UNITED STATES

~~UNITED STATES~~

SECURITIES~~SECURITIES~~ANDEXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington,~~Washington,~~D.C. 20549

☒	QUARTERLYREPORTPURSUANTTOSECTION13OR15(d)OFTHESECURITIESEXCHANGEACTOF1934

☒For~~QUARTERLY~~~~REPORT~~~~PURSUANT~~TO~~SECTION~~13OR~~15(d)~~OF~~THE~~~~SECURITIES~~~~EXCHANGE~~~~ACT~~OF~~1934~~

~~For~~thequarterlyperiodended September 30 ~~2016~~, 2017

☐	TRANSITIONREPORTPURSUANTTOSECTION13OR15(d)OFTHESECURITIESEXCHANGEACTOF1934

☐ For~~TRANSITION~~~~REPORT~~~~PURSUANT~~TO~~SECTION~~13OR~~15(d)~~OF~~THE~~~~SECURITIES~~~~EXCHANGE~~~~ACT~~OF~~1934~~

~~For~~thetransitionperiodfrom_____to_____.

Commission File Number: 000-14801

Mikros~~Mikros~~ Systems Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	14-1598200
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

707~~707~~AlexanderRoad,BuildingTwo,Suite208, Princeton,NewJersey08540

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(609)~~(609)~~ 987-1513

(~~Registrant’s~~Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~☒Yes ☐No~~

☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ~~☒Yes ☐No~~☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	~~Accelerated filer~~ ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐

Yes ~~☒No~~ ☒ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: There were ~~35,618,044~~35,561,775 issued and outstanding shares of the issuer’s common stock, $.01 par value per share, on November 14, ~~2016.~~2017.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		~~PAGE #~~
~~PART~~I.	~~FINANCIAL~~~~INFORMATION~~
		PAGE #
~~Item 1.~~ PARTI.	~~Financial Statements~~ FINANCIALINFORMATION

Item 1.	~~Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (unaudited) 1~~ Financial Statements	1

	Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (unaudited)	1

	Condensed Statements of ~~Operations~~Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine ~~MonthsEnded~~Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ (unaudited)	2

	Condensed Statement of ~~Stockholders’~~Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2016(unaudited)~~ 2017 (unaudited)	3

	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015(unaudited)~~ (unaudited)	4

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	9

Item 4.	10 Controls and Procedures	13

PARTII.	OTHERINFORMATION

Item 4. 2	~~Controls~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and ~~Procedures~~ Use of Proceeds.	16

~~PART~~~~II.~~	~~OTHER~~~~INFORMATION~~	14

Item 6.	~~Exhibits~~ Exhibits	17 14

	~~Signatures~~ Signatures	18 15

Part I Financial Information

Item 1 Financial Statements

Mikros Systems Corporation

~~Condensed~~ Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,310,173		$	2,858,655		$	1,079,789		$	858,868
Receivables on government contracts		654,980			431,012			1,364,968			1,704,301
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		326,797			59,205			82,766			55,144
Total current assets		2,291,950			3,348,872			2,527,523			2,618,313
Property and equipment
Equipment		95,693			95,693			138,105			95,693
Leasehold improvements								21,306			-
Furniture & fixtures		16,394			16,394			37,557			16,394
Less: accumulated depreciation		(82,340	)		(70,257	)		(100,370	)		(86,436	)
Property and equipment, net		29,747			41,830			96,598			25,651
Intangible assets		128,916			127,383			133,899			128,916
Less: accumulated amortization		(27,659	)		(11,812	)		(48,812	)		(32,947	)
Intangible assets, net		101,257			115,571			85,087			95,969
Deferred tax assets		201,608			214,548			141,731			204,991
Total assets	$	2,624,562		$	3,720,821		$	2,850,939		$	2,944,924
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes	$	312,069		$	574,019		$	509,720		$	460,434
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		198,171			377,928			198,107			338,872
Accrued warranty expense		256,298			359,654			-			240,980
Deferred revenue		18,750			24,000			30,000			7,500
Total current liabilities		785,288			1,335,601			737,827			1,047,786
Long-term liabilities		140,606			117,436			138,681			140,377
Total liabilities		925,894			1,453,037			876,508			1,188,163



Redeemable series C preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 150,000 shares,issued and outstanding, 0 and 5,000 shares, respectively		-			80,450

Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, series B convertible, par value $.01 per share, authorized1,200,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 44,345 and 1,102,433 shares, respectively		443			11,024
Preferred stock, convertible, par value $.01 per share, authorized 2,000,000 shares,issued and outstanding, 0 and 255,000 shares, respectively		-			2,550
Preferred stock, series D, par value $.01 per share, 690,000 shares authorizedissued and outstanding, 46,092 and 690,000 shares respectively		461			6,900
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 60,000,000 shares,issued and outstanding 35,183,125 and 32,025,753 shares, respectively		351,831			320,258
Preferred stock, convertible, par value $.01 per share, authorized 5,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding								-			-
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 60,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 35,561,775 and 35,424,775 shares, respectively								355,619			354,249
Capital in excess of par value		9,993,632			11,631,732			10,082,657			10,061,894
Accumulated deficit		(8,647,699	)		(9,785,130	)		(8,463,845	)		(8,659,382	)
Total shareholders' equity		1,698,668			2,187,334			1,974,431			1,756,761
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	2,624,562		$	3,720,821		$	2,850,939		$	2,944,924

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

Mikros Systems Corporation

Condensed Statements of ~~Operations~~Income and Comprehensive Income ~~(unaudited)~~(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended,				Nine Months Ended,				Three Months Ended,					Nine Months Ended,
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,		September 30,			September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2017			2016		2017		2016

Contract Revenues	$	1,180,491	$	1,240,393	$	3,146,792	$	5,450,815	$	1,551,620		$	1,180,491	$	5,047,456	$	3,146,792

Cost of sales		446,810		529,303		1,120,664		2,868,377		636,128			446,810		1,909,246		1,120,664

Gross margin		733,681		711,090		2,026,128		2,582,438		915,492			733,681		3,138,210		2,026,128

Expenses:
Engineering		421,296		309,769		1,058,058		1,058,705		530,477			421,296		1,587,069		1,058,058
General and administrative		261,528		328,734		894,430		951,331		379,407			261,528		1,218,694		894,430

Total expenses		682,824		638,503		1,952,488		2,010,036		909,884			682,824		2,805,763		1,952,488

Income from operations		50,857		72,587		73,640		572,402		5,608			50,857		332,447		73,640

Other income:
Interest		1,005		149		3,710		336		701			1,005		2,154		3,710

Net income before income taxes		51,862		72,736		77,350		572,738		6,309			51,862		334,601		77,350

Income tax expense		31,136		36,000		46,791		274,500
Income tax expense (benefit)										(22,696	)		31,136		139,064		46,791

Net income		20,726		36,736		30,559		298,238		29,005			20,726		195,537		30,559

Discount upon exchange of Preferred Stock, net of related fees		3,275		-		1,106,872		-		-			3,275		-		1,106,872

Net income available to common shareholders	$	24,001	$	36,736	$	1,137,431	$	298,238	$	29,005		$	24,001	$	195,537	$	1,137,431

Income per common share - basic	$	-	$	-	$	0.04	$	0.01	$	-		$	-	$	0.01	$	0.04

Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		32,419,016		31,947,753		32,048,486		32,064,778		35,555,742			32,419,016		35,246,893		32,048,486

Income per common share - diluted	$	-	$	-	$	0.03	$	0.01	$	-		$	-	$	0.01	$	0.03

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		32,864,713		35,548,552		34,450,220		35,665,577		35,862,205			32,864,713		35,524,857		34,450,220

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

Mikros Systems Corporation

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity ~~(unaudited)~~

(Unaudited)

Preferred Stock Series B
$0.01 Par Value

Convertible Preferred Stock
$0.01 Par Value

Preferred Stock Series D
$0.01 Par Value

Common Stock
$0.01 Par Value

Capital in Excess

Accumulated

Number of shares

Par Value

Number of shares

Par Value

Number of shares

Par Value

Number of shares

Par Value

of Par Value

Deficit

Total

Balance at December 31, 2015
1,102,433 $ 11,024 255,000 $ 2,550 690,000 $ 6,900 32,025,753 $ 320,258 $ 11,631,732 $ (9,785,130 ) $ 2,187,334

Extinguishment of Preferred Stock in exchange for cash and Common Stock
(1,058,088 ) (10,581 ) (255,000 ) (2,550 ) (643,908 ) (6,439 ) 4,827,539 48,275 (1,509,565 ) 1,106,872 (373,988 )
Purchase of Common Stock
(2,084,167 ) (20,842 ) (126,609 ) (147,451 )
Common shares issued to employees and directors
407,000 4,070 (4,070 ) -
Stock compensation
- - - - - - - - 1,864 - 1,864
Exercise of non-restricted stock awards
- - - - - - 7,000 70 280 - 350
Net income
- - - - - - - - - 30,559 30,559

Balance at September 30, 2016
44,345 $ 443 - $ - 46,092 $ 461 35,183,125 $ 351,831 $ 9,993,632 $ (8,647,699 ) $ 1,698,668

Preferred Stock
$0.01 Par Value

Common Stock
$0.01 Par Value

Capital

Number of shares

Par Value

Number of shares

Par Value

in Excess
of Par Value

Accumulated
Deficit

Total

Balance at January 1, 2017
- $ - 35,424,775 $ 354,249 $ 10,061,894 $ (8,659,382 ) $ 1,756,761
Stock compensation
- - - - 9,783 - 9,783
Exercise of non-restricted stock awards
- - 67,000 670 11,680 - 12,350
Restricted common shares issued
- - 70,000 700 (700 ) -
Net income
- - - - - 195,537 195,537

Balance at September 30, 2017
- $ - 35,561,775 $ 355,619 $ 10,082,657 $ (8,463,845 ) $ 1,974,431

~~Mikros Systems Corporation~~
~~Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)~~

None months ended

September 30,

September 30,

2016

2015

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income
$ 30,559 $ 298,238
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization
27,930 10,482
Deferred tax expense
12,940 62,000
Share-based compensation expense
1,864 2,043
Changes in assets and liabilities:

(Increase) decrease in receivables on government contracts
(223,968 ) 553,847
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
(267,592 ) 9,590
Decrease in accrued payroll and payroll taxes
(261,950 ) (60,138 )
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(200,115 ) (527,290 )
(Decrease) increase in accrued warranty expense
(103,356 ) 105,910
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue
(5,250 ) 36,000
Increase (Decrease) in long-term liabilities
23,170 (4,718 )
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(965,768 ) 485,964
Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments related to intangible assets
(1,533 ) -
Purchase of property and equipment
- (2,693 )
Net cash used in investing activities:
(1,533 ) (2,693 )
Cash flows from financing activities:

Payments to preferred shareholders in conjunction with a recapitalization
(375,795 ) -
Payments to acquire and retire Common Stock
(147,451 ) -
Professional fees paid in conjunction with recapitalization
(58,285 ) -
Exercise of stock options
350 350
Net cash used in financing activities:
(581,181 ) 350
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(1,548,482 ) 483,621
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
2,858,655 1,161,634
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$ 1,310,173 $ 1,645,255
Supplement cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for income taxes
$ 69,500 $ 215,183

Noncash investing and financing activities:

Issuance of common stock in exchange for preferred stock
$ 525,830
Recognition of an extinguishment liability in exchange for preferred stock
$ 33,941
Estimated consideration to be paid in connection with purchase of intangible asset
$ 126,000
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

Mikros Systems Corporation
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30

2017

2016

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income
$ 195,537 $ 30,559
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in ) operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization
33,657 27,930
Deferred tax expense
63,260 12,940
Share-based compensation expense
9,783 1,864
Changes in assets and liabilities:

Decrease (increase) in receivables on government contracts
339,333 (223,968 )
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets
(27,622 ) (267,592 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and payroll taxes
49,286 (261,950 )
(Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
(140,765 ) (200,115 )
(Decrease) in accrued warranty expense
(240,980 ) (103,356 )
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
22,500 (5,250 )
(Decrease) increase in long-term liabilities
(1,696 ) 23,170
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
302,293 (965,768 )
Cash flows from investing activities:

Payments related to intangible assets
(4,983 ) (1,533 )
Purchase of property and equipment
(88,739 ) -
Net cash used in investing activities:
(93,722 ) (1,533 )
Cash flows from financing activities:

Exercise of stock options
12,350 350
Payments to preferred shareholders in conjunction with a recapitalization
- (375,795 )
Payments to acquire and retire Common Stock
- (147,451 )
Professional fees paid in conjunction with recapitalization
- (58,285 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities:
12,350 (581,181 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
220,921 (1,548,482 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
858,868 2,858,655
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$ 1,079,789 $ 1,310,173
Supplement cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for income taxes
$ 70,150 $ 69,500

Noncash investing and financing activities:

Issuance of common stock in in exchange for preferred stock
$ 525,830
Recognition of an extinguishment liability in exchange for preferred stock
$ 33,941
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

Mikros~~Mikros~~ Systems Corporation
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(unaudited)

Note1–BasisofPresentation

The financial statements included herein have been prepared by Mikros Systems Corporation (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting solely of those which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its financial position as of September 30, ~~2016, and~~ 2017, the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015 and~~2016, changes in stockholders’ equity from January 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017 and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015.~~2016.

Note2–RecentAccountingPronouncements

~~There have~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) for revenue recognition for contracts, superseding the previous revenue recognition requirements, along with most existing industry-specific guidance. The guidance requires an entity to review contracts in five steps: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price, and 5) recognize revenue. The new standard will result in enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued guidance approving a one-year deferral, making the standard effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted only for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations for reporting revenue gross rather than net, with the same deferred effective date. In April 2016, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the identification of performance obligations and licensing arrangements. In May 2016, the FASB issued guidance addressing the presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers, providing clarification of the collectability criterion assessment, as well as clarifying certain transition requirements.
The Company has been ~~no developments~~analyzing the new standard and the related ASU's across all revenue streams to ~~recently issued~~evaluate the impact of the new standard on revenue contracts. This includes reviewing current accounting ~~standards, including~~policies and practices to identify potential differences that would result from applying the ~~expected dates~~requirements under the new standard. The Company is completing contract evaluations and validating the results of ~~adoption~~applying the new revenue guidance and ~~estimated effects on the Company’s condensed financial statements, from those disclosed~~is in the ~~Company’s 2015 Annual Report~~process of finalizing its accounting policies, drafting the new disclosures, quantifying the potential financial adjustment and completing its evaluation of the impact of the accounting and disclosure requirements on ~~Form 10-K.~~business processes, controls and systems. Full implementation will be completed by the end of 2017. The Company expects to adopt the new standard using the modified retrospective approach, under which the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance is recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the first quarter of 2018.

Note3–SignificantAccountingPolicies

RevenueRecognition
The Company is engaged in research and development contracts with the federal government to develop certain technology to be utilized by the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”). The contracts are cost plus fixed fee contracts and revenue is recognized on the basis of such measurement of partial performance as will reflect reasonably assured realization or delivery of completed articles. Fees earned under the ~~Company’s~~Company’s contracts may also be accrued as they are billable, under the terms of the agreements, unless such accrual is not reasonably related to the proportionate performance of the total work or services to be performed by the Company from inception to completion. Under the terms of certain contracts, fixed fees are not recognized until the receipt of full payment has become unconditional, that is, when the product has been delivered and accepted by the federal government. Backlog represents the estimated amount of future revenues to be recognized under negotiated contracts as work is performed. The Company’s backlog includes future Adaptive Diagnostic Electronic Portable Testset(“ADEPT”) units to be developed and delivered to the federal government.

Mikros Systems Corporation
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(unaudited)

The Company recognizes revenue as it relates to the license of software when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. The sale and/or license of software products and technology is deemed to have occurred when a customer either has taken possession of or has access to take immediate possession of the software or technology. Software license agreements include post-contract customer support ("PCS"). For the ~~Company’s~~Company’s software and software-related multiple element arrangements, where customers purchase both software related products and software related services, the Company uses vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value for software and software-related services to separate the elements and account for them separately. VSOE exists when a company can support what the fair value of its software and/or software-related services is based on evidence of the prices charged when the same elements are sold separately. VSOE of fair value is required, generally, in order to separate the accounting for various elements in a software and related services arrangement. The Company has established VSOE of fair value for the majority of the PCS, professional services, and training. Given the limited number of sales related to this software, and the fact that the Company does not sell the PCS element separately, there is no VSOE currently available to bifurcate the PCS element from the contract. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic ~~985-605-25-10a,~~985-605-25-10a, the fees earned from sale of licenses to which the only undelivered element is the PCS, are recognized ratably over the life of the contract. Revenues from the sale of software licenses and maintenance for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015~~2016 were ~~$10,695~~$10,000 and ~~$12,000~~$10,695 and ~~$72,196~~$22,500 and ~~$12,000,~~$72,196, respectively. At September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~ 2016, deferred revenues amounted to ~~$18,750~~$30,000 and ~~$24,000,~~$7,500, respectively.

~~Mikros Systems Corporation~~
~~Notes to Condensed Financial Statements~~
~~(unaudited)~~

Unbilled revenue reflects work performed, but not billed at the time, per contractual requirements. As of September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~ 2016, the Company had unbilled revenues of ~~$118,156~~$226,130 and ~~$60,857,~~$235,421, respectively which are recorded within receivables on government contracts in the Company’s balance sheet. Billings to customers in excess of revenue earned are classified as advanced billings, and shown as a liability. As of September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~ 2016, there were ~~$0 and $125,157, respectively, of~~no advanced billings.

WarrantyExpense
The Company provides a limited warranty, as defined by the related warranty agreements, for its production units. The Company’s warranties require the Company to repair or replace defective products during such warranty period. The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its warranty and records a liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units sold, expected and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amount as necessary. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company recognized a warranty ~~(benefit) expense~~benefit of ~~$(65,500)~~$0 and ~~$106,800,~~$65,500, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company recognized a warranty ~~expense (benefit)~~benefit of ~~$(86,301)~~$238,967 and ~~$113,400,~~$86,301, respectively. ~~Since the inception of the ADEPT Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (“IDIQ”) contract in March 2010, the Company has delivered 189 ADEPT units.~~ As of September 30, ~~2016, there are 52~~2017, no ADEPT units ~~that~~ remain under the limited warranty coverage.

The following table reflects the reserve for product warranty activity for:

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Balance, beginning of the period
$ 240,980 $ 359,654
Provision for product warranty
- 1,800
Product warranty expirations
(238,967 ) (86,301 )
Product warranty costs paid
(2,013 ) (34,173 )
Balance, end of the period
$ - $ 240,980

Mikros Systems Corporation
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(unaudited)

September 30,

December 31,

2016

2015

Beginning balance
$ 359,654 $ 33,500
Provision for product warranty
- 400,500
Product warranty expirations
(86,301 ) -
Product warranty costs paid
(17,055 ) (74,346 )
Ending balance
$ 256,298 $ 359,654
Research and Development Expense

Research and Development expenditures ~~for research and development~~ of the Company's products are expensed when incurred, and are included in general and administrative expenses. The Company recognized research and development costs as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Salaries
$ 68,158 $ 12,288 $ 159,237 $ 49,292
Other costs
12,193 1,600 39,645 9,852
$ 80,351 $ 13,888 $ 198,882 $ 59,144
Intangible Assets

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2016

2015

2016

2015

Salaries
$ 12,288 $ 24,890 $ 49,292 $ 34,625
Other costs
1,600 - 9,852 -
$ 13,888 $ 24,890 $ 59,144 $ 34,625

The~~Mikros Systems Corporation~~
~~Notes to Condensed Financial Statements~~
~~(unaudited)~~
~~Intangible Assets~~
~~The~~ majority of the Company’s intangible assets isconsists of a license acquired during 2015. In July 2015, the Company purchased certain software products, intellectual property and related assets from VSE Corporation. The primary software programs purchased were the Prognostics Framework (PF) and Diagnostic Profiler (DP) programs. The Diagnostic Profiler software is used worldwide by several multinational companies for optimized maintenance of diverse product lines. The Diagnostic Profiler is also used by the US Air Force for depot test programs, and Prognostics Framework is used by the US Army for several missile defense systems.

Licenses are amortized using a straight-line method over their estimated life of six years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, amortization expense related to the Company’s license amounted to ~~$5,250~~$5,250 and ~~$5,250, respectively,~~$5,250 and ~~$15,750~~$15,750 and ~~$5,250 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015,~~$15,750, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses on the Statements of ~~Operations~~Income and Comprehensive Income.

Note 4–IncomePerShare

~~Net~~Net income per common share information is computed using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, basic net income per common share is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The table below sets forth the calculation of the percentage of net earnings allocable to common shareholders under the two-class method:as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2016

2015

2016

2015

2017

2016

2017

2016

Basic earnings per common share:

Net income
20,726 36,736 30,559 298,238 $ 29,005 $ 20,726 $ 195,537 $ 30,559
Discount upon exchange of Preferred Stock, net of related fees
3,275 - 1,106,872 - - 3,275 - 1,106,872
24,001 36,736 1,137,431 298,238 29,005 24,001 195,537 1,137,431
Portion allocable to common shareholders
100.0 % 99.2 % 99.5 % 99.2 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 99.5 %
Net income available to common shareholders
24,001 36,442 1,131,744 295,852 $ 29,005 $ 24,001 $ 195,537 $ 1,131,744

Weighted average basic shares outstanding
32,419,016 31,947,753 32,048,486 32,064,778 35,555,742 32,419,016 35,246,893 32,048,486
Basic (loss) income per common share
$ - $ - $ 0.04 $ 0.01 $ - $ - $ 0.01 $ 0.04

Dilutive earnings per common share:

Net income allocable to common shareholders
24,001 36,442 1,131,744 295,852 $ 29,005 $ 24,001 $ 195,537 $ 1,131,744
Add: undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities
- 294 5,687 2,386 - - - 5,687
Numerator for diluted earnings per common share
24,001 36,736 1,137,431 298,238 29,005 24,001 195,537 1,137,431

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
32,419,016 31,947,753 32,048,486 32,064,778 35,555,742 32,419,016 35,246,893 32,048,486
Diluted effect:

Stock options
10,316 19,250 46,827 19,250 82,200 10,316 75,400 46,827
Unvested restricted stock units
6,087 19,250 5,263 19,250 224,263 6,087 202,564 5,263
Conversion equivalent of dilutive Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
429,294 3,307,299 2,194,224 3,307,299 - 429,294 - 2,194,224
Conversion equivalent of dilutive Convertible Preferred Stock
- 255,000 155,420 255,000 - - - 155,420
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding
32,864,713 35,548,552 34,450,220 35,665,577 35,862,205 32,864,713 35,524,857 34,450,220
Dilutive income per common share
$ - $ - $ 0.03 $ 0.01 $ - $ - $ 0.01 $ 0.03

Mikros~~Mikros~~ SystemsCorporation
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(unaudited)

The table below sets forth the calculation of the percentage of net earnings allocable to common shareholders under the ~~two-class method:~~two-class method in 2016.

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2016

2015

2016

2015

Numerator:

Weighted average participating common shares
32,419,016 31,947,753 32,048,486 32,064,778
Denominator:

Weighted average participating common shares
32,419,016 31,947,753 32,048,486 32,064,778
Add: Weighted average shares of Convertible Preferred Stock
- 255,000 155,420 255,000
Weighted average participating shares
32,419,016 32,202,753 32,203,906 32,319,778
Portion allocable to common shareholders
100.0 % 99.2 % 99.5 % 99.2 %

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Numerator:

Weighted average participating common shares
35,555,742 32,419,016 35,246,893 32,048,486
Denominator:

Weighted average participating common shares
35,555,742 32,419,016 35,246,893 32,048,486
Add: Weighted average shares of Convertible Preferred Stock
- - - 155,420
Weighted average participating shares
35,555,742 32,419,016 35,246,893 32,203,906
Portion allocable to common shareholders
100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 99.5 %

Diluted net income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015~~2016 does not reflect the following potential common shares, as the effect would be antidilutive.

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Stock options
- 610,000 - 610,000

Unvested restricted stock
60,000 - 60,000 -

June 30,

2016

2015

Stock options
610,000 610,000
Note~~Note~~ 5 – Income Tax Matters

The Company conducts an on-going analysis to review its net deferred tax asset and the need for a related valuation allowance. As a result of this analysis and the actual results of operations, the net deferred tax assets ~~changed~~decreased by ~~$12,940~~$63,260 and ~~$62,000~~$12,940 during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. The change in deferred tax assets is attributable to the reversal of various book/tax ~~differences.~~differences, utilization of income tax attributes, primarily federal net operating losses, as the Company anticipates annual earnings from operations to continue.

Note~~Note~~ 6 – Stock-Based Compensation

During ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,~~2017, the Company ~~did not issue stock awards. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, 7,000~~issued 70,000 shares ~~were exercised for proceeds in the amount~~ of $350. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for stock options of $37 and $37 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for stock options of $111 and $111 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The intrinsic value of the options as of September 30, 2016 is $1960.
~~As of September 30, 2016 and 2015, there were 451,000 and 44,000~~ restricted stock awards outstanding, respectively. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock of $577 and $644 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock of $1,753 and $1,932 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During, July 2016, the Company granted 407,000 restricted stock awards. Thewith a weighted average fair value of the restricted stock awards was determined on the date of grant using the closing stock price of $0.12. The fair value of the restricted stock awards will be amortized over the vesting period of three to five years utilizing the straight-line method.$0.46 per share. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~ 2017, there was ~~$48,840~~$29,740 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the restricted stock issued ~~in July 2016 that~~during 2017, which will be recognized in future periods.

~~Mikros Systems Corporation~~
~~Notes~~ During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, 67,000 options were exercised for proceeds amounting to ~~Condensed Financial Statements~~
~~(unaudited)~~
~~Note 7 – Recapitalization~~$12,350. The intrinsic value of the options as of September 30, 2017 is $56,550.

During the ~~second~~three and ~~third quarters of~~ nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~executed a series~~recognized stock-based compensation expense of ~~Exchange Agreements with the holders of a majority of its outstanding shares of preferred stock. Under the terms of the agreements~~$3,571 and ~~the redemption described below, each series of preferred stock was exchanged or redeemed for a combination of cash~~$614 and ~~shares of common stock, for the amounts set forth in the table below:~~

Series of
Preferred Stock

Amount
of Cash
per Share

Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Per Share

Convertible Preferred Shares
$ 0.165 1.95
Series B Shares
$ 0.0825 2.43
Series C Shares
$ 2.708 31.27
Series D Shares
$ 0.36232 5.072464
The Company entered into a separate exchange agreement (the “SBA Exchange Agreement”) with the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”), pursuant to which it agreed to pay $250,000 to the SBA in exchange for all shares of preferred stock, all 2,084,167 shares of common stock then owned by the SBA,$9,782 and the 1,658,540 shares of common stock which would have been issuable to the SBA if it had participated in the Exchange Agreements on the same terms as the other holders of the Company’s preferred stock. In June 2016, the Company conducted closings under the Exchange Agreements and the SBA Exchange Agreement, pursuant to which it issued an aggregate of 4,427,498 shares of common stock and made aggregate cash payments of $509,664. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 400,041 shares of common stock and made aggregate cash payments of $13,582 in order to redeem 164,626 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The Company anticipates that the redemption of the 44,345 remaining issued and outstanding Series B Preferred Shares and the 46,092 remaining issued and outstanding Series D Preferred Shares will be completed prior to the end of the Company’s current fiscal year.$1,864, respectively.
The Company determined the difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock and the cash paid to the holders of the preferred stock and the carrying amount of the preferred stock (net of issuance costs of $58,285) which amounted to $1,106,872 and added this amount to net income in the calculation of earnings per share (see Note 4 above). In addition, the discount upon exchange of the preferred stock (net of the related fees) was recorded in retained earnings since it represents a return from the preferred shareholders. The Company accounted for the purchase and subsequent retirement of the common stock from the SBA as the purchase of treasury stock and this was recorded based on the amount paid to repurchase its shares.
As a result of the approval of the recapitalization transactions and redemption, the Company has recorded the discount upon exchange of the preferred stock as of September 30, 2016 At September 30, 2016, the Company has recorded an extinguishment liability of $20,359 which represents the cash to be paid upon redemption of the remaining preferred stock.

CAUTIONARY~~CAUTIONARY~~ STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains “forward-looking statements” – that is, statements related to future, not past, events. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance and financial condition, and often contain words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “see,” or “will.” These forward- looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For us, particular uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward- looking statements include: changes in business conditions; a decline or redirection of the U.S. defense budget; the termination of any contracts with the U.S. Government; changes in our sales strategy and product development plans; changes in the marketplace; continued services of our executive management team; our limited marketing experience; competition between us and other companies seeking Small Business Innovative Research (“SBIR”) grants; competitive pricing pressures; market acceptance of our products under development; delays in the development of products; our ability to adequately integrate our ~~new~~ software offerings into our business ~~model;~~model, our ability to develop and market solutions for commercial customers, numerous other matters of national, regional and global scale, including those of a political, economic, business and competitive nature; statements of assumption underlying any of the foregoing, as well as other factors set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. WeExcept as required by law, we assume no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements.

Item~~Item~~ 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Results of Operations.

Mikros Systems Corporation (the “Company”, “we” or “us”) designs and manufactures software, hardware and electronic systems used to maintain complex distributed systems. Examples of such systems include defense equipment such as radars and combat systems, and commercial and industrial applications such as printing presses, power distribution, ~~and~~ utility systems, and Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) systems.

Over the past decade, our principal customer has been the U.S. Department of Defense, primarily the U.S. Navy. We provide the following two key systems to the Navy for maintenance of radars and combat systems:

●
ADEPT®, the Adaptive Diagnostic Electronic Portable Testset, is a PC-based maintenance automation workstation used to maintain the ~~Navy’s~~Navy’s premier AN/SPY-1 phased array radar on cruisers and ~~destroyers; and~~destroyers.
●
ADSSS, the ADEPT Distance Support Sensor Suite, is a Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) system used to monitor Combat System Elements (CSEs) onboard the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).

More recently, we ~~acquired certain~~have developed and marketed software ~~and related assets from VSE Corporation. The software is used in our Prognostics Framework® (PF) and Diagnostic Profiler® (DP)~~ products to analyze maintenance data collected from target systems, optimize maintenance procedures, and predict failures. ~~These~~Our Prognostics Framework® (PF) and Diagnostic Profiler® (DP) products provide software capabilities which complement our maintenance hardware products (ADEPT and ADSSS), and allow us to provide complete hardware/software solutions for advanced maintenance, particularly of complex distributed systems. Now that we have a complete hardware/software solution for advanced maintenance, we are expanding into commercial and industrial markets.
~~Product Portfolio~~

Product Portfolio
Adaptive Diagnostic Electronic Portable Testset ~~(ADEPT®)~~(ADEPT). ADEPT is an automated maintenance workstation designed to significantly reduce the time required to align the AN/SPY-1 Radar System aboard U.S. Navy Aegis cruisers and destroyers, while optimizing system performance and readiness. ADEPT Systems are currently deploying on all Aegis CG and DDG platforms to support the AN/SPY1 radar system. ADEPT represents an innovative approach to Navy shipboard maintenance, integrating modular instrumentation cards in a rugged enclosure with an onboard computer, input and output devices, networking hardware, removable hard drives, and a touch-screen display. A custom software application provides the user interface and integrates the hardware with a database that stores user information, instrument readings, maintenance requirements, and training aids. ADEPT is designed to be adapted to other complex shipboard systems, and provide integrated distance support capabilities for remote diagnostics and troubleshooting by shore-based Navy experts.
Since the system uses commercial instrument case and modules, ADEPT units can be modified to support both preventative maintenance and condition-based maintenance of other radars and complex electronic systems in military or commercial applications. In that regard, we have a service contract with the U.S. Navy to extend ADEPT to a second U.S. Navy radar system, the SPS-49. These services are expected to assist in optimizing performance for the Ballistic Missile Defense Mission. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~the date of this report, we have delivered a total of ~~189~~ 194 ADEPT units.

Adaptive Distance Support Sensor Suite (ADSSS). In 2013, we started development of ~~ADSS~~the ADEPT Distance Support Sensor Suite, or ADSSS, for the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship (“LCS”). The LCS is the U.S. Navy’s latest combat warship. ADSSS is a network-enabled system that can be configured to monitor multiple shipboard systems and report maintenance data onshore for further analysis to detect trends and predict failures. ADSSS provides an open architecture approach with industry standard hardware, and cybersecurity compliant software to acquire and process system operational and maintenance data. ADSSS fully automates the capture of system operation, environment and maintenance data to provide unattended operation. The system monitors key parameters and sends alert notifications when parameters move out of tolerance.
A pilot version of ADSSS has been deployed on the LCS Class since 2014. Development of the production system is ongoing and initial shipboard testing ~~is planned for late 2016.~~was completed in 2016. In July 2017, we installed the first ADSSS system on the LCS Class. We expect ADSSS to be used on both variants of the LCS, currently planned to be at least 32 ships. ADSSS, with its remote monitoring and prognostics capabilities, has also generated interest in other ship classes, including Aegis, and we are currently pursuing several related opportunities.

Diagnostic ~~Profiler®~~. Profiler. The Diagnostic ~~Profiler®~~Profiler is an integrated development environment for developing diagnostic capabilities used in maintenance, embedded diagnostics and troubleshooting applications. The software provides diagnostic services to its host application, including fault call-outs, suggested “next best” test to further isolate faults, and direct maintenance actions. When additional faults are identified, the software prioritizes the fault call-outs by probability. The use of the diagnostic profiler eliminates the need for the development and maintenance of diagnostic flow charts and hard-coded text sequences. This reduces the effort required to correct bugs and design changes and over the life of the system, could result in significant cost savings.

Prognostics ~~Framework®~~. Framework. Prognostics ~~Framework®~~Framework is an analysis software for framework that implements real-time prognostics, diagnostics and status monitoring to support embedded prognostic applications, health management systems and condition-based maintenance applications. The Prognostics Framework software institutes an information framework that organizes relevant data related to: (i) the condition of the system; (ii) the system’s ability to perform required functions over specific time intervals; and (iii) the need for maintenance actions and repair parts. The Prognostics Framework has been used to implement a complete health management system on one of the first radar systems to require prognostics as a key element of its overall solutions. Other potential applications include complex computer networks, power generators, power supply, cooling and environmental systems.

~~Recent Developments~~
On September 12, 2016, we were awarded and entered into a multi-year Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (“IDIQ”) contract with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division, relating to our ADSSS product. The contract provides for the purchase and sale of up to $48 million of ADSSS units and related engineering and logistics support. The first delivery order in the amount of $3,032,993 was awarded on September 15, 2016 to perform installations, support and logistics for the LCS classes.
Government Contracts
On March 18, 2010, we were awarded and entered into a multi-year IDIQ contract with the Naval Surface Warfare Center related to our ADEPT product. The contract provides for the purchase and sale of up to $26 million of ADEPT units and related engineering and logistics support. The initial term of the contract was five years, and the period of performance has been extended through February 13, 2017, to conclude some development programs. Substantially all of our revenue is attributable to our ADEPT product. In the past, we were generating revenues primarily from the production and delivery of ADEPT units. After executing the ADEPT program for six years, we now have contracts to do further research and development on ADEPT units to enhance functionality as well as provide other forms of support. We expect additional contract awards during the remaining term of the contract.
In August 2013, we were awarded a $5.5 million service contract under our IDIQ contract to provide necessary research, development, and program management and implementation of improvements to ADEPT units. We received an initial commitment of $0.8 million under this service contract which was increased to $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2014.
~~In January 2014, we were awarded a $0.5 million contract by the U.S. Navy that will extend the ADEPT system to a second Navy radar, the SPS-49 long-range air surveillance radar.~~
During the second quarter of 2014, we were awarded four contracts collectively valued at approximately $1.0 million. Two of the awards are to support and improve our ADEPT product line by providing funding for continued training of Navy personnel and a new development effort to upgrade ADEPT instrumentation functions for data acquisition. The remaining two awards are to upgrade the ADSSS system for the Navy's new LCS. Under the first ADSSS contract, we will design a new portable maintenance device for shipboard use, working closely with the Naval Ship Systems Engineering Station (“NAVSSES”) office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The second ADSSS award funds the installation of CBM equipment on the USS Fort Worth and continued shipboard testing. This "Pilot Program" extends our pilot installation of ADSSS on the USS Freedom, a project that was described by our Navy customer as "completely successful".

In July 2014, we were awarded additional funding of $0.3 million under the current IDIQ contract to upgrade the capabilities of the first 66 ADEPT units currently deployed in the fleet. This effort involves installing a faster and more capable controller module and upgrading the Operating System software from Windows XP to Windows 7, and will be executed as units are returned for routine calibration.
In November 2014, we were awarded a contract valued at $0.1 million for technical support on the USS Fort Worth (LCS3) using the latest version of our ADSSS (which will provide the SPS-75 Air Search Radar and Rolling Airframe (RAM) systems with Combat Systems (CS) Condition Based Monitoring (CBM) and Distance Support (DS) capability.
In March 2015, the Navy also issued an additional contract for ADEPT General Engineering and Support, with initial funding of $0.1 million. This contract covers various technical tasking for deployed ADEPT systems, including logistics support, customer consultation and regularly scheduled team review meetings.
~~In May 2015, we received a study contract valued at $30 thousand from Lockheed Martin Corporation, to start work with Lockheed Martin on Condition Based Maintenance for Aegis systems.~~
In August 2015, we received a contract award valued at approximately $0.2 million for the calibration of 45 additional ADEPT units. This is the seventh contract award of this type that we have received in support of the calibration effort. We also received two contracts in September 2015, for software development on the SLA-10B and SPQ-9B radars, totaling approximately $0.25 million. We have been tasked to define how the ADEPT tool can help support testing of the SPQ-9B system on Self Defense Test Ships (SDTS).
In September 2015, we entered into a contract modification for our current service contract for LCS systems using the ADSSS, which added an additional $1.5 million for ongoing development. This funding will extend the program until September 30, 2016, and allow us to perform installations and support for the LCS classes.
In March 2016, we received a contract award valued at approximately $0.15 million to provide Initial System Familiarization Training of the ADEPT system on all CG-47 and DDG-51 Class ships. The first event in Norfolk has already occurred, and a second event in San Diego is currently scheduled for May.
In April 2016, we received three contracts to continue logistics support of the ADEPT maintenance automation workstation. A contract valued at approximately $0.3 million to provide ADEPT General Engineering and Support was awarded, along with two other logistics contracts to perform necessary updates, repair and calibration on the ADEPT units, totaling $0.25 million. Along with the contracts received for our ADEPT product, we received a follow on contract in the amount of $0.1 million, for technical support on the USS Fort Worth (LCS3) using the latest version of our ADSSS.
In July 2016, we received two (2) additional contract modifications for our current service contract for LCS systems using the ADSSS, which added an additional $4.65 million for ongoing development. This funding will extend the program until June 2018, and allow us to perform installations and support for the LCS classes.

In September 2016 we were awarded and entered into a multi-year IDIQ contract with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division, relating to the ADSSS product. The contract has a term of five years and provides for the purchase and sale of up to $48 million of ~~the~~ ADSSS units and related engineering and logistics support. ~~See “Recent Developments” above~~The first delivery order in the amount of $3.0 million was awarded on September 15, 2016, to perform installations, support, and logistics for ~~additional information.~~the LCS class.

In ~~September 2016,~~February 2017 we ~~also~~were awarded a follow-on multi-year Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase III IDIQ contract with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division, for our ADEPT program. The contract provides for the purchase and sale of up to $35.1 million of ADEPT units and related engineering, such as calibration, repair, training and other sustainment services. The first delivery order for $1.1 million was awarded in February 2017 to build eleven ADEPT systems for continuing fleet support on all Aegis cruisers and destroyers.
In March 2017 we were awarded the second and third delivery orders for engineering services in the amount of $11.5 million which will be funded incrementally and facilitate the engineering and technical support for the ADEPT program during the next three years. The third delivery order contract for $0.6 million is to provide sustainment services, such as calibration, repair, evaluations, and screenings of ADEPT units to be performed in our Manufacturing and Depot (M&D) Center in Largo, Florida.
In April 2017 we received ~~multiple contracts~~contract awards totaling ~~almost~~$2.0 million from the U.S. Navy to extend the capabilities of the ADSSS Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) system to support a fourth Navy radar system, the MK 99. The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) office in Dahlgren, VA provided $0.5 million of the total funding to support this effort. Along with those awards, we received the fourth delivery order for $0.1 million under the existing ADEPT IDIQ contract, to provide training to sailors in the fleet to operate the ADEPT maintenance automation workstation.
In July 2017 and November 2017 we received modifications which added funding to our ADEPT IDIQ Contract, for engineering services in the amounts of $0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively. These awards will allow us to continue ~~logistics~~to support of the ADEPT ~~maintenance workstation. These contracts include~~product line in the fleet, implement necessary software enhancements, and provide general ~~engineering~~ support ~~repair, calibration and training.~~of the program.

~~It should be noted that contracting with~~In August 2017 we received a modification to our ADEPT sustainment delivery order, adding $0.5 million to allow our M&D Center in Largo, Florida to continue providing bi-annual sustainment services for units cycling through the ~~Federal government is~~depot center from the fleet. The sustainment efforts include implementing modifications of existing units (54 in total) awaiting fielding.
In September 2017 we received a ~~lengthy~~delivery order in the amount of $2.4 million for the production and ~~complex process~~delivery of ADEPT units under our Phase III IDIQ contract at NSWC Crane. These new units will continue our fleet support on Aegis cruisers and ~~that many factors could materialize that would negatively impact our ability to secure future contracts. In addition, our contracts with~~destroyers in the ~~Federal government contain unfavorable termination provisions and are subject to audit and modification.~~U.S. Navy.

Key Performance Indicator

As substantially all of our revenue is derived from contracts with the ~~Federal~~federal government, our key performance indicator is the dollar volume of contracts and delivery orders awarded to ~~us.~~us under our IDIQ contracts. Increases in the number and value of contracts awarded will generally result in increased revenues in future periods and, assuming relatively stable variable costs associated with our fulfilling such ~~contracts,~~awards, increased profits in future periods. The timing of such awards is uncertain as we sell to ~~Federal~~federal government agencies where the process of obtaining such awards can be lengthy and at times uncertain. ~~Continued~~As the majority of our revenue in 2016, and expected revenue in 2017, is or will be from sales of ADEPT units and ADSSS systems under our IDIQ contracts, continued generation of ~~task~~delivery orders and our ability to expand the ~~markets~~market and potential ~~customers~~customer base for ~~our~~ ADEPT ~~and ADSSS products~~units will be a key indicator of future ~~revenue~~.revenue. ADEPT units must be serviced and calibrated every two years. Accordingly, as we continue to increase the installed base of ADEPT units and expand the units to other radar systems, we expect to generate future recurring maintenance and service revenue.

Outlook

Our strategy for continued growth is based on continuing expansion of our defense business, plus new initiatives to ~~market~~apply our advanced maintenance technology toin commercial markets. ~~First,~~With regard to the defense industry, we expect to continue expanding our technology base, backlog and revenue by continuing our active participation in the DoD SBIR program and bidding on projects that fall within our areas of expertise. These areas include electronic systems engineering and integration, radar systems engineering, combat/C4I (Command, Control, Communications, Computers & Intelligence) systems engineering, and communications engineering. We believe that we can ~~utilize~~use the technology and intellectual property developed under our various SBIR awards to develop proprietary products ~~such as ADEPT,~~ with broad appeal in both ~~the~~ government and commercial ~~marketplace. Our state-of-the-art test equipment can be used by many commercial and governmental customers such as the FAA, radio and television stations, cell phone stations, and airlines.~~markets. Second, we will continue to pursue SBIR projects with the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Navy, and other government agencies. Third, we believe that through our marketing of products, such as ADEPT, we will develop key relationships with prime defense contractors. Our strategy is to develop these relationships into long-term, key subcontractor roles on future major defense programs awarded to these prime contractors.

~~In addition,~~With regard to commercial markets, our ~~new commercial~~Diagnostics Profiler and Prognostics Framework software offerings complement our hardware products and allow us to provide complete hardware/software solutions for advanced maintenance applications. Current customers for these systems include major multinational corporations such as HP, which recently extended our Diagnostic Profiler software support with for a fifth year. We continue to receive repeat orders from these customers to support their applications. We plan to provide “condition-based maintenance” systems for applications such as FAA radar surveillance and support systems, power distribution and utilities infrastructure, commercial shipping, cooling and environmental systems, and other “complex distributed ~~systems.” Customers~~systems” to commercial customers. In that regard, we are currently developing a condition-based maintenance solution for ~~these systems include major multinational corporations.~~heating ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC) equipment based on our proprietary Prognostics Framework solution. We have ~~received several repeat orders from these customers and continue~~deployed two active pilot systems that are providing key maintenance data on a daily basis to ~~support their applications.~~service technicians.

In ~~2016,~~2017, our primary strategic focus is to continue as a premium provider of R&D and product development services to the defense industry, generate multiple delivery orders under our two IDIQ contracts, extend ADEPT and ADSSS to additional combat systems and ship classes, and expand our commercial business through marketing and sales of our Prognostics Framework and Diagnostic Profiler software products. ~~From an operational prospective, we expect~~We will also seek to ~~focus substantial resources on generating purchase orders under the IDIQ contracts for ADSSS~~generate incremental revenue through providing light assembly and ~~ADEPT units, expanding ADEPT~~production services to ~~support other radar systems~~commercial customers at our manufacturing and exploring commercialization opportunities. As the installed base increases, we expect additional and recurring revenue for calibration and other maintenance and support. In January 2014, we were awarded a contract to extend the ADEPT system to a second U.S. Navy radar system, the SPS-49, which is expected to assistdepot center in ~~optimizing performance for the Ballistic Missile Defense Mission.~~Largo, Florida.

Over the longer term, we intend to further develop advanced maintenance technologies and implement these technologies in products for deployment in defense applications and to expand into additional commercial applications. We believe that many of our core capabilities, remote monitoring, rugged systems, predictive maintenance and communications expertise, are applicable to other industries that work with complex distributed systems, such as utilities, communications and transportation ~~systems.~~systems, and building maintenance. We are currently in discussions with certain industry participants regarding this initiative.

During the past two fiscal years, the combination of spending caps, discretionary spending cuts, sequestration and further proposed reductions in defense spending has caused, and may in the future continue to cause, delays in funding certain projects. This may negatively impact our revenues and profits.

Changes to Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our critical accounting policies and estimates are set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there have been no changes to such critical accounting policies and estimates.

Results~~Results~~ of Operations

ThreeMonthsEnded September 30~~2016~~, 2017and~~2015~~2016

We generated revenues of $1,551,620 during the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $1,180,491 during the three months ended September 30, 2016, ~~compared to $1,240,393 during the three months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease~~an increase of ~~$59,902,~~$371,129, or 5%31%. The ~~decrease~~increase was due primarily ~~due~~ to ~~the completion of the~~a production ~~contracts~~order for 6411 ADEPT units in ~~2015~~February 2017 and ~~significant delays in~~ the ~~award~~receipt of ~~several Navy contracts. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we received a $48 million IDIQ contract for our ADSSS system and expect~~ additional contracts for engineering services, support and repairs and calibration services amounting to be awarded during the fourth quarter and into 2017. Delays in the award of contracts are not uncommon in the current defense contracting environment and we may experience similar delays in future periods.$3,355,938.

Cost of sales consists of direct contract costs including labor, material, subcontracts, warranty expense for ADEPT units that have been delivered, travel, and other direct costs. Cost of sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$446,810~~$636,128 compared to ~~$529,303~~$446,810 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015, a decrease~~2016, an increase of ~~$82,493~~$189,318 or ~~16%~~42%. The ~~decrease~~increase was due primarily ~~due~~ to the ~~completion~~receipt of ~~the~~a production ~~contracts~~order for 6411 ADEPT units in ~~2015.~~February 2017 and the receipt of four additional contracts for engineering services, support and repairs and calibration services. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales ~~decreased~~was 41% of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 38% of revenues for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016 as compared to 43% of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015.~~2016. The ~~decrease was primarily~~increase is due to ~~the change of the mix of~~an increase in production costs ~~incurred in 2016~~ and ~~the expiration of warranty reserve expirations, which amounts were partially offset by slight increases in~~other direct ~~labor, material and subcontract costs related to engineering service contracts awarded in the first quarter of 2016.~~costs.

The majority of our engineering costs consist of (i) salary, wages and related fringe benefits paid to engineering employees, (ii) rent-related costs, and (iii) consulting fees paid to engineering consultants. As the nature of these costs benefit the entire organization and all research and development efforts, and their benefit cannot be identified with a specific project or contract, these engineering costs are classified as part of “engineering overhead” and included in operating expenses. Engineering costs for the three months ended September ~~30,2016~~30, 2017 were ~~$421,296~~$530,477 compared to ~~$309,769~~$421,296 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, an increase of ~~$111,527,~~$109,181, or ~~36%~~26%. The increase was ~~primarily~~ due to ~~higher consulting fees,~~significant increases in fringe benefits and engineering salaries ~~computer, software~~due to the hiring of six additional employees, recruiting costs, travel and ~~related~~subsistence expenses, engineering consulting costs, and incentive ~~compensation expense.~~compensation.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salary, intellectual property, consulting fees and related costs, professional fees, business insurance, franchise tax, SEC compliance costs, travel, and unallowable expenses (representing those expenses for which the government will not reimburse ~~us)~~us, including independent research and development (IR&D) which consists of research and development expenses unrelated to our defense contracts). General and administrative costs for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 were ~~$261,528~~$379,407 compared to ~~$328,734~~$261,528 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015, a decrease~~2016, an increase of ~~$67,206,~~$117,879, or ~~20%~~45%. The ~~decrease in 2016~~increase was due primarily to ~~reductions~~increases in ~~bid and proposal (“B&P”) costs, independent~~salaries, incentive compensation, research and development ~~(“IR&D”), and general and administrative (“G&A”) salaries~~costs, and professional fees.

At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we estimated our annual effective tax rate for ~~2016~~2017 to be ~~60%~~46%. We recognized a tax ~~expense~~benefit of ~~$31,136~~$(22,695) for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 primarily due to ~~expected net income for the remainder of 2016.~~stock compensation related tax deductions and tax credits. At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the difference from the expected federal income tax rate is attributable to state income taxes and certain permanent book-tax differences.
NineMonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2017and2016

We ~~reported a net income~~ generated revenues of ~~$20,726 for~~$5,047,456 during the ~~three~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 as~~2017 compared to ~~net income of $36,736 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2016.~~
~~Nine~~~~Months~~~~Ended~~ ~~September 30,~~~~2016~~~~and~~~~2015~~
~~We generated revenues of~~ $3,146,792 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, ~~compared~~an increase of $1,900,664, or 60%. The increase was due primarily to ~~$5,450,815 during~~a production order for 11 ADEPT units in February 2017 and the receipt of ten additional contracts for engineering services, support and repairs and calibration services amounting to $6,756,321.
Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015, a decrease of $2,304,023, or 42%. The decrease~~2017 was ~~primarily due~~$1,909,246 compared to the completion of the production contracts for 64 ADEPT units in 2015 and significant delays in the award of several Navy contracts. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we received a $48 million IDIQ contract for our ADSSS system and expect additional contracts to be awarded during the fourth quarter and into 2017. Delays in the award of contracts are not uncommon in the current defense contracting environment and we may experience similar delays in future periods.

~~Cost of sales consists of direct contract costs including labor, material, subcontracts, warranty expense for ADEPT units that have been delivered, travel, and other direct costs. Cost of sales~~$1,120,664 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, ~~was $1,120,664 compared to $2,868,377 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease~~an increase of ~~$1,747,713,~~$788,582 or ~~61%~~70%. The ~~decrease~~increase was due primarily ~~due~~ to the ~~completion~~receipt of ~~the~~a production ~~contracts~~order for 6411 ADEPT units in ~~2015.~~February 2017 and the receipt of ten additional contracts for engineering services, support and repairs, and calibration services. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales ~~decreased~~was 38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 36% of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 as compared to 53% of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~2016. The ~~decrease was primarily~~increase is due to ~~the change of the mix of~~an increase in production costs ~~incurred in 2016~~ and ~~significant decreases in material purchases due to delays in receiving production contracts. These amounts were partially offset by slight increases in~~other direct ~~labor and subcontract costs related to engineering service contracts awarded in the first quarter of 2016.~~costs.

The majority of our engineering costs consist of (i) salary, wages and related fringe benefits paid to engineering employees, (ii) rent-related costs, and (iii) consulting fees paid to engineering consultants. As the nature of these costs benefit the entire organization and all research and development efforts, and their benefit cannot be identified with a specific project or contract, these engineering costs are classified as part of “engineering overhead” and included in operating expenses. Engineering costs for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 were ~~$1,058,058~~$1,587,069 compared to ~~$1,058,705~~$1,058,058 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~
~~General~~2016, an increase of $529,011, or 50%. The increase was due to significant increases in fringe benefits and ~~administrative expenses consist primarily~~engineering salaries due to the hiring of ~~salary, intellectual property, consulting fees and related costs, professional fees, business insurance, franchise tax, SEC compliance~~six additional employees, recruiting costs, travel and ~~unallowable~~subsistence expenses, ~~(representing those expenses for which the government will not reimburse us).~~ engineering consulting costs and incentive compensation.

General and administrative costs for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 were ~~$894,430~~$1,218,694 compared to ~~$951,331~~$894,430 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015, a decrease~~2016, an increase of ~~56,901,~~$324,264, or 6%36%. The ~~decrease in 2016~~increase was due primarily to ~~decreases~~increases in salaries, incentive compensation, ~~professional fees and general and administrative salaries offset by increases in business development,~~ research and development costs, and ~~SEC compliance costs.~~professional fees.

At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we estimated our annual ~~effective~~effective tax rate for ~~2016~~2017 to be ~~61%~~42%. We recognized a tax expense of ~~$46,791~~$139,064 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 primarily due to expected net income for the remainder of ~~2016.~~2017. At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the difference from the expected federal income tax rate is attributable to state income taxes and certain permanent book-tax differences.

We reported a net income of $30,559 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to net income of $298,238 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Liquidity~~Liquidity~~andCapitalResources

Since our inception, we have financed our operations through debt, private and public offerings of equity securities, and cash generated by operations.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, net cash provided by operations was $302,293 compared to net cash used in operations ~~was~~of $965,768 ~~compared to net cash provided by operations of $485,964~~ during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~decrease~~increase was due primarily ~~due a decrease~~to an increase in net income of ~~$267,679~~$164,978 and the timing of receipts and payments related to our operating assets and liabilities.

We currently do not have any outstanding loan or line of credit with any bank or financial institution. We believe our available cash resources and expected cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund operations for the next twelve months. We do not expect to incur any material capital expenditures during the next twelve months.
~~During the second and third quarters of 2016, we completed a recapitalization transaction (the “Recapitalization Transaction~~”) pursuant to which all issued and outstanding shares of our preferred stock were exchanged or redeemed for a combination of cash and shares of our common stock in the amounts set forth in the table below.

Series of
Preferred Stock

Amount
of Cash
per Share

Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Per Share

Convertible Preferred Shares
$ 0.165 1.95
Series B Shares
$ 0.0825 2.43
Series C Shares
$ 2.708 31.27
Series D Shares
$ 0.36232 5.072464
As part of the Recapitalization Transaction, we also repurchased 2,084,167 shares of common stock owned by the United States Small Business Administration. Pursuant to the Recapitalization Transaction, we made aggregate cash payments of $544,017, issued 5,173,973 shares of common stock which resulted in the net issuance of 3,089,806 additional shares of common stock, and eliminated $2,955,433 of aggregate liquidation preferences applicable to our previously outstanding shares of preferred stock.

In order to pursue strategic opportunities, obtain additional SBIR contracts, or acquire strategic assets or businesses, we may need to obtain additional financing or seek strategic alliances or other partnership agreements with other entities. In order to raise any such financing, we anticipate considering the sale of additional debt or equity securities under appropriate market conditions. There can be no assurance, assuming we successfully raise additional funds or enter into business alliances, that we will remain profitable or continue to generate positive cash flow.

Off-BalanceSheetArrangements

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off- balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Item~~Item~~4.ControlsandProcedures.

An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was carried out by us under the supervision and with the participation of our ~~president,~~Chief Executive Officer, who serves as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based upon that evaluation, our ~~president~~Chief Executive Officer concluded that as of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure (i) that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our president, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d- 15(f)) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART~~PART~~ II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, we issued 5,000 shares of common stock to an employee upon exercise of options in consideration of cash payment of $1,000. The forgoing shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, we issued 10,000 shares of restricted common stock to a new employee which vest in equal annual installments over a five year period. The forgoing shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item6.Exhibits

No. ~~Item~~6.~~Exhibits~~
Description
~~No.~~ ~~Description~~
3.1
~~Certificate of Elimination of~~Amendment to the ~~Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock, and Series D Preferred Stock~~By-laws of Mikros Systems Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form ~~8-k ,~~8-K filed with the SEC on July ~~13, 2016)~~28, 2017)
10.1
Mikros Systems Corporation 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 28, 2017)
10.2
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Mikros Systems Corporation 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 28, 2017)
10.3
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Mikros Systems Corporation 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 28, 2017)
31.1
Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) ~~or 15d- 14(a)~~ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS
~~101.INS~~
XBRL Instance

101.SCH
~~101.SCH~~
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL
~~101.CAL~~
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF
~~101.DEF~~
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB
~~101.LAB~~
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE
~~101.PRE~~
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MIKROS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

November 14, ~~2016~~
2017
By:
/s/ Thomas J. Meaney

Thomas J. Meaney

~~President~~Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

1815

	Preferred Stock Series B $0.01 Par Value						Convertible Preferred Stock $0.01 Par Value						Preferred Stock Series D $0.01 Par Value						Common Stock $0.01 Par Value						Capital in Excess			Accumulated
	Number of shares			Par Value			Number of shares			Par Value			Number of shares			Par Value			Number of shares			Par Value			of Par Value			Deficit			Total
Balance at December 31, 2015		1,102,433		$	11,024			255,000		$	2,550			690,000		$	6,900			32,025,753		$	320,258		$	11,631,732		$	(9,785,130	)	$	2,187,334

Extinguishment of Preferred Stock in exchange for cash and Common Stock		(1,058,088	)		(10,581	)		(255,000	)		(2,550	)		(643,908	)		(6,439	)		4,827,539			48,275			(1,509,565	)		1,106,872			(373,988	)
Purchase of Common Stock																				(2,084,167	)		(20,842	)		(126,609	)					(147,451	)
Common shares issued to employees and directors																				407,000			4,070			(4,070	)					-
Stock compensation		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			1,864			-			1,864
Exercise of non-restricted stock awards		-			-			-			-			-			-			7,000			70			280			-			350
Net income		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			30,559			30,559

Balance at September 30, 2016		44,345		$	443			-		$	-			46,092		$	461			35,183,125		$	351,831		$	9,993,632		$	(8,647,699	)	$	1,698,668

	None months ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2016			2015

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	30,559		$	298,238
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		27,930			10,482
Deferred tax expense		12,940			62,000
Share-based compensation expense		1,864			2,043
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in receivables on government contracts		(223,968	)		553,847
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(267,592	)		9,590
Decrease in accrued payroll and payroll taxes		(261,950	)		(60,138	)
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(200,115	)		(527,290	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued warranty expense		(103,356	)		105,910
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue		(5,250	)		36,000
Increase (Decrease) in long-term liabilities		23,170			(4,718	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(965,768	)		485,964
Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments related to intangible assets		(1,533	)		-
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(2,693	)
Net cash used in investing activities:		(1,533	)		(2,693	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments to preferred shareholders in conjunction with a recapitalization		(375,795	)		-
Payments to acquire and retire Common Stock		(147,451	)		-
Professional fees paid in conjunction with recapitalization		(58,285	)		-
Exercise of stock options		350			350
Net cash used in financing activities:		(581,181	)		350
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,548,482	)		483,621
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		2,858,655			1,161,634
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,310,173		$	1,645,255
Supplement cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	69,500		$	215,183

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock in exchange for preferred stock	$	525,830
Recognition of an extinguishment liability in exchange for preferred stock	$	33,941
Estimated consideration to be paid in connection with purchase of intangible asset				$	126,000

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2017			2016

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	195,537		$	30,559
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in ) operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization		33,657			27,930
Deferred tax expense		63,260			12,940
Share-based compensation expense		9,783			1,864
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in receivables on government contracts		339,333			(223,968	)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(27,622	)		(267,592	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and payroll taxes		49,286			(261,950	)
(Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(140,765	)		(200,115	)
(Decrease) in accrued warranty expense		(240,980	)		(103,356	)
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue		22,500			(5,250	)
(Decrease) increase in long-term liabilities		(1,696	)		23,170
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		302,293			(965,768	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Payments related to intangible assets		(4,983	)		(1,533	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(88,739	)		-
Net cash used in investing activities:		(93,722	)		(1,533	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Exercise of stock options		12,350			350
Payments to preferred shareholders in conjunction with a recapitalization		-			(375,795	)
Payments to acquire and retire Common Stock		-			(147,451	)
Professional fees paid in conjunction with recapitalization		-			(58,285	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities:		12,350			(581,181	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		220,921			(1,548,482	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		858,868			2,858,655
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,079,789		$	1,310,173
Supplement cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	70,150		$	69,500

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock in in exchange for preferred stock				$	525,830
Recognition of an extinguishment liability in exchange for preferred stock				$	33,941

	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Balance, beginning of the period	$	240,980		$	359,654
Provision for product warranty		-			1,800
Product warranty expirations		(238,967	)		(86,301	)
Product warranty costs paid		(2,013	)		(34,173	)
Balance, end of the period	$	-		$	240,980

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015

Salaries	$	12,288	$	24,890	$	49,292	$	34,625
Other costs		1,600		-		9,852		-
	$	13,888	$	24,890	$	59,144	$	34,625

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Basic earnings per common share:
Net income		20,726			36,736			30,559			298,238		$	29,005		$	20,726		$	195,537		$	30,559
Discount upon exchange of Preferred Stock, net of related fees		3,275			-			1,106,872			-			-			3,275			-			1,106,872
		24,001			36,736			1,137,431			298,238			29,005			24,001			195,537			1,137,431
Portion allocable to common shareholders		100.0	%		99.2	%		99.5	%		99.2	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		99.5	%
Net income available to common shareholders		24,001			36,442			1,131,744			295,852		$	29,005		$	24,001		$	195,537		$	1,131,744

Weighted average basic shares outstanding		32,419,016			31,947,753			32,048,486			32,064,778			35,555,742			32,419,016			35,246,893			32,048,486
Basic (loss) income per common share	$	-		$	-		$	0.04		$	0.01		$	-		$	-		$	0.01		$	0.04

Dilutive earnings per common share:
Net income allocable to common shareholders		24,001			36,442			1,131,744			295,852		$	29,005		$	24,001		$	195,537		$	1,131,744
Add: undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities		-			294			5,687			2,386			-			-			-			5,687
Numerator for diluted earnings per common share		24,001			36,736			1,137,431			298,238			29,005			24,001			195,537			1,137,431

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		32,419,016			31,947,753			32,048,486			32,064,778			35,555,742			32,419,016			35,246,893			32,048,486
Diluted effect:
Stock options		10,316			19,250			46,827			19,250			82,200			10,316			75,400			46,827
Unvested restricted stock units		6,087			19,250			5,263			19,250			224,263			6,087			202,564			5,263
Conversion equivalent of dilutive Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		429,294			3,307,299			2,194,224			3,307,299			-			429,294			-			2,194,224
Conversion equivalent of dilutive Convertible Preferred Stock		-			255,000			155,420			255,000			-			-			-			155,420
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding		32,864,713			35,548,552			34,450,220			35,665,577			35,862,205			32,864,713			35,524,857			34,450,220
Dilutive income per common share	$	-		$	-		$	0.03		$	0.01		$	-		$	-		$	0.01		$	0.03

Series of Preferred Stock	Amount of Cash per Share		Number of Shares of Common Stock Per Share
Convertible Preferred Shares	$	0.165		1.95
Series B Shares	$	0.0825		2.43
Series C Shares	$	2.708		31.27
Series D Shares	$	0.36232		5.072464

No.	~~Item~~6.~~Exhibits~~ Description

	~~No.~~	~~Description~~

	3.1	~~Certificate of Elimination of~~Amendment to the ~~Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock, and Series D Preferred Stock~~By-laws of Mikros Systems Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form ~~8-k ,~~8-K filed with the SEC on July ~~13, 2016)~~28, 2017)


	32.1	Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS	~~101.INS~~	XBRL Instance

101.SCH	~~101.SCH~~	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL	~~101.CAL~~	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF	~~101.DEF~~	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB	~~101.LAB~~	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE	~~101.PRE~~	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

	MIKROS SYSTEMS CORPORATION


November 14, ~~2016~~ 2017	By:	/s/ Thomas J. Meaney


		Thomas J. Meaney
		~~President~~Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer