UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014


¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-34693

CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



Maryland		27-1200777
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

50 Cocoanut Row, Suite 211
Palm Beach, Florida		33480
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(561) 802-4477

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x

Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



Class	Outstanding at ~~August 8,~~November 5, 2014
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest ($0.01 par value per share)	~~26,878,072~~33,997,934

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements.	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	2123
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.	3841
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	3942

	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	3942
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	3942
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	3942
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	3942
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	3942
Item 5.	Other Information.	4042
Item 6.	Exhibits.	4143

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013			September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(unaudited)					(unaudited)
Assets:
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	970,954	$	652,877		$	994,848	$	652,877
Cash and cash equivalents	11,935		4,221			67,056		4,221
Restricted cash	8,060		4,605			15,301		4,605
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entities	3,321		774			3,692		774
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 and $30, respectively)	3,803		2,455
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $65 and $30, respectively)						4,203		2,455
Deferred costs, net	6,840		7,113			7,202		7,113
Prepaid expenses and other assets	2,760		1,879			2,870		1,879
Total assets	$	1,007,673	$	673,924		$	1,095,172	$	673,924
Liabilities and Equity:
Mortgage debt	$	444,535	$	222,063		$	473,904	$	222,063
Revolving credit facility	98,000		50,000			—		50,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	13,992		12,799			17,818		12,799
Distributions and losses in excess of investments of unconsolidated real estate entities	—		1,576			—		1,576
Distributions payable	2,260		1,950			2,850		1,950
Total liabilities	558,787		288,388			494,572		288,388
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and unissued at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	—		—
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 26,877,757 and 26,295,558 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	266		261
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized and unissued at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013						—		—
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 33,997,682 and 26,295,558 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively						337		261
Additional paid-in capital	445,427		433,900			594,528		433,900
Accumulated deficit	729		(50,792		)
Retained earnings (distributions in excess of retained earnings)						2,389		(50,792		)
Total shareholders’ equity	446,422		383,369			597,254		383,369
Noncontrolling Interests:
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership	2,464		2,167			3,346		2,167
Total equity	448,886		385,536			600,600		385,536
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,007,673	$	673,924		$	1,095,172	$	673,924

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)


	For the three months ended						For the six months ended						For the three months ended						For the nine months ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue:
Room	$	43,978		$	28,960		$	77,935		$	53,195		$	57,482		$	33,182		$	135,417		$	86,377
Food and beverage	585			199			1,213			349			666			368			1,879			717
Other	2,021			1,202			3,629			2,213			2,098			1,362			5,727			3,575
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities	493			385			1,165			768			416			458			1,581			1,226
Total revenue	47,077			30,746			83,942			56,525			60,662			35,370			144,604			91,895
Expenses:
Hotel operating expenses:
Room	8,802			6,065			16,557			11,615			10,672			6,845			27,229			18,460
Food and beverage	432			182			899			317			487			189			1,386			506
Telephone expense	285			216			572			407
Telephone													356			236			929			643
Other hotel operating	507			378			950			727			609			430			1,559			1,157
General and administrative	3,847			2,680			7,274			5,186			4,439			3,159			11,712			8,493
Franchise and marketing fees	3,602			2,243			6,394			4,144			4,694			2,663			11,088			6,807
Advertising and promotions	859			651			1,689			1,308			1,059			738			2,749			2,046
Utilities	1,482			1,117			3,102			2,183			2,148			1,492			5,250			3,675
Repairs and maintenance	2,057			1,556			4,056			3,001			2,363			1,710			6,419			4,711
Management fees	1,396			887			2,490			1,631			1,883			947			4,373			2,430
Insurance	217			176			433			348			273			192			706			540
Total hotel operating expenses	23,486			16,151			44,416			30,867			28,983			18,601			73,400			49,468
Depreciation and amortization	7,365			4,026			13,680			7,778			10,273			4,748			23,953			12,526
Property taxes and insurance	2,809			2,045			5,458			4,032			3,254			2,297			8,712			6,329
General and administrative	2,364			2,064			4,686			4,046			2,718			1,910			7,403			5,956
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges	5,559			1,059			7,041			1,236			335			1,345			7,376			2,581
Reimbursed costs from unconsolidated real estate entities	493			385			1,165			768			416			458			1,581			1,226
Total operating expenses	42,076			25,730			76,446			48,727			45,979			29,359			122,425			78,086
Operating income	5,001			5,016			7,496			7,798			14,683			6,011			22,179			13,809
Interest and other income	12			111			26			115			62			9			89			124
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred fees	(4,362		)	(2,817		)	(8,100		)	(5,658		)	(6,714		)	(2,775		)	(14,815		)	(8,433		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			—			(184		)	(933		)	—			—			(184		)	(933		)
Loss from unconsolidated real estate entities	(2,000		)	(89		)	(2,316		)	(720		)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated real estate entities													845			(674		)	(1,471		)	(1,394		)
Net gain from remeasurement and sale of investment in unconsolidated real estate entities	66,701			—			66,701			—			—			—			66,701			—
Income before income tax expense	65,352			2,221			63,623			602			8,876			2,571			72,499			3,173
Income tax expense	(38		)	(45		)	(41		)	(45		)	(44		)	(30		)	(85		)	(75		)
Net income	65,314			2,176			63,582			557			8,832			2,541			72,414			3,098
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(108		)	—			(108		)	—			(132		)	—			(240		)	—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	65,206		$	2,176		$	63,474		$	557		$	8,700		$	2,541		$	72,174		$	3,098

Income per Common Share - Basic:
Net income attributable to common shareholders (Note 11)	$	2.46		$	0.12		$	2.40		$	0.02		$	0.32		$	0.11		$	2.70		$	0.15
Income per Common Share - Diluted:
Net income attributable to common shareholders (Note 11)	$	2.44		$	0.11		$	2.38		$	0.02		$	0.31		$	0.11		$	2.67		$	0.15
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic	26,437,878			18,147,108			26,355,237			17,682,199			27,370,815			22,508,988			26,697,483			19,308,809
Diluted	26,734,919			18,383,626			26,637,261			17,897,255			27,695,347			22,769,282			26,994,657			19,539,941
Distributions per common share:	$	0.24		$	0.21		$	0.45		$	0.42		$	0.24		$	0.21		$	0.69		$	0.63

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

Consolidated Statements of Equity

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)


	Common Shares				Additional Paid - In Capital				Accumulated Deficit				Total Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership				Total Equity			Common Shares					Additional Paid - In Capital				Retained earnings (distributions in excess of retained earnings)				Total Shareholders’ Equity				Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership				Total Equity
	Shares		Amount						Accumulated Deficit			Shares				Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership			Amount									Additional Paid - In Capital								Total Shareholders’ Equity				Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership				Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2013	13,908,907		$	137	Additional Paid - In Capital			$	240,355			$	Total Shareholders’ Equity	(35,491	)	$	205,001			Total Equity		$	1,611		$	206,612	13,908,907			$	137			$	240,355			$	(35,491	)		$	205,001			$	1,611	$	206,612
Issuance of shares pursuant to Equity Incentive Plan	22,536		—		337				—				337			—				337			22,536		—			337				—				337				—				337
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $6,746	8,568,500		86		127,335				—				127,421			—				127,421
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $9,796																							11,818,500		119			183,890				—				184,009				—				184,009
Issuance of restricted time-based shares	40,829		—		—				—				—			—				—			40,829		—			—				—				—				—				—
Issuance of performance based shares	17,731		—		—				—				—			—				—			17,731		—			—				—				—				—				—
Repurchase of common shares	(445	)	—		(7		)		—				(7		)	—				(7		)	(445	)	—			(7		)		—				(7		)		—				(7		)
Amortization of share based compensation	—		—		520				—				520			391				911			—		—			749				—				749				587				1,336
Dividends declared on common shares ($0.42 per share)	—		—		—				(7,764		)		(7,764		)	—				(7,764		)
Distributions declared on LTIP units ($0.42 per unit)	—		—		—				—				—			(108		)		(108		)
Dividends declared on common shares ($0.63 per share)																							—		—			—				(12,745		)		(12,745		)		—				(12,745		)
Distributions declared on LTIP units ($0.63 per unit)																							—		—			—				—				—				(163		)		(163		)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interest																							—		—			7				—				7				(7		)		—
Net income	—		—		—				557				557			—				557			—		—			—				3,098				3,098				—				3,098
Balance, June 30, 2013	22,558,058		$	223	$	368,540			$	(42,698	)		$	326,065		$	1,894			$	327,959
Balance, September 30, 2013																							25,808,058		$	256		$	425,331			$	(45,138	)		$	380,449			$	2,028			$	382,477
Balance, January 1, 2014	26,295,558		$	261	$	433,900			$	(50,792	)		$	383,369		$	2,167			$	385,536		26,295,558		$	261		$	433,900			$	(50,792	)		$	383,369			$	2,167			$	385,536
Issuance of shares pursuant to Equity Incentive Plan	16,542		—		337				—				337			—				337			16,542		—			337				—				337				—				337
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $461	486,969		5		10,506				—				10,511			—				10,511
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $6,881																							7,606,894		76			159,894				—				159,970				—				159,970
Issuance of restricted time-based shares	48,213		—		—				—				—			—				—			48,213		—			—				—				—				—				—
Issuance of performance based shares	31,342		—		—				—				—			—				—			31,342		—			—				—				—				—				—
Repurchase of common shares	(867	)	—		(18		)		—				(18		)	—				(18		)	(867	)	—			(18		)		—				(18		)		—				(18		)
Amortization of share based compensation	—		—		616				—				616			391				1,007			—		—			945				—				945				587				1,532
Dividends declared on common shares ($0.45 per share)	—		—		—				(11,953		)		(11,953		)	—				(11,953		)
Distributions declared on LTIP units ($0.45 per unit)	—		—		—				—				—			(116		)		(116		)
Dividends declared on common shares ($0.69 per share)																							—		—			—				(18,993		)		(18,993		)		—				(18,993		)
Distributions declared on LTIP units ($0.69 per unit)																							—		—			—				—				—				(178		)		(178		)
Reallocation of noncontrolling interest	—		—		86				—				86			(86		)		—			—		—			(530		)		—				(530		)		530				—
Net income	—		—		—				63,474				63,474			108				63,582			—		—			—				72,174				72,174				240				72,414
Balance, June 30, 2014	26,877,757		$	266	$	445,427			$	729			$	446,422		$	2,464			$	448,886
Balance, September 30, 2014																							33,997,682		$	337		$	594,528			$	2,389			$	597,254			$	3,346			$	600,600

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)


	For the six months ended						For the nine months ended
	June 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	63,582		$	557		$	72,414		$	3,098
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	13,623			7,739			23,862			12,446
Amortization of deferred franchise fees	57			40			91			61
Amortization of deferred financing fees included in interest expense	749			556			1,137			809
Net gain from remeasurement and sale of investment in unconsolidated real estate entities	(66,701		)	—			(66,701		)	—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	184			933			184			933
Loss on write-off of deferred franchise fee	—			64			—			64
Share based compensation	1,213			1,080			1,840			1,589
Loss from unconsolidated real estate entities	2,316			720			1,471			1,394
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Hotel receivables	(389		)	(204		)	(733		)	(151		)
Deferred costs	(136		)	296			(472		)	(118		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(619		)	(630		)	(718		)	(532		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,225			964			5,159			2,359
Net cash provided by operating activities	15,104			12,115			37,534			21,952
Cash flows from investing activities:
Improvements and additions to hotel properties	(7,721		)	(7,128		)	(10,119		)	(11,154		)
Acquisition of hotel properties, net of cash acquired	(265,288		)	(74,769		)	(297,299		)	(117,805		)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities	449			908			922			13,102
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entities	—			(1,649		)	—			(1,649		)
Restricted cash	(3,455		)	263			(10,696		)	(2,113		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(276,015		)	(82,375		)	(317,192		)	(119,619		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings on revolving credit facility	126,000			88,500			162,000			135,000
Repayments on revolving credit facility	(78,000		)	(137,500		)	(212,000		)	(166,000		)
Payments on debt	(1,342		)	(807		)	(1,973		)	(1,441		)
Proceeds from the issuance of debt	256,000			117,033			286,000			117,033
Principal prepayment of mortgage debt	(32,186		)	(100,130		)	(32,186		)	(100,130		)
Payment of financing costs	(531		)	(965		)	(1,120		)	(1,009		)
Payment of offering costs	(511		)	(6,746		)	(6,790		)	(9,796		)
Proceeds from issuance of common shares	10,972			134,166			166,851			193,805
In-substance repurchase of vested common shares	(18		)	(7		)	(18		)	(7		)
Distributions-common shares/units	(11,759		)	(9,090		)	(18,271		)	(13,883		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	268,625			84,454			342,493			153,572
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	7,714			14,194			62,835			55,905
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	4,221			4,496			4,221			4,496
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	11,935		$	18,690		$	67,056		$	60,401
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	7,129		$	5,241		$	12,502		$	7,592
Cash paid for income taxes	$	165		$	50		$	220		$	77

-continued-

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing information:

On January 15, 2014, the Company issued 16,542 shares to its independent trustees pursuant to the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan as compensation for services performed in 2013. On January 15, 2013, the Company issued 22,536 shares to its independent trustees pursuant to the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan as compensation for services performed in 2012.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company had accrued distributions payable of $~~2,260~~2,850. These distributions were paid on ~~July 25,~~October 31, 2014, except for $89109 related to accrued but unpaid distributions on unvested performance based shares (See Note 12). As of ~~June~~September 30, 2013, the Company had accrued distributions payable of $~~1,657~~1,900. These distributions were paid on ~~April 26,~~October 25, 2013, except for $6075 related to accrued but unpaid distributions on unvested performance based shares.

Accrued share based compensation of $~~206~~309 and ~~$169~~$253 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Accrued capital improvements of $~~424~~150 and $~~806~~1,121 are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

At December 31, 2013, there were costs of $91 included in deferred costs related to offerings completed in 2014.

The Innkeepers JV transaction (see note 7) partially resulted in a non-cash transaction whereby the Company's previously held joint venture deficit interest in the four Silicon Valley Hotels of approximately $6.9 million was recorded as part of the Company's acquisition in the Silicon Valley Hotels and related net gain from remeasurement and sale of investment.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

1. Organization

Chatham Lodging Trust (“we,” “us” or the “Company”) was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) on October 26, 2009. The Company is internally-managed and ~~was organized to invest~~invests primarily in premium-branded upscale extended-stay and select-service hotels.

In January 2014, the Company established an At the Market Equity Offering ("ATM Plan") whereby, from time to time, we may publicly offer and sell up to $50 million of our common shares by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"), in negotiated transactions or in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. acting as sales agent. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had issued ~~486,820~~705,820 shares under the ATM Plan at a weighted average price of ~~$22.53.~~$22.76. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was approximately ~~$39.0~~$33.9 million of common shares available for issuance under the ATM Plan.

In January 2014, the Company established a $25 million dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan ("DRSPP"). ~~Shareholders~~Under the DRSPP, shareholders may purchase additional common shares by reinvesting some or all of the cash dividends received on the Company's common shares. Shareholders may also make optional cash purchases of the Company's common shares subject to certain limitations detailed in the prospectus for the DRSPP. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had issued ~~149~~1,074 shares under the DRSPP at a weighted average price of ~~$22.12.~~$22.24. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was approximately ~~$25.0~~$24.9 million of common shares available for issuance under the DRSPP.

The net proceeds from any share offerings are contributed to Chatham Lodging, L.P., our operating partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), in exchange for partnership interests. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held by, and all operations are conducted through, the Operating Partnership. Chatham Lodging Trust is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and owns 100% of the common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Certain of the Company’s executive officers hold vested and unvested long-term incentive plan units in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as non-controlling interests on our consolidated balance sheets.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company owned 2930 hotels with an aggregate of ~~4,342~~4,540 rooms located in 15 states and the District of Columbia. The Company also owns a 10.3% noncontrolling interest in a joint venture (the “NewINK JV”) with NorthStar ~~Realty Finance Corp (“NorthStar”)~~(separate from the Inland JV), which ~~owns~~was formed in the second quarter of 2014 to acquire, 47 hotels from a joint venture (the "Innkeepers JV") between the Company and Cerberus Capital Management ("Cerberus") comprising an aggregate of ~~6,097~~6,094 rooms, and owns a 5.0% noncontrolling interest in a joint venture (the "Torrance JV") with Cerberus ~~Capital Management ("Cerberus")~~ that owns the 248-room Residence Inn by Marriott in Torrance, CA.

To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate the hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease our wholly owned hotels to taxable REIT subsidiary lessees (“TRS Lessees”), which are wholly owned by one of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) holding companies. The Company indirectly owns its interest in 47 of the NewINK JV hotels and its interest in the Torrance JV through the Operating Partnership. All of the NewINK JV hotels and the Torrance JV hotel are leased to TRS Lessees, in which the Company indirectly owns noncontrolling interests through one of its TRS holding companies. Each hotel is leased to a TRS Lessee under a percentage lease that provides for rental payments equal to the greater of (i) a fixed base rent amount or (ii) a percentage rent based on hotel room revenue. The initial term of each of the TRS leases is 5 years. Lease revenue from each TRS Lessee is eliminated in consolidation.

Table of Contents

The TRS Lessees have entered into management agreements with third party management companies that provide day-to-day management for the hotels. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, Island Hospitality Management Inc. (“IHM”), which is 90% owned by Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, managed 2728 of the Company’s wholly owned hotels and Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company managed two of the Company’s wholly owned hotels. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, all of the NewINK JV hotels were managed by IHM. The Torrance JV hotel is managed by Marriott International, Inc. ("Marriott").

~~Table of Contents~~

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applicable to interim financial information. These unaudited consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of equity, and consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full year performance due to seasonal and other factors including the timing of the acquisition of hotels.

The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and the related notes thereto as of December 31, 2013, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In April 2014, the FASB issued amendments to guidance for reporting discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity. The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale upon acquisition should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and adds new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). Early adoption is permitted for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We adopted this accounting standard update effective January 1, 2014 and do not expect the implementation of the amended guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position ofor results of operations, but do expect these amendments to impact the ~~Company~~Company's determination of which future property disposals qualify as discontinued operations as well as requiring additional disclosures about discontinued operations.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ~~AUS~~ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its financial statements.

Table of Contents

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entities Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entities ability to continue within one year of the date the financial statements are issued and provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. Certain disclosures will be required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. This guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017 and will not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

4. Acquisition of Hotel Properties

Hotel Purchase Price Allocation

The allocation of the purchase price ~~for~~(a) the Company's acquisition of four hotels located in the Silicon Valley ~~hotels~~region of California (hereinafter the "Silicon Valley Hotels") ~~includes~~, which included the ~~following hotels~~ (i) Residence Inn Silicon Valley I hotel, (ii) Residence Inn Silicon Valley II hotel, (iii) Residence Inn San Mateo hotel and (iv) Residence Inn Mountain View hotel and (b) the Cherry Creek Hotel, based on the fair value on the date of their acquisition, was ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):


	Silicon Valley Hotels (Preliminary)			Silicon Valley Hotels			Cherry Creek Hotel
Acquisition date	6/9/2014			6/9/2014			8/29/2014
Number of Rooms	751			751			194
Land	$	149,385		$	149,565		$	3,700
Building and improvements	156,902			159,391			26,300
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	17,565			14,897			2,000
Cash	25			25			1
Restricted cash				—			—
Accounts receivable	959			959			56
Deferred costs, net				—			—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	289			289			17
Accounts payable and accrued expenses				—			(62		)
Mortgage debt				—			—
Net assets acquired	$	325,125		$	325,126		$	32,012
Less: Fair value of interest in the Silicon Valley Hotels and NewINK JV	$	(59,813	)	$	(59,813	)	$	—
Net assets acquired, net of cash and Fair Value of interest in the Silicon Valley Hotels and New INK JV	$	265,287		$	265,288		$	32,011

Table of Contents

The Company incurred acquisition costs of ~~$4.8~~$0.3 million and ~~$5.1~~$7.4 million, respectively, during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, and ~~$1.1~~$1.3 million and ~~$1.2~~$2.6 million, respectively, during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013.

The amount of revenue and operating income from the new hotels acquired in 2014 are as follows (in thousands):


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended				For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	June 30, 2014				June 30, 2014				September 30, 2014				September 30, 2014
	Revenue		Operating Income		Revenue		Operating Income		Revenue		Operating Income		Revenue		Operating Income

Silicon Valley Hotels	$	3,075	$	2,113	3,075		$	2,113	$	12,836	$	7,966	$	15,911	$	10,079
Cherry Creek Hotel									840		468		840		468
Total	$	3,075	$	2,113	$	3,075	$	2,113	$	13,676	$	8,434	$	16,751	$	10,547

Pro Forma Financial Information

The following condensed pro forma financial information presents the unaudited results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 as if the acquisition of the hotels acquired in 2014 and 2013 had taken place on January 1, 2013 and 2012. The unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the acquisitions taken place on January 1, 2013 and 2012, nor do they purport to represent the results of operations for future periods (in thousands, except share and per share data).

~~Table of Contents~~


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended					For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	June 30,				June 30,					September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014			2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
Pro forma total revenue	$	56,383	$	51,034	$	103,511		$	94,462	$	62,109	$	54,694	$	168,884	$	149,120
Pro forma net income (loss)	$	3,404	$	65,465	$	(799	)	$	67,601	$	9,212	$	4,820	$	6,492	$	72,556
Pro forma income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.13	$	2.44	$	(0.03	)	$	2.52	$	0.27	$	0.14	$	0.19	$	2.13
Diluted	$	0.13	$	2.42	$	(0.03	)	$	2.50	$	0.27	$	0.14	$	0.19	$	2.12
Weighted average Common Shares Outstanding
Basic	26,877,757		26,877,757		26,877,757			26,877,757		33,997,682		33,997,682		33,997,682		33,997,682
Diluted	27,174,798		27,114,275		26,877,757			27,092,813		34,322,214		34,257,976		34,294,856		34,228,814

5. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level believed to be adequate to absorb estimated probable losses. That estimate is based on past loss experience, current economic and market conditions and other relevant factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $5965 thousand and $30 thousand as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Table of Contents

6. Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in hotel properties as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Land and improvements	$	244,236		$	94,847		$	248,120		$	94,847
Building and improvements	720,061			559,713			750,387			559,713
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	56,179			36,628			57,245			36,628
Renovations in progress	6,392			4,006			5,233			4,006
	1,026,868			695,194			1,060,985			695,194
Less accumulated depreciation	(55,914		)	(42,317		)	(66,137		)	(42,317		)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	970,954		$	652,877		$	994,848		$	652,877

7. Investment in Unconsolidated Entities

On April 17, 2013, the Company acquired a 5.0% interest in the Torrance JV for $1.7 million ~~in the Torrance JV.~~. The Torrance JV acquired the 248-room Residence Inn by Marriott in Torrance, CA for $31.0 million. The Company accounts for this investment under the equity method. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company received cash distributions from the Torrance JV as follows (in thousands):


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended				For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	June 30,				June 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
Cash generated from other activities and excess cash	$	—	$	908	$	38	$	908	$	62	$	25	$	100	$	25
Cash generated from financing activities									—		—		—		908
Total	$	—	$	908	$	38	$	908	$	62	$	25	$	100	$	933

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company owned a 10.3% interest in a joint venture (the "Innkeepers JV") with Cerberus, ~~Capital Management ("Cerberus"),~~ which owned 51 hotels comprising an aggregate of ~~6,848~~6,845 rooms until June 9, 2014. The Company accounted for this investment under the equity method. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company received cash distributions from the Innkeepers JV as follows (in thousands):


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended				For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	June 30,								September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
Cash generated from other activities and excess cash	$	—	$	—	$	411	$	—	$	—	$	1,894	$	411	$	1,894
Cash generated from asset sales									—		130		—		130
Cash generated from financing activities									—		10,145		—		10,145
Total	$	—	$	—	$	411	$	—	$	—	$	12,169	$	411	$	12,169

On June 9, 2014, the ~~Company~~Innkeepers JV completed the sale of ~~its joint venture with Cerberus,~~47 of the 51-hotels, owned by the Innkeepers JV ~~which owned a 51-hotel, 6,848-room portfolio,~~ to a new joint venture between affiliates of NorthStar and the Company’s operating partnership (the “NewINK JV”) ~~in which~~: NorthStar ~~effectively acquired Cerberus'~~owns an 89.7% interest in ~~47 of the 51 hotels from the Innkeepers JV.~~47-hotel portfolio. The remaining four hotels that were part of the 51-hotel Innkeepers JV Portfolio, each of which is a Residence Inn ~~that are~~hotel located in Silicon Valley, CA, were purchased by the Company (see note 4). The Company ~~owns a 10.3% interest~~accounts for its investment in the NewINK JV ~~which owns 47 hotels comprising an aggregate of 6,097 rooms. The Company accounts for this~~and its prior investment in the Innkeepers JV under the equity method. The remeasurement gain of the Company's interest in the four Silicon Valley Hotels as a result of the step acquisition was approximately $18.8 million and the net gain from the Company's promote interest in the Innkeepers JV was approximately $47.9 million ~~(credited~~(which was credited toward the purchase of the Silicon Valley Hotels), resulting in a total gain of $66.7 million from the transaction. The Company's gain resulting from this transaction will be rolled tax deferred between the basis of the Company's investment in the NewINK JV and the Company's basis in the four Silicon Valley Hotels. As of September 30, 2014, the Company’s share of partners’ capital in the NewINK JV is approximately $20.4 million and the total difference between the carrying amount of investment and the Company’s share of partners’ capital is approximately $17.5 million (for which the basis difference related to amortizing assets is being recognized over the life of the related assets as a basis difference adjustment).

Table of Contents

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company received no cash distributions from the NewINK ~~JV.~~JV as follows (in thousands):



	For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Cash generated from other activities and excess cash	$	411	$	—	$	411	$	—
Total	$	411	$	—	$	411	$	—

The Company’s ownership ~~interests~~interest in the NewINK JV is subject to change in the event that either the Company or NorthStar calls for additional capital contributions to the respective JV's for certain non-discretionary requirements, oror; solely in the case of a capital call by NorthStar, necessary for the conduct of business, including contributions to fund costs and expenses related to capital expenditures. The Company manages each of the NewINK JV and the Torrance JV (collectively, the ~~"JV"~~"JVs") and will receive a promote interest in each applicable JV if it meets certain return thresholds. NorthStar and Cerberus may also approve certain actions by each respective JV without the Company’s consent, including certain property dispositions conducted at arm’s length, certain actions related to the restructuring of each JV and removal of the Company as managing member in the event the Company fails to fulfill its material obligations under the applicable joint venture agreement.

The Company's investment in the Innkeepers JV investment is $0.0 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The Company's investment in the NewINK JV is ~~$2.5~~$2.9 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The Company's investment in the Torrance JV is $0.8 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The Company has concluded that this adjustment is not material. The following table sets forth the combined components of net income (loss), including the Company’s share, related to the Innkeepers JV and NewINK JV for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):


	For the three months ended						For the six months ended						For the three months ended					For the nine months ended
	June 30,												September 30,					September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014		2013			2014			2013
Revenue	$	72,857		$	70,914		$	136,570		$	132,207		$	67,160	$	72,761		$	203,730		$	204,968
Total hotel operating expenses	39,359			38,531			76,358			75,361			37,994		39,386			114,352			114,747
Operating income	$	33,498		$	32,383		$	60,212		$	56,846		$	29,166	$	33,375		$	89,378		$	90,221
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(19,843	)	$	1,443		$	(23,177	)	$	(4,552	)	$	6,104	$	(7,225	)	$	(17,073	)	$	(11,777	)
Gain (loss) on sale of hotels	$	—		$	(2,517	)	$	(5	)	$	(2,659	)	$	—	$	341		$	(5	)	$	(2,318	)
Net income (loss)	$	(19,843	)	$	(1,074	)	$	(23,182	)	$	(7,211	)	$	6,104	$	(6,884	)	$	(17,078	)	$	(14,095	)

Income allocable to the Company													$	627	$	(707	)	$	(1,755	)	$	(1,448	)
Basis difference adjustment													185		—			185			—
Total income (loss) from unconsolidated real estate entities attributable to Chatham	$	(2,039	)	$	(110	)	$	(2,382	)	$	(741	)	$	812	$	(707	)	$	(1,570	)	$	(1,448	)

1112

Table of Contents

8. Debt

The Company’s mortgage loans and its senior secured revolving credit facility are collateralized by first-mortgage liens on certain of the Company’s properties. The mortgages are non-recourse except for instances of fraud or misapplication of funds. Mortgage debt consisted of the following ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):


Collateral	Interest Rate		Maturity Date	6/30/14 Property Carrying Value		Balance Outstanding on Loan as of				Interest Rate		Maturity Date	9/30/14 Property Carrying Value		Balance Outstanding on Loan as of
Collateral	Interest Rate		Maturity Date	6/30/14 Property Carrying Value		June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		Interest Rate		Maturity Date	9/30/14 Property Carrying Value		September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (1)	2.66	%	November 5, 2016	$	235,426	$	98,000	$	50,000	2.66	%	November 5, 2016	$	240,399	$	—	$	50,000
SpringHill Suites by Marriott Washington, PA	5.84	%	April 1, 2015	11,719		4,849		4,937		5.84	%	April 1, 2015	10,665		4,805		4,937
Courtyard by Marriott Altoona, PA	5.96	%	April 1, 2016	10,744		6,276		6,378		5.96	%	April 1, 2016	11,619		6,225		6,378
Residence Inn by Marriott New Rochelle, NY	5.75	%	September 1, 2021	21,265		14,993		15,150		5.75	%	September 1, 2021	21,334		14,914		15,150
Residence Inn by Marriott San Diego, CA	4.66	%	February 6, 2023	47,631		30,305		30,546		4.66	%	February 6, 2023	42,276		30,186		30,546
Homewood Suites by Hilton San Antonio, TX	4.59	%	February 6, 2023	29,883		17,314		17,454		4.59	%	February 6, 2023	29,695		17,246		17,454
Residence Inn by Marriott Vienna, VA	4.49	%	February 6, 2023	33,473		23,730		23,925		4.49	%	February 6, 2023	33,195		23,634		23,925
Courtyard by Marriott Houston, TX	4.19	%	May 6, 2023	33,028		19,644		19,812		4.19	%	May 6, 2023	32,794		19,561		19,812
Hyatt Place Pittsburgh, PA	4.65	%	July 6, 2023	38,809		23,844		24,028		4.65	%	July 6, 2023	38,490		23,753		24,028
Residence Inn by Marriott Bellevue, WA	4.97	%	December 6, 2023	70,144		47,580		47,580		4.97	%	December 6, 2023	69,551		47,580		47,580
Residence Inn by Marriott Garden Grove, CA (2)	4.79	%	April 6, 2024	43,713		34,000		32,253		4.79	%	April 6, 2024	43,282		34,000		32,253
Residence Inn by Marriott Silicon Valley I, CA (3)	4.64	%	July 6, 2024	92,533		64,800		—		4.64	%	July 6, 2024	91,509		64,800		—
Residence Inn by Marriott Silicon Valley II, CA (3)	4.64	%	July 6, 2024	101,644		70,700		—		4.64	%	July 6, 2024	100,401		70,700		—
Residence Inn by Marriott San Mateo, CA (3)	4.64	%	July 6, 2024	72,489		48,600		—		4.64	%	July 6, 2024	71,759		48,600		—
Residence Inn by Marriott Mountain View, CA (3)	4.64	%	July 6, 2024	56,264		37,900		—		4.64	%	July 6, 2024	55,525		37,900		—
SpringHill Suites by Marriott Savannah, GA (4)										4.62	%	July 6, 2024	$	38,585	$	30,000	$	—
Total				$	898,765	$	542,535	$	272,063				$	931,079	$	473,904	$	272,063


(1)	Thirteen properties in the borrowing base serve as collateral for borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility at ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The interest rate for the senior secured revolving credit facility is variable and based on LIBOR plus 2.5%.


(2)	On March 21, 2014, the Company refinanced the mortgage for the Residence Inn Garden Grove hotel. The new loan has a 10-year term and a 30-year amortization payment schedule but is interest only for the first 12 months. The Company incurred $0.2 million in costs for early extinguishment of debt related to the old loan.


(3)	On June 9, 2014, the Company obtained 4 new mortgage loans secured by a first mortgage for the Silicon Valley I, Silicon Valley II, San Mateo and Mountain View hotels. The new loans have a 10-year term and a 30-year amortization payment schedule but are interest only for the first 60 months.


(4)	On July 2, 2014, the Company obtained a new mortgage loan secured by a first mortgage for the Savannah hotel. The loan has a 10-year term and a 30-year amortization payment schedule but is interest only for the first 60 months.

Table of Contents

The Company entered into an amendment (the "Amendment") to its amended and restated senior secured revolving credit facility on December 11, 2013. The Amendment extends the maturity date to November 5, 2016 and includes an option to extend the maturity date by an additional year. The senior secured revolving credit facility includes limitations on the extent of allowable distributions to the Company not to exceed the greater of 95% of Adjusted Funds from Operations (as defined in the senior secured revolving credit facility) and the minimum amount of distributions required for the Company to maintain its REIT status. Other key terms are as follows:



Facility amount		$175 million
Accordion feature		Increase additional $50 million
LIBOR floor		None
Interest rate applicable margin		200-300 basis points, based on leverage ratio
Unused fee		25 basis points if less than 50% unused, 35 basis points if more than 50% unused
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio		1.5x

~~Table of Contents~~

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $~~98.0~~0.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, of outstanding borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facility. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the maximum borrowing availability under the senior secured revolving credit facility was $175.0 million.

The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt, which is all of the Company's mortgage loans, by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates. Rates take into consideration general market conditions, quality and estimated value of collateral and maturity of debt with similar credit terms and are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $~~446.4~~476.3 million and $220.0 million, respectively.

The Company estimates the fair value of its variable rate debt by taking into account general market conditions and the estimated credit terms it could obtain for debt with similar maturity and is classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s only variable rate debt is under its senior secured revolving credit facility. The estimated fair value of the Company’s variable rate debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $~~98.0~~0.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company’s consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio was ~~2.87~~.3.02. Future scheduled principal payments of debt obligations as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, for the current year and each of the next ~~five~~four calendar years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):


	Amount		Amount
2014 (remaining six months)	$	1,317
2014 (remaining three months)			$	658
2015	8,313		8,319
2016	107,533		9,555
2017	3,802		3,802
2018	3,980		3,980
Thereafter	417,590		447,590
Total	$	542,535	$	473,904

Table of Contents

9. Income Taxes

The Company’s TRSs are subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company’s TRSs are structured under two TRS holding companies, which are referred to as TRS 1 and TRS 2, that are treated separately for income tax purposes.

The components of income tax expense for the following periods are as follows (in thousands):


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended				For the three months ended				For the nine months ended
	June 30,				June 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
Federal	$	28	$	35	$	30	$	35	$	34	$	21	$	64	$	56
State	10		10		11		10		10		9		21		19
Tax expense	$	38	$	45	$	41	$	45	$	44	$	30	$	85	$	75

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, TRS 1 had a gross deferred tax asset associated with future tax deductions of $~~3.2~~1.1 million. TRS 1 has continued to record a full valuation allowance equal to 100% of the gross deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of its deferred assets due to the cumulative taxable losses incurred by TRS 1 since its inception. TRS 2 has a gross deferred tax asset of $0.0 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

~~Table of Contents~~

10. Dividends Declared and Paid

The Company declared total common share dividends of $0.24 per share and distributions on long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units of $0.24 per unit for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~$0.45~~total common share dividends of $0.69 per share and distributions on LTIP units of ~~$0.45~~$0.69 per unit for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The dividends and distributions were as follows:


		Record Date	Payment Date	Common share distribution amount		LTIP unit distribution amount			Record Date	Payment Date	Common share distribution amount		LTIP unit distribution amount
January	January	1/31/2014	2/28/2014	$	0.07	$	0.07	January	1/31/2014	2/28/2014	$	0.07	$	0.07
February	February	2/28/2014	3/28/2014	0.07		0.07		February	2/28/2014	3/28/2014	0.07		0.07
March	March	3/31/2014	4/25/2014	0.07		0.07		March	3/31/2014	4/25/2014	0.07		0.07
1st Quarter 2014	1st Quarter 2014			$	0.21	$	0.21	1st Quarter 2014			$	0.21	$	0.21

April	April	4/30/2014	5/30/2014	$	0.08	$	0.08	April	4/30/2014	5/30/2014	$	0.08	$	0.08
May	May	5/30/2014	6/27/2014	0.08		0.08		May	5/30/2014	6/27/2014	0.08		0.08
June	June	6/30/2014	7/25/2014	0.08		$	0.08	June	6/30/2014	7/25/2014	0.08		$	0.08
2nd Quarter 2014	2nd Quarter 2014			$	0.24	$	0.24	2nd Quarter 2014			$	0.24	$	0.24

July								July	7/31/2014	8/29/2014	$	0.08	$	0.08
August								August	8/29/2014	9/26/2014	0.08		0.08
September								September	9/30/2014	10/31/2014	$	0.08	0.08
3rd Quarter 2014								3rd Quarter 2014			$	0.24	$	0.24

Total 2014	Total 2014			$	0.45	$	0.45	Total 2014			$	0.69	$	0.69

Table of Contents

11. Earnings Per Share

The two class method is used to determine earnings per share because unvested restricted shares and unvested LTIP units are considered to be participating shares. Unvested restricted shares and unvested LTIP units that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future would not be included in the computation of diluted loss per share, for the periods where a loss has been recorded, because they would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented. The following is a reconciliation of the amounts used in calculating basic and diluted net ~~loss~~income (loss) per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):


	For the three months ended						For the six months ended						For the three months ended						For the nine months ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Numerator:
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	65,206		$	2,176		$	63,474		$	557		$	8,700		$	2,541		$	72,174		$	3,098
Dividends paid on unvested shares and units	(69		)	(73		)	(145		)	(151		)	(36		)	(72		)	(181		)	(223		)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	65,137		$	2,103		$	63,329		$	406		$	8,664		$	2,469		$	71,993		$	2,875
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares - basic	26,437,878			18,147,108			26,355,237			17,682,199			27,370,815			22,508,988			26,697,483			19,308,809
Effect of dilutive securities:
Unvested shares	297,041			236,518			282,024			215,056			324,532			260,294			297,174			231,132
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted	26,734,919			18,383,626			26,637,261			17,897,255			27,695,347			22,769,282			26,994,657			19,539,941
Basic income per Common Share:
Net income attributable to common shareholders per weighted average basic common share	$	2.46		$	0.12		$	2.40		$	0.02		$	0.32		$	0.11		$	2.70		$	0.15
Diluted income per Common Share:
Net income attributable to common shareholders per weighted average diluted common share	$	2.44		$	0.11		$	2.38		$	0.02		$	0.31		$	0.11		$	2.67		$	0.15

1416

Table of Contents

12. Equity Incentive Plan

The Company maintains its Equity Incentive Plan to attract and retain independent trustees, executive officers and other key employees and service providers. The plan provides for the grant of options to purchase common shares, share awards, share appreciation rights, performance units and other equity-based awards. The plan was amended and restated as of May 17, 2013 to increase the maximum number of shares available under the plan to 3,000,000 shares. Share awards under this plan generally vest over three years, though compensation for the Company’s independent trustees includes shares granted that vest immediately. The Company pays dividends on unvested shares and units, except for performance based shares, for which dividends on unvested performance based shares are not paid until those shares are vested. Certain awards may provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. In January 2014 and 2013, the Company issued 16,542 and 22,536 common shares, respectively, to its independent trustees as compensation for services performed in 2013 and 2012. The quantity of shares was calculated based on the average of the closing ~~prices~~price for the Company’s common shares on the ~~New York Stock Exchange~~NYSE for the last ten trading days preceding the reporting date. The Company would have distributed ~~9,137~~13,518 common shares for services performed in 2014 had this liability classified award been satisfied as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there were 2,296,458 common shares available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan.

Restricted Share Awards

A summary of the shares granted to executive officers that have not fully vested pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 are:


Award Type	Award Date	Total Shares Granted	Vested as of June 30, 2014	Award Date	Total Shares Granted	Vested as of September 30, 2014
2012 Time-based Awards	2/23/2012	61,376	40,918	2/23/2012	61,376	40,918
2012 Performance-based Awards	2/23/2012	53,191	35,462	2/23/2012	53,191	35,462
2013 Time-based Awards	1/29/2013	40,829	13,611	1/29/2013	40,829	13,611
2013 Performance-based Awards	5/17/2013	40,829	13,611	5/17/2013	40,829	13,611
2014 Time-based Awards	1/31/2014	48,213	��	1/31/2014	48,213	—
2014 Performance-based Awards	1/31/2014	38,805	—	1/31/2014	38,805	—

Time-based shares will vest over a three-year period. The performance-based shares will be issued and vest over a three-year period only if and to the extent that long-term performance criteria established by the Board of Trustees are met and the recipient remains employed by the Company through the vesting date.

The Company measures compensation expense for time-based vesting restricted share awards based upon the fair market value of its common shares at the date of grant. For the performance-based shares granted in 2012, 2013 and 2014, compensation expense is based on a valuation of $10.20, $10.93 and $13.17, respectively, per performance share granted, which takes into account that some or all of the awards may not vest if long-term performance criteria are not met during the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company pays dividends on non-vested time-based restricted shares. Dividends for performance-based shares are accrued and paid annually only if and to the extent that long-term performance criteria established by the Board of Trustees are met and the recipient remains employed by the Company on the vesting date.

A summary of the Company’s restricted share awards for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:


	June 30, 2014					December 31, 2013					September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Number of Shares			Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares			Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at beginning of the period	$	158,035		$	12.39	$	140,077		$	12.70	158,035		$	12.39	140,077		$	12.70
Granted	87,018			17.46		81,658			13.43		87,018		17.46		81,658		13.43
Vested	(65,412		)	12.17		(63,700		)	14.39		(65,412	)	12.17		(63,700	)	14.39
Non-vested at end of the period	$	179,641		$	14.92	$	158,035		$	12.39	179,641		$	14.92	158,035		$	12.39

1517

Table of Contents

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were $~~2.1~~1.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted share awards. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, these costs were expected to be recognized over a weighted–average period of approximately ~~2.1~~1.9 years. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized approximately $0.3 million and $~~0.2~~0.3 million, respectively, and for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized approximately ~~$0.6~~$0.9 million and ~~$0.5~~$0.7 million, respectively, of expense related to the restricted share awards. This expense is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Units

The Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.2 million in compensation expense related to the LTIP units for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million in compensation expense related to the LTIP units for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was $~~0.6~~0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to LTIP units. This cost is expected to be recognized over approximately ~~0.9~~0.6 years, which represents the weighted average remaining vesting period of the LTIP units. Upon the closing of the Company's equity offering on September 30, 2013, the Company determined that a revaluation event occurred, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and 26,250 LTIP units of one of the officers of the Company achieved full parity with the common Operating Partnership units with respect to liquidating distributions and all other purposes. ~~Three-fifths~~Four-fifths of these units have vested as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. As of June 4, 2014, the Company determined that a revaluation event occurred, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and 231,525 LTIP units of the other two officers of the Company achieved full parity with the common Operating Partnership units with respect to liquidating distributions and all other purposes. Four-fifths of these units have vested ~~June~~as of September 30, 2014. Accordingly, these LTIP units will be allocated their pro-rata share of the Company's net income.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company or its properties.

Hotel Ground Rent

The Altoona hotel is subject to a ground lease with an expiration date of April 30, 2029 with an extension option of up to 12 additional terms of five years each. Monthly payments are determined by the quarterly average room occupancy of the hotel. Rent is equal to approximately $7,500 per month when monthly occupancy is less than 85% and can increase up to approximately $20,000 per month if occupancy is 100%, with minimum rent increased on an annual basis by two and one-half percent (2.5%).

At the New Rochelle Residence Inn, there is an air rights lease and garage lease that each expire on December 1, 2104. The lease agreements with the City of New Rochelle cover the space above the parking garage that is occupied by the hotel as well as 128 parking spaces in a parking garage that is attached to the hotel. The annual base rent for the garage lease is the hotel’s proportionate share of the city’s adopted budget for the operations, management and maintenance of the garage and established reserves to fund for the cost of capital repairs. Rent for 2014 is equal to approximately $29,000 per quarter.

Future minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancellable operating ground leases under which the Company is the lessee are expensed on a straight-line basis regardless of when payments are due. The following is a schedule of the minimum future obligation payments required under the ground, air rights and garages leases as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, for the remainder of 2014 and for each of the next four calendar years and thereafter (in thousands):


	Amount		Amount
2014 (remaining six months)	$	104
2014 (remaining three months)			$	52
2015	210		210
2016	212		212
2017	214		214
2018	217		217
Thereafter	11,228		11,228
Total	$	12,185	$	12,133

1618

Table of Contents

Management Agreements

The management agreements with Concord have an initial ten-year term that expires on February 28, 2017 and will renew automatically for successive one-year terms unless terminated by the TRS lessee or the manager by written notice to the other party no later than 90 days prior to the then current term’s expiration date. The management agreements may be terminated for cause, including the failure of the managed hotel ~~operating performance~~ to meet specified operating performance levels. If the Company were to terminate the management agreements during the first nine years of the term other than for breach or default by the manager, the Company would be responsible for paying termination fees to the manager.

The management agreements with IHM have an initial term of five years and may be renewed for two five-year periods at IHM’s option by written notice to us no later than 90 days prior to the then current term’s expiration date. The IHM management agreements provide for early termination at the Company’s option upon sale of any IHM-managed hotel for no termination fee, with six months advance notice. The IHM management agreements may be terminated for cause, including the failure of the managed hotel to meet specified performance levels.

Base management fees are calculated as a percentage of the hotel's gross room revenue. If certain financial thresholds are met or exceeded, an incentive management fee is calculated as 10% of the hotel's net operating income less fixed costs, base management fees and a specified return threshold. The incentive management fee is capped at 1% of gross hotel revenues for the applicable calculation.

1719

Table of Contents

Terms of the Company's management agreements ~~are:~~at September 30, 2014 are as follows:


Property	Management Company	Base Management Fee		Monthly Accounting Fee	Monthly Revenue Management Fee	Incentive Management Fee		Management Company	Base Management Fee		Monthly Accounting Fee	Monthly Revenue Management Fee	Incentive Management Fee
Courtyard Altoona	Concord	4.0	%	1,211	—	—	%	Concord	4.0	%	1,211	—	—	%
Springhill Suites Washington	Concord	4.0	%	991	—	—	%	Concord	4.0	%	991	—	—	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Boston-Billerica/ Bedford/ Burlington	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Minneapolis-Mall of America	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Nashville-Brentwood	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas-Market Center	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Hartford-Farmington	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Orlando-Maitland	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	2.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton Carlsbad (North San Diego County)	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Hampton Inn & Suites Houston-Medical Center	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn Long Island Holtsville	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn White Plains	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn New Rochelle	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn Garden Grove	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn Mission Valley	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Homewood Suites by Hilton San Antonio River Walk	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn Washington DC	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Residence Inn Tysons Corner	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%	IHM	2.5	%	1,000	—	1.0	%
Hampton Inn Portland Downtown	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Courtyard Houston	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,000	550	1.0	%
Hyatt Place Pittsburgh North Shore	IHM	3.0	%	1,500	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,500	1,000	1.0	%
Hampton Inn Exeter	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Hilton Garden Inn Denver Tech	IHM	3.0	%	1,500	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,500	1,000	1.0	%
Residence Inn Bellevue	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Springhill Suites Savannah	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Residence Inn Silicon Valley I	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Residence Inn Silicon Valley II	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Residence Inn San Mateo	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Residence Inn Mountain View	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%	IHM	3.0	%	1,200	1,000	1.0	%
Hyatt Place Cherry Creek								IHM	3.0	%	1,500	1,000	1.0	%

Management fees totaled approximately $~~1.4~~1.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately ~~$2.5~~$4.4 million and ~~$1.6~~$2.4 million, respectively, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013.

1820

Table of Contents

Franchise Agreements

The fees associated with the franchise agreements are calculated on the specified percentage of the hotel's gross room revenue. Terms of the Company's Franchise agreements ~~are:~~as of September 30, 2014 are as follows:


Property	Franchise/Royalty Fee		Marketing/Program Fee		Expiration	Franchise/Royalty Fee		Marketing/Program Fee		Expiration
Homewood Suites by Hilton Boston-Billerica/ Bedford/ Burlington	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025
Homewood Suites by Hilton Minneapolis-Mall of America	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025
Homewood Suites by Hilton Nashville-Brentwood	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025
Homewood Suites by Hilton Dallas-Market Center	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025
Homewood Suites by Hilton Hartford-Farmington	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025
Homewood Suites by Hilton Orlando-Maitland	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025	4.0	%	4.0	%	2025
Homewood Suites by Hilton Carlsbad (North San Diego County)	4.0	%	4.0	%	2028	4.0	%	4.0	%	2028
Hampton Inn & Suites Houston-Medical Center	5.0	%	4.0	%	2020	5.0	%	4.0	%	2020
Courtyard Altoona	5.5	%	2.0	%	2030	5.5	%	2.0	%	2030
Springhill Suites Washington	5.0	%	2.5	%	2030	5.0	%	2.5	%	2030
Residence Inn Long Island Holtsville	5.5	%	2.5	%	2025	5.5	%	2.5	%	2025
Residence Inn White Plains	5.5	%	2.5	%	2030	5.5	%	2.5	%	2030
Residence Inn New Rochelle	5.5	%	2.5	%	2030	5.5	%	2.5	%	2030
Residence Inn Garden Grove	5.0	%	2.5	%	2031	5.0	%	2.5	%	2031
Residence Inn Mission Valley	5.0	%	2.5	%	2031	5.0	%	2.5	%	2031
Homewood Suites by Hilton San Antonio River Walk	4.0	%	4.0	%	2026	4.0	%	4.0	%	2026
Residence Inn Washington DC	5.5	%	2.5	%	2033	5.5	%	2.5	%	2033
Residence Inn Tysons Corner	5.0	%	2.5	%	2031	5.0	%	2.5	%	2031
Hampton Inn Portland Downtown	6.0	%	4.0	%	2032	6.0	%	4.0	%	2032
Courtyard Houston	5.5	%	2.0	%	2030	5.5	%	2.0	%	2030
Hyatt Place Pittsburgh North Shore	5.0	%	3.5	%	2030	5.0	%	3.5	%	2030
Hampton Inn Exeter	6.0	%	4.0	%	2031	6.0	%	4.0	%	2031
Hilton Garden Inn Denver Tech	4.3	%	5.5	%	2028	4.3	%	5.5	%	2028
Residence Inn Bellevue	5.5	%	2.5	%	2033	5.5	%	2.5	%	2033
Springhill Suites Savannah	5.0	%	2.5	%	2033	5.0	%	2.5	%	2033
Residence Inn Silicon Valley I	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029
Residence Inn Silicon Valley II	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029
Residence Inn San Mateo	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029
Residence Inn Mountain View	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029	5.5	%	2.5	%	2029
Hyatt Place Cherry Creek						3-5.0%		3.5	%	2034

Franchise fees totaled approximately $~~3.6~~4.7 million and $~~2.2~~2.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately ~~$6.4~~$11.1 million and ~~$4.1~~$6.8 million, respectively, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013.

14. Related Party Transactions

Mr. Fisher owns 90% of IHM. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the Company had hotel management agreements with IHM to manage 2728 of its hotels. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, all 47 hotels owned by the NewINK JV are managed by IHM. Hotel management, revenue management and accounting fees paid to IHM for the ~~Chatham properties~~hotels owned by the Company for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $~~1.3~~1.8 million and $~~0.7~~1.0 million, respectively, and for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 were ~~$2.3~~$4.1 million and ~~$1.4~~$2.4 million, respectively. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the amounts due to IHM were $~~0.8~~0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities revenue represent reimbursements of costs incurred on behalf of the Innkeepers JV and NewINK JV. These costs relate primarily to corporate payroll costs at the JVs where the Company is the employer. As the Company records cost reimbursements based upon costs incurred with no added markup, the revenue and related expense has no impact on the Company’s operating income or net income. Cost reimbursements from the JVs are recorded based upon the occurrence of a reimbursed activity.

1921

Table of Contents

15. Subsequent Events

On ~~July 2,~~September 17, 2014, a new joint venture between the Company ~~obtained debt secured by~~and NorthStar entered into an agreement to purchase (the “Purchase Agreement”) from Inland, a ~~first~~52-hotel, 6,976 room portfolio of upscale extended stay and premium branded select service hotels for a cash purchase price of approximately $1.1 billion, plus customary pro-rated amounts and closing costs. The Company refers to this portfolio as the “Inland Portfolio” and to this acquisition as the “Inland JV Acquisition.” The Company expects that the joint venture will issue approximately $818.0 million (subject to adjustment if the Purchase Option as described below is exercised) of non-recourse mortgage onfinancing to fund a portion of the ~~Savannah Hotel of $30.0 million. The loan has a 10-year term and a 30-year amortization payment schedule but is interest only~~purchase price for the ~~first 60 months.~~ Inland Portfolio. Based on this anticipated amount of financing, the Company expects that its equity contribution to the purchase price for the Inland Portfolio will be approximately $28.0 million. Upon completion of the Inland JV Acquisition, NorthStar will own a 90% ownership interest in the Inland Portfolio and the Company will own the remaining 10% ownership interest.

The ~~interest rate on~~Inland Portfolio is comprised of high-quality brands, including the ~~loan~~Courtyard by Marriott® brand (18 hotels), the Residence Inn by Marriott® brand (14 hotels), the Hilton Garden Inn by Hilton® brand (eight hotels), the Homewood Suites by Hilton® brand (six hotels), Hampton Inn or Hampton Inn and Suites by Hilton® brand (two hotels), aloft by Starwood® brand (two hotels), the SpringHill Suites by Marriott® brand (one hotel) and the Hyatt Place® brand (one hotel). The Inland Portfolio is ~~4.62%~~located in 21 states, with concentrations in Texas (eleven hotels), New Jersey (six hotels), North Carolina (five hotels), New York (five hotels) and Virginia (four hotels). The Company has also signed a non-binding letter of intent with NorthStar pursuant to which it will negotiate an option to acquire from the joint venture four of the hotels included in the Inland Portfolio for a gross purchase price of approximately $107.0 million, plus customary pro-rated amounts and closing costs.

The Company expects the Inland JV Acquisition and its acquisition of four hotels from the Inland JV to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2014.

2022

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. In this report, we ~~used~~use the terms “the Company, “we” or “our” to refer to Chatham Lodging Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

The following information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of the lodging industry, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, cash flow and plans and objectives. These statements generally are characterized by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “continue,” “intend,” “should,” “may” or similar expressions. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Some factors that might cause such a difference include the following: the local, national and global economic conditions, increased direct competition, changes in government regulations or accounting rules, changes in local, national and global real estate conditions, declines in lodging industry fundamentals, increased operating costs, seasonality of the lodging industry, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing on satisfactory terms, changes in interest rates, our ability to identify suitable investments, our ability to close on identified investments and inaccuracies of our accounting estimates. Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as updated elsewhere in Part II, Item 1A of this ~~report.~~report in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2014 and in the Company's Current Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2014.

Overview

We are a self-advised hotel investment company organized in October 2009 that commenced operations in April 2010. Our investment strategy is to invest in premium-branded upscale extended-stay and select-service hotels in geographically diverse markets with high barriers to entry near strong demand generators. We may acquire portfolios of hotels or single hotels. We expect that a significant portion of our portfolio will consist of hotels in the upscale extended-stay or select-service categories, including brands such as Homewood Suites by Hilton^®, Residence Inn by Marriott^®, Hyatt Place^®, Courtyard by Marriott^®, Hilton Garden Inn by Hilton^®, Hampton Inn^® and Hampton Inn and Suites^®.

Our long-term goal is to maintain our leverage at a ratio of net debt to investment in hotels (at cost) at levels lower than current levels. However, we and our Board of Trustees are comfortable at levels in excess of current levels at this point of the hotel economic cycle especially given the borrowing rates available in today's credit markets. This provides us with balance sheet flexibility to use debt to fund external growth via acquisitions. Our leverage ratio at ~~June~~September 30, 2014 is ~~51%~~37.5%, which is up from 36% at December 31, 2013.

Future growth through acquisitions could be funded by issuances of both common and preferred shares or the issuance of partnership interests in our Operating Partnership, draw-downs under our senior secured revolving credit facility, the incurrence or assumption of debt, available cash, proceeds from dispositions of assets or distributions from our 10.3% investment in a new joint venture with affiliates of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (“NorthStar”) that owns 47 hotels (the "NewINK JV"), or distributions from our 5.0% investment in a joint venture with Cerberus Capital Management ("Cerberus") that owns the Residence Inn by Marriott in Torrance, CA (the "Torrance JV"). We intend to acquire quality assets at attractive prices, improve their returns through knowledgeable asset management and seasoned, proven hotel management while remaining prudently leveraged.

We believe the remainder of 2014 and beyond will offer attractive growth for the lodging industry and for us because lodging demand is projected to surpass supply growth for the next few years. Increased demand is correlative to economic growth in the U.S. and with Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) expected to moderately grow, we believe demand will increase.

2123

Table of Contents

We ~~elected to qualify for treatment as~~are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), we cannot operate our hotels. Therefore, our operating partnership, Chatham Lodging, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), and its subsidiaries lease our hotel properties to taxable REIT lessee subsidiaries (“TRS Lessees”), who ~~will~~ in turn engage eligible independent contractors to manage the hotels. Each of these lessees is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes and is consolidated within our financial statements for accounting purposes. However, since we control both the Operating Partnership and the TRS Lessees, our principal source of funds on a consolidated basis is from the operations of our hotels. The earnings of the TRS Lessees are subject to taxation as regular C corporations, as defined in the Code, potentially reducing the TRS Lessees’ cash available to pay dividends to us, and therefore our funds from operations and the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

Recent Developments

On ~~June 9,~~September 17, 2014, ~~the Company completed the sale of its joint venture with Cerberus, the Innkeepers JV, which owned a 51-hotel, 6,848-room portfolio, to~~ a new joint venture between ~~affiliates~~the Company and NorthStar entered into an agreement to purchase (the “Purchase Agreement”) from Inland, a 52-hotel, 6,976 room portfolio of upscale extended stay and premium branded select service hotels for a cash purchase price of approximately $1.1 billion, plus customary pro-rated amounts and closing costs. The Company refers to this portfolio as the “Inland Portfolio” and to this acquisition as the “Inland JV Acquisition.” The Company expects that the joint venture will issue approximately $860.0 million (subject to adjustment if the Purchase Option as described below is exercised) of non-recourse mortgage financing to fund a portion of the purchase price for the Inland Portfolio. Based on this anticipated amount of financing, the Company expects that its equity contribution to the purchase price for the Inland Portfolio will be approximately $29.0 million. Upon completion of the Inland JV Acquisition, NorthStar will own a 90% ownership interest in the Inland Portfolio and the ~~Company’s operating partnership (the “NewINK JV”)~~Company will own the remaining 10% ownership interest.

The Inland Portfolio is comprised of high-quality brands, including the Courtyard by Marriott® brand (18 hotels), the Residence Inn by Marriott® brand (14 hotels), the Hilton Garden Inn by Hilton® brand (eight hotels), the Homewood Suites by Hilton® brand (six hotels), Hampton Inn or Hampton Inn and Suites by Hilton® brand (two hotels), aloft by Starwood® brand (two hotels), the SpringHill Suites by Marriott® brand (one hotel) and the Hyatt Place® brand (one hotel). The Inland Portfolio is located in 21 states, with concentrations in Texas (eleven hotels), New Jersey (six hotels), North Carolina (five hotels), New York (five hotels) and Virginia (four hotels). The Company has also signed a non-binding letter of intent with NorthStar pursuant to which ~~NorthStar effectively acquired Cerberus' 89.7% interest in 47~~it will negotiate an option to acquire from the joint venture four of the 51hotels included in the Inland Portfolio.

The Company expects the Inland JV Acquisition and its acquisition of four hotels from the ~~Innkeepers JV. The remaining~~Inland JV to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2014.

On September 24, 2014, the Company completed a follow-on common share offering of 6,900,000 shares (including 900,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares) generating gross proceeds of $150.8 million and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $144.7 million. Proceeds from the September offering were used to pay down borrowings under the Company's senior secured revolving credit facility, including debt incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Cherry Creek Hyatt Place hotel in Glendale, CO (the "Cherry Creek Hotel") and to invest in additional hotel properties, including the Company's equity contribution towards the purchase price for the acquisition of a 52-hotel portfolio from Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. by a joint venture (the "Inland JV") with NorthStar Realty Finance Corp ("NorthStar") and the potential acquisition of four hotels ~~each of~~by us from the joint venture for which we have an option to purchase (included within the 52 hotels) which is ~~a Residence Inn that are located in Silicon Valley, California, were purchased by the Company. The Company owns a 10.3% interest~~expected to close in the ~~NewINK JV, which owns 47 hotels comprising an aggregate~~fourth quarter of 6,097 rooms. The Company accounts for this investment under the equity method. The remeasurement gain of the Company's interest in the four Silicon Valley Hotels as a result of the step acquisition was approximately $18.8 million and the net gain from the Company's promote interest in the Innkeepers JV was approximately $47.9 million (credited toward the purchase of the Silicon Valley Hotels), resulting in a total gain of $66.7 million from the transaction. The Company's gain resulting from this transaction will be rolled tax deferred between the basis of the Company's investment in the NewINK JV and the Company's basis in the four Silicon Valley Hotels. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and ~~2013, the Company received no cash distributions from the NewINK JV.~~

2014.

Financial Condition and Operating Performance Metrics

We measure financial condition and hotel operating performance by evaluating financial metrics and measures such as:

Revenue Per Available Room (“RevPAR”),

Average Daily Rate (“ADR”),

Occupancy percentage,

Funds From Operations (“FFO”),

Adjusted FFO,

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), and

Adjusted EBITDA.

Table of Contents

We evaluate the hotels in our portfolio and potential acquisitions using these metrics to determine each hotel’s contribution toward providing income to our shareholders through increases in distributable cash flow and increasing long-term total returns through appreciation in the value of our common shares. RevPAR, ADR and Occupancy are hotel industry measures commonly used to evaluate operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as total room revenue divided by total number of available rooms, is an important metric for monitoring hotel operating performance, and more specifically hotel revenue.

“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” provides a detailed discussion of our use of FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income or loss, measurements recognized by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”).

~~Table of Contents~~

Results of Operations

Industry outlook

We believe that the hotel industry’s performance is correlated to the performance of the economy overall, and specifically, key economic indicators such as GDP growth, employment trends, corporate travel and corporate profits. We expect a continuing improvement in the performance of the hotel industry as GDP is currently forecast to grow ~~approximately 2.1%~~in a range of 2.0% to ~~2.3%~~2.2% in 2014, unemployment is forecast to continue to decline and corporate profits and travel ~~expense~~expenses are expected to continue to rise. As reported by Smith Travel Research, monthly industry RevPAR has been higher year over year since March 2010, so we are into the 5th year of RevPAR growth in what some believe will be a ~~larger~~longer cycle. As a comparison, ~~the period~~ from 1992 to 2000, the industry saw nine consecutive years of RevPAR growth and from 2003 to 2007 the industry saw 5 consecutive years of RevPAR growth. As reported by Smith Travel Research, industry RevPAR in 2013 was up 5.6% and was up ~~7.5%~~8.2% year to date through ~~June~~September 30, 2014 compared to the same periods in the respective prior year. Industry analysts such as Smith Travel Research and PKF Hospitality are projecting industry RevPAR to grow approximately 6% in 2014 based on sustained economic growth, lack of new supply and increased business travel spending. Of the projected growth, industry analysts believe growth in ADR will comprise the majority of the expected RevPAR growth. Primary hotel franchisors Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt and Starwood are projecting fourth quarter 2014 and 2015 RevPAR growth in North America in a range of ~~6-7%~~5-7%. We are currently projecting RevPAR at our hotels to grow ~~6.5%~~5.5% to 7.5% in 2014 with ADR growth comprising approximately 60% of our projected RevPAR growth. Looking further ahead to 2015, Smith Travel Research and PKF Hospitality predict that RevPAR will continue to grow in 2015 with preliminary estimates between 4.9% and ~~7.5%~~6.7%.

Comparison of the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 to the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

Results of operations for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 include the operating activities of our 2930 wholly-owned hotels and our investments in the NewINK JV ~~Innkeepers JV~~ and the Torrance JV. We owned 2123 hotels at ~~June~~September 30, 2013. and owned a 10.3% joint venture interest in the Innkeepers JV and a 5.0% interest in the Torrance JV. Accordingly, the comparisons below are influenced by the fact that ~~eight~~nine hotels ~~and the Torrance JV~~ were not owned by us for all of the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013. Four hotels were acquired during the second half of 2013, ~~and~~ four hotels in the Silicon Valley, CA area were acquired on June 9, 2014 and one hotel in Glendale, CO was acquired on August 29, 2014.

As reported by Smith Travel Research, industry RevPAR for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 was up ~~8.2%~~9.2% and up ~~5.0%~~5.5%, respectively, as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter for 2013 and 2012. RevPAR at our hotels, excluding the Cherry Creek Hotel, which was acquired on August 29, 2014 and only re-commenced operations in October 2013, was up ~~9.6%~~10.5% and ~~3.5%~~3.8%, respectively, in the third quarter of 2014 and 2013 ~~periods~~ as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013 and 2012. The ~~second~~third quarter of 2013 was adversely impacted by renovations that occurred at our Washington, D.C. hotel, which operated without a brand for most of the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013 until it was rebranded to a Residence Inn by Marriott on September 20, 2013.

Table of Contents

Revenues

Revenue consists of the following (in thousands):


	For the three months ended						For the three months ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% Change		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013		% Change
Room	$	43,978	$	28,960	51.9	%	$	57,482	$	33,182	73.2	%
Food and beverage	585		199		194.0	%	666		368		81.0	%
Other	2,021		1,202		68.1	%	2,098		1,362		54.0	%
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities	493		385		28.1	%	416		458		(9.2	)%
Total revenue	$	47,077	$	30,746	53.1	%	$	60,662	$	35,370	71.5	%

Total revenue was ~~$47.1~~$60.7 million for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, up ~~$16.4~~$25.3 million compared to total revenue of ~~$30.7~~$35.4 million for the 2013 period. Total revenue related to the four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 contributed ~~$8.1~~$8.4 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in 2014 contributed ~~$3.1~~$13.7 million of the increase. Since all of our hotels are select service or limited service hotels, room revenue is the primary revenue source as these hotels do not have significant food and beverage revenue or large group conference facilities. Room revenue was ~~$44.0~~$57.5 million and ~~$29.0~~$33.2 million for the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, with $~~7.0~~7.7 million of this increase attributable to the four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 and ~~$3.0~~$13.5 million attributable to the four hotels in Silicon Valley ~~hotels~~and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014. For the 21 comparable hotels owned by us throughout both the 2014 and 2013 periods, room revenue was up ~~$4.6~~$3.1 million, or ~~15.9%~~9.5%, driven primarily by RevPAR growth of ~~9.6%~~9.4%.

Food and beverage revenue was $~~0.6~~0.7 million and $~~0.2~~0.4 million for three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase relates to the ~~Hyatt Place Pittsburgh Hotel~~Denver Tech and Cherry Creek Hotels. The Denver Tech hotel was acquired in September 2013 and the ~~Denver Tech~~Cherry Creek Hotel ~~which were~~was acquired ~~during or after the second quarter of 2013~~in August 2014 and have food and beverage operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

Other operating revenue, comprised of meeting room, gift shop, in-room movie and other ancillary amenities revenue, was ~~$2.0~~$2.1 million and ~~$1.2~~$1.4 million for the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total other operating revenue related to the four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 contributed $0.5 million of the increase ~~with~~and the ~~remaining increase~~four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel contributed $0.2 million of ~~$0.3 million attributable to~~ the ~~21 comparable hotels.~~increase.

Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities, comprised of payroll costs at the Innkeepers JV and NewINK JVs where the Company is the employer, were ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. ~~The increase is due to higher annual incentive compensation for dedicated joint venture employees.~~

Since room revenue is the primary component of total revenue, our revenue results are dependent on maintaining and improving hotel occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at our hotels. Occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR results for the 29 wholly owned hotels are presented in the following table in each period to reflect operation of the hotels regardless of our ownership interest during the periods ~~presented:~~presented. Operations at the Cherry Creek Hotel did not begin until October 2013 and for this reason have been excluded form the results below:


	For the three months ended			For the three months ended			For the three months ended			For the three months ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013			September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
Occupancy	86.8		%	83.7		%	88.1		%	85.7		%
ADR	$	153.71		$	145.46		$	160.44		$	149.57
RevPar	$	133.37		$	121.73		$	141.82		$	128.24

The RevPar increase of ~~9.6%~~10.5% was due to an increase in ADR of ~~5.7%~~7.6% and an increase in occupancy of ~~3.7%~~2.8%. Occupancy at the D.C. hotel increased ~~34.4%~~47.5% in the 2014 ~~second~~third quarter over the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013. The D.C. Hotel was rebranded to a Marriott Residence Inn in September 20, 2013.

Table of Contents

Hotel Operating Expenses

Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands):


	For the three months ended						For the three months ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% Change		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013		% Change
Hotel operating expenses:
Room	$	8,802	$	6,065	45.1	%	$	10,672	$	6,845	55.9	%
Food and beverage	432		182		137.4	%	487		189		157.7	%
Telephone	285		216		31.9	%	356		236		50.8	%
Other	507		378		34.1	%	609		430		41.6	%
General and administrative	3,847		2,680		43.5	%	4,439		3,159		40.5	%
Franchise and marketing fees	3,602		2,243		60.6	%	4,694		2,663		76.3	%
Advertising and promotions	859		651		32.0	%	1,059		738		43.5	%
Utilities	1,482		1,117		32.7	%	2,148		1,492		44.0	%
Repairs and maintenance	2,057		1,556		32.2	%	2,363		1,710		38.2	%
Management fees	1,396		887		57.4	%	1,883		947		98.8	%
Insurance	217		176		23.3	%	273		192		42.2	%
Total hotel operating expenses	$	23,486	$	16,151	45.4	%	$	28,983	$	18,601	55.8	%

Hotel operating expenses increased ~~$7.3~~$10.4 million to ~~$23.5~~$29.0 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 from ~~$16.2~~$18.6 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. Total hotel operating expenses related to the four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 contributed $4.0 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$0.9~~$5.2 million of the increase. For the 21 comparable hotels, total hotel operating expenses increased ~~$2.4~~$1.2 million or ~~14.9%~~6.4%.

~~Table of Contents~~

Room expenses, which are the most significant component of hotel operating expenses, increased ~~$2.7~~$3.9 million or 55.9% from ~~$6.1~~$6.8 million in 2013 to ~~$8.8~~$10.7 million in the third quarter of 2014. This compares to a 73.2% increase in room revenue over the same period in 2013 and as a percentage of room revenue, room expenses decreased from 20.6% in the third quarter of 2013 to 18.6% in 2014. Total room expenses related to the four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 contributed $1.4 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$0.3~~$1.8 million of the increase. For the 21 comparable hotels, total room operating expenses increased ~~$1.0~~$0.7 million or ~~16.5%~~9.2% the third quarter of 2014. Expenses increased due to increased occupancy related expenses and other direct expenses that vary with revenue. ~~Accordingly, room expenses increased 45.1% compared to the 51.9% increase in room revenue in the year over year period.~~

The remaining hotel operating expenses increased ~~$4.6~~$6.5 million, from ~~$10.1~~$11.8 million in the third quarter of 2013 to ~~$14.7~~$18.3 million in the third quarter of 2014, which ~~45.6%~~55.8% increase is generally consistent with the increase in the number of rooms owned in 2014 compared to 2013 of ~~49.3%~~41.9%. The number of rooms for the quarter increased from ~~2,909~~3,200 rooms in 2013 to ~~4,342~~4,540 rooms in 2014 due to acquisitions. The increase in remaining hotel operating expenses attributable to the ~~recent acquisitions is $3.2~~four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 contributed $2.6 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in 2014 contributed $3.5 million. Food and beverage expense increased due to the ~~Hyatt Place Pittsburgh and~~ Denver Tech ~~hotels~~hotel that ~~were~~was acquired during ~~or after~~ the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013 and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in the third quarter of 2014, each of which have food and beverage operations whereas most of our other hotels have limited for sale food and beverage activities.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased ~~$3.4~~$5.6 million from ~~$4.0~~$4.7 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$7.4~~$10.3 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The increase is due to the four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013, which contributed ~~$1.5~~$1.4 million of the increase, while the four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$1.0~~$4.0 million of the increase. The remaining increase is attributable to renovations performed in 2013 and 2014. Depreciation is recorded on our hotel buildings up to 40 years from the date of acquisition. Depreciable lives of hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally three to ten years between the date of acquisition and the date that the furniture, fixtures and equipment will be replaced. Amortization of franchise fees is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective franchise agreement.

Table of Contents

Property Taxes and Insurance

Total property taxes and insurance expenses increased ~~$0.8~~$1.1 million from ~~$2.0~~$2.2 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$2.8~~$3.3 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The four hotels acquired in the second half of 2013 contributed $0.3 million of the increase, while the four hotels in Silicon Valley and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$0.2~~$0.6 million of the increase.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses principally consist of employee-related costs, including base payroll, bonuses and amortization of restricted stock and awards of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units. These expenses also include corporate operating costs, professional fees and trustees’ fees. Total general and administrative expenses (excluding amortization of stock based compensation of $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively) increased ~~$0.4~~$0.7 million to ~~$1.9~~$2.1 million in 2014 from ~~$1.5~~$1.4 million in 2013, with the increase due to higher employee ~~compensation.~~compensation of $0.5 million related to employee incentive compensation and a $0.2 million increase in franchise or state registration taxes.

Hotel Property Acquisition Costs and Other Charges

Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges ~~increased $4.5~~decreased $1.0 million from $~~1.1~~1.3 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$5.6~~$0.3 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Hotel property acquisition costs of ~~$4.8~~$0.3 million in the 2014 period related to our acquisitions of the four recently acquired Silicon Valley ~~hotels.~~hotels and the Cherry Creek Hotel. Acquisition-related costs are expensed when incurred. The Company incurred other charges of $0.7 million in the 2014 period related to matters associated with the unsolicited offer from Blue Mountain Capital Management and matters related to its proxy settlement agreement with the HG Vora Group. The expense is primarily comprised of attorney's fees of $0.6 million and financial advisory expenses of $0.1 million.

Reimbursed Costs from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

Reimbursed costs from unconsolidated real estate entities, comprised of corporate payroll costs at the Innkeepers and NewINK JVs where the Company is the employer were ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million for the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These costs were offset by the cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities included in revenues.

~~Table of Contents~~

Interest and Other Income

Interest on cash and cash equivalents and other income ~~decreased $98~~increased $53 thousand from ~~$0.1 million for the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~to $12~~$9 thousand for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to $62 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Interest Expense, including amortization of deferred fees

Interest expense increased ~~$1.6~~$3.9 million from $2.8 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$4.4~~$6.7 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and is comprised of the following (in thousands):


	For the three months ended						For the three months ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% Change		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013		% Change

Mortgage debt interest	$	3,367	$	1,945	73.1	%	$	5,720	$	2,234	156.0	%
Credit facility interest and unused fees	640		624		2.6	%	606		288		110.4	%
Amortization of deferred financing costs	355		248		43.1	%	388		253		53.4	%
Total	$	4,362	$	2,817	54.8	%	$	6,714	$	2,775	141.9	%

The increase in interest expense for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 is due to interest expense of ~~$1.5~~$3.0 million on loans ~~acquired during~~issued after the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013 ~~and after June 30, 2013~~ of ~~$293.8~~$336.6 million, including the four new loans having an aggregate principal balance of $222.0 million on the four Silicon Valley hotels ~~acquired~~issued on June 9, 2014 and $30.0 million on the Savannah hotel issued on July 2, 2014. The increase in deferred financing costs relates to the new loans issued after the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013. Credit facility interest increased due to higher average weighted borrowings of $68.9 million in 2014 compared to $27.8 million in 2013.

~~Loss~~

Table of Contents

Income (loss) from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

~~Loss~~Income (loss) from unconsolidated real estate entities increased ~~$1.9~~$1.5 million from a loss of ~~$0.1~~$0.7 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~a loss~~income of ~~$2.0~~$0.8 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The increase is due to ~~costs related to the sale of the Innkeepers JV to NewINK JV.~~

~~Gain on Sale from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities~~

~~Gain on sales from unconsolidated real estate entities increased $66.7 million from 2013. The increase is~~better operating results as well as lower interest and lower depreciation expense due to ~~the sale~~lower asset values as a result of ~~Cerberus' 89.7% interest in 51~~fewer hotels in the NewINK JV as compared to the Innkeepers JV. ~~The gain includes the Company's pro rata share of a promote interest.~~

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense ~~decreased $7~~increased $14 thousand from ~~$45~~$30 thousand for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$38~~$44 thousand for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. We are subject to income taxes based on the taxable income of our taxable REIT subsidiary holding companies at a combined federal and state tax rate of approximately 40%.

Net income

Net income was ~~$65.3~~$8.7 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to net income of ~~$2.2~~$2.5 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The net income was due to the factors discussed above.

Material Trends or Uncertainties

We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either the capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of properties, loans and other permitted investments, other than those referred to in the risk factors identified in the “Risk Factors” section of this report, ~~and~~ our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Comparison of~~, in the ~~six months~~Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2014.

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013

Results of operations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 include the operating activities of our 2930 wholly-owned hotels and our investments in the NewINK JV (from June 9, 2014 to September 30, 2014), Innkeepers JV (from January 1, 2014 to June 8, 2014) and the Torrance JV. We owned 19 hotels and a 10.3% interest in the Innkeepers JV at December 31, 2012. Accordingly, the comparisons below are influenced by the fact that six hotels and the Torrance JV were acquired during 2013, ~~and~~ four hotels in the Silicon Valley, CA area were acquired on June 9, 2014 and the Cherry Creek Hotel in Glendale, CO was acquired on August 29, 2014.

As reported by Smith Travel Research, industry RevPAR for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 was up ~~6.8%~~8.2% and up 5.6%, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2013 and 2012. RevPAR at our hotels was up ~~8.9%~~9.4% and ~~4.0%~~4.2%, respectively, in the 2014 and 2013 periods as compared to 2013 and 2012. Our RevPAR performance in 2013 was adversely impacted by renovations that occurred at our Washington, D.C. hotel, which operated without a brand for ~~eight~~nearly nine months in 2013 until it was rebranded to a Residence Inn by Marriott on September 20, 2013.

Revenues

Revenue consists of the following (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% Change		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013		% Change
Room	$	77,935	$	53,195	46.5	%	$	135,417	$	86,377	56.8	%
Food and beverage	1,213		349		247.6	%	1,879		717		162.1	%
Other	3,629		2,213		64.0	%	5,727		3,575		60.2	%
Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities	1,165		768		51.7	%	1,581		1,226		29.0	%
Total revenue	$	83,942	$	56,525	48.5	%	$	144,604	$	91,895	57.4	%

Table of Contents

Total revenue was ~~$83.9~~$144.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, up ~~$27.4~~$52.7 million compared to total revenue of ~~$56.5~~$91.9 million for the 2013 period. Total revenue related to the ~~four~~six hotels acquired during ~~the second half of~~ 2013 contributed ~~$14.7~~$27.6 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired ~~in June~~during 2014 contributed ~~$3.1~~$16.8 million of the increase. Since all of our hotels are select service or limited service hotels, room revenue is the primary revenue source as these hotels do not have significant food and beverage revenue or large group conference facilities. Room revenue was ~~$77.9~~$135.4 million and ~~$53.2~~$86.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, with ~~$13.2~~$25.0 million of this increase attributable to the ~~four~~six hotels acquired during ~~the second half of~~ 2013 and ~~$3.0~~$16.5 million attributable to the four Silicon Valley ~~hotels.~~hotels and Cherry Creek Hotel. For the 2119 comparable hotels, room revenue was up ~~$8.5~~$7.5 million, or ~~15.9%~~9.5%, driven primarily by RevPAR growth of ~~8.9%~~9.5%.

Food and beverage revenue was ~~$1.2~~$1.9 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.7 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase relates to the Hyatt Place Pittsburgh Hotel, the Houston Courtyard ~~hotel and~~Hotel, the Denver Tech ~~hotel,~~Hotel and Cherry Creek Hotel, which were acquired during or after the first quarter of 2013 and have food and beverage operations.

Other operating revenue, comprised of meeting room, gift shop, in-room movie and other ancillary amenities revenue, was ~~$3.6~~$5.7 million and ~~$2.2~~$3.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total other operating revenue related to the ~~eight~~six hotels ~~not owned at June 30,~~acquired during 2013 contributed ~~$0.9~~$1.4 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in 2014 contributed $0.2 million with the remaining increase of ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million attributable to increased ~~occupancy and $0.2 million attributable to Hyatt Place Pittsburgh that was acquired on June 17, 2013.~~occupancy.

Cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities, comprised of payroll costs at the Innkeepers and NewINK JVs where the Company is the employer, were ~~$1.2~~$1.6 million and ~~$0.8~~$1.2 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase is due to higher annual incentive compensation for dedicated joint venture employees.

~~Table of Contents~~


	For the six months ended			For the six months ended			For the nine months ended			For the nine months ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013			September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
Occupancy	82.3		%	79.2		%	84.3		%	81.4		%
ADR	$	149.65		$	142.80		$	153.65		$	145.20
RevPar	$	123.13		$	113.10		$	129.47		$	118.23

The RevPAR increase of ~~8.9%~~9.4% was due to an increase in ADR of ~~4.8%~~5.8% and an increase in occupancy of ~~3.9%~~3.5%. Occupancy at the D.C. hotel increased ~~38.9%~~43.6% in 2014 over 2013. Excluding the D.C. hotel, 2014 RevPAR was up ~~7.6%~~8.0%.

Table of Contents

Hotel Operating Expenses

Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% Change		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013		% Change
Hotel operating expenses:
Room	$	16,557	$	11,615	42.5	%	$	27,229	$	18,460	47.5	%
Food and beverage	899		317		183.6	%	1,386		506		173.9	%
Telephone	572		407		40.5	%	929		643		44.5	%
Other	950		727		30.7	%	1,559		1,157		34.7	%
General and administrative	7,274		5,186		40.3	%	11,712		8,493		37.9	%
Franchise and marketing fees	6,394		4,144		54.3	%	11,088		6,807		62.9	%
Advertising and promotions	1,689		1,308		29.1	%	2,749		2,046		34.4	%
Utilities	3,102		2,183		42.1	%	5,250		3,675		42.9	%
Repairs and maintenance	4,056		3,001		35.2	%	6,419		4,711		36.3	%
Management fees	2,490		1,631		52.7	%	4,373		2,430		80.0	%
Insurance	433		348		24.4	%	706		540		30.7	%
Total hotel operating expenses	$	44,416	$	30,867	43.9	%	$	73,400	$	49,468	48.4	%

Hotel operating expenses increased ~~$13.5~~$23.9 million to ~~$44.4~~$73.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 from ~~$30.9~~$49.5 million in 2013. Total hotel operating expenses related to the ~~four~~six hotels acquired during ~~the second half of~~ 2013 contributed ~~$7.7~~$14.1 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$1.0~~$6.2 million of the increase. For the 2119 comparable hotels, total hotel operating expenses increased ~~$4.8~~$3.6 million or ~~15.8%~~8.0%.

Room expenses, which are the most significant component of hotel operating expenses, increased ~~$4.9~~$8.7 million from ~~$11.6~~$18.5 million in 2013 to ~~$16.5~~$27.2 million in ~~2014~~.2014. Total room expenses related to the ~~four~~six hotels acquired during ~~the second half of~~ 2013 contributed ~~$2.7~~$5.1 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$0.3~~$2.1 million of the increase. For the 2119 comparable hotels, total room operating expenses increased ~~$1.9~~$1.5 million or ~~16.4%~~9.2%. Expenses increased due to increased occupancy related expenses and other direct expenses that vary with revenue. Accordingly, room expenses increased ~~42.5%~~47.5% compared to the ~~46.5%~~58.6% increase in room revenue.

The remaining hotel operating expenses increased ~~$8.6~~$15.1 million, from ~~$19.3~~$31.0 million in 2013 to ~~$27.9~~$46.1 million in 2014,, which ~~44.7%~~48.9% increase is consistent with the increase in the number of rooms owned in 2014 compared to 2013 of ~~49.3%~~41.9%. The number of rooms for the year increased from ~~2,909~~3,200 rooms in 2013 to ~~4,342~~4,540 rooms in 2014 due to acquisitions. The increase in remaining hotel operating expenses attributable to the ~~recent~~ acquisitions ~~is $5.6~~since the second half of 2013 of $11.7 million. Food and beverage expense increased due to the Hyatt Place Pittsburgh, Houston Courtyard, ~~and~~ Denver Tech and Cherry Creek hotels that were acquired during or after the first quarter of 2013 and have food and beverage operations where as most of our other hotels have limited for sale food and beverage activities.

~~Table of Contents~~

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased ~~$5.9~~$11.5 million from ~~$7.8~~$12.5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$13.7~~$24.0 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The increase is due to the ~~four~~six hotels acquired during ~~the second half of~~ 2013, which contributed ~~$2.9~~$5.1 million of the increase, while the four hotels in Silicon Valley and Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 ~~which~~ contributed ~~$1.0~~$5.0 million of the increase. The remaining increase is attributable to renovations performed in 2013 and 2014. Depreciation is recorded on our hotel buildings up to 40 years from the date of acquisition. Depreciable lives of hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally three to ten years between the date of acquisition and the date that the furniture, fixtures and equipment will be replaced. Amortization of franchise fees is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective franchise agreement.

Table of Contents

Property Taxes and Insurance

Total property taxes and insurance expenses increased ~~$1.4~~$2.4 million from ~~$4.0~~$6.3 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$5.4~~$8.7 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The ~~four~~six hotels acquired during ~~the second half of~~ 2013 contributed ~~$0.6~~$1.3 million of the increase and the four hotels in Silicon Valley and the Cherry Creek Hotel acquired in ~~June~~ 2014 contributed ~~$0.2~~$0.8 million of the increase. The remainder of the increase of $0.3 million is for increased values at the 2119 comparable hotels.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses principally consist of employee-related costs, including base payroll, bonuses and amortization of restricted stock and awards of long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) units. These expenses also include corporate operating costs, professional fees and trustees’ fees. Total general and administrative expenses (excluding amortization of stock based compensation of ~~$1.2~~$1.8 million and ~~$1.0~~$1.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively) increased ~~$0.5~~$1.2 million to ~~$3.5~~$5.6 million in 2014 from ~~$3.0~~$4.4 million in 2013 with the increase due to higher employee compensation of $1.0 million associated with additional employees, base salary and incentive ~~compensation.~~compensation and $0.2 million increase in franchise and state registration taxes.

Hotel Property Acquisition Costs and Other Charges

Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges increased ~~$5.8~~$4.8 million from ~~$1.2~~$2.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$7.0~~$7.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Hotel property acquisition cost of ~~$4.8~~$5.0 million in the 2014 period related to our acquisitions of the four ~~recently acquired~~ Silicon Valley ~~hotels.~~hotels and the Cherry Creek Hotel as well as costs related to the NewINK JV transaction. Acquisition-related costs are expensed when incurred. The Company incurred other charges of $1.9 million in the 2014 period related to matters associated with the unsolicited offer from Blue Mountain Capital Management and matters related to its proxy settlement agreement with the HG Vora Group. The expense is primarily comprised of attorney's fees of $1.0 million and financial advisory expenses of $0.9 million.

Reimbursed Costs from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

Reimbursed costs from unconsolidated real estate entities, comprised of corporate payroll costs at the Innkeepers and NewINK JVs where the Company is the employer were ~~$1.2~~$1.6 million and ~~$0.8~~$1.2 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These costs were offset by the cost reimbursements from unconsolidated real estate entities included in revenues.

Interest and Other Income

Interest on cash and cash equivalents and other income decreased ~~$89~~$35 thousand from ~~$0.1 million~~$124 thousand for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$26~~$89 thousand for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

~~Table of Contents~~

Interest Expense, including amortization of deferred fees

Interest expense increased ~~$2.4~~$6.4 million from ~~$5.7~~$8.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$8.1~~$14.8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 due to increased borrowings necessary to fund our acquisitions in 2013 and 2014 and is comprised of the following (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2014		June 30, 2013		% Change		September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013		% Change

Mortgage debt interest	$	6,190	$	3,847	60.9	%	$	11,910	$	6,081	95.9	%
Credit facility interest and unused fees	1,161		1,255		(7.5	)%	1,768		1,543		14.6	%
Amortization of deferred financing costs	749		556		34.7	%	1,137		809		40.5	%
Total	$	8,100	$	5,658	43.2	%	$	14,815	$	8,433	75.7	%

Table of Contents

The increase in interest expense for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 is due to interest expense of ~~$2.3~~$5.4 million on loans ~~acquired during June~~issued in 2013 and ~~after June 30, 2013~~2014 of ~~$293.8~~$343.8 million, including the four new loans with an aggregate principal balance of $222.0 million secured by the four Silicon Valley hotels ~~acquired on June 9,~~and a new loan of $30.0 million secured by the Savannah hotel issued July 2, 2014. ~~Lower~~Higher credit facility interest is due to ~~a decrease~~an increase in the weighted average borrowings ~~to $66.6~~of $67.4 million in 2014 compared to ~~$80.8~~$62.9 million in 2013. The increase in deferred financing costs relates to the new loans issued in 2013 and 2014.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

Loss on early extinguishment of debt decreased $0.7 million from $0.9 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to $0.2 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 due to refinancing or paying off four loans in 2013 and one loan in 2014.

~~Loss~~Income (loss) from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

~~Loss~~Income (loss) from unconsolidated real estate entities ~~increased $1.6 million from~~was relatively in line with a loss of ~~$0.7~~$1.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 toversus a loss of ~~$2.3~~$1.5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. ~~The increase is due to costs related to the sale of the Innkeepers JV to NewINK JV.~~

Gain on Sale from Unconsolidated Real Estate Entities

Gain on sales from unconsolidated real estate entities increased $66.7 million from 2013. The increase is due to the sale of Cerberus' 89.7% interest in 51 hotels in the Innkeepers JV. ~~The gain includes the Company's pro rata share of a promote interest.~~

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense ~~decreased $4~~increased $10 thousand from ~~$45~~$75 thousand for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 to ~~$41~~$85 thousand for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. We are subject to income taxes based on the taxable income of our taxable REIT subsidiary holding companies at a combined federal and state tax rate of approximately 40%.

Net income

Net income was ~~$63.6~~$72.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, compared to net income of ~~$0.6~~$3.1 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The net income was due to the factors discussed above.

Material Trends or Uncertainties

~~Table of Contents~~

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: (1) FFO, (2) Adjusted FFO, (3) EBITDA, ~~and~~ (4) Adjusted EBITDA and (5)Hotel EBITDA. These non-GAAP financial measures could be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income or loss as prescribed by GAAP as a measure of our operating performance.

FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating activities under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash expenditures for long-term assets and other items that have been and will be incurred. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for management’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures, property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties.

Table of Contents

We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment

Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate, impairment write-downs, items classified by GAAP as extraordinary, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, plus depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs), and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures following the same approach. We believe that the presentation of FFO provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it measures our performance without regard to specified non-cash items such as real estate depreciation and amortization, gain or loss on sale of real estate assets and certain other items that we believe are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel properties. We believe that these items are more representative of our asset base and our acquisition and disposition activities than our ongoing operations, and that by excluding the effects of the items, FFO is useful to investors in comparing our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report FFO using the NAREIT definition.

We further adjust FFO for certain additional items that are not in NAREIT’s definition of FFO, including hotel property acquisition costs and other charges, losses on the early extinguishment of debt and similar items related to our unconsolidated real estate entities that we believe do not represent recurring operations. We believe that Adjusted FFO provides investors with another financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs that make similar adjustments to FFO.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Adjusted FFO for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except share data):


	For the three months ended					For the six months ended					For the three months ended						For the nine months ended
	June 30,										September 30,
	2014			2013		2014			2013		2014			2013			2014			2013
Funds From Operations (“FFO”):
Net income	$	65,314		$	2,176	$	63,582		$	557	$	8,832		$	2,541		$	72,414		$	3,098
Noncontrolling interests	(108		)	—		(108		)	—		(132		)	—			(240		)	—
Net gain from remeasurement and sale of investment in unconsolidated real estate entities	(66,701		)	—		(66,701		)	—		—			—			(66,701		)	—
Loss on the sale of assets within the unconsolidated real estate entity	—			259		1			273
Loss (gain) on the sale of assets within the unconsolidated real estate entity											—			(35		)	1			238
Depreciation	7,335			4,003		13,623			7,739		10,238			4,726			23,862			12,466
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items	1,229			1,285		2,435			2,526		1,038			1,305			3,472			3,832
FFO attributable to common shareholders	7,069			7,723		12,832			11,095		19,976			8,537			32,808			19,634
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges	5,559			1,059		7,041			1,236		335			1,345			7,376			2,581
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			—		184			933		—			—			184			933
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items	2,218			5		2,220			8		(190		)	954			2,031			962
Adjusted FFO	$	14,846		$	8,787	$	22,277		$	13,272	$	20,121		$	10,836		$	42,399		$	24,110
Weighted average number of common shares
Basic	26,437,878			18,147,108		26,355,237			17,682,199		27,370,815			22,508,988			26,697,483			19,308,809
Diluted	26,734,919			18,383,626		26,637,261			17,897,255		27,695,347			22,769,282			26,994,657			19,539,941

Diluted per share count may differ from GAAP per share count when FFO or Adjusted FFO is positive. Unvested restricted shares and unvested long-term incentive plan units that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future would not be included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the periods where a loss has been recorded because they would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.

We calculate EBITDA for purposes of the credit facility debt covenants as net income or loss excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) provision for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; (3) depreciation and amortization; and (4) unconsolidated real estate entity items including interest, depreciation and amortization. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because it helps investors compare our operating performance between periods and between REITs by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. In addition, we use EBITDA as one measure in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.

Table of Contents

We further adjust EBITDA for certain additional items, including hotel property acquisition costs and other charges, gains or losses on the sale of real estate, losses on the early extinguishment of debt, amortization of non-cash share-based compensation and similar items related to our unconsolidated real estate entities which we believe are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel properties entities. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides investors with another financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following is a reconciliation of net ~~increase~~income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):


	For the three months ended					For the six months ended					For the three months ended						For the nine months ended
	June 30,										September 30,
	2014			2013		2014			2013		2014			2013			2014			2013
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”):
Net income	$	65,314		$	2,176	$	63,582		$	557	$	8,832		$	2,541		$	72,414		$	3,098
Interest expense	4,362			2,817		8,100			5,658		6,714			2,775			14,815			8,433
Income tax expense	38			45		41			45		44			30			85			75
Depreciation and amortization	7,365			4,026		13,680			7,778		10,273			4,748			23,953			12,526
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items	2,765			2,768		5,389			5,563		1,981			2,775			7,369			8,279
Noncontrolling interests	(108		)	—		(108		)	—		(132		)	—			(240		)	—
EBITDA	79,736			11,832		90,684			19,601		27,712			12,869			118,396			32,411
Hotel property acquisition costs and other charges	5,559			1,059		7,041			1,236		335			1,345			7,376			2,581
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			—		184			933		—			—			184			933
Adjustments for unconsolidated real estate entity items	2,296			5		2,298			8		(168		)	954			2,130			960
Net gain from remeasurement and sale of investment in unconsolidated real estate entities	(66,701		)	—		(66,701		)	—		—			—			(66,701		)	—
Loss on the sale of assets within the unconsolidated real estate entity	—			259		1			273
Loss (gain) on the sale of assets within the unconsolidated real estate entity											—			(35		)	1			240
Share based compensation	628			531		1,213			1,080		627			509			1,840			1,589
Adjusted EBITDA	$	21,518		$	13,686	$	34,720		$	23,131	$	28,506		$	15,642		$	63,226		$	38,714

The following is a presentation of Hotel EBITDA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):



	For the three months ended				For the For the nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013

Total revenue	$	60,246	34,912		$	143,023	$	90,669
Total hotel operating expenses	28,983		18,601		73,400		49,468
Gross operating income	31,263		16,311		69,623		41,201
Less property taxes and insurance	3,254		2,297		8,712		6,329
Hotel EBITDA	$	28,009	$	14,014	$	60,911	$	34,872

We present Hotel EBITDA because we believe it is useful to investors in comparing our hotel operating performance between periods. Hotel EBITDA represents the results of operations for the hotels only.

Although we present FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because we believe they are useful to investors in comparing our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures, these measures have limitations as analytical tools. Some of these limitations are:

Table of Contents

FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect funds available to make cash distributions;

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debts;

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may need to be replaced in the future, and FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

Non-cash compensation is and will remain a key element of our overall long-term incentive compensation package, although we exclude it as an expense when evaluating our ongoing operating performance for a particular period using Adjusted EBITDA;

Adjusted FFO and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges (including acquisition transaction costs) that result from matters we consider not to be indicative of the underlying performance of our hotel properties; and

Other companies in our industry may calculate FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure.

~~Table of Contents~~

In addition, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity. Because of these limitations, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. Our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere are prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our principal sources of cash include net cash from operations and proceeds from debt and equity issuances. Our principal uses of cash include acquisitions, capital expenditures, operating costs, corporate expenditures, interest costs, ~~and~~ debt repayments and distributions to equity holders.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately ~~$11.9~~$67.1 million and $4.2 million, respectively. We typically maintain approximately $5.0 million of unrestricted cash and cash ~~equivalents.~~equivalents but on September 24, 2014, we raised net proceeds of $144.7 million in anticipation of acquiring four hotels from the Inland Portfolio in addition to funding our investment in the Inland JV in the fourth quarter of 2014. Additionally, we had ~~$77.0~~$175.0 million available under our $175.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. On July 9, 2014, we repaid $33.0 million on our senior secured revolving credit facility using $29.4 million of the net proceeds from the issuance of a loan on the Savannah hotel with the remainder funded with excess cash.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014,, net cash flows provided by operations were ~~$15.1~~$37.5 million, ~~comprised of~~driven by net income of ~~$63.6~~$72.4 million ~~and primarily significant~~offset by $38.1 million of non-cash ~~expenses,~~items, including ~~$14.4~~$25.1 million of depreciation and amortization, $0.2 million from the extinguishment of debt, $1.8 million of share-based compensation expense and $1.5 million related to the loss from unconsolidated entities, offset by a net gain from the sale of interests in unconsolidated real estate entities of $66.7 ~~million, $0.2 million from the extinguishment of debt, $1.2 million of share-based compensation expense and $2.3 million related to the loss from unconsolidated entities.~~million. In addition, changes in operating assets and liabilities due to the timing of cash receipts, payments for real estate taxes, payments of corporate compensation and payments from our hotels resulted in net cash inflow of ~~$0.1~~$3.2 million. Net cash flows used in investing activities were ~~$276.0~~$317.2 million, primarily related to the purchase of the 4four Silicon Valley hotels and the Cherry Creek Hotel for ~~$265.3~~$297.3 million, capital improvements on our 2930 wholly owned hotels of ~~$7.7~~$10.1 million, ~~$3.4~~$10.7 million related to ~~the~~ required escrow deposits of restricted cash, reduced by distributions of ~~$0.4~~$0.9 million from unconsolidated real estate entities. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were ~~$268.6~~$342.5 million, comprised of proceeds from the issuance of new mortgage loans of ~~$256.0~~$286.0 million, ~~net borrowings on~~$150.8 million raised from our ~~senior secured revolving credit facility of $48.0 million, $10.9~~September 2014 follow-on common share offering, $16.1 million raised from our At The Market Equity Offering ("ATM Plan"), net repayments on our senior secured revolving credit facility of $50.0 million, principal payments or payoffs on mortgage debt of ~~$33.5~~$34.2 million, payments of deferred financing and offering costs of ~~$1.0~~$7.9 million and distributions to shareholders of ~~$11.8~~$18.3 million.

Table of Contents

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, net cash flows provided by operations were ~~$12.1~~$22.0 million, ~~as our~~comprised of net income of ~~$0.6~~$3.1 million ~~was due in significant part to~~and primarily non-cash expenses, including ~~$8.4~~$13.4 million of depreciation and amortization, $0.9 million from the extinguishment of debt, ~~$1.1~~$1.6 million of share-based compensation expense and a ~~$0.7~~$1.4 million from the loss from unconsolidated entities. In addition, changes in operating assets and liabilities due to the timing of cash receipts, payments for real estate taxes, payments of corporate compensation and payments from our hotels resulted in net cash inflow of ~~$0.4~~$1.6 million. Net cash flows used byin investing activities were ~~$82.4~~$119.6 million, primarily related to the purchase of the Houston CYCourtyard Hotel and Pittsburgh Hotel, Exeter Hotel and Denver Tech Hotel of ~~$74.8~~$117.8 million, capital improvements on our 2123 wholly owned hotels of ~~$7.1~~$11.2 million, investment in the Torrance JV of $1.7 million, ~~offset by $0.3~~$2.1 million related to the ~~receipt~~required escrow deposits of restricted cash, ~~and $0.9~~reduced by distributions of $13.1 million ~~net proceeds~~ from ~~mortgage financing.~~unconsolidated real estate entities. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were ~~$84.5~~$153.6 million, comprised primarily of ~~$134.2~~$193.8 million raised from our January, June and ~~June~~September 2013 follow-on common share offerings, and proceeds from the issuance of refinanced and new mortgage loans of $117.0 million, offset by new repayments on our senior secured revolving credit facility of ~~$49~~$31.0 million, principal payments on mortgage debt of ~~$100.9~~$101.6 million, payments of deferred financing and offering costs of ~~$7.7~~$10.8 million and distributions to shareholders of ~~$9.1~~$13.9 million.

We paid regular quarterly dividends and distributions on common shares and LTIP units beginning with the third quarter of 2010 through 2012. In January 2013, we changed our dividend payment frequency from a quarterly dividend to a monthly dividend. In April 2014, we changed the monthly dividend and distribution from $0.07 to $0.08 ~~per month~~ per common share and LTIP unit. We declared total dividends of ~~$0.42~~$0.63 and ~~$0.45~~$0.69 per common share and LTIP unit for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We intend to maintain our leverage over the long term at a ratio of net debt to investment in hotels (at cost) (defined as our initial acquisition price plus the gross amount of any subsequent capital investment and excluding any impairment charges) to a level lower than where we currently operate, and a subsequent decrease in hotel property values will not necessarily cause us to repay debt to comply with this limitation. However, our Board of Trustees believes that ~~increasing our~~monitoring higher leverage ~~limit~~levels at this stage of the lodging recovery cycle is appropriate, so we will continue to make acquisitions or hotel investments where suitable. Our leverage ratio at ~~June~~September 30, 2014 is ~~51%~~37.5%, which is up from 36% at December 31, 2013. We will pay down borrowings on our secured revolving credit facility with excess cash flow until we find other uses of cash such as investments in our existing hotels, hotel acquisitions or further joint venture investments.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $~~98.0~~0.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, in borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there were 13 properties in the borrowing base under the credit agreement and the maximum borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was approximately $175.0 million. We also had mortgage debt on individual hotels aggregating ~~$444.5~~$473.9 million and $222.1 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The maturity date of the credit facility is November 5, 2016 and includes an option to extend the maturity date by an additional year. Other key features of the credit facility are as follows:



Facility amount		$175 million
Accordion feature		Increase additional $50 million
LIBOR floor		None
Interest rate applicable margin		200-300 basis points, based on leverage ratio
Unused fee		25 basis points if less than 50% unused, 35 basis points if more than 50% unused
Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio		1.5x

The credit facility contains representations, warranties, covenants, terms and conditions customary for transactions of this type, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum net worth financial covenants, limitations on (i) liens, (ii) incurrence of debt, (iii) investments, (iv) distributions, and (v) mergers and asset dispositions, covenants to preserve corporate existence and comply with laws, covenants on the use of proceeds of the credit facility and default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants, cross-defaults and guarantor defaults. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at ~~June~~September 30, 2014. We expect to meet all financial covenants during the remainder of 2014 based upon our current projections.

Table of Contents

We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our credit facility or through the encumbrance of any unencumbered hotels. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will be adequate to fund operating obligations, pay interest on any borrowings and fund dividends in accordance with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as hotel property acquisitions and debt maturities or repayments through additional long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, the issuance of additional equity or debt securities, including through our dividend reinvestment and ~~stock~~share purchase plan ("DRSPP") or ATM Plan, each as described below, or the possible sale of existing assets.

Through our $25.0 million DRSPP, which was established in January 2014, shareholders may purchase additional common shares by reinvesting some or all of the cash dividends received on our common shares. Shareholders may also make optional cash purchases of our common shares subject to certain limitations detailed in the prospectus for the DRSPP. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had issued ~~149~~1,074 shares under the DRSPP at a weighted average price of ~~$22.12.~~$22.24. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was approximately ~~$25.0~~$24.9 million of common shares available for issuance under the DRSPP.

In January 2014, we also established an ATM Plan whereby, from time to time, we may publicly offer and sell up to $50 million of our common shares by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, in negotiated transactions or in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. acting as sales agent. ~~As of~~For the three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we ~~had~~ issued ~~486,820~~219,000 and 705,820 shares under the ATM Plan at a weighted average price of ~~$22.53.~~$23.26 and $22.76 raising net proceeds after sales commissions and fees of approximately $5.1 million and $16.1 million, respectively. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was approximately ~~$39.0~~$33.9 million ~~of common shares~~ available for issuance under the ATM Plan.

~~Table of Contents~~

We intend to continue to invest in hotel properties only as suitable opportunities arise. We intend to finance our future investments with the net proceeds from additional issuances of common and preferred shares, issuances of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership or other ~~securities~~securitiesm borrowings or ~~borrowings.~~asset sales. The success of our acquisition strategy depends, in part, on our ability to access additional capital through ~~issuances of equity securities and borrowings.~~other sources. There can be no assurance that we will continue to make investments in properties that meet our investment criteria. Additionally, we may choose to dispose of certain hotels ~~that do not meet our long-term investment objectives~~ as a means to provide liquidity.

Dividend Policy

Our current common share dividend policy is generally to distribute, annually, at least 100% of our annual taxable income. The amount of any dividends is determined by our Board of Trustees. Our Board of Trustees approved a change in the frequency of our dividend payments to monthly in January 2013, with a targeted monthly dividend of $0.07 per common share and LTIP unit for 2013. In April 2014, our Board of Trustees approved an increase to our monthly dividend and distribution to $0.08 per common share and LTIP unit. The aggregate amount of dividends and distributions declared for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 were ~~$0.45~~$0.69 per common share and LTIP unit.

Capital Expenditures

We intend to maintain each hotel property in good repair and condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with the franchisor’s standards and any agreed-upon requirements in our management and loan agreements. After we acquire a hotel property, we may be required to complete a property improvement plan (“PIP”) in order to be granted a new franchise license for that particular hotel property. PIPs are intended to bring the hotel property up to the franchisor’s standards. Certain of our loans require that we escrow for property improvement purposes, at the hotels collateralizing these loans, amounts up to 5% of gross revenue from such hotels. We intend to spend amounts necessary to

comply with any reasonable loan or franchisor requirements and otherwise to the extent that such expenditures are in the best interest of the hotel. To the extent that we spend more on capital expenditures than is available from our operations, we intend to fund those capital expenditures with available cash and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, we invested approximately ~~$4.0~~$2.1 million and ~~$4.8~~$4.3 million, respectively, and for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, we invested approximately ~~$7.7~~$9.8 million and ~~$8.7~~$13.0 million, respectively, on capital investments in our hotels. We expect to invest an additional ~~$8.3~~$6.2 million on capital improvements on our existing hotels for the remainder of 2014.

The Company is considering the redevelopment and expansion of all four hotels that comprise the Silicon Valley Hotels to increase the aggregate room count by 36% to a total of 1,023 rooms. The 272 room expansion, which would take approximately 12 months from commencement date at each location once all approvals are obtained, is expected to include a new lobby and public spaces in each location with an estimated aggregate cost of approximately $59.0 million, or approximately $217,000 per room.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands). We had no other material off-balance sheet arrangements at ~~June~~September 30, 2014, other than non-recourse debt associated with the NewINK JV and the Torrance JV as discussed below.


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More Than Five Years		Total		Less Than One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More Than Five Years
Corporate office lease	$	44	$	20	$	24	$	—	$	—	$	34	$	10	$	24	$	—	$	—
Revolving credit facility, including interest (1)	104,765		1,400		103,365		—		—		1,327		153		1,174		—		—
Ground leases	12,185		104		422		431		11,228		12,133		52		422		431		11,228
Property loans, including interest (1)	597,837		15,484		48,663		37,581		496,109		652,578		6,923		61,507		50,425		533,723
Total	$	714,831	$	17,008	$	152,474	$	38,012	$	507,337	$	666,072	$	7,138	$	63,127	$	50,856	$	544,951


(1)	Does not reflect paydowns or additional borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility after ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Interest payments are based on the interest rate in effect as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. See Note 8, “Debt” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information relating to our property loans.

~~Table of Contents~~

In addition, we pay management fees to our hotel management companies based on the revenues of our hotels.

The Company’s ownership interests in the NewINK JV and the Torrance JV are subject to change in the event that either Chatham, NorthStar or Cerberus calls for additional capital contributions to the respective JVs, as applicable, necessary for the conduct of that JV's business, including contributions to fund costs and expenses related to capital expenditures. We manage the NewINK JV and the Torrance JV and will receive a promote interest in the applicable JV if it meets certain return thresholds. NorthStar and Cerberus may also approve certain actions by their respective JV without the Company’s consent, including certain property dispositions conducted at arm’s length, certain actions related to the restructuring of either JV and removal of the Company as managing member in the event the Company fails to fulfill its material obligations under either joint venture agreement.

In connection with certain non-recourse mortgage loans in either the NewINK JV or the Torrance JV, our Operating Partnership could require us to repay our pro rata share of portions of their indebtedness in connection with certain customary non-recourse carve-out provisions such as environmental conditions, misuse of funds, and material misrepresentations.

Inflation

Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the effects of inflation. However, competitive pressures may limit the ability of our management companies to raise room rates.

Seasonality

Demand for our hotels is affected by recurring seasonal patterns. Generally, we expect that we will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first and fourth quarters and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second and third quarters. These general trends are, however, influenced by overall economic cycles and the geographic locations of our hotels.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting policies, are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In April 2014, the FASB issued amendments to guidance for reporting discontinued operations and disposals of components of an entity. The amended guidance requires that a disposal representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results or a business activity classified as held for sale upon acquisition should be reported as discontinued operations. The amendments also expand the disclosure requirements for discontinued operations and add new disclosures for individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014 (early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported). Early adoption is permitted for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We adopted this accounting standard update effective January 1, 2014 and do not expect the implementation of the amended guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position ofor results of operations, but do expect these amendments to impact the ~~Company~~Company's determination of which future property disposals qualify as discontinued operations as well as requiring additional disclosures about discontinued operations.

3740

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our assumption of long-term debt in connection with our acquisitions. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will seek to borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. With respect to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate risk by identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.

The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates. Rates take into consideration general market conditions and maturity and fair value of the underlying collateral. The estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt at ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $~~446.4~~476.3 million and $220.0 million, respectively.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, our consolidated debt was comprised of floating and fixed interest rate debt. The fair value of our fixed rate debt indicates the estimated principal amount of debt having the same debt service requirements that could have been borrowed at the date presented, at then current market interest rates. The following table provides information about the maturities of our financial instruments as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates (in thousands):


	2014		2015		2016			2017			2018			Thereafter		Total			Fair Value		2014		2015		2016			2017			2018			Thereafter		Total			Fair Value
Floating rate:
Debt	—		—		$	98,000		—			—			—		$	98,000		$	97,989	—		—		$	—		—			—			—		$	—		$	—
Average interest rate (1)	—		—		2.66		%	—			—			—		2.66		%			—		—		2.66		%	—			—			—		2.66		%
Fixed rate:
Debt	$1,317		$8,313		$9,533			$	3,802		$	3,980		$417,590		$	444,535		$	446,376	$658		$8,319		$9,555			$	3,802		$	3,980		$447,590		$	473,904		$	476,349
Average interest rate	4.91	%	5.41	%	5.51		%	4.77		%	4.77		%	4.69	%	4.73		%			4.88	%	5.41	%	5.51		%	4.77		%	4.77		%	4.69	%	4.72		%


(1)	LIBOR of 0.16% plus a margin of 2.50% at ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

We estimate that a hypothetical one-percentage point increase in the variable interest rate would result in additional interest expense of approximately $1.0 million annually. This assumes that the amount outstanding under our floating rate debt remains at ~~$98.0 million, the balance as of~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~.

3841

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us or our properties. See Note 13 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation”.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~The following risk factor supplements our risk factors described in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Except as set forth below, there~~

There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Item 1A of the ~~Company's~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013,.

~~Risks Related to Our Business and Properties~~

~~If we determine to make significant capital expenditures to any or all of~~ other than the ~~four Silicon Valley hotels we acquired~~updates included in Part II, Item 1A in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014 ~~to redevelop or expand these hotels, the performance of these hotels may be adversely impacted during such redevelopment or expansion~~ and the ~~future performance of these hotels may be dependent on the successful completion of the capital expenditure program developed for each hotel.~~

~~We are currently considering investing approximately $59 million~~updates included in Item 8.01 in the ~~redevelopment or expansion of~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the ~~four Silicon Valley hotels we acquired in June~~SEC on September 24, 2014. ~~If we determine to move forward with this possible redevelopment~~

~~or expansion, no assurance can be given that the capital expenditure program developed for each hotel will be~~

~~completed on time, on budget or at all. If we adopt these capital expenditure programs and the programs are not~~

~~completed successfully, it could have an impact on the expected performance of these hotels. Further, while these~~

~~capital expenditure programs are being implemented at these hotels, guest rooms and certain public spaces may~~

~~be out of service, which could have a material impact on the financial performance of the hotels and our~~

~~company.~~

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 5. Other Information.

A previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed by the Company on June 10, 2014 (the “June 8-K”), on June 9, 2014, the Company acquired a 10.3% interest in the NewINK JV,which is comprised of two joint ventures between affiliates of NorthStar and the Company that collectively own a 47-hotel portfolio that was formerly part of the Innkeepers JV. Concurrent with the closing of NewINK JV and the Company’s acquisition of four hotels in the Silicon Valley region of California (the “Four-Pack Acquisition”), wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and NorthStar entered into amended and restated limited liability company agreements for the two joint venture entities that comprise the NewINK JV (the “NewINK JV Agreements”), which agreements sets forth the terms and conditions of, among other things, the management and economics of the NewINK JV.None.

Pursuant to the NewINK JV Agreements, Company will manage the day-to-day operations of the NewINK JV, subject to the approval of NorthStar of transactions with affiliates of the Company and Major Decisions (as defined in the NewINK JV Agreements), while NorthStar shall have unilateral decision-making control over, among other things, certain property dispositions conducted at arm’s length, the financing of the NewINK JV, certain liquidity events and, upon a Termination Event (as defined in the NewINK JV Agreements), removal of the Company as a managing member.

The Company will be entitled to receive a promote interest in the joint ventures based on the respective joint ventures meeting certain return thresholds. The Company’s ownership interest in the NewINK JV is subject to change in the event that either Chatham or NorthStar calls for additional capital contributions for certain non-discretionary requirements described in the NewINK JV Agreements or, solely in the case of a capital call by NorthStar, necessary for the conduct of business.

Additionally, as previously disclosed in Item 2.03 of the June 8-K, in connection with its funding of the Four-Pack Acquisition, the Company closed on four separate mortgage loans having an aggregate principal balance of $222 million, including the mortgage on the Company’s Residence Inn Silicon Valley II hotel having an initial principal balance of $70.6 million (the “Silicon Valley II Mortgage”). The Silicon Valley II Mortgage was issued pursuant to that certain loan agreement, dated as of June 9, 2014, between Gran Prix Sili II LLC, as borrower, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as lender (the “Silicon Valley II Loan Agreement”). A description of the four mortgage loans on the hotels comprising the Four Pack Acquisition is included in Item 2.03 of the June 8-K, which is incorporated by reference herein.

The foregoing summaries of the NewINK JV Agreements and the Silicon Valley II Loan Agreement do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the NewINK JV Agreement and the Silicon Valley II Loan Agreements, respectively, copies of which are filed as Exhibits 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 to this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

4042

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:



Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit



3.1		Form of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Chatham Lodging Trust⁽¹⁾

3.2		Articles Supplementary⁽²⁾

3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Chatham Lodging Trust⁽³⁾

~~10.1~~		~~Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2014, by and among the entities set forth on Schedule A thereto, Chatham Lodging, LP, NewINK JV and certain individual owners.~~

~~10.2~~		~~Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of INK Acquisition LLC, dated as of June 9, 2014, by and between Platform Member-T, LLC and Chatham Lodging, L.P.~~

~~10.3~~		~~Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of INK Acquisition III LLC, dated as of June 9, 2014, by and between Platform Member Holdings-T Cam2, LLC and Chatham TRS Holding, Inc.~~

~~10.4~~		~~Loan Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2014, between Gran Prix Sili II LLC, as borrower, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as lender~~

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document



~~(1)~~(1	)	Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 to the ~~Registrant's~~Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC on February 12, 2010 (File No. 333-162889)

	.
~~(2)~~
(2	)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 13, 2013.


~~(3)~~(3	)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 13, 2014.

4143

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		CHATHAM LODGING TRUST

Dated:	~~August 8,~~November 6, 2014	/s/ DENNIS M. CRAVEN
		Dennis M. Craven
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

4244