Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2016, there were outstanding ~~17,732,557~~17,806,244 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock.


	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(in thousands, except share amounts)						(in thousands, except share amounts)
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	51,979		$	60,468		$	59,456		$	60,468
Restricted cash		46			543			298			543
Accounts receivable, net		66,687			62,105			51,184			62,105
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		3,352			6,757			2,047			6,757
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,452			7,142			9,892			7,142

Total current assets		131,516			137,015			122,877			137,015
Property, plant and equipment, net		71,223			72,547			67,633			72,547
Restricted cash								1,500			—
Goodwill		28,749			18,058			23,346			18,058
Intangibles, net		20,532			18,974			19,031			18,974
Deferred tax and other assets		12,206			11,522			14,434			11,522

TOTAL ASSETS	$	264,226		$	258,116		$	248,821		$	258,116


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	7,949		$	6,849		$	6,154		$	6,849
Accrued expenses		17,700			19,946			17,323			19,946
Current maturities of long-term debt		8,383			8,421			8,388			8,421
Income taxes payable		1,910			3,091			306			3,091
Deferred revenue		4,896			4,670			3,582			4,670

Total current liabilities		40,838			42,977			35,753			42,977
Long-term debt		67,075			69,238			64,976			69,238
Deferred revenue		367			359			311			359
Deferred tax liability		188			220			22			220
Other liabilities		32,579			22,009			29,797			22,009

Total liabilities		141,047			134,803			130,859			134,803

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at March 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015		—			—
Common stock - $0.001 par value; 190,000,000 shares authorized; 17,732,557 and 17,757,945 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		18			18
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015								—			—
Common stock - $0.001 par value; 191,000,000 shares authorized; 17,806,244 and 17,757,945 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively								18			18
Additional paid-in capital		143,726			143,012			145,498			143,012
Accumulated deficit		(7,376	)		(6,043	)		(12,127	)		(6,043	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(13,294	)		(13,836	)		(15,427	)		(13,836	)

Total stockholders’ equity		123,074			123,151			117,962			123,151
Non-redeemable, non-controlling interest		105			162			—			162

Total equity		123,179			123,313			117,962			123,313

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	264,226		$	258,116		$	248,821		$	258,116

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)						(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenue	$	62,341		$	77,650		$	54,911		$	75,106		$	117,252		$	152,756

Expenses:
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		36,276			43,933			33,276			39,736			69,552			83,669
Depreciation and amortization		8,243			8,096			9,013			8,211			17,256			16,307
Impairment of intangible assets								397			—			397			—
Selling and marketing		1,892			2,678			1,943			2,262			3,835			4,940
General and administrative		15,341			20,491			13,576			15,794			28,917			36,285

Total expenses		61,752			75,198			58,205			66,003			119,957			141,201

Operating income		589			2,452
Other expense:
Operating income (loss)								(3,294	)		9,103			(2,705	)		11,555
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(668	)		(511	)		(643	)		(508	)		(1,311	)		(1,019	)
Other expense, net		(286	)		(569	)
Other income (expense), net								315			160			29			(409	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(365	)		1,372			(3,622	)		8,755			(3,987	)		10,127
Income tax expense		(902	)		(2,314	)		(1,234	)		(2,635	)		(2,136	)		(4,949	)

Net loss		(1,267	)		(942	)
Less: Net income attributable to non-redeemable, non-controlling interest		66			87
Net income (loss)								(4,856	)		6,120			(6,123	)		5,178
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-redeemable, non-controlling interest								(105	)		81			(39	)		168

Net loss attributable to RigNet, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,333	)	$	(1,029	)
Net income (loss) attributable to RigNet, Inc. stockholders							$	(4,751	)	$	6,039		$	(6,084	)	$	5,010

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Net loss	$	(1,267	)	$	(942	)
Net income (loss)							$	(4,856	)	$	6,120		$	(6,123	)	$	5,178
Foreign currency translation		542			(4,583	)		(2,133	)		3,255			(1,591	)		(1,328	)

Comprehensive loss		(725	)		(5,525	)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest		66			87
Comprehensive income (loss)								(6,989	)		9,375			(7,714	)		3,850
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest								(105	)		81			(39	)		168

Comprehensive loss attributable to RigNet, Inc. stockholders	$	(791	)	$	(5,612	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to RigNet, Inc. stockholders							$	(6,884	)	$	9,294		$	(7,675	)	$	3,682


LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
Net income (loss) attributable to RigNet, Inc. common stockholders							$	(4,751	)	$	6,039		$	(6,084	)	$	5,010

Net loss attributable to RigNet, Inc. common stockholders	$	(1,333	)	$	(1,029	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to RigNet, Inc. common stockholders, basic							$	(0.27	)	$	0.35		$	(0.35	)	$	0.29

Net loss per share attributable to RigNet, Inc. common stockholders, basic	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)

Net loss per share attributable to RigNet, Inc. common stockholders, diluted	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to RigNet, Inc. common stockholders, diluted							$	(0.27	)	$	0.34		$	(0.35	)	$	0.28

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic		17,613			17,463			17,634			17,499			17,624			17,482

Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted		17,613			17,463			17,634			17,893			17,624			17,857

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,267	)	$	(942	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Net income (loss)							$	(6,123	)	$	5,178
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		8,243			8,096			17,256			16,307
Impairment of intangible assets								397			—
Stock-based compensation		714			949			1,842			1,982
Amortization of deferred financing costs		39			44			85			87
Deferred taxes		127			246			(1,627	)		202
Accretion of discount of contingent consideration payable for acquisition of Tecnor		141			—
Accretion of discount of contingent consideration for acquisition of Tecnor								234			—
Gain on sales of property, plant and equipment, net of retirements		(16	)		(12	)		(150	)		(13	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition:
Accounts receivable		(1,683	)		4,635			13,676			2,954
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		3,370			(1,162	)		4,670			(4,561	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(2,846	)		(1,188	)		(2,727	)		(161	)
Accounts payable		(1,600	)		(5,932	)		(2,777	)		(2,519	)
Accrued expenses		(4,021	)		(2,597	)		(5,952	)		(9,939	)
Deferred revenue		197			584			(1,161	)		314
Other liabilities		492			3,101			797			3,604

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,890			5,822			18,440			13,435


Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of Orgtec S.A.P.I. de C.V., d.b.a. Tecnor		(4,841	)		—			(4,841	)		—
Capital expenditures		(4,148	)		(8,236	)		(9,430	)		(14,331	)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment		131			76			183			21
Decrease in restricted cash		497			104
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash								(1,255	)		419

Net cash used in investing activities		(8,361	)		(8,056	)		(15,343	)		(13,891	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock								644			105
Subsidiary distributions to non-controlling interest		(123	)		(168	)		(123	)		(168	)
Repayments of long-term debt		(2,140	)		(2,163	)		(4,280	)		(4,324	)
Payment of financing fees		(100	)		—			(100	)		—
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		—			118			—			92

Net cash used in financing activities		(2,363	)		(2,213	)		(3,859	)		(4,295	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(8,834	)		(4,447	)		(762	)		(4,751	)


Cash and cash equivalents:
Balance, January 1,		60,468			66,576			60,468			66,576
Changes in foreign currency translation		345			(1,340	)		(250	)		(301	)


Balance, March 31,	$	51,979		$	60,789
Balance, June 30,							$	59,456		$	61,524


Supplemental disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	2,329		$	1,628		$	4,910		$	5,455
Interest paid	$	486		$	471		$	991		$	940
Non-cash investing - capital expenditures accrued	$	1,581		$	2,234		$	969		$	4,221
Non-cash investing - contingent earn-out liability for Tecnor acquisition	$	9,810		$	—		$	6,425		$	—
Liabilities assumed - Tecnor acquistion	$	2,408		$	—
Liabilities assumed - Tecnor acquisition							$	2,408		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Non-Redeemable, Non-Controlling Interest				Total Equity				Common Stock						Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Non-Redeemable, Non-Controlling Interest				Total Equity
	Shares			Amount								Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Shares								Amount											Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)				Total Stockholders’ Equity				Non-Redeemable, Non-Controlling Interest				Total Equity
	(in thousands)																											(in thousands)
Balance, January 1, 2015		17,630		$	18	Additional Paid-In Capital	$	137,662	Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			$	10,931			Total Stockholders’ Equity	$	(6,682	)	Non-Redeemable, Non-Controlling Interest		$	141,929	Total Equity			$	162			$	142,091		17,630		$	18			$	137,662			$	10,931			$	(6,682	)		$	141,929			$	162	$	142,091
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options																													5				—		105			—				—				105				—				105
Issuance of restricted common stock, net of share cancellations																													58				—		—			—				—				—				—				—
Stock-based compensation																													—				—		1,982			—				—				1,982				—				1,982
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation																													—				—		92			—				—				92				—				92
Foreign currency translation																													—				—		—			—				(1,328	)			(1,328	)			—				(1,328	)
Non-controlling owner distributions																													—				—		—			—				—				—				(168	)			(168	)
Net income																													—				—		—			5,010				—				5,010				168				5,178

Issuance of restricted common stock, net of share cancellations		43			—		—			—			—				—				—				—

Stock-based compensation		—			—		949			—			—				949				—				949

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		—			—		118			—			—				118				—				118

Foreign currency translation		—			—		—			—			(4,583	)			(4,583	)			—				(4,583	)

Non-controlling owner distributions		—			—		—			—			—				—				(168	)			(168	)

Net income (loss)		—			—		—			(1,029	)		—				(1,029	)			87				(942	)


Balance, March 31, 2015		17,673		$	18	$	138,729		$	9,902		$	(11,265	)		$	137,384			$	81			$	137,465
Balance, June 30, 2015																													17,693			$	18	$	139,841		$	15,941			$	(8,010	)		$	147,790			$	162			$	147,952


Balance, January 1, 2016		17,758		$	18	$	143,012		$	(6,043	)	$	(13,836	)		$	123,151			$	162			$	123,313				17,758			$	18	$	143,012		$	(6,043	)		$	(13,836	)		$	123,151			$	162			$	123,313
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options																													81				—		644			—				—				644				—				644
Restricted common stock cancellations																													(33	)			—		—			—				—				—				—				—
Stock-based compensation																													—				—		1,842			—				—				1,842				—				1,842
Foreign currency translation																													—				—		—			—				(1,591	)			(1,591	)			—				(1,591	)
Non-controlling owner distributions																													—				—		—			—				—				—				(123	)			(123	)
Net loss																													—				—		—			(6,084	)			—				(6,084	)			(39	)			(6,123	)

Restricted common stock cancellations		(26	)		—		—			—			—				—				—				—
Balance, June 30, 2016																													17,806			$	18	$	145,498		$	(12,127	)		$	(15,427	)		$	117,962			$	—			$	117,962

Stock-based compensation		—			—		714			—			—				714				—				714

Foreign currency translation		—			—		—			—			542				542				—				542

Non-controlling owner distributions		—			—		—			—			—				—				(123	)			(123	)

Net income (loss)		—			—		—			(1,333	)		—				(1,333	)			66				(1,267	)


Balance, March 31, 2016		17,732		$	18	$	143,726		$	(7,376	)	$	(13,294	)		$	123,074			$	105			$	123,179

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of RigNet, Inc. (the Company or RigNet) include all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be perceived with certainty. Estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information becomes available and as the Company’s operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from estimates. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016.

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company identified a misclassification in the presentation of operating expenses between selling and marketing expense and general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. This error resulted in the understatement of selling and marketing expense of ~~$0.9~~$0.6 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and an offsetting overstatement of general and administrative expense, in the same ~~amounts, for the three months ended March 31, 2015.~~amounts. The prior period amounts have been revised to reflect the correct classification. The correction had no impact on total expenses or net ~~loss~~income for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015.

Please refer to RigNet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 for information regarding the Company’s accounting policies.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The core principle of this amendment is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14 (ASU 2015-14), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08 (ASU 2016-08), Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations. The amendments are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In ~~August 2015,~~April and May of 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. ~~2015-14~~2016-10 (ASU ~~2015-14)~~2016-10) and Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12 (ASU 2016-12), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)~~: Deferral of the Effective Date.~~, respectively, that provide scope amendments, performance obligations clarification and practical expedients. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03), Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (Topic 835), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-15 (ASU 2015-15), in which the SEC staff clarified its position on presenting and measuring debt issuance costs in connection with line of credit arrangements. The SEC staff would not object to deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement. ASU 2015-03 became effective for annual and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-03 as of January 1, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 did not have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16 (ASU 2015-16), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. This new standard specifies that an acquirer should recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, eliminating the current requirement to retrospectively account for these adjustments. Additionally, the full

effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts should be recognized in the same period as the adjustments to the provisional amounts. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 as of January 1, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-16 did not have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (ASU 2016-02), Leases. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. This ASU introduces a new lessee model that generally ~~brings~~requires reflection of leases on the balance sheet. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (ASU 2016-09), Share Based Compensation. The new ASU simplifies several aspects of share based compensation including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company ~~is currently evaluating~~adopted ASU 2016-09 in the ~~impact~~second quarter of 2016 and have applied the guidance as of January 1, 2016. The adoption of this ASU ~~will~~did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

On February 4, 2016, RigNet completed its acquisition of ~~Orgtec S.A.P.I. de C.V., d.b.a~~ TECNOR ~~(TECNOR)~~ for an estimated aggregate purchase price of ~~$14.8~~$11.6 million. Of this aggregate purchase price, RigNet ~~has~~ paid $4.8 million in cash in February 2016 and ~~estimates paying $0.2~~paid $0.3 million in escrow subject to final net working capital adjustments ~~payable in June 2016~~ and ~~$9.8~~estimates paying $6.5 million in an earn-out payable in 2018. The estimate of the earn-out payable is preliminary and subject to change based on the achievement of certain post-closing performance targets under the acquisition agreement. The maximum earn-out is $21.3 million. TECNOR provides telecommunications solutions for remote sites on land, sea and air, including a wide array of equipment, voice and data services, satellite coverage and bandwidth options in Mexico. These services are provided to industrial, commercial and private users in diverse activity segments including mission critical military and government applications, oil and gas operations, commercial fishing and leisure. TECNOR is based in Monterrey, Mexico.

The assets and liabilities of TECNOR have been recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the underlying net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities has been recorded as goodwill. The Company’s allocation of the purchase price is preliminary as the amounts are still being finalized.

The earn-out for TECNOR is measured at fair value, based on level 3 inputs, with any change to fair value recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in each reporting period. There was no change in fair value to the TECNOR earn-out for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 other than accretion of ~~discount.~~discount and the correction of error in estimated purchase price.

The goodwill of ~~$11.1~~$6.7 million arising from the acquisition consists largely of synergies and other benefits that the Company believes will result from combining the operations of the Company and TECNOR, as well as other intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as assembled workforce in place at the date of acquisition. None of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The acquisition of TECNOR, including goodwill, is included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as of the acquisition date and is reflected in the Western Hemisphere reporting segment.


	Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life (Years)		Fair Market Values					Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life (Years)		Fair Market Values
			(in thousands)							(in thousands)
Accounts Receivable					$	2,672						$	2,672
Other assets						68							1,280
Property and equipment						809							809
Backlog		2.0		366					2.0		366
Customer Relationships		7.0		2,210					7.0		2,210

Total identifiable intangible assets						2,576							2,576
Goodwill						11,061							6,669
Accounts Payable						(1,914	)						(1,914	)
Accrued Expenses						(494	)						(494	)

Total purchase price					$	14,778	(a)					$	11,598	(a) (b)

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, RigNet incurred $0.1 and $0.2 million, respectively, of acquisition-related costs, which are reported as general and administrative expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

TECNOR’s revenue and net income were ~~$2.1~~$3.0 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.2 million, respectively, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. TECNOR’s revenue and net income were $5.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

The following table represents supplemental pro forma information as if the TECNOR acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015. Pro forma adjustments include:

The Company is exposed to various business and credit risks including interest rate, foreign currency, credit and liquidity risks.

The Company has significant interest-bearing liabilities at variable interest rates which generally price monthly. The Company’s variable borrowing rates are tied to LIBOR resulting in interest rate risk (see Note 6 – Long-Term Debt). The Company presently does not ~~currently use financial instruments to~~ hedge these ~~interest rate risk exposures,~~risks, but ~~evaluates this~~evaluate financial risk on a ~~continual~~regular basis and may ~~put~~utilize financial instruments ~~in place~~ in the future if deemed ~~necessary by management.~~necessary.

The Company has exposure to foreign currency risk, as a portion of the Company’s activities are conducted in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Currently, the ~~Australian dollar, the~~ Norwegian kroner, ~~and~~ the British pound sterling and the Australian dollar are the currencies that could materially impact the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The ~~Company’s historical experience with exchange rates for these currencies has been relatively stable, and, consequently, the~~ Company ~~typically~~presently does not ~~use~~hedge these risks, but evaluate financial ~~instruments to hedge this~~ risk ~~but evaluates it~~ on a ~~continual~~regular basis and may ~~put~~utilize financial instruments ~~in place~~ in the future if deemed necessary. Foreign currency translations are reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Credit risk, with respect to accounts receivable, is due to the limited number of customers concentrated in the oil and gas industry. The Company mitigates the risk of financial loss from defaults through defined collection terms in each contract or service agreement and periodic evaluations of the collectability of accounts receivable. ~~The evaluations include a review of customer credit reports and past transaction history with the customer.~~ The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts which is adjusted when the Company becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations or as a result of changes in the overall aging of accounts receivable.

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances with major financial institutions which, at times, exceed federally insured limits. The Company monitors the financial condition of the financial institutions and has not experienced losses associated with these accounts during 2016 or 2015. Liquidity risk is managed by continuously monitoring forecasted and actual cash flows and by matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities (see Note 6 – Long-Term Debt).

Goodwill resulted from prior acquisitions as the consideration paid for the acquired businesses exceeded the fair value of acquired identifiable net tangible and intangible assets. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually with additional evaluations being performed when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable.

The Company acquired ~~$11.1~~$6.7 million inof goodwill in the TECNOR acquisition completed on February 4, 2016 (see Note 2 – Business Combinations).

The Company performs its annual impairment test on July 31^stof each year, with the most recent annual test being performed as of July 31, 2015. The July 2015 annual test resulted in a full $10.9 million impairment of goodwill in the North America Land reporting unit, which reports through the Western Hemisphere reportable segment. This impairment resulted from reduced internal cash flow projections for the North America Land reporting unit which has been adversely impacted by a significant decline in U.S. land rig counts since December 2014. The July 2015 annual test resulted in no impairment to the remaining goodwill as the fair value of each other reporting unit continues to ~~significantly~~ exceed the carrying value plus goodwill.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, goodwill was ~~$28.7~~$23.3 million and $18.1 million, respectively. In addition to additions from acquisition, goodwill increases or decreases in value due to the effect of foreign currency translation.

Intangibles consist of customer relationships (acquired as part of the OilCamp, Nessco, Inmarsat’s Enterprise Energy business unit and TECNOR acquisitions), as well as trade name (acquired as part of the Nessco acquisition), backlog (acquired as part of the Nessco, Inmarsat’s Enterprise Energy business unit and TECNOR acquisitions), licenses (acquired primarily as part of the Inmarsat’s Enterprise Energy business unit acquisition) and internal-use software. The Company’s intangibles have useful lives ranging from 1.7 to 9.0 years and are amortized on a straight-line basis. Impairment testing is performed when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.

In June 2016, the Company identified a triggering event for a license in Kazakhstan associated with a decline in cash flow projections. In June 2016, the Company conducted an intangibles impairment test and as a result of such test, recognized a $0.4 million impairment of licenses in the Corporate segment, which was the full amount of the Company’s intangibles within Kazakhstan.

In July 2015, the Company identified a triggering event in the North America Land reporting unit associated with a significant decline in U.S. land rig counts since December 2014. This circumstance resulted in a reduction in the Company’s cash flow projections during the revision of internal forecasts. In July 2015, the Company conducted an intangibles impairment test and as a result of such test, recognized a $1.7 million impairment of customer relationships, the full amount of intangibles within the North America Land reporting unit, which reports through the Western Hemisphere reportable segment. NoExcept as noted above, no other impairment indicators have been identified in any reporting unit as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, intangibles were ~~$20.5 million and~~ $19.0 ~~million, respectively.~~million. During the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized amortization expense of $1.3 million and ~~$1.3~~$1.5 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized amortization expense of $2.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth expected amortization expense of intangibles for the remainder of 2016 and the following years (in thousands):


2016		3,684		2,822
2017		4,912		4,717
2018		4,744		4,550
2019		3,428		3,307
2020		2,552		2,490
Thereafter		1,212		1,145

	$	20,532	$	19,031

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had restricted cash of ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million and $0.5 million in current assets, respectively. ~~This~~The restricted cash in current assets as of June 30, 2016 is ~~being~~primarily used for working capital adjustments for the TECNOR acquisition. The restricted cash in current assets as of December 31, 2015 was primarily used to collateralize outstanding performance bonds for Nessco’s telecoms systems integration projects which were in effect prior to RigNet acquiring ~~Nessco~~Nessco.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had restricted cash of $1.5 million in long-term assets. The restricted cash in long-term assets is primarily used to collateralize a performance bond in the Eastern Hemisphere segment (see Note 6 – Long-Term Debt).

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the following credit facilities and long-term debt arrangements with financial institutions were in place:


	March 31,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Term loan, net of unamortized deferred financing costs	$	40,458		$	42,659		$	38,364		$	42,659
Revolving loan		35,000			35,000			35,000			35,000

		75,458			77,659			73,364			77,659
Less: Current maturities of long-term debt		(8,383	)		(8,421	)		(8,388	)		(8,421	)

	$	67,075		$	69,238		$	64,976		$	69,238

The Company has a term loan (Term Loan) issued under the amended and restated credit agreement ~~(credit agreement)~~ with four participating financial ~~institutions.~~institutions (credit agreement). On October 3, 2013, the Company amended its Term Loan, which increased the principal balance to $60.0 million from $54.6 million and extended the maturity of the loan from July 2017 to October 2018.

The amended Term Loan bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.5% to 2.5% based on a ratio of funded debt to ~~Adjusted~~Consolidated EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in the credit agreement. Interest is payable monthly along with quarterly principal installments of $2.1 million, with the balance due October 2018. The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 were ~~2.2%~~2.4% and 2.0%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were 2.3% and 2.0%, respectively, with an interest rate of ~~2.2%~~2.5% at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

The Term Loan is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Term Loan had an outstanding principal balance of ~~$40.7~~$38.6 million.

Under the ~~amended and restated~~ credit agreement, ~~with four participating financial institutions dated October 3, 2013,~~ the Company ~~secured~~maintains a $125.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a $15 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, $35.0 million in draws remain outstanding. The revolving credit facility matures in October 2018 with any outstanding borrowings then payable.

~~The~~Borrowings under the revolving ~~loan bears~~credit facility bear an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.5% to 2.5% based on a ratio of funded debt to ~~Adjusted~~Consolidated EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in the credit agreement. The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 was ~~2.2%~~2.3% and 2.0%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was 2.3% and 1.9%, respectively, with an interest rate of ~~2.2%~~2.5% at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

On September 14, 2012, NesscoInvsat Limited, a subsidiary of RigNet, secured a performance bond facility with a lender in the amount of £4.0 million, or ~~$5.8~~$5.4 million. This facility has a maturity date of June 30, 2017. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the amount available under this facility was ~~£1.6~~£1.7 million or $2.3 million.

~~Certain legacy Nessco performance bonds also require~~In June 2016, the Company ~~to maintain~~secured a performance bond facility with a lender in the amount of $1.5 million for its Eastern Hemisphere segment. This facility has a maturity date of June 2021. The Company maintains restricted cash ~~balances~~ on a dollar ~~of restricted cash~~ for a dollar ~~of performance bond~~ basis to ~~collateralize outstanding performance bonds.~~secure this facility.

The Company’s credit agreement contains certain covenants and restrictions, including restricting the payment of cash dividends under default and maintaining certain financial covenants such as a ratio of funded debt to ~~Adjusted~~Consolidated EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in the credit agreement, of less than or equal to 2.5 to 1.0 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. If any default occurs related to these covenants, the unpaid principal and any accrued interest shall be declared immediately due and payable. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company believes it was in compliance with all covenants.

In February 2016, the Company amended its credit agreement with the most significant changes being the definition of ~~consolidated~~Consolidated EBITDA, the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio and the timing associated with delivery of financial statements and compliance certificates to the administrative agent.

The following table sets forth the aggregate principal maturities of long-term debt, net of deferred financing cost amortization for the remainder of 2016 and the following years (in thousands):


2016	$	6,285	$	4,191
2017		8,521		8,521
2018		60,652		60,652

Total debt, including current maturities	$	75,458	$	73,364

The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:

The Company’s non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangibles and property, plant and equipment, are measured at fair value, based on level 3 inputs, when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized.

The earn-out for TECNOR, is measured at fair value, based on level 3 inputs, with any change to fair value recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in each reporting period. There was no change in fair value to the TECNOR earn-out for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 other than accretion of ~~discount.~~discount and the correction of error in estimated purchase price (see Note 2 – Business Combinations).

The Company’s effective income tax rate was -34.1% and 30.1% for ~~both~~ the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and ~~March 31,~~ 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective income tax rate was -53.6% and 48.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate is ~~not meaningful due to the restructuring~~affected by factors including changes in valuation allowances, fluctuations in income across jurisdictions with varying tax rates, and ~~executive departure charges recorded primarily~~changes in ~~the US domestic operations which significantly decreased the Company’s consolidated pre-tax book~~ income tax reserves, including related penalties and ~~thus increased the valuation allowance recognized in both quarters.~~interest.

The Company has computed the provision for taxes for the current and comparative periods using the actual year-to-date effective tax rate. The Company’s financial projections for those periods did not provide the level of detail necessary to calculate a forecasted effective tax rate.

The IRS finalized an audit of the Company’s 2013 income tax return in March 2016. There were no assessments or material impact to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a result the audit.

The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that a decrease of up to $0.8 million in unrecognized tax benefits, including related interest and penalties, may be necessary within the coming year due to lapse in statute of limitations. If the tax benefits were recognized the impact to the tax provision would be $0.6 million, which would affect the effective tax rate.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company granted a total of ~~529,360~~616,897 restricted stock units (RSUs) to certain directors, officers and employees of the Company under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2010 Plan). Of these, the Company granted ~~300,300~~316,017 RSUs to certain officers and employees that generally vest over a four year period of continued employment, with 25% of the RSUs vesting on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. These also include 156,430 RSUs issued to certain officers and employees that generally cliff vest after 3 years, 65,084 RSUs issued to directors that vest in May 2017, and ~~72,630~~79,366 performance based RSUs issued to certain officers that generally cliff vest after 3 years and are subject to certain performance based targets. The ultimate number of performance based RSUs issued is based on a multiple determined by certain performance based targets.

The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date of the award. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the entire award.

~~Under~~During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company also granted 100,000 stock options with an exercise price of $12.60 to an officer of the Company under the 2010 ~~Plan, options~~Plan. Options granted have, a contractual term of ten years and vest over a four year period of continued employment, with 25% of the options vesting on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date.

The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option valuation model, which uses certain assumptions as of the date of grant. ~~There were no stock options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2016.~~ The assumptions used for the stock option grants made during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, were as follows:

Based on these assumptions, the weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 was ~~$12.99~~$6.46 and $13.09 per option.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, 33,400 shares of restricted stock, 57,851 RSUs and 132,370 stock options were forfeited.

Stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 was ~~$0.7~~$1.8 million and ~~$0.9~~$2.0 million, respectively. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, there was ~~$10.3~~$10.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options and restricted stock expected to vest. This cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of ~~3.0~~2.7 years.

The Company utilized a consulting vendor, KKR Capstone, which performs services exclusively for portfolio companies of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (KKR). KKR is a significant stockholder of the Company. The Company purchased no consulting services from KKR Capstone in the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The Company purchased consulting services in the ordinary course of business totaling ~~$0.1~~$0.2 and $0.3 million from KKR Capstone during the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2015.~~June 30, 2015, respectively.

Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) are computed by dividing net ~~loss~~income (loss) attributable to RigNet common stockholders by the number of basic shares outstanding. Basic shares equal the total of the common shares outstanding, weighted for the average days outstanding for the period. Basic shares exclude the dilutive effect of common shares that could potentially be issued due to the exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net ~~loss~~income (loss) attributable to RigNet common stockholders by the number of diluted shares outstanding. Diluted shares equal the total of the basic shares outstanding and all potentially issuable shares, other than antidilutive shares, if any, weighted for the average days outstanding for the period. The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect. In periods when a net loss is reported, all common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation because they would have an anti-dilutive effect, meaning the loss per share would be reduced. Therefore, in periods when a loss is reported, basic and dilutive loss per share are the same.

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, there were approximately ~~1,284,772~~1,591,554 and 1,309,565 potentially issuable shares, respectively, excluded from the Company’s calculation of diluted ~~EPS. Of~~EPS of which ~~1,161,948~~1,073,579 and 1,096,848, respectively, were excluded due to the antidilutive position of the security. The remaining ~~122,824~~517,975 and 212,717, respectively, were excluded because the Company incurred a loss in the period and to include them would have been anti-dilutive, meaning the loss per share would be reduced.

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, there were approximately ~~566,281~~162,755 and 163,174, respectively, potentially issuable shares excluded from the Company’s calculation of diluted ~~EPS. Of which, 183,462 shares were excluded~~EPS due to the antidilutive position of the security. ~~The remaining 382,819~~

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, 393,878 and 374,338 shares of unexercised or unvested securities, respectively, were ~~excluded because the Company incurred a loss~~included in the ~~period and to include them would have been anti-dilutive, meaning the loss~~diluted earnings per share ~~would be reduced.~~computation due to the dilutive effect.

The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is a claimant or a defendant in various legal proceedings, including proceedings as to which the Company has insurance coverage and those that may involve the filing of liens against the Company or its assets. The Company does not consider its exposure in these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to be material.

The Company’s Telecoms Systems Integration (TSI) business reached a settlement in the first quarter of 2016 related to a contract dispute associated with a percentage of completion project. The dispute related to the payment for work related to certain change orders. After the settlement, the Company recognized $2.3 million of gain in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. After the aforementioned settlement and gain, the Company now has an accrued estimated loss of $12.0 million for this project, which represents the total evident probable and estimable loss expected to be incurred over the life of this project. The Company expects remaining estimated project completion costs of ~~$1.0~~$0.7 million. The Company will continue incurring costs and recognizing revenue related to this change order, as the project is not yet complete and is expected to continue incurring costs ~~into the second quarter of~~through 2016. The ultimate actual results from the project may differ from the estimated $12.0 million loss.

The Company has incurred legal expenses of $0.2 million in connection with the dispute for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

In 2013, RigNet’s internal compliance program detected potential violations of U.S. sanctions by one of its foreign subsidiaries in connection with certain of its customers’ rigs that were moved into the territorial waters of countries sanctioned by the United States. The Company estimates that it received total revenue of approximately $0.1 million during the period related to the potential violations. The Company has voluntarily self-reported the potential violations to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and retained outside counsel who conducted an investigation of the matter under the supervision of the Company’s Audit Committee and submitted a report to OFAC and BIS. The Company continues cooperating with OFAC and BIS with respect to resolution of the matter.

The Company incurred legal expenses of $0.1 million and $0.1 million in connection with the investigation for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company may continue to incur significant legal fees and related expenses and the investigations may involve management time in the future in order to cooperate with OFAC and BIS. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the investigation, the total costs to be incurred in completing the investigation, the potential impact on personnel, the effect of implementing any further measures that may be necessary to ensure full compliance with applicable laws or to what extent, if at all, the Company could be subject to fines, sanctions or other penalties.

Based on the information available at this time and management’s understanding of the potential sanctions, the Company currently estimates that it may incur penalties associated with these potential violations within a range of ~~$0.2 million~~zero to $1.5 million. The Company has accrued an estimated liability of $0.8 million as management believes this is the most probable outcome. This estimate is based on RigNet’s internal investigation and no assurance can be given as to what, if any, penalties OFAC or BIS will impose or whether it will identify or allege additional violations or remedies.

The Company leases office space under lease agreements expiring on various dates through 2020. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized expense under operating leases of $1.0 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.9 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized expense under operating leases of $2.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, future minimum lease obligations for the remainder of 2016 and future years were as follows (in thousands):


2016		2,995		2,087
2017		3,315		2,838
2018		1,896		1,390
2019		560		603
2020		313		313

	$	9,079	$	7,231

On June 30, 2016, the Company provided notice of early termination of its lease with Hartman Ashford Crossing, LLC for office space located at 1880 S. Dairy Ashford, Houston, TX 77077. In accordance with the terms of that lease, the Company exercised its option for early termination, effective February 28, 2017. The total amount of the lease termination obligation is $0.4 million, of which $0.1 million has been paid. The Company is entitled to reimbursement from the landlord for construction costs and tenant improvements in the amount of $0.5 million, and intends to utilize part of such reimbursement to pay the remainder of the termination payment.

The Company enters into contracts for satellite bandwidth and other network services with certain providers.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company had the following commercial commitments related to satellite and network services for the remainder of 2016 and the four years thereafter (in thousands):


2016	$	28,984	$	20,786
2017		23,989		24,968
2018		15,750		16,116
2019		16,419		16,489
2020		18,017		18,017

	$	103,159	$	96,376

~~On January 31, 2014, RigNet finalized an agreement with Inmarsat to become a distributor of Inmarsat’s Global Xpress (GX) and L-band satellite communications network services.~~ RigNet has agreed, under certain conditions, to purchase up to $65.0 million of capacity from the high-throughput GXInmarsat’s Global Xpress (GX) network during the five years after it becomes operational. The Company expects to utilize GX ~~and L-band services~~ across RigNet’s legacy operations as well as the operations acquired from Inmarsat. The portion of this agreement expected to be committed through ~~2019,~~2020, assuming the GX network is commercially available in 2016, is reflected in the table above.

Segment information is prepared consistent with the components of the enterprise for which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker for the purpose of allocating resources and assessing performance.

Certain operating segments are aggregated into one reportable segment based on similar economic characteristics. Accordingly, RigNet considers its business to consist of three reportable segments:

Corporate and eliminations primarily represents unallocated corporate office activities, interest expenses, income taxes and eliminations.

The Company’s business segment information as of and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, is presented below.

The following table presents revenue earned from the Company’s domestic and international operations for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015. Revenue is based on the location where services are provided or goods are sold. Due to the mobile nature of RigNet’s customer base and the services provided, the Company works closely with its customers to ensure rig or vessel moves are closely monitored to ensure location of service information is properly reflected.


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Domestic	$	15,967	$	22,706	$	16,261	$	20,810	$	32,228	$	43,516
International		46,374		54,944		38,650		54,296		85,024		109,240

Total	$	62,341	$	77,650	$	54,911	$	75,106	$	117,252	$	152,756

The following table presents long-lived assets for the Company’s domestic and international operations as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.


	March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Domestic	$	36,496	$	36,506	$	33,529	$	36,506
International		84,008		73,073		76,481		73,073

Total	$	120,504	$	109,579	$	110,010	$	109,579

InDuring the ~~first quarter of~~three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred pre-tax restructuring expense of $1.1 million in the corporate segment consisting of $0.7 million of termination costs associated with the reduction of 26 employees and $0.4 million of exit costs from the corporate office lease. The termination costs are reported as $0.5 million and $0.2 million in general and administrative expense and cost of revenue, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The $0.4 million of exit costs from the lease for the corporate office are reported as general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred net pre-tax restructuring expense of $0.5 million in the Corporate segment consisting of $0.4 million of exit costs from the corporate office lease and $0.9 million associated with the reduction of 42 employees partially offset by a net reduction to restructuring charges of ~~$0.6~~$0.8 million due to a reversal ~~of $0.8 million~~ of previously accrued restructuring charges for employees that the Company did not release and expense not incurred partially offset by a pre-tax expense of $0.2 million in the corporate segment associated with the reduction of 16 employees. The Company undertook the plan to reduce costs and improve the Company’s competitive position in response to increased stacking and scrapping of rigs and the declining Baker Hughes U.S. land rig count.incurred.

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company instituted a resource reallocation plan ~~(the plan)~~ to vacate and eliminate redundant facilities and eliminate certain excess positions in response to deteriorating oil and gas industry market conditions including declining oil and gas prices, increased stacking and scrapping of rigs and the declining Baker Hughes U.S. ~~land rig count.~~Land Rig Count. The plan primarily consisted of a corporate initiative to reallocate resources from the corporate function and the North America Land reporting unit within the Western Hemisphere segment to growth areas of the Company. ~~The Company undertook~~

During the ~~plan to reduce costs and improve the Company’s competitive position.~~

~~In the first quarter of~~six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company incurred pre-tax expense of approximately $6.2 million in the corporate segment related to the plan. The restructuring costs include $2.4 million associated with the ~~lay-off~~reduction of 59 employees, of which $1.9 million and $0.5 million are reported as general and administrative expense and cost of revenue, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The restructuring costs also include $3.8 million associated with ceasing the use of and vacating six Company facilities, of which $2.3 million and $1.5 million are reported as general and administrative expense and cost of revenue, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

The Company undertook these plans in 2015 and 2016 to reduce costs and improve the Company’s competitive position.

~~On January 7, 2016,~~ Marty Jimmerson, the former CFO, ~~was appointed~~served as Interim ~~Chief Executive Officer (CEO)~~CEO and President from January 7, 2016 to May 31, 2016, to replace Mark Slaughter, the prior CEO and ~~President effective January 7, 2016. Marty Jimmerson’s appointment will continue while~~President. Mr. Jimmerson departed the Company ~~searches for a permanent CEO and President.~~on June 1, 2016. In connection with the ~~executive~~ departure of ~~our prior CEO,~~Mr. Slaughter, in the first quarter of 2016 the Company incurred a pre-tax executive departure expense of $1.9 million in the ~~corporate~~Corporate segment. On May 31, 2016, Steven E. Pickett was named Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and President of the Company.

On July 15, 2016, the Company announced an organizational and cost restructuring plan. The Company anticipates incurring a pre-tax expense of approximately $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2016 consisting of the reduction of 73 employees and related expenses. The Company anticipates that it will substantially complete the plan by December 31, 2016. The Company is executing this plan to further reduce costs and improve its operational efficiencies by reducing layers of management and streamlining decision making.

Item 2.Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 included elsewhere herein, and with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our annual report and elsewhere in this quarterly report. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. These statements may include statements about:

In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “pursue,” “target,” “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes. All of these types of statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are largely based on Company expectations, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by Company management. These estimates and assumptions reflect management’s best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors. Although the Company believes such estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties beyond its control. In addition, management’s assumptions may prove to be inaccurate. The Company cautions that the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not guarantees of future performance, and it cannot assure any reader that such statements will be realized or the forward-looking statements or events will occur. Future results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in forward-looking statements due to factors listed in the “Risk Factors” section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual future results, performance or achievements may vary materially from any projected future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and other than as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

We are a global provider of managed remote communications, telecoms systems integration (project management of turn-key engineered telecommunications solutions) and collaborative applications dedicated to the oil and gas industry, focusing on offshore and onshore drilling rigs, energy production facilities and maritime. We focus on developing customer relationships in the oil and gas industry resulting in a significant portion of our revenue being concentrated among a few customers. In addition, due to the concentration of our customers in the oil and gas industry, we face the challenge of service demands fluctuating with the exploration and development plans and capital expenditures of that industry.

Network service customers are primarily served under fixed-price ~~day-rate~~ contracts, ~~which are based~~either on ~~the concept of pay-per-day of use and are consistent with other service terms used in the oil and gas industry.~~a monthly or day rate basis or for equipment sales. Our contracts are generally in the form of Master Service Agreements, or MSAs, with specific services being provided under individual service orders that have a term of one to three years with renewal options, while land-based locations are generally shorter term or terminable on short notice without a penalty. Service orders are executed under the MSA for individual remote sites or groups of sites, and generally may be terminated early on short notice without penalty in the event of force majeure, breach of the MSA or cold stacking of a drilling rig (when a rig is taken out of service and is expected to be idle for a protracted period of time).

Certain operating segments are aggregated into one reportable segment based on similar economic characteristics. We operate three reportable segments, which are managed as distinct business units by our chief operating decision-maker.

Cost of revenue consists primarily of satellite charges, voice and data termination costs, network operations expenses, internet connectivity fees, equipment purchases for TSI projects and direct service labor. Satellite charges consist of the costs associated with obtaining satellite bandwidth (the measure of capacity) used in the transmission of service to and from leased satellites. Direct service labor consists of field technicians, our Network Operations Center (NOC) employees, and other employees who directly provide services to customers. Network operations expenses consist primarily of costs associated with the operation of our NOC, which is maintained 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Depreciation and amortization is recognized on all property, plant and equipment either installed at a customer’s site or held at our corporate and regional offices, as well as intangibles arising from acquisitions and internal use software. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions, travel costs and marketing communications. General and administrative expenses consist of expenses associated with our management, finance, contract, support and administrative functions.

Profitability generally increases or decreases at a site as we add or lose customers and ~~increase~~ value-added services. Assumptions used in developing the ~~day~~ rates for a site may not cover cost variances from inherent uncertainties or unforeseen obstacles, including both physical conditions and unexpected problems encountered with third party service providers.

On February 4, 2016, we completed our acquisition of Orgtec S.A.P.I. de C.V., d.b.a TECNOR (TECNOR) for an aggregate purchase price of ~~$14.8~~$11.6 million. Of this aggregate purchase price, we paid $4.8 million of cash in February 2016 and paid $0.3 million in escrow subject to final net working capital adjustments and estimate paying ~~$0.2 million in net working capital adjustment in June 2016 and $9.8~~$6.5 million in an earn-out payable in 2018. The estimate of the earn-out payable is preliminary and subject to change based on the achievement of certain post-closing performance targets under the acquisition agreement. The maximum earn-out is $21.3 million. TECNOR provides telecommunications solutions for remote sites on land, sea and air, including a wide array of equipment, voice and data services, satellite coverage and bandwidth options in Mexico. These services are provided to industrial, commercial and private users in diverse activity segments from mission critical military and government applications, oil and gas operations, commercial fishing and leisure. TECNOR is based in Monterrey, Mexico. The acquisition of TECNOR, including goodwill, is included in the Western Hemisphere reporting segment.

OnBetween January 7, 2016 and May 31, 2016, Marty Jimmerson, our former ~~Chief Financial Officer, was appointed~~CFO, served as Interim Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and President, ~~to replace~~replacing Mark Slaughter, our prior CEO and ~~President effective January 7,~~President. Mr. Jimmerson departed the Company on June 1, 2016. ~~Marty Jimmerson’s appointment will continue while we search for a permanent CEO and President.~~ In connection with the ~~executive~~ departure of ~~our prior CEO, we incurred a pre-tax executive departure charge of approximately $1.9 million~~Mr. Slaughter, in ~~the first quarter of 2016.~~

In the first quarter of 2016 we incurred a pre-tax executive departure expense of $1.9 million in the Corporate segment. On May 31, 2016, Steven E. Pickett was named Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and President of the Company.

On July 15, 2016, we announced an additional organizational and cost restructuring plan. Pursuant to the plan, we anticipate incurring pre-tax expense of approximately $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2016 resulting from the reduction of 73 employees and related expenses. We anticipate that we will substantially complete the plan by December 31, 2016. We are executing this plan to further reduce costs and improve our operational efficiencies by reducing layers of management and streamlining decision making.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred net pre-tax restructuring expense of $0.5 million in the Corporate segment consisting of $0.4 million of exit costs from the corporate office lease and a termination expense of $0.9 million associated with the reduction of 42 employees. We undertook these plans to reduce costs and improve our competitive position. This was partially offset by a net reduction to restructuring charges of ~~$0.6~~$0.8 million due to a reversal ~~of $0.8 million~~ of previously accrued restructuring charges for employees that we did not release and expense not incurred partially offset by a pre-tax expense of $0.2 million in the corporate segment associated with the reduction of 16 employees. The Company undertook the plan to reduce costs and improve the Company’s competitive position in response to increased stacking and scrapping of rigs and the declining Baker Hughes U.S. land rig count.incurred.

In the first quarter of 2016, we reached a settlement related to a contract dispute associated with a percentage of completion project. The dispute related to the payment for work related to certain change orders. After the settlement, we recognized $2.3 million of gain in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. After the aforementioned settlement and ~~aforementioned~~ gain, we now have an accrued estimated loss of $12.0 million for this project, which represents the total evident probable and estimable loss expected to be incurred over the life of this project. We expect remaining estimated project completion costs of ~~$1.0~~$0.7 million. We will continue incurring costs and recognizing revenue related to this change order, as the project is not yet complete and is expected to continue incurring costs ~~into the second quarter of~~through 2016.

Uncertainties and negative trends in the oil and gas industry could continue to impact our profitability. The fundamentals of the oil and gas industry we serve have deteriorated. Oil prices have declined significantly throughout 2015 and into 2016 from the recent high in mid-year 2014 due to lower-than-expected global oil demand growth, increased supply from U.S. unconventional sources and increased production from several ~~other~~ international countries. Generally, a prolonged lower oil price environment ~~restrains increases in~~decreases exploration and development drilling investment, utilization of drilling rigs and the activity of the global oil and gas industry that we serve. Several global exploration and production companies have reduced their 2016 capital budgets compared to 2015 and 2014 as a result of lower oil prices.

Although management has observed a ~~recent and~~ sustained decline in demand, the global oil and gas industry that we serve is ~~moving~~expected to move towards higher specification drilling rigs to perform contract drilling services either as a response to increased technical challenges or for the safety, reliability and efficiency typical of the newer, more capable rigs. This trend is commonly referred to as the bifurcation of the drilling fleet. Bifurcation is occurring in both the jackup and floater rig classes and is evidenced by the higher specification drilling rigs operating at generally higher overall utilization levels and day rates than the lower specification or standard

drilling rigs. As the offshore drilling sector continues to construct and deliver newer, higher specification drilling units, we expect lower specification drilling units to experience reduced overall utilization and day rates leading to a significant number of rigs being either warm or cold-stacked or scrapped. Although management has observed the pace of cold stacking and scrapping of offshore lower specification drilling rigs recently increasing, management plans to aggressively pursue opportunities to provide our services on the higher specification new build offshore rigs.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we were serving a total of ~~232~~211 jack up, semi-submersible and drillship rigs, a decrease of 4959 rigs since ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. We calculate our market share to be based on an IHS-Petrodata RigBase Current Activity report as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 excluding cold-stacked rigs, rigs under construction, rigs out of service and rigs in sanctioned countries, as the marketplace does

not consider these rigs to be addressable. We approximate our addressable market share to be ~~31.3%~~29.5% as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, which is down compared to 35.4% as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we were serving ~~499~~491 strategic initiative sites, a decrease of 2724 sites since ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Strategic initiative sites include production facilities, support vessels and international onshore rigs. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we were also serving ~~287~~236 other sites, a decrease of 206 sites since ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Other sites include U.S. onshore drilling rigs, completion facilities, remote support offices and supply bases.

~~Several drilling~~Drilling rig owners have ~~recently~~ announced and begun to cold stack and scrap drilling rigs which generally are older and not expected to be competitive. We expect that additional announcements are likely in the near future as a result of the overall lower global demand for offshore drilling rigs and expectations that many of the scheduled new build drilling rigs will be delivered and compete for global rig activity. Since October 1, 2014, we have been notified directly by customers or through public announcements that 7795 offshore drilling rigs we served will be cold-stacked or scrapped. Revenue earned in 2015 from these 7795 offshore drilling rigs was ~~$11.5~~$17.5 million. Revenue earned in the recent peak year of 2014 from these 7795 offshore drilling rigs was ~~$20.0~~$26.2 million. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we have stopped providing communication services on 6480 of the 7795 offshore drilling rigs as a result of being cold-stacked or scrapped. Revenue earned in 2015 and 2014 from these 6480 offshore drilling rigs was ~~$7.2~~$11.2 million and ~~$14.8~~$19.0 million, respectively. Additionally, since ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, our strategic initiatives and other sites, which include U.S. land, have declined by 2724 and 206 sites, respectively, as a result of declining market conditions. According to The Baker Hughes Rig Count, U.S. land ~~rig count has~~rigs have declined approximately ~~77.7%~~76.1% to ~~430~~462 units in ~~late April~~July 2016 since its most recent peak of 1,931 in late November 2014. According to The Baker Hughes Rig Count, U.S. land rigs have increased approximately 14.6% since its recent low of 404 units in May 2016. It is uncertain if rig counts will recover to 2014 levels.

In addition, uncertainties that could impact our profitability include service responsiveness to remote locations, communication network complexities, political and economic instability in certain regions, export restrictions, licenses and other trade barriers. These uncertainties may result in the delay of service initiation, which may negatively impact our results of operations.

Additional uncertainties that could impact our operating cash flows include the availability and cost of satellite bandwidth, timing of collecting our receivables, and our ability to increase our contracted services through sales and marketing efforts while leveraging the contracted satellite and other communication service costs.

We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the OFAC and BIS investigation (described in this Item under the heading “Regulatory Matter”), the total costs to be incurred in completing the investigation, the potential impact on personnel, the effect of implementing any further measures that may be necessary to ensure full compliance with applicable laws or to what extent, if at all, we could be subject to fines, sanctions or other penalties.

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Revenue	$	62,341		$	77,650		$	54,911		$	75,106		$	117,252		$	152,756

Expenses:
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		36,276			43,933			33,276			39,736			69,552			83,669
Depreciation and amortization		8,243			8,096			9,013			8,211			17,256			16,307
Impairment of intangible assets								397			—			397			—
Selling and marketing		1,892			2,678			1,943			2,262			3,835			4,940
General and administrative		15,341			20,491			13,576			15,794			28,917			36,285

Total expenses		61,752			75,198			58,205			66,003			119,957			141,201

Operating income		589			2,452
Operating income (loss)								(3,294	)		9,103			(2,705	)		11,555
Other expense, net		(954	)		(1,080	)		(328	)		(348	)		(1,282	)		(1,428	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(365	)		1,372			(3,622	)		8,755			(3,987	)		10,127
Income tax expense		(902	)		(2,314	)		(1,234	)		(2,635	)		(2,136	)		(4,949	)

Net loss		(1,267	)		(942	)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		66			87
Net income (loss)								(4,856	)		6,120			(6,123	)		5,178
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests								(105	)		81			(39	)		168

Net loss attributable to RigNet, Inc. stockholders	$	(1,333	)	$	(1,029	)
Net income (loss) attributable to RigNet, Inc. stockholders							$	(4,751	)	$	6,039		$	(6,084	)	$	5,010


Other Non-GAAP Data:
Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization)	$	26,065		$	33,717		$	21,635		$	35,370		$	47,700		$	69,087
Unlevered Free Cash Flow	$	5,761		$	9,041		$	3,954		$	10,423		$	9,715		$	19,464
Adjusted EBITDA	$	10,666		$	17,114		$	8,624		$	18,506		$	19,290		$	35,620
Cash Earnings	$	9,096		$	14,289
Cash EPS	$	0.52		$	0.82


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Eastern Hemisphere:
Revenue	$	31,450	$	38,971	$	29,131	$	38,085	$	60,581	$	77,056
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		16,496		17,900		15,643		18,734		32,139		36,634

Gross Profit (non-GAAP measure)		14,954		21,071		13,488		19,351		28,442		40,422
Depreciation and amortization		4,473		3,972		4,864		3,988		9,337		7,960
Selling, general and administrative		3,076		3,528		2,911		3,664		5,987		7,192

Eastern Hemisphere operating income	$	7,405	$	13,571	$	5,713	$	11,699	$	13,118	$	25,270


Western Hemisphere:
Revenue	$	22,971	$	28,128	$	21,088	$	26,654	$	44,059	$	54,782
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		13,129		13,954		12,080		11,714		25,209		25,668

Gross Profit (non-GAAP measure)		9,842		14,174		9,008		14,940		18,850		29,114
Depreciation and amortization		2,716		3,016		2,721		2,964		5,437		5,980
Selling, general and administrative		3,170		4,554		3,286		4,326		6,456		8,880

Western Hemisphere operating income	$	3,956	$	6,604	$	3,001	$	7,650	$	6,957	$	14,254


Telecoms Systems Integration:
Revenue	$	7,920	$	10,551	$	4,692	$	10,367	$	12,612	$	20,918
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		5,276		8,073		3,594		7,715		8,870		15,788

Gross Profit (non-GAAP measure)		2,644		2,478		1,098		2,652		3,742		5,130
Depreciation and amortization		29		764		9		774		38		1,538
Selling, general and administrative		921		1,080		721		1,356		1,642		2,436

Telecom Systems Integration operating income	$	1,694	$	634	$	368	$	522	$	2,062	$	1,156

NOTE: Consolidated balances include the three segments above along with corporate activities and intercompany eliminations.

Revenue.Revenue decreased by ~~$15.3~~$20.2 million, or ~~19.7%~~26.9%, to ~~$62.3~~$54.9 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 from ~~$77.7~~$75.1 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. This decrease was driven by lower revenues ~~in the Eastern and Western Hemisphere segments and, to a lesser extent, the Telecoms Systems Integration (TSI) segment.~~across all segments. The Eastern and Western Hemisphere segments decreased ~~$7.5~~$9.0 million, or ~~19.3%~~23.5% and ~~$5.2~~$5.6 million, or ~~18.3%~~20.9%, respectively. The decrease in revenue in the Eastern and Western Hemisphere segments is primarily due to decreased offshore sites served and decreased revenue-per-site from offshore drilling rigs. The decrease of 4959 offshore drilling sites served is primarily due to offshore drilling rigs we previously served being cold-stacked or scrapped partially offset by new sales wins. The decreased revenue-per-site from offshore drilling rigs is primarily due to decreased multi-tenancy ratios from operators on offshore drilling rigs. As rigs that we serve increasingly hot-stack (when a rig is taken out of service but is ready to mobilize on short notice) due to the current economic environment, the opportunity to serve the operator and earn additional revenue is lost until the drilling rig is subsequently contracted for service. The Western Hemisphere segment, to a lesser extent, was also adversely impacted by decreased U.S. Land ~~activity.~~activity partially offset by $3.0 million of revenue from the acquisition of TECNOR. The TSI segment decreased ~~$2.6~~$5.7 million, or ~~24.9%~~54.7% due to decreased demand for TSI services. The decrease in all segments is amid a backdrop of lower oil prices, decreased oil and gas activity and reduced offshore and onshore drilling budgets.

Cost of Revenue. ~~Costs~~Cost of revenue decreased by ~~$7.7~~$6.5 million, or ~~17.4%~~16.3%, to ~~$36.3~~$33.3 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 from ~~$43.9~~$39.7 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Cost of revenue decreased in ~~all~~the Eastern Hemisphere and TSI segments primarily due to cost reduction plans coupled with decreased costs from separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend.

Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) decreased by ~~$7.7~~$13.7 million, or ~~22.7%~~38.8%, to ~~$26.1~~$21.6 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 from ~~$33.7~~$35.4 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) as a percentage of revenue, or Gross Profit Margin, decreased to ~~41.8%~~39.4% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 compared to ~~43.4%~~47.1% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. The decreased Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) and Gross Profit Margin is primarily attributable to ~~decreased revenues~~lower revenue partially offset by benefits from cost ~~reduction plans coupled with decreased costs from separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend.~~containment actions.

Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense increased by ~~$0.1~~$0.8 million to $9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 from $8.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31, 2016 from $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31,~~June 30, 2015. This increase is primarily attributable to accelerated depreciation on tenant improvements in space abandoned as part of our corporate office lease restructuring coupled with additions to property, plant and equipment and intangibles from the acquisition of TECNOR and capital expenditures.

Impairment of Intangible Assets.We recognized $0.4 million in impairment for the three months ended June 30, 2016. In June 2016, we identified a triggering event for a license in Kazakhstan associated with a decline in cash flow projections. In June 2016, we conducted an intangibles impairment test and as a result of such test, recognized a $0.4 million impairment of licenses in the Corporate segment, which was the full amount of intangibles within Kazakhstan.

Selling and Marketing.Selling and marketing expense decreased ~~$0.8~~$0.3 million to $1.9 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 from ~~$2.7~~$2.3 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 due to the effect of cost reduction plans.

General and Administrative.General and administrative expenses decreased by ~~$5.2~~$2.2 million to ~~$15.3~~$13.6 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 from ~~$20.5~~$15.8 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. General and administrative costs decreased in all segments due to cost reduction plans coupled with decreased costs from separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend partially offset by ~~CEO search~~$0.9 million of restructuring costs, ~~and~~ Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation costs and CEO search costs.

~~Excluding $1.9 million of executive departure costs, acquisition costs of $0.2 million,~~Income Tax Expense.Our effective income tax rate was -34.1% and ~~a reduction of severance costs by $0.6 million, general and administrative expenses~~30.1% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 ~~would have been $13.8 million. Excluding $4.2~~and 2015, respectively. Our effective tax rate is affected by factors including changes in valuation allowances, fluctuations in income across jurisdictions with varying tax rates, and changes in income tax reserves, including related penalties and interest.

Revenue.Revenue decreased by $35.5 million, ~~of restructuring charges, general and administrative expenses would have been $16.3~~or 23.2%, to $117.3 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 from $152.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. ~~Excluding~~This decrease was driven by lower revenues across all segments. The Eastern and Western Hemisphere segments decreased $16.5 million, or 21.4% and $10.7 million, or 19.6%, respectively. The decrease in revenue in the ~~aforementioned charges, general~~Eastern and ~~administrative costs~~Western Hemisphere segments is primarily due to decreased offshore sites served and decreased revenue-per-site from offshore drilling rigs. The decrease of 59 offshore drilling sites served is primarily due to offshore drilling rigs we previously served being cold-stacked or scrapped partially offset by new sales wins. The decreased revenue-per-site from offshore drilling rigs is primarily due to decreased multi-tenancy ratios from operators on offshore drilling rigs. As rigs that we serve increasingly hot-stack (when a rig is taken out of service but is ready to mobilize on short notice) due to the ~~effect~~current economic environment, the opportunity to serve the operator and earn additional revenue is lost until the drilling rig is subsequently contracted for service. The Western Hemisphere segment, to a lesser extent, was also adversely impacted by decreased U.S. Land activity partially offset by $5.1 million of revenue from the acquisition of TECNOR. The TSI segment decreased $8.3 million, or 39.7% due to decreased demand for TSI services. The decrease in all segments is amid a backdrop of lower oil prices, decreased oil and gas activity and reduced offshore and onshore drilling budgets.

Cost of Revenue.Cost of revenue decreased by $14.1 million, or 16.9%, to $69.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $83.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Cost of revenue decreased in all segments due to cost reduction plans coupled with decreased costs from separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend. ~~These reductions in costs were~~

Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) decreased by $21.4 million, or 31.0%, to $47.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $69.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) as a percentage of revenue, or Gross Profit Margin, decreased to 40.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to 45.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decreased Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) and Gross Profit Margin is primarily attributable to lower revenue partially offset by ~~CEO search~~benefits from cost containment actions.

Depreciation and Amortization.Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.9 million to $17.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $16.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. This increase is primarily attributable to accelerated depreciation on tenant improvements in space abandoned as part of our corporate office lease restructuring coupled with additions to property, plant and equipment and intangibles from the acquisition of TECNOR and capital expenditures.

Impairment of Intangible Assets.We recognized $0.4 million in impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2016. In June 2016, we identified a triggering event for a license in Kazakhstan associated with a decline in cash flow projections. In June 2016, we conducted an intangibles impairment test and as a result of such test, recognized a $0.4 million impairment of licenses in the Corporate segment, which was the full amount of intangibles within Kazakhstan.

Selling and Marketing.Selling and marketing expense decreased $1.1 million to $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 due to the effect of cost reduction plans.

General and Administrative.General and administrative expenses decreased by $7.4 million to $28.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $36.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. General and administrative costs decreased in all segments due to cost reduction plans coupled with decreased costs from separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend partially offset by $1.9 million of executive departure costs, Enterprise Resource Planning ERP system implementation costs and CEO search costs.

Income Tax Expense.Our effective income tax rate was -53.6% and 48.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our effective tax rate ~~for both the three months ended March 31, 2016~~is affected by factors including changes in valuation allowances, fluctuations in income across jurisdictions with varying tax rates, and ~~March 31, 2015 is not meaningful due to the restructuring~~changes in income tax reserves, including related penalties and executive departure charges recorded primarily in the US domestic operations which significantly decreased our consolidated pre-tax book income and thus increased the valuation allowance recognized in both quarters.interest.

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we had working capital, including cash, of ~~$90.7~~$87.1 million.

~~Over the past three years, annual capital expenditures have ranged from $30.2 million to $40.2 million due to sites served.~~ Based on our current expectations, we believe our liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient for the conduct of our business and operations for the foreseeable future. We may also use a portion of our available cash to finance growth through the acquisition of, or investment ~~into,~~in, businesses, products, services or technologies complementary to our current business, through mergers, acquisitions, ~~and~~ joint ventures or ~~otherwise.~~otherwise, or to pay down outstanding debt.

During the next twelve months, we expect our principal sources of liquidity to be cash flows from operating activities, cash and cash equivalents and availability under our credit facility. In forecasting our cash flows we have considered factors including contracted services related to long-term deepwater drilling programs, U.S. land rig count trends, projected oil and natural gas prices, and contracted and available satellite bandwidth.

While we believe we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet our current operating requirements and expansion plans, we may elect to pursue additional expansion opportunities within the next year which could require additional financing, either debt or equity.

Beyond the next twelve months, we expect our principal sources of liquidity to be cash flows provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents on hand, availability under our credit facility and additional financing activities we may pursue, which may include debt or equity offerings.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1,	$	60,468		$	66,576		$	60,468		$	66,576
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,890			5,822			18,440			13,435
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,361	)		(8,056	)		(15,343	)		(13,891	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,363	)		(2,213	)		(3,859	)		(4,295	)
Changes in foreign currency translation		345			(1,340	)		(250	)		(301	)

Cash and cash equivalents, March 31,	$	51,979		$	60,789
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30,							$	59,456		$	61,524

Currently, ~~the Australian dollar,~~ the Norwegian kroner, ~~and~~ the British pound sterling and the Australian dollar are the foreign currencies that could materially impact our liquidity. ~~Our historical experience with exchange rates for these currencies has been relatively stable and, consequently, we~~We presently do not ~~typically~~ hedge these risks, but evaluate ~~these risks~~financial risk on a ~~continual~~regular basis and may ~~put~~utilize financial instruments ~~in place~~ in the future if deemed necessary. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~84.1%~~84.0% and ~~85.4%~~85.8% of our revenue was denominated in U.S. dollars, respectively.

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$1.9~~$18.4 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 compared to ~~$5.8~~$13.4 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash provided by operating activities during 2016 of ~~$3.9~~$5.0 million was primarily due to ~~lower operating income coupled with~~ the timing of collection of our accounts receivable partially offset by ~~the timing of payments of our accounts payable.~~lower operating income (loss).

Our cash provided by operations is subject to many variables, the most significant of which is the volatility of the oil and gas industry and, therefore, the demand for our services. Other factors impacting operating cash flows include the availability and cost of satellite bandwidth, as well as the timing of collecting our receivables. Our future cash flow from operations will depend on our ability to increase our contracted services through our sales and marketing efforts while leveraging the contracted satellite and other communication service costs.

Net cash used in investing activities was ~~$8.4~~$15.3 million and ~~$8.1~~$13.9 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Net Cash used in investing activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 include $4.8 million paid in connection with the acquisition of TECNOR. Net cash used in investing activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 includes capital expenditures of ~~$4.1~~$9.4 million and ~~$8.2~~$14.3 million, respectively. We expect capital expenditures for 2016 to be lower than the previous year due to declining global oil and gas drilling activity. We believe our 2016 capital expenditures will primarily be focused on growth opportunities arising from new build high specification deepwater drilling ~~rigs and, to a lesser extent, our ERP system.~~rigs.

Net cash used in financing activities was ~~$2.4~~$3.9 million ~~compared to cash used financing activities of $2.2~~and $4.3 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Cash used in financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 include ~~$2.1 million and $2.2~~$4.3 million in principal payments on our long-term ~~debt, respectively.~~debt.

The Company has a $60.0 million term loan (Term Loan) and a $125.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a $15 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit.

The Term Loan bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.5% to 2.5%, based on a ratio of funded debt to ~~Adjusted~~Consolidated EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure defined in the credit agreement. Interest is payable monthly along with quarterly principal installments of $2.1 million, with the balance due October 2018. The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 was ~~2.2%~~2.4% and 2.0%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended

June 30, 2016 and 2015 was 2.3% and 2.0%, respectively, with an interest rate of ~~2.2%~~2.5% at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The Term Loan is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the outstanding principal balance of the Term Loan was ~~$40.7~~$38.6 million.

The revolving credit facility matures in October 2018 with any outstanding borrowings then payable. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.5% to 2.5%, which varies as a function of the Company’s leverage ratio. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, $35.0 million in draws have been made on the facility and remain outstanding. The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 was ~~2.2%~~2.3% and 2.0%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was 2.3% and 1.9%, respectively, with an interest rate of ~~2.2%~~2.5% at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

In February 2016, we amended our credit agreement with the most significant changes being the definition of ~~consolidated~~Consolidated EBITDA, the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio and the timing associated with delivery of financial statements and compliance certificates to the administrative agent.

Our credit agreement imposes certain restrictions including limitations on our ability to obtain additional debt financing and on our payment of cash dividends. It also requires us to maintain certain financial covenants such as a funded debt to ~~Adjusted~~Consolidated EBITDA ratio of less than or equal to 2.5 to 1.0 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we believe we were in compliance with all covenants.

In 2013, our internal compliance program detected potential violations of U.S. sanctions by one of our foreign subsidiaries in connection with certain of our customers’ rigs that were moved into the territorial waters of countries sanctioned by the United States. We estimate that we received total revenue of approximately $0.1 million during the period related to the potential violations. These countries are subject to a number of economic regulations, including sanctions administered by OFAC, and comprehensive restrictions on the export and re-export of U.S.-origin items to these countries administered by BIS. Our customers that are not based in the U.S. are not subject to the same restrictions on operating in these countries as we are, but we are prohibited from providing services or facilitating the provision of services to their rigs in transit to or while operating in a sanctioned country.

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to sanctions and export restrictions may subject us to criminal sanctions and civil remedies, including fines, denial of export privileges, injunctions or seizures of our assets. We have voluntarily self-reported the potential violations to OFAC and BIS and retained outside counsel who conducted an investigation of the matter and submitted a report to OFAC and BIS. We continue to cooperate with these agencies with respect to resolution of the matter.

We incurred legal expenses of $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to this investigation. We may continue to incur significant legal fees and related expenses, and the investigations may involve management time in the future in order to cooperate with OFAC and BIS. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the investigation, the total costs to be incurred in completing the investigation, the potential impact on personnel, the effect of implementing any further measures that may be necessary to ensure full compliance with applicable laws or to what extent, if at all, we could be subject to fines, sanctions or other penalties.

The non-GAAP financial measures, Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization), Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash Flow ~~Cash Earnings and Cash EPS~~ may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies because other companies may not calculate Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization), Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash Flow ~~Cash Earnings and Cash EPS~~ or similarly titled measures in the same manner we do. Therefore, these non-GAAP measures should be considered in conjunction with net ~~loss~~income (loss) and other performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, such as gross profit, operating income or net cash provided by operating activities. Further, Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization), Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash Flow ~~Cash Earnings and Cash EPS~~ should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP measures such as net ~~loss,~~income (loss), gross profit, operating income or any other GAAP measure of liquidity or financial performance. We prepare Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization), Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash Flow ~~Cash Earnings and Cash EPS~~ to eliminate the impact of items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance. We encourage you to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our gross profit under GAAP to Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization).


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Gross profit	$	18,300	$	25,978	$	13,476	$	27,508	$	31,776	$	53,486
Depreciation and amortization related to cost of revenue		7,765		7,739		8,159		7,862		15,924		15,601

Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization)	$	26,065	$	33,717	$	21,635	$	35,370	$	47,700	$	69,087

GAAP defines gross profit as revenue less cost of revenue, and includes in cost of revenue depreciation and amortization expenses related to revenue-generating long-lived and intangible assets. We define Gross Profit (excluding depreciation and amortization) as revenue less cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization). This measure differs from the GAAP definition of gross profit as we do not include the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses related to revenue-generating long-lived and intangible assets which represent non-cash expenses. We believe this measure is useful to investors because management uses it to evaluate operating margins and the effectiveness of cost management.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net ~~loss~~income (loss) plus interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment of goodwill, intangibles, property, plant and equipment, foreign exchange impact of intercompany financing activities, (gain) loss on retirement of property, plant and equipment, change in fair value of derivatives, stock-based compensation, merger/acquisition costs, ~~and related bonuses,~~ executive departure costs, restructuring charges and non-recurring items. ~~Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP.~~

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:

Although Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

We define Unlevered Free Cash Flow as Adjusted EBITDA less capital expenditures. We believe Unlevered Free Cash Flow is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:

Although Unlevered Free Cash Flow is frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, Unlevered Free Cash Flow has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

We define Cash Earnings as net loss plus depreciation and amortization, impairment of goodwill, intangibles, property, plant and equipment, foreign exchange impact of intercompany financing activities, (gain) loss on retirement of property and equipment, change in fair value of derivatives, stock-based compensation, merger/acquisition costs and related bonuses, executive departure costs, restructuring charges and non-recurring items. We define Cash EPS as Cash Earnings divided by diluted shares. Cash Earnings and Cash EPS are financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with GAAP.

~~We believe Cash Earnings and Cash EPS are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:~~

Although Cash Earnings and Cash EPS are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, Cash Earnings and Cash EPS have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

The following table presents a reconciliation of our net ~~loss~~income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash ~~Flow, Cash Earnings and Cash EPS.~~Flow.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Net loss	$	(1,267	)	$	(942	)
Net income (loss)							$	(4,856	)	$	6,120		$	(6,123	)	$	5,178
Interest expense		668			511			643			508			1,311			1,019
Depreciation and amortization		8,243			8,096			9,013			8,211			17,256			16,307
Impairment of intangible assets								397			—			397			—
Gain on sales of property, plant and equipment, net of retirements		(16	)		(12	)		(134	)		(1	)		(150	)		(13	)
Stock-based compensation		714			949			1,128			1,033			1,842			1,982
Restructuring		(632	)		6,198			1,129			—			497			6,198
Executive departure costs		1,884			—			—			—			1,884			—
Acquisition costs		170			—			70			—			240			—
Income tax expense		902			2,314			1,234			2,635			2,136			4,949

Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP measure)	$	10,666		$	17,114		$	8,624		$	18,506		$	19,290		$	35,620

Interest expense		(668	)		(511	)
Income tax expense		(902	)		(2,314	)

Cash Earnings (non-GAAP measure)	$	9,096		$	14,289

Diluted Shares		17,613			17,463

Cash EPS (non-GAAP measure)	$	0.52		$	0.82


Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP measure)	$	10,666		$	17,114		$	8,624		$	18,506		$	19,290		$	35,620
Capital expenditures		4,905			8,073			4,670			8,083			9,575			16,156

Unlevered Free Cash Flow (non-GAAP measure)	$	5,761		$	9,041		$	3,954		$	10,423		$	9,715		$	19,464

We evaluate Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash Flow ~~Cash Earnings and Cash EPS~~ generated from our operations and operating segments to assess the potential recovery of historical capital expenditures, determine timing and investment levels for growth opportunities, extend commitments of satellite bandwidth cost to expand our offshore production platform and vessel market share, invest in new products and services, expand or open new offices, service centers and SOIL nodes, and assist purchasing synergies.

Adjusted EBITDA decreased by ~~$6.4~~$9.9 million to ~~$10.7~~$8.6 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, from ~~$17.1~~$18.5 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $16.3 million to $19.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $35.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The ~~decrease~~decreases resulted primarily from ~~decreased~~lower revenue partially offset by cost ~~savings from the cost reduction plans and separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend.~~containment actions.

Unlevered Free Cash Flow was ~~$5.8~~$4.0 million in the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, a decrease of ~~$3.3~~$6.5 million over the prior year quarter. Unlevered Free Cash Flow was $9.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of $9.7 million over the prior year period. The ~~decrease~~decreases in Unlevered Free Cash Flow ~~during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was~~were due to decreased Adjusted EBITDA partially offset by a decline in capital expenditures.

Cash Earnings decreased by $5.2 million to $9.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, from $14.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease resulted from decreased revenue partially offset by cost reduction plans coupled with decreased costs from separate cost savings initiatives focused on reducing third party spend.

We are subject to a variety of risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations relating to foreign operations and certain purchases from foreign vendors. In the normal course of business, we assess these risks and have established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency values.

Our objective in managing our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is to reduce the impact of adverse fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with foreign currency exchange rates. We presently do not ~~currently use foreign currency forward contracts to~~ hedge ~~our exposure on firm commitments denominated in foreign currencies,~~these risks, but evaluate ~~this~~financial risk on a ~~continual~~regular basis and may ~~put~~utilize financial instruments ~~in place~~ in the future if deemed necessary. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~15.9%~~16.0% and ~~14.6%~~14.2%, respectively of our revenues were earned in non-U.S. currencies. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, we had no significant outstanding foreign exchange contracts.

Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable interest rate long-term debt. We presently do not ~~currently use financial instruments to~~ hedge these ~~interest rate risk exposures,~~risks, but evaluate ~~this~~financial risk on a ~~continual~~regular basis and may ~~put~~utilize financial instruments ~~in place~~ in the future if deemed necessary. The following analysis reflects the annual impacts of potential changes in our interest rate to net ~~loss~~income (loss) attributable to us and our total stockholders’ equity based on our outstanding long-term debt on ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, assuming those liabilities were outstanding for the previous twelve months:


	March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
	(in thousands)
Effect on Net Income and Equity - Increase/Decrease:
Effect on Net Income (Loss) and Equity - Increase/Decrease:					(in thousands)
1% Decrease/increase in rate	$	755	$	777	$	734	$	777
2% Decrease/increase in rate	$	1,509	$	1,553	$	1,467	$	1,553
3% Decrease/increase in rate	$	2,264	$	2,330	$	2,201	$	2,330

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Except as discussed below, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We are in the process of implementing an ERP system, SAP (B1), as part of a multi-year plan to integrate and upgrade our systems and processes. We substantially completed the migration of our Western Hemisphere ~~(excluding Brazil)~~ and Corporate segments to SAP during 2015, and we are currently in the process of executing the migration of our remaining segments to SAP, which is expected to be completed during the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

As the phased implementation of this system occurs, we are experiencing certain changes to our processes and procedures which, in turn, result in changes to our internal control over financial reporting. While we expect SAP to strengthen our internal financial controls by automating certain manual processes and standardizing business processes and reporting across our organization, management will continue to evaluate and monitor our internal controls as processes and procedures in each of the affected areas evolve. For a discussion of risks related to the implementation of new systems, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any legal proceeding the ultimate outcome of which, in our judgment based on information currently available, would have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The exhibits required to be filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.


101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	~~Three Months Ended March 31,~~
	~~2015~~
~~Expected volatility~~		44	%
~~Expected term (in years)~~		7
~~Risk-free interest rate~~		~~1.9~~	%
~~Dividend yield~~		—


2.1		Share Purchase Agreement between RigNet, Inc. and the shareholders of Nessco Group Holdings Ltd. dated July 5, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 5, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference)

2.2		Share Purchase Agreement between RigNet, Inc. and the shareholders of Orgtec S.A.P.I. de C.V., d.b.a. TECNOR dated November 3, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 9, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, ~~(filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 [File No. 333-169723],~~ as amended ~~and incorporated herein by reference)~~

3.2		Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, effective May 18, 2016.

3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended as

3.4		Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of ~~October 31, 2013~~RigNet, Inc., effective May 18, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on ~~November 6, 2013,~~May 24, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.1+		Amendment to Employment Letter of Mr. Charles “Chip” Schneider and RigNet, Inc. dated April 20, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 25, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.2+		Performance Unit Award Agreement by and between RigNet, Inc. and Marty Jimmerson, effective January 1, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 10, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.3+		Amendment to the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 [File No. 333-211471], as amended, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.4+		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the RigNet, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.5+		Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement under the RigNet, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.6+		Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under the RigNet, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.7+		Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the RigNet, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.8+		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the RigNet, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

10.9+		Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Steven E. Pickett dated May 31, 2016

10.10		Notice of Early Termination of Lease Agreement dated June 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 15, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference)

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


		RIGNET, INC.

Date: ~~May 9,~~August 8, 2016	By:	/s/ CHARLES E. SCHNEIDER
		Charles E. Schneider
		Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Eastern Hemisphere		Western Hemisphere		Telecoms Systems Integration		Corporate and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
	(in thousands)
Revenue	$	31,450	$	22,971	$	7,920	$	—		$	62,341
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		16,496		13,129		5,276		1,375			36,276
Depreciation and amortization		4,473		2,716		29		1,025			8,243
Selling, general and administrative		3,076		3,170		921		10,066			17,233

Operating income (loss)	$	7,405	$	3,956	$	1,694	$	(12,466	)	$	589


Total assets		131,784		102,623		25,313		4,506			264,226
Capital expenditures		3,891		518		—		496			4,905

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
	Eastern Hemisphere		Western Hemisphere		Telecoms Systems Integration		Corporate and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
	(in thousands)
Revenue	$	38,971	$	28,128	$	10,551	$	—		$	77,650
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		17,900		13,954		8,073		4,006			43,933
Depreciation and amortization		3,972		3,016		764		344			8,096
Selling, general and administrative		3,528		4,554		1,080		14,007			23,169

Operating income (loss)	$	13,571	$	6,604	$	634	$	(18,357	)	$	2,452


Total assets		150,074		133,008		45,704		(41,328	)		287,458
Capital expenditures		4,021		2,124		—		1,928			8,073


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Eastern Hemisphere		Western Hemisphere		Telecoms Systems Integration		Corporate and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
	(in thousands)
Revenue	$	29,131	$	21,088	$	4,692	$	—		$	54,911
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		15,643		12,080		3,594		1,959			33,276
Depreciation and amortization		4,864		2,721		9		1,419			9,013
Impairment of intangible assets		—		—		—		397			397
Selling, general and administrative		2,911		3,286		721		8,601			15,519

Operating income (loss)	$	5,713	$	3,001	$	368	$	(12,376	)	$	(3,294	)


Capital expenditures		3,321		699		—		650			4,670

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Eastern Hemisphere		Western Hemisphere		Telecoms Systems Integration		Corporate and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
	(in thousands)
Revenue	$	38,085	$	26,654	$	10,367	$	—		$	75,106
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		18,734		11,714		7,715		1,573			39,736
Depreciation and amortization		3,988		2,964		774		485			8,211
Selling, general and administrative		3,664		4,326		1,356		8,710			18,056

Operating income (loss)	$	11,699	$	7,650	$	522	$	(10,768	)	$	9,103


Capital expenditures		3,681		2,915		166		1,321			8,083

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Eastern Hemisphere		Western Hemisphere		Telecoms Systems Integration		Corporate and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
	(in thousands)
Revenue	$	60,581	$	44,059	$	12,612	$	—		$	117,252
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		32,139		25,209		8,870		3,334			69,552
Depreciation and amortization		9,337		5,437		38		2,444			17,256
Impairment of intangible assets		—		—		—		397			397
Selling, general and administrative		5,987		6,456		1,642		18,667			32,752

Operating income (loss)	$	13,118	$	6,957	$	2,062	$	(24,842	)	$	(2,705	)


Total assets		122,080		93,993		29,539		3,209			248,821
Capital expenditures		7,212		1,217		—		1,146			9,575

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Eastern Hemisphere		Western Hemisphere		Telecoms Systems Integration		Corporate and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
	(in thousands)
Revenue	$	77,056	$	54,782	$	20,918	$	—		$	152,756
Cost of revenue (excluding depreciation and amortization)		36,634		25,668		15,788		5,579			83,669
Depreciation and amortization		7,960		5,980		1,538		829			16,307
Selling, general and administrative		7,192		8,880		2,436		22,717			41,225

Operating income (loss)	$	25,270	$	14,254	$	1,156	$	(29,125	)	$	11,555


Total assets		153,033		138,833		45,434		(42,798	)		294,502
Capital expenditures		7,702		5,039		166		3,249			16,156

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company