UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

☒    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017

2022


OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

☐    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from _________ to _________


Commission File Number 0-25923

Eagle Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                 Maryland     52-2061461
Maryland52-2061461
(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
7830 Old Georgetown Road, Third Floor, Bethesda, Maryland20814
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(301)986-1800

(Registrant’sRegistrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par valueEGBNThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated" "accelerated filer,” “smaller" "smaller reporting company”company" and “emerging"emerging growth company”company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer   (Do not mark if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller Reporting Company

Emerging Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Act Yes No

As of October 31, 2017,November 4, 2022, the registrant had 34,178,01431,918,670 shares of Common Stock outstanding.




EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION
7
8
49
77
77
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
81


2


PART I.I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 – Financial Statements (Unaudited)

EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Assets
Cash and due from banks$27,235 $12,886 
Federal funds sold69,809 20,391 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks and other short-term investments47,131 1,680,945 
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $1,873,872 and $2,642,667, respectively, and allowance for credit losses of $18 and $620, respectively).1,649,753 2,623,408 
Investment securities held-to-maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $802 and $0 (fair value of $989,001 and $0, respectively)1,114,084 — 
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock42,311 34,153 
Loans held for sale9,387 47,218 
Loans7,304,498 7,065,598 
Less: allowance for credit losses(75,767)(74,965)
Loans, net7,228,731 6,990,633 
Premises and equipment, net13,684 14,557 
Operating lease right-of-use assets26,022 30,555 
Deferred income taxes112,904 43,174 
Bank-owned life insurance110,678 108,789 
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net104,240 105,793 
Other real estate owned1,962 1,635 
Other assets155,113 133,173 
Total Assets$10,713,044 $11,847,310 
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand$2,928,774 $3,277,956 
Interest-bearing transaction964,567 777,255 
Savings and money market4,220,768 5,197,247 
Time649,241 729,082 
Total deposits8,763,350 9,981,540 
Customer repurchase agreements21,465 23,918 
Other short-term borrowings515,000 300,000 
Long-term borrowings69,763 69,670 
Operating lease liabilities30,837 35,501 
Reserve for unfunded commitments5,696 4,379 
Other liabilities87,162 81,527 
Total Liabilities9,493,273 10,496,535 
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; shares authorized 100,000,000, shares issued and outstanding 32,082,321 and 31,950,092, respectively318 316 
Additional paid-in capital442,880 434,640 
Retained earnings987,212 930,061 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(210,639)(14,242)
Total Shareholders' Equity1,219,771 1,350,775 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$10,713,044 $11,847,310 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3


EAGLE BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Assets September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
Cash and due from banks $8,246  $10,285  $8,678 
Federal funds sold  8,548   2,397   5,262 
Interest bearing deposits with banks and other short-term investments  432,156   355,481   505,087 
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value  556,026   538,108   430,668 
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock  30,980   21,600   19,920 
Loans held for sale  25,980   51,629   78,118 
Loans  6,084,204   5,677,893   5,481,975 
Less allowance for credit losses  (62,967)  (59,074)  (56,864)
Loans, net  6,021,237   5,618,819   5,425,111 
Premises and equipment, net  19,546   20,661   19,370 
Deferred income taxes  45,432   48,220   41,065 
Bank owned life insurance  61,238   60,130   59,747 
Intangible assets, net  107,150   107,419   107,694 
Other real estate owned  1,394   2,694   5,194 
Other assets  75,723   52,653   56,218 
Total Assets $7,393,656  $6,890,096  $6,762,132 
             
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity            
Liabilities            
Deposits:            
Noninterest bearing demand $1,843,157  $1,775,684  $1,668,271 
Interest bearing transaction  429,247   289,122   297,973 
Savings and money market  2,818,871   2,902,560   2,802,519 
Time, $100,000 or more  482,325   464,842   452,015 
Other time  340,352   283,906   337,371 
Total deposits  5,913,952   5,716,114   5,558,149 
Customer repurchase agreements  73,569   68,876   71,642 
Other short-term borrowings  200,000      50,000 
Long-term borrowings  216,807   216,514   216,419 
Other liabilities  55,346   45,793   50,283 
Total Liabilities  6,459,674   6,047,297   5,946,493 
             
Shareholders’ Equity            
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; shares authorized 100,000,000, shares issued and outstanding 34,174,009, 34,023,850, and 33,590,880, respectively  340   338   333 
Warrant        946 
Additional paid in capital  518,616   513,531   509,706 
Retained earnings  415,975   331,311   305,594 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (949)  (2,381)  (940)
Total Shareholders’ Equity  933,982   842,799   815,639 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity $7,393,656  $6,890,096  $6,762,132 

Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2022202120222021
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans$93,744 $82,182 $249,716 $260,124 
Interest and dividends on investment securities13,463 5,877 37,890 15,878 
Interest on balances with other banks and short-term investments4,100 1,083 7,608 2,239 
Interest on federal funds sold220 10 269 25 
Total interest income111,527 89,152 295,483 278,266 
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits26,125 6,590 44,022 21,288 
Interest on customer repurchase agreements55 14 90 34 
Interest on other short-term borrowings412 506 992 1,502 
Interest on long-term borrowings1,038 2,997 3,112 9,114 
Total interest expense27,630 10,107 48,216 31,938 
Net Interest Income83,897 79,045 247,267 246,328 
Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Losses3,022 (8,203)730 (14,409)
Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Losses for Unfunded Commitments774 716 1,316 (487)
Net Interest Income After Provision for (Reversal of) Credit Losses80,101 86,532 245,221 261,224 
Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposits1,339 1,204 3,970 3,303 
Gain on sale of loans821 3,332 3,168 11,988 
Net gain (loss) on sale of investment securities1,519 (172)2,058 
Increase in the cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance631 642 1,889 1,429 
Other income2,513 1,602 9,470 11,033 
Total noninterest income5,308 8,299 18,325 29,811 
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits21,538 22,145 60,362 63,790 
Premises and equipment expenses3,275 3,859 9,926 11,121 
Marketing and advertising1,181 1,013 3,431 2,879 
Data processing3,445 2,886 9,054��8,451 
Legal, accounting and professional fees2,332 2,021 6,030 8,523 
FDIC insurance1,287 1,549 3,251 5,586 
Other expenses3,148 2,902 34,126 9,506 
Total noninterest expense36,206 36,375 126,180 109,856 
Income Before Income Tax Expense49,203 58,456 137,366 181,179 
Income Tax Expense11,906 14,847 38,629 46,108 
Net Income$37,297 $43,609 $98,737 $135,071 
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic$1.16 $1.36 $3.08 $4.23 
Diluted$1.16 $1.36 $3.07 $4.22 
See notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

4



EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Interest Income                
Interest and fees on loans $78,176  $69,869  $226,543  $202,002 
Interest and dividends on investment securities  3,194   2,177   8,854   7,121 
Interest on balances with other banks and short-term investments  991   376   2,084   856 
Interest on federal funds sold  9   9   27   31 
Total interest income  82,370   72,431   237,508   210,010 
Interest Expense                
Interest on deposits  7,233   4,840   19,466   13,513 
Interest on customer repurchase agreements  58   39   136   115 
Interest on short-term borrowings  164   383   441   727 
Interest on long-term borrowings  2,979   2,441   8,937   4,515 
Total interest expense  10,434   7,703   28,980   18,870 
Net Interest Income  71,936   64,728   208,528   191,140 
Provision for Credit Losses  1,921   2,288   4,884   9,219 
Net Interest Income After Provision For Credit Losses  70,015   62,440   203,644   181,921 
                 
Noninterest Income                
Service charges on deposits  1,626   1,431   4,641   4,303 
Gain on sale of loans  2,173   3,009   6,740   8,464 
Gain on sale of investment securities  11   1   542   1,123 
Increase in the cash surrender value of  bank owned life insurance  369   391   1,108   1,171 
Other income  2,605   1,573   6,846   5,209 
Total noninterest income  6,784   6,405   19,877   20,270 
Noninterest Expense                
Salaries and employee benefits  16,905   17,130   50,451   49,157 
Premises and equipment expenses  3,846   3,786   11,613   11,419 
Marketing and advertising  732   857   2,873   2,551 
Data processing  2,019   1,879   6,057   5,716 
Legal, accounting and professional fees  1,240   771   3,539   2,845 
FDIC insurance  929   629   2,063   2,193 
Other expenses  3,845   3,786   12,153   11,354 
Total noninterest expense  29,516   28,838   88,749   85,235 
Income Before Income Tax Expense  47,283   40,007   134,772   116,956 
Income Tax Expense  17,409   15,484   50,109   44,966 
Net Income $29,874  $24,523  $84,663  $71,990 
                 
Earnings Per Common Share                
Basic $0.87  $0.73  $2.48  $2.14 
Diluted $0.87  $0.72  $2.47  $2.11 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Net Income $29,874  $24,523  $84,663  $71,990 
                 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:                
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale  15   (907)  1,243   4,110 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  (7)  1  (340)  (674)
Total unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities  8   (906)  903   3,436 
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives  347   1,756   1,350   (5,478)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income  (183)  (466)  (821)  911 
Total unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives  164   1,290   529   (4,567)
Other comprehensive income (loss)  172   384   1,432   (1,131)
Comprehensive Income $30,046  $24,907  $86,095  $70,859 

Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2022202120222021
Net Income$37,297 $43,609 $98,737 $135,071 
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax:
Unrealized (loss) on securities available-for-sale(60,029)(5,703)(151,453)(16,666)
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net income(3)(1,133)114 (1,534)
Total unrealized (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale(60,032)(6,836)(151,339)(18,200)
Unrealized (loss) on securities transferred to held-to-maturity (1)
— — (49,095)— 
Amortization of unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity1,762 — 3,753 — 
Total unrealized loss recognized (remaining) on investment securities held-to-maturity1,762 — (45,342)— 
Unrealized gain on derivatives— — 284 769 
Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income— — — (385)
Total unrealized gain on derivatives— — 284 384 
Other comprehensive (loss)(58,270)(6,836)(196,397)(17,816)
Comprehensive (Loss) Income$(20,973)$36,773 $(97,660)$117,255 
(1) Represents unamortized accumulated other comprehensive loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity status.

See notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.


5


EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’Shareholders' Equity(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)

                 Accumulated    
                 Other  Total 
  Common     Additional Paid  Retained  Comprehensive  Shareholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Warrant  in Capital  Earnings  Income (Loss)  Equity 
                      
Balance January 1, 2017  34,023,850  $338  $  $513,531  $331,311  $(2,381) $842,799 
                             
Net Income              84,663      84,663 
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax                 1,432   1,432 
Stock-based compensation expense           4,198   1      4,199 
Issuance of common stock related to options exercised, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes  60,925   1      258         259 
Vesting of time based stock awards issued at date of grant, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes  (16,962)  1      (2)        (1)
Vesting of performance based stock awards, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes  3,589                   
Time based stock awards granted  91,097                   
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan 11,510         631         631 
Balance September 30, 2017  34,174,009  $340  $  $518,616  $415,975  $(949) $933,982 
                             
Balance January 1, 2016  33,467,893  $331  $946  $503,529  $233,604  $191  $738,601 
                             
Net Income              71,990      71,990 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax                 (1,131)  (1,131)
Stock-based compensation expense           5,159         5,159 
Issuance of common stock related to options exercised,  23,614         282         282 
net of shares withheld for payroll taxes                      
Excess tax benefits realized from stock compensation           166         166 
Vesting of time based stock awards issued at date of grant,  (17,556)  2      (2)         
net of shares withheld for payroll taxes                     
Time based stock awards granted  104,775                   
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan  12,154         572         572 
                             
Balance September 30, 2016  33,590,880  $333  $946  $509,706  $305,594  $(940) $815,639 


Accumulated
AdditionalOther
Common Paid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholders'
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsIncome (Loss)Equity
Balance July 1, 202232,081,241 $318 $440,418 $964,353 $(152,369)$1,252,720 
Net Income— — — 37,297 — 37,297 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — — (58,270)(58,270)
Stock-based compensation expense— — 2,274 — — 2,274 
Issuance of common stock related to options exercised, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes— — — — — — 
Vesting of time-based stock awards issued at date of grant, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes(2,893)— — — — — 
Time-based stock awards granted— — — — — — 
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan3,973 — 188 — — 188 
Cash dividends declared ($0.45 per share)— — — (14,438)— (14,438)
Balance September 30, 202232,082,321 $318 $442,880 $987,212 $(210,639)$1,219,771 
Balance July 1, 202131,961,573 $316 $431,103 $870,397 $4,520 $1,306,336 
Net Income— — — 43,609 — 43,609 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax— — — — (6,836)(6,836)
Stock-based compensation expense— — 1,990 — — 1,990 
Vesting of time-based stock awards issued at date of grant, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes(2,756)— — — — — 
Time-based stock awards granted250 — — — — — 
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan— — — — — — 
Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)— — — (12,788)— (12,788)
Common stock repurchased(11,609)— (615)— — (615)
Balance September 30, 202131,947,458 $316 $432,479 $901,218 $(2,316)$1,331,697 

See notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

6



EAGLE BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity - Continued (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Accumulated
AdditionalOther
CommonPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholders'
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsIncome (Loss)Equity
Balance January 1, 202231,950,092 $316 $434,640 $930,061 $(14,242)$1,350,775 
Net Income— — — 98,737 — 98,737 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — — (196,397)(196,397)
Stock-based compensation expense— — 7,587 — — 7,587 
Issuance of common stock related to options exercised, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes3,289 — 97 — — 97 
Vesting of time-based stock awards issued at date of grant, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes(68,931)(2)— — — 
Vesting of performance-based stock awards, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes21,026 — — — — — 
Time-based stock awards granted166,471 — — — — — 
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan10,374 — 558 — — 558 
Cash dividends declared ($1.30 per share)— — — (41,586)— (41,586)
Common stock repurchased— — — — — — 
Balance September 30, 202232,082,321 $318 $442,880 $987,212 $(210,639)$1,219,771 
Balance January 1, 202131,779,663 $315 $427,016 $798,061 $15,500 $1,240,892 
Net Income— — — 135,071 — 135,071 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax— — — — (17,816)(17,816)
Stock-based compensation expense— — 5,814 — — 5,814 
Vesting of time-based stock awards issued at date of grant, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes(23,755)(1)— — — 
Vesting of performance-based stock awards, net of shares withheld for payroll taxes15,686 — — — — — — 
Time-based stock awards granted179,172 — — — — — 
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan9,767 — 327 — — 327 
Cash dividends declared ($0.60 per share)— — — (31,914)— (31,914)
Common stock repurchased(13,075)— (677)— — (677)
Balance September 30, 202131,947,458 $316 $432,479 $901,218 $(2,316)$1,331,697 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7


EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:        
Net Income $84,663  $71,990 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Provision for credit losses  4,884   9,219 
Depreciation and amortization  4,868   4,628 
Gains on sale of loans  (6,740)  (8,464)
Securities premium amortization (discount accretion), net  2,799   3,412 
Origination of loans held for sale  (481,917)  (606,213)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale  514,306   584,051 
Net increase in cash surrender value of BOLI  (1,108)  (1,171)
Decrease (increase) deferred income tax benefit  1,293   (754)
Decrease in value of other real estate owned     200 
Net loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned  301   (657)
Net gain on sale of investment securities  (542)  (1,123)
Stock-based compensation expense  4,199   5,159 
Net tax benefits from stock compensation  460    
Excess tax benefits realized from stock compensation     (166)
Increase in other assets  (23,059)  (8,590)
Increase in other liabilities  9,553   13,035 
Net cash provided by operating activities  113,960   64,556 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:        
Decrease in interest bearing deposits with other banks and short-term investments     784 
Purchases of available for sale investment securities  (144,554)  (106,163)
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities  55,732   65,727 
Proceeds from sale/call of available for sale securities  70,079   94,217 
Purchases of Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock  (27,665)  (3,017)
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock  18,285    
Net increase in loans  (408,447)  (491,720)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned  2,144   3,614 
Bank premises and equipment acquired  (2,459)  (4,836)
Net cash used in investing activities  (436,885)  (441,394)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Increase in deposits  197,838   399,705 
Increase (decrease) in customer repurchase agreements  4,693   (714)
Increase in short-term borrowings  200,000   50,000 
Increase in long-term borrowings  293   147,491 
Proceeds from exercise of equity compensation plans  257   282 
Excess tax benefits realized from stock compensation     166 
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan  631   572 
Net cash provided by financing activities  403,712   597,502 
Net Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents  80,787   220,664 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period  368,163   298,363 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $448,950  $519,027 
Supplemental Cash Flows Information:        
Interest paid $31,257  $18,196 
Income taxes paid $52,800  $47,950 
Non-Cash Investing Activities        
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned $1,145  $2,500 
Transfers from other real estate owned to loans $  $ 

Nine Months Ended September 30,
20222021
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:    
Net Income$98,737 $135,071 
Adjustments to reconcile Net Income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses730 (14,409)
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses for unfunded commitments1,316 (487)
Depreciation and amortization2,483 4,795 
Gain on sale of loans(3,168)(11,988)
Gain on mortgage servicing rights(872)— 
Securities premium amortization, net7,191 3,152 
Origination of loans held for sale(264,765)(929,090)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale305,764 975,870 
Deferred income tax expense— — 
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned(107)(148)
Net loss (gain) on sale of investment securities172 (2,058)
Net increase in cash surrender value of BOLI(1,889)(1,429)
Stock-based compensation expense7,587 5,814 
Net tax expense from stock-based compensation— — 
Increase in other assets(19,055)(29,667)
Decrease in other liabilities5,503 89,348 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities139,627 224,774 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
Purchases(414,935)(1,059,189)
Proceeds from maturities182,767 233,366 
Proceeds from sale/call6,225 164,569 
Investment securities held-to-maturity:
Purchases(290,740)— 
Proceeds from maturities82,163 — 
Proceeds from call19,944 — 
(Purchase of) proceeds from sale of Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock(8,158)6,011 
Sale of Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock— — 
Proceeds from sale of SBA PPP loans— 170,154 
Net (increase) decrease in loans(239,089)727,021 
Proceeds from sale of OREO241 — 
Net change in premises and equipment(1,518)(4,973)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(663,100)236,959 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Increase (decrease) in deposits(1,218,190)479,285 
Increase (decrease) in customer repurchase agreements(2,453)2,675 
Proceeds from short-term borrowings215,000 — 
Repayment of long-term borrowings— (200,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock— 327 
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan558 — 
Proceeds from exercise of equity compensation plans97 — 
Common stock repurchased— (677)
Cash dividends paid(41,586)(31,914)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities(1,046,574)249,696 
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents(1,570,047)711,429 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period1,714,222 1,789,055 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$144,175 $2,500,484 
8


EAGLE BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
20222021
Supplemental Cash Flows Information:
Interest paid$49,273 $36,831 
Income taxes paid$16,150 $42,986 
Non-Cash Operating Activities
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets$— $(10,168)
Non-Cash Investing Activities
Transfers of investment securities from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity$922,795 $— 
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned$475 $148 
Change in fair value of investment securities available-for-sale$973,655 $24,495 
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges$— $(516)

See notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.

 7

Consolidated Financial Statements.


9


EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (the "Parent") and its subsidiaries (the “Company”(together with the Parent, the "Company"), EagleBank (the “Bank”), Eagle Commercial Ventures, LLC (“ECV”), Eagle Insurance Services, LLC, and Bethesda Leasing, LLC, with all significant intercompany transactions eliminated.

EagleBank (the "Bank"), a Maryland chartered commercial bank, is the Parent's principal subsidiary.

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") and to general practices in the banking industry. The Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes of the Company included herein are unaudited. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021 was derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of that date. The Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals that in the opinion of management are necessary to present fairly the results for the periods presented. The amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 were derived from audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. There have been no significant changesCommission ("SEC"). In addition to the Company’s Accounting Policies as disclosedaccounting policies described below, the Company applies the accounting policies contained in Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.2021. Certain reclassifications have been made to 2021 amounts previously reported to conform to the current period2022 presentation.

These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report Reclassifications had no effect on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the remainder of the year,net income or for any other period.

shareholders' equity.

Nature of Operations

The Company, through the Bank, conducts a full service community banking business, primarily in the metropolitanNorthern Virginia, Suburban Maryland, and Washington, D.C area.D.C. The primary financial services offered by the Bank include real estate, commercial and consumer lending, as well as traditional deposit and repurchase agreement products. The Bank is also active in the origination and sale of residential mortgage loans, the origination of small business loans, and the origination, securitization and sale of FHAmultifamily Federal Housing Administration ("FHA") loans. The guaranteed portion of small business loans, guaranteed by the Small Business Administration ("SBA"), is typically sold to third party investors in a transaction apart from the loan's origination. The Bank offers its products and services through twenty-onesixteen banking offices, five lending centers and various electronicdigital capabilities, including remote deposit services and mobile banking services. Eagle Insurance Services, LLC, a subsidiary of the Bank, offers access to insurance products and services through a referral program with a third partythird-party insurance broker. Eagle Commercial Ventures, LLC,Landroval Municipal Finance, Inc., a direct subsidiary of the Company, provides subordinated financing forBank, focuses on lending to municipalities by buying debt on the acquisition, development and construction of real estate projects; these transactions involve higher levels of risk, together with commensurate higher returns. Refer to Higher Risk Lending – Revenue Recognition below.

public market as well as direct purchase issuance.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results maycould differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

Cash Flows

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, and interest bearing deposits with other banks which have an original maturity of three months or less.

Investment Securities

The Company has norecognizes acquired securities on the trade date. Investment securities comprise debt securities, which are classified depending on the Company's intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Debt securities are classified as trading, or as heldavailable-for-sale when management may have the intent to sell them prior to maturity. Securities available-for-saleDebt securities are acquiredclassified as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategyheld-to-maturity and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, current market conditions, loan demand, changes in prepayment risk and other factors. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses being reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of deferred income tax. Realized gainsamortized cost when management has the positive intent and losses, using the specific identification method, are included as a separate component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

ability to hold them to maturity.

Premiums and discounts on investment securities held-to-maturity, like available-for-sale securities, are amortized/amortized or accreted to the earlier of call or maturity based on expected lives, which livesinclude prepayment adjustments and call optionality.

Transfers of Investment Securities from Available-for-Sale to Held-to-Maturity
Transfers of debt securities into the held-to-maturity category from the available-for-sale category are made at amortized cost, net of unrealized gain or loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at the date of transfer. The unrealized holding gain or loss at the date of transfer is retained in other comprehensive income and in the carrying value of the held-to-maturity securities. Such amounts are amortized over the remaining life of the security.
10


Loans
Loans held for investment are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized deferred costs and fees. Interest income on loans is recognized at the contractual rate on the principal amounts outstanding. Loan origination fees, net of direct loan origination costs, and commitment fees are deferred and amortized on the interest method over the term of the loan.
Past due loans are placed on nonaccrual status when there is a clear indication that the borrower's cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due. Generally, this conclusion is reached when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed through interest income. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the remaining book balance of the asset is deemed to be collectible. If collectability is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. A loan is placed back on accrual status when both principal and interest are current and it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
The allowance for credit losses - loans ("ACL") is an estimate of the expected credit losses in the loans held for investment portfolio.
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 326, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses" requires that an estimate of current expected credit losses ("CECL") be immediately recognized and reevaluated over the contractual life of the financial asset. The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans, or portions thereof, are charged off against the allowance when they are deemed uncollectible. Expected recoveries are recorded to the extent they do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.
Reserves on loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis (e.g., nonaccrual loans, TDRs). Nonaccrual loans are specifically reviewed for loss potential and when deemed appropriate are assigned a reserve based on an individual evaluation. The remainder of the portfolio, representing all loans not evaluated individually for impairment, is segregated by call report codes and a loan-level probability of default ("PD") / Loss Given Default ("LGD") cash flow method is applied using an exposure at default ("EAD") model. These historical loss rates are then modified to incorporate our reasonable and supportable forecast of future losses at the portfolio segment level, as well as any necessary qualitative adjustments.
The Company uses regression analysis of historical internal and peer data provided by a third-party service provider (as Company loss data is insufficient) to determine suitable credit loss drivers to utilize when modeling lifetime PD and LGD. This analysis also determines how expected PD will be impacted by different forecasted levels of the loss drivers.
A similar process is employed to calculate a reserve assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and any needed reserve is recorded in reserve for unfunded commitments (“RUC”) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For periods beyond which we are able to develop reasonable and supportable forecasts, we revert to the historical loss rate on a straight-line basis over a twelve-month period.
For each of these loan segments, the Company generates cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speeds, PD rates, and LGD rates. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds is based on prepaymenthistorical internal data. EAD is based on each instrument's underlying amortization schedule in order to estimate the bank's expected credit loss exposure at the time of the borrower's potential default.
For our cash flow model, management utilizes and forecasts regional unemployment by using a national forecast and estimating a regional adjustment based on historical differences between the two as the loss driver over our reasonable and supportable period of 18 months and reverts back to a historical loss rate over twelve months on a straight-line basis over the loan's remaining maturity. Management leverages economic projections from reputable and independent third parties to inform its loss driver forecasts over the forecast period.
11


In addition to the quantitative model and individual evaluation conducted in connection with CECL, the Company applies qualitative and environmental factors into its methodology for the calculation of its ACL for its loan portfolio. The factors include: (i) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio; (ii) changes in the volume and severity of past due financial assets and the volume and severity of adversely classified assets; (iii) changes in the value of underlying collateral for loans not individually evaluated; (iv) changes in lending policies and procedures; (v) changes in the quality of credit review function; (vi) changes in lending management and staff; (vii) concentrations of credit; (viii) other external factors (competition, legal, regulatory, etc.); and (ix) changes in national, regional, and local economic and business conditions. The Company's quantitative model may reflect assumptions by management that are not covered by the qualitative and call optionalityenvironmental factors. The Company reevaluates the qualitative and environmental factors on a quarterly basis.
While our methodology in establishing the ACL attributes portions of the ACL and RUC to the separate loan pools or segments, the entire ACL and RUC is available to absorb credit losses expected in the total loan portfolio and total amount of unfunded credit commitments, respectively. Portfolio segments are used to pool loans with similar risk characteristics and align with our methodology for measuring expected credit losses.
A summary of our primary portfolio segments is as follows:
Commercial. The commercial loan portfolio comprises lines of credit and term loans for working capital, equipment, and other business assets across a variety of industries. These loans are used for general corporate purposes including financing working capital, internal growth, and acquisitions; and are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other assets of our clients' businesses.
Income producing commercial real estate. Income producing commercial real estate loans comprise permanent and bridge financing provided to professional real estate owners/managers of commercial and residential real estate projects and properties who have a demonstrated record of past success with similar properties. Collateral properties include apartment buildings, office buildings, hotels, mixed-use buildings, retail, data centers, warehouse, and shopping centers. The primary source of repayment on these loans is generally expected to come from lease or operation of the real property collateral. Income producing commercial real estate loans are impacted by fluctuation in collateral values, as well as rental demand and rates.
Owner occupied – commercial real estate. The owner occupied commercial real estate portfolio comprises permanent financing provided to operating companies and their related entities for the purchase or refinance of real property wherein their business operates. Collateral properties include industrial property, office buildings, religious facilities, mixed-use property, health care and educational facilities.
Real estate mortgage – residential. Real estate mortgage residential loans comprise consumer mortgages for the purpose of purchasing or refinancing first lien real estate loans secured by primary-residence, second-home, and rental residential real property.
Construction – commercial and residential. The construction commercial and residential loan portfolio comprises loans made to builders and developers of commercial and residential property, for both renovation, new construction, and development projects. Collateral properties include apartment buildings, mixed use property, residential condominiums, single and 1-4 residential property, and office buildings. The primary source of repayment on these loans is expected to come from the sale, permanent financing, or lease of the real property collateral. Construction loans are impacted by fluctuations in collateral values and the ability of the borrower or ultimate purchaser to obtain permanent financing.
Construction – commercial and industrial ("C&I") (owner occupied). The construction C&I (owner occupied) portfolio comprises loans to operating companies and their related entities for new construction or renovation of the real or leased property in which they operate. Generally these loans contain provisions for conversion to an owner occupied commercial real estate loan or to a commercial loan after completion of construction. Collateral properties include industrial, healthcare, religious facilities, restaurants, and office buildings.
Home equity. The home equity portfolio comprises consumer lines of credit and loans secured by subordinate liens on residential real property.
Other consumer. The other consumer portfolio comprises consumer purpose loans not secured by real property, including personal lines of credit and loans, overdraft lines, and vehicle loans. This category also includes other loan items such as overdrawn deposit accounts as well as loans and loan payments in process.
12


We have several pass credit grades that are assigned to loans based on varying levels of risk, ranging from credits that are secured by cash or marketable securities, to watch credits which have all the characteristics of an acceptable credit risk but warrant more than the normal level of monitoring. Special mention loans are those that are currently protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower, but that are potentially weak and constitute an additional credit risk. These loans have the potential to deteriorate to a substandard grade due to the existence of financial or administrative deficiencies. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardizes the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if any. Declinesthe deficiencies are not corrected. Some substandard loans are inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower and of the collateral pledged and may be considered impaired. Substandard loans can be accruing or can be on nonaccrual depending on the circumstances of the individual loans.
Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in substandard loans with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection in full highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high. All doubtful loans are on nonaccrual.
Classified loans represent the sum of loans graded substandard and doubtful.
The methodology used in the estimation of the allowance, which is performed at least quarterly, is designed to be dynamic and responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality and forecasted economic conditions. Changes are reflected in the allowance on collectively assessed and individually assessed loans as the collectability of classified loans is evaluated with new information. As our portfolio has matured, historical loss ratios have been closely monitored. The review of the appropriateness of the allowance is performed by executive management and presented to management committees, Credit Oversight Committee, the Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors. The committees' reports to the Board are part of the Board review on a quarterly basis of our consolidated financial statements.
When management determines that foreclosure is probable, and for certain collateral-dependent loans where foreclosure is not considered probable, expected credit losses are based on the estimated fair value of the collateral adjusted for selling costs, when appropriate. A loan is considered collateral-dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral.
Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals and modifications unless management has a reasonable expectation that a loan will be in a trouble debt restructuring.
We do not measure an ACL on accrued interest receivable balances because these balances are written off in a timely manner as a reduction to interest income when loans are placed on nonaccrual status.
Collateral Dependent Financial Assets
Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. For collateral dependent financial assets where the Company has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company expects repayment of the financial asset to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of individual available-for-sale securities below theirthe collateral and the amortized cost that are other-than-temporary in nature result in write-downsbasis of the asset as of the measurement date. When repayment is expected to be from the operation of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the financial asset exceeds the net present value ("NPV") from the operation of the collateral. When repayment is expected to be from the sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the financial asset exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated cost to sell. The ACL may be zero if the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date exceeds the amortized cost basis of the financial asset.
A loan that has been modified or renewed is considered a TDR when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made for the borrower's benefit that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or transaction with similar credit risk characteristics. The Company's ACL reflects all effects of a TDR when an individual asset is specifically identified as a reasonably expected TDR. The Company has determined that a TDR is reasonably expected no later than the point when the lender concludes that modification is the best course of action and it is at least reasonably possible that the troubled borrower will accept some form of concession from the lender to avoid a default. Reasonably expected TDRs and executed non-performing TDRs are evaluated individually to determine the required ACL.
13


Allowance for Credit Losses - Securities
The Company utilizes ASC 326 to evaluate its available-for-sale ("AFS") and held-to-maturity ("HTM") debt security portfolio for expected credit losses. For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company first assesses whether it intends to theirsell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either criterion is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value. Factors affectingvalue through income. For AFS debt securities that do not meet the determination ofaforementioned criteria, the Company evaluates whether other-than-temporary impairmentthe decline in fair value has occurred include a downgradingresulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a significant deterioration incredit loss exists, the financial conditionpresent value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security is compared to the amortized cost basis of the issuer, orsecurity. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a change in management’s intentcredit loss exists and ability to hold a securityan ACL is recorded for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Management systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines inthe credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value onis less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an ACL is recognized in other comprehensive income, as a quarterly basis. This analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include the: (1) duration and magnitude of the decline in value; (2) financial condition of the issuer or issuers; and (3) structure of the security.

non-credit-related impairment.

The entire amount of an impairment loss is recognized in earnings only when: (1) the Company intends to sell the security; or (2) it is more likely than not that the Company will have to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. In all other situations, only the portion of the impairment loss representing the credit loss must be recognized in earnings, with the remaining portion being recognized in shareholders’shareholders' equity as comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes.

Loans Held

Changes in the allowance for Sale

The Company regularly engages in sales of residential mortgage loans held for sale and the guaranteed portion of small business loans, guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), and originated by the Bank. The Company has elected to carry loans held for sale at fair value. Fair value is derived from secondary market quotations for similar instruments. Gains andcredit losses on sales of these loans are recorded as a componentprovision for (or reversal of) credit losses. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of noninterest income inan AFS security is confirmed or when either of the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company’s current practice iscriteria regarding intent or requirement to sell residential mortgage loans heldis met. Any impairment not recorded through an allowance for sale oncredit loss is recognized in other comprehensive income as a servicing released basis, and, therefore, it has no intangible asset recorded in the normal course of business for the value of such servicing as of September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016. The sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans onnon-credit-related impairment.

We have made a servicing retained basis, in a transaction apartpolicy election to exclude accrued interest from the loan’s origination, gives rise to an excess servicing asset, which is computed on a loan by loanamortized cost basis with the unamortized amount being includedof available-for-sale debt securities and report accrued interest separately in intangibleother assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This excess servicing assetAvailable-for-sale debt securities are placed on nonaccrual status when we no longer expect to receive all contractual amounts due, which is being amortizedgenerally at 90 days past due. Accrued interest receivable is reversed against interest income when a security is placed on nonaccrual status. Accordingly, we do not recognize an allowance for credit loss against accrued interest receivable.
The Company separately evaluates its HTM investment securities for any credit losses. The Company pools like securities and calculates expected credit losses through an estimate based on a straight-line basis (with adjustment for prepayments) as an offset to servicing fees collected and is included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company enters into commitments to originate residential mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding (i.e. interest rate lock commitments). Such interest rate lock commitments on mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary market are considered to be derivatives. To protect against the price risk inherent in residential mortgage loan commitments, the Company utilizes both “best efforts” and “mandatory delivery” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loans that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments. Under a “best efforts” contract, the Company commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor and the investor commits to a price that it will purchase the loan from the Company if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. The Company protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery commitments, whereby the investor commits to purchase a loan at a price representing a premium on the day the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer/investor has assumed the interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, the Bank is not generally exposed to losses on loans sold utilizing best efforts, nor will it realize gains related to rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The market values of interest rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not readily ascertainable with precision because rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not actively traded. Because of the high correlation between rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts, no gain or loss should occur on the interest rate lock commitments. Under a “mandatory delivery” contract, the Company commits to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If the Company fails to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, it is obligated to pay the investor a “pair-off” fee, based on then-current market prices, to compensate the investor for the shortfall. The Company manages the interest rate risk on interest rate lock commitments by entering into forward sale contracts of mortgage backed securities, whereby the Company obtains the right to deliver securities to investors in the future at a specified price. Such contracts are accounted for as derivatives and are recorded at fair value in derivative assets or liabilities, carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet within other assets or other liabilities with changes in fair value recorded in other income within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment to the customer and closing and sale of the loan to an investor generally ranges from 30 to 90 days under current market conditions. The gross gains on loan sales are recognized based on new loan commitments with adjustment for price and pair-off activity. Commission expenses on loans held for sale are recognized based on loans closed.


In circumstances where the Company does not deliver the whole loan to an investor, but rather elects to retain the loan in its portfolio, the loan is transferred from held for sale to loans at fair value at date of transfer.

The Company originates a small number of FHA loans through the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Multifamily Accelerated Program (“MAP”). The Company securitizes these loans through the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) MBS I program and sells the resulting securities in the open market to authorized dealers in the normal course of business and generally retains the servicing rights. When servicing is retained on FHA loans securitized and sold, the Company computes an excess servicing asset on a loan by loan basis with the unamortized amount being included in intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Revenue represents gains from the sale of the Ginnie Mae securities and net revenues earned on the servicing of FHA loans securitizing the Ginnie Mae securities. The gains on Ginnie Mae securities include the realized and unrealized gains and losses on sales of FHA mortgage loans, as well as the changes in fair value of FHA interest rate lock commitments and FHA forward loan sale commitments. Revenue from servicing commercial FHA mortgagessecurity's credit rating, which is recognized as earned based on the specific contractual terms of the underlying servicing agreements, along with amortization of and changes in impairment of mortgage servicing rights.

Loans

Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized deferred costs and fees. Interest income on loans is accrued at the contractual rate on the principal amount outstanding. It is the Company’s policy to discontinue the accrual of interest when circumstances indicate that collection is doubtful. Deferred fees and costs are being amortized on the interest method over the term of the loan.

Management considers loans impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments according to contractual terms. Loans are evaluated for impairment in accordance with the Company’s portfolio monitoring and ongoing risk assessment procedures. Management considers the financial condition of the borrower, cash flow of the borrower, payment status of the loan, and the value of the collateral, if any, securing the loan. Generally, impaired loans do not include large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans such as residential real estate and consumer type loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment and are generally placed on nonaccrual when the loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest. Loans specifically reviewed for impairment are not considered impaired during periods of “minimal delay” in payment (90 days or less) provided eventual collection of all amounts due is expected. The impairment of a loan is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the collateral. In appropriate circumstances, interest income on impaired loans may be recognized on a cash basis.

Higher Risk Lending – Revenue Recognition

The Company had occasionally made higher risk acquisition, development, and construction (“ADC”) loans that entailed higher risks than ADC loans made following normal underwriting practices (“higher risk loan transactions”). These higher risk loan transactions were made through the Company’s subsidiary, ECV. This activity was limited as to individual transaction amount and total exposure amounts, based on capital levels, and is carefully monitored. The loans are carried on the balance sheet at amounts outstanding. ECV had three higher risk loan transactions outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, amounting to $9.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively.


Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses represents an amount which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable losses on loans and other extensions of credit that may become uncollectible. The adequacypart of the allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity securities and included in the balance of investment securities held-to-maturity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If the Company determines that a security indicates evidence of deteriorated credit quality, the security is determinedindividually-evaluated and a discounted cash flow analysis is performed and compared to the amortized cost basis.

Loan Commitments and Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit issued to meet customer financing needs. The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for off-balance sheet loan commitments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
The Company records a reserve for unfunded commitments ("RUC") on off-balance sheet credit exposures through careful and continuous review and evaluation of the loan portfolio and involves the balancing of a number of factorscharge to establish a prudent level of allowance. Among the factors considered in evaluating the adequacy of the allowanceprovision for credit losses are lending risks associated with growth and entry into new markets, loss allocations for specific credits, the level of the allowance to nonperforming loans, historical loss experience, economic conditions, portfolio trends and credit concentrations, changesexpense in the sizeCompany's Consolidated Statement of Income. The RUC on off-balance sheet credit exposures is estimated by loan segment at each balance sheet date under the current expected credit loss model using the same methodologies as portfolio loans, taking into consideration the likelihood that funding will occur, and character ofis included in the loan portfolio, and management’s judgment with respect to current and expected economic conditions and their impactRUC on the existing loan portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values. Loans or any portion thereof deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance, while recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management adjusts the levelCompany's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
14


The following table presents a breakdown of the allowance through the provision for credit losses which is recordedincluded in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the applicable periods (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)2022202120222021
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses - loans$3,046 $(8,326)$532 $(14,498)
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses - HTM debt securities(24)— 800 — 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses - AFS debt securities— 123 (602)89 
Total$3,022 $(8,203)$730 $(14,409)

These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
New Authoritative Accounting Guidance
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2022:
ASU No. 2020-06, "Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity" ("ASU 2020-06") simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current U.S. GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a current period operating expense. The allowancesingle liability instrument and more convertible preferred stock as a single equity instrument with no separate accounting for credit losses consists of allocated and unallocated components.

The components of the allowance for credit losses represent an estimation done pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 450,“Contingencies,” or ASC Topic 310,“Receivables.” Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a specific credit that management believes indicate the probability that a loss may be incurred. For potential problem credits for which specific allowance amounts have not been determined, the Company establishes allowances according to the application of credit risk factors. These factors are set by management and approved by the appropriate Board committee to reflect its assessment of the relative level of risk inherent in each risk grade. A third component of the allowance computation, termed a nonspecific or environmental factors allowance, is based upon management’s evaluation of various environmentalembedded conversion features. ASU 2020-06 removes certain settlement conditions that are not directly measured in the determination of either the specific allowance or formula allowance. Such conditions include general economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends (including trends in delinquencies and nonperforming loans expectedrequired for equity contracts to result from existing conditions), loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio categories, recent loss experience in particular loan categories, duration of the current business cycle, bank regulatory examination results, findings of outside review consultants, and management’s judgment with respect to various other conditions including credit administration and management and the quality of risk identification systems. Executive management reviews these environmental conditions quarterly, and documents the rationalequalify for all changes.

Management believes that the allowance for credit losses is adequate; however, determination of the allowance is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. Evaluation of the potential effects of these factors on estimated losses involves a high degree of uncertainty, including the strength and timing of economic cycles and concerns over the effects of a prolonged economic downturn in the current cycle. In addition, various banking agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, and independent consultants engaged by the Bank, periodically review the Bank’s loan portfolio and allowance for credit losses. Such review may result in recognition of additions to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization computed using the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes. Premises and equipment are depreciated over the useful lives of the assets, which generally range from three to seven years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, three to five years for computer software and hardware, and five to twenty years for building improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the terms of the respective leases, which may include renewal options where management has the positive intent to exercise such options, or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. The costs of major renewals and betterments are capitalized, while the costs of ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. These costs are included as a component of premises and equipment expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)

Assets acquired through loan foreclosure are held for sale and are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. The new basis is supported by appraisals that are generally no more than twelve months old. Costs after acquisition are generally expensed. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through noninterest expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in market conditions or appraised values.


Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights. Intangible assets that have finite lives, such as core deposit intangibles, are amortized over their estimated useful lives and subject to periodic impairment testing. Intangible assets (other than goodwill) are amortized to expense using accelerated or straight-line methods over their respective estimated useful lives.

Goodwill is subject to impairment testing at the reporting unit level, which must be conducted at least annually. The Company performs impairment testing during the fourth quarter of each year or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired.

The Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing updated qualitative factors, the Company determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it does not have to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit under the second step of the goodwill impairment test are judgmental and often involve the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Similarly, estimates and assumptions are used in determining the fair value of other intangible assets. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flows, market comparisons and recent transactions. These approaches use significant estimates and assumptions including projected future cash flows, discount rates reflecting the market rate of return, projected growth rates and determination and evaluation of appropriate market comparables. Based on the results of qualitative assessments of all reporting units, the Company concluded that no impairment existed at December 31, 2016. However, future events could cause the Company to conclude that goodwill or other intangibles have become impaired, which would result in recording an impairment loss. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Interest Rate Swap Derivatives

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities and through the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to certain variable rate deposits. Refer to the “Loans Held for Sale” section for a discussion on forward commitment contracts, which are also considered derivatives.

At the inception of a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative as one of three types based on the Company’s intentions and belief asscope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to likely effectiveness as a hedge. These three types are (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value hedge”), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”), or (3) an instrument with no hedging designation (“stand-alone derivative”). Regarding Interest Rate Swap Derivatives, the Company has no fair value hedges, only cash flow hedges. For a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported in other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same period(s) during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (i.e. the period when cash flows are exchanged between counterparties). For both fair value and cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not highly effective in hedging the changes in fair value or expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized immediately in current earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported currently in earnings, as noninterest income.


Net cash settlements on derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in interest income or interest expense, based onit. ASU 2020-06 also simplifies the item being hedged. Net cash settlements on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported in noninterest income. Cash flows on hedges are classified in the cash flow statement the same as the cash flows of the items being hedged.

The Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge transactions at the inception of the hedging relationship. This documentation includes linking fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, a hedged firm commitment is no longer firm, or treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative are recorded as noninterest income or expense. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of the asset or liability. When a cash flow hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transactions are still expected to occur, gains or losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods in which the hedged transactions will affect earnings.

Customer Repurchase Agreements

The Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same securities. Under these arrangements, the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase the assets. As a result, securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The agreements are entered into primarily as accommodations for large commercial deposit customers. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, while the securities underlying the securities sold under agreements to repurchase remain in the respective assets accounts and are delivered to and held as collateral by third party trustees.

Marketing and Advertising

Marketing and advertising costs are generally expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

The Company employs the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as required by ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities (i.e., temporary timing differences) and are measured at the enacted rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse. In accordance with ASC Topic 740, the Company may establish a reserve against deferred tax assets in those cases where realization is less than certain, although no such reserves exist at September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, or September 30, 2016.

Transfer of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. In certain cases, the recourse to the Bank to repurchase assets may exist but is deemed immaterial based on the specific facts and circumstances.


Earnings per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is derived by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period measured. Diluteddiluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period measured including the potential dilutive effects of common stock equivalents.

Stock-Based Compensation

In accordance with ASC Topic 718,“Compensation,” the Company records as compensation expense an amount equal to the amortization (over the remaining service period) of the fair value of option and restricted stock awards computed at the date of grant. Compensation expense on performance based grants is recorded based on the probability of achievement of the goals underlying the performance grant. Refer to Note 10 for a description of stock-based compensation awards, activity and expense.

New Authoritative Accounting Guidance

ASU 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).”In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”) jointly issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Previous revenue recognition guidance(EPS) calculation in GAAP consisted of broad revenue recognition concepts together with numerous revenue requirements for particular industries or transactions, which sometimes resulted in different accounting for economically similar transactions. In contrast, IFRS provided limited revenue recognition guidance and, consequently, could be difficult to apply to complex transactions. Accordingly, the FASB and the IASB initiated a joint project to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS that would: (1) remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements; (2) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; (3) improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets; (4) provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements; and (5) simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. To meet those objectives, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies generally will be required to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The standard was initially effective for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption was not permitted. However, in August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date” which deferred the effective date by one year (i.e., interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017). For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application.certain areas. In addition, the FASB has begunamendment updates the disclosure requirements for convertible instruments to issue targeted updates to clarify specific implementation issues of ASU 2014-09. These updates include ASU No. 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU No. 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” ASU No. 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” and ASU No. 2016-20 “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Sinceincrease the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, the Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. The Company is substantially complete with its overall assessment of revenue streams and reviewing of related contracts potentially affected by the ASU including deposit related fees, sale of OREO, interchange fees, and other fee income. The Company’s assessment suggests that adoption of this ASU should not materially change the method in which we currently recognize revenue for these revenue streams. The Company is also substantially complete with its evaluation of certain costs related to these revenue streams to determine whether such costs should be presented as expenses or contra-revenue (i.e., gross vs. net). In addition, the Company is evaluating the ASU’s expanded disclosure requirements. The Company plans to adopt ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings, if such adjustment is deemed to be material.


ASU 2016-01,“Financial Instruments—(Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments by making targeted improvements to GAAP as follows: (1) require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (2) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; (3) eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (4) eliminate the requirement forinformation transparency. For public business entities, to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (5) require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (6) require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (7) require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (8) clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for interim and annualexcluding smaller reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has performed a preliminary evaluation of the provisions of ASU No. 2016-01. Based on this evaluation, the Company has determined that ASU No. 2016-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements; however, the Company will continue to closely monitor developments and additional guidance.

ASU 2016-02,“Leases (Topic 842).” Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases): (1) a lease liability, which is the present value of a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments, and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Lessor accounting under the new guidance remains largely unchanged as it is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. Leveraged leases have been eliminated, although lessors can continue to account for existing leveraged leases using the current accounting guidance. Other limited changes were made to align lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and the new revenue recognition standard. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures will be required by lessees and lessors to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The intention is to require enough information to supplement the amounts recorded in the financial statements so that users can understand more about the nature of an entity’s leasing activities. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. All entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. They have the option to use certain relief; full retrospective application is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-02 and will be closely monitoring developments and additional guidance to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2016-09,“Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718).” ASU 2016-09 includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. Some of the key provisions of this new ASU include: (1) companies, will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement, and APIC pools will be eliminated. The guidance also eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. In addition, the guidance requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity; (2) increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. The new guidance also requires an employer to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on its statement of cash flows (prior guidance did not specify how these cash flows should be classified); and (3) permit companies to make an accounting policy election for the impact of forfeitures on the recognition of expense for share-based payment awards. Forfeitures can be estimated, as required today, or recognized when they occur. ASU 2016-09 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2017 and the adoption of this new standard (ASU 2016-09) resulted in a net $460 thousand, or $0.01 per basic common share, reduction to income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.


ASU 2016-13,“Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326).” This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. In issuing the standard, the FASB is responding to criticism that today’s guidance delays recognition of credit losses. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU No. 2016-15,“Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” FASB issued this update in August 2016. Current GAAP is unclear or does not include specific guidance on how to classify certain transactions in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how eight particular transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, provided that all of the amendments in ASU 2020-06 are adopted in the same period. Entities will be required to apply the guidance retrospectively. If it is impracticable to apply the guidance retrospectively for an issue, the amendments related to that issue would be applied prospectively. As this guidance only affects the classification within the statement of cash flows, ASU No. 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU No. 2017-04,“Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” FASB issued this update in January 2017. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. All other goodwill impairment guidance will remain largely unchanged. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for any impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company expects to early adopt upon the next goodwill impairment test in 2017. ASU No. 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2017-12,“Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities(ASU 2017-12). The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued this update in August 2017. The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. ASU 2017-12 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2020-06 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Pending Adoption:
ASU No. 2020-4, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)" ("ASU 2020-4") provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to loan and lease agreements, derivative contracts, and other transactions affected by the anticipated transition away from LIBOR toward new interest rate benchmarks. For transactions that are modified because of reference rate reform and that meet certain scope guidance (i) modifications of loan agreements should be accounted for by prospectively adjusting the effective interest rate and the modification will be considered "minor" so that any existing unamortized origination fees/costs would carry forward and continue to be amortized and (ii) modifications of lease agreements should be accounted for as a continuation of the existing agreement with early adoption, including adoption inno reassessments of the lease classification and the discount rate or remeasurements of lease payments that otherwise would be required for modifications not accounted for as separate contracts. ASU 2020-4 also provides numerous optional expedients for derivative accounting. ASU 2020-4 is effective March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2020-4 for contract modifications as of January 1, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period permitted.that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. Once elected for a Topic or an Industry Subtopic within the Codification, the amendments in this ASU must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications for that Topic or Industry Subtopic. We anticipate this ASU will simplify any modifications we execute between the selected start date (yet to be determined) and December 31, 2022 that are directly related to LIBOR transition by allowing prospective recognition of the continuation of the contract, rather than extinguishment of the old contract resulting in writing off unamortized fees/costs. We do not anticipate that the LIBOR transition or the application of this ASU will have material effects on the Company's business operations and consolidated financial statements.
15


ASU No. 2022-02, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures" ("ASU 2022-02") eliminates the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty that assess whether a modification has created a new loan. Additionally, ASU 2022-02 requires that an entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases. For entities that have adopted ASC 326, the amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company plans to adoptimpact of ASU 2017-12 on January 1, 2019. ASU 2017-12 requires2022-02 should be applied prospectively, or, for the recognition and measurement of TDRs, with a modified retrospective transition method in which the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of the change on the opening balance of each affected component of equitymethod. We are currently in the statementprocess of financial position as of the date of adoption. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, we currently expect adoption to have an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements.

evaluating this guidance.

Note 2. Cash and Due from Banks

Regulation D

The Company has deposits with other banks for derivative positions it holds, totaling $1.1 million at September 30, 2022 and $6.3 million at December 31, 2021. At September 30, 2022, the Company was entitled to receive collateral totaling $30.6 million. At December 31, 2021, the Company was required to post $2.4 million of the Federal Reserve Act requires that banks maintain noninterest reserve balancescash collateral with the Federal Reserve Bank based principally on the type and amount of their deposits. During 2017, the Bank maintained balances at the Federal Reserve sufficient to meet reserve requirements, as well as significant excess reserves, on which interest is paid.

its counterparties. See Note 6 for additional information.

Additionally, the Bank maintains interest bearinginterest-bearing balances with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") and noninterest bearingnoninterest-bearing balances with domestic correspondent banks as compensationto cover associated costs for services they provide to the Bank.

16


Note 3. Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Amortized

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company's available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities available-for-sale are summarized as follows:

             
     Gross  Gross  Estimated 
September 30, 2017 Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized  Fair 
(dollars in thousands) Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
U. S. agency securities $179,100  $342  $1,524  $177,918 
Residential mortgage backed securities  303,822   374   2,670   301,526 
Municipal bonds  61,593   1,673   119   63,147 
Corporate bonds  13,011   206      13,217 
Other equity investments  218         218 
  $557,744  $2,595  $4,313  $556,026 
                 
        Gross    Gross    Estimated 
December 31, 2016   Amortized    Unrealized    Unrealized    Fair 
(dollars in thousands)   Cost    Gains    Losses    Value 
U. S. agency securities $107,425  $519  $1,802  $106,142 
Residential mortgage backed securities  329,606   324   3,691   326,239 
Municipal bonds  94,607   1,723   400   95,930 
Corporate bonds  9,508   82   11   9,579 
Other equity investments  218         218 
  $541,364  $2,648  $5,904  $538,108 

GrossGrossAllowanceEstimated
AmortizedUnrealizedUnrealizedfor CreditFair
(dollars in thousands)CostGainsLossesLossesValue
September 30, 2022
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. treasury bonds$49,767 $— $(3,719)$— $46,048 
U.S. agency securities750,997 15 (82,684)— 668,328 
Residential mortgage-backed securities958,800 (130,442)— 828,367 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities100,278 — (6,106)— 94,172 
Municipal bonds12,030 11 (1,047)(1)10,993 
Corporate bonds2,000 — (138)(17)1,845 
Total$1,873,872 $35 $(224,136)$(18)$1,649,753 
GrossGrossEstimatedAllowance
AmortizedUnrecognizedUnrecognizedFairfor Credit
(dollars in thousands)CostGainsLossesValueLosses
September 30, 2022
Investment securities held-to-maturity:
Residential mortgage-backed securities$761,304 $— $(87,023)$674,281 $— 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities92,948 — (11,215)81,733 — 
Municipal bonds128,386 — (15,512)112,874 (16)
Corporate bonds132,248 — (12,135)120,113 (786)
Total$1,114,886 $— $(125,885)$989,001 $(802)
GrossGrossAllowanceEstimated
AmortizedUnrealizedUnrealizedfor CreditFair
(dollars in thousands)CostGainsLossesLossesValue
December 31, 2021
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. treasury bonds$49,693 $22 $(257)$— $49,458 
U.S. agency securities629,273 736 (7,622)— 622,387 
Residential mortgage-backed securities1,692,773 5,697 (20,797)— 1,677,673 
Municipal bonds141,916 3,865 (347)(3)145,431 
Corporate bonds129,012 648 (584)(617)128,459 
Total$2,642,667 $10,968 $(29,607)$(620)$2,623,408 
In addition, at September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2021 the Company held $31.0$42.3 million and $34.2 million, respectively, in equity securities in a combination of Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”)FRB and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”)FHLB stocks, which arewere required to be held for regulatory purposes and which arewere not marketable, and therefore are carried at cost.


17

Gross



The Company reassessed classification of certain investments in the first quarter of 2022 and, effective March 31, 2022, it transferred a total of $1.1 billion of mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds and corporate bonds from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity securities, including $237.0 million of securities acquired in the first quarter of 2022 for which its intention to hold to maturity was finalized. At the time of transfer, the Company reversed the allowance for credit losses associated with the available-for-sale securities through the provision for credit losses. The securities were transferred at their amortized cost basis, net of any remaining unrealized gain or loss reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. The related unrealized loss of $66.2 million was included in other comprehensive loss at the time of transfer and, as of September 30, 2022, $61.1 million remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss, to be amortized out through interest income as a yield adjustment over the remaining term of the securities. No gain or loss was recorded at the time of transfer. Subsequent to transfer, the allowance for credit losses on these securities was evaluated under the accounting policy for held-to-maturity securities.
Accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale securities totaled $4.5 million and fair value$6.0 million at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, and accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity securities totaled $3.8 million at September 30, 2022. The accrued interest on investment securities is excluded from the amortized cost of the securities and is reported in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table summarizes available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, by length of time that the individual available-for-sale securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows:

     Less than  12 Months    
     12 Months  or Greater  Total 
     Estimated     Estimated     Estimated    
September 30, 2017 Number of  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
(dollars in thousands) Securities  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
U. S. agency securities  32  $97,832  $1,101  $28,299  $423  $126,131  $1,524 
Residential mortgage backed securities  113   198,670   1,523   55,920   1,147   254,590   2,670 
Municipal bonds  5   13,301   119         13,301   119 
   150  $309,803  $2,743  $84,219  $1,570  $394,022  $4,313 
                             
        Less than    12 Months         
        12 Months    or Greater    Total 
      Estimated      Estimated      Estimated     
December 31, 2016 Number of  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
(dollars in thousands) Securities  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
U. S. agency securities  27  $88,991  $1,764  $3,768  $38  $92,759  $1,802 
Residential mortgage backed securities  112   232,347   3,110   19,402   581   251,749   3,691 
Municipal bonds  16   34,743   400         34,743   400 
Corporate bonds  2   4,998   11         4,998   11 
   157  $361,079  $5,285  $23,170  $619  $384,249  $5,904 

The unrealizedtime:


Less Than12 Months
12 Monthsor GreaterTotal
EstimatedEstimatedEstimated
Number ofFairUnrealizedFairUnrealizedFairUnrealized
(dollars in thousands)SecuritiesValueLossesValueLossesValueLosses
September 30, 2022
U.S. treasury bonds$46,048 $(3,719)$— $— $46,048 $(3,719)
U. S. agency securities84 450,079 (49,232)212,988 (33,452)663,067 (82,684)
Residential mortgage-backed securities159 581,381 (80,300)245,304 (50,142)826,685 (130,442)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities14 94,172 (6,106)— — 94,172 (6,106)
Municipal bonds8,463 (1,047)— — 8,463 (1,047)
Corporate bonds1,862 (138)— — 1,862 (138)
262 $1,182,005 $(140,542)$458,292 $(83,594)$1,640,297 $(224,136)
December 31, 2021
U.S. treasury bond$24,593 $(257)$— $— $24,593 $(257)
U. S. agency securities64 452,966 (6,256)68,977 (1,366)521,943 (7,622)
Residential mortgage-backed securities153 1,327,519 (16,841)108,061 (3,956)1,435,580 (20,797)
Municipal bonds20,181 (347)— — 20,181 (347)
Corporate bonds13 66,051 (584)— — 66,051 (584)
239 $1,891,310 $(24,285)$177,038 $(5,322)$2,068,348 $(29,607)
18


Unrealized losses that exist areat September 30, 2022 were generally the result ofattributable to changes in market interest rates and interest spread relationships since original purchases.the investment securities were originally purchased, and not due to the credit quality concerns on the investment securities. However, as of September 30, 2022, the Company determined that certain of the unrealized loss positions in available-for-sale and held-to-maturity corporate and municipal bonds were evidence of expected credit losses, and therefore, an allowance for credit losses of $18 thousand was recorded for AFS securities and $802 thousand for HTM securities. The weighted average duration of debt securities, which comprise 99.9%100% of total investment securities,securities, is relatively short at 3.54.84 years. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’ssecurity's credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. The Company does not believe that the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2017 represent an other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intendcurrently has no plans to sell the investments and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the securities before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity.

19


The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 20162021 by contractual maturity are shown in the table below. ExpectedContractual maturities for residential mortgage backedmortgage-backed securities will("MBS") are excluded as they may differ significantly from contractualexpected maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
  Amortized  Estimated  Amortized  Estimated 
(dollars in thousands) Cost  Fair Value  Cost  Fair Value 
U. S. agency securities maturing:                
One year or less $90,495  $89,503  $83,885  $82,548 
After one year through five years  74,481   74,433   20,736   20,897 
Five years through ten years  14,124   13,982   2,804   2,697 
Residential mortgage backed securities  303,822   301,526   329,606   326,239 
Municipal bonds maturing:                
One year or less  2,537   2,586   1,056   1,070 
After one year through five years  21,116   21,875   45,808   46,865 
Five years through ten years  36,868   37,493   46,668   46,839 
After ten years  1,072   1,193   1,075   1,156 
Corporate bonds                
After one year through five years  11,511   11,717   8,008   8,079 
After ten years  1,500   1,500   1,500   1,500 
Other equity investments  218   218   218   218 
  $557,744  $556,026  $541,364  $538,108 

September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
AmortizedEstimatedAmortizedEstimated
(dollars in thousands)
Cost (1)
Fair ValueCostFair Value
Investment securities available-for-sale
U.S. treasury bonds (maturing after one year through five years)$49,767 $46,048 $49,693 $49,458 
U. S. agency securities maturing:
One year or less535,826 474,498 425,597 421,347 
After one year through five years160,848 147,596 141,537 140,785 
After five years through ten years54,323 46,234 62,092 60,255 
Residential mortgage-backed securities:958,800 828,367 1,692,820 1,677,673 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities100,278 94,172 — — 
Municipal bonds maturing:
One year or less1,600 1,600 4,806 4,861 
After one year through five years1,430 1,441 25,457 26,816 
After five years through ten years9,000 7,953 97,945 99,960 
After ten years— — 13,708 13,797 
Corporate bonds maturing:
One year or less— — 18,924 18,991 
After one year through five years2,000 1,862 54,630 54,833 
After five years through ten years— — 55,458 55,252 
Allowance for credit losses— (18)— (620)
1,873,872 1,649,753 2,642,667 2,623,408 
Investment securities held-to-maturity
Residential mortgage-backed securities:761,304 674,281 — — 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities92,948 81,733 — — 
Municipal bonds maturing:
One year or less3,161 3,100 — — 
After one year through five years35,637 32,630 — — 
After five years through ten years77,278 66,457 — — 
After ten years12,310 10,687 — — 
Corporate bonds maturing:
One year or less19,553 17,364 — — 
After one year through five years89,358 82,204 — — 
After five years through ten years23,337 20,545 — — 
Allowance for credit losses(802)— — — 
1,114,084 989,001 — — 
$2,987,956 $2,638,754 $2,642,667 $2,623,408 
(1)Amortized cost for investment securities held-to-maturity is presented net of the allowance for credit losses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
20


For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022, gross realized gains on sales and calls of investments securities were $4 thousand and $16 thousand, respectively as compared to $1.5 million and $2.2 million for the same three and nine month period ended September 30, 2021. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, gross realized losses on sales of investments securities were $795$0 and $187 thousand, respectively as compared to $0 and gross realized losses on$187 thousand for the same three and nine month period for the prior year. Gross sales of investment securitiesand call proceeds were $254 thousand. For$12.6 million and $32.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, gross realized gains on sales of investments securities were $1.32022 and $85.5 million and gross realized losses on sales of investment securities were $202 thousand.


Proceeds from sales and calls of investment securities$164.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $70.1 million, andsame periods in 2016 were $94.2 million.

2021.

The carryingbook value of securities pledged as collateral for certain government deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and certain lines of credit with correspondent banks at September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2021 was $459.9 $146.1 million and $261.0 million, respectively, which iswere well in excess of required amounts in order to operationally provide significant reserve amounts for new business. As of September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2016,2021, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and U.S. agency securities, which exceeded ten percent of shareholders’shareholders' equity.

Note 4. Mortgage Banking Derivative

As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Bank enters into interest rate lock commitments, which are commitments to originate loans where the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding and the customers have locked into that interest rate. The Bank then locks in the loan and interest rate with an investor and commits to deliver the loan if settlement occurs (“best efforts”) or commits to deliver the locked loan in a binding (“mandatory”) delivery program with an investor. Certain loans under interest rate lock commitments are covered under forward sales contracts of mortgage backed securities (“MBS”). Forward sales contracts of MBS are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest rate lock commitments and commitments to deliver loans to investors are considered derivatives. The market value of interest rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not readily ascertainable with precision because they are not actively traded in stand-alone markets. The Bank determines the fair value of interest rate lock commitments and delivery contracts by measuring the fair value of the underlying asset, which is impacted by current interest rates, taking into consideration the probability that the interest rate lock commitments will close or will be funded.

Certain additional risks arise from these forward delivery contracts in that the counterparties to the contracts may not be able to meet the terms of the contracts. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to any MBS to fail to meet its obligation. Additional risks inherent in mandatory delivery programs include the risk that, if the Bank does not close the loans subject to interest rate risk lock commitments, it will still be obligated to deliver MBS to the counterparty under the forward sales agreement. Should this be required, the Bank could incur significant costs in acquiring replacement loans or MBS and such costs could have an adverse effect on mortgage banking operations.

The fair value of the mortgage banking derivatives is recorded as a freestanding asset or liability with the change in value being recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

At September 30, 2017 the Bank had mortgage banking derivative financial instruments with a notional value of $59.6 million related to its forward contracts as compared to $81.7 million at September 30, 2016. The fair value of these mortgage banking derivative instruments at September 30, 2017 was $63 thousand included in other assets and $36 thousand included in other liabilities as compared to $217 thousand included in other assets and $222 thousand included in other liabilities at September 30, 2016.

Included in other noninterest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was a net gain of $71 thousand and a net gain of $335 thousand, relating to mortgage banking derivative instruments as compared to a net loss of $46 thousand and a net gain of $274 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The amount included in other noninterest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 pertaining to its mortgage banking hedging activities was a net realized loss of $14 thousand and $912 thousand as compared to a net realized gain of $151 thousand and net unrealized loss of $156 thousand for the same periods in September 30, 2016.

Note 5.4. Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

The Bank makes loans to customers primarily in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and surrounding communities. A substantial portion of the Bank’sBank's loan portfolio consists of loans to businesses secured by real estate and other business assets.


Loans, net of unamortized net deferred fees, at September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2016, and September 30, 20162021 are summarized by type as follows:

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
(dollars in thousands) Amount  %  Amount  %  Amount  % 
Commercial $1,244,184   20% $1,200,728   21% $1,130,042   21%
Income producing - commercial real estate  2,898,948   48%  2,509,517   44%  2,551,186   46%
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  749,580   12%  640,870   12%  590,427   11%
Real estate mortgage - residential  109,460   2%  152,748   3%  154,439   3%
Construction - commercial and residential*  915,493   15%  932,531   16%  838,137   15%
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)  55,828   1%  126,038   2%  104,676   2%
Home equity  101,898   2%  105,096   2%  106,856   2%
Other consumer  8,813      10,365      6,212    
Total loans  6,084,204   100%  5,677,893   100%  5,481,975   100%
Less: allowance for credit losses  (62,967)      (59,074)      (56,864)    
Net loans $6,021,237      $5,618,819      $5,425,111     

*Includes land loans.

September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands, except amounts in the footnote)Amount%Amount%
Commercial$1,415,998 19 %$1,354,317 19 %
PPP loans7,241 — %51,105 %
Income-producing - commercial real estate3,668,720 50 %3,385,298 48 %
Owner-occupied - commercial real estate1,091,283 15 %1,087,776 15 %
Real estate mortgage - residential71,731 %73,966 %
Construction - commercial and residential858,100 12 %896,319 13 %
Construction - C&I (owner-occupied)139,238 %159,579 %
Home equity51,396 %55,811 %
Other consumer791 — 1,427 — 
Total loans7,304,498 100 %7,065,598 100 %
Less: allowance for credit losses(75,767)(74,965)
Net loans (1)
$7,228,731 $6,990,633 

(1)Excludes accrued interest receivable of $37.1 million and $38.6 million at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, which were recorded in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Unamortized net deferred fees amounted to $23.3 million, $22.3$27.4 million and $20.9$26.9 million at September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2016, and September 30, 2016,2021, respectively.

As of September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2016,2021, the Bank serviced $176.5$362.7 million and $128.8$351.1 million, respectively, of multifamily FHA loans, SBA loans and other loan participations whichthat are not reflected as loan balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Loan Origination / Risk Management

The Company’s goal is to mitigate risks in the event of unforeseen threats to the loan portfolio as a result of economic downturn or other negative influences. Plans for mitigating inherent risks in managing loan assets include: carefully enforcing loan policies and procedures, evaluating each borrower’s business plan during the underwriting process and throughout the loan term, identifying and monitoring primary and alternative sources for loan repayment, and obtaining collateral to mitigate economic loss in the event of liquidation. Specific loan reserves are established based upon credit and/or collateral risks on an individual loan basis. A risk rating system is employed to proactively estimate loss exposure and provide a measuring system for setting general and specific reserve allocations.

The composition of the Company’s loan portfolio is heavily weighted toward commercial real

Real estate both owner occupied and income producing real estate. At September 30, 2017, owner occupied - commercial real estate and construction - C&I (owner occupied) represent approximately 13% of the loan portfolio. At September 30, 2017, non-owner occupied commercial real estate and real estate construction represented approximately 63% of the loan portfolio. The combined owner occupied and commercial real estate loans represent approximately 76% of the loan portfolio. These loans are underwritten to mitigate lending risks typical of this type of loan such as declines in real estate values, changes in borrower cash flow and general economic conditions. The Bank typically requires a maximum loan to value of 80% and minimum cash flow debt service coverage of 1.15 to 1.0. Personal guarantees may be required, but may be limited. In making real estate commercial mortgage loans, the Bank generally requires that interest rates adjust not less frequently than five years.

The Company is also an active traditional commercial lender providing loans for a variety of purposes, including working capital, equipment and account receivable financing. This loan category represents approximately 20% of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 and was generally variable or adjustable rate. Commercial loans meet reasonable underwriting standards, including appropriate collateral and cash flow necessary to support debt service. Personal guarantees are generally required, but may be limited. SBA loans represent approximately 2% of the commercial loan category of loans. In originating SBA loans, the Company assumes the risk of non-payment on the unguaranteed portion of the credit. The Company generally sells the guaranteed portion of the loan generating noninterest income from the gains on sale, as well as servicing income on the portion participated. SBA loans are subject to the same cash flow analyses as other commercial loans. SBA loans are subject to a maximum loan size established by the SBA.


Approximately 2% of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 consists of home equity loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. These credits, while making up a small portion of the loan portfolio, demand the same emphasis on underwriting and credit evaluation as other types of loans advanced by the Bank.

Approximately 2% of the loan portfolio consists of residential mortgage loans. The repricing duration of these loans was 15 months. These credits represent first liens on residential property loans originated by the Bank. While the Bank’s general practice is to originate and sell (servicing released) loans made by its Residential Lending department, from time to time certain loan characteristics do not meet the requirements of third party investors and these loans are instead maintained in the Bank’s portfolio until they are resold to another investor at a later date or mature.

Loans are secured primarily by duly recorded first deeds of trust or mortgages. In some cases, the Bank may accept a recorded junior trust position. In general, borrowers will have a proven ability to build, lease, manage and/or sell a commercial or residential project and demonstrate satisfactory financial condition. Additionally, an equity contribution toward the project is customarily required.

Construction loans require that the financial condition and experience of the general contractor and major subcontractors be satisfactory to the Bank. Guaranteed, fixed pricefixed-price contracts are required whenever appropriate, along with payment and performance bonds or completion bonds for larger scale projects.

Loans intended for residential land acquisition, lot development and construction are made on the premise that the land: 1) is or will be developed for building sites for residential structures, and;and 2) will ultimately be utilized for construction or improvement of residential zoned real properties, including the creation of housing. Residential development and construction loans will finance projects such as single family subdivisions, planned unit developments, townhouses, and condominiums.

Residential land acquisition, development and construction loans generally are underwritten with a maximum term of 36 months, including extensions approved at origination.

Commercial land acquisition and construction loans are secured by real property where loan funds will be used to acquire land and to construct or improve appropriately zoned real property for the creation of income producing or owner user commercial properties. Borrowers are generally required to put equity into each project at levels determined by the appropriate Loan Committee.

approval authority. Commercial land acquisition and construction loans generally are underwritten with a maximum term of 24 months.

Substantially all construction draw requests must be presented in writing on American Institute of Architects documents and certified either by the contractor, the borrower and/or the borrower’sborrower's architect. Each draw request shall also include the borrower’sborrower's soft cost breakdown certified by the borrower or their Chief Financial Officer. Prior to an advance, the Bank or its contractor inspects the project to determine that the work has been completed, to justify the draw requisition.

Commercial permanent loans are generally secured by improved real property whichthat is generating income in the normal course of operation. Debt service coverage, assuming stabilized occupancy, must be satisfactory to support a permanent loan. The debt service coverage ratio is ordinarily at least 1.15 to 1.0. As part of the underwriting process, debt service coverage ratios are stress tested assuming a 200 basis point increase in interest rates from their current levels.

Commercial permanent loans generally are underwritten with a term not greater than 10 years or the remaining useful life of the property, whichever is lower. The preferred term is between 5 to 7 years, with amortization to a maximum of 25 years.


The Company’sCompany's loan portfolio includes ADCacquisition, development and construction ("ADC") real estate loans including both investment and owner occupiedowner-occupied projects. ADC loans amounted to $1.44$1.5 billion at September 30, 2017.2022. A portion of the ADC portfolio, both speculative and non-speculative, includes loan fundedloan-funded interest reserves at origination. ADC loans are serviced by loan fundedthat provide for the use of interest reserves and represent approximately 79%54.1% of the outstanding ADC loan portfolio at September 30, 2017.2022. The decision to establish a loan-funded interest reserve is made upon origination of the ADC loan and is based upon a number of factors considered during underwriting of the credit, including: (1) the feasibility of the project; (2) the experience of the sponsor; (3) the creditworthiness of the borrower and guarantors; (4) the borrower equity contribution; and (5) the level of collateral protection. When appropriate, an interest reserve provides an effective means of addressing the cash flow characteristics of a properly underwritten ADC loan. The Company does not significantly utilize interest reserves in other loan products. The Company recognizes that one of the risks inherent in the use of interest reserves is the potential masking of underlying problems with the project and/or the borrower’sborrower's ability to repay the loan. In order to mitigate thisthese inherent risk,risks, the Company employs a series of reporting and monitoring mechanisms on all ADC loans, whether or not an interest reserve is provided, including: (1) construction and development timelines whichthat are monitored on an ongoing basis whichand track the progress of a given project to the timeline projected at origination; (2) a construction loan administration department independent of the lending function; (3) third party independent construction loan inspection reports; (4) monthly interest reserve monitoring reports detailing the balance of the interest reserves approved at origination and the days of interest carry represented by the reserve balances as compared to the then current anticipated time to completion and/or sale of speculative projects; and (5) quarterly commercial real estate construction meetings among senior Company management, which includesinclude monitoring of current and projected real estate market conditions. If a project has not performed as expected, it is not the customary practice of the Company to increase loan fundedloan-funded interest reserves.

From time to time the Company may make loans for its own portfolio or through its higher risk loan affiliate, ECV. Such loans, which are made to finance projects (which may also be financed at the Bank level), may have higher risk characteristics than loans made by the Bank, such as lower priority interests and/or higher loan to value ratios. The Company seeks an overall financial return on these transactions commensurate with the risks and structure of each individual loan. Certain transactions may bear current interest at a rate with a significant premium to normal market rates. Other loan transactions may carry a standard rate of current interest, but also earn additional interest based on a percentage of the profits of the underlying project or a fixed accrued rate of interest.


Allowance for Credit Losses

The following tables detail activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.2021. PPP loans are excluded from these tables since they do not carry an allowance for credit loss, as these loans are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the SBA, whose guarantee is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availabilityrestrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

     Income Producing -  Owner Occupied -  Real Estate  Construction -          
     Commercial  Commercial  Mortgage  Commercial and  Home  Other    
(dollars in thousands) Commercial  Real Estate  Real Estate  Residential  Residential  Equity  Consumer  Total 
Three months ended September 30, 2017                                
Allowance for credit losses:                                
Balance at beginning of period $14,225  $23,308  $4,189  $1,081  $16,727  $1,216  $301  $61,047 
Loans charged-off  (522)           (39)     (32)  (593)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off  407   30      2   146   1   6   592 
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries  (115)  30      2   107   1   (26)  (1)
Provision for credit losses  (2,266)  (963)  1,273   (126)  4,052   (120)  71   1,921 
Ending balance $11,844  $22,375  $5,462  $957  $20,886  $1,097  $346  $62,967 
Nine months ended September 30, 2017                                
Allowance for credit losses:                                
Balance at beginning of period $14,700  $21,105  $4,010  $1,284  $16,487  $1,328  $160  $59,074 
Loans charged-off  (659)  (1,470)        (39)     (98)  (2,266)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off  675   80   2   5   491   4   18   1,275 
Net loans charged-off  16   (1,390)  2   5   452   4   (80)  (991)
Provision for credit losses  (2,872)  2,660   1,450   (332)  3,947   (235)  266   4,884 
Ending balance $11,844  $22,375  $5,462  $957  $20,886  $1,097  $346  $62,967 
As of September 30, 2017                                
Allowance for credit losses:                                
Individually evaluated for impairment $3,246  $1,378  $1,005  $  $2,900  $90  $81  $8,700 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  8,598   20,997   4,457   957   17,986   1,007   265   54,267 
Ending balance $11,844  $22,375  $5,462  $957  $20,886  $1,097  $346  $62,967 
Three months ended September 30, 2016                                
Allowance for credit losses:                                
Balance at beginning of period $13,386  $19,072  $4,202  $1,061  $17,024  $1,556  $235  $56,536 
Loans charged-off  (109)  (1,751)           (121)  (12)  (1,993)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off  7   10      2   3   3   8   33 
Net loans (charged-off) recoveries  (102)  (1,741)     2   3   (118)  (4)  (1,960)
Provision for credit losses  (523)  3,178   59   47   (513)  (69)  109   2,288 
Ending balance $12,761  $20,509  $4,261  $1,110  $16,514  $1,369  $340  $56,864 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016                                
Allowance for credit losses:                                
Balance at beginning of period $11,563  $14,122  $3,279  $1,268  $21,088  $1,292  $75  $52,687 
Loans charged-off  (2,802)  (2,342)           (217)  (37)  (5,398)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off  93   14   2   5   207   11   24   356 
Net loans charged-off  (2,709)  (2,328)  2   5   207   (206)  (13)  (5,042)
Provision for credit losses  3,907   8,715   980   (163)  (4,781)  283   278   9,219 
Ending balance $12,761  $20,509  $4,261  $1,110  $16,514  $1,369  $340  $56,864 
As of September 30, 2016                                
Allowance for credit losses:                                
Individually evaluated for impairment $1,997  $1,714  $360  $  $300  $  $100  $4,471 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  10,764   18,795   3,901   1,110   16,214   1,369   240   52,393 
Ending balance $12,761  $20,509  $4,261  $1,110  $16,514  $1,369  $340  $56,864 



(dollars in thousands)CommercialIncome-Producing Commercial Real EstateOwner-Occupied -Commercial Real EstateReal Estate Mortgage ResidentialConstruction -Commercial and ResidentialHome EquityOther ConsumerTotal
Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance at beginning of period$15,754 $34,120 $12,796 $790 $8,494 $647 $64 $72,665 
Loans charged-off(53)— — — — — (70)(123)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off152 — 25 — — — 179 
Net loans (charged-off) recovered99 — 25 — — — (68)56 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses20 2,207 (240)20 1,020 (23)42 3,046 
Ending balance$15,873 $36,327 $12,581 $810 $9,514 $624 $38 $75,767 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance at beginning of period$14,475 $38,287 $12,146 $449 $9,099 $474 $35 $74,965 
Loans charged-off(604)— (1,356)— — — (74)(2,034)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off648 — 25 — 1,627 — 2,304 
Net loans (charged-off) recovered44 — (1,331)— 1,627 — (70)270 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses1,354 (1,960)1,766 361 (1,212)150 73 532 
Ending balance$15,873 $36,327 $12,581 $810 $9,514 $624 $38 $75,767 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance at beginning of period$21,348 $45,970 $12,995 $882 $10,427 $897 $41 $92,560 
Loans charged-off(1,999)— — — — — (1)(2,000)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off81 97 — — 493 — 672 
Net loans (charged-off) recovered(1,918)97 — — 493 — — (1,328)
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses(2,503)(4,636)(1,050)172 (179)(129)(1)(8,326)
Ending balance$16,927 $41,431 $11,945 $1,054 $10,741 $768 $40 $82,906 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance at beginning of period$26,569 $55,385 $14,000 $1,020 $11,529 $1,039 $37 $109,579 
Loans charged-off(7,691)(5,216)— — (206)— (1)(13,114)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off326 97 — — 499 — 17 939 
Net loans (charged-off) recovered(7,365)(5,119)— — 293 — 16 (12,175)
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses(2,277)(8,835)(2,055)34 (1,081)(271)(13)(14,498)
Ending balance$16,927 $41,431 $11,945 $1,054 $10,741 $768 $40 $82,906 
The Company’s recorded investments infollowing table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 related to each balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology was as follows:

     Income Producing -  Owner occupied -  Real Estate  Construction -          
     Commercial  Commercial  Mortgage  Commercial and  Home  Other    
(dollars in thousands) Commercial  Real Estate  Real Estate  Residential  Residential  Equity  Consumer  Total 
                         
September 30, 2017                                
Recorded investment in loans:                                
Individually evaluated for impairment $8,309  $10,241  $6,570  $  $7,728  $594  $92  $33,534 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  1,235,875   2,888,707   743,010   109,460   963,593   101,304   8,721   6,050,670 
Ending balance $1,244,184  $2,898,948  $749,580  $109,460  $971,321  $101,898  $8,813  $6,084,204 
                                 
December 31, 2016                                
Recorded investment in loans:                                
Individually evaluated for impairment $10,437  $15,057  $2,093  $241  $6,517  $  $126  $34,471 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  1,190,291   2,494,460   638,777   152,507   1,052,052   105,096   10,239   5,643,422 
Ending balance $1,200,728  $2,509,517  $640,870  $152,748  $1,058,569  $105,096  $10,365  $5,677,893 
                                 
September 30, 2016                                
Recorded investment in loans:                                
Individually evaluated for impairment $12,448  $14,648  $2,517  $244  $4,878  $113  $  $34,848 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  1,117,594   2,536,538   587,910   154,195   937,935   106,743   6,212   5,447,127 
Ending balance $1,130,042  $2,551,186  $590,427  $154,439  $942,813  $106,856  $6,212  $5,481,975 

At September 30, 2017, nonperforming loans acquired from Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation (“Fidelity”) and Virginia Heritage Bank (“Virginia Heritage”) have a carrying value of $476 thousand and $507 thousand, and an unpaid principal balance of $533 thousand and $1.5 million, respectively, and were evaluated separately in accordance with ASC Topic 310-30,“Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.” The various impaired loans were recorded at estimated fair value with any excess being charged-off or treated as a non-accretable discount. Subsequent downward adjustments to the valuation of impaired loans acquired will result in additional loan loss provisions and related allowance for credit losses.

2021:


September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Business/OtherBusiness/Other
(dollars in thousands)AssetsReal EstateAssetsReal Estate
Commercial$1,978 $2,008 $3,098 $6,821 
PPP loans— — 1,365 — 
Income-producing - commercial real estate2,645 4,333 3,193 19,378 
Owner-occupied - commercial real estate— 19,191 — 42 
Real estate mortgage - residential— 1,698 — 1,779 
Construction - commercial and residential— — — 3,093 
Home equity— — — 366 
Total$4,623 $27,230 $7,656 $31,479 

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company uses several credit quality indicators to manage credit risk in an ongoing manner. The Company’sCompany's primary credit quality indicators are to useinform an internal credit risk rating system that categorizes loans into pass, watch, special mention, or classified categories. Credit risk ratings are applied individually to those classes of loans that have significant or unique credit characteristics that benefit from a case-by-case evaluation. These are typically loans to businesses or individuals in the classes whichthat comprise the commercial portfolio segment. Groups of loans that are underwritten and structured using standardized criteria and characteristics, such as statistical models (e.g., credit scoring or payment performance), are typically risk rated and monitored collectively. These are typically loans to individuals in the classes whichthat comprise the consumer portfolio segment.

The following are the definitions of the Company’sCompany's credit quality indicators:

Pass:
Pass:Loans in all classes that comprise the commercial and consumer portfolio segments that are not adversely rated, are contractually current as to principal and interest, and are otherwise in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management believes that there is a low likelihood of loss related to those loans that are considered pass.

Watch:Loan paying as agreed with generally acceptable asset quality; however the obligor’sobligor's performance has not met expectations. Balance sheet and/or income statement has shown deterioration to the point that the obligor could not sustain any further setbacks. Credit is expected to be strengthened through improved obligor performance and/or additional collateral within a reasonable period of time.

Special Mention:Loans in the classes that comprise the commercial portfolio segment that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’smanagement's close attention. If not addressed, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan. The special mention credit quality indicator is not used for classes of loans that comprise the consumer portfolio segment. Management believes that there is a moderate likelihood of some loss related to those loans that are considered special mention.

Classified:
Classified (a) Substandard - Loans inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard loans, does not have to exist in individual loans classified substandard.
Classified (b) Doubtful – Loans that have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the assets, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.

Classified (b) Doubtful - Loans that have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the assets, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.


The Company’sCompany's credit quality indicators are generally updated generallyannually, however,credits rated "Watch" or below are reviewed more frequently. Based on a quarterlythe most recent analysis performed, the amortized cost basis but no less frequently than annually. The following table presentsof loans by risk category, class and by credit quality indicator, the recorded investment in the Company’s loans and leasesyear of origination are as of September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016.

     Watch and        Total 
(dollars in thousands) Pass  Special Mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Loans 
                
September 30, 2017                    
Commercial $1,204,850  $31,025  $8,309  $  $1,244,184 
Income producing - commercial real estate  2,861,346   27,361   10,241      2,898,948 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  720,693   22,317   6,570      749,580 
Real estate mortgage – residential  108,797   663         109,460 
Construction - commercial and residential  963,593      7,728      971,321 
Home equity  100,618   686   594      101,898 
Other consumer  8,719   2   92      8,813 
          Total $5,968,616  $82,054  $33,534  $  $6,084,204 
                     
December 31, 2016                    
Commercial $1,160,185  $30,106  $10,437  $  $1,200,728 
Income producing - commercial real estate  2,489,407   5,053   15,057      2,509,517 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  630,827   7,950   2,093      640,870 
Real estate mortgage – residential  151,831   676   241      152,748 
Construction - commercial and residential  1,051,445   607   6,517      1,058,569 
Home equity  103,484   1,612         105,096 
Other consumer  10,237   2   126      10,365 
          Total $5,597,416  $46,006  $34,471  $  $5,677,893 
                     
September 30, 2016                    
Commercial $1,099,894  $18,599  $11,549  $  $1,130,042 
Income producing - commercial real estate  2,527,318   9,220   14,648      2,551,186 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  577,925   10,399   2,103      590,427 
Real estate mortgage – residential  153,515   680   244      154,439 
Construction - commercial and residential  937,198   737   4,878      942,813 
Home equity  105,126   1,617   113      106,856 
Other consumer  6,209   3         6,212 
          Total $5,407,185  $41,255  $33,535  $  $5,481,975 

follows:

September 30, 2022 (dollars in thousands)Prior20182019202020212022Revolving Loans Amort. Cost BasisRevolving Loans Convert. to TermTotal
Commercial
Pass$190,265 $48,254 $59,021 $64,569 $229,469 $102,904 $665,362 $8,384 $1,368,228 
Watch5,854 1,859 360 3,776 2,893 996 21,980 — 37,718 
Special Mention— 264 — — — 87 4,817 — 5,168 
Substandard1,695 366 287 — — — 1,269 1,267 4,884 
Total197,814 50,743 59,668 68,345 232,362 103,987 693,428 9,651 1,415,998 
PPP loans
Pass— — — 2,479 4,762 — — — 7,241 
Total— — — 2,479 4,762 — — — 7,241 
Income producing - commercial real estate
Pass788,336 428,086 455,202 298,741 550,777 496,371 195,569 363 3,213,445 
Watch249,570 5,223 — 35,707 — — — — 290,500 
Special Mention44,374 5,229 4,224 — — — 47,677 — 101,504 
Substandard60,626 2,645 — — — — — — 63,271 
Total1,142,906 441,183 459,426 334,448 550,777 496,371 243,246 363 3,668,720 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
Pass456,427 205,475 79,279 41,152 202,135 37,851 15,181 — 1,037,500 
Watch17,779 11,563 4,618 — — — 60 — 34,020 
Substandard19,763 — — — — — — — 19,763 
Total493,969 217,038 83,897 41,152 202,135 37,851 15,241 — 1,091,283 
Real estate mortgage - residential
Pass16,329 12,457 11,703 3,295 16,348 6,857 — — 66,989 
Watch3,044 — — — — — — — 3,044 
Substandard1,698 — — — — — — — 1,698 
Total21,071 12,457 11,703 3,295 16,348 6,857 — — 71,731 
Construction - commercial and residential
Pass42,069 71,408 98,357 180,664 156,539 139,531 123,726 — 812,294 
Watch44,409 — — — — — — 1,397 45,806 
Total86,478 71,408 98,357 180,664 156,539 139,531 123,726 1,397 858,100 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)
Pass13,935 7,289 34,322 55,777 661 6,640 6,543 — 125,167 
Watch1,036 3,254 7,480 2,301 — — — — 14,071 
Total14,971 10,543 41,802 58,078 661 6,640 6,543 — 139,238 
Home equity
Pass1,713 — — 99 548 — 47,958 724 51,042 
Watch55 — — — — — 196 — 251 
Substandard— — 42 — — — 61 — 103 
Total1,768 — 42 99 548 — 48,215 724 51,396 
Other consumer
Pass— — — — 711 13 — 728 
Watch— — — — — — 55 58 
Substandard— — — — — — — 
Total— — — — 711 73 791 
Total Recorded Investment$1,958,981 $803,372 $754,895 $688,560 $1,164,132 $791,948 $1,130,472 $12,138 7,304,498 
December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands)Prior20172018201920202021Revolving Loans Amort. Cost BasisRevolving Loans Convert. to TermTotal
Commercial
Pass$180,877 $58,693 $103,058 $90,874 $87,515 $211,563 $549,055 $6,023 $1,287,658 
Watch5,896 6,567 1,020 996 4,268 3,137 18,336 627 40,847 
Special Mention— 9,515 363 — — — 901 — 10,779 
Substandard4,205 778 1,850 437 — — 7,763 — 15,033 
Total190,978 75,553 106,291 92,307 91,783 214,700 576,055 6,650 1,354,317 
PPP loans
Pass— — — — 16,840 32,900 — — 49,740 
Substandard— — — — 1,365 — — — 1,365 
Total— — — — 18,205 32,900 — — 51,105 
Income producing - commercial real estate
Pass572,550 333,394 418,489 495,808 337,178 549,356 198,210 — 2,904,985 
Watch58,334 73,760 — 43,561 35,094 — — — 210,749 
Special Mention101,580 — 41,936 4,264 — — 47,692 — 195,472 
Substandard60,059 — 8,491 5,542 — — — — 74,092 
Total792,523 407,154 468,916 549,175 372,272 549,356 245,902 — 3,385,298 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate
Pass353,471 127,687 210,348 81,604 41,135 184,529 16,838 1,922 1,017,534 
Watch22,710 4,581 11,783 7,026 — — 62 — 46,162 
Special Mention— — — 2,122 — — — — 2,122 
Substandard21,958 — — — — — — — 21,958 
Total398,139 132,268 222,131 90,752 41,135 184,529 16,900 1,922 1,087,776 
Real estate mortgage - residential
Pass14,645 5,854 12,956 15,546 3,436 16,495 — — 68,932 
Watch3,255 — — — — — — — 3,255 
Substandard1,698 — — 81 — — — — 1,779 
Total19,598 5,854 12,956 15,627 3,436 16,495 — — 73,966 
Construction - commercial and residential
Pass32,815 139,756 171,152 142,599 160,952 71,799 127,956 1,773 848,802 
Watch506 43,918 — — — — — — 44,424 
Substandard— — — 3,093 — — — — 3,093 
Total33,321 183,674 171,152 145,692 160,952 71,799 127,956 1,773 896,319 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)
Pass19,710 1,754 25,163 39,803 61,408 768 6,648 — 155,254 
Watch680 390 3,255 — — — — — 4,325 
Total20,390 2,144 28,418 39,803 61,408 768 6,648 — 159,579 
Home equity
Pass1,474 — — — 70 702 52,077 883 55,206 
Watch193 — — — — — — — 193 
Substandard46 — — 45 — — 58 263 412 
Total1,713 — — 45 70 702 52,135 1,146 55,811 
Other consumer
Pass370 — — — — — 1,002 — 1,372 
Substandard— — — — — — 55 — 55 
Total370 — — — — — 1,057 — 1,427 
Total Recorded Investment$1,457,032 $806,647 $1,009,864 $933,401 $749,261 $1,071,249 $1,026,653 $11,491 $7,065,598 
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as

As part of the date such payments were due. LoansCompany's comprehensive loan review process, management evaluates loans that are placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s opinion,past-due 30 days or more. Management makes a thorough assessment of the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans mayconditions and circumstances surrounding each delinquent loan. The Bank's loan policy requires that loans be placed on nonaccrual if they are 90 days past-due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, Credit Administration specifically analyzes the status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. Interest income is subsequently recognized onlydevelopment and construction projects, sales activities and utilization of interest reserves in order to the extent cash payments are received in excesscarefully and prudently assess potential increased levels of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

risk requiring additional reserves.

The following table presents, by class of loan, information related to nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016.

(dollars in thousands) September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
          
Commercial $3,242  $2,490  $2,986 
Income producing - commercial real estate  880   10,539   10,098 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  6,570   2,093   2,103 
Real estate mortgage - residential  301   555   562 
Construction - commercial and residential  4,930   2,072   6,412 
Home equity  594      113 
Other consumer  92   126    
Total nonaccrual loans (1)(2) $16,609  $17,875  $22,274 

(1)Excludes troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) that were performing under their restructured terms totaling $12.3 million at September 30, 2017, as compared to $7.9 million at December 31, 2016 and $2.9 million at September 30, 2016.

(2)Gross interest income of $176 thousand and $802 thousand would have been recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, if nonaccrual loans shown above had been current and in accordance with their original terms while interest actually recorded on such loans was $31 thousand and $56 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company’s policy for placing loans on nonaccrual status.

The following table presents, by class of loan, an aging analysis and the recorded investments in loans past due as of September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2016.

  Loans  Loans  Loans        Total Recorded 
  30-59 Days  60-89 Days  90 Days or  Total Past  Current  Investment in 
(dollars in thousands) Past Due  Past Due  More Past Due  Due Loans  Loans  Loans 
                   
September 30, 2017                        
Commercial $401  $662  $3,242  $4,305  $1,239,879  $1,244,184 
Income producing - commercial real estate  3,160   770   880   4,810   2,894,138   2,898,948 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  817   3,268   6,570   10,655   738,925   749,580 
Real estate mortgage – residential  1,480   2,123   301   3,904   105,556   109,460 
Construction - commercial and residential  197      4,930   5,127   966,194   971,321 
Home equity  637   100   594   1,331   100,567   101,898 
Other consumer  21   4   92   117   8,696   8,813 
          Total $6,713  $6,927  $16,609  $30,249  $6,053,955  $6,084,204 
                         
December 31, 2016                        
Commercial $1,634  $757  $2,490  $4,881  $1,195,847  $1,200,728 
Income producing - commercial real estate  511      10,539   11,050   2,498,467   2,509,517 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  3,987   3,328   2,093   9,408   631,462   640,870 
Real estate mortgage – residential  1,015   163   555   1,733   151,015   152,748 
Construction - commercial and residential  360   1,342   2,072   3,774   1,054,795   1,058,569 
Home equity              105,096   105,096 
Other consumer  101   9   126   236   10,129   10,365 
          Total $7,608  $5,599  $17,875  $31,082  $5,646,811  $5,677,893 
                         
September 30, 2016                        
Commercial $1,173  $495  $2,986  $4,654  $1,125,388  $1,130,042 
Income producing - commercial real estate        10,098   10,098   2,541,088   2,551,186 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate     3,338   2,103   5,441   584,986   590,427 
Real estate mortgage – residential     164   562   726   153,713   154,439 
Construction - commercial and residential        6,412   6,412   936,401   942,813 
Home equity  562   620   113   1,295   105,561   106,856 
Other consumer  8   16      24   6,188   6,212 
          Total $1,743  $4,633  $22,274  $28,650  $5,453,325  $5,481,975 

Impaired Loans

Loans are considered impaired when, based on2021:

(dollars in thousands)Loans 30-59 Days Past DueLoans 60-89 Days Past DueLoans 90 Days or More Past DueTotal Past Due LoansCurrent LoansNonaccrual LoansTotal Recorded Investment in Loans
September 30, 2022
Commercial$110 $342 $— $452 $1,412,528 $3,018 $1,415,998 
PPP loans— — — — 7,241 — 7,241 
Income producing - commercial real estate155 10,978 — 11,133 3,654,942 2,645 3,668,720 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate281 — — 281 1,090,981 21 1,091,283 
Real estate mortgage - residential— — — — 69,814 1,917 71,731 
Construction - commercial and residential— 1,945 — 1,945 856,155 — 858,100 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)— 2,301 — 2,301 136,937 — 139,238 
Home equity— 55 — 55 51,341 — 51,396 
Other consumer55 — — 55 736 — 791 
Total$601 $15,621 $— $16,222 $7,280,675 $7,601 $7,304,498 
December 31, 2021
Commercial$1,462 $672 $— $2,134 $1,343,307 $8,876 $1,354,317 
PPP loans1,765 825 — 2,590 47,150 1,365 51,105 
Income producing - commercial real estate— — — — 3,371,842 13,456 3,385,298 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate419 19,108 — 19,527 1,068,207 42 1,087,776 
Real estate mortgage – residential1,372 — — 1,372 70,584 2,010 73,966 
Construction - commercial and residential— — — — 893,226 3,093 896,319 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)— — — — 159,579 — 159,579 
Home equity33 187 — 220 55,225 366 55,811 
Other consumer— — — — 1,427 — 1,427 
Total$5,051 $20,792 $— $25,843 $7,010,547 $29,208 $7,065,598 
The following presents the nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
Nonaccrual withNonaccrual withTotal
No Allowancean AllowanceNonaccrual
(dollars in thousands, except amounts in footnotes)for Credit Lossfor Credit LossLoans
September 30, 2022
Commercial$405 $2,613 $3,018 
Income producing - commercial real estate— 2,645 2,645 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate21 — 21 
Real estate mortgage - residential— 1,917 1,917 
Home equity— — — 
Total (1)(2)
$426 $7,175 $7,601 
December 31, 2021
Commercial$5,806 $3,070 $8,876 
PPP loans (3)
1,365 — 1,365 
Income producing - commercial real estate3,920 9,536 13,456 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate42 — 42 
Real estate mortgage - residential1,779 231 2,010 
Construction - commercial and residential3,093 — 3,093 
Home equity366 — 366 
Total (1)(2)
$16,371 $12,837 $29,208 

(1)Excludes TDRs that were performing under their restructured terms totaling $24.5 million and $10.2 million at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
(2)Gross interest income of $410 thousand and approximately $1.4 million would have been recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, if nonaccrual loans shown above had been current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with thetheir original contractual terms, of the loan agreement, including scheduled principalwhile $5 thousand and $23 thousand interest payments. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature andincome was actually recorded on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.


The following table presents, by class of loan, information related to impairedsuch loans for the periodsnine months ended September 30, 2017, December 31, 20162022 and September 30, 2016.

  Unpaid  Recorded  Recorded                   
  Contractual  Investment  Investment  Total     Average Recorded Investment  Interest Income Recognized 
  Principal  With No  With  Recorded  Related  Quarter  Year  Quarter  Year 
(dollars in thousands) Balance  Allowance  Allowance  Investment  Allowance  To Date  To Date  To Date  To Date 
                            
September 30, 2017                                    
Commercial $6,047  $2,363  $3,640  $6,003  $3,246  $5,977  $5,790  $31  $97 
Income producing - commercial real estate  10,092   828   9,264   10,092   1,378   10,222   11,350   121   373 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  6,890   1,612   5,278   6,890   1,005   5,623   4,182   26   46 
Real estate mortgage – residential  301   301      301      304   368       
Construction - commercial and residential  4,930   1,534   3,396   4,930   2,900   4,808   3,736      14 
Home equity  594   494   100   594   90   446   223      2 
Other consumer  92      92   92   81   93   101       
   Total $28,946  $7,132  $21,770  $28,902  $8,700  $27,473  $25,750  $178  $532 
                                     
December 31, 2016                                    
Commercial $8,296  $2,532  $3,095  $5,627  $2,671  $12,620  $12,755  $79  $191 
Income producing - commercial real estate  14,936   5,048   9,888   14,936   1,943   16,742   17,533   54   198 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  2,483   1,691   792   2,483   350   2,233   2,106      13 
Real estate mortgage – residential  555   555      555      246   249       
Construction - commercial and residential  2,072   1,535   537   2,072   522   5,091   5,174       
Home equity                 78   89       
Other consumer  126      126   126   113   42   32   2   4 
   Total $28,468  $11,361  $14,438  $25,799  $5,599  $37,052  $37,938  $135  $406 
                                     
September 30, 2016                                    
Commercial $15,517  $2,370  $10,078  $12,448  $1,997  $12,838  $12,879  $54  $112 
Income producing - commercial real estate  14,648      14,648   14,648   1,714   17,584   15,298   28   144 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  2,517      2,517   2,517   360   2,108   1,923   13   13 
Real estate mortgage – residential  244   244      244      249   271       
Construction - commercial and residential  4,878   4,340   538   4,878   300   5,146   6,542       
Home equity  113      113   113   100   117   129   2   2 
Other consumer                    6       
   Total $37,917  $6,954  $27,894  $34,848  $4,471  $38,042  $37,048  $97  $271 

2021 respectively. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company's policy for placing loans on nonaccrual status.

(3)The CARES Act created the PPP, a program designed to aid small- and medium-sized businesses through federally guaranteed loans distributed through banks. These loans are intended to guarantee payroll and other costs to help those businesses remain viable and allow their workers to pay their bills.
Modifications

A modification of a loan constitutes a TDR when athe borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes a concession. The Company offersmay offer various types of concessions when modifying a loan. Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting revolving credit lines to term loans. Additional collateral, a co-borrower, or a guarantor is often requested.
Commercial mortgage and construction loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for the remaining term of the loan, extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or substituting or adding a new borrower or guarantor. Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only payment period. As of September 30, 2017, all performing TDRs were categorized as interest-only modifications.

Loans modified in a TDR for the Company may have the financial effect of increasing the specific allowance associated with the loan. An allowance for impaired consumer and commercial loans that have been modified in a TDR is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’sloan's effective interest rate, the loan’sloan's observable market price, or the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Management exercises significant judgment in developing these estimates.


In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic impact to our customers, we implemented a short-term modification program that complied with the CARES Act and ASC 310-40 to provide temporary payment relief to those borrowers directly impacted by COVID-19 who were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. This program allowed for a deferral of payments for 90 days, which we extended for an additional 90 days for certain borrowers, for a maximum of 180 days on a cumulative and successive basis. The following table presentsdeferred payments along with interest accrued during the deferral period are due and payable on the maturity date. Additionally, none of the deferrals are reflected in the Company's asset quality measures (i.e. non-performing loans) due to the provision of the CARES Act that permits U.S. financial institutions to temporarily suspend the GAAP requirements to treat such short-term loan modifications as TDR. Similar provisions have also been confirmed by class,interagency guidance issued by the recorded investmentfederal banking agencies and confirmed with staff members of loans modifiedthe Financial Accounting Standards Board. As of September 30, 2022, substantially all of the borrowers granted deferrals under this program have returned to regular payment status.

The Company had one loan modification with a balance of $19.2 million that resulted in a TDR duringfor the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.

  For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 
       Income
Producing -
  Owner
Occupied -
  Construction -    
(dollars in thousands) Number of
Contracts
  Commercial  Commercial
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Total 
Troubled debt restructings                        
                         
Restructured accruing    $(356) $  $(23) $  $(379)
Restructured nonaccruing  2   586   (560)        26 
Total  2  $230  $(560) $(23) $  $(353)
                         
Specific allowance     $(185) $(559) $  $  $(744)
                         
Restructured and subsequently defaulted     $  $  $  $  $ 
                         
  For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 
         Income
Producing - 
  Owner
Occupied - 
  Construction -     
(dollars in thousands) Number of
Contracts
  Commercial  Commercial
Real Estate 
  Commercial
Real Estate 
  Commercial
Real Estate 
  Total 
Troubled debt restructings                        
                         
Restructured accruing  1  $801  $  $  $  $801 
Restructured nonaccruing                  
Total  1  $801  $  $  $  $801 
                         
Specific allowance     $363  $  $  $  $363 
                         
Restructured and subsequently defaulted     $  $  $  $  $ 


The following table presents by class, the recorded investment of loans modifiedthere were no loan modifications that resulted in TDRs held by the Company at September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016.

  September 30, 2017 
       Income
Producing -
  Owner
Occupied -
  Construction -    
(dollars in thousands) Number of
Contracts
  Commercial  Commercial
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Total 
Troubled debt restructings                        
                         
Restructured accruing  9  $2,761  $9,212  $320  $  $12,293 
Restructured nonaccruing  4   776   136         912 
Total  13  $3,537  $9,348  $320  $  $13,205 
                         
Specific allowance     $685  $1,341  $  $  $2,026 
                         
Restructured and subsequently defaulted     $237  $  $  $  $237 

  September 30, 2016 
       Income
Producing -
  Owner
Occupied -
  Construction -    
(dollars in thousands) Number of
Contracts
  Commercial  Commercial
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Total 
Troubled debt restructings                        
                         
Restructured accruing  7  $1,725  $742  $414  $  $2,881 
Restructured nonaccruing  2   199         4,948   5,147 
Total  9  $1,924  $742  $414  $4,948  $8,028 
                         
Specific allowance     $456  $  $  $  $456 
                         
Restructured and subsequently defaulted     $  $  $  $4,948  $4,948 

The Company had thirteen TDR’s at September 30, 2017 totaling approximately $13.2 million. Nine of these loans, totaling approximately $12.3 million, are performing under their modified terms. During the nine months of 2017, there was one default on a $237 thousand restructured loan which was charged off, as compared to the same period in 2016, which had one default on a $5.0 million restructured loan. A default is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more or it has been placed on nonaccrual. There were two nonperforming TDRs totaling $588 thousand reclassified to nonperforming loans duringfor the nine months ended September 30, 2017. There was one2021.

The Company had five TDRs at September 30, 2022 totaling approximately $24.5 million. All of these loans were performing under their modified terms as of September 30, 2022. The Company had seven TDRs at December 31, 2021, totaling $16.5 million.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, four loans that had been modified as TDRs with a balance of $30.3 million, including two that previously were on nonperforming TDR totaling $5.0status, were sold, resulting in a charge-off of $1.4 million reclassified to nonperforming loans duringin connection with the sale. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016. 2021, the collateral for one previously nonperforming restructured loan was sold, and all of the loan's principal and part of its delinquent interest were collected; and one restructured loan that was purchased as part of the 2014 acquisition of Virginia Heritage Bank was collected at its full carrying value.
For the first nine months of 2022 there were no loans that were modified as a TDR that defaulted. For the first nine months of 2021, one performing TDR loan, with a balance of $101 thousand, defaulted on its modified terms and was placed on nonaccrual status and charged off.
Commercial and consumer loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Company evaluates the loan for possible further impairment.loss. The allowance may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. There
Note 5. Leases
The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842. A lease is defined as a contract that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Substantially all of the leases in which the Company is the lessee comprise real estate property for branch offices, ATM locations, and corporate office space. Substantially all of our leases are classified as operating leases. With the adoption of ASC Topic 842, operating lease agreements were tworequired to be recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a right-of-use ("ROU") asset and a corresponding lease liability.
As of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company had $26.0 million and $30.6 million of operating lease ROU assets, respectively, and $30.8 million and $35.5 million of operating lease liabilities, respectively, on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company elects not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities arising from short-term leases, leases with initial terms of twelve months or less, or equipment leases (deemed immaterial) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The leases contain terms and conditions of options to extend or terminate the lease which are recognized as part of the ROU assets and lease liabilities when an economic benefit to exercise the option exists and there is a 90% probability that the Company will exercise the option. If these criteria are not met, the options are not included in ROU assets and lease liabilities.
As of September 30, 2022, our leases do not contain material residual value guarantees or impose restrictions or covenants related to dividends or the Company's ability to incur additional financial obligations.
21


The following table presents lease costs and other lease information.
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended
(dollars in thousands)September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Lease cost  
Operating lease cost (cost resulting from lease payments)$1,757 $1,960 $5,418 $6,132 
Variable lease cost (cost excluded from lease payments)270 205 781 678 
Sublease income(30)(117)(212)(291)
Net lease cost$1,997 $2,048 $5,987 $6,519 
Operating lease - operating cash flows (fixed payments)$1,809 $1,992 $5,551 $6,344 
(dollars in thousands)September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Operating lease right-of-use assets$26,022 $30,555 
Operating lease liabilities$30,837 $35,501 
Weighted average lease term - operating leases5.81yrs6.26yrs
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases2.95 %3.05 %

Future minimum payments for operating leases with initial or remaining terms of more than one year as of September 30, 2022 were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Twelve months ended:
September 30, 2023$1,799 
September 30, 20247,036 
September 30, 20256,292 
September 30, 20265,329 
September 30, 20274,184 
Thereafter8,475 
Total future minimum lease payments33,115 
Amounts representing interest(2,278)
Present value of net future minimum lease payments$30,837 
Note 6. Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities through the use of derivative financial instruments.
22


Mortgage Banking Derivatives
As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Bank enters into interest rate lock commitments, which are commitments to originate loans totaling $251 thousand modifiedwhere the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding and the customers have locked into that interest rate. The Bank then locks in the loan and interest rate with an investor and commits to deliver the loan if settlement occurs ("best efforts") or commits to deliver the locked loan in a TDRbinding ("mandatory") delivery program with an investor. Certain loans under interest rate lock commitments are covered under forward sales contracts of MBS. Forward sales contracts of MBS are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest rate lock commitments and commitments to deliver loans to investors are considered derivatives. The market value of interest rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not readily ascertainable with precision because they are not actively traded in stand-alone markets. The Bank determines the fair value of interest rate lock commitments and delivery contracts by measuring the fair value of the underlying asset, which is impacted by current interest rates, taking into consideration the probability that the interest rate lock commitments will close or will be funded.
Certain additional risks arise from these forward delivery contracts in that the counterparties to the contracts may not be able to meet the terms of the contracts. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to any MBS to fail to meet its obligation. Additional risks inherent in mandatory delivery programs include the risk that, if the Bank does not close the loans subject to interest rate risk lock commitments, it will still be obligated to deliver MBS to the counterparty under the forward sales agreement. Should this be required, the Bank could incur significant costs in acquiring replacement loans or MBS and such costs could have an adverse effect on mortgage banking operations.
The fair value of the mortgage banking derivatives is recorded as a freestanding asset or liability with the change in value being recognized in current earnings during the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 which had one loan totaling $801 thousand modified in a TDR.

Note 6.period of change.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Swap Derivatives

Risk

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to assist in its interest rate risk management. The Company’sCompany's objective in using interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815 is to add stability to interest expense and to better manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company entered into forward startingutilizes interest rate swaps in April 2015 as part of its interest rate risk management strategy intended to mitigate the potential risk of rising interest rates on the Bank’sBank's cost of funds. The notional amounts of the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges do not represent amounts exchanged by the counterparties, but rather, the notional amount is used to determine, along with other terms of the derivative, the amounts to be exchanged between the counterparties. The interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and involve the receipt of variable rate amounts from two counterpartiesone counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed payments beginning in April 2016.payments. The Company’sCompany's intent is to hedge its exposure to the variability in potential future interest rate conditions on existing financial instruments.


AsThe Company's derivative position is classified within Level 2 of September 30, 2017, the Company had three forward starting designatedfair value hierarchy and is valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry and that use actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers and/or non-binding broker-dealer quotations. The fair value of the derivatives is determined using discounted cash flow hedge interest rate swap transactions outstanding that had an aggregate notional amountmodels. These models' key assumptions include the contractual terms of $250 million associatedthe respective contract along with the Company’s variable rate deposits. The net unrealized gain before income tax on the swaps was $167 thousand at September 30, 2017 compared to a net unrealized loss before income tax of $692 thousand at December 31, 2016. The net unrealized gain at September 30, 2017 compared to the net unrealized loss at December 31, 2016 is due to the increase in current market expectation of short termsignificant observable inputs, including interest rates, for the remaining term of the designated cash flow hedge interest rate swap.

yield curves, nonperformance risk and volatility. See Note 10. Fair Value Measurements.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative isare initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings), net of tax, and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged transactions.
The Company recognized an immaterial amount in earnings due toCompany's sole designated cash flow hedge ineffectivenessmatured during both the nine month periods endedApril 2021. Thus, as of September 30, 20172022 and September 30, 2016.

December 31, 2021, the Company had no designated cash flow hedge interest rate swap transactions outstanding associated with the Company's variable rate deposits. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to designated cash flow hedge derivatives will bewere reclassified to interest income/expense as interest payments arewere made/received on the Company’sCompany's variable-rate assets/liabilities. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017,

23


Non-Designated Hedges
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service the Company reclassified $307 thousandprovides to certain customers. The Company executes interest rate caps and swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by offsetting derivatives that the Company executes with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate derivatives associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer derivatives and the offsetting derivatives are recognized directly in earnings.
The Company entered into credit risk participation agreements ("RPAs") with institutional counterparties, under which the Company assumes its pro-rata share of the credit exposure associated with a borrower's performance related to designated cash flow hedgeinterest rate derivative contracts. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or liability exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers' credit spread to that exposure. Total expected exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense. During the next twelve months,using observable inputs, such as yield curves and volatilities.
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company estimates (baseddefaults on existing interest rates) that $657 thousand willany of its indebtedness, then the Company could also be reclassified as an increasedeclared in interest expense.

default on its derivative obligations.

The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the interest rate swapderivative counterparty. The Company minimizes this risk by entering into derivative contracts with only large, stable financial institutions, and the Company has not experienced, and does not expect, any losses from counterparty nonperformance on the interest rate swaps.derivatives. The Company monitors counterparty risk in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 815,"Derivatives and Hedging." In addition, the interest rate swapderivative agreements contain language outlining collateral-pledging requirements for each counterparty. Collateral must be posted when the market value exceeds certain threshold limits.

The designated cash flow hedge interest rate swapderivative agreements detail: 1) that collateral be posted when the market value exceeds certain threshold limits associated with the secured party’sparty's exposure; 2) if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness (including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender), then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations; 3) if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well/adequately capitalizedwell-capitalized institution then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements.

As of September 30, 2017,

24


The table below identifies the aggregatebalance sheet category and fair value of allthe Company's designated cash flow hedge derivative contracts with credit risk contingent features (i.e., those containing collateral posting or termination provisions based on our capital status) were in a net asset position of $167 thousand (none of these contracts were in a net liability positioninstruments and non-designated hedges as of September 30, 2017). As of September 30, 2017, the2022 and December 31, 2021. The Company has a minimum collateral posting thresholdsthreshold with certain of its derivative counterparties and has posted collateral of $890 thousand against its obligations under these agreements.counterparty. If the Company had breached any provisions under the agreementsagreement at September 30, 2017,2022, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreementsagreement at the termination value.


The table below identifies the balance sheet category and fair values of the Company’s designated cash flow hedge derivative instruments as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

  Swap  Notional     Balance Sheet        
September 30, 2017 Number  Amount  Fair Value  Category Receive Rate Pay Rate  Maturity 
                    
(dollars in thousands)                       
Interest rate swap  (1) $75,000  $116  Other Assets 1 month USD-LIBOR-BBA w/ -1 day lookback +10 basis points  1.71% March 31, 2020 
Interest rate swap  (2)  100,000   (24) Other Liabilities Federal Funds Effective Rate +10 basis points  1.74% April 15, 2021 
Interest rate swap  (3)  75,000   75  Other Assets 1 month USD-LIBOR-BBA w/ -1 day lookback +10 basis points  1.92% March 31, 2022 
    Total  $250,000  $167            

  Swap  Notional     Balance Sheet        
December 31, 2016 Number  Amount  Fair Value  Category Receive Rate Pay Rate  Maturity 
                    
(dollars in thousands)                       
Interest rate swap  (1) $75,000  $(197) Other Liabilities 1 month USD-LIBOR-BBA w/ -1 day lookback +10 basis points  1.71% March 31, 2020 
Interest rate swap  (2)  100,000   (514) Other Liabilities Federal Funds Effective Rate +10 basis points  1.74% April 15, 2021 
Interest rate swap  (3)  75,000   19  Other Assets 1 month USD-LIBOR-BBA w/ -1 day lookback +10 basis points  1.92% March 31, 2022 
    Total  $250,000  $(692)           

September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Notional
Amount
Fair ValueBalance Sheet
Category
Notional
Amount
Fair ValueBalance Sheet
Category
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in an asset position
Interest rate product$316,161 $30,635 Other assets$272,825 $5,273 Other assets
Mortgage banking derivatives8,000 259 Other assets56,331 636 Other assets
$324,161 $30,894 $329,156 $5,909 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in a liability position
Interest rate product$316,161 $29,492 Other liabilities$272,825 $5,223 Other liabilities
Mortgage banking derivatives21,428 115 Other liabilities— — Other liabilities
Credit risk participation agreements26,032 Other liabilities26,417 47 Other liabilities
$363,621 29,610 $299,242 5,270 
Cash and other collateral posted(2,270)(2,930)
Net derivatives in a liability position$27,340 $2,340 
The table below presents the pre-tax net gains (losses) of the Company’sCompany's designated cash flow hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

     Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 
     Effective Portion  Ineffective Portion 
        Reclassified from AOCI  Recognized in Income 
     Amount of  into income  on Derivatives 
  Swap  Pre-tax gain (loss)    Amount of    Amount of 
  Number  Recognized in OCI  Category Gain (Loss)  Category Gain (Loss) 
                 
(dollars in thousands)                    
Interest rate swap  (1) $116   Interest Expense $(338)  Other Expense $ 
Interest rate swap  (2)  (24)  Interest Expense  (525)  Other Expense   
Interest rate swap  (3)  75   Interest Expense  (458)  Other Expense  (1)
    Total  $167    $(1,321)   $(1)

     Year Ended December 31, 2016 
     Effective Portion  Ineffective Portion 
        Reclassified from AOCI  Recognized in Income 
     Amount of  into income  on Derivatives
  Swap  Pre-tax gain (loss)    Amount of    Amount of 
  Number  Recognized in OCI  Category Gain (Loss)  Category Gain (Loss) 
                 
(dollars in thousands)                    
Interest rate swap  (1) $(197)  Interest Expense $(628)  Other Expense $ 
Interest rate swap  (2)  (514)  Interest Expense  (880)  Other Expense   
Interest rate swap  (3)  19   Interest Expense  (747)  Other Expense  1 
    Total  $(692)   $(2,255)   $1 

Balance Sheet Offsetting: Our designated cash flow hedge interest rate swap derivatives are eligible for offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are subject to master netting arrangements. Our derivative transactions with counterparties are generally executed under International Swaps and Derivative Association (“ISDA”) master agreements which include “right of set-off” provisions. In such cases there is generally a legally enforceable right to offset recognized amounts and there may be an intention to settle such amounts on a net basis. The Company generally offsets such financial instruments for financial reporting purposes.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities(dollars in thousands)            
              Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
  Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities  Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet  Net Amounts of Liabilities presented in the Balance Sheet  Financial Instruments  Cash Collateral Posted  Net Amount 
Counterparty 1 $24  $(75) $(51) $  $(560) $(611)
Counterparty 2  (116)     (116)     (330)  (446)
  $(92) $(75) $(167) $  $(890) $(1,057)

Year Ended December 31, 2016
Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities(dollars in thousands)            
              Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
  Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities  Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet  Net Amounts of Liabilities presented in the Balance Sheet  Financial Instruments  Cash Collateral Posted  Net Amount 
Counterparty 1 $514  $(19) $495  $  $(380) $115 
Counterparty 2  197      197      (170)  27 
  $711  $(19) $692  $  $(550) $142 

Note 7. Other Real Estate Owned

The activity within Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016 is presented in2021:

The Effect of Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedge Accounting on Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Amount of Gain (Loss) RecognizedAmount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
Derivatives in Subtopicin OCI on DerivativesLocation offrom AOCI into Net Income
 815-20 Hedging RelationshipsThree Months Ended September 30, Gain (Loss) RecognizedThree Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)20222021 from AOCI into Net Income20222021
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
Interest rate products$— $— Interest Expense$— $— 
Amount of Gain (Loss) RecognizedAmount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
Derivatives in Subtopicin OCI on DerivativeLocation offrom AOCI into Net Income
815-20 Hedging RelationshipsNine Months Ended September 30,Gain (Loss) RecognizedNine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)20222021from AOCI into Net Income20222021
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
Interest rate products$— $Interest Expense$— $(445)
25


The table below presents the table below. There were no residential real estate loans ineffect of the processCompany's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of foreclosure as of September 30, 2017. Forincome for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, proceeds on sale of OREO were $1.2 million2022 and $2.1 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, there were two OREO properties with a total carrying value of $1.1 million were sold for a net gain of $60 thousand. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, there were a total of three OREO properties sold for a net loss of $301 thousand.

  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
(dollars in thousands) 2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Balance beginning of period $1,394  $3,152  $2,694  $5,852 
Real estate acquired from borrowers  1,145   2,500   1,145   2,500 
Valuation allowance           (200)
Properties sold  (1,145)  (458)  (2,445)  (2,958)
Balance end of period $1,394  $5,194  $1,394  $5,194 
2021:

The Effect of Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedge Accounting on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Interest Expense on
 Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)2022202120222021
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the consolidated statements of income in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded$— $— $— $(445)
Gain or (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships in Subtopic 815-20
Interest contracts
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income$— $— $— $(445)
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income - included component$— $— $— $(445)
The Effect of Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Income
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Location of Gain (Loss) RecognizedThree Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)in Income on Derivatives2022202120222021
Interest rate productsOther income / (other expense)$837 $277 $2,299 $261 
Mortgage banking derivativesGain on sale of loans(90)1,575 (619)5,268 
Other contractsOther income / (other expense)— — — 44 
Total$747 $1,852 $1,680 $5,573 


Note 8.7. Long-Term Borrowings

The following table presents information related to the Company’sCompany's long-term borrowings as of September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016.

(dollars in thousands) September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
          
Subordinated Notes, 5.75% $70,000  $70,000  $70,000 
Subordinated Notes, 5.0%  150,000   150,000   150,000 
Less: debt issuance costs  (3,193)  (3,486)  (3,581)
Long-term borrowings $216,807  $216,514  $216,419 

2021.


(dollars in thousands)September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Subordinated Notes, 5.75%  $70,000 $70,000 
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs(237)(330)
Total$69,763 $69,670 
On August 5, 2014, the Company completed the sale of $70.0 million of its 5.75% subordinated notes, due September 1, 2024 (the “Notes”"2024 Notes"). The 2024 Notes were offered to the public at par and qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes to the fullest extent permitted under the Basel III Rule capital requirements. The net proceeds were approximately $68.8 million, which includesincluded $1.2 million in deferred financing costs, which are being amortized over the life of the 2024 Notes.

On July

26 2016, the Company completed the sale of $150.0 million of its 5.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes, due August 1, 2026 (the “2026 Notes”). The 2026 Notes were offered to the public at par and qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes to the fullest extent permitted under the Basel III Rule capital requirements. The net proceeds were approximately $147.35 million, which includes $2.6 million in deferred financing costs which are being amortized over the life of the 2026 Notes.



Note 9.8. Net Income per Common Share

The calculation of net income per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016 2021 was as follows.

  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) 2017  2016  2017  2016 
Basic:            
Net income $29,874  $24,523  $84,663  $71,990 
Average common shares outstanding  34,174   33,590   34,124   33,566 
Basic net income per common  share $0.87  $0.73  $2.48  $2.14 
                 
Diluted:                
Net income $29,874  $24,523  $84,663  $71,990 
Average common shares outstanding  34,174   33,590   34,124   33,566 
Adjustment for common share equivalents  164   597   192   596 
Average common shares outstanding-diluted  34,338   34,187   34,316   34,162 
Diluted net income per common share $0.87  $0.72  $2.47  $2.11 
                 
Anti-dilutive shares     8      8 

follows:

Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)2022202120222021
Basic:
Net income$37,297 $43,609 $98,737 $135,071 
Average common shares outstanding32,084 31,959 32,066 31,931 
Basic net income per common share$1.16 $1.36 $3.08 $4.23 
Diluted:
Net income$37,297 $43,609 $98,737 $135,071 
Average common shares outstanding32,084 31,959 32,066 31,931 
Adjustment for common share equivalents71 72 72 62 
Average common shares outstanding-diluted32,155 32,031 32,138 31,993 
Diluted net income per common share$1.16 $1.36 $3.07 $4.22 
Anti-dilutive shares— 
27


Note 10. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company maintains the 2016 Stock Plan (“2016 Plan”), the 2006 Stock Plan (“2006 Plan”) and the 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2011 ESPP”).

In connection with the acquisition of Virginia Heritage, the Company assumed the Virginia Heritage 2006 Stock Option Plan and the 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Virginia Heritage Plans”).

No additional options may be granted under the 2006 Plan or the Virginia Heritage Plans.


The Company adopted the 2016 Plan upon approval by the shareholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting held on May 12, 2016. The 2016 Plan provides directors and selected employees of the Bank, the Company and their affiliates with the opportunity to acquire shares of stock, through awards of options, time vested restricted stock, performance-based restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. Under the 2016 Plan, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were initially reserved for issuance.

For awards that are service based, compensation expense is being recognized over the service (vesting) period based on fair value, which for stock option grants is computed using the Black-Scholes model. For restricted stock awards granted under the 2006 plan, fair value is based on the average of the high and low stock price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. For restricted stock awards granted under the 2016 plan, fair value is based on the Company’s closing price on the date of grant. For awards that are performance-based, compensation expense is recorded based on the probability of achievement of the goals underlying the grant.

In February 2017, the Company awarded 91,097 shares of time vested restricted stock to senior officers, directors, and certain employees. The shares vest in three substantially equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

In February 2017, the Company awarded senior officers a targeted number of 36,523 performance vested restricted stock units (PRSUs). The vesting of PRSUs is 100% after three years with payouts based on threshold, target or maximum average performance targets over the three year period relative to a peer index. There are three performance metrics: 1) average annual earnings per share growth; 2) average annual total shareholder return; and 3) average annual return on average assets. Each metric is measured against companies in the KBW Regional Banking Index.

The Company has unvested restricted stock awards and PRSU grants of 227,324 shares at September 30, 2017. Unrecognized stock based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards totaled $9.3 million at September 30, 2017. At such date, the weighted-average period over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 2.13 years. The following tables summarize the unvested restricted stock awards at September 30, 2017 and 2016.

  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Perfomance Awards Shares  Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value  Shares  Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value 
             
Unvested at beginning  33,226  $42.60     $ 
Issued  36,523   57.49   34,957   42.60 
Forfeited  (3,097)  42.60   (1,731)  42.60 
Vested  (4,314)  54.92       
Unvested at end  62,338  $50.45   33,226  $42.60 

  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Time Vested Awards Shares  Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value  Shares  Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value 
             
Unvested at beginning  262,966  $33.60   369,093  $24.43 
Issued  91,097   62.70   104,775   46.39 
Forfeited  (1,477)  47.69   (7,815)  40.17 
Vested  (187,600)  30.07   (195,738)  22.53 
Unvested at end  164,986  $53.56   270,315  $33.87 

Below is a summary of stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The information excludes restricted stock units and awards.

  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
  Shares  Weighted-Average Exercise Price  Shares  Weighted-Average Exercise Price 
             
Beginning balance  216,859  $8.80   298,740  $9.97 
Issued        3,000   49.49 
Exercised  (64,420)  7.46   (24,458)  13.10 
Forfeited        (1,100)  15.48 
Expired        (6,637)  12.87 
Ending balance  152,439  $9.36   269,545  $10.03 

The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2017. The information excludes restricted stock units and awards.

            Weighted-Average 
Outstanding:  Stock Options  Weighted-Average  Remaining 
Range of Exercise Prices  Outstanding  Exercise Price  Contractual Life 
$5.76  $10.72   101,075  $5.76   1.26 
$10.73  $11.40   41,389   10.84   0.77 
$11.41  $24.86   3,225   22.79   6.02 
$24.87  $49.91   6,750   47.83   8.37 
       152,439  $9.36   1.54 

Exercisable:  Stock Options  Weighted-Average 
Range of Exercise Prices  Exercisable  Exercise Price 
$5.76  $10.72   66,377  $5.76 
$10.73  $11.40   41,389   10.84 
$11.41  $24.86   2,065   23.18 
$24.87  $49.91   750   49.49 
       110,581  $8.28 

The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions as shown in the table below used for grants during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. There were no grants of stock options during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

  Nine Months Ended  Years Ended December 31, 
  September 30, 2017  2016  2015 
Expected volatility  n/a   24.23%  31.21%
Weighted-Average volatility  n/a   24.23%  31.21%
Expected dividends         
Expected term (in years)  n/a   7.0   7.0 
Risk-free rate  n/a   1.37%  1.64%
Weighted-average fair value (grant date)  n/a  $14.27  $16.73 

The total intrinsic value of outstanding stock options was $8.8 million at September 30, 2017. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $3.5 million and $855 thousand, respectively. The total fair value of stock options vested was $50 thousand and $45 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options totaled $90 thousand at September 30, 2017. At such date, the weighted-average period over which this unrecognized expense was expected to be recognized was 2.09 years.

Approved by shareholders in May 2011, the 2011 ESPP reserved 550,000 shares of common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends) for issuance to employees. Whole shares are sold to participants in the plan at 85% of the lower of the stock price at the beginning or end of each quarterly offering period. The 2011 ESPP is available to all eligible employees who have completed at least one year of continuous employment, work at least 20 hours per week and at least five months a year. Participants may contribute a minimum of $10 per pay period to a maximum of $6,250 per offering period or $25,000 annually (not to exceed more than 10% of compensation per pay period). At September 30, 2017, the 2011 ESPP had 406,081 shares remaining for issuance.

Included in salaries and employee benefits in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Company recognized $4.2 million and $5.2 million in stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards.


Note 11.9. Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

The following table presents the components of other comprehensive (loss) income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.

(dollars in thousands) Before Tax  Tax Effect  Net of Tax 
          
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017            
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale $25  $10  $15 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  (11)  (4)  (7)
Total unrealized gain  14   6   8 
             
Net unrealized gain on derivatives  557   210   347 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income  (289)  (106)  (183)
Total unrealized gain  268   104   164 
             
Other Comprehensive Income $282  $110  $172 
             
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016            
Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale $(1,512) $(605) $(907)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  1     1
Total unrealized loss  (1,511)  (605)  (906)
             
Net unrealized gain on derivatives  2,927   1,171   1,756 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income  (777)  (311)  (466)
Total unrealized gain  2,150   860   1,290 
             
Other Comprehensive Income $639  $255  $384 
             
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017            
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale $2,080  $837  $1,243 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  (542)  (202)  (340)
Total unrealized gain  1,538   635   903 
             
Net unrealized gain on derivatives  2,186   836   1,350 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income  (1,308)  (487)  (821)
Total unrealized gain  878   349   529 
             
Other Comprehensive Income $2,416  $984  $1,432 
             
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016            
Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale $6,850  $2,740  $4,110 
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  (1,123)  (449)  (674)
Total unrealized gain  5,727   2,291   3,436 
             
Net unrealized loss on derivatives  (9,132)  (3,654)  (5,478)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income  (1,519)  (608)  (911)
Total unrealized loss  (7,613)  (3,046)  (4,567)
             
Other Comprehensive Loss $(1,886) $(755) $(1,131)
2021.


(dollars in thousands)Before TaxTax EffectNet of Tax
Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
Net unrealized (loss) on securities available-for-sale$(81,384)$21,355 $(60,029)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gain) loss included in net income(4)(3)
Total unrealized (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale(81,388)21,356 (60,032)
Amortization of unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity2,382 (620)1,762 
Total unrealized loss recognized on investment securities held-to-maturity2,382 (620)1,762 
Other comprehensive (loss)$(79,006)$20,736 $(58,270)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Net unrealized (loss) on securities available-for-sale$(7,682)$1,979 $(5,703)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gain) loss included in net income(1,519)386 (1,133)
Total unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available-for-sale(9,201)2,365 (6,836)
Other comprehensive (loss)$(9,201)$2,365 $(6,836)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
Net unrealized (loss) on securities available-for-sale$(205,329)$53,876 $(151,453)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net loss (gain) included in net income172 (58)114 
Total unrealized (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale(205,157)53,818 (151,339)
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities transferred to held-to-maturity(66,193)17,098 (49,095)
Amortization of unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity5,071 (1,318)3,753 
Total unrealized (loss) on investment securities held-to-maturity(61,122)15,780 (45,342)
Net unrealized gain on derivatives284 — 284 
Total unrealized gain on derivatives284 — 284 
Other comprehensive (loss)$(265,995)$69,598 $(196,397)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Net unrealized (loss) on securities available-for-sale$(22,437)$5,771 $(16,666)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gain) loss included in net income(2,058)524 (1,534)
Total unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available-for-sale(24,495)6,295 (18,200)
Net unrealized gain on derivatives1,033 (264)769 
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net income(517)132 (385)
Total unrealized gain on derivatives516 (132)384 
Other comprehensive (loss)$(23,979)$6,163 $(17,816)
(1) Represents unamortized AOCI on securities transferred to held-to-maturity status.
28


The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.

  Securities     Accumulated Other 
(dollars in thousands) Available For Sale  Derivatives  Comprehensive (Loss) Income 
          
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017            
Balance at Beginning of Period $(1,060) $(61) $(1,121)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  15   347   362 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss  (7)  (183)  (190)
Net other comprehensive income during period  8   164   172 
Balance at End of Period $(1,052) $103  $(949)
             
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016            
Balance at Beginning of Period $5,383  $(6,707) $(1,324)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications  (907)  1,756   849 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income  1  (466)  (465)
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during period  (906)  1,290   384 
Balance at End of Period $4,477  $(5,417) $(940)
             
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017            
Balance at Beginning of Period $(1,955) $(426) $(2,381)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  1,243   1,350   2,593 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss  (340)  (821)  (1,161)
Net other comprehensive income during period  903   529   1,432 
Balance at End of Period $(1,052) $103  $(949)
             
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016            
Balance at Beginning of Period $1,041  $(850) $191 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications  4,110   (5,478)  (1,368)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income  (674)  911   237 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) during period  3,436   (4,567)  (1,131)
Balance at End of Period $4,477  $(5,417) $(940)
2021.

SecuritiesSecuritiesAccumulated Other
AvailableHeld toComprehensive
(dollars in thousands)For SaleMaturityDerivativesIncome (Loss)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
Balance at beginning of period$(105,265)$(47,104)$— $(152,369)
Other comprehensive (loss) before reclassifications(60,029)— — (60,029)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(3)— — (3)
Amortization of unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity— 1,762 — 1,762 
Net other comprehensive (loss) during period(60,032)1,762 — (58,270)
Balance at end of period$(165,297)$(45,342)$— $(210,639)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Balance at beginning of period$4,804 $— $(284)$4,520 
Other comprehensive (loss) before reclassifications(5,703)— — (5,703)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1,133)— — (1,133)
Net other comprehensive (loss) during period(6,836)— — (6,836)
Balance at end of period$(2,032)$— $(284)$(2,316)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
Balance at beginning of period$(13,958)$— $(284)$(14,242)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(151,453)— 284 (151,169)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)114 — — 114 
Net unrealized (loss) on securities transferred to held-to-maturity— (49,095)— (49,095)
Amortization of unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity— 3,753 — 3,753 
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during period(151,339)(45,342)284 (196,397)
Balance at end of period$(165,297)$(45,342)$— $(210,639)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Balance at beginning of period$16,168 $— $(668)$15,500 
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(16,666)— 769 (15,897)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1,534)— (385)(1,919)
Net other comprehensive (loss) income during period(18,200)— 384 (17,816)
Balance at end of period$(2,032)$— $(284)$(2,316)

29


The following table presentstables present the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.

Details about Accumulated Other Amount Reclassified from  Affected Line Item in
Comprehensive Income Components Accumulated Other  the Statement Where
(dollars in thousands) Comprehensive (Loss) Income  Net Income is Presented
  Three Months Ended September 30,   
  2017  2016   
Realized gain on sale of investment securities $(11) $(1) Gain on sale of investment securities
Interest expense derivative deposits  (289)  (470) Interest expense on deposits
Interest expense derivative borrowings     (306) Interest expense on short-term borrowings
Income tax expense  110   311  Tax expense
Total Reclassifications for the Period $(190) $(466) Net Income
           
Details about Accumulated Other Amount Reclassified from  Affected Line Item in
Comprehensive Income Components Accumulated Other  the Statement Where
(dollars in thousands) Comprehensive (Loss) Income  Net Income is Presented
  Nine Months Ended September 30,   
   2017   2016   
Realized gain on sale of investment securities $(542) $(1,123) Gain on sale of investment securities
Interest expense derivative deposits  (1,308)  (952) Interest expense on deposits
Interest expense derivative borrowings     (567) Interest expense on short-term borrowings
Income tax expense  689   2,405  Tax expense
Total Reclassifications for the Period $(1,161) $(237) Net Income
2021.
Amount Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Details about Accumulated OtherComprehensive (Loss) IncomeAffected Line Item in
Comprehensive Loss ComponentsThree Months Ended September 30,Consolidated Statements of
(dollars in thousands)20222021Income
Realized (loss) gain on sale of investment securities$$1,519 Net gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
Income tax benefit (expense)(1)(386)Income tax expense
Total reclassifications for the periods$$1,133 
Amount Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Details about Accumulated OtherComprehensive (Loss) IncomeAffected Line Item in
Comprehensive Loss ComponentsNine Months Ended September 30,Consolidated Statements of
(dollars in thousands)20222021Income
Realized (loss) gain on sale of investment securities$(172)$2,058 Net gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
Interest income derivative deposits— 517 Interest on balances with other banks and short-term investments
Income tax benefit (expense)58 (656)Income tax expense
Total reclassifications for the periods$(114)$1,919 

Note 12.10. Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC Topic 820,"Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities; also includes certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government and agency securities actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; also includes derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with observable market inputs or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans held for sale.

Level 3Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation; also includes observable inputs for single dealer nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained interests from securitizations, and certain collateralized debt obligations.

Level 1         Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities.; also includes certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government and agency securities actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2         Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; also includes derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with observable market inputs or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans held for sale.
Level 3   Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation; also includes observable inputs for single dealer nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained interests from securitizations, and certain collateralized debt obligations.
30


Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The tabletables below presentspresent the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2016.

(dollars in thousands) Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
  Total
(Fair Value)
 
September 30, 2017                
Assets:                
Investment securities available for sale:                
U. S. agency securities $  $177,918  $  $177,918 
Residential mortgage backed securities     301,526      301,526 
Municipal bonds     63,147      63,147 
Corporate bonds     11,717   1,500   13,217 
Other equity investments        218   218 
Loans held for sale     25,980      25,980 
Mortgage banking derivatives        63   63 
Interest rate swap derivatives     191      191 
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 $  $580,479  $1,781  $582,260 
                 
Liabilities:                
Mortgage banking derivatives $  $  $36  $36 
Interest rate swap derivatives     24      24 
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 $  $24  $36  $60 
                 
December 31, 2016                
Assets:                
Investment securities available for sale:                
U. S. agency securities $  $106,142  $  $106,142 
Residential mortgage backed securities     326,239      326,239 
Municipal bonds     95,930      95,930 
Corporate bonds     8,079   1,500   9,579 
Other equity investments        218   218 
Loans held for sale     51,629      51,629 
Mortgage banking derivatives        114   114 
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 $  $588,019  $1,832  $589,851 
Liabilities:                
Mortgage banking derivatives $  $  $55  $55 
Interest rate swap derivatives     692      692 
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 $  $692  $55  $747 

2021.

SignificantSignificant
OtherOther
ObservableUnobservable
Quoted PricesInputsInputsTotal
(dollars in thousands)(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(Fair Value)
September 30, 2022
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale: 
U.S treasury bonds$— $46,048 $— $46,048 
U. S. agency securities— 668,328 — 668,328 
Residential mortgage-backed securities— 828,367 — 828,367 
Commercial mortgage-backed securities— 94,172 — 94,172 
Municipal bonds— 10,993 — 10,993 
Corporate bonds— 1,845 — 1,845 
Loans held for sale— 9,387 — 9,387 
Interest rate derivatives— 30,635 — 30,635 
Mortgage banking derivatives— — 259 259 
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2022$— $1,689,775 $259 $1,690,034 
Liabilities:
Credit risk participation agreements$— $$— $
Interest rate derivatives— 29,492 — 29,492 
Mortgage banking derivatives— — 115 115 
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2022$— $29,495 $115 $29,610 
December 31, 2021
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. treasury bonds$— $49,458 $— $49,458 
U. S. agency securities— 622,387 — 622,387 
Mortgage-backed securities— 1,677,673 — 1,677,673 
Municipal bonds— 145,431 — 145,431 
Corporate bonds— 116,459 12,000 128,459 
Loans held for sale— 47,218 — 47,218 
Interest rate caps— 5,197 — 5,197 
Mortgage banking derivatives— — 636 636 
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021$— $2,663,823 $12,636 $2,676,459 
Liabilities:
Credit risk participation agreements$— $47 $— $47 
Interest rate derivatives— 5,147 — 5,147 
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021$— $5,194 $— $5,194 
31


Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

securities available-for-sale:Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’ssecurity's credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange, Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds.Exchange. Level 2 securities includeincludes certain U.S. treasury bonds, U.S. agency debt securities, mortgage backedmortgage-backed securities issued by Government Sponsored Entities (“GSE’s”) and municipal bonds. Securities classified as Level 3 include securities in less liquid markets, the carrying amounts approximate the fair value.


Loans held for sale: The Company has elected to carry loans held for sale at fair value. This election reduces certain timing differences in the Consolidated Statement of OperationsIncome and better aligns with the management of the portfolio from a business perspective. Fair value is derived from secondary market quotations for similar instruments. Gains and losses on sales of residential mortgage loans are recorded as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.income. Gains and losses on salessale of multifamily FHA securities are recorded as a component of noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Income. Fair value is derived from secondary market quotations for similar instruments. As such, the Company classifies loans subjected to fair value adjustments as Level 2 valuation.

The following table summarizestables summarize the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance for residential real estate loans held for sale measured at fair value as of September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2016.

  September 30, 2017 
      Aggregate Unpaid     
(dollars in thousands) Fair Value  Principal Balance  Difference 
             
Residential mortgage loans held for sale $25,980  $25,473  $507 
FHA mortgage loans held for sale $  $  $ 

  December 31, 2016 
      Aggregate Unpaid     
(dollars in thousands) Fair Value  Principal Balance  Difference 
             
Residential mortgage loans held for sale $51,629  $51,021  $608 
FHA mortgage loans held for sale $  $  $ 

No2021.

Aggregate Unpaid
(dollars in thousands)Fair ValuePrincipal BalanceDifference
September 30, 2022
Loans held for sale$9,387 $9,862 $(475)
December 31, 2021
Loans held for sale$47,218 $46,623 $595 
There were no residential mortgage loans held for sale that were 90 or more days past due or on nonaccrual status as of September 30, 20172022 or December 31, 2016.

2021.

Credit risk participation agreements: The Company enters into RPAs with institutional counterparties, under which the Company assumes its pro-rata share of the credit exposure associated with a borrower's performance related to interest rate derivative contracts. The fair value of RPAs is calculated by determining the total expected asset or liability exposure of the derivatives to the borrowers and applying the borrowers' credit spread to that exposure. Total expected exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivatives, derived from using observable inputs, such as yield curves and volatilities. Accordingly, RPAs fall within Level 2.
Interest rate swap derivatives:These derivative instruments consist of forward starting The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreements,derivative agreement with an institutional counterparty, under which are accounted for asthe Company will receive cash flow hedges. The Company’s derivative position is classified within Level 2 ofif and when market rates exceed the fair value hierarchy and is valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry and that use actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers and/or non-binding broker-dealer quotations.derivatives strike rate. The fair value of the derivativesderivative cap is determined using discounted cash flow models. These models’ key assumptions includecalculated by determining the contractual termstotal expected asset or liability exposure of the respective contract along with significantderivatives. Total expected exposure incorporates both the current and potential future exposure of the derivative, derived from using observable inputs, including interest rates,such as yield curves nonperformance risk and volatility. Derivative contracts are executed with a Credit Support Annex, which is a bilateral agreement that requires collateral postings whenvolatilities. Accordingly, the market value exceeds certain threshold limits. These agreements protect the interests of the Company and its counterparties should either party suffer a credit rating deterioration.

derivative falls within Level 2.

Mortgage banking derivatives:derivatives for loans settled on a mandatory basis:The Company reliesrelied on a third-party pricing service to value its mortgage banking derivative financial assets and liabilities, which the Company classifies as a Level 3 valuation. The external valuation model to estimate the fair value of its interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale includes grouping the interest rate lock commitments by interest rate and terms, applying an estimated pull-through rate based on historical experience, and then multiplying by quoted investor prices determined to be reasonably applicable to the loan commitment groups based on interest rate, terms, and rate lock expiration dates of the loan commitment groups. The Company also relies on an external valuation model to estimate the fair value of its forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans (i.e., an estimate of what the Company would receive or pay to terminate the forward delivery contract based on market prices for similar financial instruments), which includes matching specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments against applicable investor pricing.


32



Mortgage banking derivative for loans settled best efforts basis: The significant unobservable input (Level 3) used in the fair value measurement of the Company's interest rate lock commitments is the pull through ratio, which represents the percentage of loans currently in a lock position which management estimates will ultimately close. An increase in the pull through ratio (i.e. higher percentage of loans are estimated to close) will increase the gain or loss. The pull through ratio is largely dependent on the loan processing stage that a loan is currently in. The pull through rate is computed by the Company's secondary marketing consultant using historical data and the ratio is periodically reviewed by the Company for reasonableness.
The following is a reconciliation of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3):

  Investment  Mortgage Banking    
(dollars in thousands) Securities  Derivatives  Total 
Assets:            
Beginning balance at January 1, 2017 $1,718  $114  $1,832 
Realized loss included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives     (51)  (51)
    Purchases of available-for-sale securities         
    Principal redemption         
Ending balance at September 30, 2017 $1,718  $63  $1,781 
             
Liabilities:            
Beginning balance at January 1, 2017 $  $55  $55 
Realized loss included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives     (19)  (19)
    Principal redemption         
Ending balance at September 30, 2017 $  $36  $36 

  Investment  Mortgage Banking    
(dollars in thousands) Securities  Derivatives  Total 
Assets:            
Beginning balance at January 1, 2016 $219  $24  $243 
Realized gain included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives     90   90 
    Purchases of available-for-sale securities  1,500      1,500 
    Principal redemption  (1)     (1)
Ending balance at December 31, 2016 $1,718  $114  $1,832 
             
Liabilities:            
Beginning balance at January 1, 2016 $  $30  $30 
Realized loss included in earnings - net mortgage banking derivatives     25   25 
    Principal redemption         
Ending balance at December 31, 2016 $  $55  $55 

The other equity securities classified as

Investment
SecuritiesMortgage Banking
(dollars in thousands)Available-for-SaleDerivativesTotal
Assets:      
Beginning balance at January 1, 2022$12,000 $636 $12,636 
Unrealized loss included in earnings— (377)(377)
Reclassified to investment securities held-to-maturity(12,000)— (12,000)
Ending balance at September 30, 2022$— $259 $259 
Liabilities:
Beginning balance at January 1, 2022$— $— 
Unrealized loss included in earnings115 115 
Ending balance at September 30, 2022$115 $115 
Investment
SecuritiesMortgage Banking
(dollars in thousands)Available-for-SaleDerivativesTotal
Assets:      
Beginning balance at January 1, 2021$1,500 $5,213 $6,713 
Realized loss included in earnings— (4,577)(4,577)
Reclass Level 2 to Level 312,000 — 12,000 
Principal redemption(1,500)— (1,500)
Ending balance at December 31, 2021$12,000 $636 $12,636 
For Level 3 consistassets measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis as of equity investmentsSeptember 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the significant unobservable inputs used in the form of common stock of two localfair value measurements were as follows:

September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Valuation TechniqueDescriptionRange
Weighted Average (1)
Fair Value
Weighted Average (1)
Fair Value
Mortgage banking derivativesPricing ModelPull Through Rate59.9% - 100.0%83.18 %$259 86.40 %$636 
(1) Unobservable inputs for mortgage banking companies which are not publicly traded, and for which the carrying amount approximates fair value.

derivatives were weighted by loan amount.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the following is a general description of the methods used to value such assets.

Impaired loans: The Company considers a loan impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the note agreement, including both principal and interest. Management has determined that nonaccrual loans and loans that have had their terms restructured in a troubled debt restructuring meet this impaired loan definition. For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, which the Company classifies as a Level 3 valuation.


33

Other real estate owned: Other real estate owned is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral, which the Company classifies as a Level 3 valuation. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below:

(dollars in thousands) Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
  Total
(Fair Value)
 
September 30, 2017                
Impaired loans:                
Commercial $  $  $2,757  $2,757 
Income producing - commercial real estate        8,714   8,714 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate        5,885   5,885 
Real estate mortgage - residential        301   301 
Construction - commercial and residential        2,030   2,030 
Home equity        504   504 
Other consumer        11   11 
Other real estate owned        1,394   1,394 
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2017 $  $  $21,596  $21,596 

(dollars in thousands) Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
  Total
(Fair Value)
 
December 31, 2016                
Impaired loans:                
Commercial $  $  $2,956  $2,956 
Income producing - commercial real estate        12,993   12,993 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate        2,133   2,133 
Real estate mortgage - residential        555   555 
Construction - commercial and residential        1,550   1,550 
Other consumer        13   13 
Other real estate owned        2,694   2,694 
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2016 $  $  $22,894  $22,894 

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis; however, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan loss is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 310,“Receivables.” The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including the collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring a specific allowance represent loans for which the fair value of expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investment in such loans.



At September 30, 2017,2022, substantially all of the totally impairedCompany's individually evaluated loans were evaluated based upon the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, impairedindividually evaluated loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral, i.e. those that are collateral dependent, require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 3.


Other real estate owned: Other real estate owned is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management's estimation of the value of the collateral, which the Company classifies as a Level 3 valuation.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below:
SignificantSignificant
OtherOther
ObservableUnobservable
Quoted PricesInputsInputsTotal
(dollars in thousands)(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)(Fair Value)
September 30, 2022        
Collateral dependent loans
Commercial$— $— $2,459 $2,459 
Income producing - commercial real estate— — 3,081 3,081 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate— — 19,191 19,191 
Real estate mortgage - residential— — 1,580 1,580 
Home equity— — — — 
Other real estate owned— — 1,962 1,962 
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2022$— $— $28,273 $28,273 
December 31, 2021
Collateral dependent loans
Commercial$— $— $8,121 $8,121 
PPP loans— — 1,365 1,365 
Income producing - commercial real estate— — 17,415 17,415 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate— — 42 42 
Real estate mortgage - residential— — 1,779 1,779 
Construction - commercial and residential— — 3,093 3,093 
Home equity— — 366 366 
Other real estate owned— — 1,635 1,635 
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2021$— $— $33,816 $33,816 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company discloses fair value information about financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate the value, whether or not such financial instruments are recognized on the balance sheet. Fair value is the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation, and is best evidenced by quoted market price, if one exists.

34


Quoted market prices, if available, are shown as estimates of fair value. Because no quoted market prices exist for a portion of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments, the fair value of such instruments has been derived based on management’smanagement's assumptions with respect to future economic conditions, the amount and timing of future cash flows and estimated discount rates. Different assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. Accordingly, the net realizable value could be materially different from the estimates presented below. In addition, the estimates are only indicative of individual financial instrument values and should not be considered an indication of the fair value of the Company taken as a whole.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each category of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate value:

Cash due from banks and federal funds sold: For cash and due from banks and federal funds sold the carrying amount approximates fair value.

Interest bearing deposits with other banks: For interest bearing deposits with other banks the carrying amount approximates fair value.

Investment securities: For these instruments, fair values are based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions.

Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The carrying amounts approximate the fair values at the reporting date.

Loans held for sale: As the Company has elected the fair value option, the fair value of residential mortgage loans held for sale is the carrying value and is based on commitments outstanding from investors as well as what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics for residential mortgage loans held for sale since such loans are typically committed to be sold (servicing released) at a profit. The fair value of FHA loans held for sale is the carrying value and is based on commitments outstanding from investors as well as what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics for FHA loans held for sale since such loans are typically committed to be securitized and sold (servicing retained) at a profit.

Loans: For variable rate loans that re-price on a scheduled basis, fair values are based on carrying values. Theestimated fair value of the remaining loans are estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current interest rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining term.

Bank owned life insurance: The fair value of bank owned life insurance is the current cash surrender value, which is the carrying value.

Annuity investment:The fair value of the annuity investments is the carrying amount at the reporting date.

Mortgage banking derivatives:The Company enters into interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) with prospective residential mortgage borrowers. These commitments are carried at fair value based on the fair value of the underlying mortgage loans which are based on market data. These commitments are classified as Level 3 in the fair value disclosures, as the valuations are based on market unobservable inputs. The Company hedges the risk of the overall change in the fair value of loan commitments to borrowers by selling forward contracts on securities of GSEs. These forward settling contracts are classified as Level 3, as valuations are based on market unobservable inputs. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail.


Interest rate swap derivatives:These derivative instruments consist of forward starting interest rate swap agreements, which are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The Company’s derivative position is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and is valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry and that use actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers and/or non-binding broker-dealer quotations. The fair value of the derivatives is determined using discounted cash flow models. These models’ key assumptions include the contractual terms of the respective contract along with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, yield curves, nonperformance risk and volatility. Derivative contracts are executed with a Credit Support Annex, which is a bilateral agreement that requires collateral postings when the market value exceeds certain threshold limits. These agreements protect the interests of the Company and its counterparties should either party suffer a credit rating deterioration.

Noninterest bearing deposits: The fair value of these deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, since generally accepted accounting standards do not permit an assumption of core deposit value.

Interest bearing deposits:The fair value of interest bearing transaction, savings, and money market deposits with no defined maturity is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, since generally accepted accounting standards do not permit an assumption of core deposit value.

Certificates of deposit: The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar deposits with remaining maturities would be accepted.

Customer repurchase agreements: The carrying amount approximate the fair values at the reporting date.

Borrowings: The carrying amount for variable rate borrowings approximate the fair values at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed rate FHLB advances and the subordinated notes are estimated by computing the discounted value of contractual cash flows payable at current interest rates for obligations with similar remaining terms. The fair value of variable rate FHLB advances is estimated to be carrying value since these liabilities are based on a spread to a current pricing index.

Off-balance sheet items: Management has reviewed the unfunded portion of commitments to extend credit, as well as standby and other letters of credit, and has determined that the fair value of such instruments is equal to the fee, if any, collected and unamortized for the commitment made.


The estimated fair values of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments at September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 20162021 are as follows:

        Fair Value Measurements 
          Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets or
Liabilities 
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
(dollars in thousands) Carrying Value  Fair Value  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
September 30, 2017                    
Assets                    
Cash and due from banks $8,246  $8,246  $  $8,246  $ 
Federal funds sold  8,548   8,548      8,548    
Interest bearing deposits with other banks  432,156   432,156      432,156    
Investment securities  556,026   556,026      554,308   1,718 
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock  30,980   30,980      30,980    
Loans held for sale  25,980   25,980      25,980    
Loans, net  6,021,237   6,075,997         6,075,997 
Bank owned life insurance  61,238   61,238      61,238    
Annuity investment  11,591   11,591      11,591    
Mortgage banking derivatives  63   63         63 
Interst rate swap derivatives  191   191      191    
                     
Liabilities                    
Noninterest bearing deposits  1,843,157   1,843,157      1,843,157    
Interest bearing deposits  3,248,118   3,248,118      3,248,118    
Certificates of deposit  822,677   821,892      821,892    
Customer repurchase agreements  73,569   73,569      73,569    
Borrowings  416,807   448,768      448,768    
Mortgage banking derivatives  36   36         36 
Interest rate swap derivatives  24   24      24    
                     
December 31, 2016                    
Assets                    
Cash and due from banks $10,285  $10,285  $  $10,285  $ 
Federal funds sold  2,397   2,397      2,397    
Interest bearing deposits with other banks  355,481   355,481      355,481    
Investment securities  538,108   538,108      536,390   1,718 
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock  21,600   21,600      21,600    
Loans held for sale  51,629   51,629      51,629    
Loans, net  5,618,819   5,624,084         5,624,084 
Bank owned life insurance  60,130   60,130      60,130    
Annuity investment  11,929   11,929      11,929    
Mortgage banking derivatives  114   114         114 
                     
Liabilities                    
Noninterest bearing deposits  1,775,684   1,775,684      1,775,684    
Interest bearing deposits  3,191,682   3,191,682      3,191,682    
Certificates of deposit  748,748   745,985      745,985    
Customer repurchase agreements  68,876   68,876      68,876    
Borrowings  216,514   203,657      203,657    
Mortgage banking derivatives  55   55         55 
Interest rate swap derivatives  692   692      692    


Fair Value Measurements
Quoted Prices (Level 1)Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Carrying
(dollars in thousands)ValueFair Value
September 30, 2022
Assets
Cash and due from banks$27,235 $27,235 $27,235 $— $— 
Federal funds sold$69,809 $69,809 $— $69,809 $— 
Interest bearing deposits with other banks$47,131 $47,131 $— $47,131 $— 
Investment securities available-for-sale$1,649,753 $1,649,753 $— $1,649,753 $— 
Investment securities held-to-maturity$1,114,084 $989,001 $— $977,001 $12,000 
Loans held for sale$9,387 $9,387 $— $9,387 $— 
Loans$7,228,731 $7,117,321 $— $— $7,117,321 
Mortgage banking derivatives$259 $259 $— $— $259 
Interest rate derivatives$30,635 $30,635 $— $30,635 $— 
Liabilities
Noninterest bearing deposits$2,928,774 $2,928,774 $— $2,928,774 $— 
Interest bearing deposits$5,185,335 $5,185,335 $— $5,185,335 $— 
Time deposits$649,241 $639,069 $— $639,069 $— 
Customer repurchase agreements$21,465 $21,465 $— $21,465 $— 
Borrowings$584,763 $583,416 $— $583,416 $— 
Mortgage banking derivatives$115 $115 $— $— $115 
Credit risk participation agreement$$$— $$— 
Interest rate derivatives$29,492 $29,492 $— $29,492 $— 
December 31, 2021
Assets
Cash and due from banks$12,886 $12,886 $12,886 $— $— 
Federal funds sold$20,391 $20,391 $— $20,391 $— 
Interest bearing deposits with other banks$1,680,945 $1,680,945 $— $1,680,945 $— 
Investment securities$2,623,408 $2,623,408 $— $2,611,408 $12,000 
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock$34,153 $34,153 $— $34,153 $— 
Loans held for sale$47,218 $47,218 $— $47,218 $— 
Loans$7,065,598 $6,930,929 $— $— $6,930,929 
Mortgage banking derivatives$636 $636 $— $— $636 
Interest rate derivatives$5,197 $5,197 $— $5,197 $— 
Liabilities
Noninterest bearing deposits$3,277,956 $3,277,956 $— $3,277,956 $— 
Interest bearing deposits$5,974,502 $5,974,502 $— $5,974,502 $— 
Time deposits$729,082 $736,001 $— $736,001 $— 
Customer repurchase agreements$23,918 $23,918 $— $23,918 $— 
Borrowings$369,670 $374,326 $— $374,326 $— 
Credit risk participation agreements$47 $47 $— $47 $— 
Interest rate derivatives$5,147 $5,147 $— $5,147 $— 

35


Note 13. Supplemental11 - Legal Contingencies
There have been no material changes in the status of the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part II, Item 8, "Note 21 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities" of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, except as follows. From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to their business in the ordinary course, including matters in which damages in various amounts are claimed. Based on information currently available, the Company does not believe that the liabilities (if any) resulting from such legal proceedings will have a material effect on the financial position of the Company. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in such matters, ongoing legal expenses or an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could materially and adversely affect the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in any particular reporting period, as well as its reputation.
As previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, on February 10, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "SDNY") approved the settlement agreement of a putative class action lawsuit filed against the Company, its current and former President and Chief Executive Retirement Plan

Officer and its current and former Chief Financial Officer. The settlement included a total payment covered by the Company's insurance of $7.5 million in exchange for the release of all of the defendants from all alleged claims in the class action suit, without any admission or concession of wrongdoing by the Company or the other defendants.

On June 1, 2022, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the SEC staff to resolve the SEC's investigation with respect to the Company's identification, classification and disclosure of related party transactions; the retirement of certain former officers and directors; and the relationship of the Company and certain of its former officers and directors with a local public official, among other things. On August 16, 2022, the SEC approved the settlement, pursuant to which the Company consented, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, to the entry of an administrative cease-and-desist order for violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 13a-1, 14a-9 and 12b-20 thereunder; and agreed to pay a civil money penalty of $10.0 million and $2.6 million in disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest. On October 6, 2022, the SEC staff informed our Chief Financial Officer that it had concluded its related investigation as to him and does not intend to recommend an enforcement action against him. No additional contingent liabilities were recorded in the third quarter of 2022 in connection with the SEC's approval and public announcement of the settlement.
On August 2, 2022, the Bank has entered into Supplementalreached an agreement in principle with the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") to resolve the FRB's investigation with respect to the Bank. As previously disclosed, the investigation relates to the Company's identification, classification and disclosure of related party transactions; and the relationship of the Company and certain of its former officers and directors with a local public official, among other things. On August 16, 2022, the FRB approved the settlement, pursuant to which the Company consented, without admitting or denying the FRB's allegations, to the entry of a consent order for violations of Regulation O, 12 C.F.R. §§ 215 et seq., and unsafe and unsound banking practices, due to internal control deficiencies relating to loans involving its former Chief Executive RetirementOfficer and Death Benefit Agreements (the “SERP Agreements”an inadequate third-party risk management program, in each case from 2015 to 2018, and would pay a civil money penalty of approximately $9.5 million. No additional contingent liabilities were recorded in the third quarter of 2022 in connection with the FRB's approval and public announcement of the settlement.

As previously disclosed, the Company maintains director and officer insurance policies ("D&O Insurance Policies") withthat provide coverage for the legal defense costs related to certain of the Bank’s executive officers other than Mr. Paul, which uponabove-described investigations and litigations and those discussed in the executive’s retirement, will provideCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. When claims are covered by D&O Insurance Policies, the Company records a stated monthly payment for such executive’s lifetimecorresponding receivable against the incurred legal defense cost expense subject to certain death benefits described below. The retirement benefitcoverage under the D&O Insurance Policies and then eliminates the receivable and expense when the claim is computed aspaid. Since the commencement of the above-described matters in 2018 through September 30, 2022, the Company's D&O Insurance carriers have advanced a percentagenumber of each executive’s projected average base salarydefense cost claims to the Company and its current and former directors and officers. Subject to any new developments to the above-described investigations and litigations that may occur over the five years preceding retirement, assuming retirement at age 67. The SERP Agreements providenext few months, the Company currently believes there is a possibility that (a) the benefits vest ratably over six yearsapplicable D&O Insurance Policies may be exhausted as early as the fourth quarter of service to2022. Once the Bank,D&O Insurance Policies are exhausted, the Company will be responsible for paying the defense costs associated with the executive receiving creditabove-described investigations and litigations for yearsitself and on behalf of service priorany current and former Officers and Directors entitled to entering intoindemnification from the SERP Agreement, (b) death, disability and change-in-control shall result in immediate vesting, and (c)Company. The Company cannot predict with any certainty the monthly amount will be reduced if retirement occurs earlier than age 67 for any reason other than death, disability or change-in-control. The SERP Agreements further provide for a death benefitof defense costs that the Company may incur in the event the retired executive dies prior to receiving 180 monthly installments, paid eitherfuture in a lump sum payment or continued monthly installment payments, such that the executive’s beneficiary has received payment(s) sufficient to equate to a cumulative 180 monthly installments.

The SERP Agreementsconnection with currently ongoing and any potential future investigations and legal proceedings, as they are unfunded arrangements maintained primarily to provide supplemental retirement benefits and comply with Section 409Adependent on various factors, many of which are outside of the Internal Revenue Code. Company's control.

36


Note 12 - Subsequent Events
The Bank financedCompany has evaluated subsequent events through the retirement benefits by purchasing fixed annuity contracts with four insurance in 2013 carriers totaling $11.4 millionfiling of this report and determined there have not been any events that have been designedoccurred that would require adjustments to, provide a future source of funds for the lifetime retirement benefits of the SERP Agreements. The primary impetus for utilizing fixed annuities is a substantial savingsor disclosures in compensation expenses for the Bank as opposed to a traditional SERP Agreement. For the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the annuity contracts accrued $54 thousand of income, which was included in other noninterest income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The cash surrender value of the annuity contracts was $11.6 million at September 30, 2017 and is included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded benefit expense accruals of $103 thousand and $308 thousand, for this post retirement benefit.

Upon death of a named executive, the annuity contract related to such executive terminates. The Bank has purchased additional bank owned life insurance contracts, which would effectively finance payments (up to a 15 year certain amount) to the executives’ named beneficiaries.

ItemFinancial Statements.

37


ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

- MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OFOPERATIONS

The following discussion provides information about the results of operations, and financial condition, liquidity, and capital resources of the CompanyEagle Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and its subsidiaries as of the dates and periods indicated. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this report and the Management Discussion and Analysis in the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

2021.

This report contains forward lookingforward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as amended, including statements of goals, intentions, and expectations as to future trends, plans, events or results of Company operations and policies and regarding general economic conditions. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by use of words such words as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “estimates,” “potential,” “continue,” “should,”"may," "will," "can," "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "plans," "estimates," "potential," "assume," "probable," "possible," "continue," "should," "could," "would," "strive," "seeks," "deem," "projections," "forecast," "consider," "indicative," "uncertainty," "likely," "unlikely," "likelihood," "unknown," "attributable," "depends," "intends," "generally," "feel," "typically," "judgment," "subjective" and similar words or phrases. These statements are based upon current and anticipated economic conditions, nationally and in the Company’sCompany's market (including the macroeconomic and other challenges and uncertainties resulting from the coronavirus ("COVID-19") pandemic, including on our credit quality and business operations), interest rates and interest rate policy, competitive factors and other conditions, which by their nature are not susceptible to accurate forecast, and are subject to significant uncertainty. For details on factors that could affect these expectations, see the risk factors contained in this report and the risk factors and other cautionary language included in the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162021, and in other periodic and current reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Because of these uncertainties and the assumptions on which this discussion and the forward-looking statements are based, actual future operations and results in the future may differ materially from those indicated herein. Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. The Company's past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance, and nothing contained herein is meant to or should be considered and treated as earnings guidance of future quarters' performance projections. All information is as of the date of this report. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company speak only as to the date they are made. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, the Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward looking statements.

statement for any reason.

GENERAL

The Company is a growth oriented,growth-oriented, one-bank holding company headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, which is currently celebrating nineteen years of successful operations.Maryland. The Company provides general commercial and consumer banking services through the Bank,EagleBank (the "Bank"), its wholly owned banking subsidiary, a Maryland chartered bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Company was organized in October 1997, to be the holding company for the Bank. The Bank was organized in 1998 as an independent, community oriented, full service banking alternative to the super regional financial institutions, which dominate the Company’sCompany's primary market area. The Company’sCompany's philosophy is to provide superior, personalized service to its customers. The Company focuses on relationship banking, providing each customer with a number of services and becoming familiar with and addressing customer needs in a proactive, personalized fashion. The Bank currently has a total of twenty-onesixteen branch offices, including ninefive in Northern Virginia, sevensix in Montgomery County,Suburban Maryland, and five in Washington, D.C.

The Bank also operates five lending offices, with one in Northern Virginia, three in Suburban Maryland and one in Washington, D.C.

The Bank offers a broad range of commercial banking services to its business and professional clients, as well as full service consumer banking services to individuals living and/or working primarily in the Bank’sBank's market area. The Bank emphasizes providing commercial banking services to sole proprietors, small and medium sizedmedium-sized businesses, non-profit organizations and associations, and investors living and working in and near the primary service area. These services include the usual deposit functions of commercial banks, including business and personal checking accounts, “NOW”"NOW" accounts and money market and savings accounts, business, construction, and commercial loans, residential mortgages and consumer loans, and cash management services. The Bank is also active in the origination and sale of residential mortgage loans and the origination of SBASmall Business Administration ("SBA") loans.

38


The residential mortgage loans are originated for sale to third-party investors, generally large mortgage and banking companies, under best efforts andand/or mandatory delivery commitments with the investors to purchase the loans subject to compliance with pre-established criteria. The decision whether to sell residential mortgage loans on a mandatory or best efforts lock basis is a function of multiple factors, including but not limited to overall market volumes of mortgage loan originations, forecasted "pull-through" rates of origination, loan closing operational considerations, pricing differentials between the two methods, and availability and pricing of various interest rate hedging strategies associated with the mortgage origination pipeline. The Company continually monitors these factors to maximize profitability and minimize operational and interest rate risks.
The Bank generally sells the guaranteed portion of the SBA loans in a transaction apart from the loan origination generating noninterest income from the gains on sale, as well as servicing income on the portion participated. The Company originates a small number of FHAmultifamily Federal Housing Administration ("FHA") loans through the Department of Housing and Urban Development’sDevelopment's Multifamily Accelerated Program (“MAP”("MAP"). The Company securitizes these loans through the Government National Mortgage Association (“("Ginnie Mae”Mae") MBS I program and shortly thereafter sells the resulting securities in the open market to authorized dealers in the normal course of business, and generally retainsperiodically bundles and sells the servicing rights. Bethesda Leasing, LLC, a subsidiary of the Bank, holds title to and manages OREOother real estate owned ("OREO") assets. Eagle Insurance Services, LLC, a subsidiary of the Bank, offers access to insurance products and services through a referral program with a third party insurance broker. Additionally, the Bank offers investment advisory services through referral programs with third parties. ECV,Landroval Municipal Finance, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank, focuses on lending to municipalities by buying debt on the public market as well as direct purchase issuance.
Settlement of Legal Matters
On June 1, 2022, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the SEC staff to resolve the SEC's investigation with respect to the Company's identification, classification and disclosure of related party transactions; the retirement of certain former officers and directors; and the relationship of the Company and certain of its former officers and directors with a local public official, among other things. On August 16, 2022, the SEC approved the settlement, pursuant to which the Company consented, without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, to the entry of an administrative cease-and-desist order for violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rules 13a-1, 14a-9 and 12b-20 thereunder; and agreed to pay a civil money penalty of $10.0 million and $2.6 million in disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest. On October 6, 2022, the SEC staff informed our Chief Financial Officer that it had provided subordinated financingconcluded its related investigation as to him and does not intend to recommend an enforcement action against him. No additional contingent liabilities were recorded in the third quarter of 2022 in connection with the SEC's approval and public announcement of the settlement.
On August 2, 2022, the Bank reached an agreement in principle with the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") to resolve the FRB's investigation with respect to the Bank. As previously disclosed, the investigation relates to the Company's identification, classification and disclosure of related party transactions; and the relationship of the Company and certain of its former officers and directors with a local public official, among other things. On August 16, 2022, the FRB approved the settlement, pursuant to which the Company consented, without admitting or denying the FRB's allegations, to the entry of a consent order for violations of Regulation O, 12 C.F.R. §§ 215 et seq., and unsafe and unsound banking practices, due to internal control deficiencies relating to loans involving its former Chief Executive Officer and an inadequate third-party risk management program, in each case from 2015 to 2018, and would pay a civil money penalty of approximately $9.5 million. No additional contingent liabilities were recorded in the acquisition, development and/or constructionthird quarter of real estate projects. ECV lending involves higher levels2022 in connection with the FRB's approval and public announcement of risk, together with commensurate expected returns.

the settlement.

Impact of COVID-19
The spread of COVID-19 created a global public health crisis that has resulted in unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and disruption in financial markets and in governmental, commercial and consumer activity in the U.S. and globally, including the markets that we serve. As the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing and dynamic in nature, there are many uncertainties, including its severity, duration, impact to our customers, employees and vendors, impact to the financial services and banking industry, impact to the economy as a whole and the level of governmental intervention (both economic and health-related). COVID-19 has negatively affected, and may continue to negatively affect the Company. Furthermore, economic conditions remain unclear and significant volatility could continue for a prolonged period as the potential exists for additional variants of COVID-19 to adversely impact the economy.
39


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’sCompany's Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and follow general practices within the banking industry. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the Consolidated Financial Statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or a valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility.

Investment Securities

The fair valuesCompany applies the accounting policies contained in Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the information used to record valuation adjustments for investment securities available-for-sale are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available. The Company’s investment portfolio is categorized as available-for-sale with unrealized gains and losses net of income tax being a component of shareholders’ equity and accumulated other comprehensive loss.


Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two principles of accounting: (a) ASC Topic 450,“Contingencies,” which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and are estimable and (b) ASC Topic 310,“Receivables,” which requires that losses be accrued when it is probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments accordingNote 1 to the contractual terms ofConsolidated Financial Statements included in this report. There have been no significant changes to the loan. The loss, if any, can be determined by the difference between the loan balance and the value of collateral, the present value of expected future cash flows, or values observableCompany's accounting policies as disclosed in the secondary markets.

Three components comprise our allowance for credit losses: a specific allowance, a formula allowance and a nonspecific or environmental factors allowance. Each component is determined basedCompany's Annual Report on estimates that can and do change when actual events occur.

The specific allowance allocates a reserve to identified impaired loans. Impaired loans are assigned specific reserves based on an impairment analysis. Under ASC Topic 310,“Receivables,” a loan for which reserves are individually allocated may show deficiencies in the borrower’s overall financial condition, payment record, support available from financial guarantors andForm 10-K for the fair market valueyear ended December 31, 2021 except as indicated in "Investment Securities," "Transfers of collateral. When a loan is identified as impaired, a specific reserve is established based on the Company’s assessment of the loss that may be associated with the individual loan.

The formula allowance is usedInvestment Securities from Available-for-Sale to estimate the loss on internally risk rated loans, exclusive of those identified as requiring specific reserves. The portfolio of unimpaired loans is stratified by loan typeHeld-to-Maturity" and risk assessment. Allowance factors relate"Accounting Standards Adopted in 2022" in Note 1 to the type of loan and level of the internal risk rating, with loans exhibiting higher risk and loss experience receiving a higher allowance factor.

The environmental allowance is also used to estimate the loss associated with pools of non-classified loans. These non-classified loans are also stratified by loan type, and environmental allowance factors are assigned by management based upon a number of conditions, including delinquencies, loss history, changesConsolidated Financial Statements in lending policy and procedures, changes in business and economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, management expertise, concentrations within the portfolio, quality of internal and external loan review systems, competition, and legal and regulatory requirements.

The allowance captures losses inherent in the loan portfolio, which have not yet been recognized. Allowance factors and the overall size of the allowance may change from period to period based upon management’s assessment of the above described factors, the relative weights given to each factor, and portfolio composition.

Management has significant discretion in making the judgments inherent in the determination of the provision and allowance for credit losses, including in connection with the valuation of collateral, a borrower’s prospects of repayment, and in establishing allowance factors on the formula and environmental components of the allowance. The establishment of allowance factors involves a continuing evaluation, based on management’s ongoing assessment of the global factors discussed above and their impact on the portfolio. The allowance factors may change from period to period, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount of the provision or allowance, based upon the same volume and classification of loans. Changes in allowance factors can have a direct impact on the amount of the provision, and a related after tax effect on net income. Errors in management’s perception and assessment of the global factors and their impact on the portfolio could result in the allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the portfolio, and may result in additional provisions or charge-offs. Alternatively, errors in management’s perception and assessment of the global factors and their impact on the portfolio could result in the allowance being in excess of amounts necessary to cover losses in the portfolio, and may result in lower provisions in the future. For additional information regarding the provision for credit losses, refer to the discussion under the caption “Provision for Credit Losses” below.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights. Intangible assets that have finite lives, such as core deposit intangibles, are amortized over their estimated useful lives and subject to periodic impairment testing. Intangible assets (other than goodwill) are amortized to expense using accelerated or straight-line methods over their respective estimated useful lives.


Goodwill is subject to impairment testing at the reporting unit level, which must be conducted at least annually. The Company performs impairment testing during the fourth quarter of each year or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired.

The Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing updated qualitative factors, the Company determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it does not have to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit under the second step of the goodwill impairment test are judgmental and often involve the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Similarly, estimates and assumptions are used in determining the fair value of other intangible assets. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flows, market comparisons and recent transactions. These approaches use significant estimates and assumptions including projected future cash flows, discount rates reflecting the market rate of return, projected growth rates and determination and evaluation of appropriate market comparables. Based on the results of qualitative assessments of all reporting units, the Company concluded that no impairment existed at December 31, 2016. However, future events could cause the Company to conclude that goodwill or other intangibles have become impaired, which would result in recording an impairment loss. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 718,“Compensation,” which requires the expense recognition for the fair value of share based compensation awards, such as stock options, restricted stock awards, and performance based shares. This standard allows management to establish modeling assumptions as to expected stock price volatility, option terms, forfeiture rates and dividend rates which directly impact estimated fair value. The accounting standard also allows for the use of alternative option pricing models which may impact fair value as determined. The Company’s practice is to utilize reasonable and supportable assumptions.

Derivatives

Interest rate swap derivatives designated as qualified cash flow hedges are tested for hedge effectiveness on a quarterly basis. Assessments are made at the inception of the hedge and on a recurring basis to determine whether the derivative used in the hedging transaction has been and is expected to continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. A statistical regression analysis is performed to measure the effectiveness.

If, based on the assessment, a derivative is not expected to be a highly effective hedge or it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued as of the quarter the hedge is not highly effective. As the statistical regression analysis requires the use of estimates regarding the amount and timing of future cash flows which are sensitive to significant changes in future periods based on changes in market rates; we consider this a critical accounting estimate.

report.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Earnings Summary

For the three months ended

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017, net income was $29.9 million, a 22% increase over the $24.5 million net2022 vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Net2022 was $37.3 million compared to $43.6 million for the same period in 2021, a decrease of $6.3 million, or 14.5%.
The decrease in net income per basic common shareof $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $0.87 compared2022 relative to $0.73 for the same period in 2016, a 19% increase. Net income per diluted common share for the three months ended September 30, 20172021 was $0.87 compared to $0.72 for the same period in 2016, a 21% increase.


For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s net income was $84.7 million, an 18% increase over the $72.0 million for the same period in 2016. Net income per basic common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $2.48 compared to $2.14 for the same period in 2016, a 16% increase. Net income per diluted common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $2.47 compared to $2.11 for the same period in 2016, a 17% increase.

The increase in net income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 can be attributeddue primarily to an increase in totalprovision for credit losses of $11.2 million and a decrease in noninterest income of $3.0 million, which were partially offset by an increase in net interest income of $4.9 million and a decrease in income taxes of $2.9 million. Noninterest income decreased due to decreases in gain on sale of residential loans of $2.5 million and a decrease in gain on sale of investment securities of $1.5 million, which were partially offset by an increase on other income of $911 thousand.

Total revenue (i.e. net interest income plus noninterest income) of 11% over the same period in 2016. Net interest income grew 11%was $89.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 20172022 as compared to $87.3 million for the same period in 2016 due to average earning asset growth2021. The most significant portion of 10%.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company reported an annualized ROAA of 1.66% as compared to 1.50%revenue is net interest income, which was $83.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The annualized ROACE for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 12.86%, as2022, compared to 12.04%$79.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

The increase in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 can be attributed primarily to an increase in total revenue (i.e. net interest income plus noninterest income) of 8% over the same period in 2016.2021. Net interest income grew 9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to average earning asset growth of 12%.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company reported an annualized ROAA of 1.63% as compared to 1.54% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The annualized ROACE for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 12.71%, as compared to 12.27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The higher ratios areincreased due to increased earnings.

income on investments and loans, due to higher average investment and loan balances and variable rate loans adjusting upwards as rates increased, which was partially offset by the decrease in total deposits, increased interest expense due to higher rates on deposits and faster rate adjustments on money market and savings accounts.

The net interest margin, which measures the difference between interest income and interest expense (i.e. net interest income) as a percentage of earning assets, increased 3 basis points from 4.11%was 3.02% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to 4.14% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Average earning asset yields were 4.74% for the three months ended September 30, 20172022 and 4.60%2.73% for the same period in 2016.2021. The average costdrivers of interest bearing liabilities increased by 20 basis points (to 0.97% from 0.77%) for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Combining the change are detailed in the yield on earning assets"Net Interest Income and the costs of interest bearing liabilities, the net interest spread decreased by 6 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 2016 (3.77% versus 3.83%).

The benefit of noninterest sources funding earning assets increased by 9 basis points to 37 basis points from 28 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2017 versus the same period in 2016. The combination of a 6 basis point decrease in the net interest spread and a 9 basis point increase in the value of noninterest sources resulted in the 3 basis point increase in the net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The net interest margin was positively impacted by one basis point in the three months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of $214 thousand in amortization of the credit mark established in connection with the 2014 merger of Virginia Heritage Bank into EagleBank (the “Merger”). The net interest margin was positively impacted by two basis points in the three months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of $384 thousand in amortization of the credit mark adjustment from the Merger.

The net interest margin decreased 9 basis points from 4.23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to 4.14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Average earning asset yields were 4.72% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 4.65% for the same period in 2016. The average cost of interest bearing liabilities increased by 28 basis points (to 0.93% from 0.65%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Combining the change in the yield on earning assets and the costs of interest bearing liabilities, the net interest spread decreased by 21 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 2016 (3.79% versus 4.00%).


The benefit of noninterest sources funding earning assets increased by 12 basis points to 35 basis points from 23 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the same period in 2016. The combination of a 21 basis point decrease in the net interest spread and a 12 basis point increase in the value of noninterest sources resulted in the 9 basis point decrease in the net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The net interest margin was positively impacted by three basis points in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of $1.7 million in amortization of the credit mark established in connection with the Merger. The net interest margin was positively impacted by two basis points in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of $1.1 million in amortization of the credit mark adjustment from the Merger.

The Company believes it has effectively managed its net interest margin and net interest income over the past twelve months as market interest rates (on average) have remained relatively low. This factor has been significant to overall earnings performance over the past twelve months as net interest income represents 91% of the Company’s total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

For the first nine months of 2017, total loans grew 7% over December 31, 2016, and averaged 11% higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. For the first nine months of 2017, total deposits increased 4% over December 31, 2016, and averaged 9% higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared with the same period in 2016.

In order to fund growth in average loans of 11% over the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, as well as sustain significant liquidity, the Company has relied on both core deposit growth and wholesale deposits. The major component of the growth in core deposits has been growth in noninterest bearing accounts primarily as a result of effectively building new and enhanced client relationships.

In terms of the average asset composition or mix, loans, which generally have higher yields than securities and other earning assets, were 87.0% of average earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 87.2% for the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, average loans, excluding loans held for sale, increased $596.1 million, an 11% increase. The increase in average loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 is primarily attributable to growth in income producing - commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and owner occupied – commercial real estate. Average investment securities for both the nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 amounted to 8% of average earning assets. The combination of federal funds sold, interest bearing deposits with other banks and loans held for sale averaged 5% of average earning assets for both the first nine months of 2017 and 2016. On an average basis, the combination of federal funds sold, interest bearing deposits with other banks and loans held for sale increased $19.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The provision for credit losses was $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $2.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The lower provisioning in the third quarter of 2017, as compared to the third quarter of 2016, is primarily due to lower net charge-offs and to overall improved asset quality. Net charge-offs of $2 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 represented an annualized 0.00% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, as compared to $2.0 million, or an annualized 0.14% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, in the third quarter of 2016. Net charge-offs in the third quarter of 2017 were attributable primarily to net charge-offs in commercial and industrial loans ($114 thousand) offset by net recoveries in construction - commercial and residential ($106 thousand).

At September 30, 2017 the allowance for credit losses represented 1.03% of loans outstanding, as compared to 1.04% at both December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans at September 30, 2017, as compared to September 30, 2016, is the result of continuing improvement in historical losses. The allowance for credit losses represented 379% of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2017, as compared to 330% at December 31, 2016, and 255% at September 30, 2016.

Interest Margin" section below.

Total noninterest income for the three months ended September 30, 20172022 decreased to $5.3 million from $8.3 million for the same period in 2021, a 36.0% decrease. Noninterest income was lower due to decreases in gain on sale of residential and securitized loans and gain on sale of investment securities. For further information on the components and drivers of these changes see "Noninterest Income" section below.
Gain on sale of loans for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was $821 thousand compared to $3.3 million for the same period in 2021, a decrease of 75.4%. The continuing rise in interest rates for residential mortgages in 2022 had a substantial negative impact on the volume of residential mortgage originations (down 79.44% compared to the third quarter of 2021) and in turn the sale of residential mortgages declined.
40


Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 increased to $6.8$2.5 million from $6.4$1.6 million for the same period in 2021, a 56.9% increase. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in other loan income of $543 thousand, gain on sale of loans securitized of $248 thousand, and $189 thousand increase in miscellaneous income.
Noninterest expenses totaled $36.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016,2022, as compared to $36.4 million for same period in 2021, a 6% increase, due substantially to income of $780 thousand0.5% decrease. See the "Noninterest Expense" section for further detail on the origination, securitization, servicingcomponents and saledrivers of FHA Multifamily-Backed GNMA securities in the third quarter of 2017, offset by lower sales of residential mortgage loans and the resulting gains on the sale of these loans (gain of $1.8change.
Income tax expenses were $11.9 million for the third quarterthree months ended September 30, 2022, a decrease of 2017 versus $2.9 million for19.8%, compared to the same period in 2016). There was no revenue related to FHA Multifamily-Backed GNMA securities2021. The components and drivers of the change are discussed in the third quarter of 2016. The portfolio sale of $37.0 million in residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio resulted in $168 thousand in revenue during the third quarter of 2017. There was no income related to portfolio sales of residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio during the third quarter of 2016. The sale of the guaranteed portion on SBA loans resulted in $390 thousand in revenue during the third quarter of 2017 compared to $101 thousand for the same period in 2016. Other loan income was $771 thousand for the third quarter of 2017 compared to $632 thousand for the same period in 2016. Residential mortgage loans closed were $135 million for the third quarter of 2017 versus $276 million for the third quarter of 2016. Excluding gains on sales of investment securities, noninterest income was $6.8 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to $6.4 million for the third quarter of 2016, an increase of 6%.

"Income Tax Expense" section below.

The efficiency ratio, which measures the ratio of noninterest expense to total revenue, was 37.49% for the third quarter of 2017, as compared to 40.54% for the third quarter of 2016. Noninterest expenses totaled $29.5 million40.59% for the three months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to $28.841.65% for the same period in 2021. The improvement in the efficiency ratio was driven primarily by an increase in net interest income of $4.9 million which was partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in noninterest income.

For the three months ended September 30, 2022, the Company reported an annualized return on average assets ("ROAA") of 1.29%, as compared to 1.46% for the same period in 2021. Total shareholders' equity was $1.2 billion at September 30, 2022, compared to $1.3 billion a year earlier. The annualized return on average common equity ("ROACE") for the three months ended September 30, 2016, a 2% increase. Legal, accounting, and professional fees increased2022 was 11.64% as compared to 13.00% for the same period in 2021. The annualized return on average tangible common equity ("ROATCE") for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was 12.67% as compared to 14.11% for the same period in 2021. The decline in returns was driven primarily by $469 thousand primarily due to general bank consulting projects. FDIC insurance premiums increased by $300 thousand primarily due to a larger assessment base. Salaries and benefits expenses decreased $225 thousand due primarily to a decrease in employee benefit costs duenet income.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 was $98.7 million as compared to $135.1 million for the prior year accelerationsame period in 2021, a decrease of restricted stock awards, offset by merit increases.

$36.3 million, or 26.9%.

The provision for credit losses was $4.9decrease in net income of $36.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared2022 relative to $9.2the same period in 2021 was due to an increase in provision for credit losses of $15.1 million, a decrease in noninterest income of $11.5 million and an increase in noninterest expenses of $16.3 million, which were partially offset by an increase in net interest income of $939 thousand and a reduction of income tax expense of $7.5 million. Non interest income decreased primarily due to a decrease in gain on sale of residential and securitized loans. During the nine months ended September 30, 2022, the Company closed residential mortgage locked commitments of $286.2 million, down from $831.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The lower provisioning2021. Noninterest expenses increased primarily in connection with the accrual of settlement expenses in the firstsecond quarter of 2022 in connection with the agreements with the SEC and FRB totaling $22.9 million, which was partially offset by reductions in salaries and benefits of $3.4 million, legal and professional fees of $2.5 million and $2.3 million in FDIC insurance. Additional detail is provided in "Noninterest Expense" section below.
Total revenue (i.e. net interest income plus noninterest income) was $265.6 million for the nine months of 2017,ended September 30, 2022 as compared to the first nine months of 2016, is due to a combination of lower net charge-offs, lower loan growth, as net loans increased $406.3$276.1 million during the first nine months of 2017, as compared to an increase of $483.6 million duringfor the same period in 2016,2021. The most significant portion of revenue is net interest income, which was $247.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022, compared to $246.3 million for the same period in 2021. Net interest income increased due to increased average balances and to overall improved asset quality. Net charge-offsincome on investments and lower average balance on deposits and borrowings which was partially offset by lower average loan balances, increased interest rates on deposits and faster rate adjustments on money market and savings accounts. The primary driver for the reduction in noninterest income was a decrease in gain on sale of $991 thousandresidential and securitized loans.
The net interest margin, which measures the difference between interest income and interest expense (i.e. net interest income) as a percentage of earning assets, was 2.86% for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2.91% for the same period in 2021. The drivers of the change are detailed in the first nine months of 2017 represented an annualized 0.02% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, as compared to $5.0 million or an annualized 0.13% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, in the first nine months of 2016."Net Interest Income and Net charge-offs in the first nine months of 2017 were attributable primarily to commercial real estate loans.

Interest Margin" section below.

Total noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 20172022 decreased to $18.3 million from $29.8 million for the same period in 2021, a 38.5% decrease. Noninterest income was $19.9lower due to decreases in gain on sale of investment securities and residential and securitized loans. For further information on the components and drivers of these changes see "Noninterest Income" section below.
Gain on sale of loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 was $3.2 million as compared to $20.3$12.0 million for the same period in 2021, a decrease of 73.6%. The rise in interest rates for residential mortgages in 2022 has had a substantial negative impact on the volume of residential mortgage originations and in turn the sale of residential mortgages declined.
41


Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 decreased to $9.5 million from $11.0 million for the same period in 2021, a 14.2% decrease. This decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in gains on the sale of securitized loans of $2.5 million which was partially offset by an increase in other loan income of $972 thousand.
Noninterest expense totaled $126.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, a 2% decrease. This was primarily due2022, as compared to fewer sales of SBA and residential mortgage loans resulting in a $785 thousand and $939 thousand decreased gain on the sale of these loans, respectively, and a $581 thousand decreased gain on sale of securities, offset by revenue associated with the origination, securitization, servicing, and sale of FHA Multifamily-Backed GNMA securities of $1.5$109.9 million and a $338 thousand increase in service charges on deposits. The portfolio sale of $37.0 million in residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio resulted in $168 thousand in revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. There was no income related to portfolio sales of residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio for theor same period in 2016. Excluding investment securities net gains, total2021, a 14.9% increase. The increase in non-interest expense was due to the $22.9 million accrual of settlement expenses which was partially offset by the $5.0 million accrual reduction related to share-based compensation awards and deferred compensation associated with our former CEO and Chairman which reduced noninterest income was $19.3expense. See the "Noninterest Expense" section for further detail on the components and drivers of the change.
Income tax expenses were $38.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as2022, a decrease of 16.2%, compared to $19.1 million for the same period in 2016, a 1% increase.

2021. The components and drivers of the change are discussed in the "Income Tax Expense" section below.

The efficiency ratio which measures the ratio of noninterest expense to total revenue, was 38.86%47.51% for the nine months ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to 40.32%39.78% for the same period in 2016. Noninterest2021. The adverse change in the efficiency ratio was driven by the $22.9 million accrual of settlement expenses, totaled $88.7which increased noninterest expense, and was partially offset by the $5.0 million accrual reduction related to share-based compensation awards and deferred compensation associated with our former CEO and Chairman which reduced noninterest expense. Refer to the "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section for additional detail and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, the Company reported an annualized ROAA of 1.11%, as compared to 1.56% for the same period in 2021. The annualized ROACE for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022 was 10.17% as compared to $85.2 million13.98% for the same period in 2021. The annualized ROATCE for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, a 4% increase. Cost increases for salaries and benefits were $1.3 million, due2022 was 11.06% as compared to 15.21% or the same period in 2021. The decline in returns was attributable primarily to increased meritthe $22.9 million of settlement expenses and incentive compensation, offset by a decrease in employee benefit costs duethe reduction on the gain on sale of loans as higher interest rates reduced mortgage origination volume.Refer to the prior year acceleration"Use of restricted stock awards. MarketingNon-GAAP Financial Measures" section for additional detail and advertising increased by $322 thousand duea reconciliation of GAAP to costs associated with digital and print advertising and sponsorships. Data processing increased by $341 thousand due primarily to increased vendor fees associated with higher volumes and rates. Legal, accounting and professional fees increased by $694 thousand primarily due to enhanced IT risk management and general bank consulting projects. Other expenses increased $799 thousand primarily due to higher broker fees.

The ratio of common equity to total assets increased to 12.63% at September 30, 2017 from 12.06% at September 30, 2016, due primarily to an increase of $110.4 million in retained earnings. As discussed later in “Capital Resources and Adequacy,” the regulatory capital ratios of the Bank and Company remain above well capitalized levels.

non-GAAP financial measures.

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets and the cost of funds supporting those assets. Earning assets are composed primarily of loans, investment securities, and investment securities.interest bearing deposits with other banks and other short term investments. The cost of funds representsincludes interest expense on deposits, customer repurchase agreements and other borrowings. Noninterest bearing deposits and capital are other components representing funding sources (refer to discussion above under Results of Operations). Changes in the volume and mix of assets and funding sources, along with the changes in yields earned and rates paid, determine changes in net interest income.


For the three months ended September 30, 2017, netNet interest income increased 11% over the same period for 2016. Average loans increased by $523.7was $83.9 million and average deposits increased by $474.1 million. The net interest margin was 4.14% for the three months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to 4.11%$79.0 million for the same period in 2016. The Company believes its net2021. Net interest margin remains favorable as compared to its peer banking companies.

Forincome increased for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017, net2022 primarily due to an increase in average loans balances and yields (5.10% compared to 4.59%) and higher average investment balances and yields and on other average earning assets, which was partially offset by lower average deposit and borrowing balances with an increased interest income increased 9% over the same period for 2016. Average loans increased by $596.1 million and average deposits increased by $456.0 million. rate as compared to September 30, 2021.

The net interest margin was 4.14%3.02% for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2.73% for the same period in 2021. The increase reflects the impact of the change in yields on earning assets which repriced primarily due to rate increases, which more than offset the increase in rates forand faster rate adjustments on interest bearing liabilities.
Net interest income was $247.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to 4.23%$246.3 million for the same period in 2016. 2021. Net interest income increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 due to an increase in higher yielding earning assets, which was partially offset by lower loan volumes and increased rates on interest bearing deposits, as compared to September 30, 2021.
The Company believes its net interest margin remains favorablewas 2.86% for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2.91% for the same period in 2021. The decline reflects the impact of an increase in average earning assets and yields which was more than offset by an increase in the cost of funds.
42


Net interest margin decreased by 5 basis points from the first nine months of 2021 as compared to its peer banking companies.

the first nine months of 2022 (from 2.91% to 2.86%). The yield on earning assets increased by 13 basis points (from 3.29% to 3.42%) while cost of funds increased 18 basis points (from 0.38% to 0.56%). Average interest bearing deposits with other banks and other short term investments were $1.4 billion nine months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $2.3 billion for the same period in 2021. Overall yields and rates moved higher in the first nine months of 2022 as compared to same period in 2021, variable rate loans adjusted upwards and an increased number of loans moved off their rate floors.

The tables below presentpresents the average balances and rates of the major categories of the Company’sCompany's assets and liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.2021. Included in the tables are a measurementmeasurements of interest rate spread and margin. Interest rate spread is the difference (expressed as a percentage) between the interest rate earned on earning assets less the interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. While the interest rate spread provides a quick comparison of earnings rates versus cost of funds, management believes that margin, together with net interest income, provides a better measurement of performance. The net interest margin (as compared to net interest spread) includes the effect of noninterest bearing sources in its calculation andcalculation. Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.


43



Eagle Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Average Balances, Interest Yields And Rates (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

  Three Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
  Average Balance  Interest  Average Yield/Rate  Average Balance  Interest  Average Yield/Rate 
ASSETS                  
Interest earning assets:                        
Interest bearing deposits with other banks and other short-term investments $331,194  $991   1.19% $338,521  $376   0.44%
Loans held for sale (1)  37,146   350   3.77%  66,791   586   3.51%
Loans (1)(2)  5,946,411   77,826   5.19%  5,422,677   69,283   5.08%
Investment securities available for sale (2)  576,423   3,194   2.20%  429,207   2,177   2.02%
Federal funds sold  6,439   9   0.55%  9,115   9   0.39%
Total interest earning assets  6,897,613   82,370   4.74%  6,266,311   72,431   4.60%
                         
Total noninterest earning assets  292,891           281,784         
Less: allowance for credit losses  61,735           55,821         
Total noninterest earning assets  231,156           225,963         
TOTAL ASSETS $7,128,769          $6,492,274         
                         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                        
Interest bearing liabilities:                        
Interest bearing transaction $406,923  $506   0.49% $269,230  $193   0.29%
Savings and money market  2,663,762   4,211   0.63%  2,641,863   2,976   0.45%
Time deposits  866,595   2,516   1.15%  784,834   1,671   0.85%
Total interest bearing deposits  3,937,280   7,233   0.73%  3,695,927   4,840   0.52%
Customer repurchase agreements  73,345   58   0.31%  73,749   39   0.21%
Other short-term borrowings  54,840   164   1.17%  50,013   383   3.00%
Long-term borrowings  216,774   2,979   5.38%  176,321   2,441   5.42%
Total interest bearing liabilities  4,282,239   10,434   0.97%  3,996,010   7,703   0.77%
                         
Noninterest bearing liabilities:                        
Noninterest bearing demand  1,890,673           1,657,907         
Other liabilities  34,364           28,384         
Total noninterest bearing liabilities  1,925,037           1,686,291         
                         
Shareholders’ equity  921,493           809,973         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $7,128,769          $6,492,274         
                         
Net interest income     $71,936          $64,728     
Net interest spread          3.77%          3.83%
Net interest margin          4.14%          4.11%
Cost of funds          0.60%          0.49%

(1)Loans placed on nonaccrual status are included in average balances. Net loan fees and late charges included in interest income on loans totaled $4.7 million and $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Interest and fees on loans and investments exclude tax equivalent adjustments.


Three Months Ended September 30,
20222021
Average
Balance
InterestAverage
Yield/Rate
Average
Balance
InterestAverage
Yield/Rate
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Interest bearing deposits with other banks and other short-term investments$771,063 $4,100 2.11 %$2,668,265 $1,083 0.16 %
Loans held for sale (1)
11,586 150 5.18 %56,866 642 4.52 %
Loans (1) (2)
7,282,589 93,594 5.10 %7,055,621 81,540 4.59 %
Investment securities available-for-sale (2)
1,782,859 7,587 1.69 %1,670,723 5,877 1.40 %
Investment securities held-to-maturity (2)
1,128,943 5,876 2.06 %— — — %
Federal funds sold53,630 220 1.63 %34,805 10 0.11 %
Total interest earning assets11,030,670 111,527 4.01 %11,486,280 89,152 3.08 %
Total noninterest earning assets475,581 432,215 
Less: allowance for credit losses75,141 92,169 
Total noninterest earning assets400,440 340,046 
TOTAL ASSETS$11,431,110 $11,826,326 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing transaction$960,970 $1,891 0.78 %$842,086 $402 0.19 %
Savings and money market4,504,216 21,711 1.91 %4,971,866 3,645 0.29 %
Time deposits633,241 2,523 1.58 %763,513 2,543 1.32 %
Total interest bearing deposits6,098,427 26,125 1.70 %6,577,465 6,590 0.40 %
Customer repurchase agreements26,546 55 0.82 %27,348 14 0.20 %
Other short-term borrowings61,703 412 2.67 %300,003 506 0.67 %
Long-term borrowings69,752 1,038 5.95 %121,346 2,997 9.88 %
Total interest bearing liabilities6,256,428 27,630 1.75 %7,026,162 10,107 0.57 %
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Noninterest bearing demand3,809,070 3,370,649 
Other liabilities93,859 98,493 
Total noninterest bearing liabilities3,902,929 3,469,142 
Shareholders' Equity1,271,753 1,331,022 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY$11,431,110 $11,826,326 
Net interest income$83,897 $79,045 
Net interest spread2.26 %2.51 %
Net interest margin3.02 %2.73 %
Cost of funds0.99 %0.35 %

Eagle Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Average Balances,

(1)Loans placed on nonaccrual status are included in average balances. Net loan fees and late charges included in interest income on loans totaled $3.4 million and $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(2)Interest Yields and Rates (Unaudited)

(dollarsfees on loans and investments exclude tax equivalent adjustments.

44



Nine Months Ended September 30,
20222021
Average
Balance
InterestAverage
Yield/Rate
Average
Balance
InterestAverage
Yield/Rate
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Interest bearing deposits with other banks and other short-term investments$1,449,800 $7,608 0.70 %$2,288,660 $2,239 0.13 %
Loans held for sale (1)
18,216 548 4.01 %79,264 1,936 3.26 %
Loans (1) (2)
7,147,844 249,168 4.66 %7,385,733 258,188 4.67 %
Investment securities available for sale (2)
2,119,822 25,888 1.63 %1,506,996 15,878 1.41 %
Investment securities held-to-maturity (2)
774,135 12,002 2.07 %— — — %
Federal funds sold37,907 269 0.95 %32,146 25 0.10 %
Total interest earning assets11,547,724 295,483 3.42 %11,292,799 278,266 3.29 %
Total noninterest earning assets466,661 408,167 
Less: allowance for credit losses74,390 100,756 
Total noninterest earning assets392,271 307,411 
TOTAL ASSETS$11,939,995 $11,600,210 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing transaction$858,152 $2,843 0.44 %$819,033 $1,217 0.20 %
Savings and money market4,926,766 34,207 0.93 %4,842,621 11,312 0.31 %
Time deposits670,708 6,972 1.39 %826,790 8,759 1.42 %
Total interest bearing deposits6,455,626 44,022 0.91 %6,488,444 21,288 0.44 %
Customer repurchase agreements25,765 90 0.47 %22,240 34 0.20 %
Other short-term borrowings131,253 992 1.01 %300,003 1,502 0.67 %
Long-term borrowings69,722 3,112 5.95 %197,090 9,114 6.17 %
Total interest bearing liabilities6,682,366 48,216 0.96 %7,007,777 31,938 0.61 %
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Noninterest bearing demand3,863,283 3,206,250 
Other liabilities96,176 93,960 
Total noninterest bearing liabilities3,959,459 3,300,210 
Shareholders’ Equity1,298,170 1,292,223 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$11,939,995 $11,600,210 
Net interest income$247,267 $246,328 
Net interest spread2.46 %2.68 %
Net interest margin2.86 %2.91 %
Cost of funds0.56 %0.38 %
(1)Loans placed on nonaccrual status are included in thousands)

  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
  Average Balance  Interest  Average Yield/Rate  Average Balance  Interest  Average Yield/Rate 
ASSETS                  
Interest earning assets:                        
Interest bearing deposits with other banks and other short-term investments $290,366  $2,084   0.96% $254,348  $856   0.45%
Loans held for sale (1)  34,925   1,020   3.89%  47,786   1,288   3.59%
Loans (1)(2)  5,849,832   225,523   5.15%  5,253,742   200,714   5.10%
Investment securities available for sale (2)  541,378   8,854   2.19%  462,408   7,121   2.06%
Federal funds sold  6,163   27   0.59%  9,550   31   0.43%
Total interest earning assets  6,722,664   237,508   4.72%  6,027,834   210,010   4.65%
                         
Total noninterest earning assets  292,700           280,220         
Less: allowance for credit losses  60,416           55,187         
Total noninterest earning assets  232,284           225,033         
TOTAL ASSETS $6,954,948          $6,252,867         
                         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                        
Interest bearing liabilities:                        
Interest bearing transaction $366,521  $1,081   0.39% $234,481  $445   0.25%
Savings and money market  2,677,777   12,171   0.61%  2,656,638   8,324   0.42%
Time deposits  795,884   6,214   1.04%  764,099   4,744   0.83%
Total interest bearing deposits  3,840,182   19,466   0.68%  3,655,218   13,513   0.49%
Customer repurchase agreements  70,702   136   0.26%  71,973   115   0.21%
Other short-term borrowings  58,797   441   0.99%  38,873   727   2.46%
Long-term borrowings  216,675   8,937   5.44%  105,005   4,515   5.65%
Total interest bearing liabilities  4,186,356   28,980   0.93%  3,871,069   18,870   0.65%
                         
Noninterest bearing liabilities:                        
Noninterest bearing demand  1,841,645           1,570,586         
Other liabilities  36,130           27,713         
Total noninterest bearing liabilities  1,877,775           1,598,299         
                         
Shareholders’ equity  890,817           783,499         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $6,954,948          $6,252,867         
                         
Net interest income     $208,528          $191,140     
Net interest spread          3.79%          4.00%
Net interest margin          4.14%          4.23%
Cost of funds          0.58%          0.42%

(1)Loans placed on nonaccrual status are included in average balances. Net loan fees and late charges included in interest income on loans totaled $12.9 million and $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Interest and fees on loans and investments exclude tax equivalent adjustments.

average balances. Net loan fees and late charges included in interest income on loans totaled $11.5 million and $26.3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(2)Interest and fees on loans and investments exclude tax equivalent adjustments.


45


Rate/Volume Analysis of Net Interest Income
The rate/volume tables below presents the composition of the change in net interest income for the period indicated, as allocated between the change in net interest income due to changes in the volume of average earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, and the changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared With Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Change
Due to
Volume
Change
Due to
Rate
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
Interest earned on
Loans$2,623 $9,431 $12,054 
Loans held for sale(511)19 (492)
Investment securities available-for-sale394 1,316 1,710 
Investment securities held-to-maturity3,972 1,904 5,876 
Interest bearing bank deposits(770)3,787 3,017 
Federal funds sold205 210 
Total interest income5,713 16,662 22,375 
Interest paid on
Interest bearing transaction57 1,432 1,489 
Savings and money market(343)18,409 18,066 
Time deposits(434)414 (20)
Customer repurchase agreements— 41 41 
Other borrowings(1,676)(377)(2,053)
Total interest expense(2,396)19,919 17,523 
Net interest income$8,109 $(3,257)$4,852 
46



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared With Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Change
Due to
Volume
Change
Due to
Rate
Total
Increase
(Decrease)
Interest earned on
Loans$(8,316)$(704)$(9,020)
Loans held for sale(1,491)103 (1,388)
Investment securities available-for-sale6,457 3,553 10,010 
Investment securities held-to-maturity8,156 3,846 12,002 
Interest bearing bank deposits(821)6,190 5,369 
Federal funds sold240 244 
Total interest income3,989 13,228 17,217 
Interest paid on
Interest bearing transaction58 1,568 1,626 
Savings and money market197 22,698 22,895 
Time deposits(1,654)(133)(1,787)
Customer repurchase agreements51 56 
Other borrowings(6,735)223 (6,512)
Total interest expense(8,129)24,407 16,278 
Net interest income$12,118 $(11,179)$939 

Provision for Credit Losses


The provision for credit losses represents the amount of expense charged to current earnings to fund the allowance for credit losses.ACL on loans and the ACL on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities. The amount of the allowance for credit losses on loans is based on many factors which reflect management’smanagement's assessment of the riskcurrent expected credit losses in the loan portfolio. Those factors include historical losses based on internal and peer data, economic conditions and trends, the value and adequacy of collateral, volume and mix of the portfolio, performance of the portfolio, and internal loan processes of the Company and Bank.

The provision for unfunded commitments is presented separately on the consolidated statements of income. This provision considers the probability that unfunded commitments will fund among other factors.
Management has developed a comprehensive analytical process to monitordetermines the adequacyestimate of the ACL using a CECL model. Our methodology for determining our allowance for credit losses. The process and guidelines werewas developed utilizing, among other factors, the guidance from federal banking regulatory agencies. The results of this process, in combination with conclusionsagencies, relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.
We develop our estimate of the Bank’s outsideACL from several sources: (i) a quantitative model that determines expected credit losses using a probability of default ("PD") / Loss Given Default ("LGD") cash flow methodology, using internal and third-party provided peer historical loss data and adjustments to account for loan-specific risk characteristics after pooling our loan portfolio based on similar risk characteristics, i.e., call codes; (ii) individual evaluation of any loans that exhibit evidence of credit deterioration, excluded from the quantitative model; (iii) the application of qualitative and environmental factors as determined by management.
47


We utilize the following qualitative and environmental factors in our CECL methodology: (i) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio; (ii) changes in the volume and severity of past due financial assets and the volume and severity of adversely classified assets; (iii) changes in the value of underlying collateral for loans not individually evaluated; (iv) changes in lending policies and procedures; (v) changes in the quality of credit review consultant, support management’s assessment asfunction; (vi) changes in lending management and staff; (vii) concentrations of credit; (viii) other external factors (competition, legal, regulatory, etc.); and (ix) changes in national, regional, and local economic and business conditions. Our model may reflect assumptions by management that are not covered by the qualitative and environmental factors, and reevaluates all of its factors quarterly.
Refer to additional detail regarding these forecasts in the "Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans" section of Note 1 to the adequacy of the allowance at the balance sheet date. Please refer to the discussion under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies” for an overview of the methodology management employs on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of the allowance and the provisions charged to expense. Also, refer to the table at page 60, which reflects activity in the allowance for credit losses.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017,2022, the allowance for credit losses increased $1.9ACL on loans reflected a provision of $3.0 million reflecting $1.9 million in provision for credit losses and $2$56 thousand in net charge-offs during the period.recoveries. The provision for credit losses was $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $2.3 millionon loans for the same period in 2016. The lower provisioning2021 reflected a reversal of $8.3 million and $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2017, as compared to the third quarter of 2016, is primarily due to lower net charge-offs and to overall improved asset quality. Net charge-offs of $2 thousand in the third quarter of 2017 represented an annualized 0.00% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, as compared to $2.0 million, or an annualized 0.14% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, in the third quarter of 2016.

charge-offs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022, the allowance for credit losses increased $3.9 million, reflecting $4.9 million inACL on loans reflected a provision for credit lossesof $532 thousand and $991 thousand in net charge-offs during the period.recoveries of $270 thousand. The provision for credit losses was $4.9 millionon loans for the same nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $9.2month period in 2021 was a reversal of $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The lower provisioning in ACL and $12.2 million in net charge-offs. For the first nine months of 2017, as compared2022, the provisions were primarily driven by adjustments to the first nine monthsqualitative components of 2016, is duethe CECL model owing to a combination of lower net-charge-offs, lower loan growth, as net loans increased $406.3 million during the first nine months of 2017, as compared to an increase of $483.6 million duringhigh inflationary environment and the related uncertainty and impacts on the broader economy, offset by improvements in asset quality. The reversal in the same period in 2016, and to overall2021 was driven by the improved asset quality. Net charge-offsmacroeconomic outlook, improvement of $991 thousandcredits in the first nine months of 2017 represented an annualized 0.02% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale, as compared to $5.0 million or an annualized 0.13% of average loans, excluding loans held for sale,loan portfolio and a reduction in the first nine months of 2016.

total loans.

As part of its comprehensive loan review process, the Bank’s Board of Directorsinternal loan and Loan Committee or Credit Review Committeecredit committees carefully evaluate loans whichthat are past-due 30 days or more. The Committees make a thorough assessment of the conditions and circumstances surrounding each delinquent loan. The Bank’sBank's loan policy requires that loans be placed on nonaccrual if they are ninety90 days past-due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, Credit Administration specifically analyzes the status of development and construction projects, sales activities and utilization of interest reserves in order to carefully and prudently assess potential increased levels of risk requiring additional reserves.

The maintenance of a high quality loan portfolio, with an adequate allowance for possible credit losses, will continue to be a primary management objective for the Company.

The Company's goal is to mitigate risks in the event of unforeseen threats to the loan portfolio as a result of economic downturn or other negative influences. Plans for mitigating inherent risks in managing loan assets include carefully enforcing loan policies and procedures, evaluating each borrower's business plan during the underwriting process and throughout the loan term, identifying and monitoring primary and alternative sources for loan repayment, and obtaining collateral to mitigate economic loss in the event of liquidation.

48



The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated.

 Nine Months Ended September 30, 
(dollars in thousands) 2017  2016 
Balance at beginning of period $59,074  $52,687 
Charge-offs:        
Commercial  659   2,802 
Income producing - commercial real estate  1,470   2,342 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate      
Real estate mortgage - residential      
Construction - commercial and residential  39    
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)      
Home equity     217 
Other consumer  98   37 
Total charge-offs  2,266   5,398 
         
Recoveries:        
Commercial  675   93 
Income producing - commercial real estate  80   14 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  2   2 
Real estate mortgage - residential  5   5 
Construction - commercial and residential  491   207 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)      
Home equity  4   11 
Other consumer  18   24 
Total recoveries  1,275   356 
Net charge-offs  991   5,042 
Provision for Credit Losses  4,884   9,219 
Balance at end of period $62,967  $56,864 
         
Annualized ratio of net charge-offs during the period  to average loans outstanding during the period  0.02%  0.13%

Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$74,965 $109,579 
Charge-offs:
Commercial(604)(7,691)
Income producing - commercial real estate— (5,216)
Owner occupied - commercial real estate(1,356)— 
Construction - commercial and residential— (206)
Other consumer(74)(1)
Total charge-offs(2,034)(13,114)
Recoveries:
Commercial648 326 
Income producing - commercial real estate— 97 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate25 — 
Construction - commercial and residential1,627 499 
Other consumer17 
Total recoveries2,304 939 
Net recoveries (charge-offs)270 (12,175)
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses- loans532 (14,498)
Balance at end of period$75,767 $82,906 
Annualized ratio of net (recovery) charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period— %0.22 %

The following table reflects the allocation of the allowance for credit losses at the dates indicated. The allocation of the allowance to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses or charge-offs and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any category.

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
(dollars in thousands) Amount  % (1)  Amount  % (1)  Amount  % (1) 
Commercial $11,844   20% $14,700   21% $12,761   21%
Income producing - commercial real estate  22,375   48%  21,105   44%  20,509   46%
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  5,462   12%  4,010   12%  4,261   11%
Real estate mortgage - residential  957   2%  1,284   3%  1,110   3%
Construction - commercial and residential  19,686   15%  15,002   16%  14,681   15%
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)  1,200   1%  1,485   2%  1,833   2%
Home equity  1,097   2%  1,328   2%  1,369   2%
Other consumer  346      160      340    
Total allowance $62,967   100% $59,074   100% $56,864   100%

(1) Represents the percent of loans in each category to total loans.



September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Amount% of Total ACL% of Total LoansAmount% of Total ACL% of Total Loans
Commercial$15,873 21 %19 %$14,475 19 %19 %
PPP loans— — %— %— — %%
Income producing - commercial real estate36,327 48 %50 %38,287 51 %48 %
Owner occupied - commercial real estate12,581 16 %15 %12,146 16 %15 %
Real estate mortgage - residential810 %%449 %%
Construction - commercial and residential9,514 13 %12 %9,099 12 %13 %
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)— — %%— — %%
Home equity624 %%474 %%
Other consumer38 — %— %35 — %— %
Total allowance$75,767 100 %100 %$74,965 100 %100 %

Nonperforming Assets

As shown in the table below, the Company’sCompany's level of nonperforming assets, which is comprised ofcomprise loans delinquent 90 days or more, and nonaccrual loans, which includesinclude the nonperforming portion of TDRs and OREO, totaled $18.0$9.6 million at September 30, 20172022 representing 0.24%0.09% of total assets, as compared to $20.6$30.8 million of nonperforming assets, or 0.30%0.26% of total assets, at December 31, 2016 and $27.5 million of nonperforming assets, or 0.41% of total assets, at2021.
49


At September 30, 2016. The2022, the Company had no accruing loans 90 days or more past due at September 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 or September 30, 2016.due. Management remains attentive to early signs of deterioration in borrowers’borrowers' financial conditions and to taking the appropriate action to mitigate risk. Furthermore, the Company is diligent in placing loans on nonaccrual status and believes, based on its loan portfolio risk analysis, that its allowance for credit losses, at 1.03%1.04% of total loans at September 30, 2017,2022, is adequate to absorb potentialexpected credit losses within the loan portfolio at that date.

Included

CECL allows for institutions to evaluate individual loans in nonperforming assets are loansthe event that the asset does not share similar risk characteristics with its original segmentation. This can occur due to credit deterioration, increased collateral dependency or other factors leading to impairment. In particular, the Company considers to be impaired. Impairedindividually evaluates loans on nonaccrual status and those identified as TDRs, though it may individually evaluate other loans or groups of loans as well if it determines they no longer share similar risk with their assigned segment. Reserves on individually assessed loans are defined as those as to which we believe itdetermined by one of two methods: the fair value of collateral or the discounted cash flow. Fair value of collateral is probable that we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, as well as those loans whose terms have been modified in a TDR that have not shown a period of performance as required under applicable accounting standards. Valuation allowancesused for those loans determined to be impaired are evaluated in accordance with ASC Topic 310—”Receivables,” and updated quarterly. For collateral dependent, impaired loans,and the carrying amountfair value represents the net realizable value of the loan is determined by current appraised value less estimatedcollateral, adjusted for sales costs, to sellcommissions, senior liens, etc. The continuing payments are discounted over the underlying collateral, which may be adjusted downward under certain circumstancesexpected life at the loan's original contract rate and include adjustments for actual events and/or changes in market conditions. For example, current average actual selling prices less average actual closing costs on an impaired multi-unit real estate project may indicate the need for an adjustment in the appraised valuationrisk of the project, which in turn could increase the associated ASC Topic 310 specific reserve for the loan. Generally, all appraisals associated with impaired loans are updated on a not less than annual basis.

default.

Loans are considered to have been modified in a TDR when, due to a borrower’sborrower's financial difficulties, the Company makes unilateral concessions to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions could include interest rate reductions, principal or interest forgiveness, forbearance, and other actions intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Alternatively, management, from time-to-time and in the ordinary course of business, implements renewals, modifications, extensions, and/or changes in terms of loans to borrowers who have the ability to repay on reasonable market-based terms, as circumstances may warrant. Such modifications are not considered to be TDRs, as the accommodation of a borrower’sborrower's request does not rise to the level of a concession if the modified transaction is at market rates and terms and/or the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulty. For example: (1) adverse weather conditions may create a short term cash flow issue for an otherwise profitable retail business whichthat suggests a temporary interest onlyinterest-only period on an amortizing loan; (2) there may be delays in absorption on a real estate project whichthat reasonably suggests extension of the loan maturity at market terms; or (3) there may be maturing loans to borrowers with demonstrated repayment ability who are not in a position at the time of maturity to obtain alternate long-term financing. The most common change in terms provided by the Company is an extension of an interest only term. The determination of whether a restructured loan is a TDR requires considerationconsideration of all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the change in terms, and the exercise of prudent business judgment.
The Company had five TDRs at September 30, 2022 totaling approximately $24.5 million. All of these loans are performing under their modified terms.The Company had thirteen TDR’sseven TDRs at September 30, 2017December 31, 2021, totaling approximately $13.2$16.5 million. NineFor the first nine months of these loans, totaling approximately $12.3 million, are performing under2022 there were no TDRs that defaulted on their modified terms. During the nine months ended September 30, 2022, four loans that had been modified as TDRs with a balance of 2017, there was one default$30.3 million, including two that previously were on nonperforming status, were sold, resulting in a $237 thousand restructured loan which was charged off, as compared tocharge-off of $1.4 million in connection with the same period in 2016, which had one default on a $5.0 million restructured loan. A default is considered to have occurred once the TDR is past due 90 days or more or it has been placed on nonaccrual. Theresale. No TDRs were two nonperforming TDRs totaling $588 thousand reclassified to nonperforming loanssold during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017. There was one nonperforming TDR totaling $5.0 million reclassified to nonperforming loans during2021. For the first nine months ended September 30, 2016. of 2021, one performing TDR loan, with a balance of $101 thousand, defaulted on its modified terms and was placed on nonaccrual status and charged off. In addition, the collateral for one previously nonperforming restructured loan was sold, and all of the loan's principal and part of its delinquent interest were collected; and one restructured loan that was purchased as part of the 2014 acquisition of Virginia Heritage Bank was collected at its full carrying value.
Commercial and consumer loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Company evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. There were two loans totaling $251 thousand modified in a TDR during the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016 which had one loan totaling $801 thousand modified in a TDR.

Total nonperforming loans amounted to $16.6$7.6 million at September 30, 2017 (0.27%2022 (0.10% of total loans), compared to $17.9$29.2 million at December 31, 2016 (0.31% of total loans) and $22.3 million at September 30, 20162021 (0.41% of total loans). The decrease in the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans at September 30, 2017 as compared to September 30, 2016 was due to a decrease in the level of nonperforming loans.


Included in nonperforming assets at September 30, 2017 was $1.4 million of OREO, consisting of one foreclosed property. The Company had three foreclosed properties with a net carrying value of $2.7 million at December 31, 2016 and three foreclosed properties with a net carrying value of $5.2 million at September 30, 2016. OREO properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. It is the Company’sCompany's policy to obtain third party appraisals prior to foreclosure, and to obtain updated third party appraisals on OREO properties generally not less frequently than annually. Generally, the Company would obtain updated appraisals or evaluations where it has reason to believe, based upon market indications (such as comparable sales, legitimate offers below carrying value, broker indications and similar factors), that the current appraisal does not accurately reflect current value. OREO properties had a lower of cost or fair market value of $2.0 million and $1.6 million at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. During the first nine months of 2017, three foreclosed properties with a net carrying value of $2.5 million were sold for a net loss of $301 thousand. The decrease in OREO for theand nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to2022, an OREO property was sold, generating proceeds of $241 thousand. There were no sales of OREO property during the same period in 2016 is due to the sale of two OREO properties.

three or nine months ended September 30, 2021.

50


The following table shows the amounts of nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.

  September 30,  December 31, 
(dollars in thousands) 2017  2016  2016 
Nonaccrual Loans:            
Commercial $3,242  $2,986  $2,521 
Income producing - commercial real estate  880   10,098   10,508 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  6,570   2,103   2,093 
Real estate mortgage - residential  301   562   555 
Construction - commercial and residential  4,930   6,412   2,072 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)         
Home equity  594   113    
Other consumer  92      126 
Accrual loans-past due 90 days         
Total nonperforming loans (1)  16,609   22,274   17,875 
Other real estate owned  1,394   5,194   2,694 
Total nonperforming assets $18,003  $27,468  $20,569 
             
Coverage ratio, allowance for credit losses to total nonperforming loans  379.11%  255.29%  330.49%
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans  0.27%  0.41%  0.31%
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets  0.24%  0.41%  0.30%

(1)Nonaccrual loans reported in the table above include loans that migrated from performing troubled debt restructuring. There were two loans totaling $588 thousand that migrated from performing TDRs during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 where there was one loan totaling $5.0 million that migrated from performing TDR.

(dollars in thousands)September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Nonaccrual Loans:    
Commercial$3,018 $8,876 
PPP loans— 1,365 
Income producing - commercial real estate2,645 13,456 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate21 42 
Real estate mortgage - residential1,917 2,010 
Construction - commercial and residential— 3,093 
Home equity— 366 
Accruing loans-past due 90 days— — 
Total nonperforming loans7,601 29,208 
Other real estate owned1,962 1,635 
Total nonperforming assets$9,563 $30,843 
Coverage ratio, allowance for credit losses to total nonperforming loans997 %257 %
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans0.10 %0.41 %
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets0.09 %0.26 %
Significant variation in the amount of nonperforming loans may occur from period to period because the amount of nonperforming loans depends largely on the condition of a relatively small number of individual credits and borrowers relative to the total loan portfolio.

At September 30, 2017,2022, there were $18.8$89.7 million of performing loans considered to be potential problem loans, defined as loans that are not included in the 90 daydays past due, nonaccrual or restructured categories, but for which known information about possible credit problems causes management to be uncertain as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms, which may in the future result in disclosure in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured loan categories. The $18.8 million in potentialPotential problem loans at September 30, 2017 compared to $16.9were $88.6 million at December 31, 2016, and $8.7 million at September 30, 2016. The Company has taken a conservative posture with respect to risk rating its loan portfolio.2021. Based upon their status as potential problem loans, these loans receive heightened scrutiny and ongoing intensive risk management. Additionally, the Company’s loan loss allowance methodology incorporates increased reserve factors for certain loans considered potential problem loans as compared to the general portfolio. See “Provision for Credit Losses” for a description of the allowance methodology.


Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income includes service charges on deposits, gain on sale of loans, gain on sale of investment securities, loan servicingFHA multi-family income, income from BOLIbank owned life insurance ("BOLI") and other income.

Total noninterest income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 increased2022 decreased to $6.8$5.3 million from $6.4$8.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016,2021, a 6% increase, due substantially to income of $780 thousand36.0% decrease. Gain on the origination, securitization, servicing and sale of FHA Multifamily-Backed GNMA securities inloans for the third quarter of 2017, offset by lower sales of residential mortgage loans andthree months ended September 30, 2022 decreased to $821 thousand from $3.3 million for the resulting gainsthree months ended September 30, 2021, a 75.4% decrease. Gains on the sale of these loans (gain of $1.8investment securities decreased to $4 thousand from $1.5 million, or 99.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2022. Residential mortgage loan locked commitments were $57.5 million for the third quarter of 2017 versus $2.9three months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to $279.8 million for the same period in 2016). There was no income related to FHA Multifamily-Backed GNMA securities2021, a 79.4% decrease. The rise in the third quarter of 2016. The portfolio sale of $37.0 million ininterest rates for residential mortgages outin 2022 has had a negative impact on the volume of mortgage originations and in turn the loan portfolio resulted in $168 thousand in revenue during the third quarter of 2017. There was no income related to portfolio salessale of residential mortgages outdeclined.
The decision whether to sell residential mortgage loans on a mandatory or best efforts lock basis is a function of multiple factors, including but not limited to overall market volumes of mortgage loan originations, forecasted "pull-through" rates of origination, loan underwriting and closing operational considerations, pricing differentials between the two methods, and availability and pricing of various interest rate hedging strategies associated with the mortgage origination pipeline. The Company continually monitors these factors to maximize profitability and minimize operational and interest rate risks.
Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2022 increased to $2.5 million from $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021, a 56.9% increase. This increase was primarily attributable to the $543 thousand increase in other loan portfolio duringincome, $189 thousand increase in miscellaneous income and $248 increase in gains on the third quarter of 2016. The sale of securitized loans.
51


Service charges on deposits for the guaranteed portionthree months ended September 30, 2022 increased to $1.3 million from $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021.
Gain on SBA loans resulted in $390sale of investment securities was $4 thousand in revenue duringfor the third quarter of 2017three months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $101 thousanda $1.5 million net gain on sale of investment securities for the same period in 2016. Other loan income was $771 thousand for the third quarter of 2017 compared2021, primarily due to $632 thousand for the samemarket volatility period in 2016. Residential mortgage loans closed were $135 million for the third quarter in 2017 versus $276 million for the third quarter of 2016. Excluding gains on sales of investment securities, noninterest income was $6.8 million in the third quarter of 2017 as compared to $6.4 million for the third quarter of 2016, an increase of 6%.

over period.

Total noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $19.92022 decreased to $18.3 million as compared to $20.3from $29.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016,2021, a 2%38.5% decrease. This was primarily due to fewer sales of SBA and residential mortgage loans resulting in a $785 thousand and $939 thousand decreased gain on the sale of these loans, respectively, and a $581 thousand decreased gainGain on sale of securities, offset by revenue associated with the origination, securitization, servicing, and sale of FHA Multifamily-Backed GNMA securities of $1.5 million and a $338 thousand increase in service charges on deposits. The portfolio sale of $37.0 million in residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio resulted in $168 thousand in revenue duringloans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. There was no revenue related2022 decreased to portfolio sales of residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio for the same period of 2016. Excluding investment securities net gains, total noninterest income was $19.3$3.2 million from $12.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to $19.1 million for2021, a 73.6% decrease. The decreases in gains on the same period in 2016, a 1% increase.

Service chargessale of residential mortgage loans and gains on deposit accounts increased by $195 thousand, or 14%, from $1.4 million forsale of investment securities primarily drove the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $1.6 million fordecline between the same period in 2017. Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $338 thousand, or 8%, from $4.3two periods. Residential mortgage loan locked commitments were $286.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20162022 as compared to $4.6$831.4 million for the same period in 2017.2021, a 65.6% decrease. The increaserise in interest rates for residential mortgages in the first nine months of 2022 had a substantial negative impact on the volume of mortgage originations and in turn the sale of residential mortgages declined.

Other income for the three and nine month periods was primarily related to increased transaction volume.

The Company originates residential mortgage loans and utilizes both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to sell those loans, servicing released. Sales of residential mortgage loans yielded gains of $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared2022 decreased to $2.9$9.5 million in the same period in 2016. Sales of residential mortgage loans yielded gains of $6.1from $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared2021, a 14.2% decrease. This decrease was primarily attributable to $7.1the $2.5 million reduction in the same period in 2016. Loans sold are subject to repurchase in circumstances where documentation is deficient or the underlying loan becomes delinquent or pays off within a specified period following loan funding and sale. The Bank considers these potential recourse provisions to be a minimal risk, but has established a reserve under generally accepted accounting principles for possible repurchases. There were no repurchases due to fraud by the borrower during the three months ended September 30, 2017. The reserve amounted to $95 thousand as of September 30, 2017 and is included in other liabilitiesgains on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bank does not originate “sub-prime” loans and has no exposure to this market segment.

The Company is an originatorsale of SBA loans and its practice is to sell the guaranteed portion of those loans at a premium. Income from this source was $390 thousand and $626 thousandsecuritized loans.

Service charges on deposits for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared2022 increased to $101 thousand and $1.4$4.0 million from $3.3 million for the three and nine month period in 2016. Activity in SBA loanmonths ended September 30, 2021.
Loss on sales to secondary markets can vary widely from quarter to quarter.

Netof investment gains were $542securities was $172 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 20172022 compared to $1.1a $2.1 million net gain on sale of investment securities for the same period in 2016.


Other income totaled $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of 66% due primarily to revenue associated with the origination, securitization, servicing and sale of FHA Multifamily-Backed Ginnie Mae securities of $780 thousand, gains of $168 thousand on the portfolio sale of $37.0 million in residential mortgages out of the loan portfolio, and an increase in other loan income of $139 thousand. ATM fees decreased to $350 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $376 thousand for the same period in 2016, a 7% decrease. Noninterest loan fees increased to $771 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $632 thousand for the same period in 2016, a 22% increase. Noninterest fee income totaled $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 an increase of $967 thousand, or 255%, over the balance for the same period in 20162021, primarily due to revenue associated with the sale of FHA Multifamily-Backed Ginnie Mae securities of $779 thousand.

Other income totaled $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to $5.2 million for the samemarket volatility period in 2016, an increase of 31% due primarily to revenue associated with the sale of FHA Multifamily-Backed Ginnie Mae securities of $1.5 million. ATM fees were $1.1 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, a decrease of $48 thousand or 4%. Noninterest loan fees increased to $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $2.1 million for the same period in 2016, a 14% increase. Noninterest fee income totaled $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 an increase of $1.9 million, or 178%, over the balance for the same period in 2016 primarily due to revenue associated with the sale of FHA loans of $1.5 million and higher investment income received on Small Business Investment Company investments during the first nine months of 2017 over the same period in 2016.

period.

Servicing agreements relating to the Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities program require the Company to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. The Company will generally recover funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements under the FHA insurance and guarantee program. However, in the meantime,interim, the Company must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Company must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Company would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At September 30, 2017, the Company had no funds advanced outstanding under FHA mortgage loan servicing agreements. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Company’sCompany's servicing portfolio experience delinquencies, the Company would be requiredrequired to dedicate cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

The Company originates residential mortgage loans and, pending market conditions and other factors outlined above, may utilize either or both "mandatory delivery" and "best efforts" forward loan sale commitments to sell those loans, servicing released. Loans sold are subject to repurchase in circumstances where documentation is deficient, the underlying loan becomes delinquent, or there is fraud by the borrower. Loans sold are subject to penalty if the loan pays off within a specified period following loan funding and sale. The Bank considers these potential recourse provisions to be a minimal risk, but has established a reserve under GAAP for possible repurchases. There were no repurchases due to fraud by the borrower during the nine months ended September 30, 2022. The reserve amounted to $37 thousand at September 30, 2022 and is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In addition to having participated in the PPP program, which has largely ceased since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is a long-time originator of SBA loans and its practice is to sell the guaranteed portion of those loans at a premium. There was $59 thousand of income from this source for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and $249 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $9 thousand and $291 thousand for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021. Activity in SBA loan sales to secondary markets can vary widely from quarter to quarter.
Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense includes salaries and employee benefits, premises and equipment expenses, marketing and advertising, data processing, legal, accounting and professional, FDIC insurance, and other expenses.

52


Total noninterest expensesexpense totaled $29.5$36.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to $28.8$36.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.2021, a 0.5% decrease. Total noninterest expensesexpense totaled $88.7$126.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to $85.2$109.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

2021, a 14.9% increase.

Salaries and employee benefits were $16.9$21.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to $17.1$22.1 million for the same period in 2016, a 1% decrease. Salaries and benefits cost decreases for the three month period were due primarily to2021, a decrease in employee benefit costs due to the prior year acceleration of restricted stock awards, offset by merit increases.$0.6 million or 2.7%. Salaries and employee benefits were $50.5$60.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to $49.2$63.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, a decrease of 5.4%. The primary reason for decrease for the first nine months of 2022 was the reduction of the $5.0 million accrual related to stock-based compensation awards and deferred compensation for our former CEO and Chairman in the first quarter of 2022. The accrual was originally recorded in the first quarter of 2019. At September 30, 2022, the Company's full time equivalent staff numbered 495 as compared to 509 at September 30, 2021.
Premises and equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, were $3.3 million and $9.9 million compared to $3.9 million and $11.1 million, respectively, of which premises expenses were $2.6 million and $7.9 million compared to $3.2 million and $9.3 million, respectively.
Marketing and advertising expenses totaled $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and $1.0 million for the same period in 2016, a 3% increase. Salaries and benefits cost increases for2021. For the nine month period were due primarily to increased merit and incentive compensation, offset by a decrease in employee benefit costs due to the prior year acceleration of restricted stock awards. At September 30, 2017, the Company’s full time equivalent staff numbered 471, as compared to 469 at December 31, 2016 and 464 at September 30, 2016.

Premises and equipment expenses amounted to $3.8 million for the three month periodsmonths ended September 30, 20172022, marketing and 2016, an increase of $60 thousand, or 2%. Premises and equipment expenses amountedadvertising expense was $3.4 million compared to $11.6$2.9 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 20172021. The increase for both the three and $11.4nine month periods were due to additional advertising, promotions and sponsorships.

Data processing expenses were $3.4 million and $9.1 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of 2%. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized $143 thousand and $365 thousand of sublease revenue as2022, respectively, compared to $126 thousand$2.9 million and $424 thousand$8.5 million for the same periods in 2016. The sublease revenue is accounted2021, respectively.
Legal, accounting and professional fees were $2.3 million and $6.0 million for asthe three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to $2.0 million and $8.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively, an increase of $311 thousand and a reduction to premisesdecrease of $2.5 million for the comparative periods, respectively. Legal fees and equipment expenses.


Marketingexpenditures were $227 thousand and advertising expense decreased to $732$357 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $8572022 and 2021, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021 legal fees and expenditures were $723 thousand and $3.1 million, respectively. Legal expenses were greater in 2021 primarily due to the previously disclosed governmental investigations and related subpoenas and document requests, as well as our defense of the previously disclosed class action lawsuit. The amount of legal fees and expenditures reported for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 are net of expected insurance coverage where we believe we have a high likelihood of recovery pursuant to our D&O insurance policies but does not include any offset for potential claims we may have in the future as to which recovery is impossible to predict at this time. See the "General" section for more information.

FDIC expenses were $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2016,2021, a decrease of 15%, primarily due16.9% decrease. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, FDIC expenses were $3.3 million compared to reduced digital and print advertising spend. Marketing and advertising expense increased to $2.9$5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20172021. The decreases for the first three and nine months of 2022 compared to the same periods in 2021 were due to a change in the institution's size, which improved metrics used in the calculation of fees.
The major components of other expenses include settlement expenses, broker fees, franchise taxes, director compensation and insurance expense. Other expenses increased to $3.1 million and $34.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, respectively, from $2.6$2.9 million and $9.5 million for the same periodperiods in 2016, a 13%2021, respectively, for increases of 8.5% and 259.0%, respectively.The increase primarily due to costs associated with expanded digital and print advertising and sponsorships.

Legal, accounting and professional fees increased to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $771 thousand in the same period in 2016, a 61% increase. Legal, accounting and professional fees increased to $3.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $2.8 million in2022 as compared to the same nine month period in 2016, a 24% increase. The increase in expense for the three month period2021 was primarily due to general bank consulting projects. Thethe increase in noninterest expense forassociated with the nine month period was primarily due to enhanced IT risk management$22.9 million settlement expense in connection with the settlements with the SEC and general bank consulting projects.

FDIC expenses increased to $929 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from $629 thousand for the same period in 2016. FDIC expenses decreased to $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $2.2 million for the same period in 2016. The increase for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was due to a larger assessment base. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was due to a change in the FDIC insurance premium formula for small institutions effective July 1, 2016, offsetting the effect of a larger assessment base.

Other expenses amounted to $3.8 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, an increase of 2%. The major components of cost in this category include broker fees, franchise taxes, core deposit intangible amortization, and insurance expenses. Other expenses amounted to $12.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $11.4 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of 7%, due primarily to an increase in broker fees of $983 thousand.

FRB.

The efficiency ratio, which measures the ratio of noninterestnoninterest expense to total revenue, was 37.49%40.59% for the third quarter of 2017,2022, as compared to 40.54%41.65% for the third quarter of 2016. 2021. For the first nine months of 2022, the efficiency ratio was 47.51% as compared to 39.78% for the same period in 2021. Refer to the "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section for additional detail and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures. The increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to the same nine month period in 2021 was primarily due to the increase in noninterest expense associated with the $22.9 million of settlement expenses in the second quarter, which were partially offset by the salary accrual reduction of $5.0 million related to stock-based compensation awards and deferred compensation for our former CEO and Chairman in the first quarter of 2022.
53


As a percentage of average assets, total noninterest expense (annualized) improved to 1.66%was 1.27% for the three months ended September 30, 20172022 as compared to 1.78%1.23% for the same period in 2016.2021. As a percentage of average assets, total noninterest expense (annualized) improved to 2.55%was 1.41% for the nine months ended September 30, 20172022 as compared to 2.73%1.26% for the same period in 2016. Cost control remains a significant operating objective2021. The increase for the nine month period was primarily due to the accrual of the Company.

$22.9 million of settlement expenses.

Income Tax Expense

The Company’sCompany's ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income (“("effective tax rate”rate") improved to 36.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 38.7% for the same period in 2016.2022 and 2021 was 24.2% and 25.4%, respectively. The Company’s effectivetotal tax rate decreased to 37.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 38.4% for the same period in 2016. The lower effective tax rateprovision for the three months ended September 30, 20172022 was due primarily$11.9 million, compared to tax credit investments in$14.8 million for the third quarter of 2017 and a lower state tax apportionment factor in the current year.three months ended September 30, 2021. The lower effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2022 was due28.1% as compared to 25.4% for the same period in 2021. The total tax credit investments, a lower state income tax apportionment factor, and the adoption of the new accounting guidance for share-based transactions. That guidance requires that all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies associated with share-based compensation be recognized as income tax expense or benefits in the income statement. Previously, tax effects resulting from changes in the Company’s stock price subsequent to the grant date were recorded directly to shareholders’ equity at the time of vesting or exercise. The adoption of this new standard (ASU 2016-09) resulted in a net $460 thousand, or $0.01 per basic common share, reduction to income tax expenseprovision for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

2022 was $38.6 million, compared to $46.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. The increase in the effective tax rates over the comparative nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 was due to the SEC and FRB penalties totaling $22.9 million that are not deductible for tax purposes. Tax provisions declined over the comparative three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, and 2021 due to decreases in pre-tax income period over period.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law by president Biden on August 16, 2022 which makes significant changes to the U.S. tax law, including the introduction of a corporate alternative minimum tax of 15% of the “adjusted financial statement income” of certain domestic corporations as well as a 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock repurchases by certain domestic corporations, effective for tax years beginning in 2023. The Company currently does not expect the tax-related provision of the Inflation Reduction Act to have a material impact on our financial results.
FINANCIAL CONDITION

Summary

Total assets at September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2021 were $7.39$10.7 billion a 9% increase as compared to $6.76and $11.8 billion, atrespectively. The decrease in total assets over the nine months ended September 30, 2016,2022 was primarily due to the decrease in total interest-bearing deposits with banks and a 7% increase as compared to $6.89 billion at December 31, 2016. Totalother short-term investments. The largest component of assets, total loans (excluding loans held for sale) were $6.08, had an amortized cost basis of $7.3 billion at September 30, 2017, an 11%2022, a 3.4% increase asfrom the balance at December 31, 2021. The increase in loans over the nine months ended September 30, 2022, was driven by growth from CRE loans and C&I loans. Additionally, the Bank reduced its PPP loans from $51.1 million at December 31, 2021 to $7.2 million at September 30, 2022 through the forgiveness process. Loans held for sale were $9.4 million at September 30, 2022, compared to $5.48$47.2 million at December 31, 2021, a 80.1% decrease due to a decline in production.
Investment securities, at amortized cost net of the allowance for credit losses, totaled $3.0 billion at September 30, 2016, and a 7% increase2022 as compared to $5.68$2.6 billion at December 31, 2016. Loans held2021, an increase of 13.1%, primarily due to excess liquidity being invested at greater amounts in higher earning assets in response to higher rates on investments available in the market. During the first quarter of 2022, we evaluated our securities portfolio and determined that certain securities will be maintained for sale amountedthe life of the instrument and made a decision to $26.0transfer $1.1 billion of securities designated as available-for-sale ("AFS") to held-to-maturity ("HTM"), including $237.0 million atof securities acquired in the first quarter of 2022 for which the intention to hold to maturity was finalized. The transferred securities had unrealized losses of $66.2 million, and, as of September 30, 20172022, $61.1 million remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and will be accreted ratably over the remaining lives of the securities through accumulated other comprehensive loss. The securities transferred were generally municipal bonds, corporate bonds, bonds that qualify for Community Reinvestment Act credit, and mortgage-backed securities with longer final maturity dates. At quarter-end, $1.1 billion, or 37.3% of the securities portfolio, was classified as compared to $78.1 million at September 30, 2016, a 67% decrease, and $51.6 million at December 31, 2016, a 50% decrease. The investment portfolio totaled $556.0 million at September 30, 2017, a 29% increase from the $430.7 million balance at September 30, 2016. As compared to December 31, 2016, the investment portfolio at September 30, 2017 increased by $17.9 million or 3%.

securities HTM.

TotalIn terms of funding, total deposits at September 30, 20172022 were $5.91$8.8 billion compared to deposits of $5.56 billion at September 30, 2016, a 6% increase, and deposits of $5.72down from $10.0 billion at December 31, 2016,2021, a 4% increase.decline of 12.2%. Total borrowed funds (excluding customer repurchase agreements) were $416.8$584.8 million and $369.7 million at September 30, 2017, $266.4 million at September 30, 2016,2022 and $216.5 million at December 31, 2016. We continue to work on expanding2021, respectively, the breadthincrease of which was driven by loan growth and depthdeposit outflows as a result of our existing relationships while we pursue building new relationships.

On July 26, 2016, the Company completed the sale of $150.0 million of its 5.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes, due August 1, 2026.

During the third quarter of 2017, $200.0 millionan increase in FHLB advances were borrowed as part of the overall asset liability strategy and to support loan growth. These advances remained outstandingdisintermediation driven primarily by an increase in interest rates.

Total shareholders' equity was $1.2 billion as of September 30, 2017, $100.02022, as compared to $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2021, a decrease of $131.0 million. The decrease in shareholders' equity was primarily a result of the increase in the overall interest rate environment, which created unrealized losses in investment securities available-for-sale, which are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, other comprehensive loss was increased by $196.4 million. This reduction was partially offset by retained earnings which included earnings of $98.7 million less dividends declared of these advances will mature$41.6 million.
54


The Company's capital ratios remain substantially in October 2017excess of regulatory minimum and buffer requirements. Regulatory ratios based on risk-weighted assets declined from the remaining $100.0 million will mature in March 2018.

Total shareholders’ equityprior quarter as non-risk weighted cash was moved into risk-weighted securities and loans. The total risk based capital ratio was 16.10% at September 30, 2017 increased 15%, to $934.0 million,2022, as compared to $815.6 million16.15% at December 31, 2021. The common equity tier 1 ("CET1") risk based capital ratio was 15.11% at September 30, 2016, and increased 11% from $842.8 million2022, as compared to 15.02% at December 31, 2016.2021. The increase in shareholders’ equitytier 1 risk based capital ratio was 15.11% at September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 201615.02% at December 31, 2021. The tier 1 leverage ratio was primarily the result of retained earnings. 11.55% at September 30, 2022, as compared to 10.19% at December 31, 2021.

The ratio of common equity to total assets was 12.63%11.39% at September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to 12.06%11.40% at December 31, 2021 as an increase in unrealized losses on investment securities AFS offset retained earnings growth over the nine months ended September 30, 2022. Book value per share was $38.02 at September 30, 2016 and 12.23%2022, a 10.1% decrease over $42.28 at December 31, 2016. The Company’s capital position remains substantially2021 also owing to the increase in excess of regulatory requirements for well capitalized status, with a total risk based capital ratio of 15.30% at September 30, 2017, as compared to 15.05% at September 30, 2016, and 14.89% at December 31, 2016.unrealized losses on investment securities AFS between the the period. In addition, the tangible common equity ratio was 11.35%10.52% at September 30, 2017,2022, as compared to 10.64%10.60% at December 31, 2021. Tangible book value per share was $34.77 at September 30, 2016 and 10.84%2022, a 10.8% decrease from $38.97 at December 31, 2016.

Effective January 1, 2015,2021. At September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, excluding the Company, Bank, and all other banks of similar size became subject to capital requirements. These requirements created a new required ratio for common equity Tier 1 (“CETI”) capital, increased the leverage and Tier 1 capital ratios, changed the risk weight of certain assets for purposesimpact of the risk-based capital ratios, created anbalance of accumulated other comprehensive losses, adjusted book value per share was $44.59 and $42.73, respectively, and adjusted tangible book value per share was $41.34 and $39.42, respectively. Refer to the "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section for additional capital conservation buffer over the required capital ratiosdetail and changed what qualifies as capital for purposesa reconciliation of meeting these various capital requirements. Under these standards, inGAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.

In order to be considered well-capitalized, the Bank must have a CETICET1 risk based capital ratio of 6.5% (new), a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 8.0% (increased from 6.0%), a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% (unchanged) and a leverage ratio of 5.0% (unchanged). The Company and the Bank meetexceed all these requirements includingand satisfy the full capital conservation buffer. Beginningbuffer of 2.5% of CET1 capital required to engage in 2016, failurecapital distribution. Failure to maintain the required capital conservation buffer would limit the ability of the Company and the Bank to pay dividends, repurchase shares or pay discretionary bonuses.


Loan Portfolio

Loans, net of amortized deferred fees and costs, at September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 20162021 by major category are summarized below.
September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
(dollars in thousands)Amount%Amount%
Commercial$1,415,998 19 %$1,354,317 19 %
PPP loans7,241 — %51,105 %
Income producing - commercial real estate3,668,720 50 %3,385,298 48 %
Owner occupied - commercial real estate1,091,283 15 %1,087,776 15 %
Real estate mortgage - residential71,731 %73,966 %
Construction - commercial and residential858,100 12 %896,319 13 %
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)139,238 %159,579 %
Home equity51,396 %55,811 %
Other consumer791 — %1,427 — %
Total loans7,304,498 100 %7,065,598 100 %
Less: allowance for credit losses(75,767)(74,965)
Net loans (1)
$7,228,731 $6,990,633 
(1)Excludes accrued interest receivable of $37.1 million and$38.6 million at September 30, 2016 are summarized by type as follows:

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
(dollars in thousands) Amount  %  Amount  %  Amount  % 
Commercial $1,244,184   20% $1,200,728   21% $1,130,042   21%
Income producing - commercial real estate  2,898,948   48%  2,509,517   44%  2,551,186   46%
Owner occupied - commercial real estate  749,580   12%  640,870   12%  590,427   11%
Real estate mortgage - residential  109,460   2%  152,748   3%  154,439   3%
Construction - commercial and residential *  915,493   15%  932,531   16%  838,137   15%
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)  55,828   1%  126,038   2%  104,676   2%
Home equity  101,898   2%  105,096   2%  106,856   2%
Other consumer  8,813      10,365      6,212    
Total loans  6,084,204   100%  5,677,893   100%  5,481,975   100%
Less: allowance for credit losses  (62,967)      (59,074)      (56,864)    
Net loans $6,021,237      $5,618,819      $5,425,111     
                         
*Includes land loans.                        

2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, which is recorded in other assets.

In its lending activities, the Company seeks to develop and expand relationships with clients whose businesses and individual banking needs will grow with the Bank. Superior customer service, local decision making, and accelerated turnaround time from application to closing have been significant factors in growing the loan portfolio and meeting the lending needs in the markets served, while maintaining sound asset quality.

55


Loans outstanding reached $6.08were $7.3 billion at September 30, 2017,2022, an increase of $602.2$238.9 million, or 11%3.4%, as compared to $5.48from the balance at December 31, 2021. PPP loans outstanding were $7.2 million at September 30, 2022, a decrease of $43.9 million, or 85.8%, from the $51.1 million at December 31, 2021. With PPP loans excluded, loans outstanding were $7.3 billion at September 30, 2016, and2022, an increase of $406.3$282.8 million or 7%, as compared to $5.68 billion atfrom December 31, 2016. 2021. Refer to the "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" section for additional detail and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.
The loan growth during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 over the same period in 2016 was predominantlyportfolio continued to grow in the income producing - commercial real estate, owner occupied - commercial real estate,third quarter of 2022, due primarily to our CRE and commercial and industrial categories. Despite an increased level of in-market competition for business,C&I loan originations. Market interest rates continue to increase in connection with rate increases implemented by the Bank continued to experience strong organic loan growth across the portfolio.Federal Reserve. Multi-family commercial real estate leasing in the Bank’sBank's market area hashave held up well, particularly for well-located close-in projects.projects close to the District of Columbia. Overall, commercial real estate values have generally held up well, but we continue to be cautious of the capitalization rates at which some assets are trading and as a result we are being cautious with price escalation in prime pockets. Theour valuations. Commercial loans meet reasonable underwriting standards, including appropriate collateral and cash flow necessary to support debt service. Valuations associated with the moderately priced housing market has remained stable tohave generally been increasing, with well-located, Metro accessibleMetro-accessible properties garnering a premium.

Owner occupied - We continue to believe that there are opportunities for growth in the commercial real estate market, as evidenced by the increase in CRE and construction - C&I (owner occupied) represent 13%loans over the quarter.

The following table sets forth the time to contractual maturity of the loan portfolio. The Bank has a large portionportfolio as of its loan portfolio related to real estate, with 76% consisting of commercial real estate and real estate construction loans. When owner occupied - commercial real estate and construction - C&I (owner occupied) is excluded, the percentage of total loans represented by commercial real estate decreases to 63%. Real estate also serves as collateral for loans made for other purposes, resulting in 85% of all loans being secured by real estate.

September 30, 2022:

September 30, 2022
(dollars in thousands)TotalOne Year or LessOver One Year to Five YearsOver Five Years to Fifteen YearsOver Fifteen Years
Commercial$1,415,998 $527,404 $716,502 $164,510 $7,582 
PPP loans7,241 2,457 4,784 — — 
Income producing - commercial real estate3,668,720 1,444,005 1,730,828 493,887 — 
Owner occupied - commercial real estate1,091,283 50,621 411,787 487,002 141,873 
Real estate mortgage - residential71,731 12,357 44,429 2,961 11,984 
Construction - commercial and residential858,100 368,826 446,636 27,259 15,379 
Construction - C&I (owner occupied)139,238 15,258 32,397 65,111 26,472 
Home equity51,396 2,978 5,895 906 41,617 
Other consumer791 264 358 — 169 
Total loans$7,304,498 $2,424,170 $3,393,616 $1,241,636 $245,076 
Loans with:
Predetermined fixed interest rate$2,910,601 $670,316 $1,434,121 $701,519 $104,645 
Floating or Adjustable interest rate4,393,897 1,753,854 1,959,495 540,117 140,431 
Total loans$7,304,498 $2,424,170 $3,393,616 $1,241,636 $245,076 

Deposits and Other Borrowings

The principal sources of funds for the Bank are core deposits, consisting of demand deposits, money market accounts, NOW accounts, and savings accounts. Additionally, the Bank obtainsaccounts and certificates of deposits from the local market areas surrounding the Bank’s offices.deposit. The deposit base includes transaction accounts, time and savings accounts and accounts, which customers use for cash management and which provide the Bank with a source of fee income and cross-marketing opportunities, as well as an attractive source of lower cost funds. To meet funding needs during periods of high loan demand and seasonal variations in core deposits, the Bank utilizes alternative funding sources such as secured borrowings from the FHLB, federal funds purchased lines of credit from correspondent banks and brokered deposits from regional and national brokerage firms and Promontory InterfinancialIntraFi Network, LLC (“Promontory”("IntraFi").

, secured borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the "FHLB"), and federal funds purchased lines of credit from correspondent banks.

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017, noninterest bearing2022, total deposits increased $67.5 milliondecreased by $1.2 billion as compared to December 31, 2016, while2021. The decline consists of $349.2 million in noninterest bearing deposits and in $869.0 million in interest bearing deposits increasedas a result of an increase of disintermediation driven primarily by $130.4 million during the same period. Average total deposits for the first nine months of 2017 were $5.68 billion, as compared to $5.23 billion for the same periodan increase in 2016, a 9% increase.

interest rates.

56

From time to time, when appropriate in order to fund strong loan demand, the



The Bank accepts brokered time deposits, generally in denominations of less than $250 thousand, from a regional brokerage firm, and other national brokerage networks, including Promontory.IntraFi. Additionally, the Bank participates in the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”(the "CDARS") and the Insured Cash Sweep product (“ICS”("ICS"), which providesprovide for reciprocal (“two-way”("two-way") transactions among banks facilitated by PromontoryIntraFi for the purpose of maximizing FDIC insurance. These reciprocal CDARS and ICS funds are classified as brokered deposits, although the federal banking agencies have recognized that these reciprocal deposits have many characteristics of core deposits and therefore provide for separate identification of such deposits in the quarterly Call Report data. The Bank also is able to obtain one wayone-way CDARS deposits and participates in Promontory’sIntraFi's Insured Network Deposit (“IND”("IND"). At September 30, 2017,2022, total deposits included $883.5 million$2.5 billion of brokered deposits (excluding the CDARS and ICS two-way), which represented 15%28.0% of total deposits. At December 31, 2016,2021, total brokered deposits (excluding the CDARS and ICS two-way) were $676.7 million,$2.6 billion, or 12%26.5% of total deposits. The CDARS and ICS two-way component represented $493.4$728.7 million, or 8%8.3%, of total deposits and $432.1$701.5 million, or 8%7.0%, of total deposits at September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2016,2021, respectively. These sources are believed by the Company to represent a reliable and cost efficient alternative funding source for the Bank. However, to the extent that the condition, regulatory position or reputation of the Company or Bank deteriorates, or to the extent that there are significant changes in market interest rates which the Company and Bank do not elect to match, we may experience an outflow of brokered deposits. In that event, we would be required to obtain alternate sources for funding.

At September 30, 20172022, the Company had $1.84$2.9 billion in noninterest bearing demand deposits, representing 32%33% of total deposits, compared to $1.78$3.3 billion of noninterest bearing demand deposits at December 31, 2016,2021, or 31%33% of total deposits. TheseAverage noninterest bearing deposits are primarily business checking accounts on whichof total deposits for the payment of interest was prohibited by regulations of the Federal Reserve prior to July 2011. Since July 2011, banks are not prohibited from paying interest on demand deposits account, including those from businesses. To date, the Bank has elected not to pay interest on business checking accounts, nor is the payment of such interest a prevalent practice in the Bank’s market area at present.three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 were 38% and 34%, respectively. The Bank is preparedalso offers business NOW accounts and business savings accounts to evaluate optionsaccommodate those customers who may have excess short term cash to deploy in this area should competition intensify for these deposits, which is not occurring at this time. Payment of interest on these deposits could have a significant negative impact on the Company’s net interest income and net interest margin, net income, and the return on assets and equity, although no such effect is currently anticipated.

earning assets.

As an enhancement to the basic noninterest bearing demand deposit account, the Company offers a sweep account, or “customer"customer repurchase agreement," allowing qualifying businesses to earn interest on short-term excess funds whichthat are not suited for either a certificate of deposit or a money market account. The balances in these accounts were $73.6$21.5 million at September 30, 20172022 compared to $68.9$23.9 million at December 31, 2016.2021. Customer repurchase agreements are not deposits and are not insured by the FDIC, but are collateralized by U.S. agency securities and/or U.S. agency backed mortgage backedmortgage-backed securities. These accounts are particularly suitable to businesses with significant fluctuation in the levels of cash flows. Attorney and title company escrow accounts are examples of accounts which can benefit from this product, as are customers who may require collateral for deposits in excess of FDIC insurance limits but do not qualify for other pledging arrangements. This program requires the Company to maintain a sufficient investment securities level to accommodate the fluctuations in balances which may occur in these accounts.

At September 30, 2022 the Company had $649.2 million in time deposits a decrease of $79.8 million from year end December 31, 2021. The Bank raises and renews time deposits through its branch network, for its public funds customers, and through brokered certificates of deposits ("CDs") to meet the needs of its community of savers and as part of its interest rate risk management and liquidity planning. Throughout the year, the Bank raised rates in most of its time deposit accounts in response to the raising rate environment and the desire to maintain stability in its short term funding.
At September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company had time deposits that were in excess of the FDIC's $250 thousand insurance limit totaling $93.2 million and $152.5 million, respectively.
The Company had nohad an outstanding balancesbalance of $15 million under its federal funds lines of credit provided by correspondent banks (which are unsecured) at September 30, 20172022 and no outstanding balance at December 31, 2021. At September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2016. The Bank2021, the Company had $200.0$500 million inand $300 million, respectively, of FHLB short-term borrowings outstanding under its credit facility fromadvances borrowed as part of the FHLB at September 30, 2017. There were no borrowings outstanding under its credit facility from the FHLB at December 31, 2016.overall asset liability strategy and to support loan growth. Outstanding FHLB advances are secured by collateral consisting of a blanket lien on qualifying loans in the Bank’sBank's commercial mortgage, residential mortgage and home equity loan portfolios.

Long-term borrowings outstanding at September 30, 20172022 and December 31, 2021 included the Company’sCompany's August 5, 2014 issuance of $70.0 million of subordinated notes, due September 1, 2024 and the Company’s July 26, 2016 issuance of $150.0 million of subordinated notes, due August 1, 2026. For additional information on the subordinated notes, please refer to “Capital Resources and Adequacy” below.

2024.

57



Liquidity Management

Liquidity is a measure of the Company’sCompany's and Bank’sBank's ability to meet loan demand and to satisfy depositor withdrawal requirements in an orderly manner. The Bank’sBank's primary sources of liquidity consist of cash and cash balances due from correspondent banks, excess reserves at the Federal Reserve, loan repayments, federal funds sold and other short-term investments, maturities and sales of investment securities, income from operations and new core deposits into the Bank. The Bank’sApproximately 60% of the Company's investment portfolio of debt securities is held in an available-for-sale status which allows for flexibility, subject to holdings held as collateral for customer repurchase agreements and public funds, to generate cash from sales as needed to meet ongoing loan demand. These sources of liquidity are considered primary and are supplemented by the ability of the Company and Bank to borrow funds or issue brokered deposits, which are termed secondary sources of liquidity and which are substantial. The Company’s secondary sources of liquidity include
Additionally, the ability toBank can purchase up to $137.5$155 million in federal funds on an unsecured basis from its correspondents, against which there was no amount$15 million outstanding at September 30, 2017,2022, and access to borrowcan obtain unsecured funds under one-way CDARS and ICS brokered deposits in the amount of $1.11$1.6 billion, against which there was $176.9$19.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2017.2022. The Bank also has a commitment from PromontoryIntraFi to place up to $700.0 million$1.8 billion of brokered deposits from its IND program in amounts requested by the Bank, as compared to an actual balance of $291.1 million$1.4 billion at September 30, 2017.2022. At September 30, 20172022, the Bank was also eligible to make advances from the FHLB up to $1.27$1.1 billion based on loans pledged as collateral atto the FHLB, of which there was $200.0$500 million outstanding at September 30, 2017.2022. The Bank may enter into repurchase agreements as well as obtain additional borrowing capabilities from the FHLB, provided adequate collateral exists to secure these lending relationships. The Bank also has a back-up borrowing facility through the Discount Window at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“("Federal Reserve Bank”Bank"). This facility, which amounts to approximately $485.0$668 million, is collateralized with specific loan assets identified to the Federal Reserve Bank. It is anticipated that, except for periodic testing, this facility would be utilized for contingency funding only.

The loss of deposits through disintermediation is one of the greater risks to liquidity. Disintermediation occurs most commonly when rates rise and depositors withdraw deposits seeking higher rates in alternative savings and investment sources than the Bank may offer. The Bank was founded under a philosophy of relationship banking and, therefore, believes that it has less of an exposure to disintermediation and resultant liquidity concerns than do many banks. The Bank makes competitive deposit interest rate comparisons weekly and feels its interest rate offerings are competitive. There
As evidenced by recent increases in market rates, there is however, a risk that some deposits would be lost if rates were to increase and the Bank elected not to remain competitive with its deposit rates. Under those conditions, the Bank believes that it is well positioned to use other sources of funds such as FHLB borrowings, brokered deposits, repurchase agreements and correspondent banks’banks' lines of credit to offset a decline in deposits in the short run. Over the long-term, an adjustment in assets and change in business emphasis could compensate for a potential loss of deposits. The Bank also maintains a marketable investment portfolio to provide flexibility in the event of significant liquidity needs. The Asset Liability Committee of the Bank’sBank (the "ALCO") and the full Board of Directors (“ALCO”) hasof the Bank have adopted policy guidelines which emphasize the importance of core deposits, adequate asset liquidity and a contingency funding plan.

Additionally, as noted above, if the condition, regulatory treatment or reputation of the Company or Bank deteriorates, we may experience an outflow of brokered deposits as a result of our inability to attract them or to accept or renew them. In that event, we would be required to obtain alternate sources for funding.

The Company maintains sufficient primary and secondary sources of liquidity to fund its operations. Average deposits increased 6.4% for the first nine months of 2022 as compared to the same period in 2021. We also maintain a liquid investment portfolio outside of our Held-to-Maturity investments, including overnight liquidity. In the first nine months of 2022, average short term liquidity was $1.4 billion, which is above EagleBank's average needs, and secondary sources of liquidity at September 30, 2022 were $2.6 billion.
At September 30, 2017,2022, under the Bank’sBank's liquidity formula, it had $3.78$4.3 billion of primary and secondary liquidity sources. The amount is deemed adequate to meet current and projected funding needs.

58


Commitments and Contractual Obligations

Loan commitments outstanding and lines and letters of credit at September 30, 20172022 are as follows:

(dollars in thousands) September 30, 2017 
Unfunded loan commitments $2,447,076 
Unfunded lines of credit  93,334 
Letters of credit  70,767 
Total $2,611,177 

(dollars in thousands)
Unfunded loan commitments$2,223,503 
Unfunded lines of credit109,217 
Letters of credit101,407 
Total$2,434,127 

Unfunded loan commitments are agreements whereby the Bank has made a commitment and the borrower has accepted the commitment to lend to a customer as long as there is satisfaction of the terms or conditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee before the commitment period is extended. In many instances, borrowers are required to meet performance milestones in order to draw on a commitment as is the case in construction loans, or to have a required level of collateral in order to draw on a commitment as is the case in asset based lending credit facilities. Since commitments may expire without being drawn, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Unfunded loan commitments of $66.1 million asAs of September 30, 2017 were2022, unfunded loan commitments included $17.9 million related to interest rate lock commitments on residential mortgage loans and were of a short-term nature.

The pipeline of loan commitments remains strong.

Unfunded lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of the terms or conditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since commitments may expire without being drawn, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Letters of credit include standby and commercial letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance by the Bank’sBank's customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally become payable upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party. Standby letters of credit are generally not drawn. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and a third party. The contractual amount of these letters of credit represents the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Bank. The Bank has recourse against the customer for any amount it is required to pay to a third party under a letter of credit, and holds cash and or other collateral on those standby letters of credit for which collateral is deemed necessary.

Asset/Liability Management and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

A fundamental risk in banking is exposure to market risk, or interest rate risk, since a bank’sbank's net income is largely dependent on net interest income. The Bank’sBank's ALCO formulates and monitors the management of interest rate risk through policies and guidelines established by it and the full Board of Directors and through review of detailed reports discussed monthly.quarterly. In its consideration of risk limits, the ALCO considers the impact on earnings and capital, the level and direction of interest rates, liquidity, local economic conditions, outside threats and other factors. Banking is generally a business of managing the maturity and re-pricingrepricing mismatch inherent in its asset and liability cash flows and to provide net interest income growth consistent with the Company’sCompany's profit objectives.

During the quarternine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the same three months in 2016,2022, the Company was able to increase its net interest income (by 11%), produce a net interest spreadmargin of 3.77%, which was six basis points lower than the 3.83% for2.86% as compared to 2.91% during the same quarterperiod in 2016,2021 and continue to manage its overall interest rate risk position.

position.

The Company, through its ALCO and ongoing financial management practices, monitors the interest rate environment in which it operates and adjusts the rates and maturities of its assets and liabilities to remain competitive and to achieve its overall financial objectives subject to established risk limits. In the current and expected future interest rate environment, the Company has been maintaining its investment portfolio to manage the balance between yield and prepayment risk in its portfolio of mortgage backed securities should interest rates remain at current levels.of mortgage-backed securities. Further, the Company has been managing the investment portfolio to mitigate extension riskprovide liquidity and related declines in market values in that same portfolio should interest rates increase.some additional yield over cash. Additionally, the Company has limited call risk in its U.S. agency investment portfolio. During the three months endedAt September 30, 2017,2022, the average investment portfolio balances increased by $345.9 million, or 13.1%, as compared to balancesthe balance at September 30, 2016. The cash received from deposit growth and borrowings along with cash flows off of the investment portfolio were deployed into loans and the purchase of additional investments.

December 31, 2021.

59


The percentage mix of municipal securities was 11%5% of total investments at September 30, 20172022 and 23% at September 30, 2016, theDecember 31, 2021. The portion of the portfolio invested in mortgage backed securities decreased to 54%mortgage-backed securities was 64% at September 30, 2017 from 60% at September 30, 2016.2022 and December 31, 2021. The portion of the portfolio invested in U.S. agency investments was 25% and 24% at September 30, 20172022 and 13% at September 30, 2016.December 31, 2021, respectively. Shorter duration floating rate SBA bonds and corporate bonds were 11%4% and 5% of total investments at September 30, 20172022 and 5%December 31, 2021, respectively. U.S. treasury bonds were 2% of total investments at September 30, 2016. Despite the rolling forward of the investment portfolio2022 and the changing mix through the purchase of shorter duration instruments (inclusive of shorter U.S. agency investments), theDecember 31, 2021. The duration of the investment portfolio was 3.5increased to 4.8 years at September 30, 2017 and 3.42022 from 4.3 years at September 30, 2016, owing to slower prepayment speeds on mortgage back securities, but those cash flows still position the Company well for expected increases in market interest rates.

December 31, 2021.

The re-pricing duration of the loan portfolio was fairly stable at 22 monthswas 14 months at September 30, 2017 versus 232022 and 18 months at September 30, 2016,December 31, 2021 with fixed rate loans amounting to 34%40% of total loans at both September 30, 20172022 and 2016.43% at December 31, 2021. Variable and adjustable rate loans comprised 66%60% of total loans at both September 30, 20172022 and September 30, 2016.57% at December 31, 2021, respectively. Variable rate loans are generally indexed to either the one month LIBOR interest rate, SOFR, or the Wall Street Journal prime interest rate, while adjustable rate loans are generally indexed primarily to the five year U.S. TreasuryTreasury interest rate.


The duration of the deposit portfolio decreased to 20 monthsas rates rose, measuring 30 months at September 30, 2017 from 282022 and 41 months at September 30, 2016. The change since September 30, 2016 was due substantially to a change in the mix and duration of money market deposits.

The Company has continued its emphasis on funding loans in its marketplace, and has been able to achieve favorable loan pricing, including interest rate floors on many loan originations, although competition for new loans persists. A disciplined approach to loan pricing, together with loan floors existing in 61% of total loans (at September 30, 2017), has resulted in a loan portfolio yield of 5.19% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 5.08% for the same period in 2016. Subject to interest rate floors, variable and adjustable rate loans provide additional income opportunities should interest rates rise from current levels.

December 31, 2021.

The net unrealized loss before income tax on the investment securities available-for-sale portfolio was $1.7$224.1 million and $18.6 million at September 30, 2017 as compared2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The change is primarily due to a net unrealized gain before tax of $7.4 million at September 30, 2016. The net unrealized loss on the investment portfolio at September 30, 2017 as compared to the net unrealized gain at September 30, 2016 was due primarily to the higher interest rates at September 30, 2017 and the sale of more valuable municipal bonds in the first quarter of 2017.rates. At September 30, 2017,2022, the net unrealized loss positionposition represented 0.3%8% of the investment portfolio’sportfolio's book value.

Management relies on the use of models in order to measure the expected future impact on interest income of various interest rate environments, as described above. Through its modeling, the Company makes certain estimates that may vary from actual results. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully achieve its optimal asset liability mix, as a result ofgiven competitive pressures, customer preferences and the inability to perfectly forecast future interest rates and movements.

movements with complete accuracy.

In a normal rising interest rate environment, the Company expects its interest income on variable and adjustable rate loans to increase and the interest expense on its deposit liabilities to increase based on our funding needs, market conditions and certain contractual obligations. Interest rate floors on certain of the Company's variable and adjustable rate loans may provide asset yield protection in a low-interest rate environment; however, they are also expected to delay the impact of increases to market rates on interest income until such floors have been exceeded. The weighted average rate of the Company's variable rate loans increased by approximately 179 basis points from December 31, 2021 to September 30, 2022 in connection with the 300 basis points in Fed Funds rate hikes caused by actions taken by the Federal Reserve Bank. At December 31, 2021, the Company had a portfolio of $2.8 billion of variable and adjustable rate loans that were subject to interest rate floors with a weighted average rate of 4.30%. At September 30, 2022, only $278.4 million of loans held by the Company were earning interest at their floor rate, and the majority of those are expected to reset at rates higher than their floor at their next rate reset date. Additionally, the Company’s cost of interest bearing deposits increased by 157 basis points across its interest-bearing deposits, which comprise 67% of its total deposits, at September 30, 2022.
One of the tools used by the Company to manage its interest rate risk is athe static GAPgap analysis presented below. The Company also employs an earnings simulation model on a quarterly basis to monitor its interest rate sensitivity and risk and to model its balance sheet cash flows and the related income statement effects in different interest rate scenarios. The model utilizes current balance sheet data and attributes and is adjusted for assumptions as to investment maturities (including prepayments), loan prepayments, interest rates, deposit decay rates, and the level of noninterest income and noninterest expense. The data is then subjected to a “shock test”"shock test" which assumes a simultaneous change in interest rates up 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points or down 100 and 200, along the entire yield curve, but not below zero. The results are analyzed as to the impact on net interest income, net income and the market equity over the next twelve and twenty-four month periodsperiod from September 30, 2017.2022. In addition to analysis of simultaneous changes in interest rates along the yield curve, changes based on interest rate “ramps”"ramps" is also performed. This analysis represents the impact of a more gradual change in interest rates, as well as yield curve shape changes.

60


For the analysis presented below, at September 30, 2017,2022, the simulation assumes a 5045 basis point change in interest rates on money market and interest bearing transaction deposits for each 100 basis point change in market interest rates in a decreasing interest rate shock scenario with a floor of 0 basis points (compared to a floor 10 basis points in the same analysis as of September 30, 2021), and assumes a 7045 basis point change in interest rates on money market and interest bearing transaction deposits for each 100 basis point change in market interest rates in an increasing interest rate shock scenario.

As quantified The Bank does have deposits with contractual terms which means these deposits will change 100 basis points for every 100 basis points change in market rates. This had the table below,effect of making the Company’soverall measure of the correlation between deposit costs and market rate changes be measured at 70%.

The Company's analysis at September 30, 20172022 shows a change inmoderate effect on net interest income (over the next 12 months) as well as a moderate effect on the economic value of equity when interest rates are shocked both down 100, 200, and 200300 basis points and up 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points. This moderate impact is due substantially to the significant level of variable rate and re-priceablerepriceable assets and liabilities and related shorter relative durations.durations. The re-pricingrepricing duration of the investment portfolio at September 30, 20172022 is 3.54.5 years, the loan portfolio 1.81.2 years, the interest bearing deposit portfolio 1.72.5 years, and the borrowed funds portfolio 2.40.4 years.

The following table reflects the result of simulation analysis on the September 30, 20172022 asset and liabilities balances:

Change in interest
rates (basis points)
  Percentage change in
net interest income
 Percentage change in
net income
 Percentage change in
market value of
portfolio equity
 +400   +21.8%  +40.8%  +10.6%
 +300   +16.2%  +30.3%  +7.4%
 +200   +10.7%  +20.0%  +4.8%
 +100   +5.1%  +9.7%  +2.4%
 0       
 -100   -5.5%  -10.2%  -1.5%
 -200   -13.8%  -23.3%  -2.6%

Change in interest
rates (basis points)
Percentage change in net
interest income
Percentage change in
net income
Percentage change in
market value of portfolio
equity
+40019.5%33.1%5.1%
+30014.9%25.3%4.6%
+20010.3%17.5%3.8%
+1005.7%9.7%2.6%
-100(4.9)%(8.3)%(4.3)%
-200(10.2)%(17.3)%(11.5)%
-300(13.5)%(22.9)%(21.8)%

Considering the likelihood of general market interest rate changes, the

The results of the simulation are deemed to be within the relevant policy limits adopted by the Company.Company for percentage change in net interest income. For net interest income, the Company has adopted a policy limit of -10% for a 100 basis point change, -12% for a 200 basis point change, -18% for a 300 basis point change and -24% for a 400 basis point change. For the market value of equity, the Company has adopted a policy limit of -12% for a 100 basis point change, -15% for a 200 basis point change, -25% for a 300 basis point change and -30% for a 400%400 basis point change. Due to a very low probability of further declines in market interest rates, ALCO and management have accepted the policy exception associated with the percentage of net interest income lost in a down 200 basis points scenario. The changes in net interest income, net income and the economic value of equity in both a higher and lower interest rate shock scenarioscenarios at September 30, 20172022 are not considered to be excessive. The positive impact of +5.1%-4.9% in net interest income and +9.7%-8.3% in net income given a 100 basis point increasedecrease in market interest rates reflects in large measure the impact of variable rateability to quickly reprice deposits downward while the new loans and fed funds sold repricing counteracted by a lower level of expected residential mortgage activity.

we have book recently would take time to re-price. In the third quarter first three quarters of 2017, the2022, the Company continued to manage its interest rate sensitivity position to moderate levels of risk, as indicated in the simulation results above. Except for the higher level of asset liquidity at September 30, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016, the interest rate risk position at September 30, 2017 was similar to the interest rate risk position at December 31, 2016. As compared to December 31, 2016, the sum of federal funds sold, interest bearing deposits with banks and other short-term investments and loans held for sale increased by $57.2 million at September 30, 2017.

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although

Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or repricing periods, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that limit changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the loan. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.modeling. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a significant interest rate increase.

During the third quarterfirst three quarters of 2017,2022, average market interest rates increased on the short end of the yield curve while decreasing on the mid and long end of the curve. Overall, there was a flattening ofacross the yield curve as compared to the third quarter of 2016 with rate increases within the three2021 year maturity term and decreases further out on the yield curve.

As compared to the third quarter of 2016, the average two-year U.S. Treasury rate increased by 6 basis points from 1.30% to 1.36%, the average five year U.S. Treasury rate was stable at 1.81% and the average ten year U.S. Treasury rate decreased by 2 basis points from 2.26% to 2.24%. The Company’s net interest spread for the third quarter of 2017 was 3.77% compared to 3.83% for the third quarter of 2016. The decline was due in large part to the increase in the cost of interest bearing liabilities. The Company believes that the change in the net interest spread in the most recent quarter as compared to 2016’s third quarter has been consistent with its risk analysis at December 31, 2016.

GAPend.

61


Gap Position

Banks andand other financial institutions earnings are significantly dependent upon net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on earningrate sensitive assets and interest expense on rate sensitive liabilities. Net interest bearing liabilities. This revenueincome represented 91%93% and 89% of the Company’sCompany's revenue for the third quarterfirst three quarters of both 20172022 and 2016.

the last three quarters 2021, respectively.

In falling interest rate environments, net interest income is maximized with longer term, higher yielding assets being funded by lower yielding short-term funds, or what is referred to as a negative mismatch or GAP.gap. Conversely, in a rising interest rate environment, net interest income is maximized with shorter term, higher yielding assets being funded by longer-term liabilities or what is referred to as a positive mismatch or GAP.

gap.

The GAPgap position, which is a measure of the difference in maturity and repricing volume between assets and liabilities, is a means of monitoring the sensitivity of a financial institution to changes in interest rates. The charttable below provides an indication of the sensitivity of the Company to changes in interest rates. A negative GAP indicatesgap indicates the degree to which the volume of repriceable liabilities exceeds repriceable assets in given time periods.

While a positive gap indicates the degree to which the volume of repriceable assets exceeds repriceable liabilities in given time periods.

At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company had a positive GAPnegative gap position of approximately $515.5$1.1 billion or 10.55% of total assets, out to three months, and a negative cumulative gap position of $742 million, or 7%6.93% of total assets out to twelve months. At December 31, 2021, the Company had a negative gap position of approximately $267 million or 2.25% of total assets out to three months and a positive cumulative GAPgap position of $117.0$102 million or 2%0.86% of totaltotal assets out to 12 months; as compared to a positive GAP position of approximately $1.14 billion or 17% of total assets out to three months and a positive cumulative GAP position of $1.13 billion or 16% of total assets out to 12 months at December 31, 2016.months. The change in the positive GAPgap position at September 30, 20172022 as compared to December 31, 2016,2021 was due substantiallyto reduction in cash relative to securities holdings. Such a new methodology which took effect September 30, 2017. Under the new methodology, rate sensitive liabilities have been remodeled to reflect a more conservative repricing model. This resulted in significant changes to the GAP analysis due to interest bearing transaction and savings and money market deposits being assumed to reprice entirely in the 0-3 month category. Changes in the GAP position between September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were also due to the higher amount of asset liquidity on the balance sheet including an increase in interest bearing balances. There was also a decrease in the mix of variable rate loans from 67% of total loans to 66%. The change in the GAPgap position at September 30, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016 is not deemed material to the Company’sCompany's overall interest rate risk position, which relies more heavily on simulation analysis that captures the full optionalityopportunity within the balance sheet. The current position is within guideline limits established by the ALCO. While management believes that this overall position creates a reasonable balance in managing its interest rate risk and maximizing its net interest margin within plan objectives, there can be no assurance as to the actual results.

Management has carefully considered its strategy to maximize interest income by reviewing interest rate levels, economic indicators and call features within its investment portfolio, as well as interest rate floors within its loan portfolio. These factors have been discussed with the ALCO and management believes that current strategies areremain appropriate to current economic and interest rate trends.

If interest rates increase by 100 basis points, the Company’sCompany's net interest income and net interest margin are expected to increase modestly due to the impact of significant volumes of variable rate assets repricing ahead of liabilities andmore than offsetting the assumption of an increase in money market interest rates by 70% of the change in market interest rates.

If interest rates decline by 100 basis points, the Company’sCompany's net interest income and margin are expected to decline modestly as the impact of lower market rates on a large amount of liquid assets more than offsets the ability to lower interest rates on interest bearing liabilities.

Because competitive market behavior does not necessarily track the trend of interest rates but at times moves ahead of financial market influences, the change in the cost of liabilities may be different than anticipated by the GAPgap model. If this were to occur, the effects of a declining interest rate environment may not be in accordance with management’smanagement's expectations.


62
GAP Analysis                        
September 30, 2017                        
(dollars in thousands)                        
                 Total Rate       
Repricible in: 0-3 months  4-12 months  13-36 months  37-60 months  Over 60 months  Sensitive  Non Sensitive  Total 
RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS:                                
Investment securities $24,085  $63,870  $150,900  $115,917  $232,233  $587,006         
Loans (1)(2)  3,669,502   669,010   849,157   625,567   296,949   6,110,184         
Fed funds and other short-term investments  440,704               440,704         
Other earning assets  61,238               61,238         
Total $4,195,529  $732,880  $1,000,057  $741,484  $529,182  $7,199,132  $194,524  $7,393,656 
                         ��       
RATE SENSITIVE LIABILITIES:                                
Noninterest bearing demand $219,573  $513,867  $707,452  $256,447  $145,818  $1,843,157         
Interest bearing transaction  429,247               429,247         
Savings and money market  2,818,871               2,818,871         
Time deposits  188,788   367,444   242,910   23,535      822,677         
Customer repurchase agreements and fed funds purchased  73,569               73,569         
Other borrowings  200,000         147,663   69,144   416,807         
Total $3,930,048  $881,311  $950,362  $427,645  $214,962  $6,404,328  $55,345  $6,459,674 
GAP $265,481  $(148,431) $49,695  $313,839  $314,220  $794,804         
Cumulative GAP $265,481  $117,050  $166,745  $480,584  $794,804             
                                 
Cumulative gap as percent of total assets  3.59%  1.58%  2.26%  6.50%  10.75%            
                                 
OFF BALANCE-SHEET:                                
Interest Rate Swaps - LIBOR based $150,000  $  $(75,000) $(75,000) $  $         
Interest Rate Swaps - Fed Funds based  100,000         (100,000)              
Total $250,000  $  $(75,000) $(175,000) $  $  $  $ 
GAP $515,481  $(148,431) $(25,305) $138,839  $314,220  $794,804         
Cumulative GAP $515,481  $367,050  $341,745  $480,584  $794,804  $         
Cumulative gap as percent of total assets  6.97%  4.96%  4.62%  6.50%  10.75%            



Gap Analysis
September 30, 2022
(dollars in thousands) 
Repriceable in: 0-3
months
4-12
months
13-36
months
37-60
months
Over 60
months
Total
Rate
Sensitive
Non SensitiveTotal
RATE SENSITIVE ASSETS:                
Investment securities$224,038 $307,157 $715,867 $527,796 $988,980 $2,763,838 
Loans (1)(2)
3,978,093 665,154 1,245,209 778,417 571,244 7,238,117 
Fed funds and other short-term investments116,940 — — — — 116,940 
Other earning assets110,678 — — — — 110,678 
Total$4,429,749 $972,311 $1,961,076 $1,306,213 $1,560,224 $10,229,573 $483,471 $10,713,044 
RATE SENSITIVE LIABILITIES:
Noninterest bearing demand$104,409 $290,556 $631,418 $466,623 $1,435,767 $2,928,773 
Interest bearing transaction964,567 — — — — 964,567 
Savings and money market3,805,768 — — — 415,000 4,220,768 
Time deposits148,917 294,219 184,358 18,617 3,130 649,241 
Customer repurchase agreements and fed funds purchased21,465 — — — — 21,465 
Other borrowings515,000 — 69,763 — — 584,763 
Total$5,560,126 $584,775 $885,539 $485,240 $1,853,897 $9,369,577 $123,696 $9,493,273 
Gap$(1,130,377)$387,536 $1,075,537 $820,973 $(293,673)$859,996 
Cumulative Gap$(1,130,377)$(742,841)$332,696 $1,153,669 $859,996 
Cumulative gap as percent of total assets(10.55)%(6.93)%3.11 %10.77 %8.03 %

(1)Net of allowance for credit losses; Includes loans held for sale.

(2)Nonaccrual loans are included in the over 60 months category.

Capital Resources and Adequacy

The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality and mix, liquidity, earnings performance, changing competitive conditions and economic forces, stress testing, regulatory measures and policy, as well as the overall level of growth and complexity of the balance sheet. The adequacy of the Company’sCompany's current and future capital needs is monitored by management on an ongoing basis. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and to absorb potential losses.

The federal banking regulators have issued guidance for those institutions which are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Pursuant to the supervisory criteria contained in the guidance for identifying institutions with a potential commercial real estate concentration risk, institutions which have (1) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land acquisitions which represent 100% or more of an institution’sinstitution's total risk-based capital; or (2) total commercial real estate loans representing 300% or more of the institution’sinstitution's total risk-based capital and the institution’sinstitution's commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months are identified as having potential commercial real estate concentration risk. Institutions which are deemed to have concentrations in commercial real estate lending are expected to employ heightened levels of risk management with respect to their commercial real estate portfolios, and may be required to hold higher levels of capital. The Company, like many community banks, has a concentration infocused on commercial real estate loans, and the Company has experienced significant growth in its commercial real estate portfolio in recent years. At September 30, 2017 non-owner-occupied2022, we did exceed the construction, land development, and other land acquisitions regulatory concentration threshold, we continue to monitor our concentration in commercial real estate loans (including construction, landlending and land development loans) represent 334% of total risk based capital.remain in compliance with the guidance issued by the federal banking regulators. Construction, land and land development loans represent 131%109% of total risk based capital. Management has extensive experience in commercial real estate lending, and has implemented and continues to maintain heightened risk management procedures, and strong underwriting criteriacriteria with respect to its commercial real estate portfolio. Loan monitoring practices include but are not limited to periodic stress testing analysis to evaluate changes to cash flows, owing to interest rate increases and declines in net operating income. Nevertheless, as our commercial real estate concentration fluctuates each quarter, we may be required to maintain higher levels of capital, as a result of our commercial real estate concentrations, which could require us to obtain additional capital, and may adversely affect shareholder returns. The Company has an extensive Capital Plan and Capital Policy, which includes pro-forma projections including stress testing within which the Board of Directors has established internal policy limitsminimum targets for regulatory capital ratios that are in excess of well capitalized ratios.


63



The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors and the regulators can lower classifications in certain cases. Failure to meet various capital requirements can initiate regulatory action that could have a direct material effect on the financial statements.

The prompt corrective action regulations provide five categories, including well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If a bank is only adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to, among other things, accept, renew or roll-over brokered deposits. If a bank is undercapitalized, capital distributions and growth and expansion are limited, and plans for capital restoration are required.

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board

The FRB and the FDIC approved finalhave adopted rules (the "Basel III Rules") implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’sSupervision's capital guidelines for U.S. banks (commonly known as Basel III). Under the final rules, which became applicable toBasel III Rules, the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015 and are subjectrequired to a phase-in period through January 1, 2019, minimum requirements will increase for bothmaintain, inclusive of the quantity and quality of capital held by the Company and the Bank. The rules include a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CET1 ratio) of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, which when fully phased-in, effectively results in, a minimum CET1 ratio of 7.0%. Basel III raises the, a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% (which, with the capital conservation buffer, effectively results in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% when fully phased-in), effectively results in a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.5% (with the capital conservation buffer fully phased-in), and requires a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Basel III also makes changes to risk weights for certain assets and off-balance-sheet exposures.

On July 26, 2016,At September 30, 2022, the Company completedand the saleBank meet all these requirements, and satisfy the requirement to maintain a capital conservation buffer of $150.0 million2.5% of its 5.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes, due August 1, 2026 (the “Notes”). The Notes were offered to the public at par. The notes qualify as Tier 2CET1 capital for regulatory purposescapital adequacy purposes.

The Company announced a regular quarterly cash dividend on September 20, 2022 of $0.45 per share to the fullest extent permitted under the Basel III Rule.

shareholders of record on October 10, 2022 and was paid on October 31, 2022.

The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and Bank as of September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2016 and September 30, 20162021 are presented in the table below.

           To Be Well 
  Company  Bank  Minimum  Capitalized Under 
              Required For  Prompt Corrective 
  Actual  Actual  Capital  Action 
(dollars in thousands) Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Adequacy Purposes  Regulations * 
As of September 30, 2017                  
CET1 capital (to risk weighted aseets) $827,220   11.40% $949,487   13.12%  5.750%  6.5%
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)  1,110,282   15.30%  1,012,072   13.98%  9.250%  10.0%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)  827,220   11.40%  949,487   13.12%  7.250%  8.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)  827,220   11.78%  949,487   13.54%  5.000%  5.0%
                         
As of December 31, 2016                        
CET1 capital (to risk weighted aseets) $737,512   10.80% $854,226   12.55%  5.125%  6.5%
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)  1,016,712   14.89%  913,100   13.41%  8.625%  10.0%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)  737,512   10.80%  854,226   12.55%  6.625%  8.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)  737,512   10.72%  854,226   12.44%  5.000%  5.0%
                         
As of September 30, 2016                        
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets) $710,104   10.83% $825,879   12.63%  5.125%  6.5%
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)  987,068   15.05%  882,602   13.50%  8.625%  10.0%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)  710,104   10.83%  825,879   12.63%  6.625%  8.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)  710,104   11.12%  825,879   12.95%  5.000%  5.0%

CompanyBankMinimum
Required For
Capital
To Be Well
Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective
ActualActualAdequacyAction
(dollars in thousands)AmountRatioAmountRatioPurposesRegulations*
As of September 30, 2022
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets)$1,332,545 15.11 %$1,340,156 15.30 %7.00 %6.50 %
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)1,419,63916.10 %1,412,91216.13 %10.50 %10.00 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)1,332,54515.11 %1,340,156 15.30 %8.50 %8.00 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)1,332,54511.55 %1,340,15611.67 %4.00 %5.00 %
As of December 31, 2021
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets)$1,269,329 15.02 %$1,261,518 15.01 %7.00 %6.50 %
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)1,365,117 16.15 %1,329,306 15.82 %10.50 %10.00 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)1,269,329 15.02 %1,261,518 15.01 %8.50 %8.00 %
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)1,269,329 10.19 %1,261,518 10.16 %4.00 %5.00 %
* Applies to Bank only.

only

Bank and holding company regulations, as well as Maryland law, impose certain restrictions on dividend payments by the Bank, as well as restricting extensions of credit and transfers of assets between the Bank and the Company. At September 30, 20172022 the Bank could pay dividends to the parentCompany to the extent of its earnings so long as it maintained the minimum required capital ratios.

ratios listed in the table above.

In December 2018, federal banking regulators issued a final rule that provides an optional three-year phase-in period for the adverse regulatory capital effects of adopting the CECL methodology pursuant to new accounting guidance for the recognition of credit losses on certain financial instruments, effective January 1, 2020. In March 2020, the federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that provides banking organizations with an alternative option to temporarily delay for two years the estimated impact of the adoption of the CECL methodology on regulatory capital, followed by the three-year phase-in period. The cumulative amount that is not recognized in regulatory capital will be phased in at 25 percent per year beginning January 1, 2022. We have elected to adopt the March 2020 interim final rule.
64


Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The Company considers the following non-GAAP measurements useful for investors, regulators, management and others to evaluate capital adequacy and to compare against other financial institutions. The tables below provide a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures with financial measures defined by GAAP.

Tangible common equity to tangible assets (the “tangible"tangible common equity ratio”ratio") and, tangible book value per common share, tangible book value per common share excluding accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCI"), the annualized return on average tangible common equity, and efficiency ratio are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. The Company calculates the tangible common equity ratio by excluding the balance of intangible assets from common shareholders’shareholders' equity and dividing by tangible assets. The Company calculates tangible book value per common share by dividing tangible common equity by common shares outstanding, as compared to book value per common share, which the Company calculates by dividing common shareholders’shareholders' equity by common shares outstanding. To calculate the tangible book value per common share excluding the AOCI, tangible common equity is reduced by the loss on the AOCI before dividing by common shares outstanding. The Company calculates the ROATCE by dividing net income available to common shareholders by average tangible common equity which is calculated by excluding the average balance of intangible assets from the average common shareholders' equity. The Company calculates the efficiency ratio by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. The efficiency ratio measures a bank's overhead as a percentage of its revenue. The Company considers this information important to shareholders as tangible equity is a measure that is consistent with the calculation of capital for bank regulatory purposes, which excludes intangible assets from the calculation of risk based ratios.

ratios and as such is useful for investors, regulators, management and others to evaluate capital adequacy and to compare against other financial institutions.

GAAP Reconciliation

Non-GAAP Reconciliation (Unaudited)       
       
(dollars in thousands except per share data)        (dollars in thousands except per share data)September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
        
 Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended Three Months Ended 
 September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016  September 30, 2016 
Common shareholders’ equity $933,982  $842,799  $815,639 
Common shareholders' equityCommon shareholders' equity$1,219,771 $1,350,775 
Less: Intangible assets  (107,150)  (107,419)  (107,694)Less: Intangible assets(104,240)(105,793)
Tangible common equity $826,832  $735,380  $707,945 Tangible common equity$1,115,531 $1,244,982 
            
Book value per common share $27.33  $24.77  $24.28 Book value per common share$38.02 $42.28 
Less: Intangible book value per common share  (3.14)  (3.16)  (3.20)Less: Intangible book value per common share(3.25)(3.31)
Tangible book value per common share $24.19  $21.61  $21.08 Tangible book value per common share$34.77 $38.97 
            
Book value per common shareBook value per common share$38.02 $42.28 
Add: AOCI book value per common shareAdd: AOCI book value per common share6.57 0.45 
Adjusted book value excluding AOCI per common shareAdjusted book value excluding AOCI per common share$44.59 $42.73 
Tangible book value per common shareTangible book value per common share$34.77 $38.97 
Add: AOCI book value per common shareAdd: AOCI book value per common share6.57 0.45 
Adjusted tangible book value excluding AOCI per common shareAdjusted tangible book value excluding AOCI per common share$41.34 $39.42 
Total assets $7,393,656  $6,890,096  $6,762,132 Total assets$10,713,044 $11,847,310 
Less: Intangible assets  (107,150)  (107,419)  (107,694)Less: Intangible assets(104,240)(105,793)
Tangible assets $7,286,506  $6,782,677  $6,654,438 Tangible assets$10,608,804 $11,741,517 
Tangible common equity ratio  11.35%  10.84%  10.64%Tangible common equity ratio10.52 %10.60 %

65


Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)2022202120222021
Average common shareholders' equity$1,271,753 $1,331,022 $1,298,170 $1,292,223 
Less: Average intangible assets(104,253)(105,126)(104,252)(105,151)
Average tangible common equity$1,167,500 $1,225,896 $1,193,918 $1,187,072 
Net income available to common shareholders$37,297 $43,609 $98,737 $135,071 
Average tangible common equity1,167,500 1,225,896 1,193,918 1,187,072 
Annualized return on average tangible common equity12.67 %14.11 %11.06 %15.21 %

Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)2022202120222021
Net interest income$83,897$79,045$247,267$246,328
Noninterest income5,3088,29918,32529,811
Revenue$89,205$87,344$265,592$276,139
Noninterest expense$36,206$36,375$126,180$109,856
Efficiency ratio40.59 %41.65 %47.51 %39.78 %
Total loans, excluding loans held for sale and PPP loans is a non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP-based amounts. The Company calculates total loans, excluding loans held for sale and PPP loans by excluding the balance of the PPP loans from the total loans. The Company considers this information important to shareholders as total loans, excluding loans held for sale and PPP loans is a measure that removes fluctuations associated with the activity related to the non-core business and management of the PPP portfolio.

(dollars in thousands)September 30, 2022December 31, 2021
Total loans, excluding loans held for sale (GAAP)$7,304,498 $7,065,598 
Less: PPP loans(7,241)(51,105)
Total loans, excluding loans held for sale and PPP loans (Non-GAAP)$7,297,257 $7,014,493 

Adjusted Salaries and Employee Benefits is a non-GAAP financial measure derived from GAAP based amounts. The Company calculates Adjusted Salaries and Employee Benefits by subtracting from total salaries and employee benefits the one-time accrual reduction of $5.0 million related to share-based compensation awards and deferred compensation for the Company's former CEO and Chairman in the first quarter of 2022. The Company considers this information important to shareholders because the accrual reduction was a one-time event that occurred during the first quarter of 2022. The Adjusted Salaries and Employee Benefits non-GAAP measure provides investors insight into how salaries and employee benefits changed during the first quarter of 2022 exclusive of the one-time accrual reduction, and allows investors to better compare the Company's performance against historical periods.

Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)2022202120222021
Salaries and employee benefits$21,538$22,145$60,362$63,790
Accrual reduction for former CEO and Chairman5,018
Adjusted salaries and employee benefits (non-GAAP)$21,538$22,145$65,380$63,790

66


Adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share (diluted) are non-GAAP financial measures derived from GAAP based amounts. The Company calculates adjusted net income by excluding from net income the $13.4 million accrual of non-tax deductible expenses during the quarter to cover the Company's civil money penalty and disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest, in connection with the Company's agreement in principle with the SEC and $9.5 million accrual in connection with expected penalties from the FRB to resolve the previously disclosed investigation with respect to the Company. The Company calculates adjusted earnings per share (diluted) by dividing the total $22.9 million accrual by the weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2022. The Company considers this information important to shareholders because adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share (diluted) provides investors insight into how Company earnings changed exclusive of the costs related to the agreement in principle with the SEC, and allow investors to better compare the Company's performance against historical periods. The table below provides a reconciliation of adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share (diluted) to the nearest GAAP measure.

Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)2022202120222021
Net Income$37,297$43,609$98,737 $135,071 
Reversal of penalties, disgorgement & prejudgment interest22,874
Adjusted net income (non-GAAP)$37,297$43,609$121,611$135,071
Earnings per share (diluted)$1.16$1.36$3.07 $4.22 
Reversal of penalties, disgorgement & prejudgment interest per share (diluted)0.71
Adjusted earnings per share (diluted) (non-GAAP)$1.16$1.36$3.78$4.22

The decline in adjusted net income over the comparative three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to decreases in gains on sales of loan and other income in connection with the reduced activity in the residential lending business, decreases in gains on the sales of investments and an increase in the provision for expected credit losses during the three months ended September 30, 2022 as compared to a reversal of expected credit losses during the three months ended September 30, 2021.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Please refer to Item 2 of this report, “Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," under the caption “Asset/"Asset/Liability Management and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.

"

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based onThe Company's management, under the evaluationsupervision and with the participation of ourthe Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of the last day of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, (asas defined in RulesRule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) required by Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) underAct. Based on that evaluation, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman and ourthe Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company did not maintain effectiveCompany's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2017 as a result of the material weakness2022 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s internal control relatingreports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and that it is accumulated and communicated to income tax accounting, discussed below.

our management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal controlscontrol over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) that occurred during the third quarter of 20172022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, other than as described below under the caption “Remediation Plan.”

Management assessed the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017. This assessment was conducted based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission “Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013).” Based on this assessment, management believes that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017 as a result of a material weakness in the Company’s internal control relating to income tax accounting, as discussed below.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company did not maintain effective controls over its income tax accounting. Specifically, the Company did not maintain effective controls related to: state income tax apportionment; an error in federal tax rates; financial statement to tax return reconciliation errors; and matters related to accounting for share based compensation. While these errors were determined not to be material to the consolidated financial statements, and no adjustments were made as a result of these errors, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement of the tax accruals or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

reporting.

67

Remediation Plan. As previously described in Part II, Item 9A of our 2016 Form 10-K, we began implementing a remediation plan to address the control deficiency that led to the material weakness mentioned above. The remediation plan includes the following:

Implementing specific review procedures, including the enhanced involvement of outside independent tax consulting services in the review of tax accounting, designed to enhance our income tax accruals and deferrals; and

Stronger quarterly income tax controls with improved documentation standards, technical oversight and training.

Our enhanced review procedures and documentation standards were in place and operating during the third quarter of 2017. We are in the process of testing the newly implemented internal controls and related procedures. The material weakness cannot be considered remediated until the control has operated for a sufficient period of time and until management has concluded, through testing, that the control is operating effectively. Our goal is to remediate this material weakness for the year ending December 31, 2017.



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

From time to time the Company may become involved in

For a description of our material pending legal proceedings. At the present time there are no proceedings, which the Company believes will have a material adverse impact on the financial condition or earningssee "Note 11. Legal Contingencies" of the Company.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A - Risk Factors

There have been no material changes as of September 30, 2017

We are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described in the risk factors from those disclosedPart I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

2021, which could adversely affect our business, financial performance and results of operations. There have been no material changes to our risk factors from those risks included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)
(a) Sales of Unregistered Securities.
None
(b)
Use of Proceeds.Not Applicable
(c) Issuer [Purchases of Securities].
(c)Issuer Purchases of Securities.None
Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesNone
Item 4 – Mine Safety DisclosuresNot Applicable
Item 5 – Other Information
(a)Required 8-K DisclosuresNone
(b)Changes in Procedures for Director NominationsNone
On December 28, 2021, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2022 Repurchase Program") to take effect starting January 1, 2022, after the expiration of the previous repurchase program on December 31, 2021. The Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 1,600,000 shares of common stock, or approximately 5% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock, under 2022 Repurchase Program, which will expire on December 31, 2022, subject to earlier termination of the program by the Board of Directors. No shares were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2022 under the 2022 Repurchase Plan.
Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable
Item 5 - Other Information
None.
68



Item 6 - Exhibits

3.1Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (1)
BylawsCertification of the Company (2)
4.1Subordinated Indenture, dated as of August 5, 2014, between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee  (3)
4.2First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 5, 2014, between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (4)


4.3Form of Global Note representing the 5.75% Subordinated Notes due September 1, 2024 (included in Exhibit 4.2)
4.4Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 26, 2016, between the Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (5)
4.5Form of Global Note representing the 5.00% Fix-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due August 1, 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.4)
10.12016 Stock Option Plan (6)
10.22006 Stock Plan (7)
10.3Employment Agreement dated as of April 7, 2017, between EagleBank and Charles D. Levingston (8)
10.4Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2017, between EagleBank and Antonio F. Marquez  (9)
10.5Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2017, between Eagle Bancorp, Inc., EagleBank and Ronald D. Paul (10)
10.6Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2017, between EagleBank and Susan G. Riel (11)
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated asCertification of January 31, 2017, between EagleBank and Janice L. Williams (12)Norman R. Pozez
Non-Compete Agreement dated as of April 7, 2017, between EagleBank and Charles D. Levingston (13)
10.9Non-Compete Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, between EagleBank and Antonio F. Marquez (14)
10.10Non-Compete Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, between EagleBank and Ronald D. Paul (15)
10.11Non-Compete Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, between EagleBank and Susan G. Riel (16)
10.12Non-Compete Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, between EagleBank and Janice L. Williams (17)
10.13Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2017, between EagleBank and Laurence E. Bensignor (18)
10.14Non-Compete Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, between EagleBank and Laurence E. Bensignor (19)
10.15Form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement (20)
10.16Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 2017 between EagleBank and Lindsey S. Rheaume (21)
10.17Non-Compete Agreement dated as of December 15, 2014, between EagleBank and Lindsey S. Rheaume (22)
10.18Virginia Heritage Bank 2006 Stock Option Plan (23)
10.19Virginia Heritage Bank 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (24)
10.20Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (25)
10.21Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (26)
11Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Income
See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
21Subsidiaries of the Registrant
31.1Certification of Ronald D. Paul
31.2Certification of Charles D. Levingston
Certification of Ronald D. PaulSusan G. Riel
Certification of Norman R. Pozez
Certification of Charles D. Levingston

101Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T:
(i)Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2017,2022 and December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016.2021
(ii)Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
(iii)Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.2021


(iii)  Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021
(iv)Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.2021
(v)Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016.2021
(vi)(vi)  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements

104(1)Incorporated by reference to the ExhibitThe cover page of the same number to the Company’s Currentthis Quarterly Report on Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2016.10-Q, formatted in Inline XBRL

(2)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2016.

(3)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2014.

(4)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2014.

(5)Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2016.

(6)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-211857) filed on June 6, 2016.

(7)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-187713).

(8)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2017.

(9)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017.

(10)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017.

(11)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017.

(12)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017.

(13)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2017.

(14)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2014.

(15)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2014.

(16)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2014.

(17)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2014.

(18)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017.

(19)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2014.

(20)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2013.

(21)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2017.

(22)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2015.

(23)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-199875).

(24)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-199875).

(25)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333- 153426).

(26)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333- 153426).


69


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EAGLE BANCORP, INC.
Date: November 9, 20178, 2022By:/s/ Ronald D. PaulSusan G. Riel
Ronald D. Paul, Chairman,Susan G. Riel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Date: November 9, 20178, 2022By:/s/ Charles D. Levingston
Charles D. Levingston, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company


70