The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGE IN EQUITY

For the SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

RELIABILITY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, continued

(amounts in thousands)

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Operations

Reliability, Inc.Incorporated is a leading provider of employer of record and media and information technology (“IT”) staffing services that operates,Workforce Management & Staffing Solutions, along with its wholly owned subsidiary, The Maslow Media Group, Inc (“MMG”), (collectively, “Reliability” or the “Company”), primarily within the United States of America in four industry segments: Employer of Record (“EOR”), Recruiting and Staffing, Permanent Direct Placements, and Video and Multimedia Production which provides script to screen media talent.Services. Our Staffing segment provides skilled field talent on a nationwide basis for Media, Video Production, IT, and financeFinance and accountingAccounting client partner projects. Our Staffing segment occasionally receivedreceives requests for (direct)direct placements. Because of an uptick in direct hire requests in 2021, factoring in the much higher margins that business derives. Video Production involves assembling and providing crews for special projects that can last anywhere from a week to 6 months.

Reliability was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas in 1953, but the then principal business of the Company started in 1971 was closed in 2007. The Company completed a reverse merger with MMG (the “Merger”) on October 29, 2019.

Company Background

Linda Maslow founded Maslow Group initially in 1988 and incorporated the firm under the name the Maslow Media Group Inc., in March 1992.

On November 9, 2016, Linda Maslow sold the business to Vivos Holdings, LLC (“Vivos Holdings”) owned by Dr. Naveen Doki (“Dr. Doki”) and Silvija Valleru (“Ms. Valleru”).

In 2018, Vivos Holdings and several other Vivos companies, (“Vivos Group”) engaged an investment banker who approached management of Reliability to discuss a potential reverse merger transaction. The other investors who collaborated on a share swap of MMG for other Vivos companies were Shirisha Janumpally (“Mrs. Janumpally”), wife of Dr. Doki, and Kalyan Pathuri (“Mr. Pathuri”), husband of Silvija Valleru.

These 4 individuals, included but were not limited to Dr. Doki, Mrs. Janumpally, Mr. Pathuri, and Mrs. Valleru, Igly Trust, and Judos Trust also have common ownership combinations in a number of other entities [Vivos Holdings, LLC. Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), Vivos Holdings, Inc., Vivos Group, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC., and Federal Systems, LLC], (collectively referred to herein as “Vivos Group”).

The reverse merger was consummated on October 29, 2019. As a result of the Merger, the Vivos Group (Vivos Holdings LLC, officially) acquired approximately 8484%% of the issued and outstanding shares of Reliability which were distributed by Vivos Holdings, LLC.

On October 29, 2019, MMG became a wholly owned subsidiary of Reliability by merging R-M Merger Sub, Inc., a Virginia corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Reliability, with and into Maslow, with MMG being the surviving corporation.

The Company ceased to be a “shell” company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) by virtue of its ownership of MMG following the Merger. The acquisition of MMG also resulted in a “change in control” of Reliability.

Upon purchasing MMG and thereafter, Vivos Holdings, LLC and their affiliates (collectively the “Vivos Group”) began borrowing monies from MMG starting with $1,400 in 2016 and by the end of 2019 the balance had reached $3,418 which included a $3,000 guarantee from Dr. Naveen Doki. (See Note 8 for more details).

On or about February 25, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Dr. Doki (collectively “Vivos Debtors”), to enforce Maslow’s rights under certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the Dr. Doki.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On or about May 6, 2020, the Vivos Debtors filed a counterclaim and third-party complaint for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief, and jury demand (the “Counterclaim”).

We refer below to the disputes between Reliability and the Vivos Group as the “Vivos Matter.”

On March 21, 2022, the Company began agreed upon arbitration proceedings against the Vivos Group. Among several claims, MMG sought remedy on three notes, plus a guarantee totaling approximately $5,039 when the arbitration hearing began.

On August 2, 2022, VREH filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in the District Court of Maryland. This action prevented the Arbitrator from providing any ruling relating to Note II in the arbitration case at the time of his award.

On August 24^, 2022, the Company filed a motion to stay the VREH Bankruptcy filing to allow the Arbitrator to rule on the claims against VREH. The motion to lift the stay was granted by the court on September 16, 2022, after the initial award by the Arbitrator.

On August 31, 2022, the Arbitrator issued an award (the “Award”) with the Company and MMG prevailing on their claims. The Company and MMG were awarded the following:

Section 11.404(a)(1)(B) of the Texas Business Organizations Code provides for the appointment of a rehabilitative receiver when “the governing persons of the entity are deadlocked in the management of the entity’s affairs, the owners or members of the entity are unable to break the deadlock, and irreparable injury to the entity is being suffered or is threatened because of the deadlock.” With respect to the receivership, the owners or holders of all of the shares of common stock of the Company received as a result of the conversion of 1,600 shares of common stock of MMG owed by Naveen and Valleru under the Merger Agreement shall not be entitled to vote any of those shares at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders of the Company during the period of the receivership. Upon the completion of the receiver’s primary function of collecting damages due to the Company, the receivership shall terminate and the restrictions on the rights of the shareholders of the Company imposed by the Award shall be lifted.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company also began pursuing arbitration in New York in 2020, which was the contractual remedy for breaches of the Merger agreement between MMG and Reliability. It is the Company’s contention that the Vivos Group failed to disclose several material pieces of information to Reliability management pre-merger as was required by the Merger agreement. Additionally, the Vivos Group declined to honor multiple commitments made to Reliability, including a $3,000 promissory note and an agreement to shield the Company from their personal debt per the “Liquidation Agreement.” Per the Merger Agreement, these breaches can lead to a loss of up to all shares in Reliability for the Vivos Group.

On December 23, 2020, at a hearing in the Maryland Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, a motion by the Vivos Group to compel a shareholder meeting was summarily dismissed. On January 20, 2021, Defendants and Counter/Third-Party Plaintiffs, Vivos, VREH, Dr. Doki, Mr. Pathuri, Igly, Judos, by counsel, filed a Notice of Appeal on the dismissal. However, the deadline to pursue the appeal lapsed absent additional filings by the Vivos Group.

On July 21, 2021, MMG settled the obligation which with it had been committed by Vivos Holdings, LLC in July 2018, with Libertas Funding, LLC and Kinetic for $475. This debt belonged to Vivos Holdings, LLC, and the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement, had been created as a safeguard to shelter MMG should Vivos Holdings, LLC default, which actually transpired prior to the Merger closing in October 2019.

On September 7, 2021, the Company entered to Arbitration and Tolling Agreements (the “Agreements”) with the Vivos Group and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported inArbitration had until September 19, 2022 to submit their requests related to the Texas, New York, and Maryland courts and beforeSupplemental Award to be filed by the American Arbitration Association.Arbitrator relating to the assignment of a Receiver. An extension was granted until October 6, 2022 at which point all parties submitted their requests to the Arbitrator. The Agreements call forparties now have until November 23, 2022 to respond to the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland.

On March 21, 2022, the Company began its arbitration proceedings against the Vivos Group. MMG contends the Vivos Group committed merger violations which could result in relinquishment in whole or in part shares of Company common stocksubmissions received by the Respondents in connection withArbitrator on October 6, 2022. The Company does not have a definitive date by which it will receive the Merger. We anticipate an arbitration decisionsupplemental award identified in the third quarter 2022.

We refer below toArbitration Award dated August 31, 2022, but hopes it will be received before the disputes between Reliability andend of the Vivos Group as the “Vivos Matter.”year.

Upon a final resolution as to the underlying ownership and rights of certain shareholders, the Company intends to hold an annual meeting of shareholders within a reasonable time thereafter.

Basis of presentation

The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all wholly owned divisions, including its 100100%% owned subsidiary, MMG. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the rules of the SEC and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Concentration of Credit Risk

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, 22.520.3% % of revenue came from Goldman Sachs, 13.5% from AT&T Services Inc. (inclusive of its DirecTV division)Inc (“AT&T”), 21.1% from Goldman Sachs, and 13.212.2% % from Janssen Pharmaceuticals (which includes workforce partner Johnson & Johnson). and 10.8% from DirecTV. Combined, this totals 56.856.7% % of revenue. AT&T, Goldman Sachs, Janssen, and Morgan Stanley and DirectTV accounted for 24.118.1%%, 16.315.7%%, 11.213.8%%, 11%, and 13.58.6% %, respectively, 65.167.1% % in aggregate revenue for the same period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2021. No other client has exceeded 10% of revenues in 2022 or 2021.

NOTE 2. LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN

Going Concern

Management considers on a regular basis, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The factors which have impacted the business and our liquidity are:

All these conditions noted and factored above, with the primary risk being that the arbitration (see Item 1) outcome is not in the Company’s favor, and if the $5,0945,157 in notes receivable is not realized in full, part, or all, createscreate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Additionally, from an operational view the underlying business has yet to fully recover from COVID-19 with current quarterly comparative revenue levels down 32%36% from 2019 standards.

Therefore, there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in managing the impact of the foregoing or its ability to maintain sufficient liquidity over a period of time that will allow it to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome from these uncertainties.

The Company is quoted on the OTC Marketplace under the symbol “RLBY.”

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable can beare broken down as follows

SCHEDULE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. An entity no longer will determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The FASB also eliminated the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this update will be effective for the Company beginning with fiscal year 2023, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this during 2021 resulting in an impairment charge as stated in the financial statements.

The Company does not believe any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncement, if adopted, would have a material effect on its present or future consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 5. DEBT

Tax Liabilities

When MMG was initially acquired by Vivos Holdings, LLC in December 2016, the Company’s corporate status was changed from an S Corp to a C Corp due to its new ownership structure. This triggered an accelerated tax event, a $215 estimated annual impact per year for 4 years which was accounted for in subsequent tax returns through 2019. In 2021, MMG completed settlement of the estimated $860 tax liability caused by the Vivos Group in 2017, paying the final estimated portion of $300 in 2021.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2022, the Company no longer has a federal tax liability related to tax periods prior to 2020, with the combined federal and state tax liability at $93.2020.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JuneSeptember 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Factoring Facility

Triumph Business CapitalGulf Coast Bank and Trust

On November 4, 2016, the Company entered into aAugust 24, 2022, we were notified by our factoring and security agreement withcompany Triumph Business Capital (“Triumph”TBC”). Pursuant that our factoring arrangement had been sold to the agreement, the Company received advances onGulf Coast Bank and Trust (“Gulf”), as TBC had decided to sell its non-transportation portfolio. The transition took place between August 26^th and 28^th with new financing coming from Gulf. However, until all open accounts receivable (i.e., invoices) through Triumph(“A/R”) managed by TBC is collected, a portion of those funds plus non factored receivables continue to fund growth and operations. The proceeds of this agreement were usedcome to pay operating costs of the business which include employee salaries, vendor payments and overhead expenses. On January 5, 2018, the agreement was amended to lower the factoring fee and interest rate for a term of one year. The agreement was amended again on January 19, 2018, to increase the maximum advance rate to $5,500. In January 2020, a new agreement was negotiated with Triumph lowering advance rateMMG from 50 basis points to 15 and the interest rate from prime plus 3.5% to prime plus 2%. The amount of an invoice eligible for sale to Triumph went from 90% to 93%. The agreement which previously renewed annually, is now month to month.TBC. The Company continues to be obligated to meet certain financial covenants in respect to invoicing and reserve account balance.

In accordance with the agreement, a reserve amount is required for the total unpaid balance of all purchased accounts multiplied by a percentage equal to the difference between one hundred percent and the advanced rate percentage. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2022, the required amount was 77%%. Any excess of the reserve amount is paid to the Company on a weekly basis, as requested. If a reserve shortfall exists for a period of ten days, the Company is required to make payment to the financial institution for the shortage.

Accounts receivables were sold with full recourse. Proceeds from the sale of receivables were $4,1493,429 for the three-month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2022, compared to $1,1311,756 for the same period ending on JuneSeptember 30, 2021, and $6,96010,388 compared to $2,453 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The total outstanding balance under the recourse contract was $2,7252,014 on JuneSeptember 30, 2022, compared to $946as of December 31, 2021.

The factoring facility is collateralized by substantially all the assets of the Company. In the event of a default, the factor may demand that the Company repurchase the receivable or debit the reserve account. Total finance line fees for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, and 2021 totaled $3646 and $1815, respectively, and $66111 and $6378 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

There are a number of debts and confessions of judgement (“COJ”) related to the Vivos Group that included MMG as a co-signer or guarantor at some stage in the Vivos Group debt process from November 2016 through October 29, 2019 when Vivos Holdings, LLC owned Maslow.

In December 2019, the Company’s executive management learned that prior to the Merger, in January 2018, one of the Company’s related parties, on behalf of MMG, executed a guarantee of obligations of Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), under a mortgage loan for the purchase of the property at 22 Baltimore Rd., Rockville, Maryland. MMG leased this space on market terms.terms through April 30, 2020. This obligation had not been disclosed by the Vivos Group to Reliability prior to the Merger and consequently not included in MMG’s financial statements.

On March 3, 2022, MMG received a notice of default, acceleration, and demand for payment in full, from FVCBank due to incurable events of default on behalf of Borrower, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC. Per the default notice, “As“[a]s of March 2, 2022, the total indebtedness due and owing under the Loan (the ‘‘Debt’’) is $1,743 consisting of an unpaid principal balance in the amount of $1,703 accrued and unpaid interest in the amount of $7, deferred payments in the amount of $20 and late fees in the amount of $12 plus prepayment penalties and attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses,” less setoff fees of $16. MMG believes it has grounds to contest it being a guarantor on the loan.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

On July 12, 2022, MMG was advised that a foreclosure sale of the 22 Baltimore Road property was scheduled to take place on Thursday August 4, 2022, at Montgomery County Circuit Court in Rockville, Maryland. It was subsequently cancelled after VREH filed for bankruptcy on August 2,^nd. 2022.

On August 2, 2022, VREH filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District Court of Maryland.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Maslow has filed a Motion to Vacate Confessed Judgment entered against it by FVC Bank in the Circuit Court for Fairfax County and has requested that the matter be heard before the end ofCounty. A hearing date is set for December 9, 2022.

On October 9, 2018, Maslow Media Group, Inc. was named as20, 2022, FVC bank filed a defendant in an Affidavit of COJMotion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Case for Cause with respect to this pending proceeding filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in relation to a case brought by Hop Capital against members of the Vivos Group, which had collectively agreed to pay a sum of $400 to HOP Capital. Maslow Media Group, Inc.VREH. A hearing date is named as one defendant among six other defendants. The claim brought by HOP Capital against the defendants in this case is in relation to a Merchant Agreement dated October 4, 2018, to which Maslow Media Group, Inc. was not a party. As such, MMG contends that being named in the Affidavit of COJ as a defendant was made in error and is currently seeking to have its name removed from the Affidavit of COJ as a defendant. As of August 10, 2022, we have not been contacted again on this matter, nor have we been notified on any developments.set for November 16, 2022.

On or aboutNovember 2, 2022, Maslow filed a “Response” to the Bank’s Motion to Dismiss, which in essence is a separate Motion for court to dismiss VREH’s Chapter 11 protection filing.

In October 2022, MMG learned that Vivos IT, LLC filed a lawsuit against Second Wind Consultants (“SWC”) in May 6, 2020,2019 included MMG as a plaintiff. The lawsuit included claims of fraud in inducement and unjust enrichment against SWC. The Five parties suing SWC, included Vivos LLC, The Maslow Media Group, Suresh Venkat Doki, Naveen Doki and Silvija Valleru. The lawsuit related to a debt restructuring services agreement secured by Suresh Doki, Naveen Doki and Silvija Valleru to assist the following then owned Vivos entities: Maslow Media Group, Inc., Health Care Resources Network, Inc., Mettler & Michael, Inc., 360 IT Professionals, Inc. and US IT Solutions, Inc. Second Wind countersued all plaintiffs on September 30th, 2019, seeking to collect the balance of $402,500 not paid by the Vivos Debtors and other Vivos Group members, specifically. Mr. Pathuri, Judos, and Igly respondedGroup. These suits were not disclosed to Maslow Management or to Reliability before the Vivos Default Claim with the “Vivos Default Counterclaim.” The Company continues to believe that the Counterclaim has no merit andmerger closed on October 29, 2019. MMG is vigorously defending itself andweighing its indemnified officers, directors, and other parties as permitted by the Company’s organizational documents, via a March 2022 arbitration hearing which both parties agreed on September 7, 2021, to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The hearing portion began on March 21,2022 and has since concluded. A decision is not anticipated until the third quarter 2022.legal options at this time.

At the present time, the Company is uncertain as to whether any of the above items will have a material impact on their consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 7. EQUITY

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 300,000,000 shares of common stock, with 0no par value. All authorized shares of Company Common stock are issued and outstanding.

NOTE 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On November 9, 2016, Vivos Holdings, LLC, the former owner of MMG, acquired 100100%% of MMG through a stock acquisition exchange for a purchase price of $1,750, of which: (i) $1,400 was paid at settlement with proceeds from MMG and (ii) a promissory note to pay the remaining $350 (“Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement”). The promissory note was to be paid in twenty-four equal installments, including interest at 4.5%, in the amount of approximately $15, commencing six months after closing, with the last payment on March 1, 2019. These payments were paid by the MMG on behalf of the Vivos Debtors. The Vivos Debtors subsequently entered into a promissory note receivable with MMG, described below, for the full stock purchase price. No payment has ever been made against this note and between 2018 to present, there has been $2,503 in additional borrowings.

Notes Receivable

The Company has notes receivable from Vivos Holdings, LLC and VREH, a member of Vivos Group, both related party affiliates due to their ownership percentage in the Company. In January 2021, MMG began applying the legal minimum rate of interest which per Virginia statute is 8.0% on two of the three defaulted notes receivable below. Per the Code of Virginia, the legal rate of interest shall be implied when there is an obligation to pay interest and no express contract to pay interest at a specified rate. However, it was determined that the two notes had clauses capping the default interest at 4.5% and 5.5%, respectively. The rate adjustment for the allowed periods were made using the eligible agreement rates.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

In connection with the Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement, on November 15, 2016, MMG executed a promissory note receivable with Vivos Holdings, LLC in the amount of $1,400. As defined by the Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement, the loan consists of two periods, whereby the first period from November 15, 2016, until September 30, 2018, no principal or interest payments were required. Interest would accrue monthly and a new loan in the amount of $1,773 would be subject to a second loan period. During the second loan period, interest shall be paid in 20 equal consecutive payments, quarterly. Principal plus any unpaid interest is due September 20, 2023. Interest during both loan periods accrues at a rate of 2.5%. Additionally, monthly payments of $15 are made on behalf of Vivos Holdings, Inc. to the seller by MMG. These payments, plus any other payments made by MMG on behalf of Vivos Holdings, LLC, are added to the principal balance of the promissory note receivable (“Vivos/MMG Purchase Agreement Note Receivable”). In 2018, all quarterly interest payments to be made in phase 2 were offset by the management fees due to Vivos Holdings. As of June 30, 2022, the total outstanding balance on this note was $3,446 which includes accrued interest for the period of $39.

On November 15, 2017, MMG executed an intercompany promissory note receivable with VREH in the amount of $772. As defined by the agreement, the loan consists of two periods, whereby the first period from November 15, 2017, until September 30, 2018, no principal or interest payments are required. During the first loan period, interest accrued monthly and a new loan amount of $781 will be subject to a second loan period. During the second period, interest is payable in 20 equal consecutive instalments and the principal balance plus accrued and unpaid interest is due September 30, 2023. Interest during both periods accrues at a rate of 3.5% annually. In 2018, all quarterly interest payments to be made in Phase 2 were offset by the management fees due to Vivos Holdings, LLC. In addition, principal payments totaling $30 were made by the Vivos Group. As of June 30, 2022, the total outstanding balance was $835 which includes accrued interest for period of $12.

On June 12, 2019, MMG entered into a Personal Guaranty agreement with Dr. Doki, pursuant to which Dr. Naveen Doki personally guaranteed to MMG repayment of $3,000 of the balance of the Promissory Note issued to Vivos Debtors on November 15, 2017, within the 2019 calendar year via cash, stock, or other business assets acceptable to the Company. Dr. Doki is a 5% or greater beneficial holder of Company Common stock, and therefore is a related party.

As of February 2020, the Company filed a lawsuit against the majority shareholder, pursuant to the personal guaranty agreement for defaulting on the outstanding notes receivables.

On September 5, 2019, MMG entered into a Secured Promissory Note agreement with Vivos, pursuant to which MMG issued a secured promissory note to the Vivos Group in the principal amount of $750. The note bears interest at 2.5% per year and requires the Vivos Group to make monthly payments to MMG of $10 beginning December 1, 2019, with balance due and payable on November 1, 2026. Upon an event of default, which occurs upon failure of Vivos to make any monthly payment due under the terms of the note, MMG has the right to declare the entire unpaid balance of the note due and payable. The note is secured by 30,000,000 shares of Company Common stock, which is due and payable upon a default by Vivos, which occurs upon failure of Vivos to make any monthly payment due under the terms of the note. In addition, both Dr. Doki and Silvija Valleru personally guaranty the repayment of the note by the Vivos Group. Dr. Doki and Silvija Valleru were beneficial owners of Vivos and are also 5% or greater beneficial owners of Company Common stock, which is qualified by the Merger Arbitration complaint. On December 31, 2021, the total outstanding balance was $790, which includes interest for period of $5. As of June 30, 2022, the total outstanding balance was $800, which includes interest for period of $5.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Additionally, the Vivos Group had borrowings of $2,503 adding to the original notes; with $2,383 between 2018 through 2021. As of June 30, 2022, and December 31, 2021, the receivable totaled $5,0945,157 and $4,985, respectively. This is not inclusive of the additional amounts awarded in the arbitration.

Debt Settlement Agreements

On July 21, 2021, MMG settled the obligation which Vivos Holdings, LLC had obligated MMG to in July 2018, with Libertas Funding, LLC and Kinetic for $475.

On March 6, 2022, MMG received a notice of default, acceleration, and demand for payment-in-full from FVC Bank due to incurable events of default on behalf of Borrower Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC.

Maslow has filed a Motion to Vacate Confessed Judgment entered against it by FVC Bank in the Circuit Court for Fairfax County and has requested that the matter be heard before the end of 2022.

On October 20, 2022, FVC bank filed a Motion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Case for Cause with respect to this pending proceeding filed by VREH. A hearing date is set for November 16, 2022.

On November 2, 2022, Maslow filed a “Response” to the Bank’s Motion to Dismiss, which in essence is a separate Motion for court to dismiss VREH’s Chapter 11 protection filing.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Related Party Relationships

On October 29, 2019, prior to the Merger, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dr. Doki and Silvija Valleru became beneficial owners of 206,606,528 and 51,652,908 shares of RLBY common stock, respectively, equal to 68.968.9%% and 17.217.2%% of the total number of shares of RLBY common stock outstanding after giving effect to the Merger, respectively. The Company is seeking damages, which, if granted, will likely be the remedy set forth within the Merger Agreement which is primarily the relinquishment in whole or in part shares of Company common stock received by the Respondents in connection with the Merger.

In 2019, the Company entered into transactions with two executive officers, Nick Tsahalis and Mark Speck, of the Company, resulting in the issuance of warrants to purchase 163,232 shares each of common stock.

The term “warrant” herein refers to warrants issued by MMG and assumed by the Company as a result of the Merger. The terms of all warrants are the same other than as to the number of shares covered thereby. The Warrant may be exercised at any time or from time to time during the period commencing at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time on first business day following the completion of the Qualified Financing (as defined below) and expiring at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the fifth annual anniversary thereof (the “Exercise Period”). For purposes herein, a “Qualified Financing” means the issuance by the Company, other than certain excluded issuances of shares of Common stock, in one transaction or series of related transactions, which transaction(s) result in aggregate gross proceeds actually received by the Company of at least $5,000. The exercise price per full share of the Company common stock shall be 120120%% of the average sale price of the Company common stock across all transactions constituting a part of the Qualified Financing, with equitable adjustments being made for any splits, combinations or dividends relating to the Company common stock, or combinations, recapitalization, reclassifications, extraordinary distributions and similar events, that occur following one transaction constituting a part of the Qualified Financing and prior to one or more other transactions constituting a part of the Qualified Financing (the “Exercise Price”). The warrants were not valued and included as liability on balance sheet because of uncertainty around their pricing, value and low probability at this juncture in receiving the $5,000 trigger.

On September 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Dr. Doki, and his affiliates and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The parties also agreed to maintain the status quo in corporate governance and related matters pending a final non-appealable judgment confirming any award in arbitration. The parties also signed a Tolling Agreement to toll the statute of limitations following the dismissal of a pending litigation.

On August 31, 2022, the Arbitrator issued an award (the “Award”) with the Company with MMG prevailing on their claims. (See Note 1) for more details.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe parties to the Arbitration had until September 19, 2022, to submit their requests related to the Supplemental Award to be filed by the Arbitrator relating to the assignment of a Receiver. An extension was granted until October 6, 2022, at which point all parties submitted their requests to the Arbitrator. The parties now have until November 23, 2022, to respond to the submissions received by the Arbitrator on October 6, 2022. The Company does not have a definitive date by which it will receive the supplemental award identified in the Arbitration Award dated August 31, 2022, but hopes it will be received before the end of the year.

June 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 9. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company operates within 4four industry segments: EOR, Recruiting and Staffing, Permanent (Direct)Direct Placements, and Video Production. The EOR segment provides freelance talent to a host of large corporate customers in all 50 states. The Recruiting and Staffing segment provides skilled media and IT field talent on a nationwide basis for customers in a myriad of industries. PermanentDirect Placements was added as a segment in the second quarter 2021 as the Company began to take on clients who desired the Company source candidates for permanentdirect hire needs on a regular basis. The Video and Multimedia Production segment provides crewing and Script to Screen services for corporate, government, and non-profit clients, globally.

RELIABILITY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2022

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following tables provides a reconciliation of revenue by reportable segment to consolidated results for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, and 2021, respectively:

For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30:

SCHEDULE OF RECONCILIATION OF REVENUE AND OPERATING INCOME BY REPORTABLE SEGMENT TO CONSOLIDATED RESULTS

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30:

NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through AugustNovember 15, 2022, the date on which the unaudited consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Based upon this evaluation, management has determined that no material subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in or disclosures in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, except as follows:

Maslow has filed a Motion to Vacate Confessed Judgment entered against it by FVC Bank in the Circuit Court for Fairfax County andCounty. A hearing has requested thatbeen scheduled for December 9, 2022.

On October 20, 2022, FVC bank filed a Motion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Case for Cause with respect to this pending proceeding filed by Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (VREH). A hearing date is set for November 16, 2022.

On November 2, 2022, Maslow filed a “Response” to the matter be heard before the end of 2022.Bank’s Motion to Dismiss, which in essence is a separate Motion for court to dismiss VREH’s Chapter 11 protection filing.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This section includes several forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including, but not limited to, statements about our plans, strategies, adequacy of resources and future financial results (such as revenue, gross profit, operating profit, cash flow), are forward-looking statements. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by words like “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “can,” “could,” “should,” “intends,” “project,” “predict,” “plans,” “estimates,” “goal,” “target,” “possible,” “potential,” “would,” “seek,” and similar references to future periods. These statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Because these forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are subject to change, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on us and our clients; our ability to access the capital markets by pursuing additional debt and equity financing to fund our business plan and expenses on terms acceptable to the Vivos Group or at all; negative outcome of pending and future claims and litigation and our ability to comply with our contractual covenants, including in respect of our debt; potential loss of clients and possible rejection of our business model and/or sales methods; weakness in general economic conditions and levels of capital spending by customers in the industries we serve; weakness or volatility in the financial and capital markets, which may result in the postponement or cancellation of our customers’ projects or the inability of our customers to pay our fees; delays or reductions in U.S. government spending; credit risks associated with our customers; competitive market pressures; the availability and cost of qualified labor; our level of success in attracting, training and retaining qualified management personnel and other staff employees; changes in tax laws and other government regulations, including the impact of health care reform laws and regulations; the possibility of incurring liability for our business activities, including, but not limited to, the activities of our temporary employees; our performance on customer contracts; and government policies, legislation or judicial decisions adverse to our businesses. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. We recommend readers to carefully review the entirety of this Quarterly Report, the “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the other reports and documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), particularly our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, our expectations regarding the future performance of our business and the other non-historical statements in the discussion and analysis are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors including those described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, with the SEC. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should read the following discussion together with our financial statements and related notes thereto and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND COMMENTS RELATED TO OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these unaudited consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no material changes or developments in the Company’s evaluation of the accounting estimates and the underlying assumptions or methodologies that it believes to be Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates as disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Management’s Discussion included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes discussion of various factors and items related to the Company’s results of operations and liquidity. There have been no other significant changes in most of the factors discussed in the Form 10-K and many of the items discussed in the Form 10-K are relevant to 2022 operations; thus, the reader of this report should read Management’s Discussion included in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, was $6,481,$6,464, which was $1,407$477 or 27.7% greater6.9% less than for the same period in 2021 with secondthird quarter revenue at $5,074.$6,941. EOR grewdeclined by $1,534$211 or 38.5%3.7%, compared to $5,515,the third quarter of 2021, to $5,494, which represented 85.1%85% of secondthird quarter 2022 revenue.

Staffing grew $86 to $898declined by $114 in the secondthird quarter of 2022, but approximately $106or 11.9% to $848. This consisted of this total was based on two reassignments of specific US government projects from Video Production to Media Staffing.

Media Staffing, a subsetwhich declined $99 and IT staffing which was $15 off the mark of Staffing, grew beyond benefitting for $106the third quarter comparative in reclassed Video Production project revenue from a year ago, with second quarterly revenues of $824 compared to $676 a year ago, an increase of $148. The reclass was merely taking recurring non project revenue previously classified as Video Production and reassigning it appropriately to Media Staffing. The impact in 2022 was $106 in the second quarter. IT Staffing, the other subset, declined comparatively in the second quarter 2022 to 2021 by $62, garnering $74 in 2022.2021.

Video Production would have had a decline in revenue outside the $106 deemed not be staffing work, had remained, as that segment produced $68 in revenueof $174, but Direct Placements garnered $60 compared to $250$38 in the second quarter 2021.

Permanent Placement failed to post revenue in the third quarter ending June 30, 2022.of 2021.

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, revenue totaled $12,264$18,729 compared to $10,868 in$17,809 year to date for the same period a year ago, resulting in $1,396$920 in incremental revenue comparably.

EOR revenues through nine months ended September 30, 2022, have produced an even larger comparative gain in the first half of 2022 compared to 2021, with $10,288 for the six months ended June 30, 2022,$15,783 compared to $8,478$14,186 a year ago. This is an increase of $1,810$1,597 or 21.3%11.3%, which represented 83.9%84.3% of the Company’s total year to date (YTD) revenue through JuneSeptember 30.

Staffing increased as well when comparing six-month performance ending June 30, 2022, to same period in 2021, by $126 to a totalis $13 ahead of $1,822. This represented a 7.4% increase over 2021’s Staffing Revenue of $1,696last year’s pace through the sixnine months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2021, with $2,671 in revenue compared with $2,658 comparatively in 2021.

Media Staffing grew $397has grown $216 to $1,683 with $206 attributable$2,464 but this was almost completely offset by IT Staff’s $203 decline to $207 from $410 in the reassignment of two client projects previously credited to Video Production.nine months ended September 30, a year ago.

Video Production revenue has compared unfavorably to the same period in 2021, declining $721 with revenues of $115$176 compared to $661$897 in 2021. This decline was the result of three clients curtailing projects they had with us in 2021, the loss of one client which changed its bid requirements, and tour reclassifying certain work with clients as Media Staffing given its nature.

Our Direct Placement business through nine months in 2022 has $99 in revenue compared to $68 over the same period in 2021, a $546 drop. If adjusted for the reclassification of work credited to it in 2021, Video Production would$31 or 45.6% increase as we have dropped by $340.a few newer clients that focus on direct media placements only.

Cost of Revenue / Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three-month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2022, was $887$891 representing 13.7%13.8% of revenues, which is a $169an $88 improvement over the $718$803 in gross profit MMG earned in 2021’s secondthird quarter when the gross margin reached 14.1%11.6%.

The overall quarterly gross margin (“GM”) percentage improvement can be attributed to the strength of the EOR margin reaching 12.4% in the third quarter 2022 and compared to 9.1% a year ago.

The quartertwo catalysts for EOR margin lift are price increases, and heavier use of W2 resources vs. 1099 labor based on client mix. For example, lower revenues for one large EOR client in ‘22 are highly weighted towards 1099s over quarter gross margin (“GM”) percentage drop canW2. GP would be partially attributed to the strength of the aforementioned EOR revenue increase of $1,534, which resulted in EOR dominating the four business segments by accounting for 85.1% of the business versus 78.5% in the second quarter 2021; as EOR business GM percentage was 11.7% to the rest which totaled 22.7%, the over quarterly average slipped from a year ago.approximately 20 basis points lower if those revenues still existed.

However, EOR’s 11.7%, margin was strongW2 workers in EOR represented 82% of labor compared with 10.4%to 74% in the firstthird quarter in 2021. On average in 2022, 10.1% in the second quarter a year ago and a 9.8% averagemargins are 9%, 1.1% higher for all of 2021. This improvement can be attributed to some pricing changes negotiated with several key clients, and the client mix being favorable as clients with slightly higher margins contributed more heavily to the quarter. This is not expected to be the case throughout 2022.EOR W2 labor than 1099.

MMG’s Staffing gross profit grew modestly by $6margin slid from 20.1% to $191, as volume had more16.7%, due to do withclient mix, however while overall non EOR total margin, including Video Production and Direct Placements were at 21.9% in the growth than gross margin percentage as Staffing margins declined by 80 basis points3 months ending September 30, 2022, compared to 20.7%. IT Staffing dropped approximately 1%22.8% in gross margin percentage to 27.8%.the same period in 2021.

Year to date 2022, the Company’s gross profit improved by $153$240 or 10.5%10.6% to $1,616$2,507 compared to $2,267 over the first nine months in 2021.

Gross margin percentage fell slightlyrose from 12.7% in 2021 to 13.2% from 13.5%.13.4% when comparing the nine months ending September 30, 2022, to same period in 2021.

EOR experienced a year-to-date margin boost to 11.7% compared to 9.5% through September 30, 2021. Thirty basis points were spurred by resources moved from billable to indirect overhead. Increased use of W2 client mix and pricing changes led to the additional spur in EOR margins. Media Staffing margins year to date have held steady to 11.1%where they were a year ago at declined to 19.9% compared to 10.1%20.8% through June 30, 2021.three quarters in 2021, while Video Production’s YTD GM % also improvednine-month gross profit margin has risen to 24.9% from 20.9% a year ago. Media Staffing GM % has slipped24.3% compared to 21.9% versus 24.5%20.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2021. Gross Profit in Media Staffing for the nine months ending JuneSeptember 30, however rose to $368 from $314 as volumes increased.2022. However, the overall Video Production impact on overall gross profit margin is nominal given it represents 1% of the business revenue and 1.7% of gross profit.

General and Administrative (“G&A”)

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2022, were $1,097,$941, as compared to $878$866 in the comparable period in 2021, representing a $220$75 or 25.1%8.7% increase. This increase was predominantly the result of having an estimated $107increases in the following areas; $53 in legal, $37 in contract services, $24 in employee health insurance related costs, and $21 in commissions. Of the $53 in legal fees, $34 were arbitration related costs, employee salaries and benefits ratcheting up by $64 or 9.4% fromas were $9 of the second quarter 2021, and contracted labor and recruiting$37 in contract services, for the three months ended September 30, 2022.

Arbitration related costs increasing by $33represented $43, an increase of $35 comparatively from a year ago.

For the sixnine months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2022, G&A was $2,402$3,343 compared with $1,688$2,554 a year ago, an increase of $714$789 or 29.7%30.9%. However, the legal and consulting costs associated with our arbitration (See Note 1) represented $506represents $543 in totality, a $419$525 increase in like costs associated with the Vivos Matter from a year ago. MMG salaries and benefits increased $201 with sales$190, $69 of which are wages and client services department non incentive based compensation increasing $127,payroll taxes, $54 commissions, and $39 health insurance benefits for employees. $50 of the $69 in wage and payroll tax proliferation is attributed to a need to move certain billable resources from EOR clients to overhead as we increaseddescribed above in the Gross Profit section. Departmentally, our investmentClient Services group, which includes recruiters, has developed, resulting in these two vital groups. The other areasincrease of spend increase were commissions to drive sales and recruiting totaling $33; bonus accrued at $72 as we move to tie more compensation to performance-based measures; commercial legal $19; recruiting software $15; and travel $11.$60 of the $190.

Interest Expense

The Company incurred $66$111 in interest charges for financing (factoring) its invoices in the first sixnine months of 2022 compared with $63$78 in the same period a year ago,ago. In the secondthird quarter MMG incurred $36$46 in interest changes compared to $18$15 in the same period a year ago as MMG increased its average position under finance from $1.3M$1,088 a year ago to $2.5M$2,276 in the secondthird quarter 2022. The cost of financing increased from a year ago when the prime rate was 3.25% in the third quarter 2021 with two increases in the third quarter 2022, ending at 6.25%. Thus, our borrowing rates were 6% in the third quarter 2021 and ranged from 7.5% to 8.25% in the third quarter 2022.

Other Income (Expense)

MMG benefitted from $1 in corporate credit card rebate in the second quarter 2022. For the sixnine months ended June 3, 2021,September 30, 2022, MMG had $0received $210 in other income by way of ERC funds compared to a year ago when MMG earned $8,042$9,855 in other income courtesy of $5,273 in the PPP Forgiveness which included the recovery of accrued interest, and $2,769$4,582 In Employee Retention Credits (ERC). The $210 was thought to be ineligible portion of 2021’s first quarter ERC, but it was deemed to be based on our payrolls, eligible per the IRS.

Income Tax

The Company has taken a tax loss of $117 over the nine months ending September 30, 2022, to record discrete tax items and true up of prior year returns.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our working capital requirements are driven primarily by EOR field talent payments, G&A salaries, public company costs, attorney fees associated with the protracted Vivos Matter, interest associated with factoring, and client accounts receivable receipts. Since receipts from client payments are on average 70 days behind payments to field talent, working capital requirements can be periodically challenged. We have a Factoring Facility with Triumph,Gulf Coast Bank (“Gulf”), whereas TriumphGulf advances 93% of our eligible receivables at an advance rate of 15 basis points, an interest rate of prime plus 2%., and our prime floor rate at 4%. Our Days Outstanding (DSO) for the trailing 12 months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2022, is at 6466 comparable to 62 DSO for the trailing twelve months ending JuneSeptember 30, 2021.

In 2021, a few of our large clients began demanding 90-day terms. Delays in receipt of purchase orders also has had an adverse impact on our DSO since 2019. Despite these challenges, our DSO in the second quarter ending June 30, 2022, improved to 65 from 80 in the first three months of 2022.

When looking at A/R aging in relation to due date, as of June 30, 2022, 77.4% or $3,620 of our $4,668 in total trade receivables were < 31 days aged, compared to 97.6% a year ago. This has much to do with extended payment terms to our larger clients as well as delays of up to 30 days on receiving purchase orders after the invoice has been prepared. MMG management is working on ways to speed back up the cash conversion process outside of financing.

In 2021, a few of our large clients began demanding 90-day terms. Delays in receipt of purchase orders also has had an adverse impact on our DSO since 2019. Thus, trailing twelve-month DSO ending September 30, 2022, was 66 from 62 in the first nine months of 2021. This has more to do with revenue mix to clients with whom have 60 and 90 day payment terms than delinquent accounts. However, our over 60 days past due represented 8.7% or $398 of our total A/R compared to 1% in the same nine-month period ending September 30, 2021.By October 31, $308 of the $398 had been collected.

When looking at A/R aging in relation to due date, as of September 30, 2022, 73.6% or $3,370 of our $4,581 in total trade receivables were < 31 days aged, compared to 96.5% a year ago.

Our over 60 days past due represented 8.7% or $398 of our total A/R compared to 1% in the same nine-month period ending September 30, 2021. By October 31, $308 of the $398 has been collected.

Our Federal and state tax liability has a balance of $92$276 at the end of the secondthird quarter 2022, this is mainly for state income taxes because we deposited $725 forof our 2021 expected federal tax liability.liability in the first quarter.

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations via accounts receivable and borrowings under our Factoring Facility with TriumphGulf enabling access to the 7% unfactored portion. Because certain large clients have changed their payment practices announcing 60- and 90-day terms amounting to a unilateral extension to contractual terms by 30-60 days, we can experience an adverse cash flow impact since TriumphGulf does not provide credit if an account obligor pays more than 120 days after the invoice date.

Our primary uses of cash are for payments to field talent, corporate, and staff employees, related payroll liabilities, operating expenses, public company costs, including but not limited to, general and professional liability and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance premiums, legal fees, filing fees, auditor and accounting fees, stock transfer services, and board compensation; followed by cash factoring and other borrowing interest; cash taxes; and debt payments.

Since we are an EOR with the majority of contracted talent paid as W-2 employees who are paid known amounts on a consistent schedule; our cash inflows do not typically align with these required payments, resulting in temporary cash challenges,outlays, which is why we employ factoring.

Vivos Debtors as of JuneSeptember 30, 2022, had notes receivable totaling $5,094$5,157 including default on a $3,000 promissory note and on a $750 tax obligation in December 2019. After numerous failed collection attempts, on February 17, 2020, the Company initiated an action in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County Maryland against Dr. Doki and the Vivos Holdings for non-payment. The Vivos Matter moved to arbitration where on August 31,2022 the Arbitrator issued an award (the “Award”) with the Company and MMG prevailing on their claims. This is not inclusive of the additional amounts awarded in the arbitration.

It was also anticipated that following the Merger, the Company would both access the capital markets by selling additional shares of Company common stock and use shares of Company common stock as currency to acquire other business revenues. However, all 300 million authorized shares of Company common stock were issued in connection with the Merger. No shares are expected to become available to the Company until the legal dispute with the Vivos Debtors and Vivos Group is resolved. At that point, the Company can decide whether to amend the Company’s Certificate of Formation to increase the number of authorized shares of Company common stock or approve a reverse-split of the outstanding shares of Company common stock to provide additional shares for these purposes. No assurance can be given as to when this might take place.

On May 5, 2020, MMG received a $5,216 loan through the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) with a term of two (2) years and an interest rate of 1% per annum. The PPP provided that the Company be eligible for forgiveness if the loan proceeds were used for payroll and certain other specified operating expenses while maintaining specified headcount requirements. On June 10, 2021, the Company was informed by the SBA that it had met the requirements and that both the $5,216 and of accrued interest totaling $57 were forgiven.

Because our first three-quarter revenues in 2021 were 80% or less than they were in 2019, the Company was eligible for the Employee Retention Credit. Consequently, MMG received $155 in direct payroll credits from the IRS via its payroll provider Paycom in the late 2^nd quarter and $1,086 in the third quarter. MMG returned $842 to the IRS for payroll credits received in the 4^th quarter once the program ended retroactively in mid-November 2021.This payment was made to the IRS through Paycom, the Company’s payroll provider in January 2022.

Overall, these programs bolstered our working capital and enabled us to bring back employees and continue to serve our clients.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2022, our working capital was $8,608$8,725 compared to $9,361 on December 31, 2021,$9,417 a year ago and compared to $9,361 on December 31, 2021. Our adjusted working capital at the end of JuneSeptember 2022, excluding the notes receivable related to the Vivos Debtors totals $3,514$3,568 compared to $3,605$4,468 a year earlier.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Risk Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The President and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the President and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, known to the President and Chief Financial Officer that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

RELIABILITY INC.

OTHER INFORMATION

JuneSeptember 30, 2022

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On or about February 25, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Dr. Doki, to enforce Maslow’s rights under certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the defendants. The case is proceeding. The Company believes that it will be granted a judgment in its favor. MMG intends to continue to vigorously pursue this litigation.

On or about May 6, 2020, the Defendants filed with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland a Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint for Damages, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Jury Demand (the “Counterclaim”), The Company believes that the Counterclaim has no merit. The Company will vigorously defend itself and its indemnified officers, directors and other parties as permitted by the Company’s organizational documents. The Company and the other Counterclaim defendants have moved to have the Debt Collection Suit and the Counterclaim stayed pending the outcome of the Arbitration which began March 21, 2022, described below.

On or about June 5, 2020, the Company submitted a Claimant’s Notice of Intention to Arbitrate and Demand for Arbitration (the “Arbitration”) with the American Arbitration Association in New York, and to the Respondents thereto: Dr. Doki; Silvija Valleru; Shirisha Janumpally (individually and in her capacity as trustee of Judos Trust); Kalyan Pathuri (individually in his capacity as trustee of Igly Trust) and Federal Systems (the “Respondents”). The Arbitration alleges that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and committed fraud in connection with the Merger. The Company is seeking damages which if granted will likely be the remedy set forth within the Merger Agreement which is in whole or in part shares of Company common stock received by the Respondents in connection with the Merger. The Company has brought a motion to compel the Arbitration which is currently being decided by the Federal Courts in New York. On August 4, 2021, the US District Court, Southern District of New York, denied the Respondents motion to dismiss.

On June 12, 2020, Igly Trust, a Vivos Group entity, asked the Texas court for an injunction requiring the Company to provide a shareholder list and to hold a shareholder meeting. On October 20, 2020, the Texas court denied the injunction but, incongruously, dismissed all the Vivos Group plaintiffs for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Company appealed the dismissal because the court had jurisdiction over Igly Trust once it made affirmative claims in Texas and because the Court’s order denying the injunction is an important precedent for establishing that the directors under Texas law retain control of shareholder lists and determining the timing of shareholder meetings. This matter has since been moved into a single binding arbitration proceeding in Maryland.

After an extension was granted to Reliability’s “reply brief,” on June 2, 2021, Reliability Incorporated, MMG Media Group, Inc, Nick Tsahalis and Mark Speck filed an appellant’s brief in the Fourteenth District of Texas, Houston Texas to challenge the court’s prior ruling granting a special appearance to Igly Trust and to the Doki Shareholders. A response to the filed appellant brief has not yet been received. This matter has since been moved into a single binding arbitration proceeding in Maryland.

On December 23, 2020, at a hearing in the Maryland District Court, a motion by the Vivos Group to compel a shareholder meeting was summarily dismissed. The judge agreed with the Company that permitting the Vivos Group to vote their shares at a meeting of shareholders could materially harm the interests of the Company as a whole, its employees and minority shareholders. The judge also commented that, based on the evidence presented, management was performing its fiduciary duties to protect the Company despite adverse circumstances. A full trial to address the Company’s lawsuit to enforce the repayment of notes and the Vivos Group counterclaim, was scheduled to commence in early October 2021 but was pre-empted by an agreement by both sides to go to arbitration in March 2022.

On January 20, 2021, Defendants and Counter/Third-Party Plaintiffs, Vivos Holdings, LLC (“Vivos”), Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), Dr. Doki, Mr. Pathuri, Igly Trust (“Igly”), Judos Trust (“Judos”), by counsel, filed a Notice of Appeal with the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland denying their Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed on December 23, 2020. However, the deadline to pursue the appeal lapsed absent additional filings by the Vivos Group.

On August 9, 2021, Reliability filed an additional claim in the Debt Collection Suit and Vivos Default Counterclaim in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Dr. Doki, Valleru, Mr. Pathuri, Mrs. Janumpally, Igly, and Judos, that the Respondents breached the Merger Agreement in a number of significant respects and committed fraud in connection with the Merger.

On September 7, 2021, the Company entered in Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Dr. Doki. and his affiliates and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The parties also agreed to maintain the status quo in corporate governance and related matters pending a final non-appealable judgment confirming any award in arbitration. The parties also signed a Tolling Agreement to toll the statute of limitations following the dismissal of a pending litigation.

On August 2, 2022, VREH filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in the District Court of Maryland. This action prevented the Arbitrator from providing any ruling relating to Note II in the arbitration case at the time of his award.

On August 24^, 2022, the Company filed a motion to stay the VREH Bankruptcy filing to allow the Arbitrator to rule on the claims against VREH. The motion to lift the stay was granted by the court on September 16, 2022, after the initial award by the Arbitrator.

hearing portion

On August 31, 2022, the Arbitrator issued an award (the “Award”) with the Company with MMG prevailing on their claims. The Company and MMG were awarded the following:

Section 11.404(a)(1)(B) of the binding Arbitration formally began on March 21, 2022, and has since concluded. A decision is anticipatedTexas Business Organizations Code provides for the appointment of a rehabilitative receiver when “the governing persons of the entity are deadlocked in the third quarter 2022.management of the entity’s affairs, the owners or members of the entity are unable to break the deadlock, and irreparable injury to the entity is being suffered or is threatened because of the deadlock.” With respect to the receivership, the owners or holders of all of the shares of common stock of the Company received as a result of the conversion of 1,600 shares of common stock of MMG owed by Naveen and Valleru under the Merger Agreement shall not be entitled to vote any of those shares at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders of the Company during the period of the receivership. Upon the completion of the receiver’s primary function of collecting damages due to the Company, the receivership shall terminate and the restrictions on the rights of the shareholders of the Company imposed by the Award shall be lifted.

The parties to the Arbitration had until September 19, 2022 to submit their requests related to the Supplemental Award to be filed by the Arbitrator relating to the assignment of a Receiver. An extension was granted until October 6, 2022 at which point all parties submitted their requests to the Arbitrator. The parties now have until November 23, 2022 to respond to the submissions received by the Arbitrator on October 6, 2022. The Company does not have a definitive date by which it will receive the supplemental award identified in the Arbitration Award dated August 31, 2022, but hopes it will be received before the end of the year.

The following legal proceedings where Vivos Group borrowings impacting MMG:

On September 28, 2018, Credit Cash filed a complaint against MMG, Vivos, Vivos Acquisitions, LLC, Dr. Doki, Dr. Valleru (the “Parties”) and other defendants in the United States Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland for the District of New Jersey for, among other things, breach of contract of the MMG and HCRN Credit Facilities and their respective guaranties in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement (the “DNJ Action”). On October 30, 2018, Credit Cash filed a motion to intervene in an action pending in New York State, Monroe County, filed by HCRN and LE Finance, LLC against the Parties, and other defendants (“NY State Action”). On December 10, 2018, the Parties entered into a settlement agreement for the purpose of settling certain claims related to the DNJ Action only. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, certain repayment terms were agreed upon between Credit Cash and the Parties, but Credit Cash did not relinquish the right to pursue any claims related to the NY State Action, nor to pursue any remedies against any of the parties in relation to the November 15, 2017, agreement. Certain of the Vivos Group executed and delivered to MMG that certain Agreement for the Contingent Liquidation of the common stock of MMG, dated as of October 28, 2019 (the “Liquidation Agreement”), pursuant to which such Vivos Group pledged to MMG the shares of Company common stock they received in the Merger to provide the capital required to satisfy the Parties’ obligations under the Settlement Agreements. Vivos Group misrepresented upon the execution of the Liquidation Agreement to MMG the status of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement, which were, in fact, then in default. To date these Vivos Group have not cooperated with the Company to monetize those shares as contemplated by the Liquidation Agreement. The Company took appropriate actions to enforce its rights under the Liquidation Agreement, which will be dictated in part by the outcome of the Arbitration. On or about March 16, 2020, Credit Cash entered its New Jersey confession of judgment with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland. MMG needs to confirm whether this matter has been settled and if so whether MCA lenders and HCRN remitted payments to Credit Cash, and if so, which liens have been removed.

Healthcare Resource Network Complaint: On or about February 25, 2020, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Maryland against Vivos Holdings, LLC, Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Dr. Doki, to enforce MMG’s rights under certain promissory notes and a personal guarantee made by the defendants. The case is proceeding. The Company believes that it will be granted a judgment in its favor. MMG intends to continue to vigorously pursue this litigation. On September 3, 2020, MMG and HCRN entered into a Tolling Agreement pursuant to which HCRN dismissed MMG from this litigation without prejudice and agreed to forebear filing a new complaint or initiating any lawsuit or other legal proceeding against MMG until January 31, 2022.

On or about May 5, 2020, Kinetic Direct Funding domesticated a foreign judgement in the Montgomery County Circuit Court system again Health Care Resources Network (HCRN), Maslow Media Group, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals, Alliance Micro, Inc. and Dr. Doki. This foreign judgement from the State of New York relates to loans the Vivos Group took out by adding Maslow Media Group as additional collateral. This loan is currently in default. Foreign Judgement total is $579. There was a settlement reached on October 1,2021 with both parties releasing each other of any and all claims with no assets changing hands. MMG needs to determine which lien releases have been filed.

On July 21, 2021, MMG came to an agreement with Kinetic and Libertas for $475 to release MMG from being obligated to this Vivos Group debt. The intended shield to protect MMG from having to pay Vivos Group’s debt was the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement which Vivos Debtors refuse to comply with.

On August 2, 2022, VREH filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in the District Court of Maryland. This action prevented the Arbitrator from providing any ruling relating to Note II in the arbitration case at the time of his award

On August 24^, 2022, the company filed a motion to stay the VREH Bankruptcy filing to allow the Arbitrator to rule on the claims against VREH. The motion to lift the stay was granted by the court on September 16, 2022, after the initial award by the Arbitrator

Item 1a. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, shareholders should carefully consider the factors discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

We are currently engaged in substantial and complex litigation and arbitration with the Vivos Group, the outcome of which could materially harm our business and financial results.

As more fully described in NoteNotes 1 and 6 (Commitments and Contingencies) of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, we are currently engaged in litigation and arbitration with the Vivos Group.Group and received an award judgement on August 31, 2022. The litigation includes multiple complaints and counterclaims by us and the Vivos Group in venues in Maryland and Texas. The arbitration was brought by the Company to enforce its rights under the Merger Agreement.Agreement and other loan documents.

The litigation and arbitration are substantial and complex, and they have caused and could continue to cause us to incur significant costs, as well as distract our management over an extended period. The litigation and arbitration may substantially disrupt our business and we cannot assure you that we will be able to resolve the litigation on terms favorable to us or that we will be successful in the arbitration.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits:

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Index to Exhibits

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections