The unaudited, interim consolidated financial statements of SPAR Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("SGRP"), and its subsidiaries (together with SGRP, collectively, the "Company" or the "SPAR Group"), accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended September 30, 2017 (this "Quarterly Report"), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, has been compiled from the Company's audited consolidated balance sheet as of such date. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in these interim financial statements. However, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the Company as contained in the SGRP's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on April 17, 2017 (the "2016 Annual Report"), and SGRP's Proxy Statement for its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders as filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017 (the "2017 Proxy Statement"). Particular attention should be given to Items 1 and 1A of the 2016 Annual Report respecting the Company's Business and Risk Factors, respectively, and the following parts of SGRP's 2017 Proxy Statement: (i) SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT, (ii) CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, (iii) EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, DIRECTORS AND OTHER INFORMATION and (iv) EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, EQUITY AWARDS AND OPTIONS. The Company's results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of its operating results for the entire year.

In connection with the preparation of the ~~Company’s~~Company's consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company identified an error in the recognition of accumulated other comprehensive loss both in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of equity and the comprehensive loss portion of the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive loss. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 99, Materiality, and SAB No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, the Company evaluated the error and determined that the related impact was not material to the results of operations or financial position for any prior annual or interim period. The correction of this error required reclassification of $1.6 million between comprehensive loss attributable to the Company and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest for the year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, the Company corrected the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of income and comprehensive loss as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and will correct these errors for all prior periods presented by revising the appropriate consolidated financial statements. The impact to the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016, and December 31, 2016, and the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive loss for ~~the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,~~ the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, and the year ended December 31, 2016, is as follows:

~~6. Related-Party Transactions~~ See Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies: Legal Mattersand Potential Adverse Effects of the SBS Litigation, below.

6.	Related-Party Transactions

~~SGRP's~~

SGRP's policy respecting approval of transactions with related persons, promoters and control persons is contained in the SPAR Group Code of Ethical Conduct for its Directors, Senior Executives and Employees Amended and Restated (as of) August 13, 2015 (the "Ethics Code"). The Ethics Code is intended to promote and reward honest, ethical, respectful and professional conduct by each Covered Person (as defined in the Ethics Code in his or her position with the Company anywhere in the world, including (among other things) serving each customer, dealing with each vendor and treating each other with integrity and respect, and behaving honestly, ethically and professionally with each customer, each vendor, each other and the Company. Article II of the Ethics Code specifically prohibits various forms of self-dealing and collusion and Article V of the Ethics Code generally prohibits each "Covered Person" (including SGRP's officers and directors) from engaging in any business activity that conflicts with his or her duties to the Company, and directs each "Covered Person" to avoid any activity or interest that is inconsistent with the best interests of the SPAR Group, in each case except for any "Approved Activity" (as such terms are defined in the Ethics Code). Examples of violations include (among other things) having any ownership interest in, acting as a director or officer of or otherwise personally benefiting from business with any competitor, customer or vendor of the Company other than pursuant to any Approved Activity. Approved Activities include (among other things) any contract with an affiliated person (each an "Approved Affiliate Contract") or anything else disclosed to and approved by SGRP's Board of Directors (the "Board"), its Governance Committee or its Audit Committee, as the case may be, as well as the ownership, board, executive and other positions held in and services and other contributions to affiliates of SGRP and its subsidiaries by certain directors, officers or employees of SGRP, any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective family members. The Company's senior management is generally responsible for monitoring compliance with the Ethics Code and establishing and maintaining compliance systems, including those related to the oversight and approval of conflicting relationships and transactions, subject to the review and oversight of SGRP's Governance Committee as provided in clause IV.11 of the Governance Committee's Charter, and SGRP's Audit Committee as provided in clause I.2(l) of the Audit Committee's Charter. The Governance Committee and Audit Committee each consist solely of independent outside directors.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

~~SGRP's~~SGRP's Audit Committee has the specific duty and responsibility to review and approve the overall fairness of all material related-party transactions. The Audit Committee receives affiliate contracts and amendments thereto for its review and approval (to the extent approval is given), and these contracts are periodically (often annually) again reviewed, in accordance with the Audit Committee Charter, the Ethics Code, the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. ("Nasdaq"), and other applicable law to ensure that the overall economic and other terms will be (or continue to be) no less favorable to the Company than would be the case in an arms-length contract with an unrelated provider of similar services (i.e., its overall fairness to the Company including pricing and the ability to provide services at comparable performance levels). The Audit Committee periodically reviews all related party relationships and transactions described below.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

In addition, in order to (among other things) assist the Board and the Audit Committee in connection with an overall review of the ~~Company’s~~Company's related party transactions and certain worker classification-related litigation matters, in April 2017 the Board formed a special subcommittee of the Audit Committee (the "Special Subcommittee") to (among other things) review the structure, documentation, fairness, conflicts, fidelity, appropriateness, and practices respecting each of the relationships and transactions discussed in this Note 6 (including those described in this Note underDomestic Related Party Services, below). The Special Subcommittee commenced that review in the first quarter of 2017 with the assistance of special auditors and counsel and is currently reviewing the preliminary results of such review, including the feedback received from its special auditors and counsel. The Company is currently unable to predict the remaining duration and final results of this review by the Special Subcommittee. See Note 9 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements –Commitments and Contingencies –Legal Matters, below.

Domestic Related Party Services:

SPAR Business Services, Inc. ("SBS"), SPAR Administrative Services, Inc. ("SAS"), and SPAR InfoTech, Inc. ("SIT"), are affiliates of SGRP but are not under the control or part of the consolidated Company. Mr. Robert G. Brown, a Director, Chairman and a major stockholder of SGRP, and Mr. William H. Bartels, a Director, Vice Chairman and a major stockholder of SGRP, are the sole stockholders of SBS. Mr. Brown is the sole stockholder of SIT. Mr. Brown is a director and officer of SBS and SIT. Mr. Bartels is a director and officer of SAS. The stockholders of SAS were Mr. Bartels and ~~previously Mr. Brown, and as of January 1, 2015, Mr. Brown transferred all of his ownership to~~ parties related to Mr. Brown, each of whom is considered an affiliate of the Company for related party purposes because of their family relationships with Mr. Brown.

The Company executes the services it provides to its domestic clients primarily through independent field merchandising, auditing, assembly and other field personnel (each a "Field Specialist"), substantially all of whom are provided by SBS, and ~~administers~~administers those services through local and regional administrators, substantially all of whom are provided by SAS. The Company paid ~~$12.8~~$19.6 million and ~~$10.3~~$15.8 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, to SBS for its provision as needed of approximately ~~5,230~~6,400 of SBS's available Field Specialists in the U.S.A. (which amounted to approximately ~~81%~~75% and ~~80%~~78% of the Company's total domestic Field Specialist expense for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively). The Company paid ~~$2.1~~$3.2 and $3.1 million for ~~both~~ the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, to SAS for its provision of its 5660 and 5061 full-time regional, district and ~~district~~office administrators as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively (which amounted to approximately 90% and 92% of the Company's total domestic field administrative service cost for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and ~~2016)~~2016, respectively). In addition to these field service and administration expenses, SAS also incurs other administrative expenses related to benefit and employment tax expenses of SAS and payroll processing, legal and other administrative expenses and SBS incurs expenses for processing vendor payments, legal defense and other administrative expenses (but those expenses are only reimbursed by SGRP to the extent approved by the Company as described below). The total cost recorded by the Company for the expenses of SBS and SAS in providing their services to the Company, including the "Cost Plus Fee" arrangement (as defined and discussed below) and other expenses paid directly by the Company on behalf of and invoiced to SBS and SAS, was ~~$14.9~~$22.8 and ~~$12.5~~$19.0 million, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

The terms of the Amended and Restated Field Service Agreement with SBS dated as of January 1, 2004, as amended in 2011, and the Amended and Restated Field Management Agreement with SAS dated as of January 1, 2004 (each a "Prior Agreement"), defined reimbursable expenses and established a "Cost Plus Fee" arrangement where the Company paid SBS and SAS for their costs of providing those services plus a fixed percentage of such reimbursable expenses (the "Cost Plus Fee"). The parties have had negotiations respecting replacement agreements since the Prior Agreements expired on November 30, 2014. As further described below, a new Field Administration Agreement was entered into with SAS in 2016.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

The Company and SBS have agreed in principle to a revised Cost Plus Fee arrangement equal to 2.96% of the Field Specialists and certain other approved reimbursable expenses incurred by SBS in performing services for the Company, subject to certain offsetting credits. This agreement in principle went into effect on and has applied since December 1, 2014. A new SBS agreement is being prepared, which will be subject to contractual terms and provisions acceptable to the parties, but the documentation is proceeding slowly because the parties have failed (among other things) to agree on the descriptions and extent of the approval processes for reimbursable expenses.

No SBS compensation to any officer, director or other related party has been reimbursed or approved to date by the Company, and no such compensation reimbursements were made or approved under SBS's Prior Agreement. This is not a restriction on SBS since SBS is not controlled by the Company and may pay any compensation to any person that SBS desires out of its own funds. However, SBS has ~~attempted to invoice~~invoiced the Company monthly for certain such compensation payments from July of 2015 through December 2016, and again from July 2017 to September 30, 2017, but the Company has rejected those invoices as non-reimbursable expenses. Since SBS is a "Subchapter S" corporation, all income from SBS is allocated to its stockholders (see above).

The Company has determined that the rates charged by SBS for the services of its field merchandising, auditing, assembly and other field personnel (each a "Field Specialist") are favorable to the Company when compared to other possible non-affiliate providers. SBS has advised the Company that those favorable rates are dependent (at least in part) on ~~SBS's~~SBS's ability to continue to use independent contractors as its Field Specialists, that such Field Specialists generally provide greater flexibility and performance quality at lower total costs as a result of their business independence and initiative, and that it has an agreement with each Field Specialist clearly confirming his, her, or its status as an independent contractor.

The appropriateness of ~~SBS's~~SBS's treatment of its Field Specialists as independent contractors has been periodically subject to legal challenge (both currently and historically) by various states and others, SBS's expenses of defending those challenges and other proceedings have historically been reimbursed by the Company under SBS's Prior Agreement, and SBS's expenses of defending those challenges and other proceedings were reimbursed by the Company for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in the amounts of ~~$179,000~~$218,000 and ~~$443,000,~~$587,000, respectively), after determination (on a case by case basis) that those defense expenses were costs of providing services to the Company. The Company has advised SBS that, since there is no currently effective comprehensive written services agreement with SBS, the Company will continue to review and decide each request by SBS for reimbursement of its legal defense expenses (including appeals) on a case-by-case basis in its discretion, including the relative costs and benefits to the Company. The Company has not agreed, and does not currently intend, to reimburse SBS for any judgment or similar amount (including any damages, settlement, or related tax, penalty, or ~~interest~~interest) in any legal challenge or other proceeding against or involving SBS, and the Company does not believe it has ever done so (other than in insignificant nuisance amounts). However, there ~~are~~can be no ~~assurances~~assurance that SBS will be able to satisfy any such judgment or similar amount resulting from any adverse legal determination, that SBS or someone else will not claim, or that SBS will be able to successfully defend any claim, that the Company is liable (through reimbursement, indemnification or otherwise) for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that SBS will succeed in defending any such legal challenge, the legal expenses of prolonged litigation and appeals could continue to be (and have from time to time been) significant, and prolonged litigation and appeals and any adverse determination in any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on SBS's ability to provide services needed by the Company and the Company's costs of doing business.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

Current material and potentially material proceedings against SBS and, in one instance, the Company are described in Note 9 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements –Commitments and Contingencies –Legal Matters, below. These descriptions are based on an independent review by the Company and do not reflect the views of SBS, its management or its counsel.

Any prolonged continuation of or material increase in the legal defense costs of SBS (and thus the reimbursable expenses SBS may charge to and that may be paid by the ~~Company)~~Company to the extent reimbursement is approved by the Company in its discretion), the failure of SBS to satisfy any such judgment or similar amount resulting from any adverse legal determination against SBS, any claim by SBS, SAS, any other related party or any third party that the Company is somehow liable for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS or SAS or any other related party, any judicial determination that the Company is somehow liable for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS or SAS or any other related party (in whole or in part), any decrease in SBS's or ~~SAS’s~~SAS's performance (quality or otherwise), any inability by SBS or SAS to execute the services for the Company, or any increase in the Company's use of employees (rather than independent contractors) as its domestic Field Specialists, in each case in whole or in part, could have a material adverse effect on the Company or its performance or condition (including its assets, business, clients, capital, cash flow, credit, expenses, financial condition, income, liabilities, liquidity, locations, marketing, operations, prospects, sales, strategies, taxation or other achievement, results or condition), whether actual or as planned, intended, anticipated, estimated or otherwise expected.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

On June 14, 2016, SAS and ~~SMF~~SPAR Marketing Force, Inc. ("SMF") entered into a new Field Administration Agreement (the "SAS Agreement"). In order to provide continuity with SAS's Prior Agreement, the SAS Agreement is effective and governs the relationship of the parties as of December 1, 2014, and amends, restates and completely replaces SAS's Prior Agreement. The SAS Agreement more clearly defines reimbursable and excluded expenses and the budget and approval procedures and continues the indemnifications and releases provided by SAS's Prior Agreement (which indemnifications and releases were and are comparable to those applicable to SGRP's directors and executive officers under its By-Laws and applicable law). Specifically, the SAS Agreement reduced the Cost Plus Fee from 4% to 2% effective as of June 1, 2016.

~~SGRP's~~SGRP's Audit Committee has approved the SAS Agreement pursuant to its specific duty and responsibility to review and approve the overall fairness of all material related-party transactions, as more fully provided above in this Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

No ~~unbudgeted~~ SAS compensation to any officer, director or other related party(other than Mr. Peter W. Brown pursuant to previously approved budgets) has been reimbursed or approved to date by the Company, and no such compensation reimbursements were made or approved under SAS's Prior Agreement. This is not a restriction on SAS since SAS is not controlled by the Company and may pay any compensation to any person that SAS desires out of its own funds. Since SAS is a "Subchapter S" corporation, all income from SAS is allocated to its stockholders (see above). Peter W. Brown ("Peter Brown") is an employee of SAS, is the nephew of SGRP's Chairman, Mr. Robert G. Brown, an officer and employee of the Company's affiliate, SIT (which is owned by Mr. Robert G. Brown), and is a director of SPAR BSMT and owns EILLC (see International Related Party Services, below). Peter Brown was an official observer at the meetings of SGRP's Board from 2014 through December 2016. Accordingly, Peter Brown is a related party in respect of the Company.

National Merchandising Services, LLC ("NMS"), is a consolidated domestic subsidiary of the Company and is owned jointly by SGRP through its indirect ownership of 51% of the NMS membership interests and by National Merchandising of America, Inc. ("NMA"), through its ownership of the other 49% of the NMS membership interests. Mr. Edward Burdekin is the Chief Executive Officer and President and a director of NMS and also is an executive officer and director of NMA. Ms. Andrea Burdekin, Mr. ~~Burdekin's~~Burdekin's wife, is the sole stockholder and a director of NMA and a director of NMS. NMA is an affiliate of the Company but is not consolidated with the Company.

International Related Party Services:

SGRP Meridian (Pty), Ltd. ("Meridian") is a consolidated international subsidiary of the Company and is owned 51% by SGRP and 49% by the following individuals: Mr. Brian Mason, Mr. Garry Bristow, and Mr. Adrian Wingfield. Mr. Mason is President and a director and Mr. Bristow is an officer and director of Meridian. Mr. Mason is also an officer and director and 50% shareholder of Merhold Property Trust ("MPT"). Mr. Mason and Mr. Bristow are both officers and directors and both own 50% of Merhold Cape Property Trust ("MCPT"). Mr. Mason, Mr. Bristow and Mr. Wingfield are all officers and own 46.7%, 20% and 33.3%, respectively of Merhold Holding Trust ("MHT"), which provides services similar to those provided by MPT. MPT owns the building where Meridian is headquartered and ~~also owns 2 vehicles both of which are~~is subleased to Meridian. MCPT provides a fleet of ~~126~~approximately 160 vehicles to Meridian under a 4 year lease program. These leases are provided to Meridian at local market rates included in the summary table below.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

SPAR Todopromo is a consolidated international subsidiary of the Company and is owned 51% by SGRP and 49% by the following individuals: Mr. Juan F. Medina Domenzain, Juan Medina Staines, Julia Cesar Hernandez Vanegas, and Jorge Medina Staines. Mr. Juan F. Medina Domenzain is an officer and director of SPAR Todopromo and is also majority shareholder (90%) of CONAPAD ("CON"), which supplied administrative and operational consulting support to SPAR Todopromo for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

In August 2016, Mr. Juan F. Medina Domenzain ("JFMD"), partner in SPAR Todopromo, purchased the warehouse that was being leased by SPAR Todopromo. A new lease expiring December 31, 2017, was entered into with SPAR Todopromo with the same terms and cost as with the previous owner.

On September 8, 2016, the Company (through one of its subsidiaries, SPAR International Ltd.) acquired 100% ownership of SGRP Brasil Participações Ltda. ("SGRP Holdings"), a Brazilian limitada (which is a form of limited liability company), from its affiliate, SIT, at cost (including approved expenses). ~~See~~~~Related Party Transactions and Arrangements in the Brazil Acquisition~~ ~~in this Note, below.~~ SGRP Holdings then completed the formation and acquired a majority of the stock of SPAR Brasil Serviços de Merchandising e Tecnologia S.A., a Brazilian corporation ("SPAR BSMT"). SGRP Holdings and SPAR BSMT are consolidated subsidiaries of the Company. SPAR BSMT is owned 51% by the Company, 39% by JK Consultoria Empresarial Ltda.-ME, a Brazilian limitada ("JKC"), and 10% by Earth Investments, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company ("EILLC").

JKC is owned by Mr. Jonathan Dagues Martins, a Brazilian citizen and resident ("JDM") and his sister, Ms. Karla Dagues Martins, a Brazilian citizen and resident. JDM is the Chief Executive Officer and President of each SPAR Brazil company pursuant to a Management Agreement between JDM and SPAR BSMT dated September 13, 2016. JDM also is a director of SPAR BSMT. ~~Accordingly,~~Accordingly, JKC and JDM are each a related party in respect of the Company. EILLC is owned by, ~~Mr.~~ Peter W. Brown who is a citizen and resident of the USA ~~("PWB"). PWB is an officer~~ and employee of the Company's affiliate, SIT, which is owned by SGRP's Chairman, Mr. Robert G. Brown, and is also an employee of the Company’s affiliate, SAS. PWB was an official observer at the meetings of SGRP's Board from 2014 through December 2016, and PWB also is the nephew of Mr. Robert G. Brown. PWB also is a director of SPAR BSMT. Accordingly, PWB and EILLC are each a related party in respect of the Company (SeeDomestic Related Party Services, above). Accordingly, EILLC also is a related party in respect of the Company.

SPAR BSMT has contracted with Ms. Karla Dagues Martins, a Brazilian citizen and resident and ~~JDM's~~JDM's sister to handle the labor litigation cases for SPAR BSMT and its subsidiaries. These legal services are being provided to them at local market rates by Ms. Martins's company, Karla Martins Sociedade de Advogados ("KMSA").

The NM Acquisition (as defined below in Note 11 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statement -Purchase of Interest in Subsi~~diaries~~diaries) and associated related party transactions were reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee of SGRP's Board of Directors.

The Company believes it is the largest and most important customer of SBS, SAS, NRS, MPT, MCPT, MHT, CON, JFMD and KMSA (and from time to time may be each entity's only customer), and accordingly the Company generally has been able to negotiate better terms, receives more personal and responsive service and is more likely to receive credits and other financial accommodations from SBS, SAS, NRS, MPT, MCPT, MHT, CON, JFMD and KMSA than the Company could reasonably expect to receive from an unrelated service provider who has significant other customers and business. SBS, SAS and other material affiliate contracts and arrangements are annually reviewed and considered for approval by SGRP's Audit Committee, subject to the ongoing negotiations with SBS as described above.

Summary of Related Party Services:

The following costs of affiliates were charged to the Company (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Services provided by affiliates:
Field merchandiser and other expenses (SBS)	$	6,788	$	5,491	$	19,593	$	15,828
Field administration and other expenses (SAS)		1,044		1,011		3,178		3,138
Office and vehicle rental expenses (MPT)		30		8		46		32
Vehicle rental expenses (MCPT)		579		245		870		618
Office and vehicle rental expenses (MHT)		85		34		126		85
Field merchandiser expenses (NDS Reklam)		–		1		–		1
Consulting and administrative services (CON)		61		74		181		241
Legal Services (KMSA)		31		–		79		–
Warehousing rental (JFMD)		13		3		38		3

Total services provided by affiliates	$	8,631	$	6,867	$	24,111	$	19,946

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

~~Summary of Related Party Services:~~

~~The following costs of affiliates were charged to the Company (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Services provided by affiliates:

Field merchandiser and other expenses (SBS)
$ 6,929 $ 5,390 $ 12,805 $ 10,337
Field administration and other expenses (SAS)
1,055 989 2,129 2,127
Office and vehicle rental expenses (MPT)
16 12 32 24
Vehicle rental expenses (MCPT)
296 194 600 373
Office and vehicle rental expenses (MHT)
42 26 83 51
Consulting and administrative services (CON)
57 83 153 167
Legal Services (KMSA)
23 – 46 –
Warehousing rental (JFMD)
12 – 23 –

Total services provided by affiliates
$ 8,430 $ 6,694 $ 15,871 $ 13,079

~~Due to affiliates consists of the following (in thousands):~~

Due to affiliates consists of the following (in thousands):					September 30,		December 31,
	June 30,		December 31,		2017		2016
	2017		2016
Loans from local investors:(1)
Loans from local investors:(1)
Australia	$	246	$	231	$	250	$	231
Mexico		1,001		1,001		1,001		1,001
Brazil		139		139		139		139
China		303		761		720		761
South Africa						15		–
NMS LLC		–		348		–		348
Accrued Expenses due to affiliates:
SBS/SAS		895		869		1,883		869
Total due to affiliates	$	2,584	$	3,349	$	4,008	$	3,349

(1) Represent loans from the local investors into the Company's subsidiaries (representing their proportionate share of working capital loans). The loans have no payment terms and are due on demand and as such have been classified as current liabilities in the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Other Related Party Transactions and Arrangements

In July 1999, ~~SPAR Marketing Force, Inc. ("SMF"),~~SMF, SBS and SIT entered into a perpetual software ownership agreement providing that each party independently owned an undivided share of and had the right to unilaterally license and exploit their "Business Manager" Internet job scheduling software (which had been jointly developed by such parties), and all related improvements, revisions, developments and documentation from time to time voluntarily made or procured by any of them at its own expense. Business Manager and its other proprietary software and applications are used by the Company for (among other things) the scheduling, tracking, coordination and reporting of its merchandising and marketing services and are accessible via the Internet or other applicable telecommunication network by the authorized representatives of the Company and its clients through their respective computers and mobile devices. In addition, SPAR Trademarks, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of SGRP ("STM"), SBS and SIT entered into separate perpetual trademark licensing agreements whereby STM has granted non-exclusive royalty-free licenses to SIT and SBS (and through them to their commonly controlled subsidiaries and affiliates by sublicenses, including SAS) for their continued use of the name "SPAR" and certain other trademarks and related rights of STM. SBS and SAS provide services to the Company, as described above, SIT assisted in the Brazilian acquisition at a cost to the Company of $49,000, as described below, and SIT no longer provides services to and does not compete with the Company.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

Through arrangements with the Company, SBS, SAS and other companies owned by Mr. Brown or Mr. Bartels participate in various benefit plans, insurance policies and similar group purchases by the Company, for which the Company charges them their allocable shares of the costs of those group items and the actual costs of all items paid specifically for them. All such transactions between the Company and the above affiliates are paid and/or collected by the Company in the normal course of business.

In addition to the above, SAS purchases insurance coverage for worker compensation, casualty and property insurance risk for itself, for SBS for its Field Specialists that require such insurance coverage, and for the Company from Affinity Insurance, Ltd. ("Affinity"). SAS owns a minority (less than 1%) of the common stock in Affinity. The Affinity insurance premiums for such coverage are ultimately charged to SAS, ~~(and through SAS to the Company), SBS (and through SBS to its covered Field Specialists) and~~which then charges the Company and SBS for their fair share of the insurance cost based on ~~the contractual~~informal arrangements ofbetween the parties.

~~9. Commitments and Contingencies~~$24,000.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

9.	Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

The Company is a party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of ~~Company's~~Company's management, disposition of these matters are not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on the Company or its assets, business, clients, capital, cash flow, credit, expenses, financial condition, income, liabilities, liquidity, locations, marketing, operations, prospects, sales, strategies, taxation or other achievement, results or condition.

The Company executes the services it provides to its domestic clients primarily through independent field merchandising, auditing, assembly and other field personnel (each a "Field Specialist"), almost all of whom are engaged and provided as independent contractors by SBS. For contractual details and payment amounts, see Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements –Related Party Transactions –Domestic Related Party Services, above.

The appropriateness of ~~SBS's~~SBS's treatment of its Field Specialists as independent contractors has been periodically subject to legal challenge (both currently and historically) by various states and others, SBS's expenses of defending those challenges and other proceedings have historically been reimbursed by the Company under SBS's Prior Agreement, and SBS's expenses of defending those challenges and other proceedings were reimbursed by the Company during the three month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in the amounts of ~~$93,000~~$39,000 and ~~$89,000,~~$144,000, respectively), and the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in the amounts of ~~$179,000~~$218,000 and ~~$443,000,~~$587,000, respectively), after determination (on a case by case basis) that those defense expenses were costs of providing services to the Company. The Company has advised SBS that, since there is no currently effective comprehensive written services agreement with SBS, the Company will continue to review and decide each request by SBS for reimbursement of its legal defense expenses (including appeals) on a case-by-case basis in its discretion, including the relative costs and benefits to the Company. The Company has not agreed, and does not currently intend, to reimburse SBS for any judgment or similar amount (including any damages, settlement, or related tax, penalty, or ~~interest~~interest) in any legal challenge or other proceeding against or involving SBS, and the Company does not believe it has ever done so (other than in insignificant nuisance amounts). However, there ~~are~~can be no ~~assurances~~assurance that SBS will be able to satisfy any such judgment or similar amount resulting from any adverse legal determination, that SBS or someone else will not claim, or that SBS will be able to successfully defend any claim, that the Company is liable (through reimbursement, indemnification or otherwise) for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that SBS will succeed in defending any such legal challenge, the legal expenses of prolonged litigation and appeals could continue to be (and have from time to time been) significant, and prolonged litigation and appeals and any adverse determination in any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on SBS's ability to provide services needed by the Company and the Company's costs of doing business.

Current material and potentially material proceedings against SBS and, in one instance, the Company are described below. These descriptions are based on an independent review by the Company and do not reflect the views of SBS, its management or its counsel.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

SBS Clothier Litigation

Melissa Clothier was engaged by SBS (then known as SPAR Marketing Services, Inc.) and provided services pursuant to the terms of an "Independent Merchandiser Agreement" acknowledging her engagement as an independent contractor. On June 30, 2014, Ms. Clothier filed suit against SBS and the Company styled Case No. RG12 639317, in the Superior Court in Alameda County, California, in which Ms. Clothier asserted claims on behalf of herself and a putative class of similarly situated merchandisers in California who are or were classified as independent contractors at any time between July 16, 2008, and June 30, 2014. Ms. Clothier alleged that she and other class members were misclassified as independent contractors and that, as a result of this misclassification, the defendants improperly underpaid them in violation of various California minimum wage and overtime laws. The Company was subsequently dismissed from the action without prejudice. The court ordered that the case be heard in two phases. Phase one was limited to the determination of whether members of the class were misclassified as independent contractors. After hearing evidence, receiving post-trial briefings and considering the issues, the Court issued its Statement of Decision on September 9, 2016, finding that the class members had been misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees. The parties have now moved into phase two to determine damages (if any)~~. No trial date for phase two has been set and the parties are currently engaged in~~, which included discovery as to the measure of damages in ~~this~~the case. Trial on phase two was scheduled for September 11, 2017, but was postponed. The Court has scheduled a case management conference for December 19, 2017, to establish a new trial date for phase two. SBS has advised the Company that SBS ~~will~~could appeal the adverse phase one determination when permitted under the court's rules.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

SBS Rodgers Litigation

Maceo Rodgers was engaged by and provided services to SBS pursuant to the terms of his "Master Agreements" with SBS acknowledging his engagement as an independent contractor. On February 21, 2014, Rodgers filed suit against SBS, Robert G. Brown and William H. Bartels, styled Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-00055, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Galveston Division). Plaintiff asserted claims on behalf of himself and an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who provided services to SBS as independent contractors at any time on or after July 15, 2012, claiming they all were misclassified as independent contractors and that, as a result of this misclassification, the Defendants improperly underpaid them in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime and minimum wage provisions. Although the Court conditionally certified the class on December 8, 2015, only 61 individuals joined the action as opt-in plaintiffs, and all but 11 of them have potentially disqualifying arbitration provisions, residences outside the class's geographic area, or late opt-in filings, and ~~are being~~were challenged by the Defendants in various ~~pending~~ motions, including a motion to decertify the class. The Court, however, did not rule on these motions and instead stayed the case on September 19, 2017 to allow the parties to mediate. On October 24, 2017, the Court granted the parties' joint motion to extend the stay order until January 31, 2018.

SBS and SGRP Hogan Litigation

Paradise Hogan was engaged by and provided services to SBS as an independent contractor pursuant to the terms of an "Independent Contractor Master Agreement" with SBS acknowledging his engagement as an independent contractor. On January 6, 2017, Hogan filed suit against SBS and ~~SPAR Group, Inc. ("SGRP" and~~SGRP (and part of the Company), styled Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-10024-LTS, in the U.S. District Court for District of Massachusetts. Hogan initially asserted claims on behalf of himself and an alleged nationwide class of similarly situated individuals who provided services to SBS and SGRP as independent contractors. Hogan alleged that he and other alleged class members were misclassified as independent contractors, and as a result of this purported misclassification, Hogan asserted claims on behalf of himself and the alleged Massachusetts class members under the Massachusetts Wage Act and Minimum Wage Law for failure to pay overtime and minimum wages, as well as state law claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, Hogan asserted claims on behalf of himself and the nationwide class for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime and minimum wage provisions. On March 28, 2017, the Company moved to refer Hogan's claim to arbitration pursuant to his agreement, to dismiss or stay Hogan's case pending arbitration, and to dismiss Hogan's case for failure to state a specific claim upon which relief could be granted. ~~Plaintiff’s~~Plaintiff's counsel subsequently notified ~~SGRP’s~~SGRP's attorney of their intent to amend their Complaint without prejudice. The Amended Complaint, which was filed on May 2, 2017, eliminated all of ~~Plaintiff’s~~Plaintiff's claims except for a single claim against SGRP for failure to pay Hogan and a similarly situated class of Massachusetts independent contractors all wages under the Massachusetts Wage Act and a separate, but identical claim against SBS. The result of the amendment significantly narrowed the scope of the litigation and eliminated the original nationwide Fair Labor Standards Act claims. The Company was granted leave to refile their motion to compel arbitration to dismiss ~~Hogan’s~~Hogan's case pending arbitration, and to dismiss ~~Hogan’s~~Hogan's case for failure to state a specific claim upon which relief could be granted. The ~~Company’s~~Company's motion was filed on June 7, 2017, ~~Plaintiff’s~~Plaintiff's opposition to the ~~Company’s~~Company's motion was filed on June 21, 2017 and the Company thereafter filed a reply brief in support of its motion on June 30, 2017. The parties currently await a hearing date on the ~~Company’s~~Company's motion.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

Potential Adverse Effects of the SBS Litigation

Any prolonged continuation of or material increase in the legal defense costs of SBS (and thus the reimbursable expenses SBS may charge to and that may be paid by the ~~Company)~~Companyto the extent reimbursement is approved by the Company in its discretion), the failure of SBS to satisfy anysuchjudgment or similar amount, any claim by SBS, any other related party or any third party that the Company is somehow liable for any judgment or similar amount (including any damages, settlement, or related tax, penalty, or interest) in any legal challenge or other proceeding imposed against or involving SBS or other related party, any judicial determination that the Company is somehow liable for any such judgment or similar amount imposedagainst SBS or other related party (in whole or in part), any decrease in SBS's performance (quality or otherwise), any inability by SBS to execute the services for the Company, or any increase in the Company's use of employees (rather than independent contractors) as its domestic Field Specialists, in each case in whole or in part, could have a material adverse effect on the Company or its performance or condition (including its assets, business, clients, capital, cash flow, credit, expenses, financial condition, income, liabilities, liquidity, locations, marketing, operations, prospects, sales, strategies, taxation or other achievement, results or condition), whether actual or as planned, intended, anticipated, estimated or otherwise expected. See Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements –Related Party Transactions –Domestic Related Party Services, above.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

10~~10.~~. Segment Information

The Company reports net revenues from operating income by reportable segment. Reportable segments are components of the Company for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The Company provides similar merchandising, business technology and marketing services throughout the world, operating within two reportable segments, its Domestic Division and its International Division. The Company uses those divisions to improve its administration and operational and strategic focuses, and it tracks and reports certain financial information separately for each of those divisions. The Company measures the performance of its Domestic and International Divisions and subsidiaries using the same metrics. The primary measurement utilized by management is operating profits, historically the key indicator of long-term growth and profitability, as the Company is focused on reinvesting the operating profits of each of its international subsidiaries back into its local markets in an effort to improve market share and continued expansion efforts.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(unaudited) (continued)~~

The accounting policies of each of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Management evaluates performance as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenue:
United States	$	13,685		$	11,184		$	25,006		$	20,936		$	15,062		$	11,332		$	40,069		$	32,268
International		29,037			18,548			57,602			35,407			33,690			22,106			91,292			57,513
Total revenue	$	42,722		$	29,732		$	82,608		$	56,343		$	48,752		$	33,438		$	131,361		$	89,781

Operating income:
Operating income (loss):
United States	$	292		$	362		$	357		$	64		$	343		$	(184	)	$	701		$	(120	)
International		679			418			1,098			883			485			614			1,583			1,496
Total operating income	$	971		$	780		$	1,455		$	947		$	828		$	430		$	2,284		$	1,376

Interest expense:
Interest expense (income):
United States	$	52		$	27		$	102		$	52		$	56		$	36		$	158		$	88
International		2			4			(95	)		8			54			15			(41	)		23
Total interest expense	$	54		$	31		$	7		$	60		$	110		$	51		$	117		$	111

Other (income), net:

United States	$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
International		(135	)		(80	)		(197	)		(105	)		(78	)		(78	)		(275	)		(183	)
Total other (income), net	$	(135	)	$	(80	)	$	(197	)	$	(105	)	$	(78	)	$	(78	)	$	(275	)	$	(183	)

Income before income tax expense:
Income (loss) before income tax expense:

United States	$	240		$	335		$	255		$	12		$	287		$	(220	)	$	543		$	(208	)
International		812			494			1,390			980			509			677			1,899			1,656
Total income before income tax expense	$	1,052		$	829		$	1,645		$	992		$	796		$	457		$	2,442		$	1,448


Income tax expense:
Income tax (benefit) expense:
United States	$	31		$	123		$	(85	)	$	(88	)	$	14		$	(306	)	$	(71	)	$	(394	)
International		247			103			782			319			196			275			978			594
Total income tax expense	$	278		$	226		$	697		$	231
Total income tax (benefit) expense													$	210		$	(31	)	$	907		$	200

Net income:

United States	$	209		$	212		$	340		$	100		$	273		$	86		$	614		$	186
International		565			391			608			661			313			402			921			1,062
Total net income	$	774		$	603		$	948		$	761		$	586		$	488		$	1,535		$	1,248


Depreciation and amortization:
United States	$	340		$	336		$	679		$	679		$	339		$	334		$	1,018		$	1,014
International		194			148			360			293			148			152			508			445
Total depreciation and amortization	$	534		$	484		$	1,039		$	972		$	487		$	486		$	1,526		$	1,459

Capital expenditures:
United States	$	245		$	262		$	511		$	506		$	172		$	291		$	683		$	798
International		87			99			181			226			183			151			363			376
Total capital expenditures	$	332		$	361		$	692		$	732		$	355		$	442		$	1,046		$	1,174

~~Note: There were no inter-company sales for the six months ended June~~
Note: There were no inter-company sales for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 or 2016.

June 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

Assets:

United States
$ 22,416 $ 22,189
International
33,246 32,662
Total assets
$ 55,662 $ 54,851

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Assets:
United States	$	21,804	$	22,189
International		36,754		32,662
Total assets	$	58,558	$	54,851

Geographic Data (in thousands)

	Three Months EndedJune 30,										Six Months EndedJune 30,										Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017					2016					2017					2016					2017					2016					2017					2016
International revenue:			% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue					% of consolidated net revenue
Brazil	$	8,157		19.1	%	$	–		–	%	$	18,100		21.9	%	$	–		–	%	$	11,132		22.8	%	$	1,850		5.5	%	$	29,232		22.3	%	$	1,850		2.1	%
South Africa		6,916		16.2			4,721		15.9			12,943		15.7			8,935		15.9			6,703		13.7			5,936		17.8			19,646		15.0			14,871		16.6
Mexico		5,374		12.6			5,106		17.2			10,062		12.2			10,105		17.9			6,115		12.5			5,495		16.4			16,177		12.3			15,600		17.4
China		2,120		5.0			2,882		9.7			4,528		5.5			5,617		10.0			2,868		5.9			3,029		9.1			7,396		5.6			8,646		9.6
Japan																						2,426		5.0			1,799		5.4			5,970		4.5			5,157		5.7
India		1,838		4.3			1,376		4.6			3,450		4.2			2,680		4.8			1,947		4.0			1,523		4.6			5,397		4.1			4,203		4.7
Japan		1,835		4.3			1,765		5.9			3,544		4.3			3,358		6.0
Canada		1,742		4.1			1,871		6.3			3,045		3.7			3,129		5.6			1,499		3.1			1,453		4.3			4,544		3.5			4,582		5.1
Australia		996		2.3			755		2.5			1,806		2.2			1,414		2.5			935		1.9			945		2.8			2,741		2.1			2,359		2.6
Turkey		59		0.1			72		0.2			124		0.2			169		0.3			65		0.1			76		0.2			189		0.1			245		0.3
Total international revenue	$	29,037		68.0	%	$	18,548		62.3	%	$	57,602		69.9	%	$	35,407		63.0	%	$	33,690		69.0	%	$	22,106		66.1	%	$	91,292		69.5	%	$	57,513		64.1	%

	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Long lived assets:
United States	$	8,061	$	8,594
International		4,382		3,965
Total long lived assets	$	12,443	$	12,559

June 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

Long lived assets:

United States
$ 8,494 $ 8,594
International
4,567 3,965
Total long lived assets
$ 13,061 $ 12,559

1~~11.~~1. Purchase of Interests in Subsidiaries

In September 2016, after acquiring SGRP Brasil Participações Ltda. ("SGRP Holdings"), a Brazilian limitada (which is a form of limited liability company), and establishing SPAR Brasil Serviços de Merchandising e Tecnologia S.A., a Brazilian corporation ("SPAR BSMT"), in a series of related party transactions (See Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements -Related Party Transactions –InternationalRelated PartyServices, above), SGRP Holdings and SPAR BSMT (the "Purchasers") entered into a Quota Purchase Agreement dated September 13, 2016 (the "NM QPA"), with Interservice Publicidade Sociedade Ltda., a Brazilian limitada, Momentum Promoções Ltda., a Brazilian limitada, and IPG Nederland B.V., a Netherlands company (collectively, the "Sellers"). The Sellers are subsidiaries of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Interpublic"), which is a global provider of advertising, media and other business services. The NM QPA provided for the acquisition by the Purchasers from the Sellers (the "NM Acquisition") of all of the equity shares (called "quotas") in New Momentum Ltda., a Brazilian limitada, and New Momentum Serviços Temporários Ltda., a Brazilian limitada (each a "NM Company" or collectively the "NM Companies"), two of Interpublic's "In Store" companies in Brazil. SPAR BSMT acquired 99% of the quotas issued by each NM Company and SGRP Holdings acquired 1% of the quotas issued by each NM Company pursuant to the NM QPA. The closing of the acquisition of the NM Companies was completed with the disbursement of the purchase price to the Sellers on September 19, 2016, effective as of close of business on September 13, 2016. The purchase price for the NM Companies was R$1,312,000 (approximately US$401,000). The Company has since changed the names of the NM Companies to SPAR Brasil Serviços LTDA. and SPAR Brasil Serviços Temporários LTDA.

Momentum Promoções Ltda., one of the Sellers, also agreed to provide certain transition services and continued use of certain existing office space to SPAR BSMT and each of the NM Companies (collectively, "SPAR Brazil"), pursuant to a Transition Services Agreement dated September 13, 2016 (the "Transition Agreement"), and a Sublease Agreement dated September 13, 2016 (the "Sublease"), respectively. The Sublease has an initial term of 12 months and requires monthly rent and back office support payments of R$205,417 (approximately ~~$65,700~~$65,000 USD). After December 31, 2016, the Transition Agreement relating to Accounting Service, terminated on April 30, 2017, and for IT service, ~~terminates~~terminated on September 13, 2017.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

The Company has completed its preliminary calculation of the fair value and related allocation of assets between goodwill and other. The amounts listed below reflect the results of our preliminary assessment and may be updated should additional information become available related to this acquisition. A summary of assets acquired, goodwill and liabilities assumed and net of purchase price are as follows (in thousands):

Cash	$	484
Net Working Capital, net of cash		(155	)
Fixed Assets		22
Intangible Assets		336
Goodwill		133
Assumed Liabilities		(419	)
Net Fair Value of Assets Acquired	$	401

Cash
$ 484
Net Working Capital, net of cash
(155
)
Fixed Assets
22
Intangible Assets
336
Goodwill
133
Assumed Liabilities
(419
)
Net Fair Value of Assets Acquired
$ 401

~~For the six month period ended June 30, 2017, the Company reported revenue of $19.7 million~~SPAR Group, Inc. and ~~a net income of $46,000 related~~Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~this acquisition.~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

The following table contains unaudited pro forma revenue and net income for SPAR Group, Inc. assuming SPAR Brasil closed on January 1, 2016 (in thousands):

Revenue Net Loss
Consolidated supplemental pro forma for the six month period ended June 30, 2016
$ 71,862 $ (10 )

		Revenue				Net (Loss)
Consolidated supplemental pro forma for the nine month period ended September 30, 2016		$	113,783			$	(194	)

The pro forma in the table above includes adjustments for, amortization of intangible assets and acquisition costs to reflect results that are more representative of the results of the transactions as if the SPAR Brasil acquisition closed on January 1, 2016. This pro forma information utilizes certain estimates, is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results of operation that would have actually occurred. In addition, future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in the pro forma information. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect the impact of future events that may occur after the acquisition, such as anticipated cost savings from operating synergies.

1~~12.~~2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

New Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, clarifies Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, such that an entity must apply modification accounting to changes in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award unless all of the following criteria are met: (1) the fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. The ASU indicates that if the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique used to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification; (2) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the modification; and (3) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the modification. The ASU is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2017-04 (ASU 2017-04), Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. With ASU 2017-04, an entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, an entity will compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting ~~unit's~~unit's fair value. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will have on ~~our~~its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is required to be applied prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017. The impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements will depend on the facts and circumstances of any specific future transactions.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

ASU 2016-17, Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control, amends the variable interest entity (VIE) guidance within Topic 810, Consolidation. It does not change the two required characteristics for a single decision maker to be the primary beneficiary ("power" and "economics"), but it revises one aspect of the related analysis. The amendments change how a single decision maker of a VIE treats indirect variable interests held through related parties that are under common control when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The ASU requires consideration of such indirect interests on a proportionate basis, instead of being the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety, thereby making consolidation less likely. ASU 2016-17 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, ASU 2016-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. However, if an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of that fiscal year. Entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2015-02 are required to adopt ASU 2016-17 at the same time they adopt ASU 2015-02 and should apply the same transition method elected for ASU 2015-02. Entities that have already adopted ASU 2015-02 are required to apply ASU 2016-17 retrospectively to all relevant prior periods beginning with the fiscal year in which ASU 2015-02 initially was applied.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows ("ASU 2016-15"), which reduces diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for reporting periods after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the ~~Company's~~Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 amending how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The guidance requires the application of a current expected credit loss model, which is a new impairment model based on expected losses. Under this model, an entity recognizes an allowance for expected credit losses based on historical experience, current conditions and forecasted information rather than the current methodology of delaying recognition of credit losses until it is ~~probable~~probable a loss has been incurred. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on ~~our~~its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, ~~“Compensation—~~Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)~~” (“~~ ("ASU ~~2016-09”~~2016-09"). The guidance changes how companies account for certain aspects of equity-based payments to employees. Entities will be required to recognize income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. The guidance also allows an employer to repurchase more of an ~~employee’s~~employee's shares than it can under current guidance for tax withholding purposes providing for withholding at the ~~employee’s~~employee's maximum rate as opposed to the minimum rate without triggering liability accounting and to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted the accounting guidance contained within ASU 2016-09.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 amending the existing accounting standards for lease accounting and requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months, including those classified as operating leases. Both the asset and liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, with the asset being subject to adjustments such as initial direct costs. Consistent with current U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), the presentation of expenses and cash flows will depend primarily on the classification of the lease as either a finance or an operating lease. The new standard also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases in order to provide additional information about the nature of an organization's leasing activities. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires modified retrospective application. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. As our operations are conducted in leased facilities, this ASU may require us to disclose additional information about our leasing activities. The Company plans to evaluate the impact of the new guidance on ~~our~~its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, simplifying the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes by requiring all deferred taxes, along with any related valuation allowance, to be presented as noncurrent. This ASU is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2017, which the Company has applied retroactively. Upon the adoption of the guidance, the Company has reclassified $471,000 from current assets to non-current assets, and reduced both non-current and current liabilities by $2,389,000.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance under ASU 2014-09 that will supersede the existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The new standard, along with amendments in 2015 and 2016, focuses on creating a single source of revenue guidance for revenue arising from contracts with ~~customers for all industries.~~customers. The objective of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue when it transfers the promised goods or services to its customers at an amount that represents what the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ~~In July 2015,~~Additionally, the ~~FASB deferred~~new standard requires enhanced disclosures about the ~~effective date by one year (ASU 2015-14). This ASU~~nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including revenue recognition policies to identify performance obligations, assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain and fulfill a contract, and significant judgments in measurement and recognition. The standard, as amended, will ~~now~~ be effective for annual periods ~~and~~beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within ~~those annual periods, beginning~~that reporting period.

The Company, along with its third-party advisor, is currently performing an analysis that the new standard will have on ~~or after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before~~its revenue for both the ~~original effective~~domestic and international segments. This analysis includes evaluating which, if any, practical expedients the Company will elect upon adoption. Based on analysis to date, we currently believe our revenue recognition under the new standard will be mostly consistent with the current standard, with performance obligations being satisfied over time as our customers simultaneously receive and consume the benefits of ~~December 15, 2016. Since~~our performance obligations. We expect that the ~~issuance~~disclosures in the notes to our consolidated financial statements related to revenue recognition will be significantly expanded under the new standard, specifically regarding quantitative and qualitative information about performance obligations.

The Company expects to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective approach, under which the cumulative effect of the ~~original standard, the FASB has issued several other subsequent updates including the following: 1) clarification~~initial application of the ~~implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations (ASU 2016-08); 2) further guidance on identifying performance obligations~~new standard will be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in ~~a contract as well as clarifications on~~ the ~~licensing implementation guidance (ASU 2016-10); 3) rescission~~first quarter of ~~several SEC Staff Announcements that~~2018. As we are ~~codified~~still in Topic 605 (ASU 2016-11); 4) additional guidance and practical expedients in response to identified implementation issues (ASU 2016-12); and 5) technical corrections and improvements (ASU 2016-20). The company is currently assessing the ~~method under which it will adopt and the potential impact~~process of ~~adopting~~evaluating ASU 2014-09 ~~on its financial position, results of operations, cash flow and/or disclosures.~~

along with the subsequent amendments our initial assessment may change as we continue to refine our systems, processes, controls and assumptions.

13~~13.~~. Capital Lease Obligations

The Company has an outstanding capital lease obligation with an interest rate of 5.8%. The related capital lease assets balances are detailed below (in thousands):

Start Date:

Original Cost

Accumulated

Amortization

Net Book Value at

June 30, 2017

Original Cost

Accumulated

Amortization

Net Book Value at

September 30, 2017

January 2017

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited) (continued)

Annual future minimum lease payments required under the leases, together with the present value as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount

2017	$	14
2018		28
2017			$	7
2018				28
2019		28		28
Total		70		63
Less amount representing interest		7		4
Present value of net minimum lease payments included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and long term debt	$	63	$	59

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Item 2.~~Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form10-Q~~10-Q~~ (this "Quarterly Report") contains "forward-looking statements" within the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, made by, or respecting, SPAR Group, Inc. ("SGRP") and its subsidiaries (together with SGRP, the "SPAR Group" or the "Company"), and this Quarterly Report has been filed by SGRP with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). There also are "forward-looking statements" contained in ~~SGRP's~~SGRP's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (as filed, the "Annual Report"), as filed with the SEC on April 17, 2017, in ~~SGRP's~~SGRP's definitive Proxy Statement respecting its Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 18, 2017 (the "Proxy Statement"), which SGRP filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017, and ~~SGRP's~~SGRP's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other reports and statements as and when filed with the SEC (including this Quarterly Report, the Annual Report and the Proxy Statement, each a "SEC Report"). "Forward-looking statements" are defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and other applicable federal and state securities laws, rules and regulations, as amended (together with the Securities Act and Exchange Act, the "Securities Laws").

All statements (other than those that are purely historical) are forward-looking statements. Words such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend", "believe", "estimate", "anticipate," "continue," "plan," "project," or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions also identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements made by the Company in this Quarterly Report or the Annual Report may include (without limitation) statements regarding: risks, uncertainties, cautions, circumstances and other factors ("Risks"); and plans, intentions, expectations, guidance or other information respecting the pursuit or achievement of the ~~Company's~~Company's five corporate objectives (growth, customer value, employee development, greater productivity & efficiency, and increased earnings per share), building upon the ~~Company's~~Company's strong foundation, leveraging compatible global opportunities, growing the ~~Company's~~Company's client base and contracts, continuing to strengthen its balance sheet, growing revenues and improving profitability through organic growth, new business development and strategic acquisitions, and continuing to control costs. The ~~Company's~~Company's forward-looking statements also include (without limitation) those made in the Annual Report in "Business", "Risk Factors", "Legal Proceedings", ~~"Management's~~"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", "Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance", "Executive Compensation", "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters", and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence".

You should carefully review and consider the ~~Company's~~Company's forward-looking statements (including all risk factors and other cautions and uncertainties) and other information made, contained or noted in or incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report, the Annual Report, the Proxy Statement and the other applicable SEC Reports, but you should not place undue reliance on any of them. The results, actions, levels of activity,performance, achievements or condition of the Company (including its affiliates, assets, business, clients, capital, cash flow, credit, expenses, financial condition, income, liabilities, liquidity, locations, marketing, operations, performance, prospects, sales, strategies, taxation or other achievement, results, risks, trends or condition) and other events and circumstances planned, intended, anticipated, estimated or otherwise expected by the Company (collectively, "Expectations"), and our forward-looking statements (including all Risks) and other information reflect the ~~Company's~~Company's currentviews about future events and circumstances. Although the Company believes those Expectations and views are reasonable, the results, actions, levels of activity, performance, achievements or condition of the Company or other events and circumstances may differ materially from our Expectations and views, and they cannot be assured or guarantied by the Company, since they are subject to Risks and other assumptions, changes in circumstances and unpredictable events (many of which are beyond the ~~Company's~~Company's control).In addition, new Risks arise from time to time, and it is impossible for the Company to predict these matters or how they may arise or affect the Company. Accordingly, the Company cannot assure you that its Expectations will be achieved in whole or in part, that it has identified all potential Risks, or that it can successfully avoid or mitigate such Risks in whole or in part, any of which could be significant and materially adverse to the Company and the value of your investment in the ~~Company's~~Company's Common Stock.

These forward-looking statements reflect the ~~Company's~~Company's Expectations, views, Risks and assumptions only as of the date of thisQuarterly~~Quarterly~~Report, and the Company does not intend, assume any obligation, or promise to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements (including any Risks or Expectations) or other information (in whole or in part), whether as a result of new information, new or worsening Risks or uncertainties, changed circumstances, future events, recognition, or otherwise.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

GENERAL

The Company is a diversified international merchandising, business technology and marketing services company and provides a broad array of services worldwide to help companies improve their sales, operating efficiency and profits at retail locations. The Company provides its merchandising and other marketing services to manufacturers, distributors and retailers worldwide, primarily in mass merchandise, office supply, value, grocery, drug, independent, convenience, toy, home improvement and electronics stores. The Company also provides furniture and other product assembly services in stores, homes and offices. The Company has supplied these services in the United States since certain of its predecessors were formed in 1979 and internationally since the Company acquired its first international subsidiary in Japan in May of 2001. The Company currently does business in 10 countries that encompass approximately 50% of the total world population through its operations in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey.

Merchandising services primarily consist of regularly scheduled, special project and other product services provided at store level, and the Company may be engaged by either the retailer or the manufacturer. Those services may include restocking and adding new products, removing spoiled or outdated products, resetting categories "on the shelf" in accordance with client or store schematics, confirming and replacing shelf tags, setting new sale or promotional product displays and advertising, replenishing kiosks, demonstrating or promoting a product, providing on-site audit and in-store event staffing services and providing product assembly services in stores, homes and offices. Other merchandising services include whole store or departmental product sets or resets, including new store openings, new product launches and in-store demonstrations, special seasonal or promotional merchandising, focused product support and product recalls. The Company continues to seek to expand its merchandising, assembly and marketing services business throughout the world.

An Overview of the Merchandising and Marketing Services Industry

The merchandising and marketing services industry includes manufacturers, retailers, brokers, distributors and professional service merchandising companies. Merchandising services primarily involve placing orders, shelf maintenance, display placement, reconfiguring products on store shelves and replenishing product inventory. Additional marketing services include but are not limited to new store sets and remodels, audits, sales assist, installation and assembly, product demos/sampling, promotion and various others. The Company believes that merchandising and marketing services add value to retailers, manufacturers and other businesses and enhance sales by making a product more visible and more available to consumers.

Historically, retailers staffed their stores as needed to provide these services to ensure that ~~manufacturers'~~manufacturers' inventory levels, the advantageous display of new items on shelves, and the maintenance of shelf schematics and product placement were properly merchandised. However, retailers in an effort to improve their margins, have decreased their own store personnel and increased their reliance on manufacturers to perform such services. At one time, manufacturers attempted to satisfy the need for merchandising and marketing services in retail stores by utilizing their own sales representatives. Additionally, retailers also used their own employees to merchandise their stores to satisfy their own merchandising needs. However, both manufacturers and retailers discovered that using their own sales representatives and employees for this purpose was expensive and inefficient. In addition, the changing retail environment, driven by the rise of digital and mobile technology, is fostering even more challenges to the labor model of retailers and manufacturers. These challenges include increased consumer demand for more interaction and engagement with retail sales associates, stores remodels to accommodate more technology, installation and continual maintenance of in-store digital and mobile technology, in-store pick-up and fulfillment of online orders and increased inventory management to reduce out-of-stocks from omnichannel shopping.

Most manufacturers and retailers have been, and SPAR Group believes they will continue, outsourcing their merchandising and marketing service needs to third parties capable of operating at a lower cost by (among other things) serving multiple manufacturers simultaneously. The Company also believes that it is well positioned, as a domestic and international merchandising ~~business technology~~ and marketing services company, to provide these services to retailers, manufacturers and other businesses around the world more effectively and efficiently than other available alternatives.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Another significant trend impacting the merchandising and marketing services business is the continued preference of consumers to shop in stores and their tendency to make product purchase decisions once inside the store. Accordingly, merchandising and marketing services and in-store product promotions have proliferated and diversified. Retailers are continually re-merchandising and re-modeling entire departments and stores in an effort to respond to new product developments and changes in consumer preferences. We estimate that these activities have increased in frequency over the last few years. Both retailers and manufacturers are seeking third party merchandisers to help them meet the increased demand for these labor-intensive services.

In addition, the consolidation of many retailers and changing store formats have created opportunities for third party merchandisers when an acquired ~~retailer's~~retailer's stores are converted to the look and format of the acquiring retailer. In many of those cases, stores are completely remodeled and re-merchandised to implement the new store formats.

SPAR Group believes the current trend in business toward globalization fits well with its expansion model. As companies expand into foreign markets they will need assistance in merchandising or marketing their products. As evidenced in the United States, retailer and manufacturer sponsored merchandising and marketing programs are both expensive and inefficient. The Company also believes that the difficulties encountered by these programs are only exacerbated by the logistics of operating in foreign markets. This environment has created an opportunity for the Company to exploit its global Internet and data network based technology (through computers or mobile devices) and its business model worldwide.

The ~~Company's~~Company's Domestic and International Geographic Segments:

The Company provides similar merchandising, business technology and marketing services throughout the world, operating within two reportable segments, its Domestic and International Divisions. The Company tracks and reports certain financial information separately for these two segments using the same metrics. The primary measurement utilized by management is operating profit level, historically the key indicator of long-term growth and profitability, as the Company is focused on reinvesting the operating profits of each of its international subsidiaries back into local markets in an effort to improve its market share and continued expansion efforts. Certain financial information regarding each of the Company's two segments, which includes, among other items, their respective net revenues, operating income and net income for each of the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, and their respective assets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, is provided above in Note 10 to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements –SegmentInformation.

The ~~Company's~~Company's international business in each territory outside the United States is conducted through a foreign subsidiary incorporated in its primary territory. The primary territory establishment date (which may include predecessors), the percentage of the Company's equity ownership, and the principal office location for its US (domestic) subsidiaries and each of its foreign (international) subsidiaries is as follows:

Primary Territory

Date

Established

SGRP Percentage

Ownership

Principal Office Location

Date

Established

SGRP Percentage

Ownership

Principal Office Location

United States of America

1979

100%

White Plains, New York,

United States of America

1979

100%

White Plains, New York, United States of America

Japan

May 2001

100%

Tokyo, Japan

May 2001

100%

Tokyo, Japan

Canada

June 2003

100%

Vaughan, Canada

June 2003

100%

Vaughan, Canada

South Africa

April 2004

51%

Durban, South Africa

April 2004

51%

Durban, South Africa

India

April 2004

51%

New Delhi, India

April 2004

51%

New Delhi, India

Australia

April 2006

51%

Melbourne, Australia

April 2006

51%

Melbourne, Australia

China

March 2010

51%

Shanghai, China

March 2010

51%

Shanghai, China

Mexico

August 2011

51%

Mexico City, Mexico

August 2011

51%

Mexico City, Mexico

Turkey

November 2011

51%

Istanbul, Turkey

November 2011

51%

Istanbul, Turkey

Brazil¹

September 2016

51%

Sao Paolo, Brazil

September 2016

51%

Sao Paolo, Brazil

In September 2016, the Company established a new joint venture subsidiary in Brazil as noted above in Note 11 to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements –Purchase of Interests in Subsidiaries. This new subsidiary purchased stock in two Brazilian companies – New Momentum, Ltda. and New Momentum Servicos Temporarios ~~Ltda~~.Ltda.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Critical Accounting Policies

Other than the adoption of accounting pronouncements as described above, there have been no significant changes to the ~~Company’s~~Company's accounting policies since it filed its audited consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, with the SEC on April 17, 2017.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

Results of Operations

Three months endedSeptember ~~June~~ 30, 2017, compared to three months ended~~June~~ September 30, 2016

The following table sets forth selected financial data and data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percent data).

	Three Months EndedJune 30,												Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017						2016						2017						2016
		$		%				$		%				$		%				$		%
Net revenues	$	42,722			100.0	%	$	29,732			100.0	%	$	48,752			100.0	%	$	33,438			100.0	%
Cost of revenues		33,765			79.0			22,705			76.4			39,960			82.0			26,162			78.2
Gross profit		8,957			21.0			7,027			23.6			8,792			18.0			7,276			21.8
Selling, general & administrative expense		7,452			17.4			5,763			19.4			7,477			15.3			6,360			19.0
Depreciation & amortization		534			1.2			484			1.6			487			1.0			486			1.5
Operating income		971			2.4			780			2.6			828			1.7			430			1.3
Interest expense, net		54			0.1			31			0.1			110			0.2			51			0.2
Other (income), net		(135	)		(0.3	)		(80	)		(0.3	)		(78	)		(0.2	)		(78	)		(0.2	)
Income before income taxes		1,052			2.6			829			2.8			796			1.7			457			1.3
Income tax expense		278			0.7			226			0.8
Income tax expense (benefit)														210			0.4			(31	)		(0.1	)
Net income		774			1.9			603			2.0			586			1.3			488			1.4
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(431	)		(1.0	)		(320	)		(1.1	)		(340	)		(0.7	)		(546	)		(1.6	)
Net income attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	343			0.9	%	$	283			0.9	%
Net income (loss) attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.													$	246			0.6	%	$	(58	)		(0.2	)%

Net Revenues

Net revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, were ~~$42.7~~$48.8 million, compared to ~~$29.7~~$33.4 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016, an increase of ~~$13.0~~$15.3 million or ~~43.7%~~45.8%. The increase in net revenue is primarily attributable to the acquisition of our Brazil subsidiary, which contributed ~~$8.2~~$9.3 million. In addition, the remainder of our international segment increased $2.3 million, and our domestic segment increased ~~$2.5~~$3.7 million.

Domestic net revenues totaled ~~$13.7~~$15.1 million in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$11.2~~$11.3 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of ~~22.4%~~32.9%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in project work compared to last year.

International net revenues totaled ~~$29.0~~$33.7 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$18.5~~$22.1 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of ~~$10.5~~$11.6 million or ~~56.6%~~52.4%. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to the September 2016 acquisition of our Brazilian operation, which added ~~$8.2~~$9.3 million, ~~and~~ an increase in South Africa of ~~$2.2~~$0.8 million, and an increase in Japan of $0.6 million.

Cost of Revenues

The Company's cost of revenues consists of its on-site labor and field ~~administration~~administration fees, travel and other direct labor-related expenses and was ~~79.0%~~82.0% of its net revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, and ~~76.4%~~78.2% of its net revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016.

Domestic cost of revenues was ~~71.7%~~76.5% of net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and 73.5% of net revenues for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2017, and 69.5% of net revenues for the three months ended June~~September 30, 2016. The increase in cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues of ~~2.2~~3.0 percentage points was due primarily to continued price pressure and an unfavorable mix of project work compared to the same period last year. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately ~~80.8%~~68% and ~~80.9%~~76%, respectively, of the Company's domestic cost of revenues resulted from in-store merchandiser specialist, on-site assembly technician and field administration services, purchased from certain of the Company's affiliates, ~~SPAR Business Services, Inc. ("SBS"),~~SBS, and ~~SPAR Administrative Services, Inc. ("SAS"),~~SAS, respectively. (See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements -Related-Party Transactions.)

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Internationally, the cost of revenues increased to ~~82.5%~~84.4% of net revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~80.5%~~80.7% of net revenues for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The cost of revenue increase of ~~2.0~~3.7 percentage points was primarily due to a mix of higher cost margin business in Brazil, China and ~~South Africa.~~Mexico.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company include its corporate overhead, project management, information technology, executive compensation, human resources, legal and accounting expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses ~~were~~were approximately $7.5 million and ~~$5.8~~$6.4 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Domestic selling, general and administrative expenses totaled ~~$3.2~~$2.9 million ~~and $2.7 million~~ for both the three month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and ~~2016,~~2016, respectively. ~~The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was directly related to increased spending on accounting and legal services.~~

International selling, general and administrative expenses totaled ~~$4.2~~$4.6 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$3.1~~$3.5 million for the same period in 2016. The increase of approximately $1.1 million was primarily ~~attributable~~attributable to the Brazil acquisition.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization charges totaled ~~$534,000~~$487,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, and ~~$484,000~~$486,000 for the same period in 2016.

Interest Expense

The Company's net interest expense was ~~$54,000~~$110,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$31,000~~$51,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The change is due primarily to increased domestic average borrowing and interest rate and lower interest income due to distribution of cash in the form of a dividend from South Africa.

Other Income

Other income totaled ~~$135,000 and $80,000~~$78,000 for both the three ~~months~~month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~respectively, with the increase primarily in South Africa.~~respectively.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was ~~$278,000~~$210,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to a net tax benefit of $31,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2017,~~2016. The change is due primarily to improved domestic performance compared to ~~$226,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016.~~prior year.

Non-controlling Interest

Net operating profits from ~~the~~the non-controlling interest, from the Company's 51% owned subsidiaries, resulted in a reduction of net income attributable to SPAR Group, Inc. of ~~$431,000~~$340,000 and ~~$320,000~~$546,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Net Income

The ~~Company~~Company reported net income of ~~$343,000~~$246,000 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, or ~~$0.02~~$0.01 per diluted share, compared to a net ~~income~~loss of ~~$283,000,~~$58,000, or ~~$0.01~~$0.00 per diluted share, for the corresponding period last year. The change is due primarily to increased domestic and international sales.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Nine~~Six~~months ended~~June~~ September 30, 2017, compared to~~six~~nine ~~months ended~~~~June~~ months ended September 30, 2016

The following table sets forth selected financial data and data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percent data).

	Six Months EndedJune 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017						2016						2017						2016
		$		%				$		%				$		%				$		%
Net revenues	$	82,608			100.0	%	$	56,343			100.0	%	$	131,361			100.0	%	$	89,781			100.0	%
Cost of revenues		65,604			79.4			43,147			76.6			105,563			80.4			69,309			77.2
Gross profit		17,004			20.6			13,196			23.4			25,798			19.6			20,472			22.8
Selling, general & administrative expense		14,510			17.6			11,277			20.0			21,988			16.7			17,637			19.7
Depreciation & amortization		1,039			1.3			972			1.7			1,526			1.2			1,459			1.6
Operating income		1,455			1.7			947			1.7			2,284			1.7			1,376			1.5
Interest expense, net		7			0.0			60			0.1			117			0.1			111			0.1
Other (income), net		(197	)		(0.2	)		(105	)		(0.2	)		(275	)		(0.2	)		(183	)		(0.2	)
Income before income taxes		1,645			1.9			992			1.8			2,442			1.8			1,448			1.6
Income tax expense		697			0.8			231			0.4			907			0.7			200			0.2
Net income		948			1.1			761			1.4			1,535			1.1			1,248			1.4
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(849	)		(1.0	)		(618	)		(1.1	)		(1,189	)		(0.9	)		(1,164	)		(1.3	)
Net income attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	99			0.1	%	$	143			0.3	%	$	346			0.2	%	$	84			0.1	%

Net Revenues

Net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, were ~~$82.6~~$131.3 million, compared to ~~$56.3~~$89.8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016, an increase of ~~$26.3~~$41.5 million or ~~46.6%~~46.3%. The increase in net revenue attributable to our international segment was ~~$22.2~~$33.8 million, primarily from our Brazil, India and South Africa operations. Our domestic segment contributed an increase of ~~$4.1~~$7.8 million compared to last year.

Domestic net ~~revenues~~revenues totaled ~~$25.0~~$40.1 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$20.9~~$32.3 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of ~~19.4%~~24.2%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in project work compared to last year.

International net ~~revenues~~revenues totaled ~~$57.6~~$91.3 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$35.4~~$57.5 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of ~~$22.2~~$33.8 million or ~~62.7%~~58.7%. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to the September 2016 acquisition of our Brazilian operation, which contributed ~~$18.1~~$27.3 million, and an increase in South Africa by ~~$4.0~~$4.8 million.

Cost of Revenues

The Company's cost of revenues consists of its on-site labor and field administration fees, travel and other direct labor-related expenses and was ~~79.4%~~80.4% of its net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, and ~~76.6%~~77.2% of its net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016.

Domestic cost of revenues was ~~71.9%~~73.6% of net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, ~~and 70.4%~~and 71.5% of net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The increase in cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues of ~~1.5~~2.1 percentage points was due primarily to continued price pressure and an unfavorable mix of project work compared to the same period last year. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately ~~82.3%~~77% and ~~81.5%~~80%, respectively, of the Company's domestic cost of revenues resulted from in-store merchandiser specialist, on-site assembly technician and field administration services, purchased from certain of the Company's affiliates, ~~SPAR Business Services, Inc. ("SBS"),~~SBS and ~~SPAR Administrative Services, Inc. ("SAS"),~~SAS, respectively. (See Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements -Related-Party Transactions.)

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Internationally, the cost of revenues increased to ~~82.7%~~83.3% of net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~80.2%~~80.4% of net revenues for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The cost of revenue increase of ~~2.5~~2.9 percentage points was primarily due to a mix of higher cost margin business in Brazil and Mexico.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses of the Company include its corporate overhead, project management, information technology, executive compensation, human resources, legal and accounting expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses ~~were~~were approximately ~~$14.5~~$22.0 million and ~~$11.3~~$17.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Domestic selling, general and administrative expenses totaled ~~$6.0~~$8.9 million and ~~$5.5~~$8.3 million for the ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was directly related to increased spending on accounting and legal services.

International selling, general and administrative expenses totaled ~~$8.5~~$13.1 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$5.8~~$9.3 million for the same period in 2016. The increase of approximately ~~$2.7~~$3.8 million was primarily attributable to the Brazil acquisition.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization charges totaled ~~$1.0~~$1.5 million for both the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, and 2016.

Interest Expense

The Company's net interest expense was ~~$7,000~~$117,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to net interest expense of ~~$60,000~~$111,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. ~~The change was primarily due to interest earned on cash in South Africa.~~

Other Income

Other income totaled ~~$197,000~~$275,000 and ~~$105,000~~$183,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with the increase primarily in South Africa.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was ~~$697,000~~$907,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$231,000~~$200,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The ~~increase in tax expense was~~change is due primarily ~~due~~ to ~~tax on the distribution of earnings received from our South African subsidiary.~~improved domestic performance compared to prior year.

Non-controlling Interest

Net operating profits from the non-controlling interest, from the Company's 51% owned subsidiaries, resulted in a reduction of net income attributable to SPAR Group, Inc. of ~~$849,000 and $618,000~~$1.2 million for both the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and ~~2016, respectively.~~2016.

Net Income

The Company reported a net income of ~~$99,000~~$346,000 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June 30,~~September 30, 2017, or ~~$0.00~~$0.02 per diluted share, compared to ~~$143,000,~~$84,000, or ~~$0.01~~$0.00 per diluted share, for the corresponding period last year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company had a net income before ~~non-controlling~~non-controlling interest of ~~$1.0~~$1.5 million.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$3.9~~$6.4 million and ~~$446,000~~$2.1 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The net cash provided by operating activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, was primarily due to cash-impacting earnings and ~~a decrease in accounts receivable, plus~~ an increase in accrued expenses, ~~and~~ other current liabilities, customer incentives and deposits and accounts payable, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets.

Net cash used in investing activities was ~~$640,000~~$1.0 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, compared to ~~$732,000~~$1.5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The net cash used in investing activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, was due to fixed asset additions, primarily capitalized software.

Net cash used in financing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, was approximately ~~$3.0~~$5.7 million, compared to ~~$338,000~~$1.8 million provided by financing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. Net cash used in financing activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, was primarily ~~a result~~due to net payments on lines of credit, and a distribution to non-controlling local investors in South ~~Africa and also net payments on lines of credit.~~Africa.

The ~~above~~above activity and the impact of foreign exchange rate changes resulted in an increase in cash and cash equivalents for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 of ~~$1.0 million.~~approximately $338,000.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company had net working capital of ~~$11.8 million,~~$12.9 million, as compared to net working capital of $12.5 million at December 31, 2016. The Company's current ratio was 1.4 at both ~~June~~September 30, 2017, and December 31, ~~2016.~~ 2016, respectively.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this ~~item.~~item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer included a review of the restatement described in the filing of this Form 10-Q, where we restated our consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and consolidated statements of equity. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, at the reasonable assurance level, to enable us to record, process, summarize and report information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit within the time periods specified in the SEC rules or forms due to the material weakness described below.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting associated with the recognition of accumulated other comprehensive loss both in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet and the comprehensive loss portion of the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive loss.

~~The~~The Company did not design and maintain effective control over the assessment of the presentation of foreign currency translation adjustments when preparing the consolidated financial statements. While this is considered a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, the Company determined that the related impact was not material to the results of operations or financial position for any prior annual or interim period as described above in Note 2 of the ~~Company’s~~Company's prior period financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the material weakness as set forth above during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, identified in connection with our evaluation that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management~~Management’s~~'s Remediation Initiatives

We have taken, and continue to take, the actions described below to remediate the identified material weakness. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal controls over financial reporting, our senior management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or modify the remediation efforts, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete certain of the remediation measures described in this section. While the Audit Committee and senior management are closely monitoring the implementation, until the remediation efforts discussed in this section, including any additional remediation efforts that our senior management identifies as necessary, are completed, tested, and determined effective, the material weakness described above will continue to exist.

To address this material weakness, our management has implemented new procedures and internal controls surrounding the reporting of its majority owned international subsidiaries to ensure comprehensive income (loss) and non-controlling interest are properly adjusted to account for the impact of foreign currency translation.

As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to obtain an attestation report from the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting, and accordingly, such an attestation has not been obtained or included in this Quarterly Report.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company executes the services it provides to its domestic clients primarily through independent field merchandising, auditing, assembly and other field personnel (each a "Field Specialist"), almost all of whom are engaged and provided as independent contractors by SBS. For contractual details and payment amounts, see Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements –Related Party Transactions –Domestic Related Party Services, above.

The appropriateness of ~~SBS's~~SBS's treatment of its Field Specialists as independent contractors has been periodically subject to legal challenge (both currently and historically) by various states and others, SBS's expenses of defending those challenges and other proceedings have historically been reimbursed by the Company under SBS's Prior Agreement, and SBS's expenses of defending those challenges and other proceedings were reimbursed by the Company during the three month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in the amounts of ~~$179,000~~$39,000 and ~~$443,000,~~$144,000, respectively), and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in the amounts of $218,000 and $587,000, respectively), after determination (on a case by case basis) that those defense expenses were costs of providing services to the Company. The Company has advised SBS that, since there is no currently effective comprehensive written services agreement with SBS, the Company will continue to review and decide each request by SBS for reimbursement of its legal defense expenses (including appeals) on a case-by-case basis in its discretion, including the relative costs and benefits to the Company. The Company has not agreed, and does not currently intend, to reimburse SBS for any judgment or similar amount (including any damages, settlement, or related tax, penalty, or ~~interest~~interest) in any legal challenge or other proceedingagainst or involving SBS, and the Company does not believe it has ever done so (other than in insignificant nuisance amounts). However, there ~~are~~can be no ~~assurances~~assurance that SBS will be able to satisfy any such judgment or similar amount resulting from any adverse legal determination, that SBS or someone else will not claim, or that SBS will be able to successfully defend any claim, that the Company is liable (through reimbursement, indemnification or otherwise) for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that SBS will succeed in defending any such legal challenge, the legal expenses of prolonged litigation and appeals could continue to be (and have from time to time been) significant, and prolonged litigation and appeals and any adverse determination in any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on SBS's ability to provide services needed by the Company and the Company's costs of doing business.

SBS Clothier Litigation

Melissa Clothier was engaged by SBS (then known as SPAR Marketing Services, Inc.) and provided services pursuant to the terms of an "Independent Merchandiser Agreement" acknowledging her engagement as an independent contractor. On June 30, 2014, Ms. Clothier filed suit against SBS and the Company styled Case No. RG12 639317, in the Superior Court in Alameda County, California, in which Ms. Clothier asserted claims on behalf of herself and a putative class of similarly situated merchandisers in California who are or were classified as independent contractors at any time between July 16, 2008, and June 30, 2014. Ms. Clothier alleged that she and other class members were misclassified as independent contractors and that, as a result of this misclassification, the defendants improperly underpaid them in violation of various California minimum wage and overtime laws. The Company was subsequently dismissed from the action without prejudice. The court ordered that the case be heard in two phases. Phase one was limited to the determination of whether members of the class were misclassified as independent contractors. After hearing evidence, receiving post-trial briefings and considering the issues, the Court issued its Statement of Decision on September 9, 2016, finding that the class members had been misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees. The parties have now moved into phase two to determine damages (if any)~~. No trial date for phase two has been set and the parties are currently engaged in~~, which included discovery as to the measure of damages in ~~this~~the case. Trial on phase two was scheduled for September 11, 2017, but was postponed. The Court has scheduled a case management conference for December 19, 2017, to establish a new trial date for phase two. SBS has advised the Company that SBS will appeal the adverse phase one determination when permitted under the court's rules.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

SBS Rodgers Litigation

Maceo Rodgers was engaged by and provided services to SBS pursuant to the terms of his "Master Agreements" with SBS acknowledging his engagement as an independent contractor. On February 21, 2014, Rodgers filed suit against SBS, Robert G. Brown and William H. Bartels, styled Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-00055, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Galveston Division). Plaintiff asserted claims on behalf of himself and an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who provided services to SBS as independent contractors at any time on or after July 15, 2012, claiming they all were misclassified as independent contractors and that, as a result of this misclassification, the Defendants improperly underpaid them in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime and minimum wage provisions. Although the Court conditionally certified the class on December 8, 2015, only 61 individuals joined the action as opt-in plaintiffs, and all but 11 of them have potentially disqualifying arbitration provisions, residences outside the class's geographic area, or late opt-in filings, and ~~are being~~were challenged by the Defendants in various ~~pending~~ motions, including a motion to decertify the class. The Court, however, did not rule on these motions and instead stayed the case on September 19, 2017, to allow the parties to mediate. On October 24, 2017, the Court granted the parties' joint motion to extend the stay order until January 31, 2018.

SBS and SGRP Hogan Litigation

Paradise Hogan was engaged by and provided services to SBS as an independent contractor pursuant to the terms of an "Independent Contractor Master Agreement" with SBS acknowledging his engagement as an independent contractor. On January 6, 2017, Hogan filed suit against SBS and ~~SPAR Group, Inc. ("SGRP"~~SGRP and part of the Company), styled Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-10024-LTS, in the U.S. District Court for District of Massachusetts. Hogan initially asserted claims on behalf of himself and an alleged nationwide class of similarly situated individuals who provided services to SBS and SGRP as independent contractors. Hogan alleged that he and other alleged class members were misclassified as independent contractors, and as a result of this purported misclassification, Hogan asserted claims on behalf of himself and the alleged Massachusetts class members under the Massachusetts Wage Act and Minimum Wage Law for failure to pay overtime and minimum wages, as well as state law claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, Hogan asserted claims on behalf of himself and the nationwide class for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime and minimum wage provisions. On March 28, 2017, the Company moved to refer Hogan's claim to arbitration pursuant to his agreement, to dismiss or stay Hogan's case pending arbitration, and to dismiss Hogan's case for failure to state a specific claim upon which relief could be granted. ~~Plaintiff’s~~Plaintiff's counsel subsequently notified ~~SGRP’s~~SGRP's attorney of their intent to amend their Complaint without prejudice. The Amended Complaint, which was filed on May 2, 2017, eliminated all of ~~Plaintiff’s~~Plaintiff's claims except for a single claim against SGRP for failure to pay Hogan and a similarly situated class of Massachusetts independent contractors all wages under the Massachusetts Wage Act and a separate, but identical claim against SBS. The result of the amendment significantly narrowed the scope of the litigation and eliminated the original nationwide Fair Labor Standards Act claims. The Company was granted leave to refile their motion to compel arbitration ~~and~~ to dismiss ~~Hogan’s~~Hogan's case pending arbitration, and to dismiss ~~Hogan’s~~Hogan's case for failure to state a specific claim upon which relief could be granted. The ~~Company’s~~Company's motion was filed on June 7, 2017, ~~Plaintiff’s~~Plaintiff's opposition to the ~~Company’s~~Company's motion was filed on June 21, 2017, and the Company thereafter filed a reply brief in support of its motion on June 30, 2017. The parties currently await a hearing date on the ~~Company’s~~Company's motion.

Potential Adverse Effects of the SBS Litigation

Any prolonged continuation of or material increase in the legal defense costs of SBS (and thus the reimbursable expenses SBS may charge to and that may be paid by the ~~Company)~~Companyto the extent reimbursement is approved by the Company in its discretion), the failure of SBS to satisfy any judgment or similar amount (including any damages, settlement, or related tax, penalty, or interest) in any legal challenge or other proceeding imposed against or involving SBS, any claim by SBS, any other related party or any third party that the Company is somehow liable for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS or other related party, any judicial determination that the Company is somehow liable for any such judgment or similar amount imposed against SBS or other related party (in whole or in part), any decrease in SBS's performance (quality or otherwise), any inability by SBS to execute the services for the Company, or any increase in the Company's use of employees (rather than independent contractors) as its domestic Field Specialists, in each case in whole or in part, could have a material adverse effect on the Company or its performance or condition (including its assets, business, clients, capital, cash flow, credit, expenses, financial condition, income, liabilities, liquidity, locations, marketing, operations, prospects, sales, strategies, taxation or other achievement, results or condition), whether actual or as planned, intended, anticipated, estimated or otherwise expected. See Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements –Related Party Transactions –Domestic Related Party Services, above.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

~~Item 1A. Risk Factors~~

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Existing Risk Factors

Various risk factors applicable to the Company and its businesses are described in Item 1A under the caption "Risk Factors" in the 2016 Annual Report, which risk factors are incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report. There have been no material changes in the Company's risk factors since the 2016 Annual Report other than as disclosed below.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to remediate this material weakness, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, which could adversely affect investor views of us and the value of our common stock.

As a public company, we are required to comply with the standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, regarding internal control over financial reporting. In connection with our evaluation of compliance, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017. A ~~“material weakness”~~"material weakness" is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During the first quarter of 2017, we have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting associated with the recognition of accumulated other comprehensive loss both in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet and the comprehensive loss portion of the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive loss. Specifically, the Company previously attributed 100% of the foreign currency translation adjustment recorded in annual comprehensive loss to the Company compared to allocating a proportionate amount to the non-controlling interest portion on both the consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive loss. To address this material weakness, our management has implemented new procedures and internal controls surrounding the reporting of its majority owned international subsidiaries to insure comprehensive income (loss) and non-controlling interest are properly adjusted to account for the impact of foreign currency translation. However, these steps will take time to fully integrate and confirm, and until the remediation steps are fully implemented and tested, the material weakness will continue to exist.

If we fail to remediate the identified material weakness or identify further material weaknesses, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, prevent fraud, or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and may lead to a decline in our stock price. In addition, our failure to timely file our periodic reports could eventually result in the delisting of our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange, regulatory sanctions from the SEC, and/or the breach of covenants in our credit facilities or of any preferred equity or debt securities we may issue in the future, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our operations and your investment in our common stock.

Item 2.2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not ~~applicable.~~applicable.

Item 3.3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Item 4.4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.5. Other Information

Not applicable.

~~SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

Item 6.6. Exhibits

~~10.1~~ 31.1	Eleventh Agreement of Amendment to Revolving Loan and Security Agreement And Other Documents, dated and effective as of June 29, 2017, by and among Sterling National Bank, as "Lender" and "Agent", and SPAR Group, Inc., SPAR National Assembly Services, Inc., SPAR Group International, Inc., SPAR Acquisition, Inc., SPAR Trademarks, Inc., SPAR Marketing Force, Inc., SPAR Canada, Inc., and SPAR Canada Company, each as a "Borrower" under such loan agreement as of such amendment date (incorporated by reference to SGRP's Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on July 5, 2017).

~~10.2~~		~~Separation Agreement as of May 15, 2017, between Scott Popaditch and SGRP (as filed herewith).~~

~~31.1~~		Certification of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as filed herewith.

31.2	Certification of the CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as filed herewith.

32.1	Certification of the CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as filed herewith.

32.2	Certification of the CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as filed herewith.

101.INS	XBRL Instance

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: ~~August~~ November 14, 2017	SPAR Group, Inc., Registrant


	By:~~By:~~ /s/ James R. Segreto
	James R. Segreto Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


		UNITED STATES
		SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
		WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


		Form 10-Q

Commission file number: ~~0-27408~~0-27408

SPAR Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	33-0684451
State of Incorporation	IRS Employer Identification No.

333 Westchester Avenue, South Building, Suite 204, White Plains, New York 10604
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

33PART II:
		OTHER INFORMATION
~~PART II:~~	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

PART I:	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements

	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(Unaudited)			(revised) (1)			(Unaudited)			(revised) (1)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,309		$	7,324		$	7,662		$	7,324
Accounts receivable, net		32,435			33,669			36,824			33,669
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,857			1,299			1,629			1,299
Total current assets		42,601			42,292			46,115			42,292

Property and equipment, net		2,487			2,536			2,551			2,536
Goodwill		1,836			1,847			1,841			1,847
Intangible assets, net		2,037			2,340			1,900			2,340
Deferred income taxes		4,869			4,694			4,468			4,694
Other assets		1,832			1,142			1,683			1,142
Total assets	$	55,662		$	54,851		$	58,558		$	54,851

Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	5,696		$	5,567		$	7,783		$	5,567
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		12,171			9,766			13,598			9,766
Due to affiliates		2,584			3,349
Due to affiliates								4,008			3,349
Customer incentives and deposits		1,528			1,305			1,587			1,305
Lines of credit and short-term loans		8,802			9,778			6,222			9,778
Total current liabilities		30,781			29,765			33,198			29,765
Long-term debt and other liabilities		40			4			33			4
Total liabilities		30,821			29,769			33,231			29,769

Commitments and Contingencies – See Note 9
Equity:
SPAR Group, Inc. equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value:Authorized and available shares– 2,445,598Issued and outstanding shares–None – June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016		–			–
Common stock, $.01 par value:Authorized shares – 47,000,000Issued shares –20,680,717 – June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016		207			207
Treasury stock, at cost42,460 shares – June 30, 2017 and37,877 shares – December 31, 2016		(51	)		(51	)
Preferred stock, $.01 par value: Authorized and available shares– 2,445,598 Issued and outstanding shares– None – September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016								–			–
Common stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares – 47,000,000 Issued shares – 20,680,717 – September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016								207			207
Treasury stock, at cost 115,123 shares – September 30, 2017, and 37,877 shares – December 31, 2016								(127	)		(51	)
Additional paid-in capital		16,198			16,093			16,234			16,093
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,021	)		(2,407	)		(2,060	)		(2,407	)
Retained earnings		5,999			5,835			6,246			5,835
Total SPAR Group, Inc. equity		20,332			19,677			20,500			19,677
Non-controlling interest		4,509			5,405			4,827			5,405
Total equity		24,841			25,082			25,327			25,082
Total liabilities and equity	$	55,662		$	54,851		$	58,558		$	54,851

Item 1	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 (Unaudited), and December 31, 2016	2

	Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016	3

	Consolidated Statement of Equity (Unaudited) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016	5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6

Item 2	~~Management's~~Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2526

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	33

Item 4	Controls and Procedures	33

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	35

Item 1A	Risk Factors	37

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	37

Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	37

Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	37 38

Item 5	Other Information	37 38

Item 6	Exhibits	38

SIGNATURES		39

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
				(revised) (1)						(revised) (1)
Net revenues	$	42,722		$	29,732		$	82,608		$	56,343
Cost of revenues		33,765			22,705			65,604			43,147
Gross profit		8,957			7,027			17,004			13,196

Selling, general and administrative expense		7,452			5,763			14,510			11,277
Depreciation and amortization		534			484			1,039			972
Operating income		971			780			1,455			947

Interest expense		54			31			7			60
Other (income), net		(135	)		(80	)		(197	)		(105	)
Income before income tax expense		1,052			829			1,645			992

Income tax expense		278			226			697			231
Net income		774			603			948			761
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(431	)		(320	)		(849	)		(618	)
Net income attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	343		$	283		$	99		$	143

Basic and diluted income per common share:	$	0.02		$	0.01		$	0.00		$	0.01

Weighted average common shares – basic		20,647			20,569			20,648			20,566

Weighted average common shares – diluted		21,312			21,328			21,336			21,331

Net income	$	774		$	603		$	948		$	761
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments		578			(213	)		742			(701	)
Comprehensive income		1,352			390			1,690			60
Comprehensive (income) attributable to non-controlling interest		(689	)		(173	)		(1,205	)		(156	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	663		$	217		$	485		$	(96	)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
				(revised) (1)						(revised) (1)
Net revenues	$	48,752		$	33,438		$	131,361		$	89,781
Cost of revenues		39,960			26,162			105,563			69,309
Gross profit		8,792			7,276			25,798			20,472

Selling, general and administrative expense		7,477			6,360			21,988			17,637
Depreciation and amortization		487			486			1,526			1,459
Operating income		828			430			2,284			1,376

Interest expense		110			51			117			111
Other (income), net		(78	)		(78	)		(275	)		(183	)
Income before income tax expense		796			457			2,442			1,448

Income tax expense (benefit)		210			(31	)		907			200
Net income		586			488			1,535			1,248
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(340	)		(546	)		(1,189	)		(1,164	)
Net income (loss) attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	246		$	(58	)	$	346		$	84

Basic and diluted income per common share:	$	0.01		$	–		$	0.02		$	–

Weighted average common shares – basic		20,602			20,607			20,633			20,580

Weighted average common shares – diluted		21,320			20,607			21,331			21,299

Net income	$	586		$	488		$	1,535		$	1,248
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(61	)		206			681			(495	)
Comprehensive income		525			694			2,216			753
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest		(318	)		(651	)		(1,523	)		(807	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	207		$	43		$	693		$	(54	)

														Accumulated
	Common Stock				TreasuryStock						Additional			Other					Non-						Common Stock				Treasury Stock						Additional			Accumulated Other					Non-
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Paid-In Capital			Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings		Controlling Interest			Total Equity			Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Paid-In Capital			Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings		Controlling Interest			Total Equity
Balance at January 1, 2017		20,681	$	207		38		$	(51	)	$	16,093		$	(2,407	)	$	5,835	$	5,405		$	25,082			20,681	$	207		38		$	(51	)	$	16,093		$	(2,407	)	$	5,835	$	5,405		$	25,082

Share-based compensation		–		–		–			–			130			–			–		–			130			–		–		–			–			178			–			–		–			178
Purchase of treasury shares		–		–		30			(32	)		–			–			–		–			(32	)		–		–		111			(121	)		–			–			–		–			(121	)
Reissued treasury shares – RSU's		–		–		(4	)		5			(5	)		–			–		–			–			–		–		(12	)		16			(16	)		–			–		–			–
Exercise of stock options		–		–		(21	)		27			(20	)		–			–		–			7			–		–		(22	)		29			(21	)		–			–		–			8
Distributions to non-controlling investors		–		–		–			–			–			–			–		(2,101	)		(2,101	)		–		–		–			–			–			–			–		(2,101	)		(2,101	)
Adoption of ASU 2016-09 (Note 12)		–		–		–			–			–			–			65		–			65			–		–		–			–			–			–			65		–			65
Other comprehensive income		–		–		–			–			–			386			–		356			742			–		–		–			–			–			347			–		334			681
Net income		–		–		–			–			–			–			99		849			948			–		–		–			–			–			–			346		1,189			1,535
Balance atJune 30, 2017		20,681	$	207		43		$	(51	)	$	16,198		$	(2,021	)	$	5,999	$	4,509		$	24,841
Balance at September 30, 2017																										20,681	$	207		115		$	(127	)	$	16,234		$	(2,060	)	$	6,246	$	4,827		$	25,327

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Operating activities
Net income	$	948		$	761		$	1,535		$	1,248
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		1,039			972			1,526			1,459
Bad debt expense, net of recoveries		68			21			93			317
Share based compensation		130			183			178			271
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,062			(578	)		(3,250	)		(4,643	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(1,283	)		(1,639	)		(583	)		(105	)
Accounts payable		156			429			2,234			1,000
Accrued expenses, other current liabilities and customer incentives and deposits		1,743			297			4,679			2,548
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,863			446			6,412			2,095

Investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment and capitalized software		(640	)		(732	)		(1,046	)		(1,153	)
Purchases of Brazil subsidiary, net of cash								–			(306	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(640	)		(732	)		(1,046	)		(1,459	)

Financing activities
Net (payments) borrowing on lines of credit		(608	)		635			(2,953	)		2,015
Proceeds from stock options exercised		7			3			8			22
Proceeds from local investors in Brazil								–			102
Payments on term debt		(289	)		(14	)		(543	)		(21	)
Payments on capital lease obligations		(7	)		–			(15	)		–
Purchase of treasury shares		(32	)		–			(121	)		(12	)
Distribution to non-controlling investors		(2,101	)		(286	)		(2,101	)		(286	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(3,030	)		338			(5,725	)		1,820

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash		792			(743	)		697			(672	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		985			(691	)		338			1,784
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		7,324			5,718			7,324			5,718
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	8,309		$	5,027		$	7,662		$	7,502

Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information
Interest paid	$	128		$	67		$	216		$	108
Income taxes paid	$	198		$	123
Income taxes paid							$	247		$	126
Increase in deferred tax asset due to adoption of ASU 2016-09 (Note 12)	$	65		$	–		$	65		$	-

	As of September 30, 2016									As of December 31, 2016
	As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(3,364	)	$	1,373		$	(1,991	)	$	(3,995	)	$	1,588		$	(2,407	)
Total SPAR Group, Inc. equity	$	18,572		$	1,373		$	19,945		$	18,089		$	1,588		$	19,677
Non-controlling interest	$	6,574		$	(1,373	)	$	5,201		$	6,993		$	(1,588	)	$	5,405

	As of June 30, 2016
	As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(3,570	)	$	1,479		$	(2,091	)
Total SPAR Group, Inc. equity	$	18,330		$	1,479		$	19,809
Non-controlling interest	$	6,028		$	(1,479	)	$	4,549

	As of September 30, 2016									As of December 31, 2016
	As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(3,364	)	$	1,373		$	(1,991	)	$	(3,995	)	$	1,588		$	(2,407	)
Total SPAR Group, Inc. equity	$	18,572		$	1,373		$	19,945		$	18,089		$	1,588		$	19,677
Non-controlling interest	$	6,574		$	(1,373	)	$	5,201		$	6,993		$	(1,588	)	$	5,405

	Three months ended June 30, 2016								Six months ended June 30, 2016								Three months ended September 30, 2016									Nine months ended September 30, 2016
	As Reported			Adjusted		As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted		As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted		As Revised

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest	$	(320	)	$	147	$	(173	)	$	(618	)	$	462	$	(156	)	$	(546	)	$	(105	)	$	(651	)	$	(1,164	)	$	357	$	(807	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	70		$	147	$	217		$	(558	)	$	462	$	(96	)	$	148		$	(105	)	$	43		$	(411	)	$	357	$	(54	)

PART I:	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Three months ended September 30, 2016									Nine months ended September 30, 2016								Twelve months ended December 31, 2016
	As Reported			Adjusted			As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted		As Revised			As Reported			Adjusted		As Revised

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest	$	(546	)	$	(105	)	$	(651	)	$	(1,164	)	$	357	$	(807	)	$	(1,583	)	$	572	$	(1,011	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	147		$	(105	)	$	42		$	(411	)	$	357	$	(54	)	$	(953	)	$	572	$	(381	)

	Twelve months ended December 31, 2016
	As Reported			Adjusted		As Revised

Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest	$	(1,583	)	$	572	$	(1,011	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	(953	)	$	572	$	(381	)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2017		2016			2017		2016
Numerator:
Net income attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.	$	343	$	283	$	99	$	143
Net income (loss) attributable to SPAR Group, Inc.									$	246	$	(58	)	$	346	$	84

Denominator:
Weighted average shares used in basic net income per share calculation		20,647		20,569		20,648		20,566		20,602		20,607			20,633		20,580

Weighted average shares used in diluted net income per share calculation		21,312		21,328		21,336		21,331		21,320		20,607			21,331		21,299

Basic and diluted net income per common share	$	0.02	$	0.01	$	0.00	$	0.01	$	0.01	$	–		$	0.02	$	–

	Interest Rate as of June 30, 2017		2017		2018		Interest Rate as of September 30, 2017			2017		2018
USA - Sterling National Bank		4.8%	$	8,100	$	–		4.8	%	$	–		5,720
Japan - Mizuho Bank		0.1%		13		6		0.1	%		7	$	4
Australia - Oxford Funding Pty Ltd.		6.4%		298		–		6.4	%		334		–
Brazil – Bradesco Bank		17.3%		266		–		17.3	%		157		–
Mexico - BBA Bancomer		11.5%		119		–
Total			$	8,796	$	6				$	498	$	5,724

	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Unused Availability:
United States	$	662	$	500
Unused Availability:
United States					$	3,280	$	500
Australia		624		688		606		688
Mexico		158		241		274		241
Brazil		454		–		475		–
Total Unused Availability	$	1,898	$	1,429	$	4,635	$	1,429

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Services provided by affiliates:
Field merchandiser and other expenses (SBS)	$	6,929	$	5,390	$	12,805	$	10,337
Field administration and other expenses (SAS)		1,055		989		2,129		2,127
Office and vehicle rental expenses (MPT)		16		12		32		24
Vehicle rental expenses (MCPT)		296		194		600		373
Office and vehicle rental expenses (MHT)		42		26		83		51
Consulting and administrative services (CON)		57		83		153		167
Legal Services (KMSA)		23		–		46		–
Warehousing rental (JFMD)		12		–		23		–

Total services provided by affiliates	$	8,430	$	6,694	$	15,871	$	13,079

	June 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Assets:
United States	$	22,416	$	22,189
International		33,246		32,662
Total assets	$	55,662	$	54,851

		Revenue				Net Loss
Consolidated supplemental pro forma for the six month period ended June 30, 2016		$	71,862			$	(10	)