590 at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

Weakness in residential real estate markets have further cut into the wealth of consumers. Home sales were hampered in the first quarter of 2015 due to severe winter conditions throughout much of the nation. Residential real estate loans decreased $5,004, or 6.5% annualized, to $305,663 at March 31, 2015 compared to $310,667 at December 31, 2014. Conversely, consumer loans increased $3,449, or 16.2% annualized, to $89,605 at March 31, 2015 compared to $86,156 at December 31, 2014.

Slow improvement in labor markets, coupled with higher food and energy prices, have hampered consumer purchasing power throughout the third quarter of 2014. Additionally, weakness in real estate markets have further cut into the wealth of consumers. Residential real estate loans decreased $6,980, or 2.9% on an annualized basis, to $315,082 at September 30, 2014 compared to $322,062 at December 31, 2013 while consumer loans decreased $5,422, or 8.0% on an annualized basis, to $85,395 at September 30, 2014 compared to $90,817 at December 31, 2013.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, loans, net averaged ~~$1,184,393,~~$1,225,769, an increase of ~~$543,393~~$44,288 or 3.7% compared to ~~$641,000~~$1,181,481 for the same period of ~~2013, primarily due to the merger.~~2014. The tax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio was ~~4.91%~~4.70% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, a 2~~March 31, 2015, which was 44 basis ~~point decrease from~~points less than the comparable period last year. ~~The tax-equivalent yield~~Interest income on ~~the loan portfolio increased 18 basis points to 4.89% in the third quarter of 2014 from 4.71% in the second quarter of 2014. Adjusting for the recognition of~~loans included accretion recognized on loans acquired as part of the 2013 merger with Penseco of $225 in the ~~merger, the increase was 20 basis points comparing the second and third quarters of 2014.~~

~~For the third~~first quarter of ~~2014, loans, net increased $95. Increases~~2015 and $1,055 in ~~commercial real estate loans~~the comparable period of ~~$16,211 and consumer loans of $452 were almost entirely offset by decreases in commercial loans of $13,721 and residential mortgage loans of $2,847.~~2014.

In addition to the risks inherent in our loan portfolio, in the normal course of business, we are also a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments include legally binding commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit and commercial letters of credit made under the same underwriting standards as on-balance sheet instruments, and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk (“IRR”) in excess of the amount recognized in the financial statements.

Unused commitments at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, totaled ~~$235,071,~~$260,105, consisting of ~~$201,683~~$234,783 in unfunded commitments of existing loan facilities and ~~$33,388~~$25,322 in standby letters of credit. Due to fixed maturity dates, specified conditions within these instruments, and the ultimate needs of our customers, many will expire without being drawn upon. We believe that amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations and therefore, do not represent a significant liquidity risk to us. In comparison, unused commitments, at December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, totaled ~~$303,309,~~$266,570, consisting of ~~$273,395~~$235,961 in unfunded commitments of existing loans and ~~$29,914~~$30,609 in standby letters of credit.

National, Pennsylvania, New York and market area unemployment rates at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014, ~~and 2013,~~ are summarized as follows:

The employment conditions improved for the Nation, Pennsylvania, New York as well as ~~all~~ seven of the eight counties representing our market areas in Pennsylvania and New York from one year ago. Despite the overall improvements, employment conditions continued to be somewhat weak as unemployment ~~rates~~levels remained elevated ~~relative~~compared to historical levels.

Our asset quality improved in the third quarter of 2014. Nonperforming assets decreased $6,337 or 32.6% to $13,119 at September 30, 2014, from $19,456 at December 31, 2013. We experienced an increase in other real estate owned, which was more than offset by declines in nonaccrual and restructured loans and accruing loans past due 90 days or more. As a percentage of loans, net and foreclosed assets, nonperforming assets equaled 1.11% at September 30, 2014 compared to 1.65% at December 31, 2013.

Loans on nonaccrual status decreased $3,542 to $11,324 at September 30, 2014 from $14,866 at December 31, 2013. The majority of the decrease from year end was due to a decrease of $2,506 in commercial real estate loans and a decrease of $618 in residential real estate loans on nonaccrual status. Commercial and retail consumer loans on nonaccrual status decreased $418. Other real estate owned increased $192 to $840 at September 30, 2014 from $648 at December 31, 2013.

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, nonperforming assets improved to $13,119, a decrease of $2,816 from $15,935 at June 30, 2014. Decreases in nonaccrual loans of $2,292 and accruing loans past due 90 days or more of $738 more than offset a $214 increase in other real estate owned.

Generally, maintaining a high loan to deposit ratio allows us to improve profitability. However, this objective is superseded by our attempts to assure that asset quality remains strong. We continued our efforts to maintain sound underwriting standards for both commercial and consumer credit. Most commercial lending is done primarily with locally owned small businesses.

Our asset quality declined slightly in the first quarter of 2015. Nonperforming assets increased $414 or 3.8% to $11,297 at March 31, 2015, from $10,883 at December 31, 2014. We experienced decreases in other real estate owned and accruing loans past due 90 days or more. However, those decreases were outweighed by an increase in nonaccrual and restructured loans. As a percentage of loans, net and foreclosed assets, nonperforming assets equaled 0.91% at March 31, 2015 compared to 0.90% at December 31, 2014.

Loans on nonaccrual status increased $876 to $9,575 at March 31, 2015 from $8,699 at December 31, 2014. The increase from year end was due primarily to an increase of $1,044 in commercial loans on nonaccrual status. Retail loans, including residential real estate and consumer loans on nonaccrual status declined $217. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more decreased $386 to $1,237 at March 31, 2015 when compared to $1,623 at December 31, 2014. Other real estate owned decreased $237 to $324 at March 31, 2015 when compared to $561 at December 31, 2014.

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred loan losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses is based on past events and current economic conditions. We employ the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement, as amended December 13, 2006, and GAAP in assessing the adequacy of the allowance account. Under GAAP, the adequacy of the allowance account is determined based on the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310, “Receivables,” for loans specifically identified to be individually evaluated for impairment and the requirements of FASB ASC 450, “Contingencies,” for large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans to be collectively evaluated for impairment.

We follow our systematic methodology in accordance with procedural discipline by applying it in the same manner regardless of whether the allowance is being determined at a high point or a low point in the economic cycle. Each quarter, loan review identifies those loans to be individually evaluated for impairment and those loans collectively evaluated for impairment utilizing a standard criteria. Internal loan review grades are assigned quarterly to loans identified to be individually evaluated. A loan’s grade may differ from period to period based on current conditions and events, however, we consistently utilize the same grading system each quarter. We consistently use loss experience from the latest twelve quarters in determining the historical loss factor for each pool collectively evaluated for impairment. Qualitative factors are evaluated in the same manner each quarter and are adjusted within a relevant range of values based on current conditions. For additional disclosure related to the allowance for loan losses refer to the note entitled, “Loans, net and Allowance for Loan Losses,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to this Quarterly Report.

The allowance for loan losses increased ~~$1,520~~$465 to ~~$10,171~~$10,803 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, from ~~$8,651~~$10,338 at the end of ~~2013.~~2014. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, net charge-offs were ~~$1,204~~$285 or ~~0.14%~~0.09% of average loans outstanding ~~an $800 increase~~in 2015, a $364 decrease compared to ~~$404~~$649 or ~~0.08%~~0.22% of average loans outstanding in the ~~same period~~first quarter of ~~2013. Net charge-offs were $117 or 0.04%~~2014.

The majority of ~~average loans outstanding~~our deposits are attracted from within our eight county market area that stretches from the Lehigh Valley in Pennsylvania to Broome County in the ~~third quarter~~Southern Tier of ~~2014, a $89 decrease compared to $206 or 0.13% of average loans outstanding in the third quarter of 2013.~~

~~Deposits are attracted within our primary market area~~New York State through the offering of various deposit instruments including demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts, money market deposit accounts, savings accounts, and time deposits, including certificates of deposit and IRA’s. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, total deposits ~~increased $46,121,~~decreased $9,280, or ~~4.5% on an~~2.6% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$1,425,628~~$1,416,278 from ~~$1,379,507~~$1,425,558 at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. Growth was experienced in savings accounts while the other classifications declined. Savings deposits increased $10,570, or 10.9% annualized, to $402,522 at March 31, 2015, from $391,952 at December 31, 2014. All other deposit categories decreased in the first quarter of 2015 due to cyclical trends. Interest-bearing ~~checking deposits,~~transaction accounts, including NOW and money market accounts, ~~increased $30,971,~~decreased $1,624, or ~~9.8% on an~~1.5% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$455,528~~$450,742 at ~~September 30, 2014, compared to $424,557~~March 31, 2015, from $452,366 at December 31, ~~2013. Savings~~2014. Demand deposits, ~~increased $10,766,~~decreased $8,461, or ~~3.9% on an~~11.0% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$382,867~~$305,037 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, compared to ~~$372,101~~$313,498 at December 31, ~~2013. Demand deposits, increased $22,337, or 10.7% on an annualized basis, to $302,279 at September 30, 2014, compared to $279,942 at December 31, 2013.~~2014. Time deposits less than $100 ~~increased $17,579,~~decreased $4,302, or ~~14.0% on an~~9.1% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$185,664~~$187,588 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, compared to ~~$168,085~~$191,890 at December 31, ~~2013~~2014 while time deposits of $100 or more ~~decreased $35,532,~~were down $5,463, or ~~35.2% on an~~29.2% annualized, ~~basis,~~ to ~~$99,290~~$70,389 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, compared to ~~$134,822~~$75,852 at December 31, ~~2013.~~

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, average total deposits increased $24,411 to $1,408,080, compared to $1,383,669 for the same period of 2014. Average noninterest-bearing deposits grew $23,582, while average interest-bearing accounts increased $829. Our cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 4 basis points to 0.46% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, total deposits increased $2,826 or 0.8% on an annualized basis. Growth in interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, as well as savings deposits, more than offset declines in time deposits less than $100 and time deposits of $100 or more.

~~For~~March 31, 2015, from 0.50% for the ~~nine~~three months ended September 30, interest-bearing deposits averaged $1,118,101 in 2014 compared to $583,384 in 2013, due primarily to the merger. The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.49% in 2014 compared to 0.45% for the same period last year. The overall cost of interest-bearing liabilities including the cost of borrowed funds, was 0.58% in 2014 compared to 0.63% in 2013. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 3 basis points to 0.56% comparing the second and third quarters ofMarch 31, 2014.

Interest rates have been at historic lows for an extended period. Short term and core deposit rates have remained flat. As such, deposits have been attracted by offering rates on longer term time deposit products and core savings accounts which are higher than other investment alternatives available to customers elsewhere in the market place.

The Bank utilizes borrowings as a secondary source of liquidity for its asset/liability management. Advances are available from the Federal Home Loan Bank ~~of Pittsburgh~~ (“FHLB) provided certain standards related to credit worthiness have been met. Repurchase and term agreements are also available from the FHLB.

~~Total~~We had no short-term borrowings at ~~September 30, 2014, totaled $6,514~~March 31, 2015 as compared to ~~$22,052~~$19,557 at December 31, ~~2013, a decrease of $15,538, or 70.5%.~~2014. Long-term debt was ~~$34,020~~$32,318 at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, compared to ~~$36,743~~$33,140 at ~~year end 2013.~~December 31, 2014. The reduction was a product of monthly contractual amortized payments made during the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~first quarter of 2015.

Market risk is the risk to our earnings or financial position resulting from adverse changes in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Our exposure to market risk is primarily “IRR” associated with our lending, investing and deposit-gathering activities. During the normal course of business, we are not exposed to foreign exchange risk or commodity price risk. Our exposure to IRR can be explained as the potential for change in our reported earnings and/or the market value of our net worth. Variations in interest rates affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive income and operating expenses. Interest rate changes also affect the underlying economic value of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items. These changes arise because the present value of future cash flows, and often the cash flows themselves, change with interest rates. The effects of the changes in these present values reflect the change in our underlying economic value and provide a basis for the expected change in future earnings related to interest rates. IRR is inherent in the role of banks as financial intermediaries. However, a bank with a high degree of IRR may experience lower earnings, impaired liquidity and capital positions, and most likely, a greater risk of insolvency. Therefore, banks must carefully evaluate IRR to promote safety and soundness in their activities.

As a result of economic uncertainty and a prolonged era of historically low market rates, it has become challenging to manage IRR. Due to these factors, IRR and effectively managing it are very important to both bank management and regulators. Bank regulations require us to develop and maintain an IRR management program, overseen by the Board of Directors and senior management, that involves a comprehensive risk management process in order to effectively identify, measure, monitor and control risk. Should ~~bank regulatory agencies identify a~~we have material ~~weakness~~weaknesses in our risk management process or high exposure relative to our capital, bank regulatory agencies may take action to remedy these shortcomings. Moreover, the level of IRR exposure and the quality of our risk management process is a determining factor when evaluating capital adequacy.

The ALCO, comprised of members of our Board of Directors, senior management and other appropriate officers, oversees our IRR management program. Specifically ALCO analyzes economic data and market interest rate trends, as well as competitive pressures, and utilizes computerized modeling techniques to reveal potential exposure to IRR. This allows us to monitor and attempt to control the influence these factors may have on our rate-sensitive assets (“RSA”) and rate-sensitive liabilities (“RSL”), and overall operating results and financial position. One such technique utilizes a static gap model that considers repricing frequencies of RSA and RSL in order to monitor IRR. Gap analysis attempts to measure our interest rate exposure by calculating the net amount of RSA and RSL that reprice within specific time intervals. A positive gap occurs when the amount of RSA repricing in a specific period is greater than the amount of RSL repricing within that same time frame and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio greater than 1.0. A negative gap occurs when the amount of RSL repricing is greater than the amount of RSA and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio of less than 1.0. A positive gap implies that earnings will be impacted favorably if interest rates rise and adversely if interest rates fall during the period. A negative gap tends to indicate that earnings will be affected inversely to interest rate changes.

Our cumulative one-year RSA/RSL ratio equaled ~~1.90%~~2.24% at ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Given the length of time that market rates have been at historical lows and the potential for rates to ~~increase~~rise in the future, the focus of ALCO has been to create a positive static gap position. With regard to RSA, we predominantly offer medium- term, fixed-rate loans as well as adjustable rate loans. With respect to RSL, we offer longer term promotional certificates of deposit in an attempt to increase duration. The current position at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, indicates that the amount of RSA repricing within one year would exceed that of RSL, ~~thereby causing increases~~which would result in ~~market rates, to~~an increase in net interest ~~income.~~income from rising market rates. However, these forward-looking statements are qualified in the aforementioned section entitled “Forward-Looking Discussion” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Static gap analysis, although a ~~standard~~credible measuring tool, does not fully illustrate the impact of interest rate changes on future earnings. First, market rate changes normally do not equally or simultaneously affect all categories of assets and liabilities. Second, assets and liabilities that can contractually reprice within the same period may not do so at the same time or to the same magnitude. Third, the interest rate sensitivity table presents a one-day position. Variations occur daily as we adjust our rate sensitivity throughout the year. Finally, assumptions must be made in constructing such a table.

As the static gap report fails to address the dynamic changes in the balance sheet composition or prevailing interest rates, we utilize a simulation model to enhance our asset/liability management. This model is used to create pro forma net interest income scenarios under various interest rate shocks. Model results at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, produced results similar to those indicated by the one-year static gap position. In addition, parallel and instantaneous shifts in interest rates under various interest rate shocks resulted in changes in net interest income that were well within ALCO policy limits. We will continue to monitor our IRR throughout ~~2014~~2015 and ~~endeavor to~~ employ deposit and loan pricing strategies and direct the reinvestment of loan and investment repayments in order to ~~manage our~~maintain a favorable IRR position.

Financial institutions are affected differently by inflation than commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets and inventories. Most of our assets are monetary in nature and change correspondingly with variations in the inflation rate. It is difficult to precisely measure the impact inflation has on us, however we believe that our exposure to inflation can be mitigated through asset/liability management.

Liquidity management is essential to our continuing operations and enables us to meet financial obligations as they come due, as well as to take advantage of new business opportunities as they arise. Financial obligations include, but are not limited to, the following:

These obligations are managed daily, thus enabling us to effectively monitor fluctuations in our liquidity position and to adapt that position according to market influences and balance sheet trends. Future liquidity needs are forecasted and strategies are developed to ensure adequate liquidity at all times.

Historically, core deposits have been the primary source of liquidity because of their stability and lower cost, in general, than other types of funding. Providing additional sources of funds are loan and investment payments and prepayments and the ability to sell both available for sale securities and mortgage loans held for sale. We believe liquidity is adequate to meet both present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis.

We employ a number of analytical techniques in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity position. One such technique is the use of ratio analysis related to ~~determine the extent of~~ our reliance on noncore funds to fund our investments and loans maturing after ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Our noncore funds at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, were comprised of time deposits in denominations of $100 or more, repurchase agreements and other borrowings. These funds are not considered to be a strong source of liquidity since they are very interest rate sensitive and are considered to be highly volatile. At ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, our net noncore funding dependence ratio, the difference between noncore funds and short-term investments to long-term assets, was ~~6.8%~~5.4%, while our net short-term noncore funding dependence ratio, noncore funds maturing within one-year, less short-term investments to long-term assets equaled ~~1.2%~~-0.5%. Comparatively, our overall noncore dependence ratio improved from year-end ~~2013~~2014 when it was 10.0%. Similarly, our net short-term noncore funding dependence ratio was 4.1% at year-end, indicating that our reliance on short-term noncore funds has decreased. ~~The decrease in noncore funding reliance resulted primarily from an increase in core deposits.~~

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and cash equivalents, consisting of cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, deposit balances with other banks and federal funds sold, ~~decreased $17,099~~increased $8,205 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Cash and cash equivalents ~~decreased $19,522~~increased $27,902 for the same period last year. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, net cash inflows of ~~$21,463 from financing activities and $14,902~~$7,361 from operating activities and $32,631 from investing activities were ~~more than~~partially offset by a ~~$53,464~~$31,787 net cash outflow from ~~investing~~financing activities. For the same period of ~~2013,~~2014, net cash inflows of ~~$12,139~~$21,971 from financing activities and $7,130 from operating activities were ~~more than~~partially offset by a $1,199 net cash ~~outflows of $25,580~~outflow from investing ~~activities and $6,081 from operating activities~~activities.

Financing activities ~~provided net cash of $21,463 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and~~ used net cash of ~~$6,081~~$31,787 for the ~~corresponding nine~~three months ended March 31, 2015, and provided $21,971 for the same three months of ~~2013.~~2014. Deposit gathering is our predominant financing activity. During the ~~nine~~first three months ~~ended September 30, 2014, deposit gathering accelerated~~of 2015 deposits declined compared to the same period last year. The net ~~increase~~decrease in deposits totaled ~~$46,939~~$9,081 in ~~the nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~2015. Comparatively, deposit gathering provided net cash of ~~$6,352~~$24,855 for the same period of ~~2013. We continued~~2014. Short-term borrowings also declined $19,557 contributing to attract deposits from new and existing customers, including municipalities and school districts, as well as deposits gathered in relation to natural gas activity within existing markets in Susquehanna and Wyoming Countiesthe net use of ~~Pennsylvania.~~funds.

Operating activities provided net cash of ~~$14,902~~$7,361 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, and ~~$12,139~~$7,130 for the ~~corresponding nine~~same three months of ~~2013.~~2014. Net income, adjusted for the effects of gains and losses along with noncash transactions such as depreciation and the provision for loan losses, is the primary source of funds from operations.

Investing activities primarily include transactions related to our lending activities and investment portfolio. Investing activities ~~used~~provided net cash of ~~$53,464~~$32,631 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, compared to ~~$25,580~~using $1,199 for the same period of ~~2013.~~2014. In 2015, proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale brought in a significant amount of cash while in 2014, an increase in investment portfolio activities was the primary factor causing ~~the~~a net cash outflow from investing activities. ~~Comparatively, an increase in lending activities was the predominant factor causing the net cash outflow from investing activities in 2013.~~

We believe that our future liquidity needs will be satisfied through maintaining an adequate level of cash and cash equivalents, by maintaining readily available access to traditional funding sources, and through proceeds received from the investment and loan portfolios. The current sources of funds will enable us to meet all cash obligations as they come due.

Stockholders’ equity totaled ~~$246,069~~$249,458 or ~~$32.60~~$33.05 per share at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, compared to ~~$238,792~~$246,779 or ~~$31.62~~$32.69 per share at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. Net income of ~~$13,265~~$5,044 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was the primary factor leading to the improved capital position. Stockholders’ equity was also affected by cash dividends declared of ~~$7,021, common~~$2,341, stock ~~repurchases, including the retirement~~based compensation of ~~outstanding stock options, of $165, common stock issuances of $39, shares retired of $109,~~$18, and other comprehensive ~~income~~losses resulting from market value fluctuations in the investment portfolio of ~~$1,268.~~$42.

Dividends declared equaled ~~$0.93~~$0.31 per share infor the first quarter of 2015 and 2014, ~~and 2013. The~~representing a dividend payout ratio ~~was 52.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014~~of 46.4% in 2015 and ~~2013.~~49.8% in 2014. The ~~Merger Agreement~~merger agreement pursuant to which we merged with Penseco in 2013 contemplates that, unless 80 percent of our board of directors determines otherwise, we will pay a quarterly cash dividend in an amount no less than $0.31 per share through 2018, provided that sufficient funds are legally available, and that Peoples and Peoples Bank remain “Well-capitalized” in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to continue to pay cash dividends in the future. However, these decisions are affected by operating results, financial and economic decisions, capital and growth objectives, appropriate dividend restrictions and other relevant factors.

We attempt to assure capital adequacy by monitoring our current and projected capital positions to support future growth, while providing stockholders with an attractive long-term appreciation of their investments. According to bank regulation, at a minimum, banks must maintain a Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 4.0 percent and a total capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 8.0 percent. Additionally, banks must maintain a leverage ratio, defined as Tier 1 capital to total average assets less intangibles, of 3.0 percent. The minimum leverage ratio of 3.0 percent only applies to institutions with a composite rating of 1 under the Uniform Interagency Bank Rating System that are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk. An additional 100 to 200 basis points are required for all but these most highly-rated institutions. Our minimum Leverage ratio was 4.0 percent at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. If an institution is deemed to be undercapitalized under these standards, banking law prescribes an increasing amount of regulatory intervention, including the required institution of a capital restoration plan and restrictions on the growth of assets, branches or lines of business. Further restrictions are applied to significantly or critically undercapitalized institutions, including restrictions on interest payable on accounts, dismissal of management and appointment of a receiver. For well capitalized institutions, banking law provides authority for regulatory intervention where the institution is deemed to be engaging in unsafe and unsound practices or receives a less than satisfactory examination report rating.

In July 2013, the Board of Directors of the FRB approved the Basel III interim final rule (“Basel III”) which is intended to strengthen the quality and increase the required level of regulatory capital for a more stable and resilient banking system. The changes include: (i) a new regulatory capital measure, Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”), which is limited to capital elements of the highest quality; (ii) a new definition and increase of tier 1 capital which is now comprised of CET1 and Additional Tier 1; (iii) changes in calculation of some risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet exposure; and (iv) a capital conservation buffer that will limit capital distributions, stock redemptions, and certain discretionary bonus payments if the institution does not maintain capital in excess of the minimum capital requirements. These new capital rules took effect for our bank on January 1, 2015 and reporting began with the March 31, 2015 call report.

The adequacy of capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition and quality of resources and regulatory guidelines. We seek to maintain a level of capital sufficient to support existing assets and anticipated asset growth, maintain favorable access to capital markets, and preserve high quality credit ratings. At ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the Bank’s Tier 1 capital to total average assets was ~~10.24%~~10.88% as compared to ~~9.72%~~10.42% at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. The Bank’s Tier 1 capital to risk weighted asset ratio was ~~14.13%~~15.19% and the total capital to risk weighted asset ratio was ~~14.98%~~16.11% at ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. These ratios were ~~13.02%~~14.28% and ~~13.69%~~15.15% at December 31, ~~2013.~~2014. The Bank’s common equity Tier 1 to risk weighted asset ratio was 15.19 at March 31, 2015. The Bank was deemed to be well-capitalized under regulatory standards at ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015.

Net income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 equaled ~~$5,236~~$5,044 or ~~$0.70~~$0.67 per share compared to ~~$2,486~~$4,698 or ~~$0.56~~$0.62 per share for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2013. The results for the three months ended September 30, 2014, included pre-tax merger related expenses of $109. The comparable results in 2013 included pre-tax merger related expenses of $220. Per share data for 2013 are restated to reflect the merger exchange rates of 1.3636 shares.2014. Return on average assets (“ROA”) measures our net income in relation to total assets. Our ROA was 1.20% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 compared to ~~1.07%~~1.12% for the same period of ~~2013.~~2014. Return on average equity (“ROE”) indicates how effectively we ~~can~~ generate net income on the capital invested by stockholders. Our ROE was ~~8.49%~~8.28% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 compared to ~~7.37%~~8.01% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2013. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 equaled $13,265 or $1.76 per share compared to $7,851 or $1.76 per share for the same period of 2013.~~2014. The results for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 ~~include~~included pre-tax ~~merger~~acquisition related expenses of ~~approximately $1,725 compared to $225 for the same period in 2013. Our ROA and ROE~~$608. Gains on sale of investment securities were 1.04% and 7.37% through nine months in 2014 compared to 1.14% and 7.84% for the same period of 2013. The merger between Peoples and Penseco was accounted for as a reverse acquisition of Peoples by Penseco. As a result of the reverse merger, Peoples is the legal acquirer and Penseco is the accounting acquirer. In a reverse merger the historical financial statements are those of the accounting acquirer. Accordingly the earnings increase was primarily a result of adhering to the accounting treatment that requires the inclusion of results of operations of both Peoples and Penseco$832 thousand for the three ~~and nine month periods~~months ended ~~September 30, 2014, compared to Penseco on a standalone basis~~March 31, 2015, while there were no gains recognized for ~~same~~the comparable period ~~last year.~~in 2014.

Net interest income is still the fundamental source of earnings for commercial banks. ~~Fluctuations~~Moreover, fluctuations in the level of net interest income can have the greatest impact on net profits. Net interest income is defined as the difference between interest revenue, interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets, and interest expense, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities supporting those assets. The primary sources of earning assets are loans and investment securities, while interest-bearing deposits, short-term and long-term borrowings comprise interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted by:

Changes in net interest income are measured by the net interest spread and net interest margin. Net interest spread, the difference between the average yield earned on earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, illustrates the effects changing interest rates have on profitability. Net interest margin, net interest income as a percentage of earning assets, is a more comprehensive ratio, as it reflects not only the spread, but also the change in the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Tax-exempt loans and investments carry pre-tax yields lower than their taxable counterparts. Therefore, in order to make the analysis of net interest income more comparable, tax-exempt income and yields are reported herein on a tax-equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate of 35.0% ~~in 2014 and 34.0% in 2013.~~.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, tax-equivalent net interest income ~~increased $6,956~~decreased $706 to ~~$15,240~~$14,827 in ~~2014~~2015 from ~~$8,284~~$15,533 in ~~2013.~~2014. The net interest spread decreased to ~~3.69%~~3.74% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~3.72%~~3.94% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. The tax-equivalent net interest margin ~~decreased to 3.84%~~ for the ~~third quarter of 2014 from~~three months ended March 31 was 3.88% ~~for the comparable period of 2013.~~in 2015 compared to 4.09% in 2014. Loan accretion included in loan interest income in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 related to loans acquired in the fourth quarter of 2013 was ~~$469,~~$225, resulting in an increase in the tax-equivalent net interest margin of 126 basis points. Comparatively, loan accretion recognized in the first quarter of 2014 was $1,055 resulting in an increase in the tax-equivalent net interest margin of 28 basis points. Adjusting for the accretion, the tax equivalent net interest margin for the three months ended March 31 was 3.82% in 2015 and 3.81% in 2014. The tax-equivalent net interest margin for the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2014 was 3.73%, which included 14 basis points related to accretion on acquired loans. The yield curve continued to be relatively steep during 2014 as the Federal Reserve has maintained lower overnight and discount rates. Since deposit rates are affected by the short end of the yield curve and loan and securities rates tend to follow the long end of the yield curve, the continuation of the current interest rate environment may assist us3.79%.

(Dollars in ~~maintaining a stable net interest margin in the future.~~thousands, except per share data)

For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015, tax-equivalent interest income ~~on earning assets increased $7,646,~~decreased $858, to ~~$16,882 in 2014~~$16,362 as compared to ~~$9,236~~$17,220 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. A volume variance in ~~2013. The increase~~interest income of $2,766 attributable to changes in the average balance of earning assets was more than offset by a $3,624 unfavorable rate variance due to a reduction in the yield on earning assets. Specifically, the decrease was primarily due to ~~the growth in~~declining yields on average earning assets which ~~increased $730,237, to $1,576,582~~decreased 25 basis points for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 from ~~$846,345 for~~ the same period in ~~2013, primarily as a result of the merger.~~2014. The overall yield on earning assets, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, decreased ~~8 basis points~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014 at 4.25%~~March 31, 2015 to 4.28% as compared to ~~4.33%~~4.53% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. This was a result of the continuation of the low interest rate environment along with increased market competition. The yield earned on loans ~~increased 13~~decreased 44 basis points for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 to ~~4.89%~~4.70% from ~~4.76%~~5.14% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2013.~~2014. Average loans increased to ~~$1,184,102~~$1,225,769 for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~$650,808~~$1,181,481 for the same period in ~~2013.~~2014. The resulting tax-equivalent interest earned on loans was ~~$14,591~~$14,200 for the three month period ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~$7,813~~$14,978 for the same period in ~~2013, an increase~~2014, a decrease of ~~$6,778.~~$778.

Total interest expense ~~increased $690,~~decreased $152 to ~~$1,642~~$1,535 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$952~~$1,687 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013. This increase was attributable~~March 31, 2014. A favorable volume variance caused interest expenses to ~~the increase in the~~decrease $154. The average volume of interest bearing liabilities ~~comparing~~declined to $1,153,013 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014 and 2013. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $546,325,~~March 31, 2015, as compared to ~~$1,169,936 in the third quarter of 2014 from $623,611~~$1,166,766 for the ~~same period in 2013.~~three months ended March 31, 2014. The cost of funds decreased to ~~0.56%~~0.54% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to ~~0.61%~~0.59% for the same period in 2013. We continue to offer an above market rate on our certificate of savings account, which has attracted money that customers are not willing to invest elsewhere and has contributed to our continued growth.

For the nine months ended September 30, tax-equivalent net interest income increased $20,251 to $45,241 in 2014 from $24,990 in 2013. The net interest spread decreased to 3.73% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from 3.78% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The tax-equivalent net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30 was 3.88% in 2014 compared to 3.94% in 2013. Loan accretion included in loan interest income in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 related to loans acquired in the fourth quarter of 2013 was $1,900, resulting in an increase in the tax-equivalent net interest margin of 20 basis points.

For the nine months ended September 30, tax-equivalent interest income increased $22,361, to $50,297 in 2014 from $27,936 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to the growth in average earning assets which increased $710,854 to $1,558,528 in 2014 from $847,674 for the same period in 2013. The yield on earning assets, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to 4.31% as compared to 4.41% in 2013. The tax-equivalent yield earned on loans decreased 2 basis points through the third quarter of 2014 to 4.91% from 4.93% for the same period of 2013. Average loans increased $543,393, to $1,184,393 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $641,000 for the same period in 2013. The resulting tax-equivalent interest earned on loans was $43,507 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 compared to $23,652 for the same period in 2013, an increase of $19,855. The tax-equivalent yield earned on investments decreased 56 basis points for the nine months of 2014 to 2.70% from 3.26% for the same period of 2013. Average investments increased to $331,211 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $172,824 for the same period in 2013. The resulting tax-equivalent interest earned on investments was $6,697 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 compared to $4,216 for the same period in 2013, an increase of $2,481.

Total interest expense increased $2,110, to $5,056 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $2,946 at September 30, 2013. The increase was the result of an increase in the average volume of interest bearing liabilities comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Average interest bearing liabilities increased to $1,169,674 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $629,260 at September 30, 2013. The increase in average interest bearing liabilities more than offset a favorable rate variance as the cost of funds decreased to 0.58% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to 0.63% for the same period in 2013.2014.

The average balances of assets and liabilities, corresponding interest income and expense and resulting average yields or rates paid are summarized as follows. Averages for earning assets include nonaccrual loans. Investment averages include available-for-sale securities at amortized cost. Income on investment securities and loans is adjusted to a ~~tax-equivalent~~tax equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate of ~~35.0% in 2014 and 34.0% in 2013.~~35%.


	Nine months ended																		Three months ended
	September 2014							September 2013							March 2015							March 2014
	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate
Assets:
Earning assets:
Loans
Taxable	$	1,116,432	$	41,035		4.91	%	$	589,119	$	21,819		4.95	%	$	1,155,435	$	13,340		4.68	%	$	1,096,793	$	14,000		5.18	%
Tax exempt		67,961		2,472		4.86			51,881		1,833		4.72			70,334		860		4.96			84,688		978		4.69
Investments
Taxable		231,457		2,909		1.68			111,168		1,296		1.56			219,360		909		1.68			216,173		944		1.77
Tax exempt		99,754		3,788		5.08			61,656		2,920		6.33			93,715		1,238		5.36			103,625		1,274		4.99
Interest bearing deposits		5,843		29		0.66			33,850		68		0.27			2,718		8		1.19			7,327		10		0.55
Federal funds sold		37,081		64		0.23										8,674		7		0.33			32,444		14		0.18

Total earning assets		1,558,528		50,297		4.31	%		847,674		27,936		4.41	%		1,550,236		16,362		4.28	%		1,541,050		17,220		4.53	%
Less: allowance for loan losses		9,162							7,160							10,447							8,495
Other assets		161,730							82,722							171,550							162,515

Total assets	$	1,711,096						$	923,236							1,711,339						$	1,695,070

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Money market accounts		213,230		596		0.37	%		173,030		304		0.23	%	$	197,795		188		0.39	%	$	217,123		173		0.32	%
NOW accounts		225,328		577		0.34			106,634		159		0.20			251,628		225		0.36			210,997		183		0.35
Savings accounts		374,351		770		0.28			129,414		58		0.06			399,069		250		0.25			377,535		270		0.29
Time deposits less than $100		211,966		1,542		0.97			90,912		663		0.98			170,998		449		1.06			175,625		402		0.93
Time deposits $100 or more		93,226		640		0.92			83,394		784		1.26			90,424		156		0.70			127,805		329		1.04
Short term borrowings		16,160		67		0.55			8,183		16		0.26			10,373		8		0.31			21,351		34		0.65
Long-term debt		35,413		864		3.26			37,693		962		3.41			32,726		259		3.21			36,330		296		3.30
Total interest bearing liabilities																1,153,013		1,535		0.54	%		1,166,766		1,687		0.59	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		1,169,674		5,056		0.58	%		629,260		2,946		0.63	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		288,786							147,099							298,166							274,584
Other liabilities		12,143							13,002							13,240							15,767
Stockholders’ equity		240,493							133,875							246,920							237,953

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,711,096						$	923,236						$	1,711,339						$	1,695,070

Net interest income/spread			$	45,241		3.73	%			$	24,990		3.78	%			$	14,827		3.74	%			$	15,533		3.94	%

Net interest margin						3.88	%						3.94	%						3.88	%						4.09	%
Tax-equivalent adjustments:
Tax equivalent adjustments:
Loans			$	865						$	623						$	301						$	343
Investments				1,326							993							433							445

Total adjustments			$	2,191						$	1,616						$	734						$	788

We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account on a quarterly basis utilizing our systematic analysis in accordance with procedural discipline. We take into consideration certain factors such as composition of the loan portfolio, volumes of nonperforming loans, volumes of net charge-offs, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors when determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account. We make monthly provisions to the allowance for loan losses account in order to maintain the allowance at the appropriate level indicated by our evaluations. Based on our most current evaluation, we believe that the allowance is adequate to absorb any known and inherent losses in the portfolio as of ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the provision for loan losses totaled ~~$666~~$750. The provision for loan losses was $857 for the same period in 2014. Nonperforming assets totaled $11,297 at March 31, 2015 and ~~$2,724, compared~~$15,263 at March 31, 2014. The decrease in nonperforming assets was the main contributor to ~~$525 and $1,325 for those same periods in 2013. The increase in~~ the quarter-to-date and year-to-date provisions comparing 2014 and 2013 reflect a higher volume and concentration of commercial real estate loans in the portfolio, as well as continued weakness in the economic environment.decreased provision.

Noninterest income for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~increased $1,353~~rose $749 or ~~44.7%~~21.0% to ~~$4,380~~$4,309 in ~~2014~~2015 from ~~$3,027~~$3,560 in ~~2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, noninterest income totaled $11,718, an increase of $2,808 or 31.5% from $8,910 for the comparable period of 2013.~~2014. Service charges, fees and commissions ~~increased $1,389 or 40.5%~~decreased $12. Merchant services income decreased $104 to ~~$4,815 through nine months~~$790 for the first quarter of 2015 in ~~2014 from $3,426~~comparison to $894 for the same period in ~~2013. The increase is attributable primarily~~2014 as the monthly discount income accrual was reduced due to ~~the merger.~~a lower volume of transactions. Income generated from commissions and fees on fiduciary and wealth management activities ~~increased $409~~decreased $90 to ~~$1,690~~$664 for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014 in comparison~~first quarter of 2015 compared to ~~$1,281~~$754 for the ~~same~~first quarter of 2014. Mortgage banking income increased $123 to $222 for the first quarter of 2015 compared to $99 for the comparable period in ~~2013~~2014 as loans originated for sale volumes improved. This was due to ~~an increase~~a decline in 30 year mortgage rates which remained below 4.00% during the ~~fee structure implemented in the second half~~first three months of 2013. Income generated from our wealth management division increased $249 to $569 through the third quarter of 2014 in comparison to $320 over that same period in 2013. Life insurance investment income increased $209 or 58.7% to $565 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $356 for the same period in 2013. This increase is again attributable primarily to the merger as both companies carried bank owned life insurance covering their employees. Merchant services income decreased $339 to $2,784 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $3,123 for the same period last year as a result of lower transaction volumes and a decrease in the number of merchant accounts serviced.2015. Gains ~~from the~~on sale of investment securities ~~available-for-sale totaled $861~~were $832 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014 compared to $158~~March 31, 2015, while there were no gains recognized for the ~~same~~comparable period in 2013 as we took advantage of opportunities to sell longer term investments at higher yields and reinvest those funds at shorter durations. Cash flows from the investment portfolio will be utilized to fund loan demand.

In general, noninterest expense is categorized into three main groups: employee-related expenses, occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses. Employee-related expenses are costs associated with providing salaries, including payroll taxes and benefits, to our employees. Occupancy and equipment expenses, the costs related to the maintenance of facilities and equipment, include depreciation, general maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, rental expense offset by any rental income, and utility costs. Other expenses include general operating expenses such as advertising, contractual services, insurance, including FDIC assessment, other taxes and supplies. Several of these costs and expenses are variable while the remainder are fixed. We utilize budgets and other related strategies in an effort to control the variable expenses.

For the ~~third~~first quarter of 2015, noninterest expense ~~increased $3,719~~decreased $193 or ~~50.5%~~1.7% to ~~$11,084~~$11,094 in ~~2014~~2015 from ~~$7,365~~$11,287 in ~~2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014,~~2014. There were two categories of noninterest expense that increased ~~$13,264 or 62.1%~~in the first quarter of 2015 when compared to ~~$34,610 in~~the same period of 2014, ~~from $21,346 in 2013. Personnel costs increased 42.9%,~~employee related expenses and net occupancy and equipment ~~costs increased 178.0%~~costs. Merchant services expense, amortization of intangible assets and other expenses ~~increased by 43.7%~~all decreased when comparing ~~year-to-date 2014~~the first quarters of 2015 and ~~2013.~~2014.

Salaries and employee benefits expense, which comprise the majority of noninterest expense, totaled ~~$4,754~~$5,233 for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014, an increase of $1,414~~2015. The $65 or 42.3% when compared to the third quarter of 2013. Salaries and employee benefits expense totaled $14,883 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to $10,415 for the same period of 2013. The $4,468 or 42.9%1.3% increase was a result of employee benefit costs when comparing the ~~staffing~~two periods.

We experienced a $735 or 42.4% increase in net occupancy and equipment expense comparing the first quarters of 2015 and 2014. The increase in net occupancy and equipment expense was caused by multiple contributing factors. First and foremost, the ~~merged company to that~~first quarter of 2015 includes costs associated with the ~~standalone accounting acquirer. Also included~~Lehigh Valley branch which had no comparable expense in the ~~2014 total~~corresponding period in 2014. Additionally, the northeast experienced a harsh winter in 2015. Costs associated with snow removal and clean up to the 26 locations were ~~payments~~increased when comparing the first three months of ~~$301 representing stock appreciation rights settled in cash~~2015 and ~~conversion bonuses totaling $315 settled in cash.~~2014.

Merchant services expense decreased ~~$78~~$32 or ~~10.5%~~5.7% to ~~$662~~$533 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$740~~$565 for the same period in ~~2013. Merchant services expense decreased $225 or 11.6% to $1,722 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from $1,947 for the year earlier period. Both the quarterly and nine month results were~~2014. The decrease was a product of lower transaction volumes and a decrease in the number of college book store merchant accounts serviced.

~~We experienced~~ The expense side of merchant services has a $1,335 or 194.9% increase in net occupancy and equipment expense comparing the third quarters of 2014 at $2,020 and 2013 at $685. Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $3,893 or 178.1% comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 at $6,080 and $2,187. In additiondirect correlation to ~~increases related to the combined entity, increased depreciation expense and other costs related to equipment and computer systems caused the increase between comparable periods.~~merchant services income.

For the ~~third~~first quarter, other expenses ~~increased $880~~decreased $315 or ~~37.9%~~11.0% comparing 2015 to $3,205 from $2,325 comparing 2014 to 2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, other expenses increased $2,793 or 43.7% to $9,190 as compared to $6,397 for the same period of 2013. This increase2014. The decrease was the result of ~~comparing~~realizing cost synergies associated with the ~~combined company in 2014 to Penseco only~~2013 merger with Penseco.

We recorded income tax expense of $1,514 or 23.1% of pre-tax income, and $1,463 or 23.7% of pre-tax income for the ~~comparable period in 2013.~~

~~Acquisition related expenses incurred~~quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. The reduction in the ~~third quarter~~effective tax rate is a result of ~~2014 totaled $109. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, acquisition related expenses totaled $1,725.~~recognizing tax credits associated with a limited partnership investment offset by a reduction in tax-exempt income.

We recorded income tax expense of $1,944 or 27.1% of pre-tax income, and $392 or 13.6% of pre-tax income for the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. We recorded income tax expense of $4,169 or 23.9% of pre-tax income, and $1,762 or 18.3% of pre-tax income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The higher effective tax rate for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 is due to proportionately lower ratio of tax exempt interest income to total income when compared to those same periods in 2013.

Market risk is the risk to our earnings and/or financial position resulting from adverse changes in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Our exposure to market risk is primarily interest rate risk (“IRR”), which arises from our lending, investing and deposit gathering activities. Our market risk sensitive instruments consist of non-derivative financial instruments, none of which are entered into for trading purposes. During the normal course of business, we are not exposed to foreign exchange risk or commodity price risk. Our exposure to IRR can be explained as the potential for change in reported earnings and/or the market value of net worth. Variations in interest rates affect the underlying economic value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items. These changes arise because the present value of future cash flows, and often the cash flows themselves, change with interest rates. The effects of the changes in these present values reflect the change in our underlying economic value, and provide a basis for the expected change in future earnings related to interest rates. Interest rate changes affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive income and operating expenses. IRR is inherent in the role of banks as financial intermediaries.

A bank with a high degree of IRR may experience lower earnings, impaired liquidity and capital positions, and most likely, a greater risk of insolvency. Therefore, banks must carefully evaluate IRR to promote safety and soundness in their activities.

The overnight borrowing rate has been subject to a range of 0% to 0.25% since the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) adopted their accommodative monetary policy. The FOMC has acted to drive longer term rates to historic lows and operate as a backstop to the financial industry through direct infusions of capital by implementing their quantitative easing policies.

~~The~~ projected impact of instantaneous changes in interest rates on our net interest income and economic value of equity at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, based on our simulation model, is summarized as follows:


	September 30, 2014 % Change in												March 31, 2015 % Change in
Changes in Interest Rates (basis points)	Net Interest Income						Economic Value of Equity						Net Interest Income						Economic Value of Equity
	Metric			Policy			Metric			Policy			Metric			Policy			Metric			Policy
+400		4.9	%		(40	%)		2.2	%		(45	%)		8.8			(20.0	)		11.1			(45.0	)
+300		4.1	%		(30	%)		2.7	%		(35	%)		7.1			(20.0	)		10.1			(35.0	)
+200		2.7	%		(20	%)		2.3	%		(25	%)		4.9			(10.0	)		7.8			(25.0	)
+100		1.3	%		(10	%)		1.9	%		(15	%)		2.4			(10.0	)		4.9			(15.0	)
Static
-100		(2.4	%)		(10	%)		(9.9	%)		(15	%)		(2.9	)		(10.0	)		(13.7	)		(15.0	)

Our simulation model creates pro forma net interest income scenarios under various interest rate shocks. Given instantaneous and parallel shifts in general market rates of plus 100 basis points, our projected net interest income for the 12 months ending ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, would increase slightly at ~~1.3%~~2.4 percent from model results using current interest rates. Additional disclosures about market risk are included in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, under the heading “Market Risk Sensitivity,” and are incorporated into this Item 3 by reference. ~~There were no material changes in our market risk from December 31, 2013.~~

At ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures, at ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes made in the Company’s internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting.

The nature of the Company’s business generates a certain amount of litigation involving matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, there ~~were~~are no legal proceedings that ~~had or~~ might have a material effect on the consolidated results of operations, liquidity, or the financial position of the Company, in ~~2014~~2015 and through the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

~~There have been no~~No material changes from ~~the risk factors~~those previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

On January ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, the Board of Directors ~~authorized~~reauthorized the repurchase of 370,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The following purchases were made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 10b-18(a) (3), of the Company’s common stock during each of the three months ~~for the quarter~~ ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. At ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, there were 368,200 shares available for repurchase under the ~~2014~~2015 Stock Repurchase Program with an expiration date of December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto, duly authorized.


Pennsylvania		23-2391852
(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer ID Number)

150 North Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA		18503
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)


Contents		Page No.

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014		3

	Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~		4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~		5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~		6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		78

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2628

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4544

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		4645

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		4645

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		4645

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		4746

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		4746

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		4746

Item 5.	Other Information		4746

Item 6.	Exhibits		4746

	Signatures		4847


	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Net unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale	$	4,760		$	2,810
Related income taxes		(1,666	)		(984	)

Net of income taxes		3,094			1,826

Benefit plan adjustments		(3,883	)		(3,883	)
Related income taxes		1,359			1,359

Net of income taxes		(2,524	)		(2,524	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	570		$	(698	)


	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Net unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale	$	6,227		$	6,292
Related income taxes		2,179			2,202

Net of income taxes		4,048			4,090

Benefit plan adjustments		(7,567	)		(7,567	)
Related income taxes		(2,648	)		(2,648	)

Net of income taxes		(4,919	)		(4,919	)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(871	)	$	(829	)


	2015				2014
For the three months ended March 31	Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted
Net Income (Numerator)	$	5,044	$	5,044	$	4,698	$	4,698
Average common shares outstanding (Denominator)		7,548,358		7,548,358		7,550,253		7,580,480
Earnings per share	$	0.67	$	0.67	$	0.62	$	0.62


	2014				2013
For the three months ended September 30	Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted
Net Income (Numerator)	$	5,236	$	5,236	$	2,486	$	2,486
Average common shares outstanding (Denominator)		7,548,358		7,548,358		4,473,846		4,473,846
Earnings per share	$	0.70	$	0.70	$	0.56	$	0.56

	2014				2013
For the nine months ended September 30	Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted
Net Income (Numerator)	$	13,265	$	13,265	$	7,851	$	7,851
Average common shares outstanding (Denominator)		7,548,983		7,566,456		4,469,480		4,469,480
Earnings per share	$	1.76	$	1.76	$	1.76	$	1.76


December 31, 2014:	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful	Total
Commercial	$	306,066	$	6,135	$	7,389		$	319,590
Real estate:
Commercial		472,270		9,858		11,353			493,481
Residential		300,299		2,123		8,245			310,667
Consumer		86,037		13		106			86,156

Total	$	1,164,672	$	18,129	$	27,093		$	1,209,894


							For the Year Ended
December 31, 2013	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial	$	4,978	$	9,474			$	5,824
Real estate:
Commercial		10,496		13,352				10,095
Residential		3,004		3,437				2,614
Consumer		90		90				95

Total		18,568		26,353				18,628

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		2,200		2,200	$	1,500		2,182	$	95
Real estate:
Commercial		1,394		1,394		300		1,409		76
Residential		784		784		224		672		13
Consumer

Total		4,378		4,378		2,024		4,263		184

Commercial		7,178		11,674		1,500		8,006		95
Real estate:
Commercial		11,890		14,746		300		11,504		76
Residential		3,788		4,221		224		3,286		13
Consumer		90		90				95

Total	$	22,946	$	30,731	$	2,024	$	22,891	$	184


	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Life Insurance Benefits
Nine months ended September 30,	2014			2013			2014	2013
Net periodic pension cost:
Service cost								$	32
Interest cost	$	507		$	485				100
Expected return on plan assets		(681	)		(620	)
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		69			135				86

Net periodic pension cost	$	(105	)	$				$	218


	September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
United States		5.9	%		7.2	%
Pennsylvania (statewide)		4.9	%		6.8	%
Lackawanna county		7.3	%		8.1	%
Luzerne county		7.4	%		8.5	%
Monroe county		7.5	%		8.9	%
Susquehanna county		4.9	%		5.8	%
Wayne county		5.1	%		6.3	%
Wyoming county		6.7	%		7.9	%
New York (statewide)		5.6	%		7.4	%
Broome county		6.4	%		7.4	%


MONTH	Total number of of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
~~MONTH~~
~~July~~January 1, ~~2014~~2015 – ~~July~~January 31, ~~2014~~2015					368,200
~~August, 2014~~February 1, 2015 – ~~August 31, 2014~~February 28, 2015					368,200
~~September~~March 1, ~~2014~~2015 – ~~September 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015					368,200

~~Total~~TOTAL


10.1
~~31.1~~		~~Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).~~Employment Agreement dated as of February 4, 2015 between Peoples Security Bank and Trust Company and Bradley S. Grubb.

~~31.2~~31 (i)		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ~~certification~~certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

32		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications pursuant to Section 1350.

101+		Interactive Data File


		Peoples Financial Services Corp.
		(Registrant)

Date: ~~November 7, 2014~~	May 8, 2015		/s/ Craig W. Best
		Craig W. Best
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ~~November 7, 2014~~	May 8, 2015		/s/ Scott A. Seasock
		Scott A. Seasock
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ~~(Principal~~ (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


Item Number	Description	Page		Description	Page

10.1				Employment Agreement dated as of February 4, 2015 between Peoples Security Bank and Trust Company and Bradley S. Grubb.		49

31.1	CEO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (a) /15d-14 (a).		50	CEO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (a) /15d-14 (a).		65

31.2	CFO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 (a) /15d-14 (a).		51	CFO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).		66

32	CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350.		52	CEO and CFO Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350.		67

101	The following materials from Peoples Financial Services Corp. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.			The following materials from Peoples Financial Services Corp. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company