Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q


☒         QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017


March 31, 2023

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from __________ to ___________


Commission File Number: 001-35236

orclogo.jpg

Orchid Island Capital, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland

27-3269228

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


3305 Flamingo Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32963

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)


(772) 231-1400

(Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol:

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

ORC

New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company", and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

  

Emerging growth company


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No ý

Number of shares outstanding at October 27, 2017: 46,108,208April 28, 2023: 39,134,901



ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

1

 
ITEM 1.

Condensed Financial Statements

1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

1

 1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)

2

 

Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)

2

3

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (unaudited)3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

4

 4

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

5

ITEM 2. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

23

24

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

43

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

46

46
 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

47

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

47

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

47

ITEM 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

47

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

47

ITEM 5. Other Information

47

ITEM 6. Exhibits

48

SIGNATURES

49

49

 


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM1. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC. 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
($ in thousands, except per share data) 
  
  (Unaudited)    
   September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
ASSETS:      
Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value      
Pledged to counterparties $3,917,425  $2,972,290 
Unpledged  12,915   49,884 
Total mortgage-backed securities  3,930,340   3,022,174 
Cash and cash equivalents  161,659   73,475 
Restricted cash  19,629   20,950 
Accrued interest receivable  15,410   11,512 
Derivative assets, at fair value  16,871   10,365 
Other assets  475   218 
Total Assets $4,144,384  $3,138,694 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
         
LIABILITIES:        
Repurchase agreements $3,710,077  $2,793,705 
Dividends payable  6,343   4,616 
Derivative liabilities, at fair value  2,591   1,982 
Accrued interest payable  4,815   1,826 
Due to affiliates  762   566 
Other liabilities  5,395   3,220 
Total Liabilities  3,729,983   2,805,915 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:        
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued        
and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016  -   - 
Common Stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 45,308,169        
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 32,962,919 shares issued        
and outstanding as of December 31, 2016  453   330 
Additional paid-in capital  413,948   332,449 
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)  -   - 
Total Stockholders' Equity  414,401   332,779 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $4,144,384  $3,138,694 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
1

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC. 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
(Unaudited) 
For the Nine and Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 
($ in thousands, except per share data) 
             
  Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Interest income $105,864  $62,059  $38,974  $22,358 
Interest expense  (28,116)  (10,629)  (12,638)  (3,979)
Net interest income  77,748   51,430   26,336   18,379 
Realized gains on mortgage-backed securities  3,354   4,482   769   229 
Unrealized (losses) gains on mortgage-backed securities  (35,601)  5,652   (3,553)  (2,398)
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments  (29,331)  (32,594)  (5,470)  6,587 
FHLB stock dividends  -   14   -   - 
Net portfolio income  16,170   28,984   18,082   22,797 
                 
Expenses:                
Management fees  4,230   2,968   1,528   1,052 
Allocated overhead  1,168   963   412   336 
Accrued incentive compensation  439   598   209   212 
Directors' fees and liability insurance  722   763   215   236 
Audit, legal and other professional fees  547   654   157   193 
Direct REIT operating expenses  816   426   320   187 
Other administrative  259   215   58   55 
Total expenses  8,181   6,587   2,899   2,271 
                 
Net income $7,989  $22,397  $15,183  $20,526 
                 
Basic and diluted net income per share $0.21  $0.99  $0.33  $0.85 
                 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding  38,608,053   22,619,293   45,355,124   24,133,343 
                 
Dividends declared per common share $1.26  $1.26  $0.42  $0.42 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
2

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC. 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 
(Unaudited) 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 
($ in thousands, except per share data) 
             
     Additional  Retained    
  Common  Paid-in  Earnings    
  Stock  Capital  (Deficit)  Total 
Balances, January 1, 2017 $330  $332,449  $-  $332,779 
Net income  -   -   7,989   7,989 
Cash dividends declared, $1.26 per share  -   (41,688)  (7,989)  (49,677)
Issuance of common stock pursuant to public offerings, net  123   122,734   -   122,857 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to stock based                
compensation plan  -   232   -   232 
Amortization of stock based compensation  -   221   -   221 
Balances, September 30, 2017 $453  $413,948  $-  $414,401 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
3

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC. 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
(Unaudited) 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 
($ in thousands) 
       
  2017  2016 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net income $7,989  $22,397 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Stock based compensation  453   492 
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on mortgage-backed securities  32,247   (10,134)
Realized and unrealized gains on interest rate swaptions  (827)  (36)
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on interest rate swaps  1,398   (792)
Realized losses on forward settling to-be-announced securities  3,843   2,385 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accrued interest receivable  (3,898)  (967)
Other assets  (170)  (93)
Accrued interest payable  2,989   1,010 
Other liabilities  (601)  (204)
Due to affiliates  196   15 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES  43,619   14,073 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
From mortgage-backed securities investments:        
Purchases  (5,079,945)  (2,184,709)
Sales  3,890,959   1,717,612 
Principal repayments  248,483   178,460 
Redemption of FHLB stock  3   3,750 
Payments on net settlement of to-be-announced securities  (7,945)  (2,145)
Purchase of interest rate swaptions, net of margin cash received  410   705 
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (948,035)  (286,327)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from repurchase agreements  39,895,749   22,443,458 
Principal payments on repurchase agreements  (38,979,377)  (21,944,174)
Principal payments on FHLB advances  -   (187,500)
Cash dividends  (47,950)  (28,864)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs  122,857   47,116 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  991,279   330,036 
         
NET INCREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  86,863   57,782 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, beginning of the period  94,425   69,959 
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, end of the period $181,288  $127,741 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid during the period for:        
Interest $25,127  $9,619 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Securities acquired settled in later period $-  $72,343 
Securities sold settled in later period  -   27,509 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
4

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

($ in thousands, except per share data)

  

(Unaudited)

     
  

March 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

ASSETS:

        

Mortgage-backed securities, at fair value (includes pledged assets of $3,946,156 and $3,512,640, respectively)

 $3,999,906  $3,540,002 

U.S. Treasury Notes, at fair value (includes pledged assets of $36,806 and $36,382, respectively)

  36,806   36,382 

Cash and cash equivalents

  143,220   205,651 

Restricted cash

  42,738   31,568 

Accrued interest receivable

  13,120   11,519 

Derivative assets

  29,315   40,172 

Other assets

  907   442 

Total Assets

 $4,266,012  $3,865,736 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

        
         

LIABILITIES:

        

Repurchase agreements

 $3,769,437  $3,378,445 

Dividends payable

  6,279   5,908 

Derivative liabilities

  19,582   7,161 

Accrued interest payable

  14,753   9,209 

Due to affiliates

  1,229   1,131 

Other liabilities

  3,371   25,119 

Total Liabilities

  3,814,651   3,426,973 
         

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

          
         

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

        

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022

  -   - 

Common Stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 39,085,756 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and 36,764,983 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022

  391   368 

Additional paid-in capital

  788,647   779,602 

Accumulated deficit

  (337,677)  (341,207)

Total Stockholders' Equity

  451,361   438,763 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

 $4,266,012  $3,865,736 

See Notes to Financial Statements

1

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022

($ in thousands, except per share data)

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

Interest income

 $38,012  $41,857 

Interest expense

  (42,217)  (2,655)

Net interest (expense) income

  (4,205)  39,202 

Realized losses on mortgage-backed securities

  -   (51,086)

Unrealized gains (losses) on mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury Notes

  53,895   (309,962)

(Losses) gains on derivative and other hedging instruments

  (41,156)  177,498 

Net portfolio income (loss)

  8,534   (144,348)
         

Expenses:

        

Management fees

  2,642   2,634 

Allocated overhead

  576   441 

Incentive compensation

  470   237 

Directors' fees and liability insurance

  323   311 

Audit, legal and other professional fees

  451   304 

Direct REIT operating expenses

  165   325 

Other administrative

  377   127 

Total expenses

  5,004   4,379 
         

Net income (loss)

 $3,530  $(148,727)
         

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share

 $0.09  $(4.20)
         

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

  38,491,767   35,399,513 
         

Dividends declared per common share

 $0.480  $0.775 

See Notes to Financial Statements

2

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022

(in thousands)

          

Additional

  

Retained

     
  

Common Stock

  

Paid-in

  

Earnings

     
  

Shares

  

Par Value

  

Capital

  

(Deficit)

  

Total

 
                     

Balances, January 1, 2023

  36,765  $368  $779,602  $(341,207) $438,763 

Net income

  -   -   -   3,530   3,530 

Cash dividends declared

  -   -   (18,807)  -   (18,807)

Stock based awards and amortization

  4   -   181   -   181 

Issuance of common stock pursuant to public offerings, net

  2,690   26   31,631   -   31,657 

Shares repurchased and retired

  (373)  (3)  (3,960)  -   (3,963)

Balances, March 31, 2023

  39,086  $391  $788,647  $(337,677) $451,361 
                     

Balances, January 1, 2022

  35,399  $354  $850,497  $(82,754) $768,097 

Net loss

  -   -   -   (148,727)  (148,727)

Cash dividends declared

  -   -   (27,492)  -   (27,492)

Stock based awards and amortization

  25   -   540   -   540 

Balances, March 31, 2022

  35,424  $354  $823,545  $(231,481) $592,418 

See Notes to Financial Statements

3

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022

($ in thousands)

  

2023

  

2022

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

        

Net income (loss)

 $3,530  $(148,727)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

        

Stock based compensation

  409   162 

Realized losses on mortgage-backed securities

  -   51,086 

Unrealized (gains) losses on mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury Notes

  (53,895)  309,962 

Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on derivative instruments

  43,563   (101,921)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Accrued interest receivable

  (1,601)  4,006 

Other assets

  (459)  (833)

Accrued interest payable

  5,544   230 

Other liabilities

  182   204 

Due to affiliates

  98   4 

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

  (2,629)  114,173 
         

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

        

From mortgage-backed securities investments:

        

Purchases

  (467,460)  - 

Sales

  -   1,413,039 

Principal repayments

  61,021   157,112 

Net (payments on) proceeds from derivative instruments

  (42,450)  103,900 

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

  (448,889)  1,674,051 
         

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

        

Proceeds from repurchase agreements

  7,849,145   12,861,900 

Principal payments on repurchase agreements

  (7,458,153)  (14,641,897)

Cash dividends

  (18,422)  (31,010)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

  31,657   - 

Common stock repurchases, including shares withheld from employee stock awards for payment of taxes

  (3,970)  (214)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

  400,257   (1,811,221)
         

NET DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH

  (51,261)  (22,997)

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, beginning of the period

  237,219   450,442 

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, end of the period

 $185,958  $427,445 
         

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

        

Cash paid during the period for:

        

Interest

 $36,673  $2,425 
         

See Notes to Financial Statements

4

ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL,INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2023

(Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Organization and Business Description


Orchid Island Capital, Inc. ("Orchid"(“Orchid” or the "Company"“Company”), was incorporated in Maryland on August 17, 2010 for the purpose of creating and managing a leveraged investment portfolio consisting of residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"(“RMBS”).  From incorporation to the completion of Orchid’s initial public offering of its common stock on February 20, 2013, Orchid was a wholly owned subsidiary of Bimini Capital Management, Inc. ("Bimini"(“Bimini”).  Orchid began operations on November 24, 2010 (the(the date of commencement of operations).  From incorporation through November 24, 2010, Orchid'sOrchid’s only activity was the issuance of common stock to Bimini.


On February 20, 2013, Orchid completed the initial public offering ("IPO") of its common stock in which it sold approximately 2.4 million shares of its common stock and raised gross proceeds of $35.4 million, which were invested in RMBS that were issued and the principal and interest of which were guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation or agency ("Agency RMBS") on a leveraged basis.  Orchid is an "emerging growth company" as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the "JOBS Act").


On JulyOctober 29, 2016, 2021, Orchid entered into an equity distribution agreement (the "July 2016 “October 2021 Equity Distribution Agreement"Agreement”) with twofour sales agents pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000$250,000,000 of shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock in transactions that were deemed to be "at“at the market"market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. The Company issued a total of 10,174,9929,742,188 shares under the July 2016 October 2021 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $110.0approximately $151.8 million, and net proceeds of approximately $108.2$149.3 million, net ofafter commissions and fees, prior to its termination in February 2017.

March 2023. 

On February 23, 2017, March 7, 2023, Orchid entered into anotheran equity distribution agreement as amended and restated on May 10, 2017, (the "May 2017 “March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement"Agreement”) with twothree sales agents pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000$250,000,000 of shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock in transactions that are deemed to be "at“at the market"market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. The May 2017 No shares have been issued under the March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement replaced the July 2016 Equity Distribution Agreement. The Company issued a total of 12,299,032 shares under the May 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $125.0 million, and net proceeds of approximately $122.9 million, net of commissions and fees, prior to its termination in August 2017.


On August 2, 2017, Orchid entered into another equity distribution agreement (the "August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement") with two sales agents pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000 of shares of the Company's common stock in transactions that are deemed to be "at the market" offerings and privately negotiated transactions.  The August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement replaced the May 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement. Through September 30, 2017, the Company has not issued any shares under the August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement.

5


through March 31, 2023.

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates


The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"(“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Orchid Island Casualty, LLC.  Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentationstatement of results for the interim period have been included. Operating results for the nine and three month periodsperiod ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.


2023.

The balance sheet at December 31, 20162022 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.


2022.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The significant estimates affecting the accompanying financial statements are the fair values of RMBS and derivatives.


Statement Management believes the estimates and assumptions underlying the financial statements are reasonable based on the information available as of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

In accordanceMarch 31, 2023.

Reclassification of Comparative Period Information

The Company previously reported $0.3 million of commissions, fees and other expenses associated with its derivative holdings for the three months ended March 31, 2022 in 'Direct REIT operating expenses' in the statement of operations.  These expenses have been reclassified as part of  'Gains (losses) on derivative and other hedging instruments' to conform with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, a statementpresentation in the current period.

5

Common Stock Reverse Split

On August 30, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of its common stock and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock. All share, per share, deferred stock unit (“DSU”) and performance unit (“PU”) information has no itemsbeen retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse split. The shares of other comprehensive income (loss).  Comprehensive income (loss)common stock retain a par value of $0.01 per share.

Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

The Company obtains interests in VIEs through its investments in mortgage-backed securities. The Company’s interests in these VIEs are passive in nature and are not expected to result in the Company obtaining a controlling financial interest in these VIEs in the future. As a result, the Company does not consolidate these VIEs and accounts for these interests in these VIEs as mortgage-backed securities. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Company’s investments in mortgage-backed securities. The maximum exposure to loss for these VIEs is the same as net income (loss) forcarrying value of the periods presented.


mortgage-backed securities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash


Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit with financial institutions and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Restricted cash includes cash pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and other borrowings, and interest rate swaps and other derivative instruments.


The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the statement of financial position that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the statement of cash flows.


(in thousands)    
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
Cash and cash equivalents $161,659  $73,475 
Restricted cash  19,629   20,950 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $181,288  $94,425 

(in thousands)

        
  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $143,220  $205,651 

Restricted cash

  42,738   31,568 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 $185,958  $237,219 

The Company maintains cash balances at fourthree banks, a government securities backed overnight sweep fund, and atexcess margin on account with two exchange clearing members. At times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses related to these balances. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures eligible accounts up to $250,000$250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. At September 30, 2017, the Company's cash deposits exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $158.1 million. Restricted cash balances are uninsured, but are held in separate customer accounts that are segregated from the general funds of the counterparty. The Company limits uninsured balances to only large, well-known bankbanks and derivative counterpartiesexchange clearing members and believes that it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents or restricted cash balances.


6

Mortgage-Backed Securities


and U.S. Treasury Notes

The Company invests primarily in mortgage pass-through ("PT"(“PT”) certificates,residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligations and(“CMOs”) issued by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae, interest-only ("IO"(“IO”) securities and inverse interest-only ("IIO"(“IIO”) securities representing interest in or obligations backed by pools of RMBS. The Company refers to RMBS and CMOs as PT RMBS. The Company refers to IO and IIO securities as structured RMBS. The Company also invests in U.S. Treasury Notes, primarily to satisfy collateral requirements of derivative counterparties. The Company has elected to account for its investment in RMBS and U.S. Treasury Notes under the fair value option. Electing the fair value option requires the Company to record changes in fair value in the consolidated statementstatements of operations, which, in management'smanagement’s view, more appropriately reflects the results of ourthe Company’s operations for a particular reporting period and is consistent with the underlying economics and how the portfolio is managed.


The Company records RMBSsecurities transactions on the trade date. Security purchases that have not settled as of the balance sheet date are included in the RMBSportfolio balance with an offsetting liability recorded, whereas securities sold that have not settled as of the balance sheet date are removed from the RMBSportfolio balance with an offsetting receivable recorded.

6


Fair value of the Company's investments in RMBS is governed by FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement.  The definition of fair value in FASB ASC 820 focuses ondefined as the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability either occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability, or in the absence of a principal market, occurs in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Estimated fair values for RMBS are based on independent pricing sources and/or third party broker quotes, when available.


Estimated fair values for U.S. Treasury Notes are based on quoted prices for identical assets in active markets.

Income on PT RMBS securitiesand U.S. Treasury Notes is based on the stated interest rate of the security. Premiums or discounts present at the date of purchase are not amortized. Premium lost and discount accretion resulting from monthly principal repayments are reflected in unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS in the consolidated statements of operations. For IO securities, the income is accrued based on the carrying value and the effective yield. The difference between income accrued and the interest received on the security is characterized as a return of investment and serves to reduce the asset'sasset’s carrying value. At each reporting date, the effective yield is adjusted prospectively from thefor future reporting periodperiods based on the new estimate of prepayments and the contractual terms of the security. For IIO securities, effective yield and income recognition calculations also take into account the index value applicable to the security. Changes in fair value of RMBS during each reporting period are recorded in earnings and reported as unrealized gains or losses on mortgage-backed securities in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.


Realized gains and losses on sales of RMBS and U.S. Treasury Notes, using the specific identification method, are reported as a separate component of net portfolio income on the statements of operations.

Derivative Financialand Other Hedging Instruments

The Company uses derivative and other hedging instruments to manage interest rate risk, facilitate asset/liability strategies and manage other exposures, and it may continue to do so in the future. The principal instruments that the Company has used to date are Treasury Note ("T-Note"(“T-Note”), federal funds (“Fed Funds”) and Eurodollar futures contracts, short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, interest rate swaps, and options to enter in interest rate swaps ("(“interest rate swaptions"swaptions”), and “to-be-announced” (“TBA”) securities transactions, but the Company may enter into other derivativesderivative and other hedging instruments in the future.


The Company purchases a portion of its Agency RMBS through forward settling transactions, including "to-be-announced" ("TBA") securities transactions.  At times when market conditions are conducive, the Company may choose to move the settlement of these TBA securities transactions out to a later date by entering into an offsetting short position, which is then net settled for cash, and simultaneously entering into a substantially similar TBA securities trade for a later settlement date.  Such a set of transactions is referred to as a TBA "dollar roll" transaction.  The TBA securities purchased at the later settlement date are typically priced at a discount to securities for settlement in the current month.  This difference is referred to as the "price drop."  The price drop represents compensation to the Company for foregoing net interest margin and is referred to as TBA "dollar roll income."  Specified pools of mortgage loans can also be the subject of a TBA dollar roll transaction, when market conditions allow.

7


The Company accounts for TBA securities as derivative instruments if either the TBA securities do not settle in the shortest period of time possible or if the Company cannot assert that it is probable at inception of the TBA transaction, or throughout its term, that it will take physical delivery of the Agency RMBS for a long position, or make delivery of the Agency RMBS for a short position, upon settlement of the trade. The Company accounts for TBA dollar roll transactions as a series of derivative transactions.instruments. Gains losses and dollar roll incomelosses associated with TBA securities transactions and dollar roll transactions are reported in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  The fair value of TBA securities is estimated based on similar methods used to value RMBS securities.


The Company has elected not to treat any of its derivative financial

Derivative and other hedging instruments as hedges in order to align the accounting treatment of its derivative instruments with the treatment of its portfolio assets under the fair value option election. FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires that all derivative instruments beare carried at fair value.  Changesvalue, and changes in fair value are recorded in earnings for each period.


The Company’s derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedge accounting relationships, but rather are used as economic hedges of its portfolio assets and liabilities. Gains and losses on derivatives, except those that result in cash receipts or payments, are included in operating activities on the statements of cash flows. Cash payments and cash receipts from settlements of derivatives, including current period net cash settlements on interest rates swaps, are classified as an investing activity on the statements of cash flows.

Holding derivatives creates exposure to credit risk related to the potential for failure on the part of counterparties and exchanges to honor their commitments. In addition, the Company may be required to post collateral based on any declines in the market value of the derivatives.  In the event of default by a counterparty, the Company may have difficulty recovering its collateral and may not receive payments provided for under the terms of the agreement. ToThe Company’s derivative agreements require it to post or receive collateral to mitigate this risk,such risk. In addition, the Company uses only registered central clearing exchanges and well-established commercial banks as counterparties.


counterparties, monitors positions with individual counterparties and adjusts posted collateral as required.

Financial Instruments


FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the

The fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value is disclosed either in the body of the financial statements or in the accompanying notes. RMBS, EurodollarFed Funds and T-Note futures contracts, interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions and TBA securities are accounted for at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value for these instruments are presented in Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements.


The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accrued interest receivable, receivable for securities sold, other assets, due to affiliates, repurchase agreements, payable for unsettled securities purchased, accrued interest payable and other liabilities generally approximates their carrying values as as Level 2 assets under the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 20162022 due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

7


Repurchase Agreements


The Company finances the acquisition of the majority of its RMBS through the use of repurchase agreements under master repurchase agreements. Pursuant to ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, the Company accountsRepurchase agreements are accounted for repurchase transactions as collateralized financing transactions, which are carried at their contractual amounts, including accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements.


Manager Compensation


The Company is externally managed by Bimini Advisors, LLC (the "Manager"“Manager” or "Bimini Advisors"“Bimini Advisors”), a Maryland limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bimini. The Company'sCompany’s management agreement with the Manager provides for payment to the Manager of a management fee and reimbursement of certain operating expenses, which are accrued and expensed during the period for which they are earned or incurred. Refer to Note 13 for the terms of the management agreement.


8


Earnings Per Share


The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share.

Basic earnings per share ("EPS"(“EPS”) is calculated as net income or loss attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding or subscribed during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated using the treasury stock or two-classtwo-class method, as applicable, for common stock equivalents, if any. However, the common stock equivalents are not included in computing diluted EPS if the result is anti-dilutive.


Stock-Based Compensation

The Company may grant equity-based compensation to non-employee members of its Board of Directors and to the executive officers and employees of the Manager. Stock-based awards issued include PUs, DSUs and immediately vested common stock awards. Compensation expense is measured and recognized for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and non-employee directors based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized over each award’s respective service period using the graded vesting attribution method. The Company does not estimate forfeiture rates; but rather, adjusts for forfeitures in the periods in which they occur.

Income Taxes


Orchid has qualifiedelected and electedis organized and operated so as to qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"(“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"“Code”). REITs are generally not subject to federal income tax on their REIT taxable income provided that they distribute to their stockholders at least 90%all of their REIT taxable income on an annual basis. In addition, aA REIT must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deductions for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, and meet other provisionsrequirements of the Code to retain its tax status.


Orchid measures, recognizes and presents its uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes.  Under that guidance,

Orchid assesses the likelihood, based on their technical merit, that uncertain tax positions will be sustained upon examination based on the facts, circumstances and information available at the end of each period. All of Orchid'sOrchid’s tax positions are categorized as highly certain. There is no accrual for any tax, interest or penalties related to Orchid'sOrchid’s tax position assessment. The measurement of uncertain tax positions is adjusted when new information is available, or when an event occurs that requires a change.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows – (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 requires that restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents be included as components of total cash and cash equivalents as presented on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017.  Early application is permitted.  The Company adopted the ASU beginning with the first quarter of 2017. The prior period consolidated statement of cash flows has been retrospectively adjusted to conform to this presentation.


In August 2016, March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement2020-04Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of Cash Flows –the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” ASU 2020-04 provides optional expedients and exceptions to GAAP requirements for modifications on debt instruments, leases, derivatives, and other contracts, related to the expected market transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), and certain other floating rate benchmark indices, or collectively, IBORs, to alternative reference rates. ASU 2020-04 generally considers contract modifications related to reference rate reform to be an event that does not require contract remeasurement at the modification date nor a reassessment of a previous accounting determination. The guidance in ASU 2020-04 is optional and may be elected over time, through December 31, 2022, as reference rate reform activities occur. In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06 "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. 848)," deferring the sunset date provided in ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after 2020-04 from December 15, 2017.  Early application is permitted.  31, 2022 to December 31, 2024. The Company does not believe the adoption ofexpects to adopt this ASU during the second quarter of 2023 as SOFR replaces LIBOR for certain derivative positions but does not believe that this will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

8


In June 2016, January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses2021-01Reference Rate Reform (Topic 326): Measurement848).” ASU 2021-01 expands the scope of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASC 848 to include all affected derivatives and give market participants the ability to apply certain aspects of the contract modification and hedge accounting expedients to derivative contracts affected by the discounting transition. In addition, ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost2021-01 adds implementation guidance to permit a company to apply certain optional expedients to modifications of interest rate indexes used for margining, discounting or contract price alignment of certain derivatives as a result of reference rate reform initiatives and extends optional expedients to account for a derivative contract modified as a continuation of the existing contract and to continue hedge accounting when certain other instrumentscritical terms of a hedging relationship change to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred tomodifications made as part of the current expected credit loss model).discounting transition. The guidance in ASU 2016-132021-01 is effective for fiscal years,immediately and for interim periods within those years, beginning after available generally through December 15, 2019.  Early application is permitted for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018.31, 2024, as reference rate reform activities occur. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect ofexpects to adopt this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.


In January 2016,during the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurementsecond quarter of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  ASU 2016-01 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial assets and financial liabilities.  ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017 and, for most provisions, is effective using the cumulative-effect transition approach.  Early application is permitted2023 as SOFR replaces LIBOR for certain provisions.  The Companyderivative positions but does not believe the adoption ofthat this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


9

NOTE 2. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES


AND U.S. TREASURY NOTES

The following table presents the Company'sCompany’s RMBS portfolio as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016:


(in thousands)      
   September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Pass-Through RMBS Certificates:      
Hybrid Adjustable-rate Mortgages $42,201  $45,459 
Adjustable-rate Mortgages  1,783   2,062 
Fixed-rate Mortgages  3,740,658   2,826,694 
Total Pass-Through Certificates  3,784,642   2,874,215 
Structured RMBS Certificates:        
Interest-Only Securities  90,551   69,726 
Inverse Interest-Only Securities  55,147   78,233 
Total Structured RMBS Certificates  145,698   147,959 
Total $3,930,340  $3,022,174 

2022:

(in thousands)

        
  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

Pass-Through RMBS Certificates:

        

Fixed-rate Mortgages

 $3,980,462  $3,519,906 

Total Pass-Through Certificates

  3,980,462   3,519,906 

Structured RMBS Certificates:

        

Interest-Only Securities

  18,962   19,669 

Inverse Interest-Only Securities

  482   427 

Total Structured RMBS Certificates

  19,444   20,096 

Total

 $3,999,906  $3,540,002 

As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company held U.S. Treasury Notes with a fair value of approximately $36.8 million and $36.4 million, respectively, primarily to satisfy collateral requirements of one of its derivative counterparties.

The following table summarizes the Company's RMBS portfolio as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, according to the contractual maturitiesis a summary of the securities inCompany’s net gain (loss) from the portfolio. Actual maturitiessale of RMBS investments are generally shorter than stated contractual maturities for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and are affected by the contractual lives2022.

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

Proceeds from sales of RMBS

 $-  $1,413,039 

Carrying value of RMBS sold

  -   (1,464,125)

Net loss on sales of RMBS

 $-  $(51,086)
         

Gross gain on sales of RMBS

 $-  $709 

Gross loss on sales of RMBS

  -   (51,795)

Net loss on sales of RMBS

 $-  $(51,086)

9


(in thousands)      
  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Greater than one year and less than five years $52  $157 
Greater than five years and less than ten years  2,771   277 
Greater than or equal to ten years  3,927,517   3,021,740 
Total $3,930,340  $3,022,174 

NOTE 3. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND OTHER BORROWINGS


The Company pledges certain of its RMBS as collateral under repurchase agreements with financial institutions. Interest rates are generally fixed based on prevailing rates corresponding to the terms of the borrowings, and interest is generally paid at the termination of a borrowing. If the fair value of the pledged securities declines, lenders will typically require the Company to post additional collateral or pay down borrowings to re-establish agreed upon collateral requirements, referred to as "margin calls." Similarly, if the fair value of the pledged securities increases, lenders may release collateral back to the Company. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, the Company had met all margin call requirements.


As of September 30, 2017, the Company had outstanding repurchase obligations of approximately $3,710.1 million with a net weighted average borrowing rate of 1.37%.  These agreements were collateralized by RMBS with a fair value, including accrued interestMarch 31, 2023 and securities pledged related to securities sold but not yet settled, of approximately $3,932.6 million, and cash pledged to the counterparties of approximately $12.0 million.  As of December 31, 2016,2022, the Company had outstanding repurchase obligations of approximately $2,793.7 million with a net weighted average borrowing rate of 1.00%.  These agreements were collateralized by RMBS with a fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $2,970.9 million, and cash pledged to the counterparties of approximately $10.8 million.


10


As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company'sCompany’s repurchase agreements had remaining maturities as summarized below:

($ in thousands)               
   OVERNIGHT  BETWEEN 2  BETWEEN 31  GREATER    
   (1 DAY OR  AND  AND  THAN    
  LESS)  30 DAYS  90 DAYS  90 DAYS  TOTAL 
September 30, 2017 
Fair market value of securities pledged, including               
accrued interest receivable $-  $2,506,628  $941,339  $484,607  $3,932,574 
Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with                    
these securities $-  $2,358,459  $897,376  $454,242  $3,710,077 
Net weighted average borrowing rate  -   1.34%  1.34%  1.57%  1.37%
December 31, 2016 
Fair market value of securities pledged, including                    
accrued interest receivable $-  $2,284,815  $686,065  $-  $2,970,880 
Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with                    
these securities $-  $2,154,766  $638,939  $-  $2,793,705 
Net weighted average borrowing rate  -   1.01%  0.96%  -   1.00%

($ in thousands)

                    
  

OVERNIGHT

  

BETWEEN 2

  

BETWEEN 31

  

GREATER

     
  

(1 DAY OR

  

AND

  

AND

  

THAN

     
  

LESS)

  

30 DAYS

  

90 DAYS

  

90 DAYS

  

TOTAL

 

March 31, 2023

                    

Fair market value of securities pledged, including accrued interest receivable

 $-  $2,760,937  $1,070,036  $128,049  $3,959,022 

Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with these securities

 $-  $2,632,522  $1,017,354  $119,561  $3,769,437 

Net weighted average borrowing rate

  -   4.88%  4.96%  4.70%  4.90%

December 31, 2022

                    

Fair market value of securities pledged, including accrued interest receivable

 $-  $2,496,769  $884,632  $142,658  $3,524,059 

Repurchase agreement liabilities associated with these securities

 $-  $2,404,329  $837,299  $136,817  $3,378,445 

Net weighted average borrowing rate

  -   4.43%  4.51%  4.15%  4.44%

Included in the table above are repurchase agreements with outstanding principal balances of approximately $255.2 million and $190.3 million as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, with interest rates indexed to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") that reprice daily.

In addition, cash pledged to counterparties for repurchase agreements was approximately $18.1 million and $13.3 million as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.

If, during the term of a repurchase agreement, a lender files for bankruptcy, the Company might experience difficulty recovering its pledged assets,, which could result in an unsecured claim against the lender for the difference between the amount loaned to the Company plus interest due to the counterparty and the fair value of the collateral pledged to such lender,, including the accrued interest receivable and cash posted by the Company as collateral. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, the Company had an aggregate amount at risk (the difference between the amount loaned to the Company, including interest payable and securities posted by the counterparty (if any), and the fair value of securities and cash pledged (if any), including accrued interest on such securities) with all counterparties of approximately $227.9$193.2 million. The Company did not have an amount at risk with any individual counterparty that was greater than 10% of the Company'sCompany’s equity at September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.


2022.

10

NOTE 4. DERIVATIVE FINANCIALAND OTHER HEDGING INSTRUMENTS


In connection with its interest rate risk management strategy, the Company economically hedges a portion of the cost of its repurchase agreement funding by entering into derivatives and other hedging contracts.  To date, the Company has entered into Eurodollar and T-Note futures contracts, interest rate swaps, and interest rate swaptions, but may enter into other contracts in the future.  The Company has not elected hedging treatment under GAAP, and as such all gains or losses (realized and unrealized) on these instruments are reflected in earnings for all periods presented.

In addition, the Company utilizes TBA securities as a means of investing in and financing Agency RMBS or as a means of reducing its exposure to Agency RMBS, and also a hedge for tax purposes. The Company accounts for TBA securities as derivative instruments if either the TBA securities do not settle in the shortest period of time possible or if the Company cannot assert that it is probable at inception and throughout the term of the TBA securities that it will take physical delivery of the Agency RMBS for a long position, or make delivery of the Agency RMBS for a short position, upon settlement of the trade.

11


Derivative Assets (Liabilities), at Fair Value

The table below summarizes fair value information about ourthe Company’s derivative and other hedging instruments assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.


(in thousands)       
Derivative Instruments and Related AccountsBalance Sheet Location September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets       
Interest rate swapsDerivative assets, at fair value $10,693  $10,302 
Payer swaptionsDerivative assets, at fair value  3,194   - 
TBA securitiesDerivative assets, at fair value  2,984   63 
Total derivative assets, at fair value  $16,871  $10,365 
          
Liabilities         
Interest rate swapsDerivative liabilities, at fair value $2,591  $802 
TBA securitiesDerivative liabilities, at fair value  -   1,180 
Total derivative liabilities, at fair value  $2,591  $1,982 
          
Margin Balances Posted to (from) Counterparties         
Futures contractsRestricted cash $6,193  $9,419 
TBA securitiesRestricted cash  -   446 
TBA securitiesOther liabilities  (1,867)  - 
Interest rate swaption contractsOther liabilities  (2,776)  - 
Interest rate swap contractsRestricted cash  1,437   - 
Total margin balances on derivative contracts  $2,987  $9,865 

Eurodollar2022.

(in thousands)

         

Derivative and Other Hedging Instruments

Balance Sheet Location

 

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

Assets

         

Interest rate swaps

Derivative assets, at fair value

 $13,972  $4,983 

Payer swaptions (long positions)

Derivative assets, at fair value

  14,849   33,398 

Interest rate caps

Derivative assets, at fair value

  474   1,119 

TBA securities

Derivative assets, at fair value

  20   672 

Total derivative assets, at fair value

 $29,315  $40,172 
          

Liabilities

         

Payer swaptions (short positions)

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

 $8,528  $5,982 

TBA securities

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

  11,054   1,179 

Total derivative liabilities, at fair value

 $19,582  $7,161 
          

Margin Balances Posted to (from) Counterparties

         

Futures contracts

Restricted cash

 $15,547  $16,493 

TBA securities

Restricted cash

  9,119   1,734 

TBA securities

Other liabilities

  (372)  (532)

Interest rate swaption contracts

Other liabilities

  (1,505)  (12,489)

Total margin balances on derivative contracts

 $22,789  $5,206 

Fed Funds and T-Note futures are cash settled futures contracts on an interest rate, with gains and losses credited or charged to the Company'sCompany’s cash accounts on a daily basis. A minimum balance, or "margin"“margin”, is required to be maintained in the account on a daily basis. The tables below present information related to the Company's Eurodollar andCompany’s T-Note futures positions at September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.


($ in thousands)            
  September 30, 2017 
  Average  Weighted  Weighted    
  Contract  Average  Average    
  Notional  Entry  Effective  Open 
Expiration Year Amount  Rate  Rate  
Equity(1)
 
Eurodollar Futures Contracts (Short Positions)            
2017 $1,000,000   1.62%  1.48% $(340)
2018  1,000,000   1.84%  1.73%  (1,091)
2019  1,000,000   2.09%  1.98%  (1,138)
2020  925,000   2.62%  2.13%  (4,505)
Total / Weighted Average $976,923   2.13%  1.91% $(7,074)
                 
Treasury Note Futures Contracts (Short Position)(2)
                
September 2017 10-year T-Note futures                
(Sep 2017 - Sep 2027 Hedge Period) $115,000   1.98%  2.16% $(81)

12


($ in thousands)            
  December 31, 2016 
  Average  Weighted  Weighted    
  Contract  Average  Average    
  Notional  Entry  Effective  Open 
Expiration Year Amount  Rate  Rate  
Equity(1)
 
Eurodollar Futures Contracts (Short Positions)            
2017 $600,000   1.48%  1.28% $(1,206)
2018  600,000   1.81%  1.82%  76 
2019  675,000   2.00%  2.21%  1,429 
2020  700,000   2.65%  2.45%  (1,394)
Total / Weighted Average $643,750   2.01%  1.97% $(1,095)
                 
Treasury Note Futures Contracts (Short Position)(2)
                
March 2017 10 year T-Note futures                
(Mar 2017 - Mar 2027 Hedge Period) $465,000   2.27%  2.24% $(3,134)

2022.

($ in thousands)

                
  

March 31, 2023

 
  

Average

  

Weighted

  

Weighted

     
  

Contract

  

Average

  

Average

     
  

Notional

  

Entry

  

Effective

  

Open

 

Expiration Year

 

Amount

  

Rate

  

Rate

  

Equity(1)

 

Treasury Note Futures Contracts (Short Positions)(2)

                

June 2023 5-year T-Note futures (Jun 2023 - Jun 2028 Hedge Period)

 $926,500   4.17%  3.89% $(20,719)

June 2023 10-year Ultra futures (Jun 2023 - Jun 2033 Hedge Period)

 $54,200   3.91%  3.48% $(2,181)

($ in thousands)

                
  

December 31, 2022

 
  

Average

  

Weighted

  

Weighted

     
  

Contract

  

Average

  

Average

     
  

Notional

  

Entry

  

Effective

  

Open

 

Expiration Year

 

Amount

  

Rate

  

Rate

  

Equity(1)

 

Treasury Note Futures Contracts (Short Position)(2)

                

March 2023 5-year T-Note futures (Mar 2023 - Mar 2028 Hedge Period)

 $750,500   4.20%  4.22% $(100)

March 2023 10-year Ultra futures (Mar 2023 - Mar 2033 Hedge Period)

 $174,500   3.66%  3.79% $965 

(1)

(1)

Open equity represents the cumulative gains (losses) recorded on open futures positions from inception.

(2)

(2)

5-Year T-Note futures contracts were valued at a price of $125.31$109.5 at September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and $124.28$107.9 at December 31, 2016.2022. The notional contract values of the short positions were $144.1$1,014.6 million and $577.9$810.0 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016,2022, respectively.10-Year Ultra futures contracts were valued at a price of $121.1 at March 31, 2023 and $118.3 at December 31, 2022. The contract value of the short position was $65.7 million and $206.4 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively

11


Under ourits interest rate swap agreements, wethe Company typically paypays a fixed rate and receivereceives a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") ("payer swaps"). based on an index, such as the LIBOR and SOFR. The floating rate we receivethe Company receives under ourits swap agreements has the effect of offsetting the repricing characteristics of ourits repurchase agreements and cash flows on such liabilities. We areThe Company is typically required to post collateral on ourits interest rate swap agreements. The table below presents information related to the Company'sCompany’s interest rate swap positions at September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.


($ in thousands)               
     Average     Net    
     Fixed  Average  Estimated  Average 
  Notional  Pay  Receive  Fair  Maturity 
  Amount  Rate  Rate  Value  (Years) 
September 30, 2017               
Expiration > 1 to ≤ 3 years $650,000   1.09%  1.31% $10,318   2.3 
Expiration > 3 to ≤ 5 years  360,000   2.05%  1.32%  (2,216)  4.5 
  $1,010,000   1.43%  1.31% $8,102   3.1 
December 31, 2016                    
Expiration > 3 to ≤ 5 years $700,000   1.20%  0.91% $9,500   3.4 

2022.

($ in thousands)

                
      

Average

         
      

Fixed

  

Average

  

Average

 
  

Notional

  

Pay

  

Receive

  

Maturity

 
  

Amount

  

Rate

  

Rate

  

(Years)

 

March 31, 2023

                

Expiration > 3 to ≤ 5 years

 $500,000   0.84%  5.02%  3.5 

Expiration > 5 years

  1,174,000   2.10%  4.88%  7.2 
  $1,674,000   1.72%  4.92%  6.1 

December 31, 2022

                

Expiration > 3 to ≤ 5 years

 $500,000   0.84%  4.75%  3.7 

Expiration > 5 years

  900,000   1.70%  4.23%  6.6 
  $1,400,000   1.39%  4.41%  5.6 

The table below presents our open payer swap positions by receive index, as a percentage of notional amount.

  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

Overnight SOFR

  58%  50%

Three Month LIBOR

  42%  50%
   100%  100%

As of March 31, 2023, the table above includes a swap with a notional amount of $274.0 million that begins accruing interest on February 24, 2024 with a fixed pay rate of 3.43% and a receive rate indexed to overnight SOFR.

Our interest rate swaps are centrally cleared through two registered commodities exchanges, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange ("CME") and the London Clearing House (“LCH”). The clearing exchanges require that we post an "initial margin" amount determined by the exchanges. The initial margin amount is intended to be set at a level sufficient to protect the exchange from the interest rate swap's maximum estimated single-day price movement and is subject to adjustment based on changes in market volatility and other factors. We also exchange daily settlements of "variation margin" based upon changes in fair value, as measured by the exchanges.

The table below presents information related to the Company'sCompany’s interest rate cap positions at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

($ in thousands)

                 
               

Net

 
          

Strike

   

Estimated

 
  

Notional

      

Swap

 

Curve

 

Fair

 
  

Amount

  

Cost

  

Rate

 

Spread

 

Value

 

March 31, 2023

                 

February 8, 2024

 $200,000  $1,450   0.09%

2Y10Y

 $474 
              

December 31, 2022

                 

February 8, 2024

 $200,000  $1,450   0.09%

2Y10Y

 $1,119 

12

The table below presents information related to the Company’s interest rate swaption positions at September 30, 2017.


($ in thousands)                
 OptionUnderlying Swap
       Weighted      Weighted
       Average  FixedReceiveAverage
      FairMonths toNotionalPayRateTerm
Expiration CostValueExpirationAmountRate(LIBOR)(Years)
Payer Swaptions                
≤ 1 year$2,367$3,19411.0$200,0002.16%3 Month6.0

13


March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

($ in thousands)

                         
  

Option

  

Underlying Swap

 
          

Weighted

           

Weighted

 
          

Average

      

Average

 

Average

 

Average

 
      

Fair

  

Months to

  

Notional

  

Fixed

 

Adjustable

 

Term

 

Expiration

 

Cost

  

Value

  

Expiration

  

Amount

  

Rate

 

Rate

 

(Years)

 

March 31, 2023

                         

Payer Swaptions - long

                         

≤ 1 year

 $36,685  $6,548   6.6  $1,250,000   4.09%

SOFR

  10.0 

>1 year

  10,115   8,301   21.7   1,000,000   3.49%

SOFR

  2.0 
  $46,800  $14,849   13.3  $2,250,000   3.82%   6.4 

Payer Swaptions - short

                         

>1 year

 $(12,252) $(8,528)  13.0  $(1,917,000)  3.91%

SOFR

  5.8 

December 31, 2022

                         

Payer Swaptions (long positions)

                         

≤ 1 year

 $36,685  $21,253   9.6  $1,250,000   4.09%

SOFR

  10.0 

> 10 years

  11,021   12,145   239.5   120,000   2.05%

SOFR

  10.0 
  $47,706  $33,398   29.8  $1,370,000   3.91%   10.0 

Payer Swaptions (short positions)

                         

≤ 1 year

 $(17,800) $(5,982)  3.6  $(917,000)  4.09%

SOFR

  10.0 

The following table summarizes ourthe Company’s contracts to purchase and sell TBA securities as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.

($ in thousands)        
  Notional     Net
  Amount Cost Market Carrying
  
Long (Short)(1)
 
Basis(2)
 
Value(3)
 
Value(4)
September 30, 2017        
30-Year TBA securities:        
 3.0%$(300,000)$(303,773)$(300,789)$2,984
December 31, 2016        
30-Year TBA securities:        
 3.0%$(100,000)$(99,406)$(99,344)$62
 4.0% (100,000) (103,898) (105,078) (1,180)
Total$(200,000)$(203,304)$(204,422)$(1,118)
2022.

($ in thousands)

                
  

Notional

          

Net

 
  

Amount

  

Cost

  

Market

  

Carrying

 
  

Long (Short)(1)

  

Basis(2)

  

Value(3)

  

Value(4)

 

March 31, 2023

                

30-Year TBA securities:

                

2.0%

 $(175,000) $(144,511) $(144,526) $(15)

3.0%

  (700,000)  (616,438)  (627,457)  (11,019)

Total

 $(875,000) $(760,949) $(771,983) $(11,034)

December 31, 2022

                

30-Year TBA securities:

                

2.0%

 $(175,000) $(142,268) $(143,145) $(877)

3.0%

  (500,000)  (440,644)  (440,274)  370 

Total

 $(675,000) $(582,912) $(583,419) $(507)

(1)

(1)

Notional amount represents the par value (or principal balance) of the underlying Agency RMBS.

RMBS.

(2)

(2)

Cost basis represents the forward price to be paid (received) for the underlying Agency RMBS.

RMBS.

(3)

(3)

Market value represents the current market value of the TBA securities (or of the underlying Agency RMBS) as of period-end.

(4)

(4)

Net carrying value represents the difference between the market value and the cost basis of the TBA securities as of period-end and is reported in derivative assets (liabilities), at fair value in our consolidatedthe balance sheets.


13

Gain (Loss) From Derivative and Other Hedging Instruments, Net


The table below presents the effect of the Company'sCompany’s derivative financialand other hedging instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017 March 31, 2023 and 2016.


(in thousands)            
  Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Eurodollar futures contracts (short positions) $(6,955) $(17,507) $607  $1,194 
T-Note futures contracts (short position)  (16,190)  (12,288)  (6,450)  1,688 
Interest rate swaps  (3,170)  (450)  1,005   4,179 
Receiver swaptions  -   36   -   - 
Payer swaptions  827   -   827   - 
Net TBA securities  (3,843)  (2,385)  (1,459)  (474)
Total $(29,331) $(32,594) $(5,470) $6,587 

2022.

(in thousands)

        
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

T-Note futures contracts (short position)

 $(4,038) $79,691 

Interest rate swaps

  (26,144)  66,170 

Payer swaptions (short positions)

  6,585   (10,908)

Payer swaptions (long positions)

  (12,109)  40,975 

Interest rate caps

  (645)  (996)

Interest rate floors

  1,185   - 

TBA securities (short positions)

  (5,990)  2,539 

TBA securities (long positions)

  -   27 

Total

 $(41,156) $177,498 

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features


The use of derivatives and other hedging instruments creates exposure to credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to these instruments fail to perform their obligations under the contracts. WeThe Company attempts to minimize this risk by limiting ourits counterparties for instruments which are not centrally cleared on a registered exchange to major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings and monitoring positions with individual counterparties. In addition, we the Company may be required to pledge assets as collateral for ourits derivatives, whose amounts vary over time based on the market value, notional amount and remaining term of the derivative contract. In the event of a default by a counterparty,, we the Company may not receive payments provided for under the terms of ourits derivative agreements, and may have difficulty obtaining ourits assets pledged as collateral for ourits derivatives. The cash and cash equivalents pledged as collateral for ourthe Company derivative instruments are included in restricted cash on our consolidatedits balance sheets.

It is the Company's policy not to offset assets and liabilities associated with open derivative contracts. However, CME, Intercontinental Exchange ("ICE"), and LCH rules characterize variation margin transfers as settlement payments, as opposed to adjustments to collateral. As a result, derivative assets and liabilities associated with centrally cleared derivatives for which the CME, ICE, or LCH serves as the central clearing party are presented as if these derivatives had been settled as of the reporting date.


14


NOTE 5. PLEDGED ASSETS


Assets Pledged to Counterparties


The table below summarizes ourthe Company’s assets pledged as collateral under our repurchase agreements prime brokerage clearing accounts,and derivative agreements and insurance capital by type, including securities pledged related to securities sold but not yet settled, as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.2022.

(in thousands)

                        
  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 
  

Repurchase

  

Derivative

      

Repurchase

  

Derivative

     

Assets Pledged to Counterparties

 

Agreements

  

Agreements

  

Total

  

Agreements

  

Agreements

  

Total

 

PT RMBS - fair value

 $3,926,711  $-  $3,926,711  $3,492,544  $-  $3,492,544 

Structured RMBS - fair value

 $19,445   -   19,445   20,096   -   20,096 

U.S. Treasury Notes

  -   36,806   36,806   -   36,382   36,382 

Accrued interest on pledged securities

  12,867   4   12,871   11,419   16   11,435 

Restricted cash

  18,072   24,666   42,738   13,341   18,227   31,568 

Total

 $3,977,095  $61,476  $4,038,571  $3,537,400  $54,625  $3,592,025 

14


(in thousands)         
  September 30, 2017 
  Repurchase  Derivative    
Assets Pledged to Counterparties Agreements  Agreements  Total 
PT RMBS - fair value $3,779,375  $-  $3,779,375 
Structured RMBS - fair value  138,050   -   138,050 
Accrued interest on pledged securities  15,150   -   15,150 
Restricted cash  11,999   7,630   19,629 
Total $3,944,574  $7,630  $3,952,204 

(in thousands)               
  December 31, 2016 
  Repurchase  Clearing  Derivative  Insurance    
Assets Pledged to Counterparties Agreements  Margin  Agreements  
Capital(1)
  Total 
PT RMBS - fair value $2,854,062  $-  $-  $1,065  $2,855,127 
Structured RMBS - fair value  106,195   10,968   -   -   117,163 
Accrued interest on pledged securities  10,623   266   -   4   10,893 
Restricted cash  10,835   -   9,865   250   20,950 
Total $2,981,715  $11,234  $9,865  $1,319  $3,004,133 

(1)Orchid Island Casualty, Inc. was required to maintain sufficient capital in the form of cash and securities to protect it against losses.

Assets Pledged from Counterparties


The table below summarizes our assets pledged to usthe Company from counterparties under our repurchase agreements and derivative agreements as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.


(in thousands)                  
 September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
 Repurchase Derivative   Repurchase Derivative   
Assets Pledged to OrchidAgreements Agreements Total Agreements Agreements Total 
Cash $253  $4,643  $4,896  $1,029  $-  $1,029 
PT RMBS - fair value  1,768   -   1,768   -   -   - 
U.S. Treasury securities - fair value  -   -   -   3,438   -   3,438 
Total $2,021  $4,643  $6,664  $4,467  $-  $4,467 

PT RMBS and U.S. Treasury securities received as margin under our repurchase agreements are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheets because the counterparty retains ownership of the security. 2022.

(in thousands)

                        
  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 
                         
  

Repurchase

  

Derivative

      

Repurchase

  

Derivative

     

Assets Pledged to Orchid

 

Agreements

  

Agreements

  

Total

  

Agreements

  

Agreements

  

Total

 

Cash

 $4,053  $1,877  $5,930  $3,075  $13,021  $16,096 

U.S. Treasury securities - fair value

  5,000   -  $5,000   197   -   197 

Total

 $9,053  $1,877  $10,930  $3,272  $13,021  $16,293 

Cash received as margin is recognized inas cash and cash equivalents with a corresponding amount recognized as an increase in repurchase agreements or other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.


15


NOTE 6. OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


The Company's derivativesCompany’s derivative agreements and repurchase agreements are subject to underlying agreements with master netting or similar arrangements, which provide for the right of offset in the event of default or in the event of bankruptcy of either party to the transactions. The Company reports its assets and liabilities subject to these arrangements on a gross basis.


basis in the case of repurchase agreements and for certain derivative agreements. CME and LCH rules characterize variation margin transfers as settlement payments, as opposed to adjustments to collateral. As a result, derivative assets and liabilities associated with centrally cleared derivatives for which the CME or LCH serves as the central clearing party are presented as if these derivatives had been settled as of the reporting date.

The following table presents information regarding those assets and liabilities subject to such arrangements as if the Company had presented them on a net basis as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016.2022.

(in thousands)

                        

Offsetting of Assets

 
              

Gross Amount Not

     
          

Net Amount

  

Offset in the Balance Sheet

     
          

of Assets

  

Financial

         
  

Gross Amount

  

Gross Amount

  

Presented

  

Instruments

  

Cash

     
  

of Recognized

  

Offset in the

  

in the

  

Received as

  

Received as

  

Net

 
  

Assets

  

Balance Sheet

  

Balance Sheet

  

Collateral

  

Collateral

  

Amount

 

March 31, 2023

                        

Interest rate swaps

 $13,972  $-  $13,972  $-  $-  $13,972 

Interest rate swaptions

  14,849   -   14,849   -   (1,505)  13,344 

Interest rate caps

  474   -   474   -   -   474 

TBA securities

  20   -   20   -   (20)  - 
  $29,315  $-  $29,315  $-  $(1,525) $27,790 

December 31, 2022

                        

Interest rate swaps

 $4,983  $-  $4,983  $-  $-  $4,983 

Interest rate swaptions

  33,398   -   33,398   -   (12,489)  20,909 

Interest rate caps

  1,119   -   1,119   -   -   1,119 

TBA securities

  672   -   672   -   (532)  140 
  $40,172  $-  $40,172  $-  $(13,021) $27,151 

15


(in thousands)                  
Offsetting of Assets 
     Net Amount Gross Amount Not Offset in the   
     of Assets Consolidated Balance Sheet   
   Gross Amount Presented Financial     
 Gross Amount Offset in the in the Instruments Cash   
 of Recognized Consolidated Consolidated Received as Received as Net 
 Assets Balance Sheet Balance Sheet Collateral Collateral Amount 
September 30, 2017                  
Interest rate swaps $10,693  $-  $10,693  $-  $-  $10,693 
Interest rate swaptions  3,194   -   3,194   -   (2,776)  418 
TBA securities  2,984   -   2,984   -   (1,867)  1,117 
  $16,871  $-  $16,871  $-  $(4,643) $12,228 
December 31, 2016                        
Interest rate swaps $10,302  $-  $10,302  $-  $-  $10,302 
TBA securities  63   -   63   -   (63)  - 
  $10,365  $-  $10,365  $-  $(63) $10,302 

(in thousands)                  
Offsetting of Liabilities 
     Net Amount Gross Amount Not Offset in the    
     of Assets Consolidated Balance Sheet    
   Gross Amount Presented Financial     
 Gross Amount Offset in the in the Instruments     
 of Recognized Consolidated Consolidated Posted as Cash Posted Net 
 Liabilities Balance Sheet Balance Sheet Collateral Collateral Amount 
September 30, 2017                  
Repurchase Agreements $3,710,077  $-  $3,710,077  $(3,698,078) $(11,999) $- 
Interest rate swaps  2,591   -   2,591   -   (1,437)  1,154 
  $3,712,668  $-  $3,712,668  $(3,698,078) $(13,436) $1,154 
December 31, 2016                        
Repurchase Agreements $2,793,705  $-  $2,793,705  $(2,782,870) $(10,835) $- 
Interest rate swaps  802   -   802   -   (802)  - 
TBA securities  1,180   -   1,180   -   (848)  332 
  $2,795,687  $-  $2,795,687  $(2,782,870) $(12,485) $332 

 

(in thousands)

                        

Offsetting of Liabilities

 
              

Gross Amount Not

     
          

Net Amount

  

Offset in the Balance Sheet

     
          

of Liabilities

  

Financial

         
  

Gross Amount

  

Gross Amount

  

Presented

  

Instruments

         
  

of Recognized

  

Offset in the

  

in the

  

Posted as

  

Cash Posted

  

Net

 
  

Liabilities

  

Balance Sheet

  

Balance Sheet

  

Collateral

  

as Collateral

  

Amount

 

March 31, 2023

                        

Repurchase Agreements

 $3,769,437  $-  $3,769,437  $(3,751,365) $(18,072) $- 

Interest rate swaptions

  8,528   -   8,528   -   -   8,528 

TBA securities

  11,054   -   11,054   -   (9,119)  1,935 
  $3,789,019  $-  $3,789,019  $(3,751,365) $(27,191) $10,463 

December 31, 2022

                        

Repurchase Agreements

 $3,378,445  $-  $3,378,445  $(3,365,104) $(13,341) $- 

Interest rate swaps

  -   -   -   -   -   - 

Interest rate swaptions

  5,982   -   5,982   -   -   5,982 

TBA securities

  1,179   -   1,179   -   (1,179)  - 
  $3,385,606  $-  $3,385,606  $(3,365,104) $(14,520) $5,982 

The amounts disclosed for collateral received by or posted to the same counterparty up to and not exceeding the net amount of the asset or liability presented in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the actual collateral received by or posted to the same counterparty typically exceeds the amounts presented. See Note 5 for a discussion of collateral posted or received against or for repurchase obligations and derivative and other hedging instruments.


16


NOTE 7. CAPITAL STOCK


Reverse Stock Split

On August 30, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of its common stock and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock. All share, per share, DSU and PU information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse split. The shares of common stock retain a par value of $0.01 per share.

16

Common Stock Issuances


During 2017the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2016,the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company completed the following public offerings of shares of its common stock.  There were no common stock issuances through public offerings during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and September 30, 2017.


($ in thousands, except per share amounts)         
   Weighted       
   Average       
   Price       
   Received     Net 
Type of OfferingPeriod 
Per Share(1)
  Shares  
Proceeds(2)
 
2017          
At the Market Offering Program(3)
First Quarter $10.13   1,286,196  $12,792 
At the Market Offering Program(3)
Second Quarter  10.17   11,012,836   110,065 
        12,299,032  $122,857 
2016             
At the Market Offering Program(3)
Second Quarter $10.48   646,753  $6,591 
At the Market Offering Program(3)
Third Quarter  10.80   3,818,802   40,525 
At the Market Offering Program(3)
Fourth Quarter  10.79   6,707,101   71,212 
        11,172,656  $118,328 

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

             
   

Weighted

         
   

Average

         
   

Price

         
   

Received

      

Net

 

Type of Offering

Period

 

Per Share(1)

  

Shares

  

Proceeds(2)

 

2023

             

At the Market Offering Program(3)

First Quarter

 $11.77   2,690,000  $31,657 
        2,690,000  $31,657 

2022

             

At the Market Offering Program(3)

First Quarter

 $-   -  $- 

At the Market Offering Program(3)

Second Quarter

  -   -   - 

At the Market Offering Program(3)

Third Quarter

  -   -   - 

At the Market Offering Program(3)

Fourth Quarter

  10.45   3,885,048   40,580 
        3,885,048  $40,580 

(1)

(1)

Weighted average price received per share is gross of underwriters'after deducting the underwriters’ discount, if applicable, and other offering costs.

(2)

(2)

Net proceeds are net of the underwriters'underwriters’ discount, if applicable, and other offering costs.

(3)

(3)

The Company has entered into fiveeleven equity distribution agreements, allten of which have either been terminated because all shares were sold or were replaced with a subsequent agreement.agreement


Share

Stock Repurchase Program


On July 29, 2015, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2,000,000400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On February 8, 2018, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 904,564 shares of the Company's common stock. Coupled with the 156,751 shares remaining from the original 400,000 share authorization, the increased authorization brought the total authorization to 1,061,316 shares, representing 10% of the Company’s then outstanding share count.

On December 9, 2021, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 3,372,399 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program to 3,539,861 shares, representing approximately 10% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock.

On October 12, 2022, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 4,300,000 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program to 6,183,601 shares, representing approximately 18% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock.

As part of the sharestock repurchase program, shares may be purchased in open market transactions, including through block purchases, through privately negotiated transactions, or pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-110b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act”). Open market repurchases will be made in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 10b-18,10b-18, which sets certain restrictions on the method, timing, price and volume of open market stock repurchases. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company in its discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The authorization does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be suspended or discontinued at the Company'sCompany’s discretion without prior notice. The stock repurchase program has no termination date.

17


From the inception of the sharestock repurchase program through September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, the Company repurchased a total of 1,216,2434,048,613 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $10.8$68.8 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $16.99 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2023, the Company repurchased a total of 373,041 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $4.0 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $10.62 per share.  During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company repurchased a total of 2,538,470 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $24.5 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $8.92$9.63 per share. No shares were repurchased duringThe remaining authorization under the year ended December 31, 2016 or the nine months ended September 30, 2017.


17


stock repurchase program as of April 28, 2023 was 4,928,350 shares.

Cash Dividends


The table below presents the cash dividends declared on the Company'sCompany’s common stock.


(in thousands, except per share amounts) 
Year Per Share Amount  Total 
2013 $1.395  $4,662 
2014  2.160   22,643 
2015  1.920   38,748 
2016  1.680   41,388 
2017 - YTD(1)
  1.400   56,027 
Totals $8.555  $163,468 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Year

 

Per Share Amount

  

Total

 

2013

 $6.975  $4,662 

2014

  10.800   22,643 

2015

  9.600   38,748 

2016

  8.400   41,388 

2017

  8.400   70,717 

2018

  5.350   55,814 

2019

  4.800   54,421 

2020

  3.950   53,570 

2021

  3.900   97,601 

2022

  2.475   87,906 

2023 - YTD(1)

  0.640   25,098 

Totals

 $65.290  $552,568 

(1)

(1)

On October 11, 2017,April 12, 2023, the Company declared a dividend of $0.14$0.16 per share to be paid on November 10, 2017.May 26, 2023. The effect of this dividend is included in the table above but is not reflected in the Company'sCompany’s financial statements as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023.


NOTE 8. STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


In October 2012,2021, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors adopted, and Bimini, then the Company's sole stockholder,stockholders approved, the Orchid Island Capital, Inc. 20122021 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan"“2021 Incentive Plan”) to recruitreplace the Orchid Island Capital, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan” and retain employees, directors and other service providers, including employees oftogether with the Manager and other affiliates.2021 Incentive Plan, the “Incentive Plans”). The2021 Incentive Plan provides for the award of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock award, performance units,awards, PUs, other equity-based awards (and dividend equivalents with respect to awards of performance unitsPUs and other equity-based awards) and incentive awards. The2021 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors except that the Company'sCompany’s full Board of Directors will administer awards made to directors who are not employees of the Company or its affiliates. The2021 Incentive Plan provides for awards of up to an aggregate of 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of ourthe Company’s common stock (on a fully diluted basis) at the time of the awards, subject to a maximum aggregate 4,000,0001,473,324 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock that may be issued under the 2021Incentive Plan.


Restricted Stock Awards

The table below presents information related to2021 Incentive Plan replaces the Company's restricted common stock at September 30, 20172012 Incentive Plan, and 2016.

($ in thousands, except per share data)            
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
     Weighted     Weighted 
     Average     Average 
     Grant Date     Grant Date 
  Shares  Fair Value  Shares  Fair Value 
Unvested, beginning of period  8,000  $12.23   16,000  $12.23 
Granted  -   -   -   - 
Vested and issued  (8,000)  12.23   (8,000)  12.23 
Unvested, end of period  -  $-   8,000  $12.23 
                 
Compensation expense during period     $33      $73 
Unrecognized compensation expense, end of period     $-      $57 
Intrinsic value, end of period     $-      $83 
Weighted-average remaining vesting term (in years)      -       0.6 

18


Stock Awards

no further grants will be made under the 2012 Incentive Plan. However, any outstanding awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan will continue in accordance with the terms of the 2012 Incentive Plan and any award agreement executed in connection with such outstanding awards.

Performance Units

The Company issues immediately vested common stockhas issued, and may in the future issue additional, PUs under the Incentive Plan to certain executive officers, employees and directors. The following table presents information related to fully vested common stock issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.


($ in thousands, except per share data)      
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Fully vested shares granted(1)
  25,848   37,695 
Weighted average grant date price per share $9.76  $10.05 
Compensation expense related to fully vested common share awards(2)
 $252  $379 

(1)The table above includes 17,335 fully vested shares of common stock which were granted in January and March 2017 with respect to service performed during 2016 and 33,019 fully vested shares common stock which were granted in January and March 2016 with respect to service performed during 2015.
(2)Approximately $168,000 of compensation expense related to the 2017 share awards was accrued and recognized in 2016.  Approximately $330,000 of compensation expense related to the 2016 share awards was accrued and recognized in 2015.

Performance Units

The Company may issue performance units under the Incentive PlanPlans to certain executive officers and employees.  "Performance Units"employees of its Manager. PUs vest after the end of a defined performance period, based on satisfaction of the performance conditions set forth in the performance unitPU agreement. When earned, each Performance UnitPU will be settled by the issuance of one share of the Company'sCompany’s common stock, at which time the Performance UnitPU will be cancelled. The Performance UnitsPUs contain dividend equivalent rights, which entitle the Participants to receive distributions declared by the Company on common stock, but do not include the right to vote the shares.  Performance Unitsunderlying shares of common stock. PUs are subject to forfeiture should the participant no longer serve as an executive officer or employee forof the Company.Company or the Manager. Compensation expense for the Performance Units arePUs, included in incentive compensation on the statements of operations, is recognized over the remaining vesting period once it becomes probable that the performance conditions will be achieved.

18


The following table presents information related to Performance UnitsPUs outstanding during the ninethree months ended SeptemberMarch 31, 2023 and 2022.

($ in thousands, except per share data)

                
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 
      

Weighted

      

Weighted

 
      

Average

      

Average

 
      

Grant Date

      

Grant Date

 
  

Shares

  

Fair Value

  

Shares

  

Fair Value

 

Unvested, beginning of period

  36,921  $20.57   26,645  $29.40 

Granted

  -   -   35,114   16.55 

Vested and issued

  (4,462)  22.09   (2,664)  29.40 

Unvested, end of period

  32,459  $20.36   59,095  $21.75 
                 

Compensation expense during period

     $90      $106 

Unrecognized compensation expense, end of period

     $267      $942 

Intrinsic value, end of period

     $348      $960 

Weighted-average remaining vesting term (in years)

      1.1       1.8 

Subsequent to March 31, 2023, the Company granted 76,696 PUs to its executive officers and certain of its Manager's employees. These PUs will be earned at the rate of 10% per quarter beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2024 and concluding with the quarter ending June 30, 2017.


($ in thousands, except per share data)            
  Nine Months Ended September, 30, 
  2017  2016 
     Weighted     Weighted 
     Average     Average 
     Grant Date     Grant Date 
  Shares  Fair Value  Shares  Fair Value 
Unvested, beginning of period  45,305  $10.33   7,508  $13.32 
Granted  15,707   9.55   41,500   10.00 
Forfeited  -   -   (100)  10.00 
Vested and issued  (14,490)  10.52   (2,252)  13.32 
Unvested, end of period  46,522  $10.01   46,656  $10.37 
                 
Compensation expense during period     $188      $148 
Unrecognized compensation expense, end of period     $217      $320 
Intrinsic value, end of period     $474      $486 
Weighted-average remaining vesting term (in years)      1.2       1.6 

2026. The number of PUs actually earned is subject to adjustment based on the Company's achievement of certain performance goals as set forth in each PU award agreement.

Stock Awards

The Company has issued, and may in the future issue additional, immediately vested common stock under the Incentive Plans to certain executive officers and employees of its Manager. The following table presents information related to fully vested common stock issued during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. All of the fully vested shares of common stock issued during the three months ended March 31, 2022, and the related compensation expense, were granted with respect to service performed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. Subsequent to March 31, 2023, the Company granted 76,696 shares of fully vested common stock, with a related compensation expense of $0.8 million, to its executive officers and certain employees of its Manager with respect to service performed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

($ in thousands, except per share data)

        
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

Fully vested shares granted

  -   35,114 

Weighted average grant date price per share

 $-  $16.55 

Compensation expense related to fully vested shares of common stock awards

 $-  $581 

Deferred Stock Units

Non-employee directors receive a portion of their compensation in the form of DSU awards pursuant to the Incentive Plans. Each DSU represents a right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock. Beginning in 2022, each non-employee director could elect to receive all of his or her compensation in the form of DSUs. The DSUs are immediately vested and are settled at a future date based on the election of the individual participant. Compensation expense for the DSUs is included in directors’ fees and liability insurance in the statements of operations. The DSUs contain dividend equivalent rights, which entitle the participant to receive distributions declared by the Company on common stock. These dividend equivalent rights are settled in cash or additional DSUs at the participant’s election. The DSUs do not include the right to vote the underlying shares of common stock.

19


The following table presents information related to the DSUs outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

($ in thousands, except per share data)

                
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 
      

Weighted

      

Weighted

 
      

Average

      

Average

 
      

Grant Date

      

Grant Date

 
  

Shares

  

Fair Value

  

Shares

  

Fair Value

 

Outstanding, beginning of period

  54,197  $20.29   28,595  $26.92 

Granted and vested

  9,302   10.59   3,055   21.95 

Outstanding, end of period

  63,499  $18.87   31,650  $26.45 
                 

Compensation expense during period

     $89      $75 

Intrinsic value, end of period

     $681      $514 

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


From time to time, the Company may become involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is not aware of any reported or unreported contingencies at September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023.


NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES


The Company will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its REIT taxable income to the extent that it distributes its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and satisfies the ongoing REIT requirements, including meeting certain asset, income and stock ownership tests. A REIT must generally distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deductions for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain, to its stockholders, annually to maintain REIT status. An amount equal to the sum of which 85% generally of its REIT ordinary income and 95% of its REIT capital gain net income, plus certain undistributed income from prior taxable years, must be distributed within the taxable year, in order to avoid the imposition of an excise tax. The remaining balance may be distributed up to the end of the following taxable year, provided the REIT elects to treat such amount as a prior year distribution and meets certain other requirements.


NOTE 11. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)


The Company had dividend eligible shares of restricted common stockPUs and Performance UnitsDSUs that were outstanding during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023 and 2022. The basic and diluted per share computations include these unvested shares of restricted common stockPUs and performance unitsDSUs if there is income available to common stock, as they have dividend participation rights. The shares of restricted common stockunvested PUs and Performance UnitsDSUs have no contractual obligation to share in losses. Because there is no such obligation, the shares of restricted common stockunvested PUs and Performance UnitsDSUs are not included in the basic and diluted EPS computations when no income is available to common stock even though they are considered participating securities.


The table below reconciles the numerator and denominator of EPS for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017 March 31, 2023 and 2016.2022.

(in thousands, except per share information)

        
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

Basic and diluted EPS per common share:

        

Numerator for basic and diluted EPS per share of common stock:

        

Net income (loss) - Basic and diluted

 $3,530  $(148,727)

Weighted average shares of common stock:

        

Shares of common stock outstanding at the balance sheet date

  39,086   35,423 

Unvested dividend eligible share based compensation outstanding at the balance sheet date

  96   - 

Effect of weighting

  (690)  (23)

Weighted average shares-basic and diluted

  38,492   35,400 

Net income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic and diluted

 $0.09  $(4.20)

Anti-dilutive incentive shares not included in calculation

  -   91 

20


(in thousands, except per-share information)            
  Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Basic and diluted EPS per common share:            
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS per common share:            
Net income - Basic and diluted $7,989  $22,397  $15,183  $20,526 
Weighted average common shares:                
Common shares outstanding at the balance sheet date  45,308   26,252   45,308   26,252 
Unvested dividend eligible share based compensation                
outstanding at the balance sheet date  47   55   47   55 
Effect of weighting  (6,747)  (3,688)  -   (2,174)
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted  38,608   22,619   45,355   24,133 
Net Income per common share:                
Basic and diluted $0.21  $0.99  $0.33  $0.85 

NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE


Authoritative accounting literature establishes a

The framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). A fair value measure should reflect the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including the assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of non-performance. Required disclosures include stratification of balance sheet amounts measured at fair value based on inputs the Company uses to derive fair value measurements. These stratifications are:

20


·

Level 1 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets (which include exchanges and over-the-counter markets with sufficient volume),

·

Level 2 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, and

·

Level 3 valuations, where the valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, but observable based on Company-specific data. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company'sCompany’s own estimates for assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques typically include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, but may also include the use of market prices of assets or liabilities that are not directly comparable to the subject asset or liability.


The Company's RMBS interest rate swaptions and TBA securities are valued using Level 2 valuations, and such valuations currently are determined by the Company based on independent pricing sources and/or third party broker quotes, when available.quotes. Because the price estimates may vary, the Company must make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values. Alternatively,The Company and the Company could optindependent pricing sources use various valuation techniques to havedetermine the price of the Company’s securities. These techniques include observing the most recent market for like or identical assets (including security coupon, maturity, yield, and prepayment speeds), spread pricing techniques to determine market credit spreads (option adjusted spread, zero volatility spread, spread to the U.S. Treasury curve or spread to a benchmark such as a TBA), and model driven approaches (the discounted cash flow method, Black Scholes and SABR models which rely upon observable market rates such as the term structure of interest rates and volatility). The appropriate spread pricing method used is based on market convention. The pricing source determines the spread of recently observed trade activity or observable markets for assets similar to those being priced. The spread is then adjusted based on variances in certain characteristics between the market observation and the asset being priced. Those characteristics include: type of asset, the expected life of the asset, the stability and predictability of the expected future cash flows of the asset, whether the coupon of the asset is fixed or adjustable, the guarantor of the security if applicable, the coupon, the maturity, the issuer, size of the underlying loans, year in which the underlying loans were originated, loan to value ratio, state in which the underlying loans reside, credit score of the underlying borrowers and other variables if appropriate. The fair value of all of its positionsthe security is determined by using the adjusted spread.

The Company’s U.S. Treasury Notes are based on quoted prices for identical instruments in RMBS,active markets and are classified as Level 1 assets.

The Company’s futures contracts are Level 1 valuations, as they are exchange-traded instruments and quoted market prices are readily available. Futures contracts are settled daily. The Company’s interest rate swaps and interest rate swaptions are Level 2 valuations. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined using a discounted cash flow approach using forward market interest rates and TBA securitiesdiscount rates, which are observable inputs. The fair value of interest rate swaptions is determined by eitherusing an independent third-party or could do so internally.


option pricing model.

RMBS (based on the fair value option), interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions,derivatives and TBA securities and futures contracts were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017 March 31, 2023 and 2016.2022. When determining fair value measurements, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets.

21


The following table presents financial assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016:


(in thousands)            
     Quoted Prices       
     in Active  Significant    
     Markets for  Other  Significant 
     Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
  Fair Value  Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
  Measurements  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
September 30, 2017            
Mortgage-backed securities $3,930,340  $-  $3,930,340  $- 
Interest rate swaps  8,102   -   8,102   - 
Interest rate swaptions  3,194   -   3,194   - 
TBA securities  2,984   -   2,984   - 
December 31, 2016                
Mortgage-backed securities $3,022,174  $-  $3,022,174  $- 
Interest rate swaps  9,500   -   9,500   - 
TBA securities  (1,117)  -   (1,117)  - 

2022. Derivative contracts are reported as a net position by contract type, and not based on master netting arrangements.

(in thousands)

            
  

Quoted Prices

         
  

in Active

  

Significant

     
  

Markets for

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Identical

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 
  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

 

March 31, 2023

            

Mortgage-backed securities

 $-  $3,999,906  $- 

U.S. Treasury Notes

  36,806   -   - 

Interest rate swaps

  -   13,972   - 

Interest rate swaptions

  -   6,321   - 

Interest rate caps

  -   474   - 

TBA securities

  -   (11,034)  - 

December 31, 2022

            

Mortgage-backed securities

 $-  $3,540,002  $- 

U.S. Treasury Notes

  36,382   -   - 

Interest rate swaps

  -   4,983   - 

Interest rate swaptions

  -   27,416   - 

Interest rate caps

  -   1,119   - 

TBA securities

  -   (507)  - 

During the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017 March 31, 2023 and 2016,2022, there were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between levels 1,2 or 3.


21


NOTE 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


Management Agreement


The Company is externally managed and advised by Bimini Advisors, LLC (the "Manager"“Manager”) pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. The management agreement has been renewed through February 20, 2018 2024 and provides for automatic one-yearone-year extension options thereafter and is subject to certain termination rights. Under the terms of the management agreement, the Manager is responsible for administering the business activities and day-to-day operations of the Company. The Manager receives a monthly management fee in the amount of:


·One-twelfth

One-twelfth of 1.5% of the first $250$250 million of the Company'sCompany’s month-end equity, as defined in the management agreement,

·One-twelfth

One-twelfth of 1.25% of the Company'sCompany’s month-end equity that is greater than $250$250 million and less than or equal to $500$500 million, and

·One-twelfth

One-twelfth of 1.00% of the Company'sCompany’s month-end equity that is greater than $500$500 million.

On April 1, 2022, pursuant to the third amendment to the management agreement entered into on November 16, 2021, the Manager began providing certain repurchase agreement trading, clearing and administrative services to the Company that had been previously provided by AVM, L.P. under an agreement terminated on March 31, 2022. In consideration for such services, the Company will pay the following fees to the Manager:

A daily fee equal to the outstanding principal balance of repurchase agreement funding in place as of the end of such day multiplied by 1.5 basis points for the amount of aggregate outstanding principal balance less than or equal to $5 billion, and multiplied by 1.0 basis point for any amount of aggregate outstanding principal balance in excess of $5 billion, and


A fee for the clearing and operational services provided by personnel of the Manager equal to $10,000 per month.

The Company is obligated to reimburse the Manager for any direct expenses incurred on its behalf and to pay the Manager the Company'sCompany’s pro rata portion of certain overhead costs set forth in the management agreement. Should the Company terminate the management agreement without cause, it will pay to the Manager a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee, as defined in the management agreement, before or on the last day of the term of the agreement.

22


Total expenses recorded for the management fee, allocated overhead and costs incurredrepurchase agreement trading, clearing and administrative services were approximately $5.4 $3.4 million and $1.9 $3.1 million, for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, March 31, 2023 and approximately $3.9 million and $1.4 million for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2016,2022, respectively. At September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016,2022, the net amount due to affiliates was approximately $0.8 $1.2 million and $0.6 $1.1 million, respectively.


Other Relationships with Bimini


Robert Cauley, ourthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of ourthe Board of Directors, also serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bimini and owns shares of common stock of Bimini. HunterGeorge H. Haas, ourIV, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer, Secretary and a member of ourthe Board of Directors, also serves as the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of Bimini and owns shares of common stock of Bimini. In addition, as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, Bimini owned 1,520,036569,071 shares, or 3.4%1.5%, of the Company'sCompany’s common stock.

22

23

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. The discussion may contain certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are those that are not historical in nature. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.


Common Stock Reverse Split

On August 30, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of its common stock and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock. All share and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse split.

Overview


We are a specialty finance company that invests in residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"(“RMBS”) which are issued and guaranteed by a federally chartered corporation or agency ("(“Agency RMBS"RMBS”). Our investment strategy focuses on, and our portfolio consists of, two categories of Agency RMBS: (i) traditional pass-through Agency RMBS, such as mortgage pass-through certificates issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac" and together with Fannie Mae, the "Enterprises") or the Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae" and, together with the Enterprises the “GSEs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) issued by the GSEs (“PT RMBS"RMBS”) and (ii) structured Agency RMBS, such as collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"), interest-only securities ("IOs"(“IOs”), inverse interest-only securities ("IIOs"(“IIOs”) and principal only securities ("POs"(“POs”), among other types of structured Agency RMBS. We were formed by Bimini in August 2010, commenced operations on November 24, 2010 and completed our initial public offering ("IPO"(“IPO”) on February 20, 2013. We are externally managed by Bimini Advisors, a registeredan investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"“SEC”).


Our business objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total returns over the long term through a combination of capital appreciation and the payment of regular monthly distributions. We intend to achieve this objective by investing in and strategically allocating capital between the two categories of Agency RMBS described above. We seek to generate income from (i) the net interest margin on our leveraged PT RMBS portfolio and the leveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio, and (ii) the interest income we generate from the unleveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio. We intend to fund our PT RMBS and certain of our structured Agency RMBS through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. PT RMBS and structured Agency RMBS typically exhibit materially different sensitivities to movements in interest rates. Declines in the value of one portfolio may be offset by appreciation in the other. The percentage of capital that we allocate to our two Agency RMBS asset categories will vary and will be actively managed in an effort to maintain the level of income generated by the combined portfolios, the stability of that income stream and the stability of the value of the combined portfolios. We believe that this strategy will enhance our liquidity, earnings, book value stability and asset selection opportunities in various interest rate environments.


We operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT")REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").Code. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent that we currently distribute all of our REIT taxable income (as defined in the Code) to our stockholders and maintain our REIT qualification.


The Company'sCompany’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "ORC"“ORC”.


Capital Raising Activities


On JulyOctober 29, 2016,2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the "July 2016“October 2021 Equity Distribution Agreement"Agreement”) with twofour sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000$250,000,000 of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be "at“at the market"market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. We issued a total of 10,174,9929,742,188 shares under the July 2016October 2021 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $110.0approximately $151.8 million, and net proceeds of approximately $108.2$149.3 million, net ofafter commissions and fees, prior to its termination.


termination in March 2023.

23

24

On February 23, 2017,March 7, 2023, we entered into anotheran equity distribution agreement as amended and restated on May 10, 2017, (the "May 2017“March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement"Agreement”) with twothree sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000$250,000,000 of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be "at“at the market"market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. The May 2017No shares have been issued under the March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement replacedthrough March 31, 2023 .

Stock Repurchase Agreement

On July 29, 2015, the July 2016 Equity Distribution Agreement. We issued a totalCompany’s Board of 12,299,032 shares underDirectors authorized the May 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceedsrepurchase of $125.0 million, and net proceeds of approximately $122.9 million, net of commissions and fees, prior to its termination.


On August 2, 2017, we entered into another equity distribution agreement (the "August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement") with two sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000 of400,000 shares of our common stock. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases is determined by the Company in its discretion and is subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The authorization does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be suspended or discontinued at the Company’s discretion without prior notice. On February 8, 2018, the Board of Directors approved an increase in transactions that are deemedthe stock repurchase program for up to be "atan additional 904,564 shares of the market" offerings and privately negotiated transactions.  The August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement replacedCompany’s common stock. Coupled with the May 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement. Through September 30, 2017, we have not issued any156,751 shares remaining from the original 400,000 share authorization, the increased authorization brought the total authorization to 1,061,316 shares, representing 10% of the Company’s then outstanding share count.

On December 9, 2021, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 3,372,399 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement.


stock repurchase program to 3,539,861 shares, representing approximately 10% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock.

On October 12, 2022, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available in the stock repurchase program for up to an additional 4,300,000 shares, bringing the remaining authorization under the stock repurchase program to 6,183,601 shares, representing approximately 18% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock. This stock repurchase program has no termination date.

From the inception of the stock repurchase program through March 31, 2023, the Company repurchased a total of 4,048,613 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $68.8 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $16.99 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2023, the Company repurchased a total of 373,041 shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $4.0 million, including commissions and fees, for a weighted average price of $10.62 per share.

Factors that Affect our Results of Operations and Financial Condition


A variety of industry and economic factors may impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:


·

interest rate trends;

increases in our cost of funds resulting from increases in the Federal Funds rate that are controlled by the Federal Reserve (the "Fed") that occurred in 2022 and the first quarter of 2023, and may continue to occur during 2023;
·

the difference between Agency RMBS yields and our funding and hedging costs;

·

competition for, and supply of, investments in Agency RMBS;

·

actions taken by the newU.S. government, including the presidential administration, the Fed, the Federal ReserveHousing Financing Agency (the "Fed"“FHFA”), The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), Federal Housing Administration (the “FHA”), the Federal Open Market Committee (the “FOMC”) and the U.S. Treasury;

·

prepayment rates on mortgages underlying our Agency RMBS and credit trends insofar as they affect prepayment rates; and

·

other market developments.developments, including bank failures.


In addition, a variety of factors relating to our business may also impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:


·

our degree of leverage;

·

our access to funding and borrowing capacity;

·

our borrowing costs;

·

our hedging activities;

·

the market value of our investments; and

·

the requirements to qualify as a REIT and the requirements to qualify for a registration exemption under the Investment Company Act.

25

Results of Operations


Described below are the Company'sCompany’s results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, as compared to the Company'sCompany’s results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2016.


24


March 31, 2022.

Net Income (Loss) Summary


Net income for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 was $8.0$3.5 million, or $0.21$0.09 per share. Net incomeloss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $22.4 million, or $0.99 per share.  Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2022 was $15.2$148.7 million, or $0.33 per share. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $20.5 million, or $0.85$4.20 per share. The components of net (loss) income for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016,2022, along with the changes in those components are presented in the table below:


(in thousands)                  
  Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended, September 30, 
  2017  2016  Change  2017  2016  Change 
Interest income $105,864  $62,059  $43,805  $38,974  $22,358  $16,616 
Interest expense  (28,116)  (10,629)  (17,487)  (12,638)  (3,979)  (8,659)
Net interest income  77,748   51,430   26,318   26,336   18,379   7,957 
(Losses) gains on RMBS and derivative contracts  (61,578)  (22,446)  (39,132)  (8,254)  4,418   (12,672)
Net portfolio income  16,170   28,984   (12,814)  18,082   22,797   (4,715)
Expenses  (8,181)  (6,587)  (1,594)  (2,899)  (2,271)  (628)
Net income $7,989  $22,397  $(14,408) $15,183  $20,526  $(5,343)

(in thousands)

            
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

  

Change

 

Interest income

 $38,012  $41,857  $(3,845)

Interest expense

  (42,217)  (2,655)  (39,562)

Net interest expense

  (4,205)  39,202   (43,407)

Gains (losses) on RMBS and derivative contracts

  12,739   (183,550)  196,289 

Net portfolio income (loss)

  8,534   (144,348)  152,882 

Expenses

  (5,004)  (4,379)  (625)

Net income (loss)

 $3,530  $(148,727) $152,257 

GAAP and Non-GAAP Reconciliations


In addition to the results presented in accordance with GAAP, our results of operations discussed below include certain non-GAAP financial information, including "Net“Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses"Losses”, "Economic“Economic Interest Expense"Expense” and "Economic“Economic Net Interest Income."


Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses


We have elected to account for our Agency RMBS under the fair value option. Securities held under the fair value option are recorded at estimated fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded as unrealized gains or losses through the consolidated statements of operations.


In addition, we have not elected to designatedesignated our derivative holdingsfinancial instruments used for hedgehedging purposes as hedges for accounting treatment under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging.purposes, but rather hold them for economic hedging purposes. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in the Company's consolidatedCompany’s statements of operations and are not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.


Presenting net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses allows management to: (i) isolate the net interest income and other expenses of the Company over time, free of all mark-to-marketfair value adjustments and (ii) assess the effectiveness of our funding and hedging strategies on our capital allocation decisions and our asset allocation performance. Our funding and hedging strategies, capital allocation and asset selection are integral to our risk management strategy, and therefore critical to the management of our portfolio. We believe that the presentation of our net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains is useful to investors because it provides a means of comparing our results of operations to those of our peers who have not elected the same accounting treatment. Our presentation of net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures of other companies, who may use different calculations. As a result, net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains and losses should not be considered as a substitute for our GAAP net income (loss) as a measure of our financial performance or any measure of our liquidity under GAAP. The table below presents a reconciliation of our net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and net earnings excluding realized and unrealized gains.gains and losses.

Described below are the Company’s results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2023, and for each quarter in 2022.

26



Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses 
(in thousands, except per share data)                  
           Per Share 
        Net Earnings        Net Earnings 
        Excluding        Excluding 
     Realized and  Realized and     Realized and  Realized and 
  Net  Unrealized  Unrealized  Net  Unrealized  Unrealized 
  Income  Gains and  Gains and  Income  Gains and  Gains and 
  (GAAP)  
Losses(1)
  Losses  (GAAP)  Losses  Losses 
Three Months Ended                  
September 30, 2017 $15,183  $(8,254) $23,437  $0.33  $(0.18) $0.52 
June 30, 2017  (9,643)  (32,597)  22,954   (0.26)  (0.88)  0.62 
March 31, 2017  2,449   (20,727)  23,176   0.07   (0.63)  0.70 
December 31, 2016  (20,419)  (38,003)  17,584   (0.72)  (1.33)  0.62 
September 30, 2016  20,526   4,418   16,108   0.85   0.18   0.67 
June 30, 2016  6,463   (7,319)  13,782   0.29   (0.33)  0.63 
March 31, 2016  (4,591)  (19,561)  14,970   (0.21)  (0.90)  0.69 
Nine Months Ended                        
September 30, 2017 $7,989  $(61,578) $69,567  $0.21  $(1.59) $1.80 
September 30, 2016  22,397��  (22,460)  44,857   0.99   (0.99)  1.98 

Net Earnings Excluding Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

                        
              

Per Share

 
          

Net Earnings

          

Net Earnings

 
          

Excluding

          

Excluding

 
      

Realized and

  

Realized and

      

Realized and

  

Realized and

 
  

Net

  

Unrealized

  

Unrealized

  

Net

  

Unrealized

  

Unrealized

 
  

Income

  

Gains and

  

Gains and

  

Income

  

Gains and

  

Gains and

 
  

(GAAP)

  

Losses(1)

  

Losses

  

(GAAP)

  

Losses

  

Losses

 

Three Months Ended

                        

March 31, 2023

 $3,530  $12,739  $(9,209) $0.09  $0.33  $(0.24)

December 31, 2022

  34,926   36,727   (1,801)  0.95   1.00   (0.05)

September 30, 2022

  (84,513)  (94,433)  9,920   (2.40)  (2.68)  0.28 

June 30, 2022

  (60,139)  (82,673)  22,534   (1.70)  (2.33)  0.63 

March 31, 2022

  (148,727)  (183,550)  34,823   (4.20)  (5.19)  0.99 

(1)

Includes realized and unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS and derivative financial instruments.instruments, including net interest income or expense on interest rate swaps.


Prior to 2023, we included certain expenses related to our derivative instruments in 'Direct REIT operating expenses' in the statements of operations.  Beginning in 2023, we have included these expenses in 'Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging instruments.'  Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.  The table below presents the effect of this reclassification for each quarter in 2022.

Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses - Reclassification of Derivative Transaction Expenses

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

                        
              

Net Earnings Excluding

 
  

Realized and Unrealized

  

Realized and Unrealized

 
  

Gains and Losses

  

Gains and Losses

 
  

Prior

  

Reclassified

  

Current

  

Prior

  

Reclassified

  

Current

 
  

Presentation

  

Expenses

  

Presentation

  

Presentation

  

Expenses

  

Presentation

 

Three Months Ended

                        

December 31, 2022

 $38,389  $(1,662) $36,727  $(3,463) $(1,662) $(1,801)

September 30, 2022

  (93,544)  (889)  (94,433)  9,031   (889)  9,920 

June 30, 2022

  (82,282)  (391)  (82,673)  22,143   (391)  22,534 

March 31, 2022

  (183,232)  (318)  (183,550)  34,505   (318)  34,823 
  

Per Share

 

Three Months Ended

                        

December 31, 2022

 $1.04  $(0.04) $1.00  $(0.09) $(0.04) $(0.05)

September 30, 2022

  (2.66)  (0.02)  (2.68)  0.26   (0.02)  0.28 

June 30, 2022

  (2.32)  (0.01)  (2.33)  0.62   (0.01)  0.63 

March 31, 2022

  (5.18)  (0.01)  (5.19)  0.98   (0.01)  0.99 

Economic Interest Expense and Economic Net Interest Income


We use derivative and other hedging instruments, specifically EurodollarFed Funds and Treasury Note ("T-Note")T-Note futures contracts, short positions in U.S. Treasury securities, interest rate swaps and swaptions, to hedge a portion of the interest rate risk on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment.


We have not elected to designate our derivative holdings for hedge accounting treatment under the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (the "FASB"), Accounting Standards Codification, ("ASC"), Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging.treatment. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in our consolidated statements of operations and not included in interest expense. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the derivative instruments.

27

For the purpose of computing economic net interest income and ratios relating to cost of funds measures, GAAP interest expense has been adjusted to reflect the realized and unrealized gains or losses on specificcertain derivative instruments the Company uses, specifically Eurodollar, Fed Funds and U.S. Treasury futures, and interest rate swaps and swaptions, that pertain to each period presented. We believe that adjusting our interest expense for the periods presented by the gains or losses on allthese derivative instruments would not accurately reflect our economic interest expense for these periods. The reason is that these derivative instruments may cover periods that extend into the future, not just the current period. Any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the instruments reflect the change in market value of the instrument caused by changes in underlying interest rates applicable to the term covered by the instrument, not just the current period. For each period presented, we have combined the effects of the derivative financial instruments in place for the respective period with the actual interest expense incurred on borrowings to reflect total economic interest expense for the applicable period. Interest expense, including the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic interest expense. Net interest income, when calculated to include the effect of derivative instruments for the period, is referred to as economic net interest income. This presentation includes gains or losses on all contracts in effect during the reporting period, covering the current period as well as periods in the future.

From time to time, we invest in TBAs, which are forward contracts for the purchase or sale of Agency RMBS at a predetermined price, face amount, issuer, coupon and stated maturity on an agreed-upon future date. The specific Agency RMBS to be delivered into the contract are not known until shortly before the settlement date. We may choose, prior to settlement, to move the settlement of these securities out to a later date by entering into a dollar roll transaction. The Agency RMBS purchased or sold for a forward settlement date are typically priced at a discount to equivalent securities settling in the current month. Consequently, forward purchases of Agency RMBS and dollar roll transactions represent a form of off-balance sheet financing. These TBAs are accounted for as derivatives and marked to market through the income statement. Gains or losses on TBAs are included with gains or losses on other derivative contracts and are not included in interest income for purposes of the discussions below.

We believe that economic interest expense and economic net interest income provide meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help management to evaluate its financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio or operations. The unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments presented in our consolidated statements of operations are not necessarily representative of the total interest rate expense that we will ultimately realize. This is because as interest rates move up or down in the future, the gains or losses we ultimately realize, and which will affect our total interest rate expense in future periods, may differ from the unrealized gains or losses recognized as of the reporting date.

26

Our presentation of the economic value of our hedging strategy has important limitations. First, other market participants may calculate economic interest expense and economic net interest income differently than the way we calculate them. Second, while we believe that the calculation of the economic value of our hedging strategy described above helps to present our financial position and performance, it may be of limited usefulness as an analytical tool. Therefore, the economic value of our investment strategy should not be viewed in isolation and is not a substitute for interest expense and net interest income computed in accordance with GAAP.


The tables below present a reconciliation of the adjustments to interest expense shown for each period relative to our derivative instruments, and the income statement line item, gains (losses) on derivative instruments, calculated in accordance with GAAP for each quarter during 2017of 2023 to date and 2016.2022.

Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments

 

(in thousands)

                    
              

Funding Hedges

 
  

Recognized in

  

TBA Securities

  

Attributed to

  

Attributed to

 
  

Income

  

Gain (Loss)

  

Current

  

Future

 
  Statement  (Short  (Long  Period  Periods 
  

(GAAP)

  

Positions)

  

Positions)

  

(Non-GAAP)

  

(Non-GAAP)

 

Three Months Ended

                    

March 31, 2023

 $(41,156) $(5,990) $-  $19,211  $(54,377)

December 31, 2022

  (12,319)  (9,700)  -   9,414   (12,033)

September 30, 2022

  183,930   10,642   106   4,154   169,028 

June 30, 2022

  103,367   1,013   1,067   1,605   99,682 

March 31, 2022

  177,498   2,539   27   (1,605)  176,537 

28


Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments 
(in thousands)            
        Funding Hedges 
  Recognized in     Attributed to  Attributed to 
  Income  TBA  Current  Future 
  Statement  Securities  Period  Periods 
  (GAAP)  Income  (Non-GAAP)  (Non-GAAP) 
Three Months Ended            
September 30, 2017 $(5,470) $(1,459) $(3,754) $(257)
June 30, 2017  (19,442)  (2,384)  (3,654)  (13,404)
March 31, 2017  (4,419)  -   (3,193)  (1,226)
December 31, 2016  23,207   (133)  (2,967)  26,307 
September 30, 2016  6,587   (474)  (2,660)  9,721 
June 30, 2016  (11,591)  (786)  (2,210)  (8,595)
March 31, 2016  (27,590)  (1,125)  (1,933)  (24,532)
Nine Months Ended                
September 30, 2017 $(29,331) $(3,843) $(10,601) $(14,887)
September 30, 2016  (32,594)  (2,385)  (6,803)  (23,406)

Economic Interest Expense and Economic Net Interest Income 
(in thousands)                  
     Interest Expense on Borrowings       
        Gains       
        (Losses) on          
        Derivative          
        Instruments     Net Interest Income 
     GAAP  Attributed  Economic  GAAP  Economic 
  Interest  Interest  to Current  Interest  Net Interest  Net Interest 
  Income  Expense  
Period(1)
  
Expense(2)
  Income  
Income(3)
 
Three Months Ended                  
September 30, 2017 $38,974  $12,638  $(3,754) $16,392  $26,336  $22,582 
June 30, 2017  34,579   8,763   (3,654)  12,417   25,816   22,162 
March 31, 2017  32,311   6,715   (3,193)  9,908   25,596   22,403 
December 31, 2016  25,068   4,976   (2,967)  7,943   20,092   17,125 
September 30, 2016  22,358   3,979   (2,660)  6,639   18,379   15,719 
June 30, 2016  19,235   3,330   (2,210)  5,540   15,905   13,695 
March 31, 2016  20,466   3,319   (1,933)  5,252   17,147   15,214 
Nine Months Ended                        
September 30, 2017 $105,864  $28,116  $(10,601) $38,717  $77,748  $67,147 
September 30, 2016  62,059   10,629   (6,803)  17,431   51,430   44,628 

The table below presents the effect of the reclassification of derivative expenses discussed above for each quarter in 2022.

Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments - Reclassification of Derivative Transaction Expenses

     

(in thousands)

                        
  

Recognized in Income Statement

  

Attributed to Current Period

 
  

Prior

  

Reclassified

  

Current

  

Prior

  

Reclassified

  

Current

 
  

Presentation

  

Expenses

  

Presentation

  

Presentation

  

Expenses

  

Presentation

 

Three Months Ended

                        

December 31, 2022

 $(10,657) $1,662  $(12,319) $11,076  $1,662  $9,414 

September 30, 2022

  184,819   889   183,930   5,043   889   4,154 

June 30, 2022

  103,758   391   103,367   1,996   391   1,605 

March 31, 2022

  177,816   318   177,498   (1,287)  318   (1,605)

Economic Interest Expense and Economic Net Interest Income

 

(in thousands)

                        
      

Interest Expense on Borrowings

         
          

Gains

             
          

(Losses) on

             
          

Derivative

             
          

Instruments

      

Net Interest Income

 
      

GAAP

  

Attributed

  

Economic

  

GAAP

  

Economic

 
  

Interest

  

Interest

  

to Current

  

Interest

  

Net Interest

  

Net Interest

 
  

Income

  

Expense

  

Period(1)

  

Expense(2)

  

Income

  

Income(3)

 

Three Months Ended

                        

March 31, 2023

 $38,012  $42,217  $19,211  $23,006  $(4,205) $15,006 

December 31, 2022

  31,897   29,512   9,414   20,098   2,385   11,799 

September 30, 2022

  35,611   21,361   4,154   17,207   14,250   18,404 

June 30, 2022

  35,268   8,180   1,605   6,575   27,088   28,693 

March 31, 2022

  41,857   2,655   (1,605)  4,260   39,202   37,597 

(1)

Reflects the effect of derivative instrument hedges for only the period presented.

(2)

Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP interest expense.

(3)

Calculated by adding the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period presented to GAAP net interest income.

27

Net Interest Income


During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we generated $77.7 million ofa net interest income,loss of $4.2 million consisting of $105.9$38.0 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $28.1$42.2 million of interest expense on borrowings. For the comparable period ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2022, we generated $51.4$39.2 million of net interest income, consisting of $62.1$41.9 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $10.6$2.7 million of interest expense on borrowings. The $43.8$3.9 million increasedecrease in interest income and $17.5was due to a $1,775.9 milliondecrease in average RMBS, which was partially offset by a 101 basis point ("bps") increase in the yield on average RMBS. The $39.6 millionincrease in interest expense forwas due to a 452 bps increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily reflects the growthaverage cost of our portfolio fueledfunds, partially offset by our net capital raising activities, combined with increased yields earned on our portfolio and increased costs and amounts of oura $1,780.2 milliondecrease in average outstanding borrowings.


On an economic basis, our interest expense on borrowings for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 20162022 was $38.7$23.0 million and $17.4$4.3 million, respectively, resulting in $67.1$15.0 million and $44.6$37.6 million of economic net interest income, respectively.


During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we generated $26.3 million of net interest income, consisting of $39.0 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $12.6 million of interest expense on borrowings.  For the three months ended September 30, 2016, we generated $18.4 million of net interest income, consisting of $22.4 million of interest income from RMBS assets offset by $4.0 million of interest expense on borrowings.  As in the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the increased interest income and interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, reflects a combination of the growth of our portfolio and increased yields on the portfolio and costs of borrowings.

On an economic basis, our interest expense on repurchase liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $16.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively, resulting in $22.6 million and $15.7 million of economic net interest income, respectively.

The tables below provide information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average borrowings, interest expense, cost of funds, net interest income and net interest spread for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016March 31, 2023 and each quarter during 2017 and 2016of 2022 on both a GAAP and economic basis.


($ in thousands)                        
  Average     Yield on     Interest Expense  Average Cost of Funds 
  RMBS  Interest  Average  Average  GAAP  Economic  GAAP  Economic 
  
Held(1)
  Income  RMBS  
Borrowings(1)
  Basis  
Basis(2)
  Basis  
Basis(3)
 
Three Months Ended 
September 30, 2017 $3,834,083  $38,974   4.07% $3,494,266  $12,638  $16,392   1.45%  1.88%
June 30, 2017  3,499,922   34,579   3.95%  3,164,532   8,763   12,417   1.11%  1.57%
March 31, 2017  3,142,095   32,311   4.11%  2,922,157   6,715   9,908   0.92%  1.36%
December 31, 2016  2,761,836   25,068   3.63%  2,545,901   4,974   7,943   0.78%  1.25%
September 30, 2016  2,362,377   22,358   3.79%  2,179,462   3,979   6,639   0.73%  1.22%
June 30, 2016  2,100,151   19,235   3.66%  2,000,158   3,330   5,540   0.67%  1.11%
March 31, 2016  2,067,527   20,466   3.96%  1,962,901   3,319   5,252   0.68%  1.07%
Nine Months Ended 
September 30, 2017 $3,492,033  $105,864   4.04% $3,193,652  $28,116  $38,717   1.17%  1.62%
September 30, 2016  2,176,685   62,059   3.80%  2,047,507   10,629   17,431   0.69%  1.14%

28

29


($ in thousands)            
  Net Interest Income  Net Interest Spread 
  GAAP  Economic  GAAP  Economic 
  Basis  
Basis(2)
  Basis  
Basis(4)
 
Three Months Ended 
September 30, 2017 $26,336  $22,582   2.62%  2.19%
June 30, 2017  25,816   22,162   2.84%  2.38%
March 31, 2017  25,596   22,403   3.19%  2.75%
December 31, 2016  20,092   17,125   2.85%  2.38%
September 30, 2016  18,379   15,719   3.06%  2.57%
June 30, 2016  15,905   13,695   2.99%  2.55%
March 31, 2016  17,147   15,214   3.28%  2.89%
Nine Months Ended 
September 30, 2017 $77,748  $67,147   2.87%  2.42%
September 30, 2016  51,430   44,628   3.11%  2.66%

($ in thousands)

                                
  

Average

      

Yield on

      

Interest Expense

  

Average Cost of Funds

 
  

RMBS

  

Interest

  

Average

  

Average

  

GAAP

  

Economic

  

GAAP

  

Economic

 
  

Held(1)

  

Income

  

RMBS

  

Borrowings(1)

  

Basis

  

Basis(2)

  

Basis

  

Basis(3)

 

Three Months Ended

                                

March 31, 2023

 $3,769,954  $38,012   4.03% $3,573,941  $42,217  $23,006   4.72%  2.57%

December 31, 2022

  3,370,608   31,897   3.79%  3,256,153   29,512   20,098   3.63%  2.47%

September 30, 2022

  3,571,037   35,611   3.99%  3,446,420   21,361   17,207   2.48%  2.00%

June 30, 2022

  4,260,727   35,268   3.31%  4,111,544   8,180   6,575   0.80%  0.64%

March 31, 2022

  5,545,844   41,857   3.02%  5,354,107   2,655   4,260   0.20%  0.32%

($ in thousands)

                
  

Net Interest Income

  

Net Interest Spread

 
  

GAAP

  

Economic

  

GAAP

  

Economic

 
  

Basis

  

Basis(2)

  

Basis

  

Basis(4)

 

Three Months Ended

                

March 31, 2023

 $(4,205) $15,006   (0.69)%  1.46%

December 31, 2022

  2,385   11,799   0.16%  1.32%

September 30, 2022

  14,250   18,404   1.51%  1.99%

June 30, 2022

  27,088   28,693   2.51%  2.67%

March 31, 2022

  39,202   37,597   2.82%  2.70%

(1)

Portfolio yields and costs of borrowings presented in the tables above and the tables on pages 30 and 31 arepages 30-31 are calculated based on the average balances of the underlying investment portfolio/borrowings balances and are annualized for the periods presented. Average balances for quarterly periods are calculated using two data points, the beginning and ending balances.

(2)

Economic interest expense and economic net interest income presented in the table above and the tables on page 31 includes the effect of our derivative instrument hedges for only the periods presented.

(3)

Represents interest cost of our borrowings and the effect of derivative instrument hedges attributed to the period divided by average RMBS.

(4)

Economic net interest spread is calculated by subtracting average economic cost of funds from realized yield on average RMBS.


Interest Income and Average Asset Yield


Our interest income for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 20162022 was $105.9$38.0 million and $62.1$41.9 million, respectively. We had average RMBS holdings of $3,492.0$3,770.0 million and $2,176.7$5,545.8 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016,2022, respectively. The yield on our portfolio was 4.04%4.03% and 3.80% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, there was a $43.8 million increase in interest income due to a $1,315.3 million increase in average RMBS, combined with a 24 basis point ("bps") increase in the yield on average RMBS.  The increase in average RMBS during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflects the deployment of the proceeds of our net capital raising activities, on a leveraged basis.


Our interest income3.02% for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016 was $39.0 million and $22.4 million, respectively.  We had average RMBS holdings of $3,834.1 million and $2,362.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The yield on our portfolio was 4.07% and 3.79% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2022, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2022, there was a $16.6$3.9 million increasedecrease in interest income due to a $1,471.7the $1,775.9 million increasedecrease in average RMBS combined with a 28that was partially offset by the 101 bps increase in the yield on average RMBS.  The increase in average RMBS during the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016, reflects the deployment of the proceeds of our net capital raising activities.

29


The table below presents the average portfolio size, income and yields of our respective sub-portfolios, consisting of structured RMBS and PT RMBS, for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016, and for each quarter during 2017 and 2016.


($ in thousands)                           
  Average RMBS Held  Interest Income  Realized Yield on Average RMBS 
  PT  Structured     PT  Structured     PT  Structured    
  RMBS  RMBS  Total  RMBS  RMBS  Total  RMBS  RMBS  Total 
Three Months Ended 
September 30, 2017 $3,687,533  $146,550  $3,834,083  $38,476  $498  $38,974   4.17%  1.36%  4.07%
June 30, 2017  3,349,042   150,880   3,499,922   32,479   2,100   34,579   3.88%  5.57%  3.95%
March 31, 2017  2,990,937   151,158   3,142,095   29,772   2,539   32,311   3.98%  6.72%  4.11%
December 31, 2016  2,628,967   132,869   2,761,836   23,647   1,421   25,068   3.60%  4.28%  3.63%
September 30, 2016  2,257,480   104,897   2,362,377   21,898   460   22,358   3.88%  1.75%  3.79%
June 30, 2016  2,006,392   93,759   2,100,151   19,072   163   19,235   3.80%  0.70%  3.66%
March 31, 2016  1,968,690   98,837   2,067,527   19,682   784   20,466   4.00%  3.17%  3.96%
Nine Months Ended 
September 30, 2017 $3,342,504  $149,529  $3,492,033  $100,727  $5,137  $105,864   4.02%  4.58%  4.04%
September 30, 2016  2,077,521   99,164   2,176,685   60,652   1,407   62,059   3.89%  1.89%  3.80%

of 2022.

($ in thousands)

                                    
  

Average RMBS Held

  

Interest Income

  

Realized Yield on Average RMBS

 
  

PT

  

Structured

      

PT

  

Structured

      

PT

  

Structured

     
  

RMBS

  

RMBS

  

Total

  

RMBS

  

RMBS

  

Total

  

RMBS

  

RMBS

  

Total

 

Three Months Ended

                                    

March 31, 2023

 $3,750,184  $19,770  $3,769,954  $37,594  $418  $38,012   4.01%  8.44%  4.03%

December 31, 2022

  3,335,154   35,454   3,370,608   31,204   693   31,897   3.74%  7.83%  3.79%

September 30, 2022

  3,458,277   112,760   3,571,037   32,297   3,314   35,611   3.74%  11.75%  3.99%

June 30, 2022

  4,069,334   191,393   4,260,727   31,894   3,374   35,268   3.14%  7.05%  3.31%

March 31, 2022

  5,335,353   210,491   5,545,844   40,066   1,791   41,857   3.00%  3.40%  3.02%

Interest Expense and the Cost of Funds


We had average outstanding borrowings of $3,193.7$3,573.9 million and $2,047.5$5,354.1 million and total interest expense of $28.1$42.2 million and $10.6$2.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016,2022, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 1.17%4.72% for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, compared to 0.69%0.20% for the comparable period in 2016.  There2022. The $39.6 million increase in interest expense was a $1,146.1due to the 452 bps increase in the average cost of funds, partially offset by the $1,780.2 million increasedecrease in average outstanding borrowings during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023, as compared to the ninethree months ended September March 31, 2022.

30 2016.  The higher cost

Our economic interest expense was $38.7$23.0 million and $17.4$4.3 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016,2022, respectively. There was a 48225 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 1.62% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from 1.14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.  The increase in economic interest expense was due to the increase in average outstanding borrowings during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, combined with the negative performance of our derivative agreements attributed to the current period.


We had average outstanding borrowings of $3,494.3 million and $2,179.5 million and total interest expense of $12.6 million and $4.0 million2.57% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our average cost of funds was 1.45% and 0.73% for three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  There was a 72 bps increase in the average cost of funds and a $1,314.8 million increase in average outstanding borrowings during the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.  As in the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the higher cost of fundsMarch 31, 2023, from 0.32% for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, reflects higher short-term rates, and the increase in average outstanding borrowings reflects the investment, on a leveraged basis, of the proceeds of our net capital raising activities.

Our economic interest expense was $16.4 million and $6.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There was a 66 bps increase in the average economic cost of funds to 1.88% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from 1.22% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in economic interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2017 was due to a combination of the increase in average outstanding borrowings, higher average interest rates charged for those borrowings, and the negative performance of our derivative agreements attributed to the current period.

30


March 31, 2022.

Since all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates directly affect our interest expense. Our average cost of funds calculated on a GAAP basis was 259 bps above the one-month average one-month LIBORSOFR and 063 bps belowabove the six-month average six-month LIBORSOFR for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023. Our average economic cost of funds was 68206 bps abovebelow the one-month average one-month LIBORSOFR and 43152 bps abovebelow the six-month average six-month LIBORSOFR for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements increased to 59was 30 days at September 30, 2017 from 15March 31, 2023 and 27 days at December 31, 2016.


2022.

The tables below present the average balance of repurchase agreementsborrowings outstanding, interest expense and average cost of funds, and average one-month and six-month LIBORSOFR rates for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,March 31, 2023 and for each quarter in 2017 and 20162022, on both a GAAP and economic basis.


($ in thousands)               
  Average  Interest Expense  Average Cost of Funds 
  Balance of  GAAP  Economic  GAAP  Economic 
  Borrowings  Basis  Basis  Basis  Basis 
Three Months Ended               
September 30, 2017 $3,494,266  $12,638  $16,392   1.45%  1.88%
June 30, 2017  3,164,532   8,763   12,417   1.11%  1.57%
March 31, 2017  2,922,157   6,715   9,908   0.92%  1.36%
December 31, 2016  2,545,901   4,974   7,943   0.78%  1.25%
September 30, 2016  2,179,462   3,979   6,639   0.73%  1.22%
June 30, 2016  2,000,158   3,330   5,540   0.67%  1.11%
March 31, 2016  1,962,901   3,319   5,252   0.68%  1.07%
Nine Months Ended                    
September 30, 2017 $3,193,652  $28,116  $38,717   1.17%  1.62%
September 30, 2016  2,047,507   10,628   17,431   0.69%  1.14%

        Average GAAP Cost of Funds  Average Economic Cost of Funds 
        Relative to Average  Relative to Average 
  Average LIBOR  One-Month  Six-Month  One-Month  Six-Month 
  One-Month  Six-Month  LIBOR  LIBOR  LIBOR  LIBOR 
Three Months Ended                  
September 30, 2017  1.20%  1.45%  0.25%  (0.00)%  0.68%  0.43%
June 30, 2017  1.05%  1.43%  0.06%  (0.32)%  0.52%  0.14%
March 31, 2017  0.82%  1.37%  0.10%  (0.45)%  0.54%  (0.01)%
December 31, 2016  0.62%  1.28%  0.16%  (0.50)%  0.63%  (0.03)%
September 30, 2016  0.49%  1.09%  0.24%  (0.36)%  0.73%  0.13%
June 30, 2016  0.44%  0.92%  0.23%  (0.25)%  0.67%  0.19%
March 31, 2016  0.40%  0.84%  0.28%  (0.16)%  0.67%  0.23%
Nine Months Ended                        
September 30, 2017  1.03%  1.42%  0.14%  (0.25)%  0.59%  0.20%
September 30, 2016  0.44%  0.95%  0.25%  (0.26)%  0.70%  0.19%

31


($ in thousands)

                    
  

Average

  

Interest Expense

  

Average Cost of Funds

 
  

Balance of

  

GAAP

  

Economic

  

GAAP

  

Economic

 
  

Borrowings

  

Basis

  

Basis

  

Basis

  

Basis

 

Three Months Ended

                    

March 31, 2023

 $3,573,941  $42,217  $23,006   4.72%  2.57%

December 31, 2022

  3,256,153   29,512   20,098   3.63%  2.47%

September 30, 2022

  3,446,420   21,361   17,207   2.48%  2.00%

June 30, 2022

  4,111,544   8,180   6,575   0.80%  0.64%

March 31, 2022

  5,354,107   2,655   4,260   0.20%  0.32%

          

Average GAAP Cost of Funds

  

Average Economic Cost of Funds

 
          

Relative to Average

  

Relative to Average

 
  

Average SOFR

  

One-Month

  

Six-Month

  

One-Month

  

Six-Month

 
  

One-Month

  

Six-Month

  

SOFR

  

SOFR

  

SOFR

  

SOFR

 

Three Months Ended

                        

March 31, 2023

  4.63%  4.09%  0.09%  0.63%  (2.06)%  (1.52)%

December 31, 2022

  4.06%  2.89%  (0.43)%  0.74%  (1.59)%  (0.42)%

September 30, 2022

  2.47%  1.43%  0.01%  1.05%  (0.47)%  0.57%

June 30, 2022

  1.09%  0.39%  (0.29)%  0.41%  (0.45)%  0.25%

March 31, 2022

  0.16%  0.07%  0.04%  0.13%  0.16%  0.25%

Gains or Losses


The table below presents our gains or losses for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016.2022.

(in thousands)

            
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

  

Change

 

Realized losses on sales of RMBS

 $-  $(51,086) $51,086 

Unrealized gains (losses) on RMBS and U.S. Treasury Notes

  53,895   (309,962)  363,857 

Total gains (losses) on RMBS and U.S. Treasury Notes

  53,895   (361,048)  414,943 

(Losses) gains on interest rate futures

  (4,038)  79,691   (83,729)

(Losses) gains on interest rate swaps

  (26,144)  66,170   (92,314)

Gains (losses) on payer swaptions (short positions)

  6,585   (10,908)  17,493 

(Losses) gains on payer swaptions (long positions)

  (12,109)  40,975   (53,084)

Losses on interest rate caps

  (645)  (996)  351 

Gains (losses) on interest rate floors

  1,185   -   1,185 

(Losses) gains on TBA securities (short positions)

  (5,990)  2,539   (8,529)

(Losses) gains on TBA securities (long positions)

  -   27   (27)

Total (losses) gains from derivative instruments

 $(41,156) $177,498  $(218,654)

31

(in thousands)                  
  Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  Change  2017  2016  Change 
Realized gains on sales of RMBS $3,354  $4,482  $(1,128) $769  $229  $540 
Unrealized (losses) gains on RMBS  (35,601)  5,652   (41,253)  (3,553)  (2,398)  (1,155)
Total (losses) gains on RMBS  (32,247)  10,134   (42,381)  (2,784)  (2,169)  (615)
Losses on interest rate futures  (23,145)  (29,795)  6,650   (5,843)  2,882   (8,725)
Losses on interest rate swaps  (3,170)  (450)  (2,720)  1,005   4,179   (3,174)
Gains on receiver swaptions  827   36   791   827   -   827 
Losses on TBA securities  (3,843)  (2,385)  (1,458)  (1,459)  (474)  (985)


We invest in RMBS with the intent to earn net income from the realized yield on those assets over their related funding and hedging costs, and not for purposesthe purpose of making short term gains from sales. However, we have sold, and may continue to sell, existing assets to acquire new assets, which our management believes might have higher risk-adjusted returns in light of current or anticipated interest rates, federal government programs or general economic conditions or to manage our balance sheet as part of our asset/liability management strategy. During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,March 31, 2022, we received proceeds of $3,891.0$1,413.0 million and $1,717.6 million, respectively, from the sales of RMBS.  DuringWe did not sell any RMBS during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we received proceeds of $826.0 million and $418.2 million, respectively, from the sales of RMBS, including sales settling in subsequent periods.


March 31, 2023. 

Realized and unrealized gains and losses on RMBS are driven in part by changes in yields and interest rates, the spreads that Agency RMBS trade relative to comparable duration U.S. Treasuries or swaps, as well as varying levels of demand for RMBS, which affect the pricing of the securities in our portfolio. The unrealized gains and losses on RMBS may also include the premium lost as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, decreasing unrealized gains or increasing unrealized losses as prepayment speeds or premiums increase. To the extent RMBS are carried at a discount to par, unrealized gains or losses on RMBS would also include discount accreted as a result of prepayments on the underlying mortgages, increasing unrealized gains or decreasing unrealized losses as speeds on discounts increase. Gains and losses on interest rate futures contracts are affected by changes in implied forward rates during the reporting period. The table below presents historical interest rate data for each quarter end during 20172023 to date and 2016.


        15 Year  30 Year  Three 
  5 Year  10 Year  Fixed-Rate  Fixed-Rate  Month 
  
Treasury Rate(1)
  
Treasury Rate(1)
  
Mortgage Rate(2)
  
Mortgage Rate(2)
  
LIBOR(3)
 
September 30, 2017  1.93%  2.33%  3.11%  3.81%  1.32%
June 30, 2017  1.88%  2.30%  3.17%  3.90%  1.26%
March 31, 2017  1.93%  2.40%  3.41%  4.20%  1.13%
December 31, 2016  1.93%  2.45%  3.43%  4.20%  0.98%
September 30, 2016  1.16%  1.61%  2.76%  3.46%  0.85%
June 30, 2016  1.01%  1.49%  2.84%  3.57%  0.65%
March 31, 2016  1.22%  1.79%  2.97%  3.69%  0.63%

2022.

  

5 Year

  

10 Year

  

15 Year

  

30 Year

  

90 Day

 
  

U.S. Treasury

  

U.S. Treasury

  

Fixed-Rate

  

Fixed-Rate

  

Average

 
  

Rate(1)

  

Rate(1)

  

Mortgage Rate(2)

  

Mortgage Rate(2)

  

SOFR(3)

 

March 31, 2023

  3.61%  3.49%  5.56%  6.32%  4.51%

December 31, 2022

  4.00%  3.88%  5.68%  6.42%  3.62%

September 30, 2022

  4.04%  3.80%  5.35%  6.11%  3.45%

June 30, 2022

  3.00%  2.97%  4.65%  5.52%  1.97%

March 31, 2022

  2.42%  2.33%  3.39%  4.17%  0.84%

(1)

Historical 5 and 10 Year U.S. Treasury Rates are obtained from quoted end of day prices on the Chicago Board Options Exchange.

(2)

Historical 30 Year and 15 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage Rates are obtained from Freddie Mac'sMac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey.

(3)

Historical LIBOR areSOFR is obtained from the Intercontinental Exchange Benchmark Administration Ltd.Federal Reserve Bank of New York.


32


Expenses


For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, the Company'sCompany’s total operating expenses were approximately $8.2$5.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, compared to approximately $6.6$4.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2022. The table below presents a breakdown of operating expenses for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016.


(in thousands)                  
  Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  Change  2017  2016  Change 
Management fees $4,230  $2,968  $1,262  $1,528  $1,052  $476 
Overhead allocation  1,168   963   205   412   336   76 
Accrued incentive compensation  439   598   (159)  209   212   (3)
Directors fees and liability insurance  722   763   (41)  215   236   (21)
Audit, legal and other professional fees  547   654   (107)  157   193   (36)
Direct REIT operating expenses  816   426   390   320   187   133 
Other administrative  259   215   44   58   55   3 
Total expenses $8,181  $6,587  $1,594  $2,899  $2,271  $628 

2022.

(in thousands)

            
  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

  

Change

 

Management fees

 $2,642  $2,634  $8 

Overhead allocation

  576   441   135 

Accrued incentive compensation

  470   237   233 

Directors fees and liability insurance

  323   311   12 

Audit, legal and other professional fees

  451   304   147 

Direct REIT operating expenses

  165   325   (160)

Other administrative

  377   127   250 

Total expenses

 $5,004  $4,379  $625 

We are externally managed and advised by Bimini Advisors, LLC (the "Manager"“Manager”) pursuant to the terms of a management agreement. The management agreement has been renewed through February 20, 20182024 and provides for automatic one-year extension options thereafter and is subject to certain termination rights. Under the terms of the management agreement, the Manager is responsible for administering the business activities and day-to-day operations of the Company. The Manager receives a monthly management fee in the amount of:


·

One-twelfth of 1.5% of the first $250 million of the Company'sCompany’s month end equity, as defined in the management agreement,

·

One-twelfth of 1.25% of the Company'sCompany’s month end equity that is greater than $250 million and less than or equal to $500 million, and

·

One-twelfth of 1.00% of the Company'sCompany’s month end equity that is greater than $500 million.

32

The Company is obligated to reimburse Bimini Advisorsthe Manager for any direct expenses incurred on its behalf.  In addition, beginning July 1, 2014, Bimini Advisors began allocatingbehalf and to us itspay the Manager the Company’s pro rata portion of certain overhead costs set forth in accordance with the management agreement.

On April 1, 2022, pursuant to the third amendment to the management agreement entered into on November 16, 2021, the Manager began providing certain repurchase agreement trading, clearing and administrative services to the Company that had been previously provided by AVM, L.P. under an agreement terminated on March 31, 2022.  In consideration for such services, the Company will pay the following fees to the Manager:

A daily fee equal to the outstanding principal balance of repurchase agreement funding in place as of the end of such day multiplied by 1.5 basis points for the amount of aggregate outstanding principal balance less than or equal to $5 billion, and multiplied by 1.0 basis point for any amount of aggregate outstanding principal balance in excess of $5 billion, and

A fee for the clearing and operational services provided by personnel of the Manager equal to $10,000 per month.

Should wethe Company terminate the management agreement without cause, weit will pay to the Manager a termination fee equal to three times the average annual management fee, as defined in the management agreement, before or on the last day of the term of the agreement.


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the management fee and overhead allocation expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and for each quarter in 2022.

($ in thousands)

                    
  

Average

  

Average

  

Advisory Services

 
  

Orchid

  

Orchid

  

Management

  

Overhead

     

Three Months Ended

 

MBS

  

Equity

  

Fee

  

Allocation

  

Total

 

March 31, 2023

 $3,769,954  $865,722  $2,642  $576  $3,218 

December 31, 2022

  3,370,608   823,516   2,566   560   3,126 

September 30, 2022

  3,571,037   839,935   2,616   522   3,138 

June 30, 2022

  4,260,727   866,539   2,631   519   3,150 

March 31, 2022

  5,545,844   853,576   2,634   441   3,075 

Financial Condition:


Mortgage-Backed Securities


As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, our RMBS portfolio consisted of $3,930.3$3,999.9 million of Agency RMBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon on assets of 4.34%3.55%. During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we received principal repayments of $248.5$61.0 million compared to $178.5$157.1 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2022. The average three month prepayment speeds for the quarters ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 20162022 were 10.3%4.0% and 11.7%10.7%, respectively.


33


The following table presents the 3-month constant prepayment rate ("CPR"(“CPR”) experienced on our structured and PT RMBS sub-portfolios, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented. CPR is a method of expressing the prepayment rate for a mortgage pool that assumes that a constant fraction of the remaining principal is prepaid each month or year. Specifically, the CPR in the chart below represents the three month prepayment rate of the securities in the respective asset category.  Assets that were not owned for the entire quarter have been excluded from the calculation.  The exclusion

     

Structured

    
  

PT RMBS

  

RMBS

  

Total

 

Three Months Ended

 

Portfolio (%)

  

Portfolio (%)

  

Portfolio (%)

 

March 31, 2023

 3.9  5.7  4.0 

December 31, 2022

 4.9  6.0  5.0 

September 30, 2022

 6.1  10.4  6.5 

June 30, 2022

 8.3  13.7  9.4 

March 31, 2022

 8.1  19.5  10.7 

33


     Structured    
  PT RMBS  RMBS  Total 
Three Months Ended Portfolio (%)  Portfolio (%)  Portfolio (%) 
September 30, 2017  8.3   14.9   10.3 
June 30, 2017  7.0   12.7   9.5 
March 31, 2017  7.5   14.3   9.9 
December 31, 2016  9.7   18.4   12.2 
September 30, 2016  8.9   17.9   11.7 
June 30, 2016  8.4   15.9   11.0 
March 31, 2016  5.5   12.4   8.2 

The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Company'sCompany’s PT RMBS and structured RMBS as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016:


($ in thousands)         
     Weighted Weighted  
   Percentage Average AverageWeightedWeighted
   ofWeightedMaturity CouponAverageAverage
  FairEntireAverageinLongestReset inLifetimePeriodic
Asset Category ValuePortfolioCouponMonthsMaturityMonthsCapCap
September 30, 2017         
Adjustable Rate RMBS$1,7830.0%3.90%2091-Sep-357.8510.05%2.00%
Fixed Rate RMBS 3,740,65895.2%4.37%3411-Sep-47NANANA
Hybrid Adjustable Rate RMBS 42,2011.1%2.55%3041-Aug-4364.077.55%2.00%
Total Mortgage-backed Pass-through 3,784,64296.3%4.35%3411-Sep-47NANANA
Interest-Only Securities 90,5512.3%3.75%26315-Apr-47NANANA
Inverse Interest-Only Securities 55,1471.4%4.43%33015-Jul-47NA5.37%NA
Total Structured RMBS 145,6983.7%4.00%28815-Jul-47NANANA
Total Mortgage Assets$3,930,340100.0%4.34%3391-Sep-47NANANA
December 31, 2016         
Adjustable Rate RMBS$2,0620.1%3.50%2191-Sep-355.6710.05%2.00%
Fixed Rate RMBS 2,826,69493.5%4.21%3251-Dec-46NANANA
Hybrid Adjustable Rate RMBS 45,4591.5%2.55%3131-Aug-4373.087.55%2.00%
Total Mortgage-backed Pass-through 2,874,21595.1%4.19%3241-Dec-46NANANA
Interest-Only Securities 69,7262.3%3.59%23525-Apr-45NANANA
Inverse Interest-Only Securities 78,2332.6%5.40%33825-Dec-46NA6.14%NA
Total Structured RMBS 147,9594.9%4.55%29025-Dec-46NANANA
Total Mortgage Assets$3,022,174100.0%4.20%32325-Dec-46NANANA

34


($ in thousands)            
  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
     Percentage of     Percentage of 
Agency Fair Value  Entire Portfolio  Fair Value  Entire Portfolio 
Fannie Mae $2,580,973   65.7% $2,226,893   73.7%
Freddie Mac  1,342,803   34.2%  785,496   26.0%
Ginnie Mae  6,564   0.1%  9,785   0.3%
Total Portfolio $3,930,340   100.0% $3,022,174   100.0%

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Weighted Average Pass-through Purchase Price $108.23  $108.64 
Weighted Average Structured Purchase Price $14.19  $15.39 
Weighted Average Pass-through Current Price $108.03  $107.14 
Weighted Average Structured Current Price $13.18  $15.49 
Effective Duration (1)
  2.603   4.579 

2022:

($ in thousands)

                 
              

Weighted

  
      

Percentage

      

Average

  
      

of

  

Weighted

  

Maturity

  
  

Fair

  

Entire

  

Average

  

in

 

Longest

Asset Category

 

Value

  

Portfolio

  

Coupon

  

Months

 

Maturity

March 31, 2023

                 

Fixed Rate RMBS

 $3,980,462   99.5%  3.56%  338 

1-Feb-53

Interest-Only Securities

  18,962   0.5%  4.01%  231 

25-Jul-48

Inverse Interest-Only Securities

  482   0.0%  0.00%  283 

15-Jun-42

Total Mortgage Assets

 $3,999,906   100.0%  3.55%  335 

1-Feb-53

December 31, 2022

                 

Fixed Rate RMBS

 $3,519,906   99.4%  3.47%  339 

1-Nov-52

Interest-Only Securities

  19,669   0.6%  4.01%  234 

25-Jul-48

Inverse Interest-Only Securities

  427   0.0%  0.00%  286 

15-Jun-42

Total Mortgage Assets

 $3,540,002   100.0%  3.46%  336 

1-Nov-52

($ in thousands)

                
  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 
      

Percentage of

      

Percentage of

 

Agency

 

Fair Value

  

Entire Portfolio

  

Fair Value

  

Entire Portfolio

 

Fannie Mae

 $2,630,153   65.8% $2,320,960   65.6%

Freddie Mac

  1,369,753   34.2%  1,219,042   34.4%

Total Portfolio

 $3,999,906   100.0% $3,540,002   100.0%

  

March 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

Weighted Average Pass-through Purchase Price

 $105.59  $106.41 

Weighted Average Structured Purchase Price

 $18.74  $18.74 

Weighted Average Pass-through Current Price

 $93.32  $91.46 

Weighted Average Structured Current Price

 $14.02  $14.05 

Effective Duration (1)

  5.500   5.580 

(1)

Effective duration is the approximate percentage change in price for a 100 bps change in rates. An effective duration of 2.6035.500 indicates that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 2.603%5.500% decrease in the value of the RMBS in the Company'sCompany’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023. An effective duration of 4.5795.580 indicates that an interest rate increase of 1.0% would be expected to cause a 4.579%5.580% decrease in the value of the RMBS in the Company'sCompany’s investment portfolio at December 31, 2016.2022. These figures include the structured securities in the portfolio, but do not include the effect of the Company'sCompany’s funding cost hedges. Effective duration quotes for individual investments are obtained from The Yield Book, Inc.


The following table presents a summary of portfolio assets acquired during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and 2016.


($ in thousands)                  
 2017 2016 
  Total Cost  Average Price  Weighted Average Yield  Total Cost  Average Price  Weighted Average Yield 
Pass-through RMBS $5,007,614  $108.16   2.75% $2,204,085  $109.70   2.24%
Structured RMBS  72,331   14.46   6.21%  52,897   18.03   5.46%

2022, including securities purchased during the period that settled after the end of the period, if any.

($ in thousands)

                        
  

2023

  

2022

 
  

Total Cost

  

Average Price

  

Weighted Average Yield

  

Total Cost

  

Average Price

  

Weighted Average Yield

 

Pass-through RMBS

 $467,460  $97.97   4.59% $-  $-   - 

Structured RMBS

  -   -   -   -   -   - 

Borrowings

34

Borrowings

As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we had established borrowing facilities in the repurchase agreement market with a number of commercial banks and other financial institutions and had borrowings in place with 20 of these counterparties. None of these lenders are affiliated with the Company. These borrowings are secured by the Company'sCompany’s RMBS and cash, and bear interest at the prevailing market rates. We believe our established repurchase agreement borrowing facilities provide borrowing capacity in excess of our needs.


As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we had obligations outstanding under the repurchase agreements of approximately $3,710.1$3,769.4 million with a net weighted average borrowing cost of 1.37%4.90%. The remaining maturity of our outstanding repurchase agreement obligations ranged from 23 to 318154 days, with a weighted average remaining maturity of 5930 days. Securing the repurchase agreement obligations as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 are RMBS with an estimated fair value, including accrued interest, of approximately $3,932.6$3,959.0 million and a weighted average maturity of 340343 months, and cash pledged to counterparties of approximately $12.0$18.1 million. Through October 27, 2017,April 28, 2023, we have been able to maintain our repurchase facilities with comparable terms to those that existed at September 30, 2017March 31, 2023, with maturities through August 14, 2018.


35


September 1, 2023.

The table below presents information about our period end, maximum and average repurchase agreement obligationsbalances of borrowings for each quarter in 20172023 to date and 2016.


($ in thousands) 
        Difference Between Ending 
  Ending  Average  Borrowings and 
  Balance of  Balance of  Average Borrowings 
Three Months Ended Borrowings  Borrowings  Amount  Percent 
September 30, 2017 $3,710,077  $3,494,266  $215,811   6.18%
June 30, 2017  3,278,456   3,164,532   113,924   3.60%
March 31, 2017  3,050,608   2,922,157   128,451   4.40%
December 31, 2016  2,793,705  ��2,545,901   247,804   9.73%
September 30, 2016  2,298,097   2,179,462   118,635   5.44%
June 30, 2016  2,060,827   2,000,158   60,669   3.03%
March 31, 2016  1,939,489   1,962,901   (23,412)  (1.19)%

2022.

($ in thousands)

                     
              

Difference Between Ending

  
  

Ending

  

Maximum

  

Average

  

Borrowings and

  
  

Balance of

  

Balance of

  

Balance of

  

Average Borrowings

  

Three Months Ended

 

Borrowings

  

Borrowings

  

Borrowings

  

Amount

  

Percent

  

March 31, 2023

 $3,769,437  $3,849,137  $3,573,941  $195,496   5.47% 

December 31, 2022

  3,378,445   3,414,950   3,256,153   122,292   3.76% 

September 30, 2022

  3,133,861   4,047,606   3,446,420   (312,559)  (9.07)% 

June 30, 2022

  3,758,980   4,464,544   4,111,544   (352,564)  (8.57)% 

March 31, 2022

  4,464,109   6,244,106   5,354,107   (889,998)  (16.62)%

(1)

(1)

The lower ending balance relative to the average balance during the quarter ended March 31, 2022 reflects the disposal of RMBS pledged as collateral. During the quarter ended March 31, 2022, the Company’s investment in RMBS decreased $510.4 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Liquidity is our ability to turn non-cash assets into cash, purchase additional investments, repay principal and interest on borrowings, fund overhead, fulfill margin calls and pay dividends. Our principal immediateWe have both internal and external sources of liquidity. However, our material unused sources of liquidity include cash balances, unencumbered assets and borrowings under repurchase agreements.  Our borrowing capacity will vary over time as the market value of our interest earningability to sell encumbered assets varies.to raise cash. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through payments of principal and interest we receive on our RMBS portfolio. Management believes that we currently have sufficient liquidity and capital resources available for (a) the acquisition of additional investments consistent with the size and nature of our existing RMBS portfolio, (b) the repayments on borrowings and (c) the payment of dividends to the extent required for our continued qualification as a REIT. We may also generate liquidity from time to time by selling our equity or debt securities in public offerings or private placements.


Internal Sources of Liquidity

Our internal sources of liquidity include our cash balances, unencumbered assets and our ability to liquidate our encumbered security holdings. Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through payments of principal and interest we receive on our RMBS portfolio. Because our PT RMBS portfolio consists entirely of government and agency securities, we do not anticipate having difficulty converting our assets to cash should our liquidity needs ever exceed our immediately available sources of cash. Our structured RMBS portfolio also consists entirely of governmental agency securities, although they typically do not trade with comparable bid / ask spreads as PT RMBS. However, we anticipate that we would be able to liquidate such securities readily, even in distressed markets, although we would likely do so at prices below where such securities could be sold in a more stable market. To enhance our liquidity even further, we may pledge a portion of our structured RMBS as part of a repurchase agreement funding, but retain the cash in lieu of acquiring additional assets. In this way we can, at a modest cost, retain higher levels of cash on hand and decrease the likelihood we will have to sell assets in a distressed market in order to raise cash.

35

Our strategy for hedging our funding costs typically involves taking short positions in interest rate futures, treasury futures, interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions or other instruments. Since inception we have primarily used short positions in Eurodollar futures. When the market causes these short positions to decline in value we are required to meet margin calls with cash. This can reduce our liquidity position to the extent other securities in our portfolio move in price in such a way that we do not receive enough cash via margin calls to offset the derivative related margin calls. If this were to occur in sufficient magnitude, the loss of liquidity might force us to reduce the size of the levered portfolio, pledge additional structured securities to raise funds or risk operating the portfolio with less liquidity.


External Sources of Liquidity

Our primary external sources of liquidity are our ability to (i) borrow under master repurchase agreements, (ii) use the TBA security market and (iii) sell our equity or debt securities in public offerings or private placements. Our borrowing capacity will vary over time as the market value of our interest earning assets varies. Our master repurchase agreements have no stated expiration, but can be terminated at any time at our option or at the option of the counterparty. However, once a definitive repurchase agreement under a master repurchase agreement has been entered into, it generally may not be terminated by either party. A negotiated termination can occur, but may involve a fee to be paid by the party seeking to terminate the repurchase agreement transaction.


36


Under our repurchase agreement funding arrangements, we are required to post margin at the initiation of the borrowing. The margin posted represents the haircut, which is a percentage of the market value of the collateral pledged. To the extent the market value of the asset collateralizing the financing transaction declines, the market value of our posted margin will be insufficient and we will be required to post additional collateral. Conversely, if the market value of the asset pledged increases in value, we would be over collateralized and we would be entitled to have excess margin returned to us by the counterparty. Our lenders typically value our pledged securities daily to ensure the adequacy of our margin and make margin calls as needed, as do we. Typically, but not always, the parties agree to a minimum threshold amount for margin calls so as to avoid the need for nuisance margin calls on a daily basis. Our master repurchase agreements do not specify the haircut; rather haircuts are determined on an individual repurchaserepo transaction basis. Throughout the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, haircuts on our pledged collateral remained stable and as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, our weighted average haircut was approximately 5.5%4.4% of the value of our collateral.


As discussed earlier,collateral compared to 4.9% as of December 31, 2022.

TBAs represent a form of off-balance sheet financing and are accounted for as derivative instruments. (See Note 4 to our Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for additional details on our TBAs). Under certain market conditions, it may be uneconomical for us to roll our TBAs into future months and we may need to take or make physical delivery of the underlying securities. If we were required to take physical delivery to settle a long TBA, we would have to fund our total purchase commitment with cash or other financing sources and our liquidity position could be negatively impacted.

Our TBAs are also subject to margin requirements governed by the Mortgage-Backed Securities Division ("MBSD") of the FICC and by our Master Securities Forward Transaction Agreements (“MSFTAs”), which may establish margin levels in excess of the MBSD. Such provisions require that we establish an initial margin based on the notional value of the TBA, which is subject to increase if the estimated fair value of our TBAs or the estimated fair value of our pledged collateral declines. The MBSD has the sole discretion to determine the value of our TBAs and of the pledged collateral securing such contracts. In the event of a margin call, we must generally provide additional collateral on the same business day.

Settlement of our TBA obligations by taking delivery of the underlying securities as well as satisfying margin requirements could negatively impact our liquidity position. However, since we do not use TBA dollar roll transactions as our primary source of financing, we believe that we will have adequate sources of liquidity to meet such obligations.

We invest a portion of our capital in structured Agency RMBS. We generally do not apply leverage to this portion of our portfolio. The leverage inherent in structured securities replaces the leverage obtained by acquiring PT securities and funding them in the repurchase market. This structured RMBS strategy has been a core element of the Company'sCompany’s overall investment strategy since inception. However, we have and may continue to pledge a portion of our structured RMBS in order to raise our cash levels, but generally will not pledge these securities in order to acquire additional assets.


The following table summarizes the effect on our liquidity and cash flows from contractual obligations for repurchase agreements and interest expense on repurchase agreements.

(in thousands)               
  Obligations Maturing 
  Within One Year  One to Three Years  Three to Five Years  More than Five Years  Total 
Repurchase agreements $3,710,077  $-  $-  $-  $3,710,077 
Interest expense on repurchase agreements(1)
  13,672   -   -   -   13,672 
Totals $3,723,749  $-  $-  $-  $3,723,749 

(1)Interest expense on repurchase agreements is based on current interest rates as of September 30, 2017 and the remaining term of the liabilities existing at that date.

In future periods, we expect to continue to finance our activities in a manner that is consistent with our current operations through repurchase agreements. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of $161.7$143.2 million. We generated cash flows of $350.4$95.6 million from principal and interest payments on our RMBS and had average repurchase agreements outstanding of $3,193.7$3,573.9 million during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023.

As described more fully below, we may also access liquidity by selling our equity or debt securities in public offerings or private placements.

36


Stockholders'

Stockholders Equity


On JulyOctober 29, 2016,2021, we entered into an equity distribution agreement (the "July 2016“October 2021 Equity Distribution Agreement"Agreement”) with twofour sales agents pursuant to which we could offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000$250,000,000 of shares of our common stock in transactions that were deemed to be "at“at the market"market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. We issued a total of 10,174,9929,742,188 shares under the July 2016October 2021 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $110.0approximately $151.8 million, and net proceeds of approximately $108.2$149.3 million, net ofafter commissions and fees, prior to its termination.termination in March 2023. 


On February 23, 2017,March 7, 2023, we entered into anotheran equity distribution agreement as amended and restated on May 10, 2017, (the "May 2017“March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement"Agreement”) with twothree sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000$250,000,000 of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be "at“at the market"market” offerings and privately negotiated transactions. The May 2017No shares have been issued under the March 2023 Equity Distribution Agreement replaced the July 2016 Equity Distribution Agreement. We issuedthrough March 31, 2023 .

Outlook

Economic Summary

As 2022 came to a total of 12,299,032 shares under the May 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $125.0 million, and net proceeds of approximately $122.9 million, net of commissions and fees, prior to its termination.


37

On August 2, 2017, we entered into another equity distribution agreement (the "August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement") with two sales agents pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate amount of $125,000,000 of shares of our common stock in transactions that are deemed to be "at the market" offerings and privately negotiated transactions.  The August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement replaced the May 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement. Through September 30, 2017, we have not issued any shares under the August 2017 Equity Distribution Agreement.

Outlook

Interest Ratesclose and the MBS Market

In many respectscalendar turned to 2023, there was clear divergence in the third quarter was a repeat ofoutlook for monetary policy between the first and second. Economic and market developments continued the trend in place since March.  Inflation data continued to come in below market expectations.  Optimism stemming from the surprise outcome of the U.S. Presidential election last November and the markets' expectations for progress on health care, regulatory and tax reform, infrastructure spending, etc. were not realized.  In contrast, events in Washington were chaotic at times as the Trump Administration struggled with a Republican party rife with internal struggles and political infighting inside the White House itself.  Efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act seemed to come to an end and the continued in-fighting among Republicans called into question the ability of the Trump Administration to accomplish anything meaningful. The Federal Reserve (the "Fed"“Fed”) raised their target forand the Federalmarket.  Market pricing in the Fed Funds futures market implied the Fed would increase the Fed Funds rate by 25 bps one or possibly two more times in early 2023 and then begin to lower the Fed Funds rate in Marchlate 2023 and June,continue doing so in 2024 as inflation moderated towards the Fed’s 2% target rate and announcedthe economy slowed.  The Fed, as reflected in their “dot plot” and frequent public statements, implied they would hold the Fed Funds rate steady throughout 2023 after the expected hikes early in the year.  The divergence persisted through January of 2023 and into early February until the incoming economic data began to change and clearly supported the Fed’s case that inflation was not slowing and that monetary policy would need to be restrictive until the data warranted such a taperingchange.

The January non-farm payroll report released on February 3, 2023 indicated the economy added over 500,000 jobs in January.  The inflation data released in late 2022 was revised higher. It was becoming clear that market pricing of their asset purchasesfuture Fed Funds levels was too optimistic and that the Fed had more work to do. Measures of inflation related to goods had clearly slowed, reflecting the easing of supply constraints brought about by the pandemic, coupled with a shift in September.consumption patterns away from goods and towards services. However, the Fed’s focus was on service-related inflation, particularly service-related inflation excluding shelter related costs.  This measure of inflation was not declining.  Further, the Fed sees service inflation as being strongly influenced by wage pressures.  With the unemployment rate near historical lows and wage inflation high, there was no reason to believe service-related inflation was about to abruptly slow. In fact, data released in the first months of 2023 for this measure, what is now referred to as “super core” inflation, appears to have accelerated. Strong job growth will only exacerbate the problem. The market remained skepticalpricing for Fed Funds futures moved higher starting in early February and the terminal rate for Fed Funds moved above 5.5% in early March.

This was not the last time the outlook for the economy, inflation and Fed Funds levels would change during the first quarter. In early March there were two large regional bank failures that required the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to intervene.  The speed with which the banks failed caught the market by surprise and required rapid responses by monetary authorities.  The Fed introduced a bank term lending facility (“BTLF”) and the FDIC announced they would guarantee all deposits at both banks, regardless of size. The cause for both failures was deposit withdrawals.  With short-term rates having risen by well over 400 bps in approximately 1 year, the banks that could not afford to pay correspondingly high rates on their deposits were vulnerable to losing previously cheap funding.  The market expected further problems across the industry and anticipated the Fed would not be able to follow through with as many additional hikes ascontinue to increase rates and risk exacerbating the problem.  Market pricing in the Fed was expectingFunds futures market moved from a terminal rate above 5.5% to pricing in multiple cuts to the Fed Funds rate by year-end.  Interest rates across the curve moved quickly lower. 

As the first quarter of 2023 came to a close it appeared the macroprudential policies imposed by the FDIC, U.S. Treasury and Fed were containing the deposit problem in the banking industry.  Once again, the market outlook shifted and the outlook for monetary pricing has shifted as corewell.  Economic data, particularly labor market and inflation readings continued to show year over year declines, with manyrelated data has remained supportive of the elementsnotion that the Fed would have to move policy to more restrictive levels and keep it there longer. The brief banking crisis initially appeared to have been contained; however, additional bank failures are possible.

Interest Rates

The two-year U.S. Treasury note is the index exhibiting persistent weakness.  Geopolitical events – particularly with respectmost sensitive to North Korea – keep the world and markets on edge.anticipated Fed Funds levels.  The yield on the 10-year US2-year U.S. Treasury note was approximately 4.43% on December 31, 2022, declined to just above 4% in early February, increased rapidly after the payroll report on February 3, 2023, to a high of 5.07% on March 8, 2023, then declined to a low of approximately 3.77% on March 24, 2023 after the two bank failures occurred. Since the first quarter ended, the 2-year yield has continued to move significantly from day to day as data and headlines dictate. The daily volatility in the rates market was near historical highs, particularly short-term rates.  Over the course of the first quarter the level of interest rates over the entire curve – nominal rates or SOFR swap levels – did not move materially.  All movements along the curve were plus or minus approximately 40 bps.  Rates/swaps were higher on shorter maturities (six-month maturities or less) and higher for 2-year maturities and longer.  However, this masks the extreme volatility during the quarter where daily movements of 20 bps occurred for several days at a time.  Interest rate hit itsvolatility is a significant driver of Agency RMBS prices and performance.  With volatility so high during the quarter, performance was negatively impacted, particularly in March, as described below. 

Mortgage rates available to borrowers for Agency RMBS were more stable during the first quarter of 2023.  The Mortgage Bankers Association 30-year survey rate averaged 6.45% for the quarter, with a high of 6.79% and a low of 6.18% for the quarter.  Note the first quarter is typically the seasonal trough for housing activity and, with rates still generally far above levels available to borrowers a year or more ago, refinancing activity during the first quarter was barely above the level that occurred in December of 2022, which in turn was the lowest level observed since the very early 2000s.

The Agency RMBS Market

The Agency RMBS market generated a total return of 2.5% for the first quarter of 2023.  The sector underperformed comparable duration SOFR swaps by 0.2% for the first quarter.  Performance for the quarter was meaningfully impacted by the extreme volatility in March.  For the month of March, the sector returns were 2.0% and -1.2% versus comparable duration SOFR swaps.  Performance across the 30-year sector versus comparable duration SOFR swaps was uneven, as lower (2.0% and 2.5% securities) and higher coupons (5.0% and 5.5% securities) underperformed intermediate coupon securities. 

The Agency RMBS sector underperformed investment grade and sub-investment grade corporates both on an absolute and relative basis (to comparable duration swaps) for the quarter.  Performance versus most other sectors of the domestic fixed income markets was generally comparable. 

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Developments

In response to date low on September 7, 2017, closing at 2.04%, and nearly broke below the psychologically important 2% level intra-day. Mother nature had a hand in shaping developmentsdeterioration in the markets as well, as three major hurricanes made landfall – onefor U.S. Treasuries, Agency RMBS and other mortgage and fixed income markets resulting from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed implemented a program of quantitative easing. Through November of 2021, the Fed was committed to purchasing $80 billion of U.S. Treasuries and $40 billion of Agency RMBS each month. In November of 2021, it began tapering its net asset purchases each month, ended net asset purchases by early March of 2022, and ended asset purchases entirely in Texas, FloridaSeptember of 2022. On May 4, 2022, the FOMC announced a plan for reducing the Fed’s balance sheet. In June of 2022, in accordance with this plan, the Fed began reducing its balance sheet by a maximum of $30 billion of U.S. Treasuries and Puerto Rico. In$17.5 billion of Agency RMBS each month. On September 21, 2022, the caseFOMC announced the Fed’s decision to continue reducing the balance sheet by a maximum of Texas, Hurricane Harvey caused unprecedented flooding$60 billion of U.S. Treasuries and disrupted$35 billion of Agency RMBS per month.

On January 29, 2021, the Nation's oil refining capacityCenter for several days.


However, there was a perceptible changeDisease Control and Prevention issued guidance extending eviction moratoriums for covered persons put in market sentiment in early September,place by the CARES Act through March 31, 2021. The FHFA subsequently extended the foreclosure moratorium for loans backed by the Enterprisesand the market reversed course intoeviction moratorium for real estate owned by the Enterprisesuntil July 31, 2021 and September 30, 2021, respectively. The U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department subsequently extended the FHA foreclosure and eviction moratoria to July 31, 2021, and September 30, 2021, respectively.  Despite the expirations of these foreclosure moratoria, a final rule adopted by the CFPB on June 28, 2021, effectively prohibited servicers from initiating a foreclosure before January 1, 2022, in most instances. Foreclosure activity has risen since the end of the third quarter and early fourth quarter. Geo-political events calmed down, removing the flight-to-quality induced demand for safe-haven assets, and economic news strengthened.  Events in Washington turned mildly positive as the Trump Administration pivoted away from health care reform to tax reform,moratorium, with what the market perceived to be slightly better prospects for success. Inflation data finally met expectations and showed signs of reversing its decline when the August data was released on September 14th.    Finally, on September 20th, Fed Chairwomen Yellen sounded quite hawkish and reiterated her belief that recent inflation data represented temporary or transitory effects and would reverse soon enough back towards their 2% target.  It was quite clear the Fed intended to raise the Federal Funds rate again in December. The market responded as Fed Funds futures pricing implied a 70-80% probability of a 25 basis point increaseforeclosure starts in the Federal Funds rate in December.  Thefirst quarter of 2023 up 22% year over year, but still remaining lower than pre-pandemic levels. 

On September economic data30, 2019, the FHFA announced that the Enterpriseswere allowed to increase their capital buffers to $25 billion and $20 billion, respectively, from the prior limit of $3 billion each. This step could ultimately lead to the Enterprisesbeing privatized and represents the first concrete step on the road to Enterprise reform.  In December 2020, the FHFA released in early October has also been very strong,a final rule on a new regulatory framework for the Enterpriseswhich seeks to implement both a risk-based capital framework and the anticipated short-term effects of the hurricanes appears to have been less than feared. Further, the repair work associated with the hurricanes should put even more upward pressure on economic activity.


As we move into the fourth quarter, market pricing of additional policy accommodation removal is far less than the Fed anticipates. The latest reads on inflation returned to its aforementioned string of below expectations readings.  The perceived lack of meaningful inflation, coupled with a hawkish fed, has causedminimum leverage capital requirements. On January 14, 2021, the U.S. Treasury curve and the FHFA executed letter agreements allowing the Enterprisesto flatten,continue to retain capital up to their regulatory minimums, including buffers, as prescribed in the spread between 5-yearDecember rule.  These letter agreements provide, in part, (i) there will be no exit from conservatorship until all material litigation is settled and the Enterprise has common equity Tier 1 capital of at least 3% of its assets, (ii) the Enterpriseswill comply with the FHFA’s regulatory capital framework, (iii) higher-risk single-family mortgage acquisitions will be restricted to current levels, and (iv) the U.S. Treasury Notes and 30-year Treasury Bonds is at multi-year lows.  The market is also facedthe FHFA will establish a timeline and process for future Enterprise reform. However, no definitive proposals or legislation have been released or enacted with uncertainty surrounding President Trump's appointmentrespect to ending the conservatorship, unwinding the Enterprises, or materially reducing the roles of the next Fed chair, with many of the leading candidates perceived to be more hawkish by the markets than the current chairwoman, even though she remains a candidate herself.  Regardless of the uncertaintyEnterprises in the bond market,U.S. mortgage market. On September 14, 2021, the equity markets, and risk markets generally, continue to hit all-time high closes almost daily,U.S. Treasury and the combination of robust economic data, low inflationFHFA suspended certain policy provisions in the January agreement, including limits on loans acquired for cash consideration, multifamily loans, loans with higher risk characteristics and the prospects for tax reform make for an ideal environment for risk assets.

38

The mortgage market closed the quarter with the current coupon, 30-year fixed rate Agency RMBS trading at the tightest spread to comparable duration U.S. Treasuries since early 2014.  As has been the case for much of the year, lower coupon RMBS outperformed high coupon RMBS versus their comparable duration U.S. Treasury benchmarks.  As we approach the winter monthssecond homes and the seasonal slowdown in prepayment activity, coupled with the increase in rates that began in early September, speeds should continue to moderate.

Recent Regulatory Developments

investment properties.  On January 12, 2016,February 25, 2022, the FHFA issued RIN 2590-AA39, Memberspublished a final rule, effective as of Federal Home Loan Banks (the "Final Rule"). The Final Rule,April 26, 2022, amending the Enterprise capital framework established in December 2020 by, among other things, expressly excludes captive insurance companies, such as our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary, Orchid Island Casualty, LLC ("Orchid Island Casualty")replacing the fixed leverage buffer equal to 1.5% of an Enterprise’s adjusted total assets with a dynamic leverage buffer equal to 50% of an Enterprise’s stability capital buffer, reducing the risk weight floor from 10% to 5%, from being eligibleand removing the requirement that the Enterprises must apply an overall effectiveness adjustment to their credit risk transfer exposures. On June 14, 2022, the Enterprises announced that they would each charge a 50 bps fee for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") system. Under the Final Rule, there was a one-year transition period from the effective date of February 19, 2016 within which the FHLBs were required to wind down their relationships with any captive insurance companies that had been admitted to membershipcommingled securities issued on or after September 12, 2014, including Orchid Island Casualty ("Post-NPR Captives"July 1, 2022 to cover the additional capital required for such securities under the Enterprise capital framework, which was subsequently reduced on January 19, 2023 to 9.375 bps for commingled securities issued on or after April 1, 2023 to address industry concern that the fee posed a risk to the fungibility of the Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security (“UMBS”) and negatively impacted liquidity and pricing in the market for TBA securities.

In 2017, policymakers announced that LIBOR will be replaced by December 31, 2021. The directive was spurred by the fact that banks are uncomfortable contributing to the LIBOR panel given the shortage of underlying transactions on which to base levels and the liability associated with submitting an unfounded level. However, the ICE Benchmark Administration, in its capacity as administrator of USD LIBOR, has announced that it intends to extend publication of USD LIBOR (other than one-week and two-month tenors) by 18 months to June 2023. 

On December 7, 2021, the CFPB released a final rule that amends Regulation Z, which implemented the Truth in Lending Act, aimed at addressing cessation of LIBOR for both closed-end (e.g., home mortgage) and open-end (e.g., home equity line of credit) products. The rule, which mostly became effective in April of 2022, establishes requirements for the selection of replacement indices for existing LIBOR-linked consumer loans. Although the rule does not mandate the use of SOFR as the alternative rate, it identifies SOFR as a comparable rate for closed-end products and states that for open-end products, the CFPB has determined that ARRC’s recommended spread-adjusted indices based on SOFR for consumer products to replace the one-month, three-month, or six-month USD LIBOR index “have historical fluctuations that are substantially similar to those of the LIBOR indices that they are intended to replace.” The CFPB reserved judgment, however, on a SOFR-based spread-adjusted replacement index to replace the one-year USD LIBOR until it obtained additional information.

On March 15, 2022, the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act (the “LIBOR Act”) was signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (H.R. 2471). The Final Rule also precludes the FHLBs from makingLIBOR Act provides for a statutory replacement benchmark rate for contracts that use LIBOR as a benchmark and do not contain any new advances or extending existing advances to Post-NPR Captives. In addition, upon the terminationfallback mechanism independent of membership, the FHLBs were required to liquidate all outstanding advances to Post-NPR Captives, settle all other business transactions, and repurchase or redeem all FHLB stock held by the terminated Post-NPR Captive in accordance with the Final Rule. Therefore, Orchid Island Casualty, along with all other Post-NPR Captives, was required to completely wind down all business relationships with the FHLBC, including the repayment of all outstanding advances, prior to or simultaneously with the termination of Orchid Island Casualty's membership with the FHLBC.


The adopting release for the Final Rule expressly invited Congress to address the treatment of Post-NPR Captives with respect to membership in the FHLB. In October 2015, Reps. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.), Denny Heck (D-Wash.), Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) and John Carney (D-Del.) introduced H.R. 3808, a bill that would have preemptively prevented the FHFA from adopting the Final Rule in such a way that would foreclose membership in the FHLB to captive insurance companies. There can be no way of predicting if any subsequent legislation addressing the status of Post-NPR Captives with respectLIBOR. Pursuant to the FHLB willLIBOR Act, SOFR becomes the new benchmark rate by operation of law for any such contract. The LIBOR Act establishes a safe harbor from litigation for claims arising out of or related to the use of SOFR as the recommended benchmark replacement. The LIBOR Act makes clear that it should not be proposed in either house of Congress,construed to disfavor the likelihood of passageuse of any such legislation,benchmark on a prospective basis.

On July 28, 2022, the Fed published a proposed rule to implement the LIBOR Act, which was adopted on December 16, 2022.  The final rule, which went into effect on February 27, 2023, sets benchmark SOFR rates to replace overnight, one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month LIBOR contracts and provides mechanisms for converting most existing LIBOR contracts, including Agency RMBS, to SOFR no later than June 30, 2023.

The LIBOR Act also attempts to forestall challenges that it is impairing contracts. It provides that the discontinuance of LIBOR and the ultimate effects, if any, onautomatic statutory transition to a replacement rate neither impairs or affects the availabilityrights of short-term, low-cost funding provided bya party to receive payment under such contracts, nor allows a party to discharge their performance obligations or to declare a breach of contract. It amends the FHLBsTrust Indenture Act of 1939 to Post-NPR Captives subsequent tostate that the enactment“the right of any holder of any indenture security to receive payment of the principal of and interest on such legislation.


indenture security shall not be deemed to be impaired or affected” by application of the LIBOR Act to any indenture security.

The scope and nature of the actions the U.S. government or the Fed will ultimately undertake are unknown and will continue to evolve.  Although the Trump administration has made statements of its intentions to reform housing finance and tax policy, many of these potential policy changes will require congressional action.  In addition, the Fed has made statements regarding additional increases to the Federal Funds Rate over the balance of 2017 and beyond.  The Fed also announced that it will begin to reduce its holdings of Agency MBS and U.S. treasuries.


Effect on Us


Regulatory developments, movements in interest rates and prepayment rates affect us in many ways, including the following:


Effects on our Assets


A change in or elimination of the guarantee structure of Agency RMBS may increase our costs (if, for example, guarantee fees increase) or require us to change our investment strategy altogether. For example, the elimination of the guarantee structure of Agency RMBS may cause us to change our investment strategy to focus on non-Agency RMBS, which in turn would require us to significantly increase our monitoring of the credit risks of our investments in addition to interest rate and prepayment risks.


39


Lower long-term interest rates can affect the value of our Agency RMBS in a number of ways.

If prepayment rates are relatively low (due, in part, to the refinancing problems described above), lower long-term interest rates can increase the value of higher-couponour Agency RMBS. This is because investors typically place a premium on assets with coupon/yields that are higher than coupon/yields available in the market. To the extent such securities pre-pay slower than would otherwise be the case, we benefit from an above market yields.coupon/yield for longer, enhancing the return from the security. Although lower long-term interest rates may increase asset values in our portfolio, we may not be able to invest new funds in similarly-yieldingsimilarly yielding assets.


If prepayment levels increase, the value of any of our Agency RMBS that are carried at a premium to par that are affected by such prepayments may decline. This is because a principal prepayment accelerates the effective term of an Agency RMBS, which would shorten the period during which an investor would receive above-market returns (assuming the yield on the prepaid asset is higher than market yields). Also, prepayment proceeds may not be able to be reinvested in similar-yielding assets. Agency RMBS backed by mortgages with high interest rates are more susceptible to prepayment risk because holders of those mortgages are most likely to refinance to a lower rate. If prepayment levels decrease, the value of any of our Agency RMBS that are carried at a discount to par that are affected by such prepayments may increase. This is because a principal prepayment accelerates the effective term of an Agency RMBS, which would shorten the timeframe over which an investor would receive the principal of the underlying loans. Agency RMBS backed by mortgages with low interest rates are less susceptible to prepayment risk because holders of those mortgages are less likely to refinance to a higher rate. IOs and IIOs, however, may be the types of Agency RMBS most sensitive to increased prepayment rates. Because the holder of an IO or IIO receives no principal payments, the values of IOs and IIOs are entirely dependent on the existence of a principal balance on the underlying mortgages. If the principal balance is eliminated due to prepayment, IOs and IIOs essentially become worthless. Although increased prepayment rates can negatively affect the value of our IOs and IIOs, they have the opposite effect on POs. Because POs act like zero-coupon bonds, meaning they are purchased at a discount to their par value and have an effective interest rate based on the discount and the term of the underlying loan, an increase in prepayment rates would reduce the effective term of our POs and accelerate the yields earned on those assets, which would increase our net income.

Higher long-term rates can also affect the value of our Agency RMBS.  As long-term rates rise, rates available to borrowers also rise.  This tends to cause prepayment activity to slow and extend the expected average life of mortgage cash flows.  As the expected average life of the mortgage cash flows increases, coupled with higher discount rates, the value of Agency RMBS declines.  Some of the instruments we use to hedge our Agency RMBS assets, such as interest rate futures, swaps and swaptions, are stable average life instruments.  This means that to the extent we use such instruments to hedge our Agency RMBS assets, our hedges may not adequately protect us from price declines, and therefore may negatively impact our book value.  It is for this reason we use interest only securities in our portfolio. As interest rates rise, the expected average life of these securities increases, causing generally positive price movements as the number and size of the cash flows increase the longer the underlying mortgages remain outstanding. This makes interest only securities desirable hedge instruments for pass-through Agency RMBS. 

40

The Agency RMBS market began to experience severe dislocations in mid-March 2020 as a result of the economic, health and market turmoil brought about by COVID-19. On March 23, 2020, the Fed announced that it would purchase Agency RMBS and U.S. Treasuries in the amounts needed to support smooth market functioning, which largely stabilized the Agency RMBS market, but ended these purchases in March 2022 and announced plans to reduce its balance sheet. The Fed’s continued reduction of its balance sheet could negatively impact our investment portfolio.

Because we base our investment decisions on risk management principles rather than anticipated movements in interest rates, in a volatile interest rate environment we may allocate more capital to structured Agency RMBS with shorter durations, such as short-term fixed and floating rate CMOs.durations. We believe these securities have a lower sensitivity to changes in long-term interest rates than other asset classes. We may attempt to mitigate our exposure to changes in long-term interest rates by investing in IOs and IIOs, which typically have different sensitivities to changes in long-term interest rates than PT RMBS, particularly PT RMBS backed by fixed-rate mortgages.


If Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were to modify or end their repurchase programs, our investment portfolio could be negatively impacted.

Effects on our borrowing costs


We leverage our PT RMBS portfolio and a portion of our structured Agency RMBS with principal balances through the use of short-term repurchase agreement transactions. The interest rates on our debt are determined by market levels of both the Fed Funds Rate and LIBOR. An increaseshort term interest rate markets. Increases in the Fed Funds Raterate, SOFR or LIBOR wouldtypically increase our borrowing costs, which could affect our interest rate spread if there is no corresponding increase in the interest we earn on our assets. This would be most prevalent with respect to our Agency RMBS backed by fixed rate mortgage loans because the interest rate on a fixed-rate mortgage loan does not change even though market rates may change.


In order to protect our net interest margin against increases in short-term interest rates, we may enter into interest rate swaps, which effectivelyeconomically convert our floating-rate repurchase agreement debt to fixed-rate debt or utilize other hedging instruments such as EurodollarFed Funds and T-Note futures contracts or interest rate swaptions.


40


Summary


As we entered

The economy and the outlook for monetary policy during the first quarter were very volatile.  While it is likely we are nearing the end of 2017, risk assets were performing very well as the Trump administration took officeaccelerated policy removal period that began last March the outlook for monetary policy over the course of 2023 and appeared to be very pro-business.  The markets looked forward to a roll back of recently expanding regulations across many industries, a new and hopefully improved health care act, tax reform and possibly much needed infrastructure spending to refurbishbeyond changed multiple times during the nation's aging roads, highways, bridges and airports.  Whilequarter, generating significant interest rate volatility, particularly in March. 

As the Administration made bold promises, there has been very little delivered.  Market optimism was quickly replaced with pessimism.  Political infighting among the Administration and congressional republicans has generally been the cause, as has turmoil within the White House itself.   Geopolitical events surfaced in early April, specifically the Korean peninsula.  These events keptfirst quarter began the market, on edge and induced sporadic flight to quality rallies as headlines hit the market from time to time. Incoming inflation  data since March  was below expectations.  In the case of the core Consumer Price Index, ("CPI") measure, the year over year figure moved from 2.3% in January 2017 to 1.7% by May and has stayed there through September.  Despite these readings, the Federal Reserve remains convinced these readings are being driven by temporary or transitory phenomenon and that inflation will reverse and head back towards their two percent target over the medium term.  To wit, the Fed appears as if they will hike their target rate again at the December meeting baring surprise outcomes to the downside.  The market accepts this outcome as highly likely – as reflected in Fed Funds futures pricing.  However, using the same measure, the market does not expectpricing, anticipated the Fed to raise rates in 2018 and beyond to the extentwould hike the Fed expects to.Funds rate one or possibly two more times in early 2023 and then pivot to easing later in the year as inflation moderated towards their long-term goal of 2%.  The incoming economic data in early February and for the balance of the quarter was strong, especially with respect to inflation, the labor market and wages.  The Fed, cognizant that goods inflation has already moderated significantly, is focused on services inflation, particularly services excluding housing or shelter related costs (what is currently referred to as “super core” inflation).  Readings on “super core” inflation accelerated during the quarter.  As the data was released over the balance of the quarter market pricing for Fed Funds over the course of the year continued to increase and the projected terminal rate eventually exceeded 5.5%.  Consistent with a result, the combination of benign inflation readings currently coupled with hawkish Fed expectation has causedpolicy rate that was likely to remain elevated for a considerable period, the yield curveon the 2-year U.S. Treasury reached 5.07% in early March.

The volatility continued, and in fact increased, when a brief banking crisis occurred in early March.  Two banks failed and were taken over by the FDIC.  The FDIC, U.S. Treasury and Fed responded quickly and as we enter the second quarter it seems the macroprudential steps taken appear to flatten significantly – to multi-year lows.  A second order effecthave contained the crisis. However, in the immediate aftermath of these developments, has occurredthe market reaction was rapid and significant.  The two-year U.S. Treasury yield decreased by approximately 130 bps in a little over two weeks.  Market pricing of Fed Funds at the end of 2023 reflected 3 or 4 25 bps cuts.  The December 2023 contract price moved nearly 175 bps in the equity and risk markets as they continue to perform exceedingly well.  week after the first failure of Silicon Valley Bank.  In sum, volatility across the entire rates market was extremely elevated, surpassing all previous periods since the 2008 financial crisis. 

The major equity indices inperformance for the US make record new highs almost daily.


TheAgency RMBS market has performed wellwas in this environment asline with most sectors of the resulting lowfixed income markets during the first quarter of 2023 with the exception of the investment grade and sub-investment grade corporate bonds.  However, the volatility tight trading spreads across mostdescribed above, which peaked during March, meaningfully impacted performance for the sector in March.  The return for the sector versus comparable asset classes and with demand from asset managers and REIT's easily replacingduration SOFR swaps was -1.2%.  Across the lost demand expected from the Fed's tapering of their asset purchases. Current coupon, 30-year, fixed rate mortgage are trading atsector of the Agency RMBS market returns were uneven, as higher and lower coupons – over 4.5% and below 3.0% - trailed returns for the intermediate coupons.

The failure of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank led to their tightest spread to comparable duration treasuries since early 2014.   If these conditions persist we do not believetakeover by the FDIC. The FDIC took possession of approximately $114 billion of securities held by the two banks that the marketFDIC needs to liquidate.  These sales will occur over the balance of 2023.  The magnitude of these sales in proportion to typical supply levels in the current rate environment represents a formidable risk to the performance of the sector over the near term.  The Agency RMBS expected to be sold – predominantly lower coupon 30, 20 and 15-year securities, have underperformed higher coupon securities since the proposed liquidations were announced. The liquidation sales commenced on April 18th, 2023, and are expected to continue for 30 to 40 more weeks. The Company’s portfolio contains a significant allocation to some of the securities to be sold.  These securities have performed poorly since the announcement date of the liquidations and their poor relative performance may continue.  To the extent this trend continues the Company’s performance will be likely to suffer a material widening of spreads to comparable duration U.S. treasuries, even as the Fed has started to trim their asset purchases.  The risk to this outcome appears to be inflation exceeding market expectations which should allow the Fed to carry out their professed intentions to raise rates three times in 2018 and more soaffected absent changes in the years after. This would also put upward pressure on volatility and longer-term rates, both negatively impacting MBS performance.


construction of the portfolio or hedges.

Critical Accounting Policies


Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP requires our management to make some complex and subjective decisions and assessments. Our most critical accounting policiesestimates involve decisions and assessments which could significantly affect reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. There have been no changes to our critical accounting policiesestimates as discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.


2022.

Capital Expenditures


At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

41


Dividends


In addition to other requirements that must be satisfied to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must pay annual dividends to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains. REIT taxable income (loss) is computed in accordance with the Code, and can be greater than or less than our financial statement net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP. These book to tax differences primarily relate to the recognition of interest income on RMBS, unrealized gains and losses on RMBS, and the amortization of losses on derivative instruments that are treated as funding hedges for tax purposes.


We intend to pay regular monthly dividends to our stockholders and have declared the following dividends since the completion of our IPO.


(in thousands, except per share amounts) 
Year Per Share Amount  Total 
2013 $1.395  $4,662 
2014  2.160   22,643 
2015  1.920   38,748 
2016  1.680   41,388 
2017 - YTD(1)
  1.400   56,027 
Totals $8.555  $163,468 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Year

 

Per Share Amount

  

Total

 

2013

 $6.975  $4,662 

2014

  10.800   22,643 

2015

  9.600   38,748 

2016

  8.400   41,388 

2017

  8.400   70,717 

2018

  5.350   55,814 

2019

  4.800   54,421 

2020

  3.950   53,570 

2021

  3.900   97,601 

2022

  2.475   87,906 

2023 - YTD(1)

  0.640   25,098 

Totals

 $65.290  $552,568 

(1)

On October 11, 2017,April 12, 2023, the Company declared a dividend of $0.14$0.16 per share to be paid on November 10, 2017.May 26, 2023. The effect of this dividend is included in the table above but is not reflected in the Company'sCompany’s financial statements as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2023.


Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in market factors such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The primary market risks that we are exposed to are interest rate risk, prepayment risk, spread risk, liquidity risk, extension risk and counterparty credit risk.


Interest Rate Risk


Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.


Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with our interest-bearing liabilities, by affecting the spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the level of interest rates can also affect the rate of prepayments of our securities and the value of the RMBS that constitute our investment portfolio, which affects our net income, and ability to realize gains from the sale of these assets and impacts our ability to borrow, and the amount that we can borrow against these securities.


We may utilize a variety of financial instruments in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on our operations. The principal instruments that we use are futures contracts, and options to enter into interest rate swaps.swaps and swaptions. These instruments are intended to serve as aan economic hedge against future interest rate increases on our repurchase agreement borrowings. Hedging techniques are partly based on assumed levels of prepayments of our Agency RMBS. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed, the life of the Agency RMBS will be longer or shorter, which would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may use and may cause losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of derivative securities are highly complex and may produce volatile returns. Hedging techniques are also limited by the rules relating to REIT qualification. In order to preserve our REIT status, we may be forced to terminate a hedging transaction at a time when the transaction is most needed.


Our profitability and the value of our investment portfolio (including derivatives used for hedging purposes) may be adversely affected during any period as a result of changing interest rates, including changes in the forward yield curve.


Our portfolio of PT RMBS is typically comprised of adjustable-rate RMBS ("ARMs"(“ARMs”), fixed-rate RMBS and hybrid adjustable-rate RMBS. We generally seek to acquire low duration assets that offer high levels of protection from mortgage prepayments provided that they are reasonably priced by the market. Although the duration of an individual asset can change as a result of changes in interest rates, we strive to maintain a hedged PT RMBS portfolio with an effective duration of less than 2.0. The stated contractual final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying our portfolio of PT RMBS generally ranges up to 30 years. However, the effect of prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans tends to shorten the resulting cash flows from our investments substantially. Prepayments occur for various reasons, including refinancing of underlying mortgages and loan payoffs in connection with home sales.


sales, and borrowers paying more than their scheduled loan payments, which accelerates the amortization of the loans.

The duration of our IO and IIO portfolios will vary greatly depending on the structural features of the securities. While prepayment activity will always affect the cash flows associated with the securities, the interest only nature of IOs may cause their durations to become extremely negative when prepayments are high, and less negative when prepayments are low. Prepayments affect the durations of IIOs similarly, but the floating rate nature of the coupon of IIOs (which is inversely related to the level of one month LIBOR) causecauses their price movements, and model duration, to be affected by changes in both prepayments and one month LIBOR, both current and anticipated levels. As a result, the duration of IIO securities will also vary greatly.


43


Prepayments on the loans underlying our RMBS can alter the timing of the cash flows from the underlying loans to us. As a result, we gauge the interest rate sensitivity of our assets by measuring their effective duration. While modified duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to movements in interest rates, effective duration captures both the movement in interest rates and the fact that cash flows to a mortgage related security are altered when interest rates move. Accordingly, when the contract interest rate on a mortgage loan is substantially above prevailing interest rates in the market, the effective duration of securities collateralized by such loans can be quite low because of expected prepayments.

43

We face the risk that the market value of our PT RMBS assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of our structured RMBS or liabilities, including our hedging instruments. Accordingly, we assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities. We generally calculate duration using various third party models. However, empirical results and various third party models may produce different duration numbers for the same securities.


The following sensitivity analysis shows the estimated impact on the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments and hedge positions as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016,2022, assuming rates instantaneously fall 200 bps, fall 100 bps, fall 50 bps, rise 50 bps, rise 100 bps and rise 100200 bps, adjusted to reflect the impact of convexity, which is the measure of the sensitivity of our hedge positions and Agency RMBS'RMBS’ effective duration to movements in interest rates.


We have a negatively convex asset profile and a linear to slightly positively convex hedge portfolio (short positions). It is not uncommon for us to have losses in both directions.

All changes in value in the table below are measured as percentage changes from the investment portfolio value and net asset value at the base interest rate scenario. The base interest rate scenario assumes interest rates and prepayment projections as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2016. We apply a floor of 0% for the down rate scenarios on our interest bearing liabilities and hedge positions, such that any hypothetical interest rate decrease would have a limited positive impact on our funding costs beyond a certain level.


2022.

Actual results could differ materially from estimates, especially in the current market environment. To the extent that these estimates or other assumptions do not hold true, which is likely in a period of high price volatility, actual results will likely differ materially from projections and could be larger or smaller than the estimates in the table below. Moreover, if different models were employed in the analysis, materially different projections could result. Lastly, while the table below reflects the estimated impact of interest rate increases and decreases on a static portfolio, we may from time to time sell any of our agency securities as a part of ourthe overall management of our investment portfolio.


Interest Rate Sensitivity(1)
 
  Portfolio    
  Market  Book 
Change in Interest Rate 
Value(2)(3)
  
Value(2)(4)
 
As of September 30, 2017      
-100 Basis Points  (0.32)%  (3.06)%
-50 Basis Points  (0.11)%  (1.05)%
+50 Basis Points  (0.44)%  (4.20)%
+100 Basis Points  (1.53)%  (14.47)%
As of December 31, 2016        
-100 Basis Points  0.55%  4.96%
-50 Basis Points  0.55%  4.97%
+50 Basis Points  (0.95)%  (8.61)%
+100 Basis Points  (2.20)%  (19.98)%

Interest Rate Sensitivity(1)

 
  

Portfolio

     
  

Market

  

Book

 

Change in Interest Rate

 

Value(2)(3)

  

Value(2)(4)

 

As of March 31, 2023

        

-200 Basis Points

  0.11%  0.99%

-100 Basis Points

  0.42%  3.72%

-50 Basis Points

  0.28%  2.51%

+50 Basis Points

  (0.47)%  (4.14)%

+100 Basis Points

  (1.03)%  (9.13)%

+200 Basis Points

  (2.41)%  (21.39)%

As of December 31, 2022

        

-200 Basis Points

  0.52%  4.18%

-100 Basis Points

  0.61%  4.92%

-50 Basis Points

  0.40%  3.25%

+50 Basis Points

  (0.43)%  (3.47)%

+100 Basis Points

  (1.04)%  (8.38)%

+200 Basis Points

  (2.51)%  (20.27)%

(1)

Interest rate sensitivity is derived from models that are dependent on inputs and assumptions provided by third parties as well as by our Manager, and assumes there are no changes in mortgage spreads and assumes a static portfolio. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

(2)

Includes the effect of derivatives and other securities used for hedging purposes.

(3)

Estimated dollar change in investment portfolio value expressed as a percent of the total fair value of our investment portfolio as of such date.

(4)

Estimated dollar change in portfolio value expressed as a percent of stockholders' equity as of such date.


44

In addition to changes in interest rates, other factors impact the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments, such as the shape of the yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest rates, the change in the fair value of our assets would likely differ from that shown above and such difference might be material and adverse to our stockholders.

44

Prepayment Risk


Because residential borrowers have the option to prepay their mortgage loans at par at any time, we face the risk that we will experience a return of principal on our investments faster than anticipated. Various factors affect the rate at which mortgage prepayments occur, including changes in the level of and directional trends in housing prices, interest rates, general economic conditions, loan age and size, loan-to-value ratio, the location of the property and social and demographic conditions. Additionally, changes to GSEgovernment sponsored entity underwriting practices or other governmental programs could also significantly impact prepayment rates or expectations. Generally, prepayments on Agency RMBS increase during periods of falling mortgage interest rates and decrease during periods of rising mortgage interest rates. However, this may not always be the case. We may reinvest principal repayments at a yield that is lower or higher than the yield on the repaid investment, thus affecting our net interest income by altering the average yield on our assets.


Spread Risk


When the market spread widens between the yield on our Agency RMBS and benchmark interest rates, our net book value could decline if the value of our Agency RMBS fallfalls by more than the offsetting fair value increases on our hedging instruments tied to the underlying benchmark interest rates. We refer to this as "spread risk" or "basis risk." The spread risk associated with our mortgage assets and the resulting fluctuations in fair value of these securities can occur independent of changes in benchmark interest rates and may relate to other factors impacting the mortgage and fixed income markets, such as actual or anticipated monetary policy actions by the Fed, market liquidity, or changes in required rates of return on different assets. Consequently, while we use futures contracts and interest rate swaps and swaptions to attempt to protect against moves in interest rates, such instruments typically will not protect our net book value against spread risk.


Liquidity Risk


The primary liquidity risk for us arises from financing long-term assets with shorter-term borrowings through repurchase agreements. Our assets that are pledged to secure repurchase agreements are Agency RMBS and cash. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2023, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $161.7$143.2 million and unpledged securities of approximately $12.9$53.8 million (not including unsettled securities purchases or securities pledged to us) available to meet margin calls on our repurchase agreements and derivative contracts, and for other corporate purposes. However, should the value of our Agency RMBS pledged as collateral or the value of our derivative instruments suddenly decrease, margin calls relating to our repurchase and derivative agreements could increase, causing an adverse change in our liquidity position. Further, there is no assurance that we will always be able to renew (or roll) our repurchase agreements. In addition, our counterparties have the option to increase our haircuts (margin requirements) on the assets we pledge against repurchase agreements, thereby reducing the amount that can be borrowed against an asset even if they agree to renew or roll the repurchase agreement. Significantly higher haircuts can reduce our ability to leverage our portfolio or even force us to sell assets, especially if correlated with asset price declines or faster prepayment rates on our assets.


45


Extension Risk


The projected weighted average life and the duration (or interest rate sensitivity) of our investments is based on our Manager's assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay the underlying mortgage loans. In general, we use futures contracts and interest rate swaps and swaptions to help manage our funding cost on our investments in the event that interest rates rise. These hedging instruments allow us to reduce our funding exposure on the notional amount of the instrument for a specified period of time.


However, if prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate environment, the average life or duration of our fixed-rate assets or the fixed-rate portion of the ARMs or other assets generally extends. This could have a negative impact on our results from operations, as our hedging instrument expirations are fixed and will, therefore, cover a smaller percentage of our funding exposure on our mortgage assets to the extent that their average lives increase due to slower prepayments. This situation may also cause the market value of our agency securitiesAgency RMBS and CMOs collateralized by fixed rate mortgages or hybrid ARMs to decline by more than otherwise would be the case while most of our hedging instruments would not receive any incremental offsetting gains. In extreme situations, we may be forced to sell assets to maintain adequate liquidity, which could cause us to incur realized losses.

45

Counterparty Credit Risk


We are exposed to counterparty credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized in the event that the counterparties to our repurchase agreements and derivative contracts fail to perform their obligations under such agreements. The amount of assets we pledge as collateral in accordance with our agreements varies over time based on the market value and notional amount of such assets as well as the value of our derivative contracts. In the event of a default by a counterparty, we may not receive payments provided for under the terms of our agreements and may have difficulty obtaining our assets pledged as collateral under such agreements. Our credit risk related to certain derivative transactions is largely mitigated through daily adjustments to collateral pledged based on changes in market value and we limit our counterparties to registered central clearing exchanges and major financial institutions with acceptable credit ratings.ratings, monitoring positions with individual counterparties and adjusting collateral posted as required. However, there is no guarantee our efforts to manage counterparty credit risk will be successful and we could suffer significant losses if unsuccessful.


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


As of the end of the period covered by this report (the "evaluation date"“evaluation date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO"“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the "CFO"“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act").Act. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded our disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective as of the evaluation date (1) in ensuring that information regarding the Company and its subsidiary is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, by our Manager's employees, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (2) in providing reasonable assurance that information we must disclose in itsour periodic reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms.


Changes in Internal ControlsControl over Financial Reporting


There were no significant changes in the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company'sCompany’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


We are not party to any material pending legal proceedings as described in Item 103 of Regulation S-K.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


There have been no material changes from the

A description of certain factors that may affect our future results and risk factors disclosedis set forth in the "Risk Factors" section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed withfor the SECyear ended December 31, 2022. As of March 31, 2023, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on February 17, 2017.


Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS


The table below presents share repurchase activity for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

        Shares Purchased  Maximum Number 
  Total Number  Weighted-Average  as Part of Publicly  of Shares That May Yet 
  of Shares  Price Paid  Announced  Be Repurchased Under 
  
Repurchased(1)
  Per Share  
Programs(2)
  
the Authorization(2)
 
July  -  $-   -   783,757 
August  -   -   -   783,757 
September  482   10.19   -   783,757 
Totals / Weighted Average  482  $10.19   -   783,757 

(1)The only shares of the Company's common stock acquired by the Company were in connection with the satisfaction of tax withholding obligations on vested employment-related awards under equity incentive plans.
(2)On June 29, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock repurchase beginning July 1, 2016. Unless modified or revoked by the Board, the authorization does not expire.

The Company did not have any unregistered sales of its equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2017.


March 31, 2023.

The table below presents the Company’s share repurchase activity for the three months ended March 31, 2023.

          

Shares Purchased

  

Maximum Number

 
  

Total Number

  

Weighted-Average

  

as Part of Publicly

  

of Shares That May Yet

 
  

of Shares

  

Price Paid

  

Announced

  

Be Repurchased Under

 
  

Repurchased(1)

  

Per Share

  

Programs

  

the Authorization

 

January 1, 2023 - January 31, 2023

  373,041  $10.62   373,041   4,928,350 

February 1, 2023 - February 28, 2023

  -   -   -   4,928,350 

March 1, 2023 - March 31, 2023

  645   10.56   -   4,928,350 

Totals / Weighted Average

  373,686  $10.62   373,041   4,928,350 

(1)

Includes 645 shares of the Company’s common stock acquired by the Company in connection with the satisfaction of tax withholding obligations on vested employment related awards under equity incentive plans. These repurchases do not reduce the number of shares available under the stock repurchase program authorization.

ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES


None.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not Applicable.


ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.


47

None.
47

ITEM 6.6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.


3.3Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.4

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.23.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 13, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1

Specimen Certificate of common stock of Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-11 (File No.333-184538)No. 333-184538) filed on November 28, 2012 and incorporated herein by referencereference).).

Exhibit 101.INS XBRL

Inline XBRL Instance Document **– the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.*

**

Exhibit 101.SCH XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Schema Document ***

Exhibit 101.CAL XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document***

Exhibit 101.DEF XBRL

Additional Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document Created***

Exhibit 101.LAB XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document ***

Exhibit 101.PRE XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ***

Exhibit 104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)


*

Filed herewith.

**

Furnished herewith.

***

Submitted electronically herewith.

Management contract or compensatory plan.


48

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


   

Orchid Island Capital, Inc.

 
   

Registrant

 
     
     

Date:October 27, 2017

         April 28, 2023

 

By:

/s/ Robert E. Cauley

 
   

Robert E. Cauley

Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)

     

Date:October 27, 2017

          April 28, 2023

 

By:

/s/ G. HunterGeorge H. Haas, IV

 
   
G. Hunter

George H. Haas, IV

Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and

Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

49

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.

Exhibit 101.INS XBRLInstance Document ***
Exhibit 101.SCH XBRLTaxonomy Extension Schema Document ***
Exhibit 101.CAL XBRLTaxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document***
Exhibit 101.DEF XBRLAdditional Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document Created***
Exhibit 101.LAB XBRLTaxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document ***
Exhibit 101.PRE XBRLTaxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ***

*Filed herewith.
**Furnished herewith.
***Submitted electronically herewith.


50