UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form10-Q

for the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019

or

for the transition period from    

333-201017001-38627

(Commission File Number)

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(717)957-2196

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (oror for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 9,026,3959,167,700 at OctoberJuly 30, 2017.2019.

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM10-Q

For the Quarter Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Riverview Financial Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Nature of Operations

Riverview Financial Corporation, (the “Company” or “Riverview”), a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania, provides a full range of financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riverview Bank (the “Bank”). The Company services its retail and commercial customers through 17 community banking

Riverview Bank, with 30 full service offices and three limited purpose offices, located withinis a full service commercial bank offering a wide range of traditional banking services and financial advisory, insurance and investment services to individuals, municipalities andsmall-to-medium sized businesses in the Pennsylvania market areas of Berks, Blaire, Centre, Clearfield, Cumberland, Dauphin, Huntingdon, Lebanon, Lehigh, Lycoming, Northumberland, Perry, Schuylkill and Somerset Counties in Pennsylvania.

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP’) for interim financial information and with the instructions toForm10-Q and Article 8 ofRegulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform towith the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have any effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The operating results and financial position of the Company for the three and ninesix months ended and as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial position that may be expected in the future. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 20162018 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Accordingly, these unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 20162018 Annual Report onForm10-K, filed on March 29, 2017.14, 2019.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. SignificantThese estimates that are particularly susceptible to material changeand assumptions affect the amounts reported in the near term relate tofinancial statements and the determination of the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial instruments, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities and impairment of goodwill.disclosures provided. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Standards

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The amendments Adopted in ASU2016-01, among other things: require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; require separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU2016-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting guidance to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements, and expects the fair values of financial instruments disclosed in the footnotes to conform to a market participant’s view for measurement and disclosure purposes.2019

In February 2016, the FASB issued an update ASUNo. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. Among other things,“Leases”, which requires lessees to record most leases on their balance sheet and recognize leasing expenses in the amendments in ASU2016-02, lesseesincome statement. Operating leases, except for short-term leases that are subject to an accounting policy election, will be required to recognizerecorded on the followingbalance sheet for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date:lessees by establishing a lease liability which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and acorrespondingright-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s rightasset. All entities are required to use or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at,that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. TheAs the Company elected the transition option provided in ASUNo. 2018-11, the modified retrospective approach would not require any

transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach.was applied on January 1, 2019 (as opposed to January 1, 2017). The Company is currently assessingdid not elect the impact that ASUhindsight practical expedient, which allows entities to use hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of2016-02right-of-use will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-07, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting”.assets. The amendmentsguidance in this ASU eliminatebecame effective January 1, 2019 at which time the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on astep-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. In addition, the amendments in this ASU require that an entity that has anavailable-for-sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The amendments were effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the adoption of the equity method. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASUNo. 2016-07 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Shares-Based Payment Accounting”. The amendments in this ASU simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including: income tax consequences; classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and classificationCompany recorded on the statementConsolidated Balance Sheet aright-of-use asset and lease liability of cash flows. The amendments were effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASUNo. 2016-09 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB ASUNo. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU2016-13 requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. ASU2016-13 also requires new disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost, loans andavailable-for-sale debt securities. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We have dedicated staff and resources in place evaluating the Company’s options including evaluating the appropriate model options and collecting and reviewing loan data for use in these models. The Company is currently still assessing the impact that this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This new accounting guidance will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting guidance to have a material effect on the statement of cash flow.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers”.ASU 2016-20 updates the new revenue standard by clarifying issues that have arisen fromASU 2014-09, but does not change the core principle of the new standard. The issues addressed in this ASU include: (i) Loan guarantee fees; (ii) Impairment testing of contract costs; (iii) Interaction of impairment testing with guidance in other topics; (iv) Provisions for losses on construction-type and production-type contracts; (v) Scope of Topic 606; (vi) Disclosure of remaining performance obligations; (vii) Disclosure of prior-period performance obligations; (viii) Contract modifications; (ix) Contract asset vs. receivable; (x) Refund liability; (xi) Advertising costs; (xii) Fixed-odds wagering contracts in the casino industry; and (xiii) Cost capitalization for advisors to private funds and public funds. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this new guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Our revenue is comprised of net interest income on financial assets and financial liabilities, which is explicitly excluded from the scope ofASU 2014-09, andnon-interest income.ASU 2016-20 and2014-09 could require us to change how we recognize certain revenue streams withinnon-interest income, however, we do not expect these changes to have a significant impact on our financial statements. We continue to evaluate the impact ofASU 2016-20 and2014-09 on our Company and expect to adopt the standard in the first quarter of 2018 with a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings, if such adjustment is deemed to be significant.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”. The ASU clarifies the definition of a business to assist with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-03, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the 2015 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 EITF Meetings”. The ASU adds an SEC paragraph to ASUs2014-09,2016-02 and2016-13 which specifies the SEC staff view that a registrant should evaluate ASUs that have not yet been adopted to determine the appropriate disclosure about the potential material effects of those ASUs on the financial statements when adopted. The guidance also specifies the SEC staff view on financial statement disclosures when the company does not know or cannot reasonably estimate the impact that adoption of the ASUs will have on the financial statements. The ASU also conforms to SEC guidance on accounting for tax benefits resulting from investments in affordable housing projects to the guidance in ASU2014-01, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). The amendments in this update are effective upon issuance. The guidance did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The Company should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The impairment charge is limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”. The amendments clarify that a financial asset is within the scope of Topic 610 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments also define the term in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments clarify that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Topic 610 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty.$3,719. For example, a parent may transfer control of nonfinancial assets by transferring ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary. A contract that includes the transfer of ownership interests in one or more consolidated subsidiaries is within the scope of Topic 610 if substantially all of the fair value of the assets that are promised to the counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets. The amendments clarify that an entity should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein. Entities may use either a full or modified approach to adopt the ASU. The Company is assessing ASU2017-05 and does not expect it to have a material impact on its accounting and disclosures.further detail, see Note 7 – Leases.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)”, which requires employers that offer or maintain defined benefit plans to disaggregate the service component from the other components of net benefit cost and provides guidance on presentation of the service component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-08, “Receivables - “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Topic 310), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”. These amendments shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis, with a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is assessing the impactadoption of ASUNo. 2017-08 on its accounting and disclosures.January 1, 2019, did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

7

In MayAugust 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”. This ASU clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting

conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interims periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.”Activities”. The amendments in the Update better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities,The adoption of ASUNo. 2017-12 on January 1. 2019, did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU2016-13 requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. ASU2016-13 also requires new disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost, loans andavailable-for-sale debt securities. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.2018-19—Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses. The amendments clarify that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of Subtopic326-20. Instead, impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with Topic 842, Leases. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU2019-05 “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)-Targeted Transition Relief” which amends ASU2016-13 to allow companies to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU2016-13, the fair value option on financial instruments that were previously recorded at amortized cost and are within the scope of ASC326-20 if the instruments are eligible for the fair value option under ASC825-10. The fair value option election does not apply toheld-to-maturity debt securities. Entities are required to make this election on aninstrument-by-instrument basis. In December 2018, the federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that modifies their regulatory capital rules and provides institutions the option to phase in over a three-year period anyday-one regulatory capital effects of the new accounting standard. The Company has formed an internal management committee and engaged a third party vendor to assist with the transition to the guidance set forth in this update. The committee is currently evaluating the impact of this update on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, but the ALLL is expected to increase upon adoption since the allowance will be required to cover the full expected life of the portfolio. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated and will depend on economic conditions and the composition of the loan and lease portfolio at the time of adoption. Management is currently evaluating the preliminary modeling results, including a qualitative framework to account for the drivers of credit losses that are not captured by the quantitative model. In July 2019, the FASB tentatively decided to delay the effective date for small reporting public companies to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company currently expects as of January 1, 2023 to recognize aone-time cumulative effect adjustment to increase the ALLL with an offsetting reduction to the retained earnings component of equity. The effective date is subject to final approval by FASB.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This new accounting guidance will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting guidance to have a material effect on the statement of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The Company should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The impairment charge is limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, andincluding interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The amendments in this Update improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures by modifying the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The ASU is effective for all entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020.2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. In addition, an entity may early adopt any of the removed or modified disclosures immediately and delay adoption of the new disclosures until the effective date. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

8

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General(Subtopic 715-20)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”.Subtopic 715-20 addresses the disclosure of other accounting and reporting requirements related to single-employer defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans. The amendments in this Update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost-beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. Although narrow in scope, the amendments are considered an important part of the Board’s efforts to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by applying concepts in the FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements. The amendments in this Update apply to all employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The ASU is effective for all entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract.” This guidance aligns the accounting for implementation costs related to a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the guidance on capitalizing costs associated with developing or obtaininginternal-use software. Common examples of hosting arrangements include software as a service, platform or infrastructure as a service and other similar types of hosting arrangements. While capitalized costs related tointernal-use software is generally considered an intangible asset, costs incurred to implement a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract would typically be characterized in the company’s financial statements in the same manner as other service costs (e.g., prepaid expense). The new guidance provides that an entity would be required to amortize capitalized implementation costs over the term of the hosting arrangement on a straight-line basis unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the pattern in which the entity expects to benefit from access to the hosted software. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with earlier adoption permitted in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

2. Other comprehensive income (loss):

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and their related tax effects are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets relates to net unrealized gains and losses on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale and benefit plan adjustments.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders’ equity at SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 is as follows: