UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018

 

OR

 

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

 

Commission File Number: 000-24249

 

Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 22-2919486

(State or other jurisdiction of


Incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer


Identification No.)

 

Morris Corporate Center 1, Building C

300 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ 07054

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

Morris Corporate Center 1, Building C
300 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, NJ 07054
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

 

(855) 776-6419

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(855) 776-6419
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer [  ]Accelerated filer [  ]Non-accelerated filer [  ]Smaller reporting company [X]
  

(Do not check if a smaller

reporting company)

 

Emerging Growth Company [  ]   

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

 

Class 

Shares Outstanding

NovemberAugust 3, 20172018

 
Common stock, $0.01 par value  26,849,02528,194,275 

 

 

 

 
 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBERJUNE 30, 20172018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Page No.
 PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION3
   
Item 1.Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements3
   
 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 (unaudited) and December 31, 201620173
   
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossOperations for the three- and nine-monthsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 20162017 (unaudited)4
   
 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine-monthsix-month period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 (unaudited)5
   
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine- monthsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 20162017 (unaudited)6
   
 Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements7
   
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations3022
   
Item 4.Controls and Procedures4234
   
 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION43
   
Item 1.Legal Proceedings4335
   
Item 1A.Risk Factors4335
   
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds4335
   
Item 6.Exhibits4435
   
Signatures4536

 

 2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

Item 1. Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016  June 30, 2018  December 31, 2017 
 (unaudited)     (unaudited)    
          
ASSETS                
Current assets:                
Cash and cash equivalents $11,703  $602  $10,084  $15,199 
Accounts receivable, net  2,803   2,209   7,647   3,437 
Other current assets  1,267   1,415   1,474   1,172 
Current assets from discontinued operations  -   14 
Total current assets  15,773   4,240   19,205   19,808 
Property and equipment, net  668   929   640   654 
Other intangible assets, net  33,919   36,358   31,480   33,105 
Other long-term assets  31   251   31   31 
Total assets $50,391  $41,778  $51,356  $53,598 
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable $704  $2,326  $1,173  $391 
Accrued salary and bonus  984   3,551 
Accrued salaries and bonus  938   1,394 
Other accrued expenses  5,331   6,236   4,304   5,004 
Current liabilities from discontinued operations  1,283   4,128   939   1,302 
Total current liabilities  8,302   16,241   7,354   8,091 
Contingent consideration  1,157   7,254   1,111   1,349 
Long-term debt, net of debt discount  -   7,908 
Other long-term liabilities  4,554   3,844   4,339   4,289 
Total liabilities  14,013   35,247   12,804   13,729 
                
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)                
                
Stockholders’ equity:                
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding  -   -   -   - 
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 22,975,754 and 2,230,506 shares issued, respectively; 22,911,404 and 2,176,252 shares outstanding, respectively  230   22 
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 28,267,344 and 27,900,806 shares issued, respectively; 28,194,275 and 27,836,456 shares outstanding, respectively  282   278 
Additional paid-in capital  164,611   127,736   174,360   173,062 
Accumulated deficit  (126,792)  (119,584)  (134,410)  (131,800)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  -   - 
Treasury stock, at cost (64,350 and 54,254 shares, respectively)  (1,671)  (1,643)
Treasury stock, at cost (73,069 and 64,350 shares, respectively)  (1,680)  (1,671)
Total stockholders’ equity  36,378   6,531   38,552   39,869 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $50,391  $41,778  $51,356  $53,598 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statementsstatements.

3

 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSSOPERATIONS

(unaudited, in thousands, except for per share data)

 

 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 September 30, September 30,  June 30,  June 30, 
 2017 2016 2017 2016  2018  2017  2018  2017 
                  
Revenue, net $4,202  $3,316  $11,527  $9,963  $5,501  $3,855  $10,310  $7,325 
Cost of revenue (excluding amortization of $813 and $970 for the three months and $2,439 and $2,909 for the nine months, respectively)  2,069   1,846   5,719   4,866 
Cost of revenue (excluding amortization of $813 and $813 for the three months and $1,626 and $1,626 for the six months, respectively)  2,247   1,879   4,827   3,651 
Gross profit  2,133   1,470   5,808   5,097   3,254   1,976   5,483   3,674 
Operating expenses:                                
Sales and marketing  1,816   1,282   4,507   4,186   2,095   1,555   4,086   2,691 
Research and development  483   659   1,202   1,339   518   413   1,019   719 
General and administrative  2,116   2,858   6,431   7,655   1,726   2,793   3,897   4,315 
Acquisition related amortization expense  813   970   2,439   2,909   813   813   1,626   1,626 
Asset impairment  -   3,363   -   3,363 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  -   (1,174)  (5,776)  (1,174)  -   -   -   (5,776)
Total operating expenses  5,228   7,958   8,803   18,278   5,152   5,574   10,628   3,575 
                                
Operating loss  (3,095)  (6,488)  (2,995)  (13,181)
Operating (loss) income  (1,898)  (3,598)  (5,145)  99 
Interest expense  (40)  (539)  (433)  (1,601)  -   (216)  -   (469)
Loss on extinguishment of debt  -   -   (4,278)  -   -   (2,731)  -   (4,278)
Other (loss) income, net  (294)  4   (414)  14 
Other income (expense), net  33   (8)  144   (44)
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (3,429)  (7,023)  (8,120)  (14,768)  (1,865)  (6,553)  (5,001)  (4,692)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes  (42)  173   (340)  (54)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  8   (301)  14   (298)
Loss from continuing operations  (3,387)  (7,196)  (7,780)  (14,714)  (1,873)  (6,252)  (5,015)  (4,394)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  71   (297)  572   101 
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax  (44)  (54)  (95)  502 
Net loss $(3,316) $(7,493) $(7,208) $(14,613) $(1,917) $(6,306) $(5,110) $(3,892)
                                
Net Loss and Comprehensive Loss $(3,316) $(7,493) $(7,208) $(14,613)
                
Basic and Diluted (loss) income per share of common stock:                
Basic (loss) income per share of common stock:                
From continuing operations $(0.15) $(3.96) $(0.65) $(8.16) $(0.07) $(0.65) $(0.18) $(0.64)
From discontinued operations  0.00   (0.16)  0.05   0.06   (0.00)  (0.01)  (0.00)  0.07 
Net loss per basic and diluted share of common stock $(0.15) $(4.13) $(0.60) $(8.10)
Net loss per basic share of common stock $(0.07) $(0.65) $(0.18) $(0.57)
                                
Diluted (loss) income per share of common stock:                
From continuing operations $(0.07) $(0.65) $(0.18) $(0.64)
From discontinued operations  (0.00)  (0.01)  (0.00)  0.07 
Net loss per diluted share of common stock $(0.07) $(0.65) $(0.18) $(0.57)
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding:                                
Basic  22,028   1,816   12,022   1,803   27,933   9,657   27,894   6,877 
Diluted  22,028   1,816   12,022   1,803   27,933   9,657   27,894   6,877 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited, in thousands)

  For The Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2018
  Shares  Amount 
Common stock:        
Balance at January 1  27,901  $278 
Common stock issued  366   4 
Balance at June 30  28,267   282 
Treasury stock:        
Balance at January 1  64   (1,671)
Treasury stock purchased  9   (9)
Balance at June 30  73   (1,680)
Additional paid-in capital:        
Balance at January 1      173,062 
Stock-based compensation expense      1,016 
Common stock issued      282 
Balance at June 30      174,360 
Accumulated deficit:        
Balance at January 1      (131,800)
Net loss      (5,110)
Adoption of ASC 606, see Note 3      2,500 
Balance at June 30      (134,410)
Total stockholders’ equity     $38,552 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 4

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited, in thousands)

  For The Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 2017 
  Shares  Amount 
Common stock:        
Balance at January 1  2,230  $22 
Common stock issued  34   1 
Common stock issued through offerings  13,568   135 
Shares issued in debt exchange  3,795   38 
Exercise of warrants 3,348   34 
Balance at September 30  22,975   230 
Treasury stock:        
Balance at January 1  54   (1,643)
Treasury stock purchased  10   (28)
Balance at September 30  64   (1,671)
Additional paid-in capital:        
Balance at January 1      127,736 
Common stock issued through offerings, net of expenses      13,984 
Issuance of warrants      7,553 
Shares issued in debt exchange      11,605 
Exercise of warrants      3,256 
Stock-based compensation expense      477 
Balance at September 30      164,611 
Accumulated deficit:        
Balance at January 1      (119,584)
Net loss      (7,208)
Balance at September 30      (126,792)
         
Total stockholders’ equity     $36,378 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

 5

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)

 

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities        
Net loss $(7,208) $(14,613)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  2,813   3,490 
Realignment accrual accretion  -   29 
Interest accretion  312   1,601 
Provision for bad debt  (6)  482 
Mark to market on warrants  401   - 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  117   - 
Mark to market on derivatives  61   - 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  4,278   - 
Reversal of severance accrual  (2,034)  - 
Non-employee share-based payment  216   - 
Stock-based compensation  477   109 
Asset impairment  -   3,363 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  (1,174)
Other gains and expenses, net  -   (4)
Other changes in assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease  in accounts receivable  (588)  4,639 
Decrease in unbilled receivable  -   16 
Decrease in other current assets  162   1,272 
Decrease in other long-term assets  220   754 
Decrease in accounts payable  (2,208)  (761)
Decrease in unearned contract revenue  -   (11)
Decrease in accrued salaries and bonus  (1,805)  (685)
Decrease in accrued liabilities  (2,210)  (4,561)
Decrease in long-term liabilities  (106)  (563)
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,884)  (6,617)
         
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities        
Purchase of property and equipment  (29)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (29)  - 
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses  24,042   - 
Cash paid for repurchase of restricted shares  (28)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  24,014   - 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  11,101   (6,617)
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning  602   8,310 
Cash and cash equivalents – ending $11,703  $1,693 
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2018  2017 
       
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities        
Net loss $(5,110) $(3,892)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  1,710   1,937 
Interest accretion  1   271 
Provision for bad debt  -   25 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  -   117 
Mark to market on derivatives  -   61 
Reversal of severance accrual  -   (2,034)
Reversal of DOJ accrual  (350)  - 
Mark to market on warrants  (66)  76 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  -   4,278 
Stock-based compensation, consulting agreements  24   - 
Stock-based compensation  1,016   206 
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  -   (5,776)
Other changes in assets and liabilities:        
Increase  in accounts receivable  (1,710)  (512)
(Increase) decrease in other current assets  (40)  53 
Decrease in other long-term assets  -   220 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable  782   (1,358)
Decrease in accrued salaries and bonus  (456)  (1,549)
Decrease in other accrued expenses  (944)  (789)
Increase in other long-term liabilities  116   94 
Net cash used in operating activities  (5,027)  (8,572)
         
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities        
Purchase of property and equipment  (79)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (79)  - 
         
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities        
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses  -   22,263 
Cash paid for repurchase of restricted shares  (9)  (28)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (9)  22,235 
         
Net (decrease) increase  in cash and cash equivalents  (5,115)  13,663 
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning  15,199   602 
Cash and cash equivalents – ending $10,084  $14,265 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 

 6

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes (the “Interim Financial Statements”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Interpace”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Interpace Diagnostics Corporation,Lab Inc., Interpace Diagnostics Lab, Inc.Corporation and Interpace Diagnostics, LLC, and related notes as included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2017, as amended on April 28, 2017.23, 2018. The condensed Interim Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The condensed Interim Financial Statements include all normal recurring adjustments that, in the judgment of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such interim financial statements. Discontinued operations include the Company’s wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries: Group DCA, LLC, (“Group DCA”); InServe Support Solutions (“Pharmakon”);Solutions; and TVG, Inc. (“TVG”, dissolved December 31, 2014) and its Commercial Services Organization (“CSO”) business unit which was sold on December 22, 2015. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Results of operations, cash flows and comprehensive incomeOperating results for the three and nine-month periodssix-month period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2018.

 

2.LIQUIDITY

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis that assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of operations, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $11.7$10.1 million, net accounts receivable of $2.8$7.6 million, total current assets of $15.8$19.2 million and total current liabilities of $8.3$7.4 million. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the Company had a net loss of $7.2$5.1 million and cash used in operating activities was $12.9$5.0 million.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company closed on four equity offerings raising gross proceeds of $27.9 million. The details are as follows:

On January 6, 2017, the Company completed a registered direct public offering (the “Second Registered Direct Offering”), to sell 630,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $6.81 per share to certain institutional investors, which resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4.2 million.
On January 25, 2017, the Company completed a registered direct public offering (the “Third Registered Direct Offering”), to sell 855,000 shares of its common stock and a concurrent private placement of warrants to purchase 855,000 shares of its common stock (the “Concurrent Warrants”), to the same investors participating in the Third Registered Direct Offering, (or the “Private Placement”). The Concurrent Warrants and the shares of its common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Concurrent Warrants were not registered under the Securities Act and were sold pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares of common stock sold in the Third Registered Direct Offering and the Concurrent Warrants issued in the concurrent Private Placement were issued separately but sold together at a combined purchase price of $4.69 per share of common stock and accompanying Concurrent Warrant. The 855,000 unregistered Concurrent Warrants also have an exercise price of $4.69 and have a five-year term. The Third Registered Direct Offering and the Private Placement together resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4.0 million. The Company used approximately $1.0 million of the proceeds to satisfy the severance obligations due to five former senior executives.

 7

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited) 

On February 8, 2017, the Company completed an underwritten, confidentially marketed public offering (“CMPO”), to sell 1,200,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $3.00 per share. In addition, the Company granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 9% of the total number of shares of common stock sold by the Company in the CMPO, solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. The CMPO resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $3.9 million, including the over-allotment.
On June 21, 2017, pursuant to its S-1 filing of its preliminary prospectus to register shares on May 22, 2017, as amended thereafter, the Company completed a public offering (the “Offering”) for 9,900,000 shares of common stock together with an equal number of common warrants (the “Base Warrants”), to purchase shares of its common stock (and the shares of common stock that are issuable from time to time upon exercise of the common warrants) for $1.10 per share. Each Base Warrant upon exercise at a price of $1.25 will result in the issuance of one share of common stock to the holder. A public trading market for the Base Warrants was established on July 5, 2017 on the OTC market under the trading symbol IDGGW. As part of the Offering, which closed on June 21, 2017, the related underwriters purchased the full over-allotment of 1,875,000 Base Warrants available to them for the specified $.01 per warrant. 2,600,000 of Pre-Funded Warrants were also sold at the specified $1.09 per warrant. The combined gross proceeds of the Offering totaled $13.7 million with approximately $12.3 million of net funds available to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and other stock issuance expenses. As of July 7, 2017 all of the 2,600,000 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised for the $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued. On July 31, the Company and the underwriters closed on the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase an additional 875,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.09 per share for gross proceeds of $0.960 million.

 8

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

During September 2017 the Company received approximately $0.9 million from the exercise of 747,800 Base Warrants issued as part of the Offering.

Subsequent to September 2017 the Company received approximately $6.2 million from the exercise of BaseWarrants issued as part of the Offering, as follows:

During October 2017 the Company received approximately $1.2 million from the exercise of approximately 925,000 Base Warrants.
On October 12, 2017 the Company entered into an agreement with certain holders of Base Warrants to exercise 4 million Base Warrants at the exercise price of $1.25 in exchange for 3.2 million additional private placement warrants with an exercise price of $1.80, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $5.0 million. The new warrants may not be exercised for six months from the issue date and expire in five and one-half years from their issuance date.

As part of our acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc., we issued a non-negotiable subordinated secured, non-interest bearing, promissory note, dated as of October 31, 2014, with an aggregate principal amount of $10.7 million outstanding (the “RedPath Note”). In December 2016 we repaid $1.33 million in principal of the RedPath Note resulting in an outstanding balance of $9.34 million. The RedPath Note was subsequently acquired by a single institutional investor (the “Investor”) for $8.87 million on March 22, 2017. Also on that date we and the Investor exchanged the RedPath Note for a senior secured convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million and a senior secured non-convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $3.55 million. On April 18, 2017, we and the Investor exchanged the senior secured non-convertible note for $3.55 million of our senior secured convertible note. Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the senior secured convertible notes were converted in full for 3,795,429 shares of our common stock. We no longer have any outstanding secured debt, and any security interests and liens related to our former secured debt have been fully settled.

The Company entered into a Credit Agreement with SCM Specialty Finance Opportunities Fund, L.P. (the “Credit Agreement”) on September 28, 2016 for $1.2 million. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties in favor of the Lender and certain covenants, including, among other things, financial covenants relating to loan turnover rates, liquidity and revenue targets. As of September 30, 2017 the Company is renegotiating terms of the Credit Agreement and has not borrowed any funds under the Credit Agreement.

While the Company has significantly increased its cash balance and has eliminated its long term indebtedness, the Company does not expect to generate positive cash flows from operations for the year ending December 31, 2017.2018. The Company believes however, that it has sufficient cash balances to meet near term obligations and further intends to meet its capital needs by revenue growth, containing costs, entering into strategic alliances as well as exploring other options, including the possibility of raising additional debt or equity capital as necessary. There is, however, no assurance the Company will be successful in meeting its capital requirements prior to becoming cash flow positive.

 9

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

3.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Accounting Estimates

 

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on historical experience, facts and circumstances available at the time, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Significant estimates include best estimate of selling price in multiple element arrangements,accounting for valuation allowances related to deferred income taxes, self-insurance loss accruals,contingent consideration, allowances for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, unrecognized tax benefits, and notes, income tax accruals, acquisition accounting, useful lives andasset impairments of long-lived assets and facilities realignment accruals.involving other intangible assets. The Company periodically reviews these matters and reflects changes in estimates in earnings as appropriate. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Through the Company’sOur Services

We are a fully integrated commercial and bioinformatics company that develops and provides clinically useful molecular diagnostics business, the Company aims to provide physiciansdiagnostic tests and patients withpathology services. We develop and commercialize molecular diagnostic options for detecting genetictests and other molecular alterations that are associated with gastrointestinal, endocrine and lung cancers, which arerelated first line assays principally focused on early detection of patients at high risk of cancer. Customerscancer and leverage the latest technology and personalized medicine for improved patient diagnosis and management. We currently have four commercialized molecular diagnostic assays in the Company’smarketplace for which we are receiving reimbursement: PancraGEN®, which is a pancreatic cyst and pancreaticobiliary solid lesion molecular diagnostics business consist primarilytest that helps physicians better assess risk of physicians, hospitalspancreaticobiliary cancers using our proprietary PathFinderTG®platform; ThyGenX®(now known as ThyGeNEXT™), which is an oncogenic mutation panel that helps identify malignant thyroid nodules; ThyraMIR®, which assesses thyroid nodules for risk of malignancy utilizing a proprietary microRNA gene expression assay; and clinics. Under current GAAP, we recognizeRespriDX™, launched in September 2017, for assessing metastatic versus primary lung cancer tumors. RespriDX™ also utilizes our PathFinderTG® platform and compares the genetic fingerprint of two or more sites of lung cancer to determine whether the neoplastic deposits are representative of a recurrence of cancer or a new primary (independent) cancer. We are also “soft launching” BarreGEN®, an esophageal cancer risk classifier for Barrett’s Esophagus that also utilizes our PathFinder TG®platform.

Adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 which amends the guidance for the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers for the transfer of goods and services, rendered whenby using the modified-retrospective method applied to any contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The results for the reporting period beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented in accordance with the new standard, although comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards and policies in effect for those periods.

Upon adoption, the Company performed a comprehensive analysis of existing revenue arrangements as of January 1, 2018 following fourthe five-step model outlined in ASC 606. Based on our analysis, we recorded a cumulative adjustment to opening accumulated deficit and increase of accounts receivable of $2.5 million as of January 1, 2018. The cumulative impact was driven by a change in the timing of revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement or contract exists; services have been rendered; the selling price is fixed or determinable;for certain payer categories and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company’s services are generally considered rendered upon completion of the test and review and release of the test results, at which time the Company bills the third-party payer or hospital. We recognize revenue on an accrual basis when we are able to make a reasonable estimate of reimbursement at the time delivery is complete. In the first period in which revenue is accrued for a particular payer or test, there generally is a one-time increase in revenue. Until we have contracts with payers or can reasonably estimate the amount that will ultimately be received, we recognize the related revenue on the cash basis. Because the timing and amountproprietary tests performed. The balance of cash payments received from payers as well as one-time increases in revenue from newly accrued payers are difficult to predict, we expect that our revenue may fluctuate significantly in any given quarter.

The Company currently recognizes revenue and accounts receivable related to billingsthe adjustment is approximately $0.9 million as of June 30, 2018.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following tables present the effect of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 on our condensed consolidated balance sheet and revenue as of and for Medicare and Medicare Advantage, on an accrual basis, net of contractual adjustment, as well as for hospitals (direct-bill clients), when collectability is reasonably assured. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between the list prices and the reimbursement rate set by Medicare and Medicare Advantage, or the amounts billed to hospitals.six months ended June 30, 2018:

 

SpecificallyConsolidated Balance Sheet:

  June 30, 2018 
     (unaudited)    
  As reported  Balances without Adoption of ASC 606  Effect of Change
Higher/(Lower)
 
Accounts receivable, net $7,647  $6,731  $916 
Accumulated deficit  (134,410)  (136,910)  (2,500)

Revenue:

  For the six months ended June 30, 2018 
     (unaudited)    
  As reported  Balances without Adoption of ASC 606  Effect of Change
Higher/(Lower)
 
Revenue, net $10,310  $9,580  $730 

Historically, for certain third-party payers that did not have established contractual reimbursement rates or a predictable pattern of collectability, including commercial insurance carriers, Medicaid and certain direct-bill payers (primarily hospitals, but also laboratories), the Company previously recognized revenues when the fee was fixed or determinable and collectability was reasonably assured, which was upon request of third-party payer notification of payment or when cash was received. Under the new standard, the Company estimates the variable consideration within the transaction price for all third-party payers and proprietary tests and recognizes revenue as the Company satisfies its performance obligations.

In addition, the Company updated its estimates of the expected transaction price and related reimbursement rates for its payer categories and related proprietary tests based on the variable consideration guidance in ASC 606. This consisted of updating the reimbursement rates realized by test, PancraGEN®the Company’s proprietary tests based on historical amounts received by each payer category for the corresponding tests performed.

Overall, other than an initial acceleration in the timing of our revenue recognition for certain payer categories, the adoption of this new standard will not have a significant impact on our reported total revenues and operating results as compared to amounts that would have been recorded onreported under the accrual basisprior revenue recognition standard over our typical revenue cycle. Our accounting policies under the new standard were applied prospectively and are discussed further below.

Revenue Recognition after adoption of ASC 606

Upon adoption of ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in eachan amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of these categories since its acquisition in 2014. ThyGenX® has been recorded on an accrual basis since its Medicare approval in 2015 in two of the payer categories, Medicare and Medicare Advantage, and ThyraMIR®, a newer test, approved for Medicare in 2016, has been moved from cash basis to accrual basisvariable consideration that should be included in the same categories as ThyGenX, Medicare and Medicare Advantage in 2017, effective intransaction price using the current quarter. As of September 30, 2017 there are no revenues for the Company’s lung assay called RespriDX™.expected value method based on historical experience.

 

 10

9
 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

The Company derives its revenues from the performance of its proprietary tests. The Company’s performance obligation is fulfilled upon completion, review and release of test results to the customer. The Company subsequently bills third-party payers or direct-bill payers for the proprietary tests performed. Revenue is recognized based on the estimated transaction price or net realizable value (“NRV”), which is determined based on historical collection rates by each payer category for each proprietary test offered by the Company. The Company regularly reviews the ultimate amounts received from the third-party payers and related estimated reimbursement rates and adjusts the NRV’s and related contractual allowances accordingly. If actual collections and related NRV’s vary from our estimates, we will adjust the estimates of contractual allowances, which would affect net revenue in the period such variances become known.

Disaggregated Revenues

 

The Company also provides services by way

We operate in a single operating segment and, therefore, the results of commercial insurance carriers or governmental programs that may or may not haveour operations are reported on a contract or coverage in placeconsolidated basis for its proprietary tests. As contractspurposes of segment reporting, which is consistent with internal management reporting. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and coverage progress for payers in these categories,June 30, 2017, the Company will evaluate their collection history to determine the appropriate time to begin to recognized specific payers on the accrual basis as well. Currently, all are recognized on the cash basis. The Company does not enter into direct agreements with patients that commit them to pay any portionmajority of the costCompany’s revenues were derived from its molecular diagnostic tests.

Financing and Payment

Our payment terms vary by third-party payers and type of proprietary testing services performed. The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant.

Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Customer Contract

Sales commissions are expensed when incurred because the testsamortization period would have been one year or less. These costs are recorded in sales and marketing expense in the event that their commercial insurance carrier or governmental program does not pay the Company for its services; however, the Company does offer patients that do not have adequate insurance coverage the opportunity to pay cash for our services at a reduced rate.condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

The Company’s accounts receivable represent unconditional rights to consideration and are generated using its proprietary tests. The Company’s services are fulfilled upon completion of the test, review and release of the test results. In conjunction with fulfilling these services, the Company recognizes Accounts Receivable as revenue is accrued, based upon its criteriabills the third-party payer or direct-bill payer. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, the Company recognized accounts receivable related to billings for revenue recognition. The Company also recordsMedicare, Medicare Advantage, and direct-bill payers on an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts based on the collection history for its accrual basis, payer. For non-paying rosternet of contractual adjustment, when collectability was reasonably assured. Under ASC 606 accounts balances are generallyreceivable is now recognized for all payer groups, net of contractual adjustment and net of estimated uncollectable amounts. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between the list prices and the reimbursement rates set by third party payers, including Medicare, commercial payers, and amounts billed to direct-bill payers. Specific accounts may be written off after twelve months. Medicare and Medicare Advantage accounts are currently written off after eighteen months to allow for the appeal process,several appeals, which in some cases requires several appeals prior to collection.may take longer than twelve months.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Other Current Assets

 

Other current assets consisted of the following as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:

 

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Indemnification assets $875  $875 
Other receivables  247   325 
Other  145   215 
  $1,267  $1,415 
  June 30, 2018  December 31, 2017 
  (unaudited)    
       
Indemnification asset $875  $875 
Prepaid assets  556   266 
Other  43   31 
  $1,474  $1,172 

 

Long-Lived Assets, including Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

 

Finite-lived intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization of finite-lived acquired intangible assets is recognized on a straight-line basis, using the estimated useful lives of the assets of approximately two years to nine years in acquisition related amortization expense in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.operations.

 

The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized by reducing the recorded value of the asset to its fair value measured by future discounted cash flows. This analysis requires estimates of the amount and timing of projected cash flows and, where applicable, judgments associated with, among other factors, the appropriate discount rate. Such estimates are critical in determining whether any impairment charge should be recorded and the amount of such charge if an impairment loss is deemed to be necessary.

 11

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

Discontinued Operations

 

The Company accounts for business dispositions and its businesses held for sale in accordance with ASC 205-20,Discontinued Operations.Operations (“ASC 205-20”). ASC 205-20 requires the results of operations of business dispositions to be segregated from continuing operations and reflected as discontinued operations in current and prior periods. See Note 11,Discontinued Operations for further information.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

Basic and Diluted (Loss) IncomeNet Loss per Share

A reconciliation of the number of shares of common stock used in the calculation of basic and diluted (loss) incomeloss per share for the three- and nine-monthsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 20162017 is as follows:

 

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Basic weighted average number of common shares  22,028   1,816   12,022   1,803 
Potential dilutive effect of stock-based awards -  -  -  - 
Diluted weighted average number of common shares 22,028  1,816  12,022  1,803 

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2018  2017  2018  2017 
  (unaudited) 
             
Basic weighted average number of common shares  27,933   9,657   27,894   6,877 
Potential dilutive effect of stock-based awards  -   -   -   - 
Diluted weighted average number of common shares  27,933   9,657   27,894   6,877 

 

The following outstanding stock-based awardsinstruments were excluded from the computation of the effect of dilutive securities on (loss) incomeloss per share for the following periods because they would have been anti-dilutive:

 

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Options  1,496   -   1,496   - 
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs)  84   103   84   103 
Restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs)  68   115   68   115 
Warrants  15,267   -   15,267   - 
  16,915  218  16,915  218 

 12

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2018  2017  2018  2017 
  (unaudited) 
             
Options  2,256   323   2,256   323 
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs)  59   85   59   85 
Restricted stock units (RSUs)  220   68   220   68 
Warrants  13,542   17,105   13,542   17,105 
   16,077   17,581   16,077   17,581 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

4.OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

The net carrying value of the identifiable intangible assets as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 are as follows:

 

   As of June 30, 2018 As of December 31, 2017 
   As of September 30, 2017 As of December 31, 2016    (unaudited)   
 Life Carrying Carrying  Life Carrying Carrying 
 (Years) Value Value  (Years) Amount Amount 
Diagnostic assets:                      
Asuragen acquisition:                      
Thyroid  9  $8,519  $8,519   9  $8,519  $8,519 
RedPath acquisition:                      
Pancreas test  7   16,141   16,141   7   16,141   16,141 
Barrett’s test 9   18,351   18,351   9   18,351   18,351 
Total    $43,011  $43,011     $43,011  $43,011 
Diagnostic lab:                      
CLIA Lab  2.3  $609  $609   2.3  $609  $609 
                      
Accumulated Amortization    $(9,701) $(7,262)    $(12,140) $(10,515)
                      
Net Carrying Value    $33,919  $36,358     $31,480  $33,105 

 

Amortization expense was approximately $0.8 million and $1.0 million for the three-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively, and approximately $2.4 million and $2.9$1.6 million for the nine-monthsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. Amortization of our diagnostic assets begins upon launch of the product. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows, based on current assumptions of future product launches:

 

 2017 2018  2019  2020  2021 
$3,252 $3,252  $5,292  $5,292  $4,908 

2018  2019  2020  2021  2022 
$3,252  $5,292  $5,292  $4,908  $2,987 

 

5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their relative short-term nature. The Company'sCompany’s financial assets and liabilities reflected at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial statements include: cashinclude contingent consideration and cash equivalents; accounts receivable; other current assets; accounts payable; and contingent consideration.warrant liability. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including the market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based upon observable inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values into three broad levels as follows:

 

 13

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 Level 1:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
   
 Level 2:Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
   
 Level 3:Valuations which incorporate unobservable inputs that reflect managementcertain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The valuation methodologies used for the Company’s financial assets and liabilitiesinstruments measured on a recurring basis at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, isare set forth in the tables below:

 

  As of September 30, 2017  Fair Value Measurements 
  Carrying  Fair  As of September 30, 2017 
  Amount  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents:                    
Cash $11,703  $11,703  $11,703  $            -  $- 
  $11,703  $11,703  $11,703  $-  $- 
Liabilities:                    
Contingent consideration:                    
Asuragen $1,407  $1,407  $-  $-  $1,407 
Other long-term liabilities:                    
Warrant liability  733   733   -   -   733 
  $2,140  $2,140  $-  $-  $2,140 
  As of June 30, 2018  Fair Value Measurements 
  Carrying  Fair  As of June 30, 2018 
  Amount  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
  (unaudited) 
Liabilities:                    
Contingent consideration:                    
Asuragen(1) $1,427  $1,427  $-  $-  $1,427 
Other long-term liabilities:                    
Warrant liability(2)  407   407   -   -   407 
  $1,834  $1,834  $-  $-  $1,834 

 

 14

  As of December 31, 2017  Fair Value Measurements 
  Carrying  Fair  As of December 31, 2017 
  Amount  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Liabilities:                    
Contingent consideration:                    
Asuragen(1) $1,581  $1,581  $-  $-  $1,581 
Other long-term liabilities:                    
Warrant liability(2)  473   473   -   -   473 
  $2,054  $2,054  $-  $-  $2,054 

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

  As of December 31, 2016  Fair Value Measurements 
  Carrying  Fair  As of December 31, 2016 
  Amount  Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents:                    
Cash $602  $602  $602  $-  $- 
  $602  $602  $602  $-  $- 
Liabilities:                    
Contingent consideration:                    
Asuragen $1,545  $1,545  $-  $-  $1,545 
RedPath  5,969   5,969   -   -   5,969 
  $7,514  $7,514  $-  $-  $7,514 

Cash(1)(2)See Note 7,Accrued Expenses and cash equivalents are valued using market prices in active markets (level 1). As of September 30, 2017, the Company did not have any marketable securities in less active markets (level 2) or without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (level 3).Long-Term Liabilities

 

In connection with the acquisition of certain assets from Asuragen, and the acquisition of RedPath, the Company recorded contingent consideration related to contingent payments and other revenue basedrevenue-based payments. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration based on a probability-weighted income approach derived from revenue estimates. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. On March 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, the RedPath Equityholder Representative agreed to terminate all royalty and milestone rights under the contingent consideration agreement. As a result the Company reversed approximately $6.0 million in Redpath contingent consideration liabilities in the first quarter of 2017, of which $5.8 million was a reversal within operating expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

 

On March 23, 2017, in connection with the Company entering into the Exchange Agreement, related to the RedPath Note (See Note 2,Liquidity and Note 12,Long-Term Debt) with the Investor, an embedded conversion option derivative liability was recorded due to a certain embedded conversion feature. The embedded conversion option is considered a liability and valued using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing Model, the inputs for which include exercise price of the conversion feature, market price of the underlying common shares, expected term, volatility based on the Company’s historical market price, and the risk-free rate corresponding to the expected term of the Exchange Agreement. Any changes to the estimated fair value of this liability were recorded in Interest Expense. Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the Investor had fully converted all outstanding debt, and as a result there are no liabilities remaining subsequent to April 18, 2017.

On June 21, 2017, the Company closed on an Offering (See Note 2,Liquidity),a public offering issuing both Pre-Funded Warrants and Underwriters Warrants to purchase 2,600,000 shares and 575,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. Both the Pre-Funded and Underwriters Warrants include a cash settlement feature in the event of certain circumstances. Accordingly, both the Pre-Funded and Underwriters Warrants are classified as liabilities and were fair valued using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing Model, the inputs for which includeincluded exercise price of the respective warrants, market price of the underlying common shares, expected term, volatility based on the Company’s historical market price, and the risk-free rate corresponding to the expected term of the Exchange Agreement.underlying agreement. Changes to the fair value of the warrant liabilities wereare recorded toin Other (loss) income (expense), net. The Pre-Funded Warrants were fully exercised as of September 30,in 2017 and therefore the Company has no remaining liability associated with those warrants.

 15

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

A roll forward of the carrying value of the contingentContingent consideration embedded conversion optionliability and warrant liabilities from December 31, 2016the Underwriters’ Warrant to SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 is as follows:

 

  December 31, 2016  Initial Liability  Payments  Accretion  Cancellation
of Obligation/
Conversions Exercises
  Mark to Market  September 30, 2017 
Contingent consideration:                            
Asuragen $1,545      $(260) $122  $-  $-  $1,407 
Redpath  5,969       -   -   (5,969)  -   - 
Embedded conversion option  -   208   -   -   (269)  61   - 
Pre-Funded Warrants  -   2,247   -   -   (2,337)  90   - 
Underwriters Warrants  -   422   -   -   -   311   733 
  $7,514  $2,877  $(260) $122  $(8,575) $462  $2,140 
           Cancellation  Mark to    
  December 31,        of Obligation/  Market  June 30, 
  2017  Payments  Accretion  Conversions  Adjustment  2018 
  (unaudited) 
                   
Asuragen $1,581  $(155) $1  $-  $-  $1,427 
                         
Underwriters Warrant  473   -       -   (66)  407 
  $2,054  $(155) $1  $-  $(66) $1,834 

 

The

Certain of the Company’s non-financial instruments, which primarily consist ofassets, such as other intangible assets, and property and equipment, are not required to be measuredre-measured at fair value on a recurringnonrecurring basis, if and are reported at carrying value. However, on a periodic basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be fully recoverable (and at least annually for indefinite-lived intangible assets), non-financial instruments are assessed forwhen there is an indicator of impairment and, if applicable, written-down to and recorded at fair value considering market participant assumptions.only when an impairment charge is recognized.

 

6.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Litigation

 

Due to the nature of the businesses in which the Company is engaged it is subject to certain risks. Such risks include, among others, risk of liability for personal injury or death to persons using products the Company promotes or commercializes. There can be no assurance that substantial claims or liabilities will not arise in the future due to the nature of the Company’s business activities and recent increases in litigation related to healthcare products. As part of the closeout of its CSO business, the Company seeks to reduce its potential liability under its service agreements through measures such as contractual indemnification provisions with customers (the scope of which may vary from customer to customer, and the performance of which is not secured) and insurance.

The Company could however, also be held liable for errors and omissions of its employees in connection with the services it performs that are outside the scope of any indemnity or insurance policy. The Company could be materially adversely affected if it were required to pay damages or incur defense costs in connection with a claim that is outside the scope of an indemnification agreement; if the indemnity, although applicable, is not performed in accordance with its terms; or if the Company’s liability exceeds the amount of applicable insurance or indemnity.

 

As of June 30, 2018, the Company’s accrual for litigation and threatened litigation was not material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 16

15
 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

The Company routinely assesses its litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and records its best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where the Company assesses the likelihood of loss as probable. The Company accrues for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In addition, in the event the Company determines that a loss is not probable, but is reasonably possible, and it becomes possible to develop what the Company believes to be a reasonable range of possible loss, then the Company will include disclosures related to such matter as appropriate and in compliance with ASC 450. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that the losses could exceed the amounts already accrued, the Company will, as applicable, adjust the accrual in the period the determination is made, disclose an estimate of the additional loss or range of loss, indicate that the estimate is immaterial with respect to its financial statements as a whole or, if the amount of such adjustment cannot be reasonably estimated, disclose that an estimate cannot be made. As of September 30, 2017, the Company's accrual for litigation and threatened litigation was not material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.RedPath – DOJ Settlement

 

In connection with the October 31, 2014 acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc., (“RedPath”), the Company assumed a liability for the settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) entered into by the former owners of RedPath with the Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement,settlement agreement, the Company iswas obligated to make payments to the DOJ for the calendar years ended December 31, 2014 through 2017, up to a cumulative maximum amount of $3.0 million.

Payments arewere due on March 31st following the calendar year in which the revenue milestones arewere achieved. In May 2017, the Company renegotiated payment terms with the DOJ related to a $0.5 million payment due associated with performance in fiscal 2016. The negotiations resulted in an agreement that the Company pay $83,335 on July 3, 2017, and $83,333 for the five remaining months of 2017. The Company made payments of approximately $0.3totaling $0.5 million induring the three monthsyear ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30,December 31, 2017 the Company hasrelated to fiscal 2016 and had accrued $0.5 million for the remainder of these payments and its estimate of the potential liability for fiscal 2017, based upon the termsfinal year of the Settlement Agreement.settlement agreement. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with the DOJ to settle in full the outstanding fiscal 2017 liability at approximately $0.15 million and paid this amount as the final settlement payment in July 2018.

 

Prolias Technologies, Inc. v. PDI, Inc.

 

On April 8, 2015, Prolias Technologies, Inc. (“Prolias”) filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) against the Company with the Superior Court of New Jersey (Morris County) (the “Court”) in a matter entitled Prolias Technologies, Inc. v. PDI, Inc. (Docket No. MRS-L-899-15). In the Complaint, Prolias alleged that it and the Company entered into an August 19, 2013 Collaboration Agreementcollaboration agreement and a First Amendmentan amendment thereto (collectively, the “Agreement”) whereby Prolias and the Company agreed to work in good faith to commercialize a diagnostic test known as “Thymira.” After various motions on October 13, 2016, the Company filed an application to enter final judgment and taxing of costs against Prolias. The Company requested that the Court enter final judgment against Prolias and for the Company.

 17

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

On March 9, 2017, the Court entered a final judgment in the Company’s favor against Prolias for the sum of $636,053 plus ten percent interest continuing to accrue on the principal balance of $500,000 (per diem $136.99) unless and until paid. Final judgment was also entered in the Company’s favor and against Prolias, declaring Prolias is deemed to have executed and delivered to the Company a promissory note in the amount of $1,000,000 and Prolias is obligated to repay the Company the principal amount and all interest in accordance with the terms of the promissory note and Article 10.2(a) of the Collaboration Agreement by and between Prolias and the Company.Agreement. On April 3, 2017, the final judgment against Prolias was recorded as a statewide lien. NoThe Company has not recovered on the judgment against Prolias and no assurance however, can be given that the Company will ever be able to recover on the judgment against Prolias.

Severance

During the first quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Company recorded additional severance obligations as it continued to right-size the organization and wind down its CSO business. The Company recorded obligations of $1.1 million, $0.5 million of which was recorded in continuing operations.

The severance liability as of December 31, 2016 was approximately $3.1 million, of which $2.2 million is classified in continuing operations and $0.9 million is in discontinued operations. In January 2017, five former executives agreed to a settlement of their severance obligations agreeing to 35% of the total amount due them. These remaining obligations were paid out in February 2017 in payments totaling approximately $1.0 million. As a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a reversal of expense of approximately $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2017. Within continuing operations, $1.5 million of expense was reversed and was recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss and $0.5 million was recorded in discontinued operations. The Company has no severance obligations as of September 30, 2017.

Parsippany Lease

Our corporate headquarters are located in Parsippany, New Jersey where we had been leasing approximately 23,000 square feet on an operating lease scheduled to run through June 2017. On May 24, 2017 the Company entered into a new lease with its Parsippany landlord. The lease is for a space of approximately 5,900 square feet and is for a period of sixty-three months commencing July 1, 2017 at an initial monthly obligation of approximately $13,000 per month subject to annual increases of fifty cents per square foot. The initial year of the lease has a two-month rent abatement period. The lease has an early termination date of June 30, 2020 at the option of the Company, provided at least 12 months’ notice is given in advance.future.

 

Pittsburgh Lease

 

On September 26, 2017March 15, 2018, the Company renewed itsamended the lease for its Pittsburgh laboratory for an additional three months.to extend it through June 30, 2023. The lease is for 20,000 square feet of laboratory and office space, and now endswith monthly base rent of $33,333 beginning July 1, 2018, escalating by twenty-five percent (25%) on June 30, 2018.July 1, 2019 to $41,667 per month. The lease obligation remainsCompany may, at $32,500 per month forits option, extend the full term of the lease.

 18

Lease for two consecutive terms of five years each, with the monthly base rent escalating by ten percent (10%) for each of the additional five year terms.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

7.ACCRUED EXPENSES AND LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

Other accrued expenses consisted of the following as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:

 

  June 30, 2018  December 31, 2017 
   (unaudited)     
         
Accrued royalties $573  $296 
Indemnification liability  875   875 
Contingent consideration  316   232 
DOJ settlement  150   500 
Accrued professional fees  690   700 
Taxes payable  471   515 
Unclaimed property  565   565 
All others  664   1,321 
  $4,304  $5,004 

 

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Accrued royalties $931  $711 
Indemnification liability  875   875 
Contingent consideration  250   260 
Rent payable  18   110 
DOJ settlement  542   80 
Accrued professional fees  687   1,746 
Taxes payable  389   526 
Unclaimed property  565   565 
Directors' Fees  41   40 
Research related liabilities  388   496 
All others  1,074   1,363 
  $5,331  $6,236 

Other long-termLong-term liabilities consisted of the following as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:

 

 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016  June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 
 (unaudited)   
     
Warrant liability $407  $473 
Uncertain tax positions $3,733  $3,594   3,838   3,734 
DOJ settlement (indemnified by RedPath)  -   250 
Warrant liability  733   - 
Other  88   -   94   82 
 $4,554  $3,844  $4,339  $4,289 

 

8.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Incentive Plan

In 2015,The Company’s stock-incentive program is a long-term retention program that is intended to attract, retain and provide incentives for talented employees, officers and directors, and to align stockholder and employee interests. Currently, the board of directors (the “Board”)Company is able to grant options, SARs and stockholders approvedrestricted shares from the Company’sInterpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Award and Incentive Plan, (or the(the “Amended and Restated2004 Plan”). The Amended and Restated Plan authorized an additional 245,000 shares for new awards and also included the remaining shares available under the prior Amended and Restated Plan. On September 14, 2017, the Company stockholders approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available for sale thereunder by 3,700,000 shares, of which 184,647 shares represented stockholders’ approval of contingent awards. Eligible participants under the Amended and Restated Plan include officers and other employees of the Company, members of the Board and outside consultants, as specified under the Amended and Restated Plan and designated by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”). Unless earlier terminated by action of theits Board of Directors, the Amended and Restated2004 Plan will remain in effect until such time as no stock remains available for delivery under the Amended and Restated Plan and the Company has no further rights or obligations under the Amended and Restated2004 Plan with respect to outstanding awards thereunder.

 

Historically, stock options have been granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of grant, expire 10 years from the date they are granted, and generally vested over a one to three-year period for employees and members of the Board of Directors. Upon exercise, new shares will be issued by the Company. The Company granted stock options in 2017 which vest monthly over a one-year period. SARs are generally granted with a grant price equal to the market value of the common stock on the date of grant, vest one-third each year on the anniversary of the date of grant and expire five years from the date of grant. The restricted shares and restricted stock units granted to employees generally have a three-year graded vesting period and are subject to accelerated vesting and forfeiture under certain circumstances. Restricted shares and restricted stock units granted to board members generally have a three-year graded vesting period and are subject to accelerated vesting and forfeiture under certain circumstances.

 19

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

InDuring March of 2017,2018, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, senior executives and members of the Board were granted incentive stock options to purchase an aggregate of 172,077745,600 shares of common stock with a weighted averagean exercise price of $2.13$1.01 per share and 186,400 RSUs, (subject generally to the executive’s or board member’s, as applicable, continued service with the Company), which vest in equal monthly installmentsone-third each year over a period of one year.three years.

 

The following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in determining the fair value of the stock option awards granted during the nine month periodsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017. There were no options granted during the nine month period ended September 30, 2016.

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017
Risk-free interest rate1.85%
Expected life4.93
Expected volatility141.73%
Dividend yield-
  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2018  June 30, 2017 
  (unaudited) 
       
Risk-free interest rate  2.65%  1.96%
Expected life  6.00   4.91 
Expected volatility  126.93%  138.71%
Dividend yield  -   - 

 

The Company recognized approximately $0.3$0.4 million and $0.02$0.1 million of stock-based compensation expense during the threethree-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and approximately $1.0 million and $0.2 million for the six month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively, and approximately $0.5 million and $0.1 million during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In 2017, the Company inadvertently granted 184,647 share options to six employees in excess of the number available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan. These grants were cancelled and replaced with the new awards that were contingent upon stockholder approval which was received in September 2017. The replacement option grants were made on May 10, 2017, with a strike price of $2.46 and will vest in equal monthly installments over one year subject generally to the continued service of the grantees.

In September 2017, subsequent to approval by shareholders, the Company granted 945,000 stock options to members of senior management. These options have an exercise price of a $1.45 and vest in equal monthly installments over one year. Also in September 2017, the Company granted 43,000 stock options to members of the Board of Directors with an exercise price of $1.48.

 

9.INCOME TAXES

 

Generally, accounting standards require companies to provide for income taxes each quarter based on their estimate of the effective tax rate for the full year. The authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes allows use of the discrete method when it provides a better estimate of income tax expense. Due to the Company’s valuation allowance position, it is the Company’s position that the discrete method provides a more accurate estimate of income tax expense and therefore income tax expense for the current quarter has been presented using the discrete method. As the year progresses, the Company refines its estimate based on the facts and circumstances by each tax jurisdiction. The following table summarizes the income tax (benefit) provisionexpense on the loss(loss) income from continuing operations and the effective tax rate for the three- and nine-monthsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017:

 

 20

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2018  2017  2018  2017 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
             
Provision (benefit) from income tax $8  $(301) $14  $(298)
Effective income tax rate  (0.4)%  4.6%  (0.3)%  6.4%

 

Income tax expense for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 was primarily due to minimum state and local taxes.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
(Benefit) provision for income tax $(42) $173  $(340) $(54)
Effective income tax rate  1.2%  2.5%  4.2%  0.4%

Income tax (benefit) provision for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was primarily due to an allocation of tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations.

 

10.SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

Since December 22, 2015, the Company reports its operations as one segment, molecular diagnostics.diagnostics and bioinformatics. The Company’s reporting segment structure is reflective of the way both the Company’s management viewsand chief operating decision maker view the business, makesmake operating decisions and assessesassess performance. This structure allows investors to better understand Company performance, better assess prospects for future cash flows, and make more informed decisions about the Company.

 

The Company’s molecular diagnostics and bioinformatics business focuses on developing and commercializing molecular diagnostic tests, leveraging the latest technology and personalized medicine for better patient diagnosis and management. Through the Company’s molecular diagnostics business, the Company aims to provide physicians and patients with diagnostic options for detecting genetic and other molecular alterations that are associated with gastrointestinal, endocrine and lung cancers, which are principally focused on early detection of patients at high risk of cancer. Customers in the Company’s molecular diagnostics segment consist primarily of physicians, hospitals and clinics. The service offerings throughout the segment have similar long-term average gross margins, contract terms, types of customers and regulatory environments. They are promoted through one centrally managed marketing group and the chief operating decision maker views their results on a combined basis.

 

11.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

The table below presents the significant components of CSO, Group DCA's, Pharmakon'sliabilities classified as discontinued operations relate to Commercial Services and TVG’s results included within Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Netconsist of Taxthe following as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

  June 30, 2018  December 31, 2017 
  (unaudited)    
       
Accounts payable $192  $192 
Other  747   1,110 
Current liabilities from discontinued operations  939   1,302 
Total liabilities $939  $1,302 

12.LONG-TERM DEBT

As more fully described in our Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2018, during the condensed consolidated statementsfirst six months of comprehensive lossfiscal 2017 the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement related to its debt with an investor. The Company exchanged (the “RedPath Debt Exchange”) such then-existing debt for senior convertible notes (“Senior Convertible Notes”) of the three- and nine-months ended September 30,Company on March 22, 2017. Subsequently between March 23, 2017 and 2016.April 18, 2017, the Senior Convertible Notes were converted into 3,795,429 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company recorded a loss of $4.3 million in 2017 as a result of the exchange.

 

The Company has no long-term debt.

 21

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

  Three Months Ending September 30,  Nine Months Ending September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Revenue, net $-  $-  $-  $1,644 
                 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  167   (414)  1,081   (1,006)
Gain on sale of assets  -   -   -   1,326 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, before tax  167   (414)  1,081   320 
Income tax expense (benefit)  96   (117)  509   219 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax $71  $(297) $572  $101 

The assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations relate to the CSO, Group DCA, and TVG businesses and their composition are in the accompanying balance sheets as follows:

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
  CSO  DCA/TVG  Total  CSO  DCA/TVG  Total 
Other $-  $-  $-  $-  $14  $14 
Current assets from discontinued operations  -   -   -   -   14   14 
      Total assets $-  $-  $-  $-  $14  $14 
                         
Accounts payable $304  $-  $304  $890  $-  $890 
Accrued salary and bonus  -   -   -   1,272   -   1,272 
Other  979   -   979   1,966   -   1,966 
Current liabilities from discontinued operations  1,283   -   1,283   4,128   -   4,128 
     Total liabilities $1,283  $-  $1,283  $4,128  $-  $4,128 

 

12.LONG-TERM DEBT

On October 31, 2014, the Company and its subsidiary, Interpace LLC, entered into an agreement to acquire RedPath (the “Transaction”). In connection with the Transaction, the Company entered into a note payable (the “RedPath Note”) requiring eight equal consecutive quarterly installments beginning October 1, 2016.

The obligations of the Company under the RedPath Note were guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries pursuant to a Guarantee and Collateral Agreement (the “Subordinated Guarantee”) in favor of the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Pursuant to the Subordinated Guarantee, the Company and its subsidiaries also granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets, including intellectual property, to secure their obligations to the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate under its Credit Agreement, the fair value of the RedPath Note at the date of issuance was $7.5 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company accreted zero and approximately $0.2 million in interest expense, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company accreted approximately $0.2 million and $0.6 million into interest expense, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the fair value balance of the $9.3 million RedPath Note was approximately $7.9 million and the unamortized discount was $1.4 million. As of June 30, 2017, the Note was fully converted into the Company’s common stock (see below).

 22

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Debt Exchange for RedPath Note

On December 23, 2016 we repaid $1.33 million in principal of the RedPath Note resulting in an outstanding balance of $9.34 million. The balance of the RedPath Note was subsequently acquired by the Investor, for $8.87 million on March 22, 2017. Also on that date we and the Investor exchanged the RedPath Note for a senior secured convertible note (the “Exchanged Convertible Note”) in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million and a senior secured non-convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $3.55 million. On April 18, 2017, we and the Investor exchanged the senior secured non-convertible note for $3.55 million of our senior secured convertible note (the “Senior Secured Convertible Note”). Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the senior secured convertible notes were converted in full for 3,795,429 shares of our common stock. We no longer have any outstanding secured debt, and any security interests and liens related to our former secured debt have been fully released.

In connection with the conversion of the Exchanged Convertible Note, the Company recorded a loss of $4.3 million. Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”) acted as agent in connection with the exchanges into the Exchanged Convertible Note and the Senior Secured Convertible Note. Maxim was paid a cash fee of $0.6 million representing 6.5% of the balance of the $8.85 million exchanged RedPath Note. These costs are directly related to the issuance of the Company’s shares, and as a result are recorded against equity.

In connection with the Exchanged Convertible Note and the Senior Secured Convertible Note, the Company determined there to be an embedded conversion option feature. Accordingly, the embedded conversion option contained in the Exchange Convertible Note was accounted for as a derivative liability at the date of issuance, and shall be adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting date.The fair value of the embedded conversion option derivative was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. On the initial measurement date, the fair value of the embedded conversion option derivative of $208,427 was recorded as a derivative liability and was allocated as a debt discount to the Exchanged Convertible Note. At each conversion date, subsequent to the issuance of the Exchanged Convertible Note, the embedded conversion option derivative liability would be revalued, with any changes to its fair value being recorded to earnings. At March 31, 2017, the Company also revalued the embedded conversion option derivative liability resulting in a loss from the change in fair value, and accordingly. In connection with these revaluations, the Company recorded derivative losses of zero and approximately $0.1 million for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017. The value of the derivative liability as of September 30, 2017 was zero. The Company incurred $0.5 million of debt issuance costs, for investment banking, legal and placement fee services in connection with the Exchange Agreement. These costs were treated as a debt discount and amortized to interest expense over the term of the Exchanged Notes. In connection with the conversion of the Senior Secured Convertible Note on April 18, 2017, the Company recorded a loss of $2.3 million.

 23

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

13.SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

The following table representspresents cash flows used in the Company’s discontinued operations for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017:

 

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations $(2,259) $(1,486)
         
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations $-  $- 

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2018  2017 
  (unaudited) 
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations $(354) $(883)

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

(in thousands)

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2018  2017 
  (unaudited) 
Operating        
Adoption of ASC 606 $2,500  $- 
Prepaid stock grants issued to vendors $286  $- 
         
Investing        
Acquisition of property and equipment in other accrued expenses $46  $- 
         
Financing        
Settlement of the RedPath Note $-  $(8,098)
Issuance of the Exchange Notes $-  $11,375 
Non-cash equity conversion costs $-  $(173)
Debt issuance costs $-  $(511)
Warrants issued through Termination Agreement* $-  $193 
Common shares issued in debt exchange $-  $8,869 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Non Cash Financing Activities
(in thousands) *See Note 14,Equity

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
       
Write-off of the RedPath Note $(8,098) $- 
Issuance of the Exchange Notes $11,375  $- 
Non-cash equity conversion costs $(173) $- 
Debt issuance costs $(511) $- 
Warrants issued through Termination Agreement (See Note 14,Equity) $193  $- 
Shares issued in debt exchange $11,643  $- 
Professional fees paid by a third party $685  $- 

 

14.EQUITY

 

Public Equity Offerings

DuringAs more fully described in our Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2018, during the nine months ended September 30,first quarter of fiscal 2017 the Company closed on four separate equity offerings raisingissued 2,793,000 common shares and 855,000 warrants for gross proceeds amounting to $12.2 million. In addition, as described in Note 12,Long-Term Debt, the Company issued 3,795,429 common shares in connection with the RedPath Debt Exchange and conversion of $27.9 million. The details are as follows:

On January 6, 2017, the Company completed the Second Registered Direct Offering to sell 630,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $6.81 per share to certain institutional investors, which resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4.2 million.
On January 25, 2017, the Company completed the Third Registered Direct Offering to sell 855,000 shares of its common stock and a concurrent private placement of warrants to purchase 855,000 shares of its common stock, or the Warrants, to the same investors participating in the Third Registered Direct Offering. The Warrants and the shares of the Company’s common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants were not registered under the Securities Act and were sold pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares of common stock sold in the Third Registered Direct Offering and the Warrants issued in the concurrent Private Placement were issued separately but sold together at a combined purchase price of $4.69 per share of common stock and accompanying Warrant. The Third Registered Direct Offering and the Private Placement together resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $4 million. The Company also used approximately $1.0 million to satisfy the obligations due to five former senior executives. See Note 6,Commitments and Contingencies. The fair value of these warrants issued was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and amounted to $1.67 million. The warrants do not include any cash settlement provisions and accordingly are not liability classified. As a result, the Company is not required to revalue the warrants at each reporting date. The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the warrants upon issuance:

 24

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

Market Price $4.33 
Exercise Price $4.69 
Risk-free interest rate  1.95%
Expected volatility  124.02%
Expected life in years  5.0 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

On February 8, 2017, the Company completed a CMPO to sell 1,200,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $3.00 per share. In addition, we granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 9% of the total number of shares of common stock sold by us in the CMPO, solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. The CMPO resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $3.9 million.

On March 22, 2017,Senior Convertible Notes. As part of the Debt Exchange, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the RedPath Equityholder Representative. Under the terms of the Termination Agreement, RedPath Equityholder Representative, agreed to terminate allLLC, terminating milestone and royalty payments and milestone rights under the contingent consideration agreement. In exchange for terminating the royalty and milestone right of RedPath, the Company agreed to issue to the RedPath Equityholder Representativeissued 5 year warrants to acquire an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $4.69 per share. The fair value of the warrants issued was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and amounted to $0.19 million. The warrants do not include any cash settlement provisions and accordingly are not liability classified. As a result, the Company is not required to revalue the warrants at each reporting date. The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the warrants upon issuance:

Market Price $2.37 
Exercise Price $4.69 
Risk-free interest rate  1.95%
Expected volatility  125.58%
Expected life in years  5.5 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

 25

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

As partDuring the second quarter of our acquisition of RedPath Integrated Pathology, Inc., we issued the RedPath Note. In December 2016 we repaid $1.33 million in principal of the RedPath Note resulting in an outstanding balance of $9.34 million. The RedPath Note was subsequently acquired by the Investor for $8.87 million on March 22, 2017. Also on that date we and the investor exchanged the RedPath Note for a senior secured convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $5.32 million and a senior secured non-convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $3.55 million. On April 18, 2017, we and the Investor exchanged the senior secured non-convertible note for $3.55 million of our senior secured convertible note. Between March 23, 2017 and April 18, 2017, the senior secured convertible notes were converted in full for 3,795,429 shares of our common stock. We no longer have any outstanding secured debt, and any security interests and liens related to our former secured debt have been or will be released and/or terminated upon the completion of applicable filings.

On June 16, 2017, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Maxim as the representative of several underwriters (the “Underwriters”) named therein with respect to the issuance and sale of an aggregatecompleted a public offering of (i) 9,900,000 shares (“Firm Shares”) of the Company’s common stock (the “Firm Shares”), (ii) Base Warrantswarrants to purchase 12,500,000 shares of common stockCommon Stock at an exercise price equal to $1.25 per share (the “Base Warrants”) and (iii) Pre-Funded Warrantswarrants to purchase 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $0.01 per share in the Offering pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement.(the “Pre-Funded Warrants”). Each Firm Share and accompanying Base Warrant was sold for a combined effective price of $1.10, and each Pre-Funded Warrant and accompanying Base Warrant was sold for a combined effective price of $1.09. The Underwriters were entitled to receive an underwriting discount equal to 7.5%issuance of the offer price of the aggregate number of Firm Shares and the Pre-Funded Warrants soldresulted in the Offering and Over-Allotment and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of $0.1 million. The Company also granted the Underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 Firm Shares and/or 1,875,000 Base Warrants to cover over-allotments, if any (the “Over-Allotment”). Additionally, the Company agreed to issue to the Underwriters warrants (the “Underwriter Warrant”) to purchase a number of Firm Shares of common stock equal to an aggregate of 4% of the total number of shares of Common Stock and Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the Offering.

The Company offered to each purchaser whose purchase of shares of common stock in this Offering would otherwise result in the purchaser, together with its affiliates and certain related parties, beneficially owning more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock immediately following the consummation of this Offering, the opportunity to purchase, if the purchaser so chooses, pre-funded warrants, in lieu of shares of common stock that would otherwise result in the purchaser’s beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% of our outstanding common stock. Subject to limited exceptions, a holder of pre-funded warrants could not have the right to exercise any portion of its pre-funded warrants if the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% (or, at the election of the holder, 9.99%) of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise. Each pre-funded warrant was exercisable for one share of our common stock. The Offering also related to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of any pre-funded warrants sold in the Offering. Each pre-funded warrant was sold together with a common warrant with the same terms as the common warrant described above. The common warrants were exercisable immediately and will expire five years after the date of issuance, or June 22, 2022. The shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants could only be purchased with the accompanying common warrants, but were issued separately, and were immediately separable upon issuance.

 26

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

On June 21, 2017, the Company successfully closed its Offering, See Note 2,Liquidity. A public trading market for the Base Warrants was established on July 5, 2017 on the OTC market under the trading symbol IDGGW. As part of the offering the Underwriters purchased the full over-allotment of 1,875,000 Base Warrants available to them for the specified $.01 per warrant, which are not exercisable for six months after the Offering. The full 2,600,000 of Pre-Funded Warrants were also sold on at the price of $1.09 per warrant. The combined gross proceeds of the Offering totaledoffering totaling $13.7 million, with approximately $12.3 million of net funds available to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and other stock issuance expenses.

In summary, the Company issued 9,900,000 shares of Common Stock as well as Base Warrants, Overallotment Warrants, Pre-Funded Warrants and Underwriters Warrants to purchase 12,500,000, 1,875,000, 2,600,000 and 575,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, respectively. The Pre-Funded and Underwriters Warrants are classified as liabilities because in certain circumstances they could require cash settlement. The Base and Overallotment Warrants do not contain such provisions. As a result, the Company is not required to revalue the Base and Overallotment warrants at each reporting date. The Base Warrants are traded on the OTC market, however, trading volume has been insufficient to determine fair value. The fair value of the Base and Overallotment Warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and amounted to $5.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the Base Warrants and Overallotment Warrants upon issuance:

Market Price $0.87 
Exercise Price $1.25 
Risk-free interest rate  1.75%
Expected volatility  134.21%
Expected life in years  5.0 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

As of July 7, 2017, all of the 2,600,000 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised for $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued. On July 31, the Underwriters exercised their right to purchase 875,000 Firm Shares for $0.960 million net of $0.072 million in underwriter discounts, or $0.882 million.

On July 5, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement for investor relations services. In consideration for these services, the Company paid $0.2 million in cash and agreed to issue a warrant expiring in August 2020, exercisable into 150,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.25.

 27

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)

 

The warrant issuance is considered a share-based payment award issued to a nonemployee in exchange for services and falls within the scope of ASC 505-50. The fair value of the warrant was determined to be $0.2 million and was fully expensed during the quarter ended September 30, 2017.

The following table sets forth the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of the share- based warrant upon issuance:

Market Price $1.62 
Exercise Price $1.25 
Risk-free interest rate  1.66%
Expected volatility  172.29%
Expected life in years  3.1 
Expected dividend yield  0.00%

15.WARRANTS

Warrants outstanding andThere was no warrant activity for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018. Warrants outstanding for the period ended June 30, 2018 are as follows:

 

Description Classification Exercise Price Expiration Date 

Balance

December 31, 2016

  Warrants Issued Warrants Exercised Warrants Cancelled/ Expired  

Balance

September 30, 2017

  Classification Exercise Price  Expiration Date Warrants Issued  Warrants Exercised  Warrants Cancelled/ Expired  

Balance

December 31, 2017

 

Balance

June 30,

2018

 
                              
Private Placement Warrants, issued January 25, 2017 Equity $4.69  June 2022  855,000   -   -   855,000   855,000 
RedPath Warrants, issued March 22, 2017 Equity $4.69  September 2022  100,000   -   -   100,000   100,000 
Pre-Funded Warrants, issued June 21, 2017 Liability $0.01  None  -   2,600,000   (2,600,000)  -   -  Liability $0.01  None  2,600,000   (2,600,000)  -   -   - 
Underwriters Warrants, issued June 21, 2017 Liability $1.32  December 2022  -   575,000   -   (40,000)  535,000  Liability $1.32  December 2022  575,000   -   (40,000)  535,000   535,000 
Private Placement Warrants, issued January 25, 2017 Equity $4.69  June 2022  -   855,000   -   -   855,000 
RedPath Warrants, issued March 22, 2017 Equity $4.69  September 2022  -   100,000   -   -   100,000 
Base & Overallotment Warrants, issued June 21, 2017 Equity $1.25  June 2022  -   14,375,000   (747,800)  -   13,627,200  Equity $1.25  June 2022  14,375,000   (5,672,852)  -   8,702,148   8,702,148 
Vendor Warrants, issued August 6, 2017 Equity $1.25  August 2020 -   150,000   -   -   150,000  Equity $1.25  August 2020  150,000   -   -   150,000   150,000 
Warrants issued October 12, 2017 Equity $1.80  April 2022  3,200,000   -   -   3,200,000   3,200,000 
                                                    
     -   18,655,000   (3,347,800)  (40,000)  15,267,200           21,855,000   (8,272,852)  (40,000)  13,542,148   13,542,148 

 

16.RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

Recently adopted standards

In March 2016,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (”(“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify the accounting and reporting for employee share-based payment transactions.2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” previously defined in Note 3 as “ASC 606”. The pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2016 with early adoption permitted.standard, including subsequently issued amendments, replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The adoptionkey focus of the guidancenew standard is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in ASU No. 2016-09an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this key focus, there is a five-step approach outlined in the first quarterstandard. We adopted this new standard as of 2017 did not have a material impact onJanuary 1, 2018, by using the Company’s consolidated financial statements.modified-retrospective method. See Note 3,Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further details.

 28

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Tabular information in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)New standards not yet adopted

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which when effective will require organizations that lease assets (e.g., through “leases”) to recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by the leases on the balance sheet. A lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with terms that exceed twelve months. The standard will also require disclosures to help investors and financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The standard, including subsequently issued amendments, will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The key focus of the new standard is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this key focus, there is a five-step approach outlined in the standard. Entities are permitted to apply the new standard under the full retrospective method, subject to certain practical expedients, or the modified retrospective method that requires the application of the guidance only to contracts that are uncompleted on the date of initial application. The Company will adopt the new revenue standard and subsequently issued amendments as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.

The Company has formed an implementation team, which includes internal accounting resources and a third party consulting firm, to oversee the adoption of the new standard. The implementation team is performing a detailed review of the Company’s contracts and revenue streams to identify potential differences in accounting as a result of the new standard. The Company continues to assess the impact on its existing revenue accounting policies, newly required financial statement disclosures, and is executing on the project plan. The Company has not yet determined the impact from the adoption of the new standard on either its financial position or results of operations.

17.OTHER SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

Warrant Exercise AgreementNasdaq Correspondence

On May 4, 2018, the Company was notified by NASDAQ that we were no longer in compliance with the minimum bid price requirements of NASDAQ for continued listing and that we had until October 31, 2018 to regain compliance with this requirement or face delisting. On July 30, 2018 NASDAQ notified the Company that effective July 27, 2018 the Company was in compliance with the minimum bid price requirements of NASDAQ and the matter was determined to be closed.

Line of credit

On October 12, 2017,

Effective July 2018, the Company entered into warrant exercise agreements (eachsigned a “Warrant Exercise Agreement”)letter of intent with certain holders (collectively, the “Warrant Holders” and each,Silicon Valley Bank to provide up to a “Warrant Holder”)3-year $4,000,000 line of the Company’s warrants (the “Warrants”) issued in June 2017. Pursuantcredit based on 80% of net available receivables, including a term portion of $850,000 to the Warrant Exercise Agreement, the Warrant Holders agreed to exercise Warrants for an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of common stock, at the Warrant exercise price of $1.25 per share. The Warrants were issued pursuant to that certain warrant agency agreement, dated as of June 21, 2017 (the “Warrant Agency Agreement”), by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent (the “Warrant Agent”). In connection with the exercises, the Company agreed to issue additional warrants to the Warrant Holders for the number of shares of Common Stock that is equal to eighty percent (or 3,200,000 warrants) of the number of shares exercised by such Warrant Holder (the “Additional Warrant Shares”), at an exercise price of $1.80 per share.

support capital expansions.

 

 29

21
 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our plans, objectives, beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “intends,” “projects,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will” or similar words and expressions. These forward-looking statements are contained throughout this Form 10-Q.

 

Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions involving judgments about, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. These predictions are also affected by known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

 our ability to profitably grow our business, including our ability to finance our business on acceptable terms and successfully compete in the market;
   
 our ability to obtain broad adoption of and ability to grow or continue to secure sufficient levels of reimbursement for our molecular diagnostic tests in a changing reimbursement environment;
   
 whether we are able to successfully utilize our operating experience to sell our molecular diagnostic tests;
   
 our limited operating history as a molecular diagnostics company;
   
 our dependence on a concentrated selection of payers for our molecular diagnostic tests;
   
 the demand for our molecular diagnostic tests from physicians and patients;
   
 our reliance on our internal sales forces for business expansion;
   
 our dependence on third parties for the supply of some of the materials used in our molecular diagnostic tests;
   
 our ability to scale our operations, testing capacity and processing technology;
   
 our ability to continue to secure sufficient levels of reimbursement to continue to progress our business;
our ability to compete successfully with companies with greater financial resources;
   
 our ability to obtain sufficient data and samples to cost effectively and timely perform sufficient clinical trials in order to support our current and future products;

 

 30

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 product liability claims against us;
   
 patent infringement claims against us;
   
 our involvement in current and future litigation against us;us or our ability to collect on judgements found in our favor;

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 the effect current and future laws, licensing requirements and regulation have on our business including the changing U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, environment as it relates to molecular diagnostics;diagnosis;
   
  the effect of potential adverse findings resulting from regulatory audits of our billing practices and the impact such results could have on our business;
   
 our exposure to environmental liabilities as a result of our business;
   
 the susceptibility of our information systems to security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions;
   
 our ability to enter into effective electronic data interchange arrangements with our customers;customers and third-party payers;
  ��
 our billing practices and our ability to collect on claims for the sale of our molecular diagnostic tests;
   
 our dependence on a third-party medical billing provider to operate effectively without delays, data loss, or other disruptions;
our ability to attract and retain qualified sales representatives and other key employees and management personnel;
   
 competition in the segment of the molecular diagnostics industry in which we operate or expect to operate;
   
 our ability to obtain additional fundsfunding when necessary, in order to implement our business models and strategies;
   
 the results of any future impairment testing for other intangible assets;
   
 our ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate any future acquisitions and the effects of any such items on our revenues, profitability and ongoing business;
   
 our compliance with our license agreements and our ability to protect and defend our intellectual property rights;
   
 our ability to maintain our listing with The Nasdaq Capital Market;Market (“NASDAQ”);
   
 the effect of material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls;
● the effect of adverse weather conditions, such as hurricanes and floods, on our business;
   
 failure of third-party service providers to perform their obligations to us; and
   
 the volatility of our stock price and fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenues and earnings.earnings;
our ability to obtain and maintain sufficient laboratory space to meet our processing needs as well as our ability to pass regulatory inspections and continue to be certified CLIA laboratories and be CAP certified;
our ability to commercially leverage our bioinformatics data with pharmaceutical and other potential partners in new revenue lines;

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

the ability to obtain or maintain supportive “guidelines” from trade and/or therapeutic related organizations focused on the clinical efficacy and utility of molecular diagnostics in our areas of focus; and
determination that our Advanced Diagnostic Laboratory Tests (ADLTs) have become affected by the pricing provisions of the Processing Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (“PAMA”) which could result in an across the board reduction in our reimbursement rates; and
Our ability to continue to develop and support our partially customized Laboratory Information System(LIMS), which is our automated basis of managing operations, storing data and customer information.

Please see Part I – Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as amended,2017, filed March 23, 2018, as well as other documents we file with the SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) from time-to-time, for other important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our current expectations as expressed in the forward-looking statements discussed in this Form 10-Q. Because of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In addition, these statements speak only as of the date of the report in which they are set forth and, except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

 31

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Company Overview

 

OVERVIEW

We are a fully integrated commercial and bioinformatics company that develops and provides clinically useful molecular diagnostic tests and pathology services. We develop and commercialize molecular diagnostic tests and related first line assays principally focused on early detection of patients at high risk of cancer and leverage the latest technology and personalized medicine for improved patient diagnosis and management. Our tests and services provide mutational analysis of genetic material contained in suspect cysts, nodules and lesions that helps physicians risk-stratify thyroid, pancreatic, and other cancers to better inform treatment decisions. The molecular diagnostic tests we offer enable healthcare providers to avoid unnecessary surgeries and better assess the risk of cancer progression in their patients. We currently have threefour commercialized molecular diagnostic assays in the marketplace for which we are reimbursed by Medicare and multiple private payers: PancraGEN®receiving reimbursement: PancraGEN®, which is a pancreatic cyst and pancreaticobiliary solid lesion molecular test that can aid in pancreatic cyst diagnosis and pancreatic cancerhelps physicians better assess risk assessment utilizingof pancreaticobiliary cancers using our proprietary PathFinder PathFinderTG®platform; ThyGenX®ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) which is an oncogenic mutation panel that helps identify malignant thyroid nodules; and ThyraMIR®, which assesses thyroid nodules for risk of malignancy; and ThyraMIR®, which assessesassess thyroid nodules for risk of malignancy utilizing a proprietary microRNA gene expression assay. We also launched in September 2017 RespriDX ™, which is a molecular test that helps physicians differentiate metastatic or recurrent lung cancer from the presence of a newly formed primary lung cancer. RespriDX™ also utilizes our PathFinderTG® platform to compare the genomic fingerprint of two or more sites of lung cancer. We are also in the process of “soft launching” while we gather additional market data, BarreGEN®BarreGen®, an esophageal cancer risk classifier for Barrett’s Esophagus that also utilizes our PathFinder platform and RespriDX™ for assessing metastatic versus primary lung cancer which was launched in September 2017. RespriDX™ differentiates the local recurrence of cancer versus new primary cancer formation. It compares the mutational fingerprint of two or more sites of lung cancer to determine whether the neoplastic deposits are representative of a recurrence of cancer or a new primary (independent) cancer.PathFinderTG® platform.

 

Our mission is to provide personalized medicine through molecular diagnostics and innovation to advance patient care based on rigorous science. WeOur laboratories are leveraging ourlicensed pursuant to federal law under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (“CLIA”) and are accredited by the College of American Pathologists (“CAP”), and New York State (“NYS”). We are leveraging our licensed and accredited laboratories to develop and commercialize our assays and products. We aim to provide physicians and patients with diagnostic options for detecting geneticgenomic and other molecular mutationsalterations that are associated with gastrointestinal, endocrine, and endocrine cancer.lung cancers. Our customers consist primarily of physicians, hospitals and clinics.

 

The global molecular diagnostics market is estimated to be $6.45$6.5 billion and is a segment within the approximately $60 billion in vitro diagnostics market.market according to statistics from Kalorama Information, publisher of theWorldwide Market for In Vitro Diagnostic Tests. We believe that the molecular diagnostics market offers significant growth and strong patient value given the substantial opportunity it affords to lower healthcare costs by helping to reduce unnecessary surgeries and ensuring the appropriate frequency of monitoring. We are keenly focused on growing our test volumes, securing additional coverage and reimbursement, maintaining and growing our current reimbursement, and supporting revenue growth for our threefour commercialized innovative tests, introducing related first line product and service extensions, as well as expanding our business by developing and promoting synergistic products like BarreGEN®, and RespriDX® in our market.markets. We believe that BarreGen® is a potentially important pipeline product, also built on the PathFinderTG®platform, which we believe is synergistic to our capabilities and potentially is a significant product opportunity in the gastrointestinal market, which is one of the sectors in which we operate.

 

Additional Reimbursement Coverage and Network Availability During 20172018 (to-date)

 

Reimbursement progress is key for any molecular diagnostic company. We werehave been successful to date in 2018 expanding the reimbursement of our products in 2016 and that has continued into 2017.products. Specifically, the most significant progress we have made regarding payers so farto date in 20172018 is as follows:

 

 

 32

In February 2018, we announced that Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, the oldest and largest health plan in New Jersey, covering 3.8 million patients living in the Northeastern United States, has agreed to cover ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and ThyraMIR®for its members effective January 9, 2018.
 
 

In March 2018, we announced coverage of ThyGenX®(now ThyGeNEXT™) and ThyraMIR®by four new Blue Cross Blue Shield Plans: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona, Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Iowa, and Wellmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Dakota. These four plans combined represent over 5 million members.

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 In April 2017,March 2018 we announced that UnitedHealthcare,we had entered into a laboratory services agreement with Acupath Laboratories, Inc. based in Plainview, New York (Long Island) whereby Acupath’s Commercial team will be selling ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and ThyraMIR® as part of its menu for endocrinologists, endocrine surgeons, and other physicians focused on the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer.
In April 2018, we announced that we had entered into an Agreement with BJC Healthcare of St. Louis, Missouri, one of the largest health plannon-profit, integrated healthcare systems in the United States, has agreedStates. The Agreement enables all physicians across the BJC system access to cover our ThyraMIR® test used in assessingboth ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and ThyraMIR® for patients with indeterminate thyroid nodule fine needle aspirate (“FNA”nodules.
In May 2018, we announced that we had entered into an agreement with Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) based in Nashville, TN, one of the largest academic medical centers in the country. The agreement enables all physicians across the Vanderbilt system access to both ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) biopsies.and ThyraMIR® for patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.
In May 2018, we announced that 14 Blue Cross Blue Shield plans across the country have published favorable coverage policies since the beginning of 2018 for ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and ThyraMIR®, the Company’s molecular tests for indeterminate thyroid nodules. The list of plans includes many of the largest Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in the country, including Blue Shield of California and Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, previously announced by us. As a result of these 14 new policies, over 75 million members participating in these plans now have coverage is now in effectfor ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and is subject to members’ specific benefit plan design.ThyraMIR® testing.
   
 In June 2017,2018, we announced that we signed a new national contract with Aetna for ourcoverage of ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and ThyraMIR® molecular tests for indeterminate thyroid nodules. The agreement covers manyThyraMIR® by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Aetna’s products, including commercial and Medicare Advantage plans. The agreement is our first national provider contract with a nationalFlorida, the largest health plan in Florida with over three million members. As of July 2018 there are twenty-seven regional Blue Cross Blue Shield regional payers, who have agreed to provide coverage for ThyGenX® (now ThyGeNEXT™) and means that we will now be part of Aetna’s laboratory network for these services. The agreement went into effect August 15, 2017.ThyraMIR®.
   
 In July 2017,2018, we announced that Cigna, onewe expanded the application of the largest national health plansPancraGEN® beyond pancreatic cysts to include both biliary strictures and solid pancreatic lesions while gaining further Guideline support in the United States, has agreed to cover Interpace’s ThyGenXmarketplace. PancraGEN® is the first and only commercially available integrated molecular pathology test for Cigna’s 15 million members nationwide, with coverage effective immediately. Cigna’s coverage when combined with Aetna, UnitedHealthcare, Medicare and other payers brings the total number of covered lives for ThyGenX® to approximately 275 million patients nationwide.pancreaticobiliary cancers.
   
 In October 2017,July 2018, we also announced that Medicare reimbursementCIGNA, one of the nation’s largest health plan providers, has agreed to cover ThyraMIR®, the first microRNA gene expression classifier for ourthyroid nodules, as medically necessary. This is in addition to its coverage of ThyGenX® molecular test for indeterminate thyroid nodules will increase by 40% starting January 1, 2018. Medicare represents approximately 40% of the Company’s volume for the ThyGenX test., (now ThyGeNEXT™) as previously announced in 2017.

Recent Equity Financings

From January 6, 2017 through September 30, 2017, we completed four public offerings of common stock and a private placement of warrants, which resulted in aggregate gross proceeds to us of approximately $27.9 million. A description of the financings is as follows:

On January 6, 2017, we completed a registered direct public offering, or the Second Registered Direct Offering, to sell 630,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $6.81 per share to certain institutional investors. The Second Registered Direct Offering resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $4.2 million. We are using the net proceeds from the Second Registered Direct Offering for working capital, repayment of indebtedness and general corporate purposes. In addition, we granted each institutional investor who participated in the Second Registered Direct Offering the right, for a period of 15 months following January 6, 2017, or until April 6, 2018, to participate in any public or private offering by us of equity securities, subject to certain exceptions, up to such investor’s pro rata portion of 50% of the securities being offered.
● On January 25, 2017, we completed a registered direct public offering, or the Third Registered Direct Offering, to sell 855,000 shares of our common stock and a concurrent private placement of warrants to purchase 855,000 shares of our common stock, or the Warrants, to the same investors participating in the Third Registered Direct Offering, (the “Private Placement”). The Warrants and the shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants were not registered under the Securities Act and were sold pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares of common stock sold in the Third Registered Direct Offering and the Warrants issued in the concurrent Private Placement were issued separately but sold together at a combined purchase price of $4.69 per share of common stock and accompanying Warrant. The Third Registered Direct Offering and the Private Placement together resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $4 million. We are using the net proceeds from the Third Registered Direct Offering for working capital, repayment of indebtedness and general corporate purposes and also used approximately $1.0 million to satisfy the severance obligations due to five former senior executives.
● On February 8, 2017, we completed an underwritten, confidentially marketed public offering, or the CMPO, to sell 1,200,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $3.00 per share. In addition, we granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 9% of the total number of shares of common stock sold by us in the CMPO, solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any. The underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. The CMPO resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $3.9 million. We are using the proceeds from the CMPO for working capital, repayment of indebtedness and liabilities and for general corporate purposes.

 33

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

On June 21, 2017, pursuant to its S-1 filing of its preliminary prospectus to register shares on May 22, 2017, as amended thereafter, the Company completed a public offering for 9,900,000 shares of common stock together with an equal number of common warrants (the “Base Warrants”), to purchase shares of its common stock (and the shares of common stock that are issuable from time to time upon exercise of the common warrants) for $1.10 per share. Each Base Warrant upon exercise at a price of $1.25 will result in the issuance of one share of common stock to the holder. A public trading market for the Base Warrants was established on July 5, 2017 on the OTC market under the trading symbol IDGGW. As part of the offering (the “Offering”), which closed on June 21, 2017, the related underwriters purchased the full over-allotment of 1,875,000 Base Warrants available to them for the specified $.01 per warrant. 2,600,000 of Pre-Funded Warrants were also sold at the specified $1.09 per warrant. The combined gross proceeds of the Offering totaled $13.7 million with approximately $12.3 million of net funds available to the Company after deducting underwriting discounts and other stock issuance expenses. As of July 7, 2017 all of the 2,600,000 Pre-Funded Warrants were exercised for the $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued. On July 31, the Company and the underwriters closed on the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase an additional 875,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.09 per share for gross proceeds of $0.960 million.

As of July 7, 2017 all of the 2,600,000 Pre-funded Warrants were exercised for the $.01 per warrant exercise price and all 2,600,000 common shares related to the warrants have been issued.

During September 2017 the Company received approximately $0.9 million from the exercise of 747,800 Base Warrants.
Additionally, On October 12, 2017, the Company”), entered into warrant exercise agreements (each a “Warrant Exercise Agreement”) with certain holders (collectively, the “Warrant Holders” and each, a “Warrant Holder”) of the Company’s warrants (the “Warrants”) issued in June 2017. The Warrants were issued pursuant to that certain warrant agency agreement, dated as of June 21, 2017 (the “Warrant Agency Agreement”), by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent (the “Warrant Agent”). Pursuant to the Warrant Exercise Agreement, the Warrant Holders agreed to exercise Warrants for an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share in exchange for additional warrants to the Warrant Holders for the number of shares of Common Stock that is equal to eighty percent of the number of shares exercised by such Warrant Holder (the “Additional Warrant Shares”), at an exercise price of $1.80 per share. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $5,000,000 from the exercise of the Warrants, which will be used for general working capital purposes. The Warrants and Exercised Shares were registered pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-218140).

Recent Notices of NASDAQ Listing Compliance

On July 31, 2017, NASDAQ notified the Company that its common stock failed to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 over the previous 30 consecutive business days as required by the Listing Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market. On August 30, 2017 NASDAQ determined that the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock had been at $1.00 per share or greater for the 10 consecutive business days from August 15 to 28, 2017. Accordingly, NASDAQ has notified the Company that it had regained compliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) and this matter is now closed.

 34

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

On October 6, 2016, NASDAQ notified the Company that it did not comply with the audit committee requirements for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market set forth in Listing Rule 5605(c)(2) (the “Rule”). The Company was granted time to regain compliance until no later than its next annual meeting, which occurred on September 14, 2017. Based on the information regarding the appointment of Dr. Felice Schnoll-Sussman to the Company’s Board of Directors and audit committee, as detailed in our Form 8-K dated September 13, 2017, NASDAQ has notified the Company that it now complies with the Rule and this matter is now closed.

 

DESCRIPTION OF REPORTING SEGMENTS

 

We currently operate under one operating segment, which is our molecular diagnostic business. UntilSince December 22, 2015, prior to the saleCompany reports its operations as one segment, molecular diagnostics and bioinformatics. The Company’s reporting segment structure is reflective of the CSOway both the Company’s management and chief operating decision maker view the business, we operated under two reporting segments: Commercial Servicesmake operating decisions and Interpace Diagnostics. The CSO business is reported as discontinued operations in all periods presented.assess performance. We believe this structure allows investors to better understand Company performance, better assess prospects for future cash flows, and make more informed decisions about the Company.

 

Interpace DiagnosticsRevenue

 

Under current GAAP, we recognizeThe Company’s revenue is generated from the performance of its proprietary tests. The Company’s performance obligation is fulfilled upon completion, review and release of test results and subsequent billing to the third-party payer, hospital or service provider.

Revenue Recognition Prior to the Adoption of ASC 606

Historically, for the time periods through December 2017, the Company recognized revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria arewere met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services have been rendered; the selling price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.

Our revenue is generated using our proprietary tests and related services. Our performance obligation is fulfilled upon the completion, review and release of test results. In conjunction with fulfilling these services, we bill the third-party payer or hospital. We recognize our The Company recognized revenue related to billings for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and hospitalsdirect-bill payers on an accrual basis, net of contractual adjustment, when there was a contract is in place, a reliablepredictable pattern of collectability exists and collectability is reasonably assured.collectability. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between the list prices and the reimbursement rate set by Medicare and Medicare Advantage, the contractual rate or the amounts agreedbilled to with hospitals.direct-bill payers, which approximates the Medicare rate. For certain third-party payers that did not have established contractual reimbursement rates or a predictable pattern of collectability, including commercial insurance carriers and Medicaid, the Company believed that the fee was fixed or determinable and collectability was reasonably assured only upon request of third-party payer notification of payment or when cash is received, and recognized revenue at that time.

 

Until a contract hashad been negotiated with a commercial insurance carrier or governmental program, the services may or may not be covered by these entitiesentities’ existing reimbursement policies. In the absence of an agreement with the patient or other clearly enforceable legal right to demand payment, the related revenue iswas only recognized upon the earlier of payment notification or cash receipt. Accordingly, we recognizerecognized revenue from commercial insurance carriers, government programs, and certain direct-bill healthcare providers without contracts when payment iswas received.

 

Persuasive evidenceRevenue Recognition after the Adoption of an arrangement existsASC 606

Beginning January 1, 2018 under ASC 606, the Company began to recognize revenue for billings less contractual allowances and deliveryestimated uncollectable amounts for all payer groups on the accrual basis based upon a thorough analysis of historical receipts. The net amount derived and used for revenue recognition is deemedreferred to have occurred upon completion, review,as the “net realizable value” or (“NRV”) for the particular test and releasepayer group from which reimbursement is received. This derived NRV will be evaluated quarterly or as needed and then applied to future periods until recalculated.

The Company completed its analysis of the test results at which time we will billASC 606 impact and incorporated further analysis of first quarter 2018 collections from its commercial payer base in finalizing its ASC 606 adjustments. The impact of recording the third-party payer or hospital.cumulative catch-up adjustment under the modified retrospective method was $2.5 million, recorded as an increase to opening retained earnings on January 1, 2018. Prior periods have not been retrospectively adjusted. The assessmentCompany also finalized its analysis of the fixed or determinable nature of the fees charged for diagnostic testing performed,modified internal controls over financial reporting and the collectabilitydisclosures required starting with Form 10-Q for the first quarter of those fees, requires significant judgment by our management. Our management believes that these two criteria have been met when there is contracted reimbursement coverage or a predictable pattern of collectability with individual third-party payers or hospitals and accordingly, recognizes revenue upon delivery of the test results. In the absence of contracted reimbursement coverage or a predictable pattern of collectability, we believe that the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured only upon request of third-party payer notification of payment or when cash is received, and we recognize revenue at that time.

 35

2018.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Cost of services

 

Cost of services consists primarily of the costs associated with operating our laboratories and other costs directly related to our tests. Personnel costs, which constitute the largest portion of cost of services, include all labor related costs, such as salaries, bonuses, fringe benefits and payroll taxes for laboratory personnel. Other direct costs include, but are not limited to, laboratory supplies, certain consulting expenses, and facility expenses.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations data. The trends illustrated in this table may not be indicative of future results.

 

Condensed Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations for the Quarter Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 Compared to the Quarter Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 (in thousands)

 

  Three Months Ended
  September 30,
�� 2017  2017  2016  2016 
             
Revenue, net $4,202   100.0% $3,316   100.0%
Cost of revenue  2,069   49.2%  1,846   55.7%
Gross profit  2,133   50.8%  1,470   44.3%
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing  1,816   43.2%  1,282   38.7%
Research and development  483   11.5%  659   19.9%
General and administrative  2,116   50.4%  2,858   86.2%
Acquisition related amortization expense  813   19.3%  970   29.3%
Asset impairment  -   0.0%  3,363   101.4%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  -   0.0%  (1,174)    
Total operating expenses  5,228   124.4%  8,803   265.5%
                 
Operating loss  (3,095)  -73.7%  (6,488)  -195.7%
Interest expense  (40)  -1.0%  (539)  -16.3%
Other income (loss), net  (294)  -7.0%  4   0.1%
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (3,429)  -81.6%  (7,023)  -211.8%
Benefit for income tax  (42)  -1.0%  173   5.2%
Loss from continuing operations  (3,387)  -80.6%  (7,196)  -217.0%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax  71   1.7%  (297)  -9.0%
Net loss $(3,316)  -78.9% $(7,493)  -226.0%

  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2018  2018  2017  2017 
             
Revenue, net $5,501   100.0% $3,855   100.0%
Cost of revenue  2,247   40.8%  1,879   48.7%
Gross profit  3,254   59.2%  1,976   51.3%
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing  2,095   38.1%  1,555   40.3%
Research and development  518   9.4%  413   10.7%
General and administrative  1,726   31.4%  2,793   72.5%
Acquisition related amortization expense  813   14.8%  813   21.1%
Total operating expenses  5,152   93.7%  5,574   144.6%
                 
Operating loss  (1,898)  -34.5%  (3,598)  -93.3%
Interest expense  -   0.0%  (216)  -5.6%
Loss on extinguishment of debt  -   0.0%  (2,731)  -70.8%
Other income (expense), net  33   0.6%  (8)  -0.2%
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (1,865)  -33.9%  (6,553)  -170.0%
Provision (benefit) for income tax  8   0.1%  (301)  -7.8%
Loss from continuing operations  (1,873)  -34.0%  (6,252)  -162.2%
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  (44)  -0.8%  (54)  -1.4%
Net loss $(1,917)  -34.8% $(6,306)  -163.6%

28

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Revenue, net

 

NetConsolidated revenue for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 increased by $0.9$1.6 million, or 26.7%42.7%, to $4.2$5.5 million, compared to $3.3$3.9 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. This increase was principally attributable to increased test volume and collection volumecommercial coverage for our thyroid tests and the change in revenue recognition under ASC 606 from cash basis to accrual of approximately $0.3 million for ThyraMIR.certain payer groups, as disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements.

 36

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Cost of revenue

 

CostConsolidated cost of revenue for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 increased by $0.2$0.4 million, or 12.1%19.6%. This increase was primarily due to the increase in revenue discussed above. As a percentage of revenue cost of revenue decreased to 49.2%40.8% as compared to 55.7%48.7% in the comparable prior year periodperiod. The decrease as a percentage of revenue can be attributed to efficiencies in the manufacturing process relative to higher test volumes as well as the Company became more efficient in its manufacturing process and average reimbursement increased.timing of purchases.

 

Gross profit

 

Consolidated gross profit for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 increased $0.7$1.3 million, or 45.1%64.7%, to $2.1$3.3 million, compared to gross profit of $1.5$2.0 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. This increase was primarily related to the increase in revenue and improved laboratory cost efficiencies in manufacturing processesrelated to higher test volumes, as discussed above.

 

Sales and marketing expense

 

Sales and marketing expense was $1.8$2.1 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and as a percentage of revenue was 43.2%38.1%. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, sales and marketing expense was $1.3$1.6 million or 38.7%and 40.3% as a percentage of revenue. The increase in sales and marketing expense principally reflects a modest rebuilding ofan increase in salesforce costs as well as increased marketing and certain other costs that had been minimized in 2016 during cost reduction initiatives.spending.

 

Research and development

 

Research and development expense reflects clinical and research costs for supplies, laboratory tests and evaluations, scientific and administrative staff involved in clinical research, statistical research and product development related to new tests, products and programs. These costs were approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and $0.7approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively.2017. As a percentage of revenue they were 11.5%9.4% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 19.9 %10.7% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017.

General and administrative

General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was $1.7 million as compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily attributable to a net decrease in the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) accrual expense of approximately $0.5 million, $0.3 million in warrant issuance costs and $0.2 million in rent and moving expenses that occurred in the second quarter of 2017, with no similar cost in fiscal 2018.

29

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Acquisition related amortization expense

During both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, we recorded amortization expense of approximately $0.8 million in connection with the RedPath and Asuragen acquired intangible assets.

Operating loss

We experienced operating losses of $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease in the operating loss for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily attributable to the increase in revenue and gross profit and the decrease in G&A expenses discussed above.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

We had income tax expense of approximately $8,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and an income tax benefit of approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Income tax expense for 2018 was primarily due to required minimum state and local taxes. The income tax benefit for 2017 was primarily due to allocation of tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations.

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

We had a loss from discontinued operations of approximately $44,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and a loss from discontinued operations of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The loss from discontinued operations for both periods was primarily related to the allocation of income tax expense.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (in thousands)

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2018  2018  2017  2017 
             
Revenue, net $10,310   100.0% $7,325   100.0%
Cost of revenue  4,827   46.8%  3,651   49.8%
Gross profit  5,483   53.2%  3,674   50.2%
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing  4,086   39.6%  2,691   36.7%
Research and development  1,019   9.9%  719   9.8%
General and administrative  3,897   37.8%  4,315   58.9%
Acquisition related amortization expense  1,626   15.8%  1,626   22.2%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  -   0.0%  (5,776)  -78.9%
Total operating expenses  10,628   103.1%  3,575   48.8%
                 
Operating (loss) income  (5,145)  -49.9%  99   1.4%
Interest expense  -   0.0%  (469)  -6.4%
Loss on extinguishment of debt  -   0.0%  (4,278)  -58.4%
Other income (expense), net  144   1.4%  (44)  -0.6%
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (5,001)  -48.5%  (4,692)  -64.1%
Provision (benefit) for income tax  14   0.1%  (298)  -4.1%
Loss from continuing operations  (5,015)  -48.6%  (4,394)  -60.0%
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax  (95)  -0.9%  502   6.9%
Net loss $(5,110)  -49.6% $(3,892)  -53.1%

Revenue, net

Consolidated revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 increased by $3.0 million, or 40.8%, to $10.3 million, compared to $7.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

This increase was principally attributable to increased test volume and commercial coverage for our thyroid tests and the change in revenue recognition under ASC 606 from cash basis to accrual of approximately $0.7 million for certain payer groups, as disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements.

Cost of revenue

Consolidated cost of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 increased by $1.2 million or 32.2% as compared to the same period in 2017. The primary reason for the increase was the increase in test volumes over the prior year. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue decreased to 46.8% as compared to 49.8% in the comparable prior year period due primarily to laboratory cost efficiencies relative to the increase in test volume and related revenues.

Gross profit

Gross profit, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 53.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to 50.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. This increase was also primarily due to laboratory cost efficiencies relative to the increase in test volume and related revenues.

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Sales and marketing expense

Sales and marketing expenses were $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, and as a percentage of revenue was 39.6%. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, sales and marketing expenses were $2.7 million and 36.7% as a percentage of revenue. The increase in sales and marketing expense principally reflect an increase in salesforce costs as well as increased marketing spending.

Research and development

Research and development costs totaled $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and as a percentage of revenue were 9.9%. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 the expense was $0.7 million and as a percentage of revenue was 9.8%. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to an increase in certain costs that are internally allocated to Research and Development, as well as an increase in employee stock compensation costs affiliated with research and development personnel.

 

General and administrative

 

General and administrative expense for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 was $2.1$3.9 million as compared to $2.9$4.3 million for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decreasecomparable reduction in bad debtDOJ settlement expense totaling $1.1 million, partially offset by an increase in employee expenses of approximately $0.3$0.6 million and a non-recurring charge of approximately $0.3 million recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2016.current year.

 

Acquisition related amortization expense

 

During both the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we recorded amortization expense of approximately $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively. This relates to the amortization for RedPath and Asuragen acquired intangible assets. The decrease relates to the impact of certain intangibles being fully written off in 2016. See Asset impairment, below. As a result the amortization expense is reduced going forward.

 37

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Asset impairment

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred an asset impairment charge of approximately $3.4 million for the write-off of a pancreas test and biobank-specimen assets associated with the acquisition of certain assets from Asuragen that were determined to have no future value .$1.6 million.

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

During the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, there was a $1.2$5.8 million reduction in the contingent consideration liability related toas the result of the termination of the contingent consideration agreement with Redpath Equity Holders Representative, LLC, for amounts associated with future royalty payments for the pancreas assetassets acquired from Asuragen.Redpath, as disclosed in Note 14,Equity of the footnotes to the financial statements.

 

Operating loss(loss) income

 

There wasWe experienced an operating loss of $3.1$5.1 million for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018, and an operating lossincome of $0.1 million during the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 of $6.5 million.2017. The decrease in the operating lossincome for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to the asset impairment chargereversal of $3.4 million recorded inour RedPath contingent consideration liability of $5.8 million. Without the threereversal of contingent consideration, the operating income from continuing operations for the six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, as well as the increase in revenue and gross profit discussed above.

2017 would have been an operating loss of $5.7 million.

Benefit

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

We had an income tax benefit of approximately $0.04 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017. We had income tax expense of approximately $0.2$14,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and an income tax benefit of approximately $0.3 million for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016. Both the2017. The income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and the income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to allocation of tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations.

 

Income (loss)(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

We had incomea loss from discontinued operations of $0.1 million for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and a lossincome from discontinued operations of $0.3$0.5 million for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. The income from discontinued operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 was primarily related to the favorable settlement of outstanding obligations. The loss from discontinued operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was primarily related to legacy costs associated with the CSO business.

Condensed Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands)

 38

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

  Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 
  2017  2017  2016  2016 
             
Revenue, net $11,527   100.0% $9,963   100.0%
Cost of revenue  5,719   49.6%  4,866   48.8%
Gross profit  5,808   50.4%  5,097   51.2%
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing  4,507   39.1%  4,186   42.0%
Research and development  1,202   10.4%  1,339   13.4%
General and administrative  6,431   55.8%  7,655   76.8%
Acquisition related amortization expense  2,439   21.2%  2,909   29.2%
Asset impairment  -   0.0%  3,363   33.8%
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (5,776)  -50.1%  (1,174)  -11.8%
Total operating expenses  8,803   76.4%  18,278   183.5%
                 
Operating loss  (2,995)  -26.0%  (13,181)  -132.3%
Interest expense  (433)  -3.8%  (1,601)  -16.1%
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (4,278)  -37.1%  -   0.0%
Other (loss) income, net  (414)  -3.6%  14   0.1%
Loss from continuing operations before tax  (8,120)  -70.4%  (14,768)  -148.2%
Benefit for income tax  (340)  -2.9%  (54)  -0.5%
Loss from continuing operations  (7,780)  -67.5%  (14,714)  -147.7%
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax  572   5.0%  101   1.0%
Net loss $(7,208)  -62.5% $(14,613)  -146.7%

Revenue, net

Net revenue for the ninesix months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $1.5 million, or 15.7%, to $11.5 million, compared to net revenue of $10.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This increase was principally attributable to increased test and collection volume for our thyroid tests and the change from cash basis to accrual for ThyraMIR.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $0.9 million or 17.5% as compared to the same period in 2016. The primary reason for the change was the increase in revenue and the corresponding increase in expenses. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue increased to 49.6% as compared to 48.8% in the comparable prior year period.

Gross profit

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased slightly to 50.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 51.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to an increase in lab supplies expense.

 39

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Sales and marketing expense

Sales and marketing expense was $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and as a percentage of net revenue was 39.1%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, sales and marketing expense was $4.2 million or 42.0% as a percentage of net revenue. The increase in sales and marketing expense principally reflects an increase in employee costs and the decline as a percentage of net revenue is a function of the growth in revenues.

Research and development

Research and development costs totaled $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and as a percentage of net revenue they were 10.4%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 the expense was $1.3 million and as a percentage of net revenue was 13.4%. The decrease as a percentage of net revenue was primarily due to increased revenues.

General and administrative

General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $6.4 million as compared to $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction in severance expense of $2.0 million due to the settlement of severance obligations with former executives in the first quarter of 2017. This decrease was partially offset by the expense associated with our DOJ settlement of $0.9 million, $0.5 million pertains to 2016 and $0.4 million pertains to a potential 2017 liability.

Acquisition related amortization expense

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, we recorded amortization expense of approximately $2.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively related to the amortization for RedPath and Asuragen acquired intangible assets. The decrease relates to the impact of certain intangibles being fully written off in 2016. See Asset impairment, below. As a result the amortization expense is reduced going forward.

Asset impairment

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred an asset impairment charge of approximately $3.4 million for the write-off of a pancreas test and biobank-specimen assets associated with the acquisition of certain assets from Asuragen that were determined to have no future value .

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, there was a $5.8 million reduction in contingent consideration liability related to amounts associated with future royalty payments for the assets acquired from Redpath. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, there was a $1.2 million reduction in contingent consideration liability related to amounts associated with future royalty payments for the pancreas asset acquired from Asuragen.

Operating loss

There was an operating loss from continuing operations of $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and an operating loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 of $13.2 million. The increase in operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was primarily attributable to the reversal of our Redpath contingent consideration liability of $5.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and the asset impairment charge of $3.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

 40

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

Benefit for income taxes

We had an income tax benefit of approximately $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. We had an income tax benefit of approximately $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The income tax benefit for both periods was primarily due to allocation of tax expense between continuing and discontinued operations.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

We had income from discontinued operations of $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and income from discontinued operations of $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 was primarily related to reversals of severance accruals and for 2016 it was primarily related to the gain on sale of $1.3 million related to the final working capital adjustment regarding the sale of the CSO business in December of 2015 partially offset by expenses relating to the winding down of CSO.accruals.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, we had an operating loss of $3.0$5.1 million. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $11.7$10.1 million, total current assets of $19.2 million and current liabilities of $8.3$7.4 million.

 

It is anticipated that we may require additional capital to fund our operations in the future. There is no guarantee that additional capital can be raised to fund our future operations. We intend to meet our capital needs by driving revenue growth, containing costs as well as exploring other options.

We completed four public offerings and a private placementoptions, including the possibility of warrants from January 6, 2017 through September 2017, which resulted in aggregate gross proceedsraising additional debt or equity capital as necessary. There is, however, no guarantee that additional capital can be raised to us of approximately $27.9 million. See “Recent Equity Financings”.

See Note 2, Liquidityin the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the RedPath Note.

On September 28, 2016, the Company and its wholly owned direct and indirect subsidiaries, Interpace LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Corporation, entered into the Credit Agreement with SCM Specialty Finance Opportunities Fund, L.P., or the Lender. Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Lender agreed to provide a revolving loan, or the Loan, to us in the maximum principal amount of $1.2 million. The maturity date of the Loan is September 28, 2018. The Loan bears interest at an annual rate equal to the Prime Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 2.75%, payable in cash monthly in arrears. The interest rate will be increased by 5.0% in the event of a default under the Credit Agreement. We have not yet drawn down on the credit facility. As of September30, 2017, the Company is seeking to renegotiate the terms of the Credit Agreement and had not borrowed any funds under the Credit Agreement.

fund our future operations.

 

During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, net cash used in operating activities was $12.9$5.0 million, of which $10.6$4.6 million was used in continuing operations and $2.3$0.4 million was used in discontinued operations. The main component of cash used in operating activities during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 was athe net loss of $7.2 million, a decrease in accrued payroll of $1.8 million and accounts payable of $2.2 million related to past due obligations from the prior year.$5.1 million. During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, net cash used in operating activities was $6.6$8.6 million, of which $5.1$7.7 million was used in continuing operations and $1.5$0.9 million was used in discontinued operations. The main component of cash used in operating activities during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was oura net loss of $3.9 million, a decrease in accrued payroll of $1.5 million and accounts payable of $1.4 million related to past due obligations from continuing operationsthe prior year. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, there was $0.1 million of $14.7 million.

There was net cash used in investing activities for the nine-months ended September 30, 2017purchase of $29,000.lab and computer equipment. There was no net cash fromused in investing activities in 2016.for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, there was net cash provided from financing activities of $24.0$22.2 million, which resulted from the issuance of common stock in our four direct offerings completed in the first ninesix months of 2017 as well as the subsequent exercise of warrants related to those offerings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, there was no cash provided from financing activities.2017.

 

Inflation

 

We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods presented. On an ongoing basis, we attempt to minimize any effects of inflation on our operating results by controlling operating costs and whenever possible, seeking to insure that billing rates reflect increases in costs due to inflation.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

None.

 

 41

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives including that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible disclosure controls and procedures relative to their costs to implement and maintain.

 

Based on theirthe evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that ourof the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, were not effective atas that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the reasonable assurance level in 2016 during which timeSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the following material weaknesses existed:

We lack a sufficient complement of personnel to appropriately account for, review, and disclose the completeness and accuracy of transactions entered into by the Company.
We lack sufficient qualified resources to ensure the appropriate design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, ineffective monitoring controls related to our accounting and reporting functions around management review were not adequately designed and/or operating effectively and can result in adjustments to our financial statements and disclosures.

Management believes that the material weaknesses noted were due in part to the small size of the staff resulting from staff downsizing and cost containment. As part of our remediation plan in 2017, we have taken steps to improve our financial reporting and have implemented new policies, procedures and controls in addition to hiring competent accounting professionals to review transactions recorded and classifications in the financial statements. Through the hiring of independent consultants we have also received external technical accounting assistance to review the accounting and related disclosures for complex accounting matters when necessary. Accordingly, our Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company have concluded that ourthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were greatly improved in 2017 and wereare effective at the reasonable assurance level as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018.

Reference should be made to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding discussion of the effectiveness of the Company’s controls and procedures.

 

Changes in internal controls

 

During the third quarter ended September 30, 2017 management believes that it has completed its remediation plan to address the material weaknesses that existed at the end of 2016 and through the first and second quarters of 2017. Other than the completion of this remediation plan, thereThere has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 42

 

INTERPACE DIAGNOSTICS GROUP, INC.

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

“Item 3- Legal Proceedings” of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 201723, 2018 includes a discussion of our legal proceedings, as does Note 6,Commitments and Contingencies, to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. During the fiscal quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, there have been no material changes tofrom the legal proceedings disclosed withinin our 2016 Form 10-K, as supplemented and amended within our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017.10-K.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

Not applicable as we are a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

On July 5, 2017,June 13th and 15th, 2018, the Company agreed to issue a warrant to purchase 150,000issued 325,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, to a consultant of the Company, who is an accredited investor, at an exercise price of $1.25common stock in consideration of services to be rendered in respect of two consulting agreements it entered into during the Company in a private placementquarter ended June 30, 2018. The issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.amended, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

None.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit No. Description
1.1 *Underwriting Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2017, by and between Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and Maxim Group LLC, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
4.1*Form of Additional Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2017.
4.2*Warrant Agency Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2017, by and between Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
4.3*Form of Underwriting Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
4.4 *Form of Pre-Funded Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
4.5 *Form of Base Warrant, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 21, 2017.
10.1*Warrant Exercise Agreement, dated October 12, 2017, by and between Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. and certain Warrant Holders, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2017.
10.2 *Form of Amendment and Exchange Agreement, dated April 18, 2017, incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 18, 2017.
10.4*Lease Agreement, dated March 31, 2017, by and between Saddle Lane Realty, LLC and Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc., incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s S-1/A, filed with the SEC on June 13, 2017.
   
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
   
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
   
32.1+ Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.
   
32.2+ Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.
   
101 The following financial information from this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv)(v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 +Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibits be deemed to be incorporated by reference to any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in any such filing.
*previously filed

 

 44

35
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: November 13, 2017August 9, 2018Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc.
 (Registrant)
  
 /s/ Jack E. Stover
 Jack E. Stover
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
  
 /s/ James Early
 James Early
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Thomas Freeburg
Thomas Freeburg
Chief Accounting Officer and
(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 45

36