Kyto Biopharma, Inc. was formed as a Florida corporation on March 5, 1999. B Twelve, Limited, Kyto Biopharma, Inc.'s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary (collectively referred to as the "Company"), was also formed on March 5, 1999. On August 14, 2002, the parent Company changed its name from B Twelve, Inc. to Kyto Biopharma, Inc.

 

The Company is a biopharmaceutical company, formed to acquire and develop innovative minimally toxic and non-immunosuppressive proprietary drugs for the treatment of cancer, arthritis, and other proliferate and autoimmune diseases. The Company is currently not in the development stage and was in “development stage” till June 30, 2011.

Activities during the development stage include acquisition of financing and intellectual properties and research and development activities conducted by others under contracts.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Kyto Biopharma, Inc. (the "Company") have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. Nevertheless, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's March 31, 2013 Annual Report as filed on Form 10K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company with respect to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the results of its operations for the interim period ended September 30,December 31, 2013, have been included. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $319,723,$346,228, a deficit accumulated of $18,138,481,$18,164,986, a stockholders' deficit of $ 319,723$346,228 as of September 30,December 31, 2013. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company's ability to further implement its business plan, raise capital, and generate revenues. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

The Company has yet to generate an internal cash flow, and until the sales of its product begins, the Company is highly dependent upon debt and equity funding The Company must successfully complete its research and development resulting in a saleable product. However, there is no assurance that once the development of the product is completed and finally gains Federal Drug and Administration clearance, that the Company will achieve a profitable level of operations.

During the year ended March 31, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with a vendor, who is also a principal stockholder, for services totalling $200,000. On November 11, 2002, the Company and vendor mutually agreed that in lieu of the $200,000 payment, the vendor would accept 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $1.00 totalling $100,000. In addition, the Company also executed a $100,000 unsecured promissory note with the vendor. Under the terms of the promissory note, the obligation bears interest at prime plus 1% (4.25% at September 30,December 31 2013). Interest is accrued and payable quarterly. At September 30,December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013, accrued interest totalled $84,493$86,433 and $80,634, respectively.

On May 24, 2007 the Company entered into an agreement with Credifinance Capital Corp, a related party, to issue up to 500,000 Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per share. This agreement is on an installment basis. During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 473,624 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock to Credifinance Capital Corp. for a total of $473,624 to satisfy a related party loan payable. Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted into Common Shares at a price of $0.45 per Common Share. The Convertible Preferred Stock bears dividends at a rate of 5% per annum. Preferred Convertible Stock has the same voting rights as Common Stock. As of September 30,December 31, 2013, 473,624 convertible preferred shares were outstanding.

PLAN OF OPERATION

 

 

The report of our Independent Registered Public Accounting firm dated June 28, 2013 on our March 31, 2013 consolidated financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to substantial recurring losses from operations, cash used in operations, stockholders’ deficit, significant accumulated deficit and working capital deficit. Our ability to continue as a going concern will be determined by our ability to obtain additional financing and maintain operations. Currently we do not have sufficient financial resources to fund our operations. Therefore, we need additional funds to continue these operations. The Company operates in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of factors, some of which are beyond management’s control, such as financial market trends and investors’ appetite for new financings. It should be emphasized that, should the Company not be successful in completing its own financing (either by debt or by the issuance of securities from treasury), the Company may be unable to continue to operate as a going concern.

 

 

For the sixnine months ended September 30, 2013 the Company’s net loss attributable to common shareholders increased by $17,630 to $61,111 compared to a net loss of $43,481 for the six months ended September 30, 2012. The comprehensive loss for the six months ended September 30, 2012, increased by $17,630 to $61,111 compared to a comprehensive loss of $43,481 for the six months ended September 30, 2012.

The Company’s net cash used in operations decreased by $319$4,019 to $5,259$7,271 for the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013 compared to net cash used in operations of $5,578$11,290 for the sixnine months ended September30,December 31, 2012.

The Company’s net cash flows from financing activities increased by $700 to $5,200$7,200 for the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013 compared to cash flows from financing activities of $4,500$6,500 for the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2012.

The Company’s plan of operation for the next twelve months is to continue to focus its efforts on finding new sources of capital and on R&D activities related to the development and application of its antibody technologies. As of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company did receive a commitment of one of its stockholders to continue to provide operating loan funds to the Company.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or 1934 Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer/chief financial officer (principal financial officer) as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. During the quarter ended December 31, 2012 we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) under the 1934 Act. Based on this evaluation, because of the Company’s limited resources and limited number of employees, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of September 30,December 31, 2013.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

During the quarter ended September 30,December 31, 2013, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.