UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
xQUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period endedMarch 31,June 30, 2017
¨TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from _________ to ___________________________
000-21777
(Commission File Number)
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTDLTD..
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| British Columbia, Canada | Not Applicable | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer |
2300 – 1066 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 3X2 Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)
Issuer’s telephone number, including area code:(778) 373-1557
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:N/A
Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No¨
Check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx No¨
CheckIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. LargeSee definitions of "large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filerx Non-acceleratedfiler", "accelerated filer", "smaller reporting company" and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
| Large accelerated filer¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer x | Smaller reporting company¨ | Emerging growth company ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Check whether the registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes¨ Nox
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:As of May 10,August 9, 2017 the registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of 111,148,683 shares.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
March 31, 2017
(US dollars – Unaudited)
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheets
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash | $ | 9,451 | $ | 13,301 | $ | 6,284 | $ | 13,301 | ||||||||
| Receivables | 67 | 34 | 22 | 34 | ||||||||||||
| Inventories (Note 5) | 11,814 | 10,941 | 12,399 | 10,941 | ||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 632 | 577 | 559 | 577 | ||||||||||||
| Total current assets | 21,964 | 24,853 | 19,264 | 24,853 | ||||||||||||
| Property, plant, equipment and mineral interests (Note 6) | 138,074 | 134,550 | 140,174 | 134,550 | ||||||||||||
| Advance minimun royalties | 304 | 303 | ||||||||||||||
| Advance minimum royalties | 304 | 303 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 160,342 | $ | 159,706 | $ | 159,742 | $ | 159,706 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 5,037 | $ | 4,264 | $ | 5,864 | $ | 4,264 | ||||||||
| Interest payable (Note 9 (iii)) | 626 | 296 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest payable | 646 | 296 | ||||||||||||||
| Current portion of note payable (Note 9 (ii)) | 2,500 | - | 5,922 | - | ||||||||||||
| Current portion of loan payable (Note 16) | 6,137 | 5,656 | 6,194 | 5,656 | ||||||||||||
| Derivative liability – Related party warrants (Note 10) | 5,885 | 5,458 | 4,006 | 5,458 | ||||||||||||
| Derivative liability – Warrants (Note 10) | 1,026 | 972 | 530 | 972 | ||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | 21,211 | 16,646 | 23,162 | 16,646 | ||||||||||||
| Note payable (Note 9 (ii)) | 24,429 | 26,347 | 22,087 | 26,347 | ||||||||||||
| Loan payable (Note 16) | 10,089 | 9,494 | 8,519 | 9,494 | ||||||||||||
| Asset retirement obligation (Note 8) | 1,483 | 1,366 | 1,601 | 1,366 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liability | 12,922 | 12,922 | 12,922 | 12,922 | ||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 70,134 | 66,775 | 68,291 | 66,775 | ||||||||||||
| Temporary Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Redeemable portion of non-controlling interest (Note 9 (iv)) | 26,064 | 26,220 | 26,156 | 26,220 | ||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Common shares, no par value, unlimited shares authorized (2016 - unlimited); 111,148,683 (2016 – 111,048,683) shares issued and outstanding (Note 7) | 71,126 | 71,067 | 71,126 | 71,067 | ||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 43,686 | 43,652 | 43,737 | 43,652 | ||||||||||||
| Deficit accumulated | (89,761 | ) | (87,335 | ) | (88,800 | ) | (87,335 | ) | ||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity attributable to GQM Ltd. | 25,051 | 27,384 | 26,063 | 27,384 | ||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interest (Note 9 (iv)) | 39,093 | 39,327 | 39,232 | 39,327 | ||||||||||||
| Total Shareholders’ Equity | 64,144 | 66,711 | 65,295 | 66,711 | ||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 160,342 | $ | 159,706 | $ | 159,742 | $ | 159,706 | ||||||||
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Note 2)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)
Subsequent Events (Note 17)
Approved by the Directors:
| “Thomas M. Clay” | “Bryan A. Coates” | |
| Thomas M. Clay, Director | Bryan A. Coates, Director |
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
| 2 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of LossIncome (Loss) and Comprehensive LossIncome (Loss)
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars, except shares amounts - Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Revenues | ||||||||
| Metal Sales | $ | 14,804 | $ | - | ||||
| Cost of Sales | ||||||||
| Direct mining costs | (11,561 | ) | - | |||||
| Depreciation and depletion (Note 6) | (2,756 | ) | - | |||||
| Income from mine operations | 487 | - | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses (Note 14) | (1,416 | ) | (1,527 | ) | ||||
| Operating loss | (929 | ) | (1,527 | ) | ||||
| Other (expenses) income | ||||||||
| Loss on derivative instruments (Note 10) | (481 | ) | (7,031 | ) | ||||
| Interest expense (Note 9 (iii)) | (1,047 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||
| Interest income | 25 | 40 | ||||||
| Other expenses | (384 | ) | - | |||||
| Total other expenses | (1,887 | ) | (7,753 | ) | ||||
| Net and comprehensive loss for the period | $ | (2,816 | ) | $ | (9,280 | ) | ||
| Less: Net and comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interest for the period (Note 9 (iv)) | 390 | 355 | ||||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. for the period | $ | (2,426 | ) | $ | (8,925 | ) | ||
| Loss per share – basic (Note 15) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
| Loss per share – diluted (Note 15) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -basic | 111,080,008 | 99,928,683 | ||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | 111,080,008 | 99,928,683 | ||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 16,882 | $ | 3,464 | $ | 31,686 | $ | 3,464 | ||||||||
| Cost of Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct mining costs | (13,367 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (24,929 | ) | (3,563 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation and depletion (Note 6) | (2,742 | ) | (1,843 | ) | (5,498 | ) | (1,843 | ) | ||||||||
| Income (loss) from mine operations | 773 | (1,942 | ) | 1,259 | (1,942 | ) | ||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses (Note 14) | (712 | ) | (989 | ) | (2,128 | ) | (2,517 | ) | ||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 61 | (2,931 | ) | (869 | ) | (4,459 | ) | |||||||||
| Other income (expenses) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on derivative instruments (Note 10) | 2,375 | 1,135 | 1,894 | (5,896 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest expense (Note 9 (iii)) | (1,250 | ) | (1,793 | ) | (2,297 | ) | (2,554 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest income | 37 | 43 | 63 | 83 | ||||||||||||
| Other expenses | (31 | ) | (22 | ) | (415 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||
| Total other income (expenses) | 1,131 | (637 | ) | (755 | ) | (8,389 | ) | |||||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) for the period | $ | 1,192 | $ | (3,568 | ) | $ | (1,624 | ) | $ | (12,848 | ) | |||||
| Less: Net and comprehensive loss (income) attributable to the non-controlling interest for the period (Note 9 (iv)) | (230 | ) | 1,459 | 159 | 1,814 | |||||||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. for the period | $ | 962 | $ | (2,109 | ) | $ | (1,465 | ) | $ | (11,034 | ) | |||||
| Income (loss) per share – basic (Note 15) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||
| Income (loss) per share – diluted (Note 15) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 111,113,341 | 99,893,341 | 111,096,766 | 99,893,341 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | 111,113,341 | 99,893,341 | 111,096,766 | 99,893,341 | ||||||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
| 3 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Non-controlling Interest and Redeemable Portion of Non-controlling Interest
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars, except shares amounts- Unaudited)
| Common shares | Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Deficit Accumulated | Total Shareholders’ Equity attributable to GQM Ltd | Non- controlling Interest | Total Shareholders’ Equity | Redeemable Portion of Non- controlling Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | 99,928,683 | $ | 62,860 | $ | 43,628 | $ | (79,906 | ) | $ | 26,582 | $ | 40,686 | $ | 67,268 | $ | 27,124 | ||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | 4 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | - | - | (8,926 | ) | (8,926 | ) | (213 | ) | (9,139 | ) | (142 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2016 | 99,928,683 | $ | 62,860 | $ | 43,632 | $ | (88,832 | ) | $ | 17,660 | $ | 40,473 | $ | 58,133 | $ | 26,982 | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | 111,048,683 | $ | 71,067 | $ | 43,652 | $ | (87,335 | ) | $ | 27,384 | $ | 39,327 | $ | 66,711 | $ | 26,220 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common shares (Note 7) | 100,000 | 59 | - | - | 59 | - | 59 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | 34 | - | 34 | - | 34 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | - | - | (2,426 | ) | (2,426 | ) | (234 | ) | (2,660 | ) | (156 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2017 | 111,148,683 | $ | 71,126 | $ | 43,686 | $ | (89,761 | ) | $ | 25,050 | $ | 39,093 | $ | 64,144 | $ | 26,064 | ||||||||||||||||
| Common shares | Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Deficit Accumulated | Total Shareholders’ Equity attributable to GQM Ltd | Non- controlling Interest | Total Shareholders’ Equity | Redeemable Portion of Non- controlling Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | 99,928,683 | $ | 62,860 | $ | 43,628 | $ | (79,906 | ) | $ | 26,582 | $ | 40,686 | $ | 67,268 | $ | 27,124 | ||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | 7 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | - | - | (11,034 | ) | (11,034 | ) | (1,089 | ) | (12,123 | ) | (726 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2016 | 99,928,683 | $ | 62,860 | $ | 43,635 | $ | (90,940 | ) | $ | 15,555 | $ | 39,597 | $ | 55,152 | $ | 26,398 | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | 111,048,683 | $ | 71,067 | $ | 43,652 | $ | (87,335 | ) | $ | 27,384 | $ | 39,327 | $ | 66,711 | $ | 26,220 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of common shares | 100,000 | 59 | - | - | 59 | - | 59 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | 85 | - | 85 | - | 85 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | - | - | (1,465 | ) | (1,465 | ) | (95 | ) | (1,560 | ) | (64 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2017 | 111,148,683 | $ | 71,126 | $ | 43,737 | $ | (88,800 | ) | $ | 26,063 | $ | 39,232 | $ | 65,295 | $ | 26,156 | ||||||||||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
| 4 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Activities | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | $ | (2,816 | ) | $ | (9,280 | ) | $ | (1,624 | ) | $ | (12,848 | ) | ||||
| Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and depletion | 2,756 | 7 | 5,498 | 1,850 | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount and interest accrual | 286 | 762 | 740 | 2,401 | ||||||||||||
| Accretion expense | 30 | - | 62 | 22 | ||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative liabilities (Note 10) | 481 | 7,031 | (1,894 | ) | 5,896 | |||||||||||
| Stock based compensation | 34 | 4 | 85 | 7 | ||||||||||||
| Unrealized foreign exchange | (5 | ) | - | (7 | ) | - | ||||||||||
| Non-cash finder fees | 59 | - | 59 | - | ||||||||||||
| Changes in non-cash working capital items: | ||||||||||||||||
| Receivables | (33 | ) | (2 | ) | 12 | (3 | ) | |||||||||
| Prepaid expenses & other current assets | (55 | ) | (7 | ) | 18 | 154 | ||||||||||
| Inventory | (873 | ) | (1,622 | ) | (1,458 | ) | (6,285 | ) | ||||||||
| Accounts payable & accrued liabilities | 2,301 | 51 | 2,687 | 1,749 | ||||||||||||
| Interest payable | 626 | (144 | ) | 1,272 | - | |||||||||||
| Cash generated from (used in) operating activities | 2,791 | (3,200 | ) | 5,450 | (7,057 | ) | ||||||||||
| Investment activities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant, equipment and mineral interests | (5,236 | ) | (7,401 | ) | (9,479 | ) | (10,289 | ) | ||||||||
| Release (purchase) of reclamation financial assurance deposit | - | 902 | - | 902 | ||||||||||||
| Cash used in investing activities | (5,236 | ) | (6,499 | ) | (9,479 | ) | (9,387 | ) | ||||||||
| Financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Financing activity: | ||||||||||||||||
| Repayments of loan payable (Komatsu) | (1,405 | ) | (1,230 | ) | (2,988 | ) | (2,477 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash used in financing activities | (1,405 | ) | (1,230 | ) | (2,988 | ) | (2,477 | ) | ||||||||
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (3,850 | ) | (10,929 | ) | (7,017 | ) | (18,921 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning balance | 13,301 | 37,586 | 13,301 | 37,587 | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, ending balance | $ | 9,451 | $ | 26,657 | $ | 6,284 | $ | 18,666 | ||||||||
Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information (Note 11)
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
| 5 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 1. | Nature of Business |
Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (“Golden Queen”, “GQM Ltd.” or the “Company”) is engaged in the operation of the Soledad Mountain ProjectMine (“the Project”Mine”), located in the Mojave Mining District, Kern County, California. The Company originally used its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc. (“GQM Inc.”), to explore and develop the Project.Mine. On September 10, 2014, GQM Inc. was converted to a limited liability company, Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”). The Company entered into a Joint Venture (the “JV”) agreement with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) through its newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Holdings, Inc. (“GQM Holdings”). The JV was completed on September 15, 2014. Upon completion of the JV, both the Company, through GQM Holdings, and Gauss each owned, and continue to own, 50% of GQM LLC. In February 2015, the Company incorporated Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd. (“GQM Canada”), a wholly-owned British Columbia subsidiary, to hold the Company’s interest in GQM Holdings.
| 2. | Ability to Continue as a Going Concern |
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Golden Queen Mining Co.Co Ltd. have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP)(“US GAAP”) applicable to a going concern.
The Company generated $14.8$2.8 million and $5.5 million in revenuescash from operationsoperating activities during the three and six months ended March 31, 2017.June 30, 2017, respectively. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $89.8 million and a working capital surplusdeficit of $0.8$3.9 million at March 31,June 30, 2017.
Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. expects to have sufficient cash on hand to meet its corporate general and administrative expenditures for the next twelve months from the date of the approval of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements. However, the
The Company is required to pay $5.4$3.2 and $8.4 million and $3.1 million inof accrued interest and debt principal repaymentto the Clay Group, in total, on the three following dates: January 1, 2018, and April 1, 2018 respectively.and July 1, 2018. The Company will need to receive cash distributions from GQM LLC to service its debt and such distributions are contingent on GQM LLC’s ability to generate positive cash flows. The Company revised the mine plan in light of the six months ended June 30, 2017 results and has determined it is unlikely it will receive sufficient distributions from GQM LLC during this fiscal year to service its debt in early 2018. This situation raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Consequently, discussion with the Clay Group to restructure the reimbursement schedule have been initiated. While the Company anticipates receiving sufficient distributions from GQM LLC during this fiscal year to service itshas been successful in re-negotiating the debt in 2018, however such distributions are dependentreimbursement schedule with the Clay Group on a number of factors, including the gold price and the ability of the mine to perform according to the mine plan in 2017 and 2018. Because of the uncertainty relating to the above factors,previous occasions, there can be no assurance that sufficient distributions will be generated and paid by GQM LLC to the Company in order for it to meet its obligations when they fall due. If the distributions are not sufficient, the Company will need to either raise equity or negotiate with its debt lender a delay in principal and interest repayments.achieved going forward.
The Company’s access to the net assets of GQM LLC is determined by the Board of Managers of GQM LLC. The Board of Managers is not controlled by the Company and therefore there is no guarantee that any access to the net assets of GQM LLC would be provided to the Company in order to continue as a going concern. The Board of Managers of GQM LLC determine when and if distributions from GQM LLC are made to the holders of its membership units at their sole discretion.
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not reflect adjustments to the carrying values of the assets and liabilities, the reported revenues and expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used, that would be necessary if the company were unable to realize its assets and settle its liabilities as a going concern in the normal course of operations. Such adjustments could be material.
| 3. | Basis of Presentation |
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The accounting policies followed in preparing these condensed consolidated interim financial statements are those used by the Company as set out in the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
| 6 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 3. | Basis of Presentation (continued) |
Certain information and note disclosures normally included for annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been omitted. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In the opinion of management,Management, all adjustments considered necessary (including reclassifications and normal recurring adjustments) to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at March 31,June 30, 2017 and for all periods presented, have been included in these financial statements. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year ending December 31, 2017, or future operating periods. For further information, see the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, including the accounting policies and notes thereto.
The Company consolidates all entities in which it can vote a majority of the outstanding voting stock. In addition, it consolidates entities which meet the definition of a variable interest entity for which it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party who has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and who has an obligation to absorb losses of the entity or a right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. We consider special allocations of cash flows and preferences, if any, to determine amounts allocable to non-controlling interests. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated inon consolidation.
These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Golden Queen, a limited liability Canadian corporation (Province of British Columbia), its wholly-owned subsidiary, GQM Holdings, a US (State of California) corporation, and GQM LLC, a limited liability company in which Golden Queen has a 50% interest, through GQM Canada’s ownership of GQM Holdings. GQM LLC meets the definition of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). Golden Queen has determined it is the member of the related party group that is most closely associated with GQM LLC and, as a result, is the primary beneficiary who consolidates GQM LLC.
| 4. | Summary of Accounting Policies and Estimates and Judgements |
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and judgements have been made by Management in several areas including the accounting for the joint venture transaction and determination of the temporary and permanent non-controlling interest, the recoverability of mineral properties interests, royalty obligations, inventory valuation, asset retirement obligations, and derivative liability – warrants. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
| (i) | In July 2015, ASU No. 2015-11 was issued related to the inventory, simplifying the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company records inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value and the adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2017 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
| (ii) | In March 2016, ASU No. 2016-09 was issued related to stock-based compensation. The new guidance simplifies the accounting for stock-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for the Company’s fiscal year and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance as of January 1, 2017 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
| 7 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 4. | Summary of Accounting Policies and Estimates and Judgements (continued) |
New Accounting Policies
| (iii) | In May 2014, ASU 2014-09 was issued related to revenue from contracts with customers. The ASU was further amended in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, and May 2016 by ASU 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10 and |
In August 2015, the effective date was deferred to reporting periods, including interim periods, beginning after December 31, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is not permitted.
We are currently assessing the impact of implementation of ASU No. 201-09,2014-09, however, managementManagement does not believe it will change the point of revenue recognition or amountsamount of revenue recognized compared to how we recognize revenue under our current policies. Our revenues involve a relatively limited number of types of contracts and customers. In addition, our revenue contracts do not involve multiple types of performance obligations. Revenues from doré are recognized, and the transaction price is known, at the time the metals sold are delivered to the customer. We will finalize our assessment of the impact of ASU No. 201-09 on our revenue recognition during 2017 and assess the additional disclosure requirements under the guidance.
| (iv) | In February 2016, FASB issued ASC 842 that requires lessees to recognize lease assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. The update, which supersedes existing lease guidance, will continue to classify leases as either finance or operating, with the classification determining the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. |
The ASU will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and is applicable on a modified retrospective basis with various optional practical expedients. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.
| (v) | In August 2016, ASC guidance was issued to amend the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The new guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year and interim periods beginning December 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
| 5. | Inventories |
Inventories consist primarily of production from the Company’s operation, in varying stages of the production process and supplies and spare parts, all of which are presented at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventories of the Company are comprised of:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Stockpile inventory | $ | 407 | $ | 318 | $ | 346 | $ | 318 | ||||||||
| In-process inventory | 9,389 | 9,491 | 9,861 | 9,491 | ||||||||||||
| Dore inventory | 408 | 76 | 366 | 76 | ||||||||||||
| Supplies and spare parts | 1,610 | 1,056 | 1,826 | 1,056 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 11,814 | $ | 10,941 | $ | 12,399 | $ | 10,941 | |||||||||
| 8 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 6. | Property, Plant, Equipment and Mineral Interests |
Property, plant and equipment and mineral interest,interests, are depreciated and depleted using either the units-of-production or straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the expected life of mine. Assets under construction in progress are recorded at cost and re-allocated to its corresponding classificationcategory when they become available for use.
| Land | Mineral property interest and claims | Mine development | Machinery and equipment | Buildings and infrastructure | Construction in progress | Interest capitalized | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2015 | $ | 110 | $ | 4,459 | $ | 84,798 | $ | 28,085 | $ | 8,565 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 126,017 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | 3,777 | 9,391 | 542 | 5,674 | 19,384 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfers | 6 | (6 | ) | (42,765 | ) | 32,117 | 10,648 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,893 | $ | 4,453 | $ | 42,033 | $ | 60,202 | $ | 28,604 | $ | 542 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 145,401 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | 17 | 18 | 3,588 | 3,820 | - | 7,443 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfers | (39 | ) | (36 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | (1,344 | ) | - | - | - | (1,344 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2017 | $ | 3,910 | $ | 4,471 | $ | 41,994 | $ | 62,446 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 4,362 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 151,425 | ||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and depletion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2015 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 654 | $ | 1,462 | $ | 350 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,466 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | - | 72 | 317 | 5,666 | 2,330 | - | - | 8,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2016 | $ | - | $ | 72 | $ | 971 | $ | 7,128 | $ | 2,680 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 10,851 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | - | 61 | 558 | 1,437 | 591 | - | 109 | 2,756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | (256 | ) | - | - | - | (256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2017 | $ | - | $ | 133 | $ | 1,529 | $ | 8,309 | $ | 3,271 | $ | - | $ | 109 | $ | 13,351 | ||||||||||||||||
| Carrying values | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,893 | $ | 4,381 | $ | 41,062 | $ | 53,074 | $ | 25,924 | $ | 542 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 134,550 | ||||||||||||||||
| At March 31, 2017 | $ | 3,910 | $ | 4,338 | $ | 40,465 | $ | 54,137 | $ | 25,297 | $ | 4,362 | $ | 5,565 | $ | 138,074 | ||||||||||||||||
| Land | Mineral property interest and claims | Mine development | Machinery and equipment | Buildings and infrastructure | Construction in progress | Interest capitalized | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2015 | $ | 110 | $ | 4,459 | $ | 84,798 | $ | 28,085 | $ | 8,565 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 126,017 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | 3,777 | - | - | - | 9,391 | 542 | 5,674 | 19,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfers | 6 | (6 | ) | (42,765 | ) | 32,117 | 10,648 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,893 | $ | 4,453 | $ | 42,033 | $ | 60,202 | $ | 28,604 | $ | 542 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 145,401 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | 17 | 96 | - | 4,074 | - | 8,286 | - | 12,473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfers | - | - | (58 | ) | - | (36 | ) | - | - | (94 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | (1,344 | ) | - | - | - | (1,344 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At June 30, 2017 | $ | 3,910 | $ | 4,549 | $ | 41,975 | $ | 62,932 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 8,828 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 156,436 | ||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and depletion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2015 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 654 | $ | 1,462 | $ | 350 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,466 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | - | 72 | 317 | 5,666 | 2,330 | - | - | 8,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2016 | $ | - | $ | 72 | $ | 971 | $ | 7,128 | $ | 2,680 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 10,851 | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | - | 134 | 1,171 | 2,962 | 1,179 | - | 221 | 5,667 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disposals | - | - | - | (256 | ) | - | - | - | (256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| At June 30, 2017 | $ | - | $ | 206 | $ | 2,142 | $ | 9,834 | $ | 3,859 | $ | - | $ | 221 | $ | 16,262 | ||||||||||||||||
| Carrying values | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,893 | $ | 4,381 | $ | 41,062 | $ | 53,074 | $ | 25,924 | $ | 542 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 134,550 | ||||||||||||||||
| At June 30, 2017 | $ | 3,910 | $ | 4,343 | $ | 39,833 | $ | 53,098 | $ | 24,709 | $ | 8,828 | $ | 5,453 | $ | 140,174 | ||||||||||||||||
During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company acquired three (3)3 (2016 –one (1)) pieces– 1 piece of mining equipmentequipment) from Komatsu through financing agreements. Also, during the same periodperiods the Company disposed of two (2)2 pieces of mining equipment (2016 – $Nil). See Note 16 for further details.
| 7. | Share Capital |
The Company’s common shares outstanding are no par value, voting shares with no preferences or rights attached to them.
Common shares – 2017
On January 17, 2017, the Company issued 100,000 shares for a total of $0.06 million as finder fees which were recognized in general and administrative expenses in connection with the declaration of commercial production in December 2016.
Common shares – 2016
In July 2016, the Company completed a financing for gross proceeds of $12.1 million (C$16.1 million) consisting of 11,120,000 units at a price of $1.10 (C$1.45) per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to acquire one additional common share of the Company at a price of C$2.00 per common share until July 25, 2019.The aggregate fair value of the common share purchase warrants at the time of issuance was $2.3 million, which was recorded as a derivative liability and the Company allocated the remaining proceeds of $9.8 million to the common shares.shares (See Note 10).
| 9 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 7. | Share Capital (continued) |
The Company also issued 757,700 common share purchase warrants to brokers with the same terms as the common share purchase warrants issued with the financing units. The aggregate fair value of the common share purchase warrants issued to the brokers at the time of issuance was $0.3 million which was recorded as a derivative liability (See Note 10).
In addition, the Company incurred cash share issue costs totalling $1.2 million, which consisted of legal fees, commission and other direct financing costs.
Stock options
The Company’s current stock option plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Company in 2013 and approved by shareholders of the Company in 2013. The Plan provides a fixed number of 7,200,000 common shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to the grant of stock options. The exercise price of stock options granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), but shall not be less than the volume-weighted, average trading price of the Company’s shares on the TSXToronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) for the five (5) trading days immediately prior to the date of the grant. The expiry date of a stock option shall be the date so fixed by the Board subject to a maximum term of five (5) years. The Plan provides that the expiry date of the vested portion of a stock option will be the earlier of the date so fixed by the Board at the time the stock option is awarded and the early termination date (the “Early Termination Date”).
The Early Termination Date will be the date the vested portion of a stock option expires following the option holder ceasing to be a director, employee or consultant, as determined by the Board at the time of grant, or in the absence thereof at any time prior to the time the option holder ceases to be a director, employee or consultant, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Plan. All options granted under the 2013 Plan will be subject to such vesting requirements as may be prescribed by the TSX, if applicable, or as may be imposed by the Board. A total of 1,955,0021,395,002 (December 31, 2016 – 1,555,000) common shares were issuable pursuant to such stock options as at March 31,June 30, 2017.
The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted. In accordance with the accounting standard for employees, the compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which approximates the vesting period.
The following is a summary of stock option activity during the periodsix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016:
| Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share | |||||||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2015 | 1,070,000 | $ | 0.94 | 1,070,000 | $ | 0.94 | ||||||||||
| Options granted | 485,000 | $ | 0.66 | 485,000 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||
| Options outstanding, December 31, 2016 | 1,555,000 | $ | 0.85 | 1,555,000 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||||
| Options granted | 400,002 | $ | 0.65 | 400,002 | $ | 0.65 | ||||||||||
| Options outstanding, March 31, 2017 | 1,955,002 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||||||||
| Options forfeited | (166,667 | ) | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||||
| Options expired | (393,333 | ) | $ | 1.10 | ||||||||||||
| Options outstanding, June 30, 2017 | 1,395,002 | $ | 0.75 | |||||||||||||
On March 20, 2017, the Company granted 400,002 options to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.Officer (“CFO”). The options are exercisable at a price of $0.65 for a period of five years from the date of grant and 133,334 options vest on March 20, 2018, 133,334 options vest on March 20, 2019 and 133,334 options on March 20, 2020.
The fair valueOn March 14, 2017, the former CFO of the Company resigned. 146,667 stock options grantedwere forfeited on this date as above is calculated usingthey did not meet the following weighted average assumptions:vesting conditions. The expiry date of 393,333 stock options which vested was modified to June 14, 2017 pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement.
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Expected life (years) | 4.97 | 4.92 | ||||||
| Interest rate | 1.18 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||
| Volatility | 77.29 | % | 81.27 | % | ||||
| Dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
| 10 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 7. | Share Capital (continued) |
Stock options (continued)
These stock options were not exercised, thus expired during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The share-based compensation associated with the unvested stock options was reversed accordingly.
Upon resignation of an employee on June 19, 2017, 20,000 stock options were forfeited as they did not meet the vesting conditions. The share-based compensation associated with the unvested stock options was reversed accordingly.
The fair value of stock options granted as above is calculated using the following weighted average assumptions:
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Expected life (years) | 5.00 | 5.00 | ||||||
| Interest rate | 1.18 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||
| Volatility | 77.29 | % | 81.27 | % | ||||
| Dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company recognized $0.03$0.05 million (March 31,and $0.09 million (the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 - $0.02$0.04 million and $0.07 million) in stock-based compensation relating to employee stock options that were issued and/or had vesting terms.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31,June 30, 2017:
| Expiry Date | Number Outstanding | Number Exercisable | Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Exercise Price | Number Outstanding | Number Exercisable | Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| June 3, 2018 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 1.18 | $ | 1.16 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 0.93 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 3, 2018 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 1.43 | $ | 1.59 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 1.18 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 18, 2018 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 1.47 | $ | 1.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| September 8, 2020 | 570,000 | 523,334 | 3.44 | $ | 0.58 | 430,000 | 430,000 | 3.19 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| November 30, 2021 | 485,000 | 0 | 4.67 | $ | 0.66 | 365,000 | 0 | 4.42 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| March 20, 2022 | 400,002 | 0 | 4.97 | $ | 0.65 | 400,002 | 0 | 4.72 | $ | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2017 | 1,955,002 | 1,023,334 | 3.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2017 | 1,395,002 | 630,000 | 3.66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at March 31,June 30, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding exercisable options was $0.1 million$Nil (December, 31, 2016 - $0.4 million).
Warrants
The following is a summary of common share purchase warrants activity:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | 24,317,700 | 10,000,000 | 24,317,700 | 10,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Issued - financing units | - | 5,560,000 | - | 5,560,000 | ||||||||||||
| Issued - financing brokers(1) | - | 757,700 | - | 757,700 | ||||||||||||
| Issued - debt restructuring(1) | - | 8,000,000 | - | 8,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Balance, end of the period | 24,317,700 | 24,317,700 | 24,317,700 | 24,317,700 | ||||||||||||
(1) Non-tradable share purchase warrants.
| 11 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 7. | Share Capital (continued) |
Warrants (continued)
The following table summarizes information about share purchase warrants outstanding and exercisable at March 31,June 30, 2017:
| Expiry Date | Number Outstanding | Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Exercise Price | Number Outstanding | Remaining Contractual Life (periods) | Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||
| June 8, 2020 | 10,000,000 | 3.19 | $ | 0.95 | 10,000,000 | 2.94 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||||||||||
| July 25, 2019 | 5,560,000 | 2.32 | C$ | 2.00 | 5,560,000 | 2.07 | C$ | 2.00 | ||||||||||||||||
| July 25, 2019 | 757,700 | 2.32 | C$ | 2.00 | 757,700 | 2.07 | C$ | 2.00 | ||||||||||||||||
| November 18, 2021 | 8,000,000 | 4.65 | $ | 0.85 | 8,000,000 | 4.40 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||||||||||
| 8. | Asset Retirement |
Asset Retirement Obligation
The total asset retirement obligation as of March 31,June 30, 2017, was $1.5$1.6 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.4 million).
The Company estimated its asset retirement obligationsobligation based on its requirements to reclaim and remediate its property based on its activities to date. As at March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company estimates the primary cash outflow related to these reclamation activities will commence in 2028. Reclamation provisions are measured at the expected value of future cash flows discounted to their present value using a discount rate based on a credit adjusted risk-free interest rate of 8.7% and an inflation rate of 2.45%.
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
Asset Retirement Obligation (continued)
The following is a summary of asset retirement obligations:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 1,366 | $ | 978 | ||||
| Accretion | 30 | 90 | ||||||
| Changes in cash flow estimates | 87 | 298 | ||||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 1,483 | $ | 1,366 | ||||
| June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 1,366 | $ | 978 | ||||
| Accretion | 62 | 90 | ||||||
| Changes in cash flow estimates | 173 | 298 | ||||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 1,601 | $ | 1,366 | ||||
Reclamation Financial Assurance
The Company is required to provide the Bureau of Land Management, the State Office of Mine Reclamation and Kern County, California with a revised reclamation cost estimate annually. The financial assurance is adjusted once the cost estimate is approved. The Company’s provision for reclamation of the property is estimated each year by an independent consulting engineer. This estimate, once approved by state and county authorities, forms the basis for a cash deposit of reclamation financial assurance. The reclamation assurance provided as at March 31,June 30, 2017 wasis $1.5 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.5 million).
The Company is also required to provide the Bureau of Land Management, the State Office of Mine Reclamation and Kern County, California with a revised reclamation cost estimate annually. The financial assurance withis adjusted once the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Regional Board”)cost estimate is approved. The Company’s provision for closurereclamation of the property is estimated each year by an independent consulting engineer. This estimate, once approved by state and county authorities, forms the basis for a cash deposit of reclamation costs related to the lined impoundments, which are defined as the Stage 1 heap leach pad, the overflow pond, and the solution collection channel.financial assurance. The reclamation financial assurance estimate forprovided as of March 31,at June 30, 2017 is $1.9$1.5 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.2$1.5 million).
In addition to the above, the Company is required to obtain and maintain financial assurance for initiating and completing corrective action and remediation of a reasonably foreseeable release from the Project’sMine’s waste management units as required by the Regional Board. The reclamation financial assurance estimate for as of March 31,June 30, 2017, is $0.3 million (December 31, 2016 - $0.3 million).
| 12 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 8. | Asset Retirement Obligation and Financial Reclamation Assurance (continued) |
Asset Retirement Obligation (continued)
During 2016, the Company entered into $3.0 million in surety bond agreements in order to release its reclamation deposits. The Company pays a yearly premium of $0.1 million. Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. has provided a corporate guaranty on the surety bonds (see(See Note 12).
| 9. | Related Party Transactions |
Except as noted elsewhere in these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, related party transactions are disclosed as follows:
| (i) | Management Agreement |
During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company paid a total of $0.03 million (Threeand $0.06 million (the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2016 - $0.03)$0.03 million and $0.06 million, respectively), respectively, to the three (3) independent directors of the Company. Additionally, the Company paid $0.02 million (2016 - $Nil) for consulting services to oneBehre Dolbear, a company of its directors.which a director of Golden Queen serves in the capacity of an executive officer.
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| (ii) | Note Payable |
On December 31, 2014, the Company entered into a loan (the “December 2014 Loan”) with the Clay familyGroup for $12.5 million, due on July 1, 2015 and bore an annual interest rate of 10%. The loan was guaranteed by GQM Holdings, and secured by a pledge of the Company's interests in GQM Canada, GQM Canada’s interest in GQM Holdings and GQM Holdings' 50% interest in GQM LLC.
The Company also incurred a financing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1.0 million, of which, $0.8 million was paid on December 31, 2014 and the remaining $0.3$0.2 million was paid on January 5, 2015.
On June 8, 2015, the Company amended the December 2014 Loan to extend the maturity to December 8, 2016 and increased the principal amount from $12.5 million to $37.5 million (the “June 2015 Loan”). The Company also issued to the lenders 10,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring June 8, 2020. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.95. All other terms remained the same as the December 2014 Loan. The Company also incurred financing fees to secure the loan in the amount of $1.5 million. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this debt instrument which amounted to $0.04 million. The total legal fees were expensed as the transaction met the definition of a debt extinguishment.
On November 18, 2016, the Company repaid $12.2 million of the June 2015 Loan and accrued interest with cash on hand and the net proceeds of $10.1 million from an equity financing. The Company restructured the remaining debt with a new loan with a principal amount of $31.0 million (the “November 2016 Loan”). The new loan has a thirty-month term and an annual interest rate of 8%, payable on a quarterly basis commencing during the first quarter of 2017. Quarterly principal payments of $2.5 million commence during the first quarter of 2018, with a payment of the remaining balance at the maturity date. The first four quarterly interest payments under the November 2016 Loan can be added to the loan principal balance rather than paid in cash, at the Company’s option. The Company exercised this option on January 1, 2017.2017 and on July 1, 2017 (See Note 17).
In connection with the new loanNovember 2016 Loan the Company issued 8,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring November 21, 2021. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.85. The Company also incurred a financing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $0.9 million, all of which was paid on November 18, 2016.
The table below summarizes the activity on the November 2016 Loan:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 26,347 | $ | 36,053 | ||||
| Interest payable transferred to principal balance | 296 | 2,977 | ||||||
| Accretion of discount on loans | 286 | 1,996 | ||||||
| Capitalized financing fee and legal fees | - | (930 | ) | |||||
| Reduction of debt upon issuance of warrants | - | (3,090 | ) | |||||
| Repayment of loans and interest | - | (10,659 | ) | |||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 26,929 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| Current portion | $ | 2,500 | $ | - | ||||
| Non-current portion | $ | 24,429 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
The following table summarizes the amortization of discounts and interest on loan:
| 13 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 9. | Related Party Transactions (continued) |
| (ii) | Note Payable (continued) |
The table below summarizes the activity on the November 2016 Loan:
| June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 26,347 | $ | 36,053 | ||||
| Interest payable transferred to principal balance | 922 | 2,977 | ||||||
| Accretion of discount on loans | 740 | 1,996 | ||||||
| Capitalized financing fee and legal fees | - | (930 | ) | |||||
| Reduction of debt upon issuance of warrants | - | (3,090 | ) | |||||
| Repayment of loans and interest | - | (10,659 | ) | |||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 28,009 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| Current portion | $ | 5,922 | $ | - | ||||
| Non-current portion | $ | 22,087 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| (iii) | Amortization of Discounts and Interest Expense |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Accretion of the Nov 2016 Loan discount | $ | 286 | $ | - | ||||
| Interest expense related to the Nov 2016 Loan | 626 | - | ||||||
| Interest expense related to Komatsu financial loans(1) | 135 | 167 | ||||||
| Accretion of the June 2015 Loan discount | - | 606 | ||||||
| Interest expense related to the June 2015 Loan | - | 994 | ||||||
| Accretion of discount and interest on loan | $ | 1,047 | $ | 1,767 | ||||
The following table summarizes the amortization of discounts and interest on loan:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Accretion of the Nov 2016 Loan discount | $ | 454 | $ | - | �� | $ | 740 | $ | - | |||||||
| Interest expense related to the Nov 2016 Loan | 646 | - | 1,272 | - | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense related to Komatsu financial loans(1) | 150 | 154 | 285 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| Accretion of the June 2015 Loan discount | - | 626 | - | 1,232 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense related to the June 2015 Loan | - | 1,013 | - | 2,008 | ||||||||||||
| Accretion of discount and interest on loan | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 3,560 | ||||||||
The Company’s loans were contracted to fund significant development costs.
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Accretion of discounts and interest on loan(1) | $ | 1,047 | $ | 1,767 | ||||
| Less: Interest costs capitalized(2) | - | (1,005 | ) | |||||
| Interest expense | $ | 1,047 | $ | 762 | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Accretion of discounts and interest on loan(1) | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 3,560 | ||||||||
| Less: Interest costs capitalized(2) | - | - | - | (1,006 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 2,554 | ||||||||
(1) Komatsu is not a related party and has only been included in the above table to reconcile the total interest expense incurred for the period to the amounts capitalized and expensed.
(2) Interest capitalization ended on March 31, 2016 because the mine went into production on April 1, 2016.
| (1) | Komatsu is not a related party and has only been included in the above table to reconcile the total interest expense incurred for the period to the amounts capitalized and expensed. |
| (2) | Interest capitalization ended on March 31, 2016 because the mine went into production on April 1, 2016. |
| (iv) | Joint Venture Transaction |
On September 15, 2014, the Company closed the Joint Venture Transaction with Gauss resulting in both parties owning a 50% interest in the Project.Mine. Pursuant to the Joint Venture Transaction, Golden Queen converted its wholly-owned subsidiary GQM Inc., the entity developing the Project,Mine, into a California limited liability company named GQM LLC. On closing of the transaction, Gauss acquired 50% of GQM LLC by investing $110 million cash in exchange for newly issued membership units of GQM LLC. GQM Holdings, a newly incorporated subsidiary of the Company, holds the other 50% of GQM LLC.
| 14 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 9. | Related Party Transactions (continued) |
| (iv) | Joint Venture Transaction (continued) |
Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (NYSE: LUK) (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family,Group, a shareholder group which collectively owned approximately 27% of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Queen (the “Clay Group”) at the time of the transaction. Gauss is owned 70.51% by Gauss Holdings LLC (“Gauss Holdings”, Leucadia’s investment entity) and 29.49% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity). Pursuant to the transaction, Leucadia was paid a transaction fee of $2.0 million and $0.3 million was paid to Auvergne through GQM LLC in 2014. The Company expensed these transaction costs.
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
Variable Interest Entity
In accordance with ASC 810-10-30, the Company has determined that GQM LLC meets the definition of a VIE and that the Company is part of a related party group that, in its entirety, would meet the definition of a primary beneficiary. Although no individual variable interest holder individually meets the definition of a primary beneficiary in the absence of the related party group, Golden Queen has determined it is considered the member of the related party group most closely associated with GQM LLC. As a result, the Company has condensed consolidated interim 100% of the accounts of GQM LLC in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements, while presenting a non-controlling interest portion representing the 50% interest of Gauss in GQM LLC on its balance sheet. A portion of the non-controlling interest has been presented as temporary equity on the Company’s balance sheet representing the initial value of the non-controlling interest that could potentially be redeemable by Gauss in the future.
The Company has presented Gauss’ ownership in GQM LLC as a non-controlling interest amount on the balance sheet within the equity section. However, there are terms in the agreement that providesprovide for the exit from the investment in GQM LLC for an initial member whose interest in GQM LLC becomes less than 20%.
If a member becomes less than a 20% interest holder, its remaining unit interest will (ultimately) be terminated through one of three (3) events at the non-diluted member’s option:
| a. | Through conversion to a net smelter royalty (“NSR”); |
| b. | Through a buy-out (at fair value) by the non-diluted member; or |
| c. | Through a sale process by which the diluted member’s interest is sold |
The net assets of GQM LLC as of March 31,June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 are as follows:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Assets, GQM LLC | $ | 152,976 | $ | 151,802 | $ | 152,934 | $ | 151,802 | ||||||||
| Liabilities, GQM LLC | (22,663 | ) | (20,710 | ) | (22,157 | ) | (20,710 | ) | ||||||||
| Net assets, GQM LLC | $ | 130,313 | $ | 131,092 | $ | 130,777 | $ | 131,092 | ||||||||
Included in the assets above, is $9.4$5.0 million (December 31, 2016 - $11.1 million) in cash held as at March 31,June 30, 2017. The cash in GQM LLC is directed specifically to fund capital expenditures required to continue with production and settle GQM LLC’s obligations. The liabilities of GQM LLC do not have recourse to the general credit of Golden Queen except for two (2)2 mining drill loans and $3.0 million in surety bond agreements.
| 15 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 9. | Related Party Transactions (continued) |
| (iv) | Joint Venture Transaction (continued) |
Non-Controlling Interest
The carrying value of the non-controlling interest is adjusted for net income and loss, distributions and contributions pursuant to ASC 810-10 based on the same percentage allocation used to calculate the initial book value of temporary equity.
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) in GQM LLC | $ | 462 | $ | (2,919 | ) | $ | (317 | ) | $ | (3,628 | ) | |||||
| Non-controlling interest percentage | 50 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | ||||||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest | $ | 230 | $ | (1,459 | ) | $ | (159 | ) | $ | (1,814 | ) | |||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to permanent non-controlling interest | $ | 138 | $ | (876 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | $ | (1,088 | ) | |||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to temporary non-controlling interest | $ | 92 | $ | (584 | ) | $ | (64 | ) | $ | (726 | ) | |||||
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Net and comprehensive loss in GQM LLC | $ | (779 | ) | $ | (709 | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interest percentage | 50 | % | 50 | % | ||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest | $ | (390 | ) | $ | (355 | ) | ||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to permanent non-controlling interest | $ | (234 | ) | $ | (213 | ) | ||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to temporary non-controlling interest | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | ||
| Permanent Non- Controlling Interest | Temporary Non- Controlling Interest | Permanent Non- Controlling Interest | Temporary Non- Controlling Interest | |||||||||||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, December 31, 2016 | $ | 39,327 | $ | 26,220 | $ | 39,327 | $ | 26,220 | ||||||||
| Net and comprehensive loss for the period | (234 | ) | (156 | ) | (95 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, March 31, 2017 | $ | 39,093 | $ | 26,064 | ||||||||||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, June 30, 2017 | $ | 39,232 | $ | 26,156 | ||||||||||||
Dilution of Interest in Subsidiary
As a result of the Joint Venture Transaction, the Company’s interest in GQM LLC was diluted from 100% to 50% and ordinarily, the Company would recognize gain on dilution with the book value of the investment in GQM LLC increasing as well. However, since the transaction was with a related party and the Company retained control, the excess has not been recognized in net income but rather has been recorded in equity as an increase to APICAdditional Paid-in Capital (“APIC”) based on guidance provided in ASC 810-10-55-4D and -4E.
The deferred tax liability resulted from the increase in the book value over tax value of the investment in GQM LLC.
Capital Contribution Agreement
Pursuant to the Joint Venture Transaction, GQM Holdings made a single capital contribution to GQM LLC of $12.5 million on June 15, 2015. Gauss funded an amount equal to GQM Holdings’ capital contribution to GQM LLC. Both partners maintain their 50% ownership of the Project.Mine.
| (v) | Revolving credit |
On May 23, 2017, GQM LLC entered into a revolving credit facility of $5 million with Gauss Holdings and Auvergne LLC. The revolving credit is available until May 23, 2018 and bears a 12% simple annual interest. GQM LLC paid a closing fee of $0.1 million which was classified as prepaid expenses and other current assets. $0.02 million of the closing fee was amortized during three and six months ended June 30, 2017. As at June 30, 2017, no amounts had been drawn under this facility.
| 16 | |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 10. | Derivative Liabilities |
Share Purchase Warrants – Clay loans (Related Party)
On June 8, 2015, the Company issued 10,000,000 share purchase warrants to the Clay familyGroup in connection with the June 2015 Loan. The share purchase warrants are exercisable until June 8, 2020 at an exercise price of $0.95. Included in the June 2015 Loan agreement was an anti-dilution provision. If the Company were to complete a financing at a share price lower than the exercise price of the share purchase warrants, the exercise price of the share purchase warrants would be adjusted to match the price at which the financing was completed.
On November 18, 2016, the Company issued 8,000,000 share purchase warrants to the Clay familyGroup in connection with the November 2016 Loan. The share purchase warrants are exercisable until November 18, 2021 at an exercise price of $0.85. Included in the November 2016 Loan agreement was an anti-dilution provision. If the Company were to complete a financing at a share price lower than the exercise price of the share purchase warrants, the exercise price of the share purchase warrants would be adjusted to match the price at which the financing was completed.
The share purchase warrants meet the definition of a derivative liability instrument as the exercise price is not a fixed price as described above. Therefore, the settlement feature does not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria outlined in ASC 815-40-15.
The fair value of the derivative liabilities related to the share purchase warrants as at March 31,June 30, 2017 is $5.9$4.0 million (December 31, 2016 - $5.5 million). The derivative liabilities were calculated using the binomial and the Black-Scholes pricing valuation models with the following assumptions:
| Warrants related to June 2015 Loan | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.87 | % | 0.84 | % | 1.17 | % | 0.84%. | |||||||||
| Expected life of derivative liability | 3.19 years | 3.44 years | 2.94 years | 3.44 years | ||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | 73.66 | % | 78.79 | % | 76.60 | % | 78.79 | % | ||||||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| Warrants related to November 2016 Loan | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.12 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.11 | % | ||||||||
| Expected life of derivative liability | 4.65 years | 4.89 years | 4.40 years | 4.89 years | ||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | 88.21 | % | 77.21 | % | 79.58 | % | 77.21 | % | ||||||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
The change in the derivative share purchase warrants is as follows:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 5,458 | $ | 2,498 | $ | 5,458 | $ | 2,498 | ||||||||
| Fair value at inception | - | 3,090 | - | 3,090 | ||||||||||||
| Change in fair value | 427 | (130 | ) | (1,452 | ) | (130 | ) | |||||||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 5,885 | $ | 5,458 | $ | 4,006 | $ | 5,458 | ||||||||
| 17 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 10. | Derivative Liabilities (continued) |
Share Purchase Warrants – July 2016 financing
On July 25, 2016, the Company issued a total of 6,317,700 share purchase warrants in connection with the July 2016 financing with an exercise price of C$2.00. In accordance with the guidance in ASC 815-40-15, the share purchase warrants met the criteria of a derivative instrument liability because they were exercisable in a currency other than the functional currency of the Company and thus did not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria of that guidance. As a result, the Company was required to separately account for the share purchase warrants as derivative instrument liabilities recorded at fair value and marked-to-market each period with the changes in the fair value each period charged or credited to income.
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
Share Purchase Warrants – July 2016 financing (continued)
As at March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company had re-measured the share purchase warrants and determined the fair value of the derivative liability to be $1.0$0.5 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.0 million) using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.09 | % | 0.84 | % | ||||
| Expected life of derivative liability in years | 2.07 years | 2.56 years | ||||||
| Expected volatility | 76.01 | % | 79.40 | % | ||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.87 | % | 0.84 | % | ||||
| Expected life of derivative liability in years | 2.32 years | 2.56 years | ||||||
| Expected volatility | 77.18 | % | 79.40 | % | ||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
The change in the derivative share purchase warrants is as follows:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Fair value of warrants issued | $ | 972 | $ | 2,701 | $ | 972 | $ | 2,701 | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants | 54 | (1,729 | ) | (442 | ) | (1,729 | ) | |||||||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 1,026 | $ | 972 | $ | 530 | $ | 972 | ||||||||
| 11. | Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
| Interest on loan payable | $ | 285 | $ | 323 | ||||
| Non-cash financing and investing activities: | ||||||||
| Common shares issued as part of a management agreement | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Asset retirement costs charged to mineral property interests | $ | 173 | $ | 171 | ||||
| Mining equipment acquired through issuance of debt | $ | 2,551 | $ | 295 | ||||
| Mineral property expenditures included in accounts payable | $ | 1,081 | $ | 708 | ||||
| Interest cost capitalized to mineral property interests | $ | - | $ | 839 | ||||
| Inventory expenditures included in accounts payable | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
| Non-cash finder fees | $ | 59 | $ | - | ||||
| Non-cash amortization of discount and interest expense | $ | 740 | $ | 1,232 | ||||
| Interest payable converted to principal balance | $ | 922 | $ | 1,964 | ||||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
| Interest on loan payable | $ | 135 | $ | 144 | ||||
| Non-cash financing and investing activities: | ||||||||
| Asset retirement costs charged to mineral property interests | $ | 87 | $ | 97 | ||||
| Mining equipment acquired through issuance of debt | $ | 2,481 | $ | 295 | ||||
| Mineral property expenditures included in accounts payable | $ | 1,524 | $ | 2,311 | ||||
| Interest cost capitalized to mineral property interests | $ | - | $ | 839 | ||||
| Inventory expenditures included in accounts payable | $ | - | $ | 867 | ||||
| Non-cash finder fess | $ | 59 | $ | - | ||||
| Non-cash amortization of discount and interest expense | $ | 286 | $ | 606 | ||||
| Interest payable converted to principal balance | $ | 296 | $ | 975 | ||||
| 18 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 12. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Royalties
The Company has acquired a number of mineral properties outright. It has acquired exclusive rights to explore, develop and mine other portions of the ProjectMine under various mining lease agreements with landowners. Royalty amount due to each landholder over the life of the ProjectMine varies with each property.
Compliance with Environmental Regulations
The Company’s exploration and development activities are subject to laws and regulations controlling not only the exploration and mining of mineral properties, but also the effect of such activities on the environment. Compliance with such laws and regulations may necessitate additional capital outlays or affect the economics of a project,mine, and cause changes or delays in the Company’s activities.
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
Corporate Guaranties
The Company has provided corporate guaranties for two (2) of GQM LLC’s mining drill loans. The Company has also provided corporate a guaranty for GQM LLC’s surety bonds.
| 13. | Financial Instruments |
Fair Value Measurements
All financial assets and financial liabilities are recorded at fair value on initial recognition. Transaction costs are expensed when they are incurred, unless they are directly attributable to the acquisition of qualifying assets, in which case they are added to the costs of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale.
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
| Level 1 | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
| Level 2 | Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; |
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). |
| March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – Related Party (Note 10) | $ | 5,885 | $ | - | $ | 5,885 | $ | - | ||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – (Note 10) | 1,026 | - | 1,026 | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | 6,911 | $ | - | $ | 6,911 | $ | - | |||||||||
| 19 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 13. | Financial Instruments (continued) |
Fair Value Measurements (continued)
| June 30, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – Related Party (Note 10) | $ | 4,006 | $ | - | $ | 4,006 | $ | - | ||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – (Note 10) | 530 | - | 530 | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | 4,536 | $ | - | $ | 4,536 | $ | - | |||||||||
| December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – Related Party (Note 10) | $ | 5,458 | $ | - | $ | 5,458 | $ | - | ||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – (Note 10) | 972 | - | 972 | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | 6,430 | $ | - | $ | 6,430 | $ | - | |||||||||
Under fair value accounting, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value measurement of the financial instruments above use observable inputs in option price models such as the binomial and the Black-Scholes valuation models.
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the Company by failing to discharge its obligations. To mitigate exposure to credit risk on financial assets the Company has established policies to ensure liquidity of funds and ensure counterparties demonstrate minimum acceptable credit worthiness.
The Company maintains its US Dollar and Canadian Dollar cash in bank accounts with major financial institutions with high credit standings. Cash deposits held in the United States are insured by the FDICFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) for up to $0.3 million and Canadian Dollar cash deposits held in Canada are insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (“CDIC”) for up to C$0.1 million.
| 20 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
Certain United States and Canadian bank accounts held by the Company exceed these federally insured limits or are uninsured as they relate to US Dollar deposits held in Canadian financial institutions. As of March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company’s cash balances held in United States and Canadian financial institutions include $9.5$6.3 million, which are not fully insured by the FDIC or CDIC. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts and management believes that using major financial institutions with high credit ratings mitigates the credit risk in cash.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company holds 93%98% of its cash in bank deposit accounts with a single major financial institution. The interest rates received on these balances may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash balances during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 a 1% decrease in interest rates would have reduced the interest income for 2017 to aan immaterial amount.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Certain purchases of corporate overhead expendituresitems are denominated in Canadian Dollar. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our operations. Specifically, the appreciation of the Canadian Dollar against the US Dollar may result in an increase in the Canadian operating expenses in US dollar terms. As of March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company maintained the majority of its cash balance in US Dollar. The Company currently does not engage in any currency hedging activities.
| 13. | Financial Instruments (continued) |
Commodity Price Risk
The Company’s primary business activity is the developmentoperation of the open pit, gold and silver, heap leach project on the Project.Mine. Decreases in the price of either of these metals from current levels has the potential to negatively impact the future viability of the Project.Mine.
| 14. | General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses are incurred to support the administration of the business that are not directly related to production. Significant components of general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following:
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Audit, legal and professional fees | $ | 288 | $ | 774 | $ | 108 | $ | 197 | $ | 396 | $ | 972 | ||||||||||||
| Salaries and benefits and director fees | 560 | 342 | 140 | 395 | 700 | 737 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory fees and licenses | 53 | 22 | 17 | 60 | 70 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance | 133 | 124 | 114 | 116 | 247 | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate administration | 382 | 265 | 333 | 221 | 715 | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 1,416 | $ | 1,527 | $ | 712 | $ | 989 | $ | 2,128 | $ | 2,517 | |||||||||||||
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 15. |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Numerator: | ||||||||
| Net loss attributable to the shareholders of the Company - numerator for basic and diluted LPS | $ | (2,426 | ) | $ | (8,925 | ) | ||
| Denominator: | ||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 111,080,008 | 99,893,341 | ||||||
| Loss per share – basic and diluted | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Numerator: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net gain (loss) attributable to the shareholders of the Company - numerator for basic and diluted LPS | $ | 962 | $ | (2,109 | ) | $ | (1,465 | ) | $ | (11,034 | ) | |||||
| Denominator: | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -basic and diluted | 111,113,341 | 99,893,341 | 111,096,766 | 99,893,341 | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) per share – basic and diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | |||||
Weighted average number of shares for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 excludes 1,955,0021,395,002 options (March 31,(June 30, 2016 -1,070,000)- 1,070,000) and 24,317,700 warrants (March 31,(June 30, 2016 – 10,000,000) that were antidilutive.
| 16. | Loan Payable |
During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company sold two (2) (December 31, 2016 –Nil) pieces of equipment with a net book value of $1.0 million in consideration for settlement of two (2) loans by $0.6 million plus $0.1 million in cash. The Company also booked $0.3 million as a loss in disposition of fixed assets.
During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company entered into three (3) new loan agreements for a total of $3.8 million for the acquisition of three (3) (December 31, 2016 –two (2))– two) pieces of mining equipment from Komatsu.
| 22 | P a g e |
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| 16. | Loan Payable (continued) |
As at March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the finance agreement balances are as follows:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 15,150 | $ | 18,373 | $ | 15,150 | $ | 18,373 | ||||||||
| Additions | 3,737 | 2,047 | 3,737 | 2,047 | ||||||||||||
| Down payments and taxes | (700 | ) | (264 | ) | (700 | ) | (264 | ) | ||||||||
| Settlements | (556 | ) | - | (485 | ) | - | ||||||||||
| Principal repayments | (1,405 | ) | (5,006 | ) | (2,989 | ) | (5,006 | ) | ||||||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 16,226 | $ | 15,150 | $ | 14,713 | $ | 15,150 | ||||||||
| Current portion | $ | 6,137 | $ | 5,656 | $ | 6,194 | $ | 5,656 | ||||||||
| Non-current portion | $ | 10,089 | $ | 9,494 | $ | 8,519 | $ | 9,494 | ||||||||
For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company made total down payments of $0.7 million (2016 - $0.3 million). The down payments consist of the sales tax on the assets and a 10% payment of the pre-tax purchase price. All of the loan agreements are for a term of four (4) years, except two (2) which are for three (3) years, and are secured by the underlying asset except for two (2) mining drill loans for which GQM Ltd. has provided a corporate guarantee. Interest rates range from 0.00% to 4.50% with monthly payments in the range of $0.005 to $0.03 million.
The following table outlines the principal payments to be made for each of the remaining years:
| Years | Principal Payments | |||
| 2017 | 6,137 | |||
| 2018 | 6,142 | |||
| 2019 | 3,118 | |||
| 2020 | 829 | |||
| Total | $ | 16,226 | ||
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
(amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars - Unaudited)
| Years | Principal Payments | |||
| 2017 | $ | 6,194 | ||
| 2018 | 5,899 | |||
| 2019 | 2,024 | |||
| 2020 | 596 | |||
| Total | $ | 14,713 | ||
| 17. | Subsequent Events |
On April 1st,July 1, 2017, the Company was to make a quarterly interest payment on the November 2016 loan. In accordance with the terms of the November 2016 loan agreement, the Company chose to exercise its right to add the interest owed on April 1st,July 1, 2017 to the principal balance. The principal balance of the loan was increased by $0.6 million.
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
The following discussion of the operating results and financial condition of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (“Golden Queen”, “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is as at May 10,August 9, 2017 and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the Company for the quarterthree and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and the notes thereto.
The information in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is prepared in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and all amounts herein are in thousands of US dollars unless otherwise noted.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements, which relate to the intent, belief and current expectations of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions and parameters used in the feasibility study referenced in this report. These forward-looking statements are based upon numerous assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include among other things the receipt and compliance with the terms of required approvals and permits, results of operations and commodity prices. In addition, projected mining results, including quantity of ore, grade, production rates, and recovery rates, are subject to numerous risks normally associated with mining activity of the nature described in this report and in the feasibility study, and as a result actual results may differ substantially from projected results. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statements were made.
Cautionary Note to US Investors
We advise US investors that the mineral reserve estimates disclosed in this report have been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulations and may not qualify as “reserves” under the SEC Industry Guide 7.Accordingly, information concerning mineral resources and reserves set forth herein may not be comparable with information presented by companies using only US standards in their public disclosure.
Mr. Peter A. Herrera, CPG is a qualified person for the purposes of NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical information in this Form 10-Q.
The Soledad Mountain ProjectMine
Overview
Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (“Golden Queen”, “GQM Ltd.” or the “Company”) is engaged in the operation of the Soledad Mountain Mine (“the Mine”), located in the Mojave Mining District, Kern County, California. The Company is an emerging goldoriginally used its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc. (“GQM Inc.”), to explore and silver producer utilizing an open pit, heap leach operationdevelop the Mine. On September 10, 2014, GQM Inc. was converted to a limited liability company, Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”). The Company entered into a Joint Venture (the “JV”) agreement with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) through its newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Holdings, Inc. (“GQM Holdings”). The JV was completed on its Soledad Mountain property,September 15, 2014. Upon completion of the JV, both the Company, through GQM Holdings, and Gauss each owned, and continue to own, 50% of GQM LLC. In February 2015, the Company incorporated Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd. (“GQM Canada”), a wholly-owned British Columbia subsidiary, to hold the Company’s interest in GQM Holdings. The Mine is located just outside the town of Mojave in Kern County in southern California. The Soledad Mountain Project (the “Project”)Mine utilizes conventional open pit mining methods and the cyanide heap leach and Merrill-Crowe processes to recover gold and silver from crushed, agglomerated ore.
The Project is held by Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”), a California limited liability corporation. The Company holds a 50% interest in GQM LLC, with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) holding the remaining 50%. Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (NYSE: LUK) (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family (the “Clay Group”). Gauss is owned 70.51% by Gauss Holdings LLC (Leucadia’s investment entity) and 29.49% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne,” the Clay Group’s investment entity). GQM LLC is created as a joint venture pursuant to the terms of an amended and restated limited liability company agreement dated September 15, 2014 (the “Joint Venture”).
Please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K dated March 15, 2017 for information on the Project and the Joint Venture.
Highlights
The Mine produced a total of 12,632 ounces of gold and 51,920 ounces of silver during the second quarter of 2017. GQM LLC recorded revenue of $16.9 million during this period. Operating costs for firstwere at $13.48 per ton processed, which is lower than the previous quarter, werewhich was $16.08 per ton processed. Mining has steadilyThe reduction in costs is a result of an improved utilization rate and increased tonnage from the mine in addition to the reduced downtime and total tons moved now averages over 50K tons per day. This was accomplished with the addition of two (2) new haul trucks and will be further enhanced with the addition of a front shovel in August. Processing is working to reduce down-time and increase throughput by improving the efficiency of the feeders below the coarse ore stockpile and maximizing the efficiency of the cone liners of the Secondary Crusher. Process maintenance costs are still higher than anticipated due to higher wear.increased efficiency.
| 24 | P a g e |
A total of 4.1mm4.7 million tons of ore and waste were mined duringwithin the firstsecond quarter, including 852k1.0 million tons of ore.ore; tracking in-line with the budgeted projection. Mining continuedcontinues in the North-WestNorthwest pit and the Main Pit Phasepit, phase 1. Mining operations are increasing in the East Pit and stripping continues in that area. The first ore is expected in the fourth quarter of 2017 with over 70% of the ore for the plant in the first quarter of 2018 will be suppliedwaste from the East Pit.pit is ongoing in an effort to prepare the area for ore mining later in 2017.
A total of 791k1.03 million tons were processed and stacked on the Leach Pad in the first quarter of 2017 at anleach pad. The quarter’s daily average grade of 0.0186 ounces per ton. The average grade of ore stacked in the fourth quarter of 2016 was 0.0146 ounces per ton.
The porosity and the permeability of the ore on the heap-leach pad continue to be very good. Side-slope leaching on the pad continues to be a priority and solution percolation11,273 tons, improving from the second lift through the first lift has been without problems.
GQMC produced a totalprevious quarter average of 11,406 ounces of gold10,200 tons. The phase 2 leach pad was completed and 64,581 ounces of silver and sold 11,160 ounces of gold and 62,095 ounces of silver the first quarter. Aggregate sales commenced this quarter.
Construction of the second phase of the Leach Pad startedplaced in the first quarter. The project is expected to be completedservice in July of 2017.late July.
The cash balance as at the end of MarchJune 30, 2017 was $9.4 mm.$6.3 million. Currently there are 199 employees.a total of 202 employees on site.
Results of Operations
The following are the results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, and the corresponding periodperiods ended March 31,June 30, 2016.
| 31-Mar-17 | 31-Mar-16 | Variance | ||||||||||||
| Mining(1) | ||||||||||||||
| Ore mined | k ton | 852 | 291 | 193 | % | |||||||||
| Ore mined | k tonnes | 773 | 264 | 193 | % | |||||||||
| Waste mined | k ton | 3,230 | 956 | 238 | % | |||||||||
| Waste mined | k tonnes | 2,930 | 841 | 248 | % | |||||||||
| Total mined | k ton | 4,082 | 1,218 | 235 | % | |||||||||
| Total mined | k tonnes | 3,703 | 1,105 | 235 | % | |||||||||
| Strip ratio | waste:ore | 3.8 | 3.3 | 15 | % | |||||||||
| Processing(1) | ||||||||||||||
| Ore processed | k ton | 791 | 362 | 119 | % | |||||||||
| Ore processed | k tonnes | 718 | 328 | 119 | % | |||||||||
| Average ore processed gold grade | ozpt | 0.019 | 0.008 | 133 | % | |||||||||
| Average ore processed gold grade | gpt | 0.640 | 0.274 | 133 | % | |||||||||
| Average ore processed silver grade | ozpt | 0.232 | 0.292 | -20 | % | |||||||||
| Average ore process silver grade | gpt | 7.969 | 10.011 | -20 | % | |||||||||
| Gold loaded on pad | contained oz | 14,718 | 2,982 | 394 | % | |||||||||
| Silver loaded on pad | contained oz | 184,115 | 82,792 | 122 | % | |||||||||
| Average ore processing throughput | ton per day | 8,821 | 3,973 | 122 | % | |||||||||
| Average ore processing throughput | tonne per day | 8,002 | 3,604 | 122 | % | |||||||||
| Gold produced | oz | 11,406 | 447 | 2452 | % | |||||||||
| Silver produced | oz | 64,581 | 4,002 | 1514 | % | |||||||||
| Financial (1) | ||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 14,804 | - | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Income from mine operations | $ | 487 | - | 100 | % | |||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | $ | (1,416 | ) | (1,527 | ) | -7 | % | |||||||
| Total other income (expenses) | $ | (1,887 | ) | (7,753 | ) | -76 | % | |||||||
| Net and comprehensive (loss) income for the year | $ | (2,816 | ) | (9,280 | ) | -70 | % | |||||||
| Net and comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. | $ | (2,426 | ) | (8,925 | ) | -73 | % | |||||||
| Average realized gold price(2) | $/oz | 1,228 | - | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Average realized silver price(2) | $/oz | 17.59 | - | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Total cash costs - net of by product credits(2) | $/oz | 1,013 | - | 100 | % | |||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs - net of by product credits(2) | $/oz | 1,724 | - | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||
| 30-Jun-17 | 30-Jun-16 | 30-Jun-17 | 30-Jun-16 | |||||||||||||||
| Mining - Key Metrics(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ore mined | k ton | 1,010 | 660 | 1,862 | 951 | |||||||||||||
| Waste mined: ore mined ratio | ore mined ratio | 3.7:1 | 1.8:1 | 3.7:1 | 2.3:1 | |||||||||||||
| Gold grade placed | oz/ton | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.017 | 0.010 | |||||||||||||
| Silver grade placed | oz/ton | 0.201 | 0.040 | 0.215 | 0.311 | |||||||||||||
| Gold sold | oz | 12,653 | 2,362 | 23,813 | 2,482 | |||||||||||||
| Silver sold | oz | 53,514 | 26,500 | 115,609 | 27,500 | |||||||||||||
| EBITDA margin(2) | % | 19.81 | % | nm | 18.06 | % | nm | |||||||||||
| Off-site costs(2) | $/t placed | 0.71 | 0.19 | 0.77 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||
| Total cash costs | $/t placed | 13.48 | 12.13 | 14.61 | 13.61 | |||||||||||||
| Apparent cumulative recovery - gold(2) | % | 68.0 | % | 37.5 | % | 68.0 | % | 37.5 | % | |||||||||
| Apparent cumulative recovery - silver(2) | % | 25.3 | % | 13.4 | % | 25.3 | % | 13.4 | % | |||||||||
| Financial(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 16,882 | 3,464 | 31,686 | 3,464 | |||||||||||||
| Income from mine operations | $ | 773 | (1,942 | ) | 1,259 | (1,942 | ) | |||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | $ | (712 | ) | (989 | ) | (2,128 | ) | (2,517 | ) | |||||||||
| Total other income (expenses) | $ | 1,131 | (637 | ) | (755 | ) | (8,389 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 1,192 | (3,568 | ) | (1,624 | ) | (12,848 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. | $ | 962 | (2,109 | ) | (1,465 | ) | (11,034 | ) | ||||||||||
| Average realized gold price(2) | $/oz sold | 1,262 | 1,276 | 1,246 | 1,214 | |||||||||||||
| Average realized silver price(2) | $/oz sold | 17.10 | 17.02 | 17.37 | 16.40 | |||||||||||||
| Total cash costs - net of by product credits(2) | $/Au oz produced | 1,038 | 1,580 | 1,016 | 1,580 | |||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs - net of by product credits(2) | $/Au oz produced | 1,427 | 1,921 | 1,552 | 1,921 | |||||||||||||
| (1) | For accounting purposes, the transition to the production phase commenced on April 1, 2016. As such, comparative figures for certain measures or data are not available or are not meaningful. |
| (2) | Total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, EBITDA margin, apparent cumulative recovery and |
Operating Results
The first quarter of 2017 ore production was 6% under budget while gold production was 3% under budget. A total of 852K tons of ore were mined in the first quarter with a strip ratio of 3.8 waste to ore. This compares to 291K tons of ore at a strip ratio of 3.3 in the first quarter of 2016 when the mine had not yet achieved commercial production. The year over year comparison is biased by the fact that the mine was still in development stage in the first quarter of 2016. The higher production and strip ratio are a result of increased mining activity and the requirement to pre-strip the East pit.
| 25 | P a g e |
Mining continuedThe Company placed 1.02 million of ore on the pad in three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 0.79 million of ore in three months ended March 31, 2017. The cash costs did not increase at the Northwest Pitsame rate as ore mined, therefore the cash costs per ton decreased. See the Non-GAAP financial performance measures section below.
Strip ratio and gold grade for three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were not representative of the Main Pit, Phase-1 during the first quarter. The roadlife-of-mine averages due to the East pit was completed late incommencement of production on April 1, 2016 and the stripping of the East Pit is currently underway.
The grade reconciliationlimited equipment and crew available during these periods compared with the Block-Model for bothperiods of 2017. Notwithstanding the North West Pit and Main Pit is on-going. Generally, the mine produces more gold per bench than predicted by our model at a lower grade. The higher grade minedstrip ratio in the first quarter of this year versusthree and six months ended June 30, 2017, contributing to the first quarter in 2016 isslightly higher total cost per ton placed, the result of our target grade program; our operators are more successful in grouping the ore on the benches into minable chunks that average a higher grade.
The in-fill drilling program of the East Pit was completed late in 2016gold ounces produced and the information is being incorporated into the Block Model. No additional drilling is currently being contemplated in 2017.
Processing and Production
The crushing-screening plant daily average in the first quarter of 2017 was 8,890 tonssold have contributed to lower costs per operating day. In April, the daily average was 10,168 tons per operating day. The company experienced a mechanical problem with a gear-box on the overland conveyor during the first quarter that affected the throughput. Operating efficiency has been improving and the issues associated with high wear are being addressed. The performance of the HPGR system has exceeded expectations.
As at the end of April 2017, a total of 3,773K tons are loaded on the heap-leach pad. Agglomerate quality was very good in the first quarter of 2017 and the porosity and permeability of the heap-leach pad is extremely high. The apparent recovery project to date is approximately 66%.
A total of 34,480 ouncesounce of gold and 276,970 ounces of silver has been produced as at April 30, 2017.produced.
Financial Results
The Company had revenues from operations during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 in the amount of $16.9 million from the sales of 12,653 ounces of gold and 53,514 ounces of silver and $31.7 million from the sales of 23,813 ounces of gold and 115,609 ounces of silver, respectively. The Company generated revenues of $3.5 million from the sales of 2,362 ounces of gold and 26,500 ounces of silver during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. Production commenced on April 1, 2016 and therefore the Company did not generate any revenues during the first fiscal quarter of 2016.
The Company generated more revenues from operations during three months ended June 30, 2017 by selling more ounces of gold and silver. In comparison, the Company generated $14.8 million from the sales of 11,406 ounces of gold and 64,581 ounces of silver. The Company did not have revenuessilver during the three months ended March 31, 2016 as production commenced on April 1, 2016.2017.
The costcosts, excluding depreciation and depletion, applicable to sales incurred during the periodthree and six months ended June 30, 2017 were $13.4 million and $24.9 million (three and six months ended June 2016 - $3.6 million), respectively. The cost of sales, excluding depreciation and depletion, increased due to higher sales of gold and silver compared to the prior quarter (three months ended March 31, 2017 was- $11.6 million, excluding depreciation and depletion. The Company did not have any cost applicable to sales for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as production started on April 1, 2016.million). Costs of sales include mining, processing, maintenance and site support costs. Also, included in the costs of sales are refining, transportation costs, royalties and personal property taxes.
The Company recorded an attributable netDepreciation and comprehensive loss of $2.4 million ($0.02 loss per basic share)depletion expenses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were $2.7 million and $5.5 million (three and six months ended June 30, 2016 - $1.8 million), respectively. Production commenced on April 1, 2016 and therefore the Company did not record significant depreciation and depletion until after this date. The depreciation and depletion expenses for three months ended June 30, 2017 were little changed from the prior quarter (three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to an attributable net and comprehensive loss of $8.9 million ($0.09 loss per basic share) during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Loss from operations during the period ended March 31, 2017 was mainly related to $14.8 million in revenues net of $11.6 million in cost of sales, a- $2.8 million expense in depletion and depreciation, $1.4 million in general and administrative expenses and $1.0 million in interest expense.million).
General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1$0.29 million to $1.4$0.7 million during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, when compared to $1.5$0.99 million for the same period in 2016 primarily as a result of an increase in corporate salaries by $0.2 million, an increase in corporate expenses by $0.1 million related to the addition of administrative personnel in Mojave as the Project started production, and increase on regulatory fees and licences by $0.1 million. This was offset by, a decrease in legalcorporate salaries. General and administrative expenses of $0.5decreased by $0.4 million as there were no significant legal matters asto $2.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, when compared to $2.5 million for the same period in 2016 whenprimarily due to a decrease in legal costs of $0.5 million. The decrease in legal costs was offset by increase in corporate expenditures by $0.1 million between two periods. General and administrative expenses for three months ended June 30, 2017 were incurred as a resultlower than the prior quarter (three months ended March 31, 2017 – $1.4 million) mainly because of settlement of the Complaint on Alleged Short-swing Trading Profits the Company haddecrease in 2016.corporate administration costs and audit, legal and professional fees.
For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company incurred a total interest expense of $1.0$1.3 million and $2.3 million (three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2016 - $1.8 million)million and $2.6 million, respectively), respectively, related to its various loans. The decrease was mainly due to the fact the June 2015 Loan was replaced by a new loan in November 2016 with a lower principal and a reduction of 1%2% on the interest rate. Please refer to Note 9(ii) and 9(iii) of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements. Also, during the periodthree and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 there were no interest capitalized to mineral properties, compared to $1.0 million in the same periodperiods of 2016. The interest expense of $1.0 million for three months ended March 31, 2017 was lower than the interest for the current quarter because of the greater balance of loan due to interest accretion in the prior quarter and interest payable balance transfer to principal balance.
| 26 | P a g e |
During the first quarter of 2017 the amount of theThe Company’s derivative liability as at June 30, 2017 and for the six months then ended includes the warrants issued in conjunction with the November 2016 Clay Loan, the June 2015 Loan and the July 2016 Financing. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a decrease in the derivative liability of $2.4 million and $1.8 million (three and six months ended June 30, 2016 – a decrease of $1.1 million and an increase of $5.9 million, respectively), respectively. The significant increase during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was due to increase in the Company’s share price. Refer to Note 10 of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for a detailed analysis of the changes in fair value of the derivative liability. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company recorded an increase in the derivative liability of $0.5 million due to a slight increase in the Company’s share price, compared to $7.0 million as a result of 165% increase in the Company’s share price during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Refer to Note 10 of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for a detailed analysis of the changes in fair value of the derivative liability.
The Company recorded a net loss and comprehensive loss of $2.8 million (or $0.02 loss per basic share) during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to net and comprehensive loss of $8.9 million (or $0.09 loss per basic share) during the same period of 2016. The difference between the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is mainly due to the significant increase in the derivative liability related to the Company’s warrants in 2016.price.
Summary of Quarterly Results (in thousands of US dollars, except per share)
Results for the eight most recent quarters are set out in the table below:
| Results for the quarter ended on: | ||||||||||||||||
| 31-Mar-17 | 31-Dec-16 | 30-Sep-16 | 30-Jun-16 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 14,804 | $ | 10,278 | $ | 13,451 | $ | 3,464 | ||||||||
| Net and comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (2,816 | ) | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 3,590 | $ | (3,568 | ) | |||||
| Net and comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. | $ | (2,426 | ) | $ | 868 | 2,738 | (2,109 | ) | ||||||||
| Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||||
| Results for the quarter ended on: | ||||||||||||||||
| 31-Mar-16 | 31-Dec-15 | 30-Sep-15 | 30-Jun-15 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | Nil | $ | Nil | $ | Nil | $ | Nil | ||||||||
| Net and comprehensive (loss) | (9,280 | ) | $ | (1,217 | ) | $ | (2,203 | ) | $ | (2,092 | ) | |||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. | $ | (8,926 | ) | (722 | ) | (1,924 | ) | (1,379 | ) | |||||||
| Basic net (loss) per share | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||||
| Diluted net (loss) per share | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||||
| Results for the quarter ended on: | ||||||||||||||||
| 30-Jun-17 | 31-Mar-17 | 31-Dec-16 | 30-Sep-16 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 16,882 | $ | 14,804 | $ | 10,278 | $ | 13,451 | ||||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 1,192 | $ | (2,816 | ) | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 3,590 | ||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. | $ | 962 | $ | (2,426 | ) | $ | 868 | 2,738 | ||||||||
| Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | |||||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.03 | |||||||
| Results for the quarter ended on: | ||||||||||||||||
| 30-Jun-16 | 31-Mar-16 | 31-Dec-15 | 30-Sep-15 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 3,464 | $ | Nil | $ | Nil | $ | Nil | ||||||||
| Net and comprehensive loss | (3,568 | ) | $ | (9,280 | ) | $ | (1,217 | ) | $ | (2,203 | ) | |||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. | $ | (2,109 | ) | (8,926 | ) | (722 | ) | (1,924 | ) | |||||||
| Basic net loss per share | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||
| Diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||
During the firstsecond quarter of 2017 net and comprehensive lossincome was $2.8$1.2 million compared to net and comprehensive incomeloss of $0.4$2.8 million in the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. The main reason2017. This change is primarily due to fluctuationsthe movement in the value of the Company’s derivative liabilities from warrants of 114% from gains of $3.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2016 to a loss of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2017. As the stock price rises, the derivative liabilities increase resulting in the Company recognizing losses. Alternatively, when the stock price decreases, the Company recognizes gains.liability (discussed above).
For fiscal 2016, although the Company generated revenues starting in the second quarter of 2016, for the quarters illustrated in the above table, the main reasons for the significant fluctuations in net (loss) income between quarterly periods are the fluctuations in the Company’s derivative liabilitiesliability and interest expense.
For fiscal 2015, the Company experienced a loss related to its derivative liabilities in the amount of $0.1 million in the first quarter whereas it recorded a gain of $2.6 million during the second quarter. The second quarter gain was however off-set by higher interest expense and a one-time financing fee of $1.5 million paid in connection with the June 2015 Loan. In the third quarter of 2015, the Company experienced a loss of $0.6 million related to the derivative liabilities. Adding to the losses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was the interest expense and amortization of the discount on the June 2015 Loan and the convertible debenture and the interest expense related to the Komatsu loans. In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company experienced a gain of $1.5 million related to the derivative liabilities. This gain was partially off-set by interest expense and amortization of the discount on the June 2015 Loan and the interest expense related to the equipment finance loans.
In general, the results of operations can vary from quarter to quarter depending upon the nature, timing and cost of activities undertaken during the quarter, whether or not the Company incurs gains or losses on foreign exchange or grants stock options, and the movements in its derivative liability.
Please refer to theResults of Operationssection above for the results of operations for the three and six months ended on March 31,June 30, 2017.
Reclamation Financial Assurance and Asset Retirement Obligation
Reclamation Financial Assurance
The Company is required to provide the Bureau of Land Management, the State Office of Mine Reclamation and Kern County, California with a revised reclamation cost estimate annually. The financial assurance is adjusted once the cost estimate is approved. The Company’s provision for reclamation of the property is estimated each year byon an annual basis. An independent consulting engineer.engineer provides this estimate. This cost estimate, once approved by state and county authorities, forms the basis for a surety bond for reclamation financial assurance. The reclamation assurance provided as at March 31,June 30, 2017 wasis $1.5 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.5 million).
| 27 | P a g e |
The Company is also required to provide financial assurance with the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Regional Board”) for closure and reclamation costs related to the lined impoundments, which are defined as the Stage 1 and Stage 2 heap leach pad, the overflow pond, and the solution collection channel. The reclamation financial assurance estimate for as of March 31,June 30, 2017 is $1.9 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.2 million).
In addition to the above, the Company is required to obtain and maintain financial assurance for initiating and completing corrective action and remediation of a reasonably foreseeable release from the Project’sMine’s waste management units as required by the Regional Board. The reclamation financial assurance estimate for as of March 31,June 30, 2017, is $0.3 million (December 31, 2016 - $0.3 million).
The Company entered into $3.0 million in surety bond agreements in order to release its reclamation deposits. The Company pays a yearly premium of $0.1 million. Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. has provided a corporate guaranty on the surety bonds (see Note 12 ofto the of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements).
Asset Retirement Obligation
The total asset retirement obligation as of March 31,June 30, 2017, was $1.5$1.6 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.4 million).
The Company estimated its asset retirement obligationsobligation based on its requirements to reclaim and remediate its property based on its activities to date. As at March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company estimates the primary cash outflow related to these reclamation activities will commence in 2028. Reclamation provisions are measured at the expected value of future cash flows discounted to their present value using a discount rate based on a credit adjusted risk-free interest rate of 8.7% and an inflation rate of 2.5%2.45%.
Property Rent Payments and Production Royalty Expenses
The Company has acquired a number of mineral properties outright. Itoutright and has acquired exclusive rights to explore, develop and mine other portions of the ProjectMine under various mining lease agreements with landowners.
The As a result, the Company is required to make property rent payments related to its mining lease agreements with landholders, in the form of advance minimum royalties or production royalties. The total property rent paymentsand production royalty expenses for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 were $0.3$0.4 million (March 31,and $0.7 million, respectively (the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 - $0.002 million)$Nil million and $0.01 million, respectively).
There are multiple third party landholders and the royalty amount due to each landholder over the life of the ProjectMine varies with each property.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Stock Option Plan
The Company’s current stock option plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Company in 2013 and approved by shareholders of the Company in 2013. The Company also adopted a house keeping amendment to the plan on April 27, 2015 to clarify the procedure for fixing the early termination date of stock options. The Plan provides a fixed number of 7,200,000 common shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to the grant of stock options. The exercise price of stock options granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), but shall not be less than the volume-weighted, average trading price of the Company’s shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) for the five trading days immediately prior to the date of the grant. The expiry date of a stock option shall be the date so fixed by the Board subject to a maximum term of five years. The Plan provides that the expiry date of the vested portion of a stock option will be the earlier of the date so fixed by the Board at the time the stock option is awarded and the early termination date (the “Early Termination Date”). The Early Termination Date will be the date the vested portion of a stock option expires following the option holder ceasing to be a director, employee or consultant, as determined by the Board at the time of grant, or in the absence thereof at any time prior to the time the option holder ceases to be a director, employee or consultant, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Plan. All options granted under the 2013 Plan will be subject to such vesting requirements as may be prescribed by the TSX, if applicable, or as may be imposed by the Board.
On March 20, 2017, the Company granted 400,002There is a total of 1,395,002 options to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Theoutstanding of which 630,000 options are currently exercisable at a price of $0.65 for a period of five years from the date of grant and 133,334 options vest on March 20, 2018, 133,334 options vest on March 20, 2019 and 133,334 on March 20, 2020.
On November 30, 2016, the Company granted the aggregate amount of 485,000 options to Company’s directors, officers and employees. The options are exercisable at a price of $0.66 for a period of five years from the date of grant and 161,667 options vest on November 30, 2017, 161,667 options vest on November 30, 2018 and 161,668 on November 30, 2019.
A total of 1,955,002 (1,023,334 exercisable) (December 31, 2016 – 1,555,000 (1,023,334outstanding of which 1,023,334 are exercisable); common shares were issuable pursuant to such stock options as at March 31,June 30, 2017.
| 28 | P a g e |
Transactions with Related Parties
Except as noted elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, related party transactions are disclosed as follows:
| (i) | Management Agreement |
During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company paid a total of $0.03 million (Threeand $0.06 million (the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2016 - $0.03 million)million and $0.06 million, respectively), respectively, to the three independent directors of the Company. Additionally, the Company paid $0.02 million (2016 - $Nil) for consulting services to Behre Dolbear, a company wherebyof which a director of Golden Queen serves in the capacity of principal.an executive officer.
| (ii) | Note Payable |
On December 31, 2014, the Company entered into a loan (the “December 2014 Loan”) with the Clay Group for $12.5 million, due on July 1, 2015 and bore an annual interest rate of 10%. The December 2014 Loan was guaranteed by GQM Holdings, and secured by a pledge of the Company's interests in GQM Canada, GQM Canada’s interest in GQM Holdings and GQM Holdings' 50% interest in GQM LLC.
The Company also incurred a financing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1.0 million, of which, $0.8 million was paid on December 31, 2014 and the remaining $0.3$0.2 million was paid on January 5, 2015.
On June 8, 2015, the Company amended the December 2014 Loan to extend the maturity to December 8, 2016 and increased the principal amount from $12.5 million to $37.5 million (the “June 2015 Loan”). The Company also issued to the lenders 10,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring June 8, 2020. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.95. All other terms remained the same as the December 2014 Loan. The Company also incurred financing fees to secure the loan in the amount of $1.5 million. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this debt instrument which totaledin the amount of $0.04 million. The total legal fees were expensed as the transaction met the definition of a debt extinguishment.
On November 18, 2016, the Company repaid $12.2 million of the June 2015 Loan and accrued interest with cash on hand and the net proceeds of $10.1 million from an equity financing. The Company restructured the remaining debt with a new loan with a principal amount of $31.0 million (the “November 2016 Clay Loan”). The new loan has a thirty-month term and an annual interest rate of 8%, payable on a quarterly basis commencing during the first quarter of 2017. Quarterly principal payments of $2.5 million commence during the first quarter of 2018, with a payment of the remaining balance at the maturity date. The first four quarterly interest payments under the November 2016 Clay Loan can be added to the loan principal balance rather than paid in cash, at the Company’s option. The Company exercised this option on January 1, 2017 and April 1, 2017 and transferred $0.3 million and $0.6 million of interest to the principal.principal, respectively.
In connection with the November 2016 Clay Loan the Company issued 8,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring November 21, 2021. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.85. The Company also incurred a financing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $0.9 million, all of which was paid on November 18, 2016.
The table below summarizes the activity on the note payable:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 26,347 | $ | 36,053 | ||||
| Interest payable transferred to principal balance | 296 | 2,977 | ||||||
| Accretion of discount on loans | 286 | 1,996 | ||||||
| Capitalized financing fee and legal fees | - | (930 | ) | |||||
| Reduction of debt upon issuance of warrants | - | (3,090 | ) | |||||
| Repayment of loans and interest | - | (10,659 | ) | |||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 26,929 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| Current portion | $ | 2,500 | $ | - | ||||
| Non-current portion | $ | 24,429 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 26,347 | $ | 36,053 | ||||
| Interest payable transferred to principal balance | 922 | 2,977 | ||||||
| Accretion of discount on loans | 740 | 1,996 | ||||||
| Capitalized financing fee and legal fees | - | (930 | ) | |||||
| Reduction of debt upon issuance of warrants | - | (3,090 | ) | |||||
| Repayment of loans and interest | - | (10,659 | ) | |||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 28,009 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| Current portion | $ | 5,922 | $ | - | ||||
| Non-current portion | $ | 22,087 | $ | 26,347 | ||||
| 29 | P a g e |
Share Purchase Warrants – Clay loans
On June 8, 2015, the Company issued 10,000,000 share purchase warrants to the Clay familyGroup in connection with the June 2015 Loan. The share purchase warrants are exercisable until June 8, 2020 at an exercise price of $0.95. Included in the June 2015 Loan agreement was an anti-dilution provision. If the Company were to complete a financing at a share price lower than the exercise price of the share purchase warrants, the exercise price of the share purchase warrants would be adjusted to match the price at which the financing was completed.
On November 18, 2016, the Company issued 8,000,000 share purchase warrants to the Clay familyGroup in connection with the November 2016 Clay Loan. The share purchase warrants are exercisable until November 18, 2021 at an exercise price of $0.85. Included in the November 2016 Clay Loan agreement was an anti-dilution provision. If the Company were to complete a financing at a share price lower than the exercise price of the share purchase warrants, the exercise price of the share purchase warrants would be adjusted to match the price at which the financing was completed.
The share purchase warrants meet the definition of a derivative liability instrument as the exercise price is not a fixed price as described above. Therefore, the settlement feature does not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria outlined in ASC 815-40-15.
The fair value of the derivative liabilities related to the share purchase warrants as at March 31,June 30, 2017 is $5.9$4.0 million (December 31, 2016 - $5.5 million). The derivative liabilities wereare calculated using the binomial and the Black-Scholes pricing valuation models with the following assumptions:
| Warrants related to June 2015 Loan | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.87 | % | 0.84 | % | 1.17 | % | 0.84%. | |||||||||
| Expected life of derivative liability | 3.19 years | 3.44 years | 2.94 years | 3.44 years | ||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | 73.66 | % | 78.79 | % | 76.60 | % | 78.79 | % | ||||||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
| Warrants related to November 2016 Loan | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.12 | % | 1.11 | % | ||||||||||||
| Expected life of derivative liability | 4.65 years | 4.89 years | ||||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | 88.21 | % | 77.21 | % | ||||||||||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||
| Warrants related to November 2016 Loan | June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.38 | % | 1.11 | % | ||||
| Expected life of derivative liability | 4.40 years | 4.89 years | ||||||
| Expected volatility | 79.58 | % | 77.21 | % | ||||
| Dividend rate | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
The change in the derivative share purchase warrants is as follows:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 5,458 | $ | 2,498 | ||||
| Fair value at inception | - | 3,090 | ||||||
| Change in fair value | 427 | (130 | ) | |||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 5,885 | $ | 5,458 | ||||
| June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 5,458 | $ | 2,498 | ||||
| Fair value at inception | - | 3,090 | ||||||
| Change in fair value | (1,452 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||
| Balance, end of the period | $ | 4,006 | $ | 5,458 | ||||
| 30 | P a g e |
| (iii) | Amortization of Discounts and Interest Expense |
The following table summarizes the amortization of discounts and interest on loan:
| Three Months | Three Months | |||||||
| Ended March 31, | Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Accretion of the Nov 2016 Loan discount | $ | 286 | $ | - | ||||
| Interest expense related to the Nov 2016 Loan | 626 | - | ||||||
| Interest expense related to Komatsu financial loans(1) | 135 | 167 | ||||||
| Accretion of the June 2015 Loan discount | - | 606 | ||||||
| Interest expense related to the June 2015 Loan | - | 994 | ||||||
| Accretion of discount and interest on loan | $ | 1,047 | $ | 1,767 | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Accretion of the Nov 2016 Loan discount | $ | 454 | $ | - | $ | 740 | $ | - | ||||||||
| Interest expense related to the Nov 2016 Loan | 646 | - | 1,272 | - | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense related to Komatsu financial loans(1) | 150 | 154 | 285 | 320 | ||||||||||||
| Accretion of the June 2015 Loan discount | - | 626 | - | 1,232 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense related to the June 2015 Loan | - | 1,013 | - | 2,008 | ||||||||||||
| Accretion of discount and interest on loan | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 3,560 | ||||||||
The Company’s loans were contracted to fund significant development costs.costs at the Mine. The Company capitalizes a portion of the interest expense as it related to funds borrowed to complete development activities at the Project site.
| Three Months | Three Months | |||||||
| Ended March 31, | Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Accretion of discounts and interest on loan(1) | $ | 1,047 | $ | 1,767 | ||||
| Less: Interest costs capitalized(2) | - | (1,005 | ) | |||||
| Interest expense | $ | 1,047 | $ | 762 | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Accretion of discounts and interest on loan(1) | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 3,560 | ||||||||
| Less: Interest costs capitalized(2) | - | - | - | (1,006 | ) | |||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | 1,250 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 2,554 | ||||||||
(1) Komatsu is not a related party and has only been included in the above table to reconcile the total interest expense incurred for the period to the amounts capitalized and expensed.
(2) Interest capitalization ended on March 31, 2016 because the mine went into production on April 1, 2016.
| Komatsu is not a related party and has only been included in the above table to reconcile the total interest expense incurred for the period to the amounts capitalized and expensed. |
| (2) | Interest capitalization ended on March 31, 2016 because the mine went into production on April 1, 2016. |
| (iv) | Joint Venture Transaction |
On September 15, 2014, the
The Company closedcompleted the Joint Venture Transaction with Gauss in September 2014 resulting in both parties owning a 50% interest in the Project.Mine. Pursuant to the Joint Venture Transaction, Golden Queen converted its wholly-owned subsidiary GQM Inc., the entity developing the Project,Mine, into a California limited liability company named GQM LLC. OnUpon closing, of the Joint Venture Transaction, Gauss acquired 50% of GQM LLC by investing $110 million cash in exchange for newly issued membership units of GQM LLC. GQM Holdings, a newly incorporated subsidiary of the Company, holds the other 50% of GQM LLC.
Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia and the Clay Group. Gauss is owned 70.51% by Gauss Holdings and 29.49% by Auvergne, the Clay Group’s investment entity. Pursuant to the transaction, Leucadia was paid a transaction fee of $2.0 million and $0.3 million was paid to Auvergne through GQM LLC in 2014. The Company has adopted an accounting policy of expensing these transaction costs.
| 31 | P a g e |
Variable Interest Entity
In accordance with ASC 810-10-30, the Company has determined that GQM LLC meets the definition of a VIEVariable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and that the Company is part of a related party group that, in its entirety, would meet the definition of a primary beneficiary. Although no individual variable interest holder individually meets the definition of a primary beneficiary in the absence of the related party group, Golden Queen has determined it is considered the member of the related party group most closely associated with GQM LLC. As a result, the Company has condensed consolidated interim 100% of the accounts of GQM LLC in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements, while presenting a non-controlling interest portion representing the 50% interest of Gauss in GQM LLC on its balance sheet. A portion of the non-controlling interest has beenis presented as temporary equity on the Company’s balance sheet representing the initial value of the non-controlling interest that could potentially be redeemable by Gauss in the future.
The Company has presented Gauss’ ownership in GQM LLC as a non-controlling interest amount on the balance sheet within the equity section. However, there are terms in the agreement that provides for the exit from the investment in GQM LLC for an initial member whose interest in GQM LLC becomes less than 20%.
If a member becomes less than a 20% interest holder, its remaining unit interest will (ultimately) be terminated through one of three events at the non-diluted member’s option:
The net assets of GQM LLC as of March 31,June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 are as follows:
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Assets, GQM LLC | $ | 152,976 | $ | 151,802 | ||||
| Liabilities, GQM LLC | (22,663 | ) | (20,710 | ) | ||||
| Net assets, GQM LLC | $ | 130,313 | $ | 131,092 | ||||
| June 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Assets, GQM LLC | $ | 152,934 | $ | 151,802 | ||||
| Liabilities, GQM LLC | (22,157 | ) | (20,710 | ) | ||||
| Net assets, GQM LLC | $ | 130,777 | $ | 131,092 | ||||
Included in the assets above is $9.4$5.0 million (December 31, 2016 - $11.1 million) in cash held as at March 31,June 30, 2017. The cash in GQM LLC is directed specifically to fund capital expenditures required to continue with production and settle GQM LLC’s obligations. The liabilities of GQM LLC do not have recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary except for two (2) mining drill loans and $3.0 million in surety bond agreements.
Non-Controlling Interest
The carrying value of the non-controlling interest is adjusted for net income and loss, distributions and contributions pursuant to ASC 810-10 based on the same percentage allocation used to calculate the initial book value of temporary equity.
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Net and comprehensive income (loss) in GQM LLC | $ | (317 | ) | $ | (3,628 | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interest percentage | 50 | % | 50 | % | ||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest | $ | (159 | ) | $ | (1,814 | ) | ||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to permanent non-controlling interest | $ | (95 | ) | $ | (1,088 | ) | ||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to temporary non-controlling interest | $ | (64 | ) | $ | (726 | ) | ||
| Permanent Non-Controlling Interest | Temporary Non-Controlling Interest | |||||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, December 31, 2016 | $ | 39,327 | $ | 26,220 | ||||
| Net and comprehensive loss for the period | (95 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, June 30, 2017 | $ | 39,232 | $ | 26,156 | ||||
| 32 | P a g e |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2017 | 2016 | |||||||
| Net and comprehensive loss in GQM LLC | $ | (779 | ) | $ | (709 | ) | ||
| Non-controlling interest percentage | 50 | % | 50 | % | ||||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest | $ | (390 | ) | $ | (355 | ) | ||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to permanent non-controlling interest | $ | (234 | ) | $ | (213 | ) | ||
| Net and comprehensive loss attributable to temporary non-controlling interest | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | ||
Revolving credit
| Permanent Non- Controlling Interest | Temporary Non- Controlling Interest | |||||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, December 31, 2016 | $ | 39,327 | $ | 26,220 | ||||
| Net and comprehensive loss for the period | (234 | ) | (156 | ) | ||||
| Carrying value of non-controlling interest, March 31, 2017 | $ | 39,093 | $ | 26,064 | ||||
Management Agreement
On May 23, 2017, GQM LLC entered into a revolving credit facility of $5 million with Gauss Holdings and Auvergne LLC. The revolving credit is managed byavailable until May 23, 2018 and bears a board of managers comprising an equal number of representatives of each of Gauss and GQM Holdings. The officers of12% simple annual interest. GQM LLC are Robert C. Walish Jr.paid a closing fee of $0.1 million which was classified as Chief Executive Officerprepaid expenses and Guy Le Bel Chief Financial Officer of GQM LLC. Bryan A. Coates was appointed to the GQM LLC Board of Managers as a nomineeother current assets. $0.02 million of the Company.closing fee was amortized during three and six months ended June 30, 2017. As long as a member of at June 30, 2017 and August 9, 2017 (“the Clay family holds greater that 25% of the Company, the Clay Group is entitled to appoint one (1) of the Company’s representatives to the GQM LLC board of managers.reporting date”), no amounts had been drawn under this facility.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
All financial assets and financial liabilities are recorded at fair value on initial recognition. Transaction costs are expensed when they are incurred, unless they are directly attributable to the acquisition of qualifying assets, in which case they are added to the costs of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale.
Fair Value Measurements
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
| Level 1 | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
| Level 2 | Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; |
| Level 3 | Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity). |
| March 31, 2017 | June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – Related Party (Note 10) | $ | 5,885 | $ | - | $ | 5,885 | $ | - | $ | 4,006 | $ | - | $ | 4,006 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – (Note 10) | 1,026 | - | 1,026 | - | 530 | - | 530 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 6,911 | $ | - | $ | 6,911 | $ | - | $ | 4,536 | $ | - | $ | 4,536 | $ | - | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – Related Party (Note 10) | $ | 5,458 | $ | - | $ | 5,458 | $ | - | ||||||||
| Share purchase warrants – (Note 10) | 972 | - | 972 | - | ||||||||||||
| $ | 6,430 | $ | - | $ | 6,430 | $ | - | |||||||||
Under fair value accounting, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value measurement of the financial instruments above uses observable inputs in option price models such as the binomial and the Black-Scholes valuation models.
Please refer also to the note on fair value of derivative liability underResults of Operationsoperations above for more information.
Select Non-Consolidated Figures
The Company has 50% interest in GQM LLC, which meets the definition of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”).VIE. The Company consolidates entities which meet the definition of a VIE for which it is the primary beneficiary. The Company has determined it is the member of the related party group that is most closely associated with GQM LLC and, as a result, is the primary beneficiary who consolidates GQM LLC.
| 33 | P a g e |
The following table shows figures attributable to the Company only as of March 31, 2017:June 30, 2017 and for six months then ended:
| GQM LLC 100% | GQM LLC 50% Attributable to LTD | LTD on a Non- Consolidated Basis * | LTD Attributable | |||||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (1) + (2) | ||||||||||||||
| Cash | $ | 7,688 | $ | 3,844 | $ | 1,763 | $ | 5,607 | ||||||||
| Short Term Debt | $ | 6,137 | $ | 3,069 | $ | 2,500 | $ | 5,569 | ||||||||
| Long Term Debt | $ | 10,089 | $ | 5,045 | $ | 24,429 | $ | 29,474 | ||||||||
| Working Capital / (Deficit) | $ | 9,074 | $ | 4,537 | $ | (8,321 | ) | $ | (3,784 | ) | ||||||
| GQM LLC 100% | GQM LLC 50% Attributable to LTD | LTD on a Non-Consolidated Basis * | LTD Attributable | |||||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (1) + (2) | ||||||||||||||
| Cash | $ | 4,992 | $ | 2,496 | $ | 1,292 | $ | 3,789 | ||||||||
| Short Term Debt | $ | 6,194 | $ | 3,097 | $ | 5,922 | $ | 9,019 | ||||||||
| Long Term Debt | $ | 8,519 | $ | 4,260 | $ | 22,087 | $ | 26,347 | ||||||||
| Working Capital / (Deficit) | $ | 5,873 | $ | 2,937 | $ | (9,771 | ) | $ | (6,835 | ) | ||||||
* Includes GQM Holdings
| GQM LLC 100% | GQM LLC 50% Attributable to LTD | LTD on a Non- Consolidated Basis * | LTD Attributable | GQM LLC 100% | GQM LLC 50% Attributable to LTD | LTD on a Non-Consolidated Basis * | LTD Attributable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (1) + (2) | (1) | (2) | (1) + (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 14,804 | $ | 7,402 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,402 | $ | 31,686 | $ | 15,843 | $ | 0 | $ | 15,843 | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost of sales including depreciation and depletion | $ | (14,210 | ) | $ | (7,105 | ) | $ | (109 | ) | $ | (7,214 | ) | $ | (30,207 | ) | $ | (15,103 | ) | $ | (221 | ) | $ | (15,324 | ) | ||||||||
| Accretion expense | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
| G&A Expenses | $ | (875 | ) | $ | (438 | ) | $ | (511 | ) | $ | (949 | ) | $ | (1,151 | ) | $ | (575 | ) | $ | (899 | ) | $ | (1,474 | ) | ||||||||
| Share based payments | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (84 | ) | $ | (84 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange gain (loss) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Increase) / Decrease in fair value of derivative liability | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (481 | ) | $ | (481 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,894 | $ | 1,894 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | $ | (136 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | $ | (912 | ) | $ | (979 | ) | $ | (286 | ) | $ | (143 | ) | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (2,154 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest Income | $ | 21 | $ | 11 | $ | 4 | $ | 14 | $ | 56 | $ | 28 | $ | 7 | $ | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
| Others | $ | (352 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (176 | ) | $ | (353 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (176 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net Loss | $ | (779 | ) | $ | (390 | ) | $ | (2,036 | ) | $ | (2,426 | ) | $ | (317 | ) | $ | (158 | ) | $ | (1,306 | ) | $ | (1,464 | ) | ||||||||
* Includes GQM Holdings
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has generated $42.0$58.9 million in revenues from operations since inception and as at March 31,June 30, 2017 had an accumulated deficit of $89.8$88.8 million and a working capital surplusdeficit of $0.8$3.9 million.
Cash generated from operations for the three monthsand six month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2017 was $2.8 million.million and $5.5 million respectively.
On November 18, 2016, the Company repaid $12.2 million of the June 2015 Loan and accrued interest with cash on hand and the net proceeds of $10.1 million from an equity financing. The Company restructured the remaining debt with the November 2016 Clay Loan with a principal amount of $31.0 million. The November 2016 Clay Loan has a 30-month term and an annual interest rate of 8%, payable on a quarterly basis commencing first quarter of 2017, a repayment of $2.5 million on a quarterly basis commencing first quarter of 2018 and repayment of balance at maturity date. The first four quarterly interest payments on the November 2016 Clay Loan can be added to the loan principal balance rather than paid in cash, at the Company’s option. The Company exercised this option on January 1, 2017 and April 1, 2017, and transferred $0.3 million and $0.6 million interest to the principal.principal, respectively.
Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. expects to have sufficient cash on hand to meet its corporate general and administrative expenditures for the next twelve months from the date of the approval of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements. However, theThe Company is required to pay $5.4$3.2 and $8.4 million inof accrued interest and debt principal, repaymentin total, on the three following dates: January 1, 2018, April 1, 2018 and July 1, 2018. The Company will need to receive cash distributions from GQM LLC to service its debt and such distributions are contingent on GQM LLC’s ability to generate positive cash flows. The Company revised the mine plan in light of the six months ended June 30, 2017 results and has determined it is unlikely it will receive sufficient distributions from GQM LLC during this fiscal year to service its debt in early 2018. This situation raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Consequently, discussion with the Clay Group to restructure the reimbursement schedule has been initiated. While the Company anticipates receiving sufficient distributions from GQM LLC during this fiscal year to service itshas been successful in re-negotiating the debt in 2018, however such distributions are dependentreimbursement schedule with the Clay Group on a number of factors, including the gold price and the ability of the mine to perform according to the mine plan for 2017. Because of the uncertainty relating to the above factors,previous occasions, there can be no assurance that sufficient distributions will be generated and paid by GQM LLC to the Company in order for it to meet its obligations when they fall due. If the distributions are not sufficient, the Company will need to either raise equity or negotiate with its debt lender a delay in principal and interest repayments.achieved going forward.
| 34 | P a g e |
The Company’s access to the net assets of GQM LLC is determined by the Board of Managers of GQM LLC. The Board of Managers is not controlled by the Company and therefore there is no guarantee that any access to the net assets of GQM LLC would be provided to the Company in order to continue as a going concern. The Board of Managers of GQM LLC determine when and if distributions from GQM LLC are made to the holders of its membership units at their sole discretion.
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not reflect adjustments to the carrying values of the assets and liabilities, the reported revenues and expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used, that would be necessary if the company were unable to realize its assets and settle its liabilities as a going concern in the normal course of operations. Such adjustments could be material.
Cash generated from (used in) Operating Activitiesoperating activities:
Cash generated by operating activities including general and administrative expenses such as legal fees, accounting, taxation and auditing fees, corporate expenses, office expenses and corporate salary was $2.8$5.5 million (used in the three-month periodsix months ended March 31,June 30, 2016 - $3.2$7.1 million) for the three months’ periodsix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017. The increase in cash utilized in operating activities is primarily due to the increase in revenues since the Company started production in the second quarter of 2016, improvements in working capital and operating cost.
Cash used in Investing Activities:investing activities:
Cash used in investing activities totaled $5.2$9.5 million during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 (three(the six months ended March 31,June 30, 2016 - $6.6$9.4 million). Construction of the second stage of the leach pad started duringcommenced in the first quarter of 2017. The significant development costs related to the heap leach pad incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2017 were $8.6 million and included the solution collection piping and drain cover placement, drain cover crushing, subgrade and liner. The significant development costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016 included the completion of the crushing-screening plant facilities, the conveying and stacking system, the Merrill-Crowe plant and the water and power supply.
Cash from Financing Activities:financing activities:
Cash used in financing activities totaled $1.4$3.0 million during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 (three(the six months ended March 31,June 30, 2016 – cash used of $1.2$2.5 million). See below a description of theThe main financing activities used byof the Company during the threesix months ended March 31, 2017:June 30, 2017 included:
| · | The Company made principal payments of |
Working Capital:capital:
| LTD on a Non- Consolidated Basis * | LTD on a Consolidated Basis ** | |||||||
| Current Assets | $ | 1,881 | $ | 21,964 | ||||
| Current Liabilities | $ | (10,202 | ) | $ | (21,212 | ) | ||
| Working Capital / (Deficit) | $ | (8,321 | ) | $ | 752 | |||
| LTD on a Non-Consolidated Basis * | LTD on a Consolidated Basis ** | |||||||
| Current Assets | $ | 1,371 | $ | 19,264 | ||||
| Current Liabilities | $ | (11,143 | ) | $ | (23,163 | ) | ||
| Working Capital / (Deficit) | $ | (9,771 | ) | $ | (3,899 | ) | ||
* Includes GQM Holdings ** Includes GQM Holdings and GQM LLC | ||||||||
* Includes GQM Holdings
| 35 | P a g e |
** Includes GQM Holdings and GQM LLC
Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. and Golden QueenGQM Holdings Inc.
As at March 31,June 30, 2017, Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. and Golden QueenGQM Holdings Inc. had current assets of $1.9$1.4 million (December 31, 2016 - $2.3 million) and current liabilities of $10.2$11.1 million (December 31, 2016 - $6.9 million) or a working capital deficit of $8.3$9.8 million (December 31, 2016 – working capital deficit of $4.6 million). The decrease in current assets from December 31, 20152016 is the result of general corporate expenditures such as corporate salary expenses, legal fees, audit fees, financing fees and interest expenses. The increase in current liabilities is the result of the principal paymentpayments of the November 2016 Clay Loan now being included in our current liabilities.
Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd will use its cash for general corporate expenditures such as accounting fees, legal fees and corporate salary expenses. Interest expenses on the November 2016 Clay Loan due during 2017 canmay be added to the loan principal balance rather than paid in cash, at the Company’s option.
GQM LLC
As at March 31,June 30, 2017, GQM LLC had current assets of $20.2$17.9 million (December 31, 2016 - $22.7 million) and current liabilities of $11.0$12.0 million (December 31, 2016 - $9.9 million) or a working capital surplus of $9.2$5.9 million (December 31, 2016 – $12.8 million).
The decrease in current assets from December 31, 2016 is resulting from the result of cash spent on project-related expenditures and working capital. The increase in current liabilities is the result ofdue to an increase ofin accounts payable and an increase of the short-term portion of the mobile equipment loans.
GQM LLC will use its cash on hand for sustaining capital expenditures and for working capital needs.
Outstanding ShareShares Data
The number of shares issued and outstanding and the fully diluted share position are set out in the table below:
| Item | No. of Shares | No. of Shares | ||||||||||
| Shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2016 | 111,048,683 | 111,048,683 | ||||||||||
| Shares issued as the result of a purchase agreement | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||||||
| Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options | Nil | Nil | ||||||||||
| Shares issued and outstanding on March 31, 2017 | 111,148,683 | Exercise Price | Expiry Date | |||||||||
| Shares issued and outstanding on June 30, 2017 | 111,148,683 | Exercise Price | Expiry Date | |||||||||
| Shares to be issued on exercise of directors and employees stock options | 1,808,335 | $0.58 to $1.59 | From 06/03/18 to 03/16/22 | 1,395,002 | $0.58 to $1.59 | From 06/03/18 to 03/16/22 | ||||||
| Shares to be issued on exercise of warrants | 24,317,700 | $0.95 | 06/08/20 | 24,317,700 | $0.95 | 06/08/20 | ||||||
| Fully diluted March 31, 2017 | 137,274,718 | |||||||||||
| Fully diluted June 30, 2017 | 136,861,385 | |||||||||||
| The company has an unlimited authorized share capital | ||||||||||||
Subsequent Events
On AprilJuly 1, 2017, the Company was scheduled to make a quarterly interest payment on the November 2016 Clay Loan. In accordance with the terms of the November 2016 Clay Loan agreement, the Company chose to exercise its right to add the interest owed on AprilJuly 1, 2017 to the principal balance. Thebalance; thereby increasing the principal balance of the loan was increased by $0.6 million.
| 36 | P a g e |
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Total Cash Costs
Total cash costs are common financial performance measures in the gold mining industry but with no standard meaning under US GAAP. Management believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP, certain investors use this information to evaluate our performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a Company’s ability to generate earnings and cash flow from its mining operations.
Total cash cost figures are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the standard is the accepted standard of reporting cash cost of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Total cash costs are derived from amounts included in the statement of operations and include direct mining costs and site general and administrative costs. The direct mining costs shown on the table below include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, smelting, refining, third party transportation costs, advanced minimum royalties and production costs less silver metals revenues. Management has determined that silver metals revenues when compared with gold metals revenues, are immaterial and therefore are considered a by-product of the production of gold.
The table below shows a reconciliation of total cash costs per gold ounce and cash costs per gold ounce on a by-product basis (expressed in thousands of US dollars except ounce and per ounce amounts).:
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
| Total Cash Costs | ||||||||
| Mining | $ | 5,624 | $ | 4,933 | ||||
| Processing | 4,379 | 4,243 | ||||||
| Indirect mining cost | 1,880 | 1,901 | ||||||
| Inventory changes and others | (322 | ) | (2,181 | ) | ||||
| Costo of sales | 11,561 | 8,896 | ||||||
| Site general and administrative | 838 | 754 | ||||||
| Cash costs before by product credits | 12,399 | 9,650 | ||||||
| Divided by gold sold (oz) | 11,160 | 7,760 | ||||||
| Cash costs per ounce of gold sold ($/oz) | 1,111 | 1,244 | ||||||
| Less: By-product silver credits per ounce ($/oz) | (98 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
| Total cash cost per ounce of gold sold on a by-product basis ($/oz) | $ | 1,013 | $ | 1,095 | ||||
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||
| Total cash costs | ||||||||||||
| Mining | $ | 6,583 | $ | 5,624 | $ | 4,933 | ||||||
| Processing | 4,797 | 4,379 | 4,243 | |||||||||
| Indirect mining cost | 1,795 | 1,880 | 1,901 | |||||||||
| Inventory changes and others | 192 | (322 | ) | (2,181 | ) | |||||||
| Cost of sales | 13,367 | 11,561 | 8,896 | |||||||||
| Site general and administrative | 658 | 838 | 776 | |||||||||
| Cash costs before by-product credits | 14,025 | 12,399 | 9,672 | |||||||||
| Divided by gold produced (oz) | 12,632 | 11,406 | 7,779 | |||||||||
| Cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($/oz) | 1,110 | 1,087 | 1,243 | |||||||||
| Less: By-product silver credits per ounce ($/oz) | (72 | ) | (98 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||||
| Total cash cost per ounce of gold produced on a by-product basis ($/oz) | $ | 1,038 | $ | 989 | $ | 1,096 | ||||||
| Ore placed (tons) | 1,026,332 | 791,232 | 894,754 | |||||||||
| Total Cash Costs ($/t placed) | 13.48 | 16.08 | 13.25 | |||||||||
| Crusher mechanical availability (%) | 81 | % | 63 | % | 70 | % | ||||||
| Apparent cumulative recovery(1) - gold (%) | 68.0 | % | 64.2 | % | 59.7 | % | ||||||
| Apparent cumulative recovery(1) - silver (%) | 25.3 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||||
The transition to the production phase commenced on April 1, 2016. As such, comparative figures for certain measures or data are not available or are not meaningful.
| (1) | Note: Apparent cumulative recovery is the ratio of metal produced since beginning of leaching over total metal contained in ore loaded to pad since beginning of operation. |
All-in Sustaining Costs
In September 2013, the World Gold Council, a non-regulatory association of the world’s leading gold mining companies established to promote the use of gold to industry, consumers and investors, provided guidance for the calculation of the measure “All-in sustaining costs”, which has no standard meaning under US GAAP. These standards became effective January 1, 2014. Management believes that the all-in sustaining costs measure provides additional insight into the costs of producing gold by capturing all of the expenditures required for the discovery, development and sustaining of gold production and allows the Company to assess its ability to support capital expenditures to sustain future production from the generation of operating cash flows. Management believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP, certain investors use this information to evaluate our performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
Golden Queen defines all-in sustaining costs as the sum of direct mining costs (as defined under total cash costs), site and corporate general and administrative costs, share based payments, reclamation liability accretion and capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Other companies may calculate these measures differently.
| 37 | P a g e |
The table below shows a reconciliation of cash costs per gold ounce on a by-product basis and all-in sustaining costs per ounce to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements (expressed in thousands of US dollars except ounce and per ounce amounts).:
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mining | $ | 5,624 | $ | 4,933 | ||||||||||||||||
| Processing | 4,379 | 4,243 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Indirect mining cost | 1,880 | 1,901 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Site G&A | 838 | 754 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory changes | (322 | ) | (2,181 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash costs before by-product credits | $ | 14,025 | $ | 12,399 | $ | 9,672 | ||||||||||||||
| Silver by-product | (1,092 | ) | (1,150 | ) | (915 | ) | (1,092 | ) | (1,150 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total cash cost after by-product | 11,307 | 8,500 | 13,110 | 11,307 | 8,522 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate general and administrative expenses | 578 | 311 | 54 | 578 | 311 | |||||||||||||||
| Share based payments | 34 | 17 | 51 | 34 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
| Accretion expense | 31 | 23 | 32 | 31 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
| Sustaining capital | 7,288 | 2,648 | 4,781 | 7,288 | 2,648 | |||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs | 19,237 | 11,499 | 18,028 | 19,237 | 11,521 | |||||||||||||||
| Divided by gold sold (oz) | 11,160 | 7,760 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Divided by gold produced (oz) | 12,632 | 11,406 | 7,779 | |||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining costs per gold ounce on a by-product basis | $ | 1,724 | $ | 1,482 | $ | 1,427 | $ | 1,724 | $ | 1,481 | ||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
Full disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United StatedUS GAAP can be found in notes of its audited consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2016.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
| (i) | In July 2015, ASU No. 2015-11 was issued related to the inventory, simplifying the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company records inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value and the adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2017 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
| (ii) | In March 2016, ASU No. 2016-09 was issued related to stock-based compensation. The new guidance simplifies the accounting for stock-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for the Company’s fiscal year and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this guidance as of January 1, 2017 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
New Accounting Policies
| (iii) | In May 2014, ASU 2014-09 was issued related to revenue from contracts with customers. The ASU was further amended in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, and May 2016 by ASU 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10 and 2016- 12. The new standard provides a five-step approach to be applied to all contracts with customers and also requires expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. |
In August 2015, the effective date was deferred to reporting periods, including interim periods, beginning after December 31, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is not permitted.
We are currently assessing the impact of implementation of ASU No. 201-09, however, management does not believe it will change the point of revenue recognition or amounts of revenue recognized compared to how we recognize revenue under our current policies. Our revenues involve a relatively limited number of types of contracts and customers. In addition, our revenue contracts do not involve multiple types of performance obligations. Revenues from doré are recognized, and the transaction price is known, at the time the metals sold are delivered to the customer. We will finalize our assessment of the impact of ASU No. 201-09 on our revenue recognition during 2017 and assess the additional disclosure requirements under the guidance.
The ASU will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and are applicable on a modified retrospective basis with various optional practical expedients. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.
Other Legal Matters The Center for Biodiversity Petition to List the Mohave Shoulderband Snail as an Endangered Species
As a result of a petition filed by the Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD”)
Additional Information
Further information on Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. is available on the SEDAR web site atwww.sedar.com and on the Company’s web site atwww.goldenqueen.com.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the Company by failing to discharge its obligations. To mitigate exposure to credit risk on financial assets the Company has established policies to ensure liquidity of funds and ensure counterparties demonstrate minimum acceptable credit worthiness.
The Company maintains its US Dollar and Canadian Dollar cash in bank accounts with major financial institutions with high credit standings. Cash deposits held in the United States are insured by the
Certain United States and Canadian bank accounts held by the Company exceed these federally insured limits or are uninsured as they relate to US Dollar deposits held in Canadian financial institutions. As of
Interest Rate Risk
The interest rates received on these balances may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash balances during the three and six months
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Certain purchases of labour are denominated in Canadian dollars. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our operations. Specifically, the appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the US dollar may result in an increase in the Canadian operating expenses in US dollar terms. As of Commodity Price Risk
The Company’s primary business activity is the development of the open pit, gold and silver, heap leach project on the Property. Decreases in the price of either of these metals from current levels have the potential to negatively impact the future viability of the
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure controls and procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Changes in
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) during the Fraud
The Company is committed to preventing fraud and corruption and is developing an anti-fraud culture. To achieve this goal, the Company has committed to the following:
The following policies have been developed to support the Company’s goals:
All policies can be viewed in full on the Company’s website atwww.goldenqueen.com
For the three and six months ended
Part II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See “The Center for Biodiversity Petition to List the Mojave Shoulderband Snail as an Endangered Species” and “Other Legal Matters” contained in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
GQM LLC is the operator of the
Item 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||