UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDERPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarter Ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019

Commission File Number1-8858

UNITIL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

New Hampshire 02-0381573

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

6 Liberty Lane West, Hampton, New Hampshire 03842-1720
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (603)772-0775

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   Accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated filer   Smaller reporting company 
   Emerging growth company 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

 

Outstanding at OctoberApril 22, 20182019

Common Stock, Nono par value 14,872,95514,916,405 Shares


UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

FORM10-Q

For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019

Table of Contents

 

   Page No.

Part I. Financial Information

  

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements - Unaudited(Unaudited)

  
 

Consolidated Statements of Earnings - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017

  2119
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets, September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 20172018

  22-2320-21
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - NineThree Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017

  2422
 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Stock Equity - Three Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017

  25

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Stock Equity – Nine Months Ended September  30, 2018 and 2017

2623
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  27-5524-49

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  4-204-18

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  5550

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

  5550

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

  5650

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  5650

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

  5650

Item 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

  Inapplicable

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

  Inapplicable

Item 5.

 

Other Information

  5751

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

  5752
Signatures   6053


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This report and the documents incorporated by reference into this report contain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included or incorporated by reference into this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding the financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for the Company’s future operations, are forward-looking statements.

These statements include declarations regarding the Company’s beliefs and current expectations. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties include those described in Item 1A (Risk Factors) and the following:

 

the Company’s regulatory environment (including regulations relating to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental matters), which could affect the rates the Company is able to charge, the Company’s authorized rate of return and the Company’s ability to recover costs in its rates;

 

fluctuations in the supply of, demand for, and the prices of energy commodities and transmission capacity and the Company’s ability to recover energy commodity costs in its rates;

 

customers’ preferred energy sources;

 

severe storms and the Company’s ability to recover storm costs in its rates;

 

the potential for disruption to the Company’s operations due to cyber-attacks, computer viruses, human errors, acts of war or terrorism or other reasons;

the Company’s stranded electric generation and generation-related supply costs and the Company’s ability to recover stranded costs in its rates;

 

declines in the valuation of capital markets, which could require the Company to make substantial cash contributions to cover its pension obligations, and the Company’s ability to recover pension obligation costs in its rates;

 

general economic conditions, which could adversely affect (i) the Company’s customers and, consequently, the demand for the Company’s distribution services, (ii) the availability of credit and liquidity resources and (iii) certain of the Company’s counterparties’ obligations (including those of its insurers and lenders);

 

the Company’s ability to obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms;

 

increases in interest rates, which could increase the Company’s interest expense;

 

restrictive covenants contained in the terms of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ indebtedness, which restrict certain aspects of the Company’s business operations;

 

variations in weather, which could decrease demand for the Company’s distribution services;

long-term global climate change, which could adversely affect customer demand or cause extreme weather events that could disrupt the Company’s electric and natural gas distribution services;

 

numerous hazards and operating risks relating to the Company’s electric and natural gas distribution activities, which could result in accidents and other operating risks and costs;

 

catastrophic events;

 

the Company’s ability to retain its existing customers and attract new customers;

the Company’s energy brokering customers’ performance under multi-year energy brokering contracts; and

 

increased competition.

Many of these risks are beyond the Company’s control. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company to predict all of these factors, nor can the Company assess the impact of any such factor on its business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)

OVERVIEW

Unitil Corporation (Unitil or the Company) is a public utility holding company headquartered in Hampton, New Hampshire. Unitil is subject to regulation as a holding company system by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Unitil’s principal business is the local distribution of electricity and natural gas throughout its service areasterritory in the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine. Unitil is the parent company of three wholly-owned distribution utilities:

 

 i)

Unitil Energy Systems, Inc. (Unitil Energy), which provides electric service in the southeastern seacoast and state capital regions of New Hampshire, including the capital city of Concord, New Hampshire;Concord;

 

 ii)

Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company (Fitchburg), which provides both electric and natural gas service in the greater Fitchburg area of north central Massachusetts; and

 

 iii)

Northern Utilities, Inc. (Northern Utilities), which provides natural gas service in southeastern New Hampshire and portions of southern and central Maine, including the city of Portland, which is the largest city in northern New England.

Unitil Energy, Fitchburg and Northern Utilities are collectively referred to as the “distribution utilities.” Together, the distribution utilities serve approximately 105,000105,600 electric customers and 81,30082,700 natural gas customers in their service territory.

In addition, Unitil is the parent company of Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc. (Granite State), an interstate natural gas transmission pipeline company, operating 86 miles of underground gas transmission pipeline primarily located in Maine and New Hampshire. Granite State provides Northern Utilities with interconnection to major natural gas pipelines and access to domestic natural gas supplies in the south and Canadian natural gas supplies in the north.

Unitil had an investment in Net Utility Plant of $1,022.3$1,037.8 million at September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. Unitil’s total operating revenue includes revenue to recover the approved cost of purchased electricity and natural gas in rates on a fully reconciling basis. As a result of this reconciling rate structure, the Company’s earnings are not directly affected by changes in the cost of purchased electricity and natural gas. Earnings from Unitil’s utility operations are primarily derived from the return on investment in the utility assets of the three distribution utilities and Granite State.

Unitil also conductsResources is the Company’s wholly-ownednon-regulated operations principally throughsubsidiary. Usource, Inc. and Usource L.L.C. (collectively, Usource), which isthe Company divested of in the first quarter of 2019, were wholly-owned bysubsidiaries of Unitil Resources Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Unitil.Resources. Usource provides energyprovided brokering and advisory services to large commercial and industrial

customers primarily in the northeastern United States. See additional discussion of the divestiture of Usource in “Divestiture ofNon-Regulated Business Subsidiary” in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company’s other subsidiaries include Unitil Service Corp., which provides, at cost, a variety of administrative and professional services to Unitil’s affiliated companies, Unitil Realty Corp. (Unitil Realty), which owns and manages Unitil’s corporate office building and property located in Hampton, New Hampshire and Unitil Power Corp., which formerly functioned as the full requirements wholesale power supply provider for Unitil Energy. Unitil’s consolidated net income includes the earnings of the holding company and these subsidiaries.

RATES AND REGULATION

Regulation

Unitil is subject to comprehensive regulation by federal and state regulatory authorities. Unitil and its subsidiaries are subject to regulation as a holding company system by the FERC under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 with regard to certain bookkeeping, accounting and reporting requirements. Unitil’s utility operations related to wholesale and interstate energy business activities are also regulated by the FERC. Unitil’s distribution utilities are subject to regulation by the applicable state public utility commissions, with regard to their rates, issuance of securities and other accounting and operational matters: Unitil Energy is subject to regulation by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC); Fitchburg is subject to regulation by the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (MDPU); and Northern Utilities is regulated by the NHPUC and the Maine Public Utilities Commission (MPUC). Granite State, Unitil’s interstate natural gas transmission pipeline, is subject to regulation by the FERC with regard to its rates and operations. Because Unitil’s primary operations are subject to rate regulation, the regulatory treatment of various matters could significantly affect the Company’s operations and financial position.

Unitil’s distribution utilities deliver electricity and/or natural gas to all customers in their service territory, at rates established under cost of service regulation. Under this regulatory structure, Unitil’s distribution utilities recover the cost of providing distribution service to their customers based on a historical test year, and earn a return on their capital investment in utility assets. In addition, the Company’s distribution utilities and its natural gas transmission pipeline company may also recover certain base rate costs, including capital project spending and enhanced reliability and vegetation management programs, through annual step adjustments and cost tracker rate mechanisms.

Fitchburg is subject to revenue decoupling. Revenue decoupling is the term given to the elimination of the dependency of a utility’s distribution revenue on the volume of electricity or natural gas sales. The difference between distribution revenue amounts billed to customers and the targeted revenue decoupling amounts is recognized as an increase or a decrease in Accrued Revenue which forms the basis for resetting rates for future cash recoveries from, or credits to, customers. These revenue decoupling targets may be adjusted as a result of rate cases and other authorized adjustments that the Company files with the MDPU. The Company estimates that revenue decoupling applies to approximately 27% and 11% of Unitil’s total annual electric and natural gas sales volumes, respectively.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) was signed into law. Among other things, the TCJA substantially reduced the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. Each state public utility commission, with jurisdiction over the areas that are served by Unitil’s electric and gas subsidiary companies, has issued procedural orders directing how the tax law changes arewere to be reflected in rates, including requiring that the companies provide certain filings and calculations.rates. Unitil has complied with these orders and has made the required changes to its rates as directed by the commissions. The FERC has also opened a rulemaking proceeding on this matter which has been addressed in a rate settlement filing by Granite State (described below).State. More recently, on November 15, 2018, the FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and a Policy Statement to address the TCJA’s effects on the Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (ADIT) on transmission rates. Under the proposed rules all public utilities with transmission formula rates, including Fitchburg, would be required to: (1) include mechanisms to deduct any excess ADIT from or add any deficient ADIT to their rate bases; (2) include mechanisms in those rates that would raise or lower their income tax allowances by any amortized excess or deficient ADIT; and (3) incorporate a new permanent worksheet into their rates that will annually track information related to excess or deficient ADIT. The Company believes that these matters are substantially resolved and will not have a material impact on its financial position, operating results, or cash flows.

In Maine, Northern Utilities’ Maine division recently completed a base rate case (described below). The MPUC’s final order in that docket incorporated the lower tax rates in the calculation of rates for the Company.

Similarly, in New Hampshire, Northern Utilities’ New Hampshire division recently completed a base rate case proceeding (described below). The NHPUC’s final order in that docket approved a comprehensive settlement agreement among the Company, the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission and the Office of Consumer Advocate which included the effect of the tax changes in the calculation of the revenue requirement. With respect to Unitil Energy, on April 30, 2018 the NHPUC approved the Company’s annual step increase pursuant to the provisions of its last base rate case, which included adjustments to account for the TCJA’s income tax changes.

In Massachusetts, the MDPU issued an order opening an investigation into the effect on rates of the decrease in the federal corporate income tax rate on the MDPU’s regulated utilities, and required each utility subject to its jurisdiction to submit proposals to address the effects of the TCJA and to reduce its rates as of January 1, 2018. The MDPU consolidated an earlier petition filed by the Attorney General requesting such an investigation into its order. On June 29, 2018, the MDPU issued an order accepting Fitchburg’s proposal to decrease the annual revenue requirement of both its gas and electric divisions by $0.8 million each. The MDPU will address the refund of excess accumulated deferred income taxes in phase two of its investigation. An order is pending.

On May 2, 2018, Granite State filed an uncontested rate settlement with FERC which accounted for the effects of the TCJA in its rates. The settlement was approved by FERC on June 27, 2018, and complies with and satisfies the FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning the justness and reasonableness of rates in light of the corporate income tax reduction under the TCJA.

Base Rate Case Activity

Unitil Energy – Base Rates –On April 20, 2017 the NHPUC approvedissued its final order providing for a permanent increase of $4.1 million, in electric base rates, and a three year rate plan with an additional rate step adjustment, effective May 1, 2017, of $0.9 million, followed by two annual rate step adjustments in May of 2018 and 2019 to recover the revenue requirements associated with annualcertain capital expenditures. On April 30, 2018, the NHPUC approved Unitil Energy’s secondthe first step adjustment filing.increase, effective May 1, 2018. The filing incorporated the revenue requirement of $3.3 million for 2017 plant additions, a reduction of $2.2 million for the effect of the federal tax decrease pursuant to the TCJA, along with the termination of theone-year $1.4 million reconciliation adjustment which had recouped the difference between temporary rates and final rates. The net effect of the three adjustments resulted in a revenue decrease of $0.3 million. On February 28, 2019, Unitil Energy filed its second and final step adjustment seeking a revenue increase of approximately $340,000. On April 22, 2019 this final step adjustment was approved by the NHPUC, effective May 1, 2019.

Fitchburg – Base Rates – Electric –Fitchburg’s base rates are decoupled, and subject to an annual revenue decoupling adjustment mechanism, which includes a cap on the amount that rates may be increased in any year. In Fitchburg’s last base rate order from the MDPU, issued in April 2016, included the approval ofMDPU approved an annual capital cost recovery mechanism to recover the revenue requirement associated with certain capital additions. While a number of the capital cost recovery filings may remain pending fromyear-to-year in any given year, the Company considers these to be routine regulatory proceedings and there are no material issues outstanding. On June 28, 2018, Fitchburg filed its compliance report of capital investments for calendar year 2017. This matter remains pending.On November 1, 2018, Fitchburg filed its cumulative revenue requirement associated with the Company’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 capital expenditures and associated Capital Cost Adjustment Factors to become

Fitchburg – Electric Grid Modernization –

effective on January 1, 2019. On May 10,December 27, 2018, the MDPU issued an order approving a three year grid modernization investment plan for Fitchburg for the period 2018 through 2020 with a spending cap of $4.4 million. The order provides for a cost recovery mechanism for incremental capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses. The electric distribution companies in Massachusetts jointly filed compliance filings in August 2018 including 1) revised proposed performance metrics designed to addresspre-authorized grid-facing investments, 2) a proposed evaluation plan for the three-year investment term, and 3) a model tariff for cost recovery including proposed protocol for identifying and tracking incremental O&M expenses. Approval of these filings is pending. The next three year investment plan is due July 1, 2020 for the period 2021 through 2023, and is required to include a five year strategic plan for 2021 – 2025.

Fitchburg – Solar Generation –On November 9, 2016, the MDPU approved Fitchburg’s petition to develop a 1.3 MW solar generation facility located on Company property in Fitchburg Massachusetts. Construction of the solar generating facility was completed and the facility began generating power on November 22, 2017. On April 2, 2018, Fitchburg submitted its first filing pursuant to its SolarCapital Cost Adjustment tariff, by which the Company recovers its annual revenue requirement related to its investment in the solar generation facility. The filing sought a net amount of approximately $0.3 million for recovery effective June 1, 2018. The recovery of this amount in rates wasFactors were approved by the MDPU on May 31, 2018, subject to further investigation and reconciliation. AOn April 3, 2019, the MDPU issued a final order isapproving Fitchburg’s 2017 filing, which provides for the recovery of the sum of the revenue requirement and reconciliation adjustment of $0.4 million. Final approval of the 2018 filing remains pending.

Fitchburg – Base Rates – Gas –Pursuant to the Company’s revenue decoupling adjustment clause tariff, as approved in its last base rate case, the Company is allowed to modify, on a semi-annual basis, its base distribution rates to an established revenue per customer target in order to mitigate economic, weather and energy efficiency impacts to the Company’s revenues. The MDPU has consistently found that the Company’s filings are in accord with its approved tariffs, applicable law and precedent, and that they result in just and reasonable rates.

Fitchburg – Gas System Enhancement Program –Pursuant to statute and MDPU order, Fitchburg has an approved Gas System Enhancement Plan (GSEP) tariff through which it may recover certain gas infrastructure replacement and safety related investment costs, subject to an annual cap. Under the plan, the Company is required to make two annual filings with the MDPU: a forward-looking filing for the subsequent construction year, to be filed on or before October 31; and a filing, submitted on or before May 1, of final project documentation for projects completed during the prior year, demonstrating substantial compliance with its plan in effect for that year and showing that project costs were reasonably and prudently incurred. While a number of the filings under the GSEP tariff may remain pending fromyear-to-year in any given year, the Company considers these to be routine regulatory proceedings and there are no material issues outstanding. Under this tariff, a revenue increase of $0.9 million went into effect on May 1, 2018, subject to the annual cap and reconciliation. On October 31, 2018, the MDPU approved the Company’s request for a waiver of the annual cap in order to recover its reconciliation adjustment of $0.4 million effective November 1, 2018 associated with its actual 2017 revenue requirement. On October 31, 2018, the Company filed to increase the annual cap for two years and is seeking recovery of a revenue increase of $0.8 million, subject to the annual cap and reconciliation, for effect May 1, 2019. This matter remains pending.

Northern Utilities – Base Rates – Maine –On February 28, 2018, the MPUC issued its Final Order (Order) in Northern Utilities pendingUtilities’ most recent base rate case. The Order provided for an annual revenue increase of $2.1 million before a reduction of $2.2 million to incorporate the effect of the lower federal income tax rate under the TCJA. The MPUC Order approved a return on equity of 9.5 percent and a capital structure reflecting 50 percent equity and 50 percent long-term debt. The Order also provides for a reduction in annual depreciation expense, reducing the Company’s annual operating costs by approximately $0.5 million, and addressed a number of other issues, including a change to therm billing, increases in other delivery charges, and cost recovery under the Company’s Targeted AreaBuild-out (TAB) Program and Targeted Infrastructure Replacement Adjustment (TIRA) mechanism. The new rates and other changes became effective on March 1, 2018.

Northern Utilities – Targeted Infrastructure Replacement Adjustment (TIRA) – Maine –The settlement in Northern Utilities’ Maine division’s 2013 rate case allowed the Company to implement a TIRA rate mechanism to adjust base distribution rates annually to recover the revenue requirements associated with targeted investments in gas distribution system infrastructure replacement and upgrade projects, including the Company’s Cast Iron Replacement Program (CIRP). The TIRA had an initial term of four years and covered targeted capital expenditures in 2013 through 2016. In its Order in the currentmost recent base rate case (see above), the MPUC approved an extension of the TIRA mechanism, with adjustment, for an additional eight-year period, which will allow for annual rate adjustments through the end of the CIRP program. On May 7, 2018, the MPUC approved the Company’s request to increase its annual base rates by 2.4%, or $1.1 million, to recover the revenue requirements for 2017 eligible facilities.

Northern Utilities – Targeted AreaBuild-out Program – Maine –In December 2015, the MPUC approved a TAB program and associated rate surcharge mechanism. This program is designed to allow the economic extension of natural gas mains to new, targeted service areas in Maine. It allows customers in the targeted area the ability to pay a rate surcharge, instead of a large upfront payment or capital contribution to connect to the natural gas delivery system. The initial pilot of the TAB program was

approved for the City of Saco, and is being built out over a period of three years, with the potential to add 1,000 new customers and approximately $1 million in annual distribution revenue in the Saco area. A second TAB program was approved for the Town of Sanford, and has the potential to add 2,000 new customers and approximately $2 million in annual distribution revenue in the Sanford area. In its base rate case Order (described above), On April 17, 2019, the MPUC approved the inclusion of Saco TAB investments in rateCompany’s request to increase its annual base along with a cost recovery incentive mechanismrates by 2.1%, or $1.0 million, to recover the revenue requirements for future TAB investments.2018 eligible facilities.

Northern Utilities – Base Rates – New Hampshire –On May 2, 2018, the NHPUC approved a settlement agreement providing for an annual revenue increase of $2.6 million, a reduction of annual revenue of $1.7 million to reflect the effect of the TCJA, and a step increase of $2.3 million to recover post-test year capital investments, all effective May 1, 2018 (with the revenue increase of $2.6 million reconciling to the date of temporary rates of August 1, 2017 and the revenue decrease for TCJA reconciling to January 1, 2018), for a net increase of approximately $3.2 million. Under the terms of the agreement, on February 27, 2019, the Company may filefiled for a second step increase of approximately $1.4 million of annual revenue for effect May 1, 2019 to recover eligible capital investments in 2018, up2018. This matter remains pending. According to a revenue requirement capthe terms of $2.2 million. If the Company chooses the option to implement the second step increase, thesettlement agreement, Northern Utilities’ next distribution base rate case willshall be based on an historic test year of no earlier than twelve months ending December 31, 2020.

Northern Utilities – Franchise Extensions – New Hampshire –On October 3, 2018, the NHPUC granted Northern Utilities authority to expand its previously limited franchise to provide natural gas service in the Towns of Kingston and Atkinson, New Hampshire to serve new industrial, commercial and residential customers. Northern Utilities has also petitioned the NHPUC to extend its franchise into the Town of Epping, New Hampshire, where new commercial and residential developments present the Company with opportunities for growth. The franchise petition for service to the Town of Epping remains pending.

Granite State – Base Rates –On May 2, 2018, Granite State filed an uncontested rate settlement with FERC which provided for no change in rates, and accounted for the effects of a capital step adjustment offset by the effect of the TCJA. The settlement was approved by FERC on June 27, 2018, and complies with the FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning the justness and reasonableness of rates in light of the corporate income tax reductions under the TCJA. The settlement also provides that Granite State may not file a general (Section 4) rate case prior to April 30, 2019.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following section of MD&A compares the results of operations for each of the two fiscal periods ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 and September 30, 2017 and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

The Company’s results of operations reflect the seasonal nature of the natural gas business. Annual gas revenues are substantially realized during the heating season as a result of higher sales of natural gas due to cold weather. Accordingly, the results of operations are historically most favorable in the first and fourth quarters. Fluctuations in seasonal weather conditions may have a significant effect on the result of operations. Sales of electricity are generally less sensitive to weather than natural gas sales, but may also be affected by the weather conditions in both the winter and summer seasons. Also, as a result of recent rate cases, the Company’s natural gas sales margins are derived from a higher percentage of fixed billing components, including customer charges. Therefore, natural gas revenues and margin will be less affected by the seasonal nature of the natural gas business. In addition, as previously discussed, above, approximately 27% and 11% of the Company’s total annual electric and natural gas sales volumes, respectively, are decoupled and changes in sales to existing customers do not affect sales margin.

Earnings Overview

The Company’s Net Income was $2.8$26.5 million, or $0.19$1.78 per share, for the thirdfirst quarter of 2018,2019, an increase of $0.5$10.9 million or $0.03 per share,in Net Income, and $0.72 in Earnings Per Share, compared to the thirdfirst quarter of 2017. For2018. In the nine months ended September 30, 2018,first quarter of 2019; the Company reported Net Incomerecognized aone-time net gain of $22.0$9.8 million, or $1.49 per share, an increase$0.66 in EPS, on the Company’s divestiture of $4.2 million, or $0.22 per share, compared toitsnon-regulated business subsidiary, Usource. In addition, the same nine month period in 2017. The increases inCompany’s earnings in 2018the first quarter of 2019 were driven by higher natural gas and electric sales margins, reflecting: customer growth, favorable impactspartially offset by higher utility operating expenses. Earnings for the Company’s utility operations were Net Income of weather on unit sales and new distribution rates. Also, earnings$16.7 million, or $1.12 per share, reflect a higher numberfor the first quarter of shares outstanding due2019, an increase of $1.1 million in Net Income, and $0.06 in EPS compared to the issuancefirst quarter of 690,000 common shares on December 14, 2017, discussed below in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.2018.

Natural gas sales margins were $17.6 million and $80.4$43.5 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, increasesMarch 31, 2019, an increase of $0.8$3.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively, compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017.2018. Gas sales marginmargins in the first nine monthsquarter of 2018 was2019 were positively affected by higher natural gas distribution revenuesrates of $5.9$2.6 million partially offset by lower revenues of $2.9and $1.0 million to account for the reduction in rates due to the lower corporate income tax rate of 21% under the TCJA. As a result of the final base rate award in the Company’s New Hampshire gas utility, the Company recognized concurrentnon-recurring adjustments to increase both Gas Operating Revenues and Operation and Maintenance (O&M) expenses by $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2018 to reconcile permanent rates and deferred costs to the temporary rates which were effective July 1, 2017. Gas margin in the first nine months of 2018 also reflects the positive effect of colder winter weather andfrom higher therm sales, reflecting customer growth on sales volume of $2.1 million.growth.

Natural gas therm sales decreased 2.9% and increased 5.5%2.1% in the three and nine month periodsmonths ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017.2018. The increase in gas therm sales in the Company’s service areas in the nine month period was driven by customer growth and a colder winter in 2018 compared to 2017. Based on weather data collected in the Company’s naturalgrowth. The Company estimates that weather-normalized gas service areas, theretherm sales, excluding decoupled sales, were 9% more Heating Degree Days (HDD)up 5.0% in the first nine monthsquarter of 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the number of total natural gas customers served has increased by approximately 1,200 over1,533 compared to the lastprior year.

Electric sales margins were $25.9 million and $70.5$23.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, increasesMarch 31, 2019, an increase of $1.1$0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017.2018. Electric sales marginmargins in the first nine monthsquarter of 2018 was2019 were positively affected by higher electric distribution revenuesrates of $2.5$1.2 million, partially offset by lower revenues of $2.1 million in 2018 to account for the reduction in rates due to the lower corporate income tax rate of 21% under the TCJA. Electric sales margin in the current period was also positively affected by warmer-than-average summer temperatures and customer growth of $1.4 million. These positive impacts on electric sales margin were partially offset by the absence in the current period of aone-year $1.4$0.4 million, temporary rate reconciliation adjustment recognized in 2017 Electric Operating Revenues by the Company’s New Hampshire electric utility.reflecting lower kWh sales.

Total electric kilowatt-hour (kWh) sales increased 3.4% and 4.2%, respectively, in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018decreased 4.3% compared to the same periodsfirst quarter of 2018. The decrease in 2017. The increasekWh sales reflects a shorter billing cycle in the nine month period reflects customer growth, the favorable impactsfirst quarter of weather on unit sales and higher2019 combined with overall lower average usage, including reduced usage by industrial customers for production purposes. Based on weather data collectedpurposes, partially offset by customer growth. As of March 31, 2019, the number of electric customers served has increased by 549 over the last year.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) expenses increased $1.2 million in the Company’s electric service areas, there were 48.7% more Cooling Degree Days (CDD) in the third quarter of 2018three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2017. As of September 30, 2018, the number of total electric customers served has increased by approximately 575 over the last year.

2018. Excluding anon-recurring adjustment to decrease O&M expenses decreased $0.5by $0.4 million and increased $2.1 millionin the first quarter of 2018 in connection with a then ongoing base rate case for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. The decrease in the three month period reflects lower professional fees of $0.5 million and lower labor costs of $0.3 million, partially offset by higher utility operating costs of $0.3Company’s New Hampshire natural gas utility; O&M expenses increased $0.8 million. The increasechange in the nine month periodO&M expenses reflects higher labor costs of $1.5$0.4 million and higher utility operating costs of $1.9 million, offset by lower professional fees of $1.3$0.4 million. The higher utility operating costs in the nine month period include anon-recurring temporary rate adjustment to increase O&M expenses by $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2018, which was offset by a corresponding increase in gas revenue.

Depreciation and Amortization expense increased $1.6 million and $2.2$1.5 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. These increases reflect2018, reflecting higher utility plant in service and higher amortization of information technology costs, partially offset by lower amortization of deferred major storm costs which were being amortized for recovery over multi-year periods.amortization.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $0.6 million and $0.9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017,2018, primarily reflecting higher local property tax rates on higher levels of utility plant assets in serviceservice.

Other (Income) Expense, Net changed from an expense of $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2018 to income of $12.1 million in the first quarter of 2019, a net change of $13.8 million. This change primarily reflects apre-tax gain of $13.4 million on the Company’s divestiture of itsnon-regulated business subsidiary, Usource. The Usource divestiture generated a capital gain to the Company and higher payroll taxes.a $3.6 million provision is included in the Company’s first quarter income tax expense discussed below.

Interest Expense, netNet increased $0.2 million and $0.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. These increases2018, primarily reflectreflecting higher short-term interest rates on higher levels of short-term debt, partially offset by lower interest on long-term debt.

Federal and State Income Taxes increased $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, primarily reflecting income taxes related to the Company’s divestiture of itsnon-regulated business subsidiary, Usource.

At its January 2018,2019 and April 2018, July 2018 and October 20182019 meetings, Unitil’sthe Unitil Corporation Board of Directors declared quarterly dividends on the Company’s common stock of $0.365$0.37 per share. These quarterly dividends result in a current effective annualized dividend rate of $1.46$1.48 per share, representing an unbroken record of quarterly dividend payments since trading began in Unitil’s common stock.

A more detailed discussion of the Company’s results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 is presented below.

Gas Sales, Revenues and Margin

Therm Sales –Unitil’s total therm sales of natural gas decreased 2.9% and increased 5.5%2.1% in the three and nine month periodsmonths ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. In the third quarter of 2018, sales to Residential and C&I customers decreased 10.7% and 2.0%, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, reflecting warmer late summerincreases of 0.8% and early fall weather2.6% in 2018, partially offset by customer growth. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, sales to Residential and C&ICommercial and Industrial (C&I) customers, increased 7.2% and 5.0%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2017.respectively. The increase in gas therm sales in the Company’s service areas in the nine month period was driven by customer growth and a colder winter in 2018 compared to 2017. Based on weather data collected in the Company’s natural gas service areas, there were 9% more HDD in the first nine months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017.growth. The Company estimates that weather-normalized gas therm sales, excluding decoupled sales, were up 2.0%5.0% in the first nine monthsquarter of 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the number of total natural gas customers served has increased by approximately 1,200 over1,533 compared to the lastprior year. As previously discussed, sales marginsmargin derived from decoupled unit sales (representing approximately 11% of total annual therm sales volume) areis not sensitive to changes in gas therm sales.

The following table details total firm therm sales for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, by major customer class:

 

Therm Sales (millions)

 
    Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   2018   2017   Change  % Change  2018   2017   Change   % Change 

Residential

   2.5    2.8    (0.3  (10.7%)   35.9    33.5    2.4    7.2

Commercial / Industrial

   23.9    24.4    (0.5  (2.0%)   132.3    126.0    6.3    5.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total

   26.4    27.2    (0.8  (2.9%)   168.2    159.5    8.7    5.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Gas Operating Revenues and Sales Margin – The following table details total Gas Operating Revenues and Sales Margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:

Therm Sales (millions)

 
    Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2019   2018   Change  % Change 

Residential

   24.0   23.8   0.2   0.8

Commercial / Industrial

   72.1   70.3   1.8   2.6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

   96.1   94.1   2.0   2.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Gas Operating Revenues and Sales Margin – The following table details total Gas Operating Revenues and Sales Margin for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Gas Operating Revenues and Sales Margin (millions)

 
    Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2019   2018   $ Change  % Change 

Gas Operating Revenues:

       

Residential

  $35.8   $35.8   $ —     —   

Commercial / Industrial

   50.6    51.2    (0.6  (1.2%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Gas Operating Revenues

  $86.4   $87.0   $(0.6  (0.7%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Cost of Gas Sales

  $42.9   $47.1   $(4.2  (8.9%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Gas Sales Margin

  $43.5   $39.9   $3.6   9.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Gas Operating Revenues and Sales Margin (millions)

 
    Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   2018   2017   $ Change  % Change  2018   2017   $ Change   % Change 

Gas Operating Revenue:

              

Residential

  $9.2   $9.1   $0.1   1.1 $58.9   $53.4   $5.5    10.3

Commercial / Industrial

   16.5    16.0    0.5   3.1  88.5    78.5    10.0    12.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Gas Operating Revenue

  $25.7   $25.1   $0.6   2.4 $147.4   $131.9   $15.5    11.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Cost of Gas Sales

  $8.1   $8.3   $(0.2  (2.4%)  $67.0   $56.6   $10.4    18.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Gas Sales Margin

  $17.6   $16.8   $0.8   4.8 $80.4   $75.3   $5.1    6.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

The Company analyzes operating results using Gas Sales Margin, anon-GAAP measure. Gas Sales Margin is calculated as Total Gas Operating Revenues (See “Utility Revenue Recognition” in Note 1 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements) less Cost of Gas Sales. The Company believes Gas Sales Margin is an important measure to analyze profitability because the approved cost of sales are tracked and reconciled costs that are passed through directly to the customer, resulting in an equal and offsetting amount reflected in Total Gas Operating Revenue. Sales margin can be reconciled to Operating Income, a GAAP measure, by including Operation and Maintenance, Depreciation and Amortization and Taxes Other Than Income Taxes for each segment in the analysis.

Natural gas sales margins were $17.6 million and $80.4$43.5 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, increasesMarch 31, 2019, an increase of $0.8$3.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively, compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017.2018. Gas sales marginmargins in the thirdfirst quarter of 2018 was2019 were positively affected by higher natural gas distribution revenuesrates of $1.1$2.6 million partially offset by lower revenue of $0.4and $1.0 million to account for the reduction in rates due to the lower corporate income tax rate of 21% under the TCJA. The reduction in revenues related to the TCJA also reflects a lower provision for income taxes in the period. Gasfrom higher therm sales, margin in the third quarter of 2018 also reflects the effect ofreflecting customer growth on sales volume of $0.1 million.growth.

Gas sales margin in the first nine months of 2018 was positively affected by higher natural gas distribution revenues of $5.9 million, partially offset by lower revenue of $2.9 million to account for the reduction in rates due to the lower corporate income tax rate of 21% under the TCJA. As a result of the final base rate award in the Company’s New Hampshire gas utility, the Company recognized concurrentnon-recurring adjustments to increase both Gas Operating Revenues and O&M expenses by $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2018 to reconcile permanent rates and deferred costs to the temporary rates which were effective July 1, 2017. Gas margin in the first nine months of 2018 also reflects the positive effect of colder winter weather and customer growth on sales volume of $2.1 million.

The increasedecrease in Total Gas Operating Revenues of $0.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017first quarter of 2019 reflects higher natural gas distribution rates and customer growth, partially offset by lower natural gas sales volumes, lower revenue related to the TCJA, discussed above, and lower cost of gas sales, which are tracked and reconciled costs as a pass-through to customers. The increase in Total Gas Operating Revenues of $15.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 reflects higher natural gas distribution rates, customer growth, higher natural gas sales volumes and higher cost of gas sales, whichthat are tracked and reconciled costs as a pass-throughpassed through directly to customers, partially offset by lower revenue related to the TCJA, discussed above.higher natural gas sales volumes.

Electric Sales, Revenues and Margin

Kilowatt-hour SalesIn the first quarter of 2019, Unitil’s total electric kWh sales increased 3.4% and 4.2%, respectively, in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018decreased 4.3% compared to the same periods in 2017. In the thirdfirst quarter of 2018, sales2018. Sales to Residential and C&I customers increased 9.2%decreased 3.7% and decreased 0.4%4.8%, respectively, in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, reflecting warmer-than-average summer temperaturesa shorter billing cycle in 2018 and customer growth. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, sales to Residential and C&I customers increased 6.3% and 2.7%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2017, reflecting customer growth, the favorable impactsfirst quarter of weather on unit sales and higher2019 combined with overall lower average usage, including reduced usage by industrial customers for production purposes. Based on weather data collected in the Company’s electric service areas, there were 48.7% more CDD in the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 and 9.0% more HDD in the first nine months of 2018 compared to the same period in 2017.purposes, partially offset by customer growth. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the number of total electric customers served has increased by approximately 575549 over the last year. As previously discussed, sales margins derived from decoupled unit sales (representing approximately 27% of total annual kWh sales volume) are not sensitive to changes in electric kWh sales.

The following table details total kWh sales for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 by major customer class:

 

kWh Sales (millions)

kWh Sales (millions)

 

kWh Sales (millions)

 
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,   Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   Change % Change 2018   2017   Change   % Change   2019   2018   Change % Change 

Residential

   195.0    178.5    16.5   9.2  527.8    496.4    31.4    6.3   181.5   188.5   (7.0  (3.7%) 

Commercial / Industrial

   268.3    269.5    (1.2  (0.4%)   755.9    735.9    20.0    2.7   236.0   247.8   (11.8  (4.8%) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total

   463.3    448.0    15.3   3.4  1,283.7    1,232.3    51.4    4.2   417.5   436.3   (18.8  (4.3%) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

  

Electric Operating Revenues and Sales Margin – The following table details total Electric Operating Revenues and Sales Margin for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:2018:

 

Electric Operating Revenues and Sales Margin (millions)

Electric Operating Revenues and Sales Margin (millions)

 

Electric Operating Revenues and Sales Margin (millions)

 
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,   Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   $ Change   % Change 2018   2017   $ Change   % Change   2019   2018   $ Change   % Change 

Electric Operating Revenue:

               

Electric Operating Revenues:

        

Residential

  $35.5   $32.2   $3.3    10.2 $95.7   $86.9   $8.8    10.1  $38.8   $33.8   $5.0    14.8

Commercial / Industrial

   25.9    25.3    0.6    2.4  71.9    67.5    4.4    6.5   26.0    23.7    2.3    9.7
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

Total Electric Operating Revenue

  $61.4   $57.5   $3.9    6.8 $167.6   $154.4   $13.2    8.5

Total Electric Operating Revenues

  $64.8   $57.5   $7.3    12.7
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

Cost of Electric Sales

  $35.5   $32.7   $2.8    8.6 $97.1   $84.3   $12.8    15.2

Total Cost of Electric Sales

  $41.7   $35.2   $6.5    18.5
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

Electric Sales Margin

  $25.9   $24.8   $1.1    4.4 $70.5   $70.1   $0.4    0.6  $23.1   $22.3   $0.8    3.6
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

The Company analyzes operating results using Electric Sales Margin, anon-GAAP measure. Electric Sales Margin is calculated as Total Electric Operating Revenues (See “Utility Revenue Recognition” in Note 1 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements) less Cost of Electric Sales. The Company believes Electric Sales Margin is an important measure to analyze profitability because the approved cost of sales are tracked and reconciled costs that are passed through directly to the customer resulting in an equal and offsetting amount reflected in Total Electric Operating Revenues. Sales margin can be reconciled to Operating Income, a GAAP measure, by including Operation and Maintenance, Depreciation and Amortization and Taxes Other Than Income Taxes for each segment in the analysis.

Electric sales margins were $25.9 million and $70.5$23.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, increasesMarch 31, 2019, an increase of $1.1$0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017.2018. Electric sales marginmargins in the thirdfirst quarter wasof 2019 were positively affected by higher electric distribution revenuesrates of $0.8$1.2 million, partially offset by lower revenue of $0.6 million in 2018 to account for the reduction in rates due to the lower corporate income tax rate of 21% under the TCJA. The reduction in revenues related to the TCJA also reflects a lower provision for income taxes in the period. Electric sales margin in the current period was also positively affected by warmer-than-average summer temperatures and customer growth on sales volume of $0.9 million.

Electric sales margin in the first nine months of 2018 was positively affected by higher electric distribution revenues of $2.5$0.4 million, partially offset byreflecting lower revenues of $2.1 million in 2018 to account for the reduction in rates due to the lower corporate income tax rate of 21% under the TCJA. Electric sales margin in the current period was also positively affected by warmer-than-average summer temperatures and customer growth of $1.4 million. These positive impacts on electric sales margin were partially offset by the absence in the current period of aone-year $1.4 million temporary rate reconciliation adjustment recognized in 2017 Electric Operating Revenues by the Company’s New Hampshire electric utility.kWh sales.

The increase in Total Electric Operating Revenues of $3.9$7.3 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 20182019 reflects higher electric distribution rates and higher cost of electric sales, which are tracked and reconciled to costs as a pass-throughthat are passed through directly to customers, partially offset by lower revenue related to the TCJA, discussed above.

The increase in Total Electric Operating Revenuessales of $13.2 million in the first nine months of 2018 reflects higher electric distribution rates and higher cost of electric sales, which are tracked and reconciled to costs as a pass-through to customers, partially offset by anon-recurring adjustment in the second quarter of 2017 to increase revenue by $1.4 million related to the completion of a base rate case and lower revenue related to the TCJA, discussed above.electricity.

Operating Revenue – Other

The following table details total Other Operating Revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and 2017:2018:

 

Other Revenue (000’s)

 
    Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   2018   2017   $ Change  % Change  2018   2017   $ Change  % Change 

Other

  $1.1   $1.4   $(0.3  (21.4%)  $3.5   $4.5   $(1.0  (22.2%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Other Revenue

  $1.1   $1.4   $(0.3  (21.4%)  $3.5   $4.5   $(1.0  (22.2%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Other Operating Revenue (Millions)

 
    Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2019   2018   $ Change  % Change 

Other

  $0.9   $1.3   $(0.4  (30.8%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Other Operating Revenue

  $0.9   $1.3   $(0.4  (30.8%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total Other Operating Revenue (See “Other Operating Revenue –Non-regulated” in Note 1 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements), which is comprised of revenues from the Company’snon-regulated energy brokering business, Usource. Usource’s revenues are primarily derived from fees and charges billed to suppliers as customers take delivery of energy from those suppliers under term contracts brokered by Usource.

Usource’s revenuesUsource, decreased $0.3$0.4 million, or 21.4%, and $1.0 million, or 22.2%,30.8% in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2018, respectively,first quarter of 2019, compared to the same periods in 2017, primarily as a result of the adoption of a new accounting standard.

In the first quarter of 2018, reflecting the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU)2014-09, and its subsequent clarifications and amendments outlined in ASU2015-14, ASU2016-08, ASU2016-10 and ASU2017-13, on a modified retrospective basis, which requires application to contracts with customers effective January 1, 2018. ASU2014-09 requires that payments made byCompany’s divestiture of Usource to third parties (“Channel Partners”) for revenue sharing agreements are recognized as a reduction from revenue, where those payments were previously recognized as an operating expense. Therefore, beginning in 2018 and going forward, payments made by Usource to third parties for revenue sharing agreements are reported as “Other” in the “Operating Revenues” sectionfirst quarter of the Consolidated Statements2019 (See “Divestiture of Earnings, along with Usource’s revenues. PriorNon-Regulated Business Subsidiary” in Note 1 to the adoption of ASU2014-09, payments by Usource to Channel Partners for revenue sharing agreements are included as “Operation and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of theaccompanying Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Those Channel Partner payments were $0.3 million and $0.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Channel Partner payments were $0.8 million and $0.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

If ASU2014-09 had been in effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the result would have been corresponding reductions of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, in both “Other” in the “Operating Revenues” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and “Operation and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings.Financial Statements).

Operating Expenses

Cost of Gas Sales – Cost of Gas Sales includes the cost of natural gas purchased and manufactured to supply the Company’s total gas supply requirements and spending on energy efficiency programs. Cost of Gas Sales decreased $0.2$4.2 million, or 2.4%, and increased $10.4 million, or 18.4%8.9%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. The2019. This decrease in the three month period primarily reflects lower sales of natural gas and lower wholesale natural gas prices, partially offset by a decrease in the amount of natural gas purchased by customers directly from third-party suppliers. The increase in the nine month period reflects higher sales of natural gas and higher wholesale natural gas prices.gas. The Company reconciles and recovers the approved Cost of Gas Sales in its rates at cost on a pass-through basis and therefore changes in approved expenses do not affect earnings.

Cost of Electric Sales – Cost of Electric Sales includes the cost of electric supply as well as other energy supply related restructuring costs, including power supply buyout costs, and spending on energy efficiency programs. Cost of Electric Sales increased $2.8$6.5 million, or 8.6% and $12.8 million, or 15.2%18.5%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. The2018. This increase in the three month period reflects higher electric sales and a decrease in the amount of electricity purchased by customers directly from third-party suppliers. The increase in the nine month period reflects higher electric sales, higher wholesale electricity prices and a decrease in the amount of electricity purchased by customers directly from third-party suppliers.suppliers, partially offset by lower sales of electricity. The Company reconciles and recovers the approved Cost of Electric Sales in its rates at cost on a pass-through basis and therefore changes in approved expenses do not affect earnings.

Operation and MaintenanceO&M expense includes gaselectric and electricgas utility operating costs, and the operating costs of the Company’s corporate and other business activities. Total O&M expenses decreased $0.5increased $1.2 million, and increased $2.1 million foror 6.9%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. The2018. Excluding anon-recurring adjustment to decrease O&M expenses by $0.4 million in the three month period reflects lower professional feesfirst quarter of $0.52018 in connection with a then ongoing base rate case for the Company’s New Hampshire natural gas utility; O&M expenses increased $0.8 million, and lower labor costs of $0.3 million, partially offset by higher utility operating costs of $0.3 million.or 4.6%. The increasechange in the nine month periodO&M expenses reflects higher labor costs of $1.5$0.4 million and higher utility operating costs of $1.9 million, offset by lower professional fees of $1.3$0.4 million. The higher utility operating costs in the nine month period include anon-recurring temporary rate adjustment to increase O&M expenses by $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2018, which was offset by a corresponding increase in gas revenue.

Depreciation and Amortization –Depreciation and Amortization expense increased $1.6$1.5 million, or 14.8%, and $2.2 million, or 6.3%12.2%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. These increases reflect2018, reflecting higher utility plant in service and higher amortization of information technology costs, partially offset by lower amortization of deferred major storm costs which were being amortized for recovery over multi-year periods.amortization.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes – Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $0.6 million, or 12.2% and $0.9 million, or 5.8%10.3%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017,2018, primarily reflecting higher local property tax rates on higher levels of utility plant assets in service and higher payroll taxes.service.

Other (Income) Expense, netNet –Other (Income) Expense, net increased $0.2Net changed from an expense of $1.7 million or 22.2%, and $0.4 million, or 10.8%, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017. In the first quarter of 2018 to income of $12.1 million in the first quarter of 2019, a net change of $13.8 million. This change primarily reflects apre-tax gain of $13.4 million on the Company’s divestiture of Usource, discussed above. The Usource divestiture generated a capital gain to the Company adopted ASUNo. 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)” which amends the existing guidance relating to the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic other post-retirement benefit costs. On a retrospective basis, the amendment requires an employer to separate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and provides explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and other components$3.6 million provision is included in the Company’s first quarter income statement.

Accordingly, for all periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, the service cost component of the Company’s net periodic benefit costs is reported in “Operations and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings while the other components of net periodic benefit costs are reported in the “Other Expense (Income), net” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Prior to adoption, the Company reported all components of its net periodic benefit costs in “Operations and

Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. There are $1.2 million and $0.8 million ofnon-service cost net periodic benefit costs reported in “Other Expense (Income), net” for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively, net of amounts deferred as regulatory assets for future recovery. There are $4.1 million and $3.6 million ofnon-service cost net periodic benefit costs reported in “Other Expense (Income), net” for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively, net of amounts deferred as regulatory assets for future recovery.tax expense discussed below.

Income Taxes – Federal and State Income Taxes decreased by $1.0 million and $6.1increased $3.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periods in 2017. The decrease in the three month period reflects the lower tax rate onpre-tax earnings from the TCJA in 2018. The decrease in the nine month period reflects $5.0 million from the lower tax rate onpre-tax earnings in 2018, andprimarily reflecting income taxes related to the current tax benefitCompany’s divestiture of $1.1 million of book/tax temporary differences turning at the lower income tax rate from the TCJA in 2018.itsnon-regulated business subsidiary, Usource, discussed above.

Interest Expense, net –Net

Interest expense is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statementsfinancial statements net of interest income. Interest expense is mainly comprised of interest on long-term debt and short-term borrowings. In addition, certain reconciling rate mechanisms used by the Company’s distribution operating utilities give rise to regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities on which interest is calculated.accrued.

Unitil’s utility subsidiaries operate a number of reconciling rate adjustment mechanisms to recover specifically identified costs on a pass throughpass-through basis. These reconciling rate adjustment mechanisms track costs and revenue on a monthly basis. In any given month, this monthly tracking and reconciling process will produce either an under-collected or an over-collected balance of costs. In accordance with the distribution utilities’ rate tariffs, interest is accrued on these balances and will produce either interest income or interest expense. Consistent with regulatory precedent, interest income is recorded on an under-collection of costs which creates a regulatory asset to be recovered in future periods when rates are reset. Interest expense is recorded on an over-collection of costs, which creates a regulatory liability to be refunded in future periods when rates are reset.

 

Interest Expense, net (Millions)

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2018  2017  Change  2018  2017  Change 

Interest Expense

       

Long-term Debt

  $5.7  $5.3  $0.4  $17.3  $15.9  $1.4 

Short-term Debt

   0.7   0.8   (0.1  1.6   1.9   (0.3

Regulatory Liabilities

   0.2   0.3   (0.1  0.5   0.8   (0.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal Interest Expense

   6.6   6.4   0.2   19.4   18.6   0.8 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest (Income)

       

Regulatory Assets

   (0.2  (0.2  —     (0.6  (0.5  (0.1

AFUDC(1) and Other

   (0.4  (0.4  —     (0.9  (1.0  0.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal Interest (Income)

   (0.6  (0.6  —     (1.5  (1.5  —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Interest Expense, net

  $6.0  $5.8  $0.2  $17.9  $17.1  $0.8 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

AFUDC – Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.

Interest Expense, Net (millions)

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2019  2018  Change 

Interest Expense

    

Long-term Debt

  $5.7  $5.8  $(0.1

Short-term Debt

   1.0   0.5   0.5 

Regulatory Liabilities

   0.1   0.1   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal Interest Expense

   6.8   6.4   0.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest (Income)

    

Regulatory Assets

   (0.2  (0.2  —   

AFUDC and Other

   (0.4  (0.2  (0.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Subtotal Interest (Income)

   (0.6  (0.4  (0.2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Interest Expense, Net

  $6.2  $6.0  $0.2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest Expense, netNet increased $0.2 million and $0.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively,March 31, 2019 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2017. These increases2018, primarily reflectreflecting higher short-term interest rates on higher levels of short-term debt, partially offset by lower interest on long-term debt.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

Sources of Capital

Unitil requires capital to fund utility plant additions, working capital and other utility expenditures recovered in subsequent periods through regulated rates. The capital necessary to meet these requirements is derived primarily from internally-generated funds, which consist of cash flows from operating activities. The Company initially supplements internally-generated funds through short-term bank borrowings, as needed, under its unsecured revolving Credit Facility. Periodically, the Company replaces portions of its short-term debt with long-term financings more closely matched to the long-term nature of its utility assets. Additionally, from time to time, the Company has accessed the public capital markets through public offerings of equity securities. The Company’s utility operations are seasonal in nature and are therefore subject to seasonal fluctuations in cash flows. The amount, type and timing of any future financing will vary from year to year based on capital needs and maturity or redemptions of securities.

The Company and its subsidiaries are individually and collectively members of the Unitil Cash Pool (the “Cash Pool”). The Cash Pool is the financing vehicle forday-to-day cash borrowing and investing. The Cash Pool allows for an efficient exchange of cash among the Company and its subsidiaries. The interest rates charged to the subsidiaries for borrowing from the Cash Pool are based on actual interest costs from lenders under the Company’s revolving Credit Facility (as defined below). At September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, the Company and all of its subsidiaries were in compliance with the regulatory requirements to participate in the Cash Pool.

On July 25, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and related documents (collectively, the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lenders, which amended and restated in its entirety the Company’s prior credit facility. The Credit Facility extends to July 25, 2023, subject to twoone-year extensions under certain circumstances, and has a borrowing limit of $120 million, which includes a $25 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility provides the Company with the ability to elect that borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest under several options, including at a daily fluctuating rate of interest per annum equal toone-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.125%. The Company may increase the borrowing limit under the Credit Facility by up to $50 million under certain circumstances.

The Company utilizes the Credit Facility for cash management purposes related to its short-term operating activities. Total gross borrowings were $202.5$75.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. Total gross repayments were $171.7$92.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. The following table details the borrowing limits, amounts outstanding and amounts available under the Credit Facility as of SeptemberMarch 30, 2018, September2019, March 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2017:2018:

 

   Credit Facility ($ millions) 
   September 30,   December 31, 
   2018   2017   2017 

Limit

  $120.0   $120.0   $120.0 

Short-Term Borrowings Outstanding

   69.1    111.9    38.3 

Letters of Credit Outstanding

   —      1.1    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Available

  $50.9   $7.0   $81.7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   Revolving Credit Facility ($ millions) 
   March 31,   December 31, 
   2019   2018   2018 

Limit

  $120.0   $120.0   $120.0 

Short-Term Borrowings Outstanding

  $65.8   $45.3   $82.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Available

  $54.2   $74.7   $37.2 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Credit Facility contains customary terms and conditions for credit facilities of this type, including affirmative and negative covenants. There are restrictions on, among other things, the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to permit liens or incur indebtedness, and restrictions on the Company’s ability to merge or consolidate with another entity or change its line of business. The affirmative and negative covenants under the Credit Facility shall apply until the Credit Facility terminates and all amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility are paid in full (or with respect to letters of credit, they are cash collateralized). The only financial covenant in the Credit Facility provides that Funded Debt to Capitalization (as each term is defined in the Credit Facility) cannot exceed 65%, tested on a quarterly basis. At September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, the Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in the Credit Facility in effect on that date. (See also “Credit Arrangements” in Note 4.)

The Company believes the future operating cash flows of the Company, along with its existing borrowing availability and access to financial markets for the issuance of new long-term debt, will be sufficient to meet any working capital and future operating requirements, and capital investment forecast opportunities.

As discussed previously, the Company divested of itsnon-regulated subsidiary business, Usource, in the first quarter of 2019. The Company used the net proceeds of $9.8 million from this divestiture for general corporate purposes.

On November 1, 2017, Northern Utilities30, 2018 Unitil Energy issued $20 million of Notes due 2027 at 3.52% and $30 million of NotesFirst Mortgage Bonds due 2047November 30, 2048 at 4.32%4.18%. Fitchburg issued $10 million of Notes due 2027 at 3.52% and $15 million of Notes due 2047 at 4.32%. Granite State issued $15 million of Notes due 2027 at 3.72%. Northern Utilities, Fitchburg and Granite StateUnitil Energy used the net proceeds from these offerings to refinance higher cost long-term debt that matured in 2017,this offering to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes. Approximately $0.7$0.5 million of costs associated with these issuances have been netted against Long-Term Debtlong-term debt for presentation purposes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In April 2014, Unitil Service Corp. entered into a financing arrangement, structured as a capital lease obligation, for various information systems and technology equipment. Final funding under this capital lease occurred on October 30, 2015, resulting in total funding of $13.4 million. The capital lease matures on September 30, 2020. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there are $2.7$2.8 million of current and $3.0$1.6 million of noncurrent obligations under this capital lease on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Unitil Corporation and its utility subsidiaries, Fitchburg, Unitil Energy, Northern Utilities, and Granite State are currently rated “BBB+” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. Unitil Corporation and Granite State are currently rated “Baa2”, and Fitchburg, Unitil Energy and Northern Utilities are currently rated “Baa1” by Moody’s Investors Services.

The continued availability of various methods of financing, as well as the choice of a specific form of security for such financing, will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to: security market conditions; general economic climate; regulatory approvals; the ability to meet covenant issuance restrictions; the level of earnings, cash flows and financial position; and the competitive pricing offered by financing sources.

The Company provides limited guarantees on certain energy and natural gas storage management contracts entered into by the distribution utilities. The Company’s policy is to limit the duration of these guarantees. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there were approximately $5.6$4.3 million of guarantees outstanding.

Northern Utilities enters into asset management agreements under which Northern Utilities releases certain natural gas pipeline and storage assets, resells the natural gas storage inventory to an asset manager and subsequently repurchases the inventory over the course of the natural gas heating season at the same price at which it sold the natural gas inventory to the asset manager. There was $9.6$2.2 million, $9.0$1.0 million and $8.5$8.4 million of natural gas storage inventory at September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, respectively, related to these asset management agreements. The amount of natural gas inventory released in September 2018March 2019 and payable in October 2018April 2019 is $0.1$2.1 million and is recorded in Accounts Payable at September 30,March 31, 2019. The amount of natural gas inventory released in March 2018 and payable in April 2018 was $1.0 million and was recorded in Accounts Payable at March 31, 2018. The amount of natural gas inventory released in September 2017 and payable in October 2017 was $0.1 million and was recorded in Accounts Payable at September 30, 2017. The amount of natural gas inventory released in December 20172018 and payable in January 20182019 was $3.1$0.9 million and was recorded in Accounts Payable at December 31, 2017.2018.

The Company also guarantees the payment of principal, interest and other amounts payable on the 7.15% notes issued by Granite State. As of September 30, 2018, the principal amount outstanding for the 7.15% Granite State notes was $3.3 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company and its subsidiaries do not currently use, and are not dependent on the use of,off-balance sheet financing arrangements such as securitization of receivables or obtaining access to assets or cash through special purpose entities or variable interest entities. Unitil Corporation’s

subsidiaries conduct a portion of their operations in leased facilities and also lease some of their vehicles, machinery and office equipment under both capital and operating lease arrangements. Additionally, as of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there were approximately $5.6$4.3 million of guarantees on certain energy and natural gas storage management contracts entered into by the distribution utilities outstanding. See Note 4 (Debt and Financing Arrangements) to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In making those estimates and assumptions, the Company is sometimes required to make difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about the impact of matters that are inherently uncertain and for which different estimates that could reasonably have been used could have resulted in material differences in its financial statements. If actual results were to differ significantly from those estimates, assumptions and judgment, the financial position of the Company could be materially affected and the results of operations of the Company could be materially different than reported. For a complete discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies, refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report on Form10-Q and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 1, 2018.January 31, 2019.

LABOR RELATIONS

As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the Company and its subsidiaries had 513508 employees. The Company considers its relationship with employees to be good and has not experienced any major labor disruptions.

As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, a total of 165164 employees of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries were represented by labor unions. The following table details by subsidiary the employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) as of September 30, 2018:March 31, 2019:

 

   Employees Covered   CBA Expiration 

Fitchburg

   4745    05/31/20192022 

Northern Utilities NH Division

   34    06/05/2020 

Northern Utilities ME Division

   39    03/31/2021 

Granite State

   34    03/31/2021 

Unitil Energy

   3738    05/31/2023 

Unitil Service

   54    05/31/2023 

The CBAs provide discrete salary adjustments, established work practices and uniform benefit packages. The Company expects to negotiate new agreements prior to their expiration dates.

INTEREST RATE RISK

As discussed above, the CompanyUnitil meets its external financing needs by issuing short-term and long-term debt. The majority of debt outstanding represents long-term notes bearing fixed rates of interest. Changes in market interest rates do not affect interest expense resulting from these outstanding long-term debt securities. However, the Company periodically repays its short-term debt borrowings through the issuance of new long-term debt securities. Changes in market interest rates may affect the interest rate and corresponding interest expense on any new issuances of long-term debt securities. In addition, short-term debt borrowings bear a variable rate of interest. As a result, changes in short-term interest rates will increase or decrease interest expense in future periods. For example, if the average amount of short-term debt outstanding was $25 million for the period of one year, a change in interest rates of 1% would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $250,000. The average interest rates on the Company’s short-term borrowings and intercompany money pool transactions for the three months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and September 30,March 31, 2018 were 3.3%3.7% and 2.5%, respectively. The average interest rates on the Company’s short-term borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017 were 3.2% and 2.3%2.9%, respectively. The average interest rate on the Company’s short-term borrowings for the twelve months ended December 31, 20172018 was 2.4%3.3%.

COMMODITY PRICE RISK

Although Unitil Corporation’sUnitil’s three distribution utilities are subject to commodity price risk as part of their traditional operations, the current regulatory framework within which these companies operate allows for full collection of electric power and natural gas supply costs in rates on a pass-through basis. Consequently, there is limited commodity price risk after consideration of the related rate-making.

REGULATORY MATTERS

Please refer to Note 6 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a discussion of Regulatory Matters.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Please refer to Note 7 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a discussion of Environmental Matters.

Item 1.

Financial Statements

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(Millions, except per share data)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  Three Months  Ended
September 30,
   Nine Months  Ended
September 30,
 
  2018   2017   2018   2017   Three Months Ended
March  31,
 
  2019 2018 

Operating Revenues

           

Gas

  $25.7   $25.1   $147.4   $131.9   $86.4  $87.0 

Electric

   61.4    57.5    167.6    154.4    64.8   57.5 

Other

   1.1    1.4    3.5    4.5    0.9   1.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Operating Revenues

   88.2    84.0    318.5    290.8    152.1   145.8 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Operating Expenses

           

Cost of Gas Sales

   8.1    8.3    67.0    56.6    42.9   47.1 

Cost of Electric Sales

   35.5    32.7    97.1    84.3    41.7   35.2 

Operation and Maintenance

   16.4    16.9    51.5    49.4    18.5   17.3 

Depreciation and Amortization

   12.4    10.8    37.4    35.2    13.8   12.3 

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes

   5.5    4.9    16.5    15.6 

Taxes Other than Income Taxes

   6.4   5.8 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

   77.9    73.6    269.5    241.1    123.3   117.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Operating Income

   10.3    10.4    49.0    49.7    28.8   28.1 

Interest Expense, net

   6.0    5.8    17.9    17.1 

Other Expense, net

   1.1    0.9    4.1    3.7 

Interest Expense, Net

   6.2   6.0 

Other (Income) Expense, Net

   (12.1  1.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Income Before Income Taxes

   3.2    3.7    27.0    28.9    34.7   20.4 

Income Tax Expense

   0.4    1.4    5.0    11.1 

Provision For Income Taxes

   8.2   4.8 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Income

  $2.8   $2.3   $22.0   $17.8   $26.5  $15.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net Income Per Common Share

  $0.19   $0.16   $1.49   $1.27 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

   14.8    14.1    14.8    14.1 

Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock

  $0.365   $0.36   $1.095   $1.08 

Net Income Per Common Share (Basic and Diluted)

  $1.78  $1.06 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – (Basic and Diluted)

   14.9   14.8 

 

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated unaudited financial statements.)

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Millions)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

ASSETS:

            

Current Assets:

            

Cash and Cash Equivalents

  $6.3   $10.9   $8.9   $4.3   $9.5   $7.8 

Accounts Receivable, net

   52.3    45.8    67.4 

Accounts Receivable, Net

   73.9    74.4    66.8 

Accrued Revenue

   36.0    39.2    53.3    40.2    45.1    54.7 

Exchange Gas Receivable

   10.1    9.5    5.8    0.4    0.2    8.1 

Gas Inventory

   0.5    0.4    0.8 

Materials and Supplies

   7.2    7.3    6.9    7.8    7.8    7.0 

Prepayments and Other

   8.7    9.3    9.0    6.8    7.1    7.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Current Assets

   120.6    122.0    151.3    133.9    144.5    152.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Utility Plant:

            

Gas

   712.7    646.7    699.6    778.6    706.7    760.6 

Electric

   485.6    454.6    476.7    511.3    478.8    500.1 

Common

   82.1    36.0    67.4    61.1    69.1    83.1 

Construction Work in Progress

   68.4    113.0    35.5    26.1    32.1    25.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Utility Plant

   1,348.8    1,250.3    1,279.2    1,377.1    1,286.7    1,369.3 

Less: Accumulated Depreciation

   326.5    303.6    307.7    339.3    314.3    332.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net Utility Plant

   1,022.3    946.7    971.5    1,037.8    972.4    1,036.8 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Other Noncurrent Assets:

            

Regulatory Assets

   111.6    102.0    109.6    97.9    111.2    99.0 

Operating Lease Right of Use Assets

   3.9    —      —   

Other Assets

   10.0    9.2    9.5    16.7    16.2    10.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Other Noncurrent Assets

   121.6    111.2    119.1    118.5    127.4    109.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $1,264.5   $1,179.9   $1,241.9   $1,290.2   $1,244.3   $1,298.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated unaudited financial statements.)

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Cont.)

(Millions, except number of shares)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION:

            

Current Liabilities:

            

Accounts Payable

  $27.4   $24.1   $41.5   $33.0   $30.1   $42.6 

Short-Term Debt

   69.1    111.9    38.3    65.8    45.3    82.8 

Long-Term Debt, Current Portion

   31.8    29.8    29.8    19.5    29.8    18.4 

Regulatory Liabilities

   12.2    15.0    9.2    15.0    10.9    11.5 

Energy Supply Obligations

   15.0    12.9    9.7    4.6    7.8    13.4 

Capital Lease Obligations

   3.1    3.1    3.1 

Interest Payable

   7.0    6.9    4.3 

Other Current Liabilities

   21.9    19.5    19.4    19.9    15.5    19.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

   180.5    216.3    151.0    164.8    146.3    192.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Noncurrent Liabilities:

            

Retirement Benefit Obligations

   142.4    155.0    150.1    122.9    151.6    121.5 

Deferred Income Taxes, net

   86.4    109.2    82.9 

Deferred Income Taxes, Net

   103.8    87.0    97.8 

Cost of Removal Obligations

   91.2    84.8    84.3    93.7    86.6    90.7 

Regulatory Liabilities

   47.9    —      48.9    47.4    49.1    47.0 

Capital Lease Obligations

   3.4    6.4    5.7 

Other Noncurrent Liabilities

   6.6    6.3    5.9    10.7    12.1    10.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Noncurrent Liabilities

   377.9    361.7    377.8    378.5    386.4    367.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
            

Capitalization:

            

Long-Term Debt, Less Current Portion

   361.1    303.6    376.3    373.0    363.0    387.4 

Stockholders’ Equity:

            

Common Equity (Authorized: 25,000,000 and Outstanding: 14,872,011, 14,119,893 and 14,815,585 Shares)

   278.3    243.4    275.8 

Common Equity (Authorized: 25,000,000 and Outstanding:14,916,044, 14,860,123 and 14,876,955 Shares)

   280.7    277.4    279.1 

Retained Earnings

   66.5    54.7    60.8    93.0    71.0    72.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Common Stock Equity

   344.8    298.1    336.6    373.7    348.4    351.1 

Preferred Stock

   0.2    0.2    0.2    0.2    0.2    0.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Equity

   345.0    298.3    336.8    373.9    348.6    351.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Capitalization

   706.1    601.9    713.1    746.9    711.6    738.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6 & 7)

            

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION

  $1,264.5   $1,179.9   $1,241.9   $1,290.2   $1,244.3   $1,298.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated unaudited financial statements.)

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Millions)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  Nine Months  Ended
September 30,
   Three Months Ended
March  31,
 
  2018 2017   2019 2018 

Operating Activities:

      

Net Income

  $22.0  $17.8   $26.5  $15.6 

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash

      

Provided by Operating Activities:

      

Depreciation and Amortization

   37.4   35.2    13.8   12.3 

Deferred Tax Provision

   4.6   11.2    8.2   4.7 

Gain on Divestiture, Net (See Note 1)

   (13.4  —   

Changes in Working Capital Items:

      

Accounts Receivable

   15.1   7.1    (7.1  (7.0

Accrued Revenue

   17.3   10.3    14.5   8.2 

Exchange Gas Receivable

   (4.3  (1.2   7.7   5.6 

Regulatory Liabilities

   3.0   4.6    3.5   1.7 

Accounts Payable

   (14.1  (8.3   (9.6  (11.4

Other Changes in Working Capital Items

   3.7   (2.6   0.3   3.6 

Deferred Regulatory and Other Charges

   (5.7  (5.1   (6.9  (7.9

Other, net

   (9.0  5.7 

Other, Net

   0.3   3.0 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

   70.0   74.7    37.8   28.4 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Investing Activities:

      

Property, Plant and Equipment Additions

   (76.3  (84.2   (10.9  (10.1

Proceeds from Divestiture, Net (See Note 1)

   13.4   —   
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash (Used in) Investing Activities

   (76.3  (84.2

Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

   2.5   (10.1
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Financing Activities:

      

Proceeds from (Repayment of) Short-Term Debt, net

   30.8   30.0 

(Repayment of) Proceeds from Short-Term Debt, Net

   (17.0  7.0 

Repayment of Long-Term Debt

   (13.5  (0.4   (13.4  (13.4

Decrease in Capital Lease Obligations

   (2.3  (1.8   (0.9  (0.8

Net Increase in Exchange Gas Financing

   4.1   1.1 

Net Decrease in Exchange Gas Financing

   (7.3  (5.4

Dividends Paid

   (16.3  (15.3   (5.5  (5.4

Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock, net

   0.9   1.0 

Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock

   0.3   0.3 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

   3.7   14.6 

Cash (Used in) Financing Activities

   (43.8  (17.7
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

   (2.6  5.1    (3.5  0.6 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

   8.9   5.8    7.8   8.9 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $6.3  $10.9   $4.3  $9.5 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

      

Interest Paid

  $15.6  $15.2   $3.6  $3.6 

Income Taxes Paid

  $0.4  $—     $—    $0.2 

Payments on Capital Leases

  $2.3  $2.5   $0.8  $0.8 

Non-cash Investing Activity:

      

Capital Expenditures Included in Accounts Payable

  $1.2  $1.8   $0.7  $0.5 

Right-of-Use Assets Obtained in Exchange for Lease Obligations

  $3.9  $—   

 

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated unaudited financial statements.)

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON STOCK EQUITY

(Millions, except number of shares)

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Common
Equity
   Retained
Earnings
  Total 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018

     

Balance at July 1, 2018

  $277.9   $69.1  $347.0 

Net Income

     2.8   2.8 

Dividends on Common Shares ($0.365 per share)

     (5.4  (5.4

Stock Compensation Plans

   0.1     0.1 

Issuance of 5,423 Common Shares

   0.3     0.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2018

  $278.3   $66.5  $344.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

     

Balance at July 1, 2017

  $242.7   $57.5  $300.2 

Net Income

     2.3   2.3 

Dividends on Common Shares ($0.36 per share)

     (5.1  (5.1

Stock Compensation Plans

   0.4     0.4 

Issuance of 6,173 Common Shares

   0.3     0.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2017

  $243.4   $54.7  $298.1 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated unaudited financial statements.)

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON STOCK EQUITY

(Millions, except number of shares and per share data)

(UNAUDITED)

   Common
Equity
   Retained
Earnings
  Total 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

     

Balance at January 1, 2018

  $275.8   $60.8  $336.6 

Net Income

     22.0   22.0 

Dividends on Common Shares ($1.095 per share)

     (16.3  (16.3

Stock Compensation Plans

   1.5     1.5 

Issuance of 19,700 Common Shares

   1.0     1.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2018

  $278.3   $66.5  $344.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

     

Balance at January 1, 2017

  $240.7   $52.2  $292.9 

Net Income

     17.8   17.8 

Dividends on Common Shares ($1.08 per share)

     (15.3  (15.3

Stock Compensation Plans

   1.7     1.7 

Issuance of 20,564 Common Shares

   1.0     1.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2017

  $243.4   $54.7  $298.1 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Common
Equity
   Retained
Earnings
  Total 

Balance at January 1, 2019

  $279.1   $72.0  $351.1 

Net Income

     26.5   26.5 

Dividends on Common Shares

     (5.5  (5.5

Stock Compensation Plans

   1.3     1.3 

Issuance of 5,939 Common Shares

   0.3     0.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2019

  $280.7   $93.0  $373.7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2018

  $275.8   $60.8  $336.6 

Net Income

     15.6   15.6 

Dividends on Common Shares

     (5.4  (5.4

Stock Compensation Plans

   1.3     1.3 

Issuance of 7,812 Common Shares

   0.3     0.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

  $277.4   $71.0  $348.4 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated unaudited financial statements.)

UNITIL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations – Unitil Corporation (Unitil or the Company) is a public utility holding company. Unitil and its subsidiaries are subject to regulation as a holding company system by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The following companies are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Unitil: Unitil Energy Systems, Inc. (Unitil Energy), Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company (Fitchburg), Northern Utilities, Inc. (Northern Utilities), Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc. (Granite State), Unitil Power Corp. (Unitil Power), Unitil Realty Corp. (Unitil Realty), Unitil Service Corp. (Unitil Service) and itsnon-regulated business unit Unitil Resources, Inc. (Unitil Resources). Usource Inc. and Usource L.L.C. are, which the Company sold in the first quarter of 2019, were wholly-owned subsidiaries of Unitil Resources.

The Company’s earnings are seasonal and are typically higher in the first and fourth quarters when customers use natural gas for heating purposes.

Unitil’s principal business is the local distribution of electricity in the southeastern seacoast and state capital regions of New Hampshire and the greater Fitchburg area of north central Massachusetts, and the local distribution of natural gas in southeastern New Hampshire, portions of southern and central Maine and in the greater Fitchburg area of north central Massachusetts. Unitil has three distribution utility subsidiaries, Unitil Energy, which operates in New Hampshire, Fitchburg, which operates in Massachusetts and Northern Utilities, which operates in New Hampshire and Maine (collectively referred to as the distribution utilities).

Granite State is a natural gas transportation pipeline, operating 86 miles of underground gas transmission pipeline primarily located in Maine and New Hampshire. Granite State provides Northern Utilities with interconnection to three major natural gas pipelines and access to domestic natural gas supplies in the south and Canadian natural gas supplies in the north. Granite State derives its revenues principally from the transportation services provided to Northern Utilities and, to a lesser extent, third-party marketers.

A fifth utility subsidiary, Unitil Power, formerly functioned as the full requirements wholesale power supply provider for Unitil Energy. In connection with the implementation of electric industry restructuring in New Hampshire, Unitil Power ceased being the wholesale supplier of Unitil Energy on May 1, 2003 and divested of its long-term power supply contracts through the sale of the entitlements to the electricity associated with various electric power supply contracts it had acquired to serve Unitil Energy’s customers.

Unitil also has three other wholly-owned subsidiaries: Unitil Service; Unitil Realty; and Unitil Resources. Unitil Service provides, at cost, a variety of administrative and professional services, including regulatory, financial, accounting, human resources, engineering, operations, technology, energy management and management services on a centralized basis to its affiliated Unitil companies. Unitil Realty owns and manages the Company’s corporate office in Hampton, New Hampshire and leases this facility to Unitil Service under a long-term lease arrangement. Unitil Resources is the Company’s wholly-ownednon-regulated subsidiary. Usource, Inc. and Usource L.L.C. (collectively, Usource) are, which the Company divested of in the first quarter of 2019, were wholly-owned subsidiaries of Unitil Resources. Usource providesprovided brokering and advisory services to large commercial and industrial customers in the northeastern United States. See additional discussion of the divestiture of Usource below.

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of Unitil have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form10-Q and include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature.included. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018.2019. For further information, please refer to Note 1 of Part II to the Consolidated Financial Statements – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Company’s Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 1, 2018,January 31, 2019, for a description of the Company’s Basis of Presentation.

Divestiture ofNon-Regulated Business Subsidiary –On March 1, 2019, the Company divested of itsnon-regulated energy brokering and advisory business subsidiary, Usource. The Company recognized anafter-tax net gain of approximately $9.8 million on this divestiture in the first quarter of 2019. Thepre-tax net gain of approximately $13.4 million on this divestiture is included in Other Income (Expense), Net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019, while the income taxes associated with this transaction of $3.6 million are included in the Provision For Income Taxes.

Utility Revenue Recognition - Gas Operating Revenues and Electric Operating Revenues consist of billed and unbilled revenue and revenue from rate adjustment mechanisms. Billed and unbilled revenue includes delivery revenue and pass-through revenue, recognized according to tariffs approved by federal and state regulatory commissions which determine the amount of revenue the Company will record for these items. Revenue from rate adjustment mechanisms is accrued revenue, recognized in connection with rate adjustment mechanisms, and authorized by regulators for recognition in the current period for future cash recoveries from, or credits to, customers.

Billed and unbilled revenue is recorded when service is rendered or energy is delivered to customers. However, the determination of energy sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which occurs on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each calendar month, amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenues are calculated. These unbilled revenues are calculated each month based on estimated customer usage by class and applicable customer rates and are then reversed in the following month when billed to customers.

In the first quarter of 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU)2014-09, and its subsequent clarifications and amendments outlined in ASU2015-14, ASU2016-08, ASU2016-10 and ASU2017-13, on a modified retrospective basis, which requires application to contracts with customers effective January 1, 2018, with the cumulative impact on contracts not yet completed as of December 31, 2017 recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of Retained Earnings on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. There was no cumulative effect of adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of Retained Earnings on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements as of the adoption date or for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. A majority of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers continues to be recognized on a monthly basis based on applicable tariffs and customer monthly consumption. Such revenue is recognized using the invoice practical expedient which allows an entity to recognize revenue in the amount that directly corresponds to the value transferred to the customer.

As discussed below, the Company plans to disclose billed and unbilled revenue separately from rate adjustment mechanism revenue in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for periods in 2018 going forward, and will also provide this disclosure for prior periods for informational purposes.

The Company’s billed and unbilled revenue meets the definition of “revenues from contracts with customers” as defined in ASU2014-09. Revenue recognized in connection with rate adjustment mechanisms is consistent with the definition of alternative revenue programs in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)980-605-25-3, as the Company has the ability to adjust rates in the future as a result of past activities or completed events. ASU2014-09 requires the Company to disclose separately the amount of revenues from contracts with customers and alternative revenue program revenues.

In the following tables, revenue is classified by the types of goods/services rendered and market/customer type. The lower revenues reported in the three and nine months ended 2018 to account for the reduction in the corporate income tax rate under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) are shown separately in the tables below for informational purposes.

 

  Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 

Gas and Electric Operating Revenues ($ millions):

  Gas Electric Total 

Billed and Unbilled Revenue:

    

Residential

  $6.6  $33.6  $40.2 

C&I

   11.9   25.3   37.2 

Other

   1.5   2.6   4.1 

Revenue Reductions – TCJA

   (0.4  (0.6  (1.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Billed and Unbilled Revenue

   19.6   60.9   80.5 

Rate Adjustment Mechanism Revenue

   6.1   0.5   6.6 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Gas and Electric Operating Revenues

  $25.7  $61.4  $87.1 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  Three Months Ended September 30, 2017       Three Months Ended March 31, 2019       

Gas and Electric Operating Revenues ($ millions):

  Gas Electric Total   Gas Electric   Total 

Billed and Unbilled Revenue:

         

Residential

  $6.8  $29.9  $36.7   $38.7  $35.7   $74.4 

C&I

   11.5   24.3   35.8    54.0   24.7    78.7 

Other

   1.5   1.3   2.8    6.5   2.3    8.8 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total Billed and Unbilled Revenue

   19.8   55.5   75.3    99.2   62.7    161.9 

Rate Adjustment Mechanism Revenue

   5.3   2.0   7.3    (12.8  2.1    (10.7
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total Gas and Electric Operating Revenues

  $25.1  $57.5  $82.6   $86.4  $64.8   $151.2 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 

Gas and Electric Operating Revenues ($ millions):

  Gas Electric Total 

Billed and Unbilled Revenue:

    

Residential

  $58.3  $95.6  $153.9 

C&I

   84.7   74.1   158.8 

Other

   11.0   8.6   19.6 

Revenue Reductions – TCJA

   (2.9  (2.1  (5.0
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Billed and Unbilled Revenue

   151.1   176.2   327.3 

Rate Adjustment Mechanism Revenue

   (3.7  (8.6  (12.3
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Gas and Electric Operating Revenues

  $147.4  $167.6  $315.0 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

      Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017            Three Months Ended March 31, 2018       

Gas and Electric Operating Revenues ($ millions):

  Gas Electric   Total   Gas Electric Total 

Billed and Unbilled Revenue:

         

Residential

  $52.7  $80.9   $133.6   $35.8  $34.4  $70.2 

C&I

   73.7   65.0    138.7    50.6   24.1   74.7 

Other

   9.0   4.3    13.3    5.0   3.1   8.1 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Billed and Unbilled Revenue

   135.4   150.2    285.6    91.4   61.6   153.0 

Rate Adjustment Mechanism Revenue

   (3.5  4.2    0.7    (4.4  (4.1  (8.5
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Gas and Electric Operating Revenues

  $131.9  $154.4   $286.3   $87.0  $57.5  $144.5 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fitchburg is subject to revenue decoupling. Revenue decoupling is the term given to the elimination of the dependency of a utility’s distribution revenue on the volume of electricity or natural gas sales. The difference between distribution revenue amounts billed to customers and the targeted revenue decoupling amounts is recorded as an increase or a decrease in Accrued Revenue, which forms the basis for resetting rates for future cash recoveries from, or credits to, customers. These revenue decoupling targets may be adjusted as a result of rate cases that the Company files with the MDPU. The Company estimates that revenue decoupling applies to approximately 27% and 11% of Unitil’s total annual electric and natural gas sales volumes, respectively.

Other Operating Revenue –Non-regulatedOther Operating Revenue consists solely ofrevenue from Usource, Unitil’snon-regulated subsidiary, conductswhich, as discussed previously, the Company divested of on March 1, 2019. Usource conducted its business activities as a broker of competitive energy services. Usource doesdid not take title to the electric and gas commodities which arewere the subject of the brokerage contracts. The Company recordsrecorded energy brokering revenues based upon the amount of electricity and gas delivered to customers through the end of the accounting period. Usource partnerspartnered with certain entities to facilitate these brokerage services and payspaid these entities a fee under revenue sharing agreements.

As discussed above, the Company adopted ASU2014-09 in the first quarter of 2018. There was no cumulative effect of adoption to be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of Retained Earnings on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. ASU2014-09 requires that payments made by Usource to third parties (Channel Partners) for revenue sharing agreements are recognized net, as a reduction from revenue, where those payments were previously recognized gross as an operating expense. Therefore, beginning in 2018 and going forward, payments made by Usource to Channel Partners for revenue sharing agreements are reported as “Other” in the “Operating Revenues” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, along with Usource’s revenues. Prior to the adoption of ASU2014-09, payments by Usource to third parties for revenue sharing agreements are included as “Operation and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Those Channel Partner payments were $0.3 million and $0.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Channel Partner payments were $0.8 million and $0.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

If ASU2014-09 had been in effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the result would have been corresponding reductions of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, in both “Other” in the “Operating Revenues” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and “Operation and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings as shown in the tables below.

   Three Months Ended September 30, 
   As
Reported
   If ASU2014-09
Had Been in
Effect
 

Other Operating Revenues ($ millions):

  2018   2017 

Usource Contract Revenue

  $1.4   $1.4 

Less: Revenue Sharing Payments

   0.3    0.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Other Operating Revenues

  $1.1   $1.1 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Three Months Ended September 30, 
   As
Reported
   If ASU2014-09
Had Been in
Effect
 

Operation and Maintenance Expense ($ millions):

  2018   2017 

Operation and Maintenance Expense

  $16.4   $16.6 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   As
Reported
   If ASU2014-09
Had Been in
Effect
 

Other Operating Revenues ($ millions):

  2018   2017 

Usource Contract Revenue

  $4.3   $4.5 

Less: Revenue Sharing Payments

   0.8    0.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Other Operating Revenues

  $3.5   $3.7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   As
Reported
   If ASU2014-09
Had Been in
Effect
 

Operation and Maintenance Expense ($ millions):

  2018   2017 

Operation and Maintenance Expense

  $51.5   $48.6 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retirement Benefit Costs – The Company sponsors the Unitil Corporation Retirement Plan (Pension Plan), the Unitil Employee Health and Welfare Benefits Plan (PBOP Plan) and the Unitil Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP).The net periodic benefit costs associated with these benefit plans consist of service cost and other components (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In the first quarter of 2018, the Company adopted ASUNo. 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) which amends the existing guidance relating to the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic other post-retirement benefit costs. On a retrospective basis, the amendment requires an employer to separate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and provides explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and other components in the income statement.

Accordingly, for all periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, the service cost component of the Company’s net periodic benefit costs is reported in “Operations and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings while the other components of net periodic benefit costs are reported in the “Other Expense (Income), net” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Prior to adoption, the Company reported all components of its net periodic benefit costs in “Operations and Maintenance” in the “Operating Expenses” section of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The change in presentation for three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 resulted in a reduction of “Operations and Maintenance” and an increase in “Other Expense (Income), net” on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the prior periods. There are $1.2 million and $0.9 million ofnon-service cost net periodic benefit costs reported in “Other Expense (Income), net” for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively, net of amounts deferred as regulatory assets for future recovery. There are $4.1 million and $3.6 million ofnon-service cost net periodic benefit costs reported in “Other Expense (Income), net” for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively, net of amounts deferred as regulatory assets for future recovery.

Income Taxes – The Company is subject to Federal and State income taxes as well as various other business taxes. This process involves estimating the Company’s current tax liabilities as well as assessing temporary and permanent differences resulting from the timing of the deductions of expenses and recognition of taxable income for tax and book accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company accounts for income tax assets, liabilities and expenses in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)FASB Codification guidance on Income Taxes.

The Company classifies penalty and interest expense related to income tax liabilities as income tax expense and interest expense, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Provisions for income taxes are calculated in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates for each period for which a statement of earnings is presented. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the FASB Codification guidance on Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach for the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the current and deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company’s current and deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect its best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. In accordance with the FASB Codification, the Company periodically assesses the realization of its deferred tax assets and liabilities and adjusts the income tax provision, the current tax liability and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts and circumstances which gave rise to the revision become known.

Cash and Cash Equivalents –Cash and Cash Equivalents includeincludes all cash and cash equivalents to which the Company has legal title. Cash equivalents include short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less and interest bearing deposits. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held at financial institutions and at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Under the Independent System Operator—Operator – New England(ISO-NE) Financial Assurance Policy (Policy), Unitil’s subsidiaries Unitil Energy, Fitchburg and Unitil Power are required to provide assurance of their ability to satisfy their obligations toISO-NE. Under this Policy, Unitil’s subsidiaries provide cash deposits covering approximately2-1/2 months of outstanding obligations, less credit amounts that are based on the Company’s credit rating. As of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, the Unitil subsidiaries had deposited $3.2$3.0 million, $4.8$3.3 million and $2.9$3.5 million, respectively to satisfy theirISO-NE obligations. In addition, Northern Utilities has cash margin deposits to satisfy requirements for its natural gas hedging program. There were no cash margin deposits at Northern Utilities as of September 30, 2018, September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – The Company recognizes a provision for doubtful accounts each month based upon the Company’s experience in collecting electric and gas utility service accounts receivable in prior years. At the end of each month, an analysis of the delinquent receivables is performed which takes into account an assumption about the cash recovery of delinquent receivables. The analysis also calculates the amount ofwritten-off receivables that are recoverable through regulatory rate reconciling mechanisms. The Company’s distribution utilities are authorized by regulators to recover the costs of their energy commodity portion of bad debts through rate mechanisms. Also, the electric and gas

divisions of Fitchburg are authorized to recover through rates past due amounts associated with hardship accounts that are protected fromshut-off. Evaluating the adequacy of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts requires judgment about the assumptions used in the analysis, including the level of customers enrolling in payment plans with the Company.analysis. It has been the Company’s experience that the assumptions it has used in evaluating the adequacy of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts have proven to be reasonably accurate.

The Allowance for Doubtful Accounts as of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, which isare included in Accounts Receivable, netNet on the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, was as follows:

 

($ millions)

        
  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

  $1.2   $1.5   $1.6   $1.7   $1.6   $1.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Accrued Revenue –Accrued Revenue includes the current portion of Regulatory Assets and unbilled revenues. The following table shows the components of Accrued Revenue as of September 30, 2018, September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.2018.

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 

Accrued Revenue ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Regulatory Assets – Current

  $26.4   $31.3   $39.5   $29.4   $34.6   $41.3 

Unbilled Revenues

   9.6    7.9    13.8    10.8    10.5    13.4 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Accrued Revenue

  $36.0   $39.2   $53.3   $40.2   $45.1   $54.7 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exchange Gas Receivable –Northern Utilities and Fitchburg have gas exchange and storage agreements whereby natural gas purchases during the months of April through October are delivered to a third party. The third party delivers natural gas back to the Company during the months of November through March. The exchange and storage gas volumes are recorded at weighted average cost. The following table shows the components of Exchange Gas Receivable as of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017.2018.

 

   September 30,   December 31, 

Exchange Gas Receivable ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017 

Northern Utilities

  $9.5   $8.9   $5.4 

Fitchburg

   0.6    0.6    0.4 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Exchange Gas Receivable

  $10.1   $9.5   $5.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   March 31,   December 31, 

Exchange Gas Receivable ($ millions)

  2019   2018   2018 

Northern Utilities

  $0.2   $—     $7.5 

Fitchburg

   0.2    0.2    0.6 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Exchange Gas Receivable

  $0.4   $0.2   $8.1 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gas Inventory – The Company uses the weighted average cost methodology to value natural gas inventory. The following table shows the components of gas inventoryGas Inventory as of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017 which are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Prepayments and Other.2018.

 

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 

Gas Inventory ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Natural Gas

  $0.4   $0.4   $0.4   $—     $—     $0.3 

Propane

   0.4    0.2    0.1    0.4    0.3    0.4 

Liquefied Natural Gas & Other

   0.1    0.1    0.1    0.1    0.1    0.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Gas Inventory

  $0.9   $0.7   $0.6   $0.5   $0.4   $0.8 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Utility Plant – The cost of additions to Utility Plant and the cost of renewals and betterments are capitalized. Cost consists of labor, materials, services and certain indirect construction costs, including an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC). The costs of current repairs and minor replacements are charged to appropriate operating expense accounts. The original cost of utility plant retired or otherwise disposed of is charged to the accumulated provision for depreciation. The Company includes in its mass asset depreciation rates, which are periodically reviewed as part of its ratemaking proceedings, cost of removal amounts to provide for future negative salvage value. At September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, the Company estimates that the cost of removal amounts, which are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Cost of Removal Obligations are $91.2$93.7 million, $84.8$86.6 million, and $84.3$90.7 million, respectively.

Leases –On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASUNo. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new standard requires lessees to record assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allows the Company to carryforward the historical lease classification. The Company also elected the practical expedient related to land easements, allowing the Company to carry forward its current accounting treatment for land easements on existing agreements. The Company made an accounting policy election to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the balance sheet. The Company recognizes those lease payments in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The adoption of the standard resulted in recognition of approximately $4.2 million of lease assets and lease liabilities as of January 1, 2019 on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s adoption of the standard did not have a material effect on its Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. See additional discussion below in the “Leases” section of Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Regulatory Accounting – The Company’s principal business is the distribution of electricity and natural gas by the three distribution utilities: Unitil Energy, Fitchburg and Northern Utilities. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg are subject to regulation by the FERC. Fitchburg is also regulated by the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (MDPU), Unitil Energy is regulated by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) and Northern Utilities is regulated by the Maine Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) and NHPUC. Granite State, the Company’s natural gas transmission pipeline, is regulated by the FERC. Accordingly, the Company uses the Regulated Operations guidance as set forth in the FASB Codification. The Company has recorded Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities which will be recovered from customers, or applied for customer benefit, in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable public utility regulatory commission.

 

   September 30,   December 31, 

Regulatory Assets consist of the following ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017 

Retirement Benefits

  $88.0   $76.2   $84.5 

Energy Supply & Other Rate Adjustment Mechanisms

   24.8    28.2    36.0 

Deferred Storm Charges

   6.3    6.8    7.2 

Environmental

   8.9    9.9    9.5 

Income Taxes

   5.9    6.7    6.5 

Other

   4.1    5.5    5.4 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Regulatory Assets

   138.0    133.3    149.1 

Less: Current Portion of Regulatory Assets(1)

   26.4    31.3    39.5 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Regulatory Assets – noncurrent

  $111.6   $102.0   $109.6 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)
   March 31,   December 31, 

Regulatory Assets consist of the following ($ millions)

  2019   2018   2018 

Retirement Benefits

  $72.4   $85.4   $72.0 

Energy Supply & Other Rate Adjustment Mechanisms

   25.1    31.9    38.4 

Deferred Storm Charges

   5.9    8.0    6.3 

Environmental

   7.6    9.0    7.9 

Income Taxes

   4.7    6.3    5.7 

Other Deferred Charges

   11.6    5.2    10.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Regulatory Assets

   127.3    145.8    140.3 

Less: Current Portion of Regulatory Assets(1)

   29.4    34.6    41.3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Regulatory Assets – noncurrent

  $97.9   $111.2   $99.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reflects amounts included in Accrued Revenue, discussed above, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 

Regulatory Liabilities consist of the following ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Rate Adjustment Mechanisms

  $12.2   $11.6   $6.9 

Income Taxes (Note 8)

  $48.2   $49.1   $47.0 

Energy Supply & Other Rate Adjustment Mechanisms

   13.6    10.3    11.5 

Gas Pipeline Refund (Note 6)

   —      3.4    2.3    —      0.6    —   

Income Taxes (Note 8)

   47.9    —      48.9 

Other

   0.6    —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

��

 

Total Regulatory Liabilities

   60.1    15.0    58.1    62.4    60.0    58.5 

Less: Current Portion of Regulatory Liabilities

   12.2    15.0    9.2    15.0    10.9    11.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Regulatory Liabilities – noncurrent

  $47.9   $—     $48.9   $47.4   $49.1   $47.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Generally, the Company receives a return on investment on its regulated assets for which a cash outflow has been made. Included in Regulatory Assets as of September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 are $6.1$5.9 million of environmental costs, rate case costs and other expenditures to be recovered over varying periods in the next seven years. Regulators have authorized recovery of these expenditures, but without a return. Regulatory commissions can reach different conclusions about the recovery of costs, which can have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company believes it is probable that its regulated distribution and transmission utilities will recover their investments in long-lived assets, including regulatory assets. If the Company, or a portion of its assets or operations, were to cease meeting the criteria for application of these accounting rules, accounting standards for businesses in general would become applicable and immediate recognition of any previously deferred costs, or a portion of deferred costs, would be required in the year in which the criteria are no longer met, if such deferred costs were not recoverable in the portion of the business that continues to meet the criteria for application of the FASB Codification topic on Regulated Operations. If unable to continue to apply the FASB Codification provisions for Regulated Operations, the Company would be required to apply the provisions for the Discontinuation of Rate-Regulated Accounting included in the FASB Codification. In the Company’s opinion, its regulated operations will be subject to the FASB Codification provisions for Regulated Operations for the foreseeable future.

Derivatives – The Company’s regulated energy subsidiaries enter into energy supply contracts to serve their electric and gas customers. The Company follows a procedure for determining whether each contract qualifies as a derivative instrument under the guidance provided by the FASB Codification on Derivatives and Hedging. For each contract, the Company reviews and documents the key terms of the contract. Based on those terms and any additional relevant components of the contract, the Company determines and documents whether the contract qualifies as a derivative instrument as defined in the FASB Codification. The Company has determined that none of its energy supply contracts other than the regulatory approved hedging program, described below, qualifiesqualify as a derivative instrument under the guidance set forth in the FASB Codification.

The Company has a regulatory approved hedging program for Northern Utilities designed to fix or cap a portion of its gas supply costs for the coming years of service. Under the program, the Company may purchase call option contracts on NYMEX natural gas futures contracts for future winter period months.

Any gains or losses resulting from the change in the fair value of these derivatives are passed through to ratepayers directly through Northern Utilities’ Cost of Gas Clause. The fair value of these derivatives is determined using Level 2 inputs (valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly), specifically based on the NYMEX closing prices for outstanding contracts as of the balance sheet date. As a result of the ratemaking process, the Company records gains and losses resulting from the change in fair value of the derivatives as regulatory liabilities or assets, then reclassifies these gains or losses into Cost of Gas Sales when the gains and losses are passed through to customers through the Cost of Gas Clause.

As of September 30, 2018, September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017 the Company had zero, 1.2 billion and 0.6 billion cubic feet (BCF), respectively, outstanding in natural gas futures and options contracts under its hedging program.

As of September 30, 2018, September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC815-20 have a fair value of $0, $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively.

Investments in Marketable SecuritiesIn 2015, theThe Company establishedhas a trust through which it invests in a variety of equity and fixed income mutual funds. These funds are intended to satisfy obligations under the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)(SERP) (See further discussion of the SERP in Note 9.

At September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, the fair value of the Company’s investments in these trading securities, which are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other Assets, were $5.3$5.1 million, $3.4 million$5.1 and $3.6$4.8 million, respectively, as shown in the table below. These investments are valued based on quoted prices from active markets and are categorized in Level 1 as they are actively traded and no valuation adjustments have been applied. Changes in the fair value of these investments are recorded in Other Expense, net.Net.

   March 31,   December 31, 

Fair Value of Marketable Securities ($ millions)

  2019   2018   2018 

Equity Funds

  $—     $1.9   $—   

Fixed Income Funds

   —      1.6    —   

Money Market Funds

   5.1    1.6    4.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Marketable Securities

  $5.1   $5.1   $4.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company also sponsors the Unitil Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DC Plan”). The DC Plan is anon-qualified deferred compensation plan that provides a vehicle for participants to accumulatetax-deferred savings to supplement retirement income. The DC Plan, which was effective January 1, 2019, is open to senior management or other highly compensated employees as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, and may also be used for recruitment and retention purposes for newly hired senior executives. The DC Plan design mirrors the Company’s Tax Deferred Savings and Investment Plan formula, but provides for contributions on compensation above the IRS limit, which will allow participants to defer up to 85% of base salary, and up to 85% of any cash incentive for retirement. The Company may also elect to make discretionary contributions on behalf of any participant in an amount determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. A trust has been established to invest the funds associated with the DC Plan.

At March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2018, the fair value of the Company’s investments in these trading securities related to the DC Plan, which are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other Assets, were $0.1 million, $0 and $0, respectively, as shown in the table below. These investments are valued based on quoted prices from active markets and are categorized in Level 1 as they are actively traded and no valuation adjustments have been applied. Changes in the fair value of these investments are recorded in Other Expense, Net.

 

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 

Fair Value of Marketable Securities ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Equity Funds

  $3.0   $1.9   $2.1   $—     $—     $—   

Fixed Income Funds

   2.3    1.5    1.5 

Money Market Funds

   0.1    —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Marketable Securities

  $5.3   $3.4   $3.6   $0.1   $—     $—   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Energy Supply Obligations –The following discussion and table summarize the nature and amounts of the items recorded as current and noncurrent Energy Supply Obligations on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The noncurrent portion of Energy Supply Obligations is recorded in(current portion) and Other Noncurrent Liabilities (noncurrent portion) on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 

Energy Supply Obligations ($ millions)

  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Current:

            

Exchange Gas Obligation

  $9.5   $8.9   $5.4   $0.2   $—     $7.5 

Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards

   5.2    3.7    4.0    4.1    7.5    5.6 

Power Supply Contract Divestitures

   0.3    0.3    0.3    0.3    0.3    0.3 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Energy Supply Obligations – Current

   15.0    12.9    9.7    4.6    7.8    13.4 

Noncurrent:

      

Long-Term:

      

Power Supply Contract Divestitures

   0.7    1.0    0.9    0.5    0.8    0.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Energy Supply Obligations

  $15.7   $13.9   $10.6   $5.1   $8.6   $14.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Exchange Gas Obligation As discussed above, Northern Utilities enters into gas exchange agreements under which Northern Utilities releases certain natural gas pipeline and storage assets, resells the natural gas storage inventory to an asset manager and subsequently repurchases the inventory over the course of the natural gas heating season at the same price at which it sold the natural gas inventory to the asset manager. The gas inventory related to these agreements is recorded in Exchange Gas Receivable on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets while the corresponding obligations are recorded in Energy Supply Obligations.

Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards – Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) require retail electricity suppliers, including public utilities, to demonstrate that required percentages of their sales are met with power generated from certain types of resources or technologies. Compliance is demonstrated by purchasing and retiring Renewable Energy Certificates (REC) generated by facilities approved by the state as qualifying for REC treatment. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg purchase RECs in compliance with RPS legislation in New Hampshire and Massachusetts for supply provided to default service customers. RPS compliance costs are a supply cost that is recovered in customer default service rates. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg collect RPS compliance costs from customers throughout the year and demonstrate compliance for each calendar year on the following July 1. Due to timing differences between collection of revenue from customers and payment of REC costs to suppliers, Unitil Energy and Fitchburg typically maintain accrued revenue for RPS compliance which is recorded in Accrued Revenue with a corresponding liability in Energy Supply Obligations on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Fitchburg has entered into long-term renewable contracts for electricthe purchase of clean energy and/or renewable energy creditscertificates (RECs) pursuant to Massachusetts legislation, specifically, theAn Act Relative to Green Communities of 2008 and the(“Green Communities Act”, 2008), An Act Relative to Competitively Priced Electricity (2012) in the Commonwealth (2012) and the MDPU’s regulations implementing the legislation.An Act to Promote Energy Diversity (“Energy Diversity Act”, 2016). The generating facilities associated with threefour of these contracts have been constructed and are now operating. A recent round of long-term renewable energySince 2017, the Company has participated in two major statewide procurements was conducted during 2016which resulted in contracts for imported hydroelectric power and severalassociated transmission and for offshore wind generation. The contracts were finalized and submitted to thefiled with MDPU in September, 2017 for approval. 2018 and approvals remain pending.

Additional procurements have been issuedlong-term clean energy contracts are expected in compliance with the Energy Diversity Act and An Act to Promote a Clean Energy Diversity (2016)Future (2018). Fitchburg recovers the costs associated with long-term renewable contracts on a fully reconciling basis through a MDPU-approved cost recovery mechanism.

Power Supply Contract Divestitures – As a result of the restructuring of the utility industry in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, Unitil Energy’s and Fitchburg’s customers have the opportunityare entitled to purchase their electric or natural gas supplies from third-party suppliers. In connection with the implementation of retail choice, Unitil Power, which formerly functioned as the wholesale power supply provider for Unitil Energy, and Fitchburg divested their long-term power supply contracts through the sale of the entitlements to the electricity sold under those contracts. Unitil Energy and Fitchburg recover in their rates all the costs associated with the divestiture of their power supply portfolios and have secured regulatory approval from the NHPUC and MDPU, respectively, for the recovery of power supply-related stranded costs. The obligations related to these divestitures are recorded in Energy Supply Obligations (current portion) and Other Noncurrent Liabilities (noncurrent portion) on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets with corresponding regulatory assets recorded in Accrued Revenue (current portion) and Regulatory Assets (long-term(noncurrent portion).

Recently Issued Pronouncements –In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)No. 2018-14, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Sutopic715-20)” which amends existing guidance to add, remove and clarify disclosure requirements related to defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The ASU is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt this ASU in the first quarter of 2020 and does not expect that it will have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-07, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)” which amends the existing guidance relating to the accounting for nonemployee share-based payments. Under this ASU, most of the guidance on share-based payments to nonemployees will be aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU in the second quarter of 2018 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)” which amends the existing guidance relating to the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic other post-retirement benefit costs. On a retrospective basis, the amendment requires an employer to separate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and provides explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and other components in the income statement. In addition, on a prospective basis, the ASU limits the component of net benefit cost eligible to be capitalized to service costs. The ASU became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The change in capitalization of retirement benefits did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new standard requires lessees to record assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The Company plans to adoptadopted the standard as of January 1, 2019. The Company will elect the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allows the Company to carryforward the historical lease classification. The Company will also elect the practical expedient related to land easements, allowing the Company to carry forward its current accounting treatment for land easements on existing agreements. The Company will make an accounting policy election to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the balance sheet. The Company will recognize those lease paymentsSee “Leases” above in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company expects that adoption of the standard will result in recognition of additional net lease assets and lease liabilities as of January 1, 2019. The Company does not believe the standard will have a material effect on its Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, which amends existing revenue recognition guidance, effective January 1, 2018. The objective of the new standard is to provide a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets and to provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved and expanded disclosure requirements.

The majority of the Company’s revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide natural gas or electricity without a defined contractual term. For such arrangements, the Company generally expects that the revenue from contracts with these customers will continue to be equivalent to the electricity or natural gas supplied and billed in that period (including unbilled revenues) and the adoption of the new guidance will not result in a significant shift in the timing of revenue recognition for such sales.

The Company used the modified retrospective method when adopting the new standard on January 1, 2018. The new guidance did not have a material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (See “Utility Revenue Recognition” and “Other Operating Revenue –Non-regulated” above.)

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)2016-01 which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. A financial instrument is defined as cash, evidence of ownership interest in a company or other entity, or a contract that both: (i) imposes on one entity a contractual obligation either to deliver cash or another financial instrument to a second entity or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially unfavorable terms with the second entity and (ii) conveys to that second entity a contractual right either to receive cash or another financial instruments from the first entity or to exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the first entity. The ASU became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.Note 1.

Other than the pronouncementspronouncement discussed above, there are no recently issued pronouncements that the Company has not already adopted or that have a material impact on the Company.

Subsequent Events – The Company has evaluatedevaluates all events or transactions through the date of thisthe related filing. During the period through the date of this periodfiling, the Company did not have any material subsequent events that impactedwould result in adjustment to or disclosure in its unaudited consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 2 – DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE

 

Declaration

Date

  Date
Paid
(Payable)
  Shareholder of
Record Date
  Dividend
Amount

04/24/19

05/29/1905/15/19$ 0.370

01/30/19

02/28/1902/14/19$ 0.370

10/24/18

  11/29/18  11/15/18  $0.365

07/25/18

  08/29/18  08/15/18  $0.365

04/25/18

  05/29/18  05/15/18  $0.365

01/30/18

  02/28/18  02/14/18  $0.365

10/25/17

11/29/1711/15/17$0.360

07/26/17

08/29/1708/15/17$0.360

04/26/17

05/30/1705/16/17$0.360

01/25/17

02/28/1702/14/17$0.360

NOTE 3 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following table provides significant segment financial data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and September 30, 2017 and as of DecemberMarch 31, 2017 (millions):2018:

 

  Gas Electric Non-
Regulated
   Other Total   Gas Electric Non-
Regulated
   Other Total 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018

              

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 ($ millions)

              

Revenues:

              

Billed and Unbilled Revenue

  $19.6  $60.9  $—     $—    $80.5   $99.2  $62.7  $—     $—    $161.9 

Rate Adjustment Mechanism Revenue

   6.1   0.5   —      —     6.6    (12.8  2.1   —      —     (10.7

Other Operating Revenue –Non-Regulated

   —     —     1.1    —     1.1    —     —     0.9    —     0.9 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Operating Revenues

  $25.7  $61.4  $1.1   $—    $88.2   $86.4  $64.8  $0.9   $—    $152.1 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Segment Profit (Loss)

   (3.2  4.5   0.3    1.2   2.8    13.7   1.9   10.1    0.8   26.5 

Identifiable Segment Assets

   771.6   502.3   0.1    16.2   1,290.2 

Capital Expenditures

   30.9   7.2   —      1.0   39.1    3.3   6.6   —      1.0   10.9 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

              

Revenues

  $25.1  $57.5  $1.4   $—    $84.0 

Segment Profit (Loss)

   (2.1  4.1   0.3    —     2.3 

Capital Expenditures

   26.0   10.0   —      3.3   39.3 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

              

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 ($ millions)

              

Revenues:

              

Billed and Unbilled Revenue

  $151.1  $176.2  $—     $—    $327.3   $91.4  $61.6  $—     $—    $153.0 

Rate Adjustment Mechanism Revenue

   (3.7  (8.6  —      —     (12.3   (4.4  (4.1  —      —     (8.5

Other Operating Revenue –Non-Regulated

   —     —     3.5    —     3.5    —     —     1.3    —     1.3 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total Operating Revenues

  $147.4  $167.6  $3.5   $—    $318.5   $87.0  $57.5  $1.3   $—    $ 145.8 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Segment Profit

   9.1   10.2   0.9    1.8   22.0 

Segment Profit (Loss)

   12.6   3.0   0.4    (0.4  15.6 

Identifiable Segment Assets

   712.6   481.8   7.1    42.8   1,244.3 

Capital Expenditures

   53.1   20.8   —      2.4   76.3    3.6   6.0   —      0.5   10.1 

Segment Assets

   730.0   485.7   6.6    42.2   1,264.5 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

              

Revenues

  $131.9  $154.4  $4.5   $—    $290.8 

Segment Profit

   7.9   9.3   0.8    (0.2  17.8 

Capital Expenditures

   48.7   23.8   —      11.7   84.2 

Segment Assets

   661.2   461.2   7.3    50.2   1,179.9 

As of December 31, 2017

              

Segment Assets

  $714.3  $476.9  $6.7   $44.0  $1,241.9 

NOTE 4 – DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

Details on long-term debt at September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 20172018 are shown below:

 

($ millions)

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Unitil Corporation:

            

6.33% Senior Notes, Due May 1, 2022

  $20.0   $20.0   $20.0   $20.0   $20.0   $20.0 

3.70% Senior Notes, Due August 1, 2026

   30.0    30.0    30.0    30.0    30.0    30.0 

Unitil Energy First Mortgage Bonds:

            

5.24% Senior Secured Notes, Due March 2, 2020

   10.0    15.0    15.0    5.0    10.0    10.0 

8.49% Senior Secured Notes, Due October 14, 2024

   7.5    9.0    7.5    6.0    7.5    6.0 

6.96% Senior Secured Notes, Due September 1, 2028

   20.0    20.0    20.0    20.0    20.0    20.0 

8.00% Senior Secured Notes, Due May 1, 2031

   15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0 

6.32% Senior Secured Notes, Due September 15, 2036

   15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0 

4.18% Senior Secured Notes, Due November 30, 2048

   30.0    —      30.0 

Fitchburg:

            

6.75% Senior Notes, Due November 30, 2023

   7.6    9.5    7.6    5.7    7.6    5.7 

6.79% Senior Notes, Due October 15, 2025

   10.0    10.0    10.0    10.0    10.0    10.0 

3.52% Senior Notes, Due November 1, 2027

   10.0    —      10.0    10.0    10.0    10.0 

7.37% Notes, Due January 15, 2029

   12.0    12.0    12.0 

5.90% Notes, Due December 15, 2030

   15.0    15.0    15.0 

7.98% Notes, Due June 1, 2031

   14.0    14.0    14.0 

7.37% Senior Notes, Due January 15, 2029

   12.0    12.0    12.0 

5.90% Senior Notes, Due December 15, 2030

   15.0    15.0    15.0 

7.98% Senior Notes, Due June 1, 2031

   14.0    14.0    14.0 

4.32% Senior Notes, Due November 1, 2047

   15.0    —      15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0 

Northern Utilities:

            

6.95% Senior Notes, Due December 3, 2018

   10.0    20.0    10.0    —      10.0    —   

5.29% Senior Notes, Due March 2, 2020

   16.6    25.0    25.0    8.2    16.6    16.6 

3.52% Senior Notes, Due November 1, 2027

   20.0    —      20.0    20.0    20.0    20.0 

7.72% Senior Notes, Due December 3, 2038

   50.0    50.0    50.0    50.0    50.0    50.0 

4.42% Senior Notes, Due October 15, 2044

   50.0    50.0    50.0    50.0    50.0    50.0 

4.32% Senior Notes, Due November 1, 2047

   30.0    —      30.0    30.0    30.0    30.0 

Granite State Senior Notes:

      

Granite State:

      

7.15% Senior Notes, Due December 15, 2018

   3.3    6.7    3.3    —      3.3    —   

3.72% Senior Notes, Due November 1, 2027

   15.0    —      15.0    15.0    15.0    15.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Long-Term Debt

   396.0    336.2    409.4    395.9    396.0    409.3 

Less: Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs

   3.1    2.8    3.3    3.4    3.2    3.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Long-Term Debt, net of Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs

   392.9    333.4    406.1    392.5    392.8    405.8 

Less: Current Portion

   31.8    29.8    29.8    19.5    29.8    18.4 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Long-term Debt, Less Current Portion

  $361.1   $303.6   $376.3   $373.0   $363.0   $387.4 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fair Value of Long-Term DebtCurrently, the Company believes that there is no active market in the Company’s debt securities, which have all been sold through private placements. If there were an active market for the Company’s debt securities, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt would be estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues, or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated using Level 2 inputs (valuations based on quoted prices available in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable, and inputs derived principally from market data.) In estimating the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, the assumed market yield reflects the Moody’s Baa Utility Bond Average Yield. Costs, including prepayment costs, associated with the early settlement of long-term debt are not taken into consideration in determining fair value.

 

($ millions)

  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Estimated Fair Value of Long-Term Debt

  $418.7   $383.0   $457.1   $418.0   $428.0   $422.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Credit Arrangements

On July 25, 2018, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and related documents (collectively, the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lenders, which amended and restated in its entirety the Company’s prior credit facility. The Credit Facility extends to July 25, 2023, subject to twoone-year extensions under certain circumstances, and has a borrowing limit of $120 million, which includes a $25 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility provides the Company with the ability to elect that borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest under several options, including at a daily fluctuating rate of interest per annum equal toone-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.125%. The Company may increase the borrowing limit under the Credit Facility by up to $50 million under certain circumstances.

The Company utilizes the Credit Facility for cash management purposes related to its short-term operating activities. Total gross borrowings were $202.5$75.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. Total gross repayments were $171.7$92.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. The following table details the borrowing limits, amounts outstanding and amounts available under the Credit Facility as of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017:2018:

 

  Credit Facility ($ millions)   Revolving Credit Facility
($ millions)
 
  September 30,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
  2018   2017   2017   2019   2018   2018 

Limit

  $120.0   $120.0   $120.0   $120.0   $120.0   $120.0 

Short-Term Borrowings Outstanding

   69.1    111.9    38.3   $65.8   $45.3   $82.8 

Letters of Credit Outstanding

   —      1.1    —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Available

  $50.9   $7.0   $81.7   $54.2   $74.7   $37.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Credit Facility contains customary terms and conditions for credit facilities of this type, including affirmative and negative covenants. There are restrictions on, among other things, the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to permit liens or incur indebtedness, and restrictions on the Company’s ability to merge or consolidate with another entity or change its line of business. The affirmative and negative covenants under the Credit Facility shall apply until the Credit

Facility terminates and all amounts

borrowed under the Credit Facility are paid in full (or with respect to letters of credit, they are cash collateralized). The only financial covenant in the Credit Facility provides that Funded Debt to Capitalization (as each term is defined in the Credit Facility) cannot exceed 65%, tested on a quarterly basis. At September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, the Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in the Credit Facility in effect on that date. (See also “Credit Arrangements” in Note 4.)

The Company believes the future operating cash flows of the Company, along with its existing borrowing availability and access to financial markets for the issuance of new long-term debt, will be sufficient to meet any working capital and future operating requirements, and capital investment forecast opportunities.

The weighted average interest rates on all short-term borrowings and intercompany money pool transactions were 3.2%3.7% and 2.3%2.9% for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, and September 30, 2017, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on all short-term borrowings for the twelve months ended December 31, 20172018 was 2.4%3.3%.

As discussed previously, the Company divested of itsnon-regulated subsidiary business, Usource, in the first quarter of 2019. The Company used the net proceeds of $9.8 million from this divestiture for general corporate purposes.

On November 1, 2017, Northern Utilities30, 2018 Unitil Energy issued $20 million of Notes due 2027 at 3.52% and $30 million of NotesFirst Mortgage Bonds due 2047November 30, 2048 at 4.32%4.18%. Fitchburg issued $10 million of Notes due 2027 at 3.52% and $15 million of Notes due 2047 at 4.32%. Granite State issued $15 million of Notes due 2027 at 3.72%. Northern Utilities, Fitchburg and Granite StateUnitil Energy used the net proceeds from these offerings to refinance higher cost long-term debt that matured in 2017,this offering to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes. Approximately $0.7$0.5 million of costs associated with these issuances have been netted against Long-Term Debtlong-term debt for presentation purposes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In April 2014, Unitil Service Corp. entered into a financing arrangement, structured as a capital lease obligation, for various information systems and technology equipment. Final funding under this capital lease occurred on October 30, 2015, resulting in total funding of $13.4 million. The capital lease matures on September 30, 2020. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there are $2.7$2.8 million of current and $3.0$1.6 million of noncurrent obligations under this capital lease on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Unitil Corporation and its utility subsidiaries, Fitchburg, Unitil Energy, Northern Utilities, and Granite State are currently rated “BBB+” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. Unitil Corporation and Granite State are currently rated “Baa2”, and Fitchburg, Unitil Energy and Northern Utilities are currently rated “Baa1” by Moody’s Investors Services.

Northern Utilities enters into asset management agreements under which Northern Utilities releases certain natural gas pipeline and storage assets, resells the natural gas storage inventory to an asset manager and subsequently repurchases the inventory over the course of the natural gas heating season at the same price at which it sold the natural gas inventory to the asset manager. There was $9.6$2.2 million, $9.0$1.0 million and $8.5$8.4 million of natural gas storage inventory at September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017,2018, respectively, related to these asset management agreements. The amount of natural gas inventory released in September 2018March 2019 and payable in October 2018April 2019 is $0.1$2.1 million and is recorded in Accounts Payable at September 30,March 31, 2019. The amount of natural gas inventory released in March 2018 and payable in April 2018 was $1.0 million and was recorded in Accounts Payable at March 31, 2018. The amount of natural gas inventory released in September 2017 and payable in October 2017 was $0.1 million and was recorded in Accounts Payable at September 30, 2017. The amount of natural gas inventory released in December 20172018 and payable in January 20182019 was $3.1$0.9 million and was recorded in Accounts Payable at December 31, 2017.2018.

Guarantees

The Company provides limited guarantees on certain energy and natural gas storage management contracts entered into by the distribution utilities. The Company’s policy is to limit the duration of these guarantees. As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there were approximately $5.6$4.3 million of guarantees outstanding.

Leases

Unitil’s subsidiaries and also lease some of their vehicles, machinery and office equipment under both capital and operating lease arrangements.

Total rental expense under operating leases charged to operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

The balance sheet classification of the Company’s lease obligations was as follows:

   March 31,   December 31, 

Lease Obligations ($ millions)

  2019   2018   2018 

Operating Lease Obligations:

      

Other Current Liabilities (current portion)

  $1.1   $—     $—   

Other Noncurrent Liabilities (long-term portion)

   2.8    —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Operating Lease Obligations

  $3.9   $—     $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital Lease Obligations:

      

Other Current Liabilities (current portion)

  $3.0   $3.1   $3.1 

Other Noncurrent Liabilities (long-term portion)

   1.9    4.9    2.7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Capital Lease Obligations

  $4.9   $8.0   $5.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Lease Obligations

  $8.8   $8.0   $5.8 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease obligations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $0.4 million and was included in Cash Provided by Operating Activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Assets under capital leases amounted to approximately $14.9 million, $15.0 million and $15.0 million as of March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2018, respectively, less accumulated amortization of $1.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively and are included in Net Utility Plant on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table is a schedule of future operating lease payment obligations and future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of March 31, 2019. The payments for capital leases consist of $3.0 million of current capital lease obligations, which are included in Other Current Liabilities and $1.9 million of noncurrent capital lease obligations, which are included in Other Noncurrent Liabilities, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2019. $2.8 million of the current capital lease obligations and $1.6 million of the noncurrent capital lease obligations reflect amounts under a financing arrangement entered into in April 2014 for various information systems and technology equipment. The financing arrangement is structured as a capital lease obligation.

The payments for operating leases consist of $1.1 million of current operating lease obligations, which are included in Other Current Liabilities and $2.8 million of noncurrent operating lease obligations, which are included in Other Noncurrent Liabilities, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2019.

Lease Payments ($000’s)  Operating   Capital 

Year Ending December 31,

  Leases   Leases 

Rest of 2019

  $967   $2,369 

2020

   1,141    2,576 

2021

   972    96 

2022

   691    33 

2023

   391    15 

2024-2028

   119    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Payments

   4,281    5,089 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Less: Interest

   426    122 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amount of Lease Obligations Recorded on Consolidated Balance Sheets

  $3,855   $4,967 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating lease obligations are based on the net present value of the remaining lease payments over the remaining lease term. In determining the present value of lease payments, the Company also guaranteesused the interest rate stated in each lease agreement. As of March 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term is 3.9 years and the weighted average operating discount rate used to determine the operating lease obligations was 5.3%.

Disclosures Related to Periods Prior to the Adoption of ASU NO.2016-02 – Leases (See Note 1).

The payment amounts in the following table, which are as of December 31, 2018, would not differ substantially from the payment amounts as of principal, interest and other amounts payable on the notes issued by Granite State. As of September 30, 2018, the principal amount outstanding for the 7.15% Granite State notes was $3.3 million.March 31, 2018.

Lease Payments ($000’s)  Operating   Capital 

Year Ending December 31,

  Leases   Leases 

2019

  $1,372   $3,069 

2020

   1,138    2,535 

2021

   969    93 

2022

   689    32 

2023

   390    14 

2024-2028

   120    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Payments

  $4,678   $5,743 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 5 – COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK

Common Stock

The Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol, “UTL.”

The Company had 14,119,893,14,815,58514,860,123, 14,876,955 and 14,872,01114,916,044 shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2018, December 31, 20172018 and September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, respectively.

Unitil Corporation Common Stock Offering - On December 14, 2017, the Company issued and sold 690,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $48.30 per share in a registered public offering (Offering). The Company’s net increase to Common Equity and Cash proceeds from the Offering was approximately $31.7 million and was used to make equity capital contributions to the Company’s regulated utility subsidiaries, repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan - During the first nine monthsquarter of 2018,2019, the Company sold 19,7005,939 shares of its common stock, at an average price of $46.97$52.98 per share, in connection with its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (DRP) and its 401(k) plans resulting in net proceeds of approximately $925,000.$314,700. The DRP provides participants in the plan a method for investing cash dividends on the Company’s common stock and cash payments in additional shares of the Company’s common stock.

Stock Plan - The Company maintains the Unitil Corporation Second Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan (the Stock Plan). Participants in the Stock Plan are selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to receive awards under the Stock Plan, including awards of restricted shares (Restricted Shares), or of restricted stock units (Restricted Stock Units). The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine the sizes of awards; determine the terms and conditions of awards in a manner consistent with the Stock Plan; construe and interpret the Stock Plan and any agreement or instrument entered into under the Stock Plan as they apply to participants; establish, amend, or waive rules and regulations for the Stock Plan’s administration as they apply to participants; and, subject to the provisions of the Stock Plan, amend the terms and conditions of any outstanding award to the extent such terms and conditions are within the discretion of the Compensation Committee as provided for in the Stock Plan. On April 19, 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the Stock Plan to, among other things, increase the maximum number of shares of common stock available for awards to plan participants.

The maximum number of shares available for awards to participants under the Stock Plan is 677,500. The maximum number of shares that may be awarded in any one calendar year to any one participant is 20,000. In the event of any change in capitalization of the Company, the Compensation Committee is authorized to make an equitable adjustment to the number and kind of shares of common stock that may be delivered under the Stock Plan and, in addition, may authorize and make an equitable adjustment to the Stock Plan’s annual individual award limit.

Restricted Shares

Outstanding awards of Restricted Shares fully vest over a period of four years at a rate of 25% each year. During the vesting period, dividends on Restricted Shares underlying the award may be credited to a participant’s account. The Company may deduct or withhold, or require a participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy any taxes required by federal, state, or local law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising in connection with an Award. For purposes of compensation expense, Restricted Shares vest immediately upon a participant becoming eligible for retirement, as defined in the Stock Plan. Prior to the end of the vesting period, the restricted shares are subject to forfeiture if the participant ceases to be employed by the Company other than due to the participant’s death.

On January 29, 2018, 37,5102019, 33,150 Restricted Shares were issued in conjunction with the Stock Plan with an aggregate market value at the date of issuance of approximately $1.6 million. There were 49,58160,496 and 89,32690,882non-vested shares under the Stock Plan as of September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of these shares was $41.96$46.23 and $39.54,$41.93, respectively. The compensation expense associated with the issuance of shares under the Stock Plan is being recognized over the vesting period and was $2.1$1.7 million and $2.6$1.8 million for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively. At September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there was approximately $1.0$1.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost under the Stock Plan which is expected to be recognized over approximately 2.53.0 years. During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 there were 784 shares of Restricted Shares forfeited. There wereno forfeitures and no cancellations under the Stock Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.Plan.

Restricted Stock Units

Non-management members of the Company’s Board of Directors (Directors) may elect to receive the equity portion of their annual retainer in the form of Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units earn dividend equivalents and will generally be settled by payment to each Director as soon as practicable following the Director’s separation from service to the Company. The Restricted Stock Units will be paid such that the Director will receive (i) 70% of the shares of the Company’s common stock underlying the restricted stock units and (ii) cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of 30% of the shares of the Company’s common stock underlying

the Restricted Stock Units. The equity portion of Restricted Stock Units activity during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 in conjunction with the Stock Plan are presented in the following table:

 

Restricted Stock Units (Equity Portion)

Restricted Stock Units (Equity Portion)

 

Restricted Stock Units (Equity Portion)

 
  Units   Weighted
Average
Stock
Price
   Units   Weighted
Average
Stock
Price
 

Restricted Stock Units as of December 31, 2017

   52,224   $36.22 

Restricted Stock Units as of December 31, 2018

   61,789   $38.25 

Restricted Stock Units Granted

   —      —      —      —   

Dividend Equivalents Earned

   1,230   $46.87    417   $54.91 

Restricted Stock Units Settled

   —      —      —      —   
  

 

     

 

   

Restricted Stock Units as of September 30, 2018

   53,454   $36.47 

Restricted Stock Units as of March 31, 2019

   62,206   $38.36 
  

 

     

 

   

There were 44,34352,677 Restricted Stock Units outstanding as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2018 with a weighted average stock price of $33.72. On October 1, 2018, there were 11,275 fully-vested Restricted Stock Units issued to members of the Company’s Board of Directors.$36.27. Included in Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 20172018 is $1.2$1.4 million, $0.9$1.0 million and $1.0$1.3 million, respectively, representing the fair value of liabilities associated with the portion of fully vested RSUs that will be settled in cash.

Preferred Stock

There was $0.2 million, or 1,893 shares, of Unitil Energy’s 6.00% Series Preferred Stock outstanding as of September 30,March 31, 2019, March 31, 2018 September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017.2018. There were less than $0.1 million of total dividends declared on Preferred Stock in each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, and September 30, 2017, respectively.

NOTE 6 – REGULATORY MATTERS

UNITIL’S REGULATORY MATTERS ARE DESCRIBED IN NOTE 8 TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN ITEM 8 OF PART II OF UNITIL CORPORATION’S FORM10-K FOR DECEMBER 31, 20172018 AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 1, 2018.JANUARY 31, 2019.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) was signed into law. Among other things, the TCJA substantially reduced the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. Each state public utility commission, with jurisdiction over the areas that are served by Unitil’s electric and gas subsidiary companies, has issued procedural orders directing how the tax law changes arewere to be reflected in rates, including requiring that the companies provide certain filings and calculations.rates. Unitil has complied with these orders and has made the required changes to its rates as directed by the commissions. The FERC has also opened a rulemaking proceeding on this matter which has been addressed in a rate settlement filing by Granite State (described below).State. More recently, on November 15, 2018, the FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and a Policy Statement to address the TCJA’s effects on the Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (ADIT) on transmission rates. Under the proposed rules all public utilities with transmission formula rates, including Fitchburg, would be required to: (1) include mechanisms to deduct any excess ADIT from or add any deficient ADIT to their rate bases; (2) include mechanisms in those rates that would raise or lower their income tax allowances by any amortized excess or deficient ADIT; and (3) incorporate a new permanent worksheet into their rates that will annually track information related to excess or deficient ADIT. The Company believes that these matters are substantially resolved and will not have a material impact on its financial position, operating results, or cash flows.

In Maine, Northern Utilities’ Maine division recently completed a base rate case (described below). The MPUC’s final order in that docket incorporated the lower tax rates in the calculation of rates for the Company.

Similarly, in New Hampshire, Northern Utilities’ New Hampshire division recently completed a base rate case proceeding (described below). The NHPUC’s final order in that docket approved a comprehensive settlement agreement among the Company, the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission and the Office of Consumer Advocate which included the effect of the tax changes in the calculation of the revenue requirement. With respect to Unitil Energy, on April 30, 2018 the NHPUC approved the Company’s annual step increase pursuant to the provisions of its last base rate case, which included adjustments to account for the TCJA’s income tax changes.

In Massachusetts, the MDPU issued an order opening an investigation into the effect on rates of the decrease in the federal corporate income tax rate on the MDPU’s regulated utilities, and required each utility subject to its jurisdiction to submit proposals to address the effects of the TCJA and to reduce its rates as of January 1, 2018. The MDPU consolidated an earlier petition filed by the Attorney General requesting such an investigation into its order. On June 29, 2018, the MDPU issued an order accepting Fitchburg’s proposal to decrease the annual revenue requirement of both its gas and electric divisions by $0.8 million each. The MDPU will address the refund of excess accumulated deferred income taxes in phase two of its investigation. An order is pending.

On May 2, 2018, Granite State filed an uncontested rate settlement with FERC which accounted for the effects of the TCJA in its rates. The settlement was approved by FERC on June 27, 2018, and complies with and satisfies the FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning the justness and reasonableness of rates in light of the corporate income tax reduction under the TCJA.

Base Rate Case Activity

Unitil Energy – Base Rates –On April 20, 2017 the NHPUC approvedissued its final order providing for a permanent increase of $4.1 million, in electric base rates, and a three year rate plan with an additional rate step adjustment, effective May 1, 2017, of $0.9 million, followed by two annual rate step adjustments in May of 2018 and 2019 to recover the revenue requirements associated with annualcertain capital expenditures. On April 30, 2018, the NHPUC approved Unitil Energy’s secondthe first step adjustment filing.increase, effective May 1, 2018. The filing incorporated the revenue requirement of $3.3 million for 2017 plant additions, a reduction of $2.2 million for the effect of the federal tax decrease pursuant to the TCJA, along with the termination of theone-year $1.4 million reconciliation adjustment which had recouped the difference between temporary rates and final rates. The net effect of the three adjustments resulted in a revenue decrease of $0.3 million. On February 28, 2019, Unitil Energy filed its second and final step adjustment seeking a revenue increase of approximately $340,000. On April 22, 2019 this final step adjustment was approved by the NHPUC, effective May 1, 2019.

Fitchburg – Base Rates – Electric –Fitchburg’s base rates are decoupled, and subject to an annual revenue decoupling adjustment mechanism, which includes a cap on the amount that rates may be increased in any year. In Fitchburg’s last base rate order from the MDPU, issued in April 2016, included the approval ofMDPU approved an annual capital cost recovery mechanism to recover the revenue requirement associated with certain capital additions. While a number of the capital cost recovery filings may remain pending fromyear-to-year in any given year, the Company considers these to be routine regulatory proceedings and there are no material issues outstanding. On June 28, 2018, Fitchburg filed its compliance report of capital investments for calendar year 2017. This matter remains pending.

On November 1, 2018, Fitchburg – Electric Grid Modernization –filed its cumulative revenue requirement associated with the Company’s 2015, 2016 and 2017 capital expenditures and associated Capital Cost Adjustment Factors to become effective on January 1, 2019. On May 10,December 27, 2018, the MDPU issued an order approving a three year grid modernization investment plan for Fitchburg for the period 2018 through 2020 with a spending cap of $4.4 million. The order provides for a cost recovery mechanism for incremental capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses. The electric distribution companies in Massachusetts jointly filed compliance filings in August 2018 including 1) revised proposed performance metrics designed to addresspre-authorized grid-facing investments, 2) a proposed evaluation plan for the three-year investment term, and 3) a model tariff for cost recovery including proposed protocol for identifying and tracking incremental O&M expenses. Approval of these filings is pending. The next three year investment plan is due July 1, 2020 for the period 2021 through 2023, and is required to include a five year strategic plan for 2021 – 2025.

Fitchburg – Solar Generation –On November 9, 2016, the MDPU approved Fitchburg’s petition to develop a 1.3 MW solar generation facility located on Company property in Fitchburg Massachusetts. Construction of the solar generating facility was completed and the facility began generating power on November 22, 2017. On April 2, 2018, Fitchburg submitted its first filing pursuant to its SolarCapital Cost Adjustment tariff, by which the Company recovers its annual revenue requirement related to its investment in the solar generation facility. The filing sought a net amount of approximately $0.3 million for recovery effective June 1, 2018. The recovery of this amount in rates wasFactors were approved by the MDPU on May 31, 2018, subject to further investigation and reconciliation. AOn April 3, 2019, the MDPU issued a final order isapproving Fitchburg’s 2017 filing, which provides for the recovery of the sum of the revenue requirement and reconciliation adjustment of $0.4 million. Final approval of the 2018 filing remains pending.

Fitchburg – Base Rates – Gas –Pursuant to the Company’s revenue decoupling adjustment clause tariff, as approved in its last base rate case, the Company is allowed to modify, on a semi-annual basis, its base distribution rates to an established revenue per customer target in order to mitigate economic, weather and energy efficiency impacts to the Company’s revenues. The MDPU has consistently found that the Company’s filings are in accord with its approved tariffs, applicable law and precedent, and that they result in just and reasonable rates.

Fitchburg – Gas System Enhancement Program –Pursuant to statute and MDPU order, Fitchburg has an approved Gas System Enhancement Plan (GSEP) tariff through which it may recover certain gas infrastructure replacement and safety related investment costs, subject to an annual cap. Under the plan, the Company is required to make two annual filings with the MDPU: a forward-looking filing for the subsequent construction year, to be filed on or before October 31; and a filing, submitted on or before May 1, of final project documentation for projects completed during the prior year, demonstrating substantial compliance with its plan in effect for that year and showing that project costs were reasonably and prudently incurred. While a number of the filings under the GSEP tariff may remain pending fromyear-to-year in any given year, the Company considers these to be routine regulatory proceedings and there are no material issues outstanding. Under this tariff, a revenue increase of $0.9 million went into effect on May 1, 2018, subject to the annual cap and reconciliation. On October 31, 2018, the MDPU approved the Company’s request for a waiver of the annual cap in order to recover its reconciliation adjustment of $0.4 million effective November 1, 2018 associated with its actual 2017 revenue requirement. On October 31, 2018, the Company filed to increase the annual cap for two years and is seeking recovery of a revenue increase of $0.8 million, subject to the annual cap and reconciliation, for effect May 1, 2019. This matter remains pending.

Northern Utilities – Base Rates – Maine –On February 28, 2018, the MPUC issued its Final Order (Order) in Northern Utilities pendingUtilities’ most recent base rate case. The Order provided for an annual revenue increase of $2.1 million before a reduction of $2.2 million to incorporate the effect of the lower federal income tax rate under the TCJA. The MPUC Order approved a return on equity of 9.5 percent and a capital structure reflecting 50 percent equity and 50 percent long-term debt. The Order also provides for a reduction in annual depreciation expense, reducing the Company’s annual operating costs by approximately $0.5 million, and addressed a number of other issues, including a change to therm billing, increases in other delivery charges, and cost recovery under the Company’s TAB Program and TIRA mechanism. The new rates and other changes became effective on March 1, 2018.

Northern Utilities – Targeted Infrastructure Replacement Adjustment (TIRA) – Maine –The settlement in Northern Utilities’ Maine division’s 2013 rate case allowed the Company to implement a TIRA rate mechanism to adjust base distribution rates annually to recover the revenue requirements associated with targeted investments in gas distribution system infrastructure replacement and upgrade projects,

including the Company’s Cast Iron Replacement Program (CIRP). The TIRA had an initial term of four years and covered targeted capital expenditures in 2013 through 2016. In its Order in the currentmost recent base rate case (see above), the MPUC approved an extension of the TIRA mechanism, with adjustment, for an additional eight-year period, which will allow for annual rate adjustments through the end of the CIRP program. On May 7, 2018, the MPUC approved the Company’s request to increase its annual base rates by 2.4%, or $1.1 million, to recover the revenue requirements for 2017 eligible facilities.

Northern Utilities – Targeted AreaBuild-out Program – Maine –In December 2015, the MPUC approved a Targeted AreaBuild-out (TAB) program and associated rate surcharge mechanism. This program is designed to allow the economic extension of natural gas mains to new, targeted service areas in Maine. It allows customers in the targeted area the ability to pay a rate surcharge, instead of a large upfront payment or capital contribution to connect to the natural gas delivery system. The initial pilot of the TAB program was approved for the City of Saco, and is being built out over a period of three years, with the potential to add 1,000 new customers and approximately $1 million in annual distribution revenue in the Saco area. A second TAB program was approved for the Town of Sanford, and has the potential to add 2,000 new customers and approximately $2 million in annual distribution revenue in the Sanford area. In its base rate case Order (described above), On April 17, 2019, the MPUC approved the inclusion of Saco TAB investments in rateCompany’s request to increase its annual base along with a cost recovery incentive mechanismrates by 2.1%, or $1.0 million, to recover the revenue requirements for future TAB investments.2018 eligible facilities.

Northern Utilities – Base Rates – New Hampshire –On May 2, 2018, the NHPUC approved a settlement agreement providing for an annual revenue increase of $2.6 million, a reduction of annual revenue of $1.7 million to reflect the effect of the TCJA, and a step increase of $2.3 million to recover post-test year capital investments, all effective May 1, 2018 (with the revenue increase of $2.6 million reconciling to the date of temporary rates of August 1, 2017 and the revenue decrease for TCJA reconciling to January 1, 2018), for a net increase of approximately $3.2 million. Under the terms of the agreement, on February 27, 2019, the Company may filefiled for a second step increase of approximately $1.4 million of annual revenue for effect May 1, 2019 to recover eligible capital investments in 2018, up2018. This matter remains pending. According to a revenue requirement capthe terms of $2.2 million. If the Company chooses the option to implement the second step increase, thesettlement agreement, Northern Utilities’ next distribution base rate case willshall be based on an historic test year of no earlier than twelve months ending December 31, 2020.

Northern Utilities – Franchise Extensions – New Hampshire –On October 3, 2018, the NHPUC granted Northern Utilities authority to expand its previously limited franchise to provide natural gas service in the Towns of Kingston and Atkinson, New Hampshire to serve new industrial, commercial and residential customers. Northern Utilities has also petitioned the NHPUC to extend its franchise into the Town of Epping, New Hampshire, where new commercial and residential developments present the Company with opportunities for growth. The franchise petition for service to the Town of Epping remains pending.

Granite State – Base Rates –On May 2, 2018, Granite State filed an uncontested rate settlement with FERC which provided for no change in rates, and accounted for the effects of a capital step adjustment offset by the effect of the TCJA. The settlement was approved by FERC on June 27, 2018, and complies with the FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning the justness and reasonableness of rates in light of the corporate income tax reductions under the TCJA. The settlement also provides that Granite State may not file a general (Section 4) rate case prior to April 30, 2019.

Other Matters

NHPUC Energy Efficiency Resource Standard ProceedingFitchburgOn August 2, 2016, Independent Statewide Examination of the NHPUC issuedSafety of the Commonwealth’s Gas Distribution System –The MDPU has engaged a third-party evaluator to conduct an order establishing an Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS), an energy efficiency policyindependent statewide examination of the safety of the gas distribution system to complement the investigation of the National Transportation Safety Board which focuses on the gas incident on September 13, 2018 in the Merrimack Valley and its potential causes. The evaluator will examine the following areas: (1) the physical integrity and safety of the gas distribution system; and (2) the operation and maintenance policies and practices of the gas companies and municipal gas companies, with specific targets or goals for energy savings that New Hampshire electric and gas utilities must meet. The EERS includes a recovery mechanism to compensate the utilities for lost-revenue relatedrespect to the EERS programs, and performance incentives and processesCommonwealth’s gas distribution system, including recommendations for stakeholder involvement, evaluation, measurement and verification, and oversightimprovements. The evaluator will issue a report that will include, but not be limited to, potential opportunities for improvement in each of the EERS programs. In accordance with the Order, on September 1, 2017, the New Hampshire electric and gas utilities jointly filed a Statewide Energy Efficiency Plan for the period 2018-2020, which was approved on January 2, 2018. On September 14, 2018, the New Hampshire electric and gas utilities jointly filed its 2019 update to the Statewide Energy Efficiency Plan. This filingthese areas. The investigation is currently under review by the NHPUC.on-going.

Reconciliation Filings – Fitchburg, Unitil Energy – Electric Grid Modernization –In July 2015,and Northern Utilities each have a number of regulatory reconciling accounts which require annual or semi-annual filings with the MDPU, NHPUC opened an investigation into Grid Modernizationand MPUC, respectively, to address a varietyreconcile costs and revenues and seek approval of issues related to Distribution System Planning, Customer Engagement with Distributed Energy Resources,any rate changes. These filings include: annual electric reconciliation filings by Fitchburg and Utility Cost Recovery and Financial Incentives. The NHPUC engaged a consultant to direct a Working Group to investigate these issues and to prepare a final report with recommendations for the Commission. The final report was filed on March 20, 2017. This matter remains pending.

Unitil Energy – Net Metering –Pursuant to legislation that became effective in May 2016, the NHPUC opened a proceeding to consider alternatives to the net metering tariffs currently in place. The NHPUC issued an Order on June 23, 2017. The Order removes the cap on the total amount of generation capacity which may be owned or operated by customer-generators eligible for net metering. The order also adopts an alternative net metering tariff for small customer-generators (those with renewable energy systems of 100 kW or less) which will remain in effect for a periodnumber of years while further data is collecteditems, including default service, stranded cost changes and analyzed,time-of-use and other pilottransmission charges; costs associated with energy efficiency programs are implemented, and a distributed energy resource valuation study is conducted. Systems that are installed or queued during this period will have their net metering rate structure “grandfathered” until December 31, 2040. The Company does not believe that this proceeding will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, operating results or cash flows.

Unitil Energy – Recent Legislation –On September 13, 2018, thein New Hampshire legislature voted to override New Hampshire Governor Sununu’s veto of Senate Bill 365. The enacted legislation requires Unitil Energy to enter into a power purchase agreement with a trash incinerator located in its service territory to purchase the facility’s entire net electrical output for a period that is coterminous with Unitil Energy’s next six default service procurements. The procurement is to be priced at the adjusted energy rate derived from the default service rates approvedand Massachusetts, as directed by the NHPUC in each applicable default service supply solicitation proceeding. The anticipated higher cost differentialand MDPU; recovery of the ongoing costs of storm repairs incurred by Unitil Energy; and the actual wholesale energy costs for electric power purchase agreement is to be recovered through anon-by-passable charge applicable to all customers.

Fitchburg – Electric Reconciliation Filing –The MDPU investigates and reviews Fitchburg’s annual filings which reconcile the costs and revenues in the Company’s various reconciliation accounts. Typically, the Reconciliation Filings are submitted during the fourth quarter for rates effective January 1natural gas incurred by each of the following year,three companies. Fitchburg, Unitil Energy and the MDPU approves them subject to reconciliationNorthern Utilities have been, and pending further investigation. Subsequently, during the course of the year, the MDPU engagesremain in more intensive review offull compliance with all directives and orders regarding these filings, including discovery and, when deemed necessary, the scheduling of evidentiary hearings. While a number of the Reconciling Filings may remain pending fromyear-to-year in any given year, thefilings. The Company considers these to be routine regulatory proceedings and there are no material issues outstanding.

Fitchburg – Service QualityMassachusetts RFPsOn March 1, 2018, Fitchburg submitted its 2017 Service Quality Reports for both its gas and electric divisions Pursuant to a comprehensive energy law enacted in accordance with new Service Quality Guidelines issued by the MDPU in December 2015. Fitchburg reported that it met or exceeded its benchmarks for service quality performance in all metrics for both its gas and electric divisions. The MDPU approved the gas division’s filing on October 22, 2018. The electric division’s filing is pending approval.

Fitchburg – Energy Diversity –MassachusettsGovernor Baker signed into law H.45682016, “An Act to Promote Energy Diversity” on August 8, 2016. Among many sections inDiversity,” under Section 83C, the bill, the primary provision adds new sections 83c and 83d to the 2008 Green Communities Act. Section 83c requires everyMassachusetts electric distribution company (EDC)companies (EDCs), including Fitchburg, are required to jointly and competitively solicit proposals for long term contracts for at least 400 MW’s of offshore wind energy generation by June 30, 2017, as part of a total of 1,600 MW of offshore wind the EDCs are directed to procure by June 30, 2027. The procurement requirement is subject to a determination byUnder Section 83D of the MDPU thatAct, the proposed long-term contractsEDCs are cost-effective. Section 83d further requires the EDCsrequired to jointly seek proposals for cost effective clean energy (hydro, solar and other)land-based wind) long-term contracts via one or more staggered solicitations the first of which shall be issued not later than April 1, 2017, for a total of 9,450,000 megawatt-hours by December 31, 2022. Emergency regulationsUnitil’s pro rata share of each of these contracts is approximately one percent.

implementing these new provisions, 220 C.M.R. § 23.00 et seq. and 220 C.M.R. § 24.00 et seq. were adopted by the MDPU on December 29, 2016, and adopted as final regulations on March 8, 2017. The EDCs issued the RFP for Section 83D Long-Term Contracts for Qualified Clean Energy Projects pursuant to Section 83d onin March 31, 2017, and project proposals were received on July 27, 2017. Finalafter selection of final projects concludedand negotiation, final contracts for 9,554,940 MWh of Qualified Clean Energy and associated Environmental Attributes from hydroelectric generation were filed in July 2018 for approval by the first quarter of 2018, contracts were signed in June 2018 and on July 23, 2018,MDPU. The Section 83D matter remains pending with the EDCs including Fitchburg, filed the 83d long-term contracts with MDPU forawaiting an approval. This matter remains pending.

The EDCs issued the RFP pursuant to Section 83C for Long-Term Contracts for Offshore Wind Energy Projects pursuant to Section 83c onGeneration in June 29, 2017 and project proposals were received on December 20, 2017. Final selection of projects was made in late May 2018, contracts were signed in July 2018 and on July 23, 2018, the EDCs, including Fitchburg, filed the 83ctwo long-term contracts, each for 400MW of offshore wind energy generation with MDPU for approval. This matter remains pending.

Fitchburg – Recent Legislation –On August 9, 2018, Massachusetts Governor Baker signed into law H. 4857, “An Act to Advance Clean Energy.” The legislation contains numerous provisions, including: a requirement that increasesApril 12, 2019, the pace at which the Class 1 Renewable Portfolio Standard requirement increases, from the current pace of an additional 1 percent of sales each year to an additional 2 percent of sales each year during the period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2029; Electric supply contracts entered into after December 1, 2018 are required to provide a minimum percentage of kWh sales with clean peak resources, subject to regulations to be promulgated by the MDPU; Authorizes electric distribution companies to implement demand charges as part of a monthly minimum reliability charge provided the demand charge is based on system peak demand during the peak hours of the day and if affected customers are informed of the manner by which the demand charges are assessed and ways by which customers may manage and reduce demand; requires all gas distribution companies to report to the MDPU, in a uniform manner, lost and unaccounted for gas each year; Requires electric distribution companies to annually file with the MDPU an Electric Distribution System Resiliency Report which must include heat maps that show the electric load on the distribution system including loads during peak times, highlight the most congested or constrained areas of the distribution system and identify areas of the system most vulnerable to outages due to high electricity demand, lack of local generation, and extreme weather events; Establishes an energy storage target of 1,000 megawatt (MW) hours to be achieved by December 31, 2025, and requires each electric distribution company to submit a report to the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) documenting the energy storage installation in their service territory; Requires the DOER to investigate the necessity of requiring electric distribution companies to jointly conduct additional offshore wind generation solicitations and procurement of up to 1,600 MW of capacity in addition to the 1,600 MW required in H.4568 “An Act to Promote Energy Diversity”. Many of these provisions require further development and implementation by the MDPU and DOER. Fitchburg intends to actively participate in all such proceedings and will comply with all regulatory directives and requirements resulting from these legislative changes.

Fitchburg – Clean Energy RFP –Pursuant to Section 83a of the Green Communities Act in Massachusetts and similar clean energy directives established in Connecticut and Rhode Island, state agencies and the electric distribution companies in the three states, including Fitchburg, issued an RFP for clean energy resources (including Class I renewable generation and large hydroelectric generation) in November 2015. The RFP sought proposals for clean energy and transmission projects that can deliver new renewable energy to the three states. Project proposals were received in January 2016. Selection of contracts concluded during the fourth quarter of 2016 and contract negotiations concluded during the second quarter of 2017. On September 20, 2017, Fitchburg, along with the other three EDCs, filed for approval of the purchase power agreements which were negotiated as a result of the joint solicitation. A hearing on the merits was held in February 2018. The MDPU approved the Offshore Wind Energy Generation power purchase agreements, including the EDCs’ proposal to sell the energy procured under the contract into the ISO-NE wholesale market and to credit or charge the difference between the contract costs and the ISO-NE market costs to customers. The MDPU also determined that the EDCs’ request for remuneration equal to 2.75 percent is reasonable and in the public interest. Also, the MDPU approved the EDCs’ proposal to amend their respective tariffs to include the recovery of costs associated with the contracts. The Company believes that the power purchase obligations under these long-term contracts will have a material impact on June 15, 2018.the contractual obligations and regulatory assets of Fitchburg.

FitchburgNorthern Utilities Gas Supply Cost Investigation Other –On August 25, 2017,The MPUC has opened an investigation into regulatory and rate setting approaches for natural gas supply costs. This order is applicable to all LDCs in Maine, and Northern Utilities is the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (DOER) issued its final Solar Massachusetts Renewable Target (SMART) Program regulations. These regulations were promulgated pursuantfirst company whose procurement practices are being examined. Northern Utilities has been and remains in full compliance with all MPUC directives and orders with respect to Chapter 75 of the Acts of 2016, which required the DOER to establish a new solar incentive program. The regulation is designed to support the continued development of an additional 1,600 MW of solar renewable energy generating sources via a declining block compensation mechanism. On September 12, 2017, the Massachusetts electric utilities jointly filed a model SMART tariffgas procurement.

with the MDPU to implement the program and propose a cost recovery mechanism. Hearings on the merits were held in late March and early April 2018. The MDPU issued its Order on September 26, 2018 making the program effective on that date. Utilities are required to file a revised model tariff prior to October 15, 2018 and, once approved, Fitchburg is required to make a company specific compliance filing. On or before November 1 of each year the Company is required to submit to the MDPU its annual SMART Factor cost recovery filing for effect January 1 of the next year. This matter remains pending.

FERC Transmission Formula Rate Proceedings –Pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act, there are several pending proceedings before the FERC concerning the justness and reasonableness of the Return on Equity (ROE) component of theISO-New England, Inc. Participating Transmission Owners’ Regional Network Service and Local Network Service

formula rates. On April 14, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion vacating a decision of the FERC with respect to the ROE, and remanded it for further proceedings. The FERC had found that the Transmission Owners existing ROE was unlawful, and had set a new ROE. The Court found that the FERC had failed to articulate a satisfactory explanation for its orders. At this time, the ROE set in the vacated order will remain in place until further FERC action is taken. Separately, on March 15, 2018, the Transmission Owners filed a petition for review with the Court of certain orders of the FERC setting for hearing other complaints challenging the allowed return on equity component of the formula rates.

Also pending at FERC is a Section 206 proceeding concerning the justness and reasonableness ofISO-New England, Inc. Participating Transmission Owners’ Regional Network Service and Local Network Service formula rates and to develop formula rate protocols for these rates. On August 17, 2018 a joint settlement agreement among a number of the parties was filed with the FERC and remains pending. Fitchburg and Unitil Energy are Participating Transmission Owners, although Unitil Energy does not own transmission plant. To the extent that these proceedings result in any changes to the rates being charged, a retroactive reconciliation may be required. The Company does not believe that these proceedings will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types, which arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes, based upon information furnished by counsel and others, that the ultimate resolution of these claims will not have a material impact on its financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In early 2009, a putative class action complaint was filed against Unitil’s Massachusetts based utility, Fitchburg, in Massachusetts’ Worcester Superior Court, (captioned Bellermann et al v. Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company). The Complaint sought an unspecified amount of damages, including the cost of temporary housing and alternative fuel sources, emotional and physical pain and suffering and property damages allegedly incurred by customers in connection with the loss of electric service during the ice storm in Fitchburg’s service territory in December 2008. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued an order denying class certification status in July 2016, though the plaintiffs’ individual claims remain pending. The Company continues to believe these claims are without merit and will continue to defend itself vigorously.

NOTE 7 – ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

UNITIL’S ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS ARE DESCRIBED IN NOTE 8 TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN ITEM 8 OF PART II OF UNITIL CORPORATION’S FORM10-K FOR DECEMBER 31, 20172018 AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 1, 2018.JANUARY 31, 2019.

The Company’s past and present operations include activities that are generally subject to extensive and complex federal and state environmental laws and regulations. The Company is in material compliance with applicable environmental and safety laws and regulations and, as of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, has not identified any material losses reasonably likely to be incurred in excess of recorded amounts. However, the Company cannot assure that significant costs and liabilities will not be incurred in the future. It is

possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent federal, state or local environmental laws and regulations could result in increased environmental compliance costs. Based on the Company’s current assessment of its environmental responsibilities, existing legal requirements and regulatory policies, the Company does not believe that these environmental costs will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Northern Utilities Manufactured Gas Plant Sites –Northern Utilities has an extensive program to identify, investigate and remediate former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites, which were operated from themid-1800s through themid-1900s. In New Hampshire, MGP sites were identified in Dover, Exeter, Portsmouth, Rochester and Somersworth. In Maine, Northern Utilities has documented the presence of MGP sites in Lewiston and Portland, and a former MGP disposal site in Scarborough.

Northern Utilities has worked with the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services to address environmental concerns with these sites. Northern Utilities or others have substantially completed remediation of all sites, though on site monitoring continues and it is possible that future activities may be required. Supplemental remediation at the Exeter MGP commenced in the second quarter of 2018 and was completed in the third quarter of 2018.

The NHPUC and MPUC have approved regulatory mechanisms for the recovery of MGP environmental costs. For Northern Utilities’ New Hampshire division, the NHPUC has approved the recovery of MGP environmental costs over succeeding seven-year periods. For Northern Utilities’ Maine division, the MPUC has authorized the recovery of environmental remediation costs over succeeding five-year periods.

The Environmental Obligations table below shows the amounts accrued for Northern Utilities related to estimated future cleanup costs associated with Northern Utilities’ environmental remediation obligations for former MGP sites. Corresponding Regulatory Assets were recorded to reflect that the future recovery of these environmental remediation costs is expected based on regulatory precedent and established practices.

Fitchburg’s Manufactured Gas Plant Site –Fitchburg has worked with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to address environmental concerns with the former MGP site at Sawyer Passway, and has substantially completed remediation activities, though on site monitoring will continue and it is possible that future activities may be required.

The Environmental Obligations table below shows the amounts accrued for Fitchburg related to estimated future cleanupand periodic, regulatory review costs for the completed permanent remediation of the Sawyer Passway site with asite. A corresponding Regulatory Asset was recorded to reflect that the recovery of these environmental remediation costs areis probable through the regulatory process. The amounts recorded do not assume any amounts are recoverable from insurance companies or other third parties. Fitchburg recovers the environmental response costs incurred at this former MGP site in gas rates pursuant to the terms of a cost recovery agreement approved by the MDPU. Pursuant to this agreement, Fitchburg is authorized to amortize and recover environmental response costs from gas customers over succeeding seven-year periods.

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the Company’s liability for environmental obligationsEnvironmental Obligations for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and 2017. The Company’s current and noncurrent environmental obligations are recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other Current Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively.

2018.

Environmental Obligations                        
  ($ millions)   ($ millions) 
  Fitchburg   Northern
Utilities
   Total   Fitchburg   Northern
Utilities
   Total 
  Nine months ended September 30,   Three months ended March 31, 
  2018   2017   2018   2017   2018   2017   2019   2018   2019   2018   2019   2018 

Total Balance at Beginning of Period

  $0.1   $0.1   $2.0   $1.8   $2.1   $1.9   $—     $0.1   $2.0   $2.0   $2.0   $2.1 

Additions

   —      —      0.6    0.5    0.6    0.5    —      0.1    0.1    0.1    0.1    0.2 

Less: Payments / Reductions

   0.1    —      0.5    0.2    0.6    0.2    —      0.1    0.1    0.1    0.1    0.2 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Balance at End of Period

   —      0.1    2.1    2.1    2.1    2.2    —      0.1    2.0    2.0    2.0    2.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Less: Current Portion

   —      0.1    0.6    0.4    0.6    0.5    —      0.1    0.6    0.5    0.6    0.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Noncurrent Balance at End of Period

  $—     $—     $1.5   $1.7   $1.5   $1.7   $—     $—     $1.4   $1.5   $1.4   $1.5 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which included a reduction to the corporate federal income tax rate to 21% effective January 1, 2018, was signed into law. In accordance with GAAP Accounting Standard 740, the Company revalued its Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (ADIT) at the new 21% tax rate at which the ADIT will be reversed in future periods. The Company recorded a net Regulatory Liability in the amount of $48.9 million at December 31, 2017 as a result of the ADIT revaluation.

The MDPU issued a multi-utility Order D.P.U.18-15-E (the “Order”) on December 21, 2018. The Order clarified the categories of Excess ADIT for Massachusetts ratemaking: 1) Excess protected ADIT directly related to utility plant fixed assets (rate base), 2) othernon-plant excess ADIT amounts (unprotected), and 3) excess ADIT created through reconciling mechanisms. In the Order, all Massachusetts utilities were ordered to begin flow back of protected and unprotected excess ADIT on February 1, 2019 and to reconcile excess ADIT amounts previously collected from ratepayers through reconciliation mechanisms in the next filing of each of those individual reconciling mechanisms. Fitchburg was ordered to begin flowing back to customers excess ADIT of $10.1 million and $10.4 million to electric and gas ratepayers, respectively, over approximately fifteen years. Fitchburg filed its compliance filing underD.P.U.18-15-E on January 4, 2019 for rates effective February 1, 2019. The MDPU approved this filing on January 16, 2019. The filing will be updated and the balances of excess ADIT will be reconciled annually.

On November 15, 2018 the FERC issued two pronouncements regarding the accounting for income taxes due to the TCJA; 1) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Docket No. RM19-5-000 and 2) Policy Statement PL19-2-000 providing specific guidance on the flow back of excess ADIT created by the implementation of the TCJA. Final rules are expected to be issued in the second quarter of 2019. According to the FERC guidance; the amount of the reduction to ADIT that was previously collected from customers but is no longer payable to the IRS is excess ADIT and should be flowed back to ratepayers under general ratemaking principles.

Based on communications received by the Company from its state regulators in rate cases and other regulatory proceedings in the first quarter of 2018 and as prescribed in the TCJA, the recent FERC guidance noted above and IRS normalization rules; the benefit of these protected excess ADIT amounts will be subject to flow back to customers in future utility rates according to the Average Rate Assumption Method (ARAM). ARAM reconciles excess ADIT at the reversal rate of the underlying book/tax temporary timing differences. The Company estimates the ARAM flow back period to be between fifteen and twenty years. Subject to regulatory approval, the Company expects to flow back to customers a net $47.1 million of protected excess ADIT created as a result of the lowering of the statutory tax rate by the TCJA over periods estimated to be fifteen to twenty years.

In addition to the protected excess $47.1 million ADIT amounts the Company expects to flow through to customers in utility rates, as noted above, there is approximately $1.8 million of excess ADIT created through reconciling mechanisms at December 31, 2017, related to the implementation of the new federal tax rate of the TCJA, which had not been previously collected from customers through utility rates. The Company will reconcile these excess ADIT amounts through the specific reconciliation mechanisms in the next filing of each of those individual reconciling mechanisms which will be subject to the review of state regulators.

In addition to the $48.9 million of net excess ADIT noted above; there is $5.8 million of excess ADIT at December 31, 2017, created by the recognition of Net Operating Loss Carryforward assets (NOLC), discussed below, and related to the implementation of the new federal tax rate of the TCJA, which had not been previously included in utility rates. The Company is recognizing the benefit of this excess ADIT in accordance with the regulatory treatment of excess ADIT for each of jurisdiction. In 2018 the Company recognized $2.4 million of this tax benefit provision due to the turning of book/tax temporary differences associated with this excess ADIT. The Company expects to recognize the remaining $3.4 million of this excess ADIT in future periods, which is currently expected to be in 2019 and 2020, in accordance with regulatory guidance as discussed above.

The Company has not yet received regulatory orders in all of its jurisdictions regarding the flow-back of excess deferred taxes. The Company’s regulators are expected to issue additional ratemaking guidance in future periods that will determine the final disposition of there-measurement of regulatory deferred tax balances. At this time, the Company has applied a reasonable interpretation of the TCJA and a reasonable estimate of the regulatory resolution. Future clarification of TCJA matters with the Company’s regulators may change the amounts estimated.

Under the Company’s Tax Sharing Agreement (the “Agreement”) which was approved upon the formation of Unitil as a PUHC; the Company files consolidated Federal and State tax returns and Unitil Corporation and each of its utility operating subsidiaries recognize the results of their operations in its tax returns as if it were a stand-alone taxpayer. The Agreement provides that the Company will account for income taxes in compliance with U.S. GAAP and regulatory accounting principles. The Company filed its tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2017 with the Internal Revenue Service in September 2018 and generated additional federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwardNOLC assets of $3.7 million principally due to current pension cost deductions, tax repair deductions, tax depreciation and research and development deductions. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company calculated federal current tax of $7.7 million and offset it with a decrease to the federal NOLC of $7.7 million, resulting in no federal current taxes payable for the period. As of September 30,December 31, 2018, the Company had recorded cumulative federal and state NOL carryforwardNOLC assets of $18.2$10.8 million to offset against taxes payable in future periods. If unused, the Company’s NOLNOLC carryforward assets will begin to expire in 2029. In addition, at September 30, 2018,December 31, 2017, the Company had $3.4$3.5 million of cumulative alternative minimum tax credits, general business tax credit and other state tax credit carryforwards to offset future income taxes payable.

In assessing the near-term use of NOLCs and tax credits, the Company evaluates the expected level of future taxable income, available tax planning strategies, reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and taxable income available in carryback years. Based on all available evidence, both positive and negative, and the weight of that evidence to the extent such evidence can be objectively verified, the Company expects to utilize all of its NOLCs by December 31, 2019 prior to their expiration in 2029.

In March 2018, Unitil Corporation received notice that its Federal Income Tax return filings for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016 are under examination by the IRS. Currently, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of this examination will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company remains subject to examination by New Hampshire tax authorities for the tax periods ended December 31, 2015; December 31, 2016; and December 31, 2017. Income tax filings for the year ended December 31, 2017 have been filed with the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration. The State of Maine has concluded its review of the Company’s tax returns for December 31, 2014, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2016 which resulted in a small additional refund to the Company.

In assessing the near-term use of NOLCs and tax credits, the Company evaluates the expected level of future taxable income, available tax planning strategies, reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and taxable income available in carryback years. Based on all available evidence, both positive and negative, and the weight of that evidence to the extent such evidence can be objectively verified, the Company expects to utilize all of its NOLCs by December 31, 2020 prior to their expiration in 2029.

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), which included a reduction to the corporate federal income tax rate to 21% effective January 1, 2018, was signed into law. In accordance with GAAP Accounting Standard 740, the Company revalued its Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (ADIT) at the new 21% tax rate at which the ADIT will be reversed in future periods. The Company recorded a net Regulatory Liability in the amount of $48.9 million at December 31, 2017 as a result of the ADIT revaluation.

On March 15, 2018 FERC issued its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Docket No.RM18-11-000 in which FERC provided specific guidance on the flow back of excess ADIT. The amount of the reduction to ADIT that was collected from customers but is no longer payable to the IRS is excess ADIT and should be flowed back to ratepayers under general ratemaking principles. Subject to regulatory approval, the Company expects to flow back to customers a net $47.1 million of the excess ADIT created as a result of the lowering of the statutory tax rate by the TCJA.

Based on communications received by the Company from its state regulators in rate cases and other regulatory proceedings in the first quarter of 2018 and as prescribed in the TCJA, the recent FERC guidance noted above and IRS normalization rules; the benefit of these excess ADIT amounts will be subject to flow back to customers in future utility rates according to the Average Rate Assumption Method (ARAM). The Company estimates the ARAM flow back period to be between fifteen and twenty years.

The Company’s regulators are expected to issue ratemaking guidance in future periods that will determine the final disposition of there-measurement of regulatory deferred tax balances. At this time, the Company has applied a reasonable interpretation of the TCJA and a reasonable estimate of the regulatory resolution. Future clarification of TCJA matters with the Company’s regulators may change the amounts estimated.

In addition to the excess $47.1 million ADIT amounts the Company expects to flow through to customers in utility rates, as noted above, there was $1.8 million of excess ADIT at December 31, 2017, related to the implementation of the new federal tax rate of the TCJA, which had not been previously collected from customers through utility rates. The Company will recognize a benefit in its tax provision as the underlying book/tax temporary differences reverse in the current and future periods.

The Company evaluated its tax positions at September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 in accordance with the FASB Codification, and has concluded that no adjustment for recognition,de-recognition, settlement and foreseeable future events to any tax liabilities or assets as defined by the FASB Codification is required. The Company remains subject to examination by Federal, Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tax authorities for the tax periods ended December 31, 2015; December 31, 2016; and December 31, 2017.

The Company bills its customers for sales tax in Massachusetts and Maine and consumption tax in New Hampshire.Maine. These taxes are remitted to the appropriate departments of revenue in each state and are excluded from revenues on the Company’s unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

NOTE 9: RETIREMENT BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS

The Companyco-sponsors the Unitil Corporation Retirement Plan (Pension Plan), the Unitil Retiree Health and Welfare Benefits Plan (PBOP Plan), and the Unitil Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) to provide certain pension and postretirement benefits for its retirees and current employees. Please see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172018 as filed with the SEC on February 1,January 31, 2018 for additional information regarding these plans.

The following table includes the key weighted average assumptions used in determining the Company’s benefit plan costs and obligations:

 

   2018  2017 

Used to Determine Plan Costs

   

Discount Rate

   3.60  4.10

Rate of Compensation Increase

   3.00  3.00

Expected Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   7.75  7.75

Health Care Cost Trend Rate Assumed for Next Year

   7.50  8.00

Ultimate Health Care Cost Trend Rate

   4.50  4.00

Year that Ultimate Health Care Cost Trend Rate is reached

   2024   2025 

Used to Determine Plan Costs

  2019  2018 

Discount Rate

   4.25  3.60

Rate of Compensation Increase

   3.00  3.00

Expected Long-term rate of return on plan assets

   7.75  7.75

Health Care Cost Trend Rate Assumed for Next Year

   7.00  7.50

Ultimate Health Care Cost Trend Rate

   4.50  4.50

Year that Ultimate Health Care Cost Trend Rate is reached

   2024   2024 

The following tables providetable provides the components of the Company’s Retirement plan costs ($000’s):

 

   Pension Plan  PBOP Plan  SERP 

Three Months Ended September 30,

  2018  2017  2018  2017  2018  2017 

Service Cost

  $848  $824  $733  $744  $122  $115 

Interest Cost

   1,469   1,514   852   978   101   98 

Expected Return on Plan Assets

   (1,946  (1,826  (409  (337  —     —   

Prior Service Cost Amortization

   81   66   327   350   47   47 

Actuarial Loss Amortization

   1,447   1,165   346   524   121   74 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Sub-total

   1,899   1,743   1,849   2,259   391   334 

Amounts Capitalized and Deferred

   (962  (932  (930  (1,226  (113  (99
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Periodic Benefit Cost Recognized

  $937  $811  $919  $1,033  $278  $235 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  Pension Plan PBOP Plan SERP   Pension Plan PBOP Plan SERP 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

  2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 

Three Months Ended March 31,

  2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 

Service Cost

  $2,544  $2,471  $2,199  $2,231  $366  $345   $776  $848  $576  $733  $60  $122 

Interest Cost

   4,407   4,543   2,554   2,935   303   294    1,621   1,469   856   851   139   101 

Expected Return on Plan Assets

   (5,838  (5,479  (1,227  (1,010  —     —      (2,119  (1,946  (411  (409  —     —   

Prior Service Cost Amortization

   243   197   981   1,049   141   141    80   81   303   327   3   47 

Actuarial Loss Amortization

   4,341   3,496   1,038   1,573   365   222    1,081   1,447   57   346   158   122 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Sub-total

   5,697   5,228  5,545   6,778   1,175   1,002    1,439  1,899  1,381   1,848   360   392 

Amounts Capitalized and Deferred

   (2,590  (2,402  (2,557  (3,418  (339  (297   (412  (720  (474  (742  (103  (113
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net Periodic Benefit Cost Recognized

  $3,107  $2,826  $2,988  $3,360  $836  $705   $1,027  $1,179  $907  $1,106  $257  $279 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Employer Contributions

As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the Company had made $16.6$1.3 million and $3.0$0.4 million of contributions to its Pension Plan and PBOP Plans,Plan, respectively, in 2018.2019. The Company, along with its subsidiaries, expects to continue to make contributions to its Pension and PBOP Plans in 20182019 and future years at minimum required and discretionary funding levels consistent with the amounts recovered in the distribution utilities’ rates for these Pension and PBOP Plan costs.

As of September 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the Company had made $87,500$0.1 million of benefit payments under the SERP Plan in 2018.2019. The Company presently anticipates making an additional $313,100$0.5 million of benefit payments under the SERP Plan in 2018.2019.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Reference is made to the “Interest Rate Risk” and “Market“Commodity Price Risk” sections of Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (above).

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded as of September 30, 2018March 31, 2019 that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and15(d)-15(e)) are effective.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and15(d)-15(f)) during the fiscal quarter covered by this Form10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Certain specific matters are discussed in Notes 6 and 7 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. In the opinion of Management, based upon information furnished by counsel and others, the ultimate resolution of these claims will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Form10-K for the year-ended December 31, 20172018 as filed with the SEC on February 1, 2018.

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no sales of unregistered equity securities by the Company during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Pursuant to the written trading plan under Rule10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), adopted and announced by the Company on May 1, 2018, the Company will periodically repurchase shares of its Common Stock on the open market related to Employee Length of Service Awards and the stock portion of the Directors’ annual retainer for those Directors who elected to receive common stock. There is no pool or maximum number of shares related to these purchases; however, the trading plan will terminate when $92,700 in value of shares have been purchased or, if sooner, on May 1, 2019.

The Company may suspend or terminate this trading plan at any time, so long as the suspension or termination is made in good faith and not as part of a plan or scheme to evade the prohibitions of Rule10b-5 under the Exchange Act, or other applicable securities laws.

The following table shows information regarding repurchases by the Company of shares of its common stock pursuant to the trading plan for each month in the quarter ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.

 

   Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price Paid
per Share
   Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
   Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
 

7/1/18 – 7/31/18

   —      —      —     $85,020 

8/1/18 – 8/31/18

   —      —      —     $85,020 

9/1/18 – 9/30/18

   190   $50.18    190   $75,366 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total

   190   $50.18    190   
  

 

 

     

 

 

   
   Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price Paid
per Share
   Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
   Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
 

1/1/19 – 1/31/19

              $59,311 

2/1/19 – 2/28/19

              $59,311 

3/1/19 – 3/31/19

              $59,311 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total

              
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Item 5.

Other Information

On OctoberApril 25, 2018,2019, the Company issued a press release announcing its results of operations for the three- and nine-month periodsthree-month period ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. The press release is furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q as Exhibit 99.1.

Item 6.

Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description of Exhibit

  

Reference*Reference

  4.1Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July  25, 2018 among Unitil Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the LendersExhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018(SEC File No. 1-8858)
  4.2Amended and Restated Note issued to Bank of America, N.A.Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018(SEC File No. 1-8858)
  4.3Amended and Restated Note issued to Citizens Bank, N.A.Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018 (SEC FileNo. 1-8858)
  4.4Amended and Restated Note issued to TD Bank, N.A.Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018 (SEC FileNo. 1-8858)
  10.1Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July  25, 2018 among Unitil Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the Lenders (included as Exhibit 4.1)Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018 (SEC FileNo. 1-8858)
  10.2Amended and Restated Form of Severance Agreement (Three-Year Term)Filed herewith
  10.3Amended and Restated Form of Severance Agreement(Two-Year Term)Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018 (SEC FileNo. 1-8858)
  10.4Amended and Restated Form of Severance Agreement(Two-Year Term;Non-Pension)Exhibit 10.3 toForm 8-K dated July 25, 2018 (SEC FileNo. 1-8858)

  10.5Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Unitil Corporation and Thomas P. Meissner, Jr.Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018(SEC File No. 1-8858)
  10.6Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement PlanExhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018(SEC File No. 1-8858)
  10.7Unitil Corporation Deferred Compensation PlanExhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K dated July 25, 2018(SEC File No. 1-8858)
  11  Computation in Support of Earnings Per Weighted Average Common Share  Filed herewith
  31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith
  31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith
  31.3  Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Rule13a-14 of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith
  32.1  Certifications of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Filed herewith
  99.1  Unitil Corporation Press Release Dated OctoberApril 25, 20182019 Announcing Earnings For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.  Filed herewith
101.INS  XBRL Instance Document.  Filed herewith
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.  Filed herewith
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.  Filed herewith
101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document  Filed herewith

101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.  Filed herewith
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.  Filed herewith

*

The exhibits referred to in this column by specific designations and dates have heretofore been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under such designations and are hereby incorporated by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    UNITIL CORPORATION
    

(Registrant)

Date: OctoberApril 25, 20182019    /s/ Mark H. CollinChristine L. Vaughan
    Mark H. CollinChristine L. Vaughan
    Chief Financial Officer
Date: OctoberApril 25, 20182019    /s/ Laurence M. Brock
    Laurence M. Brock
    Chief Accounting Officer

 

6053