UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019

OR

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission file number 000-29599

 PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(203) 324-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   ☒    No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes ☒    No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ☐    No ☒

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

 PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS: 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes   ☐    No   ☐ 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of August 8, 2018,May 10, 2019, there were 3,904,5783,921,910 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Note 1:Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) or (“Patriot”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries includingsubsidiary Patriot Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) (collectively, “Patriot”), have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) have been omitted. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included on the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.

The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 20172018 presented herein has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements.

On May 10, 2018 the Bank completed its acquisition of Prime Bank, a Connecticut bank headquartered in Orange, CT (“Prime Bank”). The closing of the transaction added a new Patriot branch located in the Town of Orange, New Haven County, Connecticut. The results of Prime Bank’s operations wereare included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of acquisition.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and to disclose contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management has identified accounting for the allowance for loan and lease losses, the analysis and valuation of its investment securities, the valuation of deferred tax assets, andaccounting for the business combination, and accounting for leases as certain of Patriot’s more significant accounting policies and estimates, in that they are critical to the presentation of Patriot’s financial condition and results of operations. As they concern matters that are inherently uncertain, these estimates require management to make subjective and complex judgments in the preparation of Patriot’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

The information furnished reflects, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the remainder of 2018.2019.

Note 2:     2:     Recent Accounting PoliciesPronouncements     

New Accounting Policy

Please refer to the summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a list of all policies in effect as of December 31, 2017. The below summary is intended to provide updates or new policies required as a result of a new accounting standard or a change to the Company’s operations or assets that require a new or amended policy.

Acquired Loans

Acquired loans are initially recorded at their acquisition date fair values. The carryover of allowance for loan losses is prohibited as any credit losses in the acquired loans are included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Fair values for acquired loans are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that involves assumptions and judgments as to credit risk, prepayment risk, liquidity risk, default rates, loss severity, payment speeds, collateral values and discount rate.

Acquired Impaired Loans- Purchase Credit Impaired “PCI” Loans

Acquired loans that exhibit evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination and for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are accounted for as PCI loans under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310-30. The excess of undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable discount and is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans using the interest method. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable discount. The non-accretable discount represents estimated future credit losses and other contractually required payments that the Company does not expect to collect. Subsequent decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairments through a charge to the provision for loan losses resulting in an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in a recovery of previously recorded allowance for loan losses or a reversal of a corresponding amount of the nonaccretable discount, which the Company then reclassifies as an accretable discount that is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans using the interest method.

PCI loans are initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, the associated allowance for credit losses related to these loans is not carried over at the acquisition date.

Acquired loans that met the criteria for non-accrual of interest prior to acquisition were not considered performing upon acquisition. When the customers resume payments, to make the nonaccrual loans current, the loans may return to accrual status, including the impact of any accretable discounts, if the Company can reasonably estimate the timing and amount of the expected cash flows on such loans and if the Company expects to fully collect the new carrying value of the loans.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

Acquired Non-impaired Loans

Acquired loans that do not meet the requirements under ASC 310-30 are considered acquired non-impaired loans. The difference between the acquisition date fair value and the outstanding balance represents the fair value adjustment for a loan and includes both credit and interest rate considerations. Fair value adjustments may be discounts (or premiums) to a loan’s cost basis and are accreted (or amortized) to net interest income (or expense) over the loan’s remaining life in accordance with ASC 310-20. Fair value adjustments for revolving loans are accreted (or amortized) using a straight line method. Term loans are accreted (or amortized) using the constant effective yield method.

Subsequent to the purchase date, the methods used to estimate the allowance for loan losses for the acquired non-impaired loans are consistent with the policy for allowance for loan losses described in Note 5.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include core deposit intangibles and goodwill arising from acquisitions. The initial and ongoing carrying value of intangible assets is based upon modeling techniques that require management to make estimates regarding the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. It also requires use of a discount rate that reflects the current return requirements of the market in relation to present risk-free interest rates, required equity market premiums, peer volatility indicators, and company-specific risk indicators.

Core deposit intangibles are amortized on straight-line basis over a 10-year period because that is managements’ conservative estimate of the period Patriot will benefit from Prime Bank’s stable deposit base comprised of funds associated with long term customer relationships.

The Company will evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. The annual impairment test will be conducted as of November annually. The implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to its carrying amount and the impairment loss is measured by the excess of the carrying value over fair value. The fair value of each reporting unit is compared to the carrying amount of such reporting unit in order to determine if impairment is indicated.

Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration represents an estimate of the additional amount of purchase price consideration and is measured based on the probability that certain loans are restructured in accordance with the agreement. Resolution of the contingent consideration will result in a cash payment and will be reflected in the financial statements as a measurement period adjustment as they are finalized. Changes will be recognized as an increase or decrease to goodwill, the valuation of the related loans and the contingent consideration/purchase price.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

New Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Adopted During 20182019

Effective January 1, 2018,2019, the following new Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) wereUpdate (ASU) was adopted by the Company:

ASU 2014-092016-02

ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) including subsequent ASUs issued to clarify this Topic. The ASU, and subsequent related updates, establish a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most previous revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The ASUs are intended to increase comparability across industries. The core principle of the revenue model is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers control of goods or services to customers, at an amount that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

The Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective transition approach. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, and there was no cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as no material changes were identified in the timing of revenue recognition.

ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03

ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10) - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, and ASU No. 2018-03, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10). The ASUs included targeted amendments in connection with the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The main provisions require investments in equity securities to be measured at fair value through net income, unless they qualify for a practical expedient, and require fair value changes arising from changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities that are measured under the fair value option to be recognized in other comprehensive income. The provisions also emphasized the existing requirement to use exit prices to measure fair value for disclosure purposes. The Company adopted the ASUs on January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018, we refined our methodology to estimate the fair value of our loan portfolio using an exit price notion resulting in prior-periods no longer being comparable.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

ASU 2016-15

In AugustFebruary 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. No. 2016-02, Leases. This ASU 2016-15 addresses the classification of certain specific transactions presented on the Statement of Cash Flows, in orderwas issued to improve consistency across entities. Debt prepayment or extinguishment, debt-instrument settlement, contingent consideration payments post-business combination,the financial reporting of leasing activities and beneficial interests in securitizationprovide a faithful representation of leasing transactions are specific items addressed by this ASU that may affect the Bank. Additionally, the ASU codifies the predominance principle for classifying separately identifiable cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. As of June 30, 2018, Patriot did not have any debt prepayment or extinguishment, debt-instrument settlement, contingent consideration payments post-business combination, and beneficial interests in securitization transactions. In the future, if Patriot’s such transactions warrant present, management does not envision any difficulties implementing the requirements of ASU 2016-15, as applicable.

ASU 2016-18

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows:Restricted Cash.The purpose of the standard is to improve consistencyunderstanding and comparability among companies with respect to the reporting of changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents on the Statement of Cash Flows. The ASU requires the Statement of Cash Flows to include all changes in total cash and cash equivalents, including restricted amounts, and to the extent restricted cash and cash equivalents are presented in separate line items on the Balance Sheet, disclosure reconciling the change in total cash and cash equivalents to the amounts shown on the Balance Sheet are required. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Patriot did not have restricted cash and cash equivalents separately disclosed on its Balance Sheet. In the future, if Patriot’s activities warrant presenting separate line items on its Balance Sheet for restricted cash and cash equivalents, management does not envision any difficulties implementing the requirements of ASU 2016-18, as applicable.

ASU 2017-09

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, which provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718 Stock compensation. The ASU is effective to all entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The Company does not anticipate this ASU will have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-04

ASU 2018-04 - Investments - Debt Securities (Topic 320) and Regulated Operations (Topic 980): The amendment in this ASU adds, amends and supersedes various paragraphs that contain SEC guidance in ASC 320, Investments-Debt Securities and ASC 980, Regulated Operations.lessee's financial statements. The amendments in this ASU arerequire lessees to recognize, on the balance sheet, assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases. Accounting by lessors will remain largely unchanged. In July 2018, the FASB issued a subsequent update which introduced a new transition method, under this new transition method, an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The guidance was effective when a registrant adopts ASU 2016-01, which for Patriot, wasthe Company on January 1, 2018. This amendment2019, with early adoption permitted. Management elected the transition practical expedient option. The cumulative-effect adjustment was an increase to the opening balance of accumulated deficit at the time of adoption on January 1, 2019. The Company recognized $3.4 million of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and $3.4 million lease liabilities for operating leases on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The standard did not have an impact on the Company’sits Consolidated FinancialIncome Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

ASU 2016-02

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. This ASU was issued to improve the financial reporting of leasing activities and provide a faithful representation of leasing transactions and improve understanding and comparability of a lessee's financial statements. Under the new accounting guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. This ASU will require both finance and operating leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. This ASU will affect all companies and organizations that lease real estate. The FASB issued an update in January 2018 (ASU 2018-01) providing an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under Topic 842 land easements that exist or expired before the entity's adoption of Topic 842. This ASU will become effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company will adopt this new accounting guidance as required. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2016-13 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU changes the methodology for measuring credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost to a current expected loss (“CECL”) model. Under the CECL model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of a financial instrument from the date of initial recognition of the instrument. The ASU also changes the existing impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. In cases where there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell the debt security, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a direct write-down of the amortized cost basis. Additionally, ASU 2016-13 notes that credit losses related to available-for-sale debt securities and purchased credit impaired loans should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2017-04

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment: The objective of this guidance is to simplify an entity’s required test for impairment of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In Step 2 an entity measured a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill, an entity had to determine the fair value at the impairment date of its assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized assets and liabilities, following a procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Under this Update, an entity should perform its annual or quarterly goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying amount over the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit and the entity must consider the income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. This guidance is effective for a public business entity that is an SEC filer for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

ASU 2017-08

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium, shortening such period to the earliest call date. The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Earlier application is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the ASU in an interim period, any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-08 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2017-12

"Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities." ASU 2018-022017-12 was issued to ease the burden associated with assessing hedge effectiveness and to promote better financial statement alignment of the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. This guidance requires entities to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the same income statement line item with the earnings effect on the hedged item. In October 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-16, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financial Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes." ASU 2018-16 was issued to expand the list of benchmark interest rates for hedge accounting. The effective date for the amendment is the same as the effective date for ASU 2017-12. For public business entities, ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2017-12 and ASU 2018-16 are not expected to have any impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-13

In FebruaryAugust 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, IncomeNo. 2018-13, Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeFair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which allows a reclassification from accumulatedto modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. This ASU removes requirements to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the policy for timing of transfers between levels and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 clarifies that disclosure regarding measurement uncertainty is intended to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. ASU 2018-13 adds certain disclosure requirements, including disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting fromrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Consequently, the amendments eliminated the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. The amendments only relate to the reclassificationend of the income tax effectsreporting period and the range and weighted average of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not effected.significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this update also require certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. The guidance in this ASU will becomeare effective for reportingannual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted,2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and willlosses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied either in the period of adoption orprospectively, while all other amendments should be applied retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized.for all periods presented upon their effective date. Management is currently evaluating the impact thatof adopting the standard will havenew guidance on itsthe Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-05

ASU 2018-05 - Income Taxes (Topic 740): AmendmentStatements, but it is not expected to clarify situations wherehave a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting under ASC 740 for certain income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for the reporting period. As of December 31, 2017, the Company partially completed the accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and management made reasonable estimates of the effects of a reduced federal corporate income tax rate on its existing deferred tax balances. The Company will continue to make and refine its calculations during the one-year re-measurement period as additional analysis is completed. In addition, these estimates may be affected as management gains a more thorough understanding of the new tax reform legislation.material impact.

Note 3:     Business Combinations

Generally, acquisitions are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Both the purchased assets and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding fair values becomes available.

Acquisition of Prime Bank

On May 10, 2018 the Company completed its acquisition of Prime Bank, a Connecticut bank headquartered in Orange, CT. The closing of the transaction added a new Patriot branch located in the Town of Orange, New Haven County, Connecticut. On the acquisition date, Prime Bank had assets with a carrying value of approximately $65 million, including investment securities with a carrying value of $36 million, loans outstanding with a carrying value of approximately $23 million, as well as deposits with a carrying value of approximately $46 million. The results of Prime Bank’s operations were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income from the date of acquisition.

The acquisition will enable Patriot to expand its consumer and small business relationships, lending operations, and community presence, all of which will improve key operating metrics. The goodwill recognized results from the expected synergies and potential earnings from this combination, including some future cost savings related to the operations of Prime Bank. Patriot incurred $383,000 acquisition costs, charged to operations in the first half of 2018.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Prime Bank were recorded at their fair value as of the closing date of the merger. Goodwill of $2.1 million was recorded at the time of the acquisition. The goodwill is all deductible for income taxes over 15 years.

Patriot engaged independent consultants recognized as experts in the field of valuations and fair value measurements for acquisition and merger transactions. Fair values were defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.”

Loans were evaluated on an individual basis, considering the loan's underlying characteristics, types, remaining terms, annual interest rates, current market rates, loan to value ratios (LTV), loss exposure and remaining balances. The independent consultants utilized a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the loans using assumptions for probability of defaults, loss given defaults / recovery rates and foreclosure / recovery lags. ASC 310-30 Purchase Credit Impaired Loans were separately addressed with specific discount rates adjusted for an illiquidity premium.

To estimate the core deposit customer relationships intangible the consultants first identified the core deposits and utilized assumptions regarding the account retention rate, growth rate and float and reserve percentages. Retention rates were based on historical attrition rates based on previous transactions, the growth rate assumed no new accounts, and 3% increase in existing account balances, while the floats and reserve percentage assumed the market participant would most likely be subject to a reserve requirement given the current level of core deposits.

The fair value of time deposits included segmenting into certificate of deposits (“CDs”) and IRA CDs and CDs less than $100,000 and those $100,000 and above. The methodology entailed discounting the contractual cash flows of the instruments over their remaining contractual lives at prevailing market rates.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the consideration paid by the Company in the merger with Prime Bank and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date:

All securities acquired in the transaction with Prime Bank were sold at the fair value at acquisition date with no recorded gain or loss. Fair value adjustments to assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be amortized on a straight-line basis over periods consistent with the average life, useful life/ or contractual term of related assets and liabilities. The core deposit intangible will be amortized over a 10-year period using the straight-line method.

Under the terms of the agreement, the transaction is accounted for as an asset sale. As a result, tax basis to Prime Bank is not carried over to Patriot and deferred tax assets on Prime Bank’s books have been written off as part of the purchase accounting adjustments.

The cash consideration is based on the initial calculation of Prime Bank tangible book value in accordance with the agreement.  The initial cash payment made totaled $5.89 million and $1.0 million of this amount remains with the escrow agent pending resolution of the final closing tangible book value calculation.  

Pursuant to a letter agreement, Patriot will make an additional payment (contingent consideration) with the amount to be determined based on the curing of certain loan deficiencies.  The maximum amount payable under the letter agreement is $2.858 million and the liability under the agreement is currently estimated to be $1.761 million.  This estimate has been measured based on Patriot's assessment of the probability that certain loans are cured in accordance with the agreement.

The initial accounting for the business combination includes certain provisional amounts associated with the resolution of the purchase price consideration noted above.  In addition, certain other provisional amounts have been included in the determination of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities and changes to those underlying estimates will be reflected as measurement period adjustments within the one-year measurement period.  Those provisional amounts relate to the valuation of loans, other real estate owned, deposits, tax and other accrued liabilities of the acquired company.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

Pending Acquisition

Definitive Purchase Agreement

On February 6, 2018, the Company, Hana Small Business Lending, Inc. (“Hana SBL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hana Financial, Inc. (“Hana Financial”), and three wholly-owned subsidiaries of Hana SBL entered into a definitive purchase agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which Patriot will acquire Hana SBL's small business administration (“SBA”) lending business.

Hana SBL is a fully integrated national SBA origination and servicing platform. It has originated nearly $1 billion of SBA 7(a) loans since its inception in 2006.

The transaction includes the purchase of approximately $120 million of SBA 7(a) loans and servicing rights relating to a pool of $370 million in loans, and the assumption of two loan securitization vehicles, currently rated “AA+” (Hana SBL Loan Trust 2014) and “A-” (Hana SBL Loan Trust 2016) by Standard and Poor’s. Total cash consideration is approximately $83 million with the assumption of approximately $41 million of liabilities. The transaction is subject to the satisfactory completion of certain due diligence requirements, purchase price adjustments at closing and the receipt of required governmental and regulatory approvals.

On August 2, 2018, the Company, Hana SBL and three wholly-owned subsidiaries of Hana SBL, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment, the closing date of the above referenced transaction has been extended from August 2, 2018 to August 1, 2019.

As a result of the proximity of the definitive purchase to the date these consolidated financial statements are being issued, Patriot is still evaluating the estimated fair values of the assets to be acquired and the liabilities to be assumed. Accordingly, the amount of any goodwill and other intangible assets to be recognized in the connection with this transaction, as well as acquisition costs incurred and expected to be incurred, are also yet to be determined. The Company incurred $313,000 of merger and acquisition expenses related to the Hana SBL acquisition for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Due to the proximity of the announced amendment the Company is now in process of determining the costs to be incurred under the amended agreement.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to consolidated financial statements (Unaudited)

Note 43: Available-for-Available-for Sale Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, andgross unrealized losses and approximate fair values of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and December 31, 20172018 are as follows: