Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 24, 2017

March 27, 2022

OR

[  ]
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-38250

fat-20220327_g1.jpg

FAT Brands Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware08-2130269
Delaware82-1302696
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

9720 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(310) 402-0600

319-1850

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareFATThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareFATBBThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareFATBPThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Warrants to purchase Class A Common StockFATBWThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [  ]x No [X]

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X]x No [  ]

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer[  ]oAccelerated filer[  ]o
Non-accelerated filer[  ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)xSmaller reporting company[  ]x
Emerging growth company[X]o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [X]

o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [  ]o No [X]

x

As of November 30, 2017,May 2, 2022, there were 10,000,00015,131,597 shares of Class A common stock outstanding

and 1,270,805 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.



FAT BRANDS INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

September 24, 2017

March 27, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1
Balance Sheet1
2
3
4
5
8
23
23
24
24
37
37
37
37
38

2


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)


FAT BRANDS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

  September 24, 2017 
  (Unaudited) 
Assets   
    
Deferred offering costs (Note 2) $224 
     
Trade name  8 
Total assets $232 
     
Liabilities and STOCKholder’s Equity    
Current liabilities    
Accounts payable $31 
     
Total current liabilities  31 
     
Due to parent  201 
     
Total liabilities  232 
     
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)    
     
Stockholder’s equity    
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding  - 
Additional paid-in capital  - 
Retained earnings  - 
     
Total stockholder’s equity  - 
     
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity $232 

March 27, 2022December 26, 2021
Audited
Assets  
Current assets  
Cash$28,973 $56,656 
Restricted cash33,043 24,740 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,328 and $4,016 as of March 27, 2022 and December 26, 2021, respectively17,966 19,555 
Trade and other notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $129 as of both March 27, 2022 and December 26, 2021238 231 
Assets classified as held for sale5,337 5,476 
Other current assets11,647 11,853 
Total current assets97,204 118,511 
Noncurrent restricted cash18,525 18,525 
Notes receivable – noncurrent, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $271, as of both March 27, 2022 and December 26, 20213,431 3,493 
Operating lease right of use assets96,813 98,552 
Goodwill295,343 295,128 
Other intangible assets, net648,888 652,788 
Property and equipment, net81,399 80,501 
Other assets3,205 2,534 
Total assets$1,244,808 $1,270,032 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable$23,495 $27,527 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities42,651 46,295 
Deferred income, current portion2,827 2,636 
Accrued advertising12,312 10,853 
Accrued interest payable12,614 10,678 
Dividend payable on preferred shares1,565 1,574 
Liabilities related to assets classified as held for sale4,647 4,780 
Current portion of operating lease liability14,394 14,341 
Redeemable preferred stock135,000 67,500 
Current portion of long-term debt851 631 
Current portion of acquisition purchase price payable1,197 1,173 
Other10,390 10,500 
Total current liabilities261,943 198,488 
3

Deferred income, net of current portion18,755 17,662 
Deferred income tax liabilities, net16,210 12,921 
Operating lease liability, net of current portion91,576 92,920 
Long-term debt, net of current portion907,068 904,265 
Other liabilities362 976 
Total liabilities1,295,914 1,227,232 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)00
Redeemable preferred stock— 64,455 
Stockholders’ deficit
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,221,471 shares issued and outstanding at March 27, 2022 and December 26, 2021, respectively; liquidation preference $25 per share49,920 55,661 
Class A common stock and Class B common stock and additional paid-in capital as of March 27, 2022: $0.0001 par value per share: 51,600,000 shares authorized (Class A 50,000,000, Class B 1,600,000); 16,402,402 shares issued and outstanding (Class A 15,131,597, Class B 1,270,805). Common stock and additional paid-in capital as of December 26, 2021: $0.0001 par value; 51,600,000 shares authorized; 16,380,552 shares issued and outstanding (Class A 15,109,747, Class B 1,270,805).(24,792)(24,837)
Accumulated deficit(76,234)(52,479)
Total stockholders’ deficit(51,106)(21,655)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit$1,244,808 $1,270,032 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1
4


FAT BRANDS INC.

STATEMENT

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Period fromthousands, except share data)


For the Thirteen Weeks Ended March 21, 2017 (inception) to September 24, 2017

Revenues$-
Expenses-
Income before income tax expense-
Income tax expense-
Net income$-

27, 2022 and March 28, 2021


20222021
Revenue
Royalties$20,898 $4,898 
Restaurant sales58,077 — 
Advertising fees9,361 1,188 
Factory revenues8,179 — 
Franchise fees714 540 
Management fees and other income174 23 
Total revenue97,403 6,649 
Costs and expenses
General and administrative expense31,066 4,926 
Cost of restaurant and factory revenues54,799 — 
Refranchising loss548 427 
Acquisition costs248 15 
Advertising fees10,257 1,192 
Total costs and expenses96,918 6,560 
Income from operations485 89 
Other income (expense), net
Interest expense(19,027)(2,460)
Interest expense related to preferred shares(1,999)(288)
Other income, net1,310 98 
Total other expense, net(19,716)(2,650)
Loss before income tax expense(19,231)(2,561)
Income tax provision (benefit)4,524 (129)
Net loss$(23,755)$(2,432)
Basic and diluted loss per common share$(1.45)$(0.20)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding16,388,471 11,970,505 
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.13 $— 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2
5


FAT BRANDS INC.

STATEMENT

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

(Unaudited)

CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(dollars in thousands except share data)

Period fromthousands)

For the Thirteen Weeks Ended March 21, 2017 (inception) to September 24, 2017

Common Stock

Additional

Paid-In

Retained
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsTotal
Balance at March 21, 2017 (inception)100$-$-$-$-
Net income-----
Balance at September 24, 2017100$-$-$-$-

27, 2022

Common StockPreferred Stock
Class A SharesClass B SharesClass A par valueClass B par valueAdditional
paid-in
capital
Total
Common
Stock
SharesPar
value
Additional
paid-in
capital
Total
Preferred
Stock
Accumulated
deficit
Total
Balance at December 26, 202115,109,747 1,270,805 $$— $(24,839)$(24,837)3,221,471 $— $55,661 $55,661 $(52,479)$(21,655)
Net loss— — — — — — — — — — (23,755)(23,755)
Issuance of common stock through exercise of warrants21,850 — — — 61 61 — — 18 18 — 79 
Share-based compensation— — — — 2,112 2,112 — — — — — 2,112 
Dividends declared on common stock— — — — (2,128)(2,128)— — — — — (2,128)
Dividends declared on Series B preferred stock— — — — — — — — (1,652)(1,652)— (1,652)
Exercise of Series B preferred stock put option— — — — — — — — (4,107)(4,107)— (4,107)
Balance at March 27, 202215,131,597 1,270,805 $$— $(24,794)$(24,792)3,221,471 $— $49,920 $49,920 $(76,234)$(51,106)

For the Thirteen Weeks Ended March 28, 2021
Common StockPreferred Stock
Class A SharesClass B SharesClass A par valueClass B par valueAdditional
paid-in
capital
Total
Common
Stock
SharesPar
value
Additional
paid-in
capital
Total
Preferred
Stock
Accumulated
deficit
Total
Balance at December 27, 202011,926,264 — $$— $(42,776)$(42,775)1,183,272 $— $21,788 $21,788 $(20,896)$(41,883)
Net loss— — — — — — — — — — (2,432)(2,432)
Issuance of common stock through exercise of warrants103,000 — — — 426 426 — — 89 89 — 515 
Share-based compensation— — — — 37 37 — — — — — 37 
Measurement period adjustment in accordance with ASU 2015-16— — — — (1,203)(1,203)— — — — — (1,203)
Dividends declared on Series B preferred stock— — — — — — — — (610)(610)— (610)
Balance at March 28, 202112,029,264$— $$— $(43,516)$(43,515)1,183,272 $— $21,267 $21,267 $(23,328)$(45,576)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3
6


FAT BRANDS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Period from

For the Thirteen Weeks Ended March 21, 2017 (inception) to September 24, 2017

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income$-
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Changes in current operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable31
Total adjustments31
Net cash flows provided by operating activities31
Cash flows from INVESTING activities
Payments for deferred offering costs and trade name(232)
Cash flows used in investing activities(232)
Cash flows from financing activities
Advances from parent201
Cash flows provided by financing activities201
Net increase in cash-
Cash, beginning of period-
Cash, end of period$-

27, 2022 and March 28, 2021

20222021
Cash flows from operating activities  
Net loss$(23,755)$(2,432)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Deferred income taxes3,068 (995)
Depreciation and amortization6,561 398 
Share-based compensation2,112 37 
Change in operating right of use assets1,875 605 
Accretion of loan fees and interest2,634 364 
Accretion of preferred shares— 10 
Accretion of purchase price liability24 24 
Provision for bad debts185 — 
Change in:
Accounts receivable1,404 (258)
Other current assets205 397 
Deferred income1,506 332 
Accounts payable(4,014)59 
Accrued expense(4,181)83 
Accrued advertising1,462 (187)
Accrued interest payable1,936 47 
Dividend payable on preferred shares(9)278 
Other(722)(8)
Total adjustments14,046 1,186 
Net cash used in operating activities(9,709)(1,246)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment(3,770)(573)
Other30 — 
Net cash used in investing activities(3,740)(573)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings, net of issuance costs492 — 
Repayments of borrowings(236)— 
Change in operating lease liabilities(1,424)(353)
Exercise of warrants79 515 
Dividends paid on redeemable preferred stock(1,062)— 
Dividends paid on common shares(2,128)— 
Dividends paid on preferred shares(1,652)(639)
Net cash used in financing activities(5,931)(477)
Net decrease in cash and restricted cash(19,380)(2,296)
7

Cash and restricted cash at beginning of the period99,921 7,211 
Cash and restricted cash at end of the period$80,541 $4,915 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest$14,978 $1,969 
Cash paid for income taxes$210 $211 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

statements

8

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION1. ORGANIZATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

RELATIONSHIPS

Organization and Nature of Business
FAT Brands Inc. (the Company"Company" or "FAT") was formedis a leading multi-brand restaurant company that develops, markets acquires and manages quick-service, fast casual, casual dining and polished casual dining restaurant concepts around the world. As of March 27, 2022, the Company owned 17 restaurant brands: Round Table Pizza, Fatburger, Marble Slab Creamery, Johnny Rockets, Fazoli's, Twin Peaks, Great American Cookies, Hot Dog on a Stick, Buffalo’s Cafe & Express, Hurricane Grill & Wings, Pretzelmaker, Elevation Burger, Native Grill & Wings, Yalla Mediterranean and Ponderosa and Bonanza Steakhouses. As of March 27, 2022, the Company had 2,360 locations. Of this amount, 2,230 stores were franchised, representing approximately 94% of total restaurants.
Each franchising subsidiary licenses the right to use its brand name and provides franchisees with operating procedures and methods of merchandising. Upon signing a franchise agreement, the franchisor is committed to provide training, some supervision and assistance and access to operations manuals. As needed, the franchisor will also provide advice and written materials concerning techniques of managing and operating the restaurants.
The Company's operations have historically been comprised primarily of franchising a growing portfolio of restaurant brands. This growth strategy is centered on expanding the footprint of existing brands and acquiring new brands through a centralized management organization which provides substantially all executive leadership, marketing, training and accounting services. As part of these ongoing franchising efforts, the Company will, from time to time, make opportunistic acquisitions of operating restaurants and may convert them to franchise locations. During the refranchising period, the Company may operate the restaurants and classifies the operational activities as refranchising gains or losses and the assets and associated liabilities as held-for sale. Through recent acquisitions, the Company also operates "company owned" restaurant locations of certain brands.
COVID-19
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a Delaware corporationpandemic, which continues to impact the United States and other countries. As a result, at certain times the Company franchisees temporarily closed some retail locations, modified store operating hours, adopted a “to-go” only operating model or a combination of these actions. These actions have reduced consumer traffic, all resulting in a negative impact to franchisee and Company revenue. While the disruption to our business from the COVID-19 pandemic is currently expected to be temporary, there is still a great deal of uncertainty around the severity and duration of the disruption. We may experience longer-term effects on March 21, 2017 asour business and economic growth and changes in consumer demand in the U.S. and worldwide. The effects of COVID-19 may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity and ability to service our existing debt, particularly if these effects continue in place for a wholly owned subsidiarysignificant amount of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. (“FCCG”). time.
Liquidity
The Company was formedrecognized income from operations of $0.5 million and $0.1 million during the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021, respectively. The Company has a history of net losses and an accumulated deficit of $76.2 million as of March 27, 2022. Additionally, the Company had negative working capital of $164.7 million. Of this amount, $135.0 million represents the current portion of redeemable preferred stock as discussed in Note 12. If the Company does not deliver the applicable cash proceeds at the related due dates, the amount then due will accrue interest until the payment is completed. The Company had $29.0 million of unrestricted cash at March 27, 2022 and plans on the combination of cash generated from operations and cash on hand to be sufficient to cover any working capital requirements for the purpose of completing a public offering and related transactions, and to acquire and continue certain businesses previously conducted by subsidiaries of FCCG. These planned transactions have occurred subsequent tonext twelve months from the effective date of this report. If the Company does not achieve its operating plan, additional forms of financing may be required through the issuance of debt or equity. Although management believes it will have access to financing, no assurances can be given that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation – The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and as a result,include the financial statements reflect that the Company has engaged only in organizational activities from its inception through September 24, 2017.

The accompanying interim financial statementsaccounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Our revenues are derived from 2 sales channels, franchised restaurants and company owned locations, which we operate as 1 reportable segment.

9

The accompanying unaudited andcondensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity withpursuant to the requirementsrules and regulations of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amendedCommission (the “Exchange Act”“SEC”), particularly Rule 10-01 thereof, which governs the presentation of interim financial statements.. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The accompanying interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the disclosures contained in the Company’s Offering Circular filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2017 (the “Offering Circular”). There have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies as described in the Offering Circular.

In the Company’s opinion of the Company, all adjustments comprised of normal recurring accrualsconsidered necessary for the fair presentation of the interimCompany’s results of operations, financial statements,position and cash flows for the periods presented have been included and are of a normal, recurring nature.

Fiscal year – The Company operates on a 52-week calendar and its fiscal year ends on the last Sunday of the calendar year. Consistent with industry practice, the Company measures its stores’ performance based upon 7-day work weeks. Using the 52-week cycle ensures consistent weekly reporting for operations and ensures that each week has the same days since certain days are more profitable than others. The use of this fiscal year means a 53rd week is added to the fiscal year every 5 or 6 years. In a 52-week year, all four quarters are comprised of 13 weeks. In a 53-week year, one extra week is added to the fourth quarter.
Use of estimates in the accompanying financial statements. Operating results for the period from the Company’s inception through September 24, 2017 are not indicativepreparation of the results that may be expected for the remainder of the period ending December 31, 2017.

condensed consolidated financial statementsThe preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosuresdisclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesrevenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

At September 24, 2017, certain Company officers

Financial statement reclassification – Certain account balances from prior periods have been reclassified in these condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current period classifications.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)-Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and directors had indirect majority voting controllater amended the ASU in 2019, as described below. This guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology. Under the new guidance, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity is required to recognize an allowance that reflects its current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the Company.

NOTE 2financial instrument based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10, Financial Instruments - DEFERRED OFFERING COSTS

DuringCredit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates (“ASU 2019-10”). The purpose of this amendment is to create a two-tier rollout of major updates, staggering the effective dates between larger public companies and all other entities. This granted certain classes of companies, including Smaller Reporting Companies (“SRCs”), additional time to implement major FASB standards, including ASU 2016-13. Larger public companies will have an effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. All other entities are permitted to defer adoption of ASU 2016-13, and its related amendments, until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Under the current SEC definitions, the Company meets the definition of an SRC and is adopting the deferral period for ASU 2016-13. The guidance requires a modified retrospective transition approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period from inception through September 24, 2017,of adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Acquisition of Fazoli's

On December 15, 2021, the Company incurred costscompleted the acquisition of Fazoli's for a total cash purchase price of $137.1 million. Founded in connection1988 in Lexington, KY, Fazoli’s is a premium QSR Italian chain priding itself on serving premium quality Italian food, fast, fresh and friendly. Menu offerings include freshly prepared pasta entrees, Submarinos® sandwiches, salads, pizza and desserts – along with its organizationunlimited signature breadsticks.

Acquisition of Native Grill & Wings
On December 15, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of Native Grill & Wings (“Native”) for a total cash purchase price of $20.1 million. Based in Chandler, Arizona, Native Grill & Wings is a family-friendly, polished sports grill with
10

franchised locations throughout Arizona, Illinois, and initial public offeringTexas. Native serves over 20 award-winning wing flavors that guests can order by the individual wing, as well as an extensive menu of pizza, burgers, sandwiches, salads and more.
Acquisition of Twin Peaks
On October 1, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of Twin Peaks Buyer, LLC (“Twin Peaks”) for a total purchase price of $310.3 million. Twin Peaks is the franchisor and operator of a chain of sports lodge themed restaurants.

Acquisition of Global Franchise Group

On July 22, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of LS GFG Holdings Inc. (“GFG”), for a total purchase price of $444.9 million. GFG is a franchisor of 5 quick service restaurant brands (Round Table Pizza, Great American Cookies, Marble Slab Creamery, Pretzelmaker and Hot Dog on a Stick).
Proforma Information

The table below presents the combined proforma revenue and net loss of the Company and Fazoli's, Twin Peaks and GFG (the "Material Acquired Entities") for the thirteen weeks ended March 28, 2021, assuming the acquisitions had occurred on December 28, 2020 (the beginning of the Company’s 2021 fiscal year), pursuant to ASC 805-10-50 (in millions). This proforma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the acquisition of the Material Acquired Entities occurred on this date nor does it purport to predict the results of operations for future periods.

Revenue$78.4 
Net loss$(9.9)


NOTE 4. REFRANCHISING
As part of its ongoing franchising efforts, the Company may, from time to time, make opportunistic acquisitions of operating restaurants in order to convert them to franchise locations or acquire existing franchise locations to resell to another franchisee across all of its brands.
The Company meets all of the criteria requiring that acquired assets used in the operation of certain restaurants be classified as held for sale. As a result, the following assets have been classified as held for sale on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 27, 2022 and December 26, 2021 (in millions):
March 27,
2022
 December 26,
2021
Property, plant and equipment$0.8 $0.8 
Operating lease right of use assets$4.5 $4.7 
Total$5.3 $5.5 
Operating lease liabilities related to the assets classified as held for sale in the amount of $232,000. Of this amount, $8,000$4.6 million and $4.8 million have been classified as current liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 27, 2022 and December 26, 2021, respectively.
Refranchising losses during the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021 were as follows (in millions):
Thirteen Weeks Ended
March 27, 2022March 28, 2021
Restaurant costs and expenses, net of revenue$0.5 $0.4 
11

NOTE 5. NOTES RECEIVABLE
Notes receivable consist of trade notes receivable, the Elevation Buyer Note and the Twin Peaks - Hollywood note. Trade notes receivable are created when a settlement is reached relating to a delinquent franchisee account and the entire balance is not immediately paid. Trade notes receivable generally include personal guarantees from the franchisee. The notes are made for the shortest time frame negotiable and will generally carry an interest rate of 6.0% to 7.5%. Reserve amounts, on the notes, are established based on the likelihood of collection. As of March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021 trade notes receivable totaled $0.5 million, which was payment for internet rightsnet of reserves of $0.4 million.
The Elevation Buyer Note was funded in connection with the purchase of Elevation Burger. The Company loaned $2.3 million in cash to the trade name.Seller under a subordinated promissory note bearing interest at 6.0% per year and maturing in August 2026. This Note is subordinated in right of payment to all indebtedness of the Seller arising under any agreement or instrument to which the Seller or any of its affiliates is a party that evidences indebtedness for borrowed money that is senior in right of payment to the Elevation Buyer Note, whether existing on the effective date of the Elevation Buyer Note or arising thereafter. The fundsbalance owing to the Company under the Elevation Buyer Note may be used by the Company to offset amounts owing to the Seller under the Elevation Note under certain circumstances. As part of the total consideration for these expendituresthe Elevation acquisition, the Elevation Buyer Note was recorded at a carrying value of $1.9 million, which was net of a discount of $0.4 million. As of March 27, 2022 and December 26, 2021, the balance of the Elevation Note was $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, which were provided by an advance from FCCGnet of $201,000discounts of $0.2 million. During the 13 weeks ended March 27, 2022 and accounts payableMarch 28, 2021, the Company recognized $46 thousand and $52 thousand in interest income on the Elevation Buyer Note, respectively.
The Twin Peaks - Hollywood note was funded in connection with the development of a Twin Peaks restaurant. As of March 27, 2022, the amount of $31,000. The deferred offering costs will be netted against the proceedssecured note was $1.5 million.

NOTE 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of the initial public offeringfollowing (in millions):
March 27, 2022December 26, 2021
Real estate$60.5 $60.5 
Equipment26.7 22.9 
87.2 83.4 
Accumulated depreciation(5.8)(2.9)
Property and equipment, net$81.4 $80.5 

12

NOTE 7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Changes in Carrying Value of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (in millions)
Amortizing Intangible AssetsNon-Amortizing Intangible Assets
GoodwillTrademarks
December 26, 2021$175.6 $295.1 $477.2 
Amortization$(3.7)$— $— 
Adjustment to preliminary purchase price$(0.2)$0.2 $— 
March 27, 2022$171.7 $295.3 $477.2 
Gross Carrying Value and Accumulated Amortization of Other Intangible Assets (in millions)
March 27, 2022December 26, 2021
Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Carrying AmountGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Carrying Amount
Amortizing intangible assets
    Franchise agreements$109.2 $(7.9)$101.2 $109.4 $(5.7)$103.7 
    Customer relationships73.9 (3.8)70.1 73.9 (2.4)71.5 
    Other0.4 — 0.4 0.4 — 0.4 
Balance, end of year$183.4 $(11.7)$171.7 $183.6 $(8.0)$175.6 
Non-amortizing intangible assets
Trademarks477.2 477.2 
Total amortizing and non-amortizing intangible assets, net$648.9 $652.8 
The expected future amortization of the Company’s capitalized franchise agreements is as follows (in millions):
Fiscal year:
Remaining 2022$10.9 
202313.7 
202413.4 
202513.2 
202613.2 
Thereafter107.4 
Total$171.7 

NOTE 8. DEFERRED INCOME
Deferred income was as follows (in millions):
March 27,
2022
 December 26,
2021
Deferred franchise fees$20.6 $19.8 
Deferred royalties0.1 0.2 
Deferred vendor incentives0.8 0.4 
Total$21.6 $20.3 
13

NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
The following table presents the Company’s provision (benefit) for income taxes (in millions):
Thirteen Weeks Ended
March 27, 2022March 28, 2021
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$4.5 $(0.1)
Effective tax rate(23.5)%5.0 %
The difference between the statutory tax rate of 21% and the intercompany advance will be repaid at that time.

effective tax rate of (23.5)% in the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 was primarily due to increases in the valuation allowance, nondeductible expenses and the impact of state income taxes.

NOTE 3 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Issuance10. LEASES

The Company recognized lease expense of Common Stock

$4.5 million and $0.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021, respectively.

Operating lease right of use assets and operating lease liabilities relating to the operating leases are as follows (in millions):
March 27,
2022
 December 26,
2021
Right of use assets$96.8 $98.6 
Right of use assets classified as held for sale4.5 4.7 
Total right of use asset$101.3 $103.2 
Operating lease liabilities$106.0 $107.3 
Lease liabilities related to assets held for sale4.6 4.8 
Total operating lease liabilities$110.6 $112.0 
The contractual future maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of March 27, 2022, including anticipated lease extensions, are as follows (in millions):
Fiscal year:
Remainder of 2022$12.5 
202315.9 
202414.7 
202514.3 
202613.2 
Thereafter165.6 
Total lease payments236.2 
Less imputed interest(125.6)
Total$110.6 
14


The current portion of the operating lease liability as of March 27, 2022 was $14.4 million.
Supplemental cash flow information for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 related to leases was as follows (in millions):
Thirteen Weeks Ended
March 27, 2022March 28, 2021
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities: 
Operating cash flows from operating leases$4.3 $0.8 
NOTE 11. DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions):
March 27, 2022December 26, 2021
Final MaturityAnticipated Call DateRateFace ValueBook ValueBook Value
Senior Debt
2021 FB Royalty Securitization4/25/20517/25/20234.75 %$97.1 $95.5 $95.4 
2021 GFG Royalty Securitization7/25/20517/25/20236.00 %209.0 205.9 205.6 
2021 Twin Peaks Securitization7/25/20517/25/20237.00 %150.0 147.0 146.8 
2021 Fazoli's/Native Securitization7/25/20517/25/20236.00 %128.8 123.3 122.8 
Senior Subordinated Debt
2021 FB Royalty Securitization4/25/20517/25/20238.00 %32.4 31.8 31.8 
2021 GFG Royalty Securitization7/25/20517/25/20237.00 %84.0 81.7 81.5 
2021 Twin Peaks Securitization7/25/20517/25/20239.00 %50.0 46.8 46.6 
2021 Fazoli's/Native Securitization7/25/20517/25/20237.00 %25.0 22.9 22.7 
Subordinated Debt
2021 FB Royalty Securitization4/25/20517/25/20239.00 %15.0 14.2 14.1 
2021 GFG Royalty Securitization7/25/20517/25/20239.50 %57.0 52.9 52.6 
2021 Twin Peaks Securitization7/25/20517/25/202310.00 %50.0 44.5 44.2 
2021 Fazoli's/Native Securitization7/25/20517/25/20239.00 %40.0 35.6 35.1 
Total securitized debt938.2 902.0 899.3 
Elevation note7/19/2026N/A6.00 %7.5 5.4 5.6 
Equipment note3/7/2028N/A8.49 %0.5 0.5 — 
Total debt946.2 907.9 904.9 
Current portion of long-term debt— (0.9)(0.6)
Long-term debt$946.2 $907.1 $904.3 
Terms of Outstanding Debt
2021 FAT Royalty Securitization
On October 19, 2017,April 26, 2021, FAT Brands Royalty I, LLC (“FB Royalty”), a special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary of FAT Brands Inc., completed the Company conductedissuance and sale of three tranches of fixed rate secured notes (the “2021 FAT Royalty Securitization
15

Notes”) with a forward split of its common stock, par value $0.0001, which increased shares held by FCCG to 8,000,000 shares. On October 20, 2017, the Company completed its initial public offering and issued 2,000,000 additional shares of its common stock at an offering price of $12.00 per share, for antotal aggregate principal amount of $24,000,000 (the “Offering”).$144.5 million. The net proceeds2021 FB Royalty Securitization Notes are generally secured by a security interest in substantially all the assets of the Offering were approximately $21,200,000 after deducting the selling agent fees of approximately $1,780,800FB Royalty and Offering expenses of approximately $1,019,200. The shares associated with the Offering constitute 20 percent of the currently outstanding common stock of the Company. The common stock of the Company trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “FAT.”

The Reorganization Transactions

its subsidiaries.

2021 GFG Royalty Securitization
In connection with the acquisition of GFG, on July 22, 2021, FAT Brands GFG Royalty I, LLC ("GFG Royalty"), a special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary of FAT Brands, completed the issuance and sale of three tranches of fixed rate secured notes (the "2021 GFG Royalty Securitization Notes") with a total aggregate principal amount of $350.0 million. Immediately following the closing of the Offering,acquisition of GFG, the Company contributed the franchising subsidiaries of GFG to GFG Royalty, pursuant to a Contribution Agreement. The GFG Securitization Notes are generally secured by a security interest in substantially all the assets of GFG Royalty and its subsidiaries.
2021 Twin Peaks Securitization
In connection with the acquisition of Twin Peaks, on October 1, 2021, the Company completed the issuance and sale in a private offering through its special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary, FAT Brands Twin Peaks I, LLC, of three tranches of fixed rate secured notes (the "Twin Peaks Securitization Notes") with a total aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million. Immediately following transactions,the closing of the acquisition of Twin Peaks, the Company contributed the franchising subsidiaries of Twin Peaks to FAT Brands Twin Peaks I, LLC,, pursuant to a Contribution Agreement. The Twin Peaks Securitization Notes are generally secured by a security interest in substantially all the assets of FAT Brands Twin Peaks I, LLC, and its subsidiaries.
2021 Fazoli's / Native Securitization
In connection with the acquisition of Fazoli's and Native Grill & Wings, on December 15, 2021, the Company completed the issuance and sale in a private offering through its special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary, FAT Brands Fazoli's Native I, LLC, of three tranches of fixed rate secured notes (the "Fazoli's/Native Securitization Notes") with a total aggregate principal amount of $193.8 million. Immediately following the closing of the acquisition of Fazoli's and Native, the Company contributed the franchising subsidiaries of these entities to FAT Brands Fazoli's Native I, LLC, pursuant to a Contribution Agreement. The Fazoli's/Native Securitization Notes are generally secured by a security interest in substantially all the assets of FAT Brands Fazoli's Native I, LLC and its subsidiaries.
Terms and Debt Covenant Compliance
The 2021 FAT Royalty Securitization Notes, the 2021 GFG Royalty Securitization Notes, the 2021 Twin Peaks Securitization Notes and the 2021 Fazoli's/Native Securitization Notes (collectively, the "Securitization Notes") require that the principal (if any) and interest obligations be segregated to ensure appropriate funds are reserved to pay the quarterly principal and interest amounts due. The amount of monthly cash flow that exceeds the required monthly interest reserve is generally remitted to the Company. Interest payments are required to be made on a quarterly basis and, unless repaid on or before July 25, 2023, additional interest equal to 1.0% per annum will accrue on the then outstanding principal balance of each tranche.
The material terms of the Securitization Notes contain covenants which are referredstandard and customary for these types of agreements, including the following financial covenants: (i) debt service coverage ratio, (ii) leverage ratio and (iii) senior leverage ratio. As of March 27, 2022, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
Elevation Note
On June 19, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Elevation Burger. A portion of the purchase price included the issuance to collectively as the “Reorganization Transactions”:

EffectiveSeller of a convertible subordinated promissory note (the “Elevation Note”) with a principal amount of $7.5 million, bearing interest at 6.0% per year and maturing in July 2026. The Elevation Note is convertible under certain circumstances into shares of the Company’s common stock at $12.00 per share. The annualized effective interest rate for the Elevation Note during the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 was 11.4%.

The Elevation Note is a general unsecured obligation of Company and is subordinated in right of payment to all senior indebtedness of the Company.
Equipment Note
16

On March 8, 2022, an indirect subsidiary of the Company entered into a $0.5 million equipment financing note, the proceeds of which will be used to purchase certain equipment for a new Twin Peaks restaurant (the "Equipment Note"). The Equipment Note has a maturity date of March 7, 2028 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.49% per annum. The Equipment Note is secured by certain restaurant equipment.
NOTE 12. SERIES B CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK
GFG Preferred Stock Consideration
On July 22, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of GFG. A portion of the consideration paid included 3,089,245 newly issued shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock (the "GFG Preferred Stock Consideration"). Additionally, on July 22, 2021, the Company entered into a Put/Call Agreement with the GFG sellers, pursuant to which the Company may purchase, or the GFG sellers may require the Company to purchase the GFG Preferred Stock Consideration for $67.5 million plus any accrued but unpaid dividends on or before August 20, 2022 (extended from the original date of April 22, 2022), subject to the other provisions of the Put/Call Agreement. On March 22, 2022, the Company received a put notice on the GFG Preferred Stock Consideration and reclassified the GFG Preferred Stock Consideration to current liabilities on its condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Twin Peaks Preferred Stock Consideration

On October 20, 2017, FCCG contributed two1, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of its operating subsidiaries, Fatburger North America Inc. (“Fatburger”Twin Peaks. A portion of the consideration paid included 2,847,393 shares of the Company’s Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock (the "Twin Peaks Preferred Stock Consideration").

The Twin Peaks seller agreed to a lock-up period with respect to the Preferred Stock Consideration, during which time the seller may not offer, sell or transfer any interest in these shares. The lock-up provisions restrict sales until March 31, 2022 for 1,793,858 shares (the “Initial Put/Call Shares”) and Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts Inc.September 30, 2022 for the remaining 1,053,535 shares (the “Secondary Put/Call Shares”), (“Buffalo’s”)subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Put/Call Agreement with the seller of Twin Peaks referenced below.

On October 1, 2021, the Company and the Seller entered into a Put/Call Agreement pursuant to which the Company was granted the right to call from the Seller, and the Seller was granted the right to put to the Company, in exchangethe Initial Put/Call Shares at any time until March 31, 2022 for an unsecured promissory note with a principal balancecash payment of $30,000,000, bearing$42.5 million, and the Secondary Put/Call Shares at any time until September 30, 2022 for a cash payment of $25.0 million, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends on such shares. If the Company does not deliver the applicable cash proceeds to the Seller when due, the amounts then due will accrue interest at athe rate of 10.0% per annum and maturing in five years (the “Related Party Debt”). The contribution was consummated pursuant to a Contribution Agreement betweenuntil repayment is completed. On October 7, 2021, the Company received a put notice on the Initial Put/Call Shares and FCCG. Approximately $9,500,000 of the net proceeds fromSecondary Put/Call Shares. The Company has classified the Offering was used to repayTwin Peaks Preferred Stock Consideration as a portion of Related Party Debt owed to FCCG.

FCCG agreed in March 2017 to acquire Homestyle Dining LLC from Metromedia Company andcurrent liability on its affiliate (“Metromedia”) pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, as amended, which provided for a cash purchase price of $10,550,000 to be paid at closing. condensed consolidated balance sheet.

NOTE 13. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Effective October 20,September 30, 2017, the Company provided approximately $10,550,000 of the net proceeds from the Offering to FCCG to consummate the acquisition of Homestyle Dining LLC. In exchange, the Company received full ownership in the Homestyle Dining operating subsidiaries: Ponderosa Franchising Company, Bonanza Restaurant Company, Ponderosa International Development, Inc. and Puerto Rico Ponderosa, Inc. (collectively, “Ponderosa”). These subsidiaries conduct the worldwide franchising of the Ponderosa Steakhouse Restaurants and the Bonanza Steakhouse Restaurants.

Effective October 20, 2017, the Company entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement with FCCG that provides that FCCG will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, file consolidated federal, California and Oregon (and possibly other jurisdictions where revenue is generated, at FCCG’s election) income tax returns with the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company will pay FCCG the amount that its tax liability would have been had it filed a separate return. To the extent the Company’s required payment exceeds its share of the actual combined income tax liability (which may occur, for example, due to the application of FCCG’s net operating loss carryforwards), the Company will be permitted, in the discretion of a committee of its board of directors comprised solely of directors not affiliated with or interested in FCCG, to pay such excess to FCCG by issuing an equivalent amount of its common stock in lieu of cash, valued at the fair market value at the time of the payment. In addition, an inter-company receivable of approximately $13,175,000 due from FCCG to Fatburger and Buffalo’s will be applied first to reduce such excess income tax payment obligation to FCCG under the Tax Sharing Agreement.

On October 20, 2017, the Company granted stock options to purchase 367,500 shares under the 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan to directors and employees, each with an exercise price equal to $12.00 per share and subject to a three-year vesting requirement.

Agreement to Purchase Hurricane Grill & Wings

On November 14, 2017, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase all of the right, title and interest in and to the membership interests of Hurricane AMT, LLC, a Florida limited liability corporation (“Hurricane”) for a purchase price of $12,500,000. Hurricane is the franchisor of Hurricane Grill & Wings and Hurricane BTW Restaurants. The original Hurricane Grill & Wings opened in Fort Pierce, Florida in 1995 and has expanded to over 60 restaurant locations in Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, New York, and Texas.

NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES & OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

Litigation

As of September 24, 2017, the Company was not involved in any adversarial legal proceedings. The subsidiaries acquired on October 20, 2017 are involved in various legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business which management believes will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company.

Liquidity

Following the completion of the Offering, franchising operations will become the major source of liquidity for the Company. Management expects these sources, including the sale of new franchises, to generate adequate cash flow to meet the Company’s liquidity needs for the 2017 fiscal year. As the Company contemplates significant acquisitions, other sources of liquidity will be considered, including borrowings or placements of securities.

Fatburger Debt Covenant

On June 1, 2010, Fatburger and certain of its affiliates became subject to a judgment payable to GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation (GEFFC) for approximately $4,300,000. No proceeds from the original loan had been received by Fatburger, however it is jointly and severally liable as a co-borrower. On October 11, 2011, GEFFC agreed to accept payments in full satisfaction of the obligation totaling approximately $2,600,000 plus interest at 5%. Subsequently, FCCG made payments totaling approximately $2,000,000, plus interest to GEFFC. The borrowers have not made all of the payments required by the settlement agreement. On November 28, 2016, GEFFC sold the debt to an unrelated third party. On June 21, 2017, the debt was purchased by a limited partnership in which Andrew Wiederhorn, the CEO of the Company, is a general partner. Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. has agreed to indemnify FAT Brands Inc. and Subsidiaries from costs and liabilities which may arise from this matter.

Dividends

The Company intends to declare quarterly dividends to holders of common stock. The declaration and payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the sole discretion of the board of directors and may be discontinued at any time. In determining the amount of any future dividends, the board of directors will take into account: (i) the Company’s consolidated financial results, available cash, future cash requirements and capital requirements, (ii) contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions on, and implications of, the payment of dividends to stockholders, (iii) general economic and business conditions, and (iv) any other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. The ability to pay dividends may also be restricted by the terms of any future credit agreement or any future debt or preferred equity securities of the Company or its subsidiaries.

No dividends have been declared or paid as of September 24, 2017.

Franchising operations

The Company is pursuing a growth strategy through developing additional franchising opportunities. Franchise development involves substantial risks that the Company intends to manage; however, it cannot be assured that present or future development will perform in accordance with the Company’s expectations or that any franchising activities will generate the Company’s expected returns on investment. The Company’s inability to expand franchises in accordance with planned expansion or to manage that growth could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and financial condition. In addition, if its franchisees are unsuccessful in obtaining capital sufficient to fund this expansion, the timing of restaurant openings may be delayed and the Company’s operating results may be harmed.

Other

Following the Reorganization Transactions, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various operating leases for office space which expire through April 30, 2020. The leases provide for varying minimum annual rental payments including rent increases and free rent periods. The Company has future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more of approximately $796,000 as of September 24, 2017.

There were no other off balance sheet arrangements in effect during the period from March 21, 2017, (inception) through September 24, 2017.

NOTE 5 – STOCK OPTIONS AND RIGHTS

On October 19, 2017 the Company adopted and approved the 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan“Plan”). The Plan was amended and restated on October 19, 2021. The Plan is a comprehensive incentive compensation plan under which the Company can grant equity-based and other incentive awards to officers, employees and directors of, and consultants and advisers to, FAT Brands Inc. and its subsidiaries. The purpose of the Plan is to help attract, motivate and retain such persons and thereby enhance stockholder value. The Plan allows for management and the board of directors to award stock incentives to substantially all employees as a retention incentive and to ensure that employees’ compensation incentives are aligned with stock price performance. The Plan provides for a maximum of 1,000,0004,000,000 shares available for grant.

As of September 24, 2017, no awards had been granted

The Company has periodically issued stock options under the Plan. (See Note 3 – Subsequent Events)All of the stock options issued by the Company to date have included a vesting period of three years, with one-third of each grant vesting annually. As of March 27, 2022, there were 2,748,436 stock options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $10.56.
The Company recognized share-based compensation expense in the amount of $2.1 million and $37,000, during the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021, respectively. As of March 27, 2022, there remains $11.6 million of related share-based compensation expense relating to non-vested grants, which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period, subject to future forfeitures.
17

NOTE 14. WARRANTS
The Company’s warrant activity for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 was as follows:
 Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
Warrants outstanding at December 26, 20211,707,670 $4.72 3.2
Exercised(21,850)$3.64 3.3
Warrants outstanding at March 27, 20221,685,820 $4.63 2.9
Warrants exercisable at March 27, 20221,685,820 $4.63 2.9
During the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022, 21,850 warrants were exercised in exchange for 21,850 shares of common stock with net proceeds to the Company of $0.1 million.
NOTE 15. DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK
On January 11, 2022, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.13 per share of Class A common stock and Class B common stock, payable on March 1, 2022 to stockholders of record as of February 15, 2022, for a total of $2.1 million.

NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
James Harris and Adam Vignola, derivatively on behalf of FAT Brands, Inc. v. Squire Junger, James Neuhauser, Edward Rensi, Andrew Wiederhorn, Fog Cutter Holdings, LLC and Fog Cutter Capital Group, Inc., and FAT Brands Inc., nominal defendant (Delaware Chancery Court, Case No. 2021-0511)

On June 10, 2021, plaintiffs James Harris and Adam Vignola (“Plaintiffs”), putative stockholders of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative action in the Delaware Court of Chancery nominally on behalf of the Company against the Company’s directors (Squire Junger, James Neuhauser, Edward Rensi and Andrew Wiederhorn (the “Individual Defendants”)), and the Company’s majority stockholders, Fog Cutter Holdings, LLC and Fog Cutter Capital Group, Inc. (collectively with the Individual Defendants, “Defendants”).

Plaintiffs assert claims of breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and waste of corporate assets arising out of the Company’s December 2020 merger with Fog Cutter Capital Group, Inc. On August 5, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint (the “Motion”). Argument on the Motion was heard on February 11, 2022. At the conclusion of the argument, the Court indicated that it would deny the Motion with respect to most claims and most Defendants, but would reserve final decision until after more fully considering the arguments as to the unjust enrichment claim and one of the Individual Defendants. Defendants dispute the allegations of the lawsuit and intend to vigorously defend against the claims. As this matter is still in the early stages and discovery is just underway, we cannot predict the outcome of this lawsuit. This lawsuit does not assert any claims against the Company. However, subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our directors in connection with the lawsuit and any related litigation or settlements amounts, which may be time-consuming, result in significant expense and divert the attention and resources of our management. An unfavorable outcome may exceed coverage provided under our insurance policies, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could harm our reputation.


James Harris and Adam Vignola, derivatively on behalf of FAT Brands, Inc. v. Squire Junger, James Neuhauser, Edward Rensi, Andrew Wiederhorn and Fog Cutter Holdings, LLC, and FAT Brands Inc., nominal defendant (Delaware Chancery Court, Case No. 2022-0254)

On March 17, 2022, plaintiffs James Harris and Adam Vignola (“Plaintiffs”), putative stockholders of the Company, filed a shareholder derivative action in the Delaware Court of Chancery nominally on behalf of the Company against the Company’s directors (Squire Junger, James Neuhauser, Edward Rensi and Andrew Wiederhorn (the “Individual Defendants”)), and the Company’s majority stockholder, Fog Cutter Holdings, LLC (collectively with the Individual Defendants, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs assert claims of breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the Company’s June 2021 recapitalization transaction. As this matter is still in the early stages, we cannot predict the outcome of this lawsuit. This lawsuit does not assert any claims
18

against the Company. However, subject to certain limitations, we are obligated to indemnify our directors in connection with the lawsuit and any related litigation or settlements amounts, which may be time-consuming, result in significant expense and divert the attention and resources of our management. An unfavorable outcome may exceed coverage provided under our insurance policies, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could harm our reputation.

Robert J. Matthews, et al., v. FAT Brands, Inc., Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe, Rebecca Hershinger and Ken Kuick (United States District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 2:22-cv-01820)
On March 18, 2022, plaintiff Robert J. Matthews, a putative investor in the Company, filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company, Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe, Rebecca Hershinger and Ken Kuick, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), alleging that the defendants are responsible for false and misleading statements and omitted material facts in the Company’s reports filed with the SEC under the 1934 Act related to the LA Times story published on February 19, 2022 about the company and its management. The plaintiff alleges that the Company’s public statements wrongfully inflated the trading price of the Company’s common stock, preferred stock and warrants. The plaintiff is seeking to certify the complaint as a class action and is seeking compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial. As this matter is still in the early stages, we cannot predict the outcome of this lawsuit. On April 25, 2022, Kerry Chapman, a putative investor in the Company, filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company, Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe, Rebecca Hershinger and Ken Kuick in the United States District Court for the Central Division of California, asserting substantially the same claims as those made by Matthews in the above-referenced lawsuit.

Government Investigations

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California (the “U.S. Attorney”) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission informed the Company in December 2021 that they have opened investigations relating to the Company and our Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Wiederhorn, and are formally seeking documents and materials concerning, among other things, the Company’s December 2020 merger with Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., transactions between these entities and Mr. Wiederhorn, and compensation, extensions of credit and other benefits or payments received by Mr. Wiederhorn or his family. The Company is cooperating with the government regarding these matters, and we believe that the Company is not currently a target of the U.S. Attorney’s investigation. At this early stage, the Company is not able to reasonably estimate the outcome or duration of the government investigations.
Stratford Holding LLC v. Foot Locker Retail Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Case No. 5:12-cv-772-HE)
In 2012 and 2013, two property owners in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma sued numerous parties, including Foot Locker Retail Inc. and our subsidiary Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. (now known as Fog Cutter Acquisition, LLC), for alleged environmental contamination on their properties, stemming from dry cleaning operations on one of the properties. The property owners seek damages in the range of $12.0 million to $22.0 million. From 2002 to 2008, a former Fog Cutter subsidiary managed a lease portfolio, which included the subject property. Fog Cutter denies any liability, although it did not timely respond to one of the property owners’ complaints and several of the defendants’ cross-complaints and thus is in default. The parties are currently conducting discovery, and the matter is scheduled for trial for October 2022. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, however, reserves have been recorded on the balance sheet relating to this litigation. There can be no assurance that the defendants will be successful in defending against these actions.
SBN FCCG LLC v FCCGI (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BS172606)
SBN FCCG LLC (“SBN”) filed a complaint against Fog Cutter Capital Group, Inc. (“FCCG”) in New York state court for an indemnification claim (the “NY case”) stemming from an earlier lawsuit in Georgia regarding a certain lease portfolio formerly managed by a former FCCG subsidiary. In February 2018, SBN obtained a final judgment in the NY case for a total of $0.7 million, which included $0.2 million in interest dating back to March 2012. SBN then obtained a sister state judgment in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BS172606 (the “California case”), which included the $0.7 million judgment from the NY case, plus additional statutory interest and fees, for a total judgment of $0.7 million. In May 2018, SBN filed a cost memo, requesting an additional $12,411 in interest to be added to the judgment in the California case, for a total of $0.7 million. In May 2019, the parties agreed to settle the matter for $0.6 million, which required the immediate payment of $0.1 million, and the balance to be paid in August 2019. FCCG wired $0.1 million to SBN in May 2019, but has not yet paid the remaining balance of $0.5 million. The parties have not entered into a formal settlement agreement, and they have not yet discussed the terms for the payment of the remaining balance.
The Company is involved in other claims and legal proceedings from time-to-time that arise in the ordinary course of business, including those involving the Company’s franchisees. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these
19

actions will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. As of March 27, 2022, the Company had accrued an aggregate of $5.1 million for the specific matters mentioned above and claims and legal proceedings involving franchisees as of that date.
NOTE 17. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND MAJOR FRANCHISEES
Revenue by geographic area was as follows (in millions):
 Thirteen Weeks Ended
March 27, 2022March 28, 2021
United States$95.4 $4.8 
Other countries2.0 1.8 
Total revenue$97.4 $6.6 
Revenue is shown based on the geographic location of our franchisees’ restaurants. All assets are located in the United States.
During the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021, no individual franchisee accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue.
NOTE 18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated all events and transactions that occurred subsequent to March 27, 2022 through the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements. During this period, the Company did not have any significant subsequent events.


20

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021, as applicable. Certain statements contained hereinmade or incorporated by reference in this report and certain statements contained in futureour other filings by the Company with the SEC may not be based on historical factsSecurities and are “Forward-Looking Statements”Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in statements made by or with the approval of authorized personnel constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Allamended, or the Exchange Act, and are subject to the safe harbor created thereby. Forward-looking statements reflect intent, belief, current expectations, estimates or projections about, among other thanthings, our industry, management’s beliefs and future events and financial trends affecting us. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “will” and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of historical facts containedfuture events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to, COVID-19. These differences can arise as a result of the risks described in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2022 “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Qreport, as well as other factors that may be forward-looking statements. Statements regardingaffect our futurebusiness, results of operations, andor financial position, business strategycondition. Forward-looking statements in this report speak only as of the date hereof, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, including, among others, statements regarding the Reorganization Transactions, expected new franchisees, brands, store openings and future capital expenditures are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements in documents incorporated by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “targets,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

our inability to manage our growth;
the actions of our franchisees;
our inability to maintain good relationships with our franchisees;
our inability to successfully add franchisees, brands and new stores, and timely develop and expand our operations;
our inability to protect our brands and reputation;
our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property;
success of our advertising and marketing campaigns;
our inability to protect against security breaches of confidential guest information;
our business model being susceptible to litigation;
competition from other restaurants;
shortages or interruptions in the supply or delivery of food products;
our vulnerability to increased food commodity costs;
our failure to prevent food safety and food-borne illness incidents;
changes in consumer tastes and nutritional and dietary trends;
our dependence on key executive management;
our inability to identify qualified individuals for our workforce;
our vulnerability to labor costs;
our inability to comply with governmental regulation;
violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery and anti-kickback laws;
our inability to maintain sufficient levels of cash flow, or access to capital, to meet growth expectations; and
FCCG’s control of us.

These forward-looking statementsreference speak only as of the date of this Form 10 Q. Except as may bethose documents. Unless otherwise required by law, the Company does notwe undertake and specifically disclaims anyno obligation to publicly releaseupdate or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements contained in this report will, in fact, transpire.

COVID-19
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the United States and other countries. As a result, Company franchisees temporarily closed some retail locations, reduced or modified store operating hours, adopted a “to-go” only operating model, or a combination these actions. These actions reduced consumer traffic, all resulting in a negative impact to Company revenue. While the disruption to our business from the COVID-19 pandemic is currently expected to be temporary, there is a great deal of uncertainty around the severity and duration of the disruption, and also the longer-term effects on our business and economic growth and consumer demand in the U.S. and worldwide. The effects of COVID-19 may materially adversely affect our business, results of any revisionsoperations, liquidity and ability to service our existing debt, particularly if these effects continue in place for a significant amount of time. If additional information becomes available regarding the potential impact and the duration of the negative financial effects of the current pandemic, the Company may determine that additional impairment adjustment to the recorded value of trademarks, goodwill and other intangible assets may be made to any Forward-Looking Statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of FAT Brands Inc. and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing. References in this filing to “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to FAT Brands Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.

necessary.

Executive Overview

Business overview

FAT Brands Inc. is a leading multi-brand restaurant franchising company that develops, markets, and acquires predominantlyprimarily quick-service, fast casual and casual dining concepts restaurant concepts around the world. As of March 27, 2022, the Company owned seventeen restaurant brands: Round Table Pizza, Fatburger, Marble Slab Creamery, Johnny Rockets, Fazoli's, Twin Peaks, Great American Cookies, Hot Dog on a franchisor, weStick, Buffalo’s Cafe & Express, Hurricane Grill & Wings, Pretzelmaker, Elevation Burger, Native Grill & Wings, Yalla Mediterranean and Ponderosa and Bonanza Steakhouses. As of March 27, 2022, the Company had 2,360 locations. Of this amount, 2,230 stores were franchised, representing approximately 94% of total restaurants.

We generally do not own or operate restaurant locations, but rather generate revenue by charging franchisees an initial franchise fee as well as ongoing royalties. Since it requires relatively small investments in tangible assets, thisThis asset light franchisor model provides the opportunity for strong profit margins and an attractive free cash flow profile while minimizing restaurant operating company risk, such as long-term real estate commitments or capital investments. Our scalable management platform enables us to add new stores and restaurant concepts to our portfolio with minimal incremental corporate overhead cost, while taking advantage of significant corporate overhead synergies. The acquisition of additional brands and restaurant concepts as well as expansion of our existing brands are key elements of our growth strategy.

FAT Brands Inc. was formed on March

21 2017

Our revenues are derived primarily from two sales channels, franchised restaurants and company owned restaurants, which we operate as a wholly owned subsidiaryone segment. The primary sources of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. (“FCCG”). As described in more detail below, in connection withrevenues are the sale of food and beverages at our initial public offering, two other subsidiaries of FCCG, Fatburger North America, Inc. (“Fatburger”) and Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts, Inc. (“Buffalo’s”) were contributed to us by FCCG as operating subsidiaries on October 20, 2017. Fatburger and Buffalo’s were historically under a cost-sharing and reimbursement arrangement with FCCG. After the transfer of these entities to our control, the cost-sharing and reimbursement arrangement with FCCG was terminated and all employees were moved to FAT Brands Inc. or our subsidiaries as appropriate. The historical financial statements are expected to be consistent with the new FAT Brands Inc. entity, in that reimbursement expense and direct employee costs both appear under general and administrative expenses and are expected to be materially the same amounts going forward.

In March 2017, FCCG agreed to acquire Homestyle Dining LLC from Metromedia Company and its affiliate (“Metromedia”) pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, as amended, which provided for a cash purchase price of $10,550,000 to be paid at closing. Effective October 20, 2017, we provided approximately $10,550,000 of the net proceeds from the Offering to FCCG to consummate the acquisition of Homestyle Dining LLC. In exchange, we received full ownership in the Homestyle Dining operating subsidiaries: Ponderosa Franchising Company, Bonanza Restaurant Company, Ponderosa International Development, Inc. and Puerto Rico Ponderosa, Inc. (collectively, “Ponderosa”). These subsidiaries conduct the worldwide franchising of the Ponderosa Steakhouse Restaurantscompany restaurants and the Bonanza Steakhouse Restaurants.

We intend to acquire additional restaurant franchising concepts that will allow us to offer additionalcollection of royalties, franchise fees and advertising revenue from sales of food categories and expandbeverages at our geographic footprint.

Asfranchised restaurants.

Results of October 20, 2017, we operate the Fatburger, Buffalo’s and Ponderosa restaurant concepts with 292 total locations across 25 states and 19 countries. While our existing footprint covers 18 countries in which we have franchised restaurants open and operational as of October 20, 2017, our overall footprint (including development agreements for proposed stores in new markets and nine countries where our brands previously had a presence that we intend to resell to new franchisees) covers 27 countries. For each of our current restaurant brands and those that we will seek to acquire, the ability to expand the overall concept footprint, both domestically and internationally, is of critical importance and a primary acquisition evaluation criterion. We believe that our restaurant concepts have meaningful growth potential and appeal to a broad base of consumers globally.

Operations

We operate on a 52-week or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday of the calendar year. In a 52-week fiscal year, each quarter contains 13 weeks of operations; inoperations. In a 53-week fiscal year, each of the first, second and third quarters includes 13 weeks of operations and the fourth quarter includes 14 weeks of operations, which may cause our revenue, expenses and other results of operations to be higher due to an additional week of operations.

Operating segments

Effective with our initial public offering and the acquisitions that followed, our operating segments are:

(i)The Fatburger Franchise Division which includes our worldwide operations of the Fatburger concept.
(ii)The Buffalo’s Franchise Division which includes our worldwide operations of the Buffalo’s Café and Buffalo’s Express concepts.
(iii)The Ponderosa Franchise Division which includes our worldwide operations of the Bonanza and Ponderosa Steakhouse concepts.

Key Performance Indicators

To evaluate the performance of our business, we utilize a variety of financial and performance measures, which are typically calculated on a system-wide basis. These key measures include new store openings, average unit volumes and same-store sales growth in addition to the general income statement line items such as revenues, general and administrative expenses, income before income tax expense and net income.

New store openings -The number of new store openings reflects the number of stores opened during a particular reporting period. The total number of new stores per year and the timing of stores openings has, and will continue to have, an impact on our results.

Average unit volumes -Average Unit Volumes for any 12-month period consist of the average sales of all stores over that period that have been open a full year. Average unit volumes are calculated by dividing total sales from all stores open a full year by the number of stores open during that period. The measurement of AUVs allows us to assess changes in guest traffic and per transaction patterns at our stores.

9

Same-store sales growth -Same-store sales growth reflects the change in year-over-year sales for the comparable store base, which we define as the number of stores open for at least one full fiscal year. Given our focused marketing efforts and public excitement surrounding each opening, new stores often experience an initial start-up period with considerably higher than average sales volumes, which subsequently decrease to stabilized levels after three to six months. Thus, we do not include stores in the comparable store base until they have been open for at least one full fiscal year. We expect that this trend will continue for the foreseeable future as we continue to open and expand into new markets.

Subsequent Events

Issuance of Common Stock

On October 19, 2017, the Company conducted a forward split of its common stock, par value $0.0001, which increased shares held by FCCG to 8,000,000 shares. On October 20, 2017, the Company completed its initial public offering and issued 2,000,000 additional shares of its common stock at an offering price of $12.00 per share, for an aggregate amount of $24,000,000 (the “Offering”). The net proceeds of the Offering were approximately $21,200,000 after deducting the selling agent fees of approximately $1,780,800 and Offering expenses of approximately $1,019,200. Details of the Offering are described in our Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A, and are incorporated herein by this reference. Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “FAT.”

The Reorganization Transactions

Subsequent to the closing of the Offering, we completed the following transactions, which are referred to collectively as the “Reorganization Transactions”:

Effective October 20, 2017, FCCG contributed two of its operating subsidiaries, Fatburger North America Inc. and Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts Inc., to us in exchange for an unsecured promissory note with a principal balance of $30,000,000, bearing interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, and maturing in five years (referred to as the “Related Party Debt”). The contribution was consummated pursuant to a Contribution Agreement between us and FCCG. Approximately $9,500,000 of the net proceeds from the Offering was used to repay a portion of Related Party Debt owed to FCCG.

In March 2017, FCCG agreed to acquire Homestyle Dining LLC from Metromedia pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, as amended, which provided for a cash purchase price of $10,550,000 to be paid at closing. Effective October 20, 2017, we provided approximately $10,550,000 of the net proceeds from the Offering to FCCG to consummate the acquisition of Homestyle Dining LLC. In exchange, we received full ownership in Ponderosa, which conduct the worldwide franchising of the Ponderosa Steakhouse Restaurants and the Bonanza Steakhouse Restaurants.

Effective October 20, 2017, we entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement with FCCG that provides that FCCG will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, file consolidated federal, California and Oregon (and possibly other jurisdictions where revenue is generated, at FCCG’s election) income tax returns with us and our subsidiaries. We will pay to FCCG the amount that our tax liability would have been had we filed a separate return. To the extent our required payment exceeds our share of the actual combined income tax liability (which may occur, for example, due to the application of FCCG’s net operating loss carryforwards), we will be permitted, in the discretion of a committee of our board of directors comprised solely of directors not affiliated with or interested in FCCG, to pay such excess to FCCG by issuing an equivalent amount of our common stock in lieu of cash, valued at the fair market value at the time of such payment. In addition, our inter-company receivable of approximately $13,175,000 due from FCCG to Fatburger and Buffalo’s will be applied first to reduce such excess income tax payment obligation to FCCG under the Tax Sharing Agreement.

On October 20, 2017, the Company granted stock options for 367,500 shares under the 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan to directors and employees, each with an exercise price equal to $12.00 per share and subject to a three-year vesting requirement.

Agreement to purchase Hurricane Grill & Wings

On November 14, 2017, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase the membership interests of Hurricane AMT, LLC, a Florida limited liability corporation (“Hurricane”), for a purchase price of $12,500,000. Hurricane is the franchisor of Hurricane Grill & Wings and Hurricane BTW Restaurants. The original Hurricane Grill & Wings opened in Fort Pierce, Florida in 1995 and has expanded to over 60 restaurant locations in Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, New York, and Texas.

10

Results of Operations

Prior to the closing of the Reorganizing Transactions, in which we became the parent company for Fatburger and Buffalo’s, we were under common control with these companies as subsidiaries of FCCG. FAT Brands Inc.

The following unaudited information presents the combined operating results of Fatburger and Buffalo’s for the 39 weeks and the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016, respectively.

The following tablestable summarize key components of our condensed consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated:

thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021.

(In thousands)

  39 weeks ended September 24, 2017  39 weeks ended September 25, 2016 
  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Combined  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Combined 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Statement of operations data:                  
                   
Revenues                        
Royalties $3,580  $920  $4,500  $3,540  $1,021  $4,561 
Franchise fees  1,683   430   2,113   3,128   255   3,383 
Management fee  47   -   47   59   -   59 
Total revenues  5,310   1,350   6,660   6,727   1,276   8,003 
                         
General and administrative expenses  1,852   503   2,355   2,365   491   2,856 
                         
Income from operations  3,458   847   4,305   4,362   785   5,147 
                         
Other income (expense)  (23)  -   (23)  (32)  36   4 
                         
Income before income tax expense  3,435   847   4,282   4,330   821   5,151 
                         
Income tax expense  1,264   277   1,541   1,613   269   1,882 
                         
Net income $2,171  $570  $2,741  $2,717  $552  $3,269 

(In thousands)

  13 weeks ended September 24, 2017  13 weeks ended September 25, 2016 
  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Combined  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Combined 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Statement of operations data:                        
                         
Revenues                        
Royalties $1,205  $308  $1,513  $1,162  $328  $1,490 
Franchise fees  529   325   854   1,453   -   1,453 
Management fee  17   -   17   14   -   14 
Total revenues  1,751   633   2,384   2,629   328   2,957 
                         
General and administrative expenses  552   187   739   755   125   880 
                         
Income from operations  1,199   446   1,645   1,874   203   2,077 
                         
Other income (expense)  (27)  -   (27)  3   -   3 
                         
Income before income tax expense  1,172   446   1,618   1,877   203   2,080 
                         
Income tax expense  444   142   586   673   66   739 
                         
Net income $728  $304  $1,032  $1,204  $137  $1,341 

Results

 Thirteen Weeks Ended
 March 27, 2022 March 28, 2021
Statements of operations data:
Revenue
Royalties$20,898 $4,898 
Restaurant sales58,077 — 
Advertising fees9,361 1,188 
Factory revenues8,179 — 
Franchise fees714 540 
Management fees and other income174 23 
Total revenue97,403 6,649 
Costs and expenses  
General and administrative expense31,066 4,926 
Cost of restaurant and factory revenues54,799 — 
Refranchising loss548 427 
Acquisition costs248 15 
Advertising fees10,257 1,192 
Total costs and expenses96,918 6,560 
Income from operations485 89 
Total other expense, net(19,716)(2,650)
Loss before income tax expense(19,231)(2,561)
Income tax provision (benefit)4,524 (129)
Net loss$(23,755)$(2,432)
22

For the 39 Weeks Ended September 24, 2017, as Compared to the 39 Weeks Ended September 25, 2016

Net Income- Net income of Fatburger for the 39thirteen weeks ended September 24, 2017 decreased by $546,000March 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021:

Revenue - Revenue consists of royalties, franchise fees, advertising fees, restaurant sales, factory revenue and other revenue. Total revenue increased $90.8 million, or 20.1%1,365%, in the first quarter of 2022, to $2,171,000$97.4 million compared to $2,717,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower recognized franchise fees$6.6 million in the amountsame period of $1,445,000, partially offset by a reduction2021. The increase reflects revenue from the acquisition of GFG in July 2021, the acquisition of Twin Peaks in October 2021, the acquisition of Fazoli's in December 2021 and the acquisition of Native in December 2021 (collectively, the "2021 Acquisitions") and the continuing recovery from the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on royalties from restaurant sales.
Costs and Expenses – Costs and expenses consist of general and administrative costs, cost of restaurant and factory revenues, net refranchising (gains) losses and advertising expense. Costs and expenses increased $90.4 million, or 1,381%, in the first quarter of $513,000 and a lower provision for income taxes of $349,000.

Revenues- Fatburger’s revenues consist of royalty fees, franchise fees and management fees. Fatburger had revenues of $5,310,000 and $6,727,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016, respectively. The $1,417,000 or 21.1% decrease in revenues from the 39 weeks ended September 25, 20162022 to $96.9 million compared to the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 wassame period in the prior year, primarily driven by a decrease in franchise fees recognized. The recognition of previously collected franchise fees into income can vary significantly from yeardue to year based upon the number of new store openings and other triggering events.

General and Administrative Expenses-2021 Acquisitions.

General and administrative expenses increased $26.1 million, or 531%, in the first quarter of Fatburger consist2022 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily of payroll, consultingdue to the 2021 Acquisitions and increased compensation costs, professional fees and an allocationtravel, reflecting the significant expansion of corporate overhead from FCCG. Generalthe organization.
Cost of restaurant and administrative expensesfactory revenues totaled $54.8 million for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 decreased $513,000 or 21.7%first quarter of 2022 and were exclusively related to $1,852,000, asthe 2021 Acquisitions. These costs relate to the operations of the company owned restaurant locations and the dough factory operated by GFG, which currently sells products exclusively to our brands.
Refranchising losses of $0.5 million and $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2022 and 2021, respectively, were comprised of restaurant operating costs, net of food sales.
Advertising expenses increased $9.1 million in the first quarter of 2022 compared to $2,365,000the prior year period. These expenses vary in relation to the advertising revenue and reflect advertising expenses related to the 2021 Acquisitions and the increase in customer activity as the recovery from COVID continues.
Other Expense, net – Other expense, net for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. Thisfirst quarter of 2022 and 2021 was $19.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively, primarily the resultcomprised of a decrease in allocated corporate overhead from FCCGnet interest expense of $224,000; a reduction in salaries of $220,000;$21.0 million and a reduction in the amount of uncollectable receivables in the amount of $62,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 compared with the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

New Store Openings-For the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017, our Fatburger franchisees opened 14 stores as compared to 4 stores for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

Same-store sales growth-Adjusted same-store sales in our core domestic market (representing approximately 69% of revenues for 2016) grew by positive 7.9% for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017, compared to growth of 0.4% for the for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. Overall Fatburger same-store sales, including international stores in their local currency were positive 1.1% for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017$2.7 million, respectively.

Income Tax Benefit – The effective rate was (23.5)% and negative 5.0% for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. These results reflect the deteriorationfirst quarter of 2022 and 2021, respectively. The difference in macroeconomic conditions in Canada and the Middle Easteffective rate was primarily due to increases in our valuation allowance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund business operations, acquisitions and expansion of franchised restaurant locations and for other general business purposes. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity during the declinefirsts quarter of 2022 consisted of cash on hand at the beginning of the period.
We are involved in oil prices, as well as increased competition internationally.a world-wide expansion of franchise locations, which will require significant liquidity, primarily from our franchisees. If real estate locations of sufficient quality cannot be located and either leased or purchased, the timing of restaurant openings may be delayed. Additionally, if we or our franchisees cannot obtain capital sufficient to fund this expansion, the extent of or timing of restaurant openings may be reduced or delayed.
We also may acquire additional restaurant concepts. These acquisitions typically require capital investments in excess of our normal cash on hand. We would expect that future acquisitions will necessitate financing with additional debt or equity transactions. If we are unable to obtain acceptable financing, our ability to acquire additional restaurant concepts likely would be negatively impacted.
We have liabilities of $135.0 million relating to put options held by others on our Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock due in 2022. The same-store sale results exclude two restaurants which were subject to extraordinary adverse operating conditions in 2015, 2016 and 2017 related to construction blocking direct access or visibilityCompany has contractual options pursuant to the restaurantput/call agreements to extend this repayment via incremental interest payments and political sanctions affectingthere are capital market options that the supply chainCompany may consider. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our liquidity needs and capital resource requirements for at least the related local economy. The Fatburger restaurant on the Las Vegas Strip was affected by extensive construction on Las Vegas Blvd. The Fatburger restaurant located in Doha, Qatar in the Pearl District was affected by extensive constructionnext twelve months primarily through currently available cash and political sanctions affecting the supply chaincash equivalents, cash flows from operations and related local economy. If these restaurants were included the same-store sales data, the change in same-store sales for our core domestic market would be positive 5.4% for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and negative 0.6% for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016, and same-store sales system-wide would be negative 0.4% for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and negative 5.4% for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

For the 13 Weeks Ended September 24, 2017, as Comparedaccess to the 13 Weeks Ended September 25, 2016

Net Income- Net incomecapital markets.

As of FatburgerMarch 27, 2022, we had cash and restricted cash totaling $80.5 million.
23

Comparison of Cash Flows
Our cash and restricted cash balance was $80.5 million as of March 27, 2022, compared to $99.9 million as of December 26, 2021.
The following table summarize key components of our condensed consolidated cash flows for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 decreased by $476,000 or 39.5% to $728,000 compared to $1,204,000 forMarch 27, 2022 and March 28, 2021:
For the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower recognized franchise feesThirteen Weeks Ended
(In millions)
March 27, 2022 March 28, 2021
Net cash used in operating activities$(9.7)$(1.2)
Net cash used in investing activities$(3.8)$(0.6)
Net cash used in financing activities$(5.9)$(0.5)
Net cash flows$(19.4)$(2.3)
Operating Activities
Net cash used in the amount of $924,000, partially offset by a reduction in general and administrative expenses of $203,000 and a lower provision for income taxes of $229,000.

Revenues- Fatburger had revenues of $1,751,000 and $2,629,000 for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016, respectively. The $878,000 or 33.4% decrease in revenues from the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016 to the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 was primarily the result of the decrease in recognized franchise fees.

General and Administrative Expenses- General and administrative expenses for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 decreased $203,000 or 26.9% to $552,000 as compared to $755,000 for the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016. This was primarily the result of a decrease in salary expense of $95,000 and a reduction in the amount of uncollectable receivables of $90,000.

New Store Openings-Forthe 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017, our Fatburger franchisees opened 3 stores as compared to 1 store forthe 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of Fatburger North America

Fatburger funds its operations primarily through franchise fees and royalties.We believe that cash provided by operating activities are adequate to fund our working capital obligations for the next 12 months. However, our ability to continue to meet these requirements and obligations will depend on, among other things, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of revenue and cash flow from operations and our ability to manage costs and working capital successfully.

As of September 24, 2017, Fatburger had current assets of $494,000 comprised primarily of accounts receivables. This compares with current assets of $568,000 as of December 25, 2016.

Fatburger had current liabilities of $4,854,000 comprised of deferred income of $1,877,000; accounts payable of $1,421,000 and accrued expenses of $1,556,000, as of September 24, 2017. This compares with current liabilities of $3,547,000 comprised of deferred income of $1,339,000; accounts payable of $1,070,000; and accrued expenses of $1,138,000 as of December 25, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements of Fatburger North America

Fatburger does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Results of Operations of Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts

For the 39 Weeks Ended September 24, 2017, as Compared to the 39 Weeks Ended September 25, 2016

Net Income – Net income of Buffalo’s for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 increased by $18,000 or 3.3% to $570,000, as compared to $552,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in revenue of $74,000 or 5.8%, which was partially offset by increases in general and administrative expenses of $12,000 or 2.4%; a decrease in other income of $36,000 and an increase in the provision for income taxes of $8,000.

Revenues – Buffalo’s revenues consist of royalty fees and the recognition of franchise fees. Buffalo’s had revenues of $1,350,000 and $1,276,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016, respectively. The increase in revenue of $74,000 is primarily the result of increases in recognized franchise fees in 2017 of $175,000. This increase was partially reduced by lower royalties in 2017 in the amount of $101,000 due primarily to the closure of two long-standing franchise locations in Atlanta, Georgia and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

General and Administrative Expenses –General and administrative expenses of Buffalo’s primarily consist of payroll, consulting fees and an allocation of corporate overhead from FCCG. General and administrative expenses for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 increased by $12,000 or 2.4% to $503,000 as compared to $491,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in the corporate overhead allocation of $13,000 and an increase in consulting fees of $108,000 which was partially offset by decreases in salary and wage expenses of $106,000 for the 2017 period compared with the 2016 period.

New Store Openings –There were no new stores opened by our Buffalo’s Cafe franchisees during the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017, as compared to two new stores opened for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

Same-store Sales Growth –Same-store sales for Buffalo’s Cafe were positive 1% for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and positive 2.8% for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. The softening in positive same-store sales for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 was primarily attributable to adverse weather conditions in the Atlanta area$8.5 million in the first quarter of 2017, which had a negative effect on customer traffic. We excluded four restaurants from the calculation of same-store sales because they were subject2022 compared to extraordinary adverse operating conditions in 2016 and 2017, related to construction blocking direct access or visibility to the restaurant,2021, primarily due higher debt service costs associated with our securitizations, partially offset by changes in working capital.

Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $3.7 million in the alcohol laws or political sanctions affecting the supply chain and the related local economy: Hamilton Mill Atlanta, Canyon, Texas, The Ezdan Mall Doha, Qatar, and the Kingdom Mall Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. If these restaurants were included, the same-store sales system-wide would have been negative 2.2% for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and negative 2.7% for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

For the 13 Weeks Ended September 24, 2017, as Compared to the 13 Weeks Ended September 25, 2016

Net Income – Net incomefirst quarter of Buffalo’s for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 increased by $167,000 or 121.9% to $304,000, as2022, compared to $137,000 fornet cash used in investing activities of $0.6 million in the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016.comparable period of 2021. The increase was primarily attributabledue to an increasehigher purchases of property and equipment in revenue of $305,000 or 93.0%, whichconnection with company-owned restaurants acquired during fiscal 2021.

Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was partially offset by increases in general and administrative expenses of $62,000 or 49.6% and an increase in the provision for income taxes of $76,000.

Revenues – Buffalo’s revenues consist of royalty fees and the recognition of franchise fees. Buffalo’s had revenues of $633,000 and $328,000$5.9 million for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017first quarter of 2022 and September 25, 2016, respectively. was primarily comprised of dividends paid on our Class A and Class B common stock and our Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock.

Dividends
On January 11, 2022, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.13 per share of Class A and Class B common stock, payable on March 1, 2022 to stockholders of record as of February 15, 2022, for a total of $2.1 million.
The increase in revenuedeclaration and payment of $305,000 is primarily the result of increases in recognized franchise fees in the 2017 period of $325,000. This increase was partially reduced by lower royalties in the 2017 period infuture dividends, as well as the amount of $20,000 due primarilythereof, are subject to the closurediscretion of two long-standing franchise locations in Atlanta, Georgiaour Board of Directors. The amount and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

13

General and Administrative Expenses –―General and administrative expensessize of Buffalo’s primarily consistany future dividends will depend upon our future results of payroll, consulting fees and an allocation of corporate overhead from FCCG. General and administrative expenses for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 increased by $62,000 or 49.6% to $187,000 as compared to $125,000 for the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in the corporate overhead allocation of $46,000; an increase in consulting fees of $38,000 and an increase in accounting costs of $14,000 which were partially offset by decreases in salary and wage expenses of $31,000operations, financial condition, capital levels, cash requirements and other net decreases of $5,000.

New Store Openings –factors. There werecan be no new stores opened by our Buffalo’s Cafe franchisees for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017orfor the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

Liquidityassurance that we will declare and pay dividends in future periods.

Capital Resources of Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts

Buffalo’s funds its operations primarily through franchise fees and royalties.We believe that cash provided by operating activities are adequate to fund our working capital obligations for the next 12 months. However, our ability to continue to meet these requirements and obligations will depend on, among other things, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of revenue and cash flow from operations and our ability to manage costs and working capital successfully.

Expenditures

As of September 24, 2017, Buffalo’s had current assets of $62,000, comprised primarily of accounts receivables. This compares with current assets of $54,000 as of December 25, 2016. The increase in current assets was due to an increase in accounts receivables.

Buffalo’s had current liabilities of $403,000 comprised primarily of deferred income of $152,000, accounts payable of $171,000 and other accrued expenses of $80,000 as of September 24, 2017. This compares with current liabilities of $438,000 comprised of deferred income of $253,000, accounts payable of $97,000 and accrued expenses of $88,000 as of December 25, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements of Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts

Buffalo’s doesMarch 27, 2022, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity,material commitments for capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

expenditures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates (Fatburger and Buffalo’s)

Goodwill and other intangible assets:Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, such as trademarks, are not amortized but are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if indicators arise. No impairment has been identified for the years ended December 25, 2016 and prior.

Revenue recognition (Fatburger):Franchise fee revenue from sales of individual franchises is recognized as revenue upon completion of training and the actual opening of a location. Typically, franchise fees are $50,000 for each domestic location and are collected 50% upon signing a deposit agreement and 50% at the signing of a lease and related franchise agreement. International franchise fees are typically $65,000 for each location, and are payable 100% upon signing a deposit agreement. The franchise fee may be adjusted at management’s discretion or in situations involving store transfers. Deposits are nonrefundable upon acceptance of the franchise application. These deposits are recorded as deferred income until the store opens. The company acknowledges that some of its franchisees have not complied with their development timelines for opening franchise stores. These franchise rights are terminated and franchise fee revenue is recognized for non-refundable deposits.

In addition to franchise fee revenue, the Company collects a royalty of 2.5% to 6% of net sales from its franchisees. Royalties are recognized as revenue as the related sales are made by the franchisees. Royalties collected in advance are classified as deferred income until earned.

Revenue recognition (Buffalo’s): Franchise fee revenue from sales of individual franchises is recognized upon completion of training and the actual opening of a location. Typically, franchise fees are $50,000 for each domestic location and are collected 50% upon signing a deposit agreement and 50% at the signing of a lease and related franchise agreement. International franchise fees are typically $65,000 for each location, and are payable 100% upon signing a deposit agreement. The company typically charges a $25,000 co-brand conversion fee, in addition to the initial franchise fee.

The franchise fee may be adjusted at management’s discretion or in a situation involving store transfers. Deposits are non-refundable upon acceptance of the franchise application. These deposits are recorded as deferred income until store opens. The company acknowledges some of its franchisees have not compiled with their development timelines for opening franchise stores. These franchise rights are terminated and franchise fee revenue is recognized for non-refundable deposits.

In addition to franchise fee revenue, the company collects a royalty calculated as a percentage of net sales from its franchisees. Royalties are recognized as revenue when the related sales are made by the franchisees.

Advertising (Fatburger): Fatburger requires advertising payments from franchisees of 1.95% of net sales from Fatburger restaurants located in the Los Angeles marketing area and up to 0.95% of net sales from stores located outside of the Los Angeles marketing area. International locations pay 0.20% to 0.95%. The company also receives, from time to time, payments from vendors that are to be used for advertising. Since advertising funds collected are required to be spent for specific advertising purposes, no revenue or expense is recorded for advertising funds. Cumulative advertising expenditures in excess of collections are recorded as current assets and will be reimbursed by future advertising payments from franchises and other Fatburger affiliates. Cumulative collections in excess of advertising expenditures are recorded as accrued expenses and represent advertising funds collected which have not yet been spent on advertising activities.

Advertising (Buffalo’s): Buffalo’s generally requires advertising payments from franchisees of 2.0% of net sales from Buffalo’s Southwest Cafe restaurants. Co-branded restaurants generally pay 0.20% to 1.95%. The company also receives, from time to time, payments from vendors that are to be used for advertising. Since the company acts in a fiduciary role to collect and disburse these advertising funds, no revenue or expense is recorded. Advertising funds are segregated from other Company assets and the balance of the Buffalo’s Creative and Advertising Fund is recorded as an asset by the company with the offsetting advertising obligation recorded as a liability, Buffalo’s Creative and Advertising Fund - Contra.

Use of estimates: The preparation of

Our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in conformityaccordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP. Preparing consolidated financial statements requires managementus to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and liabilitiesexpenses. These estimates and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities atassumptions are affected by the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606), requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods and services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either a full retrospective or retrospective with cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, making it effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, requiring a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with a lease term of more than twelve months. Leases will continue to be classified as either financing or operating, with classification affecting the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease. This ASU is effective for interim and annual period beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires a modified retrospective approach to adoption for lessees related to capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Early adoption is permitted. The company does not currently have any leases that will have an impact on the financial statements or disclosures as a result of the adoption of this ASU.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.

Results of Operations of Ponderosa

We were not affiliated with the Ponderosa entities until October 20, 2017. However, their future operations will be under our control. We are providing the following data regarding the results of operations of Ponderosa for the 39 weeks and 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016 for informational purposes. The results of Ponderosa’s future operations as partapplication of our consolidated group may be significantly different.

The following tables summarize key components of the results of operations of Ponderosa for the periods indicated:

  In thousands 
  39 Weeks ended  13 Weeks ended 
  September 24, 2017  September 25, 2016  September 24, 2017  September 25, 2016 
  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited)  (unaudited) 
Statement of operations:            
             
Revenues                
Royalties $3,202  $3,431  $1,106  $1,183 
Franchise fees  5   19   5   8 
Total revenues  3,207   3,450   1,111   1,191 
                 
General and administrative expense  2,009   1,965   674   644 
                 
Income from operations  1,198   1,485   437   547 
                 
Other income (expense)                
Interest income  19   18   19   5 
Other expense  -   -   (13)  - 
Total other income  19   18   6   5 
                 
Income before income tax expense  1,217   1,503   443   552 
                 
Income tax expense  52   80   18   29 
                 
Net income $1,165  $1,423  $425  $523 

Ponderosa results for the 39 Weeks Ended September 24, 2017, as Compared to the 39 Weeks Ended September 25, 2016

Net Income- Net income of Ponderosa for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 decreased by $258,000 or 18% to $1,165,000 compared to $1,423,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower royalty feesaccounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are described in the amount of $229,000.

Revenues- Ponderosa’s revenues consist of royalty fees and franchise fees. Ponderosa had revenues of $3,207,000 and $3,450,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016, respectively. The $243,000 or 7.0% decrease in revenues from the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016 to the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 was primarily driven by a decrease in royalty revenue due to a reduced number of franchised steakhouses in the 2017 period.

General and Administrative Expense- General and administrative expense of Ponderosa consists primarily of payroll, management fees and professional fees. General and administrative expenses for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 increased $44,000 or 2.2% to $2,009,000, as compared to $1,965,000 for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016. This was primarily the result of an increase in professional fees.

New Store Openings-For the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017, Ponderosa franchisees opened 1 location as compared to 2 locations for the 39 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

Income Tax Expense-Ponderosa has historically been operating in pass-through entities for income tax purposes, meaning that taxable income is not recognized at the entity level, but passed through to the shareholders. As a result, the tax expense at the Ponderosa level is generally incurred only from taxing authorities who do not recognize the pass-through feature of United States federal tax laws. Following our acquisition of Ponderosa, the pass-through status for tax purposes will terminate and Ponderosa will generally become subject to income tax expense.

16

Ponderosa results for the 13 Weeks Ended September 24, 2017, as Compared to the 13 Weeks Ended September 25, 2016

Net Income- Net income of Ponderosa for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 decreased by $98,000 or 18.7% to $425,000 compared to $523,000 for the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower royalty fees in the amount of $77,000 resulting from a reduction in the number of operating restaurants in 2017.

Revenues- Ponderosa had revenues of $1,111,000 and $1,191,000 for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and September 25, 2016, respectively. The $80,000 or 6.7% decrease in revenues from the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016 to the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 was primarily the result of the decrease in royalties.

General and Administrative Expenses- General and administrative expenses for the 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017 increased $30,000 or 4.7% to $674,000 as compared to $644,000 for the 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016. This was primarily the result of an increase in professional fees.

New store openings-Forthe 13 weeks ended September 24, 2017, Ponderosa franchisees opened 1 store as compared to 2 stores forthe 13 weeks ended September 25, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of Ponderosa North America

Ponderosa funds its operations primarily through franchise fees and royalties.We believe that cash provided by operating activities are adequate to fund our working capital obligations for the next 12 months. However, our ability to continue to meet these requirements and obligations will dependAnnual Report on among other things, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of revenue and cash flow from operations and our ability to manage costs and working capital successfully.

As of September 24, 2017, Ponderosa had current assets of $583,000 comprised of cash in the amount of $117,000 and accounts receivables in the amount of $466,000. This compares with current assets of $617,000 as of December 25, 2016.

Ponderosa did not have any current liabilities as of September 24, 2017 or December 25, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements of Ponderosa North America

Ponderosa does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Pro forma Consolidated Financial Information

The following financial information presents the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of continuing operations as of and for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017, and the year ended December 25, 2016 (“fiscal 2016”) based upon the consolidated historical financial statements of Fatburger, Buffalo’s and Ponderosa after giving effect to the following transactions (“Transactions”):

the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of common stock in the initial public offering of FAT Brands Inc. at $12.00 per share; and
the Reorganization Transactions.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and the year ended December 25, 2016 give effect to the Transactions as if each of them had occurred on December 28, 2015. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 24, 2017 gives effect to the Transactions as if each of them had occurred on September 24, 2017.

We have derived the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and the year ended December 25, 2016 from the unaudited financial statements of Fatburger North America, Inc. and the consolidated financial statements of Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts, Inc. and Subsidiary for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017 and the audited financial statements of Fatburger North America, Inc. and the consolidated financial statements of Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts, Inc. and SubsidiaryForm 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2016.

The pro forma adjustments related26, 2021. Critical accounting estimates are those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. While we apply our

24

judgment based on assumptions believed to be reasonable under the Reorganization Transactionscircumstances, actual results could vary from these assumptions. It is possible that materially different amounts would be reported using different assumptions. Our critical accounting estimates are identified and the Offering are described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information, and principally include the following:

Issuance of shares of our common stock to the purchasers in the Offering in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $21,200,000, reflecting that the shares were sold at $12.00 per share and after deducting Selling Agent fees and Offering expenses.
Contribution by FCCG of two of its operating subsidiaries, Fatburger North America Inc. and Buffalo’s Franchise Concepts Inc., to FAT Brands Inc. in exchange for an unsecured promissory note with a principal balance of $30,000,000, bearing interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, and maturing in five years (the “Related Party Debt”).
Consummation by FCCG of the acquisition of Homestyle Dining LLC, and transfer of the four Ponderosa operating subsidiaries to FAT Brands Inc. as new operating subsidiaries (the “Ponderosa Acquisition”).

Application of the net proceeds of the Offering as follows:

(i) $10,550,000 to fund the Ponderosa Acquisition by FCCG; and

(ii) $9,500,000 to repay a portion of Related Party Debt owed to FCCG.

Entering into a Tax Sharing Agreement with FCCG that provides that FCCG will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, file consolidated federal, California and Oregon (and possibly other jurisdictions where revenue is generated, at FCCG’s election) income tax returns with us and our subsidiaries. We will pay to FCCG the amount that our tax liability would have been had we filed a separate return and not been consolidated with FCCG. To the extent our required payment exceeds our share of the actual consolidated income tax liability (which may occur due to the application of FCCG’s net operating loss carryforwards), we will be permitted to reimburse FCCG in cash or, at the election of a committee of our board of directors comprised solely of directors not affiliated with or interested in FCCG, we may issue to FCCG an equivalent amount of our common stock in lieu of cash, valued at the fair market value of our common stock at the time of such payment. In addition, our inter-company receivable of approximately $13,175,000 due from FCCG (recorded as “due from affiliates”) will be applied first to reduce such excess income tax payment obligation to FCCG under the Tax Sharing Agreement.

The pro forma adjustments related to the acquisition of Ponderosa are described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information, and principally includes the assumption that Ponderosa did not have any cash or related party indebtedness when they were acquired.

As a new public company, we will be implementing additional procedures and processes for the purpose of addressing the reporting and internal control and other standards and requirements applicable to public companies. We expect to incur additional annual expenses related to these steps and, among other things, additional directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, director fees, reporting requirements of the SEC, transfer agent fees, hiring additional accounting, legal and administrative personnel, increased auditing and legal fees and similar expenses. We have not included any pro forma adjustments relating to these added costs.

The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and methodologies that are factually supportable and directly related to the Reorganization Transactions. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information includes various estimates which are subject to material change and may not be indicative of what our operations or financial position would have been had the Reorganization Transactions taken place on the dates indicated, or that may be expected to occur in the future.

FAT Brands Inc.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the 39 weeks Ended September 24, 2017

(In thousands)

  Predecessor Entities  FAT Brands     The  Acquisition  Pro Forma 
  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Inc.  Ponderosa  Offering  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                      
Revenues                            
Royalties $3,580  $920  $4,500  $3,202  $-  $-  $7,702 
Franchise fees  1,683   430   2,113   5   -   -   2,118 
Management fee  47   -   47   -   -   -   47 
Total revenues  5,310   1,350   6,660   3,207   -   -   9,867 
                             
General and administrative expenses  1,852   503   2,355   2,009   653   -   5,017 
                             
Income (loss) from operations  3,458   847   4,305   1,198   (653)  -   4,850 
                             
Other income (expense)                            
Interest income (expense), net  -   -   -   19   713   (1,304)  (572)
Other expense  (23)  -   (23)  -   -   -   (23)
Total other income (expense)  (23)  -   (23)  19   713   (1,304)  (595)
                             
Income (loss) before income tax expense  3,435   847   4,282   1,217   60   (1,304)  4,255 
                             
Income tax expense (benefit)  1,264   277   1,541   52   21   (83)  1,531 
                             
Net income (loss) $2,171  $570  $2,741  $1,165  $39  $(1,221) $2,724 

FAT Brands Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 25, 2016

(In thousands)

  Predecessor Entities  FAT Brands     The  Acquisition  Pro Forma 
  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Inc.  Ponderosa  Offering  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                      
Revenues                            
Royalties $4,632  $1,349  $5,981  $4,429  $-  $-  $10,410 
Franchise fees  3,750   255   4,005   40   -   -   4,045 
Management fee  75   -   75   -   -   -   75 
Total revenues  8,457   1,604   10,061   4,469   -   -   14,530 
                             
General and administrative expenses  2,932   663   3,595   2,565   871   -   7,031 
                             
Income (loss) from operations  5,525   941   6,466   1,904   (871)  -   7,499 
                             
Other income (expense)                            
Interest income (expense), net  -   -   -   25   950   (1,868)  (893)
Other income  -   36   36   40   -   -   76 
Total other income (expense)  -   36   36   65   950   (1,868)  (817)
                             
Income (loss) before income tax expense  5,525   977   6,502   1,969   79   (1,868)  6,682 
                             
Income tax expense (benefit)  1,979   319   2,298   93   28   (57)  2,362 
                             
Net income (loss) $3,546  $658  $4,204  $1,876  $51  $(1,811) $4,320 

FAT Brands Inc.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

As of September 24, 2017

(In thousands)

  Predecessor Entities  FAT
Brands
     The  Acquisition  Pro Forma 
  Fatburger  Buffalo’s  Inc.  Ponderosa  Offering  Adjustments  Consolidated 
                      
Assets                            
Current Assets                            
Cash $-  $-  $-  $117  $11,700  $(10,667) $1,150 
Accounts receivable, net  486   62   -   466   -   -   1,014 
Other current assets  8   -   -   -   -   -   8 
Total current assets  494   62   -   583   11,700   (10,667)  2,172 
                             
Due from affiliates  10,667   2,508   (201)  -   201   -   13,175 
Deferred income taxes  1,266   109   -   -   -   -   1,375 
Notes receivable, net  -   -   -   434   -   -   434 
Trademarks  2,135   30   8   959   -   8,817   11,949 
Deferred offering costs  -   -   224   -   (224)  -     
Goodwill  529   5,365   -   -   -   -   5,894 
Buffalo’s creative and advertising fund  -   369   -   -   -   -   369 
Total assets $15,091  $8,443  $31  $1,976  $11,677  $(1,850) $35,368 
                             
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity                            
Current liabilities                            
Accounts payable $1,421  $171  $31  $-  $(23) $-  $1,600 
Accrued expenses  1,556   80   -   -   -   -   1,636 
Deferred income  1,877   152   -   -   -   -   2,029 
Note payable - affiliate  -   -   -   -   (9,500)  30,000   20,500 
Total current liabilities  4,854   403   31   -   (9,523)  30,000   25,765 
                             
Deferred income – noncurrent  1,239   213   -   126   -   -   1,578 
Buffalo’s creative and advertising fund - contra  -   369   -   -   -   -   369 
Total liabilities  6,093   985   31   126   (9,523)  30,000   27,712 
                             
Commitments and contingencies                            
                             
Stockholder’s equity                            
Common stock  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  3,500   5,139   -   -   21,200   (29,839)  - 
Partners’ equity  -   -   -   1,850   -   (1,850)  - 
Retained earnings  5498   2,319   -   -   -   (161)  7,656 
Total stockholder’s equity  8,998   7,458   -   1,850   21,200   (31,850)  7,656 
                             
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity $15,091  $8,443  $31  $1,976  $11,677  $(1,850) $35,368 

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Basis of presentation –The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are based on the historical financial statements of FAT Brands, Fatburger, Buffalo’s and Ponderosa, as adjusted to give effect to the acquisition of Ponderosa. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the 39 weeks ended September 24, 2017, and the twelve monthsrelated notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 26, 2021

25 2016 give effect to the acquisitions as if they had occurred on December 28, 2015. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as

Table of September 24, 2017 gives effect to the acquisitions as if they had occurred on September 24, 2017.

(2) Preliminary purchase price allocation – On March 10, 2017, FCCG entered into an agreement to acquire the parent company of Ponderosa for total consideration of approximately $10,550,000. A portion of our Offering proceeds were provided to FCCG to complete the acquisition and we became the parent company for the Ponderosa operating entities. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information includes various assumptions, including those related to the preliminary purchase price allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Ponderosa and Bonanza based on management’s best estimates of fair value. The final purchase price allocation may vary based on final appraisals, valuations and analyses of the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. Accordingly, the pro forma adjustments are preliminary and have been made solely for illustrative purposes.

The following table shows the preliminary allocation of the purchase price for Ponderosa to the acquired identifiable assets:

(In thousands)

Total purchase price $10,550 
Accounts receivable $466 
Notes receivable  434 
Trademarks  9,776 
Deferred income  (126)
Total identifiable assets $10,550 

(3) Trademarks – We based our preliminary estimate of trademarks that we expect to recognize as part of the acquisitions on the purchase price that we have entered into with the sellers. However, these estimates are preliminary, as we have not analyzed all the facts surrounding the business acquired and therefore have not been able to finalize the accounting for these transactions. These estimates will be refined once a third-party valuation is completed.

(4) Cash Received from IPO – Net proceeds from the Offering were approximately $21,200,000, based on the initial public offering price of $12.00 per share, and after deducting estimated cash selling agent fees of $1,780,800 and estimated Offering expenses of $1,019,200.

(5) Pro forma adjustments – The pro forma adjustments are based on our preliminary estimates and assumptions that are subject to change. The following adjustments have been reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information:

Adjustments to the pro forma condensed statement of operations

(a)Reflects the income tax effect of pro forma adjustments based on the estimated blended statutory tax rate of 36.0%.
(b)Reflects the $20,500,000 Related Party Debt accruing annual interest expense at 10% and the average balance of the inter-company credit accruing annual interest income at 10%.
(c)Increase in compensation expenses related to the grant of 367,500 stock options which were issued under the 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan to directors and employees upon consummation of the Offering. This amount was calculated assuming the stock options were granted on December 28, 2015 at an exercise price equal to the offering price of $12.00 per share. The grant date fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model using the following assumptions:

Expected volatility31.73%
Expected dividend yield4.00%
Expected term (in years)3.0
Risk-free interest rate1.01%

Adjustments to the pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet

(d)Acquisition of Ponderosa was cash-free and debt-free at closing.
(e)Reflects the assumed value of trademarks acquired in the purchase of Ponderosa, pending third party valuation.
(f)Issuance of $30,000,000 note to FCCG for the contribution of Fatburger and Buffalo’s, and payment of $9,500,000 in principal amount of this note from proceeds of the Offering.
(g)Costs associated with the Offering were charged against the proceeds of the Offering, with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital from the Offering.

Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Required.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of September 24, 2017,March 27, 2022, have concluded that, in regard to the segregation of duties and the financial close process, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designedeffective.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with an evaluation that occurred during the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2022 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to ensure that material information relating to us andmaterially affect our Combined subsidiaries is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company doesinternal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations Over Internal Controls
We do not expect that itsour disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedures are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The Company considered these limitations duringAlso, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the developmentrisk that controls may become inadequate because of its disclosure controls and procedures, and will continually reevaluate them to ensure they provide reasonable assurance that such controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting in connectionconditions or that the degree of compliance with an evaluation that occurred during the third quarter ending September 24, 2017 that have materially affectedpolicies or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

procedures may deteriorate.

26

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are currently involved

For a description of our material pending legal proceedings, please see Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in various claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these actions will have a material adverse effectthis Quarterly Report on our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. However, a significant increase in the number of these claims or an increase in amounts owing under successful claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Form 10-Q.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Except for

You should carefully consider the historical information contained herein or incorporated by reference, this report and the information incorporated by reference contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include projections about our accounting and finances, plans and objectives for the future, future operating and economic performance and other statements regarding future performance. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or events. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in this report. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the following section, as well as thosefactors discussed in Part I, Item 2 entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere throughout this reportin our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 23, 2022, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or future results. There have been no material changes in such factors discussed in our Annual Report. The risks described in our Annual Report are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and in any documents incorporated in this report by reference.

You should consider carefully the following risk factors and in all of the other information included or incorporated in this report. If any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, or other risksuncertainties not presentlycurrently known to us or that we currently believedeem to not be significant, develop into actual events, then our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially adversely affected. If that happens, the market price of our common stock could decline, and stockholdersimmaterial also may lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our operating and financial results and growth strategies are closely tied to the success of our franchisees.

Substantially all of our restaurants are operated by our franchisees, which makes us dependent on the financial success and cooperation of our franchisees. We have limited control over how our franchisees’ businesses are run, and the inability of franchisees to operate successfully could adversely affect our operating and financial results through decreased royalty payments. If our franchisees incur too much debt, if their operating expenses or commodity prices increase or if economic or sales trends deteriorate such that they are unable to operate profitably or repay existing debt, it could result in their financial distress, including insolvency or bankruptcy. If a significant franchisee or a significant number of our franchisees become financially distressed, our operating and financial results could be impacted through reduced or delayed royalty payments. Our success also depends on the willingness and ability of our franchisees to implement major initiatives, which may include financial investment. Our franchisees may be unable to successfully implement strategies that we believe are necessary for their further growth, which in turn may harm the growth prospects and financial condition of the company. Additionally, the failure of our franchisees to focus on the fundamentals of restaurant operations, such as quality service and cleanliness (even if such failures do not rise to the level of breaching the related franchise documents), could have a negative impact on our business.

Our franchisees could take actions that could harm our business and may not accurately report sales.

Our franchisees are contractually obligated to operate their restaurants in accordance with the operations, safety, and health standards set forth in our agreements with them and applicable laws. However, although we will attempt to properly train and support all of our franchisees, franchisees are independent third parties whom we do not control. The franchisees own, operate, and oversee the daily operations of their restaurants, and their employees are not our employees. Accordingly, their actions are outside of our control. Although we have developed criteria to evaluate and screen prospective franchisees, we cannot be certain that our franchisees will have the business acumen or financial resources necessary to operate successful franchises at their approved locations, and state franchise laws may limit our ability to terminate or not renew these franchise agreements. Moreover, despite our training, support and monitoring, franchisees may not successfully operate restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards and requirements, or may not hire and adequately train qualified managers and other restaurant personnel. The failure of our franchisees to operate their franchises in accordance with our standards or applicable law, actions taken by their employees or a negative publicity event at one of our franchised restaurants or involving one of our franchisees could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, our brands, our ability to attract prospective franchisees, our company-owned restaurants, and our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Franchisees typically use a point of sale, or POS, cash register system to record all sales transactions at the restaurant. We require franchisees to use a particular brand or model of hardware or software components for their restaurant system. Currently, franchisees report sales manually and electronically, but we do not have the ability to verify all sales data electronically by accessing their POS cash register systems. We have the right under our franchise agreement to audit franchisees to verify sales information provided to us, and we have the ability to indirectly verify sales based on purchasing information. However, franchisees may underreport sales, which would reduce royalty income otherwise payable to us and adversely affect our operating and financial results.

If we fail to identify, recruit and contract with a sufficient number of qualified franchisees, our ability to open new franchised restaurants and increase our revenues could be materially adversely affected.

The opening of additional franchised restaurants depends, in part, upon the availability of prospective franchisees who meet our criteria. Most of our franchisees open and operate multiple restaurants, and our growth strategy requires us to identify, recruit and contract with a significant number of new franchisees each year. We may not be able to identify, recruit or contract with suitable franchisees in our target markets on a timely basis or at all. In addition, our franchisees may not have access to the financial or management resources that they need to open the restaurants contemplated by their agreements with us, or they may elect to cease restaurant development for other reasons. If we are unable to recruit suitable franchisees or if franchisees are unable or unwilling to open new restaurants as planned, our growth may be slower than anticipated, which could materially adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to open new domestic and international franchisee-owned restaurants on a timely basis, our ability to increase our revenues could be materially adversely affected.

A significant component of our growth strategy includes the opening of new domestic and international franchised restaurants. Our franchisees face many challenges associated with opening new restaurants, including:

identification and availability of suitable restaurant locations with the appropriate size, visibility, traffic patterns, local residential neighborhoods, local retail and business attractions and infrastructure that will drive high levels of customer traffic and sales per restaurant;
competition with other restaurants and retail concepts for potential restaurant sites and anticipated commercial, residential and infrastructure development near new or potential restaurants;
ability to negotiate acceptable lease arrangements;
availability of financing and ability to negotiate acceptable financing terms;
recruiting, hiring and training of qualified personnel;
construction and development cost management;
completing their construction activities on a timely basis;
obtaining all necessary governmental licenses, permits and approvals and complying with local, state and federal laws and regulations to open, construct or remodel and operate our franchised restaurants;
unforeseen engineering or environmental problems with the leased premises;
avoiding the impact of adverse weather during the construction period; and
other unanticipated increases in costs, delays or cost overruns.

As a result of these challenges, our franchisees may not be able to open new restaurants as quickly as planned or at all. Our franchisees have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, delays in restaurant openings from time to time and have abandoned plans to open restaurants in various markets on occasion. Any delays or failures to open new restaurants by our franchisees could materially and adversely affect our growth strategy and our results of operations.

Our strategy includes pursuing opportunistic acquisitions of additional brands, and we may not find suitable acquisition candidates or successfully operate or integrate any brands that we may acquire.

As part of our strategy, we intend to opportunistically acquire new brands and restaurant concepts. Although we believe that opportunities for future acquisitions may be available from time to time, competition for acquisition candidates may exist or increase in the future. Consequently, there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available to us as well as higher acquisition prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire, manage or successfully integrate additional brands or restaurant concepts without substantial costs, delays or operational or financial problems.

The difficulties of integration includecoordinating and consolidating geographically separated systems and facilities, integrating the management and personnel of the acquired brands, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees, implementing our management information systems and financial accounting and reporting systems, establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and implementing operational procedures and disciplines to control costs and increase profitability.

In the event we are able to acquire additional brands or restaurant concepts, the integration and operation of such acquisitions may place significant demands on our management, which could adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants. In addition, we may be required to obtain additional financing to fund future acquisitions, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms or at all.

We may not achieve our target development goals and the addition of new franchised restaurants may not be profitable.

Our growth strategy depends in part on our ability to add franchisees and our franchisees’ ability to increase our net restaurant count in domestic and foreign markets. The successful development and retention of new restaurants depends in large part on our ability to attract franchisee investment commitments and the ability of our franchisees to open new restaurants and operate these restaurants profitably. We cannot guarantee that we or our current or future franchisees will be able to achieve our expansion goals or that new restaurants will be operated profitably. Further, there is no assurance that any new restaurant will produce operating results similar to those of our franchisees’ existing restaurants.

Expansion into target markets could also be affected by our franchisees’ ability to obtain financing to construct and open new restaurants. If it becomes more difficult or more expensive for our franchisees to obtain financing to develop new restaurants, the expected growth of our system could slow and our future revenues and operating cash flows could be adversely impacted.

Opening new franchise restaurants in existing markets and aggressive development could cannibalize existing sales and may negatively affect sales at existing franchised restaurants.

We intend to continue opening new franchised restaurants in our existing markets as a core part of our growth strategy. Expansion in existing markets may be affected by local economic and market conditions. Further, the customer target area of our franchisees’ restaurants varies by location, depending on a number of factors, including population density, other local retail and business attractions, area demographics and geography. As a result, the opening of a new restaurant in or near markets in which our franchisees’ restaurants already exist could adversely affect the sales of these existing franchised restaurants. Our franchisees may selectively open new restaurants in and around areas of existing franchised restaurants. Sales cannibalization between restaurants may become significant in the future as we continue to expand our operations and could affect sales growth, which could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. There can be no assurance that sales cannibalization will not occur or become more significant in the future as we increase our presence in existing markets.

The number of new franchised restaurants that actually open in the future may differ materially from the number of signed commitments from potential new franchisees.

The number of new franchised restaurants that actually open in the future may differ materially from the number of signed commitments from potential new franchisees. Historically, a portion of our commitments sold have not ultimately opened as new franchised restaurants. The historic conversion rate of signed commitments to new franchised locations may not be indicative of the conversion rates we will experience in the future and the total number of new franchised restaurants actually opened in the future may differ materially from the number of signed commitments disclosed at any point in time.

Termination of development agreements with certain franchisees could adversely impact our revenues.

We enter into development agreements with certain franchisees that plan to open multiple restaurants in a designated area. These franchisees are granted certain rights with respect to specified territories, and at their discretion, these franchisees may open more restaurants than specified in their agreements. In fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 we derived 39.8%, 31.5% and 27.1%, respectively, of our franchise and development fees from development agreements. The termination of development agreements with a franchisee or a lack of expansion by these franchisees could result in the delay of the development of franchised restaurants, discontinuation or an interruption in the operation of one of our brands in a particular market or markets. We may not be able to find another operator to resume development activities in such market or markets. While termination of development agreements may result in a short-term recognition of forfeited deposits as revenue, any such delay, discontinuation or interruption would result in a delay in, or loss of, long-term royalty income to us by way of reduced sales and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our brands may be limited or diluted through franchisee and third party activity.

Although we monitor and regulate franchisee activities through our franchise agreements, franchisees or other third parties may refer to or make statements about our brands that do not make proper use of our trademarks or required designations, that improperly alter trademarks or branding, or that are critical of our brands or place our brands in a context that may tarnish our reputation. This may result in dilution of or harm to our intellectual property or the value of our brands. Franchisee noncompliance with the terms and conditions of our franchise agreements may reduce the overall goodwill of our brands, whether through the failure to meet health and safety standards, engage in quality control or maintain product consistency, or through the participation in improper or objectionable business practices. Moreover, unauthorized third parties may use our intellectual property to trade on the goodwill of our brands, resulting in consumer confusion or dilution. Any reduction of our brands’ goodwill, consumer confusion, or dilution is likely to impact sales, and could materially and adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Our success depends substantially on our corporate reputation and on the value and perception of our brands.

Our success depends in large part upon our and our franchisees’ ability to maintain and enhance the value of our brands and our customers’ loyalty to our brands. Brand value is based in part on consumer perceptions on a variety of subjective qualities. Business incidents, whether isolated or recurring, and whether originating from us, franchisees, competitors, suppliers or distributors, can significantly reduce brand value and consumer trust, particularly if the incidents receive considerable publicity or result in litigation. For example, our brands could be damaged by claims or perceptions about the quality or safety of our products or the quality or reputation of our suppliers, distributors or franchisees, regardless of whether such claims or perceptions are true. Similarly, entities in our supply chain may engage in conduct, including alleged human rights abuses or environmental wrongdoing, and any such conduct could damage our or our brands’ reputations. Any such incidents (even if resulting from actions of a competitor or franchisee) could cause a decline directly or indirectly in consumer confidence in, or the perception of, our brands and/or our products and reduce consumer demand for our products, which would likely result in lower revenues and profits. Additionally, our corporate reputation could suffer from a real or perceived failure of corporate governance or misconduct by a company officer, or an employee or representative of us or a franchisee.

Our success depends in part upon effective advertising and marketing campaigns, which may not be successful, and franchisee support of such advertising and marketing campaigns.

We believe our brands are critical to our business. We expend resources in our marketing efforts using a variety of media, including social media. We expect to continue to conduct brand awareness programs and customer initiatives to attract and retain customers. Additionally, some of our competitors have greater financial resources, which enable them to spend significantly more on marketing and advertising than us. Should our competitors increase spending on marketing and advertising, or should our advertising and promotions be less effective than our competitors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

The support of our franchisees is critical for the success of our advertising and marketing campaigns we seek to undertake, and the successful execution of these campaigns will depend on our ability to maintain alignment with our franchisees. Our franchisees are required to spend approximately 1%-3% of net sales directly on local advertising or contribute to a local fund managed by franchisees in certain market areas to fund the purchase of advertising media. Our franchisees are also required to contribute 1% of their net sales to a national fund to support the development of new products, brand development and national marketing programs. In addition, we, our franchisees and other third parties have contributed additional advertising funds in the past. While we maintain control over advertising and marketing materials and can mandate certain strategic initiatives pursuant to our franchise agreements, we need the active support of our franchisees if the implementation of these initiatives is to be successful. Additional advertising funds are not contractually required, and we, our franchisees and other third parties may choose to discontinue contributing additional funds in the future. Any significant decreases in our advertising and marketing funds or financial support for advertising activities could significantly curtail our marketing efforts, which may in turn materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our inability or failure to recognize, respond to and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media could adversely impact our business.

In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms, including blogs, chat platforms, social media websites, and other forms of Internet based communications which allow individuals access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. The rising popularity of social media and other consumer oriented technologies has increased the speed and accessibility of information dissemination. Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their subscribers and participants post, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted. Information posted on such platforms at any time may be adverse to our interests and/or may be inaccurate. The dissemination of information via social media could harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations, regardless of the information’s accuracy. The damage may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction.

In addition, social media is frequently used to communicate with our customers and the public in general. Failure by us to use social media effectively or appropriately, particularly as compared to our brands’ respective competitors, could lead to a decline in brand value, customer visits and revenue. Other risks associated with the use of social media include improper disclosure of proprietary information, negative comments about our brands, exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, hoaxes or malicious dissemination of false information. The inappropriate use of social media by our customers or employees could increase our costs, lead to litigation or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations.

Negative publicity relating to one of our franchised restaurants could reduce sales at some or all of our other franchised restaurants.

Our success is dependent in part upon our ability to maintain and enhance the value of our brands, consumers’ connection to our brands and positive relationships with our franchisees. We may, from time to time, be faced with negative publicity relating to food quality, public health concerns, restaurant facilities, customer complaints or litigation alleging illness or injury, health inspection scores, integrity of our franchisees or their suppliers’ food processing, employee relationships or other matters, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are held to be responsible. The negative impact of adverse publicity relating to one franchised restaurant may extend far beyond that restaurant or franchisee involved to affect some or all of our other franchised restaurants. The risk of negative publicity is particularly great with respect to our franchised restaurants because we are limited in the manner in which we can regulate them, especially on a real-time basis. The considerable expansion in the use of social media over recent years can further amplify any negative publicity, and do so very quickly, that could be generated by such incidents. A similar risk exists with respect to unrelated food service businesses, if consumers associate those businesses with our own operations. Additionally, employee claims against us based on, among other things, wage and hour violations, discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination may also create negative publicity that could adversely affect us and divert our financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations. A significant increase in the number of these claims or an increase in the number of successful claims would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Consumer demand for our products and our brands’ value could diminish significantly if any such incidents or other matters create negative publicity or otherwise erode consumer confidence in us or our products, which would likely result in lower sales and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to protect our service marks or other intellectual property could harm our business.

We regard our Fatburger®, Buffalo’s Cafe®, Ponderosa® and Bonanza® service marks, and other service marks and trademarks related to our franchise restaurant businesses, as having significant value and being important to our marketing efforts. We rely on a combination of protections provided by contracts, copyrights, patents, trademarks, service marks and other common law rights, such as trade secret and unfair competition laws, to protect our franchised restaurants and services from infringement. We have registered certain trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. However, from time to time we become aware of names and marks identical or confusingly similar to our service marks being used by other persons. Although our policy is to oppose any such infringement, further or unknown unauthorized uses or other misappropriation of our trademarks or service marks could diminish the value of our brands and adversely affect our business. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our franchisees have, or intend to open or franchise, a restaurant. There can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate and defending or enforcing our service marks and other intellectual property could result in the expenditure of significant resources. We may also face claims of infringement that could interfere with the use of the proprietary knowhow, concepts, recipes, or trade secrets used in our business. Defending against such claims may be costly, and we may be prohibited from using such proprietary information in the future or forced to pay damages, royalties, or other fees for using such proprietary information, any of which could negatively affect our business, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations.

If our franchisees are unable to protect their customers’ credit card data and other personal information, our franchisees could be exposed to data loss, litigation, and liability, and our reputation could be significantly harmed.

Privacy protection is increasingly demanding, and the use of electronic payment methods and collection of other personal information expose our franchisees to increased risk of privacy and/or security breaches as well as other risks. The majority of our franchisees’ restaurant sales are by credit or debit cards. In connection with credit or debit card transactions in-restaurant, our franchisees collect and transmit confidential information by way of secure private retail networks. Additionally, our franchisees collect and store personal information from individuals, including their customers and employees.

Although our franchisees use secure private networks to transmit confidential information and debit card sales, our security measures and those of technology vendors may not effectively prohibit others from obtaining improper access to this information. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and are often difficult to detect for long periods of time, which may cause a breach to go undetected for an extensive period of time. Advances in computer and software capabilities, new tools, and other developments may increase the risk of such a breach. Further, the systems currently used for transmission and approval of electronic payment transactions, and the technology utilized in electronic payment themselves, all of which can put electronic payment at risk, are determined and controlled by the payment card industry, not by us, through enforcement of compliance with the Payment Card Industry-Data Security Standards. Our franchisees must abide by the Payment Card Industry-Data Security Standards, as modified from time to time, in order to accept electronic payment transactions. Furthermore, the payment card industry is requiring vendors to become compatible with smart chip technology for payment cards, referred to as EMV-Compliant, or else bear full responsibility for certain fraud losses, referred to as the EMV Liability Shift, which could adversely affect our business. To become EMV-Compliant, merchants must utilize EMV-Compliant payment card terminals at the point of sale and also obtain a variety of certifications. The EMV Liability Shift became effective on October 1, 2015.

If a person is able to circumvent our franchisees’ security measures or those of third parties, he or she could destroy or steal valuable information or disrupt our operations. Our franchisees may become subject to claims for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of credit or debit card information, and our franchisees may also be subject to lawsuits or other proceedings relating to these types of incidents. Any such claim or proceeding could cause our franchisees to incur significant unplanned expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, adverse publicity resulting from these allegations could significantly harm our reputation and may have a material adverse effect on us and our franchisees’ business.

We and our franchisees rely on computer systems to process transactions and manage our business, and a disruption or a failure of such systems or technology could harm our ability to effectively manage our business.

Network and information technology systems are integral to our business. We utilize various computer systems, including our franchisee reporting system, by which our franchisees report their weekly sales and pay their corresponding royalty fees and required advertising fund contributions. When sales are reported by a franchisee, a withdrawal for the authorized amount is initiated from the franchisee’s bank on a set date each week based on gross sales during the week ended the prior Sunday. This system is critical to our ability to accurately track sales and compute royalties and advertising fund contributions and receive timely payments due from our franchisees. Our operations depend upon our ability to protect our computer equipment and systems against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or other catastrophic events, as well as from internal and external security breaches, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems. Any damage or failure of our computer systems or network infrastructure that causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business and subject us to litigation or actions by regulatory authorities. Despite the implementation of protective measures, our systems are subject to damage and/or interruption as a result of power outages, computer and network failures, computer viruses and other disruptive software, security breaches, catastrophic events, and improper usage by employees. Such events could result in a material disruption in operations, a need for a costly repair, upgrade or replacement of systems, or a decrease in, or in the collection of, royalties and advertising fund contributions paid to us by our franchisees. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability which could materially affect our results of operations. It is also critical that we establish and maintain certain licensing and software agreements for the software we use in our day-to-day operations. A failure to procure or maintain these licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

We may engage in litigation with our franchisees.

Although we believe we generally enjoy a positive working relationship with the vast majority of our franchisees, the nature of the franchisor-franchisee relationship may give rise to litigation with our franchisees. In the ordinary course of business, we are the subject of complaints or litigation from franchisees, usually related to alleged breaches of contract or wrongful termination under the franchise arrangements. We may also engage in future litigation with franchisees to enforce the terms of our franchise agreements and compliance with our brand standards as determined necessary to protect our brands, the consistency of our products and the customer experience. We may also engage in future litigation with franchisees to enforce our contractual indemnification rights if we are brought into a matter involving a third party due to the franchisee’s alleged acts or omissions. In addition, we may be subject to claims by our franchisees relating to our franchise disclosure document, including claims based on financial information contained in our franchise disclosure document. Engaging in such litigation may be costly and time-consuming and may distract management and materially adversely affect our relationships with franchisees and our ability to attract new franchisees. Any negative outcome of these or any other claims could materially adversely affect our results of operations as well as our ability to expand our franchise system and may damage our reputation and brands. Furthermore, existing and future franchise-related legislation could subject us to additional litigation risk in the event we terminate or fail to renew a franchise relationship.

The retail food industry in which we operate is highly competitive.

The retail food industry in which we operate is highly competitive with respect to price and quality of food products, new product development, advertising levels and promotional initiatives, customer service, reputation, restaurant location, and attractiveness and maintenance of properties. If consumer or dietary preferences change, if our marketing efforts are unsuccessful, or if our franchisees’ restaurants are unable to compete successfully with other retail food outlets in new and existing markets, our business could be adversely affected. We also face growing competition as a result of convergence in grocery, convenience, deli and restaurant services, including the offering by the grocery industry of convenient meals, including pizzas and entrees with side dishes. Competition from delivery aggregators and other food delivery services has also increased in recent years, particularly in urbanized areas. Increased competition could have an adverse effect on our sales, profitability or development plans, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.

Shortages or interruptions in the availability and delivery of food and other supplies may increase costs or reduce revenues.

The food products sold by our franchisees are sourced from a variety of domestic and international suppliers. We, along with our franchisees, are also dependent upon third parties to make frequent deliveries of food products and supplies that meet our specifications at competitive prices. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of food items and other supplies to our franchisees’ restaurants could adversely affect the availability, quality and cost of items we use and the operations of our franchisees’ restaurants. Such shortages or disruptions could be caused by inclement weather, natural disasters, increased demand, problems in production or distribution, restrictions on imports or exports, the inability of vendors to obtain credit, political instability in the countries in which suppliers and distributors are located, the financial instability of suppliers and distributors, suppliers’ or distributors’ failure to meet our standards, product quality issues, inflation, the price of gasoline, other factors relating to the suppliers and distributors and the countries in which they are located, food safety warnings or advisories or the prospect of such pronouncements, the cancellation of supply or distribution agreements or an inability to renew such arrangements or to find replacements on commercially reasonable terms, or other conditions beyond our control or the control of our franchisees.

A shortage or interruption in the availability of certain food products or supplies could increase costs and limit the availability of products critical to our franchisees’ restaurant operations, which in turn could lead to restaurant closures and/or a decrease in sales and therefore a reduction in royalty fees to us. In addition, failure by a key supplier or distributor to our franchisees to meet its service requirements could lead to a disruption of service or supply until a new supplier or distributor is engaged, and any disruption could have an adverse effect on our franchisees and therefore our business. See “Business—Supply Chain.”

An increase in food prices may have an adverse impact on our and our franchisees’ profit margins.

Our franchisees’ restaurants depend on reliable sources of large quantities of raw materials such as protein (including beef and poultry), cheese, oil, flour and vegetables (including potatoes and lettuce). Raw materials purchased for use in our franchisees’ restaurants are subject to price volatility caused by any fluctuation in aggregate supply and demand, or other external conditions, such as weather conditions or natural events or disasters that affect expected harvests of such raw materials. As a result, the historical prices of raw materials used in the operation of our franchisees’ restaurants have fluctuated. We cannot assure you that we or our franchisees will continue to be able to purchase raw materials at reasonable prices, or that prices of raw materials will remain stable in the future. In addition, a significant increase in gasoline prices could result in the imposition of fuel surcharges by our distributors.

Because our franchisees provide competitively priced food, we may not have the ability to pass through to customers the full amount of any commodity price increases. If we and our franchisees are unable to manage the cost of raw materials or to increase the prices of products proportionately, it may have an adverse impact on our and our franchisees’ profit margins and their ability to remain in business, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Food safety and foodborne illness concerns may have an adverse effect on our business.

Foodborne illnesses, such as E. coli, hepatitis A, trichinosis and salmonella, occur or may occur within our system from time to time. In addition, food safety issues such as food tampering, contamination and adulteration occur or may occur within our system from time to time. Any report or publicity linking one of our franchisee’s restaurants, or linking our competitors or our industry generally, to instances of foodborne illness or food safety issues could adversely affect our brands and reputations as well as our revenues and profits, and possibly lead to product liability claims, litigation and damages. If a customer of one of our franchisees’ restaurants becomes ill as a result of food safety issues, restaurants in our system may be temporarily closed, which would decrease our revenues. In addition, instances or allegations of foodborne illness or food safety issues, real or perceived, involving our franchised restaurants, restaurants of competitors, or suppliers or distributors (regardless of whether we use or have used those suppliers or distributors), or otherwise involving the types of food served at our franchisees’ restaurants, could result in negative publicity that could adversely affect our revenues or the sales of our franchisees. The occurrence of foodborne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, which could result in disruptions in our supply chain and/or lower margins for us and our franchisees.

Health concerns arising from outbreaks of viruses or other diseases may have an adverse effect on our business.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected by the outbreak of a widespread health epidemic. The occurrence of such an outbreak of an epidemic illness or other adverse public health developments could materially disrupt our business and operations. Such events could also significantly impact our industry and cause a temporary closure of restaurants, which would severely disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, viruses may be transmitted through human contact, and the risk of contracting viruses could cause employees or guests to avoid gathering in public places, which could adversely affect restaurant guest traffic or the ability to adequately staff franchised restaurants. We could also be adversely affected if jurisdictions in which our franchisees’ restaurants operate impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures or impose restrictions on operations of restaurants. Even if such measures are not implemented and a virus or other disease does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or health risk may affect our business.

New information or attitudes regarding diet and health could result in changes in regulations and consumer consumption habits that could adversely affect our results of operations.

Government regulation and consumer eating habits may impact our business as a result of changes in attitudes regarding diet and health or new information regarding the health effects of consuming certain menu offerings. These changes have resulted in, and may continue to result in, laws and regulations requiring us to disclose the nutritional content of our food offerings, and they have resulted, and may continue to result in, laws and regulations affecting permissible ingredients and menu offerings. For example, a number of states, counties and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to disclose to consumers certain nutritional information, or have enacted legislation restricting the use of certain types of ingredients in restaurants. These requirements may be different or inconsistent with requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (which we refer to as the “PPACA”), which establishes a uniform, federal requirement for certain restaurants to post nutritional information on their menus. Specifically, the PPACA requires chain restaurants with 20 or more locations operating under the same name and offering substantially the same menus to publish the total number of calories of standard menu items on menus and menu boards, along with a statement that puts this calorie information in the context of a total daily calorie intake. These inconsistencies could be challenging for us to comply with in an efficient manner. The PPACA also requires covered restaurants to provide to consumers, upon request, a written summary of detailed nutritional information for each standard menu item, and to provide a statement on menus and menu boards about the availability of this information upon request. An unfavorable report on, or reaction to, our menu ingredients, the size of our portions or the nutritional content of our menu items could negatively influence the demand for our products and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Compliance with current and future laws and regulations regarding the ingredients and nutritional content of our menu items may be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, if consumer health regulations or consumer eating habits change significantly, we may be required to modify or discontinue certain menu items, and we may experience higher costs associated with the implementation of those changes. We cannot predict the impact of the new nutrition labeling requirements under the PPACA until final regulations are promulgated. The risks and costs associated with nutritional disclosures on our menus could also impact our operations, particularly given differences among applicable legal requirements and practices within the restaurant industry with respect to testing and disclosure, ordinary variations in food preparation among our own restaurants, and the need to rely on the accuracy and completeness of nutritional information obtained from third-party suppliers.

Our business may be adversely impacted by changes in consumer discretionary spending and general economic conditions.

Purchases at our franchisees’ restaurants are generally discretionary for consumers and, therefore, our results of operations are susceptible to economic slowdowns and recessions. Our results of operations are dependent upon discretionary spending by consumers of our franchisees’ restaurants, which may be affected by general economic conditions globally or in one or more of the markets we serve. Some of the factors that impact discretionary consumer spending include unemployment rates, fluctuations in the level of disposable income, the price of gasoline, stock market performance and changes in the level of consumer confidence. These and other macroeconomic factors could have an adverse effect on sales at our franchisees’ restaurants, which could lead to an adverse effect on our profitability or development plans, and harm our financial condition and operating results.

Our expansion into international markets exposes us to a number of risks that may differ in each country where we have franchised restaurants.

We currently have franchised restaurants in Canada, China, UAE, the United Kingdom, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Panama, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Qatar and Tunisia, and plan to continue to grow internationally. Expansion in international markets may be affected by local economic and market as well as geopolitical conditions. Therefore, as we expand internationally, our franchisees may not experience the operating margins we expect, and our results of operations and growth may be materially and adversely affected. Our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected if global markets in which our franchised restaurants compete are affected by changes in political, economic or other factors. These factors, over which neither our franchisees nor we have control, may include:

recessionary or expansive trends in international markets;
changing labor conditions and difficulties in staffing and managing our foreign operations;
increases in the taxes we pay and other changes in applicable tax laws;
legal and regulatory changes, and the burdens and costs of our compliance with a variety of foreign laws;
changes in inflation rates;
changes in exchange rates and the imposition of restrictions on currency conversion or the transfer of funds;
difficulty in protecting our brand, reputation and intellectual property;
difficulty in collecting our royalties and longer payment cycles;
expropriation of private enterprises;
increases in anti-American sentiment and the identification of our brands as American brands;
political and economic instability; and
other external factors.

Our international operations subject us to risks that could negatively affect our business.

A significant portion of our franchised restaurants are operated in countries and territories outside of the United States, including in emerging markets, and we intend to continue expansion of our international operations. As a result, our business is increasingly exposed to risks inherent in international operations. These risks, which can vary substantially by country, include political instability, corruption and social and ethnic unrest, as well as changes in economic conditions (including consumer spending, unemployment levels and wage and commodity inflation), the regulatory environment, income and non-income based tax rates and laws, foreign exchange control regimes, consumer preferences and the laws and policies that govern foreign investment in countries where our franchised restaurants are operated. In addition, our franchisees do business in jurisdictions that may be subject to trade or economic sanction regimes. Any failure to comply with such sanction regimes or other similar laws or regulations could result in the assessment of damages, the imposition of penalties, suspension of business licenses, or a cessation of operations at our franchisees’ businesses, as well as damage to our and our brands’ images and reputations, all of which could harm our profitability.

Foreign currency risks and foreign exchange controls could adversely affect our financial results.

Our results of operations and the value of our foreign assets are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect reported earnings. More specifically, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies could have an adverse effect on our reported earnings. Our Canadian franchisees pay us franchise fees as a percentage of sales denominated in Canadian dollars, which are then converted to U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate. This exposes us to risk of an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar. There can be no assurance as to the future effect of any changes in currency exchange rates on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

We depend on key executive management.

We depend on the leadership and experience of our relatively small number of key executive management personnel, and in particular key executive management, particularly our Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Wiederhorn. The loss of the services of any of our executive management members could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects, as we may not be able to find suitable individuals to replace such personnel on a timely basis or without incurring increased costs, or at all. We do not maintain key man life insurance policies on any of our executive officers. We believe that our future success will depend on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. There is a high level of competition for experienced, successful personnel in our industry. Our inability to meet our executive staffing requirements in the future could impair our growth and harm our business.

Labor shortages or difficulty finding qualified employees could slow our growth, harm our business and reduce our profitability.

Restaurant operations are highly service oriented and our success depends in part upon our franchisees’ ability to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified employees, including restaurant managers and other crew members. The market for qualified employees in our industry is very competitive. Any future inability to recruit and retain qualified individuals may delay the planned openings of new restaurants by our franchisees and could adversely impact our existing franchised restaurants. Any such delays, material increases in employee turnover rate in existing franchised restaurants or widespread employee dissatisfaction could have a material adverse effect on our and our franchisees’ business and results of operations.

In addition, strikes, work slowdowns or other job actions may become more common in the United States. Although none of the employees employed by our franchisees are represented by a labor union or are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, in the event of a strike, work slowdown or other labor unrest, the ability to adequately staff our restaurants could be impaired, which could result in reduced revenue and customer claims, and may distract our management from focusing on our business and strategic priorities.

Changes in labor and other operating costs could adversely affect our results of operations.

An increase in the costs of employee wages, benefits and insurance (including workers’ compensation, general liability, property and health) could result from government imposition of higher minimum wages or from general economic or competitive conditions. In addition, competition for qualified employees could compel our franchisees to pay higher wages to attract or retain key crew members, which could result in higher labor costs and decreased profitability. Any increase in labor expenses, as well as increases in general operating costs such as rent and energy, could adversely affect our franchisees’ profit margins, their sales volumes and their ability to remain in business, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

A broader standard for determining joint employer status may adversely affect our business operations and increase our liabilities resulting from actions by our franchisees.

In 2015, the National Labor Relations Board (which we refer to as the “NLRB”) adopted a new and broader standard for determining when two or more otherwise unrelated employers may be found to be a joint employer of the same employees under the National Labor Relations Act. In addition, the general counsel’s office of the NLRB has issued complaints naming McDonald’s Corporation as a joint employer of workers at its franchisees for alleged violations of the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act. In June 2017, the U.S. Department of Labor announced the rescission of these guidelines. However, there can be no assurance that future changes in law, regulation or policy will cause us or our franchisees to be liable or held responsible for unfair labor practices, violations of wage and hour laws, or other violations or require our franchises to conduct collective bargaining negotiations regarding employees of our franchisees. Further, there is no assurance that we or our franchisees will not receive similar complaints as McDonald’s Corporation in the future, which could result in legal proceedings based on the actions of our franchisees. In such events, our operating expenses may increase as a result of required modifications to our business practices, increased litigation, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil liability.

We could be party to litigation that could adversely affect us by increasing our expenses, diverting management attention or subjecting us to significant monetary damages and other remedies.

We may become involved in legal proceedings involving consumer, employment, real estate related, tort, intellectual property, breach of contract, securities, derivative and other litigation. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits often seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss relating to such lawsuits may not be accurately estimated. Regardless of whether any such claims have merit, or whether we are ultimately held liable or settle, such litigation may be expensive to defend and may divert resources and management attention away from our operations and negatively impact reported earnings. With respect to insured claims, a judgment for monetary damages in excess of any insurance coverage could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Any adverse publicity resulting from these allegations may also adversely affect our reputation, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations.

In addition, the restaurant industry around the world has been subject to claims that relate to the nutritional content of food products, as well as claims that the menus and practices of restaurant chains have led to customer health issues, including weight gain and other adverse effects. These concerns could lead to an increase in the regulation of the content or marketing of our products. We may also be subject to such claims in the future and, even if we are not, publicity about these matters (particularly directed at the quick service and fast casual segments of the retail food industry) may harm our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in, or noncompliance with, governmental regulations may adversely affect our business operations, growth prospects or financial condition.

We and our franchisees are subject to numerous laws and regulations around the world. These laws change regularly and are increasingly complex. For example, we and our franchisees are subject to:

The Americans with Disabilities Act in the U.S. and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas.
The U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs matters such as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions, as well as family leave mandates and a variety of similar state laws that govern these and other employment law matters.
Laws and regulations in government mandated health care benefits such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Laws and regulations relating to nutritional content, nutritional labeling, product safety, product marketing and menu labeling.
Laws relating to state and local licensing.
Laws relating to the relationship between franchisors and franchisees.
Laws and regulations relating to health, sanitation, food, workplace safety, child labor, including laws prohibiting the use of certain “hazardous equipment” by employees younger than the age of 18 years of age, and fire safety and prevention.
Laws and regulations relating to union organizing rights and activities.
Laws relating to information security, privacy, cashless payments, and consumer protection.
Laws relating to currency conversion or exchange.
Laws relating to international trade and sanctions.
Tax laws and regulations.
Antibribery and anticorruption laws.
Environmental laws and regulations.
Federal and state immigration laws and regulations in the U.S.

Compliance with new or existing laws and regulations could impact our operations. The compliance costs associated with these laws and regulations could be substantial. Any failure or alleged failure to comply with these laws or regulations by our franchisees or indirectly by us could adversely affect our reputation, international expansion efforts, growth prospects and financial results or result in, among other things, litigation, revocation of required licenses, internal investigations, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil and criminal liability. Publicity relating to any such noncompliance could also harm our reputation and adversely affect our revenues.

Failure to comply with antibribery or anticorruption laws could adversely affect our business operations.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other similar applicable laws prohibiting bribery of government officials and other corrupt practices are the subject of increasing emphasis and enforcement around the world. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, agents, franchisees or other third parties will not take actions in violation of our policies or applicable law, particularly as we expand our operations in emerging markets and elsewhere. Any such violations or suspected violations could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial fines and significant investigation costs, and could also materially damage our reputation, brands, international expansion efforts and growth prospects, business and operating results. Publicity relating to any noncompliance or alleged noncompliance could also harm our reputation and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Tax matters, including changes in tax rates, disagreements with taxing authorities and imposition of new taxes could impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, such as payroll, sales, use, value added, net worth, property, withholding and franchise taxes in both the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions. We are also subject to regular reviews, examinations and audits by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (which we refer to as the “IRS”) and other taxing authorities with respect to such income and non-income based taxes inside and outside of the U.S. If the IRS or another taxing authority disagrees with our tax positions, we could face additional tax liabilities, including interest and penalties. Payment of such additional amounts upon final settlement or adjudication of any disputes could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

In addition, we are directly and indirectly affected by new tax legislation and regulation and the interpretation of tax laws and regulations worldwide. Changes in legislation, regulation or interpretation of existing laws and regulations in the U.S. and other jurisdictions where we are subject to taxation could increase our taxes and have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Conflict or terrorism could negatively affect our business.

We cannot predict the effects of actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, military action against any foreign state or group located in a foreign state or heightened security requirements on local, regional, national or international economies or consumer confidence. Such events could negatively affect our business, including by reducing customer traffic or the availability of commodities.

Risks Related to Our Company and Our Organizational Structure

We are included in FCCG’s consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and, as a result, may be liable for any shortfall in FCCG’s federal income tax payments

For so long as FCCG continues to own at least 80% of the total voting power and value of our capital stock, we will be included in FCCG’s consolidated group for federal income tax purposes. By virtue of its controlling ownership and the Tax Sharing Agreement that we anticipate entering into with FCCG, FCCG effectively controls all of our tax decisions. Moreover, notwithstanding the Tax Sharing Agreement, federal tax law provides that each member of a consolidated group is jointly and severally liable for the group’s entire federal income tax obligation. Thus, to the extent FCCG or other members of the group fail to make any federal income tax payments required of them by law, we are liable for the shortfall. Similar principles generally apply for income tax purposes in some state, local and foreign jurisdictions.

We are controlled by FCCG, whose interests may differ from those of our public stockholders.

FCCG controls approximately 80% of the combined voting power of our Common Stock and will, for the foreseeable future, have significant influence over corporate management and affairs and be able to control virtually all matters requiring stockholder approval. FCCG is able to, subject to applicable law, elect a majority of the members of our Board of Directors and control actions to be taken by us, including amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and approval of significant corporate transactions, including mergers and sales of substantially all of our assets. It is possible that the interests of FCCG may in some circumstances conflict with our interests and the interests of our other stockholders, including you. For example, FCCG may have different tax positions from us, especially in light of the Tax Sharing Agreement, that could influence its decisions regarding whether and when to dispose of assets, whether and when to incur new or refinance existing indebtedness. In addition, the determination of future tax reporting positions, the structuring of future transactions and the handling of any future challenges by any taxing authority to our tax reporting positions may take into consideration FCCG’s tax or other considerations, which may differ from the considerations of us or our other stockholders.

Our anti-takeover provisions could prevent or delay a change in control of our company, even if such change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws as well as provisions of Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company, even if such change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:

net operating loss protective provisions, which require that any person wishing to become a “5% shareholder” (as defined in our certificate of incorporation) must first obtain a waiver from our board of directors, and any person that is already a “5% shareholder” of ours cannot make any additional purchases of our stock without a waiver from our board of directors;
authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our Board of Directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings or amend our bylaws;
providing for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms;
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and
establishing advance notice and duration of ownership requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. In addition, because our Board of Directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team.

In addition, the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, to which we are subject, prohibits us, except under specified circumstances, from engaging in any mergers, significant sales of stock or assets or business combinations with any stockholder or group of stockholders who owns at least 15% of our common stock.

We may issue shares of preferred stock in the future, which could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our Common Stock, which could depress the price of our Common Stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue one or more series of preferred stock. Our board of directors has the authority to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of the shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the rights of our Common Stock. The potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discourage bids for our Common Stock at a premium to the market price, and materially and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Common Stock.

The provision of our certificate of incorporation requiring exclusive venue in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware for certain types of lawsuits may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the bylaws or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine will have to be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware. Although we believe this provision benefits us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, the provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.

A limited public trading market may cause volatility in the price of our Common Stock.

There can be no assurance that our Common Stock will continue to be quoted on NASDAQ or that a meaningful, consistent and liquid trading market will develop. As a result, our stockholders may not be able to sell or liquidate their holdings in a timely manner or at the then-prevailing trading price of our Common Stock. In addition, sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock, or the perception that such sales might occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock and our stock price may decline substantially in a short time and our stockholders could suffer losses or be unable to liquidate their holdings.

If our operating and financial performance in any given period does not meet the guidance that we provide to the public, our stock price may decline.

We may provide public guidance on our expected operating and financial results for future periods. Any such guidance will be comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in our public filings and public statements. Our actual results may not always be in line with or exceed any guidance we have provided, especially in times of economic uncertainty. If our operating or financial results for a particular period do not meet any guidance we provide or the expectations of investment analysts or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our Common Stock may decline as well.

Our ability to pay regular dividends to our stockholders is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and may be limited by our holding company structure and applicable provisions of Delaware law.

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, we expect to pay cash dividends to the holders of our Common Stock on a quarterly basis. Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, decrease the amount or frequency of dividends or discontinue the payment of dividends entirely. In addition, as a holding company, we will be dependent upon the ability of our operating subsidiaries to generate earnings and cash flows and distribute them to us so that we may pay dividends to our stockholders. Our ability to pay dividends will be subject to our consolidated operating results, cash requirements and financial condition, the applicable provisions of Delaware law which may limit the amount of funds available for distribution to our stockholders, our compliance with covenants and financial ratios related to existing or future indebtedness, and our other agreements with third parties. In addition, each of the companies in the corporate chain must manage its assets, liabilities and working capital in order to meet all of its cash obligations, including the payment of dividends or distributions.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit   Incorporated By Reference to Filed

Number

 Description Form Exhibit Filing Date 

Herewith

3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, effective October 19, 2017.       X
4.1 Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated October 20, 2017, issued to Tripoint Global Equities, LLC.       X
10.1 Contribution Agreement, dated October 20, 2017, between the Company and Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.       X
10.2 Tax Sharing Agreement, dated October 20, 2017, between the Company and Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.       X
10.3 Voting Agreement, dated October 20, 2017, between the Company and Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.       X
10.4 Promissory Note, dated October 20, 2017, issued by the Company to Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.       X
10.5 Intercompany Promissory Note, dated October 20, 2017, issued by Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. to the Company.       X
10.6 Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated October 20, 2017, between the Company and each director and executive officer. 1-A 6.3 09/06/2017  
10.7 Selling Agency Agreement, dated October 20, 2017, between the Company and Tripoint Global Equities, LLC. 1-A 1.1 10/03/2017  
10.8 Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (Hurricane AMT, LLC), dated November 14, 2017, between the Company and Gama Group LLC, Salient Point Trust, Satovsky Enterprises, LLC, Mapes Holdings LLC and Martin O’Dowd. 8-K 2.1 11/17/2017  
31.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       X
31.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       X
32.1 Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       X (Furnished)
101.INS 

XBRL Instance Document

       

X

(Furnished)

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document       

X

(Furnished)

101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document       

X

(Furnished)

101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document       

X

(Furnished)

101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document       

X

(Furnished)

101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document       

X

(Furnished)

Exhibit
Number
Incorporated By Reference to
Filed
Herewith
DescriptionFormExhibitFiling Date
10.1Letter Agreement, dated March 30, 2022, by and between FAT Brands Inc. and Kenneth J. Kuick8-K10.14/5/2022
31.1X
31.2X
32.1X
101.INSInline XBRL Instance DocumentX (Furnished)
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX (Furnished)
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX (Furnished)
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentX (Furnished)
27

37
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentX (Furnished)
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX (Furnished)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

FAT BRANDS INC.
December 4, 2017May 10, 2022By/s/Andrew A. Wiederhorn Kenneth J. Kuick
Andrew A. WiederhornKenneth J. Kuick
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
December 4, 2017By/s/ Ron Roe
Ron Roe
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

28