☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes ☐ No ☒

As of December ~~7, 2017,~~5, 2018, the registrant had the following shares outstanding:

~~IDT CORPORATION~~
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of IDT Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “IDT”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and ~~footnotes~~notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending July 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The balance sheet at July 31, ~~2017~~2018 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and ~~footnotes~~notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, please refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The Company’s fiscal year ends on July 31 of each calendar year. Each reference below to a fiscal year refers to the fiscal year ending in the calendar year indicated (e.g., fiscal ~~2018~~2019 refers to the fiscal year ending July 31, ~~2018)~~2019).

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and has since issued amendments thereto (collectively referred to as “ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services, and the guidance defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle. The five-step process to achieve this principle is as follows: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract(s), (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract(s), and (v) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASC 606 also mandates additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.

The Company applied ASC 606 only to those contracts that were not completed as of August 1, 2018. Results for the reporting periods beginning after August 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period results are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with historic accounting under ASC Topic 605.

The Company adopted ASC 606 as of August 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. As this method requires that the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 be recognized at the date of adoption, at August 1, 2018, the Company recorded an $8.6 million reduction to “Deferred revenue”, with an offsetting reduction to “Accumulated deficit”, for the cumulative effect of the adoption. This adjustment related to the change in accounting for breakage primarily from the Company’s Boss Revolution international calling service, traditional calling cards, and international and domestic mobile top-up. A customer’s nonrefundable prepayment gives the customer a right to receive a good or service in the future (and obliges the Company to stand ready to transfer that good or service). However, customers may not exercise all of their contractual rights to receive that good or service. Those unexercised rights are referred to as breakage. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, the Company recorded breakage revenue when the likelihood of the customer exercising its remaining rights became remote. The Company generally deemed the likelihood remote after 12 or 24 months of no activity (depending on the revenue stream). Per ASC 606, if an entity expects to be entitled to a breakage amount, the entity should recognize the expected breakage amount as revenue in proportion to the pattern of rights exercised by the customer, but only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the breakage is subsequently resolved. The Company determined that $8.6 million included in its opening balance of “Deferred revenue” would have been recognized as breakage revenue under ASC 606 in prior periods, and accordingly, recorded the cumulative effect adjustment as of August 1, 2018.

The Company’s inputs for recording breakage revenue was its aging of the deferred revenue balance for its Boss Revolution international calling service, traditional calling cards, international and domestic mobile top-up, and other revenue streams with deferred revenue balances. Upon the adoption of ASC 606, the Company’s method changed to an estimate of expected breakage revenue by revenue stream recorded each month, based on inputs and assumptions about usage of the deferred revenue balances. The Company used its historical deferred revenue usage data by revenue stream to calculate the percentage of deferred revenue by month that will become breakage. The historical data indicated that customers utilize a very high percentage of minutes purchased in the first three months. The Company intends to review its estimates periodically based on updated data and adjust the monthly estimates accordingly.

The Company earns revenue from contracts with customers, primarily through the provision of retail telecommunications and payment offerings as well as wholesale international long-distance traffic termination. The Company has two reportable business segments, Telecom & Payment Services and net2phone (formerly net2phone-Unified Communications as a Service (“UCaaS”)). The Telecom & Payment Services segment markets and distributes the following communications and payment services: (1) retail communications, which includes international long-distance calling products primarily to foreign-born communities, with its core markets in the United States; (2) wholesale carrier services, which is a global telecom carrier, terminating international long distance calls around the world for Tier 1 fixed line and mobile network operators, as well as other service providers; and (3) payment services, which includes payment offerings, such as international and domestic mobile top-up, domestic bill payment and international money transfer, and National Retail Solutions, our merchant services offerings through point-of-sale terminals. The net2phone segment is comprised of (1) cloud-based PBX services offered to enterprise customers mainly through value-added resellers, service providers, telecom agents and managed service providers, (2) SIP trunking, which supports inbound and outbound domestic and international calling from an IP PBX, and (3) cable telephony.

The Company’s most significant revenue streams are from its Boss Revolution international calling service, international and domestic mobile top-up, and wholesale termination provided by its Carrier Services business. The Boss Revolution international calling service and international and domestic mobile top-up are sold direct-to-consumers and through distributors and retailers.

Boss Revolution international calling service direct-to-consumers is offered to on a pay-as-you-go basis or in unlimited plans. The customer prepays for service in both cases, which results in a contract liability (deferred revenue). The contract term for pay-as-you-go plans is minute-to-minute that includes separate performance obligations for the series of material rights to renew the contract. The performance obligation is satisfied immediately after it arises, and the amount of consideration is known when the obligation is satisfied. Since the Company’s satisfaction of its performance obligation and the customer’s use of the service occur simultaneously, the Company recognizes revenue at the point in time when minutes are utilized, since the customer obtained control and the Company has a present right to payment. For unlimited plans, the Company has a stand ready obligation to provide service over time for an agreed upon term. Unlimited plans include fixed consideration over the term. Plan fees for unlimited plans are generally refundable up to three days after payment if there was no usage. Since the Company’s satisfaction of its performance obligation and the customer’s use of the service occur over the term, the Company recognizes revenue over a period of time as the service is rendered. The Company uses an output method as time elapses because it reflects the pattern by which the Company satisfies its performance obligation through the transfer of service to the customer. The fixed upfront consideration is recognized evenly over the service period, which is generally 24 hours, 7 days, or one month.

Boss Revolution international calling service sold through distributors and retailers

Boss Revolution international calling service sold through distributors and retailers is the same service as Boss Revolution international calling service direct-to-consumers. The difference is the distributor and retailers sales channel, which includes the Company’s network of distributors that market to retail locations, in contrast to direct-to-consumers sales through the Company’s mobile app, website or interactive voice response telephone call. The Company sells capacity to international calling minutes to retailers, or to distributors who resell to retailers. The retailer or distributor is the Company’s customer in these transactions. The Company’s sales price to retailers and distributors is less than the end user rate for Boss Revolution international calling service minutes. The customer or the Company may terminate their agreement at any time upon thirty days written notice without penalty. Retailers may sell the Boss Revolution international calling service on a pay-as-you-go basis or in unlimited plans. As described above, for pay-as-you-go, the Company recognizes revenue at the point in time when minutes are utilized, and for unlimited plans, the Company recognizes revenue over a period of time as the service is rendered. Retailers and distributors also receive renewal commissions when end users subsequently purchase minutes directly from the Company. Renewal commissions are payments to a customer that are accounted for as a reduction of the transaction price over time as the end user uses the service.

International and domestic mobile top-up is sold direct-to-consumers and through distributors and retailers in the same manner as the Boss Revolution international calling service. The Company does not terminate the minutes in its mobile top-up transactions. The Company’s performance obligation is to recharge (top-up) the airtime balance of a mobile account on behalf of the Company’s customer. The Company has contracts with various mobile operators or aggregators to provide the mobile top-up service. The Company determined that it is the principal in primarily all its mobile top-up transactions as the Company controls the service to top-up a mobile account on behalf of the Company’s customer. However, for a portion of its domestic mobile top-up business where the Company has no customer service responsibilities, no inventory risk, and does not establish the price, the Company determined that, as the Company is not considered to control the arrangement, it acts as an agent of the mobile operators. The Company records gross revenues based on the amount billed to the customer when it is the principal in the arrangement and records revenue net of the associated costs incurred when it acts as an agent in the arrangement. The performance obligation is satisfied, and revenue is recognized when the recharge of the mobile account occurs. Accordingly, transfer of control happens at the point in time that the airtime is recharged, which is when the Company has a right to payment and the customer has accepted the service.

Carrier Services are offered to both postpaid and prepaid customers. Postpaid customers are billed in arrears and typically consist of credit-worthy companies such as Tier 1 carriers and mobile network operators. Prepaid customers are typically smaller communications companies and independent call aggregators. There is no performance obligation until the transport and termination of international long-distance calls commences. The initial contract durations range from six months to one year with successive extensions. During the initial term, the contract can only be terminated in certain instances (such as bankruptcy of either party, damage to the other party’s network, fraud, or breach of contract). However, no penalties exist if the agreement is terminated in the initial term. After the initial term has expired, either party may terminate the agreement with notice of 30 days to 60 days depending on the agreement. The term of the contract is essentially minute-to-minute as there is no penalty for an early termination and no obligation to send traffic.

Each iteration is a separate optional purchase that is occurring over the contract duration (that is, minute-by-minute). The satisfaction of the performance obligation is occurring at a point in time (as the minutes are transferred) because the provision of the service and the satisfaction of the performance obligation are essentially occurring simultaneously. Revenue is recognized at the point in time upon delivery of the service.

The Company has not generally entered into contracts that have retroactive pricing features. Additionally, as the performance obligations are considered minute-by-minute obligations in the original contract, any modification of the original contract that leads to a conclusion that there is a new contract would not result in any adjustment related to the original contract’s consideration.

The Company provides discounts to its larger customers based on the expectation of a significant volume of minutes that are consistent with that class of customer in the wholesale carrier market. The discounts do not provide a material right to the customer because the customer receives the same pricing for all usage under the contract.

Carrier Service’s contracts may include tiered pricing based on minute volumes. The Company determined that its retroactive tiered pricing should be accounted for as variable consideration because the final transaction price is unknown until the customer completes or fails to complete the specified threshold. Currently, contracts with retroactive tiered pricing are not material. The Company estimates the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a subsequent change in the estimate would not result in a significant revenue reversal.

The Company enters into Notification of Reciprocal Transmission (“NORT”) transactions, in which the Company commits to purchase a specific number of wholesale carrier minutes to other specific destinations at specified rates, and the counterparty commits to purchase from the Company a specific number of minutes to specific destinations at specified rates. The number of minutes purchased and sold is not necessarily the same. The rates in these reciprocal transactions are generally not at prevailing market rates, although the amounts paid to the counterparty in excess of market rates are reflected as a reduction in revenue received from the customer. The initial terms of NORT contracts generally range from one month to six months. Since the arrangements include the promise of minimum guaranteed amounts of traffic, the performance obligation represents a stand ready obligation to provide the specified number of minutes over the contractual term. Since the Company’s satisfaction of its performance obligation of routing calls to their destination includes a minimum guaranteed amount of traffic, the Company recognizes revenue over a period of time as the service is rendered. The customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Company’s performance as the Company performs. The Company uses an output method as the usage of minutes occur because it reflects the pattern by which the Company satisfies its performance obligation through the transfer of service to the customer.

The Company’s core operations are minute-based, paid-voice communications services, and revenue is primarily recognized at a point in time. The Company’s Telecom & Payment Services’ growth initiatives and net2phone-UCaaS are technology-driven, synergistic businesses that leverage the core assets, and revenue in some cases is recognized over time. The following table shows the Company’s revenues disaggregated by business segment and service offered to customers:

The following table shows the Company’s revenues disaggregated by geographic region, which is determined based on selling location:

The Company’s revenue is generally recognized in the same period that its performance obligations are satisfied. The Company does not have any significant revenue from performance obligations satisfied or partially satisfied in previous reporting periods, or transaction price to be allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) at the end of a reporting period.

The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the time of billing to our customers. Trade accounts receivable in our consolidated balance sheets represent unconditional rights to consideration. An entity records a contract asset when revenue is recognized in advance of the entity’s right to bill and receive consideration. The Company has not identified any contract assets.

Contract liabilities arise when the Company receives consideration or bills its customers prior to providing the goods or services promised in the contract. The primary component of the Company’s contract liability balance is the payments received for its prepaid Boss Revolution international calling service, traditional calling cards, and international and domestic mobile top-up services. Contract liabilities are recognized as revenue when services are provided to the customer. The contract liability balances are presented in our consolidated balance sheet as “Deferred revenue”.

The following table presents information about the Company’s contract liability balance:

ASC 606 changed the accounting for costs to obtain and fulfill contracts with customers such that incremental costs of obtaining and direct costs of fulfilling contracts with customers are deferred and amortized consistent with the transfer of the related good or service. The Company’s incremental costs of obtaining a customer contract are sales commissions paid to employees for retailer sales to end users. Employees receive commissions for both the initial sale and renewal sales to the end user. The Company’s commission paid to employees on renewal sales is the same as the commission on initial sales. The Company determined that its renewal commissions are commensurate with the initial commissions. The Company applies the practical expedient whereby the Company primarily charges these costs to expense when incurred because the amortization period would be one year or less for the asset that would have been recognized from deferring these costs.

On August 1, 2018, the Company adopted the ASU related to the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents reported in the consolidated balance sheet that equals the total of the same amounts reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows:

Note 4—IDT Financial Services Holding Limited Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

On June 22, 2017, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary IDT Telecom, Inc. (“IDT Telecom”) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with JAR Fintech Limited (“JAR Fintech”) and JAR Capital Limited to sell the capital stock of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Gibraltar and a wholly-owned subsidiary of IDT Telecom (“IDTFS Holding”), to JAR Fintech. ~~IDT Financial Services~~IDTFS Holding ~~Limited~~ is the sole shareholder of IDT Financial Services Limited (“IDTFS”), a Gibraltar-based bank and e-money issuer, providing prepaid card solutions across the European Economic Area. The Share Purchase Agreement provides for an aggregate purchase price for the outstanding equity interests of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited of approximately $3.8 million plus an amount equal to the value of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited’s net assets, to be paid at closing, subject to adjustments relating to customer assets of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited. The net asset value of IDT Financial Services Holding Limitedsale was $13.9 million at October 31, 2017. A portion of the purchase price will be placed in escrow and released to IDT Telecom once all of the conditions have been met under the Share Purchase Agreement. The sale is expected to close in the first quarter of calendar 2018, subject to regulatory approval and other ~~customary conditions set forth~~conditions. On October 25, 2018, JAR Fintech notified the Company that it considers the agreement terminated by the effluxion of time. All parties have indicated that they remain interested in consummating a transaction regarding the ~~Share Purchase Agreement.~~sale of IDTFS Holding and are working toward that goal while continuing to pursue the required regulatory approvals. The ~~remaining closing conditions~~parties are ~~outside~~negotiating certain changes to the terms of the ~~Company’s control and there can be no assurance that the sale will be completed.~~sale.

The ~~pending disposition~~proposed sale of ~~IDT Financial Services~~IDTFS Holding ~~Limited~~ did not meet the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation and accordingly, its results of operations and cash flows have not been reclassified. The ~~IDT Financial Services~~IDTFS Holding ~~Limited~~ assets and liabilities held for sale included the following:

~~IDT Financial Services~~IDTFS Holding ~~Limited~~ is included in the Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services segment. ~~IDT Financial Services Holding Limited’s (loss) income~~IDTFS Holding’s loss before income taxes and ~~(loss) income~~loss before income taxes attributable to the Company, which is included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, were as follows:

Note ~~3—Proposed Spin-Off~~5—Acquisition of ~~Rafael Holdings, Inc. and Investment in Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Inc.~~Versature Corp.

On ~~October 31, 2017,~~September 14, 2018, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Versature Corp., a software as a service (“SaaS”) business communications solutions and hosted voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) provider serving the Canadian market, for cash of $5.9 million. The acquisition expands the Company’s SaaS business into Canada. Versature’s operating results from the date of acquisition, which were not significant, are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The impact of the acquisition’s preliminary purchase price allocations on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and the acquisition date fair value of the total consideration transferred were as follows (in thousands):

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information of the Company as if the acquisition occurred on August 1, 2017:

On March 26, 2018, the Company completed a pro rata distribution of the common stock that the Company held in the Company’s subsidiary, Rafael Holdings, Inc. (“~~RHI”~~Rafael”), ~~filed a registration statement on Form 10 (containing a preliminary Information Statement for the Company’s stockholders) with the SEC. The Company intends to spin-off RHI~~ to the Company’s stockholders ~~so that RHI will be a separate publicly traded company. RHI intends to apply to have its Class B common stock listed for trading on the NYSE American under the symbol “RFL”. Approval~~ of the spin-off by the Company’s stockholders is not required. The Company’s Board of Directors believes that the spin-off will allow RHI to better focus on its strategic mission and that its potential can be better realized as an independent entity. The spin-off of RHI will occur by way of a pro rata distribution of RHI’s capital stock to the Company’s stockholders. On the distribution date, the Company currently expects that each of the Company’s stockholdersrecord as of the ~~record date for~~close of business on March 13, 2018 (the “Rafael Spin-Off”). The disposition of Rafael did not meet the ~~distribution will receive one share~~criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation and accordingly, Rafael’s assets, liabilities, results of ~~RHI Class A common stock for every two shares~~operations and cash flows have not been reclassified. At the time of the ~~Company’s Class A common stock and one share of RHI Class B common stock for every two shares of~~Rafael Spin-Off, Rafael owned the Company’s Class B common stock. Completion of the RHI spin-off is subject to final approval by the Company’s Board of Directors, receipt of a favorable opinion as to the spin-off’s tax-free status, as well as effectiveness of the Form 10 registration statement filed with the SEC. The Company’s Board of Directors reserves the right to amend, modify or abandon the RHI spin-off and the related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date.

~~RHI will own certain~~ commercial real estate assets and interests in two clinical ~~and early~~ stage pharmaceutical companies that ~~are currently owned~~were previously held by the Company. The commercial real estate holdings ~~consist~~consisted of the Company’s headquarters building and its associated public garage in Newark, New Jersey, an office/data center building in Piscataway, New Jersey and ~~an office condominium~~a portion of a building in Israel that hosts offices for the Company and certain affiliates. The pharmaceutical holdings ~~include~~included debt interests and warrants in Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ~~(“Rafael Pharma”)~~, which is a clinical stage, oncology-focused pharmaceutical company committed to the development and commercialization of therapies that exploit the metabolic differences between normal cells and cancer cells, and ana majority equity interest in Lipomedix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., ~~an early stage~~a pharmaceutical development company based in Israel. ~~In addition, prior~~

Rafael’s loss before income taxes and loss before income taxes attributable to the ~~spin-off, the~~ Company, ~~intends to contribute cash to RHI so that it holds $50 million to $60 million in cash.~~

RHI’s interests in Rafael Pharma, which are held through a 90%-owned non-operating subsidiary, IDT-Rafael Holdings, LLC (“IDT-Rafael Holdings”), include convertible notes issued by Rafael Pharma, and a warrant held by the Company and certain minority holders to purchase up to a majority equity stake in Rafael Pharma at the Company’s discretion in accordance with the terms of the convertible note and the warrant.

IDT-Rafael Holdings had the contractual right to receive additional shares of Rafael Pharma representing 10% of the outstanding capital stock of Rafael Pharma that will be issued upon the occurrence of any of the following: (i) Food and Drug Administration approval of a Rafael Pharma drug application, (ii) an initial public offering of Rafael Pharma at a valuation of over $500 million, or (iii) a sale of Rafael Pharma above certain valuations. Currently, none of the conditions have been satisfied and the right remains contingent. On September 14, 2017, IDT-Rafael Holdings distributed this right to its members on a pro rata basis such that the Company received the right to 9% of the outstanding capital stock of Rafael Pharma and Howard S. Jonas, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, and Chairman of the Board of Rafael Pharma, received the right to 1% of the outstanding capital stock of Rafael Pharma. In addition, as compensation for assuming the role of Chairman of the Board of Rafael Pharma, and to create additional incentive to contribute to the success of Rafael Pharma, on September 19, 2017, the Company transferred its right to receive 9% of the outstanding capital stock of Rafael Pharma to Mr. Jonas. The right is further transferable at the discretion of Mr. Jonas.

Howard Jonas and his wife Deborah Jonas jointly own $525,000 of Series C Convertible Notes of Rafael Pharma, and The Howard S. and Deborah Jonas Foundation own an additional $525,000 of Series C Convertible Notes of Rafael Pharma.

The Company’s controlled 50%-owned subsidiary, CS Pharma Holdings, LLC (“CS Pharma”), holds Rafael Pharma’s Series D convertible promissory note with a principal amount of $10 million (the “Series D Note”). The Series D Note earns interest at 3.5% per annum, with principal and accrued interest due and payable on September 16, 2018. The Series D Note is convertible at the holder’s option into shares of Rafael Pharma’s Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Note also includes a mandatory conversion into Rafael Pharma common stock upon a qualified initial public offering, and conversion at the holder’s option upon an unqualified financing event. In all cases, the Series D Note conversion price is based on the applicable financing purchase price.

The Company and CS Pharma hold warrants to purchase shares of capital stock of Rafael Pharma representing in the aggregate up to 56% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of Rafael Pharma, on an as-converted and fully diluted basis. The right to exercise warrants as to the first $10 million thereof is held by CS Pharma. The exercise price of the warrant is the lower of 70% of the price sold in an equity financing, or $1.25 per share, subject to certain adjustments. The minimum initial and subsequent exercises of the warrant shall be for such number of shares that will result in at least $5 million of gross proceeds to Rafael Pharma, or such lesser amount as represents 5% of the outstanding capital stock of Rafael Pharma, or such lesser amount as may then remain unexercised. The warrant will expire upon the earlier of December 31, 2020 or a qualified initial public offering or liquidation event.

~~The Company’s investment in Rafael Pharma,~~ which was included in ~~“Investments” in~~ the accompanying consolidated ~~balance sheets, consists~~statements of ~~the following:~~operations, were as follows:

Rafael Pharma is a variable interest entity, however, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of Rafael Pharma that most significantly impact Rafael Pharma’s economic performance. At October 31, 2017, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with Rafael Pharma was its $11.7 million investment, since there were no other arrangements, events or circumstances that could expose the Company to additional loss.

* Each of the Company’s certificates of deposit has a CUSIP, was purchased in the secondary market through a broker, and may be sold in the secondary market.

~~At October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017, the Company owned 23,741 and 23,227 shares, respectively, of Zedge, Inc. Class B common stock that had~~Equity securities with a fair value of ~~$69,000 and $48,000, respectively.~~$0.4 million at July 31, 2018 were reclassified to “Other current assets” to conform to the current year presentation (see Note 8).

Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities were ~~$19.6~~$3.4 million and ~~$6.0~~$19.6 million in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. The gross realized gains that were included in earnings as a result of sales were nil in the three months ended October 31, 2018 and $7,000 in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017 and nil in the three months ended October 31, 2016.~~2017. There were no gross realized losses that were included in earnings as a result of sales in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017. The Company uses the specific identification method in computing the gross realized gains and gross realized losses on the sales of marketable securities.

The contractual maturities of the Company’s available-for-sale debt securities at October 31, ~~2017~~2018 were as follows:

The following available-for-sale debt securities were in an unrealized loss position for which other-than-temporary impairments have not been recognized:

At October 31, 2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, there were no securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer. ~~At October 31, 2017,~~

On August 1, 2018, the ~~following~~Company adopted the ASU that requires the Company to provide more information about recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The ASU included, among other changes, the following: (1) equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method or that result in consolidation) will be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (2) a qualitative assessment each reporting period to identify impairment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, (3) financial assets and financial liabilities will be presented separately by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the notes to the financial statements, and (4) an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities ~~included~~ in combination with the ~~table above were~~entity’s other deferred tax assets. Entities will no longer recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale in other comprehensive income. In addition, a ~~continuous~~practicability exception is available for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values and do not qualify for the net asset value practical expedient (the “measurement alternative”). These investments may be measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Entities will have to reassess at each reporting period whether an investment qualifies for this practicability exception. At August 1, 2018, the cumulative effect of adopting this ASU was a $1.2 million increase in “Equity investments”, a $33,000 decrease in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” and a $1.1 million decrease in “Accumulated deficit”, primarily from the measurement at fair value of the Company’s shares of Visa Inc. Series C Convertible Participating Preferred Stock (“Visa Series C Preferred”) and the derecognition of unrealized ~~loss position for 12 months or longer:~~holding losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale.

At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018 and July 31, 2018, the Company ~~did not intend to sell the securities~~owned 42,282 shares of Zedge, Inc. Class B common stock that ~~were in~~had a ~~continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer,~~fair value of $0.1 million. In addition, at October 31, 2018 and ~~it is not more likely than not that~~July 31, 2018, the Company ~~will be required to sell~~owned 25,803 shares of Rafael Class B common stock that had a fair value of $0.2 million. The aggregate fair value of these shares was included in “Other current assets” in the ~~securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity.~~accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The changes in the carrying value of the Company’s equity investments for which the Company elected the measurement alternative was as follows:

In the three months ended October 31, 2018, the Company increased the carrying value of its 1,830 shares of Visa Series C Preferred by $22,000 based on the fair value of Visa Class A common stock and a discount for lack of current convertibility. Each share of Visa Series C Preferred is convertible into 13.952 shares of Visa Class A common stock at Visa’s option starting in June 2020 and will be convertible at the holder’s option beginning in June 2028.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2018-13 that modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the fair value measurement disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2019, however it may impact the Company’s fair value measurement disclosures in the future.

The following tables present the balance of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

(2) – observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities

At October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company did not have any liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

At October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017, the fair value of the Rafael Pharma Series D Note, which was classified as Level 3, was estimated based on a valuation of Rafael Pharma and other factors that could not be corroborated by the market.

The following table summarizes the change in the balance of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.

At ~~both~~ October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had ~~$8.6~~$4.8 million in investments in hedge funds, which were included in ~~“Investments”~~“Equity investments” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s investments in hedge funds ~~are~~were accounted for using the equity method, ~~or the cost method,~~ therefore ~~investments in hedge funds are~~they were not measured at fair value.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s other financial instruments was determined using available market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting these data to develop estimates of fair value. Consequently, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized or would be paid in a current market exchange.

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, other current assets, customer deposits, and other current liabilities.At October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the carrying amount of these assets and liabilities approximated fair value because of the short period of time to maturity. The fair value estimates for cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents were classified as Level 1 and other current assets, customer deposits, and other current liabilities were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other assets and other liabilities.At October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the carrying amount of these assets and liabilities approximated fair value. The fair values were estimated based on the Company’s assumptions, which were classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s investments at October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017 included investments in the equity of certain privately held entities and other investments that are accounted for at cost. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of these investments because of the lack of a quoted market price for the shares of these entities, and the inability to estimate their fair value without incurring excessive cost. The carrying value of these investments was $10.4 million and $10.8 million at October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017, respectively, which the Company believes was not impaired.

In the three months ended October 31, 2017, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.19 per share on its Class A common stock and Class B common stock, or $4.7 million in total. In the three months ended October 31, 2016, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.19 per share on its Class A common stock and Class B common stock, or $4.4 million in total.

On December 4, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.19 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 to holders of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The dividend will be paid on or about December 29, 2017 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 18, 2017.

The Company has aan existing stock repurchase program authorized by its Board of Directors for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 8.0 million shares of the Company’s Class B common stock. In the three months ended October 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 729,110 shares of Class B common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $3.9 million. There were no repurchases under the program in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017 or 2016.~~2017. At October 31, ~~2017, 8.0~~2018, 6.9 million shares remained available for repurchase under the stock repurchase program.

In ~~each of~~ the three months ended October 31, 2017, ~~and 2016,~~ the Company paid $23,000 to repurchase 1,668 ~~and 1,542~~ shares ~~respectively,~~ of Class B common stock that were tendered by employees of the Company to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the lapsing of restrictions on awards of restricted stock. Such shares were repurchased by the Company based on their fair market value on the trading day immediately prior to the vesting date. There were no repurchases from employees in the three months ended October 31, 2018.

On ~~September 28, 2017,~~November 15, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the Company’s 2015 Stock Option and Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s Class B common stock available for the grant of awards thereunder by an additional ~~0.3~~0.1 million shares. The amendment is subject to ~~ratification~~approval by the Company’s stockholders at its annual meeting of stockholders on December ~~14, 2017.~~13, 2018.

On April 16, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors and its Corporate Governance Committee approved an arrangement with Howard S. Jonas, the Chairman of the Board of the Company, related to the purchase of shares of the Company’s Class B common stock by Mr. Jonas. Under the arrangement, Mr. Jonas has agreed to purchase 2,546,689 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock at a price per share of $5.89, which was the closing price for the Class B common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on April 16, 2018 (the last closing price before approval of the arrangement) for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million. The arrangement is subject to approval of the Company’s stockholders at the annual meeting on December 13, 2018. Mr. Jonas has agreed to vote in favor of the arrangement when it is submitted to the stockholders. On May 31, 2018, Mr. Jonas paid $1.5 million of the purchase price. The purchase price will be reduced by approximately $0.2 million, which is the amount of dividends paid on 2,546,689 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock whose record date was between April 16, 2018 and the issuance of the shares. The remainder of the purchase price, or $13.3 million, will be payable following approval of the Company’s stockholders, and the shares will be issued upon payment in full.

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to all classes of common stockholders of the Company by the weighted average number of shares of all classes of common stock outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner as basic earnings per share, except that the number of shares is increased to include restricted stock still subject to risk of forfeiture and to assume exercise of potentially dilutive stock options using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of such increase is anti-dilutive.

The ~~weighted-average number of shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders consists of the following:~~

~~The~~ following shares were excluded from the diluted ~~earnings~~loss per share ~~computation:~~computations because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

InThe diluted loss per share equals basic loss per share in the three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017 ~~the diluted loss per share computation equals basic loss per share~~ because the Company had a net loss and the impact of the assumed exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock would have been anti-dilutive. In the three months ended October 31, 2016, stock options with an exercise price that was greater than the average market price of the Company’s stock during the period were excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation.

~~The Company’s subsidiary,~~As of October 31, 2018, IDT Telecom entered into a credit agreement ~~dated July 12, 2012,~~ with TD Bank, N.A. for a line of credit facility for up to a maximum principal amount of $25.0 million. IDT Telecom may use the proceeds to finance working capital requirements, acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes. The line of credit facility is secured by primarily all of IDT Telecom’s assets. The principal outstanding bears interest per annum at the ~~option of IDT Telecom, at either (a) the U.S. Prime Rate less 125 basis points, or (b) the~~ LIBOR rate adjusted by the Regulation D maximum reserve requirement plus ~~150~~125 basis points. Interest is payable monthly, and all outstanding principal and any accrued and unpaid interest is due on the maturity date of ~~April 30, 2018. At October 31, 2017 and~~ July ~~31, 2017, there were no amounts outstanding under the facility. The Company intends to borrow under the facility from time to time.~~15, 2019. IDT Telecom pays a quarterly unused commitment fee of ~~0.375%~~0.3% per annum on the average daily balance of the unused portion of the $25.0 million commitment. IDT Telecom is required to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants as well as maintain certain financial targets and ratios during the term of the line of credit, including IDT Telecom may not pay any dividend on its capital ~~stock and IDT Telecom’s aggregate loans and advances to affiliates or subsidiaries may not exceed $110.0 million.~~stock.

The accumulated balances for each classification of other comprehensive loss were as follows:

~~At both October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017, unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities included unrealized gain of $2.1 million on the Rafael Pharma Series D Note.~~

The Company has two reportable business segments, Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services and ~~net2phone-Unified Communications as a Service (“net2phone-UCaaS”) (formerly known as UCaaS).~~net2phone. The Company’s reportable segments are distinguished by types of service, customers and methods used to provide their services. The operating results of these business segments are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as the accounting policies of the Company as a whole. The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments based primarily on income (loss) from operations.

The Company modified the way it reports its business verticals within its Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services and ~~net2phone-UCaaS comprise~~net2phone segments to align more closely with its business strategy and operational structure. The modification to the ~~IDT Telecom division.~~ business verticals did not change the reportable business segments.

The Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services segment provides retail telecommunications and payment offerings as well as wholesale international ~~long distance~~long-distance traffic termination. The ~~net2phone-UCaaS~~net2phone segment is comprised of (1) ~~cable telephony, (2)~~ cloud-based ~~private branch exchange, or~~ PBX services offered to enterprise customers ~~exclusively~~mainly through value-added resellers, service providers, telecom agents and managed service providers, ~~(3) Session Initiation Protocol, or~~(2) SIP trunking, which supports inbound and outbound domestic and international calling from an IP PBX, and ~~(4) PicuP, a highly-automated business phone service that answers, routes~~(3) cable telephony. Depreciation and ~~manages voice calls.~~

~~Beginning in~~amortization are allocated to Telecom & Payment Services and net2phone because the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2018, the Telecom Platform Services segment includes Consumer Phone Services, which was previously reported as a separate~~related assets are not tracked separately by segment. Consumer Phone Services provides consumer local and long distance services in certain U.S. states. Comparative results have been reclassified and restated as if Consumer Phone Services was included in Telecom Platform Services in all periods presented.There are no other significant asymmetrical allocations to segments.

Operating segments not reportable individually are included in All ~~Other. All~~ Other, which includes the ~~Company’s~~ real estate holdings and other ~~smaller businesses.~~ investments that were included in the Rafael Spin-Off.

Corporate costs include ~~certain services, such as~~ compensation, consulting fees, treasury and accounts payable, tax and accounting services, human resources and payroll, corporate purchasing, corporate governance including Board of Directors’ fees, internal and external audit, investor relations, corporate insurance, corporate legal, business development, charitable contributions, travel and other corporate-related general and administrative ~~expenses including, among others, facilities costs, charitable contributions and travel, as well as depreciation expense on corporate assets.~~expenses. Corporate does not generate any revenues, nor does it incur any direct cost of revenues.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as the accounting policies of the Company as a whole. The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments based primarily on income (loss) from operations. IDT Telecom depreciation and amortization are allocated to Telecom Platform Services and net2phone-UCaaS because the related assets are not tracked separately by segment. There are no other significant asymmetrical allocations to segments.

On May 21, 2018, Erik Dennis filed a putative class action against IDT Telecom and the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia alleging violations of Do Not Call Regulations promulgated by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. The Company is evaluating the claim, and at this stage, is unable to estimate its potential liability, if any. On August 13, 2018, IDT Telecom and the Company filed a motion to dismiss or in the alternative to strike class allegations. The plaintiff opposed the motion. The motion to dismiss was denied. IDT Telecom and the Company intend to vigorously defend this matter.

On May 2, 2018, Jean Carlos Sanchez filed a putative class action against IDT Telecom in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging that the Company sent unauthorized marketing messages to cellphones in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. On July 26, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. The Company is evaluating the claim, and at this stage, is unable to estimate its potential liability, if any. The Company intends to vigorously defend this matter.

On April 24, 2018, Sprint Communications Company L.P. filed a patent infringement claim against the Company and certain of its affiliates in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,298,064; 6,330,224; 6,343,084; 6,452,932; 6,463,052; 6,473,429; 6,563,918; 6,633,561; 6,697,340; 6,999,463; 7,286,561; 7,324,534; 7,327,728; 7,505,454; and 7,693,131. Plaintiff was seeking damages and injunctive relief. On June 28, 2018, Sprint dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The Company is evaluating the underlying claim, and at this stage, is unable to estimate its potential liability, if any. The Company intends to vigorously defend any claim of infringement of the listed patents.

On July 31, 2013, the Company completed a pro rata distribution of the common stock of the Company’s subsidiary Straight Path Communications Inc. (“Straight Path”) to the Company’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 25, 2013 (the “Straight Path Spin-Off”). On July 5, 2017, plaintiff JDS1, LLC, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated stockholders of Straight Path, and derivatively on behalf of Straight Path as nominal defendant, filed a putative class action and derivative complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Company, The Patrick Henry Trust (a trust formed by Howard S. Jonas that ~~holds~~held record and beneficial ownership of certain ~~of his~~ shares of Straight ~~Path)~~Path he formerly held), Howard S. Jonas, and each of Straight Path’s directors. The complaint alleges that the Company aided and abetted Straight Path Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Davidi Jonas, and Howard S. Jonas in his capacity as controlling stockholder of Straight Path, in breaching their fiduciary duties to Straight Path in connection with the settlement of claims between Straight Path and the Company related to potential indemnification claims concerning Straight Path’s obligations under the Consent Decree it entered into with the ~~Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”),~~FCC, as well as the ~~proposed~~ sale of Straight Path’s subsidiary Straight Path IP Group, Inc. ~~(“SPIP”)~~ to the Company in connection with that settlement. That action was consolidated with a similar action that was initiated by The Arbitrage Fund. The Plaintiffs are seeking, among other things, (i) a declaration that the action may be maintained as a class action or in the alternative, that demand on the Straight Path Board is excused; (ii) that the term sheet is invalid; (iii) awarding damages for the unfair price stockholders ~~are receiving~~received in the merger between Straight Path and Verizon Communications Inc. for their shares of Straight Path’s Class B common stock; and (iv) ordering Howard S. Jonas, Davidi Jonas, and the Company to disgorge any profits for the benefit of the class Plaintiffs. On August 28, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On September 24, 2017, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. ~~The Company intends to vigorously defend the action.~~ On November 20, 2017, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an order staying the case pending the closing of the transaction between Verizon and Straight Path on the grounds that the claims ~~are~~were not ripe. That transaction closed on February 28, 2018 and the Court was so notified. The motion to dismiss was denied. On July 13, 2018, the Company filed a motion for an interlocutory appeal with the Delaware Chancery Court. The Chancery Court granted the motion and the Delaware Supreme Court accepted the appeal. On September 5, 2018, the Company filed the appeal with the Delaware Supreme Court. On October 5, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed their Answering Brief to the appeal. In the three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred legal fees of $0.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, related to this putative class action, which is included in “Other operating expense” in the accompanying consolidated ~~statement~~statements of operations. At this stage, the Company is unable to estimate its potential liability, if any.

On May 5, 2004, the Company filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, seeking injunctive relief and damages against Tyco Group, S.A.R.L., Tyco Telecommunications (US) Inc. (f/k/a TyCom (US) Inc.), Tyco International, Ltd., Tyco International (US) Inc., and TyCom Ltd. (collectively “Tyco”). The Company alleged that Tyco breached a settlement agreement that it had entered into with the Company to resolve certain disputes and civil actions among the parties. The Company alleged that Tyco did not provide the Company, as required under the settlement agreement, free of charge and for the Company’s exclusive use, a 15-year indefeasible right to use four Wavelengths in Ring Configuration (as defined in the settlement agreement) on a global undersea fiber optic network that Tyco was deploying at that time. After extensive proceedings, including several decisions and appeals, the New York Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision to dismiss the Company’s claim and denied the Company’s motion for re-argument of that decision. On June 23, 2015, the Company filed a new summons and complaint against Tyco in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York alleging that Tyco breached the settlement agreement. In September 2015, Tyco filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which the Company opposed. Oral argument was held on March 9, 2016. On October 17, 2016, the judge granted Tyco’s motion and dismissed the complaint. In August 2017, the Company filed an appeal, which Tyco opposed. On November 22, 2017, oral argument was held on the appeal. On December 21, 2017, the Company’s appeal was denied. On January 22, 2018, the Company filed a motion for leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. On February 6, 2018, Tyco opposed the Company’s motion. The First Department denied the Company’s motion for leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. On May 3, 2018, the Company ~~awaits~~filed a motion for leave directly to the ~~court’s decision.~~Court of Appeals. On June 28, 2018, the motion was denied.

In addition to the foregoing, the Company is subject to other legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance in this regard, the Company believes that none of the other legal proceedings to which the Company is a party will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

The Company’s ~~FCC Form 499-A filings for calendar years 2000 through 2006 related to payments to the Universal Service Fund have been audited by the Internal Audit Division~~2017 Federal Communications Commission (“~~IAD”~~FCC”) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (“USAC”), which concluded that the Company incorrectly reported certain revenues on Forms 499-A. USAC’s revisions to the Company’s filing methodology resulted in additional regulatory payments for the years covered by the audits. While the Company believes in the accuracy of its filing methodology and the Company’s Request for Review remains pending, the Company has implemented some of the revisions set forth in the IAD’s filings beginning with the Company’s calendar year 2010 Form 499-A. The Company has accrued for all regulatory fees that the Company believes may be incurred under IAD’s methodology from 2002 through the present, in the event the Company’s Request for Review is denied and/or its methodology is not upheld on appeal, and the Company has made certain payments on amounts that have been invoiced to it by USAC and/or other agencies. The Company’s 2017 FCC Form 499-A, which reports its calendar year 2016 revenue, related to payments due to the FCC, is currently under audit by the ~~IAD.~~Internal Audit Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company. At October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company’s accrued expenses included ~~$39.9~~$42.3 million and ~~$43.5~~$43.9 million, respectively, for these regulatory fees for the years covered by the audit and subsequent years. Until a final decision is reached in the Company’s disputes, the Company will continue to accrue in accordance with IAD’s methodology. If the Company does not properly calculate, or has not properly calculated, the amount payable by the Company to the Universal Service Fund, the Company may be subject to interest and penalties.

The Company had purchase commitments of ~~$60.9~~$27.2 million at October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, including the aggregate commitment of $25.2 million under the Reciprocal Services Agreement described below.

In August 2017, the Company entered into a Reciprocal Services Agreement with a telecom operator in Central America for a full range of services, including, but not limited to, termination of inbound and outbound international long-distance voice calls. The Company has committed to pay such telecom operator monthly committed amounts during the term of the agreement. In addition, under certain limited circumstances, the parties may renegotiate the amount of the monthly payments. In the event the parties do not agree on re-pricing terms after good faith negotiations, then either party has the right to terminate the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, ~~in September 2017,~~ the Company deposited ~~$11.75~~$9.2 million into an escrow account as security for the benefit of the telecom operator, which is included in “Other current assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheet.~~sheet based on the terms and conditions of the agreement.

~~IDT Payment Services and IDT Telecom have~~The Company has performance bonds issued through third parties for the benefit of various states in order to comply with the states’ financial requirements for money remittance licenses and telecommunications ~~resellers, respectively.~~resellers. At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had aggregate performance bonds of ~~$15.1~~$16.5 million outstanding.

The Company treats unrestricted cash and cash equivalents held by IDT Payment Services, which provides the Company’s international money transfer services in the United States, as substantially restricted and unavailable for other purposes. At October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, “Cash and cash equivalents” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets included an aggregate of ~~$8.6~~$15.0 million and ~~$10.8~~$10.7 million, respectively, held by IDT Payment Services that was unavailable for other purposes.

Two customers of the Company have sought indemnification from the Company related to patent infringement claims brought against those customers by a third party.

FCC Investigation of Straight Path Communications Inc. ~~Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release~~

The Company entered into various agreements with Straight Path prior to the Straight Path Spin-Off including a Separation and Distribution Agreement to effect the separation and provide a framework for the Company’s relationship with Straight Path after the spin-off. On September 20, 2016, the Company received a letter of inquiry from the Enforcement Bureau of the FCC requesting certain information and materials related to an investigation of potential violations by Straight Path Spectrum LLC (formerly a subsidiary of the Company and currently a subsidiary of Straight Path) in connection with licenses to operate on the 28 GHz and 39 GHz bands of the Fixed Microwave Services. The Company has cooperated with the FCC in this matter and has responded to the letter of inquiry. If the FCC were to pursue separate action against the Company, the FCC could seek to fine or impose regulatory penalties or civil liability on the Company related to activities during the period of ownership by the Company.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides for the Company and Straight Path to indemnify each other for certain liabilities. The Company and Straight Path each communicated that it was entitled to indemnification from the other in connection with the inquiry described above and related matters. On October 24, 2017, the Company, Straight Path, SPIP and PR-SP IP Holdings LLC (“PR-SP”), an entity owned by Howard Jonas, entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release that provides for, among other things, the settlement and mutual release of potential liabilities and claims that may exist or arise under the Separation and Distribution Agreement between the Company and Straight Path. Consistent with the previously announced term sheet dated April 9, 2017, in exchange for the mutual release, the Company paid Straight Path an aggregate of $16 million in cash, Straight Path transferred to the Company its majority ownership interest in Straight Path IP Group Holding, Inc. (“New SPIP”), which holds the equity of SPIP, the entity that holds intellectual property primarily related to communications over computer networks, subject to the right to receive 22% of the net proceeds, if any, received by SPIP from licenses, settlements, awards or judgments involving any of the patent rights and certain transfers of the patents or related rights, that will be retained by Straight Path’s stockholders (such equity interest, subject to the retained interest right, the “IP Interest”), and the Company undertook certain funding and other obligations related to SPIP. The Settlement Agreement and Release allocates (i) $10 million of the payment and the retained interest right to the settlement of claims and the mutual release and (ii) $6 million to the transfer of the IP Interest.

Consistent with the contemplated arrangement that was previously disclosed, on October 24, 2017, the Company sold its entire majority interests in New SPIP to PR-SP in exchange for $6 million and the assumption by PR-SP of the funding and other obligations undertaken by the Company.

Note ~~13—Income~~17—The Tax Cuts and ~~New Jersey Corporation Business Tax~~Jobs Act

InOn December 22, 2017, the ~~three~~U.S. government enacted “An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018”, which is commonly referred to as “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act reduces the U.S. federal statutory corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018, requires companies to pay a one-time repatriation tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred (“transition tax”), and makes other changes to the U.S. income tax code. Due to the Company’s July 31 fiscal year-end, the lower corporate income tax rate is phased in, resulting in a blended U.S. federal statutory tax rate of approximately 26.9% for the Company’s fiscal 2018, and 21.0% for the Company’s fiscal years thereafter.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), expressing its views regarding Topic 740,Income Taxes, in the reporting period that includes the enactment date of the Tax Act. SAB 118 recognizes that a registrant’s review of certain income tax effects of the Tax Act may be incomplete at the time financial statements are issued for the reporting period that includes the enactment date, including interim periods therein. Specifically, SAB 118 allows a company to report provisional estimates in the reporting period that includes the enactment date if the company does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or fully analyzed for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. The provisional estimates would be adjusted during a measurement period not to exceed 12 months ~~ended~~from the enactment date of the Tax Act, at which time the accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act is required to be completed.

As of October 31, ~~2016,~~2018, the Company ~~determined that~~had not completed its ~~valuation allowance on~~accounting for the ~~losses of Elmion Netherlands B.V., a Netherlands subsidiary, was no longer required due to an internal reorganization that generated~~ income ~~and a projection of income in future periods. The Company recorded a benefit from income taxes of $16.6 million in the three months ended October 31, 2016 from the full recognition~~tax effects of the ~~Elmion Netherlands B.V. deferred tax assets.~~

~~In September 2017,~~Tax Act; however, the Company ~~IDT Domestic Telecom, Inc. (a subsidiary~~had made a reasonable estimate of the ~~Company)~~effect on its existing AMT credit carry-over and ~~certain other affiliates,~~transition tax that was recorded in fiscal 2018. The transition tax is based on total post-1986 earnings and profits which were certified by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority as having met all of the requirements of the Grow New Jersey Assistance Act Tax Credit Program. The corporation business tax credits to be received are a maximum of $21.1 million. The Company may claim a tax credit each tax year for ten years beginning in 2017. The tax credit can be applied to 100% of the Company’s New Jersey tax liability each year, and the unused amount of the annual credit can be carried forward.previously deferred from U.S. income taxes. In ~~addition,~~fiscal 2018, the Company ~~may apply for a~~estimated that it will utilize $12 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards to offset the transition tax credit transfer certificate to sell unused tax credits to another business. The tax credits must be sold for no less than 75% of the value of the tax credits. The tax credits are subject to reduction, forfeiture and recapture if, among other things, the number of full-time employees declines below the program or statewide minimum.

~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board jointly issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard~~ that it expects it will supersede most of the current revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The goals of the revenue recognition project were to clarify and converge the revenue recognition principles under U.S. GAAP and IFRS and to develop guidance that would streamline and enhance revenue recognition requirements. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the standard. The Company expects to adopt this standard on August 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. The Company has identified its main revenue streams, which include Boss Revolution PIN-less international calling revenue, wholesale carrier services revenue, and domestic and international airtime top-up revenue.incur. The Company is currently ~~reviewing contracts~~working to complete various earnings and ~~other relevant documents related~~profits analyses to finalize its ~~wholesale carrier services revenue to determine how to apply~~estimate. The reduction in the ~~new standard to this revenue stream. The Company expects to continue its review and evaluation for its other revenue streams in fiscal 2018. Currently,~~corporate tax rate did not impact the ~~Company cannot reasonably estimate~~Company’s results of operations or financial position because the ~~impact that~~income tax benefit from the ~~adoption of~~reduced rate was offset by the ~~standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.~~valuation allowance.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued an ASU to provide more information about recognition, measurement, presentation~~

The global intangible low taxed income (“GILTI”) and disclosure of financial instruments. The amendments in the ASU include, among other changes, the following: (1) equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method or that result in consolidation) will be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (2) a qualitative assessment each reporting period to identify impairment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, (3) financial assets and financial liabilities will be presented separately by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the notes to the financial statements, and (4) an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferredbase erosion anti-abuse tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale in other comprehensive income. In addition, a practicability exception will be available for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values and do not qualify for the net asset value practical expedient. These investments may be measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Entities will have to reassess at each reporting period whether an investment qualifies for this practicability exception. The Company will adopt the amendments in this ASU(“BEAT”) became effective on August 1, 2018. The Company is ~~evaluating~~reviewing the proposed guidance that was issued by the Internal Revenue Service in September 2018. As a result of its fully-valued net operating losses in the United States, the Company does not anticipate any material impact on its tax provision as a result of GILTI. The Company currently believes there will be no impact from the BEAT.

The Company anticipates that its assumptions and estimates may change as a result of future guidance and interpretation from the Internal Revenue Service, the SEC, the FASB, and various other taxing jurisdictions. In particular, the Company anticipates that the U.S. state jurisdictions will continue to determine and announce their conformity or decoupling from the Tax Act, either in its entirety or with respect to specific provisions. Legislative and interpretive actions could result in adjustments to the Company’s provisional estimates when the accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act is completed. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact ~~that~~of the ~~ASU will have~~Tax Act on its ~~consolidated~~ financial ~~statements.~~ statements and will record the effect of any reasonable changes in its estimates and adjustments.

In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU No. 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), and has since issued amendments thereto, related to the accounting for leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The Company will adopt the new standard on August 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Entities have the option to continue to apply historical accounting under Topic 840, including its disclosure requirements, in comparative periods presented in the year of adoption. An entity that elects this option will recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption instead of the earliest period presented. The Company is evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For receivables, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to current practice, except the losses will be recognized as allowances instead of reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. In addition, an entity will have to disclose significantly more information about allowances, credit quality indicators and past due securities. The new provisions will be applied as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The Company will adopt the new standard on August 1, 2020. The Company is evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that includes specific guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of the period and end of the period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The ASU will be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company will adopt the amendments in this ASU on August 1, 2018. The adoption will impact the Company’s beginning of the period and end of the period cash and cash equivalents balance in its statement of cash flows, as well as its net cash provided by operating activities.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the current guidance, there are three elements of a business—inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. In addition, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs, for example, by integrating the acquired set with their own inputs and processes. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this ASU (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments provide a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The framework includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs. Although outputs are not required for a set to be a business, outputs generally are a key element of a business; therefore, the FASB has developed more stringent criteria for sets without outputs. Lastly, the ASU narrows the definition of the term output. The Company will adopt the amendments in this ASU on August 1, 2018. The Company is evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued an ASU to provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. Pursuant to this ASU, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following are met: (1) the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified (if the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification); (2) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified; and (3) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The Company will adopt the amendments in this ASU prospectively to an award modified on or after on August 1, 2018. The Company is evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued an ASU intended to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the ASU includes certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of hedge accounting guidance in U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company on August 1, 2019. Early application is permitted. Entities will apply the amendments to cash flow and net investment hedge relationships that exist on the date of adoption using a modified retrospective approach. The presentation and disclosure requirements will be applied prospectively. The Company is evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued an ASU to simplify several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. An entity should apply the requirements of Topic 718 to nonemployee awards except for specific guidance on inputs to an option pricing model and the attribution of cost (that is, the period of time over which share-based payment awards vest and the pattern of cost recognition over that period). The amendments specify that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The amendments also clarify that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company on August 1, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the associated notes thereto of this Quarterly Report, and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC).

As used below, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “the Company,” “IDT,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to IDT Corporation, a Delaware corporation, its predecessor, International Discount Telecommunications, Corp., a New York corporation, and their subsidiaries, collectively.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements that contain the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” and similar words and phrases. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected in any forward-looking statement. In addition to the factors specifically noted in the forward-looking statements, other important factors, risks and uncertainties that could result in those differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A to Part I “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Investors should consult all of the information set forth in this report and the other information set forth from time to time in our reports filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

We are a multinational ~~holding~~ company with operations primarily in the telecommunications and payment industries. We have two reportable business segments, Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services and net2phone (formerly net2phone-Unified Communications as a Service, or ~~net2phone-UCaaS (formerly known as~~ UCaaS). ~~The~~Our Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services segment provides retail telecommunications and payment offerings as well as wholesale international ~~long distance~~long-distance traffic termination. ~~The net2phone-UCaaS~~Our net2phone segment is comprised of (1) ~~cable telephony, (2)~~ cloud-based private branch exchange, or PBX, services offered to enterprise customers ~~exclusively~~mainly through value-added resellers, service providers, telecom agents and managed service providers, ~~(3)~~(2) Session Initiation Protocol, or SIP, trunking, which supports inbound and outbound domestic and international calling from an IP PBX, and ~~(4) PicuP, a highly-automated business phone service that answers, routes and manages voice calls. Telecom Platform Services and net2phone-UCaaS comprise our IDT Telecom division.~~(3) cable telephony. Operating segments not reportable individually are included in All Other. ~~All Other includes our real estate holdings and other smaller businesses.~~

Since our inception, we have derived the majority of our revenues and operating expenses from IDT Telecom’s businesses. IDT Telecom’s revenues represented 99.8% and 99.9% of our total revenues in the three months ended October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

On ~~October 31, 2017,~~March 26, 2018, we completed a pro rata distribution of the common stock of our former subsidiary, Rafael Holdings, Inc., or ~~RHI, filed a registration statement on Form 10 (containing a preliminary Information Statement for our stockholders) with the SEC. We intend to spin-off RHI~~Rafael, to our stockholders ~~so that RHI will be a separate publicly traded company. RHI intends to apply to have its Class B common stock listed for trading on the NYSE American under the symbol “RFL”. Approval~~ of the spin-off by our stockholders is not required. Our Board of Directors believes that the spin-off will allow RHI to better focus on its strategic mission and that its potential can be better realized as an independent entity. The spin-off of RHI will occur by way of a pro rata distribution of RHI’s capital stock to our stockholders. On the distribution date, we currently expect that each of our stockholdersrecord as of the ~~record date for~~close of business on March 13, 2018, which we refer to as the ~~distribution will receive one share~~Rafael Spin-Off. The disposition of ~~RHI Class A common stock for every two shares~~Rafael did not meet the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation and accordingly, Rafael’s assets, liabilities, results of ~~our Class A common stock~~operations and ~~one share of RHI Class B common stock for every two shares of our Class B common stock. Completion~~cash flows have not been reclassified. At the time of the ~~RHI spin-off is subject to final approval by our Board of Directors, receipt of a favorable opinion as to~~Rafael Spin-Off, Rafael owned the spin-off’s tax-free status, as well as effectiveness of the Form 10 registration statement filed with the SEC. Our Board of Directors reserves the right to amend, modify or abandon the RHI spin-off and the related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date.

~~RHI will own certain~~ commercial real estate assets and interests in two clinical ~~and early~~ stage pharmaceutical companies that ~~are currently owned by us.~~we previously held. The commercial real estate holdings ~~consist~~consisted of our headquarters building and its associated public garage in Newark, New Jersey, an office/data center building in Piscataway, New Jersey and ~~an office condominium~~a portion of a building in Israel that hosts offices for us and certain affiliates. The pharmaceutical holdings ~~include~~included debt interests and warrants in Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ~~or Rafael Pharma,~~ which is a clinical stage, oncology-focused pharmaceutical company committed to the development and commercialization of therapies that exploit the metabolic differences between normal cells and cancer cells, and ana majority equity interest in Lipomedix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., ~~an early stage~~a pharmaceutical development company based in Israel. In addition, prior to the ~~spin-off,~~Rafael Spin-Off, we ~~intend~~transferred assets to ~~contribute cash to RHI so~~Rafael such that, ~~it holds $50 million to $60~~at the time of the Rafael Spin-Off, Rafael had $42.3 million in ~~cash.~~cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, plus approximately $6 million in hedge fund and other investments.

We lease office space and parking in Rafael’s building and parking garage located at 520 Broad St, Newark, New Jersey. We also lease office space in Israel from Rafael. The leases expire in April 2025. In the three months ended October 31, 2018, we incurred rent expense of $0.4 million in connection with the Rafael leases.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal ~~2017.~~2018. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Critical accounting policies are those that require application of management’s most subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Our critical accounting policies include those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill, valuation of long-lived ~~and intangible~~ assets, income taxes and regulatory agency fees, and ~~IDT Telecom~~ direct cost of revenues—disputed amounts. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For additional discussion of our critical accounting policies, see our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal ~~2017.~~2018.

Recently Issued Accounting ~~Standard~~Standards Not Yet Adopted

In ~~May 2014,~~February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, ~~and the International~~issued Accounting Standards ~~Board jointly~~Update, or ASU, No. 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), and has since issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede most of the current revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. The goals of the revenue recognition project were to clarify and converge the revenue recognition principles under U.S. GAAP and IFRS and to develop guidance that would streamline and enhance revenue recognition requirements. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the standard. We expect to adopt this standard on August 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. We have identified our main revenue streams, which include Boss Revolution PIN-less international calling revenue, wholesale carrier services revenue, and domestic and international airtime top-up revenue. We are currently reviewing contracts and other relevant documents related to our wholesale carrier services revenue to determine how to apply the new standard to this revenue stream. We expect to continue our review and evaluation for our other revenue streams in fiscal 2018. Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the impact that the adoption of the standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued an ASU to provide more information about recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The~~ amendments in the ASU include, among other changes, the following: (1) equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method or that result in consolidation) will be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (2) a qualitative assessment each reporting period to identify impairment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, (3) financial assets and financial liabilities will be presented separately by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the notes to the financial statements, and (4) an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale in other comprehensive income. In addition, a practicability exception will be available for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values and do not qualify for the net asset value practical expedient. These investments may be measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Entities will have to reassess at each reporting period whether an investment qualifies for this practicability exception. We will adopt the amendments in this ASU on August 1, 2018. We are evaluating the impact that the ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU~~thereto, related to the accounting for leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use ~~or ROU,~~(“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. We will adopt the new standard on August 1, 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Entities have the option to continue to apply historical accounting under Topic 840, including its disclosure requirements, in comparative periods presented in the year of adoption. An entity that elects this option will recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption instead of the earliest period presented. We are evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For receivables, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowance for losses. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to current practice, except the losses will be recognized as allowances instead of reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. In addition, an entity will have to disclose significantly more information about allowances, credit quality indicators and past due securities. The new provisions will be applied as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. We will adopt the new standard on August 1, 2020. We are evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that includes specific guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of the period and end of the period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The ASU will be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We will adopt the amendments in this ASU on August 1, 2018. The adoption will impact our beginning of the period and end of the period cash and cash equivalents balance in our statement of cash flows, as well as our net cash provided by operating activities.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the current guidance, there are three elements of a business—inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. In addition, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs, for example, by integrating the acquired set with their own inputs and processes. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this ASU (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments provide a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The framework includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs. Although outputs are not required for a set to be a business, outputs generally are a key element of a business; therefore, the FASB has developed more stringent criteria for sets without outputs. Lastly, the ASU narrows the definition of the term output. We will adopt the amendments in this ASU on August 1, 2018. We are evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued an ASU to provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. Pursuant to this ASU, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following are met: (1) the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified (if the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification); (2) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified; and (3) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. We will adopt the amendments in this ASU prospectively to an award modified on or after on August 1, 2018. We are evaluating the impact that the new standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued an ASU intended to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the ASU includes certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of hedge accounting guidance in U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this ASU are effective for us on August 1, 2019. Early application is permitted. Entities will apply the amendments to cash flow and net investment hedge relationships that exist on the date of adoption using a modified retrospective approach. The presentation and disclosure requirements will be applied prospectively. We are evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued an ASU to simplify several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. An entity should apply the requirements of Topic 718 to nonemployee awards except for specific guidance on inputs to an option pricing model and the attribution of cost (that is, the period of time over which share-based payment awards vest and the pattern of cost recognition over that period). The amendments specify that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The amendments also clarify that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for us on August 1, 2019. We are evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 Compared to Three Months Ended October 31, ~~2016~~2017

We evaluate the performance of our operating business segments based primarily on income (loss) from operations. Accordingly, the income and expense line items below income (loss) from operations are only included in our discussion of the consolidated results of operations.

We have modified the way we report our business verticals within our Telecom & Payment Services and net2phone segments to align more closely with our business strategy and operational structure.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), and has since issued amendments thereto (collectively referred to as “ASC 606”). The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services, and the guidance defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle. The five-step process to achieve this principle is as follows: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract(s), (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract(s), and (v) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASC 606 also mandates additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.

We applied ASC 606 to those contracts that were not completed as of August 1, 2018. For incomplete contracts that were modified before August 1, 2018, we elected to use the practical expedient available under the modified retrospective method, which allows us to aggregate the effect of all modifications when identifying satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price and allocating transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations for the modified contract at transition. Results for the reporting periods beginning after August 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period results are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with historic accounting under ASC Topic 605.

We adopted ASC 606 as of August 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. As this method requires that the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 be recognized at the date of adoption, at August 1, 2018, we recorded an $8.6 million reduction to “Deferred revenue”, with an offsetting reduction to “Accumulated deficit”, for the cumulative effect of the adoption. This adjustment related to the change in accounting for breakage primarily from our Boss Revolution international calling service, traditional calling cards, and international and domestic mobile top-up. A customer’s nonrefundable prepayment gives the customer a right to receive a good or service in the future (and obliges us to stand ready to transfer a good or service). However, customers may not exercise all of their contractual rights. Those unexercised rights are referred to as breakage. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recorded breakage revenue when the likelihood of the customer exercising its remaining rights became remote. We generally deemed the likelihood remote after 12 or 24 months of no activity. Per ASC 606, if an entity expects to be entitled to a breakage amount, the entity should recognize the expected breakage amount as revenue in proportion to the pattern of rights exercised by the customer, but only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the breakage is subsequently resolved. We determined that $8.6 million included in our opening balance of “Deferred revenue” would have been recognized as breakage revenue under ASC 606 in prior periods, and accordingly, recorded the cumulative effect adjustment as of August 1, 2018.

Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services Segment

Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, the Telecom Platform Services segment includes Consumer Phone Services, which was previously reported as a separate segment. Consumer Phone Services provides consumer local and long distance services in certain U.S. states. Comparative results have been reclassified and restated as if Consumer Phone Services was included in Telecom Platform Services in all periods presented.

Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services, which represented ~~97.8%~~97.1% and ~~97.9%~~97.8% of our total revenues in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, markets and distributes ~~multiple~~the following communications and payment ~~services across three broad business verticals:~~services:

●

~~Retail Communications~~Core includes our three largest communications and payments offerings by revenue: Boss Revolution Calling, an international long-distance calling service marketed primarily to immigrant communities in the U.S., Carrier Services, which provides international long-distance ~~calling products primarily~~termination and outsourced traffic management solutions to ~~foreign-born communities~~telecoms worldwide, ~~with its core markets in the United States;~~and Mobile Top-Up, which enables customers to transfer airtime and bundles of airtime, as well as messaging and data credits to friends and family overseas and domestically. Core also includes several smaller communications and payments offerings; and

●

~~Wholesale Carrier Services~~Growth, which is ~~a global telecom carrier, terminating~~comprised of National Retail Solutions’ retailer point-of-sale, or POS, terminal-based services and Boss Revolution international ~~long distance calls around~~money transfer service. International money transfers are generated by direct-to-consumer transfers initiated on the ~~world for Tier 1 fixed line and mobile network operators,~~BOSS Revolution Money app or through the Boss Revolution website as well as ~~other service providers; and~~transfers initiated through an authorized agent or retailer.

●

~~Payment Services provides payment offerings, including international and domestic airtime top-up and international money transfer.~~

Three months ended
October 31,
Change

2017

2016

$

%

(in millions)
Revenues $ 385.1 $ 361.5 $ 23.6 6.5 %
Direct cost of revenues 334.0 309.7 24.3 7.8
Selling, general and administrative 42.1 41.1 1.0 2.6
Depreciation and amortization 4.0 4.2 (0.2 ) (4.6 )
Severance 0.4 — 0.4 nm
Income from operations $ 4.6 $ 6.5 $ (1.9 ) (30.3 )%

~~nm—not meaningful~~

	Three months ended October 31,				Change
	2018		2017		$			%
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	351.8	$	385.1	$	(33.3	)		(8.6	)%
Direct cost of revenues		301.6		334.0		(32.4	)		(9.7	)
Selling, general and administrative		40.9		42.3		(1.4	)		(3.3	)
Depreciation and amortization		4.0		4.0		—			2.1
Severance		—		0.4		(0.4	)		(100.0	)

Income from operations	$	5.3	$	4.4	$	0.9			19.1	%

Revenues. Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services’ revenues and minutes of use ~~and average revenue per minute~~ for the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 consisted of the following:

Three months ended
October 31,

Change

2017

2016

$/#

%

(in millions, except revenue per minute)
Telecom Platform Services Revenues
Retail Communications $ 146.2 $ 158.5 $ (12.3 ) (7.8 )%
Wholesale Carrier Services 170.5 143.3 27.2 19.0
Payment Services 68.4 59.7 8.7 14.6
Total Telecom Platform Services revenues $ 385.1 $ 361.5 $ 23.6 6.5 %
Minutes of use
Retail Communications 1,473 1,829 (356 ) (19.5 )%
Wholesale Carrier Services 5,216 4,348 868 20.0
Total minutes of use 6,689 6,177 512 8.3 %
Average revenue per minute
Retail Communications $ 0.0992 $ 0.0867 $ 0.0125 14.5 %
Wholesale Carrier Services 0.0327 0.0330 (0.0003 ) (0.9 )

	Three months ended October 31,				Change
	2018		2017		$/#			%
	(in millions)
Core Operations:
Boss Revolution Calling	$	123.5	$	132.2	$	(8.7	)		(6.6	)%
Carrier Services		142.2		168.8		(26.6	)		(15.8	)
Mobile Top-Up		65.3		61.5		3.8			6.3
Other		14.6		18.0		(3.4	)		(19.0	)
Growth		6.2		4.6		1.6			35.5

Total revenues	$	351.8	$	385.1	$	(33.3	)		(8.6	)%

Minutes of use
Boss Revolution Calling		1,108		1,263		(155	)		(12.2	)%
Carrier Services		4,508		5,141		(633	)		(12.3	)

~~Retail Communications’ revenue~~Revenues and minutes of use from our Boss Revolution calling service decreased ~~7.8%~~ in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017,~~2018 in line with expectations. Our Boss Revolution calling service continues to be impacted by persistent, market-wide trends, including the proliferation of unlimited calling plans offered by wireless carriers and ~~Retail Communications’~~mobile virtual network operators, and the increasing penetration of free and paid over-the-top voice and messaging services.

Revenues and minutes of use from Carrier Services decreased ~~19.5%~~ in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017. The decrease in Retail Communications’ revenues and~~2018. Over the long-term, we expect that Carrier Services will continue to be impacted as communications globally transition away from traditional international long-distance voice operators. However, Carrier Services’ minutes of use ~~was primarily due~~and revenues will likely continue to ~~increased competition~~fluctuate significantly from ~~wireless network operators, mobile virtual network operators and alternative communications solutions such~~quarter-to-quarter, as ~~over-the-top voice and messaging services. Revenue~~we seek to maximize economics rather than necessarily sustain minutes of use or revenues.

Revenues from our ~~Boss Revolution~~ international ~~calling~~and domestic mobile top-up service ~~which is Retail Communications’ most significant offering, declined 5.4%~~increased in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017, and Boss Revolution’s minutes of use declined 16.4% in the three months ended October 31, 2017 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017. In addition, the decrease in Retail Communications’ revenue and minutes of use in the three months ended October 31, 2017 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017 was2018 due to continuing declines in Europe, South America and Asia, and continuing declines from traditional disposable calling cards in the U.S. Retail Communications’ revenue comprised 38.0% and 43.8% of Telecom Platform Services’ revenue in the three months ended October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Wholesale Carrier Services’ revenue increased 19.0% in the three months ended October 31, 2017 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017, and Wholesale Carrier Services’ minutes of use increased 20.0% in the three months ended October 31, 2017 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017, due to an increase in traditional carrier minutes of use and revenues. Wholesale Carrier Services’ revenue comprised 44.3% and 39.7% of Telecom Platform Services’ revenue in the three months ended October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Payment Services’ revenue increased 14.6% in the three months ended October 31, 2017 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017 due to increases in revenue from our international and domestic airtime top-up service, our international money transfer service, and our National Retail Solutions point-of-sale terminal business. The increase in revenues from airtime top-up in the three months ended October 31, 2017 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017 reflected growth from new mobile partners and diversification of ~~airtime~~our mobile top-up offerings. ~~We have money transmitter licenses in 47 of the 49 states that require such a license, as well as in Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. Future~~

Revenues from our growth in Payment Services is expected from the new Boss Revolution Money app that features international money transfers, airtime top-up and electronic gift cards, and from expansion of money transfer services in New York and California via retailers. National Retail Solutions is also expected to continue growing. Payment Services’ revenue comprised 17.7% and 16.5% of Telecom Platform Services’ revenueinitiatives increased in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2018. Revenues from the Boss Revolution money transfer service through direct-to-consumer channels increased 162% in the three months ended October 31, 2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2018 due to expansion of our global disbursement network. Direct-to-consumer channels now contribute the vast majority of our money transfer revenue. National Retail Solutions’ revenues increased 69% in the three months ended October 31, 2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2018 as its POS network has achieved sufficient scale to enable new revenue sources that supplement the monthly recurring fees generated by the use of its terminals. These emerging services include out-of-home advertising through the terminals’ consumer facing screen, retail analytics, and ~~2016, respectively.~~credit card processing.

	Three months ended October 31,									Three months ended October 31,
	2017			2016			Change			2018			2017			Change
Telecom Platform Services
Telecom & Payment Services
Direct cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues		86.7	%		85.7	%		1.0	%		85.7	%		86.7	%		(1.0	)%

Direct Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues in Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services ~~increased~~decreased in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017 mainly~~2018 primarily due to ~~the 20.0% increase~~decreases in ~~Wholesale~~ Carrier Services’ ~~minutes~~and Boss Revolution calling service’s direct cost of ~~use~~revenues in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017.~~2018, partially offset by an increase in Mobile Top-Up’s direct cost of revenues in the three months ended October 31, 2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2018. Direct cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues in Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services ~~increased~~decreased 100 basis points in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to the continued migration of Boss Revolution calling customers to the direct-to-consumer channel and, in Carrier Services, by a shift to higher margin traffic resulting from the implementation of an outsourcing agreement in ~~the revenue mix within our Telecom Platform Services segment towards Wholesale Carrier Services, which typically exhibits higher direct cost of revenues as~~ a ~~percentage of revenues than our Retail Communications’ offerings.~~key calling corridor.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense in our Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services segment ~~increased~~decreased in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 primarily due ~~an increase~~to a decrease in employee compensation, partially offset by ~~a decrease~~an increase in marketing expense. As a percentage of Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services’ revenue, Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services’ selling, general and administrative expense ~~decreased~~increased to ~~10.9%~~11.6% from ~~11.4%~~11.0% in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization. ~~The decrease in depreciation~~Depreciation and amortization expense was substantially unchanged in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017 was primarily due to~~2018 as more of our property, plant and equipment ~~becoming~~became fully depreciated, ~~partially~~ offset by increases in depreciation of capitalized costs of consultants and employees developing internal use ~~software to support our new products.~~software.

Severance. In the three months ended October 31, 2017, Telecom ~~Platform~~& Payment Services completed an adjustment to its workforce and incurred severance expense of $0.4 million.

~~net2phone-UCaaS~~net2phone Segment

Three months ended
October 31, Change
2017 2016 $ %
(in millions)
Revenues $ 7.8 $ 7.1 $ 0.7 9.1 %
Direct cost of revenues 2.5 3.3 (0.8 ) (24.0 )
Selling, general and administrative 4.7 3.3 1.4 42.1
Depreciation 1.3 0.7 0.6 76.3

Loss from operations $ (0.7 ) $ (0.2 ) $ (0.5 ) (286.3 )%

~~Revenues.~~ ~~net2phone-UCaaS’ revenue increased 9.1%~~Our net2phone segment, which represented 2.9% and 2.0% of our total revenues in the three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, comprises two verticals:

●

net2phone-UCaaS is a rapidly growing, global unified cloud communications offering for business.

●

net2phone-Platform Services includes other offerings leveraging a common technology platform to provide cable telephony and other voice services.

	Three months ended October 31,						Change
	2018			2017			$			%
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	10.5		$	7.8		$	2.7			34.4	%
Direct cost of revenues		3.0			2.5			0.5			21.3
Selling, general and administrative		7.4			4.7			2.7			57.8
Depreciation		1.6			1.3			0.3			21.1

Loss from operations	$	(1.5	)	$	(0.7	)	$	(0.8	)		(122.6	)%

Revenues. net2phone’s revenues in the three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:

	Three months ended October 31,				Change
	2018		2017		$		%
	(in millions)

net2phone-UCaaS	$	4.8	$	2.4	$	2.4		100.4	%
net2phone-Platform Services		5.7		5.4		0.3		5.0

Total revenues	$	10.5	$	7.8	$	2.7		34.4	%

net2phone-UCaaS’s revenues increased in the three months ended October 31, 2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017 primarily due to continued~~2018 driven by the expansion of its U.S. channel partner network and growth ~~from~~in South American markets. In August 2018, net2phone-UCaaS launched its ~~cable telephony~~ service in Mexico, and ~~cloud-based~~on September 14, 2018, net2phone-UCaaS entered the Canadian market through its acquisition of Versature Corp., a software as a service, or SaaS, business communications ~~offering – both~~solutions and hosted voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, provider. Versature contributed $0.7 million in revenue in the U.S. and in South America. In light of the strong growth in the cloud-based communications offering in Argentina and Brazil, net2phone-UCaaS anticipates additional international expansion in South America and Asia in fiscal 2018.three months ended October 31, 2018 after its acquisition.

During the three months ended October 31, 2018, net2phone initiated beta deployment of a new proprietary platform that integrates voice, text, messaging and web chat services across devices. net2phone expects that the unified communications functionality afforded by the new platform will become a key driver of customer acquisitions and increased average revenue per user following its full platform deployment in calendar 2019.

	Three months ended October 31,									Three months ended October 31,						Change
	2017			2016			Change			2018			2017
net2phone-UCaaS
net2phone
Direct cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues		32.1	%		46.1	%		(14.0	)%		29.0	%		32.1	%		(3.1	)%

Direct Cost of Revenues. Direct cost of revenues ~~in net2phone-UCaaS decreased~~increased in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 primarily because of an increase in the direct cost of revenues in net2phone-UCaaS,partially offset by a decrease in the direct cost of revenues in ~~cable telephony service.~~net2phone-Platform Services. Direct cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues ~~in net2phone-UCaaS~~ decreased ~~1,400~~310 basis points in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017 primarily~~2018 because of ~~the decrease in the direct cost of revenues in cable telephony service, as well as~~ decreases in direct cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues in ~~cloud-based PBX and SIP trunking.~~both net2phone-UCaaSand net2phone-Platform Services.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense ~~in our net2phone-UCaaS segment~~ increased in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 due to ~~an increase~~increases in employee compensation ~~resulting from an increase~~and consulting expense, as well as a decrease in the ~~number~~amount of ~~sales~~costs of consultants and ~~information technology employees. We increased~~ employees developing internal use software that was capitalized. As a percentage of net2phone’s revenues, net2phone’s selling, general and ~~compensation in our net2phone-UCaaS segment in fiscal 2017 as we invested~~administrative expenses were 70.5% and 60.1% in the ~~growth of net2phone-UCaaS’ lines of business.~~three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Depreciation. The increase in depreciation ~~and amortization~~ expense ~~in the net2phone-UCaaS segment~~ in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was due to increases in depreciation of capitalized costs of consultants and employees developing internal use software to support our new products.

All Other

~~Currently, operating~~Operating segments not reportable individually are included in All Other, which included the real estate holdings and other investments that were included in the Rafael Spin-Off.

Three months ended
October 31,

Change

2017

2016

$

%

(in millions)
Revenues $ 0.7 $ 0.5 $ 0.2 39.8 %
Direct cost of revenues — — — —
Selling, general and administrative 0.9 — 0.9 nm
Depreciation 0.4 0.4 — 3.0
(Loss) income from operations $ (0.6 ) $ 0.1 $ (0.7 ) (800.0 )%

~~nm—not meaningful~~

	Three months ended October 31,					Change
	2018		2017			$			%
	(in millions)
Revenues	$	—	$	0.7		$	(0.7	)		(100.0	)%
Direct cost of revenues		—		—			—			—
Selling, general and administrative		—		0.8			(0.8	)		(100.0	)
Depreciation		—		0.4			(0.4	)		(100.0	)

Loss from operations	$	—	$	(0.5	)	$	0.5			100.0	%

Revenues. In April 2016, wea subsidiary of Rafael entered into two leases with tenants for space in ~~our headquarters~~Rafael’s building at 520 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey. One lease is for a portion of the sixth floor for an eleven-year term, of which the first six years are non-cancellable. The other lease is for a portion of the ground floor and basement for a term of ten years and seven months. The tenant under this lease has the right to extend the term for three consecutive periods of five years each. Rental income from the first lease commenced in December 2016, and rental income from the second lease commenced in March 2017. In addition, in April 2017, a subsidiary of Rafael entered into a third lease for space in Rafael’s building at 520 Broad Street. Rental income from the third lease commenced in March 2018. Effective with the Rafael Spin-Off, we no longer own the 520 Broad Street building and we no longer record rental income from the building.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense ~~increased~~ in the three months ended October 31, 2017 ~~compared to the similar period in fiscal 2017~~ primarily ~~due to increases in~~included expenses related to ~~RHI~~Rafael and ~~our~~its commercial real estate.

Corporate

	Three months ended October 31,				Change					Three months ended October 31,				Change
	2017		2016		$		%			2018		2017		$			%
	(in millions)									(in millions)
General and administrative expenses	$	2.4	$	1.1	$	1.3		120.0	%	$	2.3	$	2.3	$	—			(0.7	)%
Other operating expense		0.8		0.2		0.6		291.0			0.2		0.8		(0.6	)		(75.0	)

Loss from operations	$	3.2	$	1.3	$	1.9		149.1	%	$	2.5	$	3.1	$	(0.6	)		(20.3	)%

Corporate costs include compensation, consulting fees, treasury and accounts payable, tax and accounting services, human resources and payroll, corporate purchasing, corporate governance including Board of Directors’ fees, internal and external audit, investor relations, corporate insurance, corporate legal, business development, charitable contributions, travel and other corporate-related general and administrative ~~expenses, including, among others, facilities costs, charitable contributions and travel.~~expenses. Corporate does not generate any revenues, nor does it incur any direct cost of revenues.

General and Administrative. ~~The increase in~~ Corporate general and administrative expense was substantially unchanged in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017 was~~2018 primarily ~~due to increases~~because a decrease in legal fees was mostly offset by an increase in employee ~~compensation and stock-based compensation expense.~~compensation. As a percentage of our total consolidated revenues, Corporate general and administrative expense ~~were~~was 0.6% ~~and 0.3%~~ in both the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016, respectively.~~2017.

Other Operating Expense. On July 31, 2013, we completed a pro rata distribution of the common stock of our former subsidiary Straight Path Communications Inc., or Straight Path, to our stockholders. In the three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017, we incurred legal fees of $0.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, related to the Straight Path stockholders’ putative class action and derivative complaint. In the three months ended October 31, 2016, we incurred legal fees of $0.2 million related to a letter of inquiry from the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, in connection with its investigation of potential license violations by Straight Path Spectrum LLC (a subsidiary of Straight Path and formerly a subsidiary of ours). (Seecomplaint (see Note 1115 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 to Part I of ~~the~~this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).

Consolidated

The following is a discussion of our consolidated stock-based compensation expense, and our consolidated income and expense line items below income from operations.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense included in consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses was ~~$0.8~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation, including stock options and restricted stock, was an aggregate of ~~$4.9~~$1.9 million. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting period that ends in 2020.

Three months ended
October 31,

Change

2017

2016

$

%

(in millions)
Income from operations $ 0.1 $ 5.2 $ (5.1 ) (98.4 )%
Interest income, net 0.3 0.3 — 20.3
Other (expense) income, net (0.8 ) 2.4 (3.2 ) (134.5 )
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes (1.4 ) 14.4 (15.8 ) (109.8 )
Net (loss) income (1.8 ) 22.3 (24.1 ) (108.1 )
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (0.3 ) (0.4 ) 0.1 21.5
Net (loss) income attributable to IDT Corporation $ (2.1 ) $ 21.9 $ (24.0 ) (109.5 )%

	Three months ended October 31,						Change
	2018			2017			$			%
	(in millions)
Income from operations	$	1.3		$	0.1		$	1.2			nm
Interest income, net		0.1			0.3			(0.2	)		(70.2	)%
Other expense, net		(1.3	)		(0.8	)		(0.5	)		(63.3	)
Provision for income taxes		(1.2	)		(1.4	)		0.2			16.0

Net loss		(1.1	)		(1.8	)		0.7			36.1
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(0.3	)		(0.3	)		—			(2.0	)

Net loss attributable to IDT Corporation	$	(1.4	)	$	(2.1	)	$	0.7			30.7	%

nm—not meaningful

Other ~~(Expense) Income,~~Expense, net. Other ~~(expense) income,~~expense, net consists of the following:

Three months ended
October 31,

2017

2016

(in millions)
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains $ (0.7 ) $ 2.1
(Loss) gain on investments (0.1 ) 0.3
Total other (expense) income, net $ (0.8 ) $ 2.4

	Three months ended October 31,
	2018			2017
	(in millions)
Foreign currency transaction losses	$	(1.2	)	$	(0.7	)
Loss on investments		—			(0.1	)
Other		(0.1	)		—

Total other expense, net	$	(1.3	)	$	(0.8	)

(Provision ~~for) Benefit from~~for Income Taxes. In the three months ended October 31, 2016, we determined that our valuation allowance on the losses of Elmion Netherlands B.V., or Elmion, a Netherlands subsidiary, was no longer required due to an internal reorganization that generated income and a projection that the income would continue. We recorded a benefit from income taxes of $16.6 million in the three months ended October 31, 2016 from the full recognition of the Elmion deferred tax assets. The change in income tax expense in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017, excluding the benefit from income taxes in the three months ended October 31, 2016,~~2018 was generally due to the differences in ~~the tax~~ rates in the jurisdictions where the results were recorded.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted “An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Titles II and V of the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2018”, which is commonly referred to as “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” or the Tax Act. The Tax Act reduces the U.S. federal statutory corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018, requires companies to pay a one-time repatriation tax, or transition tax, on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, and makes other changes to the U.S. income tax code. Due to our July 31 fiscal year-end, the lower corporate income tax rate is phased in, resulting in a blended U.S. federal statutory tax rate of approximately 26.9% for our fiscal 2018, and 21.0% for our fiscal years thereafter.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, or SAB 118, expressing its views regarding Topic 740,Income Taxes, in the reporting period that includes the enactment date of the Tax Act. SAB 118 recognizes that a registrant’s review of certain income tax effects of the Tax Act may be incomplete at the time financial statements are issued for the reporting period that includes the enactment date, including interim periods therein. Specifically, SAB 118 allows a company to report provisional estimates in the reporting period that includes the enactment date if the company does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or fully analyzed for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. The provisional estimates would be adjusted during a measurement period not to exceed 12 months from the enactment date of the Tax Act, at which time the accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act is required to be completed.

As of October 31, 2018, we had not completed our accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act; however, we had made a reasonable estimate of the effect on our existing AMT credit carry-over and transition tax that was recorded in fiscal 2018. The transition tax is based on total post-1986 earnings and profits which were previously deferred from U.S. income taxes. In fiscal 2018, we estimated that we will utilize $12 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards to offset the transition tax that we expect we will incur. We are currently working to complete various earnings and profits analyses to finalize our estimate.

We continue to review the anticipated impacts of the global intangible low taxed income (“GILTI”) and base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”), which became effective on August 1, 2018. We are reviewing the proposed guidance that was issued by the Internal Revenue Service in September 2018. As a result of our fully-valued net operating losses in the United States, we do not anticipate any material impact on our tax provision as a result of GILTI. We currently believe there will be no impact from the BEAT.

We anticipate that our assumptions and estimates may change as a result of future guidance and interpretation from the Internal Revenue Service, the SEC, the FASB, and various other taxing jurisdictions. In particular, we anticipate that the U.S. state jurisdictions will continue to determine and announce their conformity or decoupling from the Tax Act, either in its entirety or with respect to specific provisions. Legislative and interpretive actions could result in adjustments to our provisional estimates when the accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act is completed. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the Tax Act on our financial statements and will record the effect of any reasonable changes in our estimates and adjustments.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The change in the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the similar period in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 was ~~primarily~~ due to the reduction in the net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in Rafael as a result of the Rafael Spin-Off, partially offset by a decrease in the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in certain IDT Telecom subsidiaries ~~partially offset by~~due to a decrease in the net ~~loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in RHI and RHI’s subsidiary, IDT-Rafael Holdings, LLC.~~income of these subsidiaries.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

We currently expect our cash from operations in the next twelve months and the balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities that we held ~~as of~~on October 31, ~~2017~~2018 to be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements during the twelve-month period ending October 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of ~~$107.0~~$61.8 million and a working capital deficit (current ~~assets~~liabilities in excess of current ~~liabilities)~~assets) of ~~$4.0~~$38.2 million. At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we also had ~~$8.6~~$4.8 million in investments in hedge funds, which were included in ~~“Investments”~~“Equity investments” in our consolidated balance sheet.

We treat unrestricted cash and cash equivalents held by IDT Payment Services as substantially restricted and unavailable for other purposes. At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, “Cash and cash equivalents” in our consolidated balance sheet included an aggregate of ~~$8.6~~$15.0 million held by IDT Payment Services that was unavailable for other purposes.

~~We have not recorded U.S. income tax expense for foreign earnings, since such earnings~~On August 1, 2018, we adopted the ASU related to the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The ASU requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are ~~permanently reinvested outside~~included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the ~~United States. Upon distribution~~beginning of ~~these foreign earnings to our domestic entities, we may be subject to U.S. income taxes~~the period and ~~withholding~~end of ~~foreign taxes, however, it is not practicable to determine~~ the ~~amount, if any, which would be paid.~~period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This ASU also effected the net cash provided by or used in operating activities.

	Three months ended October 31,						Three months ended October 31,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
	(in millions)						(in millions)
Cash flows (used in) provided by:
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	(30.5	)	$	5.5		$	8.2		$	(45.3	)
Investing activities		(1.4	)		(18.5	)		(6.5	)		(1.4	)
Financing activities		(5.1	)		(3.1	)		(4.8	)		(5.1	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(0.2	)		(1.5	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(37.2	)	$	(17.6	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents								(4.6	)		0.6

Decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and cash equivalents							$	(7.7	)	$	(51.2	)

Operating Activities

Our cash flow from operations varies significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, depending on our operating results and the timing of operating cash receipts and payments, specifically trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable.

Gross trade accounts receivable ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$81.4~~$69.2 million at October 31, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$67.6~~$72.6 million at July 31, ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to ~~a $13.6 million increase in IDT Telecom’s gross trade accounts receivable balance. The increase in IDT Telecom’s gross trade accounts receivable balance was primarily due to amounts billed in~~collections in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 in excess of ~~collections~~amounts billed during the ~~period.~~period, and the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Deferred revenue ~~as a percentage~~arises from sales of ~~total revenues~~prepaid products and varies from period to period depending on the mix and the timing of revenues. Deferred revenue ~~arises from IDT Telecom’s sales of prepaid products. Deferred revenue~~ decreased to ~~$74.8~~$45.1 million at October 31, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$76.5~~$55.0 million at July 31, ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to athe $8.6 million non-cash reduction to deferred revenue, with an offsetting reduction to accumulated deficit, for the cumulative effect of the adoption of ASC 606 as of August 1, 2018. The remaining decrease was primarily due to decreases in the ~~IDT Telecom U.S. Boss Revolution balance.~~

~~On September 20, 2016, we received a letter of inquiry from the Enforcement Bureau of the FCC requesting certain information~~traditional calling cards and ~~materials~~net2phone-Platform Services related to an investigation of potential violations by Straight Path Spectrum LLC in connection with licenses to operate on the 28 GHz and 39 GHz bands of the Fixed Microwave Services. We have cooperated with the FCC in this matter and have responded to the letter of inquiry. The FCC could seek to fine or impose regulatory penalties or civil liability on us related to activities during the period of ownership by us.balances.

The Separation and Distribution Agreement related to the spin-off of Straight Path provides for us and Straight Path to indemnify each other for certain liabilities. We and Straight Path each communicated that it was entitled to indemnification from the other in connection with the inquiry described above and related matters. On October 24, 2017, we, Straight Path, Straight Path IP Group, Inc., or SPIP, and PR-SP IP Holdings LLC, or PR-SP, an entity owned by Howard S. Jonas, entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release that provides for, among other things, the settlement and mutual release of potential liabilities and claims that may exist or arise under the Separation and Distribution Agreement between us and Straight Path. ~~Consistent with the previously announced term sheet dated April 9, 2017, in~~In exchange for the mutual release, in October 2017, we paid Straight Path an aggregate of $16 million in cash, Straight Path transferred to us its majority ownership interest in Straight Path IP Group Holding, Inc., or New SPIP, which holds the equity of SPIP, the entity that holds intellectual property primarily related to communications over computer networks, subject to the right to receive 22% of the net proceeds, if any, received by SPIP from licenses, settlements, awards or judgments involving any of the patent rights and certain transfers of the patents or related rights, that will be retained by Straight Path’s stockholders (such equity interest, subject to the retained interest right, the “IP Interest”), and we undertook certain funding and other obligations related to SPIP. The Settlement Agreement and Release allocates (i) $10 million of the payment and the retained interest right to the settlement of claims and the mutual release and (ii) $6 million to the transfer of the IP Interest. In the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows in the three months ended October 31, 2017, $10 million of the aggregate payment to Straight Path was included in operating activities and $6 million of the aggregate payment was included in investing activities.

In August 2017, we entered into a Reciprocal Services Agreement with a telecom operator in Central America for a full range of services, including, but not limited to, termination of inbound and outbound international long-distance voice calls. We have committed to pay such telecom operator monthly committed amounts during the term of the agreement. In addition, under certain limited circumstances, the parties may renegotiate the amount of the monthly payments. In the event the parties do not agree on re-pricing terms after good faith negotiations, then either party has the right to terminate the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, in September 2017, we deposited $11.75 million into an escrow account as security for the benefit of the telecom operator, which was included in operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows. In fiscal 2018, the escrow account balance was reduced to $9.2 million, which is included in “Other current assets” at October 31, 2018 and July 31, 2018 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet based on the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Investing Activities

Our capital expenditures were ~~$5.3~~$4.5 million and ~~$5.5~~$5.3 million in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. We currently anticipate that total capital expenditures for the twelve-month period ending October 31, ~~2018~~2019 will be ~~between $21~~$19 million to ~~$23~~$22 million. We expect to fund our capital expenditures with our net cash provided by operating activities and cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand.

~~Consistent with~~On September 14, 2018, we acquired 100% of the ~~contemplated arrangement that~~outstanding shares of Versature, a SaaS business communications solutions and hosted VoIP provider serving the Canadian market. The acquisition expands our SaaS business in Canada. The cash paid for the acquisition net of cash acquired was ~~previously disclosed, on~~$5.5 million.

On October 24, 2017, we sold our entire majority interests in New SPIP to PR-SP in exchange for $6 million and the assumption by PR-SP of our funding and other obligations. As described above, $6 million of the aggregate payment to Straight Path that was allocated to the transfer of the IP Interest was included in investing activities in the three months ended October 31, 2017.

In the three months ended October 31, 2016, we used cash of $8.0 million for additional investments. In September 2016, Rafael Pharma issued to our 50%-owned subsidiary, CS Pharma Holdings, LLC, or CS Pharma, its convertible Series D Note with a principal amount of $10 million, representing the $8 million investment funded on such date plus the conversion of $2 million principal amount convertible promissory notes issued in connection with a prior funding.

Purchases of marketable securities were ~~$15.7 million~~nil and ~~$11.0~~$15.7 million in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Proceeds from maturities and sales of marketable securities were ~~$19.6~~$3.4 million and ~~$6.0~~$19.6 million in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

Financing Activities

In the three months ended October 31, 2017, we paid cash dividends of $0.19 per share on our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, or $4.7 million in total. In ~~the three months ended October 31, 2016, we paid cash dividends~~fiscal 2018, our Board of ~~$0.19 per share on~~Directors discontinued our ~~Class A common stock and~~quarterly dividend, electing instead to repurchase shares of our Class B common stock ~~or $4.4 million~~when warranted by market conditions, available resources, and our business outlook and results, as well as invest in ~~total. On December 4, 2017,~~ our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.19 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 to holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The dividend will be paid on or about December 29, 2017 to stockholders of record as of the close ofgrowth business ~~on December 18, 2017.~~initiatives.

We distributed cash of $0.3 million and $0.4 million in ~~both~~ the three months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017, ~~and 2016~~respectively, to the holders of noncontrolling interests in certain of our subsidiaries.

~~We received proceeds~~At the time of the acquisition in September 2018, Versature had financing-related other liabilities of $0.7 million. During the period from the ~~exercise~~acquisition to October 31, 2018, we repaid $0.6 million of these liabilities.

We have an existing stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 8.0 million shares of our Class B common stock. In the three months ended October 31, 2018, we repurchased 729,110 shares of Class B common stock ~~options~~for an aggregate purchase price of ~~$0.4 million~~$3.9 million. There were no repurchases under the program in the three months ended October 31, ~~2016,~~2017. At October 31, 2018, 6.9 million shares remained available for ~~which we issued 43,016 shares of our Class B common stock.~~repurchase under the stock repurchase program.

In connection with our investment in Rafael Pharma, our subsidiary CS Pharma issued member interests to third parties in exchange for cash investment in CS Pharma of $10 million. We hold a 50% interest in CS Pharma and we are the managing member. At July 31, 2016, CS Pharma had received $8.8 million, which was included in “Other current liabilities” pending the issuance of the member interests. In the three months ended October 31, ~~2016, CS Pharma received an additional $1.2 million from the sale of its member interests.~~

~~In each of the three months ended October 31,~~ 2017, ~~and 2016,~~ we paid $23,000 to repurchase 1,668 ~~and 1,542~~ shares ~~respectively,~~ of our Class B common stock that were tendered by employees of ours to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the lapsing of restrictions on awards of restricted stock. Such shares were repurchased by us based on their fair market value on the trading day immediately prior to the vesting date.

~~We have a stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to an aggregate of 8.0 million shares of our Class B common stock.~~ There were no repurchases ~~under the program~~from employees in the three months ended October 31, ~~2017 or 2016. At~~2018.

As of October 31, ~~2017, 8.0 million shares remained available for repurchase under the stock repurchase program.~~

~~Our subsidiary,~~2018, IDT Telecom, Inc., or IDT Telecom, entered into a credit agreement ~~dated July 12, 2012,~~ with TD Bank, N.A. for a line of credit facility for up to a maximum principal amount of $25.0 million. IDT Telecom may use the proceeds to finance working capital requirements, acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes. The line of credit facility is secured by primarily all of IDT Telecom’s assets. The principal outstanding bears interest per annum at the ~~option of IDT Telecom, at either (a) the U.S. Prime Rate less 125 basis points, or (b) the~~ LIBOR rate adjusted by the Regulation D maximum reserve requirement plus ~~150~~125 basis points. Interest is payable monthly, and all outstanding principal and any accrued and unpaid interest is due on the maturity date of ~~April 30, 2018. At October 31, 2017 and~~ July ~~31, 2017, there were no amounts outstanding under the facility. We intend to borrow under the facility from time to time.~~15, 2019. IDT Telecom pays a quarterly unused commitment fee of ~~0.375%~~0.3% per annum on the average daily balance of the unused portion of the $25.0 million commitment. IDT Telecom is required to comply with various affirmative and negative covenants as well as maintain certain financial targets and ratios during the term of the line of credit, including IDT Telecom may not pay any dividend on its capital ~~stock and IDT Telecom’s aggregate loans and advances to affiliates or subsidiaries may not exceed $110.0 million.~~stock.

Other Sources and Uses of Resources

On April 16, 2018, our Board of Directors and its Corporate Governance Committee approved an arrangement with Howard S. Jonas related to the purchase of shares of our Class B common stock by Mr. Jonas. Under the arrangement, Mr. Jonas has agreed to purchase 2,546,689 shares of our Class B common stock at a price per share of $5.89, which was the closing price for the Class B common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on April 16, 2018 (the last closing price before approval of the arrangement) for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million. The arrangement is subject to approval of our stockholders at the annual meeting on December 13, 2018. Mr. Jonas has agreed to vote in favor of the arrangement when it is submitted to the stockholders. On May 31, 2018, Mr. Jonas paid $1.5 million of the purchase price. The purchase price will be reduced by approximately $0.2 million, which is the amount of dividends paid on 2,546,689 shares of our Class B common stock whose record date was between April 16, 2018 and the issuance of the shares. The remainder of the purchase price, or $13.3 million, will be payable following approval of our stockholders, and the shares will be issued upon payment in full.

On June 22, 2017, IDT Telecom ~~Inc.~~ entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with JAR Fintech Limited and JAR Capital Limited to sell the capital stock of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited, or IDTFS Holding, a company incorporated under the laws of Gibraltar and a wholly-owned subsidiary of IDT Telecom, to JAR Fintech Limited. ~~IDT Financial Services~~IDTFS Holding ~~Limited~~ is the sole shareholder of IDT Financial Services Limited, or IDTFS, our Gibraltar-based bank. The Share Purchase Agreement provides for an aggregate purchase price for the outstanding equity interests of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited of £2.9 million ($3.8 million at October 31, 2017) plus an amount equal to the value of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited’s net assets, to be paid at closing, subject to adjustments relating to customer assets of IDT Financial Services Holding Limited. The net asset value of IDT Financial Services Holding Limitedsale was $13.9 million at October 31, 2017. A portion of the purchase price will be placed in escrow and released to IDT Telecom once all of the conditions have been met under the Share Purchase Agreement. The sale is expected to close in the first quarter of calendar 2018, subject to regulatory approval and other ~~customary conditions set forth~~conditions. On October 25, 2018, JAR Fintech Limited notified us that it considers the agreement terminated by the effluxion of time. All parties have indicated that they remain interested in ~~the Share Purchase Agreement. The remaining closing conditions are outside of our control and there can be no assurance that~~consummating a transaction regarding the sale ~~will be completed.~~

~~We intend~~of IDTFS Holding and are working toward that goal while continuing to ~~spin-off our wholly-owned subsidiary, RHI, to our stockholders. RHI will own~~pursue the required regulatory approvals. The parties are negotiating certain ~~commercial real estate assets and interests in Rafael Pharma and Lipomedix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Prior~~changes to the ~~spin-off, we intend to contribute cash to RHI so that it holds $50 million to $60 million in cash.~~terms of the sale.

We intend to, where appropriate, make strategic investments and acquisitions to complement, expand, and/or enter into new businesses. In considering acquisitions and investments, we search for opportunities to profitably grow our existing businesses and/or to add qualitatively to the range and diversification of businesses in our portfolio. At this time, we cannot guarantee that we will be presented with acquisition opportunities that meet our return on investment criteria, or that our efforts to make acquisitions that meet our criteria will be successful.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

The following table quantifies our future contractual obligations and commercial commitments at October 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

Payments Due by Period (in millions)	Total		Less than 1 year		1–3 years		4–5 years		After 5 years		Total		Less than 1 year		1–3 years		4–5 years		After 5 years
Operating leases	$	6.5	$	2.9	$	2.1	$	0.7	$	0.8	$	19.1	$	5.2	$	6.7	$	4.1	$	3.1
Purchase commitments (1)		60.9		60.9		—		—		—		27.2		27.2		—		—		—

Total contractual obligations (2)	$	67.4	$	63.8	$	2.1	$	0.7	$	0.8	$	46.3	$	32.4	$	6.7	$	4.1	$	3.1

(1)

Purchase commitments include the aggregate commitment under the Reciprocal Services Agreement with a telecom operator in Central America for a full range of services, including, but not limited to, termination of inbound and outbound international long-distance voice calls.

(2)

The above table does not include an aggregate of ~~$15.1~~$16.5 million in performance bonds due to the uncertainty of the amount and/or timing of any such payments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements,” as defined in relevant SEC regulations that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources, other than the following.

In connection with ~~our spin-off of Genie Energy Ltd., or Genie,~~the Rafael Spin-Off in ~~October 2011,~~March 2018, we and ~~Genie~~Rafael entered into various agreements prior to the spin-off including a Separation and Distribution Agreement to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationship with ~~Genie~~Rafael after the spin-off, and a Tax Separation Agreement, which sets forth the responsibilities of us and ~~Genie~~Rafael with respect to, among other things, liabilities for federal, state, local and foreign taxes for periods before and including the spin-off, the preparation and filing of tax returns for such periods and disputes with taxing authorities regarding taxes for such periods. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, ~~among other things,~~ we indemnify ~~Genie~~Rafael and ~~Genie~~Rafael indemnifies us for losses related to the failure of the other to pay, perform or otherwise discharge, any of the liabilities and obligations set forth in the agreement. Pursuant to the Tax Separation Agreement, ~~among other things,~~ we indemnify ~~Genie~~Rafael from all liability for taxes of ours, ~~with respect to~~other than Rafael and its subsidiaries, for any taxable period, and ~~Genie indemnifies us~~ from all liability for taxes ~~of Genie and its subsidiaries with respect~~due to ~~any taxable period, including, without limitation,~~ the ~~ongoing tax audits related to Genie’s business.~~spin-off.

In connection with our spin-off of Straight Path, in July 2013, we and Straight Path entered into various agreements prior to the spin-off including a Separation and Distribution Agreement to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationship with Straight Path after the spin-off, and a Tax Separation Agreement, which sets forth the responsibilities of us and Straight Path with respect to, among other things, liabilities for federal, state, local and foreign taxes for periods before and including the spin-off, the preparation and filing of tax returns for such periods and disputes with taxing authorities regarding taxes for such periods. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, we indemnify Straight Path and Straight Path indemnifies us for losses related to the failure of the other to pay, perform or otherwise discharge, any of the liabilities and obligations set forth in the agreement. Pursuant to the Tax Separation Agreement, we indemnify Straight Path from all liability for taxes of Straight Path or any of its subsidiaries or relating to the Straight Path business with respect to taxable periods ending on or before the spin-off, from all liability for taxes of ours, other than Straight Path and its subsidiaries, for any taxable period, and from all liability for taxes due to the spin-off. (See Note 1115 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 to Part I of ~~the~~this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).

In connection with our spin-off of Zedge, Inc., or Zedge, in June 2016, we and Zedge entered into various agreements prior to the spin-off including a Separation and Distribution Agreement to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationship with Zedge after the spin-off, and a Tax Separation Agreement, which sets forth the responsibilities of us and Zedge with respect to, among other things, liabilities for federal, state, local and foreign taxes for periods before and including the spin-off, the preparation and filing of tax returns for such periods and disputes with taxing authorities regarding taxes for such periods. Pursuant to Separation and Distribution Agreement, among other things, we indemnify Zedge and Zedge indemnifies us for losses related to the failure of the other to pay, perform or otherwise discharge, any of the liabilities and obligations set forth in the agreement. Pursuant to the Tax Separation Agreement, among other things, Zedge indemnifies us from all liability for taxes of Zedge and any of Zedge’s subsidiaries or relating to Zedge’s business accruing after the spin-off, and we indemnify Zedge from all liability for taxes of Zedge and any of Zedge’s subsidiaries or relating to Zedge’s business with respect to taxable periods ending on or before the spin-off.

~~IDT Payment Services and IDT Telecom~~We have performance bonds issued through third parties for the benefit of various states in order to comply with the states’ financial requirements for money remittance licenses and telecommunications ~~resellers, respectively.~~resellers. At October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we had aggregate performance bonds of ~~$15.1~~$16.5 million outstanding.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

Foreign Currency Risk

Revenues from our international operations were ~~33%~~35% and ~~31%~~33% of our consolidated revenues for the three months ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. A significant portion of these revenues is in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Our foreign currency exchange risk is somewhat mitigated by our ability to offset a portion of these ~~non U.S.~~non-U.S. Dollar-denominated revenues with operating expenses that are paid in the same currencies. While the impact from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates affects our revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies, the net amount of our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate changes at the end of each reporting period is generally not material.

Investment Risk

In addition to, but separate from our primary business, we hold a portion of our assets in marketable securities and hedge funds for strategic and speculative purposes. As of October 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the carrying value of our marketable securities and investments in hedge funds was ~~$54.3~~$2.5 million and ~~$8.6~~$4.8 million, respectively. Investments in marketable securities and hedge funds carry a degree of risk and depend to a great extent on correct assessments of the future course of price movements of securities and other instruments. There can be no assurance that our investment managers will be able to accurately predict these price movements. The securities markets have in recent years been characterized by great volatility and unpredictability. Accordingly, the value of our investments may go down as well as up and we may not receive the amounts originally invested upon redemption.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 31, ~~2017~~2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Legal proceedings in which we are involved are more fully described in Note 1115 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 to Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information with respect to purchases by us of our shares during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2018:~~2019:

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased Average
Price
per Share Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs (1)
August 1-31, 2017 — $ — — 8,000,000
September 1–30, 2017 (2) 1,542 $ 14.11 — 8,000,000
October 1–31, 2017 (2) 126 $ 14.27 — 8,000,000
Total 1,668 $ 14.12 —

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
August 1-31, 2018		551,669	$	5.25		551,669		7,080,847
September 1–30, 2018		135,198	$	5.27		135,198		6,945,649
October 1–31, 2018		42,243	$	5.29		42,243		6,903,406

Total		729,110	$	5.26		729,110

(1)

On January 22, 2016, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program to purchase up to 8.0 million shares of our Class B common ~~stock and cancelled the previous stock repurchase program originally approved by the Board of Directors on June 13, 2006, which had 4,636,741 shares remaining available for repurchase.~~stock.

~~(2)~~

Consists of shares of Class B common stock that were tendered by employees of ours to satisfy the employees’ tax withholding obligations in connection with the lapsing of restrictions on awards of restricted stock. Such shares were repurchased by us based on their fair market value on the trading day immediately prior to the vesting date and the proceeds utilized to pay the taxes due upon such vesting event.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5.

Other Information

None

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Filed or furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	IDT~~Corporation~~ CORPORATION

December ~~11, 2017~~10, 2018	By:	/s/Shmuel Jonas
		Shmuel Jonas Chief Executive Officer

December ~~11, 2017~~10, 2018	By:	/s/Marcelo Fischer
		Marcelo Fischer Senior Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer)

Delaware		22-3415036
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

520 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey		07102
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐☒

Emerging growth company	☐


Class A common stock, $.01 par value:	1,574,326 shares outstanding (excluding 1,698,000 treasury shares)
Class B common stock, $.01 par value:	~~23,266,555~~22,143,898 shares outstanding (excluding ~~2,298,593~~3,450,600 treasury shares)

	October 31, 2017			July 31, 2017
	(Unaudited)			(Note 1)
	(in thousands)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	52,755		$	90,344
Marketable securities		54,291			58,272
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,408 at October 31, 2017 and $2,657 at July 31, 2017		78,949			64,979
Prepaid expenses		15,796			14,506
Other current assets		29,961			18,749
Assets held for sale		110,666			124,267
Total current assets		342,418			371,117
Property, plant and equipment, net		88,617			88,994
Goodwill		11,303			11,326
Investments		26,390			26,894
Deferred income tax assets, net		10,524			11,841
Other assets		3,774			3,657
Assets held for sale		5,146			5,134
Total assets	$	488,172		$	518,963
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable	$	47,220		$	40,989
Accrued expenses		109,155			125,359
Deferred revenue		74,849			76,451
Other current liabilities		5,272			4,659
Liabilities held for sale		101,943			115,318
Total current liabilities		338,439			362,776
Other liabilities		1,169			1,080
Liabilities held for sale		515			550
Total liabilities		340,123			364,406
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
IDT Corporation stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—10,000; no shares issued		—			—
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—35,000; 3,272 shares issued and 1,574 shares outstanding at October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017		33			33
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—200,000; 25,566 and 25,561 shares issued and 23,267 and 23,264 shares outstanding at October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017, respectively		256			256
Additional paid-in capital		395,272			394,462
Treasury stock, at cost, consisting of 1,698 and 1,698 shares of Class A common stock and 2,299 and 2,297 shares of Class B common stock at October 31, 2017 and July 31, 2017, respectively		(83,327	)		(83,304	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,741	)		(2,343	)
Accumulated deficit		(170,182	)		(163,370	)
Total IDT Corporation stockholders’ equity		139,311			145,734
Noncontrolling interests		8,738			8,823
Total equity		148,049			154,557
Total liabilities and equity	$	488,172		$	518,963

	October 31, 2018			July 31, 2018
	(Unaudited)			(Note 1)
	(in thousands)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	59,313		$	68,089
Debt securities		2,237			5,612
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,103 at October 31, 2018 and $3,166 at July 31, 2018		66,094			69,481
Prepaid expenses		23,132			19,550
Other current assets		34,333			28,877
Assets held for sale		138,466			137,272
Total current assets		323,575			328,881
Property, plant and equipment, net		36,808			36,068
Goodwill		11,246			11,315
Other intangibles, net		4,238			306
Equity investments		7,827			6,633
Deferred income tax assets, net		4,598			5,668
Other assets		5,634			5,020
Assets held for sale		5,920			5,706
Total assets	$	399,846		$	399,597

Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable	$	56,441		$	45,124
Accrued expenses		120,843			129,818
Deferred revenue		45,116			55,003
Other current liabilities		8,817			8,269
Liabilities held for sale		130,550			128,770
Total current liabilities		361,767			366,984
Other liabilities		906			768
Liabilities held for sale		497			542
Total liabilities		363,170			368,294
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
IDT Corporation stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—10,000; no shares issued		—			—
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—35,000; 3,272 shares issued and 1,574 shares outstanding at October 31, 2018 and July 31, 2018		33			33
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—200,000; 25,594 and 25,594 shares issued and 22,143 and 22,872 shares outstanding at October 31, 2018 and July 31, 2018, respectively		256			256
Additional paid-in capital		294,460			294,047
Treasury stock, at cost, consisting of 1,698 and 1,698 shares of Class A common stock and 3,451 and 2,722 shares of Class B common stock at October 31, 2018 and July 31, 2018, respectively		(89,451	)		(85,597	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(4,417	)		(4,972	)
Accumulated deficit		(164,806	)		(173,103	)
Total IDT Corporation stockholders’ equity		36,075			30,664
Noncontrolling interests		601			639
Total equity		36,676			31,303
Total liabilities and equity	$	399,846		$	399,597

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive ~~(Loss) Income~~Loss	3

	Consolidated Statements of Equity	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	45

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	56

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1723

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks	2734

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2734

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		2835

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2835

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2835

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2835

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2835

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	2835

Item 5.	Other Information	2835

Item 6.	Exhibits	2935

SIGNATURES		3036

	Three Months Ended October 31, 2018 (in thousands)
	IDT Corporation Stockholders
	Class A Common Stock		Class B Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity

BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2018	$	33	$	256	$	294,047	$	(85,597	)	$	(4,972	)	$	(173,103	)	$	639		$	31,303
Adjustment from the adoption of change in revenue recognition (see Note 2)		—		—		—		—			—			8,606			—			8,606
Adjustment from the adoption of change in accounting for equity investments (see Note 8)		—		—		—		—			33			1,140			—			1,173
ADJUSTED BALANCE AT AUGUST 1, 2018		33		256		294,047		(85,597	)		(4,939	)		(163,357	)		639			41,082
Repurchases of Class B common stock through repurchase program		—		—		—		(3,854	)		—			—			—			(3,854	)
Stock-based compensation		—		—		413		—			—			—			—			413
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—			—			—			(339	)		(339	)
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—		—			522			—			—			522
Net loss		—		—		—		—			—			(1,449	)		301			(1,148	)
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 31, 2018	$	33	$	256	$	294,460	$	(89,451	)	$	(4,417	)	$	(164,806	)	$	601		$	36,676

	Three Months Ended October 31, 2017 (in thousands)
	IDT Corporation Stockholders
	Class A Common Stock		Class B Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2017	$	33	$	256	$	394,462	$	(83,304	)	$	(2,343	)	$	(163,370	)	$	8,823		$	154,557
Dividends declared ($0.19 per share)		—		—		—		—			—			(4,720	)		—			(4,720	)
Restricted Class B common stock purchased from employees		—		—		—		(23	)		—			—			—			(23	)
Stock-based compensation		—		—		810		—			—			—			—			810
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—			—			—			(380	)		(380	)
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		—		—			(398	)		—			—			(398	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—			—			(2,092	)		295			(1,797	)
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 31, 2017	$	33	$	256	$	395,272	$	(83,327	)	$	(2,741	)	$	(170,182	)	$	8,738		$	148,049

	Three Months Ended October 31,
	2018		2017
	(in thousands)
Core Operations:
Boss Revolution Calling	$	123,513	$	132,184
Carrier Services		142,222		168,831
Mobile Top-Up		65,346		61,483
Other		14,595		18,027
Growth		6,173		4,557
Total Telecom & Payment Services		351,849		385,082
net2phone-UCaaS		4,805		2,398
net2phone-Platform Services		5,662		5,390
Total net2phone		10,467		7,788
All Other		—		685
Total	$	362,316	$	393,555

Trade accounts receivable	$	370
Prepaid expenses		65
Property, plant and equipment		1,826
Non-compete agreement		600
Customer relationships		2,930
Tradename		490
Other assets		486
Trade accounts payable		(81	)
Accrued expenses		(523	)
Other liabilities		(710	)
Net assets excluding cash acquired	$	5,453
Supplemental information:
Cash paid	$	5,870
Cash acquired		(417	)
Total consideration, net of cash acquired	$	5,453

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
October 31, 2017:
Certificates of deposit*	$	31,908	$	2	$	(2	)	$	31,908
Federal Government Sponsored Enterprise notes		3,217		—		(17	)		3,200
International agency notes		402		—		(3	)		399
Mutual funds		5,391		56		—			5,447
Corporate bonds		3,379		—		(4	)		3,375
Equity		75		—		(6	)		69
U.S. Treasury notes		5,396		—		(22	)		5,374
Municipal bonds		4,519		3		(3	)		4,519
Total	$	54,287	$	61	$	(57	)	$	54,291
July 31, 2017:
Certificates of deposit*	$	29,011	$	1	$	(7	)	$	29,005
Federal Government Sponsored Enterprise notes		3,992		—		(14	)		3,978
International agency notes		291		—		—			291
Mutual funds		5,353		77		—			5,430
Corporate bonds		4,643		—		—			4,643
Equity		74		—		(26	)		48
U.S. Treasury notes		6,673		—		—			6,673
Municipal bonds		8,201		4		(1	)		8,204
Total	$	58,238	$	82	$	(48	)	$	58,272

	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
October 31, 2017:
Certificates of deposit	$	2	$	7,040
Federal Government Sponsored Enterprise notes		17		3,200
International agency notes		3		399
Corporate bonds		4		2,737
Equity		6		69
U.S. Treasury notes		22		5,374
Municipal bonds		3		3,998
Total	$	57	$	22,817
July 31, 2017:
Certificates of deposit	$	7	$	12,155
Federal Government Sponsored Enterprise notes		14		3,529
Equity		26		48
Municipal bonds		1		3,349
Total	$	48	$	19,081

	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
October 31, 2018:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	2	$	1,695
Municipal bonds		1		542
Total	$	3	$	2,237
July 31, 2018:
U.S. Treasury notes	$	1	$	1,692

	Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in thousands)

Federal Government Sponsored Enterprise notes	$	8	$	1,362

	Carrying Value
	(in thousands)
Balance, August 1, 2018	$	1,883
Adoption of change in accounting for equity investments		1,213
Adjusted balance, August 1, 2018		3,096
Adjustment for observable transactions involving a similar investment from the same issuer		22
Impairments		—
Balance, October 31, 2018	$	3,118

	Level 1 (1)		Level 2 (2)		Level 3 (3)		Total
	(in thousands)
October 31, 2017
Available-for-sale securities:
Marketable securities	$	10,891	$	43,400	$	—	$	54,291
Rafael Pharma Series D Note		—		—		6,300		6,300
Total	$	10,891	$	43,400	$	6,300	$	60,591
July 31, 2017
Available-for-sale securities:
Marketable securities	$	12,151	$	46,121	$	—	$	58,272
Rafael Pharma Series D Note		—		—		6,300		6,300
Total	$	12,151	$	46,121	$	6,300	$	64,572

	Three Months Ended October 31, 2017
	Attributable to IDT Corporation			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
	(in thousands)
Balance, July 31, 2017	$	145,734		$	8,823		$	154,557
Dividends declared ($0.19 per share)		(4,720	)		—			(4,720	)
Restricted Class B common stock purchased from employees		(23	)		—			(23	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—			(380	)		(380	)
Stock-based compensation		810			—			810
Comprehensive income:
Net loss		(2,092	)		295			(1,797	)
Other comprehensive loss		(398	)		—			(398	)
Comprehensive income		(2,490	)		295			(2,195	)
Balance, October 31, 2017	$	139,311		$	8,738		$	148,049

	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available-for-Sale Securities			Foreign Currency Translation			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Location of (Gain) Loss Recognized
	(in thousands)
Balance, July 31, 2017	$	2,134		$	(4,477	)	$	(2,343	)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to IDT Corporation before reclassifications		(23	)		(368	)		(391	)
Less: reclassification for gain included in net loss		(7	)		—			(7	)	Other (expense) income, net
Net other comprehensive loss attributable to IDT Corporation		(30	)		(368	)		(398	)
Balance, October 31, 2017	$	2,104		$	(4,845	)	$	(2,741	)

	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available-for-Sale Securities			Foreign Currency Translation			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	(in thousands)
Balance, July 31, 2018	$	(34	)	$	(4,938	)	$	(4,972	)
Adjustment from the adoption of change in accounting for equity investments (see Note 8)		33			—			33
Adjusted balance, August 1, 2018		(1	)		(4,938	)		(4,939	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income attributable to IDT Corporation		(2	)		524			522
Balance, October 31, 2018	$	(3	)	$	(4,414	)	$	(4,417	)

(in thousands)	Telecom Platform Services		net2phone-UCaaS			All Other			Corporate			Total			Telecom & Payment Services		net2phone			All Other			Corporate			Total
Three Months Ended October 31, 2018
Revenues															$	351,849	$	10,467		$	—		$	—		$	362,316
Income (loss) from operations																5,269		(1,500	)		—			(2,487	)		1,282
Other operating expense																—		—			—			(195	)		(195	)

Three Months Ended October 31, 2017
Revenues	$	385,063	$	7,788		$	704		$	—		$	393,555		$	385,082	$	7,788		$	685		$	—		$	393,555
Income (loss) from operations		4,561		(674	)		(631	)		(3,173	)		83			4,423		(674	)		(547	)		(3,119	)		83
Severance		409		—			—			30			439			409		—			—			30			439
Other operating expense		—		—			—			(779	)		(779	)		—		—			—			(779	)		(779	)

Three Months Ended October 31, 2016
Revenues	$	361,511	$	7,136		$	504		$	—		$	369,151
Income (loss) from operations		6,544		(174	)		90			(1,274	)		5,186
Other operating expense		—		—			—			(199	)		(199	)