UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to _____________.

Commission File Number: 001-35067

SWISHER HYGIENE INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		27-3819646
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4725 Piedmont Row Drive, Suite 400 Charlotte, North Carolina		28210
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(704) 364-7707

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:

Larger Accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	þ
Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of Common Stock at ~~May~~August 6, 2015: ~~17,617,379~~17,628,914 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

SWISHER HYGIENE INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~MARCH 31,~~JUNE 30, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	1

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2014	1

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014	2

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014	3

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	12
		11
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	20
		22
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	2022

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	22
		25
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	24

~~ITEM 5.~~	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~	24
		26
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	2527

~~PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~

~~ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

SWISHER HYGIENE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

	March 31,						June 30,
	2015			December 31,			2015			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2014			(Unaudited)			2014
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,796		$	7,233		$	1,672		$	7,233
Restricted cash		231			231			231			231
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $0.9 million at March 31, 2015 and $1.0 million at December 31, 2014)		17,403			18,751
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $0.9 million at June 30, 2015 and $1.0 million at December 31, 2014)								16,024			18,751
Inventory, net		13,116			15,426			13,592			15,426
Deferred income taxes		520			534			497			534
Assets held for sale		3,076			-
Other assets		3,714			2,525			3,367			2,525
Total current assets		41,856			44,700			35,383			44,700
Property and equipment, net		33,891			37,037			32,162			37,037
Other intangibles, net		5,978			6,654			5,471			6,654
Customer relationships and contracts, net		20,949			22,792			19,585			22,792
Other noncurrent assets		1,910			2,015			1,725			2,015
Total assets	$	104,584		$	113,198		$	94,326		$	113,198

Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	8,795		$	13,627		$	10,763		$	13,627
Accrued payroll and benefits		4,179			3,467			2,806			3,467
Accrued expense		7,498			7,122			7,741			7,122
Long-term debt and obligations due within one year		2,623			1,884			1,935			1,884
Line of credit		3,245			-			611			-
Total current liabilities		26,340			26,100			23,856			26,100
Long-term debt and obligations		1,071			1,185			931			1,185
Deferred income taxes		563			558			558			558
Other long-term liabilities		4,068			4,065			4,028			4,065
Total noncurrent liabilities		5,702			5,808			5,517			5,808
Commitments and contingencies

Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.001, authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
Common stock, par value $0.001, authorized 600,000,000 shares; 17,617,379 shares and 17,612,278 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (1)		18			18
Preferred stock, par value $0.001, authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014								-			-
Common stock, par value $0.001, authorized 600,000,000 shares; 17,622,216 shares and 17,612,278 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (1)								18			18
Additional paid-in capital (1)		390,051			389,942			390,145			389,942
Accumulated deficit		(316,194	)		(307,363	)		(323,884	)		(307,363	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,333	)		(1,307	)		(1,326	)		(1,307	)
Total equity		72,542			81,290			64,953			81,290
Total liabilities and equity	$	104,584		$	113,198		$	94,326		$	113,198

(1)	All outstanding share amounts and computations using such amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the June 3, 2014 one-for-ten reverse stock split.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SWISHER HYGIENE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended March 31,							Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014				2015			2014			2015			2014
Revenue
Products	$	39,263		$	43,241			$	40,160		$	44,780		$	79,423		$	88,021
Services		4,328			4,694				4,398			4,809			8,727			9,503
Franchise and other		250			360				276			366			526			726
Total revenue		43,841			48,295				44,834			49,955			88,676			98,250

Costs and expenses
Cost of sales (exclusive of route expenses and related depreciation and amortization)		19,962			21,812				20,706			22,973			40,668			44,785
Route expenses		11,692			12,364				11,630			12,598			23,321			24,961
Selling, general, and administrative expenses		16,514			19,770				15,858			17,134			32,370			36,904
Depreciation and amortization		4,590			5,359				4,530			5,175			9,120			10,533
Impairment loss on assets held for sale		-			2,028				-			960			-			2,989
Impairment loss on goodwill and intangible assets									166			5,821			166			5,821
Total costs and expenses		52,758			61,333				52,890			64,661			105,645			125,993
Loss from operations		(8,917	)		(13,038	)			(8,056	)		(14,706	)		(16,969	)		(27,743	)

Other income (expense), net		114			(717	)			357			(501	)		471			(1,219	)
Net loss before income taxes		(8,803	)		(13,755	)			(7,699	)		(15,207	)		(16,498	)		(28,962	)
Income tax expense		(28	)		(37	)
Income tax (expense) benefit									5			60			(23	)		23
Net loss		(8,831	)		(13,792	)			(7,694	)		(15,147	)		(16,521	)		(28,939	)

Comprehensive loss
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(26	)		(15	)			8			16			(19	)		1
Comprehensive loss	$	(8,857	)	$	(13,807	)		$	(7,686	)	$	(15,131	)	$	(16,540	)	$	(28,938	)

Loss per share (1)
Basic and diluted	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.78	)		$	(0.43	)	$	(0.86	)	$	(0.93	)	$	(1.64	)

Weighted-average common shares used in the computation of loss per share (1)							Weighted-average common shares used in the computation of loss per share (1)
Basic and diluted		17,750,214			17,688,471				17,753,691			17,703,886			17,751,962			17,696,221

(1)	All outstanding share amounts and computations using such amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the June 3, 2014 one-for-ten reverse stock split.

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SWISHER HYGIENE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

Three Months Ended March 31,
2015 2014
Operating activities
Net loss $ (8,831 ) $ (13,792 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 4,590 5,359
Provision for doubtful accounts 247 241
Stock based compensation 109 496
Deferred income taxes 19 5
Impairment loss on assets held for sale - 2,028
Loss on sale of assets held for sale - 605
(Gain) loss on sale of assets (287 ) 24
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 751 1,253
Inventory 2,310 (123 )
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other current liabilities (3,767 ) 3,588
Other assets and non-current assets (1,079 ) 1,040
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations (5,938 ) 724
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations - (1,987 )
Cash used in operating activities (5,938 ) (1,263 )
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment (1,716 ) (1,949 )
Cash received on sale of property and equipment 347 -
Cash received on sale of assets held for sale - 462
Cash used in investing activities (1,369 ) (1,487 )
Financing activities
Principal payments on debt (1,007 ) (1,182 )
Proceeds from debt issuances 1,622 -
Proceeds from line of credit, net of issuance costs 3,245 -
Proceeds from capital lease 10 -
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities 3,870 (1,182 )

							Six Months Ended June 30,
							2015			2014
Operating activities
Net loss from continuing operations							$	(16,521	)	$	(28,939	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization								9,120			10,533
Provision for doubtful accounts								553			231
Stock based compensation								208			1,011
Deferred income taxes								37			(51	)
Impairment loss on assets held for sale								-			2,989
Impairment loss on intangible assets								166
Impairment loss on goodwill								-			5,821
Loss on sale of assets								339			54
(Gain) loss on sale of assets held for sale								(1,190	)		814
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable								1,406			1,732
Inventory								1,834			(512	)
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other current liabilities								(497	)		3,113
Other assets and non-current assets								(2,962	)		1,421
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations								(7,507	)		(1,783	)
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations								-			(2,069	)
Cash used in operating activities								(7,507	)		(3,852	)
Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment								(2,962	)		(4,049	)
Cash received on sale of assets held for sale								4,463			54
Cash received on sale of property and equipment								42			1,149
Restricted cash								-			1,087
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities								1,543			(1,759	)
Financing activities
Principal payments on debt								(2,147	)		(2,525	)
Proceeds from debt issuances								1,934			-
Proceeds from line of credit, net of issuance costs								3,935			-
Payments on line of credit								(3,324	)
Proceeds from capital lease								10			-
Taxes paid related to income tax withheld on settlement of equity awards								(5	)		(22	)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities								403			(2,547	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(3,437	)		(3,932	)		(5,561	)		(8,158	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		7,233			21,465			7,233			21,465
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	3,796		$	17,533		$	1,672		$	13,307

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SWISHER HYGIENE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and therefore do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP and the SEC for annual financial statements. The Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments that management believes are necessary for the fair presentation of their financial position, results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the periods presented. The information at December 31, 2014 in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance ~~Sheet~~Sheets included in this quarterly report was derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on April 1, 2015. The Company's 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K is referred to in this quarterly report as the “2014 Annual Report.” This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the 2014 Annual Report.

Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Tabular information, other than share and per share data, is presented in thousands of dollars. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts for consistency with the current period presentation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods.

The Company's significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2014 Annual Report. There have been no significant changes to those policies.

On June 3, 2014, a one-for-ten reverse split of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock, $0.001 par value per share, became effective ("Reverse Stock Split"). Trading of the common stock on a post-Reverse Stock Split adjusted basis began at the open of business on the morning of June 3, 2014. All historic share and per share information, including loss per share, in this Form 10-Q have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.

Going Concern

Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared on a going concern basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that we will continue in operation for the next twelve months and will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business and does not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from our inability to continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has not generated positive cash flows from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In order for us to continue operations beyond the next twelve months and be able to discharge our liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business, we must do, but not limited to, some or all of the following: (i) improve operating results through improved customer retention, profitable organic revenue growth, and continued improvements in cost efficiencies; (ii) sell additional ~~non-core or non-essential~~ assets; (iii) raise additional equity; and/or (iv) obtain additional financing through debt. There can be no assurance that we will be able to improve operating results or obtain additional funds by selling additional ~~non-core or non-essential~~ assets, raising additional equity or obtaining additional financing when needed or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to us.

If we are not able to improve operating results or obtain additional funds by selling additional ~~non-core or non-essential~~ assets, continued improvements in cost efficiencies, raising additional equity or obtaining additional financing, material adverse events may occur including, but not limited to: 1) a reduction in the nature and scope of our operations, 2) our inability to fully implement our current business plan, and 3) defaults under the Credit Facility (as defined below). There can be no assurances that we will be able to successfully improve our liquidity position. Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result from the adverse outcome relating to this uncertainty.

Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ASU No. 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this accounting standard raise the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and require new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. This accounting standard update is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and related interim periods, with early adoption allowed. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial results.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU is intended to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue by providing a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; improving comparability of revenue recognition practices; and providing more useful information to users of financial statements through improved revenue disclosure requirements. The provisions of this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, ~~2016.~~2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard and has elected to not adopt the standard early.

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU Update No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. This ASU provides guidance related to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new requirements are effective for the annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard and has elected to not adopt the standard early.

NOTE 2 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Discontinued Operations

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, there were no discontinued operations. For the ~~three months~~six month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014, net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations was ~~$2.0~~$2.1 million and consisted of payments primarily related to legal fees and the settlement of a contractual dispute that the Company accepted responsibility to resolve as a part of the sale of the Waste segment. The Company completed the sale of its Waste segment on November 15, 2012.

Assets Held For Sale

In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, ~~certain non-core linen assets have been classified as assets held for sale in~~ the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the assets were adjusted to the lower of historical carrying amount or fair value. Fair value is based on the estimated sales price, less selling costs, of the assets. Estimates of the net sales proceeds are derived using Level 3 inputs, including the Company’s estimates related to industry multiples of revenues or operating metrics, the status of ongoing sales negotiations and asset purchase agreements where available. The Company’s estimates of fair value require significant judgment and are regularly reviewed and subject to change based on market conditions, changes in the customer base of the operations or routes, and our continuing evaluation as to the facility's acceptable sale price.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company updated its estimates of the fair value of certain linen routes and operations to reflect various events that occurred during the ~~year.~~period. The cumulative impairment loss for the ~~twelve~~six months ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2014 was $3.0 million, of which ~~$1.9~~$1.7 million was attributable to a reduction in the estimate of net sale proceeds for a linen processing operation. The factors driving the ~~$1.9~~$1.7 million reduction were the cancellation notifications, received from three major customers, resulting in a significant loss of forecasted revenue; and the operation’s 2014 year-to-date loss which was in excess of the Company’s estimates. The Company made the decision to close this linen processing operation and the fair value was written down to zero. During the ~~three months ended March 31,~~first quarter of 2015, the Company completed the sale of equipment of this closed operation ~~which resulted~~classified as asset held for sale, resulting in the net receipt of $0.3 million in cash and a $0.3 million gain. The gain is included in “Other income (expense), net” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

During March 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a resolution to sell the Company’s remaining linen operation. In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, these assets were classified as assets held for sale at March 31, 2015 and were adjusted to the lower of historical carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell, which was $3.1 ~~million at March 31, 2015.~~million. The estimated fair value was derived based on the assessment of the potential net selling price. The Company ~~expects that~~completed the sale of this linen operation ~~will be sold~~on May 12, 2015 receiving $4.0 million in cash and notes receivable plus purchased accounts receivables, resulting in a gain of $0.9 million. The gain is included in “Other income (expense), net” in the ~~second quarter~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~2015.~~Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, ~~and 2014,~~ linen related revenue attributable to the assets held for sale and sold linen assets was ~~$1.6~~$0.7 million and ~~$2.7~~$2.3 million, respectively, and $1.1 million and $2.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The 2014 annual revenue was $9.6 ~~million.~~

~~There~~million attributable to the assets held for sale and sold linen assets. As of June 30, 2015, there were no assets held for ~~sale as of December 31, 2014. The major classes of the assets held for sale as of March 31, 2015 are as follows:~~sale.

March 31,
2015
Property and equipment, net $ 1,937
Customer relationships, net 459
Accounts receivable 350
Other, net 330
Total $ 3,076

NOTE 3 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company’s accounting policy is to perform an annual impairment test in the fourth quarter or more frequently whenever events or circumstances indicated that the carrying value of intangible assets may not be recoverable. On a quarterly basis, we monitor the key drivers of fair value to detect the existence of indicators or changes that would warrant an interim impairment test for our intangible assets. Goodwill was fully written-off in the second quarter of 2014 with a non-cash impairment charge of $5.8 million. ~~There~~The Company performed an assessment of its proprietary chemical formulas in the quarter ended June 30, 2015 because of initiatives throughout the organization to reduce the number of active stock keeping units (“SKUs”). Upon completion of the assessment and impairment testing, it was nodetermined that the fair value of formulas was lower than the net book value, resulting in an impairment charge of ~~intangible assets as of March 31, 2015.~~$0.2 million.

Amortization expense on finite lived intangible assets for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $1.7 and $2.0 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $3.4 million and ~~$2.0~~$4.0 million, respectively.

NOTE 4 — INVENTORY

Inventory, net of reserves, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following:

	March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Finished goods	$	10,460	$	12,286	$	10,584	$	12,286
Raw materials		2,286		2,780		2,573		2,780
Work in process		370		360		435		360
Total	$	13,116	$	15,426	$	13,592	$	15,426

NOTE 5 — EQUITY

On May 15, 2014, the Reverse Stock Split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten was approved by the Company’s stockholders. The Reverse Stock Split became effective June 3, 2014, pursuant to a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the State of Delaware. The Company is authorized in its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to issue up to a total of 600,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $.001 per share. The Company’s common stock continues to trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol SWSH under a new CUSIP number. In the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, the Equity section has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split for all periods presented by reducing the line item Common stock and increasing the line item Additional paid-in capital, with no change to Equity in the aggregate.

Changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of the following:

Balance at December 31, 2014	$	81,290
Stock based compensation		208
Payments to cover RSU's		(5	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(19	)
Net loss		(16,521	)
Balance at June 30, 2015	$	64,953

~~Changes in equity for the three months ended March 31, 2015 consisted of the following:~~

Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 81,290
Stock based compensation 109
Foreign currency translation adjustment (26 )
Net loss (8,831 )
Balance at March 31, 2015 $ 72,542

Comprehensive Loss

A summary of the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 is provided below:

	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment			Employee Benefit Plan Adjustment, Net of Tax			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment			Employee Benefit Plan Adjustment, Net of Tax			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(125	)	$	(1,182	)	$	(1,307	)	$	(125	)	$	(1,182	)	$	(1,307	)
Current period other comprehensive loss		(26	)		-			(26	)		(19	)		-			(19	)
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	(151	)	$	(1,182	)	$	(1,333	)
Balance at June 30, 2015										$	(144	)	$	(1,182	)	$	(1,326	)

NOTE 6 — LONG-TERM DEBT AND OBLIGATIONS

	March 31,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Notes payable	$	1,125		$	1,193		$	1,058		$	1,193
Convertible promissory notes, 4.0%: maturing at various dates through 2016		624			832			486			832
Capitalized lease obligations and other financing		1,945			1,044			1,322			1,044
Total debt and obligations		3,694			3,069			2,866			3,069
Long-term debt and obligations due within one year		(2,623	)		(1,884	)		(1,935	)		(1,884	)
Long-term debt and obligations	$	1,071		$	1,185		$	931		$	1,185

Interest on notes payable range between ~~3.6%~~3.7% and 4.0% and mature at various dates through 2019. At the Company’s election, the Company may settle, at any time prior to and including the maturity date, any portion of the outstanding convertible promissory notes’ principal balance of ~~$0.6~~$0.5 million, plus accrued interest, in a combination of cash and shares of common stock. To the extent that the Company’s common stock is part of such settlement, the settlement price is the most recent closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the date of settlement. Although none of these notes have been settled to date with shares, if all notes outstanding at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 were to be settled with shares the Company would issue ~~337,278~~462,700 shares of common stock based on the per share value at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015.

On August 29, 2014, the Company entered into a $20.0 million revolving credit facility, through the execution of a Loan and Security Agreement, by and among the Company, as Guarantor, and certain subsidiaries of the Company and collectively, as Borrower, and Siena Lending Group LLC, as Lender (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures on August 29, 2017.

Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility will accrue at the Base Rate plus 2.00% and will be payable monthly. Base Rate is defined as the greater of (1) the Prime Rate, (2) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, or (3) 3.25%.

Borrowings and availability under the Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base and limitations, and compliance with other terms specified in the agreement. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on certain of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ assets. The calculated borrowing base as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 was ~~$12.3~~$11.0 million, of which $4.1 million was outstanding under letters of credit, ~~$3.2~~$0.6 million was outstanding under borrowings and ~~$5.0~~$6.3 million was unused.

The Credit Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, and certain customary covenants on the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens or other encumbrances, sell or otherwise dispose of assets, and merge or consolidate with other entities or enter into a change of control transaction. The Credit Facility contains various events of ~~default.~~default and certain cash management and reporting requirements. The Company has met all required covenants under the Credit Facility as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015.

The Company entered into a letter agreement, dated as of March 25, 2015, as amended (“Letter Agreement”), with its Lender in respect of the occurrence of a Springing DACA Event, as such term is defined in the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 29, 2014, among the Company, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, and its Lender. The Lender temporarily waived certain cash management requirements and certain expanded reporting requirements that would otherwise go into effect upon occurrence of a Springing DACA Event until May 12, 2015.

The Company has entered into capitalized lease obligations with third party finance companies to finance the cost of certain equipment. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, these obligations bore interest at rates ranging between 4.0% and 18.4% and at December 31, 2014, interest ranged between 4.0% and 18.4%.

The fair value of the Company's debt is estimated based on the current borrowing rates available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and maturities, and approximates the carrying value of these liabilities.

NOTE 7 — OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	March 31,						June 30,						June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
Interest income	$	-		$	4		$	-		$	3		$	-		$	7
Interest expense		(95	)		(78	)		(103	)		(145	)		(197	)		(223	)
Foreign currency		(71	)		(15	)		(100	)		(85	)		(171	)		(100	)
Other		280			(628	)		560			(274	)		839			(903	)
Total other income (expense), net	$	114		$	(717	)	$	357		$	(501	)	$	471		$	(1,219	)

As described in Note 2, “Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale”, “Other” for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, primarily consists of a ~~$0.3~~$0.9 and $1.2 million gain related to ~~the sale of equipment of a~~ closed ~~operation,~~operations, and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014, primarily represents a ~~$0.6~~$0.2 million and $0.8 million loss related to the sale of assets held for sale.

NOTE 8 — SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-	$	20	$	33	$	91

Cash paid for interest	$	95	$	78	$	197	$	223

Cash received from interest	$	-	$	5	$	-	$	7

NOTE 9 — LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss attributable to common stockholders per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock options of which the market price of the common stock is higher than the exercise price of the related stock awards and unvested restricted stock units of ~~6,603~~75 were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock options of which the market price of the common stock is higher than the exercise price of the related stock awards and unvested restricted stock units of ~~32,480~~21,479 were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014 since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

NOTE 10 — INCOME TAXES

In projecting the Company’s income tax expense for 2015, management has concluded that it is not more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets and as a result a full valuation allowance will be required as of December 31, 2015. Therefore, the Company has not recognized a tax benefit as it relates to the current loss for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015.

For the three month and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company has recorded an estimate for income taxes based on the Company’s projected income tax expense for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2015. The Company’s tax provision has an unusual relationship to pretax loss mainly because of the existence of a full deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This circumstance generally results in a zero net tax provision since the income tax expense or benefit that would otherwise be recognized is offset by the change to the valuation allowance. However, tax expense recorded in the first and second quarter of 2015 included the accrual of income tax expense related to an additional valuation allowance in connection with the tax amortization of the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets that was not available to offset existing deferred tax assets (termed a “naked credit”). Specifically, the Company does not consider the deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite lived intangible assets when determining the need for a valuation allowance.

NOTE 11— RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company paid fees for training course development and utilization of the delivery platform from a company, the majority of which is owned by a partnership in which a significant shareholder, former director and three former executives of the Company have a controlling interest. Fees paid during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 were less than $0.1 ~~million, respectively.~~million.

As discussed further below in Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies,” the Company entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “Cavalier Agreement”) with a plant in connection with its acquisition of Sanolite in July 2011. The Cavalier Agreement was terminated in September 2014, pursuant to the terms of the agreement. In connection with the acquisition in 2011, two of the owners of both Sanolite and the manufacturing plant became Company employees. There were no purchases, pursuant to the Cavalier Agreement, for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and ~~$1.5~~$1.6 million ~~at March 31, 2014.~~and $3.1 million for the three and six months ending June 30, 2014, respectively. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, there were no balances included in accounts payable due to this entity, and at December 31, 2014, the Company had ~~less than $0.1 million and~~ $0.3 million included in accounts payable due to this ~~entity, respectively.~~entity. As described below, the transactions pursuant to the Cavalier Agreement were considered to be conducted at the going market prices for such products.

The Company is obligated to make lease payments pursuant to certain real property and equipment lease agreements with employees that were former owners of acquired companies. Such lease payments made were $0.2 million during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014, and were ~~$0.2 million.~~$0.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees

In connection with a distribution agreement entered into in December 2010, the Company provided a guarantee that the ~~distributor's~~distributor’s operating cash flows associated with the agreement would not fall below certain agreed-to minimums, subject to certain pre-defined conditions, over the ten year term of the distribution agreement. If the ~~distributor's~~distributor’s annual operating cash flow does fall below the agreed-to annual minimums, the Company will reimburse the distributor for any such short fall up to a pre-designated amount. No value was assigned to the fair value of the guarantee at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, based on a probability assessment of the projected cash flows. Management currently does not believe that it is probable that any amounts will be paid under this agreement and thus there is no amount accrued for the guarantee in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. This liability would be considered a Level 3 financial instrument given the unobservable inputs used in the projected cash flow model.

As discussed above in Note 11, “Related Party Transactions,” the Company entered into the Cavalier Agreement. The agreement, which was scheduled to expire on December 31, 2012, was extended for an additional two year period with an automatic 18-month renewal term and a six month termination provision. The agreement provides for pricing adjustments, up or down, on the first of each month based on the ~~vendor's~~vendor’s actual average product costs incurred during the prior month. Additional product payments made by the Company due to the vendors pricing adjustment as a result of this agreement have not been significant and have not represented costs materially above the going market price for such product. The Cavalier Agreement was terminated in September 2014 pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

LEGAL MATTERS

We may be involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty and no assurance can be given that the ultimate resolution of any legal or administrative proceedings or disputes will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Securities Litigation

On May 21, 2012, a stockholder derivative action was brought against the ~~Company's~~Company’s former CEO and former CFO and the ~~Company's~~Company’s then directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by a purported Company stockholder in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In this derivative action, captioned Arsenault v. Berrard, et al., 1:12-cv-4028, the plaintiff seeks to recover for the Company damages arising out of the ~~Company's~~Company’s March 28, 2012 announcement regarding the Board of Director’s conclusion that the ~~Company's~~Company’s previously issued interim financial statements for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011, and the other financial information in the ~~Company's~~Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods then ended, should no longer be relied upon and that an internal review by the ~~Company's~~Company’s Audit Committee primarily relating to possible adjustments to the ~~Company's~~Company’s financial statements was ongoing.

On August 13, 2012, the Arsenault derivative action, along with ~~other~~a related putative securities class ~~actions~~action pending in the Southern District of New York, was transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina where other related putative securities class ~~actions.~~actions were pending. All ~~action~~actions were consolidated under the caption In re Swisher Hygiene, Inc. Securities and Derivative Litigation, MDL No. 2384. On August 21, 2012, the Western District of North Carolina issued an order governing the practice and procedure in the actions transferred to the Western District of North Carolina as well as the actions originally filed there. On October 18, 2012, the Western District of North Carolina held an Initial Pretrial Conference at which it appointed lead counsel and lead plaintiffs for the securities class actions, and set a schedule for the filing of a consolidated class action complaint and ~~defendants'~~defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond to the consolidated class action complaint. The Western District of North Carolina stayed the Arsenault derivative action, pending the outcome of the securities class actions.

On August 6, 2014, following a hearing, the Western District of North Carolina approved a settlement of the securities class actions, and issued an Order and Final Judgment that, among other things, dismissed the securities class actions pending in the United States with prejudice and provided for full and complete releases to defendants. The Arsenault derivative action is still pending.

On June 11, 2013, an individual action was filed in the United ~~States.~~States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Miller, et al. v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc., et al., No. 0:13-CV-61292-JAL, against the Company, its former CEO and former CFO, and a former Company director, bringing state and federal claims founded on the allegations that in deciding to sell their company to the Company, plaintiffs relied on ~~defendants'~~defendants’ statements about such things as the ~~Company's~~Company’s accounting and internal controls, which, in light of the Company’s restatement of its financial statements, were false. On July 17, 2013, the Company notified the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("(“MDL ~~Panel"~~Panel”) of this action, and requested that it be transferred and centralized in the Western District of North Carolina with the other actions pending there. On July 23, 2013, the MDL Panel issued a Conditional Transfer Order (the ~~"Miller CTO"~~“Miller CTO”), conditionally transferring the case to the Western District of North Carolina. On July 29, 2013, plaintiffs notified the MDL Panel that they would seek to vacate the Miller CTO. In light of the proceedings in the MDL Panel, defendants requested that the Southern District of Florida stay all proceedings pending the MDL ~~Panel's~~Panel’s ruling. On August 6, 2013, the Southern District of Florida issued a stay of all proceedings pending a ruling by the MDL Panel. On October 2, 2013, following briefing on the issue of whether the Miller CTO should be vacated, the MDL Panel issued an order transferring the action to the Western District of North Carolina. The Company and the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint on March 20, 2014. Briefing on the motions to dismiss was completed on May 12, 2014. On June 2, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion with the Western District of North Carolina seeking a suggestion for remand from that ~~Court~~court to the MDL Panel. Briefing on that motion was completed on June 26, 2014. Oral argument on the motions to dismiss and motion for suggestion for remand were heard on July 22, 2014. On August 5, 2014, the Western District of North Carolina denied ~~plaintiffs'~~plaintiffs’ motion for suggestion for remand. On October 22, 2014, the Company filed a notice of supplemental authority in support of its motion to dismiss the ~~complaint in this action.~~complaint. On November 4, 2014, plaintiffs filed a response to the notice of supplemental authority.

On ~~December 17, 2013, a purported stockholder commenced a putative securities class action on behalf~~July 8, 2015, the Western District of ~~purchasers of the Company's common stock~~North Carolina ruled on the ~~Toronto Stock Exchange or any other Canadian trading platforms in the Ontario Superior Court~~motions to dismiss. The Western District of ~~Justice, captioned Edwards v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc., et al., CV 13-20282 CP,~~North Carolina dismissed plaintiffs’ federal claims and certain of their state law claims. Other state law claims against the Company, ~~the~~its former CEO, and a former ~~CFO. The~~Company director, were not dismissed. After issuing its ruling, the Western District of North Carolina recommended by letter to the MDL Panel that the action ~~alleges claims under Canadian law for alleged misrepresentations~~be transferred back to the Southern District of Florida. On July 16, 2015, the ~~Company's financial position relating to its business acquisitions. On February 13, 2014, a Fresh Statement~~Western District of ~~Claim and Fresh Notice of Action were filed, adding~~North Carolina issued an additional named plaintiff. On March 28, 2014, another purported stockholder commenced a putative securities class action on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange or any other Canadian trading platformsorder staying all proceedings in the ~~Ontario Superior Court of Justice, captioned Phillips v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc., et al., CV 14-00501096-0000, against~~action pending a determination by the ~~Company, the former CEO, the former CFO and the Company's former Senior Vice President and Treasurer. The action alleges claims under Canadian law stemming from the Company's restatement.~~MDL Panel on its recommendation.

Although the Company believed it had meritorious defenses to the asserted claims in the two securities class actions pending in Canada, the defendants agreed to terms of settlement and executed a settlement agreement resolving all claims in both securities class actions pending there, which was approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice by Order dated February 13, 2015 (the "Canadian Settlement"). The Canadian Settlement provides that defendants will make a set cash payment totaling $0.7 million, including legal fees, all from insurance proceeds, to settle all of the Canadian securities class actions, with full and complete releases provided to the defendants. Notice has been given of the Canadian Settlement.

Other Matters

The Company has been contacted by the staff of the Atlanta Regional Office of the SEC and by the United States ~~Attorney's~~Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina (the ~~"U.S. Attorney's Office"~~“U.S. Attorney’s Office”) after the ~~Company's~~Company’s March 28, 2012 public announcement of the Audit ~~Committee's~~Committee’s internal review and the delays in filing its periodic reports. The Company has been asked to make certain individuals available and to provide certain information about these matters to the SEC and the U.S. ~~Attorney's~~Attorney’s Office. The Company is fully cooperating with the SEC and the U.S. ~~Attorney's~~Attorney’s Office. Any action by the SEC, the U.S. ~~Attorney's~~Attorney’s Office or other government agency could result in fines and/or criminal or civil sanctions against the Company and/or certain of its current or former officers, directors or employees.

NOTE 13 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In August 2015, the Company sold its wholly owned subsidiary which conducted all of the Company's operations in Canada for total proceeds of $2.769 million. The difference between the sale price and the carrying value of the assets sold will be accounted for in the third quarter of 2015 and the Company expects to record a gain at that time.

ITEM 2.

~~MANAGEMENT'S~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as our “Selected Financial Data” and our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included in Item 6 and Item 8, respectively, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “2014 Form 10-K”). In addition to historical consolidated financial information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Actual results could differ from these expectations as a result of certain risk factors, including those described under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 2014 Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Business Overview

We currently operate in one business segment, Hygiene, which encompasses providing essential hygiene and sanitizing service solutions to customers in a wide range of end-markets, including foodservice, hospitality, retail and healthcare industries. Certain of our products are registered with the Environmental Protection Agency and follow the Center for Disease Control guidelines for disinfection of surface areas such as children’s playgrounds, hospitals, and assisted living environments. We sell consumable products such as detergents, cleaning chemicals, soap, paper, water filters and supplies, together with the rental and servicing of dish machines and other equipment for the dispensing of those products as well as additional services such as the deep cleaning and sanitizing of restrooms and other facilities. We continue to see the positive impact of cost efficiencies, capital resource management and planning, plant consolidations and route optimization efforts; however, we believe we still need to increase revenue in order to maximize our profitability. We are committed to our philosophy of Service, People and Profitability and to Selling Through Service. To that end, we ~~have commenced a~~are continuing our realignment of our field service and sales teams to better serve our customers since we believe this will ultimately drive increased revenues through improved customer retention and the ability to leverage our current customer base.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses. We believe the most complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to the Consolidated Financial Statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K, describe these significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies since the filing of the 2014 Form 10-K.

Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Assets Held for Sale

In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, ~~these assets have been classified as assets held for sale in~~ the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the assets were adjusted to the lower of historical carrying amount or fair value. Fair value is based on the estimated sales price, less selling costs, of the assets. Estimates of the net sales proceeds are derived using Level 3 inputs, including the Company’s estimates related to industry multiples of revenues or operating metrics, the status of ongoing sales negotiations and asset purchase agreements where available. The Company’s estimates of fair value require significant judgment and are regularly reviewed and subject to change based on market conditions, changes in the customer base of the operations or routes, and our continuing evaluation as to the facility's acceptable sale price.

RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH 31,~~JUNE 30, 2015

Revenue

Revenue from products is primarily comprised of the sales and delivery of consumable products such as detergents and cleaning chemicals, the rental, sales and servicing of dish machines and other equipment used to dispense those products, the sale of paper items, rental fees, linen processing and other ancillary product sales. Revenues from services are primarily comprised of manual cleaning and delivery service fees. Franchise and other consists of fees charged to franchisees.

Total revenue and the revenue derived from each revenue type for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

2015 % 2014 %
Revenue (In thousands)
Products $ 39,263 89.5% $ 43,241 89.6%
Services 4,328 9.9% 4,694 9.7%
Franchise and other 250 0.6% 360 0.7%
Total revenue $ 43,841 100.0% $ 48,295 100.0%

	2015		%			2014		%
Revenue			(In thousands)
Products	$	40,160		89.6	%	$	44,780		89.7	%
Services		4,398		9.8	%		4,809		9.6	%
Franchise and other		276		0.6	%		366		0.7	%
Total revenue	$	44,834		100.0	%	$	49,955		100.0	%

Consolidated revenue decreased ~~$4.5~~$5.1 million or ~~9.2%~~10.3% to ~~$43.8~~$44.8 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. Excluding revenue generated from linen assets sold and held for sale for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014, consolidated revenue decreased ~~7.2%~~6.8% on a comparable basis. Product revenue decreased ~~$4.0~~$4.6 million partially due to a ~~$1.2~~$1.9 million decrease related to linen assets sold or held for sale. The remaining ~~$2.8~~$2.7 million decrease is primarily due to a ~~$1.8~~$0.9 million reduction in purchasing from large wholesale and distribution customers, and the attrition of ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million in customers resulting from the termination of the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “Cavalier Agreement”) which was terminated in September ~~2014.~~2014, as well as $1.4 million of additional attrition, volume reductions and strategic separations from customers due to lack of profitability. Service revenues declined $0.4 million due to the loss of hygiene customers and customers sold in connection with assets held for sale. Franchise and other revenue declined $0.1 million primarily due to the timing of purchases with one of our international ~~licensee.~~licensees.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of chemical, paper, air freshener and other consumable products sold to, or used in the servicing of, our customers. These costs are exclusive of route expense and related depreciation and amortization. Cost of sales for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015		%(1)		2014	%(1)	2015			%(1)			2014	%(1)
Cost of Sales				(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Products	$	19,852	50.6%	$	21,580	49.9%	$	20,604		51.3	%	$	22,778	50.9	%
Services		1	0.0%		134	2.9%		(4	)	-0.1	%		131	2.7	%
Franchise and other		109	43.9%		98	27.2%		106		38.4	%		64	17.5	%
Total cost of sales	$	19,962	45.5%	$	21,812	45.2%	$	20,706		46.2	%	$	22,973	46.0	%

~~(1)~~ ~~Represents cost as a percentage of the respective product and service line revenue.~~

(1)	Represents cost as a percentage of the respective product and service line revenue.

Cost of sales decreased ~~$1.9~~$2.3 million or ~~8.5%~~9.9% to ~~$20.0~~$20.7 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, compared to 2014 primarily due to a decline in sales volume. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue from the prior-year period primarily reflects the impact of exiting the linen business, partially offset by cost efficiencies. As a percentage of sales, consolidated cost of sales increased slightly from ~~45.2%~~46.0% to ~~45.5%~~46.2%.

Route Expenses

Route expenses consist of costs incurred by the Company for the delivery of products and providing services to customers. The components of route expenses for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015		%(1)		2014	%(1)	2015		%(1)			2014	%(1)
Route Expenses				(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Compensation	$	9,127	20.9%	$	9,417	19.7%	$	8,896	20.0	%	$	9,847	19.9	%
Vehicle and other expenses		2,565	5.9%		2,947	6.1%		2,734	6.1	%		2,751	5.5	%
Total route expenses	$	11,692	26.8%	$	12,364	25.8%	$	11,630	26.1	%	$	12,598	25.4	%

(1)	~~(1)~~Represents route expenses as a percentage of total non-franchise revenue.

Route expenses decreased ~~$0.7~~$1.0 million or ~~5.4%~~7.7% to ~~$11.7~~$11.6 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. The components of this change were decreases in compensation, primarily through route optimization efforts, of ~~$0.3 million and also decreases in vehicle and other expenses of $0.4~~$1.0 million. Route expense as a percentage of total revenue was ~~26.8%~~26.1% and ~~25.8%~~25.4% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the decline in revenue from the prior period.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of the costs incurred for:

●	Local office and field management support costs that are related to field operations. These costs include compensation, occupancy expense and other general and administrative expenses.

●	Selling expenses which include compensation and commissions for local sales representatives and corporate account representatives.

●	Marketing expenses.

●	Corporate office expenses which include executive management, information technology, human resource, accounting, purchasing and other support costs.

The details of selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015		%(1)		2014	%(1)	2015		%(1)			2014	%(1)
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses				(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Compensation	$	8,646	19.7%	$	10,916	22.6%	$	7,906	17.6	%	$	10,007	20.0	%
Occupancy		1,664	3.8%		2,081	4.3%		1,720	3.8	%		1,820	3.6	%
Other		6,204	14.2%		6,773	14.0%		6,232	13.9	%		5,307	10.6	%
Total selling, general & administrative expenses	$	16,514	37.7%	$	19,770	40.9%	$	15,858	35.4	%	$	17,134	34.2	%

~~(1)~~ ~~Represents expenses as a percentage of total revenue.~~

(1)	Represents expenses as a percentage of total revenue.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased ~~$3.3~~$1.3 million to ~~$16.5~~$15.9 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2014. The components of this change were decreases in compensation of ~~$2.3~~$2.1 million, occupancy of ~~$0.4~~$0.1 million, and offset by an increase in other expenses of ~~$0.6~~$0.9 million. Compensation expense decreased primarily due to headcount reductions primarily due to the sale of the linen business, a reduction in stock based compensation and ~~the sale of the linen businesses.~~other operational efforts. Occupancy decreased due to the closure of a linen plant, the sale of a linen plant and due to ongoing efforts to reduce facility infrastructure costs. Other expenses ~~decreased~~increased primarily due to ~~the decrease~~an increase in professional ~~fees.~~fees of $0.5 million, an increase in bad debt expense of $0.2 million and an increase in bank charges of $0.1 million.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization consists of depreciation of property and equipment and the amortization of intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization decreased ~~$0.8~~$0.6 million to ~~$4.6~~$4.5 million or ~~14.4%~~12.5% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily ~~due to~~ the ~~categorization~~result of ~~certain~~ fixed assets ~~as assets held for sale.~~being fully depreciated and a decrease in capital expenditures.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Details of other income (expense), net for three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Interest income	$	-		$	4		$	-		$	3
Interest expense		(95	)		(78	)		(102	)		(145	)
Foreign currency loss		(71	)		(15	)		(100	)		(85	)
Other income (expense)		280			(628	)		559			(274	)
Total other income (expense), net	$	114		$	(717	)	$	357		$	(501	)

The increase in other income is due primarily to the ~~$0.3~~$0.9 million gain related to the sale of ~~equipment~~a linen facility during the second quarter of 2015, offset by impairment loss on intangible assets of $0.2 million and loss on sale of assets of $0.3 million compared to the loss on sale of certain assets held for sale during the first quarter of 2014.

Income Tax Expense

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company has recorded an estimate for income taxes based on the Company’s projected income tax expense for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2015. The Company’s tax provision has an unusual relationship to pretax loss mainly because of the existence of a ~~closed operation~~full deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This circumstance generally results in a zero tax provision since the income tax expense or benefit that would otherwise be recognized is offset by the change to the valuation allowance. However, tax expense recorded in the first and second quarter of 2015 included the accrual of income tax expense related to an additional valuation allowance in connection with the tax amortization of the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets that was not available to offset existing deferred tax assets (termed a ��naked credit”). The Company does not consider the deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite lived intangible assets when determining the need for a valuation allowance.

RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

Revenue

Total revenue and the revenue derived from each revenue type for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015		%			2014		%
Revenue			(In thousands)
Products	$	79,423		89.6	%	$	88,021		89.6	%
Services		8,727		9.8	%		9,503		9.7	%
Franchise and other		526		0.6	%		726		0.7	%
Total revenue	$	88,676		100.0	%	$	98,250		100.0	%

Consolidated revenue decreased $9.6 million or 9.7% to $88.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. Excluding revenue generated from linen assets sold and held for sale for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, consolidated revenue decreased 6.5% on a comparable basis. Product revenue decreased $8.6 million partially due to a $3.1 million decrease related to linen assets sold or held for sale. The remaining $5.5 million decrease is primarily due to a $1.4 million reduction in purchasing from large wholesale and distribution customers, the attrition of $0.7 million in customers resulting from the termination of the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “Cavalier Agreement”) which was terminated in September 2014, as well as $3.4 million of additional attrition, volume reductions and strategic separations from customers due to lack of profitability. Service revenues declined $0.8 million due to the loss of hygiene customers and customers sold in connection with assets held for sale. Franchise and other revenue declined $0.2 million primarily due to the timing of purchases with one of our international licensee.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of chemical, paper, air freshener and other consumable products sold to, or used in the servicing of our customers. These costs are exclusive of route expense and related depreciation and amortization. Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015			%(1)			2014	%(1)
Cost of Sales				(In thousands)
Products	$	40,456		50.9	%	$	44,358	50.4	%
Services		(3	)	0.0	%		265	2.8	%
Franchise and other		215		40.9	%		162	22.3	%
Total cost of sales	$	40,668		45.9	%	$	44,785	45.6	%

Represents cost as a percentage of the respective product and service line revenue.

Cost of sales decreased $4.1 million or 9.2% to $40.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 2014 primarily due to a decline in sales volume. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue from the prior-year period primarily reflects the impact of exiting the linen business, partially offset by cost efficiencies. As a percentage of sales, consolidated cost of sales increased slightly from 45.6% to 45.9%.

Route Expenses

Route expenses consist of costs incurred by the Company for the delivery of products and providing services to customers. The components of route expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015		%(1)			2014	%(1)
Route Expenses			(In thousands)
Compensation	$	18,023	20.4	%	$	19,264	19.8	%
Vehicle and other expenses		5,298	6.0	%		5,697	5.8	%
Total route expenses	$	23,321	26.4	%	$	24,961	25.6	%

Represents route expenses as a percentage of total non-franchise revenue.

Route expenses decreased $1.6 million or 6.6% to $23.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. The components of this change were decreases in compensation, primarily through route optimization efforts, of $1.2 million and also decreases in vehicle and other expenses of $0.4 million. Route expense as a percentage of total revenue was 26.4% and 25.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the decline in revenue from the prior period.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of the costs incurred for:

●	Local office and field management support costs that are related to field operations. These costs include compensation, occupancy expense and other general and administrative expenses.

●	Selling expenses which include compensation and commissions for local sales representatives and corporate account representatives.

●	Marketing expenses.

●	Corporate office expenses which include executive management, information technology, human resource, accounting, purchasing and other support costs.

The details of selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015		%(1)			2014	%(1)
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses			(In thousands)
Compensation	$	16,552	18.7	%	$	20,922	21.3	%
Occupancy		3,384	3.8	%		3,901	4.0	%
Other		12,434	14.0	%		12,081	12.3	%
Total selling, general & administrative expenses	$	32,370	36.5	%	$	36,904	37.6	%

Represents expenses as a percentage of total revenue.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $4.5 million to $32.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2014. The components of this change were decreases in compensation of $4.4 million, occupancy of $0.5 million, offset by an increase in other expenses of $0.4 million. Compensation expense decreased primarily due to headcount reductions, primarily due to the sale of the linen business, a reduction in stock based compensation and other operational optimization efforts. Occupancy decreased due to the closure of a linen plant and due to ongoing efforts to reduce facility infrastructure costs. Other expenses increased primarily due to increases in bad debt expense of $0.3 million and bank charges of $0.2 million, offset by decreases in other SG&A of $0.1 million.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization consists of depreciation of property and equipment and the amortization of intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization decreased $1.4 million to $9.1 million or 13.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily the result of fixed assets being fully depreciated and a decrease in capital expenditures.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Details of other income (expense), net for six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Interest income	$	-		$	7
Interest expense		(197	)		(223	)
Foreign currency loss		(171	)		(100	)
Other income (expense)		839			(903	)
Total other income (expense), net	$	471		$	(1,219	)

The increase in other income is due primarily to the $0.9 million gain related to the sale of a linen facility during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2015, compared to the loss on sales of certain assets held for sale during the first quarter of 2014.

Income Tax Expense

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, the Company has recorded an estimate for income taxes based on the Company’s projected income tax expense for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2015. The Company’s tax provision has an unusual relationship to pretax loss mainly because of the existence of a full deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This circumstance generally results in a zero tax provision since the income tax expense or benefit that would otherwise be recognized is offset by the change to the valuation allowance. However, tax expense recorded in the first and second quarter of 2015 included the accrual of income tax expense related to an additional valuation allowance in connection with the tax amortization of the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets that was not available to offset existing deferred tax assets (termed a “naked credit”). The Company does not consider the deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite lived intangible assets when determining the need for a valuation allowance.

Cash Flows Summary

Cash flows from continuing operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and 2014 were:

	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(5,938	)	$	724
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,369	)		(1,487	)
Net cash used in operating activities							$	(7,507	)	$	(1,783	)
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities								1,543			(1,759	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		3,870			(1,182	)		403			(2,547	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations	$	(3,437	)	$	(1,945	)	$	(5,561	)	$	(6,089	)

Net cash used in operating ~~activities of $5.9 million~~activies increased by ~~$6.7~~$5.7 million primarily due to a ~~$7.5~~$6.0 million change in ~~working capital.~~operating assets and liabilities as the net loss for both periods, as adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation and amortization, impairment and (gain) loss on sale of assets, was relatively constant. Net cash ~~used in~~provided by investing activities ~~decreased $0.1 million.~~increased by $3.3 million, primarily due to a $1.1 million reduction in purchase of property and equipment and a $3.3 million increase in cash received from sale of assets held for sale and property and equipment offset by a $1.1 million change in restricted cash. Cash provided by financing activities was ~~$3.9~~$0.4 million compared with ~~$1.2~~$2.5 million used during the same period in 2014. The increase of ~~$5.1~~$2.9 million was primarily due to an increase in proceeds from debt issuances related to insurance financing of ~~$1.6~~$1.9 million and ~~proceeds from~~payments on the line ~~the~~ of credit of ~~$3.2~~$3.9 million, offset by proceeds from the line of credit of $3.3 million, and a decrease in principal payments on debt of $0.4 million.

Cash flows ~~from~~used in discontinued operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2014 were $2.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, ~~and 2014 were:~~

2015 2014
(In thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations $ - $ (1,987 )
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations $ - $ (1,987 )
there were no discontinued operations.

Cash flows used in operating activities from discontinued operations in 2014 consisted of payments made related to legal fees and a settlement payment related to a contractual dispute that the Company accepted responsibility to resolve as a part of the sale of the Waste segment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Going Concern

If we are not able to improve operating results or obtain additional funds by selling additional ~~non-core or non-essential~~ assets, continuing improvements in cost efficiencies, raising additional equity or obtaining additional financing, material adverse events may occur including, but not limited to: 1) a reduction in the nature and scope of our operations, 2) our inability to fully implement our current business plan, and 3) defaults under the Credit Facility. There can be no assurances that we will be able to successfully improve our liquidity position. Our consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result from the adverse outcome relating to this uncertainty.

1618

Cash Requirements

As a result of the activities discussed above, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by ~~$3.4~~$5.5 million to ~~$3.8~~$1.7 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 compared to $7.2 million at December 31, 2014. Our cash requirements for the next twelve months consist primarily of: (i) capital expenditures associated with dispensing equipment, dish machines and other items in service at customer locations, equipment, vehicles and software; (ii) working capital; and (iii) payment of principal and interest on borrowings under our convertible promissory notes, acquisition notes payable and capital lease obligations and other financing. We expect that through capital resource management and the use of additional customer equipment programs, our annual capital expenditures in 2015 ~~will~~are expected to be less than 2014 capital expenditures of $8.6 million.

We expect that our cash on hand, the cash flow provided by operating activities along with availability under our Credit Facility, and the cash flow from investing activities, including the potential sale of assets, ~~held for~~such as the sale of the Company's Canadian operations in August of 2015 as discussed in Note 13 of the financial statements, will be sufficient to execute our business plan for the next twelve months. However, we believe it is contingent upon improved customer retention, profitable organic growth and continued improvement in cost efficiencies in 2015. Failure to execute our plan successfully or unforecasted shortfalls in available cash may require us to alter our plan, sell other ~~non-core or non-essential~~ assets, or raise additional equity which could be dilutive to existing shareholders or obtain additional financing through debt. There can be no assurances that we could sell assets in a timely manner, or that such equity and debt ~~and~~would be available and would be likely subject to prevailing market conditions and the ~~company’s~~Company’s performance.

Credit Facility

On August 29, 2014, we entered into a $20.0 million revolving credit facility, through the execution of a Loan and Security Agreement, by and among the Company, as Guarantor, and certain subsidiaries of the Company and collectively, as Borrower, and Siena Lending Group LLC, as Lender (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures on August 29, 2017.

Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility will accrue at the Base Rate plus 2.00% and will be payable monthly. The Base Rate is defined as the greater of (1) the Prime Rate, (2) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, or (3) 3.25%.

Borrowings and availability under the Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base and limitations, and compliance with other terms specified in the agreement. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on certain of the Company’s assets. The calculated borrowing base as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 was ~~$12.3~~$11.0 million, of which $4.1 million was outstanding under letters of credit, ~~$3.2~~$0.6 million was outstanding under borrowings and ~~$5.0~~$6.3 million was unused.

The Credit Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, and certain customary covenants on the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens or other encumbrances, sell or otherwise dispose of assets, and merge or consolidate with other entities or enter into a change of control transaction. The Credit Facility contains various events of ~~default.~~default and reporting requirements. The Company has met all required covenants under the Credit Facility as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than operating leases, there are no significant off-balance sheet financing arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships which are often referred to as “variable interest entities.” Therefore, there is no exposure to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise had we engaged in such relationships.

In connection with a distribution agreement entered into in December 2010 between the Company and a distributor of Company-owned products, we provided a guarantee that the ~~distributor's~~distributor’s operating cash flows associated with the agreement would not fall below certain agreed-to minimums, subject to certain pre-defined conditions, over the ten year term of the distribution agreement. If the ~~distributor's~~distributor’s annual operating cash flow does fall below the agreed-to annual minimums, we reimburse the distributor for any such short fall up to a pre-designated amount. No value was assigned to the fair value of this guarantee at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 based on a probability assessment of the projected cash flows. Management currently does not believe that it is probable that any amounts will be paid under this provision in the agreement and thus there is no amount accrued for the guarantee in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1719

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock, may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in this Form 10-Q, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized executive officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend for our forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we set forth this statement and these risk factors in order to comply with such safe harbor provisions. You should note that our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q or when made and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Although we believe that the expectations, plans, intentions and projections reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The risks, uncertainties and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include the following:

●	We have a history of significant operating losses and as such, our future revenue and operating profitability are uncertain.

●	Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report for our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 contains an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

●	The Company may need to raise additional equity or capital in the future and such capital may not be available when needed or at all.

●	Our failure or inability to meet certain terms of our Credit Facility could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

●

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and we may be unable to develop, implement and maintain appropriate controls in future periods. If the material weaknesses are not remediated, then they could result in material misstatements to the financial statements.

●	Failure to retain our current customers and renew existing customer contracts could adversely affect our business.

●	Changes in economic conditions that impact the industries in which our end-users primarily operate in could adversely affect our business.

●	The financial condition and operating ability of third parties may adversely affect our business.

●	We recognized significant impairment charges in 2014 and prior years, and may recognize additional impairment charges in the future which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

●	The availability of our raw materials and the volatility of their costs may adversely affect our operations.

●	We are and may in the future be subject to legal proceedings, the outcome of which are uncertain, and resolutions adverse to us could negatively affect our earnings, financial condition and cash flows.

●	The pricing, terms, and length of customer service agreements may constrain our ability to recover costs and to make a profit on our contracts.

●	If we are required to change the pricing models for our products or services to compete successfully, our margins and operating results may be adversely affected.

●	The consolidation of customers may adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

●	We may fail to maintain our listing on The Nasdaq Stock Market.

●	The loss of one or more key members of our senior management, or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

●	Increases in fuel and energy costs and fuel shortages could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

●	Our products contain hazardous materials and chemicals, which could result in claims against us.

●	We are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations, and may be adversely affected by new and changing laws and regulations, that generate ongoing environmental costs and could subject us to liability.

●	If our products are improperly manufactured, packaged, or labeled or become adulterated or expire, those items may need to be recalled or withdrawn from sale.

●	Changes in the types or variety of our service offerings could affect our financial performance.

●	Prior acquisitions involve a number of risks and could have an adverse effect on results of operations.

●	We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights that are material to our business.

●	Interruptions in our information and telecommunication systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, could adversely affect our business.

●	Insurance policies may not cover all operating risks and a casualty loss beyond the limits of our coverage could adversely impact our business.

●	Our stock price has been and may in the future be volatile, which could cause purchasers of our common stock to incur substantial losses.

●	Certain stockholders may exert significant influence over any corporate action requiring stockholder approval.

●	Provisions of Delaware law and our organizational documents may delay or prevent an acquisition of our Company, even if the acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders.

1921

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks including changes in interest rates and fuel prices. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are indexed to a variable interest rate. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, there was ~~$3.2~~$0.6 million outstanding under borrowings from our Credit Facility, and we have $4.1 million of letters of credit outstanding at a fixed fee under our Credit Facility. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, a hypothetical 10% change in our interest rate would change our results of operations by less than $0.1 million.

We do not use financial instruments for speculative trading purposes and we do not hold derivative financial instruments that could expose us to significant market and commodity risk. We do not currently have any contract with vendors where we have exposure to the underlying commodity prices. In such event, we would consider implementing price increases and pursue cost reduction initiatives; however, we may not be able to pass on these increases in whole or in part to our customers or realize the cost savings needed to offset these increases. This discussion does not consider the effects that may have an adverse change on the overall economy, and it also does not consider actions we may take to mitigate our exposure to these changes. We cannot guarantee that the action we take to mitigate these exposures will be successful.

Fuel costs represent a significant operating expense. To date, we have not entered into any contracts or employed any strategies to mitigate our exposure to fuel costs. Historically, we have made limited use of fuel surcharges or delivery fees to help offset rises in fuel costs. Such potential charges have not been in the past, and we believe will not be going forward, applicable to all customers. Consequently, an increase in fuel costs normally results in a decrease in our operating margin percentage. At our current consumption level, a $0.50 per gallon change in the price of fuel changes our fuel costs by approximately $0.6 million on an annual basis.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and, include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Based upon that evaluation, management concluded that the deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting identified in the 2014 Form 10-K were under ongoing remediation and therefore continue to exist, and as such our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 for the following reasons:

●	We did not maintain an effective control environment as we lacked sufficient oversight of activities related to our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, we did not have a sufficient structure in place to identify and evaluate gaps in the knowledge and technical experience of the accounting personnel responsible for the implementation and execution of our control environment.
●	We did not maintain effective controls over certain control activities. Specifically, the following individual material weaknesses were identified in connection with our control activities:

●

We did not implement effective controls to properly account for the sale, disposal and movement of dish machines at customer locations and our own facilities, which resulted in substantial post-closing journal entries that our review process failed to identify.


	●	We did not implement effective controls to accurately and completely evaluate and calculate our allowance for doubtful accounts. Additionally, our review process was not sufficient to detect material errors in the methodology and calculations of the allowance resulting in material post-closing adjustments.

	●	We did not implement effective controls to properly identify, analyze and account for non-routine transactions reflected in the financial statements.

	●	We did not develop and implement ~~and~~an overall financial reporting review process that encompassed all significant financial statement accounts or contained an appropriate level of precision. This review process did not identify the issues surrounding the accounting and recording for our dish machines, allowance for doubtful accounts, and non-routine transactions.

	●	We did not design, implement and maintain effective controls over the corporate review of significant journal entries processed at our field-level locations, which represents a significant portion of our business, to ensure that these entries were appropriate in nature and correct.

●

We did not maintain effective controls over user security and program change management for the information technology systems and accounting software at the field-level locations.

●

We did not maintain effective controls to ensure the timely preparation of financial records sufficient to allow management adequate time to prevent or detect and correct material misstatements and to fulfill its other control activity responsibilities.

●

We did not maintain effective information and communication controls to generate relevant and quality information for use in the financial reporting close process. These control failures contributed to the transactions involving our dish machines and to information generated relating to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

●		We did not maintain effective information and communication controls with external parties due to delays in our financial statement close process as evidenced by the untimely filing of our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and our failure to identify and timely disclose control deficiencies in previous filings.
●		We did not maintain effective monitoring controls sufficient to ascertain whether key components of internal control were present and functioning, as evidenced by our incorrect initial assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.

●

We did not maintain effective monitoring controls to communicate the deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting to our board of directors in sufficient time to allow them to take corrective action.

~~Management has determined that the control deficiencies identified should be considered material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.~~

A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Based on its evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, management has determined that the control deficiencies identified above should be considered material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

As set forth below, management has taken and will continue to take steps to remediate the control deficiencies identified above. Notwithstanding the control deficiencies identified above, management concludes that the financial statements included in this report fairly represent, in all material aspects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

2123

Management's Remediation Plan

As reported in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, we are engaged in remedial actions in response to the deficiencies discussed above, and we plan to continue efforts underway to improve internal control over financial reporting:

●

Management will continue to enhance its training programs for our accounting personnel both at the corporate and field-level, emphasizing financial reporting responsibilities and accountability for implementing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.

●		Dish machines ~~will be~~are being serialized in the fixed asset system to track the movement of the dish machines and periodic field observations will be performed to ensure the existence and accuracy of these fixed assets.
●		Management will continue to track collection trends across the business and evaluate the accuracy of the assumptions used in the estimates for the allowance for doubtful accounts on an annual basis, at a minimum.

●

Management will put in place controls to properly identify, analyze and account for non-routine transactions and will use the appropriate level of oversight to ensure the transactions are reflected accurately and timely in the financial statements.

●

Management continues to implement controls over user access and change management related to the field-level information technology systems.

●

Management will perform a comprehensive review to re-evaluate our activities related to internal control over financial reporting, including monitoring controls related to the operating effectiveness, timeliness and communication of certain control activities.

While management and our audit committee are closely monitoring the implementation of these remediation plans, there is no assurance that the aforementioned plans will be sufficient to fully remediate the deficiencies identified above and that additional remediation steps may be necessary.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the changes noted above to remediate the previously reported material weaknesses, there have been no adverse changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Securities Litigation

On May 21, 2012, a stockholder derivative action was brought against the Company's former CEO and former CFO and the Company's then directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by a purported Company stockholder in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In this derivative action, captioned Arsenault v. Berrard, et al., 1:12-cv-4028, the plaintiff seeks to recover for the Company damages arising out of the Company's March 28, 2012 announcement regarding the Board of ~~Director’s~~Director's conclusion that the Company's previously issued interim financial statements for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011, and the other financial information in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods then ended, should no longer be relied upon and that an internal review by the Company's Audit Committee primarily relating to possible adjustments to the Company's financial statements was ongoing.

On August 13, 2012, the Arsenault derivative action, along with ~~other~~a related putative securities class ~~actions~~action pending in the Southern District of New York, was transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina where other related putative securities class ~~actions.~~actions were pending. All ~~action~~actions were consolidated under the caption In re Swisher Hygiene, Inc. Securities and Derivative Litigation, MDL No. 2384. On August 21, 2012, the Western District of North Carolina issued an order governing the practice and procedure in the actions transferred to the Western District of North Carolina as well as the actions originally filed there. On October 18, 2012, the Western District of North Carolina held an Initial Pretrial Conference at which it appointed lead counsel and lead plaintiffs for the securities class actions, and set a schedule for the filing of a consolidated class action complaint and defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the consolidated class action complaint. The Western District of North Carolina stayed the Arsenault derivative action, pending the outcome of the securities class actions.

On June 11, 2013, an individual action was filed in the United ~~States.~~States District Court for the Southern District of Florida captioned Miller, et al. v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc., et al., No. 0:13-CV-61292-JAL, against the Company, its former CEO and former CFO, and a former Company director, bringing state and federal claims founded on the allegations that in deciding to sell their company to the Company, plaintiffs relied on defendants' statements about such things as the Company's accounting and internal controls, which, in light of the ~~Company’s~~Company's restatement of its financial statements, were false. On July 17, 2013, the Company notified the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("MDL Panel") of this action, and requested that it be transferred and centralized in the Western District of North Carolina with the other actions pending there. On July 23, 2013, the MDL Panel issued a Conditional Transfer Order (the "Miller CTO"), conditionally transferring the case to the Western District of North Carolina. On July 29, 2013, plaintiffs notified the MDL Panel that they would seek to vacate the Miller CTO. In light of the proceedings in the MDL Panel, defendants requested that the Southern District of Florida stay all proceedings pending the MDL Panel's ruling. On August 6, 2013, the Southern District of Florida issued a stay of all proceedings pending a ruling by the MDL Panel. On October 2, 2013, following briefing on the issue of whether the Miller CTO should be vacated, the MDL Panel issued an order transferring the action to the Western District of North Carolina. The Company and the individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint on March 20, 2014. Briefing on the motions to dismiss was completed on May 12, 2014. On June 2, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion with the Western District of North Carolina seeking a suggestion for remand from that ~~Court~~court to the MDL Panel. Briefing on that motion was completed on June 26, 2014. Oral argument on the motions to dismiss and motion for suggestion for remand were heard on July 22, 2014. On August 5, 2014, the Western District of North Carolina denied plaintiffs' motion for suggestion for remand. On October 22, 2014, the Company filed a notice of supplemental authority in support of its motion to dismiss the ~~complaint in this action.~~complaint. On November 4, 2014, plaintiffs filed a response to the notice of supplemental authority.

On ~~December 17, 2013, a purported stockholder commenced a putative securities class action on behalf~~July 8, 2015, the Western District of ~~purchasers of the Company's common stock~~North Carolina ruled on the ~~Toronto Stock Exchange or any other Canadian trading platforms in the Ontario Superior Court~~motions to dismiss. The Western District of ~~Justice, captioned Edwards v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc., et al., CV 13-20282 CP,~~North Carolina dismissed plaintiffs' federal claims and certain of their state law claims. Other state law claims against the Company, ~~the~~its former CEO, and a former ~~CFO. The~~Company director, were not dismissed. After issuing its ruling, the Western District of North Carolina recommended by letter to the MDL Panel that the action ~~alleges claims under Canadian law for alleged misrepresentations~~be transferred back to the Southern District of Florida. On July 16, 2015, the ~~Company's financial position relating to its business acquisitions. On February 13, 2014, a Fresh Statement~~Western District of ~~Claim and Fresh Notice of Action were filed, adding~~North Carolina issued an additional named plaintiff. On March 28, 2014, another purported stockholder commenced a putative securities class action on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange or any other Canadian trading platformsorder staying all proceedings in the ~~Ontario Superior Court of Justice, captioned Phillips v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc., et al., CV 14-00501096-0000, against~~action pending a determination by the ~~Company, the former CEO, the former CFO and the Company's former Senior Vice President and Treasurer. The action alleges claims under Canadian law stemming from the Company's restatement.~~MDL Panel on its recommendation.

2325

Other Matters

The Company has been contacted by the staff of the Atlanta Regional Office of the SEC and by the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of North Carolina (the "U.S. Attorney's Office") after the Company's March 28, 2012 public announcement of the Audit Committee's internal review and the delays in filing its periodic reports. The Company has been asked to make certain individuals available and to provide certain information about these matters to the SEC and the U.S. Attorney's Office. The Company is fully cooperating with the SEC and the U.S. Attorney's Office. Any action by the SEC, the U.S. Attorney's Office or other government agency could result in fines and/or criminal or civil sanctions against the Company and/or certain of its current or former officers, directors or employees.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results. There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2014 Form 10-K.

~~ITEM 5.~~

~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

On May 11, 2015, the Lender temporarily waived certain cash management requirements and certain expanded reporting requirements that would otherwise go into effect upon the occurrence of a Springing DACA Event until May 12, 2015. ~~For additional information, see Note 6 – Long-term Debt and Obligations of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~ ~~The waiver is filed as Exhibit 10.3, and incorporated herein by reference.~~

2426

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

~~Exhibit Number~~		~~Description~~
~~10.1~~		Second Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Swisher Hygiene Inc. and William M. Pierce, dated January 31, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2015). †
~~10.2~~		Letter Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2015, by and among Siena Lending Group LLC and the Borrowers listed thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2015).
~~10.3~~		~~Waiver Letter, dated May 11, 2015, by Siena Lending Group LLC.~~
~~31.1~~		~~Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.~~
~~31.2~~		~~Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.~~
~~32.1~~		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
~~32.2~~		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
~~101.INS~~		~~XBRL Instance Document.~~
~~101.SCH~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.~~
~~101.CAL~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.~~
~~101.LAB~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.~~
~~101.PRE~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.~~
~~101.DEF~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.~~

~~________________________~~

*Furnished herewith.

~~†Management contacts or compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements.~~

~~SIGNATURES~~

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~

	~~SWISHER HYGIENE INC.~~
	~~(Registrant)~~

~~Dated: May 11, 2015~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/William M. Pierce~~
		~~William M. Pierce~~ ~~President and Chief Executive Officer~~ ~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

~~Dated: May 11, 2015~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/William T. Nanovsky~~
		~~William T. Nanovsky~~ ~~Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer~~ ~~(Principal Financial Officer)~~

~~Dated: May 11, 2015~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/Linda C. Wilson-Ingram~~
		~~Linda C. Wilson-Ingram~~ ~~Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer~~ ~~(Principal Accounting Officer)~~

~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~

Exhibit Number		Description
10.1		~~Second Amendment to Employment Agreement~~Waiver letter, dated May 11, 2015 by ~~and between Swisher Hygiene Inc. and William M. Pierce, dated January 31, 2015~~Siena Lending Group LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.38~~10.3 to the Company's ~~Annual~~Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-Q for the ~~year~~quarter ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2014,~~2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~April 1, 2015).~~ †
~~10.2~~		Letter Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2015, by and among Siena Lending Group LLC and the Borrowers listed thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2015).
~~10.3~~		~~Waiver Letter, dated~~ May 11, ~~2015, by Siena Lending Group LLC.~~2015).
31.1		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2		Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

________________________

*Furnished herewith.

~~†Management contacts or compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements.~~

*	Furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	SWISHER HYGIENE INC.
	(Registrant)

Dated: August 10, 2015	By:	/s/William M. Pierce
		William M. Pierce President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: August 10, 2015	By:	/s/William T. Nanovsky
		William T. Nanovsky Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: August 10, 2015	By:	/s/Linda C. Wilson-Ingram
		Linda C. Wilson-Ingram Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number		Description
10.3		Waiver letter, dated May 11, 2015 by Siena Lending Group LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2015).
31.1		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2		Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

________________________

*	Furnished herewith.