UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



þ☑	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020



¨☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission file number: 001-31775

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, ~~INC.~~INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Maryland		86-1062192
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS employer identification number)

14185 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1100
Dallas
Texas		75254
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

~~(972)~~ (972) 490-9600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þYes¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). þYes¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	¨	☐	Accelerated filer	þ☑
Non-accelerated filer	¨	~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~☐	Smaller reporting company	¨☐
			Emerging growth company	¨☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) ifof the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨☐ Yes þ No

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock	AHT	New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series D	AHT-PD	New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series F	AHT-PF	New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series G	AHT-PG	New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series H	AHT-PH	New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series I	AHT-PI	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share		~~97,416,095~~105,261,331
(Class)		Outstanding at ~~November 3, 2017~~May 22, 2020

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, ~~INC~~INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2017~~

MARCH 31, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019	2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~2019	3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~2019	4
Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Equity for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and 2019	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~2019	67
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	89
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	3132
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	49
~~ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~	49
~~PART II. OTHER INFORMATION~~
~~ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS~~	50
ITEM ~~1A. RISK FACTORS~~4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	50
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	51
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	51
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	5156
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	5156
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	5156
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	5156
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	5257
SIGNATURES	5358

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Assets
ASSETS
Investments in hotel properties, net	$	4,064,555		$	4,160,563		$	4,024,176		$	4,108,443
Cash and cash equivalents	393,527			347,091			240,316			262,636
Restricted cash	133,127			144,014			126,649			135,571
Marketable securities	11,960			53,185			437			14,591
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $609 and $690, respectively	61,677			44,629
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $794 and $698, respectively							29,129			39,638
Inventories	4,384			4,530			4,288			4,346
Investment in unconsolidated entities	5,240			58,779
Notes receivable, net							7,844			7,709
Investment in unconsolidated entity							2,801			2,829
Deferred costs, net	2,845			2,846			2,786			2,897
Prepaid expenses	24,198			17,578			28,329			21,886
Derivative assets, net	1,721			3,614			1,629			1,691
Operating lease right-of-use assets							45,576			49,995
Other assets	14,225			11,718			27,783			17,932
Intangible assets, net	9,972			10,061
Intangible assets							797			797
Due from related parties, net							4,399			3,019
Due from third-party hotel managers	19,230			13,348			19,183			17,368
Assets held for sale	—			19,588
Total assets	$	4,746,661		$	4,891,544		$	4,566,122		$	4,691,348
Liabilities and Equity
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Indebtedness, net	$	3,698,869		$	3,723,559		$	4,103,658		$	4,106,518
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	153,772			126,986			135,993			134,341
Dividends and distributions payable	25,520			24,765			11,740			20,849
Unfavorable management contract liabilities	345			1,380
Due to Ashford Inc., net	13,689			15,716			5,229			6,570
Due to Ashford Prime OP, net	—			488
Due to related party, net	326			1,001
Due to third-party hotel managers	2,627			2,714			3,021			2,509
Intangible liabilities, net	15,928			16,195			2,317			2,337
Operating lease liabilities							45,747			53,270
Derivative liabilities, net	146			—			350			42
Other liabilities	18,203			16,548			25,168			25,776
Liabilities related to assets held for sale	—			37,047
Total liabilities	3,929,425			3,966,399			4,333,223			4,352,212
Commitments and contingencies (note 13)
Commitments and contingencies (note 16)
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	117,434			132,768			35,229			69,870
Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock, 0 and 1,657,206 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	—			17
Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, 7,904,353 and 9,468,706 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	79			95
Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock, 4,800,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	48			48
Series G Cumulative Preferred Stock, 6,200,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	62			62
Series H Cumulative Preferred Stock, 3,800,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	38			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, 97,416,095 and 96,376,827 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	974			964
Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, 2,389,393 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019							24			24
Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock, 4,800,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019							48			48
Series G Cumulative Preferred Stock, 6,200,000 shares issued and outstanding at March31, 2020 and December 31, 2019							62			62
Series H Cumulative Preferred Stock, 3,800,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019							38			38
Series I Cumulative Preferred Stock, 5,400,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019							54			54
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, 105,115,965 and 102,103,602 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively							1,051			1,021
Additional paid-in capital	1,783,912			1,764,450			1,829,396			1,825,553
Accumulated deficit	(1,086,071		)	(974,015		)	(1,633,459		)	(1,558,038		)
Total stockholders’ equity of the Company	699,042			791,621			197,214			268,762
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	760			756
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities							456			504
Total equity	699,802			792,377			197,670			269,266
Total liabilities and equity	$	4,746,661		$	4,891,544		$	4,566,122		$	4,691,348

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2020			2019
Revenue
REVENUE
Rooms	$	289,017		$	300,875		$	876,927		$	917,396		$	215,807		$	280,381
Food and beverage	48,313			56,206			175,005			188,467			47,950			61,061
Other hotel revenue	15,006			14,389			43,720			43,213			17,348			16,204
Total hotel revenue	352,336			371,470			1,095,652			1,149,076			281,105			357,646
Other	989			461			2,052			1,297			772			1,072
Total revenue	353,325			371,931			1,097,704			1,150,373			281,877			358,718
Expenses
EXPENSES
Hotel operating expenses:
Rooms	63,950			65,474			188,857			195,769			52,466			60,647
Food and beverage	37,173			41,086			121,619			129,606			34,901			41,323
Other expenses	112,421			114,377			337,978			347,126			103,794			113,527
Management fees	13,027			13,616			40,100			42,191			10,549			12,989
Total hotel expenses	226,571			234,553			688,554			714,692			201,710			228,486
Property taxes, insurance, and other	18,194			17,172			55,293			55,077
Property taxes, insurance and other													20,472			20,397
Depreciation and amortization	60,135			60,170			185,380			182,411			66,350			67,178
Impairment charges	1,785			4,922			1,785			4,695			27,613			—
Transaction costs	—			124			11			201
Advisory services fee	14,612			11,948			39,482			34,927			15,299			16,304
Corporate general and administrative	2,412			1,968			10,836			6,426
Corporate, general and administrative													3,492			2,601
Total expenses	323,709			330,857			981,341			998,429			334,936			334,966
Operating income (loss)	29,616			41,074			116,363			151,944
Gain (loss) on sale of assets and hotel properties													3,623			233
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)													(49,436		)	23,985
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities	(679		)	(560		)	(3,580		)	(4,432		)	(79		)	(1,063		)
Interest income	706			92			1,460			229			611			781
Gain (loss) on sale of hotel properties	15			1,448			14,024			24,428
Other income (expense)	(273		)	(926		)	(3,539		)	(4,263		)	1,522			(316		)
Interest expense and amortization of premiums and loan costs	(56,963		)	(55,762		)	(167,224		)	(168,167		)	(57,085		)	(66,166		)
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees	—			(972		)	(1,629		)	(4,913		)	(95		)	(2,062		)
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities	(936		)	—			(4,813		)	—			(1,477		)	808
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	(1,479		)	(9,548		)	(1,804		)	4,248			4,422			(2,994		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(29,993		)	(25,154		)	(50,742		)	(926		)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES													(101,617		)	(47,027		)
Income tax (expense) benefit	1,267			16			507			(1,216		)	(303		)	405
Net income (loss)	(28,726		)	(25,138		)	(50,235		)	(2,142		)
(Income) loss from consolidated entities attributable to noncontrolling interest	(22		)	(16		)	(4		)	16
NET INCOME (LOSS)													(101,920		)	(46,622		)
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities													48			26
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	6,940			5,009			13,202			2,745			17,671			8,579
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	(21,808		)	(20,145		)	(37,037		)	619
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY													(84,201		)	(38,017		)
Preferred dividends	(11,440		)	(8,875		)	(33,352		)	(25,856		)	(10,644		)	(10,644		)
Extinguishment of issuance costs upon redemption of preferred stock	(4,507		)	(6,124		)	(4,507		)	(6,124		)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(37,755	)	$	(35,144	)	$	(74,896	)	$	(31,361	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS													$	(94,845	)	$	(48,661	)

Income (loss) per share - basic and diluted:
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
Basic:
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.80	)	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.94	)	$	(0.49	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic	95,332			94,531			95,169			94,384			100,470			99,407
Diluted:
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.80	)	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.94	)	$	(0.49	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted	95,332			94,531			95,169			94,384			100,470			99,407

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.12		$	0.12		$	0.36		$	0.36

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited, in thousands)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2020			2019
Net income (loss)	$	(28,726	)	$	(25,138	)	$	(50,235	)	$	(2,142	)	$	(101,920	)	$	(46,622	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	—			—			—			—			—			—
Comprehensive income (loss)	(28,726		)	(25,138		)	(50,235		)	(2,142		)	(101,920		)	(46,622		)
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities	(22		)	(16		)	(4		)	16			48			26
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	6,940			5,009			13,202			2,745			17,671			8,579
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company	$	(21,808	)	$	(20,145	)	$	(37,037	)	$	619		$	(84,201	)	$	(38,017	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(unaudited, in ~~thousands)~~thousands except per share amounts)

Preferred Stock
Additional
Paid In
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Noncontrolling
Interests In
Consolidated
Entities
Total
Redeemable Noncontrolling
Interests in
Operating
Partnership
Series A Series D Series F Series G Series H Common Stock
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
Balance at January 1, 2017 1,657
$ 17
9,469
$ 95
4,800
$ 48
6,200
$ 62
$ —
$ —
96,377
$ 964
$ 1,764,450
$ (974,015 ) $ 756
$ 792,377
$ 132,768
Purchases of common stock —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(203 ) (2 ) (1,271 ) —
—
(1,273 ) —
Equity-based compensation —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5,002
—
—
5,002
3,749
Forfeitures of restricted shares —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(49 ) —
—
—
—
—
—
Issuance of restricted shares/units —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,271
12
(12 ) —
—
—
94
Redemption of preferred shares (1,657 ) (17 ) (1,565 ) (16 ) —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(76,014 ) (4,507 ) —
(80,554 ) —
Issuances of preferred shares —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,800
38
—
—
91,596
—
—
91,634
—
Dividends declared - common shares —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(35,319 ) —
(35,319 ) —
Dividends declared - preferred shares- Series A —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,539 ) —
(2,539 ) —
Dividends declared - preferred shares- Series D —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(14,891 ) —
(14,891 ) —
Dividends declared – preferred shares- Series F —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(6,637 ) —
(6,637 ) —
Dividends declared – preferred shares- Series G —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(8,573 ) —
(8,573 ) —
Dividends declared – preferred shares- Series H —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(712 ) —
(712 ) —
Distributions to noncontrolling interests —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(7,655 )
Redemption/conversion of operating partnership units —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
—
161
—
—
161
(161 )
Redemption value adjustment —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,841 ) —
(1,841 ) 1,841
Net income (loss) —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(37,037 ) 4
(37,033 ) (13,202 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 —
$ —
7,904
$ 79
4,800
$ 48
6,200
$ 62
3,800
$ 38
97,416
$ 974
$ 1,783,912
$ (1,086,071 ) $ 760
$ 699,802
$ 117,434



	Preferred Stock																				Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests In Consolidated Entities			Total			Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
	Series D			Series F			Series G			Series H			Series I			Common Stock
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance at December 31, 2019	2,389	$	24	4,800	$	48	6,200	$	62	3,800	$	38	5,400	$	54	102,104		$	1,021		$	1,825,553		$	(1,558,038	)	$	504		$	269,266		$	69,870
Purchases of common stock	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(246	)	(3		)	(355		)	—			—			(358		)	—
Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			3,272			—			—			3,272			1,634
Forfeitures of restricted shares	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(30	)	—			—			—			—			—			—
Issuance of restricted shares/units	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		1,333		13			(13		)	—			—			—			—
PSU dividend claw back upon cancellation	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			378			—			378			—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series D ($.53/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(1,262		)	—			(1,262		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series F ($.46/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(2,212		)	—			(2,212		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series G ($.46/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(2,858		)	—			(2,858		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series H ($.47/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(1,781		)	—			(1,781		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series I ($.47/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(2,531		)	—			(2,531		)	—
Conversion of operating partnership units	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		1,955		20			939			—			—			959			(959		)
Performance LTIP dividend claw back upon cancellation	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			—			—			—			1,401
Redemption value adjustment	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			19,046			—			19,046			(19,046		)
Net income (loss)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(84,201		)	(48		)	(84,249		)	(17,671		)
Balance at March 31, 2020	2,389	$	24	4,800	$	48	6,200	$	62	3,800	$	38	5,400	$	54	105,116		$	1,051		$	1,829,396		$	(1,633,459	)	$	456		$	197,670		$	35,229



	Preferred Stock																				Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests In Consolidated Entities			Total			Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
	Series D			Series F			Series G			Series H			Series I			Common Stock
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance at December 31, 2018	2,389	$	24	4,800	$	48	6,200	$	62	3,800	$	38	5,400	$	54	101,036		$	1,010		$	1,814,273		$	(1,363,020	)	$	616		$	453,105		$	80,743
Impact of adoption of new accounting standard	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			1,755			—			1,755			—
Purchases of common stock	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(187	)	(1		)	(902		)	—			—			(903		)	—
Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			2,788			—			—			2,788			1,802
Forfeitures of restricted shares	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(6	)	—			—			—			—			—			—
Issuance of restricted shares/units	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		1,323		13			(13		)	—			—			—			23
Common stock issuance costs	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			(200		)	—			—			(200		)	—
Issuance of common units for hotel acquisition	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			—			—			—			7,854
Dividends declared – common stock ($.12/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(12,450		)	—			(12,450		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series D ($.53/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(1,262		)	—			(1,262		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series F ($.46/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(2,212		)	—			(2,212		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series G ($.46/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(2,858		)	—			(2,858		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series H ($.47/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(1,781		)	—			(1,781		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred stock - Series I ($.47/share)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(2,531		)	—			(2,531		)	—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2,623		)
Redemption value adjustment	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(22,760		)	—			(22,760		)	22,760
Net income (loss)	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—		—			—			(38,017		)	(26		)	(38,043		)	(8,579		)
Balance at March 31, 2019	2,389	$	24	4,800	$	48	6,200	$	62	3,800	$	38	5,400	$	54	102,166		$	1,022		$	1,815,946		$	(1,445,136	)	$	590		$	372,648		$	101,980

See Notes to Consolidated Financial ~~Statements.~~Statements

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2020			2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(50,235	)	$	(2,142	)	$	(101,920	)	$	(46,622	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flow from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	185,380			182,411			66,350			67,178
Impairment charges	1,785			4,695			27,613			—
Amortization of intangibles	(178		)	(157		)	(69		)	(59		)
Recognition of deferred income	(593		)	—			(237		)	(222		)
Write-off of intangibles	—			564
Bad debt expense	1,441			863			682			567
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)	(1,683		)	—			(321		)	(697		)
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities	3,580			4,432			79			1,063
(Gain) loss on sale of hotel properties, net	(14,024		)	(24,428		)
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and hotel properties							(3,623		)	(233		)
Realized and unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities	3,991			—			(627		)	(804		)
Purchases of marketable securities	(38,889		)	—			(452		)	(1,325		)
Sales of marketable securities	76,123			—			15,233			12,395
Net settlement of trading derivatives	(3,840		)	(3,259		)	4,630			(2,675		)
Payments for derivatives	—			(230		)
Realized and unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives	6,512			(823		)	(4,197		)	3,157
Amortization of loan costs and premiums, write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees	10,783			21,340
Amortization of loan costs and premiums and write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees							6,603			9,255
Equity-based compensation	8,751			5,511			4,906			4,590
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of effect of dispositions of hotel properties:
Amortization of parking asset							117			—
Non-cash interest income							(208		)	—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of the effect of acquisitions and dispositions of hotel properties:
Accounts receivable and inventories	(14,169		)	(19,190		)	9,738			(29,314		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(6,311		)	(13,849		)	(11,344		)	(5,162		)
Operating lease right-of-use asset							265			(1,863		)
Operating lease liability							(162		)	514
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	18,573			26,751			1,440			21,195
Due to/from related party	(734		)	(940		)
Due to/from related parties							(1,380		)	(2,327		)
Due to/from third-party hotel managers	(5,969		)	7,405			(1,303		)	(3,470		)
Due to/from Ashford Prime OP, net	(488		)	535
Due to/from Ashford Inc., net	(2,027		)	384			(632		)	861
Other assets	(541		)	—
Other liabilities	1,213			1,150			692			777
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	178,451			191,023			11,873			26,779
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Investment in unconsolidated entity	(983		)	(2,000		)	(51		)	(299		)
Proceeds from payments on note receivable	—			184
Acquisition of hotel properties and assets, net of cash acquired	(110		)	(2,106		)
Proceeds from franchise agreement							—			4,000
Acquisition of hotel properties and assets, net of cash and restricted cash acquired							—			(212,791		)
Improvements and additions to hotel properties	(164,075		)	(137,897		)	(20,365		)	(37,982		)
Net proceeds from sales of assets/properties	105,267			168,831
Liquidation of AQUA U.S. Fund	50,942			—
Net proceeds from sales of assets and hotel properties							4,654			5,000
Payments for initial franchise fees	(225		)	(30		)	—			(200		)
Proceeds from property insurance	2,369			268			147			198
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(6,815		)	27,250			(15,615		)	(242,074		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Borrowings on indebtedness	180,800			37,500			37,000			385,000
Repayments of indebtedness	(246,139		)	(141,528		)	(45,287		)	(179,554		)
Payments for loan costs and exit fees	(5,813		)	(5,119		)	(1,176		)	(8,916		)
Payments for dividends and distributions	(75,571		)	(69,328		)	(17,974		)	(24,959		)
Purchases of common stock	(1,273		)	(732		)	—			(903		)
Redemption of preferred stock	(80,554		)	(115,750		)
Payments for derivatives	(633		)	(104		)	(63		)	(296		)
Proceeds from preferred stock offering	91,634			115,769
Common stock offering costs							—			(200		)
Other	94			66			—			23
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(137,455		)	(179,226		)	(27,500		)	170,195
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	34,181			39,047			(31,242		)	(45,100		)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	492,473			368,758			398,207			439,812
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and at end of period	$	526,654		$	407,805		$	366,965		$	394,712


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016		2020			2019
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Interest paid	$	158,443	$	152,378	$	51,272		$	57,457
Income taxes paid	1,610		1,611
Income taxes paid (refunded)					(87		)	46
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activity
Accrued but unpaid capital expenditures	$	18,300	$	9,941	$	18,714		$	27,390
Common stock purchases accrued but not paid					358			—
Issuance of units for hotel acquisition					—			7,854
Assumption of debt in hotel acquisition					—			24,922
Dividends and distributions declared but not paid	25,520		22,547		11,740			27,552
Accrued but unpaid financing costs					4,994			—
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	$	347,091	$	215,078	$	262,636		$	319,210
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period included in assets held for sale	976		—
Restricted cash at beginning of period	144,014		153,680		135,571			120,602
Restricted cash at beginning of period included in assets held for sale	392		—
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period	$	492,473	$	368,758	$	398,207		$	439,812

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	393,527	$	256,421	$	240,316		$	242,561
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period included in assets held for sale	—		348
Restricted cash at end of period	133,127		149,865		126,649			152,151
Restricted cash at end of period included in assets held for sale	—		1,171
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	526,654	$	407,805	$	366,965		$	394,712

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Organization and Description of Business

Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (“Ashford Trust”), is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). While our portfolio currently consists of upscale hotels and upper upscale full-service hotels, our investment strategy is predominantly focused on investing in upper upscale full-service hotels in the ~~upscale and upper upscale segments in domestic and international markets~~U.S. that have revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) generally less than twice the U.S. national average, and in all methods including direct real estate, equity, and debt. ~~Other than Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.’s investment~~Future investments will predominantly be in ~~Ashford Inc. common stock, we~~upper upscale hotels. We own our lodging investments and conduct our business through Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership (“Ashford Trust OP”), our operating partnership. Ashford OP General Partner LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ashford Trust, serves as the sole general partner of our operating partnership. In this report, terms such as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and all entities included in its consolidated financial statements.

~~We are advised by Ashford Hospitality Advisors LLC (“Ashford LLC”), a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., through an advisory agreement. All of the~~Our hotel properties ~~in our portfolio~~ are ~~currently asset-managed by Ashford LLC.~~ ~~We do not have any employees. All~~primarily branded under the widely recognized upscale and upper upscale brands of ~~the services that might be provided by employees are provided to us by Ashford LLC.~~

Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott and Intercontinental Hotel Group. As of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020, we owned interests in the following assets:

~~120~~116 consolidated hotel properties, including ~~118~~114 directly owned and ~~two~~2 owned through a majority-owned investment in a consolidated entity, which represent ~~25,055~~24,746 total rooms (or ~~25,028~~24,719 net rooms excluding those attributable to our ~~partners)~~partner);

8790 hotel condominium units at WorldQuest Resort in Orlando, Florida (“WorldQuest”);

~~a 29.6% ownership in Ashford Inc. common stock with a carrying value of $2.6 million and a fair value of $36.2 million;~~ and

~~a 16.2%~~17.1% ownership in OpenKey with a carrying value of ~~$2.7~~$2.8 million.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be treated as a REIT, which imposes limitations related to operating hotels. As of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020, our ~~120~~116 hotel properties were leased or owned by our ~~wholly owned~~wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries that are treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries for U.S. federal income tax purposes (collectively, these subsidiaries are referred to as “Ashford TRS”). Ashford TRS then engages third-party or affiliated hotel management companies to operate the hotels under management contracts. Hotel operating results related to these properties are included in the consolidated statements of operations.

~~As of~~ ~~September 30, 2017, Remington Lodging &~~We are advised by Ashford Hospitality Advisors LLC ~~together with its affiliates~~ (“~~Remington Lodging”~~Ashford LLC”), ~~which is beneficially wholly owned~~a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., through an advisory agreement. All of the hotel properties in our portfolio are currently asset-managed by ~~Mr. Monty J. Bennett, our Chairman, and Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., our Chairman Emeritus, managed~~ 82Ashford LLC. We do not have any employees. All of the services that might be provided by employees are provided to us by Ashford LLC.

We do not operate any of our ~~120~~hotel properties directly; instead we employ hotel management companies to operate them for us under management contracts. Remington Hotels, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., manages 79 of our 116 hotel properties and ~~WorldQuest Resort.~~WorldQuest. Third-party management companies ~~managed~~manage the remaining hotel properties.

Ashford Inc. also provides other products and services to us or our hotel properties through certain entities in which Ashford Inc. has an ownership interest. These products and services include, but are not limited to project management services, debt placement services, audio visual services, real estate advisory services, insurance claims services, hypoallergenic premium rooms, investment management services and mobile key technology.

COVID-19, Management’s Plans and Liquidity

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flow in 2020. As a result, in March 2020, the Company suspended the quarterly cash dividend on its common shares for the first quarter of 2020 and likely the remainder of 2020, reduced planned capital expenditures and reduced the compensation of its board of directors, and, working closely with its hotel managers, significantly reduced its hotels’ operating expenses. The Company’s advisor adopted a remote-work policy at its corporate office in an effort to protect the health and safety of its employees and does not anticipate these policies to have any adverse impact on its ability to continue to operate its business.

Although the Company was in compliance with all its debt covenants as of March 31, 2020, subsequent to March 31, 2020 the Company did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of its mortgage loans, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable mortgage loan, such an Event of Default caused an automatic increase in the interest rate on our outstanding loan balance for the period such Event of Default remains outstanding. Following an Event of Default, the Company’s lenders can generally elect to accelerate all principal and accrued interest payments that remain outstanding under the applicable mortgage loan and foreclose on the applicable hotel properties that are security for such loans. The lenders who hold the notes that are secured by the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square and Hilton Scotts Valley hotel in Santa Cruz, California have each sent us an acceleration notice which accelerated all payments due under the applicable loan agreement. The Company is actively negotiating the terms for forbearance agreements or waivers with its lenders. Additionally, certain of the Company's hotel properties are subject to ground leases rather than a fee simple interest, with respect to all or a portion of the real property at those hotels. It is possible the Company will default on some or all of the ground leases within the next twelve months. Based on these factors, the Company has determined that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires that in making this determination, the Company cannot consider any remedies that are outside of the Company’s control and have not been fully implemented. As a result, the Company could not consider future potential fundraising activities, whether through equity or debt offerings, dispositions of hotel properties or the likelihood of obtaining forbearance agreements as we could not conclude they were probable of being effectively implemented. Any forbearance agreement will most likely lead to increased costs, increased interest rates, additional restrictive covenants and other possible lender protections. In addition to or in lieu of obtaining forbearance agreements as described above, the Company could turn over the hotels securing the mortgage loans to the respective lenders.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation—The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., its majority-owned subsidiaries, and its majority-owned ~~entities~~joint ventures in which it has a controlling interest. All significant ~~intercompany~~inter-company accounts and transactions between consolidated entities have been eliminated in these consolidated financial statements. We have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. We believe the disclosures made herein are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading. However, the financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our ~~2016~~2019 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March ~~16, 2017.~~12, 2020.

Ashford Trust OP is considered to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”), as defined by authoritative accounting guidance. A VIE must be consolidated by a reporting entity if the reporting entity is the primary beneficiary because it has (i) the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance ~~(ii) an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed,~~ and ~~(iii)~~(ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE. All major decisions related to Ashford Trust OP that most significantly impact its economic performance, including but not limited

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

to operating procedures with respect to business affairs and any acquisitions, dispositions, financings, restructurings or other transactions with sellers, purchasers, lenders, brokers, agents and other applicable representatives, are subject to the approval of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ashford Trust OP General Partner LLC, its general partner. As such, we consolidate Ashford Trust OP.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Historical seasonality patterns at some of our hotel properties cause fluctuations in our overall operating results. Consequently, operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2017~~2020.

The following acquisitions and dispositions affect reporting comparability of our consolidated financial statements:



Hotel Property	Location	Type	Date
~~5-hotel portfolio~~ ⁽¹⁾ Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square	~~Various~~New York, NY	Acquisition	January 22, 2019
Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley	Santa Cruz, CA	Acquisition	February 26, 2019
San Antonio Marriott	San Antonio, TX	Disposition	~~June 1, 2016~~August 2, 2019
~~Hampton~~Hilton Garden Inn ~~& Suites~~Wisconsin Dells	~~Gainesville,~~Wisconsin Dells, WI	Disposition	August 6, 2019
Courtyard Savannah	Savannah, GA	Disposition	August 14, 2019
SpringHill Suites Jacksonville	Jacksonville, FL	Disposition	~~September 1, 2016~~December 3, 2019
~~SpringHill Suites Gaithersburg~~Crowne Plaza Annapolis	~~Gaithersburg,~~Annapolis, MD	Disposition	~~October 1, 2016~~
~~2-hotel portfolio~~ ⁽²⁾	~~Palm Desert, CA~~	~~Disposition~~	~~October 7, 2016~~
~~Renaissance~~	~~Portsmouth, VA~~	~~Disposition~~	~~February 1, 2017~~
~~Embassy Suites~~	~~Syracuse, NY~~	~~Disposition~~	March ~~6, 2017~~
~~Crowne Plaza Ravinia~~	~~Atlanta, GA~~	~~Disposition~~	~~June 29, 2017~~9, 2020

⁽¹⁾The 5-hotel portfolio is comprised of the Courtyard Edison in Edison, New Jersey; the Residence Inn Buckhead in Atlanta, Georgia; the Courtyard Lake Buena Vista, the Fairfield Inn Lake Buena Vista and the SpringHill Suites Lake Buena Vista in Orlando, Florida.

⁽²⁾~~The 2-hotel portfolio is comprised of the Courtyard and Residence Inn in Palm Desert, California.~~

Use of Estimates—The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Restricted Cash~~Income Taxes—~~Restricted cash~~On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into law and includes ~~reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, and insurance, as well as excess cash flow deposits and reserves for furniture, fixtures, and equipment replacements of approximately 4%~~certain income tax provisions relevant to ~~6% of property revenue for certain hotels, as~~businesses. The Company is required ~~by certain management or mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions. We early adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash~~ ~~effective January 1, 2017. See discussion~~to recognize the effect on the consolidated financial statements in ~~recently adopted accounting standards below.~~

~~Impairment of Investments in Hotel Properties—Hotel properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may~~the period the law was enacted, which is the period ended March 31, 2020. For the period ended March 31, 2020, the CARES Act did not ~~be recoverable. Recoverability~~have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. At this time, the Company does not expect the impact of the ~~hotel is measured by comparison of~~CARES Act to have a material impact on the carrying amount of the hotel to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, which take into account current market conditions and our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the hotel. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the hotel is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment chargeCompany’s consolidated financial statements for the amount by which the property’s net book value exceeds its estimated fair value, or fair value, less cost to sell. In evaluating impairment of hotel properties, we make many assumptions and estimates, including projected cash flows, expected holding period, and expected useful life. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including internally developed discounted cash flow models, comparable market transactions and third-party appraisals, where considered necessary. We recorded an impairment charge of $1.8 million to investments in hotel properties for the three and nine monthsyear ended ~~September 30, 2017 related to hurricanes in Florida and Texas. We recorded an impairment charge of $5.0 million to investments in hotel properties for the three and nine months ended September~~December 31, ~~2016. See note 4.~~2020.

~~Hotel Dispositions~~—Discontinued operations are defined as the disposal of components of an entity that represents strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. We believe that individual dispositions of hotel properties do not represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and financial results as most will not fit the definition.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~Assets Held for Sale~~—We classify assets as held for sale when we have obtained a firm commitment from a buyer, and consummation of the sale is considered probable and expected within one year. The related operations of assets held for sale are reported as discontinued if the disposal is a component of an entity that represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and cash flows. Depreciation and amortization will cease as of the date assets have met the criteria to be deemed held for sale. See note 4.

~~Investments in Unconsolidated Entities~~—Investments in entities in which we have ownership interests ranging from 16.2% to 29.6%, at September 30, 2017, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting by recording the initial investment and our percentage of interest in the entities’ net income/loss. We review the investments in our unconsolidated entities for impairment in each reporting period pursuant to the applicable authoritative accounting guidance. An investment is impaired when its estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of our investment. Any impairment is recorded in equity in earnings (loss) in unconsolidated entities. No ~~such impairment was recorded for the~~ ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~.

Our investments in certain unconsolidated entities are considered to be variable interests in the underlying entities. VIEs, as defined by authoritative accounting guidance, must be consolidated by a reporting entity if the reporting entity is the primary beneficiary because it has (i) the power to direct the VIE’s activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, (ii) an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed, and (iii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE. Because we do not have the power and financial responsibility to direct the unconsolidated entities’ activities and operations, we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary of these entities on an ongoing basis and therefore such entities should not be consolidated. In evaluating VIEs, our analysis involves considerable management judgment and assumptions.

~~Revenue Recognition~~—Hotel revenues, including room, food, beverage, and ancillary revenues such as long-distance telephone service, laundry, parking and space rentals, are recognized when services have been rendered. Taxes collected from customers and submitted to taxing authorities are not recorded in revenue. Interest income is recognized when earned. We discontinue recording interest and amortizing discounts/premiums when the contractual payment of interest and/or principal is not received when contractually due.

~~Equity-Based Compensation~~—Stock/unit-based compensation for non-employees is accounted for at fair value based on the market price of the shares at period end in accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance that results in recording expense, included in “advisory services fee” and “management fees” equal to the fair value of the award in proportion to the requisite service period satisfied during the period. Performance stock units (“PSUs”) and performance-based Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Performance LTIP”) units granted to certain executive officers are accounted for at fair value at period end based on a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model that results in recording expense, included in “advisory services fee,” equal to the fair value of the award in proportion to the requisite service period satisfied during the period. Stock/unit grants to independent directors are recorded at fair value based on the market price of the shares at grant date, which amount is fully expensed as the grants of stock/units are fully vested on the date of grant.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards—In ~~March~~June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~ASU 2016-07,~~ ~~Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting~~ (“ASU 2016-07”), which simplifies the equity method of accounting by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively apply the equity method to an investment that subsequently qualifies for such accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. ASU 2016-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2017, and the adoption of this standard did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash~~ (“ASU 2016-18”), which clarifies the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statements of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-18 restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2017 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard resulted in the inclusion of restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows for all periods presented. As a result net cash provided by operating activities increased $13.1 million and net cash used in investing activities decreased $15.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Our beginning-of-period cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash increased $144.4 million and $153.7 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~Recently Issued~~ Accounting Standards~~—In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~ Updated (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model, which requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The update will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, ~~Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date~~, which defers the effective date to fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard permits the use of either the full retrospective or cumulative effect (modified retrospective) transition method. We are continuing to evaluate each of our revenue streams under the new standard and because of the short-term, day-to-day nature of hotel revenues, our pattern of revenue recognition is not expected to change significantly. Additionally, we have historically disposed of hotel properties for cash sales with no contingencies and no future involvement in the hotel operations, therefore, ASU No. 2014-09 will not impact the recognition of hotel sales. We presently expect to select the modified retrospective method. We do not expect adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We continue to evaluate the related disclosure requirements.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,~~ ~~Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~ (“ASU 2016-01”), which requires an entity to: (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in OCI the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price and; (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses of AFS debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. ASU 2016-01 provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes. It also requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Certain provisions of ASU 2016-01 are eligible for early adoption. We do not expect that ASU 2016-01 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases~~ ~~(“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”~~ASU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The accounting for leases under which we are the lessor remains largely unchanged. While we are currently in the initial stages of assessing the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements, we expect the primary impact to our consolidated financial statements upon adoption will be the recognition, on a discounted basis, of our future minimum rentals due under noncancelable leases on our consolidated balance sheets resulting in the recording of ROU assets and lease obligations.

~~In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU~~ 2016-13, Financial Instruments -Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments(" (“ASU ~~2016-13"~~2016-13”). The ASU sets forth an “expected credit loss” impairment model to replace the current “incurred loss” method of recognizing credit losses. The standard requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for most financial assets held. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-13 will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In ~~August 2016,~~November 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-15,~~ ~~Statement~~2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“ASU 2018-19”). ASU 2018-19 clarifies that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of ~~Cash Flows~~Subtopic 326-20. Instead, impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with Topic 842, Leases. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic ~~230)~~326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Leases (Topic 842): ~~Classification~~Effective Dates (“ASU 2019-10”). ASU 2019-10 updates the effective dates for ASU 2016-13, but there is no change for public companies. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (“ASU 2019-11”). ASU 2019-11, clarifies specific issues within the amendments of ~~Certain Cash Receipts~~ASU 2016-13. We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2020 and ~~Cash Payments~~the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01, Investments - aEquity Securities (Topic 321), Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815 (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task ~~Force~~Force) (“ASU ~~2016-15”~~2020-01”)~~. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in~~, which clarifies the statement of cash flows. Certain issues addressed in this guidance include - debt payments or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds frominteraction between the ~~settlement of insurance claims, distributions received from~~accounting for equity securities, equity method investments, and ~~beneficial interests~~certain derivative instruments. The ASU, among other things, clarifies that a company should consider observable transactions that require a company to either apply or discontinue the equity method of accounting under Topic 323, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures, for the purposes of applying the measurement alternative in ~~securitization transactions.~~accordance with Topic 321 immediately before applying or upon discontinuing the equity method. ASU ~~2016-15~~2020-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017,~~2020, and interim periods within those fiscal ~~years.~~years and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU ~~2016-15 will~~2020-01 may have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In ~~January 2017,~~March 2020, the FASB issued ASU ~~2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations~~2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic ~~805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business~~ 848) (“ASU ~~2017-01”~~2020-04”)~~, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted~~. ASU 2020-04 contains practical expedients for ~~as an acquisition (or disposal) of an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 is~~reference rate reform related activities that impact debt, leases, derivatives and other contracts. The guidance

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

~~effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption~~in ASU 2020-04 is ~~permitted. While we are currently evaluating~~optional and may be elected over time as reference rate reform activities occur. The Company continues to evaluate the ~~potential~~ impact of the ~~standard, we currently expect that certain future hotel acquisitions~~guidance and may be considered asset acquisitions rather than business combinations, which would affect capitalization of acquisitions costs (such costs are expensed for business combinations and capitalized for asset acquisitions).

~~In February 2017,~~apply the ~~FASB issued ASU 2017-05,~~ ~~Other Income-Gains and Losses from~~elections as applicable as changes in the ~~Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets(ASU “2017-05”), which clarifies the scope of~~ ~~Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 610-20,Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assetsand adds guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets.~~ ~~ASU 2017-05 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.~~Early adoption is permitted. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2017-05 under a retrospective or modified retrospective approach. We are evaluating the impact that ASU 2017-05 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.market occur.

3. Revenue

The following tables present our revenue disaggregated by geographical areas (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
Primary Geographical Market	Number of Hotels	Rooms		Food and Beverage		Other Hotel		Other		Total
Atlanta, GA Area	9	$	14,058	$	4,059	$	1,153	$	—	$	19,270
Boston, MA Area	3	6,788		995		1,233		—		9,016
Dallas / Ft. Worth Area	7	13,128		3,921		959		—		18,008
Houston, TX Area	3	5,106		2,291		188		—		7,585
Los Angeles, CA Metro Area	6	16,212		3,357		1,085		—		20,654
Miami, FL Metro Area	3	8,142		2,441		207		—		10,790
Minneapolis - St. Paul, MN - WI Area	4	4,570		1,259		590		—		6,419
Nashville, TN Area	1	9,538		5,100		888		—		15,526
New York / New Jersey Metro Area	7	14,335		3,403		1,100		—		18,838
Orlando, FL Area	3	6,913		427		678		—		8,018
Philadelphia, PA Area	3	3,687		688		161		—		4,536
San Diego, CA Area	2	3,344		247		238		—		3,829
San Francisco - Oakland, CA Metro Area	7	16,092		2,068		648		—		18,808
Tampa, FL Area	2	6,609		2,141		351		—		9,101
Washington D.C. - MD - VA Area	9	20,446		4,388		1,977		—		26,811
Other Areas	47	65,318		10,996		5,530		—		81,844
Orlando WorldQuest	—	1,031		25		347		—		1,403
Sold properties	1	490		144		15		—		649
Corporate	—	—		—		—		772		772
Total	117	$	215,807	$	47,950	$	17,348	$	772	$	281,877



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Primary Geographical Market	Number of Hotels	Rooms		Food and Beverage		Other Hotel		Other		Total
Atlanta, GA Area	9	$	20,276	$	5,043	$	1,195	$	—	$	26,514
Boston, MA Area	3	9,470		1,601		812		—		11,883
Dallas / Ft. Worth Area	7	15,904		4,776		885		—		21,565
Houston, TX Area	3	6,641		2,561		199		—		9,401
Los Angeles, CA Metro Area	6	20,544		4,593		1,166		—		26,303
Miami, FL Metro Area	3	8,910		2,788		225		—		11,923
Minneapolis - St. Paul, MN - WI Area	4	6,369		1,622		793		—		8,784
Nashville, TN Area	1	12,082		5,198		697		—		17,977
New York / New Jersey Metro Area	7	18,877		4,706		766		—		24,349
Orlando, FL Area	3	8,986		536		460		—		9,982
Philadelphia, PA Area	3	4,667		793		156		—		5,616
San Diego, CA Area	2	4,329		402		219		—		4,950
San Francisco - Oakland, CA Metro Area	7	21,625		2,338		567		—		24,530
Tampa, FL Area	2	8,134		2,713		269		—		11,116
Washington D.C. - MD - VA Area	9	25,755		5,450		1,811		—		33,016
Other Areas	47	80,378		14,415		5,300		—		100,093
Orlando WorldQuest	—	1,186		15		393		—		1,594
Sold properties	5	6,248		1,511		291		—		8,050
Corporate	—	—		—		—		1,072		1,072
Total	121	$	280,381	$	61,061	$	16,204	$	1,072	$	358,718

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

4. Investments in Hotel Properties, net

Investments in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Land	$	767,363		$	769,381
Buildings and improvements	4,092,971			4,129,884
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	480,612			503,156
Construction in progress	22,820			29,745
Condominium properties	11,901			12,093
Total cost	5,375,667			5,444,259
Accumulated depreciation	(1,351,491		)	(1,335,816		)
Investments in hotel properties, net	$	4,024,176		$	4,108,443

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Land $ 657,144
$ 663,013
Buildings and improvements 3,902,162
3,913,377
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 442,468
434,091
Construction in progress 36,468
32,525
Condominium properties 11,896
11,558
Total cost 5,050,138
5,054,564
Accumulated depreciation (985,583 ) (894,001 )
Investments in hotel properties, net $ 4,064,555
$ 4,160,563

4.5. Hotel ~~Dispositions,~~Disposition and Impairment Charges ~~and Insurance Recoveries and Assets Held For Sale~~

Hotel Disposition

On ~~June 1, 2016,~~ March 9, 2020, the Company sold the ~~Noble Five Hotels, a 5-hotel portfolio of select-service hotel properties~~Crowne Plaza in Annapolis, Maryland for approximately ~~$142.0~~$5.1 million in cash. The net carrying value was approximately $2.1 million. The sale resulted in a gain of ~~$22.8~~approximately $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The portfolio is comprised of the Courtyard Edison in Edison, New Jersey, the Residence Inn Buckhead in Atlanta, Georgia, the Courtyard Lake Buena Vista, the Fairfield Inn Lake Buena Vista and the SpringHill Suites Lake Buena Vista in Orlando, Florida.

~~On September 1, 2016, the Company sold the Hampton Inn Gainesville for approximately $26.5 million in cash. The sale resulted in a gain of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.~~

On October 1, 2016, the Company sold the SpringHill Suites in Gaithersburg, Maryland for approximately $13.2 million. The consideration received from the sale was a combination of cash and approximately 2.0 million Class B common units of the Company’s operating partnership. The Class B operating partnership units were redeemed at a price of $5.74 per unit, or a price of $6.05 per common share after taking into account the current conversion factor. The Company also repaid approximately $10.4 million of debt associated with the hotel property. The sale resulted in a loss of $223,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On October 7, 2016, the Company sold the Courtyard and Residence Inn in Palm Desert, California for $36.0 million. The consideration received from the sale was a combination of cash and assumption of approximately $23.8 million of mortgage debt associated with the hotel properties. The sale resulted in a gain of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.

~~On February 1, 2017,~~ ~~the Company sold the Renaissance hotel in Portsmouth, Virginia (“Renaissance Portsmouth”) for approximately $9.2 million in cash. The sale resulted in a loss of $43,000 for the nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017 and is~~March 31, 2020, which was included in “gain (loss) on sale of assets and hotel properties” in the consolidated statements of operations. ~~The Company also repaid approximately $20.2~~

Impairment Charges

During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we recorded an impairment charge of $27.6 million, which was comprised of ~~debt associated~~$13.9 million at the Columbus Hampton Inn Easton, $10.0 million at the Canonsburg Homewood Suites Pittsburgh Southpointe and $3.7 million at the Phoenix Hampton Inn Airport North as a result of reduced estimated cash flows resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and changes to the expected holding periods of these hotel properties. Each impairment charge was based on methodologies which include the development of the discounted cash flow method of the income approach with support based on the ~~hotel property. See note 6.~~

~~On March 6, 2017, the Company sold the Embassy Suites in Syracuse, New York (“Embassy Suites Syracuse”) for approximately $8.8 million in cash. The sale resulted in a loss of $40,000~~market approach, which are considered Level 3 valuation techniques. There were 0 impairment charges for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017 and is included in “gain (loss) on sale of~~March 31, 2019.

The following table presents our hotel ~~properties”~~properties measured at fair value aggregated by the level in the ~~consolidated statements of operations. The Company also repaid approximately $20.6 million of debt associated with~~fair value hierarchy within which measurements fall on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2020, and the ~~hotel property. See note 6.~~

related impairment charges recorded (in thousands):



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Impairment Charges
Columbus Hampton Inn Easton	$	—	$	—	$	13,293	$	13,293	$	13,943	⁽¹⁾
Phoenix Hampton Inn Airport North	—		—		9,030		9,030		3,692		⁽¹⁾
Canonsburg Homewood Suites Pittsburgh Southpointe	—		—		17,255		17,255		9,978		⁽¹⁾
Total	$	—	$	—	$	39,578	$	39,578	$	27,613

_________________________


⁽¹⁾	The impairment charges were based on the estimated fair value of each applicable property and were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2020.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

On June 29, 2017, the Company sold the Crowne Plaza Ravinia in Atlanta, Georgia for approximately $88.7 million in cash. The sale resulted in a gain of $14.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and is included in “gain (loss) on sale of hotel properties” in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company also repaid approximately $78.7 million of debt associated with the hotel property. See note 6.

We included the results of operations for these hotel properties through the date of disposition in net income (loss). The following table includes condensed financial information from these hotel properties in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Total hotel revenue $ 5
$ 14,293
$ 12,447
$ 67,704
Total hotel operating expenses (305 ) (9,649 ) (9,849 ) (44,581 )
Operating income (loss) (300 ) 4,644
2,598
23,123
Property taxes, insurance and other (4 ) (742 ) (617 ) (3,273 )
Depreciation and amortization —
(2,077 ) (2,588 ) (10,159 )
Impairment charge —
(5,039 ) —
(5,039 )
Gain (loss) on sale of hotel properties 15
1,448
14,024
24,428
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs —
(2,069 ) (2,361 ) (8,905 )
Write-off of loan costs and exit fees —
(972 ) (98 ) (4,913 )
Net income (loss) (289 ) (4,807 ) 10,958
15,262
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership 45
673
(1,724 ) (2,138 )
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company $ (244 ) $ (4,134 ) $ 9,234
$ 13,124

~~Impairment Charges and Insurance Recoveries~~

In August and September 2017, twenty-four of our hotel properties in Texas and Florida were impacted by the effects of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. The Company holds insurance policies that provide coverage for property damage and business interruption after meeting certain deductibles at all of its hotel properties. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized impairment charges, net of anticipated insurance recoveries of $1.8 million. Additionally, the Company recognized remediation and other costs, net of anticipated insurance recoveries of $3.7 million, included primarily in other hotel operating expenses. As of September 30, 2017, the company has recorded an insurance receivable of $1.4 million, net of deductibles of $5.5 million, included in “accounts receivable, net” on our consolidated balance sheet, related to the anticipated insurance recoveries. The Company will not record an insurance recovery receivable for business interruption losses associated with lost profits until the amount for such recoveries is known and the amount is realizable.

~~Assets Held For Sale~~

At December 31, 2016, the Renaissance Portsmouth and the Embassy Suites Syracuse were classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet based on methodologies discussed in note 2. Since the sale of the properties did not represent a strategic shift that had (or will have had) a major effect on our operations or financial results, their results of operation were not reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. Depreciation and amortization were ceased as of the date the assets were deemed held for sale. On February 1, 2017, we completed the sale of the Renaissance Portsmouth for approximately $9.2 million. On March 6, 2017, we completed the sale of the Embassy Suites Syracuse for approximately $8.8 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~The major classes of assets and liabilities related to the assets held for sale included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 were as follows:~~

December 31, 2016
Assets
Investments in hotel properties, net $ 17,232
Cash and cash equivalents 976
Restricted cash 392
Accounts receivable 305
Inventories 96
Deferred costs, net 4
Prepaid expenses 309
Other assets 274
Assets held for sale $ 19,588

Liabilities
Indebtedness, net $ 35,679
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,323
Due to related party, net 45
Liabilities related to assets held for sale $ 37,047

5. Investment in Unconsolidated ~~Entities~~Entity

~~Ashford Inc.~~

We held approximately 598,000 shares of Ashford Inc. common stock, which represented an approximate 29.6% ownership interest in Ashford Inc. as of September 30, 2017, with a carrying value of $2.6 million and a fair value of $36.2 million.

~~The following tables summarize the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2016~~ ~~and the condensed consolidated statements of operations of Ashford Inc. and our equity in earnings (loss) for the three and nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~ ~~(in thousands):~~

~~Ashford Inc.~~

~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets~~

~~(unaudited)~~

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Total assets $ 84,012
$ 129,797
Total liabilities $ 49,754
$ 38,168
Redeemable noncontrolling interests 1,936
1,480
Total stockholders’ equity of Ashford Inc. 31,862
37,377
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities 460
52,772
Total equity 32,322
90,149
Total liabilities and equity $ 84,012
$ 129,797
Our ownership interest in Ashford Inc. $ 2,582
$ 5,873

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~Ashford Inc.~~

~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Total revenue $ 19,255
$ 16,538
$ 51,907
$ 48,099
Total operating expenses (21,595 ) (16,673 ) (54,965 ) (50,938 )
Operating income (loss) (2,340 ) (135 ) (3,058 ) (2,839 )
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment in unconsolidated entity, net —
—
—
(1,460 )
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net —
(441 ) (91 ) (5,889 )
Interest expense and loan amortization costs (20 ) —
(35 ) —
Other income (expense) 77
59
220
(21 )
Income tax (expense) benefit 25
(575 ) (9,248 ) (560 )
Net income (loss) (2,258 ) (1,092 ) (12,212 ) (10,769 )
(Income) loss from consolidated entities attributable to noncontrolling interests 102
486
267
6,852
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests 300
321
995
794
Net income (loss) attributable to Ashford Inc. $ (1,856 ) $ (285 ) $ (10,950 ) $ (3,123 )
Our equity in earnings (loss) of Ashford Inc. $ (569 ) $ (85 ) $ (3,291 ) $ (959 )

~~AQUA U.S. Fund~~

The AQUA U.S. Fund was managed by Ashford Investment Management, LLC (“AIM”), an indirect subsidiary of Ashford Inc. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the AQUA U.S. Fund was consolidated by Ashford Inc. The AQUA U.S. Fund invested substantially all of its assets in the Ashford Quantitative Alternatives Master Fund, LP (the “Master Fund”), previously named the AIM Real Estate Hedged Equity Master Fund, LP, and as a consequence of our investment in the AQUA U.S. Fund, we obtained an indirect interest in the Master Fund. Our maximum exposure of loss was limited to our investment in the AQUA U.S. Fund.

During the first quarter of 2017, we liquidated our investment in the AQUA U.S. Fund subject to a 5% hold back of $2.6 million, which was received during the second quarter of 2017. Our ownership interest in the AQUA U.S. Fund was $50.9 million at December 31, 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 our equity in earnings was $52,000. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 our equity in loss was $395,000 and $3.3 million, respectively.

~~OpenKey~~

~~In 2016, the Company made investments totaling $2.3 million in~~ OpenKey, which is controlled and consolidated by Ashford Inc., is a hospitality-focused mobile key platform that provides a universal smart phone app and related hardware and software for a 13.3% ownership interest. On March 2, 2017 and September 12, 2017, we invested an additional $650,000 and $333,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has made investments totaling $3.3 million, for a 16.23% ownership interest.keyless entry into hotel guest rooms. Our investment is recorded as a component of “investment in unconsolidated ~~entities”~~entity” in our consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets and is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as we have been deemed to have significant influence over the entity under the applicable accounting guidance. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, the Company has made investments in OpenKey totaling $4.7 million.

Our investment is recorded as “investment in unconsolidated entity” in our consolidated balance sheets and is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as we have been deemed to have significant influence over the entity under the applicable accounting guidance. We review our investment in OpenKey for impairment in each reporting period pursuant to the applicable authoritative accounting guidance. An investment is impaired when its estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the investment. Any impairment is recorded in equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entity. No such impairment was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

The following table summarizes our carrying value and ownership interest ~~had a carrying value of $2.7 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,~~in OpenKey:



	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Carrying value of the investment in OpenKey (in thousands)	$	2,801		$	2,829
Ownership interest in OpenKey	17.1		%	17.0		%

The following table summarizes our equity in earnings (loss) in the unconsolidated entity was a loss of $111,000 and $341,000, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, our equity in earnings (loss) in the unconsolidated entity was a loss of $80,000 and $196,000, respectively.

OpenKey (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
Line Item	2020			2019
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entity	$	(79	)	$	(116	)

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

67. Indebtedness, net

Indebtedness consisted of the following (in thousands):

Indebtedness Collateral Maturity Interest Rate September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Mortgage loan ⁽²⁾
1 hotel June 2017 5.98% $ —
$ 15,729
Mortgage loan ⁽³⁾
17 hotels December 2017
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 5.52%
412,500
412,500
Mortgage loan ⁽⁴⁾
2 hotels January 2018 4.44% —
105,047
Mortgage loan 1 hotel January 2018 4.38% 94,722
96,169
Mortgage loan ⁽⁵⁾
8 hotels January 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.95%
376,800
376,800
Mortgage loan ⁽⁶⁾
5 hotels February 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.75%
200,000
200,000
Mortgage loan ⁽⁷⁾
1 hotel April 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.95%
33,300
33,300
Mortgage loan ^{(8) (9) (10) (11)}
22 hotels April 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.39%
971,654
1,070,560
Mortgage loan ⁽¹²⁾
1 hotel May 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 5.10%
25,100
25,100
Mortgage loan ⁽¹³⁾
1 hotel June 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 5.10%
43,750
43,750
Mortgage loan ⁽¹⁴⁾
1 hotel July 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.15%
35,200
35,200
Mortgage loan ⁽¹⁴⁾
1 hotel July 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 5.10%
40,500
40,500
Mortgage loan ⁽¹⁴⁾
8 hotels July 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.09%
144,000
144,000
Mortgage loan ⁽¹⁵⁾
1 hotel August 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.95%
12,000
12,000
Mortgage loan ⁽¹⁶⁾
4 hotels August 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.38%
52,530
52,530
Mortgage loan ^{(16) (17) (18)}
6 hotels August 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.35%
280,421
301,000
Mortgage loan ⁽³⁾
18 hotels October 2018
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.55%
450,000
450,000
Mortgage loan 1 hotel July 2019 4.00% 5,361
5,436
Mortgage loan ⁽²⁾
1 hotel May 2020
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 2.90%
16,100
—
Mortgage loan 1 hotel November 2020 6.26% 95,638
96,873
Mortgage loan ⁽⁴⁾
2 hotels June 2022
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 3.00%
164,700
—
Mortgage loan 1 hotel May 2023 5.46% 54,020
54,685
Mortgage loan 1 hotel January 2024 5.49% 7,028
7,111
Mortgage loan 1 hotel January 2024 5.49% 10,258
10,378
Mortgage loan 1 hotel May 2024 4.99% 6,559
6,641
Mortgage loan 2 hotels August 2024 4.85% 12,288
12,427
Mortgage loan 3 hotels August 2024 4.90% 24,561
24,836
Mortgage loan 3 hotels August 2024 5.20% 66,454
67,164
Mortgage loan 2 hotels February 2025 4.45% 20,304
20,575
Mortgage loan 3 hotels February 2025 4.45% 52,517
53,293
3,708,265
3,773,604
Premiums, net 1,756
3,523
Deferred loan costs, net (11,152 ) (17,889 )
$ 3,698,869
$ 3,759,238

Indebtedness related to assets held for sale ⁽¹⁰⁾
1 hotel April 2017
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.39%
—
16,080
Indebtedness related to assets held for sale ⁽¹⁸⁾
1 hotel August 2017
LIBOR ⁽¹⁾ + 4.35%
—
19,599
Indebtedness, net $ 3,698,869
$ 3,723,559

⁽¹⁾ ~~LIBOR rates were~~ ~~1.232%~~ ~~and~~ ~~0.772%~~ at ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2016, respectively.~~



Indebtedness	Collateral	Maturity	Interest Rate	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Mortgage loan⁽²⁾	19 hotels	April 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.20%	$	907,030		$	907,030
Mortgage loan⁽³⁾	1 hotel	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 5.10%	—			43,750
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	7 hotels	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.65%	180,720			180,720
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	7 hotels	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.39%	174,400			174,400
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	5 hotels	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.73%	221,040			221,040
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	5 hotels	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 4.02%	262,640			262,640
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	5 hotels	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.73%	160,000			160,000
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	5 hotels	June 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.68%	215,120			215,120
Mortgage loan⁽⁵⁾	1 hotel	July 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 4.40%	35,200			35,200
Mortgage loan⁽⁵⁾	8 hotels	July 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 4.33%	144,000			144,000
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	November 2020	6.26%	91,046			91,542
Mortgage loan⁽⁶⁾	1 hotel	November 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.55%	25,000			25,000
Mortgage loan⁽⁷⁾	17 hotels	November 2020	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.00%	419,000			419,000
Mortgage loan⁽⁸⁾	8 hotels	February 2021	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.92%	395,000			395,000
Mortgage loan⁽⁴⁾	2 hotels	March 2021	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.75%	240,000			240,000
Mortgage loan⁽⁹⁾	1 hotel	February 2022	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.90%	145,000			145,000
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	November 2022	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.00%	97,000			97,000
Mortgage loan⁽⁹⁾	1 hotel	December 2022	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.25%	16,100			16,100
Mortgage loan⁽³⁾	1 hotel	January 2023	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 3.40%	37,000			—
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	May 2023	5.46%	51,582			51,843
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	June 2023	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.45%	73,450			73,450
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	January 2024	5.49%	6,727			6,759
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	January 2024	5.49%	9,818			9,865
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	May 2024	4.99%	6,260			6,292
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	June 2024	LIBOR⁽¹⁾ + 2.00%	8,881			8,881
Mortgage loan	3 hotels	August 2024	5.20%	64,022			64,207
Mortgage loan	2 hotels	August 2024	4.85%	11,809			11,845
Mortgage loan	3 hotels	August 2024	4.90%	23,611			23,683
Mortgage loan	2 hotels	February 2025	4.45%	19,369			19,438
Mortgage loan	3 hotels	February 2025	4.45%	50,098			50,279
Mortgage loan	1 hotel	March 2025	4.66%	24,794			24,919
				4,115,717			4,124,003
Premiums, net				598			655
Deferred loan costs, net				(12,657		)	(18,140		)
Indebtedness, net				$	4,103,658		$	4,106,518

⁽²⁾On May 24, 2017, we refinanced this mortgage loan totaling $15.7 million set to mature in June 2017 with a new $16.1 million mortgage loan with a three-year initial term and two one-year extension options subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Through May 2019, the new mortgage loan is interest only and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.90%. Beginning on June 1, 2019, monthly principal payments based on a thirty-year amortization and a 6.00% interest rate are due._____________________________


⁽¹⁾	LIBOR rates were 0.993% and 1.763% at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.


⁽²⁾	This mortgage loan has 5 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.


⁽³⁾	On January 9, 2020, we refinanced this mortgage loan totaling $43.8 million with a new $37.0 million mortgage loan with a three-year initial term and 2 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The new mortgage loan is interest only and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR + 3.40%.


⁽⁴⁾	This mortgage loan has 5 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.


⁽⁵⁾	This mortgage loan has 3 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The third one-year extension period began in July 2019.


⁽⁶⁾	This mortgage loan has 3 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.


⁽⁷⁾	This mortgage loan has 5 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began in November 2019.


⁽⁸⁾	This mortgage loan has 5 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began February 2020.


⁽⁹⁾	This mortgage loan has 2 one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.

⁽³⁾~~This mortgage loan has four one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.~~

1615

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

⁽⁴⁾On ~~May 10, 2017,~~January 9, 2020, we refinanced ~~this mortgage loan totaling $104.3 million set to mature in January 2018 with a new $181.0~~our $43.8 million mortgage loan, ~~of which our initial advance was $164.7~~secured by the Le Pavillon in New Orleans, Louisiana. In connection with the refinance we reduced the loan amount by $6.8 million. The new mortgage loan totals $37.0 million. The new mortgage loan is interest only and ~~bears~~provides for an interest ~~at a~~ rate of LIBOR ~~+3.00%~~+ 3.40%. ~~Beginning on July 1, 2020, quarterly principal payments of $750,000 are due.~~

⁽⁵⁾~~This mortgage loan has three~~The stated maturity is January 2023 with 2 one-year extension options, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. The ~~first one-year extension period began in January 2017~~

⁽⁶⁾~~This~~ mortgage loan ~~has threeone-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and a LIBOR floor of 0.20%. The second one-year extension period began in February 2017.~~

⁽⁷⁾~~This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began in April 2017.~~

⁽⁸⁾~~This mortgage loan has four one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began in April 2017.~~

⁽⁹⁾~~This mortgage loan had a $20.2 million pay down of principal related to the sale of the Renaissance Portsmouth that was sold on February 1, 2017.~~

⁽¹⁰⁾~~A portion of this mortgage loan at December 31, 2016 relates to the Renaissance Portsmouth that was sold on February 1, 2017. See note 4.~~

⁽¹¹⁾~~This mortgage loan had a $78.7 million pay down of principal related to the sale of the Crowne Plaza Ravinia that was sold on June 29, 2017. See note 4.~~

⁽¹²⁾~~This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began in May 2017.~~

⁽¹³⁾~~This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began in June 2017.~~

⁽¹⁴⁾~~This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The first one-year extension period began in July 2017.~~

⁽¹⁵⁾~~This mortgage loan has two one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.~~

⁽¹⁶⁾~~This mortgage loan has three one-year extension options, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. The second one-year extension period began in August 2017.~~

⁽¹⁷⁾~~This mortgage loan had a $20.6 million pay down of principal related to the sale of the Embassy Suites Syracuse that was sold on March 6, 2017. See note 4.~~

⁽¹⁸⁾~~A portion of this mortgage loan at December 31, 2016 relates to the Embassy Suites Syracuse that was sold on March 6, 2017. See note 4.~~

~~On February 1, 2017, we repaid $20.2 million of principal on our mortgage loan partially~~is secured by the ~~Renaissance Portsmouth. This hotel property was sold on February 1, 2017.~~

~~On March 6, 2017, we repaid $20.6 million of principal on our mortgage loan partially secured by the Embassy Suites Syracuse. This hotel property was sold on March 6, 2017.~~

On May 10, 2017, we refinanced a $105.0 million mortgage loan, secured by the Renaissance Nashville in Nashville, Tennessee and the Westin in Princeton, New Jersey. The new mortgage loan totals $181.0 million, of which our initial advance was $164.7 million with future advances totaling $16.3 million as reimbursement for capital expenditures. The mortgage loan is interest only and provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 3.00%. Beginning on July 1, 2020, quarterly principal payments of $750,000 are due.~~The stated maturity is June 2022, with no extension options.~~

On May 24, 2017, we refinanced a $15.7 million mortgage loan, secured by the Hotel Indigo (“Indigo Atlanta”) in Atlanta, Georgia. The new mortgage loan totals $16.1 million. The mortgage loan is interest only and provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 2.90% for the first two years with a 30-year amortization schedule based on a 6% interest rate starting in the third year. The stated maturity is May 2020, with two one-year extension options.

~~On June 29, 2017, we repaid $78.7 million of principal on our mortgage loan partially secured by the Crowne Plaza Ravinia. This hotel property was sold on June 29, 2017.~~Le Pavillon.

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized net premium amortization ~~of $185,000 and $1.8 million, respectively, and during~~as presented in the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized premium amortization of $527,000 and $1.6 million, respectively.~~ table below (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
Line Item	2020		2019
Interest expense and amortization of premium and loan costs	$	56	$	65

The amortization of the net premium is computed using a method that approximates the effective interest method, which is included in ~~interest~~“interest expense and amortization of premiums and loan ~~costs~~costs” in the consolidated statements of operations.

We are required to maintain certain financial ratios under various debt and related agreements. If we violate covenants in any debt or related agreement, we could be required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. The assets of certain of our subsidiaries are pledged under non-recourse indebtedness and are not available to satisfy the debts and other obligations of Ashford Trust or Ashford Trust OP, our operating partnership, and the liabilities of such subsidiaries do not constitute the obligations of Ashford Trust or Ashford Trust OP. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we were in compliance in all material respects with all covenants or other requirements set forth in our debt and related agreements as amended. Subsequent to March 31, 2020 the Company did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of its mortgage loans, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents. See note 1.

7.~~Income (Loss) Per Share~~8. Notes Receivable, net and Other

~~Basic income (loss) per common share is calculated using~~Notes receivable, net are summarized in the ~~two-class method by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss)~~

table below (dollars in thousands):



	Interest Rate		March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Construction Financing Note ^{(1) (5)}
Face amount	7.0	%	$	4,000		$	4,000
Discount ⁽²⁾			(339		)	(402		)
			3,661			3,598
Certificate of Occupancy Note ^{(3) (5)}
Face amount	7.0	%	$	5,250		$	5,250
Discount ⁽⁴⁾			(1,067		)	(1,139		)
			4,183			4,111
Note receivable, net			$	7,844		$	7,709


⁽¹⁾	The outstanding principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable on or before the earlier of (i) the buyer closing on third party institutional financing for the construction of improvements on the property, (ii) three years after the development commencement date, or (iii) July 9, 2024.


⁽²⁾	The discount represents the imputed interest during the interest free period. Interest begins accruing on July 9, 2021.


⁽³⁾	The outstanding principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable on or before July 9, 2025.


⁽⁴⁾	The discount represents the imputed interest during the interest free period. Interest begins accruing on July 9, 2023.


⁽⁵⁾	The notes receivable are secured by the 1.65-acre land parcel adjacent to the Hilton St. Petersburg Bayfront.

NaN cash interest income was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we recognized discount amortization of $135,000, which is included in “other income (expense)” in the consolidated statement of operations.

On January 1, 2020, we adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. Upon adoption we evaluated the notes and other receivables under the criteria in ASC Topic 326. Upon adoption we determined that the expected credit loss associated with the notes and other receivables was immaterial. As of March 31, 2020, there was no allowance related to the notes receivable.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

~~per common share is calculated using~~Other consideration received from the ~~two-class method, or treasury stock method if more dilutive, and reflects~~sale of the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares, whereby such exercise or conversion would result in lower income per share.

~~The following table reconciles the amounts used in calculating basic and diluted income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Income (loss) allocated to common stockholders:
Income (loss) attributable to the Company $ (21,808 ) $ (20,145 ) $ (37,037 ) $ 619
Less: Dividends on preferred stock (11,440 ) (8,875 ) (33,352 ) (25,856 )
Less: Extinguishment of issuance costs upon redemption of preferred stock (4,507 ) (6,124 ) (4,507 ) (6,124 )
Less: Dividends on common stock (11,439 ) (11,345 ) (34,316 ) (34,018 )
Less: Dividends on unvested performance stock units (98 ) (40 ) (294 ) (120 )
Less: Dividends on unvested restricted shares (251 ) (197 ) (709 ) (548 )
Undistributed income (loss) (49,543 ) (46,726 ) (110,215 ) (66,047 )
Add back: Dividends on common stock 11,439
11,345
34,316
34,018
Distributed and undistributed income (loss) - basic and diluted $ (38,104 ) $ (35,381 ) $ (75,899 ) $ (32,029 )

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted 95,332
94,531
95,169
94,384

Basic income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders per share $ (0.40 ) $ (0.37 ) $ (0.80 ) $ (0.34 )

Diluted income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders per share $ (0.40 ) $ (0.37 ) $ (0.80 ) $ (0.34 )

~~Due~~1.65-acre parking lot adjacent to the ~~anti-dilutive effect,~~Hilton St. Petersburg Bayfront is summarized in the ~~computation of diluted income (loss) per share does not reflect adjustments for the following items (in~~table below (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Income (loss) allocated to common stockholders is not adjusted for:
Income (loss) allocated to unvested restricted shares $ 251
$ 197
$ 709
$ 548
Income (loss) allocated to unvested performance stock units 98
40
294
120
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest in operating partnership units (6,940 ) (5,009 ) (13,202 ) (2,745 )
Total $ (6,591 ) $ (4,772 ) $ (12,199 ) $ (2,077 )

Weighted average diluted shares are not adjusted for:
Effect of unvested restricted shares 368
479
284
334
Effect of unvested performance stock units 250
41
97
24
Effect of assumed conversion of operating partnership units 17,551
19,252
17,367
19,046
Effect of incentive fee shares 277
—
287
—
Total 18,446
19,772
18,035
19,404



	Imputed Interest Rate		March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
Future ownership rights of parking parcel	7.0	%	$	4,100			$	4,100
Imputed interest			145				72
			4,245			⁽¹⁾	4,172			⁽¹⁾

Free use of parking easement prior to development commencement	7.0	%	$	235			$	235
Accumulated amortization			(235		)		(118		)
			—			⁽¹⁾	117			⁽¹⁾

Reimbursement of parking fees while parking parcel is in development ⁽²⁾	7.0	%	$	462			$	462
Accumulated amortization			—				—
			462			⁽¹⁾	462			⁽¹⁾
Total			$	4,751			$	4,751


⁽¹⁾	Included in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.


⁽²⁾	Amortization will commence when the parking parcel begins development.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we recognized imputed interest of $73,000 and amortization of $117,000 related to the free use of parking easement, which are included in “other income (expense)” in the consolidated statement of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

8.9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging

Interest Rate Derivatives—We are exposed to risks arising from our business operations, economic conditions and financial markets. To manage these risks, we primarily use interest rate derivatives to hedge our debt and our cash flows. The interest rate derivatives currently include interest rate caps and interest rate floors. These derivatives are subject to master netting settlement arrangements. To mitigate the nonperformance risk, we routinely use a third party’s analysis of the creditworthiness of the counterparties, which supports our belief that the counterparties’ nonperformance risk is limited. All derivatives are recorded at fair value.

~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we~~The following table presents a summary of our interest rate derivatives entered into interest rate caps with notional amounts totaling $2.1 billion and strike rates ranging from 1.50% to 5.84%. These interest rate caps had effective dates from February 2017 to August 2017, maturity dates from February 2018 to June 2019, and a total costover each applicable period:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020				2019
Interest rate caps:
Notional amount (in thousands)	$	432,000		⁽¹⁾	$	385,000		⁽¹⁾
Strike rate low end of range	3.00		%		3.50		%
Strike rate high end of range	4.00		%		4.00		%
Effective date range	January 2020				January 2019 - March 2019
Termination date range	February 2021 - February 2022				March 2021 - February 2022
Total cost (in thousands)	$	63			$	295

Interest rate floors:
Notional amount (in thousands)	$	—		⁽¹⁾	$	6,000,000		⁽¹⁾
Strike rate low end of range					1.63		%
Strike rate high end of range					1.63		%
Effective date range					January 2019
Termination date range					March 2020
Total cost (in thousands)	$	—			$	225

_______________


⁽¹⁾	These instruments were not designated as cash flow hedges.

Table of $633,000. In September 2017, we entered into an interest rate floor with a notional amount of $4.0 billion and a strike rate of 1%. This interest rate floor has a termination date of March 2019 and a total cost of $163,000. These instruments were not designated as cash flow hedges.Contents

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we entered into interest rate caps with notional amounts totaling $628.5 million and strike rates ranging from 2.00% to 4.50%. These interest rate caps had effective dates from February 2016 to August 2016, termination dates from February 2017 to December 2017, and a total cost of $104,000. These instruments were not designated as cash flow hedges.ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~As of September 30, 2017, we~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

We held interest rate ~~caps with notional amounts totaling $3.4 billion and strike rates ranging from 1.50% to 5.84%. These~~ instruments ~~had maturity dates ranging from December 2017 to June 2019. These instruments cap~~as summarized in the interest rates on our mortgage loans with principal balances of $3.3 billion and maturity dates from December 2017 to June 2022. As of September 30, 2017, we held interest rate floors with notional amounts totaling $10.0 billion and strike rates ranging from (0.25)% to 1%. These instruments have termination dates ranging from March 2019 to July 2020.table below:



	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
Interest rate caps:
Notional amount (in thousands)	$	3,836,740		⁽¹⁾	$	3,799,740		⁽¹⁾
Strike rate low end of range	1.50		%		1.50		%
Strike rate high end of range	5.22		%		5.22		%
Termination date range	April 2020 - February 2022				February 2020 - February 2022
Aggregate principle balance on corresponding mortgage loans (in thousands)	$	3,659,581			$	3,666,331

Interest rate floors:⁽²⁾
Notional amount (in thousands)	$	6,025,000		⁽¹⁾	$	12,025,000		⁽¹⁾
Strike rate low end of range	(0.25		)%		(0.25		)%
Strike rate high end of range	1.25		%		1.63		%
Termination date range	April 2020 - November 2021				March 2020 - November 2021

_______________


⁽¹⁾	These instruments were not designated as cash flow hedges.


⁽²⁾	Cash collateral is posted by us as well as our counterparties. We offset the fair value of the derivative and the obligation/right to return/reclaim cash collateral.

Credit Default Swap Derivatives—We use credit default swaps, tied to the CMBX index, to hedge financial and capital market risk. A credit default swap is a derivative contract that functions like an insurance policy against the credit risk of an entity or obligation. The seller of protection assumes the credit risk of the reference obligation from the buyer (us) of protection in exchange for annual premium payments. If a default or a loss, as defined in the credit default swap agreements, occurs on the underlying bonds, then the buyer of protection is protected against those losses. The only liability for us, the buyer, is the annual premium and any change in value of the underlying CMBX index (if the trade is terminated prior to maturity). For all CMBX trades completed to date, we were the buyer of protection. Credit default swaps are subject to master-netting settlement arrangements and credit support annexes. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we held credit default swaps with notional amounts totaling $212.5 million. These credit default swaps had effective dates from February 2015 to August 2017 and expected maturity dates from October 2023 to October 2026. Assuming the underlying bonds pay off at par over their remaining average life, our total exposure for these trades was approximately ~~$8.4~~$6.8 million as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~ March 31, 2020.Cash collateral is posted by us as well as our counterparties. We offset the fair value of the derivative and the obligation/right to return/reclaim cash collateral. The change in market value of credit default swaps is settled net through posting cash collateral or reclaiming cash collateral between us and our counterparties when the change in market value is over $250,000.

~~Options on Futures Contracts~~—During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we purchased options on Eurodollar futures for a total cost of $250,000 and maturity date of June 2017. There were no purchases during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

9.10. Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Hierarchy—For disclosure purposes, financial instruments, whether measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis or not measured at fair value, are classified in a hierarchy consisting of three levels based on the observability of valuation inputs in the market place as discussed below:

Level 1: Fair value measurements that are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that we have the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market price data generally is obtained from exchange or dealer markets.

Level 2: Fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Level 3: Fair value measurements based on valuation techniques that use significant inputs that are unobservable. The circumstances for using these measurements include those in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

Fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts/payments and the discounted expected variable cash payments/receipts. Fair values of interest rate caps, floors, flooridors and corridors are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fell below the strike rates of the floors or rise above the strike rates of the caps. Variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts and payments on the swaps, caps, and floors are based on an expectation

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves (LIBOR forward curves) and volatilities (Level 2 inputs). We also incorporate credit valuation adjustments (Level 3 inputs) to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk.

Fair values of credit default swaps are obtained from a third party who publishes various information including the index composition and price data (Level 2 inputs). The fair value of credit default swaps does not contain credit-risk-related adjustments as the change in fair value is settled net through posting cash collateral or reclaiming cash collateral between us and our counterparty.

Fair values of interest rate floors are calculated using a third-party discounted cash flow model based on future cash flows that are expected to be received over the remaining life of the floor. These expected future cash flows are probability-weighted projections based on the contract terms, accounting for both the magnitude and likelihood of potential payments, which are both computed using the appropriate LIBOR forward curve and market implied volatilities as of the valuation date (Level 2 inputs).

Fair value of options on futures contracts is determined based on the last reported settlement price as of the measurement date (Level 1 inputs). These exchange-traded options are centrally cleared, and a clearinghouse stands in between all trades to ensure that the obligations involved in the trades are satisfied.

Fair values of marketable securities and liabilities associated with marketable securities, including public equity securities, equity put and call options, and other investments, are based on their quoted market closing prices (Level 1 inputs).

Fair values of hotel properties are based on methodologies which include the development of the discounted cash flow method of the income approach with support based on the market approach (Level 3 inputs). See note 5.

When a majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. However, when valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties, which we consider significant (10% or more) to the overall valuation of our derivatives, the derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Transfers of inputs between levels are determined at the end of each reporting period. In determining the fair values of our derivatives at ~~September 30, 2017~~,March 31, 2020, the LIBOR interest rate forward curve (Level 2 inputs) assumed ~~an uptrend~~a downtrend from ~~1.232%~~0.993% to ~~1.826%~~0.211% for the remaining term of our derivatives. Credit spreads (Level 3 inputs) used in determining the fair values ~~of hedge and non-hedge designated~~ derivatives assumed an uptrend in nonperformance risk for us and all of our counterparties through the maturity dates.

2019

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis aggregated by the level within which measurements fall in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

Quoted Market Prices (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Counterparty and Cash Collateral Netting⁽¹⁾
Total

September 30, 2017:
Assets
Derivative assets:
Interest rate derivatives - floors $ —
$ 288
$ —
$ 118
$ 406
⁽²⁾
Interest rate derivatives - caps —
44
—
—
44
⁽²⁾
Credit default swaps —
329
—
942
$ 1,271
⁽²⁾
—
661
—
1,060
1,721

Non-derivative assets:
Equity securities 11,960
—
—
—
11,960
⁽³⁾
Total $ 11,960
$ 661
$ —
$ 1,060
$ 13,681

Liabilities
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps —
(146 ) —
—
(146 )
⁽⁴⁾
Net $ 11,960
$ 515
$ —
$ 1,060
$ 13,535

December 31, 2016:
Assets
Derivative assets:
Interest rate derivatives - floors $ —
$ 2,358
$ —
$ —
$ 2,358
⁽²⁾
Interest rate derivatives - caps —
24
—
—
24
⁽²⁾
Credit default swaps —
2,867
—
(1,751 ) 1,116
⁽²⁾
Options on futures contracts 116
—
—
—
116
⁽²⁾
116
5,249
—
(1,751 ) 3,614

Non-derivative assets:
Equity securities 53,185
—
—
—
53,185
⁽³⁾
Total $ 53,301
$ 5,249
$ —
$ (1,751 ) $ 56,799



	Quoted Market Prices (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Counter-party and Cash Collateral Netting⁽¹⁾			Total


March 31, 2020:
Assets
Derivative assets:
Interest rate derivatives - floors	$	—	$	419		$	—	$	—		$	419		⁽²⁾
Interest rate derivatives - caps	—		58			—		—			58			⁽²⁾
Credit default swaps	—		851			—		301			1,152			⁽²⁾
	—		1,328			—		301			1,629
Non-derivative assets:
Equity securities	437		—			—		—			437			⁽³⁾
Total	$	437	$	1,328		$	—	$	301		$	2,066
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps	—		350			—		(700		)	(350		)	⁽⁴⁾
Net	$	437	$	1,678		$	—	$	(399	)	$	1,716

December 31, 2019:
Assets
Derivative assets:
Interest rate derivatives - floors	$	—	$	42		$	—	$	257		$	299		⁽²⁾
Interest rate derivatives - caps	—		47			—		—			47			⁽²⁾
Credit default swaps	—		(1,579		)	—		2,924			1,345			⁽²⁾
	—		(1,490		)	—		3,181			1,691
Non-derivative assets:
Equity securities	14,591		—			—		—			14,591			⁽³⁾
Total	$	14,591	$	(1,490	)	$	—	$	3,181		$	16,282
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps	—		(1,092		)	—		1,050			(42		)	⁽⁴⁾
Net	$	14,591	$	(2,582	)	$	—	$	4,231		$	16,240


⁽¹⁾	Represents net cash collateral posted between us and our counterparties.


⁽²⁾	Reported net as “derivative assets, net” in our consolidated balance sheets.


⁽³⁾	Reported as “marketable securities” in our consolidated balance sheets.


⁽⁴⁾	Reported net as “derivative liabilities, net” in our consolidated balance sheets.

⁽¹⁾ ~~Represents net cash collateral posted between us and our counterparties.~~

⁽²⁾ ~~Reported net as “derivative assets, net” in the consolidated balance sheets.~~

⁽³⁾ ~~Reported as “marketable securities” in the consolidated balance sheets.~~

⁽⁴⁾ ~~Reported net as “derivative liabilities, net” in the consolidated balance sheets.~~

2120

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Effect of ~~Fair-Value-Measured~~Fair Value Measured Assets and Liabilities on Consolidated Statements of Operations

The following tables summarize the effect of ~~fair-value-measured~~fair value measured assets and liabilities on the consolidated statements of operations ~~for the~~ ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~(in thousands):


	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income								Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017				2016				2020				2019
Assets
Derivative assets:
Interest rate derivatives - floors	$	(291	)		$	(8,202	)		$	377			$	(196	)
Interest rate derivatives - caps	(96		)		(40		)		(52		)		(642		)
Credit default swaps	(1,380		)	⁽⁴⁾	(1,854		)	⁽⁴⁾	2,430			⁽⁴⁾	(1,533		)	⁽⁴⁾
Options on futures contracts	—				(155		)
	(1,767		)		(10,251		)		2,755				(2,371		)
Non-derivative assets:
Equity	12				—				627				804
Total	(1,755		)		(10,251		)		3,382				(1,567		)
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps	(887		)	⁽⁴⁾	—			⁽⁴⁾	1,442			⁽⁴⁾	(786		)	⁽⁴⁾
Net	$	(2,642	)		$	(10,251	)		$	4,824			$	(2,353	)

Total combined
Interest rate derivatives - floors	$	(291	)		$	(8,202	)		$	602			$	(33	)
Interest rate derivatives - caps	(96		)		(40		)		(52		)		(642		)
Credit default swaps	(1,092		)		(1,307		)		3,872				(2,319		)
Options on futures contracts	—				1
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	(1,479		)	⁽¹⁾	(9,548		)	⁽¹⁾	4,422			⁽¹⁾	(2,994		)	⁽¹⁾
Realized gain (loss) on credit default swaps	(1,175		)	^{(2) (4)}	(547		)	^{(2) (4)}
Realized gain (loss) on options on futures contracts	—			⁽²⁾	(156		)	⁽²⁾
Realized gain (loss) on interest rate floors									(225		)	⁽²⁾	(163		)	⁽²⁾
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities	(936		)	⁽³⁾	—			⁽³⁾	(1,477		)	⁽³⁾	808			⁽³⁾
Realized gain (loss) on marketable securities	948			⁽²⁾	—			⁽²⁾	2,104			⁽²⁾	(4		)	⁽²⁾
Net	$	(2,642	)		$	(10,251	)		$	4,824			$	(2,353	)


⁽¹⁾	Reported as “unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives” in our consolidated statements of operations.


⁽²⁾	Included in “other income (expense)” in our consolidated statements of operations.


⁽³⁾	Reported as “unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities” in our consolidated statements of operations.


⁽⁴⁾	Excludes costs of $268 and $266 for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, included in “other income (expense)” associated with credit default swaps.

⁽¹⁾~~Reported as “unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives” in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

⁽²⁾~~Included in “other income (expense)” in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

⁽³⁾~~Included in “unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities” in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

⁽⁴⁾~~Excludes costs of $257 and $237 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, included in “other income (expense)” associated with credit default swaps.~~

2221

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Assets
Derivative assets:
Interest rate derivatives - floors $ (2,233 ) $ 4,780

Interest rate derivatives - caps (613 ) (460 )
Credit default swaps (2,100 )
⁽⁴⁾
(3,227 )
⁽⁴⁾
Options on futures contracts (116 ) (270 )
(5,062 ) 823

Non-derivative assets:
Equity (3,991 ) —

Total (9,053 ) 823

Liabilities
Derivative liabilities:
Credit default swaps (1,450 )
⁽⁴⁾
—
⁽⁴⁾
Net $ (10,503 ) $ 823

Total combined
Interest rate derivatives - floors $ (2,233 ) $ 4,780

Interest rate derivatives - caps (613 ) (460 )
Credit default swaps 615
42

Options on futures contracts 427
(114 )
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (1,804 )
⁽¹⁾
4,248
⁽¹⁾
Realized gain (loss) on credit default swaps (4,165 )
^{(2) (4)}
(3,269 )
Realized gain (loss) on options on futures contracts (543 )
⁽²⁾
(156 )
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities (4,813 )
⁽³⁾
—

Realized gain (loss) on marketable securities 822
⁽²⁾
—

Net $ (10,503 ) $ 823

⁽¹⁾~~Reported as “unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives” in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

⁽²⁾~~Included in “other income (expense)” in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

⁽³⁾~~Included in “unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities” in the consolidated statements of operations.~~

⁽⁴⁾~~Excludes costs of $769 and $615 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, included in “other income (expense)” associated with credit default swaps.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~10.~~11. Summary of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Determining estimated fair values of our financial instruments such as notes receivable and indebtedness requires considerable judgment to interpret market data. Market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies used may have a material effect on estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts at which these instruments could be purchased, sold, or settled. Carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, for periods indicated, were as follows (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value:
Marketable securities	$	437	$	437	$	14,591	$	14,591
Derivative assets, net	1,629		1,629		1,691		1,691
Derivative liabilities, net	350		350		42		42

Financial assets not measured at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	240,316	$	240,316	$	262,636	$	262,636
Restricted cash	126,649		126,649		135,571		135,571
Accounts receivable, net	29,129		29,129		39,638		39,638
Notes receivable, net	7,844		$7,452 to $8,236		7,709		$7,323 to $8,095
Due from related parties, net	4,399		4,399		3,019		3,019
Due from third-party hotel managers	19,183		19,183		17,368		17,368

Financial liabilities not measured at fair value:
Indebtedness	$	4,116,315	$3,771,655 to $4,168,669		$	4,124,658	$3,881,453 to $4,290,027
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	135,993		135,993		134,341		134,341
Dividends and distributions payable	11,740		11,740		20,849		20,849
Due to Ashford Inc., net	5,229		5,229		6,570		6,570
Due to third-party hotel managers	3,021		3,021		2,509		2,509

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016

Carrying
Value

Estimated
Fair Value

Carrying
Value

Estimated
Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value:
Marketable securities $ 11,960
$ 11,960
$ 53,185
$ 53,185
Derivative assets, net 1,721
1,721
3,614
3,614
Derivative liabilities, net 146
146
—
—

Financial assets not measured at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents ⁽¹⁾
$ 393,527
$ 393,527
$ 348,067
$ 348,067
Restricted cash ⁽¹⁾
133,127
133,127
144,406
144,406
Accounts receivable, net ⁽¹⁾
61,677
61,677
44,934
44,934
Due from third-party hotel managers 19,230
19,230
13,348
13,348

Financial liabilities not measured at fair value:
Indebtedness⁽¹⁾
$ 3,708,265
$3,541,070 to $3,913,817
$ 3,773,604
$3,600,691 to $3,979,713
Accounts payable and accrued expenses ⁽¹⁾
153,772
153,772
128,309
128,309
Dividends and distributions payable 25,520
25,520
24,765
24,765
Due to Ashford Inc., net 13,689
13,689
15,716
15,716
Due to Ashford Prime OP, net —
—
488
488
Due to related party, net ⁽¹⁾
326
326
1,046
1,046
Due to third-party hotel managers 2,627
2,627
2,714
2,714

⁽¹⁾~~Includes balances associated with assets held for sale and liabilities associated with assets held for sale as of December 31, 2016.~~

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. These financial assets bear interest at market rates and have original maturities of less than 90 ~~days and most bear interest at market rates.~~days. The carrying value approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. This is considered a Level 1 valuation technique.

Accounts receivable, net, accounts payable and accrued expenses, dividends and distributions payable, due to/from ~~Ashford Prime OP, due to~~ related ~~party,~~parties, net, due to Ashford Inc., net and due to/from third-party hotel managers. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. This is considered a Level 1 valuation technique.

Notes receivable, net. The carrying amount of notes receivable, net approximates its fair value. We estimate the fair value of the notes receivable, net to be approximately 95.0% and 105.0% of the carrying value of $7.8 million at March 31, 2020 and approximately 95.0% to 105.0% of the carrying value of $7.7 million as of December 31, 2019.

Marketable securities. Marketable securities consist of U.S. treasury bills, publicly traded equity securities, and put and call options on certain publicly traded equity securities. The fair value of these investments is based on quoted market closing prices at the balance sheet date. See note 10 for a complete description of the methodology and assumptions utilized in determining the fair values.

Derivative assets, net and derivative liabilities, net. Fair value of interest rate ~~derivatives~~caps is determined using the net present value of expected cash flows of each derivative based on the market-based interest rate curve and adjusted for credit spreads of us and our counterparties. Fair values of credit default swap derivatives are obtained from a third party who publishes the CMBX index composition and price data. Fair values of interest rate floors are calculated using a third-party discounted cash flow model based on future cash flows that are expected to be received over the remaining life of the floor. Fair values of options on futures contracts are valued at their last reported settlement price as of the measurement date. See notes ~~2, 8~~9 and 910 for a complete description of the methodology and assumptions utilized in determining fair values.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Indebtedness. Fair value of indebtedness is determined using future cash flows discounted at current replacement rates for these instruments. Cash flows are determined using a forward interest rate yield curve. Current replacement rates are determined by using the U.S. Treasury yield curve or the index to which these financial instruments are tied and adjusted for credit spreads. Credit spreads take into consideration general market conditions, maturity, and collateral. We estimated the fair value of total indebtedness to be approximately 91.6% to 101.3% of the carrying value of $4.1 billion at March 31, 2020 and approximately 94.1% to 104.0% of the carrying value of $4.1 billion at December 31, 2019. These fair value estimates are considered a Level 2 valuation technique.

12.Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per common share is calculated using the two-class method by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per common share is calculated using the two-class method, or treasury stock method if more dilutive, and reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares, whereby such exercise or conversion would result in lower income per share.

The following table reconciles the amounts used in calculating basic and diluted income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Income (loss) allocated to common stockholders - basic and diluted:
Income (loss) attributable to the Company	$	(84,201	)	$	(38,017	)
Less: Dividends on preferred stock	(10,644		)	(10,644		)
Less: Dividends on common stock	—			(11,979		)
Less: Dividends on unvested performance stock units	378			(190		)
Less: Dividends on unvested restricted shares	—			(281		)
Undistributed income (loss) allocated to common stockholders	(94,467		)	(61,111		)
Add back: Dividends on common stock	—			11,979
Distributed and undistributed income (loss) allocated to common stockholders - basic and diluted	$	(94,467	)	$	(49,132	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted	100,470			99,407

Basic income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders per share	$	(0.94	)	$	(0.49	)

Diluted income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders per share	$	(0.94	)	$	(0.49	)

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

~~indebtedness~~Due to ~~be approximately~~ ~~95.5%~~ to ~~105.5%~~their anti-dilutive effect, the computation of diluted income (loss) per share does not reflect adjustments for the ~~carrying value of~~ ~~$3.7 billion~~ at ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and approximately~~ ~~95.3%~~ to ~~105.4%~~ ~~of the carrying value of~~ ~~$3.8 billion~~ at ~~December 31, 2016. This is considered a Level 2 valuation technique.~~following items (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Income (loss) allocated to common stockholders is not adjusted for:
Income (loss) allocated to unvested restricted shares	$	—		$	281
Income (loss) allocated to unvested performance stock units	—			190
Income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	(17,671		)	(8,579		)
Total	$	(17,671	)	$	(8,108	)

Weighted average diluted shares are not adjusted for:
Effect of unvested restricted shares	238			235
Effect of unvested performance stock units	—			278
Effect of assumed conversion of operating partnership units	19,389			18,345
Effect of advisory services incentive fee shares	—			22
Total	19,627			18,880

~~11.~~13. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the operating partnership represents the limited partners’ proportionate share of equity in earnings/losses of the operating partnership, which is an allocation of net income/loss attributable to the common ~~unitholders~~unit holders based on the weighted average ownership percentage of these limited partners’ common units of limited partnership interest in the operating partnership ~~(“common~~(the “common units”) and the units issued under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP units”) that are ~~vested throughout the period. Beginning one year after issuance, each~~vested. Each common unit may be redeemed for either cash or, at our sole discretion, up to ~~one~~1 share of our REIT common stock, which is ~~either~~either: (i) issued pursuant to an effective registration statement; (ii) included in an effective registration statement providing for the resale of such common stock; or (iii) issued subject to a registration rights agreement. Ashford Trust continues to hold 598,000 shares of Ashford Inc. common stock for the benefit of its common stockholders, and all of our remaining lodging investments are owned by Ashford Trust OP. Each common unit and LTIP unit was worth approximately 94% and 96%, respectively, of one share of our common stock at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 as a result of the specific distribution characteristics to unitholders in the Ashford Inc. spin-off.

LTIP units, which are issued to certain executives and employees of Ashford LLC as compensation, have vesting periods ranging from three years to five years. Additionally, certain independent members of the board of directors have elected to receive LTIP units as part of their compensation, which are fully vested upon grant. Upon reaching economic parity with common units, each vested LTIP unit can be converted by the holder into ~~one~~1 common unit which can then be redeemed for cash or, at our election, settled in our common stock. An LTIP unit will achieve parity with the common units upon the sale or deemed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the operating partnership at a time when our stock is trading at a level in excess of the price it was trading on the date of the LTIP issuance. More specifically, LTIP units will achieve full economic parity with common units in connection with (i) the actual sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the operating partnership or (ii) the hypothetical sale of such assets, which results from a capital account revaluation, as defined in the partnership agreement, for the operating partnership. In March 2020, 275,000 LTIP units with a fair value of approximately $372,000 and a vesting period of three years were granted.

The compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company ~~approved~~may authorize the issuance of Performance LTIP units to certain executive officers ~~which have a three year cliff vesting.~~and directors from time to time. The award agreements provide for the grant of a ~~maximum~~target number of Performance LTIP units that will be settled in ~~LTIPs or~~ common units of ~~the~~ Ashford Trust OP, if, when and ~~when~~to the extent the applicable vesting criteria have been achieved following the end of the performance and service period. The ~~actual~~ number of Performance LTIP units actually earned may ~~be adjusted~~range from 0% to ~~100%~~200% of target based on achievement of a specified absolute and relative total stockholder ~~return and specified absolute total stockholder return,~~returns based on the ~~formula~~formulas determined by the Company’s ~~Compensation Committee~~compensation committee on the grant date. As of March 31, 2020, there were approximately 1.3 million Performance LTIP units, representing 200% of the target number granted, outstanding. The performance criteria for the Performance LTIP units are based on market conditions under the relevant literature, and the Performance LTIP units were granted to non-employees. ~~Compensation expense of $964,000 and $1.3 million was recorded for~~During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017, respectively, and expense~~March 31, 2020, approximately 1.1 million performance-based LTIP units were canceled due to the market condition criteria not being met. As a result there was a claw back of ~~$290,000 and $458,000 for~~ the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The~~previously declared dividends in the amount of $1.4 million.

In March 2020, 500,000 Performance LTIP units ~~unamortized~~with a fair value of ~~$5.4 million at September 30, 2017 will be expensed over~~$200,000 and a vesting period of ~~2.5 years.~~three years were granted.

As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we have issued a total of ~~11.9~~11.6 million LTIP and Performance LTIP units, ~~all~~net of ~~which,~~Performance LTIP cancellations. All LTIP and Performance LTIP units other than approximately ~~81,000, 31,000, and 662,000~~1.5 million units ~~issued in May 2017, April 2017 and March 2015, respectively,~~(500,000 of which are Performance LTIP units) have reached full economic parity with, and are convertible into, common units. Expense of $980,000 and $2.4 million was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and expense of $563,000 and $1.7 million was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, which was associated with LTIP units issued to Ashford LLC’s employees and Ashford Trust’s directors and is included in “advisory services fee” and “corporate, general and administrative,” respectively, in our consolidated statements of operations. As the LTIP units are issued to non-employees, the compensation expense was determined based on the share price as of the end of the period. The fair value of the unrecognized cost of LTIP units, which was $5.2 million at September 30, 2017, will be expensed over a period of 2.5 years.upon vesting.

~~During the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~, approximately 21,000 common units with an aggregate fair value of approximately $161,000 were redeemed by the holder and, at our election, we issued shares of our common stock to satisfy the redemption. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, approximately 5,000 common units with an aggregate fair value of approximately $24,000 were redeemed by the holder and, at our election, we issued shares of our common stock to satisfy the redemption price.

~~Redeemable noncontrolling interests, including vested LTIP units, in our operating partnership as of~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2016, were~~ ~~$117.4 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$132.8 million, respectively, which represent ownership of our operating partnership of~~ ~~15.73%~~ ~~and~~ ~~14.48%, respectively. The carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests as of~~ ~~September 30,~~

2524

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

~~2017~~The following table presents the common units redeemed and ~~December 31, 2016, included adjustments of~~ ~~$146.1 million~~the fair value upon redemption (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020
	2020		2019
Common units converted to stock	1,955		—
Fair value of common units converted	$	959	$	—

The following table presents the redeemable noncontrolling interest in Ashford Trust and ~~$144.3 million, respectively,~~the corresponding approximate ownership percentage:



	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Redeemable noncontrolling interests (in thousands)	$	35,229		$	69,870
Cumulative adjustments to redeemable noncontrolling interests ⁽¹⁾(in thousands)	130,900			155,536
Ownership percentage of operating partnership	15.71		%	15.92		%


⁽¹⁾	Reflects the excess of the redemption value over the accumulated historical costs.

We allocated net income (loss) to ~~reflect~~ the ~~excess of the redemption value over the accumulated historical costs. Redeemable~~redeemable noncontrolling interests ~~were allocated net loss of $6.9 million~~ and net loss of $13.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and net loss of $5.0 million and $2.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. We declared aggregate cash distributions to holders of common units and holders of LTIP units, ~~of $2.6 million and $7.7 million for~~as presented in the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $2.9 million and $8.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~table below (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Allocated net (income) loss to the redeemable noncontrolling interests	$	17,671		$	8,579
Distributions declared to holders of common units, LTIP unit and Performance LTIP units	(1,401		)	2,623

~~12.~~14. Equity and Equity-Based Compensation

Common Stock Dividends—For ~~each~~the first quarter of 2020, the ~~2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~ ~~quarters,~~board of directors did not declare a quarterly common stock dividend. For the first quarter of 2019, the board of directors declared a quarterly ~~dividends~~dividend of ~~$0.12~~$0.12 per outstanding share of common ~~stock with an annualized target of~~ ~~$0.48~~ ~~per share for~~ ~~2017~~.stock.

Restricted Stock Units—~~Stock-based~~We incur stock-based compensation expense of $1.9 million and $3.9 million was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and expense of $1.1 million and $3.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, in connection with ~~equity awards granted~~restricted stock units awarded to certain employees of Ashford LLC and its affiliates. We also issue common stock to certain ~~employees~~ of ~~Remington Lodging and Ashford Trust’s~~our independent directors, and is included in “advisory services fee,” “management fees” and “corporate, general and administrative,” respectively, in our consolidated statements of operations. At September 30, 2017, the unamortized cost of the unvested shares ofwhich vests immediately upon issuance. In March 2020, 1.3 million restricted stock ~~was $10.3~~units with a fair value of approximately $1.8 million ~~which will be amortized over~~and a vesting period of ~~2.5~~three years ~~subject to future mark to market adjustments, and these shares are scheduled to vest between February 2018 and April 2020.~~were granted.

Performance Stock Units—The compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company ~~approved PSUs~~may authorize the issuance of performance stock units (“PSUs”), which have a cliff vesting period of three years, to certain executive officers ~~which have a three year cliff vesting.~~and directors from time to time. The award agreements provide for the grant of a target number of PSUs that will be settled in shares of common stock of the Company, if, when and ~~when~~to the extent the applicable vesting criteria have been achieved following the end of the performance and service period. The ~~target~~ number of PSUs actually earned may ~~be adjusted~~range from 0% to 200% of target based on achievement of a specified absolute and relative total stockholder ~~return and specified absolute total stockholder return,~~returns based on the ~~formula~~formulas determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee on the grant date. The performance criteria for the PSUs are based on market conditions under the relevant literature, and the PSUs were granted to non-employees. ~~Compensation expense of $806,000 and $1.1 million was recorded for~~During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017, respectively. Compensation expense of $246,000 and $389,000~~March 31, 2020, 346,000 PSUs were canceled due to the market condition criteria not being met. As a result there was ~~recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The fair value of unrecognized cost of PSUs, which was $4.5 million at September 30, 2017, will be expensed over~~ a ~~period of approximately 2.5 years.~~

~~Preferred Stock Issuance & Redemption—On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 3.4 million shares of 7.50% Series H cumulative preferred stock. The Series H cumulative preferred stock ranks senior to all classes or series~~claw back of the Company’s common stock and future junior securities, on a parity with each series of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock (the 8.55% Series A cumulative preferred stock (all shares redeemed on September 18, 2017), the 8.45% Series D cumulative preferred stock (1.6 million shares redeemed on September 18, 2017), the 7.375% Series F cumulative preferred stock and the 7.375% Series G cumulative preferred stock) and with any future parity securities and junior to future senior securities and to all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness, with respect to the payment ofpreviously declared dividends and the distribution of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s affairs. On September 8, 2017, we issued 400,000 additional shares of 7.50% Series H preferred stock pursuant to the over-allotment option. Series H cumulative preferred stock has no maturity date, and we are not required to redeem the shares at any time. Series H cumulative preferred stock is redeemable at our option for cash (on or after August 25, 2022), in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price of $25 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, at the redemption date. Series H cumulative preferred stock may be converted into shares of our common stock, at the option of the holder, in certain limited circumstances such as a change of control. Each share of Series H cumulative preferred stock is convertible into a maximum 8.25083 shares of our common stock. The actual number is based on a formula as defined in the Series H cumulative preferred stock agreement (unless the Company exercises its right to redeem the Series H cumulative preferred shares for cash, for a limited period upon a change in control). The necessary conditions to convert the Series H preferred stock to common stock have not been met as of period end. Therefore, Series H cumulative preferred stock will not impact our earnings per share.

~~Dividends on the Series H cumulative preferred stock accrue~~ in the amount of ~~$1.8750 per share each year, which is equivalent to 7.50%~~$378,000. In March 2020, 700,000 PSUs with a fair value of ~~the $25.00 liquidation preference per share~~$560,000 and a vesting period of Series H cumulative preferred stock. Dividends on the Series H cumulative preferred stock are payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of January, April, July and October of each year (or, if not on a business day, on the next succeeding business day). The first dividend on the Series H cumulative preferred stock sold in this offering was paid on October 16, 2017 in the amount of $0.1875 per share.three years were granted.

2625

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

On September 18, 2017, the Company redeemed its 8.55% Series A cumulative preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.4631 per share, for a total redemption price of $25.4631 per share.

On September 18, 2017, the Company redeemed approximately 1.6 million shares of its 8.45% Series D cumulative preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.4577 per share, for a total redemption price of $25.4577 per share.

On October 4, 2017, the Company redeemed 379,036 shares of 8.45% Series D cumulative preferred shares at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.5516 per share, for a total redemption price of $25.5516 per share.

Preferred Dividends—~~During the three months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017, the~~The board of directors declared quarterly dividends as presented below:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
8.45% Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock	$	0.5281	$	0.5281
7.375% Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock	0.4609		0.4609
7.375% Series G Cumulative Preferred Stock	0.4609		0.4609
7.50% Series H Cumulative Preferred Stock	0.4688		0.4688
7.50% Series I Cumulative Preferred Stock	0.4688		0.4688

Stock Repurchases—On December 5, 2017, the board of ~~$0.5281~~directors reapproved a stock repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which the board of directors granted a repurchase authorization to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share ~~for our~~ ~~8.45%~~ ~~Series D cumulative~~and preferred stock ~~$0.4609 per share for~~having an aggregate value of up to $200 million. The board of directors’ authorization replaced any previous repurchase authorizations. NaN shares of our ~~7.375% Series F cumulative~~common stock or preferred stock $0.4609 per share for our 7.375% Series G cumulative preferred stock and $0.1875 per share for our 7.50% Series H cumulative preferred stock. The Series H cumulative preferred stock dividend is pro-rated forwere repurchased under the ~~number of days it was outstanding~~Repurchase Program during ~~the quarter. During~~ the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2020 and 2019.

At-the-Market Equity Offering Program—On December 11, 2017, the Company established an “at-the-market” equity offering program pursuant to which it may, from time to time, sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100 million. NaN shares of its common stock were issued under this program during the three months ended March 31, 2020 or 2019.

15. Related Party Transactions

Remington Lodging (prior to Ashford Inc. acquisitions)

Between January 1, 2019 and November 5, 2019, we paid Remington Lodging monthly hotel management fees equal to the greater of $14,000 (increased annually based on consumer price index adjustments) or 3% of gross revenues as well as annual incentive management fees, if certain operational criteria were met and other general and administrative expense reimbursements primarily related to accounting services.

Ashford Inc.

Advisory Agreement

Ashford LLC, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., acts as our advisor. Our chairman, Mr. Monty J. Bennett, also serves as chairman of the board of directors ~~declared quarterly dividends~~and chief executive officer of ~~$0.5344~~Ashford Inc.

Under our advisory agreement, we pay advisory fees to Ashford LLC. We are required to pay Ashford LLC a monthly base fee that is a percentage of our total market capitalization on a declining sliding scale plus the Net Asset Fee Adjustment, as defined in the advisory agreement, subject to a minimum monthly base fee, as payment for managing our day-to-day operations in accordance with our investment guidelines. Total market capitalization includes the aggregate principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness (including our proportionate share of debt of any entity that is not consolidated but excluding our joint venture partners’ proportionate share of consolidated debt). The range of base fees on the scale is between 0.70% and 0.50% per ~~share~~annum for total market capitalization that ranges from less than $6.0 billion to greater than $10.0 billion. At March 31, 2020, the monthly base fee was 0.70% based on our current market capitalization. We are also required to pay Ashford LLC an incentive fee that is measured annually (or stub period if the advisory agreement is terminated at other than year-end). Each year that our annual total stockholder return exceeds the average annual total stockholder return for our ~~8.55%~~ ~~Series A preferred stock,~~ ~~$0.5281~~ ~~per share~~peer group we pay Ashford LLC an incentive fee over the following three years, subject to the FCCR Condition, as defined in the advisory agreement, which relates to the ratio of adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges. We also reimburse Ashford LLC for ~~our~~ ~~8.45%~~ ~~Series D cumulative preferred~~certain reimbursable overhead and internal audit, risk management advisory and asset management services, as specified in the advisory agreement. We also record equity-based compensation expense for equity grants of common stock and ~~$0.3995 per share for~~LTIP units awarded to our ~~7.375% Series F cumulative preferred stock. The Series F cumulative preferred stock dividend was pro-rated for~~officers and employees of Ashford LLC in connection with providing advisory services equal to the ~~number~~fair value of ~~days it was outstanding~~the award in proportion to the requisite service period satisfied during the ~~quarter.~~period.

~~Noncontrolling Interests~~

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

The following table summarizes the advisory services fees incurred (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Advisory services fee
Base advisory fee	$	8,917	$	8,989
Reimbursable expenses ⁽¹⁾	1,831		2,390
Equity-based compensation ⁽²⁾	4,551		4,289
Incentive fee	—		636
Total advisory services fee	$	15,299	$	16,304

________


⁽¹⁾	Reimbursable expenses include overhead, internal audit, risk management advisory and asset management services.


⁽²⁾	Equity-based compensation is associated with equity grants of Ashford Trust’s common stock, LTIP units and Performance LTIP units awarded to officers and employees of Ashford LLC.

Lismore Advisory Fee

On March 20, 2020, Lismore Capital LLC (“Lismore”), a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., entered into an agreement with the Company to seek modifications, forbearances or refinancings of the Company’s loans (the “Ashford Trust Agreement”). Pursuant to the Ashford Trust Agreement, Lismore shall, during the agreement term (which commenced on March 20, 2020 and shall end on the date that is twelve months following the commencement date, or upon it being terminated by Ashford Trust on not less than thirty days written notice) negotiate the refinancing, modification or forbearance of the existing mortgage debt on Ashford Trust’s hotels. For the purposes of the Ashford Trust Agreement, financing shall include, without limitation, senior or subordinate loan financing, provided in ~~Consolidated Entities—Our noncontrolling entity partner had~~any single transaction or a combination of transactions, including, mortgage loan financing, mezzanine loan financing, or subordinate loan financing encumbering the applicable hotel or unsecured loan financing.

In connection with the services provided by Lismore, Lismore shall be paid an ~~ownership interest~~advisory fee of ~~15%~~up to 50 basis points (0.50%) of the aggregate amount of the modifications, forbearances or refinancings of the Company’s mortgage and mezzanine debt (the “Financing”), calculated and payable as follows: (i) 0.125% of the aggregate amount of potential Financings upon execution of the Ashford Trust Agreement; (ii) 0.125% payable in six equal installments beginning April 20, 2020 and ending on September 20, 2020; provided, however, in the event Ashford Trust does not complete, for any reason, Financings during the term of the Ashford Trust Agreement equal to or greater than $4,114,740,601, then Ashford Trust shall offset, against any fees owed by Ashford Trust or its affiliates pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, a portion of the fee paid by Ashford Trust to Lismore pursuant to this section equal to the product of (x) the amount of Financings completed during the term of the Ashford Trust Agreement minus $4,114,740,601 multiplied by (y) 0.125%; and (iii) 25 basis points (0.25%) payable upon the acceptance by the applicable lender of any Financing. As of March 31, 2020, the Company accrued an initial deposit of $5.0 million, included in “other assets” that was subsequently paid in April 2020.

Ashford Securities

On September 25, 2019, Ashford Inc. announced the formation of Ashford Securities to raise retail capital in order to grow its existing and future platforms. In conjunction with the formation of Ashford Securities, Ashford Trust has entered into a contribution agreement with Ashford Inc. pursuant to which Ashford Trust has agreed to contribute, with Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (“Braemar”), up to $15 million to fund the operations of Ashford Securities. As of March 31, 2020, Ashford Trust has funded approximately $2.5 million. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, $898,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, of the pre-funded amounts were included in “other assets” on our consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

Costs for all operating expenses of Ashford Securities that are contributed by Ashford Trust and Braemar will be expensed as incurred. These costs will be allocated initially to Ashford Trust and Braemar based on an allocation percentage of 75% to Ashford Trust and 25% to Braemar. Upon reaching the earlier of $400 million in aggregate non-listed preferred equity offerings raised or June 10, 2023, there will be a true up (the “True-up Date”) between Ashford Trust and Braemar whereby the actual capital contributions contributed by each company will be based on the actual amount of capital raised by Ashford Trust and Braemar, respectively. After the True-up Date, the capital contributions will be allocated between Ashford Trust and Braemar quarterly based on the actual capital raised through Ashford Securities. Funding advances will be expensed as the expenses are incurred by Ashford Securities. The table below summarizes the amount Ashford Trust has expensed related to reimbursed operating expenses of Ashford Securities (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
Line Item	2020		2019
Corporate, general and administrative	$	698	$	—

In the fourth quarter of 2019 the company expensed $896,000 of reimbursed operating expenses of Ashford Securities.

Enhanced Return Funding Program

The Enhanced Return Funding Program Agreement (the “ERFP Agreement”) generally provides that Ashford LLC will make investments to facilitate the acquisition of properties by Ashford Trust OP that are recommended by Ashford LLC, in an aggregate amount of up to $50 million (subject to increase to up to $100 million by mutual agreement). The investments will equal 10% of the property acquisition price and will be made, either at the time of the property acquisition or at any time generally in the following three years, in exchange for hotel FF&E for use at the acquired property or any other property owned by Ashford Trust OP.

The initial term of the ERFP Agreement is two years (the “Initial Term”), unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of the ERFP Agreement. At the end of the Initial Term, the ERFP Agreement shall automatically renew for successive one year periods (each such period a “Renewal Term”) unless either Ashford Inc. or Ashford Trust provides written notice to the other at least sixty days in advance of the expiration of the Initial Term or Renewal Term, as applicable, that such notifying party intends not to renew the ERFP Agreement.

As a result of the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square acquisition in 2019, under the ERFP Agreement, we are entitled to receive $19.5 million from Ashford LLC in the form of future purchases of hotel FF&E. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company sold $8.1 million of hotel FF&E from certain Ashford Trust hotel properties to Ashford LLC. On March 13, 2020, an extension agreement was entered into whereby the required FF&E acquisition date by Ashford LLC of the remaining $11.4 million was extended to December 31, 2022.

Project Management Agreement

In connection with Ashford Inc.’s August 8, 2018 acquisition of Remington Lodging’s project management business, we entered into a project management agreement with Ashford Inc.’s indirect subsidiary, Premier Project Management LLC (“Premier”), pursuant to which Premier provides project management services to our hotels, including construction management, interior design, architectural services, and the purchasing, freight management, and supervision of installation of FF&E and related services. Pursuant to the project management agreement, we pay Premier: (a) project management fees of up to 4% of project costs; and (b) market service fees at current market rates with respect to construction management, interior design, FF&E purchasing, FF&E expediting/freight management, FF&E warehousing and FF&E installation and supervision. On March 20, 2020, we amended the project management agreement to provide that Premier's fees shall be paid by the Company to Premier upon the completion of any work provided by third party vendors to the Company.

Hotel Management Agreement

On November 6, 2019, Ashford Inc. completed the acquisition of Remington Lodging’s hotel management business. As a result of the acquisition, hotel management services are provided by Remington Hotels, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., under the respective hotel management agreement with each customer, including Ashford Trust and Braemar.

At March 31, 2020, Remington Hotels managed 79 of our 116 hotel properties and the WorldQuest condominium properties.

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

We pay monthly hotel management fees equal to the greater of approximately $14,000 (increased annually based on consumer price index adjustments) or 3% of gross revenues as well as annual incentive management fees, if certain operational criteria were met and other general and administrative expense reimbursements primarily related to accounting services.

Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement dated March 13, 2020 (the “Hotel Management Letter Agreement”), in order to allow Remington Hotels to better manage its corporate working capital and to ensure the continued efficient operation of our hotels, we agreed to pay the base fee and to reimburse all expenses on a ~~total carrying value~~weekly basis for the preceding week, rather than on a monthly basis. The Hotel Management Letter Agreement went into effect on March 13, 2020 and will continue until terminated by us.

We also have a mutual exclusivity agreement with Remington Hotels, pursuant to which: (i) we have agreed to engage Remington Hotels to provide management services with respect to any hotel we acquire or invest in, to the extent we have the right and/or control the right to direct the management of ~~$760,000~~such hotel; and ~~$756,000 at~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2016, respectively. Our ownership interest is reported in equity~~(ii) Remington Hotels has agreed to grant us a right of first refusal to purchase any opportunity to develop or construct a hotel that it identifies that meets our initial investment guidelines. We are not, however, obligated to engage Remington Hotels if our independent directors either: (i) unanimously vote to hire a different manager or developer; or (ii) by a majority vote elect not to engage such related party because either special circumstances exist such that it would be in the ~~consolidated balance sheets. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities were allocated income~~best interest of ~~$22,000 and $4,000 for~~our Company not to engage such related party, or, based on the ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017, respectively, and income of $16,000 and loss of $16,000 for~~related party’s prior performance, it is believed that another manager could perform the ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~management or other duties materially better.

~~13.~~16. Commitments and Contingencies

Restricted Cash—Under certain management and debt agreements for our hotel properties existing at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, escrow payments are required for insurance, real estate taxes, and debt service. In addition, for certain properties based on the terms of the underlying debt and management agreements, we escrow 4% to 6% of gross revenues for capital improvements.

Franchise Fees—Under franchise agreements for our hotel properties existing at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we pay franchisor royalty fees between 1%3% and 6% of gross rooms revenue and, in some cases, 1% to 3% of food and beverage revenues. Additionally, we pay fees for marketing, reservations, and other related activities aggregating between 1% and 4% of gross rooms revenue and, in some cases, food and beverage revenues. These franchise agreements expire on varying dates between ~~2018~~2021 and 2047. When a franchise term expires, the franchisor has no obligation to renew the franchise. A franchise termination could have a material adverse effect on the operations or the underlying value of the affected hotel due to loss of associated name recognition, marketing support, and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor. A franchise termination could also have a material adverse effect on cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, if we breach the franchise agreement and the franchisor terminates a franchise prior to its expiration date, we may be liable for up to three times the average annual fees incurred for that property.

~~We incurred~~The table below summarizes the franchise fees ~~of $17.8 million and $52.6 million for the~~ ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $18.2 million and $54.4 million for the~~ ~~three and nine~~ ~~months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Franchise fees are included in “other” hotel expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.~~incurred (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
Line Item	2020		2019
Other hotel expenses	$	14,059	$	17,748

Management Fees—Under hotel management agreements for our hotel properties existing at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we pay a) monthly ~~property~~hotel management fees equal to the greater of approximately ~~$13,000~~$14,000 (increased annually based on consumer price index adjustments) or 3% of gross revenues, or in some cases 2%1% to 7% of gross revenues, as well as annual incentive management fees, if applicable, b) project management fees of up to 4% of project costs, c) market service fees including purchasing, design and construction management not to exceed 16.5% of project management budget cumulatively, including project management fees, and d) other general fees at current market rates as approved by our independent directors, if required.applicable. These hotel management agreements expire from 2020 through 2038, with renewal options. If we terminate a hotel management agreement prior to its expiration, we may be liable for estimated management fees through the remaining term and liquidated damages or, in certain circumstances, we may substitute a new management agreement.

Income Taxes—We and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the federal jurisdiction and various states. Tax years ~~2013~~2015 through ~~2016~~2019 remain subject to potential examination by certain federal and state taxing authorities.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Potential Pension Liabilities—Upon our 2006 acquisition of a hotel property, certain employees of such hotel were unionized and covered by a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan. At that time, no0 unfunded pension liabilities existed. Subsequent to our acquisition, a majority of employees, who are employees of the hotel manager, Remington Lodging, petitioned the employer to withdraw recognition of the union. As a result of the decertification petition, Remington Lodging withdrew recognition of the union. At the time of the withdrawal, the National Retirement Fund, the union’s pension fund, indicated unfunded pension liabilities

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

existed. The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) filed a complaint against Remington Lodging seeking, among other things, a ruling that Remington Lodging’s withdrawal of recognition was unlawful. ~~Pending the final determination of the NLRB complaint, including appeals, the~~The pension fund entered into a settlement agreement with Remington Lodging on November 1, 2011, providing that ~~(a)~~ Remington Lodging will continue to make monthly pension fund payments pursuant to the collective bargaining ~~agreement, and (b) if the withdrawal~~agreement. As of ~~recognition is ultimately deemed lawful,~~March 31, 2020, Remington Lodging ~~will~~continues to comply with the settlement agreement by making the appropriate monthly pension fund payments. If Remington Lodging does not comply with the settlement agreement, we have anagreed to indemnify Remington Lodging for the payment of the unfunded pension liability, if any, as set forth in the settlement agreement equal to $1.7 million minus the monthly pension payments made by Remington Lodging since the settlement agreement. To illustrate, if Remington Lodging - as of the date a final determination occurs - has made monthly pension payments equaling $100,000, Remington Lodging’s remaining withdrawal liability ~~shall~~would be the unfunded pension liability of $1.7 million minus $100,000 (or $1.6 million). This remaining unfunded pension liability ~~shall~~would be paid to the pension fund in annual installments of $84,000 (but may be made monthly or quarterly, at Remington Lodging’s election), which shall continue for the remainder of ~~the twenty-(20)-year~~twenty years, which is capped, ~~period,~~ unless Remington Lodging elects to pay the unfunded pension liability amount earlier. ~~We agreed to indemnify Remington Lodging for the payment of the unfunded pension liability, if any, as set forth in the settlement agreement.~~

Litigation—Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, et al. v. Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.This litigation involves a landlord tenant dispute from 2008 in which the landlord, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of the Company, claimed that the tenant had violated various lease provisions of the lease agreement and was therefore in default. The tenant counterclaimed and asserted multiple claims including that it had been wrongfully evicted. The litigation was instituted by the plaintiff in November 2008 in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida and proceeded to a jury trial on June 30, 2014. The jury entered its verdict awarding the tenant total claims of $10.8 million and ruling against the landlord on its claim of breach of contract. In 2016, the Court of Appeals reduced the original $10.8 million judgment to $8.8 million and added pre-judgment interest on the wrongful eviction judgment. The case was further appealed to the Florida Supreme Court. On May 23, 2017, the trial court issued an order compelling the company that issued the supersedeas bond, RLI Insurance Company (“RLI”), to pay approximately $10.0 million. On June 1, 2017, RLI paid Nantucket this amount and sought reimbursement from the ~~Company.~~Company, and on June 7, 2017, the Company paid $2.5 million of the judgment. On June 27, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the ~~Company's~~Company’s petition for review. As a result, all of the appeals were exhausted and the judgment was final with the determination and reimbursement of ~~attorney's~~attorney’s fees being the only remaining dispute. On June 29, 2017, the balance of the judgment of $3.9 million was paid to Nantucket by the Company.

On July 26, 2018, we paid $544,000 as part of a settlement on certain legal fees. The ~~Company estimates its total loss including post judgment interest and reimbursement~~negotiations relating to the potential payment of the ~~plaintiff’s~~remaining attorney’s fees are still ongoing. As of March 31, 2020, we have accrued approximately $504,000 in legal fees, ~~to be approximately $17.3 million as~~which represents the Company’s estimate of ~~September 30, 2017, resulting in additional expense of $26,000 and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.~~

On June 29, 2017, RLI filed suit in Federal District Court in Dallas seeking to recover the amounts previously paid to Nantucket. On July 19, 2017, the Company paid approximately $10.0 million to RLI mooting RLI's claim subject only to the alleged claim for attorney fees. With the agreement for the Company to pay the negotiated settlement of RLI's attorney fees in the amount of ~~$100,000,~~potential remaining legal fees that could be owed.

On December 4, 2015, Pedro Membrives filed a ~~Stipulation~~class action lawsuit against HHC TRS FP Portfolio LLC, Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC, Remington Holdings LLC, Mark A. Sharkey, Archie Bennett, Jr., Monty J. Bennett, Christopher Peckham, and any other related entities in the Supreme Court of New York, Nassau County, Commercial Division. On August 30, 2016, the complaint was amended to add Michele Spero as a Plaintiff and Remington Long Island Employers, LLC as a defendant. The lawsuit is captioned Pedro Membrives and Michele Spero, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. HHC TRS FP Portfolio LLC, Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC, Remington Holdings LLC, Remington Long Island Employers, LLC, et al., Index No. 607828/2015 (Sup. Ct. Nassau Cty.). The plaintiffs allege that the owner and management company of the Hyatt Regency Long Island hotel violated New York law by improperly retaining service charges rather than distributing them to employees. In 2017, the class was certified. On July 24, 2018, the trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for ~~Dismissal was~~summary judgment on liability. The defendants appealed the summary judgment to the New York State Appellate Division, Second Department (the “Second Department”), and the appeal is still pending. By Order dated May 7, 2020, the Second Department referred the matter for mandatory mediation and the parties are working to schedule a mediation session per the Order. Notwithstanding the pending appeal on the summary judgment issue, the trial court continued the litigation with respect to the plaintiffs’ alleged damages. The plaintiffs filed an application for damages on ~~November 2, 2017.~~August 28, 2019. The defendants filed their opposition to the plaintiffs’ application for damages on October 11, 2019. The plaintiffs filed their reply on October 25, 2019. The defendants intend to vigorously defend against the plaintiffs’ claims and the Company does not believe that an unfavorable outcome is probable. If, however, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on liability is upheld and the Company is unsuccessful in any further appeals, the Company estimates that damages could range between approximately $5.8 million and $11.9 million plus attorneys’ fees. As of March 31, 2020, 0 amounts have been accrued.

We are engaged in other various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully adjudicated. The likelihood of loss from these legal proceedings is based on the definitions within contingency accounting ~~literature, ranges from remote to reasonably possible and to probable.~~literature. Based on estimates of the range of potential losses associated with these matters, management does not believe the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, or results of ~~operations.~~operations or cash flow. However, the final results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and if we fail to prevail in one or

Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

more of these legal matters, and the associated realized losses exceed our current estimates of the range of potential losses, our consolidated financial position or results of operations could be materially adversely affected in future periods.

~~14.~~17. Segment Reporting

We operate in ~~one~~1 business segment within the hotel lodging industry: direct hotel investments. Direct hotel investments ~~refer~~refers to owning hotel properties through either acquisition or new development. We report operating results of direct hotel investments on an aggregate basis as substantially all of our hotel investments have similar economic ~~characteristics and exhibit similar long-term financial performance.~~characteristics. As of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, all of our hotel properties were domestically located.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~15. Related Party Transactions~~

Ashford LLC, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., acts as our advisor, and as a result, we pay advisory fees to Ashford LLC. We are required to pay Ashford LLC a quarterly base fee that is a percentage of our total market capitalization on a declining sliding scale plus the Key Money Asset Management Fee (defined in our advisory agreement as the aggregate gross asset value of all key money assets multiplied by 0.70%), subject to a minimum quarterly base fee, as payment for managing our day-to-day operations in accordance with our investment guidelines. Total market capitalization includes the aggregate principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness (including our proportionate share of debt of any entity that is not consolidated but excluding our joint venture partners’ proportionate share of consolidated debt). The range of base fees on the scale are between 0.70% and 0.50% per annum for total market capitalization that ranges from less than $6.0 billion to greater than $10.0 billion. At September 30, 2017, the quarterly base fee was 0.70% based on our current market capitalization. We are also required to pay Ashford LLC an incentive fee that is earned annually by Ashford LLC in each year that our annual total stockholder return exceeds the average annual total stockholder return for our peer group, subject to the FCCR Condition, as defined in the advisory agreement. We also reimburse Ashford LLC for certain reimbursable overhead and internal audit, insurance claims advisory and asset management services, as specified in the advisory agreement. We also record equity-based compensation expense for equity grants of common stock and LTIP units awarded to our officers and employees of Ashford LLC in connection with providing advisory services equal to the fair value of the award in proportion to the requisite service period satisfied during the period.

~~The following table summarizes the advisory services fees incurred (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Advisory services fee
Base advisory fee $ 8,579
$ 8,576
$ 25,934
$ 25,842
Reimbursable expenses ⁽¹⁾
1,641
1,485
5,800
4,550
Equity-based compensation ⁽²⁾
4,392
1,887
7,748
4,535
Total advisory services fee $ 14,612
$ 11,948
$ 39,482
$ 34,927

~~________~~


⁽¹⁾	~~Reimbursable expenses include overhead, internal audit, insurance claims advisory and asset management services.~~


⁽²⁾	~~Equity-based compensation is associated with equity grants of Ashford Trust’s common stock, PSUs, LTIP units and Performance LTIP units awarded to officers and employees of Ashford LLC.~~

In 2016, $4.0 million of key money consideration was invested in furniture, fixtures and equipment by Ashford Inc. to be used by Ashford Trust, which represented all of the key money consideration for the Le Pavillon Hotel. The hotel advisory services and the lease are considered a multiple element arrangement, in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. As such, a portion of the base advisory fee is allocated to lease expense equal to the estimated fair value of the lease payments that would have been made. As a result, $156,000 and $476,000 of advisory expense was allocated to lease expense and was included in “other” hotel expense in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. No advisory expense was allocated to lease expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

On January 19, 2017, AHT SMA, LP, a Delaware limited partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ashford Trust entered into an Investment Management Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ashford Investment Management, LLC (“AIM”), a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., to manage all or a portion of Ashford Trust’s excess cash (the “Account”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company retained and appointed AIM as the investment manager for us. The Agreement will govern the relationship between Ashford Trust and AIM, as well as grant AIM certain rights, powers and duties to act on behalf of the Company. AIM will not be compensated by us for its services under the Agreement. We bear all costs and expenses of the establishment and ongoing maintenance of the Account as well as all costs and expenses of AIM. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, investment management reimbursable expenses were $522,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, which are included in “corporate, general and administrative” expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had payables of $13.7 million and $15.7 million, respectively, included in due to Ashford Inc., net, associated with the advisory services fee discussed above. In addition, at March 31, 2017, we held a receivable from the AQUA U.S. Fund of $2.6 million, associated with the hold back from the AQUA U.S. Fund, of which the funds were received during the second quarter of 2017.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Certain employees of Remington Lodging, who perform work on behalf of Ashford Trust, were granted approximately 173,000 shares and 131,000 shares of restricted stock under the Ashford Trust Stock Plan in 2016 and 2017, respectively. These share grants were accounted for under the applicable accounting guidance related to share-based payments granted to non-employees and are recorded as a component of “management fees” in our consolidated statements of operations. Expense of $222,000 and $439,000 was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and expense of $230,000 and $372,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The unamortized fair value of these grants was $1.3 million as of September 30, 2017, which will be amortized over a period of 2.5 years.

~~16.~~18. Subsequent Events

~~On October 4, 2017,~~Subsequent to March 31, 2020, certain subsidiaries of the Company ~~redeemed 379,036 shares~~applied for and received loans from Key Bank, N.A. under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) which was established under the CARES Act. All funds borrowed under the PPP were returned on or before May 7, 2020.

As of ~~8.45% Series D cumulative preferred shares~~May 26, 2020, the Company has temporarily suspended operations at ~~a redemption price~~21 of ~~$25.00 per share, plus accrued~~its 116 hotels and ~~unpaid dividends through the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.5516 per share, for a total redemption price of $25.5516 per share.~~dramatically reduced staffing and expenses at its hotels that remain operational.

On October 30, 2017, we refinanced our $94.7 million mortgage loan, with an outstanding balance of $94.5 million, secured by the Hilton Boston Back Bay in Boston, Massachusetts. The new mortgage loan totals $97.0 million, provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 2.00%, a five-year term with no extension options and is secured by the Hilton Boston Back Bay.

On October 31, 2017, we refinanced our $412.5 million mortgage loan, secured by seventeen hotels. The new mortgage loan totals $427.0 million, is interest only, provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 3.00% and has a two-year initial term with five one-year extension options. The new mortgage loan is secured by the following seventeen hotels: the Courtyard Alpharetta, Courtyard Bloomington, Courtyard Crystal City, Courtyard Foothill Ranch, Embassy Suites Austin, Embassy Suites Dallas, Embassy Suites Houston, Embassy Suites Las Vegas, Embassy Suites Palm Beach, Hampton Inn Evansville, Hilton Garden Inn Jacksonville, Hilton Nassau Bay, Hilton St. Petersburg, Residence Inn Evansville, Residence Inn Falls Church, Residence Inn San Diego and Sheraton Indianapolis.

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the ~~“Company” or “we” or~~“Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) cautions investors that any forward-looking statements presented herein, or which management may express orally or in writing from time to time, are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions at that time.

Throughout this Form 10-Q, we make forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “approximately,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” or other similar words or expressions. Additionally, statements regarding the following subjects are forward-looking by their nature:

the impact of the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) and numerous governmental travel restrictions and other orders on our business;

our business and investment ~~strategy, including our ability to complete proposed business transactions described herein or the expected benefit of any such transactions;~~strategy;

anticipated or expected purchases or sales of assets;

our projected operating results;

completion of any pending transactions;

our ability to obtain future financing ~~arrangements;~~arrangements or restructure existing property level indebtedness;

our understanding of our competition;

market trends;

projected capital expenditures; and

the impact of technology on our operations and business.

Such forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance taking into account all information currently known to us. These beliefs, assumptions, and expectations can change as a result of many potential events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, and other objectives may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Additionally, the following factors could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements:

factors discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March ~~16, 2017,~~12, 2020, including those set forth under the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business,” and “Properties,” as ~~updated in~~supplemented by our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2020, our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form ~~10-Q;~~10-Q and other filings under the Exchange Act;

adverse effects of the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19), including a general reduction in business and ~~economic business conditions affecting the lodging~~personal travel and travel ~~industry;~~restrictions in regions where our hotels are located;

ongoing negotiations with our lenders regarding potential forbearance or the exercise by our lenders of their remedies for default under our loan agreements;

actions by our lenders to accelerate loan balances and foreclose on the hotel properties that are security for our loans that are in default;

general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common and preferred stock;

general and economic business conditions affecting the lodging and travel industry;

changes in our business or investment strategy;

availability, terms, and deployment of capital;

~~availability of qualified personnel to our advisor;~~unanticipated increases in financing and other costs, including a rise in interest rates;

changes in our industry and the market in which we operate, interest rates, or local economic conditions;

the degree and nature of our competition;

actual and potential conflicts of interest with ~~our advisor,~~Ashford Inc. and its subsidiaries (including Ashford LLC, Remington ~~Lodging & Hospitality, LLC,~~Hotels, Premier), Braemar, our executive officers and our non-independent ~~directors;~~director;

changes in personnel of Ashford LLC or the lack of availability of qualified personnel;

changes in governmental regulations, accounting rules, tax rates and similar matters;

legislative and regulatory changes, including changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related rules, regulations and interpretations governing the taxation of REITs; and

limitations imposed on our business and our ability to satisfy complex rules in order for us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

When ~~we use words or phrases such~~considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the matters summarized under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Part I of our 2019 10-K, as ~~“will likely result,” “may,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” or similar expressions, we intend~~supplemented by our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2020 and this Quarterly Report, and the discussion in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, could cause our actual results and performance to ~~identify~~differ significantly from those contained in our forward-looking statements. ~~You should~~Additionally, many of these risks and uncertainties are currently amplified by and will continue to be amplified by, or in the future may be amplified by, the COVID-19 outbreak and the numerous government travel restrictions imposed in response thereto. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts us will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee future results or performance. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking ~~statements. We are~~statements, which reflect our views as of the date of this Quarterly Report. Furthermore, we do not ~~obligated~~intend to ~~publicly~~ update ~~or revise~~ any of our forward-looking statements ~~whether~~after the date of this Quarterly Report to conform these statements to actual results and performance, except as ~~a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.~~

may be required by applicable law.

Overview

~~We believe that industry fundamentals continue to predict RevPAR growth through 2017, albeit at a slower pace. We will continue to seek ways to benefit from the cyclical nature of the hotel industry.~~

Based on our primary business objectives and forecasted operating conditions, our current key priorities and financial strategies include, among other things:

~~acquisition~~adjusting cost and operational models due to the impact of COVID-19 on the hotel ~~properties~~industry;

maintain maximum cash and cash equivalents liquidity;

negotiate forbearance and other agreements with lenders as necessary with respect to our loans that are ~~consistent with our investment strategy;~~in default;

disposition of non-core hotel properties;

pursuing capital market activities to enhance long-term stockholder value;

~~maintaining adequate liquidity;~~

implementing selective capital improvements designed to increase profitability;

implementing effective asset management strategies to minimize operating costs and increase revenues;

financing or refinancing hotels on competitive terms;

utilizing hedges and derivatives to mitigate risks; and

making other investments or divestitures that our board of directors deems ~~appropriate;~~appropriate.

Our current investment strategy is to focus on owning predominantly full-service hotels in the upper upscale segments in domestic markets that have revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) generally less than twice the U.S. national average. We believe that as supply, demand, and capital market cycles change, we will be able to shift our investment strategy to take advantage of new lodging-related investment opportunities as they may develop. Our board of directors may change our investment strategy at any time without stockholder approval or notice. We will continue to seek ways to benefit from the cyclical nature of the hotel industry.

~~maximizing stockholder returns via capital appreciation and dividends.~~

~~Recent Developments~~

~~On January 19, 2017, AHT SMA, LP, a Delaware limited partnership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of~~We are advised by Ashford ~~Trust entered into an Investment Management Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ashford Investment Management,~~ LLC, ~~(“AIM”),~~ a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., through an advisory agreement. All of the hotel properties in our portfolio are currently asset-managed by Ashford LLC. We do not have any employees. All of the services that might be provided by employees are provided to ~~manage~~us by Ashford LLC.

We do not operate any of our hotel properties directly; instead we employ hotel management companies to operate them for us under management contracts. As of March 31, 2020, Remington Hotels, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., managed 79 of our 116 hotel properties and WorldQuest. Third-party management companies managed the remaining hotel properties.

Mr. Monty J. Bennett is chairman and chief executive officer of Ashford Inc. and, together with Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., as of March 31, 2020, owned approximately 416,828 shares of Ashford Inc. common stock, which represented an approximate 16.9% ownership interest in Ashford Inc., and owned 18,758,600 shares of Ashford Inc. Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, which is exercisable (at an exercise price of $117.50 per share) into an additional approximate 3,991,191 shares of Ashford Inc. common

stock, which if exercised as of March 31, 2020 would have increased the Bennetts’ ownership interest in Ashford Inc. to 68.3%. The 18,758,600 Series D Convertible Preferred Stock owned by Mr. Monty J. Bennett and Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr. include 360,000 shares owned by trusts.

Recent Developments

COVID-19, Management’s Plans and Liquidity

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China, which subsequently spread to other regions of the world, and has resulted in significant travel restrictions and extended shutdown of numerous businesses in every state in the United States. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic. Since late February, we have experienced a significant decline in occupancy and RevPAR and we expect the significant occupancy and RevPAR reduction associated with COVID-19 to continue as we are experiencing significant reservation cancellations as well as a significant reduction in new reservations relative to prior expectations. The prolonged presence of the virus has resulted in health or other government authorities imposing widespread restrictions on travel and other businesses. The hotel industry and our portfolio have experienced the postponement or cancellation of a significant number of business conferences and similar events. Following the government mandates and health official orders, the Company temporarily suspended operations at 23 of its 116 hotels and dramatically reduced staffing and expenses at its hotels that remain operational. Operations will remain suspended until state and local government restrictions and requirements are lifted and the Company can be confident that reopening the hotels will not jeopardize the health and safety of guests, hotel employees and local communities. COVID-19 has had a significant negative impact on the Company’s operations and financial results to date. The full financial impact of the reduction in hotel demand caused by the pandemic and suspension of operations at the Company’s hotels cannot be reasonably estimated at this time due to uncertainty as to its severity and duration. The Company expects that the COVID-19 pandemic will have a significant negative impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flow in 2020. As a result, in March 2020, the Company suspended the quarterly cash dividend on its common shares for the first quarter of 2020 and likely the remainder of 2020, reduced planned capital expenditures and reduced the compensation of its board of directors, and, working closely with its hotel managers, significantly reduced its hotels’ operating expenses. The Company’s advisor adopted a remote-work policy at its corporate office in an effort to protect the health and safety of its employees and does not anticipate these policies to have any adverse impact on its ability to continue to operate its business. This transition to a remote-work environment has not had a material adverse impact on the Company's financial reporting system, internal controls or disclosure controls and procedures.

Although the Company was in compliance with all its debt covenants as of March 31, 2020, subsequent to March 31, 2020 the Company did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of its mortgage loans, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable mortgage loan, such an Event of Default caused an automatic increase in the interest rate on our outstanding loan balance for the period such Event of Default remains outstanding. Following an Event of Default, the Company’s lenders can generally elect to accelerate all principal and accrued interest payments that remain outstanding under the applicable mortgage loan and foreclose on the applicable hotel properties that are security for such loans. The lenders who hold the notes that are secured by the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square and Hilton Scotts Valley hotel in Santa Cruz, California have each sent us an acceleration notice which accelerated all payments due under the applicable loan agreement. The Company is actively negotiating the terms for forbearance agreements or waivers with its lenders. Additionally, certain of the Company's hotel properties are subject to ground leases rather than a fee simple interest, with respect to all or a portion of ~~Ashford Trust’s excess~~the real property at those hotels. It is possible the Company will default on some or all of the ground leases within the next twelve months. Based on these factors, the Company has determined that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires that in making this determination, the Company cannot consider any remedies that are outside of the Company’s control and have not been fully implemented. As a result, the Company could not consider future potential fundraising activities, whether through equity or debt offerings, dispositions of hotel properties or the likelihood of obtaining forbearance agreements as we could not conclude they were probable of being effectively implemented. Any forbearance agreement will most likely lead to increased costs, increased interest rates, additional restrictive covenants and other possible lender protections. In addition to or in lieu of obtaining forbearance agreements as described above, the Company could turn over the hotels securing the mortgage loans to the respective lenders.

The spread of COVID-19 and the recent developments surrounding the global pandemic are having significant negative impacts on our business. In response to the impact of COVID-19 on the hospitality industry, the Company is deploying numerous strategies and protocols to provide financial flexibility going forward to navigate this crisis, including:

the Company has temporarily suspended operations at 21 hotel properties. The Company’s remaining 95 hotel properties are operating at reduced levels;

the Company worked proactively with its property managers to aggressively cut operating costs at its hotels ultimately resulting in an approximate 90% reduction in property-level staffing;

the Company has significantly reduced its planned spending for capital expenditures for the fiscal year from a range of $125-$145 million to a range of $30-$50 million;

the Company has suspended its common dividend conserving approximately $7 million per quarter;

the Company has taken proactive and aggressive actions to protect liquidity and reduce corporate expenses through compensation reductions for our board of directors and the curtailment of all non-essential expenses resulting in an approximate 25% reduction in corporate, general and administrative and reimbursable expenses and will continue to take all necessary additional actions to preserve capital and liquidity;

the Company estimates that its current monthly cash ~~(the “Account”).~~ utilization at its hotels given their current state of either having suspended operations or operating with a limited capacity is approximately $20 million per month. The Company’s debt is all property-level, non-recourse debt and the monthly interest is approximately $13 million per month. The Company’s current run rate for corporate G&A and advisory fees is approximately $4 million per month;

the Company ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $240.3 million and restricted cash of $126.6 million. The vast majority of the restricted cash is comprised of lender and manager held reserves. The Company is currently working with its property managers and lenders in order to utilize lender and manager held reserves to fund operating shortfalls. At the end of the quarter, there was also $19.2 million due to the Company from third-party hotel managers, which is the Company’s cash held by one of its property managers which is also available to fund hotel operating costs;

beginning on April 1, 2020, the Company did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of its loan agreements, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents. The Company is actively working with its lenders to arrange mutually agreeable forbearance agreements to reduce its near-term cash utilization and improve liquidity; and


•	the Company has partnered with local government agencies, medical staffing organizations, and hotel brands to support COVID-19 response efforts. To date, through various initiatives, 48 Ashford Trust hotels have provided temporary lodging for first responders, healthcare professionals, and other community residents impacted by the pandemic.

Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement dated March 13, 2020 (the “Hotel Management Letter Agreement”), in order to allow Remington Hotels to better manage its corporate working capital and to ensure the continued efficient operation of our hotels, we agreed to pay the base fee and to reimburse all expenses on a weekly basis for the preceding week, rather than on a monthly basis. The Hotel Management Letter Agreement went into effect on March 13, 2020 and will continue until terminated by us.

Subsequent to March 31, 2020, certain subsidiaries of the Company ~~retained~~applied for and appointed AIM as the investment manager for us. The Agreement will govern the relationship between Ashford Trust and AIM, as well as grant AIM certain rights, powers and duties to act on behalf of the Company. AIM will not be compensated by us for its servicesreceived loans from Key Bank, N.A. under the ~~Agreement. We bear all costs~~PPP, which was established under the CARES Act. All funds borrowed under the PPP were returned on or before May 7, 2020.

Additional Developments

On January 9, 2020, we refinanced our $43.8 million mortgage loan, secured by the Le Pavillon in New Orleans, Louisiana. In connection with the refinance we reduced the loan amount by $6.8 million. The new mortgage loan totals $37.0 million. The new mortgage loan is interest only and ~~expenses~~provides for an interest rate of LIBOR + 3.40%. The stated maturity is January 2023 with two one-year extension options, subject to the ~~establishment and ongoing maintenance~~satisfaction of certain conditions. The mortgage loan is secured by the ~~Account as well as all costs and expenses of AIM.~~Le Pavillon.

On ~~February 1, 2017,~~ March 9, 2020, the Company sold the ~~Renaissance hotel~~Crowne Plaza in ~~Portsmouth, Virginia (“Renaissance Portsmouth”)~~Annapolis, Maryland for approximately ~~$9.2 million in cash.~~$5.1 million. The sale resulted in a ~~loss~~gain of ~~$43,000~~approximately $3.6 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017 and is~~March 31, 2020, which was included in “gain (loss) on sale of assets and hotel properties” in the consolidated statements of operations. ~~We repaid $20.2 million~~

On March 16, 2020, in light of ~~principal on our mortgage loan that was partially secured~~the uncertainty created by the ~~Renaissance Portsmouth.~~

~~On February 20, 2017,~~effects of COVID-19, each non-employee serving on the Company’s board of directors agreed to a 25% reduction in their annual cash retainers. In addition, effective as of May 14, 2020, the board of directors agreed further that this reduced amount would be payable 75% in cash and 25% in equity (common stock of the Company ~~appointed Mr. Douglas A. Kessler~~or common units of Ashford Trust). This arrangement will be effective until such time as ~~Chief Executive Officer~~the board of directors determines in its discretion that such effects of COVID-19 have subsided.

On March 20, 2020, Lismore Capital LLC (“Lismore”), a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., entered into an agreement with the Company to seek modifications, forbearances or refinancings of the ~~Company, effective February 21, 2017. Also~~Company’s loans (the “Ashford Trust Agreement”). Pursuant to the Ashford Trust Agreement, Lismore shall, during the agreement term (which commenced on ~~February~~March 20, ~~2017, Mr. Monty J. Bennett ceased to serve as~~2020 and shall end on the ~~Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bennett remains~~date that is twelve months following the ~~Chairman~~commencement date, or upon it being terminated by Ashford Trust on not less than thirty days written notice) negotiate the refinancing, modification or forbearance of the ~~Board. In order to provide greater focus to~~existing mortgage debt on Ashford Trust’s hotels. For the ~~Company, on April 27, 2017, Mr. Kessler resigned from~~purposes of the ~~Board~~Ashford Trust Agreement, financing shall include, without limitation, senior or subordinate loan financing, provided in any single transaction or a combination of ~~Directors of Ashford Prime and no longer is President of Ashford Prime.~~transactions, including, mortgage loan financing, mezzanine loan financing, or subordinate loan financing encumbering the applicable hotel or unsecured loan financing.

In connection with the ~~appointment~~services provided by Lismore, Lismore shall be paid an advisory fee of ~~Mr. Kessler as Chief Executive Officer~~up to 50 basis points (0.50%) of the ~~Company,~~aggregate amount of the ~~Company~~modifications, forbearances or refinancings of the Company’s mortgage and ~~Mr. Kessler entered into a Restricted Stock Award~~mezzanine debt (the “Financing”), calculated and payable as follows: (i) 0.125% of the aggregate amount of potential Financings upon execution of the Ashford Trust Agreement; (ii) 0.125% payable in six equal installments beginning April 20, 2020 and ending on September 20, 2020; provided, however, in the event Ashford Trust does not complete, for any reason, Financings during the term of the Ashford Trust Agreement ~~(the “Award Agreement”),~~equal to or greater than $4,114,740,601, then Ashford Trust shall offset, against any fees owed by Ashford Trust or its affiliates pursuant to ~~which Mr. Kessler received 359,477 shares~~the Advisory Agreement, a portion of ~~Restricted Stock (as defined in~~ the ~~Award Agreement).~~

~~On March 2, 2017, we invested an additional $650,000 in OpenKey, resulting in a 15.35% total ownership interest.~~

~~On March 6, 2017,~~fee paid by Ashford Trust to Lismore pursuant to this section equal to the ~~Company sold~~product of (x) the ~~Embassy Suites in Syracuse, New York (“Embassy Suites Syracuse”~~amount of Financings completed during the term of the Ashford Trust Agreement minus $4,114,740,601 multiplied by (y) 0.125%; and (iii) 25 basis points (0.25%) ~~for approximately $8.8 million in cash. The sale resulted in a loss of $40,000 for~~payable upon the six months ended September 30, 2017 and is included in “gain (loss) on sale of hotel properties” in the consolidated statements of operations. We repaid $20.6 million of principal on our mortgage loan that was partially securedacceptance by the ~~Embassy Suites Syracuse.~~

~~On March 7, 2017, AIM REHE Funds GP, LP (“AIM GP”), the general partner~~applicable lender of the AQUA U.S. Fund, provided written notice to Ashford Trust of its election to dissolve the AQUA U.S. Fund pursuant to Section 6.1(a) of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the AQUA U.S. Fund asany Financing. As of March 31, ~~2017. Pursuant to this election, we liquidated our investment~~2020, the Company accrued an initial deposit of $5.0 million that was subsequently paid in ~~the AQUA U.S. Fund subject to a 5% hold back of $2.6 million which was received during the second quarter of 2017 upon completion of the audit of the AQUA U.S. Fund’s financial statements.~~April 2020.

On ~~May 10, 2017, we refinanced a $105.0 million mortgage loan, secured~~April 17, 2020, the Company) was notified by the ~~Renaissance Nashville in Nashville, Tennessee and~~New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) that the Westin in Princeton, New Jersey. The new mortgage loan totals $181.0 million, of which our initial advance was $164.7 million with future advances totaling $16.3 million as reimbursement for capital expenditures. The mortgage loan is interest only

~~and provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 3.00%. Beginning on July 1, 2020, quarterly principal payments of $750,000 are due.The stated maturity is June 2022, with no extension options.~~

~~On May 23, 2017, the trial court, in the matter of~~ ~~Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, et al. v. Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.~~, issued an order compelling the company that issued the supersedeas bond, RLI Insurance Company (“RLI”), to pay approximately $10.0 million. On June 1, 2017, RLI paid Nantucket this amount and sought reimbursement from the Company. On June 27, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court denied the Company's petition for review. As a result, all of the appeals were exhausted and the judgment was final with the determination and reimbursement of attorney's fees being the only remaining dispute. On June 29, 2017, the balance of the judgment was paid to Nantucket by the Company.

The Company estimates its total loss including post judgment interest and reimbursement of the plaintiff’s legal fees to be approximately $17.3 million as of September 30, 2017, resulting in additional expense of $26,000 and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.

On June 29, 2017, RLI filed suit in Federal District Court in Dallas seeking to recover the amounts previously paid to Nantucket. On July 19, 2017, the Company paid approximately $10.0 million to RLI mooting RLI's claim subject only to the alleged claim for attorney fees. With the agreement for the Company to pay the negotiated settlement of RLI's attorney fees in the amount of $100,000, a Stipulation for Dismissal was filed on November 2, 2017.

On May 24, 2017, we refinanced a $15.7 million mortgage loan, secured by the Hotel Indigo (“Indigo Atlanta”) in Atlanta, Georgia. The new loan totals $16.1 million. The mortgage loan is interest only and provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 2.90% for the first two years with a 30-year amortization schedule based on a 6% interest rate starting in the third year. The stated maturity is June 2020, with two one-year extension options.

~~On June 29, 2017, the Company sold the Crowne Plaza Ravinia in Atlanta, Georgia for approximately $88.7 million in cash. The sale resulted in a gain of $14.1 million for the~~ ~~three and nine~~ months ended September 30, 2017 and is included in “gain (loss) on sale of hotel properties” in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company also repaid approximately $78.7 million of debt associated with the hotel property.

~~On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 3.4 million shares of 7.50% Series H cumulative preferred stock. The Series H cumulative preferred stock ranks senior to all classes or series~~average closing price of the Company’s common stock over the prior 30 consecutive trading-day period was below $1.00 per share, which is the minimum average closing price per share required to maintain listing on the NYSE under Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Company’s current intention is to cure the deficiency by implementing a one-for-ten reverse stock split of its common stock by no later than the third quarter of 2020.

The Company originally had a period of six months following the receipt of the notice to regain compliance with the minimum share price requirement. As a result of a NYSE rule filing which became effective on April 21, 2020, the applicable cure period was extended until December 26, 2020, and ~~future junior securities,~~there is the possibility of an additional extension at the discretion of the NYSE. In order to regain compliance, on the last trading day in any calendar month during the cure period, the common stock must have: (i) a closing price of at least $1.00 per share; and (ii) an average closing price of at least $1.00 per share over the 30 consecutive trading-day period ending on the last trading day of such month.

The notice has no immediate impact on the listing of the common stock, which will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE during this period, subject to the Company’s compliance with the other continued listing requirements of the NYSE. The common stock will continue to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “AHT” but will have an added designation of “.BC” to indicate the status of the common stock as “below compliance.” If the Company fails to regain compliance with Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual by the end of the cure period, the common stock will be subject to the NYSE’s suspension and delisting procedures.

Effective May 13, 2020, Douglas A. Kessler voluntarily resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer to pursue other professional opportunities. On May 14, 2020, the board of directors appointed J. Robison Hays, III as the Company’s new President and Chief Executive Officer.

Key Indicators of Operating Performance

We use a variety of operating and other information to evaluate the operating performance of our business. These key indicators include financial information that is prepared in accordance with GAAP as well as other financial measures that are non-GAAP measures. In addition, we use other information that may not be financial in nature, including statistical information and comparative data. We use this information to measure the operating performance of our individual hotels, groups of hotels and/or business as a whole. We also use these metrics to evaluate the hotels in our portfolio and potential acquisitions to determine each hotel’s contribution to cash flow and its potential to provide attractive long-term total returns. These key indicators include:


•	Occupancy. Occupancy means the total number of hotel rooms sold in a given period divided by the total number of rooms available. Occupancy measures the utilization of our hotels’ available capacity. We use occupancy to measure demand at a specific hotel or group of hotels in a given period.

•

ADR. ADR means average daily rate and is calculated by dividing total hotel rooms revenues by total number of rooms sold in a given period. ADR measures average room price attained by a hotel and ADR trends provide useful information concerning the pricing environment and the nature of the customer base of a hotel or group of hotels. We use ADR to assess the pricing levels that we are able to generate.

•

RevPAR.RevPAR means revenue per available room and is calculated by multiplying ADR by the average daily occupancy. RevPAR is one of the commonly used measures within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. RevPAR does not include revenues from food and beverage sales or parking, telephone or other non-rooms revenues generated by the property. Although RevPAR does not include these ancillary revenues, it is generally considered the leading indicator of core revenues for many hotels. We also use RevPAR to compare the results of our hotels between periods and to analyze results of our comparable hotels (comparable hotels represent hotels we have owned for the entire period). RevPAR improvements attributable to increases in occupancy are generally accompanied by increases in most categories of variable

operating costs. RevPAR improvements attributable to increases in ADR are generally accompanied by increases in limited categories of operating costs, such as management fees and franchise fees.

RevPAR changes that are primarily driven by changes in occupancy have different implications for overall revenues and profitability than changes that are driven primarily by changes in ADR. For example, an increase in occupancy at a hotel would lead to additional variable operating costs (including housekeeping services, utilities and room supplies) and could also result in increased other operating department revenue and expense. Changes in ADR typically have a greater impact on operating margins and profitability as they do not have a substantial effect on variable operating costs.

Occupancy, ADR and RevPAR are commonly used measures within the lodging industry to evaluate operating performance. RevPAR is an important statistic for monitoring operating performance at the individual hotel level and across our entire business. We evaluate individual hotel RevPAR performance on an absolute basis with comparisons to budget and prior periods, as well as on a ~~parity with each series~~regional and company-wide basis. ADR and RevPAR include only rooms revenue. Rooms revenue is dictated by demand (as measured by occupancy), pricing (as measured by ADR) and our available supply of hotel rooms.

We also use funds from operations (“FFO”), Adjusted FFO, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for real estate (“EBITDAre”) and Adjusted EBITDAre as measures of the ~~Company’s outstanding preferred stock~~operating performance of our business. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue per available room, or RevPAR, is a commonly used measure within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. RevPAR is defined as the product of the ADR charged and the average daily occupancy achieved. RevPAR does not include revenues from food and beverage or parking, telephone, or other guest services generated by the property. Although RevPAR does not include these ancillary revenues, it is generally considered the leading indicator of core revenues for many hotels. We also use RevPAR to compare the results of our hotels between periods and to analyze results of our comparable hotels (comparable hotels represent hotels we have owned for the periods under comparison). RevPAR improvements attributable to increases in occupancy are generally accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating costs. RevPAR improvements attributable to increases in ADR are generally accompanied by increases in limited categories of operating costs, such as management fees and franchise fees.

The following table summarizes changes in key line items from our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,						Favorable/ (Unfavorable) Change
	2020			2019			Favorable/ (Unfavorable) Change
Total revenue	$	281,877		$	358,718		$	(76,841	)
Total hotel operating expenses	(201,710		)	(228,486		)	26,776
Property taxes, insurance and other	(20,472		)	(20,397		)	(75		)
Depreciation and amortization	(66,350		)	(67,178		)	828
Impairment charges	(27,613		)	—			(27,613		)
Advisory services fee	(15,299		)	(16,304		)	1,005
Corporate, general and administrative	(3,492		)	(2,601		)	(891		)
Gain (loss) on sale of assets and hotel properties	3,623			233			3,390
Operating income (loss)	(49,436		)	23,985			(73,421		)
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities	(79		)	(1,063		)	984
Interest income	611			781			(170		)
Other income (expense)	1,522			(316		)	1,838
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs	(57,085		)	(66,166		)	9,081
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees	(95		)	(2,062		)	1,967
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities	(1,477		)	808			(2,285		)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	4,422			(2,994		)	7,416
Income tax (expense) benefit	(303		)	405			(708		)
Net income (loss)	(101,920		)	(46,622		)	(55,298		)
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities	48			26			22
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	17,671			8,579			9,092
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company	$	(84,201	)	$	(38,017	)	$	(46,184	)

All hotel properties owned during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 have been included in our results of operations during the respective periods in which they were owned. Based on when a hotel property was acquired or disposed, operating results for certain hotel properties are not comparable for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. The hotel properties listed below are not comparable hotel properties for the periods indicated and all other hotel properties are considered comparable hotel properties. The following acquisitions and dispositions affect reporting comparability related to our consolidated financial statements:



Hotel Property	Location	Type	Date
Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square ⁽²⁾	New York, NY	Acquisition	January 22, 2019
Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley ⁽²⁾	Santa Cruz, CA	Acquisition	February 26, 2019
San Antonio Marriott ⁽¹⁾	San Antonio, TX	Disposition	August 2, 2019
Hilton Garden Inn Wisconsin Dells ⁽¹⁾	Wisconsin Dells, WI	Disposition	August 6, 2019
Courtyard Savannah ⁽¹⁾	Savannah, GA	Disposition	August 14, 2019
SpringHill Suites Jacksonville ⁽¹⁾	Jacksonville, FL	Disposition	December 3, 2019
Crowne Plaza Annapolis ⁽¹⁾	Annapolis, MD	Disposition	March 9, 2020


⁽¹⁾	Collectively referred to as “Hotel Dispositions”


⁽²⁾	Collectively referred to as “Hotel Acquisitions”

The following table illustrates the key performance indicators of all hotel properties and WorldQuest owned for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
RevPAR (revenue per available room)	$	94.49		$	121.69
Occupancy	58.51		%	72.85		%
ADR (average daily rate)	$	161.48		$	167.05

The following table illustrates the key performance indicators of the 114 comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest that were included for the full three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
RevPAR (revenue per available room)	$	94.86		$	122.71
Occupancy	58.54		%	72.99		%
ADR (average daily rate)	$	162.04		$	168.11

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company. Net loss attributable to the Company increased $46.2 million, from $38.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 (the ~~8.55% Series A cumulative preferred stock (all shares redeemed on September 18, 2017)~~“2019 quarter”) to $84.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 (the “2020 quarter”) as a result of the factors discussed below.

Revenue.Rooms revenue from our hotel properties and WorldQuest decreased $64.6 million, or 23.0%, to $215.8 million in the ~~8.45% Series D cumulative preferred stock (1.6~~2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. This decrease is attributable to lower rooms revenue of $5.8 million ~~shares redeemed on September 18, 2017)~~from our Hotel Dispositions and $59.0 million at our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest. These decreases were partially offset by higher rooms revenue of $164,000 from our Hotel Acquisitions. Our comparable hotel properties experienced a decrease of 3.6% in room rates and a decrease of 1,445 basis points in occupancy.

Food and beverage revenue decreased $13.1 million, or 21.5%, to $48.0 million. This decrease is attributable to lower food and beverage revenue of $1.4 million from our Hotel Dispositions and $12.0 million at our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by higher food and beverage revenue of $295,000 at our Hotel Acquisitions.

Other hotel revenue, which consists mainly of Internet access, parking, spa and business interruption revenue, increased $1.1 million, or 7.1%, to $17.3 million. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase of $352,000 from our Hotel Acquisitions and $1.1 million at our comparable hotel properties. These increases were partially offset by lower other hotel revenue of $276,000

from our Hotel Dispositions. Other non-hotel revenue decreased $300,000, or 28.0%, to $772,000 in the ~~7.375% Series F cumulative preferred~~2020 quarter as compared to the 2019 quarter.

Hotel Operating Expenses. Hotel operating expenses decreased $26.8 million, or 11.7%, to $201.7 million. Hotel operating expenses consist of direct expenses from departments associated with revenue streams and indirect expenses associated with support departments and management fees. Direct expenses decreased $15.2 million in the 2020 quarter as compared to the 2019 quarter, which was comprised of a decrease of $2.0 million from our Hotel Dispositions and $13.6 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by an increase of $433,000 from our Hotel Acquisitions. Direct expenses were 32.4% of total hotel revenue for the 2020 quarter and 29.7% for the 2019 quarter. Indirect expenses and management fees decreased $11.6 million in the 2020 quarter as compared to the 2019 quarter, which was comprised of a decrease of $2.7 million from our Hotel Dispositions and $9.4 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by an increase of $508,000 from our Hotel Acquisitions.

Property Taxes, Insurance and Other. Property taxes, insurance and other expense increased $75,000, or 0.4%, to $20.5 million during the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter, which was primarily due to an increase of $277,000 from our Hotel Acquisitions and the effects of a property tax refund of $590,000 in the 2019 quarter. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $491,000 from our Hotel Dispositions and $301,000 at our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased $828,000, or 1.2%, to $66.4 million during the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter, which was primarily due to a decrease of $1.1 million from our Hotel Dispositions and $91,000 from our Hotel Acquisitions, partially offset by an increase of $387,000 at our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest.

Impairment Charges. In the 2020 quarter we recorded an impairment charge of $27.6 million that was comprised of $13.9 million at the Columbus Hampton Inn Easton, $10.0 million at the Canonsburg Homewood Suites Pittsburgh Southpointe and $3.7 million at the Phoenix Hampton Inn Airport North as a result of reduced estimated cash flows resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and changes to the expected holding periods of these hotel properties. In the 2019 quarter, there were no impairment charges.

Advisory Services Fee. Advisory services fee decreased $1.0 million, or 6.2%, to $15.3 million in the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. The advisory services fee represents fees incurred in connection with the advisory agreement between Ashford Inc. and the Company. In the 2020 quarter, the advisory services fee was comprised of a base advisory fee of $8.9 million, equity-based compensation of $4.6 million associated with equity grants of our common stock and LTIP units awarded to the ~~7.375% Series G cumulative preferred stock)~~officers and employees of Ashford Inc. and reimbursable expenses of $1.8 million. In the 2019 quarter, the advisory services fee was comprised of a base advisory fee of $9.0 million, equity-based compensation of $4.3 million associated with ~~any future parity~~equity grants of our common stock and LTIP units awarded to the officers and employees of Ashford Inc., reimbursable expenses of $2.4 million and an incentive fee of $636,000.

Corporate, General and Administrative. Corporate, general and administrative expense increased $891,000, or 34.3%, to $3.5 million during the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. The increase was primarily attributable to $698,000 of reimbursed operating expenses of Ashford Securities paid by Ashford Trust, legal and professional fees of $355,000 and public company costs of $55,000, partially offset by lower other miscellaneous expenses of $217,000.

Gain (Loss) on Sale of Assets and Hotel Properties. Gain on sale of assets and hotel properties increased $3.4 million to $3.6 million during the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. The gain in the 2020 quarter of $3.6 million was related to the sale of the Annapolis Crowne Plaza. The gain in the 2019 quarter was related to the sale of assets at the Santa Fe La Posada, Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley and Minneapolis Le Meridien related to ERFP.

Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities. Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities decreased $984,000, or 92.6% to $79,000 during the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. The 2020 quarter included equity in loss of $79,000 from OpenKey. The 2019 quarter included equity in loss of $947,000 from Ashford Inc. and $116,000 from OpenKey.

Interest Income. Interest income was $611,000 and $781,000 for the 2020 quarter and the 2019 quarter, respectively.

Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) changed $1.8 million, from expense of $316,000 in the 2019 quarter to income of $1.5 million in the 2020 quarter. In the 2020 quarter, we recorded a realized gain of $2.1 million on sale of marketable securities and ~~junior~~dividend income of $31,000. This income was partially offset by expense of $268,000 from CMBX premiums and interest paid on collateral, a realized loss of $225,000 on interest rate floors and other expense of $119,000. In the 2019 quarter, we recorded expense of $266,000 from CMBX premiums and interest paid on collateral, a realized loss of $163,000 on interest rate floors and a realized loss on sale of marketable securities of $4,000. These expenses were partially offset by dividend income of $46,000 and other income of $69,000.

Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Costs. Interest expense and amortization of loan costs decreased $9.1 million, or 13.7%, to ~~future senior~~$57.1 million during the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. The decrease is primarily due $8.7 million at our comparable hotel properties due to lower LIBOR rates and lower interest expense and amortization of loan costs of $922,000 from our Hotel Dispositions, higher interest expense and amortization of loan costs of $496,000 as a result of borrowings for Hotel Acquisitions. The average LIBOR rates in the 2020 quarter and the 2019 quarter were 1.40% and 2.50%, respectively.

Write-off of Premiums, Loan Costs and Exit Fees. Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees decreased $2.0 million to $95,000 in the 2020 quarter compared to the 2019 quarter. In the 2020 quarter, we wrote-off unamortized loan costs of $47,000 and incurred other costs of $48,000 as a result of a loan refinance. In the 2019 quarter, we wrote off $2.1 million of loan costs related to the refinance of a mortgage loan.

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities. Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities ~~and~~changed $2.3 million, from a gain of $808,000 in the 2019 quarter to ~~all~~a loss of $1.5 million in the 2020 quarter. The unrealized loss in the 2020 quarter is primarily attributable to the recognition of the ~~Company’s existing~~realized gain upon the sale of marketable securities. The unrealized loss that is based on changes in closing market prices during the quarter was $15,000.

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives. Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives changed $7.4 million, from a loss of $3.0 million in the 2019 quarter to a gain of $4.4 million in the 2020 quarter. In the 2020 quarter, we recognized unrealized gains of $3.9 million related to CMBX tranches, $377,000 from interest rate floors and ~~future indebtedness,~~$225,000 associated with ~~respect~~the recognition of realized losses from the termination of interest rate floors, partially offset by an unrealized loss of $52,000 associated with interest rate caps. In 2019 quarter, we recognized an unrealized loss of $2.3 million related to CMBX tranches, $642,000 associated with interest rate caps and $197,000 from interest rate floors. These losses were partially offset by an unrealized gain of $163,000 associated with the recognition of realized losses from the termination of interest rate floors. The fair value of interest rate floors and interest rate caps are primarily based on movements in the LIBOR forward curve and the passage of time. The fair value of credit default swaps is based on the change in value of CMBX indices.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit. Income tax (expense) benefit changed $708,000, from income tax benefit of $405,000 in the 2019 quarter to an income tax expense of $303,000 in the 2020 quarter. This change was primarily due to an increase in the profitability of our TRS entities in the 2020 quarter compared to the ~~payment~~2019 quarter. TRS profits increased because of ~~dividends~~a significant decrease in TRS rent expense, which is the result of a significant decrease in projected 2020 hotel revenues due to COVID-19, partially offset by lower hotel operating profit.

(Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Entities. Our noncontrolling interest partner in consolidated entities were allocated a loss of $48,000 and $26,000 in the 2020 quarter and the ~~distribution of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s affairs. On September 8, 2017, we issued 400,000 additional shares of 7.50% Series H preferred stock pursuant~~2019 quarter, respectively.

Net (Income) Loss Attributable to ~~the over-allotment option.~~

~~On August 31, 2017, we invested an additional $333,000~~Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in ~~OpenKey, resulting~~Operating Partnership. Net loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in ~~a 16.23% total ownership interest.~~

~~On October 30, 2017, we refinanced our $94.7~~operating partnership increased $9.1 million, ~~mortgage loan, with an outstanding balance of $94.5~~from $8.6 million secured by the Hilton Boston Back Bay in Boston, Massachusetts. The new mortgage loan totals $97.0 million, provides for a floating interest rate of LIBOR + 2.00%, a five-year term with no extension options and is secured by the Hilton Boston Back Bay.

~~Dividends on the Series H cumulative preferred stock accrue~~ in the ~~amount of $1.8750 per share each year, which is equivalent~~2019 quarter to 7.50% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share of Series H cumulative preferred stock. Dividends on the Series H cumulative preferred stock are payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of January, April, July and October of each year (or, if not on a business day, on the next succeeding business day). The first dividend on the Series H cumulative preferred stock sold in this offering was paid on October 16, 2017$17.7 million in the ~~amount~~2020 quarter. Redeemable noncontrolling interests represented ownership interests of ~~$0.1875 per share.~~

~~On September 18, 2017,~~15.71% and 14.99% in the ~~Company redeemed its 8.55% Series A cumulative preferred stock~~operating partnership at ~~a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued~~March 31, 2020 and ~~unpaid dividends through the redemption date, in an amount equal to $0.4631 per share, for a total redemption price of $25.4631 per share.~~

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

COVID-19, Management’s Plans and Liquidity

capital expenditures and reduced the compensation of its board of directors, and, working closely with its hotel managers, significantly reduced its hotels’ operating expenses. The Company’s advisor adopted a remote-work policy at its corporate office in an effort to protect the health and safety of its employees and does not anticipate these policies to have any adverse impact on its ability to continue to operate its business. This transition to a remote-work environment has not had a material adverse impact on the Company's financial reporting system, internal controls or disclosure controls and procedures.

the Company has temporarily suspended operations at 21 hotel properties. The Company’s remaining 95 hotel properties are operating at reduced levels;

the Company worked proactively with its property managers to aggressively cut operating costs at its hotels ultimately resulting in an approximate 90% reduction in property-level staffing;

the Company has significantly reduced its planned spending for capital expenditures for the fiscal year from a range of $125-$145 million to a range of $30-$50 million;

the Company has suspended its common dividend conserving approximately $7 million per quarter;

the Company currently estimates that its monthly cash utilization at its hotels given their current state of either having suspended operations or operating with limited operations is approximately $15 million per month. The Company’s debt is all property-level, non-recourse debt and the monthly interest is approximately $13 million per month. The Company’s current run rate for corporate G&A and advisory fees is approximately $4 million per month;


•	the Company has partnered with local government agencies, medical staffing organizations, and hotel brands to support

COVID-19 response efforts. To date, through various initiatives, 48 Ashford Trust hotels have provided temporary lodging for first responders, healthcare professionals, and other community residents impacted by the pandemic.

Our cash position from operations is affected primarily by macro industry movements in occupancy and rate as well as our ability to control costs. Further, interest rates can greatly affect the cost of our debt service as well as the value of any financial hedges we may put in place. We monitor industry fundamentals and interest rates very closely. Capital expenditures above our reserves will affect cash flow as well.

Certain of our loan agreements contain cash trap provisions that may get triggered if the performance of our ~~hotel properties declines.~~hotels decline. When these provisions are triggered, substantially all of the profit generated by ~~the hotel properties securing such loan~~our hotels is deposited directly into lockbox accounts and then swept into cash management accounts for the benefit of our various lenders. Cash is distributed to us only after certain items are paid, including deposits into ground lease and maintenance reserves and the payment of debt service, insurance, taxes, operating expenses, and extraordinary capital expenditures and ground lease expenses. This could affect our liquidity and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders until such time that a cash trap is no longer in effect for such loan.

~~Also, we~~We have entered into certain customary guaranty agreements pursuant to which we guaranty payment of any recourse liabilities of our subsidiaries or joint ventures that may result from non-recourse carve-outs, which include, but are not limited to fraud, misrepresentation, willful misconduct resulting in waste, misappropriations of rents following an event of default, voluntary bankruptcy filings, unpermitted transfers of collateral, delinquency of trade payables and certain environmental liabilities. Certain of these guarantees represent a guaranty of material amounts, and if we are required to make payments under those guarantees, our liquidity could be adversely affected. ~~In connection~~

Pursuant to the advisory agreement between us and our advisor, we must pay our advisor on a monthly basis a base management fee, subject to a minimum base management fee. The minimum base management fee is equal to the greater of: (i) 90% of the base fee paid for the same month in the prior fiscal year; and (ii) 1/12th of the “G&A Ratio” for the most recently completed fiscal quarter multiplied by our total market capitalization on the last balance sheet date included in the most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q or annual report on Form 10-K that we file with the ~~Ashford Prime Spin-off,~~SEC. Thus, even if our total market capitalization and performance decline, we ~~are~~will still ~~jointly~~be required to make payments to our advisor equal to the minimum base management fee, which could adversely impact our liquidity and ~~severally liable under certain carve-out guarantees~~financial condition.

These factors and ~~environmental indemnities associated with three loans. Ashford Prime has indemnified us in the case that any of these guarantees are ever called.~~others could affect our liquidity and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

On ~~February 1,~~December 5, 2017, the board of directors reapproved a stock repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which the board of directors granted a repurchase authorization to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share having an aggregate value of up to $200 million. The board of directors’ authorization replaced any previous repurchase authorizations. No shares were repurchased during the three months ended March 31, 2020 pursuant to the Repurchase Program.

On December 11, 2017, we ~~repaid $20.2~~entered into equity distribution agreements with certain sales agents to sell from time to time shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million. Sales of shares of our common stock, if any, may be made in negotiated transactions or transactions that are deemed to be “at-the-market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act, including sales made directly on the NYSE, the existing trading market for our common stock, or sales made to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or through an electronic communications network. We will pay each of the sales agents a commission, which in each case shall not be more than 2.0% of the gross sales price of the shares of our common stock sold through such sales agent. No shares were issued during the three months ended March 31, 2020. As of March 31, 2020, we have issued approximately 2.4 million shares of ~~principal on~~ our ~~mortgage loan that was partially secured by~~common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $15.5 million leaving approximately $84.5 million available under the ~~Renaissance Portsmouth. This hotel property was sold on February 1, 2017.~~program.

On ~~March 6, 2017, we repaid $20.6 million of principal on our mortgage loan that was partially secured by the Embassy Suites Syracuse. This hotel property was sold on March 6, 2017.~~

~~On May 10, 2017,~~January 9, 2020, we refinanced ~~a $105.0~~our $43.8 million mortgage loan, secured by the ~~Renaissance Nashville~~Le Pavillon in ~~Nashville, Tennessee and~~New Orleans, Louisiana. In connection with the ~~Westin in Princeton, New Jersey.~~refinance we reduced the loan amount by $6.8 million. The new mortgage loan totals ~~$181.0 million, of which our initial advance was $164.7 million with future advances totaling $16.3 million as reimbursement for capital expenditures.~~$37.0 million. The new mortgage loan is interest only and provides for ~~a floating~~an interest rate of LIBOR + ~~3.00%~~3.40%. ~~Beginning on July 1, 2020, quarterly principal payments of $750,000 are due.~~The stated maturity is ~~June 2022, with no extension options.~~

~~On June 29, 2017, we repaid $78.7 million of principal on our mortgage loan partially secured by the Crowne Plaza Ravinia. This hotel property was sold on June 29, 2017.~~

On August 25, 2017, the Company issued 3.4 million shares of 7.50% Series H cumulative preferred stock. The Series H cumulative preferred stock ranks senior to all classes or series of the Company’s common stock and future junior securities, on a parity with each series of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock (the 8.55% Series A cumulative preferred stock (all shares redeemed on September 18, 2017), the 8.45% Series D cumulative preferred stock (1.6 million shares redeemed on September 18, 2017), the 7.375% Series F cumulative preferred stock and the 7.375% Series G cumulative preferred stock) and with any future parity securities and junior to future senior securities and to all of the Company’s existing and future indebtedness, with respect

options, subject to the ~~payment~~satisfaction of dividends and the distribution of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s affairs. On September 8, 2017, we issued 400,000 additional shares of 7.50% Series H preferred stock pursuant to the over-allotment option.

Dividends on the Series H cumulative preferred stock accrue in the amount of $1.8750 per share each year, which is equivalent to 7.50% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share of Series H cumulative preferred stock. Dividends on the Series H cumulative preferred stock are payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of January, April, July and October of each year (or, if not on a business day, on the next succeeding business day).certain conditions. The ~~first dividend on the Series H cumulative preferred stock sold in this offering was paid on October 16, 2017 in the amount of $0.1875 per share.~~

Sources and ~~Sheraton Indianapolis.~~Uses of Cash

Our principal sources of funds to meet our cash requirements include: cash on hand, ~~positive~~ cash flow from operations, capital market activities, property refinancing proceeds and asset sales. Additionally, our principal uses of funds are expected to include possible operating shortfalls, owner-funded capital expenditures, dividends, new investments, and debt interest and principal payments. Items that impacted our cash flow and liquidity during the periods indicated are summarized as follows:

Net Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities. Net cash flows provided by operating activities, pursuant to our consolidated statements of cash flows, which includes changes in balance sheet items, were ~~$178.5~~$11.9 million and ~~$191.0~~$26.8 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~,2019, respectively. Cash flows from operations were impacted by changes in hotel operations, our hotel acquisitions in 2019, our hotel dispositions in ~~2016~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2020 as well as the timing of collecting receivables

from hotel guests, paying vendors, settling with derivative counterparties, settling with related parties and settling with hotel managers.

Net Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, net cash flows used in investing activities were ~~$6.8~~$15.6 million. Cash outflows primarily consisted of ~~$164.1~~$20.4 million for capital improvements made to various hotel properties, partially offset by cash inflows of $4.7 million from proceeds received from the sale of the Crowne Plaza Annapolis.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, net cash flows used in investing activities were $242.1 million. Cash outflows primarily consisted of $38.0 million for capital improvements made to various hotel properties and ~~an additional $983,000 investment in OpenKey.~~$212.8 million primarily for the acquisitions of the Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley and Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square. Cash outflows were partially offset by ~~cash inflows of $105.3~~$5.0 million from proceeds received from the ~~sales~~sale of ~~the Renaissance Portsmouth, Embassy Suites Syracuse~~FF&E for ERFP and ~~Crowne Plaza Ravinia, $50.9~~$4.0 million of proceeds from the liquidation of our interest in the AQUA U.S. Fund and $2.4 million from property insurance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, net cash flows provided by investing activities were $27.3 million. Cash inflows primarily consisted of $168.8 million from the sales of a five-hotel portfolio, the Hampton Inn Gainesville and a vacant lot associated with the Le Pavillon Hotel. These cash inflows were partially offset by $137.9 million for capital improvements made to various hotel properties, $2.1 million for the purchase of land underlying the San Antonio Marriott and a WorldQuest unit and a $2.0 million investment in OpenKey.franchise agreement extension.

Net Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, net cash flows used in financing activities were ~~$137.5~~$27.5 million. Cash outflows ~~primarily consisted of $246.1~~were $45.3 million for repayments of indebtedness, ~~$80.6 million for the redemption of preferred stock, $75.6~~$18.0 million for dividend payments to common and preferred stockholders and unitholders ~~$5.8~~and $1.2 million for payments of loan costs and exit fees, ~~$1.3 million for the repurchase of common stock and $633,000 of payments for derivatives. Cash outflows were~~ partially offset by cash inflows of ~~$180.8~~$37.0 million from

borrowings on ~~indebtedness and $91.6 million from the issuance of preferred stock.~~ indebtedness.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2019, net cash flows ~~used in~~provided by financing activities were ~~$179.2~~$170.2 million. Cash ~~outflows~~inflows primarily consisted of ~~$141.5~~$385.0 million of borrowings on indebtedness. Cash inflows were partially offset by cash outflows of $179.6 million for repayments of indebtedness, ~~$115.8 million for the redemption of preferred stock, $69.3~~$25.0 million for dividend payments to common and preferred stockholders and unitholders, ~~$5.1~~$8.9 million for payments of loan costs and exit fees and ~~$732,000~~$903,000 for the repurchase of common stock. ~~Cash outflows were partially offset by cash inflows of $115.8 million from the issuance of preferred stock and $37.5 million from borrowings on indebtedness.~~

We are required to maintain certain financial ratios under various debt and derivative agreements. If we violate covenants in any debt or derivative agreement, we could be required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Presently, our existing financial debt covenants primarily relate to maintaining minimum net worth and leverage ratios and liquidity. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we were in compliance in all material respects with all covenants or other requirements set forth in our debt and related agreements. Subsequent to March 31, 2020 the Company did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of its mortgage loans, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents.

Mortgage and mezzanine loans are nonrecourse to the borrowers, except for customary exceptions or carve-outs that trigger recourse liability to the borrowers in certain limited instances. Recourse obligations typically include only the payment of costs and liabilities suffered by lenders as a result of the occurrence of certain bad acts on the part of the borrower. However, in certain cases, carve-outs could trigger recourse obligations on the part of the borrower with respect to repayment of all or a portion of the outstanding principal amount of the loans. We have entered into customary guaranty agreements pursuant to which we guaranty payment of any recourse liabilities of the borrowers that result from non-recourse carve-outs (which include, but are not limited to, fraud, misrepresentation, willful conduct resulting in waste, misappropriations of rents following an event of default, voluntary bankruptcy filings, unpermitted transfers of collateral, and certain environmental liabilities). In the opinion of management, none of these guaranty agreements, either individually or in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial ~~condition as of September 30, 2017.~~condition.

Based on our current level of operations, management ~~believes~~can provide no assurances that our cash flow from operations and our existing cash balances will be adequate to meet upcoming anticipated requirements for interest and principal payments on debt (excluding any potential final maturity payments), working capital, and capital expenditures for the next 12 ~~months.~~months and dividends required to maintain our status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. With respect to upcoming ~~debt~~ maturities, no assurances can be given that we will ~~continue~~be able to ~~proactively address~~refinance our ~~future~~2020 final debt maturities. NoAdditionally, no assurances can be given that we will obtain additional financings or, if we do, what the amount and terms will be. Our failure to obtain future financing under favorable terms could adversely impact our ability to execute our business ~~strategy. In addition, we~~strategy or may ~~selectively pursue debt financing on individual properties.~~result in lender foreclosure.

We are committed to an investment strategy where we will ~~opportunistically~~ pursue hotel-related investments as suitable situations arise. Funds for future hotel-related investments are expected to be derived, in whole or in part, from cash on hand, future borrowings under a ~~potential future~~ credit facility or other loans, or proceeds from additional issuances of common stock, preferred stock, or other securities, asset sales, and joint ventures. However, we have no formal commitment or understanding to invest in additional assets, and there can be no assurance that we will successfully make additional investments. We may, when conditions are suitable, consider additional capital raising opportunities.

Our existing hotel properties are mostly located in developed areas with competing hotel properties. Future occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR of any individual hotel could be materially and adversely affected by an increase in the number or quality of competitive

hotel properties, home sharing companies or apartment operators offering short-term rentals in its market area. Competition could also affect the quality and quantity of future investment opportunities.

Dividend Policy. ~~During the three month periods ended September 30, 2017 and~~ ~~2016, the board of directors declared quarterly dividends of $0.12 per share of outstanding common stock.~~ In December ~~2016,~~2019, the board of directors approved our ~~2017~~2020 dividend policy which ~~anticipates~~stated our then-expectation to pay a quarterly dividend payment of ~~$0.12~~$0.06 per share for 2020. As previously disclosed, the ~~remainder~~approval of ~~2017. However, the adoption of a~~our dividend policy ~~does~~did not commit our board of directors to declare future dividends. On March 16, 2020, the Company and its board of directors announced a suspension of its previously disclosed 2020 common stock dividend policy. The Company did not pay a dividend on its common stock for the first quarter ended March 31, 2020. The board of directors will continue to review our dividend policy ~~on a quarterly basis.~~and make future announcements with respect thereto. We may incur indebtedness to meet distribution requirements imposed on REITs under the ~~Internal Revenue~~ Code to the extent that working capital and cash flow from our investments are insufficient to fund required distributions. Alternatively, we may elect to pay dividends on our common stock in cash or a combination of cash and shares of securities as permitted under U.S. federal income tax laws governing REIT distribution requirements. We may pay dividends in excess of our cash flow.

~~RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

RevPAR is a commonly used measure within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. RevPAR is defined as the product of the ADR charged and the average daily occupancy achieved. RevPAR does not include revenues from food and beverage or parking, telephone, or other guest services generated by the property. Although RevPAR does not include these ancillary revenues, it is generally considered the leading indicator of core revenues for many hotels. We also use RevPAR to compare the results of our hotel properties between periods and to analyze results of our comparable hotel properties (comparable hotel properties represent hotel properties we have owned for the entire period). RevPAR improvements attributable to increases in occupancy are generally accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating costs. RevPAR improvements attributable to increases in ADR are generally accompanied by increases in limited categories of operating costs, such as management fees and franchise fees.

~~The following table summarizes changes in key line items from our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended September 30,
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
Change
2017 2016 2017 2016
Total revenue $ 353,325
$ 371,931
$ (18,606 ) $ 1,097,704
$ 1,150,373
$ (52,669 )
Total hotel operating expenses (226,571 ) (234,553 ) 7,982
(688,554 ) (714,692 ) 26,138
Property taxes, insurance and other (18,194 ) (17,172 ) (1,022 ) (55,293 ) (55,077 ) (216 )
Depreciation and amortization (60,135 ) (60,170 ) 35
(185,380 ) (182,411 ) (2,969 )
Impairment charges (1,785 ) (4,922 ) 3,137
(1,785 ) (4,695 ) 2,910
Transaction costs —
(124 ) 124
(11 ) (201 ) 190
Advisory services fee (14,612 ) (11,948 ) (2,664 ) (39,482 ) (34,927 ) (4,555 )
Corporate general and administrative (2,412 ) (1,968 ) (444 ) (10,836 ) (6,426 ) (4,410 )
Operating income (loss) 29,616
41,074
(11,458 ) 116,363
151,944
(35,581 )
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities (679 ) (560 ) (119 ) (3,580 ) (4,432 ) 852
Interest income 706
92
614
1,460
229
1,231
Gain (loss) on sale of hotel properties 15
1,448
(1,433 ) 14,024
24,428
(10,404 )
Other income (expense) (273 ) (926 ) 653
(3,539 ) (4,263 ) 724
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs (56,963 ) (55,762 ) (1,201 ) (167,224 ) (168,167 ) 943
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees —
(972 ) 972
(1,629 ) (4,913 ) 3,284
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities (936 ) —
(936 ) (4,813 ) —
(4,813 )
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (1,479 ) (9,548 ) 8,069
(1,804 ) 4,248
(6,052 )
Income tax (expense) benefit 1,267
16
1,251
507
(1,216 ) 1,723
Net income (loss) (28,726 ) (25,138 ) (3,588 ) (50,235 ) (2,142 ) (48,093 )
(Income) loss from consolidated entities attributable to noncontrolling interests (22 ) (16 ) (6 ) (4 ) 16
(20 )
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership 6,940
5,009
1,931
13,202
2,745
10,457
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company $ (21,808 ) $ (20,145 ) $ (1,663 ) $ (37,037 ) $ 619
$ (37,656 )

All hotel properties owned during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been included in our results of operations during the respective periods in which they were owned. Based on when a hotel property was acquired or disposed, operating results for certain hotel properties are not comparable for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The hotel properties listed below are not comparable hotel properties for the periods indicated and all other hotel properties are considered comparable hotel properties. The following dispositions affect reporting comparability related to our consolidated financial statements:



~~Hotel Property~~	~~Location~~	~~Type~~	~~Date~~
~~5-hotel portfolio~~⁽¹⁾	~~Various~~	~~Disposition~~	~~June 1, 2016~~
~~Hampton Inn & Suites~~⁽¹⁾	~~Gainesville, FL~~	~~Disposition~~	~~September 1, 2016~~
~~SpringHill Suites Gaithersburg~~⁽¹⁾	~~Gaithersburg, MD~~	~~Disposition~~	~~October 1, 2016~~
~~2-hotel portfolio~~⁽¹⁾	~~Palm Desert, CA~~	~~Disposition~~	~~October 7, 2016~~
~~Renaissance~~ ⁽¹⁾	~~Portsmouth, VA~~	~~Disposition~~	~~February 1, 2017~~
~~Embassy Suites~~ ⁽¹⁾	~~Syracuse, NY~~	~~Disposition~~	~~March 6, 2017~~
~~Crowne Plaza Ravinia~~ ⁽¹⁾	~~Atlanta, GA~~	~~Disposition~~	~~June 29, 2017~~

⁽¹⁾~~Collectively reported as “Hotel Dispositions”~~

~~The following table illustrates the key performance indicators of all hotel properties and WorldQuest owned for the periods indicated:~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
RevPAR (revenue per available room) $ 124.33
$ 122.24
$ 125.12
$ 121.51
Occupancy 79.60 % 79.36 % 78.52 % 78.47 %
ADR (average daily rate) $ 156.19
$ 154.02
$ 159.34
$ 154.84

The following table illustrates the key performance indicators of the 120 comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest that were included for the full three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
RevPAR (revenue per available room) $ 124.33
$ 124.42
$ 125.81
$ 124.3
Occupancy 79.60 % 79.65 % 78.68 % 78.63 %
ADR (average daily rate) $ 156.19
$ 156.22
$ 159.90
$ 158.09

~~Comparison of the Three Months Ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~

~~Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company.~~ Net income (loss) attributable to the Company increased $1.7 million, from a net loss of $20.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, (the “2016 quarter”) to a net loss of $21.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, (the “2017 quarter”) as a result of the factors discussed below.

~~Revenue.~~Rooms revenue from our hotel properties and WorldQuest decreased $11.9 million, or 3.9%, to $289.0 million in the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. This decrease is primarily attributable to lower rooms revenue of $11.6 million related to our Hotel Dispositions and lower rooms revenue of $240,000 from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, which experienced a decrease of 5 basis points in occupancy.

Food and beverage revenue decreased $7.9 million, or 14.0%, to $48.3 million. This decrease is attributable to lower food and beverage revenue of $5.5 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, primarily attributable to approximately $1.0 million associated with the renovation of the DFW Airport Marriott in Irving, Texas and unfavorable year over year changes in the Jewish and July 4th holiday calendar, as well as lower food and beverage revenue of $2.4 million related to our Hotel Dispositions.

~~Other hotel revenue, which consists mainly of Internet access, parking and spa, increased~~ ~~$617,000~~, or 4.3%, to $15.0 million. This increase is attributable to higher other hotel revenue of $917,000 from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by lower other hotel revenue of $300,000 related to our Hotel Dispositions. Other non-hotel revenue increased $528,000, or 114.5%, to $989,000 in the 2017 quarter as compared to the 2016 quarter.

~~Hotel Operating Expenses.~~ ~~Hotel operating expenses decreased~~ ~~$8.0 million~~, or 3.4%, to $226.6 million. Hotel operating expenses consist of direct expenses from departments associated with revenue streams and indirect expenses associated with support departments and management fees. We experienced a decrease of $5.5 million in direct expenses in the 2017 quarter as compared to the 2016 quarter, which was comprised of a decrease of $4.6 million related to our Hotel Dispositions and a decrease of $931,000 from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest. Direct expenses were 30.3% of total hotel revenue for the 2017 quarter and 30.2% for the 2016 quarter. We experienced a decrease of ~~$2.5 million~~ ~~in indirect expenses and management fees in the~~ ~~2017~~ quarter as compared to the 2016 quarter, which was comprised of a decrease of $4.8 million from our Hotel Dispositions, partially offset by an increase of $2.3 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest. The increase from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest is primarily attributable to uninsured hurricane related costs of $3.7 million.

~~Property Taxes, Insurance and Other.~~ ~~Property taxes, insurance and other increased~~ ~~$1.0 million, or 6.0%, to~~ ~~$18.2 million~~ during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $1.8 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by a $738,000 decrease from our Hotel Dispositions.

~~Depreciation and Amortization.~~ ~~Depreciation and amortization~~ de~~creased~~ ~~$35,000~~, or 0.1%, to $60.1 million during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $2.1 million related to our Hotel Dispositions partially offset by an increase of $2.0 million of depreciation and amortization at our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest.

~~Impairment Charges.~~ Impairment charges decreased $3.1 million, or 63.7%, to $1.8 million in the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. We recorded an impairment charge of $1.8 million in the 2017 quarter for damages to hotel properties from Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. We recorded an impairment charge of $4.9 million in the 2016 quarter, which is comprised of an impairment charge of $5.0 million on the SpringHill Suites Gaithersburg, partially offset by an impairment credit of $117,000 related to a valuation adjustment on a previously impaired mezzanine loan.

~~Transaction Costs.~~ ~~Transaction costs decreased $124,000, or 100.0%, to $0 during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter.~~

~~Advisory Services Fee.~~ Advisory services fee increased $2.7 million, or 22.3%, to $14.6 million in the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter, which represented fees paid in connection with the advisory agreement between Ashford Inc. and the Company. For the 2017 quarter, the advisory services fee was comprised of a base advisory fee of $8.6 million, reimbursable expenses of $1.6 million and equity-based compensation of $4.4 million associated with equity grants of our common stock and LTIP units awarded to the officers and employees of Ashford Inc. For the 2016 quarter, the advisory services fee was comprised of a base advisory fee of $8.6 million, reimbursable expenses of $1.5 million and equity-based compensation of $1.9 million associated with equity grants of our common stock and LTIP units awarded to the officers and employees of Ashford Inc.

~~Corporate General and Administrative.~~ Corporate general and administrative expense increased $444,000, or 22.6%, to $2.4 million during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. The increase was primarily attributable to higher public company costs, office expenses, professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses of $388,000 and $56,000 of transaction, acquisition and management conversion costs in the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter.

~~Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities.~~ We recorded equity in loss of unconsolidated entities of $679,000 and $560,000 for the 2017 and 2016 quarters, respectively. The 2017 quarter included equity in loss of $568,000 from Ashford Inc. and $111,000 from OpenKey. The 2016 quarter included equity in loss of $395,000 from the AQUA U.S. Fund, $85,000 from Ashford Inc. and $80,000 from OpenKey.

~~Interest Income.~~ ~~Interest income was $706,000 and $92,000 for the 2017 quarter and the 2016 quarter, respectively.~~

~~Gain (Loss) on Sale of Hotel Properties.~~ Gain on sale of hotel properties was $15,000 and $1.4 million in the 2017 and 2016 quarters, respectively. The gain in the 2017 quarter was related to the sale of the Crowne Plaza Ravinia. The gain in the 2016 quarter was related to the sale of the Hampton Inn Gainesville.

~~Other Income (Expense).~~ ~~Other expense decreased $653,000, or 70.5%, to~~ ~~$273,000~~ during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. In the 2017 quarter, we recognized realized losses of $1.2 million related to the termination of a CMBX tranche and $257,000 related to CMBX premiums and usage fees, partially offset by a realized gain of $948,000 related to marketable securities, dividend income of $109,000 and miscellaneous income of $102,000. In the 2016 quarter, we recognized a realized

~~loss of $547,000 related to the termination of a CMBX tranche, a realized loss of $156,000 related to the maturity of options on futures contracts and $237,000 of CMBX premiums and usage fees.~~

~~Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Costs.~~ Interest expense and amortization of loan costs increased $1.2 million, or 2.2%, to $57.0 million during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. The increase is primarily due to higher interest expense and amortization of loan costs of $4.3 million from refinances and an increase in LIBOR rates on our comparable hotels properties, partially offset by lower interest expense and amortization of loan costs of $3.1 million from our Hotel Dispositions. The average LIBOR rates in the 2017 quarter and the 2016 quarter were 1.23% and 0.51%, respectively.

~~Write-off of Premiums, Loan Costs and Exit Fees.~~ Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees decreased $1.0 million, or 100.0%, to $0 during the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. In the 2016 quarter, we incurred write-off of loan costs and exit fees of $972,000 resulting from the write-off of unamortized loan costs of $460,000 and exit fees of $512,000 related to the sale of the Hampton Inn Gainesville.

~~Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities.~~ Unrealized loss on marketable securities was $936,000 in the 2017 quarter, which was based on changes in closing market prices during the quarter. There was no unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities in the 2016 quarter.

~~Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives.~~ Unrealized loss on derivatives decreased $8.1 million, from $9.5 million in the 2016 quarter to $1.5 million in the 2017 quarter. In the 2017 quarter, we recognized unrealized losses of $2.3 million, $291,000 and $96,000 associated with CMBX tranches, interest rate floors and interest rate caps, respectively. These unrealized losses were partially offset by an unrealized gain of $1.2 million associated with the reclassification to other income (expense) for the recognition of a realized loss from a CMBX tranche termination. In the 2016 quarter, we recorded unrealized losses of $8.2 million, $1.9 million, $155,000 and $40,000 on interest rate floors, open CMBX tranches, options on futures contracts and interest rate derivatives, respectively. These unrealized losses were partially offset by unrealized gains of $547,000 and $156,000 associated with the reclassification to other income (expense) for the recognition of a realized loss from a CMBX tranche termination and maturity of an option on futures contracts, respectively. The fair value of interest rate floors and interest rate derivatives are primarily based on movements in the LIBOR forward curve and the passage of time. The fair value of options on futures contracts is determined based on the last reported settlement price as of the measurement date. The fair value of credit default swaps is based on the change in value of CMBX indices.

~~Income Tax (Expense) Benefit.~~ Income tax benefit increased $1.3 million, from $16,000 in the 2016 quarter to $1.3 million in the 2017 quarter. The increase in income tax benefit is primarily due to a decrease in taxable income recognized by our TRS entities.

~~(Income) Loss from Consolidated Entities Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests.~~ ~~Our noncontrolling interest partner in consolidated entities was allocated income of~~ ~~$22,000~~ ~~and~~ ~~$16,000~~ ~~for the~~ ~~2017~~ ~~quarter and the~~ ~~2016~~ ~~quarter, respectively.~~

~~Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership.~~ Redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership were allocated net loss of $6.9 million and $5.0 million in the 2017 quarter and the 2016 quarter, respectively. Redeemable noncontrolling interests represented ownership interests of 15.73% and 14.01% in the operating partnership at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~Comparison of the Nine Months Ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~

~~Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company.~~ Net income (loss) attributable to the Company changed $37.7 million, from net income of $619,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (the “2016 period”) to a net loss of $37.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 (the “2017 period”) as a result of the factors discussed below.

~~Revenue.~~Rooms revenue from our hotel properties and WorldQuest decreased $40.5 million, or 4.4%, to $876.9 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. This decrease is primarily attributable to lower rooms revenue of $47.8 million related to our Hotel Dispositions, partially offset by higher rooms revenue of $7.3 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, which experienced an increase of 1.1% in room rates and an increase of 5 basis points in occupancy.

Food and beverage revenue decreased $13.5 million, or 7.1%, to $175.0 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. This decrease is attributable to lower food and beverage revenue of $6.0 million related to our Hotel Dispositions and lower food and beverage revenue of $7.5 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, primarily attributable to approximately $1.3 million associated with the renovation of the DFW Airport Marriott in Irving, Texas as well as unfavorable year over year changes in the Jewish and July 4th holiday calendar.

Other hotel revenue, which consists mainly of Internet access, parking and spa, increased $507,000, or 1.2%, to $43.7 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. This increase is primarily attributable to higher other revenue of $2.0 million

from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by lower other revenue of $1.5 million related to our Hotel Dispositions. Other non-hotel revenue increased $755,000, or 58.2%, to $2.1 million in the 2017 period.

~~Hotel Operating Expenses.~~ Hotel operating expenses decreased $26.1 million, or 3.7%, to $688.6 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. Hotel operating expenses consist of direct expenses from departments associated with revenue streams and indirect expenses associated with support departments and management fees. We experienced a decrease in direct expenses of $15.7 million in the 2017 period as compared to the 2016 period, which was comprised of a decrease of $16.4 million related to our Hotel Dispositions, partially offset by an increase of $717,000 from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest. Direct expenses were 29.8% of total hotel revenue for both the 2017 and 2016 periods. We experienced a decrease in indirect expenses and management fees of $10.5 million in the 2017 period as compared to the 2016 period, which was comprised of a decrease of $18.3 million from our Hotel Dispositions, partially offset by an increase of $3.8 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, primarily attributable to uninsured hurricane related costs of $3.7 million, and $4.1 million associated with an additional accrual related to the final judgment in the lawsuit captioned ~~Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, et al. v. Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.~~ ~~See note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Property Taxes, Insurance and Other.~~ Property taxes, insurance and other increased $216,000 or 0.4%, to $55.3 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. The increase was primarily due to $2.9 million from our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by a decrease of $2.7 million from our Hotel Dispositions.

~~Depreciation and Amortization.~~ Depreciation and amortization increased $3.0 million or 1.6%, to $185.4 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. The increase was primarily due to $10.5 million of depreciation and amortization at our comparable hotel properties and WorldQuest, partially offset by a decrease of $7.6 million related to our Hotel Dispositions.

~~Impairment Charges.~~ Impairment charges decreased $2.9 million, or 62.0%, to $1.8 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period, We recorded an impairment charge of $1.8 million in the 2017 period for damages to hotel properties from Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. We recorded an impairment charge of $4.7 million in the 2016 period comprised of an impairment charge of $5.0 million on the SpringHill Suites Gaithersburg, partially offset by an impairment credit of $344,000 related to a valuation adjustment on a previously impaired mezzanine loan.

~~Transaction Costs.~~ ~~Transaction costs were $11,000 in the 2017 period compared to $201,000 in the 2016 period.~~

~~Advisory Services Fee.~~ Advisory services fee increased $4.6 million, or 13.0%, to $39.5 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period, which represented fees paid in connection with the advisory agreement between Ashford Inc. and the Company. In the 2017 period, the advisory services fee was comprised of a base advisory fee of $25.9 million, equity-based compensation of $7.7 million associated with equity grants of our common stock and LTIP units awarded to the officers and employees of Ashford Inc. and reimbursable expenses of $5.8 million. In the 2016 period, the advisory services fee was comprised of a base advisory fee of $25.8 million, reimbursable expenses of $4.6 million and equity-based compensation of $4.5 million associated with equity grants of our common stock and LTIP units awarded to the officers and employees of Ashford Inc.

~~Corporate General and Administrative.~~ Corporate general and administrative expense increased $4.4 million, or 68.6%, to $10.8 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. The increase was primarily attributable to higher transaction, acquisition and management conversion costs of $3.0 million and higher public company costs, office expenses, professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses of $1.4 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period.

~~Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Entities.~~ We recorded equity in loss of unconsolidated entities of $3.6 million and $4.4 million in the 2017 and 2016 periods, respectively. The 2017 period included equity in loss of $3.3 million from Ashford Inc. and $341,000 from OpenKey, partially offset by equity in earnings of $52,000 from the AQUA U.S. Fund. The 2016 period included equity in loss of $3.3 million from the AQUA U.S. Fund, $959,000 from Ashford Inc. and $196,000 from OpenKey.

~~Interest Income.~~ ~~Interest income was $1.5 million and $229,000 in the 2017 and~~ ~~2016~~ ~~periods, respectively.~~

~~Gain (Loss) on Sale of Hotel Properties.~~ Gain on sale of hotel properties was $14.0 million and $24.4 million in the 2017 and 2016 periods, respectively. The gain in the 2017 period was related to a gain of $14.1 million on the sale of the Crowne Plaza Ravinia, slightly offset by losses related to the sale of Renaissance Portsmouth and Embassy Suites Syracuse. The gain in the 2016 period was primarily related to our Hotel Dispositions, slightly offset by a loss on the sale of a vacant lot associated with the Le Pavillon Hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana.

~~Other Income (Expense).~~ Other expense decreased $724,000, or 17.0%, to $3.5 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. In the 2017 period, we recognized realized losses of $4.2 million related to the termination of CMBX tranches, $543,000 on the maturities of options on futures contracts and $769,000 of CMBX premiums and usage fees. These expenses were partially offset by dividend income of $986,000, a realized gain of $822,000 on marketable securities and other miscellaneous

income of $131,000. In the 2016 period, we recognized realized losses of $3.3 million related to the termination of CMBX tranches, $156,000 related to the maturity of options on futures contracts, $150,000 from an investment write-off and $615,000 of CMBX premiums and usage fees.

~~Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Costs.~~ Interest expense and amortization of loan costs decreased $943,000, or 0.6%, to $167.2 million in the 2017 period compared to the 2016 period. The decrease is primarily due to lower interest expense and amortization of loan costs of $6.5 million from our Hotel Dispositions, partially offset by an increase of $5.6 million from higher interest expense and amortization of loan costs as a result of refinances and an increase in LIBOR rates. The average LIBOR rates in the 2017 period and the 2016 period were 1.04% and 0.45%, respectively.

~~Write-off of Premiums, Loan Costs and Exit Fees.~~ Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees decreased $3.3 million, or 66.8%, to $1.6 million in the 2017 period. In the 2017 period, we incurred write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees consisting of $1.5 million to refinance a mortgage loan secured by the Nashville Renaissance and Princeton Westin and other fees of $148,000. In the 2016 period, we incurred write-off of loan costs and exit fees of $4.9 million resulting from the write-off of unamortized loan costs of $570,000 and other exit fees of $4.3 million related to the sale of a five-hotel portfolio and the Hampton Inn Gainesville.

~~Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities.~~ Unrealized loss on marketable securities was $4.8 million in the 2017 period, which was based on changes in closing market prices during the period. There was no unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities in the 2016 period.

~~Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives.~~ Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives changed $6.1 million, or 142.5%, from a gain of $4.2 million in the 2016 period to a loss of $1.8 million in the 2017 period. In the 2017 period, we recognized unrealized losses of $3.6 million, $2.2 million and $613,000 associated with the remaining CMBX tranches, interest rate floors, and interest rate caps, respectively, partially offset by unrealized gains of $4.2 million associated with the reclassification to other income (expense) for the recognition of realized losses from CMBX tranche terminations and $427,000 associated with the reclassification to other income (expense) for maturities of options on futures contracts. In the 2016 period, we recorded an unrealized gain of $4.8 million related to interest rate floors, a $3.3 million unrealized gain associated with the reclassification to other income (expense) for the recognition of the realized loss from CMBX tranche terminations and a $156,000 unrealized gain associated with the reclassification to other income (expense) for the maturity of options on futures contracts, partially offset by unrealized losses of $3.2 million, $270,000 and $460,000 on the remaining CMBX tranches, options on futures contracts and interest rate derivatives, respectively. The fair value of interest rate floors and interest rate derivatives are primarily based on movements in the LIBOR forward curve and the passage of time. The fair value of options on futures contracts is determined based on the last reported settlement price as of the measurement date. The fair value of credit default swaps is based on the change in value of CMBX indices.

~~Income Tax (Expense) Benefit.~~ Income tax benefit (expense) changed $1.7 million, or 141.7% from expense of $1.2 million in the 2016 period to a benefit of $507,000 in the 2017 period. The change in income tax benefit (expense) is primarily due to a decrease in taxable income recognized by our TRS entities.

~~(Income) Loss from Consolidated Entities Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests.~~ ~~Our noncontrolling interest partner in consolidated entities was allocated income of $4,000 and loss $16,000 in the~~ ~~2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~ ~~periods, respectively.~~

~~Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership.~~ ~~Noncontrolling interests in operating partnership were allocated a net loss of $13.2 million and net income of $2.7 million in the~~ ~~2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~ ~~periods, respectively. Redeemable noncontrolling interests represented ownership interests of 15.73% and 14.01% in the operating partnership at~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016, respectively.~~

SEASONALITY

Our properties’ operations historically have been seasonal as certain properties maintain higher occupancy rates during the summer months, while certain other properties maintain higher occupancy rates during the winter months. This seasonality pattern can cause fluctuations in our quarterly lease revenue under our percentage leases. ~~We anticipate~~Quarterly revenue also may be adversely affected by renovations and repositionings, our managers’ effectiveness in generating business and by events beyond our control, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and government-issued travel restrictions in response, extreme weather conditions, natural disasters, terrorist attacks or alerts, civil unrest, government shutdowns, airline strikes or reduced airline capacity, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel. To the extent that ~~our~~ cash flows from ~~the~~ operations ~~of our properties and cash on hand will be sufficient~~are insufficient during any quarter to enable us to make quarterly distributions to maintain our REIT ~~status. To the extent that cash flows from operations and cash on hand are insufficient during any quarter~~status due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in lease revenue, we expect to utilize cash on hand or borrowings to fund required distributions. However, we cannot make any assurances that we will make distributions in the future.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the normal course of business, we form partnerships or joint ventures that operate certain ~~hotel properties.~~hotels. We evaluate each partnership and joint venture to determine whether the entity is a ~~Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”).~~VIE. If the entity is determined

to be a VIE, we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary and need to consolidate the entity. For further discussion of the ~~Company’s~~company’s VIEs, see ~~notes~~note 2 ~~and 5~~ to our consolidated financial statements.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

~~There have been~~Although there were no material changes, ~~since December 31, 2016,~~ outside of the ordinary course of business, as of March 31, 2020. to contractual obligations specified in the table of contractual obligations included in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our ~~2016 Form 10-K.~~2019 Form10-K, subsequent to March 31, 2020, we did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of our mortgage loans, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments - COVID-19, Management’s Plans and Liquidity” for additional information.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our accounting policies that are critical or most important to understanding our financial condition and results of operations and that require management to make the most difficult judgments are described in our ~~2016~~2019 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in these critical accounting policies.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The following non-GAAP presentations of EBITDA, EBITDAre, Adjusted ~~EBITDA,~~EBITDAre, Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted FFO ~~and AFFO~~ are ~~made~~presented to ~~assist~~help our investors evaluate our operating performance.

EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) ~~attributable to the Company~~ before interest expense and amortization of premiums and loan costs, net, ~~interest income other than interest income from mezzanine loans,~~ income taxes, depreciation and amortization, ~~and noncontrolling interests~~equity in ~~the operating partnership~~earnings/loss of unconsolidated entities and after ~~adjustments for~~the Company’s portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated ~~joint ventures.~~ entities. In addition, we exclude impairment charges on real estate, and gain/loss on sale of hotel properties of unconsolidated entities to calculate EBITDAre, as defined by NAREIT.

We then further adjust ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre to exclude certain additional items such as gain/loss on ~~sale of hotel properties, impairment charges and uninsured hurricane related costs,~~insurance settlements, write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees, other income/expense, net, transaction ~~acquisition and management~~ conversion costs, legal, ~~judgment~~advisory and ~~related legal~~settlement costs, dead deal costs, ~~software implementation costs,~~advisory services incentive fees and non-cash items such as amortization of unfavorable contract liabilities, non-cash stock/unit-based compensation, unrealized ~~gain/loss~~gains/losses on marketable securities and derivative instruments, ~~and investment in the AQUA U.S Fund,~~ as well as our portion of adjustments to ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre of unconsolidated entities. ~~We exclude items from Adjusted EBITDA that are either non-cash or are not part of our core operations in order to provide a period-over-period comparison of our operations.~~

We present EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre because we believe ~~these measurements a)~~they reflect more accurately ~~reflect~~ the ongoing performance of our hotel assets and other investments b)and provide more useful information to investors as they are indicators of our ability to meet our future debt payment ~~and~~requirements, working capital requirements and c)they provide an overall evaluation of our financial condition. EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre as calculated by us may not be comparable to EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre reported by other companies that do not define EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre exactly as we define the terms. EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre do not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to ~~a) GAAP~~operating income or net income ~~or loss~~determined in accordance with GAAP as an ~~indication~~indicator of ~~our financial~~ performance or ~~b) GAAP~~as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as ~~a measure~~determined by GAAP as an indicator of ~~our~~ liquidity.

The following table reconciles net income (loss) to EBITDA, EBITDAre and Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBITDAre (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Net income (loss) $ (28,726 ) $ (25,138 ) $ (50,235 ) $ (2,142 )
(Income) loss from consolidated entities attributable to noncontrolling interest (22 ) (16 ) (4 ) 16
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership 6,940
5,009
13,202
2,745
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company (21,808 ) (20,145 ) (37,037 ) 619
Interest income (706 ) (92 ) (1,460 ) (229 )
Interest expense and amortization of premiums and loan costs, net 56,934
55,732
167,138
168,078
Depreciation and amortization 60,075
60,108
185,197
182,227
Income tax expense (benefit) (1,271 ) (16 ) (515 ) 1,216
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership (6,940 ) (5,009 ) (13,202 ) (2,745 )
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities 679
85
3,632
959
Company's portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.) (384 ) 165
(20 ) (207 )
Company's portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey) (113 ) —
(361 ) —
EBITDA available to the Company and OP unitholders 86,466
90,828
303,372
349,918
Amortization of unfavorable contract liabilities (363 ) (543 ) (1,151 ) (1,629 )
Impairment and uninsured hurricane losses 5,496
4,922
5,496
4,695
(Gain) loss on sale of hotel properties (15 ) (1,448 ) (14,024 ) (24,428 )
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees —
972
1,629
4,913
Other (income) expense 273
926
3,539
4,263
Transaction, acquisition and management conversion costs 202
778
3,770
1,422
Legal judgment and related legal costs 27
23
4,091
71
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities 936
—
4,813
—
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives 1,479
9,548
1,804
(4,248 )
Dead deal costs 5
30
9
331
Software implementation costs —
—
1,034
—
Non-cash stock/unit-based compensation 4,613
2,185
8,751
5,511
Company's portion of (gain) loss of AQUA U.S. Fund —
475
(52 ) 3,473
Company's portion of adjustments to EBITDA of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.) 1,703
793
3,752
2,929
Company's portion of adjustments to EBITDA of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey) 2
—
4
—
Adjusted EBITDA available to the Company and OP unitholders $ 100,824
$ 109,489
$ 326,837
$ 347,221



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Net income (loss)	$	(101,920	)	$	(46,622	)
Interest expense and amortization of premiums and loan costs, net	57,085			66,166
Depreciation and amortization	66,350			67,178
Income tax expense (benefit)	303			(405		)
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities	79			1,063
Company’s portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.)	—			1,874
Company’s portion of EBITDA of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey)	(78		)	(115		)
EBITDA	21,819			89,139
Impairment charges on real estate	27,613			—
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and hotel properties	(3,623		)	(233		)
EBITDAre	45,809			88,906
Amortization of unfavorable contract liabilities	49			(39		)
(Gain) loss on insurance settlements	—			(36		)
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees	95			2,062
Other (income) expense, net	(1,491		)	362
Transaction, acquisition and management conversion costs	741			446
Legal judgment and related legal costs	145			417
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities	1,477			(808		)
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives	(4,422		)	2,994
Dead deal costs	101			32
Non-cash stock/unit-based compensation	4,906			4,590
Advisory services incentive fee	—			636
Company’s portion of adjustments to EBITDAre of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.)	—			913
Company’s portion of adjustments to EBITDAre of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey)	6			21
Adjusted EBITDAre	$	47,416		$	100,496

We calculate FFO and ~~AFFO~~Adjusted FFO in the following table. FFO is calculated on the basis defined by NAREIT, which is net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses on ~~properties,~~sale of assets and ~~extraordinary items as defined by GAAP,~~hotel properties, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, impairment charges on real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated entities and noncontrolling interests in the operating partnership. Adjustments for unconsolidated entities are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. NAREIT developed FFO as a relative measure of performance of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined by GAAP. Our calculation of ~~AFFO~~Adjusted FFO excludes write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees, ~~other impairment charges,~~gain/loss on insurance settlements, other income/expense, net transaction ~~acquisition~~ and ~~management~~ conversion costs, legal, ~~judgment~~advisory, and ~~related legal~~settlement costs, dead deal costs, ~~software implementation costs, uninsured hurricane related costs~~advisory service incentive fees and non-cash items such as non-cash stock/unit-based compensation, amortization of loan costs, unrealized ~~gain/loss~~gains/losses on marketable securities and derivative instruments, ~~and investment in the AQUA U.S Fund,~~ as well as our portion of adjustments to FFO related to unconsolidated entities. We exclude items from ~~AFFO~~Adjusted FFO that are either non-cash or are not part of our core operations in order to provide a period-over-period comparison of our operating results. We consider FFO and ~~AFFO~~Adjusted FFO to be appropriate measures of our ongoing normalized operating performance as a REIT. We compute FFO in accordance with our interpretation of standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that either do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or interpret the NAREIT definition differently than us. FFO and ~~AFFO~~Adjusted FFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to a) GAAP net income or loss as an indication of our financial performance or b) GAAP cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to satisfy our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. However, to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical operating results, we believe that FFO and ~~AFFO~~Adjusted FFO should be considered along with our net income or loss and cash flows reported in the consolidated financial statements.

The following table reconciles net income (loss) to FFO and Adjusted FFO (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2020			2019
Net income (loss)	$	(28,726	)	$	(25,138	)	$	(50,235	)	$	(2,142	)	$	(101,920	)	$	(46,622	)
(Income) loss from consolidated entities attributable to noncontrolling interest	(22		)	(16		)	(4		)	16
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities													48			26
Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	6,940			5,009			13,202			2,745			17,671			8,579
Preferred dividends	(11,440		)	(8,875		)	(33,352		)	(25,856		)	(10,644		)	(10,644		)
Extinguishment of issuance costs upon redemption of preferred stock	(4,507		)	(6,124		)	(4,507		)	(6,124		)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	(37,755		)	(35,144		)	(74,896		)	(31,361		)	(94,845		)	(48,661		)
Depreciation and amortization of real estate	60,075			60,108			185,197			182,227			66,298			67,121
(Gain) loss on sale of hotel properties	(15		)	(1,448		)	(14,024		)	(24,428		)
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and hotel properties													(3,623		)	(233		)
Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership	(6,940		)	(5,009		)	(13,202		)	(2,745		)	(17,671		)	(8,579		)
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities	679			85			3,632			959			79			1,063
Impairment charges on real estate	1,785			5,039			1,785			5,039			27,613			—
Company's portion of FFO of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.)	(570		)	(85		)	(3,265		)	(597		)
Company's portion of FFO of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey)	(116		)	—			(366		)	—
Company’s portion of FFO of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.)													—			(635		)
Company’s portion of FFO of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey)													(79		)	(100		)
FFO available to common stockholders and OP unitholders	17,143			23,546			84,861			129,094			(22,228		)	9,976
Extinguishment of issuance costs upon redemption of preferred stock	4,507			6,124			4,507			6,124
Write-off of premiums, loan costs and exit fees	—			972			1,629			4,913			95			2,062
Other impairment charges	—			(117		)	—			(344		)
Uninsured hurricane related costs	3,711			—			3,711			—
(Gain) loss on insurance settlements													—			(36		)
Other (income) expense	273			926			3,539			4,263			(1,491		)	362
Transaction, acquisition and management conversion costs	202			778			3,770			1,422			741			446
Legal judgment and related legal costs	27			23			4,091			71			145			417
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities	936			—			4,813			—			1,477			(808		)
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives	1,479			9,548			1,804			(4,248		)	(4,422		)	2,994
Dead deal costs	5			30			9			331			101			32
Software implementation costs	—			—			1,034			—
Non-cash stock/unit-based compensation	4,613			2,185			8,751			5,511			4,906			4,590
Company's portion of (gain) loss of AQUA U.S. Fund	—			475			(52		)	3,473
Company's portion of adjustments to FFO of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.)	1,580			793			6,130			2,929
Company's portion of adjustments to FFO of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey)	2			—			4			—
Amortization of loan costs													6,580			7,256
Advisory services incentive fee													—			636
Company’s portion of adjustments to FFO of unconsolidated entities (Ashford Inc.)													—			2,441
Company’s portion of adjustments to FFO of unconsolidated entities (OpenKey)													6			22
Adjusted FFO available to common stockholders and OP unitholders	$	34,478		$	45,283		$	128,601		$	153,539		$	(14,090	)	$	30,390

HOTEL PORTFOLIO

The following table presents certain information related to our hotel properties as of ~~September 30, 2017:~~March 31, 2020:


Hotel Property	Location	Service Type	Total Rooms	% Owned		Owned Rooms	Location	Service Type	Total Rooms	% Owned	Owned Rooms
Fee Simple Properties
Embassy Suites	Austin, TX	Full service	150	100	%	150	Austin, TX	Full service	150	100	150
Embassy Suites	Dallas, TX	Full service	150	100		150	Dallas, TX	Full service	150	100	150
Embassy Suites	Herndon, VA	Full service	150	100		150	Herndon, VA	Full service	150	100	150
Embassy Suites	Las Vegas, NV	Full service	220	100		220	Las Vegas, NV	Full service	220	100	220
Embassy Suites	Flagstaff, AZ	Full service	119	100		119	Flagstaff, AZ	Full service	119	100	119
Embassy Suites	Houston, TX	Full service	150	100		150	Houston, TX	Full service	150	100	150
Embassy Suites	West Palm Beach, FL	Full service	160	100		160	West Palm Beach, FL	Full service	160	100	160
Embassy Suites	Philadelphia, PA	Full service	263	100		263	Philadelphia, PA	Full service	263	100	263
Embassy Suites	Walnut Creek, CA	Full service	249	100		249	Walnut Creek, CA	Full service	249	100	249
Embassy Suites	Arlington, VA	Full service	267	100		267	Arlington, VA	Full service	269	100	269
Embassy Suites	Portland, OR	Full service	276	100		276	Portland, OR	Full service	276	100	276
Embassy Suites	Santa Clara, CA	Full service	257	100		257	Santa Clara, CA	Full service	258	100	258
Embassy Suites	Orlando, FL	Full service	174	100		174	Orlando, FL	Full service	174	100	174
Embassy Suites							New York, NY	Full service	310	100	310
Hilton Garden Inn	Jacksonville, FL	Select service	119	100		119	Jacksonville, FL	Select service	119	100	119
Hilton Garden Inn	Austin, TX	Select service	254	100		254	Austin, TX	Select service	254	100	254
Hilton Garden Inn	Baltimore, MD	Select service	158	100		158	Baltimore, MD	Select service	158	100	158
Hilton Garden Inn	Virginia Beach, VA	Select service	176	100		176	Virginia Beach, VA	Select service	176	100	176
Hilton Garden Inn	Wisconsin Dells, WI	Select service	128	100		128
Hilton							Houston, TX	Full service	242	100	242
Hilton							St. Petersburg, FL	Full service	333	100	333
Hilton	Houston, TX	Full service	242	100		242	Santa Fe, NM	Full service	158	100	158
Hilton	St. Petersburg, FL	Full service	333	100		333	Bloomington, MN	Full service	300	100	300
Hilton	Santa Fe, NM	Full service	158	100		158	Costa Mesa, CA	Full service	486	100	486
Hilton	Bloomington, MN	Full service	300	100		300	Boston, MA	Full service	390	100	390
Hilton	Costa Mesa, CA	Full service	486	100		486	Parsippany, NJ	Full service	353	100	353
Hilton	Boston, MA	Full service	390	100		390	Tampa, FL	Full service	238	100	238
Hilton	Parsippany, NJ	Full service	353	100		353	Alexandria, VA	Full service	252	100	252
Hilton	Tampa, FL	Full service	238	100		238	Santa Cruz, CA	Full service	178	100	178
Hampton Inn	Lawrenceville, GA	Select service	85	100		85	Lawrenceville, GA	Select service	85	100	85
Hampton Inn	Evansville, IN	Select service	140	100		140	Evansville, IN	Select service	140	100	140
Hampton Inn	Parsippany, NJ	Select service	152	100		152	Parsippany, NJ	Select service	152	100	152
Hampton Inn	Buford, GA	Select service	92	100		92	Buford, GA	Select service	92	100	92
Hampton Inn	Phoenix, AZ	Select service	106	100		106	Phoenix, AZ	Select service	106	100	106
Hampton Inn - Waterfront	Pittsburgh, PA	Select service	113	100		113	Pittsburgh, PA	Select service	113	100	113
Hampton Inn - Washington	Pittsburgh, PA	Select service	103	100		103	Pittsburgh, PA	Select service	103	100	103
Hampton Inn	Columbus, OH	Select service	145	100		145	Columbus, OH	Select service	145	100	145
Marriott	Beverly Hills, CA	Full service	260	100		260	Beverly Hills, CA	Full service	260	100	260
Marriott	Durham, NC	Full service	225	100		225	Durham, NC	Full service	225	100	225
Marriott	Arlington, VA	Full service	698	100		698	Arlington, VA	Full service	701	100	701
Marriott	Bridgewater, NJ	Full service	347	100		347	Bridgewater, NJ	Full service	347	100	347
Marriott	Dallas, TX	Full service	265	100		265	Dallas, TX	Full service	265	100	265
Marriott	Fremont, CA	Full service	357	100		357	Fremont, CA	Full service	357	100	357
Marriott	Memphis, TN	Full service	232	100		232	Memphis, TN	Full service	232	100	232
Marriott	Irving, TX	Full service	491	100		491	Irving, TX	Full service	491	100	491
Marriott	Omaha, NE	Full service	300	100		300	Omaha, NE	Full service	300	100	300
Marriott	San Antonio, TX	Full service	251	100		251


Hotel Property	Location	Service Type	Total Rooms	% Owned	Owned Rooms	Location	Service Type	Total Rooms	% Owned	Owned Rooms
Marriott	Sugarland, TX	Full service	300	100	300	Sugarland, TX	Full service	300	100	300
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Jacksonville, FL	Select service	102	100	102	Baltimore, MD	Select service	133	100	133
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Baltimore, MD	Select service	133	100	133	Kennesaw, GA	Select service	90	100	90
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Kennesaw, GA	Select service	90	100	90	Buford, GA	Select service	97	100	97
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Buford, GA	Select service	97	100	97	Charlotte, NC	Select service	136	100	136
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Centreville, VA	Select service	136	100	136	Durham, NC	Select service	120	100	120
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Charlotte, NC	Select service	136	100	136	Manhattan Beach, CA	Select service	164	100	164
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Durham, NC	Select service	120	100	120	Plymouth Meeting, PA	Select service	199	100	199
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Manhattan Beach, CA	Select service	164	100	164
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Plymouth Meeting, PA	Select service	199	100	199
SpringHill Suites by Marriott	Glen Allen, VA	Select service	136	100	136
Fairfield Inn by Marriott	Kennesaw, GA	Select service	86	100	86	Kennesaw, GA	Select service	86	100	86
Courtyard by Marriott	Bloomington, IN	Select service	117	100	117	Bloomington, IN	Select service	117	100	117
Courtyard by Marriott - Tremont	Boston, MA	Select service	315	100	315	Boston, MA	Select service	315	100	315
Courtyard by Marriott	Columbus, IN	Select service	90	100	90
Courtyard by Marriott	Denver, CO	Select service	202	100	202	Columbus, IN	Select service	90	100	90
Courtyard by Marriott	Louisville, KY	Select service	150	100	150	Denver, CO	Select service	202	100	202
Courtyard by Marriott	Gaithersburg, MD	Select service	210	100	210	Louisville, KY	Select service	150	100	150
Courtyard by Marriott	Crystal City, VA	Select service	272	100	272	Gaithersburg, MD	Select service	210	100	210
Courtyard by Marriott	Ft. Lauderdale, FL	Select service	174	100	174	Crystal City, VA	Select service	272	100	272
Courtyard by Marriott	Overland Park, KS	Select service	168	100	168	Ft. Lauderdale, FL	Select service	174	100	174
Courtyard by Marriott	Savannah, GA	Select service	156	100	156	Overland Park, KS	Select service	168	100	168
Courtyard by Marriott	Foothill Ranch, CA	Select service	156	100	156	Foothill Ranch, CA	Select service	156	100	156
Courtyard by Marriott	Alpharetta, GA	Select service	154	100	154	Alpharetta, GA	Select service	154	100	154
Courtyard by Marriott	Oakland, CA	Select service	156	100	156	Oakland, CA	Select service	156	100	156
Courtyard by Marriott	Scottsdale, AZ	Select service	180	100	180	Scottsdale, AZ	Select service	180	100	180
Courtyard by Marriott	Plano, TX	Select service	153	100	153	Plano, TX	Select service	153	100	153
Courtyard by Marriott	Newark, CA	Select service	181	100	181	Newark, CA	Select service	181	100	181
Courtyard by Marriott	Manchester, CT	Select service	90	85	77	Manchester, CT	Select service	90	85	77
Courtyard by Marriott	Basking Ridge, NJ	Select service	235	100	235	Basking Ridge, NJ	Select service	235	100	235
Courtyard by Marriott	Wichita, KS	Select service	128	100	128	Wichita, KS	Select service	128	100	128
Courtyard by Marriott - Billerica	Boston, MA	Select service	210	100	210	Boston, MA	Select service	210	100	210
Homewood Suites	Pittsburgh, PA	Select service	148	100	148	Pittsburgh, PA	Select service	148	100	148
Marriott Residence Inn	Lake Buena Vista, FL	Select service	210	100	210	Lake Buena Vista, FL	Select service	210	100	210
Marriott Residence Inn	Evansville, IN	Select service	78	100	78	Evansville, IN	Select service	78	100	78
Marriott Residence Inn	Orlando, FL	Select service	350	100	350	Orlando, FL	Select service	350	100	350
Marriott Residence Inn	Falls Church, VA	Select service	159	100	159	Falls Church, VA	Select service	159	100	159
Marriott Residence Inn	San Diego, CA	Select service	150	100	150	San Diego, CA	Select service	150	100	150
Marriott Residence Inn	Salt Lake City, UT	Select service	144	100	144	Salt Lake City, UT	Select service	144	100	144
Marriott Residence Inn	Las Vegas, NV	Select service	256	100	256	Las Vegas, NV	Select service	256	100	256
Marriott Residence Inn	Phoenix, AZ	Select service	200	100	200	Phoenix, AZ	Select service	200	100	200
Marriott Residence Inn	Plano, TX	Select service	126	100	126	Plano, TX	Select service	126	100	126
Marriott Residence Inn	Newark, CA	Select service	168	100	168	Newark, CA	Select service	168	100	168
Marriott Residence Inn	Manchester, CT	Select service	96	85	82	Manchester, CT	Select service	96	85	82
Marriott Residence Inn	Jacksonville, FL	Select service	120	100	120	Jacksonville, FL	Select service	120	100	120
Marriott Residence Inn	Stillwater, OK	Select service	101	100	101	Stillwater, OK	Select service	101	100	101
Marriott Residence Inn	Tampa, FL	Select service	109	100	109
TownePlace Suites by Marriott	Manhattan Beach, CA	Select service	143	100	143	Manhattan Beach, CA	Select service	143	100	143
One Ocean	Atlantic Beach, FL	Full service	193	100	193	Atlantic Beach, FL	Full service	193	100	193
Sheraton Hotel						Ann Arbor, MI	Full service	197	100	197
Sheraton Hotel						Langhorne, PA	Full service	186	100	186
Sheraton Hotel						Minneapolis, MN	Full service	220	100	220
Sheraton Hotel						Indianapolis, IN	Full service	378	100	378
Sheraton Hotel						Anchorage, AK	Full service	370	100	370


Hotel Property	Location	Service Type	Total Rooms	% Owned	Owned Rooms	Location	Service Type	Total Rooms	% Owned	Owned Rooms
Sheraton Hotel	Ann Arbor, MI	Full service	197	100	197
Sheraton Hotel	Langhorne, PA	Full service	186	100	186
Sheraton Hotel	Minneapolis, MN	Full service	220	100	220
Sheraton Hotel	Indianapolis, IN	Full service	378	100	378
Sheraton Hotel	Anchorage, AK	Full service	370	100	370
Sheraton Hotel	San Diego, CA	Full service	260	100	260	San Diego, CA	Full service	260	100	260
Hyatt Regency	Coral Gables, FL	Full service	253	100	253	Coral Gables, FL	Full service	254	100	254
Hyatt Regency	Hauppauge, NY	Full service	358	100	358	Hauppauge, NY	Full service	358	100	358
Hyatt Regency	Savannah, GA	Full service	351	100	351	Savannah, GA	Full service	351	100	351
Renaissance	Nashville, TN	Full service	673	100	673	Nashville, TN	Full service	673	100	673
Annapolis Historic Inn	Annapolis, MD	Full service	124	100	124	Annapolis, MD	Full service	124	100	124
Lakeway Resort & Spa	Austin, TX	Full service	168	100	168	Austin, TX	Full service	168	100	168
Silversmith	Chicago, IL	Full service	144	100	144	Chicago, IL	Full service	144	100	144
The Churchill	Washington, DC	Full service	173	100	173	Washington, D.C.	Full service	173	100	173
The Melrose	Washington, DC	Full service	240	100	240	Washington, D.C.	Full service	240	100	240
Le Pavillon	New Orleans, LA	Full service	226	100	226	New Orleans, LA	Full service	226	100	226
The Ashton	Ft. Worth, TX	Full service	39	100	39	Ft. Worth, TX	Full service	39	100	39
Westin	Princeton, NJ	Full service	296	100	296	Princeton, NJ	Full service	296	100	296
W	Atlanta, GA	Full service	237	100	237	Atlanta, GA	Full service	237	100	237
W	Minneapolis, MN	Full service	229	100	229	Minneapolis, MN	Full service	229	100	229
Le Meridien	Minneapolis, MN	Full service	60	100	60	Minneapolis, MN	Full service	60	100	60
Hotel Indigo	Atlanta, GA	Full service	140	100	140	Atlanta, GA	Full service	141	100	141
Ritz-Carlton						Atlanta, GA	Full service	444	100	444
La Posada de Santa Fe						Santa Fe, NM	Full service	157	100	157
Ground Lease Properties
Crowne Plaza	Key West, FL	Full service	160	100	160
Crowne Plaza	Annapolis, MD	Full service	196	100	196
Hilton	Ft. Worth, TX	Full service	294	100	294
Renaissance	Palm Springs, CA	Full service	410	100	410
Ritz-Carlton	Atlanta, GA	Full service	444	100	444
Crowne Plaza ^{(1) (2)}						Key West, FL	Full service	160	100	160
Hilton ⁽³⁾						Ft. Worth, TX	Full service	294	100	294
Renaissance ⁽⁴⁾						Palm Springs, CA	Full service	410	100	410
Total			25,055		25,028			24,746		24,719

________


⁽¹⁾	The ground lease expires in 2084.


⁽²⁾	The Company entered into a new franchise agreement with Marriott to convert the Crowne Plaza La Concha Key West Hotel in Key West, Florida to an Autograph Collection property. The agreement with Marriott calls for the Hotel to be converted to an Autograph property by July 1, 2022.


⁽³⁾	The ground lease expires in 2040.


⁽⁴⁾	The ground lease expires in 2059 with one 25-year extension option.


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our primary market risk exposure consists of changes in interest rates on borrowings under our debt instruments. The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates.

At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, our total indebtedness of ~~$3.7~~$4.1 billion included ~~$3.3~~$3.8 billion of variable-rate debt. The impact on our results of operations of a 25-basis point change in interest rate on the outstanding balance of variable-rate debt at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 would be approximately ~~$8.1~~$9.4 million annually. Interest rate changes have no impact on the remaining ~~$449.7~~$359.1 million of fixed-rate debt.

The above amounts were determined based on the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowings and assume no changes in our capital structure. As the information presented above includes only those exposures that existed at ~~September 30, 2017 and December~~March 31, ~~2016, respectively,~~2020, it does not consider exposures or positions that could arise after that date. Accordingly, the information presented herein has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on exposures that arise during the period, the hedging strategies at the time, and the related interest rates.

We use credit default swaps, tied to the CMBX index, to hedge financial and capital market risk. We have entered into credit default swap transactions, excluding those that have terminated, for notional amounts totaling $212.5 million, to hedge financial and capital market risk. A credit default swap is a derivative contract that functions like an insurance policy against the credit risk of an entity or obligation. The seller of protection assumes the credit risk of the reference obligation from the buyer (us) of protection in exchange for annual premium payments. If a default or a loss, as defined in the credit default swap agreements, occurs on the underlying bonds, then the buyer of protection is protected against those losses. The only liability for us, the buyer, is the annual premium and any change in value of the underlying CMBX index (if the trade is terminated prior to maturity). For all CMBX trades completed to date, we were the buyer of protection. Credit default swaps are subject to master-netting settlement arrangements and credit support annexes. Assuming the underlying bonds pay off at par over their remaining average life, our total exposure for these trades was approximately ~~$8.4~~$6.8 million at ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2020.

We hold interest rate floors with notional amounts totaling ~~$10.0~~$6.0 billion and strike rates ranging from (0.25)% to 1%1.25%. Our total exposure is capped at our initial upfront costs totaling ~~$9.5~~$9.4 million. These instruments have termination dates ranging from ~~March 2019~~April 2020 to ~~July 2020.~~November 2021.


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”))~~ as of ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~(“Evaluation~~March 31, 2020 (the “Evaluation Date”)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures ~~are~~were effective (i) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and (ii) to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On June 29, 2017, RLI filed suit in Federal District Court in Dallas seeking to recover the amounts previously paid to Nantucket. On July 19, 2017, the Company paid approximately $10.0 million to RLI mooting RLI's claim subject only to the alleged claim for attorneys fee. With the agreement for the Company to pay the negotiated settlement of RLI's attorney fees in the amount of ~~$100,000,~~potential remaining legal fees that could be owed.

We are engaged in other various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully adjudicated. The likelihood of loss from these legal proceedings, based on definitions within contingency accounting literature, ranges from remote to reasonably possible and to probable. Based on estimates of the range of potential losses associated with these matters, management does not believe the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, or results of ~~operations.~~operations or cash flows. However, the final results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and if we fail to prevail in one or more of these legal matters, and the associated realized losses exceed our current estimates of the range of potential losses, our consolidated financial position or results of operations could be materially adversely affected in future periods.


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as supplemented by our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2020, which describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business,

financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies, or prospects in a material and adverse manner. ~~At September 30, 2017, there have been no material changes to~~The risk factors set forth below update, and should be read together with, the risk factors ~~set forth~~described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019, as supplemented by our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2020.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has and will continue to significantly reduce our occupancy rates and RevPAR.

Our business has been and will continue to be materially adversely affected by the impact of, and the public concern about, a pandemic disease. In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China, which subsequently spread to other regions of the world, and has resulted in increased travel restrictions and extended shutdown of certain businesses, including in every state in the United States. Since late February, we have experienced a significant decline in occupancy and RevPAR and we expect the significant occupancy and RevPAR reduction associated with the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) to continue as we are recording significant reservation cancellations as well as a significant reduction in new reservations relative to prior expectations. The continued outbreak of the virus in the U.S. has and will continue to further reduce travel and demand at our hotels. The prolonged occurrence of the virus has resulted in health or other government authorities imposing widespread restrictions on travel or other market impacts. The hotel industry and our portfolio have and we expect will continue to experience the postponement or cancellation of a significant number of business conferences and similar events. At this time those restrictions are very fluid and evolving. We have been and will continue to be negatively impacted by those restrictions. Given that the type, degree and length of such restrictions are not known at this time, we cannot predict the overall impact of such restrictions on us or the overall economic environment. In addition, even after the restrictions are lifted, the propensity of people to travel and for businesses to hold conferences will likely remain below historical levels for an additional period of time that is difficult to predict. We may also face increased risk of litigation if we have guests or employees who become ill due to COVID-19.

As such, the impact these restrictions may have on our financial position, operating results and liquidity cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, but the impact will likely be material. Additionally, the public perception of a risk of a pandemic or media coverage of these diseases, or public perception of health risks linked to perceived regional food and beverage safety has materially adversely affected us by reducing demand for our hotels. Currently, no vaccines have been developed, and there can be no assurance that an effective vaccine will be developed soon, or ever. These events have resulted in a sustained, significant drop in demand for our hotels and could have a material adverse effect on us.

We have defaulted on our property level secured debt and if we are unable to negotiate forbearance agreements, the lenders may foreclose on our hotels.

Nearly all of the Company’s properties are pledged as collateral for a variety of loans. On or about March 17, 2020, we sent notice to all of our lenders notifying such lenders that the spread of the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was having a significant negative impact on the travel and hospitality industry and that our hotels were experiencing a severe decrease in revenue, resulting in a negative impact on cash flow. While our loan agreements do not contain forbearance rights, we requested a modification to the terms of the loans. Specifically, we requested that for a period of time, shortfalls in debt service payments accrue without penalty and all extension options be deemed granted notwithstanding the existence of any debt service payment accruals. Beginning on April 1, 2020, we did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of our loans, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan documents. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable loan documents, such an Event of Default caused an automatic increase in the interest rate on our outstanding loan balance for the period such Event of Default remains outstanding. Following an Event of Default, our lenders can generally elect to accelerate all principal and accrued interest payments that remain outstanding under the applicable loan agreement and foreclose on the applicable hotel properties that are security for such loans. The lenders who hold the notes secured by the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square and Hilton Scotts Valley hotel in Santa Cruz, California have each sent us an acceleration notice which accelerated all payments due under the applicable loan documents. The Company is in the process of negotiating forbearance agreements with its lenders. At this time, we cannot predict the likelihood that these forbearance agreement discussions will be successful. If we are unsuccessful in negotiating these forbearance agreements, the lenders could potentially foreclose on our hotels. In addition, the senior lenders and mezzanine lenders who hold notes secured by the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square are parties to a guaranty with a third party, which guaranty the lenders can call upon to make payment of up to $20 million on the notes now that the mortgage loan has been accelerated. The principal and accrued interest amount of the notes currently held by the senior lenders, senior mezzanine lenders and junior mezzanine lenders is approximately $108.75 million, $26.25 million and $10 million, respectively. If the lenders call upon the guaranty, and the third party guarantor makes payments under the guaranty, the guarantor has the right to require us to reimburse them for the amount paid under the guaranty. If we do not reimburse the guarantor, the guarantor will have the option to purchase the equity in the entity which owns the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square hotel for $1. If the guarantor exercises this call option, we will no

longer own the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square. A foreclosure or exercise of the call option may also result in reputational risks with lenders that could make it more difficult, or more costly, to obtain loans in the future.

Any such Event of Default, acceleration of payments, or foreclosure of our assets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and ability to continue to operate or make distributions to our stockholders in the future. An Event of Default could significantly limit our financing alternatives, which could cause us to curtail our investment activities and/or dispose of assets. It is also possible that we could become involved in litigation related to matters concerning the defaulted loans, and such litigation could result in significant costs to us.

In addition to losing the applicable properties, a foreclosure may result in recognition of taxable income. Under the Code, a foreclosure of property securing non-recourse debt would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure even though we did not receive any cash proceeds. As a result, we may be required to identify and utilize other sources of cash for distributions to our stockholders.

As a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our financial statements contain a statement regarding a substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that we will continue to operate in the normal course of business. As a result of the factors described below under “The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has and will continue to significantly impact our occupancy rates and RevPAR,” our notes to our financial statements include a qualification as to a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months. As a result of the continued suspension of operations at many of our hotels and the severe decline in revenues resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning on April 1, 2020, we did not make principal or interest payments under nearly all of our loan agreements, which constituted an “Event of Default” as such term is defined under the applicable loan agreement. Additionally, the lenders who hold the notes that are secured by the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square and Hilton Scotts Valley hotel in Santa Cruz, California have each sent us an acceleration notice, which accelerated all payments due under the applicable loan documents. At this time, we are currently in the process of negotiating forbearance agreements with our lenders. Any forbearance agreement may lead to increased costs, increased interest rates, additional restrictive covenants and other lender protections and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in modifying such terms. If we are unsuccessful in negotiating forbearance agreements with our lenders, this could lead to the potential acceleration of amounts due under our loan agreements, which would adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity. The foregoing raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may negatively affect the price of our preferred or common stock and may make it challenging for us to issue additional debt on favorable terms to the extent necessary or desirable to increase our liquidity.

We do not have any employees, and rely on our hotel managers to employ the personnel required to operate the hotels we own. As a result, we have less ability in the COVID-19 environment to reduce staffing at our hotels than we would if we employed such personnel directly.

We do not have any employees. We contractually engage hotel managers, such as Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt and our affiliate, Remington Hotels, which is owned by Ashford Inc., to operate, and to employ the personnel required to operate, our hotels. The hotel manager is required under the applicable hotel management agreement to determine appropriate staffing levels; we are required to reimburse the applicable hotel manager for the cost of these employees. As a result, we are dependent and our hotel managers to make appropriate staffing decisions and to appropriately reduce staffing when market conditions are poor, and have less ability in the COVID-19 environment to reduce staffing at our hotels than we would if we employed such personnel directly. As a result, our hotels may be staffed at a level higher than we would choose if we employed the personnel required to operate the hotels. In addition, we may be less likely to take aggressive actions (such as delaying payments owed to our hotel managers) in order to influence the staffing decisions made by Remington Hotels, which is our affiliate.

We may not pay dividends on our preferred stock in the future.

We may not continue to pay dividends on our preferred stock in the future, particularly in light of the downturn in our business occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic and the demands of our property-level lenders, with whom we are currently negotiating forbearance agreements in light of our failure to make interest and principal payments starting in April 2020. Our board of directors decides each quarter whether to pay dividends on our preferred stock, based on a variety of factors

deemed relevant by our directors, including the current business environment, overall funding levels, other contractual obligations and expected future business conditions. If we fail to pay dividends on our preferred stock, the market price of our preferred stock will likely be adversely affected and we will (absent paying all accrued, unpaid dividends by December 31, 2020) no longer be eligible to use the abbreviated and less costly Form S-3 registration statement to register our securities for sale, which would complicate our efforts to raise funds in the future.

We may become no longer eligible to use Form S-3, which would impair our capital raising activities.

We may become no longer eligible to use Form S-3 as a result of our recent payment defaults under our mortgage loans with our property level lenders, which occurred beginning on April 1, 2020. If such defaults are not cured by December 31, 2020, we will not be able to use our currently effective Form S-3 to register sales of our securities. In addition, we are currently restricted from filing new shelf registration statements on Form S-3 or filing a post-effective amendment to an existing Form S-3 as a result of our payment defaults. We have relied on shelf registration statements on Form S-3 for our financings in recent years, and accordingly any such limitations may harm our ability to raise the capital we need. Under these circumstances, if we become ineligible to use our existing Form S-3 again, we will be required to use a registration statement on Form S-1 to register securities with the SEC, which would hinder our ability to act quickly in raising capital to take advantage of market conditions in our capital raising activities and would increase our cost of raising capital.

If we cannot meet the continued listing requirements of the NYSE, the NYSE may delist our common stock.

On April 17, 2020, we received written notification from the NYSE that the average closing price of our common stock over the prior 30 consecutive trading-day period was below $1.00 per share, which is the minimum average closing price per share required to maintain listing on the NYSE under Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. We informed the NYSE that we intend to cure the deficiency and to return to compliance with the NYSE continued listing requirements, which they acknowledged. We can regain compliance at any time during the cure period following receipt of the notification if our common stock has a closing share price of at least $1.00 on the last trading day of any calendar month during the cure period and also has an average closing share price of at least $1.00 over the 30-trading day period ending on the last trading day of that month. In addition, on April 23, 2020, we received notification from the NYSE that, as a result of a temporary relief order in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, ongoing cure periods for listed companies would be tolled until June 30, 2020. As a result, the effective end date of the cure period applicable to us will be December 26, 2020. The Company’s current intention is to cure the deficiency by implementing a reverse stock split of its common stock. While we may consider various other options to cure the deficiency, it may take significant effort to regain compliance with this continued listing standard, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful.

Our common stock could also be delisted if (i) our average market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less than $15 million, or (ii) our common stock trades at an “abnormally low” price. In either case, our common stock would be suspended from trading on the NYSE immediately, and the NYSE would begin the process to delist our common stock, subject to our right to appeal under NYSE rules. If this were to occur, there is no assurance that any appeal we undertake in these or other circumstances would be successful, nor is there any assurance that we will continue to comply with the other NYSE continued listing standards.

Failure to maintain our NYSE listing could negatively impact us and our stockholders by reducing the willingness of investors to hold our common stock because of the resulting decreased price, liquidity and trading volume of our common stock, limited availability of price quotations, and reduced news and analyst coverage. These developments may also require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and may limit our ability to raise capital by issuing additional shares in the future. Delisting may adversely impact the perception of our financial condition and cause reputational harm with investors and parties conducting business with us. In addition, the perceived decreased value of equity incentive awards may reduce their effectiveness in encouraging executive performance and retention.

In light of the downturn of our business and Ashford Inc.’s business occasioned by COVID-19, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the Enhanced Return Funding Program.

On June 26, 2018, we entered into the Enhanced Return Funding Program Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement (the “ERFP Agreement”) with Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC, which generally provides that Ashford LLC will provide funding to facilitate the acquisition of properties by us that are recommended by Ashford LLC, in an aggregate amount of up to $50 million (subject to increase to up to $100 million by mutual agreement). In light of the downturn of our business and Ashford Inc.’s business occasioned by COVID-19, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the ERFP Agreement. Specifically, as of the date of this filing, Ashford LLC has a remaining commitment to provide approximately $9.4 million in ERFP funding to us in respect of its initial $50 million commitment.

Ashford LLC, however, is not required to commit to provide funding under the ERFP Agreement if its unrestricted cash balance, after taking into account the cash amount required for such funding, would be less than $15.0 million. Given the significant negative impact that COVID-19 has had on the business of Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC, it is uncertain whether Ashford LLC will be able to provide us with this additional funding, either because Ashford LLC’s unrestricted cash balance falls below $15.0 million or Ashford LLC is otherwise financially unable or unwilling to provide such funding. Moreover, we are also entitled to receive an additional $11.4 million in payments from Ashford LLC with respect to our purchase of the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square in 2019. On March 13, 2020, an extension agreement was entered into whereby the due date for such payment was extended to December 31, 2022. It is uncertain whether Ashford LLC will be able to make this payment and, if such payment is made, the timing of such payment. Furthermore, if Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC do not fulfill their contractual obligations pursuant to the ERFP Agreement, we may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with Ashford Inc. and Ashford LLC, and legal action against either party could negatively impact that relationship.

Additionally, under the terms of the ERFP Agreement, we are required on a going forward basis to pay an asset management fee to our advisor, Ashford Inc., with respect to any hotel purchased with money funded pursuant to the ERFP Agreement, even after such hotel is disposed of, including as a result of foreclosure. As a result, if any hotel purchased with funds provided pursuant to the ERFP Agreement is foreclosed upon or otherwise disposed of, including the Embassy Suites New York Manhattan Times Square or the Hilton Scotts Valley hotel in Santa Cruz, California (the property level secured debt of each of which is in default and has been accelerated by lenders), we will still be obligated to pay Ashford Inc. an asset management fee as if we continued to own the hotels.

We are required to make minimum base management fee payments to our advisor, Ashford Inc., under our advisory agreement, which must be paid even if our total market capitalization and performance decline. Similarly, we are required to make minimum base hotel management fee payments under our hotel management agreements with Remington Hotels, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., which must be paid even if revenues at our hotels decline significantly.

Pursuant to the advisory agreement between us and our advisor, we must pay our advisor on a monthly basis a base management fee (based on our total market capitalization and performance), subject to a minimum base management fee. The minimum base management fee is equal to the greater of: (i) 90% of the base fee paid for the same month in the prior fiscal year; and (ii) 1/12th of the “G&A Ratio” for the most recently completed fiscal quarter multiplied by our total market capitalization on the last balance sheet date included in the most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q or annual report on Form 10-K that we file with the SEC. Thus, even if our total market capitalization and performance decline, including as a result of the impact of COVID-19, we will still be required to make monthly payments to our advisor equal to the minimum base management fee (which we expect will equal 90% of the base fee paid for the same month in the prior fiscal year), which could adversely impact our liquidity and financial condition.

Similarly, pursuant to our hotel management agreement with Remington Hotels, a subsidiary of Ashford Inc., we pay Remington Hotels monthly base hotel management fees on a per hotel basis equal to the greater of approximately $14,000 (increased annually based on consumer price index adjustments) or 3% of gross revenues. As a result, even if revenues at our hotels decline significantly, we will still be required to make minimum monthly payments to Remington Hotels equal to approximately $14,000 (increased annually based on consumer price index adjustments), which could adversely impact our liquidity and financial condition.

Some of our hotels are subject to ground leases; if we are found to be in breach of a ground lease or are unable to renew a ground lease, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

Some of our hotels are on land subject to ground leases, at least two of which cover the entire property. Accordingly, we only own a long-term leasehold rather than a fee simple interest, with respect to all or a portion of the real property at these hotels. We may not continue to make payments due on our ground leases, particularly in light of the downturn in our business occasioned by COVID-19. If we fail to make a payment on a ground lease or are otherwise found to be in breach of a ground lease, we could lose the right to use the hotel or the portion of the hotel property that is subject to the ground lease. In addition, unless we can purchase the fee simple interest in the underlying land and improvements, or extend the terms of these ground leases before their expiration, we will lose our right to operate these properties and our interest in the improvements upon expiration of the ground leases. We may not be able to renew any ground lease upon its expiration, or if renewed, the terms may not be favorable. Our ability to exercise any extension options relating to our ground leases is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease at the time that we exercise such options. If we lose the right to use a hotel due to a breach or non-renewal of the ground lease, we would be unable to derive income from such hotel and would need to purchase an interest in another hotel to attempt to replace that income, which

could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects. Our ability to refinance a hotel property subject to a ground lease may be negatively impacted as the ground lease expiration date approaches.


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

The following table provides the information with respect to purchases and forfeitures of shares of our common stock during each of the months in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017:~~2020:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share			Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan ⁽¹⁾	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan		Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share			Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan ⁽¹⁾	Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
Common stock:
July 1 to July 31	1,840	$	—	⁽²⁾	—	$	200,000,000
August 1 to August 31	6,438	—		⁽²⁾	—	200,000,000
September 1 to September 30	5,924	—		⁽²⁾	—	200,000,000
January 1 to January 31								3,573		$	—	⁽²⁾	—	$	200,000,000
February 1 to February 29								110,351	⁽³⁾	2.27		⁽²⁾	—	200,000,000
March 1 to March 31								161,815	⁽³⁾	0.85		⁽²⁾	—	200,000,000
Total	14,202	$	—		—			275,739		$	1.45		—

____________________

⁽¹⁾

~~In September 2011, our~~On December 5, 2017, the board of directors ~~announced~~reapproved the ~~reinstatement~~Repurchase Program pursuant to which the board of ~~our 2007 share~~directors granted a repurchase ~~program and authorized~~authorization to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock having an ~~increase in repurchase plan authorization from the remaining $58.4 million~~aggregate value of up to ~~$200.0~~$200 million. The plan provides for: (i) the repurchase of shares of our common stock, Series A preferred stock and Series D preferred stock, and /or (ii) discounted purchases of outstanding debt obligations, including debt secured by hotel assets. No shares of common or preferred stock have been repurchased under this program since September 2011 and none are authorized for purchase without further authorization from our board of ~~directors.~~directors’ authorization replaced any previous repurchase authorizations.


⁽²⁾	There is no cost associated with the forfeiture of 3,573, 5,555 and 20,545 restricted shares ~~of 1,840, 6,438 and 5,924~~ of our common stock in ~~July, August~~January, February and ~~September,~~March, respectively.


⁽³⁾	Includes 104,796 and 141,270 shares in February and March, respectively, that were withheld to cover tax-withholding requirements related to the vesting of restricted shares of our common stock issued to employees of our advisor pursuant to the Company’s stockholder-approved stock incentive plan.


ITEM 3.	~~DEFAULT~~DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.


ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.


ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS



Exhibit	Description
3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended by Amendment Number One to Articles of Amendment and Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 15, 2015) (File No. 333-204235)

3.2	Amendment Number Two to Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, filed on May 22, 2017)

3.3	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on October 26, 2014, by Amendment No.2 on October 19, 2015 and by Amendment No. 3 on August 2, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, filed on August 8, 2016)

10.1	Extension Agreement to Enhanced Return Funding Program Agreement and Amendment No. 31 to ~~Seventh~~the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, ~~of Limited Partnership of~~dated March 13, 2020, by and among Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, ~~dated August 25, 2017~~Ashford TRS Corporation, Ashford Inc., and Ashford Hospitality Advisors LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.1 to the Registrant’s~~10.2 of Form 8-K filed on ~~August 25, 2017)~~March 16, 2020)

12*10.2	~~Statement Regarding Computation~~Letter Agreement, dated March 13, 2020, by and between Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC and Ashford TRS Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ~~Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends~~Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2020)

31.1*	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2*	Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The following materials from the Company’s ~~quarterly report~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 are formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements Comprehensive Income (Loss); (iii) Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act, ~~of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”),~~ or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.	~~Submitted electronically with this report.~~
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Submitted electronically with this report.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Submitted electronically with this report.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Submitted electronically with this report.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.	Submitted electronically with this report.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.	Submitted electronically with this report.
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

* Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.



Date:	~~November 7, 2017~~May 27, 2020	By:	/s/ ~~DOUGLAS A. KESSLER~~J. ROBISON HAYS, III
			~~Douglas A. Kessler~~J. Robison Hays, III
			President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:	~~November 7, 2017~~May 27, 2020	By:	/s/ DERIC S. EUBANKS
			Deric S. Eubanks
			Chief Financial Officer

5358



	Preferred Stock																									Additional Paid In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interests In Consolidated Entities		Total			Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
	Series A					Series D					Series F			Series G			Series H				Common Stock
	Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount			Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance at January 1, 2017	1,657		$	17		9,469		$	95		4,800	$	48	6,200	$	62	$	—	$	—	96,377		$	964		$	1,764,450		$	(974,015	)	$	756	$	792,377		$	132,768
Purchases of common stock	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		(203	)	(2		)	(1,271		)	—			—		(1,273		)	—
Equity-based compensation	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			5,002			—			—		5,002			3,749
Forfeitures of restricted shares	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		(49	)	—			—			—			—		—			—
Issuance of restricted shares/units	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		1,271		12			(12		)	—			—		—			94
Redemption of preferred shares	(1,657	)	(17		)	(1,565	)	(16		)	—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			(76,014		)	(4,507		)	—		(80,554		)	—
Issuances of preferred shares	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		3,800		38		—		—			91,596			—			—		91,634			—
Dividends declared - common shares	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(35,319		)	—		(35,319		)	—
Dividends declared - preferred shares- Series A	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(2,539		)	—		(2,539		)	—
Dividends declared - preferred shares- Series D	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(14,891		)	—		(14,891		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred shares- Series F	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(6,637		)	—		(6,637		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred shares- Series G	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(8,573		)	—		(8,573		)	—
Dividends declared – preferred shares- Series H	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(712		)	—		(712		)	—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			—			—		—			(7,655		)
Redemption/conversion of operating partnership units	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		20		—			161			—			—		161			(161		)
Redemption value adjustment	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(1,841		)	—		(1,841		)	1,841
Net income (loss)	—		—			—		—			—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—			—			(37,037		)	4		(37,033		)	(13,202		)
Balance at September 30, 2017	—		$	—		7,904		$	79		4,800	$	48	6,200	$	62	3,800		$	38	97,416		$	974		$	1,783,912		$	(1,086,071	)	$	760	$	699,802		$	117,434



	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value:
Marketable securities	$	11,960	$	11,960	$	53,185	$	53,185
Derivative assets, net	1,721		1,721		3,614		3,614
Derivative liabilities, net	146		146		—		—

Financial assets not measured at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents ⁽¹⁾	$	393,527	$	393,527	$	348,067	$	348,067
Restricted cash ⁽¹⁾	133,127		133,127		144,406		144,406
Accounts receivable, net ⁽¹⁾	61,677		61,677		44,934		44,934
Due from third-party hotel managers	19,230		19,230		13,348		13,348

Financial liabilities not measured at fair value:
Indebtedness⁽¹⁾	$	3,708,265	$3,541,070 to $3,913,817		$	3,773,604	$3,600,691 to $3,979,713
Accounts payable and accrued expenses ⁽¹⁾	153,772		153,772		128,309		128,309
Dividends and distributions payable	25,520		25,520		24,765		24,765
Due to Ashford Inc., net	13,689		13,689		15,716		15,716
Due to Ashford Prime OP, net	—		—		488		488
Due to related party, net ⁽¹⁾	326		326		1,046		1,046
Due to third-party hotel managers	2,627		2,627		2,714		2,714