UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2017

 

OR

 

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

 

Commission File Number: 000-24249

 

Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 22-2919486

(State or other jurisdiction
of

Incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

Morris Corporate Center 1, Building AC

300 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ 07054

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

 

(844) 405-9655(855) 776-6419

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer [  ]Accelerated filer [  ]Non-accelerated filer [  ]Smaller reporting company [X]
  

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

Emerging Growth Company [  ]   

  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

 

Class 

Shares Outstanding May 5,

November 3, 2017

 
Common stock, $0.01 par value  8.788,60426,849,025 

 

 

 

 
 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Page No.
 PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION3
   
Item 1.Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements3
   
 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31,September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 20163
   
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss for the three-monththree- and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)4
   
 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’sStockholders’ Equity for the three- monthnine-month period ended March 31,September 30, 2017 (unaudited)5
   
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three-nine- month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)6
   
 Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements7
   
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2430
   
Item 4.Controls and Procedures3242
   
 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION43
   
Item 1.Legal Proceedings3343
   
Item 1A.Risk Factors3343
   
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds3343
   
Item 6.Exhibits3444
   
Signatures3645

 

 

2

 

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

Item 1. Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
 (unaudited)     (unaudited)    
             
ASSETS                
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $7,126  $602  $11,703  $602 
Accounts receivable, net  2,265   2,209   2,803   2,209 
Other current assets  1,268   1,415   1,267   1,415 
Current assets from discontinued operations  -   14   -   14 
Total current assets  10,659   4,240   15,773   4,240 
Property and equipment, net  770   929   668   929 
Other intangible assets, net  35,545   36,358   33,919   36,358 
Other long-term assets  1   251   31   251 
Total assets $46,975  $41,778  $50,391  $41,778 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable $2,643  $2,326  $704  $2,326 
Accrued salary and bonus  1,099   3,551   984   3,551 
Other accrued expenses  6,536   6,236   5,331   6,236 
Current liabilities from discontinued operations  2,746   4,128   1,283   4,128 
Total current liabilities  13,024   16,241   8,302   16,241 
Contingent consideration  1,326   7,254   1,157   7,254 
Long-term debt, net of debt discount  4,364   7,908   -   7,908 
Other long-term liabilities  3,692   3,844   4,554   3,844 
Total liabilities  22,406   35,247   14,013   35,247 
                
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)                
                
Stockholders’ equity:                
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding  -   -   -   - 
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 6,788,059 and 2,230,506 shares issued, respectively; 6,723,709 and 2,176,252 shares outstanding, respectively  68   22 
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 22,975,754 and 2,230,506 shares issued, respectively; 22,911,404 and 2,176,252 shares outstanding, respectively  230   22 
Additional paid-in capital  143,342   127,736   164,611   127,736 
Accumulated deficit  (117,170)  (119,584)  (126,792)  (119,584)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  -   -   -   - 
Treasury stock, at cost (64,350 and 54,254 shares, respectively)  (1,671)  (1,643)  (1,671)  (1,643)
Total stockholders' equity  24,569   6,531 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $46,975  $41,778 
Total stockholders’ equity  36,378   6,531 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $50,391  $41,778 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.statements

 

 

3

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)LOSS

(unaudited, in thousands, except for per share data)

 

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Revenue, net $3,470  $3,035 
Cost of revenue (excluding amortization of $813 and $970 for the three months, respectively)  1,771   1,179 
Gross profit  1,699   1,856 
Operating expenses:        
Sales and marketing  1,136   1,547 
Research and development  306   323 
General and administrative  1,522   2,816 
Acquisition related amortization expense  813   970 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  - 
Total operating expenses  (1,999)  5,656 
         
Operating income (loss)  3,698   (3,800)
Interest expense  (254)  (203)
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (1,547)  - 
Other (loss) income , net  (36)  6 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before tax  1,861   (3,997)
Provision for income taxes  3   9 
Income (loss) from continuing operations  1,858   (4,006)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  556   (780)
Net income (loss) $2,414  $(4,786)
         
Net Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) $2,414  $(4,786)
         
Basic income (loss) per share of common stock:        
From continuing operations $0.43  $(2.26)
From discontinued operations  0.13   (0.44)
Net income (loss) per basic share of common stock $0.56  $(2.69)
         
Diluted income (loss) per share of common stock:        
From continuing operations $0.42  $(2.26)
From discontinued operations  0.13   (0.44)
Net income (loss) per diluted share of common stock $0.55  $(2.69)
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding:        
Basic  4,294   1,776 
Diluted  4,384 �� 1,776 

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Revenue, net $4,202  $3,316  $11,527  $9,963 
Cost of revenue (excluding amortization of $813 and $970 for the three months and $2,439 and $2,909 for the nine months, respectively)  2,069   1,846   5,719   4,866 
Gross profit  2,133   1,470   5,808   5,097 
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing  1,816   1,282   4,507   4,186 
Research and development  483   659   1,202   1,339 
General and administrative  2,116   2,858   6,431   7,655 
Acquisition related amortization expense  813   970   2,439   2,909 
Asset impairment  -   3,363   -   3,363 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  -   (1,174)  (5,776)  (1,174)
Total operating expenses  5,228   7,958   8,803   18,278 
                 
Operating loss  (3,095)  (6,488)  (2,995)  (13,181)
Interest expense  (40)  (539)  (433)  (1,601)
Loss on extinguishment of debt  -   -   (4,278)  - 
Other (loss) income, net  (294)  4   (414)  14 
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (3,429)  (7,023)  (8,120)  (14,768)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes  (42)  173   (340)  (54)
Loss from continuing operations  (3,387)  (7,196)  (7,780)  (14,714)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  71   (297)  572   101 
Net loss $(3,316) $(7,493) $(7,208) $(14,613)
                 
Net Loss and Comprehensive Loss $(3,316) $(7,493) $(7,208) $(14,613)
                 
Basic and Diluted (loss) income per share of common stock:                
From continuing operations $(0.15) $(3.96) $(0.65) $(8.16)
From discontinued operations  0.00   (0.16)  0.05   0.06 
Net loss per basic and diluted share of common stock $(0.15) $(4.13) $(0.60) $(8.10)
                 
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding:                
Basic  22,028   1,816   12,022   1,803 
Diluted  22,028   1,816   12,022   1,803 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.statements

 

4

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited, in thousands)

 

  For The Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2017 
  Shares  Amount 
Common stock:        
Balance at December 31, 2016  2,230  $22 
Common stock issued  34   1 
Common stock issued through offerings  2,793   28 
Shares converted in debt exchange  1,731   17 
Balance at March 31, 2017  6,788   68 
Treasury stock:        
Balance at December 31, 2016  54   (1,643)
Treasury stock purchased  10   (28)
Balance at March 31, 2017  64   (1,671)
Additional paid-in capital:        
Balance at December 31, 2016      127,736 
Common stock issued through offerings, net of expenses      9,005 
Issuance of warrants      1,861 
Shares converted in debt exchange      4,682 
Stock-based compensation expense      58 
Balance at March 31, 2017      143,342 
Accumulated deficit:        
Balance at December 31, 2016      (119,584)
Net income      2,414 
Balance at March 31, 2017      (117,170)
         
Total stockholders’ equity     $24,569 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

5

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities        
Net income (loss) $2,414  $(4,786)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  972   1,257 
Realignment accrual accretion  -   16 
Interest accretion  231   203 
Provision for bad debt  34   89 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  21   - 
Mark to market on derivatives  42   - 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  1,547   - 
Reversal of severance accrual  (2,034)  - 
Stock-based compensation  58   67 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  - 
Other (gains), losses and expenses, net  -   (13)
Other changes in assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable  (90)  4,270 
Decrease in unbilled receivable  -   16 
Decrease (increase) in other current assets  161   (460)
Decrease in other long-term assets  250   689 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable  295   (1,887)
Decrease in unearned contract revenue  -   (11)
Decrease in accrued salaries and bonus  (1,639)  (372)
Decrease in accrued liabilities  (648)  (2,566)
Increase (decrease) in long-term liabilities  13   (482)
Net cash used in operating activities  (4,149)  (3,970)
         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities        
Purchase of property and equipment  -   - 
Net cash used in investing activities  -   - 
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses  10,701   - 
Cash paid for repurchase of restricted shares  (28)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  10,673   - 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  6,524   (3,970)
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning  602   8,310 
Cash and cash equivalents – ending $7,126  $4,340 
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 
  For The Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 2017 
  Shares  Amount 
Common stock:        
Balance at January 1  2,230  $22 
Common stock issued  34   1 
Common stock issued through offerings  13,568   135 
Shares issued in debt exchange  3,795   38 
Exercise of warrants 3,348   34 
Balance at September 30  22,975   230 
Treasury stock:        
Balance at January 1  54   (1,643)
Treasury stock purchased  10   (28)
Balance at September 30  64   (1,671)
Additional paid-in capital:        
Balance at January 1      127,736 
Common stock issued through offerings, net of expenses      13,984 
Issuance of warrants      7,553 
Shares issued in debt exchange      11,605 
Exercise of warrants      3,256 
Stock-based compensation expense      477 
Balance at September 30      164,611 
Accumulated deficit:        
Balance at January 1      (119,584)
Net loss      (7,208)
Balance at September 30      (126,792)
         
Total stockholders’ equity     $36,378 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.statements

 6

 5

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities        
Net loss $(7,208) $(14,613)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  2,813   3,490 
Realignment accrual accretion  -   29 
Interest accretion  312   1,601 
Provision for bad debt  (6)  482 
Mark to market on warrants  401   - 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  117   - 
Mark to market on derivatives  61   - 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  4,278   - 
Reversal of severance accrual  (2,034)  - 
Non-employee share-based payment  216   - 
Stock-based compensation  477   109 
Asset impairment  -   3,363 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  (1,174)
Other gains and expenses, net  -   (4)
Other changes in assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease  in accounts receivable  (588)  4,639 
Decrease in unbilled receivable  -   16 
Decrease in other current assets  162   1,272 
Decrease in other long-term assets  220   754 
Decrease in accounts payable  (2,208)  (761)
Decrease in unearned contract revenue  -   (11)
Decrease in accrued salaries and bonus  (1,805)  (685)
Decrease in accrued liabilities  (2,210)  (4,561)
Decrease in long-term liabilities  (106)  (563)
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,884)  (6,617)
         
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities        
Purchase of property and equipment  (29)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (29)  - 
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses  24,042   - 
Cash paid for repurchase of restricted shares  (28)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  24,014   - 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  11,101   (6,617)
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning  602   8,310 
Cash and cash equivalents – ending $11,703  $1,693 
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

 6

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes (the interim financial statements)“Interim Financial Statements”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. (the Company“Company” or Interpace)“Interpace”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Interpace Diagnostics Corporation, Interpace Diagnostics Lab, Inc. and Interpace Diagnostics, LLC, and related notes as included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)(“SEC”) on March 31, 2017, as amended on April 28, 2017. The condensed interim financial statementsInterim Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)(“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The condensed interim financial statementsInterim Financial Statements include all normal recurring adjustments that, in the judgment of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such interim financial statements. Discontinued operations include the Company’s wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries: Group DCA, LLC or (“Group DCA;DCA”); InServe Support Solutions (Pharmakon)(“Pharmakon”); and TVG, Inc. (TVG,(“TVG”, dissolved December 31, 2014) and its Commercial Services (CSO)Organization (“CSO”) business unit which was sold on December 22, 2015. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating resultsResults of operations, cash flows and comprehensive income for the three-month periodthree and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

 

2.LIQUIDITY

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis that assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, and thatwhich contemplates the continuity of operations, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As of March 31,September 30, 2017, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $7.1$11.7 million, net accounts receivable of $2.3$2.8 million, total current assets of $10.7$15.8 million and total current liabilities of $13.0$8.3 million. For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017, the Company had a net incomeloss of $2.4$7.2 million and cash used in operating activities was $4.1$12.9 million.

 

On December 22, 2016,During the Company completed a registered direct public offering, which resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.9 million, (net proceeds of $1.7 million after expenses) of which approximately $1.33 million was used to repay secured debt.

Innine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company closed on threefour equity offerings raising gross proceeds of $12.2$27.9 million. The details are as follows:

 

 On January 6, 2017, the Company completed a registered direct public offering or the Second(the “Second Registered Direct Offering,Offering”), to sell 630,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $6.81 per share to certain institutional investors, which resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4.2 million.
   
On January 25, 2017, the Company completed a registered direct public offering or the Third(the “Third Registered Direct Offering,Offering”), to sell 855,000 shares of its common stock and a concurrent private placement of warrants to purchase 855,000 shares of its common stock or the Warrants,(the “Concurrent Warrants”), to the same investors participating in the Third Registered Direct Offering, or (the Private Placement)(or the “Private Placement”). The Concurrent Warrants and the shares of the Company’sits common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Concurrent Warrants were not registered under the Securities Act and were sold pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares of common stock sold in the Third Registered Direct Offering and the Concurrent Warrants issued in the concurrent Private Placement were issued separately but sold together at a combined purchase price of $4.69 per share of common stock and accompanying Concurrent Warrant. The 855,000 unregistered Concurrent Warrants also have an exercise price of $4.69 and have a five-year term. The Third Registered Direct Offering and the Private Placement together resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4$4.0 million. The Company also used approximately $1.0 million of the proceeds to satisfy the severance obligations due to five former senior executives. See Note 6- Severance.

 

7

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited) 

 

 On February 8, 2017, the Company completed an underwritten, confidentially marketed public offering or the CMPO,(“CMPO”), to sell 1,200,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $3.00 per share. In addition, the Company granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 9% of the total number of shares of common stock sold by the Company in the CMPO, solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. The CMPO resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $3.9 million, including the over-allotment.
On June 21, 2017, pursuant to its S-1 filing of its preliminary prospectus to register shares on May 22, 2017, as amended thereafter, the Company completed a public offering (the “Offering”) for 9,900,000 shares of common stock together with an equal number of common warrants (the “Base Warrants”), to purchase shares of its common stock (and the shares of common stock that are issuable from time to time upon exercise of the common warrants) for $1.10 per share. Each Base Warrant upon exercise at a price of $1.25 will result in the issuance of one share of common stock to the holder. A public trading market for the Base Warrants was established on July 5, 2017 on the OTC market under the trading symbol IDGGW. As part of the Offering, which closed on June 21, 2017, the related underwriters purchased the full over-allotment of 1,875,000 Base Warrants available to them for the specified $.01 per warrant. 2,600,000 of Pre-Funded Warrants were also sold at the specified $1.09 per warrant. The combined gross proceeds of the Offering totaled $13.7 million with approximately $12.3 million of net funds available to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and other stock issuance expenses. As of July 7, 2017 all of the 2,600,000 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised for the $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued. On July 31, the Company and the underwriters closed on the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase an additional 875,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.09 per share for gross proceeds of $0.960 million.

 

 8

On March 23,

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

During September 2017 the Company received approximately $0.9 million from the exercise of 747,800 Base Warrants issued as part of the Offering.

Subsequent to September 2017 the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”)received approximately $6.2 million from the exercise of BaseWarrants issued as part of the Offering, as follows:

During October 2017 the Company received approximately $1.2 million from the exercise of approximately 925,000 Base Warrants.
On October 12, 2017 the Company entered into an agreement with certain holders of Base Warrants to exercise 4 million Base Warrants at the exercise price of $1.25 in exchange for 3.2 million additional private placement warrants with an exercise price of $1.80, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $5.0 million. The new warrants may not be exercised for six months from the issue date and expire in five and one-half years from their issuance date.

As part of our acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc., with an institutional investor (the “Investor”). Prior to the Company entering into the Exchange Agreement, the Investor acquired that certain Non-Negotiable Subordinated Secured Promissory Note,we issued a non-negotiable subordinated secured, non-interest bearing, promissory note, dated as of October 31, 2014, as amended (the “RedPath Note”), issued by the Company and the Company’s subsidiary, Interpace, LLC, in favor of RedPath Equityholder Representative, LLC (the “RedPath Equityholder Representative”) on behalf of the former equityholders of RedPath. The RedPath Note, which was entered into in connection with the Company’s acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc. in October 2014, had an aggregate principal amount of $9.34$10.7 million outstanding and was acquired by(the “RedPath Note”). In December 2016 we repaid $1.33 million in principal of the Investor for $8.87RedPath Note resulting in an outstanding balance of $9.34 million. The RedPath Equityholder Representative assigned all of its rights, titleNote was subsequently acquired by a single institutional investor (the “Investor”) for $8.87 million on March 22, 2017. Also on that date we and interest inthe Investor exchanged the RedPath Note to the Investor, including, but not limited to, its security interest in all of the assets of the Company and the assets of the Company’s subsidiaries.

Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Company and the Investor agreed to exchange the RedPath Note for (i) a senior secured convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million (the “Exchanged Convertible Note”), which was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, in accordance with its terms, and (ii) a senior secured non-convertible note with anin the aggregate principal amount of $3.55 million (the “Exchanged Non-Convertible Note” and collectively, the “Exchanged Notes”), for a combined aggregate principal amount of $8.87 million.

As of March 30, 2017, the Investor had converted approximately 80% of the Exchanged Convertible Note to common stock, converting $4.2 million of the Exchanged Convertible Note into approximately 1.7 million shares of common stock. On April 18, 2017, the Companywe and the Investor agreed to exchangeexchanged the Exchanged Non-Converttible Notesenior secured non-convertible note for a new$3.55 million of our senior secured convertible notenote. Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the senior secured convertible notes were converted in the same principal amount of $3.55 million. The investor then converted the new convertible note into approximately 1.6 millionfull for 3,795,429 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $2.20 per share. As a result of the note exchangesour common stock. We no longer have any outstanding secured debt, and subsequent conversions, the RedPath note was deemed paid in full. Accordingly, theany security interest hasinterests and liens related to our former secured debt have been terminated and the liens will be released upon proper termination filings.fully settled.

 

The Company entered into a Credit Agreement with SCM Specialty Finance Opportunities Fund, L.P. (the “Credit Agreement”) on September 28, 2016.

2016 for $1.2 million. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties in favor of the Lender and certain covenants, including, among other things, financial covenants relating to loan turnover rates, liquidity and revenue targets. As of March 31,September 30, 2017 the Company hadis renegotiating terms of the Credit Agreement and has not borrowed any funds under the Credit Agreement.

 

8

While the Company has made significant reductions insignificantly increased its cash balance and has eliminated its long term indebtedness, the Company isdoes not yetexpect to generate positive cash flow positiveflows from operations. Accordingly, due tooperations for the Company’s operating deficit and obligations the Company may require additional capital to meet its obligations. There is no guarantee that additional capital can be raised to fund operations and obligations in 2017 and beyond, if needed.year ending December 31, 2017. The Company intends to meet its capital needs by driving revenue growth, containing costs, entering into strategic alliances as well as exploring other options, including the possibility of raising additional debt or equity capital. These liquidity factors, among others, have raised substantial doubts about our abilitycapital as necessary. There is, however, no assurance the Company will be successful in meeting its capital requirements prior to continue as a going concern.becoming cash flow positive.

 9

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

3.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Estimates

 

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on historical experience, facts and circumstances available at the time, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Significant estimates include best estimate of selling price in multiple element arrangements, valuation allowances related to deferred income taxes, self-insurance loss accruals, allowances for doubtful accounts and notes, income tax accruals, acquisition accounting, assetuseful lives and impairments of long-lived assets and facilities realignment accruals. The Company periodically reviews these matters and reflects changes in estimates as appropriate. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

 

Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful AccountsRevenue Recognition

TheThrough the Company’s accounts receivablemolecular diagnostics business, the Company aims to provide physicians and patients with diagnostic options for detecting genetic and other molecular alterations that are generated using its proprietary tests.associated with gastrointestinal, endocrine and lung cancers, which are principally focused on early detection of patients at high risk of cancer. Customers in the Company’s molecular diagnostics business consist primarily of physicians, hospitals and clinics. Under current GAAP, we recognize revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement or contract exists; services have been rendered; the selling price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s services are fulfilledgenerally considered rendered upon completion of the test and review and release of the test results. In conjunction with fulfilling these services,results, at which time the Company bills the third-party payorpayer or hospital. We recognize revenue on an accrual basis when we are able to make a reasonable estimate of reimbursement at the time delivery is complete. In the first period in which revenue is accrued for a particular payer or test, there generally is a one-time increase in revenue. Until we have contracts with payers or can reasonably estimate the amount that will ultimately be received, we recognize the related revenue on the cash basis. Because the timing and amount of cash payments received from payers as well as one-time increases in revenue from newly accrued payers are difficult to predict, we expect that our revenue may fluctuate significantly in any given quarter.

The Company currently recognizes revenue and accounts receivable related to billings for Medicare and Medicare Advantage, and hospitals (direct-bill clients) on an accrual basis, net of contractual adjustment, as well as for hospitals (direct-bill clients), when collectability is reasonably assured. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between the list prices and the reimbursement rate set by Medicare and Medicare Advantage, or the amounts billed to hospitals. The Company records an Allowance for Doubtful accounts based

Specifically by test, PancraGEN® revenues have been recorded on the collection history for PancraGen® hospital roster billings (direct bill clients)accrual basis in each of these categories since its acquisition in 2014. ThyGenX® has been recorded on an accrual basis since its Medicare approval in 2015 in two of the payer categories, Medicare and Medicare Advantage, and ThyraMIR®, a newer test, approved for Medicare Advantage billings for PancraGen®in 2016, has been moved from cash basis to accrual basis in the same categories as ThyGenX, Medicare and ThyGenix®. Since Medicare has fixed reimbursement rates, there may be little or no Allowance for Doubtful Accounts associated with Medicare. For non-paying roster accounts, balances may be written off to bad debt after twelve months. Medicare Advantage accounts may be written off to bad debt after several appeals, which in some cases may take longer than twelve months.2017, effective in the current quarter. As of September 30, 2017 there are no revenues for the Company’s lung assay called RespriDX™.

 10

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

The Company also provides services toby way of commercial insurance carriers or governmental programs that domay or may not have a contract or coverage in place for its proprietary tests, which may or may not be covered bytests. As contracts and coverage progress for payers in these entities existing reimbursement policies. In addition,categories, the Company will evaluate their collection history to determine the appropriate time to begin to recognized specific payers on the accrual basis as well. Currently, all are recognized on the cash basis. The Company does not enter into direct agreements with patients that commit them to pay any portion of the cost of the tests in the event that their commercial insurance carrier or governmental program does not pay the Company for its services. Inservices; however, the absence of an agreement withCompany does offer patients that do not have adequate insurance coverage the patient, or other clearly enforceable legal rightopportunity to demand payment from commercial insurance carriers or governmental agencies, no accounts receivable is recognized. pay cash for our services at a reduced rate.

Accounts Receivable

The Company does not recordrecognizes Accounts Receivable as revenue is accrued, based upon its criteria for revenue recognition. The Company also records an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts based on the collection history for its accrual basis payer. For non-paying roster accounts, balances are generally written off after twelve months. Medicare and Medicare Advantage accounts are currently written off after eighteen months to allow for the commercial insurance or governmental programs since the revenue is recorded mainly on a cash basis.

9

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular informationappeal process, which in thousands, except per share amounts)some cases requires several appeals prior to collection.

 

Other Current Assets

 

Other current assets consisted of the following as of March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
Indemnification assets $875  $875  $875  $875 
Other receivables  361   325   247   325 
Other  32   215   145   215 
 $1.268  $1,415  $1,267  $1,415 

 

Long-Lived Assets, including Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

 

Finite-lived intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization of finite-lived acquired intangible assets is recognized on a straight-line basis, using the estimated useful lives of the assets of approximately two years to nine years in acquisition related amortization expense in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).loss.

 

The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized by reducing the recorded value of the asset to its fair value measured by future discounted cash flows. This analysis requires estimates of the amount and timing of projected cash flows and, where applicable, judgments associated with, among other factors, the appropriate discount rate. Such estimates are critical in determining whether any impairment charge should be recorded and the amount of such charge if an impairment loss is deemed to be necessary.

 11

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

Discontinued Operations

 

The Company accounts for business dispositions and its businesses held for sale in accordance with ASC 205-20, Discontinued Operations. ASC 205-20 requires the results of operations of business dispositions to be segregated from continuing operations and reflected as discontinued operations in current and prior periods. See Note 11,Discontinued Operations for further information.

 

Basic and Diluted Net(Loss) Income (Loss) per Share

A reconciliation of the number of shares of common stock used in the calculation of basic and diluted (loss) income (loss) per share for the three-monththree- and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

 

 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended 
 March 31,  September 30, September 30, 
 2017 2016  2017 2016 2017 2016 
Basic weighted average number of common shares  4,294   1,776   22,028   1,816   12,022   1,803 
Potential dilutive effect of stock-based awards  90   -  -  -  -  - 
Diluted weighted average number of common shares  4,384   1,776  22,028  1,816  12,022  1,803 

 

As a result of the Company’s debt exchanges discussed in Note 12, Long-Term Debt, the Company issued an additional 2.1 million shares of common stock in April 2017.

10

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following outstanding stock-based awards were excluded from the computation of the effect of dilutive securities on (loss) income (loss) per share for the following periods because they would have been anti-dilutive:

 

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Options  1,496   -   1,496   - 
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs)  84   103   84   103 
Restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs)  68   115   68   115 
Warrants  15,267   -   15,267   - 
  16,915  218  16,915  218 

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
Options  -   - 
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs)  85   131 
Restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs)  -   102 
Warrants  955   - 
   1,040   233 

 12

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

4.OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

The net carrying value of the identifiable intangible assets as of March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

 

   As of March 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016    As of September 30, 2017 As of December 31, 2016 
 Life Carrying Carrying  Life Carrying Carrying 
 (Years) Amount Amount  (Years) Value Value 
Diagnostic assets:                      
Asuragen acquisition:                      
Thyroid  9  $8,519  $8,519   9  $8,519  $8,519 
Pancreas  -   -   - 
Biobank  -   -   - 
RedPath acquisition:                      
Pancreas test  7   16,141   16,141   7   16,141   16,141 
Barrett’s test  9   18,351   18,351  9   18,351   18,351 
Total    $43,011  $43,011     $43,011  $43,011 
Diagnostic lab:                      
CLIA Lab  2.3  $609  $609   2.3  $609  $609 
                      
Accumulated Amortization    $(8,075) $(7,262)    $(9,701) $(7,262)
                      
Net Carrying Value    $35,545  $36,358     $33,919  $36,358 

 

Amortization expense was approximately $0.8 million and $1.0 million for the three-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $2.4 million and $2.9 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of our diagnostic assets begins upon launch of the product. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows, based on current assumptions of future product launches:

 

2017  2018  2019  2020  2021 
$4,272  $5,292  $5,292  $5,292  $4,908 
 2017 2018  2019  2020  2021 
$3,252 $3,252  $5,292  $5,292  $4,908 

 

5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company’sCompany's financial assets and liabilities reflected at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial statements include: cash and cash equivalents; short-term investments; accounts receivable; other current assets; accounts payable; and contingent consideration. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods, including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based upon observable inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values into three broad levels as follows:

 

 13

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 Level 1:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
   
 Level 2:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
   
 Level 3:Valuations which incorporate certainunobservable inputs that reflect management assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial instrumentsassets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth in the tables below:

 

 As of March 31, 2017 Fair Value Measurements  As of September 30, 2017 Fair Value Measurements 
 Carrying Fair As of March 31, 2017  Carrying Fair As of September 30, 2017 
 Amount Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3  Amount Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Assets:                               
Cash and cash equivalents:                                        
Cash $7,126  $7,126  $7,126  $-# $-  $11,703  $11,703  $11,703  $            -  $- 
 $7,126  $7,126  $7,126  $-  $-  $11,703  $11,703  $11,703  $-  $- 
Liabilities:                                        
Contingent consideration:                                        
Asuragen $1,561  $1,561  $-  $-  $1,561  $1,407  $1,407  $-  $-  $1,407 
Derivative liability:                    
Embedded conversion derivative $51  $51  $-  $-  $51 
Other long-term liabilities:                    
Warrant liability  733   733   -   -   733 
 $1,612  $1,612  $-  $-  $1,612  $2,140  $2,140  $-  $-  $2,140 

  

 11

 14

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

  As of December 31, 2016  Fair Value Measurements 
  Carrying  Fair  As of December 31, 2016 
  Amount  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents:                    
Cash $602  $602  $602  $-  $- 
  $602  $602  $602  $-  $- 
Liabilities:                    
Contingent consideration:                    
Asuragen $1,545  $1,545  $-  $-  $1,545 
RedPath  5,969   5,969   -   -   5,969 
  $7,514  $7,514  $-  $-  $7,514 

 

The fair value of cashCash and cash equivalents and marketable securities isare valued using market prices in active markets (level 1). As of March 31,September 30, 2017, the Company did not have any marketable securities in less active markets (level 2) or without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (level 3).

 

In connection with the acquisition of certain assets from Asuragen and the acquisition of RedPath, the Company recorded contingent consideration related to contingent payments and other revenue based payments. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration based on a probability-weighted income approach derived from revenue estimates. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. On March 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, the RedPath Equityholder Representative agreed to terminate all royalty and milestone rights under the contingent consideration agreement. As a result the Company reversed approximately $6.0 million in Redpath contingent consideration liabilities in the first quarter of 2017, of which $5.8 million was a reversal within operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss).Loss.

 

On March 23, 2017, in connection with the Company entering into the Exchange Agreement, related to the RedPath noteNote (See Note 12)2,Liquidity and Note 12,Long-Term Debt) with the Investor, an embedded conversion option derivative liability was recorded due to a certain embedded conversion feature. The embedded conversion option is considered a liability and valued using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model, the inputs for which include exercise price of the conversion feature, market price of the underlying common shares, expected term, volatility based on the Company’s historical market price, and the risk-free rate corresponding to the expected term of the Exchange Agreement. Any changes to the estimated fair value of this liability arewere recorded in Interest Expense. Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the Investor had fully converted all outstanding debt, and as a result there are no liabilities remaining subsequent to April 18, 2017.

 

A roll forwardOn June 21, 2017, the Company closed on an Offering (See Note 2,Liquidity), issuing both Pre-Funded Warrants and Underwriters Warrants to purchase 2,600,000 shares and 575,000 shares of the carryingCompany’s common stock, respectively. Both the Pre-Funded and Underwriters Warrants include a cash settlement feature in the event of certain circumstances. Accordingly, both the Pre-Funded and Underwriters Warrants are classified as liabilities, and were fair valued using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing Model, the inputs for which include exercise price of the respective warrants, market price of the underlying common shares, expected term, volatility based on the Company’s historical market price, and the risk-free rate corresponding to the expected term of the Exchange Agreement. Changes to the fair value of the contingent considerationwarrant liabilities were recorded to Other (loss) income, net. The Pre-Funded Warrants were fully exercised as of September 30, 2017 and alsotherefore the embedded conversion option from continuing operations from January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017 is as follows:

Company has no remaining liability associated with those warrants.

  2017 
              Cancellation       
     Initial        of Obligation/  Mark to    
  January 1,  Liability  Payments  Accretion  Conversions  Market  March 31, 
Asuragen $1,545     $(25) $41  $-  $-  $1,561 
Redpath  5,969       -   -   (5,969)  -   - 
Embedded conversion option  -   208   -       (199)  42   51 
  $7,514  $208  $(25) $41  $(6,168) $42  $1,612 

 

 12

 15

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

The following table sets forth

A roll forward of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the faircarrying value of the contingent consideration, embedded conversion option derivative liabilityand warrant liabilities from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017 is as of March 31, 2017:follows:

 

  March 31, 2017 
    
Market Price $2.63 
Exercise Price $2.44 
Risk-free interest rate  0.99%
Expected volatility  234.05%
Expected life in years  1.25 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%
  December 31, 2016  Initial Liability  Payments  Accretion  Cancellation
of Obligation/
Conversions Exercises
  Mark to Market  September 30, 2017 
Contingent consideration:                            
Asuragen $1,545      $(260) $122  $-  $-  $1,407 
Redpath  5,969       -   -   (5,969)  -   - 
Embedded conversion option  -   208   -   -   (269)  61   - 
Pre-Funded Warrants  -   2,247   -   -   (2,337)  90   - 
Underwriters Warrants  -   422   -   -   -   311   733 
  $7,514  $2,877  $(260) $122  $(8,575) $462  $2,140 

 

The Company considers carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

Certain of the Company’s non-financial assets, such as otherinstruments, which primarily consist of intangible assets and property and equipment, are not required to be measured at fair value when there is an indicator ofon a recurring basis and are reported at carrying value. However, on a periodic basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be fully recoverable (and at least annually for indefinite-lived intangible assets), non-financial instruments are assessed for impairment and, if applicable, written-down to and recorded at fair value, only when an impairment charge is recognized.considering market participant assumptions.

 

6.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

 

Due to the nature of the businesses in which the Company is engaged it is subject to certain risks. Such risks include, among others, risk of liability for personal injury or death to persons using products the Company promotes or commercializes. There can be no assurance that substantial claims or liabilities will not arise in the future due to the nature of the Company’s business activities and recent increases in litigation related to healthcare products. As part of the closeout of its Contract Sales Organization (CSO),CSO business, the Company seeks to reduce its potential liability under its service agreements through measures such as contractual indemnification provisions with customers (the scope of which may vary from customer to customer, and the performance of which is not secured) and insurance. The Company could, however, also be held liable for errors and omissions of its employees in connection with the services it performs that are outside the scope of any indemnity or insurance policy. The Company could be materially adversely affected if it were required to pay damages or incur defense costs in connection with a claim that is outside the scope of an indemnification agreement; if the indemnity, although applicable, is not performed in accordance with its terms; or if the Company’s liability exceeds the amount of applicable insurance or indemnity.

 16

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

The Company routinely assesses its litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and records its best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where the Company assesses the likelihood of loss as probable. The Company accrues for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, in the event the Company determines that a loss is not probable, but is reasonably possible, and it becomes possible to develop what the Company believes to be a reasonable range of possible loss, then the Company will include disclosures related to such matter as appropriate and in compliance with ASC 450. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that the losses could exceed the amounts already accrued, the Company will, as applicable, adjust the accrual in the period the determination is made, disclose an estimate of the additional loss or range of loss, indicate that the estimate is immaterial with respect to its financial statements as a whole or, if the amount of such adjustment cannot be reasonably estimated, disclose that an estimate cannot be made. As of March 31,September 30, 2017, the Company’sCompany's accrual for litigation and threatened litigation was not material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

13

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

In connection with the October 31, 2014 acquisition of RedPath, the Company assumed a liability for the Settlement Agreementsettlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) entered into by the former owners of RedPath with the DOJ.Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company is obligated to make payments to the Department of Justice (DOJ)DOJ for the calendar years ended December 31, 2014 through 2017, up to a cumulative maximum amount of $3.0 million.

 

Payments are due on March 31st following the calendar year thatin which the revenue milestones are achieved. In May 2016,2017, the Company renegotiated payment terms with the DOJ related to a $250,000$0.5 million payment due associated with performance in fiscal 2014 that2016. The negotiations resulted in an agreement that the Company pay $85,000$83,335 on July 31, 2016, $85,000 on October 31, 20163, 2017, and $80,000 on February 28,$83,333 for the five remaining months of 2017. The Company made payments of approximately $0.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017, the Company has accrued $625,000 related to$0.5 million for the Settlement Agreement based onremainder of these payments and its estimate of the potential liability.liability for 2017, based upon the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

 

Prolias Technologies, Inc. v. PDI, Inc.

 

On April 8, 2015, Prolias Technologies, Inc.(“Prolias”) filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) against the Company with the Superior Court of New Jersey (Morris County) (the “Court”) in a matter entitled Prolias Technologies, Inc. v. PDI, Inc. (Docket No. MRS-L-899-15). In the Complaint, Prolias allegesalleged that it and the Company entered into an August 19, 2013 Collaboration Agreement and a First Amendment thereto (collectively, the “Agreement”) whereby Prolias and the Company agreed to work in good faith to commercialize a diagnostic test known as “Thymira.” Thymira is a minimally invasive diagnostic test that is being developed to detect thyroid cancer. Prolias alleges in the Complaint that the Company wrongfully terminated the Agreement, breached obligations owed to it and committed torts. After various motions on October 13, 2016, the Company filed an application to enter final judgment and taxing of costs against Prolias. The Company requested that the Court enter final judgment against Prolias and for the CompanyCompany.

 17

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in the amount of $621,236, plus ten percent interest continuing to accrue on the principal balance of $500,000 unless and until paid, attorneys’ fees and costs of $390,769, and a declaratory judgment that Prolias is deemed to have executed and delivered to the Company a promissory note in the amount of $1,000,000 under Article 10.2(a) of the Collaboration Agreement. On November 17, 2016, the Court denied the Company’s application without prejudice and with leave to refile.thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

On February 16, 2017, the Company refiled its application for final judgment, and on March 9, 2017, the Superior Court of New Jersey entered a final judgment in the Company’s favor against Prolias for the sum of $636,053 plus ten percent interest continuing to accrue on the principal balance of $500,000 (per diem $136.99) unless and until paid. Final judgment was also entered in the Company’s favor, and against Prolias, declaring Prolias is deemed to have executed and delivered to the Company a promissory note in the amount of $1,000,000 and Prolias is obligated to repay the Company the principal amount and all interest in accordance with the terms of the promissory note and Article 10.2(a) of the Collaboration Agreement by and between Prolias and the Company. On March 17,April 3, 2017, the Company requested that the final judgment against Prolias bewas recorded as a statewide lien. No assurance, however, can be given that the Company will ever be able to recover on the judgment against Prolias.

 

Swann v. Akorn, Inc., and Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.

On May 27, 2016, Michael J. Swann, one of the Company’s former employees, filed a complaint against the Company in the Court of Common Pleas of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in South Carolina in a matter entitled Michael J. Swann v. Akorn, Inc.(“Akorn”), and Interpace Diagnostic Group Inc. (Civil Action No. 2016-CP-40-03362). In the complaint, Mr. Swann alleges, among other things, that he was discriminated against and wrongfully terminated as a member of a sales force marketing pharmaceutical products of Akorn, because of an illness suffered by Mr. Swann. Mr. Swann alleges that he was discriminated against in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act/Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act and the Family Medical Leave Act and seeks damages for back pay, reinstatement, front pay, compensatory and punitive damages in an amount not less than $300,000, attorney’s fees and costs. The Company denies that it is liable to Mr. Swann for any of the claims asserted and intends to vigorously defend itself against those claims. On May 10, 2017 the Company received a settlement letter and paid the plaintiff $3,000.

14

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

Severance

In 2015, in connection with the sale of the majority of the CSO business and the implementation of a broad-based program to maximize efficiencies and cut costs, the Company reduced headcount and incurred severance obligations to terminated employees that amounted to approximately $3.7 million.

During the first quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Company recorded additional severance obligations as it continued to right-size the organization and wind down its CSO business. The Company recorded obligations of $1.1 million, $0.5 million of which was recorded in continuing operations.

 

The severance liability as of December 31, 2016 was approximately $3.1 million, of which $2.2 million residesis classified in continuing operations and $0.9 million is in discontinued operations. In January 2017, five former executives agreed to a settlement of their severance obligations agreeing to 35% of the total amount due them. These remaining obligations were paid out in February 2017 in payments totaling approximately $1.0 million. As a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a reversal of expense of approximately $2.0 million.million in the first quarter of 2017. Within continuing operations, $1.5 million of expense was reversed and was recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss and $0.5 million was recorded in discontinued operations. The Company has no currently payable severance obligations as of March 31,September 30, 2017.

Parsippany Lease

Our corporate headquarters are located in Parsippany, New Jersey where we had been leasing approximately 23,000 square feet on an operating lease scheduled to run through June 2017. On May 24, 2017 the Company entered into a new lease with its Parsippany landlord. The lease is for a space of approximately 5,900 square feet and is for a period of sixty-three months commencing July 1, 2017 at an initial monthly obligation of approximately $13,000 per month subject to annual increases of fifty cents per square foot. The initial year of the lease has a two-month rent abatement period. The lease has an early termination date of June 30, 2020 at the option of the Company, provided at least 12 months’ notice is given in advance.

Pittsburgh Lease

On September 26, 2017 the Company renewed its lease for its Pittsburgh laboratory for an additional three months. The lease is for 20,000 square feet of laboratory and office space and now ends on June 30, 2018. The lease obligation remains at $32,500 per month for the full term of the lease.

 18

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

7.ACCRUED EXPENSES AND LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

Other accrued expenses consisted of the following as of March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

  March 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Accrued royalties $863  $711 
Indemnification liability  875   875 
Contingent consideration  235   260 
Rent payable  57   110 
DOJ settlement  625   80 
Accrued professional fees  1,567   1,746 
Taxes payable  467   526 
Unclaimed property  565   565 
All others  1,282   1,363 
  $6,536  $6,236 

 

Long-term

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Accrued royalties $931  $711 
Indemnification liability  875   875 
Contingent consideration  250   260 
Rent payable  18   110 
DOJ settlement  542   80 
Accrued professional fees  687   1,746 
Taxes payable  389   526 
Unclaimed property  565   565 
Directors' Fees  41   40 
Research related liabilities  388   496 
All others  1,074   1,363 
  $5,331  $6,236 

Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following as of March 31,September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

  March 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Uncertain tax positions $3,641  $3,594 
DOJ settlement (indemnified by RedPath)  -   250 
Derivative liability  51   - 
  $3,692  $3,844 

15

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Uncertain tax positions $3,733  $3,594 
DOJ settlement (indemnified by RedPath)  -   250 
Warrant liability  733   - 
Other  88   - 
  $4,554  $3,844 

 

8.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Incentive Plan

In 2015, the board of directors (the Board)“Board”) and stockholders approved the Company’s Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, or(or the Amended“Amended and Restated Plan. The Amended and Restated Plan amends the Company’s pre-existing Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, which had replaced the 1998 Stock Option Plan, or the 1998 Plan, and the 2000 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, or the 2000 Plan.Plan”). The Amended and Restated Plan authorized an additional 2,450,000245,000 shares for new awards and combinedalso included the remaining shares available under the originalprior Amended and Restated Plan. On September 14, 2017, the Company stockholders approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available for sale thereunder by 3,700,000 shares, of which 184,647 shares represented stockholders’ approval of contingent awards. Eligible participants under the Amended and Restated Plan include officers and other employees of the Company, members of the Board and outside consultants, as specified under the Amended and Restated Plan and designated by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board or the Compensation Committee.(the “Compensation Committee”).  Unless earlier terminated by action of the Board, the Amended and Restated Plan will remain in effect until such time as no stock remains available for delivery under the Amended and Restated Plan and the Company has no further rights or obligations under the Amended and Restated Plan with respect to outstanding awards thereunder.

 

 19

Historically, stock options have been granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of grant, expire 10 years from the date they are granted, and generally vested over a two-year period for members of the Board of Directors and a three-year period for employees. Upon exercise, new shares can be issued by the Company. The Company granted stock options

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in 2016, which vest monthly over a one-year period. SARs are generally granted with a grant price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of grant, vest one-third each year on the anniversary of the date of grant and expire five years from the date of grant. The restricted shares and restricted stock units (RSU’s) granted to employees historically have had a three year cliff vesting period and are subject to accelerated vesting and forfeiture under certain circumstances. Restricted shares and restricted stock units granted to board members generally have had a three year graded vesting period and are subject to accelerated vesting and forfeiture under certain circumstances.thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

In March of 2017, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and members of Thethe Board were granted incentive stock options to purchase an aggregate of 172,077 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $2.13 per share and, subject(subject generally to the executive’s or board member’s, as applicable, continued service with the Company,Company) which vest in equal monthly installments over a period of one year.

 

The following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in determining the fair value of the stock option awards granted during the threenine month period ended March 31,September 30, 2017. There were no options granted during the threenine month period ended March 31,September 30, 2016.

 

  

ThreeNine Months Ended

March 31.

September 30, 2017

 
Risk-free interest rate  1.961.85%
Expected life  4.914.93 
Expected volatility  138.71141.73%
Dividend yield  - 

 

The Company recognized approximately $0.1$0.3 million and $0.1$0.02 million of stock-based compensation expense during each of the three month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $0.5 million and $0.1 million during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In 2017, the Company inadvertently granted 184,647 share options to six employees in excess of the number available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan. These grants were cancelled and replaced with the new awards that were contingent upon stockholder approval which was received in September 2017. The replacement option grants were made on May 10, 2017, with a strike price of $2.46 and will vest in equal monthly installments over one year subject generally to the continued service of the grantees.

In September 2017, subsequent to approval by shareholders, the Company granted 945,000 stock options to members of senior management. These options have an exercise price of a $1.45 and vest in equal monthly installments over one year. Also in September 2017, the Company granted 43,000 stock options to members of the Board of Directors with an exercise price of $1.48.

 

9.INCOME TAXES

 

Generally, accounting standards require companies to provide for income taxes each quarter based on their estimate of the effective tax rate for the full year. The authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes allows use of the discrete method when it provides a better estimate of income tax expense. Due to the Company’s valuation allowance position, it is the Company’s position that the discrete method provides a more accurate estimate of income tax expense and therefore income tax expense for the current quarter has been presented using the discrete method. As the year progresses, the Company refines its estimate based on the facts and circumstances by each tax jurisdiction. The following table summarizes the income tax expense(benefit) provision on income (loss)the loss from continuing operations and the effective tax rate for the three-monththree- and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016:

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
Provision from income tax $3  $9 
Effective income tax rate  0.2%  0.2%

Income tax expense for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was primarily due to minimum state and local taxes.

 

 16

 20

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
(Benefit) provision for income tax $(42) $173  $(340) $(54)
Effective income tax rate  1.2%  2.5%  4.2%  0.4%

Income tax (benefit) provision for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was primarily due to an allocation of tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations.

 

10.SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

Upon the divestiture of its CSO business onSince December 22, 2015.2015, the Company hasreports its operations as one reporting segment:segment, molecular diagnostics. The Company realigned its reporting segments due to the integration of RedPath and acquiring certain assets from Asuragen, to reflect the Company’s current and going forward business strategy. The Company’s current reporting segment structure is reflective of the way the Company’s management views the business, makes operating decisions and assesses performance. This structure allows investors to better understand Company performance, better assess prospects for future cash flows, and make more informed decisions about the Company.

 

The Company’s molecular diagnostics business focuses on developing and commercializing molecular diagnostic tests, leveraging the latest technology and personalized medicine for better patient diagnosis and management. Through the Company’s molecular diagnostics business, the Company aims to provide physicians and patients with diagnostic options for detecting genetic and other molecular alterations that are associated with gastrointestinal, endocrine and endocrinelung cancers, which are principally focused on early detection of patients at high risk of cancer. Customers in the Company’s molecular diagnostics segment consist primarily of physicians, hospitals and clinics. The service offerings throughout the segment have similar long-term average gross margins, contract terms, types of customers and regulatory environments. They are promoted through one centrally managed marketing group and the chief operating decision maker views their results on a combined basis.

 

11.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

The table below presents the significant components of CSO, Group DCA’s, Pharmakon’sDCA's, Pharmakon's and TVG’s results included within Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss)loss for the three-monthsthree- and nine-months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016.

 

  Three Months Ending March 31, 
  2017  2016 
Revenue, net $-  $1,644 
         
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before tax  610   (735)
Income tax expense  54   45 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $556  $(780)

 17

 21

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

  Three Months Ending September 30,  Nine Months Ending September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Revenue, net $-  $-  $-  $1,644 
                 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  167   (414)  1,081   (1,006)
Gain on sale of assets  -   -   -   1,326 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before tax  167   (414)  1,081   320 
Income tax expense (benefit)  96   (117)  509   219 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $71  $(297) $572  $101 

 

The assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations relate to the CSO, Group DCA, Pharmakon, and TVG. As of March 31, 2017TVG businesses and December 31, 2016, these assets and liabilitiestheir composition are in the accompanying balance sheets as follows:

 

 For the Three Months Ended For the Year Ended  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016  CSO DCA/TVG Total CSO DCA/TVG Total 
 CSO DCA/TVG Total CSO DCA/TVG Total 
Accounts receivable. net $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Unbilled receivable. net  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Other  -   -   -   -   14   14  $-  $-  $-  $-  $14  $14 
Current assets from discontinued operations  -   -   -   -   14   14   -   -   -   -   14   14 
Property and equipment. net  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Other  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Long-term assets from discontinued operations  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Total assets $-  $-  $-  $-  $14  $14  $-  $-  $-  $-  $14  $14 
                                                
Accounts payable $868  $-  $868  $890  $-  $890  $304  $-  $304  $890  $-  $890 
Accrued salary and bonus  51   -   51   1.272   -   1.272   -   -   -   1,272   -   1,272 
Other  1,827   -   1,827   1,966   -   1,966   979   -   979   1,966   -   1,966 
Current liabilities from discontinued operations  2,746   -   2,746   4,128   -   4,128   1,283   -   1,283   4,128   -   4,128 
Total liabilities $2,746  $-  $2,746  $4,128  $-  $4,128  $1,283  $-  $1,283  $4,128  $-  $4,128 

 

12.LONG-TERM DEBT

 

On October 31, 2014, the Company and its subsidiary, Interpace LLC, entered into an agreement to acquire RedPath (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, the Company entered into an $11.0 million, interest-freea note (“RedPathpayable (the “RedPath Note”) payable inrequiring eight equal consecutive quarterly installments beginning October 1, 2016.

 

The obligations of the Company under the RedPath Note were guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries pursuant to a Guarantee and Collateral Agreement (the “Subordinated Guarantee”) in favor of the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Pursuant to the Subordinated Guarantee, the Company and its subsidiaries also granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets, including intellectual property, to secure their obligations to the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate under its Credit Agreement, the fair value of the RedPath Note at the date of issuance was $7.5 million. During the quartersthree months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company accreted zero and approximately $0.2 million in interest expense, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company accreted approximately $0.2 million and $0.2$0.6 million into interest expense, respectively, for each period.respectively. At December 31, 2016, the fair value balance of the $9.3 million RedPath Note was approximately $7.9 million and the unamortized discount was $1.4 million. As of June 30, 2017, the Note was fully converted into the Company’s common stock (see below).

 

 22

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Debt Exchange for RedPath Note

 

On MarchDecember 23, 2017, the Company entered into the Exchange Agreement with the Investor. Prior to the Company entering into the Exchange Agreement, the Investor acquired the $9.32016 we repaid $1.33 million face value RedPath Note for $8.9 million. The RedPath Equityholder Representative assigned allin principal of its rights, title and interest in the RedPath Note toresulting in an outstanding balance of $9.34 million. The balance of the RedPath Note was subsequently acquired by the Investor, including, but not limited to, its security interest in all of the assets of the Company and the assets of the Company’s subsidiaries.

Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Companyfor $8.87 million on March 22, 2017. Also on that date we and the Investor agreed to exchangeexchanged the RedPath Note for (i) a senior secured convertible note (the “Exchanged Convertible Note”) in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million and a senior secured non-convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.3 million (the “Exchanged Convertible Note”), which is convertible into shares of$3.55 million. On April 18, 2017, we and the Company’s common stock, in accordance with its terms, and (ii) aInvestor exchanged the senior secured non-convertible note with an aggregate principal amount offor $3.55 million of our senior secured convertible note (the “Exchanged Non-Convertible“Senior Secured Convertible Note”). Between March 23, 2017 and collectively,April 18, 2017, the “Exchanged Notes”),senior secured convertible notes were converted in full for a combined aggregate principal amount3,795,429 shares of $8.87 million. The Exchanged Notes ranked seniorour common stock. We no longer have any outstanding secured debt, and any security interests and liens related to all of the Company’s outstanding and future indebtedness, other than the indebtedness in favor of the Company’s credit line lender and wereour former secured by a perfected security interest in all of the existing and future assets of the Company and those of the Company’s subsidiaries. Upon the reduction of 55% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Exchanged Notes, the Investor agreed to release its security interest in its entirety. In conjunction with the extinguishment of the RedPath note, the Company recorded a fair value loss of $0.8 million.

18

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

debt have been fully released.

 

The Exchanged Notes were scheduled to mature at 125% of the face value on the fifteenth month anniversary of the closing date, or June 22, 2018, and bore interest quarterly at one and one hundredth percent (1.01%) per annum (as could be adjusted from time to time). Under the terms of the Exchanged Notes, the Company has the right to require a redemption of a portion (not less than $500,000) or all of the applicable Exchanged Notes prior to their maturity at a price equal to 115% of the principal amount of the Exchanged Notes within the first 180 days of issuance, 120% of the principal amount of the Exchanged Notes between 180 and 270 days of issuance, and 125% of the principal amount of the Exchanged Notes after 270 days of issuance. A mandatory redemption could be required by the Investor in connection with the occurrence of an event of default or change of control. In each event, the redemption price would be subject to a premium on parity, and the Exchanged Convertible Note redemption could be subject to a premium on parity if certain unfavorable conditions existed.

The Exchanged Convertible Note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock. The Investor could elect to convert all or a portion of the Exchanged Convertible Note and all accrued and unpaid interest with respect to such portion, if any, into shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $2.44. In the event the Company sought and obtained stockholder approval to issue shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of the Exchanged Convertible Note (which determination shall be at the Company’s sole discretion) from and after the date of the Exchange Agreement, the Exchanged Convertible Note could alternatively be converted (“Alternative Conversion”) by the Investor at the greater of (i) $0.40 and (ii) lowest of (x) the applicable conversion price as in effect on the applicable conversion date of the applicable Alternative Conversion, and (y) 88% of the lowest volume-weighted average price of the common stock during the 10 consecutive trading day period ending and including the date of delivery of the applicable conversion notice. If the volume-weighted average price of the common stock exceeded 135% of the Fixed Conversion Price, or $3.29, for five consecutive trading days and no equity conditions failure then exists, the Company has the option to convert the Exchanged Convertible Note into shares of common stock at the Fixed Conversion Price. The Company could not effect the conversion of any portion of the Exchanged Convertible Note, and the Investor could not have the right to convert any portion of the Exchanged Convertible Note, to the extent that after giving effect to such conversion, the Investor together with any other persons whose beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock could be aggregated with the Investor’s collectively would be in excess of 9.99% of the shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion. Additionally, any such conversion would be null and void and treated as if never made. As of March 30, 2017, the Investor had converted approximately 80% of the Exchanged Convertible Note to common stock, converting $4.22 million of the Exchanged Convertible Note into 1,730,534 shares of common stock. In connection with the conversion of the Exchanged Convertible Note, the Company recorded a loss of $0.8$4.3 million.

Upon Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”) acted as agent in connection with the conversion ofexchanges into the Exchanged Convertible Note and the Company is required to pay conversion feesSenior Secured Convertible Note. Maxim was paid a cash fee of $0.6 million representing 6.5% on all amounts converted.of the balance of the $8.85 million exchanged RedPath Note. These costs are directly related to the issuance of the Company’s shares, and as a result are recorded against equity. As of March 31, 2017, the Company incurred total conversion fees of $137,205.

 

In connection with the Exchanged Convertible Note and the Senior Secured Convertible Note, (as described below), the Company determined there to be an embedded conversion option feature. Accordingly, the embedded conversion option contained in the Exchange Convertible Note was accounted for as a derivative liability at the date of issuance, and shall be adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting date.The fair value of the embedded conversion option derivative was determined using the Black- ScholesBlack-Scholes Option Pricing Model. On the initial measurement date, the fair value of the embedded conversion option derivative of $208,427 was recorded as a derivative liability and was allocated as a debt discount to the Exchanged Convertible Note. At each conversion date, subsequent to the issuance of the Exchanged Convertible Note, the embedded conversion option derivative liability would be revalued, with any changes to its fair value being recorded to earnings. At March 31, 2017, the Company also revalued the embedded conversion option derivative liability resulting in a loss from the change in fair value.value, and accordingly. In connection with these revaluations, the Company recorded derivative losses of zero and approximately $42,000$0.1 million for the periodthree and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2017. The value of the derivative liability as of March 31,September 30, 2017 was approximately $0.05 million and is included in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

19

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.zero

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

. The Company incurred $459,195$0.5 million of debt issuance costs, for investment banking, legal and placement fee services in connection with the Exchange Agreement. These costs arewere treated as a debt discount and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the Exchanged Notes. On April 18, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment and exchange agreement (the Agreement”),In connection with the Investor. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company and the Investor agreed to exchange $3.55 million of the Company’s Exchanged Non-Convertible Note, dated March 23, 2017, for $3.55 million of the Company’s senior secured convertible note, dated April 18, 2017 (“the Senior Secured Convertible Note”). The Senior Secured Convertible Note is identical in all material respects to the Company’s Exchanged Convertible Note dated March 23, 2017, except for the initial conversion price and requiring stockholder approval to adjust the Conversion Price (as defined in the Senior Secured Convertible Note) or the right to substitute the Variable Price (as defined in the Senior Secured Convertible Note) for the Conversion Price, which provisions have been waived by the Investor with respect to the March Note. The initial conversion price of the Senior Secured Convertible Note is $2.20. The Investor has fully converted both convertible notes into 3.8 million shareson April 18, 2017, the Company recorded a loss of the Company’s common stock. The security interest has been terminated and the liens will be released upon proper termination filings. The exchange of the Exchanged Non-Convertible Note for the Senior Secured Convertible Note was made$2.3 million.

 23

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

 

Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”) acted as agent in connection with the exchange of the Exchanged Non-Convertible Note for the Senior Secured Convertible Note. Maxim was paid a cash fee of $0.6 million representing 6.5% of the balance of the $8.87 million Exchanged Notes.

13.SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The following table represents cash flows (used in) provided byused in the Company’s discontinued operations for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 Nine Months Ended 
 Three Months Ended March 31,  September 30, 
 2017  2016  2017 2016 
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations $(758) $(2.171) $(2,259) $(1,486)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities of discontinued operations $-  $- 
        
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations $-  $- 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Non Cash Financing Activities


(in thousands)

 

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
Write-off of the RedPath Note $(8,098) $- 
Issuance of the Exchange Notes $11,375  $- 
Non-cash equity conversion costs $(137) $- 
Debt issuance costs $(459) $- 
Warrants issued through Termination Agreement* $193  $- 
Conversion of shares in debt exchange $4,222  $- 

* See Note 14, Equity for more details

20

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Write-off of the RedPath Note $(8,098) $- 
Issuance of the Exchange Notes $11,375  $- 
Non-cash equity conversion costs $(173) $- 
Debt issuance costs $(511) $- 
Warrants issued through Termination Agreement (See Note 14,Equity) $193  $- 
Shares issued in debt exchange $11,643  $- 
Professional fees paid by a third party $685  $- 

 

14.EQUITY

 

InPublic Equity Offerings

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company closed on threefour separate equity offerings raising gross proceeds of $12.2$27.9 million. The details are as follows:

 

 On January 6, 2017, the Company completed a registered direct public offering, or the Second Registered Direct Offering to sell 630,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $6.81 per share to certain institutional investors, which resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4.2 million.
   
On January 25, 2017, the Company completed a registered direct public offering, or the Third Registered Direct Offering to sell 855,000 shares of its common stock and a concurrent private placement of warrants to purchase 855,000 shares of its common stock, or the Warrants, to the same investors participating in the Third Registered Direct Offering, (the Private Placement).Offering. The Warrants and the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants were not registered under the Securities Act and were sold pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares of common stock sold in the Third Registered Direct Offering and the Warrants issued in the concurrent Private Placement were issued separately but sold together at a combined purchase price of $4.69 per share of common stock and accompanying Warrant. The Third Registered Direct Offering and the Private Placement together resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4 million. The Company also used approximately $1.0 million to satisfy the obligations due to five former senior executives. See Note 6- Severance.6,Commitments and Contingencies. The fair value of these warrants issued was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and amounted to $1,668,290.$1.67 million. The warrants do not include any cash settlement provisions and accordingly are not liability classified. As a result, the Company is not required to revalue the warrants at each reporting date. The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the warrants upon issuance:

 24

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

Market Price $4.33 
Exercise Price $4.69 
Risk-free interest rate  1.95%
Expected volatility  124.02%
Expected life in years  5.0 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

 

On February 8, 2017, the Company completed an underwritten, confidentially marketed public offering, or thea CMPO to sell 1,200,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $3.00 per share. In addition, we granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 9% of the total number of shares of common stock sold by us in the CMPO, solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. The CMPO resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $3.9 million.

 

On March 23, 2017, the Company entered into the Exchange Agreement with the Investor. Prior to the Company entering into the Exchange Agreement, the Investor acquired that certain Non-Negotiable Subordinated Secured Promissory Note, dated as of October 31, 2014, as amended (the “RedPath Note”), issued by the Company and the Company’s subsidiary, Interpace, LLC, in favor of RedPath Equityholder Representative, LLC (the “RedPath Equityholder Representative”) on behalf of the former equityholders of RedPath. The RedPath Note, which was entered into in connection with the Company’s acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc., in October 2014, had an aggregate principal amount of $9.34 million outstanding and was acquired by the Investor for $8.87 million. The RedPath Equityholder Representative assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the RedPath Note to the Investor, including, but not limited to, its security interest in all of the assets of the Company and the assets of the Company’s subsidiaries.

21

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Company and the Investor agreed to exchange the RedPath Note for (i) a senior secured convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million (the “Exchanged Convertible Note”), which was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, in accordance with its terms, and (ii) a senior secured non-convertible note with an aggregate principal amount of $3.55 million (the “Exchanged Non-Convertible Note” and collectively, the “Exchanged Notes”), for a combined aggregate principal amount of $8.87 million. The Exchanged Notes ranked senior to all of the Company’s outstanding and future indebtedness, other than the indebtedness in favor of the Company’s credit line lender and were secured by a perfected security interest in all of the existing and future assets of the Company and those of the Company’s subsidiaries. Upon the reduction of 55% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Exchanged Notes, the Investor would release its security interest in its entirety.

The Exchanged Notes matured at 125% of the face value on the fifteenth month anniversary of the closing date, or June 22, 2018, and bore interest quarterly at one and one hundredth percent (1.01%) per annum (as may be adjusted from time to time). As of March 30, 2017, the Investor had converted approximately 80% of the Exchanged Convertible Note to common stock, converting $4.2 million of the Exchanged Convertible Note into 1,730,534 shares of common stock. On April 18, 2017 the Company and the Investor agreed to exchange the Exchanged Non-Convertible Note for a new convertible note in the same principal amount of $3.55 million. The Investor then converted the new convertible note into 1.61 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $2.20 per share. Accordingly, the security interest has been terminated and the liens will be released upon proper termination filings.

On, March 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, RedPath Equityholder Representative agreed to terminate all royalty and milestone rights under the contingent consideration agreement. In exchange for terminating the royalty and milestone right entered into withof RedPath, the Company agreed to issue to the RedPath Equityholder Representative 5 year warrants to acquire an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $4.69 per share. The fair value of the warrants issued was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and amounted to $193,037.$0.19 million. The warrants do not include any cash settlement provisions and accordingly are not liability classified. As a result, the Company is not required to revalue the warrants at each reporting date. The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the warrants upon issuance:

 

Market Price $2.37 
Exercise Price $4.69 
Risk-free interest rate  1.95%
Expected volatility  125.58%
Expected life in years  5.5 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

 

 25

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

As part of our acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc., we issued the RedPath Note. In December 2016 we repaid $1.33 million in principal of the RedPath Note resulting in an outstanding balance of $9.34 million. The RedPath Note was subsequently acquired by the Investor for $8.87 million on March 22, 2017. Also on that date we and the investor exchanged the RedPath Note for a senior secured convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million and a senior secured non-convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $3.55 million. On April 18, 2017, we and the Investor exchanged the senior secured non-convertible note for $3.55 million of our senior secured convertible note. Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the senior secured convertible notes were converted in full for 3,795,429 shares of our common stock. We no longer have any outstanding secured debt, and any security interests and liens related to our former secured debt have been or will be released and/or terminated upon the completion of applicable filings.

On June 16, 2017, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Maxim as the representative of several underwriters (the “Underwriters”) named therein with respect to the issuance and sale of an aggregate of (i) 9,900,000 shares (“Firm Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, (ii) Base Warrants to purchase 12,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to $1.25 per share, and (iii) Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $0.01 per share in the Offering pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement. Each Firm Share and accompanying Base Warrant was sold for a combined effective price of $1.10, and each Pre-Funded Warrant and accompanying Base Warrant was sold for a combined effective price of $1.09. The Underwriters were entitled to receive an underwriting discount equal to 7.5% of the offer price of the aggregate number of Firm Shares and Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the Offering and Over-Allotment and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of $0.1 million. The Company also granted the Underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 Firm Shares and/or 1,875,000 Base Warrants to cover over-allotments, if any (the “Over-Allotment”). Additionally, the Company agreed to issue to the Underwriters warrants (the “Underwriter Warrant”) to purchase a number of Firm Shares of common stock equal to an aggregate of 4% of the total number of shares of Common Stock and Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the Offering.

The Company offered to each purchaser whose purchase of shares of common stock in this Offering would otherwise result in the purchaser, together with its affiliates and certain related parties, beneficially owning more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock immediately following the consummation of this Offering, the opportunity to purchase, if the purchaser so chooses, pre-funded warrants, in lieu of shares of common stock that would otherwise result in the purchaser’s beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% of our outstanding common stock. Subject to limited exceptions, a holder of pre-funded warrants could not have the right to exercise any portion of its pre-funded warrants if the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% (or, at the election of the holder, 9.99%) of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise. Each pre-funded warrant was exercisable for one share of our common stock. The Offering also related to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of any pre-funded warrants sold in the Offering. Each pre-funded warrant was sold together with a common warrant with the same terms as the common warrant described above. The common warrants were exercisable immediately and will expire five years after the date of issuance, or June 22, 2022. The shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants could only be purchased with the accompanying common warrants, but were issued separately, and were immediately separable upon issuance.

 26

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

On June 21, 2017, the Company successfully closed its Offering, See Note 2,Liquidity. A public trading market for the Base Warrants was established on July 5, 2017 on the OTC market under the trading symbol IDGGW. As part of the offering the Underwriters purchased the full over-allotment of 1,875,000 Base Warrants available to them for the specified $.01 per warrant, which are not exercisable for six months after the Offering. The full 2,600,000 of Pre-Funded Warrants were also sold on at the price of $1.09 per warrant. The combined gross proceeds of the Offering totaled $13.7 million with approximately $12.3 million of net funds available to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and other stock issuance expenses.

In summary, the Company issued 9,900,000 shares of Common Stock as well as Base Warrants, Overallotment Warrants, Pre-Funded Warrants and Underwriters Warrants to purchase 12,500,000, 1,875,000, 2,600,000 and 575,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, respectively. The Pre-Funded and Underwriters Warrants are classified as liabilities because in certain circumstances they could require cash settlement. The Base and Overallotment Warrants do not contain such provisions. As a result, the Company is not required to revalue the Base and Overallotment warrants at each reporting date. The Base Warrants are traded on the OTC market, however, trading volume has been insufficient to determine fair value. The fair value of the Base and Overallotment Warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and amounted to $5.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the Base Warrants and Overallotment Warrants upon issuance:

Market Price $0.87 
Exercise Price $1.25 
Risk-free interest rate  1.75%
Expected volatility  134.21%
Expected life in years  5.0 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

As of July 7, 2017, all of the 2,600,000 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised for $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued. On July 31, the Underwriters exercised their right to purchase 875,000 Firm Shares for $0.960 million net of $0.072 million in underwriter discounts, or $0.882 million.

On July 5, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement for investor relations services. In consideration for these services, the Company paid $0.2 million in cash and agreed to issue a warrant expiring in August 2020, exercisable into 150,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.25.

 27

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

The warrant issuance is considered a share-based payment award issued to a nonemployee in exchange for services and falls within the scope of ASC 505-50. The fair value of the warrant was determined to be $0.2 million and was fully expensed during the quarter ended September 30, 2017.

The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the share- based warrant upon issuance:

Market Price $1.62 
Exercise Price $1.25 
Risk-free interest rate  1.66%
Expected volatility  172.29%
Expected life in years  3.1 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

15.WARRANTS

Warrants outstanding and warrant activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 are as follows:

Description Classification Exercise Price  Expiration Date 

Balance

December 31, 2016

  Warrants Issued  Warrants Exercised  Warrants Cancelled/ Expired  

Balance

September 30, 2017

 
                       
Pre-Funded Warrants, issued June 21, 2017 Liability $0.01  None  -   2,600,000   (2,600,000)  -   - 
Underwriters Warrants, issued June 21, 2017 Liability $1.32  December 2022  -   575,000   -   (40,000)  535,000 
Private Placement Warrants, issued January 25, 2017 Equity $4.69  June 2022  -   855,000   -   -   855,000 
RedPath Warrants, issued March 22, 2017 Equity $4.69  September 2022  -   100,000   -   -   100,000 
Base & Overallotment Warrants, issued June 21, 2017 Equity $1.25  June 2022  -   14,375,000   (747,800)  -   13,627,200 
Vendor Warrants, issued August 6, 2017 Equity $1.25  August 2020 -   150,000   -   -   150,000 
                             
          -   18,655,000   (3,347,800)  (40,000)  15,267,200 

16.RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In March 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (”FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify the accounting and reporting for employee share-based payment transactions. The pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of the guidance in ASU No. 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

 22

 28

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(continued)


(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which when effective will require organizations that lease assets (e.g., through “leases”) to recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by the leases on the balance sheet. A lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with terms that exceed twelve months. The standard will also require disclosures to help investors and financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contract with Customers - Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contract with Customers - Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 deferring the effective date to annual and interim periods. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”Customers (Topic 606). The core principlestandard, including subsequently issued amendments, will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The key focus of these ASUs arethe new standard is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendmentsTo achieve this key focus, there is a five-step approach outlined in ASU 2016-12 affect only the narrow aspectsstandard. Entities are permitted to apply the new standard under the full retrospective method, subject to certain practical expedients, or the modified retrospective method that requires the application of the guidance such as assessing the collectability criterion and accounting foronly to contracts that do not meetare uncompleted on the criterion, presentation of sales and other similar taxes collected from customers, non-cash consideration, and contract modifications at transition. ASU 2016-10 clarifies two aspects of the guidance: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation. The intention of ASU 2016-08 is to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. ASU 2015-14 defers the effective date to annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, and early adoption will be permitted, but not earlier than the original effective date of annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016, for public entities. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensiveinitial application. The Company will adopt the new revenue recognition model for revenue from contract with customers. standard and subsequently issued amendments as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.

The Company is evaluatinghas formed an implementation team, which includes internal accounting resources and a third party consulting firm, to oversee the potential impactadoption of the new guidancestandard. The implementation team is performing a detailed review of the Company’s contracts and will adopt these ASUs when effective.revenue streams to identify potential differences in accounting as a result of the new standard. The Company continues to assess the impact on its existing revenue accounting policies, newly required financial statement disclosures, and is executing on the project plan. The Company has not yet determined the impact from the adoption of the new standard on either its financial position or results of operations.

 

16.17.OTHER SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Brookwood MC Investors, LLC & MCII v, PDI, Inc.Warrant Exercise Agreement

On March 30, 2017, the Company received a tenancy summons and verified complaint for nonpayment of its Parsippany, New Jersey office rent. The complaint alleged amounts owing of $203,734 covering unpaid base rent of $54,075 from January through March 2017, as well as late charges, attorney’s fees, and the redeposit of a security deposit of $136,975. The plaintiff landlord sought judgement for possession of the premises. A hearing in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County-Special Civil part, took place on April 21, 2017. The Company subsequently entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff landlord on May 9, 2017 whereas the landlord applied the security deposit against the unpaid rent and the Company agreed to a payment plan of $25,000 per month beginning in April 2017 and through September 2017 when the balance of amounts are payable in full, for the remainder of its lease which expires June 30, 2017. The first payment was made on April 28, 2017.

Nasdaq Correspondence

On April 10, 2017, the Company received written notice from the Listing Qualifications department (the “Staff”) of The NASDAQ Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) notifying the Company that based on its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, evidencing stockholder’s equity of $6.5 million, the Staff has determined that the Company complies with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) and that the matter, previously disclosed by the Company, has been closed.

Debt Exchange

 

On April 18,October 12, 2017, the Company entered into warrant exercise agreements (each a “Warrant Exercise Agreement”) with certain holders (collectively, the “Warrant Holders” and each, a “Warrant Holder”) of the Company’s warrants (the “Warrants”) issued in June 2017. Pursuant to the Warrant Exercise Agreement, the Warrant Holders agreed to exercise Warrants for an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of common stock, at the Warrant exercise price of $1.25 per share. The Warrants were issued pursuant to that certain warrant agency agreement, dated as of June 21, 2017 (the “Warrant Agency Agreement”), by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent (the “Warrant Agent”). In connection with the Investor exchanging a non-convertible note for a new convertible noteexercises, the Company agreed to issue additional warrants to the Warrant Holders for the same amount. See Note 12, Long-Term Debt for details.number of shares of Common Stock that is equal to eighty percent (or 3,200,000 warrants) of the number of shares exercised by such Warrant Holder (the “Additional Warrant Shares”), at an exercise price of $1.80 per share.

 

 23

 29

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q)(“Form 10-Q”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act)“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. as amended (the Exchange Act)“Exchange Act”). Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our plans, objectives, beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “intends,” “projects,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will” or similar words and expressions. These forward-looking statements are contained throughout this Form 10-Q.

 

Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions involving judgments about, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. These predictions are also affected by known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the followingfollowing:

 

 our limited operating history as a molecular diagnostics company;ability to profitably grow our business, including our ability to finance our business on acceptable terms and successfully compete in the market;
 our ability to obtain broad adoption of and reimbursement for our molecular diagnostic tests in a changing reimbursement environment;
 
whether we are able to successfully utilize our operating experience to sell our molecular diagnostic tests;
 
our limited operating history as a molecular diagnostics company;
● our dependence on a concentrated selection of payorspayers for our molecular diagnostic tests;
 the demand for our molecular diagnostic tests from physicians and patients;
 
our reliance on our internal sales forces for business expansion;
 
our dependence on third parties for the supply of some of the materials used in our molecular diagnostic tests;
 
our ability to scale our operations, testing capacity and processing technology;
 our ability to meet the remaining legacy obligations of our Commercial Services, or CSO, business previously sold;
 our ability to continue to continue to secure sufficient levels of reimbursement to continue to progress our business;
 our ability to compete successfully with companies with greater financial resources;
 
our ability to obtain sufficient data and samples to cost effectively and timely perform sufficient clinical trials in order to support our current and future products;

 30

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 product liability claims against us;
patent infringement claims against us;
 our involvement in current and future litigation against us;
 
the effect current and future laws, licensing requirements and regulation have on our business including the changing U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, environment as it relates to molecular diagnostics;
 
the effect of potential adverse findings resulting from regulatory audits of our billing practices and the impact such results could have on our business;
 
our exposure to environmental liabilities as a result of our business;
 the susceptibility of our information systems to security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions;
 
our ability to enter into effective electronic data interchange arrangements with our customers;
 
our billing practices and our ability to collect on claims for the sale of our molecular diagnostic tests;
 
our ability to attract and retain qualified sales representatives and other key employees and management personnel;
 
competition in the segment of the molecular diagnostics industry in which we operate or expect to operate;
 
our ability to obtain additional funds in order to implement our business models and strategies;
 
the results of any future impairment testing for other intangible assets;
 
our ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate any future acquisitions and the effects of any such items on our revenues, profitability and ongoing business;
 
our compliance with our license agreements and our ability to protect and defend our intellectual property rights;
 
our ability to maintain our listing with The Nasdaq Capital Market, despite our having received a notice of non-compliance for failing to have three independent audit committee members;Market;
 the effect of material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls;
● the effect of adverse weather conditions such as hurricanes on our business;
 failure of third-party service providers to perform their obligations to us; and
 
● the volatility of our stock price and fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenues and earnings.

 

24

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Please see Part I – Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as amended, as well as other documents we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)SEC from time-to-time, for other important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our current expectations as expressed in the forward-looking statements discussed in this Form 10-Q. Because of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In addition, these statements speak only as of the date of the report in which they are set forth and, except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

 

 31

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

OVERVIEW

 

We are a fully integrated commercial company that provides clinically useful molecular diagnostic tests and pathology services. We develop and commercialize molecular diagnostic tests and related first line assays principally focused on early detection of patients at high risk of cancer and leverage the latest technology and personalized medicine for improved patient diagnosis and management. We currently have three commercialized molecular diagnostic assays in the marketplace for which we are reimbursed by Medicare and multiple private payors:payers: PancraGEN®, a pancreatic cyst and pancreaticobiliary solid lesion molecular test that can aid in pancreatic cyst diagnosis and pancreatic cancer risk assessment utilizing our proprietary PathFinder platform; ThyGenX®, which assesses thyroid nodules for risk of malignancy; and ThyraMIR®, which assesses thyroid nodules for risk of malignancy utilizing a proprietary gene expression assay. We are also in the process of “soft launching” while we gather additional market data, BarreGEN®, an esophageal cancer risk classifier for Barrett’s Esophagus that utilizes our PathFinder platform.platform and RespriDX™ for assessing metastatic versus primary lung cancer which was launched in September 2017. RespriDX™ differentiates the local recurrence of cancer versus new primary cancer formation. It compares the mutational fingerprint of two or more sites of lung cancer to determine whether the neoplastic deposits are representative of a recurrence of cancer or a new primary (independent) cancer.

 

Our mission is to provide personalized medicine through molecular diagnostics and innovation to advance patient care based on rigorous science. We are leveraging our Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments or CLIA, certified(“CLIA”) and College of American Pathologists or CAP,(“CAP”), accredited laboratories to develop and commercialize our assays and products. We aim to provide physicians and patients with diagnostic options for detecting genetic and other molecular mutations that are associated with gastrointestinal and endocrine cancer. Our customers consist primarily of physicians, hospitals and clinics.

 

The global molecular diagnostics market is estimated to be $6.45 billion and is a segment within the approximately $60 billion in vitro diagnostics market. We believe that the molecular diagnostics market offers significant growth and strong patient value given the substantial opportunity it affords to lower healthcare costs by helping to reduce unnecessary surgeries and ensuring the appropriate frequency of monitoring. We are keenly focused on growing our test volumes, securing additional coverage and reimbursement, maintaining our current reimbursement and supporting revenue growth for our three commercialized innovative tests, introducing related first line product and service extensions, as well as expanding our business by developing and promoting synergistic products, like BarreGEN®, and RespriDX® in our market.

 

Additional Reimbursement Coverage During 2017

 

Reimbursement progress is key for any molecular diagnostic company. We made progress in obtaining both public and private reimbursement throughout 2016. We were successful in expanding the reimbursement of our products in 2016 and that has continued into 2017. Specifically the most significant progress we have made the following progress with payorsregarding payers so far in 2017:2017 is as follows:

 32

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

 In April 2017, we announced that UnitedHealthcare, the largest health plan in the United States, has agreed to cover our ThyraMIR® test used in assessing indeterminate thyroid nodule fine needle aspirate (FNA)(“FNA”) biopsies. The coverage is now in effect and is subject to members’ specific benefit plan design. OurThyGenX®
In June 2017, we announced that we signed a new national contract with Aetna for our ThyGenX ® and ThyraMIR assays areThyraMIR® molecular tests for indeterminate thyroid nodules. The agreement covers many of Aetna’s products, including commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. The agreement is our first national provider contract with a national health plan and means that we will now be part of Aetna’s laboratory network for these services. The agreement went into effect August 15, 2017.
● In July 2017, we announced that Cigna, one of the largest national health plans in the United States, has agreed to cover Interpace’s ThyGenX® test for Cigna’s 15 million members nationwide, with coverage effective immediately. Cigna’s coverage when combined with Aetna, UnitedHealthcare, Medicare and other payers brings the total number of covered lives for ThyGenX® to approximately 250275 million patients nationwide, including through Medicare, National, and Regional health plans.nationwide.

 25 
● In October 2017, we announced that Medicare reimbursement for our ThyGenX® molecular test for indeterminate thyroid nodules will increase by 40% starting January 1, 2018. Medicare represents approximately 40% of the Company’s volume for the ThyGenX test.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Recent Equity Financings

 

From January 6, 2017 through February 8,September 30, 2017, we completed threefour public offerings of common stock and a private placement of warrants, which resulted in aggregate gross proceeds to us of approximately $12.2$27.9 million. A description of the financings is as follows:

 

On January 6, 2017, we completed a registered direct public offering, or the Second Registered Direct Offering, to sell 630,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $6.81 per share to certain institutional investors. The Second Registered Direct Offering resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $4.2 million. We are using the net proceeds from the Second Registered Direct Offering for working capital, repayment of indebtedness and general corporate purposes. In addition, we granted each institutional investor who participated in the Second Registered Direct Offering the right, for a period of 15 months following January 6, 2017, or until April 6, 2018, to participate in any public or private offering by us of equity securities, subject to certain exceptions, up to such investor’s pro rata portion of 50% of the securities being offered.
  
On January 25, 2017, we completed a registered direct public offering, or the Third Registered Direct Offering, to sell 855,000 shares of our common stock and a concurrent private placement of warrants to purchase 855,000 shares of our common stock, or the Warrants, to the same investors participating in the Third Registered Direct Offering, (the Private Placement)“Private Placement”). The Warrants and the shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants were not registered under the Securities Act and were sold pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares of common stock sold in the Third Registered Direct Offering and the Warrants issued in the concurrent Private Placement were issued separately but sold together at a combined purchase price of $4.69 per share of common stock and accompanying Warrant. The Third Registered Direct Offering and the Private Placement together resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $4 million. We are using the net proceeds from the Third Registered Direct Offering for working capital, repayment of indebtedness and general corporate purposes and also used approximately $1.0 million to satisfy the severance obligations due to the five former senior executives.
  
On February 8, 2017, we completed an underwritten, confidentially marketed public offering, or the CMPO, to sell 1,200,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $3.00 per share. In addition, we granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 9% of the total number of shares of common stock sold by us in the CMPO, solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. The CMPO resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $3.9 million. We are using the proceeds from the CMPO for working capital, repayment of indebtedness and liabilities and for general corporate purposes.

 

 33

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

On June 21, 2017, pursuant to its S-1 filing of its preliminary prospectus to register shares on May 22, 2017, as amended thereafter, the Company completed a public offering for 9,900,000 shares of common stock together with an equal number of common warrants (the “Base Warrants”), to purchase shares of its common stock (and the shares of common stock that are issuable from time to time upon exercise of the common warrants) for $1.10 per share. Each Base Warrant upon exercise at a price of $1.25 will result in the issuance of one share of common stock to the holder. A public trading market for the Base Warrants was established on July 5, 2017 on the OTC market under the trading symbol IDGGW. As part of the offering (the “Offering”), which closed on June 21, 2017, the related underwriters purchased the full over-allotment of 1,875,000 Base Warrants available to them for the specified $.01 per warrant. 2,600,000 of Pre-Funded Warrants were also sold at the specified $1.09 per warrant. The combined gross proceeds of the Offering totaled $13.7 million with approximately $12.3 million of net funds available to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and other stock issuance expenses. As of July 7, 2017 all of the 2,600,000 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised for the $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued. On July 31, the Company and the underwriters closed on the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase an additional 875,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.09 per share for gross proceeds of $0.960 million.

As of July 7, 2017 all of the 2,600,000 Pre-funded Warrants were exercised for the $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued.

During September 2017 the Company received approximately $0.9 million from the exercise of 747,800 Base Warrants.
Additionally, On October 12, 2017, the Company”), entered into warrant exercise agreements (each a “Warrant Exercise Agreement”) with certain holders (collectively, the “Warrant Holders” and each, a “Warrant Holder”) of the Company’s warrants (the “Warrants”) issued in June 2017. The Warrants were issued pursuant to that certain warrant agency agreement, dated as of June 21, 2017 (the “Warrant Agency Agreement”), by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent (the “Warrant Agent”). Pursuant to the Warrant Exercise Agreement, the Warrant Holders agreed to exercise Warrants for an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share in exchange for additional warrants to the Warrant Holders for the number of shares of Common Stock that is equal to eighty percent of the number of shares exercised by such Warrant Holder (the “Additional Warrant Shares”), at an exercise price of $1.80 per share. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $5,000,000 from the exercise of the Warrants, which will be used for general working capital purposes. The Warrants and Exercised Shares were registered pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-218140).

Recent Notices of NASDAQ Listing Compliance

On July 31, 2017, NASDAQ notified the Company that its common stock failed to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 over the previous 30 consecutive business days as required by the Listing Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. On August 30, 2017 NASDAQ determined that the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock had been at $1.00 per share or greater for the 10 consecutive business days from August 15 to 28, 2017. Accordingly, NASDAQ has notified the Company that it had regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) and this matter is now closed.

 34

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

On October 6, 2016, NASDAQ notified the Company that it did not comply with the audit committee requirements for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market set forth in Listing Rule 5605(c)(2) (the “Rule”). The Company was granted time to regain compliance until no later than its next annual meeting, which occurred on September 14, 2017. Based on the information regarding the appointment of Dr. Felice Schnoll-Sussman to the Company’s Board of Directors and audit committee, as detailed in our Form 8-K dated September 13, 2017, NASDAQ has notified the Company that it now complies with the Rule and this matter is now closed.

DESCRIPTION OF REPORTING SEGMENTS

 

We currently operate under one operating segment, which is our molecular diagnostic business. Until December 22, 2015 prior to the sale of the CSO business, we operated under two reporting segments: Commercial Services and Interpace Diagnostics. The CSO business is reported as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

 

26

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Interpace Diagnostics

 

WeUnder current GAAP, we recognize revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services have been rendered; the selling price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.

 

Our revenue is generated using our proprietary tests and related services. Our performance obligation is fulfilled upon the completion, review and release of test results. In conjunction with fulfilling these services, we bill the third-party payorpayer or hospital. We recognize our revenue related to billings for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and hospitals on an accrual basis, net of contractual adjustment, when a contract is in place, a reliable pattern of collectability exists and collectability is reasonably assured. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between the list prices and the reimbursement rate set by Medicare and Medicare Advantage, the contractual rate or the amounts agreed to with hospitals.

 

Until a contract has been negotiated with a commercial insurance carrier or governmental program, the services may or may not be covered by these entities existing reimbursement policies. In the absence of an agreement with the patient or other clearly enforceable legal right to demand payment, the related revenue is only recognized upon the earlier of payment notification or cash receipt. Accordingly, we recognize revenue from commercial insurance carriers, government programs, and direct-bill healthcare providers without contracts, when payment is received.

 

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and delivery is deemed to have occurred upon completion, review, and release of the test results at which time we will bill the third-party payorpayer or hospital. The assessment of the fixed or determinable nature of the fees charged for diagnostic testing performed, and the collectability of those fees, requires significant judgment by our management. Our management believes that these two criteria have been met when there is contracted reimbursement coverage or a predictable pattern of collectability with individual third-party payorspayers or hospitals and accordingly, recognizes revenue upon delivery of the test results. In the absence of contracted reimbursement coverage or a predictable pattern of collectability, we believe that the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured only upon request of third-party payorpayer notification of payment or when cash is received, and we recognize revenue at that time.

 

 35

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Cost of services consists primarily of the costs associated with operating our laboratories and other costs directly related to our tests. Personnel costs, which constitute the largest portion of cost of services, include all labor related costs, such as salaries, bonuses, fringe benefits and payroll taxes for laboratory personnel. Other direct costs include, but are not limited to, laboratory supplies, certain consulting expenses, and facility expenses.

 

27

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations data. The trends illustrated in this table may not be indicative of future results.

 

Condensed Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations for the Quarter Ended March 31,September 30, 2017 Compared to the Quarter Ended March 31,September 30, 2016 (in thousands)

 

 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended
 March 31,  September 30,
 2017 2017 2016 2016 
�� 2017 2017 2016 2016 
                  
Revenue, net $3,470   100.0% $3,035   100.0% $4,202   100.0% $3,316   100.0%
Cost of revenue  1,771   51.0%  1,179   38.8%  2,069   49.2%  1,846   55.7%
Gross profit  1,699   49.0%  1,856   61.2%  2,133   50.8%  1,470   44.3%
Operating expenses:                                
Sales and marketing  1,136   32.7%  1,547   51.0%  1,816   43.2%  1,282   38.7%
Research and development  306   8.8%  323   10.6%  483   11.5%  659   19.9%
General and administrative  1,522   43.9%  2,816   92.8%  2,116   50.4%  2,858   86.2%
Acquisition related amortization expense  813   23.4%  970   32.0%  813   19.3%  970   29.3%
Asset impairment  -   0.0%  3,363   101.4%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  -166.5%  -   -   -   0.0%  (1,174)    
Total operating expenses  (1,999)  -57.6%  5,656   186.4%  5,228   124.4%  8,803   265.5%
                                
Operating income (loss)  3,698   106.6%  (3,800)  -125.2%
Operating loss  (3,095)  -73.7%  (6,488)  -195.7%
Interest expense  (254)  -7.3%  (203)  -6.7%  (40)  -1.0%  (539)  -16.3%
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (1,547)  -44.6%  -   - 
Other income (expense), net  (36)  -1.0%  6   0.2%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before tax  1,861   53.6%  (3,997)  -131.7%
Provision for income tax  3   0.1%  9   0.3%
Income (loss) from continuing operations  1,858   53.5%  (4,006)  -132.0%
Other income (loss), net  (294)  -7.0%  4   0.1%
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (3,429)  -81.6%  (7,023)  -211.8%
Benefit for income tax  (42)  -1.0%  173   5.2%
Loss from continuing operations  (3,387)  -80.6%  (7,196)  -217.0%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  556   16.0%  (780)  -25.7%  71   1.7%  (297)  -9.0%
Net income (loss) $2,414   69.6% $(4,786)  -157.7%
Net loss $(3,316)  -78.9% $(7,493)  -226.0%

Revenue, net

 

ConsolidatedNet revenue for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 increased by $0.5$0.9 million, or 14.3%26.7%, to $3.5$4.2 million, compared to $3.0$3.3 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016. This increase was principally attributable to increased test and collection volume for our thyroid tests.tests and the change from cash basis to accrual for ThyraMIR.

 36

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Cost of revenue

 

Consolidated costCost of revenue for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 increased by $0.6$0.2 million, or 50.2%12.1%. This increase was primarily driven by andue to the increase in lab supplies expense for the period of $0.3 million and an increase in royalty expense of $0.1 million.revenue discussed above. As a percentage of revenue cost of revenue increaseddecreased to 51.0%49.2% as compared to 38.8%55.7% in the comparable prior year period.period as the Company became more efficient in its manufacturing process and average reimbursement increased.

 

Gross profit

Consolidated gross profit for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 decreased $0.2increased $0.7 million, or 8.5%45.1%, to $1.7$2.1 million, compared to $1.9gross profit of $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016. This decreaseincrease was primarily related to the increase in lab supplies expenserevenue and royalty expenseimproved efficiencies in manufacturing processes as discussed above.

 

Sales and marketing expense

 

Sales and marketing expense was $1.1$1.8 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and as a percentage of revenue was 32.7%43.2%. For the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the sales and marketing expense was $1.5$1.3 million and 51.0%or 38.7% as a percentage of revenue. The decreaseincrease in sales and marketing expense principally reflects a reduction in sales personnel and the consolidationmodest rebuilding of marketing activities and the percentage of revenue decline is also a function of the growthcertain other costs that had been minimized in revenues.

28

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.2016 during cost reduction initiatives.

 

Research and development

 

Research and development expense reflects clinical and research costs for supplies, laboratory tests and evaluations, scientific and administrative staff involved in clinical research, statistical research and product development related to new tests, products and programs. These costs totaled $0.3were approximately $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and asSeptember 30, 2016, respectively. As a percentage of revenue they were 8.8%. For11.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2016September 30, 2017 and 19.9 % for the expense was $0.3 million and as a percentage of revenue was 10.6%. The decrease as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to increased revenues.three months ended September 30, 2016.

 

General and administrative

 

General and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 was $1.5$2.1 million as compared to $2.8$2.9 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily attributable to reversala decrease in bad debt expense of severance accrualsapproximately $0.3 million and a non-recurring charge of $1.5approximately $0.3 million partially offset by an increaserecorded in professional services expenses.the three months ended September 30, 2016.

 

Acquisition related amortization expense

 

During the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and March 31,September 30, 2016, we recorded amortization expense of approximately $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively. This relates to the amortization for RedPath and Asuragen acquired intangible assets. The decrease relates to the impact of certain intangibles being fully written off in 2016, as2016. See Asset impairment, below. As a result the amortization expense is reduced going forward.

 37

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Asset impairment

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred an asset impairment charge of approximately $3.4 million for the write-off of a pancreas test and biobank-specimen assets associated with the acquisition of certain assets from Asuragen that were determined to have no future value .

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

During the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, there was a $1.2 million reduction in contingent consideration liability related to amounts associated with future royalty payments for the pancreas asset acquired from Asuragen.

Operating loss

There was an operating loss of $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and an operating loss during the three months ended September 30, 2016 of $6.5 million. The decrease in the operating loss for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to the asset impairment charge of $3.4 million recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2016, as well as the increase in revenue and gross profit discussed above.

Benefit for income taxes

We had an income tax benefit of approximately $0.04 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. We had income tax expense of approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. Both the income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and the income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to allocation of tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

We had income from discontinued operations of $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and a loss from discontinued operations of $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The income from discontinued operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 was primarily related to the favorable settlement of outstanding obligations. The loss from discontinued operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was primarily related to legacy costs associated with the CSO business.

Condensed Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands)

 38

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2017  2016  2016 
             
Revenue, net $11,527   100.0% $9,963   100.0%
Cost of revenue  5,719   49.6%  4,866   48.8%
Gross profit  5,808   50.4%  5,097   51.2%
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing  4,507   39.1%  4,186   42.0%
Research and development  1,202   10.4%  1,339   13.4%
General and administrative  6,431   55.8%  7,655   76.8%
Acquisition related amortization expense  2,439   21.2%  2,909   29.2%
Asset impairment  -   0.0%  3,363   33.8%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  -50.1%  (1,174)  -11.8%
Total operating expenses  8,803   76.4%  18,278   183.5%
                 
Operating loss  (2,995)  -26.0%  (13,181)  -132.3%
Interest expense  (433)  -3.8%  (1,601)  -16.1%
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (4,278)  -37.1%  -   0.0%
Other (loss) income, net  (414)  -3.6%  14   0.1%
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (8,120)  -70.4%  (14,768)  -148.2%
Benefit for income tax  (340)  -2.9%  (54)  -0.5%
Loss from continuing operations  (7,780)  -67.5%  (14,714)  -147.7%
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax  572   5.0%  101   1.0%
Net loss $(7,208)  -62.5% $(14,613)  -146.7%

Revenue, net

Net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $1.5 million, or 15.7%, to $11.5 million, compared to net revenue of $10.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was principally attributable to increased test and collection volume for our thyroid tests and the change from cash basis to accrual for ThyraMIR.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $0.9 million or 17.5% as compared to the same period in 2016. The primary reason for the change was the increase in revenue and the corresponding increase in expenses. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue increased to 49.6% as compared to 48.8% in the comparable prior year period.

Gross profit

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased slightly to 50.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 51.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to an increase in lab supplies expense.

 39

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Sales and marketing expense

Sales and marketing expense was $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and as a percentage of net revenue was 39.1%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, sales and marketing expense was $4.2 million or 42.0% as a percentage of net revenue. The increase in sales and marketing expense principally reflects an increase in employee costs and the decline as a percentage of net revenue is a function of the growth in revenues.

Research and development

Research and development costs totaled $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and as a percentage of net revenue they were 10.4%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 the expense was $1.3 million and as a percentage of net revenue was 13.4%. The decrease as a percentage of net revenue was primarily due to increased revenues.

General and administrative

General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $6.4 million as compared to $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in severance expense of $2.0 million due to the settlement of severance obligations with former executives in the first quarter of 2017. This decrease was partially offset by the expense associated with our DOJ settlement of $0.9 million, $0.5 million pertains to 2016 and $0.4 million pertains to a potential 2017 liability.

Acquisition related amortization expense

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, we recorded amortization expense of approximately $2.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively related to the amortization for RedPath and Asuragen acquired intangible assets. The decrease relates to the impact of certain intangibles being fully written off in 2016. See Asset impairment, below. As a result the amortization expense is reduced going forward.

Asset impairment

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred an asset impairment charge of approximately $3.4 million for the write-off of a pancreas test and biobank-specimen assets associated with the acquisition of certain assets from Asuragen that were determined to have no future value .

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, there was a $5.8 million reduction in contingent consideration liability related to amounts associated with future royalty payments for the assets acquired from Redpath. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, there was a $1.2 million reduction in contingent consideration liability related to amounts associated with future royalty payments for the pancreas asset acquired from Asuragen.

 

Operating income (loss)loss

 

There was an operating incomeloss from continuing operations of $3.7$3.0 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and an operating loss during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 of $3.8$13.2 million. The increase in operating income for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to the reversal of our Redpath contingent consideration liability of $5.8 million. Withoutmillion in the reversal of contingent consideration the operating income from continuing operations for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 would have been an operating lossand the asset impairment charge of $2.1$3.3 million comparable toin the $3.8 million operating loss innine months ended September 30, 2016.

 

 40

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

ProvisionBenefit for income taxes

 

We had an income tax expensebenefit of approximately $3,000$0.3 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017. We had an income tax expensebenefit of approximately $9,000$0.1 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016. IncomeThe income tax expensebenefit for both periods was primarily due to minimum stateallocation of tax expense between continuing and local taxes.discontinued operations.

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

We had income from discontinued operations of $0.6 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 and a lossincome from discontinued operations of $0.8$0.1 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016. The income from discontinued operations for the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 was primarily related to a reversalreversals of severance expense of $0.5 million. The loss from discontinued operationsaccruals and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 it was primarily related to the accrualgain on sale of severance expense.

29

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.$1.3 million related to the final working capital adjustment regarding the sale of the CSO business in December of 2015 partially offset by expenses relating to the winding down of CSO.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

For the quarternine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017, we had an operating incomeloss of $3.7$3.0 million. As of March 31,September 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.1$11.7 million and current liabilities of $13.0$8.3 million.

 

It is anticipated that we may require additional capital to fund our operations in the future. There is no guarantee that additional capital can be raised to fund our operations in 2017 and beyond.future operations. We intend to meet our capital needs by driving revenue growth, containing costs as well as exploring other options.

 

We completed four public offerings and a private placement of warrants from December 22, 2016January 6, 2017 through February 8,September 2017, which resulted in aggregate gross proceeds to us of approximately $14.1$27.9 million. See “Recent Equity Financings”. Of that amount, we used approximately $1.3 million to make the first principal payment on the RedPath Note on December 31, 2016 (which RedPath Note has since been acquired by the Investor and exchanged with the Company for the Exchanged Notes) and approximately $1.0 million on February 27, 2017 to satisfy severance obligations due to five former senior executives. The proceeds from the public offerings and private placement have improved our overall cash position.

 

Additionally, on March 23, 2017, we completedSee Note 2, Liquidityin the exchangeunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the RedPath Note, which was acquired by the Investor, for two new Exchanged Notes aggregating $8.9 million. The Exchanged Notes consisted of (i) a senior secured convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.3 million which was convertible into shares of our common stock, in accordance with its terms, and (ii) a senior secured non-convertible note with an aggregate principal amount of $3.6 million. The Exchanged Notes ranked senior to all of our outstanding and future indebtedness, other than the indebtedness in favor of our credit line lender and were secured by a perfected security interest in all of our existing and future assets and those of our subsidiaries. Upon the reduction of 55% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Exchanged Notes, the Investor agreed to release its security interest in its entirety. On April 18, 2017, the institutional investor exchanged the $3.6 million secured note for a $3.6 million secured convertible note issued by the Company. On April 18, 2017, the investor fully converted the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock. The security interest has been terminated and the liens will be released upon proper termination filings.Note.

 

On September 28, 2016, the Company and its wholly owned direct and indirect subsidiaries, Interpace LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Corporation, entered into the Credit Agreement with SCM Specialty Finance Opportunities Fund, L.P., or the Lender. Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Lender agreed to provide a revolving loan, or the Loan, to us in the maximum principal amount of $1.2 million. The maturity date of the Loan is September 28, 2018. The Loan bears interest at an annual rate equal to the Prime Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 2.75%, payable in cash monthly in arrears. The interest rate will be increased by 5.0% in the event of a default under the Credit Agreement. We have not yet drawn down on the credit facility.

As of March 31,September30, 2017, the Company is seeking to renegotiate the terms of the Credit Agreement and had not borrowed any funds under the Credit Agreement.

 

During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017, net cash used in operating activities was $4.1$12.9 million, of which $3.3$10.6 million was used in continuing operations and $0.8$2.3 million was used in discontinued operations. The main component of cash used in operating activities during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017 was a net loss of $7.2 million, a decrease in accrued payroll of $1.6$1.8 million and accrued liabilitiesaccounts payable of $0.7 million.$2.2 million related to past due obligations from the prior year. During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, net cash used in operating activities was $4.0$6.6 million, of which $1.8$5.1 million was used in continuing operations and $2.2$1.5 million was used in discontinued operations. The main component of cash used in operating activities during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 was our loss from continuing operations of $4.0$14.7 million.

 

There was net cash used in investing activities for the nine-months ended September 30, 2017 of $29,000. There was no net cash from investing activities for either period.in 2016.

 

For the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2017, there was net cash provided from financing activities of $10.7$24.0 million, which resulted from the issuance of common stock in our threefour direct offerings completed in the first quarternine months of 2017.2017 as well as the subsequent exercise of warrants related to those offerings. For the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, there was no cash provided from financing activities.

30

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Inflation

 

We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods presented. On an ongoing basis, we attempt to minimize any effects of inflation on our operating results by controlling operating costs and whenever possible, seeking to insure that billing rates reflect increases in costs due to inflation.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

None.

 

 31

 41

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives including that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible disclosure controls and procedures relative to their costs to implement and maintain.

 

Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of March 31, 2017 as a result of material weaknesses. Specifically, as of March 31, 2017,in 2016 during which time the following material weaknesses existed:

 

 We lack a sufficient complement of personnel to appropriately account for, review, and disclose the completeness and accuracy of transactions entered into by the Company.
   
 We lack sufficient qualified resources to ensure the appropriate design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, ineffective monitoring controls related to our accounting and reporting functions around management review were not adequately designed and/or operating effectively and can result in adjustments to our financial statements and disclosures.

 

Management believes that the material weaknesses noted arewere due in part to the small size of the staff resulting from staff downsizing and cost containment. As part of our remediation plan in 2017, we intend to takehave taken steps to improve our financial reporting and implementhave implemented new policies, procedures and controls in addition to seeking external assistance with ahiring competent accounting professionals to review of transactions recorded and classifiedclassifications in the financial statements, as well asstatements. Through the hiring of independent consultants we have also received external technical accounting assistance to review the accounting and related disclosures for complex accounting matters when necessary. Accordingly, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were greatly improved in 2017 and were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2017.

 

Changes in internal controls

 

ThereDuring the third quarter ended September 30, 2017 management believes that it has completed its remediation plan to address the material weaknesses that existed at the end of 2016 and through the first and second quarters of 2017. Other than the completion of this remediation plan, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 32

 42

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

“Item 3- Legal Proceedings” of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2017 includes a discussion of our legal proceedings, as does Note 6 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. During the fiscal quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2017,there have been no material changes fromto the legal proceedings discussed indisclosed within our 2016 Form 10-K, except as follows:supplemented and amended within our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017.

 

Brookwood MC Investors, LLC & MCII v, PDI, Inc.

On March 30, 2017, the Company received a tenancy summons and verified complaint for nonpayment of its Parsippany, New Jersey office rent. The complaint alleged amounts owing of $203,734 covering unpaid base rent of $54,075 from January through March 2017, as well as late charges, attorney’s fees, and the redeposit of a security deposit of $136,975. The plaintiff landlord sought a judgement for possession of the premises. A hearing in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County-Special Civil part, took place on April 21, 2017. The Company subsequently entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff landlord on May 9, 2017 whereas the landlord applied the security deposit against the unpaid rent and the Company agreed to a payment plan of $25,000 per month beginning in April 2017 and through September 2017 when the balance of amounts due are payable in full for the remainder of its lease which expires June 30, 2017. The first payment was made on April 28, 2017.

Prolias Technologies, Inc. v. PDI, Inc.

On February 16, 2017, the Company refiled its application for final judgment, and on March 9, 2017, the Superior Court of New Jersey entered a final judgment in the Company’s favor against Prolias for the sum of $636,053 plus ten percent interest continuing to accrue on the principal balance of $500,000 (per diem $136.99) unless and until paid. Final judgment was also entered in the Company’s favor, and against Prolias, declaring Prolias is deemed to have executed and delivered to the Company a promissory note in the amount of $1,000,000 and Prolias is obligated to repay the Company the principal amount and all interest in accordance with the terms of the promissory note and Article 10.2(a) of the Collaboration Agreement by and between Prolias and the Company. On March 17, 2017, the Company requested that the final judgment against Prolias be recorded as a statewide lien. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to recover on the judgment against Prolias.

Swann v. Akorn, Inc., and Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.

On May 27, 2016, Michael J. Swann, one of the Company’s former employees, filed a complaint against the Company in the Court of Common Pleas of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in South Carolina in a matter entitled Michael J. Swann v. Akorn, Inc.(“Akorn”), and Interpace Diagnostic Group Inc. (Civil Action No. 2016-CP-40-03362). Mr, Swann sought damages in an amount no less than $300,000. The Company had denied that it was liable to Mr. Swann for any of the claims asserted. On May 10, 2017 the Company received a settlement letter and paid the plaintiff $3,000.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

There have been no material changes during the period covered by this Form 10-Q to the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2017 andNot applicable as amended on April 28, 2017.we are a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

On March 23,July 5, 2017, the institutional investor who was the holderCompany agreed to issue a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, to a consultant of the RedPath Note, which hadCompany, who is an outstanding principal balanceaccredited investor, at an exercise price of $9.4 million and which such investor had acquired for $8.87 million, exchanged$1.25 in consideration of services to the RedPath Note for the Company’s Exchanged Non-Convertible Note withCompany in a principal balance of $3.55 million and the Company’s Exchanged Convertible Note with a principal balance of $5.32 million. Such exchange was made in reliance upon the exemptionprivate placement exempt from registration provided bypursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Subsequently on April 18, 2017, the institutional investor exchanged the Exchanged Non-Convertible Note with a principal balanceAct of $3.55 million for the Company’s Exchanged Convertible Note with a principal balance of $3.55 million. Such exchange was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Such institutional investor has exercised its rights to convert both Exchanged Convertible Notes into the Company’s common stock,1933, as described in the table below. Through these conversions, the outstanding amount of the Exchanged Convertible Notes was reduced to zero. The issuance of the shares of common stock upon conversion of the Exchanged Convertible Notes was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.amended.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

33

 

  Amount of Exchanged  Shares of  Conversion 
Date of Convertible Note,  company  price 
Conversion so converted  stock issued  per share 
March 23, 2017 $122,000   50,000  $2.44 
March 28, 2017  25,000   10,248   2.44 
March 29, 2017  1,275,000   522,648   2.44 
March 30, 2017  2,799,663   1,147,638   2.44 
April 3, 2017  200,000   81,992   2.44 
April 18, 2017  900,000   369,126   2.44 
April 18, 2017  3,547,775   1,613,777   2.20 
Totals $8,869,438   3,795,429     

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit No. Description
   
1.1 * Underwriting Agreement, dated as of February 3,June 16, 2017, by and between Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and Maxim Group LLC, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 3,June 21, 2017.
   
4.1 *4.1* Form of Prepaid Common Stock PurchaseAdditional Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 3,October 12, 2017.
   
4.2 *4.2* Warrant Agency Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2017, by and between Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
4.3*Form of Common Stock PurchaseUnderwriting Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 20,June 21, 2017.
   
4.1*Senior Secured Note, dated March 23, 2017, by Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. in favor of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. , incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2017.
4.24.4 * Senior Secured Convertible Note, dated March 23, 2017, by Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. in favor of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. , incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2017.
4.3*Form of Common Stock PurchasePre-Funded Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23,June 21, 2017.
   
10.14.5 * Placement AgencyForm of Base Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
10.1*Warrant Exercise Agreement, dated January 3,October 12, 2017, by and between Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and certain Warrant Holders, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2017.
10.2 *Form of Amendment and Exchange Agreement, dated April 18, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 3,April 18, 2017.
   
10.2 *10.4* Form of Securities PurchaseLease Agreement, dated January 3, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 3, 2017.
10.3 *Amended and Restated Placement Agency Agreement effective as of January 3, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on January 5, 2017.
10.3 *Form of Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement effective as of January 3, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on January 5, 2017.

34

10.4 *Placement Agency Agreement dated January 20, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 20, 2017.
10.5 *Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated January 20, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 20, 2017.
10.6 *Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 22,31, 2017, by and between Saddle Lane Realty, LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd., incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2017.
10.7 *Termination Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2017, by and among Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc., Interpace Diagnostics, LLC, Interpace Diagnostics Corporation, PDI Biopharma, LLC, Group DCA, LLC, Interpace Diagnostics Lab, Inc. and RedPath Equityholder Representative, LLC, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2017.
10.8 *Amended and Restated Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2017, by and among Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc., Interpace Diagnostics, LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Corporation and Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. , incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/S-1/A, filed with the SEC on March 27,June 13, 2017.
10.9 *Amended and Restated Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2017, by and among Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc., Interpace Diagnostics, LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Corporation and Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. , incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2017.
10.10 *Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of March 23, 2017, by Interpace Diagnostics, LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Corporation in favor of Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. , incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2017.
   
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
   
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
   
32.1+ Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.
   
32.2+ Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.
   
101 The following financial information from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2017 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 +Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibits be deemed to be incorporated by reference to any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in any such filing.
   
 *previously filed

 

 35

 44

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: May 12,November 13, 2017Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.
 (Registrant)
  
 /s/ Jack E. Stover
 Jack E. Stover
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
  
 /s/ James Early
 James Early
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 36

 45