Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filed, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

As of MayAugust 1, 2017, there were 10,906,37010,868,550 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, have been prepared by Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 24, 2017 (the “2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements herein should also be read in conjunction with the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year. The information furnished in the Company’s accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows reflects all adjustments that, in management’s opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned financial statements. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on September 18, 2008, as a Maryland corporation. Effective August 22, 2013, the Company changed its name from TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. to Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. The Company believes it qualifies as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and has elected REIT status beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009, the year in which the Company began material operations.

Since the Company’s inception, its business has been managed by an external advisor. The Company has no direct employees and all management and administrative personnel responsible for conducting the Company’s business are employed by its advisor. Currently, the Company is externally managed and advised by SRT Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”) pursuant to an advisory agreement with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”) initially executed on August 10, 2013, and subsequently renewed in August 2014, August 2015 and August 2016.every year. The current term of the Advisory Agreement terminates on August 10, 2017.2018. The Advisor is an affiliate of Glenborough, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Glenborough”), a privately held full-service real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of commercial properties.

Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”). During the Company’s initial public offering (“Offering”), as the Company accepted subscriptions for shares of its common stock, it transferred substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering to the OP as a capital contribution. The Company is the sole general partner of the OP. As of both March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owned 96.3% of the limited partnership interests in the OP.

The Company’s principal demand for funds has been for the acquisition of real estate assets, the payment of operating expenses, interest on outstanding indebtedness, the payment of distributions to stockholders, and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as well as development of properties. Substantially all of the proceeds of the completed Offering have been used to fund investments in real properties and other real estate-related assets, for payment of operating expenses, for payment of interest, for payment of various fees and expenses, such as acquisition fees and management fees, and for payment of distributions to stockholders. The Company’s available capital resources, cash and cash equivalents on hand and sources of liquidity are currently limited. The Company expects its future cash needs will be funded using cash from operations, future asset sales, debt financing and the proceeds to the Company from any sale of equity that it may conduct in the future.

The Company invests in and manages a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, located in the United States, real estate-owning entities and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. The Company has invested directly, and indirectly through joint ventures, in a portfolio of income-producing retail properties located throughout the United States, with a focus on grocery anchored multi-tenant retail centers, including neighborhood, community and lifestyle shopping centers, multi-tenant shopping centers and free standing single-tenant retail properties. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company invested, through joint ventures, in two significant retail projects under development.

As of March 31,June 30, 2017, in addition to the development projects, the Company’s portfolio of properties was comprised of 1312 properties, including one property held for sale, with approximately 601,000425,000 rentable square feet of retail space located in five states. As of March 31,June 30, 2017, the rentable space at the Company’s retail properties was 89%96% leased.

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X.

The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the OP, their direct and indirect owned subsidiaries, and the accounts of joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included.

The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, the Company’s acquisitions of properties beginning January 1, 2017, were evaluated under the new guidance. The acquisitions occurring during 2017 were determined to be asset acquisitions, as they did not meet the revised definition of a business.

The Company evaluates each acquisition of real estate to determine if the integrated set of assets and activities acquired meet the definition of a business and need to be accounted for as a business combination. If either of the following criteria is met, the integrated set of assets and activities acquired would not qualify as a business:

•    Substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in either a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; or

•    The integrated set of assets and activities is lacking, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs (i.e. revenue generated before and after the transaction).

An acquired process is considered substantive if:

•    The process includes an organized workforce (or includes an acquired contract that provides access to an organized workforce), that is skilled, knowledgeable, and experienced in performing the process;

•    The process cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay; or

•    The process is considered unique or scarce.

Generally, the Company expects that acquisitions of real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related intangible assets), or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay.

In asset acquisitions, the purchase consideration, including acquisition costs, is allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. As a result, asset acquisitions do not result in the recognition of goodwill or a bargain purchase gain.

Depreciation and amortization is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Tenant improvement costs recorded as capital assets are depreciated over the tenant’s remaining lease term, which the Company has determined approximates the useful life of the improvement. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that improve or extend the useful lives of

For acquisitions of real estate prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, which were generally accounted for as business combinations, the Company recognized the assets acquired (including the intangible value of acquired above- or below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and other intangible assets or liabilities) at fair value as of the acquisition date. Acquisition costs related to the business combinations were expensed as incurred.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with current period’s presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

The FASB issued the following ASUs which could have potential impact to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements:

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which amends (Topic 230), Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explainexplains the change during the reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. ASU 2016-18 will require adoption using a retrospective transition method. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires entities to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The guidance retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. However, the principal difference from previous guidance is that the lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases should be recognized in the statement of financial position. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under the previous guidance. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. Lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The Company is currently evaluatingbelieves that the impactadoption of ASU 2016-02 will not change the guidanceaccounting for operating leases on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenues arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which effectively defers the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies may apply either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this guidance. In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, ASU No. 2016-09 and ASU No. 2016-12, which provide interpretive clarifications on the new guidance in Topic 606. As theThe Company’s revenues are primarily generated through leasing arrangements. As such, management believes the Company’s revenue from leasing arrangements which are scopedfalls out of the scope of this standard the Companyand does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to have a significant impact on its financial statements. The Company believes, that its revenue stream from non-lease components, which is comprised of common area maintenance reimbursements, may be impacted by the adoption of ASU 2014-09.

On January 4, 2017, the Company purchased certain property located in the Hayes Valley neighborhood at 388 Fulton Street in San Francisco, California (“388 Fulton”). The seller was not affiliated with the Company or the Advisor. 388 Fulton is comprised of two leased commercial condominiums with an aggregate of 3,110 square feet of retail space. The aggregate purchase price of 388 Fulton was approximately $4.2 million, subject to customary closing costs and proration adjustments. The Company drew down $4.0 million on its line of credit facility with KeyBank to fund this acquisition.

On January 11, 2017, the Company purchased certain property located in the Silver Lake neighborhood of Los Angeles, California (“Silver Lake”). The seller was not affiliated with the Company or the Advisor. Silver Lake is comprised of two boutique retail buildings totaling approximately 10,497 square feet of retail space. The aggregate purchase price of Silver Lake was approximately $13.3 million subject to customary closing costs and proration adjustments. The Company drew down $11.0 million on its line of credit facility with KeyBank to fund this acquisition.

The Company evaluated the above transactions under the new framework pursuant to ASU 2017-01, which the Company early-adopted effective January 1, 2017. Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Refer to Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for further details. Accordingly, the Company accounted for the purchases of Silver Lake and 388 Fulton as asset acquisitions and allocated the total cash consideration to the individual assets and liabilities acquired on a relative fair value basis.

For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company incurred $27 thousand and $0.3 million, respectively, of acquisition-related costs. These costs were capitalized and allocated to land and buildings acquired on a relative fair value basis.

On January 6, 2017, the Company consummated the disposition of Pinehurst Square East, located in Bismarck, North Dakota, for a sales price of approximately $19.2 million in cash. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of Pinehurst Square East to repay $18.4 million of the outstanding balance on its credit facility with KeyBank.line of credit. The sale of the property did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results and its results of operations were not reported as discontinued operations on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The disposition of Pinehurst Square East resulted in a gain of $6.1 million, which was included on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations include net operating income of approximately $8 thousand and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to Pinehurst Square East.

The pro forma financial information below is based upon the Company’s historical condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, adjusted to give effect to the above sale transactiontransactions as if itthey had been completed at the beginning of 2017 and 2016, respectively. The pro forma financial information is presented for information purposes only, and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the transaction occurred at the beginning of 2017 and 2016, respectively, nor does it purport to represent results of operations for future periods (amounts in thousands):

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of March 31,June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):

The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of investments in the joint ventures as set forth in the table above. The joint ventures typically fund their cash needs through secured debt financings obtained by and in the name of the joint venture entity. The joint ventures’ debts are secured by a first mortgage, are without recourse to the joint venture members, and do not represent a liability of the members other than carve-out guarantees for certain matters such as environmental conditions, misuse of funds and material misrepresentations. As of March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has provided carve-out guarantees in connection with the two aforementioned unconsolidated joint ventures; in connection with those carve-out guarantees, the Company has certain rights of recovery from the joint venture members.

The Company has variable interests in, and is the primary beneficiary of, variable interest entities (“VIEs”) through its investments in (i) the Gelson’s Joint Venture and (ii) the 3032 Wilshire Joint Venture (both as defined below). The Company has consolidated the accounts of these variable interest entities.

On January 7, 2016, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunset & Gardner Investors, LLC (the “Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement”) to form a joint venture (the” Gelson’s Joint Venture”) with Sunset & Gardner LA, LLC (“S&G LA” and, together with the Company, the “Gelson’s Members”), a subsidiary of Cadence Capital Investments, LLC (“Cadence”).

The Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement provides for the ownership and operation of certain real property by the Gelson’s Joint Venture, in which the Company owns a 100% capital interest and a 50% profits interest. In exchange for ownership in the Gelson’s Joint Venture, the Company contributed cash in an amount up to $7.0 million in initial capital contributions and has agreed to contribute $0.7 million in subsequent capital contributions to the Gelson’s Joint Venture. In May 2016, the Company made an additional capital contribution of $0.2 million to the Gelson’s Joint Venture. In January 2017, the Company made another capital contribution of $0.8 million to the Gelson’s Joint Venture. S&G LA contributed its rights to acquire the real property, its interest under a 20 year lease with Gelson’s Markets (the “Gelson’s Lease”) and agreed to provide certain management and development services.

On January 28, 2016, the Gelson’s Joint Venture used the capital contributions of the Company, together with the proceeds of a loan from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC in the amount of $10.7 million, to purchase property located at the corner of Sunset Boulevard and Gardner in Hollywood, California for a build-to-suit grocery store for Gelson’s Markets (the “Gelson’s Property”) from a third party seller, for a total purchase price of approximately $13.0 million. The Gelson’s Joint Venture intends to proceed with obtaining all required governmental approvals and entitlements to replace the existing improvements on the property with a build-to-suit grocery store for Gelson’s Markets with an expected size of approximately 38,000 square feet. Gelson’s Markets was founded in 1951 and is recognized as one of the nation’s premier supermarket chains. Gelson’s Markets currently has 24 locations throughout Southern California.

Pursuant to the Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement, S&G LA manages and conducts the day-to-day operations and affairs of the Gelson’s Joint Venture, subject to certain major decisions set forth in the Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement that require the consent of all the Gelson’s Members. Income, losses and distributions are generally allocated based on the Gelson’s Members’ respective capital and profits interests. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement, the Company may be required to make additional capital contributions to the Joint Venture, in proportion to the Gelson’s Members’ respective ownership interests. Until the Company has received back its capital contribution and specified preferred returns, all distributions go to the Company; thereafter, the Gelson’s Joint Venture will distribute the profits 50% to the Company and 50% to S&G LA.

On December 21, 2015, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of 3032 Wilshire Investors, LLC (the “Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement”) to form a joint venture (the “Wilshire Joint Venture”) with 3032 Wilshire SM, LLC, a subsidiary of Cadence (together with the Company, the “Wilshire Members”).

On December 14, 2015 and January 5, 2016, the Company paid deposits in the amounts of $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, toward the acquisition of certain property located at 3032 Wilshire Boulevard and 1210 Berkeley Street in Santa Monica, California (the “Wilshire Property”). The Wilshire Joint Venture is in the process of redeveloping and repositioning, and intends to re-lease the Wilshire Property. On March 7, 2016, the Company contributed $5.7 million to the Wilshire Joint Venture. In May 2016, the Company made an additional capital contribution of $0.3 million to the Wilshire Joint Venture. In January 2017 and February 2017, the Company made two additional contributions of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, to the Wilshire Joint Venture. The Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement provides for the ownership and operation of certain real property by the Wilshire Joint Venture, in which the Company owns a 100% capital interest and a 50% profits interest.

On March 8, 2016, the Wilshire Joint Venture used the deposits and capital contribution of the Company, together with the proceeds of a loan from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC in the amount of $8.5 million, to acquire the Wilshire Property from a third-party seller, for a total purchase price of $13.5 million. The Wilshire Joint Venture is repositioning, and intends to re-lease the existing improvements on the property.

Pursuant to the Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement, 3032 Wilshire SM manages and conducts the day-to-day operations and affairs of the Wilshire Joint Venture, subject to certain major decisions set forth in the Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement that require the consent of all the Wilshire Members. Income, losses and distributions are generally allocated based on the Wilshire Members’ respective capital and profits interests. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement, the Company may be required to make additional capital contributions to the Wilshire Joint Venture, in proportion to the Wilshire Members’ respective ownership interests. Until the Company has received back its capital contribution and specified preferred returns, all distributions go to the Company; thereafter, the Wilshire Joint Venture will distribute the profits 50% to the Company and 50% to 3032 Wilshire SM.

The Company’s real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating leases for which the terms and expirations vary. As of March 31,June 30, 2017, the leases at the Company’s properties have remaining terms (excluding options to extend) of up to 19 years with a weighted-average remaining term (excluding options to extend) of approximately five5 years. The leases may have provisions to extend the lease agreements, options for early termination after paying a specified penalty, rights of first refusal to purchase the property at competitive market rates, and other terms and conditions as negotiated. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants. Generally, upon the execution of a lease, the Company requires security deposits from tenants in the form of a cash deposit and/or a letter of credit. Amounts required as security deposits vary depending upon the terms of the respective leases and the creditworthiness of the tenant, but generally are not significant amounts. Therefore, exposure to credit risk exists to the extent that a receivable from a tenant exceeds the amount of its security deposit. Security deposits received in cash related to tenant leases are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and totaled approximately $0.3 million as of March 31,June 30, 2017 and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2016.

During both the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred and expensed approximately $0.6$0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of interest costs, which included the amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $0.1 million for each period. Also during both the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred and capitalized approximately $0.9 million of interest expense related to the variable interest entities, which included the amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $0.2 million for each period.

During both the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred and expensed approximately $1.1 million of interest costs, which included the amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for each period. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred and capitalized approximately $1.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of interest expense related to the variable interest entities, which included the amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $0.2$0.3 million and $86 thousand, respectively.for each period.

As of both March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, interest expense payable was approximately $0.4 million, including an amount related to the variable interest entities of approximately $0.2 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.million.

The following is a schedule of future principal payments for all of the Company’s notes payable outstanding as of March 31,June 30, 2017 (amounts in thousands): 

During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the following transactions occurred under the KeyBank credit facility:Company’s line of credit:

In connection with the Company’s investment in the Wilshire Joint Venture and the acquisition of the Wilshire Property, the Company has consolidated borrowings of $8.5 million (the “Wilshire Loan”) from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC (as the lender) and 3032 Wilshire Investors, LLC (as the borrower). The Wilshire Loan bears interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, payable monthly, commencing on April 1, 2016. The loan was scheduled to mature on March 7, 2017, with an option for two additional six-month periods, subject to certain conditions as stated in the loan agreement. All conditions to extensions were

In connection with the Company’s investment in the Gelson’s Joint Venture and the acquisition of the Gelson’s Property, the Company has consolidated borrowings of $10.7 million (the “Gelson’s Loan”) from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC (as the lender) and Sunset and Gardner Investors, LLC (as the borrower). The Gelson’s Loan bears interest at a rate of 9.5% per annum, payable monthly, commencing on April 1, 2016. The loan was scheduled to mature on January 27, 2017, with an option to extend for an additional six-month period, subject to certain conditions as stated in the loan agreement. Those conditions were not met, but the Company negotiated a six month extension of the term on January 27, 2017. The new maturity date is July 27, 2017. The Company negotiated a nine month extension of the term on July 27, 2017. The new maturity date is April 27, 2018. The loan is secured by, among other things, a lien on the Gelson’s development project and other joint venture collateral as defined in the loan agreement.

Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company determines fair value using the following hierarchy:

The Company believes the total carrying values reflected on its condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and amounts due to affiliates reasonably approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.

The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a present value technique based on contractual cash flows and management’s observations of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. The Company significantly reduces the amount of judgment and subjectivity in its fair value determination through the use of cash flow inputs that are based on contractual

The following table provides the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s notes payable as of March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):

As part of the Company’s ongoing evaluation of the Company’s real estate portfolio, the Company estimates the fair value of its investments in real estate by obtaining outside independent appraisals on all of the properties. The appraised values are compared with the carrying values of its real estate portfolio to determine if there are indications of impairment.

For both the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not record any impairment losses.

On April 1, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved the reinstatement of the share redemption program (which had been suspended since January 15, 2013) and adopted an Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “SRP”). The SRP was subsequently amended on August 7, 2015 and August 10, 2016.

On October 5, 2016, the board of directors approved, pursuant to Section 3(a) of the SRP, an additional $0.5 million of funds available for the redemption of shares in connection with the death of a stockholder. 

The following table summarizes share redemption activity during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands, except shares):

Cumulatively, through March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company has redeemed 507,069544,888 shares sold in the Offering and/or its dividend reinvestment plan for $3.9$4.1 million.

In order to qualify as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to its stockholders. Some or all of the Company’s distributions have been paid, and in the future may continue to be paid from sources other than cash flows from operations.

Under the terms of the amended Key Bank credit facility, the Company may pay distributions to its investors so long as the total amount paid does not exceed 100% of the cumulative Adjusted Funds From Operations plus up to an additional $2.0 million of the Company’s net proceeds from property dispositions, as defined in the amended KeyBank credit facility;Company’s line of credit; provided, however, that the Company is not restricted from making any distributions necessary in order to maintain its status as a REIT. The Company’s board of directors evaluates the Company’s ability to make quarterly distributions based on the Company’s operational cash needs.

The following tables set forth the quarterly distributions declared to the Company’s common stockholders and Common Unit holders for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017, and the year ended December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed after adjusting the basic EPS computation for the effect of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. The effect of non-vested shares, if dilutive, is computed using the treasury stock method. The Company applies the two-class method for determining EPS as its outstanding shares of non-vested restricted stock are considered participating securities as dividend payments are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest. There was no unvested stock as of March 31,June 30, 2017. The Company’s excess of distributions over earnings related to participating securities are shown as a reduction in income (loss) attributable to common stockholders in the Company’s computation of EPS.

The following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands, except shares and per share amounts):

On August 7, 2013, the Company entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor. On August 10, 2016,July 25, 2017, the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor was renewed for an additional twelve months, beginning on August 10, 2016.2017. The Advisor manages the Company’s business as the Company’s external advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company will pay the Advisor specified fees for services related to the investment of funds in real estate and real estate-related investments, management of the Company’s investments and for other services.

On March 11, 2015, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of SGO Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC to form the SGO Joint Venture. On September 30, 2015, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of SGO MN Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC to form the SGO MN Joint Venture. For additional information regarding the SGO Joint Venture and the SGO MN Joint Venture, refer to Note 4. “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.”

Summarized separately below areThe following table sets forth the Advisor related party costs incurred and payable by the Company for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive an acquisition fee equal to 1% of (1) the cost of each investment acquired directly by the Company or (2) the Company’s allocable cost of an investment acquired pursuant to a joint venture, in each case including purchase price, acquisition expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. An acquisition fee is capitalized by the Company when the related transaction does not qualify as a business combination; otherwise an acquisition fee is expensed.

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive an origination fee equal to 1% of the amount funded by the Company to acquire or originate real estate-related loans, including any acquisition expenses related to such investment and any debt used to fund the acquisition or origination of the real estate-related loans. The Company will not pay an origination fee to the Advisor with respect to any transaction pursuant to which it is required to pay the Advisor an acquisition fee.

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive a financing coordination fee equal to 1% of the amount made available and/or outstanding under any (1) financing obtained or assumed, directly or indirectly, by the Company or the

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive an asset management fee equal to a monthly fee of one-twelfth (1/12th) of 0.6% of the higher of (1) aggregate cost on a GAAP basis (before non-cash reserves and depreciation) of all investments the Company owns, including any debt attributable to such investments, or (2) the fair market value of the Company’s investments (before non-cash reserves and depreciation) if the board of directors has authorized the estimate of a fair market value of the Company’s investments; provided, however, that the asset management fee will not be less than $250,000 in the aggregate during any one calendar year.

The Company reimburses the Advisor for all expenses paid or incurred by the Advisor in connection with the services provided to the Company, subject to the limitation that the Company will not reimburse the Advisor for any amount by which the Company’s total operating expenses (including the asset management fee described below) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeded the greater of (1) 2% of its average invested assets (as defined in the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement (the “Charter”)); or (2) 25% of its net income (as defined in the Charter) determined without reduction for any additions to depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash expenses and excluding any gain from the sale of the Company’s assets for that period (the “2%/25% Guideline”). The Advisor is required to reimburse the Company quarterly for any amounts by which total operating expenses exceed the 2%/25% Guideline in the previous expense year that the independent directors do not approve. The Company will not reimburse the Advisor for any of its personnel costs or other overhead costs except for customary reimbursements for personnel costs under property management agreements entered into between the OP and the Advisor or its affiliates. Notwithstanding the above, the Company may reimburse the Advisor for expenses in excess of the 2%/25% Guideline if a majority of the independent directors determine that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors.

For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s total operating expenses (as defined in the Charter) did not exceed the 2%/25% Guideline.

Under the property management agreements between the Company and Glenborough, Glenborough is entitled to receive property management fees calculated at a maximum of up to 4% of the properties’ gross revenue. The property management agreements with Glenborough are subject to review and renewalhave been renewed for an additional twelve months, beginning on August 9,10, 2017.

Under the Advisory Agreement, if the Advisor or its affiliates provide a substantial amount of services, as determined by the Company’s independent directors, in connection with the sale of a real property, the Advisor or its affiliates may be paid disposition fees up to 50% of a customary and competitive real estate commission, but not to exceed 3% of the contract sales price of each property sold.

Under the property management agreements, Glenborough is entitled to receive a separate fee for the leases of new tenants, and for expansions, extensions and renewals of existing tenants in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged by similarly situated parties rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties.

Under the property management agreements, Glenborough is entitled to receive a market-based legal leasing fee for the negotiation and production of new leases, renewals, and amendments.

In connection with the construction or repair in or about a property, the property manager is responsible for coordinating and facilitating the planning and the performance of all construction and is entitled to receive a fee equal to 5% of the hard costs for the project in question.

The unconsolidated joint ventures are party to certain agreements with Glenborough for services related to the investment of funds and management of the joint ventures’ investments, as well as the day-to-day management, operation and maintenance of the properties owned by the joint ventures. The joint ventures pay fees to Glenborough for these services. For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the SGO Joint Venture recognized related party fees and reimbursements of $48 thousand and $0.1 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the SGO Joint Venture recognized related party fees and reimbursements of $0.1 million and $0.2$0.3 million, respectively. For both the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the SGO MN Joint Venture recognized related party fees and reimbursements of $0.2 million.million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the SGO MN Joint Venture recognized related party fees and reimbursements of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The related-party amounts consist of property management, asset management, leasing commission, legal leasing, construction management fees and salary reimbursements.

The Company is dependent on the Advisor and its affiliates for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, purchase, and disposition of real estate and real estate-related investments,

As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. The Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its condensed consolidated financial condition or results of operations. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s properties, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the properties could result in future environmental liabilities.

On April 28, 2017, the Company paid a first quarter distribution in the amount of $0.06 per share/unit to common stockholders and holders of common units of record as of March 31, 2017, totaling approximately $0.7 million.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other unaudited financial data included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 24, 2017, which we refer to herein as our “2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.”

As used herein, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” and “Company” refer to Strategic Realty Trust, Inc., formerly TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc., and, as required by context, Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., formerly TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as our “operating partnership” or “OP”, and to their respective subsidiaries. References to “shares” and “our common stock” refer to the shares of our common stock. 

Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:

All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements included herein could be inaccurate, and undue reliance should not be placed upon on any forward-looking statements included herein. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed herein will increase with the passage of time. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the risks described in Part I, Item 1A of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this Quarterly Report Form 10-Q will be achieved.

We are a Maryland corporation that was formed on September 18, 2008, to invest in and manage a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, located in the United States, real estate-owning entities and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. During the first quarter of 2016, we also invested, through joint ventures, in two significant retail projects under development. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009, and we intend to operate in such a manner. We own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through our operating partnership, of which we are the sole general partner. We also own a majority of the outstanding limited partner interests in the operating partnership.

Since our inception, our business has been managed by an external advisor. We do not have direct employees and all management and administrative personnel responsible for conducting our business are employed by our advisor. Currently we are externally managed and advised by SRT Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”) pursuant to an advisory agreement with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”) initially executed on August 10, 2013, and subsequently renewed in August 2014, August 2015 and August 2016.every year. The current term of the Advisory Agreement terminates on August 10, 2017.2018. The Advisor is an affiliate of Glenborough, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Glenborough”), a privately held full-service real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of commercial properties.

As of March 31,June 30, 2017, we had two properties under development. The properties are identified in the following table (dollar amounts in thousands):

As of March 31,June 30, 2017, our portfolio included:

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):