Three and NineComparison of the three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019September 30, 2019

InterestThe Company generated interest income of $252,000$224,000 and $795,000$288,000 for the three and nine month periods ending September 30,March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  The decrease of $64,000 was primarily a result of decreased interest income from the Second A&R Note pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement and payoff of that note.  Interest income for the three month period ending March 31, 2020 consisted of $8,000 and $45,000$7,000 of cash interest income on our cash deposits, $48,000 and $144,000$83,000 of cash interest on  the S&L Note from S&L, $71,000 of cash interest on the Loan to Affiliate, $26,000 of paid in kind interest income on the Second A&R Note from Buyer $87,000 and $273,000 of cash interest on the S&L Note from S&L, $72,000 and $152,000 of cash interest on the Loan to Affiliate, and $37,000 and $181,000 of accreted interest income on the fair value adjustment to the subordinated secured promissory notes, respectively.notes.  The Company’s A&R Note from Buyer and S&L Note from S&L was paid cash interest current for the three month period ending March 31, 2020.  The Company generated dividend income of $50,000 and nine$7,000 for the three month periods ending September 30, 2019. Dividend incomeMarch 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  The increase of $43,000 resulted from holding HC Realty’s Series B Stock was $50,000 and $107,000acquired in March 2019 for the full three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2019, respectively. During the nine month period ending September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020.  During the three month period ending March 31, 2020, the Company received payments from Buyer of $2 million, in aggregate, pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement, the First Forbearance Extension Letter Agreement, and the Second Forbearance Extension Letter Agreement.  The payments were applied to the outstanding principal amount of the Second A&R Note resulting in satisfaction in full of the Second A&R Note pursuant to the terms of the Forbearance Agreement as amended.  As a distributionresult of its share of escrowed funds from Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (“CDSOA”) of approximately $1.2 million.  Thethe payments received on the Second A&R Note, the Company does not expect any future disbursements related to these escrow funds.  The Company also sold its shares in Buyer’s parent forrecognized a gain of $120,000$1.3 million on the payoff of the Second A&R Note during the ninethree month period ending September 30, 2019.March 31, 2020.

General and administrative expenses of $229,000 and $761,000increased to $439,000 for the three month period ending March 31, 2020 from $260,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 primarily due to an increase in legal and nineprofessional fees incurred in connection with the Company’s registration statement and amendments with respect to the proposed Rights Offering.  General and administrative expenses for the three month periodsperiod ending September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 consisted of $73,000 and $308,000$263,000 of professional fees, $63,000 and $155,000 of wages, $16,000 and $38,000$15,000 of fees and expenses primarily related to proxy and annual meeting voting, $20,000 and $77,000 of insurance expense, $21,000 and $64,000 of stock based compensation expense, and $36,000 and $120,000$56,000 of other operating expenses, respectively.

Duringexpenses.  Legal and professional fees incurred during the ninethree month period ending September 30, 2019, we recognized an impairment loss onMarch 31, 2020 consisted of $203,000 of one-time fees specifically related to the Second A&R Note from Buyer for $897,000.Company’s registration statement and amendments with respect to the proposed Rights Offering.

Our effective tax rate for the period isthree months ending March 31, 2020 and 2019 was effectively 0% due to our net operating loss carryforwards.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of liquidity include cash on hand, and cash interest earned on our cash on hand, and the S&L Note.Note, and the Loan Agreement with HC Realty, and dividends from our HC Realty common and Series B Stock. We expect cash on hand to be adequate for ongoing operational expenditures for at least 12 months from the date of these financial statements. At September 30, 2019,March 31, 2020, we had $2.0$4.5 million in cash and $232,000$233,000 in restricted cash. A portion of our unrestricted and restricted cash is currently held in savings accounts earning approximately 1.6%0.5%. We are being paid current interest on the A&R Note, the S&L Note with Stone & Leigh, LLC, and under the Loan Agreement with HC Realty. We also received quarterly dividends on our HC Realty common and Series B Stock of 5.5% and 10% annual rates, respectively.

Cash providedused by continuing operations for the ninethree month period ended September 30, 2019March 31, 2020 of $1.4 million$124,000 consisted of $645,000$161,000 of cash interest income received, $1.2 million$41,000 of CDSOA escrow distributions, and $59,000dividends on our HC Realty common stock, $50,000 of dividends on our HC Realty Series B Stock offset by $526,000$376,000 of payments to employees and suppliers. The payments to employees and suppliers primarily consisted of $155,000$70,000 of wages to current management, $218,000$201,000 of legal and professional fees, and $24,000$45,000 of insurance premiums.

Cash usedprovided by investing activities for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2019 included the Company’s investment in HC Realty’s common stock and Series B StockMarch 31, 2020 consisted of $3 million and $2 million, respectively. The Company also provided HC Realty’s operating partnership $2 million under the Loan Agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company received $120,000 of proceeds from the sale of our shares in Buyer’s parent company and received cash principal payments on the subordinated secured promissory notes of approximately $1.3$2.1 million.

Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

The CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the United States through September 30, 2007 to eligible domestic producers that supported a successful antidumping petition (“Supporting Producers”) for wooden bedroom furniture imported from China. Antidumping duties for merchandise entering the U.S. after September 30, 2007 have remained with the U.S. Treasury.

In November 2018, Customs distributed $66,000 in collected duties that were available for distribution in 2018. Our portion of these distributions was $26,000, representing 39.9% of the balance available for distribution in 2018. As a result of revisions to our percentage allocation, the Company does not expect any material future distributions for collected duties.

As the CDSOA distributed monies collected by Customs to eligible domestic producers that supported a successful antidumping petition (“Supporting Producers”), a portion of the proceeds were retained and held in an escrow account in order to fund future expenses (such as professional fees) related to the petition. During the first quarter of 2019, the Supporting Producers group decided, based on the current facts and circumstances of the petition, to disburse the portion of those funds related to the 2013, 2014, and first half of 2015 distributions. The Company’s share of the escrow release was approximately $1.2 million, which we received on March 15, 2019. The group of Supporting Producers expect that any remaining funds held in escrow will be used for future expenses related to the petition. The Company does not expect any future disbursements related to these escrow funds.

Due to the uncertainty of the administrative processes, we cannot provide assurances as to future amounts of additional CDSOA funds that ultimately will be received, if any, and we cannot predict when we may receive any additional CDSOA funds.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in our 20182019 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that some of ourthere have been no new critical accounting policies have changed as a result ofor material changes to our existing critical accounting policies and estimates during the Investment in affiliate.

Equity Method Investments - Long-term investments consist of investments in equity securities where our ownership is less than 50% and the Company has the ability to exercise influence, but not control, over the investee. These investments are classified in “Investment in affiliate” on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company records the investment at costs and subsequently increases or decreases the investment by its proportionate share of the net income or loss and other comprehensive income or loss of the investee. If the Company believes a decline in market value below cost is other than temporary, a loss is charged to earnings, which establishes a new cost basis for the security. The Company determination of whether an equity method investment is other than temporarily impaired incorporates both quantitative and qualitative information. The Company considers a number of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the length of time expected for recovery, the financial condition of the investee, the reason for decline in fair value, the ability and intent to hold the investment to maturity, and other factors specific to the individual investment.three months ended March 31, 2020.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made in this report are not based on historical facts but are forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” or “anticipates,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. These statements reflect our reasonable judgment with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include the occurrence of events that negatively impact the business or assets of HC Realty reducing the value of our investment in HC Realty, or that negatively impact our liquidity in such a way as to limit or eliminate our ability to use proceeds from the Asset Sale to fund acquisitions, or an inability on our part to identify a suitable business to acquire or develop with the proceeds of the Asset Sale. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this filing and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new developments or otherwise.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not required to be provided by a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Hollie Drive Litigation   

In November 2019, we received notice that the Company and the Buyer were defendants in a pending case in the Circuit Court for Henry County, Virginia. The case, which had been instituted on September 18, 2019 by Hollie Drive Associates, LLC (“Hollie”), raises issues arising from the purported breach of a lease for warehouse space in Henry County, Virginia, which is owned by Hollie and was previously rented by the Company. The relevant lease was assigned to the Buyer in connection with the Asset Sale.  The complaint asserts that the Buyer breached various provisions of the lease including failure to make certain rental payments and failure to pay for certain clean-up and reconstruction after the Buyer vacated the property. The complaint seeks damages in the amount of approximately $555,000 and attorney’s fees.  Hollie named the Company as a party because the Company was the original tenant under the lease. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Buyer agreed to assume and indemnify the Company against post-closing liabilities arising under the lease including those asserted in the complaint.  The Buyer’s filings in the case do not dispute the obligation to indemnify the Company for any damages awarded in the case. Based upon discussions with the Buyer and documents produced to date by Hollie, it appears Hollie has asserted damages greatly exceeding the likely recovery in the case. Given the relatively low damages amount and the Buyer’s indemnity obligation, the Company believes it is unlikely the case will result in a material adverse effect on its financial statements.           

Graham County Property Litigation

As previously disclosed, the Company received a letter from counsel for Graham County (the “County”), North Carolina asserting certain claims against the Company arising out theof a conveyance from the Company to the County of approximately 36 acres (the “Property”) in November 2014, including2014. The letter asserted that (i) the Company’s failure to disclose the presence of environmental contamination on the propertyProperty constituted a breach of contract and (ii) the indemnity agreements entered into in connection with the conveyance were void.  TheOn November 26, 2019, the County seeksfiled a complaint against the Company and the Buyer in the Superior Court for Graham County, North Carolina seeking, among other things, (i) rescission of the conveyance of the Property to the County, (ii)  reimbursement of costsexpenses incurred to date with respect to the environmental contamination and future costs of assessing and remediating the environmental contamination as well as resumption by the Company ofCounty in connection with the ownership ofProperty, (iii) to invalidate the Property.indemnity agreements entered into in connection with the conveyance,  (iv) and other damages, or (iv), in the alternative to rescinding the conveyance, expenses necessary to make the Property suitable and useable for a public park and outdoor recreation area. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Buyer agreed to assume and indemnify the Company against certain pre-closing liabilities including those relating to the conveyance of the Property. WeAfter the filing of the complaint, the Company entered into an agreement with the Buyer providing that, if the Company reaches a settlement with the County resulting in transfer of the Property back to the Company, then the Company can retain the Property notwithstanding provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement and will waive any right to indemnification from the Buyer with respect to the claims by the County with respect to the Property. Based upon the discussions with the County related to the amount of expenses incurred by the County, the Company does not believe the claims asserted with respect toby the Property are without merit andCounty will not result in a material adverse effect on our consolidatedits financial statements.

Item 1A.         Risk Factors

The following description of risk factors includes material changes to, and supersedes, the description of risk factors previously disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2019.

We have no revenue-generating operations owned directly by the Company and have limited sources of income following the Asset Sale, which may negatively impact the value and liquidity of our common stock.

As a result of the Asset Sale, we had no revenue-generating operations and no sources of income other than payments of interest and principal under the subordinated secured promissory notes from Buyer and S&L, then remaining payments to be made to us under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, refundable alternative minimum tax credits, and repayment at death of premiums we have paid for a split dollar life insurance policy for a former executive officer. As of March 19, 2019, our sources of income also include dividends on HC Realty Common Stock and HC Realty Series B Stock, and interest paid on the loan we made to HC Realty’s operating partnership. There can be no guarantee that suitable assets in addition to our investment in HC Realty will be available for us to purchase or that any assets acquired will generate the revenues anticipated or any revenue at all. A failure by us to secure additional sources of revenue could negatively impact the value and liquidity of our common stock.

We may not receive the amount owed us under the secured promissory note from S&L.

The S&L Note, which had an outstanding principal amount of $3.3 million as of December 31, 2019, will mature and the entire principal amount will be payable in March 2023.  S&L’s ability to make payments to us under the S&L Note may be adversely impacted by the current pandemic health event resulting from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as S&L’s operations may be adversely impacted by disruptions to the supply chain and distribution channels for its products caused by this pandemic. Consequently, we may have to record impairment charges with respect to the S&L Note. There is no guarantee that S&L will pay us the amounts owed under the S&L Note or that, in the event of default by S&L, the collateral securing the S&L Note will be sufficient to pay the S&L Note in full.

Our investment in HC Realty may lose value.

In connection with using cash proceeds from the Asset Sale to acquire non-furniture related assets, we acquired an equity interest in HC Realty on March 19, 2019 by purchasing HC Common Stock and HC Series B Stock. As a result of these and subsequent stock purchases, we currently own approximately 25.9% of the as-converted equity interest of HC Realty. On March 19, 2019, we also made a loan to HC Realty’s operating partnership. There is no guarantee that HC Realty will be successful implementing its business strategy for the acquisition, management and disposition of GSA properties and as a result our HC Common Stock and HC Series B Stock may lose value and the repayment of our loan to HC Realty’s operating partnership may be negatively impacted.

Our business may be adversely impacted as a result of the pandemic health event resulting from novel coronavirus (COVID-19).

The pandemic health event resulting from novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, economic activity nationally and globally.  These economic and market conditions and other effects resulting from novel coronavirus (COVID-19) may adversely affect us.  At this point, the extent to which the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) may impact us is uncertain. S&L’s ability to make payments to us under the S&L Note may be adversely impacted by the current pandemic health event resulting from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as S&L’s operations may be adversely impacted by disruptions to the supply chain and distribution channels for its products caused by this pandemic. Consequently, we may has have to record impairment charges with respect to the S&L Note.  We will also monitor the impact of this pandemic on our investment in HC Realty, but we are not currently anticipating a significant impact as HC Realty holds properties that are leased entirely to the United States Government for occupancy by federal agencies.

Our executive officers and some of our directors may have potential or actual conflicts of interest because of their positions with HCPM and HC Realty

Steven A. Hale II, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is sole manager of HPCM which serves as the investment adviser for the Hale Funds and two current holders of HC Realty Series B Stock.  The Hale Funds own approximately 24.7% of our outstanding common stock. We also own HC Realty Series B Stock and HC Realty Common Stock and hold debt of HC Realty’s operating partnership. Mr. Hale also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a director of HC Realty.  Bradley G Garner, our Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, also serves as a director of HC Realty and is chief compliance officer for HPCM.  Matthew A. Hultquist, one of our directors, also serves as a director of HC Realty and is a part time employee of HC Realty serving as Senior Vice President –Acquisitions.

Mr. Hale and Mr. Garner owe fiduciary duties to us, as well as to HC Realty as a result of their positions with HC Realty and to the Hale Funds and two current holders of HC Realty Series B Stock as a result of their positions with HPCM, the investment adviser to these parties.  Mr. Hultquist owes fiduciary duties to us and to HC Realty.  As a result, these executive officers and directors may have potential or actual conflicts of interest when faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and HC Realty.  In addition, Mr. Hale and Mr. Garner may have potential or actual conflicts of interest when faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and the Hale Funds or the two holders of HC Realty Series B Stock advised by HPCM.  For example, these potential conflicts could arise over matters such as funding and capital matters.

The value of our equity investment in HC Realty would be adversely affected if HC Realty failed to qualify as a REIT.

HC Realty has elected to be treated as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Its continued qualification as a REIT depends on its satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution and stockholder ownership requirements on a continuing basis. Its ability to satisfy some of the asset tests depends upon the fair market values of its assets, some of which are not able to be precisely determined and for which HC Realty has indicated it will not obtain independent appraisals. If HC Realty fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, and certain statutory relief provisions are not available, HC Realty would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and distributions to stockholders would not be deductible by it in computing its taxable income. Any such corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution. Unless entitled to relief under certain Internal Revenue Code provisions, HC Realty also would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which HC Realty ceased to qualify as a REIT. In addition, if HC Realty fails to qualify as a REIT, HC Realty will no longer be required to make distributions. As a result of all these factors, HC Realty’s failure to qualify as a REIT could impair its ability to expand business and raise capital and could adversely affect the value of our HC Common Stock and HC Series B Stock.

An “ownership change” could limit the use of our net operating loss carryforwards and our potential to derive a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards.

If an “ownership change” occurs pursuant to applicable statutory regulations, we are potentially subject to limitations on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards which in turn could adversely impact our potential to derive a benefit from our net operating loss carryforwards. While we have entered into a rights agreement designed to preserve and protect our net operating loss carryforwards, there is no guarantee that the rights agreement will prevent us from experiencing an ownership change and, therefore, having a limitation on our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards. In general, an “ownership change” would occur if there is a cumulative change in the ownership of our common stock of more than 50% by one or more “5% shareholders” during a three-year test period.

Our common stock is listed on the OTCQB and there may be limited ability to trade our common stock.

Trading of our common stock is currently conducted in the over-the-counter market on the OTCQB, which is generally a less active, and therefore a less liquid, trading market than other types of markets such as stock exchanges. As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock than if our stock was traded on other markets.

Failure to successfully identify, acquire and, to the extent applicable, operate non-furniture related assets could cause our stock price to decline.

Following the closing of the Asset Sale, we began evaluating alternatives for using cash proceeds from the Asset Sale to acquire non-furniture related assets. We have not acquired any assets other than the equity interest we acquired in HC Realty and we may not be able to identify other profitable assets. In addition, any assets that we do acquire, including our equity interest in HC Realty, may not be profitable. If we are not successful in identifying, acquiring and, to the extent applicable, operating non-furniture related assets, our stock price may decline.

We will likely have no operating history in the business of non-furniture related assets to be acquired, and therefore, with respect to certain assets, we will be subject to the risks inherent in establishing a new line of business.

Other than the equity interest we acquired in HC Realty, we have not identified additional assets to be acquired or the line or lines of business to which any such assets may relate and, therefore, cannot fully describe the specific risks presented by an acquisition of such assets. It is likely that we will have had no operating history in the line of business of any such assets to be acquired, and it is possible that any such assets that we may acquire will have a limited operating history in their business. Accordingly, to the extent we acquire any such assets, our future success may in part be subject to the risks, expenses, problems and delays inherent in establishing a new line of business and the ultimate success of such new business cannot be assured. In addition, prior to March 2019, our management did not have prior experience relating to the operations of a real estate investment trust such as HC Realty and the ultimate success of our investment in HC Realty cannot be assured.

Resources may be expended in researching potential acquisitions that might not be consummated.

The investigation of non-furniture company assets to acquire and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements and other documents will require substantial management time and attention in addition to potentially incurring legal and other professional expenses. If a decision is made not to complete a specific acquisition, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. As of December 31, 2019, we had incurred $10,000 of such related expenses. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached relating to a specific acquisition, we may fail to consummate the acquisition for any number of reasons including those beyond our control.

Ownership may become diluted if we complete our rights offering.

We have filed a registration statement with respect to a rights offering of up to 19.5 million shares of our common stock (the “Rights Offering”) to raise additional cash for acquisition purposes. If we complete the Rights Offering and you do not participate, you will experience dilution in your ownership. The Rights Offering is being commenced following the effectiveness of the registration statement relating to the Rights Offering and will be made only by means of a prospectus.

We may be required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Under Section 3(a)(l) of the 1940 Act, an issuer is deemed to be an investment company if it is engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. The 1940 Act defines “investment securities” broadly to include virtually all securities except U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves regulated or exempt investment companies. Consequently, the A&R Note (while it was outstanding) and S&L Note, as well as the securities of HC Realty we hold, may be considered investment securities and we may fall within the scope of Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act.

A company that falls within the scope of Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the 1940 Act can avoid being regulated as an investment company if it can rely on certain of the exclusions or exemptions under the 1940 Act. One such exclusion is Rule 3a-2 under the 1940 Act, which temporarily relieves certain issuers that are in transition to a non-investment company business from regulation under the1940 Act (a “transient investment company”). The rule provides a one-year safe harbor for a company to comply with another exemption or exclusion under the 1940 Act provided that the company has a bona fide intent to be primarily engaged in a business other than that of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities. The one-year grace period started on the date of the Asset Sale, which was March 2, 2018, and ended on March 2, 2019. We did not acquire sufficient assets within one year from closing the Asset Sale as contemplated by Rule 3a-2. There is no assurance that we will not deemed subject to the 1940 Act and be required to register as an investment company.

While in transient investment company status, we have actively pursued alternatives for using cash proceeds from the Asset Sale for the acquisition of non-furniture related assets and acquired an equity interest in HC Government Realty Trust, Inc. (“HC Realty”) on March 19, 2019. On April 3, 2020, we used $1.0 million of our cash to purchase an additional 100,000 shares of HC Realty Series B Stock, as a result of which we currently own approximately 19.1% of the as-converted equity interest in HC Realty.  On April 9, 2020, we entered into a subscription agreement with HC Realty to use an additional $2.5 million of our cash to purchase an additional 250,000 shares of HC Realty Series B Stock.  Closing under this subscription agreement will occur on the earlier of certain property acquisitions by HC Realty or June 1, 2020 and is subject to customary closing conditions.  We purchased these additional 250,000 shares of HC Realty Series B Stock on April 29. 2020.  We now own approximately 25.9% of the as-converted equity interest in HC Realty and we are presumed to control HC Realty within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the 1940 Act.

If the rights offering is fully subscribed, we intend to use the proceeds for acquisitions of non-investment businesses, including purchasing additional HC Realty Series B Stock. We anticipate that these additional purchases will allow us to rely on the exemption from investment company registration set forth in Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act because we would own (i) at least 25% of the HC Realty Common Stock on an as-converted basis, resulting in us being presumed to control HC Realty within the meaning of Section 2(a)(9) of the 1940 Act and (ii) a sufficient number of shares of HC Realty Series B Stock so that we primarily control HC Realty within the meaning of Rule 3(a)-1 of the 1940 Act.

If the rights offering is not successful and we do not acquire at least 50% of the shares of the outstanding HC Realty Series B Stock, we could be deemed subject to the 1940 Act and be required to register under the 1940 Act. Registered investment companies are subject to extensive, restrictive and potentially adverse regulation relating to, among other things, operating methods, management, capital structure, dividends and transactions with affiliates.

The Company has not sought or obtained an exemptive order, no-action letter or any other assurances from the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff regarding the Company’s ability to rely on Rule 3a-2 or Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act, nor has the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff provided any such order, no-action letter or other assurances.  If we are required to register under the 1940 Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would significantly increase our operating expenses.

Our common stock may be deemed a “penny stock.”

Our common stock may be considered a “penny stock” as defined in the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder, unless the price of our shares of common stock is at least $5.00. We expect that our share price will remain less than $5.00. Unless our common stock is otherwise excluded from the definition of “penny stock”, the penny stock rules apply. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that the broker dealer, not otherwise exempt from such rules, must make a special written determination that the penny stock is suitable for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure rules have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. So long as our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules, the level of trading activity could be limited and it may be difficult for investors to sell our common stock.

Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders have significant voting power and may vote their shares in a manner that is not in the best interest of other stockholders.

Our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders control approximately 56% of the voting power represented by our outstanding common stock. If these stockholders act together, they may be able to exert significant control over our management and affairs requiring stockholder approval, such as the election of directors or the dissolution of the company. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock. This concentration of ownership may not be in the best interests of all our stockholders.

Our management, who will be employed on a part-time basis for the foreseeable future, currently has outside business interests that will require their time and attention and may interfere with their ability to devote all of their time to our business, which may adversely affect our business and operations.

Since our business will be limited until we find suitable non-furniture assets for acquisition, our only employees consist of our two executive officers, who will be employed for the foreseeable future on a part-time basis and who have outside business interests that could require substantial time and attention. Our executive officers are associated with Hale Partnership Capital Management LLC and devote significant time to its affairs. Our executive officers are also associated with HC Government Realty Trust, Inc. On March 19, 2019, we acquired an equity interest in HC Realty and made a loan to HC Realty’s operating partnership. We cannot accurately predict the amount of time and attention that will be required of our officers to perform their ongoing duties related to outside business interests. The inability of our officers to devote sufficient time to managing our business could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

17