UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30,December 31, 2014

OR

For the transition period from _________ to _________

SALEEN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

(800) 888-8945

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

As of NovemberFebruary 13, 2014,2015, there were 153,285,607170,460,122 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.outstanding.

SALEEN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements:

Saleen Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Saleen Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Saleen Automotive, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited)

For the sixnine month period ended September 30,December 31, 2014

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Saleen Automotive Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(continued)

Saleen Automotive Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(continued)

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Saleen Automotive Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Three and SixNine Month Periods Ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Saleen Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Saleen,” “we,” “us, “our” and “our Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015, or for any other interim period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2014, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year filed on June 30, 2014. The consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2014, has been derived from the audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K filed on June 30, 2014.

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of the Company

The Company designs, develops, manufactures and sells high performance vehicles built from base chassis’ of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros, Dodge Challengers and Tesla Model S vehicles. The Company is a low volume vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing company focusing on the mass customization (the process of customizing automobiles that are mass produced by the manufacturers (Ford, Chevrolet, Dodge and Tesla)) of OEM American Sports and Electric Vehicles. A high performance car is an automobile that is designed and constructed specifically for speed and performance. The design and construction of a high performance car involves not only providing a capable power train but also providing the handling, aerodynamics and braking systems to support it. The Company’s Saleen-branded products include a complete line of upgraded high performance vehicles, automotive aftermarket specialty parts and lifestyle accessories.

History of the Company

Saleen Automotive, Inc. (formerly W270, Inc.) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 24, 2011. The Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its common stock to Mr. Wesley Fry (“Fry”) at inception. Following its formation, the Company issued an additional 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to Fry. On June 21, 2012, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock for a total of $20,000.

On November 30, 2012, Fry and W-Net Fund I, L.P. ( “W-Net”(“W-Net”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Fry sold to W-Net 75.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.

Merger

On May 23, 2013, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Saleen California Merger Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Automotive, Inc. (“Saleen Automotive”), SMS Signature Cars (“SMS” and together with Saleen Automotive, the “Saleen Entities”) and Steve Saleen (“Saleen” and together with the Saleen Entities, the “Saleen Parties”). The closing (the “Closing”) of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Merger”) occurred on June 26, 2013. At the Closing (a) Saleen California Merger Corporation was merged with and into SMS with SMS surviving as one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries; (b) Saleen Florida Merger Corporation was merged with and into Saleen Automotive with Saleen Automotive surviving as one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries; (c) holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive received an aggregate of 554,057 shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock, which was subsequently converted into 69,257,125 shares of the Company’s common stock and holders of the outstanding capital stock of SMS received no consideration for their shares; and (d) approximately 93% of the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock (on a fully-diluted basis) was owned, collectively, by Saleen Parties (including 341,943 shares of the Company’s Super Voting Preferred Stock, which was subsequently converted into 42,742,875 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued to Saleen pursuant to the Assignment and License Agreement) and the former holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive. As a result of the Merger the Company is solely engaged in the Saleen Entities’ business, Saleen Automotive’s then officers became the Company’s officers and Saleen Automotive’s then three directors became members of the Company’s five-member board of directors. On June 17, 2013, the Company consummated a merger with WSTY Subsidiary Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Automotive, Inc. In October 2013, SMS effected an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Signature Cars. In January 2014, the Company effected an increase in the number of its common shares authorized to 500,000,000 and all the remaining shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock were converted into common stock of the Company and the Super Voting Preferred Stock ceased to be a designated series of the Company’s preferred stock.

As the owners and management of Saleen Automotive had voting and operating control of the Company after the Merger, the transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization with the Saleen Entities deemed the acquiring companies for accounting purposes, and the Company deemed the legal acquirer. Due to the change in control, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the historical results of the Saleen Entities prior to the Merger and that of the consolidated company following the Merger. Common stock and the corresponding capital amounts of the Company pre-Merger have been retroactively restated as of the earliest periods presented as capital stock reflecting the exchange ratio in the Merger. The amount of debt assumed upon the Merger of $39,547, legal and closing costs of $46,000, and a dividend of an aggregate amount of $280,000 paid to our stockholders as of May 23, 2013 have been reflected as a cost of the Merger in the statement of operations for the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013.

Consolidation Policy

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Saleen Automotive, Inc., a Florida corporation, Saleen Signature Cars, a California corporation and Saleen Sales Corporation, a California corporation. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification of Certain Prior Year Information

The Company has reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation. This included 1) reclassification of engineering salaries of $153,885 and $245,291 for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2013, respectively, from general and administrative expenses to research and development expenses; 2) reclassification of sales and marketing salaries of $160,372 and $258,626 for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2013, respectively from general and administrative expenses to sales and marketing expenses; and 3) reclassification of promotional trade discount expenses of $32,216$68,974 and $44,368$120,847 for the three and sixnine month periods ended September 30,December 31, 2013, respectively, to revenue from sales and marketing expenses. The reclassification of these amounts had no impact on consolidated net loss or cash flows.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company incurred an operating loss of $3,056,980$4,292,219 and utilized $1,714,196$2,127,243 of cash in operations. The Company also had a stockholders’ deficit and working capital deficit of $5,718,593$7,477,432 and $4,966,212,$6,372,235, respectively, as of September 30,December 31, 2014, and as of that date, the Company owed $583,900$635,250 in past unpaid payroll taxes; $1,148,574$1,295,705 of accounts payable was greater than 90 days past due; $352,795 of outstanding notes payable were in default; and $398,176$365,998 is owed to a bank as of November 2014, which the Company has not paid and expects to be in default unless the bank agrees to another extension.March 2015. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s independent auditors, in their audit report for the year ended March 31, 2014, expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations. At September 30,December 31, 2014 the Company had cash on hand in the amount of $7,261$95,435 and is not generating sufficient funds from operations to cover current operating expenses.production and operations. During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company raised $406,000$888,225 through the issuance of convertible notes, $150,000$195,000 through the issuance of notes payable to related parties, and entered into Subscription Agreements with individual accredited investors (the “Subscribers”) pursuant to which the Subscribers purchased from the Company an aggregate of 1,183,334 of restricted common shares at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $177,500. In addition, on January 26, 2015 the Company entered into two 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $499,892 (see Note 10). However, additional funding will be needed to continue operations through DecemberMarch 31, 2014.2015. In addition, the Company will need and is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate its business through and beyond DecemberMarch 31, 2014.2015. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions and covenants on its operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for its stockholders including diluting Saleen below 50% ownership, in the case of convertible debt and equity financing.

Use of Estimates

Financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among other things, management estimates include the estimated collectability of its accounts receivable, the valuation of the S7 Supercar held for sale, the valuation of long lived assets, warranty reserves, the assumptions used to calculate its derivative liabilities, and equity instruments issued for financing and compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

Authoritative guidance provided by the FASB defines the following levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these financial assets:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that is observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, customer deposits, and notes payable. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

As of September 30,December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheetsheets included the fair value of a derivative liabilityliabilities of $214,728$1,150,116 and $5,032,786, respectively, which was based on Level 2 measurements. There were no other investments or liabilities of the Company measured and recorded at fair value as of September 30,December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

To determine the number of authorized but unissued shares available to satisfy outstanding convertible securities, the Company uses a sequencing method to prioritize its convertible securities as prescribed by ASC 815-40-35. At each reporting date, the Company reviews its convertible securities to determine their classification is appropriate.

Inventories

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10-25. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company established a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the current period. Future realization of the deferred tax benefit depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry forward period under the Federal tax laws.

Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of any related deferred tax asset. Any change in the valuation allowance would be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.

Stock Compensation

The Company uses the fair value recognition provision of ASC 718, “Stock Compensation,” which requires the Company to expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date that vests over a period of time.

The Company also uses the provisions of ASC 505-50, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees,” to account for stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services. Such awards for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines enumerated in ASC 505-50.

Income (Loss)Loss per Share

The Company’s computation of earnings (loss) per share (EPS) includes basic and diluted EPS. The basic EPS is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income (loss)loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. The diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the Company’s net income (loss)loss available to common stockholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted average number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. Certainequity securities unless the effects thereof are anti-dilutive, that is inclusion of such shares would reduce the net loss or increase the net income. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the basic and diluted shares outstanding were the same, as potentially dilutive shares were considered anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2014, stock options, warrants, and convertible notes convertible or exercisable into 7,271,333, 13,313,099, and 139,159,937 shares of common shares arestock, respectively, have been excluded from the diluted income (loss)loss per share calculation if the effects of such dilutive common sharesbecause they are anti-dilutive. In computing diluted EPS, the treasury stock method assumes that outstanding optionsAs of December 31, 2013, warrants and warrants are exercisednotes convertible or exercisable into 3,786,666 and the proceeds are used to purchase38,992,296 shares of common stock, at the average market price during the period.respectively, have been excluded from diluted loss per share because they are anti-dilutive.

Weighted average number of shares outstanding has been retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares received by the accounting acquirer as a result of the reverse merger as if these shares had been outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. Weighted average shares outstanding include, as of the earliest period presented, the equivalent number of common shares that were converted upon conversion of all the Super Voting Preferred Stock, as these shares have the same characteristics of common stock.

Warrants, options and other potentially dilutive debt securities that are anti-dilutive have been excluded from the dilutive calculation when their exercise price or conversion price exceeds the average stock market price during the period or the effect would be anti-dilutive when applying to a net income (loss) during the period presented. The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted shares for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

Significant Concentrations

Sales to twothree separate customers comprised 10%28%, 11% and 15%10%, respectively, and one separate customer comprised 13% of revenues for the three and sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, respectively. Two different customers comprised 44%63% and 29%37% of accounts receivable as of September 30,December 31, 2014. One customer comprised 17% of revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2013. No customers hadcomprised revenues in excess of 10% during the nine months ended December 31, 2013 and no customers comprised accounts receivable in excess of 10% at March 31, 2014 or revenues in excess of 10% during the three and six months ended September 30, 2013.2014.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Adoption of ASU 2014-08 will not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction-transaction and industry-specificindustry specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle basedprinciple-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, on adopting ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In April 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360). ASU 2014-08 amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations or that have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations. This new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting ASU 2014-08 on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted.

In November 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 (ASU 2014-16), Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity.   The amendments in this ASU do not change the current criteria in U.S. GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required.  The amendments clarify that an entity should consider all relevant terms and features, including the embedded derivative feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluating the nature of the host contract.  The ASU applies to all entities that are issuers of, or investors in, hybrid financial instruments that are issued in the form of a share and is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015.  Early adoption is permitted.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

Depreciation and amortization expense was $63,806$40,608 and $26,574$18,588 for the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and was $109,715$150,323 and $46,744 for the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable are comprised as follows:

NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES

Notes payable to related parties are as follows:

NOTE 5 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible notes payable are as follows:

As of SeptemberDecember 31, 2014, $16,041$149,229 was included in current portion of convertible notes payable, which represented convertible notes payable of $156,000$638,225 less debt discount of $139,959.$488,996.

3% Senior secured convertible notes

On June 26, 2013, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued senior secured convertible notes, having a total principal amount of $3,000,000, to 12 accredited investors. The balance of convertible notes outstanding as of March 31, 2014 was $2,586,732. During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, note holders converted $585,012 of principal and $11,941 of accrued and unpaid interest into 8,032,186 shares of the Company’s common stock. The balance of the convertible notes outstanding as of September 30,December 31, 2014 was $2,001,720 and is convertible into 27,797,57327,995,547 shares of Common Stock including accrued and unpaid interest. The balance of convertible notes outstanding as of March 31, 2014 was $2,586,732. The Notes pay 3.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 4 years (June 25, 2017) and are secured by all assets and intellectual property of the Company. No cash interest payments will be required, except that accrued and unconverted interest shall be due on the maturity date and on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being converted, provided that such interest may be added to and included with the principal amount being converted.

Each Note is convertible at any time into the Company’s common stock at a specified conversion price, which currently iswas $0.075 per share.share as of December 31, 2014. Prior to June 2014, the Note conversion price was subject to specified adjustments for certain changes in the numbers of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, including conversions or exchanges thereof, and the agreements included an anti-dilution provision that allowed for the automatic reset of the conversion or exercise price upon any future sale of the Company’s common stock instruments at or below the then current exercise price. In June 2014, in exchange for the issuance in aggregate of 389,923 shares of common stock valued at $58,488, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note (“3% First Amendment”) to remove all specified adjustments to the conversion price except for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. In addition, if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount. The Company recorded $58,488 as additional debt discount related to the value of the 389,923 shares issued, which is being amortized over the remaining term of the Notes.

In January 2015, the Notes were amended to adjust the conversion price to equal the lesser of (i) $0.075 and (ii) 70% of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices (“VWAP”) occurring during the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding the applicable conversion date, but not less than $0.02 per share (see Note 10).

The Company considered the current FASB guidance of “Determining Whether an Instrument Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability or whether or not within the issuers’ control, means the instrument is not indexed to the issuers own stock. Accordingly, the Company determined that prior to June 2014, the conversion prices of the notes were not a fixed amount because they were subject to adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features werefeature was not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of these conversion features as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The Company determined that upon issuance of the notes on June 26, 2013, the initial fair value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature of the notes was $1,660,656. This amount was determined by management with the use of an independent valuation specialist using a Monte Carlo simulation option pricing model. As such, the Company recorded a $1,660,656 derivative liability with an offsetting change to valuation discount upon issuance for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the 3% First Amendment entered into in June 2014, the conversion price iswas considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and was no longer subject to fluctuation based on the occurrence of future offerings or events except for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As a result, the Company determined that the derivative liability was extinguished in June 2014 (See Note 6).

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013, the Company amortized $184,456$270,701 and $108,341,$215,348, respectively, of the valuation discount as additional interest expense. During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company wrote off the remaining unamortized debt discount allocated to the convertible notes of $209,364 to interest expense. As of September 30,December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, the remaining unamortized valuation discount of $913,649$827,105 and $1,248,981, respectively, has been offset against the face amount of the notes for financial statement purposes.

7% Unsecured convertible notes

In March and April 2014, as amended in June 2014, the Company issued 7% Unsecured Convertible Notes, having a total principal amount of $2,250,000 and $250,000, respectively, to 5 accredited investors of which $2,000,000 was received from 3 investors who participated in the June 26, 2013 offering above. The Notes were issued in a private placement, exempt from the Securities Act registration requirements. During the nine months ended December 31, 2014 one note holder converted $300,000 of principal and $15,808 of accrued interest into 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Notes pay 7.0% interest per annum with a maturity of 3 years (March and April, 2017). No cash interest payments are required, except that accruedunconverted outstanding principal and unconvertedaccrued interest shall be due and payable on the maturity date and on each conversion date with respect to the principal amount being converted, provided that such interest may be added to and included with the principal amount being converted.date. Each Note is initially convertible at any time into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price, which is adjustable to the lower of $0.07 or the three lowest daily volume weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock during the twenty consecutive trading days immediately preceding any conversion date. However, in no event shall the conversion price be lower than $0.03 per share. As of September 30, 2014, the conversion price was approximately $0.04 per share and represented 61,646,190 shares of Common Stock. In addition, the conversion price adjusts for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As of December 31, 2014, the principal balance of the convertible Notes outstanding was $2,200,000 and is convertible into 77,169,100 shares of Common Stock including accrued and unpaid interest.

In June 2014, in exchange for the issuance in aggregate of 357,143 shares of its common stock valued at $53,571, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 7% Convertible Note whereby effective as of March 31, 2014 or the applicable issuance date for notes issued thereafter, the conversion price would in no event adjust below $0.03 per share. In addition, if a Fundamental Transaction, as defined, were to occur the potential liquidated damages was set to a fixed amount. The Company recorded $53,571 as additional debt discount related to the value of the shares issued, which is being amortized over the remaining term of the Notes.

As the initial conversion price of $0.07 reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the issuance date of the Notes, the Company determined that there was deemed a beneficial conversion feature associated with these Notes. As such, the Company recorded $2,250,000 and $250,000 in March 2014 and April 2014, respectively, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at the issuance date of the Notes in additional paid-in capital. The value of the beneficial conversion feature is being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the Notes, which totaled $422,206$631,168 for the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014. As of September 30December 31 and March 31, 2014, the remaining unamortized valuation discount of $2,131,365$1,689,735 and $2,250,000, respectively, has been offset against the face amount of the notes for financial statement purposes.

8% Unsecured convertible notes

InFrom September 2014 to December 2014, the Company issued pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor, two Convertible Promissory Notes (“Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $156,000.$638,225 to eight separate accredited investors. The Notes bear interest atranging from 8% to 12% per annum and mature in June 2015; however, within the 180-day period after the issuance of the Notes, theon various dates from April 2015 to December 2016. The Company may prepay the Notes within periods ranging from 90 to 180 days after issuance subject to a premium between 110% and 135%150% of the then outstanding amount due depending on the date of payment. After the 180^th day,this period, the Company may not prepay the note.Notes, with the exception of one note in the principal amount of $40,000. Further, the notesNotes contain provisions that under certain events of default, as defined in the agreement,agreements, the amount owed wouldcould increase by amounts ranging from 135% to 150% depending on the event of the original amount owed.default. In addition, in the event of non-payment when due, the interest raterates would increase to 22%between 20% and 25% per annum from the date due until paid.

The Notes are convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at the option of the holder commencing on the 180^th dayvarious dates following the date of the Notes and ending on the later of the maturity date or date of full payment of principal and interest. The principal amount of the Notes along with, at the holder’s option, any unpaid interest and penalties, isare convertible at a price per share equaldiscounts ranging from 42% to the greater of (a) 61% of the average of the lowest 5 trading prices38% of the Company’s common stock trading market price during a certain time period, as defined in the 10 trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior toagreement. Further, the conversion date, and (b) $0.00009.prices are subject to a floor such that the conversion prices will not be less than a certain price, as defined in the agreement, with such floor prices ranging from $0.001 to $0.00005 per share. In addition, the conversion price isprices are subject to adjustment in certain events, such as in conjunction with any sale, conveyance or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or consummation of a transaction or series of related transactions in which the Company is not the surviving entity. Further, the conversion price is subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution protection for any issuance of securities (other than employee stock options) at a price per share below the then conversion price in effect at the time of issuance. As of the September 30,December 31, 2014 and assuming that the holderholders had the right to convert the Notes, the Notes would have been convertible into approximately 3,936,91035,782,732 shares of Common Stock. Per agreement,the Notes, the Company is required to reserve 28,000,000153,000,000 shares of Common Stock for the conversion of these Notes.

The Company considered the current FASB guidance of “Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability of whether or not within the issuers’ control means the instrument is not indexed to the issuers own stock. Accordingly, the Company determined that the conversion prices of the notes were not a fixed amount because they were subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. In addition, the Company determined that instruments with floor prices ranging from $0.001 to $0.00001 were de minimis and in substance not indexed to the Company’s own stock. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features areof the notes were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of thesethe conversion features as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The Company determined that upon issuance of the Notes, the initial fair value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature of the notes to be $241,882.was $1,306,455. The Company determined this amount by using a weighted-average Black-Scholes-Merton model using the following assumptions: (i) fair market value of stock as of the date of issuance of the note ranging from $0.03 to $0.07; (ii) dividend yield of 0%; (iii) expected volatility of 125%ranging from 124% to 139%; (iv) risk free rate of .08%rates ranging from .04% to .55%; and (v) expected term of .75ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 years. As such, the Company recorded a $241,882$1,306,455 derivative liability, with anof which $638,225 was recorded as debt discount offsetting charge to valuation discountthe fair value of $156,000 withthe Notes and the remainder of $85,882$668,230 recorded as an expense included in other income (expense) in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and sixnine months ended SeptemberDecember 31, 2014. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company amortized $16,041$149,229 of the valuation discount, and the remaining unamortized valuation discount of $139,959$488,996 as of September 30,December 31, 2014 has been offset against the face amount of the Notes for financial statement purposes. The remainder of the valuation discount will be amortized as interest expense over the remaining term of the Notes. The derivative liability is re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations (see Note 6).

NOTE 6 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. Under the authoritative guidance, effective January 1, 2009, instruments, which do not have fixed settlement provisions, are deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion feature of the Company’s senior secured convertible notes and unsecured convertible notes (described in Note 5 above), did not have fixed settlement provisions because their conversion prices could be lowered if the Company issues securities at lower prices in the future.future or the ultimate determination of shares to be issued could exceed current available authorized shares. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of the notes was separated from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative instrument. The conversion feature of the notes had been characterized as a derivative liability and iswas re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

As discussed in Note 5 above, the conversion feature of the Company’s senior secured convertible notes issued in June 2013 and unsecured convertible notes issued in September 2014 was separated from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative instrument. The Company re-measures derivative instruments outstanding at the end of every reporting period with the change in value from previous period reported in the statement of operations. The following represents the changes in the Company’s derivative liabilities:

In June 2014 the Company entered into a First Amendment to Saleen Automotive, Inc. 3.0% Secured Convertible Note to remove all specified adjustments to the conversion price except for standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As a result of this amendment, after June 17, 2014 the Company no longer recognized a derivative liability related to these notes.

During 2014 the derivative liability was valued at the following dates using a Weighted-Average Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company used its own stock’s volatility as the estimated volatility. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes was based on the remaining terms of the notes. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends to its common stockholders in the past and does not expect to pay dividends to its common stockholders in the future.

The Company recognized income of $27,156$129,182 and $2,473,210$2,602,392 as other income (expense) during the three and sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, respectively, and incomean expense of $140,899$125,026 and $51,134$73,892 as other income (expense) during the three and sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013, respectively, which represented the change in the fair value of derivative liability from the previous reporting period. In addition, the Company recognized a gain of $2,586,732 upon extinguishment of the derivative liability as of June 17, 2014 related to the 3% convertible note.notes.

NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The amounts of accounts payable to related parties as of September 30December 31 and March 31, 2014 are as follows:

Other Transactions

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013, the Company incurred $88,313$230,860 in accounting advisory and CFO services with Miranda & Associates, a firm owned by its former Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Robert Miranda.

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013, the Company issued 5,277 shares of its Super Voting Preferred stock or the equivalent of 659,625 shares of its Common Stock, to Robert J. Miranda and Jonathan Michaels (329,811 common shares each). These shares were valued at $250,000, which was recorded as director’s fee expense. These shares were issued in consideration of Messrs. Miranda’s and Michaels’ service on the Company’s board of directors.

NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Issuance of common stock

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company entered into Subscription Agreements with individual accredited investors (the “Subscribers”) pursuant to which the Subscribers purchased an aggregate of 1,183,334 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $0.15 for aggregate proceeds of $177,500, and also received Common Stock Purchase Warrants to purchase 1,183,334 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $170,000 in in exchange for services.

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company issued 1,285,460 shares of common stock to settle $470,534 of previously recorded accounts to be settled through issuance of equity securities. As a result, the Company reclassified the $470,534 from a liability as of March 31, 2014 to equity during the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014.

On December 19, 2014, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with a vendor whereby the Company agreed to issue 4,731,836 shares of common stock in exchange for extinguishment of amount owed of $141,955. The value of the common stock was based on a fair value of $0.03 per share. The Company recorded $58,885 as expense related to the difference between $141,955 fair value of common stock issued and $83,070 amount recorded as accounts payable as of the date of settlement.

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013, the Company issued the equivalent of 12,178 shares of its Super Voting Preferred Stock or 1,522,250 shares of its common stock in exchange for the settlement of claims, conditions of employment, director’s fees, and payment of information technology services. These shares were valued at $576,981 based on management’s estimate of value of the shares issued and was recorded as general and administration expense.

Omnibus Incentive Plan

In January 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is administered by the Company’s board of directors or a committee thereof (the “Administrator”) as set forth in the Plan. The Plan provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted share awards and restricted stock units to employees, directors (including non-employee directors), advisors and consultants. Grants under the Plan vest and expire based on periods determined by the Administrator, but in no event can the expiration date be later than ten years from the date of grant (five years after the date of grant if the grant is an incentive stock option to an employee who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Company’s capital stock (a “10% owner”)). Grants of stock options may be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. The per share exercise price on an option, other than with respect to substitute awards, shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the option is granted (110% of the fair market value if the grant is to a 10% owner). A total of 28,905,763 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance and reserved under the Plan. The Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders on January 13, 2014.

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted. The Company’s assessment of the estimated fair value of stock options is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables and the related tax impact.

Stock option activity is set forth below:

The aggregate intrinsic value shown in the table above represents the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s common stock of $0.06$0.03 on September 30,December 31, 2014 and the exercise price of each option.

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company recorded stock compensation expense of $353,975$580,933 of which $47,972, $190,272,$56,805, $229,305, and $115,731$294,822 was included in research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, respectively. There were no options outstanding during the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013. Unearned compensation of $523,842 existed$489,484 at September 30,December 31, 2014, related to non-vested stock options, which will be recognized into expense over a weighted average period of 1.91.2 years.

Warrants

The following summarizes warrant activity for the Company during the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014:

During the sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised for total proceeds of $7,500. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, 13,313,099 warrants were exercisable and the intrinsic value of the warrants was nil.

NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGINCIESCONTINGENCIES

Purchase Commitments

In April 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with BASF to exclusively use BASF’s products for paint work. The agreement continues from May 2014 until the Company purchases in aggregate $4,131,000 of BASF products. If the aggregate purchases of BASF products are less than $1,697,000 over a period of 36 consecutive months, the Company is required to repay BASF 6.1% of the shortfall between $1,697,000 and the amount it actually purchased over this period. In consideration for the Company’s exclusive use of BASF’s products and fulfilling this purchase commitment, BASF paid the Company $250,000, which was recorded as deferred vendor consideration. This amount will be recorded as a reduction of cost of services based on a systematic and rational allocation of the cash consideration offered to the underlying transaction.

In May 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with FinishMaster, Inc. (“FinishMaster”) to exclusively use FinishMaster’s paint material supplies. The agreement continues from May 2014 until the Company purchases in aggregate $1,555,000 of FinishMaster products. In consideration for the Company’s exclusive use of FinishMaster’s products and fulfilling this purchase commitment, FinishMaster paid the Company $25,000, which was recorded as deferred vendor consideration, and FinishMaster will pay an additional $25,000 upon the achievement of purchase level milestones, as outlined in the agreement. Should the Company not complete a set purchase level milestone, the Company would be required to re-pay the $25,000 along with $11,475 compensation to FinishMaster. This initial amount paid will be recorded as a reduction of cost of services based on a systematic and rational allocation of the cash consideration offered to the underlying transaction.

Litigation

The Company is involved in certain legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. The Company is currently a party to several legal proceedings related to claims for payment that are currently accrued for in its financial statements as accrued liabilities, accounts or notes payable. Except for income tax contingencies (commencing April 1, 2009), the Company records accruals for contingencies to the extent that management concludes that the occurrence is probable and that the related amounts of loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. Material legal proceedings that are currently pending are as follows:

SSC is the plaintiff in a case filed against Douglas Lopez & Rumm, LLP, Diana Lopez and Dana Douglas on October 16, 2012 in the California Superior Court, Orange County, for legal malpractice for their failure to adequately represent SSC in its litigation against Connects Marketing for the installation of defective engines in SSC vehicles. The defendants filed a cross-complaint against SSC and Saleen for payment for legal services rendered in the amount of $10,000. Defendant Dana Douglas has filed bankruptcy, and all claims against her have been stayed. In May 2014, SSC settled this matter in exchange for payment from Defendant Diana Lopez of $15,000, via monthly payments. Payments are to continue through approximately September 2015, after which this matter will be dismissed.

SSC is the plaintiff in a case filed against Inland Empire Auto Body & Paint, Inc. (“Inland Empire”) on August 8, 2012 in the California Superior Court, Riverside County, for breach of contract related to several paint jobs performed by Inland Empire on SSC vehicles. In July 2014, SSC settled this matter in exchange for payment of $15,000 from Inland Empire, Auto Body & Paint, Inc., payable via monthly payments. Payments are to continue through approximately March 2016, after which this matter will be dismissed.

SSC is a defendant In conjunction with the Fee Reduction Agreement entered into with Michaels Law Group in January 2015, the case of Riverside County Transportation Commission v. Haupert, et.al., filed on November 8, 2013, inCompany has assigned the California Superior Court, Riverside County, for eminent domain of a portion of the property on which SSC’s offices are located. SSC’s landlord, Mr. Haupert, is undertaking the defense of this matter on SSC’s behalf; SSC bears no expense for this litigation. It is unclear what effect, if any, this litigation will have on SSC.rights to receive payments from Inland Empire to Michaels Law Group.

SSC is a defendant in a case filed by MSY Trading, Inc. on April 13, 2012 in the California Superior Court, Riverside County, that claimed breach of contract related to an engine installed by a third party vendor. The suit claimed $200,000 in damages plus interest, legal fees and costs of litigation. The Company filed a cross complaincomplaint against MSY Trading, Inc. for breach of warranty, negligence, and indemnification. On January 10, 2014, the Company settled this claim by agreeing to pay of $112,500 over a period of 18 months of which the Company paid $45,500 through August 2014. Subsequent to this date the Company has defaulted on payments. On October 30, 2014, a judgment was entered against SSC in the amount of $68,950, which the Company hadhas accrued for in accounts payable.

In February 2014, SSC received a Complaint from a bank alleging, among other matters, breach of contract due to non-timely payment of November and December 2013 principal amounts owed, which were paid as of December 31, 2013, and the occurrence of a change in control as a result of the Merger. In April 2014, the bank agreed to dismiss the suit in exchange for the payment of $124,000 that was applied towards principal and unpaid fees along with advance loan principal and interest for May, September and July 2014, and the Company’s agreement to pay the remaining recorded balance to the bank in August 2014. In August 2014, the bank agreed to extend this date by 90 days to November 2014 in exchange for $30,000 to be applied towards principal and interest on the loan. As of the date of this filing, the Company has not paid this balance and expects to be in default unless the bank agrees to another extension. The Company is currently in discussion with the bank to obtain another extension the outcome of which is uncertain.

In September 2014, the Company received a Complaint from Green Global Automotive B.V. (“GAA”) alleging causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, related to a European Distribution Agreement entered into in SeptemberDecember 2011 between GAA and Saleen Electric Automotive, Inc., which was merged into the Company in June 2013. The suit seeks contract and economic damages of $50,000 along with compensatory damages, restoration, lost profits and attorneys’ fees. Management is currently evaluating the merits of this case, if any, and is working to ascertain the impact on the Company’s financial statements, if any.

In SeptemberDecember 2014, the Company received a Complaint from Ford of Escondido for 1) claim and delivery of personal property, 2) money due on a contract, and 3) common count. The Company and Home Heller Ford, which was merged into Ford of Escondido, are parties to a supply agreement entered into in May 2013. Specifically, Ford of Escondido seeks payment of seven (7) Ford Mustangs for a total of $222,871 plus interest and attorneys’ fees, less any amounts to be credited to the Company pursuant to proceeds of sale. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company has included in accounts payable the cost of four (4) vehicles, which the Company believes are owed to Ford of Escondido and disagrees with Ford of Escondido’s number of vehicles and related amount owed. As such, the Company believes Ford of Escondido’s claims are without merit and has responded to the Complaint including claims that Ford of Escondido breached said supply agreement. There has been no response to the Company’s position and the outcome is uncertain; however, the Company believes this matter will not have a material impact, if any, on the Company’s financial statements.

Although the Company’s management currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial statements, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s views of these matters may change in the future.​

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes

The Company may prepay the Notes, provided that if the Notes are prepaid within 90 days or between 91 to 180 days of the issuance date,of up to $600,000 in additional Notes for a period up to June 26, 2015 under the Company would be required to pay 135% or 150%, respectively, ofsame terms as the face amount plus accrued interest. The Company may not prepay the Notes after 180 days of issuance. Further, upon a change in control the holder may request the Company to redeem each Note for 150% of the face amount plus accrued interest, or the holder may elect to convert outstanding principal and interest into common stock in accordance with the conversion provisions of each Note.

The Notes are convertible into shares of Common Stock at the option of the holder commencing on the 180^th day following the date of the Notes and ending on the later of the maturity date or date of full payment of principal and interest. The principal amount of the Note along with, at the holder’s option, any unpaid interest and penalties is convertible at a price per share equal to the greater of (a) 61% of the average of the lowest two trading prices of common stock during the 18 trading day period ending on the conversion date, and (b) $0.00005.June 2013 Notes. In addition, the conversion price is subject to standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or entersentered into a stock split of its common sharesSecond Amendment to 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes whereby the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As of the date of issuance and assuming thatJune 2013 Notes was amended to be the holder had the right to convert the Notes, the Notes would have been convertible into approximately 2,259,221 shares of Common Stock. Per agreement, the Company is required to reserve a sufficient number of shares of common stock for the conversion of these Notes, initially set as 8,815,000 shares of Common Stock.

As the initial conversion price reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the issuance date of the Notes, the Company determined that there was deemed a beneficial conversion feature associated with these Notes. As such, the Company will record $35,244 in the quarter ending December 31, 2014 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at the issuance date of the Notes in additional paid-in capital. The value of the beneficial conversion feature will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the Notes.

Amounts due under the 10% Note are convertible into shares of common stock at the lower of 58% of the lowest trading price of common stock during the 20 trading day period prior to (i) the conversion date and (ii) the execution date. In addition, the conversion price is subject to standard anti-dilution provisions whereby if the Company consummates a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or enters into a stock split of its common shares the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As of the date of issuance and assuming that the holder had the right to convert the Notes, the Notes would have been convertible into approximately 2,155,172 shares of Common Stock. Per agreement, the Company is required to reserve 7,000,000 shares of common stock for the conversion of this Note.

As the initial conversion price reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the issuance date of the Notes, the Company determined that there was deemed a beneficial conversion feature associated with these Notes. As such, the Company will record $36,207 in the quarter ending December 31, 2014 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at the issuance date of the Notes in additional paid-in capital. The value of the beneficial conversion feature will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the Notes.

The Notes are convertible into shares of Common Stock at the option of the holder at any time following the date of the Note and ending on the later of the maturity date or date of full payment of principal and interest. The principal amount of the Notes along with, at the holder’s option, any unpaid interest and penalties is convertible at a price per share equal to the greaterlesser of (a) 65% (or 60% in the event the Company’s stock price is less than $0.02 per share)$0.075 and (b) 70% of the average of the three lowest VWAP forVWAPs occurring during the 20twenty consecutive trading days prior toimmediately preceding the applicable conversion date and (b) $0.001. In addition,on which the note holders elects to convert all or part of the note. However, in no event shall the conversion price is subject to standard anti-dilution provisions whereby ifbe less than $0.02.

In conjunction with these amendments, on January 26, 2015 the Company consummatesentered into two 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes in the principal amount of $499,892 with two accredited investors who participated in the June 26, 2013 offering of which $98,708 was converted from a reorganization transaction, pays dividends or entersrevolver entered into a stock splitin November 2013 and owed as of its common sharesDecember 31, 2014 (see Note 5). The Company will characterize the conversion price would adjust proportionally. As of the date of issuance and assuming that the holder had the right to convert the Note, the Note would have been convertible into approximately 4,180,571 shares of Common Stock. Per agreement, the Company is required to reserve a sufficient number of shares of common stock for the conversion of these Notes of 8,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

As the initial conversion price reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s common stockconversion features of these additional notes as of thea derivative liability upon issuance date of the Note, the Company determined that there was deemed a beneficial conversion feature associated with the Note. As such, the Company will record $45,096 in the quarter ending December 31, 2014 representing the intrinsicinitial fair value of the beneficial conversionembedded feature at the issuance date of the Note in additional paid-in capital.determined to be $740,304. The value of the beneficial conversion feature will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the Note.

The Notes are convertible into shares of Common Stock at the option of the holder at any time following the date of the Note and ending on the later of the maturity date or date of full payment of principal and interest. The principal amount of the Notes along with, at the holder’s option, any unpaid interest and penalties is convertible at a price per share equal to the greater of (a) 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion and $0.00005. As of the date of issuance and assuming that the holder had the right to convert the Note, the Note would have been convertible into approximately 3,333,333 shares of Common Stock. Per agreement, the Company is required to reserve a sufficient number of shares of common stock for the conversion of these Notes of 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

As the initial conversion price reflected a price discount below the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the issuance date of the Note, the Company determined that there was deemedthis amount by using a beneficial conversion feature associated with these Notes. As such, the Company will record $40,000 in the quarter ending December 31, 2014 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature at the issuance date of the Note in additional paid-in capital. The value of the beneficial conversion feature will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the Note.

Stock Options

In October 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved the grant of options to two independent contractors to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares each of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 per share. The options fully vest immediately. The Company valued the options at $104,400 using theweighted-average Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model using the following assumptions: (i) fair market value of stock as of $0.03;the date of issuance of the Notes of $0.02; (ii) dividend yield of 0%; (iii) expected volatility of 100%128%; (iv) risk free rate of 2.25%.55%; and (v) expected term of 62.4 years. As such, the Company will record $740,304 as a derivative liability, of which $449,892 will be recorded as debt discount offsetting the Notes with $290,412 to be recorded as an expense. The valuation discount will be amortized as interest expense over the remaining term of the 3% Senior Secured Convertible Notes. In addition, the derivative liability will be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the operating results, financial condition and liquidity and cash flows of Saleen Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three and sixnine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013. The discussion and analysis that follows should be read together with the financial statements of Saleen Automotive, Inc. and subsidiaries and the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and are based upon judgments concerning various factors that are beyond our control. Such forward-looking statements include any expectation of earnings, revenues or other financial items; any statements regarding the use of working capital, anticipated growth strategies and the development of and applications for new technology; factors that may affect our operating results; statements concerning our customers and expansion of our customer base; statements concerning new products; statements related to future economic conditions or performance; and other matters that do not relate strictly to historical facts or statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. These statements are often identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” or “plan,” and similar expressions or variations. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to management. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, our ability to successfully achieve profitability and positive cash flows from operations, our ability to raise additional funds required to continue our operations and meet our planned business objectives, the dilutive impact of the sale of equity securities to obtain needed additional financing, the potential issuance of shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares that would result in a change of control of our company in connection with a financing transaction, the impact of changes in demand for our products, our success with new product development, our success with current dealers and our ability to expand our dealer base, our ability to maintain or grow our market share, our ability to obtain Ford Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro, Dodge Challenger and Tesla Model S platform vehicles, our effectiveness in managing development and manufacturing processes, and the other risks as set forth under “Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors” which are included in our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 as filed on June 30, 2014. These forward-looking statements represent our judgment as of the date hereof. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. New factors emerge from time to time, and their emergence is impossible for us to predict. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

General Overview

We design, develop, manufacture and sell high performance cars built from base chassis’ of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros, Dodge Challengers and Tesla Model S, as well as exotic sports cars.S. We are a low volume specialist vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing company focusing on the mass customization (the process of customizing automobiles that are mass produced by manufacturers (Ford, Chevrolet, Dodge and Tesla)) of OEM American Sportssports and Electric Carselectric vehicles and the production of high performance USA-engineered sports and racing cars. Saleen-branded products include a complete line of high performance and upgraded muscle and electric cars, automotive aftermarket specialty parts and lifestyle accessories. A high performance car is an automobile that is designed and constructed specifically for speed. The design and construction of a high performance car involves not only providing a capable power train but also providing the handling and braking systems to support it. Muscle cars are any of a group of American-made 2-door sports coupes with powerful engines designed for high performance driving. We are also planning to develop an American supercar along with hybrid and zero-emission vehicles for commercial applications and consumer markets.supercar. The term supercar describes an expensive (approximately $250,000 or more), limited production, fast or powerful (capable of reaching speeds in excess of 180 miles per hour) sports car with a centrally located engine. In August 2014, we launched and began producing a Saleen modified Tesla Model S sports car.

Our customers worldwide include muscle and high performance car enthusiasts, collectors, automotive dealers, exotic car retail dealers, television and motion picture production, and consumers in the luxury supercar and motorsports market. We plan to develop a network of company-owned branded stores to complement our existing retail dealer locations.

We utilize automobile manufacturers Ford, Chevrolet, Dodge and Tesla platform vehicles for our muscle and high performance vehicle production. All aftermarket parts and accessory products are engineered and manufactured exclusively by us. Our main retail outlets for our products are authorized Ford, ChevroletChevrolert, Dodge and Dodge dealers and we also retail our products with exotic car dealers.

We plan to operate as a global high performance automotive brand and expand our production, sales and marketing operations extensively within the markets of the USA and into multiple international markets. In March 2014, we entered into an agreement to distribute the full collection of Saleen automobiles in China. We also plan to open our own retail outlets, market our expertise in specialist engineering and design services to third party clients, develop our own motorsport program and introduce our next generation American supercar.

Merger

On May 23, 2013, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Saleen California Merger Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Florida Merger Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Saleen Automotive, Inc. (“Saleen Automotive”), SMS Signature Cars (“SMS” and together with Saleen Automotive, the “Saleen Entities”) and Steve Saleen (“Saleen” and together with the Saleen Entities, the “Saleen Parties”). The closing (the “Closing”) of the transactions (the “Merger”) occurred on June 26, 2013. At the Closing (a) Saleen California Merger Corporation was merged with and into SMS with SMS surviving as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries; (b) Saleen Florida Merger Corporation was merged with and into Saleen Automotive with Saleen Automotive surviving as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries; (c) holders of the then outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive received an aggregate of 554,057 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock, which was subsequently converted into 69,257,125 shares of our common stock and holders of the outstanding capital stock of SMS received no consideration for their shares; and (d) approximately 93% of the beneficial ownership of our common stock (on a fully-diluted basis) was owned, collectively, by Saleen Parties (including 341,943 shares of our Super Voting Preferred Stock, which was subsequently converted into 42,742,875 shares of our common stock, issued to Saleen pursuant to an Assignment and License Agreement) and the former holders of the outstanding capital stock of Saleen Automotive. As a result of the Merger we are solely engaged in the Saleen Entities’ business, Saleen Automotive’s officers became our officers and Saleen Automotive’s three directors became members of our five-member board of directors. On June 17, 2013, we consummated a merger with WSTY Subsidiary Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, pursuant to which we amended our articles of incorporation to change our name to Saleen Automotive, Inc. In October 2013, SMS effected an amendment to its articles of incorporation to change its name to Saleen Signature Cars. In January 2014, we effected an increase in the number of our common shares authorized to 500,000,000 and all the remaining shares of Super Voting Preferred Stock were converted into our common stock and the Super Voting Preferred Stock ceased to be a designated series of our preferred stock.

The Merger was accounted for as a reverse merger (recapitalization) with the Saleen Entities deemed to be the accounting acquirers, and our company deemed to be the legal acquirer. Accordingly, the following represents a discussion of the historical operations of the Saleen Entities prior to the Merger and that of the consolidated company following the Merger. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared as if we will continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements do not contain adjustments, including adjustments to recorded assets and liabilities, which might be necessary if we were unable to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

Information with respect to our critical accounting policies which we believe have the most significant effect on our reported results and require subjective or complex judgments of management are contained starting on page 31 in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 as filed on June 30, 2014.

Three Months Ended September 30,December 31, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30,December 31, 2013

Our revenue, operating expenses, and net loss for the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2013 were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation:

Revenues: Revenue consists of sales of high performance vehicles and aftermarket retail parts and design services.parts. Our revenue from high performance muscle car vehicles generally includes the base chassis (Mustang, Camaro or Challenger), on which we normally obtain a small margin, and production conversion of the base Mustang, Camaro, Challenger and Tesla Model S chassis into a Saleen OEM high performance sports car.vehicle. Parts represent aftermarket retail sales of Saleen lifestyle accessories and Saleen-branded products and automotive aftermarket specialty parts sold to our base of over 25,000 loyal Saleen automotive vehicle enthusiasts in the U.S. and overseas. Additionally, many of these parts and accessories are marketed and sold to the owners of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros and Dodge Challengers.

Total revenues for the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 were $866,524,$536,895, a decrease of $669,740$470,284 or 44%47% from $1,536,264$1,007,179 for the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2013. The decrease relates primarily to lower Mustang sales from lessdue to 1) the significant model changes made by Ford to the base Mustang chassis, which requires us to make significant design and tooling modifications to our Saleen Mustang, 2) no availability of the 2015 Ford Mustang base chassis, coupled with Saleen authorized dealers preference to place orders foras Ford just recently began shipment of the 2015 Saleen Mustang models instead ofin November 2014, and 3) traditionally from November through mid-January production in the 2014 model. Sales during the three months ended September 30, 2014 were also negatively impacted from availability of Mustang chassis, as starting in May 2014, Ford discontinued production of the 2014 Mustangs in order to switchauto industry slows due to the new 2015 model, which represents a major model changeholidays and willthe subsequent temporary shut down of plants and shipping causing delivery of cars to be available to the Company starting in mid to late November 2014.interrupted. During the same period in the prior year, the change from the 2013 to 2014 Mustang model year was minimal requiring little change to our Saleen Mustang and the supply of vehicles was not as disruptive. Based on current orders for the 2015 Saleen Mustang models, we anticipate an increase in volume for the Saleen Mustang and just recently started shipping our Saleen Mustang White Label models in February 2015.

Cost of Goods Sold: Cost of goods sold consists of five major categories: base chassis, material, overhead, labor and purchased process services. Chassis costs relate to the purchased Ford Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro or Dodge Challenger vehicles. Material cost relates to the purchase of conversion parts used in the production of our high performance vehicles, and procurement of aftermarket parts, which are manufactured by third party suppliers using our proprietary tools and molds developed by us. Overhead costs include costs associated with manufacturing support, shop and warehouse supplies and expenses, small tools and equipment and other related warehouse and production costs. Our labor costs include the cost of personnel directly related to the production of our high performance vehicles and logistics of warehousing and shipping of our aftermarket parts. Purchased process services relate to the subcontracting of specific manufacturing processes to outside contractors.

Total costs of goods sold for the three months ended December 31, 2014 were $552,788, a decrease of $220,679 or 29% from $773,467 of costs of goods sold for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in the volume of vehicle sales during the three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Gross Margin: Gross Margin from the sale of vehicles and parts decreased $249,605 to a net loss on margin of $15,893 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from a gross margin of $233,712 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in gross margin reflects the lower sales volume as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Research and Development Expenses: Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred and represent engineering and design salaries and benefits and costs incurred in the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products and processes.

Research and development expenses decreased by $59,710, or 29%, to $144,316 during the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $204,206 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The decrease is primarily due to lower expenses related to outside services, as we expanded our internal engineering team, which requires less outside development.

Sales and Marketing Expense: Sales and marketing expenses relate to sales and marketing salaries and benefits, including our regional sales representatives, and costs incurred to promote our existing and new products, such as attending car shows and promotion through other media outlets, along with new car sales expenses such as commissions and incentives, and costs related to investor relations.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $18,437, or 7%, to $232,666 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $251,103 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. Excluding $39,042 of non-cash stock based compensations related to employee grants of stock options during the three months ended December 31, 2014, sales and marketing expenses decreased $57,479 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to 1) lower car show expenses, and 2) lower public relations expenses from less use of outside services, offset somewhat by higher salaries due to expansion of in-house sales personnel. There were no stock options issued during the three months ended December 31, 2013.

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses include expenses for administrative salaries, including executive, finance/accounting, information personnel and administrative support staff and benefits. Other general and administrative costs also include occupancy costs of our facilities, travel and entertainment, auto, insurance, stock compensation, other office support costs and professional fees, including outside accounting/audit, legal, and investor fund raising advisory services.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $227,297, or 22%, to $801,757 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $1,029,054 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. Excluding non-cash stock based compensation of $179,082 for the three months ended December 31, 2014, general and administrative expense decreased $406,379 during the three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to 1) lower professional fees of $94,805, 2) one time settlement costs of $115,000 incurred during the three months ended December 31, 2013 that was not incurred during the three months ended December 31, 2014, 3) less auto, travel and entertainment costs of $54,611, and 4) lower salaries from decrease in general and administrative personnel. There were no grants of stock options during the three months ended December 31, 2013.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense: Depreciation and amortization expense relates to our depreciating and amortizing costs incurred for leasehold improvements, equipment and tooling. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $22,020, or 118%, to $40,608 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $18,588 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. This was primarily due to increased spending on tooling used in production.

Interest Expense: Interest expense increased by $568,484 or 306% to $754,488 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $186,004 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to $664,222 of non-cash interest expense during the three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $107,008 of non-cash interest expense during the three months ended December 31, 2013. Non-cash interest relates to the amortization of the convertible debt discount on our convertible notes. 

Private Placement Costs: In conjunction with the issuance of convertible notes from October to December 2014, the conversion features of such notes were bifurcated from the notes and recorded as derivative liability. The Company recorded a $1,064,572 derivative liability with an offsetting charge to valuation discount of $482,225 with the remainder of $582,347 recorded as an expense included in other income (expense) during the three months ended December 31, 2014. We incurred no similar expense during the three months ended December 31, 2013.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability: In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of certain convertible notes issued by the Company was separated from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative instrument. The conversion feature of these notes was characterized as a derivative liability that was re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value recognized as a gain or loss in our statement of operations. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, we recorded a $129,182 gain due to the change in the derivative liability as compared to a loss of $125,026 for the three months ended December 31, 2013.

Net Loss: Net loss increased by $903,352, or 59%, to a net loss of $2,442,893 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from a net loss of $1,539,541 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The increase in net loss primarily reflects the lower gross margin experienced coupled with an increase in other expenses related to interest and private placement costs offset by a decrease in operating expenses and favorable change in our derivative liability.

Nine months Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2013

Our revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the nine months ended December 31, 2013 were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation:

Revenues: Revenue consists of sales of high performance vehicles and aftermarket retail parts. Our revenue from high performance muscle car vehicles generally includes the base chassis (Mustang, Camaro or Challenger), on which we normally obtain a small margin, and production conversion of the base Mustang, Camaro, Challenger and Tesla Model S chassis into a Saleen high performance vehicle. Parts represent aftermarket retail sales of Saleen lifestyle accessories and Saleen-branded products and automotive aftermarket specialty parts sold to our base of Saleen automotive vehicle enthusiasts in the U.S. and overseas. Additionally, many of these parts and accessories are marketed and sold to the owners of Ford Mustangs, Chevrolet Camaros and Dodge Challengers.

Total revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 were $3,072,596, a decrease of $377,279 or 11% from $3,449,875 for the nine months ended December 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily driven by the availability of Ford Mustang chassis, which was negatively impacted revenues starting in May 2014, as Ford discontinued production of the 2014 Mustangs in order to switch to the new 2015 model, which represented a major model change requiring us to make significant design and tooling modifications to our Saleen Mustang. In addition, due to the change in model years, Ford stopped producing the 2014 models in May 2014 and did not start to ship the 2015 models until November 2014, which caused a significant decrease in the availability of chassis. During the same period in the prior year, the change from the 2013 to 2014 Mustang model year was minimal requiring little change and the supply of vehicles was not disruptive. Based on current orders for the 2015 Saleen Mustang model,models, we anticipate an increase in volume for the Saleen Mustang over the next twelve months as compared to the same periodand just recently started shipping our Saleen Mustang White Label models in the prior year.February 2015.

Cost of Goods Sold: Cost of goods sold consists of five major categories: base chassis, material, overhead, labor and purchased process services. Chassis costs relate to the purchased Ford Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro or Dodge Challenger vehicles. Material cost relates to the purchase of conversion parts used in the production of our high performance vehicles, and procurement of aftermarket parts, which are manufactured by third party suppliers using our proprietary tools and molds developed by us. Overhead costs include costs associated with manufacturing support, shop and warehouse supplies and expenses, small tools and equipment and other related warehouse and production costs. Our labor costs include the cost of personnel related to the production of our high performance vehicles and logistics of warehousing and shipping our aftermarket parts. Purchased process services related to the subcontracting of specific manufacturing processes to outside contractors.

Total costs of goods sold for the threenine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 were $769,990,$2,725,378, a decrease of $464,018$127,287 or 38%4% from $1,234,008$2,852,665 of costs of goods sold for the threenine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreased vehiclelower volume of sales during the threenine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Gross Margin: Gross Margin from the sale of vehicles and parts decreased $205,722by $249,992 to $96,534,$347,218, or 68%42%, for a gross margin of 11% for the threenine months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 from a gross margin of $302,256,$597,210, or 20%17%, for the threenine months ended September 30,December 31, 2013. The decrease in gross margin reflects the decrease in sales volume as compared to the same period in the prior year along with higher costs incurred to obtain the 2014 Mustang chassis due to short supply of such vehicles, as Ford discontinued production of the 2014 Mustang in May 2014 to switch to the 2015 model.

Research and Development Expenses: Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred and represent engineering and design salaries and benefits and costs incurred in the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products and processes.

Research and development expenses increased by $59,548, or 31%, to $250,130 during the three months ended September 30, 2014 from $190,582 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase is primarily due to our expanded engineering team and development of our new Saleen Tesla high performance electric vehicle. In addition, research and development costs included $47,972 of non-cash stock based compensations related to employee grants of stock options during the three months ended September 30, 2014. There were no stock options issued during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Sales and Marketing Expense: Sales and marketing expenses relate to sales and marketing salaries and benefits, including our regional sales representatives, and costs incurred to promote our existing and new products, such as attending car shows and promotion through other media outlets, along with new car sales expenses such as commissions and incentives, and costs related to investor relations.

Sales and marketing expenses remained relatively consistent as they decreased by $12,789, or 3%, to $443,767 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from $456,556 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Excluding $190,272 of non-cash stock based compensations related to employee grants of stock options during the three months ended September 30, 2014, sales and marketing expenses decreased $203,061 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower car show expenses. There were no stock options issued during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses include expenses for administrative salaries, including executive, finance/accounting, information personnel and administrative support staff and benefits. Other general and administrative costs also include occupancy costs of our facilities, travel and entertainment, auto, insurance, stock compensation, other office support costs and professional fees, including outside accounting/audit, legal, and investor fund raising advisory services.

General and administrative expenses increased by $15,591, or 2%, to $792,062 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from $776,471 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Excluding non-cash stock based compensation of $115,731 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, general and administrative expense decreased $100,140 during the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower professional fees. There were no grants of stock options during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense: Depreciation and amortization expense relates to our depreciating and amortizing costs incurred for leasehold improvements, equipment and tooling. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $37,232, or 140%, to $63,806 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from $26,574 for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Interest Expense: Interest expense increased by $443,809 or 347% to $571,748 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from $127,939 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase is primarily attributable to $478,223 of non-cash interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to $140,899 of non-cash interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2013. Non-cash interest relates to the amortization of the convertible debt discount on our convertible notes.

Private Placement Costs: In conjunction with the issuance of 8% convertible notes in September 2014, the conversion features of such notes was bifurcated from the notes and recorded as derivative liability. The Company recorded a $241,882 derivative liability with an offsetting charge to valuation discount of $156,000 with the remainder of $85,882 recorded as an expense included in other income (expense) during the three months ended September 30, 2014. We incurred no similar expense during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability: In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of certain convertible notes issued by the Company was separated from the host contract (i.e., the notes) and recognized as a derivative instrument. The conversion feature of these notes was characterized as a derivative liability that was re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value recognized as a gain or loss in our statement of operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a $27,156 gain due to the change in the derivative liability as compared to a gain of $140,899 for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Net Income (Loss): Net loss increased by $948,739, or 84%, to a net loss of $2,083,705 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 from a net loss of $1,134,966 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in net loss primarily reflects the lower gross margin experienced coupled with an increase in operating and interest expenses.

Six Months Ended September 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2013