Table of Contents


  
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 1,September 30, 2017
or
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the transition period from                      to                     .
Commission file number: 001-34507

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 11-3664322
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
300 Harmon Meadow Blvd.
Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
(Addresses of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)
(201) 868-5959
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x    No   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x  Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer 
¨   (Do not check if smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company ¨
    Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    Yes  ¨     No  x
As of July 21,October 20, 2017 Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. had 23,789,85223,977,358 shares of common stock outstanding.
 

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial results and performance, future business prospects, implementation of omni-channel retailing, revenue, stores, our ability to implement strategic initiatives, realize improved financial results and meet market expectations, our ability to identify efficiencies and cost reduction opportunities and realize the benefits of potential savings, share and debt repurchases, product offerings, contract manufacturing, supply chain network utilization, intellectual property, store transformation costs, future inventory charges, potential charges related to Nutri-Force, estimated costs to open a new distribution center, working capital, liquidity, capital expenditures, interest costs, industry based factors, including the level of competition in the vitamin, mineral and supplement industry, continued demand from the primary markets Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (the “Company” or “we”) serves, consumer perception of our products, the availability of raw materials, as well as economic conditions generally and factors more specific to the Company such as compliance with manufacturing, healthcare, environmental and other regulations, changes in accounting standards, certifications and practices, and restrictions imposed by the Company’s Convertible Notes and our Revolving Credit Facility (each as defined herein), including financial covenants and limitations on the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness and the Company’s future capital requirements, and other risks, uncertainties and factors set forth under Item 1A., entitled “Risk Factors”, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and in our other reports and documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use ofthose that contain words such as “outlook”, “believes”, “expects”, “potential”, “continues”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “seeks”, “predicts”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, “anticipates”, “target”, “could” or the negative version of these words or other comparable words.
These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, including, among others, product liability claims and recalls, the availability of insurance, the strength of the economy, changes in the overall level of consumer spending, the performance of the Company's products within the prevailing retail environment, trade restrictions, changes in tax policy, regulatory restrictions, political environment, international operations, availability of suitable store locations at appropriate terms, e-commerceecommerce relationships, disruptions of manufacturing, warehouse or distribution facilities or information systems, and other specific factors discussed herein and in other SEC filings by us (including our reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q filed with the SEC).
We believe that all forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions when made; however, we caution that it is impossible to predict actual results or outcomes or the effects of risks, uncertainties or other factors on anticipated results or outcomes with certainty and that, accordingly, one should not place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when made and we undertake no obligation to update these statements in light of subsequent events or developments. Actual results may differ materially from anticipated results or outcomes discussed in any forward-looking statement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
  
Page
No.
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
   
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
  
   
EX 31.1  
EX 31.2  
EX 32.1  
EX 32.2  
EX-101INSTANCE DOCUMENT 
EX-101SCHEMA DOCUMENT 
EX-101CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT 
EX-101DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT 
EX-101LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT 
EX-101PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$2,003
 $2,833
$1,904
 $2,833
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,356 and $1,061 in 2017 and 2016, respectively2,958
 7,367
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,934 and $1,061 in 2017 and 2016, respectively2,922
 7,367
Inventories233,315
 241,736
247,213
 241,736
Prepaid expenses and other current assets36,603
 33,717
39,772
 33,717
Total current assets274,879
 285,653
291,811
 285,653
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $327,031 and $305,777 in 2017 and 2016, respectively151,509
 139,132
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $338,394 and $305,777 in 2017 and 2016, respectively154,496
 139,132
Goodwill46,308
 210,633

 210,633
Other intangibles, net79,104
 79,489
19,579
 79,489
Deferred taxes50,574
 16,847
Other long-term assets30,691
 19,277
2,550
 2,430
Total assets$582,491
 $734,184
$519,010
 $734,184
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities:      
Revolving credit facility$3,000
 $11,000
$12,000
 $11,000
Accounts payable54,216
 65,606
63,591
 65,606
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities63,992
 57,499
65,508
 57,499
Total current liabilities121,208
 134,105
141,099
 134,105
Convertible notes, net123,622
 120,874
125,013
 120,874
Deferred rent39,902
 37,489
40,092
 37,489
Other long-term liabilities2,240
 1,720
2,030
 1,720
Commitments and contingencies
 

 
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized, 24,013,113 shares issued and 23,821,837 shares outstanding at July 1, 2017, and 23,585,240 shares issued and 23,424,055 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016240
 236
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized, 24,167,733 shares issued and 23,972,519 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017, and 23,585,240 shares issued and 23,424,055 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016242
 236
Additional paid-in capital85,213
 80,727
86,639
 80,727
Treasury stock, at cost; 191,276 shares at July 1, 2017 and 161,185 shares at December 31, 2016(6,974) (6,430)
Treasury stock, at cost; 195,214 shares at September 30, 2017 and 161,185 shares at December 31, 2016(6,995) (6,430)
Retained earnings217,040
 365,463
130,890
 365,463
Total stockholders’ equity295,519
 439,996
210,776
 439,996
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$582,491
 $734,184
$519,010
 $734,184
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Net sales$304,837
 $332,717
 $621,738
 $669,491
$288,186
 $314,887
 $909,924
 $984,378
Cost of goods sold218,222
 224,893
 436,309
 445,420
202,062
 212,762
 638,371
 658,182
Gross profit86,615
 107,824
 185,429
 224,071
86,124
 102,125
 271,553
 326,196
Selling, general and administrative expenses86,779
 87,100
 169,984
 175,867
88,459
 81,655
 258,443
 257,522
Goodwill and store fixed-asset impairment charges168,090
 
 168,090
 218
Goodwill, tradename and store fixed-asset impairment charges106,000
 197
 274,090
 415
Income (loss) from operations(168,254) 20,724
 (152,645) 47,986
(108,335) 20,273
 (260,980) 68,259
Interest expense, net2,374
 2,352
 4,786
 4,614
2,426
 2,363
 7,212
 6,977
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(170,628) 18,372
 (157,431) 43,372
(110,761) 17,910
 (268,192) 61,282
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(14,209) 7,939
 (9,008) 18,157
(24,611) 6,547
 (33,619) 24,704
Net income (loss)$(156,419) $10,433
 $(148,423) $25,215
$(86,150) $11,363
 $(234,573) $36,578
Weighted average common shares outstanding              
Basic23,231,453
 23,763,934
 23,029,849
 24,283,135
23,152,645
 23,578,334
 23,070,781
 24,048,201
Diluted23,231,453
 23,938,978
 23,029,849
 24,474,018
23,152,645
 23,769,726
 23,070,781
 24,239,254
Net income (loss) per common share              
Basic$(6.73) $0.44
 $(6.44) $1.04
$(3.72) $0.48
 $(10.17) $1.52
Diluted$(6.73) $0.44
 $(6.44) $1.03
$(3.72) $0.48
 $(10.17) $1.51
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Net income (loss)$(156,419) $10,433
 $(148,423) $25,215
$(86,150) $11,363
 $(234,573) $36,578
Other comprehensive income:              
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 149
 
 60

 
 
 60
Other comprehensive income
 149
 
 60

 
 
 60
Comprehensive income (loss)$(156,419) $10,582
 $(148,423) $25,275
$(86,150) $11,363
 $(234,573) $36,638
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months EndedNine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net income (loss)$(148,423) $25,215
$(234,573) $36,578
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets15,839
 19,440
23,548
 28,812
Impairment charge on goodwill164,325
 
210,633
 
Impairment charge on tradename59,405
 
Impairment charges on fixed assets5,585
 218
5,872
 415
Amortization of deferred financing fees458
 472
678
 708
Amortization of debt discount on convertible notes2,368
 2,278
3,569
 3,434
Deferred income taxes(11,225) 1,899
(33,727) 1,309
Deferred rent(1,465) (1,546)(1,903) (2,340)
Equity compensation expense2,710
 3,534
4,137
 4,706
Issuance of shares for services rendered
 333

 333
Tax benefits on exercises of equity awards747
 577
895
 714
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Accounts receivable4,409
 2,056
4,445
 479
Inventories12,852
 (2,538)1,759
 4,506
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(2,886) (5,441)(6,056) (4,407)
Other long-term assets25
 81
50
 106
Accounts payable(9,109) 16,879
(287) 11,337
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities1,343
 (9,077)3,589
 (9,442)
Other long-term liabilities521
 561
939
 840
Net cash provided by operating activities38,074
 54,941
42,973
 78,088
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Capital expenditures(28,378) (21,005)(43,314) (31,228)
Trademarks and other intangible assets(156) (171)(313) (221)
Net cash used in investing activities(28,534) (21,176)(43,627) (31,449)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Borrowings under revolving credit facility57,000
 35,000
90,000
 51,000
Repayments of borrowings under revolving credit facility(65,000) (28,000)(89,000) (53,000)
Bank overdraft(3,052) (1,663)(1,841) (377)
Proceeds from exercises of common stock options1,511
 7
1,511
 90
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan270
 342
270
 536
Tax benefits on exercises of equity awards
 (577)
 (714)
Purchases of treasury stock(544) (974)(565) (1,175)
Purchases of shares under Share Repurchase Programs
 (51,011)
 (56,011)
Other financing activities(566) (54)(681) (125)
Net cash used in financing activities(10,381) (46,930)(306) (59,776)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents11
 53
31
 56
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(830) (13,112)(929) (13,081)
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period2,833
 15,104
2,833
 15,104
Cash and cash equivalents end of period$2,003
 $1,992

Cash and cash equivalents end of period$1,904
 $2,023
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:      
Interest paid$1,934
 $1,738
$2,110
 $1,879
Income taxes paid$6,588
 $21,661
$6,550
 $30,968
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities:      
Liability for purchases of property and equipment$10,017
 $5,774
$8,577
 $4,327
Assets acquired under capital leases$891
 $
$891
 $1,589
Assets acquired under tenant incentives$2,986
 $
$2,986
 $
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (“VSI”), is incorporated in the State of Delaware, and through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. (“Subsidiary” or “Industries” together with VSI, the “Company”), is an omni-channel specialty retailer and contract manufacturer of nutritional products. Sales of both national brands and our own brands of vitamins, minerals, herbs, specialty supplements, sports nutrition and other health and wellness products (“VMS products”) are made through VSI-operated retail stores and the internet to customers located primarily in the United States. The Company manufactures products for the VSI product assortment as well as sales to third parties.
The consolidated financial statements as of July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 are unaudited. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 was derived from our audited financial statements. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation in conformity with GAAP. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2017 (the “Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K”). The results of operations for the interim periods should not be considered indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
The Company's fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. As used herein, the term "Fiscal Year" or "Fiscal" refers to a 52-week or 53-week period, ending on the last Saturday in December. Fiscal 2016 was a 53-week fiscal year. The results for the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 are each based on 13-week and 26-week39-week periods, respectively.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Except as noted below, the Company has considered all new accounting pronouncements and has concluded that there are no new pronouncements that may have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, based on current information.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Under ASU 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public companies and early adoption of ASU 2014-09 is permitted for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Based on its preliminary evaluationThe Company is still in the process of ASU 2014-09 andcompleting its assessment of each performance obligation, such as the customer loyalty program and customer incentives, contract assets and contract liabilities, and the related disclosure requirements,requirements. Based on the preliminary assessment which is anticipated to be complete by fiscal year end, the Company currently expectsdoes not expect this guidance will not have a material impact onto the Company's consolidated financial statements andstatements. The Company expects to useapply the modified retrospective method for the transition to ASU 2014-09.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 was issued by the FASB to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The main difference between previous GAAP and Topic 842 is the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. ASU 2016-02 will require modified retrospective application at the beginning of our first quarter of Fiscal 2019, but permits adoption in an earlier period. TheAlthough the Company is still evaluating ASU 2016-02, the Company currently expects this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company'sits results of operations. However, the Company is still evaluating ASU 2016-02 in order to determine the impact of this guidance on the Company's balance sheet and anticipatesoperations, however, this guidance will result in a significant increase to long-term assets and liabilities on the Company's balance sheet given the Company has a significant number of leases. The Company is also in the process of evaluating software providers and identifying changes to its business processes, systems and controls to support the adoption of ASU 2016-02 in Fiscal 2019.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 addresses

simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 prospectively in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. All excess tax benefits and deficiencies in the current and future periods will be recognized in income tax expense in the Company's consolidated statements of operations in the reporting period in which they occur. This will result in increased volatility in the Company's effective tax rate. For the three and sixnine month periods ended July 1,September 30, 2017, the Company recognized discrete tax expense related to the excess tax deficiencies from stock-based compensation of $0.8$0.2 million and $0.7$0.9 million, respectively.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”), Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350). Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which that carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption of ASU 2017-04 is permittedThe Company elected to early adopt this guidance for interim orand annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company has elected early adoption of ASU 2017-04 for its interim goodwill impairment testing which occurred during its fiscal second quarter of 2017.
2. Inventories
The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Finished goods$217,970
 $222,046
$233,359
 $222,046
Work-in-process5,715
 7,566
5,842
 7,566
Raw materials9,630
 12,124
8,012
 12,124
$233,315
 $241,736
$247,213
 $241,736
3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is allocated between the Company’s segments (reporting units), retail and manufacturing. The following table discloses the carrying value of all intangible assets (in thousands):
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairment Charges (1) Net 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairment Charges (1) Net
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairment Charges (1) Net 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairment Charges (1) Net
Intangible assets                              
Goodwill$243,269
 $
 $196,961
 $46,308
 $243,269
 $
 $32,636
 $210,633
$243,269
 $
 $243,269
 $
 $243,269
 $
 $32,636
 $210,633
Tradenames – Indefinite-lived68,405
 
 
 68,405
 68,405
 
 
 68,405
68,405
 
 59,405
 9,000
 68,405
 
 
 68,405
Brands10,000
 1,713
 
 8,287
 10,000
 1,435
 
 8,565
10,000
 1,852
 
 8,148
 10,000
 1,435
 
 8,565
Customer relationships7,500
 906
 6,594
 
 7,500
 906
 6,594
 
7,500
 906
 6,594
 
 7,500
 906
 6,594
 
Tradenames – Definite-lived5,120
 3,206
 
 1,914
 4,964
 3,073
 
 1,891
5,277
 3,279
 
 1,998
 4,964
 3,073
 
 1,891
Software1,300
 802
 
 498
 1,300
 672
 
 628
1,300
 867
 
 433
 1,300
 672
 
 628
$335,594
 $6,627
 $203,555
 $125,412
 $335,438
 $6,086
 $39,230
 $290,122
$335,751
 $6,904
 $309,268
 $19,579
 $335,438
 $6,086
 $39,230
 $290,122
(1)During the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company experienced another significant reduction to its market capitalization. As a result, of the changed market conditions and the Company's updated initiatives for this year, the Company hasconcluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore interim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The Company also had

recently updated its long-range plan. The results of the interim goodwill and other intangible assets impairment tests indicated that the carrying value of the Vitamin Shoppe tradename exceeded its fair value and that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value. The Company recorded an impairment charge on the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $59.4 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. The Company also recorded an impairment charge for the remaining goodwill of its retail segment of $46.3 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company had experienced a significant reduction to its market capitalization. Additionally, as a result of changed market conditions and the Company's updated initiatives for the second half of Fiscal 2017, the Company revised the outlook for Fiscal 2017 and has updated its long-range plan to reflect its operations in this increasingly competitive environment. Additionally during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company experienced a

significant reduction to its market capitalization. Based on these factors, the Company concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore interim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The results of the interim goodwill impairment test indicated that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value, and in accordance with the early adoption of ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, the Company recorded an impairment charge on the goodwill of its retail segment of $164.3 million during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, of which $130.9 million is not deductible for income tax purposes.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, the Company recorded impairment charges on goodwill of $32.6 million and on the customer relationships intangible asset of the manufacturing segment of $6.6 million. No other intangible asset impairments
Total goodwill impairment charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were recorded$210.6 million, of which $177.2 million is not deductible for income tax purposes, as reflected in Fiscalthe effective tax rate benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of 12.5%. In addition, the tradename impairment charge of $59.4 million and the tax deductible portion of the goodwill impairment charges of $33.4 million resulted in an increase to the Company's net deferred tax assets of $35.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
TheFor indefinite-lived tradenames, the Company utilizes the royalty relief method in its quantitative evaluations. Under the royalty relief method, a royalty rate is determined based on comparable licensing arrangements which is applied to the revenue projections for the applicable indefinite-lived tradename and the fair value is calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis. Cash flows are discounted using an internally derived weighted average cost of capital which reflects the costs of borrowing as well as the associated risk.
For goodwill, the Company's quantitative impairment tests involve calculating the fair value of each reporting unit using the discounted cash flow analysis method along with the market multiples method which is used for additional validation of the fair value calculated. These valuation methods require certain assumptions and estimates be made by the Company regarding certain industry trends and future profitability. It is the Company's policy to conduct goodwill impairment testing from information based on current business projections, which include projected future revenues and cash flows. The cash flows utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis are based on five-year financial forecasts developed internally by management. Cash flows for each reporting unit are discounted using an internally derived weighted average cost of capital which reflects the costs of borrowing for the funding of each unit as well as the risk associated with the units themselves.
For indefinite-lived tradenames, the Company utilizes the royalty relief method in its quantitative evaluations. Under the royalty relief method, a royalty rate is determined based on comparable licensing arrangements which is applied to the revenue projections for the applicable indefinite-lived tradename and the fair value is calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis.
These measures of fair value for intangibles, and related inputs, are considered Level 3 measures under the fair value hierarchy.

The useful lives of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are between 5 to 18 years. The expected amortization expense on definite-lived intangible assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at July 1,September 30, 2017, is as follows (in thousands):
 
  
Remainder of Fiscal 2017$540
$270
Fiscal 20181,083
1,099
Fiscal 2019930
947
Fiscal 2020823
839
Fiscal 2021823
839
Thereafter6,500
6,585
$10,699
$10,579


4. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Accrued salaries and related expenses$15,358
 $13,861
$12,552
 $13,861
Accrued fixed asset additions8,867
 4,067
8,198
 4,067
Sales tax payable and related expenses6,517
 7,669
7,292
 7,669
Deferred sales6,271
 5,209
5,353
 5,209
Other accrued expenses26,979
 26,693
32,113
 26,693
$63,992
 $57,499
$65,508
 $57,499
 


5. Credit Arrangements

Convertible Senior Notes due 2020

On December 9, 2015, VSI issued $143.8 million of its 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of VSI. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on June 1, 2016 until their maturity date of December 1, 2020. The Company may not redeem the Convertible Notes prior to the maturity date.
Prior to July 1, 2020, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only under certain circumstances. The Convertible Notes will beare convertible at an initial conversion rate of 25.1625 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initiala conversion price of approximately $39.74. The conversion rate will beis subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, the Company is required to increase, in certain circumstances, the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such a corporate event including customary conversion rate adjustments in connection with a “make-whole fundamental change” as defined. Upon conversion, the Company may satisfy its conversion obligation by paying or delivering, as applicable, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, at its election.
The Company allocated the principal amount of the Convertible Notes between its liability and equity components (see table below). The carrying amount of the liability component was determined by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument of similar credit quality and maturity that did not have the conversion feature. The carrying amount of the equity component, representing the embedded conversion option, was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the Convertible Notes as a whole. The equity component was recorded to additional paid-in capital and is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. The excess of the

principal amount of the Convertible Notes over the carrying amount of the liability component was recorded as a debt discount, and is being amortized to interest expense using an effective interest rate of 3.8% over the term of the Convertible Notes. The Company allocated the total amount of transaction costs incurred to the liability and equity components using the same proportions as the proceeds from the Convertible Notes. Transaction costs attributable to the liability component were recorded as a direct deduction from the liability component of the Convertible Notes, and are being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method through the maturity date. Transaction costs attributable to the equity component were netted with the equity component of the Convertible Notes in additional paid-in capital.
The Convertible Notes consist of the following components (in thousands):
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Liability component:      
Principal$143,750
 $143,750
$143,750
 $143,750
Conversion feature(24,800) (24,800)(24,800) (24,800)
Liability portion of debt issuance costs(3,802) (3,802)(3,802) (3,802)
Amortization8,474
 5,726
9,865
 5,726
Net carrying amount$123,622
 $120,874
$125,013
 $120,874
      
Equity component:      
Conversion feature$24,800
 $24,800
$24,800
 $24,800
Equity portion of debt issuance costs(793) (793)(793) (793)
Deferred taxes941
 941
941
 941
Net carrying amount$24,948
 $24,948
$24,948
 $24,948
      
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note hedge transactions for which it paid an aggregate $26.4 million. In addition, the Company sold warrants for which it received aggregate proceeds of $13.0 million. The convertible note hedge transactions are expected generally to reduce potential dilution of the Company’s common stock upon any conversion of notes and/or offset any cash payments the Company is required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted notes. However, the warrant transaction could separately have

a dilutive effect to the extent that the market value per share of the Company’s common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrant transactions, which is approximately $52.99 at inception. As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria, the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions are recorded in stockholders’ equity, are not accounted for as derivatives and are not remeasured each reporting period.
The net proceeds from the Convertible Notes and related transactions of $125.7 million, net of commissions and offering costs of $4.6 million, were used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock under the Company’s share repurchase programs.
Revolving Credit Facility
As of July 1,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $3.0$12.0 million and $11.0 million of borrowings outstanding on its Revolving Credit Facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"), respectively.
In May 2017, the Company executed an amendment to its Revolving Credit Facility, which provides for an extension of the maturity date to May 9, 2022, provided that the maturity date would be any day on or after September 2, 2020 only if the Company did not on any such day have enough liquidity to retire its Convertible Notes then outstanding, if any. The amendment also provides for a reduction of the interest rate under the Revolving Credit Facility, as noted below.
Subject to the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company may borrow up to $90.0 million, with a Company option to increase the facility up to a total of $150.0 million. The availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base calculated on the value of certain accounts receivable as well as certain inventory of the Company. The obligations thereunder are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company. Under the Revolving Credit Facility, VSI has guaranteed the Company’s obligations, and Industries and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have each guaranteed the obligations of the other respective entities. The Revolving Credit Facility provides for affirmative and negative

covenants affecting the Company. The Revolving Credit Facility restricts, among other things, the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness, create or permit liens on the Company’s assets, declare or pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments, consolidate, merge or recapitalize, sell assets, make certain investments, loans or other advances, enter into transactions with affiliates, change our line of business, and restricts the types of hedging activities the Company can enter into. The largest amount borrowed during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was $38.0 million and $21.0$27.0 million, respectively. The unused available line of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility at July 1,September 30, 2017 was $84.0$75.2 million.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at the rate per annum based on an “alternative base rate” plus 0.00%, 0.125% or 0.25% or the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%, 1.125% or 1.25%, in each case with the highest spread applicable in the event that the average excess collateral availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is less than 33% of the borrowing base availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, the second highest spread applicable in the event that the average excess collateral availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is less than 66% and greater than or equal to 33% of the borrowing base availability under the Revolving Credit Facility and the lowest spread applicable in the event that the average excess collateral availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is greater than or equal to 66% of the borrowing base availability under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate for the Revolving Credit Facility during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was 2.13%2.18% and 1.74%1.75%, respectively. The commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the $90.0 million Revolving Credit Facility is 0.25%. per annum.
Interest expense, net for the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 consists of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Amortization of debt discount on Convertible Notes$1,190
 $1,144
 $2,368
 $2,278
$1,201
 $1,156
 $3,569
 $3,434
Interest on Convertible Notes817
 833
 1,635
 1,637
818
 818
 2,453
 2,455
Amortization of deferred financing fees220
 235
 458
 472
220
 236
 678
 708
Interest / fees on the Revolving Credit Facility and other interest147
 140
 325
 227
187
 153
 512
 380
Interest expense, net$2,374
 $2,352
 $4,786
 $4,614
$2,426
 $2,363
 $7,212
 $6,977

6. Stock Based Compensation
Equity Incentive Plans – The Company has two equity incentive plans that provide stock based compensation to certain directors, officers, consultants and employees of the Company;Company: the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the Vitamin Shoppe 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective April 6, 2012 (the “2009 Plan”). As of July 1,September 30, 2017, there were 1,623,1751,517,878 shares available to grant under both plans which includes 191,276195,214 shares currently held by the Company as treasury stock.
The following table summarizes restricted shares for the 2009 Plan as of July 1,September 30, 2017 and changes during the sixnine month period then ended:
Number of Unvested
Restricted Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Number of Unvested
Restricted Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2016372,817
 $35.20
372,817
 $35.20
Granted356,508
 $18.98
577,183
 $14.04
Vested(76,002) $43.36
(86,607) $42.49
Canceled/forfeited(55,306) $28.72
(124,781) $27.36
Unvested at July 1, 2017598,017
 $25.09
Unvested at September 30, 2017738,612
 $19.13
The total intrinsic value of restricted shares vested during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was $1.4 million and $2.5$2.7 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock options for the 2006 Plan and 2009 PlansPlan as of July 1,September 30, 2017 and changes during the sixnine month period then ended:
Number
of Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Number
of Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2016502,797
 $25.30
 
 
502,797
 $25.30
 
 
Granted
 $
 
 

 $
 
 
Exercised(100,000) $15.11
 
 
(100,000) $15.11
 
 
Canceled/forfeited(50,549) $28.69
 
 
(88,605) $27.93
 
 
Outstanding at July 1, 2017352,248
 $27.70
 5.99 $
Vested or expected to vest at July 1, 2017341,720
 $27.70
 5.99 
Vested and exercisable at July 1, 2017202,142
 $26.98
 3.88 $
Outstanding at September 30, 2017314,192
 $27.79
 6.02 $
Vested or expected to vest at September 30, 2017304,772
 $27.79
 6.02 
Vested and exercisable at September 30, 2017175,167
 $27.17
 3.97 $
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 was $0.7 million and during the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016 was de minimis.$0.1 million. The cash received from options exercised during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 was $1.5 million and during the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016 was de minimis.$0.1 million.
Stock options were not granted during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017. The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options during the three and sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016 was $7.89$7.07 and $8.29,$8.21, respectively. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
June 25, 2016 June 25, 2016September 24, 2016 September 24, 2016
Expected dividend yield0.0% 0.0%0.0% 0.0%
Weighted average expected volatility31.8% 32.6%31.4% 32.5%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate1.1% 1.2%1.0% 1.2%
Expected holding period4.00 years
 4.00 years
4.00 years
 4.00 years
The following table summarizes performance share units for the 2009 Plan as of July 1,September 30, 2017 and changes during the sixnine month period then ended:
Number of Unvested
Performance Share
Units
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Number of Unvested
Performance Share
Units
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2016125,015
 $30.43
125,015
 $30.43
Granted241,485
 $19.10
241,485
 $19.10
Vested
 $

 $
Canceled/forfeited(21,288) $27.17
(78,135) $24.94
Unvested at July 1, 2017345,212
 $22.71
Unvested at September 30, 2017288,365
 $22.43
Performance share units granted during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 shall become vestedvest on December 28, 2019 if the performance criteria are achieved. Performance share units can vest at a range of 25% to 150% based on the achievement of pre-established performance targets.

The following table summarizes restricted share units for the 2009 Plan as of July 1,September 30, 2017 and changes during the sixnine month period then ended:
Number of Unvested
Restricted Share
Units
 Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Number of Unvested
Restricted Share
Units
 Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 201615,390
 $30.71
15,390
 $30.71
Granted1,140
 $18.75
54,078
 $12.04
Vested(16,530) $29.89
(16,530) $29.89
Canceled/forfeited
 $

 $
Unvested at July 1, 2017
 $
Unvested at September 30, 201752,938
 $11.90
The total intrinsic value of restricted share units vested during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was $0.2$0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Compensation expense attributable to stock based compensation for the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 was approximately $1.1$1.4 million and $2.7$4.1 million, respectively, and for the three and sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016 was approximately $1.8$1.2 million and $3.5$4.7 million, respectively. As of July 1,September 30, 2017, the remaining unrecognized stock based compensation expense for non-vested stock options, restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units to be expensed in future periods is $8.7$8.4 million, and the related weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized is 1.91.7 years. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company estimates forfeitures based on its historical forfeiture rate since the inception of granting stock based awards. The estimated value of future forfeitures for stock options, restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units as of July 1,September 30, 2017 is approximately $0.8 million.
Treasury Stock – As part of the Company’s equity incentive plans, the Company makes required tax payments on behalf of employees as their restricted shares vest. The Company withholds the number of vested shares having a value on the date of vesting equal to the minimum statutory tax obligation. The shares withheld are recorded as treasury shares. During the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017, the Company purchased 30,09134,029 shares in settlement of employees’ tax obligations for a total of

$0.5 $0.6 million. The Company accounts for treasury stock using the cost method. These shares are available to grant under the Company’s equity incentive plans.
7. Restructuring Costs
Nutri-Force Restructuring
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company engaged outside consultants to perform an assessment of the operations of Nutri-Force and to assist in the development of initiatives required to improve the performance of this business. The initiatives identified are focused on improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes, eliminating unprofitable SKUs, reducing third party sales, and reducing costs. The implementation of this plan began during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017 and is expected to be substantially completed in Fiscal 2017.
Costs incurred for the restructuring of Nutri-Force during the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 July 1, 2017September 30, 2017 September 30, 2017
Inventory obsolescence charges$8,875
 $8,875
$(164) $8,711
Equipment impairment charges1,820
 1,820

 1,820
Accounts receivable allowance charges1,343
 1,343
(118) 1,225
Outside consulting fees1,288
 1,717
1,430
 3,147
Severance and other expenses329
 571
528
 1,099
$13,655
 $14,326
$1,676
 $16,002


The inventory and equipment impairment charges are included in cost of goods sold and the accounts receivable allowance charges, outside consulting fees and severance and other expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company expects to incur restructuring costs in the range of $16.0 million to $20.0approximately $17.0 million during Fiscal 2017 related to the turnaround of Nutri-Force.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company's liabilities for the restructuring liabilitiesof Nutri-Force (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2016$
$
Outside consulting fees expense1,717
3,147
Severance and other expense571
1,099
Outside consulting fees payments(1,717)(3,147)
Severance and other payments(351)(628)
Balance as of July 1, 2017$220
Balance as of September 30, 2017$471
Closing of Distribution Center
In August 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration. Distribution operations will be transitioned to the Company's other distribution centers. Such transition is expected to be substantially completed by the end of fiscal year 2017. Costs related to this closure, such as severance, inventory related costs and other charges, are estimated to be approximately $4.0 million.
Costs incurred related to the closing of the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2017
Inventory obsolescence charges$2,000
 $2,000
Acceleration of depreciation233
 233
Severance and other expenses (1)24
 24
 $2,257
 $2,257
(1)As of September 30, 2017, there have been no payments of severance and other expenses related to the closing of the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center.
The inventory impairment charges are included in cost of goods sold and the severance and other expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
8. Advertising Costs
The costs of advertising for online marketing arrangements, direct mail, magazines and radio are expensed as incurred, or the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising expense was $7.0$8.7 million and $6.3$5.7 million for the three months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016, respectively, and $12.9$21.6 million and $12.4$18.1 million for the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016, respectively.
9. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company’s basic net income (loss) per share excludes the dilutive effect of stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested performance share units and unvested restricted share units. It is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period divided into net income (loss).
Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested

performance share units, unvested restricted share units and warrants are included as potential dilutive securities for the periods applicable, using the treasury stock method to the extent dilutive.

The components of the calculation of basic net income (loss) per common share and diluted net income (loss) per common share are as follows (in thousands except share and per share data):
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Numerator:              
Net income (loss)$(156,419) $10,433
 $(148,423) $25,215
$(86,150) $11,363
 $(234,573) $36,578
Denominator:              
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding23,231,453
 23,763,934
 23,029,849
 24,283,135
23,152,645
 23,578,334
 23,070,781
 24,048,201
Effect of dilutive securities (a):              
Stock options
 71,341
 
 72,356

 67,797
 
 70,837
Restricted shares
 97,167
 
 114,892

 110,761
 
 113,515
Performance share units
 5,086
 
 2,627

 11,602
 
 5,619
Restricted share units
 1,450
 
 1,008

 1,232
 
 1,082
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding23,231,453
 23,938,978
 23,029,849
 24,474,018
23,152,645
 23,769,726
 23,070,781
 24,239,254
Basic net income (loss) per common share$(6.73) $0.44
 $(6.44) $1.04
$(3.72) $0.48
 $(10.17) $1.52
Diluted net income (loss) per common share$(6.73) $0.44
 $(6.44) $1.03
$(3.72) $0.48
 $(10.17) $1.51
(a) For the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017, due to a loss for the period, zerono incremental shares are included because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Securities for the three months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and September 24, 2016 in the amount of 791,633829,080 shares and 35,106 shares, respectively, have been excluded from the above calculation as they were anti-dilutive. No securities have been excluded from the above calculation for the three months ended June 25, 2016. Securities for the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 in the amount of 418,600555,427 shares and 5,08015,088 shares, respectively, have been excluded from the above calculation as they were anti-dilutive.
The Company has the intent and ability to settle the principal portion of its Convertible Notes in cash, and as such, has applied the treasury stock method, which has resulted in the underlying convertible shares, and related warrants, being anti-dilutive for the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 as the Company’s average stock price from the date of issuance of the Convertible Notes through July 1,September 30, 2017 was less than the conversion price as well as less than the strike price of the warrant transaction. Refer to Note 5. Credit Arrangements for additional information on the Convertible Notes.
10. Share Repurchase Programs
Beginning on August 5, 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved share repurchase programs that enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $370 million of its shares of common stock and / or its Convertible Notes, from time to time. As of July 1,September 30, 2017, 8,064,325 shares of common stock pursuant to these programs, and no Convertible Notes, have been repurchased for a total of $269.9 million. There is approximately $100.1 million remaining in this program which expires on November 22, 2018.
The repurchase programs do not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of securities and may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing securities, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, restrictions under the Company's credit agreement, applicable law and other factors deemed appropriate.
No shares or other securities of the Company were repurchased under these programs during the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017. During the three and sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016, the Company repurchased 304,943179,648 and 1,739,4841,919,132 shares, respectively, which were retired upon repurchase. The total purchase price during the three and sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016 was $8.7$5.0 million and $51.0$56.0 million, respectively, with an average repurchase price per share of $28.54$27.83 and $29.33,$29.19, respectively.

11. Legal Proceedings

The Company is party to various lawsuits arising from time to time in the normal course of business, some of which are covered by insurance. Although the impact of the final resolution of these matters on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
In addition, on or about August 22, 2017, a federal securities class action suit was filed in the United States District Court in the District of New Jersey against Vitamin Shoppe and certain officers and directors on behalf of purchasers of Vitamin Shoppe common stock between March 1, 2017 and August 6, 2017, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 alleging that the defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the purported then-ongoing improvements being achieved, the Company’s profitability trends, and its financial results. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we are vigorously defending the lawsuit.
12. Segment Data
In conjunction with the Company’s reinvention, we have increased our focus on customer centric initiatives and being an omni-channel based retailer. As recently launched initiatives, including buy online pickup in store and auto-delivery subscription sales, continue to develop, the interrelationship among the ways customers can purchase products from VSI results in sales that are generated and fulfilled across multiple channels. The Company has revised its internal management structure and reporting to align with our omni-channel strategy. The Company believes the historical structure of separate segments for retail stores and e-commerce is no longer representative of the way the business is managed. As a result, beginning in Fiscal 2017, the Company has updated its segment reporting to better align with its omni-channel strategy. These changes include combining the formerresulted in a single retail segment that includes fulfilled in store and direct operating segments into one retail operating segment.to consumer sales channels. In addition, certain costs previously classified as corporate costs, such as retail and direct management costs, are now allocated to the retail operating segment. Segment results related to prior periods have been revised to conform with this omni-channel structure. VSI has revised its internal management structure and reporting to align with our omni-channel strategy.
Based upon the revised structure of the Company, there are two reporting segments, retail and manufacturing. The reporting segments have separate financial information available for which operating results are evaluated regularly by executive management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company's management evaluates segment operating results based on several indicators. The primary key performance indicators are sales and operating income for each segment. The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those described in Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K, and the table below represents key financial information for each of the Company's business segments as well as corporate costs.
The retail segment includes the Company's retail stores and websites. The retail segment generates revenue through the sale of VMS products through Vitamin Shoppe and Super Supplements retail stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, and the Company's websites offer customers online access to a full assortment of approximately 17,000 SKUs. The manufacturing segment supplies the retail segment, along with various third parties, with finished products for sale. Corporate costs represent all other expenses not allocated to the retail or manufacturing segments which include, but are not limited to: human resources, legal, finance, information technology, and various other corporate level activity related expenses.
The Company has allocated $46.3 million of its recorded goodwill to the retail segment. The Company does not have identifiable assets separated between its retail segment assets and corporate assets. The identifiable assets of the manufacturing segment were $59.9$57.4 million and $62.3 million as of July 1,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Capital expenditures for the manufacturing segment for the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 were approximately $0.9$1.1 million and $1.1$1.9 million, respectively. At July 1,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, long lived assets of the manufacturing segment were $17.6$17.1 million and $20.1 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for the manufacturing segment during the three months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.4$0.5 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for the manufacturing segment during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was approximately $0.6$0.8 million and $0.8$1.4 million, respectively.

The following table contains key financial information of the Company’s reporting segments (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016* July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016*September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016* September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016*
Net sales:              
Retail$296,419
 $321,063
 $602,191
 $644,927
$282,408
 $301,077
 $884,599
 $946,004
Manufacturing23,349
 20,778
 45,014
 41,338
20,872
 24,357
 65,886
 65,695
Segment net sales319,768
 341,841
 647,205
 686,265
303,280
 325,434
 950,485
 1,011,699
Elimination of intersegment revenues(14,931) (9,124) (25,467) (16,774)(15,094) (10,547) (40,561) (27,321)
Net sales$304,837
 $332,717
 $621,738
 $669,491
$288,186
 $314,887
 $909,924
 $984,378
Income (loss) from operations:              
Retail$24,402
 $37,356
 $58,427
 $82,107
$16,104
 $34,344
 $74,531
 $116,451
Manufacturing(15,881) (1,822) (19,113) (2,084)(4,530) (734) (23,643) (2,818)
Corporate costs(176,775) (14,810) (191,959) (32,037)(119,909) (13,337) (311,868) (45,374)
Income (loss) from operations (1)$(168,254) $20,724
 $(152,645) $47,986
$(108,335) $20,273
 $(260,980) $68,259
* Prior year periods have been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(1) Income (loss) from operations includes (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016
Goodwill impairment (a)$164,325
 $
 $164,325
 $
Nutri-Force turnaround costs (b)13,655
 
 14,326
 
Store impairment charges (c)3,765
 
 3,765
 218
Canada stores closing costs (d)
 1,864
 
 2,795
Cost reduction project (e)
 1,492
 
 1,492
Super Supplements conversion costs (f)
 
 
 1,046
Reinvention strategy costs (g)
 
 
 541
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Goodwill impairments (a)$46,308
 $
 $210,633
 $
Tradename impairment (b)59,405
 
 59,405
 
Nutri-Force turnaround costs (c)1,676
 
 16,002
 
Store impairment charges (d)287
 197
 4,052
 415
Distribution center closing costs (e)2,257
 
 2,257
 
Cost reduction project (f)
 2,269
 
 3,761
Canada stores closing costs (g)
 (906) 
 1,889
Super Supplements conversion costs (h)
 
 
 1,046
Reinvention strategy costs (i)
 
 
 541

(a)Impairment chargecharges on the goodwill of the retail segment.
(b)Impairment charge on the Vitamin Shoppe tradename.
(c)The costs represent restructuring costs in the manufacturing segment. See Note 7., Restructuring Costs for additional information.
(c)(d)Impairment charges on the fixed assets of retail locations still in use in the Company's operations.
(d)(e)Costs primarily include lease termination charges includedThe costs represent restructuring costs in the retail segment and corporate costs.segment. See Note 7., Restructuring Costs for additional information.
(e)(f)Outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities included in corporate costs.
(f)(g)Costs primarily include lease termination charges included in the retail segment and corporate costs. The credit during the three months ended September 24, 2016 relates to a reversal of lease liabilities previously accrued.
(h)Costs primarily related to the closure of the Seattle distribution center included in the retail segment and corporate costs.
(g)(i)The costs represent outside consultants fees in connection with the Company's "reinvention strategy" included in corporate costs.
13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value hierarchy requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the

assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or

liability.
The Company’s financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and its Revolving Credit Facility. The Company believes that the recorded values of these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to their nature and respective durations.
The Company's financial instruments also include its Convertible Notes (in thousands):
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Fair Value$113,879
 $132,677
$107,238
 $132,677
Carrying Value (1)123,622
 120,874
125,013
 120,874
      

(1) Represents the net carrying amount of the liability component of the Convertible Notes.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s 2016 consolidated financial statements, management determined that the allocation of fair value between the liability and equity portion of the Convertible Notes needed to be revised, and accordingly, the fair value previously reported as $111.6 million has been revised to $132.7 million as of December 31, 2016 in the table above.
The fair value of the Convertible Notes was determined based on inputs that are observable in the market or that could be derived from, or corroborated with, observable market data, including the trading price of the Company’s Convertible Notes, when available, the Company’s stock price and interest rates based on similar debt issued by parties with credit ratings similar to the Company (Level 1 or 2).
CertainGoodwill, indefinite-lived tradenames and store fixed assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the assets are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances such as when there is evidence of impairment. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered Level 2 or 3 measures under the fair value hierarchy.
14. Subsequent Event
On August 9, 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration. Distribution operations will be transitioned to the Company's other distribution centers, and will be substantially completed by the end of fiscal year 2017. Costs related to this closure, such as severance, inventory related costs and other charges, are estimated to be $4 million. As a result of this closure, the Company anticipates annualized savings between $4 million to $5 million upon lease expiration.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included as part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Company Overview
We are an omni-channel specialty retailer and contract manufacturer of vitamins, minerals, herbs, specialty supplements, sports nutrition and other health and wellness products. As of July 1,September 30, 2017, we operated 783784 stores in 45 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico and also sold our products directly to consumers through the internet, primarily at www.vitaminshoppe.com. We market approximately 900 nationally recognized brands as well as our own brands, which include The Vitamin Shoppe®, BodyTech®, True Athlete®, Mytrition®, plnt®, ProBioCare®, Next Step® and Betancourt Nutrition®. We believe we offer one of the largest varieties of products among vitamin, mineral and supplement (“VMS”) retailers and continue to refine our assortment with approximately 7,000 stock keeping units (“SKUs”) offered in our typical store and approximately 10,000 additional SKUs available through e-commerce. We believe our product offering and emphasis on product knowledge and customer service helps us meet the needs of our target customer and serves as a foundation for enhancing strong customer loyalty.
We continue to focus on our strategy to improve customers experience through the scaling of initiatives including increasing customer engagement and personalization, redesigning the omni-channel experience (including in stores as well as through the internet and mobile devices), growing our private brands and improving the effectiveness of pricing and promotions. As part of this strategy, we have developed several initiatives, including a new remodeled store format that is being

piloted in 1417 stores as of July 1,September 30, 2017, which includes a new layout, revised product assortment and other instore experiences (hereafter referred to as "transformations").
In recent quarters, competitive trends have intensified, such as broader channel availability of VMSsupplement products, more aggressive competitor pricing and promotional strategies, and significantly increased expenditures in marketing.marketing by our competitors. Our operations have been negatively impacted, resulting in lower customer traffic and a reduction in net sales during the first sixnine months of Fiscal 2017. Over the past sixnine months we have tested and subsequently launched several initiatives including new pricing and promotional strategies and a customer auto-delivery subscription program, which we are currently launchingprogram. We also increased our marketing expense beginning in the marketplace. We also plan to increase marketing expense for the balancethird quarter of the year.Fiscal 2017. We anticipate these initiatives will mitigate some of the negative performance we have experienced in areas such as customer traffic, and as a result of these changes and the competitive environment, we are revising our expectations on our results of operations for the balance of fiscal year 2017 and beyond.traffic.
While these various customer-focused initiatives are implemented, we continue to identify and implement opportunities to improve efficiencies and reduce costs in key areas including sourcing of inventory and cost savings opportunities related to selling, general and administrative expenses. For Fiscal 2017, the Company expects to realize incremental year over year cost of goods sold savings of approximately $12.0 million and selling, general and administrative expenses savings of approximately $4.0 million, for a total savings of $16.0 million.
Impairment of long-lived assets:
As a result ofDuring the changed market conditions and our updated initiatives for this year, we have revised the outlook for Fiscal 2017 and have updated a long-range plan to reflect our operations in this increasingly competitive environment. Additionally during the secondthird quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company experienced aanother significant reduction to its market capitalization. Based on these factors, weAs a result, the Company concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore aninterim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The Company also had recently updated its long-range plan. The results of the interim goodwill and other intangible assets impairment test wastests indicated that the carrying value of the Vitamin Shoppe tradename exceeded its fair value and that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value. The Company recorded an impairment charge on the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $59.4 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. The Company also recorded an impairment charge for the remaining goodwill of its retail segment of $46.3 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Should the financial performance of the retail reporting unit not meet or exceed current forecasts, or if the long-range plan is lowered, or if the rate used to discount cash flows is increased due to the associated risk, estimates of future cash flows may be insufficient to support the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $9.0 million as of September 30, 2017 and this may result in further impairment charges.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company had experienced a significant reduction to its market capitalization. Additionally, as a result of changed market conditions and the Company's updated initiatives for the second half of Fiscal 2017, the Company revised the outlook for Fiscal 2017 and updated its long-range plan to reflect its operations in this increasingly competitive environment. Based on these factors, the Company concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore interim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The results of the interim goodwill impairment test indicated that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value, and in accordance with the early adoption of ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, the Company recorded an impairment charge on the goodwill of its retail segment of $164.3 million during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, of which $130.9 million is not deductible for income tax purposes.
After the recognition of the goodwill impairment charge, the carrying value of the retail reporting unit is equal to its fair value. Should the financial performance of the retail reporting unit not meet or exceed current forecasts, or if the long-range plan is lowered, estimates of future cash flows may be insufficient to support the remaining carrying value of goodwill of $46.3 million assigned to the retail reporting unit as of July 1, 2017.
In addition, the Company recognized impairment charges of $3.8$0.3 million duringfor the second quarter of Fiscalthree months ended September 30, 2017 on fixed assets related to 24three of its underperforming retail locations still in use in the Company's operations. The Company recognized impairment charges of $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 on fixed assets related to 27 of its underperforming retail locations still in use in the Company's operations.
Manufacturing turnaround:
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 the Company recorded impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force, as our manufacturing operations continued to perform below expectations. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company engaged outside consultants to perform an assessment of the operations of Nutri-Force and to assist in the development of initiatives required to turnaround this business unit. These initiatives are focused on improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes, eliminating unprofitable SKUs, reducing third-party customers, and reducing costs. The implementation of this plan began during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017 and is expected to be substantially completed in Fiscal 2017. As a result, the Company expects to incur costs in the range of $16.0 million to $20.0approximately $17.0 million during Fiscal 2017 related to the turnaround of Nutri-Force such asincluding inventory charges, consulting expenses and other selling, general and administrative related charges, of which $13.7$1.7 million and $14.3$16.0 million of turnaround costs have been incurred during the three and sixnine month periods ended July 1,September 30, 2017, respectively. Additionally, operational results will

be impacted during the turnaround and we estimate Nutri-Force will generate anclose to breakeven operating loss of approximately $4.0 million to $5.0 millionincome in the remainder of Fiscal 2017, excluding the turnaround costs.

Closing of distribution center:
In August 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration. Distribution operations will be transitioned to the Company's other distribution centers, and will be substantially completed by the end of fiscal year 2017. Costs related to this closure, such as severance, inventory related costs and other charges, are estimated to be $4.0 million, of which $2.3 million of costs have been recorded during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017. As a result of this closure, the Company anticipates annualized savings between $4.0 million to $5.0 million upon lease expiration.
During the SecondThird Quarter of Fiscal 2017:
Total comparable net sales decreased 8.3%6.6%, down 5.8% excluding hurricane impact

Fully diluted loss per share of $6.73,$3.72 including impairment charges on long-lived assets of $168.1$106.0 million


Company launcheslaunched sales driving initiatives to improve competitiveness

Business unit restructuring to further reduce costs, including rationalization of supply chain network and continued restructuring at Nutri-Forcecustomer acquisition initiatives

Outlook for Fiscal 2017
Given the level of volatility in the market and the potential increase in variability of the Company’s results due to the number of initiatives being launched in the back half of the year, the Company has reset its 2017 outlook and is modifying its approach to guidance.  The Company is providing guidance around the key levers that drive the business instead of providing specific earnings per share guidance.business.
The Company expects full year comparable sales decline rate of negative mid-single digits

7%, which includes the impact from hurricanes.
Reported full year gross margin rate of 30.2%29.5% to 30.7%29.8%, including charges associated with the Nutri-Force restructuring and the closure of the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center.

Reported full year SG&A expense of $342$344 million to $347$346 million, including charges associated with the Nutri-Force restructuringrestructuring.

CapitalFull year capital expenditures of approximately $45$50 million, including build out of the distribution center in Arizona, IT investments, approximately 15 new stores, and 10-15 brand defining store transformations

and corporate office expansion in Secaucus, New Jersey to support closure of offices in North Bergen, New Jersey.
Segment Information
In conjunction with the Company’s reinvention, we have increased our focus on customer centric initiatives and being an omni-channel retailer. As recently launched initiatives, including buy online pickup in store and subscription sales, continue to develop, the interrelationship among the ways customers can purchase products from the Company results in sales that are generated and fulfilled across multiple channels. The Company has revised its internal management structure and reporting to align with our omni-channel strategy. We believe the historical structure of separate segments for retail stores and e-commerce is no longer representative of the way the business is managed. As a result, beginning in Fiscal 2017, the Company has updated its segment reporting to better align with its omni-channel strategy. These changes include combining the formerresulted in a single retail segment that includes fulfilled in store and direct operating segments into one retail operating segment.to consumer sales channels. In addition, certain costs previously classified as corporate costs, such as retail and direct management costs, are allocated to the retail operating segment. Segment results related to prior periods have been restated to conform with this omni-channel structure. The Company has revised its internal management structure and reporting to align with our omni-channel strategy.
Based upon the revised structure of the Company, we operate through two business segments: retail, which includes Vitamin Shoppe and Super Supplements retail store formats and our e-commerce formats, and manufacturing, which consists of the Nutri-Force manufacturing operations.
Retail. Through our retail store formats, we believe we differentiate ourselves in the VMS industry. What makes us unique is our broad selection of VMS products and our stores are staffed with trained and knowledgeable employees, who we refer to as Health Enthusiasts®, and who are able to inform our customers about product features and assist in product selection. We also sell our products directly to consumers through the internet, primarily at www.vitaminshoppe.com. Our e-commerce sites complement our in-store experience by extending our retail product offerings with approximately 10,000 additional SKUs that are not available in our stores and enable us to access customers outside our retail markets and those who prefer to shop online.

Manufacturing. Through Nutri-Force, we provide custom manufacturing and private labeling of VMS products and develop and market our own branded products for both the VSI product assortment and sales to third parties.
Trends and Other Factors Affecting Our Business
Our performance is affected by industry trends including, among others, demographic, health and lifestyle preferences, as well as other factors, such as industry media coverage and governmental actions. For example, our industry is subject to potential regulatory activity and other legal matters that could affect the credibility of a given product or category of products. Consumer trends, the overall impact on consumer spending, which may be affected heavily by current economic conditions, and limited product innovation and introductions in the VMS industry can dramatically affect purchasing patterns. Even though our business model allows us to respond to changing industry trends by introducing new products and adjusting our product mix and sales incentives, such actions may not offset adverse trends.

Additionally, our performance is affected by competitive trends such as the entry and expansion of competitors, changes in pricing and promotional strategies or expansion of product assortment by various competitors. Over recent years, there has been a shift of market share from specialty retailers to other channels such as mass market retailers, supermarket chains, club chains, drugstore chains and e-commerce companies. This broader competitive channel availability of VMS products represents a challenge for the Company to keep pace with industry growth rates. We also have observed more competition in our assortment, and more competitive pricing and promotional strategies by competitors and increased levels of marketing spending.
Our historical results have also been significantly influenced by our new store openings. Since the beginning of Fiscal 2014, we have opened 146149 stores and as of July 1,September 30, 2017 operate 783784 stores located in 45 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. NewAt this point we have significantly slowed new store growth has been lowered as the Company evaluates the performance of transformationswhile we complete an evaluation of our existingstore network strategy. In addition, we remain committed to innovation at the store level and we have been rolling out two key elements of new category innovation with our new Kombucha bar on tap and Fit Freezer / Cooler section to over 80 stores and may shift capital resources from new stores to transforming existing stores inby the future.end of the year.
New stores have typically required approximately four to five years to mature, generating lower store level sales in the initial years than our mature stores. As a result, new stores generally have a negative impact on our overall operating margin. In addition, our new stores since the beginning of Fiscal 2013 are approximately 2,900 square feet compared to the average of our total store portfolio of approximately 3,500 square feet. Additionally, stores opened in new markets have lower brand awareness compared to stores in existing markets, and as a result initially experience a lower sales volume than stores opened in existing markets. As these stores mature, we expect them to contribute positively to our operating results.
Beginning in Fiscal 2016, the Company implemented enhancements to its loyalty program, including the issuance of credit certificates on a quarterly basis compared with the annual issuances under the previous program. Under the enhanced loyalty program, the related benefits are spread on a quarterly basis throughout the fiscal year. As a result, in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, the related benefits of the quarterly program resulted in lower loyalty program related sales than the first quarter of Fiscal 2016 which were based on the annual cadence of the previous program.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company entered into an agreement to lease a warehousing and distribution facility in Avondale, Arizona, which we expect to open beforeopened in the endthird quarter of Fiscal 2017. We expect to incurincurred approximately $16.0 million to $17.0 million of capital expenditures related to the opening of this facility. We previously utilized a third-party logistics provider to service the west coast. We believe operating our own facility will provide improved service levels and network efficiencies.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our financial statements in the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K. A discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K. Management has discussed the development and selection of these policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed the disclosures relating to them. ManagementExcept as noted below, management believes there have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies or estimates reported in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K.
Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset
The Company's one indefinite-lived intangible asset is the Vitamin Shoppe tradename. On an annual basis, or whenever impairment indicators exist, we perform an evaluation of our indefinite-lived intangible asset. In the absence of any

impairment indicators, our indefinite-lived intangible asset is tested in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The evaluation of our indefinite-lived intangible asset may first consider qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. A quantitative evaluation is performed if the qualitative evaluation results in a more likely than not determination or if a qualitative evaluation is not performed. For the indefinite-lived tradename, we utilize the royalty relief method in our quantitative evaluations.
Based on the existence of an impairment indicator during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, namely the sustained decrease in our market capitalization, the Company performed an interim quantitative assessment of the fair value of the Vitamin Shoppe tradename based on the royalty relief method. The significant inputs to this valuation model were the Company’s revenue projections, the royalty rate and the discount rate. The revenue projections were based on the Company’s updated long-range plan and excluded the net sales attributable to the manufacturing reporting segment. The royalty rate was derived using a Company specific profit split analysis, as compared to royalty data from the market, given the recent circumstances regarding the Company's performance. The discount rate was based on a weighted average cost of capital calculation, which was adjusted for the associated risk.
Based on this analysis, the fair value of the Vitamin Shoppe tradename was $9.0 million as compared to the carrying value of $68.4 million. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge on the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $59.4 million in the third quarter of Fiscal 2017.

Our annual and interim impairment reviews require extensive use of accounting judgment and financial estimates. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on market conditions and operational performance of the business. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist, and therefore that our indefinite-lived intangible asset may be further impaired. The valuation of our indefinite-lived intangible asset is affected by, among other things, our business plan for the future and estimated results of future operations. Changes in the business plan, operating results, or application of alternative assumptions that are different than the estimates used to develop the valuation of the asset may materially impact the valuation.

Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of all long-lived assets for impairment, primarily at an individual store level, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The frequency of these tests may change in future periods if performance warrants. Our impairment analyses determine whether projected cash flow from operations are sufficient to recover the carrying value of these assets. Impairment may result when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows over its remaining useful life. For store impairment, our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the store lease term is based upon our experience, the historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability and economic conditions. The estimates of future store profitability and economic conditions require estimating such factors including sales growth, gross margin, employment costs and inflation, and as a result are subject to variability. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. If a long-lived asset is found to be impaired, the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the asset's carrying value and its fair value. Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate that approximates our weighted average cost of capital.
Significant assumptions used in these projections include an assessment of future store profitability, future overall economic conditions, our ability to control future costs and successfully implement initiatives designed to enhance sales and gross margins. To the extent that management's estimates of future performance are not realized, future assessments could result in material impairment charges.
General Definitions for Operating Results
Net Sales consist of sales, net of sales returns, deferred sales, customer incentives and a provision for estimated future returns. Total comparable net sales include retail sales fulfilled in stores and direct to consumer in both reporting periods. Sales generated by retail stores after 410 days of operation are included in comparable net sales. Sales to third parties of manufactured products generated by Nutri-Force are considered non-comparable sales.
Cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory sold, costs of warehousing, distribution, manufacturing and store occupancy costs. Warehousing, distribution and manufacturing costs, which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold, include freight to transfer merchandise, costs associated with our buying department, distribution facilities and manufacturing overhead. Store occupancy costs include rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes and utilities.

Gross profit is net sales minus cost of goods sold.
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of operating payroll and related benefits, advertising and promotion expense, depreciation and amortization expenses not capitalized in cost of goods sold, and other selling, general and administrative expenses.
Income (loss) from operations consists of gross profit minus selling, general and administrative expenses.

Interest expense, net includes interest on our Convertible Notes and Revolving Credit Facility, letters of credit fees, interest on our capital leases, as well as amortization of financing costs, reduced by interest income earned from highly liquid investments (investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less).
Key Performance Indicators and Statistics
We use a number of key indicators of financial condition and operating results to evaluate the performance of our business, including the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Net sales$304,837
 $332,717
 $621,738
 $669,491
$288,186
 $314,887
 $909,924
 $984,378
Increase (decrease) in total comparable net sales (1)(8.3)% 1.6% (7.3)% (0.2)%
Increase (decrease) in comparable store net sales(7.6)% 0.8% (6.7)% (0.9)%
Decrease in total comparable net sales (1) (2)(6.6)% (1.9)% (7.1)% (0.5)%
Decrease in comparable store net sales (3)(7.0)% (2.3)% (6.8)% (1.4)%
Increase (decrease) in VS.com comparable net sales (2)(4)(20.2)% 15.2% (14.6)% 8.3 %(5.0)% 1.7 % (11.6)% 6.8 %
Gross profit as a percent of net sales28.4 % 32.4% 29.8 % 33.5 %29.9 % 32.4 % 29.8 % 33.1 %
Income (loss) from operations$(168,254) $20,724
 $(152,645) $47,986
$(108,335) $20,273
 $(260,980) $68,259
(1)Total comparable net sales are comprised of comparable fulfilled in retail store sales and direct to consumer sales.
(2)Excluding the impact of recent hurricanes which disrupted store operations in the effected areas, total comparable net sales were (5.8)% and (6.8)% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017, respectively.
(3)Excluding the impact of recent hurricanes which disrupted store operations in the effected areas, comparable store net sales were (6.2)% and (6.5)% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017, respectively.
(4)VS.com comparable net sales excludes sales from third party marketplaces.
The following table shows the growth in our network of stores during the three and sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016:
Three Months Ended Six Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Store Data:              
Stores open at beginning of period780
 766
 775
 758
783
 771
 775
 758
Stores opened3
 9
 9
 18
3
 5
 12
 23
Stores closed
 (4) (1) (5)(2) (2) (3) (7)
Stores open at end of period783
 771
 783
 771
784
 774
 784
 774
Total retail square footage at end of period (in thousands)2,731
 2,701
 2,731
 2,701
2,733
 2,710
 2,733
 2,710
Average store square footage at end of period3,488
 3,503
 3,488
 3,503
3,486
 3,501
 3,486
 3,501


Three Months Ended July 1,September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 25,September 24, 2016
The information presented below is for the three months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 and was derived from our consolidated financial statements, which, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for such periods and as of such dates.
The following tables summarize our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and September 24, 2016 (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended    
 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net sales$288,186
 $314,887
 $(26,701) (8.5)%
Cost of goods sold202,062
 212,762
 (10,700) (5.0)%
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales70.1 % 67.6%    
Gross profit86,124
 102,125
 (16,001) (15.7)%
Gross profit as % of net sales29.9 % 32.4%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses88,459
 81,655
 6,804
 8.3 %
SG&A expenses as % of net sales30.7 % 25.9%    
Goodwill, tradename and store fixed-asset impairment charges106,000
 197
 105,803
 nm
Goodwill, tradename and store fixed-asset impairment charges as % of net sales36.8 % 0.1%    
Income (loss) from operations(108,335) 20,273
 (128,608) (634.4)%
Income (loss) from operations as % of net sales(37.6)% 6.4%    
Interest expense, net2,426
 2,363
 63
 2.7 %
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(110,761) 17,910
 (128,671) (718.4)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(24,611) 6,547
 (31,158) (475.9)%
Net income (loss)$(86,150) $11,363
 $(97,513) (858.2)%
Net Sales
Net sales decreased 8.5% as a result of a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $19.7 million, or 6.6% and a decrease in Nutri-Force net sales of $8.0 million to third parties offset by an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of $1.1 million. Sales decreased $12.4 million in the Sports Nutrition category which is primarily the result of an increase in competitive activity in our industry. Net sales were lower by $2.4 million as a result of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria.
Net sales for our two business segments, as well as a discussion of the changes in each segment's net sales from the comparable prior year period, are provided below (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended    
 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net Sales:       
Retail (a)$282,408
 $301,077
 $(18,669) (6.2)%
Manufacturing (b)20,872
 24,357
 (3,485) (14.3)%
Segment net sales303,280
 325,434
 (22,154) (6.8)%
Elimination of intersegment revenues(15,094) (10,547) (4,547) 43.1 %
Total net sales$288,186
 $314,887
 $(26,701) (8.5)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.

(a)The change in retail sales resulted from a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $19.7 million, or 6.6% offset by an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of $1.1 million. The decrease in total comparable net sales was primarily due to lower sales in the Sports Nutrition category.
(b)Manufacturing sales reflect a decrease of $8.0 million in product manufactured for third parties offset by an increase of $4.5 million in product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment.

Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes product, warehouse, distribution, manufacturing and occupancy costs. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased by 2.5%. This increase was driven by supply chain deleverage of 1.5%, occupancy deleverage of 0.9%, impairment of inventory related to the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of 0.7% and retail product margin decline of 0.4%. This was partially offset by 0.6% from improvements in gross margin at Nutri-Force and an increase in net deferred inventory costs of 0.3% due to a slower inventory sell-through rate.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 Three Months Ended    
 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
SG&A Expenses (in thousands):       
Store Payroll and Benefits (a)$34,524
 $32,863
 $1,661
 5.1%
Store Payroll & benefits as % of net sales12.0% 10.4%    
Advertising and Promotion (b)8,676
 5,669
 3,007
 53.0%
Advertising & promotion as % of net sales3.0% 1.8%    
Other SG&A (c)45,259
 43,123
 2,136
 5.0%
Other SG&A as % of net sales15.7% 13.7%    
Total SG&A Expenses$88,459
 $81,655
 $6,804
 8.3%

(a)Store payroll and benefits increased primarily due to an increase in average wage rate.
(b)Advertising and promotion expenses increased primarily due to higher retail expenditures focused on improving customer acquisition trends as a result of the competitive environment in our industry.
(c)The three months ended September 30, 2017 includes Nutri-Force turnaround costs of $1.8 million and costs related to the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of $0.3 million and the three months ended September 24, 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $2.3 million and a reversal of lease liabilities previously accrued related to the closing of the Canada stores of $0.9 million.

Goodwill, Tradename and Store Fixed-Asset Impairment Charges
The three months ended September 30, 2017 includes a tradename impairment charge of $59.4 million, a goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million and store fixed-asset impairment charges of $0.3 million. The three months ended September 24, 2016 includes store fixed-asset impairment charges of $0.2 million.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Operating income (loss) for our two business segments are provided below (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended    
 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$16,104
 $34,344
 $(18,240) (53.1)%
% of net sales5.7 % 11.4 %    
Manufacturing (b)(4,530) (734) (3,796) 517.2 %
% of net sales(21.7)% (3.0)%    
Corporate costs (c)(119,909) (13,337) (106,572) 799.1 %
% of net sales(41.6)% (4.2)%    
Income (loss) from operations$(108,335) $20,273
 $(128,608) (634.4)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(a)The decrease in retail income from operations as a rate of sales is primarily due to supply chain deleverage of 1.5%, store payroll and benefits of 1.3%, advertising and promotion expenses of 1.3%, occupancy deleverage of 0.9%, impairment of inventory related to the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of 0.7% and retail product margin decline of 0.4%. This was partially offset by an increase in net deferred inventory costs of 0.9% due to a slower inventory sell-through rate. Retail income from operations was lower by $1.6 million resulting from the impact of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria.
(b)The increase in manufacturing loss from operations was primarily due to a $1.8 million impact resulting from a change in the inventory turn assumption, $1.7 million of turnaround costs and lower sales to third party customers.
(c)The three months ended September 30, 2017 includes a tradename impairment charge of $59.4 million and a goodwill impairment charge of $46.3 million and the three months ended September 24, 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $2.3 million.

Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was relatively flat during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September 24, 2016.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The effective provision (benefit) tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was (22.2%), compared to 36.6% for the three months ended September 24, 2016. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the non-deductibility of the goodwill impairment charge.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 24, 2016
The information presented below is for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 24, 2016 and was derived from our consolidated financial statements, which, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for such periods and as of such dates.

The following tables summarize our results of operations for the threenine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended    
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net sales$304,837
 $332,717
 $(27,880) (8.4)%$909,924
 $984,378
 $(74,454) (7.6)%
Cost of goods sold218,222
 224,893
 (6,671) (3.0)%638,371
 658,182
 (19,811) (3.0)%
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales71.6 % 67.6%    70.2 % 66.9%    
Gross profit86,615
 107,824
 (21,209) (19.7)%271,553
 326,196
 (54,643) (16.8)%
Gross profit as % of net sales28.4 % 32.4%    29.8 % 33.1%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses86,779
 87,100
 (321) (0.4)%258,443
 257,522
 921
 0.4 %
SG&A expenses as % of net sales28.5 % 26.2%    28.4 % 26.2%    
Goodwill and store fixed-asset impairment charges168,090
 
 168,090
 nm
Goodwill and store fixed-asset impairment charges as % of net sales55.1 % na
    
Goodwill, tradename and store fixed-asset impairment charges274,090
 415
 273,675
 nm
Goodwill, tradename and store fixed-asset impairment charges as % of net sales30.1 % %    
Income (loss) from operations(168,254) 20,724
 (188,978) (911.9)%(260,980) 68,259
 (329,239) (482.3)%
Income (loss) from operations as % of net sales(55.2)% 6.2%    (28.7)% 6.9%    
Interest expense, net2,374
 2,352
 22
 0.9 %7,212
 6,977
 235
 3.4 %
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(170,628) 18,372
 (189,000) (1,028.7)%(268,192) 61,282
 (329,474) (537.6)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(14,209) 7,939
 (22,148) (279.0)%(33,619) 24,704
 (58,323) (236.1)%
Net income (loss)$(156,419) $10,433
 $(166,852) (1,599.3)%$(234,573) $36,578
 $(271,151) (741.3)%
Net Sales
Net sales decreased 8.4%7.6% as a result of a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $26.5$66.4 million, or 8.3%7.1% and a decrease in Nutri-Force net sales of $3.2$13.0 million to third parties offset by an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of $1.8$5.0 million. Sales decreased $14.7$40.2 million in the Sports Nutrition category which is primarily the result of an increase in competitive promotional activity in our industry. Net sales were lower by $2.4 million as a result of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria.
Net sales for our two business segments, as well as a discussion of the changes in each segment's net sales from the comparable prior year period, are provided below (in thousands):
Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended    
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net Sales:              
Retail (a)$296,419
 $321,063
 $(24,644) (7.7)%$884,599
 $946,004
 $(61,405) (6.5)%
Manufacturing (b)23,349
 20,778
 2,571
 12.4 %65,886
 65,695
 191
 0.3 %
Segment net sales319,768
 341,841
 (22,073) (6.5)%950,485
 1,011,699
 (61,214) (6.1)%
Elimination of intersegment revenues(14,931) (9,124) (5,807) 63.6 %(40,561) (27,321) (13,240) 48.5 %
Total net sales$304,837
 $332,717
 $(27,880) (8.4)%$909,924
 $984,378
 $(74,454) (7.6)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(a)The change in retail sales resulted from a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $26.5$66.4 million, or 8.3%7.1% offset by an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of $1.8$5.0 million. The decrease in total comparable net sales was primarily due to lower sales in the Sports Nutrition category.
(b)Manufacturing sales reflect an increase of $5.8$13.2 million in product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment offset by a decrease of $3.2$13.0 million in product manufactured for third parties.


Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes product, warehouse, distribution, manufacturing and occupancy costs. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased primarily due to an increase of 3.6% due to Nutri-Force, an increase of 1.1% related to occupancy which deleveraged as a result of the decline in net sales and an increase of 1.0% resulting from supply chain costs, partially offset by a 1.7% improvement in retail product margin. The increase in cost of goods sold due to Nutri-Force3.3%. This includes approximately $10.7$10.5 million, or 3.5%1.2% as a percentage of net sales, of Nutri-Force turnaround costs for the impairment of inventory and manufacturing equipment. This also includes supply chain deleverage of 1.2%, occupancy deleverage of 1.1% and impairment of inventory related to the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of 0.2%. This was partially offset by total product margin improvement of 0.4%.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended    
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
SG&A Expenses (in thousands):              
Store Payroll and Benefits (a)$34,511
 $34,020
 $491
 1.4 %$102,333
 $100,728
 $1,605
 1.6 %
Store Payroll & benefits as % of net sales11.3% 10.2%    11.2% 10.2%    
Advertising and Promotion (b)7,050
 6,322
 728
 11.5 %21,588
 18,063
 3,525
 19.5 %
Advertising & promotion as % of net sales2.3% 1.9%    2.4% 1.8%    
Other SG&A (c)45,218
 46,758
 (1,540) (3.3)%134,522
 138,731
 (4,209) (3.0)%
Other SG&A as % of net sales14.8% 14.1%    14.8% 14.1%    
Total SG&A Expenses$86,779
 $87,100
 $(321) (0.4)%$258,443
 $257,522
 $921
 0.4 %
 

(a)Store payroll and benefits increased primarily due to an increase in average wage rate.
(b)Advertising and promotion expenses increased primarily due to higher retail expenditures offset by lower expenditures related to Nutri-Force.focused on improving customer acquisition trends as a result of the competitive environment in our industry.
(c)The second quarter of Fiscalnine months ended September 30, 2017 includes Nutri-Force turnaround costs of $3.0$5.5 million and the second quarter of Fiscal 2016 included costs related to the closing of the Canada storesour North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of $1.9$0.3 million and the nine months ended September 24, 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $1.5$3.8 million, costs related to the closing of the Canada stores of $2.1 million, Super Supplements conversion costs of $1.3 million and reinvention strategy costs of $0.5 million.

Goodwill, Tradename and Store Fixed-Asset Impairment Charges
The second quarter of Fiscalnine months ended September 30, 2017 includes goodwill impairment charges of $210.6 million, a goodwilltradename impairment charge of $164.3$59.4 million and store fixed-asset impairment charges of $3.8$4.1 million. The nine months ended September 24, 2016 includes store fixed-asset impairment charges of $0.4 million.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Operating income (loss) for our two business segments are provided below (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended    
 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$24,402
 $37,356
 $(12,954) (34.7)%
% of net sales8.2 % 11.6 %    
Manufacturing (b)(15,881) (1,822) (14,059) nm
% of net sales(68.0)% (8.8)%    
Corporate costs (c)(176,775) (14,810) (161,965) 1,093.6 %
% of net sales(58.0)% (4.5)%    
Income (loss) from operations$(168,254) $20,724
 $(188,978) (911.9)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.

(a)The decrease in retail income from operations as a rate of sales is primarily due to 1.2% for store impairment charges, 1.1% related to occupancy, 1.1% from store payroll and benefits, 1.0% from supply chain costs and 0.5% related to advertising and promotion expenses partially offset by 1.7% related to product margin.
(b)The increase in manufacturing loss from operations was primarily due to $13.7 million of turnaround costs and lower sales to third party customers.
(c)The second quarter of Fiscal 2017 includes a goodwill impairment charge of $164.3 million and the second quarter of Fiscal 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $1.5 million.

Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was relatively flat during the three months ended July 1, 2017 as compared to the three months ended June 25, 2016.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective provision (benefit) tax rate for the three months ended July 1, 2017 was (8.3%), compared to 43.2% for the three months ended June 25, 2016. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the non-deductible portion of the goodwill impairment charge and $1.2 million of permanent tax differences.

Six Months Ended July 1, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 25, 2016
The information presented below is for the six months ended July 1, 2017 and June 25, 2016 and was derived from our consolidated financial statements, which, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for such periods and as of such dates.
The following tables summarize our results of operations for the six months ended July 1, 2017 and June 25, 2016 (in thousands):
 Six Months Ended    
 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net sales$621,738
 $669,491
 $(47,753) (7.1)%
Cost of goods sold436,309
 445,420
 (9,111) (2.0)%
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales70.2 % 66.5%    
Gross profit185,429
 224,071
 (38,642) (17.2)%
Gross profit as % of net sales29.8 % 33.5%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses169,984
 175,867
 (5,883) (3.3)%
SG&A expenses as % of net sales27.3 % 26.3%    
Goodwill and store fixed-asset impairment charges168,090
 218
 167,872
 nm
Goodwill and store fixed-asset impairment charges as % of net sales27.0 % %    
Income (loss) from operations(152,645) 47,986
 (200,631) (418.1)%
Income (loss) from operations as % of net sales(24.6)% 7.2%    
Interest expense, net4,786
 4,614
 172
 3.7 %
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(157,431) 43,372
 (200,803) (463.0)%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(9,008) 18,157
 (27,165) (149.6)%
Net income (loss)$(148,423) $25,215
 $(173,638) (688.6)%
Net Sales
Net sales decreased 7.1% as a result of a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $46.7 million, or 7.3% and a decrease in Nutri-Force net sales of $5.0 million to third parties offset by an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of

$4.0 million. Sales decreased $27.8 million in the Sports Nutrition category which is primarily the result of an increase in competitive promotional activity in our industry.
Net sales for our two business segments, as well as a discussion of the changes in each segment's net sales from the comparable prior year period, are provided below (in thousands):
 Six Months Ended    
 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net Sales:       
Retail (a)$602,191
 $644,927
 $(42,736) (6.6)%
Manufacturing (b)45,014
 41,338
 3,676
 8.9 %
Segment net sales647,205
 686,265
 (39,060) (5.7)%
Elimination of intersegment revenues(25,467) (16,774) (8,693) 51.8 %
Total net sales$621,738
 $669,491
 $(47,753) (7.1)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(a)The change in retail sales resulted from a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $46.7 million, or 7.3% offset by an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of $4.0 million. The decrease in total comparable net sales was primarily due to lower sales in the Sports Nutrition category.
(b)Manufacturing sales reflect an increase of $8.7 million in product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment offset by a decrease of $5.0 million in product manufactured for third parties.

Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes product, warehouse, distribution, manufacturing and occupancy costs. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased primarily due to an increase of 2.2% due to Nutri-Force, an increase of 1.0% related to occupancy which deleveraged as a result of the decline in net sales and an increase of 1.0% resulting from supply chain costs, partially offset by a 0.5% improvement in retail product margin. The increase in cost of goods sold due to Nutri-Force includes approximately $10.7 million, or 1.7% as a percentage of net sales, of turnaround costs for the impairment of inventory and manufacturing equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 Six Months Ended    
 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016 
$
Change
 
%
Change
SG&A Expenses (in thousands):       
Store Payroll and Benefits (a)$67,809
 $67,865
 $(56) (0.1)%
Store Payroll & benefits as % of net sales10.9% 10.1%    
Advertising and Promotion (b)12,912
 12,394
 518
 4.2 %
Advertising & promotion as % of net sales2.1% 1.9%    
Other SG&A (c)89,263
 95,608
 (6,345) (6.6)%
Other SG&A as % of net sales14.4% 14.3%    
Total SG&A Expenses$169,984
 $175,867
 $(5,883) (3.3)%
 Nine Months Ended    
 September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$74,531
 $116,451
 $(41,920) (36.0)%
% of net sales8.4 % 12.3 %    
Manufacturing (b)(23,643) (2,818) (20,825) 517.2 %
% of net sales(35.9)% (4.3)%    
Corporate costs (c)(311,868) (45,374) (266,494) 587.3 %
% of net sales(34.3)% (4.6)%    
Income (loss) from operations$(260,980) $68,259
 $(329,239) (482.3)%
 

(a)Store payroll and benefits were flat.
(b)Advertising and promotion expenses increased primarily due to higher retail expenditures offset by lower expenditures related to Nutri-Force.
(c)The first half of Fiscal 2017 includes Nutri-Force turnaround costs of $3.6 million and the first half of Fiscal 2016 included costs related to the closing of the Canada stores of $3.0 million, outside consulting costs relating to a project

to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $1.5 million, Super Supplements conversion costs of $1.3 million and reinvention strategy costs of $0.5 million.

Goodwill and Store Fixed-Asset Impairment Charges
The first half of Fiscal 2017 includes a goodwill impairment charge of $164.3 million and store fixed-asset impairment charges of $3.8 million. The first half of Fiscal 2016 includes a store fixed-asset impairment charge of $0.2 million.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Operating income (loss) for our two business segments are provided below (in thousands):
 Six Months Ended    
 July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016* 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$58,427
 $82,107
 $(23,680) (28.8)%
% of net sales9.7 % 12.7 %    
Manufacturing (b)(19,113) (2,084) (17,029) nm
% of net sales(42.5)% (5.0)%    
Corporate costs (c)(191,959) (32,037) (159,922) 499.2 %
% of net sales(30.9)% (4.8)%    
Income (loss) from operations$(152,645) $47,986
 $(200,631) (418.1)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(a)The decrease in retail income from operations as a rate of sales is primarily due to 1.0% related to occupancy, 0.9% from supply chain costs, 0.7% fromdeleverage of 1.1%, occupancy deleverage of 1.0%, store payroll and benefits 0.6% for store impairment charges and 0.3% related toof 0.9%, advertising and promotion expenses of 0.7%, store impairment charges of 0.4% and impairment of inventory related to the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of 0.2%. This was partially offset by 0.5% relatedproduct margin improvement of 0.3% and an increase in net deferred inventory costs of 0.3% due to product margin.a slower inventory sell-through rate. Retail income from operations was lower by $1.6 million resulting from the impact of Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria.
(b)The increase in manufacturing loss from operations was primarily due to $14.3$16.0 million of turnaround costs, a $1.8 million impact resulting from a change in the inventory turn assumption and lower sales to third party customers.
(c)The first half of Fiscalnine months ended September 30, 2017 included goodwill impairment charges of $210.6 million, a goodwilltradename impairment charge of $164.3$59.4 million and the first half of Fiscalnine months ended September 24, 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $1.5$3.8 million and reinvention strategy costs of $0.5 million.

Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was relatively flat during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 as compared to the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The effective provision (benefit) tax rate for the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 was (5.7%(12.5%), compared to 41.9%40.3% for the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the non-deductible portion of the goodwill impairment chargecharges and $1.3$1.4 million of permanent tax differences.


Key Indicators of Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table provides key indicators of our liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):
As ofAs of
July 1, 2017 December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Balance Sheet Data:      
Cash and cash equivalents$2,003
 $2,833
$1,904
 $2,833
Working capital (a)153,671
 151,548
150,712
 151,548
Total assets582,491
 734,184
519,010
 734,184
Total debt (b)128,764
 133,371
139,041
 133,371
(a) Working capital is total current assets minus total current liabilities.
(b) Total debt includes the outstanding balance on the Company's Revolving Credit Facility, the net balance of its Convertible Notes and its capital lease obligations.
Six Months EndedNine Months Ended
July 1, 2017 June 25, 2016September 30, 2017 September 24, 2016
Other Information:      
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets$15,839
 $19,440
$23,548
 $28,812
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In):      
Operating activities$38,074
 $54,941
$42,973
 $78,088
Investing activities(28,534) (21,176)(43,627) (31,449)
Financing activities(10,381) (46,930)(306) (59,776)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents11
 53
31
 56
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(830) $(13,112)$(929) $(13,081)

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary uses of cash have been to fund working capital, operating expenses and capital expenditures related primarily to the build-out of new stores, the transformation of existing stores and information technology investments as well as to repurchase shares of our common stock. Historically, we have financed our requirements predominately through internally generated cash flow, supplemented with short-term financing. We believe that the cash generated by operations and cash and cash equivalents, together with the borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs for the next twelve months, our store transformation growth plans, costs and investments related to our reinvention strategy, systems development, store improvements the opening of our new distribution center and interest payments on the Convertible Notes, as well as the repurchase of shares of our common stock and our Convertible Notes from time to time in negotiated or open market transactions subject to market conditions.
During Fiscal 2017, we plan to spend approximately $45$50 million in capital expenditures, including costs for building new stores, transforming existing stores, information technology, the opening of our new distribution center and investments resulting from our reinvention strategy. Of the total capital expenditures projected for Fiscal 2017, we have invested $28.4$43.3 million during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017. We expect to open approximately 15 new stores in Fiscal 2017, of which we have opened nine12 stores and closed one storethree stores as of July 1,September 30, 2017. Our working capital requirements for merchandise inventory will continue to increase as we continue to open additional stores. Currently, our practice is to establish an inventory level of approximately $160,000 at cost for each of our stores, the cost of which is partially offset by vendor incentive and allowance programs. Additionally, 30 day payment terms have been extended to us by some of our suppliers allowing us to effectively manage our inventory and working capital.
The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents, and at times holds cash balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. Currently, the Company’s cash management practice is to hold cash balances in quality institutions and invest in highly liquid and secure investments.

We were in compliance with all covenants relating to our Revolving Credit Facility and Convertible Notes as of July 1,September 30, 2017. We expect to be in compliance with these same covenants during the remainder of Fiscal 2017 and through Fiscal 2018 as well.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $38.1$43.0 million for the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 as compared to $54.9$78.1 million for the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016. The $16.9$35.1 million decrease in cash flows from operating activities is primarily due to the decrease in net income partially offset by the change in inventory.before impairment charges.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $28.5$43.6 million during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 as compared to $21.2$31.4 million during the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016. Capital expenditures during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 were used primarily for the new distribution center, the transformation of existing stores and information technology investments. Capital expenditures during the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016 were used primarily for the build-out of new stores, the remodeling of existing stores and information technology investments. The Company opened nine12 new stores during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 as compared to 1823 new stores during the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $10.4$0.3 million for the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017, as compared to $46.9$59.8 million for the sixnine months ended June 25,September 24, 2016. The $36.5$59.5 million decrease in cash used in financing activities is primarily due to a decrease in purchases of common stock under the Company's share repurchase programs partially offset byand the change in net borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Revolving Credit Facility
The terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, which were amended on May 9, 2017, extend through May 9, 2022, and allow the Company to borrow up to $90.0 million, subject to the terms of the facility, with a Company option to increase the facility up to a total of $150.0 million. For information regarding the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, refer to Note 5., “Credit Arrangements” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited). As of July 1,September 30, 2017, the Company had $3.0$12.0 million of borrowings outstanding on its Revolving Credit Facility. The largest amount borrowed during the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017 and June 25,September 24, 2016 was $38.0 million and $21.0$27.0 million, respectively. The unused available line of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility at July 1,September 30, 2017 was $84.0$75.2 million.

Convertible Notes
On December 9, 2015, the Company issued $143.8 million of its 2.25% Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest is payable on the Convertible Notes on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on June 1, 2016 until their maturity date of December 1, 2020. For additional information regarding the terms of our Convertible Notes, refer to Note 5., “Credit Arrangements”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
On May 5, 2017, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $70.0 million of equity and equity-linked securities (such as the Convertible Notes). Refer to Note 10., "Share Repurchase Programs" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for additional information.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As of July 1,September 30, 2017, there have been no material changes with respect to our contractual obligations since December 31, 2016. For additional information, see Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, in the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating our business. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into our financial statements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. The Company has commitments for its operating leases, primarily related to its stores, distribution centers, as well as its manufacturing and corporate facilities, which are not reflected on our balance sheet. For

additional information, see Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, in the Fiscal 2016 10-K.
Effects of Inflation
We do not believe that our sales or operating results have been materially affected by inflation during the periods presented in our financial statements. During the sixnine months ended July 1,September 30, 2017, retail price inflationdeflation was less thanapproximately 1%. During Fiscal 2017, we anticipate market driven cost inflation to be in the range of 0% to 2%. Additionally, we may experience increased cost pressure from our suppliers which could have an adverse effect on our gross profit results in the future.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Except as discussed in Note 1., “Basis of Presentation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), the Company has considered all new accounting pronouncements and has concluded that there are no new pronouncements that may have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, based on current information.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting us, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk" in Item 7A of Part II of our Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K. As of July 1,September 30, 2017, our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since December 31, 2016.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who are our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rules l3a-15(e) and l5d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of July 1,September 30, 2017, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-l5 and 15d-15. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of July 1,September 30, 2017.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended July 1,September 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings
None.The Company is party to various lawsuits arising from time to time in the normal course of business, some of which are covered by insurance. Although the impact of the final resolution of these matters on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
In addition, on or about August 22, 2017, a federal securities class action suit was filed in the United States District Court in the District of New Jersey against Vitamin Shoppe and certain officers and directors on behalf of purchasers of Vitamin Shoppe common stock between March 1, 2017 and August 6, 2017, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 alleging that the defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the purported then-ongoing improvements being achieved, the company’s profitability trends, and its financial results. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we are vigorously defending the lawsuit.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a more detailed explanation of the factors affecting our business, please refer to the Risk Factors section in the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K. There has not been a material change to the risk factors set forth in the Fiscal 2016 Form 10-K.
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of shares of common stock during the quarter ended July 1,September 30, 2017:
Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
Units)
Purchased (1)
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit)
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units)
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs (2)
 
Maximum  Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
(in thousands)
April 2, 2017 through April 29, 201726,594
 $18.78
 
 $30,066
April 30, 2017 through May 27, 2017 (3)953
 $12.65
 
 $100,066
May 28, 2017 through July 1, 20172,233
 $11.23
 
 $100,066
Totals29,780
   
  
Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
Units)
Purchased (1)
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit)
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units)
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs (2)
 
Maximum  Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
(in thousands)
July 2, 2017 through July 29, 2017
 $
 
 $100,066
July 30, 2017 through August 26, 20172,845
 $5.62
 
 $100,066
August 27, 2017 through September 30, 20171,093
 $5.17
 
 $100,066
Totals3,938
   
  
 

(1)Shares withheld to cover required tax payments on behalf of employees as their restricted shares vest.
(2)On August 5, 2014, May 6, 2015 and November 23, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved share repurchase programs that enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of its shares of common stock from time to time over three year periods ending on August 4, 2017, May 5, 2018 and November 22, 2018, respectively.
(3)On May 5, 2017, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $70.0 million of equity and equity-linked securities. This repurchase authorization expires on November 22, 2018.
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.    Other Information
None.

Item 6.    Exhibits
Exhibit
No.                        Description
3.1
3.2
10.1Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2017, by and among itself, Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Mariner, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Global, Inc., VS Hercules LLC, FDC Vitamins, LLC, Betancourt Sports Nutrition, LLC, Vitamin Shoppe Procurement, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2017 (File No. 001-34507))
10.2Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan* (Incorporated by reference to Annex A of the Definitive Proxy Statement of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. filed on April 27, 2017 (File No. 001-34507))
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.1The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the period ended July 1,September 30, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

* Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.


SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on August 9,November 8, 2017.
   
VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC.
  
By: /s/ Brenda Galgano
  Brenda Galgano
  EVP and Chief Financial Officer


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.                        Description
3.1
3.2
10.1Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2017, by and among itself, Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Mariner, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Global, Inc., VS Hercules LLC, FDC Vitamins, LLC, Betancourt Sports Nutrition, LLC, Vitamin Shoppe Procurement, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders from time to time parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2017 (File No. 001-34507))
10.2Amended 2009 Equity Incentive Plan* (Incorporated by reference to Annex A of the Definitive Proxy Statement of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. filed on April 27, 2017 (File No. 001-34507))
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.1
The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the period ended July 1,September 30, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

* Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.


3639