The ~~following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common~~ acronyms and ~~terms~~abbreviations identified in alphabetical order below are used throughout ~~the document:~~this Report on Form 10-Q:

~~Stock Yards Bancorp, inc. and subsidiary~~PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

For the three and sixmonths ended June 30, 2020 and 2019(in thousands, except per share data)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019(in thousands)

Table of Contents

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)~~

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except per share data)

~~For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018~~

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

Net income
$ 16,543 $ 13,579 $ 32,184 $ 26,983
Other comprehensive income:

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale debt securities
5,021 (1,618 ) 8,446 (6,325 )
Change in fair value of derivatives used in cash flow hedges
(321 ) 99 (530 ) 491
Total other comprehensive income (loss), before income tax
4,700 (1,519 ) 7,916 (5,834 )
Tax effect
1,121 (319 ) 1,708 (1,226 )
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
3,579 (1,200 ) 6,208 (4,608 )
Comprehensive income
$ 20,122 $ 12,379 $ 38,392 $ 22,375

													Accumulated
	Common stock						Additional						other		Total
	*Shares*						*paid-in*			*Retained*			*comprehensive*		*stockholders'*
	*outstanding*			*Amount*			*capital*			*earnings*			*income*		*Total*

Balance, January 1, 2020		22,604		$	36,207		$	35,714		$	333,699		$	677	$	406,297

Activity for three months ended March 31, 2020:
Impact of adoption of ASC 326		—			—			—			(8,823	)		—		(8,823	)
Net income		—			—			—			13,232			—		13,232
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			5,775		5,775
Stock compensation expense		—			—			817			—			—		817
Stock issued for share-based awards, net of withholdings to satisfy employee tax obligations		62			203			1,858			(3,546	)		—		(1,485	)
Cash dividends declared, $0.27 per share		—			—			—			(6,111	)		—		(6,111	)
Shares cancelled		(1	)		(2	)		(22	)		24			—		—

Balance, March 31, 2020		22,665		$	36,408		$	38,367		$	328,475		$	6,452	$	409,702

Activity for three months ended June 30, 2020:
Net income		—			—			—			13,368			—		13,368
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			2,364		2,364
Stock compensation expense		—			—			976			—			—		976
Stock issued for share-based awards, net of withholdings to satisfy employee tax obligations		2			8			96			(163	)		—		(59	)
Cash dividends declared, $0.27 per share		—			—			—			(6,120	)		—		(6,120	)
Shares cancelled		—			(1	)		(14	)		15			—		—
Balance, June 30, 2020		22,667		$	36,415		$	39,425		$	335,575		$	8,816	$	420,231

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)~~

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019(in thousands)

~~For the six months ended June 30, 2019 with quarterly subtotals~~

Accumulated

Common stock

Additional

other

Total

Number of

paid-in

Retained

comprehensive

stockholders'

(In thousands, except per share data)

shares

Amount

capital

earnings

income (loss)

equity

Balance, January 1, 2019
22,749 $ 36,689 $ 36,797 $ 298,156 $ (5,142 ) $ 366,500

Activity for three months ended March 31, 2019:

Net income
— — — 15,641 — 15,641

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
— — — — 2,629 2,629

Stock compensation expense
— — 863 — — 863

Stock issued for share-based awards, net of withholdings to satisfy employee tax obligations upon award
74 245 2,254 (4,452 ) — (1,953 )

Cash dividends declared, $0.25 per share
— — — (5,686 ) — (5,686 )

Balance, March 31, 2019
22,823 $ 36,934 $ 39,914 $ 303,659 $ (2,513 ) $ 377,994

Activity for three months ended June 30, 2019:

Net income
— — — 16,543 — 16,543

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
— — — — 3,579 3,579

Stock compensation expense
— — 993 — — 993

Common stock repurchased
(107 ) (357 ) (3,308 ) — — (3,665 )

Stock issued for share-based awards, net of withholdings to satisfy employee tax obligations upon award
5 19 182 (363 ) — (162 )

Cash dividends declared, $0.26 per share
— — — (5,917 ) — (5,917 )

Shares cancelled
— — (5 ) 5 — —

Balance, June 30, 2019
22,721 $ 36,596 $ 37,776 $ 313,927 $ 1,066 $ 389,365

	2020			2019
Operating activities:
Net income	$	26,600		$	32,184
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses		11,100			600
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net		2,815			1,679
Deferred income tax benefit		(1,947	)		(3,959	)
Gain on sales of mortgage loans held for sale		(2,593	)		(719	)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale		(103,509	)		(38,081	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		97,486			36,553
Bank owned life insurance income		(355	)		(362	)
(Gain)/loss on the disposal of premises and equipment		(209	)		6
Gain on the sale of other real estate owned		—			(63	)
Stock compensation expense		1,793			1,856
Excess tax (benefit) expense from share-based compensation arrangements		3			(392	)
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(14,245	)		(3,429	)
Net change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		11,741			(3,974	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		28,680			21,899
Investing activities:
Purchases of available for sale debt securities		(192,713	)		(373,761	)
Proceeds from sales of acquired available for sale debt securities		—			12,427
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of available for sale debt securities		189,047			396,367
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			591
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Reserve Bank stock		—			490
Proceeds from redemption of interest bearing due from banks		—			1,761
Net change in traditional loans		12,616			(49,280	)
Net change in PPP loans		(630,082	)		—
Purchases of premises and equipment		(2,526	)		(3,321	)
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment		1,222			45
Proceeds from surrender of acquired bank owned life insurance		—			3,431
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance mortality benefit		—			909
Other investment activities		(646	)		(1,532	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		—			868
Cash for acquisition, net of cash acquired		—			(24,684	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(623,082	)		(35,689	)
Financing activities:
Net change in deposits		593,179			(36,464	)
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		8,341			(2,086	)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		60,000			60,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(78,629	)		(67,250	)
Repayment of acquired bank holding company line of credit		—			(2,300	)
Redemption of acquired bank subordinated debentures		—			(3,609	)
Repurchase of common stock		—			(3,665	)
Share repurchases related to compensation plans		(1,544	)		(2,115	)
Cash dividends paid		(12,275	)		(11,621	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		569,072			(69,110	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(25,330	)		(82,900	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		249,724			198,939
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	224,394		$	116,039

~~See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.~~

(continued)

Table of Contents

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)~~

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) (continued)

For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019(in thousands)

~~For the six months ended June 30, 2018 with quarterly subtotals~~

Accumulated

Common stock

Additional

other

Total

Number of

paid-in

Retained

comprehensive

stockholders'

(In thousands, except per share data)

shares

Amount

capital

earnings

loss

Total

Balance, January 1, 2018
22,679 $ 36,457 $ 31,924 $ 267,193 $ (1,930 ) $ 333,644

Activity for three months ended March 31, 2018:

Net income
— — — 13,404 — 13,404

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive loss
— — — — (3,408 ) (3,408 )

Reclassification adjustment under Accounting Standards Update 2018-02
— — — 506 (506 ) —

Stock compensation expense
— — 823 — — 823

Stock issued for share-based awards, net of withholdings to satisfy employee tax obligations upon award
52 174 205 (1,914 ) — (1,535 )

Cash dividends declared, $0.23 per share
— — — (5,226 ) — (5,226 )

Shares cancelled
(1 ) (4 ) (35 ) 39 — —

Balance, March 31, 2018
22,730 $ 36,627 $ 32,917 $ 274,002 $ (5,844 ) $ 337,702

Activity for three months ended June 30, 2018:

Net income
— — — 13,579 — 13,579

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive loss
— — — — (1,200 ) (1,200 )

Stock compensation expense
— — 1,212 — — 1,212

Repurchase of common stock
— — — — — —

Stock issued for share-based awards, net of withholdings to satisfy employee tax obligations upon award
17 57 618 (1,226 ) — (551 )

Cash dividends declared, $0.23 per share
— — — (5,227 ) — (5,227 )

Shares cancelled
(1 ) (4 ) (32 ) 36 — —

Balance, June 30, 2018
22,746 $ 36,680 $ 34,715 $ 281,164 $ (7,044 ) $ 345,515

	2020		2019
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	7,583	$	5,382
Income taxes paid, net of refunds		418		11,320
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities		790		694
Supplemental non-cash activity:
Unfunded commitments in tax credit investments	$	5,503	$	3,477
Initial recognition of right-of-use lease assets		—		16,747
Initial recognition operating lease liabilities		—		18,067
Loans transferred to OREO		—		—

Liabilities assumed in conjunction with acquisition
Fair value of assets acquired	$	—	$	204,613
Cash paid in acquisition		—		28,000
Liabilities assumed	$	—	$	176,613

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASHFLOWS (Unaudited)~~
~~For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018~~

(In thousands)
2019 2018
Operating activities:

Net income
$ 32,184 $ 26,983
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for loan and lease losses
600 1,970
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net
1,679 2,680
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
(3,959 ) 40
Gain on sales of mortgage loans held for sale
(719 ) (769 )
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale
(38,081 ) (37,803 )
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
36,553 39,483
Bank owned life insurance income
(362 ) (378 )
Loss (gain) on the disposal of premises and equipment
6 (14 )
Gain on the sale of other real estate
(63 ) (109 )
Stock compensation expense
1,856 2,035
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
(392 ) (525 )
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets
(3,429 ) 2,236
Net change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
(3,974 ) 247
Net cash provided by operating activities
21,899 36,076
Investing activities:

Purchases of securities available for sale
(373,761 ) (399,911 )
Proceeds from sales of securities
12,427 —
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities available for sale
396,367 392,855
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
— (2,724 )
Proceeds from redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
591 —
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Reserve Bank stock
490 —
Proceeds from redemption of interest bearing due from banks
1,761 —
Net change in loans
(49,280 ) (170,843 )
Purchases of premises and equipment
(3,321 ) (2,694 )
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment
45 230
Proceeds from surrender of acquired bank bank owned life insurance
3,431 —
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance mortality benefit
909 —
Other investment activities
(1,532 ) (2,542 )
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
868 2,860
Cash for acquisition, net of cash acquired
(24,684 ) —
Net cash used in investing activities
(35,689 ) (182,769 )
Financing activities:

Net change in deposits
(36,464 ) (37,834 )
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased
(2,086 ) 113,443
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
60,000 60,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(67,250 ) (60,637 )
Repayment of acquired bank holding company line of credit
(2,300 ) —
Redemption of acquired bank subordinated debentures
(3,609 ) —
Common stock repurchases
(5,780 ) (2,086 )
Cash dividends paid
(11,621 ) (10,441 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(69,110 ) 62,445
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(82,900 ) (84,248 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
198,939 139,248
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 116,039 $ 55,000

~~(continued)~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASHFLOWS (continued) (Unaudited)~~
~~For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018~~

(In thousands)
2019 2018
Supplemental cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

Income tax payments, net of refunds
$ 5,382 $ 1,800
Cash paid for interest
11,320 5,497
Supplemental non-cash activity:

Initital recognition of right-of-use lease assets
$ 16,747 $ —
Initital recognition operating lease liabilities
18,067 —
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired in settlement of loans
— 471

Liabilities assumed in conjunction with King Bancorp acquisition:

Fair value of assets acquired
$ 204,613 $ —
Cash paid in acqusition
28,000 —
Liabilities assumed
$ 176,613 $ —

~~See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~NOTES~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(1)

Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

~~Basis~~Nature of ~~Presentation~~Operations – Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp” or “the Company”) is a FHC headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ~~Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.~~its wholly owned subsidiary, SYB (“~~Holding Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company (“Bank”)~~the Bank). ~~All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated~~Established in ~~consolidation. All companies are collectively referred to as “Bancorp” or the “Company.”~~

~~As a result of its acquisition of King, Bancorp, Inc. on~~ ~~May 1, 2019,~~ ~~Bancorp became the~~ ~~100%~~ successor owner of King Bancorp Statutory Trust I (“KBST”), an unconsolidated finance subsidiary. As permitted under the terms of KBST’s governing documents, Bancorp redeemed the trust-preferred securities at the par amount of approximately ~~$3.6~~ ~~million on~~ ~~June 17, 2019.~~

~~The Bank, chartered in~~ 1904, SYB is a ~~Louisville, Kentucky-based,~~ state-chartered non-member financial institution that provides services in the Louisville, Kentucky, Indianapolis, Indiana and Cincinnati, Ohio ~~Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSAs”)~~MSAs through 4243 full service banking center locations.

As a result of its acquisition on May 1, 2019, Bancorp became the 100% successor owner of KBST, an unconsolidated finance subsidiary. As permitted under the terms of the governing documents, Bancorp redeemed the TPS at the par amount of approximately $4 million in June 2019.

~~As of~~ ~~June 30, 2019,~~ Bancorp ~~was~~is divided into two reportable segments: Commercial Banking and ~~Wealth Management & Trust (“~~WM~~&T”):~~&T:

Commercial Banking provides a full range of loan and deposit products to individual consumers and businesses in all its markets through ~~commercial lending,~~ retail lending, mortgage banking, deposit services, ~~treasury management services, private banking,~~ online banking, mobile banking, private banking, commercial lending, treasury management services, merchant services, international banking, correspondent banking and other banking services. The Bank also offers securities brokerage services via its banking center network through an arrangement with a third party ~~broker-dealer.~~ broker-dealer in the Commercial Banking segment.

WM&T ~~with over~~ $3 ~~billion in assets under management (“AUM”),~~ provides custom-tailored financial planning, investment management, company retirement plan management, retirement planning, ~~and~~ trust and estate services in all markets in which Bancorp operates. The magnitude of WM&T revenue distinguishes Bancorp from other community banks of similar asset size.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ~~U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)~~GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. Operating results for the three and six ~~months~~ month periods ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,2020.~~2019.~~ ~~For further information, refer~~

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Certain accounting estimates are important to the portrayal of Bancorp’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the economy, including pandemic-related changes, and changes in the financial condition of borrowers.

Bancorp’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition. At December 31, 2019, the significant accounting policy considered the most critical in preparing Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements is the determination of the ACL on loans. See the section titled “Critical Accounting Policies and ~~notes thereto included~~Estimates” in Bancorp’s2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for ~~the year ended~~additional detail.

On January 1, 2020, Bancorp adopted ASC 326 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,” which created material changes to Bancorp’s existing critical accounting policy that existed at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Effective ~~Certain reclassifications have been made~~January 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020, the significant accounting policy considered the most critical in preparing Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements is the determination of the ACL on loans.

The ACL on loans is established through credit loss expense charged to current earnings. The amount maintained in the ~~prior year financial statements~~ACL reflects management’s estimate of the net amount not expected to ~~conform~~be collected on the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The ACL is comprised of specific reserves assigned to certain loans that do not share general risk characteristics and general reserves on pools of loans that do share general risk characteristics. Factors contributing to the determination of specific reserves include the creditworthiness of the borrower and more specifically, changes in the expected future receipt of principal and interest payments and/or in the value of pledged collateral. A reserve is recorded when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the discounted estimated cash flows using the loan’s initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral-dependent loans. For purposes of establishing the general reserve, Bancorp stratifies the loan portfolio into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss potential characteristics and calculates the net amount expected to be collected over the life of the loans to estimate the credit losses in the loan portfolio. Bancorp’s methodologies for estimating the ACL on loans consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current ~~year classifications.~~conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

Table of Contents

Significant Accounting Policies -– In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of related revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A description of significant accounting policies is presented in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Debt Securities–Bancorp determines the classification of debt securities at the time of purchase. Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and recorded at amortized cost. Debt securities not classified as held to maturity are classified as AFS and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in AOCI, net of tax. All debt securities were classified as AFS at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific-identification method. Amortization of premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income over the period to maturity using the interest method, except for premiums on callable debt securities, which are amortized to their earliest call date.

Bancorp has made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis of debt securities and reports accrued interest separately in the consolidated balance sheets. A debt security is placed on non-accrual status at the time any principal or interest payments become more than 90 days delinquent or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. Accrued interest for a security placed on non-accrual is reversed against interest income. There was no accrued interest related to AFS debt securities reversed against interest income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

~~Critical~~ACL – AFSDebt Securities ~~Accounting Policies~~– ~~- An allowance has been established~~For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, Bancorp evaluates the securities to ~~provide~~determine whether the decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis (impairment) is due to credit-related factors or non-credit related factors. Any impairment that is not credit-related is recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Credit-related impairment is recognized as an a ACL on AFS debt securities on the balance sheet, limited to the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. Both the ACL and the adjustment to net income may be reversed if conditions change. However, if Bancorp intends to sell an impaired AFS debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell such a security before recovering its amortized cost basis, the entire impairment amount would be recognized in earnings with a corresponding adjustment to the security’s amortized cost basis. Because the security’s amortized cost basis is adjusted to fair value, there is no ACL in this situation.

In evaluating AFS debt securities in unrealized loss positions for ~~probable~~impairment and the criteria regarding its intent or requirement to sell such securities, Bancorp considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuers’ financial condition, among other factors. There were no credit related factors underlying unrealized losses on ~~loans~~AFS debt securities at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Changes in the ACL on AFS debt securities are recorded as expense. Losses are charged against the ACL when management believes the uncollectability of an AFS debt security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.

Loans–Loans that ~~may~~ ~~not~~ ~~be fully repaid. The allowance~~management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at amortized cost basis, which is ~~increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs,~~the unpaid principal balance outstanding, net of ~~recoveries. Loans are typically charged off when management deems them uncollectible~~unearned income, deferred loan fees and ~~after underlying collateral~~costs, premiums and discounts associated with acquisition date fair value adjustments on acquired loans and any direct partial charge-offs. Bancorp has ~~been liquidated; however, collection efforts continue~~made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis of loans and ~~future recoveries~~ ~~may~~ ~~occur. Periodically, loans are partially charged off to~~report accrued interest separately from the ~~net realizable value based upon evaluation of~~ related ~~underlying collateral, including Bancorp’s expectation of resolution.~~loan balance in the consolidated balance sheets.

Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan without anticipating prepayments.

11
12

Table of Contents

~~The allowance methodology is driven by risk ratings, historical losses, and qualitative factors. The level~~Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal and/or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment. Loans are classified as non-accrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. The accrual of interest income on loans is typically discontinued at the time the loan is ~~June 30, 2019~~ 90~~allowance reflected~~ days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection, or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. All interest accrued but not received for a ~~number~~loan placed on non-accrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Under the cost-recovery method, interest income is not recognized until the loan balance is reduced to zero. Under the cash-basis method, interest income is recorded when the payment is received in cash. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Acquired loans are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition based on a DCF methodology that considers various factors including ~~credit quality metrics which were generally consistent with prior periods,~~the type of loan and ~~expansion~~related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of ~~the historical look-back period from~~ 32 to 36 ~~quarters in~~ ~~March~~ of ~~2019.~~ ~~This expansion of the historical period was applied to all classes~~loan and segments of the portfolio. Expansion of the look-back period for historical loss rates used in the quantitative allocation caused review of the overall methodology for qualitative factors to ensure we were appropriately capturing riskwhether or not ~~addressed in~~ the ~~quantitative historical loss rate. Management believes extension of the look-back period is appropriate to ensure capture of the impact of~~loan was amortizing, and a ~~full economic cycle and more accurately represents the current level~~discount rate reflecting Bancorp’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Certain larger purchased loans are individually evaluated while certain purchased loans are grouped together according to similar risk characteristics and are treated in aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective, as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

Prior to January 1, 2020, loans acquired in a business combination that had evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and for which it was probable, at acquisition, that Bancorp would be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable were considered PCI. PCI loans were individually evaluated and recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition with no initial ACL based on a DCF methodology that considered various factors including the type of loan ~~portfolio. Based~~and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting Bancorp’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. The difference between the DCFs expected at acquisition and the investment in the loan, or the “accretable yield,” was recognized as interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loan. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the DCFs expected at acquisition, or the “non-accretable difference,” were not recognized on the ~~look-back period extension, the allowance level increased approximately $2.0 million for~~balance sheet and did ~~2019.~~not ~~Key indicators of loan quality continued to trend at levels consistent with prior periods, however management recognizes that due~~result in any yield adjustments, loss accruals or valuation allowances. Increases in expected cash flows, including prepayments, subsequent to the ~~cyclical~~initial investment were recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loan over its remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows were recognized as impairment. ACLs on PCI loans reflected only losses incurred post-acquisition (meaning the PV of all cash flows expected at acquisition that ultimately were not to be received).

Subsequent to January 1, 2020, loans acquired in a business combination that have experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination are considered PCD loans. At the acquisition date, an estimate of expected credit losses is made for groups of PCD loans with similar risk characteristics and individual PCD loans without similar risk characteristics. This initial ACL is allocated to individual PCD loans and added to the purchase price or acquisition date fair values to establish the initial amortized cost basis of the PCD loans. As the initial ACL is added to the purchase price, there is no credit loss expense recognized upon acquisition of a PCD loan. Any difference between the unpaid principal balance of PCD loans and the amortized cost basis is considered to relate to non-credit factors and results in a discount or premium. Discounts and premiums are recognized through interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans. Approximately $1.6 million in PCI loans were converted to PCD on January 1, 2020.

For acquired loans not deemed PCD at acquisition, the differences between the initial fair value and the unpaid principal balance are recognized as interest income on a level-yield basis over the lives of the related loans. At the acquisition date, an initial ACL on loans is estimated and recorded as credit loss expense.

The subsequent measurement of expected credit losses for all acquired loans is the same as the subsequent measurement of expected credit losses for originated loans.

ACL – Loans – Under the current CECL model, the ACL on loans represents a valuation allowance estimated at each balance sheet date in accordance with GAAP that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loan portfolio.

Bancorp estimates the ACL on loans based on the underlying assets’ amortized cost basis, which is the amount at which the receivable is originated or acquired, adjusted for applicable accretion or amortization of premium, discount, and net deferred fees or costs, collection of payment, and charge-offs. In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, Bancorp has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner. Therefore, Bancorp has made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of ACL.

Table of Contents

Expected credit losses are reflected in the ACL through a charge to provision. When Bancorp deems all or a portion of a financial asset to be uncollectible, the appropriate amount is written-off and the ACL is reduced by the same amount. Bancorp applies judgment to determine when a financial asset is deemed uncollectible; however, generally speaking, an asset will be considered uncollectible no later than when all efforts at collection have been exhausted and the collateral, if any, has been liquidated. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ACL when received.

Bancorp’s methodologies for estimating the ACL consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The methodologies apply historical loss information, adjusted for asset-specific characteristics, economic conditions at the measurement date, and forecasts about future economic conditions expected to exist through the contractual lives of the financial assets that are reasonable and supportable, to the identified pools of financial assets with similar risk characteristics for which the historical loss experience was observed. Bancorp’s methodologies may revert to historical loss information on a straight-line basis over a number quarters when it can no longer develop reasonable and supportable forecasts.

Loans are predominantly segmented by FDIC Call Report Codes into loan pools that have similar risk characteristics, similar collateral type and are assumed to pose consistent risk of loss to Bancorp. Bancorp has identified the following pools of financial assets with similar risk characteristics for measuring expected credit losses:

Commercial real estate – owner occupied – Includes non-farm non-residential real estate loans for a variety of commercial property types and purposes, and is typically secured by commercial office or industrial buildings, warehouses or retail buildings where the owner of the building occupies the property. The primary source of repayment is the cash flow from the ongoing operations and activities conducted by the party (or affiliate) who owns the property. Repayment terms vary considerably; interest rates are fixed or variable and are structured for full, partial, or no amortization of principal.

Commercial real estate – non-owner occupied – Includes investment real estate loans secured by similar collateral as above. The primary source of income for this loan type is typically rental income associated with the property. These loans generally involve a greater degree of credit risk, as these borrowers are more sensitive to adverse economic conditions. This category also includes apartment or multifamily residential buildings (secured by five or more dwelling units).

Construction and land development — Consists of loans to finance the ground up construction, improvement and/or carrying for sale after the completion of construction of owner occupied and non-owner occupied residential and commercial properties and loans secured by raw or improved land. The repayment of C&D loans is generally dependent upon the successful completion of the improvements by the builder for the end user, the leasing of the property, or sale of the property to a third party. Repayment of land secured loans are dependent upon the successful development and sale of the property, the sale of the land as is, or the outside cash flow of the owners to support the retirement of the debt. Bancorp’s construction loans may convert to real estate-secured once construction is completed or principal amortization payments begin, assuming the borrower retains financing with the Bank.

Commercialand Industrial — Represents loans for C&I purposes to sole proprietorships, partnerships, corporations and other business enterprises, where secured (other than those that meet the definition of a “loan secured by real estate”) or unsecured, single payment or installment. This category includes loans originated for financing capital expenditures, non-real estate loans guaranteed by the SBA and non-real estate related construction loans in addition to loans secured by accounts receivable, inventory and other business assets such as equipment. Bancorp originates these loans for a variety of purposes across a various industries. This category also includes loans to commercial banks in the U.S. This portfolio has been segregated between term loans and revolving lines of credits based on the varied characteristics of these individual loan structures.

Residential real estate— Includes non-revolving (closed-end) first and junior liens secured by residential real estate primarily in Bancorp’s market areas. This portfolio has been segregated between owner occupied and non-owner occupied status, as the investment nature of the ~~lending~~latter poses additional credit risks to Bancorp.

Table of Contents

Home equity lines of credit – Similar to the above, however these are revolving (open-ended) lines of credit that predominantly represent junior liens.

Consumer — Represents loans to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures that may be secured or unsecured. This includes pre-arranged overdraft plans, secured automobile loans and other consumer-purposed loans.

Leases— Represents a variety of leasing options to businesses to acquire equipment.

Commercial Credit Cards — Represents revolving loans to businesses to manage operating cash flows.

Bancorp measures expected credit losses for its loan portfolio segments as follows:

Loan Portfolio Segment		ACL Methodology

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied		Discounted cash flow
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		Discounted cash flow
Commercial and industrial - term		Static pool
Commercial and industrial - line of credit		Static pool
Residential real estate - owner occupied		Discounted cash flow
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		Discounted cash flow
Construction and land development		Static pool
Home equity lines of credit		Static pool
Consumer		Static pool
Leases		Static pool
Credit cards - commercial		Static pool

Discounted Cash flowMethod – The DCF methodology is used to develop cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speeds, curtailments, time to recovery, probability of default and loss given default. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds, curtailment rates and time to recovery are based on historical internal data.

Bancorp uses regression analysis of historical internal and peer data to determine suitable loss drivers to utilize when modeling lifetime probability of default and loss given default. This analysis also determines how expected probability of default and loss given default will react to forecasted levels of the loss drivers. For all loan pools utilizing the DCF method, management utilizes the forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate as its primary loss driver, as this was determined to best correlate to historical losses.

With regard to the DCF model and the adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020, management determined that four quarters represented a reasonable and supportable forecast period with reversion back to a historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis.

The combination of adjustments for credit expectations (default and loss) and timing expectations (prepayment, curtailment, and time to recovery) produces an expected cash flow stream at the instrument level. Instrument effective yield is calculated, net of the impacts of prepayment assumptions and the instrument expected cash flows are then discounted at that effective yield to produce an instrument-level NPV of expected cash flows. An ACL is established for the difference between the instrument’s NPV and amortized cost basis.

Static Pool Method – The static pool methodology is utilized for the loan portfolio segments that typically have shorter durations. For each of these loan segments, Bancorp applies an expected loss ratio based on historical losses adjusted as appropriate for qualitative factors. Qualitative loss factors are based on management's judgment of company, market, industry or business ~~these~~specific data, changes in underlying loan composition of specific portfolios, trends ~~will likely normalize~~relating to credit quality, delinquency, non-performing and adversely rated loans and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions.

Collateral Dependent Loans – Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. For collateral dependent loans where Bancorp has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and Bancorp expects repayment of the financial asset to be provided substantially through the operation of the business or sale of the collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost basis of the asset as of the measurement date. When repayment is expected to be from the operation of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the financial asset exceeds the NPV of expected cash flows from the operation of the collateral. When repayment is expected to be from the sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized costs basis of the financial asset exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated cost to sell. The ACL may be zero if the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date exceeds the amortized cost basis of loan. Bancorp’s estimate of the ACL reflects losses expected over the ~~long term. Additional information~~remaining contractual life of the loan and the contractual term does not consider extensions, renewals or modifications.

Table of Contents

A loan that has been modified or renewed is considered a TDR when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made for the borrower's benefit that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or transaction with similar credit risk characteristics. TDRs are evaluated individually to determine the required ACL. TDRs performing in accordance with their modified contractual terms for a reasonable period may be included in Bancorp’s existing pools based on the underlying risk characteristics of the loan to measure the ACL.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures – Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to originate loans and commercial letters of credit issued to meet customer-financing needs. Bancorp’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for off-balance sheet loan commitments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

Bancorp records an ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures, unless the commitments to extend credit are unconditionally cancelable, through a charge to credit loss expense for off-balance sheet credit exposures included in other non-interest expense in Bancorp’s consolidated statements of income. The ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures is estimated by loan portfolio segment at each balance sheet date under the current CECL model using the same methodologies as portfolio loans, taking into consideration the likelihood that funding will occur and is included in other liabilities on Bancorp’s consolidated balance sheets.

Table of Contents

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards –Bancorp adopted ASC 326,“Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,” on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective approach. Results for the periods subsequent to January 1, 2020 are presented under ASC 326, while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. Bancorp recorded a net reduction of retained earnings of $8.8 million upon adoption. The transition adjustment included an increase in the ACL on loans of $8.2 million and an increase in the ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures of $3.5 million, net of the total corresponding DTA increase of $2.9 million.

Bancorp adopted ASC 326 using the prospective transition approach for loans purchased with PCD that were previously classified as PCI and accounted for under ASC 310-30. In accordance with the standard, management did not reassess whether PCI loans met the criteria of PCD loans as of the adoption date. On January 1, 2020, non-accretable yield marks of $1.6 million related to formerly classified PCI loans were reclassified between the amortized cost basis of loans and corresponding ACL.

The following table summarizes the impact of the adoption of ASC 326:

January 1, 2020

(in thousands)

As reported under
ASC 326

Pre-ASC 326
Adoption

Impact of Adoption
(1)

Allowance for credit losses on loans:

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 8,333 $ 5,235 $ 3,098
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
6,219 3,327 2,892
Total commercial real estate
14,552 8,562 5,990

Commercial and industrial - term
7,147 6,782 365
Commercial and industrial - line of credit
4,129 5,657 (1,528 )
Total commercial and industrial
11,276 12,439 (1,163 )

Residential real estate - owner occupied
2,713 1,527 1,186
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
1,376 947 429
Total residential real estate
4,089 2,474 1,615

Construction and land development
5,161 2,105 3,056
Home equity lines of credit
842 728 114
Consumer
398 100 298
Leases
233 237 (4 )
Credit cards - commercial
96 146 (50 )
Total allowance for credit losses on loans
$ 36,647 $ 26,791 $ 9,856

Total allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet exposures
$ 3,850 $ 350 $ 3,500
(1)
– The impact of the ASC 326 adoption on the ACL on loans reflects $8.2 million related to the transition from the incurred loss ACL model to the CECL ACL model and $1.6 million related to the transition from PCI to PCD methodology as defined in the standard.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No.2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): “Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” The amendments in this update modify the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying, or adding certain disclosures. The update is effective for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for the removed disclosures and delayed adoption until the fiscal year 2020 permitted for the new disclosures. The removed and modified disclosures will be adopted on a retrospective basis, and the new disclosures will be adopted on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material effect on Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” This ASU simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in the previous two-step impairment test. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the prior requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2, which requires an entity to calculate any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. ASU 2017-04 was effective for Bancorp on January 1, 2020 and it did not have a material impact on Bancorp’s financial statements.
17
Table of Contents
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) - Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by these amendments. ASU 2018-15 was effective for Bancorp on January 1, 2020 and did not have a material impact on Bancorp’s financial statements.
In March 2020, interagency guidance was issued regarding loan modifications and reporting for financial institutions working with customers affected by COVID-19. The interagency statement was effective immediately and affected accounting for loan modifications. Under ASC 310-40, “Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors,” a restructuring of debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The agencies confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to such relief, are not to be considered TDRs. This includes short-term (e.g., six months) modifications such as full payment and principal only deferrals. Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program was implemented. This interagency guidance in addition to deferral guidance included in the CARES Act could have a material impact on Bancorp’s ~~methodology~~financial statements; however, this impact cannot be quantified at this time.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No.2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The amendments in this update provide optional guidance for a limited period to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. It provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Bancorp is currently evaluating the ~~adequacy~~impact of ~~the allowance can be read in~~this ASU on Bancorp’s ~~Annual Report on Form~~ 10~~-K.~~consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Updates ~~(“ASUs”)~~
~~The following ASU was issued prior to~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and is considered relevant to Bancorp’s financial statements.~~ – Generally, if an ~~issued-but-~~issued but not~~-yet-effective~~ yet effective ASU with an expected immaterial impact to Bancorp has been disclosed in prior SEC filings, it will not be re-disclosed.
In April 2019, ~~June 2016,~~ the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)~~FASB issued ASU No.~~2016~~2019-04, “Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments -~~13,~~~~Measurement of~~ Credit Losses on(ASC 326), Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815), and Financial Instruments (ASC 825)~~, (“CECL”)~~. ~~This~~” The amendments in the ASU ~~significantly changes~~improve the ~~way entities recognize impairment of many financial assets~~Codification by ~~requiring immediate recognition of estimated~~eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications. The amended guidance in this ASU related to the credit losses ~~expected to occur over their remaining life. The guidance is~~will be effective for ~~annual~~Bancorp’s for fiscal years and interim ~~reporting~~ periods beginning after December 15, ~~2019.~~2022. ~~Bancorp expects to recognize a~~ ~~one~~~~-time cumulative-effect adjustment to the allowance on~~ ~~January 1, 2020.~~ ~~Interagency guidance issued in~~ ~~December 2018~~ ~~allows for a~~ ~~three~~ ~~year phase-in of the cumulative-effect adjustment for regulatory capital reporting.~~
As a result of this ASU, Bancorp could experience an increase in its allowance. Bancorp has formed a committee to oversee its transition to the CECL methodology. Bancorp has devoted internal resources and purchased a ~~third~~ party software solution to analyze, compute and report upon the CECL disclosure requirements. In addition, Bancorp has analyzed loan-level data and is determining its CECL loan segmentation and initial segment calculation methodologies.  Bancorp is currently ~~exploring regression techniques and has begun to run forecasting scenarios.~~
~~Recently~~ A~~dopted~~ A~~ccounting~~ S~~tandards~~
~~Bancorp adopted~~evaluating the impact of the ASU~~2016~~-~~02,~~~~Leases~~ ~~and related amendments using an alternative transition method, effective~~ ~~January 1, 2019~~ ~~and upon adoption recorded~~ ~~$17~~ ~~million of right-of-use lease assets and~~ ~~$18~~ ~~million of operating lease liabilities on its balance sheet as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019.~~ ~~Prior periods have~~ ~~not~~ ~~been restated. The right-of-use lease asset and operating lease liability are recorded in premises and equipment and other liabilities, respectively,~~ on the Company’s consolidated ~~balance sheet. Bancorp elected all applicable practical expedients, including the option to expense short-term leases, which are defined as leases with a term of~~ ~~one~~ ~~year or less. Bancorp also elected~~ ~~not~~ ~~to separate lease components from non-lease components.~~
~~The adoption of this ASU did~~ ~~not~~ ~~have a meaningful impact on Bancorp's performance metrics, including regulatory capital ratios and return on average assets.  Additionally, Bancorp does~~ ~~not~~ ~~believe that the adoption of this ASU by its clients will have a significant impact on Bancorp's ability to underwrite credit when client~~ financial ~~statements are presented inclusive of the requirements of this ASU. See the note titled “Leases” for additional information on lease activities.~~statements.

12
18

Table of Contents

(2)
Acquisition ~~of King Bancorp, Inc.~~

On May 1, 2019, Bancorp completed its acquisition of ~~King Bancorp, Inc, and its wholly-owned subsidiary King Southern Bank (“King”),~~KSB, for $28 million in cash. The acquisition ~~expands the Company’s~~expanded Bancorp’s market area into nearby Nelson County, Kentucky, while growing its customer base in Louisville, Kentucky.

~~The following table provides a summary of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Bancorp as of the acquisition date. As provided for under GAAP,~~ Effective March 31, 2020, management ~~has up to~~ 12 ~~months following the date of acquisition to finalize~~finalized the fair values of the acquired assets and assumed ~~liabilities.~~ liabilities in advance of 12 months post acquisition date, as allowed by GAAP.
The following table provides a summary of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as recorded by the acquiree, the previously reported preliminary fair value adjustments necessary to adjust those acquired assets and ~~the~~assumed liabilities to fair value, final recast adjustments to those previously reported preliminary fair values, ~~shown in~~and the ~~following table continue to be evaluated~~final fair values of those assets and liabilities as recorded by ~~management and~~ ~~may~~ ~~be subject to further adjustment.~~Bancorp.

May 1, 2019

As Recorded

Fair Value

Recast

As Recorded

(in thousands)

by KSB

Adjustments (1)

Adjustments

by Bancorp

Assets acquired:

Cash and due from banks
$ 3,316 $ — $ — $ 3,316
Interest bearing due from banks
1,761 — — 1,761
Available for sale debt securities
12,404 23
a
— 12,427
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
1,517 — — 1,517
Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost
490 — — 490
Loans
165,744 (1,597 )
b
(118 )
b
164,029
Allowance for credit losses
(1,812 ) 1,812
b
— —
Net loans
163,932 215 (118 ) 164,029
Premises and equipment, net
4,358 (1,328 )
c
431
c
3,461
Bank owned life insurance
3,431 — — 3,431
Core deposit intangible
— 1,519
d
— 1,519
Other real estate owned
325 (325 )
e
— —
Other assets and accrued interest receivable
867 (36 )
f
— 831
Total assets acquired
$ 192,401 $ 68 $ 313 $ 192,782

Liabilities assumed:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing
$ 24,939 $ — $ — $ 24,939
Interest bearing
100,839 (252 )
g
— 100,587
Total deposits
125,778 (252 ) — 125,526

Federal funds purchased
1,566 — — 1,566
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
43,718 (419 )
h
— 43,299
Subordinated note
3,609 — — 3,609
Holding Company line of credit
2,300 — — 2,300
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
313 — — 313

Total liabilities assumed
177,284 (671 ) — 176,613

Net assets acquired
$ 15,117 $ 739 $ 313 $ 16,169

Cash consideration paid
(28,000 )

Goodwill
$ 11,831

~~Acquisition of King Bancorp, Inc.~~
~~Summary of Assets Aquired and Liabilities Assumed~~

May 1, 2019

As Recorded

Fair Value

As Recorded

(In thousands)

by King

Adjustments (1)

by Bancorp

Assets aquired:

Cash and due from banks
$ 3,316 $ — $ 3,316
Interest bearing due from banks
1,761 — 1,761
Available for sale securities
12,404 23
a
12,427
Loans
165,744 (1,597 )
b
164,147
Allowance for loan and lease losses
(1,812 ) 1,812
b
-
Loans, net
163,932 215 164,147
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
1,517 — 1,517
Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost
490 — 490
Premises and equipment, net
4,358 (1,328 )
c
3,030
Core deposit intangible
— 1,519
d
1,519
Bank owned life insurance
3,431 — 3,431
Other real estate owned
325 (325 )
e
—
Other assets and accrued interest receivable
867 (36 )
f
831

Total assets acquired
$ 192,401 $ 68 $ 192,469

Liabilities assumed:

Deposits

Non-interest bearing
$ 24,939 $ — $ 24,939
Interest bearing
100,839 (252 )
g
100,587
Total deposits
125,778 (252 ) 125,526

Federal funds purchased
1,566 — 1,566
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
43,718 (419 )
h
43,299
Subordinated Note
3,609 — 3,609
Holding Company line of credit
2,300 — 2,300
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
313 — 313

Total liabilities assumed
177,284 (671 ) 176,613

Net assets acquired
$ 15,117 $ 739 $ 15,856

Cash consideration paid
(28,000 )

Goodwill
$ 12,144
(1) –
~~Bancorp’s acquisition~~See the following page for explanations of ~~King closed on~~ ~~May 1, 2019.~~ ~~Accordingly, the~~individual fair value ~~adjustments shown are preliminary estimates of the purchase accounting~~ adjustments. ~~Management is continuing to evaluate each of these fair value adjustments and~~ ~~may~~ ~~revise~~ ~~one~~ or more of such fair value adjustments in future periods based on this continuing evaluation. To the extent that any of these preliminary fair value adjustments are revised in future periods, the resultant fair values and the amount of goodwill recorded by the Company will change.

13
19
Table of Contents

Explanation of the above pre-ASC 326fair value adjustments:

a.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on Bancorp’s evaluation of the acquired investment portfolio.

b.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on Bancorp’s evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio and to eliminate ~~King’s~~the acquiree’s recorded ~~allowance.~~ ACL.

c.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on Bancorp’s evaluation of the premises and equipment acquired.

d.
Reflects the fair value adjustment for the ~~core deposit intangible~~CDI asset recorded as a result of the acquisition.

e.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based upon Bancorp’s evaluation of the foreclosed real estate acquired.

f.
Reflects the write-off of a miscellaneous other asset.

g.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on ~~the Company’s~~Bancorp’s evaluation of the assumed time deposits.

h.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based upon Bancorp’s evaluation of the assumed FHLB advances.
Goodwill of approximately $12 million, which is the excess of the acquisition consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired, is expected to be recorded in the King acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is all attributable to the Company’s Commercial Banking segment and is ~~not~~ expected to be deductible for tax purposes. To the extent that management revises any of the above fair value adjustments as a result of its continuing evaluation, the amount of goodwill recorded in the King acquisition will change. As a result of the King transaction, and based upon the proximity to existing branch locations, Bancorp expects to sell ~~three~~ ~~acquired branch buildings in the~~ ~~third~~ ~~quarter of~~ ~~2019,~~ ~~while retaining the associated customer relationships. These branches are considered held available for sale as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019.~~ ~~If consummated, goodwill will be adjusted in that period.~~
~~Revenue attributed to King totaled $1.6 million for the~~ ~~three~~ ~~and~~ ~~six~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2019.~~ ~~Prior year pro-forma financial statements were~~ ~~not~~ ~~presented due to the immateriality of the transaction.~~

Goodwill of approximately $12 million, which is the excess of the acquisition consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill was entirely attributable to Bancorp’s Commercial Banking segment and deductible for tax purposes.
Based upon the proximity to existing branch locations, Bancorp closed and ultimately sold three acquired full service branch locations in 2019, while retaining the associated customer relationships. Goodwill was recast in 2019 based on these sales.
Pro forma financial information as of the acquisition was not considered material.
14
20

Table of Contents

(3)
Available for Sale Debt Securities

All of Bancorp’s debt securities are classified as ~~available for sale.~~AFS. Amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities follow:

(In thousands)

Amortized

Unrealized

June 30, 2019
cost
Gains

Losses
Fair value

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ 266,579 $ 1,755 $ (319 ) $ 268,015
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
131,447 938 (787 ) 131,598
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
23,854 118 (6 ) 23,966

Total securities available for sale
$ 421,880 $ 2,811 $ (1,112 ) $ 423,579

December 31, 2018

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
264,234 156 (3,351 ) 261,039
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
149,748 282 (3,753 ) 146,277
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
29,760 107 (188 ) 29,679

Total securities available for sale
$ 443,742 $ 545 $ (7,292 ) $ 436,995
(in thousands)

Unrealized

Allowance

June 30, 2020

Amortized
cost

Gains

Losses

for Credit
Losses
Fair value

Obligations of states and political subdivisions
$ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Government sponsored enterprise obligations
199,838 4,788 (215 ) — 204,411
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
262,565 7,702 (13 ) — 270,254
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
10,394 190 — — 10,584

Total available for sale debt securities
$ 472,797 $ 12,680 $ (228 ) $ — $ 485,249

December 31, 2019

Obligations of states and political subdivisions
$ 49,887 $ 10 $ — $ — $ 49,897
Government sponsored enterprise obligations
208,933 1,189 (178 ) — 209,944
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
193,574 1,243 (956 ) — 193,861
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
16,919 117 — — 17,036

Total available for sale debt securities
$ 469,313 $ 2,559 $ (1,134 ) $ — $ 470,738

At June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no holdings of debt securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

There were no0 gains or losses on sales or calls of securities for the three-month and six ~~month~~-month periods ending June 30, ~~2019~~2020 orand ~~2018.~~2019. Securities ~~owned by King,~~acquired in the May 1, 2019 acquisition totaling ~~$12.4~~$12 million, were sold immediately following the acquisition with no0 gain or loss realized in the income statement.

Accrued interest on AFS debt securities totaled $1.5 million and $1.6 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, and was included in the consolidated balance sheets.
A summary of AFS debt securities ~~available for sale~~ by contractual maturity as of June 30, 2020 follows:

(In thousands)

Amortized cost

Fair value

(in thousands)

Amortized cost

Fair value

Due within 1 year
$ 132,158 $ 132,133 $ 75,092 $ 75,164
Due after 1 year but within 5 years
56,040 56,033 31,457 32,114
Due after 5 years but within 10 years
7,157 7,232 3,972 4,145
Due after 10 years
95,078 96,583 99,711 103,572
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
131,447 131,598 262,565 270,254
Total securities available for sale
$ 421,880 $ 423,579 $ 472,797 $ 485,249

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties. The investment portfolio includes ~~agency mortgage backed securities,~~MBS’s, which are guaranteed by agencies such as ~~Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”),~~FHLMC, FNMA and ~~Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”).~~GNMA. These securities differ from traditional debt securities primarily in that they may have uncertain principal payment dates and are priced based on estimated prepayment rates on the underlying collateral.

Securities with a carrying value of ~~$336.5~~$395 million and ~~$355.1~~$403 million were pledged at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, to secure accounts of commercial depositors in cash management accounts, public ~~deposits,~~funds and uninsured cash balances for WM&T accounts.

15
21
Table of Contents

~~Securities~~AFS debt securities with unrealized ~~losses at~~loss position for which an ACL has ~~June 30, 2019~~ not~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018,~~ been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous ~~unrealized~~ loss position ~~follows:~~follow:

(In thousands)

Less than 12 months

12 months or more

Total

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

June 30, 2019

value

losses

value

losses

value

losses

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ — $ — $ 57,505 $ (319 ) $ 57,505 $ (319 )
Mortgage-backed securities - government agencies
— — 82,088 (787 ) 82,088 (787 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
— — 6,485 (6 ) 6,485 (6 )

Total temporarily impaired securities
$ — $ — $ 146,078 $ (1,112 ) $ 146,078 $ (1,112 )

December 31, 2018

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
96,740 (38 ) 149,320 (3,313 ) 246,060 (3,351 )
Mortgage-backed securities - government agencies
3,108 (5 ) 120,848 (3,748 ) 123,956 (3,753 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
814 (1 ) 17,639 (187 ) 18,453 (188 )

Total temporarily impaired securities
$ 100,662 $ (44 ) $ 287,807 $ (7,248 ) $ 388,469 $ (7,292 )

Less than 12 months

12 months or more

Total

(in thousands)

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

June 30, 2020

value

losses

value

losses

value

losses

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ 19,614 $ (149 ) $ 5,548 $ (66 ) $ 25,162 $ (215 )
Mortgage-backed securities - government agencies
16,358 (13 ) — — 16,358 (13 )

Total
$ 35,972 $ (162 ) $ 5,548 $ (66 ) $ 41,520 $ (228 )

December 31, 2019

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ 16,503 $ (107 ) $ 11,492 $ (71 ) $ 27,995 $ (178 )
Mortgage-backed securities - government agencies
81,664 (496 ) 32,453 (460 ) 114,117 (956 )

Total
$ 98,167 $ (603 ) $ 43,945 $ (531 ) $ 142,112 $ (1,134 )

Applicable dates for determining when securities are in an unrealized loss position are June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. As such, it is possible that a security had a market value lower than its amortized cost on other days during the past ~~twelve~~12 months, but is not in the “Less than 12 months” category above.

For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, Bancorp evaluates the securities to determine whether the decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis (impairment) is due to credit-related factors or non-credit related factors. Any impairment that is not credit-related is recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Credit-related impairment is recognized as an a ACL on AFS debt securities on the balance sheet, limited to the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. Both the ACL and the adjustment to net income may be reversed if conditions change. However, if Bancorp intends to sell an impaired AFS debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell such a security before recovering its amortized cost basis, the entire impairment amount would be recognized in earnings with a corresponding adjustment to the security’s amortized cost basis. Because the security’s amortized cost basis is adjusted to fair value, there is no ACL in this situation.
In evaluating AFS debt securities in unrealized loss positions for impairment and the criteria regarding its intent or requirement to sell such securities, Bancorp considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuers’ financial condition, among other factors. Unrealized losses on Bancorp’s investment securities portfolio have not been recognized as an expense because the securities are of high credit quality, and the decline in fair values is ~~due~~attributable to changes in the prevailing interest rate environment since the purchase date. Fair value is expected to recover as securities reach maturity and/or the interest rate environment returns to conditions similar to when these securities were purchased. These investments ~~consist~~consisted of 619 and ~~117~~54 separate investment positions as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. ~~Because management does~~There were ~~not~~no ~~intend to sell the~~credit related factors underlying unrealized losses on AFS debt securities ~~and it is~~ ~~not~~ ~~likely that Bancorp will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which~~ ~~may~~ ~~be maturity, Bancorp does~~ ~~not~~ ~~consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired~~ at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

~~The term “other-than-temporary” is~~ ~~not~~ ~~intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are~~ ~~not~~ necessarily favorable, or that there is a general lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for the anticipated credit losses.
~~Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (“FHLB”)~~FHLB stock isrepresents an investment held by Bancorp ~~which~~that is not readily marketable and is carried at cost adjusted for identified ~~impairment.~~impairment, if any. Impairment is evaluated on an annual basis in the fourth ~~quarter.~~quarter and more often if market conditions warrant. Bancorp has never recorded FHLB stock impairment. Holdings of FHLB stock are required for access to FHLB advances.

16
22

Table of Contents

(4)
Loans and ~~leases~~Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans

Composition of loans by class as reported under ASC 326 follows:
(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 815,464 $ 746,283
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
472,457 474,329
Total commercial real estate
1,287,921 1,220,612

Commercial and industrial - term
510,384 457,298
Commercial and industrial - term - PPP
630,082 —
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
254,096 381,502
Total commercial and industrial
1,394,562 838,800

Residential real estate - owner occupied
215,891 217,606
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
139,121 134,995
Total residential real estate
355,012 352,601

Construction and land development
255,447 255,816
Home equity lines of credit
103,672 103,854
Consumer
43,758 47,467
Leases
14,843 16,003
Credits cards - commercial
8,862 9,863
Total loans (1)
$ 3,464,077 $ 2,845,016
(1) Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts, and net of ~~deferred~~loan origination fees and ~~costs,~~costs.
For historical comparative purposes, the composition of loans by ~~loan portfolio~~ class pre-ASC 326 adoption follows:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

December 31, 2019

Commercial and industrial
$ 860,085 $ 833,524 $ 870,511
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land~~(1)~~
222,632 225,050 213,822
Undeveloped land
35,169 30,092 46,360

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
696,421 588,610 736,618
Owner occupied commercial
452,719 426,373 473,783
1-4 family residential
338,957 276,017 334,358
Home equity - first lien
46,012 49,500 48,620
Home equity - junior lien
67,948 70,947 73,477
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,602,057 1,411,447 1,666,856

Consumer
43,937 48,058 47,467
Total loans(2)
$ 2,763,880 $ 2,548,171
Total loans (1)
$ 2,845,016

(1~~) Consists of land acquired for development by the borrower, but for which~~ no ~~development has yet taken place~~.
(2) Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts, and net of loan origination fees and costs.

Accrued interest on loans, which is excluded from the amortized cost of loans, totaled $12 million and $7 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31,2019, respectively, and was included in the consolidated balance sheets.
Loans with carrying amounts of $1.9 billion and $1.6 billion at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, were pledged to secure FHLB borrowing capacity.

Loans to directors and their related interests, including loans to companies for which directors are principal owners and executive officers, totaled ~~$53.7~~$46 million and ~~$52.7~~$43 million as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

17
23
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes loans acquired in ~~the King~~ Bancorp’s May 1, 2019 acquisition, ~~based upon valuation method:~~as recasted:

May 1, 2019

Contractual

Non-accretable

Accretable

Acquisition-day

(In thousands)

receivable

amount

amount

fair value

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,249 $ — $ (23 ) $ 8,226
Construction and development
10,764 — 43 10,807
Raw Land
7,974 — 43 8,017
Real estate mortgage:

Commercial real estate
84,219 — (408 ) 83,811
1-4 family residential
50,556 — 322 50,878
Home equity - first lien
196 — 3 199
Home equity - junior lien
679 — 5 684
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
135,650 — (78 ) 135,572

Consumer
1,528 — (3 ) 1,525

Total loans ASC 310-20
164,165 — (18 ) 164,147

Commercial and industrial

Construction and development
— — — —
Raw Land
— — — —
Real estate mortgage:

Commercial real estate
1,351 (1,351 ) — —
1-4 family residential
228 (228 ) — —
Home equity - first lien
— — — —
Home equity - junior lien
— — — —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,579 (1,579 ) — —

Consumer
— — — —

Total loans ASC 310 purchased- credit-impaired loans
1,579 (1,579 ) — —

Total loans
$ 165,744 $ (1,579 ) $ (18 ) $ 164,147

May 1, 2019

Contractual

Non-accretable

Accretable

Acquisition-day

(in thousands)

Receivable

Yield

Yield

Fair Value

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,249 $ — $ (23 ) $ 8,226
Construction and land development
18,738 — 86 18,824
Real estate mortgage:

Commercial real estate
84,219 — (456 ) 83,763
Residential real estate
50,556 — 322 50,878
Home equity lines of credit
875 — 8 883
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
135,650 — (126 ) 135,524

Consumer
1,528 — (73 ) 1,455

Total loans acquired under ASC 310-20
164,165 — (136 ) 164,029

Commercial and industrial
— — — —
Construction and land development
— — — —
Real estate mortgage:

Commercial real estate
1,351 (1,351 ) — —
Residential real estate
228 (228 ) — —
Home equity lines of credit
— — — —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,579 (1,579 ) — —

Consumer
— — — —

Total purchased credit impaired loans acquired under ASC 310-30
1,579 (1,579 ) — —

Total loans
$ 165,744 $ (1,579 ) $ (136 ) $ 164,029

~~Purchased-Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) Loans~~

The Bank acquired PCI loans onrelated to its ~~May 1,~~ 2019~~in its King~~ and 2013 acquisitions. At acquisition ~~and during the year ended~~ ~~December 31, 2012~~ ~~in the TBOC acquisition. PCI~~date, these loans ~~are~~were accounted for under ASC 310-30. On January 1, 2020, Bancorp adopted ASC 326 using the prospective transition approach for loans purchased with credit deterioration that were previously classified as PCI and accounted for under ASC 310-30. In accordance with the standard, management did not reassess whether PCI loans met the criteria of PCD loans as of the adoption date. On January 1, 2020, non-accretable yield marks of $1.6 million related to formerly classified PCI loans were reclassed between the amortized cost basis of loans and corresponding ACL.
24
Table of Contents
Bancorp’s estimate of the ACL on loans reflects losses expected over the remaining contractual life of the assets. The contractual term does not consider extensions, renewals or modifications. The activity in the ACL related to loans follows (2020 is presented in accordance with ASC 326 and 2019 in accordance with ASC 310):
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020

Beginning
Balance

Impact of
Adopting
ASC 326

Initial ACL on
Loans Purchased
with Credit
Deterioration

Provision for
Credit Losses

Charge-offs

Recoveries

Ending
Balance

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 13,435 $ - $ - $ 5,403 $ - $ 1 $ 18,839
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
6,509 - - 197 - - 6,706
Total commercial real estate
19,944 - - 5,600 - 1 25,545

Commercial and industrial - term
7,990 - - (651 ) - - 7,339
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
3,866 - - (624 ) - - 3,242
Total commercial and industrial
11,856 - - (1,275 ) - - 10,581

Residential real estate - owner occupied
2,702 - - 162 (18 ) 2 2,848
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
1,419 - - 175 - - 1,594
Total residential real estate
4,121 - - 337 (18 ) 2 4,442

Construction and land development
5,185 - - 423 - - 5,608
Home equity lines of credit
623 - - 209 - - 832
Consumer
198 - - 134 (80 ) 110 362
Leases
159 - - 64 - - 223
Credit cards - commercial
57 - - 58 - - 115
Total net loan (charge-offs) recoveries
$ 42,143 $ - $ - $ 5,550 $ (98 ) $ 113 $ 47,708
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

Beginning
Balance

Impact of
Adopting
ASC 326

Initial ACL on
Loans Purchased
with Credit
Deterioration

Provision for
Credit Losses

Charge-offs

Recoveries

Ending
Balance

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 5,235 $ 2,946 $ 152 $ 10,503 $ - $ 3 $ 18,839
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
3,327 1,542 1,350 487 - - 6,706
Total commercial real estate
8,562 4,488 1,502 10,990 - 3 25,545

Commercial and industrial - term
6,782 365 - 185 - 7 7,339
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
5,657 (1,528 ) - (887 ) - - 3,242
Total commercial and industrial
12,439 (1,163 ) - (702 ) - 7 10,581

Residential real estate - owner occupied
1,527 1,087 99 151 (18 ) 2 2,848
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
947 429 - 218 - - 1,594
Total residential real estate
2,474 1,516 99 369 (18 ) 2 4,442

Construction and land development
2,105 3,056 - 447 - - 5,608
Home equity lines of credit
728 114 - (10 ) - - 832
Consumer
100 264 34 (3 ) (254 ) 221 362
Leases
237 (4 ) - (10 ) - - 223
Credit cards - commercial
146 (50 ) - 19 - - 115
Total net loan (charge-offs) recoveries
$ 26,791 $ 8,221 $ 1,635 $ 11,100 $ (272 ) $ 233 $ 47,708
25
Table of Contents
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019

Beginning
Balance

Provision for
Credit Losses

Charge-offs

Recoveries

Ending
Balance

Real estate mortgage
$ 12,001 $ 10 $ (13 ) $ 32 $ 12,030
Commercial and industrial
11,762 92 - 4 11,858
Construction and development
1,884 (74 ) - - 1,810
Undeveloped land
662 (61 ) - - 601
Consumer
155 33 (148 ) 77 117
$ 26,464 $ - $ (161 ) $ 113 $ 26,416
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended Six June 30, 2019

Beginning
Balance

Provision for
Credit Losses

Charge-offs

Recoveries

Ending
Balance

Real estate mortgage
$ 10,681 $ 1,310 $ (13 ) $ 52 $ 12,030
Commercial and industrial
11,965 (210 ) (3 ) 106 11,858
Construction and development
1,760 (153 ) - 203 1,810
Undeveloped land
752 (151 ) - - 601
Consumer
376 (196 ) (244 ) 181 117
$ 25,534 $ 600 $ (260 ) $ 542 $ 26,416
Upon adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, Bancorp recorded an increase of $8.2 million to the ACL on loans and a corresponding decrease to retained earnings, net of the DTA impact. In addition, non-accretable yield marks of $1.6 million related to formerly classified PCI loans were re-classed between the amortized cost basis of loans and corresponding ACL. The adjustment upon adoption of ASC 326 raised the ACL on loans balance to $37 million on January 1, 2020. In addition to CECL adoption, the ACL on the first and second quarters of 2020 was significantly impacted by Bancorp’s national unemployment forecast adjustments within the CECL model, changes in the loan mix and the addition of a large specific reserve during the second quarter of 2020.
Bancorp measures expected credit losses of financial assets on a collective (pool) basis, when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics. Depending on the nature of the pool of financial assets with similar risk characteristics, Bancorp has measured its portfolio classes as follows:
Loan Portfolio Segment
ACL Methodology
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Commercial and industrial - term
Static pool
Commercial and industrial - line of credit
Static pool
Residential real estate - owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Construction and land development
Static pool
Home equity lines of credit
Static pool
Consumer
Static pool
Leases
Static pool
Credit cards - commercial
Static pool
The static pool methodology is utilized for the loan portfolio segments that typically have shorter durations. For each of these loan segments, Bancorp applies an expected loss ratio based on historical losses adjusted as appropriate for qualitative factors. Qualitative loss factors are based on management's judgment of company, market, industry or business specific data, changes in underlying loan composition of specific portfolios, trends relating to credit quality, delinquency, non-performing and adversely rated loans, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions.
When developing the ACL CECL model for loan pools utilizing the DCF method, Bancorp utilized regression analysis of historical internal and peer data to identify a suitable loss driver to utilize when modeling lifetime probability of default and loss given default. Such regression analysis was used to measure how the expected probability of default and loss given default would react to changes in forecasted levels of the loss driver. Based on this regression analysis, management determined that the forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate best correlated to Bancorp’s historical losses and elected to use this rate as the primary loss driver to be consistently applied across all applicable loan segments over a reasonable and supportable forecast period.
26
Table of Contents
Upon adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, management determined that four quarters represented a reasonable and supportable national unemployment forecast period with reversion back to Bancorp’s historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. This resulted in an $8.2 million initial increase in the ACL on loans with the offset to retained earnings.
Subsequent to January 1, 2020, based on the economic crisis caused by COVID-19 and measures taken to protect public health such as stay-at-home orders and mandatory closures of businesses, economic activity halted significantly and job losses surged. As such, national unemployment has fluctuated widely over the last several months as follows:
Jun 20
May 20
Apr 20
Mar 20
Feb 20
Jan 20
Dec 19
National Unemployment Rate
11.10 % 13.30 % 14.70 % 4.40 % 3.50 % 3.60 % 3.50 %
As of March 31, 2020, based on the evolving pandemic, Bancorp elected to forecast for only one quarter of national unemployment (versus the four quarters used as of January 1, 2020) and modified its forecast to reflect a significant increase in unemployment (utilizing the highest unemployment rate in Bancorp’s observed history) reverting back to the long-term average in the third quarter of 2020, with the loss driver remaining significantly worse compared to recent trends. The impact of the increased national unemployment forecast was muted by an adjustment in qualitative factors attributed to the massive federal stimulus programs enacted at the end of the first quarter in response to the pandemic. The forecasted increase in national unemployment coupled with the qualitative factor adjustments resulted in approximately $4.2 million of the total provision expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
For all loan pools utilizing the DCF method, management utilizes the forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate as its primary loss driver, as this was determined to best correlate to historical losses. During the second quarter, for the first time during 2020, the FRB released a forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate for the 12 months endedDecember 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022 as follows:

2020

2021

2022

Upper end of range
14.0 % 12.0 % 8.0 %
Median
9.3 % 6.5 % 5.5 %
Lower end of range
7.0 % 4.5 % 4.0 %
As of June 30, 2020, based on the above and the continuation of the economic crisis, Bancorp elected to forecast for one quarter of national unemployment utilizing actual unemployment in June then stepping down to a blended rate based on the above FRB median forecast over the next four quarters before reverting back to the long-term average. Similar to the first quarter of 2020, the impact of the increased unemployment forecast was muted by an adjustment in qualitative factors attributed to the massive federal stimulus programs that have been enacted. The forecasted increase in unemployment coupled with the qualitative factor adjustments resulted in approximately $4.6 million of the total provision expense recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and $8.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.
Outstanding loans (excluding PPP loans) increased $92 million during the firstthree months of 2020 and contracted $103 million during the second quarter of 2020, as outstanding C&I lines of credit were reduced by $114 million. The overall net change in the loan mix contributed to $1.3 million of additional provision expense for the three months ended March 31, 2020. During the second quarter of 2020, the loan contraction (mainly C&I lines of credit) led to a $1.0 million reduction in the required ACL on loans.
The pandemic has had a material impact on Bancorp’s ACL on loans calculations for both March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020. While Bancorp has not yet experienced any credit quality issues such as charge-offs related to the pandemic, the ACL calculation for loans and resulting provision were significantly impacted by changes in forecasted economic conditions. Should the forecast for economic conditions worsen, Bancorp could experience further increases in its required ACL and record additional provision expense. While the execution of Bancorp’s payment deferral program has assisted the ratio of past due loans to total loans at March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, it is possible that asset quality could worsen at future measurement periods if the effects of the pandemic are prolonged.
In connection with the adoption of ASC 326, Bancorp analyzed its unused lines of credit and recorded credit loss expense for off-balance sheet exposures (non-interest expense) totaling $375,000 and $1.5 million during the first and second quarters of 2020. The second quarter increase directly correlates to the increased availability due to C&I line of credit pay downs. At June 30, 2020, approximately $6 million was accrued within other liabilities related to off balance sheet exposures.
27
Table of Contents
During the three months ended June 30, 2020, a large CRE relationship was placed on non-accrual status and received a $2 million specific reserve allocation within the ACL on loans. The borrower did not receive PPP funds, the loan was current at the time of non-accrual classification, and no payments related to the loan have been deferred.
The following table presents the amortized cost basis and ACL allocated for collateral dependent loans in accordance with ASC 326, which are individually evaluated to determine expected credit losses:
(in thousands)
June 30, 2020

Real Estate

Accounts
Receivable /
Equipment

Other

Total

ACL
Allocation

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 10,569 $ - $ - $ 10,569 $ 2,255
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
3,014 - - 3,014 1,351
Total commercial real estate
13,583 - - 13,583 3,606

Commercial and industrial - term
- 9 18 27 18
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
- - - - -
Total commercial and industrial
- 9 18 27 18

Residential real estate - owner occupied
445 - - 445 99
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
225 - - 225 -
Total residential real estate
670 - - 670 99

Construction and land development
- - - - -
Home equity lines of credit
- - - - -
Consumer
- - 26 26 26
Leases
- - - - -
Credit cards - commercial
- - - - -
Total collateral dependent loans
$ 14,253 $ 9 $ 44 $ 14,306 $ 3,749
There have been no significant changes to the types of collateral securing Bancorp’s collateral dependent loans.
The following table presents loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment and the respective ACL allocation as of December 31, 2019, as determined in accordance with ASC 310 prior to the adoption of ASC 326:

Loans

ACL

(in thousands)
December 31, 2019

Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment

Loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment

Loans acquired
with deteriorated
credit quality

Total loans

Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment

Loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment

Loans acquired
with deteriorated
credit quality

Total ACL

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,223 $ 862,288 $ — $ 870,511 $ 1,150 $ 11,672 $ — $ 12,822
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— 213,822 — 213,822 — 1,319 — 1,319
Undeveloped land
— 46,360 — 46,360 — 786 — 786
Real estate mortgage
3,307 1,663,549 — 1,666,856 13 11,751 — 11,764
Consumer
— 47,467 — 47,467 — 100 — 100

Total
$ 11,530 $ 2,833,486 $ — $ 2,845,016 $ 1,163 $ 25,628 $ — $ 26,791
28
Table of Contents
The following table presents information pertaining to impaired loans as of December 31, 2019 and the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2019, as determined in accordance with ASC 310:

As of

Three months ended

Six months ended

December 31, 2019

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

Unpaid

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

Recorded

principal

Related

recorded

income

recorded

income

(in thousands)

investment

balance

ACL

investment

recognized

investment

recognized

Impaired loans with no related ACL

Commercial and industrial
$ 174 $ 174 $ — $ 144 $ — $ 160 $ —
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — — — — 106 —
Undeveloped land
— — — — — 158 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
741 741 — 311 — 254 —
Owner occupied commercial
2,278 2,736 — 1,455 — 1,165 —
1-4 family residential
124 124 — 779 — 773 —
Home equity - junior lien
151 151 — 462 — 356 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
3,294 3,752 — 3,007 — 2,548 —

Subtotal
$ 3,468 $ 3,926 $ — $ 3,151 $ — $ 2,972 $ —

Impaired loans with an ACL

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,049 $ 8,049 $ 1,150 $ 24 $ — $ 26 $ 1
Real estate mortgage 1-4 family residential
13 13 13 14 — 14 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
13 13 13 14 — 14 —

Subtotal
$ 8,062 $ 8,062 $ 1,163 $ 38 $ — $ 40 $ 1

Total impaired loans:

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,223 $ 8,223 $ 1,150 $ 168 $ — $ 186 $ 1
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — — — — 106 —
Undeveloped land
— — — — — 158 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
741 741 — 311 — 254 —
Owner occupied commercial
2,278 2,736 — 1,455 — 1,165 —
1-4 family residential
137 137 13 793 — 787 —
Home equity - junior lien
151 151 — 462 — 356 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
3,307 3,765 13 3,021 — 2,562 —

Total
$ 11,530 $ 11,988 $ 1,163 $ 3,189 $ — $ 3,012 $ 1
Differences between recorded investment amounts and unpaid principal balance amounts less related ACL are due to partial charge-offs which have occurred over the lives of certain loans.
29
Table of Contents
The following tables present the aging of contractually past due loans by portfolio class (2020 is presented in accordance with ASC 326 and 2019 in accordance with ASC 310):
(in thousands)

30-59 days

60-89 days

90 or more

Total

Total

June 30, 2020

Current

Past Due

Past Due

Days Past Due

Past Due

Loans

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 814,610 $ 121 $ 35 $ 698 $ 854 $ 815,464
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
469,529 256 — 2,672 2,928 472,457
Total commercial real estate
1,284,139 377 35 3,370 3,782 1,287,921

Commercial and industrial - term
1,140,384 59 14 9 82 1,140,466
Commercial and industrial - line of credit
253,645 41 310 100 451 254,096
Total commercial and industrial
1,394,029 100 324 109 533 1,394,562

Residential real estate - owner occupied
214,681 603 290 317 1,210 215,891
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
138,823 — 24 274 298 139,121
Total residential real estate
353,504 603 314 591 1,508 355,012

Construction and land development
255,399 — — 48 48 255,447
Home equity lines of credit
103,672 — — — — 103,672
Consumer
43,727 30 1 — 31 43,758
Leases
14,843 — — — — 14,843
Credit cards - commercial
8,862 — — — — 8,862
Total
$ 3,458,175 $ 1,110 $ 674 $ 4,118 $ 5,902 $ 3,464,077

90 or more

Days Past Due

(in thousands)

30-59 days

60-89 days

(includes all

Total

Total

December 31, 2019

Current

Past Due

Past Due

non-accrual)

Past Due

Loans

Commercial and industrial
$ 861,860 $ 253 $ 194 $ 8,204 $ 8,651 $ 870,511
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
213,766 6 50 — 56 213,822
Undeveloped land
46,360 — — — — 46,360

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
735,387 94 — 1,137 1,231 736,618
Owner occupied commercial
470,951 467 86 2,279 2,832 473,783
1-4 family residential
332,718 1,368 33 239 1,640 334,358
Home equity - first lien
48,441 179 — — 179 48,620
Home equity - junior lien
72,995 196 100 186 482 73,477
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,660,492 2,304 219 3,841 6,364 1,666,856

Consumer
47,379 84 4 — 88 47,467

Total
$ 2,829,857 $ 2,647 $ 467 $ 12,045 $ 15,159 $ 2,845,016
30
Table of Contents
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of non-performing loans and the amortized cost basis of loans on non-accrual status for which there was no related ACL losses of June 30, 2020:

Past Due 90-Days-

(In thousands)

Non-accrual

Total

or-More and Still

June 30, 2020

with no ACL

Non-accrual

Accruing Interest

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 213 $ 10,569 $ -
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
1,663 3,014 -
Total commercial real estate
1,876 13,583 -

Commercial and industrial - term
9 9 -
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
- - -
Total commercial and industrial
9 9 -

Residential real estate - owner occupied
306 445 -
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
225 225 -
Total residential real estate
531 670 -

Construction and land development
- - 48
Home equity lines of credit
- - -
Consumer
- - -
Leases
- - -
Credit cards - commercial
- - -
Total
$ 2,416 $ 14,262 $ 48
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the amount of accrued interest income previously recorded as revenue and subsequently reversed due to the change in accrual status was immaterial.
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019,no interest income was recognized on loans on non-accrual status.
The following table presents the recorded investment in non-performing loans by portfolio class as of December 31, 2019:
December 31, 2019 (in thousands)

Non-accrual

Past Due 90-Days-or-
More and Still
Accruing Interest

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,202 $ —
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— —
Undeveloped land
— —

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
740 396
Owner occupied commercial
2,278 —
1-4 family residential
123 104
Home equity - first lien
— —
Home equity - junior lien
151 35
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
3,292 535
Consumer
— —

Total
$ 11,494 $ 535
31
Table of Contents
Loan Risk Ratings
Consistent with regulatory guidance, Bancorp categorizes loans into credit risk rating categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends. Pass-rated loans include all risk-rated loans other than those classified as OAEM, substandard, and doubtful, which are defined below:
OAEM – Loans classified as OAEM have potential weaknesses requiring management's heightened attention. These potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects for the loan or of Bancorp's credit position at some future date.
Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the paying capacity of the obligor or of collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize ultimate repayment of the debt. Default is a distinct possibility if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Substandard non-performing – Loans classified as substandard non-performing have all the characteristics of substandard loans and have been placed on non-accrual status or have been accounted for as TDRs. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when prospects for recovering both principal and accrued interest are considered doubtful or when a default of principal or interest has existed for 90 days or more.
Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or repayment in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.
32
Table of Contents
Management considers the guidance in ASC 310-20 when determining whether a modification, extension, or renewal of loan constitutes a current period origination. Current period renewals of credit are re-underwritten at the point of renewal and considered current period originations for purposes of the table below. As of June 30, 2020, the risk rating of loans based on year of origination is as follows:

Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year

Revolving

Revolving

loans

loans

(in thousands)

amortized

converted

June 30, 2020

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

cost basis

to term

Total

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied:

Risk rating

Pass
$ 174,017 $ 171,037 $ 106,905 $ 126,594 $ 95,310 $ 96,646 $ 13,982 $ 11,989 $ 796,480
OAEM
61 - - - 1,578 52 472 - 2,163
Substandard
4,200 2,051 - - - 1 - - 6,252
Substandard non-performing
9,727 - - 614 - 228 - - 10,569
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Commercial real estate non-owner occupied
$ 188,005 $ 173,088 $ 106,905 $ 127,208 $ 96,888 $ 96,927 $ 14,454 $ 11,989 $ 815,464

Commercial real estate - owner occupied:

Risk rating

Pass
$ 102,192 $ 109,160 $ 91,659 $ 53,309 $ 44,522 $ 49,472 $ 7,144 $ 851 $ 458,309
OAEM
- 62 967 825 252 76 - - 2,182
Substandard
- 6,997 1,363 105 127 360 - - 8,952
Substandard non-performing
- - 20 500 - 2,151 - 343 3,014
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Commercial real estate owner occupied
$ 102,192 $ 116,219 $ 94,009 $ 54,739 $ 44,901 $ 52,059 $ 7,144 $ 1,194 $ 472,457

Commercial and industrial - term:

Risk rating

Pass
$ 768,510 $ 110,924 $ 111,287 $ 51,862 $ 43,348 $ 26,536 $ - $ 7,755 $ 1,120,222
OAEM
- 928 11,679 160 83 17 - - 12,867
Substandard
5,249 1,853 - - 189 77 - - 7,368
Substandard non-performing
- - - - 9 - - - 9
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Commercial and industrial - term
$ 773,759 $ 113,705 $ 122,966 $ 52,022 $ 43,629 $ 26,630 $ - $ 7,755 $ 1,140,466

Commercial and industrial - lines of credit

Risk rating

Pass
$ 13,460 $ 29,646 $ 4,191 $ 2,956 $ 364 $ - $ 193,105 $ - $ 243,722
OAEM
- - - - - - 783 - 783
Substandard
- - - - - - 9,591 - 9,591
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - - - - -
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
$ 13,460 $ 29,646 $ 4,191 $ 2,956 $ 364 $ - $ 203,479 $ - $ 254,096
(continued)
33
Table of Contents
(continued)

Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year

Revolving

Revolving

loans

loans

(in thousands)

amortized

converted

June 30, 2020

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

cost basis

to term

Total

Residential real estate - owner occupied

Risk rating

Pass
$ 35,591 $ 43,994 $ 29,055 $ 26,881 $ 32,877 $ 46,720 $ - $ 195 $ 215,313
OAEM
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard
16 - - 118 - - - - 134
Substandard non-performing
- - - 101 38 205 - 100 444
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Residential real estate - owner occupied
$ 35,607 $ 43,994 $ 29,055 $ 27,100 $ 32,915 $ 46,925 $ - $ 295 $ 215,891

Residential real estate - non-owner occupied

Risk rating

Pass
$ 43,459 $ 27,037 $ 29,437 $ 12,618 $ 11,728 $ 12,740 $ - $ 158 $ 137,177
OAEM
- 1,600 - - - 88 - - 1,688
Substandard
- - 31 - - - - - 31
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - 225 - - 225
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 43,459 $ 28,637 $ 29,468 $ 12,618 $ 11,728 $ 13,053 $ - $ 158 $ 139,121

Construction and land development

Risk rating

Pass
$ 55,195 $ 97,608 $ 66,746 $ 23,159 $ 1,249 $ 2,764 $ 6,842 $ 1,883 $ 255,446
OAEM
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard
- - - - 1 - - - 1
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - - - - -
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Construction and land development
$ 55,195 $ 97,608 $ 66,746 $ 23,159 $ 1,250 $ 2,764 $ 6,842 $ 1,883 $ 255,447

Home equity lines of credit

Risk rating

Pass
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 103,672 $ - $ 103,672
OAEM
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - - - - -
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Home equity lines of credit
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 103,672 $ - $ 103,672

Consumer

Risk rating

Pass *
$ 3,680 $ 5,697 $ 4,042 $ 498 $ 525 $ 1,506 $ 27,638 $ 145 $ 43,731
OAEM
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard
- 26 - - - - - - 26
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - 1 - - 1
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Consumer
$ 3,680 $ 5,723 $ 4,042 $ 498 $ 525 $ 1,507 $ 27,638 $ 145 $ 43,758
* - Revolving loans include $506,000 in overdrawn demand deposit balances.
(continued)
34
Table of Contents
(continued)

Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year

Revolving

Revolving

loans

loans

(in thousands)

amortized

converted

June 30, 2020

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

cost basis

to term

Total

Leases

Risk rating

Pass
$ 1,692 $ 2,238 $ 2,495 $ 1,774 $ 3,272 $ 2,502 $ - $ - $ 13,973
OAEM
- - 34 - - 4 - - 38
Substandard
- - - - 832 - - - 832
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - - - - -
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Consumer
$ 1,692 $ 2,238 $ 2,529 $ 1,774 $ 4,104 $ 2,506 $ - $ - $ 14,843

Credit cards - commercial

Risk rating

Pass
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,862 $ - $ 8,862
OAEM
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard
- - - - - - - - -
Substandard non-performing
- - - - - - - - -
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Consumer
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,862 $ - $ 8,862

Total loans

Risk rating

Pass
$ 1,197,796 $ 597,341 $ 445,817 $ 299,651 $ 233,195 $ 238,886 $ 361,245 $ 22,976 $ 3,396,907
OAEM
61 2,590 12,680 985 1,913 237 1,255 - 19,721
Substandard
9,465 10,927 1,394 223 1,149 438 9,591 - 33,187
Substandard non-performing
9,727 - 20 1,215 47 2,810 - 443 14,262
Doubtful
- - - - - - - - -
Total Loans
$ 1,217,049 $ 610,858 $ 459,911 $ 302,074 $ 236,304 $ 242,371 $ 372,091 $ 23,419 $ 3,464,077
Bancorp considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the ACL. For certain loan classes, such as credit cards, credit quality is evaluated based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in commercial credit cards based on payment activity:

June, 30

(in thousands)

2020

Credit cards - commercial

Performing
$ 8,862
Non-performing
—
Total credit cards - commercial
$ 8,862
35
Table of Contents
Internally assigned risk ratings of loans by loan portfolio class classification category as of December 31, 2019 follows:
(in thousands)

Substandard

Total

December 31, 2019

Pass

OAEM

Substandard

Non-performing

Doubtful

Loans

Commercial and industrial
$ 840,105 $ 704 $ 21,500 $ 8,202 $ — $ 870,511
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
213,822 — — — — 213,822
Undeveloped land
46,360 — — — — 46,360

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
722,747 6,459 6,275 1,137 — 736,618
Owner occupied commercial
460,981 1,375 9,050 2,377 — 473,783
1-4 family residential
332,294 1,701 122 241 — 334,358
Home equity - first lien
48,620 — — — — 48,620
Home equity - junior lien
73,273 — 17 187 — 73,477
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,637,915 9,535 15,464 3,942 — 1,666,856

Consumer
47,429 — 38 — — 47,467

Total
$ 2,785,631 $ 10,239 $ 37,002 $ 12,144 $ — $ 2,845,016
Troubled Debt ~~Securities Acquired~~Restructurings
Detail of outstanding TDRs included in total non-performing loans follows:

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Specific

Additional

Specific

Additional

reserve

commitment

reserve

commitment

(in thousands)

Balance

allocation

to lend

Balance

allocation

to lend

Commercial and industrial - term
$ 19 $ 19 $ — $ 21 $ 21 $ —
Residential real estate
— — — 13 13 —
Consumer
26 26 — — — —

Total TDRs
$ 45 $ 45 $ — $ 34 $ 34 $ —
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No.2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The amendments in this update provide optional guidance for a limited period to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. It provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Bancorp is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In accordance with ~~Deteriorated~~Section 4013 of the CARES Act and in response to requests from borrowers who experienced business or personal cash flow interruptions related to the pandemic, Bancorp executed a payment deferral program. Depending on the demonstrated need of the customer, Bancorp deferred either the full loan payment or the interest only portion of respective loan payments for 90 or 180 days.  As of June 30, 2020, Bancorp executed 1,100 of full payment deferrals (predominantly three months) on outstanding loan balances of $502 million - representing 18% of the loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans). Approximately 85% of the total deferrals processed (in terms of dollars) occurred in the month of April, with the subsequent pace slowing significantly. Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals were not classified as TDRs and not included in non-performing loan statistics. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter and through July, a significant portion of the deferred loan portfolio returned to full paying status. As of July 31, 2020, Bancorp estimates that 10% of the total loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) remained in full payment deferment status. Bancorp is monitoring loan modification expirations daily and anticipates the potential for more customers to return to full payment status over the next two months as their initial deferral period ends.
36
Table of Contents
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, there were 0 loans modified as TDRs and there were no payment defaults of existing TDRs within 12 months following the modification. Default is determined at 90 or more days past due, charge-off, or foreclosure.
At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Bancorp had $177,000 and $239,000, respectively, in residential real estate loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.
Purchased Credit ~~Quality.~~Impaired Loans (Prior to the Adoption of ASC 326)

Management utilized the following criteria in determining which loans were classified as PCI ~~criteria~~loans for ~~the~~its ~~May 1,~~ 2019~~King~~ acquisition:
~~●     Loans assigned a non-accretable mark~~
●     Loans classified by management as substandard, doubtful or loss
●     Loans classified as non-accrual when acquired
●     Loans past due 90 days or more when acquired
●     Loans for which management assigned a non-accretable mark
18

~~Table of Contents~~

The ~~following table reconciles~~Bank acquired $1.6 million in PCI loans in connection with its 2019 acquisition. Under ASC 310-30, the non-accretable amount attributed to these loans equaled the contractually required principal at acquisition date and ~~carrying amounts~~as of ~~all PCI loans:~~
In thousands

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Contractually-required principal
$ 1,864 $ 432
Non-accretable amount
(1,577 ) —
Accretable amount
(57 ) (68 )
Carrying value of loans
$ 230 $ 364
June 30, 2020.

The following table presents a ~~rollforward~~roll forward of the accretable amount ~~on all~~of PCI ~~loans:~~loans acquired in its 2013 acquisition:

Three months ended

Six months ended

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

(in thousands)

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

Balance, beginning of period
$ (62 ) $ (95 ) $ (68 ) $ (106 ) $ (62 ) $ (68 )
Transfers between non-accretable and accretable
— — — — — —
Net accretion into interest income on loans, including loan fees
5 10 11 21 5 11
Generated from acquisition of King
— — — —
Balance, end of period
$ (57 ) $ (85 ) $ (57 ) $ (85 ) $ (57 ) $ (57 )

Consistent with regulatory guidance, Bancorp categorizes loans into credit risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends. Pass-rated loans included all risk-rated loans other than those classified as other assets especially mentioned, substandard, and doubtful, which are defined below:
●
~~Other assets especially mentioned (“OAEM”): Loans classified as OAEM have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. These potential weaknesses~~ ~~may~~ ~~result in deterioration of repayment prospects for the loan or of Bancorp's credit position at some future date.~~
●
Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the paying capacity of the obligor or of collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize ultimate repayment of the debt. Default is a distinct possibility if the deficiencies are ~~not~~ ~~corrected.~~
●
Substandard non-performing: Loans classified as substandard non-performing have all the characteristics of substandard loans and have been placed on non-accrual status or have been accounted for as troubled debt restructurings. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when prospects for recovering both principal and accrued interest are considered doubtful or when a default of principal or interest has existed for 90 ~~days or more.~~
●
Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or repayment in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.
19
37
Table of Contents
~~Internally assigned risk grades of loans by loan portfolio class classification category follows:~~
(In thousands)

Substandard

Total

June 30, 2019

Pass

OAEM

Substandard

non-performing

Doubtful

loans

Commercial and industrial
$ 817,645 $ 23,907 $ 18,241 $ 292 $ — $ 860,085
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
222,632 — — — — 222,632
Undeveloped land
35,169 — — — — 35,169

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
687,304 4,202 4,213 702 — 696,421
Owner occupied commercial
429,070 17,757 4,228 1,664 — 452,719
1-4 family residential
336,312 1,686 159 800 — 338,957
Home equity - first lien
46,012 — — — — 46,012
Home equity - junior lien
67,236 224 18 470 — 67,948
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,565,934 23,869 8,618 3,636 — 1,602,057

Consumer
43,937 — — — — 43,937

Total
$ 2,685,317 $ 47,776 $ 26,859 $ 3,928 $ — $ 2,763,880

December 31, 2018

Commercial and industrial
$ 803,073 $ 11,516 $ 18,703 $ 232 $ — $ 833,524
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
220,532 4,200 — 318 — 225,050
Undeveloped land
29,618 — — 474 — 30,092

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
586,543 1,815 15 237 — 588,610
Owner occupied commercial
411,722 9,030 4,500 1,121 — 426,373
1-4 family residential
273,537 1,544 162 774 — 276,017
Home equity - first lien
49,500 — — — — 49,500
Home equity - junior lien
70,437 249 19 242 — 70,947
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,391,739 12,638 4,696 2,374 — 1,411,447

Consumer
48,058 — — — — 48,058

Total
$ 2,493,020 $ 28,354 $ 23,399 $ 3,398 $ — $ 2,548,171
20

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table presents the activity in the allowance by loan portfolio class:~~

Type of loan

Construction

and development,

Three months ended

Commercial

excluding

and

undeveloped

Undeveloped

Real estate

(In thousands)

industrial

land

land

mortgage

Consumer

Total

Balance, April 1, 2019
$ 11,762 $ 1,884 $ 662 $ 12,001 $ 155 $ 26,464
Provision (credit)
92 (74 ) (61 ) 10 33 -
Charge-offs
— — — (13 ) (148 ) (161 )
Recoveries
4 — — 32 77 113
Balance, June 30, 2019
$ 11,858 $ 1,810 $ 601 $ 12,030 $ 117 $ 26,416

Construction

and development,

Commercial

excluding

and

undeveloped

Undeveloped

Real estate

(In thousands)

industrial

land

land

mortgage

Consumer

Total

Balance, April 1, 2018
$ 10,638 $ 2,020 $ 482 $ 10,707 $ 356 $ 24,203
Provision (credit)
2,008 (82 ) 19 (795 ) 85 1,235
Charge-offs
(530 ) — — — (117 ) (647 )
Recoveries
2 — — 2 78 82
Balance, June 30, 2018
$ 12,118 $ 1,938 $ 501 $ 9,914 $ 402 $ 24,873

Type of loan

Construction

and development,

Six months ended

Commercial

excluding

and

undeveloped

Undeveloped

Real estate

(In thousands)

industrial

land

land

mortgage

Consumer

Total

Balance, January 1, 2019
$ 11,965 $ 1,760 $ 752 $ 10,681 $ 376 $ 25,534
Provision (credit)
(210 ) (153 ) (151 ) 1,310 (196 ) 600
Charge-offs
(3 ) — — (13 ) (244 ) (260 )
Recoveries
106 203 — 52 181 542
Balance, June 30, 2019
$ 11,858 $ 1,810 $ 601 $ 12,030 $ 117 $ 26,416

Construction

and development,

Commercial

excluding

and

undeveloped

Undeveloped

Real estate

(In thousands)

industrial

land

land

mortgage

Consumer

Total

Balance, January 1, 2018
$ 11,276 $ 1,724 $ 521 $ 11,012 $ 352 $ 24,885
Provision (credit)
2,769 214 (20 ) (1,104 ) 111 1,970
Charge-offs
(1,939 ) — — — (236 ) (2,175 )
Recoveries
12 — — 6 175 193
Balance, June 30, 2018
$ 12,118 $ 1,938 $ 501 $ 9,914 $ 402 $ 24,873
21

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The considerations by Bancorp in computing its allowance are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. Relevant risk characteristics are as follows:~~
●
Commercial and industrial: Loans in this category are made to businesses. Generally these loans are secured by assets of the business and repayment is expected from cash flows of the business. A decline in the strength of the business or a weakened economy and resultant decreased consumer and/or business spending ~~may~~ ~~have an effect on the credit quality in this loan category.~~
●
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land: Loans in this category primarily include owner-occupied and investment construction loans and commercial development projects. In most cases, construction loans require only interest to be paid during the construction period. Upon completion or stabilization, the construction loans generally convert to permanent financing in the real estate mortgage segment, requiring principal amortization. Repayment of development loans is derived from sale of lots or units. Credit risk is affected by construction delays, cost overruns, market conditions and availability of permanent financing; to the extent such permanent financing is ~~not~~ ~~being provided by Bancorp.~~
●
~~Undeveloped land: Loans in this category are secured by land acquired for development by the borrower, but for which~~ no development has yet taken place. Credit risk is primarily dependent upon the financial strength of the borrower, but can also be affected by market conditions and time to sell lots at an adequate price in the future. Credit risk is also affected by availability of permanent financing, including to the end user, to the extent such permanent financing is ~~not~~ ~~being provided by Bancorp.~~
●
Real estate mortgage: Loans in this category are made to and secured by owner-occupied residential real estate, owner-occupied real estate used for business purposes, and income-producing investment properties. Underlying properties are generally located in Bancorp's primary market areas. A decline in the strength of the borrower or a weakened economy ~~may~~ have an effect on the credit quality of this type of loan. For owner occupied residential and owner-occupied commercial real estate, repayment is dependent on financial strength of the borrower. For income-producing investment properties, repayment is dependent on financial strength of tenants, and to a lesser extent the borrowers’ financial strength, once the project is stabilized. Cash flows of income producing investment properties ~~may~~ be adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as reflected by increased vacancy rates, which in turn, will have an effect on credit quality and property values. Overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and real estate prices, has an effect on credit quality in this loan category.
●
~~Consumer: Loans in this category~~ ~~may~~ be either secured or unsecured and repayment is dependent on credit quality of the individual borrower and, if applicable, adequacy of collateral securing the loan. Therefore, overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates, as well as home and securities prices, will have a significant effect on credit quality in this loan category.
Impaired loans include non-accrual loans and accruing loans accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), which continue to accrue interest. Non-performing loans include the balance of impaired loans plus any loans over 90 ~~days past due and still accruing interest.~~
22

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The following table presents the recorded investment in non-accrual loans:~~
(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Commercial and industrial
$ 96 $ 192
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— 318
Undeveloped land
— 474

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
305 138
Owner occupied commercial
1,444 586
1-4 family residential
715 760
Home equity - first lien
— —
Home equity - junior lien
470 143
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
2,934 1,627
Consumer
— —
Total non-accrual loans
$ 3,030 $ 2,611
~~In the course of working with borrowers, Bancorp~~ ~~may~~ elect to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. TDRs occur when, for economic, legal, or other reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, Bancorp grants a concession to the borrower that it would ~~not~~ ~~otherwise consider. Bancorp did~~ ~~not~~ ~~recognize new TDRs, nor did any TDRs default, in the~~ ~~three~~ ~~and~~ ~~six~~ ~~months periods ended~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~2018.~~ ~~Detail of outstanding TDRs follows:~~

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

(In thousands)

Specific

Additional

Specific

Additional

reserve

commitment

reserve

commitment

TDRs

Balance

allocation

to lend

Balance

allocation

to lend

Commercial and industrial
$ 23 $ 23 $ — $ 28 $ 28 $ —
1-4 family residential
14 14 — 14 14 —

Total TDRs
$ 37 $ 37 $ — $ 42 $ 42 $ —
~~As of~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~formal foreclosure proceedings were in process on~~ 1-4 ~~family residential mortgage loans with a total recorded investment of $795 thousand, as compared with $528 thousand as of~~ ~~December 31, 2018.~~
23

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The following tables present the balance in the recorded investment in loans and allowance for loans by portfolio loan class and based on impairment evaluation method:~~
(In thousands)

Loans

Allowance

June 30, 2019

Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment

Loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment

Loans acquired
with deteriorated
credit quality

Total loans

Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment

Loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment

Loans acquired
with deteriorated
credit quality

Total allowance

Commercial and industrial
$ 119 $ 859,966 $ — $ 860,085 $ 23 $ 11,835 $ — $ 11,858
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— 222,632 — 222,632 — 1,810 — 1,810
Undeveloped land
— 35,169 — 35,169 — 601 — 601
Real estate mortgage
2,948 1,599,109 — 1,602,057 14 12,016 — 12,030
Consumer
— 43,937 — 43,937 — 117 — 117

Total
$ 3,067 $ 2,760,813 $ — $ 2,763,880 $ 37 $ 26,379 $ — $ 26,416

(In thousands)

Loans

Allowance

December 31, 2018

Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment

Loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment

Loans acquired
with deteriorated
credit quality

Total loans

Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment

Loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment

Loans acquired
with deteriorated
credit quality

Total allowance

Commercial and industrial
$ 220 $ 833,304 $ — $ 833,524 $ 28 $ 11,937 $ — $ 11,965
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
318 224,732 — 225,050 — 1,760 — 1,760
Undeveloped land
474 29,618 — 30,092 — 752 — 752
Real estate mortgage
1,641 1,409,806 — 1,411,447 14 10,667 — 10,681
Consumer
— 48,058 — 48,058 — 376 — 376

Total
$ 2,653 $ 2,545,518 $ — $ 2,548,171 $ 42 $ 25,492 $ — $ 25,534
24

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan portfolio class:~~

As of

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

Unpaid

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

Recorded

principal

Related

recorded

income

recorded

income

(In thousands)

investment

balance

allowance

investment

recognized

investment

recognized

Impaired loans with no related allowance:

Commercial and industrial
$ 96 $ 96 $ — $ 144 $ — $ 160 $ —
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — — — — 106 —
Undeveloped land
— — — — — 158 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
306 306 — 311 — 254 —
Owner occupied commercial
1,444 1,882 — 1,455 — 1,165 —
1-4 family residential
715 715 — 779 — 773 —
Home equity - first lien
— - — — — — —
Home equity - junior lien
469 469 — 462 — 356 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
2,934 3,372 — 3,007 — 2,548 —

Consumer
— — — — — — —
Subtotal
$ 3,030 $ 3,468 $ — $ 3,151 $ — $ 2,972 $ —

Impaired loans with an allowance:

Commercial and industrial
$ 23 $ 23 $ 23 $ 24 $ — $ 26 $ 1
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — — — — — —
Undeveloped land
— — — — — — —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
— — — — — — —
Owner occupied commercial
— — — — — — —
1-4 family residential
14 14 14 14 — 14 —
Home equity - first lien
— — — — — — —
Home equity - junior lien
— — — — — — —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
14 14 14 14 — 14 —

Consumer
— — — — — — —
Subtotal
$ 37 $ 37 $ 37 $ 38 $ — $ 40 $ 1

Total:

Commercial and industrial
$ 119 $ 119 $ 23 $ 168 $ — $ 186 $ 1
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — — — — 106 —
Undeveloped land
— — — — — 158 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
306 306 — 311 — 254 —
Owner occupied commercial
1,444 1,882 — 1,455 — 1,165 —
1-4 family residential
729 729 14 793 — 787 —
Home equity - first lien
— — — - — - —
Home equity - junior lien
469 469 — 462 — 356 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
2,948 3,386 14 3,021 — 2,562 —

Consumer
— — — — — — —
Total impaired loans
$ 3,067 $ 3,505 $ 37 $ 3,189 $ — $ 3,012 $ 1
25

~~Table of Contents~~

As of

Three months ended

Six months ended

December 31, 2018

June 30, 2018

June 30, 2018

Unpaid

Average

Interest

Average

Interest

Recorded

principal

Related

recorded

income

recorded

income

(In thousands)

investment

balance

allowance

investment

recognized

investment

recognized

Impaired loans with no related allowance:

Commercial and industrial
$ 192 $ 707 $ — $ 225 $ — $ 531 $ —
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
318 489 — 525 — 571 —
Undeveloped land
474 506 — 474 — 474 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
138 138 — - — 17 —
Owner occupied commercial
586 1,023 — 2,335 — 2,667 —
1-4 family residential
760 760 — 1,350 — 1,446 —
Home equity - first lien
— - — - — - —
Home equity - junior lien
143 143 — 17 — 22 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,627 2,064 — 3,702 — 4,152 —

Consumer
— — — 46 — 30 —
Subtotal
$ 2,611 $ 3,766 $ — $ 4,972 $ — $ 5,758 $ —

Impaired loans with an allowance:

Commercial and industrial
$ 28 $ 28 $ 28 $ 3,074 $ — $ 2,061 $ —
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — — — — — —
Undeveloped land
— — — 48 — 32 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
— — — — — — —
Owner occupied commercial
— — — 1,645 — 1,097 —
1-4 family residential
14 14 14 14 — 14 —
Home equity - first lien
— — — — — — —
Home equity - junior lien
— — — — — — —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
14 14 14 1,659 — 1,111 —

Consumer
— — — — — — —
Subtotal
$ 42 $ 42 $ 42 $ 4,781 $ — $ 3,204 $ —

Total:

Commercial and industrial
$ 220 $ 735 $ 28 $ 3,299 $ — $ 2,592 $ —
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
318 489 — 525 — 571 —
Undeveloped land
474 506 — 522 — 506 —

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
138 138 — - — 17 —
Owner occupied commercial
586 1,023 — 3,980 — 3,764 —
1-4 family residential
774 774 14 1,364 — 1,460 —
Home equity - first lien
— — — - — - —
Home equity - junior lien
143 143 — 17 — 22 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,641 2,078 14 5,361 — 5,263 —

Consumer
— — — 46 — 30 —
Total impaired loans
$ 2,653 $ 3,808 $ 42 $ 9,753 $ — $ 8,962 $ —
~~Differences between recorded investment amounts and unpaid principal balance amounts less related allowance are due to partial charge-offs which have occurred over the lives of certain loans.~~
26

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in loans by portfolio class:~~

Recorded

(In thousands)

90 or more

investment

days past due

> 90 days

30-59 days

60-89 days

(includes all

Total

Total

and

June 30, 2019

Current

past due

past due

non-accrual)

past due

loans

accruing

Commercial and industrial
$ 858,853 $ 572 $ 391 $ 269 $ 1,232 $ 860,085 $ 173
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
222,632 — — — — 222,632 —
Undeveloped land
35,169 — — — — 35,169 —

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
692,612 1 3,107 701 3,809 696,421 396
Owner occupied commercial
450,140 643 272 1,664 2,579 452,719 220
1-4 family residential
336,548 749 873 787 2,409 338,957 72
Home equity - first lien
45,963 49 — — 49 46,012 —
Home equity - junior lien
67,408 70 — 470 540 67,948 —
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,592,671 1,512 4,252 3,622 9,386 1,602,057 688

Consumer
43,901 9 27 — 36 43,937 —

Total
$ 2,753,226 $ 2,093 $ 4,670 $ 3,891 $ 10,654 $ 2,763,880 $ 861

December 31, 2018

Commercial and industrial
$ 832,923 $ 197 $ 200 $ 204 $ 601 $ 833,524 $ 12
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
224,732 — — 318 318 225,050 —
Undeveloped land
29,552 66 — 474 540 30,092 —

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
586,884 1,382 107 237 1,726 588,610 99
Owner occupied commercial
421,143 2,732 1,377 1,121 5,230 426,373 535
1-4 family residential
274,547 374 336 760 1,470 276,017 —
Home equity - first lien
49,321 179 — — 179 49,500 —
Home equity - junior lien
70,467 182 56 242 480 70,947 99
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,402,362 4,849 1,876 2,360 9,085 1,411,447 733

Consumer
48,058 — — — — 48,058 —

Total
$ 2,537,627 $ 5,112 $ 2,076 $ 3,356 $ 10,544 $ 2,548,171 $ 745
27

~~Table of Contents~~

(5)
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill ~~recorded on~~and intangible assets consist of the ~~acquisition date of an entity,~~following:
(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Goodwill
$ 12,513 $ 12,513
Core deposit intangibles
2,122 2,285
Mortgage servicing rights
1,888 1,372
Goodwill represents ~~$12.1~~$11.8 million related to the May 1, 2019 ~~King~~ acquisition and ~~$682 thousand~~$682,000 related to the 1996 purchase of a bank in southern Indiana. ~~As provided~~See the footnote titled “Acquisition” for ~~under GAAP,~~ further details. Related to the May 2019 acquisition, effective March 31, 2020, management ~~has up to~~ 12 ~~months following the date of acquisition to finalize~~finalized the fair values of the acquired assets and assumed ~~liabilities. During this measurement period, Bancorp~~liabilities ahead of the ~~may~~ 12~~record subsequent adjustments to goodwill for provisional amounts recorded at the acquisition date.~~ months as allowed by GAAP.

~~The goodwill balance at~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~relates entirely to the Commercial Banking segment of Bancorp.~~ GAAP requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives not be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually. Impairment exists when a reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value. Bancorp’s annual goodwill impairment test is conducted as of ~~December 31~~September 30 of each year or more often as situations dictate. At ~~December 31, 2018,~~September 30, 2019, Bancorp’s Commercial Banking reporting unit had positive equity and Bancorp elected to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it was more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, including goodwill. The qualitative assessment indicated that it was not more-likely-than-not that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Therefore, Bancorp did not complete the two-step impairment test as of ~~December~~September 30, 2019. As of March 31, ~~2018.~~2020 and June 30, 2020, consistent with market volatility and uncertain economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, interim impairment testing was conducted and indicated that it was not more-likely-than-not that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeded its fair value.

Changes in the carrying value of goodwill follows:

Three months ended

Six months ended

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

(in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Balance at beginning of period
$ 682 $ 682 $ 682 $ 682 $ 12,513 $ 682 $ 12,513 $ 682
Goodwill acquired
12,144 — 12,144 — — 12,144 — 12,144
Recast adjustments
— — — —
Impairment
— — — — — — — —
Balance at end of period
$ 12,826 $ 682 $ 12,826 $ 682 $ 12,513 $ 12,826 $ 12,513 $ 12,826

~~The Company~~Bancorp recorded ~~core deposit intangible~~CDI assets of $1.5 million and $2.5 million in association with its May 1, 2019 ~~King~~ and 2013 ~~TBOC acquisitions, respectively.~~acquisitions. See the footnote titled “Acquisition” for further details.

~~Details regarding the King acquisition are discussed in the Acquisitions footnote.~~ Changes in the net carrying amount of ~~core deposit intangibles follow:~~CDIs follows:

Three months ended

Six months ended

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

(in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Balance at beginning of period
$ 1,015 $ 1,182 $ 1,056 $ 1,225 $ 2,203 $ 1,015 $ 2,285 $ 1,056
Core deposit intangible acquired
1,519 — 1,519 — — 1,519 — 1,519
Amortization
(73 ) (43 ) (114 ) (86 ) (81 ) (73 ) (163 ) (114 )

Balance at end of period
$ 2,461 $ 1,139 $ 2,461 $ 1,139 $ 2,122 $ 2,461 $ 2,122 $ 2,461

38
Table of Contents

~~Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”),~~MSRs, a component of other assets, are initially recognized at fair value when mortgage loans are sold with servicing retained. The MSRs are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, considering appropriate prepayment assumptions. MSRs are evaluated quarterly for impairment by comparing carrying value to fair value. ~~Estimated~~Fair value is based on a valuation model that calculates the PV of estimated net servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income.
The estimated fair ~~values~~value of MSRs at both June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$2.9 million~~ $3 million. There was 0 valuation allowance for MSRs as of June 30, 2020 and ~~$3.6 million, respectively.~~December 31, 2019, as fair value exceeded carrying value.
Changes in the net carrying amount of MSRs follows:

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Balance at beginning of period
$ 1,446 $ 1,070 $ 1,372 $ 1,022
Additions for mortgage loans sold
511 134 641 214
Amortization
(69 ) (36 ) (125 ) (68 )
Impairment
— — — —
Balance at end of period
$ 1,888 $ 1,168 $ 1,888 $ 1,168

Total outstanding principal balances of loans serviced for others were ~~$325.1~~$349 million and ~~$327.9~~$327 million at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

28
39

Table of Contents
~~Changes in the net carrying amount of MSRs follows:~~

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

Balance at beginning of period
$ 1,070 $ 861 $ 1,022 $ 875
Additions for mortgage loans sold
134 74 214 95
Amortization
(36 ) (37 ) (68 ) (72 )

Balance at end of period
$ 1,168 $ 898 $ 1,168 $ 898

(6)
Income Taxes
Components of income tax expense (benefit) from operations follow:

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Current income tax expense:

Federal
$ 4,363 $ 3,772 $ 6,205 $ 6,498
State
209 189 340 330
Total current income tax expense
4,572 3,961 6,545 6,828

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

Federal
(1,798 ) 224 (1,146 ) 789
State
(427 ) (3,155 ) (803 ) (4,768 )
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
(2,225 ) (2,931 ) (1,949 ) (3,979 )
Change in valuation allowance
1 — 2 20
Total income tax expense
$ 2,348 $ 1,030 $ 4,598 $ 2,869
An analysis of the difference between the statutory and ETR from operations follows:

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

2020

2019

2020

2019

U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
21.0
%
21.0
%
21.0
%
21.0
%
Tax credits
(5.9 ) (0.7 ) (5.9 ) (0.7 )
Kentucky state income tax enactments
(1.7 ) (14.1 ) (1.9 ) (10.7 )
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance
(2.0 ) (0.6 ) (0.4 ) (0.9 )
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements
(0.4 ) (0.4 ) - (1.1 )
Tax exempt interest income
(0.2 ) (0.3 ) (0.3 ) (0.3 )
Other, net
3.5 0.2 1.4 0.1
Effective tax rate
14.9
%
5.9
%
14.7
%
8.2
%
Current state income tax expense represents tax owed to the state of Indiana. Kentucky and Ohio state bank taxes are currently based on capital levels and are recorded as other non-interest expense.
The ETR at June 30, 2020 includes one-half of the anticipated full year impact of a large historic tax credit project scheduled to be placed in service later in 2020.

In March 2019, the Kentucky Legislature passed HB354 requiring financial institutions to transition from a capital based franchise tax to the Kentucky corporate income tax beginning in 2021. Historically, the franchise tax, a component of non-interest expenses, was assessed at 1.1% of net capital and averaged $2.5 million annually over the prior two year-end periods. The Kentucky corporate income tax will be assessed at 5% of Kentucky taxable income and will be included as a component of current and deferred state income tax expense. Associated with this change, predominantly during the first quarter of 2019, Bancorp established a Kentucky state ~~deferred tax asset~~DTA related to existing temporary differences estimated to reverse after the effective date of the law change. Bancorp recorded a corresponding state tax benefit, net of federal tax impact of $1.3 million, or approximately $0.06 per diluted share for ~~the~~ ~~first~~ ~~quarter~~ 2019. While this is positive in the short-term, Bancorp anticipates an unfavorable impact of approximately ~~$200 thousand~~$200,000 per year beginning in 2021.

In April 2019, the Kentucky ~~legislature~~Legislature passed HB458 allowing ~~banks and their holding companies~~entities filing a combined Kentucky income return to ~~be combined together for Kentucky~~share certain tax ~~return filings.~~attributes, including net operating loss carryforwards. The combined filing beginning in 2021will allow Bancorp’s ~~holding company~~ net operating ~~losses~~loss carryforwards to offset against net revenue generated by ~~The~~the Bank up to 50% of the Bank’s Kentucky taxable income and reduce Bancorp’s tax liability. Bancorp recorded sa state tax benefit, ~~associated with this change~~net of federal tax impact of $2.4 million, predominantly in the second quarter of 2019, or approximately $0.11 per diluted share for ~~the~~ ~~three~~2019. ~~and~~ ~~six~~ ~~month periods ended~~ ~~June 30, 2019.~~
~~Components of~~The losses are expected to be utilized when Bancorp begins filing a combined Kentucky income tax ~~expense (benefit) from operations follow:~~

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

Current income tax expense:

Federal
$ 3,772 $ 3,426 $ 6,498 $ 5,862
State
189 182 330 310
Total current income tax expense
3,961 3,608 6,828 6,172

Deferred income tax expense (benefit) :

Federal
224 (421 ) 789 46
State
(3,155 ) (28 ) (4,768 ) (7 )
Total deferred income tax expense
(2,931 ) (449 ) (3,979 ) 39
Change in valuation allowance
— — 20 —
Total income tax expense
$ 1,030 $ 3,159 $ 2,869 $ 6,211
29

~~Table of Contents~~
~~An analysis of~~return. A valuation allowance is maintained for the ~~difference between statutory and effective income tax rates follows:~~

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

2019

2018

2019

2018

U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
21.0
%
21.0
%
21.0
%
21.0
%
Kentucky state income tax enactments
(14.1 ) — (10.7 ) —
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
(0.4 ) (1.2 ) (1.1 ) (1.5 )
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
(0.6 ) �� (1.2 ) (0.9 ) (0.6 )
Tax credits
(0.7 ) (0.7 ) (0.7 ) (0.5 )
Tax exempt interest income
(0.3 ) (0.5 ) (0.3 ) (0.5 )
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7
Other, net
0.2 0.8 0.1 0.1
Effective income tax rate
5.9
%
18.9
%
8.2
%
18.7
%
Currently, state income tax expense represents tax owed to the state of Indiana. Kentucky and Ohio state bank taxes are currently based on capital levels, and are recorded as other non-interest expense. See comment above regarding recent changesloss that will expire in ~~Kentucky tax law.~~2020.

GAAP provides guidance on financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, in tax returns. If recognized, tax benefits would reduce tax expense and accordingly, increase net income. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including adding amounts for current year tax positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of ~~examination,~~examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of ~~the Company.~~Bancorp. Federal and state income tax returns are subject to examination for the years after 2015.

40
Table of Contents

(7)
Deposits

The composition of the Bank’s deposits follows:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Non-interest bearing demand deposits
$ 777,652 $ 711,023 $ 1,205,253 $ 810,475

Interest bearing deposits:

Interest bearing demand
824,324 892,867 1,147,357 979,595
Savings
171,471 155,007 196,655 169,622
Money market
675,221 688,744 761,256 742,029

Time deposits of $250 thousand or more
71,952 55,182 76,954 81,412
Other time deposits(1)
362,833 291,533 339,681 350,805
Total time deposits
434,785 346,715 416,635 432,217

Total interest bearing deposits
2,105,801 2,083,333 2,521,903 2,323,463

Total deposits
$ 2,883,453 $ 2,794,356 $ 3,727,156 $ 3,133,938

(1)     Includes $30 million in brokered deposits as of both June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
~~Includes $29.8 million in brokered deposits as of both~~ ~~June 30~~, ~~2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018.~~

Deposits totaling ~~$125.5~~$126 million were acquired on May 1, 2019, associated with ~~the King~~an acquisition.

30

~~Table of Contents~~

(8)
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

SSUAR represent a funding source of Bancorp and are primarily used by commercial customers in conjunction with collateralized corporate cash management accounts. Such repurchase agreements are considered financing agreements and mature within one business day from the transaction date. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, all of these financing arrangements had overnight maturities and were secured by government sponsored enterprise obligations and government agency mortgage-backed securities ~~which~~that were owned and controlled by Bancorp.

Information concerning SSUAR follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

(dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Outstanding balance at end of period
$ 33,809 $ 36,094 $ 42,722 $ 31,895
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
0.31
%
0.24
%
0.08
%
0.22
%

Three months ended

Six months ended

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Average outstanding balance during the period
$ 39,969 $ 61,993 $ 38,755 $ 66,609 $ 41,517 $ 39,969 $ 37,465 $ 38,755
Average interest rate during the period
0.28
%
0.21
%
0.28
%
0.20 0.08
%
0.28
%
0.13
%
0.28
%
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the period
$ 43,160 $ 60,801 $ 43,160 $ 74,725 $ 42,722 $ 43,160 $ 42,722 $ 43,160

41
Table of Contents

(9)
~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB Advances

Bancorp had ~~outstanding 58~~49 separate advances totaling ~~$84.3~~$61 million outstanding as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 as compared with 1457 separate advances totaling ~~$48.2~~$80 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. As a result of the ~~King~~2019 acquisition, Bancorp assumed 46 advances totaling ~~$43.3~~$43 million, with maturities ~~ranging from~~ ~~2019~~extending to 2028. These advances were discounted to fair value as of the acquisition date. See the ~~acquisition~~ footnote titled “Acquisition” for further details. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, for 1610 advances totaling ~~$51~~$38 million, all of which are non-callable, interest payments are due monthly, with principal due at maturity. For the remaining advances, principal and interest payments are due monthly based on an amortization schedule.

The following is a summary of the contractual maturities and average effective rates of outstanding advances:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Maturity

Weighted average

Weighted average

Year

Advance

Fixed Rate

Advance

Fixed Rate

2019
$ 30,850 2.42
%
$ 30,000 2.54
%
2020
20,390 2.38 1,691 2.23
2021
2,561 2.46 215 2.12
2023
579 1.01 — —
2024
2,131 2.36 2,240 2.36
2025
4,192 2.42 4,626 2.42
2026
8,470 1.95 8,185 1.99
2027
8,771 1.75 — —
2028
6,335 2.38 1,220 1.49

Total
$ 84,279 2.28
%
$ 48,177 2.39
%
31

~~Table of Contents~~
(dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Maturity

Weighted average

Weighted average

Year

Advance

Fixed Rate

Advance

Fixed Rate

2020
$ 37,533 0.67
%
$ 50,004 1.99
%
2021
2,281 2.57 2,400 2.52
2022
— — — —
2023
360 1.01 456 1.00
2024
1,479 2.36 2,023 2.36
2025
3,055 2.43 3,774 2.41
2026
5,625 1.95 8,156 1.96
2027
6,323 1.75 7,445 1.73
2028
4,776 2.33 5,695 2.32

Total
$ 61,432 1.22
%
$ 79,953 2.02
%

FHLB advances are collateralized by certain ~~commercial~~CRE and residential real estate mortgage loans under a blanket mortgage collateral pledge ~~agreement~~agreements, as well as Bancorp’s PPP loan portfolio and FHLB stock. Bancorp views these advances ~~to be~~as an effective lower-costing alternative to brokered deposits to fund loan growth. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the amount of available credit from the FHLB totaled ~~$484.0~~$806 million and ~~$537.0~~$599 million, respectively. Bancorp also had $80 million and $105 million in ~~federal funds~~FFP lines available from correspondent banks at ~~both~~ June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019,
respectively, with the decrease resulting from the closing of an inactive correspondent relationship during the second quarter.

42
(10)
~~Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~
~~The following tables illustrate activity within the balances in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) by component:~~

Net unrealized

Net unrealized

Minimum

gains (losses)

gains (losses)

pension

Three months ended June 30, 2019

on securities

on cash

liability

(In thousands)

available for sale

flow hedges

adjustment

Total

Balance, beginning of period
$ (2,536 ) $ 234 $ (211 ) $ (2,513 )
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
3,827 (248 ) — 3,579
Balance, end of period
$ 1,291 $ (14 ) $ (211 ) $ 1,066

Three months ended June 30, 2018

Balance, beginning of period
$ (5,995 ) $ 544 $ (393 ) $ (5,844 )
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
(1,279 ) 79 — (1,200 )
Balance, end of period
$ (7,274 ) $ 623 $ (393 ) $ (7,044 )
32

Table of Contents

Net unrealized

Net unrealized

Minimum

gains (losses)

gains (losses)

pension

Six months ended June 30, 2019

on securities

on cash

liability

(In thousands)

available for sale

flow hedges

adjustment

Total

Balance, beginning of period
$ (5,330 ) $ 408 $ (220 ) $ (5,142 )
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
6,621 (422 ) 9 6,208
Balance, end of period
$ 1,291 $ (14 ) $ (211 ) $ 1,066

Six months ended June 30, 2018

Balance, beginning of period
$ (1,781 ) $ 193 $ (342 ) $ (1,930 )
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
(4,997 ) 389 — $ (4,608 )
Reclassification adjustment for adoption of ASU 2018-02
(496 ) 41 (51 ) (506 )
Balance, end of period
$ (7,274 ) $ 623 $ (393 ) $ (7,044 )

(11)
~~Preferred Stock~~
Bancorp has a class of preferred stock (no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized), the relative rights, preferences and other terms of which or any series within the class will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to any issuance. None of this stock has been issued to date.
(12)
~~Net Income Per Share~~
~~The following table reflects, for the~~ ~~three~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~2018,~~ ~~net income (numerator) and average shares outstanding (denominator) for basic and diluted net income per share computations:~~

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(In thousands, except per share data)

2019

2018

2019

2018

Net income
$ 16,543 $ 13,579 $ 32,184 $ 26,983

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
22,689 22,625 22,675 22,601
Dilutive securities
260 342 273 358
Weighted average shares outstanding- diluted
22,949 22,967 22,948 22,959

Net income per share, basic
$ 0.73 $ 0.60 $ 1.42 $ 1.19
Net income per share, diluted
0.72 0.59 1.40 1.17
33

~~Table of Contents~~
~~Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) excluded from the earnings per share calculation because their impact was antidilutive follows:~~

Three

Six

months ended

months ended

(In thousands)

June 30,

June 30,

2019

2018

2019

2018

Antidilutive SARs
200 93 200 93
~~These shares while antidilutive, could however, be dilutive to earnings per share (“EPS”) in the future.~~
(13)
~~Defined Benefit Plan~~
~~Bancorp sponsors an unfunded, non-qualified, defined benefit retirement plan for three key officers (one current and two retired), and has~~ no plans to increase the number of or benefits to participants. All participants are fully vested. Actuarially determined pension costs are expensed and accrued over the service period, and benefits are paid from Bancorp’s assets. Bancorp maintains life insurance policies, for which it is the beneficiary, on participants and certain former executives. Income from these policies is utilized to offset costs of benefits. Net periodic benefit cost was immaterial for all respective periods.
(14)
~~Stock-Based Compensation~~
~~The fair value of all stock-based awards granted, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as compensation expense over the respective service period.~~
~~At Bancorp's~~ ~~2015~~ ~~Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders approved the~~ ~~2015~~ ~~Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan and authorized the shares available from the expiring~~ ~~2005~~ ~~plan for future awards under the~~ ~~2015~~ ~~plan. In~~ ~~2018~~ ~~shareholders approved an additional 500 thousand shares for issuance under the plan. As of~~ ~~June 30, 2019,~~ ~~there were 505 thousand shares available for future awards.~~
S~~tock~~ O~~ptions~~ – ~~Bancorp had no stock options outstanding as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018.~~
~~SARs~~ – ~~SARs granted have a vesting schedule of 20% per year and expire~~ 10 ~~years after the grant date unless forfeited due to employment termination.~~
Fair values of SARs are estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, a leading formula for calculating such value. This model requires the input of assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. The following assumptions were used in SAR valuations at the grant date in each year:

2019

2018

Dividend yield
2.54 % 2.56 %
Expected volatility
20.39 % 20.17 %
Risk free interest rate
2.52 % 2.96 %
Expected life of SARs (in years)
7.2 7.0
Dividend yield and expected volatility are based on historical information for Bancorp corresponding to the expected life of SARs granted. Expected volatility is the volatility of the underlying shares for the expected term on a monthly basis. The risk free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the awards. The expected life of SARs is based on past experience of similar-life SARs. Bancorp evaluates historical exercise and post-vesting termination behavior when determining the expected life.
34

~~Table of Contents~~
~~Restricted~~ ~~stock awards (“RSAs”)~~ ~~– RSAs granted to officers vest over 5 years. For all grants prior to~~ ~~2015,~~ ~~grantees are entitled to dividend payments during the vesting period. For grants in~~ ~~2015~~ ~~and forward, forfeitable dividends are deferred until shares are vested. Fair value of RSAs is equal to the market value of the shares on the date of grant.~~
~~Grants of performance stock units (“PSUs”)~~ ~~– PSUs vest based upon service and a 3-year performance period, which begins~~ ~~January 1~~ ~~of the~~ ~~first~~ ~~year of the performance period. Because grantees are~~ ~~not~~ entitled to dividend payments during the performance period, the fair value of these PSUs is estimated based upon the market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant, adjusted for non-payment of dividends. Grants require a 1 year post-vesting holding period and the fair value of such grants incorporates a liquidity discount related to the holding period of 4.1%, 4.3% and 5.1% for ~~2019,~~~~2018,~~ ~~and~~ ~~2017,~~ ~~respectively.~~
~~Grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”)~~ – RSUs are only granted to non-employee directors, are time-based and vest 12 months after grant date. Because grantees are entitled to deferred dividend payments at the end of the vesting period, fair value of the RSUs equals market value of underlying shares on the date of grant.
~~Bancorp utilized cash of $272 thousand during the~~ ~~first~~~~six~~ ~~months of~~ ~~2019~~ ~~for the purchase of shares upon the vesting of RSUs. This compares with cash used of $155 thousand during the~~ ~~first~~~~six~~ ~~months of~~ ~~2018~~ ~~for the purchase of shares.~~
~~In the~~ ~~first~~ ~~quarter of~~ ~~2019,~~ ~~Bancorp awarded 9,834 RSUs to non-employee directors of Bancorp with a grant date fair value of $330 thousand.~~
35

~~Table of Contents~~
~~Bancorp has recognized stock-based compensation expense for SARs, RSAs, and PSUs within compensation expense, and RSUs for directors within other non-interest expense, as follows:~~

Three months ended June 30, 2019

(In thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 86 $ 306 $ 83 $ 518 $ 993
Deferred tax benefit
(18 ) (65 ) (17 ) (109 ) (209 )
Total net expense
$ 68 $ 241 $ 66 $ 409 $ 784

Three months ended June 30, 2018

(In thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 77 $ 275 $ 62 $ 798 $ 1,212
Deferred tax benefit
(16 ) (58 ) (13 ) (167 ) (254 )
Total net expense
$ 61 $ 217 $ 49 $ 631 $ 958

Six months ended June 30, 2019

(In thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 170 $ 599 $ 164 $ 923 $ 1,856
Deferred tax benefit
(36 ) (126 ) (34 ) (194 ) (390 )
Total net expense
$ 134 $ 473 $ 130 $ 729 $ 1,466

Six months ended June 30, 2018

(In thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 150 $ 551 $ 124 $ 1,210 $ 2,035
Deferred tax benefit
(32 ) (116 ) (26 ) (253 ) (427 )
Total net expense
$ 118 $ 435 $ 98 $ 957 $ 1,608
36

~~Table of Contents~~
~~As of~~ ~~June 30, 2019,~~ ~~Bancorp has $7.4 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense estimated to be recorded as follows:~~
(In thousands)

Year ended

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Remainder of 2019
$ 175 $ 599 $ 166 $ 999 $ 1,939
2020
306 1,049 2 1,325 2,682
2021
248 830 — 466 1,544
2022
193 559 — — 752
2023
118 308 — — 426
2024
11 25 — — 36
Total estimated expense
$ 1,051 $ 3,370 $ 168 $ 2,790 $ 7,379
~~The following table summarizes SARs activity and related information:~~

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

average

average

Aggregate

average

remaining

Exercise

exercise

intrinsic

fair

contractual

(In thousands, except per share data)

SARs

price

price

value(1)

value

life (in years)

Outstanding, January 1, 2018 704 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 19.51 $ 12,923 $ 3.47 5.1
Granted
100 35.90 - 39.32 37.75 — 6.07
Exercised
(73 ) 14.02 - 19.37 15.32 1,654 3.43
Forfeited
— - - — —
Outstanding, December 31, 2018 731 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 22.42 $ 8,422 $ 3.82 5.2

Outstanding, January 1, 2019 731 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 22.42 $ 8,422 $ 3.82
Granted
53 36.65 - 38.18 37.01 — 6.24
Exercised
(47 ) 14.02 - 22.96 17.16 830 3.62
Forfeited
— - - — —
Outstanding, June 30, 2019 737 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 23.79 $ 9,505 $ 4.01 5.0

Vested and exercisable 525 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 19.20 $ 8,975 $ 3.38 3.5
Unvested
212 22.96 - 40.00 35.14 530 5.58 8.5
Outstanding, June 30, 2019 737 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 23.79 $ 9,505 $ 4.01 5.0

Vested at June 30, 2019 79 $19.37 - $40.00 $ 27.39 $ 740 $ 4.55
(1) - In~~trinsic value for~~ ~~SARs is defined as the amount by which the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise~~ or ~~grant~~~~price.~~
37

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The following table summarizes activity for RSAs granted to officers:~~

Grant date

weighted

(In thousands, except per share data)

RSAs

average cost

Unvested at January 1, 2018
119 $ 27.62
Shares awarded
40 35.89
Restrictions lapsed and shares released
(44 ) 23.62
Shares forfeited
(5 ) 31.35
Unvested at December 31, 2018
110 $ 32.09

Unvested at January 1, 2019
110 $ 32.09
Shares awarded
39 34.88
Restrictions lapsed and shares released
(39 ) 28.70
Shares forfeited
— —
Unvested at June 30, 2019
110 $ 34.32

~~Expected shares to be awarded for PSUs granted to executive officers of Bancorp, the~~ ~~three~~~~-year performance period for which began~~ ~~January 1~~ ~~of the award year are as follows:~~

Vesting

Expected

Grant

period

Fair

shares to

year

in years

value

be awarded

2017
3 $ 35.66 61,893
2018
3 31.54 71,932
2019
3 32.03 43,602
(15)
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, Bancorp had various commitments outstanding that arose in the normal course of business ~~such as unused commitments or lines of credit and commitments made to lend in the future,~~ which are properly not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Total off balance sheet commitments to extend credit follows:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Commercial and Industrial
$ 381,824 $ 309,920
Construction - Commercial
224,641 163,314
Construction - Residential
15,631 16,050
Home Equity
154,030 147,907
Credit Cards
21,222 20,003
Overdrafts
21,777 21,751
Letters of credit
23,359 20,891
Other
43,572 33,369
Future loan commitments
213,687 101,399

Total off balance sheet commitments to extend credit
$ 1,099,743 $ 834,604
(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Commercial and industrial
$ 501,632 $ 416,195
Construction and development
229,676 240,503
Home equity
167,409 155,920
Credit cards
30,789 26,439
Overdrafts
34,149 32,715
Letters of credit
22,352 24,193
Other
44,782 40,083
Future loan commitments
207,847 236,885

Total off balance sheet commitments to extend credit
$ 1,238,636 $ 1,172,933

Commitments to extend credit are an agreement to lend to a customer either unsecured or secured, as long as collateral is available as agreed upon and there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not ~~necessarily~~ represent future cash requirements. Bancorp uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional guarantees as for on-balance sheet instruments. Bancorp evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a ~~case by case~~case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, securities, equipment and real estate. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, our maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
At June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, Bancorp had accrued ~~$350 thousand~~$6 million and $350,000, respectively, in other liabilities for its estimate of inherent risks related to unfunded credit commitments.
38

~~Table~~ In accordance with the adoption of ~~Contents~~
ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, Bancorp’s ACL on off-balance sheet exposures was increased from $350,000 at December 31, 2019 to $3.9 million ($2.6 million net of the DTA) with the offset recorded to retained earnings on a tax-effected basis, with no impact on earnings.

Standby letters of credit ~~and financial guarantees written~~ are conditional commitments issued by Bancorp to guarantee the performance of a customer to a first ~~party.~~party beneficiary. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support ~~customer~~ commercial transactions. Standby letters of credit generally have maturities of 1one to 2two years.
Certain commercial customers require confirmation of Bancorp’s letters of credit by other banks since Bancorp does not have a rating by a national rating agency. Terms of the agreements range from one month to a year with certain agreements requiring between one and six months’ notice to cancel. If an event of default on all contracts had occurred at June 30, 2020, Bancorp would have been required to make payments of approximately $2.2 million, or the maximum amount payable under those contracts. No payments have ever been required because of default on these contracts. These agreements are normally secured by collateral acceptable to Bancorp, which limits credit risk associated with the agreements.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, in the normal course of business, there were pending legal actions and proceedings in which claims for damages are asserted. Management, after discussion with legal counsel, believes the ultimate result of these legal actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of Bancorp.

43
Table of Contents

(1611)
Assets and Liabilities Measured and Reported at Fair Value

Fair value represents the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

●
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
~~Level~~ 1: ~~Valuation is based upon quoted (unadjusted) prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.~~
●
~~Level~~ 2: ~~Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are~~ ~~not~~ ~~active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.~~
●
~~Level~~ 3: ~~Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions~~ ~~not~~ observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions would reflect internal estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques could include pricing models, discounted cash flows and other similar techniques.

~~Authoritative guidance requires maximization of use of~~Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs ~~and minimization of use of~~other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in ~~fair value measurements. Where there exists limited or~~ no observable market data, Bancorp derives its own estimates by generally considering characteristics of the asset/liability, the current economic and competitive environment and other factors. For this reason, results cannot be determined with precision and ~~may~~ ~~not~~ ~~be realized on~~pricing an ~~actual sale or immediate settlement of the~~ asset or liability.

At ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018,~~ ~~Bancorp’s securities available for sale portfolio and interest rate swaps were recorded at~~The methods of determining the fair value ~~on a recurring basis.~~
All available for sale securities are priced using standard industry models or matrices with various assumptions such as yield curves, volatility, prepayment speeds, default rates, time value, credit rating and market prices for similar instruments. These assumptions are observable in the market place and can be derived from or supported by observable data. These measurements are classified as Level 2.
~~Fair value measurements for interest rate swaps are based on benchmark forward yield curves and other relevant observable market data. For purposes~~ of ~~potential valuation adjustments to derivative positions, Bancorp evaluates the credit risk of its counterparties as well as its own credit risk. To date, Bancorp has~~ ~~not~~ ~~realized any losses due to counterparty’s inability to perform and the change in value of derivative~~ assets and liabilities ~~attributable to credit risk was~~presented in this note are consistent with the methodologies disclosed in Bancorp’s ~~not~~2019 ~~significant during the reporting period. Interest rate swaps are valued using primarily Level~~Annual Report on Form 210 ~~inputs.~~-K.

Mortgage servicing rights, impaired loans and OREO are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis, generally in the application of lower of cost or market adjustments or write-downs of specific assets.
39

~~Table of Contents~~
~~Carrying values of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis follows:~~
(In thousands)

Fair value at June 30, 2019

Assets

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Securities available for sale:

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ 268,015 $ — $ 268,015 $ —
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
131,598 — 131,598 —
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
23,966 — 23,966 —

Total Securities available for sale
423,579 — 423,579 —

Interest rate swaps
1,813 — 1,813 —

Total assets
$ 425,392 $ — $ 425,392 $ —

Liabilities

Interest rate swaps
$ 1,849 $ — $ 1,849 $ —
(In thousands)

Fair value at December 31, 2018

Assets

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Securities available for sale:

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ 261,039 $ — $ 261,039 $ —
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
146,277 — 146,277 —
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
29,679 — 29,679 —

Total Securities available for sale
436,995 — 436,995 —

Interest rate swaps
1,035 — 1,035 —

Total assets
$ 438,030 $ — $ 438,030 $ —

Liabilities

Interest rate swaps
$ 543 $ — $ 543 $ —
For the securities portfolio, Bancorp monitors the valuation technique used by pricing agencies to ascertain when transfers between levels have occurred. The nature of other assets and liabilities measured at fair value is such that transfers in and out of any level are expected to be rare. For the ~~three~~ ~~and~~ ~~six~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2019,~~ ~~there were~~ no ~~transfers between Levels~~ 1,2, or 3.
~~Bancorp had nofinancial instruments classified within Level~~ 3 ~~of the valuation hierarchy for assets~~Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at ~~June 30, 2019~~ or ~~December 31, 2018.~~are summarized as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Total

June 30, 2020 (in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

Assets:

Available for sale debt securities:

Government sponsored enterprise obligations
$ — $ 204,411 $ — $ 204,411
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
— 270,254 — 270,254
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
— 10,584 — 10,584

Total available for sale debt securities
— 485,249 — 485,249

Interest rate swaps
— 9,895 — 9,895

Total assets
$ — $ 495,144 $ — $ 495,144

Liabilities:

Interest rate swaps
$ — $ 10,283 $ — $ 10,283

Fair Value Measurements Using

Total

December 31, 2019 (in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

Assets:

Available for sale debt securities:

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government obligations
$ 49,897 $ — $ — $ 49,897
Government sponsored enterprise obligations
— 209,944 — 209,944
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies
— 193,861 — 193,861
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
— 17,036 — 17,036

Total available for sale debt securities
49,897 420,841 — 470,738

Interest rate swaps
— 2,696 — 2,696

Total assets
$ 49,897 $ 423,537 $ — $ 473,434

Liabilities:

Interest rate swaps
$ — $ 2,767 $ — $ 2,767
There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during 2020 or 2019.
40
44
Table of Contents

~~Discussion of assets~~Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized as follows:

Losses recorded

Three months

Six months

Fair Value Measurements Using

Total

ended

ended

June 30, 2020 (in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2020

Collateral dependent loans
$ — $ — $ 8,434 $ 8,434 $ — $ —
Other real estate owned
— — 493 493 — —
~~Mortgage Servicing Rights~~ – On at least a quarterly basis, MSRs are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the MSRs as compared to carrying amount. Fair value is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income. These measurements are classified as Level 3. At ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018,~~ ~~there was novaluation allowance for the mortgage servicing rights, as the fair value exceeded the cost. Accordingly, the MSRs are~~ ~~not~~ ~~included in the following tabular disclosure for~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ or ~~December 31, 2018.~~

Losses recorded

Three months

Six months

Fair Value Measurements Using

Total

ended

ended

December 31, 2019 (in thousands)

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

Impaired loans
$ — $ — $ 7,253 $ 7,253 $ — $ —
Other real estate owned
— — 493 493 — —

~~Impaired loans~~ - Collateral-dependent impaired loans generally reflect partial charge-downs to their respective fair value, which is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals or other sources of valuations based upon the underlying collateral. Also, fair value is calculated as the carrying value of loans with a specific valuation allowance, less the specific valuation allowance. Fair value of impaired loans was primarily measured based on the value of collateral securing these loans. Impaired loans are classified within Level 3 ~~of the fair value hierarchy. Collateral~~ ~~may~~ be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory, and/or accounts receivable. Bancorp determines the value of real estate collateral based on independent appraisals performed by qualified licensed appraisers. These appraisals ~~may~~ ~~utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Appraised values are discounted for costs to sell and~~ ~~may~~ be discounted further based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the date of the most recent appraisal, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the customer and the customer’s business. Such discounts by management are subjective and are typically significant unobservable inputs for determining fair value. For other assets, Bancorp relies on both internal and ~~third~~ ~~party assessments of asset value, based on information provided by the borrower, following methodologies similar to those described for real estate. As of~~ ~~June 30, 2019,~~ ~~total impaired collateral dependent loans charged down to their fair value and impaired loans with a valuation allowance~~There were $389 thousand, and the specific allowance totaled $37 thousand, resulting in a fair value of $352 thousand, compared with total collateral dependent loans charged down to their fair value and impaired loans with a valuation allowance of $967 thousand, and the specific allowance allocation totaling $42 thousand, resulting in a fair value of $925 thousand at ~~December 31, 2018.~~ ~~Losses represent charge offs and changes in specific allowances for the periods indicated.~~
~~Other real estate owned (“OREO”)~~ - Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals performed by external parties which use judgments and assumptions that are property-specific and sensitive to changes in the overall economic environment. Appraisals ~~may~~ ~~be further discounted based on management’s historical knowledge and/or changes in market conditions from the date of the most recent appraisal. Many of these inputs are~~ ~~not~~ ~~observable and, accordingly, these measurements are classified as Level~~ 3. For OREO in the following table, fair value is the carrying value of only parcels of OREO which have a carrying value equal to appraised value. Losses represent write-downs which occurred during the period indicated. At ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018,~~ ~~carrying value of all other real estate owned was $563 thousand and $1.0 million, respectively.~~
41

~~Table of Contents~~
~~Below are the carrying values of assets~~0 liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring ~~basis.~~
(In thousands)

Fair value at June 30, 2019

Losses recorded:

Three months

Six months

ended

ended

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

Impaired loans
$ 352 $ — $ — $ 352 $ — $ —
Other real estate owned
239 — — 239 — —
(In thousands)

Fair value at December 31, 2018

Losses recorded:

Three months

Six months

ended

ended

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

June 30, 2018

June 30, 2018

Impaired loans
$ 925 $ — $ — $ 925 $ 304 $ 1,419
Other real estate owned
239 — — 239 — —
basis at June 30, 2020 and December 31,2019.

For Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, ~~as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018,~~ the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements are presented below.

June 30, 2019

Fair

Valuation

Unobservable

(weighted

(Dollars in thousands)

value

technique

inputs

average)

Impaired loans - collateral dependent
$ 352
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
10.0
%
Other real estate owned
239
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
22.0

June 30, 2020

(dollars in thousands)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs

Weighted Average

Collateral dependent loans
$ 8,434
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
7.2
%
Other real estate owned
493
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
17.1

December 31, 2019

(dollars in thousands)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs

Weighted Average

Impaired loans - collateral dependent
$ 7,253
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
60.3
%
Other real estate owned
493
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
17.1

December 31, 2018

Fair

Valuation

Unobservable

(weighted

(Dollars in thousands)

value

technique

inputs

average)

Impaired loans - collateral dependent
$ 925
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
9.9
%
Other real estate owned
1,018
Appraisal

Appraisal discounts
12.2
Collateral Dependent Loans with an ACL (Impaired Loans with Specific Reserves prior to the adoption of ASC 326): For collateral-dependent loans where Bancorp has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company expects repayment of the loan to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost basis of the loan as of the measurement date. For real estate loans, fair value of the loan’s collateral is determined by third party appraisals, which are then adjusted for the estimated selling and closing costs related to liquidation of the collateral. For this asset class, the actual valuation methods (income, comparable sales, or cost) vary based on the status of the project or property. For example, land is generally based on the comparable sales method while construction and improved real estate is based on the income and/or comparable sales methods. The unobservable inputs may vary depending on the individual assets with noone of the three methods being the predominant approach. Bancorp reviews the third party appraisal for appropriateness and adjusts the value downward to consider selling and closing costs, which typically range from 8% to 10% of the appraised value. For non-real estate loans, fair value of the loan’s collateral may be determined using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business.

42
45
Table of Contents
(17)
~~Disclosure of Financial Instruments~~ ~~Not~~ ~~Reported at Fair Value~~

~~GAAP requires disclosure~~Other Real Estate Owned: OREO is primarily comprised of real estate acquired in partial or full satisfaction of loans. OREO is recorded at its estimated fair value less estimated selling and closing costs at the date of transfer, with any excess of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs charged to the ACL. Subsequent changes in fair value are reported as adjustments to the carrying amount and are recorded against earnings. Bancorp outsources the valuation of OREO with material balances to third party appraisers. For this asset class, the actual valuation methods (income, sales comparable, or cost) vary based on the status of the project or property. For example, land is generally based on the sales comparable method while construction and improved real estate is based on the income and/or sales comparable methods. The unobservable inputs may vary depending on the individual assets with noone of the three methods being the predominant approach. Bancorp reviews the third party appraisal for appropriateness and adjusts the value downward to consider selling and closing costs, which typically range from 8% to 10% of the appraised value.
The estimated fair values of Bancorp’s financial ~~assets and liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are~~instruments not measured ~~and reported~~ at fair value on a recurring ~~basis~~ or ~~nonrecurring basis. Carrying amounts, estimated fair values, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of Bancorp’s financial instruments are as~~non-recurring basis follows:

(In thousands)

Carrying

June 30, 2019

amount

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
$ 116,039 $ 116,039 $ 116,039 $ — $ —
Mortgage loans held for sale
3,922 4,023 — 4,023 —
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
11,316 11,316 — 11,316 —
Loans, net
2,737,464 2,749,157 — — 2,749,157
Accrued interest receivable
9,633 9,633 9,633 — —

Liabilities

Non-interest bearing deposits
777,652 777,652 777,652 — —
Transaction deposits
1,671,016 1,671,016 — 1,671,016 —
Time deposits
434,785 436,451 — 436,451 —
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
33,809 33,809 — 33,809 —
Federal funds purchased
12,012 12,012 — 12,012 —
FHLB advances
84,279 84,505 — 84,505 —
Accrued interest payable
1,008 1,008 1,008 — —
(in thousands)

Carrying

Fair Value Measurements Using

June 30, 2020

amount

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
$ 224,394 $ 224,394 $ 224,394 $ — $ —
Mortgage loans held for sale
17,364 18,008 — 18,008 —
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
11,284 11,284 — 11,284 —
Loans, net
3,416,369 3,454,659 — — 3,454,659
Accrued interest receivable
13,535 13,535 13,535 — —

Liabilities
��
Non-interest bearing deposits
$ 1,205,253 $ 1,205,253 $ — $ 1,205,253 $ —
Transaction deposits
2,105,268 2,105,268 — 2,105,268 —
Time deposits
416,635 422,131 — 422,131 —
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
42,722 42,722 — 42,722 —
Federal funds purchased
8,401 8,401 — 8,401 —
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
61,432 63,436 — 63,436 —
Accrued interest payable
471 471 471 — —

(In thousands)

Carrying

December 31, 2018

amount

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
$ 198,939 $ 198,939 $ 198,939 $ — $ —
Mortgage loans held for sale
1,675 1,743 — 1,743 —
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
10,370 10,370 — 10,370 —
Loans, net
2,522,637 2,508,587 — — 2,508,587
Accrued interest receivable
8,360 8,360 8,360 — —

Liabilities

Non-interest bearing deposits
711,023 711,023 711,023 — —
Transaction deposits
1,736,618 1,736,618 — 1,736,618 —
Time deposits
346,715 345,273 — 345,273 —
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
36,094 36,094 — 36,094 —
Federal funds purchased
10,247 10,247 — 10,247 —
FHLB advances
48,177 47,227 — 47,227 —
Accrued interest payable
762 762 762 — —
~~Limitations~~
(in thousands)

Carrying

Fair Value Measurements Using

December 31, 2019

amount

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
$ 249,724 $ 249,724 $ 249,724 $ — $ —
Mortgage loans held for sale
8,748 8,923 — 8,923 —
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
11,284 11,284 — 11,284 —
Loans, net
2,818,225 2,841,767 — — 2,841,767
Accrued interest receivable
8,534 8,534 8,534 — —

Liabilities

Non-interest bearing deposits
$ 810,475 $ 810,475 $ — $ 810,475 $ —
Transaction deposits
1,891,246 1,891,246 — 1,891,246 —
Time deposits
432,217 434,927 — 434,927 —
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
31,895 31,895 — 31,895 —
Federal funds purchased
10,887 10,887 — 10,887 —
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
79,953 80,906 — 80,906 —
Accrued interest payable
640 640 640 — —

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about financial instruments. Because no market exists for a significant portion of Bancorp’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Therefore, calculated fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the instrument. Changes in assumptions could significantly ~~affect~~impact estimates.

43
46
Table of Contents

(1812)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table illustrates activity within the balances of AOCI by component:
(in thousands)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale debt securities

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

Minimum pension liability adjustment

Total

Three months ended June 30, 2020

Balance, March 31, 2020
$ 7,123 $ (302 ) $ (369 ) $ 6,452
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
2,343 21 — 2,364
Balance, June 30, 2020
$ 9,466 $ (281 ) $ (369 ) $ 8,816

Three months ended June 30, 2019

Balance, March 31, 2019
$ (2,536 ) $ 234 $ (211 ) $ (2,513 )
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
3,827 (248 ) — 3,579
Balance, June 30, 2019
$ 1,291 $ (14 ) $ (211 ) $ 1,066
(in thousands)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale debt securities

Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

Minimum pension liability adjustment

Total

Six months ended June 30, 2020

Balance, January 1, 2020
$ 1,085 $ (39 ) $ (369 ) $ 677
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
8,381 (242 ) — 8,139
Balance, June 30, 2020
$ 9,466 $ (281 ) $ (369 ) $ 8,816

Six months ended June 30, 2019

Balance, January 1, 2019
$ (5,330 ) $ 408 $ (220 ) $ (5,142 )
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
6,621 (422 ) 9 6,208
Balance, June 30, 2019
$ 1,291 $ (14 ) $ (211 ) $ 1,066
47
Table of Contents
(13)
Preferred Stock
Bancorp has one class of preferred stock (0 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized), the relative rights, preferences and other terms of the class or any series within the class will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to any issuance. None of this stock has been issued to date.
(14)
Net Income Per Share
The following table reflects net income (numerator) and average shares outstanding (denominator) for basic and diluted net income per share computations:

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(in thousands, except per share data)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Net income
$ 13,368 $ 16,543 $ 26,600 $ 32,184

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
22,560 22,689 22,538 22,675
Dilutive securities
179 260 199 273
Weighted average shares outstanding- diluted
22,739 22,949 22,737 22,948

Net income per share - basic
$ 0.59 $ 0.73 $ 1.18 $ 1.42
Net income per share - diluted
0.59 0.72 1.17 1.40
Certain SARs that were excluded from the EPS calculation because their impact was antidilutive were as follows:

Three months ended

Six months ended

(in thousands)

June 30,

June 30,

2020

2019

2020

2019

Antidilutive SARs
248 200 248 200
48
Table of Contents
(15)
Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of all stock-based awards granted, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as compensation expense over the respective service period.
At Bancorp's 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholders approved the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan and authorized the shares available from the expiring 2005 plan for future awards under the 2015 plan. In 2018, shareholders approved an additional 500,000 shares for issuance under the plan. As of June 30, 2020, there were 397,000 shares available for future awards. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan expired in April 2015 and SARs granted under this plan expire as late as 2025. The 2015 Stock Incentive Plan has no defined expiration date.
SAR Grants – SARs granted have a vesting schedule of 20% per year and expire ten years after the grant date unless forfeited due to employment termination.
Fair values of SARs are estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, a leading formula for calculating such value. This model requires the input of assumptions, changes to which can materially impact the fair value estimate. The following assumptions were used in SAR valuations at the grant date in each year:
Assumptions

2020

2019

Dividend yield
2.51 % 2.52 %
Expected volatility
20.87 % 20.40 %
Risk free interest rate
1.25 % 2.55 %
Expected life (in years)
7.1 7.2
Dividend yield and expected volatility are based on historical information for Bancorp corresponding to the expected life of SARs granted. Expected volatility is the volatility of underlying shares for the expected term calculated on a monthly basis. The risk free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the awards. The expected life of SARs is based on actual experience of past like-term SARs. Bancorp evaluates historical exercise and post-vesting termination behavior when determining the expected life.
RSA Grants – RSAs granted to officers vest over five years. For all grants prior to 2015, grantees are entitled to dividend payments during the vesting period. For grants in 2015 and forward, forfeitable dividends are deferred until shares are vested. Fair value of RSAs is equal to the market value of the shares on the date of grant.
PSU Grants – PSUs vest based upon service and a three-year performance period, which begins January 1 of the first year of the performance period. Because grantees are not entitled to dividend payments during the performance period, the fair value of these PSUs is estimated based upon the market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant, adjusted for non-payment of dividends. Grants require a one-year post-vesting holding period and the fair value of such grants incorporates a liquidity discount related to the holding period of 4.4% and 4.1% for 2020 and 2019.
RSU Grants – RSUs are only granted to non-employee directors, are time-based and vest 12 months after grant date. Because grantees are entitled to deferred dividend payments at the end of the vesting period, fair value of the RSUs equals market value of underlying shares on the date of grant.
In the first quarters of 2020 and 2019, Bancorp awarded 6,570 and 9,834 RSUs to non-employee directors of Bancorp with a grant date fair value of $270,000 and $247,000, respectively.
Bancorp utilized cash of $224,000 and $272,000 during the firstsix months of 2020 and 2019, respectively, for the purchase of shares upon the vesting of RSUs.
49
Table of Contents
Bancorp has recognized stock-based compensation expense for SARs, RSAs and PSUs within compensation expense and RSUs for directors within other non-interest expense, as follows:

Three months ended June 30, 2020

(in thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricte
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 87 $ 317 $ 67 $ 505 $ 976
Deferred tax benefit
(18 ) (67 ) (14 ) (106 ) (205 )
Total net expense
$ 69 $ 250 $ 53 $ 399 $ 771

Three months ended June 30, 2019

(in thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricte
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 86 $ 306 $ 83 $ 518 $ 993
Deferred tax benefit
(18 ) (65 ) (17 ) (109 ) (209 )
Total net expense
$ 68 $ 241 $ 66 $ 409 $ 784

Six months ended June 30, 2020

(in thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 177 $ 643 $ 135 $ 838 $ 1,793
Deferred tax benefit
(37 ) (135 ) (28 ) (177 ) (377 )
Total net expense
$ 140 $ 508 $ 107 $ 661 $ 1,416

Six months ended June 30, 2019

(in thousands)

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Expense
$ 170 $ 599 $ 164 $ 923 $ 1,856
Deferred tax benefit
(36 ) (126 ) (34 ) (194 ) (390 )
Total net expense
$ 134 $ 473 $ 130 $ 729 $ 1,466
Detail of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense follows:
(in thousands)

Year ended

Stock
Appreciation
Rights

Restricted
Stock Awards

Restricted
Stock Units

Performance
Stock Units

Total

Remainder of 2020
$ 176 $ 636 $ 135 $ 1,182 $ 2,129
2021
304 1,090 1 952 2,347
2022
249 823 — 490 1,562
2023
174 580 — — 754
2024
68 305 — — 373
2025
9 29 — — 38
Total estimated expense
$ 980 $ 3,463 $ 136 $ 2,624 $ 7,203
50
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes SARs activity and related information:

Weighted

Weighted

Weighted

average

average

Aggregate

average

remaining

Exercise

exercise

intrinsic

fair

contractual

(in thousands, except per share data)

SARs

price

price

value(1)

value

life (in years)

Outstanding, January 1, 2019
731 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 22.42 $ 8,422 $ 3.83 5.2
Granted
53 36.65 - 38.18 37.01 213 6.24
Exercised
(143 ) 14.02 - 22.96 15.99 3,025 3.47
Forfeited
— — — — —
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
641 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 25.06 $ 10,250 $ 4.10 5.3

Outstanding, January 1, 2020
641 $14.02 - $40.00 $ 25.06 $ 10,250 $ 4.10 5.3
Granted
48 37.30 - 37.30 37.30 140 5.80
Exercised
(12 ) 14.02 - 15.84 15.19 279 3.09
Forfeited
— — — — —
Outstanding, June 30, 2020
677 $15.24 - $40.00 $ 26.10 $ 9,550 $ 4.24 5.2

Vested and exercisable
485 $15.24 - $40.00 $ 21.87 $ 8,887 $ 3.62 3.9
Unvested
192 24.56 - 40.00 36.76 663 5.81 8.3
Outstanding, June 30, 2020
677 $15.24 - $40.00 $ 26.10 $ 9,550 $ 4.24 5.2

Vested at June 30, 2020
57 $22.96 - $40.00 $ 30.80 $ 537 $ 5.02
(1) - Intrinsic value for SARs is defined as the amount by which the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise or grantprice.
The following table summarizes activity for RSAs granted to officers:

Grant date

weighted

(in thousands, except per share data)

RSAs

average cost

Unvested at January 1, 2019
110 $ 32.09
Shares awarded
40 34.88
Restrictions lapsed and shares released
(40 ) 28.74
Shares forfeited
(2 ) 35.36
Unvested at December 31, 2019
108 $ 34.31

Unvested at January 1, 2020
108 $ 34.31
Shares awarded
36 39.30
Restrictions lapsed and shares released
(38 ) 32.13
Shares forfeited
(1 ) 36.70
Unvested at June 30, 2020
105 $ 36.81
Shares expected to be awarded for PSUs granted to executive officers of Bancorp, the three-year performance period for which began January 1 of the award year, are as follows:

Vesting

Expected

Grant

period

Fair

shares to

year

in years

value

be awarded

2018
3 $ 31.54 71,932
2019
3 32.03 43,603
2020
3 32.27 45,577
51
Table of Contents
(16)
Derivative Financial Instruments

Periodically, Bancorp enters into interest rate swap transactions with borrowers who desire to hedge exposure to rising interest rates, while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap, with substantially matching terms, with another approved independent counterparty. These are undesignated derivative instruments and are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Because of matching terms of offsetting contracts and collateral provisions mitigating any non-performance risk, changes in fair value subsequent to initial recognition have an insignificant effect on earnings. Exchanges of cash flows related to undesignated interest rate swap agreements ~~for the~~ ~~first~~~~six~~ ~~months of~~ ~~2019~~were offsetting and therefore had no effect on Bancorp’s earnings or cash flows.

Interest rate swap agreements derive their value from underlying interest rates. These transactions involve both credit and market risk. Notional amounts are amounts on which calculations, payments and the value of the derivative are based. Notional amounts do not represent direct credit exposures. Direct credit exposure is limited to the net difference between the calculated amounts to be received and paid, if any. Bancorp is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of ~~nonperformance~~non-performance by counterparties to these agreements. Bancorp mitigates the credit risk of its financial contracts through credit approvals, limits, collateral and monitoring procedures, and does not expect any counterparties to fail their obligations.

44

~~Table of Contents~~
At ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018,~~ Bancorp had outstanding undesignated interest rate swap contracts as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Receiving

Paying

June 30,

December 31,

June 30,

December 31,

Receiving

Paying

June 30,

December 31,

June 30,

December 31,

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

2019

2018

2019

2018

Notional amount
$ 60,607 $ 55,505 $ 60,607 $ 55,505 $ 103,526 $ 99,000 $ 103,526 $ 99,000
Weighted average maturity (years)
7.4 8.0 7.4 8.0 7.9 8.2 7.9 8.2
Fair value
$ 1,813 $ 519 $ 1,835 $ 543 $ 9,895 $ 2,696 $ 9,914 $ 2,767

In 2015, Bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to hedge cash flows of a $20 million rolling fixed-rate three-month FHLB borrowing. The swap began December 9, 2015 and matures December 6, 2020. In 2016, Bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to hedge cash flows of a $10 million rolling fixed-rate three-month FHLB borrowing. The swap began December 6, 2016 and ~~ends~~matures December 6, 2021. For purposes of hedging, rolling fixed rate advances are considered to be floating rate liabilities. Interest rate swaps involve exchange of Bancorp’s floating rate interest payments for fixed rate swap payments on underlying principal amounts. These swaps were designated and qualified, for cash-flow hedge accounting. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedging instruments, the effective portion of gains or losses is reported as a component of ~~other comprehensive income,~~OCI, and is subsequently reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense in periods infor which the hedged forecasted transaction ~~affects~~impacts earnings.

The following table details the notional and fair value amounts of Bancorp’s derivative ~~position~~positions designated as a cash flow ~~hedge, and the fair values as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2018.~~hedges:

(Dollars in thousands)

(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)

Fair value

Fair value

Notional
Notional

Maturity

Receive (variable)

Pay fixed

assets (liabilities)

Notional

Maturity

Receive (variable)

Pay fixed

assets (liabilities)

amount
amount

date

index

swap rate

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

amount

date

index

swap rate

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

$ 10,000
12/6/2021
US 3 Month LIBOR
1.89 % $ (37 ) $ 193 10,000
12/6/2021

US 3 Month LIBOR
1.89 % $ (239 ) $ (45 )
20,000
12/6/2020
US 3 Month LIBOR
1.79 % 23 323 20,000
12/6/2020

US 3 Month LIBOR
1.79 % (130 ) (6 )
$ 30,000 1.82 % $ (14 ) $ 516 30,000 1.82 % $ (369 ) $ (51 )

52
Table of Contents

(1917)
Regulatory Matters

Bancorp and the Bank are subject to capital regulations in accordance with Basel III, as administered by banking regulators. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Bancorp’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, ~~the Holding Company~~Bancorp and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of Bancorp’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators regarding components, risk weightings and other factors.

Banking regulators have categorized the Bank as well-capitalized. ~~For prompt corrective action, the~~The regulations in accordance with Basel III define “well capitalized” as a 6.5% Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio, an 8.0% Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio, a 10.0% Total Risk-Based Capital ratio and a 5.0% Tier 1 Leverage ratio. Additionally, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, Bancorp and Bank must hold a capital conservation buffer composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital above their minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer ~~phased in from~~set forth by the Basel III regulatory capital framework was 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the minimum risk based capital ratio requirements at ~~2016~~June 30, 2020 toand ~~2019~~December 31, 2019. ~~on the following schedule: a~~The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of ~~0.625% effective~~economic stress and requires increased capital levels for the purpose of capital distributions and other payments. Failure to meet the full amount of the buffer will result in restrictions on Bancorp’s ability to make capital distributions, including dividend payments and stock repurchases, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. At ~~January 1, 2016;~~ ~~1.25% effective~~ ~~January 1, 2017;~~ ~~1.875% effective~~ ~~January 1, 2018;~~June 30, 2020 and ~~a fully phased in~~December 31, 2019, Bancorp’s and the Bank’s risk-based capital exceeded the required capital conservation ~~buffer of 2.5% on~~ ~~January 1, 2019.~~buffer.
45

~~Table of Contents~~

Bancorp continues to exceed the regulatory requirements to be considered “well-capitalized” for Total Risk Based Capital, Common Equity Tier I Risk Based Capital, Tier I Risk Based Capital and Tier I ~~Leverage Capital.~~Leverage. Bancorp and the Bank intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the ~~“well-capitalized”~~well-capitalized requirements as defined by the FRB and the FDIC, in addition to the Capital Conservation Buffer. There are no conditions or events since June 30, 2020 that management believes have changed Bancorp’s well-capitalized status.
As permitted by the interim final rule issued on March 27, 2020 by the federal banking regulatory agencies, Bancorp elected the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital related to the adoption of ASC 326 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,” or CECL, which was effective January 1, 2020. The initial impact of adoption of ASC 326, as well as 25% of the quarterly increases in the ACL subsequent to adoption of ASC 326 (collectively the “transition adjustments”) were declared to be delayed for two years. After two years, the cumulative amount of the transition adjustments will become fixed and will be phased out of the regulatory capital calculations evenly over a three-year period, with 75% recognized in year three, 50% recognized in year four and 25% recognized in year five. After five years, the temporary regulatory capital benefits will be fully reversed. Had Bancorp elected not to defer the regulatory capital impact of CECL, the post ASC 326 adoption capital ratios of Bancorp and the Bank would have exceeded the well-capitalized level.
Dividends paid by Bancorp are limited to, without prior regulatory approval, current year earnings and earnings less dividends paid during the preceding two years.
53
Table of Contents

The following table sets forth consolidated Bancorp’s and the Bank’s risk based capital amounts and ratios:

(Dollars in thousands)

Actual

Minimum for adequately
capitalized

Minimum for well
capitalized

June 30, 2019

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

(dollars in thousands)

Actual

Minimum for adequately
capitalized

Minimum for well
capitalized

June 30, 2020

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Total risk-based capital (1)

Consolidated
$ 400,314 12.67
%
$ 252,821 8.00
%

NA

NA
$ 446,117 13.50
%
$ 264,297 8.00
%

NA

NA

Bank
392,705 12.45 252,265 8.00 $ 315,331 10.00 % 430,654 13.07 263,610 8.00 $ 329,512 10.00 %

Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital

Consolidated
373,548 11.82 142,212 4.50
NA

NA
409,251 12.39 148,667 4.50
NA

NA

Bank
365,939 11.60 141,899 4.50 204,965 6.50 393,788 11.95 148,280 4.50 214,183 6.50

Tier 1 risk-based capital (1)

Consolidated
373,548 11.82 189,616 6.00
NA

NA
409,251 12.39 198,223 6.00
NA

NA

Bank
365,939 11.60 189,198 6.00 252,265 8.00 393,788 11.95 197,707 6.00 263,610 8.00

Leverage (2)

Consolidated
373,548 10.91 136,955 4.00
NA

NA
409,251 9.50 172,277 4.00
NA

NA

Bank
365,939 10.70 136,784 4.00 170,980 5.00 393,788 9.15 172,124 4.00 215,155 5.00

(Dollars in thousands)

Actual

Minimum for adequately
capitalized

Minimum for well
capitalized

December 31, 2018

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

(dollars in thousands)

Actual

Minimum for adequately
capitalized
��
Minimum for well
capitalized

December 31, 2019

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Total risk-based capital (1)

Consolidated
$ 396,019 13.91
%
$ 227,714 8.00
%

NA

NA
$ 418,460 12.85
%
$ 260,448 8.00
%

NA

NA

Bank
385,637 13.56 227,462 8.00 $ 284,327 10.00 % 396,299 12.20 259,823 8.00 $ 324,778 10.00
%

Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital

Consolidated
370,135 13.00 128,089 4.50
NA

NA
391,319 12.02 146,502 4.50
NA

NA

Bank
359,753 12.65 127,947 4.50 184,813 6.50 369,158 11.37 146,150 4.50 211,106 6.50

Tier 1 risk-based capital (1)

Consolidated
370,135 13.00 170,785 6.00
NA

NA
391,319 12.02 195,336 6.00
NA

NA

Bank
359,753 12.65 170,596 6.00 227,462 8.00 369,158 11.37 194,867 6.00 259,823 8.00

Leverage (2)

Consolidated
370,135 11.33 130,698 4.00
NA

NA
391,319 10.60 147,733 4.00
NA

NA

Bank
359,753 11.02 130,569 4.00 163,211 5.00 369,158 10.67 138,392 4.00 172,990 5.00

(1)     Ratio is computed in relation to risk-weighted assets.
(2)     Ratio is computed in relation to average assets.
NA – Not Applicable
~~Ratio is computed in relation to risk-weighted assets.~~
(2)
~~Ratio is computed in relation to average assets.~~
NA
~~Not~~ ~~applicable. Regulatory framework does~~ ~~not~~ ~~define well capitalized for holding companies~~.

46
54

Table of Contents

(2018)
Segments

Bancorp’s principal activities include commercial banking and WM&T. Commercial banking provides a full range of loan and deposit products to individual consumers and businesses. Commercial banking also includes Bancorp’s mortgage ~~origination~~banking and investment products sales activity. WM&T provides custom-tailored financial ~~management services including~~planning, investment management, company retirement plan management, retirement planning, trust and estate ~~administration, and retirement plan services.~~services in all markets in which Bancorp operates. The magnitude of WM&T revenue distinguishes Bancorp from other community banks of similar asset size.

Financial information for each business segment reflects that which is specifically identifiable or allocated based on an internal allocation method. Income taxes are allocated based on the effective federal income tax rate adjusted for any ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt activity. All ~~tax exempt~~tax-exempt activity and provision ~~for loan losses~~ have been allocated fully to the commercial banking segment. Measurement of performance of business segments is based on the management structure of Bancorp and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution. Information presented is also not necessarily indicative of the segments’ operations if they were independent entities.

Principally, all of the net assets of Bancorp are involved in the commercial banking segment. Goodwill of ~~$12.8~~$12.5 million, of which ~~$682 thousand~~$682,000 relates to a bank acquisition in 1996 and ~~$12.1~~$11.8 million ~~resulted from~~relates to the ~~King~~ May 2019 acquisition, has been assigned to the commercial banking segment. Assets assigned to WM&T primarily consist of net premises and ~~equipment.~~equipment and a receivable related to fees earned that have not been collected.

Selected financial information by business segment ~~for the~~ ~~three~~ ~~and~~ ~~six~~ ~~month periods ended~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~2018~~follows:

Wealth

Three months ended June 30, 2020

Three months ended June 30, 2019

Commercial

Management

(In thousands)

Banking

and Trust

Total Company

(dollars in thousands)

Commercial
Banking

WM&T

Total

Commercial
Banking

WM&T

Total

Three months ended June 30, 2019

Net interest income
$ 30,690 $ 84 $ 30,774 $ 33,443 $ 85 $ 33,528 $ 30,718 $ 84 $ 30,802
Provision
— — —
Provision for credit losses
5,550 — 5,550 — — —
Wealth management and trust services
— 5,662 5,662 — 5,726 5,726 — 5,662 5,662
All other non-interest income
6,601 — 6,601 6,896 — 6,896 6,562 — 6,562
Non-interest expenses
22,297 3,167 25,464 21,763 3,121 24,884 22,286 3,167 25,453
Income before income tax expense
14,994 2,579 17,573 13,026 2,690 15,716 14,994 2,579 17,573
Income tax expense
471 559 1,030 1,764 584 2,348 471 559 1,030
Net income
$ 14,523 $ 2,020 $ 16,543 $ 11,262 $ 2,106 $ 13,368 $ 14,523 $ 2,020 $ 16,543

Segment assets
$ 3,462,105 $ 1,718 $ 3,463,823 4,330,893 $ 3,640 $ 4,334,533 3,460,040 $ 3,783 $ 3,463,823

Three months ended June 30, 2018

Net interest income
$ 28,612 $ 62 $ 28,674
Provision
1,235 — 1,235
Wealth management and trust services
— 5,344 5,344
All other non-interest income
6,091 — 6,091
Non-interest expenses
18,938 3,198 22,136
Income before income tax expense
14,530 2,208 16,738
Income tax expense
2,644 515 3,159
Net income
$ 11,886 $ 1,693 $ 13,579

Segment assets
$ 3,321,948 $ 1,892 $ 3,323,840

Six months ended June 30, 2020

Six months ended June 30, 2019

(dollars in thousands)

Commercial
Banking

WM&T

Total

Commercial
Banking

WM&T

Total

Net interest income
$ 65,804 $ 170 $ 65,974 $ 60,326 $ 160 $ 60,486
Provision for credit losses
11,100 — 11,100 600 — 600
Wealth management and trust services
— 11,944 11,944 — 11,101 11,101
All other non-interest income
13,214 — 13,214 12,131 — 12,131
Non-interest expenses
42,401 6,433 48,834 41,865 6,200 48,065
Income before income tax expense
25,517 5,681 31,198 29,992 5,061 35,053
Income tax expense
3,365 1,233 4,598 1,771 1,098 2,869
Net income
$ 22,152 $ 4,448 $ 26,600 $ 28,221 $ 3,963 $ 32,184

Segment assets
4,330,893 $ 3,640 $ 4,334,533 3,460,040 $ 3,783 $ 3,463,823

47
55

Table of Contents

Wealth

Commercial

management

(In thousands)

Banking

and Trust

Total Company

Six months ended June 30, 2019

Net interest income
$ 60,271 $ 160 $ 60,431
Provision
600 — 600
Wealth management and trust services
— 11,101 11,101
All other non-interest income
12,224 — 12,224
Non-interest expenses
41,903 6,200 48,103
Income before income tax expense
29,992 5,061 35,053
Income tax expense
1,771 1,098 2,869
Net income
$ 28,221 $ 3,963 $ 32,184

Segment assets
$ 3,462,105 $ 1,718 $ 3,463,823

Six months ended June 30, 2018

Net interest income
$ 55,850 $ 133 $ 55,983
Provision
1,970 — 1,970
Wealth management and trust services
— 10,844 10,844
All other non-interest income
11,500 — 11,500
Non-interest expenses
36,798 6,365 43,163
Income before income tax expense
28,582 4,612 33,194
Income tax expense
5,210 1,001 6,211
Net income
$ 23,372 $ 3,611 $ 26,983

Segment assets
$ 3,321,948 $ 1,892 $ 3,323,840
48

~~Table of Contents~~

(2119)
Revenue from Contracts with Customers

All of Bancorp’s revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within non-interest income. The table below presents Bancorp’s sources of non-interest income with items outside the scope of ASC 606 noted as such:

Three months ended June 30, 2019

Three months ended June 30, 2018

Three months ended June 30, 2020

Three months ended June 30, 2019

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial

WM&T

Total

Commercial

WM&T

Total

(dollars in thousands)

Commercial
Banking

WM&T

Total

Commercial

WM&T

Total

Wealth management and trust services
$ — $ 5,662 $ 5,662 $ — $ 5,344 $ 5,344 $ — $ 5,726 $ 5,726 $ — $ 5,662 $ 5,662
Deposit service charges
1,336 — 1,336 1,447 — 1,447 800 — 800 1,260 — 1,260
Debit and credit card income
2,168 — 2,168 1,689 — 1,689 2,063 — 2,063 2,168 — 2,168
Treasury management fees
1,202 — 1,202 1,113 — 1,113 1,249 — 1,249 1,202 — 1,202
Mortgage banking income(1)
796 — 796 746 — 746 1,622 — 1,622 760 — 760
Net investment product sales commissions and fees
364 — 364 397 — 397 391 — 391 364 — 364
Bank owned life insurance(1)
184 — 184 191 — 191 176 — 176 184 — 184
Other(2)
551 — 551 508 — 508 595 — 595 624 — 624
Total non-interest income
$ 6,601 $ 5,662 $ 12,263 $ 6,091 $ 5,344 $ 11,435 $ 6,896 $ 5,726 $ 12,622 $ 6,562 $ 5,662 $ 12,224

Six months ended June 30, 2020

Six months ended June 30, 2019

Six months ended June 30, 2019

Six months ended June 30, 2018

(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial

WM&T

Total

Commercial

WM&T

Total

Commercial
Banking

WM&T

Total

Commercial

WM&T

Total

Wealth management and trust services
$ — $ 11,101 $ 11,101 $ — $ 10,844 $ 10,844 $ — $ 11,944 $ 11,944 $ — $ 11,101 $ 11,101
Deposit service charges
2,583 — 2,583 2,858 — 2,858 2,083 — 2,083 2,438 — 2,438
Debit and credit card income
3,912 — 3,912 3,197 — 3,197 4,043 — 4,043 3,912 — 3,912
Treasury management fees
2,359 — 2,359 2,160 — 2,160 2,533 — 2,533 2,359 — 2,359
Mortgage banking income(1)
1,278 — 1,278 1,322 — 1,322 2,468 — 2,468 1,210 — 1,210
Net investment product sales commissions and fees
720 — 720 801 — 801 857 — 857 720 — 720
Bank owned life insurance(1)
362 — 362 378 — 378 355 — 355 362 — 362
Other(2)
1,010 — 1,010 784 — 784 875 — 875 1,130 — 1,130
Total non-interest income
$ 12,224 $ 11,101 $ 23,325 $ 11,500 $ 10,844 $ 22,344 $ 13,214 $ 11,944 $ 25,158 $ 12,131 $ 11,101 $ 23,232

(1) Outside of the scope of ASC 606.
(2) Outside of the scope of ASC 606, with the exception of safe deposit fees which were nominal for all periods.

Bancorp’s revenue on the consolidated statement of income is categorized by product type, which effectively depicts how the nature, timing and extent of cash flows are affected by economic factors. Revenue sources within the scope of ASC 606 are discussed below:

Bancorp earns fees from its deposit customers for ~~transactions-based,~~transaction-based, account management and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payments fees and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed, as that is when the company fulfills the performance obligation. Account management fees are earned over the course of a month and charged in the month in which the services are provided. ~~Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Deposit service charges are withdrawn from customer’s account balances.~~

Treasury management transaction fees are recognized at the time the transaction is executed, as that is when the company fulfills the performance obligation. Account management fees are earned over the course of a month and charged in the month in which the services are provided. Treasury management fees are withdrawn from ~~customer’s~~customers’ account balances.

WM&T provides customers fiduciary and investment management services as agreed upon in asset management contracts. The contracts require WM&T to provide a series of distinct services for which fees are earned over time. The contracts are cancellable upon demand with fees typically based upon the asset value of investments. Revenue is accrued and recognized monthly based upon month-end asset values and collected from the customer predominately in the following month except for a small percentage of fees collected quarterly. Incentive compensation related to WM&T activities is considered a cost of obtaining the contract. Contracts between WM&T and clients do not permit ~~performance based~~performance-based fees and accordingly, none of the ~~fees~~fee income earned by WM&T ~~are performance based.~~is performance-based. Trust fees receivable were $2.1 million as of both June 30, ~~2019~~2020 ~~were $2.1 million compared with $1.9 million as of~~and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.
49

~~Table of Contents~~

Investment products sales commissions and fees represent the Bank’s share of transaction fees and wrap fees resulting from investment services and programs provided through an agent relationship with a third party broker-dealer. Transaction fees are assessed at the time of the transaction. Those fees are collected and recognized on a monthly basis. Trailing fees are based upon market ~~value~~values and are assessed, collected and recognized on a quarterly basis. Because the Bank acts as an agent in arranging the relationship between the customer and third party provider, and does not control the services rendered, investment product sales commissions and fees are reported net of related costs, including nominal incentive compensation, and trading activity charges of ~~$257~~$283,000 and ~~$261 thousand,~~$258,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019. ~~respectively.~~

Debit and credit card revenue primarily consists of debit and credit card interchange income. Interchange income represents fees assessed within the payment card system for acceptance of ~~card based~~card-based transactions. Interchange fees are assessed as the performance obligation is satisfied, which is at the point in time the card transaction is authorized. Revenue is collected and recognized daily through the payment network settlement process.

Bancorp did not establish any contract assets or liabilities as a result of adopting ASC 606, nor were any recognized during the ~~first~~six ~~months of~~-month period ending ~~2019.~~June 30, 2020.

~~Bancorp’s revenue on the consolidated statement~~
56
Table of ~~income is categorized by product type, which effectively depicts how the nature, timing, and extent of cash flows are affected by economic factors.~~
Contents

(2220)
Leases

Bancorp has operating leases for various branch locations with terms ~~remaining~~ranging from ~~3 months~~one month to 1413 years, some of which include options to extend the leases in ~~5 year~~five-year increments. Options reasonably expected to be exercised are included in determination of the ~~right of use~~right-of-use asset. Bancorp elected the practical expedient to expense short-term lease ~~expense~~obligations associated with leases with original terms of 12 months or less. Bancorp elected not to separate non-lease components from lease components for its operating leases. The right-of-use lease asset and operating lease liability are recorded in ~~others assets~~premises and equipment and other liabilities ~~respectively,~~ on the consolidated balance sheet.
50

~~Table of Contents~~

Balance sheet, income statement and cash flow detail regarding operating leases follows:

(In thousands)

(in thousands)

Balance Sheet

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Operating lease right-of-use assets
$ 16,056
included in premises and equipment
$ 11,547 $ 12,737
Operating lease liabilities
17,373
included in other liabilities
12,992 14,369

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)
12.42

Weighted average remaining lease term
9.0 9.4
Weighted average discount rate
3.61 %    3.50 % 2.46 %

Maturities of lease liabilities:

One year or less
$ 1,949 $ 986 $ 1,964
Year 2
1,929 1,916 1,915
Year 3
1,919 1,930 1,930
Year 4
1,955 1,972 1,972
Year 5
1,935 1,781 1,781
Greater than 5 years
11,870 6,619 6,619
Total lease payments
$ 21,557 $ 15,204 $ 16,181
Less imputed interest
4,184 2,212 1,812
Total
$ 17,373
Total lease liabilities
$ 12,992 $ 14,369

(In thousands)

Three months ended

Six months ended

(in thousands)

Three months ended

Three months ended

Income Statement

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2019

Components of lease expense:

Operating lease cost
$ 489 $ 997 $ 473 $ 489
Variable lease cost
24 63 45 24
Less sublease income
13 27 25 13
Total lease cost
$ 500 $ 1,033 $ 493 $ 500

(in thousands)

Six months ended

Six months ended

Income Statement

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2019

Components of lease expense:

Operating lease cost
$ 943 $ 997
Variable lease cost
87 63
Less sublease income
38 27
Total lease cost
$ 992 $ 1,033

(In thousands)

Six months ended

(in thousands)

Six months ended

Six months ended

Cash flow Statement

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2020

June 30, 2019

Supplemental cash flow information:

Operating cash flows from operating leases
$ 694 $ 790 $ 694

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020, Bancorp had not entered into any lease agreements that had yet to commence.

51
57

Table of Contents

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

~~This item discusses~~The consolidated financial statements include the ~~results and operations for~~accounts of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. ~~(“Holding Company”),~~ and its ~~wholly-owned~~wholly owned subsidiary, ~~Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company (“Bank”) for~~SYB, collectively referred to as “Bancorp” or the ~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and compares these periods with the same periods of the previous year.~~“Company.” All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. ~~All companies are collectively referred to as “Bancorp” or the “Company.”~~

~~As a result of its acquisition of King,~~Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. ~~on May 1, 2019, Bancorp became~~is a FHC headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. Established in 1904, SYB is a state-chartered non-member financial institution that provides services in the 100% successor owner of King Bancorp Statutory Trust I (“KBST”), an unconsolidated finance subsidiary. As permitted under the terms of KBST’s governing documents, Bancorp redeemed the trust-preferred securities at the par amount of approximately $3.6 million on June 17, 2019.Louisville, Kentucky, Indianapolis, Indiana and Cincinnati, Ohio MSAs through 42 full service banking center locations.

This section presents management’s perspective on our financial condition and results of operations. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying ~~notes~~footnotes presented in Part 1 Item 1 ~~“Financial Statements.~~“Financial Statements” and other information appearing in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. To the extent that this discussion describes prior performance, the descriptions relate only to the periods listed, which may not be indicative of Bancorp’s future financial outcomes. In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations.

~~Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky.~~
The Bank, chartered in 1904, is a state-chartered non-member financial institution that provides services in the Louisville, Kentucky, Indianapolis, Indiana and Cincinnati, Ohio Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSAs”) through 43 full service banking center locations.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This ~~report~~document contains statements relating to future results of Bancorp that are considered “forward-looking” as defined by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The forward-looking statements ~~under~~are principally, but not exclusively, contained in Part I Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors.”
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the ~~Private Securities Litigation Reform Act~~statement. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “conclude,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foresee,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “outlook,” “possible,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “will likely,” “would,” or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control, particularly with regard to developments related to COVID-19. Forward-looking statements detail management’s expectations regarding the future and are based on information known to management only as of the date the statements are made and management undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law.
There is no assurance that ~~involve~~any list of risks and ~~uncertainties. Although Bancorp believes assumptions underlying forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of these assumptions could be inaccurate.~~uncertainties or risk factors is complete. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from ~~results discussed~~those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements include, ~~but are not limited to the following: economic conditions both generally and more specifically in markets in which Bancorp and the Bank operate; competition for Bancorp’s customers from~~among other providers of financial services; government legislation and regulation which change from time to time and over which Bancorp has no control; changes in interest rates; material unforeseen changes in liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Bancorp’s customers; and other risks detailed in Bancorp’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of Bancorp.things:

●
impact of COVID-19 on Bancorp’s business, including the impact of the actions taken by governmental authorities to try and contain the virus or address the impact of the virus on the U.S. economy (including, without limitation, the CARES Act), and the resulting effect of all of such items on our operations, liquidity and capital position, and on the financial condition of Bancorp’s borrowers and other customers;
●
changes in or forecasts of future political and economic conditions;
●
accuracy of assumptions and estimates used in establishing the ACL on loans and other estimates;
●
impairment of investment securities, goodwill, other intangible assets or DTAs;
●
ability to effectively navigate an economic slowdown or other economic or market disruption;
●
changes in laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof;
●
changes in fiscal, monetary, and/or regulatory policies;
●
changes in tax polices including but not limited to changes in federal and state statutory rates;
●
behavior of securities and capital markets, including changes in market volatility and liquidity;
●
ability to effectively manage capital and liquidity;
●
long-term and short-term interest rate fluctuations, as well as the shape of the U.S. Treasury yield curve;
●
the magnitude and frequency of changes to the FFTR implemented by the Federal Open Market Committee of the FRB;
●
competitive product and pricing pressures;
●
projections of revenue, expenses, capital expenditures, losses, EPS, dividends, capital structure, etc.;
~~Acquisition~~
58

Table of ~~King Bancorp, Inc.~~~~and its wholly-owned subsidiary King Southern Bank~~~~(“King”)~~Contents
●
descriptions of plans or objectives for future operations, products, or services;
●
changes in the credit quality of Bancorp’s customers and counterparties, deteriorating asset quality and charge-off levels;
●
changes in technology instituted by Bancorp, its counterparties or competitors;
●
changes to or the effectiveness of Bancorp’s overall internal control environment;
●
adequacy of Bancorp’s risk management framework, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;
●
changes in applicable accounting standards, including the introduction of new accounting standards;
●
changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or savings behavior;
●
ability to appropriately address social, environmental and sustainability concerns that may arise from business activities;
●
integration of acquired businesses or future acquisitions;
●
occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities, including health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics or outbreaks of hostilities, and Bancorp’s ability to deal effectively with disruptions caused by the foregoing;
●
ability to maintain the security of its financial, accounting, technology, data processing and other operational systems and facilities;
●
ability to withstand disruptions that may be caused by any failure of its operational systems or those of third parties;
●
ability to effectively defend itself against cyberattacks or other attempts by unauthorized parties to access information of Bancorp or its customers or to disrupt systems; and
●
other risks and uncertainties reported from time to time in Bancorp’s filings with the SEC, including Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors.”
Acquisition of King Bancorp, Inc.and its wholly owned subsidiary King Southern Bank

On May 1, 2019, Bancorp completed its acquisition of ~~King Bancorp Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary King Southern Bank (collectively referred to as “King”),~~KSB for $28 million in cash. The acquisition ~~expands the Company’s~~expanded Bancorp’s market area into nearby Nelson County, Kentucky, while expanding the customer base in Louisville, Kentucky. At May 1, 2019, ~~King~~the acquiree reported approximately $192 million in total assets, approximately $164 million in loans and approximately $126 million in deposits. As a result of the acquisition, goodwill totaling $11.8 million was recorded during the second quarter of 2019, with nominal recast adjustments posted during the third and fourth quarters of 2019.

As a result of the completion of the acquisition, Bancorp incurred pre-tax transaction charges totaling $1.3 million ~~for~~predominantly during the ~~three and six months ended June 30,~~second quarter of 2019. Net income from the ~~King~~ acquisition ~~is expected to be~~was accretive to Bancorp’s overall operating results ~~on a quarterly basis going forward.~~beginning with the third quarter of 2019. Effective March 31, 2020, management finalized the fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in advance of the 12-month post acquisition date, as allowed by GAAP.

~~Issued but Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”)~~In connection with the acquisition, Bancorp became the 100% successor owner of KBST, an unconsolidated finance subsidiary. As permitted under the terms of KBST’s governing documents, Bancorp redeemed the TPS at the par amount of approximately $4 million on June 17, 2019.
Issued but Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards Updates

For disclosure regarding the impact to Bancorp’s financial statements of issued-but-not-yet-effective ASUs, see ~~Footnote 1 “Basis~~the footnote titled “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting ~~Policies”~~Policies” of Part I Item 1 ~~“Financial Statements.~~“Financial Statements.”

52
59
Table of Contents
Business Segment Overview

~~Business Segment Overview~~
~~As of June 30, 2019,~~ Bancorp ~~was~~is divided into two reportable segments: Commercial Banking and ~~Wealth Management & Trust (“~~WM~~&T”):~~&T:

Commercial Banking provides a full range of loan and deposit products to individual consumers and businesses in all its markets through ~~commercial lending,~~ retail lending, mortgage banking, deposit services, ~~treasury management services, private banking,~~ online banking, mobile banking, private banking, commercial lending, treasury management services, merchant services, international banking, correspondent banking and other banking services. The Bank also offers securities brokerage services via its banking center network through an arrangement with a third party ~~broker-dealer.~~broker-dealer in the Commercial Banking segment.

WM&T ~~with over $3 billion in assets under management (“AUM”),~~ provides custom-tailored financial planning, investment management, company retirement plan management, retirement planning, ~~and~~ trust and estate services in all markets in which Bancorp operates. The magnitude of WM&T revenue distinguishes Bancorp from other community banks of similar asset size.

Overview – Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Financial Condition and Results of Operations
~~Summary - Three~~
The COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. and ~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared~~efforts to contain it have had a complex and significant adverse impact on the economy, the banking industry and Bancorp. The impact on future fiscal periods is subject to a high degree of uncertainty.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic, indicating that almost all public commerce and related business activities must be, to varying degrees, curtailed with the goal of decreasing the rate of new infections. The spread of the outbreak has caused significant disruptions in the U.S. economy and has disrupted banking and other financial activity in the markets in which Bancorp operates. While some industries have been impacted more severely than others, all businesses have been impacted to some degree. This disruption resulted in the initial shuttering of non-essential businesses across most of the country, significant job loss, and aggressive measures by the federal government. While there has been some phased-in re-opening of commerce that began in the second quarter, unemployment levels have remained elevated.
In response to the ~~Three~~above, Congress, the President and ~~Six Months Ended June 30, 2018~~regulatory agencies took action designed to lessen the economic fallout. Most notably, the CARES Act was signed into law at the end of March. The goal of the CARES Act was to prevent a severe economic downturn through various measures, including direct financial aid to American families and economic stimulus to significantly impacted industry sectors.

Three months ended June 30, (In thousands, except per share data)

2019

2018

$ Change

% Change

Net income
$ 16,543 $ 13,579 $ 2,964 21.8 %
Diluted earnings per share
$ 0.72 $ 0.59 $ 0.13 22.0 %
Annualized return on average assets
1.93 % 1.74 %
19 bps
10.9 %
Annualized return on average equity
17.40 % 15.94 %
146 bps
9.2 %
The CARES Act, established the SBA PPP to provide loans for eligible businesses/not-for-profits with the focus on job retention and certain operating expenses. Portions of these loans qualify for forgiveness for payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities during the 24-week period beginning with the date of the loan. Loans funded through the PPP are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government.

The CARES Act permits financial institutions to suspend requirements under GAAP for loan modifications to borrowers affected by COVID-19 and is intended to provide interpretive guidance as to conditions that would constitute a short-term modification that would not meet the definition of a TDR. This includes the following (i) the loan modification is made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of December 31, 2020 or 60 days after the end of the coronavirus emergency declaration, and (ii) the applicable loan was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. Bancorp is applying this guidance to qualifying loan modifications and has implemented modifications meeting these conditions Federal bank regulatory authorities also issued guidance to encourage banks to make loan modifications for borrowers affected by COVID-19 and to assure banks that they will not be criticized by examiners for doing so.
Six months ended June 30, (In thousands, except per share data)

2019

2018

$ Change

% Change

Net income
$ 32,184 $ 26,983 $ 5,201 19.3 %
Diluted earnings per share
$ 1.40 $ 1.17 $ 0.23 19.7 %
Annualized return on average assets
1.93 % 1.75 %
18 bps
10.3 %
Annualized return on average equity
17.25 % 16.05 %
120 bps
7.5 %

~~Overview~~The PPP directly impacted Bancorp’s financial condition and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~ ~~compared with same period in 2018~~
Bancorp completed the first six months of 2019 with record net income of $32.2 million, a 19.3% increase over the comparable period in 2018. The increase is primarily due to higher net interest income driven by year-over-year average loan growth, higher non-interest income led by WM&T and debit and credit card income, and a lower effective income tax rate resulting from Kentucky tax law changes. Diluted earnings per share for the first six months of 2019 were $1.40, compared to $1.17 for the first six months of 2018.
~~Key factors affecting Bancorp’s results for the six months ended June 30, 2019 included:~~
●
Average loans increased $115.4 million, or 4.7%, year over year as a result of strong loan production and the May 1, 2019 King acquisition, contributing to a 16.6% increase in interest income. Total average deposits increased 9.8% to support loan growth, reflecting strong growth in time deposits and the impact of the King acquisition;
●
~~Net interest income increased $4.4 million or 7.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2019, due largely to a $8.4 million increase in interest income earned on loans;~~
●
~~Net interest margin rose 1 basis point compared with the same period of 2018 as interest income stemming from asset growth offset increased interest expense resulting from deposit rate increases;~~
●
Credit quality metrics remained sound, including net loan loss recoveries for the first six months of 2019, leading to reduced provision for loan and lease losses (“provision”) of $600 thousand, as compared with $2.0 million for the comparable 2018 period;
●
~~WM&T, buoyed by a strong second quarter market and new business generation, achieved 2.4% revenue growth year over year;~~
53

~~Table of Contents~~
●
~~Card income and treasury management fees, bolstered by increased volume and usage, continued to stand out as diversifying non-interest revenue streams; and~~
●
~~Bancorp’s effective income tax rate declined to 8.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 based on changes made to Kentucky state tax law during the first and second quarters of 2019.~~
~~Net interest income increased $4.4 million, or 7.9%, for the first six months of 2019,~~2020 as compared with the same period in 2018. Net interest margin increased to 3.85% for the first six months of 2019, compared with 3.84% for the same period of 2018. Increasing average rates earned on interest earning assets, along with the impact of increased volumes of loans and short-term investments contributed to higher interest income for the first six months of 2019, as interest income increased $10.2 million, or 16.6%, over the same period in 2018. Average earning asset growth attributable to the May 1, 2019 King acquisition totaled $56 million for the six-month comparison period. Higher long-term borrowing costs assumed in the King acquisition, along with a shift in deposits from non-interest bearing accounts to interest bearing accounts resulted in an increase in interest expense of $5.8 million. Interest paying liabilities assumed as part of the King acquisition contributed $47.1 million of the total $149.6 million average interest bearing liabilities growth for the six month comparison. The average balance of time deposits increased $144.8 million, or 61.2% in the first six months of 2019, as compared with the same period in 2018, as a result primarily of targeted marketing campaigns initiated in 2018 to support loan growth and add liquidity to the balance sheet. The corresponding cost of time deposits increased from 0.86% for the first six months of 2018 to 1.93% for the same period in 2019.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2019, Bancorp recorded a $600 thousand provision, compared with $2.0 million for the same period in 2018. The provision represents a charge to earnings necessary to maintain an allowance that, in management’s estimation, is adequate to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision reflects many factors including trends in the portfolio, as well as changes in quantitative and qualitative factors. Reflecting continued strong credit quality metrics, and net recoveries of $282 thousand in the first six months of 2019, the allowance to total loans was 0.96% as of June 30, 2019, compared with 0.96% as of June 30, 2018. In management’s opinion, the allowance remained adequate to cover potential losses within the portfolio.
Total non-interest income for the first six months of 2019 increased $981 thousand, or 4.4%, compared with the same period in 2018. Non-interest income comprised 27.9% of total revenues, defined as net interest income and non-interest income, as compared with 28.5% for the same period in 2018. Bancorp’s WM&T services comprised 47.6% of Bancorp’s non-interest income. Debit and credit card revenue, as a result of increasing transaction volumes and incentives paid by the credit card processor, increased $715 thousand, or 22.4% in the first six months of 2019, as compared with the same period in 2018. Treasury management fees, a steadily growing source of revenue for Bancorp, increased $199 thousand, or 9.2%, in the first half of 2019, as compared with the first half of 2018. These items offset declines of $275 thousand, and $81 thousand, for deposit service charges and investment product sales commissions and fees, respectively, for the first six months of 2019, as compared with 2018.
Total non-interest expense in the first six months of 2019 increased $4.9 million, or 11.4%, compared with the same period in 2018. Increases in compensation, technology and communication, legal and professional fees, and other expenses drove the increase. Costs associated with the King acquisition recognized during 2019 totaled $1.3 million approximately, or $0.05 net income per diluted share, and were spread primarily between compensation and legal and professional fees. Bancorp's efficiency ratio, reflecting the one-time transaction costs associated with the King acquisition recognized in the first six months of 2019 was 57.36%, as compared with 54.98% in the same period in 2018.
Bancorp recorded income tax expense of $2.9 million for the first six months of 2019, compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2018. The effective rate for the corresponding six month periods was 8.2% and 18.7%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2018 to 2019 related primarily to Kentucky state tax law changes as discussed below:follows:

●
~~In March 2019,~~During the ~~Kentucky Legislature passed HB354 requiring financial institutions~~second quarter of 2020, 3,250 loans totaling $647 million were originated, with the PPP portfolio representing 18% of total loans outstanding at June 30, 2020.
●
While the PPP was primarily offered to ~~transition~~Bancorp’s customer base to limit fraud risk, Bancorp added approximately 350 new relationship prospects that have begun the process of migrating over their full commercial banking relationship.
●
With origination fees ranging between 1% and 5% based on the size of the loan, Bancorp received $20 million in origination fees from ~~a capital based franchise tax to~~ the ~~Kentucky corporate income tax beginning in 2021. Historically, the franchise tax, a component of non-interest expenses, was assessed at 1.1% of net capital and averaged $2.5 million annually~~SBA that will be recognized over the prior two year-end periods. The Kentucky corporate income tax will be assessed at 5% of Kentucky taxable income and will be included as a component of current and deferred state income tax expense. Associated with this change, during the first quarter of 2019, Bancorp established a Kentucky state deferred tax asset related to existing temporary differences estimated to reverse after the effective dateterm of the law change. Bancorp recorded a corresponding state tax benefit, net of federal impact of $1.3 million, or approximately $0.06 per diluted share for the first six months of 2019. While this is positive in the short-term, Bancorp anticipates an unfavorable impact of approximately $200 thousand per year beginning in 2021.loans (predominantly 24 months).

54
60
Table of Contents

●
InApproximately $3.4 million in interest and fee income was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2020. While this had a positive impact to interest income and net interest income, the 1% stated yield on the PPP portfolio negatively impacted the overall loan portfolio yield and NIM.
●
Based on the 100% SBA guarantee of PPP loans, Bancorp did not reserve for potential losses within the ACL on these loans.
●
Bancorp experienced a significant increase in deposit balances (both average and ending) directly related to customers who originated PPP loans.
●
A portion of Bancorp’s customer base paid down existing operating C&I lines of credit in part with excess liquidity resulting from PPP loans, a sign of the strength of certain borrowers.
●
Bancorp relied on deposit growth in addition to excess cash on hand to fund the PPP loans with no reliance placed on external funding sources. Maintaining excess liquidity related to the PPP loan portfolio contributed to overall NIM compression.
●
With regard to Bancorp’s compensation expense, the origination of the PPP loans led to elevated levels of deferred salary costs with the offset to deferred loan fees and amortized over the term of the related loans.
●
Consistent with the historic decline in credit utilization coupled with the adoption of ASC-326, Bancorp incurred a significant increase in reserves for off-balance sheet credit exposures recorded as a component of non-interest expenses.
●
Bancorp’s leverage ratio, which consists of tier-1 capital divided by adjusted quarterly average assets, was negatively impacted by the outsized balance sheet growth attributed to PPP participation. This will normalize over time, as PPP loans pay-off early or ultimately mature. Bancorp and the Bank remained “well capitalized” in all other capital ratios at June 30, 2020.
Other pandemic-related impacts to Bancorp’s financial condition and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 as follows:
●
As previously disclosed, on March 16, 2020, the FRB responded to the pandemic by lowering the FFTR to a range of 0% - 0.25% resulting in Prime dropping to 3.25%.
●
Loan loss provisioning for the second quarter of 2020 was significantly impacted by the economic crisis and corresponding impact on national unemployment forecast adjustments within the CECL model, changes in the loan mix and the addition of a large specific reserve during the second quarter.
●
Bancorp deferred either the full loan payment or the principal only portion of respective loan payments for 90 or 180 days for some borrowers directly impacted by the pandemic.  As of June 30, 2020, Bancorp executed 1,100 of full payment deferrals (predominantly 3 months) on outstanding loan balances of $502 million - representing 18% of the loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans). Approximately 85% of the total deferrals processed (in terms of dollars) occurred in the month of April, with the subsequent pace slowing significantly. Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals were not classified as TDRs and not included in non-performing loan statistics. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter and through the end of July, a significant portion of the deferred loan portfolio returned to full paying status. As of July 31, 2020, Bancorp estimates that 10% of the total loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) remained in full payment deferment status. Bancorp is monitoring loan modification expirations daily and anticipates the potential for more customers to return to full payment status over the next two months as their initial deferral period ends. While the modifications themselves did not trigger a loan risk rating downgrade, if the impact of COVID-19 continues, borrower operations do not improve or if other negative events occur, such modified loans could transition to potential problem loans or into problem loans.
●
Deposit balance for both commercial customers who received PPP funding and those that did not were elevated at June 30, 2020 based on the deferment of tax payments.
●
Consistent with the industry, deposit service charges and debit/credit card income were impacted by pandemic driven changes in customer behavior. This led to among other things, lower transaction volumes and types of spending during April and May with June showing notable improvement for the quarter.
●
Bancorp did not incur material non-interest expenses related to the execution of its pandemic plan first placed in service in March.
o
During the second quarter of 2020, debit/credit card processing expense declined directionally consistent with the decline in revenue noted above.
o
Marketing and business development expenses include all costs associated with promoting Bancorp, community support, retaining customers and acquiring new business. Marketing and business development expenses decreased sharply during the second quarter corresponding directly with less physical customer interaction as a result of the pandemic.
In tandem with the declaration of the global pandemic, Bancorp invoked its Board approved pandemic plan, which included timely communication to employees, implementing remote work arrangements to the full extent possible, separating individual departments, operating select branch lobbies by appointment only, fully staffing all branch drive-thru lanes, communicating with and encouraging our customers to use Bancorp’s free self-service tools such as ITMs/ATMs, online banking, mobile banking and bill pay and actively promoting social distancing in all aspects of business.
61
Table of Contents
Bancorp has focused first on the well-being of its employees, customers and communities during this time. Preventative health measures were put in place and many employees worked remotely for the majority of the second quarter. Bancorp also established social distancing precautions for all employees in the office and customers visiting branches, preventative cleaning at offices and branches, and eliminated business related travel. Towards the end of the second quarter, Bancorp began returning employees to the office pursuant to new health and safety procedures and in accordance with guidance from the CDC and local authorities, including regular symptom checks, requiring cloth face coverings, increasing physical space between employees, and requiring employees with symptoms associated with COVID-19 or potential exposure to quarantine away from the office. Bancorp implemented business continuity measures as necessary throughout the pandemic including monitoring potential business interruptions. Bancorp has not incurred material expense related to executing the pandemic plan and no material operational or internal control challenges or risks have been identified to date.
Bancorp has taken measures both to support customers affected by the pandemic and to maintain strong asset quality, including:
●
Assisting business customers through PPP and other government sponsored loan products
●
Tightening underwriting standards
●
Monitoring portfolio risk and related mitigation strategies by segments
●
Limiting originations to higher risk industries and customers including, but not limited to, transportation, travel, hospitality, entertainment, and retail
●
Proactively contacting customers in order to assess credit situations and needs and develop long-term contingency financial plans
●
Offering flexible repayment options to current customers and a streamlined loan modification process, when appropriate
Management continues to meet regularly to anticipate and respond to any future pandemic interruptions or developments. Bancorp has not incurred any significant challenges to its ability to maintain its systems and controls in light of the measures taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and has not incurred significant resource constraints through the implementation of its business continuity plans and does not anticipate incurring such in the future. Bancorp has not made, and at this time does not expect to make, any material staffing or compensation changes as a result of the pandemic.
62
Table of Contents
Overview –Operating Results(FTE)
The following table presents an overview of Bancorp’s financial performance for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019:
Three months ended June 30, (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Net income
$ 13,368 $ 16,543 $ (3,175 ) -19 %
Diluted earnings per share
$ 0.59 $ 0.72 $ (0.13 ) -18 %
Annualized return on average assets
1.25 % 1.93 %
(68
) bps -35 %
Annualized return on average equity
12.90 % 17.40 %
(450
) bps -26 %
Additional discussion follows under the section titled “Results of Operations.”
General highlights for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to June 30, 2019:
●
Net income totaled $13.4 million, resulting in diluted EPS of $0.59, an 18% decline over $0.72 for the same period of 2019, the ~~Kentucky legislature passed HB458 allowing banks and their holding companies~~latter of which included a $2.4 million favorable non-recurring tax adjustment related to ~~be combined together for~~a Kentucky tax ~~return filings beginning~~law change that equated to $0.11 per diluted share in ~~2021. The combined filing will allow Bancorp’s Holding Company~~addition to significant acquisition deal costs that equated to $0.05 per diluted share.
●
NIM decreased 54 bps to 3.27% for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to 3.81% for the same period in 2019 consistent with the large decline in interest rates led by the FRB, the significant addition of the low yielding PPP loan portfolio and excess balance sheet liquidity; offset by strong average quarter over prior quarter loan growth (excluding PPP loans) and the strategic lowering of stated deposit interest rates and CD offering rates in tandem with the FRB interest rate actions.
●
Despite the decline in NIM, net ~~operating losses~~interest income increased $2.7 million, or 9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to ~~offset against net revenue generated by The Bank and reduce Bancorp’s tax liability. Bancorp recorded a state tax benefit~~the same period in 2019 based on the fee income recognized associated with ~~this change~~the PPP portfolio and significant benefit from the strategic lowering of ~~$2.4~~stated deposit rates.
●
Total loans (excluding PPP loans) contracted $103 million during the second quarter of 2020. C&I loan balances led the decline, falling $119 million. Average loans (excluding PPP loans) increased 8% for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, driven by strong organic loan growth within Bancorp’s three markets over the previous 12 months in addition to the May 2019 acquisition.
●
Both ending and quarterly average deposit balances ended at record levels at June 30, 2020, primarily as a result of PPP funding in addition to higher levels of liquidity held by customers attributable to current economic uncertainty.
●
The quarter ended June 30, 2020 was the second in which Bancorp accounted for credit losses under ASC 326,orCECL. Despite continued minimal net charge-offs and overall strong credit metrics, significant provisioning occurred based on the economic crisis and corresponding impact on national unemployment forecast adjustments within the CECL model, changes in the loan mix and the addition of a large specific reserve during the second quarter totaling $2 million related to one CRE customer. Consistent with the significant decline in line utilization (mainly C&I) experienced in the second quarter of 2020, Bancorp also recorded $1.5 million in additional non-interest expense related to credit exposure for unfunded off-balance sheet commitments. At June 30, 2020, approximately $6 million was accrued within other liabilities related to off balance sheet exposures.
●
Bancorp’s ACL to total loans was 1.38% at June 30, 2020, compared to 1.43% at March 31, 2020 and 0.94% at December 31, 2019. Bancorp’s ACL to total loans (excluding PPP loans) rose to 1.68% at June 30, 2020.
●
Non-interest income increased 3% for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019:
o
Despite economic uncertainty and market volatility, WM&T income increased for the quarterly comparison.
o
As noted above, deposit service charges and debit/credit card income were negatively impacted by the pandemic during the quarter.
o
The Treasury Management department was able to overcome the significant decline in pandemic related transaction volume with new product sales and expansion within its customer base. The demand for treasury products has increased during the pandemic, as these products allow customers to operate more efficiently in a decentralized environment.
o
The sustained low interest rate environment led to elevated mortgage refinancing activity and record mortgage banking results.
●
Bancorp’s efficiency ratio (FTE) for the three months ended June 30, 2020, was 53.87% compared with 59.08% for the same period in 2019, the latter of which included $1.3 million in one-time deal costs associated with an acquisition.
●
Non-interest expenses remained well-controlled and declined 2% for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 despite the addition of branches, personnel and increased provisioning for off-balance sheet credit exposures.
●
The ETR increased to 14.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2020 from 5.9% for the same period in 2019. The second quarter of 2019 reflected a $2.4 million non-recurring state tax adjustment related to Kentucky tax law changes.
63
Table of Contents
The following table presents an overview of Bancorp’s financial performance for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019:
Six months ended June 30, (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Net income
$ 26,600 $ 32,184 $ (5,584 ) -17 %
Diluted earnings per share
$ 1.17 $ 1.40 $ (0.23 ) -16 %
Annualized return on average assets
1.33 % 1.93 %
(60
) bps -31 %
Annualized return on average equity
13.04 % 17.25 %
(421
) bps -24 %
Additional discussion follows under the section titled “Results of Operations.”
General highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to June 30, 2019:
●
The momentum associated with a record 2019 was halted late in the first quarter by the COVID-19 pandemic. Uncertain economic conditions, a substantially lower interest rate environment and government stimulus action have had a significant impact on Bancorp’s results, mainly during the second quarter of 2020 as detailed in the previous section of the document.
●
Effective January 1, 2020, Bancorp began accounting for credit losses under ASC 326,or ~~approximately $0.11~~CECL. The adoption of this standard increased the opening balance of the ACL on loans by $8.2 million and reserve for off-balance sheet exposures by $3.5 million as of January 1. The adoption entries reduced Bancorp’s retained earnings on a tax-effected basis of $8.8 million, with no impact on earnings. In addition, on January 1, 2020, the amortized cost basis of the PCD loans were adjusted upwards to reflect the addition of $1.6 million of the ACL on loans.
●
Net income totaled $26.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, resulting in diluted EPS of $1.17, a 16% decline from the same period in 2019, the latter of which included $3.8 million in non-recurring tax adjustments related to two Kentucky tax law changes that equated to $0.17 per diluted share in addition to significant acquisition deal costs, which equated to $0.05 per diluted share.
●
The FRB has lowered the FFTR five times since June 30, 2019, resulting in a combined 225 bps decrease in the FFTR over the last 12 months. The most recent of these cuts occurred in mid-March 2020, when the FRB lowered the FFTR to a range of 0% - 0.25% in response to the pandemic - the lowest level seen since late 2015. Bancorp has lowered the stated rate of interest-bearing deposit account types and CD offering rates in tandem with these cuts and further decreases in the interest rate environment.
●
NIM decreased 38 bps to 3.47% for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to 3.85% for the same period in 2019 consistent with the lowering of the FFTR, the PPP portfolio and excess balance sheet liquidity; offset by strong average year over prior year loan growth (excluding PPP loans) and the strategic lowering of stated deposit interest rates and CD offering rates in tandem with FRB interest rate actions.
●
Despite the decline in NIM, net interest income increased $5.5 million, or 9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 based on the fee income recognized associated with the PPP portfolio and significant benefit from the strategic lowering of stated deposit rates.
●
Total loans (excluding PPP loans) contracted $11 million during the first six months of 2020, with the second quarter decline completely reversing the first quarter growth of $92 million fueled by robust and record first quarter production. During 2020, a $67 million increase in the CRE portfolio was offset by a $74 million decline in the C&I portfolio – primarily operating lines of credit.
●
Despite flat line of credit usage for the first quarter of 2020, usage declined significantly to 39% at June 30, 2020 compared to 48% at June 30, 2019.
●
Both ending and year to date average deposit balances ended at record levels at June 30, 2020, primarily as a result of PPP funding in addition to higher levels of liquidity held attributable to current economic uncertainty.
●
Despite continued minimal net charge-offs and overall strong credit metrics, significant provisioning occurred based on the economic crisis and corresponding impact on national unemployment forecast adjustments within the CECL model, changes in the loan mix and the addition of a large specific reserve during the second quarter totaling $2 million related to one CRE relationship. Consistent with the significant decline in line utilization (mainly C&I), Bancorp also recorded $1.9 million in additional non-interest expense related to credit exposure for unfunded off-balance sheet commitments, with $1.5 million of the expense recorded in the second quarter of 2020. At June 30, 2020, approximately $6 million was accrued within other liabilities related to off balance sheet exposures.
●
Bancorp’s ACL to total loans was 1.38% at June 30, 2020, compared to 0.94% at December 31, 2019. Bancorp’s ACL to total loans (excluding PPP loans) was 1.68% at June 30, 2020.
●
Non-interest income increased 8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 led by mortgage banking and WM&T income. The sustained low interest rate environment has continued to incentivize record mortgage refinancing activity and WM&T income was boosted by a large non-recurring estate fee collected in the first quarter of 2020. Card income and treasury management fees also continued to stand out as diversifying revenue streams, representing a combined 26% of total non-interest income.
●
Bancorp’s efficiency ratio (FTE) for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was 53.53% compared with 57.34% for the same period in 2019, the latter of which included $1.3 million in one-time deal costs associated with an acquisition closed in the prior year.
●
Non-interest expenses, which have remained well-controlled, increased 2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 despite the addition of branches, personnel and other expenses related to the May 2019 acquisition and increased provisioning for off-balance sheet credit exposures.
●
The ETR increased to 14.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2020 from 8.2% for the same period in 2019, the latter of which reflected $4.0 million in non-recurring tax adjustments related to two Kentucky tax law changes.
●
TCE is a measure of a company’s capital, which is useful in evaluating the quality and adequacy of capital. Bancorp’s ratio of TCE to total tangible assets was 9.39% as of June 30, 2020, compared with 10.55% at December 31, 2019 and 10.85% at June 30, 2019. The fluctuation from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020 was driven by asset growth (mainly PPP loans), the change in AOCI and CECL related adjustments. See the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for reconcilement of non-GAAP to GAAP measures.
64
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income - Overview
As is the case with most banks, Bancorp’s primary revenue sources are net interest income and fee income from various financial services provided to customers. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on loans, investment securities and other interest earning assets less interest expense on deposit accounts and other interest bearing liabilities. Loan volume and interest rates earned on those loans are critical to overall profitability. Similarly, deposit volume is crucial to funding loans and rates paid on deposits directly impact profitability. New business volume is influenced by economic factors including market interest rates, business spending, consumer confidence and competitive conditions within the marketplace.
Comparative information regarding net interest income follows:
As of and for the three months ended June 30,

Variance

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

2020 / 2019

Net interest income
$ 33,528 $ 30,802 8.9
%
Net interest spread
3.10 % 3.47 % (37 ) bps
Net interest margin
3.27 % 3.81 % (54 ) bps
Average interest earning assets
$ 4,124,046 $ 3,244,941 27.1
%
As of and for the six months ended June 30,

Variance

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

2020 / 2019

Net interest income
$ 65,974 $ 60,486 9.1
%
Net interest spread
3.27 % 3.52 % (25 ) bps
Net interest margin
3.47 % 3.85 % (38 ) bps
Average interest earning assets
$ 3,823,598 $ 3,173,069 20.5
%
The discussion that follows is based on FTE data.
NIM and net interest spread calculations above exclude the sold portion of certain participation loans. These sold loans are on Bancorp’s balance sheet as required by GAAP because Bancorp retains some form of effective control; however, Bancorp receives no interest income on the sold portion. These participation loans sold are excluded from analysis, as Bancorp believes it provides a more accurate depiction of the performance of its loan portfolio.
Bancorp’s loan portfolio is currently composed of approximately 71% fixed and 29% variable rate loans, with the fixed rate portfolio pricing based on a spread to the five-year treasury curve at the time of origination and the variable portion pricing based on an on-going spread to Prime (approximately 60%) or one month LIBOR (approximately 40%). Bancorp’s loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) at June 30, 2020 was composed of approximately 65% fixed and 35% variable rate loans with the fluctuation in the C&I portfolio driving down variable rate concentration for the quarter.
The FRB has lowered the FFTR five times since June 30, 2019, resulting in a combined 225 bps decrease in the FFTR over the last 12 months. The most recent of these cuts came in mid-March 2020 when the FRB lowered the FFTR to a range of 0% - 0.25% in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the lowest level seen since late 2015. The following table details the volatility experienced within the interest rate environment over the past several months by comparing period end and quarterly average rates:

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

June 30,

March 31,

2020

2020

2019

2019

2019

Five-year Treasury note - period end
0.29 % 0.37 % 1.69 % 1.76 % 2.23 %
Five-year Treasury note - quarterly average
0.36 % 1.14 % 1.61 % 2.12 % 2.46 %
Prime rate - period end
3.25 % 3.25 % 4.75 % 5.50 % 5.50 %
Prime rate - quarterly average
3.25 % 4.40 % 4.83 % 5.50 % 5.50 %
One-month LIBOR - period end
0.16 % 0.99 % 1.79 % 2.40 % 2.49 %
One-month LIBOR - quarterly average
0.35 % 1.40 % 2.22 % 2.44 % 2.50 %
65
Table of Contents
Bancorp has lowered the stated rate of interest-bearing deposit account types and CD offering rates in tandem with the above-mentioned FRB interest rate actions and managed to fully offset the decline in loan yields associated with the first two FFTR rate reductions, which occurred in August and September of 2019. The subsequent rate cuts in October 2019, and to a greater extent in March of 2020, have resulted in significant NIM compression, as further deposit rate reductions have not been able to fully off-set the decline in loan yields. As of June 30, 2020, current deposit rates are at or below rates offered during the Great Recession.
The short end of the treasury yield curve at both March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020 mirrored what was experienced during the Great Recession with the long end, particularly the five-year treasury, dramatically lower. While the curve normalized during the first quarter of 2020, the steep decline/inversion of the treasury curve that began in the second quarter of 2019 has led to intense pricing pressure and stiff competition over this period. With 60% of the variable rate loan portfolio tied to Prime and the majority with floor rates of 4.00%, short-term rates would have to increase over 75 bps for these loans to move above their floor rates given Prime is at 3.25% as of June 30, 2020. Beyond potential ongoing pricing pressure/competition and the absolute low level of rates, the current economic outlook and prospects of a sustained zero-rate environment continues to pose challenges regarding potential ongoing NIM compression.
Net Interest Income – Three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to June 30, 2019
Net interest spread and NIM were 3.10% and 3.27%, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to 3.47% and 3.81% for the same period in 2019. NIM during the three months ended June 30, 2020 was significantly impacted by:
●
The lowering of the FFTR between August 2019 and mid-March 2020, ending at a range of 0% - 0.25% resulting in Prime dropping to 3.25%.
●
PPP loan originations during the second quarter of 2020, with significant concentration during the month of April.
●
The strategic lowering of stated deposit interest rates and CD offering rates over the past 12 months in tandem with FRB interest rate actions.
●
Strong average loan growth (excluding PPP loans) related to both a prior year acquisition and organic growth.
●
Excess balance sheet liquidity.

~~The ratio~~During the second quarter of ~~stockholder’s equity to~~2020, 3,250 PPP loans totaling $647 million were originated, with the portfolio representing 18% of total ~~assets was 11.24% as of June 30, 2019, as compared with 11.10% at December 31, 2018, and 10.40%~~loans outstanding at June 30, ~~2018. Total equity increased $22.9~~2020. Origination fees ranged between 1% and 5% based on the size of the loan with the average fee equating to 3.12%. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, Bancorp received $20 million in origination fees from the ~~first six months~~SBA and recognized $2.1 million in fee income. While this had a positive impact to interest and fee income and net interest income, the 1% stated yield on the PPP portfolio negatively impacted the overall loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) yield and NIM by 27 bps and 11 bps, respectively. With a heavy concentration of ~~2019, as net income~~these loans originating in April, the average balance of ~~$32.2~~the portfolio ended at $529 million ~~was offset by dividends declared of $11.6 million and stock repurchases totaling $5.8 million. Bancorp’s ratio of tangible common equity (“TCE”) to total tangible assets was 10.85% as of~~for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 with a yield of 2.58% - significantly below the 4.31% yield on the loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) for the three months ended June 30, 2020.
With regard to the PPP, borrowers are eligible for forgiveness from the SBA for the portion of funding received utilized for job retention and certain other expenses, such as payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities during the 24-week period beginning with the date of the loan. With a significant portion of these loans potentially eligible for full forgiveness there is high likelihood of early pay off prior to maturity (24 months and 60 months for loans that originated post June 5, 2020). Early payoff of such would accelerate recognition of the fee (and to a lesser extent the deferred salary cost) and could have a material positive impact to future operating results.
Average FFS and interest bearing due from bank balances increased significantly for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with ~~11.05% at December 31, 2018, and 10.35% at~~the same period in 2019. This excess liquidity contributed to approximately 19 bps of NIM compression for the three months ended June 30, 2018, with the decline attributable to the KSB acquisition. TCE, (a non-U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (“GAAP”) measure), is a measure of a company's capital which is useful in evaluating the quality and adequacy of capital. See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section for details on reconcilement to GAAP measures.
~~Results of Operations~~2020.

Net interest income increased $2.7 million, or 9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period of ~~$16.5~~2019, led primarily by increased fee income associated with the PPP loan portfolio and decreased funding costs on deposits.
66
Table of Contents
Total average interest earning assets increased $879 million, or 27%, to $4.1 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2020, with the average rate earned on total interest earning assets contracting 102 bps to 3.56%.
●
Average loans increased $739 million, or 28%, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 with $529 million of this growth attributed to the PPP portfolio. Strong quarter over prior year quarter organic growth across all three markets in addition to the May 2019 acquisition has boosted the loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) average loans by $210 million over the past 12 months.
●
Average FFS/interest bearing due from bank balances increased $148 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 as compared with the same period in 2019, consistent with the increase in deposits.
Total interest income decreased $500,000, or 1%, to $36.6 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020, as compared to the same period of 2019.
●
Interest and fee income on loans increased $660,000, or 2%, to $34.1 million, attributed mainly to fee income associated with the PPP portfolio. Despite significant average loan balance (excluding PPP loans) growth, interest income declined $2.7 million, or 8%, consistent with significant interest rate contraction within the loan portfolio over the past 12 months.
●
With the exception of mortgage loans held for sale, interest income on the remaining interest earning asset portfolio was significantly impacted by the lower interest rate environment over the past 12 months coupled with significant average balance growth.
Total average interest bearing liabilities increased ~~$3.0~~$375 million, or ~~21.8%~~17%, ~~from $13.6 million~~to $2.6 billion for the ~~comparable 2018 period. Basic net income per share was $0.73~~three-month period ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019, with the total average cost declining 65 bps to 0.46%.
●
Average interest bearing deposits increased $388 million, or 18%, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, with interest-bearing demand deposits representing $284 million of the increase. Customers who received PPP loans, the proceeds for which were deposited into accounts held at the Bank, have generally been slow in deploying the funds. Further, the economic slow-down and uncertainty surrounding the pandemic has resulted in the customer base maintaining higher levels of liquidity in general, similar to behavior seen during the Great Recession.
●
Average FHLB advances decreased $9 million, or 12%, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period of 2019, as a portion of the advances assumed in a prior year acquisition have been paid off.
Total interest expense decreased $3.2 million, or 52%, for the ~~second quarter~~three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the same period of 2019, ~~an increase~~as a direct result of ~~21.7% from~~strategic deposit rate reductions implemented in response to the ~~$0.60~~changing interest rate environment.
●
Total interest bearing deposit expense decreased $3.0 million, or 54%, representing a 65 bps decrease in the cost of average interest bearing liabilities.
67
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income – Six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to June 30, 2019
Net interest spread and NIM were 3.27% and 3.47%, for the ~~second quarter of 2018. Net income per share on a diluted basis was $0.72 for the second quarter of 2019, an increase of 22.0% from the $0.59~~six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to 3.53% and 3.85% for the same period in ~~2018. See Note 12 for additional information related to net income per share.~~2019. NIM during the six months ended June 30, 2020 was significantly impacted by:

Annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average stockholders’ equity were 1.93% and 17.40%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2019, compared with 1.74% and 15.94%, respectively, for the same period in 2018.
●
The FFTR was lowered 225 bps between August 2019 and mid-March 2020, resulting in Prime dropping to 3.25%. Average Prime has declined significantly to 3.81% for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to 5.50% for the same period in 2019.
●
PPP loan originations
●
The strategic lowering of stated deposit interest rates and CD offering rates over the past 12 months in tandem with FRB interest rate actions.
●
Strong average loan (excluding PPP loans) growth related to both a prior year acquisition and organic growth.
●
Excess balance sheet liquidity that has carried over from the first quarter of 2020 and expanded.

~~Net~~During the first six months of 2020, Bancorp received $20 million in origination fees from the SBA and recognized $2.1 million in fee income. While this had a positive impact to interest and fee income and net interest income, the 1% stated yield on the PPP portfolio negatively impacted the overall loan portfolio yield and NIM by 17 bps and 7 bps, respectively. With a heavy concentration of ~~$32.2~~these loans originating in April, the average balance of the portfolio ended at $265 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $5.2 million, or 19.3%, from $27.0 million for~~2020 with a yield of 2.58% - significantly below the ~~comparable 2018 period. Basic net income per share was $1.42 for~~4.51% yield on the first six months of 2019, an increase of 19.3% from the $1.19 for the same period of 2018. Net income per share on a diluted basis was $1.40 for the first half of 2019, an increase of 19.7% from the $1.17 for the same period in 2018. See Note 12 for additional information related to net income per share.
~~Annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average stockholders’ equity were 1.93% and 17.25%, respectively,~~loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020.
Average FFS and interest bearing due from bank balances increased significantly for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with ~~1.75% and 16.05%, respectively, for~~ the same period in ~~2018.~~2019. This excess liquidity contributed to approximately 17 bps of NIM compression for the six months ended June 30, 2020.
Net interest income increased $5.5 million, or 9%, for the first six months of 2020 compared to the same period of 2019, led primarily by increased fee income associated with the PPP loan portfolio and decreased funding costs on deposits.
Total average interest earning assets increased $651 million, or 21%, to $3.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2020, with the average rate earned on total interest earning assets contracting 73 bps to 3.86%.
●
Average loans increased $551 million, or 21%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 with $265 million of the growth attributed to the PPP portfolio. In addition to the May 2019 acquisition, Bancorp has experienced strong organic growth across all three markets leading to a $286 million increase in the loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans). Significant average loan balance growth during the first quarter of 2020 was partially reversed with a $24 million decline during the second quarter of 2020.
●
Average FFS and interest bearing due from bank balances increased $97 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 as compared with the same period in 2019, consistent with the increase in deposits.
Total interest income increased $1.3 million, or 2%, to $73.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, as compared with the first six months of 2019.
●
Interest income on loans increased approximately $2.8 million, or 4%, to $67.9 million, attributed mainly to fee income associated with the PPP portfolio. Despite significant average loan (excluding PPP loans) balance growth, interest income declined $551,000, or 1%, consistent with significant interest rate contraction within the loan portfolio over the past 12 months. In addition, NIM and loan yields were positively impacted by a large non-accrual commercial relationship that paid off in the first quarter of 2020, triggering previously unrecognized non-accrual interest of $350,000 to be recognized.
●
With the exception of mortgage loans held for sale, interest income on the remaining interest earning asset portfolio was significantly impacted by the lower interest rate environment over the past 12 months coupled with significant average balance growth.
Total average interest bearing liabilities increased $332 million, or 15%, to $2.5 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2020 as compared with the same period in 2019, with the average cost decreasing 47 bps to 0.59%.
●
Average interest bearing deposits increased $328 million, or 16%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, with interest-bearing demand deposits representing $205 million of the increase. Customers who received PPP loans, the proceeds for which were deposited into accounts held at the Bank, have generally been slow in deploying the funds. Further, the economic slow-down and uncertainty surrounding the pandemic has resulted in the customer base maintaining higher levels of liquidity in general, similar to behavior seen during the Great Recession.
●
Average FHLB advances increased $8 million, or 14%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period of 2019, as a result of advances assumed in the May 2019 acquisition. These advances were retained by Bancorp based upon the favorable rates and terms at the time of acquisition in relation to the execution of Bancorp’s asset liability management strategy. A portion of these advances have either matured or been paid off without penalty during the first six months of 2020.
Total interest expense decreased $4.2 million, or 36%, for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the same period of 2019, as a direct result of strategic deposit rate reductions implemented in response to the changing interest rate environment.
●
Total interest bearing deposit expense decreased $4.1 million, or 39%, and representing a 49 bps decline in the cost of average interest bearing liabilities.

55
68
Table of Contents

~~Net~~Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest ~~Income~~Rates - Three-Month Comparison

The following tables present average balance sheets for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 along with the related calculation of tax-equivalent net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread for the related periods. See the notes following the tables for further explanation.

Three months ended June 30,

Three months ended June 30,

2019

2018

2020

2019

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

Average

(Dollars in thousands)

balances

Interest

rate

balances

Interest

rate

(dollars in thousands)

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

Earning assets:

Interest earning assets:

Federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks
$ 137,130 $ 830 2.43
%
$ 36,985 $ 163 1.77
%
$ 285,617 $ 88 0.12
%
$ 137,130 $ 830 2.43
%
Mortgage loans held for sale
3,794 43 4.55 2,975 44 5.93 18,010 125 2.79 3,794 43 4.55
Securities available for sale:

Taxable
410,201 2,395 2.34 358,637 1,996 2.23 401,750 2,066 2.07 410,201 2,395 2.34
Tax-exempt
25,190 162 2.58 42,732 288 2.70 10,618 72 2.73 25,190 162 2.58
FHLB stock
10,590 151 5.72 8,925 109 4.90
Loans, net of unearned income
2,658,036 33,442 5.05 2,523,450 29,489 4.69
Total securities
412,368 2,138 2.09 435,391 2,557 2.36

Total earning assets
3,244,941 37,023 4.58 2,973,704 32,089 4.33
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
11,284 70 2.50 10,590 151 5.72

Less allowance for loan losses
27,190 24,433
SBA Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans
529,361 3,392 2.58 — — —
Non-PPP loans
2,867,406 30,738 4.31 2,658,036 33,470 5.05
Total loans
3,396,767 34,130 4.04 2,658,036 33,470 5.05
3,217,751 2,949,271
Non-earning assets:

Total interest earning assets
4,124,046 36,551 3.56 3,244,941 37,051 4.58

Less allowance for credit losses
42,952 27,190

Non-interest earning assets:

Cash and due from banks
43,955 40,607 43,346 43,955
Premises and equipment, net
64,238 42,000 57,206 64,238
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
110,231 100,616

Bank Owned Life Insurance
32,814 33,038
Accrued interest receivable and other
102,970 77,193
Total assets
$ 3,436,175 $ 3,132,494 $ 4,317,430 $ 3,436,175

Interest bearing liabilities:

Deposits:

Interest bearing demand deposits
$ 843,768 $ 1,408 0.67
%
$ 792,193 $ 839 0.42
%
$ 1,128,075 $ 351 0.13
%
$ 843,768 $ 1,408 0.67
%
Savings deposits
169,883 109 0.26 158,561 61 0.15 188,931 5 0.01 169,883 109 0.26
Money market deposits
689,954 2,079 1.21 657,230 1,206 0.74 760,210 211 0.11 689,954 2,079 1.21
Time deposits
409,163 2,056 2.02 238,746 568 0.95 423,099 2,040 1.94 409,163 2,056 2.02
Total interest bearing deposits
2,112,768 5,652 1.07 1,846,730 2,674 0.58 2,500,315 2,607 0.42 2,112,768 5,652 1.07

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
39,969 28 0.28 61,993 33 0.21 41,517 8 0.08 39,969 28 0.28
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings
11,774 64 2.18 88,180 394 1.79
FHLB advances
72,923 424 2.33 48,929 229 1.88
Subordinated debt
1,497 26 6.97 — — —
Federal funds purchased
8,423 2 0.10 11,774 64 2.18
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
63,896 361 2.27 72,923 424 2.33
Subordinated note
— — — 1,497 26 6.97

Total interest bearing liabilities
2,238,931 6,194 1.11 2,045,832 3,330 0.65 2,614,151 2,978 0.46 2,238,931 6,194 1.11

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

Non-interest bearing demand deposits
754,592 701,642 1,213,136 754,592
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
61,382 43,383
Accrued interest payable and other
73,223 61,382
Total liabilities
3,054,905 2,790,857 3,900,510 3,054,905

Stockholders’ equity
381,270 341,637 416,920 381,270

Total liabilities and stockholder's equity
$ 3,436,175 $ 3,132,494 $ 4,317,430 $ 3,436,175
Net interest income
$ 30,829 $ 28,759 $ 33,573 $ 30,857
Net interest spread
3.47
%
3.68
%
3.10
%
3.47
%
Net interest margin
3.81
%
3.88
%
3.27
%
3.81
%

56
69
Table of Contents

Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates - Six-Month Comparison

Six months ended June 30,

2019

2018

Average

Average

Average

Average

(Dollars in thousands)

balances

Interest

rate

balances

Interest

rate

Earning assets:

Federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks
$ 129,701 $ 1,563 2.43
%
$ 53,991 $ 431 1.61
%
Mortgage loans held for sale
2,766 80 5.83 2,539 79 6.27
Securities available for sale:

Taxable
410,018 4,806 2.36 365,935 4,024 2.22
Tax-exempt
26,480 337 2.57 43,558 583 2.70
FHLB stock
10,392 308 5.98 8,310 219 5.31
Loans, net of unearned income
2,593,712 65,014 5.05 2,478,305 56,590 4.60

Total earning assets
3,173,069 72,108 4.58 2,952,638 61,926 4.23

Less allowance for loan losses
26,662 24,746
3,146,407 2,927,892
Non-earning assets:

Cash and due from banks
42,810 40,298
Premises and equipment, net
63,083 41,945
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
101,872 101,672

Total assets
$ 3,354,172 $ 3,111,807

Interest bearing liabilities:

Deposits:

Interest bearing demand deposits
$ 852,347 $ 2,811 0.67
%
$ 804,810 $ 1,462 0.37
%
Savings deposits
163,504 205 0.25 156,594 117 0.15
Money market deposits
683,767 4,054 1.20 671,883 2,159 0.65
Time deposits
381,358 3,648 1.93 236,577 1,013 0.86
Total interest bearing deposits
2,080,976 10,718 1.04 1,869,864 4,751 0.51
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
38,755 53 0.28 66,609 67 0.20
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings
11,602 124 2.16 57,391 483 1.70
FHLB advances
60,512 645 2.15 49,087 464 1.91
Subordinated debt
752 26 6.97 — — —

Total interest bearing liabilities
2,192,597 11,566 1.06 2,042,951 5,765 0.57

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

Non-interest bearing demand deposits
724,896 685,873
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
60,481 43,866
Total liabilities
2,977,974 2,772,690

Stockholders’ equity
376,198 339,117

Total liabilities and stockholder's equity
$ 3,354,172 $ 3,111,807
Net interest income
$ 60,542 $ 56,161
Net interest spread
3.52
%
3.66
%
Net interest margin
3.85
%
3.84
%

Six months ended June 30,

2020

2019

Average

Average

Average

Average

(dollars in thousands)

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

Interest earning assets:

Federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks
$ 227,090 $ 619 0.55
%
$ 129,701 $ 1,563 2.43
%
Mortgage loans held for sale
11,481 186 3.26 2,766 80 5.83
Securities available for sale:

Taxable
417,006 4,461 2.15 410,018 4,806 2.36
Tax-exempt
12,519 163 2.62 26,480 337 2.57
Total securities
429,525 4,624 2.16 436,498 5,143 2.38

Federal Home Loan Bank stock
11,284 141 2.51 10,392 308 5.98

SBA Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans
264,680 3,392 2.58 — — —
Non-PPP loans
2,879,538 64,518 4.51 2,593,712 65,069 5.06
Total loans
3,144,218 67,910 4.34 2,593,712 65,069 5.06

Total interest earning assets
3,823,598 73,480 3.86 3,173,069 72,163 4.59

Less allowance for credit losses
40,146 26,662

Non-interest earning assets:

Cash and due from banks
43,767 42,810
Premises and equipment, net
57,624 63,083
Bank Owned Life Insurance
32,725 32,687
Accrued interest receivable and other
96,207 69,185
Total assets
$ 4,013,775 $ 3,354,172

Interest bearing liabilities:

Deposits:

Interest bearing demand deposits
$ 1,057,079 $ 1,162 0.22
%
$ 852,347 $ 2,811 0.67
%
Savings deposits
179,503 23 0.03 163,504 205 0.25
Money market deposits
747,228 1,203 0.32 683,767 4,054 1.20
Time deposits
424,735 4,181 1.98 381,358 3,648 1.93
Total interest bearing deposits
2,408,545 6,569 0.55 2,080,976 10,718 1.04

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
37,465 24 0.13 38,755 53 0.28
Federal funds purchased
9,375 31 0.66 11,602 124 2.16
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
68,918 790 2.31 60,512 645 2.15
Subordinated note
— — — 752 26 6.97

Total interest bearing liabilities
2,524,303 7,414 0.59 2,192,597 11,566 1.06
Non-interest bearing liabilities:

Non-interest bearing demand deposits
1,008,302 724,896
Accrued interest payable and other
70,859 60,481
Total liabilities
3,603,464 2,977,974

Stockholders’ equity
410,311 376,198
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity
$ 4,013,775 $ 3,354,172
Net interest income
$ 66,066 $ 60,597
Net interest spread
3.27
%
3.53
%
Net interest margin
3.47
%
3.85
%

57
70
Table of Contents

~~Notes to the average balance~~Total Company Average Balance Sheets and ~~interest rate tables:~~Interest Rates - Supplemental Information

●
Average loan balances ~~for loans~~ include the principal balance of ~~non-accrual~~non-accrual loans, as well as ~~all~~unearned income such as loan premiums, discounts, fees and costs, and exclude participation loans ~~accounted~~accounted for as secured borrowings. P~~articipation~~articipation loans averaged ~~$10.~~$9million and $10 million ~~and $1~~~~7.1~~ ~~million, respectively,~~ for the ~~three month~~three-month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and ~~2018~~~~, and $10~~.2$8 millionand ~~$17.6~~$10 million ~~respectively~~ for the ~~six month~~six-month periods ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

●
Interest income on a ~~fully tax equivalent~~FTE basis includes additional amounts of interest income that would have been earned if investments in certain ~~tax-exempt~~tax-exempt interest earning assets had been made in assets subject to federal taxes ~~yielding~~yielding the same after-tax income. Interest income on municipal securities and tax-exempt loanshas been ~~calculated~~calculated on a ~~fully tax equivalent~~FTE basis using a federal income tax rate of 21% for ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~ 2019. Approximate tax equivalent ~~adjustments~~adjustments to interest income were $5$45 ~~thousand~~,000 and $8555 ~~thousand, respectively,~~ ,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~, 2019~~ and ~~2018~~~~, and~~ $92~~111~~,000 ~~thousand~~ and ~~$178 thousand~~$111,000 for the ~~respective~~ six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~.2019.

●
Interest income includes loan fees of $~~295~~2.4 million ~~thousand and $2~~9($2.1 million associated with the PPP) ~~7 thousand~~and $360,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and$2.8 million ~~2018, respectively,~~ and $$883~~776~~ ~~thousand and $514 thousand~~,000 for the ~~respective~~ six ~~month periods~~months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019.Interest income on loans may be impacted by the level of prepayment fees collected and accretion related to loan purchased.

●
Net interest income, the ~~most~~most significant component of ~~the Bank's~~Bancorp's earnings, represents total interest income less total interest expense. The level of net interest income is determined by mix and volume of interest earning assets, interest bearing deposits and borrowed funds, and changes in interest rates.
●
NIM represents net interest income on a FTE basis as a percentage of average interest earning assets.

●
Net interest spread is the difference between taxable equivalent rates earned on interest earning assets less the cost of interest bearing liabilities.

●
~~Net interest margin represents net interest income~~The fair market value adjustment on ~~a taxable equivalent basis~~investment securities resulting from ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities is included as a ~~percentage~~component of ~~average interest earning~~other assets. ~~Net interest margin is~~ ~~impacted~~ ~~by both interest rate spread and the level of non-interest bearing sources of funds, primarily consisting of demand deposits and stockholders’ equity.~~

Net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.47% and 3.81%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2019, and 3.68% and 3.88%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2018. Net interest margin was challenged in the second quarter of 2019 primarily due to the following:
●
While the Company has not aggressively pursued deposits since mid-2018, nor has it significantly raised rates, it has become more rate sensitive as deposit balances have migrated from non-interest bearing accounts to interest bearing accounts.
●
~~Asset yields were impacted by the downward trending of the overall rate environment, as fixed rate loan pricing and LIBOR based loans were impacted.~~
●
~~The second quarter 2018 margin was elevated by prepayment fees collected, with a much lighter impact experienced in the second quarter of 2019.~~
●
~~The King portfolio mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities had a slightly negative impact on margin overall.~~
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income of $30.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 increased $2.1 million, or 7.2%, from $28.8 million for the same period in 2018. Fully taxable equivalent interest income increased $4.9 million or 15.4% for the second quarter of 2019, as compared with the second quarter of 2018, due primarily to increased average loan balances stemming from loan growth fueled by record loan production and the King acquisition, as well as increased rates earned on loans. Wall Street Journal Prime interest rate was 50 to 75 basis points (“bps”) higher for much of the first half of 2019, as compared with 2018, which benefited short-term loan and investment pricing. Taxable securities, and federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks average balances also increased in the first half of 2019, as compared with 2018, as a result of Bancorp deploying excess liquidity into short-term investments, which earned higher yields year over year. In total, average earning assets increased $271.2 million or 9.1% to $3.2 billion for the three month period ended June 30, 2019, as compared with the same period in 2018, with the average rate on earnings assets increasing 25 bps to 4.58%. Earning assets resulting from the King acquisition averaged $119.6 million, and yielded 5.28% for the three months ended June 30, 2019.

58
71
Table of Contents
Interest expense increased due primarily to rising deposit costs, growth in interest bearing demand deposits and time deposits, and deposits assumed in the King acquisition. While the Company has not aggressively pursued deposits since mid-2018, nor has it significantly raised rates, deposit balances migrated from non-interest bearing accounts to interest bearing accounts during the period. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $193.0 million, or 9.4%, to $2.2 billion for the three month period ended June 30, 2019, as compared with the same period in 2018. Average interest bearing liabilities resulting from the King acquisition totaled $93.8 million in the second quarter. Growth in average interest bearing deposits was partially offset by declines in securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“SSUARs”). The average cost of interest bearing liabilities increased 46 bps to 1.11% for the second quarter of 2019, as compared with the second quarter of 2018. Bancorp increased rates paid on money market accounts in the first half of 2018 in addition to launching a marketing campaign promoting certificate of deposit accounts. Costs of money market deposit accounts and time deposits increased 47 bps, and 107 bps, respectively, in the second quarter of 2019, as compared with the same period in 2018. The average balance of securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“SSUARs”) decreased $22.0 million, or 35.5%, as customers migrated from lower yielding collateralized products to higher yielding non-collateralized deposits.
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income of $60.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 increased $4.4 million, or 7.8%, from $56.2 million for the same period in 2018. Positive effects of increased average balances on loans, resulting primarily from strong second quarter loan growth coupled with loans added in the King acquisition, and increased balances and rates on other earning assets, were partially offset by the negative effect of increasing rates for all funding sources. Interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities increased $220.4 million, or 7.5%, and $149.6 million, or 7.3%, respectively, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018. Net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.52% and 3.85%, respectively, for the first six months of 2019 and 3.66% and 3.84%, respectively, for the first six months of 2018.
Going forward, yield curve inversion could pose a significant challenge if loans were to be originated and repriced at a relatively low five-year portion of the treasury yield curve, while deposits and other funding sources priced or re-priced based upon a higher short end of the curve.
The Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) reduced the federal funds rate 25 bps in late July, with the prime lending rate experiencing a corresponding 25 bps decrease. Bancorp’s strategy in response to the rate reduction is to reduce deposit rates in order to fully offset the loss in revenue. Future rate decreases could have a negative impact on net interest margin, as additional reductions in deposit rates may not be sufficient to offset the potential loss in revenue.

Asset/Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk

Managing interest rate risk is fundamental for the financial services industry. The primary objective of interest rate risk management is to neutralize effects of interest rate changes on net income. By considering both on and off-balance sheet financial instruments, management evaluates interest rate sensitivity with the goal of optimizing net interest income within the constraints of prudent capital adequacy, liquidity needs, market opportunities and customer requirements.

Interest Rate Simulation Sensitivity Analysis

Bancorp uses an earnings simulation model to estimate and evaluate the impact of an immediate change in interest rates on earnings in a ~~one year~~one-year forecast. The simulation model is designed to reflect dynamics of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. By estimating effects of interest rate fluctuations, the model can approximate interest rate risk exposure. This simulation model is used by management to gauge approximate results given a specific change in interest rates at a given point in time. The model is therefore a tool to indicate earnings trends in given interest rate scenarios and may not indicate actual or expected results.

59

~~Table of Contents~~
The June 30, ~~2019~~2020 simulation ~~analysis, which shows minimal~~reflects the mid-March 2020 FRB action to lower the FFTR to near zero. Bancorp’s interest rate simulation sensitivity ~~indicates~~analysis details that increases in interest rates of 100 tobps would have a slightly negative effect on interest income, while an increase in rates of 200 ~~basis points~~bps would have a positive effect on net interest ~~income, and decreases~~income. These results are attributed to over half of ~~100~~the variable rate loan portfolio being currently at or near floor rates, as these yields will not increase until short-term rates exceed these floor rates. For example, a significant portion of the variable rate loan portfolio is tied to ~~200 basis points in interest~~Prime, with floor rates of 4.00%. Given Prime is at 3.25% as of June 30, 2020, short-term rates would have ~~a negative effect on net interest income. The mix of assets and liabilities acquired in the King transaction slightly increased Bancorp’s exposure~~ to ~~falling~~increase over 75 bps for these loans to move above their floor rates.
The overall ~~minimal~~ increase in net interest income in the rising rate scenarios is primarily due to variable rate loans and short-term investments repricing more quickly than deposits and short-term borrowings. Asset balances subject to immediate repricing cause an estimated decline in net interest income in the down 100 ~~and 200 basis point rate scenarios,~~bps scenario, as rates on non-maturity deposits cannot be lowered sufficiently to offset declining interest income. These estimates are summarized below.

Change in Rates

-200 -100
+100

+200

Basis Points

Basis Points

Basis Points

Basis Points

% Change from base net interest income at June 30, 2019
-10.14 % -1.37 % 3.01 % 6.03 %

Change in Rates

-200 -100
+100

+200

Basis Points

Basis Points

Basis Points

Basis Points

% Change from base net interest income at June 30, 2020
N/A -3.31 % -0.19 % 2.54 %

~~Approximately 60% of~~ Bancorp’s loan portfolio ~~has~~is currently composed of approximately 71% fixed ~~rates with 40% priced at variable rates. Bancorp’s~~and 29% variable rate loans, ~~are above their floors~~with the fixed rate portfolio pricing based on a spread to the five-year treasury curve at the time of origination and ~~will reprice as rates change.~~the variable portion pricing based on an on-going spread to Prime (approximately 60%) or one month LIBOR (approximately 40%). Bancorp’s loan portfolio (excluding PPPP loans) at June 30, 2020 was composed of approximately 65% fixed and 35% variable rate loans with the fluctuation in the C&I portfolio driving down variable rate percentage for the quarter.

~~Undesignated~~Periodically, Bancorp enters into interest rate swap transactions with borrowers who desire to hedge exposure to rising interest rates, while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap, with substantially matching terms, with another approved independent counterparty. These are undesignated derivative instruments ~~described in Note 17 to Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements~~and are recognized on the ~~consolidated~~ balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in other non-interest income as interest rates fluctuate. Because of matching terms of offsetting contracts, in addition to collateral provisions which mitigate the impact of non-performance risk, changes in fair value subsequent to initial recognition have a minimal effect on earnings, and are therefore not included in the simulation analysis results above. For additional information, see the footnote titled “Assets and Liabilities Measured and Reported at Fair Value.”

~~Derivatives~~In addition, Bancorp uses derivative financial instruments as part of its interest rate risk management, including interest rate swaps. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges as described in ~~Note 18~~the footnote titled “Derivative Financial Instruments.” For these derivatives, the effective portion of gains or losses is reported as a component of OCI, and is subsequently reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to ~~Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements are recognized on~~interest expense in periods in which the ~~consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value due to changes in prevailing interest rates, recorded net of tax in other comprehensive income.~~hedged forecasted transaction impacts earnings.

60
72
Table of Contents

Provision for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses

An analysis of the changes in the ACL on loans, including provision, and selected ratios follow:

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Beginning balance, prior to the adoption of ASC 326
$ 42,143 $ 26,464 $ 26,791 $ 25,534
Impact of adopting ASC 326
— — 8,221 —
Initial ACL on loans purchased with credit deterioration
— — 1,635 —
Provision for credit losses
5,550 — 11,100 600

Total charge-offs
(98 ) (161 ) (272 ) (260 )
Total recoveries
113 113 233 542
Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries
15 (48 ) (39 ) 282
ACL at the end of the period
$ 47,708 $ 26,416 $ 47,708 $ 26,416
Average loans
$ 3,396,767 $ 2,658,036 $ 3,144,218 $ 2,593,712
Provision to average loans (1)
0.16 % 0.00 % 0.35 % 0.02 %
Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans (1)
0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.01 %
ACL to average loans
1.40 % 0.99 % 1.52 % 1.02 %
ACL to total loans
1.38 % 0.96 % 1.38 % 0.96 %
(1) Ratios are not annualized
Provision represents the amount of expense that, based on Management’s judgment, is required to maintain the ACL on loans at an appropriate level under the CECL model. The ~~provision reflects results~~determination of the amount of the ACL on loans is complex and involves a high degree of judgment and subjectivity. See the footnote titled “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for detailed discussion regarding Bancorp’s ACL methodology by loan segment.
Upon adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, Bancorp recorded an ~~allowance methodology that is driven by risk ratings, historical~~increase of $8.2 million to the ACL on loans and a corresponding decrease to retained earnings, net of the DTA impact. In addition, non-accretable yield marks of $1.6 million related to formerly classified PCI loans were re-classed between the amortized cost basis of loans and corresponding ACL. The adjustment upon adoption of ASC 326 raised the ACL on loans balance to $37 million on January 1, 2020.
The ACL on loans totaled $48 million at June 30, 2020 compared to $42 million at March 31, 2020 and $27 million at December 31, 2019, representing an ACL to total loans ratio of 1.38%, 1.43% and 0.94% for the same period ends. The ACL to total loans (excluding PPP loans) was 1.68% at June 30, 2020. Based on the 100% SBA guarantee of the PPP loan portfolio, which totaled $630 million (net of unamortized deferred fees) at June 30, 2020, Bancorp did not reserve for potential losses ~~specific loan loss allocations,~~for these loans within the ACL.
Despite minimal charge-offs and ~~qualitative factors.~~overall strong credit metrics, Bancorp recorded provision for credit losses of $0$5.6 million and ~~$600 thousand~~$11.1 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019, respectively,~~2020, as compared with ~~$1.2 million~~$0 and ~~$2.0 million~~$600,000 for the same periods in ~~2018.~~ 2019. As detailed below, provisioning in 2020 has been significantly impacted by the economic crisis and corresponding impact on national unemployment forecast adjustments within the CECL model, changes in the loan mix and the addition of a large specific reserve during the second quarter of 2020.
The forecasted increase in national unemployment coupled with the qualitative factor adjustments resulted in approximately $4.2 million and $4.6 million of the total provision ~~represents a charge to earnings necessary to maintain an allowance that, in management’s evaluation, is adequate to provide coverage~~expense recorded for the ~~inherent losses on outstanding loans. The~~three months ended March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020.
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2019, Bancorp recorded a $600,000 provision ~~reflects many factors including trends~~consistent with a moderate increase in ~~the portfolio, as well as changes in quantitative and qualitative factors. Continued strong credit metrics~~classified loans and net recoveries of ~~$282 thousand for the first six months of 2019 resulted in an allowance to total loans of 0.96% as of June 30, 2019, compared with 0.96% as of June 30, 2018.~~$330,000. In ~~management’s opinion, the allowance remained adequate to cover potential losses within the portfolio.~~
Key indicators of loan quality remained consistent with the prior year with the exception of increased classified balances, defined as other assets especially mentioned (“OAEM”), substandard, and non-performing loans, which increased $23.4 million during the first half of 2019, as compared with December 31, 2018. The increase was concentrated in OAEM loans, as two commercial relationships, which were well-secured, moved from the Watch category into OAEM. Consistent with Bancorp’s methodology,addition, Bancorp extended the historical look-back period ~~was extended~~within the incurred loss model from 32 to 36 quarters ~~in the first quarter of 2019~~ to ~~all classes and segments of the portfolio. Management believes the expansion of the look-back period~~ more accurately ~~represents~~represent the ~~current~~then-current level of risk in the loan portfolio ~~and captures~~by capturing the effects of a full economic cycle. Based on the look-back period extension, the ~~allowance level~~ACL increased approximately $2.0 million for the first three months of 2019. ~~Additional information regarding Bancorp’s methodology~~No provision was recorded for ~~evaluating~~ the ~~adequacy of the allowance can be read in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~
~~Non-performing loans, consisting of TDRs, non-accrual loans, and loans over 90 days past due still accruing, increased to $3.9 million at~~three months ended June 30, 2019 from $3.4 million at December 31, 2018, while decreasing $3.5 million from $7.4 million at June 30, 2018. Bancorp considers the present asset quality metrics to be exceptional; however, recognizing the cyclical nature of the lending business, this trend is expected to normalize over the long term.
Bancorp’s loan portfolio is diversified with no significant concentrations of credit. Geographically, most loans are extended to borrowers in the metropolitan areas of Louisville, Indianapolis and Cincinnati. The adequacy of the allowance is monitored on an ongoing basis and it is the opinion of management that the balance of the allowance at June 30, 2019 is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the financial statement date.2019.

61
73
Table of Contents
~~An analysis of the changes in the allowance and selected ratios follows:~~
(Dollars in thousands)

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

2019

2018

2019

2018

Balance at the beginning of the period
$ 26,464 $ 24,203 $ 25,534 $ 24,885
Provision
— 1,235 600 1,970
Total charge-offs
161 647 260 2,175
Total recoveries
(113 ) (82 ) (542 ) (193 )
Total net loan charge-offs (recoveries)
48 565 (282 ) 1,982
Balance at the end of the period
$ 26,416 $ 24,873 $ 26,416 $ 24,873
Average loans, net of unearned income
$ 2,658,036 $ 2,523,450 $ 2,593,712 $ 2,478,305

Provision to average loans (1)
0.00 % 0.05 % 0.02 % 0.08 %
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans (1)
0.00 % 0.02 % (0.01 )% 0.08 %
Allowance to average loans
0.99 % 0.99 % 1.02 % 1.00 %
Allowance to total loans
0.96 % 0.96 % 0.96 % 0.96 %
~~(1) Amounts not annualized~~
Loans are charged off when deemed uncollectible and a loss is identified or after underlying collateral has been liquidated; however, collection efforts may continue and future recoveries may occur. Periodically, loans are partially charged off to net realizable value based upon collateral analysis and collection status. One significant commercial and industrial loan relationship totaling $1.3 million was charged off to its net realizable value in the first quarter of 2018, which resulted in increased net charge offs for the six month period ending June 30, 2018. The increase in the allowance in the second quarter of 2019 as compared with the same period in 2018 was mainly due to qualitative considerations and net recoveries of $282 thousand.
~~An analysis of net charge-offs (recoveries) by loan portfolio segment follows:~~

Three months

Six months

(In thousands)

ended June 30,

ended June 30,

2019

2018

2019

2018

Commercial and industrial
$ (4 ) $ 528 $ (103 ) $ 1,927
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— — (203 ) —
Undeveloped land
— — — —
Real estate mortgage - commercial investment
(1 ) — (1 ) (2 )
Real estate mortgage - owner occupied commercial
— — (20 ) —
Real estate mortgage - 1-4 family residential
(17 ) — (17 ) —
Home equity
(1 ) (2 ) (1 ) (4 )
Consumer
71 39 63 61
Total net loan charge-offs (recoveries)
$ 48 $ 565 $ (282 ) $ 1,982
62

~~Table of Contents~~

Non-interest Income ~~and~~ ~~Non-interest~~ ~~Expenses~~

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2019

2018

$ Change

% Change

2019

2018

$ Change

% Change

Non-interest income:

Wealth management and trust services
$ 5,662 $ 5,344 $ 318 6.0
%
$ 11,101 $ 10,844 $ 257 2.4
%
Deposit service charges
1,336 1,447 (111 ) (7.7 ) 2,583 2,858 (275 ) (9.6 )
Debit and credit card income
2,168 1,689 479 28.4 3,912 3,197 715 22.4
Treasury management fees
1,202 1,113 89 8.0 2,359 2,160 199 9.2
Mortgage banking income
796 746 50 6.7 1,278 1,322 (44 ) (3.3 )
Net investment product sales commissions and fees
364 397 (33 ) (8.3 ) 720 801 (81 ) (10.1 )
Bank owned life insurance
184 191 (7 ) (3.7 ) 362 378 (16 ) (4.2 )
Other
551 508 43 8.5 1,010 784 226 28.8
Total non-interest income
$ 12,263 $ 11,435 $ 828 7.2
%
$ 23,325 $ 22,344 $ 981 4.4
%
Non-interest expenses:

Compensation
$ 12,715 $ 11,703 $ 1,012 8.6
%
$ 24,516 $ 22,673 $ 1,843 8.1
%
Employee benefits
2,908 2,512 396 15.8 5,550 5,145 405 7.9
Net occupancy and equipment
1,976 1,811 165 9.1 3,834 3,629 205 5.6
Technology and communication
1,848 1,685 163 9.7 3,621 3,315 306 9.2
Debit and credit card processing
631 579 52 9.0 1,218 1,145 73 6.4
Marketing and business development
903 805 98 12.2 1,528 1,451 77 5.3
Postage, printing, and supplies
410 400 10 2.5 816 791 25 3.2
Legal and professional
1,523 504 1,019 202.2 2,057 997 1,060 106.3
FDIC insurance
248 238 10 4.2 486 480 6 1.3
Amortization/impairment of investment in tax credit partnerships
52 58 (6 ) (10.3 ) 104 58 46 79.3
Capital and deposit based taxes
967 862 105 12.2 1,871 1,714 157 9.2
Other
1,283 979 304 31.1 2,502 1,765 737 41.8
Total non-interest expenses
$ 25,464 $ 22,136 $ 3,328 15.0
%
$ 48,103 $ 43,163 $ 4,940 11.4
%

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Wealth management and trust services
$ 5,726 $ 5,662 $ 64 1
%
$ 11,944 $ 11,101 $ 843 8
%
Deposit service charges
800 1,260 (460 ) (37 ) 2,083 2,438 (355 ) (15 )
Debit and credit card income
2,063 2,168 (105 ) (5 ) 4,043 3,912 131 3
Treasury management fees
1,249 1,202 47 4 2,533 2,359 174 7
Mortgage banking income
1,622 760 862 113 2,468 1,210 1,258 104
Net investment product sales commissions and fees
391 364 27 7 857 720 137 19
Bank owned life insurance
176 184 (8 ) (4 ) 355 362 (7 ) (2 )
Other
595 624 (29 ) (5 ) 875 1,130 (255 ) (23 )
Total non-interest income
$ 12,622 $ 12,224 $ 398 3
%
$ 25,158 $ 23,232 $ 1,926 8
%

Total non-interest income increased $398,000 and $1.9 million for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019. Non-interest income comprised 27.3% and 27.6% of total revenues, defined as net interest income and non-interest income, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020 compared to 28.4% and 27.7% for the same periods in 2019. WM&T services comprised 45.4% and 47.5% of total non-interest income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 compared to 46.3% and 47.8% for the same periods of 2019.

~~Non-interest income~~Wealth Management and Trust ~~– WM&T~~Services:

~~The largest component of non-interest income is WM&T revenue.~~ The magnitude of WM&T revenue distinguishes Bancorp from other community banks of similar asset size. ~~Trust assets under management~~AUM, stated at market value, totaled $3.2 billion at June 30, 2020, an increase of 4% compared with $3.07 billion at June 30, 2019 ~~a 7.6% increase compared with $2.85 billion at June 30, 2018,~~ and a ~~11.0% increase~~4% decline from ~~$2.76~~$3.32 billion at December 31, ~~2018. AUM are stated at market value.~~2019. WM&T revenue ~~which represents approximately 46.2% of non-interest income,~~ increased ~~$318 thousand,~~$64,000, or ~~6.0%~~1%, and ~~$257 thousand,~~$843,000, or ~~2.4%~~8%, ~~respectively,~~ for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, as compared with the same periods of 2019. While stock market volatility associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the WM&T department, a large non-recurring estate fee from the first quarter of 2020 served to offset declines in ~~2018 consistent with increased new business generation and strong market performance for the quarter.~~market-based fee income.

Recurring fees earned for managing accounts are based on a percentage of market value of AUM and are typically assessed on a monthly basis. Recurring fees, which generally comprise ~~over 97%~~the vast majority of ~~the~~ WM&T revenue, increased ~~$225 thousand,~~$143,000, or ~~4.3%~~3%, and ~~$142 thousand~~$489,000, or ~~1.3%~~4%, ~~respectively,~~ for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, as compared with the same periods ~~in 2018. Some revenues~~ of ~~the~~2019. A portion of WM&T ~~department,~~revenue, most notably executor, insurance and some employee benefit plan-related fees, are non-recurring in nature and the timing of these revenues corresponds with the related administrative activities and is ~~also~~ based on the market value of AUM. For this reason, such fees are subject to more period over period fluctuation. Total non-recurring fees decreased $79,000, or 44%, and increased ~~$93 thousand~~$354,000, or ~~103.3% and $115 thousand or 59.5%~~115%, for the ~~respective~~ three and ~~six month~~six-month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, as compared with the same ~~time~~ periods of ~~2018.~~2019 with the increase for the six-month period attributed to the large estate fee previously noted. Contracts between WM&T and their clients do not permit ~~performance based~~performance-based fees and accordingly, none of the ~~fees~~fee income earned by WM&T are ~~performance based.~~performance-based. Management believes the WM&T department will continue to factor significantly in Bancorp’s financial results and provide strategic diversity to revenue streams.

63
74
Table of Contents

Trust Assets Under Management by Account Type

June 30, 2019

June 30, 2018

(In thousands)

Managed

Non-
managed (1)

Managed

Non-
managed (1)

Investment advisory accounts
$ 1,263,348 $ 20,251 $ 1,118,499 $ 18,121
Personal trust accounts
562,655 89,794 561,701 80,723
Personal individual retirement acounts
394,429 2,632 360,046 1,802
Corporate retirement accounts
48,073 397,708 49,548 394,067
Foundation and endowment accounts
216,789 1,247 196,268 -

Total accounts
$ 2,485,294 $ 511,632 $ 2,286,062 $ 494,713
Custody and safekeeping accounts
— 71,402 — 70,875

$ 2,485,294 $ 583,034 $ 2,286,062 $ 565,588
Total managed and non-managed assets
$ 3,068,328 $ 2,851,650
Detail of WM&T Service Income by Account Type:

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(in thousands)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Investment advisory
$ 2,277 $ 2,246 $ 4,699 $ 4,377
Personal trust and estate fees
1,904 1,894 4,090 3,698
Personal individual retirement
1,009 931 2,063 643
Company retirement
343 316 694 1,821
Foundation and endowment
138 140 282 273
Custody and safekeeping
27 30 60 61
Brokerage and insurance services
9 13 19 38
Other
19 92 37 190

Total WM&T services income
$ 5,726 $ 5,662 $ 11,944 $ 11,101
The preceding table demonstrates that WM&T fee revenue is concentrated within investment advisory and personal trust accounts. WM&T fees are predominantly based on AUM and tailored for individual/company accounts and/or relationships with fee structures customized based on account type and other factors with larger relationships paying a lower percentage of AUM in fees. For example, recurring AUM fee structures are in place for investment management, irrevocable trusts, revocable trusts, individual IRAs and accounts holding only fixed income securities. Company retirement plan services typically consist of a one-time conversion fee with recurring AUM fees to follow. While there are also fee structures for estate settlements, income received is often non-recurring in nature. Fees are agreed upon at the time the account is opened and any subsequent revisions are communicated in writing to the customer. Fees earned are not performance-based nor are they based on investment strategy or transactions.
Assets under Management by Account Type:
AUM (not included on balance sheet) decreased from $3.32 billion at December 31, 2019 to $3.20 billion at June 30, 2020 as follows:

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

Managed

Non-managed (1)

Managed

Non-managed (1)

Investment advisory
$ 1,314,388 $ 20,179 $ 1,347,389 $ 21,759
Personal trust
583,775 94,156 617,984 96,506
Personal individual retirement
438,146 2,900 437,193 2,799
Company retirement
44,161 391,194 45,097 436,188
Foundation and endowment
233,948 2,106 231,704 1,343

Total accounts
$ 2,614,418 $ 510,535 $ 2,679,367 $ 558,595
Custody and safekeeping
— 78,981 — 81,850

$ 2,614,418 $ 589,516 $ 2,679,367 $ 640,445
Total managed and non-managed assets
$ 3,203,934 $ 3,319,812

(1) Non-managed assets represent those for which WM&T does not have investment discretion.

~~The table above provides information regarding AUM by WM&T. This table demonstrates that as~~As of June 30, ~~2019:~~
~~•     Approximately~~2020 and December 31, 2019, approximately 82% and 81%, respectively, of AUM ~~are~~were actively managed.
~~•     Corporate retirement plan accounts consist primarily of participant directed assets.~~
~~•     The amount of custody and safekeeping accounts is insignificant, and~~
• The majority of managed assets are in investment advisory, personal trust and agency accounts. Company retirement plan accounts primarily consist of participant-directed assets and the amount of custody and safekeeping accounts are insignificant.

June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

Interest bearing deposits
$ 129,561 $ 95,387
US Treasury and government agency obligations
56,083 47,574
State, county and municipal obligations
134,268 140,372
Money market mutual funds
4,461 7,670
Equity mutual funds
603,308 580,199
Other mutual funds - fixed, balanced, and municipal
307,068 302,400
Other notes and bonds
175,014 142,123
Common and preferred stocks
949,410 844,004
Real estate mortgages
342 361
Real estate
50,001 51,124
Other miscellaneous assets (1)
75,778 74,848

Total managed assets
$ 2,485,294 $ 2,286,062
75
Table of Contents
Managed Trust Assets under Management by Class of Investment:
Managed Trust Assets by Class of Investment

(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Interest bearing deposits
$ 132,316 $ 145,710
US Treasury and government agency obligations
38,023 46,950
State, county and municipal obligations
132,344 136,575
Money market mutual funds
10,219 7,511
Equity mutual funds
612,419 654,569
Other mutual funds - fixed, balanced, and municipal
376,187 339,296
Other notes and bonds
179,439 182,940
Common and preferred stocks
993,485 1,037,695
Real estate mortgages
322 332
Real estate
51,935 51,059
Other miscellaneous assets (1)
87,729 76,730

Total managed assets
$ 2,614,418 $ 2,679,367

(1) Includes client directed instruments including rights, warrants, annuities, insurance policies, unit investment trusts, and oil and gas rights.

64

~~Table of Contents~~
~~The table above presents data regarding WM&T managed assets by class of investment.~~ Managed assets are invested in instruments for which market values can be readily determined, the majority of which are sensitive to market ~~fluctuations. This table demonstrates that as~~fluctuations and consist of ~~June 30, 2019:~~
•
~~The composition of managed assets is divided approximately 62%~~approximately 61% in equities and 39% in ~~equities and 38% in fixed income securities, and this composition is relatively consistent from period to period, and~~
•
~~WM&T has no proprietary mutual funds.~~
Fiduciary and Related Trust Services Income

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(In thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

Investment advisory accounts
$ 2,246 $ 2,070 $ 4,377 $ 4,149
Personal trust accounts
1,894 1,864 3,698 3,782
Personal individual retirement accounts
931 869 1,821 1,742
Corporate retirement accounts
316 361 643 740
Foundation and endowment accounts
140 134 273 285
Custody and safekeeping accounts
30 30 61 86
Brokerage and insurance services
13 7 38 30
Other
92 9 190 30

Total WM&T services
$ 5,662 $ 5,344 $ 11,101 $ 10,844
The table above provides information regarding fee income earned by Bancorp’s WM&T department. It demonstrates that WM&T fee revenue is earned most significantly from personal trust and investment advisory accounts. Fees are based on AUM and tailored for individual accounts and/or relationships. WM&T uses a fee structure that is tailored based on account type and other factors. For example, fee structures are in place for investment management, irrevocable trusts, revocable trusts, individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”), and accounts holding only fixed income securities. ~~There are also fee structures for estate settlements, which are non-recurring,~~This composition is relatively consistent from period to period and retirement plan services which typically consist of a one-time conversion fee with recurring AUM fees to follow. All fees are based on the market value of each account and are tiered based on account size, with larger relationships paying a lower percentage of AUM in fees. Fees are agreed upon at the time the account is opened and these and any subsequent revisions are communicated in writing to the customer. Fees earned are not performance based nor are they based on investment strategy or transactions.WM&T has no proprietary mutual funds.

Additional ~~sources~~Sources of ~~non-interest income~~Non-interest income:

Deposit service charges, which consist of non-sufficient funds charges and to a lesser extent, other activity based charges, decreased ~~$111 thousand,~~$460,000, or ~~7.7%~~37%, and ~~$275 thousand,~~$355,000, or ~~9.6%~~15%, ~~respectively,~~for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020, as compared with the same periods of 2019. Deposit service charge income is heavily driven by customer behavior and transaction volume, which can fluctuate from period to period. Consistent with the industry, Bancorp has experienced a steady decline in fees earned on overdrawn checking accounts over the last several years. This decline was significantly exacerbated for Bancorp and the industry during the second quarter of 2020, with significant declines in transaction volume and paper check presentments. Stimulus checks, extensions of tax payment due dates, more lucrative unemployment compensation, diminished pandemic spend and PPP funding have all impacted consumer behavior. While Bancorp experienced a notable increase in deposit service charge income during June compared to May, Management is not able to predict when, this revenue stream will return to pre-pandemic levels.
Debit and credit card income consists of interchange income, ancillary fees and incentives received from card processors. Debit and credit card revenue decreased $105,000, or 5%, and increased $131,000, or 3%, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, as compared with the same periods ~~in 2018. Service charge income~~of 2019. The decline for the three-month period is ~~driven by~~reflective of decreased transaction volume related to the pandemic, as the full effects of state-wide shut downs implemented toward the end of the first quarter in the markets in which ~~can fluctuate from period~~Bancorp operates were experienced. Interchange income, which lagged significantly in April and May, did show significant improvement in June. In addition to ~~period. Both the quarterly and year-to-date decreases are consistent with~~ the decline in ~~fees earned on overdrawn checking accounts. While management expects this source~~volume, interchange income has also been impacted by the type of ~~revenue to slowly decline due to anticipated changes~~spending (i.e. in ~~customer behavior, including reduced check volume, and ongoing regulatory restrictions, the decline is anticipated to be less significant than what was experienced~~person card signature spending versus other forms of card use). The 3% increase in ~~the first half of 2019.~~
~~Debit and credit card~~ revenue ~~increased $479 thousand, or 28.4%, and $715 thousand, or 22.4%,~~ for the respective three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, as compared with the same periods in 2018. The increases in both the three and six month comparisons reflected increased volume resulting from continuedsix-month period is attributed to overall growth in the customer base. Volume, which is dependent on customer behavior and new accounts, is expected to continue to increase. Credit card interchange income increased $184 thousand, or 52.17%, and debit card interchange and ancillary fees increased $295 thousand or 22.0%, inbase over the second quarter of 2019, as compared with the same period in 2018. Second quarter 2019 debit card revenue included a non-recurring fee of $176 thousand from its card processor for reaching activity incentive thresholds. For the first six months of 2019, credit card interchange income increased $328 thousand, or 48.8%, and debit card interchange and ancillary fees increased $387 thousand or 15.3%, as compared with the same period in 2018.past 12 months.

Treasury management fees primarily ~~consists~~consist of fees earned for cash management services provided to commercial customers. ~~This~~While the pandemic has slowed business spending/activity and international trade, this category ~~has been~~continues to be a consistent, growing source of revenue for Bancorp ~~including increases in the second quarter of 2019 of $89 thousand~~and increased $47,000, or ~~8.0%~~4%, and ~~$199 thousand,~~$174,000, or ~~9.2%~~7%, for the ~~first~~three and six ~~months of 2019,~~month periods ending June 30, 2020, as compared with the same periods of 2019. Bancorp’s Treasury Management department was able to overcome the significant decline in ~~2018.~~pandemic related transaction volume during the second quarter of 2020 with new product sales and expansion of its customer base (partially attributable to the PPP). The demand for Bancorp’s treasury products has increased during the pandemic, as these products allow customers to operate more efficiently in a decentralized environment. Bancorp ~~continues to expect growth in~~anticipates this income category ~~in 2019~~will continue to increase based ~~upon an expanding~~on continued customer base ~~as more existing customers take advantage~~growth and the expanding suite of ~~these services.~~services offered within the treasury management platform.

65
76
Table of Contents

Mortgage banking income primarily includes gains on sales of mortgage ~~loans.~~loans and loan servicing income offset by MSR amortization. Bancorp’s mortgage banking department originates residential mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary market, primarily to ~~the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”).~~FNMA. Interest rates on the mortgage loans sold ~~to FNMA~~ are locked with the borrower and investor prior to closing the loans, thus Bancorp bears no interest rate risk related to loans sold. ~~The department~~Bancorp offers conventional, ~~Veterans Administration (“VA”)~~VA and ~~Federal Housing Authority (“FHA”)~~FHA financing for purchases and refinances, as well as programs for first-time ~~home buyers.~~homebuyers. Interest rates on mortgage loans directly ~~impact~~influence the volume of business transacted by the ~~mortgage banking~~mortgage-banking department. Mortgage banking revenue increased ~~$50 thousand,~~$862,000, or ~~6.7%~~113%, ~~while decreasing $44 thousand,~~and $1.3 million, or ~~3.3%~~104%, for the ~~respective~~ three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 as compared with the same periods ~~in 2018. Transaction volume increased in the second quarter~~ of 2019, as ~~declining mortgage~~sustained low long-term rates ~~resulted in increased~~have incentivized refinancing activity. Including the gain on sale, Bancorp ~~anticipates refinancing activity~~sold $97 million loans during the first six months of 2020 compared to ~~continue~~$37 million for the same period in 2019. The current pipeline of mortgage loans remains strong compared to ~~increase into~~prior year, however volume could slow, as underlying issues with the ~~third quarter provided mortgage rates continue~~pandemic develop and the pool of potential clients who have yet to ~~decline.~~refinance shrinks.

Net investment product sales commissions and fees decreased $33 thousand, or 8.3%, and $81 thousand, or 10.1%, respectively, for the quarterly and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, as compared with the same periods in 2018. The decreases correspondare generated primarily ~~to overall brokerage volume, as market volatility has somewhat discouraged investment activity in 2019. Brokerage commissions and fees earned consist primarily of~~on stock, bond and mutual fund sales, as well as wrap fees on brokerage accounts. Wrap fees ~~are~~represent charges for investment programs that bundle together a suite of services, such as brokerage, advisory, research and management and are based on a percentage of assets. Bancorp deploys its ~~brokers~~financial advisors primarily through its branch network via an arrangement with a third party broker-dealer, while larger managed accounts are serviced inby Bancorp’s WM&T segment. Net investment product sales commissions and fees increased $27,000, or 7%, and $137,000, or 19%, for the ~~Bank’s WM&T department.~~three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020, as compared with the same periods of 2019, as market volatility during most of the current year has led to increased client trading activity.

~~Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)~~BOLI assets represent the cash surrender value of life insurance policies on certain key employees who have provided consent for Bancorp to be the beneficiary offor a portion of such policies. The related change in cash surrender value and any death benefits received under the policies are recorded as non-interest income. This income serves to offset the cost of various employee benefits. ~~Income related to~~ BOLI income of $176,000 and $355,000 was recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, representing nominal changes as compared with the same periods of 2019.
Other non-interest income decreased ~~$7 thousand,~~$29,000 or ~~3.7%~~5%, and ~~$16 thousand,~~$255,000, or ~~4.2%~~23%, ~~respectively,~~ for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared with the same ~~time~~ periods ~~in 2018, as a result~~ of ~~lower crediting rates on investments.~~
~~Other non-interest income increased $43 thousand, or 8.5%,~~2019. The decline for the ~~second quarter of 2019, as compared with the same~~six-month period ~~in 2018, and $226 thousand, or 28.8%,~~comparison is attributed to a $126,000 incentive for ~~the first six months of 2019, as compared with the same period~~a banking center re-location received in ~~2018. In~~ the first quarter of 2019 ~~Bancorp recognized income~~and a period over period decline in swap fees collected.
77
Table of $126 thousand related to incentive received to relocate a banking center location and recorded income of $130 thousand in the second quarter of 2019 related to a historic tax-credit investment tax distribution. The impact of King on non-interest income has been and is expected to continue to be nominal in 2019.Contents
Non-interest Expenses

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Compensation
$ 11,763 $ 12,715 $ (952 ) (7
)%
$ 23,996 $ 24,516 $ (520 ) (2
)%
Employee benefits
2,871 2,807 64 2 6,038 5,362 676 13
Net occupancy and equipment
2,089 1,967 122 6 3,970 3,816 154 4
Technology and communication
1,947 1,848 99 5 3,960 3,621 339 9
Debit and credit card processing
603 631 (28 ) (4 ) 1,259 1,218 41 3
Marketing and business development
465 903 (438 ) (49 ) 1,025 1,528 (503 ) (33 )
Postage, printing, and supplies
442 410 32 8 883 816 67 8
Legal and professional
628 1,523 (895 ) (59 ) 1,251 2,057 (806 ) (39 )
FDIC insurance
330 248 82 33 459 486 (27 ) (6 )
Amortization of investments in tax credit partnerships
53 52 1 2 89 104 (15 ) (14 )
Capital and deposit based taxes
1,225 967 258 27 2,255 1,871 384 21
Credit loss expense for off-balance sheet exposures
1,475 — 1,475 — 1,850 — 1,850 —
Other
993 1,382 (389 ) (28 ) 1,799 2,670 (871 ) (33 )
Total non-interest expenses
$ 24,884 $ 25,453 $ (569 ) (2
)%
$ 48,834 $ 48,065 $ 769 2
%

~~Non-interest~~Total non-interest expenses decreased $569,000, or 2%, and increased $769,000, or 2%, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same periods of 2019. Compensation and employee benefits comprised 58.8% and 61.5% of Bancorp’s non-interest expenses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2020, compared to 61.0% and 62.2% for the same periods of 2019.

Compensation, which includes salaries, incentives, bonuses and stock based compensation, ~~increased $1.0 million,~~decreased $952,000, or ~~8.6%~~7%, and ~~$1.8 million,~~$520,000, or ~~8.1%~~2%, respectively, for the quarterly and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, as compared with the same periods in 2018. Non-recurring severance and employee retention expenses resulting from the King acquisition totaled $437 thousand for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019. Personnel additions related to Bancorp’s growth, including the King acquisition drove the remainder of the increase. At June 30, 2019, Bancorp had 615 full-time equivalent employees including 28 employees added from the King acquisition,2020, as compared with ~~581~~the same periods of 2019. The decline for the three-month period ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was attributed to recording approximately $757,000 of additional deferred salary expense associated with the origination of PPP loans, the offsetting entry for which is deferred loan fees and amortize over the term of the respective loans. This deferred salary expense was partially offset by $194,000 of incentives paid in relation to the operational on boarding of the program. Further, $437,000 of non-recurring severance and employee retention expenses associated with the 2019 acquisition was recorded in the second quarter of 2019. The six-month decrease is attributed to the items noted above in addition to accruing bonus-related expenses at lower levels in 2020 as compared to 2019, the latter of which was elevated due to record performance. Net full time equivalent employees totaled 620 at June 30, ~~2018.~~2020, 615 at December 31, 2019 and 615 at June 30, 2019.

Employee benefits consists of all ~~personnel related~~personnel-related expense not included in compensation, with the most significant items ~~being~~representing health insurance, payroll taxes and employee retirement plan contributions. Employee benefits increased ~~$396 thousand,~~$64,000 or ~~15.8%~~2%, and ~~$405 thousand,~~$676,000, or ~~7.9%~~13%, ~~respectively~~ for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, as compared with the same periods ~~in 2018. Increased 401K match contributions,~~of 2019. The increase for both periods was attributable to higher health insurance claims ~~paid by~~activity and additional 401(k) matching contributions. These fluctuations were attributed to the ~~Company, and higher employee recruiting costs resulted~~overall increase in ~~the increases. King acquisition related one-time employee benefit expenses totaled $57 thousand for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019.~~full time equivalent employees.
66

~~Table of Contents~~

Net occupancy and equipment ~~expense increased $165 thousand, or 9.1%,~~expenses primarily include depreciation, rent, property taxes, utilities and $205 thousand, or 5.6%, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, as compared with the same periods in 2018. Bancorp added five branch locations in the King acquisition, which impacted this category beginning in May 2019, adding $80 thousand of additional expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019. Bancorp expect to divest of three acquired branch locations in Louisville during the third quarter of 2019 due to their proximity to existing Bancorp branches. This category primarily includes rent, depreciation, and maintenance, variances for which were not individually significant.maintenance. Costs of capital asset additions flow through the statement of income over the lives of the assets in the form of depreciation expense.
~~Technology and communications expense~~ Net occupancy increased ~~$163 thousand,~~$122,000, or ~~9.7%~~6%, and ~~$306,~~$154,000, or ~~9.2%~~4%, ~~respectively,~~ for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, as compared with the same periods ~~in 2018 due largely to increases in computer infrastructure upgrades~~of 2019. Bancorp added three branch locations associated with the May 2019 acquisition and ~~maintenance costs. These~~opened one additional branch location during the third quarter of 2019.
Technology and communication expenses include ~~ongoing~~ computer software amortization, equipment depreciation, debit and credit card processing expenses and expenditures related to investments in technology needed to maintain and improve the quality of customer delivery channels, information security and internal resources. ~~King related one-time technology~~Technology expense increased $99,000, or 5%, and ~~communication expenses totaled $104 thousand~~$339,000, or 9%, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019.~~    2020 as compared with the same periods of 2019 consistent with expanding customer-facing software and system functionality, as well as increased licensing/maintenance expense. Non-recurring technology expenses associated with the 2019 acquisition totaled $104,000 for the three and six month periods of the prior year.
78
Table of Contents

Bancorp outsources processing for debit and commercial credit card operations, which generate significant revenue for the Company. These expenses ~~increase as~~fluctuate consistent with transaction ~~volume increases, offsetting a portion of corresponding revenue growth.~~volumes. Debit and credit card processing expense ~~increased $52 thousand,~~decreased $28,000, or ~~9.0%~~4%, and ~~$73 thousand,~~increased $41,000, or ~~6.4%~~3%, for the three ~~month~~ and ~~six month~~six-month periods ended June 30, ~~2019, respectively, as~~2020 compared with the same periods of 2019. While the six-month period increase is attributed to growth in ~~2018, as a result of a growing customer base~~respective client bases, the three-month period decrease is tied to the reduction in consumer spending relating to the pandemic and ~~increased transaction volume.~~correlates with the revenue fluctuation.

Marketing and business development expenses include all costs associated with promoting Bancorp, community ~~investment,~~support, retaining customers and acquiring new business. Marketing and business development expenses ~~increased $98 thousand,~~decreased $438,000, or ~~12.2%~~49%, ~~in the second quarter of 2019, as compared with the second quarter of 2018. Marketing~~ and ~~business development expenses increased $77 thousand,~~$503,000, or ~~5.3%~~33%, for the three and six ~~months ended~~month periods ending June 30, 2020, as compared to the same periods of 2019. The ~~2019 increases were largely due to increased community support expenses, which can fluctuate between periods due to the nature and timing~~sharp declines correspond with less physical customer interaction as a result of the pandemic, which has led to less travel and entertainment expense ~~but is expected~~in addition to ~~trend to historical annual levels over the remainder of 2019.~~lower advertising expense.

Postage, printing and supplies ~~expenses~~expense increased ~~$10 thousand,~~$32,000, or ~~2.5%~~8%, and ~~$25 thousand,~~$67,000, or ~~3.2%~~8%, infor the ~~respective~~ three and ~~six month~~six-month periods ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, as compared with the same ~~time periods in 2018, primarily due~~period of 2019, attributed to banking center and customer expansion over the ~~King acquisition.~~past 12 months.

Legal and professional fees ~~increased $1.0 million to $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2019 from $504 thousand in the second quarter of 2018. Legal~~decreased $895,000, or 59%, and professional fees increased $1.1 million to $2.1 million for the first half of 2019 from $997 thousand for the first six months of 2018. One-time costs associated with the King acquisition totaled nearly $900 thousand$806,000, or 39%, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020, compared to the same periods of 2019. ~~Additional~~One-time costs associated with ~~consulting engagements also contributed to~~a prior year acquisition totaled nearly $900,000 for the ~~period increases.~~three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019.

FDIC insurance ~~expense~~increased $82,000, or 33%, and decreased $27,000, or 6%, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the same periods of 2019. The fluctuation for the three-month period is reflective of balance sheet growth. The six-month period decline was ~~flat~~attributed to the last portion of the small institution credits from 2019 being used in the first quarter ~~over quarter and year over year. The assessment is calculated by~~of 2020. As a result of the national FDIC Reserve Ratio reaching 1.38% in 2019, the FDIC released credits to small institutions (less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets). For this reason, Bancorp recorded no FDIC insurance expense for the third and ~~any fluctuation in expense is directly related to changes in Bancorp’s balance sheet.~~
~~Amortization/impairment of investments in tax credit partnerships was flat in the second quarter~~fourth quarters of 2019, ~~as compared with~~and incurred only a portion of the ~~second quarter of 2018, while increasing slightly year-to-date as compared with the same time period in 2018. Bancorp did not record any~~assessed expense in the first quarter of ~~2018.~~ 2020, as these credits were depleted.
Tax credit partnerships generate federal income tax credits, and for each of Bancorp’s investments in tax credit partnerships, the tax benefit, ~~compared with~~net of related expenses, results in a positive effect on net income. Amounts of credits and corresponding expenses can vary widely depending upon timing and magnitude of the investments. ~~See~~Amortization expense associated with these investments saw nominal fluctuations for the ~~Income Taxes section below for details on amortization~~three and ~~income tax impact for these credits.~~six-month periods ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the same periods of 2019.

~~Other non-interest expenses~~Capital and deposit based taxes increased ~~$304 thousand,~~$258,000, or ~~31.1%~~27%, and ~~$737 thousand,~~$384,000, or ~~41.8%~~21%, ~~respectively,~~ for the three and six month periods ended June 30, ~~2019, as~~2020 compared ~~with~~to the same periods in ~~2018.~~2019 consistent with overall balance sheet growth.
In connection with the adoption of ASC 326, Bancorp analyzed its unused lines of credit and recorded credit loss expense for off balance sheet exposures totaling $375,000 and $1.5 million during the first and second quarters of 2020. The ~~quarterly~~increase related to changes in the mix of unused lines, mainly C&I and ~~year-to-date increases were~~underlying CECL model factors. No such expense was incurred during the first six months of 2019.
Other non-interest expenses decreased $389,000, or 28%, and $871,000, or 33%, for the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2020, as compared to the same periods of 2019. The second quarter of 2019 included elevated losses including a bank robbery. In addition, a bank-owned property was sold during the first quarter of 2020 that resulted in a gain recorded as an offset to non-interest expense.
79
Table of Contents
Income Tax Expense
A comparison of income tax expense and ETR follows:

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(dollars in thousands)

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

2020

2019

$ Change

% Change

Income before income tax expense
$ 15,716 $ 17,573 $ (1,857 ) (11
)%
$ 31,198 $ 35,053 $ (3,855 ) (11
)%
Income tax expense
2,348 1,030 1,318 128 4,598 2,869 1,729 60
Effective tax rate
14.9 % 5.9 % 14.7 % 8.2 %
Fluctuations in the ETR are primarily attributed to the following:

●
~~Quarterly~~The ETR at June 30, 2020 includes one-half of the anticipated full year impact of a large historic tax credit project scheduled to be placed in service later in 2020.

o●
~~Director~~The stock based compensation ~~increased $88 thousand.~~component of the ETR fluctuates consistent with the level of SAR exercise activity, with lower activity experienced in 2020.

o●
~~Rewards expense tied~~In March 2019, the Kentucky Legislature passed HB354 requiring financial institutions to ~~Bancorp’s growing credit card program increased $87 thousand.~~transition from a capital based franchise tax to the Kentucky corporate income tax beginning in 2021. Historically, the franchise tax, a component of non-interest expenses, was assessed at 1.1% of net capital and has averaged $2.5 million annually over the prior two year-end periods. The Kentucky corporate income tax will be assessed at 5% of Kentucky taxable income and will be included as a component of current and deferred state income tax expense. Associated with this change, predominantly during the first quarter of 2019, Bancorp established a Kentucky state DTA related to existing temporary differences estimated to reverse after the effective date of the law change. Bancorp recorded a corresponding state tax benefit, net of federal tax impact of $1.3 million, or approximately $0.06 per diluted share for 2019. While this is positive in the short-term, Bancorp anticipates an unfavorable impact of approximately $200,000 per year beginning in 2021.

o●
~~Core deposit intangible amortization increased $30 thousand as~~In April 2019, the Kentucky Legislature passed HB458 allowing entities filing a ~~result~~combined Kentucky income return to share certain tax attributed, including net operating loss carryforwards. The combined filing, beginning in 2021, will allow Bancorp’s Holding Company net operating loss carryforwards to offset against net revenue generated by the Bank up to 50% of the ~~King acquisition~~Bank’s Kentucky taxable income and reduce Bancorp’s tax liability. Bancorp recorded a state tax benefit, net of federal tax impact of $2.4 million, predominantly in the second quarter of 2019, or approximately $0.11 per diluted share for 2019.

The CARES Act includes several significant provisions for corporations including increasing the amount of deductible interest under section 163(j), allowing companies to carryback certain net operating losses, and increasing the amount of net operating loss that corporations can use to offset income. These changes did not have a significant impact on Bancorp’s income taxes.
Bancorp invests in certain partnerships that yield federal income tax credits. Taken as a whole, the tax benefit of these investments exceeds amortization expense, resulting in a positive impact on net income. The timing and magnitude of these transactions may vary widely from period to period.
67
80
Table of Contents

●
~~Year-to-date~~
o
~~Director compensation increased $221 thousand.~~
o
~~Rewards expense tied~~Financial Condition – June 30, 2020 Compared to ~~Bancorp’s growing credit card program increased $140 thousand.~~
o
~~Expense related to bad debt collection increased $80 thousand.~~
o
~~Fraud related losses increased $76 thousand~~
o
~~Gain on sales of other real estate decreased $45 thousand~~
o
~~Core deposit intangible amortization increased $28 thousand as a result of the King acquisition.~~
December 31, 2019

~~Income Taxes~~
Bancorp recorded income tax expense of $1.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019, compared with $3.2 million and $6.2 million for the same periods in 2018. The effective rate for the corresponding three and six month periods in 2019 were 5.9% and 8.2%, respectively, and 18.9% and 18.7%, respectively, for 2018 The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2018 to 2019 related primarily to two Kentucky state tax law changes.
In March 2019, Kentucky State legislation was enacted requiring financial institutions to transition from a bank franchise tax to the Kentucky corporate income tax beginning in 2021. In April 2019, an additional Kentucky tax law change was enacted allowing banks and their holding companies to be combined together for Kentucky tax return filings also beginning in 2021. The combined filing will allow Bancorp’s Holding Company net operating losses to offset against net revenue generated by the Bank and reduce Bancorp’s tax liability. Bancorp recorded significant tax benefits associated with these changes in the first and second quarters of 2019. During the first six months of 2019, Bancorp recognized a state deferred tax asset and corresponding state income tax benefit of $3.8 million, or approximately $0.16 per diluted share. See the income taxes footnote for more detail.
~~Commitments~~
As detailed in the Commitments footnote, Bancorp uses a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
Other commitments discussed in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, have not materially changed since that report was filed, relative to qualitative and quantitative disclosures of fixed and determinable contractual obligations.
68

~~Table of Contents~~
~~Financial Condition~~
~~Balance Sheet~~Overview

Total assets increased ~~$160.9~~$610 million, or 16%, to ~~$3.5~~$4.3 billion ~~as of~~at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, from ~~$3.3 million~~$3.7 billion at December 31, ~~2018. Bancorp acquired assets totaling approximately $192~~2019. The significant 2020 balance sheet expansion was directly attributable to the second quarter PPP, which drove a $619 million ~~on May 1, 2019~~increase in ~~connection with the King acquisition.~~loans. In ~~the first six months of 2019 increases in loans, premises and equipment, and other assets were offset by decreases~~addition, declines in cash and cash equivalents were offset by increases in AFS debt securities, accrued interest receivable and ~~available for sale securities. Gross~~other assets. The six months ended June 30, 2020 included significantly higher ACL on loans resulting from the adoption of ASC 326 and additional provisioning.
Total liabilities increased ~~$215.7~~$596 million, or ~~8.5%~~18%, ~~including $160.5~~with a $593 million increase in ~~loans acquired from King. Strong loan production~~deposits driven by the PPP. Increases in ~~the second quarter~~SSUAR and ~~first six months of 2019 contributed to non-acquisition, or legacy, loan growth of $51.6~~other liabilities were offset by a $19 million decline in FHLB advances, as matured advances were not replaced.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $25 million, or ~~2.0%~~10%, ending at $224 million at June 30, 2020, while the average balance for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $82.9~~2020 compared to the same period in 2019 has increased $97 million, or ~~41.7%, as excess~~75%. Bancorp has maintained higher levels of liquidity ~~was used~~in 2020 attributable to ~~fund loan growth~~the PPP and ~~the King acquisition.~~current economic uncertainty.
AFS Debt Securities ~~available for sale decreased $13.4~~
AFS debt securities increased $15 million, or ~~3.1%~~3%, over the first six months of 2019, as maturing security cash flows were not reinvested but held in the form of short-term liquidity. This decline was offset somewhat by market value improvement in the portfolio with net unrealized gainsto $485 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020. In the current declining interest rate market values have increased, driving an $11 million increase in the market value of ~~$1.7~~the AFS portfolio at June 30, 2020
Goodwill
At June 30, 2020, Bancorp had $13 million asin goodwill recorded on its balance sheet. Events that may trigger goodwill impairment include deterioration in economic conditions, increased competition, loss of key personnel, and regulatory action. More specifically, a sustained decline in stock price could be considered a triggering event. Similar to other financial institutions, the COVID-19 economic crisis caused volatility to Bancorp’s stock price. Management compared ~~with net unrealized losses~~the fair value of ~~$6.7~~the commercial banking segment to the carrying value recorded on the balance sheet and other factors, and concluded its goodwill was not impaired. Bancorp’s stock has traded above book value for the entire first and second quarters of 2020.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Other assets increased $11 million, or 22%, to $62 million at June 30, 2020, from $51 million at December 31, ~~2018. Premises and equipment~~2019. In addition, other liabilities increased ~~$20.3~~$14 million, or ~~45.4%~~22%, ~~primarily~~to $74 million at June 30, 2020, from $61 million at December 31, 2019. The increase in both of the ~~result establishing~~categories was largely attributed to changes market value changes of interest rate swap transactions maintained for certain loan customers. Bancorp enters into these interest rate swap transactions with borrowers who desire to hedge exposure to rising interest rates, while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap, with substantially matching terms, with another approved independent counterparty. These are undesignated derivative instruments and are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value via both an asset and a ~~right of use lease asset upon adopting ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases~~ inrelated liability as Bancorp has an agreement with the ~~first quarter of 2019~~borrower (the asset) and the ~~addition~~counterparty (the liability). Because of ~~five King branches. Other assets increased $17.3 million or 36.8% as~~matching terms of offsetting contracts and collateral provisions mitigating any non-performance risk, changes in fair value have an offsetting effect on the related asset and liability. For this reason, the market value changes we have seen since the end of last year stemming from the declining interest rate environment have resulted in increases to both the asset and liability associated with these transactions. For additional information, see the footnote titled “Derivative Financial Instruments.”
As of June 30, ~~2019, as compared~~2020, Bancorp did not have any impairment with ~~December 31, 2018 due primarily~~respect to its other intangible assets (MSRs and CDIs) or other long-lived assets. It is possible that the ~~recognition~~lingering effects of ~~$12.1 million~~COVID-19 could cause the occurrence of what management would deem to be a triggering event that could cause Bancorp to perform an intangible asset impairment test and result in ~~goodwill related to the King acquisition.~~
Total liabilities increased $138.0 million or 4.7% to $3.1 billion as of June 30, 2019, from $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2018. Liabilities assumed in the King acquisition totaled $176.6 million. Total deposits increased $89.1 million, or 3.2%, as $125.5 million in deposits assumed from the King transaction offset expected seasonal decreases in Bancorp’s non-interest bearing deposits, and interest bearing demand deposit accounts. For the six month period ending June 30, 2019, non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $66.6 million, or 9.4%, while interest bearing deposits increased $22.5 million, or 1.1%. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“SSUAR”) decreased $2.3 million, or 6.3%, due to normal cyclical activity, and the continuation of customers migrating to higher-yielding, non-collateralized deposits. Federal funds purchased increased $1.8 million, or 17.2%, period to period, as Bancorp uses short-term lines of credit to manage its overall liquidity position. Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances increased $36.1 million, or 74.9%, as Bancorp retained the fixed rate long term advances that were held at King in connection with overall balance sheet funding. Other liabilities increased $13.1 million, or 28.0%, largely due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, ~~Leases~~~~, in the first quarter of 2019.~~an impairment charge being recorded.

69
81
Table of Contents

~~Loan Portfolio Composition~~Loans

Composition of loans, net of deferred fees and costs, by primary loan portfolio class follows:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Commercial and industrial
$ 860,085 $ 833,524
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land(1)
222,632 225,050
Undeveloped land
35,169 30,092

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
696,421 588,610
Owner occupied commercial
452,719 426,373
1-4 family residential
338,957 276,017
Home equity - first lien
46,012 49,500
Home equity - junior lien
67,948 70,947
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
1,602,057 1,411,447

Consumer
43,937 48,058
Total loans(2)
$ 2,763,880 $ 2,548,171
(In thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

$ Change

% Change

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 815,464 $ 746,283 $ 69,181 9 %
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
472,457 474,329 (1,872 ) 0 %
Total commercial real estate
1,287,921 1,220,612 67,309 6 %

Commercial and industrial - term
510,384 457,298 53,086 12 %
Commercial and industrial - term - PPP
630,082 - 630,082 100 %
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
254,096 381,502 (127,406 ) -33 %
Total commercial and industrial
1,394,562 838,800 555,762 66 %

Residential real estate - owner occupied
215,891 217,606 (1,715 ) -1 %
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
139,121 134,995 4,126 3 %
Total residential real estate
355,012 352,601 2,411 1 %

Construction and land development
255,447 255,816 (369 ) 0 %
Home equity lines of credit
103,672 103,854 (182 ) 0 %
Consumer
43,758 47,467 (3,709 ) -8 %
Leases
14,843 16,003 (1,160 ) -7 %
Credits cards - commercial
8,862 9,863 (1,001 ) -10 %
Total loans (1)
$ 3,464,077 $ 2,845,016 $ 619,061 22 %

(1)
~~Consists~~ Total loans are presented inclusive of ~~land acquired for development by the borrower, but for which no development has yet taken place~~.
~~(2)~~
~~Unaccreted discounts include accretable and non-accretable~~premiums, discounts, and ~~primarily relate to Bancorp's TBOC~~net loan origination fees and ~~King acquisitions in 2012,and 2019, respectively.~~costs
Total loans increased $619 million, or 22%, primarily attributable to the PPP loan portfolio. Total loans (excluding PPP loans) contracted $11 million during the first six months of 2020, with a $67 million increase in CRE loans offset by a $74 million decline in C&I loans. The C&I decline was predominantly attributable to customers who received PPP funds. Despite flat line of credit usage for the first quarter of 2020, usage declined significantly to 39% at June 30, 2020 compared to 47% at December 31, 2019.
As of June 30, 2020, PPP loans of $630 million ($647 million gross of unamortized deferred fees), were outstanding. PPP borrowers are eligible for forgiveness from the SBA for the portion of funding received utilized for job retention and certain other expenses, such as payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities during the 24-week period beginning with the date of the loan. With a significant portion of these loans potentially eligible for full forgiveness there is high likelihood of early pay off prior to maturity (predominantly 24 months).
In accordance with Section 4013 of the CARES Act and in response to requests from borrowers who experienced business or personal cash flow interruptions related to the pandemic, Bancorp executed a payment deferral program. Depending on the demonstrated need of the customer, Bancorp deferred either the full loan payment or the principal only portion of respective loan payments for 90 or 180 days for some borrowers directly impacted by the pandemic.  As of June 30, 2020, Bancorp executed 1,100 of full payment deferrals (predominantly three months) on outstanding loan balances of $502 million - representing 18% of the loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans). Approximately 85% of the total deferrals processed (in terms of dollars) occurred in the month of April, with the subsequent pace slowing significantly. Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals were not classified as TDRs and not included in non-performing loan statistics. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter and through the end of July, a significant portion of the deferred loan portfolio returned to full paying status. As of July 31, 2020, Bancorp estimates that 10% of the total loan portfolio (excluding PPP loans) remained in full payment deferment status. Bancorp is monitoring loan modification expirations daily and anticipates the potential for more customers to return to full payment status over the next two months as their initial deferral period ends.
82
Table of Contents
While all industries have and may continue to experience adverse impacts as a result of COVID-19, Bancorp had exposures (on balance sheet loans and commitments to lend) in the following pandemic sensitive industries as of June 30, 2020:
Industry Segments (dollars in millions)

Outstanding

% of Total Loans *

Shopping Centers
$ 58 2.0 %
Lodging / Hotels
62 2.2 %
Nursing homes / Residential Care
50 1.8 %
Recreation / Entertainment
56 2.0 %
Restaurants / Bars
30 1.0 %
Travel Related
24 0.8 %
* - Total loans exclude PPP loans.
Bancorp anticipates that a significant portion of the Bank’s borrowers in the above industry segments will continue to endure significant economic distress, as long as the current COVID-19 related economic conditions persist. Among other things, this could cause them to draw on their existing lines of credit and/or affect their ability to repay existing indebtedness. These developments, together with economic conditions generally, are also expected to impact the CRE portfolio, particularly with respect to real estate with exposure to these industries, and the value of certain collateral.
Bancorp’s credit exposure is diversified with secured and unsecured loans to individuals and businesses. No specific industry concentration exceeds 10% of loans outstanding. While Bancorp has a diversified loan portfolio, a customer’s ability to honor contracts is somewhat dependent upon the economic stability and/or industry in which that customer does business. Loans outstanding and related unfunded commitments are primarily concentrated within Bancorp’s current market areas, which encompass the Louisville, Indianapolis and Cincinnati MSAs.

Bancorp occasionally enters into loan participation agreements with other banks to diversify credit risk. For certain participation loans sold, Bancorp has retained effective control of the loans, typically by restricting the participating institutions from pledging or selling their ownership share of the loan without permission from Bancorp. GAAP requires the participated portion of these loans to be recorded as secured borrowings. These participated loans are included in the ~~commercial~~C&I, C&D and ~~industrial and real estate~~CRE mortgage loan portfolio segments with a corresponding liability recorded in other liabilities. At June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the total participated ~~portions~~portion of loans of this nature ~~were $9.9~~totaled $9 million and ~~$10.5~~$8 million, respectively.

~~Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses~~
An allowance has been established to provide for probable losses on loans that may not be fully repaid. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans are typically charged off when management deems them uncollectible and after underlying collateral has been liquidated; however, collection efforts continue and future recoveries may occur. Periodically, loans are partially charged off to the net realizable value based upon evaluation of related underlying collateral, including Bancorp’s proclivity for resolution.
The allowance methodology is driven by risk ratings, historical losses, and qualitative factors. The level of the June 30, 2019 allowance reflected a number of factors, including credit quality metrics which were generally consistent with those experienced in the preceding 12 months, and expansion of the historical look-back period from 32 quarters to 36 quarters. This expansion of the historical period was applied to all classes and segments of the portfolio. Expansion of the look-back period for historical loss rates used in the quantitative allocation caused review of the overall methodology for qualitative factors to ensure we were appropriately capturing risk not addressed in the quantitative historical loss rate. Management believes extension of the look-back period is appropriate to ensure capture of the impact of a full economic cycle and more accurately represents the current level of risk inherent in the loan portfolio. Key indicators of loan quality continued to trend at levels consistent with prior periods, however management recognizes that due to the cyclical nature of the lending business, these trends will likely normalize over the long term. Additional information regarding Bancorp’s methodology for evaluating the adequacy of the allowance can be read in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
70

~~Table of Contents~~
As of June 30, 2019 the allowance was $26.4 million, a $882 thousand increase from the December 31, 2018 balance of $25.5 million. For the comparative periods, the allowance as a percent of year-to-date average loans was 1.02% and 1.01%, respectively. The allowance as a percent of period end loans, as of each period end, 0.96% and 1.00%, respectively. The allowance balance is reflective of continued strong credit metrics and net recoveries of $282 thousand for the first six months of 2019. As of June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, the allowance remained adequate to cover potential losses in the loan portfolio, in management’s opinion.
Non-performing Loans and Non-performing Assets

Information summarizing non-performing loans and assets ~~including non-accrual loans~~ follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

(dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Non-accrual loans~~(1)~~
$ 3,030 $ 2,611 $ 14,262 $ 11,494
Troubled debt restructurings
37 42 45 34
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
861 745 48 535

Total non-performing loans
3,928 3,398 14,355 12,063

Other real estate owned
563 1,018 493 493

Total non-performing assets
$ 4,491 $ 4,416 $ 14,848 $ 12,556

Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans
0.14 % 0.13 %
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
0.13 % 0.13 %
Non-performing loans to total loans
0.41 % 0.42 %
Non-performing assets to total assets
0.34 % 0.34 %

~~(1) No TDRs previously accruing~~Non-performing loans to total loans were ~~transferred~~ ~~to non-accrual during the three~~ ~~and six~~ ~~month periods ending~~ 0.41% at June 30,~~, 2019. No TDRs were on non-accrual as of~~ ~~June 30~~~~, 2019 or~~ 2020 compared to 0.21% at March 31, 2020 and 0.42% at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Non-performing loans to total loans (excluding PPP loans) were 0.51% at June 30, 2020.

In total, non-performing assets as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were comprised of 2631 loans, ranging in ~~amount~~individual amounts from ~~$1 thousand~~$300 to ~~$528 thousand,~~$10 million, two accruing ~~TDRs,~~TDR loans and foreclosed real estate held for sale. Foreclosed real estate held at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 included a ~~1-4 family~~ residential real estate property and a ~~commercial real estate~~CRE property.
83
Table of Contents
Non-performing loans increased $2 million to $14 million at June 30, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019. During the first quarter of 2020 a large non-accrual C&I relationship totaling $8 million paid off due to sale of the business. During the second quarter of 2020, a large CRE relationship was placed on non-accrual status and allocated a $2 million specific reserve within the ACL on loans. The borrower did not receive PPP funds, the loan was current at the time of non-accrual classification, and no payments related to the loan have been deferred. Other activity in non-performing loans for the first six months of 2020 was driven by additions and removals of smaller credits to and from non-performing loan status.
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of non-performing loans and the amortized cost basis of loans on non-accrual status for which there was no related ACL losses of June 30, 2020:
(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 213
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
1,663
Total commercial real estate
1,876

Commercial and industrial - term
9
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
—
Total commercial and industrial
9

Residential real estate - owner occupied
306
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
225
Total residential real estate
531

Construction and land development
—
Home equity lines of credit
—
Consumer
—
Leases
—
Credit cards - commercial
—
Total non-accrual loans
$ 2,416
The following table presents the recorded investment in non-performing loans by portfolio class as of December 31, 2019:
(in thousands)

December 31, 2019

Commercial and industrial
$ 8,202
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
—
Undeveloped land
—

Real estate mortgage:

Commercial investment
740
Owner occupied commercial
2,278
1-4 family residential
123
Home equity - first lien
—
Home equity - junior lien
151
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
3,292
Consumer
—
Total non-accrual loans
$ 11,494
84
Table of Contents
Delinquent Loans
Delinquent loans (consisting of all loans 30 days or more past due) totaled $6 million at June 30, 2020 compared to $13 million at March 31, 2020 and $15 million at December 31, 2019. Delinquent loans total loans were 0.17%, 0.44% and 0.53% at June 30, 2020, March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Delinquent loans to total loans (excluding PPP loans) were 0.21% at June 30, 2020.
Allowance for Credit Losses of Loans
The ACL is a valuation allowance for loans estimated at each balance sheet date in accordance with GAAP. When Bancorp deems all or a portion of a loan to be uncollectible, the appropriate amount is written off and the ACL is reduced by the same amount. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ACL when received. See the footnote titled “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for discussion of Bancorp’s ACL methodology on loans. Allocations of the ACL may be made for specific loans, but the entire ACL on loans is available for any loan that, in Bancorp’s judgment, should be charged-off.

The following table sets forth the ~~major classifications~~ACL by category of ~~non-accrual loans:~~loan:

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

Commercial and industrial
$ 96 $ 192
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land
— 318
Undeveloped land
— 474

Real estate mortgage

Commercial investment
305 138
Owner occupied commercial
1,444 586
1-4 family residential
715 760
Home equity - first lien
— —
Home equity - junior lien
470 143
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage
2,934 1,627
Consumer
— —

Total non-accrual loans
$ 3,030 $ 2,611

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

(in thousands)

Allocated
Allowance

% of Loan
Portfolio (1)

ACL to Total
Loans (1)

Allocated
Allowance

% of Loan
Portfolio

ACL to Total
Loans

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
$ 18,839 28 % 2.31 % $ 5,235 25 % 0.70 %
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
6,706 17 % 1.42 % 3,327 17 % 0.70 %
Total commercial real estate
25,545 45 % 1.98 % 8,562 42 % 0.70 %

Commercial and industrial - term (1)
7,339 17 % 1.44 % 6,782 16 % 1.48 %
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
3,242 9 % 1.28 % 5,657 13 % 1.48 %
Total commercial and industrial
10,581 26 % 1.38 % 12,439 29 % 1.48 %

Residential real estate - owner occupied
2,848 8 % 1.32 % 1,527 8 % 0.70 %
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
1,594 5 % 1.15 % 947 5 % 0.70 %
Total residential real estate
4,442 13 % 1.25 % 2,474 13 % 0.70 %

Construction and land development
5,608 9 % 2.20 % 2,105 9 % 0.82 %
Home equity lines of credit
832 4 % 0.80 % 728 4 % 0.70 %
Consumer
362 2 % 0.83 % 100 2 % 0.21 %
Leases
223 1 % 1.50 % 237 1 % 1.48 %
Credit cards - commercial
115 0 % 1.30 % 146 0 % 1.48 %
Total net loan (charge-offs) recoveries
$ 47,708 100 % 1.68 % $ 26,791 100 % 0.94 %
(1)
Excludes the PPP loan portfolio at June 30, 2020, which was not reserved for based on the 100% SBA guarantee.
Upon adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, Bancorp recorded an increase of $8.2 million to the ACL on loans and a corresponding decrease to retained earnings, net of the DTA impact. In addition, non-accretable yield marks of $1.6 million related to formerly classified PCI loans were re-classed between the amortized cost basis of loans and corresponding ACL. The adjustment upon adoption of ASC 326 raised the ACL on loans balance to $37 million on January 1, 2020. In addition to the CECL adoption, the ACL on the first and second quarters of 2020 was significantly impacted by national unemployment forecast adjustments within the CECL model, changes in the loan mix and the addition of a large specific reserve during the second quarter of 2020.

71
85
Table of Contents

Bancorp measures expected credit losses of financial assets on a collective (pool) basis, when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics. Depending on the nature of the pool of financial assets with similar risk characteristics, Bancorp has measured its portfolio classes as follows:
Loan Portfolio Segment
ACL Methodology
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Commercial and industrial - term
Static pool
Commercial and industrial - line of credit
Static pool
Residential real estate - owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied
Discounted cash flow
Construction and land development
Static pool
Home equity lines of credit
Static pool
Consumer
Static pool
Leases
Static pool
Credit cards - commercial
Static pool
The static pool methodology is utilized for the loan portfolio segments that typically have shorter durations. For each of these loan segments, Bancorp applies an expected loss ratio based on historical losses adjusted as appropriate for qualitative factors. Qualitative loss factors are based on management's judgment of company, market, industry or business specific data, changes in underlying loan composition of specific portfolios, trends relating to credit quality, delinquency, non-performing and adversely rated loans, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions.
When developing the ACL CECL model for loan pools utilizing the DCF method, Bancorp utilized regression analysis of historical internal and peer data to identify a suitable loss driver to utilize when modeling lifetime probability of default and loss given default. Such regression analysis was used to measure how the expected probability of default and loss given default would react to changes in forecasted levels of the loss driver. Based on this regression analysis, management determined that the forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate best correlated to Bancorp’s historical losses and elected to use this rate as the primary loss driver to be consistently applied across all applicable loan segments over a reasonable and supportable forecast period.
Upon adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, management determined that four quarters represented a reasonable and supportable national unemployment forecast period with reversion back to Bancorp’s historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. This resulted in an $8.2 million initial increase in the ACL on loans with the offset to retained earnings.
Subsequent to January 1, 2020, based on the economic crisis caused by COVID-19 and measures taken to protect public health such as stay-at-home orders and mandatory closures of businesses, economic activity halted significantly and job losses surged. As such, national unemployment has fluctuated widely over the last several months as follows:

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

National Unemployment Rate
11.10 % 13.30 % 14.70 % 4.40 % 3.50 % 3.60 % 3.50 %
As of March 31, 2020, based on the evolving pandemic, Bancorp elected to forecast for only one quarter of national unemployment (versus the four quarters used as of January 1, 2020) and modified its forecast to reflect a significant increase in unemployment (utilizing the highest unemployment rate in Bancorp’s observed history) reverting back to the long-term average in the third quarter of 2020, with the loss driver remaining significantly worse compared to recent trends. The impact of the increased national unemployment forecast was muted by an adjustment in qualitative factors attributed to the massive federal stimulus programs enacted at the end of the first quarter in response to the pandemic. The forecasted increase in national unemployment coupled with the qualitative factor adjustments resulted in approximately $4.2 million of the total provision expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
During the second quarter, for the first time during 2020, the FRB released a forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate for the 12 months ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022 as follows:

2020

2021

2022

Upper end of range
14.0 % 12.0 % 8.0 %
Median
9.3 % 6.5 % 5.5 %
Lower end of range
7.0 % 4.5 % 4.0 %
86
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2020, based on the above and the continuation of the economic crisis, Bancorp elected to forecast for one quarter of national unemployment utilizing actual June unemployment then stepping down to a blended rate based on the above FRB median forecast over the next four quarters before reverting back to the long-term average. Similar to the first quarter of 2020, the impact of the increased unemployment forecast was muted by an adjustment in qualitative factors attributed to the massive federal stimulus programs that have been enacted. The forecasted increase in unemployment coupled with the qualitative factor adjustments resulted in approximately $4.6 million of the total provision expense recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and $8.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.
Outstanding loans (excluding PPP loans) increased $92 million during the first three months of 2020 and contracted $103 million during the second quarter of 2020, as outstanding C&I lines of credit were reduced by $114 million. The overall net change in the loan mix contributed to $1.3 million of additional provision expense for the three months ended March 31, 2020. During the second quarter of 2020, the loan contraction (mainly C&I lines of credit) led to a $1.0 million reduction in the required ACL on loans.
The pandemic has had a material impact on Bancorp’s ACL on loans calculations for both March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020. While Bancorp has not yet experienced any credit quality issues such as charge-offs related to the pandemic, the ACL calculation for loans and resulting provision were significantly impacted by changes in forecasted economic conditions. Should the forecast for economic conditions worsen, Bancorp could experience further increases in its required ACL and record additional provision expense. While the execution of Bancorp’s payment deferral program has assisted the ratio of past due loans to total loans at March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020, it is possible that asset quality could worsen at future measurement periods if the effects of the pandemic are prolonged.
In connection with the adoption of ASC 326, Bancorp analyzed its unused lines of credit and recorded credit loss expense for off-balance sheet exposures (non-interest expense) totaling $375,000 and $1.5 million during the first and second quarters of 2020. The second quarter increase directly correlates to the increased availability due to C&I line of credit pay downs. At June 30, 2020, approximately $6 million was accrued within other liabilities related to off balance sheet exposures.
During the three months ended June 30, 2020, a large CRE relationship was placed on non-accrual status and received a $2 million specific reserve allocation within the ACL on loans. The borrower did not receive PPP funds, the loan was current at the time of non-accrual classification, and no payments related to the loan have been deferred.
Deposits
(in thousands)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Non-interest bearing demand deposits
$ 1,205,253 $ 810,475

Interest bearing deposits:

Interest bearing demand
1,147,357 979,595
Savings
196,655 169,622
Money market
761,256 742,029

Time deposits of $250 thousand or more
76,954 81,412
Other time deposits(1)
339,681 350,805
Total time deposits
416,635 432,217

Total interest bearing deposits
2,521,903 2,323,463

Total deposits
$ 3,727,156 $ 3,133,938
(1)     Includes $30 million in brokered deposits as of both June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
Total deposits increased $593 million, or 19%, from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020 with non-interest bearing deposits representing $395 million of the increase. Both ending and average deposit balances finished at record levels as of June 30, 2020, as a result of the second quarter PPP and deferred tax payments. Commercial customers who were awarded PPP funding have generally been slow in deploying the funds held on deposit at the Bank. Bancorp has relied on this along with excess cash on hand to fund the PPP loan portfolio. In addition, some maturing certificates of deposit are not being renewed in the current low interest rate environment.
87
Table of Contents
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
SSUARs are collateralized by securities and are treated as financings; accordingly, the securities involved with the agreements are recorded as assets and are held by a safekeeping agent and the obligations to repurchase the securities are reflected as liabilities. All securities underlying the agreements are under the Bank’s control.
SSUARs totaled $43 million and $32 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The majority of SSUARs are indexed to immediately repricing indices such as the FFTR. The increase in SSUAR is attributed to the trend of customers maintaining higher balances in general during the first half of 2020, presumably a result of current economic uncertainty.
FHLB Advances
In connection with the May 2019 acquisition, Bancorp assumed $43 million FHLB term advances and chose to retain them on balance sheet based upon the then-favorable rate and terms in the overall execution of Bancorp’s asset liability management strategy. Over the past 12 months, these advances have not been replaced as they have matured. In addition, during the second quarter of 2020, Bancorp elected to pay down $10 million of advances without penalty based on the favorable interest rate environment experienced at the time.
Liquidity

The role of liquidity management is to ensure funds are available to meet depositors’ withdrawal and borrowers’ credit demands while at the same time maximizing profitability. This is accomplished by balancing changes in demand for funds with changes in supply of ~~such~~those funds. Liquidity is provided by short-term ~~liquid~~ assets that can be converted to cash, ~~investment~~AFS debt securities, ~~available for sale,~~ various lines of credit available to Bancorp, and the ability to attract funds from external sources, principally deposits. Management believes it has the ability to increase deposits at any time by offering rates slightly higher than market rate.
Bancorp’s Asset/Liability Committee is comprised of senior management and has direct oversight responsibility for Bancorp’s liquidity position and profile. A combination of reports provided to management details internal liquidity metrics, composition and level of the liquid asset portfolio, timing differences in short-term cash flow obligations, and exposure to contingent draws on Bancorp’s liquidity.
As of June 30 2020, Bancorp had not experienced any significant funding issues related to the PPP or the pandemic in general. A significant portion of the funds borrowed have remained in the form of commercial deposits and have generally been slow to outflow. In addition, the deferment of tax payment deadlines and federal stimulus checks have also contributed to higher than normal deposit balances. If a liquidity issue arose, Bancorp would utilize overnight funds from the FHLB (the lowest costing source), in which Bancorp has available credit in excess of $800 million.

Bancorp’s most liquid assets are comprised of cash and due from banks, ~~available for sale marketable investment securities, federal funds sold~~FFS and AFS debt securities. FFS and interest bearing ~~due from accounts with banks. Federal funds sold~~deposits totaled $178 million and ~~interest bearing due from bank accounts totaled $64.8~~$203 million at June 30, ~~2019. These investments~~2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. FFS normally have overnight maturities ~~and~~while interest-bearing deposits in banks are accessible on demand. These investments are used for general daily liquidity purposes.
~~Available for sale securities totaled $423.6~~ The fair value of the AFS debt security portfolio was $485 million and $471 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, ~~with $132.1~~respectively. The portfolio includes maturities of approximately $75 million ~~in securities~~ expected ~~to mature~~ over the next 12 months. Combined with ~~federal funds sold~~FFS and interest bearing ~~due~~deposits from ~~bank accounts, these~~banks, AFS debt securities offer substantial resources to meet either ~~new~~ loan ~~demand~~growth or reductions in Bancorp’s deposit funding base. Bancorp pledges portions of ~~the~~its investment securities portfolio to secure public ~~fund deposits,~~funds, cash balances of certain WM&T accounts and SSUAR. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, total investment securities pledged for these purposes comprised ~~79.4%~~81% of the ~~available for sale investment~~AFS debt securities portfolio, leaving approximately ~~$87.1~~$91 million of unpledged AFS debt securities.

Bancorp has a ~~significant~~large base of ~~non-maturity~~core customer deposits, defined as ~~demand, savings, money market deposit accounts and~~ time deposits less than or equal to $250,000, ~~(excluding~~demand, savings, money market deposit accounts and excluding brokered ~~deposits).~~deposits. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, such deposits totaled ~~$2.8~~$3.6 billion and represented ~~96.5%~~97% of Bancorp’s total deposits, as compared with ~~$2.7~~$3.0 billion, or ~~97.0%~~96% of total deposits at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Because these core deposits are less volatile and are often tied to other products of Bancorp through long lasting relationships, they do not ~~put significant~~place undue pressure on liquidity. ~~As market conditions continue to improve, these~~However, many of Bancorp’s individual depositors are currently maintaining historically high balances. These excess balances may ~~decrease, placing pressure on~~be more sensitive to market rates, with potential decreases possibly straining Bancorp’s liquidity position. Bancorp began adding liquidity to the balance sheet in 2018 sheet through targeted certificate of deposit marketing campaigns. The campaigns generated over $100 million in certificate of deposit growth in 2018.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, Bancorp ~~had~~held brokered deposits totaling $30 million.
88
Table of ~~$29.8 million.~~
Contents

Included in total deposit balances at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 is ~~$157.4~~$234 million of public funds ~~deposits~~ generally comprised of accounts from local government agencies and public school districts in the markets in which Bancorp ~~operates within. As a result of property tax collections in the latter part of each year~~operates. Bancorp consider these accounts provide seasonal excess balances that originate with tax payments and decline leading into the subsequent tax season. While this excess liquidity is maintained in low-yielding short-term investments and consequently negatively impacts net interest margin, it has a positive impact on net interest income.to be long-term relationships.

~~Other sources~~Bancorp is a member of ~~funds available to meet daily needs include~~ the ~~sales~~FHLB of ~~SSUAR.~~Cincinnati. As a member of the FHLB, ~~of Cincinnati,~~ Bancorp has access to credit products ~~offered by~~of the FHLB. Bancorp views these borrowings as a potential low cost alternative to brokered deposits. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, available credit from the FHLB totaled ~~$484.0~~$806 million ~~as compared with $537.0~~and $599 million, asrespectively. The increase in available credit over the first six months of ~~December 31, 2018.~~2020 is due to pledging a portion of the PPP portfolio, increasing our collateral-based borrowing capacity. See the footnote titled “FHLB Advances” for additional detail. Additionally, Bancorp had unsecured available ~~federal funds purchased~~FFP lines with correspondent banks totaling ~~$105.0~~$80 million at ~~both~~ June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 and $105 million December 31, ~~2018.~~  2019. This decrease is the result of closing a relationship with a correspondent bank that was deemed unnecessary as a result of changes in their fee structure.
Over the normal course of business, Bancorp enters into certain forms of off-balance sheet transactions, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. These transactions are managed through Bancorp’s various risk management processes. Management considers both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions in its evaluation of Bancorp’s liquidity.

Bancorp’s principal source of cash revenue is dividends paid to it as the sole shareholder of the Bank. As discussed in the footnote titled “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” as of January 1st of any year, the Bank may pay dividends in an amount equal to the Bank’s net income of the prior two years less any dividends paid for the same two years. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank ~~could~~may pay upan amount equal to ~~$49.7~~$53 million in dividends to Bancorp without regulatory approval subject to ~~the~~ ongoing capital requirements of the Bank.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Cash flow is provided primarily through financing activities of Bancorp, which include raising deposits and borrowing funds from institutional sources such as advances from FHLB and FFP, as well as scheduled loan repayments. These funds are primarily used to facilitate investment activities of Bancorp, which include making loans and purchasing securities for the investment portfolio. Another important source of cash is net income of the Bank from operating activities. For further detail regarding the sources and uses of cash, see the “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows” in Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements.
Commitments
In the normal course of business, Bancorp is party to activities that contain credit, market and operational risk that are not reflected in whole or in part in Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements. Such activities include traditional off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments, commitments under operating leases and long-term debt.
Bancorp provides customers with off-balance sheet credit support through loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Unused loan commitments increased $66 million as of June 30, 2020 compared to December 31, 2019 consistent with the pay down activity seen for C&I lines of credit and significantly lower line utilization rates. The ~~Bank paid the Holding Company a $28 million dividend in April,~~C&I line utilization rate fell from 43% at December 31, 2019 to ~~consummate the acquisition of King and this did not significantly hamper the Bank’s ability to pay future dividends.~~29% at June 30, 2020.

~~Capital Resources~~Commitments to extend credit are an agreement to lend to a customer as long as collateral is available as agreed upon and there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Bancorp uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional guarantees as for on-balance sheet instruments. Bancorp evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, securities, equipment and real estate. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, our maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Bancorp had accrued $6 million and $350,000, respectively, in other liabilities for its estimate of inherent risks related to unfunded credit commitments. In accordance with the adoption of ASC 326 on January 1, 2020, Bancorp’s ACL on off-balance sheet exposures was increased from $350,000 at December 31, 2019 to $3.9 million ($2.6 million net of the DTA) with the offset recorded to retained earnings on a tax-effected basis, with no impact on earnings. Also, based on periodic analysis of its unused lines of credit, Bancorp recorded $1.9 million in additional off-balance sheet exposure expense for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The increase is related to underlying CECL model factors and a significant decline in line of credit usage related to the pandemic.
89
Table of Contents
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Bancorp to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party beneficiary. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support commercial transactions. Standby letters of credit generally have maturities of one to two years.
In addition to owned banking facilities, Bancorp has entered into long-term leasing arrangements for certain branch facilities. Bancorp also has required future payments for a non-qualified defined benefit retirement plan, long-term debt and the maturity of time deposits.
See the footnote titled “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” for additional detail.
Capital
At June 30, 2020, stockholders’ equity totaled ~~$389.4~~$420 million, an increase of ~~$22.9~~$14 million, or ~~6.2%~~3%, since December 31, ~~2018. See~~2019, as 2020 net income of $26.6 million and the ~~Consolidated Statement of Changes~~positive change in ~~Stockholders’ Equity for further detail of changes in equity since 2018. One component of equity is accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) which, for Bancorp,~~AOCI were offset by CECL related adjustments and dividends declared. AOCI consists of net unrealized gains or losses on AFS debt securities ~~available for sale~~ and hedging instruments, as well as a minimum pension liability, each net of income taxes. ~~Accumulated other comprehensive income~~AOCI was ~~$1.1~~$9 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 compared with ~~a loss of $5.1 million on~~$677,000 at December 31, ~~2018. The~~2019 with the fluctuation ~~in other comprehensive income is reflective of~~stemming from the changing interest rate environment ~~during 2019~~ and corresponding ~~impact upon the~~ valuation of ~~Bancorp’s available for sale~~the AFS debt securities portfolio. See the “Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity”for further detail of changes in equity.
In May 2019, Bancorp’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to 1 million shares, or approximately 4% of Bancorp’s total common shares outstanding at the time. The plan, which will expire in May 2021 unless otherwise extended or completed at an earlier date, does not obligate Bancorp to repurchase any specific dollar amount or number of shares prior to the plan’s expiration. During 2019, Bancorp repurchased 259,000 shares at a weighted average price per share of $35.46. In addition to a $28 million dividend to Bancorp during the second quarter of 2019 to consummate the 2019 acquisition, the Bank paid up an $18.5 million dividend during the third quarter of 2019 to support the share repurchase program. Based on recent economic developments and the increased importance of capital preservation, no shares were repurchased in 2020 and Management does not intend to resume repurchasing in the near-term. Approximately 741,000 shares remain eligible for repurchase under the current buy-back plan.
Bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks are required by regulators to meet risk-based capital standards. These standards, or ratios, measure the relationship of capital to a combination of balance sheet and off-balance sheet risks. The value of both balance sheet and off-balance sheet items are adjusted to reflect credit risks. See the footnote titled “Regulatory Matters” for additional detail regarding regulatory capital requirements, as well as capital ratios of Bancorp and the Bank. The Bank exceeds regulatory capital ratios required to be well capitalized. Regulatory framework does not define well capitalized for holding companies. Management considers the effects of growth on capital ratios as it contemplates plans for expansion.

72
90
Table of Contents

The following table sets forth consolidated Bancorp’s and the Bank’s risk based capital ratios:

June 30,

December 31,

2019

2018

Total risk-based capital(1)

Consolidated
12.67
%
13.91
%
Bank
12.45 13.56

Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital(1)

Consolidated
11.82 13.00
Bank
11.60 12.65

Tier 1 risk-based capital(1)

Consolidated
11.82 13.00
Bank
11.60 12.65

Leverage(2)

Consolidated
10.91 11.33
Bank
10.70 11.02
~~(1)~~
~~Under banking agencies~~’ risk-based capital guidelines, assets and credit-equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet exposures are assigned to broad risk categories. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is multiplied by the associated risk weight of the category. W~~eighted values are added together, resulting in~~~~Bancorp's total risk-weighted assets. These ratios are computed in relation to average assets.~~
~~(2)~~
~~Ratio is computed in relation to average assets~~.

June 30,

December 31,

2020

2019

Total risk-based capital(1)

Consolidated
13.50
%
12.85
%
Bank
13.07 12.20

Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital(1)

Consolidated
12.39 12.02
Bank
11.95 11.37

Tier 1 risk-based capital(1)

Consolidated
12.39 12.02
Bank
11.95 11.37

Leverage(2)

Consolidated
9.50 10.60
Bank
9.15 10.67

(1)     Under banking agencies’ risk-based capital guidelines, assets and credit-equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet exposures are assigned to broad risk categories. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is multiplied by the associated risk weight of the category. Weighted values are added together, resulting in Bancorp's total risk-weighted assets. These ratios are computed in relation to average assets.
(2)     Ratio is computed in relation to average assets.
As noted in the table above, Bancorp and the Bank ~~are subject~~experienced a decline in leverage ratio from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020. The leverage ratio, which consists of tier-1 capital ~~regulations in accordance with Basel III,~~divided by adjusted quarterly average assets, was negatively impacted due to the outsized balance sheet growth attributed to PPP participation. This will normalize over time, as administered by banking regulators. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Bancorp’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Holding Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of Bancorp’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators regarding components, risk weightings and other factors.PPP loans pay-off early or ultimately mature.

Banking regulators have categorized the Bank as well-capitalized. ~~For prompt corrective action, the~~The regulations in accordance with Basel III define “well capitalized” as a 6.5% ~~common equity tier~~Common Equity Tier 1 ~~risk-based capital~~Risk-Based Capital ratio, an 8.0% ~~tier~~Tier 1 ~~risk-based capital~~Risk-Based Capital ratio, a 10.0% ~~total risk-based capital~~Total Risk-Based Capital ratio and a 5.0% ~~leverage~~Tier 1 Leverage ratio.
Additionally, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, Bancorp and Bank must hold a capital conservation buffer composed of ~~common equity tier~~Common Equity Tier 1 ~~risk-based capital~~Risk-Based Capital above their minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer ~~phased in from 2016 to 2019 on~~set forth by the ~~following schedule: 0.625% effective January 1, 2016; 1.25% effective January 1, 2017; 1.875% effective January 1, 2018;~~Basel III regulatory capital framework was 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the minimum risk based capital ratio requirements at June 30, 2020 and ~~a fully phased in~~December 31, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of ~~2.5%~~economic stress and requires increased capital levels for the purpose of capital distributions and other payments. Failure to meet the full amount of the buffer will result in restrictions on ~~January 1, 2019.~~Bancorp’s ability to make capital distributions, including dividend payments and stock repurchases, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, Bancorp’s and SYB’s risk based capital exceeded the required capital conservation buffer.

Bancorp continues to exceed the regulatory requirements for ~~total risk-based capital, common equity tier~~Total Risk Based Capital, Common Equity Tier I ~~risk-based capital, tier~~Risk Based Capital, Tier I ~~risk-based capital~~Risk Based Capital and ~~leverage capital.~~Tier I Leverage. Bancorp and the Bank intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the “well-capitalized” requirements as defined by the FRB and the FDIC, in addition to the Capital Conservation Buffer. There are no conditions or events since June 30, 2020 that management believes have changed Bancorp’s well-capitalized status.
As permitted by the interim final rule issued on March 27, 2020 by the federal banking regulatory agencies, Bancorp elected the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital ~~conservation buffer.~~related to the adoption of ASC 326 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,” or CECL, which was effective January 1, 2020. The initial impact of adoption of ASC 326, as well as 25% of the quarterly increases in the ACL subsequent to adoption of ASC 326 (collectively the “transition adjustments”) were declared to be delayed for two years. After two years, the cumulative amount of the transition adjustments will become fixed and will be phased out of the regulatory capital calculations evenly over a three-year period, with 75% recognized in year three, 50% recognized in year four and 25% recognized in year five. After five years, the temporary regulatory capital benefits will be fully reversed. Had Bancorp not elected to defer the regulatory capital impact of CECL, the post ASC 326 adoption capital ratios of Bancorp and the Bank would have exceeded the well-capitalized level.

73
91
Table of Contents

~~Non-GAAP Financial Measures~~
Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following table provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity in accordance with GAAP to tangible stockholders’ equity, a non-GAAP disclosure. Bancorp provides the tangible book value per share, a non-GAAP measure, in addition to those defined by banking regulators, because of its widespread use by investors as a means to evaluate capital adequacy.

~~The following table reconciles Bancorp’s calculation of tangible common equity to amounts reported under GAAP:~~
(In thousands, except per share data)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

(in thousands, except per share data)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Total stockholders' equity - GAAP(a)
$ 389,365 $ 366,500 $ 420,231 $ 406,297
Less: Goodwill
(12,826 ) (682 ) (12,513 ) (12,513 )
Less: Core deposit intangible
(2,461 ) (1,057 ) (2,122 ) (2,285 )
Tangible common equity - Non-GAAP(c)
$ 374,078 $ 364,761 $ 405,596 $ 391,499

Total assets - GAAP(b)
$ 3,463,823 $ 3,302,924 $ 4,334,533 $ 3,724,197
Less: Goodwill
(12,826 ) (682 ) (12,513 ) (12,513 )
Less: Core deposit intangible
(2,461 ) (1,057 ) (2,122 ) (2,285 )
Tangible assets - Non-GAAP(d)
$ 3,448,536 $ 3,301,185 $ 4,319,898 $ 3,709,399

Total stockholders' equity to total assets - GAAP
11.24
%
11.10
%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets - Non-GAAP
10.85 11.05
Total stockholders' equity to total assets - GAAP (a/b)
9.69 % 10.91 %
Tangible common equity to tangible assets - Non-GAAP (c/d)
9.39 % 10.55 %

Total shares outstanding(e)
22,721 22,749 22,667 22,604

Book value per share - GAAP
$ 17.14 $ 16.11
Tangible common equity per share - Non-GAAP
16.46 16.03
Book value per share - GAAP (a/e)
$ 18.54 $ 17.97
Tangible common equity per share - Non-GAAP (c/e)
17.89 17.32

ACL to total non-PPP loans represents the ACL, divided by total loans less PPP loans. Bancorp believes this non-GAAP ratio is important because it provides a comparable ratio after eliminating PPP loans, which are fully guaranteed by the U.S. SBA and have not been allocated for within the ACL.
(in thousands, except per share data)

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Total loans - GAAP (b)
$ 3,464,077 $ 2,845,016
Less: PPP loans
(630,082 ) -
Total non-PPP loans - Non-GAAP (c)
$ 2,833,995 $ 2,845,016

Allowance for credit losses (c)
$ 47,708 $ 26,791

Allowance for credit losses to total loans - GAAP (a/b)
1.38 % 0.94 %
Allowance for credit losses to total loans - Non-GAAP (a/c)
1.68 % 0.94 %
92
Table of Contents
The efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP measure, equals total non-interest expenses divided by the sum of FTE net interest income and non-interest income. The ratio excludes net gains (losses) on sales, calls, and impairment of investment securities, if applicable. In addition to the efficiency ratio, ~~normally presented,~~ Bancorp considers an adjusted efficiency ratio. Bancorp believes ~~excluding~~it is important because it provides a comparable ratio after eliminating the fluctuation in non-interest expenses related to amortization of investments in tax credit partnerships from non-interest expense in this ratio is important because it provides a meaningful comparison to both prior periods, since amortization expense can fluctuate widely between periods depending upon timing of tax credits, and to other companies who do not invest in these partnerships.

Net interest income on a FTE basis includes the additional amount of interest income that would have been earned if investments in certain tax-exempt interest earning assets had been made in assets subject to federal, state and local taxes yielding the same after-tax income.

Three months ended June 30,

Six months ended June 30,

(in thousands, except per share data)

2020

2019

2020

2019

Total non-interest expenses - GAAP (a)
$ 24,884 $ 25,453 $ 48,834 $ 48,065
Less: Amortization of investments in tax credit partnerships
(53 ) (52 ) (89 ) (104 )
Total non-interest expenses - Non-GAAP (c )
$ 24,831 $ 25,401 $ 48,745 $ 47,961

Total net interest income, fully tax equivalent
$ 33,573 $ 30,857 $ 66,066 $ 60,597
Total non-interest income
12,622 12,224 25,158 23,232
Less: Gain/loss on sale of securities
- - - -
Total revenue - GAAP (b)
$ 46,195 $ 43,081 $ 91,224 $ 83,829

Efficiency ratio - GAAP (a/b)
53.87 % 59.08 % 53.53 % 57.34 %
Efficiency ratio - Non-GAAP (c/b)
53.75 % 58.96 % 53.43 % 57.21 %
74
93
Table of Contents

~~The following table reconciles Bancorp’s calculation of adjusted efficiency ratios to the ratio reported under GAAP:~~

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2019

2018

2019

2018

Non-interest expenses
$ 25,464 $ 22,136 $ 48,103 $ 43,163

Net interest income (tax-equivalent)
30,829 28,759 60,542 56,161
Non-interest income
12,263 11,435 23,325 22,344
Total revenue
$ 43,092 $ 40,194 $ 83,867 $ 78,505

Efficiency ratio - GAAP
59.09 % 55.07 % 57.36 % 54.98 %

Three months ended

Six months ended

June 30,

June 30,

2019

2018

2019

2018

Non-interest expenses
$ 25,464 $ 22,136 $ 48,103 $ 43,163
Less: amortization of investments in tax credit partnerships
(52 ) (58 ) (104 ) (58 )
Adjusted non-interest expense
25,412 22,078 47,999 43,105

Net interest income (tax-equivalent)
30,829 28,759 60,542 56,161
Non-interest income
12,263 11,435 23,325 22,344
Total revenue
$ 43,092 $ 40,194 $ 83,867 $ 78,505

Adjusted efficiency ratio - Non-GAAP
58.97 % 54.93 % 57.23 % 54.91 %
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Information required by this item is included in Part I Item 2, ~~“Management’s~~“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 4.      Controls and ~~Procedures.~~Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.’s management, with the participation of its ~~Chief Executive Officer~~CEO and ~~Chief Financial Officer,~~CFO, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s ~~Chief Executive Officer~~CEO and ~~Chief Financial Officer~~CFO concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

75

~~Table of Contents~~
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.      Legal ~~Proceedings.~~Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of operations, Bancorp and the Bank are defendants in various legal proceedings. There is no proceeding pending or, ~~threatened litigation,~~ to the knowledge of management, threatened in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the business or consolidated financial position of Bancorp or the Bank.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
There have been no material changes in Bancorp’s risk factors from those disclosed in Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, with the exception of:
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread have adversely impacted our business and financial results, and the ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has created and continues to create extensive disruptions to the global economy and to the lives of individuals throughout the world. Governments, businesses, and the public are taking unprecedented actions to contain the spread of COVID-19 and to mitigate its effects, including self-quarantines, travel bans, shelter-in-place orders, closures of businesses and schools, fiscal stimulus, and legislation designed to deliver monetary aid and other relief. While the scope, duration, and full effects of COVID-19 continue to evolve and are not fully known, the pandemic and related efforts to contain it have disrupted global economic activity, adversely affected the functioning of financial markets, impacted interest rates, increased economic and market uncertainty, and disrupted trade and supply chains. If these effects continue for a prolonged period, or result in sustained economic stress or recession, many of the risk factors identified in our 2019 Annual Report on Form-10-K could be exacerbated and such effects could have a material adverse impact on us in a number of ways related to credit, collateral, asset valuations, customer demand, funding, operations, interest rate risk, and human capital, as described in more detail below.
Credit Risk – Timely loan repayment and the value of collateral supporting the loans are affected by the strength of our borrower’s business. Concern about the spread of COVID-19 has caused and may continue to cause business shutdowns, limitations on commercial activity and financial transactions, supply chain interruptions, increased unemployment, increased bankruptcies, elevated commercial property vacancy rates, reduced profitability, and overall economic and financial market instability, all of which may cause our customers to be unable to make scheduled loan payments. With regard to unemployment, management utilizes the forecasted Seasonally Adjusted National Civilian Unemployment Rate as its primary loss driver within its ACL model. To the extent the forecast is adjusted upward by the FRB, Bancorp will incur additional provision for credit losses.
94
Table of Contents
If the effects of COVID-19 result in widespread and sustained repayment shortfalls on loans in our portfolio, we could incur significant delinquencies, foreclosures and credit losses, particularly if the available collateral is insufficient to cover our exposure. The future effects of COVID-19 on economic activity could negatively affect the ability of customers to repay their loans, collateral values associated with our existing loans, our ability to maintain loan origination volume, and the future demand for or profitability of our lending and services. Further, in the event of delinquencies, regulatory changes and policies designed to protect borrowers may slow or prevent us from making our business decisions or may result in a delay in our taking certain remediation actions, such as foreclosure. In addition to loans outstanding, we have unfunded commitments to extend credit to customers.
Interest Rate Risk – Our net interest income, lending activities, deposits and profitability could be negatively affected by volatility in interest rates caused by uncertainties stemming from COVID-19. In March 2020, the FRB lowered the FFTR to a range from zero to 0.25 percent, citing concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on markets. A prolonged period of extremely volatile and unstable market conditions could increase our funding costs and negatively affect market risk mitigation strategies. Higher income volatility from changes in interest rates and spreads to benchmark indices could cause a loss of future net interest income. Fluctuations in interest rates will affect both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets and liabilities and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our net income, operating results, or financial condition.
Banking institutions have been planning for the transition away from LIBOR in advance of December 31, 2021, the date that LIBOR is generally expected to cease to exist. It remains unclear, however, whether the cessation of LIBOR will be delayed due to COVID-19 or what form any delay may take, and there are no assurances that there will be a delay. It is also unclear what the duration and severity of COVID-19 will be, and whether this will affect LIBOR transition planning. COVID-19 may also slow regulators’ and others’ efforts to develop and implement alternative reference rates, which could make LIBOR transition planning more difficult, particularly if the cessation of LIBOR is not delayed and alternatives do not develop.
Market Risk – Market disruption, whether or not caused directly by COVID-19, could lead to further declines in Bancorp’s stock price and cash flow projections leading to long-lived asset impairment, such as goodwill. While we stress test for various events, Bancorp’s model may not fully take into account a global pandemic event of COVID-19’s scope. Such risks could also result in other-than-temporary impairments and/or reduce other comprehensive income.
Income from WM&T represents a significant portion of non-interest income. AUM are expressed in terms of market value, and a significant portion of fee income is based upon those values. A large majority of WM&T fees are based on market values, which generally fluctuate with overall capital markets. Volatile market conditions caused by COVID-19 could reduce the value of AUM and/or cause clients to withdraw funds.
Operational Risk – The spread and the threat of the spread of COVID-19 has caused us to modify our business practices and Bancorp may take further actions, as may be required by government authorities, or as we determine, are in the best interests of our employees, customers and business partners. There is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by the virus. We rely on business processes and branch activity that largely depend on people and technology, including access to information technology systems, as well as information, applications, payment systems and other services provided by third parties.
Work-from-home measures introduce additional operational risk, including increased cybersecurity risk. These cyber risks include greater phishing, malware, and other cybersecurity attacks, vulnerability to disruptions of our information technology infrastructure and telecommunications systems for remote operations, increased risk of unauthorized dissemination of confidential information, limited ability to restore the systems in the event of a systems failure or interruption, greater risk of a security breach resulting in destruction or misuse of valuable information, and potential impairment of our ability to perform critical functions, including wiring funds, all of which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability and could seriously disrupt our operations and the operations of any impacted customers.
Consumers affected by COVID-19 may continue to demonstrate subdued behavior in terms of spending after the crisis is over. For example, consumers may decrease discretionary spending on a permanent or long-term basis, certain industries may take longer to recover (particularly those that rely on travel or large gatherings) as consumers may be hesitant to return to full social interaction, and temporary closures of bank branches could result in consumers becoming more comfortable with technology and devaluing face-to-face interaction. Changes to business practices may be necessary to accommodate changing consumer behaviors.
There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect the spread of COVID-19 as a global pandemic may have, and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and subject to change. Bancorp does not yet know the full extent of the impacts on its business, operations or the global economy as a whole. However, the effects could have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and heighten many of its known risks described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
95
Table of Contents
Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table shows information relating to the repurchase of shares of common stock by Bancorp during the three months ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

Total number
of shares
purchased(1)

Average
price paid
per share

Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs

Average
price
paid per
share

Maximum number of
shares that may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs

Apr 1 - April 30
110 $ 34.35 — —
May 1 - May 31
26,260 33.83 26,260 33.83
June 1 - June 30
83,770 34.29 81,078 34.25
Total
110,140 $ 34.18 107,338 34.15 892,662

Total number
of shares
purchased(1)

Average price
paid per
share

Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Average
price paid
per share

Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs

April 1 - April 30
— $ — — $ —
May 1 - May 31
— — — —
June 1 - June 30
1,353 38.27 1,353 38.27

Total
1,353 $ 38.27 1,353 $ — 741,196

~~(1)~~(2)
Activity includes ~~2,802~~1,353 shares of stock withheld to pay taxes due upon exercise of ~~stock appreciation rights~~,SARs and vesting of ~~restricted stock~~,RSUs and ~~vesting of performance stock units~~ PSUs.

Effective May 22, 2019, Bancorp’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of ~~1,000,000~~1 million shares, or approximately 4% of ~~the Company’s~~Bancorp’s total common shares ~~outstanding.~~outstanding at the time. Stock repurchases are expected to be made from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, subject to applicable securities ~~law.~~laws. The plan, which will expire in ~~two years~~May 2021 unless otherwise extended or completed at an earlier date, does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific dollar amount or number of shares prior to the plan’s expiration. Based on recent economic developments and the increased importance of capital preservation, no shares were repurchased in 2020 and Management does not expect to resume repurchasing in the near-term. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Bancorp had ~~892,662~~741,196 shares that could be repurchased under its current share repurchase program.

There were no equity securities of the registrant sold without registration during the quarter covered by this report.

76

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 6.     ~~Exhibits.~~Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:

Exhibit
Number
~~Number~~
Description of exhibit
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101
The following ~~financial statements~~materials from ~~the~~ Stock Yards Bancorp Inc.’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 6, 2019,2020 formatted in Inline Extensible
Business Reporting Language (iXBRL):
~~(1)~~
inline XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets,
~~(2)~~
(ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income,
~~(3)~~
(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,
~~(4)~~
(iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in ~~Stockholders’~~Shareholders’ Equity,
~~(5)~~
(v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
~~(6)~~
and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial ~~Statements~~Statements.
104
The cover page from Stock Yards Bancorp Inc.’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020 formatted in inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.

77
96
Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

STOCK YARDS BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
~~(Registrant)~~
Date: August ~~6 , 2019~~7, 2020
By:
~~By:~~
/s/ James A. Hillebrand
James A. Hillebrand
~~Chief~~CEO (Principal Executive ~~Officer~~Officer)
Date: August ~~6 , 2019~~7, 2020
/s/ T. Clay Stinnett
T. Clay Stinnett, ~~Executive Vice President,~~EVP, Treasurer and
~~Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer~~
CFO (Principal Financial Officer)

78
97

Kentucky		61-1137529
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1040 East Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky		40206
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Title of each class	Trading symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, no par value	SYBT	The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC


Large accelerated filer ☒	Accelerated filer ☐	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐

~~Item~~		~~Page~~
~~part~~Part I – ~~financial information~~Financial Information


Item 1. Financial Statements.		4

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	4

	Consolidated Statements of Income	5

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	6

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	7

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	9

	Footnotes to Consolidated Financial Statements	11

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		5258

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.		7594

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.		7594


~~PART~~Part II – ~~OTHER INFORMATION~~Other Information		94

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.		94

Item1A. Risk Factors.		94

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		96

Item 6. Exhibits.		96


~~Item 1.~~ ~~Legal Proceedings~~		76

~~Item 2.~~ ~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.~~	76

~~Item 6.~~ ~~Exhibits.~~	77

~~SIGNATURES~~Signatures	97

Acronym or Term	Definition	Acronym or Term	Definition	Acronym or Term	Definition
ACH	~~Definition~~Automatic Clearing House	ETR	Effective Tax Rate	NIM	Net Interest Margin (FTE)
AFS	Available for ~~sale~~Sale	~~HELOC~~EVP	~~Home equity line of credit~~Executive Vice President	NPV	Net Present Value
~~Allowance~~APIC	Additional paid-in capital	FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board	Net Interest Spread	Net Interest Spread (FTE)
ACL	Allowance for ~~loan and lease losses~~Credit Losses	~~HTM~~FDIC	~~Held to maturity~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation	NM	Not Meaningful
AOCI	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	FFP	Federal Funds Purchased	OAEM	Other Assets Especially Mentioned
ASC	Accounting Standards Codification	~~King~~FFS	~~King Bancorp, Inc.~~Federal Funds Sold	OCI	Other Comprehensive Income
ASU	Accounting Standards Update	~~KSBT~~FFTR	~~King Bancorp Statutory Trust I~~Federal Funds Target Rate	OREO	Other Real Estate Owned
ATM	Automated Teller Machine	FHA	Federal Housing Authority	PPP	Paycheck Protection Program
AUM	Assets ~~under management~~Under Management	~~LIBOR~~FHC	~~London Interbank Offering Rate~~Financial Holding Company	PV	Present Value
Bancorp / the Company	Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.	~~Loans~~FHLB	~~Loans and leases~~Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati	PCD	Purchased with Credit Deteriorated
Bank / SYB	Stock Yards Bank & Trust ~~Co.~~Company	~~MSA~~FHLMC	~~Metropolitan statistical area~~Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	PCI	Purchased Credit Impaired
BOLI	Bank ~~owned life insurance~~Owned Life Insurance	~~MSR~~FICA	~~Mortgage servicing right~~Federal Insurance Contributions Act	Prime	The Wall Street Journal Prime Interest Rate
~~BPS~~BP	Basis ~~point =~~Point - 1/~~100~~^th100th of one percent	NAFNMA	~~Not applicable~~Federal National Mortgage Association	Provision	Provision for Credit Losses
C&D	Construction and ~~development~~Development	~~OAEM~~FRB	~~Other assets especially mentioned~~Federal Reserve Bank	PSU	Performance Stock Unit
CARES Act	Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act	FTE	Fully Tax Equivalent	ROA	Return on Average Assets
C&I	Commercial and ~~industrial~~Industrial	~~OCI~~GAAP	~~Other comprehensive income~~United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles	ROE	Return on Average Equity
CD	Certificate of Deposit	GLB Act	Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act	RSA	Restricted Stock Award
CDI	Core Deposit Intangible	GNMA	Government National Mortgage Association	RSU	Restricted Stock Unit
CECL	Current Expected Credit ~~Losses~~Loss (ASC-326)	~~OREO~~HB	~~Other real estate owned~~House Bill	SAB	Staff Accounting Bulletin
CEO	Chief Executive Officer	~~OTTI~~HELOC	~~Other than temporarily impaired~~
~~COSO~~	~~Committee~~Home Equity Line of ~~Sponsoring Organizations~~	~~PCI~~	~~Purchased credit impaired~~
~~CRA~~	~~Community Reinvestment Act of 1977~~	~~Provision~~	~~Provision for loan and lease losses~~
~~CRE~~	~~Commercial real estate~~	~~PSU~~	~~Performance stock unit~~
~~Dodd-Frank Act~~	~~Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act~~	~~ROA~~	~~Return on average assets~~
~~EPS~~	~~Earnings per share~~	~~ROE~~	~~Return on average equity~~
~~EVP~~	~~Executive Vice President~~	~~RSA~~	~~Restricted stock award~~
~~FASB~~	~~Financial Accounting Standards Board~~	~~RSU~~	~~Restricted stock unit~~
~~FDIC~~	~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation~~Credit	SAR	Stock ~~appreciate right~~Appreciation Right
~~FHA~~CFO	~~Federal housing Administration~~Chief Financial Officer	ITM	Interactive Teller Machine	SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission
~~FHLB~~COVID-19	~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~Coronavirus Disease - 2019	KBST	King Bancorp Statutory Trust I	SSUAR	Securities ~~sold under agreements~~Sold Under Agreements to ~~repurchase~~Repurchase
~~FHLMC~~CRA	~~Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation~~Community Reinvestment Act	~~TBOC~~KSB	~~THE~~King Bancorp, Inc. and King Southern Bank ~~of Oldham County~~
~~FNMA~~	~~Federal National Mortgage Association~~SBA	Small Business Administration
CRE	Commercial Real Estate	LIBOR	London Interbank Offered Rate	TCE	Tangible ~~common equity~~Common Equity
~~FRB~~Dodd-Frank Act	~~Federal Reserve Bank~~The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act	Loans	Loans and Leases	TDR	Troubled Debt Restructuring
~~GAAP~~DTA	~~U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles~~Deferred Tax Asset	MBS	Mortgage Backed Securities	TPS	Trust Preferred Securities
DTL	Deferred Tax Liability	MSA	Metropolitan Statistical Area	VA	U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
~~GNMA~~DCF	~~Government National~~ Discounted Cash Flow	MSRs	Mortgage ~~Association~~Servicing Rights	WM&T	Wealth Management and Trust
EPS	Earnings Per Share	NASDAQ	The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC

(In thousands, except share data)
	June 30,		December 31,			June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018			2020		2019
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	51,264	$	51,892		$	46,362	$	46,863
Federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks		64,775		147,047			178,032		202,861
Cash and cash equivalents		116,039		198,939
Total cash and cash equivalents							224,394		249,724

Mortgage loans held for sale		3,922		1,675			17,364		8,748
Securities available for sale		423,579		436,995
Available for sale debt securities (amortized cost of $472,797 in 2020 and $469,313 in 2019, respectively							485,249		470,738
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		11,316		10,370			11,284		11,284
Loans and leases		2,763,880		2,548,171
Allowance for loan and lease losses		26,416		25,534
Net loans and leases		2,737,464		2,522,637
Loans							3,464,077		2,845,016
Allowance for credit losses							47,708		26,791
Net loans							3,416,369		2,818,225

Premises and equipment, net		65,069		44,764			56,832		58,618
Bank owned life insurance		32,631		32,273			32,912		32,557
Accrued interest receivable		9,633		8,360			13,535		8,534
Goodwill		12,826		682			12,513		12,513
Core deposit intangible		2,461		1,057			2,122		2,285
Other assets		48,883		45,172			61,959		50,971
Total assets	$	3,463,823	$	3,302,924		$	4,334,533	$	3,724,197

Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	777,652	$	711,023		$	1,205,253	$	810,475
Interest bearing		2,105,801		2,083,333			2,521,903		2,323,463
Total deposits		2,883,453		2,794,356			3,727,156		3,133,938

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		33,809		36,094			42,722		31,895
Federal funds purchased		12,012		10,247			8,401		10,887
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		84,279		48,177			61,432		79,953
Accrued interest payable		1,008		762			471		640
Other liabilities		59,897		46,788			74,120		60,587
Total liabilities		3,074,458		2,936,424			3,914,302		3,317,900

Commitments and contingent liabilities (note 15)		—		—
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Footnote 10)							—		—

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value. Authorized 1,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding		—		—			—		—
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 22,721,027 and 22,749,139 shares in 2019 and 2018, respectively		36,596		36,689
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 22,667,000 and 22,604,000 shares in 2020 and 2019, respectively							36,415		36,207
Additional paid-in capital		37,776		36,797			39,425		35,714
Retained earnings		313,927		298,156			335,575		333,699
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,066		(5,142	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income							8,816		677
Total stockholders’ equity		389,365		366,500			420,231		406,297
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,463,823	$	3,302,924		$	4,334,533	$	3,724,197

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	34,099	$	33,447	$	67,848	$	65,018
Federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks		88		830		619		1,563
Mortgage loans held for sale		125		43		186		80
Securities available for sale:
Taxable		2,136		2,546		4,602		5,114
Tax-exempt		58		130		133		277
Total interest income		36,506		36,996		73,388		72,052
Interest expense:
Deposits		2,607		5,652		6,569		10,718
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		8		28		24		53
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowing		2		64		31		124
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		361		424		790		645
Subordinated debentures		—		26		—		26
Total interest expense		2,978		6,194		7,414		11,566
Net interest income		33,528		30,802		65,974		60,486
Provision for credit losses		5,550		—		11,100		600
Net interest income after provision		27,978		30,802		54,874		59,886
Non-interest income:
Wealth management and trust services		5,726		5,662		11,944		11,101
Deposit service charges		800		1,260		2,083		2,438
Debit and credit card income		2,063		2,168		4,043		3,912
Treasury management fees		1,249		1,202		2,533		2,359
Mortgage banking income		1,622		760		2,468		1,210
Net investment product sales commissions and fees		391		364		857		720
Bank owned life insurance		176		184		355		362
Other		595		624		875		1,130
Total non-interest income		12,622		12,224		25,158		23,232
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation		11,763		12,715		23,996		24,516
Employee benefits		2,871		2,807		6,038		5,362
Net occupancy and equipment		2,089		1,967		3,970		3,816
Technology and communication		1,947		1,848		3,960		3,621
Debit and credit card processing		603		631		1,259		1,218
Marketing and business development		465		903		1,025		1,528
Postage, printing and supplies		442		410		883		816
Legal and professional		628		1,523		1,251		2,057
FDIC insurance		330		248		459		486
Amortization of investments in tax credit partnerships		53		52		89		104
Capital and deposit based taxes		1,225		967		2,255		1,871
Credit loss expense for off-balance sheet exposures		1,475		-		1,850		-
Other		993		1,382		1,799		2,670
Total non-interest expenses		24,884		25,453		48,834		48,065
Income before income tax expense		15,716		17,573		31,198		35,053
Income tax expense		2,348		1,030		4,598		2,869
Net income	$	13,368	$	16,543	$	26,600	$	32,184
Net income per share, basic	$	0.59	$	0.73	$	1.18	$	1.42
Net income per share, diluted	$	0.59	$	0.72	$	1.17	$	1.40
Weighted average outstanding shares:
Basic		22,560		22,689		22,538		22,675
Diluted		22,739		22,949		22,737		22,948

	Three months ended				Six months ended
(In thousands, except per share data)	June 30,				June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Interest income:
Loans and leases	$	33,419	$	29,456	$	64,963	$	56,518
Federal funds sold and interest bearing due from banks		830		163		1,563		431
Mortgage loans held for sale		43		44		80		79
Securities available for sale
Taxable		2,546		2,105		5,114		4,243
Tax-exempt		130		236		277		477
Total interest income		36,968		32,004		71,997		61,748
Interest expense:
Deposits		5,652		2,674		10,718		4,751
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		28		30		53		67
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowing		64		397		124		483
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		424		229		645		464
Subordinated debentures		26		—		26		—
Total interest expense		6,194		3,330		11,566		5,765
Net interest income		30,774		28,674		60,431		55,983
Provision for loan and lease losses		—		1,235		600		1,970
Net interest income after provision		30,774		27,439		59,831		54,013
Non-interest income:
Wealth management and trust services		5,662		5,344		11,101		10,844
Deposit service charges		1,336		1,447		2,583		2,858
Debit and credit card income		2,168		1,689		3,912		3,197
Treasury management fees		1,202		1,113		2,359		2,160
Mortgage banking income		796		746		1,278		1,322
Net investment product sales commissions and fees		364		397		720		801
Bank owned life insurance		184		191		362		378
Other		551		508		1,010		784
Total non-interest income		12,263		11,435		23,325		22,344
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation		12,715		11,703		24,516		22,673
Employee benefits		2,908		2,512		5,550		5,145
Net occupancy and equipment		1,976		1,811		3,834		3,629
Technology and communication		1,848		1,685		3,621		3,315
Debit and credit card processing		631		579		1,218		1,145
Marketing and business development		903		805		1,528		1,451
Postage, printing, and supplies		410		400		816		791
Legal and professional		1,523		504		2,057		997
FDIC insurance		248		238		486		480
Amortization/impairment of investments in tax credit partnerships		52		58		104		58
Capital and deposit based taxes		967		862		1,871		1,714
Other		1,283		979		2,502		1,765
Total non-interest expenses		25,464		22,136		48,103		43,163
Income before income tax expense		17,573		16,738		35,053		33,194
Income tax expense		1,030		3,159		2,869		6,211
Net income	$	16,543	$	13,579	$	32,184	$	26,983
Net income per share, basic	$	0.73	$	0.60	$	1.42	$	1.19
Net income per share, diluted	$	0.72	$	0.59	$	1.40	$	1.17
Weighted average common shares:
Basic		22,689		22,625		22,675		22,601
Diluted		22,949		22,967		22,948		22,959

(In thousands)	2019			2018
Operating activities:
Net income	$	32,184		$	26,983
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan and lease losses		600			1,970
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net		1,679			2,680
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(3,959	)		40
Gain on sales of mortgage loans held for sale		(719	)		(769	)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale		(38,081	)		(37,803	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		36,553			39,483
Bank owned life insurance income		(362	)		(378	)
Loss (gain) on the disposal of premises and equipment		6			(14	)
Gain on the sale of other real estate		(63	)		(109	)
Stock compensation expense		1,856			2,035
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements		(392	)		(525	)
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(3,429	)		2,236
Net change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(3,974	)		247
Net cash provided by operating activities		21,899			36,076
Investing activities:
Purchases of securities available for sale		(373,761	)		(399,911	)
Proceeds from sales of securities		12,427			—
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities available for sale		396,367			392,855
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			(2,724	)
Proceeds from redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		591			—
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Reserve Bank stock		490			—
Proceeds from redemption of interest bearing due from banks		1,761			—
Net change in loans		(49,280	)		(170,843	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(3,321	)		(2,694	)
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment		45			230
Proceeds from surrender of acquired bank bank owned life insurance		3,431			—
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance mortality benefit		909			—
Other investment activities		(1,532	)		(2,542	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets		868			2,860
Cash for acquisition, net of cash acquired		(24,684	)		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(35,689	)		(182,769	)
Financing activities:
Net change in deposits		(36,464	)		(37,834	)
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased		(2,086	)		113,443
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		60,000			60,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(67,250	)		(60,637	)
Repayment of acquired bank holding company line of credit		(2,300	)		—
Redemption of acquired bank subordinated debentures		(3,609	)		—
Common stock repurchases		(5,780	)		(2,086	)
Cash dividends paid		(11,621	)		(10,441	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(69,110	)		62,445
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(82,900	)		(84,248	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		198,939			139,248
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	116,039		$	55,000

	January 1, 2020
(in thousands)	As reported under ASC 326		Pre-ASC 326 Adoption		Impact of Adoption (1)

Allowance for credit losses on loans:

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied	$	8,333	$	5,235	$	3,098
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		6,219		3,327		2,892
Total commercial real estate		14,552		8,562		5,990

Commercial and industrial - term		7,147		6,782		365
Commercial and industrial - line of credit		4,129		5,657		(1,528	)
Total commercial and industrial		11,276		12,439		(1,163	)

Residential real estate - owner occupied		2,713		1,527		1,186
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		1,376		947		429
Total residential real estate		4,089		2,474		1,615

Construction and land development		5,161		2,105		3,056
Home equity lines of credit		842		728		114
Consumer		398		100		298
Leases		233		237		(4	)
Credit cards - commercial		96		146		(50	)
Total allowance for credit losses on loans	$	36,647	$	26,791	$	9,856

Total allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet exposures	$	3,850	$	350	$	3,500

	May 1, 2019
	As Recorded			Fair Value				Recast				As Recorded
(in thousands)	by KSB			Adjustments (1)				Adjustments				by Bancorp
Assets acquired:

Cash and due from banks	$	3,316		$	—			$	—			$	3,316
Interest bearing due from banks		1,761			—				—				1,761
Available for sale debt securities		12,404			23		a		—				12,427
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		1,517			—				—				1,517
Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost		490			—				—				490
Loans		165,744			(1,597	)	b		(118	)	b		164,029
Allowance for credit losses		(1,812	)		1,812		b		—				—
Net loans		163,932			215				(118	)			164,029
Premises and equipment, net		4,358			(1,328	)	c		431		c		3,461
Bank owned life insurance		3,431			—				—				3,431
Core deposit intangible		—			1,519		d		—				1,519
Other real estate owned		325			(325	)	e		—				—
Other assets and accrued interest receivable		867			(36	)	f		—				831
Total assets acquired	$	192,401		$	68			$	313			$	192,782

Liabilities assumed:

Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	24,939		$	—			$	—			$	24,939
Interest bearing		100,839			(252	)	g		—				100,587
Total deposits		125,778			(252	)			—				125,526

Federal funds purchased		1,566			—				—				1,566
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		43,718			(419	)	h		—				43,299
Subordinated note		3,609			—				—				3,609
Holding Company line of credit		2,300			—				—				2,300
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable		313			—				—				313

Total liabilities assumed		177,284			(671	)			—				176,613

Net assets acquired	$	15,117		$	739			$	313			$	16,169

Cash consideration paid													(28,000	)

Goodwill												$	11,831

~~Acquisition of King Bancorp, Inc.~~
~~Summary of Assets Aquired and Liabilities Assumed~~

(In thousands)	Amortized		Unrealized
June 30, 2019	cost		Gains		Losses			Fair value

Government sponsored enterprise obligations	$	266,579	$	1,755	$	(319	)	$	268,015
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies		131,447		938		(787	)		131,598
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		23,854		118		(6	)		23,966

Total securities available for sale	$	421,880	$	2,811	$	(1,112	)	$	423,579

December 31, 2018
Government sponsored enterprise obligations		264,234		156		(3,351	)		261,039
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies		149,748		282		(3,753	)		146,277
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		29,760		107		(188	)		29,679

Total securities available for sale	$	443,742	$	545	$	(7,292	)	$	436,995

(in thousands)			Unrealized					Allowance
June 30, 2020	Amortized cost		Gains		Losses			for Credit Losses		Fair value

Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Government sponsored enterprise obligations		199,838		4,788		(215	)		—		204,411
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies		262,565		7,702		(13	)		—		270,254
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		10,394		190		—			—		10,584

Total available for sale debt securities	$	472,797	$	12,680	$	(228	)	$	—	$	485,249

December 31, 2019

Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	49,887	$	10	$	—		$	—	$	49,897
Government sponsored enterprise obligations		208,933		1,189		(178	)		—		209,944
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies		193,574		1,243		(956	)		—		193,861
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		16,919		117		—			—		17,036

Total available for sale debt securities	$	469,313	$	2,559	$	(1,134	)	$	—	$	470,738

(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Fair value
(in thousands)					Amortized cost		Fair value

Due within 1 year	$	132,158	$	132,133	$	75,092	$	75,164
Due after 1 year but within 5 years		56,040		56,033		31,457		32,114
Due after 5 years but within 10 years		7,157		7,232		3,972		4,145
Due after 10 years		95,078		96,583		99,711		103,572
Mortgage backed securities - government agencies		131,447		131,598		262,565		270,254
Total securities available for sale	$	421,880	$	423,579	$	472,797	$	485,249

(In thousands)	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total

	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
June 30, 2019	value		losses			value		losses			value		losses

Government sponsored enterprise obligations	$	—	$	—		$	57,505	$	(319	)	$	57,505	$	(319	)
Mortgage-backed securities - government agencies		—		—			82,088		(787	)		82,088		(787	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		—			6,485		(6	)		6,485		(6	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	—	$	—		$	146,078	$	(1,112	)	$	146,078	$	(1,112	)

December 31, 2018
Government sponsored enterprise obligations		96,740		(38	)		149,320		(3,313	)		246,060		(3,351	)
Mortgage-backed securities - government agencies		3,108		(5	)		120,848		(3,748	)		123,956		(3,753	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		814		(1	)		17,639		(187	)		18,453		(188	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	100,662	$	(44	)	$	287,807	$	(7,248	)	$	388,469	$	(7,292	)

(In thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
(in thousands)					December 31, 2019

Commercial and industrial	$	860,085	$	833,524	$	870,511
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land~~(1)~~		222,632		225,050		213,822
Undeveloped land		35,169		30,092		46,360

Real estate mortgage:
Commercial investment		696,421		588,610		736,618
Owner occupied commercial		452,719		426,373		473,783
1-4 family residential		338,957		276,017		334,358
Home equity - first lien		46,012		49,500		48,620
Home equity - junior lien		67,948		70,947		73,477
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		1,602,057		1,411,447		1,666,856

Consumer		43,937		48,058		47,467
Total loans(2)	$	2,763,880	$	2,548,171
Total loans (1)					$	2,845,016

(1~~) Consists of land acquired for development by the borrower, but for which~~ no ~~development has yet taken place~~.
(2) Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts, and net of loan origination fees and costs.

	May 1, 2019
	Contractual		Non-accretable			Accretable			Acquisition-day
(In thousands)	receivable		amount			amount			fair value

Commercial and industrial	$	8,249	$	—		$	(23	)	$	8,226
Construction and development		10,764		—			43			10,807
Raw Land		7,974		—			43			8,017
Real estate mortgage:
Commercial real estate		84,219		—			(408	)		83,811
1-4 family residential		50,556		—			322			50,878
Home equity - first lien		196		—			3			199
Home equity - junior lien		679		—			5			684
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		135,650		—			(78	)		135,572

Consumer		1,528		—			(3	)		1,525

Total loans ASC 310-20		164,165		—			(18	)		164,147

Commercial and industrial
Construction and development		—		—			—			—
Raw Land		—		—			—			—
Real estate mortgage:
Commercial real estate		1,351		(1,351	)		—			—
1-4 family residential		228		(228	)		—			—
Home equity - first lien		—		—			—			—
Home equity - junior lien		—		—			—			—
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		1,579		(1,579	)		—			—

Consumer		—		—			—			—

Total loans ASC 310 purchased- credit-impaired loans		1,579		(1,579	)		—			—

Total loans	$	165,744	$	(1,579	)	$	(18	)	$	164,147

(in thousands) Three Months Ended June 30, 2020	Beginning Balance		Impact of Adopting ASC 326		Initial ACL on Loans Purchased with Credit Deterioration		Provision for Credit Losses			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Ending Balance

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied	$	13,435	$	-	$	-	$	5,403		$	-		$	1	$	18,839
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		6,509		-		-		197			-			-		6,706
Total commercial real estate		19,944		-		-		5,600			-			1		25,545

Commercial and industrial - term		7,990		-		-		(651	)		-			-		7,339
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit		3,866		-		-		(624	)		-			-		3,242
Total commercial and industrial		11,856		-		-		(1,275	)		-			-		10,581

Residential real estate - owner occupied		2,702		-		-		162			(18	)		2		2,848
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		1,419		-		-		175			-			-		1,594
Total residential real estate		4,121		-		-		337			(18	)		2		4,442

Construction and land development		5,185		-		-		423			-			-		5,608
Home equity lines of credit		623		-		-		209			-			-		832
Consumer		198		-		-		134			(80	)		110		362
Leases		159		-		-		64			-			-		223
Credit cards - commercial		57		-		-		58			-			-		115
Total net loan (charge-offs) recoveries	$	42,143	$	-	$	-	$	5,550		$	(98	)	$	113	$	47,708

(in thousands) Six Months Ended June 30, 2020	Beginning Balance		Impact of Adopting ASC 326			Initial ACL on Loans Purchased with Credit Deterioration		Provision for Credit Losses			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Ending Balance

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied	$	5,235	$	2,946		$	152	$	10,503		$	-		$	3	$	18,839
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		3,327		1,542			1,350		487			-			-		6,706
Total commercial real estate		8,562		4,488			1,502		10,990			-			3		25,545

Commercial and industrial - term		6,782		365			-		185			-			7		7,339
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit		5,657		(1,528	)		-		(887	)		-			-		3,242
Total commercial and industrial		12,439		(1,163	)		-		(702	)		-			7		10,581

Residential real estate - owner occupied		1,527		1,087			99		151			(18	)		2		2,848
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		947		429			-		218			-			-		1,594
Total residential real estate		2,474		1,516			99		369			(18	)		2		4,442

Construction and land development		2,105		3,056			-		447			-			-		5,608
Home equity lines of credit		728		114			-		(10	)		-			-		832
Consumer		100		264			34		(3	)		(254	)		221		362
Leases		237		(4	)		-		(10	)		-			-		223
Credit cards - commercial		146		(50	)		-		19			-			-		115
Total net loan (charge-offs) recoveries	$	26,791	$	8,221		$	1,635	$	11,100		$	(272	)	$	233	$	47,708

(in thousands) Six Months Ended Six June 30, 2019	Beginning Balance		Provision for Credit Losses			Charge-offs			Recoveries		Ending Balance

Real estate mortgage	$	10,681	$	1,310		$	(13	)	$	52	$	12,030
Commercial and industrial		11,965		(210	)		(3	)		106		11,858
Construction and development		1,760		(153	)		-			203		1,810
Undeveloped land		752		(151	)		-			-		601
Consumer		376		(196	)		(244	)		181		117
	$	25,534	$	600		$	(260	)	$	542	$	26,416

(in thousands) June 30, 2020	Real Estate		Accounts Receivable / Equipment		Other		Total		ACL Allocation

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied	$	10,569	$	-	$	-	$	10,569	$	2,255
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		3,014		-		-		3,014		1,351
Total commercial real estate		13,583		-		-		13,583		3,606

Commercial and industrial - term		-		9		18		27		18
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit		-		-		-		-		-
Total commercial and industrial		-		9		18		27		18

Residential real estate - owner occupied		445		-		-		445		99
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		225		-		-		225		-
Total residential real estate		670		-		-		670		99

Construction and land development		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity lines of credit		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		26		26		26
Leases		-		-		-		-		-
Credit cards - commercial		-		-		-		-		-
Total collateral dependent loans	$	14,253	$	9	$	44	$	14,306	$	3,749

	Loans								ACL
(in thousands) December 31, 2019	Loans individually evaluated for impairment		Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		Total loans		Loans individually evaluated for impairment		Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		Total ACL

Commercial and industrial	$	8,223	$	862,288	$	—	$	870,511	$	1,150	$	11,672	$	—	$	12,822
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land		—		213,822		—		213,822		—		1,319		—		1,319
Undeveloped land		—		46,360		—		46,360		—		786		—		786
Real estate mortgage		3,307		1,663,549		—		1,666,856		13		11,751		—		11,764
Consumer		—		47,467		—		47,467		—		100		—		100

Total	$	11,530	$	2,833,486	$	—	$	2,845,016	$	1,163	$	25,628	$	—	$	26,791

	As of						Three months ended				Six months ended
	December 31, 2019						June 30, 2019				June 30, 2019

			*Unpaid*				*Average*		*Interest*		*Average*		*Interest*
	*Recorded*		*principal*		*Related*		*recorded*		*income*		*recorded*		*income*
(in thousands)	*investment*		*balance*		*ACL*		*investment*		*recognized*		*investment*		*recognized*

Impaired loans with no related ACL
Commercial and industrial	$	174	$	174	$	—	$	144	$	—	$	160	$	—
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land		—		—		—		—		—		106		—
Undeveloped land		—		—		—		—		—		158		—

Real estate mortgage
Commercial investment		741		741		—		311		—		254		—
Owner occupied commercial		2,278		2,736		—		1,455		—		1,165		—
1-4 family residential		124		124		—		779		—		773		—
Home equity - junior lien		151		151		—		462		—		356		—
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		3,294		3,752		—		3,007		—		2,548		—

Subtotal	$	3,468	$	3,926	$	—	$	3,151	$	—	$	2,972	$	—

Impaired loans with an ACL
Commercial and industrial	$	8,049	$	8,049	$	1,150	$	24	$	—	$	26	$	1
Real estate mortgage 1-4 family residential		13		13		13		14		—		14		—
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		13		13		13		14		—		14		—

Subtotal	$	8,062	$	8,062	$	1,163	$	38	$	—	$	40	$	1

Total impaired loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	8,223	$	8,223	$	1,150	$	168	$	—	$	186	$	1
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land		—		—		—		—		—		106		—
Undeveloped land		—		—		—		—		—		158		—

Real estate mortgage
Commercial investment		741		741		—		311		—		254		—
Owner occupied commercial		2,278		2,736		—		1,455		—		1,165		—
1-4 family residential		137		137		13		793		—		787		—
Home equity - junior lien		151		151		—		462		—		356		—
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		3,307		3,765		13		3,021		—		2,562		—

Total	$	11,530	$	11,988	$	1,163	$	3,189	$	—	$	3,012	$	1

(in thousands)			30-59 days		60-89 days		90 or more		Total		Total
June 30, 2020	Current		Past Due		Past Due		Days Past Due		Past Due		Loans

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied	$	814,610	$	121	$	35	$	698	$	854	$	815,464
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		469,529		256		—		2,672		2,928		472,457
Total commercial real estate		1,284,139		377		35		3,370		3,782		1,287,921

Commercial and industrial - term		1,140,384		59		14		9		82		1,140,466
Commercial and industrial - line of credit		253,645		41		310		100		451		254,096
Total commercial and industrial		1,394,029		100		324		109		533		1,394,562

Residential real estate - owner occupied		214,681		603		290		317		1,210		215,891
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		138,823		—		24		274		298		139,121
Total residential real estate		353,504		603		314		591		1,508		355,012

Construction and land development		255,399		—		—		48		48		255,447
Home equity lines of credit		103,672		—		—		—		—		103,672
Consumer		43,727		30		1		—		31		43,758
Leases		14,843		—		—		—		—		14,843
Credit cards - commercial		8,862		—		—		—		—		8,862
Total	$	3,458,175	$	1,110	$	674	$	4,118	$	5,902	$	3,464,077

					Past Due 90-Days-
(In thousands)	*Non-accrual*		*Total*		*or-More and Still*
June 30, 2020	*with no ACL*		*Non-accrual*		*Accruing Interest*

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied	$	213	$	10,569	$	-
Commercial real estate - owner occupied		1,663		3,014		-
Total commercial real estate		1,876		13,583		-

Commercial and industrial - term		9		9		-
Commercial and industrial - lines of credit		-		-		-
Total commercial and industrial		9		9		-

Residential real estate - owner occupied		306		445		-
Residential real estate - non-owner occupied		225		225		-
Total residential real estate		531		670		-

Construction and land development		-		-		48
Home equity lines of credit		-		-		-
Consumer		-		-		-
Leases		-		-		-
Credit cards - commercial		-		-		-
Total	$	2,416	$	14,262	$	48

December 31, 2019 (in thousands)	Non-accrual		Past Due 90-Days-or- More and Still Accruing Interest

Commercial and industrial	$	8,202	$	—
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land		—		—
Undeveloped land		—		—

Real estate mortgage:
Commercial investment		740		396
Owner occupied commercial		2,278		—
1-4 family residential		123		104
Home equity - first lien		—		—
Home equity - junior lien		151		35
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		3,292		535
Consumer		—		—

Total	$	11,494	$	535

	Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
													Revolving		Revolving
													loans		loans
(in thousands)													*amortized*		*converted*
June 30, 2020	*2020*		*2019*		*2018*		*2017*		*2016*		*Prior*		*cost basis*		*to term*		*Total*

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied:
Risk rating
Pass	$	174,017	$	171,037	$	106,905	$	126,594	$	95,310	$	96,646	$	13,982	$	11,989	$	796,480
OAEM		61		-		-		-		1,578		52		472		-		2,163
Substandard		4,200		2,051		-		-		-		1		-		-		6,252
Substandard non-performing		9,727		-		-		614		-		228		-		-		10,569
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total Commercial real estate non-owner occupied	$	188,005	$	173,088	$	106,905	$	127,208	$	96,888	$	96,927	$	14,454	$	11,989	$	815,464

Commercial real estate - owner occupied:
Risk rating
Pass	$	102,192	$	109,160	$	91,659	$	53,309	$	44,522	$	49,472	$	7,144	$	851	$	458,309
OAEM		-		62		967		825		252		76		-		-		2,182
Substandard		-		6,997		1,363		105		127		360		-		-		8,952
Substandard non-performing		-		-		20		500		-		2,151		-		343		3,014
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total Commercial real estate owner occupied	$	102,192	$	116,219	$	94,009	$	54,739	$	44,901	$	52,059	$	7,144	$	1,194	$	472,457

Commercial and industrial - term:
Risk rating
Pass	$	768,510	$	110,924	$	111,287	$	51,862	$	43,348	$	26,536	$	-	$	7,755	$	1,120,222
OAEM		-		928		11,679		160		83		17		-		-		12,867
Substandard		5,249		1,853		-		-		189		77		-		-		7,368
Substandard non-performing		-		-		-		-		9		-		-		-		9
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total Commercial and industrial - term	$	773,759	$	113,705	$	122,966	$	52,022	$	43,629	$	26,630	$	-	$	7,755	$	1,140,466

Commercial and industrial - lines of credit
Risk rating
Pass	$	13,460	$	29,646	$	4,191	$	2,956	$	364	$	-	$	193,105	$	-	$	243,722
OAEM		-		-		-		-		-		-		783		-		783
Substandard		-		-		-		-		-		-		9,591		-		9,591
Substandard non-performing		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total Commercial and industrial - lines of credit	$	13,460	$	29,646	$	4,191	$	2,956	$	364	$	-	$	203,479	$	-	$	254,096

	June, 30
(in thousands)	2020

Credit cards - commercial
Performing	$	8,862
Non-performing		—
Total credit cards - commercial	$	8,862

(in thousands)							Substandard				Total
December 31, 2019	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Non-performing		Doubtful		Loans

Commercial and industrial	$	840,105	$	704	$	21,500	$	8,202	$	—	$	870,511
Construction and development, excluding undeveloped land		213,822		—		—		—		—		213,822
Undeveloped land		46,360		—		—		—		—		46,360

Real estate mortgage:
Commercial investment		722,747		6,459		6,275		1,137		—		736,618
Owner occupied commercial		460,981		1,375		9,050		2,377		—		473,783
1-4 family residential		332,294		1,701		122		241		—		334,358
Home equity - first lien		48,620		—		—		—		—		48,620
Home equity - junior lien		73,273		—		17		187		—		73,477
Subtotal: Real estate mortgage		1,637,915		9,535		15,464		3,942		—		1,666,856

Consumer		47,429		—		38		—		—		47,467

Total	$	2,785,631	$	10,239	$	37,002	$	12,144	$	—	$	2,845,016

	June 30, 2020						December 31, 2019
			Specific		Additional				Specific		Additional
			reserve		commitment				reserve		commitment
(in thousands)	Balance		allocation		to lend		Balance		allocation		to lend

Commercial and industrial - term	$	19	$	19	$	—	$	21	$	21	$	—
Residential real estate		—		—		—		13		13		—
Consumer		26		26		—		—		—		—

Total TDRs	$	45	$	45	$	—	$	34	$	34	$	—

In thousands	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018

Contractually-required principal	$	1,864		$	432
Non-accretable amount		(1,577	)		—
Accretable amount		(57	)		(68	)
Carrying value of loans	$	230		$	364

	Type of loan
			Construction
			and development,
Three months ended	Commercial		excluding
	and		undeveloped			Undeveloped			Real estate
(In thousands)	industrial		land			land			mortgage			Consumer			Total

Balance, April 1, 2019	$	11,762	$	1,884		$	662		$	12,001		$	155		$	26,464
Provision (credit)		92		(74	)		(61	)		10			33			-
Charge-offs		—		—			—			(13	)		(148	)		(161	)
Recoveries		4		—			—			32			77			113
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	11,858	$	1,810		$	601		$	12,030		$	117		$	26,416