Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x
ýQuarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended AprilJuly 4, 2015

or

¨Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission File Number 0-7087

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York 16-0959303

New York
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

16-0959303
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 

(IRS Employer

Identification Number)

130 Commerce Way, East Aurora, New York
14052
(Address of principal executive offices)
14052
(Zip code)

(716) 805-1599

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

$.01 par value Common Stock, $.01 par value Class B Stock

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  xý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  xý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, an “accelerated filer”, a “non-accelerated filer” and a “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerxý Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
 Smaller Reporting Company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  xý

As of AprilJuly 4, 2015, 22,079,48222,126,070 shares of common stock were outstanding consisting of 17,087,18017,270,738 shares of common stock ($.01 par value) and 4,992,3024,855,332 shares of Class B common stock ($.01 par value).



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   PAGE

PART 1

Item 1

7-16
7-18

Item 2

17
18 – 2226

Item 3

22

Item 4

23

PART II

Item 1

24

Item 1a

24

Item 2

25

Item 3

25

Item 4

25

Item 5

25

Item 6

25

26


2


Part 1 – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets

April

July 4, 2015 with Comparative Figures for December 31, 2014

(In thousands)

   April 4,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 
   (Unaudited)    

Current Assets:

   

Cash and Cash Equivalents

  $22,563   $21,197  

Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

   76,346    88,888  

Inventories

   120,784    115,053  

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

   17,628    20,680  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

 237,321   245,818  

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation

 124,917   116,316  

Other Assets

 6,382   5,632  

Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization

 112,033   94,991  

Goodwill

 119,630   100,153  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Assets

$600,283  $562,910  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

Current Maturities of Long-term Debt

$2,658  $2,796  

Accounts Payable

 34,875   27,903  

Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

 31,063   33,465  

Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue

 37,039   45,052  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

 105,635   109,216  

Long-term Debt

 214,099   180,212  

Other Liabilities

 43,558   45,305  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 363,292   334,733  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Shareholders’ Equity:

Common Stock

 221   219  

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 (15,434 (11,949

Other Shareholders’ Equity

 252,204   239,907  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Shareholders’ Equity

 236,991   228,177  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

$600,283  $562,910  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 July 4,
2015
 December 31,
2014
 (Unaudited)  
Current Assets:   
Cash and Cash Equivalents$23,767
 $21,197
Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts98,836
 88,888
Inventories133,418
 115,053
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets18,057
 20,680
Total Current Assets274,078
 245,818
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation126,329
 116,316
Other Assets8,995
 5,632
Intangible Assets, Net of Accumulated Amortization114,230
 94,991
Goodwill114,578
 100,153
Total Assets$638,210
 $562,910
Current Liabilities:   
Current Maturities of Long-term Debt$2,702
 $2,796
Accounts Payable38,609
 27,903
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities35,996
 33,465
Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue32,588
 45,052
Total Current Liabilities109,895
 109,216
Long-term Debt228,469
 180,212
Other Liabilities43,698
 45,305
Total Liabilities382,062
 334,733
Shareholders’ Equity:   
Common Stock222
 219
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(14,840) (11,949)
Other Shareholders’ Equity270,766
 239,907
Total Shareholders’ Equity256,148
 228,177
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$638,210
 $562,910
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.


3

Table of Contents

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 With Comparative Figures for 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

   Three Months Ended 
   April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Sales

  $161,638    $140,951  

Cost of Products Sold

   121,476     110,946  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross Profit

 40,162   30,005  

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 22,619   16,378  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from Operations

 17,543   13,627  

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income

 1,246   2,323  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income Before Income Taxes

 16,297   11,304  

Provision for Income Taxes

 5,614   3,797  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income

$10,683  $7,507  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

Basic

$0.49  $0.35  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

$0.47  $0.33  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Sales$334,794
 $315,514
 $173,156
 $174,563
Cost of Products Sold245,180
 242,307
 123,704
 131,361
Gross Profit89,614
 73,207
 49,452
 43,202
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses43,916
 37,099
 21,297
 20,721
Income from Operations45,698
 36,108
 28,155
 22,481
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income2,357
 4,882
 1,111
 2,559
Income Before Income Taxes43,341
 31,226
 27,044
 19,922
Provision for Income Taxes14,968
 10,575
 9,354
 6,778
Net Income$28,373
 $20,651
 $17,690
 $13,144
Earnings Per Share:       
Basic$1.29
 $0.96
 $0.80
 $0.61
Diluted$1.24
 $0.91
 $0.77
 $0.58
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.


4

Table of Contents

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income

Three and Six Months Ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 With Comparative Figures for 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

   Three Months Ended 
   April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Net Income

  $10,683   $7,507  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Loss:

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments

 (3,646 (386

Change in Accumulated Income on Derivatives – Net of Tax

 —     20  

Retirement Liability Adjustment – Net of Tax

 161   102  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Loss

 (3,485 (264
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income

$7,198  $7,243  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Net Income$28,373
 $20,651
 $17,690
 $13,144
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:       
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments(3,214) (568) 432
 (182)
Change in Accumulated Loss on Derivatives – Net of Tax
 (8) 
 (28)
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Net of Tax323
 208
 162
 106
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income(2,891) (368) 594
 (104)
Comprehensive Income$25,482
 $20,283
 $18,284
 $13,040
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.


5

Table of Contents

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

Three

Six Months Ended AprilJuly 4, 2015

With Comparative Figures for 2014

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

   April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

   

Net Income

  $10,683   $7,507  

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided By Operating Activities:

   

Depreciation and Amortization

   6,127    4,838  

Provisions for Non-Cash Losses on Inventory and Receivables

   (74  312  

Stock Compensation Expense

   506    394  

Deferred Tax Benefit

   (40  (816

Other

   110    (879

Cash Flows from Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:

   

Accounts Receivable

   18,563    (37,632

Inventories

   (3,474  8,699  

Accounts Payable

   5,517    9,520  

Accrued Expenses

   (4,535  (1,275

Other Current Assets and Liabilities

   (633  (382

Customer Advanced Payments and Deferred Revenue

   (8,796  9,203  

Income Taxes

   2,416    2,776  

Supplemental Retirement and Other Liabilities

   409    308  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Provided By Operating Activities

 26,779   2,573  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

Acquisition of Business, Net of Cash Acquired

 (52,615 (70,275

Capital Expenditures

 (7,059 (16,906

Other Investing Activities

 (300 —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Used For Investing Activities

 (59,974 (87,181
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

Proceeds from Long-term Debt

 40,000   58,000  

Payments for Long-term Debt

 (5,663 (405

Debt Acquisition Costs

 —     (280

Acquisition Earnout Payments

 —     (53

Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options

 402   588  

Income Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options

 708   1,261  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Provided By Financing Activities

 35,447   59,111  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash

 (886 (21
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 1,366   (25,518

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

 21,197   54,635  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

$22,563  $29,117  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:   
Net Income$28,373
 $20,651
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided By Operating Activities:   
Depreciation and Amortization12,545
 10,309
Provisions for Non-Cash Losses on Inventory and Receivables957
 510
Stock Compensation Expense1,143
 866
Deferred Tax Benefit(576) (2,765)
Non-Cash Earnout Liability Adjustment(1,268) (83)
Other158
 (565)
Cash Flows from Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:   
Accounts Receivable(3,797) (33,723)
Inventories(16,786) 17,736
Accounts Payable9,192
 3,702
Accrued Expenses(857) 760
Other Current Assets and Liabilities(352) (1,319)
Customer Advanced Payments and Deferred Revenue(13,287) 3,852
Income Taxes4,610
 2,684
Supplemental Retirement and Other Liabilities820
 615
Cash Provided By Operating Activities20,875
 23,230
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:   
Acquisition of Business, Net of Cash Acquired(52,615) (67,851)
Capital Expenditures(12,277) (23,091)
Other Investing Activities(2,678) 
Cash Used For Investing Activities(67,570) (90,942)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:   
Proceeds from Long-term Debt55,000
 58,150
Payments for Long-term Debt(6,331) (25,883)
Debt Acquisition Costs
 (280)
Acquisition Earnout Payments(2) (42)
Proceeds from Exercise of Stock Options638
 804
Income Tax Benefit from Exercise of Stock Options708
 1,261
Cash Provided By Financing Activities50,013
 34,010
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash(748) (108)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents2,570
 (33,810)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period21,197
 54,635
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$23,767
 $20,825
See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.


6

Table of Contents

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

April

July 4, 2015

(Unaudited)

1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Operating Results

The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Operating results for the three month periodand six months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Astronics Corporation’s 2014 annual report on Form 10-K.

Description of the Business

Astronics Corporation (“Astronics” or the “Company”) is a leading supplier of products to the global aerospace, defense, electronics and semiconductor industries. Our products and services include advanced, high-performance electrical power generation & distribution systems, lighting & safety systems, avionics products, aircraft structures, engineering design and systems certification and automated test systems.

We have operations in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada and France. We design and build our products through our wholly owned subsidiaries Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp. (“AES”); Astronics AeroSat Corporation (“AeroSat”); Ballard Technology, Inc. (“Ballard”); DME Corporation (“DME”); Luminescent Systems, Inc. (“LSI”); Luminescent Systems Canada, Inc. (“LSI Canada”); Max-Viz, Inc. (“Max-Viz”); Peco, Inc. (“Peco”); PGA Electronic s.a. (“PGA”); Astronics Test Systems, Inc. (“ATS”) and Armstrong Aerospace, Inc. (“Armstrong”).

On January 14, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of Armstrong, located in Itasca, Illinois. Armstrong is a leading provider of engineering, design and systems certification solutions for commercial aircraft, specializing in connectivity, in-flight entertainment, and electrical power systems. Armstrong is included in our Aerospace segment.

On February 28, 2014, Astronics acquired, through a wholly owned subsidiary ATS, certain assets and liabilities of EADS North America’s Test and Services division, located in Irvine, California. ATS is a leading provider of highly engineered automated test systems, subsystems and instruments for commercial electronics and semiconductor products to both the commercial and defense industries. ATS is included in our Test Systems segment.

Cost of Products Sold, Engineering and Development and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Cost of products sold includes the costs to manufacture products such as direct materials and labor and manufacturing overhead as well as all engineering and developmental costs. The Company is engaged in a variety of engineering and design activities as well as basic research and development activities directed to the substantial improvement or new application of the Company’s existing technologies. These costs are expensed when incurred and included in cost of products sold. Research and development, design and related engineering amounted to $22.2$21.3 million and $17.2$20.6 million for the three months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014, respectively, and $43.6 million and $37.9 million for the six months ended July 4, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs primarily related to our sales and marketing departments and administrative departments. Interest expense is shown net of interest income. Interest income was insignificant for the three and six months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014.


7


Derivatives

In November 2014, the Company terminated its interest rate swap. Ineffectiveness was not significant for the three month periodand six months ended March 29,June 28, 2014. The Company classified the cash flows from hedging transactions in the same category as the cash flows from the respective hedged items. No derivative instruments were outstanding at or for the three month periodor six months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company accounts for its foreign currency translation in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 830,Foreign Currency Translation. The aggregate transaction gain or loss included in operations was insignificant for the periods ending Aprilthree and six months ended July 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014.

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies may from time to time arise from situations such as claims and other legal actions. Loss contingencies are recorded as liabilities when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Disclosure is required when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the recorded provision. Contingent liabilities are often resolved over long time periods. In recording liabilities for probable losses, management is required to make estimates and judgments regarding the amount or range of the probable loss. Management continually assesses the adequacy of estimated loss contingencies and, if necessary, adjusts the amounts recorded as better information becomes known.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2015

There have been no recent accounting pronouncements that have had an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Reclassification of Prior Year Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.
2) Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined in accordance with the first-in, first-out method. Inventories are as follows:

(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

Finished Goods

  $33,021    $28,763  

Work in Progress

   25,134     28,488  

Raw Material

   62,629     57,802  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
$120,784  $115,053  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 December 31,
2014
Finished Goods$32,784
 $28,763
Work in Progress31,202
 28,488
Raw Material69,432
 57,802
 $133,418
 $115,053


8


3) Property, Plant and Equipment

The following table summarizes Property, Plant and Equipment as follows:

(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

Land

  $11,258    $10,008  

Buildings and Improvements

   76,314     74,755  

Machinery and Equipment

   79,126     73,062  

Construction in Progress

   7,447     4,757  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
 174,145   162,582  

Less Accumulated Depreciation

 49,228   46,266  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
$124,917  $116,316  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 December 31,
2014
Land$11,162
 $10,008
Buildings and Improvements78,900
 74,755
Machinery and Equipment83,380
 73,062
Construction in Progress5,417
 4,757
 178,859
 162,582
Less Accumulated Depreciation52,530
 46,266
 $126,329
 $116,316
4) Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes acquired intangible assets as follows:

    April 4, 2015   December 31, 2014 
(In thousands)  Weighted
Average Life
   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
 

Patents

   6 Years    $2,146    $1,124    $2,146    $1,077  

Trade Names

   9 Years     8,217     1,472     8,304     1,288  

Completed and Unpatented Technology

   7 Years     17,957     4,852     18,107     4,396  

Backlog and Customer Relationships

   12 Years     113,539     22,378     93,448     20,253  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Intangible Assets

 8 Years  $141,859  $29,826  $122,005  $27,014  
    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

  July 4, 2015 December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Weighted
Average Life
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Patents6 Years $2,146
 $1,171
 $2,146
 $1,077
Non-compete Agreement5 Years 2,600
 238
 
 
Trade Names9 Years 10,230
 1,748
 8,304
 1,288
Completed and Unpatented Technology7 Years 24,079
 5,584
 18,107
 4,396
Backlog and Customer Relationships12 Years 107,928
 24,012
 93,448
 20,253
Total Intangible Assets8 Years $146,983
 $32,753
 $122,005
 $27,014
All acquired intangible assets other than goodwill and one trade name are being amortized. Amortization expense for acquired intangibles is summarized as follows:

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Amortization Expense

  $2,852    $2,467  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Amortization Expense$5,772
 $4,904
 $2,920
 $2,437
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets expected for 2015 and for each of the next five years is summarized as follows:

(In thousands)    

2015

  $11,100  

2016

   10,710  

2017

   10,293  

2018

   9,980  

2019

   9,579  

2020

   9,524  

(In thousands) 
2015$11,452
201610,791
201710,361
201810,048
20199,647
20209,094


The Company also incurs amortization expense related to other assets. Such amortization expense was not significant in the three or six months ended July 4, 2015 and June 28, 2014.

9



5) Goodwill

The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2015:

(In thousands)  December 31,
2014
   Acquisition   Foreign
Currency
Translation
   April 4,
2015
 

Aerospace

  $100,153    $20,325    $(848  $119,630  

Test Systems

   —       —       —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
$100,153  $20,325  $(848$119,630  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(In thousands)December 31,
2014
 Acquisition 
Foreign
Currency
Translation
 July 4,
2015
Aerospace$100,153
 $15,174
 $(749) $114,578
Test Systems
 
 
 
 $100,153
 $15,174
 $(749) $114,578

During the three months ended July 4, 2015, approximately $5.1 million was reclassified from goodwill to intangible assets as the Company continues the evaluation of the purchase price allocation of Armstrong.
6) Long-term Debt and Notes Payable

The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement as amended are jointly and severally guaranteed by each domestic subsidiary of the Company other than a non-material subsidiary. The obligations are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ assets.

In connection with the funding of the acquisition of ATS, the Company amended its existing credit facility to exercise its option to increase the revolving credit commitment. The credit agreement provided for a $125 million, five-year revolving credit facility maturing on June 30, 2018, of which $58.0 million was drawn to finance the acquisition. In addition, the Company was required to pay a commitment fee quarterly at a rate of between 0.25%25 and 0.50% per annum50 basis points on the unused portion of the total revolving credit commitment, based on the Company’s leverage ratio.

On September 26, 2014, the Company modified and extended its existing credit facility (the “Original Facility”) by entering into the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”). On the closing date, there were $180.5 million of term loans outstanding and $6 million of revolving loans outstanding under the Original Facility. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Original Facility was replaced with a $350 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. The outstanding balances in the Original Facility were rolled into the Agreement on the date of entry. In addition, the maturity date of the loans under the Agreement is now September 26, 2019. At AprilJuly 4, 2015 there was $200.0$215.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility and there remains approximately $148.9$133.9 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $350 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At AprilJuly 4, 2015, outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.

Covenants in the Agreement have been modified to where the maximum permitted leverage ratio of funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Agreement) is 3.5 to 1, increasing to 4.0 to 1 for up to two2 fiscal quarters following the closing of an acquisition permitted under the Agreement. The Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR plus between 137.5 basis points and 225 basis points based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the Lenderslenders in an amount equal to between 17.5 basis points and 35 basis points on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the Original Facility has been replaced with a minimum interest coverage ratio (Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense) of 3.0 to 1 for the term of the Agreement. The Company’s interest coverage ratio was 22.830.9 to 1 at AprilJuly 4, 2015. The Company’s leverage ratio was 1.51.7 to 1 at AprilJuly 4, 2015.

In the event of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy of the Company or any subsidiary, all unpaid principal and other amounts owing under the Agreement automatically become due and payable. Other events of default, such as failure to make payments as they become due and breach of financial and other covenants, change of control, judgments over a certain amount, and cross default under other agreements give the Agent the option to declare all such amounts immediately due and payable.


10


7) Product Warranties

In the ordinary course of business, the Company warrants its products against defects in design, materials and workmanship typically over periods ranging from twelve12 to sixty60 months. The Company determines warranty reserves needed by product line based on experience and current facts and circumstances. Activity in the warranty accrual is summarized as follows:

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Balance at beginning of period

  $4,884    $2,796  

Acquisitions

   500     790  

Warranties issued

   738     329  

Warranties settled

   (726   (334

Reassessed warranty exposure

   76     156  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

$5,472  $3,737  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Balance at Beginning of Period$4,884
 $2,796
 $5,472
 $3,737
Acquisitions500
 790
 
 
Warranties Issued1,139
 876
 401
 547
Warranties Settled(1,427) (803) (701) (469)
Reassessed Warranty Exposure223
 266
 147
 110
Balance at End of Period$5,319
 $3,925
 $5,319
 $3,925
8) Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if deemed necessary, by a valuation allowance for the amount of tax benefits which are not expected to be realized.

ASC Topic 740-10Overall - Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC Topic 740-10”) clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions. ASC Topic 740-10 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes. The Company is subject to the provisions of ASC Topic 740-10 and has analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. Should the Company need to accrue a liability for uncertain tax benefits, any interest associated with that liability will be recorded as interest expense. Penalties, if any, would be recognized as operating expenses. There were no penalties or interest liability accrued as of AprilJuly 4, 2015 or December 31, 2014, nor were any penalties or interest costs included in expense for the three month periods ending Aprilor six months ended July 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014. The years under which we conducted our evaluation coincided with the tax years currently still subject to examination by major federal and state tax jurisdictions, those being 2012 through 2014 for federal purposes and 2011 through 2014 for state purposes.

The effective tax rates were approximately 34.5% and 33.9% for the six months and 34.6% and 34.0% for the three months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014, were approximately 34.4% and 33.6%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the second quarter and first quarterssix months of 2015 and 2014 were lower than the federal statutory rate, due to the domestic production activity deduction and lower effective tax rates on foreign income.


11


9) Shareholders’ Equity

The changes in shareholders’ equity for the threesix months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 are summarized as follows:

       Number of Shares 
(Dollars and Shares in thousands)  Amount   Common
Stock
   Convertible
Class B Stock
 

Shares Authorized

     40,000     10,000  

Share Par Value

    $0.01    $0.01  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

COMMON STOCK

Beginning of Period

$219   16,608   5,322  

Conversion of Class B Shares to Common Shares

 —     411   (411

Exercise of Stock Options

 2   68   81  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of Period

$221   17,087   4,992  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL

Beginning of Period

$49,659  

Stock Compensation Expense

 506  

Exercise of Stock Options

 1,108  
  

 

 

     

End of Period

$51,273  
  

 

 

     

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

Beginning of Period

$(11,949

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment

 (3,646

Retirement Liability Adjustment – Net of Tax

 161  
  

 

 

     

End of Period

$(15,434
  

 

 

     

RETAINED EARNINGS

Beginning of Period

$190,248  

Net Income

 10,683  
  

 

 

     

End of Period

$200,931  
  

 

 

     

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

 

 

     

Beginning of Period

$228,177  
  

 

 

     

    

  

 

 

     

End of Period

$236,991  
  

 

 

     

   Number of Shares
(Dollars and Shares in thousands)Amount 
Common
Stock
 
Convertible
Class B Stock
Shares Authorized  40,000
 10,000
Share Par Value  $0.01
 $0.01
COMMON STOCK     
Beginning of Period$219
 16,608
 5,322
Conversion of Class B Shares to Common Shares
 569
 (569)
Exercise of Stock Options3
 94
 102
End of Period$222
 17,271
 4,855
ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL     
Beginning of Period$49,659
    
Stock Compensation Expense1,143
    
Exercise of Stock Options1,343
    
End of Period$52,145
    
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS     
Beginning of Period$(11,949)    
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment(3,214)    
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Net of Tax323
    
End of Period$(14,840)    
RETAINED EARNINGS     
Beginning of Period$190,248
    
Net Income28,373
    
End of Period$218,621
    
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY     
Beginning of Period$228,177
    
      
End of Period$256,148
    
10) Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding are as follows:

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Weighted average shares - Basic

   22,011     21,544  

Net effect of dilutive stock options

   795     1,108  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares - Diluted

 22,806   22,652  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Weighted Average Shares - Basic22,055
 21,616
 22,100
 21,684
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options765
 1,032
 736
 954
Weighted Average Shares - Diluted22,820
 22,648
 22,836
 22,638
The above information has been adjusted to reflect the impact of the one-for-five distribution of Class B Stock for shareholders of record on September 5, 2014.

Stock options with exercise prices greater than the average market price of the underlying common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they are out-of-the-money and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The number ofThere were no common shares covered by out-of-the-money stock options were insignificant at AprilJuly 4, 2015.


12


11) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:

(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments

  $(7,000  $(3,354
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retirement Liability Adjustment – Before Tax

 (12,975 (13,223

Tax Benefit

 4,541   4,628  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retirement Liability Adjustment – After Tax

 (8,434 (8,595
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

    

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

$(15,434$(11,949
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 December 31,
2014
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments$(6,568) $(3,354)
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Before Tax(12,726) (13,223)
Tax Benefit4,454
 4,628
Retirement Liability Adjustment – After Tax(8,272) (8,595)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss$(14,840) $(11,949)
The components of other comprehensive loss are as follows:

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments

  $(3,646  $(386
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in Accumulated Income on Derivatives:

Reclassification to Interest Expense

 —     15  

Mark to Market Adjustments for Derivatives

 —     14  

Tax Expense

 —     (9
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in Accumulated Income on Derivatives

 —     20  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retirement Liability Adjustments:

Reclassifications to General and Administrative Expense:

Amortization of prior service cost

 130   136  

Amortization of net actuarial losses

 118   27  

Tax Benefit

 (87 (61
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retirement Liability Adjustment

 161   102  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

    

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Loss

$(3,485$(264
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments$(3,214) $(568) $432
 $(182)
Change in Accumulated Income on Derivatives:       
Reclassification to Interest Expense
 34
 
 17
Mark to Market Adjustments for Derivatives
 (45) 
 (59)
Tax Expense
 3
 
 14
Change in Accumulated Income on Derivatives
 (8) 
 (28)
Retirement Liability Adjustments:       
Reclassifications to General and Administrative Expense:       
Amortization of Prior Service Cost260
 265
 130
 129
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses237
 54
 119
 27
Tax Benefit(174) (111) (87) (50)
Retirement Liability Adjustment323
 208
 162
 106
        
Other Comprehensive Loss$(2,891) $(368) $594
 $(104)
12) Supplemental Retirement Plan and Related Post Retirement Benefits

The Company has two non-qualified supplemental retirement defined benefit plans (“SERP” and “SERP II”) for certain executive officers. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic pension cost for the plans.

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Service cost

  $48    $62  

Interest cost

   211     188  

Amortization of prior service cost

   124     130  

Amortization of net actuarial losses

   112     27  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic cost

$495  $407  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Service Cost$97
 $124
 $48
 $62
Interest Cost422
 376
 211
 188
Amortization of Prior Service Cost247
 260
 124
 130
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses225
 54
 112
 27
Net Periodic Cost$991
 $814
 $495
 $407

13

Table of Contents

Participants in the SERP are entitled to paid medical, dental and long-term care insurance benefits upon retirement under the plan. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic cost recognized for those benefits:

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   March 29,
2014
 

Service cost

  $2    $1  

Interest cost

   10     8  

Amortization of prior service cost

   6     6  

Amortization of net actuarial losses

   6     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic cost

$24  $15  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Service Cost$3
 $1
 $2
 $1
Interest Cost19
 16
 10
 8
Amortization of Prior Service Cost13
 12
 6
 6
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses12
 
 7
 
Net Periodic Cost$47
 $29
 $25
 $15
13) Sales to Major Customers

The Company has a significant concentration of business with twothree major customers, each in excess of 10% of consolidated sales. The loss of eitherany of these customers would significantly, negatively impact our sales and earnings.

Sales to these twothree customers represented 24%22%, 14% and 15%11% of consolidated sales for the six months ended July 4, 2015 and 20%, 13% and 18% for the three months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015. Sales to these customers were in the Aerospace segment.and Test Systems segments. Accounts receivable from these customers at AprilJuly 4, 2015 was approximately $21.2$47.4 million.

The Company had sales to twothree customers in the Aerospace segmentand Test Systems segments that represented 20%17%, 15% and 17% of consolidated sales for the six months ended June 28, 2014 and 15%, 14% and 23% of consolidated sales for the three months ended March 29,June 28, 2014.

14) Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the Company fail to prevail in any legal matter or should several legal matters be resolved against the Company in the same reporting period, then the financial results of that particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.


On December 29, 2010, Lufthansa Technik AG (“Lufthansa”) filed a Statement of Claim in the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany. Lufthansa’s claim asserts that our subsidiary, AES sold, marketed and brought into use in Germany a power supply system which infringes upon a German patent held by Lufthansa. The relief sought by Lufthansa includes requiring AES to stop selling and marketing the allegedly infringing power supply system, a recall of allegedly infringing products sold to commercial customers since November 26, 2003 and compensation for damages. The claim does not specify an estimate of damages and a damages claim will be made by Lufthansa only if it receives a favorable ruling on the determination of infringement.


On February 6, 2015, the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany rendered its decision that the patent was infringed. The judgment does not require AES to recall products which are already installed in aircraft or have been sold to other end users. However, ifOn July 15, 2015, Lufthansa providesadvised AES of their intention to enforce the required bank guarantees specified inaccounting provisions of the decision, the Company may be requiredwhich require AES to offer a recall of products which are in the distribution channels in Germany, and provide certain financial information regarding sales of the infringing product to enable Lufthansa to make an estimate of requested damages. AES is currently evaluating the information requirements. Additionally, if Lufthansa provides the additional required bank guarantees specified in the decision, the Company may be required to cease distribution of infringing products in Germany (if any). No such bank guarantees haveguarantee has been issued to date.

date regarding this provision.


The Company appealed and believes it has valid defenses to refute the decision. The appeal process is estimated to extend up to two years. The enforcement of the accounting provision of the decision, as discussed above, has no impact on the appeals process. As a result, we do not currently have sufficient information to provide an estimate of AES’s potential exposure related to this matter. As loss exposure is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to this litigation as of AprilJuly 4, 2015.


14

Table of Contents

On November 26, 2014, Lufthansa filed a complaint in the United States District for the Western District of Washington. Lufthansa’s complaint in this action alleges that AES manufactures, uses, sells and offers for sale a power supply system which infringes upon a U.S. patent held by Lufthansa. The patent at issue in the U.S. action is based on technology similar to that involved in the German action. However, the U.S. court will not be bound by the ultimate determination made by the German court. The Company believes it has valid defenses to refute Lufthansa’s claims and intends to contest this matter vigorously. As this matter is in the early stages of fact discovery, we do not currently have sufficient information to provide an estimate of AES’s potential exposure related to this matter. As loss exposure is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to this litigation as of AprilJuly 4, 2015.

15) Segment Information

Below are the sales and operating profit by segment for the three and six months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014 and a reconciliation of segment operating profit to income before income taxes. Operating profit is net sales less cost of products sold and other operating expenses excluding interest and corporate expenses. Cost of products sold and other operating expenses are directly identifiable to the respective segment.

   Three Months Ended 
(Dollars in thousands)  April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Sales

   

Aerospace

  $142,352   $122,372  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Test Systems

 19,341   18,689  

Less Intersegment Sales

 (55 (110
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 19,286   18,579  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Consolidated Sales

$161,638  $140,951  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating Profit (Loss) and Margins

Aerospace

$23,402  $17,490  
 16.4 14.3

Test Systems

 (2,225 (1,695
 (11.5)%  (9.1)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Operating Profit

 21,177   15,795  
 13.1 11.2

Deductions from Operating Profit

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income

 1,246   2,323  

Corporate Expenses and Other

 3,634   2,168  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income Before Income Taxes

$16,297  $11,304  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Sales       
Aerospace$274,522
 $243,895
 $132,170
 $121,523
Test Systems60,327
 71,856
 40,986
 53,167
Less Intersegment Sales(55) (237) 
 (127)
 60,272
 71,619
 40,986
 53,040
Total Consolidated Sales$334,794
 $315,514
 $173,156
 $174,563
Operating Profit and Margins       
Aerospace$43,673
 $38,251
 $20,271
 $20,761
 15.9% 15.7% 15.3% 17.1%
Test Systems7,638
 2,335
 9,863
 4,030
 12.7% 3.2% 24.1% 7.6%
Total Operating Profit51,311
 40,586
 30,134
 24,791
 15.3% 12.9% 17.4% 14.2%
Deductions from Operating Profit       
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income2,357
 4,882
 1,111
 2,559
Corporate Expenses and Other5,613
 4,478
 1,979
 2,310
Income Before Income Taxes$43,341
 $31,226
 $27,044
 $19,922
Identifiable Assets

(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

Aerospace

  $512,777    $468,481  

Test Systems

   64,413     69,247  

Corporate

   23,093     25,182  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

$600,283  $562,910  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(In thousands)July 4,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Aerospace$518,424
 $468,481
Test Systems91,817
 69,247
Corporate27,969
 25,182
Total Assets$638,210
 $562,910



15


16) Fair Value

ASC Topic 820,Fair value Measurements and Disclosures, (“ASC Topic 820”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The statement indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value based upon an exit price model. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and involves consideration of factors specific to the asset or liability.

ASC Topic 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

On a Recurring Basis:

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table provides the financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of AprilJuly 4, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

(In thousands)  

Classification

  Total  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 

Acquisition contingent consideration

         

April 4, 2015

  

Current Liabilities

  $(1,578  —       —      $(1,578

December 31, 2014

  

Current Liabilities

   —      —       —       —    

April 4, 2015

  

Other Liabilities

  $(173  —       —      $(173

December 31, 2014

  

Other Liabilities

  $(1,651  —       —      $(1,651

(In thousands)Classification Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Acquisition contingent consideration         
July 4, 2015Current Liabilities $(308) 
 
 $(308)
December 31, 2014Current Liabilities 
 
 
 
July 4, 2015Other Liabilities $(175) 
 
 $(175)
December 31, 2014Other Liabilities $(1,651) 
 
 $(1,651)
Our Level 3 fair value liabilities represent contingent consideration recorded related to the 2011 Ballard acquisition, to be paid up to a maximum of $5.5 million if annual revenue growth targets are met in the years 2012 - 2016 and the 2013 AeroSat acquisition, to be paid up to a maximum of $53.0 million if annual revenue targets are met in the years 2014 and 2015. The change in the balance of contingent consideration during the three month periodand six months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 is primarily due to accretion, which is classifiedfair value adjustments of $1.3 million, resulting from the re-evaluation of the probability of the achievement of the contingent consideration targets. This adjustment was recorded within interest expenseSG&A expenses in the consolidated condensed statement of operations.
Contingent consideration payments related to 2014 were insignificant.

The amounts recorded were calculated using an estimate of the probability of future revenue. The varying contingent payments were then discounted to the present value utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology. The contingent consideration liabilities have no observable Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.

On a Non-recurring Basis:

In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, the Company estimates the fair value of reporting units, utilizing unobservable Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs require significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices or observable inputs for assets of a similar nature. The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of reporting units utilizing unobservable inputs. The fair value measurement of the reporting unit under the step-one and step-two analysis of the quantitative goodwill impairment test are classified as Level 3 inputs.

Intangible assets that are amortized are evaluated for recoverability whenever adverse effects or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The recoverability test consists of comparing the undiscounted

16

Table of Contents

projected cash flows with the carrying amount. Should the carrying amount exceed undiscounted projected cash flows, an impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds fair value. For the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible asset, the impairment test consists of comparing the fair value, determined using the relief from royalty method, with its carrying amount. An impairment loss would be recognized for the carrying amount in excess of its fair value.

At AprilJuly 4, 2015, the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets classified using Level 3 inputs are comprised of the Armstrong goodwill and intangible assets acquired on January 14, 2015, which are currently valued based on management’s best estimates. When the accounting for the acquisition is finalized, these intangible assets will be valued using discounted cash flow methodology.

Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable approximate fair value. The carrying value of the Company’s variable rate long-term debt instruments also approximates fair value due to the variable rate feature of these instruments. As of AprilJuly 4, 2015, the Company concluded that no indicators of impairment relating to intangible assets or goodwill existed and an interim test was not performed.


17) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance regarding revenue recognition. The comprehensive new standard will supersede existing revenue recognition guidance and require revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Adoption of the new rules could affect the timing of revenue recognition for certain transactions. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. ThisOn July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date and permitted early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. Therefore, this authoritative guidance will be effective as of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2017. However, the FASB has proposed a deferral of the effective date of the new revenue standard by one year.2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding the presentation of debt issuance costs. The authoritative guidance requires that all costs incurred to issue debt be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the debt. This authoritative guidance, which will be applied on a retrospective basis, will be effective as of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to early adopt by the end of fiscal 2015 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The authoritative guidance provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the guidance requires the software license element of the arrangement to be accounted for consistent with other software license agreements. This authoritative guidance will be effective as of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

18) Acquisitions

Armstrong

Aerospace, Inc.

On January 14, 2015, the Company purchased 100% of the equity of Armstrong for approximately $52.6 million in cash. Armstrong, located in Itasca, Illinois, is a leading provider of engineering, design and certification solutions for commercial aircraft, specializing in connectivity, in-flight entertainment, and electrical power systems. Armstrong will beis included in our Aerospace segment. This transaction was not considered material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Astronics Test Systems

On February 28, 2014, our wholly owned subsidiary, ATS, purchased substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the Test and Services Division of EADS North America, Inc. for approximately $69.4 million in cash, including a net working capital adjustment of approximately $16.4 million. Located in Irvine, California, ATS is a leading provider of highly-engineered automated test systems, subsystems and instruments for the semiconductor, commercial electronics, commercial aerospace and defense industries. ATS provides fully customized testing systems and support services for these markets. It also designs and manufactures test equipment under the test instrument brands known as Racal and Talon. The acquisition strengthens our service offerings and expertise in the test market. This subsidiary is included in our Test Systems segment. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has been finalized. Purchased intangible assets are deductible for tax purposes.


17

Table of Contents

Item 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(The following should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.)

OVERVIEW

Astronics Corporation (“Astronics” or the “Company”) is a leading supplier of products to the global aerospace, defense, consumer electronics and semiconductor industries. Our products and services include advanced, high-performance electrical power generation & distribution systems, lighting & safety systems, avionics products, aircraft structures, engineering design & systems certification and automated test systems.

Our Aerospace segment designs and manufactures products for the global aerospace industry. Product lines include lighting & safety systems, electrical power generation, distribution and motions systems, aircraft structures, engineering design & systems certification and avionics products. Our Aerospace customers are the airframe manufacturers (OEM’s) that build aircraft for the commercial, military and general aviation markets, suppliers to those OEM’s, aircraft operators such as airlines and branches of the U.S. Department of Defense as well as the Federal Aviation Administration and airport operators. Our Test Systems segment designs, develops, manufactures and maintains automated test systems that support the semiconductor, commercial electronics, aerospace, communications and weapons test systems as well as training and simulation devices for both commercial and military applications. In the Test Systems Segment, Astronics’ products are sold to a global customer base including OEMsOEM's and prime government contractors for both commercial electronics and military products.

Our strategy is to increase our value by developing technologies and capabilities either internally or through acquisition, and using those capabilities to provide innovative solutions to the aerospace and defense, commercial electronics, semiconductor and other markets where our technology can be beneficial.

Important factors affecting our growth and profitability are the rate at which new aircraft are produced, government funding of military programs, our ability to have our products designed into new aircraft and the rates at which aircraft owners, including commercial airlines, refurbish or install upgrades to their aircraft. New aircraft build rates and aircraft owners spending on upgrades and refurbishments is cyclical and dependent on the strength of the global economy. Once designed into a new aircraft, the spare parts business is frequently retained by the Company. With the acquisition of ATS in 2014, future growth and profitability of the test business is dependent on developing and procuring new and follow-on business in commercial electronics and semiconductor markets as well as with the military. The nature of our Test Systems business is such that it pursues large multi-year projects. There can be significant periods of time between orders in this business which may result in large fluctuations of sales and profit levels and backlog from period to period.

ACQUISITIONS

On January 14, 2015, the Company purchased 100% of the equity of Armstrong Aerospace, Inc. (“Armstrong”) for approximately $52.6 million in cash. Specializing in connectivity, in-flight entertainment, and electrical power systems, Armstrong is a leading provider of engineering design and certification solutions for commercial aircraft, and is located in Itasca, Illinois. Armstrong is included in our Aerospace segment.

On February 28, 2014, Astronics completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of EADS North America’s Test and Services division. ATS is located in Irvine, California and is a leading provider of highly engineered automated test systems, subsystems and instruments for the semiconductor, commercial electronics, commercial aerospace and defense industries. The purchase price was approximately $69.4 million in cash. The addition of ATS complements products and technologies that the Test Systems segment offers.


18


CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OUTLOOK

   Three Months Ended 
(Dollars in thousands)  April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Sales

  $161,638   $140,951  

Gross Profit (sales less cost of products sold)

  $40,162   $30,005  

Gross Margin

   24.8  21.3

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

  $22,619   $16,378  

SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales

   14.0  11.6

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income

  $1,246   $2,323  

Effective Tax Rate

   34.4  33.6

Net Income

  $10,683   $7,507  

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
 July 4,
2015
 June 28,
2014
Sales$334,794
 $315,514
 $173,156
 $174,563
Gross Profit (sales less cost of products sold)$89,614
 $73,207
 $49,452
 $43,202
Gross Margin26.8% 23.2% 28.6% 24.7%
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses$43,916
 $37,099
 $21,297
 $20,721
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales13.1% 11.8% 12.3% 11.9%
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income$2,357
 $4,882
 $1,111
 $2,559
Effective Tax Rate34.5% 33.9% 34.6% 34.0%
Net Income$28,373
 $20,651
 $17,690
 $13,144
A discussion by segment can be found at “Segment Results of Operations and Outlook” in this MD&A.

CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY RESULTS
Consolidated sales for the firstsecond quarter of 2015 increased 14.7%were $173.2 million, down slightly from $174.6 million for the same period last year as strength in Aerospace sales helped to $161.6offset lower Test Systems segment sales. The 2015 second quarter included $7.1 million compared with $141.0in sales from Armstrong Aerospace, Inc. (“Armstrong”), acquired on January 14, 2015. Organic sales for the quarter decreased $8.5 million, or 4.9%, on lower Test System segment sales.
Consolidated cost of products sold decreased $7.7 million to $123.7 million in the second quarter of 2015 from $131.4 million for the same period last year.  Aerospace segment sales increased $19.9 million to $142.4 million and Test Systems segment sales increased $0.7 million to $19.3 million. First quarter 2014 sales reflect four weeks of activity for ATS, which was acquired on February 28, 2014. The 2015 first quarter included incremental sales of $6.6 million from Armstrong acquired on January 14, 2015 (see Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Note 18), while organic sales increased $14.0 million, or 9.9% to $155.0 million.

Consolidated costCost of products sold increased $10.6in the second quarter of 2014 was negatively impacted by $8.7 million related to $121.5inventory step-up expense of acquired businesses, as compared to $0.1 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2015 from $110.9 million for the same period last year.2015.  The increase was primarily due to the incremental cost of products sold associated with Armstrong of $4.9$5.5 million increasedwere largely offset by lower cost of products sold associated with increased organicresulting from the decreased sales volumes and increased engineering and development (“E&D”) costs. E&D costs were $22.2 millionvolume in the first quarter of 2015, compared to $17.2 million in last year’s first quarter . The increase in E&D costs were largely attributable to the incremental E&D costs of ATS ($1.9 million) and Armstrong ($1.3 million). Cost of products sold in the first quarter of 2014 included approximately $8.7 million related to inventory step-up expense, as compared to $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2015.Test Systems segment.  Consolidated cost of products sold as a percentage of sales was 75.2%71.4% in the firstsecond quarter of 2015 compared with 78.7%75.3% in the firstsecond quarter of 2014.

E&D costs were $21.3 million in the second quarter of 2015 (12.3% of sales), compared to $20.6 million in last year’s second quarter (11.9% of sales).  The increase in E&D costs was attributable to the incremental E&D costs of Armstrong ($1.6 million). 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $22.6$21.3 million, or 14.0%12.3% of sales, in the firstsecond quarter of 2015 compared with $16.4$20.7 million, or 11.6%11.9% of sales, in the same period last year. The increase was due primarily to the incremental SG&A costs of ATSArmstrong, which added $1.6 million to SG&A in the second quarter of 2015, including $0.7 million of amortization expense for acquired intangible assets of that business.
Diluted earnings per share for the 2015 second quarter were $0.77 compared with $0.58 in the prior year period.
CONSOLIDATED YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS
Consolidated sales for the first six months of 2015 increased by $19.3 million, or 6.1%, to $334.8 million from $315.5 million for the same period last year. The acquisition of Armstrong contributed $13.8 million to consolidated sales, while consolidated organic sales increased $5.5 million, or 1.7%.

Consolidated cost of products sold increased $2.9 million to $245.2 million in the first six months of 2015 from $242.3 million for the same period last year.  The increase was due primarily to the incremental cost of products sold associated with Armstrong of $10.4 million, cost of products sold resulting from increased organic sales volume and increased E&D costs.  Cost of products sold in the first six months of 2014 included $17.4 million related to inventory step-up expense, as compared to $0.7 million in the first six months of 2015.  Consolidated cost of products sold as a percentage of sales was 73.2% in the first six months of 2015 compared with 76.8% in the first six months of 2014. E&D costs were $43.6 million in the first six months of 2015 (13.0% of sales), compared to $37.9 million in last year’s second quarter (12.0% of sales).  The increase in E&D costs were largely attributable to the incremental E&D costs of Armstrong ($3.0 million). 
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $43.9 million, or 13.1% of sales, in the first six months of 2015 compared with $37.1 million, or 11.8% of sales, in the same period last year. The increase was due primarily to the incremental

19

Table of Contents

SG&A costs of Astronics Test Systems, Inc. (“ATS”, acquired on February 28, 2014) and Armstrong, which collectively added $3.1$4.4 million to SG&A in the first quartersix months of 2015, including $0.8$1.7 million of amortization expense for acquired intangible assets of those businesses. Additionally, higher SG&A expense reflects increased headcount and compensation costs to support growth.

Diluted earnings per share for the first six months of 2015 were $1.24 compared with $0.91 for the same period last year period.
The effective tax rates were 34.4%approximately 34.5% and 33.6%33.9% for the six months and 34.6% and 34.0% for the three months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015 and March 29,June 28, 2014, respectively. The effective tax rate for the second quarter and first quarterssix months of 2015 and 2014 were lower than the federal statutory rate, due to the domestic production activity deduction and lower effective tax rates on foreign income.


For both the three and six months ended AprilJuly 4, 2015, the earnings per share increase, as compared to the respective periodperiods in the prior year,is due primarily to the increasein net income. Earnings per share for all prior periods presented have been calculated reflecting the effect of the one-for-five Class B share distribution for shareholders of record on September 5, 2014.

We expect consolidated sales in 2015 to be between $680 million and $740$715 million. Approximately $550$545 million to $580$570 million of forecasted 2015 revenue is expected from the Aerospace segment, while approximately $130$135 million to $160$145 million of the forecasted revenue is expected from the Test Systems segment.

Our consolidated backlog at AprilJuly 4, 2015 was $378.5$352.0 million, of which approximately $314.1$263.0 million is expected to ship in 2015.

We expect our capital equipment spending in 2015 to be in the range of $20 million to $27 million. E&D costs are estimated to be in the range of $75 million to $80 million.

SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND OUTLOOK

Operating profit, as presented below, is sales less cost of products sold and other operating expenses, excluding interest expense and other corporate expenses. Cost of products sold and other operating expenses are directly identifiable to the respective segment. Operating profit is reconciled to earnings before income taxes in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements included in this report.


20


AEROSPACE SEGMENT

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Sales

  $        142,352   $        122,372  

Operating profit

  $23,402   $17,490  

Operating Margin

   16.4  14.3
   April 4,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 

Total Assets

  $        512,777    $        468,481   

Backlog

  $233,955   $223,769  

Aerospace Sales by Market

  Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,2015  March 29,
2014
 

Commercial Transport

  $        120,194    $99,287   

Military

   9,258    8,958  

Business Jet

   8,092    9,866  

Other

   4,808    4,261  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
$142,352  $        122,372  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Aerospace Sales by Product Line

  Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
  March 29,2014 

Electrical Power & Motion

  $69,570    $65,833   

Lighting & Safety

   42,077    35,091  

Avionics

   17,367    12,752  

Systems Certification

   4,574    —    

Structures

   3,956    3,638  

Other

   4,808    5,058  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
$        142,352  $        122,372  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4, 2015 June 28, 2014 July 4, 2015 June 28, 2014
Sales$274,522
 $243,895
 $132,170
 $121,523
Operating Profit$43,673
 $38,251
 $20,271
 $20,761
Operating Margin15.9% 15.7% 15.3% 17.1%
        
Aerospace Sales by Market       
(In thousands)       
Commercial Transport$227,823
 $195,790
 $107,629
 $96,504
Military19,827
 21,310
 10,569
 12,352
Business Jet17,153
 18,175
 9,061
 8,308
Other9,719
 8,620
 4,911
 4,359
 $274,522

$243,895
 $132,170
 $121,523
Aerospace Sales by Product Line       
(In thousands)       
Electrical Power & Motion$137,415
 $126,482
 $67,844
 $60,651
Lighting & Safety79,985
 74,598
 37,907
 39,507
Avionics29,030
 25,250
 11,663
 12,497
Systems Certification10,344
 
 5,771
 
Structures8,029
 7,343
 4,074
 3,704
Other9,719
 10,222
 4,911
 5,164
 $274,522
 $243,895
 $132,170
 $121,523
(In thousands)July 4, 2015 December 31, 2014
Total Assets$518,424
 $468,481
Backlog$236,264
 $223,769
AEROSPACE QUARTERLY RESULTS
Aerospace segment sales increased by $19.9$10.6 million, or 16.3%8.8%, when compared with the prior year’s firstsecond quarter to $142.4$132.2 million. Organic sales grew 10.9%2.9%, or $13.3$3.5 million, and sales from Armstrong added $6.6$7.1 million.

Sales to the Commercial Transport market increased $20.9$11.1 million, of which $6.6$7.1 million was related to the acquisition of Armstrong, primarily comprised of Systems Certification sales. The remaining increase was primarily related to higher organic sales of Lighting & Safety, Avionics and Electrical Power & Motion products which increased $8.0 million or 13.9%, partially offset by lower sales of Avionics products. Organic Lighting and Safety product sales to the Commercial Transport market increased by $5.4 million. Organic salesSales of Avionics products to the Commercial Transport market decreased by $2.6 million. Sales to the Military market decreased $1.8 million when compared with last year’s second quarter as Electrical Power & Motion and Other product sales decreased. Sales to the Business Jet market increased $0.8 million compared with the same period last year as increased Avionics sales were partially offset by lower Lighting & Safety product sales.
Aerospace operating profit for the second quarter of 2015 was $20.3 million, or 15.3% of sales, compared with $20.8 million, or 17.1% of sales, in the same period last year. Operating margins were negatively affected by increased E&D spending, lower operating margin from the Armstrong business and a general increase of operating costs. Organic Aerospace E&D costs increased $0.4 million compared to last year’s second quarter. Aerospace SG&A expense increased $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2015 as compared with 2014. Incremental SG&A from Armstrong was $1.6 million, including $0.7 million of purchased intangible asset amortization expense for acquired intangible assets.
AEROSPACE YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS
Aerospace segment sales increased by $5.0$30.6 million, or 12.6%, when compared with the prior year’s first six months, to $274.5 million. Organic sales grew 6.9%, or $16.8 million, and sales from Armstrong added $13.8 million.

21

Table of Contents

Sales to the Commercial Transport market increased $32.0 million, of which $13.8 million was related to the acquisition of Armstrong, primarily comprised of Systems Certification sales. The remaining increase was primarily higher sales of Electrical Power & Motion, Lighting & Safety and Avionics products. Sales of Electrical Power & Motion products to the Commercial Transport market increased approximately $3.5$12.6 million, or 10.5%. Sales of Lighting & Safety products to the Commercial Transport market increased by $5.0 million.

Sales of Avionics products to the Commercial Transport market increased by $3.3 million. Sales to the Military market decreased $1.5 million when compared with last year’s first six months, due to lower sales of Electrical Power & Motion and Other products, partially offset by higher sales of Lighting & Safety products to this market. Sales to the Business Jet market decreased $1.8$1.0 million when compared with last year’s first quarter,during this period due to lower organic sales of avionics and lightingLighting & Safety products to this market.

Aerospace operating profit for the first quartersix months of 2015 was $23.4$43.7 million, or 16.4%15.9% of sales, compared with $17.5$38.3 million, or 14.3%15.7% of sales, in the same period last year. Approximately $0.6 million in operating profit was related to Armstrong, which was acquired in January 2015. Armstrong inventory step-up expense was $0.6 in the first quarter of 2015. Operating profit in the first quarter of 2014 included expense of $2.4 million associated with inventory step-up, primarily related to AeroSat and PGA, which were acquired in the fourth quarter of 2013. Operating leverage gained on increased volume for the organic business was partially offset by approximately $1.9 million of higher organic E&D costs.costs of approximately $2.3 million. Aerospace SG&A expense increased $2.6$4.3 million in the first quartersix months of 2015 as compared with 2014. The increaseIncremental SG&A from Armstrong was due primarily to the incremental SG&A of Armstrong which added $1.2$2.7 million, including $0.4$1.1 million of purchased intangible asset amortization expense for acquired intangible assets.

Outlook The first six months of 2014 included inventory step-up costs of $2.4 million that reduced normal operating margins for Aerospace – that period.

AEROSPACE OUTLOOK
We expect 2015 sales for our Aerospace segment to be in the range of $550$545 million to $580$570 million. The Aerospace segment’s backlog at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2015 was $234.0$236.3 million with approximately $209.5$187.6 million expected to be shipped over the remaining part of 2015 and $219.8$214.6 million is expected to ship over the next 12 months.

TEST SYSTEMS SEGMENT

   Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Sales

  $19,341   $18,689  

Less Intersegment Sales

   (55  (110
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Sales

$19,286  $18,579  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating profit (loss)

$(2,225$(1,695

Operating Margin

 (11.5)%  (9.1)% 
   April 4,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 

Total Assets

  $64,413   $69,247  

Backlog

  $144,514   $146,964  

Test Systems Sales by Market

  Three Months Ended 
(In thousands)  April 4,
2015
  March 29,
2014
 

Commercial Electronics

  $4,752   $14,337  

Military

   14,534    4,242  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
$19,286  $18,579  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Six Months Ended Three Months Ended
(In thousands)July 4, 2015 June 28, 2014 July 4, 2015 June 28, 2014
Sales$60,327
 $71,856
 $40,986
 $53,167
Less Intersegment Sales(55) (237) 
 (127)
Net Sales$60,272
 $71,619
 $40,986
 $53,040
Operating profit (loss)$7,638
 $2,335
 $9,863
 $4,030
Operating Margin12.7% 3.2% 24.1% 7.6%
        
Test Systems Sales by Market       
(In thousands)       
Commercial Electronics$36,258
 $57,457
 $31,507
 $43,120
Military24,014
 14,162
 9,479
 9,920
 $60,272
 $71,619
 $40,986
 $53,040
(In thousands)July 4, 2015 December 31, 2014
Total Assets$91,817
 $69,247
Backlog$115,770
 $146,964

TEST SYSTEMS QUARTERLY RESULTS
Sales in the second quarter of 2015 first quarter increased $0.7decreased $12.0 million to $19.3$41.0 million compared to the same period in 2014, a decrease of 22.7%.
Operating profit was $9.9 million or 24.1% of sales, compared with $4.0 million or 7.6% of sales in last year’s second quarter. The 2014 second quarter reflects non-recurring purchase accounting-related inventory step-up costs of $8.7 million that reduced normal operating margins for that period. This effect was partially mitigated by a decrease in E&D costs of $1.3 million, to $2.8 million in the second quarter of 2015 from $4.1 million in the prior year period.

22

Table of Contents

TEST SYSTEMS YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS
Sales in the first six months of 2015 decreased 15.8% to $60.3 million compared with sales of $18.6$71.6 million for the same period in 2014. During 2014 ATS completed delivery of units with its primary customer indue to lower shipments to the Commercial Electronics market. Sales to the Commercial Electronics market and will begin delivery on a follow on orderdecreased $21.2 million compared with the same period in the second or third quarter of this year. The decrease in the Commercial Electronics market2014, which was partially offset by increased sales of $9.9 million to the Military market, primarily resulting from incrementalmarket.
Operating profit was $7.6 million, or 12.7% of sales, attributable to the acquisition of ATS. Operating loss for the first quarter of 2015 was $2.2 million compared with an operating loss$2.3 million, or 3.2% of $1.7 million in the same period last year, primarily as a result of $0.3 million of incremental amortization expense related to the ATS intangible assetssales, in the first quartersix months of 2015 as compared to the2014. The first quartersix months of 2014.

Outlook for Test Systems – 2014 reflects inventory step-up costs of $15.0 million that reduced normal operating margins in that period.

TEST SYSTEMS OUTLOOK
We expect sales for the Test Systems segment for 2015 to be in the range of $130$135 million to $160$145 million. The Test Systems segment’s backlog at the end of the firstsecond quarter of 2015 was $144.5$115.7 million with approximately $104.6$75.4 million expected to be shipped over the remaining part of 2015 and approximately $112.6$96.7 million scheduled to ship over the next 12 months. By the end of 2014, we delivered the final unit under our initial contract with our major customer. We received a follow-on order from this customer, and expect to begin delivery of the associated units in the second or third quarter of 2015.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Operating Activities:

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $26.8$20.9 million for the first threesix months of 2015, as compared with $2.6$23.2 million during the same period in 2014. Cash flow from operating activities increaseddecreased primarily due to higher net income as adjusted for non-cash expenses and by the impact of decreasesincreases in net operating assets for the first threesix months of 2015 when compared with the first threesix months of 2014.

Investing Activities:

Cash used for investing activities was $60.0$67.6 million for the first threesix months of 2015 compared with $87.2$90.9 million used in the same period of 2014. Cash used for the acquisition of Armstrong in January 2015 was $52.6 million. Cash used for capital expenditures of $7.1 million related primarily to the modifications of the new buildings in Clackamas, Oregon.was $12.3 million. The Company expects capital spending in 2015 to be in the range of $20 million to $27 million.

Financing Activities:

The primary financing activities in 2015 relate to borrowings on our senior credit facility to fund the acquisition of Armstrong and principal payments against our outstanding balance on the senior facility. In January 2015, we borrowed $40.0 million to fund the acquisition of Armstrong. Through the end of the first quarter of 2015 we made principal payments of $5.7 million, primarily from funds generated by operations.

On February 28, 2014, in connection with the funding of ATS, the Company amended its existing credit facility (the “Original Facility”) to exercise its option to increase the revolving credit commitment. The Credit Agreement provided for a $125 million five-year revolving credit facility maturing on June 30, 2018, of which $58.0 million was drawn to finance the acquisition. In the first quarter of 2014, we made principal payments of $0.4 million.

On September 26, 2014, we modified and extended the Original Facility by entering into the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”). On the closing date, there were $180.5 million of term loans outstanding, $6 million of revolving loans outstanding and letters of credit with a face amount of $8.7 million outstanding under the Original Facility. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Original Facility was replaced with a $350 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. The outstanding balances in the Original Facility were rolled into the Agreement on the date of entry. In addition, the maturity date of the loans under the Agreement is now September 26, 2019.

At July 4, 2015 there was $215.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility and there remains $133.9 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $350 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At July 4, 2015, outstanding letters of credit totaled $1.1 million.
The maximum permitted leverage ratio of funded debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Agreement)is 3.5 to 1, increasing to 4.0 to 1 for up to two fiscal quarters following the closing of an acquisition permitted under the Agreement. The Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month Libor plus between 137.5 basis points and 225 basis points based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the Lenders in an amount equal to between 17.5 basis points and 35 basis points on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the Original Facility was replaced with a minimum interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest expense) of 3.0 to 1 for the term of the Agreement. At April

23

Table of Contents

July 4, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants pursuant to the credit facility. Our interest coverage ratio was 22.830.9 to 1 and the leverage ratio was 1.51.7 to 1 at AprilJuly 4, 2015.

The Company’s cash needs for working capital, debt service and capital equipment during 2015 are expected to be met by cash flows from operations and cash balances and, if necessary, utilization of the revolving credit facility.

In the event of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy of the Company or any subsidiary, all unpaid principal and other amounts owing under the Credit Agreement automatically become due and payable. Other events of default, such as failure to make payments as they become due and breach of financial and other covenants, give the Agent the option to declare all such amounts immediately due and payable.

BACKLOG

The Company’s backlog at AprilJuly 4, 2015 was $378.5$352.0 million compared with $370.7 million at December 31, 2014 and $362.4$326.8 million at March 29,June 28, 2014.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

The following table represents contractual obligations as of AprilJuly 4, 2015:

   Payments Due by Period 
(In thousands)  Total   2015   2016-2017   2018-2019   After 2019 

Long-term Debt

  $216,757    $1,934    $5,286    $204,505    $5,032  

Purchase Obligations

   132,894     127,463     4,994     437     —    

Interest on Long-term Debt

   19,028     4,105     7,955     6,637  ��  331  

Supplemental Retirement Plan and Post Retirement Obligations

   21,880     303     807     804     19,966  

Operating Leases

   9,163     2,214     3,858     2,962     129  

Other Long-term Liabilities

   1,891     21     1,772     26     72  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Contractual Obligations

$401,613  $136,040  $24,672  $215,371  $25,530  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 Payments Due by Period
(In thousands)Total 2015 2016-2017 2018-2019 After 2019
Long-term Debt$231,171
 $1,315
 $5,327
 $219,565
 $4,964
Purchase Obligations108,107
 101,219
 6,828
 60
 
Interest on Long-term Debt19,835
 3,989
 8,448
 7,067
 331
Supplemental Retirement Plan and Post Retirement Obligations21,780
 202
 807
 804
 19,967
Operating Leases9,295
 1,849
 4,104
 3,194
 148
Other Long-term Liabilities620
 19
 503
 26
 72
Total Contractual Obligations$390,808
 $108,593
 $26,017
 $230,716
 $25,482
Notes to Contractual Obligations Table

Purchase Obligations— Purchase obligations are comprised of the Company’s commitments for goods and services in the normal course of business.

Long-Term Debt— See Part 1 Financial Information, Item 1 Financial Statements, Note 6, Long-Term Debt and Notes Payable included in this report.

Operating Leases— Operating lease obligations are primarily related to facility leases for our AES, AeroSat, Ballard, DME, Max-Viz, Peco and Luminescent Systems Canada.

MARKET RISK

The Company believes that there have been no material changes in the current year regarding the market risk information for its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Although the majority of our sales, expenses and cash flows are transacted in U.S. dollars, we have exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to the Euro and the Canadian dollar. The Company believes that the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates in 2015 have not been significant.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for a complete discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies.



24


RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance regarding revenue recognition. The comprehensive new standard will supersede existing revenue recognition guidance and require revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Adoption of the new rules could affect the timing of revenue recognition for certain transactions. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. ThisOn July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date and permitted early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. Therefore, this authoritative guidance will be effective as of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2017. However, the FASB has proposed a deferral of the effective date of the new revenue standard by one year.2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding the presentation of debt issuance costs. The authoritative guidance requires that all costs incurred to issue debt be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the debt. This authoritative guidance, which will be applied on a retrospective basis, will be effective as of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to early adopt by the end of fiscal 2015 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The authoritative guidance provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the guidance requires the software license element of the arrangement to be accounted for consistent with other software license agreements. This authoritative guidance will be effective as of the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information included in this report that does not consist of historical facts, including statements accompanied by or containing words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “expected,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “approximate,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “anticipates,” “presume” and “assume,” are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to several factors, risks and uncertainties, the impact or occurrence of which could cause actual results to differ materially from the expected results described in the forward-looking statements. Certain of these factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed in the sections of this report entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” New factors, risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time that may affect the forward-looking statements made herein. Given these factors, risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as predictive of future results. We disclaim any obligation to update the forward-looking statements made in this report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See Market Risk in Item 2, above.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

a)The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of AprilJuly 4, 2015. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of AprilJuly 4, 2015.


b)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


25


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the Company fail to prevail in any legal matter or should several legal matters be resolved against the Company in the same reporting period, then the financial results of that particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.


On December 29, 2010, Lufthansa Technik AG (“Lufthansa”) filed a Statement of Claim in the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany. Lufthansa’s claim asserts that our subsidiary, Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corp. (“AES”)AES sold, marketed and brought into use in Germany a power supply system which infringes upon a German patent held by Lufthansa. The relief sought by Lufthansa includes requiring AES to stop selling and marketing the allegedly infringing power supply system, a recall of allegedly infringing products sold to commercial customers since November 26, 2003 and compensation for damages. The claim does not specify an estimate of damages and a damages claim will be made by Lufthansa only if it receives a favorable ruling on the determination of infringement.


On February 6, 2015, the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany rendered its decision that the patent was infringed. The judgment does not require AES to recall products which are already installed in aircraft or have been sold to other end users. However, ifOn July 15, 2015, Lufthansa providesadvised AES of their intention to enforce the required bank guarantees specified inaccounting provisions of the decision, the Company may be requiredwhich require AES to offer a recall of products which are in the distribution channels in Germany, and provide certain financial information regarding sales of the infringing product to enable Lufthansa to make an estimate of requested damages. AES is currently evaluating the information requirements. Additionally, if Lufthansa provides the additional required bank guarantees specified in the decision, the Company may be required to cease distribution of infringing products in Germany (if any). No such bank guarantees haveguarantee has been issued to date.

date regarding this provision.


The Company has appealed and believes it has valid defenses to refute the decision. The appeal process is estimated to extend up to two years. The enforcement of the accounting provision of the decision, as discussed above, has no impact on the appeals process. As a result, we do not currently have sufficient information to provide an estimate of AES’s potential exposure related to this matter. As loss exposure is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to this litigation as of AprilJuly 4, 2015.

On November 26, 2014, Lufthansa filed a complaint in the United States District for the Western District of Washington. Lufthansa’s complaint in this action alleges that AES manufactures, uses, sells and offers for sale a power supply system which infringes upon a U.S. patent held by Lufthansa. The patent at issue in the U.S. action is based on technology similar to that involved in the German action. However, the U.S. court will not be bound by the ultimate determination made by the German court. The Company believes it has valid defenses to refute Lufthansa’s claims and intends to contest this matter vigorously. As this matter is in the early stages of fact discovery, we do not currently have sufficient information to provide an estimate of AES’s potential exposure related to this matter. As loss exposure is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to this litigation as of AprilJuly 4, 2015.

Other than this proceeding, we are not party to any significant pending legal proceedings that management believes will result in material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1a Risk Factors

In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds

(c)The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of its common stock for the quarter ended April 4, 2015:

Period  

(a)

Total number
of shares
Purchased

   (b)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
   

(c)

Total number of
shares Purchased
as part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs

   (d)
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
 

January 1, 2015 – January 31, 2015

   1,856    $55.27     —       —    

February 1, 2015 – February 28, 2015

   1,066     56.06     —       —    

March 1, 2015 – April 4, 2015

   2,405     70.79     —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

 5,327  $60.71   —     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

In connection with the exercise

None

26

Table of stock options, we accept, from time to time, delivery of shares to pay the exercise price of stock options.

Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification - Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2Section 302 Certification - Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101.1*Instance Document
Exhibit 101.2*Schema Document
Exhibit 101.3*Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.4*Labels Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.5*Presentation Linkbase Document
Exhibit 101.6*Definition Linkbase Document

*Submitted electronically herewith.


27


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ASTRONICS CORPORATION

(Registrant)
ASTRONICS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Date:August 11, 2015

May 13, 2015

By:

/s/ David C. Burney

David C. Burney

David C. Burney
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

26


28