UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number 0-7092

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ YES ☐ NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒YES ☐ NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ YES ☒ NO

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 300,000,000shares of Common Stock, no par value, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2021.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

As of and For the Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGE IN EQUITY

For the SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, and 2020

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, continued

(amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Operations

Reliability, Inc. is a leading provider of employer of record and temporary media and information technology (“IT”) staffing services that operates, along with its wholly owned subsidiary, The Maslow Media Group, Inc (“MMG”), (collectively, “Reliability” or the “Company”), primarily within the United States of America in four industry segments: Employer of Record (“EOR”), Recruiting and Staffing, Permanent Direct Placements, and Video and Multimedia Production which provides script to screen media talent. EOR, which is a unique workforce management solution, represented 80.7% of the revenue in 2020 and 78.5% of second quarter 2021 revenue. Our Staffing segment provides skilled field talent on a nationwide basis for Media, IT and finance and accounting client partner projects. Our Staffing previously included revenue derived from permanent placements which was a rare occurrence. Insegment occasionally received requests for (direct) placements. Because of an uptick in direct hire requests in 2021, factoring in the second quarter,much higher margins that business derives, MMG decided to add Permanent (Direct) Placement as a segment when new clients began requesting the Company source candidates for permanent hire on a regular basis. The Company had one such placement in the second quarter.stand-alone business segment. Video Production involves assembling and providing crews for special projects that can last anywhere from a week to 6 months.

Reliability was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas in 1953, but the then principal business of the Company started in 1971 was closed down in 2007. The Company completed a reverse merger with MMG (the “Merger”) on October 29, 2019.

Company Background

Vivos Holdings LLC, the previous sole shareholder of MMG and their transferees who were issued shares of Reliability Common Stock include Naveen Doki, Silvija Valleru, Shirisha Janumpally (through Judos Trust and Federal Systems), and Kalyan Pathuri (through Igly Trust) together own approximately 84% of the issued and outstanding shares of Reliability Common Stock. Vivos Holdings, LLC and Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Mr. Doki have outstanding notes with MMG that date back to acquisition of MMG in November 2016 (See Note 8)9) (collectively “Vivos Debtors”).

Mrs. Janumpally, Mr. Doki, and Mr. Pathuri also have common ownership combinations in a number of other entities [Vivos Holdings, LLC. Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), Vivos Holdings, Inc., Vivos Group, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC., and Federal Systems, LLC], (collectively referred to herein as “Vivos Group”).

On December 1, 2019, the Company acquired the customer contracts and trade receivables and assumed certain liabilities of Intelligent Quality Solutions, Inc. (“IQS”). IQS operates as a division of MMG.

On or about February 17, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Debtors.Debtors (“Vivos Default Claim”) See(See Note 6.7).

On or about May 6, 2020, the Vivos Debtors and other Vivos Group members, specifically. Kaylan Pathuri (“Pathuri”), Judos Trust by Shirisha Janumpally, its trustee (“Judos”) and Igly Trust by Kaylan Pathuri, its trustee, (“Igly”) responded to the Vivos Default Claim with a Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint (the “Vivos Default Counterclaim”).

On June 5, 2020, Reliability commenced an arbitration seeking to address purported merger violations before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) in New York, New York (the “Merger Arbitration”), as permitted by. The remedy for the Merger Agreement against Mr. Doki; Mrs. Valleru; Mrs. Janumpally (individuallynature and in her capacity as trusteeextent of Judos Trust); Mr. Pathuri (individually in his capacity as trusteethe alleged violations, per the merger agreement, is the forfeiture of Igly Trust) and Federal Systems (the “Merger Respondents”). Although the Merger Respondents filed a counterclaim, Merger Respondents have not paid the AAA’s fees, and ultimately refused to participate in the arbitration. Thereafter, Reliability petitioned the state court in New York to compel arbitration, but this action was removed to federal court, where it has been pending for several months awaiting court action. The Company is seeking damages which if granted will likely be the remedy set forth within the Merger agreement which is primarily the relinquishment in whole or in part shares of Company Common Stock received by the Merger Respondents in connection with the Merger.Vivos Group shares.

On December 23, 2020, after an evidentiary hearingSeptember 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Naveen Doki, M.D., and his affiliates and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, a judge denied a motion by Vivos Holdings, LLC, VREH, Doki, Kaylan Pathuri (“Pathuri”), Judos Trust by Shirisha Janumpally, its trustee (“Judos”) and Igly Trust by Kaylan Pathuri, its trustee, (“Igly”) to compel a shareholder meeting based on the facts presented at trial.American Arbitration Association. The judge also commented that, based on the evidence presented, management was performing its fiduciary duties to protect the Company despite adverse circumstances. This same judge has been assigned to preside over a full trial regarding Company’s lawsuit to enforce the repayment of notes and the Vivos Group counterclaim, over a two-week period starting on October 4, 2021, absent any COVID-19 disruptions that may affect scheduling.

On May 27, 2021, MMG filed a 941X refund request for $1,440 after determining it’s eligibilityAgreements call for the Employee Retention Credit (“ERC”)stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland (See Note 7).

On June 10, 2021, MMG received notification by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) of forgiveness of its PPP 2020 Loan totaling $5,216. The forgiveness included the deferred interest of $59 totaling $5,275 in principal and interest.

On August 9, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Doki, Valleru, Pathuri, Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, asserting that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and potentially committed fraud in connection with the Merger.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Basis of presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all wholly owned divisions, including its 100% owned subsidiary, MMG. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Operating results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of financial results for the full year. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. In preparing these unaudited consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements relatedrelate to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, recoverability of notes receivable, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, loss contingencies, allocation of purchase price in connection with business combinations, valuation allowances for deferred income taxes, and the assumptions used for web site development cost classifications.

For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Concentration of Credit Risk

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, 24.126.7% of revenue came from AT&T Services, Inc. (inclusive of its DirecTV division) (“AT&T”), 16.315.7% from Goldman Sachs, 13.5% from Morgan Stanley, and 11.212.8% from Janssen Pharmaceuticals (which includes workforce partners Ortho McNeil and Johnson & Johnson)., and 11% from Morgan Stanley. Combined, this totals 66.4% of revenue. AT&T, Goldman Sachs, Janssen, and Morgan Stanley and Janssen accounted for 27.427.6%, 8.68.8%, 5.810.9% and 11.35.7%, respectively, in revenue for the same time period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2020. No other client has exceeded 10% of revenues.revenues in 2021.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 2. LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN

Going Concern

Management considers on a regular basis, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The factors which have impacted the business and our liquidity are;

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

All these conditions noted and factored in above, most notably the adverse impact of COVID 19 on sales andbut from a scenario where the presumptionprevailing operational view there is all debts come due with an inability to raise cash through equity given the unavailability of unissued authorized shares, raisestill substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.concern as the underlying business has yet to recover from COVID-19 with revenue levels down as much as 35% from 2019 standards. There is also the risk that the arbitration (see Note 7) outcome is not in the Company’s favor, and or the $4.9M in notes receivable is not realized in a timely fashion. As far as cash equivalents, once the $3,221 in ERC is fully refunded, the Company will have sufficient capital resources, but these are based on government stimulus programs. Therefore, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in managing the impact of the foregoing or its ability to maintain sufficient liquidity over a period of time that will allow it to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liability that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ongoing liquidity position is facing pressures due to the loss of business resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as ongoing outside legal costs related to Doki Group disputes and increased pressure to make cash payments for Doki group MCA obligations, which ultimately took place on July 21, 2021, (See Note 10: Subsequent Events) pursuant to the Settlement Agreements (filed as exhibits 10.4, 10.5 and 10.6 the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2019), prior to the Company’s anticipated liquidation of the shares of Company Common Stock pledged pursuant to the Agreement for the Contingent Liquidation of the Common Stock of Reliability Incorporated (as successor in interest to MMG Media Group, Inc.), dated October 28, 2019 (the “Liquidation Agreement”) (filed as exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2019). The Vivos Group that are the counterparties to the Liquidation Agreement are not cooperating with the Company to liquidate the shares subject thereto as contemplated thereby. No assurance can be given that the Company will return to its pre-pandemic revenue levels and how long it will take to enforce the requirements of the Liquidation Agreement. As a result, the Company facescould face hurdles to maintaining sufficient liquidity to continue to operate, in which case the Company might be forced to liquidate or seek to reorganize under applicable bankruptcy statutes.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company is quoted on the OTC Marketplace under the symbol “RLBY”.

NOTE 3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts Receivable can be broken down as follows

SCHEDULE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

NOTE 3.4. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, to replace the incurred loss methodology with an expected credit loss model that requires consideration of a broader range of information to estimate credit losses over the lifetime of the asset, including current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts in addition to historical loss information, to determine expected credit losses. Pooling of assets with similar risk characteristics and the use of a loss model are also required. Also, in April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, to clarify the inclusion of recoveries of trade receivables previously written off when estimating an allowance for credit losses. The amendments in this update were required to be applied using the modified retrospective method with an adjustment to retained earnings and were effective for us beginning with fiscal year 2020, including interim periods. The adoption of the amendments in this update as of January 1, 2020, did not have a material impact on our accounts receivable, retained earnings, as well as our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework— Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to improve the fair value measurement reporting of financial instruments. The amendments in this update require, among other things, added disclosure of the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this update eliminate, among other things, disclosure of the reasons for and amounts of transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and an entity’s valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this update were effective for us

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

beginning with fiscal year 2020. Retrospective application is required for all amendments in this update except the added disclosures, which should be applied prospectively. The adoption of the amendments in this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract, to provide additional guidance on the accounting for costs of implementing cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts. The amendments in this update require the capitalization of implementation costs during the application development stage of such hosting arrangements and amortization of the expense over the term of the arrangement, including any option to extend reasonably certain to be exercised or option to terminate reasonably certain not to be exercised. Capitalized implementation costs and amortization thereof are also required to be classified in the same line item in the statements of financial position, operations and cash flows associated with the hosting service fees. The amendments in this update were effective for us beginning with fiscal year 2020. Entities may select retrospective or prospective application to all implementation costs incurred after the adoption date. We selected prospective application to all implementation costs incurred after the adoption date. The adoption of the amendments in this update did not have a material impact on our property and equipment, net and results of operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04 Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)—Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, that provides optional relief to applying reference rate reform to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which will be discontinued by the end of 2021. Also, in January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01 Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)—Scope, to clarify that cash flow hedges are eligible for certain optional expedients and exceptions for the application of subsequent assessment methods to assume perfect effectiveness as previously presented in ASU 2020-04. The amendments in this update are effective for us immediately and may be applied through December 31, 2022. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12 Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, to remove certain exceptions and improve consistency of application, including, among other things, requiring that an entity reflect the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date. The amendment in this update is effective for us beginning with fiscal year 2021, with early adoption permitted. Most amendments within the standard are required to be applied on a prospective basis, while certain amendments must be applied on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis. The adoption of the amendments in this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-10 Codification Improvements, to make incremental improvements to U.S. GAAP and address stakeholder suggestions, including, among other things, clarifying that the requirement to provide comparative information in the financial statements extends to the corresponding disclosures section. The amendment in this update is effective for the Company beginning with fiscal year 2021, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively and at the beginning of the period that includes the adoption date. The adoption of the amendments in this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. An entity no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The FASB also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this update will be effective for the Company beginning with fiscal year 2023, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of the amendments in this update is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company does not believe any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncement, if adopted, would have a material effect on its present or future consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 4.5. DEBT

On June 10, 2021, the SBA notified MMG that it’s Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan of $5,216 issued in May of 2020 had been forgiven along with $59in SBA calculated deferred interest. This eliminated the long-term debt on the Company’s books, leaving only the $103 in federal income tax as explained in Tax Liabilities portion below. The Company recorded this forgiveness as a component of other income on the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations.

Convertible Debt

The Company had notes payable in the amount of $890 as of December 31, 2019, pursuant to a convertible debt offering that MMG commenced June 13, 2019. Pursuant to this agreement, MMG issued to each individual a warrant for 0.5 shares of Company Common Stock and a convertible promissory note of same date in the initial principal amount of $50,$50, in exchange for $50. The notes bore interest at 12% per year with the balance becoming due within 1 year from the issuance date unless earlier converted into shares of Company Common Stock upon the issuance by Reliability of Company Common Stock for gross proceeds of at least $5,000. Since no conversion occurred, the notes were paid in full as they became due over a 3-month period between June 2020 and September 2020.

Warrants can only be redeemable if the proceeds of $5,000 are secured within 5 years of note issuance, which expires correspondingly to each note between June and October 2024.

Tax Liabilities

When MMG was initially acquired by Vivos Holdings, LLC in December 2016, MMG’s corporate status was changed from an S Corp to a C Corp due to its new ownership structure. This triggered an accelerated tax event, a $215 estimated annual impact per year for four years, that MMG ishas been working with the IRS to paypay. .As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, the tax liability was $921,030 compared to $292as of December 31, 2020. The Company also has accrued current incremental income taxes of $669 1,075 YTD, $396 of which was recorded in Q3, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, relating to its current operations.

Factoring Facilities

Triumph Business Capital

On November 4, 2016, the MMG entered into a factoring and security agreement with Triumph Business Capital (“Triumph”TBC”). Pursuant to the agreement, MMG received advances on its accounts receivable (i.e., invoices) through TriumphTBC to fund growth and operations. The proceeds of this agreement were used to pay operating costs of the business which include employee salaries, vendor payments and overhead expenses. On January 5, 2018, the agreement was amended to lower the factoring fee and interest rate for a term of one year. The agreement was amended again on January 19, 2018, to increase the maximum advance rate to $5,500. In January 2020, a new agreement was negotiated with Triumph lowering advance rate from 18 basis points to 15 and the interest rate from prime plus 2.5% to prime plus2%. The amount of an invoice eligible for sale to Triumph went from 90% to 93%. The agreement which previously renewed annually, is now month to month. MMG continues to be obligated to meet certain financial covenants in respect to invoicing and reserve account balance.

In accordance with the agreement, a reserve amount is required for the total unpaid balance of all purchased accounts multiplied by a percentage equal to the difference between one hundred percent and the advanced rate percentage. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, the required amount was 10%. Any excess of the reserve amount is paid to MMG on a weekly basis, as requested. If a reserve shortfall exists for a period of ten-days, MMG is required to make payment to the financial institution for the shortage.

Accounts receivable (A/R) were sold with full recourse. Proceeds from the sale of receivables were $1,131 1,756For for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, compared to $2,450 10,175in the same period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2020.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Maslow’s outstanding balance with TBC as of September 30, 2021, was $939 and $2,999 on December 31, 2020.

The Factoring Facilities are collateralized by substantially all the assets of MMG. In the event of a default, the Factor may demand that the Company repurchase the receivable or debit the reserve account. Total finance line fees for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, and 2020 comparatively totaled $1615 and $3930, respectively.

NOTE 5.6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY (“VIE”)

In December 2019, the Company’s executive management learned that prior to the Merger, in January 2017, one of the Company’s related parties, on behalf of MMG, executed a guarantee of obligations of Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), under a mortgage loan for the purchase of the property at 22 Baltimore Rd., Rockville, Maryland. MMG leased this space on market terms. MMG challenges its status as a guarantor on the building.

Although the Company has neither any decision-making authority over VREH, nor financial interest in the operations of VREH, the Company was required to consolidate its financial statements with those of VREH as it was considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As a result of the Company terminating the lease on April 30, 2020, VREH was no longer to be considered a VIE after April 30, 2020.

The potential financial exposure to loss as a guarantor could equal all the book value of the related party mortgage loan payable, a total of approximately $1,7601,734 as of December 31, 2020,June 30, 2021, (the latest information made available to the Company), with $12621 dueunpaid in 2021.2021 as VREH is currently a few monthswas behind on two of their mortgage payments. The loan is deemed to be in default with outstanding taxes due of $7, a 2019 DSC ratio violation, failure to submit updated financials, and subsequent liens without bank written consent for $250 to another Vivos Group creditor. To date, the Company has not been called on for any loan repayment guarantee. The Company believes the building valuation is at or near the current mortgage amount.

NOTE 6. 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is engaged from time to time in legal matters and proceedings arising out of its normal course of business, and currently also is involved in litigation outside of the normal course of business. The Company establishes a liability related to its legal proceedings and claims when it has determined that it is probable that the Company has incurred a liability and the related amount can be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines that an obligation is reasonably possible, the Company will, if material, disclose the nature of the loss contingency and the estimated range of possible loss, or include a statement that no estimate of the loss can be made.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On September 28, 2018, Credit Cash filed a complaint against MMG, Vivos Holdings LLC, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Dr. Doki, Dr. Valleru (the “Credit Cash Defendants”) and other defendants in the United States Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland for the District of New Jersey for, among other things, breach of contract of the MMG and HCRN Credit Facilities and their respective guaranties in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement (the “Credit Cash Complaint”). On October 30, 2018, Credit Cash filed a motion to intervene in an action pending in New York State, Monroe County, filed by HCRN and LE Finance, LLC against the Credit Cash Defendants, and other defendants (“NY State Action”). On December 10, 2018, the Credit Cash Defendants entered into a settlement agreement for the purpose of settling certain claims related to the Credit Cash Complaint only. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, certain repayment terms were agreed upon between Credit Cash and the Credit Cash Defendants, but Credit Cash did not relinquish the right to pursue any claims related to the NY State Action, nor to pursue any remedies against any of the Credit Cash Defendants in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement. Naveen Doki, Kalyan Pathuri, Shirisha Janumpally, and Federal Systems, LLC, (“Credit Cash Vivos Group”) executed and delivered to MMG that certain Agreement for the Contingent Liquidation of the Common Stock of MMG , dated as of October 28, 2019 (the “Liquidation Agreement”), pursuant to which the Credit Cash Vivos Group pledged to MMG the shares of Company Common Stock they received in the Merger to provide the capital required to satisfy the Credit Cash Defendants’ obligations under the Settlement Agreements. Members of the Credit Cash Vivos Group misrepresented upon the execution of the Liquidation Agreement the status of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement, which were, in fact, then in default. To date the Credit Cash Vivos Group have not cooperated with the Company to monetize those shares as contemplated by the Liquidation Agreement. The Company will take appropriate action to enforce its rights under the Liquidation Agreement, which actions will be dictated in part by the outcome of the Merger Arbitration wherein relinquishment of shares for certain claims may be an applied remedy. On or about March 16, 2020, Credit Cash entered its New Jersey confession of judgment with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On October 9, 2018, MMG was named as a defendant along with six other defendants, all of which are entities related to the Vivos Group, in an Affidavit of Confession of Judgment (COJ)(“COJ”) filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in relation to a case brought by Hop Capital, wherein the defendants collectively agree to pay a sum of $400 to Hop Capital. The claim brought by Hop Capital against the defendants in this case is in relation to a Merchant Agreement dated October 4, 2018; an agreement to which MMG was not a party. As such, MMG contends that being named in the COJ as a defendant was made in error and is currently seeking to have its name removed from the COJ. As of MarchOctober 2021, we have not been contacted again on this matter, nor have we been notified on any developments The Company will defend itself from this case.

On or about February 17, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Naveen Doki (“Vivos Debtors”), to enforce MMG’s rights under certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the Vivos Debtors (“Vivos Default Claim”). The case is proceeding. Although there are no certainties or guarantees, the Company believes that it will be granted a judgment in its favor as it vigorously pursues this litigation.This was settled on October 1st, 2021 with both parties mutually releasing each other of any claims

On February 28, 2020, Healthcare Resource Network, LLC (“HCRN”) filed a complaint against MMG in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland alleging that Maslow participated with members of the Vivos Group to financially harm the plaintiff. The plaintiff has not specified any alleged damage caused by MMG and the Company believes any claims are without merit. The Company will defend itself from this case.

On March 16, 2020, CC Business Solutions, a division of Credit Cash NJ, LLC domesticated a foreign judgement in the Montgomery County Circuit Court system against Health Care Resources Network (“HCRN”),HCRN, MMG, Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Naveen Doki and Silvija Valleru. This foreign judgement relates to Vivos Holdings adding Maslow Media GroupMMG as a guarantor on a loan made to Health Care Resources NetworkHCRN which is in default by HCRN and Vivos Holdings. Foreign judgement total is $820. This judgement relates to the default on the settlement agreement dated December 10, 2018, referenced above in the Credit Cash Complaint.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On May 5, 2020, Libertas Funding, LLC (“Libertas”) domesticated a foreign judgement in the Montgomery County Circuit Court system against HCRN, MMG, Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Vivos IT, LLC, Vivos Global Services, LLC, Alliance Micro, Inc. and Naveen Doki. This foreign judgement from the State of New York relates to loans the Vivos Group took out by adding MMG additional collateral. This loan is currently in default. Foreign Judgement total is $229. Maslow settled with Libertas/Kinetic (both judgements) this summer for $475 (See last 2 paragraphs below).

On May 5, 2020, Kinetic Direct Funding (Kinetic”) domesticated a foreign judgement in the Montgomery County Circuit Court system against HCRN, MMG, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals, Alliance Micro, Inc. and Naveen Doki. This foreign judgement from the State of New York relates to loans the Vivos Group took out by adding MMG as additional collateral. This loan is currently in default. Foreign Judgement total is $579. There were 4 total loans in the settlement, with the 3 domesticated judgements in Montgomery County circuit court relating to MMG totaling $1,038. Maslow settled with Libertas/Kinetic (both judgements) this summer for $475 (See last 2 paragraphs below).

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On or about May 6, 2020, the Vivos Debtors and other Vivos Group members, specifically. Kaylan Pathuri, (“Pathuri”), Judos, Trust by Shirisha Janumpally, its trustee (“Judos”) and Igly Trust by Kaylan Pathuri, its trustee, (“Igly”) responded to the Vivos Default Claim with a Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint (thethe “Vivos Default Counterclaim”).Counterclaim. The Company believescontinues to believe that the Counterclaim has no merit. The Company continuesmerit and had planned to vigorously defend itself and its indemnified officers, directors and other parties as permitted by the Company’s organizational documents. Trialdocuments, when a trial on this matter iswas scheduled to begin on October 4, 2021.2021, but both parties agreed on September 7^th, 2021, to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland, which calls for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation. The agreement provides 150 days to resolve all pending matters through binding arbitration in Maryland.

On or about June 5, 2020, the Company submitted a Claimant’s Notice of Intention to Arbitrate and Demand for Arbitration (the “Merger Arbitration”) with the American Arbitration Association in New York, and to the Respondents thereto: Naveen Doki; Silvija Valleru; Shirisha Janumpally (individually and in her capacity as trustee of Judos Trust); Kalyan Pathuri (individually in his capacity as trustee of Igly Trust) and Federal Systems (the “Merger Respondents”). The Merger Arbitration alleges that the Merger Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and may have committed fraud in connection with the Merger. The Company is seeking damages, which if granted will likely be the remedy set forth within the Merger Agreement which is in whole or in part shares of Company Common Stock received by the Merger Respondents in connection with the Merger. The Company has brought a motion to compel the Arbitration which is currently being decided by the Federal Courts in New York, but the Respondents countered with a motion to dismiss Reliability’s Petition to Compel Arbitration to the Federal Courts in New York. The Company believes a strong basis forOn August 4, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, denied the Respondents motion exists, but no assurance can be given that it will be granted. Regardless, the Company intends to pursue claims under the Merger Agreement in whatever venue is required.dismiss.

On June 12, 2020, Igly Trust, a Vivos entity, asked the Texas court for an injunction requiring the Company to provide a shareholder list and to hold a shareholder meeting. On October 20, 2020, the Texas court denied the injunction but, incongruously, dismissed all the Vivos plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Company appealed the dismissal because the court had jurisdiction over Igly Trust once it made affirmative claims in Texas and because the Court’s order denying the injunction is an important precedent for establishing that the directors under Texas law retain control of shareholder lists and determining the timing of shareholder meetings.

On December 23, 2020, at a hearing in the Maryland Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, a motion by the Vivos Group to compel a shareholder meeting was summarily dismissed. This same judge is scheduled to preside over a full trial on the Vivos Default Claim and Vivos Default Counterclaim in October 2021, absent any disruptions that could affect scheduling. On January 20, 2021, Defendants and Counter/Third-Party Plaintiffs, Vivos, Holdings, LLC (“Vivos”), Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (��VREH”), Dr. NaveenVREH, Doki, (“Doki”), Kaylan Pathuri, (“Pathuri”), Igly, Trust (“Igly”), Judos, Trust (“Judos”), by counsel, filed a Notice of Appeal on the dismissal.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data) However, the deadline to pursue the appeal lapsed absent additional filings by the Vivos Group.

On July 21, 2021, Maslow settled the obligation which with it had been committed by Vivos Holdings, LLC in July 2018, with Libertas and Kinetic for $475. The agreement which included $100 in legal fees, released MMG from all claims judgements and obligation against MMG but did not release Naveen Doki, Silvija Valleru, Judos Trust, Igly Trust, Srinivas Kalidindi, Shirisha Janumpally, Federal Systems, Kalyan Pathuri, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals Inc., Alliance Micro Inc. VivosViv’s IT LLC, Vivos Global Holdings LLC, Vivos Acquisitions LLC, or Vivos Holdings.fromHoldings from the remaining obligation. This debt belonged to Vivos Holdings LLC, and the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement, (See Note 2) had been created as a safeguard to shelter MMG should Vivos default, which actually transpired prior to the merger closing in October 2019.

Maslow felt compelled to settle Vivos’ Holdings at this time due to 1) added pressure placed by Libertas to collect a balance that now exceeded $1,700, 2) a desire to clear liens against the Company to improve its credit status, and 3) its ability to negotiate a much lower and separate settlement.

Maslow is pursuing remedy for the $475 payment to Libertas with the Vivos Group through the arbitration process. In the meantime, the $475 has been added the Vivos Debtor balance which as of September 30, 2021, is $4,944.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 7.8. EQUITY

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 300,000,000 shares of common stock, with 0 par value. All authorized shares of Company Common Stock are issued and outstanding.

NOTE 8.9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Stock Purchase Agreement

On November 9, 2016, Vivos Holdings LLC, the former owner of MMG, acquired 100% of MMG through a stock acquisition exchange for a purchase price of $1,750, of which: (i) $1,400 was paid at settlement with proceeds from MMG and (ii) a promissory note to pay the remaining $350 (“Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement”). The promissory note was to be paid in twenty-four equal installments, including interest at 4.5%, in the amount of approximately $15, commencing six months after closing, with the last payment on March 1, 2019. These payments were paid by the MMG on behalf of the Vivos. Vivos subsequently entered into a promissory note receivable with the MMG, described below, for the full stock purchase price. No payment has ever been made against this note.

Notes Receivable

The Company has notes receivable from Vivos Holdings, LLC and VREH, a member of Vivos Group, both related party affiliates due to their ownership percentage in the Company. In January 2021, MMG began applying the legal rate of interest which per Virginia statute is 8.0% on two of the three defaulted notes receivable below, which were so eligible.

In connection with the Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement, on November 15, 2016, MMG executed a promissory note receivable with Vivos Holdings LLC in the amount of $1,400. As defined by the Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement, the loan consists of two periods, whereby the first period from November 15, 2016, until September 30, 2018, no principal or interest payments were required. Interest would accrue monthly and a new loan in the amount of $1,773 would be subject to a second loan period. During the second loan period, interest shall be paid in 20 equal consecutive payments, quarterly. Principal plus any unpaid interest is due September 20, 2023. Interest during both loan periods accrues at a rate of 2.5%. Additionally, monthly payments of $15 are made on behalf of Vivos Holdings, Inc. to the seller by MMG. These payments, plus any other payments made by MMG on behalf of Vivos Holdings, Inc,LLC, are added to the principal balance of the promissory note receivable (“Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement Note Receivable”). In 2018, all quarterly interest payments to be made in phase 2 were offset by the management fees due to Vivos Holdings.

In January 2021, MMG began applying the legal rate of interest which per Virginia statute is 8.0% on two of the three defaulted notes receivable, which were eligible. Only the $750September 5, 2019, note is not eligible for a default rate of interest but is eligible for recovery of legal fees. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, the total outstanding balance was $2,767which includes accrued interest receivable of $7055. The actual funds (additional eligible interest and legal fees) sought may be greater than what is represented herein per GAAP.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On November 15, 2017, MMG executed an intercompany promissory note receivable with VREH in the amount of $772. As defined by the agreement, the loan consists of two periods, whereby the first period from November 15, 2017, until JuneSeptember 30, 2018, no principal or interest payments are required. During the first loan period, interest accrued monthly and a new loan amount of $781 will be subject to a second loan period. During the second period, interest is payable in 20 equal consecutive installments and the principal balance plus accrued and unpaid interest is due JuneSeptember 30, 2023. Interest during both periods accrues at a rate of 3.5% annually. In 2018, all quarterly interest payments to be made in Phase 2 were offset by the management fees due to Vivos Holdings, LLC. In addition, principal payments totaling $30 were made by the Vivos Group. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, the total outstanding balance was $774. which includes accrued interest receivable of $15.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On June 12, 2019, MMG entered into a Personal Guaranty agreement with Dr. Doki, pursuant to which Dr. Naveen Doki personally guaranteed to MMG repayment of $3,000 of the balance of the Promissory Note issued to Vivos on November 15, 2017, within the 2019 calendar year via cash, stock, or other business assets acceptable to the Company. Dr. Doki is a 5% or greater beneficial holder of Company Common Stock, and therefore is a related party.

As of February 2020, the Company filed a lawsuit against the majority shareholder, pursuant to the personal guaranty agreement for defaulting on the outstanding notes receivables.

In summary, the Vivos HoldingsGroup receivable totaled $4,258 on December 31, 2020, which included $2,007 of additional borrowings over the period between November 2016 and December 31, 2109. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, the receivable totaled $4,3724,944.

On September 5, 2019, MMG entered into a Secured Promissory Note agreement with Vivos, pursuant to which MMG issued a secured promissory note to Vivos in the principal amount of $750. The note bears interest at 2.5% per year and requires Vivos to make monthly payments to MMG of $10 beginning December 1, 2019, with balance due and payable on November 1, 2026. Upon an event of default, which occurs upon failure of Vivos to make any monthly payment due under the terms of the note, MMG has the right to declare the entire unpaid balance of the note due and payable. The note is secured by 30,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock, which is due and payable upon a default by Vivos, which occurs upon failure of Vivos to make any monthly payment due under the terms of the note. In addition, both Naveen Doki and Silvija Valleru personally guaranty the repayment of the note by Vivos. Naveen Doki and Silvija Valleru were beneficial owners of Vivos and are also 5% or greater beneficial owners of Company Common Stock, which is qualified by the Merger Arbitration complaint. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, the total outstanding balance was $780,.which which includes interest of $12. In January 2021, MMG began charging the Maryland minimum interest rate by law allowed for defaulted totals as this note is in default and we are pursuing collection via the Vivos Default Claim.

Debt Settlement Agreements

On August 10, 2017, the Vivos Group executed a receivable advance agreement with Argus Capital Funding. MMG received a net advance of $487 in exchange for $705 of MMG’s accounts receivable. Included in this loan is a fee of $218. The agreement was refinanced on November 15, 2017, when Vivos, and Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, via Dr. Naveen Doki and Dr. Silvija Valleru entered into an agreement with CC Business Solutions, a division of Credit Cash NJ, LLC (“Credit Cash”) pursuant to which Credit Cash advanced to the Company $600 in exchange for $780 of the Company’s accounts receivable, to be repaid fully by approximately May 20, 2019 (the “Maslow Credit Facility”).

In addition, pursuant to the same agreement, Credit Cash advanced to Healthcare Resource Network, a company owned by the Vivos Group (“HCRN”) a credit facility in the principal amount of $1,005 (“HCRN Credit Facility”). Each of MMG, Vivos Holdings, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Mr. Naveen Doki and Mrs. Silvija Valleru guaranteed the HCRN Credit Facility. To secure repayment of their guaranteed obligations, the Company and Vivos Holdings granted to Credit Cash a security interest in all their assets. On September 14, 2018, the Company defaulted on the Maslow Credit Facility. In addition, on same date, the HCRN Credit Facility went into default. As a result, repayment on both facilities were accelerated, with the full balance for each becoming immediately due and payable. On December 10, 2018, the Company, Vivos Holdings, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Mr. Doki, and Mrs. Valleru and Credit Cash entered into a settlement agreement in connection the November 15, 2017, agreement to govern the terms of the repayment of the HCRN Credit Facility and Maslow Credit Facility. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay $10 per week until the entire balance of the Maslow Credit Facility was paid off. Pursuant to a subsequent agreement dated May 17, 2019, not involving the Company, Vivos Holdings and Vivos Acquisitions, LLC agreed to fully repay the HCRN Credit Facility via quarterly payments beginning JuneSeptember 30, 2019. The HCRN Credit Facility is still being repaid by Vivos Holdings, and as of October 29, 2019, hashad an outstanding balance of approximately $635.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company has a binding and enforceable agreement with certain shareholders permitting Maslow to liquidate up to the full amount of Maslow equity held by such shareholders to satisfy the shareholders’ obligations under the Settlement Agreements. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had repaid the outstanding balance due for the Maslow Credit Facility under the settlement agreementSettlement Agreement in full.

MMG was facing pressure to make cash payments pursuant to the Settlement Agreements prior to the Company’s anticipated liquidation of the shares of Company Common Stock pledged pursuant to the Liquidation Agreement. So, on July 21, 2021, as explained in Note 7, Maslow signed a settlement agreement with Kinetic Direct Funding, LLC and Libertas Funding, LLC for $475 in order to remove MMG from the remaining obligation owed by the Vivos Group which we were informed was $1,773.1,773.

The Vivos Group that are the counterparties to the Liquidation Agreement are not cooperating with the Company to liquidate the shares subject thereto as contemplated thereby. NoThe anticipated arbitration process could have this matter settled in the first quarter 2022. However, no assurance can be given how long it will take to enforce the requirements of the Liquidation Agreement. Having made the payment may at some point present a liquidity issue for the Company.

On August 9^th, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Doki, Valleru, Pathuri, Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and committed fraud in connection with the Merger.

On September 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Naveen Doki, M.D., and his affiliates and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The parties also agreed to maintain the status quo in corporate governance and related matters pending a final non-appealable judgment confirming any award in arbitration. The parties also signed a Tolling Agreement to toll the statute of limitations following the dismissal of a pending litigation.

Related Party Relationships

On October 29, 2019, prior to the Merger, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Naveen Doki and Silvija Valleru became beneficial owners of206,606,528 and 51,652,908 shares of RLBY Common Stock, respectively, equal to 68.9% and 17.2% of the total number of shares of RLBY Common Stock outstanding after giving effect to the Merger, respectively. The Company is seeking damages which if granted will likely be the remedy set forth within the merger agreementMerger Agreement which is primarily the relinquishment in whole or in part shares of Company Common Stock received by the Respondents in connection with the Merger.

On June 27, 2019, prior to the Merger, MMG entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Hawkeye Enterprises, Inc., a company owned and controlled by Mark Speck (“Mr. Speck”), an officer and then director of Maslow.

Pursuant to this agreement, MMG issued to Hawkeye Enterprises 16,323 (on a post-Merger basis) shares of Company Common Stock, a warrant (as defined below) for 81,616 (on a post-Merger basis) shares of Company Common Stock and a convertible promissory note of same date in the initial principal amount of $50, in exchange for $50. The note bore interest at 12% per year, with the balance of $56 paid in full on June 26, 2020.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On July 31, 2019, prior to the Merger, MMG entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Mr. Speck, the Company issued to this individual a Warrant for 81,616 (on(on a post-Merger basis) shares of MMG Common Stock and a convertible promissory note of same date in the initial principal amount of $50, in exchange for $50. The note bore interest at12% per year, with balance of $56 paid in full on August 4, 2020.

On July 31, 2019, prior to the Merger, MMG entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Nick Tsahalis, an executive officer and director of MMG. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company issued to this individual 32,646 (on a post-Merger basis) shares of MMG Common Stock, and a Warrant to purchase 16,323 (on a post-Merger basis) shares of the MMG Common Stock, and a Convertible Promissory Note of same date in the initial principal amount of $100, in exchange for $100.$100. The note bore interest at 12% per year, with balance of $112 becoming due and paid in full on July 31, 2020.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On September 18, 2019, in anticipation of the closing of the Merger and intending that it be assumed by MMG after the closing of the Merger, Hawkeye entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) regarding the potential acquisition of a complementary business. MMG was then prohibited from entering into the LOI directly. In connection with the LOI, Hawkeye paid a non-refundable deposit of $75 with the understanding that after the closing of the Merger, the LOI would be assigned to the Company and the Company would reimburse Hawkeye for the deposit. On October 17, 2019, Hawkeye assigned, and MMG agreed to assume the LOI and reimbursed Hawkeye for the deposit. The reimbursement took place on May 8, 2020, and totaledtotaling $83.

The term “warrant” herein refers to warrants issued by MMG and assumed by RLBY as a result of the Merger. The terms of all Warrants are the same other than as to the number of shares covered thereby. The Warrant may be exercised at any time or from time to time during the period commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time on first business day following the completion of the Qualified Financing (as defined below) and expiring at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the fifth annual anniversary thereof (the “Exercise Period”). For purposes herein, a “Qualified Financing” means the issuance by the Company, other than certain excluded issuances of shares of Common Stock, in one transaction or series of related transactions, which transaction(s) result in aggregate gross proceeds actually received by the Company of at least $5,000. The exercise price per full share of RLBY Common Stock shall be 120% of the average sale price of the RLBY Common Stock across all transactions constituting a part of the Qualified Financing, with equitable adjustments being made for any splits, combinations or dividends relating to the RLBY Common Stock, or combinations, recapitalization, reclassifications, extraordinary distributions and similar events, that occur following one transaction constituting a part of the Qualified Financing and prior to one or more other transactions constituting a part of the Qualified Financing (the “Exercise Price”).

Convertible note warrants were not valued and included as liability on balance sheet because of uncertainty around their pricing, value and low probability at this juncture in receiving the $5,000 trigger.

In prior filings, when referencing these related party notes, we have defined the issuer as the Company, when we could have been more specific and referenced MMG or Reliability. For clarification purposes, any of the related party transactions entered into prior to the Merger on October 29, 2019, should refer to MMG and not Reliability.

NOTE 9.10. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company operates within 4 industry segments: EOR, Recruiting and Staffing, Permanent (Direct) Placements and Video and Multimedia Production. The EOR segment provides media field talent to a host of large corporate customers in all 50 states. The Recruiting and Staffing segment provides skilled media and IT field talent on a nationwide basis for customers in a myriad of industries. Permanent Placements was added as a segment this quarter as the Company took on clients who will have the Company source candidates for permanent hire on a regular basis. The Video and Multimedia Production segment provides Script to Screen services for corporate, government and non-profit clients, globally.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following table provides a reconciliation of revenue by reportable segment to consolidated results for the three and nine months Ended Juneended September 30, 2021, and 2020, respectively:

For the three months ended September 30:

SCHEDULE OF RECONCILIATION OF REVENUE AND OPERATING INCOME BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT TO CONSOLIDATED RESULTS

For the three months ended June 30:

For the sixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30:

NOTE 10.11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through AugustNovember 15, 2021, the date on which the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Based upon this evaluation, management has determined that no material subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in or disclosures in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, except as follows:

On July 21,November 5, 2021, Maslow entered into a settlement agreement with Libertas and Kinetic,Congress passed H.R. 3684) infrastructure bill which resultedterminated early the ERC program, making wages paid after Sept. 30, 2021, ineligible for the credit. It is expected that monies the Company has been credited in MMG paying both parties $475, to settle the obligation which Vivos Holdings, LLC had committed MMG to, in July 2018.4^th quarter will reduce the 941 refund portions owed. The agreement which included $100 in legal fees, released MMG from all claims judgements and obligations against MMG but did not release Naveen Doki, Silvija Valleru, Judos Trust, Igly Trust, Srinivas Kalidindi, Shirisha Janumpally, Federal Systems, Kalyan Pathuri, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals Inc., Alliance Micro Inc. Vivos IT LLC, Vivos Global Holdings LLC, Vivos Acquisitions LLC, or Vivos Holdings.fromCompany awaits IRS guidance on how this will be handled, given the remaining obligation. According to Kinetic and Libertas the amount due before the settlement was $1,773. MMG became a debtor when Vivos Holdings had included MMG as a signer on its confession of judgement in September 2018. MMG will pursue enforcementretroactive nature of the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement, (See Note 2) which was put into place prior to the Merger Agreement to shield the Company if the Vivos Group should default, which unbeknownst to the Company had already transpired, prior to the merger closing. However, upon default the Libertas notes reverted to their original outstanding totals. There were 4 total loans in the settlement, with the 3 domesticated judgements in Montgomery County circuit court relating to MMG totaling $1,038. MMG’s negotiated payment of $475 settles that portion of the Libertas debt.legislation.

On August 9, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Doki, Valleru, Pathuri, Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, asserting that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and potentially committed fraud in connection with the Merger.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This section includes several forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including, but not limited to, statements about our plans, strategies, adequacy of resources and future financial results (such as revenue, gross profit, operating profit, cash flow), are forward-looking statements. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by words like “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “can,” “could,” “should,” “intends,” “project,” “predict,” “plans,” “estimates,” “goal,” “target,” “possible,” “potential,” “would,” “seek,” and similar references to future periods. These statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Because these forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are subject to change, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on us and our clients; our ability to access the capital markets by pursuing additional debt and equity financing to fund our business plan and expenses on terms acceptable to the Vivos Group or at all; negative outcome of pending and future claims and litigation and our ability to comply with our contractual covenants, including in respect of our debt; potential loss of clients and possible rejection of our business model and/or sales methods; weakness in general economic conditions and levels of capital spending by customers in the industries we serve; weakness or volatility in the financial and capital markets, which may result in the postponement or cancellation of our customers’ projects or the inability of our customers to pay our fees; delays or reductions in U.S. government spending; credit risks associated with our customers; competitive market pressures; the availability and cost of qualified labor; our level of success in attracting, training and retaining qualified management personnel and other staff employees; changes in tax laws and other government regulations, including the impact of health care reform laws and regulations; the possibility of incurring liability for our business activities, including, but not limited to, the activities of our temporary employees; our performance on customer contracts; and government policies, legislation or judicial decisions adverse to our businesses. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. We recommend readers to carefully review the entirety of this Quarterly Report, the “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the other reports and documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), particularly our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, our expectations regarding the future performance of our business and the other non-historical statements in the discussion and analysis are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors including those described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, with the SEC. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with our financial statements and related notes thereto and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND COMMENTS RELATED TO OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these unaudited consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no material changes or developments in the Company’s evaluation of the accounting estimates and the underlying assumptions or methodologies that it believes to be Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates as disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Management’s Discussion included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, includes discussion of various factors and items related to the Company’s results of operations and liquidity. There have been no other significant changes in most of the factors discussed in the Form 10-K and many of the items discussed in the Form 10-K are relevant to 2021 operations; thus, the reader of this report should read Management’s Discussion included in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues

Revenues Forfor the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, was $5,074$6,941 which was $123 lower$740 or 12% greater than for the same period in 2020 which was $5,197.$6,201. EOR led the revenue uptick by delivering $5,705 or 82% of the quarterly revenue. This was a $831 or 17%, improvement over the third quarter in 2020. IQS the Company’s IT staffing division hadsaw a revenue decline of $542$410 or 80%82% from the same period a year ago which offset the improvement in revenue by EOR $3,981 for quarter, up $174 or 4.6% andthe Media Staffing $676division which was up $210$267 or 45%, and $3044% from the same period a year ago. Permanent Placement which was not an earning center in revenue from a Permanent Placement

2020 contributed $38 which was $8 more than the second quarter. Although IT staffing revenues do not include an IT permanent placement for $30 indirect placements made by the quarterCompany, which are considered Permanent Placement these are among the diverse resources we provide clients along with finance and expectaccounting, and Media. The Company expects an increase in this activity as certain new clients are asking us for this service. The Company will be treating Permanent Placement revenue as a separate business segment as reflected above in Note 9.

Video Production’s $236 in revenue was $21 higher than the third quarter in 2020 as new clients more than filled the void of those with declining demand due to COVID-19.

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, revenue totaled $10,868$17,809 which was $3,130$2,390 less than a year ago. 42% ofago, or a 12% decrease when compared to the revenues for the 6-month period totaling $13,998 a year ago, were earned prior to any impact by Covid 19.year. Business segments with the largest declines in the six-monthnine-month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2021, when compared to a year earlier, were EOR at $2.481$1,678 or 22.6%11% and IQS which derived $1,058$1,593 less, a 72%76% decline. EOR was largely negatively impacted by COVID-19, which has seen some of our larger clients not yet return to full strength on site. IQS’s experienced the loss of its largest customer Lifetouch, which informed the Company in the fall of 2020 that it had decided to offshore their IT software quality assurance professionals effective January 1, 2021, resulting in declines of revenue of $595$874 year to date, when compared to same period in 2020. Meanwhile Tapfin, which is the vendor management solution for Abbott Labs, has converted a number of IQS’s employees to their staff and have not renewed other employee resulting in a year-to-date loss of revenue of $201.$380. In order to offset these lost revenues, the Company will focushas begun focusing business development resources on growing the IT staffing business in the second half of 2021.

Conversely, Media Staffing however has increased its 6-monthnine-month revenue to 1,286$2,158 from $965,$1,445, a $321$713 or 33%49% improvement. This is due to the acquisition of 67 new clients by our revamped 6-month-old sales team, which added $231$546 and an increased demand for this service ($90)167) by our existing clients, driven by our expertise in delivering top rated media talent to our customers.

Video Production’s 6-monthnine-month revenue performance also saw an improvement to the same period a year ago by $80,$101, with revenues totaling $661.$897.

Cost of Revenue / Gross Profit

Gross Profitprofit for the three-month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2021, was $718$803 representing 14.2%11.6% of revenues, which was $28 below$149 greater than in 2020’s third quarter when the gross profit of $723 in the first quarter of 2021 and $5 below the gross profit for the same period in 2020.margin was at 10.5%.

Although theMedia Staffing which saw a 44.2% increase in revenue from Q1 declinedhad strong margins at 21.1%, while Permanent Placement margins were greater than 90%. EOR margins were compressed by 2.4% from Q1 2020, lower cost of revenue resulted in a gross margin decline of just over 1 point to 9.1% due to contractual incentives given to certain clients for reaching predetermined revenue levels, and a half a point (.6%). Thus, gross profit at $718 was only $5 less than a year ago at $723. Quarterly Margin improvement from 13.9%high level of sick leave paid by the company to 14.2% was driven by Permanent Placement revenue of $30 with gross margin at 96.4%; resulting in overall gross margin improvement by half a point from 13.7 to 14.2%. Otherwise, quarterly comparative gross margin would have been slightly lower by 20 basis points than it was a year ago.its outsourced employees.

Year to date 2021, the Company’s gross margin percentage improved to 13.5%12.7% from 12.5%11.9% which can be attributed mainly to EOR margin reaching 10% on gross profitMedia and IT Staffing margins being > 21% and Permanent Placement which so far have enjoyed margins north of $856 in90%. Absent our Media Staffing year over year Growth and Permanent Placement Revenue, our margins year to date for the period ending September 30, 2021, compared to 9.3% on $1,018 in same period in 2020.would be half a point lower at 12.2%.

EOR and Media Staffing margin boosts (.07% and .06% respectively) coupled with Permanent Placement margin of $29 (96.4%) offset the steep decline in IQS higher margin gross profit which saw a year over year decline by $334 or 73% from $458 to $124.

Overall margin improvement in EOR, Media Staffing and Video Production year over year contributed $82 in gross profit, representing 4.7% of 2020 first half gross profit.

General and Administrative (“G&A”)

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, were $878,$866, as compared to $1,240$1,086 in the comparable period in 2020, representing a 28.6%20.3% reduction. This was also a reduction of $12 from our prior quarter ending on June 30, 2021. The $362$220 decrease in comparative three-month periods is duecan be attributed directly to reductionssavings in salary and benefit costs by $180,$109, and outside legal costs $79, and rent costs by $66.of $111. Over the 6-monthnine-month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2021, management has trimmed $657$884 or 28%25.7% of G&A costs, as they represented 15.6%represent 14.3% of revenue as opposed to 16.8%17% a year ago. The reduction was achieved while increasing the costssales portion of sales G&A year over year forin the quarterlast 6 months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2021 by $74 or 45%.$174 as the Company has added additional sales resources.

Interest Expense

The Company recognized interest expense in the amount of $18$15 during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021, compared to $114$30 or 50% during the same prior year period. The $96 (84.5%) decreaseFor the nine-month period ending September 30, 2021, MMG interest costs were $78 compared to $283 for the same nine-month period a year earlier, representing a $205, or 72% savings. This cost reduction is directly attributed to a significantly reduced reliance on the factoring line that had an outstanding ending Q2Q3 2021 balance of $86$939 compared to $1,043 at conclusion of second quarter 2020. The reduced reliance on factoring is attributed to the Earned Income Credit (“ERC”) which enabled the Company to reduce its payroll cost obligations by $1,156 during the third quarter.

However, when compared to the second quarter 2021, MMG’s $939 factoring balance was $853 higher. This was largely because of our need to finance $475 to pay Vivos Group outside debt. The other factor was that the $86 balance at the end of June 2021 was exceedingly low as our average year to date balance had been around $530.

Other Income (Expense)

Spurred by the PPP forgiveness principal of $5,216, a reversal on PPP interest $59, and ERC totaling $2,767, other income for the three-month period ending September 30, 2021, which totaled $8,042$1,813 resulting in the Company experiencing secondthird quarter pre-tax net earningsincome of $7,942$1,816 compared to a $324$429 pre-tax net loss a year earlierearlier.

Over the nine-month period ending September 30, 2021, the PPP forgiveness of $5,216 and the ERC’s totaling $4,674 enabled the Company to experience pre-tax net earnings of $7,240 during the six months ended June 30, 2021,$9,725 compared to a loss of $561$1,221 in the comparable period of the prior year.

The ERC consisted of a second quarter request for a first quarter refund of $1,440. Subsequently the Company received $153 in ERC credits against the last two payrolls in June 2021 and has requested a refund of another $1,174 covering the remainder of the second quarter 2021. The Company qualified for the ERC in 2021 as its quarterly revenue was < 80% of its 2019 revenue for the same periods.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our working capital requirements are driven predominantly by EOR field talent payments, G&A salaries, public company costs, interest associated with factoring, and client accounts receivable receipts. Since receipts from client payments are on average 70 days behind payments to field talent, working capital requirements can be periodically challenged. We have a Factoring Facility with Triumph Business Capital (“TBC”).TBC, whereas TBC advances 93% of our eligible receivables at an advance rate of 15 basis points, an interest rate of prime plus 2%., and our prime floor rate at 4%. As a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our clients may be more likely to be delinquent in their payments. However, to date, we have not seen any adverse change in our collections, with our Days Outstanding (DSO) for first halfnine months of the year2021 at 6359 comparable to the 6861 DSO for period ending December 31, 2020. InBy June 2020 our DSO increased into 67 from 60 in 2019 to 68 as several of our large clients began demanding 60-to-90-day terms. Delays in receipt of purchase orders also had an adverse impact on DSO. However,It appears the pendulum over the past 3 quarters has swung favorably as only 3.5% of June 30, 2021, only 2.4% of $3,303$4,405 in Accounts Receivable (“A/R”) was > 31 days past invoice due dates, with only .2%1% > 60.

When looking at A/R aging in relation to invoice date, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, 61%56.3% of our $3,303$4,405 in total A/R was < 31 days aged, compared to 64% in the quarter ending March 31, 2021.49% a year ago.

The Company has an additional $2,615$3,221 in other receivables associated with our ERC eligibility for the first three quarters of 2021. Conversely our Federal and second quarters 2021.state tax liability has now increased to $1,030.

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations via accounts receivable and borrowings under our Factoring Facility with Triumph enabling access to the 7% unfactored portion. Because certain large clients have changed their payment practices announcing 60- and 90-day terms amounting to a unilateral extension to contractual terms by 30-60 days, we can be adversely impacted since Triumph does not provide credit if an account obligor pays more than 120 days after the invoice date.

Our primary uses of cash are for payments to field talent, corporate and staff employees, related payroll liabilities, operating expenses, public company costs, including but not limited to, general and professional liability and directors and officer’s liability insurance premiums, legal fees, filing fees, auditor and accounting fees, stock transfer services, and board compensation; followed by cash factoring and other borrowing interest; cash taxes; and debt payments.

Since we are an EOR with the majority of contracted talent paid as W-2 employees who are paid known amounts on a consistent schedule; our cash inflows do not typically align with these required payments, resulting in temporary cash challenges, which is why we employ factoring.

Vivos Debtors as of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, had notes receivable totaling $4,387$4,949 including default on a $3,000 promissory note and on a $750 tax obligation in December 2019. After numerous failed collection attempts, on February 17, 2020, the Company initiated an action in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County Maryland against Naveen Doki and the Vivos Holdings for nonpayment.non-payment.

It was also anticipated that following the Merger, the Company would both access the capital markets by selling additional shares of Company Common Stock and use shares of Company Common Stock as currency to acquire other business revenues. However, all 300 million authorized shares of Company Common Stock were issued in connection with the Merger. No shares are expected to become available to the Company until the legal dispute with the Vivos Debtors and Vivos Group is resolved. At that point, the Company can decide whether to amend the Company’s Certificate of Formation to increase the number of authorized shares of Company Common Stock or approve a reverse-split of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock to provide additional shares for these purposes. No assurance can be given as to when this might take place.

On May 5, 2020, MMG received a $5,216 loan through the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) with a term of two (2) years and an interest rate of 1% per annum. The PPP provided that the Company be eligible for forgiveness if the loan proceeds were used for payroll and certain other specified operating expenses while maintaining specified headcount requirements. On June 10, 2021, the Company was informed by the SBA that it had met the requirements and that both the $5,216 and of accrued interest through May 2021, totaling $57 were forgiven

The funds bolstered our working capital and enabled us to bring back employees and continue to serve our clients even though their requirements had lessened.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2021, our working capital was $7,991,$9,417, compared to $5,970 at the end of December 2020, $7,991 as of September 30, 2020, and $6,152 the quarter ending June$566 as of March 30, 2020, approximately aone month before the PPP funds were received. The PPP funds enabled the Company to build A/R reserves since PPP funds were employed to pay salaries of both outsourced and G&A employees during the covered 24-week period between May and October 2020. WorkingOur adjusted working capital at the end of JuneSeptember 2021, excluding the notes receivable of $4,387,related to the Vivos Debtors totaling $4,949, was $3,604.$4,865.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Risk Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The President and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the President and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, known to the President and Chief Financial Officer that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

RELIABILITY INC.

OTHER INFORMATION

JuneSeptember 30, 2021

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and an adverse result in these, or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Except as set forth below, we are not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims against the Company.

On or about February 17, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, VREH and Naveen Doki (the “Defendants”), to enforce MMG’s rights under certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the defendants (the “Debt Collection Suit”). The aggregate amount of these obligations as of the balance sheet date is approximately $4,308. The case is proceeding. The Company believes that it will be granted a judgment in its favor. MMG has vigorously pursued this litigation and atrial on this matter is scheduledbut as of September 7, both parties agreed to beginhave their case heard in the Circuit Courtfront of Montgomery County,a Maryland on October 4, 2021.Arbiter (See Below).

On or about May 6, 2020, the Defendants filed with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland a Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint for Damages, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Jury Demand (the “Vivos Default Counterclaim”), The Company believes thatbelieving the Counterclaim has no merit. The Companymerit, continues to vigorously defended itself and its indemnified officers, directors and other parties as permitted by the Company’s organizational documents. The Company and the other Counterclaim defendants have moved to have the Debt Collection Suit and the Counterclaim stayed pending the outcome of the Arbitration described below in Intent to Arbitrate. A full trial covering the Vivos Group note defaults and the Vivos Group’s countersuitOn September 7^th, 2021 (see last paragraph below) both parties agreed to have all matters settled through a binding arbitration process which was originally scheduledcited as a remedy for March 2021, will take place startingmerger violations in the merger agreement. This process is to be completed within 150 days of the execution of this agreement on October 4,September 7^th, 2021.

On or about June 5, 2020, the Company submitted a Claimant’s Notice of Intention to Arbitrate and Demand For Arbitration (the “Arbitration”) with the American Arbitration Association in New York, and to the Respondents thereto: Naveen Doki; Silvija Valleru; Shirisha Janumpally (individually and in her capacity as trustee of Judos Trust); Kalyan Pathuri (individually in his capacity as trustee of Igly Trust) and Federal Systems (the “Respondents”). The Arbitration alleges that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and committed fraud in connection with the Merger. The Company is seeking damages which if granted will likely be the remedy set forth within the merger agreement which is in whole or in part shares of Company Common Stock received by the Respondents in connection with the Merger. The Company has brought a motion to compel the Arbitration which is currently being decided byand the Respondents countered with a motion to dismiss Reliability’s Petition to Compel Arbitration to the Federal Courts in New York. The Company believes a strong basis forOn August 4, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, denied the Respondents motion exists, but no assurance can be given that it will be granted. Regardless, the Company intends to pursue claims under the Merger Agreement in whatever venue is required.dismiss.

On June 12, 2020, Igly Trust, a Vivos entity, asked the Texas court for an injunction requiring the Company to provide a shareholder list and to hold a shareholder meeting. On October 20, 2020, the Texas court denied the injunction but, incongruously, dismissed all the Vivos plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Company appealed the dismissal because the court had jurisdiction over Igly Trust once it made affirmative claims in Texas and because the Court’s order denying the injunction is an important precedent for establishing that the directors under Texas law retain control of shareholder lists and determining the timing of shareholder meetings. This matter has since been moved into a single binding arbitration proceeding in Maryland.

After an extension was granted to Reliability’s “reply brief,” on June 2nd, 2021, Reliability, Incorporated, Maslow Media Group, Inc, Nick Tsahalis and Mark Speck filed an appellant’s brief in the Fourteenth District of Texas, Houston Texas to challenge the court’s prior ruling granting a special appearance to Igly Trust and to the Doki Shareholders. A response to the filed appellant brief has not yet been received. This matter has since been moved into a single binding arbitration proceeding in Maryland.

On December 23, 2020, after an evidentiary hearing before the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, a judge denied a motion by Vivos Holdings, LLC, VREH, Doki, Kaylan Pathuri (“Pathuri”), Judos Trust by Shirisha Janumpally, its trustee (“Judos”) and Igly Trust by Kaylan Pathuri, its trustee, (“Igly”) to compel a shareholder meeting based on the facts presented at trial. The judge also commented that, based on the evidence presented, management was performing its fiduciary duties to protect the Company despite adverse circumstances. This same judge will be presiding over aA full trial regardingto address the Company’s lawsuit to enforce the repayment of notes and the Vivos Group counterclaim, was scheduled to commence in a trial starting onearly October 4, 2021.but was preempted by an agreement by both sides to go to arbitration (See last paragraph).

On January 20, 2021, Defendants and Counter/Third-Party Plaintiffs, Vivos Holdings, LLC (“Vivos”), Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), Dr. Naveen Doki (“Doki”), Kaylan Pathuri (“Pathuri”), Igly Trust (“Igly”), Judos Trust (“Judos”), by counsel, filed a Notice of Appeal with the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland denying their Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed on December 23, 2020. However, the deadline to pursue the appeal lapsed absent additional filings by the Vivos Group.

On August 9^th, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Doki, Valleru, Pathuri, Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, asserting that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and potentially committed fraud in connection with the Merger.

The following legal proceedings where Vivos Group borrowings impacting MMG:

On September 28, 2018, Credit Cash filed a complaint against MMG, Vivos, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Dr. Doki, Dr. Valleru (the “Parties”) and other defendants in the United States Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland for the District of New Jersey for, among other things, breach of contract of the MMG and HCRN Credit Facilities and their respective guaranties in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement (the “DNJ Action”). On October 30, 2018, Credit Cash filed a motion to intervene in an action pending in New York State, Monroe County, filed by HCRN and LE Finance, LLC against the Parties, and other defendants (“NY State Action”). On December 10, 2018, the Parties entered into a settlement agreement for the purpose of settling certain claims related to the DNJ Action only. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, certain repayment terms were agreed upon between Credit Cash and the Parties, but Credit Cash did not relinquish the right to pursue any claims related to the NY State Action, nor to pursue any remedies against any of the parties in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement. Certain of the Vivos Group executed and delivered to MMG that certain Agreement for the Contingent Liquidation of the Common Stock of Maslow Media Group, Inc., dated as of October 28, 2019 (the “Liquidation Agreement”), pursuant to which such Vivos Group pledged to MMG the shares of Company Common Stock they received in the Merger to provide the capital required to satisfy the Parties’ obligations under the Settlement Agreements. Vivos Group misrepresented upon the execution of the Liquidation Agreement to MMG the status of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement, which were, in fact, then in default. To date these Vivos Group have not cooperated with the Company to monetize those shares as contemplated by the Liquidation Agreement. The Company will take appropriate action to enforce its rights under the Liquidation Agreement, which actions will be dictated in part by the outcome of the Arbitration. On or about March 16, 2020, Credit Cash entered its New Jersey confession of judgment with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland. MMG needs to confirm whether this matter has been settled and if so whether MCA lenders and HCRN remitted payments to Credit Cash, and if so, which liens have been removed.

Healthcare Resource Network Complaint: On or about February 17, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Mr. Naveen Doki, to enforce MMG’s rights under certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the defendants. The case is proceeding. The Company believes that it will be granted a judgment in its favor. MMG intends to continue to vigorously pursue this litigation. On September 3, 2020, MMG and HCRN entered into a Tolling Agreement pursuant to which HCRN dismissed MMG from this litigation without prejudice and agreed to forebear filing a new complaint or initiating any lawsuit or other legal proceeding against MMG until January 31, 2022.

On or about May 5, 2020, Kinetic Direct Funding domesticated a foreign judgement in the Montgomery County Circuit Court system again Health Care Resources Network (HCRN), Maslow Media Group, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals, Alliance Micro, Inc. and Naveen Doki. This foreign judgement from the State of New York relates to loans the Vivos Group took out by adding Maslow Media Group as additional collateral. This loan is currently in default. Foreign Judgement total is $579. There was a settlement reached on 10/1/2021 with both parties releasing each other of any and all claims with no assets changing hands. MMG needs to determine which lien releases have been filed.

On July 21, 2021, MMG came to an agreement with Kinetic and Libertas for $475 to release MMG from being obligated to this Vivos Group debt. (SeeThe intended shield to protect MMG from having to pay Vivos Group’s debt was the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement which Vivos Debtors refuse to comply with (as covered in Note 10)7).

On August 9, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Doki, Valleru, Pathuri, Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, asserting that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and potentially committed fraud in connection with the Merger.

On September 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Naveen Doki, M.D., and his affiliates and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The parties also agreed to maintain the status quo in corporate governance and related matters pending a final non-appealable judgment confirming any award in arbitration. The parties also signed a Tolling Agreement to toll the statute of limitations following the dismissal of a pending litigation. The binding Arbitration must be completed with 150 days of the agreement date which places the deadline date around February 4, 2022.

Item 1a. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, shareholders should carefully consider the factors discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

We are currently engaged in substantial and complex litigation and arbitration with the Vivos Group, the outcome of which could materially harm our business and financial results.

As more fully described in Note 6(Commitments7 (Commitments and Contingencies) of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, we are currently engaged in litigation and arbitration with the Vivos Group. The litigation includes multiple complaints and counterclaims by us and the Vivos Group in venues in Maryland and Texas. The arbitration was brought by the Company to enforce its rights under the Merger Agreement.

The litigation and arbitration are substantial and complex, and they have caused and could continue to cause us to incur significant costs, as well as distract our management over an extended period. The litigation and arbitration may substantially disrupt our business and we cannot assure you that we will be able to resolve the litigation on terms favorable to us or that we will be successful in the arbitration.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits:

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Index to Exhibits

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections